HomeMy WebLinkAbouttecp_041503TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMITTEE
UKIAH CIVIC CENTER
Conference Room No. 3
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, California 95482
TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2003
3:00 P.M.
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER: Cotroneo, Harris, Lohse, Looney, Pilant, Seanor, Walker, and Chairman
Kageyama
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MARCH 18, 2003
III. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
The Traffic Engineering Committee welcomes input from the audience. In order for
everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not
more than 10 minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be
taken on non-agenda items.
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS:
IV. OLD BUSINESS
a. Discussion and possible action regarding issuance of commercial truck parking on Seminary
Avenue -Captain Chuck Yates, Ukiah Fire Department. (See Ordinance No. 1044).
V. NEW BUSINESS
a. Discussion and possible action regarding request to adopt an ordinance banning the
Segway Human Transporter from Sidewalks -Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works.
VI. COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
VIII. MISCELLANEOUS 1TEMS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Please call Kathy Kinch at 463-6214 if you are unable to attend the meeting.
The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably
accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request.
R:1\AGENDAS\TEC
A031803
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT A FUTURE DATE
Discussion and possible action regarding the installation of flashing lights at City crosswalks -John
Newfield.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMITTEE
MARCH 18, 2003
MINUTES
Michael F. Harris, Risk Manager/Budget Officer
David Lohse, Associate Planner II
Jim Looney, Public Works Supervisor
Doug Pilant, Public Member
Rick Seanor, Dep. Dir. of Public Works
Ben Kageyama, Chairman
MEMBERS ABSENT
Kevin Cotroneo, Public Member
Dan Walker, Ukiah Police Department
Robert Phillips
Kathy Kinch, Recording Secretary
The Traffic Engineering Committee meeting was called to order by Chairman Kageyama at 3:08 p.m.
Roll was taken with the results listed above.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: FEBRUARY 18, 2003
ON A MOTION by Member Looney, seconded by
voice vote of the members present, to approve the
Member Lohse abstained.
Member Seanor, it was carried by an all AYE
minutes of February 18, 2003, as submitted.
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS:
a. Discussion and possible action per request from Robert Phillips. Apha Analytical
Laboratories, reoardina the installation of a vellow loading zone next to the fire hvdrant in front of
208 Mason Street -Robert Phillips.
Member Seanor reported Staff received a request from Robert Phillips for the installation of a 20-
foot yellow loading zone along the frontage of Alpha Analytical Laboratories located at 208 Mason
Street. The yellow loading zone will allow customers to park along the frontage, for a short period
of time, to drop off various samples. There is an existing red curb and fire hydrant located to the
north. The proposed yellow loading zone would extend 20-feet from the red curb, leaving 36-feet
for on-street parking. There is an existing business to the south, which generates alot oflong-term
parking. The customers park in front of Alpha Labs making it difficult for Alpha Lab customers to
utilize the frontage for parking when dropping off samples.
Robert Phillips, of Alpha Analytical Laboratories, stated he would like to request an additional 25-
feet to the proposed 20-feet for a total of 45-feet. He advised there are four to five customers at a
time. He noted there have been no problems with the business to the south, and they are installing
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMITTEE MARCH 18, 2003
Page 1 of 3
a parking lot across the street.
Member Lohse stated a Use Permit has been submitted for the parking lot area. He advised a
"yellow loading zone means no stopping, standing, or parking at any time between 7:00 a.m. and
6:00 p.m. of any day except Sunday and Holidays, for any purpose other than the loading and
unloading of passengers or materials, provided that the loading or unloading of passengers shall not
consume more than three minutes nor the loading or unloading of materials more than 20 minutes."
He asked are customers parked in front for more than 20-minutes.
Mr. Phillips responded no. Parking is not more than 5 to 10-minutes. He advised there is a high
volume of customer traffic on Wednesday, as the Water Districts drop off samples throughout the
day.
Member Lohse asked is there any designated temporary parking.
Mr. Phillips responded there is an on-site parking lot used by UPS. He advised a sign would be
posted indicating additional parking on the side of the building.
Member Seanor stated a new building is being developed south of Alpha Labs. An existing
driveway for the new building may be closed, allowing additional on-street parking.
Member Harris asked what is the possibility of a 24-minute parking zone.
Member Looney advised Mr. Phillips initially requested a 24-minute parking zone. However, in
discussing the issue with Mr. Phillips it was decided a yellow loading zone would be a better use of
parking space, and consistent with City policy.
Member Lohse stated he would approve the yellow loading zone.
Chairman Kageyama stated "the loading or unloading of materials shall apply to commercial
deliveries, also the delivery or pickup of express and parcel post packages and United States mail."
He asked if the vehicle has to show a commercial plate.
Member Seanor responded no.
ON A MOTION by Member Harris, seconded by Member Seanor, it was carried by an all AYE voice
vote of the members present, that the Traffic Engineering Committee recommend to the City Council
approval of the request fora 20-foot yellow loading zone in front Alpha Analytical Laboratories
located at 208 Mason Street.
OLD BUSINESS
a. Uadate from Subcommittee reoarding oarkino and public safety issues in the neighborhood
of Dora Hiohland Standlev Clav and Smith Streets near Trinity School.
Member Seanor reported Fire Marshal Chuck Yates took pictures to show how narrow the streets
become when vehicles are parked on the street. He advised Staff is in the process of selecting a
Traffic Engineering consultant to perform aCity-wide Traffic Study. As part of the requirements the
consultant is asked to analyze and study this area and make recommendations to Staff.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMITTEE MARCH 18, 2003
Page 2 of 3
COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
Member Lohse stated there is a Walk-N-Roll Coalition meeting on Friday, March 20~' from 12:00
noon to 1:00 p.m. and will be held at the Ukiah Mendocino Brewery.
Member Pilant asked the status of the bridge at the end of North Orchard Avenue.
Member Seanor reported the City of Ukiah and County of Mendocino are jointly working together
on an agreement. Once the agreement has been signed, Staff will prepare the Environmental
Impact Report for certification, and then forward permit applications to Fish and Game and Army
Corps of Engineers for review and approval.
Member Seanor reported the striping contractor is scheduled to install reflector markers on State
Street north to the city limits, and install new white reflectors and non-reflective markers along the
lane lines.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
N/A
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 3:45 p.m.
~~~-
Cha'~r(ian en a ma
Kathy Kinch
Recording Secretary ~ `~
R:1\AGENDAS\TEC
M031803
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMITTEE MARCH 18, 2003
Page 3 of 3
~~~~~~L.~~~
„ ,,~.,
,, ;.. ,~
",,. _,,~
i` _
__ ~ ,%
ITEM NO. ab
DATE: March 19. 2003
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: REPORT CONCERNING POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF ANTI SEGWAY HUMAN
TRANSPORTER ORDINANCE
The Ukiah Police Department has been asked to report to the City Council regarding a
proposed Anti-Segway Human Transporter Ordinance for fhe City of Ukiah. Staff researched
the Segway device, SB 1918, existing vehicle codes, the proposed Anti-Segway Ordinance,
and solutions other cities are considering.
The Segway Human Transporterwill be available to the general public starting in March
and is currently being sold through Amazon.com at a starting price of $5,000. The SEGWAY
device is being offered in two formats, a commercial model that has an estimated top speed of
12.5 MPH and a consumer model which will have three options of top speeds, 5, 8, and 10
MPH. Buyers are currently required to take an orientation course from the company prior to
making a purchase, and the company does not recommend it's use by individuals under the
age of 16.
On September 26, 2002, Governor Gray Davis signed into law SB 1918 which regulates
the use of the Segway Human Transporter as an "electric personal assistive mobility device" or
EPAMD. An EPAMD has been defined as aself-balancing, non-tandem, 2-wheeled device that
can turn in place, designed to transport only one person at a maximum speed of less than 12.5
MPH. This law specifies that a "pedestrian" (as applied to the California Vehicle Code}
includes the user of an EPAMD.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer analysis of the Segway Human Transporter
ordinance to the Ukiah Traffic Engineerinq Committee.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: Provide staff with alternate direction.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with
Attachments;
N/A
Ukiah Police Department
Chris Dewey -Police Captain
Candace Horsley, City Manager and John Williams, Police Chief
1. Proposal from Jane Karda and Betty Green
2. Picture and specifications of the Segway
APPROVED:
anager
REPORT CONCERNING POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF ANTI SEGWAY HUMAN TRANSPORTER
ORDINANCE
March 19, 2003
Page 2
SB 1918 further requires that an EPAMD be equipped with front, rear and side
reflectors, a system that enables the driver to bring the device to a controlled stop, lamps for
nighttime visibility and a sound emitting device. SB 1918 also provides that local authorities
may adopt ordinances with respect to the time, place, and manner of operation of an EPAMD.
An Anti-Segway Model Ordinance has been proposed to the Ukiah City Council for
adoption that states:
(a) It shall be unlawful to operate an "electric personal assistive mobility device" as
defined in Section 313 of the Vehicle Code, on any sidewalk, walkway, pathway,
trail, multi-purpose shoulder lane, bridge, in or about a mall, parking lot,
multistoried parking structure, an airport or other pedestrian/transportation
facility which is under the jurisdiction of the City of Ukiah or County of
Mendocino.
(b) The term "pedestrian" shall not, for any purpose, be deemed to include an
"electric personal assistive mobility device", as defined in Sections 467 and 313
of the Vehicle Code.
(c) Any person who violates this ordinance shall be guilty of an infraction and, upon
the conviction therof, shall be punished for the first offense by a warning or a fine
of not less than $50 nor more than $100; and for a second offense and each
additional offense by a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $500.
As proposed, the model ordinance would make the operation of an EPAMD illegal
within the city limits of Ukiah. Because the EPAMD would not be able to flow with traffic, it
could not be legally operated on a residential roadway, and the proposed ordinance includes
bike lanes, sidewalks and other areas.
Proponents of the proposed ordinance state that the EPMAD poses a safety risk to
pedestrians: "We oppose the use and operation of an electrical personal assistive mobility
device (EPMAD) within the jurisdiction of the City of Ukiah or the County of Mendocino. Our
position is that it would be irresponsible to permit the operation of EPAMDs on our sidewalks
and within other pedestrian/transportation facilities in this community, until there are: a
thorough examination of state property and local municipality liability issues, independent
crash testing and safety data gathering, and any safety issues that are identified are
addressed by the manufacturer."
Jurisdictions throughout the State of California have been lobbied to study the issue of
EPAMDs, and enact ordinances similar to the ordinance proposed to the Ukiah City Council.
Currently, studies are being conducted in the San Diego/Los Angeles Area, the Sacramento
Region and the Bay Area and only one city has taken an official stance. The City of San
Francisco banned the use of the EPAMD on January 20'", 2003 over concerns that the
vehicles posed a safety risk to senior citizens and the disabled.
REPORT CONCERNING POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF ANT! SEGWAY HUMAN TRANSPORTER
ORDINANCE
March 19, 2003
Page 3
On March 12'h, 2003 the San Mateo Public Works Commission recommended to the San
Mateo City Council that EPAMDs be allowed within their jurisdictions at this time. The
Commission recommended that the city take a "wait-and-see" approach to regulations until
additional information was available. During this period, staff was instructed to monitor issues
that could arise involving liability insurance, police enforcement and Segway parking in
downtown areas of San Mateo.
The City of Sacramento and the City of Santa Cruz have studies underway to possibly
limit the use of the vehicle within specific areas of their cities. Santa Cruz's Traffic Engineer is
considering recommending a ban of use in specific commercial areas of the city. The City of
Belmont has begun to study their existing bicycle codes for possible modifications, which
would include the use of EPAMDs.
Also on March 12'h, 2003 the Sacramento Bee reported that although opposition groups
to the Segway have been the most vocal to this point, other groups representing seniors and
disabled persons have been studying uses for the EPAMD. The Executive Director of the
Area 4 Agency on Aging said that surveys indicate that a priority for older people is low cost
transportation options.
The Insurance Journal reported on March 6"', 2003 that insurance companies within
California are beginning to offer policies specifically tailored for the Segway device. Since the
EPAMDs were not designed for the street, most companies are exploring offering a special
endorsement to homeowners and vehicle policies for "low powered recreational vehicles".
Staff recommends that the City of Ukiah's Traffic Engineering Committee be asked to
study this issue and make recommendations to the City Council. The Traffic Engineering
Committee is made up of representatives from the Police, Public Works, Planning, and City
Manager Departments of the City, as well as community and public transportation
representatives. This committee conducts public meetings, and can solicit and receive
comment from members of our community, prior to providing a recommendation regarding the
proposed ordinance or other measures which may be taken concerning the use of EPAMDs
within the City of Ukiah.
ATTACHM.
To Whom It May Concern:
As citizens and pedestrians of TJkiah in Mendocino County, we aze concerned
about the use of the electric personal assistive mobility device, as defined in
section 313 of the vehicle code. This device has already been outlawed in the city
and county of San Francisco. These devices weigh up to 80 pounds. You can
imagine this combined with the weight of the operator and see the prospects of
serious injury in a collision with a pedestrian. However, at this time, there is no
law protecting the residents of Ukiah from the use of these vehicles on our city
sidewalks.
We are visually impaired persons living in Ukiab with concern for our personal
safety on city sidewalks because these vehicles, being electric, make no sound.
Making it impossible for us to avoid collision, if they are in our vicinity and aze
allowed on our sidewalks. These vehicles are not only a danger to people with
visual impairment but to all pedestrians young and old who travel the sidewalks
of Llkiah.
We are submitting additional supportive information to better convey our
concerns on this matter.
Jane Kardas Betty Green
1
Re: Opposition to SB 1918 -Segway Human Transporter as "Pedestrian"
On September 26, 2002 Governor Gray Davis signed into law SB 1918, which was
introduced by Senator Torlakson and sponsored by Segway, LLC, the manufacturer
of the Segway Human Transporter an "e]ectric personal assistive mobility device"
(EPAMD). This bill establishes regulations regazding the use of EPAMDs on
sidewadcs. The term "EPAMD" is defined as aself-balancing, non-tandem, 2-
wheeled device that can tum in place, designed to transport only one person at a
maximum speed of less than 12.5 miles per hour, as specified, The bill speci5es that
"pedestrian" includes a user of an EPAMD. An EPAMI' would be required, among
other things, to be equipped with front, rear, and side reflectors, a system that enables
the driver to bring the device to a controlled stop, lamps for nighttime visibility, and a
sound emitting device. SB 1918 would also provide that local authorities may adopt
ordinances with respect to the time, place, and manner of operation of EPAMDs, as
spcei5ed.
We oppose the use and operation of an electric personal assistive mobility device
(EPMAD) within the jurisdiction of the City of Ukiah or County of Mendocino. Our
position is that it would be irresponsible to permit the operation of EPAMDs on our
sidewalks and within other pedestrian transportation facilities in this community, until
there aze: a thorough exanvnation of state property and local municipality liability
issues, independent crash testing and safety data gathering, and any safety issues that
are identified are addressed by the manufacturer.
Ahhough there is a great deal of interest concerning the vehicle's potential use in the
state of California the American Association of Retired Persons, American Council of
the Blind, America Walks, Berkeley Rock Roll, California Congress of Seniors,
California Counc~7 of the Blind, Californians for Disability Rights, California WaIlcs,
City of Oakland, City of San Jose, Older Women's league, Senior Action Network,
and Walk San Francisco went on record opposing the passage of SB 1918 for the
following reasons:
The requirement contained in SB 1918, which designates an electric personal
assistive mob~7ity device, conwronty known as the "Segway Human Transporter"
as a `pedestrian", thus authorizing its use on a sidewalk, is highly inappropriate.
Currently, the only exception to the defurition of a pedestrian as a person who is
"afoot" is for an individual who utilizes a wheelchair or other mobility aid due to
a disabr7ity. The Seway Human Transporter cannot serve the same purpose as a
wheelchair or other mobr7ity aid for movement - in that it cannot be operated by
non-ambulatory individuals or individuals who do not have good balance and
eye/har~d coordination who often have no ahernative rneans of access. On the
other hand, the Segway user has alternative options e.g., motor vehicle, bicycle,
etc. to access their community, and the Segway would be used only to travel the
sidewalk more quickly.
2
2. This legislation creates severe hazazds to other pedestrians, including the frail,
elderly, children, and persons with disabilities, especially blind and deaf
individuals, who are not expecting such high-speed and extremely quiet vehicles
on sidewallcs. The Segway's high speed and noiseless features substantially
increase the risk of injury and even death to pedestrians. In addition, the
legislation fails to address whether pedestrians will have any legal recourse
against Segway users, including those who provide inadequate warning of the
approach of the Segway Human Transporter or who operate the device in a
negligent or reckless manner. Moveover, this legislation provides no way to
enforce speed limits set by local ordinances, especially since the speed governing
mechanism on the Segway can be easily over-ridden.
3. The Nation Safety Council has determined that the average reaction time for an
emergency-braking situation for a vehicle is '/, of a second. Even at 12 mph, a
Segway would trave 13 feet before tbe operator would initiate braking. The
Segway Company clairns that the scooter could then be stopped in an additional 5
feet, for a total stopping distance of 18 feet, which is inadequate to avoid hitting
another pedestrian, particularly on crowed walkways.
4. The Segway has not gone through crash testing by an independent evaluation
entity on human subjects, particularly pedestrians and worker. Injuries and death
from the Segway could result in a signiScarrt inflation of "deep pockets"
litigation Pedestrians could sue if injured on state or municipal owned sidewalks
for inadequate study of the dangers. Also, injured employees could sue under
CaIOSHA for the lack of any CaIOSHA testing of this device.
5. SB 1918 may set a precedent for sidewalk use by other uninsured motorized
vehicles, such as scooter- The severe safety hazards created by the Segway may
also discourage use of tbe sidewalks by others, thus adversely impacting the
lifestyle of our community and preventing those who walk to conduct many
nomral activities of darly living from fully participating in our society.
Finally, there aze unaddressed issues in Senate Brll 1918 regazding: operator license,
insurance, training, and age of Segway users, the regulation of the device that should
be required for the operation of the device (e.g. helmets, lights and reflectors, DLII),
and local jurisdictions prohibition of the use of the device.
In light of tbe foregoing, we join other groups and concerned citizens in asking the City
Council of the City of Ukiah or Boazd of Supervisors of the County of Mendocino to
adopt section (476), which would prohibit the use and operation of an electric personal
assistive mobility device (EPAMD) on any sidewalk, walkway, pathway, trail, muhi-
purpose shoulder lane, bridge, in or about a mall, parking bt, muhistoried pazking
structure, an airport or other pedestrian/irdasportation facility which is under the
jurisdiction of the City of Ukiah or County of Mendocino. Attached we submit for your
consideration an adoption, a model ordinance for the Prohibition of the "Electric Personal
Assislive Mobility Device" within the jurisdictio^ of the City of Ukiah or County of
Mendocino
3
Anti-Segway Model Ordinance with Appendix
Model Ordinance for the Protubition of the "Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Device
(Revised December 18, 2002)
Be it enacted by the City Council of the City of Ukiah or Board of Supervisors of the
County of Mendocino, as follows:
SECTION 313 ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES
(a) It shall be unlawful to operate an "electric personal assistive mobility device" as
defined in Section 313 of the Vehicle Code, on any sidewalk, wallcway, pathway,
trail, multi-purpose shoulder lane, bridge, in or about a mall, parking lot,
muhistoried pazking structure, an airport or other pedestrian/transportation facility
which is under the jurisdiction of the City of Ukiah or County of Mendocino.
(b) The term "pedestrian" shall not, for any purposed, be deemed to include and
"electric personal Assistive mobility device", as defined in Sections 467 and 313
oftbe Vehicle Code.
(c) Any person who violates this ordinance shall be guihy of an infraction and, upon
the conviction thereof, shall be punished for the first offense by a warning or a
Sne of not less than $50 nor more than $100; and for a second offense and each
additional offense by a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $500.
Appendix
Section 467 of tbe Vehicle Code is amended to read: 467 (a) A "pedestrian" is any
person who is afoot or who is using any of tbe following: (1) A means of conveyance
propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electric personnel assistive
mobility device as defined in Section 313. (b) "Pedestrian" includes any person who
is operating aself-propelled wheelchair, invalid tricycle, or motorized quadricycle
and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a
pedestrian, as spceified in subdivision (a). (c) Tbe amendments made by this section
shall become operative on March 1, 2003, and this section shall remain in effect only
until January 1, 2008, and as of that date is repealed, unless a Later enacted statute,
that is enacted before January 1, 2008, deletes or extends that date-
Section 313 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 313. (a) The term "electric
personal assistive mobility device" or "EPAMD" means aself-balancing, non-tandem
two-wheeled device, that can turn in place, designed to transport only one person,
with an electric propulsion system averaging less than 750 watts (1 horsepower), tbe
maxunum speed of which, wben powered solely by a propulsion system on a paved
level surface, is less than 12.5 miles per hour. (b) This section shall become operative
on March 1, 2003 and remain if effect only until January 1, 2008, and as of that date
is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2008,
deletes or extends that date.
4
WalkSacramento
909 -12"' street
Sacramento, CA 95814
January 28, 2003
The Honorable Heather Fargo
Mayor, City of Sacramento
9151 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Mayor Fazgo:
It is our understanding that the City Council is considering banning the operation of
Segway scooters on the K Street Mall. We urge you to broaden this prohibition, as
allowed under recent California legislation, to ban the operation of Segway scooters
on all sidewallcs within the City of Sacramento.
Below are some of the reasons we beheve Segway scooters are inherently dangerous
to pedestrians and should be banned from all sidewalks.
• California legislation (SB 1918) allows Segway scooters to travel up to 12.5
mph on sidewalks. They can travel up to 20 mph. Typical walking speeds on
sidewalks are 3 mph. Having a vehicle L7ce the Segway travel 4 times faster
than the pedestrian traffic is not safe.
• Pedestrians are not regulated traffic on a sidewalk aad do not travel in a
straight line. Vehicles moving at up to 12.5 mph should not be mixed with
pedestrians.
^ The National Safety Council has determined that the average reaction time for
an emergency braking situation for a vehicle is '/. of a second. Even at 12
mph, a Segway would travel 13 feet before the operator would initiate
braking- The Segway company claims that the scooter could then be stopped
in an additional 5 fcet, for a total stopping distance of 18 feet.
• If the combined mass of the operator plus the Segway itself (831bs) hit a
pedestrian at 12.5 mph it could cause severe and possibly fatal injury. Our
elderly citizens are at particularly high risk.
• Compared with outside ambient noise, Segways travel virtually silent. They
therefore pose a particular hazard to our blind and visually impaired citizens.
• Segway users are not required to have insurance even though the vehicles they
operate are inherently dangerous to pedestrians.
• Despite claims of safe operation made by the Segway company, there have
bcen no independent scientific studies on the safety of Segways operating on
sidewalks to validate such claims.
• There is no practical way to enforce the operation of Segways on our
sidewalks. It is too much to expect Sacramento Police to enforce a speed limit
5
or safe operation of these vehicles on sidewalks. It is difficuh enough for
them to enforce speed limits and safe driving on our roads.
Based on the above, we request the Council prepare and pass and Ordinance that
will ban the operation of Segway scooters on all City sidewalks.
As you may know, the city and county of Sacramento in recent years has had the
distinction of being on of the most dangerous places for pedestrians in the state.
The City has recently taken positive steps to make Sacramento more walkable and
safer for pedestrians by (1) accelerated implementation of curb cuts; (2)
development of new Street Standards; (3) drafting of a Pedestrian Safety Report;
and (4) preparation of a Pedestrian Master Plan.
We applaud these efforts, but feel strongly that allowing Segway scooters to be
operated on sidewalks is a significant step backwar in the progress being made.
Sincerely,
Ron Anderson
President
Cc: Council members, City of Sacramento
Dean Karnen has some awftilly impressive accomplishments under his belt. The
self-taught inventor has made millions on such breakthrough devices as a stent to
keep arteries clear and a portable dialysis machine for kidney patients. So will he
notch up another win with his latest project, the much-hyped Segway Human
Transporter?
A year after the Segway was unveiled in a flurry of cover stories and network
morning show appearances, the scooter Ends itself with more detractors than
customers. Consumer and health advocated warn of possible injuries and rising
obesity. City governments worry about chaos on their sidewalks. And key execs
are heading for the exits. All that before the scooter is even available to
consumers.
OUT IN'I"I~ COLD
Workers at businesses and municipalities that have tested the transporters azen't
exactly sending in rave reviews, either. "You can't kcep warm if you're not
walking," says a postal worker in Concord, N.H. "You end up like a frozen
Popsicle on a stick."
In the latest sign that all is not well with privately held Segway, its president,
George Muller, the highly regarded former president of Subaru America, resigned
in late December after less than a yeaz on the job. Muller said he left because he
decided he didn't want to uproot his farmly by moving closer to the company's
Manchester N.H. headquarters. That may be. But his resignation also came right
after Vernon R. Loucks Jr., a close friend of Kamen's and former CEO of Baxter
International, was named CEO. Says Muller of his next move: "I' like to have the
top job."
Muller's departure comes as a blow to the company, which was counting on his
automotive sales and marketing expertise to help launch the Segway. And it
follows earlier turmoil at the young company. The prior president and three
senior marketing execs have quit in tbe past two years. "I was disappointed that
he left," says Karnen of Muller. "He has a bt of experience with dealerships,
marketing, and disinbution, and sooner or later, the company has to go there.
Make that later. Kamen says the platmed Mazch launch of sales via Amazon.com
remains on track- The online retailer will be the exclusive seller of the scooter,
which will retail for 54,950 on the site. The company has no plans as yet to sell
the Segway in stores. "Should we sell it h7ce consumer products or cars or jet skis
or snowmobiles?" says Kamen "1t's not clear, so we're looking at various
options.
HITTING THE BRAKES
Until the company Sgures that one out, it seems to be placing ils hopes on selling
to the cash-strapped bcal governments that have dissed the vehicle as a potential
hazazd. In December, San Francisco banned it, while Sacramento, Santa Cruz,
7
and other California cities are considering similar action Some big states,
including Massachusetts, New York, and Texas, have yet to make the scooter
legal on their sidewallcs. And though its top speed is 12 mph, pending legislation
elsewhere would restrict it to 7 mph.
Cover stories and morning talk shows put the Segway on the map a year ago. But
its chances of becoming the little scooter that could look increasingly iffy.
By: Faith Keenan in Boston
Cc: City Managers Office
Engineering Department
Police Department
City Council
Boazd of Supervisors
Sheriff-Coroner Department
Transportation
8
Segway ~ Print ~ Page 1 of 1
gTTG,CHML _
CLOSE i
5^op _xcluslve Lumted-ilme Urler
Be one of the first consumers to
own the revolutionary SegwayTM'
Human Transporter (HT)-the
world's frst electric, self-balancing
transportation device! Available at
Amazon.com for a limited time, this
is how the general public may
purchase a Segway HT i167, our
highest performing model. Offer
includes training with introductory
first ride, limited warranty, price
guarantee and more.
Visit Amazon.com now topurchase!
All purchasers of the Segway HT
will receive a unique gift as a part of
this exclusive offer. Designed
especially for this offer, this
colledor+s print captures the spirit
and individuality of the Segway
design philosophy.
• Price: $4950
• Deposit: $495 (non-refundable)
• Delivery period: March 1, 2003 to July 31, 2003
Important notice: Purchaser (or the person to whom the Segway HT is to be
shipped) must attend Segway provided training and completely and carefully
review all user materials provided by Segway before using the Segway HT. The
Segway HT has not been designed, tested, or approved as a medical device.
Riders must be able to step on and off the Segway HT, requiring physical
abilities similar to climbing and descending stairs.
SEGWIRY
Copyright ®2001-2003 Segway LLC. All rights reserved.
Printed from http://wwwsegway.com/shop/amazon.himl
http://wwwsegway.com/cgi-bin/prinLcgi?referer-http%3A//www. segway.com/shop/amaz... 3/ 13/2003
~ ..
Offer Details
~~.~; + ,;_, ~'~~u rrn;;urt offerings, optmilzed for:
O Series: O Series:
cargo carrying. range and terrain.
n , Every Segway HT has three distinct keys that riders may choose from depending on riding environment and
i
level of experience. The Beginner key (max. speed of b mph and slowest turning ratel. allows riders to gain
confidence using the machine. The Sidewalk Operation key Imax. speed of 8 mph and a medium turning ratel.
allows riders to adapt well in pedestrian environments. The Open Environment key Imax. speed of 12.5 mph
and the most responsive turning rate), allows riders to comfortably cover open spaces.
~ 5-75m{
While a Segway HT's optimal range is 15 miles 125 kml, accounting for a variety of real world conditions we
expect you'll be able to travel about 10 miles (16 kml on a single battery charge. Under severe conditions -
such as rugged terrain or variable speed - we expect you will be able to travel about 5 mites IB kml. Under
optimal conditions, however - no wind, flat terrain, and at constant speed -you could travel as far as 15 miles
125 kml.
V, ,` ' ~ ..
' ~ One characteristic of a pedestrian is the ability to turn in place without impacting any nearby person or object,
~ ~ something no vehicle can do. By balancing on a single axle, Segway HT users act no differently than pedestrians.
- .' ~ The wheels have the ability to rotate in opposite directions, which enables the machine to turn in place.
e,,
> ;- ;,S
.„ ga~" O it i O _ .~..;I
'"y?`: C
In order for Segway HT to be the optimal local travel solution, it has to have carrying capaaty for users,
packages, and cargo.
<>
I I O O
I .I
1. I
1 I i45 ~:%.. rn~7 i4E ~. 6G crr~)
We designed Segway HT to take up no more space than the average person. It's no wider than a person's
shoulders and raises you only 8 inches off the ground.
I
~ Portability was a key design objective. That is why we made Segway HT light enough to handle, small enough
to store two in the trunk of a midsize sedan, and collapsible enough to fit in tight storage spaces.
~~C~-i~.~Q ~_
February 12, 2003
9:05 am
I spoke to Eugene Lazaro in Sacramento this morning. He is a Board Member of
the California Council of the Blind and Chairman of its Access & Transportation
Committee.
In September 2002, SB 1918 was passed and it will be implemented on March 1,
2003. The bill amends the vehicle code to include Segway's to operate on
sidewalks. There is no provision prohibiting them from operating on the street or
in bike lanes. The California Council of the Blind is campaigning that these
devices be prohibited from use on sidewalks due to the possible danger to
pedestrians, especially blind people.
Cities in California have an option to ban this type of transportation by enacting
an ordinance or other ruling prohibiting them from operating on sidewalks. The
city of San Francisco's Board of Supervisors held a public hearing in November
2002 on this matter and adopted an ordinance prohibiting them from use on
sidewalks. The ordinance was effective January 2003. It is Mr. Lazaro's
understanding that the city of Berkeley, Santa Clara County and Sacramento
County are currently reviewing the Segway device and it is thought that they, too,
will ban them.
A Segway costs about $5,000. Use of a Segway does not require the operator
to have a drivers license, insurance, or that the operator wear a helmet.
Municipalities are concerned with liability issues if a Segway operator had an
accident due to uneven sidewalk that they may be sued for damages. Property
owners are also concerned with the liability issue.
Since there is no deadline for implementing a ban on these devices, perhaps the
proponents (Jane Kardas and Betty Green) could provide Council with a
presentation on the February 19th meeting under Audience Comments on Non-
Agenda Items. If Council is interested in pursuing the matter, they can then
direct staff to agendize the matter for a meeting in March. I have attached a
photo of the Segway that I downloaded from their web site (www.segway.com).
Marie Ulvila, Ciry Clerk
Segway
Page 1 of 2
NOME I SEOWAY NT I SHOP I CONNECT I SUPPOi
V
Welcome to the evotutiars in mobit'sty.
Cover mare ground. Be moro productive. Move mare inteltigentlr.
Pre-order now at Amazon.com
An exclusive, limited-time offer to reserve your own
SegwayT"' Human Transporter (HT) today.
Your Segway stories
Personal stories from the growing number of Segway HT
owners, in their own words.
Expand your world
Segway helps you cover more ground in less time. Interact
with a map of your neighborhood to see.
:, .
Your return on investment
Run your business through our calculator and see how
'. Segway HT will work for you.
> SEBwAY IN THE NEwS
Segway HTs Coming to
L.os Angeles County_
MTA begins testing
Segway HTs for security
details at key transit
stations.
Segway Initiates
Community Stud roof
egwayT" HT Riders
__ ..
Study to take placein
Celebration, Florida and
will last one year.
Keolis Group and
Segway Form_
Partnership
_..
The partnership will offer
Segway'"' HTs as a
transportation solution in
France.
Hnme I Site Map ; Hulp Search (Email to a Rientl Contact Us
Legal Terms antl Conditions Privacy Policy -Updated
Copyright ~g 2001-2003 Segway LLC. All rights reserved.
htto://wwwseewav.com/
- i ~ ~.
2/12/O'i
is Segway going anywnere~
move: "I'd like to have the top job."
Muller's departure comes as a blow to the
company, which was counting on his automotive sales-
and-marketing expertise to help launch the Segway.
And it follows earlier turmoil at the young company.
The prior president and three senior marketing execs
have quit in the past two yeazs. "I was disappointed that
he ]eft," says Kamen of Mullers. "He has a lot of
experience with dealerships, marketing, and
distribution, and sooner or later, the company has to go
there."
Make that later. Kamen says the planned March
launch of sales via Amazon.com remains on track. The
online retailer will be the exclusive seller of the scooter,
which will retail for $4,950 on the site. The company
has no plans as yet to sell the Segway in stores. "Should
we sell it like consumer products or cars or jet skis or
snowmobiles?" says Kamen. "It's not clear, so we're
looking at various options."
- .
The Segway scoo#er
OVERALL SPECS
TOP SPEED: 12.5 mph
RANGE: Appro%. 11 roilcs On
fDll charge
sasE wrDTM:19 x z5 inch
footprint
NEiGNT: Approx. 3.5 feet
wE1GMT: 65-10.80 lbs.
Pwr~owo:2501bs.for
passengers; 751bs. for cargo
MANUiACTURER: Segway LLC,
Mattchesler, NH
wvwruaruTr: Late 2002
Gick on area on left for a
closer look at how the
gyroscopiy battery-
powered scooter works.
SarcergiapM~: Ss7nay LtC
r arc / ~i /
Model Ordinance for the Prohibition of the "Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Device"
Atlvertisement Until the company figures that one out, it seems to
1vIS1\' Shopprng: be placing its hopes on selling to the cash-strapped local
,.•-~ govermnents that have dissed the vehicle as a potential
'~ ~~ •'r ~ hazazd. In December, San Francisco banned it, while
~~ ~ Sacramento, Santa Cruz, and other California cities are
considering similar action. Some big states, including
Shop for what's hot Massachusetts, New York, and Texas, have yet to make
~ the scooter legal on their sidewalks. And though its top
http://w~~~~.msnbo,com/news/860807.asp 1/21/2003
v CHASSIS
~'.;_,bi%.ti V VCC C 21.^ti. ApCC` Cd'_OhS _ AeC CS
sage t o` ,
NOME I SEOWAY NT SHOP I CONNECT I SUPPORT A60U7 US
Seaway H7 MctieL F?< ;}~ecfie~sticn6 ; I Series
The Segwayi° HT i Seres features a powerful battery for
eMendetl speetl and tinge, as well as large wheels and low-
pressure tires far enhancetl pertormance in vanable terrain. Dirt,
grass, hills, and uneven pavement are all readily navigated with
the powerful i Series motlel.
Performance:
Top speed and turning rate
The maximum forward speetl and fuming rate of your Segway HT can
be set at different values based upon which key is used
• Beginner Key (black):
Maximum speed: 8 mph (g.5 km/h)
Slower turning rate
~ )5-15 mr
• Sidewalk Key (yellow):
Maximum speetl: 6 mph (12.6 km/h)
Metlium fuming rate
• Open Environment Key (red):
Maximum speetl: 12.5 mph (20 km/h)
Most responsive fuming rate
Range:
Up to 15 miles (25 km) on a single charge
Accounting for a vanery of real-wontl wnditions we expect you'll
be able to travel about 10 miles (16 km) on a single battery
charge. Under severe contlitions-such as rugged tenain or
variable speetl- we expect you will be able to !revel about 5 miles
(6 km). Under optimal centlitions, however-no wing fiat temain
and at constant speetl-you could travel as much as 15 miles (25
km).
.. Turning Radius: Zero
'~" One characteristic of a petlestrian is the ability to turn in place
^~. without impacting any nearby person or object, something no
vehiUe can do. By balancing on a single axle, Segway HT users
i ~' act no tlifferently than petlestnans. The wheels have the ability to
~"" y'' rotate in opposite directions, which enables the machine to turn in
'kl.. _. Place.
Payload:
Passenger: 250 Ibs (110 kg)
The Segway HT is the optimal short-tlistance travel solution, with
``--/ '4=.. ~ the capacity to carry up to a 250 Ib. atlult.
~` "'~, Space:
~« Platform height: 8 inches {20 cm)
Footprint: 19 x 25 inches (48 x 64 cm)
We designed Segway HT to take up no more space than the
s average person. It'S no witler than a person's shoulders antl raises
you only a inches off the ground.
Weight:
ISCR@a
Range and terrain.
e Saries
Cargo ranging.
om dspn Chan
V ew all modals sitle-
by-side.
A Closer Loo4
Models 6
Sped'icaDOns
Accessories
BUarnESa ri0t4hOna
Persenat SoluHOns
http://wwwsegway.com/segway/specs_iseries.html 4/10/2003
~e;_,~~ay v vac ~ a^,.. ~occ cax_ons ~er~.c~
~..-..,~ S;. 165 (lit :cg
r""H fr t• ~ Portability was a key design objective. Thal's why we matle
f)i[ `"'~': ~.' j Segway HT light enough to handle, small enough to store in the
#~' tt~'F-J~I ~ trunk of a midsize sedan, antl collapsible enough to ft in tight
stn age spaces
~' ~ Power:
Nkcsel Mtaal Hydride (NiMH} Battery Packs
/ I" The i Series has been outfitted with two 80 cell NiMH battery
-.~.. ; packs. The batteries are designed with on-board electronics that
1~ automatically mondor botlr the cond'N'on and temperature OF the
~•a- y ~,,. batteries. Batteries can De re-charged by utilizing any 90 to 260
volt and 50 to 60 H2 AC outlet (typically accessible in most
countries) A complete cycle charge will take lour to six hours,
' which at 10 Cents per KW-h, equates t0 less than 10 cents of
electricity NiMH batteries are designed far approximately 300-500
Lull charge/discharge cycles.
Range, battery life and recharge times can be affected by factors
such as terrain, temperature, speed of operation, rider weight and
load, proper storage techniques and environmental conditions.
Safety:
~
~ Redundant electrical systems.
~
+~ Robust mechanics! systems.
!;' Safety is our top priority in both tlesign antl operation. To help
ensure that both Segway HT users and those near them remain
' sate, we built redundancy into the balancing and electrical
-~ systems. If any system begins operating at diminished capacity,
the other is programmed to assume responsibility all the while
maintaining balance while Segway HT slows down to quickly and
safely Shut down.
Aircraft design stantlards were implemerttetl in building Se9way
HT's mechanical structures, and each part has been thoroughly
tested and analyzed to ensure such high standards were me[.
Segway HT Interactive Mgtlel
Explore Segway HT's components
Product Soecificatpns (PDF)
faDr
Email ihic
to a friend
.__ ~ n r t,>:. ,~c^ -into<•.;<
Print-friendly
version
http: (1www.segway.com/segwayf specs_iseries.html
"age ~ of
-~~,1'i~i~f i1
4110!2003
STEM IVa
ORDINANCE N0. 1044
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
UKIAH ADDING SECTION 7154.5 TO THE UKIAH CITY
CODE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES THAT
ARE SIX FEET OR MORE IN HEIGHT ON CERTAIN
STREETS OR PORTIONS THEREOF.
The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows:
SECTION ONE
Section 7154.5 is hereby added to Article 10 of Chapter 1 of Division 8 of the Ukiah
City Code to read as follows:
§ 7154.5 NO PARKING OF VEHICLES SIX FEET OR MORE IN HEIGHT
IN LOCATIONS DESIGNATED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION: It shall
be unlawful and constitute a violation of this Article to park or allow to stand any vehicle
that is six feet or more in height (including any load thereon) on certain streets or portions
thereof, during all or certain hours of the day as designated by resolution of the City
Council. The City Traffic Engineer shall erect signs providing notice of any such
prohibition in accordance with the provisions of Section 7160.
SECTION TWO
This Ordinance shall be published as required by law in a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ukiah.
SECTION THREE
This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption.
Introduced by title only on March 5, 2003, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rodin, Andersen, Smith, Baldwin, and Mayor Larson.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
Adopted on March 19, 2003 by the following roll call vote:
ORDINANCE N0.
Page 1 of 2
Adopted on March 19, 2003 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rodin, Andersen, Smith, Baldwin, and Mayor Larson.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None. l^~;
/ .,
Eric Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marie Ulvila, City Clerk
City of Ukiah, California
Cert/i~fi~ed To Be A/True and Ex/act Copy/
Date MWN UMW. City Ciak
ORDINANCE NO.
Page 2 of 2
Senate Bill No. 1918
CHAPTER 979
An act to amend, repeal, and add Sections 407.5 and 467 of, to add and
repeal Section 313 of, and to add and repeal Article 6 (commencing with
Section 21280) of Chapter 1 of Division I1 of, the Vehicle Code, relating
to vehicles.
[Approved by Governor September 26, 2002. Filed
with Secretary of State September 27, 2002.]
LEGISLATNE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 1918, Torlakson. Vehicles: electric personal assistive mobility
devices.
(1) Existing law regulates the use and operation of vehicles, including
2-wheeled, electric propelled devices such as scooters. Under existing
law, among other requirements, a motorized scooter is required to be
equipped with a specified type of braking system and, if operated on a
highway in dazkness, with specified lamps for visibility.
This bill would establish regulations regazding the use of electric
personal assistive mobility devices. The term "electric personal
assistive mobility device" or "EPAMD" would be defined as a
self-balancing, nontandem, 2-wheeled device, that can turn in place,
designed to transport only one person at a maximum speed of less than
12.5 miles per hour, as specified. This bill would also specify that
"pedestrian" includes a user of an electric personal assistive mobility
device. An electric personal assistive mobility device would be required,
among other things, to be equipped with front, rear, and side reflectors,
a system that enables the driver to bring the device to a controlled stop,
lamps for nighttime visibility, and a sound emitting device. This bill
would also provide that local authorities may adopt ordinances with
respect to the time, place, and manner of operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, as specified, and that state agencies may limit
or prohibit the time, place, and manner of their use on state property. The
bill also makes findings regazding the advantages of electric personal
assistive mobility devices in promoting productivity, minimizing
environmental impacts, and facilitating better use of public ways. The
bill would provide that its provisions shall not become operative until
March 1, 2003, and shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2008, and
as of that date are repealed. Because a violation of these provisions
would be a crime, the bill would impose astate-mandated local program.
92
Ch. 979 - 2 -
(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.
Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act
for a specified reason.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 313 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
313. (a) The term "electric personal assistive mobility device" or
"EPAMD" means aself-balancing, nontandem two-wheeled device,
that can turn in place, designed to transport only one person, with an
electric propulsion system averaging less than 750 watts (1 horsepower),
the maximum speed of which, when powered solely by a propulsion
system on a paved level surface, is less than 12.5 miles per hour.
(b) This section shall become operative on March 1, 2003, and remain
in effect only until January I , 2008, and as of that date is repealed, unless
a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2008, deletes or
extends that date.
SEC. 2. Section 407.5 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
407.5. (a) A "motorized scooter" is any two-wheeled device that
has handlebars, is designed to be stood or sat upon by the operator, and
is powered by an electric motor that is capable of propelling the device
with or without human propulsion. For purposes of this section, an
electric personal assistive mobility device, as defined in Section 313, a
motorcycle, as defined in Section 400, amotor-driven cycle, as defined
in Section 405, a motorized bicycle or moped, as defined in Section 406,
or a toy, as defined in Section 108550 of the Health and Safety Code, is
not a motorized scooter.
(b) A device meeting the definition m subdivision (a) that is powered
by a source other than electrical power is also a motorized scooter.
(c) (1) Every manufacturer of motorized scooters shall provide a
disclosure to buyers that advises buyers that their existing insurance
policies may not pmvide coverage for these scooters and that they should
contact their insurance company or insurance agent to determine if
coverage is provided.
(2) The disclosure required under paragraph (1) shall meet both ofthe
following requirements:
(A) The disclosure shall be printed in not less than 14-point boldface
type on a single sheet of paper that contains no information other than
the disclosure.
92
- 3 - Ch. 979
(B) The disclosure shall include the following language in capital
letters:
"YOUR INSURANCE POLICIES MAY NOT PROVIDE
COVERAGE FOR ACCIDENTS INVOLVING THE USE OF THIS
SCOOTER. TO DETERMINE IF COVERAGE IS PROVIDED,
YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY OR
AGENT."
(d) The amendments made by this section shall become operative on
March 1, 2003, and this section shall remain in effect only until January
1, 2008, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
is enacted before January 1, 2008, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3. Section 407.5 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
407.5. (a) A "motorized scooter" is any two-wheeled device that
has handlebars, is designed to be stood or sat upon by the operator, and
is powered by an electric motor that is capable of propelling the device
with or without human propulsion. For purposes of this section, a
motorcycle, as defined in Section 400, amotor-driven cycle, as defined
in Section 405, a motorized bicycle or moped, as defined in Section 406,
or a toy, as defined in Section 108550 of the Health and Safety Code, is
not a motorized scooter.
(b) A device meeting the definition in subdivision (a) that is powered
by a source other than electrical power is also a motorized scooter.
(c) (1) Every manufacturer of motorized scooters shall provide a
disclosure to buyers that advises buyers that their existing insurance
policies may not provide coverage for these scooters and that they should
contact their insurance company or insurance agent to determine if
coverage is provided.
(2) The disclosure required under pazagraph (1) shall meet both of the
following requirements:
(A) The disclosure shall be printed in not less than 14-point boldface
type on a single sheet of paper that contains no information other than
the disclosure.
(B) The disclosure shall include the following language in capital
letters:
"YOUR INSURANCE POLICIES MAY NOT PROVIDE
COVERAGE FOR ACCIDENTS INVOLVING THE USE OF THIS
SCOOTER. TO DETERMINE IF COVERAGE IS PROVIDED, YOU
SHOULD CONTACT YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY OR
AGENT."
92
Ch. 979 - 4 -
(d) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2008.
SEC. 4. Section 467 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
467. (a) A "pedestrian" is any person who is afoot or who is using
any of the following:
(1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a
bicycle.
(2) An electric personnel assistive mobility device as defined in
Section 313.
(b) "Pedestrian" includes any person who is operating a
self-propelled wheelchair, invalid tricycle, or motorized quadricycle
and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about
as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision (a).
(c) The amendments made by this section shall become operative on
Mazch 1, 2003, and this section shall remain in effect only until January
1, 2008, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
is enacted before January 1, 2008, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 5. Section 467 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
467. (a) A "pedestrian" is any person who is afoot or who is using
a means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle.
(b) "Pedestrian" includes any person who is operating a
self-propelled wheelchair, invalid tricycle, or motorized quadricycle
and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about
as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision (a).
(c) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2008.
SEC. 6. Article 6 (commencing with Section 21280) is added to
Chapter 1 of Division 11 of the Vehicle Code, to read:
Article 6. Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Devices
21280. (a) The Legislature finds and declazes the following:
(1) This state has severe traffic congestion and air pollution problems,
particulazly in its cities, and finding ways to reduce these problems is of
paramount importance.
(2) Electric personal assistive mobility devices that meet the
definition contained in Section 313 operate solely on electricity and
employ advances in technology to safely integrate the user in pedestrian
transportation.
(3) Electric personal assistive mobility devices would enable
California businesses, public officials, and individuals to travel farther
and carry more without the use of traditional vehicles, thereby
promoting gains in productivity, minimizing environmental impacts,
and facilitating better use of public ways.
92
- 5 - Ch. 979
(b) The Legislature is adding this article as part of its program to
promote the use of no-emission transportation.
21280.5. For purposes of this article, an electric personal assistive
mobility device is defined in Section 313.
21281. Every electric personal assistive mobility device, or
EPAMD, shall be equipped with the following safety mechanisms:
(a) Front, rear, and side reflectors.
(b) A system that enables the operator to bring the device to a
controlled stop.
(c) If the EPAMD is operated between one-half hour after sunset and
one-half hour before sunrise, a lamp emitting a white light that, while the
EPAMD is in motion, illuminates the azea in front of the operator and
is visible from a distance of 300 feet in front of the EPAMD.
(d) A sound emitting device that can be activated from time to time
by the operator, as appropriate, to alert nearby persons.
21282. Notwithstanding Section 21966, for the purpose of assuring
the safety of pedestrians, including seniors, persons with disabilities,
and others using sidewalks, bike paths, pathways, trails, bike lanes,
streets, roads, and highways, a city, county, or city and county may, by
ordinance, regulate the time, place, and manner of the operation of
electric personal assistive mobility devices as defined in Section 313,
and their use as a pedestrian pursuant to pazagraph (2) of subdivision (a)
of Section 467, including limiting, prohibiting entirely in the local
jurisdiction, or prohibiting use in specified areas as determined to be
appropriate by local entities. State agencies may limit or prohibit the
time, place, and manner of use on state property.
21283. This article shall become operative on March 1, 2003, and
shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2008, and as of that date is
repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1,
2008, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 7. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the
only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will
be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates
a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction,
within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or
changes the de£mition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of
Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
O
92
CITY OF UKIAH
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 10, 2003
TO: Traffic Engineering Committee
FROM: Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Request for Ordinance Banning Segway from Sidewalks
Agenda Item va
REQUEST: On March 19, 2003, Captain Chris Dewey presented a report to the City
Council regarding the possible adoption of an "Anti Segway Human Transporter
Ordinance". Jane Kardas and Betty Green brought this issue to the attention of the City
Council out of concern for the potential interaction between the Segway with visually
impaired and other pedestrians. The City Council received the report from Chris Dewey
and referred the matter to the Traffic Engineering Committee (TEC) for further evaluation.
DISCUSSION: Attached is a copy of the agenda report prepared by Chris Dewey
regarding the proposed ordinance. With the agenda report is a packet of information
supplied by Jane Kardas and Betty Green. In addition, attached is a copy of Senate Bill
1918 which was referenced in the material.
Given that the Segway operating speed, up to 12.5 mph (maximum), is approximately four
and one-half times as fast as pedestrian walking speed, it is likely that there is a potential
for conflicts if the Segway is operated on sidewalks. However, since the current market
price for a Segway is approximately $5,000 it is doubtful that Ukiah will experience an influx
of Segway in the near future. Also, should motorized skateboards, scooters, etc. be
banned from sidewalks?
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the TEC discuss the issue and determine
whether to recommend adoption of an ordinance.
Attachment
cc: file
e~~~ ofuk~a~
April 10, 2003
Mr. Troy Stalker
1130 ELM ST
UKIAH, CA 95482-3939
RE: Request for 3-way stop Smith Street at School Street
Dear Mr. Stalker:
The City of Ukiah recently received your request for athree-way stop at the subject
intersection, Please be advised that on March 20, 2001 the City of Ukiah Traffic
Engineering Committee (TEC) discussed installing stop signs at the subject intersection.
At that meeting, the TEC recommended that the issue be considered in the proposed
Citywide Traffic Circulation Study.
The City is currently in the process of selecting a consultant engineering firm to complete
this study. As part of the Traffic Circulation Study, the consultant will complete an analysis
of intersections and stop sign requirements throughout the core area of Ukiah.
Thank you for your interest in this traffic concern. Please do not hesitate to contact me at
(707) 463-6296 if you have further questions.
Sincerely,
,l dy~ ~~ C~-~
Richard J. Seanor
Deputy Director of Public Works
Staff to the Traffic Engineering Committee
cc: Diana Steele, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
Tim Eriksen, Civil Engineer
Traffic Engineering Committee
file
300 SEMINARY AVENUE UKIAH, CA 95482-5400
Phone# 707/463-6200 Fax# 707/463-6204 Web Address: www.cityofukiah.com
Richard J. Seanor, PE
his letter is to request a 3-way stop nn the corner of N. School and W. Smith streets
I feel that it would make that corner u little more safer when you Cross that tntersection
from W. Smith. Because of the parking on School St. its hard to see u car coming going
north on School, especially if there is a van or u truck parked on that corner. "!'here may
have fieen some close culls or a few acctdents in the past. / fielive that making it a 3-way
stop will reduce any more feature close calls.
'T'hank you,
Troy Stalker
1130 Elm Street
Ukiah Ca. 95482
707 -162-2782
707 367-0374