HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-08-18 PacketUkiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Agenda Summary
Page 1 of 1
Item No.:3.a
Date:11/8/18
To:Board of Directors
Subject:Approval of Minutes from the September 13, 2018,Regular Meeting
Consent Agenda Regular Agenda Noticed Public Hearing
Summary:
Approval of Minutes from September 13, 2018,Regular Meeting
Recommended Action:
Approve the September 13, 2018, regular meeting minutes.
Background:
The Agency convened on September 13, 2018.
Fiscal Summary:
N/A
Action: ___________________________________________________
Motion:_____________________ 2nd:__________________________
UKIAH VALLEY BASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY
501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1010 Ukiah California 95482 (707)463-4441 fax (707)463-7237
1:30 P.M. – September 13, 2018
Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Chambers,
501 Low Gap Road, Room 1070, CA 95482
ACTION MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL (1:34 P.M)
Present: Director Levi Paulin; Director Alfred White; Director Jerry Cardoza; and Chair Carre
Brown. Chair Brown presiding.
Absent: Director Brandi Brown, and Vice-Chair Douglas Crane.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by: Mr. Don Seamore.
3. CONSENT ITEMS
3(a) Approval of Minutes from the July 12, 2018, Meeting
Presenter/s: Chair Carre Brown.
Public Comment: None.
Board Action: Upon motion by Director Alfred White, seconded by Director Jerry Cardoza, and
carried (4/0/2, with Director Brandi Brown and Vice-Chair Douglas Crane absent); IT IS
ORDERED that the minutes from the July 12, 2018, Ukiah Valley Groundwater Sustainability
Agency are hereby approved.
4. STAFF UPDATES
Presenter/s: Ms. Sarah Dukett, Senior Administrative Analyst, Mendocino County.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Presenter/s: None.
UKIAH VALLEY BASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY
501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1010 Ukiah California 95482 (707)463-4441 fax (707)463-7237
6. ACTION ITEMS
6(a) Presentation, Discussion and Possible Action Regarding the Development of
the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan
Presenter/s: Ms. Laura Foglia, PhD, Project Manager, Larry Walker and Associates; Mr. Tom
Grovhoug, Strategic Advisor, Larry Walker and Associates; Mr. Chris Petersen, Senior
Hydrogeologist, Larry Walker and Associates; Mr. Sam Sandovol Solis, PhD, Strategic
Advisor/Task Lead, Larry Walker and Associates; Ms. Samira Ismili, Assistant Task Lead, Larry
Walker and Associates; Mr. Amir Mani, PhD, Assistant Project Manager, Larry Walker and
Associates; Mr. Aaron Cuthbertson, Engineering Geologist, California Department of Water
Resources; and Ms. Sarah Dukett, Senior Administrative Analyst, Mendocino County.
Public Comment: Ms. Devon Jones and Ms. Susan Knopf.
Board Direction: GENERAL CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD staff shall place the Technical
Advisory Committee packets on the Mendocino County website several weeks in advance of the
Technical Advisory Committee meeting, and shall also submit an application for Technical
Support Services to the Department of Water Resources for funding to support monitoring
activities in the basin.
6(b) Discussion and Possible Action Related to the Appointment of Members to the
Technical Advisory Committee Representing Russian River Flood Control and
Upper Russian River Water Agency
Presenter/s: Ms. Sarah Dukett, Senior Administrative Analyst, Mendocino County.
Public Comment: None.
Board Action: Upon motion by Director Alfred White, seconded by Director Levi Paulin, and
carried (4/0/2, with Director Brandi Brown and Vice-Chair Douglas Crane absent); IT IS
ORDERED that Mr. Ken Todd shall be appointed to the Russian River Flood Control; Mr. Tyler
Rodrigue shall be appointed to the Upper Russian River Water Agency; and Ms. Tamara Alaniz
shall be appointed as Alternate Member to represent both the Russian River Flood Control and
the Upper Russian River Water Agency.
7. DIRECTOR REPORTS
Presenter/s: None.
Public Comment: None.
8. ADJOURNMENT (3:10 P.M.)
________________________________
CARRE BROWN, Chair
Attest: BRANDI BROWN
Secretary
________________________________
Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Agenda Summary
Page 1 of 2
Item No.:6.a
Date:9/13/18
To:Board of Directors
Subject:Presentation, Discussion and Possible Action Regarding the Development of
Components of the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan
Consent Agenda Regular Agenda Noticed Public Hearing
Summary:
The Board will receive an update and presentation from Larry Walker and Associates regarding
components of the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan including: a draft
communication plan, draft database management plan and the first assessment of data gaps.
Recommended Action:
Accept presentation and provide direction to staff regarding the development of the Ukiah
Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan.
Background:
On June 14, 2018, the Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (UVBGSA)
recommended approval of a contract with Larry Walker and Associates for the development of
the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP). On July 10, 2018, the Mendocino
County Water Agency Board of Directors approved the contract with Larry Walker and
Associates. On September 13, 2018, Larry Walker and Associates present an overview of the
project and schedule to solicit feedback from the Board. Larry Walker and Associates will be
presenting the Board on a regular basis to review components of the GSP for feedback and
approval.
Fiscal Summary:N/A
Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Agenda Summary
Page 2 of 2
Action: ___________________________________________________
Motion:_____________________ 2nd:__________________________
O C T O B E R 2 0 1 8
U k i a h V a l l e y B a s i n G r o u n d w a t e r S u s t a i n a b i l i t y
A g e n c y
Draft- Communication and
Engagement Plan
Prepared by:
LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES
GEI CONSULTANTS
SCI CONSULTING GROUP
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
Project Organization .................................................................................................................... 2
Consultant Team ......................................................................................................................... 2
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) ...................................................................................... 2
Department of Water REsources (DWR) Point of Contact ........................................................ 3
Goals and Desired Outcomes ....................................................................................................... 5
UVBGSA and UVB GSP ........................................................................................................... 5
UVBGSA Decision-Making Process .......................................................................................... 8
Communication objectives to support the GSP .......................................................................... 8
Overriding concerns, major concerns or challenges ................................................................... 9
Stakeholders Involved in the Project .......................................................................................... 9
Methods for Promoting Active Stakeholder Involvement ........................................................ 12
Use of Public Input and Response ............................................................................................ 12
Communications Strategy .......................................................................................................... 13
Internal Communication ........................................................................................................... 13
External Communication .......................................................................................................... 13
Public Meetings .................................................................................................................... 14
Stakeholder Survey and Mapping ......................................................................................... 15
Venues for Engaging............................................................................................................. 15
C&E Implementation Timeline................................................................................................. 15
Evaluation and Assessment ........................................................................................................ 16
Appendix A. GSP Development Schedule .................................................................................. 1
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Table of Figures
Figure 1. POCs at the North Central Region Office to support UVBGSP ..................................... 4
Figure 2. UVBGSA JPA members and their respective boundaries. ............................................. 7
Figure 3. General review process of deliverables. .......................................................................... 8
Figure 4. C&E implementation timeline. ...................................................................................... 16
Appendices
Appendix A. GSP Development Schedule .................................................................................... 1
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 1
Introduction
This Project Communication Plan (CommPlan) is developed to promote the efficient and
effective coordination of internal/external communications and stakeholder engagement in the
Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (UVBGSA) effort to develop a
Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP). The CommPlan will serve as the primary guideline for
addressing the requirements outlined in Department of Water Resources (DWR) Groundwater
Sustainability Plans (GSP) Regulations Section § 354.10:
“Each Plan shall include a summary of information relating to notification and communication
by the Agency with other agencies and interested parties including the following:
(a) A description of the beneficial uses and users of groundwater in the basin, including the land
uses and property interests potentially affected by the use of groundwater in the basin, the types
of parties representing those interests, and the nature of consultation with those parties.
(b) A list of public meetings at which the Plan was discussed or considered by the Agency.
(c) Comments regarding the Plan received by the Agency and a summary of any responses by the
Agency.
(d) A communication section of the Plan that includes the following:
(1) An explanation of the Agency’s decision-making process.
(2) Identification of opportunities for public engagement and a discussion of how public
input and response will be used.
(3) A description of how the Agency encourages the active involvement of diverse social,
cultural, and economic elements of the population within the basin.
(4) The method the Agency shall follow to inform the public about progress implementing
the Plan, including the status of projects and actions.”
The CommPlan serves as the communication and engagement plan for the Ukiah Valley Basin
(UVB) GSP and is developed in response to the following requirement of the DWR evaluation
criterion in GSP Regulations Section § 355.4.b.(4):
“Whether the interests of the beneficial uses and users of groundwater in the basin, and the land
uses and property interests potentially affected by the use of groundwater in the basin, have been
considered.”
The CommPlan will be updated as needed throughout the project term. This will ensure th at up-
to-date information related to project communication is contained in the CommPlan. The
CommPlan will be accompanied by a web-based Communication and Engagement (C&E) tool to
streamline its implementation. The C&E Tool will contain a communication tracking system to
document outreach and engagement activities, compile mailing lists, and summarize
communications with stakeholders. It will be used in the implementation of the CommPlan and
evaluation and assessment of its effectiveness.
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 2
Project Organization
The Ukiah Valley Basin GSP is being developed for the Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater
Sustainability Agency (UVBGSA). Larry Walker Associates, Inc. in collaboration with GEI
Consultants, University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE), and SCI Consulting Group
(LWA Team) are responsible for the development of the GSP at the direction of the UVBGSA.
The UVBGSA Board of Directors (the Board) is shown in Table 1. The Board acts as the GSP’s
overall Project Management Team (PMT) and is scheduled to meet on the second Thursday of
every other month at 1:30 PM in the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Chambers. All
meetings are open to the public with notices, agendas, and minutes posted on Mendocino
County’s (County) website1.
Public engagement is encouraged at the Board’s meetings and an e-Notification2 capability will
be offered by the County to reinforce this purpose for interested parties. Draft deliverables, draft
GSP chapters and other important development milestones are scheduled to be discussed at the
scheduled Board meetings in order to promote transparency regarding the decision-making
process.
Table 1. UVBGSA Board of Directors.
Member Agency Director Alternate Director
County of Mendocino Carre Brown (Chair)
City of Ukiah Douglas F. Crane (Vice Chair)
Russian River Flood Control Alfred White
Upper Russian River Water Agency Jerry Cardoza
Tribal Seat Brandi Brown Sonny Elliott
Agricultural Seat Zachary Robinson Levi Paulin
CONSULTANT TEAM
As mentioned above, the consultant team is led by Larry Walker Associates, Inc. in collaboration
with GEI Consultants, UCCE, and SCI Consulting Group. Dr. Laura Foglia, LWA Project
Manager (PM), will serve as the primary point of contact for the LWA Team, providing clear,
consistent, and effective communication with the PMT and the County.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
UVBGSA has convened a TAC to provide input and recommendations on the technical aspects
of the GSP development process. TAC members and the represented agencies are shown in
Table 2. TAC meetings are scheduled at a similar frequency to the Board’s meetings, on the
second Thursday of every other the month, at 9:30 AM. All meetings are open to the public with
1 https://www.mendocinocounty.org/government/affiliated-agencies/ukiah-valley-basin-gsa
2 https://www.mendocinocounty.org/community/enotification
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 3
notices, agendas, and minutes posted on Mendocino County’s (County) website1. Subscribers to
the e-notification system will be notified automatically for the TAC meetings.
Table 2. UVB TAC members.
Member Agency Member
County of Mendocino Glenn McGourty
City of Ukiah Sean White
Upper Russian River Water Agency Ken Todd
Russian River Flood Control Tyler Rodrigue
Tribal Representative Sonny Elliot, Jr.
Agricultural Representative Levi Paulin
Sonoma County Water Agency Don Seymour
Mendocino County Resource Conservation District Mike Webster
California Land Stewardship Institute Laurel Marcus
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES (DWR) POINT OF CONTACT
All high and medium priority groundwater basins in California are assigned a Point of Contact
(POC) from the DWR Region Offices. POCs assist GSAs and stakeholders in the basin to
connect with the statewide Sustainable Groundwater Management Program and to locate
resources for assistance. POC information for the Regional Office corresponding to the UVB
GSP is shown in Figure 1. Mr. Aaron Cuthbertson from the Division of Integrated Regional
Water Management of the DWR North Central Region Office is the POC for this GSP and can
be reached via email at: Aaron.Cuthbertson@water.ca.gov
1 https://www.mendocinocounty.org/government/affiliated-agencies/ukiah-valley-basin-gsa/technical-advisory-
committee/tac-agenda-and-materials
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 4
Figure 1. POCs at the North Central Region Office to support UVBGSP
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 5
Goals and Desired Outcomes
In August 2014, the California Legislature passed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
(SGMA), which went into effect January 1, 2015. SGMA, a package of three bills (AB 1739
Dickinson, SB 1168 Pavley, and SB 1319 Pavley), requires the long-term and sustainable
management of groundwater resources and places this responsibility on local authorities.
Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) were required to be formed by June 30, 2017 as
the responsible authorities for developing GSPs and achieving SGMA’s implementation goals
and mandates.
The key objective of the Ukiah Valley Basin GSP will be to address groundwater sustainability
by designing strategies that avoid and prevent undesirable results to regional groundwater
resources over the next 20 years, and beyond. Because SGMA requires local stakeholders and
beneficial users to be part of the GSP planning and implementation process, the UVBGSA will
identify and engage stakeholders to integrate their input into the decision-making, coordination,
and management processes. Specific processes are not outlined for the consideration of these
interests in the legislation and it is upon the UVBGSA to define such processes. However,
SGMA specifically requires public meetings to be held during the GSP development and
implementation when:
• When the GSA intends to adopt or amend a GSP (CA Water Code Section § 10728.4);
• Prior the GSA imposing or increasing a fee (CA Water Code Section § 10730.(b)(1))
In order to meet these requirements, UVBGSA is implementing an adaptive management
strategy as explained in detail in the sections below. This strategy contains three phases: (1)
planning, (2) implementation, and (3) evaluation/response, and is intended to work
fundamentally as described in the Community Water Center whitepaper4 on this topic. For the
planning phase, this CommPlan will serve as the document for communication and engagement
in the GSP development and will be updated as necessary. For the implementation phase, the
methods and strategies to be used are described in the Communications Strategy Section.
Finally, for the third phase, the Evaluation and Assessment Section identifies questions to
assess the effectiveness of the C&E plan and to deliver effective and comprehensive responses.
UVBGSA AND UVB GSP
In May 2017, UVBGSA was created to by a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to serve as the
official GSA for the UVB to comply with SGMA. Under the agreement, the UVBGSA shall take
actions deemed necessary to ensure sustainable management of the UVB, as required by
SGMA5.
The UVBGSA consists of a variety of local public agencies with water supply, water
management and land use responsibilities. These include the County of Mendocino, the City of
4 Dobbin, K., Clary, J., Firestone, L., Christian -Smit, J. (2015), “Collaborating for Success: Stakeholder Engagement
for Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Implementation.” Prepared by community water center.
5 Resolution of the election of the UVBGSA can be found here:
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/portal/service/gsadocument/download/3980
JPA forming the UVBGSA can be found here:
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/portal/service/gsadocument/download/4159
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 6
Ukiah, the Upper Russian River Water Agency, and the Russian River Flood Control and Water
Conservation and Improvement District. The boundaries of these agencies are shown in Figure
2. The County of Mendocino exercises land use authority on the land overlying the basin. The
City of Ukiah is a local municipality that exercises water supply, water management and land use
authority within the City’s boundaries. The Upper Russian River Water Agency is a JPA
representing Millview County Water District, Willow County Water District, Calpella County
Water District, and Redwood Valley Water District. The County Water Districts have water
supply and water management responsibilities within the UVB. The Russian River Flood Control
and Water Conservation and Improvement District is a special district created by State statute
(State of California Statute, Act 4830). The District exercises water supply and water
management authority within the UVB.
The UVBGSA Board also includes a tribal representative and an agricultural representative, as
noted in Table 1. Representation by these stakeholder groups on the Board of Directors was a
decision made by the members of the JPA.
In accordance with SGMA priorities established by DWR, the UVBGSA must develop and
submit its GSP by January 31, 2022; the plan must include actions to maintain or achieve
sustainability within twenty years of the GSP’s adoption. The information contained in the GSP
will comprehensively characterize the conditions in the UVB, determine strategies for
sustainably managing groundwater resources, satisfy the requirements of SGMA, be consistent
with Emergency Regulations and guidance prepared by DWR, be implementable by stakeholders
of the UVB, and describe monitoring and reporting to DWR. Moreover, in order to reach the best
outcome for the GSA and local stakeholders, and to satisfy SGMA requirements, all beneficial
uses and the interests of beneficial users of groundwater must be considered through the active
involvement of local stakeholders.
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 7
Figure 2. UVBGSA JPA members and their respective boundaries.
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 8
UVBGSA DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
The general voting procedure of the UVBGSA is outlined in the JPA. Each member of the Board
has one vote. Unless otherwise specified, all affirmative decisions of the Board require the
affirmative vote of a simple majority of all the Board’s Directors participating in voting,
provided that, if a Director is disqualified from voting on a matter before the Board because of a
conflict of interest, that Director shall be excluded from the calculation of the total number of
Directors that constitute a majority. The Board of Directors shall strive for consensus of all
members on all items.
With respect to GSP development, the above-mentioned procedure will be used for all subjects
that require Board’s action.
The LWA Team, the Board, and the TAC have come up with a preferred method of
communication with regards to GSP deliverables and additional matters that need the Board’s
approval and/or the TAC’s involvement and direction. As a soft arrangement, meaning the
timeline can be adjusted respective to the task in hand, the LWA Team will provide a month for
the TAC to review a document or elaborate on a subject that is scheduled to be acted upon in the
upcoming meeting. GSA Board will be provided with at least two weeks advance time before an
official review/presentation of a document for approval at a Board meeting. As explained, all
efforts will be made so that discussions and/or presentations are conducted in the TAC and
Board public meetings to facilitate input from stakeholders and interested parties. In addition,
key documents will be available in advance on County’s website or via the C&E Tool,
whichever appropriate, as a working draft document. Comments made by the TAC, the Board, or
by the public will be addressed in a reasonable timeline (if possible up to the next public
meeting) and the final draft of the deliverable will be presented and action taken by the Board in
the next scheduled meeting. This procedure is illustrated in Figure 3.
During all public meetings, time constrained opportunities will be offered for the public to
comment on all public agenda items. In addition, an opportunity for public comment on items
not on the agenda will be provided.
Figure 3. General review process of deliverables.
COMMUNICATION OBJECTIVES TO SUPPORT THE GSP
The UVBGSA will strive to build broad support for key elements of the GSP and will facilitate
the effective engagement of stakeholders and beneficial users of groundwater to achieve the best
outcome for its GSP. The following are the guiding principles of the GSP communication
strategy:
➢ Inform the public with balanced information to assist them in understanding the issues
to be addressed, alternative management measures, opportunities, and/or solutions.
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 9
➢ Consult with the public by obtaining feedback and public comments on analyses and
decisions. UVBGSA will encourage the public to be involved in the decision-making
process since they are affected by the GSP and can influence the outcome.
➢ Involve beneficial users and work with them throughout the process to ensure that their
concerns, aspirations, and their overall input is understood and considered.
➢ Collaborate with stakeholders in the decision-making process including the
development of management alternatives and identification of preferred solutions.
➢ Empower the members of the GSA by fully considering their priorities and sufficiently
implementing them in the GSP.
➢ Inform all engaged on how their input affected the decision.
➢ Ensure process integrity and transparency.
➢ Utilize facilitation and outreach methods that minimize the cost and environmental
impacts of travel.
➢ Leverage available technological platforms to increase collaboration and efficiency.
➢ Maintain appropriate alignment between engagement, content development, and project
management.
Details of the methods and strategies used to accomplish these objectives are laid out in the
following sections.
OVERRIDING CONCERNS, MAJOR CONCERNS OR CHALLENGES
A challenge in developing and implementing the GSP is the time constraint that may limit the
capability to build relationships and underlying trust between all sectors of the public involved
and/or affected by the GSP. UVBGSA made the necessary efforts through several public
meetings, adequate outreach and notices, and involving major beneficial users in its board of
directors during the formation of the GSA. The GSP development process brings about new
challenges that will need broader involvement and trust to be established. Conflicting interests on
the use of the shared resources may arise that can only be resolved through an effective decision-
making process. It is also possible that needs and interests of particular stakeholders may change
throughout the development process, complicating the dynamics of the planning process. The
CommPlan and its thorough implementation will assist the UVBGSA in overcoming these types
of challenges.
In addition, public outreach and stakeholder engagement takes time and resources to be done
well. This can become a significant challenge since both the time and the resources available to
the UVBGSA are limited. However, the Board believes that its planned strategies and venues of
engagement will enable its communication and engagement efforts to be effective. The Board is
confident that a balanced and effective investment in effective communication and engagement
will lead to improved outcomes, optimized resources, broad support, and reduced conflicts,
which subsequently outweighs its respective cost.
Stakeholders Involved in the Project
SGMA (CA Water Code Section § 10723.2) and GSP Regulations Section § 354.10.(a)
collectively require the UVBGSA to consider interests of all beneficial uses and users of
groundwater basin and provide a description of those users and uses, the types of parties
representing those interests, and the nature of consultation with those parties. Table 3
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 10
summarizes the list of stakeholders identified by the UVBGSA. This list will be updated as
necessary.
Table 3. Identified stakeholders and interested parties for the UVB.
Category of Interest Stakeholder Groups Contact Person
UVBGSA Board of Directors
Land Use County of Mendocino Carre Brown
Land Use/Urban Use City of Ukiah Douglas F. Crane
Integrated Water Management Russian River Flood
Control Alfred White
Urban Use Upper Russian River Water
Agency Jerry Cardoza
California Native American tribes Tribal Seat Brandi Brown
Agricultural Use/ Private Users Agricultural Seat Zachary Robinson
UVB TAC Members
Land Use County of Mendocino Glenn McGourty
Land Use/Urban Use City of Ukiah Sean White
Urban Use Upper Russian River Water
Agency Ken Todd
Integrated Water Management Russian River Flood
Control Tyler Rodrigue
Land Use Sonoma County Water
Agency Don Seymour
Urban/ Agricultural Use
Mendocino County
Resource Conservation
District
Mike Webster
General Public/Land Use California Land
Stewardship Institute Laurel Marcus
Land Use County of Mendocino Glenn McGourty
California Native American tribes Tribal Representative Sonny Elliot, Jr.
Agricultural Use/ Private Users Agricultural Representative Levi Paulin
Public Water Systems
Urban Use
Redwood Valley County
Water District
Millview County Water
District
Willow County Water
District
Calpella County Water
District
Private Water Companies
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 11
Category of Interest Stakeholder Groups Contact Person
Urban Use
City of 10,000 Buddhas
Rogina Water Company
Yokayo Water Systems
California Native American Tribes
California Native American tribes
Redwood Valley Rancheria
Tribal Representative on
UVBGSA and the TAC
Coyote Valley Reservation
Pinoleville Pomo Nation
Potter Valley Rancheria
Guidiville Rancheria
Hopland Reservation
Agriculture
Agricultural Use
Mendocino County Farm
Bureau
Mendocino County Wine
Growers Association Agricultural Representative
on UVBGSA and the TAC Pear Growers
Cannabis Cultivation
State Entities
Environmental and Ecosystem UC Davis Cooperative
Extension
State Lands Department of Water
Resources (DWR)
State Lands/Environmental and
Ecosystem
North Coast Regional
Water Quality Control
Board
State Lands/Environmental and
Ecosystem
California Department of
Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
Federal Entities
Federal Lands/Environmental and
Ecosystem/Integrated Water
Management
US Army Corps of
Engineers
Federal Lands/Environmental and
Ecosystem
US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS)
Environmental and Ecosystem NOAA Fisheries
Environmental and Ecosystem Forest Service
UVB Residents
General Public
Public
Disadvantaged
Communities
Citizen Groups
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 12
METHODS FOR PROMOTING ACTIVE STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
As UVBGSA moves towards developing its GSP, it will initially focus on stakeholder
identification and assessment. The LWA Team will conduct stakeholder interviews at the outset
of the planning effort to understand the interests, concerns, opportunities, and resources that exist
in the stakeholder community. During the GSP development process, the Board will evolve its
outreach efforts by identifying additional stakeholders, understanding their interests and
concerns, and providing a transparent and responsive communication venue for their
engagement. This will happen through the following approach:
• Develop and maintain an updated interested parties’ list through UVBGSA stakeholder
identification and outreach, voluntary subscription, and e-notification system.
• Conduct interviews with key stakeholders at the outset of the GSP planning effort.
• Hold regular public meetings of the UVBGSA Board and the TAC, encouraging public
participation through County website and the C&E Tool. Convene a collaborative
decision-making process through public meetings with the goal of building a shared
understanding and reducing conflicts. This will provide an additional venue for interested
parties to get involved in the more technical side of development and implementation of
GSP.
• Provide alternative opportunities for stakeholders or interested parties that face more
barriers to participation such as holding interviews with the LWA Team, translated
materials, evening meetings, etc.
• Use the C&E Tool as the web-based tool to provide increased access to data and
information in a user-friendly form. Provide emails/newsletters to interested parties
updating them on newly developed documents or information and seeking their
participation and/or comments.
Methods outlined above will help UVBGSA conduct the implementation phase of its adaptive
management strategy.
USE OF PUBLIC INPUT AND RESPONSE
The Board’s success in implementing their adaptive management strategy will depend, in part,
on how it responds to public input. Moreover, a recognizable employment of the public input
boosts engagement and increases the trust in the process and plan. The UVBGSA will respond to
constructive public comments and concerns and demonstrate how they shaped the outcome at
hand. Efforts will include:
• Making draft deliverables provided for the TAC or the UVBGSA review available to the
public to materialize a more fruitful public discussion during the public meetings
scheduled for deciding on those deliverables.
• Publishing Board-approved draft final GSP Chapters for public comment with reasonable
commenting periods. If necessary, responses to comments will be published to elaborate
on how they were implemented or considered in revising the documents.
• Continued implementation of the methods for promoting active engagement of the public
with a focus on obtaining comments and responding to concerns.
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 13
Communications Strategy
As explained in the previous sections, UVBGSA will use a multitude of communication methods
to convey information and obtain input from stakeholders. The applicability of each method will
depend on the goal of the intended communication. As a general rule of thumb, the
communication strategy is divided into external and internal communications as explained
below. UVBGSA will implement a comprehensive communication and engagement plan that
meets SGMA requirements and will try to optimize its strategies in external and internal
communications to maximize the end benefits.
INTERNAL COMMUNICATION
Internal communication is defined as any communication between and among the UVBGSA
Board members, Mendocino County, the TAC or other convened committees, and the LWA
Team that is necessary to keep the planning effort moving forward and to execute the scope of
services articulated in the contract with the LWA Team. The Board, County, and the TAC will
convey internal communications among their own members or with each other using their
preferred methods such as emails, phone conversations, etc., consistent with applicable
regulatory requirements. If a meeting is arranged between any combination of the three, notes
will be taken and kept on record by an assigned member of the participants. The LWA Team will
take and keep notes of the meetings with the Board and the TAC. These notes will be made
available following the approval of the Board via the C&E Tool. The LWA Team will provide
monthly progress reports to the Board.
EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION
External communication is defined as any communication of the UVBGSA, the TAC, the LWA
Team, or any other committee with the public (which includes DWR POC). These
communications may occur through emails and newsletters, public meetings, mailed
flyers/brochures/advertisement, handouts, group interviews, and web-based communications
through the C&E Tool.
For all public meetings, including but not limited to regular Board and TAC meetings, agenda
for the meeting is posted online on the County website and subscribers to the e-notification
system are notified. Electronic flyer for the meeting is also included in the newsletter and
interested parties are notified through their preferred contact method. Meeting minutes are
recorded as the normal procedure of the Board and the TAC and will be posted afterwards on
County website. In addition, the LWA Team keeps record of all its communication with external
parties including group interviews. Those records will be available through appropriate
procedures if approved by the Board.
Online and web-based resources including the C&E Tool, County Website, and County Social
Media outlets are regularly updated and utilized for informing the public of the project status,
posting draft GSP Chapters, publishing notices, receiving comments, demonstrating how public
input is being implemented, disclosing results and data, and sharing news and updates.
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 14
Public Meetings
Currently scheduled public meetings are shown in Table 4. This schedule is subject to change as
the GSP development process progresses and the GSP development schedule is updated
(Appendix A). Meetings with the UVBGSA Board and the TAC are multi-purpose venues for
public engagement and outreach. The LWA Team will provide progress reports at the meetings
unless directed otherwise by the Board; presentations for the Board members or the TAC may be
conducted to assist in the decision-making process or to provide for information to the public;
public comments regarding scheduled and non-scheduled items will be received; and, actions
will be taken and decisions will be made with regards to the GSP development and
implementation.
Table 4. UVBGSA important meeting dates for GSP development process.
Date
Subject of Discussion at UVBGSA
Meeting (1:30 PM)
Subject of Discussion at TAC
Meeting (9:30 AM)
13 September 2018 Introduction
Project Schedule
8 November 2018 Data Management Plan Needs
Assessment
Data Gap Analysis
Monitoring Network Analysis
10 January 2019
Communication Plan
Data Management Plan
Data Gap Analysis
Monitoring Network Analysis
Phase 1 Documents Review
9 May 2019 Data Gap Analysis
Monitoring Network Analysis Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model
10 October 2019 Data Management System
Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model Groundwater Model
9 January 2020 Groundwater Model
Sustainable Management Criteria
Measurable Objectives
12 March 2020
Sustainable Management Criteria
Measurable Objectives
Future Baseline Water Budget
Alternatives Evaluation
9 July 2020 Future Baseline Water Budget
Alternative Scenarios
Sustainable Management Criteria
Measurable Objectives
10 September 2020 Final Sustainable Management Criteria
Final Measurable Objectives
12 November 2020 Final GSP Implementation Plan
14 January 2021 Draft GSP
11 March 2021 Final GSP Draft/ GSP Submittal Draft GSP
If determined essential by the Board, additional public meetings may be scheduled to further
distribute the information to the public at specified locations and times. These meetings will be
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 15
appropriately advertised through the County website, emails and newsletters, interested party list
subscribers, and postal mail or flyers.
Stakeholder Survey and Mapping
At the outset of the GSP development effort, the LWA Team will convene meetings with
identified key stakeholders to gather important information using a survey form tailored to the
UVB GSP effort.
The LWA Team will contact representatives for the key stakeholder organizations to learn more
about them, describe the GSP development process, and will invite them to engage in the
process. Prior to these meetings. the LWA Team will develop background information, maps,
and a stakeholder survey form. Follow up communications may be made to answer questions
that come up or to better understand stakeholder interests, issues, and challenges.
After the stakeholder surveys are completed, the LWA team will compile the information
received in a “Lay of the Land” document. This document will summarize information received
from stakeholders regarding initial concerns/issues, interests, challenges, preferred methods of
communication, and desired level of engagement.
Venues for Engaging
To achieve the goals and objectives of the CommPlan, the UVBGSA will utilize multiple
outreach venues as wells as broader communication tools. This will allow stakeholder
engagement at different levels best suited to stakeholder needs. The Board will use these venues
to provide regular feedback and updates and to receive comments. These venues are discussed in
previous sections and are listed below:
- Public meetings of the Board and Advisory Committees: for all interested parties.
Advertised and announced through appropriate means such as email newsletters,
interested parties subscription lists, e-notification system, flyers and banners, etc.
- Stakeholder interviews and/or work group meetings
- Community or regional forums: conducted on as needed basis by the UVBGSA, the
LWA Team, or appropriate public agencies identified by the Board.
- Public workshops/briefings: Conducted if deemed necessary by the Board with the help
of the LWA Team, DWR, and/or other appropriate public agencies for information
sharing and receipt of input.
- Digital venues: County website and the C&E Tool will be used as the main online
resources for conducting and tracking engagement and outreach activities. Emails and
newsletters will be delivered to the interested parties’ list and subscribers. Available
social media outlets will be used as needed.
- Mailing services: provided on as needed basis and may include one or a combination of
informational brochures, advertisement, flyers, handouts, etc.
C&E IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
Implementation of the C&E Plan (CommPlan) will follow the timeline shown in Figure 4. The
implementation timeline is subject to periodic update and change dependent on the status of the
project and the GSP development schedule (Appendix A).
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 16
Figure 4. C&E implementation timeline.
Evaluation and Assessment
At key C&E milestones laid out in the C&E Implementation Timeline Section, the UVBGSA
will evaluate the effectiveness of its responses to the following questions:
• Is there a shared understanding of the GSP’s goals and its implementation timeline?
• Are stakeholders educated about the GSP development process and their own role?
• Has the GSA received positive press coverage?
• Do diverse stakeholders feel included?
• Has there been behavior changes related to the program goals? Or is improved
trust/relationships in evidence among participants?
• Has the CommPlan been implemented and updated?
• Has the interested parties’ list been expanded?
• Have there been well-attended and robust public hearings at all of the necessary
junctures?
• Are all established venues for stakeholders open and effective?
• Are there formal mechanisms to assess outcomes and make improvements?
Reviewing these results will help identify what worked well, what did not work as planned, and
to summarize lessons learned.
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Appendix A. GSP Development Schedule
DRAFT - GSP Communications Plan
Page 1
Draft Outline
Data Management Plan
Ukiah Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Data Management and Groundwater Sustainability Plan
(GSP) Requirements
1.3 Organization
2.0 Data Management During GSP Development
2.1 Data Needs
2.1.1 Types of Data We Need
2.1.2 Our List (See Data Schema)
2.2 Data Compilation of Review
2.2.1 Data Collection Process
2.2.2 Data Review
2.2.3 Data Upload
2.3 Data Management System Selection
2.3.1 Desk Top Application
2.3.2 Web Tool Application
2.4 Schedule
3.0 Data Management During GSP Implementation Period (2020-
2040)
3.1 Annual DMS Update
3.2 Annual Reporting/ 5-Year Updates
3.3 Annual Cost
Overview of Approach to DMS
Chris Petersen
cpetersen@geiconsultants.com
352.6: Each Agency shall develop and maintain a data management system that is capable
of storing and reporting information relevant to the development or implementation of the Plan
and monitoring of the basin
354.40: Monitoring data shall be stored in the data management system developed
pursuant to Section 352.6. A copy of the monitoring data shall be included in the Annual
Report and submitted electronically on forms provided by the Department.
Well information used to develop the basin setting shall be maintained in the Agency’s
data management system.
Draft Outline
Data Management Plan
Ukiah Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Data Management and Groundwater Sustainability Plan
(GSP) Requirements
1.3 Organization
2.0 Data Management During GSP Development
2.1 Data Needs
2.1.1 Types of Data We Need
2.1.2 Our List (See Data Schema)
2.2 Data Compilation of Review
2.2.1 Data Collection Process
2.2.2 Data Review
2.2.3 Data Upload
2.3 Data Management System Selection
2.3.1 Desk Top Application
2.3.2 Web Tool Application
2.4 Schedule
3.0 Data Management During GSP Implementation Period (2020-
2040)
3.1 Annual DMS Update
3.2 Annual Reporting/ 5-Year Updates
3.3 Annual Cost
Final Data
Management
Plan
Feb. 15, 2019
Comments
and
Feedback
Jan. 31,
2019
Draft Data
Management
Plan
Dec. 31,
2018
Prezi Presentation
Data Format
Time
period Number Source Additional Information
Streams Shapefile
Springs Shapefile
Water bodies Shapefile
Streamflow Measurements Shapefile/Table 1991-2015 3 inside
UVB USGS
Precipitation 1 CIMIS
Precipitation 2 CDEC
Land Use Shapefile 2010 1 DWR
Land Use Shapefile 2014 1
SGMA Portal LU
Viewer
Land Use Shapefile 2011 1 NLCD
Land Use Shapefile 2011 1 Mendocino County Vector Shapefile with no metadata: its year is not specified.
Geology Shapefile
Elevation (DEM)Raters Lidar 2017 USGS
Elevation (DEM)NED DEM from Mendocino County with 30m resolution
Wells Shapefile/Table 38 CASGEM Few number of data points
Wells Shapefile/Table 4 DWR
Wells Shapefile/Table ~ 1999 to
~present 433 GeoTracker Varies based on remediation/cleanup site.
Soil Map/CSV 1 DWR/SSURGO
Land Use Local Land Use maps going back to 25 to 30 years ago.
Streamflow Measurements 4 NOAA(NFSM)
Missing timeseries data. Shapefile was not shared but Phase 1
Report has a figure for them.
Streamflow Measurements 3 CLSI
On McNab Creek. Missing respective timeseries data. Shapefile and
location are available.
Geologic Cross Sections Maps 3 LACO Prelim Studies Missing the maps.
Wells
More areal coverage and additional number of wells to be monitored
as part of incorporating them into CASGEM or in the Monitoring
Network of the GSP. Well completion reports and geology logs of
the wells made available for Phase 1 and any additional logs that
could be shared are needed, as well.
River Bed Properties Some information from MODLFOW file and the LACO Water
Budget study made available.
Gathered Data (Phase 1 Data, Public and Online Databases)
Projected Data Needs Not Yet Available
Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan: Preliminary Discussion of Available Data and Data Gaps
MEAS_ACCURACY_LU
MA_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
QM_CODE_LU
QM_Code (PK)
DESCRIPTION
MM_CODE_LU
MM_Code (PK)
DESCRIPTION
WATER_LEVEL
WATER_LEVEL_ID (PK)
WELL_ID
Measurement_Date
Year
Season
NM_Code
QM_Code
Reading_RP
Raeading_WS
RP_Elev
GS_Elev
WSE
GS_to_WS
MM_Code
MA
Collecting_Agency
DATA_SOURCE
Source_Agency
Source_workbook
Source_worksheet
Use_For_Reporting
Use_For_Contouring
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
WELL _INFO
WELL_ID (PK)
SITE_ID
WELL_ID_Name
Well_Name
Well_Alt_Name
Well_State_Number
Well_Type
Well_Use
Well_Status
Is_CASGEM_Well
CASGEM_ME
CASGEM_Well_Type
Is_SGMA_Well
Local_ID
CASGEM_ID
CASGEM_MSC_ID
USGS_ID
GEOTRACKER_GLOBALID
GEOTRACKER_WELLIID
KCWA_ID
PS_CODE
GSA
Agency
Owner
Operator
Purveyor
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
SITE_INFO
SITE_ID (PK)
Site_Name
IS_WELL_SITE
IS_DIVERSION
IS_RECHARGE_SITE
Basin_Subbasin_ID
BASIN_PORTION_ID
County
Coordinate_Y
Coordinate_X
Projection
Coord_Source
Coord_Method
Coord_Accuracy
Accesibility
Data_Source
Address_Street
Address_City
Address_State
Address_Zip
Nearest_Cross_Street
Ground_Surface_Elev
Reference_Point_Elev
REFERENCE_POINT_DESC
Elev_Source
Elev_Method
Elev_Accuracy
Mgmt_Area
PLSS_Township
PLSS_Range
PLSS_Section
PLSS_QQ_Section
PLSS_Meridian
Quad_Name
Quad_Number
Location_Description
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
LatitudeA
LongitudeA
DATASET
SEASONS_LU
Seasons_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
WATER_QUALITY
CHEMICAL_RESULT_ID (PK)
sample_id
SITE_ID
WELL_ID
Measurement_Date
Measurement_Time
Year
Season
Sample_Location
CHEMICAL_TYPE_KEY
Less_Greater_Than
Measurement_Value
Measurement_Unit
EPA_DHS_Method_Number
Detection_Limit_for_Reporting
Detection_Limit_Comments
Negative_QC
Non_Detect
Maximum_Contaminant_Level
Maximum_Contaminant_Level_type
Reporting_Lab
Sample_ID_Lab
Chemical_Group
Use_for_GSP
Source_Agency
Source_workbook
Source_worksheet
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
Data_Source
CHEMICAL_TYPE_LU
CHEMICAL_TYPE_KEY(PK)
CAS_Number
Unit
Frequency
MEASUREMENT_UNIT_LU
Measurement_Unit_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
WELL_PUMPING
WELL_PUMPING_ID (PK)
WELL_ID
PURVEYOR_ID
Measurement_Type
Month_Or_Annual
Year
Annual_Volume
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
AGENCIES
AGENCY_ID (PK)
NAME
CONTACT
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PHONE
EMAIL
URL
IS_GSA
IS_CASGEM_ME
IS_Driller
IS_PERMITTING_AGENCY
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
WELL_TYPE_LU
Well_Type_KEY
DESCRIPTION
WELL_USE_LU
Well_Use_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
WELL_STATUS_LU
Well_Status_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
WELL_GEOLOGIC_LITHOLOGY
LITH_ID (PK)
WELL_ID
Geologist
LITH_ZONE_TOP
LITH_ZONE_BOTTOM
Lith_Classcode
Lith_Description
Lith_Additional_Info
Percent_Coarse
Lith_Source
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
WELL_GEOLOGIC_AQUIFER
AQUIFER_ID (PK)
WELL_ID
Geologist
Date_Last_Redeveloped
Principal_Aquifer
Transmissivity
Hydraulic_Conductivity
Storativity
Porosity
Aquifer_Data_Source
Type_of_Pump_Test
Well_Development_Log
Confinement_Type
Thickness_of_Confining_Layer
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
WELL_CONSTR
WELL_ID (PK)
Well_Completion_Type
Well_Completion_Rpt_Num_DWR
Permit_Number
Permit_Agency_ID
Driller_ID
Driller_Report_As_Built
Date_Drilled
Well_Destruction_Date
Total_Well_Casing_Depth
Well_Casing_Open_Bottom
Borehole_Depth
Drill_Method
Well_Casing_Diameter
Well_Casing_Material
WELL_CONSTRUCTION_DATE_SOURCE
Borehole_Diameter
Conductor_Used
Conductor_Removed
Conductor_Depth
Conductor_Casing_Diameter
Well_Integrity
Design_Pumping_rate
Sanitary_Seal_depth
Sanitary_Seal_material
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
WELL_CONSTR_SCREEN
WELL_SCREEN_ID (PK)
WELL_ID
Top
Bottom
Material
Diameter
Slot_Size
Slot_Size_units
Is_Open_Borehole
COMMENTS
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
SCREEN_MATERIAL_LU
Screen_material_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
WELL_COMPLETION_TYPE_LU
WELL_COMPLETION_TYPE_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
DRILL_METHOD_LU
Drill_Method_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
WELL_CASING_MATERIAL_LU
WELL_CASING_MATERIAL_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
SANITARY_SEAL_MATERIAL_LU
SANITARY_SEAL_MATERIAL_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
PRINCIPAL_AQUIFER_LU
PRINCIPAL_AQUIFER_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
CONFINEMENT_TYPE_LU
Confinement_Type_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
LITH_CLASSCODE_LU
Lith_classcode_KEY (PK)
Lith_classname
DESCRIPTION
LITH_SOURCE_LU
QM_Code_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
COUNTIES_LU
COUNTY_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
COORD_METHOD_LU
Coord_Method_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
COORD_ACCURACY_LU
Coord_Accuracy_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
STATES_LU
STATE_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
ELEV_METHOD_LU
Elev_Method_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
ELEV_ACCURACY_LU
Elev_Accuracy_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
PLSS_TOWNSHIPS_LU
PLSS_TOWNSHIPS_KEY (PK)
PLSS_RANGES_LU
PLSS_RANGES (PK)
QQ_SECTIONS_LU
QQ_Sections_KEY (PK)
PLSS_MERIDIANS_LU
PLSS_MERIDIANS_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
SW_RECHARGE
SITE_ID
PURVEYOR_ID
Measurement_Type
Month_Or_Annual
Year
Annual_Volume
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Comments
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
B118_BASINS_2016
Basin_Subbasin_ID (PK)
Basin_ID
Basin_Name
Subbasin_Name
BASIN_SUBBASIN_NAME
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
SW_DIVERSION
SITE_ID
PURVEYOR_ID
Measurement_Type
Month_Or_Annual
Year
Annual_Volume
MEASUREMENT_TYPE_LU
Measurement_Type_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
MONTH_OR_ANNUAL_LU
Month_Or_Annual_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
CASGEM_WELL_TYPE_LU
CASGEM_Well_Type_KEY (PK)
DESCRIPTION
BASIN_PORTION
BASIN_PORION_ID (PK)
PORTION_NAME
CASGEM_ME_KEY
BASIN_SUBBASIN_ID
CREATED_BY
CREATED_DT
UPDATED_BY
UPDATED_DT
DISABLED
Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Agenda Summary
Page 1 of 1
Item No.:6.b
Date:11/8/18
To:Board of Directors
Subject:Discussion and Possible Action Including Adoption of the 2019 Board of Directors
Master Meeting Calendar
Consent Agenda Regular Agenda Noticed Public Hearing
Summary:
The Joint Power Agreement requires that the Board of Directors meet at least quarterly (Section
8.2). Therefore, the Board of Directors should consider the proposed 2019 Board of Directors
Master Meeting Calendar.
Recommended Action:
Adopt the 2019 Board of Directors Master Meeting Calendar.
Background:
On May 10, 2017,the general consensus of the Board was the Board shall meet on the Second
Thursday of the month at 1:30 P.M. in the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors Chambers;
initially meeting monthly, then transitioning to quarterly meetings.
Fiscal Summary:N/A
Action: ___________________________________________________
Motion:_____________________ 2nd:__________________________
UVBGSA MEETING DATES
JANUARY FEBRUARY January 10
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Regular Meeting
1 2 3 4 5 1 2
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 February 14
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Public Hearing
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 March 14
Regular Meeting
MARCH APRIL April 11
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Regular Meeting
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 May 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Regular Meeting
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 June 13
31 Regular Meeting
MAY JUNE July 11
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Regular Meeting
1 2 3 4 1
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 August 8
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Regular Meeting
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 September 12
30 Regular Meeting
JULY AUGUST October 10
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Regular Meeting
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 November 14
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Regular Meeting
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 December 12
Regular Meeting
SEPTEMBER OCTOBER
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Meeting Location
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 501 Low Gap Rd. Room 1070, Ukiah, CA 95482
29 30 27 28 29 30 31
Meeting Time
1:30 p.m.
NOVEMBER DECEMBER
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Ukiah Valley Basin GSA
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 501 Low Gap Road, Room 1010
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ukiah, CA 95482
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31
707.463.4441
uvbgsa@mendocinocounty.org
www.mendocinocounty.org/uvbgsa
2019