HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-01-04 Packet - SpecialCITY OF UKIAH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Special Meeting
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
January 4, 2008
4:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
2. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are
interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not
on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3)
minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be
taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda.
3.
a.
mending Plowshares on Opening New Kitchen-Dining Facility
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Discussion of the Strategic Plan Process
b. Discussion and Possible Action on the City Manager Recruitment Process
c. Appointment of Interim City Manager and Consideration and Possible Approval of Contract
5. NEW BUSINESS
a. Discussion and Direction Regarding Input to the Board of Supervisors on the
Possible Repeal of Measure G and Adoption of a 25 Plant Per Parcel Limit in the
Unincorporated Area of the County
6. CLOSED SESSION -Closed Session may be held at any time during or before the meeting
a. Public Employment (§54957)
Title: City Manager
b. Public Employment (§54957)
Title: Interim City Manager
c. Conference with Labor Negotiators (§54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Pat Thompson, Interim City Manager
Unrepresented Employee: Police Chief
7. ADJOURNMENT
Please be advised that the City needs to be notified 72 hours in advance of a meeting if any specific accommodations or
interpreter services are needed in order for you to attend. The City complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to
reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request.
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the
bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, not less than
24 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda.
Dated this 3rd day of January, 2008.
JoAnne Currie, Deputy City Clerk
PROCLAM~ITION
1'LO WSHARES
PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER AND
COMMUNITY DINING ROOM DAY
JANUARY 6, 2008
WHEREAS, Plowshares Peace and Justice Center was founded in 1983 to provide
hot and nutritious meals without charge to those who might otherwise go hungry; and
WHEREAS, Plowshares is now in its twenty-fifth year of providing services to the
community; and
WHEREAS, Plowshares has expanded its services over the years to include
Homeless Services, Meals on Wheels, vocational training, counseling and referrals; and
WHEREAS, Plowshares strives via advocacy, education and the provision of
services to eliminate the causes of poverty and hunger; and
WHEREAS, Plowshares strives to maintain a stable and supportive environment
where all are treated with respect, justice and dignity; and
WHEREAS, Plowshares is a community-based organization that relies on the
financial and volunteer contributio~ls of a generous community; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah has facilitated the acquisition and use of grant
funding to assist in the construction of a new Community Dining Room; and
WHEREAS, Plowshares has successfully completed a major fundraising effort and
the successful construction of a new Community Dining Room in order to better serve
those in need;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Douglas F. Crane, Mayor of the City of Ukiah, on behalf
of my fellow City Councilmembers, Phil Baldwin, Mari Rodin, John McCowen, and
Benj Thomas hereby proclaim
January 6, 2008, as Plowshares Peace and Justice Center and
Community Dining Room Day.
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Ukiah
commends Plowshares, including its volunteers, staff and board members on the
occasion of the Grand Opening of the new Peace and Justice Center and Community
Dining room.
Crane /1layor
c
Signed and sealed, this 4~h day of January, in the year Two Thousand and Eight. ~
`,
Page 1 of 1
Ann Burck
From: Ann Burck
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 3:54 PM
To: 'Benj Thomas'; 'Doug Crane'; 'John McCowen'; 'Mari Rodin ; 'Phil Baldwin'
Cc: Pat Thompson; Alan Jamison
Subject: Update on Water Distribution System Status
Importance: High
Status Update on the City's Water Distribution System:
Well 3 was taken offline at 11:00 am today due to high turbidity. The water level of the Russian River began
receding about 1:30 pm. If the break in the weather continues until tomorrow morning, there is a good
possibility Well 3 will be back online sometime tomorrow. However, there is no guarantee. There is currently
4 MG of water available in storage. The capacity of Well 4 is 1.15 MGD. Average day demand the last week
of December was 1.93 MGD. If Well 3 does not come back online, 300 gpm is available from Millview at a
cost of $2.15 per 1,000 gallons. The net cost to the City would be $280 per day. This would still leave a
shortage of 348,000 gallons/day. There is enough water in the reservoirs to replace the shortage for 11
days.
~`Y•rLSr ~U.~ulr.,P
Project Engineer
Interim Public Utilities Manager
Ukiah Utilities, City of Ukiah
1/4/2008
ITEM NO.: 4a
DATE: January 4, 2008
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN PROCESS
Mayor Crane has requested that this item be agendized for discussion of the strategic plan
process and timelines.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discuss and provide direction regarding the strategic plan
process and timelines.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested by: Mayor Crane
Prepared by: Sue Goodrick, Risk Manager/Budget Officer
Coordinated with: Pat Thompson, Interim City Manager
•" ~ ~~
APPROVED: -~ ~~~ti/`~~~i
Pat Thompson, Interim City Manager
ITEM NO.: 4b
DATE: January 4, 2008
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE CITY MANAGER
RECRUITMENT PROCESS
Council has requested a possible discussion and update on the City Manager recruitment
process dependent upon outcome of Closed Session discussion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discuss and provide possible direction regarding the City
Manager recruitment process dependent upon outcome of closed session discussion.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested by: City Council
Prepared by: Sue Goodrick, Risk Manager/Budget Officer
Coordinated with: Pat Thompson, Interim City Manager
~~-> ,
APPROVE~~ ~Gi.~ ~~td~-/V.A-e'v
fat Thompson, Interim City Manager
ITEM NO.: 4c
DATE: January 4, 2008
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Appointment of Interim City Manager and Consideration and Possible
Approval of Contract
A draft contract will be presented for discussion at the meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Appoint the Interim City Manger; Consider and Approve the
Contract.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested by: City Council
Prepared by: JoAnne Currie, Deputy City Clerk and Pat Thompson, Interim City Manager
Coordinated with: Pat Thompson, Interim City Manager
Attachments: None
APPROVE6r_ ~~~~~-~-LC-~~~---
Pat Thompson, In erim City Manager
ITEM NO.: 5a
DATE: January 4, 2008
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION REGARDING INPUT TO THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE POSSIBLE REPEAL OF MEASURE G AND ADOPTION OF A 25 PLANT
PER PARCEL LIMIT IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
Background: On December 11, 2007, the Board of Supervisors introduced an ordinance that would impose a
limit of 25 plants per legal parcel for the cultivation of marijuana. The County previously adopted a limit of 25
plants per medical marijuana patient or qualified caregiver. There are cases of qualified caregivers possessing
or claiming to possess authorization from multiple medical marijuana patients, with the result that some
"caregivers" are growing hundreds of plants on a single parcel. Adoption of the 25 plant limit is intended to
reduce the negative impacts that large scale cultivation of marijuana often poses for neighboring residents. The
Board is expected to take final action on January 8, 2008.
The Board is also expected to consider a request from the Restore Mendocino/Repeal Measure G Coalition
requesting that the Board of Supervisors place a measure on the ballot for the repeal of Measure G and the
adoption of the state limits as provided for in Senate Bill 420. Measure G seeks to make the enforcement and
prosecution of marijuana laws the lowest priority for law enforcement and to exempt from prosecution anyone
growing 25 or fewer marijuana plants. Critics contend that 25 plants is a commercial growing operation which
has led to widespread abuses and threats to the public safety and that there is no need for a limit higher than
the state limits. Senate Bi11420 provides that medical marijuana patients and qualified caregivers may possess
6 mature or 12 immature plants or 8 ounces of dried marijuana, or an amount consistent with the amount
prescribed by a patient's physician. The County may adopt a higher limit than that provided for by Senate Bill
420, but may not adopt a lower limit.
Mayor Crane and Councilmember McCowen have requested that this item be agendized for discussion to
decide if the Council wishes to send a letter in support of adoption of the 25 plant per parcel limit and to support
placing a measure on the ballot for the repeal of Measure G and adoption of the state limits as provided for in
Senate Bill 420.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discuss and provide direction regarding input to the Board of
Supervisors on the possible repeal of Measure G and adoption of a 25 plant per parcel limit in
the unincorporated area of the County of Mendocino.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested by: Mayor Crane and Councilmember McCowen
Prepared by: Sue Goodrick, Risk Manager/Budget Officer; JoAnne Currie Deputy City Clerk
Coordinated with: Pat Thompson, Interim City Manager
Attachments: 1- Measure G Marijuana Ordinance for Mendocino County
2- Petition to Board of Supervisors of Mendocino County
APPROVED: =--~a~l ~-~~~~Qa~-~
mat Thompson, Interim City Manager
Attucf ~ment # I
Jim Hill
Trelanie Hill
Kristen Peskuski
Tom Davenport
Paula Dieter
Bob Dieter
Supporting Organizations:
American Medical Marijuana Association
NorCal NORML
California NORML
N.O.R.M.L. (National Orgaization for reform of Marijuana Laws)
A.S.A. (Americans for Safe Access)
Measure G
MARIJUANA ORDINANCE FOR MENDOCINO
COUNTY
The people of Mendocino County find as follows:
* WHEREAS Cannabis saliva (marijuana) is a beneficial plant with a
respscta6/e heritage and hundreds of well--known industrial, medicinal and
recreational uses;
* WHEREAS two decades o/ marijuana law enforcement in Mendocino County
has not stopped cultivation here but has unnecessarily marginalized a large
number of otherwise law abiding citizens who grow and use marfjuana;
* WHEREAS !hose who grow for personal use are not responsible for violent
incidents sometimes associated with marijuana cultivation, but are vulnerable
to theft;
* WHEREAS The Institute of Medicine has found that mariJuana has bona fide
medical uses and is not a gateway to hard drug addiction;
* WHEREAS law enforcement has carried out investigations, confiscations, and
arrests against persons cultivating and using medical marijuana under
Proposition 215 in Mendocino County;
* WHEREAS the cities of Berkeley and San Francisco have longstanding
ordinances which instruct police to minimize the priority o/marfjuana
enforcement.
Section 2: PURPOSE
The ordinance codif/ed in this chapter will:
A. Instruct the county government to support all efforts toward the
decriminalization of marijuana;
B. Instruct the county sheriff and district attorney to make marijuana
enforcement their lowest priority with respect to other crimes;
C. Establish a maximum limit of plants and weight for cultivation and
possession of marijuana for personal use 7n Mendocino County, and prohibit
the expenditure of public funds Ior enforcement of marijuana laws against
cultivators and users in possession of quantities below that limit.
D. Remove the fear of prosecution and the stigma of criminality horn people
who harmlessly cultivate andlor use marijuana for personal medical or
recreational purposes.
E. Extend police protection to those growing or possessing marijuana fo-
personal use;
F. Provide for the continued enforcement of marijuana laws against those who
cultivate, transport and possess marijuana for sale.
THEREFORE: the purpose of this chapter is to establish Cannabis eMorcement
policy for Mendocino County.
Section 3: DECRIMINALIZATION OF CANNABIS /N CALIFORNIA
It Is the desire of the people of Mendocino County that the cultivation for
personal use of Cannabis be decriminalized in Cal/fomia. In this context, the
board of supervisors is directed to lobby state and federal governments for the
immediate decriminalization of the personal use of Cannabis, speciP-cally by
repealing Sections 11357, (possession), 11358, (transportation), and - 11359,
(cultivation), of the California Health and Safety Code. The people also urge
the Sheriff and District Attorney to publicly support such decriminalization.
Section 4: LAW ENFORCEMENT PRIORITY OF CANNABIS
Through its budgetary authority, the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors
shall seek to ensure that the Sheriffs Office and the District Attorney give
lowest priority to the enforcement and prosecution of marijuana laws.
Section 5: SHERIFF OFFlCE ARRESTS AND ORATIONS
The Board of Supervisors shall use its budgetary authority to ensuro that the
Sheriff's Office makes no arrests and issues no citations for violations of the
above state Health and Safety Code sections in any single case involving 2S or
(ewer adult flowering female marijuana plant or the equivalent in dried
marijuana.
Sect/on B: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PROSECUTIONS
The Board of Supervisors shall use its funding authority to ensure that the
Section 7: EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR CANNABIS ENFORCEMENT
Neither the MendoGno County Board of Supervisors, nor the SheriM, nor the
District Attorney shall spend or authorize the expenditure of any public funds
/or the investigation, arrest, or prosecution of any person, or the seizure of any
property in any single case involving 25 or fewer adult flowering female
marijuana plants or the equivalent in dried marijuana, nor shall the Auditor
Controller or the Treasurer- Tax Collector approve any such requests for such
expenditures of public funds, or authorize or approve the issuance of any form
of payment should such expenditures be made.
Section 8: REPORTING
The Board of Supervisors shall instruct the SherlfPs Office and District
Attorney to report on December 1 of each year regsrdfng marijuana law
enforcement and prosecution activities engaged in by themselves and by
state, federal, andlor other law enforcement agencies within the County of
Mendocino.
Section 9: SERVERABILITY
The people of Mendocino County fntend that in case a court of competent
jurisdiction should find one or more of the above Sections illegal, the
remaining Sections rema/n in full force and effect,
District Attorney shall not prosecute any violations of the above state Health
and Safety Code sections nor seize any property in any single case involving
25 or fewer adult flowering female marijuana plants or the equivalent in drfed
marijuana.
Attuul ~ment # ~.
Petition to Board of Supervisors of Mendocino County
We urge you to place a measure before the voters on the June 3 ballot which will
repeal Measure G and make the limits for medical marijuana cultivation and
possession the same as those currently allowed by the State of California which is
6 mature plants or 8 ounces of dried marijuana per patient.
Also, we urge you to vote for final adoption of the ordinance which you
introduced on December 11, 2007, which declares that cultivation of more than 25
marijuana plants total per parcel is a public nuisance.
SIGN NAME I PRINT NAME
Please return by January 4, 2008 to Restore Mendocino/Repeal Measure G Coalition
759 S. State #114 Ukiah CA 95482. For information: RestoreMendocino@yahoo.com