HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-10-11 PC PacketPage 1 of 2
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
AGENDA
(to be held both at the physical and virtual locations below)
Civic Center Council Chamber ♦ 300 Seminary Avenue ♦ Ukiah, CA 95482
To participate virtually, go to the following link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/91264543193
To view the meeting (without participating), go to: http://www.cityofukiah.com/meetings/
Or you can call in using your telephone only:
• Toll-free 1-669-444-9171
• Enter the Access Code: 912 6454 3193
• Raise hand: After being recognized, Enter *9
• To Speak after being recognized: enter *6 to unmute yourself
October 11, 2023 - 6:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4.a. Approval of the Minutes of September 27, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting
Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes of September 27, 2023, Planning Commission
Meeting
Attachments:
1. September 27, 2023, PC Minutes
5. APPEAL PROCESS
All determinations of the Planning Commission regarding major discretionary planning permits are final unless a written appeal,
stating the reasons for the appeal, is filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the date the decision was made. An
interested party may appeal only if he or she appeared and stated his or her position during the hearing on the decision from
which the appeal is taken. For items on this agenda, the appeal must be received by October 23, 2023.
6. COMMENTS FROM AUDIENCE ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
The Planning Commission welcomes input from the audience that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Planning
Commission. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than
ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments.
Page 1 of 52
Page 2 of 2
7. SITE VISIT VERIFICATION
8. VERIFICATION OF NOTICE
9. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS REPORT
10. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
10.a. Receive Community Development Director's Report
Recommended Action: Receive Community Development Director's Report.
Attachments:
1. Planning Division Projects Report - 10-1-23
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
13. NEW BUSINESS
13.a. Consideration of an offer of public artwork in Todd Grove Park that would formalize existing
mural components on a public structure and approve a proposal for the remaining portion
consistent with the City’s Public Art Policy
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept the offer of
public artwork, as presented based on the Findings in Attachment 1 and the Conditions of
Approval in Attachment 2.
Attachments:
1. Draft Findings
2. Draft Conditions of Approval
3. Application Materials
13.b. Receive Planning Commissioners Training from City Attorney's Office and Discuss and/or Ask
Questions as Necessary.
Recommended Action: Receive Planning Commissioners training presentation from City
Attorney's Office and discuss and/or ask questions as necessary.
Attachments:
1. AB 1234 Self-Study Outline
2. Brown Act Outline
3. Ethics training forms - sign in sheet certificate
14. ADJOURNMENT
Please be advised that the City needs to be notified 72 hours in advance of a meeting if any specific accommodations or interpreter services
are needed in order for you to attend. The City complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with
disabilities upon request. Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Planning Commission after distribution of the agenda
packet are available at the Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482; and online at: www.cityofukiah/meetings/ at the end of the next
business day.
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at
the main entrance of the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting
set forth on this agenda.
Dated: October 5, 2023
Stephanie Abba, Planning Commission Secretary
Page 2 of 52
Agenda Item 4a
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF UKIAH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
Civic Center Council Chamber ♦ 300 Seminary Avenue ♦ Ukiah, CA 95482
Virtual Meeting Link: https://zoom.us/j/91264543193
September 27, 2023
6:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City of Ukiah Planning Commission held a Regular Meeting on September 27, 2023. The meeting
was legally noticed on September 20, 2023. The meeting was held in person and at the following virtual
link: https://zoom.us/j/91264543193. Chair Mark Hilliker called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
CHAIR M. HILLIKER PRESIDING.
2. ROLL CALL
Roll was taken with the following Commissioners Present: Thao Phi, Alex deGrassi, and Chair Mark
Hilliker. Commissioners Absent: Rick Johnson Staff
Present: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director; Jesse Davis, Chief Planning Manager;
and Stephanie Abba, Planning Commission Secretary.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Approval of the Minutes of September 13, 2023, a Regular Meeting.
Motion/Second: T. Phi/A. de Grassi to approve the Minutes of September 13, 2023, a Regular Meeting
as submitted. Motion carried by the following Roll Call votes: AYES: T. Phi, A. deGrassi, and Chair M.
Hilliker. NOES: None ABSENT: R. Johnson ABSTAIN: None
5. APPEAL PROCESS
Chair Hilliker stated that the appeals deadline date is October 09, 2023. No appeals were received.
6. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
No Comments from Audience
7. SITE VISIT VERIFICATION
Verified by Commissioners
8. VERIFICATION OF NOTICE
Verified by Staff
9. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS REPORTS
Report Received by M. Hilliker
Page 3 of 52
Minutes of the Planning Commission September 27, 2023, Continued:
Page 2 of 2
10. DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Presenter: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
Report received
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
No items on the Consent Calendar
12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
No Unfinished Business Agendized.
13. NEW BUSINESS
a. Modification to a previously approved Major Use Permit to allow for on-site consumption
of Cannabis Products in a designated Cannabis Consumption Area – Outdoor on the
premises of an existing Cannabis-Related Business in accordance with the Ukiah City Code
Section 9174.3(c)(5) at 1076 & 1078 Cunningham Street; APN 003-140-65; File No. 23-8481
Presenter: Jesse Davis, Chief Planning Manager
Motion/Second: A. de Grassi/T. Phi Approve the requested modification to the previously approved
Major use Permit to allow for on-site consumption of Cannabis Products in a designated Cannabis
Consuption Area Outdoor in accordance with Ukiah City Code Section 9174.3(c)(5) at 1076 & 1078
Cunningham Street; APN 003-140-65; File No. 23-8481. Motion carried by the following Roll Call votes:
AYES: T. Phi, A. deGrassi, and Chair M. Hilliker. NOES: None ABSENT: R. Johnson ABSTAIN : None
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:43 p.m.
______________________________________
Stephanie Abba, Planning Commission Secretary
Page 4 of 52
Page 1 of 1
Agenda Item No: 10.a.
MEETING DATE/TIME: 10/11/2023
ITEM NO: 2023-3073
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Receive Community Development Director's Report
DEPARTMENT: Community
Development PREPARED BY: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
PRESENTER: Craig Schlatter, Community Development
Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Division Projects Report - 10-1-23
Summary: Planning Commission will receive the Community Development Director's report.
Background: Director's Reports are bi-monthly oral reports given by the Community Development Director on
the status of projects of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Updates may
include, but are not limited to, application status of major and minor discretionary permits, the implementation
status of advanced planning and related 2040 General Plan programs and projects, and updates related to the
activities of other divisions of the Department.
Discussion: This report is expected to provide updates in the following areas:
• October 2023 Planning Division Projects report (Attachment 1).
o This is a monthly report produced on the first of each month. Updates that have occurred
since the first of the month are provided to the Commission verbally during the report. The
October 2023 report and previous monthly reports are also located on the Planning Division
Services webpage, under "Current Planning Reports":
https://cityofukiah.com/communitydevelopment/planning-services/
Recommended Action: Receive Community Development Director's Report.
Page 5 of 52
Permit # Site AddressDate of Submittal/ Resubmittal Summary of ProjectStatusAssigned Planner22-7956 162 Talmage Rd. 6/28/23Major Site Development Permit for the Splash Express Car Wash #5 (dBA LUV Car Wash) facility. Includes demolition of the existing structures and redevelopment of a new 2,433 sf car wash facility, located within the Heavy Commercial (C2) zoning district.Airport Land Use Commission Referral: 3/23/23 (ALUC Staff - Deemed Consistent) Design Review Board Hearing: 5/25/23 Item Approved by PC on 6/28/23; PC Decision Appealed by Eric Crane on 7/5/23; City Council Appeal Hearing: 10/18/23Craig SchlatterN/A 600 Live Oak Ave.2/27/23; 7/21/23Todd Grove Public Art Mural Permit within the Public Facilities (PF).Design Review Board Meeting: 5/25/23 (DRB recommended to PC with modifications); Planning Commission Hearing: 10/11/23Jesse Davis17-3069 1294 N. State St. 9/13/17;9/14/21; 9/28/22; 5/12/23; 7/11/23Resubmitted Major Use Permit and Site Development Permit to allow for construction of two retail suites (including one drive-through), located in the C-1 (Community Commercial) zoning district.Incomplete 6/2/22; 9/29/22; 5/27/23; Design Review Board Meeting: TBD; Awaiting response from Applicant.Michelle Irace23-8774 1104 S. State St. 8/24/2023 Green Advt 101/Cookies Cannabis Use Permit Annual Renewal Submitted: 8/24/23. Referred out on 8/29/23. ZA Hearing scheduled for 10/11/23Michelle Irace23-8753 104 Echo Way 8/4/2023 104 Echo Way Minor Subdivision ModificationSubmitted: 8/4/23; Referred out on 8/15/23; CE Hearing scheduled for 10/19/23Michelle IraceCity of UkiahSubmitted Planning Applications As of 10/1/2023Page 1 of 3Page 6 of 52
Permit # Site AddressApproval Date Summary of ProjectCommentsAssigned Planner23-8481 1076 Cunningham Rd. 9/27/2023Major Use Permit to include outdoor consumption lounge at the existing Heritage Mendocino cannabis dispensarySubmitted: 7/31/23; Planning Commission Hearing: Approved by PC on 9/27/23Jesse Davis23-8069 218 Mason St.9/13/23Minor Use Permit for conversion of use from commercial to mixed-use within the Community Commercial (C1) zoning district.Approved by the Zoning Administrator on 9/13/23Michelle Irace22-7977 101 S. Main St.; 9/29/23Major Site Development Permit for construction of a new 5,320 sf Redwood Credit Union bank facility, located within the Urban Center (UC) zoning district.Design Review Board Meeting: 3/23/23 Planning Commission Hearing: 5/10/23. Item Denied on 6/14/23 by PC; PC Decision Appealed by Applicant 6/23/23.City Council Appeal Hearing: 7/19/23; Council recommended project modifications; Appeal from applicant approved by City Council at a Special Hearing on 9/29/2023.Michelle IraceA_2021-01 Citywide 9/11/2023 Annexation of City-Owned Parcels.Submitted Annexation Application to LAFCo 2/23/22. Incomplete letter received 3/25/22. Updated application submitted in June 2022.Prezoning and application modifications to Planning Commission 3/22/23 City Council on 4/5/23. Application update submitted to LAFCo on 04/20/23. Application approved by LAFCo on 09/11/2023.Jesse DavisCity of UkiahRecently (Within Previous 90 Days) Approved ProjectsAs of 10/1/2023Page 7 of 52
Permit # Site Address Approved Date Summary of Project Comments Assigned PlannerN/A Citywide N/AOrdinance Amendment for modifications to Objective Design and Development Standards for New Residential Construction (UCC 9055)Proposed amendments reviewed by Design Review Board 7/27/23.Planning Commission Hearing: 9/13/23; First Reading by City Council on 10/4/23; Secrond Reading and Adoption by City Council on 10/18/23.Jesse DavisN/A Citywide N/AOrdinance Amendment for modifications to UCC 3016 for Demolition Permit proceduresWorking with Rincon Consultants, Inc. to update/streamline Demolition Permit procedures. Funded by Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant. Anticipate brining proposed amendments forward Fall, 2023.Michelle Irace N/A Citywide N/A 2040 General Plan Implementation Programs2040 General Plan adopted by City Council 12/7/22. Implementation efforts began January, 2023Michelle Irace,Jesse DavisA_2022-02Unincorporated Western Hills N/AWestern Hills Open Land Acquisition and Limited Development Agreement Project - Annexation Application.Annexation application submitted to LAFCo: 6/8/22. Incomplete letter from LAFCo received 6/29/22.Prezoning and application modifications to PC/CC anticipated Fall, 2023Michelle Irace,Jesse DavisN/A Citywide N/AOrdinance Amendment for modifications to Lot Line Adjustment Requiremetns. Proposed amendments to CC in Winter, 2023. Craig SchlatterCity of UkiahAdvanced Planning ProjectsAs of 10/1/2023Page 8 of 52
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13a
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
300 Seminary Ave.
Ukiah, CA 95482
Staff Report
Todd Grove Park Mural – Offer of Public Artwork
Todd Grove Park (APN 001-090-02)
1
DATE: October 4, 2023
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jesse Davis, Chief Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of an offer of public artwork in Todd Grove Park that would formalize
existing mural components on a public structure and approve a proposal for the remaining portion
consistent with the City’s Public Art Policy.
SUMMARY
OWNER(S): City of Ukiah
APPLICANT: Ukiah Valley Youth Leadership Coalition/Redwood
Community Services
LOCATION: Todd Grove Park, (APN 001-090-02)
TOTAL ACREAGE: ±7.19 acres (±313,196 sq ft)
GENERAL PLAN: Public (P)
ZONING DISTRICT: Public Facilities (PF)
AIRPORT COMPATABILITY: N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
Categorical Exemption, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15301, Existing Facilities (a)
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions, based on the Findings contained in
Attachment 1, and the Conditions of Approval in Attachment
2.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
In October 2021, an offer of public artwork was received and approved by the City of Ukiah
Department of Community Services. At that time, a ‘Mural Permit’ was not requested, nor was the
work undertaken in compliance with the City’s Public Art Policy. The offer for public artwork was
submitted by the Ukiah Valley Youth Leadership Coalition (UVYLC), a program of the Arbor
Center, sponsored by Redwood Community Services.
The UVYLC identified a lead artist, Josue Rojas, to design a large-scale mural on the theme of
immigration, and then commenced painting on the exterior walls of the park’s restroom near the
Page 9 of 52
Staff Report | Mural Permit
Todd Grove Park Mural – Offer of Public Artwork
Todd Grove Park (APN 001-090-02)
2
playground at Todd Grove Park. While the mural was partially completed, the work was paused,
until such time that a ‘Mural Permit’ could be reviewed and approved.
Beginning in November of 2021, Community Development Staff intermittently consulted with the
UVYLC to find a design that met the City’s Public Art Policy and that was considered acceptable
by various Departments within the City of Ukiah.
On May 25, 2023, as required by the City’s Public Art Policy, the request was reviewed by the
City’s Design Review Board. While the DRB was supportive of the request, they recommended
that the proposed slogan “No human is illegal on stolen land” be relocated to a less prominent
location, or that an alternative slogan be identified.
On September 20, 2023, Redwood Community Services confirmed a final design for the mural
that met the recommendation of the Design Review Board and was found acceptable to the City
of Ukiah. As conveyed in Attachment 3, the banner is now proposed to read “We are all guests
on this earth.”
At present, most of the mural has been completed, as the western, northern, and eastern sides
of the subject structure were finished in 2021. The south side of the subject structure, however,
remains incomplete, and requires review and approval from the Planning Commission before it
can be completed. At this stage, the request is to formalize approval of the existing mural
components and approve the proposal for the remaining portion consistent with the City’s Public
Art Policy. As proposed, the banner will now read “We are all guests on this earth.” Additionally,
the UVYLC intends to add details to finalize the mural, such as hands, facial features, background
striping, minor touch-ups and other items that remain incomplete from 2021. No further changes
are identified for the west, north, and east sides of the public structure.
DISCUSSION
Finalization of this proposal required numerous discussions between Staff and the Applicant, as
it involved the sensitive intersection between public art, community spaces, and artistic
expression. It's important to note that the appropriateness of public art depends highly on
situational context and its suitability for the site. In this instance, the proposed mural is adjacent
to the primary playground area of Todd Grove Park, which is oriented towards children (ages 2-
10). In general, public art near a playground should be designed with the goal of creating a fun,
engaging, and safe environment for children. While murals that celebrate Ukiah’s culture, history,
or diversity could instill a sense of pride and identity among children and their families, more
complicated messages may not be appropriate to that immediate context, as required by the City’s
Public Art Policy. As conveyed by Design Review Board Member Tom Liden during the Design
Review Board hearing on May 25, 2023:
“Public art is really different than art…art is provocative…but when you’re dealing with public
space, you have to approach it differently. There is a separation between art for the artist that is
a private canvas, and art that is being produced for public property for everybody to reflect upon.”
Ideally, public art should reflect the interests and needs of the local community while promoting
dialogue, as exemplified by public art installations, like the Mayor’s Monarch Mural located in Alex
Thoms Plaza. That request sought to raise awareness and encourage preservation of the
monarch butterfly and was undertaken with efforts to increase native gardens and local
pollinators.
Furthermore, for art on public property, community input and consultation with relevant
stakeholders needs to be prioritized. The dialogue should seek to ensure that the proposed public
art aligns with the values and goals of nearby residents, as well as visitors to the park. The original
Page 10 of 52
Staff Report | Mural Permit
Todd Grove Park Mural – Offer of Public Artwork
Todd Grove Park (APN 001-090-02)
3
message proposed in this mural could be seen as controversial and was undertaken without the
benefit of public review.
As this mural was undertaken without the benefit of review by the Community Development
Department, Design Review Board, and Planning Commission, input from stakeholders was
limited and ultimately resulted in the work being paused for approximately two years while City
Staff sought to reconcile the desires of the Applicant with the City’s Public Art Policy.
After numerous Staff consultations, the mural, as presently conveyed, is more responsive to its
immediate social and physical environment. It can be supported by Staff, given that it now meets
all criteria identified in the City’s Public Art Policy. The Public Art Policy, included below, lists the
following factors that may be considered by the Planning Commission when considering the
selection of artwork for installation in public places:
• Qualifications of the Artist: Artists may be selected based on their qualifications as
demonstrated by past work, and the appropriateness of their concepts to the project.
• Quality of the Artwork: Of highest priority are the design capabilities of the Artist and the
inherent quality of the Artwork.
• Artistic Value: Public Artwork shall have a recognized aesthetic value.
• Media: All forms of visual arts should be considered.
• Appropriateness to Site: Artwork designs shall be appropriate in scale, material, form
and content to their immediate social and physical environments.
• Size and Weight for Outdoor Artwork: Public Artwork located in an outdoor Public Place
shall be of appropriate and suitable weight to sustain interaction with the public.
• Appropriateness to City’s Public Art Purpose: Artworks should address a commitment
to enhancing Public Places, creating a sense of place and giving character to
neighborhoods.
• Permanence: Consideration shall be given to structural and surface integrity,
permanence and protection of the proposed artwork against theft, vandalism, weather,
and excessive maintenance and repair costs.
• Public Liability: Safety conditions or factors that may bear on public liability must be
considered in selecting an Artist or Public Artwork.
• Diversity: Public Artwork shall strive for diversity of style, scale, media and artists,
including ethnicity and gender of Artists selected.
• Communication: The ability of the Public Artwork to effectively communicate should be
taken into consideration.
• Maintenance: Consideration shall be given to the type and scope of maintenance
necessary to preserve the Public Artwork in a Public Place.
AGENCY COMMENTS
This project was not distributed for agency review and comment, but Staff coordinated and
involved the Department of Community Services in the evaluation of this offer of public art to
ensure that ongoing considerations, such as maintenance were addressed. Pursuant to the Public
Art Policy, the proposed mural was reviewed by the Design Review Board with the
recommendation that the proposed slogan “No human is illegal on stolen land” be relocated to a
less prominent location, or that an alternative slogan be identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
The proposed Project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15301, Existing Facilities (a) interior or exterior alterations
involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances with no
expansion of use. This project involves exterior improvements to a developed public facility
Page 11 of 52
Staff Report | Mural Permit
Todd Grove Park Mural – Offer of Public Artwork
Todd Grove Park (APN 001-090-02)
4
structure that involves no construction. There are no unusual circumstances that would result in
a reasonable possibility of a significant effect, and the project is determined to be consistent with
the applicable general plan designation and policies, including applicable public art regulations.
As such, the Project qualifies for the aforementioned CEQA exemption.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept the offer of public artwork, as presented
based on the Findings in Attachment 1 and the Conditions of Approval in Attachment 2.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Findings
2. Draft Conditions of Approval
3. Application Materials
Page 12 of 52
Findings | Mural Permit
Todd Grove Park Mural – Offer of Public Artwork
Todd Grove Park (APN 001-090-02)
1
ATTACHMENT 1
DRAFT FINDINGS
MURAL PERMIT - TODD GROVE PARK
APN (001-090-02)
The Community Development Department’s recommendation for conditional approval of a Mural
Permit at Todd Grove Park, as described in the application materials and Staff Report dated
October 4, 2023 is based in part on the following findings, in accordance with UCC §3225(g).
1. The mural would not be incompatible with the building, site or surrounding environment.
The proposed mural would be located on the exterior walls of the Todd Grove Park restroom,
near the primary playground facility. The mural would not be incompatible with the site or
surrounding environment, as the Applicant has worked to refine the message and theme of the
mural to the satisfaction of the City’s Community Development Department, as well as the
Design Review Board. The mural is located within a public park that features similar art
installations on nearby public structures, such as the adjacent pool and swimming area.
Reflecting on the theme of community diversity, the mural’s location within Todd Grove Park,
which often serves as a gathering place reflects the community’s diversity and celebrates the
contributions of its many constituencies. By enhancing the aesthetic appeal of an
undistinguished structure, Todd Grove Park is made more attractive and engaging for visitors.
2. The mural would have a negligible impact on motorists and traffic hazards.
No aspect of the mural could be construed as impacting the ability of motorists to navigate a
public or private street, as it is centered in Todd Grove Park, disconnected from any public or
private right of ways.
3. The mural does not contain written messages or additional advertising signage.
No aspect of the mural could be construed as advertising signage. While there is written text,
it is incorporated into the mural as a component of the design.
4. The proposed Project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15301, Existing Facilities (a) interior or exterior
alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances
with no expansion of use.
5. The Notice of the Public Hearing was provided in the following manner, in accordance with
UCC §9262 and 3225(g): published in the Ukiah Daily Journal on October 1, 2023; posted on
the Project site on September 29, 2023; posted at the Civic Center (glass case) 72 hours prior
to the public hearing; and provided to property owners within 300 feet of the project parcels on
September 29, 2023.
Page 13 of 52
Draft Conditions of Approval | Mural Permit
Todd Grove Park Mural – Offer of Public Artwork
Todd Grove Park (APN 001-090-02) 1
1
ATTACHMENT 2
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
MURAL PERMIT - TODD GROVE PARK
APN (001-090-02)
The following Conditions of Approval shall be made a permanent part of the Mural Permit; shall
remain in force regardless of property ownership and shall be implemented for this entitlement to
remain valid.
Approved Project Description: Consideration of an offer of public artwork in Todd Grove Park that
would formalize existing mural components on a public structure and approve a proposal for the
remaining portion consistent with the City’s Public Art Policy
CITY OF UKIAH SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Approval is granted to allow a mural as described in the project application and subsequent
documents submitted to the Community Development Department.
2. This approval is not effective until the 10-day appeal period has expired without the filing of a
timely appeal. If a timely appeal is filed, the project is subject to the outcome of the appeal and
shall be revised as necessary to comply with any modifications, conditions, or requirements
that were imposed as part of the appeal.
3. All use, construction and the location thereof shall conform to the application and to any
supporting documents submitted therewith, including any maps or sketches accompanying the
application or submitted by applicant in support thereof.
4. If any condition is violated or if any required approval is not obtained, then the approval granted
shall be null and void; otherwise to continue in full force and effect indefinitely until otherwise
terminated.
5. The approved Project may be revoked through the City's revocation process if the approved
project is not being conducted in compliance with the stipulations and conditions of approval;
or, if the project is not established within two (2) years of the effective date of approval; or, if
the established Project for which approval was granted has ceased or has been suspended for
twenty-four (24) consecutive months.
6. Except as otherwise specifically noted, any Project approval shall be granted only for the
specific purposes stated in the action approving such Project and shall not be construed as
eliminating or modifying any building, use, or zone requirements except as to such specific
purposes. Nor shall the mural deviate from the project conveyed within the Application materials
and approved by the Planning Commission.
7. The applicant shall obtain and maintain any permit or approval required by law, regulation,
specification or ordinance of the City of Ukiah and other Local, State, or Federal agencies as
applicable.
8. Graffiti shall be removed from the mural within a timely manner and the mural shall be
maintained for aesthetic quality.
Page 14 of 52
Draft Conditions of Approval | Mural Permit
Todd Grove Park Mural – Offer of Public Artwork
Todd Grove Park (APN 001-090-02) 2
2
9. The Applicant shall not conduct work or prohibit access to any pedestrian or vehicular right of
way.
Page 15 of 52
Planning Permit Application
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS/CROSS STREETS: AP NUMBER(S):
APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT: PHONE NO: FAX NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS:
APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT ADDRESS: CITY: STATE/ZIP:
PROPERTY OWNER IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT/AGENT: PHONE NO: FAX NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS:
PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT CITY: STATE/ZIP:
HAS YOUR PROJECT RECEIVED A PRELIMINARY REVIEW? YES NO
□AIRPORT LAND USE COMM.
DETERMINATION REFERRAL
100.0800.611.003
$ □REZONING – PLANNED DISTRICT
100.0800.611.001
$ □USE PERMIT – AMENDMENT
100.0400.449.001
$
□ANNEXATION
100.0800.611.001
$ □SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT –
AMENDMENT 100.0400.449.001
$ □USE PERMIT – MAJOR
100.0400.449.001
$
□ APPEAL
100.0400.449.001
$ □SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT –
MAJOR 100.0400.449.001
$ □USE PERMIT – MINOR
100.0400.449.001
$
□GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
100.0800.611.001
$ □SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT –
MINOR 100.0400.449.001
$ □VARIANCE – MAJOR
100.0400.449.001
$
□MURAL PERMIT
100.0400.449.001
$ □SPECIFIC/MASTER PLAN
100.0800.611.003
$ □VARIANCE – MINOR
100.0400.449.001
$
□PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING
100.0800.611.003
$ □MINOR SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP (4 OR FEWER LOTS)
100.0800.610.001
$ □ZONING AMENDMENT MAP OR
TEXT
100.0800.611.001
$
□STAFF RESEARCH (MORE THAN 1
HOUR)
10023100.41153
$ MAJOR SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP
(5 OR MORE LOTS) 100.0800.610.001
$ □REZONING
100.0800.611.001
$
□LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OR
MERGER
100.0800.610.001
$ □OTHER $ □OTHER $
COUNTY CEQA FILING FEE:
CHECK PAYABLE TO MENDOCINO CO.
$ MAJOR PERMIT DEPOSIT: $ FILING DATE:
COUNTY CEQA (NEG DEC) FEE:
CHECK PAYABLE TO MENDOCINO CO.
$ MINOR PERMIT FEE: $ TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $
COUNTY CEQA (EIR) FEE:
CHECK PAYABLE TO MENDOCINO CO.
$ TOTAL FEE: $ RECEIPT NUMBER:
APPLICATION NUMBER(S):
Recommendation: Prior to submitting an application, discuss your project with Staff to discover what fees (sewer,
water, in-lieu park fees, traffic impact fees, etc.) may be required for your project. Also, ask about street tree
requirements, required sidewalk repairs, drainage issues, storm water mitigation requirements, frontage improvements,
etc.
Community Development Department
Planning Division
300 Seminary Ave., Ukiah CA 95482
Email: planning@cityofukiah.com
Web: www.cityofukiah.com
Phone: (707) 463 -6268
Fax: (707) 463-6204
N/A
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 16 of 52
Project Description
Please attach a written project description including summary of work (both interior and exterior for construction and
operation) and/or business proposed. The purpose of the project description is to assist Staff in understanding the
project. The project description will also be included in the Staff Report required to review (and ultimately approve or
deny) the planning permit. Providing complete information will help expedite the project review process and in
determining what additional information, if any, related to the project and required environmental review is required.
Environmental Review and Reports
Please be aware that projects are required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Projects
will be reviewed by Staff for compliance with CEQA and Staff will determine the appropriate CEQA document to prepare
for the project (exemption, negative declaration, etc.). In order to make this determination, specific reports (traffic,
arborist, soils, etc.) and or additional information may be required.
Use Information
Please provide the following information related to the use of the site and building:
Description of Building & Site
Parcel Size: Building Size: Number of Floors:
Use of Building (check all that apply) Description Square Footage Number of Units/Suites
□Office (business/professional)
□Office (medical/dental)
□Retail
□Light Industrial
□Residential
□Other:
Operating Characteristics
Days and Hours of Operation:
Number of Shifts: Days and Hours of Shifts:
Number of Employees/Shift:
Loading Facilities: □ Yes □No Type/Vehicle Size:
Deliveries:
□Yes □No
Type: Number (day/week/month): Time(s) of Day:
Outdoor areas associated with
use? (check all that apply)
□Yes □No
Sales area:
□Yes □No
Square Footage:
Unloading of deliveries:
□Yes □No
Square Footage:
Storage:
□Yes □No
Square Footage:
Noise Generating Use? □Yes □No Description:
To Be Completed by Staff
General Plan Designation: Zoning District: Airport Land Use Designation:
City’s Architectural & Historic
Inventory:
□ YES □ NO
Age of Building: Demolition Policy:
Hillside:
□ YES □ NO
Flood Designation FIRM Map: Flood Designation Floodway Map:
Tree Policies
General Plan Open Space Conservation
□ NO □ YES GOAL/POLICY #:
Community Forest Management Plan
□ NO □ YES GOAL/POLICY #:
Landscaping and Streetscape Design Guidelines
□ NO □ YES GUIDELINE #:
Commercial Development Design Guidelines
□ NO □ YES GUIDELINE #:
Tree Protection and Enhancement Policy
□ NO □ YES NOTES:
Tree Planting and Maintenance Policy
□ NO □ YES NOTES:
UCC: Street Tree Policy, Purpose and Intent
□ NO □ YES NOTES:
Other:
Notes
Page 17 of 52
Page 18 of 52
Page 19 of 52
Page 20 of 52
Page 21 of 52
Page 22 of 52
Page 23 of 52
Page 24 of 52
Page 25 of 52
Page 26 of 52
Page 27 of 52
Page 28 of 52
Page 29 of 52
Page 1 of 1
Agenda Item No: 13.b.
MEETING DATE/TIME: 10/11/2023
ITEM NO: 2023-3074
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Receive Planning Commissioners Training from City Attorney's Office and Discuss and/or Ask
Questions as Necessary.
DEPARTMENT: Community
Development PREPARED BY: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
PRESENTER: David Rapport, City Attorney; Darcy Vaughn,
Assistant City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
1. AB 1234 Self-Study Outline
2. Brown Act Outline
3. Ethics training forms - sign in sheet certificate
Summary: Planning Commissioners will receive a training presentation from the City Attorney's Office.
Background: "AB 1234 requires elected officials (City Council) and appointed officials (Planning Commission)
to take two hours of ethics training if they receive compensation for their service or are reimbursed for their
expenses." Training on the Ralph M. Brown Act is also useful for Planning Commissioners.
Discussion: The City Attorney's Office will provide training on ethics (AB 1234) and the the Brown Act. A Self-
Study Materials Outline for AB 1234 is provided in Attachment 1, and a Brown Act Outline is provided in
Attachment 2.
Staff recommends Planning Commission receive the training presentation and discuss with the City Attorney's
office any questions as necessary. At the conclusion of the training, Commissioners will sign the sign-in sheet
and receive a certificate of completion (Attachment 3).
Recommended Action: Receive Planning Commissioners training presentation from City Attorney's Office
and discuss and/or ask questions as necessary.
Page 30 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
AB 1234 Self-Study Materials
Part I: Financial Interests and Perks
AB 1234 requires elected and appointed officials to take two hours of ethics training if they receive
compensation for their service or are reimbursed for their expenses.1 The ethics training requirement may also
apply to agency employees designated by the agency’s legislative body.2
There are many ways to satisfy this requirement, including in-person training and self-study activities.
Moreover, like all ethics laws, AB 1234 is a floor, not a ceiling. Local officials can demonstrate their
commitment to ethics in public service by going beyond AB 1234’s minimum requirements.
This self-study exercise is eligible for one hour of AB 1234 self-study credit (or half of the minimum
requirement). To claim self-study credit, log on to www.ca-ilg.org/AB1234selfstudy, print out and take the test,
mail it to the address indicated with the $37.50 processing fee. This fee covers grading the test, providing the
correct answers (and explanations) and your proof of participation certificate.
Scope of This Self-Study Exercise
These materials cover the first two areas of ethics training required by AB 1234:
▪Laws relating to personal financial gain by public officials (including bribery and conflict of interest laws);
and
▪Laws relating to office-holder perks, including gifts and travel restrictions, personal and political use of
public resources and prohibitions against gifts of public funds. 3
It also covers ethics principles related to these laws and ethics in public service in general.
Self-study materials that cover governmental transparency and fair process laws may be found here: www.ca-
ilg.org/post/ab-1234-self-study.
Note that public service ethics laws are extraordinarily complex. The learning objective of both self-study and
in-person AB 1234 training courses is to familiarize local officials with when they need to consult agency
counsel, the Attorney General or the Fair Political Practices Commission about a given situation or course of
action.
Moreover, the ethics laws and training requirements of AB 1234 are both minimum standards. Just because a
course of action is legal doesn’t mean that it is ethical or that the public or media will perceive it to be so. Local
officials are strongly encouraged to go beyond the minimum standards set forth in the law and participate in
additional educational activities relating to their legal and ethical obligations as public servants.
Financial Gain
Key Concepts
The principle underlying the financial gain laws is that the possibility of personal financial gain or loss cannot
be a factor in your decisions as a public official. The laws in this area are designed to promote the general
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 31 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
ethical values of responsibility and trustworthiness. Public servants have a responsibility to act always in the
public’s interest, and the public needs to be able to trust that they will.
Key Laws
The following laws are designed to avoid both the reality and the appearance of personal financial gain
influencing public servants’ actions.
▪ Bribery. Requesting, receiving or agreeing to receive money in exchange for an official action is a crime.
Under the state’s criminal laws, a “bribe” includes anything of value; it also includes receiving
“advantages.” 4The advantage can be a future one and need not involve the payment of money.5
▪ Disqualification Based on Financial Interests. A public official may not make, participate in or influence
a governmental decision that will have a foreseeable and material financial effect on the official, the
official’s immediate family or any of the official’s economic interests.6 Note the breadth of the prohibition: it
does not just apply to voting, but the entire process leading up to voting.
▪ Interests in Contracts Prohibited. A public official may not have a financial interest in any contract
made by the board or body of which the official is a member.7 The law is very strict on this point. Such
contracts are void—meaning that the public agency will not have to pay the official for the benefits
provided to the agency under the contract.8 Under most circumstances, the prohibition cannot be avoided
by disqualifying oneself from participating in the decision on the contract.
▪ Helping Prospective Employers. A public official may not influence agency decisions when the interests
of a prospective employer are at stake.9 This situation arises when someone is negotiating or has “any
arrangement” concerning prospective employment with someone with business before the agency.
▪ Revolving Door. Elected officials and top-level managers cannot represent individuals or entities before
their agencies for one-year after leaving office.10
Note that some local agencies have adopted even more restrictive prohibitions.
Page 32 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
The “Leave the Room” Requirement
If you are disqualified from participating on a specific agenda item under the conflict of interest rules
established by the Political Reform Act, you must:11
▪ At the meeting, publicly identify the financial interest or potential conflict of interest in sufficient
detail to be understood by the public.
▪ Not attempt to influence the decision in any way (this includes pre-meeting discussions with staff or
colleagues).
▪ Refrain from discussing or voting on the matter (you should ask the item to be considered
separately if it is on the consent calendar).
▪ Leave the room until after the discussion, vote and any other disposition of the matter, unless the
matter is on the consent calendar.
There are limited exceptions that allow a disqualified official to remain in the room and participate
in the discussion as a member of the public when one’s “personal interests” are at stake. Consult
with your agency attorney about what kinds of personal interests qualify.
Consequences of Missteps
The consequences of violating these requirements can be severe. They include criminal felony or
misdemeanor prosecutions. Conviction can involve substantial fines, jail time and loss of office. Civil fines can
also add up. For example, the administrative penalty for violation of the Political Reform Act is a fine of up to
$5,000 per violation. In most instances, officials targeted for civil enforcement actions will pay tens of
thousands of dollars in defense costs, significantly more in criminal cases.
There can also be other kinds of negative consequences. For example, if an official violates proscriptions
against self-dealing relating to contracts, the official may have to refund amounts paid under the contract. If a
decision is tainted by the participation of someone who should have disqualified him or herself, the decision is
subject to invalidation.
Page 33 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
Financial Interests Affected by an Agency Decision:
When to Seek an Attorney’s Advice
Talk with your agency attorney when 1) an action by your public agency 2) may affect (positively or
negatively 3) any of the following:
Income. Any source of income of $500 or more (including promised income) during the prior 12
months for you or spouse/domestic partner.
Real Property. A direct or indirect interest in real property of $2,000 or more that you or your
immediate family (spouse/domestic partner and dependent children) have, including such interests as
ownership, leaseholds (but not month-to-month tenancies) and options to purchase, especially when
any of these are located within 500 feet of the subject of your decision.
Personal Finances. Your or your immediate family’s (spouse/domestic partner and dependent
children) personal expenses, income, assets, or liabilities.
Gift Giver. A giver of a gift of $520 (for 2021-22) or more to you in the prior 12 months, including
promised gifts.
Lender/Guarantor. A source of a loan (including a loan guarantor) to you.
Contract. You or a member of your family would have an interest (direct or indirect) in a contract with
the agency.
Business Management or Employment. An entity for which you serve as a director, officer, partner,
trustee, employee, or manager.
Business Investment. An interest in a business in which you or your immediate family (spouse/
domestic partner and dependent children) have a direct or indirect investment worth $2,000 or more.
Related Business Entity. An interest a business that is the parent, subsidiary or is otherwise related
to a business if you:
▪ Have a direct or indirect investment worth $2,000 or more; or
▪ Are a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or manager.
Business Entity Owning Property. A direct or indirect ownership interest in a business entity or trust
of yours that owns real property.
Campaign Contributor. A campaign contributor of yours (if you are sitting on an appointed decision-
making body).
Other Personal Interests and Biases. You have important, but non-financial, personal interests or
biases (positive or negative) about the facts or the parties that could prevent you from making a fair
decision.
What Will Happen Next? Agency counsel will advise you whether 1) you can participate in the
decision and, 2) if a contract is involved, whether the agency can enter into the contract at all. Counsel
may suggest asking either the Fair Political Practices Commission or the State Attorney General to
weigh in. Keep in mind the attorney’s duty is to promote compliance with the ethics laws, not try to find
ways around them.
Page 34 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
Personal Advantages and Perks
Key Concepts
The principle underlying the “no perks” laws is that one’s status as a public servant and one’s access to public
resources should not afford special privileges. There are two categories of “no perk” laws. One relates to
perks that others provide public officials (for example, gifts). The other involves advantages that officeholders
provide themselves (for example, use of public resources).
The laws in this area are designed to promote the general ethical values of fairness, responsibility and
trustworthiness. For example, receipt of perks from others undermines the public’s trust that decision-makers
are treating everyone who comes before them fairly and making decisions solely in the public’s interests.
When officeholders give themselves perks, the public’s trust that these officeholders are being careful and
public-minded stewards of taxpayer resources is undermined. To the extent that some of these perks involve
political advantages, they undermine the fairness of campaigns and elections.
Key Laws
Generally speaking, the “no perks” laws bar some transactions and require disclosure of others. The laws are
complex and the following will help you “spot” the issue so you can consult agency counsel for further
information about the rules in a given instance.
▪ Loans. Officials cannot receive loans from those within the agency12 or with whom the agency contracts
(except for bank or credit card indebtedness made in the regular course of the company’s business).13
Personal loans over $500 from others must meet certain requirements (for example, be in writing, clearly
state the date, amounts and interest payable).14
▪ Gifts. With certain exceptions, a public official must disclose most gifts of $50 or more on his or her
Statement of Economic Interests and may not receive gifts from any one source that totals over $520 in a
single year (for 2021-22).15 Gifts include meals, certain kinds of travel payments, and rebates or discounts
to public officials not offered to others in the usual course of business.16
▪ Travel Expenses from Non-Transportation Companies. Gifts of travel expenses (for example, airfare,
lodging, meals and entertainment) from non-transportation companies are generally subject to the gift
rules and must be reported on one’s Statement of Economic Interests as such.
▪ Travel Passes from Transportation Companies. State law strictly forbids elected and appointed public
officials from accepting free or discounted travel from transportation companies.17 The penalty for
violating the prohibition against accepting travel passes from transportation companies is severe--an
immediate forfeiture of office.18
▪ Receiving Gratuities or Rewards. It is a crime to receive any kind of gratuity or reward for performing
one’s duties.19
▪ Honoraria. State law regulates the degree to which public officials may receive payments for giving a
speech, writing an article or attending a public or private conference, convention, meeting, social event,
meal or similar gathering.20 Generally such payments—which are known as honoraria--are prohibited.
The notion is such communications are part of a public official’s service.
Page 35 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
▪ Personal Use of Public Resources. State law forbids public officials from using public resources for
personal purposes.21 “Public resources” include such things as 1) staff time, 2) office equipment
(telephones, fax machines, photocopiers, and computers), and 3) office supplies (stationery, stamps, and
other items). “Personal” use of public resources includes activities that are for personal enjoyment, private
gain or advantage.22 For example, asking a staff member to pick up your laundry or kids from daycare
would be a violation. “Use” means the use of public resources that is substantial enough to result in a
gain or advantage for the user and a loss to the local agency that can be estimated as a monetary
value.23
▪ Expense Reimbursement. The general rule is that local agency officials may only be reimbursed for
actual and necessary expenses.24 Cities, counties, and special districts that reimburse their elected and
appointed officials must adopt expense reimbursement policies that specify the kinds of activities that will
be reimbursable.25 Local agencies must use expense report forms and all expenses must be documented
with receipts.26 These documents are public records subject to disclosure.27
▪ Limits on Public Official Compensation. Typically, there is a legal limit on elected public official
compensation levels, either in state or local law public officials, particularly elected ones, may only collect
and retain such compensation that the law allows.28 As protectors of the public purse, courts generally
take a strict approach to public official compensation limits.29
City and county officials typically receive a monthly salary for their service. Special district directors
tend to be compensated by a daily stipend. With certain exceptions, this stipend compensates such
directors for:
▪ A meeting of any “legislative body” as defined by the Brown Act
▪ A meeting of an advisory body
▪ Conference attendance or educational activities, including ethics training30
Agencies may compensate officials for attendance at other events as specified in a written policy adopted
in a public meeting.31
▪ Use of Public Resources for Political Purposes. The same statutes that prohibit the use of public
resources for personal benefit also prohibit the use of such resources for campaign purposes.32 The
prohibition applies to campaigns to elect candidates and campaigns in support of or opposition to ballot
measures.
▪ Mass Mailings at Public Expense. State law forbids sending mass mailings at public expense.33 State
law defines “mass mailings” as including mailings that “feature an elected officer” by including their
photograph or signature, or by singling out the officer by a manner in which their name appears in the
document.34
▪ Gifts of Public Resources or Funds. California’s constitution forbids gifts of public funds. This
prohibits, for example, paying for spouses, partners or family members to accompany public officials.35 It
can also be an issue when a public agency contemplates charitable contributions.36
Page 36 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
▪ Soliciting Political Support from Agency Employees. Soliciting campaign funds from agency officers
or employees is also unlawful,37 as is conditioning employment decisions on support of a person’s
candidacy.38 Compensation decisions may not be tied to political support.39
▪ Speak with your agency counsel about the specifics of these requirements as they may apply to your
situation.
Consequences of Missteps
The consequences of violating the “no-perk” laws can also be severe. For example, the prohibitions against the
personal use of public resources are punishable by a $1,000 per day fine plus three times the value of the
resource used.40 Criminal penalties include a two to four year prison term and disqualification from office.41
Prosecution under the federal income tax evasion laws is also a possibility.42 Again, this does not include the
costs of hiring defense lawyers, which can add up to tens of thousands of dollars, if not more.
Beyond the Minimum in Understanding Public Service Ethics
Like all ethics laws, AB 1234 sets minimum standards. The enforcement mechanism for
complying with AB 1234’s requirements relies on public scrutiny and media attention.
Records of officials’ compliance with AB 1234 (proof of participation certificates) are public
records and must be maintained for at least five years.43
In addition to maintaining records on compliance with the minimum standards imposed by
AB 1234, local agencies may also want to maintain records of any training and study local
agency officials engaged in above and beyond AB 1234’s minimum requirements. This will
enable those inquiring to ascertain the agency’s and individual’s full scope of commitment
to understanding the ethical and legal obligations associated with public service.
Beyond the Law
Understanding and complying with public service ethics laws is a challenge. But the public expects even more
of its public servants. Rather than making decisions purely on the fly, how can public officials maximize the
likelihood that they will meet or exceed the public’s expectations for ethical conduct?
To be considered successful as a public servant, one is encouraged to think in terms of ethical values not
minimum standards. Some key values relating to public service include responsibility, trustworthiness, respect
and fairness. Assess decisions you have to make against these standards.
In addition, you can ask yourself these kinds of questions:
▪ What decision, behavior or course of action will best promote the public’s trust in my leadership and that
of my agency?
Page 37 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
▪ Would I want to read about a certain course of action on the front page of my local newspaper?
▪ How do I want to be remembered as a public official? What would make my family and parents proud as
a legacy?
For example, even if you are not legally required to disqualify yourself from participating in a decision, you may
want to voluntarily abstain from participating if you believe the public could reasonably question whether you
could put personal relationships and interests aside in making a given decision.
Conclusion
Former British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once observed “...that all power is a trust; that we are accountable
for its exercise.” As extensive and complicated as they are, the above rules relating to public service ethics are a
reflection of that overarching quest for accountability and trust.
For more information on these rules, go to www.ca-ilg.org/ethicslaws. For more information on ethics principles,
please visit www.ca-ilg.org/ethicsprinciples.
References
1 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53235(a), (b).
2 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53234(c).
3 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53235(a), (b).
4 Cal. Penal Code § 7
5 Id. See also People v. Anderson, 75 Cal. App. 365 (1925).
6 See Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 87100 and following.
7 Cal. Gov’t Code § 1090.
8 Cal. Gov’t Code § 1092. Thomson v. Call, 38 Cal. 3d 633, 646 (1985)
9 Cal. Gov’t Code § 87407.
10 See Cal. Gov't Code §87406.3.
11 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 87105.
12 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 87460(a), (b).
13 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 87460(c), (d).
14 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 87461.
15 Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 87200, 87207, 89503; 2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18940.2 (The gift limit is modified every two years to reflect changes in the
Consumer Price Index; the $520 (2021-22)
16 Cal. Gov’t Code § 82028(a).
17 See Cal. Const. art. XII, § 7 (“A transportation company may not grant free passes or discounts to anyone holding an office in this State . . .”).
18 See Cal. Const. art. XII, § 7 (“. . .acceptance of a pass or discount by a public officer . . . shall work a forfeiture of that office . . .”).
19 Cal. Penal Code § 70.
20 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 89501 (definition of honoraria).
21 See Cal. Penal Code § 424; Cal. Gov’t Code § 8314.
22 Cal. Gov’t Code § 8314(b)(1).
23 Cal. Gov’t Code § 8314(b)(4).
Disclaimer: Open meeting practices continue to evolve as the COVID-19 crisis continues and agencies use a wide range of
technology to meet their needs. The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is n ot
intended to provide legal advice to any individual or entity. ILG urges you to consult with your own legal advisor before taking any
action based on this information.
Page 38 of 52
AB 1234 TEST 1 SELF-STUDY MATERIALS
24 Cal. Gov’t Code § 36514.5.
25 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53232.2(b).
26 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53232.3.
27 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53232.3(e).
28 For example, the salary of council members of general law cities is controlled by Government Code section 36516(a), which permits a city council
to establish by ordinance a salary up to a ceiling determined by the city’s population. The electorate may approve a higher s alary. Cal. Gov’t Code
§ 36516(b). A council member appointed or elected to fill a vacancy is compensated in the same amount as his or her predecessor. A directly-
elected mayor may receive additional compensation with the consent of the electorate or by ordinance of the city council. Cal . Gov’t Code §
36516.1. See also Cal. Educ. Code §§ 1090 (county board of education compensation), 35120 (school board member compensation), 72425
(community college board member compensation).
29 Id.
30 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53232.1(a).
31 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53232.1(b).
32 Cal. Penal Code § 424; People v. Battin, 77 Cal. App. 3d 635 (1978) (successful criminal prosecution of county supervisor for misusing public
funds for improper political purposes), superseded on other grounds by People v. Conner, 34 Cal. 3d 141 (1983). See also Cal. Gov’t Code § 8314
(“‘Campaign activity’ means an activity constituting a contribution as defined in Section 82015 or an expenditure as defined in Section 82025.
‘Campaign activity’ does not include the incidental and minimal use of public resources, such as equipment or office space, f or campaign purposes,
including the referral of unsolicited political mail, telephone calls and visitors to private political entities.”).
33 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 89001.
34 See Cal. Gov’t Code 89002
35 75 Cal. Op. Att’y Gen. 20 (1992) (finding paying a spouse’s expenses to a conference violates both Government Code section 1090 and
constitutional prohibitions against gifts of public funds). See also 65 Cal. Op. Att’y Gen. 517, 521 (1982) (finding Government Code section 36514.5
does not authorize reimbursement of the expenses of any person other than a member of the city council). See also Albright v. City of South San
Francisco, 44 Cal. App. 3d 866, 869-870 (1975). (unauthorized reimbursement is illegal gift).
36 See generally McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, § 39.25 (3d rev. ed. 1988) (“Appropriations to charitable or nonprofit associations, without
consideration [something in return], cannot be made.”)
37 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 3205 (except for those communications to a significant segment of the public that happens to include fellow public officials
and employees).
38 See Cal. Gov’t Code § 3204, which reads as follows: No one who holds, or who is seeking election or appointment to, any office or employment
in a state or local agency shall, directly or indirectly, use, promise, threaten or attempt to use, any office, authority, or influence, whether then
possessed or merely anticipated, to confer upon or secure for any individual person, or to aid or obstruct any individual per son in securing, or to
prevent any individual person from securing, any position, nomination, confirmation, promotion, or change in compensation or position, within the
state or local agency, upon consideration or condition that the vote or political influence or action of such person or anoth er shall be given or used
in behalf of, or withheld from, any candidate, officer, or party, or upon any other corrupt condition or consideration. This proh ibition shall apply to
urging or discouraging the individual employee’s action.
39 ??
40 Cal. Gov’t Code § 8314(c)(1).
41 Cal. Penal Code § 424.
42 See 26 U.S.C. §§ 7201, 7203.
43 Cal. Gov’t Code § 53235.2.
Page 39 of 52
2
Summary of the Ralph M. Brown Act
October 10, 20211
Introduction
The Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) (codified at Govt C §54950 et seq.) requires meetings of
“legislative bodies” of local agencies to be open and public.2 The Brown Act also has a
constitutional component. In 2004, the California Constitution was amended to recognize “[t]he
people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business,
and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall
be open to public scrutiny.”3 In 2014, the California Constitution was again amended to require all
local agencies to comply with the Brown Act.4
What Is a Legislative Body?
The term “legislative body” under the Act includes the following:
x The governing body of a local agency (including those of charter and general law cities) or
any other local body created by state or federal statute.
x Any permanent or temporary advisory or decision-making commission, committee, board, or
other body created by charter, ordinance, resolution, or formal action of a legislative body.
x Standing committees, regardless of their composition, that have either
x Continuing subject matter jurisdiction; or
x A meeting schedule fixed by charter, ordinance, resolution, or other formal action of the
legislative body.5
What is not a Legislative Body?
The term “legislative body” excludes less-than-a-quorum advisory committees composed solely
of members of the legislative body, provided they are not standing committees that have
continuing subject matter jurisdiction or a meeting schedule fixed by charter, ordinance,
resolution, or formal action of a legislative body.6 These types of committees are commonly
referred to as “ad hoc” committees. To be an ad hoc committee exempt from the Brown Act, the
body should have a defined task and be of limited duration.7
1 This paper is a condensed version of Chapter II (Open Meeting Laws) of the California Municipal Law
Handbook, 2021 Edition.
2 Govt C §54953(a).
3 Cal Const art I, §3(b)(1).
4 Cal Const art I, §3(b)(7).
5 Govt C §54952(a), (b).
6 Govt C §54952(b).
7 79 Ops Cal Atty Gen 69 (1996).
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 40 of 52
3
What Constitutes a Covered Meeting?
A meeting is any congregation of a majority of the members of a legislative body at the same time
and location (including permitted teleconference locations) to hear, discuss, deliberate or take
action on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.8
Even though that definition has a physical focus—a congregation of a majority at the same time
and place—the Brown Act also prohibits a majority of the members of a legislative body, outside
an open and noticed meeting, from using a series of communications of any kind, directly or
through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take any action on any item of business within
the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.9
Are there Exemptions to the Brown Act?
1. “Individual Contacts”
Individual contacts or conversations between a member of a legislative body and any other person
are permitted, as long as the communications do not result in a serial meeting.10 Thus, it is clear
that a citizen may lobby, one by one, a majority of the members of a legislative body. Further,
substantive staff briefings are permitted to answer questions and provide information to individual
members of a legislative body if staff does not serve as an intermediary and communicate to
members of the body the comments or positions of other members.11
PRACTICE TIP The due-process-based restrictions on ex parte contacts during consideration of
quasi-judicial matters exist independently of the Brown Act and may restrict individual
contacts on such matters.12 Many cities have policies or practices that require members of
legislative bodies to either avoid ex parte contacts entirely or disclose ex parte contacts with
applicants or members of the public before participating in quasi-judicial matters.
2. Conferences and Seminars
Attendance of a majority of the members of a legislative body at a conference or similar gathering
is not a meeting subject to the Brown Act if the gathering
x Is open to the public;
x Involves a discussion of issues of general interest to the public or to public agencies of the
type represented by the legislative body; and
x A majority of the members do not discuss among themselves, other than as part of the
scheduled program, business of a specific nature that is within the subject matter jurisdiction
of the local agency.13
3. Open Community Meetings
The attendance of a majority of the members of a legislative body at an open and publicized
meeting organized to address a topic of local community concern by a person or organization
8 Govt C §54952.2(a).
9 Govt C §54952.2(b)(1).
10 Govt C §54952.2(c)(1).
11 Govt C §54952.2(b).
12 See Petrovich Dev. Co. v. City of Sacramento (2020) 48 CA5th 963 (review denied).
13 Govt C §54952.2(c)(2).
Page 41 of 52
4
other than the local agency is not a meeting governed by the Brown Act. The exemption applies
as long as a majority of the members do not discuss among themselves, other than as part of the
scheduled program, business of a specific nature that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of
the legislative body.14
4. Meetings of Other Legislative Bodies
The attendance of a majority of the members of a legislative body at an open and noticed meeting
of another legislative body of the local agency, or of another local agency, does not become a
meeting of the first legislative body. This exemption allows, for example, a majority of a city council
to attend a meeting of that city’s (or another city’s) planning commission. The exemption applies
as long as a majority of members of the first legislative body do not discuss among themselves
business of a specific nature that is within their subject matter jurisdiction, other than as part of
the scheduled meeting of the second legislative body.15
5. Social or Ceremonial Gatherings
The attendance of a majority of the members of a legislative body at a purely social or ceremonial
occasion (such as a wedding, holiday party, or swearing-in ceremony) is not a meeting governed
by the Brown Act. The exemption applies as long as a majority of the members do not discuss
among themselves business of a specific nature that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the
legislative body.16
6. Meetings of Standing Committees
The attendance of a majority of the members of a legislative body at an open and noticed meeting
of a standing committee of that body is not a meeting of the legislative body, provided that the
members of the legislative body who are not members of the standing committee attend only as
observers.17 The phrase “only as observers” means the attending members may be physically
present at the committee meeting but may not ask questions, make statements, or sit in their
usual places on the dais.18
Are “Serial” or “Seriatim” Meetings Covered by the Brown Act?
A congregation of a majority of the members of a legislative body outside a properly noticed and
duly convened meeting during which they discuss, deliberate, or take action on a matter within
their subject matter jurisdiction is prohibited.19
The Brown Act also prohibits use of a series of communications, of any kind, among a majority of
members of a legislative body, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take
action on any item of business that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.
These are commonly referred to as serial or seriatim meetings.20 Unlawful seriatim meetings can
occur through
14 Govt C §54952.2(c)(3).
15 See Govt C §54952.2(c)(4).
16 See Govt C §54952.2(c)(5).
17 Govt C §54952.2(c)(6).
18 81 Ops Cal Atty Gen 156 (1998).
19 Govt C §54952.2; Frazer v Dixon Unified Sch. Dist. (1993) 18 CA4th 781, 795.
20 Govt C §54952.2(b)(1); Stockton Newspapers, Inc. v Redevelopment Agency (1985) 171 CA3d 95.
Page 42 of 52
5
x In-person contacts among a majority of members of a legislative body;
x Technological contacts (such as fax, email, text message, telephone, or social media) among
a majority; or
x Contacts with a majority through staff members or others acting on behalf of the body or one
of its members.21
However, the ban on seriatim meetings does not prevent a staff member from engaging in
separate conversations or communications, outside of a meeting, with members of a legislative
body to answer questions or provide information regarding a matter that is within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the local agency, if the staff member does not communicate to members of
the legislative body the comments or position of any other member of the legislative body.22
How Does the Brown Act Apply to Social Media?
Members of a legislative body may use certain internet-based social media platforms to answer
questions from the public, provide information to the public, or solicit information from the public
regarding a matter within the legislative body’s subject matter jurisdiction.23 The platform must be
“open and accessible to the public,” which means that “members of the general public have the
ability to access and participate, free of charge, in the social media platform without the approval
by the social media platform or a person or entity other than the social media platform, including
any forum and chatroom, and cannot be blocked from doing so, except when the internet-based
social media platform determines that an individual violated its protocols or rules.”24
However, a majority of the members of the legislative body may not use any social media platform
to “discuss among themselves” official business.25 In the context of social media, “discuss among
themselves” means “communications made, posted, or shared on an internet-based platform
between members of a legislative body, including comments or use of digital icons [i.e., emojis]
that express reactions to communications made by other members of the legislative body.”26
A single contact between two public officials (less than a quorum) normally would not constitute
a prohibited serial meeting. However, on social media, a member of a legislative body may not
“respond directly” to any communication relating to a matter within the subject matter jurisdiction
of that agency that is made, posted, or shared by any other member of the legislative body.27
PRACTICE TIP Members of the same legislative body should be advised not to comment on each
other’s posts.
What Are the Noticing Requirements for Meetings?
21 See Stockton Newspapers, 171 CA3d at 102; 84 Ops Cal Atty Gen 30 (1998).
22 Govt C §54952.2(b)(2).
23 Govt C §54952.2(b)(3)(A).
24 Govt C §54952.2(b)(3)(B)(iii).
25 Govt C §54952.2(b)(3)(A).
26 Govt C §54952.2(b)(3)(B)(i).
27 Govt C §54952.2(b)(3)(A).
Page 43 of 52
6
1. Regular Meetings
Each legislative body except advisory committees and standing committees must take formal
action to establish a time and place for holding regular meetings. Meetings of advisory committees
or standing committees for which an agenda is posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting are
considered to be regular meetings for all purposes under the Brown Act, even if the committee
does not have a regular meeting schedule.28
Regular meeting agendas must be posted at least 72 hours before the meeting in a location that
is freely accessible to the public. Agendas must also be posted on the local agency’s website, if
it has one, 72 hours before the meeting.29
2. Special Meetings
A special meeting may be called by the presiding officer of the legislative body (in the case of a
city council, the mayor or mayor pro tem) or by a majority of the members of the legislative body,
by proper delivery of required written notice and, in certain circumstances, posting on the local
agency’s website.30
At least 24 hours before a special meeting, a notice that contains the time and place for the
meeting, with a statement of the business to be transacted and an opportunity for the public to
address the legislative body on that item, must be posted in a location freely accessible to the
public.31 The notice must be delivered personally or by any other means to all members of the
legislative body (unless waived in writing before the meeting) and to any newspaper, radio, or
television station that has requested notice in writing, and received at least 24 hours before the
time of the meeting. In addition, the special meeting notice must be posted on the local agency’s
website, if one exists, at least 24 hours before the meeting.32
3. Emergency Meetings
Emergency meetings may be called in “emergency situations.” An “emergency situation” exists
when a majority of the members of the legislative body determines a “work stoppage, crippling
activity, or other activity” severely impairs the public health or safety, or a “crippling disaster, mass
destruction, terrorist act, or threatened terrorist activity” poses imminent and significant peril,
endangering the public health or safety.33 Notice of an emergency meeting is required, but may
be waived in certain instances.34
4. Teleconference Meetings (Traditional)
Teleconferencing may be used in connection with meetings, but special agenda requirements
apply. “Teleconference” is defined as “a meeting of the legislative body, the members of which
are in different locations, connected by electronic means, through either audio or video, or both.”35
The agenda must specify each teleconferencing location and must be posted at each
28 Govt C §54954(a).
29 Govt C §54954.2(a)(1).
30 Govt C §54956(a), (c).
31 Govt C §§54954.3(a); 54956(a).
32 Govt C §54956(a).
33 Govt C §54956.5(a).
34 Govt C §54956.5(b).
35 Govt C §54953(b)(4).
Page 44 of 52
7
teleconference location. Teleconference meetings must also comply with all of the following
requirements:
x The meeting must comply in all other respects with the Brown Act and is in all respects the
same as a meeting where the members are all physically present in one location;
x All votes taken during a teleconferenced meeting must be by roll call;
x At least a quorum of the members of the legislative body must participate from within the
territory over which the local agency exercises jurisdiction; and
x Each teleconference location must be accessible to the public and the public (including the
disabled) must have the same rights to address the body as if physically present.36
5. AB 361 Remote Meeting Emergency Authorization
AB 361 is an urgency bill effective October 1, 2021 and expiring on January 1, 2024. The bill
extends the teleconference procedures previously authorized by Executive Order N-29-20 to
address the current COVID-19 pandemic and allows future teleconference procedures under
limited circumstances defined in the bill. AB 361 applies to meetings during a proclaimed state of
emergency and when state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote
social distancing. (“State of emergency” is defined as a state of emergency declared by the
Governor under Government Code Section 8625.) It also applies to other states of emergency
proclaimed by the Governor where holding in person meetings would “present imminent risks to
the health or safety of attendees.” The legislative body must make an initial finding that meeting
in person would "present an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees".
AB 361 requires several procedural safeguards, such as giving the public the ability to address
the legislative body directly, providing information on how to address the body, providing either a
call-in or internet-based service option, and requiring the agency to stop the meeting if call-in or
internet-based option fails. Public members must be given a reasonable time to register to provide
public comment, comments may not be required to be submitted in advance, pre-registrations
(except as required by call-in or internet platform) are prohibited and agencies that provide a timed
public comment period shall not close the public comment period until that timed period has
expired. If the legislative body desires to continue using the teleconference exception, it must
confirm the circumstances of the state of emergency 30 days after the first teleconference meeting
and every 30 days thereafter.
What Is Required on the Agenda?
1. Agenda Descriptions
The agenda must specify the time and location of the meeting and provide a “brief general
description” of each item of business to be transacted or discussed.37 It must also provide an
opportunity for the public to address the legislative body on any item of interest to the public within
the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body, before or during the time the legislative body
considers the item.38 The agenda must designate and provide the address of a location where
36 Govt C §54953(b).
37 Govt C §54954.2(a)(1).
38 Govt C §54954.3(a).
Page 45 of 52
8
members of the public may inspect the agenda and any associated writings, such as staff reports,
and where documents delivered after the posting of the agenda may be obtained.39 The agenda
must also contain information on how a person may request a disability accommodation to
participate in a meeting.40
Agenda item descriptions “generally” need not exceed 20 words in length.41 However, agenda
descriptions should give enough information to permit a person to make an informed decision
about whether they want to attend or participate in a discussion on an issue.42
2. Items Not on the Agenda
Subject to certain exceptions, no action or discussion may occur on any item not appearing on
the posted agenda.43 Limited questions, requests, and responses on matters not appearing on
the posted agenda are allowed as follows:
x Brief responses by members of the legislative body and staff to statements or questions posed
by the public;
x Questions for clarification;
x References to staff or other resources for factual information;
x Requests to staff to report back on an issue at a subsequent meeting;
x Requests or actions to agendize a matter of business for some future meeting; and
x Brief announcements by members of the body or staff and brief reports on their activities.44
3. Closed Session Items
The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to meet privately for very limited purposes such as
litigation, labor negotiations, real property negotiations and performance evaluations of direct
hires. These “closed sessions” must be agendized in the same manner as regular and special
meetings.
After any closed session, the legislative body must reconvene in open session and make a public
report of specified actions and the vote or abstention of every member present.45
Disclosure of confidential information acquired at a closed session is prohibited, unless the
legislative body authorizes disclosure.46
39 Govt C §54957.5.
40 Govt C §54954.2(a)(1).
41 Govt C §54954.2(a)(1).
42 See San Diegans for Open Gov’t v City of Oceanside (2016) 4 CA5th 637, 643.
43 Govt C §54954.2(a)(3).
44 Govt C §54954.2(a)(3)
45 Govt C §54957.7(b).
46 Govt C §54963(a).
Page 46 of 52
9
Does the Public Have a Right to Comment?
Members of the public have a right to address the city council or other legislative body at regular
and special meetings.47 Agendas for regular meetings must provide an opportunity for the public
to address the council on any item of interest to the public within the subject matter jurisdiction of
the council, before or during the time the council considers the item.48 Special meeting agendas
must provide the public an opportunity to address the council concerning only those items
addressed in the notice of special meeting before or during consideration of such item.49
A legislative body may limit public comment to matters that serve the purpose for which the council
holds meetings.50
Members of the public cannot be required to provide their name, address, or other information as
a condition to participating in a meeting.51
Any person may record a meeting by audio or videotape, or by still or motion picture camera,
unless the legislative body makes a reasonable finding the recording cannot continue because
noise, illumination, or disruption of a view constitutes or would constitute persistent disruption of
the proceedings.52
What Are the Remedies for Violating the Brown Act?
1. Criminal Prosecution of Member of the Legislative Body
A member who attends a meeting of their legislative body when a violation of the Brown Act
occurs is guilty of a misdemeanor if the member intends to deprive the public of information to
which the member knows or has reason to know the public is entitled under the Brown Act.53
2. Civil Actions
Most actions taken in violation of the Brown Act are voidable. The district attorney or any
interested person may commence an action by mandamus or injunction to obtain a judicial
determination that an action taken in violation of specified sections is null and void.54 The party
who alleges a violation must make a written demand to the legislative body to cure or correct the
violation within 90 days from the date the action was taken, unless the action was taken in an
open session but in violation of §54954.2 (regular meeting agenda posting requirement), in which
case the written demand must be made within 30 days from the date the action was taken.55 The
legislative body may still cure or correct the defect and have the action dismissed with prejudice.56
One common approach to cure and correct a challenged action, is for a city council to consider
the challenged action in a subsequent, duly agendized open-session meeting.
47 Govt C §54954.3(a).
48 Govt C §54954.3(a).
49 Govt C §54954.3(a).
50 78 Ops Cal Atty Gen 224, 226 (1995).
51 Govt C §54953.3.
52 Govt C §54953.5.
53 Govt C §54959.
54 Govt C §54960.1.
55 Govt C §54960.1(b), (c)(1).
56 Govt C §54960.1(e).
Page 47 of 52
10
The district attorney or any interested person may also bring a civil action to ascertain the
applicability of the Brown Act to past, ongoing, or threatened actions of a legislative body and to
obtain injunctive relief to enjoin future violations.57
3. Costs and Attorney Fees Awarded Unless Unjust
A court may award a plaintiff court costs and reasonable attorney fees in an action brought under
Govt C §54960, §54960.1, or §54960.2 when it finds a violation of the Brown Act.58 The court has
discretion to deny fees only if the defendant shows special circumstances exist that would make
such an award unjust.
57 Govt C §§54960, 54960.2.
58 See Govt C §54960.5.
Page 48 of 52
PUBLIC SERVICE ETHICS
1400 K Street, Suite 205 • Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8208 • F 916.444.7535 • www.ca-ilg.org
SAMPLE FORMS AND HANDOUTS
Trainers also have certain administrative responsibilities. This section provides sample materials
to help with those responsibilities.
Sign-In Sheet. Despite the admonition on the certificate, people do tend to lose the certificates
and having a sign-in log will help trainers deal with these requests for duplicate certificates.
Proof of Participation Certificates. AB 1234 requires providers to provide proof of
participation certificates. A sample is attached.
Evaluation Forms. Trainers may also want to include an evaluation form to solicit feedback on
their presentations. A sample is also included.
G:\INSTITUTE\Ethics\AB 1234 Ethics Programs and Certification\Train the Trainer\CD 2010\2010 Final Word Docs\Sample Forms and
Handouts.doc
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 49 of 52
AB 1234 TRAINING SIGN-IN SHEET
2 Hours of Credit
[insert date and time]
[insert location]
Name (please print clearly) Signature Agency
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Page 50 of 52
AB 1234 Ethics Education
Proof of Participation Certificate
Participant Name:
Course Date & Time:
Location:
Eligible Credit: 2 Hours (Requires Attendance for Entire Session)
This course is an overview course on all public service ethics issues necessary to satisfy the requirements
of Article 2.4 of Chapter 2 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, including the following:
Laws relating to personal financial gain by public servants, including, but not limited to, laws
prohibiting bribery and conflict-of-interest laws.
Laws relating to claiming perquisites (“perks”) of office, including, but not limited to, gift and travel
restrictions, prohibitions against the use of public resources for personal or political purposes,
prohibitions against gifts of public funds, mass mailing restrictions, and prohibitions against
acceptance of free or discounted transportation by transportation companies.
Government transparency laws, including, but not limited to, financial interest disclosure requirements
and open government laws.
Laws relating to fair processes, including, but not limited to, common law bias prohibitions, due
process requirements, incompatible offices, competitive bidding requirements for public contracts, and
disqualification from participating in decisions affecting family members; and
General ethical principles relating to public service. The [insert provider name] affirms that this course satisfies the guidelines issued by the Fair Political Practices Commission and Attorney General for course sufficiency and accuracy.
To be completed by participant:
By signing below, I certify that I signed in at this session, participated in the activity described above and am
entitled to claim ______ ethics education credit hour(s).
______________________________________________________________________________
Participant Signature
NOTE TO PARTICIPANT: Please provide a copy of this proof of participation to the custodian for
such records at your agency. In addition, we recommend you make a copy of this proof of
participation for your own records to retain for at least five years. These certificates are only available
at this program; duplicates will not be issued.
Page 51 of 52
[your identifying
information]
PROVIDER EVALUATION
Your feedback is a vital part of our efforts to provide ethics education and
continuously improve our coursework. Please take a minute and let us
know what you think.
NAME:
(Optional)
OFFICE :
(Helpful)
ORGANIZATION:
(Optional)
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t Know
PLEASE RATE: The quality of the program 5 4 3 2 0
The quality of the written materials 5 4 3 2 0
Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree
The session provided me with information I will use in
analyzing ethical and legal issues I confront as a public
official.
5 4 3 2 1
I have a clearer understanding of my general ethical
obligations as a public official as a result of attending this
session.
5 4 3 2 1
I have a clearer understanding of public service ethics laws
as a result of attending this session.
5 4 3 2 1
Comments/Suggestions?
[insert date, time and location for your records]
Page 52 of 52