HomeMy WebLinkAbouttecm_091603Minutes
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMITTEE
September 16, 2003
Members Present
Ben Kageyama, Chairman
Dave Lohse
Jim Looney
Dan Walker
Mike Harris
Rick Seanor
Doug Pilant
Others Present
Jane Kardas
Betty Green
Michelle Leoni
Staff Present
Cathy Elawadly, Recording Secretary
Members Absent
Kevin Cotroneo
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kageyama at 3:00 p.m. in
Conference Room No. 3, Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah,
California.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: -June 17, 2003 and July 15, 2003
ON A MOTION by Member Mike Harris, seconded by Member Doug Pilant, it
was carried by an all AYE voice vote of the Members present to approve the
June 17, 2003 notes, as submitted.
Member Jim Looney recommended the following change to the July 15, 2003
minutes:
Page 5, Paragraph 7, reads, "Member Looney stated the course of planning
implementation for appropriate traffic calming features/structures requires going
through the grant funding process, stating such a project is also time consuming
in terms of conducting studies and design development," be amended to read,
"Member Looney stated the course of planning implementation for appropriate
traffic calming features/structures is time consuming in terms of conducting
studies and design development."
ON A MOTION by Member Mike Harris, seconded by Member Looney, it was
carried by an all AYE voice vote of the Members present to approve the July 15,
2003 minutes, as amended.
ABSTAIN: Doug Pilant
III. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
No one from the audience came forward.
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 1
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS:
IV. OLD BUSINESS
a. Discussion and possible action regarding request for ordinance
banning Segway from sidewalks.
Member Rick Seanor reported at the April 15, 2003 Traffic Engineering
Committee (TEC) meeting there was extended discussion concerning issues
related to Segway, whereby additional research was requested for consideration
by the Committee at a later date. He drew attention to a series of reference
materials in the staff report that include the TEC minutes from the April 15, 2003
meeting, an article from the Ukiah Daily Journal dated April 17, 2003, an a-mail
with a copy of an article addressing the issue from the Los Angeles Times dated
July 6, 2003, and a copy of Resolution 2002-03 of the Mayor's Disability Council
from the City and County of San Francisco, banning the use of Segway on San
Francisco sidewalks. Additional reference materials provided were articles from
the Internet representing the pros and cons on Segway use. Staff noted that
Segway purchase and use is more prevalent in large metropolitan cities than in
smaller communities.
Staff recommended the Committee further discuss the Segway issue and
determine whether to recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance Banning
Segway from City Sidewalks.
Mr. Seanor discussed the potential use of Segway on City sidewalks with City
Engineer Diana Steele, and commented it may be sometime before a Segway is
seen in Ukiah, and if so, they would more than likely be limited in number. It may
be beneficial to provide a demonstration on the operation of a Segway. He
inquired whether the Committee would be amenable to deferring a decision on
the matter until it becomes an issue.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 3:05 p.m.
Jane Kardas, 810 Maple Avenue, Ukiah, Chair of the Advocacy Committee
for the California Council for the Blind, reported she provided testimony at the
April 15 meeting supporting a ban on Segway in this community, noting the use
is potentially hazardous to pedestrians walking on public sidewalks. Sidewalks
would not be the appropriate place for Segway use, especially when sidewalks
are shared by the visually impaired and by persons having other types of
disabilities, since Segway speeds can reach approximately 12 m.p.h.
Betty Green, 1240 N. Pine Street, Ukiah, thanked the Committee for their
concerted efforts in researching and evaluating Segway use on public sidewalks,
even though the matter may be premature.
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 2
Member Mike Harris reiterated that his position on Segway use remains the
same as stated at the April 15 2003 meeting, whereupon he favors the concept
of evaluating and acting on the matter before it becomes an issue. In his opinion,
public sidewalks are not the appropriate place for Segway use, especially when
the City's sidewalks may not wide enough to appropriately accommodate
pedestrians.
Member Dan Walker commented City sidewalks would not be an appropriate
place for Segway use in terms of the speed capacities and the potential for safety
hazards. He briefly commented on the speed capability of a Segway in
conjunction with the potential problems that could occur with use on sidewalks.
Chairman Kageyama referred to an Internet website that provided an excerpt
from the Segway use point of view relative to public safety concerns. In short,
the article demonstrated that Segway use is safer and helps reduce the impacts
caused from the operation of a vehicle, especially in residential areas. The article
noted that the Segway user must exercise good judgment and act responsibly.
The article advised that while the Segway does not have a brake system, it does
feature a system that allows a person to stop the Segway in a safe and controlled
manner.
Jane Kardas commented on the aforementioned article, and stated such factors
as weight and stopping distance would affect the actual ability for a Segway to
stop safely and abruptly.
Member Dan Walker did not support the State legislature's ruling on the use of
Segway that essentially leaves local jurisdictions with the responsibility of having
to decide whether such a mode of transportation should be allowed on its public
sidewalks. He advised that bicycles are required to have a brake system, which
will "lock-up" the wheel and produce a skid of the tire. The California Vehicle
Code governs the use of vehicles, but there is no law governing the use of
Segway on city sidewalks.
It was noted that bicycles are prohibited on sidewalks. State law allows local
jurisdictions to adopt an ordinance to enforce the law; however, law enforcement
officials do not typically cite people, especially younger children, for riding on the
sidewalk unless a person is observed as operating the bicycle recklessly.
Member Dave Lohse supported the concept of allowing Segway use in bicycle
lanes. One favorable aspect for allowing Segway use is that it provides an
alternative means of transportation other than the operation of a vehicle. He
commented that the condition and size of some sidewalks in the community may
not be able to adequately support Segway use or pedestrians.
Member Dan Walker stated it would be illegal to allow Segway users to share
the bicycle lane, as the State ruling provides that Segway use is subject to
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 3
pedestrian regulations, and pedestrians are not permitted to walk in bicycle
lanes.
Member Dave Lohse replied that the solution would essentially be an "outright
ban" on Segway use.
Member Dan Walker stated the primary issue regarding Segway use on
sidewalks is that enforcement of the associated rules and regulations governing
pedestrians lies with the local police departments.
Chairman Kageyama inquired whether a Segway user could be cited for
reckless operation.
Member Dan Walker replied negatively, noting a Segway is not considered a
vehicle that is subject to the rules of the California Vehicle Code, so a police
officer could not cite a person for reckless driving because such users are viewed
as pedestrians according to State law. Conversely, pedestrians are legally not
supposed to walk in the bike lane. There is no code that regulates "reckless
walking." From a law enforcement perspective, reckless operation of a Segway,
where a pedestrian is injured, would be construed as a civil matter and not as a
crime.
A brief discussion followed regarding the issue of whether negligenUreckless
operation of a Segway would be viewed and/or determined by local law
enforcement as misconduct and endangering to pedestrians, noting such
conduct would be difficult to enforce or prosecute. It was noted the State
legislature decision concerning Segway use has made it difficult for local
jurisdictions to make a determination whether to outright ban, limit, or allow the
use. Sidewalks differ in size according to their age and condition.
Michele Leoni, 1250 Boonville Road, Ukiah, commented the State should have
taken better assessments of community sidewalks in terms size and condition
prior to ruling Segway use as pedestrian-oriented.
Member Dave Lohse commented Segway is a visible, stand-up operation and,
in his opinion, should share use with bicycles in the bike lanes. The public safety
issue is of primary concern at this point. He would be inclined to favor allowing
the use in cases where someone had a special need.
Member Jim Looney commented lobbyists representing influential corporations
were more than likely responsible for getting the State to pass the bill allowing
Segway use on sidewalks. The Ukiah City Council would be responsible for
making the final determination whether the use would be allowed or banned in
this community.
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 4
A brief discussion followed regarding the potential problem associated with
deferring the matter, and allowing time for a retail establishment to open a store
for Segway sales. The better approach may be to focus on the matter and make
a recommendation to the City Council before it becomes an issue. On the other
hand, it may be too premature to formulate an ordinance before the matter even
exists. It may be an acceptable time to recommend a ban on Segway use,
allowing for a clause that would permit the matter to be revisited when more
information or evidence is available as to whether Segway use is known to be
problematic.
There was a general discussion concerning skateboards and electric and/or
battery-powered vehicle use, the related problems, and measures taken to
restricUcontrol the uses.
Chairman Kageyama stated he did not see the potential Segway use as being a
problem for this community, noting it may be premature to make a decision. The
Internet articles demonstrated that the use has not been a problem for other
jurisdictions.
Member Jim Looney recommended banning Segway use on sidewalks with the
exception of obtaining a special permit or ADA plaque.
Member Dan Walker viewed the matter as being potentially problematic in terms
of law enforcement compliance.
Member Mike Harris stated the information available on Segway use may not be
applicable to Ukiah, as sidewalks dimensions and conditions vary in
communities. The articles favoring the use do not specifically state that Segway
users were actually operating on sidewalks. He did not feel allowing Segway
users to operate on City sidewalks was appropriate in terms of safety and
potential endangerment and/or injuries to pedestrians, including the Segway
user.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 3:24 p.m.
ON A MOTION by Member Harris, seconded by Member Walker, it was carried
by the following roll call vote of the members present to recommend to the Ukiah
City Council that the Segway should be banned from use on City sidewalks.
Staff will request direction from the City Council as to whether an ordinance
banning the use of Segways on sidewalks should be prepared and returned to
Council for introduction and adoption.
AYES: Members Harris, Lohse, Looney, Seanor, and Walker
NOES: Member Pilant and Chairman Kageyama
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 5
It was noted that the above-referenced recommendation would be presented to
the City Council on November 5, 2003.
b. Discussion and possible action regarding changes to curbside
parking at 605 North State Street -Michelle Leoni, Mountanos
Properties.
Member Rick Seanor reported at the June 17, 2003 meeting, staff presented a
request from Michelle Leoni, Mountanos Properties, 605 North State Street to
consider restricting parking along the property frontage. Ms. Leoni recommended
that a section of red curb be extended south from the business driveway
approximately eight feet. Additionally, she requested the remaining curbside
parking accommodations along the North State Street frontage of Mountanos
Properties be designated 24 minute parking by green curb painting and signage.
She cited problems associated with large trucks often parking along this curb
frontage, creating a site visibility problem for drivers leaving the Mountanos
Properties parking lot. Public Works Superintendent Jim Looney informed the
TEG that he would paint the standard length red curb at the transitions from the
sidewalk to the driveway servicing Mountanos Properties. TEC directed staff to
contact Larry DeKnoblough relevant to enforcement of time-limited parking at the
subject location. Mr. DeKnoblough indicated that enforcement at this location
would be unlikely. According to Parking Enforcement Officer Dot Gialdini, the
subject location is outside the boundary of the parking district jurisdiction and that
regular enforcement would be unlikely because of the requirements for enforcing
parking restrictions within the parking district.
Member Rick Seanor suggested the TEC review and consider the
aforementioned issues, stating staff recommends against establishing a 24-
minute parking zone at this location, since parking enforcement would not occur
on a regular basis. The existing posted signs allow for parking between the
hours of 8 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for a maximum of two-hours. A vehicle is allowed to
park in this zone with no restrictions between the hours of 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.
Michelle Leoni stated the parking problems did not exist when Mountanos
Properties originally purchased the property. She stated parking problems pertain
mainly to large trucks frequently parking at the posted two-hour parking zone,
creating a visibility problem for persons exiting the parking lot. She stated there
are times when the trucks park for longer than the posted parking two-hour limit,
noting it was her understanding that the area is located outside the boundary of
the parking district and parking enforcement would not occur on a regular basis.
She noted the implementation of a 24-minute parking zone may be beneficial by
acting as a deterrent as opposed to trying to enforce the current two-hour parking
restriction in the 8 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. parking zone.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 3:44 p.m.
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 6
Member Dave Lohse inquired regarding the reason for trucks being parked
regularly in this area.
Ms. Leoni responded there could be a variety of reasons for the length of time
the large trucks are parking in the area.
It was noted that two businesses share the street frontage for parking at the
subject location.
Ms. Leoni advised that the adjacent business does not have a parking lot, so
customers and delivery trucks utilize the State Street frontage for parking.
Member Jim Looney stated it was possible to allow for two spaces, one of
which would be for limited parking. Trucks would be unable to park in these
spaces.
It was noted another approach would be to extend the red curb to the south and
still have room for two parking spaces.
Member Jim Looney acknowledged the above-referenced proposal and stated it
was possible to extend the red curb from the Mountanos driveway entrance to
the south, allowing for two, 24-foot parking spaces for regular size vehicles. He
stated one of the parking spaces could be painted green indicating a 24-minute
parking zone, which would prevent trucks from parking in these spaces.
Ms. Leoni inquired whether there was a height limitation restriction for vehicles
parking on City streets.
Member Dan Walker stated an Ordinance was adopted by the City Council that
addresses height restrictions for vehicles. He indicated that enforcement of the
height limitation may resolve the problem of trucks parking in the area.
A discussion followed regarding whether a sign could be posted in this regard.
There was also discussion concerning the problems associated with enforcement
of the 24-minute parking zone for this area.
Ms. Leoni did not favor the concept of having to contact law enforcement for
parking violators.
Chairman Kageyama inquired whether the trucks would be less of a problem if
the red curb were extended on the south side of the driveway.
Ms. Leoni replied extending the red curb may make a difference, noting,
however, the subject area presents a problem due to large trucks parking along
their frontage. An extended red curb would provide better sight distance for
drivers departing the Mountanos parking lot. She supported the concept of
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 7
providing for an extended red zone. A 24-minute parking zone would be
beneficial. She did not favor requesting City law enforcement to specifically
monitor this area for parking violations.
Chairman Kageyama inquired whether the public may be unaware of the two
hour time limit restrictions along the State Street frontage in the subject area.
A brief discussion followed regarding whether the parking signs were posted in
appropriate areas, allowing them to be evident to the public. It was noted that
passing motorists may not be paying close attention to the posted signs
concerning parking restrictions.
Member Jim Looney stated the height ordinance is relatively new so the public
may be unaware of the regulation. On the other hand, when a person sees a
painted green curb, it becomes obvious that there is a parking time limit.
Member Dan Walker supported the concept of extending the red curb to the
south and providing for two parking spaces, one of which would allow for 24-
minute parking. He stated the matter could be revisited if it were not workable.
Ms. Leoni was amenable to the above-referenced proposal.
Member Jim Looney proposed painting the red curb from the driveway entrance
south to a distance that would allow for two parking spaces, making the northern-
most space at the Mountanos business a green curb. The remaining parking
space would be left open. He stated it would be difficult for a truck to fit into a 24-
foot space.
Member Mike Harris inquired whether a truck is allowed to go across two
marked parking spaces.
Member Jim Looney replied it was his understanding that a truck could not
cross over another parking space, especially if the space were a 24-minute
parking zone.
Member Mike Harris inquired whether a truck is allowed to go across two 24-
foot regular parking spaces.
It was noted that a truck is legally allowed to occupy two regularly marked
parking spaces. Additionally, a truck is legally allowed to occupy one regularly
marked parking space and one parking space painted green at the curb,
provided the truck is parked no longer than 24-minutes. There will be no on
street parking space markers (T's) implemented for this matter.
It was noted the above-referenced proposal can later be reviewed should it not
be a workable solution.
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 8
Member Jim Looney stated the height problem would be difficult to address
and/or resolve.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 4:13 p.m.
ON A MOTION by Member Jim Looney, seconded by Member Lohse, it was
carried by an all AYE voice vote of the members present to recommend to the
Ukiah City Council to extend the red curb from the driveway 18 feet south, to
provide two 24-foot parking spaces with the northern space being marked green
indicating a 24-minute parking zone with the remaining space left unmarked
along the frontage of 605 South State Street, as outlined in the staff report, and
as discussed above.
V. NEW BUSINESS
a. Discussion and possible action regarding request from MTA to
establish new bus stops on Gobbi Street at South Oak Street.
Member Doug Pilant reported in June 2003, MTA proposed to the TEC
requesting approval to locate bus stops at the intersection of Gobbi Street and
Oak Street. One of the bus stops was proposed to be located to the west of the
Gobbi Street and Oak Street intersection. The property owner on the corner of
this intersection was contacted and it became very clear that the proposed bus
stop at this location was not a viable solution. MTA discussed alternative
solutions by proposing two bus stops located to the east of the Gobbi Street and
Oak Street intersection. There are currently no designated bus stops on Gobbi
Street between State and Dora Streets. MTA Transit Vehicle Operators have
indicated that there is a large demand for passengers to board and deboard
transit vehicles along Gobbi Street. It has been determined that most of the
passengers either live in the area or desire to shop at Rite Aid or other local
businesses. He referred to Attachment A in the staff report that maps MTA's
proposal for the establishment of two bus stops at the intersection of Oak and
Gobbi Streets. Stop No. 1 would be 50 feet west of the Rite Aide parking lot
entrance and Stop No. 2 would be 50 feet east of the Gobbi and Oak Street
intersection. The proposed locations will utilize curbs that are already designated
as "no parking zones." The proposed locations will also ensure that residents
living in the area and the other bus riders would have a safe and convenient
access to the MTA transit vehicles.
Member Doug Pilant indicated the smaller transit buses would be utilizing the
stops that would be in compliance with the 50-foot recommendation by the TEC,
noting the smaller buses only need 40 feet. The MTA drivers prefer to have at
least 50 feet to easily be able to pull back into traffic.
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 9
It was noted the rear end of the bus would be a few feet past the driveway for
Stop No. 1. One benefit to this location is the stop is located on the far side of
the driveway, which is considered a safety factor.
A brief discussion followed regarding Stop No. 2, addressing whether there were
potential problems in terms of safety and other associated factors with the
proposed location.
Member Jim Looney inquired whether it would be more appropriate if the bus
stops were located farther away from the Gobbi and Oak Streets intersection or
the driveway entrance to Rite Aid.
Member Doug Pilant replied changing the location would not be necessary, as
the proposed locations are designated as "no parking zones."
Member Mike Harris inquired whether there was sufficient room for passing
vehicles to go around a bus after it has stopped to pick up passengers at the two
locations.
It was noted there would be sufficient room for passing vehicles to go around the
buses at the two locations.
ON A MOTION by Member Mike Harris, seconded by Member Rick Seanor, it
was carried by an all AYE voice vote of the members present to authorize the
establishment of two new bus stops on the north and south sides of Gobbi Street
between Oak and State Streets as specifically depicted on Attachment A of the
staff report, and as approved through infield observation by the City Public Works
Superintendent.
VI. COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS
There was no discussion concerning this agenda item.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
a. Review of automated speed limit display signs
b. Review of flexible crosswalk signs
Member Rick Seanor presented brochures of the aforementioned signs to the
Committee. A brief discussion followed regarding the benefits, as well as the cost
of implementing the various types of signs. He encouraged the Committee to
review the information and welcomed comments and/or questions from the
members.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:39 p.m.
Traffic Engineering Committee September 16, 2003
Page 10
Ben K yam hairman
Traffic Engineering Committee
Page 11
i~
° r,G ~ ~~l ~~ ; ~-
Cathy. lawadly, R~ cording Secretary
September 16, 2003