Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-03-03 Packet - Special Budget WorkshopPage 1 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting AGENDA Register for Virtual Ukiah City Council Regular Meeting at: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/rt/9199312935703156493 After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Alternatively, you may view the meeting (without participating) by clicking on the name of the meeting at www.cityofukiah.com/meetings. March 3, 2021 6:00 PM 1. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PROCLAMATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS 3.a. Proclamation of the Ukiah City Council Recognizing March as Women’s History Month. Recommended Action: Issue a Proclamation of the Ukiah City Council recognizing March as Women’s History Month. Attachments: 1.2021 Women's History Month Proclamation 3.b. Presentation: Update on Water Supply Conditions and City Water Supply. Recommended Action: Receive presentation. Attachments: 1.Ukiah_WaterHandout_Rd3 4. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5.a. Approval of the Minutes for the February 17, 2021, Special Meeting. Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes of February 17, 2021, a Special Meeting, as submitted. Attachments: 1.20210217 Draft Minutes Special Meeting Page 1 of 585 Page 2 of 6 5.b. Approval of the Minutes for the February 17, 2021, Regular Meeting. Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes of February 17, 2021, a Regular Meeting, as submitted. Attachments: 1.20210217 Draft Minutes Regular Meeting 6. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. 7.a. Approve Contract Amendment with Ukiah Waste Solutions for Biosolids Removal at the Wastewater Treatment Plant Recommended Action: Approve contract amendment with Ukiah Waste Solutions for Biosolids Removal at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Attachments: 1.Original Agreement 2.Amendment 1 3.Amendment 2 4.Amendment 3 5.Amendment 4 7.b. Adopt a Resolution to Approve Joining the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for Employment Practices Liability Coverage. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution to approve joining the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for employment practices liability coverage. Attachments: 1.Resolution to Participate in ERMA 7.c. Approval of Budget Amendment in the Amount of $20,000 for the Fleet and Plant Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department. Recommended Action: Approval of Budget Amendment in the Amount of $20,000 for the Fleet and Plant Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department. Attachments: None Page 2 of 585 Page 3 of 6 7.d. Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Nominating and Appointing a Member to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution Nominating and Appointing a Member to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee. Attachments: 1.CC Reso 202059 Establishing Equity and Diversity Standing Committee 2.081915 13a6 Boards and Commissions Appts Reso making appointments 3.Equity and Diversity Committee Application1_Redacted 7.e. Approval of Contract with Industrial Tests, Inc. in the Amount of $36,650, Plus Taxes and Shipping for Electrical Maintenance and Testing of the Main Plant Breakers at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Recommended Action: Approve contract with Industrial Tests, Inc. in the amount of $36,650, plus taxes and shipping, for electrical maintenance and testing of the main plant breakers at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Attachments: 1.Industrial Tests, Inc. 7.f. Consider Approval of a Purchase of the Cardiac Arrest System Assessment from Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) and Corresponding Budget Amendment. Recommended Action: Approve the purchase of the complete RQI training program for $11,000 to be split with the Ukiah Valley Fire District fiftyfifty and approve corresponding budget amendment. Attachments: 1.COVID19 Information Sheet 2.Crews Using RQI 3.RQI Machine 8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NONAGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS 10. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK REPORTS 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:15 PM) Page 3 of 585 Page 4 of 6 11.a. Consideration of Appeal of the Hearing Officer's Approval of Livestock Permit to Keep Two Male Goats at 1070 North Oak Street; Appellant is Ruth Van Antwerp. Recommended Action: Deny the appeal and uphold the Hearing Officer's decision based upon the findings of fact in the record. Attachments: 1.Div. 5, Ch. 2 LIVESTOCK (42004211) 2.Staff Report_Zoning Administrator Hearing 3.Van Antwerp.Light ZA appeal 4.Hearing Officer Decision 5.Van Antwerp Hearing Officer appeal 6.Notice of Continuance 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12.a. Receive Status Report and Consider Any Action or Direction Related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID19) Emergency Including Operational Preparedness and Response; Continuity of City Operations and Services; Community and Business Impacts; and Any Other Related Matters. Recommended Action: Receive status report and consider any action or direction related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID19) Emergency including operational preparedness and response; continuity of City operations and services; community and business impacts; and any other related matters. Attachments: None 12.b. Discussion and Possible Approval of a Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. Recommended Action: Approve the modified Vision Statement #4 as the City's Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. Attachments: 1.21721 Agenda Summary Report 2.UKGP_DraftVisionStatements_2020 3.Recommended Vision Statement 2040 General Plan 12.c. Council Update on the Status and History of the Proposed Roundabout at the Intersection of Low Gap Road and Bush Street and then to Consider Directing City Staff to Proceed with Application to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for Funding Phase Changes. Recommended Action: Authorize Staff to submit an application to the CTC for modification of funding related to the proposed project. Attachments: 1.GHD_Ukiah School Traffic Analysis_Final Report_ 18DEC2020 2.US DOT_Federal Highway Administration_MiniRoundabouts 3.Minnesota DOT_St. James MiniRoundabout 4.Ravensworth Road intersection of Fountain Head Dr – Jayhawk St_Annandale, VA Page 4 of 585 Page 5 of 6 12.d. Update on Emergency Repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main and Determine that Emergency Conditions Continue to Require the Emergency Repair. Recommended Action: Determine that emergency conditions continue to require the repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main without competitive bidding. Attachments: 1.Resolution 202063 Yosemite Drive Water Main Emergency Work 13. NEW BUSINESS 13.a. Award Professional Services Agreement to GHD Inc. in the Amount of $416,856.69 to Prepare the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for Phase 2 of the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, and Utilities Project, and Approve Corresponding Budget Amendments. Recommended Action: Award professional services agreement to GHD Inc. in the amount of $416,856.69 to prepare the plans, specifications, and estimate for Phase 2 of the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, and Utilities Project, and approve corresponding budget amendments. Attachments: 1.RFP Downtown Streetscape Road Diet Utilities Project Phase 2 2.GHD Proposal_ Downtown Streetscape Road Diet Utilities Project Phase 2_ 04FEB2021 3.GHD_Cost Proposal_ 04FEB2021 13.b. Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Disposition Agreement with Danco Communities, a California Corporation, for a MixedUse Project to Include Commercial and Affordable Housing Units on Three CityOwned Parcels on 210 East Gobbi Street. Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Disposition Agreement with Danco Communities, a California corporation, for a mixeduse project to include commercial and affordable housing units on three Cityowned parcels at 210 East Gobbi Street. Attachments: 1.ENA COU No. 1819195 Danco 2019 2.Attachment 2_Draft DA Placeholder_030321 13.c. Receive Updates on City Council Committee and Ad Hoc Assignments, and, if Necessary, Consider Modifications to Assignments and/or the Creation/Elimination of Ad Hoc(s). Recommended Action: Receive report(s). The Council will consider modifications to committee and ad hoc assignments along with the creation/elimination ad hoc(s). Attachments: 1.2021 City Council Special Assignments 14. CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION MAY BE HELD AT ANY TIME DURING THE MEETING 14.a. Conference with Legal Counsel—Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)) Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)(Number of potential cases: 3) Recommended Action: Confer in Closed Session Attachments: None Page 5 of 585 Page 6 of 6 14.b. Conference with Legal Counsel—Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)) Deciding whether to initiate litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9 (Potential Cases: 1) Recommended Action: Confer in Closed Session Attachments: None 14.c. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Vichy Springs Resort v. City of Ukiah, Et Al; Case No. SCUKCVPT201870200 Recommended Action: Confer in Closed Session Attachments: None 14.d. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov’t Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: City of Ukiah v. Questex, LTD, et al, Mendocino County Superior Court, Case No. SCUK CVPT1566036 Recommended Action: Confer in Closed Session Attachments: None 14.e. Conference with Labor Negotiator (54957.6) Agency Representative: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Employee Organizations: All Bargaining Units Recommended Action: Confer in Closed Session Attachments: None 14.f. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Cal. Gov’t Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN Nos: 15705003, 15706002, 15705004, 15705003, 15703002, 157050 01, 15705002, 15705010, 15705009, 15707001, 15707002, 00319001 Negotiator: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; Negotiating Parties: Dave Hull and Ric Piffero Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment Recommended Action: Confer in Closed Session Attachments: None 15. ADJOURNMENT Please be advised that the City needs to be notified 72 hours in advance of a meeting if any specific accommodations or interpreter services are needed in order for you to attend. The City complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the front counter at the Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482, during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda. Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Dated: 2/26/2021 Page 6 of 585 Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item No: 3.a. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2020-291 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Proclamation of the Ukiah City Council Recognizing March as Women’s History Month. DEPARTMENT: City Clerk PREPARED BY: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk PRESENTER: Councilmember Rodin. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2021 Women's History Month Proclamation Summary: Council to issue a proclamation recognizing March as Women’s History Month. Background: The City celebrates and honors women and their contribution to our community annually during the month of March. In March of 1983, the first Women's History Gala Celebration in Mendocino County was held at the Anderson Valley High School. Thereafter, each year, until 2020, it has been held in the Ukiah Civic Center with the March 3rd Celebration marking its 38th anniversary. Discussion: At the March 3, 2021, Regular Meeting, the City Council will issue a Proclamation (Attachment 1) recognizing March as Women’s History Month. In addition to the proclamation, the Mendocino Women’s Political Coalition typically commemorates the occasion with a Women’s History Gala at the Ukiah Civic Center Women’s. However, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, Women’s History Month will be celebrated at an outdoor event this coming August on the coast and will honor the 100-year anniversary of women winning the right to vote. Recommended Action: Issue a Proclamation of the Ukiah City Council recognizing March as Women’s History Month. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Councilmember Rodin and Helen Sizemore Page 7 of 585 ROCLAMATION CITY OF UKIAH RECOGNIZING MARCH 2021 AS “WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH” WHEREAS, Women’s History Month is a celebration of women’s contributions to history, culture and society and has been observed yearly during the month of March in Mendocino County since 1983 and is annually being observed in the United States since 1987. Women’s History Month 2021 will take place from Monday, March 1 through Wednesday, March 31, 2021; and WHEREAS, the celebration marks its 38th anniversary in Mendocino County to increase and acknowledge the roles of women at all levels of the community and to become knowledgeable about issues that affect their equality and to foster networks that extend and expand the creative, social, and political strength of women; and WHEREAS, “Valiant Women of the Vote: Refusing to Be Silenced.” continues the theme from 2020 to extend centennial events canceled due to the pandemic. Celebrating the women who have fought for a woman’s right to vote in the United States and the 100th year passage of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution officially giving women that right will carry on with the declaration “Our History Is Our Strength”. The 2021 theme also recognizes the intersecting forms of discrimination women have faced, and continue to face, throughout American history and celebrates the diverse women who continue to struggle against discrimination at all level and in all forms; and WHEREAS, promoting and celebrating the equality and achievements of all women continues to be at the core of the 2021 celebration of Women’s History Month. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Ukiah hereby proclaims March, 2021, as “Women’s History Month” Signed and sealed, this 3rd day of March in the year Two Thousand and Twenty. ____________________________ Juan V. Orozco City Council, Mayor ATTACHMENT 1 Page 8 of 585 Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item No: 3.b. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-743 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Presentation: Update on Water Supply Conditions and City Water Supply. DEPARTMENT: Water Resources PREPARED BY: Sean White, Water Resources Director PRESENTER: Sean White, Water Resources Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ukiah_WaterHandout_Rd3 Summary: The Director of Water Resources will give a presentation of current water supply conditions, City water supply, and discuss outreach efforts. Background: Receive report Discussion: Receive report from the Water Resources Director, Sean White, with references to the water supply handout (Attachment 1). Recommended Action: Receive presentation. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: N/A Page 9 of 585 In the past several years, Ukiah has taken proactive steps to secure reliable water supplies for its residents and enable it to be a trusted partner for our neighbors throughout the Valley during times of water stress and drought. These steps include: Developing a state-of-the-art water recycling plant that offsets demand on the Russian River by at least 30% Developing and implementing an Urban Regional Water Plan Achieving a 20% reduction in per capita water use by 2020 Modernizing productive groundwater wells and building additional facilities Developing emergency interties so that water can be delivered to all our neighbors throughout the Valley As the largest municipal supplier of water in the Valley, Ukiah plays a critical role in water resource planning for the entire Valley by coordinating with stakeholders and providing leadership on water-saving and reuse strategies as well as maximizing available supplies. Ukiah Ensuring Affordable and Reliable Water Supplies for 2021 and the Years to Come Source for Ukiah Water: Ukiah lies in the Russian River Watershed, and depends on a combination of Russian River water and groundwater to meet water-supply demands. It has senior water rights which makes Ukiah’s water allocations and deliveries more reliable, although it is currently restrained from delivering some of that water to its neighbors on the outer edges of the Ukiah Valley with less resilient supplies. Attachment 1 Page 10 of 585 Sean White, Water & Sewer Directorswhite@cityofukiah.com Overcoming Fractured Planning For our 30,000 neighbors, there are TWELVE different water agencies in the Ukiah Valley, some of which have overlapping jurisdictions and management, competing governance structures, and widely differing levels of water reliability. Better planning for service territories and systems for collaboration amongst these overlapping districts will avoid near-term water shortages and help support smart, sustainable growth in the region. Ukiah is working with our neighbors and the State Water Board through the Mendocino County Water Resiliency Task Force – looking not only at strategies for 2021, but also at longer term solutions that will secure our water supply reliability and ensure ongoing affordable service. Preparing for Potential Drought Conditions Rain levels throughout the Winter have been low, and our Valley will likely be subject to drought conditions and water use restrictions this year. Ukiah’s recent investments in a diversified water supply with modernized infrastructure for groundwater and recycled water will help protect the region in case of extended drought. Collaboration and strategic PARTNERSHIPS Maximizing the Ability to Deliver Reliable Water Given the lessons we learned during the last drought in 2015, Ukiah continues to evaluate ways to modernize water planning and maximize the use of available resources to most effectively meet the broadest needs in the Valley. Ukiah’s water experts and regional water stakeholders are examining the limitations of current governance structures and water rights held by differing local districts. Key changes to align service territories based on resource availability could improve water reliability and protect water affordability for the whole Ukiah Valley.California’s 2019–2020 water year was the third driest in the Upper Russian River watershed in recorded history.][ Page 11 of 585 AGENDA ITEM 5a Page 1 of 2 CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting Virtual Meeting Link: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/rt/3862698010362077965 Ukiah, CA 95482 February 17, 2021 6:00 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Ukiah City Council met at a Special Meeting on February 17, 2021, having been legally noticed on February 12, 2021. The meeting was held virtually at the following link: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/rt/3862698010362077965. Mayor Orozco called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll was taken with the following Councilmembers Present: Douglas F. Crane, Mari Rodin, Josefina Duenas, Jim O. Brown, and Juan V. Orozco. Staff Present: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; David Rapport, City Attorney; and Kristine Lawler, City Clerk. MAYOR OROZCO PRESIDING. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice Mayor Brown. 2. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No public comment was received. 3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 4. NEW BUSINESS a. Mid-year Budget Report and Mid-Year Departmental Budget and Objectives Progress Review or Fiscal Year 2020-21 and Review of Draft Objectives for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Presenter: Dan Buffalo, Finance Director. PRESENTATIONS: Capital Improvement Projects – Mary Horger, Financial Services Manager. Department Reports: City Manager’s Office: Overview – Sage Sangiacomo (5:21 p.m.) City-wide Admin – Sage Sangiacomo (5:34 p.m.) Community Outreach – Shannon Riley (5:34 p.m.) Economic Development – Shannon Riley (5:38 p.m.) City Clerk – Kristine Lawler (5:42 p.m.) Emergency Management – Shannon Riley and Tami Bartolomei (5:47p.m.) Successor Agency – Sage Sangiacomo (5:52 p.m.) Note: The Community Development and Electric Utility Department presentations were continued to the next budget workshop on March 3, 2021. Page 12 of 585 City Council Minutes for February 17, 2021, Continued: Page 2 of 2 b. Review and Update, if Warranted, the Ukiah City Council Strategic Plan. Presenter: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager. Note: Agenda Item 4b was continued to the next budget workshop on March 3, 2021. 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:47 p.m. ________________________________ Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Page 13 of 585 AGENDA ITEM 5b Page 1 of 4 CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting Virtual Meeting Link: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/rt/3862698010362077965 Ukiah, CA 95482 February 17, 2021 6:00 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Ukiah City Council met at a Regular Meeting on February 17, 2021, having been legally noticed on February 12, 2021. The meeting was held virtually at the following link: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/rt/3862698010362077965. Mayor Orozco called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Roll was taken with the following Councilmembers Present: Douglas F. Crane, Josefina Dueňas, Jim O. Brown, and Juan V. Orozco. Staff Present: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; David Rapport, City Attorney; and Kristine Lawler, City Clerk. MAYOR OROZCO PRESIDING. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Rodin. City Manager Sangiacomo announced that Staff would be recommending that Agenda Item 11a be continued to the March 3, 2021, meeting at 6:15 p.m. Council Consensus to continue Agenda Item 11a – Public Hearing – to the March 3, 2021, 3. PROCLAMATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS 4. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Approval of the Minutes for the January 28, 2021, Special Meeting. b. Approval of the Minutes for the February 3, 2021, Regular Meeting. Motion/Second: Crane/Rodin to approve Minutes of January 28, 2020, a special meeting, as submitted. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None; and to approve Minutes of February 3, a regular meeting, as submitted. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Brown. 6. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION 7. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Report of Disbursements for the Month of January, 2021 – Finance. b. Award Contract (COU No. 2021-176) to Diamond D Construction, LLC for Specification 20-15, Replacing a 12-inch Water Line at Hydroelectric Plant of Ukiah CA, in the Amount of $197,000; and Approve a Corresponding Budget Amendment – Electric Utility. c. Report of Acquisition of Professional Services (Purchase Order No. 47049) from Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. In the Amount of $14,291.80 for Quarterly Water Sampling and Completion of Chemical Examination Reports for the Ukiah Landfill – Public Works. Page 14 of 585 City Council Minutes for February 17, 2021, Continued: Page 2 of 4 Motion/Second: Crane/Brown to approve Consent Calendar Items 7a-7c, as submitted. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No public comments were given. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS Presenter: Vice Mayor Brown and Councilmember Rodin. 10. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK REPORTS Presenters: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; and  Construction Projects – Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director / City Engineer.  FEMA Issue – Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director / City Engineer. 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:15 PM) a. Consideration of Appeal of the Hearing Officer's Approval of Livestock Permit to Keep Two Male Goats at 1070 North Oak Street; Appellant is Ruth Van Antwerp. Presenter: Mayor Orozco Motion/Second: Crane/Brown to continue this item to the March 3, 2021, meeting at 6:15 p.m. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Receive Status Report and Consider Any Action or Direction Related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Emergency Including Operational Preparedness and Response; Continuity of City Operations and Services; Community and Business Impacts; and Any Other Related Matters. Presenter: Tami Bartolomei, Office of Emergency Services Coordinator. Report was received. b. Update on Emergency Repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main and Determine that Emergency Conditions Continue to Require the Emergency Repair. Presenter: Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer. Motion/Second: Brown/Crane to determine that emergency conditions continue to require the repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main without competitive bidding. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. c. Possible Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 4 of the City Code Regarding the Procedure for Filling Vacancies on the Planning Commission. Presenter: Darcy Vaughn, Assistant City Attorney. Motion/Second: Crane/Rodin to adopt Ordinance Amending Division 1, Chapter 4, Article 4 of the City Code Regarding the Procedure for Filling Vacancies on the Planning Commission. Motion Page 15 of 585 City Council Minutes for February 17, 2021, Continued: Page 3 of 4 carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ORDINANCE NO. 1211 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING SECTION 1151 OF DIVISION 4, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 4 OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS. Council Consensus for Councilmember Rodin to work with Community Development staff to resolve issues on the application. d. Discussion and Possible Approval of a Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. Presenter: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director. Council Consensus directs Staff to work with Vice Mayor Brown and Councilmember Rodin to refine a Vision Statement based on Council discussion, and bring back for final consideration. e. Consider Adoption of Resolution Adopting a 2021 Advocacy Platform to Serve as Guidelines for Local, State, and Federal Legislative Matters. Presenter: Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager. Motion/Second: Crane/Brown to adopt resolution (2021-07) adopting a 2021 Advocacy Platform to serve as guidelines for local, state, and federal legislative, administrative, regulatory and court matters. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. NEW BUSINESS a. Receive Updates on City Council Committee and Ad Hoc Assignments and, if Necessary, Consider Modifications to Assignments and/or the Creation/Elimination of Ad hoc(s). Presenters: Mayor Orozco, City Manager Sangiacomo, and Various Councilmembers. Public Comment: L. Jani Sheppard. Motion by Councilmember Rodin, seconded by Councilmember Crane to adopt the updated 2021 City Council Special Assignment List with the addition of adding Councilmember Rodin as an Alternate to the Greater Ukiah Business & Tourism Alliance. Upon further discussion the maker of the motion and the second agreed to modify the motion as follows: Motion/Second: Rodin/Crane to adopt the updated 2021 City Council Special Assignment List with the addition of adding Councilmember Rodin as an Alternate to the Greater Ukiah Business & Tourism Alliance, and replace Councilmember Rodin with Councilmember Duenas on the Equity & Diversity Standing Committee. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Page 16 of 585 City Council Minutes for February 17, 2021, Continued: Page 4 of 4 b. Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Nominating and Appointing Members to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee. Presenter: Traci Boyl, Management Analyst. Public Comment: L. Jani Sheppard and Xochilt Martinez. Motion/Second: Brown/Rodin to adopt Resolution (2021-08) Nominating and Appointing Members to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Rodin, Duenas, Brown, and Orozco. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 14. CLOSED SESSION a. Conference with Legal Counsel—Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)) Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)(Number of potential cases: 3)" b. Conference with Legal Counsel—Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)) Deciding whether to initiate litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9 (Potential Cases: 1)" c. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Vichy Springs Resort v. City of Ukiah, Et Al; Case No. SCUK-CVPT-2018-70200 d. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov’t Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: City of Ukiah v. Questex, LTD, et al, Mendocino County Superior Court, Case No. SCUK- CVPT-15-66036 e. Conference with Labor Negotiator (54957.6) Agency Representative: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Employee Organizations: All Bargaining Units f. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Cal. Gov’t Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN Nos: 157-050-03, 157-060-02, 157-050-04, 157-050-03, 157-030-02, 157-050- 01, 157-050-02, 157-050-10, 157-050-09, 157-070-01, 157-070-02, 003-190-01 Negotiator: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; Negotiating Parties: Dave Hull and Ric Piffero Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment No Closed Session was held. 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:42 p.m. ________________________________ Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Page 17 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 7.a. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-723 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Approve Contract Amendment with Ukiah Waste Solutions for Biosolids Removal at the Wastewater Treatment Plant DEPARTMENT: Finance PREPARED BY: Seth Strader, Administrative Analyst PRESENTER: Sean White, Water Resources Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. Original Agreement 2. Amendment 1 3. Amendment 2 4. Amendment 3 5. Amendment 4 Summary: Council will consider approving a contract amendment with Ukiah Waste Solutions for Biosolids Removal at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Background: The City of Ukiah’s Wastewater Treatment plants treats and processes approximately 1,700 tons of biosolids annually. Biosolids produced at the Wastewater Treatment Plant are treated to meet Class “B” requirements per EPA 40 CFR, 503. Biosolids are dewatered on a belt filter press with solids content 18% or greater. The biosolid hauling services consist of leaving a trailer or drop box at the treatment plant to allow loading at staff’s convenience. When the container is full, the contractor is called to remove and route the biosolids for an accepting, pre-approved disposal site. Discussion: On December 16, 2015, Council approved a two-year contract with Ukiah Waste Solutions for the removal of biosolids. Please see Attachment 1 for a copy of the contract. On December 20, 2017, Council approved Amendment 1, extending the agreement for another year and increasing cost from $48.00 $50.00 per ton; see Attachment 2 for a copy of this Amendment. Council later approved two similar amendments adding additional years to the agreement and revising the price per ton. See Attachment 3 & 4 for copies of these Amendments. Staff is requesting the approval to amend the existing contract for one additional year, increasing the cost from $54.00 per ton to $56.00 per ton. Please see Attachment 5 for a copy of the proposed Amendment 4. Recommended Action: Approve contract amendment with Ukiah Waste Solutions for Biosolids Removal at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 84027225.52100: $159,053.61 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: 1516143 Page 18 of 585 Page 2 of 2 COORDINATED WITH: Sean White, Director of Water/Sewer Utilities, Mary Horger, Financial Services Manager Page 19 of 585 Page 20 of 585 Page 21 of 585 Page 22 of 585 Page 23 of 585 Page 24 of 585 Page 25 of 585 Page 26 of 585 Page 27 of 585 Page 28 of 585 Page 29 of 585 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 30 of 585 Page 31 of 585 CITY OF UKIAH AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO CONTRACT 1516143 BETWEEN UKIAH WASTE SOLUTIONS and THE CITY OF UKIAH This Amendment No. 4, entered on February 17, 2021, revises the Contract for Biosolid removal dated March 30, 2015 between the City of Ukiah and Ukiah Waste Solutions, as follows. 1.Contract price: Unit price will be revised from $54.00 per ton to $56.00 per ton. 2.Contract Term: Contract term has been extended to December 31, 2021. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all other terms remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AMENDMENT ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE: UKIAH WASTE SOLUTIONS BY: DATE: PRINT NAME: CITY OF UKIAH BY: DATE: SAGE SANGIACOMO, CITY MANAGER ATTEST BY: DATE: KRISTINE LAWLER, CITY CLERK ATTACHMENT 5 Page 32 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 7.b. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-728 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution to Approve Joining the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for Employment Practices Liability Coverage. DEPARTMENT: Human Resources / Risk Management PREPARED BY: Sheri Mannion, H.R. Director/Risk Manager PRESENTER: Consent Calendar ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution to Participate in ERMA Summary: Council will consider adopting a Resolution of the City of Ukiah to approve joining the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for employment practices liability coverage. Background: At its December 2, 2020, regular meeting, Council received information and a presentation regarding the merger of the City's JPA insurance pool Redwood Municipal Insurance Fund (REMIF) and the Public Agency Risk Authority of California (PARSAC) into a new pool called California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA). On December 16, 2020, Council adopted Resolution 2020-67 approving and adopting the JPA agreement to join CIRA. Discussion: The City of Ukiah will officially become a member of CIRA on July 1, 2021. As part of the transition process, CIRA will obtain employment practices liability (EPL) coverage for its members from the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA). ERMA is a risk sharing pool that provides EPL coverage and loss prevention services to California public entities. They are the first and only statewide public sector EPL risk sharing pool with over 200 public entity members; and are accredited by the California Association of Joint Powers Authorities. They offer a variety of value-added benefits, such as training resources and workshops, investigation services, and access to legal services, which includes Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (LCW), the firm the City currently utilizes, and an attorney hotline providing one hour of free advice per month. To be considered by the ERMA Board of Directors, the City is required to submit a Council Resolution authorizing participation in ERMA, complete an application, and provide seven years of EPL loss information and the most resent financial audit. If approved by the ERMA Board, the City would join as an underlying member of CIRA. Staff recommends that Council adopts a Resolution (Attachment 1) to approve joining ERMA for EPL coverage. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution to approve joining the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for employment practices liability coverage. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A Page 33 of 585 Page 2 of 2 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: N/A Page 34 of 585 CITY OF UKIAH RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE EMPLOYMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah wishes to obtain Employment Practices Liability coverage for the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA) is a self-insured joint powers authority created for the sole purpose of Employment Practices Liability Coverage. ERMA is comprised of various public entities who risk share up to $1 million against potenti ally unlawful employment practices and discrimination claims; and WHEREAS, ERMA formed primarily due to the fact that government entities have not historically been able to secure Employment Practices Liability (EPL) coverage at a competitive cost through the commercial insurance marketplace; and WHEREAS, ERMA has met all of the high professional standards established by the California Association of Joint Powers Authorities (CAJPA) in the areas of governance, finance, claims control, safety and loss contr ol and ERMA is fully accredited by CAJPA. CAJPA’s accreditation process requires reviews by independent consultants in the areas of accounting, claims adjusting, and actuarial analysis; and WHEREAS, ERMA provides services to both Joint Powers Insurance Authorities and individual public entities; and WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah has determined that it is in the best interest to become a member of ERMA for the purpose of obtaining Employment Practices Liability coverage; and WHEREAS, ERMA requires the City of Ukiah to pass a resolution expressing the desire and commitment of the City of Ukiah’s participation in ERMA, which requires a three year minimum participation period. The City of Ukiah also understands our entity will be bound by the provisions in the ERMA Joint Powers Agreement just as though it were fully set forth and incorporated herein whether our entity had signed it individually or through an underlying Joint Powers Insurance Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF UKIAH: THAT, the City of Ukiah approves participation in ERMA; and THAT, the Human Resources/Risk Management Director on behalf of the City of Ukiah is hereby authorized to take any and all actions necessary to implement the foregoing resolution. Attachement 1 Page 35 of 585 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ukiah this 3rd day of March 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED:______________________________ Juan V. Orozco, Mayor ATTEST:______________________________ Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Page 36 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 7.c. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-729 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Approval of Budget Amendment in the Amount of $20,000 for the Fleet and Plant Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department. DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Dave Kirch, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor, Jarod Thiele, Public Works Management Analyst PRESENTER: Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: None Summary: Council will consider approval of a budget amendment in the amount of $20,000 for the Fleet and Plant Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department. Background: During the budget development process for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, Staff analyzed prior years' expenditures and recommended a budget for the current year. Discussion: City Staff, at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, reduced the budgets for these line items assuming less use. However, this did not occur. Now, Staff is requesting approval of a budget amendment for two accounts. The first account is 20324100.58410, Garage Lubricant. This account is where the bulk purchases of oil, antifreeze, DEF Fluid, transmission fluid, etc. is charged, until each department is subsequently billed for their use. The second account is 20324100.58510, Reimbursable Jobs. This account is where expenses are charged for the purchase of re-sale materials and part, for work performed for other agencies such as Hopland and Redwood Valley Fire Departments and the District Attorney's office. Revenue in the amount of approximately $21,000 has been received this Fiscal Year from other agencies. Staff is requesting approval of a budget amendment in the amount of $10,000 for each account. Recommended Action: Approval of Budget Amendment in the Amount of $20,000 for the Fleet and Plant Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 20324100.58410- $8,000; 20324100.58510- $10,000 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: 20324100.58410- $18,000; 20324100.58510- $20,000 FINANCING SOURCE: Fleet Maintenance Fund Balance PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Page 37 of 585 Page 2 of 2 Page 38 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 7.d. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-690 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Nominating and Appointing a Member to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee. DEPARTMENT: City Clerk PREPARED BY: Traci Boyl, City Manager's Office Senior Analyst PRESENTER: Consent Calendar ATTACHMENTS: 1. CC Reso 2020-59 - Establishing Equity and Diversity Standing Committee 2. 08-19-15 13a6 Boards and Commissions Appts - Reso making appointments 3. Equity and Diversity Committee Application1_Redacted Summary: Council will review and consider adopting a resolution making a nomination and appointment to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee. Background: On July 1, 2020, the City Council established an Equity and Diversity Ad Hoc committee consisting of Vice-Mayor Orozco, Councilmember Mulheren, and support staff from the City Manager’s Office, to ensure a comprehensive approach to continue the forward progress and evolution of our agency and service to our community. The Ad Hoc reviewed research and analysis regarding community demographics, and City staff diversity demographics, and internal policies and procedures. The Ad Hoc concluded that a Standing Committee would be the most effective and efficient mechanism to ensure extensive ongoing community engagement from the diversity of demographic groups within the City of Ukiah, successful plan development and implementation, and to provide a process for annual review, oversight, and updates as necessary. On October 7, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-59 to establish an eleven (11) member Equity and Diversity Standing Committee, and set forth the procedure for filling vacancies (Attachment 1). The structure of the standing committee is designed to ensure optimal representation from the diverse demographic groups represented in the population of the City of Ukiah and the larger community living and working in the Ukiah Valley. The Standing Committee consists of eleven (11) members. The members consist of two members of the City Council and one member from each of nine organizations in the City of Ukiah or the Ukiah Valley, including Redwood and Potter Valleys which serve or represent: individuals and families who are low income, persons with physical or mental disabilities, persons from the LGBTQA community, members of Native American tribes and communities in Mendocino County, members of the Hispanic/Latino community, persons of color, people whose primary language is not English, youth ages 21 and younger, and seniors 65 years and older. On February 17, 2020, the Ukiah City Council appointed seven (7) applicants to the Equity and Diversity Committee which had been vetted to meet the position requirements. The appointed applicants filled the seats representing the following demographic categories: Persons with lived experience of poverty (currently or formerly living at or below the poverty level), Persons with physical or mental disabilities, Persons from the LGBTQA community, Native American tribes and communities in Mendocino County, Persons from the Hispanic/Latino community, Persons of color, and Youth 21 years and younger. Additionally, Councilmember Duenas replaced former Councilmember Mulheren as a Councilmember representative. Page 39 of 585 Page 2 of 2 Discussion: The Clerk's office has continued to solicit community members for the two remaining vacant committee seats since February 17, 2020. One application was received that has been vetted to meet the position requirements. Staff is recommending that Council adopt the proposed resolution (Attachment 2) nominating and appointing the following individual to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee (see Attachment 3). NAME POSITION Corrine Jones Seniors 65 years or older Staff will continue to solicit applications to fill the remaining position. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution Nominating and Appointing a Member to the Equity and Diversity Standing Committee. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: FINANCING SOURCE: PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: COORDINATED WITH: Page 40 of 585 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 41 of 585 Page 42 of 585 Page 43 of 585 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH MAKING NOMINATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS TO THE DIVERSITY AND EQUITY STANDING COMMITTEE WHEREAS, on October 7, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-59 to establish an eleven (11) member Equity and Diversity Standing Committee, and set forth the procedure for filling vacancies; and WHEREAS, the vacancies for the new committee have been noticed since October 7, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk’s office received one application, which was vetted and determined to meet the position requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ukiah City Council does hereby appoint the following persons and terms: BOARD/ COMMISSION NAME POSITION TERM ENDING Equity and Diversity Standing Committee Corrine Jones Seniors 65 years or older 3/3/2025 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March, 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: _______________________________ Juan V. Orozco, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Kristine Lawler, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 2 Page 44 of 585 EQUITY AND DIVERSITY STANDING COMMITTEE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Applicant: Attached is an application for appointment to the City of Ukiah Diversity and Equity Committee. Please review the application questions carefully, use one or more separate sheets of paper to answer the questions in Section B. Applications submitted after the submittal deadline will not be accepted. Please check with the Management Analyst to the City Manager’s Office at 707-467.5720. If you have questions about the membership requirements for the vacant position(s). The Equity and Diversity Committee aims to be diverse and to represent the community it serves. Specifically, membership will aim to represent: (1) Persons with lived experience of poverty (currently or formerly living at or below the poverty level); (2) Persons with physical or mental disabilities; (3) Persons from the LGBTQA community; (4) the Native American tribes and communities in Mendocino County; (5) Persons from the Hispanic/Latino community; (6) Persons of color; (7) People whose primary language is not English; (8) Youth 21 years and younger; (9) Seniors 65 years or older. A person is qualified to serve on the Committee if he or she satisfies the following qualifications: 1) member of an organization representing or self-identifies with any of the demographic groups identified above; and 2)living or employed by a business with a City of Ukiah business license. The City of Ukiah Equity and Diversity Committee consists of eleven members who are appointed by the Ukiah City Council to serve two-year teams. Two (2) members will represent the Ukiah City Council. Appointments will be considered and decided at a regular City Council meeting. The Committee acts in an advisory capacity to the Mayor and City Council in matters pertaining to equity, diversity, and inclusion within the agency. The Committee also aids and advises the City Manager and Executive Staff in the development of processes and procedures consistent with the Committee’s mission, goals, and objectives. The City of Ukiah Equity and Diversity Committee membership has the following responsibilities: 1. Adopt and follow a written Action Plan to address diversity, equity, and inclusion processes and procedures to be used by the City to improve equity and diversity within the City workforce and in providing municipal services and that are consistent with the Committee’s written objectives and action plan; 2. Collaborate with other Committee members to work toward the Committee’s mission, goals and objectives; 3. Abide by the Brown Act; 4. Regularly attend Diversity and Equity Committee meetings. The Committee meets monthly for regular meetings. The Management Analyst to the City Manager’s Office is the liaison to the Committee and prepares the agenda for the meetings. ATTACHMENT 3 Page 45 of 585 CITY OF UKIAH DIVERSITY AND EQUITY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT A. General Information Full Name Corinne Jones Date 02/22/2021 Residence Address (Physical Address, not PO) Mailing Address (if different from above) Home Phone Work Phone Email Cell Phone Employer Community Care Management Corporation Business Address 301 S. State Street Job Title/Position Program Director Employed Since 2018 How long have you resided in: Ukiah? 2 ½ Years Mendocino County? 2 ½ Years California? Lifelong Please list organization(s) you are with a member of and identify the demographic group(s) you self-identify or it/they represent. American Legion Auxiliary (Veterans and their families) Veterans of Foreign Wars Auxiliary (Veterans and their families) Languages spoken other than English: None B. Please answer the following questions on a separate sheet of paper. 1. What is your understanding of the purpose, role and responsibility of the Diversity and Equity Committee? 2. What is your understanding of/and ability to meet the responsibilities of committee members in regards to meeting attendance? (Can you attend regular committee meetings? Do you have any scheduling conflicts or are there any other circumstances that would prevent you from regular attendance?) 3. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives will be beneficial to the work of the Diversity and Equity Committee? 4. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on which you would be willing to serve? Corinne Jones 02/22/2021 Signature of Applicant Date Thank you for your interest in serving your community and the City of Ukiah. Please return this application and attachments to the City Clerk’s office at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482. If you have any questions, please contact the City Clerk’s office at (707) 463-6217. Page 46 of 585 Corinne Jones Supplement to Application for Ukiah Diversity and Equity Committee 1. What is your understanding of the purpose, role and responsibility of the Diversity and Equity Committee? A. My understanding of the Committee is that it will work together with the Mayor, City Council and possibly other entities within the city of Ukiah, to effect real diversity and equity among under served and underrepresented groups. This will include being a voice for those needing inclusion where discussions and plans will be developed to improve city services, work place opportunities, and access to services and processes to enrich the living experience in and around Ukiah. 2. What is your understanding of/and ability to meet the responsibilities of committee members in regards to meeting attendance? (Can you attend regular committee meetings? Do you have any scheduling conflicts or are there any other circumstances that would prevent you from regular attendance?) A. It is my understanding that the committee meets monthly for regular meetings and that these meetings are currently being held remotely due to the Covid-19 pandemic. I am available for meetings including those called due to urgent circumstances and if selected to serve; will prioritize my participation to insure my availability. 3. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives will be beneficial to the work of the Diversity and Equity Committee? A. I am an older adult (over age 65), and person of color. I hold a Masters’ Degree from USC in Gerontology and currently work with older adults as Program Director of the Multipurpose Senior Services Program, serving Mendocino and Lake Counties. I have extensive work experience and training with older adults and their needs and desires. Most seek to remain at home in the communities in which they have raised their families and spent their lives. They seek the opportunity to live a decent quality of life in which they are not alone, are free of food insecurity, can be safe from injury and abuse and merely seek to enjoy their twilight years in peace. I have engaged with the California Department of Aging’s Master Plan on Aging; AARP’s Age Friendly Communities, and California’s Aging and Disability Resource Committee. I previously served as a state certified Advocate for HICAP, and was a Volunteer District Liaison for AARP California. I care greatly about older adults and will do everything that I can to be a voice for their best interests, whenever and where ever, possible. 4. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on which you would be willing to serve? A. I am willing to consider other Committees / Commissions but have an absolute passion for older adults. Page 47 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 7.e. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-744 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Approval of Contract with Industrial Tests, Inc. in the Amount of $36,650, Plus Taxes and Shipping for Electrical Maintenance and Testing of the Main Plant Breakers at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. DEPARTMENT: Water Resources PREPARED BY: Dave Kirch, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor, Jarod Thiele, Public Works Management Analyst PRESENTER: Consent Calendar ATTACHMENTS: 1. Industrial Tests, Inc. Summary: Council will consider approval of contract with Industrial Tests, Inc. in the amount of $36,650, plus taxes and shipping, for electrical maintenance and testing of the main plant breakers at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Background: The main plant breakers at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) provide utility and emergency backup power in order to allow the plant to operate under all conditions. The current equipment was installed as part of the 2006 WWTP Plant Upgrade Project. Discussion: Preventative maintenance on this equipment is performed by the Fleet and Plant Maintenance Division. During routine inspections, it was discovered that testing and replacement of the main breakers is needed in order to prevent failures. Staff requested a proposal from Industrial Tests, Inc. (Attachment 1) to test and replace the main breakers as needed. Staff is requesting approval of a contract in the amount of $36,650 plus taxes and shipping. Funds are budgeted for this work in account 84027225.56120. Recommended Action: Approve contract with Industrial Tests, Inc. in the amount of $36,650, plus taxes and shipping, for electrical maintenance and testing of the main plant breakers at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 84027225.56120- $330,000 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: Wastewater Funds PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Sean White, Director of Water Resources; Mary Horger, Financial Services Manager Page 48 of 585 Page 2 of 2 Page 49 of 585 Page 1 of 5 INDUSTRIAL TESTS, INC. “NETA CERTIFIED, ENGINEER APPROVED” 4021 Alvis Court, Suite 1 Rocklin, CA 95677 Tel. (916) NEC-TEST www.industrialtests.com January 28, 2021 City of Ukiah 1320 Airport Rd, Ukiah, CA 95482 Attention: David Kirch Subject: Ukiah- WWTP- 2020 Electrical Maintenance and Testing Quote # 29743425 David, Based on your request, we are pleased to offer our services for the above referenced project. Industrial Tests, Inc. (ITI) has been in business for almost 40 years. With ITI’s outstanding safety record and EMR (Experience Modification Rate), we set the standard when it comes to safety in the workplace. ITI has never had a time loss incident. Our vision is to maintain your system to the standards of the International Electrical Testing Association (NETA). ITI uses all available resources to eliminate safety risks to employees and equipment. ITI, a certified Small Business, has been approved and certified by NETA, the World’s foremost authority in Electrical Testing and Maintenance. Industrial Tests, Inc. will provide calibrated test equipment and qualified technicians to perform testing of the following listed equipment, according to the cited project specifications. ITI will test within the equipment manufacturer’s recommendations and/or NETA specifications. Industrial Tests, Inc will comply with all OSHA safety regulations and requires the compliance of all personnel at job site. A written report will follow project completion. Industrial Tests, Inc. will provide one copy of any submittal, report or study required. Additional copies may be supplied at an additional charge. Attachment 1 Page 50 of 585 Page 2 of 5 EQUIPMENT IDENTIFIED TO BE TESTED: Equipment Label Description Quantity Switchgear SWR12101 5000A, 480V PowerLynx Switchboard -5000AF, 4000AT Main Breaker -3200AF, 2500AT Emergency Main Breaker -3200AF, 3200AT Tie Breaker -1600AF, 1600AT Feeder Breakers -1600AF, 800AT Spare Breaker -800AF, 600AT Feeder Breakers -800AF, 600AT Spare Breaker 1 1 1 1 2 1 8 1 * Industrial Tests, Inc. terms and conditions apply ** Proposal may be withdrawn if not accepted within 30 days *** Price does not include Overtime, Holiday or Weekend Wage rates **** Price includes Mendocino County Prevailing Wage Rates. Total $36,650.00 PROJECT INFORMATION: -Project Location: City of Ukiah WWTP- 300 Plant Rd, Ukiah, CA 95482 - Site Contact: David Kirch (707) 272-2832 - Work to be performed on M-F, during normal working hours. Tentatively scheduled for Mid-Week shift, to increase ability to source any replacement parts, if needed. - Peterson Power to provide 480V >100A temporary power source for ITI’s High Current Test Set. - Peterson Power will be temp feeding downstream pumps. Leads will be “Air- Gapped” and circuit breakers in between will be open and LOTO’d. - ITI will pay special attention to cleaning/torqueing of low voltage switchgear. -Circuit Breakers are Draw-Out Eaton Cutler Hammer, Magnum DS w/ Digitrip 1150+ Trip Units. o Pricing includes parts and labor for 4 replacement trip units 5 days lead time to get these in hands TESTING CLARIFICATIONS: Switchgear and Switchboard Assemblies Visual and Mechanical Inspection 1.Inspect physical, electrical, and mechanical condition including evidence of moisture or corona. 2.Inspect anchorage, alignment, grounding, and required area clearances. 3. Clean the unit. 4. Verify that fuse and/or circuit breaker sizes and types correspond to drawings and coordination study as well as to the circuit breaker’s address for microprocessor- communication packages. Page 51 of 585 Page 3 of 5 5. Verify that current and voltage transformer ratios correspond to drawings. 6. Confirm correct operation and sequencing of electrical and mechanical interlock systems. 1.Attempt closure on locked-open devices. Attempt to open locked-closed devices. 2.Make key exchange with all devices included in the interlock scheme as applicable. 7. Use appropriate lubrication on moving current-carrying parts and on moving and sliding surfaces. 8.Verify correct barrier and shutter installation and operation. 9.Exercise all active components. 10.Inspect mechanical indicating devices for correct operation. 11.Verify that filters are in place and/or vents are clear. 12.Perform visual and mechanical inspection of instrument transformers. 13. Inspect control power transformers. 1. Inspect for physical damage, cracked insulation, broken leads, tightness of connections, defective wiring, and overall general condition. 2. Verify that primary and secondary fuse ratings or circuit breakers match drawings. 3. Verify correct functioning of draw-out disconnecting and grounding contacts and interlocks. Electrical Tests 1.Perform insulation–resistance tests for one minute on each bus section, phase-to- phase and phase-to-ground. 2.Perform electrical tests on instrument transformers. 3.Determine accuracy of all meters. 4. Control Power Transformers 1.Perform insulation-resistance tests. Perform measurements from winding- to-winding and each winding-to-ground. 2.Verify correct function of control transfer relays located in switchgear with multiple power sources. 5. Verify operation of switchgear/switchboard heaters and their controller, if applicable. Low Voltage Power Circuit Breakers Visual and Mechanical Inspection 1. Inspect physical and mechanical condition. 2. Inspect anchorage, alignment, and grounding. 3.Verify that all maintenance devices are available for servicing and operating the breaker. 4. Clean the unit. 5.Inspect arc chutes, if applicable. Page 52 of 585 Page 4 of 5 6. Inspect moving and stationary contacts for condition, wear, and alignment, if applicable. 7.Verify cell fit and element alignment. 8. Verify racking mechanism operation, if applicable. 9. Use appropriate lubrication on moving current-carrying parts and on moving and sliding surfaces. 10.Record as-found and as-left operation counter readings, if applicable. Electrical Tests 1.Perform insulation-resistance tests for one minute on each pole, phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground with the circuit breaker closed, and across each open pole. 2.Perform a contact/pole-resistance test. 3.Determine long-time pickup and delay by primary current injection. 4.Determine short-time pickup and delay by primary current injection, if applicable. 5. Determine ground-fault pickup and delay by primary current injection, if applicable. 6. Determine instantaneous pickup current by primary current injection, if applicable. 7.Reset all trip logs and indicators. 8.Verify operation of charging mechanism. Any additional work above and beyond the scope listed will be billed on a time and material basis per Industrial Tests, Inc. (ITI) Selling Policy. Also, the firm price listed is based on all equipment noted above being on site and accessible at one time. During the event where ITI must make additional trips due to unavailable equipment, additional charges will be billed for extra travel and mobilization based on ITI’s standard rate sheet. Page 53 of 585 Page 5 of 5 CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES: 1.Pay all invoices upon receipt, not subject to retentions or “owner held” progress payments. 2.Provide one (1) qualified electrician as needed to identify the equipment to be tested and perform all switching (de-energize and energize) functions. 3.During high voltage (1000V and above) testing, and as necessary for other work, Industrial Tests, Inc will erect a temporary barricade around our work area using Red Danger Tape and High Voltage Signs per OSHA Standard 1910.269. All personnel are directed not to cross this barrier as it could result in loss of life, injury and/or punitive damages. 4.Provide test power within 50 feet of the test site. Industrial Tests will require 100A at 480 volts when performing primary injection testing of circuit breakers greater than 400A (Peterson Power Systems to Provide). 5.Provide any necessary device specific equipment, i.e. test plugs, computer cables, etc. 6.Provide the most recently updates single line drawing and specs. 7.Supply all electrical drawings and manuals of the items to be tested. I look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, Diego Increta INDUSTRIAL TESTS, INC. O: 916.632.8378 C: 916.660.3021 Diego@IndTest.com Proposal Accepted by ______________________________ Name ______________________________ Date ______________________________ PO # ______________________________ Quote Ref. # ______________________________ Page 54 of 585 CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SERVICE Page 1 of 2 Industrial Tests, Inc., Revision 1.6 dated 8-21-2019 1-17-2014 TERMS & CONDITIONS The sale of any service and incidental goods ordered by the Customer is expressly conditioned upon the terms and conditions contained or referred to herein. Any additional or different terms and conditions set forth in the Customer’s purchase order or similar communication are objected to and will not be binding upon Industrial Tests, Inc. unless specifically agreed to in writing by Industrial Tests, Inc. authorized representative. Authorization by the Customer, whether written or oral, to furnish services and incidental goods will constitute acceptance of these terms and conditions. 1.SERVICE DEFINITIONS • INSTALLATION/REPAIR/MAINTENANCE is any combination of planning, management, labor, tools and incidental goods to move, install, assemble, modify, repair, modernize, start-up and/or maintain equipment. • FIELD TESTING SERVICE is engineering and technical guidance, advice and counsel based upon INDUSTRIAL TESTS, INC. current engineering, manufacturing, installation and operating practices, as related to work performed by others. • JOB MANAGEMENT is any combination of planning, scheduling, monitoring, selection of crews, as specified in the contract documents, but does not include responsibility for supervision of labor or for the quality or acts of craft labor. • TRAINING is an instructional course prepared and provided by personnel proficient in the subject matter. • ENGINEERING ADIVSORY SERVICE is system study and analysis of equipment or systems by competent, experienced personnel using special techniques, instruments or devises with the objective of reporting opinions or recommendations relating to the current condition and future serviceability of the equipment or system. 2.WARRANTY a.Industrial Tests, Inc. warrants to the Customer that goods and services sold will be free from defects in material, workmanship and title and will conform to any mutually agreed upon specifications. If any failure to meet this warranty appears within one year from the date of shipment of the goods or completion of the services, on the condition that Industrial Tests, Inc. be promptly notified in writing thereof, Industrial Tests, Inc. will correct any such failure by re-performing any defective portion of the services furnished and supplying conforming goods. If the contract covers installation, repair or maintenance, Industrial Tests, Inc. will correct the failure by re-performing any defective service, and either repairing or replacing (at its option) any defective goods furnished and any damage to the equipment upon which the service was performed resulting from defective service. If re-performance is not practicable, Industrial Tests, Inc. will furnish without charge services in an amount essentially equal to those which, in Industrial Tests, Inc. sole judgment would have been required for re-performance. If the contract covers job management, Industrial Tests, Inc. sole obligation will be to replace the job manager for the balance of the job. If the contract covers training; Industrial Tests, Inc. sole obligation will be to replace the assigned instructor and re-perform the training. b.The preceding paragraph sets forth the exclusive remedy for all claims based on failure of, or defect in, goods or services sold hereunder, whether the failure or defect arises before or during the warranty period, and whether a claim, however instituted, is based on contract, indemnity, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise. The foregoing warranty is exclusive and is in lieu of all other warranties whether written, oral, implied or statutory. AS TO ALL GOODS SOLD; NO IMPLIED STATUTORY WARRANTY OR MERCHANT ABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE SHALL APPLY. 3.PATENTS a.Industrial Tests, Inc. warrants that the goods sold hereunder, and any part thereof shall be delivered free of any rightful claim of any third party for infringement of any Untied Stated patent. If promptly notified in writing and given authority, information and assistance Industrial Tests, Inc. shall defend, or may settle, at its expense, any suit or proceeding against the Customer based on a claimed infringement which would result in breach of this warranty, and Industrial Tests, Inc. shall pay all damages and costs awarded therein against the Customer due to such breach. In case any goods are in such suit held to constitute such an infringement and the use for the purpose intended of said goods is enjoined, Industrial Tests, Inc. shall, at its expense and option, either procure for the Customer the right to continue using said goods, or replace same with non-infringing goods, or modify same so they become non-infringing, or remove the goods and refund the purchase price (less reasonable depreciation for any period of use) and any transportation costs separately paid by the Customer. The foregoing states the entire liability of Industrial Tests, Inc. for patent infringement. b.The preceding paragraph a. shall not apply to any goods specified by the Customer and not of Industrial Tests, Inc. manufacture or manufactured to the Customer’s design, or to the use of any goods furnished hereunder in conjunction with any other goods in a combination not furnished by Industrial Tests, Inc. as a part of the transaction. As to any goods, or use in such combination. Industrial Tests, Inc. assumes no liability whatsoever for patent infringement and the Customer will hold Industrial Tests, Inc. harmless against any infringement claim arising there from. 4.EXCUSABLE DELAYS a.Industrial Tests, Inc. shall not be liable for delay due to (1) causes beyond its reasonable control, or (2) acts of God, acts of the Customer, prerequisite work by others, acts of civil or military authority, government priorities, fires, family death, strikes or other labor disturbances, floods, epidemics, war, riot, delays in transportation or car shortages, or (3) inability to obtain or delay in obtaining, due to causes beyond its reasonable control, suitable labor, materials, or facilities. In the event of any such delay, the time of performance shall be extended for a period equal to the time lost by reason of the delay. b.In the event Industrial Tests, Inc. is delayed by acts of the Customer or by prerequisite work by other contractors or suppliers of the Customer, Industrial Tests, Inc. shall be entitled to an equitable price adjustment in addition to extension of the time of performance. 5.SALES AND SIMILAR TAXES In addition to the price specified herein, the Customer shall pay, or reimburse Industrial Tests, Inc. for, the gross amount of any present or future sales, use, excise, value-added or other similar tax applicable to the price, sale or furnishing of any services or goods hereunder, or to their use by Industrial Tests, Inc. or the Customer, or the Customer shall provide Industrial Tests, Inc. with evidence of exemption acceptable to the taxing authorities. 6.PAYMENTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION a.Unless otherwise stated payment of invoice is due within 30 days of the date of the invoice. Deduct 2% of invoice amount if paid within ten days. A late fee of 2% per month will be charged for payments not made within 30 days of the date of the invoice. A 10% progress payment for scheduling and mobilization will be invoiced on signature of contracts valued at greater than $10,000. b.Pro rata payments shall become due as shipments are made or as work is completed. If Industrial Tests, Inc. consents to delayed shipments of goods, payment shall become due on the date when Industrial Tests, Inc. is prepared to make shipment. All payments shall be made without set-off for claims arising out of other sales by Industrial Tests, Inc. c.If the financial condition of the Customer at any time does not justify continued performance on the terms of payment previously agreed upon, Industrial Tests, Inc. may require full or partial payment in advance or shall be entitled to terminate the contract and receive termination charges. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the Customer or in the event any proceeding is brought against the Customer, voluntarily or involuntarily, under the bankruptcy or any insolvency laws, Industrial Tests, Inc. shall be entitled to terminate the contract at any time during the period allowed for filing claims against the estate and shall be entitled to payment for its termination charges. d.For work performed in Industrial Tests, Inc. shops, Industrial Tests, Inc., at its option, may retain possession of goods ordered or serviced under the contract if its charges for such goods or services are not paid within 90 days following completion of the work and invoicing the Customer, and Industrial Tests, Inc. may, upon not less than seven days written notice by certified mail to the Customer at the Customer’s last known address, sell the goods at public or private sale and apply the net proceeds to Industrial Tests, Inc. charges. Page 55 of 585 CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SERVICE Page 2 of 2 Industrial Tests, Inc., Revision 1.6 dated 8-21-2019 1-17-2014 e.If you cancel a job or project within 24 hours of the job or project scheduled start time, a cancellation fee of $400 will be charged. f.If you cancel a job or project within 48 hours or receipt of purchase order, there will be no cancellation fee. If you cancel a job or project after 48hours, you will be charged a cancellation fee equal to 50% of the quoted price for the job or project. You may re-schedule the initiation of the project within ninety (90) days – subject to our availability -- and 50% of the cancellation fee will be applied to your final statement. If you fail to schedule a job for any reason at all or do not re-schedule the initiation of the project within ninety (90) days of the original delivery date, you will forfeit the entire 50% cancellation fee. g.If you cancel a job or project that is in progress, without cause, you will be charged a cancellation fee equal to 75% of the maximum budgeted fee – regardless of advances already paid. You may re-schedule the completion of the project within ninety (90) days -- subject to our availability -- and 50% of the cancellation fee will be applied to your final statement. If you do not re-schedule the completion of the project within ninety (90) days of the original delivery date, you will forfeit the entire cancellation fee. 7.CHANGES, DELETIONS AND EXTRA WORK The Customer, without invalidating the contract, may make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the general scope of the work, the contract price being adjusted accordingly. All such work shall be executed under the conditions of the contract except that any claim for extension of time caused thereby shall be adjusted at the time of ordering such change. The charge for any such extra work or change shall be determined in one or more of the following ways: (1) by mutually agreed firm lump sum price; or (2) by unit prices specified in the contract or agreed upon, or (3) by cost and negotiated percentage of cost or fixed fee. 8.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY a.Industrial Tests, Inc. liability on all claims of any kind, whether based on contract, indemnity, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, for all losses or damages arising out of, connected with, or resulting from the contract, or from the performance or breach thereof, or from any goods or services covered by or furnished under the contract or any extension or expansion thereof (including remedial warranty efforts), shall in no case exceed the greater of either (1) $10,000 or (2) the contract price of a lump sum contract or the price of work completed if the contract is being performed on a cost type basis. Except as to title to any goods furnished, all such liability shall terminate upon the expiration of the warranty period specified in the article entitled “warranty”. b.In no event, whether based on contract, indemnity, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, shall Industrial Tests, Inc. its employees and suppliers be liable for special, incidental, exemplary or consequential damages including, but not limited to, loss of profits or revenue, loss of use of any property, cost of capital, cost of purchased power, cost of substitute equipment, facilities or services, downtime costs, or claims of customers of the customer for such damages and the Customer will indemnify Industrial Tests, Inc. its employees and suppliers against any such claims from the customers. If the goods or services being provided by Industrial Tests, Inc. will be furnished by the Customer to a third party by contract or relate to a contract between the Customer and a third party, the Customer shall obtain from such third party a provision affording Industrial Tests, Inc. and its suppliers the protection of this and the preceding paragraph 8.a. c.In no event shall Industrial Tests, Inc. be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever arising from its failure to discover or repair latent defects or defects inherent in the design of goods serviced (unless such discovery or repair is normally discoverable by tests expressly specified in the scope of work under this contract) or caused by the use of goods by the Customer against the advice of Industrial Tests, Inc. If Industrial Tests, Inc. furnished the Customer with advice or assistance concerning any products or systems which is not required pursuant to the contract, the furnishing of such advice or assistance will not subject Industrial Tests, Inc. to any liability whether in contract, indemnity, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise. 9.DELIVERY AND TITLE PASSAGE Delivery of goods will be made F.O.B. at the point of shipment to the Customer. Title shall pass to the Customer on a pro rata basis when equipment is placed in the hands of a carrier at the point of shipment, or as service work is performed. It is expressly understood and agreed, however, that the passage of title shall not be construed by Industrial Tests, Inc. as a release from Industrial Tests, Inc. responsibility to fully carry out its obligations under the contract. 10.GENERAL a.The delegation or assignment by either party of any or all of its duties or rights hereunder without the other party’s prior written consent shall be void, provided, however, that Industrial Tests, Inc. may subcontract work to one or more subcontractors. b.Any information, suggestion or ideas transmitted by the Customer to Industrial Tests, Inc. are not to be regarded as secret or submitted in confidence except as may be otherwise provided in a writing signed by a duly authorized representative of Industrial Tests, Inc. c.Except to the extent that Industrial Tests, Inc. has specifically agreed to provide PCB Services under this contract, if Industrial Tests, Inc. encounters, at the site, any toxic or hazardous substances or hazardous wastes (as such terms are defined in any applicable laws or regulations), Customer shall handle and/or dispose of such substances or wastes so as to allow Industrial Tests, Inc. work to safely proceed. If such substances or wastes cause an increase in Industrial Tests, Inc. cost or time of performance, an equitable adjustment shall be made in the price and schedule. d.Industrial Tests, Inc. shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws, including but not limited to, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA), laws, related to nonsegregated facilities and equal employment opportunity (including the seven paragraphs appearing in Sec. 202 of Executive Order 11246, as amended), and all standards, rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to such state and federal laws. 11.COMPLETE AGREEMENT The contract contains the complete agreement between the parties, and no modification, amendment, revision, waiver or other change will be binding on Industrial Tests, Inc. unless agreed in advance in writing by Industrial Tests, Inc. authorized representative. Any oral or written representation, warranty, course of dealing or trade usage not contained or referenced herein will not be binding on Industrial Tests, Inc. The invalidity, in whole or part, of any of the foregoing articles or paragraphs of the contract will not affect the remainder of such article or paragraph or any other article or paragraph of the contract. 12.SPECIAL CONDITIONS a.For TRAINING SERVICE add the following to Article 10: any audio or visual recording of the Training Service is prohibited unless Industrial Tests, Inc. grants advance permission in writing. b.For ENGINEERING ADVISORY SERVICE/STUDIES add the following to the end of paragraph a. of Article 2: Industrial Tests, Inc. does not warrant the accuracy of, or performance results of, any conclusions, advice, opinions or recommendations provided, nor that any desired objective will result from the service performed. Page 56 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 7.f. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-745 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Consider Approval of a Purchase of the Cardiac Arrest System Assessment from Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) and Corresponding Budget Amendment. DEPARTMENT: Fire PREPARED BY: Eric Singleton, Battalion Chief PRESENTER: Consent Calendar ATTACHMENTS: 1. COVID-19 Information Sheet 2. Crews Using RQI 3. RQI Machine Summary: Council will consider the purchase of the Cardiac Arrest System Assessment & Digital Training (HeartCode-Complete) for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), Basic Life Support (BLS) course, Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) course from RQI and corresponding budget amendment. See Attachment #1 for additional information. Background: All Fire Department staff must maintain licensure; the Ukiah Valley Fire Authority (UVFA) personnel must complete continuing education on skills maintenance and updates annually. All personnel are required to maintain a current CPR certificate. Simultaneously, all EMTs must additionally have a BLS certification, while Paramedics must also have a current ACLS and PALS certificate. Discussion: As we move into the future, our goal and commitment is to bring our training in-house instead of relying on outside resources. These external resources can become expensive for the department and cumbersome to our team members when trying to schedule a time for all members to make the classes, leading us to schedule multiple classes costing the department additional expenses. Furthermore, with the current pandemic, we face new challenges with classes not currently being offered. With this new equipment and program(s) (See Attachment #2 & #3), we can continue our mission of serving the community. The didactic portion of these new classes is online instructor-based, which are self-paced. The skills portion(s) is completed on computerized manikins, which provide up-to-date live feedback for the student in a controlled environment. Additionally, with this new training style, we can provide quality training quarterly instead of every two years annually for a fraction of the cost. Continual training optimizes staff proficiency, which is proven to increase patient’s survivability in the field. This program can not only serve the fire department, but it can benefit all city employees. According to the American Heart Association, early continuous CPR substantially increases the chance of survival. Thus all willing employees in the future can be trained for CPR taking advantage of self-paced learning. Additionally, it allows for a safe learning environment following the current state and county regulations and social distancing protocols. The total program cost is $11,000 per year with a twenty-four-month term commitment. The cost would be split between the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley Fire District. Funding for this project is being requested as new funding to come out of the general fund. This product’s yearly engagement fee is based on the Page 57 of 585 Page 2 of 2 number of users; by incorporating more departments in the city, the cost could be distributed equally from multiple funds. Recommended Action: Approve the purchase of the complete RQI training program for $11,000 to be split with the Ukiah Valley Fire District fifty-fifty and approve corresponding budget amendment. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 0 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: $5,500 FINANCING SOURCE: Ambulance Fund (71000000) PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Doug Hutchison, Fire Chief Page 58 of 585 ATTACHMENT #1 Page 59 of 585 ATTACHMENT #2 Page 60 of 585 ATTACHMENT #3 Page 61 of 585 Page 1 of 3 Agenda Item No: 11.a. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-716 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Consideration of Appeal of the Hearing Officer's Approval of Livestock Permit to Keep Two Male Goats at 1070 North Oak Street; Appellant is Ruth Van Antwerp. DEPARTMENT: Community Development PREPARED BY: Mireya Turner, Planning Manager PRESENTER: Mireya Turner, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Div. 5, Ch. 2 LIVESTOCK (4200-4211) 2. Staff Report_Zoning Administrator Hearing 3. Van Antwerp.Light ZA appeal 4. Hearing Officer Decision 5. Van Antwerp Hearing Officer appeal 6. Notice of Continuance 7. 11a Correspondence Received - Ruth Van Antwerp - Attachment 1 8. 11a Correspondence Received - Ruth Van Antwerp 9. 11a Correspondence Received - Angel Schramer Summary: Council will consider an appeal of the Hearing Officer's decision to grant approval of a Livestock Permit for two goats at 1070 North Oak Street. This item was carried over from the February 17, 2021 meeting to allow for timely notification of all parties. Background: An application submitted by Ms. Angel Schramer under the City's revised Livestock Ordinance, effective September 16, 2020, was deemed complete on November 9, 2020. The application from Ms. Schramer was to keep two male goats in a backyard pen at her residence at 1070 North Oak Street. In accordance with requirements outlined in Division 5, Chapter 2, Sections 4200 through 4211 of Ukiah City Code (Attachment 1), Zoning Administrator Craig Schlatter conducted a public hearing on December 21, 2020, and issued the Livestock Permit to Ms. Schramer, based upon the findings in UCC Section 4202- i.e. the keeping of such animals would not create a hazard to public health or safety; would not constitute a public or private nuisance; and would not otherwise seriously and injuriously affect living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties. Zoning Administrator Schlatter also granted the permit subject to conditions contained in the Staff Report for the Hearing (Attachment 2). The Zoning Administrator public hearing is accessible on the City's website at www.cityofukiah.com/meetings, December 21, 2020 Zoning Administrator Hearing. On January 4, 2021, Ruth Van Antwerp and Charlene Light appealed the Zoning Administrator's decision (Attachment 3). Per Ukiah City Code (UCC) Section 4206, appeals of Livestock Permits are to be heard by the City's Hearing Officer. The City's current Hearing Officer is Mr. Matt Finnegan, an independent practicing attorney who holds a contract with the City of Ukiah, in addition to currently one other jurisdiction, as the Hearing Officer for administrative hearings such as the Livestock Permit hearing. Hearing Officer Finnegan conducted a public administrative hearing of the appeal on January 19, 2020. The entirety of this meeting, including public input and discussion, can be accessed on the City's website, www.cityofukiah.com/meetings, by clicking on the "Livestock Permit Appeal Hearing" video for January 19, Page 62 of 585 Page 2 of 3 2021. On January 29, 2021, the Hearing Officer issued his decision, denying the appeal and upholding the decision of the Zoning Administrator to grant the Livestock Permit. His decision and exhibits are included as Attachment 4. In pages 1 through 5 of his decision, Mr. Finnegan lists in detail the reasons for denying the appeal from Ruth Van Antwerp and Charlene Light and upholding the decision of the Zoning Administrator. Primary points are summarized below: - There was no sufficient evidence on the record of appeal that the permitted livestock at 1070 N. Oak Street will create a hazard to public health or safety; or constitute a public or private nuisance; or otherwise seriously and injuriously affect living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties. - "Ukiah City Code 4203 limits the discretion of the Zoning Administrator." Because Mr. Finnegan did not find sufficient evidence of the potential of or existence of: a public health and safety hazard, a public or private nuisance, or "seriously and injurious" affect on Ms. Van Antwerp's property value or living conditions, Mr. Finnegan concludes "the permit shall issue under Ukiah City Code 4203." Regarding the two conditions Ms. Van Antwerp requested be placed on the permit, Mr. Finnegan notes on page 4 of his decision: "It is my opinion and ruling the first condition is beyond the intended jurisdiction of the livestock permit process and such unrelated conditions would be something the Zoning Administrator should not have the authority to order, consequently I will not place that condition on the issuance of the permit." "The second condition is reasonably related to the livestock permit. However it is my opinion and ruling, the lack of a visual barrier does not create one of the three conditions in Section 4202, therefore I will not require that as a condition of the permit order." On February 8, 2021, Ruth Van Antwerp appealed the decision of Hearing Officer Matt Finnegan (Attachment 5). Per UCC Section 4206, appeals of the Hearing Officer's decisions are considered and decided upon by the City Council. Attachment 6 is the Notice of Continuance posted on February 18, 2021. Discussion: Ms. Van Antwerp has requested two extra conditions be placed upon the issuance of the permit- that the animals be safe and dry and that the fence between the goats and Ms. Van Antwerp's property shield the goats from any type of view. These conditions would be in addition to the conditions of approval already approved by the Zoning Administrator. In his January 29, 2021 decision, the Hearing Officer refuted the arguments made by the Appellant for these two extra conditions to be placed upon the permit, instead affirming the issuance of the Livestock Permit as approved by the Zoning Administrator. Additionally, Ms. Van Antwerp notes in her February 8, 2021 appeal that "The City has twice stated that the goats cannot be seen from any other parcel." This statement implies the Hearing Officer is a representative of the City, or can speak on behalf of the City, which is not true. As Mr. Finnegan notes in his opening remarks at the January 19, 2021 Hearing Officer meeting, he is not an employee of the City, nor does he represent the City. Mr. Finnegan is a practicing attorney, independent from the City, who has a contract with the City to perform impartial, unbiased administrative reviews of certain permits such as the Livestock Permit. Finally, there have been no changes to the project since the date of application that would warrant additional conditions or any reasons for the upholding of the appeal (denying of the permit). Requirements outlined in UCC 4200 require the Zoning Administrator and Hearing Officer to base decisions upon findings of fact within the record, which has been accomplished through research, analysis, discussions with the applicant and appellant, and site visits. For these reasons, Staff recommends City Council deny the appeal of Ruth Van Antwerp, upholding the Page 63 of 585 Page 3 of 3 decision of the Hearing Officer and approving the issuance of the permit to Ms. Angel Schramer, in accordance with Ukiah City Code. Recommended Action: Deny the appeal and uphold the Hearing Officer's decision based upon the findings of fact in the record. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director and Zoning Administrator Page 64 of 585 2/11/2021 Div. 5, Ch. 2 LIVESTOCK https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Ukiah/#!/Ukiah05/Ukiah0502.html#4206 1/5 CHAPTER 2 LIVESTOCK SECTION: §4200 Keeping Livestock Inside City Limits Prohibited Without Permit §4201 Application For Permit §4202 Zoning Administrator To Investigate Conditions; Standards §4203 Issuance Of Permit; Form; Conditions §4204 Duration Of Permit; Termination Or Modification; Notice To Permittee §4205 Refusal To Issue Permit §4206 Administrative Hearings §4207 Appeal From Decision Of Administrative Board §4208 Effect On Persons Having Animals At Effective Date Of Chapter; Annexations §4209 Exception Of Area Of Fairgrounds §4210 Penalty For Violation §4211 Definitions §4200 KEEPING LIVESTOCK INSIDE CITY LIMITS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMIT It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to keep, harbor or maintain, or cause, permit or suffer to be kept, harbored or maintained, within the corporate limits of the City any cow, bull, calf, horse, mule, jennie, jack, burro, sheep, goat, swine or any other livestock without then and there having a valid permit in writing issued by the Zoning Administrator of the City under the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961; Ord. 1206, §1, adopted 2020) §4201 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Any person, firm or corporation required to have a permit under the provisions of this chapter shall make application for the same to the Zoning Administrator of the City. Such application shall be in writing and signed by the applicant and shall contain the following: Attachment 1 Page 65 of 585 2/11/2021 Div. 5, Ch. 2 LIVESTOCK https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Ukiah/#!/Ukiah05/Ukiah0502.html#4206 2/5 A. The name and address of the applicant. B. The type and number of such animals. C. The place where such animals are intended to be kept. D. The length of time such applicant intends to keep such animals at such place. E. Such other information as may be required by the Zoning Administrator for the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961; Ord. 1206, §1, adopted 2020) §4202 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO INVESTIGATE CONDITIONS; STANDARDS Upon receipt of an application for a permit required under this chapter the Zoning Administrator shall make an investigation to determine if the keeping of such animals as requested in the application would create or continue any of the following conditions: A. Create a hazard to public health or safety; or B. Constitute a public or private nuisance; or C. Otherwise seriously and injuriously affect living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961; Ord. 1206, §1, adopted 2020) §4203 ISSUANCE OF PERMIT; FORM; CONDITIONS If the Zoning Administrator finds that none of the conditions set forth in section 4202 of this code are present, or would be present in the event the application were granted, it shall issue to the applicant the permit requested. The permit may be unconditional or may contain such conditions as are deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator. The permit shall be in such form as prescribed by the Zoning Administrator and shall be signed by an authorized member thereof. It shall be nontransferable and shall be valid only for the location stated in the permit. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961; Ord. 1206, §1, adopted 2020) §4204 DURATION OF PERMIT; TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION; NOTICE TO PERMITTEE The permit shall continue until modified or terminated, and the same way be modified or terminated at any time whenever in the opinion of the Zoning Administrator the circumstances have changed so as to cause any of the conditions set forth in section 4202 of this code to be present. At least ten (10) days’ notice in writing shall be given the permittee prior to any modification or termination becoming effective. Placing such notice in the regular U.S. mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the permittee at the address appearing on the application shall constitute such notice. Permittee shall at all times keep the Zoning Administrator informed of any change in his address, and in the event of Page 66 of 585 2/11/2021 Div. 5, Ch. 2 LIVESTOCK https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Ukiah/#!/Ukiah05/Ukiah0502.html#4206 3/5 notification of such change such notice shall be given to permittee at such changed address rather than the address appearing in the application. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961; Ord. 1206, §1, adopted 2020) §4205 REFUSAL TO ISSUE PERMIT If the Zoning Administrator finds that any one or more of the conditions set forth in section 4202 of this code are present, or would be present in the event the application were granted, it shall refuse to issue the permit requested, and shall notify the applicant of such action and the reason therefor. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961; Ord. 1206, §1, adopted 2020) §4206 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS In any case where an applicant for a permit, a permittee, or any other interested person is dissatisfied with any determination of the Zoning Administrator relative to the presence or absence of any of the conditions mentioned in section 4202 of this code, or is aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator with respect to the issuance, modification or termination or refusal to issue, modify or terminate any permit required by this chapter, such person may apply for a hearing before the Hearing Officer of the City. Such hearing shall be held within fifteen (15) days from the date of filing the application for hearing, unless continued at the request of the appellant. Notice of the time and place of hearing shall be given the appellant, and he shall be entitled to appear in person or by counsel and present evidence. In the event such a hearing is requested by other than an applicant or permittee, any applicant or permittee affected thereby shall be given the same notice and shall have the same rights to appear and present evidence as the person requesting the hearing. The Hearing Officer shall hear and consider evidence presented at such hearing, and shall decide the issue based upon the evidence presented. A decision must be rendered in writing by such Hearing Officer within ten (10) days from the date of hearing, and a copy of any such decision shall be furnished to the person requesting the hearing, and affected applicant or permittee, and any other interested person requesting the same. The decision may reverse, affirm or modify any action of the Zoning Administrator, and may provide such other determination as the Hearing Officer may deem appropriate. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961; Ord. 1169, §2, adopted 2016; Ord. 1206, §1, adopted 2020) §4207 APPEAL FROM DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD Any person who has followed the procedure set forth in §4206 regarding administrative hearings and is dissatisfied with the decision of the Administrative Board may, within thirty (30) days thereafter, appeal to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the City Clerk. The Council shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal. The City Clerk shall give notice to such person, and to all other persons appearing at the administrative hearing, of the time and place of hearing, and each shall have the opportunity to appear thereafter in person or by counsel and present evidence. The Council Page 67 of 585 2/11/2021 Div. 5, Ch. 2 LIVESTOCK https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Ukiah/#!/Ukiah05/Ukiah0502.html#4206 4/5 shall hear and consider evidence and shall decide the issue based upon the evidence presented. The appeal and its decision shall be final. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961) §4208 EFFECT ON PERSONS HAVING ANIMALS AT EFFECTIVE DATE OF CHAPTER; ANNEXATIONS Any person, firm, or corporation having within the corporate limits of the City at the effective date of this Chapter any of the animals mentioned in §4200, shall have a period of thirty (30) days from and after the effective date of this Chapter to either apply for and receive a permit as required hereunder, or to remove such animals from within the corporate limits of the City. Any person, firm, or corporation having in any area annexed to the City subsequently to adoption of this Chapter, any such animals shall have a period of thirty (30) days from and after the date such annexation is effective to either apply for and receive such a permit or to remove such animals to without the corporate limits of the City. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961) §4209 EXCEPTION OF AREA OF FAIRGROUNDS That portion of the 12th Agricultural District Fairgrounds which is located within the corporate limits of the City is hereby excepted from the operation of this Chapter, and no permit shall be required under this Chapter to have or keep animals at such location. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961) §4210 PENALTY FOR VIOLATION Any person violating any of the provisions of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or by imprisonment for a period of not more than six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 541, §1, adopted 1961) §4211 DEFINITIONS Unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meanings when those terms are used in this chapter: HEARING OFFICER: An individual appointed by the City Council to hear and decide appeals of certain decisions made by City officials and entities, as defined further in section 23 of this code. (Ord. 1206, §2, adopted 2020) The Ukiah City Code is current through Ordinance 1208, passed November 4, 2020. Disclaimer: The City Clerk’s office has the official version of the Ukiah City Code. Users should contact the City Clerk’s office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. Page 68 of 585 2/11/2021 Div. 5, Ch. 2 LIVESTOCK https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Ukiah/#!/Ukiah05/Ukiah0502.html#4206 5/5 City Website: http://www.cityofukiah.com/ City Telephone: (707) 463-6217 Code Publishing Company Page 69 of 585 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6a Department of Community Development 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 planning@cityofukiah.com (707)463-6268 Staff Report Livestock Permit Angel Schramer; 1070 N. Oak St. File No. 20-5887 DATE: December 17, 2020 TO: Zoning Administrator FROM: Mireya G. Turner, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Request for Livestock Permit to keep two goats at 1070 North Oak Street; APN 002-072-12; File No. 20-5887 SUMMARY OWNER: Angel Schramer 1070 North Oak Street Ukiah, CA 95482 APPLICANT / AGENT: Same as above REQUEST: Livestock permit to maintain two goats within a ±1,000 sf fenced pen within a ±12,196.8 sf residential parcel DATE DEEMED COMPLETE: November 9, 2020 LOCATION: 100 ft south of Low Gap Road 200 ft north of Gibson Street; 1070 North Oak Street; APN: 002-072-12 TOTAL ACREAGE: ±0.28 acres (±12,196.8 sf) GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING DISTRICT: “R-1” Single-family Residential AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY: N/A – Outside the Airport Compatibility Land Use Zones ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Exempt, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Article 19, §15061(b)(3) Common Sense Exemption RECOMMENDATION: Conditional Approval BACKGROUND Attachment 2 Page 70 of 585 Staff Report Livestock Permit Angel Schramer; 1070 N. Oak St. File No. 20-5887 2 On September 16, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1206, amending the Ukiah City Code (UCC) to authorize the Zoning Administrator to make determinations on livestock permits. The ordinance outlines the process by which goats, among other livestock, may be kept within the Ukiah City limits. UCC §4201 lists the information required in the application. Once an application is deemed complete, Staff schedules a public hearing; during which the Zoning Administrator reviews the application package, and determines if the keeping of the requested animals would create or continue any hazards to public health or safety, constitute a public or private nuisance; or otherwise seriously and injuriously affect living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties (UCC §4202). If the Zoning Administrator find that none of the conditions are or would be present, he/she shall issue the Livestock Permit. This permit may be unconditional, or may contain such conditions as are deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator. PROJECT DESCRIPTION An application was received by Angel Schramer, owner of 1070 North Oak Street, requesting to keep two male goats in a 1,000 sf fenced pen, in the corner of her backyard as indicated by the provided site plan. The application contains responses to the required information as follows: Required Information Applicant's Response Type and number of animals Two adult male goats, debudded and wethered Place animals are to be kept: 1,000 sf fenced pen in corner of backyard (site plan provided) Length of time Applicant intends to keep such animals at such place: For the duration of the animals' lives How the area will be kept maintained and cleaned so as not to create a hazard to public health or safety The pen is deep cleaned weekly and maintained daily. Description of the supervision conditions of the animals - feeding, cleaning, waste disposal, etc. The water is changed every other day, or as deemed necessary. They are fed alfalfa daily and get lots of grains and vegetable scraps, and other treats. The bedding and manure is cleaned and put into a receptical for disposal. Description as to why the applicant believes that the keeping of the animals will not affect living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties The animals are quiet, they do not jump, they are non-aggressive, do not smell, are regularly wormed and vaccinated, and deter vermin and invasive plans, and clear vegetation that could potentially create fire hazards. They are not visible to any neighbors, and fly traps are used in the livestock pens. The slope of the yard does not cause runoff off-site. Other information as required by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Staff Staff performed a site visit. No additional information was requested. Page 71 of 585 Staff Report Livestock Permit Angel Schramer; 1070 N. Oak St. File No. 20-5887 3 SETTING The project parcel is located on North Oak Street, approximately 100 ft south of Low Gap Road and 200 ft north of Gibson Street. It is in a residential neighborhood, surrounded by parcels varying from ±0.15 acre (±6,534 sf) to ±0.33 acre (±14,375 sf) in size. The Project parcel is essentially flat and enclosed by a six foot wooden fence along the rear and side lot lines. The Project Parcel and its vicinity are seen in Figure 1. The goat pen and backyard are seen in Figures Figure 1. Aerial View Figure 2. Fenced open area of pen Page 72 of 585 Staff Report Livestock Permit Angel Schramer; 1070 N. Oak St. File No. 20-5887 4 Figure 3. Covered shelter area in pen STAFF ANALYSIS UCC §4202 requires Zoning Administrator determination if keeping the requested animals as requested in the application would create or continue conditions which create a hazard to public health or safety, constitute a public or private nuisance, or otherwise seriously and injuriously affect living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. The Application contains a detailed description of the ways the pen is maintained, both daily and through a weekly deep cleaning. The animals have been altered, wethered and debudded, to make them calmer. During the site visit, Staff witnessed a flat, clean pen, with a six-foot wooden fence between the yard and the adjacent parcels, with a shorter, wire fence enclosing the animals. Both fences appear to be in sound condition. There are no platforms or gathered debris upon which the goats could climb to escape the pen. There were no nuisance insects noted during the site visit. The animals were calm, curious and gentle upon approach. PRIVATE OR PUBLIC NUISANCE. The Application describes interaction with the goats and family members on a regular basis. The pen is maintained and was not odorous at the site visit. No loud sounds were heard from the animals during the site visit, and they are not visible from outside the Project Parcel. A few toys and pumpkins were in the pen for entertainment of the goats. There are no platforms or debris in the pen which would enable the goats to escape to neighboring parcels. Staff did not observe any trees hanging over into the pen which could be damaged. SERIOUS AND INJURIOUS AFFECT TO LIVING CONDITIONS OR PROPERTY VALUES IN ADJACENT OR NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. Please see above responses. Page 73 of 585 Staff Report Livestock Permit Angel Schramer; 1070 N. Oak St. File No. 20-5887 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15601(b)(3), Common Sense Exception, described as follows: “The activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. • The site is essentially flat, with no significant chance of runoff. • The animals are kept in a clean, open area, with sufficient shelter • The Application describes maintenance for both the animals and the pen that is adequate to keep their keeping from becoming a nuisance. NOTICE Notice of the Public Hearing was provided in the following manner, as required by UCC §9262(C): • Published in the Ukiah Daily Journal December 9, 2020 • Posted on the Project site December 11, 2020 • Posted at the Civic Center (glass case) 72 hours prior to hearing; and, • Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the parcels included in the Project on December 2, 2020. Correspondence received is included as Attachment 5. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Zoning Administrator approve the Schramer Livestock Permit to keep two goats at 1070 North Oak Street, based on the Findings found in the Staff Report, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Use Permit Findings 2. Draft Conditions of Approval 3. Application and Site Plan 4. Ordinance 1206 5. Public Correspondence Received Page 74 of 585 Findings Emerald Sun Processing, Manufacturing and Distribution Minor Modification to Minor Use Permit File No. 20-5658 1 ATTACHMENT 1 FINDINGS TO APPROVE LIVESTOCK PERMIT FOR THE KEEPING OF TWO GOATS BY ANGEL SCHRAMER AT 1070 NORTH OAK AVENUE (APN 002-072-12); FILE NO. 20-5887 The following findings are supported by and based on information contained in this staff report, the application materials and documentation, and the public record, in accordance with UCC Sections 9262 and 9263. 1. The proposed keeping of such animals would not create a hazard to public health or safety. The Application contains a detailed description of the ways the pen is maintained, both daily and through a weekly deep cleaning. The animals have been altered, wethered and debudded, to make them calmer. During the site visit, Staff witnessed a flat, clean pen, with a six-foot wooden fence between the yard and the adjacent parcels, with a shorter, wire fence enclosing the animals. Both fences appear to be in sound condition. There are no platforms or gathered debris upon which the goats could climb to escape the pen. There were no nuisance insects noted during the site visit. The animals were calm, curious and gentle upon approach. 2. The proposed keeping of such animals would not constitute a public or private nuisance. The Application describes interaction with the goats and family members on a regular basis. The pen is maintained and was not odorous at the site visit. No loud sounds were heard from the animals during the site visit, and they are not visible from outside the Project Parcel. A few toys and pumpkins were in the pen for entertainment of the goats. There are no platforms or debris in the pen which would enable the goats to escape to neighboring parcels. Staff did not observe any trees hanging over into the pen which could be damaged. 3. The proposed keeping of such animals would not cause serious and injurious affect to living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties. The care and maintenance described in the Application is sufficient to ensure the keeping of the animals will not cause serious and injurious affect to living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties. Based on the above analysis, the findings required for the Livestock Permit for the keeping of two goats by Angel Schramer, at 1070 North Oak Avenue. Page 75 of 585 Staff Report Livestock Permit Angel Schramer; 1070 N. Oak St. File No. 20-5887 ATTACHMENT 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO APPROVE LIVESTOCK PERMIT FOR THE KEEPING OF TWO GOATS BY ANGEL SCHRAMER AT 1070 NORTH OAK AVENUE (APN 002-072-12); FILE NO. 20-5887 Approved Project Description. An application was received from Angel Schramer for approval of the keeping of two male goats within a 1,000 sf fenced pen in the backyard of her residence at 1070 North Oak Street. The subject property comprises ±0.28 acres (12,196.8 sf), and includes one residence and a six- foot wooden fence enclosing the side and rear lot lines. The project comprises the following main components: • Two mature, male goats, both wethered and debudded • 1,000 sf fenced pen located at the southwestern portion of the parcel, with open area and a covered shelter • Animals are companion animals, to be kept for the duration of their lives • The water for the animals is changed every other day, or as deemed necessary. • They are fed daily with alfalfa, grains, vegetable scraps and other healthy treats. • The goats have been wethered and debudded to make them calm and quiet. • The Applicant is the primary caregiver for the animals, with the assistance of other family members. • The animals do not jump, are non-aggressive, do not smell, are regularly wormed and vaccinated. • The goats are not visible from neighboring parcels. • Fly traps are used in livestock pen, with monthly changing. • The pen area is essentially flat and will not cause runoff to neighboring parcels. The following Conditions of Approval shall be made a permanent part of the Minor Use Permit, shall remain in force regardless of property ownership, and shall be implemented in order for this entitlement to remain valid. City of Ukiah Special Conditions 1. This permit applies solely to the two goats currently residing on the parcel. It is not transferable and is valid for the duration of the lifetimes of the two goats only. 2. The Permitee shall operate in compliance with Ukiah City Code Sections 4202, 4203, 4204 and 4206. 3. Completion of a site visit by the Zoning Administrator is required prior to the permit becoming valid. City of Ukiah Standard Conditions 4. Permittee shall maintain the keeping of the two goats in a manner consistent with the project description components. Page 76 of 585 Planning Permit Application PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS/CROSS STREETS: AP NUMBER(S): APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT: PHONE NO: FAX NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS: APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT ADDRESS: CITY: STATE/ZIP: PROPERTY OWNER IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT/AGENT: PHONE NO: FAX NO: E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT CITY: STATE/ZIP: HAS YOUR PROJECT RECEIVED A PRELIMINARY REVIEW?  YES  NO □AIRPORT LAND USE COMM. DETERMINATION REFERRAL 100.0800.611.003 $ □REZONING – PLANNED DISTRICT 100.0800.611.001 $ □USE PERMIT – AMENDMENT 100.0400.449.001 $ □ANNEXATION 100.0800.611.001 $ □SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT – AMENDMENT 100.0400.449.001 $ □USE PERMIT – MAJOR 100.0400.449.001 $ □ APPEAL 100.0400.449.001 $ □SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT – MAJOR 100.0400.449.001 $ □USE PERMIT – MINOR 100.0400.449.001 $ □GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 100.0800.611.001 $ □SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT – MINOR 100.0400.449.001 $ □VARIANCE – MAJOR 100.0400.449.001 $ □MURAL PERMIT 100.0400.449.001 $ □SPECIFIC/MASTER PLAN 100.0800.611.003 $ □VARIANCE – MINOR 100.0400.449.001 $ □PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING 100.0800.611.003 $ □MINOR SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (4 OR FEWER LOTS) 100.0800.610.001 $ □ZONING AMENDMENT MAP OR TEXT 100.0800.611.001 $ □STAFF RESEARCH (MORE THAN 1 HOUR) 10023100.41153 $  MAJOR SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (5 OR MORE LOTS) 100.0800.610.001 $ □REZONING 100.0800.611.001 $ □LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OR MERGER 100.0800.610.001 $ □OTHER $ □OTHER $ COUNTY CEQA FILING FEE: CHECK PAYABLE TO MENDOCINO CO. $ MAJOR PERMIT DEPOSIT: $ FILING DATE: COUNTY CEQA (NEG DEC) FEE: CHECK PAYABLE TO MENDOCINO CO. $ MINOR PERMIT FEE: $ TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ COUNTY CEQA (EIR) FEE: CHECK PAYABLE TO MENDOCINO CO. $ TOTAL FEE: $ RECEIPT NUMBER: APPLICATION NUMBER(S): Recommendation: Prior to submitting an application, discuss your project with Staff to discover what fees (sewer, water, in-lieu park fees, traffic impact fees, etc.) may be required for your project. Also, ask about street tree requirements, required sidewalk repairs, drainage issues, storm water mitigation requirements, frontage improvements, etc. Community Development Department Planning Division 300 Seminary Ave., Ukiah CA 95482 Email: planning@cityofukiah.com Web: www.cityofukiah.com Phone: (707) 463 -6268 Fax: (707) 463-6204 Schramer 1070 N Oak 12 Angel Schramer 7073875469 angelschramer@gmail.com " "Ukiah CA/95482 4200 livestock permit Attachment 3 Page 77 of 585 Project Description Please attach a written project description including summary of work (both interior and exterior for construction and operation) and/or business proposed. The purpose of the project description is to assist Staff in understanding the project. The project description will also be included in the Staff Report required to review (and ultimately approve or deny) the planning permit. Providing complete information will help expedite the project review process and in determining what additional information, if any, related to the project and required environmental review is required. Environmental Review and Reports Please be aware that projects are required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Projects will be reviewed by Staff for compliance with CEQA and Staff will determine the appropriate CEQA document to prepare for the project (exemption, negative declaration, etc.). In order to make this determination, specific reports (traffic, arborist, soils, etc.) and or additional information may be required. Use Information Please provide the following information related to the use of the site and building: Description of Building & Site Parcel Size: Building Size: Number of Floors: Use of Building (check all that apply) Description Square Footage Number of Units/Suites □ Office (business/professional) □ Office (medical/dental) □ Retail □ Light Industrial □ Residential □ Other: Operating Characteristics Days and Hours of Operation: Number of Shifts: Days and Hours of Shifts: Number of Employees/Shift: Loading Facilities: □ Yes □ No Type/Vehicle Size: Deliveries: □ Yes □ No Type: Number (day/week/month): Time(s) of Day: Outdoor areas associated with use? (check all that apply) □ Yes □ No Sales area: □ Yes □ No Square Footage: Unloading of deliveries: □ Yes □ No Square Footage: Storage: □ Yes □ No Square Footage: Noise Generating Use? □ Yes □ No Description: To Be Completed by Staff General Plan Designation: Zoning District: Airport Land Use Designation: City’s Architectural & Historic Inventory: □ YES □ NO Age of Building: Demolition Policy: Hillside: □ YES □ NO Flood Designation FIRM Map: Flood Designation Floodway Map: Tree Policies General Plan Open Space Conservation □ NO □ YES GOAL/POLICY #: Community Forest Management Plan □ NO □ YES GOAL/POLICY #: Landscaping and Streetscape Design Guidelines □ NO □ YES GUIDELINE #: Commercial Development Design Guidelines □ NO □ YES GUIDELINE #: Tree Protection and Enhancement Policy □ NO □ YES NOTES: Tree Planting and Maintenance Policy □ NO □ YES NOTES: UCC: Street Tree Policy, Purpose and Intent □ NO □ YES NOTES: Other: Notes goat pen 1000 x Page 78 of 585 Submittal Requirements 1. Items marked (X) are required for a complete application unless their deletion is approved by staff. 2. Other information may be required at the discretion of staff in order to fully evaluate the project and/or to conduct required environmental review for the project. 3. Please review the application packet prior to submittal to the City. Application packets that do not include the required materials may not be accepted for processing or may be deemed “Incomplete.” Submittal Document Application Type LLA/VM GPA PRELIM REZ REZ-PD SDP Sub/TM UP VAR Project Description X X X X X X X X X Building Elevations (1) X X X X X Floor Plan X X X X X Grading and Drainage Plan and SUSMP (7) X X X Landscape Plan (2) X CONCEPT X X X Site Plan (3) X X X X X X X X Details – Architectural X Details – Fence X X X Details – Sign X X X Site Contours (4) X X X Street Sections X Tentative Map (6) X Preliminary Title Report X X X Colors & Materials Board X CONCEPT X X Number of Plan Sets – Initial Submittal (5) (1) Building Elevations. Drawing must include all elevations (front, rear, and sides) and identify materials and colors. One set of colored drawings is required. (2) Landscape Plan. Plan must show all proposed trees, shrubs, and ground covers. Location, size and species must be indicated. (3) Site Plan. Must be prepared to scale and include: a north arrow, all property lines, adjoining streets, creeks, ponds, drainage ditches, existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk, existing and proposed buildings (with square footage noted), parking spaces, all existing trees, existing and proposed fences, buildings on adjacent parcels, existing fire hydrants within 600- feet, access and utility easements (with widths), location an d width of all easements (access, drainage, utility, etc.) location of existing and proposed trash enclosures, and the percentage of average slope of the property. Site contours may also be required (see table above). (4) Site Contours. When required, site contours should be indicated on the site plan and grading plan. A separate site contour plan is not required. (5) Staff will determine the number of plans needed for the initial submittal. Once the application is complete, the number of plans sets required for the public hearing will be determined by staff. Plans are required to be provided prior to the hearing. (6) See Minor Subdivision Submittal Requirements or Major Subdivision Submittal Requirements handout for Tentative Map requirements. (7) SUSMP – Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan – Required unless specifically exempt (Consult with Public Works Staff) LLA – Lot Line Adjustment VM-Voluntary Merger Prelim – Preliminary Review REZ – Rezoning REZ-PD- Rezoning to Planned Development SDP – Site Development Permit TM – Tentative Map Sub- Subdivision GPA- General Plan Amendment VAR – Variance UP – Use Permit Page 79 of 585 I,______________________________________________ , owner authorize _____________________________ to act on my behalf for this project and I have read and agree with all of the above. (Application must be signed by owner). PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE I, _______________________________________________, am the owner /  authorized agent of the property for which the development is proposed. The above information and attached documents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I have read and agree with all of the above. I hereby authorize employees of the City of Ukiah, the City’s authorized agents, and persons with review or decision making authority for the project to enter upon the subject property, as n ecessary, to inspect the premises, post notices, and process this application. I understand that conditions of approval may be placed on my project by the city of Ukiah and it is my responsibility to fully understand the conditions and ask questions about them before action is taken on my planning permit.  OWNER / AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT As part of this application, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Ukiah, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions or Council from any claim, action or proceeding brought against any of the foregoing n individuals or entities, the purpose of which is to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval of the application or related decision, or the adoption or certification of any environmental documents or negative declaration which relates to its approval. This indemnification shall include, but is not limited to, all damages, costs, expenses, attorney fees or expert witness fees that may be awarded to the prevailing party arising out of it or in connection with the approval of the application or related decision, whether or not there is concurrent, passive, or active negligence on the part of the City, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions of Council. If for any reason, any portion of this indemnification agreement is held to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The City of Ukiah shall have the right to appear and defend its interests in any action through its City Attorney or outside counsel. The applicant shall not be required to reimburse the City for attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney of the City’s outside counsel if the City chooses to appear and defend itself in the litigation. I have read and agree to all of the above.  PROPERTY OWNER / AUTHORIZED AGENT (PLEASE PRINT NAME)  PROPERTY OWNER / AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE (SIGNATURE) Revised 08/19/2019 Angel Schramer City of Ukiah Angel Schramer 10/30/2020 Angel Schramer 10/30/2020 10/30/2020 Page 80 of 585 Page 81 of 585 SAMPLE PLOT PLAN 100' r - - - - -r -----, ------------ ·1· ---- --------, ( · - - - -"' . -..... J. ��·--'.'.'��· -....... -... - .. -... -- .. -. ' I b �5•-. (E) Garage "' N (I) E � 1-111◄---·25•·---+1 (E} Single Family Residence ,·----25•·---)l'M � Applicant's Name 123 Road, Ukiah APN: 000-000-00-00 Road Name 1 i A N X" = Y' "C ro 0 Cl'.'. Page 82 of 585 Schramer Livestock Permit Two goats will be housed within a 1000sq ft pen on the back, south western side of the 16,000sq ft property. The animals will be used as companion animals (not of value as livestock) for the remainder of thier lives. The pen is deep cleaned once a week and maintained daily. Their bedding and manure is cleaned up thoroughly and put into a receptical for disposal. The animals water is changed every other day or as deemed neccesssary, they are fed alfalfa daily and get lots of grains and vegetable scraps, on top of other healthy treats. The animals are very quiet and calm animals as they are weathered, debudded and elderly. The primary caregiver of the animals is myself (Angel Schramer) but the animals are cared for as a family; my children are invloved with 4H for homeschooling purposes and FFA throught the Ukiah Highschool. As the property owners adjustments as needed to our property to increase value and maintain the health and safety of our animals. The animals do not create a nuisance, they are quiet, they do not jump, they are non-aggressive, they do not smell, are regularly wormed and vaccinated, and help deter vermin and obnoxious plant species from encroaching onto our property and clear vegetation that could potentially create fire hazards. They are not visible to any neighbors as we have continuously progressed our fencing, we use fly traps commonly used in livestock pens and change them out once a month. Our property does not create run off into anyones yards as the slight decline would bring runoff into my own yard if anything. There is nothing for them to climb on, and they are confined to their own area which provides open roaming area and a suitable covered shelter. Page 83 of 585 Page 84 of 585 Page 85 of 585 ORDINANCE NO. 1206 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING DIVISION 5, CHAPTER 2 OF THE CITY CODE TO DESIGNATE THE ENTITY AUTHORIZED TO MAKE DETERMINATIONS ON LIVESTOCK PERMITS. The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows: SECTION ONE. Division 5, Chapter 2 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows unchanged text is omitted and is shown by "* * *"): 4200 KEEPING LIVESTOCK WITHIN CITY LIMITS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMIT It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to keep, harbor or maintain, or cause, permit or suffer to be kept, harbored or maintained within the corporate limits of the City any cow, bull, calf, horse, mule, jennie, jack, burro, sheep, goat, swine or any other livestock without then and there having a valid permit in writing issued by the Zoning Administrator of the City under the provisions of the Chapter. 4201 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Any person, firm or corporation required to have a permit under the provisions of this Chapter shall make application for the same to the Zoning Administrator of the City. Such application shall be in writing and signed by the applicant and shall contain the following: A. The name and address of the applicant. B. The type and number of such animals. C. The place where such animals are intended to be kept. D. The length of time such applicant intends to keep such animals at such place. E. Such other information as may be required by the Zoning Administrator for the enforcement of the provisions of this Chapter. 4202 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO INVESTIGATE CONDITIONS; STANDARDS Upon receipt of an application for a permit required under this Chapter the Zoning Administrator shall make an investigation to determine if the keeping of such animals as requested in the application would create or continue any of the following conditions: A. Create a hazard to public health or safety; or, 1 Attachment 4 Page 86 of 585 B. Constitute a public or private nuisance; or, C. Otherwise seriously and injuriously affect living conditions or property values in adjacent or neighboring properties 4203 ISSUANCE OF PERMIT; FORM; CONDITIONS If the Zoning Administrator finds that none of the conditions set forth in §4202 are present, or would be present in the event the application were granted, it shall issue to the applicant the permit requested. The permit may be unconditional or may contain such conditions as are deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator. The permit shall be in such form as prescribed by the Zoning Administrator and shall be signed by an authorized member thereof. It shall be nontransferable and shall be valid only for the location stated in the permit. 4204 DURATION OF PERMIT; TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION; NOTICE TO PERMITTEE The permit shall continue until modified or terminated, and the same way be modified or terminated at any time whenever in the opinion of the Zoning Administrator the circumstances have changed so as to cause any of the conditions set forth in §4202 to be present. At least ten (10) day's notice in writing shall be given the permittee prior to any modification or termination becoming effective. Placing such notice in the regular U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the permittee at the address appearing on the application shall constitute such notice. Permittee shall at all times keep the Zoning Administrator informed of any change in his address, and in the event of notification of such change such notice shall be given to permittee at such changed address rather than the address appearing in the application. 4205 REFUSAL TO ISSUE PERMIT If the Zoning Administrator finds that any one or more of the conditions set forth in §4202 are present, or would be present in the event the application were granted, it shall refuse to issue the permit requested, and shall notify the applicant of such action and the reason therefor. 4206 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS In any case where an applicant for a permit, a permittee, or any other interested person is dissatisfied with any determination of the Zoning Administrator relative to the presence or absence of any of the conditions mentioned in section 4202 of this code, or is aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator with respect to the issuance, modification or termination or refusal to issue, modify or terminate any permit required by this chapter, such person may apply for a hearing before the Hearing Officer of the City. Such hearing shall be held within fifteen (15) days from the date of filing the application for hearing, unless continued at the request of the appellant. Notice of the time and place of hearing shall be given the appellant, and he shall be entitled to appear in person or by counsel and present evidence. In the event such a hearing is requested by other 2 Page 87 of 585 than an applicant or permittee, any applicant or permittee affected thereby shall be given the same notice and shall have the same rights to appear and present evidence as the person requesting the hearing. The Hearing Officer shall hear and consider evidence presented at such hearing, and shall decide the issue based upon the evidence presented. A decision must be rendered in writing by such Hearing Officer within ten (10) days from the date of hearing, and a copy of any such decision shall be furnished to the person requesting the hearing, and affected applicant or permittee, and any other interested person requesting the same. The decision may reverse, affirm or modify any action of the Zoning Administrator, and may provide such other determination as the Hearing Officer may deem appropriate. SECTION TWO. A new Section 4211 shall be added to Chapter 2 in Division 5 of the Ukiah City Code and shall read as follows: 4211 DEFINITIONS Unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meanings when those terms are used in this Chapter. HEARING OFFICER. An individual appointed by the City Council to hear and decide appeals of certain decisions made by City officials and entities, as defined further in Section 23 of this Code. SECTION THREE. 1.Publication: Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, this Ordinance shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ukiah. In lieu of publishing the full text of the Ordinance, the City may publish a summary of the Ordinance once 5 days prior to its adoption and again within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. 3.Effective Date: The ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Introduced by title only on September 2, 2020, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mulheren, Brown, Scalmanini, Orozco, and Mayor Crane NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Adopted on September 16, 2020, by the following roll call vote: 3 Page 88 of 585 A`/ES: Counoi|nnennberoMu|heren. Brovvn, Soa|nnanini. Orozco, and Mayor Crane NOBS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Dougla,s F. Crane, Mayor ATTEST: Page 89 of 585 1 Mireya Turner From:Leslie H. Smyth <lesliehyattsmyth@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, December 6, 2020 11:55 AM To:Mireya Turner Subject:Schramer goats [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I live at 154 Gibson St. and thus received notice about Angel Schramer’s application for two resident goats. Since I am unable to attend the hearing on Dec. 21, I wanted those concerned to know I have no objection to two goats moving in at 1070 N Oak. Leslie H Smyth Sent from my iPhone Attachment 5 Page 90 of 585 1 Mireya Turner From:Charlene Light <charlenelight@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, December 21, 2020 1:43 PM To:Meeting [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Afternoon, I have a comment to make regarding the goats on Oak Street. I believe that for city residents to have livestock residing on their property they should receive permission from the neighbors who will be affected. There should also be a minimum distance required from the neighbor's property line. The city should also revisit what they consider as livestock vrs pets. Charlene Light Ukiah resident Public Correspondence 12/21/2020 Page 91 of 585 1 Mireya Turner From:roody@pacific.net Sent:Monday, December 21, 2020 1:58 PM To:Mireya Turner Subject:comments on livestock permit [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please enter these comments into the record of the hearing for 1070 N. Oak St. Thank you. The photos were sent earlier today to Ms. Turner. Mr. and Mrs. Schramer have been illegally keeping goats at 1070 N. Oak Street for six months, with the City's permission. I have lived at 1060 N. Oak St. since June 1999. Anyone thinking of living in or buying residential property in Ukiah needs to know that the City can and will allow your neighbors to keep livestock. The Schramer family or their ancestors have lived next door to me for 21 years. Ukiah municipal code section 4202 states that the zoning administrator shall make an investigation. Has this already happened? Please post the report of such an investigation. Do the Schramers follow local laws for animal care? Is their dog properly licensed and vaccinated? Did someone inspect my yard when I was not home? Was the investigation more thorough than the code enforcement visit in July that left logs next to my six‐foot fence that the goats could scale? (photo attached) Does the report include the history of police and fire calls to 1070 N. Oak St? In spite of the fact that the goats at 1070 N. Oak Street present a private nuisance, a possible hazard to my and my pets' health and safety, and lower my property value, I support the issuance of this permit with some conditions. One is that all animals kept at 1070 N. Oak Street be treated humanely, kept warm, safe, and dry. Second is the goats are to be in an enclosure that keeps them out of my dogs' sight and out of my yard. In June, the goats were put in a pen in sight of my dogs. This excited my dogs and still does. The goats want to engage my dogs. I covered most of the fence with very cheap panels so my dogs could relax. This material will likely not last one winter. It is the owners' job to enclose their goats properly. In our community property state, the goats belong to Mr. Schramer and Mrs. Schramer. I have seen Mr. Schramer punch his dog in the face. I did report this to the police, and I was told I would need video to make a case. I have heard the dog being hit and screamed at many times in the last eight years. I have heard it growl back at Mr. Schramer. This is an unsafe situation. Unlike Cloverdale, Santa Rosa, and Petaluma, Ukiah does not have standards of humane and healthy animal care. A pet needs a warm place to live, sheltered from cold and rain. Mr. and Mrs. Schramer's dog does not have this. This short‐haired dog sleeps on a pile of fabric in the cold. Please see photo taken Dec 10 at 7:15 a.m. It was 33 degrees. Please see photo of the dog after days of rain, taken December 13. I saw a professional dog‐walker offer the Schramers a dog bed. It was in her hands, and they said no. Fifteen years ago, I offered them a dog house and they said no. Page 92 of 585 2 The goats smell bad and attract biting flies. This is a lesser nuisance than other nuisances from 1070 N. Oak Street. The machine or auto shop there works almost every night. The machines make noise. The loud vehicles intermittently make even more noise. But the worst nuisance is Mr. Schramer screaming at his family, calling them names and using the F word as much as possible. This home has a history of police calls and screaming fights. Mr. and Mrs. Schramer have already lowered my property value. I will be obligated to inform any potential buyer that they will be living next to an auto or machine shop that runs day and night, they will hear adults screaming the F word at children, pets, and each other. They will smell goats, have more flies, and potentially be exposed to disease due to runoff. Because of this I will not build an ADU (adjunct dwelling unit.) My comfort in my warm bed is always marred by the knowledge that poor Buddy, the dog next door is sleeping in the cold and rain. The goats are the lesser nuisance of all these conditions. I support the livestock permit with the conditions that all animals at 1070 N. Oak Street are kept safe, healthy, warm, and dry. Page 93 of 585 Page 94 of 585 Page 95 of 585 Page 96 of 585 ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: roody@pacific.net <roody@pacific.net> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 7:38 AM To: Kristine Lawler <klawler@cityofukiah.com> Subject: Notice of Appeal [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ruth Van Antwerp 1060 N. Oak St. Ukiah CA 95482 roody@pacific.net City of Ukiah Ukiah CA 95482 This is a Notice of Appeal requesting an appeal hearing of the Zoning Administrator's decision, made on December 21, 2020, which approved a livestock permit at 1070 N. Oak Street with no conditions. As the person living closest to the goats (much closer than their owners) at 1060 N. Oak Street, I asked for two conditions to be placed on the permit. The first is that the goat owners keep the goats out of sight with appropriate fencing. The second is that all pets at 1070 N. Oak Street be treated humanely. Neither condition exists at this time. The investigation of the goats was incomplete and incorrect. It appears from the photo of the goats' pen shown at the hearing that the investigator was not close to the goats or near the fence to see that it allows for my pets and I to see the goats. Attachment 1 of the staff report states, "the goats are not visible from outside the project parcel." The report stated that there was no odor. The odor depends on the wind. My front and back yard are one inch from the goats. The distance in the photo is many feet. I often smell their foul odor. The investigation reported that the goats are vaccinated. What was the proof of vaccination and against which diseases? Water runoff was also mentioned. I discussed runoff with a hydrologist and she said a report from her would say that water runs downhill, so hiring her was not necessary. The staff report reads, "Both fences appear to be in sound condition." The investigator did not inspect the fence that allows my dogs to stare at the goats and the goats to challenge my dogs to play or fight. The dogs and goats can see each other between every vertical board on the southern fence. The investigator did not see my cheap quick fix to block most of the line of vision on the south fence, which will not last a winter. The investigator did not see the fabric behind the west fence placed by the goat owners, which may last only a season also. The investigator did not see the places where my dogs watch the goats. I commented at the hearing that it is the livestock owners' responsibility to properly enclose their animals. The fence is held together with nails, not screws, and animals can easily loosen the boards on the twelve‐year‐old south fence. In spite of the facts that the goats are a nuisance and they lower my property value, I support the permit with conditions. Since I have seen and heard Mr. Schramer strike and scream at his dog for eight years, I Attachment 3 Page 97 of 585 am concerned for the health and safety of the goats and the dog. I fear that the goats could be hit by Mr. Schramer. It is good that the goats have a warm and dry place to lie down, and Ukiah code should require it for the dog as well. I documented in my hearing comments the lack of shelter for the Schramer's dog. Why does Ukiah code not protect dogs from neglect? Please do a kindness for this dog and require a warm and dry place for him also. I support the permit with two conditions. I am asking that the Hearing Officer place these two conditions on the permit. One is that the livestock is properly enclosed out of sight of the neighbors. Two is that all animals kept at 1070 N. Oak Street are kept safe, warm, and dry. Please do a thorough investigation and look at the fence. Attached are 4 photos. I can be reached at 707‐472‐7514 to schedule a site visit. Page 98 of 585 From: Charlene Light <charlenelight@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 10:44 AM To: Kristine Lawler <klawler@cityofukiah.com>; Charlene Light <charlenelight@gmail.com> Subject: appeal of livestock permit issued on Dec. 21st, 2020 [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Charlene Light 170 Cleveland Lane, Apt. 321 Ukiah, CA 95482 charlenelight@gmail.com January 4, 2021 To: The City of Ukiah Ukiah, CA 95482 I wish to appeal your decision made on December 21, 2020, which issues a permit for the Schramer family at 1070 N. Oak Street to keep two elderly goats on their property, until you have thoroughly checked out and documented your findings on both properties involved. Ms. Van Antwerp, the neighbor at 1060 N. Oak Street, has stated certain conditions whereby she will accept the permit; but these conditions have not all been met. She stated that there must be a sound fence between the two properties and no visibility of the goats from her property, among other conditions such as that the goats and all animals on the Schramer property be treated humanely. The city needs to not only look at the Schramer's property, but needs to visit Ms. Van Antwerp's property and note their findings. The city believes that there is a sound fence between the two properties. With Ms. Van Antwerp's permission, I visited her property and found the fence not to be sound and also visibility of the goats through two different slots in the fence. I could see the goats through these spaces, as could Ms. Van Antwerp's dogs, which is one of Ms. Van Antwerp's concerns. I realize addressing these concerns will take some time; but, since I believe neighbors should have input on how the actions of their neighbors affect the value of their property and the peace and quality of their lives, then it should be your duty to take the neighbor's concerns into consideration before issuing livestock permits. I want what is best for the goats, but I do believe that permission for livestock permits within city limits should be issued only after considering and addressing the concerns of the neighbors. I am asking you to appeal your decision until the valid concerns of Ms. Van Antwerp are met. Thank you very much. Charlene Light, Ukiah resident Page 99 of 585 Attachment 4 Page 100 of 585 Page 101 of 585 Page 102 of 585 Page 103 of 585 Page 104 of 585 Page 105 of 585 Page 106 of 585 Page 107 of 585 Page 108 of 585 Page 109 of 585 Page 110 of 585 Page 111 of 585 Page 112 of 585 Page 113 of 585 Page 114 of 585 Page 115 of 585 Page 116 of 585 Page 117 of 585 Page 118 of 585 Page 119 of 585 Page 120 of 585 Page 121 of 585 Page 122 of 585 Page 123 of 585 Page 124 of 585 Page 125 of 585 Page 126 of 585 Page 127 of 585 Page 128 of 585 Page 129 of 585 Page 130 of 585 Page 131 of 585 Page 132 of 585 Page 133 of 585 Page 134 of 585 Page 135 of 585 Page 136 of 585 Page 137 of 585 Page 138 of 585 Page 139 of 585 Page 140 of 585 Page 141 of 585 Page 142 of 585 Page 143 of 585 Page 144 of 585 Page 145 of 585 Page 146 of 585 Page 147 of 585 Page 148 of 585 ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: roody@pacific.net <roody@pacific.net> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 9:56 AM To: Kristine Lawler <klawler@cityofukiah.com> Subject: notice of appeal [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. February 8, 2021 Ruth Van Antwerp 1060 N. Oak Street Ukiah CA 95482 707‐472‐7514 Kristine Lawler, City Clerk City of Ukiah Ukiah CA 95482 Dear Ms. Lawler: This is my Notice of Appeal of the decision dated January 29, 2021, by Matthew J. Finnegan, Hearing Officer, regarding the livestock permit at 1070 N. Oak Street. Mr. Finnegan referred to the “lack of a visual barrier” not being a reason to change the decision of the Zoning Admnistrator. The City has twice stated that the “goats cannot be seen from any other parcel.” The City also claims that said fence “appears to be sound.” The evidence provided by the city shows one side of the fence from a distance of 70 feet, more or less. I request that the City amend its investigation and findings based on an inspection of the fence from both sides at a close distance. My property has been available for a site inspection since June 29, 2020, the day the goats arrived without a permit. I continue to ask that the permit be granted with two conditions: the goats cannot be seen from my property, and that all pets at 1070 N. Oak St. be provided with adequate shelter. Sincerely, Ruth Van Antwerp Attachment 5 Page 149 of 585 CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Ukiah Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 February 18, 2021 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following public hearing of the City Council of the City of Ukiah on February 17, 2021, which was duly noticed in the Ukiah Daily Journal for March 26, 2016, was continued to Wednesday, March 3, 2021, at 6:15 p.m.: Consideration of Appeal of the Hearing Officer's Approval of Livestock Permit to Keep Two Male Goats at 1070 North Oak Street; Appellant is Ruth Van Antwerp. I, Kristine Lawler, City Clerk, do hereby swear and affirm that the above “Notice of Continuance of Public Hearing” was duly posted on the bulletin board outside of City Hall and the Council Chambers on February 18, 2021. ATTACHMENT 6 Page 150 of 585 Page 151 of 585 1 Kristine Lawler Subject:FW: statement to council Attachments:20200725_194310.jpg; 20210303_005024_418232252774101.mp4 -------- Original message -------- From: roody@pacific.net Date: 3/2/21 11:20 PM (GMT-07:00) To: roody@pacific.net Subject: statement to council March 2, 2021 Ruth Van Antwerp Ukiah CA Ukiah City Council Ukiah CA Dear Councilmember: I am appealing the lack of two conditions which I requested be applied to the livestock permit granted to 1070 N. Oak Street. One is that the goats cannot be seen by me or my pets. Two is that all animals at 1070 N. Oak street have sufficient shelter, which the goats have, but the dog does not. On June 29, 2020, two goats arrived at 1070 N. Oak Street. Twenty-one days later, on July 20, 2020 their owner applied for a livestock permit from the City of Ukiah. On July 25, 2020, I realized that the goats could easily jump my 6-foot deer and rabbit fence. I cancelled my appointments in order to stay home and guard my yard. Both Code Enforcement and Officer Freeman of the Ukiah police had previously seen the wood pile that the goats climbed, and they took no action. Until I sent this photo to the City (see attachment 1) the woodpile remained. On September 2, 2020, the City Council amended the Livestock Permit Ordinance to enable the Zoning Administrator to grant a permit. The last paragraph of the Agenda Summary Report reads, “These amendments to the Livestock Ordinance are intended to clarify the process for permitting livestock. However, Staff intends to conduct a more comprehensive review of the livestock and related ordinances and propose more comprehensive amendments as time allows.” (italics are mine) Six months later, this appeal of the Hearing Officer’s decision presents an opportunity for the Council to make “time allow.” I request that the Council clarify who is responsible to properly enclose livestock, Page 152 of 585 2 their owners, or the neighbors with shared fences. Ukiah’s current code has no standards of care for livestock. The Staff Report on page 73 of your packet remains in error, referring to the goats, “they are not visible from outside the Project Parcel.” Attachment 2, video taken February 12 shows my dog enjoying the sight of the goats. “Both fences appear to be in sound condition.” The south fence is not sound and has not been inspected by the City to my knowledge. After a careful reading of Attachment 2 of the Staff Report, page 118 of your packet, I realized that the goats not being visible from neighboring parcels was already a condition of the livestock permit, though the goats can be seen from my yard. A more important action that the Council can take is to begin protecting dogs in Ukiah. The municipal code does not require shelter for a dog unless it is in a licensed kennel. Ukiah Code 4161 Division 5, 4161, D 14 reads, “Licensees shall provide proper shelter and protection from the weather at all times.” There is no similar rule for dogs not in a licensed kennel. I request that the City Council place the condition on the livestock permit that all animals kept at 1070 N. Oak Street have proper shelter and protection from the weather. On pages 96 and 97 of the packet, you can see living conditions of the dog at 1070 N. Oak St. This is where I see him when I walk up my driveway regardless of cold, rain, wind, and snow. The Council can make Ukiah better by protecting domestic animals. Require that dogs have sufficient shelter that protects them from weather. Placing this condition on this livestock permit will be a step towards improving animals' lives in Ukiah. Fayetteville, Arkansas, has ordinances that protect animals. Section 92.02 A reads, “No owner shall fail to provide his animals with sufficient food and water; shelter which provides protection from the weather including four sides with opening, roof, and floor. Fayetteville also has detailed provisions for livestock in section 164.04. These may provide examples. Anyone considering moving to a residential zone in Ukiah needs to be aware that the City can and will allow livestock next to your home. Ruth Van Antwerp Page 153 of 585 1 Kristine Lawler Subject:11a Correspondence Received - Angel Schramer From: Angel Schramer <angelschramer@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 2:47 PM To: Kristine Lawler <klawler@cityofukiah.com> Subject: Re: City council tonight 3/3/21 [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please add this into the meeting for tonight; In response to Ruth Van Antwerps' recent letter, as she keeps stating that the fence is not sound on the south end of my back yard where my goats are housed. How much will she be paying to fix the aspects of my fencing that her grape vines and ivy ruined? Am I responsible for someone else causing damage to my property? Is Ruth in charge of my life and the comings and goings of my family on my property, including the words we may use? Has Ruth not understood the many times we have been in these meetings that my permit for my GOATS has nothing to do with any other animal on my property? Ruth has been allowed on a public platform to attempt to impress the public with her "knowledge" of my husband and his previous family member/members and use it years later to create issues for myself; whom she does not know, will not have a face to face conversation with and has apparently made her new "project'. Her assumptions are just that, assumptions. She does not know myself, how I operate, what my morals are, my standards of care for my family or animals and has vehemently harassed me since June of 2020. Including posting my address with complete lies on Facebook, contacting UDJ for a very one sided, slanderous article that included my name and address and has stopped at nothing to attempt to get her way. What I truly find disconcerting is that she claims to have lived on her property for 20 years, my husband 13 years, and his dog, Buddy, for 7 years and lo and behold she uses her apparent care for the dog as means to get her way with a permit for my goats 7 years into his (Buddy the dogs’) life as a primarily outdoor dog. I have lived here on this property less than 3 years, a half year spent on bed rest, was gone 6 months of that time due to my 16 month old son being born with a rare birth defect, to finally come home in April during the Covid Pandemic and then have to deal with the constant harassment of a neighbor I've never once had a conversation with. If Ruth Van Antwerp is worried for the welfare of canines in Ukiah, why doesn't she use her relentless letter writing and petition for a new ordinance instead of trying to enforce her own code upon myself within a separate ordinance? Why waste everyone else's time and energy, and do something that apparently makes a difference for the community, not just herself. Or maybe she can just move to Petaluma, Cloverdale, Santa Rosa, Windsor or FAYETTVILLE, ARKANSAS since Ukiah just doesn't seem to fit the bill for her? Aside from all of that, let's look at the fencing that Ruth is speaking of shall we? You will see that indeed there are gaps in fencing that Ruth is showing in her video, you will also see that she removed the board that kept her dogs very small opportunity at viewing the goats just so that she could sit with her dog and attempt to entice the dog to react to my goats playing with eachother in their enclosure. . . as you will also see, the only gaps created have come from her ivy literally pushing large vines between the fence that my husband built a number of years ago. In past instances if you look back you will see that Ruth has insisted that my goats try to entice her dog, which obviously they are not even aware of the dog. Ruth on the other hand is setting up an opportunity for her dog to see my goats, attempt to entice her own "predatory animal" as she has stated in the past and claim that it is a fencing issue, rather than possibly an owner issue. I cannot walk my own property without her dog growling nastily and barking at myself on a regular basis. BUT ENOUGH ABOUT THE DOGS RIGHT? My goats are fine, and if Ruth wants to fix what she broke then she by all means, can and should. Placing a condition on a livestock permit that has nothing to do with livestock is outrageous, a waste of time, energy and money and quite frankly is asinine. Ruth stated at the last appeal hearing that she doesn’t find the goats to be a nuisance. Why not leave it at that? Page 154 of 585 2 Page 155 of 585 3 Page 156 of 585 4 Page 157 of 585 5 Page 158 of 585 6 Page 159 of 585 7 Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 3, 2021, at 2:08 PM, Angel Schramer <angelschramer@gmail.com> wrote: Page 160 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 12.a. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2020-352 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Receive Status Report and Consider Any Action or Direction Related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Emergency Including Operational Preparedness and Response; Continuity of City Operations and Services; Community and Business Impacts; and Any Other Related Matters. DEPARTMENT: City Manager / Admin PREPARED BY: Tami Bartolomei, Office of Emergency Management Coordinator PRESENTER: Tami Bartolomei, Office of Emergency Management Coordinator ATTACHMENTS: None Summary: The City Council will receive a status report and consider any action or direction related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Emergency including operational preparedness and response; continuity of City operations and services; community and business impacts; and any other related matters. Background: On March 4, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency in California in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The County of Mendocino declared a State of Emergency related to the COVID-19 on March 4, 2020. On March 17, 2020, the City Manager, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, declared the existence of a local emergency. On March 18, 2020, City Council approved a Resolution ratifying the proclamation declaring the existence of a local emergency. Since the onset of the emergency, the City of Ukiah has worked to respond to the public health and safety needs of the community in cooperation with the County of Mendocino and other partners. The local response for public health is lead regionally by the County of Mendocino and the County's Public Health Officer. In addition, the City of Ukiah has worked to maintain the continuity of public services including public safety, water, sewer, electric, airport, public works, and other essential activities. Discussion: As the coronavirus “COVID-19” continues to evolve, the City of Ukiah continues to monitor the situation and respond to emerging needs of the community. The City is in continued contact with local and state agencies, as well as community partners, hospitals, schools, and neighboring cities to ensure we have the most updated information pertaining to COVID-19 and are coordinating efforts. Reports and/or information from the City of Ukiah's Emergency Operation Center (EOC) will include: * Emergency Operation Center (EOC) Status * COVID-19 Case Updates * Public Information Officer * Medical Services * School/Education Page 161 of 585 Page 2 of 2 * Public Safety (Police/Fire/EMS) * Shelter in Place Monitoring and Compliance * Community Service Groups * Homeless Response * Business Impacts/Services * Public Infrastructure/Construction Status * City Finance * Recovery Efforts and Planning * Other Related matters Staff will provide a status report to City Council and will seek direction or action on operational preparedness and response; continuity of City operations and services; community and business impacts; and any other related matters. Go to the City's website (www.cityofukiah.com) for direct access to information related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) emergency including local updates, City Services, Community/Resident Information, and Business Resources. Recommended Action: Receive status report and consider any action or direction related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Emergency including operational preparedness and response; continuity of City operations and services; community and business impacts; and any other related matters. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Page 162 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 12.b. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-733 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Discussion and Possible Approval of a Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. DEPARTMENT: Community Development PREPARED BY: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director PRESENTER: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2-17-21 Agenda Summary Report 2. UKGP_Draft-Vision-Statements_2020 3. Recommended Vision Statement- 2040 General Plan Summary: Council will discuss and possibly approve a Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. Background: On February 17, 2021, Council considered and discussed four draft Vision Statements for the 2040 General Plan. See Attachment 1 for a copy of the February 17, 2021, Agenda Summary Report and Attachment 2 for the four draft Vision Statements. Although Councilmembers generally concurred on priorities related to the Vision Statement, there was direction for a revision on final wording. By consensus vote, Council directed Staff to meet with Vice Mayor Brown and Councilmember Rodin to discuss and possibly make a recommendation to the Council at the March 3, 2021, meeting on a final modified Vision Statement. Discussion: Staff met with Vice Mayor Brown and Councilmember Rodin and discussed wording for the Vision Statements. Vision Statement #4 was selected by both Councilmembers, with the modification of adding the word "safe" to reflect the City's focus on community safety and eliminating two redundant phrases- the "that is" and "focus and" in the first sentence. The final modified Vision Statement would read: "The City of Ukiah is a diverse, family-oriented, and friendly community connected to the beautiful, surrounding natural open space areas that give the community its unique sense of place. Ukiah is a safe and resilient community that is fiscally responsible, environmentally conscious, and inclusive. The city offers a great place for people of all ages, incomes, and ethnicities to live, work, and visit." This modified Vision Statement #4 is included as Attachment 3. Staff recommends Council approve the modified Vision Statement #4 as the Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. Recommended Action: Approve the modified Vision Statement #4 as the City's Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A Page 163 of 585 Page 2 of 2 FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: N/A Page 164 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 12.d. MEETING DATE/TIME: 2/17/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-714 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Discussion and Possible Approval of a Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan DEPARTMENT:Community Development PREPARED BY:Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director PRESENTER: Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1.UKGP_2019-Community-Engagement-Summary_2020 2.UKGP_Draft-Vision-Statements_2020 3.UKGP_ECTW_Final_web_pt1 (1-41) 4.UKGP_ECTW_Final_web_pt2 (42-93) Summary: Council will discuss and possibly approve a Vision Statement for the 2040 General Plan. Background: The City initiated the update to its General Plan through a joint workshop of the City Council and Planning Commission on May 14, 2019. Since that time, City Staff and the City's advanced planning specialists, Mintier Harnish, have collected a significant amount of input and feedback from the public via community engagement events, workshops, comments emailed to Staff, and from comments submitted on the City's General Plan website, ukiah2040.com. On January 14, 2020, summaries of this input (Attachment 1) were posted on the website, as well as draft General Plan Vision Statements (Attachment 2). Staff also sent an e-blast in both English and Spanish to the City's General Plan contact list notifying recipients of the posting of these materials. In March 2020, Staff and the City's advanced planning specialists completed the Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook (due to file size, Attachment 3 contains pages 1-41 and Attachment 4 contains pages 42- 93). This Workbook, plus community input received thus far, a land use alternatives workshop scheduled for March 31, 2020, and the Vision Statement, were to serve as the basis for preparation of the General Plan document itself. Unfortunately, due to the pandemic the land use alternatives workshop was put on hold. After collecting input and suggestions from the City's Equity and Diversity Ad Hoc Committee and reviewing best practices for the virtual hosting of major community engagement events, Staff rescheduled this land use alternatives workshop as a virtual workshop for December 7 and 8, 2020. Approximately 40-50 people total attended the workshop, which was held on two separate evenings. With the land use alternatives workshop now completed, the City is back on schedule for preparation and completion of the 2040 General Plan. Discussion: To proceed, Staff is requesting Council discuss and possibly approve one of the four draft Vision Statements, with any modifications desired, which will serve as a basis for the 2040 General Plan preparation effort. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 165 of 585 Page 2 of 2 The General Plan Vision Statement and guiding principles are intended to reflect what community members value most about Ukiah and the shared aspirations of what they envision their community being in the future. The Vision Statement should be inspirational and establish key values for the General Plan's guiding principles, goals, policies, and implementation measures. Great care was given to ensure that no singular stakeholder group or myopic point overrode any four of the community drafted vision statements. The guiding principles will provide an opportunity for more specific direction such as fundamental rules or doctrine that the City will use to inform General Plan goals, policies, and implementation measures. Recommended Action: Discuss and possibly approve one of four Vision Statements for the 2040 General Plan. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Mintier-Harnish, Advanced Planning Specialists Page 166 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 1 of 39 The following provides a summary of community input received at the first two General Plan events held in 2019 and input provided on the General Plan Update website (ukiah2040.com). Community Workshop #1: Topic: Existing Conditions and Trends, Identification of Issues and Opportunities, and Visioning Location: Ukiah Valley Conference Center, Downtown Ukiah Attendance: 75 community participants The City hosted the first community workshop on the General Plan Update on September 24, 2019, at the Ukiah Valley Conference Center in Downtown Ukiah. The Workshop lasted approximately two hours and was attended by over 75 community members. The focus of Community Workshop #1 was to familiarize the community with the Update process, introduce the City Planning team and the Advanced Planning Specialists team assisting City staff through the process, as well as gather initial feedback that would inform the upcoming phases of the Update. Workshop #1 also included a series of interactive stations pertaining to Existing Conditions and Trends, Identification of Issues and Opportunities, and Visioning. The stations were created to allow community members regardless of language and age to participate and provide feedback for the future of Ukiah. Below is an overview of the stations and a record of the public comments and feedback. All stations also included informational boards and workshops translated into Spanish. Station #1 – Existing Conditions and Trends Overview Station #1 included posters that provided an overview of the General Plan process, key milestones, and opportunities to become involved. Station #1 also had a series of informational boards that highlighted the key findings from the Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook (slated for release in early 2020). Boards included an overview of existing community information in a graphical format organized around each Workbook chapter. Community members were able to read the boards and ask questions of City staff and members of the Advanced Planning Specialists team in an open house style format. This approach allowed for free-flowing dialogue with community members and spurred further discussion about community expectations for the General Plan. Attachment 1 Page 167 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 2 of 39 Page 168 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 3 of 39 Station #2 – Identification of Issues and Opportunities Station #2 included an exercise focused on the identification of issues and opportunities that the General Plan Update should address. Participants were asked to use a series of sticky notes to write down issues and opportunities that are important to them. At each of the tables for Station #2, the City also provided a table map of Ukiah and its boundaries, and asked community members to mark on the map specific areas that need addressing in the update or areas that the City should capitalize on and maintain over the next 20 years. The following pages provide a list of all issues and opportunities provided at Community Workshop #1. There is no ranking or order to these ideas. These items are presented as written, without editing, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the City. Any comments that contained profanities were removed. Page 169 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 4 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y Transportation and Parking Speed bumps please on streets with 25 mph limit. X Traffic, Mill Street is too narrow for 2 way traffic. X Plan for a westside roadway west of Dora Street. X Roads on E/S Calpella. X Need speed bump on Gibson St, kids race up and down to high school. X Traffic too fast up Grove Ave. X Lack of bike racks throughout city. X Incomplete sidewalks - west-side near Todd Grove Park, i.e.. Live Oak ave. X Lack of bike and walk corridors that are safe & complete. Need more bike lanes and functional sidewalks. X Lack of commuter bike lanes connecting N-S/E-W. X State Street very bike-unfriendly. X More bike paths so everyone is only 1 to 3 blocks from one. X Bike paths separated from streets. X Please add bike lane along Talmage Road. X Traffic involved with building up housing in areas - How could all the farm worker condos ever been allowed on Brust St., on that rather inaccessible road? X Please make the permissive left turn at the N> Orchard Ave. to E. Perkins SE. I always see a long line waiting for left turn without opposing traffic. X Please improve the Talmage Bridge crossing. When you travel eastbound , before you pass the railroad track that is the bridge. Pedestrians and bicyclists are fighting their way through the mixed car traffic. Very dangerous! X More bike lanes and promotion and celebration of existing bike lanes. X Smart train to Ukiah. X State Street is very dry. We can try road diet, have bicycle lanes, street scaping, turn bays. X The intersection Tedford & Laws has a terrible ditch. X The entry to Hillside clinic has a ditch. X Lockwood Drive is in great need of repairs. This area is promoting walking to school, but the street is not very walkable. X Arreglar pavimartacien de unai calles * Fix paving on streets. X Normalize bike riding to help with transportation issues. X Light rail service to Bay Area. X Bike lanes to all areas. X Support smart train extension to Ukiah. X Trains!!! X Install bike racks in public possession. X Page 170 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 5 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y Ruta para bicicleta alrededor de las escuelas primarias actualmente me resulta peligroso llegar en bici. * Cycling route around elementary school is currently dangerous for me to arrive by bike. X Housing Lack of housing for market rate buyers. X Need more working class housing without grants. City needs to expand jobs = housing, housing =jobs. X Res: Housing in neighborhoods 18-25 years old. X Build energy efficient housing now - What are you waiting for? Including housing for homeless. X Affordable housing, some form of rent control. X More small housing options to house homeless. X Need low income affordable housing. X Housing - Affordable housing is unaffordable to most. X Creating innovative housing/community projects. X Gentrification awareness and renters’ rights union. X Rent control single family dwellings. X Market value senior housing! X I'd like to see a better plan for affordable housing. X Resident owned park - i.e., Mobile homes are the answer to housing for the elderly & young working couples. Units can be from 500 to 1800 square feet. X More home buying programs. X No rent control!! X Economics Long range budget to allow for streets & roads to be maintained every five years. X Too many regulations hamper business in neighborhoods & small scale development. X More jobs or companies that pay more than minimum wage and a future for the employees. X I was very surprised to see the decreased population on one of the posters. Hope that the city could investigate more of this critical issue. Maybe the housing & economic development provide a more sustainable living, working environment. X Encourage cannabis and wine tourism. X Tax sharing agreement with County. X Retail/Businesses Long range budget to allow for streets & roads to be maintained every five years. X Encourage businesses to maintain their stores - offer some sort of incentive. - No parking on lawns of homes. X Help for new businesses. X Page 171 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 6 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y More jobs or companies that pay more than minimum wage and a future for the employees. X Local Banks! X Revamped downtown promoting *nightlife/events *more family events. X Get some competition for Adventist [Health Ukiah Valley]. Lure Kaiser or Sutter to have more physicians. X Development/Design Infill rather than sprawl - Look at ways to have higher density housing. X Prioritize in-fill for reduced urban sprawl and conversion of agricultural land. X Work with County to discuss any incorporation areas - Collaboration is better. X Permitting for structures related to agriculture. Lower barriers for new farmers. X Promote smaller houses in 100 to 400 square foot range- perhaps as ADU's. X How to help individual existing residences become energy efficient with solar access if low-income? X Sustainable downtown multi-use housing (shops below-apts up top) Walkable, Communities, reduce traffic, reduce carbon footprint. X Walkable housing so people can do without a car. X Development is important because it's the source of income to keep the city, the residents striving. However, each development will need to be examined and make sure it fits the green concept, reduce carbon footprint etc. X in-fill development will reduce urban sprawl. Need to conserve ag. Land as much as possible - especially prime farmland. X Reduce urban sprawl for reduced greenhouse gas emissions. X Is it time to incorporate more of the county? Perhaps at least as far as the edge of the old masonite property & possibly it too. How far can the city extend its electricity capacity? X Land that the city owns, what can we do with them? -public use, -gardens, -soccer fields? X Explain to residents how they benefit from having solar panels on their roofs. X Making our city be a local garden supporting city. X City building retrofits to net zero X More infill, grow vertically. X Create urban boundaries. X Promoting more mixed use space downtown. X Protection of ag. lands paired with higher density development. X Corridors to open space outside of city limits - facilitate rec. X Promote roof-top gardens. Simplify permitting process. X Page 172 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 7 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y Establish real growth boundaries to preserve rural beauty & force development to density & enliven the downtown core. X Zoning changes for future buildings. X Food court for mobile food vendors!! (Yes!) X Rainwater retainment should be a part of all new buildings. X List of vacant properties for development could be made public to explore alternative uses. X Revise ordinances to remove barriers to end up with dense, fiscally stable pedestrian& bike friendly zero emissions city. Remove setbacks, height limits - exclusionary zoning. X Services and Programs Antagonistic relationship with San District. X Need higher ed. Services. X System for mentally ill. X Poor street drainage on Perkins. X Working to house everyone - not accepting "homeless" as a given. Working to cut the US military budget so we don't have endless fights at the "bottom". X Continue to work on solutions with the County on homeless issues. Show how funding = benefit. X Water - What do we do to make sure there's enough for the community? Purple pipe good idea. - What else can be done? X What is happening with the city's recycling, etc.? Need more focus on that, especially businesses. X Expansion of city/county - power/utility. X House homeless people. X Make Ukiah's electric grid infrastructure so power can move 2 ways & take advantage of local generation. X Subsidies for water storage from drain spouts. X All new and existing programs should be evaluated to create as little pollution as possible or we don't reach 2040. X The homeless need help! X Increase power resilience to grid power shutdowns and natural emergencies. X Problem with access to health care providers. X Engage homeless to participate in trash pick-up & other activities. X Gender neutral public facilities. X Clinics long waiting list, more providers, acute & long term. X More promotion of bilingual events. X Campanos sobre el papel de los padres en la educacion. Salud emocional. * Campaigns on the role of parents in educational health. X Page 173 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 8 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y Tener staff que realmente sea bilingue. * Have staff that is really bilingual X Music, art classes. A place for kids other than public library with access of internet, arts, crafts. X Community gardens are important - Children should learn to grow food. X Support small farmers. Establish local processing plants. (Daier Canning, Comm. Kitchens, Buck Storage) X Subsidize renewable energy collection and storage for residences, businesses and city services. X Work with MCC to give more short-term classes by community members with teachable skills. More public transportation to MCC from around town. X Places youth can go on weekends. X Assist cannabis growers with fees! X Ukiah utilities. Build solar panel covered parking lots. X Renewable development fund for homeowners. X More kid friendly business/activity choices. X Provide financial, material labor support to connect community gardens to greywater line. X It would be great to give everyone in the city a container in their green waste that could go in their kitchen - especially with a label of instructions. To be emptied into the larger bin. X Promote energy audits. - Tool lending library - PACE - rebates - Incentives for green building. X Exposicion de musica y arte para ninos y jovenes. * Exebition of music and art for children and young people. X Complejo deportivo alberca techada para invierno. Salones multiuso para actividades. Como: baile zumba, musica skate, pintura etc. a precias bajos. Sequir el modelo de CV stars Fort Bragg para tener un lugar con las mismas condiciones en Ukiah a un precio razonable. * Sports complex, indoor pool for Winter. Multipurpose rooms for activities like Zumba dance, skate music, painting etc. at low prices. Follow the model of CV stars Fort Bragg to have a place with the same conditions in Ukiah at a reasonable price. X Parks and Open Space Clear western hills of brush - need a fire break. Residents need to care for their own residences also. X Lack of parks on S&E Ukiah. X ADD redwood trees to those protected in town. Remove flammable eucalyptus. X Preserve open space and smart, balanced development. X City Gym or Rec area with soccer fields, pools, tennis, basketball courts. Outdoor workout equipment. X Page 174 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 9 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y Recreational places for our kids and youth. X Creating parks and byways, such as across town (rail to trail) & Russian River parks. X We need parks and green space on the south end of town. X Protection of prime ag. soils enhance potential for long term sustainability of the ag. based economy. X I would like to see more green spaces near low income areas. Soccer fields. X Continue to maintain public space. X Existing ag. conservation easements (i.e.. Lover's Ln.) provide opportunity for incorporation/expansion of open space/greenway - expanded urban growth boundary. X More spaces for music, beer gardens etc. to bring community together downtown. X Greenways! X Low Gap Park! Yay! X Greenspace included in all new development. X Maintain the wonderful trees of Ukiah. X Access up to Gibson Creek to Low Gap for hiking. X Create public space around the economic core of Ukiah. In the Gobbi/Main Mill. X Wouldn't it be excellent to have a covered, year round facility for concerts, community events and farmer's markets. X Open space along Gibson Creek in Western Hills. X The rail Trail is underutilized. Should we have food trucks, benches and events there? X Porque acuatico y salones multiusos, asadores. * Water, multipurpose rooms and grills. X City Identity/Community We need a simple and streamlined process for allowing public art on private buildings. X Art attracts tourists who spend money in cafes, hotels & shops. This county is blessed with many artists. Fund public art! X State Street is very "dry". Need to plant more trees. More street-scaping. Road diet to make the city more attractive. X Keep arts & music classes in ALL schools. X More banners all over the city for upcoming events like the one across State St. X Tourist attractions in Ukiah. X We need to see more city event banners other than just the one by The Alex Thomas Plaza. X Creating more events that reach all communities. X Keep community activities going, continue to build - family oriented. X More culturally diverse community events. More Spanish language used in these events. A Latino night at the ice-skating event. X As there are so many good artists in Ukiah, the city should always celebrate the arts. X Page 175 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 10 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y I would love to see The Grace Hudson museum more strongly connected to historic downtown. X Arts bring tourists to Ukiah. X More public art. It engages people of all ages & ethnicities & brings funds into the area. X Celebrate diversity & educate about the historic culture of local native people. X Environmental Considerations More money to support solar installations. X Subsidies for improved building insulation. X Work towards developing businesses that re-use plastic &/or other "garbage". This will help our other unemployment problems & the environment. X Transition to renewable energy. X Climate Change! De-carbonize or energy system. X Climate crisis SHALL be addressed! X Climate change - mitigations shall be addressed. X How to sequester carbon? X Stop all pesticide use in city limits especially in school yards. X General Plan needs to address climate changes, Green house impact. How can the development in Ukiah adopt & fitting such scope, such as encouraging biking, walking, road diet? X Climate change is a reality. The city needs to address how to mitigate its effects. X There are new buildings and developments throughout the city that STILL don't have solar. X The 1995 General Plan had lots of good ideas relating to a reduced carbon emission impact. They have not been done. X Increase tree canopy in a major way. X How does the city plan to meet and comply with state requirements re: climate crisis. X Phase out natural gas. Plan to decarbonize buildings. X City subsidized efficiency energy. (LED's, Heat pumps, Local micro grids) X Solar & wind power - turbines in Low Gap. X Regenerative gardening. Wise water use. X Cool roofs, cool pavements. X Electrify muni vehicles, phase out internal combustion. X Build micro grids for solar efficiency for neighborhoods and subdivisions. X Zero waste cap or tap methane in landfill. X LED lighting: city, residents, streetlights. X Community solar and storage net zero for new construction. X Low gap road Municipal building's solar potential. Lots of wind too. X Charging stations for E.V.'s. X Page 176 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 11 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y We need solar powered or wind powered homes & neighborhood microgrid. X Incentive renovating existing buildings. X Reduce idling with solar shade structures. X Promote Carbon Sequestration. - Plant trees. Institute a tree ordinance. -Promote regenerative agriculture. - Ban herbicides/pesticides. X Promote heat pumps. X No more fossil fuel infrastructure. X We should re-lamp the city with LED's X How can we decarbonize existing buildings? X Need a polystyrene ban. X Let's tap into the old landfill & use the methane there to be piped into a power generating system. X Require all electric (solar wind) homes- even if they are set up for gas as well. X City should have a no idling ordinance so people don't sit spewing out greenhouse gas emissions in parking lots and drive- thrus X California plant native trees and bushes. X We should have a City Climate Coordinator - Either a new position or an expanded one. X Pass garden-friendly resolution like Fort Bragg. X Incentive for 20% of developed green space to incorporate food producing spaces. X How can we institute a disposable foodware ban? X Hazards and Safety Threat of wildfire needs to be mitigated. X Future fire hazards, bury the lines. X Other Overuse of plastics/Plastic waste management. X Low quality public works construction oversight. X Gov. needs to be flexible and creative! - to enable community ownership of public spaces. X Assume this is the golden time when it's possible to change & improve - future will be much tougher. X Access to healthy foods in S. Ukiah - FRESH FOODS! X Change diet to more local food. X Tree attrition, need more! X How will the new General Plan comply with The State Requirements? X Make dog owners responsible to not disturb their neighborhoods with barking. X Clasifican los videojuegos como otra forma de actividad viciosa y concientizar a ca poblacion * Classify video games as another form of vicious activity and raise awareness of the population. X Page 177 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 12 of 39 Participant Comments Is s u e Op p o r t u n i t y Traduccion correcta de la informacion en Espanol. Porque las traducciones que hacen. No les entiendo! * Correct translation of information in Spanish. Because the translations they have, I do not understand them! X Engaging and supporting leadership in the Latinx community X In the 1995 Ukiah General Plan, 4.04 Site Planning. How much of it has actually been implemented and enforced? X Recruit more local farmers to farmers market. X Promote free vegetation management for low-income land owners. X Vegetarian friendly. X College town. X I'd like to see a ban of the pesticide Glyphosate in Ukiah where possible. X Harm reduction Ukiah should take a stand to outlaw vaping. X Friendly to young families. X "Tidy Town" concept i.e. same as they have in Ireland. X Include fruit trees in tree planting initiatives. X City fleet should be completely electric. X How about an on-going suggestion box for ideas the city could incorporate? X Flexible and creative government that fosters community power + agency + ownership of public space. X Expansion of local power production. X Page 178 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 13 of 39 Station #3 – Visioning Station #3 included an interactive engagement exercise focused on soliciting feedback on a vision for the City. The exercise used a “Mad Lib” style approach where community members could fill in a blank vision statement for Ukiah using sample key attributes (i.e., adjectives, assets, and values) or fill in the blanks with words they feel are appropriate. Participants placed these attributes on a magnetic board to create their own vision. Once participants finished filling out their desired vision, they were photographed with their vision statement. This exercise was highly successful and captured opinions from a wide demographic. Below is the fill in the blank vision statement used at the events and the following page show the list of attributes that participants used to create their vision for Ukiah. Ukiah 2040 General Plan Visioning Exercise Ukiah is a/an [adjective] _______________ community that is built on [3 values] ________________, ________________, and ________________. We are proud to live in a city with a/an [adjective] _______________ [3 assets]________________, and ________________, ________________. Page 179 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 14 of 39 Visioning Exercise Key Attributes Values Assets Adjectives Safety la seguridad Trust confiar Sense of Community sentido de comunidad Inclusiveness inclusividad Sense of Heritage and Tradition sentido del patrimonio y la tradición Collaboration colaboración Health salud Fiscal Responsibility responsabilidad fiscal Community Participation participación comunitaria Creativity creatividad Social Equity igualdad social Education educación Fun divertido Entrepreneurship emprendimiento Transparent Local Government gobierno local transparente Sustainability sustentabilidad Resiliency resistencia Open Space espacio abierto Parks parques Natural Resources recursos naturales Historic Resources recursos históricos Airport aeropuerto Community Events eventos comunitarios Civic Facilities instalaciones cívicas Hillsides laderas Neighborhoods los vecindarios Highway 101 Carretera 101 Location la localización Schools escuelas Community College colegio comunitario Shopping compras Recreation Opportunities oportunidades de recreación Trails caminos Downtown céntrico Economic Diversity diversidad económica Social Services servicios sociales Changing cambiando Friendly amistoso Diverse diverso Unique único Welcoming acogedor Family-oriented orientado a la familia Engaging contratarando Close-knit muy unido Walkable transitable Bikeable transporte de bicicleta Vibrant vibrante Business-friendly favorable a los negocios Proactive proactivo Transparent transparente Sustainable sostenible Resilient la resistencia The full list of community visions from participants are shown below. This information will help inform the development of a Vision Statement for the community as well as guide work on the alternatives analysis and development of the goals, policies, and programs that will guide the community towards this future. Page 180 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 15 of 39 Documented Community Visions 1 Ukiah is a/an Diverse (diverso) community that is built on Sustainability (sustentabilidad), Creativity (creatividad), and Inclusiveness (inclusividad). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Walkable (transitable) Open Space (espacio abierto), Trails (caminos), and Parks (parques). 2 Ukiah is a/an Engaging (contratarando) community that is built on Fun (divertido), Collaboration colaboración, and Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an Business-friendly (favorable a los negocios) Schools (escuelas), Community Events (eventos comunitarios), and Recreation Opportunities (oportunidades de recreación). 3 Ukiah is a/an Family-oriented (orientado a la familia) community that is built on Sustainability (sustentabilidad), Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad), and Health (salud). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) family-oriented (orientado a la familia) Downtown (céntrico), Parks (parques) and Community Events (eventos comunitarios). 4 Ukiah is a/an Family-oriented (orientado a la familia) community that is built on Sustainability (sustentabilidad), Entrepreneurship (emprendimiento), and Community Participation. We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Welcoming (acogedor), Downtown (céntrico), Community Events (eventos comunitarios), and Economic Diversity (diversidad económica). 5 Ukiah is a/an Resilient (la Resistencia) community that is built on Education (educación) Entrepreneurship (emprendimiento), and Social Equity (igualdad social). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Vibrant (vibrante), Schools (escuelas), Social Services (servicios sociales) and Economic Diversity (diversidad económica). 6 Ukiah is a/an Sustainable (sostenible) community that is built on Social Equity (igualdad social), Education (educación), and Arts (artes). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Diverse (diverso), Trails (caminos), Natural Resources (recursos naturales) and Community College (colegio comunitario). 7 Ukiah is a/an Diverse (diverso) community that is built on Education (educación), Community Participation (participación comunitaria), and Entrepreneurship (emprendimiento). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Vibrant (vibrante), Community College, Parks (parques) and Community Events (eventos comunitarios). 8 Ukiah is a/an Welcoming (acogedor) community that is built on Creativity (creatividad), Entrepreneurship (emprendimiento), and Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Vibrant (vibrante), Downtown (céntrico), Historic Resources (recursos históricos) and Recreation Opportunities. 9 Ukiah is a/an Bikeable (transporte de Bicicleta) community that is built on Social Equity (igualdad social), Sustainability (sustentabilidad), and Health (salud). We are proud to live in a Page 181 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 16 of 39 Documented Community Visions city with (a/an) Vibrant (vibrante), Social Services (servicios sociales), Trails (caminos) and Community Events (eventos comunitarios). 10 Ukiah is a/an Vibrant (vibrante) community that is built on Creativity (creatividad), Sustainability (sustentabilidad), and Collaboration (colaboración). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Unique (único), Arts (Artes), Trails (caminos), and Shopping (compras). 11 Ukiah is a/an Walkable (transitable) community that is built on Sustainability (sustentabilidad), Social Equity (igualdad social), and Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Sustainable (sostenible) Social Services (servicios sociales), Parks (parques) and Downtown (céntrico). 12 Ukiah is a/an Transparent (transparente) community that is built on Social Equity (igualdad social), Fiscal Responsibility (responsabilidad fiscal), and Entrepreneurship (emprendimiento). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Sustainable (sostenible) Historic Resources (recursos históricos), Community College (colegio comunitario) and Economic Diversity (diversidad económica). 13 Ukiah is a/an Business-friendly (favorable a los negocios) community that is built on Education (educación), Entrepreneurship (emprendimiento), and Fiscal Responsibility (responsabilidad fiscal). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Engaging (contratarando), Community Events (eventos comunitarios), Recreation Opportunities (oportunidades de recreación) and Schools (escuelas). 14 Ukiah is a/an Arts (Artes) community that is built on Collaboration (colaboración), Inclusiveness (inclusividad), and Sense of Heritage and Tradition (sentido del patrimonio y la tradición). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Engaging (contratarando), Economic Diversity (diversidad económica), Recreation Opportunities (oportunidades de recreación) and Natural Resources (recursos naturales). 15 Ukiah is a/an Resilient (la Resistencia) community that is built on Inclusiveness (inclusividad), Transparent Local Government (gobierno local transparente), and Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Vibrant (vibrante), Economic Diversity (diversidad económica), Natural Resources (recursos naturales) and Recreation Opportunities (oportunidades de recreación). 16 Ukiah is a/an Welcoming (acogedor) community that is built on Inclusiveness (inclusividad), Fiscal Responsibility (responsabilidad fiscal), and Sense of Heritage and Tradition (sentido del patrimonio y la tradición). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Diverse (diverso), Recreation Opportunities (oportunidades de recreación), Parks (parques) and Community College (colegio comunitario). 17 Ukiah is a/an Vibrant (vibrante) community that is built on Community Participation Page 182 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 17 of 39 Documented Community Visions (participación comunitaria), Social Equity (igualdad social), and Resiliency (resistencia). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Sustainable (sostenible) Economic Diversity (diversidad económica), Natural Resources (recursos naturales), and Social Services (servicios sociales). 18 Ukiah is a/an Diverse (diverso) community that is built on Inclusiveness (inclusividad), Sustainability (sustentabilidad), and Social Equity (igualdad social). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Sustainable (sostenible) Economic Diversity (diversidad económica), Natural Resources (recursos naturales), and Parks (parques). 19 Ukiah is a/an Diverse (diverso) community that is built on Inclusiveness (inclusividad), Sustainability (sustentabilidad), and Resiliency (Resistencia). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Sustainable (sostenible) Economic Diversity (diversidad económica), Trails (caminos), and Parks (parques). 20 Ukiah is a/an Diverse (diverso) community that is built on Sustainability (sustentabilidad), Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad), and Trust (confiar). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Vibrant (vibrante) Downtown (céntrico), Green Landscape (Paisaje verde), and Highway 101 (Carretera 101). 21 Ukiah is a/an Arts (artes) community that is built on Creativity (creatividad), Inclusiveness i9nclusividad), and Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad). We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Engaging (contratarando) Historic Resources (recursos históricos), and Green Landscape (Paisaje verde). 22 Ukiah is a/an Welcoming (acogedor) community that is built on Sense of Community (sentido de comunidad), Entrepreneurship (emprendimiento), and Collaboration colaboración. We are proud to live in a city with (a/an) Vibrant (vibrante) Neighborhoods (los vecindarios), Community Events (eventos comunitarios), and Natural Resources (recursos naturale). General Comments The following are general comments received at the Community Workshop. All comments are listed verbatim as received and are in no particular order or ranking. Participant Comments There's no time to lose in addressing how our city deals with climate concerns! Emissions, disasters power outages, power! New buildings. Let's be a model for what should be done for zero net energy. We can do it! Use grants! We need to also look at the demographics of school children. We have a growing population of retirees. Page 183 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 18 of 39 Participant Comments Main Street and Waugh Ln need paving!!! Question: When will the city insist that the "Palace Hotel" (a blight on the city) be demolished??? The west side of Ukiah needs a through street or series of passages west of Gobbi St. How come we have a drop in population and an increase in traffic- Mendocino College needs a second road to North State Street. PumpkinFest 2019: Topic: Existing Conditions and Trends, Identification of Issues and Opportunities, and Visioning Location: Downtown Ukiah Attendance: Over 200 community participants The City hosted a General Plan Pop-Up Booth at the Ukiah PumpkinFest on October 19, 2019, at the Alex R. Thomas Plaza. The pop-up booth consisted of similar activities to those at Community Workshop #1. Participants were able to view existing conditions posters as well as mark-up a map of the City where they feel change should occur. The map feedback will help inform the Alternatives Process of the General Plan update. As part of the pop-up booth participants were provided with a survey (in both English and Spanish) to complete that included two exercises relating to a vison for Ukiah in 2040 and issues that should be addressed as part of the update. Each of the activities and the results of the survey are located on the following pages. General comment cards were also received from community members who visited the pop-up booth, with all comments listed verbatim at the end of this document. Page 184 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 19 of 39 PumpkinFest 2019 Survey: English Version Page 185 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 20 of 39 PumpkinFest 2019 Survey: Spanish Version Page 186 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 21 of 39 Vision for the Future (Page 1 of the PumpkinFest General Plan Survey) Participants were asked to select three values, assets, and adjectives that describe Ukiah in 2040. These three descriptors help derive each participants vision for the community over the next 20 years. This exercise is like the mad lib exercise from Community Workshop #1, where all the selected descriptors will help inform an overall Vision Statement and Guiding Principles for the General Plan Update. Since PumpkinFest generally draws visitors from outside of Ukiah, the survey included an initial question that asked where participants lived. This allowed for the disaggregation of feedback collected from those who live in Ukiah and those who do not. Values Based on the feedback received the three values that participants highlighted the most were safety, health, and education. All three value descriptors received were noted by more than 10 percent of participants who took the survey. 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% Top Values Inside Ukiah City Limits Outside Ukiah City Limits Page 187 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 22 of 39 Assets Based on the feedback received the three assets that participants highlighted the most were parks, community events, and schools. All three value descriptors received more noted by more than 10 percent of participants who took the survey, with over 16 percent of participants who live in Ukiah noting parks as their top choice. 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% Top Assets Inside Ukiah City Limits Outside Ukiah City Limits Page 188 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 23 of 39 Adjectives Based on the feedback received the three adjectives that describe Ukiah in 2040 that participants highlighted were friendly, diverse, welcoming, and family-oriented. All value descriptors received more noted by more than 10 percent of participants who took the survey, with over 14 percent of participants noting Ukiah as friendly as their top choice. Community Identified Issues (Page 2 of the PumpkinFest General Plan Survey) The following are community-identified issues received at the PumpkinFest 2019 General Plan Booth. All the issues listed in the following table (in the blue columns) were part of the General Plan Survey on page 2 that was given to all participants who stopped by the booth. Participants listed comments below for each issue. All comments are listed verbatim as received and are in no particular order or ranking. Where issues have an adjacent number (#), indicates the amount of times that particular issue was noted by participants. Community Identified Issues Transportation and Parking • Torn up streets • Traffic (3) • Dangerous sidewalks • Fix ADA camps 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% Top Adjectives Inside Ukiah City Limits Outside Ukiah City Limits Page 189 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 24 of 39 Community Identified Issues • Fix roads (11) • Road improvements • Make them where you can see them at night • More lights on the street • Most of the streets need a lot of repairs • Light the crosswalks • Parking (4) • Better crosswalk striping • More bike/ walking opportunities • Traffic/ Possibility of one lane downtown • Road quality • Unsafe bike trails, get rid of heroine needles • Freeway exits dangerous, too short - merging together • Streets/ potholes • Road repair without & before changes are made to State Street • Roads/ street repair (4) • Maintaining streets/ Avoiding empty buildings (incentives for businesses) • Fix the potholes/ roads • Better crosswalks (2) • Better roads/ traffic redirection • Scratch the downtown plan to redo the road. Two lane State Street is going to be chaotic. • Better roads/streets • Roads (19) • Visually appealing streets, better sidewalks. • Transportation • Smart train (2) • Streets need lots of work (hard on cars) • Airport - Flights to L.A., Oregon, Las Vegas • Smart train to commute to Santa Rosa area • The poor road/ street conditions • Potholes • State Street - ugly and dangerous • Try to get on SMART train line • Roads need some work Housing • Affordable Housing (7) • Housing & homelessness • Do not need farmworker housing • Housing (16) • Affordable housing - middle income • Need for affordable housing (2) • Cost of housing • Housing (for all) • More housing for working young people • Housing for low income (2) • More homes • More apartments • Middle class housing • Accessible housing • New housing • Housing shortage • Available, affordable housing • More living for low income Page 190 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 25 of 39 Community Identified Issues • Develop sustainable housing • Housing, fewer motels Economics • Maintain/ grow economic vitality • More jobs (6) • Tourism • Fiscal responsibility (Don’t spend money on things that can be a contest in the community) • Higher salaries • Better job opportunities • Better job opportunities for young adults • Increased wages • Economic diversity, sustainable jobs • More open jobs for teens • Getting our share of cannabis business & funds • Economic prosperity • Taxes • Fix median income - bring industry Retail/Businesses • More family attractions • Shopping • Very few places for teens to go, bring back bowling alley etc. • Mall • Concert hall (live events) • Affordable shopping • More manufacturing jobs or jobs with a higher rate of pay • More entertainment (3) • Fun businesses, events, since things like Skate City, bowling alley shut down. • Facilities for family fun (bowling alley, skate rink, parks, walking trails) • Increase in affordable shopping venues • Better restaurants • Family entertainment opportunities • Keep local businesses in business • More shopping locations • Shopping and other restaurants!!! (different cuisines) Development/Design • Better, faster processing for permits • Maintaining livable single-family neighborhoods • Space and population • Get rid of the Palace Hotel & pull in multi- floor parking • Repair or reface buildings • Downtown development • Construction (too much going on with nothing being improved) • Put money/ resources into infrastructure, upkeep • Scaled down overhead and permit process • Renovate downtown • Growth • Construction Page 191 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 26 of 39 Community Identified Issues • Development • Figure out what is going on with the Palace Hotel • Sprawl grows • infill multi-units, residential above commercial • It's getting too big! • Services and Programs • Support people in poverty/ homeless • Mental health (3) • Family activities • Healthcare (6) • Infrastructure (roads, creeks, fire safety) • Higher education • Schools - Improve school facilities • Fix water/ sewer utilities • Better relations with local tribes • Schools (6) • Fix water/ sewer utilities • Homeless/ mental health • Youth programs (2) • Cleaning streets/ parks • Education (4) • Parks cleanup • Homeless services (2) • Resources • Mental health services (1) • More adult recreational options for entertainment • We need a place for youth to hang out (2) • More activity options • Things to do for young and old people • Activities that are family and teen- friendly (2) • More recreation for families & kids & kid vocational centers & skate rink. Lost bowling alley. • Things for teens and seniors to do (2) • Keeping things clean, updated • Things for kids to do (3) • Better education for public schools • Infrastructure assistance • Better solutions for homeless/ mental health population (2) • The schools are a joke • Need bigger jail • Need mental health hospital • Activities for kids/ families • More open events for schools all over Ukiah • Teenagers need more activities to keep them out of trouble, alcohol, drugs, fights. • Schools!! The highest rated school is 5/10, I don’t to send my child to Ukiah for school. • Quality of education for middle and high schools • Music classes • Children's activity center • More events during the school year Page 192 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 27 of 39 Community Identified Issues • Providing appropriate help for the homeless • More schools • Homeless population getting work not just getting shelter • Community fundraiser • Affordable child care • Larger library • Public Works • Shelters/ resources • More help for the mentally unstable • Youth and young adult entertainment options • Special Ed. programs • Resources for educational needs • Family oriented activities • Focus more on education • Drug rehabilitation • More recreational places for youth • Maintenance around town • Utility sustainability (solar, electric) • Medical health (2) o Parks and Open Space • Maintaining natural resources/ parks • More open space • Parks (3) • Keep parks clean and updated • Lack of recreation • Get rid of walking trail on tracks, that was stupid • Finish the rest of the blueprints for the skatepark • Walking paths in South Ukiah/ Oak ct rd/ Oak Knoll • Bike paths at south end • Upgrade and improve park play areas • Recreation/ sports fields • Soccer fields • Recreational fields i.e., artificial turf fields • Indoor recreation for kids • More parks and hiking trails • More parks and hiking trails • Big open area just for anything, no events • Pet parks • Dog (pet) park renewal • Recreational activities • Better use of park management • Retain natural resources • Parks - recreational areas for kids • City Identity/Community • Community • Historical preservation • Lack of things to do • More diversity in community • Statue in the plaza recognizing the local Indian heritage • More community things • The 4th of July celebration at Todd Grove is a great asset. The city pool sponsoring neon lights is appreciated. Kidovation (a business) made things easier for us • Diversity Page 193 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 28 of 39 Community Identified Issues teachers on in-service days. We like the clean up efforts at Vinewood Park. • Culture center • More festivals like Pumpkinfest • Arts - concert venues - shopping. • • Environmental Considerations • Long term sustainability • More sustainable farming and energy • Less littering and taking care of the environment • Natural resources/ sustainability • Ecofriendly • Climate change • Increasing sustainability and environmental protection • Climate change is the most important thing to address. How does our community prepare and plan for natural disasters? Hazards and Safety • Prepare for & respond to natural disasters • Gangs • Fire prevention • Overall Safety (10) • Need a safer City • Violent Crime (2) • Safety for the public • School safety • School system safety • Information during issues faster • Lack of safety in community • Safety improvements • Safety. You can’t shop downtown if you don’t feel safe • Fire safety • Crime/ transients - I don’t feel safe coming to Ukiah with my child. • Community watch • Anti-gangs • Violence (youth shootings, stabbings, etc.) Other • Homeless (65) • Everything's pricy • Diversity • Homeless/ transient population • Getting a climbing gym • Bums • Too many homeless (sad) • Income inequality • Cleanliness • Transient/Homelessness (3) • Cleanliness of public areas • Public safety & friendliness of both fire and police towards public • Get rid of all the homeless • Rude teens, they need guidance Page 194 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 29 of 39 Community Identified Issues • Quit taking care of homeless and illegal farm workers • Drug culture • Parent - child relationships • Get rid of the drugged out tweekers • Quit awarding contracts to out of the area contractors. You preach about "buy local" start acting like it. • Large amount of homelessness • Public restrooms • Responsible fun • Littering • Recycling • Drug/ alcohol addiction • Nicer people • More fun things to do • Poverty • Drug use • City clean up • Garbage on streets • Hospital • We need people to see for the people not for the government • We need people to see for the people not for the government • Pet friendly establishments • Graffiti • Keep up the good work • Develop green industry in Old Masonite area. Unless income can be addressed, this town cannot change & support housing needs of growth. Expand city limits. Tax on greater size - do it as a celebration of growth - (perception) General Comments The following are general comments received at the PumpkinFest 2019 General Plan Booth. These items are presented as written, without editing, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the City. Any comments that contained profanities were removed. Participant Comments Super excited about the downtown project. Please stop patching roads and start fixing them. Mendocino road has become a racetrack, we need speed bumps. We need a climbing gym Need housing for lower income families that are not on welfare. Keep working hard! Thanks Page 195 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 30 of 39 Participant Comments River park would be great. Please build a memorial statue to honor Pomo history and place it in the park that honors a rancher i.e.., Alex Thomas Plaza - Please address global warming. Need more events I love Ukiah! More activities for kids, nothing to do Support our local schools It would be great to provide more of our own local food, veggies, dairy, meat. Develop sustainable energy sources - solar. Make more public transportation. Better hiking and biking trails. Need another store/ stores in the downtown area Use inmates to clean hwy & Lake Mendocino campgrounds (Sheriff Dept). Miniature golf course for kids and family, water park, bowling alley... Large amounts of money should not be spent on a "slogan" or a website when it easily could have been provided by the college or community members through a contest. Ukiah has huge potential but locals and outsiders alike need to feel safe in the community (going to parks, walking downtown and other areas, etc.) The proposed State Street changes will harm rather than help the downtown merchants. If streets do not get immediate attention you will soon have muddy, rutted wagon trails - appreciate those that have been done but if you proceed with the State Street Shannon Memorial Roadway you will be pushing daily traffic onto the side streets. The light down School Street adds character to the downtown. Nice to see them all working. Trash containers need to be maintained! Our city officials need to listen and then heed citizens opinions and desires. For instance, (THE R STREET DIET!) Decision made even though many citizens objected. Major issue, Ukiah needs to get under control its homelessness. The town seems to have more crime lately (i.e., theft, break-ins) Use inmates to clean up our town, Lake Mendocino & campgrounds. Need to look at economic diversity and also address cultural sensitivity, address homelessness. Everything closes at 5 - not friendly for those that work 8-5. I know we all want to keep the small town vibe, but at the same time, we need to be able to work for a decent wage. Many of us commute to Santa Rosa and beyond to achieve this lifestyle. I am a Mendocino county resident (30 years) and have been disappointed with our town/ county. Considering moving to different county unless the county/ city starts addressing the transients, drug use in our community, and low rated education system. I don't want to leave my hometown but am so scared to raise my child here. Please let me know what we can do to help our town return to the greatest small town in California. The community events are great! I believe the sense of community is amazing. Don’t lose that! Open facilities for kids/ teens Page 196 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 31 of 39 Participant Comments Shop at local businesses. Thank you for the candy! And opportunity to help make a change in our community! Segregation Thriving community is based on thriving industry. Allow us to thrive. Right now Ukiah is doing great! Keep up the good work! Park in Wagenseller neighborhood Police need more Hispanic and women I think we should spend more time on the people in our town, rather than the way the town looks. There is a serious lack of intrigue in parks staying manageable and well kept. They are lumpy and dangerous for athletic activity. Pet friendly areas Vagrancy Page 197 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 32 of 39 Online Engagement: Topic: Identification of Issues and Opportunities and Visioning Location: General Plan Website (ukiah2040.com) Attendance: 35 community participants Identification of Issues and Opportunities The General Plan website included a series of interactive exercises that focused on topics previously covered at both Community Workshop #1 and the General Plan Pop-Up Booth at PumpkinFest. This was meant to allow for those who were not able to attend either of the previous events the ability to submit feedback related to the General Plan process. The following exercise asked participants to select their five issues and opportunities that they feel the General Plan should address. The following table includes all collected feedback from those who participated in the online exercise. These items are presented as written, without editing, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the City. Any comments that contained profanities were removed. Top Five Identified Issues Environmental Sustainability Fix the roads/streets. The need for in-fill housing Road repair on low gap Homelessness, homeless waste produced and cleanup more bike lanes and pedestrian zones Downtown is NOT attractive to tourists Climate Chaos. Needs to be addressed at every level from individual to world and every institution between. Ban idling, Support regenerative ag, agroforestry, emissions reduction. Promote infill housing (e.g., condos, apartments, etc.) in underutilized, vacant, and blighted properties and prioritizing properties closest to the downtown core. Do this by incentivizing development, seeking developers, etc. Whatever it takes! The more people that live close to downtown, the more vital the City will become and more jobs will be created and this will help the overall economy. Make the railroad depot functional- trains to the coast via Willits, fast train to bay area. More accessible open space Exercise infrastructure: Ukiah lacks trail systems and bike lanes, especially on the south side Green space, open space Street and sidewalk conditions Affordable housing Page 198 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 33 of 39 Top Five Identified Issues Our inability to resolve the Palace Hotel as a deteriorating eye-sore and enable a value added cleanup of State Street across from and on the sides of this sad relic. State Street traffic calming. It feels unsafe for pedestrians and generally too fast. Annexation of growth areas Public Services Removal of signs when a business closes. Is there a way the general plan can affect out homeless crisis Road repair on empire fire danger preparation on every level, more clearing, more fire roads, study all areas that have power lines (especially forested) and make those a priority for safety support to retrofit major facilities to use renewable energy Unchanged small-town atmosphere in a changing world Living wages for all. Require businesses to pay $15 minimum/hr tied to inflation from the 2016 dollar, and attract businesses by offsetting their added cost (perhaps a sales tax or wealth tax Secure a tax sharing agreement with the County so that the City can annex the urban areas of Ukiah. The County needs to stop allowing development (other than industrial at Masonite) outside the City limits. Sprawl is not part of Valley residents' vision for the Ukiah Valley! Make the Palace hotel functional condos on the upper floor and shops on the ground floor and mezzanine with central light well to roof. Emphasis on "green" (low to zero carbon-emitting) building Public Water: There aren't enough drinking fountains and the ones that exist are dirty and unfiltered Fire safety Broadband availability Good roads Addressing a grave need to put meaningful effort into upgrading the academic success of our elementary and middle school children in terms of testing and outcomes. Greater trail access and connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists. For example, a path that connects Low Gap to Orr Creek corridor to the East end of Bush near Kohls. Services - Utility, Sewer and Water to areas that are beyond city limits Transportation Do something about the homeless population. Denser housing options and raising building height limits Road repair on n. State street keep improving street conditions more carbon neutral public transportation Homeless people camp around city Homelessness. Solutions include job creation, mental health counseling, street medicine including plants/nutrition, not just allopathic, tiny home parks Page 199 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 34 of 39 Top Five Identified Issues Enforce ordinances around property maintenance and signs. For example, Blue Drug on the corner of Mill and Dora has looked HORRIBLE for at least 10 years. Does it have to be that way? Maybe a carrot, versus a stick, approach would help? re locate courthouse and replace that building with a town square like Healdsburg Better protection/management of riparian areas Inequity: the south side is far underdeveloped compared to the north side (green spaces, social services, event space) Safe pedestrian and bike travel around town, and in large store parking lots Solar energy for government buildings Jobs A needed support by the powers that be to address other major buildings in town which are unable to upgrade and remain viable, such as the Methodist Church Building. Energy Resiliency. We need to be independent of PG & E supplying our energy. We need to break our dependence on unsustainable and imported energy sources. Airport Land Use - Densities and land use limitations need to be expanded upon or allow for greater flexibility Land Use Better enforcement of traffic laws. Stop sign runners, red light runners, red curb parkers, failure to use turn signals etc... The need for a unified planning process and map so that we grow as a community in a smart way rather than our current plot by plot process Palace Hotel - are we waiting for it to fall down and become an emergency before something is done? raising awareness of climate crisis and taking local action Transportation. Add EV chargers at more locations, work with MTA to increase frequency of buses and promote them & cycling over cars. Maintain the plaza downtown. The drinking fountain area and area under the roof are dirty and not very appealing to hang out around. obtain easements for more bike/pedestrian trails away from the roads Waste: How can we recycle? Do people know how to compost/ use green waste bins? Public education Transient issues - trash, crime, human waste, etc. Trenching power lines Safe streets Addressing the inequity of salaries and income of community employees, particularly in the lopsided salaries in administration in comparison to those of others in community. Support for arts in the form of a truly community art center and shared and/or individual studios and gallery space. Look to models such as the Willits center for the arts, and shared studios in Santa Rosa for examples. Page 200 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 35 of 39 Top Five Identified Issues Revised the UCC. Code should encourage and allow uses that the city wants and discourage land uses the city wants to avoid. Code is dated Fix the dilapidated tennis courts and make them dual pickle ball/tennis courts. Historic preservation issues and how we can become a tourist destination. Promoting family and community values Re-focus away from rural factory farm uses to higher education, medical and assisted living facilities. Public Transportation: I would like to see more regular routes up and down State street, with incentive for regular use. Upgrade Perkins street entrance to town - trees, flowers, improved building facades, etc. Improving schools. Going green. Ensuring that our tree coverage does not continue to be destroyed without protections to create a better environment through significant and increased number of heritage trees. Identified Opportunities Consider other issues (energy, transportation) as environmental sustainability Attract a business that caters to all ages, that replaces the loss of the bowling alley and skating rink. Historic preservation is one of the few things we are absolutely missing out on Road repair on low gap Attract more businesses to relocate here (software, consulting, etc) perhaps give certain tax incentives to these businesses to entice them. Nurturing collaborative efforts from local nonprofits, religious groups, schools, to address above issues Make downtown beautiful, clean up and make Ukiah more attractive to tourists Urban agriculture in vacant lots and parks, to sequester carbon as organic matter and perennial roots in soil. Possible works program for homeless. The new streetscape planned for State Street is a huge opportunity for improving the vitality of downtown Ukiah. How can the general plan help to promote this vitality? Foster a long term vision of Ukiah becoming a many faceted cultural and educational center. Green building resources and/or grants Local Food System: with so much local talent and a year- round growing season, Ukiah could have a more innovative and efficient food system Increase sharing of buildings, resources between (for example) young people and senior citizens. Page 201 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 36 of 39 Identified Opportunities Invest in the Mendocino County Brand (awareness through even more advertising, encouraging events/festivals, etc.) More alternative energy Increasing the attractiveness and cleanliness of the entire downtown corridor. Energy Resiliency. We already have an independent contract with PG&E. Let’s invest in our own independent energy grid or multiple micro grids and always have our power up. Annexation of growth areas It would great to have something similar to Ft. Bragg's CV Starr Aquatic Center. Is there a way to bring wine tasting rooms into a more generalized area so that we can attract more tourists attract retirement communities such as Del Webb and others to invest and build in Ukiah. Ukiah businesses would benefit from residents and the services they would need. What's going to happen the courthouse once moved? Make them condos. we have beautiful nature, let's keep it protected and pristine, and promote local parks Upgrade some old stores, invest in new stores A 4 year university - working with Mendocino College to upgrade and/or look at Masonite Site. There is eventually going to be a new courthouse on Perkins St. Is it too early to begin thinking about how to re-purpose the existing courthouse? And the block with the library and City parking lot....how could that become a vibrant part of our downtown, connecting the west and east sides of State Street at Perkins once the new courthouse is in? Not to early to plan!! develop mutual sharing of resources Civic Engagement: incorporate local government into school curriculum and get kids involved early, have local officials visit the classroom Incentives for home owners to add on granny units Cannabis Farms, Events and the tax opportunities they provide Creative planning & zoning Holding open forums for the community on the Palace Hotel as to what conditions are needed to either eliminate or rebuild. Incredible natural areas. We need to promote connecting to our open and natural spaces by bike and foot. Airport Land Use - Densities and land use limitations need to be expanded upon or allow for greater flexibility Build a homeless shelter that is designed for families only. Don't forget about the homeless school kids. Check with the Ukiah Unified School District Office. They have a Liaison. Set aside areas for future schools and medical facilities Re-envision Alex Thomas Plaza as a gathering place not only for special events which seems to be the current case but surrounded by cafes and restaurants for all day activity. Add a small play area for children. Page 202 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 37 of 39 Identified Opportunities support youth to be positively engaged in society - they are our future Issue more building permits, allow the town to grow as prepare for more people to move into town EV fast chargers non-tesla. Ukiah could become a stopping place for all long-range EV's to recharge, not just Teslas. While the level 2's are good for folks working or spending extended time in town, a few high speed chargers would entice long distance drivers to make a stop here and still spend a bit hopefully. I understand that annexation discussions with the County will resume. That is a huge opportunity for the City to re-make Ukiah into an aesthetically pleasing and cohesive urban center. Residential businesses: I would like to see new large businesses have a requirement for building affordable residences on campus Incentives for public to pick up trash Increasing funding to Mendocino College How can we not become another Bay Area commuting community Setting a 95% tenancy of downtown buildings as a goal and setting guidelines on the number of massage, nail, body building and hair salons allowed versus other businesses. The Old Post office. Maybe it can become a community art and cultural center? Services - Utility, Sewer and Water to areas that are beyond city limits This is a sticky subject for Ukiah but a huge opportunity if curated properly. Since CA is embracing cannabis and things are changing, explore teaming up with established medical centers or the UC school system such as the Berkeley Cannabis Research Center or other campuses with medical centers to study and explore the medicinal uses for Cannabis and CBD. Most of the reputable schools already have started to explore this area of study. We are perfectly located in close proximity to farms already. Why not capitalize on this and attract a medical facility? Take it all out of the dark and capitalize on the positive health aspects. Is it possible to consolidate things like the locations of medical offices? Would this help free up former residential buildings? Will this make it easier for people to access medical care support more nature engagement opportunities for youth The Airport Business Park seems to be thriving. There is an opportunity there to direct some of those revenues to the downtown to beautify it and promote the development of housing there. I hear from many retired Ukiahans who want to sell their homes and exchange them for condos that are walkable to downtown amenities. The opportunity is there, though I'm not sure what role government has here beyond trying to promote and incentivize development. Seems like the private sector needs to take off. Rooftops: valuable space for energy efficiency and innovation, i.e. solar and rooftop gardens (would also be great event space) Increased support for trails, bike lanes, and other urban outdoor activities Using our climate to our advantage, by using solar to become more energy independent (mitigates issues with PSPS) Page 203 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 38 of 39 Identified Opportunities Support true local businesses Require that any significant tree eliminated/lumbered/forested within the city that over 12 inches in diameter must first be approved, and then be replaced somewhere in the city. Our upcoming road diet! Maybe people will be able to compete with the fast and furious traffic of State st. Revised the UCC. Code should encourage and allow uses that the city wants and discourage land uses the city wants to avoid. Code is dated Does the current layout of our streets work? Could improvements be made? Could some streets be extended or altered to make them work better (i.e. taking Hospital Drive straight through to Clara, thus eliminating the dangerously sharp turn) If we could only get that train moving again to bring more people and even commuters here to boost the economy. Sonoma is doing it! support holistic health - diet, exercise, environment, balanced lifestyle Events: I really love the diversity and engagement in public events downtown-- keep up the great work for the next 20 years! Bring back Neighborhood watch programs Increase Mendocino County wine brand awareness Creating places for families and kids Increasing community participation to develop a determined effort to increase school properties and educational achievements. Better interactive website. Including GIS look up, code look up. Search feature is broken. Page 204 of 585 Community Outreach Summary 2019 January 2020 Page 39 of 39 Vision Key Term Identification Online exercises also included a variation on the Visioning Exercise from both Community Workshop #1 and PumpkinFest. The online exercise asked participants to select which adjectives, values, and assets described Ukiah 2040 as part of the following Vision Statement. The results of this exercise are attached. Ukiah 2040 General Plan Visioning Exercise Ukiah is a/an [adjective] _______________ community that is built on [3 values] ________________, ________________, and ________________. We are proud to live in a city with a/an [adjective] _______________ [3 assets]________________, and ________________, ________________. Page 205 of 585 Q1. What word would you select for ADJECTIVE #1? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el ADJETIVO #1? (seleccione uno) 9 answers Q2. Other/Otro (Adjective #1/Adjetivo #1): 3 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses bikeable, vibrant and business-friendly Caring Ukiah should be a attractive and unique town that draw tourists from all over the world, It should support a vibrant community of family oriented people to come and live here. Ukiah uniquely has the city of ten thousands Buddhas which can be a major draw for more people to come and practice meditation. Q3. What word would you select for VALUE #1? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el VALOR #1? (seleccione uno) 10 answers Changing/cambiando: 1Changing/cambiando: 1Changing/cambiando: 1 Friendly/amistoso: 2Friendly/amistoso: 2Friendly/amistoso: 2 Diverse/diverso: 1Diverse/diverso: 1Diverse/diverso: 1 Unique/único: 3Unique/único: 3Unique/único: 3 Welcoming/acogedor: 2Welcoming/acogedor: 2Welcoming/acogedor: 2 Family-oriented/orientado a la familia: 1Family-oriented/orientado a la familia: 1Family-oriented/orientado a la familia: 1 Engaging/contratarando: 3Engaging/contratarando: 3Engaging/contratarando: 3 Close-knit/muy unido: 1Close-knit/muy unido: 1Close-knit/muy unido: 1 Walkable/transitable: 1Walkable/transitable: 1Walkable/transitable: 1 Bikeable/transporte de bicicleta: 1Bikeable/transporte de bicicleta: 1Bikeable/transporte de bicicleta: 1 Vibrant/vibrante: 2Vibrant/vibrante: 2Vibrant/vibrante: 2 Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios: 1Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios: 1Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios: 1 Proactive/proactivo: 0Proactive/proactivo: 0Proactive/proactivo: 0 Transparent/transparente: 0Transparent/transparente: 0Transparent/transparente: 0 Changing/cambiando Friendly/amistoso Diverse/diverso Unique/único Welcoming/acogedor Family-oriented/orientado a la familia Engaging/contratarando Close-knit/muy unido Walkable/transitable Bikeable/transporte de bicicleta Vibrant/vibrante Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios Proactive/proactivo Transparent/transparente Sustainable/sostenible Resilient/la resistencia Page 206 of 585 Q4. Other/Otro (Value #1/Valor #1): 1 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses Having a diverse and highly educated people to move here could transform the city into a unique place. I believe Ukiah could be the next Loma Linda, a healthy retirement community with vibrant healthcare and fun place to live Q5. What word would you select for VALUE #2? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el VALOR #2? (seleccione uno) 10 answers Q6. Other/Otro (Value #2/Valor #2): 1 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses health, collaboration and entrepreneurship too Q7. What word would you select for VALUE #3? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el VALOR #3? (seleccione uno) 9 answers Safety/la seguridad: 1Safety/la seguridad: 1Safety/la seguridad: 1 Trust/confiar: 0Trust/confiar: 0Trust/confiar: 0 Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 3Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 3Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 3 Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 3Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 3Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 3 Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0 Collaboration/colaboración: 1Collaboration/colaboración: 1Collaboration/colaboración: 1Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1 Creativity/creatividad: 2Creativity/creatividad: 2Creativity/creatividad: 2 Education/educación: 1Education/educación: 1Education/educación: 1 Fun/divertido: 0Fun/divertido: 0Fun/divertido: 0 Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento: 0Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento: 0Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento: 0 Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 4Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 4Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 4 Resiliency/resistencia: 0Resiliency/resistencia: 0Resiliency/resistencia: 0 Safety/la seguridad Trust/confiar Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad Inclusiveness/inclusividad Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición Collaboration/colaboración Health/salud Fiscal Responsibility/responsabilidad fiscal Community Participation/participación comunitaria Creativity/creatividad Social Equity/igualdad social Education/educación Fun/divertido Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento Transparent Local Government/gobierno local transparente Sustainability/sustentabilidad Resiliency/resistencia Safety/la seguridad: 1Safety/la seguridad: 1Safety/la seguridad: 1 Trust/confiar: 0Trust/confiar: 0Trust/confiar: 0 Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 2Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 2Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 2 Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 1Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 1Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 1 Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0 Collaboration/colaboración: 0Collaboration/colaboración: 0Collaboration/colaboración: 0 Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1 Creativity/creatividad: 1Creativity/creatividad: 1Creativity/creatividad: 1Education/educación: 1Education/educación: 1Education/educación: 1 Fun/divertido: 1Fun/divertido: 1Fun/divertido: 1 Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento: 0Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento: 0Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento: 0 Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 3Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 3Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 3 Resiliency/resistencia: 2Resiliency/resistencia: 2Resiliency/resistencia: 2 Safety/la seguridad Trust/confiar Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad Inclusiveness/inclusividad Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición Collaboration/colaboración Health/salud Fiscal Responsibility/responsabilidad fiscal Community Participation/participación comunitaria Creativity/creatividad Social Equity/igualdad social Education/educación Fun/divertido Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento Transparent Local Government/gobierno local transparente Sustainability/sustentabilidad Resiliency/resistencia Page 207 of 585 Q8. Other/Otro (Value #3/Valor #3): 1 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses education, resilency and fun Q9. What word would you select for ADJECTIVE #2? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el ADJETIVO #2? (seleccione uno) 9 answers Q10. Other/Otro (Adjective #2/Adjetivo #2): 1 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses Safe Q11. What word would you select for ASSET #1? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el ACTIVO #1? (seleccione uno) 9 answers Safety/la seguridad: 0Safety/la seguridad: 0Safety/la seguridad: 0 Trust/confiar: 0Trust/confiar: 0Trust/confiar: 0 Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 1Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 1Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad: 1 Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 1Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 1Inclusiveness/inclusividad: 1 Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición: 0 Health/salud: 1Health/salud: 1Health/salud: 1 Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1Community Participation/participación comunitaria: 1 Creativity/creatividad: 4Creativity/creatividad: 4Creativity/creatividad: 4 Education/educación: 1Education/educación: 1Education/educación: 1 Transparent Local Government/gobierno local transparente: 1Transparent Local Government/gobierno local transparente: 1Transparent Local Government/gobierno local transparente: 1 Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 0Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 0Sustainability/sustentabilidad: 0 Resiliency/resistencia: 0Resiliency/resistencia: 0Resiliency/resistencia: 0 Safety/la seguridad Trust/confiar Sense of Community/sentido de comunidad Inclusiveness/inclusividad Sense of Heritage and Tradition/sentido del patrimonio y la tradición Collaboration/colaboración Health/salud Fiscal Responsibility/responsabilidad fiscal Community Participation/participación comunitaria Creativity/creatividad Social Equity/igualdad social Education/educación Fun/divertido Entrepreneurship/emprendimiento Transparent Local Government/gobierno local transparente Sustainability/sustentabilidad Resiliency/resistencia Changing/cambiando: 0Changing/cambiando: 0Changing/cambiando: 0 Friendly/amistoso: 1Friendly/amistoso: 1Friendly/amistoso: 1 Diverse/diverso: 1Diverse/diverso: 1Diverse/diverso: 1 Unique/único: 1Unique/único: 1Unique/único: 1 Welcoming/acogedor: 1Welcoming/acogedor: 1Welcoming/acogedor: 1 Family-oriented/orientado a la familia: 1Family-oriented/orientado a la familia: 1Family-oriented/orientado a la familia: 1 Engaging/contratarando: 1Engaging/contratarando: 1Engaging/contratarando: 1 Walkable/transitable: 2Walkable/transitable: 2Walkable/transitable: 2 Vibrant/vibrante: 1Vibrant/vibrante: 1Vibrant/vibrante: 1 Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios: 1Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios: 1Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios: 1 Proactive/proactivo: 1Proactive/proactivo: 1Proactive/proactivo: 1 Transparent/transparente: 0Transparent/transparente: 0Transparent/transparente: 0 Sustainable/sostenible: 0Sustainable/sostenible: 0Sustainable/sostenible: 0 Changing/cambiando Friendly/amistoso Diverse/diverso Unique/único Welcoming/acogedor Family-oriented/orientado a la familia Engaging/contratarando Close-knit/muy unido Walkable/transitable Bikeable/transporte de bicicleta Vibrant/vibrante Business-friendly/favorable a los negocios Proactive/proactivo Transparent/transparente Sustainable/sostenible Resilient/la resistencia Page 208 of 585 Q12. Other/Otro (Asset #1/Activo #1): 1 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses schools and parks Q13. What word would you select for ASSET #2? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el ACTIVO #2? (seleccione uno) 10 answers Q14. Other/Otro (Asset #2/Activo #2): 0 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses Q15. What word would you select for ASSET #3? (select one) / ¿Qué palabra seleccionarías para el ACTIVO #3? (seleccione uno) 10 answers Open Space/espacio abierto: 1Open Space/espacio abierto: 1Open Space/espacio abierto: 1 Parks/parques: 1Parks/parques: 1Parks/parques: 1 Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 4Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 4Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 4Historic Resources/recursos históricos: 0Historic Resources/recursos históricos: 0Historic Resources/recursos históricos: 0 Airport/aeropuerto: 0Airport/aeropuerto: 0Airport/aeropuerto: 0 Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 2Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 2Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 2 Trails/caminos: 1Trails/caminos: 1Trails/caminos: 1 Downtown/céntrico: 1Downtown/céntrico: 1Downtown/céntrico: 1 Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 0Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 0Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 0 Social Services/servicios sociales: 1Social Services/servicios sociales: 1Social Services/servicios sociales: 1 Open Space/espacio abierto Parks/parques Natural Resources/recursos naturales Historic Resources/recursos históricos Airport/aeropuerto Community Events/eventos comunitarios Civic Facilities/instalaciones cívicas Hillsides/laderas Neighborhoods/los vecindarios Highway 101/Carretera 101 Location/la localización Schools/escuelas Community College/colegio comunitario Shopping/compras Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación Trails/caminos Downtown/céntrico Economic Diversity/diversidad económica Social Services/servicios sociales Open Space/espacio abierto: 2Open Space/espacio abierto: 2Open Space/espacio abierto: 2 Parks/parques: 3Parks/parques: 3Parks/parques: 3 Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 1Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 1Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 1 Airport/aeropuerto: 1Airport/aeropuerto: 1Airport/aeropuerto: 1 Community Events/eventos comunitarios: 2Community Events/eventos comunitarios: 2Community Events/eventos comunitarios: 2 Community College/colegio comunitario: 1Community College/colegio comunitario: 1Community College/colegio comunitario: 1 Shopping/compras: 1Shopping/compras: 1Shopping/compras: 1 Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 1Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 1Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 1 Trails/caminos: 1Trails/caminos: 1Trails/caminos: 1 Downtown/céntrico: 0Downtown/céntrico: 0Downtown/céntrico: 0 Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 2Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 2Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 2 Social Services/servicios sociales: 1Social Services/servicios sociales: 1Social Services/servicios sociales: 1 Open Space/espacio abierto Parks/parques Natural Resources/recursos naturales Historic Resources/recursos históricos Airport/aeropuerto Community Events/eventos comunitarios Civic Facilities/instalaciones cívicas Hillsides/laderas Neighborhoods/los vecindarios Highway 101/Carretera 101 Location/la localización Schools/escuelas Community College/colegio comunitario Shopping/compras Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación Trails/caminos Downtown/céntrico Economic Diversity/diversidad económica Social Services/servicios sociales Page 209 of 585 Q16. Other/Otro (Asset #3/Activo #3): 2 answers Word Cloud Response List Responses Also, schools, community college recreation opportunities including trails and historic resources Open Space/espacio abierto: 1Open Space/espacio abierto: 1Open Space/espacio abierto: 1 Parks/parques: 2Parks/parques: 2Parks/parques: 2 Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 1Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 1Natural Resources/recursos naturales: 1 Airport/aeropuerto: 1Airport/aeropuerto: 1Airport/aeropuerto: 1 Community Events/eventos comunitarios: 2Community Events/eventos comunitarios: 2Community Events/eventos comunitarios: 2 Civic Facilities/instalaciones cívicas: 1Civic Facilities/instalaciones cívicas: 1Civic Facilities/instalaciones cívicas: 1 Neighborhoods/los vecindarios: 2Neighborhoods/los vecindarios: 2Neighborhoods/los vecindarios: 2Location/la localización: 1Location/la localización: 1Location/la localización: 1 Community College/colegio comunitario: 2Community College/colegio comunitario: 2Community College/colegio comunitario: 2 Shopping/compras: 1Shopping/compras: 1Shopping/compras: 1 Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 0Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 0Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación: 0 Downtown/céntrico: 1Downtown/céntrico: 1Downtown/céntrico: 1 Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 3Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 3Economic Diversity/diversidad económica: 3 Social Services/servicios sociales: 0Social Services/servicios sociales: 0Social Services/servicios sociales: 0 Open Space/espacio abierto Parks/parques Natural Resources/recursos naturales Historic Resources/recursos históricos Airport/aeropuerto Community Events/eventos comunitarios Civic Facilities/instalaciones cívicas Hillsides/laderas Neighborhoods/los vecindarios Highway 101/Carretera 101 Location/la localización Schools/escuelas Community College/colegio comunitario Shopping/compras Recreation Opportunities/oportunidades de recreación Trails/caminos Downtown/céntrico Economic Diversity/diversidad económica Social Services/servicios sociales Page 210 of 585 Draft General Plan Vision Statements January 2020 January 2020 Page 1 of 1 Draft General Plan Vision Statements The following are four draft General Plan Vision Statements that were developed based on key terms used by community members to express their vision of Ukiah in 2040. The GREEN highlighted words in each Vision Statement are the community’s key terms, as identified at Community Workshop #1, PumpkinFest, and through online engagement. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #1 The City of Ukiah will be an engaging city that prioritizes being a connected community built on a foundation of active public participation and maintaining a transparent local government. We will strive to enhance overall connectivity in the City by encouraging a more bikeable and walkable environment. We will continue to promote lifelong learning and education excellence and accessibility for all age groups. Ukiah will be a city that values economic diversity in a business-friendly environment. Overall, we aspire to be a resilient community, one that is fiscally responsible, environmentally conscious, and sustainably focused. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #2 Ukiah will be a welcoming and diverse city that values and promotes community safety, education, and overall community health. The city will continue to maintain and enhance its local parks and support community events that are inclusive. Ukiah will be a sustainable community focusing on resiliency and protection of our natural environment. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #3 The City of Ukiah will be a proactive and vibrant community that prides itself on diversity, safety, and transparency for all community members. We will protect our natural resources by encouraging sustainably focused development and resilient infrastructure that enhances the community while preserving valuable open space. We will seek to be a leader in the region by providing social services and economic and recreation opportunities that benefit everyone and celebrate Ukiah as a unique place to live and visit. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #4 The City of Ukiah is a diverse, family-oriented, and friendly community that is connected to the beautiful, surrounding natural open space areas that give the community its unique focus and sense of place. Ukiah is a resilient community that is fiscally responsible, environmentally conscious, and inclusive. The city offers a great place for people of all ages, incomes, and ethnicities to live, work, and visit. Attachment 2 Page 211 of 585 MARCH 2020 CITY OF UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATEEXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK Attachment 3 Page 212 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOKii This page is intentionally left blank. Page 213 of 585 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents 1. Introduction ......................................1 What is in a General Plan? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 What is the Difference between the General Plan and Zoning? 3 Why Should We Update the General Plan? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Notable New State Laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Regional Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Planning Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 2. Demographics .................................11 Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Race/Ethnicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 3. Economics & Economy .....................17 Employment and Existing Jobs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Major Employers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 Recent Job Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Projected Job Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 4. Land Use ........................................23 Notable Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 Existing (1995) General Plan Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Existing Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 Land Available for Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 Other Notable City of Ukiah Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Regional Planning Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 5. Housing ..........................................43 Housing Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44 Vacancy Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45 Housing Mix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46 Age of Housing Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Homeownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Housing Prices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48 Housing Affordability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48 Overcrowding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 Homeless Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 6. Transportation & Circulation ............51 Roadways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55 Travel Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56 Active Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 Aviation Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 7. Public Facilities, Services, & Infrastructure .................................61 Overview of Public Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62 City Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63 Law Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63 Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Response . . . . . . . .63 Healthcare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64 Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64 Library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities . . . . . . . . . . . .68 iii Page 214 of 585 8. Open Space, Parks, & Recreation ......73 Open Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74 Parks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76 Recreation Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79 9. Environment ...................................81 Water Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82 Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Biological Habitat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 10. Hazards & Safety ...........................87 Earthquakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88 Wildfire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90 Droughts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Extreme Heat Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92 Flooding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92 Resiliency Efforts in Ukiah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOKiv Page 215 of 585 FIGURES AND TABLES Figures Figure 1-1: Relationship Between the Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Figure 1-2: Sample Changes to Address in the Update . . . . . .4 Figure 1-3: Regional Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Figure 2-1: Ukiah Population, 2010 to 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 Figure 2-2: Population by Age, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Figure 2-3: Population by Race/Ethnicity, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . .14 Figure 2-4: Primary Language, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Figure 3-1: Ukiah Residents, Employment by Industry, 2017 .18 Figure 3-2: Median Household Income, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Figure 3-3: Revenue from Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Figure 4-1: Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 Figure 4-2: Existing Land Use Breakdown, City of Ukiah . . . .26 Figure 4-3: Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 Figure 4-4: Existing General Plan Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 Figure 4-5: Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 Figure 4-6: Downtown-Specific Zoning Districts . . . . . . . . . .33 Figure 4-7: Vacant Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35 Figure 4-8: Underutilized Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 Figure 4-9: Airport Compatibility Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 Figure 4-10: Planning Area, Ukiah Valley Area Plan . . . . . . .40 Figure 5-1: New Housing Construction Starts . . . . . . . . . . . .44 Figure 5-2: Vacancy Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45 Figure 5-3: Housing Units by Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46 Figure 5-4: Year Housing Structures Built . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Figure 5-5: Home Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Figure 6-1: Roadway Classifications, Planning Area . . . . . . .53 Figure 6-2: Roadway Classifications, City of Ukiah . . . . . . . .54 Figure 6-3: State Highway and Local Road VMT, 2001-2017 .55 Figure 6-4: State Highway and Local Road VMT Per Capita, . . Ukiah, 2001-2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55 Figure 6-5: Commute Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56 Figure 6-6: Commute Mode Share, 1980-2017 . . . . . . . . . . .56 Figure 6-7: Commuting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57 Figure 6-8: Jobs by Distance and Direction, 2017 . . . . . . . . .57 Figure 6-9: Walking and Biking as a Means of Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 Figure 7-1: Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65 Figure 7-2: Additional Ukiah Unified schools . . . . . . . . . . . . .66 Figure 7-3: Low Income AreasWithin the Planning Area . . . .69 Figure 7-4: DUCs South of Ukiah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70 Figure 7-5: DUCs North of Ukiah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71 Figure 8-1: Open Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75 Figure 8-2: Parks and Recreation Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77 Figure 9-1: Russian River Riparian Plant Species . . . . . . . . .84 Figure 10-1: Seismic Hazard Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89 Figure 10-2: Fire Hazard Severity Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91 Figure 10-3: Flood Hazard Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93 Tables Table 3-1: Ukiah Residents, Jobs by Type of Worker, 2017 . .18 Table 3-2: Major Employers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 Table 3-3: Jobs and Wage Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Table 3-4: Revenues, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 Table 4-1: Existing Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32 Table 4-2: Vacant Land by Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 Table 4-3: Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones . . . . . . . . .39 Table 5-1: Overpaying Households by Tenure . . . . . . . . . . . .48 Table 5-2: Overcrowded Households by Tenure . . . . . . . . . .49 Table 6-1: Jobs by Distance, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57 Table 7-1: Crimes by Type, 2016-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63 Table 7-2: Identified Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68 Table 8-1: Parks and Recreation Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76 v Page 216 of 585 Page 217 of 585 Urban planning is a technical and political process that communities use to guide orderly development and resource allocation. In 1971, the State made it mandatory for every city and county to adopt a general plan and required that local land use approvals be consistent with the adopted general plan. Ukiah’s current General Plan was adopted in 1995. After 24 years, it is time to revisit the General Plan to ensure that the policy direction for the future is representative of current community values and is responsive to the changes of the next decade and beyond. The Existing Conditions Workbook is a snapshot of Ukiah in 2019, prior to the Covid-19 Pandemic of 2020. While this is a snapshot of 2019, some data may be older based on availability of information. This section provides an overview of the Ukiah General Plan process, why it is prepared, and why it is important. 1. INTRODUCTION 11. INTRODUCTION // Page 218 of 585 What is in a General Plan? A general plan represents the community’s aspiration for its future and establishes the local government’s long-term framework for future growth and development. The general plan contains the goals and polices upon which the City Council and Planning Commission will base their land use and resource decisions. Typically, a general plan is designed to address the issues facing the city for the next 20 years. The general plan is made up of a collection of “elements,” or topics. There are currently nine mandatory elements: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, safety, environmental justice, and air quality. Communities can include other elements that address issues of local concern, such as economic development, community character, or urban design. Communities can also organize their general plan anyway they choose, as long as they address each of the required elements. A general plan has three defining features: General – Provides general policy guidance for future land use and resource decisions. Comprehensive – Covers a broad range of topics, including land use, housing, economic development, infrastructure, public safety, recreation, and natural resources. Long-Range – Provides guidance for achieving a future envisioned 20 or more years into the future. What is the Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook? This workbook tells the story of Ukiah – where it has been, where it is today, and the trends that will shape its future. This workbook focuses on providing the foundational information about the physical, natural, cultural, and economic conditions and trends that sets the stage for updating the General Plan. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK2 Page 219 of 585 What is the Difference between the General Plan and Zoning? A general plan is distinct from zoning. Although both the general plan and the zoning ordinance designate how land may be developed, they do so in different ways. A general plan has a broad, long-term outlook that identifies the types of development that will be allowed, the spatial relationships among land uses, and the general pattern of future development. A zoning ordinance regulates development through specific standards such as lot size, building setbacks, height, and allowable uses. Under State law, all planning documents maintained, prepared, or approved must be found to be consistent with the adopted general plan for the jurisdiction. This relationship is illustrated on Figure 1-1. For land use, zoning is a key tool used to implement a general plan. Zoning supports implementation of the general plan and, therefore, must be consistent with the general plan. Upon adoption of the updated general plan, a jurisdiction may need to amend the zoning ordinance and zoning map to ensure consistency with the adopted general plan. Development projects must not only meet the specific requirements of the zoning ordinance, but also the broader policies set forth in the general plan. General Plan MORE GENERALLONGER TERM MORE DETAILEDSHORTER TERM Specific Plan Zoning Building Permits FIGURE 1-1: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PLANS 31. INTRODUCTION // Page 220 of 585 Why Should We Update the General Plan? Because the City’s current General Plan is more than two decades old, there are a number of concerns that must be addressed through this update (Figure 1-2 and below): • To meaningfully engage the community. The General Plan is a pivotal opportunity to bring the community together to learn and collaborate to define a common vision and priorities for the future. • To address major changes from the past two decades and prepare for shifts on the horizon. • To address new State laws (see next page for details). Social and demographic changes • Increasing diversity • Changing needs and behaviors • Growing population and the need for more housing Technological changes • Autonomous vehicles • Ride-, car-, bike-, and scooter- sharing • Smart phones Economic shifts • Rise of internet commerce and reduction in “brick and mortar” stores • Focus on specialty knowledge-based industries, compared to manual trades Global issues • Climate change • Adaptation, resiliency, and mitigation FIGURE 1-2: SAMPLE CHANGES TO ADDRESS IN THE UPDATE // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK4 Page 221 of 585 ASSEMBLY BILL (AB) 32 (2006) AND SENATE BILL (SB) 32 (2017) • To reduce statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 • To reduce statewide GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 CALIFORNIA COMPLETE STREETS ACT (2008) • To accommodate all forms of transportation, including the needs of all non- motorized travelers, through planning, maintenance, and improvements AB 379 (2008) • To address climate change adaptation and resilience SB 244 (2011) • SB 244 requires cities and counties to address the infrastructure needs of unincorporated disadvantaged communities in city and county general plans SB 743 (2013) • To use vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the metric to evaluate environmental impacts to more appropriately balance congestion management with infill development, active transportation, and GHG emissions reduction AB 52 (2014) • To identify and minimize substantial adverse change(s) to significant tribal cultural resources during the CEQA analysis SB 1000 (2016) • To identify disadvantaged communities and develop measures to reduce health risks and to promote civic engagement in the public decision-making process CALIFORNIA 2017 HOUSING PACKAGE • To streamline housing development • To provide State financial incentives for housing production CALIFORNIA 2019 HOUSING LEGISLATION • To further streamline permitting and approval processes and limit fees for housing production • To facilitate the development of more accessory dwelling units by removing barriers to approval and construction Notable New State Laws 51. INTRODUCTION // Page 222 of 585 History Ukiah was incorporated into a city more than 140 years ago, and has existed as a distinct community for more than 160 years. The history of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley, and the people who lived here, goes back even further. As Ukiah plans for the future, it is critical to understand the past to help guide the future of the community. Settlement and Early Growth, 1850-1920 Western settlers first settled in Ukiah in the mid-19th century. In 1859, Ukiah was designated the seat of Mendocino County and was incorporated in 1876. During Ukiah’s early history, the slow-growing city remained relatively isolated. In 1889, the railroad was extended to Ukiah and the city became more accessible to the region and country. Ukiah’s prime soils and climate supported farming and agricultural opportunities, which became a dominant economic driver for the city. The dominant crop during the early settlement period of the city was hops. 1845 1854 1856 1859 1858 1876 Governor of Alta California, Pío Pico, gave Rancho Yokaya to Cayetano Juárez Vichy Springs opens Ukiah is incorporated as a city Samuel Lowry builds a log cabin at what is now the corner of East Perkins Street and North Main Street The first U.S. Post Office in Ukiah opens Mendocino County designates Ukiah as county seat Pomo People, Initial Settlement-1850 Before western settlement, the Ukiah Valley and much of what is now Mendocino County, was inhabited by the Pomo people. Known for their intricate woven baskets, the Pomo primarily lived in small groups and relied on hunting, fishing, and foraging. With the arrival of western settlers, the Pomo were driven off their land, their population dropped dramatically, and they were eventually forced onto reservations. Today, there are three small reservations, called rancherias, in the Ukiah Valley that are home to groups of Pomo. The name “Ukiah” draws from the history of the Pomo people. Ukiah is an anglicized version of the Pomo word yokaya, meaning “deep valley.” HISTORIC TIMELINE // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK6 Page 223 of 585 The Growth Years, 1920-1960 Ukiah remained relatively small and slow growing until the 1920s. In the following decades, especially after the end of World War II, the city grew rapidly. This growth coincided with the growth of the logging industry in California’s northern coasts. The redwood forests to the north of Ukiah became extremely valuable for lumber, and the logging industry in the area grew rapidly supporting an increase in employment and growth in the region. Today Since the early 20th century, the logging industry has been on a steady decline along the northern coast and other industries have emerged. In 2020, Ukiah is the county seat and largest city in Mendocino County. With both City of Ukiah and County administrative offices within the city, Ukiah boasts a large number of public sector employment opportunities, particularly in education and social services. Outside the public sector, the city is known for strong retail and service industries and a bustling tourism industry catering to travelers and adventurers looking to explore the Valley. Additionally, the city is surrounded by mineral rich agricultural lands capable of supporting viticulture operations. In recent years the region has seen an increase in local vineyards opening adjacent to the city. The increase in local wine production and processing reflects the increasing popularity of the Ukiah Valley as a wine region and destination. 1920s Ukiah begins to grow more rapidly, growing by 35 percent in a decade 1889 The San Francisco and North Pacific Railroad reaches Ukiah 1944 A fire destroys the historic Chris Norgard block of downtown Ukiah 1974 The City of Ten Thousand Buddhas, a Buddhist temple complex, is completed in neighboring Talmage 1986 The Grace Hudson Museum opens 1940s and 1950s The redwood logging industry booms, and Ukiah grows 71. INTRODUCTION // Page 224 of 585 Planning Area As an important regional center in Mendocino County, the City of Ukiah designed the existing (1995) general plan as an areawide plan with a Planning Area encompassing the Ukiah Valley. The resulting Ukiah Valley General Plan (UVGP) included the city of Ukiah; the communities of Calpella, Talmage, The Forks, Vichy Springs, Presswood, Regina Heights, and El Roble; and goals, policies, and programs that reflected a valleywide approach. Following this effort, Mendocino County took the lead in valleywide planning. Working with the City of Ukiah, the County adopted the Ukiah Valley Area Plan (UVAP) in 2011 with the same Planning Area boundary as the previous UVGP, shown below. With the County heading long-range planning efforts in the valley, the City of Ukiah may consider contracting the Planning Area in order to refocus the general plan on the incorporated areas of the city and areas likely to be developed or annexed by 2040. Boundary used for: 1995 UVGP(City of Ukiah) and 2011 UVAP(Mendocino County) Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Lake Men d o c i n o Ukiah 222 253 Regional Setting Located 45 miles north of Healdsburg and 155 miles south of Eureka, the City of Ukiah spans more than 3,000 acres (4.6 square miles). The city is regionally significant, serving as the seat of Mendocino County and the largest city in the county. It functions as a center for commerce, recreation, medical and social services, and cultural events. The Ukiah Valley is approximately nine miles long, running north to south, comprising more than 40,000 acres along U.S. Route 101. The Russian River follows the valley, winding through agricultural lands just outside of Ukiah to the east. The valley is approximately 630 feet in elevation, with the hills of the Mendocino and Mayacamas ranges that flank the valley reaching up to 3,000 feet in elevation. The nearest major city to Ukiah is Santa Rosa, a city of 175,000, which is located approximately 60 miles to the south. Larger urban centers including San Francisco and Sacramento are approximately 100 miles to the south and southeast. Ukiah’s relative isolation from major population centers increases its importance as a regional center. Closer to Ukiah, there are several small unincorporated communities in the Ukiah Valley, as well as in the neighboring Redwood Valley to the north. Figure 1-3 shows Ukiah's location in the region. In 2019, the region surrounding Ukiah is best known for its natural and scenic beauty. Once called the “Gateway to the Redwoods,” the city is a short drive from some of the largest redwood forests in California, protected in parks like Montgomery Woods and the sprawling Jackson State Forest. These massive trees grow natively in the city and on the hills above the valley.WHY IS THE PLANNING AREA IMPORTANT? Although the County has legal land use authority over unincorporated areas of the county, the City of Ukiah provides some services outside city limits but within the Planning Area. As part of the General Plan, the City must evaluate current services in these areas and analyze the feasibility of future services. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK8 Page 225 of 585 MENDOCINO COUNTY TRINITY COUNTY TEHAMA COUNTY HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHASTA COUNTY LAKE COUNTY GLENN COUNTY SONOMA COUNTY COLUSA COUNTY NAPA COUNTY YOLO COUNTY UV1 UV20 UV128 UV12 UV116 UV273 UV16 UV96 UV45 UV162 UV3 UV29 UV299 UV36 UV253 UV32 UV151 UV211 UV175 UV254 UV271 UV221 UV53 UV255 UV175 UV29 UV128 UV162 UV128 UV299 City of Ukiah City Limits City of Ukiah Planning Area §¨¦101 §¨¦5 §¨¦80 §¨¦505 §¨¦505 §¨¦5 Chico Ukiah Eureka Arcata Redding Windsor Fortuna Petaluma Red Bluff Healdsburg Rohnert Park McKinleyville Napa Dixon Vacaville Fairfield Clearlake Santa Rosa Suisun City FIGURE 1-3: REGIONAL SETTING 91. INTRODUCTION // Page 226 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK10 Page 227 of 585 2. DEMOGRAPHICS This Demographics section includes an overview of Ukiah’s population and provides a look at the distribution of that population by age and race/ethnicity. Information on employment and income can be found in Section 3, Economics and Economy. Having an understanding of the makeup of the population will support Ukiah in better gauging the needs of its residents. Approximately 16,000 people call Ukiah home. Over the last few decades, Ukiah has become younger and more diverse. As the community looks to the future, Ukiah must evolve to meet the needs of its residents, both current and future. 112. DEMOGRAPHICS // Page 228 of 585 Po p u l a t i o n Year 15,000 16,000 17,000 2019201820172016201520142013201220112010 16,07 5 15,90 6 15,98 0 16,04 8 16,01 2 15,98 2 16,03 4 16,08 7 16,36 8 16,29 6 Population Over the past several years, Ukiah’s population has remained relatively static, hovering around 16,000 residents (Figure 2-1). As of the 2010 U.S. Census, Ukiah had 16,075 residents. In the following years, the estimated population dipped just below 16,000, before growing to an estimated population of 16,296 in 2019. Although population growth projections specific to Ukiah are unavailable, the California Department of Finance estimates that Mendocino County as a whole will grow by six percent by 2040, or an average rate of 0.3 percent annually. Between 2010 and 2019, Ukiah grew at a rate of 0.15 percent annually. If the city were to continue to grow at this rate, it would see about just over three percent growth by 2040. FIGURE 2-1: UKIAH POPULATION, 2010 TO 2019 POPULATION 16,296 MEDIAN AGE 34.8 Source: California Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates, 2019; 2013-2017 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates. Source: California Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates, 2019. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK12 Page 229 of 585 Age Ukiah has a population that, overall, is decreasing in age. The median age, based on 2017 American Community Survey estimates, is 34.8 years old, down from 35.9 in 2010. Much of this change is due to an increased percentage of young adults between 25 and 35 in the city, indicating that young families are moving to Ukiah. This is a major divergence from countywide trends, which suggest, on average, a much older and increasingly aging population. The median age in the county in 2010 was 41.5 years old; in 2017 the median age was 42.4 years old. Ukiah also has a high percentage of working age residents between 25 and 54, which combine to make up nearly 42 percent of the population, as shown in Figure 2-2. FIGURE 2-2: POPULATION BY AGE, 2017 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 85 + 75 - 8 4 65 - 7 4 60 - 6 4 55 - 5 9 50 - 5 4 45 - 4 9 40 - 4 5 25 - 2 9 30 - 3 4 35 - 3 9 20 - 2 4 15 - 1 9 10 - 1 4 5 - 9 0 - 5 Age 7.1%7.3%6.3%6.8%6.4% 8.2%8.2% 5.7%5.7%7.0%7.0% 5.2%5.2% 7.7% 3.5%2.8% 41.7% 33.9%24.4% Note: Data for ages 25-54 are only provided in ten year increments. Totals have been split into five year increments for comparison. Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 132. DEMOGRAPHICS // Page 230 of 585 Race/Ethnicity As shown in Figure 2-3, Ukiah’s racial demographic is mixed. While a majority of the population identifies as White (57.3 percent), nearly a third of the population identifies as Hispanic or Latino (32.7 percent). This differs from Mendocino County as a whole where just 24.5 percent of the population identifies as Hispanic or Latino. Approximately 30 percent of Ukiah residents speak a primary language other than English. Countywide, only about 22 percent of residents speak a primary language other than English. This comparison is illustrated in Figure 2-4. Two or More Races Other Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Asian American Indian and Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino White 1.1% 1.3% 1.3% 0.4% 0.6% 5.3% 57.3%32.7% Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. FIGURE 2-3: POPULATION BY RACE/ ETHNICITY, 2017 FIGURE 2-4: PRIMARY LANGUAGE, 2017 Ukiah Mendocino County 30% 22% 70% 78% E nglish Other Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK14 Page 231 of 585 152. DEMOGRAPHICS // Page 232 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK16 Page 233 of 585 3. ECONOMICS & ECONOMY Strong fiscal health is essential to providing a high level of public services and community amenities, which also contribute significantly to the quality of life. Economic conditions in the private sector are an indicator of existing trends and point toward shifts in the local economy. This section describes the current fiscal and economic development conditions in the city, including employment and existing jobs, major employers, job growth, income, and tax revenue. 173. ECONOMICS & ECONOMY // Page 234 of 585 Employment and Existing Jobs Ukiah had approximately 6,700 residents employed in the labor force in 2017. Figure 3-1 provides a breakdown of Ukiah's workforce by industry. Residents of Ukiah are most commonly employed in education and healthcare, or in jobs related to retail or arts, tourism, recreation and food service. The unemployment rate in Ukiah was 8.7 percent in 2017, considerably higher than the countywide unemployment rate of 6.1 percent. Table 3-1 shows resident jobs by type of worker. Class of Worker Total Civilian employed population 16 years and over 6,708 Private wage and salary workers 4,585 Government workers 1,480 Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers 622 Unpaid family workers 21 TABLE 3-1: UKIAH RESIDENTS, JOBS BY TYPE OF WORKER, 2017 Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. With both Ukiah and Mendocino County offices located within the city, Ukiah has the largest number of public services sector jobs in the county. Approximately 7.5 percent of the city’s residents are employed in public administration. Furthermore, as shown in Table 3-1, 1,480 (or approximately 22 percent) of the 6,708 jobs held by Ukiah residents are in government, which is comprised of public sector jobs across all industries, including public administrators, educators, public health and social workers, and professional and scientific staff. FIGURE 3-1: UKIAH RESIDENTS, EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, 2017 Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK18 Page 235 of 585 Major Employers Major employers are listed in Table 3-2 alphabetically by location. Key characteristics of these employers are as follows: • Mendocino County and the City of Ukiah are major employers in the city. • Ukiah Valley Medical Center, the largest medical center in the region, serving both the city and many of the rural communities nearby, is the largest employer in the city and within the healthcare sector. • Costco and Walmart are the largest retail employers in the city (Retail Trade Sector), collectively employing several hundred residents. • There are a number of agricultural and forestry related employers in the Ukiah Planning Area. The largest are Mendocino Forest Products, a lumber company (Manufacturing sector), and Redwood Empire Packing Inc. (Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, and Mining sector). Employer Name Industry City of Ukiah Adventist Health Ukiah Valley Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance City of Ukiah Public Administration Professional, Scientific, and Management and Administrative and Waste Management Services Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance Costco Wholesale Retail Trade Mendocino Community Health Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance Mendocino County Public Administration Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance Pacific Coast Farm Credit Finance and Insurance and Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Ukiah Unified School District Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance Ukiah Valley Medical Center Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance Walmart Retail Trade Planning Area Dharma Realm Buddhist Association Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance Mendocino County Office of Education Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance Mendocino Forest Products Manufacturing Redwood Empire Packing, Inc .Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, and Mining TABLE 3-2: MAJOR EMPLOYERS Source: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/majorer/countymajorer.asp?CountyCode=000045 193. ECONOMICS & ECONOMY // Page 236 of 585 educational services, health care, and social assistance sectors (21.5 percent); construction (18.6 percent); leisure and hospitality (13.3 percent), and farming (13.2 percent). The region's top three industries are also projected to grow. Between 2016 and 2026 EDD projects that education, health care, and social services will add 4,280 jobs, government will add 1,360 jobs, and trade, transportation, and utilities will add 1,060 jobs. Income The median household income (MHI) in Ukiah was $43,480 in 2017 (Figure 3-2). This was slightly lower than the countywide median income of $46,528 and significantly lower than the statewide median income of $67,169 in the same year. Between 2009 and 2017, incomes in Ukiah rose more steeply than in the county as a whole. During this period, the MHI in Ukiah grew at a CAGR of 1.32 percent while the MHI in Mendocino County grew at a lower CAGR of 0.87 percent. TABLE 3-3: JOBS AND WAGE SUMMARY Description Employment Median Household Income (MHI) 2009 Jobs 2017 Jobs 2009 to 2017 Job Change 2009 to 2017 Job CAGR 2009 MHI 2017 MHI 2009 to 2017 MHI Change 2009 to 2017 MHI CAGR Ukiah 6,037 6,708 671 1 .33%$39,159 $43,480 $4,321 1 .32% Mendocino County 38,188 37,084 -1,104 -0 .37%$43,404 $46,528 $3,124 0 .87% Source: 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates; 2013-2017 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates. Recent Job Growth Between 2009 and 2017, Ukiah added 671 jobs at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.33 percent (Table 3-3). This growth rate contrasts with the stagnant job growth experienced in Mendocino County (-0.37 percent CAGR) during this same period. Industries with the largest growth between 2009 and 2017 were: Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining (232 jobs added); professional, scientific, and management (201 jobs added); educational services and health care (286 jobs added) and arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food service (219 jobs added). The economic recession of 2010 caused industries related to housing construction and home purchases to shrink during this period, including construction (222 jobs lost), wholesale trade (48 jobs lost); and finance, insurance, real estate and rental and leasing (51 job lost). Projected Job Growth The California Employment Development Department provides employment growth projections for regions throughout the state. In the North Coast Region, which includes Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, and Mendocino Counties, the largest projected growth between 2016 and 2026 is in FIGURE 3-2: MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2017 Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. STATE OF CALIFORNIA $67,169 CITY OF UKIAH $43,480 $46,528 MENDOCINO COUNTY // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK20 Page 237 of 585 FY 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 FY 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5 FY 2 0 1 5 - 2 0 1 6 FY 2 0 1 6 - 2 0 1 7 FY 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 ( E S T I M A T E D ) FY 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 ( B U D G E T E D ) FY 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 1 ( P R O J E C T E D ) FY 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2 ( P R O J E C T E D ) FY 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 1 8 $1 0 , 8 5 5 , 8 6 0 $1 1 , 1 4 8 , 1 6 0 $1 1 , 9 7 1 , 4 4 5 $1 4 , 7 5 8 , 8 6 3 $1 7 , 0 3 6 , 8 2 6 $1 7 , 4 4 2 , 7 5 7 $1 9 , 2 4 0 , 7 1 7 $2 1 , 0 5 3 , 9 5 7 $2 1 , 2 3 1 , 8 4 3 AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWTH RATE: 11.43 PERCENT Source: City of Ukiah, Budget 2020; City of Ukiah Budget Story 2018; both at http://www. cityofukiah.com/finance/. FIGURE 3-3: REVENUE FROM TAXES Revenue Table 3-4 shows revenues for the City of Ukiah in 2017. In that year, the largest source of revenue for the city was in charges for service, which brought in more than $35 million and accounted for 57 percent of annual revenues. Taxes were the next largest source at 27.5 percent of revenues, followed by grants (6.0 percent) and licenses and permits (3.9 percent). Figure 3-3 shows City revenues from taxes from Financial Year 2013-2014 through FY 2021- 2022. The figure shows actual revenues for FY 2013-2018 and projections for years after this period. In Financial Year 2017-2018, the City of Ukiah received $17,036,826 in revenue from taxes. Between FY 2014-2014 and FY 2017-2018 the city's revenues for taxes grew at average rate of 11.43 percent per year. Tax revenues have been rising steadily over the past several years in Ukiah, reflecting the relative health of the city’s economy. The City's annual budget projects revenue from taxes to reach $21,231,843 in FY 2021-22. Revenue from taxes makes up between 25 and 30 percent of the total revenue received over time by the City of Ukiah. TABLE 3-4: REVENUES, 2017 Revenue Source Revenues Percent of Total Charges for Service 35,349,078 57 .0% Taxes $17,036,826 27 .5% Grants and Subventions $3,722,619 6 .0% Licenses/Permits/Franchises $2,399,555 3 .9% Other Revenues $1,805,149 2 .9% Use of Money and Property $918,529 1 .5% Assessments $587,827 0 .9% Fines, Forfeitures, and Penalties $245,308 0 .4% 213. ECONOMICS & ECONOMY // Page 238 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK22 Page 239 of 585 4. LAND USE Land use policies, plans, and ordinances guide development and shape the urban fabric of the Ukiah Planning Area. This section provides a snapshot of local land use patterns in Ukiah and examines existing and planned land uses in Ukiah. The section also summarizes regional plans and discusses how these plans influence land use within the city of Ukiah. 234. LAND USE // Page 240 of 585 Notable Boundaries The existing General Plan uses several terms to describe the city and associated planning boundaries (Figure 4-1): • City Limits: The political boundary that defines land that has been incorporated into a city. Ukiah has land use authority over all land within its city limits. • Sphere of Influence (SOI): The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) establishes the Sphere of Influence (SOI), which defines the probable physical boundary and service area of a local agency. An SOI typically includes both incorporated and unincorporated areas within which the City will have primary responsibility for the provision of public facilities and services. The mapped SOI for Ukiah does not reflect the amended SOI that was adopted by the City Council in Spring 2020, as this boundary is under consideration for adoption by LAFCO. Adoption of a new SOI is anticipated by Fall 2020. • Planning Area: A general plan, pursuant to State law, must address all areas within the jurisdiction’s Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses all incorporated and unincorporated territory that bears a physical relationship to the long-term planning of the city. For Ukiah, the Planning Area is defined as the area within both the city limits and SOI. 3,071 acres 40,913 acres 40,913 acres WHY ARE THE PLANNING AREA AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE SO LARGE? The 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan, although serving as the City's municipal general plan, was designed as an early area plan for the Ukiah Valley. This effort established a large Planning Area/Sphere of Influence, as well as goals, policies and programs that reflected an areawide approach. In 2011, however, Mendocino County adopted the Ukiah Valley Area Plan (UVAP), a comprehensive and long range inter-jurisdictional planning document that defines how the Ukiah Valley will develop in the future. Although the regional approach of the 1995 General Plan was a worthwhile planning effort ultimately leading to development of the UVAP, the General Plan should be updated to serve as the City's municipal general plan focused on the incorporated areas of Ukiah and areas likely to develop by 2040. Although not required by State law, the General Plan Update will seek to achieve consistency with the UVAP. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK24 Page 241 of 585 No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Spring s R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t East S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e N o r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stree t Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Street Oak Knoll Road Walnut Avenue West Mill Str e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d Ai r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t Hi g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson S t r e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. 0 1 20.5 Miles ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs City Limits Planning Area/ Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream UkiahUkiah 222 253 FIGURE 4-1: BOUNDARIES 254. LAND USE // Page 242 of 585 FIGURE 4-2: EXISTING LAND USE BREAKDOWN, CITY OF UKIAH Existing Land Use Critical to the preparation of the updated 2040 Land Use Diagram, is an understanding of the type and distribution of existing land uses and development in the city. Existing land use data is provided by the County Assessors Office and based on the taxed use for each parcel. The existing land use of a property does not carry any regulatory significance and may or may not be consistent with the current General Plan land use designation or zoning for the property. However, this information can assist in evaluating if past General Plan policies were effective in directing new growth and if development is consistent with the General Plan. Ukiah city limits consist of 3,071 acres. Figures 4-2 and 4-3 show that over 33.1 percent of this area is comprised of residential development (i.e., single-family, multifamily, mobile home parks). Public and Quasi- Public uses, which include care facilities, churches, schools, shelters, and government-owned property, make up nearly 18.7 percent of the city. Commercial areas comprise 12.2 percent of the city and are concentrated along Main and State Streets and near Highway 101. Parks and open space areas make up 9.74 percent of Ukiah, which include parks, the Ukiah Valley Golf Course, and trails. Figure 4-2 shows a breakdown of existing land uses. Land Use Acres Percent Agriculture 72 .4 2 .4 Commercial 376 .3 12 .3 Industrial 43 .4 1 .4 Parks and Open Space 299 .2 9 .7 Public/Quasi-Public 574 .9 18 .7 Residential 1015 .2 33 .1 Vacant 239 .4 7 .8 Undefined 16 .3 0 .5 Roadways 433 .9 14 .1 Total 3,071 100.0 Commercial: 12.3% Industrial: 1.4% Parks & Open Space: 9.7% Vacant: 7.8% Residential: 33.1% Agriculture: 2.4% Undefined: 0.5% Public/ Quasi-Public: 18.7% Roadways: 14.1% // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK26 Page 243 of 585 Source: Mendocino County Assessor’s Office, 2019. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ Residential Public/Quasi-Public Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space Agricutlure Undefined Vacant S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k 222 FIGURE 4-3: EXISTING LAND USE 274. LAND USE // Page 244 of 585 Existing (1995) General Plan Land Uses Since 1995, the existing General Plan has served as a guide for how land in the city may be developed. The General Plan, and associated Land Use Diagram, assign each parcel a particular use and establish broad development policies that shape distinct neighborhoods, districts, and corridors, while preserving open space, parks, and public use areas. Land use designations identify the types of development (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial), the density for residential uses (how many units are permitted per acre), and the intensity for commercial and industrial designations (the maximum allowed building bulk and lot coverage) that is permitted on each parcel. Figure 4-4 diagrams existing general plan land uses. The current General Plan, adopted in 1995 and amended in 2004, includes nine land use designations: • Rural Residential: Permits residential uses up to one dwelling unit per acre. • Low Density Residential: Permits residential uses up to six dwelling units per acre. • Medium Density Residential: Permits residential uses up to 14 dwelling units per acre. • High Density Residential: Permits residential uses up to 28 dwelling units per acre. • Commercial: Permits retail and service businesses, as well as residential uses up to 28 dwelling units per acre. • Industrial: Permits manufacturing and major employment uses. • Recreational: Permits parks and other recreational uses in the city. • Public: Permits public uses, including all land owned by public agencies, such as schools, public utility facilities, and civic centers. • Master Planned Area: The Master Plan Area land use classification is to be applied to the parcels contained within a Master Plan or a Specific Plan at the time of adoption by the City or County. The master plan area depicted on the map represents the Airport Industrial Park. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK28 Page 245 of 585 FIGURE 4-4: EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USES 294. LAND USE // Page 246 of 585 Existing Zoning While the General Plan provides general guidance on the location, type, and density/ intensity of new growth and development projects over the long term, the City's Zoning Ordinance provides detailed development regulations and use standards for each parcel of land. The Zoning Ordinance includes a set of zoning districts that specify uses that are permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited within each district. Figure 4-5 depicts existing zoning in the city. Table 4-1, found on page 32, shows a breakdown of existing zones. Ukiah has 14 Zoning Districts, organized as follows: • R1, R1H, R2, and R3 are residential zones ranging from low density hillside single-family to higher density multifamily. Combined, these residential zones account for more than 49 percent of the area within city limits and the majority of the west side. Residential land uses range in density from 1 du/ac in R1H to 28 du/ac in R3. • Industrial and commercial zones are Manufacturing (M), Community Commercial (C1), Heavy Commercial (C2), and Neighborhood Commercial (CN). Commercial zones are generally situated immediately west of U.S. Route 101 and along North and South State Street, and account for approximately 15 percent of city. Height restrictions for commercial zones are 50 feet in Manufacturing zones, 50 feet in Community Commercial zones, 40 feet in Heavy Commercial zones, and 30 feet in Neighborhood Commercial zones. • The Public Facilities zone (PF) includes City facilities, parks, and public land. PF is the largest zone in the city, containing approximately 24 percent of the city, including the Ukiah Municipal Airport. Building heights in the Public Facilities zone are restricted to 30 feet for park, school, and fairground buildings, and 40 feet for utility facilities and safety structures. • Planned Development zones exist within the city, one for residential and one for commercial. Planned Development zones are intended to encourage development by providing more flexibility than is possible through the strict application of the Zoning Code requirements and allowing flexibility of design and the application of new techniques in land development. Large Residential Planned Development sites can be found at the intersection of Empire Drive and Despina Drive, along North Orchard Avenue just north of Clara Avenue, and along South Orchard Avenue just south of East Gobbi Street. Commercial Planned Development is comprised of a large area bounded by Airport Road to the west, U.S. Route 101 to the east, and Talmage Road to the North. See the Introduction section of this workbook for a discussion of the difference between a General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK30 Page 247 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k C1 - Community Commercial C2 - Heavy Commercial CN - Neighborhood Commercial DC - Downtown Core GU - General Urban M - Manufacturing PDC - Planned Development Commercial PDR - Planned Development Residential PF - Public Facility R1 - Single Family Residential R1H - Single Family Residential - Hillside R2 - Medium Density Residential R3 - High Density Residential UC - Urban Center Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 FIGURE 4-5: ZONING 314. LAND USE // Page 248 of 585 • In 2012 the City adopted the Downtown Zoning Code (DZC) to encourage the development of a healthy, safe, diverse, compact, and walkable urban community. The DZC created three downtown-specific zoning districts, shown on Figure 4-6: ◦General Urban (GU) zone allows for mixed-use and urban residential uses in a wide range of building types, from single use and single-family to a mix of uses and multifamily. GU zone allows for residential densities between 10 and 28 du/ac. ◦Urban Center (UC) zone allows for higher-density residential and mixed-use buildings that may accommodate retail, office, services, local and regional civic uses, and residential uses. This zone has a tight network of streets with wide sidewalks, regularly spaced street tree planting, and buildings set close to lot frontages. The UC zones allows for residential densities between 15 and 28 du/ac. ◦Downtown Core (DC) zone allows the highest density and intensity of development by allowing a wide variety of commercial and residential uses located in mixed-use buildings. This zone has small, walkable blocks with regularly spaced street trees and buildings set at the frontage line. The DC zone allows for residential densities between 15 and 28 du/ac. Table 4-1 shows the distribution of existing zones in the city of Ukiah. Zone Acres Percent Community Commercial - C1 203 .5 7 .7% Heavy Commercial - C2 138 .4 5 .2% Neighborhood Commercial - CN 49 .6 1 .9% Manufacturing - M 28 .5 1 .1% Planned Development, Commercial - PDC 128 .5 4 .9% Planned Development, Residential - PDR 91 .5 3 .5% Public Facilities - PF 638 .3 24 .2% Single-Family Residential - R1 626 .0 23 .7% Single Family Residential, Hillside - R1H 489 .4 18 .6% Medium-Density Residential - R2 75 .1 2 .8% High-Density Residential - R3 108 .4 4 .1% Downtown Core - DC 5 .2 0 .2% General Urban - GU 14 .7 0 .6% Urban Core - UC 37 .7 1 .4% Right-of-Way 2 .4 0 .1% Total 2637.2 100.0% TABLE 4-1: EXISTING ZONES // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK32 Page 249 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Redemeyer Road N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stre e t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t S o u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Redemeyer Road N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stre e t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t S o u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k UC - Urban Center DC - Downtown Core GU - General Urban Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. 00.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 FIGURE 4-6: DOWNTOWN-SPECIFIC ZONING DISTRICTS S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Redemeyer Road N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stre e t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Redemeyer Road N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k UC - Urban Center DC - Downtown Core GU - General Urban Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 334. LAND USE // Page 250 of 585 Land Available for Development The City of Ukiah 2019-2027 Housing Element identified vacant parcels and underutilized sites available for development within city limits. The vacant parcels inventoried in the process are summarized by the following: • Ukiah has nearly 120 acres of vacant land available for development within the city limits (Figure 4-7 and Table 4-2). • The majority of vacant land in Ukiah is designated for residential development (113.64 acres). • With 5.17 acres of vacant land, commercial zones comprise much of the remainder of vacant land in the city. • There is one vacant parcel in a Neighborhood Commercial zone (0.41 acres) and one vacant parcel in a General Urban zone (0.1 acres). Underutilized Sites In the Housing Element process (2019), the City used parcel improvement value data from the County Assessor to identify underutilized parcels. Underutilized sites were classified as parcels where the improvement value was less than $20,000, which suggested that the parcels were underutilized to a degree that would make them more likely to redevelop within the planning period. Figure 4-8 shows underutilized sites in Ukiah. Underutilized and vacant parcels are considered opportunity sites for future development or redevelopment. TABLE 4-2: VACANT LAND BY ZONE Zone Acres Percent Residential 113 .6 95 .2% Commercial 5 .2 4 .3% Neighborhood Commercial 0 .4 0 .4% General Urban 0 .1 0 .1% TOTAL*119.3 100.00% *Totals may not add due to rounding. Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK34 Page 251 of 585 R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 Zoning District R1H - Single Family Residential - HIllside R1 - Single Family Residential R2 - Medium Density Residential R3 - High Density Residential CN - Neighborhood Commercial C1 - Community Commercial C2 - Heavy Commercial GU - General Urban UC - Urban Center DC - Downtown Core M - Manufacturing PF - Public Facility PDR - Planned Development Residential PDC - Planned Development Commercial FIGURE 4-7: VACANT SITES 354. LAND USE // Page 252 of 585 R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 Zoning District R1H - Single Family Residential - HIllside R1 - Single Family Residential R2 - Medium Density Residential R3 - High Density Residential CN - Neighborhood Commercial C1 - Community Commercial C2 - Heavy Commercial GU - General Urban UC - Urban Center DC - Downtown Core M - Manufacturing PF - Public Facility PDR - Planned Development Residential PDC - Planned Development Commercial FIGURE 4-8: UNDERUTILIZED SITES // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK36 Page 253 of 585 Other Notable City of Ukiah Plans Design Guidelines Ukiah established design guidelines in two steps, starting in 1992, when the City adopted Design Guidelines for Commercial Structures within the Downtown District. This effort was followed by adoption of Design Guidelines for Commercial Structures Outside the Downtown District in 1996. These design guidelines provide recommendations on the form, rather than use, of structures in the city. The City does not have design guidelines for residential structures. Ukiah Municipal Airport Master Plan The Airport Master Plan, adopted by the City in 1996, serves as a framework within which individual airport projects can be implemented. The Master Plan summarizes airport inventory, role and activity, and financial plan, and establish standards for airfield design and building area development. Importantly, the Master Plan analyzes noise and safety compatibility issues and provides compatibility measures for impact mitigation. Regional Planning Efforts Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan Adopted in 1993, the Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (ACLUP) established the criteria and policies which the Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission use in assessing the compatibility between the public-use airports in Mendocino County and proposed land use development in the areas surrounding them. The ACLUP established airport compatibility zones, later adopted by the City of Ukiah Municipal Airport Master Plan, that cover the southern area of the city and unincorporated parks of Mendocino County. The compatibility zones do not change the underlying zoning, but place additional development standards to ensure that uses in those zones are compatible with both the needs and impacts of the airport. Table 4-3 describes the airport compatibility zones, which are shown on Figure 4-9. Currently (2019), Mendocino County and the City of Ukiah are in the process of updating the ACLUP with an updated land use plan for Ukiah Municipal Airport. The new ACLUP is expected to be completed in July 2020. 374. LAND USE // Page 254 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 Source: Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, 19966, Figure 3F. Source: Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, 19966, Figure 3F. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ Airport Compatibility Zone 222 FIGURE 4-9: AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONES A High Risk B1 Substantial Risk B2 Moderate Risk C Limited Risk D Negligible Risk S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stree t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 D C B2 A B2 C B1 B1 C B2 B1 A A B1 Source: Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, 19966, Figure 3F. Source: Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, 19966, Figure 3F. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ Airport Compatibility Zone 222 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK38 Page 255 of 585 TABLE 4-3: AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ZONES Zone Location/ Compatibility Factors Impact Elements Density Restrictions Residential (du/ac) Other Uses (people/ac) A Runway protection Zone or within Building Restriction Line • High Risk • High noise levels 0 du/ac maximum 10 people/ac B1 Approach/Departure Zone and Adjacent to Runway • Substantial risk - aircraft commonly below 400 ft . AGL or within 1,000 ft . of runway • Substantial noise Parcels should be a minimum of 10 acres 60 people/ac B2 Extended Approach Departure Zone • Moderate risk - aircraft commonly below 800 ft . AGL • Significant noise Parcels should be a minimum of two acres 60 people/ac C Common Traffic Pattern • Limited risk - aircraft at or below 1,000 AGL • Frequent noise intrusion 15 du/ac 150 people/ac D Other Airport Environs • Negligible risk • Potential for annoyance from overflights No limit No limit Source: California Department of Transportation, California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, October 2011. Ukiah Valley Area Plan The Ukiah Valley Area Plan (UVAP), adopted by Mendocino County in 2011, governs land use and planning of the unincorporated areas of the Ukiah Valley. Although the document does not cover the city of Ukiah, it does establish land use designations and development standards within the City of Ukiah Planning Area/Sphere of Influence. The UVAP planning area is depicted on Figure 4-10. 394. LAND USE // Page 256 of 585 No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Springs R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e No r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Street Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Oak Knoll Roa d Walnut Avenue West Mill Str e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e So u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson St r e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k 0 1 20.5 Miles ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Ukiah City Limits Ukiah Valley Area Plan Planning Area/ Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream UkiahUkiah 222 253 FIGURE 4-10: PLANNING AREA, UKIAH VALLEY AREA PLAN // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK40 Page 257 of 585 414. LAND USE // Page 258 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK42 Attachment 4 Page 259 of 585 5. HOUSING Housing is a critical component of health and well-being in a community. Individuals and families require safe, adequate, secure, and affordable housing. The City of Ukiah strives to achieve a balanced housing stock that meets the needs of all economic segments of the community. This section provides an analysis of housing trends in Ukiah today. Section 65302(c) of the California Government Code requires that the City of Ukiah adopt a Housing Element as part of the General Plan to analyze issues of housing availability, affordability, and needs within the community. In addition, the Housing Element seeks to set goals, policies, programs and implementation strategies to address those issues. Unlike the other elements of a General Plan, Housing Elements are required to be updated on a State-mandated review cycle. City Staff prepared a draft 2019-2027 Housing Element Update for public review in summer 2019. Following the public review period, Staff prepared a new draft, which was adopted by the City Council on October 23, 2019 and certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development on December 5, 2019. The data presented in this section was extracted from this updated Housing Element. 435. HOUSING // Page 260 of 585 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Above Moderate Moderate Low Very Low 20182017201620152014 Ne w H o u s i n g C o n s t r u c t i o n S t a r t s Housing Units State law requires each city and county to plan for its “fair share” of the statewide housing need. This fair share is calculated through a process called the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). For the sixth cycle RHNA projection period from December 31, 2018, to August 15, 2027, the City of Ukiah was assigned a RHNA of 239 units. Even after accounting for the difference in the number of years in this cycle compared to the 2014-2019 cycle, the 2018-2027 RHNA is significantly higher (more than 200 percent) than the 2014-2019 RHNA at 45 units. Based on the amount of housing production expected by the California Department of Housing and Community Development from 2018 to 2027, the city will need to create the conditions for sufficient housing production to meet its regional need (RHNA). The City of Ukiah has implemented a variety of incentive-based programs over the preceding five years in an attempt to increase housing production for all economic segments of the community. These include creation of a housing trust fund known as the Ukiah Housing Trust Fund, creation of a new Housing Division within the Department of Community Development, development and implementation of a new (2017) Housing Strategy designed to increase production of affordable and middle- income market-rate housing, as well as other programmatic strategies. The result has been a significant increase in new housing construction starts, all of which are infill, as depicted below on Figure 5-1. Due to these efforts, the City was one of 12 cities and counties out of 538 jurisdictions in full compliance with housing production goals. FIGURE 5-1: NEW HOUSING CONSTRUCTION STARTS Income Level RHNA (2014- 2019) 2014 Units 2015 Units 2016 Units 2017 Units 2018 Units Total Units (2014- 2018) Total Remaining RHNA (2014-2019) Very Low (0-50%)11 0 31 0 0 37 68 0 Low (51-80%)7 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 Moderate (81-120%)7 0 0 0 0 35 35 0 Above Moderate (120% +)20 0 5 7 4 16 32 0 Total Units 45 145 0 Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK44 Page 261 of 585 Vacancy Rate Vacancy rates are an important indicator of housing availability. High vacancy rates usually indicate low demand, and low vacancy rates can indicate high demand and/ or an inadequate supply. Generally, a “healthy” vacancy rate for single-family homes is 2 to 3 percent, and 7 to 8 percent for multifamily, to allow for normal housing turnover. According to the 2010 Census, the overall vacancy rate in Ukiah was 5.3 percent, including units vacant for seasonal or occasional use, rented and sold units that were vacant, and other unclassified vacant units. The data shows that vacancy rates in nearly doubled between 2000 and 2010, likely due to the slumping economy at that time. As the economy has recovered, the vacancy rates have declined from 2000 levels, as shown in Figure 5-2. In 2017, the overall vacancy rate was 3.0 percent. While the rental vacancy rate fell slightly from 3.7 to 2.8 percent between 2010 and 2017, the owner vacancy rate dropped steeply to just 0.2 percent. Understanding that Ukiah has low rental and owner vacancy rates seems to be a sentiment shared by the community. In 2018, the City conducted a community housing survey and found that over 70 percent of respondents listed the number one issue or barrier to obtaining suitable housing was “home/rent prices” (55 percent) or “lack of available housing inventory” (17 percent). The City received similar comments at housing workshops that the City hosted in March and April of 2019. Source: 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census, 2013-2017 American Community Survey. FIGURE 5-2: VACANCY RATE 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%Overall vacancy rate Owner vacancy rate Rental vacancy rate 201720102000 Va c a n c y R a t e Year 455. HOUSING // Page 262 of 585 Housing Mix The California Department of Finance estimates that in January 2018, the majority (55 percent) of the city’s housing stock was single-family detached homes. The second most common type of housing was multifamily (19 percent), which includes apartments and condominiums. In 2018, there were significantly less 2- to 4-unit complexes or mobile homes (Figure 5-3). Source: 2018 California Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates. FIGURE 5-3: HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE 55% Sing l e -f ami l y d e t ach e d 6 % Sin gle -f ami l y a t t ach e d 13% 2 to 4 a t t ach e d 19% M u l t i f ami l y (i n clude s c ondo s ) 7 % M obile H o m e s Single-family detached home in Ukiah Single-family attached homes in Ukiah Multi-family homes in Ukiah // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK46 Page 263 of 585 1939 or earlier (10.3%) 1940 to 1949 (11.0%) 1950 to 1959 (17.1%) 1960 to 1969 (10.7%) 1970 to 1979 (20.8%) 1980 to 1989 (21.2%) 1990 to 1999 (5.6%) 2000 to 2009 (3.0%) 2010 and later (0.3%) Age of Housing Stock If not properly and regularly maintained, housing can deteriorate neighborhood housing conditions, decreasing property values and impacting neighborhood pride and quality of life. Typically, housing over 30 years of age is more likely to have needs for rehabilitation. Over 90 percent of all housing stock in the city of Ukiah was built in 1989 or earlier and is over 30 years of age. Only 10 percent of housing stock is newer, and until quite recently very few new housing units were constructed. Homeownership Home equity is the largest single source of household wealth for most Americans. According to a 2013 survey conducted by the Federal Reserve, the net worth of the typical homeowner was 36 times that of the typical renter. The national homeownership rate has risen from around 40 percent before World War II to 69 percent in 2005, before dropping to 64 percent in 2017. In comparison, in 2017 just 42 percent of Ukiah residents owned their homes (Figure 5-5). This contrasts with Mendocino County, where 59 percent of residents owned their homes, and with the nation as a whole, where 64 percent of residents owned their homes. Please note: housing units were produced in 2010 and later that are not recorded on the above Figure. This analysis included data only from ACS for consistency purposes. Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates. FIGURE 5-4: YEAR HOUSING STRUCTURES BUILT Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey. 42%58% FIGURE 5-5: HOME OWNERSHIP 1939 or earlier (10.3%) 1940 to 1949 (11.0%) 1950 to 1959 (17.1%) 1960 to 1969 (10.7%) 1970 to 1979 (20.8%) 1980 to 1989 (21.2%) 1990 to 1999 (5.6%) 2000 to 2009 (3.0%) 2010 and later (0.3%) 1939 or earlier (10.3%) 1940 to 1949 (11.0%) 1950 to 1959 (17.1%) 1960 to 1969 (10.7%) 1970 to 1979 (20.8%) 1980 to 1989 (21.2%) 1990 to 1999 (5.6%) 2000 to 2009 (3.0%) 2010 and later (0.3%) Homeowner Renter 59%41% Ukiah Mendocino County 64%36%United States 475. HOUSING // Page 264 of 585 Housing Prices Median home prices in Ukiah and Mendocino County have been steadily increasing since 2012. The median home sale price in Ukiah in 2018 was $350,350, which was slightly less than the countywide average at $358,800. According to Zillow.com, the 2012 median home price was $211, 000 in Ukiah and $217,000 in Mendocino County. Housing Affordability Many households throughout the country struggle to afford decent housing. While higher-income households have more discretionary income to spend on housing, moderate- and lower-income households are limited in the range of housing that they can afford. A “cost- burdened” household pays more than 30 percent of gross household income for housing and utilities, while a “severely cost-burdened” household is paying more than 50 percent. For renters, housing-related costs may be the gross rent (contract rent plus utilities), whereas for a homeowner, housing-related costs may include mortgage payment, utilities, insurance, and real estate taxes. Table 5-1 represents overpayment data by income group for Ukiah, which is based on data from the 2011-2015 HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). Approximately 53 percent of renters paid more than 30 percent of their income on housing compared to 36 percent of owners. The households with the highest incidence of cost burden were very low-income renters, of which 79 percent overpaid for housing. Other high incidences of cost burden were found with low-income renters and owners, of which 70 percent and 69 percent respectively, paid more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Extremely low-income households, both renters and owners, experienced the highest cumulative overall incidence of cost burden (69 percent and 73 percent, respectively) for all income groups. $ The California Department of Housing and Community Development defines income limits for a family of four in Mendocino County (2019) as the following: EXTREMELY LOW-INCOME (30% of Median Family Income) $25,750 VERY LOW-INCOME (30% to 50%) $32,400 LOW-INCOME (50% to 80%) $51,850 MODERATE-INCOME (80% to 120%) $77,750 FAMILY INCOME Household Income Group Renters Owners Total Extremely Low (0-30% AMI)785 55 840 Cost Burden >30%540 40 580 %Cost Burden >30%68 .8%72 .7%69 .0% Very Low (31-50% AMI)980 125 1,105 Cost Burden >30%775 35 810 %Cost Burden >30%79 .1%28%73 .3% Low (51-80% AMI)625 325 950 Cost Burden >30%435 225 660 %Cost Burden >30%69 .6%69 .2%69 .5% Moderate or Above (>80% AMI)1,175 1,990 3,165 Cost Burden >30%150 605 755 %Cost Burden >30%12 .8%30 .4%23 .9% Total 3,565 2,495 6,066 Cost Burden >30%1,900 905 2,805 %Cost Burden >30%53 .3%36 .3%46 .2% TABLE 5-1: OVERPAYING HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK48 Page 265 of 585 Household Income GroupRentersOwnersTotal Extremely Low (0-30% AMI)78555840 Cost Burden >30%54040580 %Cost Burden >30%68 .8%72 .7%69 .0% Very Low (31-50% AMI)9801251,105 Cost Burden >30%77535810 %Cost Burden >30%79 .1%28%73 .3% Low (51-80% AMI)625325950 Cost Burden >30%435225660 %Cost Burden >30%69 .6%69 .2%69 .5% Moderate or Above (>80% AMI)1,1751,9903,165 Cost Burden >30%150605755 %Cost Burden >30%12 .8%30 .4%23 .9% Total3,5652,4956,066 Cost Burden >30%1,9009052,805 %Cost Burden >30%53 .3%36 .3%46 .2% Overcrowding The Census defines an overcrowded household as having more than one person per room, not including hallways, kitchens, or bathrooms. Severe overcrowding is defined as households with more than 1.5 persons per room. A high prevalence of overcrowding can indicate a community does not have adequate supply of affordable housing, especially for large families. Overcrowding also tends to deteriorate existing housing stock more rapidly. Therefore, maintaining a reasonable supply of housing and alleviating overcrowding is important for enhancing the quality of life in Ukiah. From 2013-2017, Ukiah had a higher rate of overcrowding in owner-occupied households at 6.3 percent compared to statewide rate of 4.0 percent (Table 5-2). However, statewide, there was significantly more overcrowding in renter-occupied housing at 13.3 percent compared to 2.9 percent in Ukiah. Homeless Population In 2018, Mendocino County contracted with Robert Marbut, Ph.D. to produce a report on homelessness in the county. The report, titled “Homelessness Needs Assessment and Action Steps for Mendocino County,” presented observations and findings, and recommended a series of actions for addressing homeless issues countywide. This report counted between 172 and 188 individuals experiencing homelessness in Ukiah. Both the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors and Ukiah City Council adopted the report, but most of the recommendations were primarily applicable to Mendocino County because the County facilitates and oversees the existing services to address homelessness. Previously, the 2017 Mendocino County Point-in-Time (PIT) Count reported a total of 1,238 homeless individuals in Mendocino County. This included 113 individuals in an emergency shelter, 47 in transitional housing, and 1,078 who were unsheltered. Of the total count, there were 824 males, or 67 percent, and 1,026 white persons, or 83 percent. The PIT count did not identify the geographic location of the persons counted. Ukiah California Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Total Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Total Overcrowded (More than 1 .0 persons/room)6 .3%2 .9%4 .4%4 .0%13 .3%8 .2% Severely overcrowded (More than 1 .5 persons/room)1 .7%1 .4%1 .5%1 .0%5 .0%2 .8% TABLE 5-2: OVERCROWDED HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey. 495. HOUSING // Page 266 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK50 Page 267 of 585 6. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION Ukiah’s transportation network and services provide mobility for residents, employees and visitors, and serve goods movement throughout the Planning Area. It’s easy to think of transportation as primarily the roadway network, serving vehicles; but this network also serves bicyclists, pedestrians, and buses. 516. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION // Page 268 of 585 Roadway Classifications Freeways. Freeways are Federally-designated highways that include multi-lane, bi-directional traffic separated by a barrier or median, with at least two lanes of traffic per direction. Access points are restricted to sanctioned interchanges, and on-and off-ramp locations. These roadways are under Caltrans jurisdiction. State Highways. State highways refer to roadways with no control of access, which may be divided or have grade-separated intersections. The State highways in Ukiah consist of U.S. 101 and State Route (SR) 222. U.S. 101 is an integral north-south arterial, connecting Ukiah to unincorporated areas and the greater Ukiah Valley, and spanning from Olympia, Washington to the north and Los Angeles, California to the south. SR 222, named Talmage Road along its entire length, is a small east-west spur route off of U.S. 101 in Ukiah that ends east outside of the city of Ten Thousand Buddhas. SR 20, at the northern end of the Planning Area, is an east-west route that connects U.S. 101 with the city of Clear Lake and Interstate 5 to the east. Arterials. Arterials serve major activity centers, as well as neighboring areas, and the highest traffic volume corridors to provide a network of continuous routes that facilitate local and interregional travel. Arterials in the city of Ukiah include East Perkins Street, East Gobbi Street, and Talmage Road (east-west), and North State Street and South Dora Street (north-south). Collectors. Collectors provide local access to the overall roadway network, channeling traffic from local roadways into the arterial network. Important collectors in the City of Ukiah include Low Gap Road, North Bush Street, North and South Main Streets, State Street south of East Gobbi Street. Local. Local roads provide direct access to neighboring areas and primarily facilitate local travel. In addition to roads within city limits, which are City maintained, and County-maintained roads in the Planning Area, some local roads in the unincorporated areas of the Ukiah Valley are maintained by private property owners. Roadways Roadways within the Ukiah Valley consist of a network of State and Federal highways, as well as City and County-maintained local roadways. The connections between these roadway systems play an integral role in connecting the city of Ukiah and Planning Area to Mendocino County. Figure 6-1 provides a map of roadway classifications in the Ukiah Planning Area. Figure 6-2 shows roadway classifications within the city of Ukiah. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK52 Page 269 of 585 No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Springs R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e No r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Street Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Oak Knoll Roa d Walnut Avenue West Mill Str e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e So u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson St r e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. 0 1 20.5 Miles ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs City Limits Planning Area/ Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream Highway/Arterial Minor Arterial Collector UkiahUkiah 222 253 20 FIGURE 6-1: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS, PLANNING AREA 536. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION // Page 270 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t S o u t h D o r a S t r r e t S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t S o u t h D o r a S t r r e t S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway/Arterial 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ Minor Arterial Collector 222 FIGURE 6-2: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS, CITY OF UKIAH // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK54 Page 271 of 585 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Figure 6-3 displays total VMT occurring on local roadways and State highways between 2001 and 2017 in the city of Ukiah. As shown, the total VMT has fluctuated slightly over time, with a decrease in 2015 followed by an increase in 2016 and 2017. Total VMT was at its highest point of 289,216 miles in 2017.Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is a measure used in transportation planning for a variety of purposes. It measures the amount of travel for all vehicles in a geographic region over a given period of time, typically a one-year period. VMT is calculated by adding up all the miles driven by all the cars and trucks on all the roadways in a region. This metric plays an integral role in transportation planning, policy-making, and revenue estimation processes due to its ability to indicate travel demand and behavior. SB 743. In 2013, the State of California passed Senate Bill (SB) 743, which mandates that jurisdictions can no longer use automobile delay – commonly measured by Level of Service (LOS) – in transportation analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Beginning July 1, 2020, jurisdictions must use VMT to analyze the transportation impacts of a proposed plan or project under CEQA. WHAT IS VMT? FIGURE 6-3: STATE HIGHWAY AND LOCAL ROAD VMT, 2001-2017 Figure 6-4 displays the combined local road and State highway VMT within the city of Ukiah on a per capita basis using Department of Finance population statistics. Between 2001 and 2014, Ukiah VMT fluctuated slightly between roughly 16 and 17 daily VMT per capita. In recent years, VMT per capita saw a notable decline in 2015, followed by an increase in 2016 and high point of 18 miles per capita in 2017. 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 Highway VMTLocal Road VMT 20 1 7 20 1 6 20 1 5 20 1 4 20 1 3 20 1 2 20 1 1 20 1 0 20 0 9 20 0 8 20 0 7 20 0 6 200 5 200 4 200 3 200 2 200 1 VM T Year Source: HPMS DVMT and Caltrans Traffic Census Program AADT 2001-2017. Source: HPMS DVMT and Caltrans Traffic Census Program AADT 2001-2017. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 7 20 1 6 20 1 5 20 1 4 20 1 3 20 1 2 20 1 1 20 1 0 20 0 9 20 0 8 20 0 7 20 0 6 20 0 5 20 0 4 20 0 3 20 0 2 20 0 1 VM T p e r C a p i t a ( D a i l y ) Year FIGURE 6-4: STATE HIGHWAY AND LOCAL ROAD VMT PER CAPITA, UKIAH, 2001-2017 556. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION // Page 272 of 585 Travel Characteristics How Do Ukiah Residents Get to Work? Ukiah residents overwhelmingly commute alone by car, with a notable minority carpooling (Figure 6-5). Additionally, four percent of residents work from home. Figure 6-6 displays the distribution of commute type, including single- occupancy vehicles (SOV), carpooling, public transportation, and working from home, from 1980 to 2017. As shown, SOVs have remained the most common commute modes in Ukiah over the past few decades. 86% 1% 9% 4% CARPOOL WORK FROM HOMEPUBLIC TRANSIT SINGLE-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE FIGURE 6-6: COMMUTE MODE SHARE, 1980-2017 Source: IPUMS NHGIS. FIGURE 6-5: COMMUTE METHODS 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 WORK FROM HOMEPUBLIC TRANSPORTATIONCARPOOLSOV 20172016201520142013201220112010200019901980 4,933 4,8794,6214,5634,7564,7514,6904,5134,3883,599 5,194 176 195 255248 506460531228 191 92 238 516 634 5045785976306141,032693 463 5474666 13208211739 36 32 45 Uk i a h W o r k f o r c e Source: IPUMS NHGIS. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK56 Page 273 of 585 FIGURE 6-6: COMMUTE MODE SHARE, 1980-2017 How Long are their Commutes? Figure 6-8 displays the commute patterns by direction of home census block to work census block. Though the majority of Ukiah residents commute less than 25 miles to work, nearly a quarter must travel more than 50 miles for work each day (Table 6-1). Those traveling 50 miles or more typically commute to areas southeast of the city, such as Santa Rosa, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Petaluma. All Jobs for All Workers in 2017 Distance and Direction from Home Census Block to Work Census Block, Living in Selection Area Less than 10 miles10 to 24 miles 25 to 50 miles Greater than 50 miles All Jobs for All Workers in 2017 Distance from Home Census Block to Work Census Block, Living in Selection Area 2017DistanceCount Share Total All Jobs 6,691 100.0 Less than 10 miles 3,913 58.5 10 to 24 miles 653 9.8 25 to 50 miles 398 5.9Greater than 50 miles 1,727 25.8 Page2of3 Travel Number Percent Less than 10 miles 3,913 58 .5% 10 to 24 miles 653 9 .8% 25 to 50 miles 398 5 .9% Greater than 50 miles 1,727 25 .8% TOTAL 6,691 100.00% FIGURE 6-8: JOBS BY DISTANCE AND DIRECTION, 2017. TABLE 6-1: JOBS BY DISTANCE, 2017. Where do they Work? Figure 6-7 shows commuting patterns in and out of Ukiah. Of the 9,499 people employed in the city of Ukiah, 2,669 live in the city and 6,830 commute in from other areas. More than 4,000 Ukiah residents commute out of the city for work. LIVE AND WORK IN UKIAH 2,669 WORK IN UKIAH BUT LIVE OUTSIDE 6,830 LIVE IN UKIAH BUT WORK OUTSIDE 4,022 FIGURE 6-7: COMMUTING All Jobs for All Workers in 2017 Distance and Direction from Work Census Block to Home Census Block, Employed in Selection Area Less than 10 miles 10 to 24 miles 25 to 50 miles Greater than 50 miles All Jobs for All Workers in 2017 Distance from Work Census Block to Home Census Block, Employed in Selection Area 2017 Distance Count Share Total All Jobs 9,499 100.0 Less than 10 miles 5,423 57.1 10 to 24 miles 1,358 14.3 25 to 50 miles 562 5.9 Greater than 50 miles 2,156 22.7 Page2of3 All Jobs for All Workers in 2017 Distance and Direction from Work Census Block to Home Census Block, Employed in Selection Area Less than 10 miles 10 to 24 miles 25 to 50 miles Greater than 50 miles All Jobs for All Workers in 2017 Distance from Work Census Block to Home Census Block, Employed in Selection Area 2017 Distance Count Share Total All Jobs 9,499 100.0 Less than 10 miles 5,423 57.1 10 to 24 miles 1,358 14.3 25 to 50 miles 562 5.9 Greater than 50 miles 2,156 22.7 Page2of3 Source: US Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies, LEHD on the Map. Source: US Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies, LEHD on the Map. UKIAH JOBS: 9,499 JOBS HELD BY UKIAH RESIDENTS: 6,691 576. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION // Page 274 of 585 Active Transportation Active transportation in Ukiah takes place on 9.1 miles of bike lanes and an extensive sidewalk network, which is particularly robust through downtown and surrounding areas. However, there are several areas in the city that have gaps in the sidewalk network that prove as potential barriers for walking trips. Historically, walking and biking has fluctuated over time as shown in Figure 6-9, which displays walking and biking as a percentage of total transportation between 2009 and 2017. Walking, as a means of transportation, was highest in 2009, preceding a fluctuation, then an upward trend from 2014 to 2017. Similarly, biking as a means of transportation has also fluctuated, but has been decreasing following a peak in 2014. 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%Biking Walking 201720162015201420132012201120102009 FIGURE 6-9: WALKING AND BIKING AS A MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION WHAT IS ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION? Source: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 2009- 2017 Active transportation refers to human-powered methods of travel, such as walking or bicycling to get from one place to another. Everyone uses active transportation at some point in a trip, whether walking to a rail station or bicycling to work. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK58 Page 275 of 585 UKIAH MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Runway: Asphalt Length: 4,423 feet Width: 150 feet 119 Aircraft Operations/day Typical Operations: freight, passenger travel, fire suppression, medevac Source: http://www.airnav.com/airport/KUKI Aviation Facilities The Ukiah Municipal Airport, located at the south end of Ukiah, serves the region as a public use, general aviation (GA) facility, and is expected to remain as such throughout the 20-year planning horizon. The City of Ukiah has owned and operated the Ukiah Municipal Airport since the 1930s. The airport has embarked on a program of improving the infrastructure of the airport, including improving pavement, repairing buildings, parking areas, and adding security fencing. These improvements are expected keep the airport viable for many years to come. 596. TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION // Page 276 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK60 Page 277 of 585 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, & INFRASTRUCTURE One of the core responsibilities of a City is to ensure provision of public facilities and services to its residents. Public facilities and services contribute to the quality of life for both individuals and groups in the community. A key consideration in the General Plan Update process is planning adequate public facilities, services, and infrastructure to accommodate future growth and changes. This section presents an overview of these facilities and community services within the city limits. 617. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, & INFRASTRUCTURE // Page 278 of 585 Overview of Public Services Ukiah is a full service City Power. Ukiah has its own Electric Utility Department that provides service to residents in the city and the surrounding environs. The municipally-owned utility operates the Lake Mendocino Hydroelectric Plant, one of the city’s major sources of electricity. The electric utility serves 6,100 residential and 2,100 commercial customers and has sufficient capacity to meet power needs for the foreseeable future. Wastewater. Ukiah’s Department of Public Works provides wastewater collection and treatment for about two-thirds of the city, and operates its own wastewater treatment plant. A separate agency, the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District (UVSD) serves the remaining portions of Ukiah, as well as communities in the SOI. Operated by the City, one wastewater treatment plant serves both the City and UVSD. The treatment plant has a current (2019) capacity to add nearly 1,603 equivalent sewer service units (ESSUs) before reaching capacity. One ESSU is equivalent to 210 gallons per day of typical domestic use. Solid Waste. Ukiah contracts its solid waste, recycling, and composting to a private company, Ukiah Waste Solutions, which serves residents within the city of Ukiah. The unincorporated areas of the Planning Area are served by Waste Management. Solid waste is transported to the Ukiah Valley Transfer Station, located at 3151 Taylor Drive in Ukiah. The transfer station is designed to receive 200 tons of waste per day, and currently receives an average of 120 to 130 tons per day. Water. Ukiah’s Department of Public Works provides water, primarily sourced from wells, to much of the city. Millview County Water District provides water to North Ukiah, and an unincorporated area bordering the city to the north. Willow County Water District provides water to South Ukiah and an unincorporated area bordering the city to the south. Finally, Calpella County Water District provides water to the community of Calpella. All four agencies are expected to adequately meet existing and future demands for water, including in the event of a dry year or multiple dry years. Storm Drainage. The Ukiah Department of Public Works manages the storm drainage system within the city. According to the 2012 Municipal Services Review, the capacity of the stormwater drainage system is unknown. Much of the city’s stormwater is conveyed by surface flow along the curb and gutter. There are intermittent storm drains throughout the city; however, there is no central trunk line for all of the storm drains to collect and convey stormwater to the Russian River. Communications. Broadband and cellular services are provided to residents and businesses from a variety of private companies, including national retailers Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint. Natural Gas. Natural gas service is provided by PG&E. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK62 Page 279 of 585 City Government Ukiah, incorporated in 1876, operates a full range of municipal functions including public safety, public works, community development, and community services. The City provides electric, water, and wastewater utilities for its residents and operates an airport, golf course, museum, and conference center. In financial year (FY) 2018-2019, the City had 220 full-time equivalent employees, nearly half of whom work in administrative and technical roles. Law Enforcement The City of Ukiah Police Department (UPD) provides law enforcement and dispatch services from a single station located at 300 Seminary Avenue. In 2020, UPD is authorized 34 sworn personnel. In 2018, UPD made 945 misdemeanor arrests, 427 felony arrests, 125 Driving Under the Influence arrests, and issued 875 traffic citations. In general UPD handled over 70 calls for service per day. Table 7-1 includes crime statistic for violent crimes and property crimes in 2016, 2017, and 2018. With the exception of vehicle theft and arson, crimes have been in decline over these years. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Response Fire protection and emergency medical response services are provided by the Ukiah Valley Fire Authority (UVFA), which provides service to approximately 90 square miles in and around Ukiah containing a resident population of approximately 30,000. Within its boundaries are historic downtown buildings, county governmental buildings, Mendocino Community College, Dharma Realm Buddhist University, a regional hospital, and all residential and commercial developments within the service area. UVFA is also responsible for the lower half of Lake Mendocino, including the Coyote Dam, expansive wildland urban interface areas, the Ukiah Municipal Airport, US 101, and State Route 253. UVFA is staffed by 19 full-time safety employees (Fire Chief, 3 Division Chiefs, 6 Captains, 6 Engineers and 3 Firefighters), one full-time administrative-clerical employee, and up to 25 dedicated volunteer firefighters, including a Volunteer Division Chief. UVFA maintains four fire stations (two staffed with career personnel) with the daily staffing consisting of a minimum of two/two person crews cross staffing Type I (Structural) and Type II/III (Wildland Interface) Engines and an on-call Duty Officer. CAL FIRE, the State fire agency, is responsible for the forested areas in the hills west of the city, including those within the Planning Area. CAL FIRE's Mendocino Unit is stationed in Ukiah at 2690 North State Street. Type 2016 2017 2018 Violent Crimes Homicide 0 0 1 Rape 15 14 15 Robbery 29 20 11 Assault 294 276 233 Property Crimes Burglary 107 59 77 Theft 284 234 148 Vehicle Theft 40 42 59 Arson 0 11 27 Source: Ukiah Police Department, Annual Report 2018. TABLE 7-1: CRIMES BY TYPE, 2016-2018 637. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, & INFRASTRUCTURE // Page 280 of 585 Healthcare Healthcare services are provided to the area by Adventist Health Ukiah Valley, a regional hospital located at 275 Hospital Drive in Ukiah. Specialized services include preventative care, emergency services, orthopedics, pediatrics, surgical services, opthalmology, hospice care, and virtual care. Hospital facilities also include a cancer treatment and infusion center, a family birth center, the Ukiah Valley Rural Health Center, and the Adventist Heart Institute. Education Both the City of Ukiah and Ukiah Planning Area are served by the Ukiah Unified School District (UUSD), which operates all public schools in the area, including the following: • Three preschools in the city and one in the Planning Area • Four elementary schools inside city limits, and two within the Planning Area • Two middle schools, one in the city and one in the Planning Area • Ukiah High School and South Valley High, both within city limits • Ukiah Adult School, located in city limits In addition to the Ukiah Unified School District schools, there are private preschools, four charter schools and a private religious school in the city. There are two higher education institutions in the Planning Area: • Mendocino College, a community college, is located to the north of the city. • Dharma Realm Buddhist University, which is part of the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas, is located in neighboring Talmage. Figure 7-1 shows the locations of schools within, and directly surrounding the city of Ukiah. Figure 7-2 shows additional Ukiah Unified schools in the Calpella and Redwood Valley areas. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK64 Page 281 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stree t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive S o u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k Ukiah High Pomolita Middle Grace Hudson Elementary Oak Manor Elementary Nokomis Elementary Yokayo Elementary Frank Zeek Elementary Head Start Child Development Program: Nokomis Accelerated Achievement Academy Small Wonders State Preschool Saint Mary of the Angels Catholic School Redwood Academy of Ukiah Tree of Life Charter School River Oak Charter Big Brothers Big Sisters Preschool NCO Preschool Village South Valley High New Life Preschool Ukiah School of Music Head Start Child Development Program Larue Preschool Space-Performing Arts School ValentinPreschool Barnes Preschool Discovery World Preschool New Morning Montessori Rural Communities Child Care Mendocino Ballet School Ukiah Co-Op Nursery School NCO Head Start Child Development Program Ukiah High Pomolita Middle Grace Hudson Elementary Oak Manor Elementary Nokomis Elementary Yokayo Elementary Frank Zeek Elementary Head Start Child Development Program: Nokomis Small Wonders State Preschool Accelerated Achievement Academy Saint Mary of the Angels Catholic School Redwood Academy of Ukiah Tree of Life Charter School River Oak Charter Big Brothers Big Sisters Preschool NCO Preschool Village South Valley High New Life Preschool Ukiah School of Music Head Start Child Development Program Larue Preschool Space-Performing Arts School ValentinPreschool Barnes Preschool Discovery World Preschool New Morning Montessori Rural Communities Child Care Mendocino Ballet School Ukiah Co-Op Nursery School NCO Head Start Child Development Program Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. City Limits Non-District School Ukiah Unified School District School River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 FIGURE 7-1: SCHOOLS 657. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, & INFRASTRUCTURE // Page 282 of 585 No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Springs R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t No r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e No r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stree t Moore Str e e t K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Street Oak Knoll Road Walnut Avenue West Mill Stre e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e So u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d Ai r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t Hi g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson S t r e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs UkiahUkiah Eagle Peak Middle School Calpella Preschool Eagle Peak Middle School Calpella Preschool 222 253 20 FIGURE 7-2: ADDITIONAL UKIAH UNIFIED SCHOOLS City Limits School Planning Area/ Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream E a s t R o a d School Way We s t R o a d Moore St r e e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Redwood Valley Calpella Redwood Valley Calpella Eagle Peak Middle School Calpella Preschool Eagle Peak Middle School Calpella Preschool 20 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK66 Page 283 of 585 Library Mendocino County operates one mobile library (Bookmobile) and five branch libraries: Ukiah, Fort Bragg, Willits, a Coast Community branch in Point Arena, and a Round Valley branch in Covelo. • Mendocino County libraries saw a total of 11,304 users in FY 2018- 2019. • The countywide library collection offers 525 programs across all library branches, with 260 children’s programs, 152 adult programs and 103 teen programs. The Ukiah library is the only branch of the Mendocino County Library within the Ukiah Planning Area. The Ukiah branch is located at 105 North Main Street and is open Tuesday through Sunday each week. Library events and collections are include the following: • Events for babies, toddlers, and children include story-time, crafts, and age-appropriate activities • Teen events and groups, such as the Craft Squad, Anime and Mange Club, and Bibliotherapy for Teens • Activities for adults include the Wines & Spines Book Club, MakerSpace events, the First Friday Art Walk Events and more • Special collections include a Local Author Collection, a Mendocino Grant Collection, a Grateful Dead Collection, and a Cannabis Book Collection The Ukiah Library 677. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, & INFRASTRUCTURE // Page 284 of 585 WHAT IS A DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITY? A disadvantaged unincorporated community is a fringe, island, or legacy community in which the median household income is 80 percent or less than the statewide median household income. WHAT IS A FRINGE COMMUNITY? A fringe community is an inhabited and unincorporated territory within the Planning Area. WHAT IS AN ISLAND COMMUNITY? An island community is any inhabited and unincorporated territory that is surrounded or substantially surrounded by one or more cities or by one or more cities and a county boundary or the Pacific Ocean. WHAT IS A LEGACY COMMUNITY? A legacy community is any geographically isolated unincorporated community that is inhabited and has existed for at least 50 years. Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities Pursuant to Senate Bill 244 Disadvantaged Communities (Government Code Section 65302.10), the City must identify each unincorporated island, fringe, or legacy community within the Planning Area. Once identified, the general plan must provide a description of each community; a map designating its location; an analysis of water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, and structural fire protection needs or deficiencies; and an analysis of benefit assessment districts or other financing alternatives that could make the extension of City services financially feasible. To be considered a disadvantaged unincorporated community (DUC), a community must meet two criteria: • The community must be comprised of no less than 10 dwellings adjacent or in close proximity to one another. • The median household income in the community must be 80 percent or less than the statewide median household income of $67,169. Eighty percent of the statewide median household income is approximately $53,735. In order to identify DUCs, the City first identified unincorporated areas within the Planning Area that had a median income that was 80 percent less than the State median (Figure 7-3). Next, within the areas identified, the City identified groupings of ten or more dwelling units that were in close proximity to each other and that were also similar in form to the density of residential areas typically located in suburban and urban communities. After identifying these potential DUCs, the City reviewed each to confirm they matched the intent of the SB 244 analysis and that the digital data sources used match current realities. Through this identification process, the City identified 11 DUCs within the Planning Area. These communities are depicted on Figures 7-4 and 7-5, and in Table 7-2. DUC Identifier DUC Size (acres) Dwelling Units (approximate) # of Parcels South of the City of Ukiah City Limits DUC #1 8 .4 15 4 DUC #2 8 .8 30 32 DUC #3 29 .0 15 16 DUC #4 255 .0 680 578 DUC #5 8 .5 25 26 North of the City of Ukiah City Limits DUC #6 66 .1 330 295 DUC #7 16 .7 25 17 DUC #8 59 .7 270 213 DUC #9 22 .9 150 2 DUC #10 72 .0 200 108 DUC #11 32 .7 35 61 TOTAL 579 .8 1,775 1,352 TABLE 7-2: IDENTIFIED DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK68 Page 285 of 585 LAK E M E N D O C I N O Sh 20 North State Str e e t S h 2 5 3 L o w G a p Road Orr Springs Road Old River Road Sh 222 Mill Creek Road S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t E a s t R o a d Russ i a n R i v e r Source: City of Ukiah, 2019.0 1 2 3 40.5 Miles ¯ Highway Rail Line River/Stream City Limits Parcels Low-Income Census Designated Place Low-Income Census Block Group FIGURE 7-3: LOW INCOME AREAS WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA 697. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, & INFRASTRUCTURE // Page 286 of 585 4 3 2 5 1 Sh 2 5 3 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t Sh 222 Talmage Road Commerce Drive Ru s s i a n R i v e r Low-Income Census Designated Place Low-Income Census Block Group DUCs Highway Rail Line River/Stream City Limits Parcels Source: City of Ukiah, 2019; Mintier Harnish, 2019.0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ FIGURE 7-4: DUCS SOUTH OF UKIAH // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK70 Page 287 of 585 6 8 10 11 9 7 North State Street O r r Springs Road Low Gap Road De s p i n a D r i v e Moore Street R u s s i a n R i v e r Orrs Creek Source: City of Ukiah, 2019; Mintier Harnish, 2019.0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ Low-Income Census Designated Place Low-Income Census Block Group DUCs Highway Rail Line River/Stream City Limits Parcels FIGURE 7-5: DUCS NORTH OF UKIAH 71 Page 288 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK72 Page 289 of 585 8. OPEN SPACE, PARKS, & RECREATION Parks and recreation provide many benefits to a community, including economic, health, environmental, social, and overall quality of life. Open space also serves many important recreational, natural resource, and cultural purposes. It offers places for wildlife habitat, wilderness protection, enhanced groundwater quality, recreational use, historic landscapes, and visual corridors. The Open Space, Parks, and Recreation section outlines existing open space, parks, recreation facilities, and access conditions in Ukiah. 738. OPEN SPACE, PARKS, & RECREATION // Page 290 of 585 Open Space Despite abundant open space in the Ukiah Valley, open space within the city is limited to Ukiah parks (discussed on page 76) and Low Gap Park, an 80-acre open-space park operated by Mendocino County. Located just across Low Gap Road from Ukiah High School, Low Gap park includes formal recreation facilities, including playgrounds, tennis courts, and an archery range. The vast majority of the park, however, is comprised of open space with walking and hiking trails woven throughout. Branching from Low Gap Park, the City View Trail winds its way through the western hills. This approximately 1.5 mile long extension to existing trails in Low Gap Park has been designed by the Ukiah Valley Trails Group for the benefit of the entire community. Intended as a multi-use trail, for hikers and bikers alike, it will offer breath-taking vistas of the Ukiah Valley with an eye toward the preservation and appreciation of native California flora and fauna. Within the Planning Area, open space recreational opportunities exist within County and Federal parks, as well as along the Russian River. Operated by Mendocino County, Mill Creek Park is a 400-acre park consisting of several separate parcels along Mill Creek. Located outside the town of Talmage, the park is situated in a narrow canyon at the foot of Cow Mountain on the eastern side of Ukiah Valley. Mill Creek Park is home to a mixed forest of oak, madrone, bay, and other indigenous trees. Mill Creek runs through the center of the park, and there are several nature trails that lead guests throughout the park's wooded hills, treating them to wildflowers in the spring and spectacular views of Ukiah Valley year-round. There are two Federal open space recreation areas within the Ukiah Planning Area: Lake Mendocino and Cow Mountain. These areas attract Valley residents as well as people from throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. The Lake Mendocino Recreation Area occupies 5,110 acres in the northeastern portion of the Ukiah Valley, including the vast surface area of the lake itself. Operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lake Mendocino is a multi-purpose reservoir, offering day-use facilities, boat launching locations, and overnight campground sites. The 60,000-acre Cow Mountain Recreation Area is located in the Mayacamas Mountains and is managed by the Bureau of Land Management. Approximately 1,296 acres of this area falls within the Ukiah Valley and is accessible from Mill Creek Road. Cow Mountain offers back country recreation such as hiking and horseback riding trails, hunting, camping, and off-highway vehicle use. The Russian River provides various recreational opportunities, such as swimming, fishing, inner tubing and picnicking. Public access to the Russian River is only allowed at specified public access points. There are four public access points to the river near the city of Ukiah: the City’s Softball Complex in the northeast portion of the city, the Vichy Spring-Perkins Road crossing, Riverside Park located at the end of Gobbi Street, and the Talmage Road crossing. Agricultural Lands The Planning Area is home to a number of productive agricultural parcels and hosts one of the largest concentrations of organic farmers in the State. Agricultural land in the plan area is predominately comprised of vineyards and fruit orchards (primarily pear and apple) but also includes other row crops and pasture. Agricultural production has been an important part of the area's economy for generations and agricultural lands provide a pastoral quality that helps define the character of the Ukiah. There is widespread public interest in preserving agricultural lands. Open spaces within the Planning Area, including agricultural lands, are shown on Figure 8-1. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK74 Page 291 of 585 No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Springs R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e No r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Street Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Oak Knoll Roa d Walnut Avenue West Mill Str e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e So u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson St r e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Source: Mendocino County 2019. 0 1 20.5 Miles ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs City Limits Oak Woodlands Public Land Agricultural Land Planning Area/ Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream Cow Mountain Recreation Area (North) Cow Mountain Recreation Area (South) Cow Mountain Recreation Area (North) Cow Mountain Recreation Area (South) Lake Mendocino Recreation Area Lake Mendocino Recreation Area UkiahUkiah 222 253 FIGURE 8-1: OPEN SPACE 758. OPEN SPACE, PARKS, & RECREATION // Page 292 of 585 #Name Type Location 1 Alex Rorabaugh Recreation Center Facility Planning Area 2 Alex Thomas Plaza Facility City of Ukiah 3 Gardner Park Park City of Ukiah 4 Giorno Park / Anton Stadium Park City of Ukiah 5 Rail Trail Trail City of Ukiah 6 Grace Hudson Park Park City of Ukiah 7 Low Gap Park Park City of Ukiah 8 McGarvey Park Park City of Ukiah 9 Oak Manor Park Park City of Ukiah 10 Oak Street Pocket Park Park City of Ukiah 11 Observatory Park Park City of Ukiah 12 Orchard Park Park City of Ukiah 13 Riverside Park Park City of Ukiah 14 Todd Grove Park Park City of Ukiah 15 Ukiah Civic Center Facility City of Ukiah 16 Ukiah Municipal Golf Course Facility City of Ukiah 17 Ukiah Skate Park Park City of Ukiah 18 Ukiah Sports Complex Facility City of Ukiah 19 Ukiah Valley Conference Center Facility City of Ukiah 20 Vinewood Park Park City of Ukiah TABLE 8-1: PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIESParks The City of Ukiah operates approximately 260 acres of parkland, recreational areas, and city facilities that function as community gathering places. Additionally, the County operates an 80-acre open space park in the city. These facilities are shown on Figure 8-2 and in Table 8-1. The 14-acre Alex Rorabaugh Recreation Center includes a meeting room available to the public and a gymnasium. Alex R. Thomas Plaza is a 0.8-acre gathering space with benches, public restrooms, a pavilion, and amphitheater. Facilities are available to rent for the public. Gardner Park is a 0.2-acre park with picnic tables. Giorno Park/Anton Stadium/Lions Field is a 12-acre complex with softball/baseball diamonds and public restrooms. Rail Trail provides two miles of easily accessible and safe alternate modes of transportation for bicycle and pedestrian traffic through downtown Ukiah. Grace Hudson Park "Wild Gardens" is located just north of the museum and recently underwent a transformation into an outdoor art and education space. The wild Gardens feature native plant gardens with exhibits and art that educates about the local environment and how Pomo Indians managed this landscape. Low Gap Park is an 80-acre open space park located in the western hills of Ukiah. The park includes a one-acre off-leash dog park, a picnic area with tables and barbecues, tennis courts, an archery range, horseshoe pits, a disc golf course, and public restrooms. Low Gap Park is operated by Mendocino County. McGarvey Park is approximately one acre and features benches. Oak Manor Park is a four-acre park with playground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, reservable group areas, and tennis courts. Oak Street Pocket Park is home of the Veteran's Garden that provides veterans a space to heal and find camaraderie among other veterans along with healthy food. The park is located on the 900 block of Oak street between Cypress Avenue and Low Gap Road. A walking trail connects pedestrians between Oak and Bush Streets. Observatory Park was opened to the public in March 2014. The 2.5-acre park features a historical observatory, walking labyrinth, and Petanque court. Events within the observatory encourage children and adults to explore space and learn about the solar system. Family- 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 7 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK76 Page 293 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway Parks !Facility !Park Paths and Trails 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ # # 222 7 2 4 68 9 11 14 15 17 20 3 12 13 18 1 16 19 !10 !5 FIGURE 8-2: PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES 778. OPEN SPACE, PARKS, & RECREATION // Page 294 of 585 friendly events include Bounce to the Stars, docent tours, and Open Skies for the amateur astronomer to explore the night sky. Orchard Park is a quarter-acre park with playground equipment and picnic tables. Riverside Park is a 38-acre open space park featuring open grass areas, picnic tables, benches, walking access to the Russian River, and birding opportunities. Todd Grove Park is a 16-acre park with playground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, reservable group areas, and volleyball standards. Located in Todd Grove Park, the Ukiah Municipal Swimming Pools include diving board, concessions, public restrooms, changing rooms, showers, benches, and picnic tables, swimming facilities are open to the public from early June through mid August each year. The Ukiah Civic Center is a 2.5-acre complex with an open space park for recreation or picnicking, benches, and shade areas. The Ukiah Municipal Golf Course is a city-owned 152-acre facility with 18-hole course, pro shop, and snack bar. The Ukiah Skate Park is a 0.6-acre skate park with public restrooms, and benches. The Ukiah Sports Complex is a 10-acre site featuring playground equipment, picnic tables, softball/baseball diamonds, public restrooms, and stands. The Sports Complex also hosts youth soccer, ultimate frisbee, and rugby. The Ukiah Valley Conference Center is a city-owned facility that features meeting rooms, public restrooms, and shops. Vinewood Park is a 4.7-acre park featuring playground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, reservable group areas, and a basketball court. Major Park Improvements In May 2019, Vinewood Park underwent reconstruction to better serve residents. New additions to the park include improved Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)- compliant parking, enlarged and ADA accessible pathways, and a new basketball court. The City is replacing the existing basketball courts and the previously narrow and broken asphalt pathways. In addition, the Grace Hudson Wild Gardens park improvement were completed in 2019. The park was transformed into an outdoor art and education space with an outdoor classroom, a garden of native plants for basket weaving materials and much more. The outdoor classroom offers open-air seating for hands-on learning. The brush arbor is an outdoor community gathering space inspired by traditional Pomo Indian architecture. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK78 Page 295 of 585 Recreation Programs The City of Ukiah Parks and Recreation Department programming seeks to involve all ages and interests. The Department offers a variety of classes under topics such as pet training, dance, music, art, and health and fitness. Additionally, the Department takes suggestions from residents and holds specialized classes based on public input. These classes include topics such as CPR training, babysitting training for teens, life coaching, and women's groups. The Department organizes sports leagues for a variety of ages throughout the year. Current (2019) offerings include ping pong, tennis, soccer, baseball and softball, pickleball, and more. The Ukiah Municipal Swimming Pool is located at Todd Grove Park where residents can take swim lessons and exercise or water recreation classes. Paddle board yoga is also offered on Lake Mendocino during the summer months. Special Events Throughout the year, the City of Ukiah holds special events to build community and encourage outdoor recreation. Events scheduled for the Fall of 2019 include a three-day PumpkinFest (featuring a pumpkin derby, giant pumpkin weigh-off, parade, baking contest, and more), a Thanksgiving break basketball camp, and Ukiah on Ice at Alex R. Thomas Plaza. SUNDAYS IN THE PARK Held by the City each summer, Sundays in the Park Free Concert Series is the largest and most recognized community event in Mendocino County. Since 1991, the series has thrilled the community with exceptional musical performances by artists from diverse genres including blues, classical, country, salsa, soul, rock, swing, reggae and more. Each summer, taking center stage in beautiful Todd Grove Park, six free concerts featuring world-renowned artists as well as local talent, entertain more than 20,000 music fans. 798. OPEN SPACE, PARKS, & RECREATION // Page 296 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK80 Page 297 of 585 9. ENVIRONMENT The Environment section describes the existing conditions related to environmental resources and sustainability in Ukiah. This section includes water quality and supply, air quality, and biological resources. 819. ENVIRONMENT // Page 298 of 585 Water Quality The City of Ukiah draws its water from the Russian River and three active groundwater wells. Water derived from each well varies depending on demand and the time of the year. According to annual water quality testing reports, the City of Ukiah’s water quality is considered to be safe and reliable. During emergencies, the City of Ukiah has the ability to purchase water from neighboring water systems: Millview County Water District and Willow County Water District. As of 2019, the City reported that the water that it produces and distributes meets and exceeds State and Federal standards for drinking water quality. These results are published each year in the Annual Water Quality Report. Water Recycling Water recycling is reusing treated wastewater for beneficial purposes such as agricultural and landscape irrigation, industrial processes, toilet flushing, and replenishing a ground water basin (referred to as ground water recharge). By providing an additional source of water, water recycling can decrease the diversion of water from sensitive ecosystems, decrease wastewater discharges, and reduce pollution. Recycled water can also be used to create or enhance wetlands and riparian habitats. The City of Ukiah has finished construction of its recycled water system. Phases 1-3 are complete and produce recycled water for customers including agriculture, industrial uses, and landscaping, including a variety of municipal agencies. Phases 1-3 can return approximately two-thirds of the plant's capacity to beneficial use. Phase 4 has been designed and funding is being identified to complete this final phase. Phase 4 is designed to subscribe 100 percent of the treatment plant's capacity. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK82 Page 299 of 585 Air Quality Overall air quality in the Planning Area is generally good when compared with statewide and nationwide averages. Similar to the rest of California, ozone and particulate matter are the pollutants of most concern in the area. Air quality monitoring in the Ukiah area reports particulate matter from 2015 to 2017 did not exceed California standards for more than eight days in a year. Ozone pollution in the area has been well below the average national and State thresholds. Major pollution sources for the city of Ukiah are transportation emissions such as diesel particulate matter. Biological Habitat The City has protected several types of oak species in an effort to revitalize the neighboring oak forest. Protected tree species in the city are black oak, blue oak, coast live oak, cork oak, interior live oak, oracle oak, Oregon oak, valley oak, white oak, native California oak, California buckeye, California bay, and California/coast redwood. Trees on the protected species list include designated landmark trees, trees in riparian corridors, and trees planted as part of mitigation efforts or conditions of approval. Species listed as threatened or endangered within the Planning Area include the northern spotted owl, foothill yellow-legged frog, red- bellied newt, chinook salmon, and steelhead trout. Riparian woodland and riparian forest along the Russian River (Figure 9-1) provide habitat for naturally occurring plant species including box elder, button willow, blackberry, wild rose, wild grape, and coyote bush. Wetlands within city limits are on the Parducci Wine Cellars’ grounds. Air quality issues following the 2018 Camp Fire closed Mendocino County Schools and many government offices. This white oak in Todd Grove Park is one of the few remaining large oaks in the park. 839. ENVIRONMENT // Page 300 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stree t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stree t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t S o u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t Source: Mintier Harnish, 2019. 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k Box Elder Button Willow Blackberry Coyote Bush Wild Rose No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Spring s R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e N o r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stree t Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Street Oak Knoll Roa d Walnut Avenue West Mill Str e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson St r e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. 0 1 20.5 Miles Date: July 31, 2019. ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Figure: Boundaries City Limits Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream UkiahUkiah 222 253 No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Spring s R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t No r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e N o r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Street Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Street Oak Knoll Road Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t Hi g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson Str e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. 0 1 20.5 Miles Date: July 31, 2019. ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Figure: Boundaries City Limits Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream UkiahUkiah 222 253 Russian River Riparian Areas No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Spring s R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e No r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Street Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Street Oak Knoll Road Walnut Avenue West Mill Str e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t Hi g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson Str e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. 0 1 20.5 Miles Date: July 31, 2019. ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Figure: Boundaries City Limits Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream UkiahUkiah 222 253 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stree t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stree t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t S o u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t Source: Mintier Harnish, 2019. 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k FIGURE 9-1: RUSSIAN RIVER RIPARIAN PLANT SPECIES Source: Mintier Harnish, 2019. So u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Stree t Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t Source: Mintier Harnish, 2019. 00.5 10.25 Miles ¯ R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK84 Page 301 of 585 859. ENVIRONMENT // Page 302 of 585 // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK86 Page 303 of 585 10. HAZARDS & SAFETY Natural hazards in the Ukiah region are similar to those in the greater northern California area. Earthquake, wildfire, and drought are of the highest concerns, as well as an increased number of high heat days and localized flooding. 8710. HAZARDS & SAFETY // Page 304 of 585 Earthquakes Earthquake severity is measured by the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale. The MMI measures ground shaking severity at a given site according to damage done to structures, changes in the earth surface, and personal accounts. An earthquake’s ground motion is what will cause building and infrastructure damage along fault lines. The MMI scale is illustrated in the graphic on the right. Peak ground acceleration (PGA) is used to measure earthquake intensity by quantifying how hard the earth shakes in a given location. The closest fault zone to Ukiah is the Maacama Fault Zone, which is approximately 2 miles east of the city limits. In the event of an earthquake, Ukiah would experience strong shaking (level of VI on the MMI scale) with a peak ground acceleration rating of 80, which would result in quick acceleration of the earth. Such an earthquake can result in considerable damage to poorly built or designed structures, and slight damage to buildings designed to withstand severe ground shaking. Actual damage caused is dependent on the severity of the earthquake, the specific buildings and infrastructure involved, and other various factors. Figure 10-1 shows seismic hazards and peak ground acceleration in the Ukiah Planning Area. Liquefaction occurs when seismic waves pass through granular soil, causing some of the empty spaces between granules to collapse and can cause severe damage to properties. It is the act of a soil’s behavior becoming similar to liquid due to ground shaking from an earthquake. During an earthquake, the area of Ukiah is not highly susceptible to liquefaction; however, there may be moderate risk of liquefaction along creeks and rivers. Maacama fault produced a reported 5.6 earthquake in the Ukiah area in 1869 as well as an abundance of microquakes in recent years. Earthquake Hazard and Probability Maps produced by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) show that the entire population, all non-critical facilities, and all critical facilities and infrastructure in Ukiah is located within a violent shaking range (78-100 percent acceleration due to gravity). WHAT IS THE MODIFIED MERCALI INTENSITY SCALE (MMI) MMI measures ground shaking severity at a given site according to damage done to structures, changes in earth surface and personal accounts. In the event of a large earthquake, Ukiah is expected to experience an intensity of VI on the MMI, which would be expected to result in strong shaking. MMI Shaking I Not Felt II-III Weak IV Light V Moderate VI Strong VII Very Strong VIII Severe IX Violent X, XI, XII Extreme // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK88 Page 305 of 585 No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Ol d R i v e r R o a d Orr Springs R o a d Low Gap R o a d Mill C r e e k R o a d E a s t R o a d S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Vichy S p r i n g s R o a d E a s t S i d e C a l p e l l a R o a d Re d e m e y e r R o a d School Way We s t R o a d So u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t Eas t S i d e P o t t e r V a l l e y R o a d W a t s o n R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e Lake M e n d o c i n o D r i v e No r t h O a k S t r e e t Lovers Lane East Gobbi Street East Perkins Street Moore Street K n o b H i l l R o a d Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Oak Knoll Roa d Walnut Avenue West Mill Str e e t Sa n f o r d R a n c h R o a d Grove Avenue So u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e So u t h M a i n S t r e e t No r t h M a i n S t r e e t Oak C o u r t R o a d A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d West Gobbi S t r e e t H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue West Stephenson St r e e t F i r s t A v e n u e So u t h D o r a S t r r e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Lake Mendocino Drive Rus s i a n R i v e r Orrs C r e e k Source: Mendocino County, California Geological Survey, 2019; USGS, Earthquake Hazard and Probability Maps, 2014. 0 1 20.5 Miles ¯ Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs Redwood Valley Calpella The Forks Regina Heights Talmage El Roble Presswood Vichy Springs City Limits Planning Area/ Sphere of Influence Highway Road Rail Line River/Stream Fault Zone 50-60 >100 78-100 Fault Trace Lake PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION Percent of Gravity LAKE M E N D O C I N O M A A C A M A F A U L T M A A C A M A F A U L T UkiahUkiah 222 253 FIGURE 10-1: SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT 8910. HAZARDS & SAFETY // Page 306 of 585 Wildfire Regionally, the Ukiah Planning Area is near other zones of high or very high wildfire severity to the west, southwest, and northwest, although there is less of a threat from those areas because of their relative distance from Ukiah. Brush fires in the area are common during the summer but are generally extinguished before developed areas sustain much damage. While the city is not in an area of high fire hazard severity, Ukiah’s proximity to the Mendocino Range does pose a threat of wildfire spreading into the city where the range meets the western portion of the city limits. California law requires CAL FIRE to identify the severity of fire hazard statewide. CAL FIRE identified Fire Hazard Severity Zones based on factors such as fuel, slope of the land and fire weather. CAL FIRE assigns responsibility for each zone to either the State or a local jurisdiction. Fire hazard severity zones near the city of Ukiah are shown on Figure 10-2. Previous large fires in the surrounding area also posed a threat to the city of Ukiah, such as the Mendocino Complex Fire (Ranch Fire). The Ranch Fire began off Highway 20 near Potter Valley just northeast of Ukiah in the summer of 2018 and was not fully extinguished until the beginning of 2019. The fire burned a total of 410,203 acres throughout Mendocino, Lake, Colusa, and Glenn counties. Ukiah's geography and proximity to wildlands puts the city in danger. The State's Fire-Hazard Severity Map shows the city is surrounded. In 2019, CAL FIRE, Mendocino County, and the City of Ukiah established fire breaks along the western hills to prevent a catastrophic fire from escaping the wildlands and traveling through the city. Droughts California is susceptible to dry periods, and times of extended drought are likely to occur in the future. Drought is a result of lower than average rainfall over extended periods of time. Projections show average annual precipitation in the area could decrease from 39.6 inches per year to 32.7 inches per year over the next 20 years. This reduction in rainfall would be worsened by a similar reduction in Sierra snowpack in the future, which provides much of the water for California in dry summer months. Droughts may therefore become more prevalent in future decades and Ukiah is likely to be affected. Between 2011 and 2014, the State of California experienced the driest period in recorded history. The resulting drought lasted from 2012 to 2017, dried up wells, and killed millions of trees. The California Drought Monitor designated Mendocino County in a "severe drought" in April 2013 and County Supervisors declared a drought emergency by January 2014. After nearly three years of drought, the County was downgraded from drought conditions in March 2016 following a series of El Nino driven winter storms. Although most areas of the State were out of drought conditions by 2017, the State of California wasn't declared totally drought-free until March 2019. // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK90 Page 307 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k Source: CAL FIRE, Fire Hazard Severity Zones, osfm.fire.ca.gov City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 STATE FIRE HAZARDSEVERITY ZONES Very High High Moderate CITY FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES Very High High Moderate FIGURE 10-2: FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES 9110. HAZARDS & SAFETY // Page 308 of 585 Extreme Heat Events An extreme heat day is defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as any day where temperatures reach above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperatures above 90 degrees are associated with health risks especially for seniors, those with respiratory concerns, and other sensitive groups. Ukiah averages approximately 63 days of extreme heat annually , as well as occasionally experiencing heat waves where more than four extreme heat days occur consecutively. Cal-Adapt projections show that the average of both extreme heat days and heat waves in Ukiah is expected to increase substantially, with an average of 79 extreme heat days expected by the year 2040. Flooding Major flood-related concerns in the Ukiah Valley include flooding as a result of heavy storms and the potential failure of the Coyote Dam at the base of Lake Mendocino. Ukiah is primarily susceptible to flooding on the eastern border of the city limits, although localized flooding may occur in other areas. Areas within a 100-year floodplain have a 1 percent chance each year of flooding, while areas in a 500-year floodplain have a 0.2 percent chance each year of flooding. The 100-year and 500-year floodplain extends the length of Russian River from the northeastern city limits through the southeastern city limits of Ukiah (Figure 10- 3). Areas within the city limits along Gibson Creek and Doolin Creek are in the 100-year and 500-year floodplain as well. According to the Ukiah Valley Area Plan, in the event of a hypothetical total dam failure, water would flow north up the Russian River channel to a point north of Highway 20 before stopping, and south well past the boundaries of the Ukiah Planning Area. The main channel of flooding would likely follow U.S. 101 or State Street, whichever is further west. In the southern portions of the Valley, the Army Corps projects that most segments of U.S. 101 south of Talmage Road will be under water and that the community of Talmage would likely have portions of its west side inundated. Resiliency Efforts in Ukiah Ukiah seeks to keep residents and assets as safe as possible in the event of a disaster through land use controls, hazard mitigation and emergency response efforts, and community programs. The City also works with Mendocino County on a number of plans and programs. Resiliency efforts in Ukiah include: • Participation in the Mendocino County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan • Participation in the North Coast Opportunities Disaster Preparedness Training Programs • Trainings for residents in Community Preparedness and Resilience Skills • Upgrades to buildings and infrastructure to comply with building and fire codes • Supporting the Mendocino County Emergency Services Division • Water conservation measures and programs • Support for and information on creating a Family Disaster Plan for residents • Fire breaks installed in western hills in 2019 by CAL FIRE, Mendocino County, and the City of Ukiah • Controlled burn days by CAL FIRE // UKIAH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK92 Page 309 of 585 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t Low Ga p R o a d S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t No r t h S t a t e S t r e e t De s p i n a D r i v e Red e m e y e r R o a d N o r t h O a k S t r e e t East Gobbi Street East Perkins Stre e t Talmage Road West Perkins Stree t Walnut Avenue West Mill St r e e t Grove Avenue S o u t h O a k S t r e e t Empire Drive Ma s o n S t r e e t West Standley Stre e t Henry Street So u t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e No r t h O r c h a r d A v e n u e Li v e O a k A v e n u e S o u t h M a i n S t r e e t N o r t h M a i n S t r e e t S o u t h S c h o o l S t r e e t West Smith Street A i r p o r t P a r k B o u l e v a r d Commerce Drive West Church Street Washington Avenue Clara Avenue H i g h l a n d A v e n u e Cypress Avenue S o u t h S p r i n g S t r e e t So u t h D o r a S t r r e t East Mill Street S o u t h D o r a S t r e e t R u s s i a n R i v e r Orr s C r e e k Source: City of Ukiah, 2019. City Limits River/Stream Rail Line Highway 100-Year Floodplain 500-Year Floodplain 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ 222 FIGURE 10-3: FLOOD HAZARD ZONES 9310. HAZARDS & SAFETY // Page 310 of 585 Draft General Plan Vision Statements January 2020 January 2020 Page 1 of 1 Draft General Plan Vision Statements The following are four draft General Plan Vision Statements that were developed based on key terms used by community members to express their vision of Ukiah in 2040. The GREEN highlighted words in each Vision Statement are the community’s key terms, as identified at Community Workshop #1, PumpkinFest, and through online engagement. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #1 The City of Ukiah will be an engaging city that prioritizes being a connected community built on a foundation of active public participation and maintaining a transparent local government. We will strive to enhance overall connectivity in the City by encouraging a more bikeable and walkable environment. We will continue to promote lifelong learning and education excellence and accessibility for all age groups. Ukiah will be a city that values economic diversity in a business-friendly environment. Overall, we aspire to be a resilient community, one that is fiscally responsible, environmentally conscious, and sustainably focused. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #2 Ukiah will be a welcoming and diverse city that values and promotes community safety, education, and overall community health. The city will continue to maintain and enhance its local parks and support community events that are inclusive. Ukiah will be a sustainable community focusing on resiliency and protection of our natural environment. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #3 The City of Ukiah will be a proactive and vibrant community that prides itself on diversity, safety, and transparency for all community members. We will protect our natural resources by encouraging sustainably focused development and resilient infrastructure that enhances the community while preserving valuable open space. We will seek to be a leader in the region by providing social services and economic and recreation opportunities that benefit everyone and celebrate Ukiah as a unique place to live and visit. Draft General Plan Vision Statement #4 The City of Ukiah is a diverse, family-oriented, and friendly community that is connected to the beautiful, surrounding natural open space areas that give the community its unique focus and sense of place. Ukiah is a resilient community that is fiscally responsible, environmentally conscious, and inclusive. The city offers a great place for people of all ages, incomes, and ethnicities to live, work, and visit. Attachment 2 Page 311 of 585 RECOMMENDED 2040 GENERAL PLAN VISION STATEMENT The City of Ukiah is a diverse, family‐oriented, and friendly community connected to the beautiful, surrounding natural open space areas that give the community its unique sense of place. Ukiah is a safe and resilient community that is fiscally responsible, environmentally conscious, and inclusive. The city offers a great place for people of all ages, incomes, and ethnicities to live, work, and visit. Attachment 3 Page 312 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 12.c. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-734 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Council Update on the Status and History of the Proposed Roundabout at the Intersection of Low Gap Road and Bush Street and then to Consider Directing City Staff to Proceed with Application to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for Funding Phase Changes. DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Jason Benson, Senior Civil Engineer PRESENTER: Tim Eriksen ATTACHMENTS: 1. GHD_Ukiah School Traffic Analysis_Final Report_ 18DEC2020 2. US DOT_Federal Highway Administration_Mini-Roundabouts 3. Minnesota DOT_St. James Mini-Roundabout 4. Ravensworth Road intersection of Fountain Head Dr – Jayhawk St_Annandale, VA Summary: The City Council will review the proposed Low Gap Road and Bush Street Roundabout project, and provide Staff input for the future direction of this intersection. Background: The City has worked with Mendocino Council Of Governments (MCOG) and Ukiah Unified School District (UUSD) to find solutions to the traffic issues that occur in the AM Peak when school is in session. The intersection of Low Gap Road and Bush Street has long-been a difficult, congested area during peak hours, as identified in the City’s Citywide Circulation Study, adopted February 2007. A subsequent in- depth study by GHD, “Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas,” (Attachment 1) completed in December 2020, recommends construction of either a roundabout or a traffic signal at the Low Gap Road and Bush Street intersection: “A single lane roundabout is recommended to improve circulation and reduce queueing. This improvement will also reduce conflict points for pedestrians crossing the intersection, and reduce the crossing distance at any one time (see Figure 2 of Attachment #1). A traffic signal was considered at this location, but is not the preferred alternative at this time. Analysis of traffic operations with a signal at this location is included in Appendix C of Attachment #1.” Since the adoption of the Study, Staff has continued to explore improvements at this intersection, including possible grant funding opportunities. Project Funding History: On December 7, 2015, the Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG) Board adopted the 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), which was developed using a Fund Estimate (FE) adopted by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in August of 2015. That FE provided no funding capacity for new programming, and identified a funding shortfall in the early years of the five-year Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) period. In response to that FE, the Mendocino County 2016 RTIP proposed delays of many locally funded projects. At the February 3, 2016, meeting Staff provided an update to City Council regarding the proposed amendment Page 313 of 585 Page 2 of 2 to the MCOG RTIP project funding. Since then, there have been further developments in RTIP funding. Funding for the various RTIP projects can be used only for the specified RTIP project. If an agency decides not to use the funding for the specified project, then the funding is reprogrammed to MCOG or the State for use on projects in other jurisdictions. At the MCOG board meeting on April 12, 2016, Staff heard a presentation regarding the revision to the first amendment of the RTIP. At the April 12th meeting, MCOG staff stated that funding (environmental, design, and right of way) for the N. Bush Street and Low Gap Road roundabout has been restored to the 2016 RTIP. However, the 2016 RTIP is being amended to delete the construction funding for the roundabout. Proceeding with the environmental and design phases of the project will allow the City to fully vet the design and functionality of the roundabout solution at this intersection. Discussion: Since 2016, Engineering Staff has had several meetings with stakeholders and performed a great deal of preliminary engineering to find a solution to the issue at this intersection. It is clear from initial investigations with several private engineering firms that the allotment of design funds available for this project is inadequate. Currently, there is $115,000 available for engineering and right-of-way. Engineering Staff has determined that this amount should be $300,000. It is also clear that the traditional roundabout is not likely a solution for this intersection. Engineering Staff has provided attachments (Attachment 2 and Attachment 3) for examples of the likely solution for this intersection. The examples are “mini-roundabouts” discussed in a technical summary provided by the US Department of Transportation (DOT) and a constructed example in St. James Minnesota provided by the Minnesota DOT. This option, which utilizes more paint and less concrete, is a less expensive solution (see Attachment 4). Analysis from Engineering Staff has determined that the new construction costs are estimated to be approximately $500,000. This shows that the gross project costs including Engineering and Construction are in the neighborhood of the original grant amount of $896,000. However, the available funding is in the wrong project phases. Engineering Staff has discussed this issue with MCOG Staff. These funding changes are possible but require action by the California Transportation Commission (CTC). An application needs to be filed immediately for these changes. Therefore, City Staff is seeking City Council authorization to submit an application to the CTC for modification of funding related to the proposed project. Recommended Action: Authorize Staff to submit an application to the CTC for modification of funding related to the proposed project. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: $0 CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: $0 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: $0 FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Page 314 of 585 GHD | City of Ukiah | 11176246 | 104 | Report No. 1 | December 18, 2020 Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas City of Ukiah Final Report ATTACHMENT 1 Page 315 of 585 GHD | City of Ukiah | 11176246 | 104 | Report No. 1 | December 18, 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Planning and Policy Context .............................................................................................. 3 2. Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Activity Generators ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Existing Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 4 1. Street Network .......................................................................................................... 4 2. Pedestrian Network ................................................................................................... 4 3. Bicycle Network ......................................................................................................... 5 4. Transit Network ......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Existing Traffic Operations Analysis .................................................................................. 5 1. Level of Service ......................................................................................................... 5 2. Queues ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Collisions ............................................................................................................................ 8 3. Needs & Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Recommended Improvements ......................................................................................... 10 1. North State Street at Empire Drive ......................................................................... 10 2. North State Street at Brush Street .......................................................................... 10 3. North Bush Street at Low Gap Road ...................................................................... 10 4. Despina Drive at Low Gap Road ............................................................................ 12 5. Despina Drive at Capps Lane ................................................................................. 16 6. Despina Drive at Empire Drive ................................................................................ 16 7. Empire Drive ........................................................................................................... 18 8. Low Gap Road ........................................................................................................ 18 9. North Bush Street near Arlington Drive ................................................................... 18 10. Ukiah High School Parking Lots ............................................................................. 19 Page 316 of 585 GHD | City of Ukiah | 11176246 | 104 | Report No. 1 | December 18, 2020 Figure Index Figure 1: Improvement Map ................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2: North Bush Street at Low Gap Road – Roundabout Improvement Concept ........................ 11 Figure 3: Despina Drive at Low Gap Road – Roundabout Improvement Concept .............................. 13 Figure 4: Despina Drive at Low Gap Road – Curb Extension Concept ............................................... 14 Figure 5: Despina Drive at Low Gap Road – Traffic Signal Improvement Concept ............................. 15 Figure 6: Despina Drive at Capps Lane – Curb Extensions Improvement Concept ............................ 17 Figure 7: Ukiah High School Parking Lot Improvement Concept ......................................................... 20 Table Index Table 1: Existing Intersection Operations .............................................................................................. 6 Table 2: Existing School Year Queue Lengths ...................................................................................... 7 Appendix Index Appendix A Traffic Operations Analysis Figures Appendix B Traffic Counts and Turning Movements Appendix C Synchro and Sim Traffic Outputs Appendix D Design Recommendations Appendix E Signal Timing Page 317 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 3 1.Introduction The City of Ukiah Department of Public Works retained GHD to provide a comprehensive traffic analysis of schools in northwest Ukiah and their immediate surroundings to identify safety and congestion issues. This report presents existing conditions, needs, and recommended improvements for walking, bicycling, and driving in northwest Ukiah. 1.1 Planning and Policy Context This report builds on previous planning efforts in the Ukiah community, helping the City fulfill its goal to improve the quality of life for residents by providing safer and better connected transportation networks (City of Ukiah Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan). Two intersections in the project area have already been identified or programmed for improvements. New signal poles were recently installed at the intersection of North State Street and Low Gap Road that include left turn signal heads and allow for an eight-phase cycle. The intersection of North Bush Street and Low Gap Road has been identified as a potential roundabout location, with $115,000 funded through the City’s Short-Range Improvement Program. Recommended improvements draw from these and other existing plans, including the Ukiah Safe Routes to School Plan and the Ukiah Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Improving multimodal connectivity, particularly near schools, is an explicit goal in several local and regional plans. The Mendocino County Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program and City of Ukiah Safe Routes to School Plan both seek to improve the quality of life for students by promoting physical activity and improving air quality The 2017 Mendocino County Regional Transportation Plan notes a need for intersection improvements along North State Street in the study area, among other transportation improvements The 2017 Mendocino County Active Transportation Plan presents a regional framework for improving bicycling, walking, and transit throughout the county The City of Ukiah Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan includes policies and infrastructure recommendations to improve conditions for bicycling and walking in the City and create a better connected network for active transportation The City of Ukiah General Plan Circulation Element and the City of Ukiah Citywide Circulation Study provide objectives and policies related to level of service (LOS) and model existing and future circulation and operations Page 318 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 4 2.Existing Conditions 2.1 Activity Generators Public schools located in the project area include Ukiah High School, Frank Zeek Elementary School, and Orr Creek School for Special Education. The Ukiah Adult School and Ukiah Independent Study Academy are also located in the project area, but may have atypical transportation patterns compared to other campuses. The Ukiah Unified School District recently altered the schedule for many of the schools in their district in an attempt to alleviate congestion by staggering start times. In addition, several Mendocino County administration facilities and offices are located in the study area. These include the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office, Juvenile Hall, and Probation Services; Mendocino County Planning and Building Services; County Administration offices; and General Services. These facilities are located primarily along the south side of Low Gap Road. 2.2 Existing Infrastructure 1.Street Network The study area includes streets from local to arterial roadways. Regional access is provided primarily by US 101. Circulation within the study area is provided by the following streets. North State Street is a four-lane, north-south, undivided arterial roadway that runs between Low Gap Road and Empire Drive within the study area. State Street is the primary connector between northern and southern Ukiah. Low Gap Road is a two-lane, east-west, undivided major collector facility that runs between State Street and Despina Drive within the study area. Despina Drive is a two-lane, north-south, undivided residential roadway that runs between Low Gap Road and Empire Drive within the study area. Despina Drive currently has a speed limit of 25 MPH. North Bush Street is a two-lane, north-south, undivided residential roadway that runs between, Low Gap Road and Empire Drive within the study area. Frank Zeek Elementary School and the Ukiah Adult School are both present along North Bush Street. Empire Drive is a two-lane, east-west, undivided residential roadway that runs between Despina Drive and North State Street. Empire Drive currently has a speed limit of 25 MPH. 2. Pedestrian Network Sidewalks are present along all roadways in the study area, with no notable gaps in pedestrian facilities. In some areas, utility poles, sign posts, and other obstructions reduce the passable width of sidewalks below minimums required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These Page 319 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 5 obstructions were primarily observed in the project area on Low Gap Road and on North State Street. Marked crosswalks are provided along North State Street at the intersections of Empire Drive, Bricarelli Drive, and Low Gap Road. Yellow school crosswalks are marked at the following intersections: North State Street and Mazzoni Street North State Street and Magnolia Street North Bush Street and Low Gap Road North Bush Street and Arlington Drive Midblock on Low Gap Road near the Mendocino County Jail driveway Despina Drive and Low Gap Road Despina Drive and Capps Lane Despina Drive and Empire Drive 3.Bicycle Network Class II bicycle lanes currently exist in the study area along Low Gap Road, Despina Drive, and North Bush Street. Except for a segment of Low Gap Road west of North Bush Street, all streets with bicycle lanes also have on-street parking. At the intersection of North Bush Street and Low Gap Road, gaps are created in the bikeway network when bicycle lanes on all approaches end 100 to 250 feet before the intersection. 4.Transit Network Mendocino Transit Authority provides transit service on two local routes within Ukiah and three regional routes that offer connections to nearby destinations. The Ukiah Unified School District also operates eleven school bus routes within the community. Transit stops in the project area are located near each school and along North Bush Street and North State Street. 2.3 Existing Traffic Operations Analysis 1. Level of Service Traffic operations are measured using “Level of Service” (LOS), a qualitative metric for traffic conditions. Letter grades A through F are assigned to intersections or roadway segments and represent progressively worsening traffic conditions. In general, LOS A represents free-flow conditions with very little delay, and LOS F represents over-capacity conditions with long delays and queues. Page 320 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 6 Mendocino County’s Ukiah Valley Area Plan establishes standards for acceptable LOS that apply to multiple intersections in this project area: For State Routes and all Mendocino County arterials and collectors, LOS D is acceptable For local roads, LOS C is acceptable The City of Ukiah General Plan includes interim standards for acceptable LOS that apply to this project: At signalized or all-way stop controlled intersections, LOS D is acceptable At intersections with stop controls only on side streets, LOS E is acceptable, except where side streets have very low traffic volumes and LOS F conditions may be acceptable Six intersections in the study area were selected for analysis using existing traffic volumes, intersection controls, and lane geometries. Table 1 presents selected intersection operations for AM and PM peak hours under both school year and summer conditions. Table 1: Existing Intersection Operations # Intersection Control Type1,2 School Year Summer AM PM AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 N State St & Empire Dr Signal 44.4 D 35.7 D 17.6 B 22.0 C 2 N State St & Low Gap Rd Signal 19.4 B 20.4 C 17.4 B 21.7 C 3 N Bush St & Low Gap Rd AWSC 31.7 D 32.9 D 12.4 B 11.8 B 4 Despina Dr & Low Gap Rd AWSC 16.9 C 15.4 C 8.1 A 7.3 A 5 Despina Dr & Capps Ln TWSC 33.0 D 20.1 C 9.5 A 9.9 A 6 Despina Dr & Empire Dr TWSC 22.3 C 13.3 B 9.5 A 9.0 A As shown in Table 1, three intersections were found to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the school year: North State Street and Empire Drive operates at LOS D due to high eastbound left-turn volumes on Empire Drive North Bush Street and Low Gap Road operates at LOS D due to low peak hour factors on some movements Despina Drive and Capps Lane operates at LOS D due to heavy school traffic on Despina Drive making it difficult to turn off of Capps Lane Page 321 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 7 All study intersections currently operate at or above acceptable LOS during summer months, likely due to the absence of regular school-related traffic. Additional detail on this traffic operations analysis is provided in Appendix A. Traffic counts and turning movements are documented in Appendix B, and model outputs are provided in Appendix C. 2.Queues Due to the complex interaction between the pedestrians, vehicles, and school crossing guard at the intersections of N. Bush Street & Low Gap Road, a SimTraffic analysis was performed to determine the impact these various modes have on the circulation system. The SimTraffic model was modified to better align with what was observed in the field. Due to the limitations of the program, the AM peak hour queues reported in SimTraffic do not match the observed AM peak hour queues. Table 2 presents the Existing School Year Queue Lengths in the AM and PM peak hours. Table 2: Existing School Year Queue Lengths # Intersection/Approach Control Type1,2 Existing School Year 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Available Storage AM PM 3 N Bush St & Low Gap Rd AWSC Eastbound Left 94 145 115 Eastbound Through/Right 227 371 Westbound Left 100 72 110 Westbound Through/Right 143 119 Northbound Left 101 87 75 Northbound Through 102 154 Northbound Right 5 88 75 Southbound Left 59 56 105 Southbound Through 103 110 Southbound Right 57 36 80 4 Despina Dr & Low Gap Rd AWSC Eastbound Left/Through 107 107 Westbound Through/Right 141 94 Southbound Left/Right 97 80 Queues are mostly acceptable, with the exception of the eastbound through lane at the intersection of N Bush Street and Low Gap Road. The queues exceed the available storage of the turn pocket for the northbound left lane during both the AM and PM peak hour, and for the eastbound left and northbound right lanes during the PM peak hour. Based on field observations, there are extensive queues at the above study intersections that were not reflected in the modeled queue lengths. At the intersection of N. Bush Street & Low Gap Road the eastbound, westbound, and southbound queues exceed capacity. This is largely due to the Page 322 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 8 number of pedestrians and the crossing guard. Despite the crossing guard only motioning to stop traffic in two directions, the entire intersection would stop instead, bring all traffic to a standstill while students crossed. This, coupled with slow decision-making at the intersection, greatly increased the queue length compared to what was simulated. At the intersection of Despina Drive & Low Gap Road, there was a consistently long queue in the westbound direction. The queue in the eastbound direction did not appear until after the school had officially started and is due to the vehicles that dropped off students at the school. The long westbound queue is due to a combination of students crossing and slow decision-making at the intersection. 2.4 Collisions Collisions at the intersections in the study area were reviewed for the period of 2011 to 2017 from both the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). The collisions during this period can be summarized as follows: 1. North State Street and Empire Drive: four injury collisions, three of which involved pedestrians. One severe injury, two visible injury, one complaint of pain. There were also three property damage only collisions. 2. North State Street and Low Gap Road: four visible injury and five complain of pain collisions. In addition, nine property damage only collisions were reported. 3. North Bush Street and Low Gap Road: one property damage only collision. 4. Despina Drive and Low Gap Road: one severe injury just north of the intersection, and one property damage only collision. 5. Despina Drive and Capps Lane: one visible injury, and two complaint of pain injury collisions, both of which involved pedestrians. 6. Despina Drive and Empire Drive: one property damage only collision. 3.Needs & Recommendations Recommended infrastructure improvements are described in the following chapter, along with a summary of the challenge or concern that each improvement is intended to address. Recommendations are organized by numbered locations that correspond to intersection numbers from Table 1 and add additional numbers for other spot or corridor locations. Figure 1 on the following page presents a concept-level overview of recommended improvements. Where applicable, designs for individual recommendations are provided in additional detail. These detailed concepts are also presented in Appendix D. Page 323 of 585 0 500250 Feet . Low G a p R o a d Low G a p R o a d De s p i n a D r i v e De s p i n a D r i v e N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t N o r t h B u s h S t r e e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t N o r t h S t a t e S t r e e t Capps LaneCapps Lane Arlington DriveArlington Drive Empire DriveEmpire Drive Brush StreetBrush Street Figure 1: Ukiah School Improvement Map DRAFT 1 12 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 6 5 4 North State Street at Empire Drive and at Brush Street - Improvements are part of the North State Street Study Project North Bush Street and Low Gap Road - Consider installing a single-lane roundabout or traffic signal Despina Drive and Low Gap Road - Consider installing a single-lane roundabout or traffic signal Despina Drive and Capps Lane - Install curb extensions on all corners, including between the two crosswalks on the west side of the intersection - Upgrade marked crosswalks to yellow high visibility crosswalks - Improve pedestrian gate and path onto school campus to meet ADA accessibility standards Despina Drive and Empire Drive - Install curb extensions on both ends of east and south leg marked crosswalks - Upgrade marked crosswalks to yellow high visibility crosswalks Empire Drive - Install Class III Bicycle Route signs every 300-500 feet Low Gap Road - Install Class II Buffered Bicycle Lanes North Bush Street near Arlington Drive - Install curb extension on the west side of the intersection - Upgrade marked crosswalks at intersec- tion to yellow high visibility crosswalks - Mark yellow high visibility crosswalks across school driveways south of Arlington Drive Ukiah High School Parking Lot - Mark yellow high visibility crosswalk across all driveways - Install green conflict markings for bicycle lanes at driveways - Mark yellow high visibility crosswalk and install RRFB at pedestrian pathway Recommended Improvements Curb Extension High Visibility Crosswalk Class I Shared Use Path Class II Buffered Bike Lanes Class III Bicycle Route Green Conflict Markings Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Roundabout or Signal North State Street Project Page 324 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 10 3.1 Recommended Improvements 1.North State Street at Empire Drive Improvements are being developed at this location as part of the North State Street Study Project. 2.North State Street at Brush Street Improvements are being developed at this location as part of the North State Street Study Project. 3.North Bush Street at Low Gap Road Challenges Yellow transverse crosswalks are marked on all legs of the intersection, and all approaches are stop controlled. On the northwest side of the intersection, a pedestrian refuge “pork chop” exists between the southbound right turn and through lanes. There is sufficient pedestrian traffic during morning and afternoon periods, and sufficient vehicular traffic, to have a crossing guard stationed at the northwest corner of the intersection. The current crossing guard typically crosses both the north east/west leg and the west north/south leg, waiting on the “pork chop.” Morning and afternoon queueing have been documented. Recommendations A single lane roundabout is recommended to improve circulation and reduce queueing. This improvement will also reduce conflict points for pedestrians crossing the intersection, and reduce the crossing distance at any one time. See Figure 2. A traffic signal was considered at this location, but is not the preferred alternative at this time. Analysis of traffic operations with a signal at this location is included in Appendix C. Page 325 of 585 0 1 inch = ft. 50'50' 50 INTERSECTION #3 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT N N O R T H B U S H S T R E E T NO R T H P I N E S T R E E T Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 11:13 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.12.19 Source: FIGURE 2 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE LO W G A P R O A D 10' MULTI-USE PATH BIKE RAMP (TYP) CURB RAMP (TYP) 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER CENTRAL ISLAND TRUCK APRON 10' MULTI-USE PATH 10' MULTI-USE PATH 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH RAISED SLITTER ISLAND (TYP) R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 20' 20' Page 326 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 12 4.Despina Drive at Low Gap Road Challenges Yellow transverse crosswalks exist on the eastern and northern legs of this intersection; a yellow crosswalk with zebra markings is located on the western leg. All three approaches are stop controlled. A single diagonal curb ramp exists at each northern corner, and a single perpendicular curb ramp exists on both south corner. The northwest corner, at the High School parking lot, allows for unconstrained turning movements and provides enough room for right turning vehicles to pull alongside left turning vehicles. Recommendations A single lane roundabout is recommended to improve circulation and reduce queueing. This improvement will also reduce conflict points for pedestrians crossing the intersection, and reduce the crossing distance at any one time. See Figure 3. Alternately, curb extensions and/or a traffic signal could be installed at this intersection. See Figure 4 and Figure 5. Appendix C presents analysis of traffic operations at this intersection if a signal were installed. Average delay would be reduced from 31.7 seconds to 26 seconds in the AM peak hour and from 32.9 seconds to 22.7 seconds in the PM peak hour, coinciding with a change in LOS from D to C for both AM and PM. Appendix E presents the signal timing sheet for the signal alternative. Page 327 of 585 0 1 inch = ft. 50'50' 50 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT N DE S P I N A D R I V E LO W G A P R O A D Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 2:39 PM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE 3 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS LO W G A P R O A D 8' MULTI-USE PATH BIKE RAMP (TYP) CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER CENTRAL ISLAND TRUCK APRON 10' MULTI-USE PATH 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH RAISED SLITTER ISLAND (TYP) R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 20' 20' RETAINING WALLSTAIRS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE RETAINING WALL Page 328 of 585 STO P STOP STO P 11 ' 6' 11 ' 3' 6' 11 ' 10 ' 11 ' 3' 6' 3' 11'11'5'8'5'8'BIOSWALE (TYP) LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' SIDEWALK R/WR/W R/W R/W R/W 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' R=20' R=20' VALLEY GUTTER 0 1 inch = ft. 40'40' 40 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS N DE S P I N A D R I V E LO W G A P R O A D Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.24.19 Source: FIGURE 4 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE Page 329 of 585 11 ' 6' 11 ' 3' 6' 11 ' 10 ' 11 ' 3' 6' 3' 11'11'5'8'5'8'BIOSWALE (TYP) LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' SIDEWALK R/WR/W R/W R/W R/W 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' R=20' R=20' VALLEY GUTTER 0 1 inch = ft. 40'40' 40 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS / TRAFFIC SIGNAL N DE S P I N A D R I V E LO W G A P R O A D Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE 5 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE Page 330 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 16 5.Despina Drive at Capps Lane Challenges Yellow transverse crosswalks are marked on all three legs of this intersection. Only the Capps Lane approach is controlled with a stop sign. There is a narrow gap in the school fence on the west side of this intersection which is heavily used by students walking onto the campus. An unpaved path has been worn into the field. Parents dropping off and picking up students also use this school access. Existing on-street parking on Despina Drive provides a place for drivers to pull over while students enter and exit vehicles, but can also create conflicts and visibility challenges for pedestrians crossing Despina Drive. Recommendations Install curb extensions on all corners of the intersection, including a large curb extension spanning both crosswalks on the west side of the intersection. This will improve visibility between drivers and pedestrians, reduce pedestrian exposure by shortening crossing distances, and will discourage passenger loading and unloading in the intersection. See Figure 6. Upgrade the existing marked crosswalks to yellow high visibility crosswalks. This will enhance conspicuity of the intersection for oncoming drivers. Improve the pedestrian gate and unpaved path to meet standards for ADA accessibility and Class I shared use paths. Although bicycling is unlikely to be permitted on this path, these improvements will provide a safer and more accessible path onto campus for pedestrians. Paving the pathway will also support walking to school during winter months when rain may make an unpaved path impassable. 6.Despina Drive at Empire Drive Challenges Yellow transverse crosswalks are marked on the east and south legs of this T-intersection. Only the Empire Drive approach is controlled by a stop sign. A single diagonal curb ramp is provided on each of the northeast and southeast corners, but no curb ramp is provided to access the sidewalk on the west side of Despina Drive. Existing on-street parking on Despina Drive provides a place for drivers to pull over while students enter and exit vehicles, but can also create conflicts and visibility challenges for pedestrians crossing Despina Drive at this location. Recommendations Install curb extensions at each end of the crosswalks on the east and south legs of the intersection. This will improve visibility between drivers and pedestrians and reduce pedestrian exposure by shortening crossing distances. Upgrade the existing marked crosswalks to yellow high visibility crosswalks. This will enhance conspicuity of the intersection for oncoming drivers. Page 331 of 585 STOP ST O P STOP 8'5'11'11'5'8' 22 ' 22 ' 8'5'11'11'5'8' RETAINING CURB & FENCE 5%5%5%5% LANDING (TYP) 30'10' CONCRETE PATH 5' SIDEWALK 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 10 ' 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) DRAINAGE TUBE R=15' R/W R/W R/W 0 1 inch = ft. 40'40' 40 INTERSECTION #5 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS N DE S P I N A D R I V E CAP P S L A N E Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.24.19 Source: FIGURE 6 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE Page 332 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 18 7.Empire Drive Challenges Ukiah has few designated bicycle facilities, but Class II bicycle lanes exist on both Despina Drive and Bush Street. The nearest east-west bicycle facility connecting these streets is Low Gap Road, which may be uncomfortable for some bicyclists due to its higher speeds and traffic volumes. Recommendations Implement a Class III bicycle route on Empire Drive from Despina Drive to State Street. This will provide a bicycle connection on a quiet, low-stress street for students traveling to schools in the area. 8.Low Gap Road Challenges Class II bicycle lanes currently exist on Low Gap Road through the project area, which are relatively narrow and offer little separation between bicyclists and traffic. The posted speed limit on Low Gap Road is 30 mph, with the 85th percentile surveyed at 33 mph. Multiple schools, community buildings, and businesses have driveway access off of Low Gap Road, which creates potential conflicts between bicyclists and drivers turning in or out of driveways. Recommendations Upgrade existing bicycle lanes to Class II buffered bicycle lanes. This will improve comfort for bicyclists by providing additional separation from moving traffic, and may have a traffic calming effect by narrowing the width of vehicle lanes. Highlight bicycle lanes with green markings where they cross driveways. This will increase visibility of the bicycle lane for drivers and reinforce that drivers turning across the bicycle lane must yield the right of way to bicyclists. 9.North Bush Street near Arlington Drive Challenges Yellow transverse crosswalks are marked on all three legs of this intersection. All three approaches are controlled with stop signs. The west side of this intersection is a driveway providing access for school buses to drop off and pick up students. The curb on the west side of Bush Street is marked red and parking is prohibited within the intersection and approximately 50 feet to the north and south. In addition to the school bus driveway located at the Arlington Drive intersection, three other driveways south of Arlington Drive provide access to the school’s parking lots. Each of these creates a potential conflict with pedestrians walking along the sidewalk. Page 333 of 585 GHD | Final Report | 11176246| Page 19 Recommendations Install curb extensions on the west end of both crosswalks on the west side of the intersection. This will improve visibility between drivers and pedestrians, reduce pedestrian exposure by shortening crossing distances, and will discourage passenger loading and unloading in the intersection while preserving bus access to the bus loop driveway. Upgrade the existing marked crosswalks to yellow high visibility crosswalks. This will enhance conspicuity of the intersection for oncoming drivers. Mark yellow high visibility crosswalks across driveways. This will enhance visibility of pedestrians for drivers entering or exiting driveways. 10. Ukiah High School Parking Lots Challenges Four driveways off Despina Drive and Low Gap Road provide access to staff and student parking lots at Ukiah High School. Each of these creates a potential conflict with pedestrians walking along the sidewalk and bicyclists traveling in bicycle lanes. A skate park located south of Low Gap Road has created demand for a crossing from the school, but no crosswalk exists. This contributes to students darting across the roadway. In addition, vehicle circulation within the student and visitor parking lot at the corner of Low Gap Road and Despina Drive is currently challenging at congested school arrival and dismissal times. The high school has a mix of students who drive themselves to school and students who are dropped off by a parent or other adult. Long queues form at the exit driveways, exacerbated by queues on both Low Gap Road and Despina Drive that form at the stop-controlled intersection. Within the parking lot, exiting drivers are currently funneled to routes that conflict with drivers accessing drop-off areas. Large sections of curb are currently marked red and parking is prohibited, contributing to underutilized curb space for drop-off that could facilitate smoother operations. Recommendations •Reconfigure internal parking lot circulation and student drop-off as shown in Figure 7. •Mark yellow high visibility crosswalks across driveways. This will enhance visibility of pedestrians for drivers entering or exiting driveways. •Highlight bicycle lanes with green markings where they cross driveways. This will increase visibility of the bicycle lane for drivers and reinforce that drivers turning across the bicycle lane must yield the right of way to bicyclists. •Mark a yellow high visibility crosswalk and install a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) across Low Gap Road aligned with the pedestrian path on the high school campus and the skate park. This will increase visibility of pedestrians crossing the road and encourage crossings to occur at a single designated location. •This configuration will result in a net loss of 53 parking spaces, which should be within the typical amount of unused spaces in the lot on a daily basis. Page 334 of 585 Page 335 of 585 Final Report | R2506RPT001.docx | Page 21 Todd Tregenza, AICP Todd.Tregenza@ghd.com 916.782.8688 Kamesh Vedula, PE, TE Kamesh.Vedula@ghd.com 916.782.8688 Page 336 of 585 Appendix A: Traffic Operations Analysis Figures Page 337 of 585 5 Paper Size ANSI B 0 1 00 200 300 400 500 fl Coordinale Reference Syslem: EPSG: 4326 • WGS 64 Docm,enl.Pah: K:'iPRM506'..G250S'Uklah Sch:>olsMap.Qi1S PrillOale: Au::i·13-201B (Mli 5 1 City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas SCHOOLS AND TRANSIT STOPS Legend e Study Intersections � Transll Slops School locations Study Area -Study Roadways -Olher Roadways t Schools ProjectNo. 11159240 Revision No. Date. 08/1312018 FIGURE 1 Crea'&dSv;Za::hSlnQer Page 338 of 585 1 6 5 4 3 2 FORD ROADEMPIRE DRIVE DE S P I N A D R I V E CAPP S LANE LOW G A P R O A D BRUSH STREET N S T A T E S T R E E T GARRETT DRIVE ARLINGTON DR N B U S H S T R E E T FORD STREET N B U S H S T R E E T LOVERS L A N E BR I G G S S T R E E T Ukiah VEHICLE LANE BICYCLE LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL Empire Drive/Ford Road N S t a t e S t r e e t Low Gap Road/Brush Street N S t a t e S t r e e t Low Gap Road N B u s h S t r e e t Low Gap Road D e s p i n a D r i v e Empire Drive D e s p i n a D r i v e Capps Lane D e s p i n a D r i v e LEGEND: FIGURE 2 EXISTING LANE GEOMETRICS AND CONTROL N Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\T2506TG001.dwg Plot Date: 31 August 2018 - 12:39 PM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR SCHOOLS & SURROUNDING AREA 11176246 001 07.12.2018 Source: Page 339 of 585 I < Dala Ois.:laimcr " hsert lext as reqLired by data custodian ·• .. Remove only if nol required by dala cuslodlan " ,� Paper Size ANSI B 0 100 200 300 400 500 ft Coordinate Reference Syslem: EPSG: 4326 • WGS 64 Do:arnenl Pa.ti: K'.\f'RJl2506'.G2:506iJ.JkiahSchocts Map.qgs PfrltDale:A113-tJ.201S ca:M §t City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Legend = Scl!ool Crosswalk -Crosswalk -Sidewalk • Study lnteraections -Study Roadways -Olher Roadways Schools Project No. 11159240 Revision No. Date. 08/13/2018 FIGURE 3 OataSc:uJ"C!: Creamd av. Za:h Str'K!er Page 340 of 585 r Dala Dsolaimor " hsert lext as req�red by data custodian " .. Remove only if not roquirod by dala custodian " "" Paper Size ANSI B 0 100 200 300 400 500 ft Coordinale Reference System: EPSG: 4326 - WGS 64 Oo:arnenl !>a.ti: K:'I.PR.Jt2506I.G2506'IJ.Jldah Sdloch Map.qgs PfrltD2ie:A�·1J.201S ca:M h 1 City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES Legend -Bike Lanes e Study lntersedions - Study Roadways -Olhre Roadways Schools Project No. 11159240 Revision No. Date. 08-13-2018 FIGURE 4 DataiSc:urce: Creaed 8y: Zach Stn;ier Page 341 of 585 1 6 5 4 3 2 FORD ROADEMPIRE DRIVE DE S P I N A D R I V E CAPP S LANE LOW G A P R O A D BRUSH STREET N S T A T E S T R E E T GARRETT DRIVE ARLINGTON DR N B U S H S T R E E T FORD STREET N B U S H S T R E E T LOVERS L A N E BR I G G S S T R E E T Ukiah LEGEND: - AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES XX (XX) FIGURE 5 EXISTING SCHOOL YEAR PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES N Empire Drive/Ford Road N S t a t e S t r e e t Low Gap Road/Brush Street N S t a t e S t r e e t Low Gap Road N B u s h S t r e e t Low Gap Road D e s p i n a D r i v e Empire Drive D e s p i n a D r i v e Capps Lane D e s p i n a D r i v e Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\T2506TG001.dwg Plot Date: 31 August 2018 - 1:56 PM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR SCHOOLS & SURROUNDING AREA 11176246 001 07.12.2018 Source: Page 342 of 585 1 6 5 4 3 2 FORD ROADEMPIRE DRIVE DE S P I N A D R I V E CAPP S LANE LOW G A P R O A D BRUSH STREET N S T A T E S T R E E T GARRETT DRIVE ARLINGTON DR N B U S H S T R E E T FORD STREET N B U S H S T R E E T LOVERS L A N E BR I G G S S T R E E T Ukiah LEGEND: - AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES XX (XX) FIGURE 6 EXISTING SUMMER PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES N Empire Drive/Ford Road N S t a t e S t r e e t Low Gap Road/Brush Street N S t a t e S t r e e t Low Gap Road N B u s h S t r e e t Low Gap Road D e s p i n a D r i v e Empire Drive D e s p i n a D r i v e Capps Lane D e s p i n a D r i v e Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\T2506TG001.dwg Plot Date: 31 August 2018 - 2:08 PM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR SCHOOLS & SURROUNDING AREA 11176246 001 07.12.2018 Source: Page 343 of 585 Appendix B: Intersection Turning Movement Counts Page 344 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08208-010 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 144 609 48 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 160 617 63 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 59050 0 78029 000 00101 0 80 278 0 251 0 TEV 1910 0 2397 0 000 46075 0 PHF 0.84 0.91 57040 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 70 726 157 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0 49 452 68 AM S E m p i r e D r 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 222 0 308 N State St 746 0 N State St SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 295 0 PE A K H O U R S Total Vehicles (AM) NONE 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 780 1036 0 0 S E m p i r e D r EA S T B O U N D Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 758 Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM) N State St & S Empire Dr Thursday 05/10/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM Total Vehicles (Noon) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 162 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) NOONAM PM 7 0 0 6 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 1 0 9 0 1 5 1 8 1 1 14 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 80 29 50 57 46 278 14 4 60 9 48 49 45 2 68 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 101 78 59 40 75 251 16 0 61 7 63 70 72 6 15 7 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 6 1 0 6 0 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 345 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08208-012 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 129 553 39 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 102 628 27 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 118 0 42 0 97094 000 0016024 103 0 109 0 TEV 1775 0 2148 0 000 75054 0 PHF 0.81 0.92 132 0 102 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 78 805 12 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0 72 477 35 AM Lo w G a p R d / B r u s h S t 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 295 0 277 N State St 709 0 N State St SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 93 0 PE A K H O U R S Total Vehicles (AM) NONE 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 622 1032 0 0 Lo w G a p R d / B r u s h S t EA S T B O U N D Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 746 Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM) N State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St Thursday 05/10/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Total Vehicles (Noon) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 149 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) NOONAM PM 1 1 1 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 2 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 1 2 2 0 0 1 2 6 3 1 5 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 24 94 42 132 75 103 12 9 55 3 39 72 47 7 35 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 16 97 118 102 54 109 10 2 62 8 27 78 80 5 12 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 6 2 0 5 0 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 346 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08208-016 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 63 152 93 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 31 148 69 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 49046 0 158 0 187 000 0079 0 129 28030 0 TEV 1339 0 1219 0 000 139 0 164 0 PHF 0.87 0.84 119 0 124 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 113 172 82 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0 179 148 56 AM Lo w G a p R d 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 429 0 302 N. Bush St 400 0 N. Bush St SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 315 0 PE A K H O U R S Total Vehicles (AM) NONE 02:45 PM - 03:45 PM 222 251 0 0 Lo w G a p R d EA S T B O U N D Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 351 Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM) N. Bush St & Low Gap Rd Thursday 05/10/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Total Vehicles (Noon) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 288 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) NOONAM PM 5 3 7 14 2 0 0 0 1 0 10 3 0 24 0 0 0 2 6 0 17 5 0 29 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 2 1 3 3 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 129 187 46 119 139 28 63 15 2 93 17 9 14 8 56 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 79 158 49 124 164 30 31 14 8 69 11 3 17 2 82 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 5 3 2 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 347 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08208-017 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 1180790 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 29 0 110 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 109 0 63 0 100 0 307 000 00000 92071 0 TEV 853 0 593 0 000 194 0 174 0 PHF 0.76 0.62 000 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0000PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0000AM Lo w G a p R d 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 425 0 129 Despina Dr 0 0 Despina Dr SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 284 0 PE A K H O U R S Total Vehicles (AM) NONE 03:00 PM - 04:00 PM 155 180 0 0 Lo w G a p R d EA S T B O U N D Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 0 Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM) Despina Dr & Low Gap Rd Thursday 05/10/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Total Vehicles (Noon) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 273 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) NOONAM PM 0 0 0 24 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 37 0 5 11 0 4 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 0 5 1 0 10 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 0 307 63 0 194 92 11 8 0 79 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 0 100 109 0 174 71 29 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 348 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08208-018 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 0 338 22 1 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 062180 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 12 0 8 0 000 000 0063094 000 0 TEV 610 0 357 0 000 000 0 PHF 0.65 0.59 000 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 1 0 86 115 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0 0 53 94 AM Em p i r e D r 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 000 Despina Dr 432 0 Despina Dr SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 133 0 PE A K H O U R S Total Vehicles (AM) NONE 03:00 PM - 04:00 PM 62 98 0 0 Em p i r e D r EA S T B O U N D Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 126 Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM) Despina Dr & Empire Dr Thursday 05/10/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM Total Vehicles (Noon) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 116 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) NOONAM PM 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 0 28 0 6 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 2 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 94 0 8 0 0 0 0 33 8 22 0 53 94 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 63 0 12 0 0 0 0 62 18 0 86 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 349 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08208-019 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 0 392 37 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 0 103 21 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 19028 0 000 000 0025081 000 0 TEV 719 0 447 0 001 000 0 PHF 0.63 0.50 000 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 0 176 103 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 2 0 121 57 AM Ca p p s L n 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 000 Despina Dr 475 0 Despina Dr SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 124 0 PE A K H O U R S Total Vehicles (AM) NONE 03:00 PM - 04:00 PM 149 195 0 0 Ca p p s L n EA S T B O U N D Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 128 Total Vehicles (PM) HT (PM) Despina Dr & Capps Ln Thursday 05/10/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM Total Vehicles (Noon) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 95 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) NOONAM PM 3 2 19 12 1 3 0 2 0 70 0 4 0 0 18 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 81 0 28 0 0 0 0 39 2 37 0 12 1 57 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 25 0 19 0 0 0 0 10 3 21 0 17 6 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 1 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 350 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08350-001 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 100 457 31 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 114 519 42 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 70032 0 46020 000 0096032 189 0 202 0 TEV 1256 0 2009 0 000 19039 0 PHF 0.85 0.92 36038 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 56 662 125 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0 19 281 40 AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 653 Cars (PM)HT (PM) N State St & Empire Dr/Ford Rd Wednesday 07/11/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM Cars (NOON) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 90 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) PE A K H O U R S Cars (AM) NONE 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 502 934 0 0 Em p i r e D r / F o r d R d EA S T B O U N D N State St 525 0 N State St SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 206 0 Em p i r e D r / F o r d R d 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 139 0 216 NOONAM PM 6 0 2 5 5 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 0 2 10 0 0 0 1 10 8 0 11 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 32 18 22 36 19 189 99 44 7 23 19 27 0 38 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 96 45 69 38 39 201 11 2 50 8 41 56 65 7 12 4 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 11 1 0 5 1 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 351 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08350-002 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 81 407 43 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 80 531 79 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 148 0 47 0 59057 000 0022020 58 0 101 0 TEV 1155 0 1887 0 000 58075 0 PHF 0.79 0.85 64070 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 47 660 15 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0 34 268 18 AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 623 Cars (PM)HT (PM) N State St & Low Gap Rd/ Brush St Wednesday 07/11/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Cars (NOON) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 119 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) PE A K H O U R S Cars (AM) NONE 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 373 909 0 0 Lo w G a p R d / B r u s h S t EA S T B O U N D N State St 491 0 N State St SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 169 0 Lo w G a p R d / B r u s h S t 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 172 0 186 NOONAM PM 2 2 1 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 6 2 0 1 0 4 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 4 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 9 0 3 7 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 19 55 45 64 57 58 80 39 8 43 31 26 1 15 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 22 59 145 69 73 100 79 52 7 76 47 65 7 15 0 0 3 1 2 1 1 4 3 0 3 0 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 352 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08350-003 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 39 118 50 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 8 100 47 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 42024 0 81 0 104 000 0071066 7029 0 TEV 705 0 780 0 000 58096 0 PHF 0.68 0.82 51039 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 29 170 68 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0 498455 AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 210 Cars (PM)HT (PM) N Bush St & Low Gap Rd Wednesday 07/11/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Cars (NOON) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 163 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) PE A K H O U R S Cars (AM) NONE 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 115 241 0 0 Lo w G a p R d EA S T B O U N D N Bush St 235 0 N Bush St SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 211 0 Lo w G a p R d 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 192 0 118 NOONAM PM 0 4 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 2 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 0 5 1 9 1 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 66 99 23 42 57 7 37 11 6 50 45 80 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 69 80 42 39 94 29 8 97 46 29 16 8 66 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 2 2 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 353 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08350-004 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 330540 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 90310 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 42018 0 46070 000 00000 705 0 TEV 230 0 165 0 000 48032 0 PHF 0.70 0.94 000 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0000PM NOON 0000NOON AM 0000AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 0 Cars (PM)HT (PM) Despina Dr & Low Gap Rd Wednesday 07/11/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Cars (NOON) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 102 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) PE A K H O U R S Cars (AM) NONE 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 25 47 0 0 Lo w G a p R d EA S T B O U N D Despina Dr 0 0 Despina Dr SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 63 0 Lo w G a p R d 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 103 0 55 NOONAM PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 0 8 3 0 8 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 0 62 15 0 40 7 32 0 52 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 0 46 42 0 32 5 9 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 354 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08350-005 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 0567 0 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 0279 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 603 0 000 000 006027 000 0 TEV 116 0 101 0 000 000 0 PHF 0.74 0.97 000 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 0 0 36 17 PM NOON 0000NOON AM 00149AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 33 Cars (PM)HT (PM) Despina Dr & Empire Dr Wednesday 07/11/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Cars (NOON) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 16 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) PE A K H O U R S Cars (AM) NONE 03:45 PM - 04:45 PM 17 42 0 0 Em p i r e D r EA S T B O U N D Despina Dr 83 0 Despina Dr SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 26 0 Em p i r e D r 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 000 NOONAM PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 26 0 3 0 0 0 0 54 7 0 12 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 27 8 0 35 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 355 of 585 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services ID:18-08350-006 Day: City:Ukiah Date: AM 0806 1 AM NOON 0000 NOON PM 0401 0 PM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM 0000 0 601 0 000 000 001011 000 0 TEV 125 0 103 0 000 000 0 PHF 0.74 0.89 000 0 0000 AM NOON PM PM NOON AM PM 00469PM NOON 0000NOON AM 00233AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 41 Cars (PM)HT (PM) Despina Dr & Capps Ln Wednesday 07/11/2018 CONTROL WE S T B O U N D 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Cars (NOON) Pedestrians (Crosswalks) HT (NOON) 9 CO U N T P E R I O D S HT (AM) PE A K H O U R S Cars (AM) NONE 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 25 52 0 0 Ca p p s L n EA S T B O U N D Despina Dr 91 0 Despina Dr SOUTHBOUND 02:00 PM - 06:00 PM NORTHBOUND 10 0 Ca p p s L n 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NONE 000 NOONAM PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM AM AM NOON PM PM NOON AM AM NOON PM NOON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 77 6 0 20 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 39 1 0 46 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 NO O N PM AM NO O N AM PM NO O N AM PMNO O N PM AM Page 356 of 585 Appendix C: Synchro and SimTraffic Outputs Page 357 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 278 46 57 80 29 50 49 452 68 48 609 144 Future Volume (veh/h) 278 46 57 80 29 50 49 452 68 48 609 144 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 331 55 68 95 35 60 58 538 81 57 725 171 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 245 124 154 122 58 99 78 1026 154 78 943 222 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.04 0.33 0.33 0.04 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 761 940 1781 617 1058 1781 3099 465 1781 2852 673 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 331 0 123 95 0 95 58 308 311 57 452 444 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1701 1781 0 1676 1781 1777 1787 1781 1777 1748 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 3.3 2.7 0.0 2.8 1.6 7.1 7.2 1.6 11.6 11.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 3.3 2.7 0.0 2.8 1.6 7.1 7.2 1.6 11.6 11.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.38 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 0 278 122 0 158 78 588 592 78 588 578 V/C Ratio(X) 1.35 0.00 0.44 0.78 0.00 0.60 0.74 0.52 0.53 0.74 0.77 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 245 0 335 631 0 264 666 1119 1125 701 944 929 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.9 0.0 19.2 23.3 0.0 22.1 24.0 13.7 13.8 24.0 15.3 15.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 181.5 0.0 0.4 4.1 0.0 1.4 5.0 0.3 0.3 5.0 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 15.1 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.1 0.7 2.5 2.5 0.7 4.0 3.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 203.4 0.0 19.6 27.4 0.0 23.5 29.0 14.0 14.0 29.0 16.1 16.1 LnGrp LOS F A B C A C C B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 454 190 677 953 Approach Delay, s/veh 153.6 25.4 15.3 16.9 Approach LOS F C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 21.8 8.5 13.3 7.2 21.8 12.0 9.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 9.2 4.7 5.3 3.6 13.6 9.0 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 44.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 358 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 103 75 132 24 94 42 72 477 35 39 553 129 Future Volume (veh/h) 103 75 132 24 94 42 72 477 35 39 553 129 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 127 93 163 30 116 52 89 589 43 48 683 159 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 168 145 253 59 215 97 116 1223 89 82 987 230 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 609 1067 1781 1222 548 1781 3358 245 1781 2861 665 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 127 0 256 30 0 168 89 311 321 48 424 418 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1675 1781 0 1770 1781 1777 1826 1781 1777 1749 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 0.0 8.2 1.0 0.0 5.1 2.9 8.0 8.1 1.6 12.2 12.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 8.2 1.0 0.0 5.1 2.9 8.0 8.1 1.6 12.2 12.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.38 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 168 0 398 59 0 312 116 647 665 82 613 604 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.64 0.51 0.00 0.54 0.76 0.48 0.48 0.59 0.69 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 599 0 844 449 0 743 449 1343 1380 449 1343 1323 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.3 0.0 20.4 28.3 0.0 22.3 27.4 14.6 14.6 27.8 16.8 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.8 0.0 1.7 6.8 0.0 1.4 9.9 0.6 0.5 6.5 1.4 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 0.0 3.1 0.5 0.0 2.1 1.5 3.0 3.1 0.8 4.7 4.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.1 0.0 22.2 35.1 0.0 23.8 37.3 15.1 15.1 34.3 18.2 18.2 LnGrp LOS C A C D A C D B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 383 198 721 890 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.8 25.5 17.9 19.1 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 26.7 6.5 19.1 8.4 25.5 10.1 15.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 10.1 3.0 10.2 4.9 14.2 6.1 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.3 0.0 1.5 0.1 6.2 0.2 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.4 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 359 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh31.7 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Future Vol, veh/h 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.89 0.89 0.70 0.81 0.72 0.80 0.86 0.78 0.66 0.71 0.51 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 40 156 134 184 231 64 224 172 72 141 214 124 Number of Lanes 1 10110111111 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2 HCM Control Delay 42.4 37 26.9 23.6 HCM LOS E E D C Lane NBLn1NBLn2NBLn3EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2SBLn3 Vol Left, %100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, %0% 100% 0% 0% 54% 0% 80% 0% 100% 0% Vol Right, %0% 0% 100% 0% 46% 0% 20% 0% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 179 148 56 28 258 129 233 93 152 63 LT Vol 179 0 0 28 0 129 0 93 0 0 Through Vol 0 148 0 0 139 0 187 0 152 0 RT Vol 0 0 56 0 119 0 46 0 0 63 Lane Flow Rate 224 172 72 40 290 184 295 141 214 124 Geometry Grp 8888888888 Degree of Util (X) 0.677 0.495 0.192 0.123 0.82 0.542 0.813 0.426 0.617 0.33 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.88810.362 9.62611.025 10.1810.584 9.9310.89310.367 9.631 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 331 348 373 325 357 341 365 331 349 373 Service Time 8.655 8.129 7.392 8.79 7.944 8.348 7.693 8.66 8.134 7.397 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.677 0.494 0.193 0.123 0.812 0.54 0.808 0.426 0.613 0.332 HCM Control Delay 33.8 22.9 14.7 15.3 46.1 25.3 44.3 21.6 28.6 17.1 HCM Lane LOS D C B C E D E C D C HCM 95th-tile Q 4.7 2.6 0.7 0.4 7.2 3.1 7.1 2 3.9 1.4 Page 360 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh16.9 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 92 194 307 63 79 118 Future Vol, veh/h 92 194 307 63 79 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.82 0.81 0.70 0.86 0.62 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 146 237 379 90 92 190 Number of Lanes 0 11010 Approach EB WB SB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left SB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach Right SB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1 HCM Control Delay 16.3 19.2 13.7 HCM LOS C C B Lane EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %32% 0% 40% Vol Thru, %68% 83% 0% Vol Right, %0% 17% 60% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 286 370 197 LT Vol 92 0 79 Through Vol 194 307 0 RT Vol 0 63 118 Lane Flow Rate 383 469 282 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X)0.59 0.688 0.455 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.551 5.284 5.811 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 647 680 618 Service Time 3.604 3.334 3.868 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.592 0.69 0.456 HCM Control Delay 16.3 19.2 13.7 HCM Lane LOS C C B HCM 95th-tile Q 3.9 5.5 2.4 Page 361 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 82 28 121 57 37 392 Future Vol, veh/h 82 28 121 57 37 392 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 72 0220 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 63 63 63 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 130 44 192 90 59 622 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 983 311 0 0 284 0 Stage 1 239 ----- Stage 2 744 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 276 729 - - 1278 - Stage 1 801 ----- Stage 2 470 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 253 610 - - 1272 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 253 ----- Stage 1 741 ----- Stage 2 466 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 33 0 0.7 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 297 1272 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.588 0.046 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 33 8 0 HCM Lane LOS - - D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 3.5 0.1 - Page 362 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions 6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 94 8 53 94 23 338 Future Vol, veh/h 94 8 53 94 23 338 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 30880 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 65 65 65 65 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 145 12 82 145 35 520 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 761 166 0 0 235 0 Stage 1 163 ----- Stage 2 598 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 373 878 - - 1332 - Stage 1 866 ----- Stage 2 549 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 346 857 - - 1308 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 346 ----- Stage 1 818 ----- Stage 2 539 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.3 0 0.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 363 1308 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.432 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 22.3 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 2.1 0.1 - Page 363 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 251 75 40 101 78 59 70 726 157 63 617 160 Future Volume (veh/h) 251 75 40 101 78 59 70 726 157 63 617 160 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 276 82 44 111 86 65 77 798 173 69 678 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 219 190 102 143 121 92 98 1020 221 87 961 249 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1133 608 1781 973 735 1781 2904 630 1781 2786 723 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 276 0 126 111 0 151 77 488 483 69 432 422 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1741 1781 0 1708 1781 1777 1757 1781 1777 1732 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 3.7 3.5 0.0 4.8 2.4 14.0 14.0 2.2 12.0 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 3.7 3.5 0.0 4.8 2.4 14.0 14.0 2.2 12.0 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.42 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 219 0 292 143 0 213 98 624 617 87 613 597 V/C Ratio(X) 1.26 0.00 0.43 0.78 0.00 0.71 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.79 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 219 0 306 564 0 240 596 1001 990 627 844 823 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.9 0.0 21.2 25.6 0.0 23.9 26.5 16.5 16.5 26.7 16.1 16.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 147.4 0.0 0.4 3.4 0.0 6.2 5.1 0.8 0.8 5.9 0.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.8 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 2.2 1.1 5.1 5.0 1.0 4.3 4.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 172.4 0.0 21.6 29.1 0.0 30.1 31.6 17.3 17.3 32.6 16.8 16.9 LnGrp LOS F A C C A C C B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 402 262 1048 923 Approach Delay, s/veh 125.1 29.6 18.4 18.0 Approach LOS F C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.8 25.0 9.6 14.5 8.1 24.6 12.0 12.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 16.0 5.5 5.7 4.4 14.0 9.0 6.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.7 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 364 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 54 102 16 97 118 78 805 12 27 628 102 Future Volume (veh/h) 109 54 102 16 97 118 78 805 12 27 628 102 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 118 59 111 17 105 128 85 875 13 29 683 111 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 156 158 296 37 157 191 112 1297 19 57 1011 164 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 578 1087 1781 762 929 1781 3584 53 1781 3056 496 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 118 0 170 17 0 233 85 434 454 29 397 397 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1665 1781 0 1692 1781 1777 1860 1781 1777 1775 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 5.0 0.6 0.0 7.7 2.8 12.5 12.5 1.0 11.7 11.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 5.0 0.6 0.0 7.7 2.8 12.5 12.5 1.0 11.7 11.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.28 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 156 0 454 37 0 348 112 643 673 57 588 587 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.37 0.46 0.00 0.67 0.76 0.67 0.67 0.51 0.67 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 587 0 823 440 0 697 440 1318 1380 440 1318 1316 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.0 0.0 17.9 29.4 0.0 22.2 28.0 16.3 16.3 28.9 17.5 17.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.3 0.0 0.5 8.9 0.0 2.2 10.1 1.2 1.2 6.9 1.4 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.0 3.1 1.5 4.7 5.0 0.5 4.5 4.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.3 0.0 18.4 38.3 0.0 24.4 38.1 17.6 17.5 35.8 18.8 18.9 LnGrp LOS C A B D A C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 288 250 973 823 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.9 25.4 19.4 19.5 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 27.0 5.7 21.5 8.3 25.1 9.8 17.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 14.5 2.6 7.0 4.8 13.7 5.9 9.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.5 0.0 1.0 0.1 5.7 0.2 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.7 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 365 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh32.9 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Future Vol, veh/h 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.54 0.79 0.76 0.85 0.70 0.86 0.82 0.72 0.83 0.62 0.84 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 56 208 163 93 226 57 138 239 99 111 176 36 Number of Lanes 1 10110111111 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2 HCM Control Delay 56.2 30.4 22.6 20 HCM LOS F D C C Lane NBLn1NBLn2NBLn3EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2SBLn3 Vol Left, %100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, %0% 100% 0% 0% 57% 0% 76% 0% 100% 0% Vol Right, %0% 0% 100% 0% 43% 0% 24% 0% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 113 172 82 30 288 79 207 69 148 31 LT Vol 113 0 0 30 0 79 0 69 0 0 Through Vol 0 172 0 0 164 0 158 0 148 0 RT Vol 0 0 82 0 124 0 49 0 0 31 Lane Flow Rate 138 239 99 56 371 93 283 111 176 36 Geometry Grp 8888888888 Degree of Util (X) 0.388 0.639 0.244 0.154 0.942 0.261 0.742 0.328 0.494 0.094 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.149 9.626 8.892 9.962 9.14310.124 9.44310.615 10.09 9.354 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 354 375 403 362 400 355 384 338 358 383 Service Time 7.912 7.388 6.655 7.662 6.843 7.884 7.202 8.382 7.856 7.12 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.39 0.637 0.246 0.155 0.927 0.262 0.737 0.328 0.492 0.094 HCM Control Delay 19.2 28 14.5 14.5 62.4 16.4 35 18.5 22.4 13.1 HCM Lane LOS C D B B F CDCCB HCM 95th-tile Q 1.8 4.2 0.9 0.5 10.5 1 5.8 1.4 2.6 0.3 Page 366 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Conditions 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh15.4 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 71 174 100 109 110 29 Future Vol, veh/h 71 174 100 109 110 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.64 0.57 0.57 0.40 0.68 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 33333 Mvmt Flow 116 272 175 191 275 43 Number of Lanes 0 11010 Approach EB WB SB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left SB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach Right SB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1 HCM Control Delay 16.6 14.2 15.3 HCM LOS C B C Lane EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %29% 0% 79% Vol Thru, %71% 48% 0% Vol Right, %0% 52% 21% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 245 209 139 LT Vol 71 0 110 Through Vol 174 100 0 RT Vol 0 109 29 Lane Flow Rate 388 367 318 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.599 0.534 0.523 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.554 5.243 5.926 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 648 686 607 Service Time 3.606 3.298 3.98 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.599 0.535 0.524 HCM Control Delay 16.6 14.2 15.3 HCM Lane LOS C B C HCM 95th-tile Q 4 3.2 3 Page 367 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 19 176 103 21 103 Future Vol, veh/h 25 19 176 103 21 103 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 21 124 0 21 21 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 50 38 352 206 42 206 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 787 600 0 0 579 0 Stage 1 476 ----- Stage 2 311 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 360 501 - - 995 - Stage 1 625 ----- Stage 2 743 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 311 346 - - 949 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 311 ----- Stage 1 566 ----- Stage 2 708 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.1 0 1.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 325 949 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.271 0.044 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.1 9 0 HCM Lane LOS - - C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.1 0.1 - Page 368 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions 6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 12 86 115 18 62 Future Vol, veh/h 63 12 86 115 18 62 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 1 0 18 18 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 59 59 59 59 59 59 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 107 20 146 195 31 105 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 434 263 0 0 359 0 Stage 1 262 ----- Stage 2 172 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 579 776 - - 1200 - Stage 1 782 ----- Stage 2 858 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 534 743 - - 1152 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 534 ----- Stage 1 729 ----- Stage 2 849 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.3 0 1.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 559 1152 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.227 0.026 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.3 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.9 0.1 - Page 369 of 585 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions 08/28/2019 SimTraffic ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Page 2 Intersection: 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L TR L TR L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 145 421 176 310 124 246 108 142 285 151 Average Queue (ft) 37 138 54 75 56 61 29 40 75 28 95th Queue (ft)123 342 139 217 115 176 69 112 218 105 Link Distance (ft)875 631 614 793 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 110 75 75 105 80 Storage Blk Time (%)25 4 8 15 2 0 0 10 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)8 12 13 33 5 0 1 25 5 Intersection: 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT TR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 176 290 131 Average Queue (ft) 71 95 56 95th Queue (ft)132 227 98 Link Distance (ft)931 982 1378 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 160 79 256 Average Queue (ft) 53 15 66 95th Queue (ft)119 53 182 Link Distance (ft)211 1378 384 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 102 Page 370 of 585 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions 08/28/2019 SimTraffic ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Page 2 Intersection: 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L TR L TR L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 175 761 153 300 113 176 110 92 182 98 Average Queue (ft) 55 361 40 94 37 62 41 28 68 6 95th Queue (ft)173 947 120 270 90 137 89 68 135 44 Link Distance (ft)1087 608 572 852 Upstream Blk Time (%)11 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 110 75 75 105 80 Storage Blk Time (%)0 52 0 14 3811100 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 18 0 12 7 17 2 1 11 0 Intersection: 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT TR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 316 333 270 Average Queue (ft) 97 89 71 95th Queue (ft)243 238 208 Link Distance (ft)731 906 1378 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 118 204 155 Average Queue (ft) 33 52 35 95th Queue (ft)86 139 109 Link Distance (ft)211 1378 384 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 67 Page 371 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 189 19 36 32 20 32 19 281 40 31 457 100 Future Volume (veh/h) 189 19 36 32 20 32 19 281 40 31 457 100 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 222 22 42 38 24 38 22 331 47 36 538 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, %444444444444 Cap, veh/h 275 115 220 60 52 82 38 809 114 57 781 171 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 566 1080 1753 640 1014 1753 3078 433 1753 2853 623 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 222 0 64 38 0 62 22 187 191 36 329 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 0 1646 1753 0 1654 1753 1749 1763 1753 1749 1727 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.5 3.8 3.8 0.9 7.2 7.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.5 3.8 3.8 0.9 7.2 7.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 275 0 335 60 0 134 38 459 463 57 479 473 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.19 0.64 0.00 0.46 0.58 0.41 0.41 0.63 0.69 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 0 384 737 0 309 778 1307 1317 819 1103 1089 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.4 0.0 14.1 20.4 0.0 18.8 20.8 13.0 13.1 20.5 13.9 13.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.8 0.0 0.1 4.2 0.0 0.9 5.2 0.2 0.2 4.2 0.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.2 1.3 1.3 0.4 2.3 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.2 0.0 14.2 24.6 0.0 19.7 26.0 13.2 13.3 24.7 14.6 14.6 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 286 100 400 692 Approach Delay, s/veh 27.4 21.6 14.0 15.1 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 16.2 6.5 13.7 5.9 16.7 11.7 8.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 5.8 2.9 3.4 2.5 9.3 7.2 3.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.6 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 372 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 58 64 20 57 47 34 268 18 43 407 81 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 58 64 20 57 47 34 268 18 43 407 81 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 73 81 25 72 59 43 339 23 54 515 103 Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, %333333333333 Cap, veh/h 114 198 220 52 199 163 80 933 63 94 839 167 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 802 890 1767 942 772 1767 3351 226 1767 2929 583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 0 154 25 0 131 43 178 184 54 309 309 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1693 1767 0 1714 1767 1763 1814 1767 1763 1749 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 0.0 3.7 0.7 0.0 3.2 1.2 3.9 4.0 1.4 7.4 7.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 3.7 0.7 0.0 3.2 1.2 3.9 4.0 1.4 7.4 7.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.33 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 114 0 418 52 0 363 80 491 505 94 505 501 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.37 0.48 0.00 0.36 0.54 0.36 0.37 0.57 0.61 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 729 0 1048 547 0 884 547 1637 1685 547 1637 1625 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 0.0 15.1 23.1 0.0 16.3 22.6 14.0 14.0 22.4 15.0 15.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.8 0.0 0.5 6.7 0.0 0.6 5.5 0.4 0.4 5.4 1.2 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.6 1.4 1.5 0.7 2.7 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.0 0.0 15.7 29.8 0.0 16.9 28.1 14.5 14.5 27.8 16.2 16.2 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 227 156 405 672 Approach Delay, s/veh 19.6 19.0 15.9 17.1 Approach LOS BBBB Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 18.5 5.9 17.0 6.7 18.9 7.6 15.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 6.0 2.7 5.7 3.2 9.4 4.0 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 4.3 0.1 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.4 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 373 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.4 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 58 51 66 104 24 49 84 55 50 118 39 Future Vol, veh/h 7 58 51 66 104 24 49 84 55 50 118 39 Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 44444444444 Mvmt Flow 10 85 75 97 153 35 72 124 81 74 174 57 Number of Lanes 1 10110111111 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2 HCM Control Delay 12.8 13 11.5 12.3 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1NBLn2NBLn3EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2SBLn3 Vol Left, %100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, %0% 100% 0% 0% 53% 0% 81% 0% 100% 0% Vol Right, %0% 0% 100% 0% 47% 0% 19% 0% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 49 84 55 7 109 66 128 50 118 39 LT Vol 4900706605000 Through Vol 0 84 0 0 58 0 104 0 118 0 RT Vol 0 0 55 0 51 0 24 0 0 39 Lane Flow Rate 72 124 81 10 160 97 188 74 174 57 Geometry Grp 8888888888 Degree of Util (X) 0.153 0.245 0.144 0.022 0.311 0.203 0.361 0.154 0.34 0.101 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.637 7.127 6.413 7.81 6.976 7.53 6.896 7.559 7.05 6.336 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 470 504 559 459 516 479 525 475 510 565 Service Time 5.378 4.868 4.154 5.551 4.718 5.23 4.596 5.299 4.789 4.075 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.153 0.246 0.145 0.022 0.31 0.203 0.358 0.156 0.341 0.101 HCM Control Delay 11.8 12.2 10.2 10.7 12.9 12.1 13.4 11.7 13.4 9.8 HCM Lane LOS BBBBBBBBBA HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1 0.5 0.1 1.3 0.8 1.6 0.5 1.5 0.3 Page 374 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.1 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 48 70 18 54 33 Future Vol, veh/h 7 48 70 18 54 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 10 10 10 10 10 Mvmt Flow 10 69 100 26 77 47 Number of Lanes 0 11010 Approach EB WB SB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left SB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach Right SB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8 8.1 8.2 HCM LOS A A A Lane EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %13% 0% 62% Vol Thru, %87% 80% 0% Vol Right, %0% 20% 38% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 55 88 87 LT Vol 7 0 54 Through Vol 48 70 0 RT Vol 0 18 33 Lane Flow Rate 79 126 124 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.099 0.151 0.153 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.523 4.327 4.434 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 795 832 812 Service Time 2.534 2.338 2.445 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.151 0.153 HCM Control Delay 8 8.1 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.5 0.5 Page 375 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 1 23 3 7 80 Future Vol, veh/h 11 1 23 3 7 80 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 72 0220 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 74 74 74 74 74 74 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 55555 Mvmt Flow 15 1 31 4 9 108 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 165 107 0 0 37 0 Stage 1 35 ----- Stage 2 130 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 - - 4.15 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 - - 2.245 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 819 939 - - 1554 - Stage 1 980 ----- Stage 2 889 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 809 873 - - 1551 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 809 ----- Stage 1 972 ----- Stage 2 885 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.6 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 814 1551 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.02 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 - Page 376 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions 6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 3 14 9 7 56 Future Vol, veh/h 27 3 14 9 7 56 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 30880 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 74 74 74 74 74 74 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 55555 Mvmt Flow 36 4 19 12 9 76 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 135 36 0 0 39 0 Stage 1 33 ----- Stage 2 102 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 - - 4.15 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 - - 2.245 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 852 1028 - - 1552 - Stage 1 982 ----- Stage 2 915 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 833 1017 - - 1540 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 833 ----- Stage 1 968 ----- Stage 2 908 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 848 1540 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.048 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 - Page 377 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 1: N State St & S Empire Rd/Ford Rd PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 202 39 38 96 46 70 56 662 125 42 519 114 Future Volume (veh/h) 202 39 38 96 46 70 56 662 125 42 519 114 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 220 42 41 104 50 76 61 720 136 46 564 124 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 239 153 150 134 78 119 80 969 183 66 917 201 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 857 837 1781 654 994 1781 2983 563 1781 2891 633 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 220 0 83 104 0 126 61 429 427 46 346 342 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1694 1781 0 1649 1781 1777 1769 1781 1777 1748 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 0.0 2.2 3.0 0.0 3.8 1.8 11.2 11.2 1.3 8.6 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 0.0 2.2 3.0 0.0 3.8 1.8 11.2 11.2 1.3 8.6 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 239 0 303 134 0 197 80 577 575 66 564 555 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.27 0.78 0.00 0.64 0.76 0.74 0.74 0.69 0.61 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 239 0 325 616 0 253 650 1092 1087 684 921 906 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.3 0.0 18.5 23.7 0.0 21.9 24.6 15.6 15.6 24.8 15.1 15.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 36.3 0.0 0.2 3.7 0.0 1.3 5.4 0.7 0.7 4.7 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.0 1.4 0.8 4.0 4.0 0.6 3.0 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.6 0.0 18.6 27.3 0.0 23.2 30.0 16.4 16.4 29.5 15.5 15.5 LnGrp LOS E A B C A C C B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 303 230 917 734 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.6 25.0 17.3 16.4 Approach LOS D C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.9 21.9 8.9 14.3 7.3 21.5 12.0 11.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 19.0 27.0 7.0 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.2 5.0 4.2 3.8 10.7 8.4 5.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 378 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Without School Conditions 2: State St & Low Gap Rd/Brush St PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 101 75 70 22 59 148 47 660 15 79 531 80 Future Volume (veh/h) 101 75 70 22 59 148 47 660 15 79 531 80 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 119 88 82 26 69 174 55 776 18 93 625 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 157 242 225 52 100 251 88 1147 27 122 1059 159 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 887 827 1781 467 1178 1781 3549 82 1781 3094 464 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 119 0 170 26 0 243 55 388 406 93 358 361 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1714 1781 0 1645 1781 1777 1854 1781 1777 1781 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 0.0 5.0 0.9 0.0 8.4 1.9 11.7 11.7 3.2 10.3 10.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 0.0 5.0 0.9 0.0 8.4 1.9 11.7 11.7 3.2 10.3 10.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.26 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 157 0 467 52 0 351 88 574 600 122 608 610 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.36 0.50 0.00 0.69 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.76 0.59 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 575 0 830 431 0 664 431 1291 1347 431 1291 1294 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.6 0.0 18.2 29.6 0.0 22.5 28.9 18.2 18.2 28.4 16.8 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.3 0.0 0.5 7.3 0.0 2.4 7.1 1.4 1.3 9.5 0.9 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.0 3.3 0.9 4.6 4.8 1.6 3.9 4.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.9 0.0 18.7 36.9 0.0 24.9 36.0 19.6 19.5 37.8 17.7 17.7 LnGrp LOS C A B D A C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 289 269 849 812 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.3 26.1 20.6 20.0 Approach LOS CCCC Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 25.0 6.3 21.9 7.6 26.2 10.0 18.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 45.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 13.7 2.9 7.0 3.9 12.3 6.0 10.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 5.6 0.0 0.9 0.1 5.1 0.2 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.7 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Page 379 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh11.8 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 96 39 71 81 42 29 170 68 47 100 8 Future Vol, veh/h 29 96 39 71 81 42 29 170 68 47 100 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 35 117 48 87 99 51 35 207 83 57 122 10 Number of Lanes 1 10110111111 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 2 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 2 HCM Control Delay 11.9 11.6 12.1 11.5 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1NBLn2NBLn3EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2SBLn3 Vol Left, %100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, %0% 100% 0% 0% 71% 0% 66% 0% 100% 0% Vol Right, %0% 0% 100% 0% 29% 0% 34% 0% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 29 170 68 29 135 71 123 47 100 8 LT Vol 29 0 0 29 0 71 0 47 0 0 Through Vol 0 170 0 0 96 0 81 0 100 0 RT Vol 0 0 68 0 39 0 42 0 0 8 Lane Flow Rate 35 207 83 35 165 87 150 57 122 10 Geometry Grp 8888888888 Degree of Util (X) 0.07 0.38 0.135 0.072 0.301 0.173 0.269 0.118 0.233 0.017 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.102 6.594 5.882 7.294 6.589 7.205 6.463 7.396 6.887 6.175 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 502 543 605 489 542 495 552 482 518 575 Service Time 4.88 4.371 3.66 5.076 4.371 4.987 4.245 5.184 4.674 3.961 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 0.381 0.137 0.072 0.304 0.176 0.272 0.118 0.236 0.017 HCM Control Delay 10.4 13.4 9.6 10.6 12.2 11.5 11.6 11.2 11.8 9.1 HCM Lane LOS BBABBBBBBA HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 1.8 0.5 0.2 1.3 0.6 1.1 0.4 0.9 0.1 Page 380 of 585 HCM 6th AWSC Existing Without School Conditions 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.3 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 32 46 42 31 9 Future Vol, veh/h 5 32 46 42 31 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 5 34 49 45 33 10 Number of Lanes 0 11010 Approach EB WB SB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left SB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach Right SB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 0 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.2 7.4 HCM LOS A A A Lane EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %14% 0% 78% Vol Thru, %86% 52% 0% Vol Right, %0% 48% 23% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 37 88 40 LT Vol 5 0 31 Through Vol 32 46 0 RT Vol 0 42 9 Lane Flow Rate 39 94 43 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.045 0.098 0.049 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.106 3.752 4.183 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 870 953 851 Service Time 2.141 1.782 2.23 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 0.099 0.051 HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.2 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.3 0.2 Page 381 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions 5: Despina Dr & Capps Ln PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 6 46 9 1 40 Future Vol, veh/h 1 6 46 9 1 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 21 124 0 21 21 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 1 7 52 10 1 45 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 146 202 0 0 83 0 Stage 1 78 ----- Stage 2 68 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 846 839 - - 1514 - Stage 1 945 ----- Stage 2 955 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 811 725 - - 1484 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 811 ----- Stage 1 925 ----- Stage 2 936 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.9 0 0.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 736 1484 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.011 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.9 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - Page 382 of 585 HCM 6th TWSC Existing Without School Conditions 6: Despina Dr & S Empire Dr PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 6 36 17 9 27 Future Vol, veh/h 6 6 36 17 9 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 1 0 18 18 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 6 6 37 18 9 28 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 115 65 0 0 73 0 Stage 1 64 ----- Stage 2 51 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 881 999 - - 1527 - Stage 1 959 ----- Stage 2 971 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 981 - - 1501 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 856 ----- Stage 1 937 ----- Stage 2 966 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9 0 1.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- - 914 1501 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.014 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - Page 383 of 585 Proposed Improvements Page 384 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signals/New Geometry 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 139 119 129 187 46 179 148 56 93 152 63 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 156 134 184 231 64 224 172 72 141 214 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.89 0.89 0.70 0.81 0.72 0.80 0.86 0.78 0.66 0.71 0.51 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 72 205 177 231 440 122 276 464 366 182 366 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.20 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 915 786 1781 1402 388 1781 1870 1473 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 0 290 184 0 295 224 172 72 141 214 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1701 1781 0 1791 1781 1870 1473 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 9.7 6.1 0.0 8.2 7.4 4.6 2.4 4.7 6.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 0.0 9.7 6.1 0.0 8.2 7.4 4.6 2.4 4.7 6.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 72 0 382 231 0 562 276 464 366 182 366 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.00 0.76 0.80 0.00 0.52 0.81 0.37 0.20 0.77 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 0 502 345 0 696 403 592 466 377 564 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh28.7 0.0 22.1 25.7 0.0 17.2 24.9 19.0 18.1 26.7 22.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 0.0 4.8 7.6 0.0 0.8 7.8 0.5 0.3 6.8 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 0.0 4.1 2.9 0.0 3.2 3.5 1.9 0.8 2.2 2.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.3 0.0 26.9 33.3 0.0 17.9 32.7 19.5 18.4 33.5 23.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C C A B C B B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 330 479 468 355 A Approach Delay, s/veh 27.9 23.8 25.6 27.6 Approach LOS CCCC Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.7 19.6 12.4 18.2 13.9 16.4 7.0 23.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s12.9 19.3 11.8 18.0 13.8 18.4 6.1 23.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.7 6.6 8.1 11.7 9.4 8.3 3.3 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Page 385 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signals/New Geometry 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 92 194 307 63 79 118 Future Volume (veh/h) 92 194 307 63 79 118 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 146 237 379 90 92 190 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.82 0.81 0.70 0.86 0.62 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22200 Cap, veh/h 226 1057 494 117 125 258 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.57 0.34 0.34 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1449 344 522 1078 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 146 237 0 469 283 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1870 0 1793 1606 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 2.9 0.0 10.7 7.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 2.9 0.0 10.7 7.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 0.33 0.67 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 226 1057 0 611 384 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.22 0.00 0.77 0.74 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 2037 0 1072 730 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh19.1 5.0 0.0 13.5 16.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 0.1 0.0 2.1 2.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.5 0.7 0.0 3.9 2.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.2 5.1 0.0 15.6 18.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C AABBA Approach Vol, veh/h 383 469 283 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.6 15.6 18.9 Approach LOS B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.5 15.5 10.3 20.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 50.1 20.9 18.1 27.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 9.5 5.6 12.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.7 0.3 2.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.1 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Page 386 of 585 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Intersection 3 AM Ex School] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Lane Use and Performance Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueCap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Average Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block.Total HV Veh Dist veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % % South: N Bush Street Lane 1d 468 2.0 948 0.493 100 9.9 LOS A 3.4 86.5 Full 235 0.0 0.0 Approach 468 2.0 0.493 9.9 LOS A 3.4 86.5 East: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 479 2.0 859 0.558 100 12.1 LOS B 4.8 120.9 Full 260 0.0 0.0 Approach 479 2.0 0.558 12.1 LOS B 4.8 120.9 North: N Bush Street Lane 1d 355 2.0 768 0.462 100 11.0 LOS B 2.7 69.4 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 124 2.0 768 0.161 100 6.4 LOS A 0.6 15.7 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Approach 479 2.0 0.462 9.8 LOS A 2.7 69.4 West: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 330 2.0 768 0.430 100 10.3 LOS B 2.5 63.3 Full 170 0.0 0.0 Approach 330 2.0 0.430 10.3 LOS B 2.5 63.3 Intersection 1755 2.0 0.558 10.6 LOS B 4.8 120.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 1:23:09 PM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8 Page 387 of 585 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Intersection 4 AM Ex School] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Lane Use and Performance Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueCap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Average Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block.Total HV Veh Dist veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % % East: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 469 2.0 1161 0.404 100 7.2 LOS A 2.5 62.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 469 2.0 0.404 7.2 LOS A 2.5 62.5 North: Despina Drive Lane 1d 282 2.0 910 0.310 100 7.3 LOS A 1.5 38.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 282 2.0 0.310 7.3 LOS A 1.5 38.3 West: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 383 2.0 1227 0.312 100 5.8 LOS A 1.7 44.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 383 2.0 0.312 5.8 LOS A 1.7 44.4 Intersection 1134 2.0 0.404 6.8 LOS A 2.5 62.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 10:32:21 AM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8 Page 388 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signal/New Geometry 3: Bush St & Low Gap Rd PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 164 124 79 158 49 113 172 82 69 148 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 208 163 93 226 57 138 239 99 111 176 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.54 0.79 0.76 0.85 0.70 0.86 0.82 0.72 0.83 0.62 0.84 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 93 271 212 122 435 110 179 445 342 144 408 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 938 735 1781 1425 359 1781 1870 1437 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 0 371 93 0 283 138 239 99 111 176 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1672 1781 0 1784 1781 1870 1437 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 11.3 2.8 0.0 7.3 4.2 6.2 3.1 3.4 4.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 11.3 2.8 0.0 7.3 4.2 6.2 3.1 3.4 4.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 93 0 483 122 0 544 179 445 342 144 408 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.00 0.77 0.76 0.00 0.52 0.77 0.54 0.29 0.77 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 218 0 678 241 0 746 337 758 582 305 725 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh25.7 0.0 18.1 25.4 0.0 15.9 24.4 18.5 17.3 25.0 18.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.2 0.0 3.5 9.3 0.0 0.8 6.9 1.0 0.5 8.4 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 0.0 4.3 1.4 0.0 2.8 2.0 2.6 1.0 1.7 1.9 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.9 0.0 21.5 34.7 0.0 16.7 31.3 19.5 17.8 33.4 19.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A C C A B C B B C B Approach Vol, veh/h 427 376 476 287 A Approach Delay, s/veh 22.9 21.2 22.6 24.8 Approach LOS CCCC Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.0 17.7 8.3 20.5 10.1 16.6 7.4 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s9.5 22.5 7.5 22.5 10.5 21.5 6.8 23.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.4 8.2 4.8 13.3 6.2 6.5 3.7 9.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.5 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.7 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Page 389 of 585 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions Signal/New Geometry 4: Low Gap Rd & Despina Dr PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 ReportUkiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Area GHD Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 174 100 109 110 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 174 100 109 110 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 272 175 191 275 43 Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.64 0.57 0.57 0.40 0.68 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33300 Cap, veh/h 196 982 249 271 400 63 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.53 0.32 0.32 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1856 782 853 1481 232 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 272 0 366 319 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1856 0 1635 1717 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 3.6 0.0 8.8 7.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 3.6 0.0 8.8 7.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.52 0.86 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 196 982 0 520 464 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.28 0.00 0.70 0.69 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 713 1906 0 856 953 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh19.0 5.8 0.0 13.4 14.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.2 0.0 1.8 1.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 1.0 0.0 2.9 2.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.8 6.0 0.0 15.2 16.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C AABBA Approach Vol, veh/h 388 366 319 Approach Delay, s/veh 10.7 15.2 16.5 Approach LOS B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.3 16.6 9.5 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 46.1 24.9 18.1 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 9.5 4.8 10.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7 0.9 0.2 1.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.0 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Page 390 of 585 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Intersection 3 PM Ex School] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Lane Use and Performance Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueCap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Average Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block.Total HV Veh Dist veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % % South: N Bush Street Lane 1d 475 2.0 911 0.522 100 10.8 LOS B 4.1 103.2 Full 235 0.0 0.0 Approach 475 2.0 0.522 10.8 LOS B 4.1 103.2 East: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 376 2.0 861 0.436 100 9.6 LOS A 2.6 65.9 Full 260 0.0 0.0 Approach 376 2.0 0.436 9.6 LOS A 2.6 65.9 North: N Bush Street Lane 1d 287 2.0 889 0.323 100 7.6 LOS A 1.4 36.0 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 36 2.0 889 0.041 100 4.4 LOS A 0.1 3.7 Full 125 0.0 0.0 Approach 324 2.0 0.323 7.2 LOS A 1.4 36.0 West: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 426 2.0 900 0.474 100 9.9 LOS A 3.1 78.7 Full 170 0.0 0.0 Approach 426 2.0 0.474 9.9 LOS A 3.1 78.7 Intersection 1601 2.0 0.522 9.6 LOS A 4.1 103.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 1:19:35 PM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8 Page 391 of 585 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Intersection 4 PM Ex School] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Lane Use and Performance Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueCap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Average Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block.Total HV Veh Dist veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % % East: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 367 3.0 1184 0.310 100 5.9 LOS A 1.7 43.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 367 3.0 0.310 5.9 LOS A 1.7 43.2 North: Despina Drive Lane 1d 318 3.0 1108 0.287 100 6.0 LOS A 1.5 37.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 318 3.0 0.287 6.0 LOS A 1.5 37.6 West: Low Gap Road Lane 1d 388 3.0 997 0.389 100 7.8 LOS A 2.1 53.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 388 3.0 0.389 7.8 LOS A 2.1 53.8 Intersection 1073 3.0 0.389 6.6 LOS A 2.1 53.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2018 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD SERVICES PTY LTD | Processed: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 10:31:51 AM Project: K:\PRJ\2506\T2506\Sidra\Improvements.sip8 Page 392 of 585 Appendix D: Design Recommendations Page 393 of 585 0 1 inch = ft. 100'100' 100 LOW GAP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUTS D E S P I N A D R I V E LOW GAP ROAD Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 3:01 PM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE D1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E N RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON LOW GAP ROAD N . B U S H S T R E E T 6' BIKE LANE 3' STRIPED BUFFER 6' BIKE LANE 3' STRIPED BUFFER N . P I N E S T R E E T CURB RAMP (TYP) RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON Page 394 of 585 0 1 inch = ft. 50'50' 50 INTERSECTION #3 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT N N O R T H B U S H S T R E E T NO R T H P I N E S T R E E T Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 11:13 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.12.19 Source: FIGURE D2 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE LO W G A P R O A D 10' MULTI-USE PATH BIKE RAMP (TYP) CURB RAMP (TYP) 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER CENTRAL ISLAND TRUCK APRON 10' MULTI-USE PATH 10' MULTI-USE PATH 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH RAISED SLITTER ISLAND (TYP) R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 20' 20' Page 395 of 585 0 1 inch = ft. 50'50' 50 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT N DE S P I N A D R I V E LO W G A P R O A D Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX001.dwg Plot Date: 20 December 2019 - 2:39 PM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE D3 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS LO W G A P R O A D 8' MULTI-USE PATH BIKE RAMP (TYP) CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER CENTRAL ISLAND TRUCK APRON 10' MULTI-USE PATH 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' MULTI-USE PATH RAISED SLITTER ISLAND (TYP) R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 20' 20' RETAINING WALLSTAIRS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE RETAINING WALL Page 396 of 585 STO P STOP STO P 11 ' 6' 11 ' 3' 6' 11 ' 10 ' 11 ' 3' 6' 3' 11'11'5'8'5'8'BIOSWALE (TYP) LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' SIDEWALK R/WR/W R/W R/W R/W 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' R=20' R=20' VALLEY GUTTER 0 1 inch = ft. 40'40' 40 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS N DE S P I N A D R I V E LO W G A P R O A D Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.24.19 Source: FIGURE D4 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE Page 397 of 585 11 ' 6' 11 ' 3' 6' 11 ' 10 ' 11 ' 3' 6' 3' 11'11'5'8'5'8'BIOSWALE (TYP) LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' SIDEWALK R/WR/W R/W R/W R/W 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK CURB RAMP (TYP) 3' R=20' R=20' VALLEY GUTTER 0 1 inch = ft. 40'40' 40 INTERSECTION #4 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS / TRAFFIC SIGNAL N DE S P I N A D R I V E LO W G A P R O A D Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.19.19 Source: FIGURE D5 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE Page 398 of 585 STOP ST O P STOP 8'5'11'11'5'8' 22 ' 22 ' 8'5'11'11'5'8' RETAINING CURB & FENCE 5%5%5%5% LANDING (TYP) 30'10' CONCRETE PATH 5' SIDEWALK 8' WIDE CURB RAMP (TYP) 10 ' 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER (TYP) DRAINAGE TUBE R=15' R/W R/W R/W 0 1 inch = ft. 40'40' 40 INTERSECTION #5 IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT CURB EXTENSIONS N DE S P I N A D R I V E CAP P S L A N E Filename: K:\PRJ\2506\2506EX002.dwg Plot Date: 24 December 2019 - 11:01 AM Date Report No. Project No.City of Ukiah Ukiah Traffic Analysis for Schools and Surrounding Areas 11176246 12.24.19 Source: FIGURE D6 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS NOTES: 1. RIGHT OF WAY (R/W) LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. BASED ON MENDOCINO COUNTY GIS DATA BASE Page 399 of 585 Appendix E: Signal Timing Page 400 of 585 INTERSECTION: Page 1 (of 5) Group Assignment: N/S Street Name:State Street Last Database Change: Field Master Assignment: E/W Street Name:Despina Drive/Low Gap Road System Reference Number: Notes:Phase 7 is a ped only phase for the N-S Peds Change By Date By Date Drop Number <C+0+0> Zone Number <C+0+1> Area Number <C+0+2> Max Initial <F+0+E> Area Address <C+0+3> <C+A+1> Red Revert <F+0+F> QuicNet Channel (QuicNet) <C+B+1> All Red Start <F+C+0> Communication Addresses Manual Selection Start / Revert Times Column Numbers ----> 12345678 E Row Phase Names ----> EB SB Ped WB Row 0 Ped Walk 77 RR-1 Delay Permit 0 1 Ped FDW 17 21 RR-1 Clear Red Lock 1 2 Min Green 868EV-A Delay Yellow Lock 2 3 Type 3 Limit EV-A Clear Min Recall 3 4 Added Initial EV-B Delay Ped Recall 4 5 Veh Extension 2.5 2.0 2.5 EV-B Clear View Set Peds 5 6 Max Gap 3.0 2.5 3.0 EV-C Delay Rest In Walk 6 7 Min Gap 2.5 2.0 2.5 EV-C Clear Red Rest 7 8 Max Limit 30.0 30.0 35.0 EV-D Delay Dual Entry 8 9 Max Limit 2 EV-D Clear Max Recall 9 A RR-2 Delay Soft Recall A B Call To Phase RR-2 Clear Max 2 B C Reduce By 0.0 0.0 0.0 View EV Delay - - -Cond. Service C D Reduce Every 0.0 0.0 0.0 View EV Clear - - -Man Cntrl Calls D E Yellow Change 3.6 3.6 3.6 View RR Delay - - -Yellow Start E F Red Clear 1.0 1.0 1.0 View RR Clear - - -First Phases F Phase Timing - Bank 1 <F Page> Preempt Timing Phase Functions <F Page> Manual Offset 0 = Automatic 1 = Offset A 2 = Offset B 3 = Offset C Change - - - - - Manual Plan 0 = Automatic 1-9 = Plan 1-9 14 = Free 15 = Flash Change Record F Phase Manual Plan 6 Manual Offset Printed on 12/16/2019 3:02 PM Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Revision: 10313 - Stand Alone Page 401 of 585 FHWA-SA-10-007 Technical Summary Mini-Roundabouts ATTACHMENT 2 Page 402 of 585 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Disclaimer and Quality Assurance Statement Foreword This technical summary is designed as a reference for State and local transportation officials, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Division Safety Engineers, and other professionals who may be involved in the design, selection, and implementation of mini-roundabout intersections. Because experience with mini-roundabouts is limited in the United States, the information presented here draws primarily upon guidance and experience from other countries with reference to American guidance as appropriate. This technical summary explores the unique characteristics of mini-roundabouts while reinforcing the need to apply the principles-based approach common to all roundabout design. It provides readers with an overview of the key considerations for planning, analysis, and design of single-lane mini-roundabouts. Section 1 of this document summarizes the characteristics of mini-roundabouts. Section 2 presents benefits of mini-roundabout intersections compared to alternative intersection solutions. Sections 3-6 provide an overview of user, location, operational and design considerations respectively. The information presented herein is a summary of principles outlined in the FHWA document Roundabouts: An Informational Guide [1] and the forthcoming 2nd Edition [2] (hereafter referred to as the Roundabout Guide), which is in progress at the time of this writing and due to be published in 2010. Specific considerations for single-lane and multilane roundabouts are summarized in a separate FHWA document titled Roundabout Technical Summary [3]. Figures are from the Roundabout Guide unless otherwise noted. This publication does not supersede any publication; and is a Final version. Page 403 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts iii Contents Introduction 1 Section 1: Characteristics of Mini-Roundabouts 3 Section 2: Benefits of Mini-Roundabouts 4 Section 3: User Considerations 4 3.1 Motorists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 3.2 Pedestrians . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 3.3 Bicycles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 3.4 Emergency Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Section 4: Location Considerations 5 4.1 Common Site Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 4.2 Site Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Section 5: Operational Analysis 6 Section 6: Design Considerations 7 6.1 Horizontal Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 6.2 Pedestrian Design Treatments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6.3 Bicycle Design Treatments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6.4 Sight Distance and Visibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6.5 Vertical Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Page 404 of 585 iv FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 6.6 Pavement Markings and Signs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6.7 Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.8 Landscaping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.9 Other Design Details and Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Section 7: Costs 13 Section 8: References 14 Page 405 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 1 Introduction Mini-roundabouts are a type of roundabout characterized by a small diameter and traversable islands (central island and splitter islands). Mini-roundabouts offer most of the benefits of regular roundabouts with the added benefit of a smaller footprint. As with roundabouts, mini-roundabouts are a type of intersection rather than merely a traffic calming measure, although they may produce some traffic calming effects. They are best suited to environments where speeds are already low and environmental constraints would preclude the use of a larger roundabout with a raised central island. Mini-roundabouts are common in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and France and are emerging in the United States (including states such as Maryland and Michigan), Germany, and other countries. This technical summary focuses on single-lane mini-roundabouts. Because experience with mini- roundabouts is limited in the United States, the information presented here draws primarily upon guidance and experience from other countries with reference to American guidance as appropriate. This technical summary explores the unique characteristics of mini-roundabouts while reinforcing the need to apply the principles-based approach common to all roundabout design. It provides readers with an overview of the key considerations for planning, analysis, and design of mini-roundabouts. The information presented herein is a summary of principles outlined in the FHWA document Roundabouts: An Informational Guide [1] and the forthcoming 2nd Edition [2] (hereafter referred to as the Roundabout Guide), which is in progress at the time of this writing and due to be published in 2010. Specific considerations for single-lane and multilane roundabouts are summarized in a separate FHWA document titled Roundabout Technical Summary [3]. Figures are from the Roundabout Guide unless otherwise noted. Ad a p t e d f r o m P h o t o b y L e e R o d e g e r d t s ( u s e d w i t h p e r m i s s i o n ) Page 406 of 585 2 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts Page 407 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 3 Characteristics of Mini-RoundaboutsSection 1: A mini-roundabout is a type of intersection that can be used at physically-constrained locations in place of stop-controlled or signalized intersections to help improve safety problems and reduce ex- cessive delays at minor approaches [1]. Figure 1 illustrates the design features of a mini-roundabout; these features are described further later in this summary. Mini-roundabouts generally have an inscribed circle that is small enough to stay within the existing right-of-way (or within the existing curb lines if adequate space is available). Mini-roundabouts operate in the same manner as larger roundabouts, with yield control on all entries and counterclockwise circulation around a mountable (traversable) central island. Mini-roundabouts are distinguished from neighborhood traffic circles primarily by their traversable islands and yield control on all approaches, which allows them to function as other roundabouts do. Neighborhood traffic circles are typically built at the intersections of local streets for reasons of traffic calming and/or aesthetics. They typically are operated as two-way or all-way stop- controlled intersections and frequently do not include raised channelization to guide approaching traffic into the circulatory roadway. At some neighborhood traffic circles, left-turning vehicles must turn in front of the central island, potentially conflicting with other circulating traffic. To help promote safe operations, the design of mini- roundabouts generally aligns passenger cars on the approach in such a way as to naturally follow the circulatory roadway and minimize running over the central island to the extent possible. Due to the small footprint, large vehicles are typically required to over-run the fully traversable central island (as shown in Figure 1). Figure 1: Design Features of a Mini-Roundabout Page 408 of 585 4 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts Benefits of Mini-RoundaboutsSection 2: Mini-roundabouts are emerging in the United States as a potential intersection type. They may be an optimal solution for a safety or operational issue at an existing stop-controlled or signalized intersection where there is insufficient right-of-way for a standard roundabout installation. Of course, mini-roundabouts are not always feasible or optimal solutions for every problem. The benefits of mini-roundabouts, and some constraining factors (derived largely from international experience, particularly in the U.K., where mini-roundabouts were invented), are described below [4]. Motorists 3.1 As with other types of roundabouts, mini-roundabouts can enhance the safety for drivers, including older drivers, by: Allowing more time to make decisions, act, and react; • Reducing the number of directions in which a driver needs • to watch for conflicting traffic; and Reducing the need to judge gaps in fast traffic accurately. • Attention should be paid to the placement of signs and pavement markings to make them clear, visible, and Compact size – • A mini-roundabout can often be developed to fit within existing right-of-way constraints. Note that mini-roundabouts are generally not recommended for intersections with more than four legs. However, in some cases there may be adequate spacing between legs to allow for two closely-spaced mini- roundabouts. Operational Efficiency –• A mini-roundabout may provide less delay for a critical movement or for an overall intersection in comparison to other intersection alternatives. However, as with all roundabout types, mini- roundabouts do not provide explicit priority to specific users such as trains, transit, or emergency vehicles. Traffic Safety – • Mini-roundabouts have been used successfully in the U.K. to improve safety at intersections with known crash problems, with reported crash rate reductions of approximately 30 percent as compared to signalized intersections [5]. Traffic Calming – • Designed properly, a mini-roundabout reduces speeds and can be implemented as part of a broader traffic calming scheme. The low-speed environment also enhances the intersection for non- motorized users. However, mini-roundabouts cannot provide the same level of speed reduction as their larger counterparts and thus are less suited for roadways with speeds exceeding 30 to 35 mph (50 to 55 km/h). Access Management –• A mini-roundabout can be used to provide efficient access to a new or existing development. However, in the cases of large trucks and other large vehicles, the diameter may be too small to accommodate U-turn maneuvers that would be readily accommodated at a larger roundabout. Aesthetics – • In comparison to full-size roundabouts, mini-roundabouts do not allow opportunities for landscaping in the central island. As with comparably sized traditional intersections, landscaping opportunities are limited to the periphery of the intersection. Environmental Benefits –• A mini-roundabout may offer an environmental benefit compared to conventional intersections through reduced delay, fuel consumption, and vehicle emissions. User ConsiderationsSection 3: The various user types of a mini-roundabout have unique characteristics that should be considered in the planning and design process. Some of the characteristics of four user groups—motorists, pe - destrians, bicyclists, and emergency vehicles—are discussed here; a more complete discussion can be found in the Roundabout Guide. Page 409 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 5 Location ConsiderationsSection 4: As noted previously, mini-roundabouts are an intersection form that may have some traffic calm- ing properties. Because of their design characteristics, mini-roundabouts are most effective in lower speed environments in which all approaching roadways have posted speed of 30 mph or less and an 85th-percentile speed of less than 35 mph (55 km/h) near the proposed yield and/or entrance line [6]. For any location with an 85th-percentile speed above 35 mph (55 km/h), the mini-round- about can be included as part of a broader system of traffic calming measures to achieve an appro- priate speed environment. There are a number of locations where mini- roundabouts are commonly found to be advantageous and a number of situations that may adversely affect their feasibility. As with any decision regarding intersection treatments, care should be taken to understand the particular benefits and trade-offs for each project site. Common Site Applications4.1 Mini-roundabouts can be used at existing intersections to replace two-way stop control, all-way stop control, or a traffic signal. Mini-roundabouts can improve the operation of an intersection by reducing the dominance of the traffic flow from one direction over others, facilitating access and reducing delay to minor street movements, and improving overall intersection capacity [4]. Mini-roundabouts generally have a narrower range of applications than other types of roundabouts. The following applications represent some of the situations at which mini-roundabouts may be advantageous (further discussion can be found in the Roundabout Guide): Space-constrained locations with reasonable • approach speeds (30 mph [50 km/h] or less) – Because mini-roundabouts require less space than larger roundabouts, they may be a solution where a larger roundabout will not fit, provided that speeds are reasonable. Residential environments – • Mini-roundabouts offer a low-speed, low-noise intersection option that requires little ongoing maintenance. unambiguous to all users, including older drivers. Trucks and other large vehicles can be accommodated at a mini-roundabout by using mountable islands. Further details on design vehicles are provided later in this technical summary. Pedestrians3.2 Pedestrians are accommodated at pedestrian crosswalks around the perimeter of the mini-roundabout. The splitter islands at mini-roundabouts typically do not provide the same degree of refuge as those at other roundabouts, thus typically requiring pedestrians to cross the street in one stage (as with many conventional intersections). The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that all new and modified intersections, including roundabouts, be accessible to and usable by people with disabilities. The accessibility of mini-roundabouts to pedestrians with vision disabilities has not been specifically researched but is not expected to require treatments beyond those provided for similar single-lane roundabouts. Further discussion can be found in the Roundabout Guide. Bicycles3.3 Mini-roundabouts are generally located in environments where bicyclists are comfortable negotiating the roundabout as a motor vehicle. In the event a bicyclist desires to navigate the intersection as a pedestrian, sidewalks and crosswalks are provided. Emergency Vehicles3.4 Because of the traversable design of the central island and splitter islands, emergency vehicles are unlikely to have significant difficulty negotiating a mini-roundabout. Page 410 of 585 6 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts Intersections with high delay –• A roundabout can be an ideal application to reduce delay at stop-controlled intersections that do not meet signal warrants. Site Constraints4.2 Due to their smaller proportions, mini-roundabouts are not suitable for all locations. Certain site-related factors may significantly influence the design, requiring that a more detailed investigation of some aspects of the site be carried out. A number of these factors (many of which are valid for any intersection type) are listed below: High volumes of trucks will significantly reduce the • capacity of a mini-roundabout, as trucks will occupy most of the intersection when turning [1]. Additionally, high volumes of trucks overrunning the central island may lead to rapid wear of the roadway markings. Mini-roundabouts are not recommended in locations • in which U-turn truck traffic is expected, such as at the ends of street segments with medians or other access restrictions. However, in the expectation that U-turns are likely to occur, the design of a mini-roundabout should accommodate U-turns for passenger cars. Due to the small inscribed circle diameter, larger vehicles may not be capable of making a U-turn movement. Locations with light volumes of minor street traffic may not • provide a suitable location for a mini-roundabout. Major street vehicles may become conditioned over time to ignore the intersection control due to a lack of minor street vehicles presence, which requires major street drivers to slow and proceed cautiously through the intersection. One rule of thumb used in the U.K. is to have at least 10 percent of the total intersection volume generated from the minor street [7]. Another measure used in the U.K. is that mini- roundabouts should not be considered at intersections with volumes below 500 daily vehicles on the minor street [6]. Challenges for other types of roundabouts, including • physical complications, proximity to significant generators of traffic, and proximity to other traffic control devices (e.g., signalized intersections, at-grade rail crossings) or bottlenecks, etc., may make it politically or economically infeasible to construct a mini-roundabout. These and other conditions are discussed further in the Roundabout Guide and in the Technical Summary on Roundabouts. The existence of one or more of these conditions does not necessarily preclude the installation of a mini- roundabout. Experience in the United States is limited to date, but there may be comparable conditions in other countries where mini-roundabouts have successfully overcome one or more of the conditions listed above. To address these conditions, additional analysis, design work, and coordination with affected parties may be needed to resolve conflicts and help in the decision- making process. In some cases, the conditions identified above cannot be overcome, and another intersection type may be more suitable. Operational AnalysisSection 5: Mini-roundabouts are generally recommended for intersections in which the total entering daily traf- fic volume is no more than approximately 15,000 vehicles. While a mini-roundabout may perform acceptably at higher volume locations, there has been limited experience for such sites in the United States. Multilane mini-roundabouts have been used in the U.K. but are rare elsewhere. Operational performance models for mini-roundabouts have not been developed for U.S. conditions as of this writing. The calibration to U.S. drivers of international models, such as those from the U.K., has not been determined as of this writing. Page 411 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 7 Mini-roundabout design applies many of the same principles used for other types of roundabouts, including: Provide slow entry speeds and consistent speeds through • the roundabout by using deflection; Provide smooth channelization that is intuitive to drivers;• Provide adequate accommodation for the design vehicles; • Design to meet the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists; • and Provide appropriate sight distance and visibility.• The Roundabout Guide and/or the Technical Summary on Roundabouts provide more detailed design guidelines [2, 3]. The remainder of this document focuses on the design aspects and considerations that are unique to mini-roundabouts. Horizontal Design6.1 Mini-roundabout design applies many of the same principles and details of the design of larger roundabouts but with different emphasis areas. Given that the central island of a mini-roundabout is fully traversable, the overall design should provide channelization that naturally guides drivers to the intended path. Sub-optimal designs may result in drivers turning left in front of the central island (or driving over the top of it), improperly yielding, or traveling at excess speeds through the intersection. The following key horizontal design areas for considerations are highlighted below: size, design vehicle, design speed, central island, entrance line placement, and splitter islands. Size6.1.1 A mini-roundabout is often considered as an alternative to a larger, single-lane roundabout due to a desire to minimize impacts outside of the existing intersection footprint. Therefore, the existing intersection curb line is a typical starting point for establishing the mini- roundabout inscribed circle diameter. Mini-roundabouts should be made as large as possible within the intersection constraints. However, a mini-roundabout inscribed circle diameter generally should not exceed 90 ft (30 m). Above 90 ft (30 m), the inscribed circle diameter is typically large enough to accommodate the design vehicles navigating around a raised central island. A raised central island provides physical channelization to control vehicle speeds; therefore, a single-lane roundabout design is preferred where a diameter greater than 90 ft (30 m) can be provided. Design Vehicle6.1.2 The location and size of a mini-roundabout central island (and the corresponding width of the circulatory roadway) is dictated primarily by passenger car swept path requirements. The island location should be at the center of the left-turning inner swept paths which will be near, but not necessarily on, the center of the inscribed circle. The off-tracking of a large design vehicle should be accommodated by the footprint of the central island; meanwhile, passenger cars should be able to navigate through the intersection without being required to over- run the central island. As with single and multilane roundabouts, it is desirable to also accommodate buses within the circulatory roadway to avoid jostling passengers by over-running Design ConsiderationsSection 6: The geometric design of a mini-roundabout, as with other types of roundabouts, requires the balancing of competing design objectives. Roundabouts operate most safely when their geometry forces traffic to enter and circulate at slow speeds. Poor roundabout geometry has been found to negatively impact roundabout operations by affecting driver lane choice and behavior through the roundabout. Many of the geometric parameters are governed by the maneuvering requirements of the design vehicle and the accommodation of nonmotorized users. Thus, designing a roundabout is a process of determining the optimal balance between safety provisions, operational performance, and accommodation of design users. For these reasons, roundabout design techniques are difficult to standardize, and there is rarely only one “right” way to design a roundabout. Page 412 of 585 8 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts the central island. However, for very small inscribed circle diameters, the bus turning radius is typically too large to navigate around the central island while staying within the circulatory roadway, thus requiring buses to travel over the central island. The potential trade-off to designing for a bus instead of a passenger car is that the design may result in a wider circulatory roadway and smaller central island. Design Speed6.1.3 The location of the central island should allow for all movements to be accommodated at the intersection with counterclockwise circulation. Designing the central island size and location to provide deflection through the roundabout will encourage proper circulation and reduced speeds through the intersection. Central Island6.1.4 The central island is typically fully traversable and may either be domed or raised with a mountable curb and flat top for larger islands. Although painted central islands are commonly used in the U.K., flush central islands are discouraged in other countries to maximize driver compliance. Composed of asphalt concrete, Portland cement concrete, or other paving material, the central island should be domed using 5 to 6 percent cross slope, with a maximum height of 5 in (12 cm). Although fully mountable and relatively small, it is essential that the central island be clear and conspicuous. Islands with a mountable curb should be designed in a similar manner to truck aprons on normal roundabouts. Placement of Entrance Line6.1.5 The entrance line is integral to the geometric design of a mini-roundabout, and incorrect placement can introduce undesirable driver behavior. Figure 2 illustrates one particular situation where the design allows passenger cars to turn left in front of the central island. In this case, the combination of the intersection skew angle, small size of the central island, small size of the splitter islands, and large width of the circulatory roadway makes it comfortable for a driver to turn left in front of the central island instead of navigating around it introducing the risk of drivers taking this undesirable action. Two possible design improvements are illustrated in Figure 3: (a) advancing the entrance line forward, or (b) simultaneously enlarging the central island and reducing the circulatory roadway width, with the entrance line coincident with the inscribed circle of the roundabout. For the option of advancing the entrance line forward, the outer swept path of passenger cars and the largest vehicle likely to use the intersection are identified for all turning movements, and the advanced entrance line is placed at least 2 ft (0.6 m) outside of the vehicle paths. Skewed approaches are one particular situation where advancing the yield line may be beneficial to discourage vehicles from making a left-turn in front of the central island. However, this may result in a reduction of capacity, as advancing the yield line may affect yielding behavior at the entry. Splitter Islands6.1.6 As with larger roundabouts, splitter islands are generally used at mini-roundabouts to align vehicles, to encourage deflection and proper circulation, and to provide pedestrian refuge. Splitter islands are raised, mountable, or flush depending upon the size of the island and whether trucks will need to track over the top of the splitter island to navigate the intersection. In general, Figure 2: Undesirable Design that Allows Left Turns in Front of Central Island Page 413 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 9 raised islands are preferred over flush islands. The following are general guidelines for the types of splitter islands under various site conditions: Consider a • raised (nontraversable) island if one or more of the following conditions exist: All design vehicles can navigate the roundabout without - tracking over the splitter island area; Sufficient space is available to provide an island with a - minimum area of 50 ft2 (4.6 m2); and Pedestrians are present at the intersection with regular - frequency. Consider a • mountable (traversable) island if: Some design vehicles must travel over the splitter - island area and truck volumes are minor; and Sufficient space is available to provide an island - with a minimum area of 50 ft2 (4.6 m2). Consider a • flush (painted) island if: Vehicles are expected to travel over the splitter - island area with relative frequency to navigate the intersection; An island with a minimum area of 50 ft -2 (4.6 m2) can not be achieved; and The approach has low vehicle speeds (preferably - no more than 25 mph [40 km/h]). Figure 4 displays recommended longitudinal dimensions for splitter islands at mini-roundabouts. In some cases it may not be feasible to achieve the dimensions in Figure 4 due to narrow approach widths. Where necessary, the islands may only extend between the entrance line and the crosswalk. More details related to the design of the pedestrian refuge area are discussed in the next section on Pedestrian Design Treatments. In some cases, sufficient space may be available to provide a raised island within the pedestrian refuge area, but does not extend fully to the entrance line. An example of a raised island being terminated prior to the entrance line to accommodate the design vehicle Figure 3: Possible Design Improvements (a) Move entrance line forward (b) Enlarge central island Figure 4: Recommended Splitter Island Dimensions Figure 4: Recommended Longitudinal Dimensions for Splitter Islands at Mini-Roundabouts Page 414 of 585 10 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts is illustrated in Figure 5. If raised islands are used, care should be taken to ensure that they are visible to approaching motorists. Pedestrian Design 6.2 Treatments At conventional intersections, pedestrian ramps and pedestrian crossings are typically located near the curb returns at the corners of the intersection. When converting to a mini-roundabout, these corner pedestrian crossing locations will likely require relocation. The pedestrian crossing is recommended to be located 20 to 25 ft (6.1 to 7.6 m) upstream of the entrance line to accommodate one vehicle queue ahead of the crossing. Where a mountable or raised splitter island is used, the walkway through the splitter island should be “cut- through” instead of ramped. This is less cumbersome for wheelchair users and allows the cut-through walkway to be aligned with the crosswalks, providing guidance for all pedestrians, but particularly for those who are visually-impaired. The cut-through walkway should be approximately the same width as the crosswalk, ideally a minimum width of 10 ft (3 m). Sidewalk ramps are provided to connect to the sidewalks at each end of the crosswalk. Wherever sidewalks are separated from the roadway by a planting strip, ramps do not need flares and instead can have curbed edges aligned with the crosswalk, which provide alignment cues for pedestrians with visual impairments. A detectable warning surface consisting of raised truncated domes, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act, should be applied to each ramp. Where a minimum splitter island width of 6 ft (1.8 m) is available on the approach, a pedestrian refuge can be provided within the splitter island. In some cases, the available roadway width may not be sufficient to provide an adequate refuge area, in which case pedestrians will need to cross in one stage. Where a pedestrian refuge is provided, the refuge area must be defined with detectable warning surfaces that begin at the curb line and extend into the cut-through area a distance of 2 ft (0.6 m). This results in at least 2 ft (0.6 m) of clear space between detectable warning surfaces on a splitter island. Detailed standards for detectable warning surfaces can be found in the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) and through the U.S. Access Board [8]. Bicycle Design Treatments6.3 Since typical on-road bicycle travel speeds are approximately 12 to 20 mph (20 to 30 km/h), the speeds of vehicles approaching and traveling through mini- roundabouts are similar to those of bicyclists. Bicyclists are encouraged to navigate through a mini-roundabout as if they were a vehicle. Where bicycle lanes are provided on the approaches to a mini-roundabout, they should be terminated to alert drivers and bicyclists of the need for bicyclists to merge into traffic. One suggested practice is to terminate the bike lane at least 100 ft (30 m) upstream of the entrance line, provide a 50-ft (15-m) taper ending prior to the crosswalk at the roundabout entry, and use a dotted bike lane stripe for the last 50 to 200 ft (15 to 60 m) prior to the beginning of the taper [1]. For a more detailed description of bicycle design techniques, refer to the Roundabout Guide. Sight Distance and Visibility6.4 The principles of sight distance and visibility at mini- roundabouts are consistent with other roundabouts and other intersections. Detailed guidelines for evaluating sight distance and visibility are provided in the Roundabout Guide [2] and the Technical Summary on Roundabouts [3]. Vertical Design6.5 Mini-roundabouts should generally be designed to be outward draining to place the central island at the highest point of the intersection for maximum visibility. This technique of sloping outward is recommended primarily because it: Promotes safety by raising the height of the central island • and improving its visibility; Figure 5: Raised Splitter Island Terminated in Advance of the Entrance Line Ph o t o : L e e R o d e g e r d t s ( u s e d w i t h p e r m i s s i o n ) Page 415 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 11 Promotes lower circulating speeds; • Minimizes breaks in the cross slopes of the entrance and • exit lanes; and Drains surface water to the outside of the roundabout. • This is consistent with most standard intersection grading, where the high-point is located near the center of the intersection and slopes towards the outer curbs. Therefore, in most retrofit situations, installation of a mini-roundabout would not necessarily require significant grade modifications to the intersection. Pavement Markings and Signs6.6 At mini-roundabouts, pavement markings and signs work together to create a comprehensive system to guide and regulate road users. Pavement markings and signs are simpler at mini-roundabouts than at other types of roundabouts. The Federal Highway Administration has published the 2009 Edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which includes major revisions and additions related to signage and markings at roundabouts. For more detailed guidelines, designers should refer to the 2009 MUTCD and the Roundabout Guide [2, 9]. Pavement Markings6.6.1 Pavement markings for mini-roundabouts are largely similar to those for other roundabouts. However, because the islands may be either flush or mountable, additional pavement markings can be used to improve the visibility of key features, including the direction of circulation and splitter islands. A sample pavement marking plan for a mini-roundabout is given in Figure 6. A wide white dotted line is used to designate the entrance location, similar to other roundabouts. Some optional features include the following (not necessarily shown on Figure 6): Pavement marking arrows in the circulatory • roadway in front of each entry to indicate the direction of circulation; Yield lines and/or legends; • For flush splitter islands, an appropriate hatching pattern • (e.g., a diagonal hatch similar to those used for marking obstructions, such as those shown in Figure 3B-15 of the 2009 MUTCD [9]) within the splitter island envelope to further emphasize the splitter island location; Rumble strips or raised pavement markers within the • envelope of a flush splitter island to discourage light passenger vehicles from driving over top of the islands; and Yellow color over the entire central island.• If the entire center island is colored yellow, an anti-skid surface is recommended to increase surface friction and avoid slick surfaces, particularly for bicycles and motorcycles. A textured surface that provides a visible differentiation from the circulatory roadway and is accompanied by a solid yellow line may also be used. Note that vehicles overrunning a textured surface may create additional noise, which may be perceived as a problem in residential areas. Signing6.6.2 The principal difference in signing at mini-roundabouts compared to other roundabouts is that no signs can Figure 6: Sample Pavement Marking Plan for a Mini-Roundabout Page 416 of 585 12 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts be located within the fully mountable central island. As a result, the Circular Intersection (W2-6) warning sign is typically used on each approach in advance of the YIELD sign. YIELD signs are typically placed as close as practical to the entrance line and can be supplemented with a Roundabout Circulation plaque (R6-5P). Advance directional guide signs and exit guide signs are typically unnecessary given the size of the mini-roundabout and the nature of the approach roadways (generally low- speed local streets). However, standard street name signs should be used and are typically mounted on the same posts as the yield signs (similar to conventional intersections). Figure 7 gives a sample signing plan for a mini-roundabout. For splitter islands that are either painted or are fully mountable, KEEP RIGHT signs cannot be used. KEEP RIGHT signs may be provided for raised non-mountable islands, particularly where a pedestrian refuge is provided; however, care should be taken to ensure the sign does not obscure the view of the central island approaching the mini-roundabout. Some agencies are experimenting with illuminated bollards to mark splitter islands. Lighting6.7 It is important that mini-roundabouts, including their pedestrian crossing areas, be visible to approaching drivers. Consideration needs to be given to ensuring the intersection is conspicuous at night, which may mean providing additional street lighting. The Design Guide for Roundabout Lighting [10], published by the Illuminating Engineering Society, is the primary resource that should be consulted in completing a lighting plan for all roundabout types including mini- roundabouts. The Roundabout Guide also provides a summary of lighting principles, and the same principles for lighting traditional intersections apply to mini- roundabouts. Landscaping6.8 Landscaping of mini-roundabouts is minimal due to the traversable nature of the central island and (often) splitter islands. However, it is possible to provide landscaping around the perimeter of the intersection. Any landscaping that is provided should be designed to minimize roadside hazards and to maintain adequate stopping and intersection sight distance throughout the roundabout. Other Design Details and Applications6.9 More design details and applications of mini- roundabouts exist than are covered in this technical summary; however, some of the more notable considerations are described below: Right-turn bypass lanes –• Roundabouts and mini- roundabouts can employ right-turn bypass lanes similar to those used at conventional intersections. Bypass lanes are designed either to yield to exiting traffic or to form an additional lane next to exiting traffic (which may then merge into the exiting traffic). Access management – • Driveways in the vicinity of roundabouts and mini-roundabouts may experience restrictions in access similar to those in the vicinity of signalized intersections. Mini-roundabouts may offer the opportunity to include driveways as a curb cut or a fully developed approach with splitter islands depending on the volume characteristics and other factors. Figure 7: Sample Signing Plan for a Mini-Roundabout Page 417 of 585 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts 13 At-grade rail crossings –• At-grade rail crossings through or near a mini-roundabout introduce challenges related to the control of the rail crossing itself, queue clearance on the tracks, and the associated effects on the mini-roundabout. Mini-roundabouts have been installed near at-grade rail crossings in the U.K. Evacuation routes –• Mini-roundabouts can be located on evacuation routes by using similar manual control treatments (e.g., flagging, police control) that are used at other types of intersections. Vehicles are allowed to travel over the central island, if necessary. Bus stops –• Bus stops can be provided on either the entry or exit side of a mini-roundabout. Bus stops should not be provided within the circulatory roadway. Pedestrian access to and from the bus stop, including the location of the bus stop relative to the nearest crosswalk, should be carefully considered. Refer to the Roundabout Guide for additional information on these and other topics. CostsSection 7: Construction costs for mini-roundabouts vary widely depending upon the extent of sidewalk modi- fications or other geometric improvements and the types of materials used. In most cases, mini- roundabouts have been installed with little or no pavement widening and with only minor changes to curbs and sidewalks as shown in the example in Figure 8. Construction costs have ranged from about $50,000 for an installation consisting entirely of pavement markings and signage to $250,000 or more for mini-roundabouts that include raised islands and pedestrian improvements. A benefit-cost analysis may be useful for programming purposes, as it is recognizes that not all of the benefits and costs can be quantified by pure construction costs. The safety, operational, and environmental benefits of mini-roundabouts can be quantified and compared to the initial construction and ongoing maintenance cost over the life cycle of the roundabout. Although research is needed on the service lives of mini-roundabouts in the United States, they are likely to be comparable to the intersections they replace, depending on construction materials, weather conditions, traffic conditions, and other factors. When compared to signalized intersections, mini- roundabouts are likely to have longer service lives due to less maintenance. More detail can be found in the Roundabout Guide. Figure 8: Example Mini-Roundabout Ph o t o : M a r y l a n d S t a t e H i g h w a y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n (u s e d w i t h p e r m i s s i o n ) Page 418 of 585 14 FHWA | Mini-Roundabouts ReferencesSection 8: Robinson, B. W., L. Rodegerdts, W. Scarbrough, W. Kittelson, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, L. Bondzio, K. Courage, M. 1. Kyte, J. Mason, A. Flannery, E. Myers, J. Bunker, and G. Jacquemart. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Report FHWA-RD-00-067. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, June 2000. Rodegerdts, L. A., et al. 2. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, 2nd Edition. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 03-65A. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., Work in progress, estimated publication 2010. Rodegerdts, L. A., W. E. Scarbrough, and J. A. Bansen. 3. Roundabout Technical Summary. FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2010. Department for Transport and the County Surveyors Society. 4. Mini Roundabouts, Good Practice Guidance. Department for Transport, United Kingdom, November 27, 2006. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tss/gpg/ miniroundaboutsgoodpractice.pdf, accessed July 23, 2009. Bodé, Christian, and Faber Maunsell. “Mini-Roundabouts: Enabling Good Practice.” Proceedings, European 5. Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 18-20, 2006. Department for Transport. “TD 54/07, Design of Mini-Roundabouts.” 6. Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Volume 6, Road Geometry; Section 2, Junctions, Part 2. Department for Transport, United Kingdom, August 2007. Sawers, C. 7. Mini-Roundabouts: A Definitive Guide for Small and Mini-Roundabouts (Right Hand Drive Version). Moor Value Ltd. (U.K.), 2007. United States Access Board. Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility and Architectural Barriers Act 8. Accessibility Guidelines, July 2004. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 9. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2009. Illuminating Engineering Society. 10. Design Guide for Roundabout Lighting. Publication IES DG-19-08. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York, February 2008. Page 419 of 585 Page 420 of 585 For More Information Ed Rice Intersection Safety Team Leader, FHWA Office of Safety 202.366.9064 ed.rice@dot.gov Visit FHWA’s intersection safety web site to download this and other case studies highlighting proven intersection safety treatments from across the country: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection FHWA-SA-10-007 February 2010Page 421 of 585 Mini-roundabouts in Minnesota Benefits of Roundabouts with a Smaller Footprint and Lower Cost By William Stein, P.E.The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), cities, counties, and the consultant community have made great strides in utilizing a broader range of intersection types to solve transportation problems in Minnesota. By the end of the 2018 construction season, MnDOT and local agencies will have constructed 29 restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersections, six diverging diamond interchanges (DDI), two continuous Green T intersections, and more than 100 roundabouts. This article is reprinted with permission and was originally featured in the North Central Section Institute of Transpor- tation Engineers (NCITE) Summer 2017 newsletter. sh u t t e r s t o c k / s h a g a n e www.ite.org August 2018 35 CASE STUDY ATTACHMENT 3 Page 422 of 585 Early studies of mini-roundabouts in the U.S. indicate peak hour capacity of about 1,500 entering vehicles per hour. Capacity will vary based on the proportion of left-turn, straight through, and right-turn demands from each approach. A higher proportion of left-turn demand results in lower intersection capacity. High right-turn demand results in higher capacity. Shakopee—An Early Minnesota Success The first mini-roundabout constructed in Minnesota at a location with significant traffic was in Shakopee at the intersection of Vierling Drive and Spencer Street (County Road 79). The pre-con- struction intersection was All-Way STOP control with a four-lane cross section on Vierling Drive and two-lanes on Spencer Street. The intersection experienced poor operations, particularly in the AM and PM peak hours, with backups as long as 6 minutes along the north leg of the intersection during the PM peak. Figure 1: Peak-hour conditions at the All-Way STOP before construction. In 2012, Scott County and the City of Shakopee worked with the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Office of Safety Research and Development (R&D) to explore the feasibility of a mini-roundabout at this location. Microsimulation traffic analysis indicated that operations at the intersection could be dramatically improved with a mini-roundabout. The County and City moved forward with design and public outreach and the mini-roundabout was constructed in 3 weeks in June 2014, within the existing right of way (See Figure 2). Improved traffic operations were evident immediately and confirmed through video and traffic counts collected by the Office of Safety R&D as part of a national study. The post construction data collection was on November 19, 2014 shortly after some snowfall. The highest 15-minute count was 306 vehicles from 7:30 a.m. to 7:45 a.m. (equivalent to 1,224 vehicles per hour [vph]). The highest hourly vehicle count was 1,109 vph from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The long queues on the north leg have been eliminated. The more efficient operations also reduce fuel use and emissions. Another innovative solution that has gained a foothold in Minnesota is mini-roundabouts. There are currently eight mini-roundabouts in operation with several others programmed or in the planning stages. Table 1. Mini-roundabouts in Minnesota Constructed Mn Highway 4 (1st Ave) and Armstrong Blvd, St. James (2017) Mn Highway 4 (1st Ave) and 7th Street, St. James (2017) 18th Ave NW (County Road 112) and 48th St NW, Rochester (2017) Washington Street/4th Avenue/Military Road, Anoka (2017) Louisiana Avenue and South Park Drive, Savage (2016) Gilmore Avenue, near US 61, Winona (2016) Spencer Street (County Road 79) and Vierling Drive, Shakopee (2014) Railroad Drive/3rd Street NW/Irving Avenue NW, Elk River (2013) Programmed Roselawn Avenue and Edgerton Street, Maplewood (2020) Characteristics of Mini-Roundabouts Mini-roundabouts are most often used on urban and suburban collectors and should not be confused with small traffic calming circles that are sometimes used on residential streets. They can provide similar safety and operational benefits to standard roundabouts but on a much smaller footprint—normally within the area of the existing intersection. They are also more cost effective. Costs vary depending on the site, but a general construction cost for a mini-roundabout is around US$200,000. Standard roundabouts can be $1 million or higher, particularly for multi-lane roundabouts and roundabouts with significant approach reconstruction. Characteristics of mini-roundabouts include: Smaller size. The inscribed circle diameter is less than 90 feet. Acquiring additional right of way is normally not needed. Raised but traversable central island. A raised island provides physical channelization to reduce vehicle speeds. But the island is designed to be traversable, with no signs, landscaping, or other vertical objects. This allows trucks and other large vehicles to off-track over it, particularly for left turns. Splitter islands at the roundabout entrance are also normally raised, traversable, and free of vertical objects at the approach. Mini-roundabouts are used in urban and suburban locations where speeds are reduced. Most locations have speeds 35 mph or lower on the connecting roadways. Some have been installed in locations with 45 mph speeds. Volumes of large vehicles should be relatively low at mini-round- about locations. Transit corridors with large buses or busy truck routes may not be the best site for a mini-roundabout. FH W A O f f i c e o f S a f e t y , R & D d a t a c o l l e c t i o n v i d e o . 36 August 2018 ite journal Page 423 of 585 St. James—Mini-roundabouts in a Constrained Urban Setting Two mini-roundabouts were constructed as part of an urban recon- struction project along Mn Highway 4 in St. James. The context is much different than the Shakopee location as the mini-round- abouts are in a more constrained location through a small City downtown area. The intersections were previously signal controlled, connecting a street with a wide cross section and parallel parking (See Figure 3). Figure 3. One of the St. James intersections before construction with signal control and a wide cross section. Figure 2. Mini-roundabout at County Road 79 and Vierling Drive, Shakopee. In addition to the operational improvements, pedestrian safety was improved which was a particularly important community goal with the intersection’s proximity to Shakopee West Middle School and nearby residential areas. The sidewalk and trail network around the intersection were fully connected. The mini-roundabout geometry shortened pedestrian crossings and reduced conflict points. Before and after video clips of the Shakopee mini-roundabout are available from the FHWA—Minnesota Division, upon request.Downtown Aesthetics Concept Gazebo Landscape Berm/ Vegetative Screen Ornamental Trees Stamped/Stained Concrete Stamped/Stained Concrete Median Trash Receptacle Stamped/Stained Concrete Trash Receptacle Bench & Trash Receptacle PlanterPlanterBench PlanterPlanterBench PlanterPlanterBench City Park PlanterPlanterPlanterBench Trash Receptacle 10’20’ Scale: 1” = 20’ 5’ Pedestrian Access ZoneDrive LaneMedian 4’ - 19’ Amenity Zone 2’ 2’ Stamped/Stained Concrete Border2’ Stamped/Stained Concrete Border Raised Planter to Back of Bench 15’ Decorative Light Hanging Basket Stamped/Stained Concrete Median City Park 30’ Roadway Light Drive Lane ShoulderParking5’ Pedestrian Access Zone2’ 2’ - 9’ Amenity Zone 2’Pedestrian Ramp 3’1.5’2’8’2’1.5’15’ Lord’s & Lady’s St. James Publishing 5’ Pedestrian Access ZoneDrive LaneMedian 4’ - 19’ Amenity Zone 2’ 2’ Stamped/Stained Concrete Border2’ Stamped/Stained Concrete Border Raised Planter to Back of Bench 15’ Decorative Light Hanging Basket Stamped/Stained Concrete Median City Park 30’ Roadway Light Drive Lane ShoulderParking5’ Pedestrian Access Zone2’ 2’ - 9’ Amenity Zone 2’Pedestrian Ramp 3’1.5’2’8’2’1.5’15’ Lord’s & Lady’s St. James Publishing Typical Section: Looking East from West Roundabout Typical Section: Looking to Building Front Aesthetic Elements 6’ Bench Planter (5.5’ L x 1.5’ W x 2.5’ H)Trash Receptacle Stamped Concrete Pattern Stained Concrete Color To n y W i n i e c k i , S c o t t C o u n t y Go o g l e M a p s h t t p s : / / g o o . g l / m a p s / 5 j y n d 7 a q y J t Figure 4. Graphic of St. James mini-roundabouts and back-in angle parking. Mn D O T www.ite.org August 2018 37 Page 424 of 585 geometry at this location was challenging. The intersection has 5 legs, some significantly skewed, and the south leg of 4th Avenue is slightly offset. There are two entry points in the eastbound direction, one serving drivers on Washington Street and one serving drivers on Military Road. Washington Street is one-way on one side of the intersection and two-way on the other. The pedestrian crossings were long and also skewed. Figure 6. Difficult geometry and long pedestrian crossings at the Anoka intersection. Figure 7. Reconfigured intersection with mini-roundabout. During development of this project, the District worked very hard on outreach to the public and local elected officials. Several options were explored with the City and the public prior to choosing mini-roundabouts. The primary reasons for selecting the mini-roundabout option included: Reduced vehicle delay through the intersections compared to signals or all-way STOP control. Shorter pedestrian crossings. The proven safety performance of roundabouts. $600,000 lower construction cost compared to constructing new signals. On-street parking for adjacent businesses could be maintained. Parking was maximized by incorporating back-in, angle parking on one side. A graphic of the proposed design, including aesthetic treatments is shown in Figure 4. MnDOT and the City of St. James received a $934,000 Federal Accelerated Innovation Deployment grant for this portion of the project. In addition to the more urban context, another challenge at this location are agricultural trucks that use this section of Highway 4. In addition to traditional design tools like AutoTurn, the District striped out the geometry of the mini-roundabout design in a parking area and tested it with a WB-62 truck and a school bus to ensure that the design was feasible from that perspective. The construction of the mini-roundabouts was completed in the fall of 2017 (See Figure 5). A video on how to drive the mini-round- abouts and use the back-in, angle parking can be viewed here: www. dot.state.mn.us/d7/projects/hwy4stjames/howto.html. Figure 5. The St. James mini-roundabouts shortly after construction, October 2017. Anoka—Handling Difficult Geometry Similar to Shakopee, the City of Anoka installed their first mini-roundabout near a middle school. As shown in Figure 6, the Mn D O T Go o g l e M a p s Be n N e l s o n , C i t y o f A n o k a 38 August 2018 ite journal Page 425 of 585 The City reconfigured the intersection with a mini-roundabout, shown in Figure 7, that introduced similar and more intuitive approach geometry at each leg. Of particular note are the much shorter pedestrian crossings that are perpendicular to the approaches, which are especially beneficial near a heavy pedestrian location. Intersections that are No Longer “Alternative” Mini-roundabouts and several other less common intersection types have been proven in Minnesota and should no longer be viewed as “alternative” or “innovative.” Rather, they should be viewed as standard designs that should be a routine part of intersection control evaluation. In addition to roundabouts and mini-roundabouts, RCUT, DDI, and continuous Green T intersec- tions all fall into this category. There are several intersection types that have not yet been tried in the state that would have similar benefits. Signalized, urban expressways with safety and operational problems are excellent candidates for the Superstreet concept. The first signalized RCUT is scheduled for construction in 2019 at the intersection of Mn Highway 65 and Viking Boulevard in East Bethel. See this website for excellent animations that were created for this project: www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy65rci. Other intersection types that would be good solutions at certain locations include the median u-turn (Michigan Left) or thru-turn intersection, the quadrant roadway, the displaced left turn intersection, and others. Minnesota should continue to lead the way in using a broad range of intersection types, including mini-roundabouts, to design projects that deliver high performance at reduced cost. itej William (Will) Stein, P.E. is the safety and design engineer for the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Minnesota Division. Will has worked in the field of highway safety and highway design with FHWA, the Iowa and Minnesota Departments of Transportation, and the consulting firm CH2M Hill. One of his particular areas of interest is how innovative and alternative intersection types can be used to improve safety and traffic operations. JAMAR Technologies, Inc.For more details, call 800-776-0940 or visit www.jamartech.com • Watertight Pelican Case • Lightweight (3 lbs) Design • Real Time & Date Clock • No Battery Charging or Changing • USB Download & Flash Drive Ports • In stock, immediate delivery • Volume, Class, Speed & More • Axle Time Stamped Data • Full Keypad and LCD Display Why settle for less when you can have the best! Add analysis software for $500 Add tube installation kit for $500 Call your JAMAR Sales Rep for more details JAMAR Technologies Spring Sale Four TRAX Apollyons $3,499 JAMAR Technologies Spring Sale TRAX Apollyon Data Recorders SpringSpring www.ite.org August 2018 39 Page 426 of 585 ATTACHMENT #4 Page 427 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 12.d. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2020-669 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Update on Emergency Repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main and Determine that Emergency Conditions Continue to Require the Emergency Repair. DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Jarod Thiele, Public Works Management Analyst PRESENTER: Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2020-63 Yosemite Drive Water Main Emergency Work Summary: The City Council will review the status of the emergency award of contract to repair the Yosemite Drive Water Main, to comply with Public Contract Code Section 22050. Background: At their regular meeting of November 4, 2020, the City Council voted to adopt a resolution finding that emergency conditions would not allow sufficient time to publicly bid the repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main. Please refer to Attachment 1 for a copy of the resolution. The City Council awarded a contract to Wipf Construction under Public Contract Code Section 22050 to repair the Yosemite Drive Water Main. That section allows such repairs without competitive bidding in an emergency, if the City Council on a 4/5 vote makes specified finding. However, please note, that staff solicited quotes from two additional companies before making the award recommendation. Discussion: Under Public Contract Code 22050, Subsection (c)(1) the City Council is required to review the emergency action taken on November 4th at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the action is terminated. In reviewing the action, the City Council must determine whether the emergency conditions excusing competitive bidding continue for the repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main. It must make that finding by a 4/5 vote. The water main, water services, and trench paving work are complete. The final work to reconstruct the portion of the street damaged by the repeated water main breaks is anticipated to begin in the next couple of weeks. Recommended Action: Determine that emergency conditions continue to require the repair of the Yosemite Drive Water Main without competitive bidding. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Mary Horger, Financial Services Manager Page 428 of 585 Page 2 of 2 Page 429 of 585 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-63 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH APPROVING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 22050 THE EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT WITHOUT PUBLIC BIDDING OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO REPAIR THE WATER MAIN ON YOSEMITE DRIVE WHEREAS: 1.During normal operation of the City of Ukiah’s Water Distribution System, a portion of water main failed repeatedly on Yosemite Drive; and 2.Without the normal operation of this water main, the City is unable to provide necessary and immediate services to its residents which could lead to public health hazards; and 3.With damage caused to public property including streets, curb, gutter; and 4.With damage caused to private property including driveway aprons and driveways; and 5.The City Engineer estimates that it would take 120 days to develop plans and specifications to bid the construction work required to repair the water main and damaged public and private property, to advertise requests for bids, to award the bid and to commence construction and an additional 2-3 weeks to complete the work; and 6.Under Public Contract Code Section 22050(a)(1) in the case of an emergency, the City, pursuant to a four-fifths vote of the City Council, may repair or replace a public facility and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes, without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and 7.Under Public Contract Code Section 22050(a)(2) before the City Council takes such action, it must make a finding, based on substantial evidence set forth in the minutes of its meeting, that the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the action is necessary to respond to the emergency; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1.Based on the foregoing recitals and information, the City Council finds that an emergency condition exists that must be repaired to avoid public health hazards that could result, if the repair work was put out for competitive bids in compliance with the procedures required by the Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Act. 2.The City Council authorizes the procurement of construction services to repair the water main and damaged public and private property without providing notice inviting bids. 3.The City Council authorizes the City Procurement Officer to contract with Wipf Construction to repair the backwash basins at the WTP on the amount of $178,642. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 430 of 585 2 4.Awarding a contract to repair the water main and damaged public and private property is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act as a Class 2 categorical exemption, because it involves the replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity. (14 CCR §15302.) 5.The emergency action taken by this resolution shall terminate upon the City Council’s approval of a certificate of completion for the water main and public and private property repair work. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 2020, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Douglas F. Crane, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Councilmembers Mulheren, Brown, Scalmanini, Orozco, and Mayor Crane None None None Page 431 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 13.a. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-735 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Award Professional Services Agreement to GHD Inc. in the Amount of $416,856.69 to Prepare the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for Phase 2 of the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, and Utilities Project, and Approve Corresponding Budget Amendments. DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Jason Benson, Senior Civil Engineer PRESENTER: Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 1. RFP Downtown Streetscape Road Diet Utilities Project Phase 2 2. GHD Proposal_ Downtown Streetscape Road Diet Utilities Project Phase 2_ 04FEB2021 3. GHD_Cost Proposal_ 04FEB2021 Summary: The City Council will consider awarding a professional services agreement to GHD Inc. for preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate for Phase 2 of the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project, and approval of corresponding budget amendment. Background: This project will complete the design and prepare the plans, specifications, and estimate for Phase 2 of the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project. The project involves sidewalk improvements, construction of curb ramps, bulb outs and medians, relocation of new drain inlets and street lights, installation of street furniture, construction of a road diet to reduce four lanes to three lanes (two travel lanes and one left turn lane), paving, traffic signal modification, and replacement of existing water and sewer utilities. This project is also going to incorporate undergrounding of the electric utility. Although this contract will include the coordination of the undergrounding, the actual underground design is being performed by a separate design entity. Discussion: After developing the scope of work, the City of Ukiah issued a request for proposals (Attachment #1) and sent it to five local firms. In addition, staff posted the RFP on the City's website through eBidboard on December 23, 2020. In response to the City’s RFP, one consulting firm, GHD Inc., submitted a proposal. The Consultant Selection Committee consisting of City of Ukiah staff reviewed the proposal. GHD's proposal was found to be complete and responsive to the RFP requirements. The selection committee noted that GHD had completed the design of Phase 1 of the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape project and is currently involved in the Construction Management of the active construction project. GHD's billing rates are consistent with industry standards and their proposed cost does not exceed the City's independent cost estimate. GHD's proposal (Attachment #2) and the cost proposal (Attachment #3) are included with this report for reference. GHD's cost for the proposed work is $416,856.69. Staff recommends award of a professional services agreement to GHD Inc. in the amount of $416,856.69. The funding source for this project includes: Water, Sewer, and Streets (Measure Y). Recommended Action: Award professional services agreement to GHD Inc. in the amount of $416,856.69 to prepare the plans, specifications, and estimate for Phase 2 of the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, and Utilities Project, and approve corresponding budget amendments. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes. CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: $0 Page 432 of 585 Page 2 of 2 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: 82227113.80230.18234: $139,000; 84427221.80230.18234: $139,000; 12025200.80230.18234: $139,000 FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Page 433 of 585 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project Engineering Design & Right of Way Services- Phase 2 Date Released: December 23, 2020 City of Ukiah Department of Public Works 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482-5400 Proposals are due prior to 2:00 PM, February 4, 2021 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 434 of 585 TABLE OF CONTENTS Request for Proposals Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project Engineering Design & Right of Way Services Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description and Background .......................................................................................................... 4 Scope of Work ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix A – Proposal Requirements........................................................................................................ 9 Appendix B – Proposal Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 12 Appendix C – Project Schedule ................................................................................................................... 16 Appendix D – Additional Documents to Review ................................................................................. 17 Attachment 1 – Sample Professional Services Agreement Page 435 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 3 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 INTRODUCTION The City of Ukiah is requesting proposals (RFP) for engineering design & right of way services. The Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project will be funded with state and federal dollars requiring the Consultant to follow all pertinent local, State, and Federal laws and regulations. The DBE goal for this project is 2%. All DBE’s are encouraged to submit proposals. The proposals submitted in response to this RFP will be used as a basis for selecting the Consultant for this project. The Consultant’s proposal will be evaluated and ranked according to the criteria provided in Appendix B, “Proposal Evaluation,” of this RFP. Addenda to this RFP, if issued, will be sent to all prospective Consultants the City of Ukiah has specifically e- mailed a copy of the RFP to and will be posted on the City of Ukiah website at: http://www.cityofukiah.com/purchasing/ After opening this web page, just click on the “Current Requests for Proposals” button to find the RFP’s currently advertised by the City. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to check the City of Ukiah’s website to obtain any addenda that may be issued. The Consultant’s attention is directed to Appendix A, “Proposal Requirements.” Submit five (5) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy in PDF format on a CD/DVD or flash drive of the Consultant’s proposal. The hard copies and CD/DVD shall be mailed or submitted to th e City of Ukiah, Department of Public Works, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California 95482-5400 prior to 2:00 PM, February 4, 2021. Proposals shall be submitted in a sealed package clearly marked “Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project- Phase 2” and addressed as follows: Attn: Jason Benson City of Ukiah Department of Public Works 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482-5400 Proposals received after the time and date specified above will be considered nonresponsive and will be returned to the Consultant. Any proposals received prior to the time and date specified above may be withdrawn or modified by written request of the Consultant. To be considered, however, the modified Proposal must be received prior to 2:00 PM, February 4, 2021. Unsigned proposals or proposals signed by an individual not authorized to bind the prospective Consultant will be considered nonresponsive and rejected. This RFP does not commit the City of Ukiah to award a contract, to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal for this request, or to procure or contract for services. The City of Ukiah reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals received as a result of this request, to negotiate with any qualified Consultant, or to modify or cancel in part or in its entirety the RFP if it is in the best interests of the City of Ukiah to do so. Furthermore, a contract award may not be made based solely on price. The prospective Consultant is advised that should this RFP result in recommendation for award of a contract, the contract will not be in force until it is approved and fully executed by the City of Ukiah. Page 436 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 4 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 All products used or developed in the execution of any contract resulting from this RFP will remain in the public domain at the completion of the contract. Any questions related to this RFP shall be submitted in writing to the attention of Jason Benson via email at jbenson@cityofukiah.com Questions shall be submitted before 5:00 PM on February 1, 2021. No oral question or inquiry about this RFP/RFQ shall be accepted. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND This project combines two separate components: Downtown Streetscape and utilities. For purposes of tracking project funding, the consultant’s invoices shall bill separately for the grant eligible and non-grant eligible components. This proposed project involves streetscape improvements along State Street from approximately 1000 feet from the south side of Mill Street to the north side Gobbi Street and approximately 800 feet from the north side of Henry Street to the north side of Norton Street. Specific components of the project include the following: sidewalk widening, construction of curb ramps and bulb outs, relocation of drain inlets and pi pes, construction of Low Impact Development (LID) storm water enhancement features, relocation of existing street lights, installation of new street lights, installation of new traffic signals, installation of street furniture and street trees and irrigation system and replacement of water and sewer systems. Sidewalk Improvements Sidewalk improvements are proposed on State Street from the south side of the Mill Street intersection to the north side of the Gobbi Street intersection and the north side of the Henry Street intersection to the north side of the Norton Street intersection. Sidewalk improvements are intended to address damaged areas, cross slope issues and accessibility requirements, and would not extend beyond the public right of way or property lines. Where new sidewalk, driveway and ramp improvements conform to private improvements at the public right of way or property lines, temporary construction easements (TCEs) will be obtained for any work required on private property. The widened sidewalks would accommodate new planter areas, street trees and irrigation, tree grates, street furnishings (benches, recycling and trash containers, bicycle racks, signage, bollards, street lights etc.), outdoor restaurant/café seating opportunities, and other street beautification and pedestrian amenities. The width of new sidewalks is expected to be between 8 feet and 15.5 feet depending on the existing right of way and property lines, and to provide consistency in width throughout the downtown area. Curb Ramps, Bulb Outs and Medians New ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps will be constructed at intersection pedestrian crossing locations . Specifically, intersections on State Street within the Project area will be retrofitted with bulb-outs at the south side of Mill Street and at the north side of Henry Street and the intersections of Scott Street and Norton Street as reflected in the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan adopted by the Ukiah City Council. Bulb- outs would extend out into the street 6 feet to 8 feet to reduce street crossing distances for pedestrians, slow down traffic, and provide additional space for sidewalk, landscape and LID improvements. Raised medians are also proposed on State Street south of Mill Street to north of Gobbi Street and south of Norton Street to between Scott Street and Henry Street. The medians provide an opportunity for additional street trees and landscaping. Relocation of Drain Inlets and Street Lights Minor reconstruction or relocation of curb inlets and associated storm drain piping is expected to facilitate new curb lines and for incorporation with LID features. The replacement and addition of streetlight poles is expected along State Street to facilitate new sidewalk and bulb out improvements. Road Diet and Lane Modifications A road diet is proposed to be constructed on State Street between Mill Street and Gobbi Street and Henry Street and Norton Street. The intent of the road diet improvements is to transform the existing four-lane State Street cross section into a three-lane cross section with one travel lane in each direction and a two-way left-turn Page 437 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 5 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 (TWLT) lane in the center. The TWLT lanes would transition to left turn pockets at intersections . The purpose of the road diet is to maintain or enhance the State Street corridor vehicular capacity, reduce intersection congestion by providing center turn pockets that allow left turning vehicles to move out of the main flow of traffic, enhance pedestrian visibility and safety, and provide space for streetscape and p edestrian improvements. Signal Modifications Signal modifications would be made at each of the three State Street signalized intersections in the project area (Gobbi Street, Scott Street, and Norton Street) to provide vehicle detection, improve signal co ordination, and replace signal heads to support the above described road diet improvements and new signal phasing and timing. Traffic Signal replacement at the intersection of Scott Street and Norton Street will include all poles, mast arm poles, signal heads, pedestrian facilities, cabinets and the installation of Iteris Vantage Next Camera Detection System. The intersection of Gobbi Street will involve painting the existing traffic signal poles and installation of Iteris Vantage Next Camera Detection System. Paving and Markings This project also proposes to rehabilitate the surface of State Street with new hot mix asphalt pavement between Henry Street and Norton Street and Mill Street and Gobbi Street as well as new striping and pavement markings to accommodate the road diet, transitions at the northerly and southerly project limits, and other street improvements. Utilities Sanitary Sewer – Replace existing 6-inch sanitary sewer with a new 12-inch line for the entire project limits of State Street, approximately 1,800 lineal feet, complete with new manholes, etc. In addition, new sewer laterals with cleanouts are proposed for all services along the project limits. Water Main Line –Abandon 2 existing 6-inch PVC water main lines and install one 12-inch water line for the entire project limits of State Street for approximately 1,800 lineal feet, complete with new water valves, fire hydrants, etc. In addition, new water and fire service lines with meter boxes and backflow devises (as required) are proposed for all services along the project limits. Electric, Phone and Cable – A Rule 20, joint trench to accommodate electric and communication facilities will be designed separately by the City of Ukiah Electric Utility and provided to Consultant to resolve conflicts and incorporate into final design. The Electric Utility will acquire any easements needed for its facilities. Consultant will be responsible for identifying obstructions and obstacles between the Joint Trench Design and the Downtown Streetscape and Utilities Design and resolving all conflicts. Consultant will also be responsible to incorporate the Electric Utility’s Joint Trench Design into to the 30%, 60%, 90% and final design submittals. Page 438 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 6 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 SCOPE OF WORK General: The City of Ukiah is interested in contracting with a Consultant that will conduct and coordinate specified tasks related to advancing the Downtown Streetscape and Utilities Project Phase 2 to the construction phase. The work shall comply with the requirements of all of the following withou t limitation, and shall apply to this RFP and any subsequent contract as though incorporated herein by reference: 1. Federal laws 2. State laws 3. Local laws 4. Rules and regulations of governing utility districts 5. Rules and regulations of other authorities with jurisdiction over the procurement of products The Consultant shall comply with all insurance requirements of the City of Ukiah, included in the sample contract in Attachment 2. Services to be Provided: The Consultant selected shall provide all services to complete engineering design and right-of-way (as necessary) for the Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project. Specifically, the Consultant selected will be required to complete the following tasks:  Project Management – Jason Benson, Senior Engineer serve as the contract manager and direct liaison between the Consultant and Caltrans District #1 Division of Local Assistance. The consultant shall be responsible for project management activities throughout the life of the contract and the scope of activities includes but is not limited to, coordinating and being responsible for scheduling meetings, managing the project schedule, preparing and distributing minutes, field reviews, tracking action items for the City of Ukiah and consultant sub-contractors, and preparing all submissions for the City of Ukiah to submit to Caltrans Local Assistance. Any modifications proposed to this solicitation are welcome provided they are innovative, advanced, and well thought out methodologies and shall be identified as optional and priced out separately in the sealed fee proposal.  Surveys and Mapping – The Consultant shall be responsible for data collection, mappi ng and surveying necessary for preliminary engineering, design, cost estimates, right-of-way impacts, and the level of environmental clearance. The scope of comprehensive base mapping and surveying includes but is not limited to Control Surveys, Aerial Photogrammetry, Limited Design Level Topographic Surveys, Right-of-Way Retracement, and a Record of Survey. This work is subject to the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Prevailing Wage and Registration Requirements.  Utility Coordination –Successful Engineering Company will coordinate the Downtown Streetscape and Utilities Project design with Joint Trench design to avoid conflicts. The City of Ukiah Electric Utility will provide 30% design drawings upon award of contract that will include identified conflicts associated with the Joint Trench design that need to be resolved in the final design. Consultant, working with the Electric Utility and the Public Works depart ment, will be responsible for resolving any and all design conflicts. Utilities within the project limits include but are not limited to: City of Ukiah water lines; City of Ukiah sewer lines, City of Ukiah storm drains, City of Ukiah electric lines and street lights, PG&E gas lines, AT&T telephone lines, and Comcast cable TV lines.  Right of Way Phase & Determination – Consultant shall prepare temporary construction easements for the Right of Way Phase using procedures outlined in the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Page 439 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 7 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 Manual. For this project, Consultant shall prepare and obtain temporary construction easements from all of the property owners where sidewalk construction will border private property. Consultant shall prepare the Right of Way Certification using procedures outlined in the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.  Design – Consultant shall be responsible for issuing a complete design package that incorporates joint trench design (provided by the City of Ukiah Electric Utility) and resolves multi utility design conflicts. Consultant to ensure the Downtown Streetscape and Utilities Design does not conflict with the Electric Utility’s Joint Trench design. Consultant shall resolve any design conflicts between both desig ns. Design the improvements and prepare the plans, specifications, and estimates in accordance with Caltrans Standards, complete street guidelines, and AASHTO Geometric Design guidelines to achieve project objectives. Consultant shall examine and present project alternatives, as necessary, which complete project goals within construction budget. Plan sheets shall be submitted to the City of Ukiah and Utilities at 30%, 90%, and final contract documents. Consultant shall be responsible for preparing all documents and obtaining California Division of State Architect approval of the plans.  Review and consider the documents in Attachment 1: Streetscape Conceptual Plan, Design documents for Downtown Streetscape Phase I, Recommendations from the Tree Advisory Group (TAG).  Coordination with Adjacent Properties – Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding sidewalk and other modifications required in front of their property such as tree planting, driveway locations, installation of sidewalk furniture, or tree removal.  Construction Phase Authorization – Consultant shall prepare the entire Request for Allocation (Streetscape) documents to advance the project to Construction phase using procedures outlined in the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.  Bid Process – Provide an electronic copy of the final approved plans and specifications, a hard copy of the final approved plans, and a hard copy of the final approved specifications. The electronic copy of the plans shall be provided as both AutoCAD files and PDF files, and the electronic copy of the specifications shall be provided in both Microsoft Word format and PDF format. City of Ukiah will be responsible for making copies of contract documents and will distribute to plan rooms and contractors. Consultant shall respond to questions that arise during the bid phase and prepare addendums which will be distributed by the City of Ukiah as necessary.  Contract Term – Contract amendments are required to modify the terms of the original contract for changes such as extra time, added work, or increased costs and must be done prior to expiration of the original contract. Only work within the original advertised scope of services shall be added by amendment to the contract.  Method of Payment – The method of payment shall be Actual Cost Plus Fixed Fee in accordance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Consultant shall identify in proposal if there are any other items that they anticipate will need to be addressed in order to obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans. Minimum Qualifications of Personnel – The Consultant shall meet the appropriate minimum qualifications as required by this contract. Equipment Requirements - The Consultant shall have and provide adequate office equipment and suppl ies to complete the work required by this Contract. Consultant shall have and provide adequate field tools, instruments, equipment, materials, supplies, and safety equipment to complete the required field work and that meet or exceed Caltrans Specifications per the Caltrans Manuals. Page 440 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 8 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 Quality Control/Assurance Measures – Implementing and maintaining quality control procedures to manage conflicts, insure product accuracy, and identify critical reviews and milestones. Conflict of Interest Requirements - Throughout the term of the awarded contract, any person, firm or subsidiary thereof who may provide, has provided or is currently providing Design Engineering Services and/or Construction Engineering Services under a contractual relationship with a construct ion contractor(s) on any local project listed in this Scope of Work must disclose the contractual relationship, the dates and the nature of the services. The prime consultant and its subconsultants shall also disclose any financial or business relationship with the construction contractor(s) who are working on the projects that are assigned for material Quality Assurance services through task orders on the contract. Similar to the disclosures regarding contractors, all firms are also required to disclose throughout the term of the awarded contract, any Design Engineering services including claim services, Lead Project Management services and Construction Engineering Services provided to all other clients on any local project listed in this Scope of Work. In addition to the disclosures, the Consultant shall also provide possible mitigation efforts, if any, to eliminate or avoid any actual or perceived conflicts of interest. The Consultant shall ensure that there is no conflict before providing services to any construction contractor on any of the agency’s projects’ listed in this Scope of Work. The submitted documentation will be used for determining potential conflicts of interest. If a Consultant discovers a conflict during the execution of an assigned task order, the Consultant must immediately notify the Contract Manager regarding the conflicts of interest. The Contract Manager may terminate the Task Order involving the conflict of interest and may obtain the conflicted services in any way allowed by law. Failure by the Consultant to notify the Contract Manager may be grounds for termination of the contract. Project Schedule – In order to assess duration and resources, the project planning and scheduling of tasks should be provided using commercially available scheduling software. Page 441 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 9 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 APPENDIX A – PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS These guidelines are provided for standardizing the preparation and submission of Proposal/Proposals by all Consultants. The intent of these guidelines is to assist Consultants in preparation of their proposals, to simplify the review process, and to help assure consistency in format and content . Proposals shall contain the following information in the order listed: 1. Introductory Letter The introductory (or transmittal) letter shall be addressed to: Jason Benson, Senior Engineer City of Ukiah, Department of Public Works 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482-5400 The letter shall be on Consultant letterhead and include the Consultant’s contact name, mailing address, telephone number, facsimile number, and email address. The letter will address the Consultant’s understanding of the services being requested and any other pertinent information the Consultant believes should be included. All addendums received must be acknowledged in the transmittal letter. The letter shall be wet-signed in blue ink by the individual authorized to bind the Consultant to the proposal. 2. Executive Summary 3. Consultant Information, Qualifications & Experience The City of Ukiah will only consider submittals from Consultants that demonstrate they have successfully completed comparable projects. These projects must illustrate the quality, type, and past performance of the project team. Submittals shall include a detailed description of a minimum of three (3) projects within the past five (5) years which include the following information: 1. Contracting agency 2. Contracting agency Project Manager 3. Contracting agency contact information 4. Contract amount 5. Funding source 6. Date of contract 7. Date of completion 8. Consultant Project Manager and contact information 9. Project Objective 10. Project Description 11. Project Outcome 4. Organization and Approach 1. Describe the roles and organization of your proposed team for this project. Indicate the composition of subcontractors and number of project staff, facilities available and experience of your team as it relates to this project. 2. Describe your project and management approach. Provide a detailed description of how the team and scope of work will be managed. 3. Describe the roles of key individuals on the team. Provide resumes and references for all key team members. Resumes shall show relevant experience, for the Project’s Scope of Work, as well as the length of employment with the proposing Consultant. Key members, especially the Project Manager, Page 442 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 10 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 shall have significant demonstrated experience with this type of project, and should be committed to stay with the project for the duration of the project. 5. Scope of Work 1. Include a detailed Scope of Work Statement describing all services to be provided. 2. Describe project deliverables for each phase of your work. 3. Describe your cost control and budgeting methodology for this project. 4. Provide responses to the following: a. Describe critical engineering design issues associated with the project and how you will address these. b. Describe critical environmental issues and how you will address these. c. How cost and schedule could be minimized. 6. Schedule of Work Provide a detailed schedule for all phases of the project and the proposing Consultant’s services including time for reviews and approvals. The schedule shall meet the Project Schedule shown in Appendix C, however, expedited schedules are preferred with justification for timeline feasibility. 7. Conflict of Interest Statement The proposing Consultant shall disclose any financial, business or other relationship with the City of Ukiah that may have an impact upon the outcome of the contract or the construction project. The Consultant shall also list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this contract or the construction project that will follow. The proposing Consultant shall disclose any financial interest or relationship with any construction company that might submit a bid on the construction project. 8. Litigation Indicate if the proposing Consultant was involved with any litigation in connection with prior projects. If yes, briefly describe the nature of the litigation and the result. 9. Professional Services Agreement Indicate if the proposing Consultant has any issues or needed changes to the proposed professional services agreement included as Attachment 2. The Consultant shall provide a brief statement affirming that the proposal terms shall remain in effect for ninety (90) days following the date proposal submittals are due. A contract will not be awarded to a consultant without an adequate financial management and accounting system as required by 48 CFR Part 31 and 2 CFR Part 200. 10. Federal-Aid Provisions The proposing Consultant’s services are federally funded, which necessitate compliance with additional requirements. Special attention is directed to Attachment 3 – Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit (LAPM) 10-I, Notice to Proposers DBE Information. The proposing Consultant shall complete and submit the following forms with the proposal to be considered responsive. These forms and instructions are provided for the proposer in Attachment 3.  Local Agency Proposer DBE Commitment (Consultant Contracts); (LAPM 10-O1). The local agency’s current contract DBE Goal is 2%.  Notice to Proposers DBE Information (LAPM 10-I) Page 443 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 11 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2  DBE Information - Good Faith Effort (LAPM 15-H) – Required only if DBE goal is not achieved. It is recommended that proposer prepare and submit a GFE irrespective of meeting the DBE goal.  Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (LAPM 10-Q)  Cost Proposal Form (LAPM 10-H1) Upon award and through completion of the project, the successful proposing Consultant will be required to follow applicable federal-aid requirements and shall complete and submit with the agreement the following forms at the time of award:  Local Agency Proposer DBE Information (Consultant Contracts) (LAPM 10-O2)  Any other relevant forms required during the project. Consultant shall demonstrate familiarity of providing services for federally funded projects and has clear understanding of requirements/needs to facilitate the project through Caltrans Local Assistance and Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 11. Cost Proposal The consultant’s cost proposal method of payment shall be Actual Cost Plus Fixed Fee in accordance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual. In order to assure that the City of Ukiah is able to acquire professional services based on the criteria set forth in the Brooks Act and Government Code 4526, the proposal shall include a cost proposal for each service of the proposal. Proposing Consultants may be required to submit certified payroll records, as required. Cost proposal shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope from the proposal marked “Cost Proposal - Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project”. The cost proposal is confidential and will be unsealed after all proposals have been reviewed, and most qualified consultant has been selected. Reference sample cost estimate in Attachment 3 LAPM 10-H, Example #1. Selected Consultant shall comply with Chapter 10 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual regarding the A&E Consultant Contract Audit and Review process. 12. Addenda. If it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFP after it has been issued, the City will issu e an addendum to the RFP containing the revision. All addenda will be posted on the City’s website at www.cityofukiah.com/purchasing with the rest of the RFP documents. Anyone who intends to submit a proposal in response to the RFP must register as a plan holder on the City’s website and check the website frequently for any posted addenda. Anyone submitting a proposal will be deemed to have seen and agreed to be bound by the posted addenda. Page 444 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 12 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 APPENDIX B – PROPOSAL EVALUATION Evaluation Process All proposals will be evaluated by a City of Ukiah Selection Committee (Committee). The Committee may be composed of City of Ukiah staff and other parties that may have expertise or experience in the services described herein. The Committee will review the submittals and will rank the proposers. The evaluation of the proposals shall be within the sole judgment and discretion of the Committee. All contacts during the evaluation phase shall be through the City of Ukiah Contract Administrator/Project Manager only. Proposers shall neither contact nor lobby evaluators during the evaluation process. Attempts by Proposer to contact members of the Committee may jeopardize the integrity of the evaluation and selection pr ocess and risk possible disqualification of Proposer. The Committee will evaluate each proposal meeting the qualification requirements set forth in this RFP. Proposers should bear in mind that any proposal that is unrealistic in terms of the technical or schedule commitments may be deemed reflective of an inherent lack of technical competence or indicative of a failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of the City of Ukiah’s requirements as set forth in this RFP. Upon completion of the evaluation and selection process, only the cost proposal from the most qualified consultant will be opened to begin cost negotiations. All unopened cost proposals will be returned at the conclusion of procurement process. Upon acceptance of a cost proposal and successful contract negotiations, staff will recommend a contract be awarded. Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be evaluated according to each Evaluation Criteria, and scored on a zero to five point rating per the rating scale shown following. The scores for all the Evaluation Criteria will then be multiplied according to their assigned weight to arrive at a weighted score for each proposal. A proposal with a high weighted total will be deemed of higher quality than a proposal with a lesser -weighted total. The final maximum score for any project is five hundred (500) points. Rating Scale 0 Not Acceptable Non-responsive, fails to meet RFP specifications. The approach has no probability of success. For mandatory requirement this score will result in disqualification of proposal. 1 Poor Below average, falls short of expectations, is substandard to that which is the average or expected norm, has a low probability of success in achieving project objectives per RFP. 2 Fair Has a reasonable probability of success, however, some objectives may not be met. 3 Average Acceptable, achieves all objectives in a reasonable fashion per RFP specification. This will be the baseline score for each item with adjustments based on interpretation of proposal by Evaluation Committee members. 4 Above Average/Good Very good probability of success, better than that which is average or expected as the norm. Achieves all objectives per RFP requirements and expectations. 5 Excellent/ Exceptional Exceeds expectations, very innovative, clearly superior to that which is average or expected as the norm. Excellent probability of success and in achieving all objectives and meeting RFP specification. Page 445 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 13 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 The Evaluation Criteria Summary and their respective weights are as follows: No. Written Evaluation Criteria Weight 1 Completeness of Response Pass/Fail 2 Qualifications & Experience 25 3 Organization & Approach 20 4 Scope of Services to be Provided 20 5 Schedule of Work 20 6 Conflict of Interest Statement Pass/Fail 7 Local Presence 5 8 References 10 Total: 100 1. Completeness of Response (Pass/Fail) a. Responses to this RFP must be complete. Responses that do not include the proposal content requirements identified within this RFP and subsequent addenda and do not address each of the items listed below will be considered incomplete, be rated a Fail in the Evaluation Criteria and will receive no further consideration. Responses that are rated a Fail and are not considered may be picked up at the delivery location within 14 calendar days of c ontract award and/or the completion of the competitive process. 2. Qualifications & Experience (25 points) a. Relevant experience, specific qualifications, and technical expertise of the firm and sub - consultants to conduct traffic engineering services on both federal and nonfederal-aid projects. 3. Organization & Approach (20 points) a. Describes familiarity of project and demonstrates understanding of work completed to date and project objectives moving forward b. Roles and Organization of Proposed Team i. Proposes adequate and appropriate disciplines of project team. ii. Some or all of team members have previously worked together on similar project(s). iii. Overall organization of the team is relevant to City of Ukiah needs. c. Project and Management Approach i. Team is managed by an individual with appropriate experience in similar projects. This person’s time is appropriately committed to the project. ii. Team successfully addresses Site Planning and Programming efforts. iii. Project team and management approach responds to project issues. Team structure provides adequate capability to perform both volume and quality of needed work within project schedule milestones. d. Roles of Key Individuals on the Team i. Proposed team members, as demonstrated by enclosed resumes, have relevant experience for their role in the project. ii. Key positions required to execute the project team’s responsibilities are appropriately staffed. e. Working Relationship with City of Ukiah Page 446 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 14 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 i. Team and its leaders have experience working in the public sector and knowledge of public sector procurement process. ii. Team leadership understands the nature of public sector work and its decision- making process. iii. Proposal responds to need to assist City of Ukiah during the project. 4. Scope of Services to be Provided (20 points) a. Detailed Scope of Services to be Provided i. Proposed scope of services is appropriate for all phases of the work. ii. Scope addresses all known project needs and appears achievable in the timeframes set forth in the project schedule. b. Project Deliverables i. Deliverables are appropriate to schedule and scope set forth in above requirements. c. Cost Control and Budgeting Methodology i. Proposer has a system or process for managing cost and budget. ii. Evidence of successful budget management for a similar project. 5. Schedule of Work (20 points) a. Schedule shows completion of the work within or preferably prior to the City of Ukiah overall time limits as specified in Appendix C. b. The schedule serves as a project timeline, stating all major milestones and required submittals for project management and Federal-Aid compliance. c. The schedule addresses all knowable phases of the project, in accordance with the general requirements of this RFP. 6. Conflict of Interest Statement (Pass/Fail) a. Discloses any financial, business or other relationship with the City of Ukiah that may have an impact upon the outcome of the contract or the construction project. b. Lists current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this contract or the construction project that will follow. c. Discloses any financial interest or relationship with any construction company that might submit a bid on the construction project. 7. Local Presence (5 points) a. A statement addressing firm’s ability to establish an office within the County or surrounding area. 8. References (10 points) a. Provide as reference the name of at least three (3) agencies you currently or have previously consulted for in the past three (3) years. Page 447 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 15 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 Weighted scores for each Proposal will be assigned utilizing the table below: No. Evaluation Criteria Rating (0-5) Weight Score (Rating x Weight) 1 Completeness of Response N/A Pass/Fail Pass/Fail 2 Qualifications & Experience 25 3 Organization & Approach 20 4 Scope of Services to be Provided 20 5 Schedule of Work 20 6 Conflict of Interest Statement N/A Pass/Fail Pass/Fail 7 Local Presence 5 8 References 10 Total: 100 Page 448 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 16 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 APPENDIX C – PROJECT SCHEDULE Proposals due – February 4, 2021 City Council awards professional services agreement – February 17, 2021 Submit 30% contract documents with Electric Utility Design incorporated- March 19, 2021 City review and provide comments to 30% documents- April 9, 2021 Submit 60% contract documents – May 21, 2021 City review and provide comments to 60% documents- June 11, 2021 Conduct public workshop on project- June 2021 Submit 90% contract documents- July 23, 2021 City review and provide comments to 90% documents- August 13, 2021 Submit the final Issue for Bid documents to City- September 10, 2021 Provide bid assistance – September 2021 through November 2021 Submit final contract documents, ROW certification, request for allocation, and request for authorization- April, 2022 CTC allocation of project – June, 2022 Page 449 of 585 City of Ukiah Request for Proposals Page 17 Downtown Streetscape & Utilities Project Phase 2 APPENDIX D – ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS TO REVIEW The following documents are available to review: Downtown Streetscape Improvement Project Plans and Specification, Phase 1 http://www.cityofukiah.com/streetscape/ Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report https://cityofukiah.box.com/v/UkiahDowntownStreetscapePhase2 Ukiah Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan- FINAL https://cityofukiah.box.com/v/UkiahDowntownStreetscapePhase2 Page 450 of 585 COU No. ______________ Std – ProfSvcsAgreement- November 20, 2008 PAGE 1 OF 7 Attachment #1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 2008 (“Effective Date”), by and between CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "City" and _________________, a _____________ [sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, etc.] organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of ______________, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". RECITALS This Agreement is predicated on the following facts: a. City requires consulting services related to ________________________________. b. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, skills, experience and properly licensed to provide these services, and is willing to provide them according to the terms of this Agreement. c. City and Consultant agree upon the Scope-of-Work and Work Schedule attached hereto as Attachment "A", describing contract provisions for the project and setting forth the completion dates for the various services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. TERMS OF AGREEMENT 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1.1 The Project is described in detail in the attached Scope-of-Work (Attachment "A"). 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 As set forth in Attachment "A". 2.2. Additional Services. Additional services, if any, shall only proceed upon written agreement between City and Consultant. The written Agreement shall be in the form of an Amendment to this Agreement. 3.0 CONDUCT OF WORK 3.1 Time of Completion. Consultant shall commence performance of services as required by the Scope-of-Work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete such services within ________________ from receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall complete the work to the City's reasonable satisfaction, even if contract disputes arise or Consultant contends it is entitled to further compensation. 4.0 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 4.1 Basis for Compensation. For the performance of the professional services of this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed maximum dollar amount of $-------. Labor charges shall be based upon hourly billing rates for the various classifications of personnel employed by Page 451 of 585 COU No. ______________ Std – ProfSvcsAgreement- November 20, 2008 PAGE 2 OF 7 Consultant to perform the Scope of Work as set forth in the attached Attachment B, which shall include all indirect costs and expenses of every kind or nature, except direct expenses. The direct expenses and the fees to be charged for same shall be as set forth in Attachment B. Consultant shall complete the Scope of Work for the not-to- exceed guaranteed maximum, even if actual time and expenses exceed that amount. 4.2 Changes. Should changes in compensation be required because of changes to the Scope-of-Work of this Agreement, the parties shall agree in writing to any changes in compensation. "Changes to the Scope-of-Work" means different activities than those described in Attachment "A" and not additional time to complete those activities than the parties anticipated on the date they entered this Agreement. 4.3 Sub-contractor Payment. The use of sub-consultants or other services to perform a portion of the work of this Agreement shall be approved by City prior to commencement of work. The cost of sub-consultants shall be included within guaranteed not-to-exceed amount set forth in Section 4.1. 4.4 Terms of Payment. Payment to Consultant for services rendered in accordance with this contract shall be based upon submission of monthly invoices for the work satisfactorily performed prior to the date of the invoice less any amount already paid to Consultant, which amounts shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after receipt by City. The invoices shall provide a description of each item of work performed, the time expended to perform each task, the fees charged for that task, and the direct expenses incurred and billed for. Invoices shall be accompanied by documentation sufficient to enable City to determine progress made and to support the expenses claimed. 5.0 ASSURANCES OF CONSULTANT 5.1 Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely responsible for its acts or omissions. Consultant (including its agents, servants, and employees) is not the City's agent, employee, or representative for any purpose. It is the express intention of the parties hereto that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee, joint venturer, or partner of City for any purpose whatsoever. City shall have no right to, and shall not control the manner or prescribe the method of accomplishing those services contracted to and performed by Consultant under this Agreement, and the general public and all governmental agencies regulating such activity shall be so informed. Those provisions of this Agreement that reserve ultimate authority in City have been inserted solely to achieve compliance with federal and state laws, rules, regulations, and interpretations thereof. No such provisions and no other provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between Consultant and City. Consultant shall pay all estimated and actual federal and state income and self- employment taxes that are due the state and federal government and shall furnish and pay worker's compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and any other benefits required by law for himself and his employees, if any. Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold City and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any claims or demands by federal, state or local government agencies for any such taxes or benefits due but not paid by Consultant, including the legal costs associated with defending against any audit, claim, demand or law suit. Page 452 of 585 COU No. ______________ Std – ProfSvcsAgreement- November 20, 2008 PAGE 3 OF 7 Consultant warrants and represents that it is a properly licensed professional or professional organization with a substantial investment in its business and that it maintains its own offices and staff which it will use in performing under this Agreement. 5.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibility is solely to City. Consultant has no interest and will not acquire any direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall not in the performance of this Agreement employ a person having such an interest. If the City Manager determines that the Consultant has a disclosure obligation under the City’s local conflict of interest code, the Consultant shall file the required disclosure form with the City Clerk within 10 days of being notified of the City Manager’s determination. 6.0 INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Insurance Liability. Without limiting Consultant's obligations arising under Paragraph 6.2 Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it procures and maintains for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with its performance under this Agreement. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Insurance Services Office ("ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form No. CG 20 10 10 01 and Commercial General Liability Coverage – Completed Operations Form No. CG 20 37 10 01. 2. ISO Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 "any auto" or Code 8, 9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025. 3. Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. 4. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant’s profession. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability. B. Minimum Limits of Insurance Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage including operations, products and completed operations. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work performed under this Agreement, or the aggregate limit shall be twice the prescribed per occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Page 453 of 585 COU No. ______________ Std – ProfSvcsAgreement- November 20, 2008 PAGE 4 OF 7 3. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker's compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 4. Errors and Omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. D. Other Insurance Provisions The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages a. The City, it officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects; liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, hired or borrowed by the Consultant for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope-of-protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. b. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. d. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 2. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from Consultant's performance of the work, pursuant to this Agreement. Page 454 of 585 COU No. ______________ Std – ProfSvcsAgreement- November 20, 2008 PAGE 5 OF 7 3. Professional Liability Coverage If written on a claims-made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the effective date of this Agreement. The policy period shall extend from ------ to ------------. 4. All Coverages Each Insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. E. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with admitted California insurers with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- for financial strength, AA for long-term credit rating and AMB-1 for short-term credit rating. F. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish the City with Certificates of Insurance and with original Endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates and Endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The Certificates and Endorsements are to be on forms provided or approved by the City. Where by statute, the City's Workers' Compensation - related forms cannot be used, equivalent forms approved by the Insurance Commissioner are to be substituted. All Certificates and Endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before Consultant begins the work of this Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. If Consultant fails to provide the coverages required herein, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or all of them. In that event, the cost of insurance becomes part of the compensation due the contractor after notice to Consultant that City has paid the premium. G. Subcontractors Consultant shall include all subcontractors or sub-consultants as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each sub- contractor or sub-consultant. All coverage for sub-contractors or sub-consultants shall be subject to all insurance requirements set forth in this Paragraph 6.1. 6.2 Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition thereto, Consultant agrees, for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement, to indemnify the City for any claim, cost or liability that arises out of, or pertains to, or relates to any negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of services under this contract by Consultant, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful Page 455 of 585 COU No. ______________ Std – ProfSvcsAgreement- November 20, 2008 PAGE 6 OF 7 misconduct or defects in design by the City, or arising from the active negligence of the City. “Indemnify,” as used herein includes the expenses of defending against a claim and the payment of any settlement or judgment arising out of the claim. Defense costs include all costs associated with defending the claim, including, but not limited to, the fees of attorneys, investigators, consultants, experts and expert witnesses, and litigation expenses. References in this paragraph to City or Consultant, include their officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors. 7.0 CONTRACT PROVISIONS 7.1 Ownership of Work. All documents furnished to Consultant by City and all documents or reports and supportive data prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are owned and become the property of the City upon their creation and shall be given to City immediately upon demand and at the completion of Consultant's services at no additional cost to City. Deliverables are identified in the Scope-of-Work, Attachment "A". All documents produced by Consultant shall be furnished to City in digital format and hardcopy. Consultant shall produce the digital format, using software and media approved by City. 7.2 Governing Law. Consultant shall comply with the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, and all local governments having jurisdiction over this Agreement. The interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by California law and any action arising under or in connection with this Agreement must be filed in a Court of competent jurisdiction in Mendocino County. 7.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement plus its Attachment(s) and executed Amendments set forth the entire understanding between the parties. 7.4 Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect. 7.5 Modification. No modification of this Agreement is valid unless made with the agreement of both parties in writing. 7.6 Assignment. Consultant's services are considered unique and personal. Consultant shall not assign, transfer, or sub-contract its interest or obligation under all or any portion of this Agreement without City's prior written consent. 7.7 Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant, term or condition or a waiver of the covenant, term or condition itself. 7.8 Termination. This Agreement may only be terminated by either party: 1) for breach of the Agreement; 2) because funds are no longer available to pay Consultant for services provided under this Agreement; or 3) City has abandoned and does not wish to complete the project for which Consultant was retained. A party shall notify the other party of any alleged breach of the Agreement and of the action required to cure the breach. If the breaching party fails to cure the breach within the time specified in the notice, the contract shall be terminated as of that time. If terminated for lack of funds or Page 456 of 585 COU No. ______________ Std – ProfSvcsAgreement- November 20, 2008 PAGE 7 OF 7 abandonment of the project, the contract shall terminate on the date notice of termination is given to Consultant. City shall pay the Consultant only for services performed and expenses incurred as of the effective termination date. In such event, as a condition to payment, Consultant shall provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder, subject to off-set for any direct or consequential damages City may incur as a result of Consultant's breach of contract. 7.9 Execution of Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each bearing the original signature of the parties. Alternatively, this Agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission, and in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. When executed using either alternative, the executed agreement shall be deemed an original admissible as evidence in any administrative or judicial proceeding to prove the terms and content of this Agreement. 8.0 NOTICES Any notice given under this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered or deposited in the mail (certified or registered) addressed to the parties as follows: CITY OF UKIAH -------------- DEPT. OF_____________ -------------- 300 SEMINARY AVENUE -------------- UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 95482-5400 9.0 SIGNATURES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the Effective Date: CONSULTANT BY: __________________________ ____________________ Date PRINT NAME: _________________ __________________ IRS IDN Number CITY OF UKIAH BY: ____________________ Date CITY MANAGER ATTEST ____________________ CITY CLERK Date Page 457 of 585 City of UkiahCity of Ukiah Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2Phase 2 February 4, 2021February 4, 2021 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 458 of 585 This page intentionally left blank Page 459 of 585 Table of Contents 1. Introductory Letter ..................................1 2. Executive Summary .................................3 3. Consultant Information, Qualifications and Experience .......................................5 4. Organization and Approach .................15 Organizational Chart............................................17 Team Biographies ..............................................19 5. Scope of Work .......................................31 6. Schedule of Work ...................................40 7. Conflict of Interest Statement ...............41 8. Litigation .................................................41 9. Professional Services Agreement .........42 10. Federal-Aid Provisions .........................43 11. Cost Proposal ...........(Separately Sealed) Appendix: Resumes ...................................47 P8670 (11222543)-Proposal.indd Page 460 of 585 This page intentionally left blank Page 461 of 585 GHD 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150, Santa Rosa, CA 95407 United StatesT: + 1 707 523 1010 | www.ghd.com 1. I N T R O D U C T O R Y LE T T E R February 4, 2021 Jason Benson Senior Engineer City of Ukiah, Department of Public Works 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482-5400 RE: Proposal for Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project Engineering Design & Right of Way Services - Phase 2 Dear Mr. Benson and Selection Panel Members: GHD is pleased to submit the following Proposal for professional engineering design and right-of-way (ROW) services for the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & and Utilities Project - Phase 2 (“Project”). We are privileged to be part of the transformative Phase 1 project, which marks a significant new chap- ter in the successful evolution of the historic Downtown Ukiah corridor. Like Phase 1, GHD recognizes the Phase 2 Project is much more than a roadway engineering project. It will create the northern and southern gateways into the welcoming heart of Ukiah. This project will continue the growth and revital- ization of Downtown Ukiah and will be the entry to the City core for decades to come. GHD has supported the City on this Project since the planning stages in 2009, assisting with Caltrans coordination, the environmental compliance process and other items. In Phase 1 our role extended be- yond design, right-of-way and construction support, and included environmental and hazardous mate- rials, Caltrans funding support and community outreach support. In Phase 2 we are prepared to con- tinue to support the City as much or as little as needed to overcome challenges and take advantage of the opportunities to develop a welcoming and timeless design and with the right level of community en- gagement. To deliver on this promise we are bringing the same proven team from Phase 1 with some adjustments considering the smaller size of this Phase. From our experience with Phase 1 we under- stand how to address all the complexities and bring the expertise and availability required to successful- ly complete the Project within the City’s schedule. Our team will be led by Project Manager Jeremy Schmal, PE, with senior support from Principal in Charge Matt Kennedy, PE, TE. Jeremy was the Deputy Project Manager under Matt in Phase 1. He was a key design lead and has been very engaged in construction and the uncovering of previously un- known information that can only be discovered once demolition and excavation occur. Jeremy brings the management talents and the core engineering skills required to successfully deliver Phase 2 and in- tegrate it with the Phase 1 improvements. We have included mostly the same team of subconsultants from Phase 1, including WRT for the land- scape and streetscape design, Cinquini & Passarino, Inc. for land surveying, and AR/WS for right-of- way. GHD will perform all other civil, stormwater, utility and traffic engineering on the project. We have al- so included CHS, a certified DBE, to provide an independent validation of the corridor traffic operations to confirm lane geometry, queuing and operations. While not specifically requested by the City, we have identified other optional or recommended services, which can be implemented as needed, including Page 462 of 585 GHD 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150, Santa Rosa, CA 95407 United StatesT: + 1 707 523 1010 | www.ghd.com 1. I N T R O D U C T O R Y LE T T E R geotechnical engineering, hazardous materials assessment, and utility potholing. Our goal with a broad service offering is to have the capability to address all potential pitfalls and provide the City with options to make the most informed decisions for the best outcome possible. This is a truly unique Project that the entire GHD Team is excited to continue to work with the City on this important project. Our proposal describes our team, experience, individual and collective qualifications. We also describe our technical approach to the Project, and how we will provide an integrated utility design, address the pavement rehabilitation, and engage with the City early in a design workshop to develop feasible con- cepts that achieve the City’s goals. Our Team is experienced, truly committed and excited at the oppor- tunity to continue working with the City on this transformational Downtown improvement project. Sincerely, GHD Matt Kennedy, PE, TE, Principal Jeremy Schmal, PE, Project Manager 1 707 540 9687 | matt.kennedy@ghd.com 1 707 540 9612 | jeremy.schmal@ghd.com P.S. Matt Kennedy is a principal of the firm and is authorized to negotiate and contractually bind the company. Page 463 of 585 2. E X E C U T I V E SU M M A R Y GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 3 Executive Summary2. GHD has assembled the ideal Team for the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet and Utilities Project Phase 2. In addition to our extensive qualifi- cations on similar projects, including Phase 1, as a long-time partner of the City, we are truly commit- ted to helping the City deliver the next phase of this high-profile Capital Improvement Project. To illustrate this commitment, our Team has already started on planning and preliminary design with drone flights, urban design renderings, property owner research, and a contamination search. Understanding the im- portant nature of the project and the City’s commit- ment to revitalizing the downtown State Street corri- dor, we have established an approach will enable the City to achieve its goals. The following are unique values GHD brings to the City and are highlights in our proposal: • Same team that delivered the Phase 1 project on-time allowing the City to secure the funding and stay on budget. • Unmatched downtown road diet expertise along the former Highway 101 corridor. • Proven team on the delivery of comparable northern California downtown/phased corridors. • Expertise in CTC and Caltrans Local Assistance processing • Committed team • Extensive resources and internal expertise for the project size, scope diversity, and schedule • Innovative solutions (Permits to Enter, HAZMAT Pre-Assessment, Parallel Efforts, stormwater management) Qualifications and Experience The project requires a thoughtful approach and a team with an outstanding track-record and ex- pertise in the delivery of complete street/road di- et projects - including within downtowns and city corridors. Complete Streets, Green Streets, Smart Streets, Road Diets, or by any other name, GHD has provided municipal roadway solutions and revi- talization projects for communities across Northern California and is ready to apply that expertise on the Ukiah Downtown Project. Our extensive experi- ence of planning and design provides a “real world” perspective when determining the optimal improve- ments for your community and adjacent owners. GHD is hopeful that, through our proposal and ex- tensive qualifications, we illustrate our ability to pro- vide the City with the most highly qualified team for this Project. Organization and Approach With over 90 years in business and over 70 years in northern California, GHD brings the strength and stability of 10,000 staff across the globe with a local presence. With eight offices in Northern California and over 400 staff in the west, GHD has the resourc- es and expertise to see the project through from de- sign through construction. GHD is excited to bring the same Team that deliv- ered Phase 1 to the City, and to continue the part- nership we formed into Phase 2. The composition of the key GHD Team members and their roles: GHD - Prime, PM, Civil, Traffic, Environmental, Electrical, Structural, Utilities, CTC/CT Processing; CHS - Traffic Advisory and Traffic QA/QC; WRT - Landscape Architecture, Irrigation, Outreach Materials; AR/WS - Right-of-Way (ROW) Consulting; C&P - Topography Survey, ROW Survey, ROW Legals. This is an established Team - members of this Team have worked together for over 15 years, including the delivery of multiple similar downtown projects. Our team will be led by a proven, dual-licensed PE/TE Principal-in-Charge, Matt Kennedy and Project Manager, Jeremy Schmal, PE, who both have recently completed relevant road projects for the City that have included pedestrian improve- ments, utilities, traffic signals, LID and other com- mon elements. Our project management approach includes early stakeholder meetings, outreach to adjacent proper- ty owners, and continual communication across the Cloverdale Boulevard Streetscape, City of Cloverdale Page 464 of 585 4 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 2. E X E C U T I V E SU M M A R Y Team and with the City. We will hold regular meet- ings to review key elements of the project and to keep the critical path in view at all times. Scope of Work (and Technical Approach) GHD’s Team has delivered multiple projects similar to the Ukiah Downtown Project, namely the City’s Downtown Streetscape Phase 1. Through this ex- perience, we have developed a comprehensive, de- tailed scope of work to deliver this high-profile proj- ect on time. We have established a list of the mile- stone deliverables to ensure a coordinated project delivery. Visualizing the transformation: The improvements to these segments of State Street will continue the transformation of Ukiah’s Downtown. Our Team has already flown the corridor with a drone and created a birds-eye visualization. Continuing the streetscape design process, widened sidewalks, lane reductions, new street trees, high-visibility crosswalks, deco- rative paving, and corner seating in bulb-outs are shown. The project team will utilize the lessons learned during the design of Phase 1 to immediately hit the ground running on the project. After the kick-off, we are excited to explore different design elements that can be incorporated into Phase 2 that may not have fit in Phase 1, but also to continue the designs vet- ted as part of the Phase 1 project. These design el- ements include asphalt stamped/colored paving, unique LID stormwater treatment areas, pedestri- an-scaled decorative streetlights, identity features, raised medians, and expanded architectural features. We will prepare additional graphics to communicate the design ideas for use in public outreach efforts. We propose to hold an initial scoping meeting with the City to review opportunities to reduce the cost of the project and shorten the schedule. For exam- ple, we would consider the use of “Permits to Enter” as an alternative to conventional TCEs as was do- ne during Phase 1. Our right of way consultant, AR/ WS secured approval early from Caltrans Local Assistance and was able to save substantial time and money securing the right to construct the conforms on private land. Other anticipated technical challeng- es are similar to Phase 1 and the team will evaluate the solutions used in that project to determine if the challenges can be overcome with similar improve- ments. Our approach is to formulate and discuss in- novative ideas to each problem as early as possible and partner with the City to arrive at solutions that address as many concerns as possible without com- promising on the City’s goal for welcoming northern and southern entries into the downtown area. Schedule, COI, Litigation, PSA, Federal Aid GHD will initiate the project and advance work as quickly as possible to keep the project schedule and milestone deadlines on track. GHD does not have a conflict of interest for the proj- ect. Additionally, GHD has worked with the City on numerous projects and is confident that we can agree to terms on project contracting. GHD has pro- vided all the requested Federal forms in the RFP; we propose to review other Federal forms that may be required with the City. We also included expertise in federal funding requirements and grants manage- ment assistance should the City have this need. Team Commitment GHD is thankful to the City of Ukiah for this oppor- tunity and extends our Team’s highest commitment to the delivery of this exciting project. Though ap- proach and qualifications are paramount to the proj- ect, we recognize that commitment is the intangible component that drives a successful project. Visualizing the Transformation Downtown Streetscape Project - Phase 1 Construction, City of Ukiah Page 465 of 585 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 5 and experience of our people with innovative prac- tices, technical capabilities, and robust systems to create lasting community benefits. Transportation Services GHD has an excellent performance record with municipal and government agencies throughout California. Many of GHD’s past and current projects include the following transportation services: • Traffic Planning and Engineering • Motorized and Non-Motorized Transportation • Planning/Design • Complete Streets/Streetscape Design • Civil Engineering • Storm Drainage and LID Design • Landscape Architecture/Wayfinding • Roundabout Planning/Design • Construction Management • Land/Construction Surveying • Public Outreach & Interagency Coordination About GHD GHD provides transportation planning and engineer- ing, environmental, advisory, digital, and construc- tion services to private and public sector clients. Operating globally and delivering services locally, we are able to offer clients the ability to develop a work- ing relationship with our local staff while having access to our global experience base. Put simply, we work where our clients work. Our business model is to work inter- nationally and deliver locally. Firm Information Established in 1928, GHD is a wholly-owned subsid- iary - a privately held international engineering and environmental services firm owned by our people and operating across five continents. We are one of the world’s leading professional services companies operating in the global markets of: Our people offer decades of knowledge, as well as a deep understanding of the challenges facing busi- nesses and communities today. We deliver projects with high standards of safety, quality, and ethics across the entire asset value chain. Driven by a client service-led culture, we connect the knowledge, skill, Water | Energy & Resources | Environment | Property & Buildings | Transportation About GHD Address: 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150, Santa Rosa, CA 95407, United States Contact: Jeremy Schmal, PE, 1 707 540 9612, jeremy.schmal@ghd.com Year Established: 1928 Organization Type: Corporation Size Variation over Five Years: California Staff: 2016 (293), 2017 (353), 2018 (393), 2019 (393), 2020 (400+) Consultant Information, Qualifications & Experience3. North America: 130 offices 4,000 people Offices Worldwide: 200+ US West: 16 offices 400+ people Global Markets: 5 Providing engineering, environmental digital and construction services Employee- Owned Corporation At-a-Glance 1 connected global network $1.6B FY 2019 annual revenue USD People Globally: 10,000 Years in Business: 92 Jaguar Way/Windsor Road Pedestrian & Bicycle Improvements, Town of Windsor Page 466 of 585 6 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E Committed to You GHD is dedicated to understanding and helping the City of Ukiah achieve its goals on this project. We are com- mitted to sustainable development, safety, and innovation. We care for the well-be- ing of our people, assist communities in need, and conduct business in an ethical and environmental- ly responsible manner. We also offer our clients the confidence and peace of mind of quality and perfor- mance that comes from the fact that GHD is ranked 26th in the top 500 design firms by Engineering News-Record in 2020. Repeat Business The cornerstone of our business is our client-centered culture and teamwork-based approach known as “One GHD”. We are proud of our long tradition of repeat, local government clients. A full 90% of our clients are municipal agencies or government entities, and 75% of our work comes from repeat cli- ents. We believe this illustrates not only our knowledge of specialized engineering disciplines, but also our willingness to listen and respond to individual client needs. Each of our project managers is an advocate for his or her client throughout the design, permitting, and con- struction process. Continuity of Personnel We are committed to keeping the same project team we are proposing. Should an unexpected change result in a team member being unavailable to serve the City of Ukiah on this project, we are backed with the resources of a global network. No changes will be made to the project team without consent by the City of Ukiah. Working with the City of Ukiah GHD has been working with the City of Ukiah for de- cades, primarily in the context of transportation and utility improvement projects including the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet and Utilities Project - Phase 1. We have also completed countless standalone utility replacement and roadway reconstruction proj- ects. Through the years project have included san- itary sewer master plans and updates, storm drain area plans, FEMA Letter of Map Revisions along Doolan Creek (within the project limits) and a wide variety of other multidisciplinary work. Specific proj- ects include: • Redwood Business Park Transportation Improvements • Talmage Interchange Roundabout Conceptual Designs • Perkins Street and Orchard Avenue Intersection Improvements • Replacement Well #4 and New Well #9 Project • Ukiah Rail with Trail (Great Redwood Trail), Phases 1 -3 • Orchard Avenue Bridge Replacement • Bridges over Gobbi Street and Babcock Lane Additionally, GHD has completed numerous projects for Mendocino County in and around Ukiah, further- ing our understanding of both the region and the re- lationships therein between municipal and regional agencies and entities: • Rail-with-Trail Corridor Plan | Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG) • Single Route | Mendocino County DOT • Hill Road Bridge | Mendocino County DOT • Comptche Road Slide | Mendocino County DOT • Mendocino County Courthouse Infrastructure Project Phases 1, 2, and 3 | Mendocino County • Transit Operations and Maintenance Facility | Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA) This regional experience coupled with our first-hand, extensive knowledge of the project from inception through Phase 1, enables GHD to provide the City of Ukiah with unparalleled service - balancing budget, schedule, and the City’s goals - for Phase 2 of the Downtown Streetscape & Utilities project. M u n i c i p al Age n c i e s & Gov e r n m ents R epeat C li e nts Redwood Business Park Transportation Improvements, City of Ukiah Page 467 of 585 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 7 The Right Team For over 60 years, GHD has been active in the de- sign and development of numerous high-visibility fast-track CIP projects in Northern California. We are a recognized leader in the design of multi-discipline infrastructure projects. Sensitive to community and agency concerns, we offer strong project manage- ment to keep projects on schedule and within bud- get. GHD’s “total project” expertise and service-ori- ented approach will be vital to the team-oriented ap- proach to this project. The projects listed in this section demonstrate the technical capabilities and experience of our proj- ect team’s work similar to the City’s Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet and Utilities Project Phase 2. They illustrate our ability to address complex issues and demonstrate our history of working as a collab- orative team. Client references are included within the detailed project descriptions and on page 13. GHD has completed over 50 streetscape improve- ment projects across California. In particular, GHD has successfully delivered numerous similar former Caltrans-funded corridor redevelopments and revi- talization projects. This specific expertise affords us a unique understanding of the inherent design and management elements in a project of this nature, including potential challenges and opportunities. These challenges and opportunities have led GHD to develop various innovative solutions and resulted in improved project outcomes. While straightforward in concept, we recognize that this project is complex at the management, detailed design, and construction levels. We have done it successfully for the City before, and have an estab- lished and proven project approach that proactively address project issues before they become prob- lematic, infuses innovative solutions, and helps lead the City to successful project delivery. GHD’s projects performed in California, summarize the depth and breadth of our relevant experience. Collectively, our extensive state-wide experience, united with a local team, provides the City with the assurance that the final project will, most important- ly, be designed appropriately to promote safety and functionality, but will also be designed to reflect and enhance the City’s unique character. GHD has selected the six most relevant projects de- livered in the last five years upon which to expand. As described above, these projects include simi- lar elements and services to those which the City is seeking. Page 468 of 585 8 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E City of Willits Main Street Road Diet Project Objective Willits is one of many small, charming cities in the forested Northern California County of Mendocino. Until recently, it was bisected by US 101 - one of the most heavily-traveled roads in the area. It has long been both lifeblood, bringing summer tourists and conduit for the daily transport of goods statewide, and a scourge - a source of massive congestion and safety concerns. As a state-owned and operated highway, it had been difficult to truly transform the City’s main artery into a thread that binds the community together. With the completion of a highway bypass in November 2016, this dynamic changed; the City and its people could guide Main Street’s future. Project Description Working with Caltrans in preparation for the opening of the bypass and the transfer of this three-mile segment of road, the City hired WRT to lead the redesign of this now local thoroughfare - from state highway to the center of community life. Now, unburdened of regional traffic and under the jurisdiction of the City, it was important to employ a robust community outreach effort to ensure that Main Street became exactly what the people of Willits needed and wanted. The cornerstone of the process was a week-long community charrette anchored by a series of meetings with stakeholders, emergency responders, and the public. Provided with a downtown store front as a base of operations, WRT staff and transportation and engineering team members drew inspiration from the historic downtown masonry buildings, stories from long-time residents, and the creeks coursing from the surrounding hills crossing Main Street at bridges. As part of the WRT team, Bill Silva served as GHD's Project Principal, and Matt Wargula served as the Coordinator with Caltrans. Project Outcome The Main Street Willits Corridor Plan - which addresses topics including traffic calming, pedestrian safety, street trees, and community gateways - was unanimously approved by City Council on December 6, 2016. The project was completed on time and within budget, and GHD's final fees were below budget. Relevancies include: • Federally-funded • Road diet • Pavement rehabilitation • Pedestrian enhancements • Extensive Caltrans coordination Contracting Agency City of Willits Contracting Agency Project Manager/Contact Dusty Duly, City Planner, 1 707 459 4601, dduley@cityofwillits.org Contract Amount $75,000 Funding Source Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant, City Local Matching Funds Date of Contract 2016 Date of Completion 2016 Consultant Project Manager & Contact John Gibbs, Principal (WRT), 1 415 229 2806, jgibbs@wrtdesign.com/Bill Silva, Principal (GHD), 1 707 523 1010, bill.silva@ghd.com • Bike lanes • Local Downtown and former Highway 101 • Public outreach • GHD teamed with WRT Page 469 of 585 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 9 Ukiah Downtown Streetscape and Road Diet Project Objective The Downtown Streetscape and Road Diet project included the design of new streetscape and utility improvements along State Street from Mill Street to Henry Street, approximately 9 city blocks. The project also includes improvements on Perkins Street and Standley Street from School Street to Main Street. The intent of the road diet improvements was to transform the existing four-lane State Street cross section into a three-lane cross section with one travel lane in each direction and a two-way left-turn (TWLT) lane in the center and parallel parking on both sides of the street. The TWLT lanes would transition to left turn pockets at intersections. Project Description Specific components of the project included sidewalk- widening and construction of curb ramps and bulb outs for ADA compliance and pedestrian safety, relocation of drain inlets and pipes, construction of Low Impact Development (LID) storm water enhancement features, installation of new streetlights, and installation of street furniture. New traffic control signals will be installed at Mill Street, Perkins Street and Standley Street. Sidewalk improvements, ranging from 8 feet to 15 feet, were designed to ADA accessible standards and included bulb-outs with RRFBs and stamped asphalt at each street intersection, intended to enhance pedestrian safety. New sidewalks, driveways and ramp improvements conform to existing private improvements at the public right of way or building faces. The widened sidewalks include new planter areas, street trees, tree grates, street furnishings (benches, recycling and trash containers, bicycle racks, signage, bollards, streetlights etc.). Along Perkins Street and Standley Street, outdoor restaurant/café seating have been enhanced with the widening of sidewalks. The road diet portion was designed to maintain and enhance the State Street corridor vehicular capacity, reduce intersection congestion by providing center turn pockets that allow left turning vehicles to move out of the main flow of traffic, enhance pedestrian visibility and safety, and provide space for streetscape and pedestrian improvements. Utility improvements on State Street included approximately 2,700 lineal feet of new, 8-inch PVC sanitary sewer line, complete with new manholes, service laterals and cleanouts, and approximately 2,700 lineal feet of new 12-inch PVC water main line, complete with new water valves, fire hydrants, and water service lines with meter boxes. Project Outcome The project is currently under construction with an anticipated completion date of June 2021. Contracting Agency City of Ukiah Contracting Agency Project Manager/Contact Tim Eriksen, Director and City Engineer, 1 707 463 6280, teriksen@cityofukiah.com Contract Amount $1.2 million Funding Source Federal, State, and Local Funds Date of Contract 2019 Date of Completion June 2021 (est.) Consultant Project Manager & Contact Matt Kennedy, 1 707 540 9687, matt.kennedy@ghd.com Page 470 of 585 10 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E East Broadway Road Complete Street Project Objective The Broadway Corridor is the first and largest infrastructure project from Measure A funds and will include improved and widened sidewalks, new pavement, increased public real estate at intersections, bike lanes, and a road reconfiguration that will slow down vehicles in what business owners and residents alike have described as a “speedway” for drivers desperate to connect to Downtown or access the 710 further west. Project Description GHD was selected to redevelop a 2 mile segment of East Broadway in the city of Long Beach, CA, to create a multi-modal street that will improve overall mobility and the quality of life for residents in the area. The segment starts just east of downtown at Alamitos Avenue and goes east through Alamitos Beach to Bluff Park, ending at Redondo Avenue. In the before project conditions, East Broadway is a 4-lane undivided roadway without any left-turn lanes between Alamitos Avenue and Molino Avenue and a 2-lane roadway with two-way left turn lane between Molino Avenue and Redondo Avenue. The project converts the segment to a 2-lane roadway with left-turn lanes at each signalized intersection, cycle tracks (on-street bicycle lanes separated from through traffic by parallel parking and a buffered area), and side boarding island transit stops (in-street raised refuge islands dedicated to waiting and boarding areas for transit passengers enabling in-lane transit stops and improved accessibility and removing transit vehicle/ bicycle conflict). This redesign creates a “complete street” that will be safe and accessible. The project also addresses non-compliant ADA facilities and a steep roadway cross-slope due to abandoned/buried railroad tracks and existing development throughout the segment. Some of the challenges that the team overcame on this project included: transit facilities location, public outreach, steep driveways, pavement design, coordination with multiple agencies, improve roadway profile, and ADA compliance. Project Outcome The design phase was completed within schedule and the project is projected to be completed by April 2019. The City of Long Beach is very pleased with GHD’s performance on this project. Relevancies include: • Federally-funded • Downtown • Road diet • Complete street • Separated bikeway • Public outreach Contracting Agency City of Long Beach Contracting Agency Project Manager/Contact Onofre Ramirez, Senior Engineer, 1 562 570 6183, onofre.ramirez@longbeach.gov Contract Amount $410,000 Funding Source Measure A Funds Date of Contract 2017 Date of Completion 2019 Consultant Project Manager & Contact Myung Choo, 1 949 585 5225, myung.choo@ghd.com Page 471 of 585 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 11 The roundabouts will reduce the four-lane facilities to two lanes and close gaps in existing bicycle facilities by providing Class II bicycle lanes and shared-use paths. The drainage improvements for the project include mitigating the 150-year event and decreasing flood risks in areas near the roundabout intersections. GHD provided stormwater quality Low Impact Development (LID) design and flood mitigation via a detention basin to reduce the flooding impacts and enhance water quality treatment to the maximum extent practicable, while reusing existing infrastructure. Project Outcome The solution was the installation of roundabouts along three streets, which provide the capacity to handle the existing and future traffic, while reducing the number of through lanes from four to two. This allowed for room to accommodate bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles all with minimal right of way impacts. Relevancies include: • Federally-funded • Downtown • Road diet • Complete street La Quinta Village, a Road Diet Project Project Objective La Quinta was seeking to improve their pedestrian and bicycle safety with the use of roundabouts. The goal was to transform three heavily vehicle-dominated corridors with three parks, an elementary school, and other destinations into pedestrian, bicycle, and neighborhood electric vehicle-friendly complete streets with five roundabouts. Project Description GHD assisted the City in preparing the Cycle 3 ATP Grant application by providing the conceptual design, preliminary costs estimates, cost/benefit analysis, and assisting with the preparation of various narrative responses. Being awarded funds through the ATP grant program, the City hired GHD to perform the work to bring the complete street to design and completion. The project will provide three complete street corridors that include five roundabouts, a road diet that reduced travel lanes to provide bicycle lanes, and various pedestrian crossing improvements. • Roundabouts • Bike lanes • Pedestrian enhancements Contracting Agency City of La Quinta Contracting Agency Project Manager/Conact Bryan McKinney, City Engineer, 1 760 777 7045, bmckinney@laquintaca.gov Contract Amount $1.3 million Funding Source Active Transportation Program Grant Date of Contract 2017 Date of Completion In Construction Consultant Project Manager & Contact Lindsey VanParys, 1 425 563 6500, lindsey.vanparys@ghd.com Page 472 of 585 12 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E construction activities with Caltrans District 1, PG&E, Comcast, AT&T, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and other stakeholders. GHD also prepared all of the traffic analyses and traffic impact studies for the project environmental documents. This effort included developing and analyzing four different alignment and intersection alternatives for the Talmage Road Interchange improvements. Project Outcome A key challenge overcome by the project was to develop a cost-effective and feasible method to accommodate existing shallow utilities while still achieving the design Traffic Index. GHD worked closely with subgrade and pavement fabric manufactures to design a pavement section of reduced thickness compared with a traditional design that improved bearing capacity while also increasing the design life of the pavement. To improve pavement tensile strength and longevity the project used a high strength aramid fiber reinforcement (Kevlar® type fibers) in the hot mix asphalt mix design. Relevancies include: • Caltrans coordination • Adjacent to the Hwy 101 Interchange project • Pedestrian enhancements The project was recently recognized by the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), receiving the “Public Works Project of the Year” by the ACEC North Coast Chapter, and an Honor Award in the ACEC California 2019 Engineering Excellence Awards. Redwood Business Park Transportation Improvements & Talmage Road Interchange Project Objective The objective of this project was to improve roadways and storm water quality in the Redwood Business Park commercial business and retail area of the City. Project Description GHD was the Engineer of Record for this $7.1 million project to improve roadways and stormwater quality in the Redwood Business Park commercial business and retail area of the City. The project was required to allow for the planned development of the business park and the CEQA requirement to improve the roadways and intersections that serve the area before allowing further commercial development. It also involved the design of geometric modifications to the existing freeway interchange at US 101 and SR 222 (Talmage Road) in Ukiah. GHD provided overall project management, design engineering, environmental compliance assistance, and construction management. GHD coordinated ACEC North Coast Chapter 2018 “Public Works Project of the Year” ACEC California 2019 Engineering Excellence Award Contracting Agency City of Ukiah Contracting Agency Project Manager/Contact Tim Eriksen, City Engineer, 1 707 463 6280, teriksen@cityofukiah.com Contract Amount $761,423 Funding Source California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank) Date of Contract 2010 Date of Completion 2018 Consultant Project Manager & Contact Matt Kennedy, 1 707 540 9687, matt.kennedy@ghd.com Page 473 of 585 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 13 materials, street furnishings, unified signage, water features, and pedestrian crosswalks. the project included acquisition of a parcel and building demolition. Project permitting included RWQCB, NOAA, NMFS, Fish & Wildlife, among others. The project included the narrowing of Healdsburg Avenue (from two to one lane in each direction), widening of sidewalks, extensive landscaping, street furniture, and installation of parking along the Avenue. A vital part of the design process included working with the residents, downtown property owners, and merchants through an extensive outreach and education process to vet urban design components, landscape palettes, and construction-sequencing plan to ensure the appropriate design and continued access to the businesses in the project area. Project Outcome The existing, signalized five-way was reconstructed as a single-lane roundabout to improve safety, capabity and the community's image. An abandoned gas station was acquired and demolished, and disruptions to nearby businesses and the flow of traffic were avoided for this highly visited tourist destination. Relevancies include: • Road diet • Downtown/former Highway 101 • Public outreach • Pedestrian enhancements • GHD with AR/WS on the team Healdsburg Avenue and Five-Way Roundabout Project Objective Located south of the downtown business area and historic square, this comprehensive gateway, streetscape, and utility improvement project is envisioned to set the stage for redevelopment in Healdsburg. Project Description The Healdsburg Avenue and Five-Way Roundabout Improvements project was approximately 1,250 feet long and was a comprehensive gateway, streetscape, railroad crossing, utility undergrounding, and utility improvement project. The corridor improvements set the stage for area redevelopment, corridor efficiency, and enhanced safety. Key design features included the Foss Creek Improvement Area, Overhead Utility Undergrounding Rule 20, underground utilities rehabilitation and extension, roadway corridor design, and the five-way roundabout design. Design features in the pedestrian realm included the addition of landscape planters utilizing native Contracting Agency City of Healdsburg Contracting Agency Project Manager/Contact Brent Salmi, Former City of Healdsburg Public Works Director, 1 925 323 0020, bsalmi@outlook.com Contract Amount $1,525,070 Funding Source City of Healdsburg Redevelopment Funds Date of Contract 2015 Date of Completion 2018 Consultant Project Manager & Contact Bill Silva, 1 707 540 9014, bill.silva@ghd.com Page 474 of 585 14 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 3. C O N S U L T A N T IN F O R M A T I O N , Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S & E X P E R I E N C E Additional References The following are agency references GHD is currently or has previously consulted for in the past three years. City of Rohnert Park Mary Grace Pawson Public Works Director 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, CA 94928 1 707 588 2234 City of Sonoma Colleen Ferguson Public Works Director/City Engineer Public Works Corporation Yard 19728 Eighth Street East Sonoma, CA 95476 1 707 933 2230 City of Healdsburg Brent Salmi, PE Former Public Works Director 435 Allan Court Healdsburg, CA 95448 1 925 323 0020 Town of Windsor Alejandro Perez, PE Senior Civil Engineer, Public Works Department 9291 Old Redwood Hwy # 300A Windsor, CA 95492 1 707 838 5318 Page 475 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 15 Organization and Approach4. Project Background The City of Ukiah has been working towards com- pleting the revitalization of State Street for de- cades. Many of the components of the Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet and Utilities Projects (both Phase 1 and Phase 2) were identified in the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvements Plan Final Report, dated July 1, 2009. This report was the culmination of a shared vision in many stakehold- er meetings and public workshops. Along with the traffic analysis to support the vision the report laying out the framework for the Streetscape Projects was published. In 2019, the City selected GHD to deliver Phase 1 of the project, which included improvements from Mill Street to Henry Street, and also Perkins Street and Standley Street from State Street to School Street. This first phase was the “downtown core” where a majority of the shops and restaurants are located. Phase 1 is currently in construction, with GHD serving to supplement the City’s Construction Management team. Phase 2 of the project includes the sections of State Street that bookend Phase 1 and will complete the entry gateways into the downtown core. Due to environmental and funding constraints the utility portion of Phase 1 was broken out as a sepa- rate project and bid separately from the streetscape and road diet, which created additional challenges. Fortunately, Phase 2 will combine all of the improve- ments into one comprehensive set, adding efficiency to the design and construction of the project. Phase 2 presents many of the same challenges and constraints as phase 1 but has a less aggressive schedule and the benefit of the lessons learned by the team during Phase 1. As expanded on in this section of our proposal, the GHD team is prepared to take those lessons and deliver a quality project while leveraging our experience to streamline the schedule and project budget. Roles and Team Organization GHD has assembled a talented team with an em- phasis on demonstrated technical ability and proven track-record. Our core team has worked together developing and delivering downtown improvement plans, complete streets/road diets and corridor solu- tions for numerous Northern California destination locations, including similar cities in Mendocino and Sonoma Counties where Highway 101 once ran through their downtowns. Through this experience, we have developed valu- able skills to efficiently complete complex, high-pro- file projects by integrating seamlessly and operat- ing as an extension of City staff. As illustrated in the Organizational Chart in the upcoming pages, we offer a comprehensive and experienced team and have access to a large network of additional resourc- es to deliver a quality project, within budget, and on schedule to help the City achieve its goal. The Team is streamlined to be responsive and effi- cient, yet dynamic, including technical expertise in planning, urban design, public outreach, civil, traf- fic, low impact development (LID), and utility design, as well as extensive experience with utility provid- ers, City Electrical Department, CEQA/NEPA com- pliance, permitting, hazardous materials (HAZMAT), Caltrans Local Assistance and CTC coordination, and urban core construction. Team Composition GHD staff proposed for this assignment have decades of ex- perience successfully developing concepts for and designing similar downtown corridors and com- plete streets projects. This will provide the City the peace of mind that comes with having the right pro- fessionals with the right experience planning, design- ing, and supporting environmental compliance and public outreach for this project. Within this section, we present our most relevant experience providing planning, public outreach, engineering, environmen- Page 476 of 585 16 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H tal, and delivery services for downtown, streetscape, road diet and roadway improvement projects. GHD’s experience will provide the City with the knowledgeable, comprehensive and thorough de- sign development and public outreach approach based on our established processes and lessons learned. Our combined experience and collaborative history enables us to bring value and innovation to this project. The experience gained in delivering these projects helps to inform our decisions when composing the team in a way to ensure success. Our team will pro- vide the City with knowledgeable, comprehensive and thorough design development and a proven public outreach approach based on our established processes and lessons learned. Our combined ex- perience and collaborative history enables us to bring value and innovation to this project. The GHD team is composed of the same key mem- bers from GHD that delivered the Phase 1 project, as well as the return of WRT, AR/WS and Cinquini and Passarino. The Phase 2 project team also includes the addition of subcontractor CHS into a Traffic role. Not only will CHS bring the technical expertise to help confirm the proposed traffic modifications in the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvements Plan Final Report, but they also bring a fresh, creative per- spective to the project. Staff/Facilities Available GHD has identified key staff that are all available and ready to work on your project, as shown in the or- ganizational chart on the following page. Work will be completed primarily out of the Santa Rosa of- fice, with support out of our Emeryville and Portland offices. Not only does our team bring the requi- site expertise for a complex project such as this, we bring unparalleled composition and resources from our North Bay/North Coast location. GHD will Prime the contract and have the support of four subconsultants (AR/WS, Cinquini & Passarino, WRT, and CHS). With over 75 staff in Santa Rosa, and 420 in California, GHD can meet all of the City’s and proj- ect’s needs. Local Presence GHD’s Santa Rosa office was established in the mid-1980s and is 60 miles from downtown Ukiah. The Santa Rosa office serves as a major multi-dis- ciplinary hub in Northern California. We continue to successfully service the City and other clients in Mendocino County from our Santa Rosa office loca- tion and with support from our offices in Eureka, the Sacramento Valley and the Bay Area. GHD also has staff that live in Ukiah, and we continue to be inte- grated into the Community. Downtown Streetscape Project - Phase 1 Construction, City of Ukiah Page 477 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 17 Organizational Chart The organizational chart below shows the person- nel we have assembled for the City’s Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2. Our team members have been selected based on their familiarity with this project, Phase 1 experience, specialized expertise, as well as availability to com- mit an appropriate amount of time to the project. Many of our team members have worked together on other projects. All staff are committed to stay with the project for the duration of the project. No staffing changes will be made without prior written approval from the City. As we already mentioned, we once again welcome subconsultants AR/WS, Cinquini & Passarino, WRT, and CHS to our team for the expertise its staff brings. Following are brief biographical descriptions of each team member’s experience, as well as the work each team member will accomplish. Quality Assurance/ Quality Control 🔑 Matt Wargula, PE, TE, QSD/QSP, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge 🔑 Matt Kennedy, PE, TE Project Manager 🔑 Jeremy Schmal, PE Engineering Lead🔑 Pat Tortora, PE, LEED AP | GHD Traffic Signals/Signing, Striping/Traffic Engineer🔑 Frank Penry, PE, TE, PTOE | GHD Utility Engineering Lead🔑 Dillon Morra, PE, QSD | GHD LID Design Lead🔑 Kat Harvey, PE, QSD/QSP | GHD NEPA/CEQA Compliance Lead🔑 Brian Bacciarini | GHD Landscape Architecture Lead🔑 Jake Tobias, ASLA | WRT Topographic & Right of Way Survey Lead🔑 Tony Cinquini, PLS | Cinquini & Passarino Right of Way Appraisal/Acquisition Lead🔑 Marc Ceccarelli | AR/WS Traffic Advisory/Traffic QA/QC🔑 Kevin Stankiewicz, PE | CHS Consulting GHD ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Constructability/Construction SequencingTim Dillenburg, QSD/QSP | GHD Hazardous MaterialsRyan Crawford, PG | GHD Civil Engineering & EstimatingRoman Beltran, EIT | GHD Utilities EngineeringBryan Vrba, EIT | GHD Project Coordinator/SchedulerCrystal Prairie | GHD Electrical EngineeringRick Guggiana, EE, LEED AP | GHD SUBCONSULTANT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Landscape ArchitectureJohn Gibbs, ASLA, LEED AP | WRT Urban DesignAtisha Varshney, ASLA | WRT Survey/Utility ResearchMark Andrilla, PLS | Cinquini & Passarino PotholingPeter Sparks | Subtronic 🔑 Key Personnel Page 478 of 585 18 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H Contact: Kevin Stankiewicz, PE, 1 510 707 6347 Address: 1617 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612 Certifications: SBE/DBE #32117 Qualifications/Skills: CHS Consulting Group (CHS) is a multimodal transporta- tion planning and engineering firm with a reputation for creativity, high-level strategic vision and approaches to project delivery, extensive hands-on experience in trans- portation systems and operations, and attention to detail for final designs. CHS is a minority-owned, small, local business with offices in San Francisco, Oakland, San José, and Los Angeles. CHS provides multimodal trans- portation planning and engineering design services. CHS staff has extensive experience in arterial signal optimiza- tion projects that reduced overall congestion and vehicle emissions while improving progression and travel times. As part of the SFMTA Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project, CHS developed a signal timing plan to al- low for signal progression along Van Ness Avenue while at the same time providing signal priority system for BRT ve- hicles. CHS has completed several hundred signal timing and coordination evaluations and is currently assisting the City of Mountain View on signal timing and coordination projects. Subconsultants To strategically augment the strength and efficiency of our team, GHD will be joined by the fol- lowing subconsultants. We have long-term relationships with the firms on this team, and they will bring the most appropriate, qualified staff and experience to your project. Wallace Roberts & Todd Planning & Design Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. Contact: Jake Tobias, ASLA, LEED AP, 1 415 882 7852 Address: 478 Tehama Street, Suite 2B, San Francisco, CA 94103 Qualifications/Skills: Founded in 1963, Wallace Roberts & Todd (WRT) Planning & Design was immediately recognized for its first projects, which represented the two main directions of WRT’s environmental ethos: designing with nature and enriching urbanism. Thus, WRT employs a “Complete Streets Plus (CS+)” approach to street-making that takes the industry accepted notion of complete streets one step farther. They recognize that in addition to providing the full range of mobility options within the street corridor, a num- ber of additional social, cultural, ecological and other sus- tainable functions can also be provided. Contact: Marc Ceccarelli, 1 925 691 8500 Address: 2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Suite 525, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Qualifications/Skills: Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. (AR/WS) is a full-service right of way and real estate consulting firm, and state certified “California Small Business.” AR/WS specializes in project management, right of way estimat- ing, appraisal, acquisition, relocation, and utility relocation coordination services for public infrastructure work. AR/ WS brings significant relevant experience, having worked with GHD and the City of Ukiah on Phase 1 of the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Project. AR/WS ac- quired 71 Permits to Enter and Construct on an expedited basis for Phase 1 of the Project. Additional regional expe- rience includes work for the County of Mendocino on the East Side Potter Valley Road Improvement Project, and extensive experience in Napa and Sonoma Counties. AR/WS has over 20 years of experience working with GHD. Recent projects include City of Ukiah’s Downtown Streetscape Improvement Project, Phase 1; Healdsburg Avenue Streetscape/Road-Diet/Roundabout Project for the City of Healdsburg; and the City of Rohnert Park’s Keiser Avenue Reconstruction Project. Role: Landscape Architecture Lead/Urban Design Role: Right of Way Appraisal/ Acquisition Lead 32 years in business 58 years in business 67 years in business 20 years in business Contact: Tony Cinquini, 1 707 542 6268 Address: 1360 North Dutton Avenue, Suite 150, Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Qualifications/Skills: Established in 1954, Cinquini & Passarino, Inc. (C&P) has a history of stability and reliability providing municipal and private clients with reliable surveying services - from topo- graphic surveys, boundary surveys, right of way surveys, and construction surveys. C&P is a proven leader among land surveying consultants, bringing extensive experience and has worked on many projects with GHD, including the Healdsburg Avenue Improvements and Five-Way Roundabout, and the Keiser Avenue Extension and Roundabout projects. Cinquini & Passarino, Inc. CHS Consulting Group Role: Topographic/Right of Way Survey Lead Role: Traffic Advisory/Traffic QA/QC Page 479 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 19 Team Member Related Experience and Qualifications 14 years of experience 5 years w/GHD Jeremy Schmal, PE | GHD Project Manager Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #87192 As Project Manager, Jeremy will be the primary point of contact for the City. He will be responsible for coordinating the team’s efforts and maintaining adherence to the project schedule, scope, and budget. Jeremy brings 14 years of experience in civil engineering working with the public sector. He has performed project management and project engineer duties on numerous multi-million dollar public works transportation improvement projects including roundabouts, pedestrian improvements and ADA compliance, roadway widening, utility relocation, intersection improvements and traffic signals, and complete street projects. Jeremy also has experience administering projects with federal aid/local assistance funding, traffic engineering, transportation analysis and planning, and high-visibility pedestrian projects. Other experience includes construction management, where he has acted as Resident Engineer and Lead Inspector, as well as providing construction engineering and bid support. Reference: Eric Miller, PE, TE, Principal Engineer, County of Marin, 1 415 473 6354, EMiller@marincounty.org Reference: Mario Landeros, Senior Engineer (retired), City of Healdsburg, 1 707 228 6111, lanmuril@msn.com 17 years of experience 17 years w/GHD Matt Kennedy, PE, TE | GHD Principal-in-Charge Education BS, Civil Engineering; MS, Environmental Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #68304, OR, NV, NM, HI, GU, CNMI; Traffic Engineer, CA #2385; ENV SP; USACE/NAVFAC Design and Construction Quality Control Manager; Caltrans RE Certification; Construction Specifications Institute Construction Documents Technologist Matt is a principal engineer with extensive experience in delivering a wide variety of civil infrastructure projects including water and recycled water, sewer, drainage, traffic/ transportation, buildings and sustainable site development. He is adept in the management and design of multi- disciplinary projects with large teams and numerous stakeholders. Matt has overseen projects that involve planning, environmental compliance, design, permitting and construction management. His experience also includes a wide range of planning, modeling and analysis capabilities, including utility master planning, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, water and wastewater process design, traffic and parking studies and circulation studies, as well as land surveying and construction management. Reference: Matthew Mendonsa, Project Specialist, County of Sonoma, 1 707 565 2552, Matthew.Mendonsa@ sonoma-county.org Reference: Susan McCutchan, Project Manager, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 510 486 4854, semccutchan@lbl.gov Roles of Key Team Members The following individuals have been identified as key team members for the GHD Team. All members of the Team have expertise in their area of practice and/or have extensive experience on similar downtown roadway corridor streetscape projects, including Federally-funded projects in Mendocino and Sonoma Counties. Brief bios and references for each key team member are also provided on the following pages. Full resumes with li- censes and certification, education and detailed project experience for all key team members can be found in the Appendix. Page 480 of 585 20 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H Team Member Related Experience and Qualifications 18 years of experience 14 years w/GHD Matt Wargula, PE, TE, QSD/QSP, LEED AP Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager Education BS, Civil Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #76103; Traffic Engineer, CA #2749; LEED AP, Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner #01146 Matt is the QA/QC lead for traffic/transportation for GHD in the western USA and will be QA/QC manager on this project. He will perform QAQC reviews of the PS&E packages at each milestone of the project. He has experience with the design and construction of a variety of civil infrastructure projects, including geometric design, traffic signals, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, striping and signing plans, pavement reconstruction and rehabilitation, underground utilities and traffic control systems for construction. He regularly manages Caltrans Local Assistance projects and provides QA/QC leadership for the US West Traffic and Transportation team. Reference: Alejandro Perez, Senior Civil Engineer, Town of Windsor Public Works Dept., 1 707 838 5318, aperez@ townofwindsor.com Reference: Colleen Ferguson, Public Works Director/City Engineer, City of Sonoma, 1 707 933 2230, cferguson@ sonomacity.org 25 years of experience 13 years w/GHD Pat Tortora, PE, LEED AP | GHD Engineering Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #80067, OR, WA, ID, GU; LEED AP Pat will provide technical design support in preparing the plan and profile, specifications, and cost estimate. He brings 25 years of experience in providing planning, design, and construction engineering solutions to public and private clients, with an emphasis on civil design in collaboration with multi-disciplinary teams for comprehensive civil and transportation infrastructure projects. For Phase 1 of the City of Ukiah’s Northwestern Pacific Rail Trail project, Pat served as Lead Civil Engineer and has performed key oversight and civil engineering design on trail, pathway, and/or safe routes projects for SMART, the City of Fort Bragg, the City of Rohnert Park, and the City of San Jose. Reference: Benjamin Kageyama, Senior Civil Engineer, City of Healdsburg, 1 707 431 3397, bKageyama@ci.healdsburg.ca.us Reference: Josh Savage, Executive Director of Facilities, Maintenance and Operations, CRPUSD, 1 707 792 4737, josh_savage@crpusd.org 25 years of experience 10 years w/GHD Frank Penry, PE, TE, PTOE | GHD Traffic Signals/Signing, Striping/Traffic Engineer Education BS, Civil Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #62785, OR; Traffic Engineer, CA #2304; Professional Traffic Operations Engineer #1603 Frank will oversee the project’s signals, signing, and striping. He brings 25 years of experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering design. Frank has managed numerous transportation studies and design projects over the years, from small development impact studies to major roadway improvements. He is well-versed in a wide range of traffic engineering design standards and encroachment requirements, traffic signals, roundabouts, traffic calming and streetscapes, construction traffic handling, detour, and control plans for a variety of civil engineering projects. Reference: Alejandro Perez, PE, Senior Civil Engineer, Town of Windsor, 1 707 838 5318, aperez@townofwindsor.com Reference: Wil Buller, PE, TE, PTOE, Traffic/Transportation Engineer, AC Transit - Service & Operations Planning, 1 510 231 5414, wbuller@actransit.org Page 481 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 21 Team Member Related Experience and Qualifications 12 years of experience 1 year w/GHD Dillon Morra, PE, QSD | GHD Utility Engineering Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #79186 Dillon will coordinate utility relocations as needed for water, sewer and storm drain related to transportation improvements and reconstruction of utilities. His project experience ranges from site grading and drainage, erosion and sediment control, sewer, storm water, to water/ waste water system design. Dillon has applied codes and regulations to his work and is familiar with California storm water permits, International Building Code, California Code of Regulations, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7, and ASTM standards. Reference: Randy Marx, Project Manager, California State University, Sacramento - Office of Water Programs, 1 916 278 5295, randy.marx@owp.csus.edu Reference: Susan McCutchan, Project Manager, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 510 486 4854, semccutchan@lbl.gov 10 years of experience 2 years w/GHD Kat Harvey, PE, QSD/QSP | GHD LID Design Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #84798; Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner #25793 Kat will coordinate with the design team to lead the design on LID and storm drain features in a context sensitive way to integrate with the rest of the design. Kat, a licensed engineer and Qualified SWPPP Developer/Practitioner, has 10 years of experience with stormwater and LID design. She also has experience in land development, roadway and pedestrian improvements design, stormwater permitting and design, and SWPPP development. Kat finds innovative solutions for clients to keep up with ever changing regulations, while giving clients confidence that their project will stay on track for schedule and budget. Reference: Chris Catbagan, PE, Associate Engineer, City of Santa Rosa, 1 707 543 4521, ccatbagan@srcity.org Reference: Carl Euphrat, PE, Senior Civil Engineer, Town of Windsor, 1 707 838 1195, ceuphrat@townofwindsor.com 19 years of experience 19 years w/GHD Brian Bacciarini | GHD NEPA/CEQA Compliance Lead Education BS, Environmental Studies Certifications Construction Document Technician; OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER; OSHA 8-Hour Annual HAZWOPER; Construction Site Planning and Management Brian will collaborate with the design team and the City to identify and evaluate key environmental considerations surrounding the project. Brian specializes in environmental planning, CEQA/NEPA compliance, natural resource agency permitting, stormwater management, and hazardous materials sampling and reporting. He has extensive experience and relationships with regulators and federal funding program managers, including compliance with Caltrans’ Local Assistance Procedures. Brian’s roadway project experience includes roadway rehabilitations, roundabouts, intersection signalization, bridges, transit stations, pedestrian facilities, utility undergrounding, and overall complete street improvements. Reference: Chris Catbagan, PE, Associate Engineer, City of Santa Rosa, 1 707 543 4521, ccatbagan@srcity.org Reference: Craig Scott, Public Works Director, City of Cotati, 1 707 665 3620, cscott@cotaticity.org Page 482 of 585 22 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H Team Member Related Experience and Qualifications 21 years of experience 18 years w/WRT Jake Tobias, ASLA, LEED AP | WRT Landscape Architecture Lead Education Bachelor of Arts; Masters, Landscape Architecture Licenses/Registrations Landscape Architect,CA #4890; LEED Accredited Professional Jake will be the main point of contact for GHD and coordinate the day-to-day needs of the project. He is a landscape architect and urban designer in WRT’s San Francisco office and his work includes design at the full range of scales from master planning to detail design. Jake’s expertise in streetscape design and familiarity with the City and project area from Phase 1 will provide a firm base of knowledge for the management and design of this project. Reference: Danielle Staude, Senior Planner - Advanced Planning, City of Mill Valley, 1 415 388 4033 x4812, dstaude@cityofmillvalley.org Reference: Vahram Massehian, Senior Project Manager and Compliance Officer, California Pacific Medical Center, 1 415 600 7325, MassehV@sutterhealth.org 23 years of experience 16 years w/C&P Tony Cinquini, PLS | C&P Topographic and Right of Way Survey Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #62341; Professional Land Surveyor, CA #8614; FAA Remote Pilot for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, #3906702 Tony is a California licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Land Surveyor, will lead the land surveying effort. He is responsible for overall topographic and feature mapping, developing the basemap for design, and verifying City right of way boundaries. Tony brings over 20 years of experience in project management, topographic surveys, right of way surveys, legal description and plat preparation, construction surveys, and land survey technology including laser scanning and unmanned aerial systems. This experience enhances his ability to effectively work on infrastructure improvements, redevelopment and development projects, roadway realignments, and utility rehabilitation projects. Reference: Vanessa Garrett, PE, Senior Engineer, City of Rohnert Park, 1 707 588 2251, vgarrett@rpcity.org Reference: Dan Herrera, PE, Senior Civil Engineer, City of Petaluma DPW&U, 1 707 778 4589, dherrera@ci.petaluma.ca.us 11 years of experience 4 years w/AR/WS Marc Ceccarelli | AR/WS Right of Way Appraisal/ Acquisition Lead Education MBA, Finance and Accounting; BA, Philosophy Licenses/Registrations Department Real Estate Salesperson License, CA #01900617; Notary Public Commission, CA #2248498 Marc will provide right of way project management and acquisition services for this project. His responsibilities include communications and negotiations with property owners, preparation of first written offer documents, administrative settlements, escrow instructions and project correspondence. He actively negotiates with property owners and prepares condemnation documents and provides the review of title documents. Reference: Randall Jones, Assistant Engineer, City of Turlock, 1 209 668 6021, rjones@turlock.ca.us Reference: Denise Zitnik, Engineer I, County of Tuolumne, 1 734 218 1294, DZitnik@co.tuolumne.ca.us Page 483 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 23 Team Member Related Experience and Qualifications 21 years of experience 1 year w/CHS Kevin Stankiewicz, PE | CHS Traffic Advisory/Traffic QA/QC Education BS, Civil Engineering Licenses/Registrations Civil Engineer, CA #69878 Kevin is an experienced senior traffic engineer with projects involving traffic operation analyses, traffic simulations, traffic forecasting, coordinated signal timing, signal design, signing and striping plans, construction traffic control and intelligent transportation systems (ITS) design. He has been the traffic lead on corridor studies and large development traffic impact studies. Kevin has successfully managed projects to be completed on time, on budget and meeting quality standards. He also has a track record of preparing PA/ED documents, microscopic traffic simulation calibration reports, traffic sections for the Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Reports, and traffic impact studies that have been accepted by the client. Reference: Karl Westby, Traffic Manager, I-405 Project WDOT, 1 206 949 5275, WestbyK@consultant.wsdot.wa Reference: Emma DalSanto, Transportation Demand Management Coordinator, Resort Municipality of Whistler, BC, 1 604 935 8197, edalsanto@whistler.ca Drone Imagery of State Street at Gobbi Street, City of Ukiah Page 484 of 585 24 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H Project and Management Approach GHD will manage and primarily staff the Project out of our Santa Rosa office and with the same team that delivered the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Phase 1 Project. With this local office, we will be able to be responsive, present, and centralized for effective team interaction and productivity. The con- sistency of our proven project team with its intimate project knowledge and experience enables the team to be ready to go from day one. Matt Kennedy, Principal-in-Charge, and Jeremy Schmal, Project Manager, will work closely to manage the GHD team members and subconsultants. They have success- fully delivered several other projects and will com- municate regularly to make sure individual team member responsibilities are met. Although not as fast-paced as Phase 1 of the proj- ect, Phase 2 has a funding deadline in April 2022, which does not allow for much time to handle un- foreseen delays. Our management approach will strengthen communication with the City and across the team and allow for multiple operations to be un- derway simultaneously under coordinated manage- ment. As shown in Section 6, Schedule of Work and highlighted throughout our proposal, our approach will streamline the right of way and design processes and allow for multiple operations to be underway si- multaneously under coordinated management. Since the Project is high-profile and on a timeline, not only must our technical approach be sound, GHD’s project and management (“project manage- ment”) approach must be well conceived and exe- cuted. The following is a summary of the key consid- erations of our project management approach. Key Management Considerations Opportunity/ Innovative Approach Further Discussion and/or Team’s Value 1 | Turnkey Services Operate as an extension of City staff. Use “lessons learned” during the design and construction of Phase 1 to improve both design and efficiency. Utilize GHD’s diverse in-house expertise resources (traffic, pavement, electrical, LID, geotechnical, construction sequencing, structural, HAZMAT, NEPA, etc.). Experience and expertise in the Caltrans/Federal Funding processes, including the LAPM, etc. GHD is accustomed to holding the role of City Engineer, District Engineer, or other agency positions. Municipal project development and delivery has been our primary focus for over 60 years in California. We recognize the intricacies of redevelopment projects like this Project, verses overlaying rural roads or working in new subdivisions. The project team will be made up of many of the same key players as the Phase 1 design. Our team understands the issues in the corridor, understands the City’s intent and knows how to deliver it. Furthermore, regarding the Ukiah Downtown’s federal funding approval process, GHD has multiple former Caltrans staff and has expertise in taking roadway projects through the CTC process. 2 | Responsiveness to Stakeholder Needs Knowledge of Ukiah, the community, and local process will be paramount to establishing trust and feeling of responsiveness to stakeholders, especially adjacent property owners. Strengthen and augment the City’s outreach and communication efforts by providing support as needed. Reach out to third party utilities that are not controlled by the City immediately to start coordination. Address any other stakeholder concerns. GHD’s PIC and other key team members have been delivering projects for the City for over two decades and have been exceptionally effective on recent efforts. Our recent relevant experience, relationships, and knowledge of the community and interest groups will accelerate coordination, bring trust, and build consensus most expeditiously. WRT and GHD have led and participated in numerous proactive and customized outreach programs on nearby downtown projects, including the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Project Phase 1. Our team knows what it takes to establish an Engagement Program that is effective and responsive to stakeholder needs. GHD has excellent working relationships with the third-party utilities and will ensure contact is made immediately to avoid delays in their participation of the project. Page 485 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 25 3 | Quality & Timeliness of Deliverables Perform over-the-shoulder reviews with City staff to engage input at key stages of a fast-tracked design phase. Implement independent review of deliverables, including constructability reviews. Follow GHD’s ISO 9001 project quality guidelines, as applicable. Consistent, clear communication is vital to complete, timely documents. GHD’s QA/QC Manager Matt Wargula, will oversee project quality. In addition to the cross-team reviews, GHD will utilize internal tools to qualify the project management effort and track progress. 4 | Budget Adherence Remain on point (scope) whenever possible and quickly communicate any potential need for deviation to City. Utilize BST software for project financial management. GHD’s budget management processes will track with Item 3, above, regarding project management. Monthly invoices and a supplemental summary report will be provided to clearly illustrate financials for all three separate funding sources. 5 | Project Schedule Adherence Regular communication between GHD’s PM and the City’s PM is an essential component of schedule maintenance. Project team with intimate knowledge of the corridor. Communicate and begin to address major challenges early in the process so no late surprises. Maintain a shared and living action items list that can be added to, maintained, and utilized by the project team and the City. Initiate simultaneous data collection, design, ROW, and processing efforts where possible. Coordinate early with City utilities and third-party utilities. All members of the project team, from survey to right of way to design have recently worked in this corridor and are set to hit the ground running. Turnkey Services Our ability to provide turnkey services is achieved through proper staffing and training. First, GHD’s approach to this project started years ago with the selection of a knowledgeable, Principal-in-Charge with vast experience in the City Ukiah and a Project Manager with years extensive knowledge of road- way design and years of public outreach and mu- nicipal project delivery experience. Our Project Manager will be supported by our strategic teaming partners WRT, AR/WS, CHS, and C&P to provide the City with staff that are exceptionally skilled at the work required and will allow for our team to operate quickly and effectively as an extension of staff. Since the beginning, GHD has been fully vested in municipal engineering and the delivery of municipal projects. For this project, we are prepared to assist with the preparation of staff reports, work with oth- er departments, take stakeholder phone calls, and address budget and progress questions as they develop. Our proposed Principal-in-Charge, Matt Kennedy, has been supporting the City on numerous projects and is fully aware of the challenges that City staff can face. Responsiveness to Stakeholder Needs GHD assembled this team in response to stakehold- er needs. We will use our collective knowledge of the project, City, agencies, special interest groups, and adjacent owners to make sure all voices are heard from the outset of the project and used to in- form the design. Internal and external communica- tion will be paramount to confirming each stakehold- er is satisfied, or at least know they have had an in- fluence on the process. Quality and Timeliness of Deliverables Through our Project Manager, this team will operate as an extension of City staff, collaborating with City staff as needed throughout project development. We will employ time-tested GHD tools and systems, including our internal management software and our ISO certified Practice Quality Management System. Over our 90-year history, GHD has developed the staff, software, and operating procedures that al- lows us to remain competitive and consistently pro- duce high-quality engineering and environmental documents. Page 486 of 585 26 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H Budget Adherence GHD recognizes the complexities of this project and that the project has a reasonable, yet aggressive schedule to get to construction. A sampling of fac- tors that could affect budget and that will be moni- tored closely include: • Grant processing • Adjacent owner outreach/coordination • Doorway/ADA conform design • Utility coordination/collision avoidance • ROW acquisition/processing • DSA approval (if needed) Section 5 of this proposal includes other manage- ment techniques and tools that we will use to moni- tor and control cost. Project Schedule Adherence GHD recognizes that due to the timing of federal funding and the desire to meet the construction win- dow of this project, the project schedule is very im- portant The combination of our location, resources, knowledge of the corridor, expertise, and past ex- perience on multiple local projects just like this, the Ukiah Project will allow us to be the Team most likely to deliver the project on the most aggressive sched- ule possible. That noted, we will need to proactively manage our time and efforts to achieve the de- sired schedule. We will regularly update a Microsoft Project schedule with the tasks from the detailed project scope throughout the project. The sched- ule will be referenced at each regular Team meeting, which will ensure all parties are on the same page and that critical path items are held top of mind. A project risk review will be done to identify any po- tential fatal flaws or drivers that would impact the project schedule. Sample risk items include ROW, private utilities, HAZMAT, construction sequencing, etc. These items will be tracked and vetted to clear the path for the project as required. The approach to the project schedule is discussed further in Section 5, along with the Scope of Work narrative. Drone Imagery of State Street at Henry Street, City of Ukiah Page 487 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 27 Technical Approach In preparing our technical approach and detailed Scope of Work, we have revisited the Phase 1 proj- ect design in the context of extending the improve- ments approximately 1 block to the north and south in Phase 2. There are several key issues that we have identified and will address in our technical ap- proach. These issues and our proposed approach to addressing them are described in detail below and covered in the various Scope of Work tasks. Pavement Rehabilitation Design One of the most beneficial and visible parts of this project for the motoring public is the pavement re- habilitation and the comfort of driving on a nice, smooth roadway surface. Under this finished prod- uct is the requirement to provide a stable pavement structural section that and performs up to or beyond its anticipated service life, while balancing the poten- tially high cost of pavement rehabilitation. GHD is proposing to utilize the information gath- ered during the design and construction of Phase 1 to develop paving strategies for the Phase 2 sec- tions of the project. Having learned that there is no Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and that the base is cement treated, we propose to save the cost of a geotechnical investigation and rely on the Phase 1 analysis that we know to exist to eliminate guess work and provide the best design solutions for these segments. The existing pavement section completely chang- es at Smith Street. North of Smith Street it is tongue and groove PCC panels, and south of Smith Street it is asphalt concrete over cement treated base. Meaning the sections north of Henry and south of Mill are quite different and require different design strategies. Northern Segment: The existing PCC roadway is an excellent base to overlay. We propose to main- tain and overlay most of this existing pavement section. State Street north of Henry does not have the same design constraints as the block south of Henry Street, which was completely replaced in Phase 1. The segment between Smith Street and Henry Street was lined with store fronts and had a non-standard crown. Although there are a few door conforms north of Henry Street they appear to be higher than the existing sidewalk and in areas where the existing curb is greater than 6-inches. These conditions enable wider sidewalks, a higher gut- ter flowline, and ADA compliant sidewalk slopes. The pavement conform at the new gutter can be achieved by removing and replacing the PCC road- way within 3-ft of the proposed curb and gutter with a standard HMA section, while and an HMA overlay of the existing PCC roadway. The overlay would vary to achieve the desired centerline crown and cross slopes. Southern Segment: During the Phase 1 utility re- placement project, it was discovered that the PCC roadway believed to exist under most of State Street was actually Cement-Treated Base (CTB). The CTB extended across the roadway up to 3 to 4 feet from the existing curb and gutter. It was well-compacted and stable. Based on this new information, a change in design was initiated to leave the CTB in place and to mill and replace the HMA. We recommend the same approach for the southern segment with se- lect dig-out repairs where needed to address local failures. The resulting overlay would incorporate a Sidewalk at State Street and Henry Street State Street and Mill Street Page 488 of 585 28 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H geosynthetic interlayer and 4-5” of HMA and would correct the non-standard cross slope issues. An overlay or other pavement treatment was con- structed at the south end of the project, approxi- mately 200 feet north of Gobbi Street to the inter- section with Gobbi Street. GHD will further evaluate if this section of roadway would be a better candi- date for a traditional mill and overlay, further reducing pavement costs. Integrated Utility Design The City of Ukiah Electric Department is design- ing the undergrounding of power and telecommu- nications under a separate project, and the Public Works Department would like to incorporate that design into the replacement water and sewer design drawings. This approach is similar to what GHD ac- complished in Phase 1, except that in Phase 1 the utility improvements were constructed under a sep- arate contract from the streetscape and road diet improvements. The delivery of the utility design in Phase 1 was gen- erally uncomplicated, but integrating the electrical improvements did present some challenges be- cause the drawings were not prepared to scale and were not tied to any coordinate system. GHD was able to take the Electric Department’s design, ro- tate it and translate it to the State Plane Coordinate system used for the project, and overlay it with the water and sewer design to identify conflicts. The alignments of the water and sewer were estab- lished early in the project with the City to facilitate the abandonment of the existing water mains and install the new sewer in the same alignment as the exist- ing. Adjustments to the duct banks were then made to eliminate the conflicts and more precisely locate them. In Phase 1, the underground power and telecom be- tween Mill Street and Clay Street were generally lo- cated under the west State Street sidewalk and con- structed after the new water main was complete and the existing water lines under the sidewalks could be abandoned/removed. GHD was able to pro- vide an updated layout to the Electric Department’s designer with suggestions to maintain connection points and eliminate conflicts. While it occurred late in the design process, this approach was able to ad- dress all the Electric Department’s and Public Works Department’s utility location requirements and inte- grate the design to allow for a phased approach to construction. Having more time in Phase 2 will allow for a more integrated and coordinated utility design in both the plans and the technical specifications. We understand the City would like to integrate the water and sewer replacement with the electrical undergrounding in a joint trench design to avoid conflicts. We see this approach as very viable, and there appears to be adequate space on the west side of State Street for a joint utility trench that achieves utility separation requirements. It is likely preferable to maintain the sanitary sewer in the ex- isting alignment, as was done in Phase 1, to simplify new lateral connections and minimize conflicts with new and existing utilities. In Phase 2, the City is considering new medians with street trees in both the south and north segments. In Phase 1 medians with street trees were not included in part because of the potential future sewer access challenges they present, including planting street trees directly over the sewer main. In the design workshop GHD will revisit the option for medians in the segment between Gobbi Street and Mill Street where the sewer is generally located along the State Street centerline. In the north between Henry Street and Norton Street the sewer is located on the east side of State Street, and a median/street tree/sewer conflict should not be an issue. State Street looking south of Norton Street Page 489 of 585 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 29 Northern Segment Streetscape Design The existing curb to curb dimension of the north- ern segment of the project is approximately 64 feet. North of Henry Street, the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan proposes a 58 foot curb to curb roadway width, with medians and street trees, while the new Phase 1 width from Smith Street and Henry Street is 53 feet. If medians are in- cluded in this segment, a wider curb to curb with is desirable. Whether or not medians are included the new curb and gutter will need to move inward ne- cessitating the removal and replacement of the ex- isting curb and gutter, sidewalk and possibly also trees. Bulbouts will be similar to those constructed in Phase 1 and could also integrate LID and land- scape/stormwater features. The right of way constraints are similar to those in Phase 1, but without as many storefronts. This will allow for greater flexibility in design, particularly ver- tically as the design seeks to preserve the existing PCC roadway and not alter drainage patterns. In this segment the sewer is located east of the cen- terline and a new planted median could be a wel- coming gateway feature with trees, landscaping and other possibilities. There are a number of driveways to consider, so the exact location and dimensions of medians must be carefully studied to preserve prop- erty access. We are planning for these discussions early in the project during the design workshop. GHD will examine any available records and as-built drawings of the creek crossing to determine the best course of action to accommodate sidewalk widen- ing and pavement rehabilitation. An important con- sideration is the Gibson Creek crossing. During the early design workshop different options will be pre- sented including ideas to highlight the importance of Gibson Creek and enhance greenspaces and pe- destrian features. Southern Segment Streetscape Design Unlike the northern segment, the southern seg- ment presents opportunities to reduce hardscape and project costs by utilizing existing hardscape im- provements. Not only is the pavement section differ- ent from the northern segment, but the width of the roadway also changes. From Mill Street to Seminary Avenue the curb to curb width reduction was subtle at about 1-ft on either side from 55 feet to 53 feet. Continuing this curb line south to Gobbi Street will require careful consideration in the context of pre- serving existing sidewalks and street trees while also achieving the goals of the road diet. The existing curb and gutter and sidewalk south of Mill Street are generally in good shape and GHD would propose to leave as much of the hardscape in place as possible. The corners will be upgrad- ed with new bulbouts and curb ramps, and most of the driveways in this section of roadway are not ADA compliant and need to be upgraded. There are also several frontages along the Rite Aid and Safeway developments that appear to be in good shape and ADA compliant. The Safeway driveways are non-compliant and will need to be replaced, but the remaining hardscape features, including the bus stop can remain. GHD will explore options that pre- serve as much of the existing hardscape and land- scape as possible and present these at the design workshop with the City. There is also maturing landscaping that could be preserved and integrated into the design. Many of the existing tree wells are undersized between Mill Street and Gobbi Street, but there is an opportunity to sawcut and remove a portion of the sidewalk ad- jacent to the roadway to increase them. Selection of the proper trees for these spaces is important to the long-term development of tree health. Also, ma- ny of the existing trees may meet the City’s current criteria for street trees in the area and there could be an additional cost savings in keeping existing trees. The design team will evaluate the corridor and iden- tify locations of new trees and evaluate existing trees State Street at Gobbi Street, Rite-Aid and Safeway Sidewalks Page 490 of 585 30 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 4. O R G A N I Z A T I O N AN D A P P R O A C H to remain to achieve the City’s vision and welcoming feel for the gateway to Downtown Ukiah. Addressing Environmental Requirements and Hazardous Materials Similar to Phase 1, GHD is aware that there may still be abandoned/former heating oil tanks (USTs) within the project limits. These were abandoned in place when PG&E installed gas mains downtown. A number of them were removed in the Phase 1 util- ities project, and most were found to be mostly or completely drained. During design we will work with the City to update and refine the UST removal and abatement language in the specifications to improve the process based on the outcome of Phase 1. GHD has performed an initial Geotracker review of potential contamination sites within the Phase 2 ar- ea. Our initial investigations indicate four closed clean-up sites between Gobbi Street and Mill Street, and one active remediation site at 406 North State Street, a former Shell station at the corner of Henry Street. With this information in mind, we can perform a more detailed hazmat review and depending on the outcome recommend further testing and/or in- clude appropriate language in the specifications re- garding management, characterization and disposal of trench spoils GHD has the internal resources to address the all contamination which may be encountered and can work with the City to tailor the approach depend- ing on whether pre-work is desired or if construction phase remediation is an acceptable approach. We can also provide as needed CEQA/NEPA support should the need arise. Early Design Workshop One of the first tasks to be completed is the topo- graphic and utility survey, which will be performed by our subconsultant C&P who also performed the Phase 1 survey. Their survey work, which will tie into Phase 1, will be critical to understanding the exist- ing geometry and utilities and will provide the con- text for the geometric layout of the Phase 2 street scape and road diet. At completion of the survey and basemap development we will organize a de- sign workshop with the City and key stake holders to review the opportunities, constraints and options for the Phase 2 improvements. The workshop would occur in early March. We will request the layout for the underground electrical and telecom prior to the workshop and will overlay this on to the mapping to identify and resolve early layout conflicts. Our goals for this meeting are to develop concept layouts for new curbs/gutters and bulbouts, feasible median locations, alignments for water and sewer and ad- justments to the underground duct banks, as need- ed. This early engagement with the City will help to accelerate design and could lead to schedule reductions. Public Outreach Assistance In Phase 1 the City Manager’s Office led the com- munity outreach efforts, with the GHD Team sup- porting with graphics and renderings for community meetings and the City’s website, powerpoint pre- sentation, flier graphics for utility bills, and commu- nication assistance. We also attended public meet- ings, met with the tree advisory group and assisted in fielding some calls. While the City did not request public outreach assis- tance with Phase 2, we have included a task to pro- vide a similar level of support, and we are prepared to assist as much or as little as the City needs. We have included effort to develop renderings as part of the design and will provide these for the City’s public meeting and other public outreach efforts. If selected for this project we will work with the City to tailor this task to meet the City’s specific needs for Phase 2. Page 491 of 585 5. S C O P E OF W O R K GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 31 Detailed Scope of Work The City of Ukiah is proposing an improvement proj- ect on State Street, from the north side of Gobbi Street to the south side of Mill Street and the north side of Henry Street to the north side of Norton Street. The project will combine three separate components: Downtown Streetscape, Rule 20 Undergrounding and water and sewer utilities. This scope is to provide professional engineering and related services for the construction of the improve- ments. Anticipated disciplines include civil, survey (topography/ROW), LID, electrical, utility coordination and design, traffic, landscape architecture, right of way (ROW), geotechnical, environmental compliance and hazardous materials. Given that the project involves different funding sourc- es, it is understood that invoicing will be done sepa- rately for each component. To avoid complexities may arise during the invoicing and the State/Federal reim- bursement processes, GHD will keep the tasks of the projects associated with each funding source sep- arate. The GHD Team will work with the City during project setup to use the knowledge and procedures that worked on Phase 1 to confirm invoicing. Below is a Detailed Scope of Work that describes the specific services, tasks, and deliverables to be com- pleted by GHD. Assumptions and exclusions relat- ed to the contract work are listed after the scope or services. Task 1 - Project Management and QA/QC Management activities will consist of a project man- agement plan and internal coordination, maintaining an action item matrix, project schedule, agency co- ordination, project meetings (including agendas and minutes), Caltrans Local Assistance coordination, field reviews and meetings and quality assurance/ quality control as stated in the following sub sections. 1.1 - Project Management and Internal Coordination Supervise, coordinate and monitor planning and de- sign of the project for conformance with standards and policies. The geometric standards will follow Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM, current version), Caltrans 2018 Standard Plans, most cur- rent City Standard Plans, Caltrans 2018 Standard Specifications, and City Standard Special Provisions. In close consultation with the City, GHD will be re- sponsible for project management activities includ- ing oversight, scheduling, action items, reporting, coordination meetings, record keeping and quality assurance. GHD will conduct a kick-off meeting with City staff to finalize the scope of work and schedule, and discuss issues such as the project goals, op- portunities, constraints, information needs, roles, re- sponsibilities, and expectations. GHD will coordinate the project with consultants for timely delivery of quality products. GHD will imple- ment a quality control plan for design activities, per- form quality control reviews for major milestone de- liverables, and submit project deliverables to the City for review in accordance with the approved schedule dates. This task includes one (1) project kick-off meeting with the Project Development Team (PDT) (in per- son or virtual). In preparation of the kick-off meeting, GHD will prepare a Project Management Plan (“work plan”) identifying all major tasks and key milestones, staff assignments and specifying roles and responsi- bilities of GHD Team members and the City. It is understood that Matt Kennedy, PE, TE, will be the Principal-in-Charge and Jeremy Schmal, PE will be the Project Manager; both will be available for regular meetings at the City. Deliverables • Draft Project Management Plan (outline format) • Final Project Management Plan (outline format) Services Provided by City • City will make arrangements for meeting rooms and meeting scheduling • City review by the various departments and divisions will be coordinated by City design staff. Comments will be gathered and submitted to GHD in one comment submittal package Scope of Work5. Page 492 of 585 32 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 5. S C O P E OF W O R K 1.2 - Project Schedule Prepare a detailed Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule using Microsoft Project for the entire proj- ect. Update the CPM schedule after each submittal or on an as-needed basis and submit to the City. It is assumed that the awarded contractor will prepare a detailed construction schedule and GHD will in- clude a milestone schedule for “start” and “end” of construction. Deliverables • CPM schedule - one electronic PDF copy submitted via email 1.3 - Agency Coordination GHD will coordinate with the City, any necessary subconsultants, and involved agencies/stake hold- ers to promote timely flow of information for each task activity. Up to two (2) meetings - it is anticipated that the following City departments, outside agen- cies and stakeholders are: City Public Works (PW), City Electric Department and City Manager’s Office. Deliverables • Meeting agenda and meeting notes will be prepared by GHD and submitted to the City for distribution. Meeting notes will be submitted within 10 working days of the meeting • Record of critical telephone communications will be provided by GHD via email communica- tion to the City within 10 working days of the communication • As-needed meeting presentation materials and handouts will be provided by GHD Services Provided by City • Information regarding direct communication and documentation from City departments and outside agencies affecting the project design will be provided to GHD via email and electronic documents (pdf) • City will make arrangements for meeting room and meeting scheduling 1.4 - Caltrans Local Assistance Coordination GHD will coordinate with the City for the prepara- tion of all applicable deliverables and supporting documents in the format suitable for submission to Caltrans Local Assistance in conformance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). The complete Request for Allocation and Request for Authorization packages will be complet- ed by the GHD Team, along with all required support- ing documentation. Deliverables • Utility Agreements, Notices to Owner (NTO) and Report of Investigation (ROI) • ROW Certification • Request for Authorization/Allocation package for Downtown Streetscape • The GHD Team will assist the City with communi- cation with Caltrans Local Assistance Services Provided by City • City will provide all required background informa- tion to complete forms associated with all steps as outlined in the LAPM 1.5 - Project Meetings Attend meetings such as project/design coordination meetings with the City and other design team mem- bers (5 meetings) and comment review sessions (3 meetings). The meetings will be scheduled in coor- dination with the City. GHD assumes that the meet- ings will be held at the City offices. It is assumed that the Project Manager, the Project Engineer and one additional team member will attend the meetings ad- dressed under this task. Deliverables • Meeting agenda and meeting notes will be prepared by GHD and submitted to the City for distribution. Meeting notes will be submitted with- in 10 working days of the meeting • As-needed meeting presentation materials and handouts will be provided by GHD Services Provided by City • City will make arrangements for meeting room and meeting scheduling. 1.6 - Design Workshop Following completion of the topographic survey, GHD will organize and attend a design workshop. The pur- pose of the design workshop is to review the oppor- tunities, constraints and options for the Phase 2 im- provements. We will request the layout for the under- ground electrical and telecom prior to the workshop and will overlay this on to the mapping to identify and resolve early layout conflicts. Our goals for this meet- ing are to develop concept layouts for new curbs/gut- ters and bulb-outs, feasible median locations, align- ments for water and sewer and adjustments to the un- derground duct banks, as needed. This early engage- Page 493 of 585 5. S C O P E OF W O R K GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 33 ment with the City will help to accelerate design and could lead to schedule reductions. 1.7 - Progress Reporting/Invoicing Prepare and submit monthly progress reports with invoices in accordance with the City requirements clearly separating and identifying the separate project components (Streetscape and Utility). Control of proj- ect costs will be accomplished through a work-break- down structure invoice format; data on each task will include current charges, to-date charges, estimated percent complete, and remaining balance - all by sep- arate project components and individual task. Deliverables • Monthly progress and budget summaries submit- ted electronically (email) with monthly (hard copy) invoices in a format consistent with the LAPM requirements for the downtown streetscape project 1.8 - Quality Assurance/Quality Control GHD senior staff will continue to perform quality con- trol review throughout the project duration and the project manager will perform a quality assurance au- dit prior to major submittals to the City (per ISO 9001 Certification). Engineer level staff will perform the reg- ular quality control reviews/checks and manager level staff will perform the quality control reviews/audit prior to major submittals. The QA/QC review documenta- tion be kept at the GHD office and will be made avail- able for review by the City. Deliverables • Red-lined review comment and response sheets Task 2 - Surveys, Mapping and Site Data 2.1 - Background Research This task will consist of data collection and review of activities, including assembling available information from the City and identifying additional data and in- formation that is required to properly design the im- provements. GHD will request and review any readily available reports, studies, as-built/development plans from the City to identify roadway alignment, structur- al sections, other built features, ROW, near-term and future projects planned in the area and/or by the City and other pertinent information. 2.2 - Surveys and Mapping Cinquini & Passarino (C&P) will perform the topo- graphic surveys necessary for the design of the streetscape, road diet and utilities improvement proj- ect. All topographic mapping will be at a drawing scale of 1 inch = 20 feet, unless otherwise request- ed, with a one-foot contour interval. The topograph- ic survey will include the following: • Topographic survey coverage area will include State Street beginning 200 feet south of Gobbi Street to the previous survey limit at Mill Street and the previous survey limit at Henry Street to 200 feet north of Norton Street • The width of the survey will be from face of build- ing to face of building. If the building face is not located at the back of sidewalk, C&P will map 10 feet beyond the back of sidewalk. • Topographic survey will include all necessary work to produce a topographic map, including features such as, but not limited to; building corners and elevations, curb lines, water meters, sewer cleanouts, valves, manholes (including rim, invert and pipe information), utility markings on the pavement, utility poles, driveway and doorway locations, sidewalks, trees four (4) inch- es and larger, retaining wall or decorative walls, and any other pertinent information that could apply to the project during design. • Topographic survey will be provided on North American Vertical Datum of 1988. • Topographic map to horizontally relate California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone II. C&P understand that time is critical on this project and we have prepared a critical path workflow to assist with the schedule. We propose to locate the survey control set with Phase 1 of the project and set additional control where needed and then im- mediately begin the topographic mapping, all upon receiving notice to proceed. Upon completion of the field mapping we will begin the office processing and drafting. Deliverables • Topographic survey - information shall be complete and comprehensive for design use; shall include all surface features within the proposed project limits and construction zone Services Provided by City • Any existing topography information (in electron- ic format where available) Page 494 of 585 34 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 5. S C O P E OF W O R K • Any existing ROW locations and parcel owner- ship information 2.3 - Site Visit (with City) Following the kick-off meeting GHD will perform a site visit with the City to review field conditions and develop an early understanding of the project de- sign. Field investigations will be performed by GHD engineers and subconsultants and coordinated with City staff to identify existing surface features, areas of improvements, any potential alternatives, and photograph the site to serve as the basis for defining the constraints. 2.4 - Utility Potholing GHD will review existing utility information and noti- fy the City of any conflicts with proposed improve- ments after preliminary alignment of the sewer and water are determined. For identified utility conflict locations, GHD will propose those locations for pot- holing. The anticipated utilities to be affected or be in potential conflict include sewer, water, storm drain, gas, dry utilities (traffic signal conduit, u/g electric, etc). To collect data for the accurate design of these utilities, utility potholing is proposed to collect field verified subsurface information. For consideration, it is anticipated that approximately 10 potholes will be required for the project (approximately 1 pothole per 150 LF of roadway). Deliverables • Depth, size and material of identified utilities Services Provided by City • No cost encroachment permit for completion of pothole activities 2.5 - Geotechnical Investigation (Optional) If requested by the City, GHD will perform geotechnical investigation services and prepare a geotechnical report to support the project design. This geotechnical information will be used to design the LID components, recommend pavement struc- tural sections, determine overlay/PCC depths and identify possible issues with utility construction. It is anticipated that geotechnical services will include the following: • 5 borings to a depth of 5-6 feet, which would re- quire traffic control, and possibly a utility locator • Run perc tests in 2-3 holes to get infiltration characteristics • Standard R-value and Atterberg testing • Groundwater Level (if occurring within boring limits) Deliverables • Draft Geotechnical Report • Final Geotechnical Report Services Provided by City • No cost encroachment permit for completion of coring activities • Any recent existing ADT vehicle counts or calcu- lated Traffic Index for State Street If the optional task of a geotechnical investigation is not completed, the design team will utilize the geotechnical information collected as part of Phase 1 and update the pavement recommendations in the context of the Phase 1 construction and this Phase 2 project. Task 3 - Outreach and Coordination with Adjacent Properties 3.1 - Community Outreach The goals of the GHD Team for this task are to assist the City to: • Inform/remind the community about the project • Build a database of interested people to remain in contact with during construction • Combine in person and online engagement to maximize contact • Target downtown merchants and property owners The GHD Team will prepare printed and online ma- terials as requested by the City to inform the public about the project and associated events. Emphasis will be placed on downtown businesses and property owners. Deliverables • Provide information for City hosted website - project information, meeting notifications, and sign up for notices • Project Information Sheet: A written project sheet can be distributed by the City. Meetings and the website URL will be included • Meeting Flyer (1) • News Articles (2) • Targeted Emails and Calls (5): The GHD Team Page 495 of 585 5. S C O P E OF W O R K GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 35 will participate in calls to strategic individuals to discuss the project. During the conversation, GHD will learn about their interest, opportunities, challenges, and test our engagement strategy Meetings Public Workshop: The GHD Team will participate in a meeting to present the project including mobili- ty, safety, LID, and community character features. Attendees will have the opportunity to see and dis- cuss the proposed design features illustrated on dis- play boards. Rendered plans, sketch views, and ma- terial samples will be shared. The illustrative materials can be used by the City for subsequent display in a storefront the library, or City Hall. The GHD Team will be available to discuss the proposed design and set future goals for construction logistics and communi- cations during construction. Project representatives will remain available for an additional half-day in order to provide the greatest flexibility to interested people. 3.2 - Adjacent Property Owner Coordination The GHD Team will make contact and coordinate with adjacent property owners, as needed, to dis- cuss project impacts and modifications proposed to occur in the public ROW adjacent to their proper- ties. Potential impacts include sidewalk and driveway modifications, landscaping and site furniture. Deliverables • Field notes, suggestions, and questions gath- ered from coordination activities having potential effects on proposed improvements Services Provided by City • All available property owner information for potentially affected parcels Task 4 - Utility Coordination 4.1 - Water, Sewer and Storm Drain Coordination The purpose of this task is to gather all information regarding the City’s water, sewer and storm drain systems (wet utilities) within the project area and en- sure they are accurately displayed in the plans. As the design of the proposed improvements progresses, potential conflicts will be identified and transmitted to the City for their review. This task supplements but does not include the de- sign of the new 12-inch sanitary sewer main and new 12-inch water main in State Street, including new services, laterals and abandonment of existing mains, laterals and services. It is assumed that the City has completed all planning and analysis neces- sary for determining the size and capacity of the new mains. Deliverables • Exhibits identifying potential conflicts Services Provided by City • All available information on location (horizontal and vertical) of known existing water, sewer and storm drain lines within the project vicinity 4.2 - City Electric Utility Coordination and Design At project onset, GHD will request CAD design files for the City Electric Utility’s undergrounding project to review the layout and identify potential conflicts. GHD will engage the City’s Public Works and Electric Departments if conflicts are identified to develop solutions. The design of the new joint trench will be completed by the City Electric Utility with the design incorporat- ed into the overall design prepared by GHD. Deliverables • Exhibits identifying potential conflicts and solutions Services Provided by City • Design files in CAD format for the joint trench at each project phase 4.3 - Utility Relocation of non-City Owned Facilities Plans will be submitted to all utility companies with facilities identified within the project limits including but not limited to PG&E (gas), AT&T, and Comcast. If conflicts are identified and the need for relocations are determined, GHD will coordinate with the affect- ed utility company. The design will be prepared to avoid potential conflicts whenever possible, but it is anticipated that relocations will be warranted. GHD will handle preparations of the Notice to Owner and accompanying documentation needed for the relo- cation in compliance with the LAPM. Page 496 of 585 36 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 5. S C O P E OF W O R K Task 5 - Environmental Compliance & Support 5.1 - Environmental Clearance It is our understanding that the City has or will be ac- quiring all environmental clearances for Phase 2. This task includes a limited number of hours for a GHD environmental specialist to collaborate with the design team and the City on environmental compli- ance, if needed. This task includes time for meet- ings and conference calls, assisting with a notice of exemption for the proposed utility improvements, coordination on Caltrans-related matters, and iden- tifying key environmental considerations surrounding the project if the need arises. 5.2 - Hazardous Materials Assessment and Support (Optional) The costs of managing contaminated materials can be significant and encountering contamination unex- pectedly can result in project delays and higher con- struction costs. GHD will complete a hazardous ma- terials corridor study. The corridor study will be completed using existing publicly available information to identify sites and areas where contamination is known or potential- ly present in the project area. GHD will review data available for each of the contaminated or potential- ly contaminated sites along the project corridor to determine if soil contamination is likely to be found in the material that will be excavated during the project. A report will summarize the findings of the corridor study, including a map identifying contaminated and potentially contaminated sites. If warranted, GHD will recommend conducting lim- ited soil borings to confirm contamination and tabu- late estimates of volume, tonnage and costs associ- ated with contaminated soil disposal, and regulatory process requirements if underground tanks or con- tamination is encountered. Task 6 - ROW Engineering 6.1 - ROW Consulting AR/WS will provide right of way services to GHD for the City’s Downtown Streetscape Project - Phase 2. Services include preparation and solicitation of voluntary permits to enter and construct from up to 31 property owners along S. State St. between 1) E. Gobbi St. to E. Mill St. and 2) W. Henry St. to Norton St. Section 8.09.10.00 Construction Permits and Permits to Enter and Construct of the Caltrans Right of Way Manual states “When temporary rights are needed to perform work for the grantor’s benefit, a Permit to Enter and Construct or Construction Permit may be used.” Based on our understanding of the project, soliciting Permits to Enter and Construct (PTECs) from the grantors is an appropriate approach to gain access to private property along S. State St. AR/WS previously worked with GHD on Phase 1 of the project and employed this approach. All AR/WS services will comply with pertinent sections of the Caltrans Right of Way Manual. Permits to Enter and Construct • AR/WS will review the properties that will require PTEs and identify owner contact information. • With input regarding project construction and project needs from GHD, AR/WS will prepare draft PTEs for GHD and City review and approval. • Notify property owners with a letter and PTE Agreement for signature, and follow up with prop- erty owners. • Continuous coordination with property owners to obtain voluntarily signed PTE. Follow up will be primarily by phone calls, email correspondence and personal meetings. Personal meetings are limited to a total of 45 for the entire project. • AR/WS will coordinate on-site meetings with project Team members, property owners and/ or tenants, as necessary (included in the 45 person- al meetings above). • AR/WS will serve as the point of contact for prop- erty owners and tenants and will be available to respond to inquiries. • Develop and utilize a project status report that will keep GHD and City informed of progress and will address critical milestones, status, scheduling, and areas of concern. 6.2 - Record of Survey Cinquini & Passarino will create Record of Surveys as required. Deliverables • Record of Survey Page 497 of 585 5. S C O P E OF W O R K GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 37 For purposes of schedule and scoping, it is under- stood that condemnation will not be required for ac- quisition of any property for the project. Task 7 - Design It is understood that invoicing will be separated be- tween grant eligible and non-grant eligible funding and tasks will be broken out as such. For ease un- derstanding, the designs of the different attributes of the projects have been combined in the scope of the design phase of the project. 7.1 - 30% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate GHD’s design efforts will include the civil, survey (co- ordination), landscape architecture, storm drain, utili- ty, electrical, traffic, technical reports, and engineering design. The 30% design will include all aspects of the project, including the Downtown Streetscape, Utilities and Rule 20 Undergrounding Project improvements. GHD will prepare 30% plan set that will reflect the work completed previously through the design work- shop and community engagement and reflected in the reports and plans outlining the project intent and illustrating anticipated improvements. The Team will begin designing as the topographic survey informa- tion becomes available, and potential issues and challenges will be communicated early to the City’s team so resolution can be reached early and avoid impacting deliverables. GHD staff will perform a site visit and note existing drainage patterns along the length of the project seg- ment. GHD shall seek to collect surface runoff and convey it to existing drainage systems and/or newly constructed LID compliant facilities. In addition, GHD will prepare a site-specific hydrology and hydraulic analysis at the culvert to evaluate existing capacity/ flooding concerns. This project will need to comply with the storm wa- ter management requirements of the Storm Water Low Impact Development Technical Design Manual developed by the City of Santa Rosa and County of Sonoma, as related to the MS4 Permit. Preliminary LID layouts will be included with the 30% Submittal, with the Storm Water Control Plan and additional cal- culations to be submitted at 60%. GHD anticipates that the 30% plan set will include Title Sheet, Typical Sections, Construction Details, Traffic Striping, Utilities, Rule 20 Undergrounding, Street Lighting, Landscape Plans and Irrigation Plan. Layouts will show R/W (TCE) needs, profiles, rough grading, and drainage, including potential LID facil- ities. The plan and profile drawings will include pro- files of the proposed centerline and other applicable surface features. GHD has allowed three weeks for City review. GHD will prepare plans using AutoCAD C3D 2018 or newer version. Signing and striping plans will be up- dated from the conceptual format to a construction document format. Deliverables • 30% plan set, and cost estimate (four hard-copy full size sets) and electronic submittal (pdf) Services Provided by City • City will distribute 30% documents and gath- er comments and will provide one comment package to GHD from Public Works and one comment package from the City Electrical Utility 7.2 - 60% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate GHD’s design efforts will include the civil, survey (co- ordination), landscape architecture, storm drain, util- ity, electrical/street lighting, traffic, and City Electric Utility. The 60% design will include all aspects of the project, including the Downtown Streetscape and Utilities Project improvements. In the budget analy- sis for the remainder of design efforts, GHD identi- fied the following four tasks involving the disciplines noted above: • Plan Preparation • Specifications • Quantity Calculations • Cost Estimation GHD will prepare 60% PS&E that will incorporate responses to the City’s comments on 30% plan set and also include various refined/additional contract details. GHD will also provide the City with project special provisions. GHD will request the current City Special Provisions standard boilerplate that also in- cludes the front end portion of the specifications. GHD will prepare the project specifications using Phase 1 as an example. The plan and profile drawings will include profiles of the proposed centerline and other applicable sur- Page 498 of 585 38 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 5. S C O P E OF W O R K face features. This submittal will also include Draft Special Provisions and Engineer’s estimate. GHD anticipates the following tentative plan sheets as part of the 60% submittal: Sheet Description • Title Sheet & General Notes • Survey Control, Abbreviations, Legend • Typical Sections • LID Plans • Layout Sheets (Demolition, Utility, Surface Improvements with Grading and Utility Profiles) • Rule 20 Undergrounding Layout and Details • Cross Sections • Electrical Plans (Lighting) • Electrical Details • Landscape Plans • Landscape Details • Irrigation Plans • Irrigation Details • Traffic Signal Plans and Schedules • Traffic Signal Details • Traffic Striping and Signage • Erosion Control Plans • Erosion Control Details GHD anticipates that the City staff will review the 90% contract documents and provide the respons- es back to GHD in three weeks. GHD will prepare a 60% level estimated probable construction cost. For any elements that are not fully developed at this stage, the estimate for those items will be “assigned” based on similar facilities. Deliverables • 60% plan set, technical specifications and cost estimate (four hardcopy full size sets) and elec- tronic submittal (pdf) • Draft Storm Water Control Plan Services Provided by City • City will distribute PS&E and gather comments and will provide one comment package to GHD from Public Works and one comment package from City Electrical Utility City will provide boil- erplate specifications to use for “front end” and special provisions format in electronic (Microsoft Word) format 7.3 - 90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate GHD’s design efforts will include the civil, survey (co- ordination), landscape architecture, storm drain, util- ity, electrical, traffic, and environmental groups. The 90% design will include all aspects of the project, including the Downtown Streetscape and Utilities Project improvements. GHD will prepare 90% PS&E that will address com- ments on the 60% plan set and also include various refined/additional contract details. GHD will provide the City with a complete draft project special provi- sions that will address issues such as materials spec- ification, testing requirements, payment item descrip- tions, and other requirements as well as any respons- es to comments on the 60% special provisions. The plan and profile drawings will include profiles of the proposed centerline, utilities and other applicable surface features. This submittal will also include Draft Special Provisions and Engineer’s estimate. GHD anticipates the following plan sheets as part of the 90% submittal: Sheet Description • Title Sheet & General Notes • Survey Control, Abbreviations, Legend • Typical Sections • LID Plans • Layout Sheets (Demolition, Utility, Surface Improvements with Grading and Utility Profiles) • Rule 20 Undergrounding Layout and Details • Cross Sections • Electrical Plans (Lighting) • Electrical Details • Landscape Plans • Landscape Details • Irrigation Plans • Irrigation Details • Traffic Signal Plans and Schedules • Traffic Signal Details • Traffic Striping and Signage • Erosion Control Plans • Erosion Control Details GHD anticipates that the City staff will review the 90% contract documents and provide the respons- es back to GHD in three weeks. GHD will update the project special provisions to a pre-final level. GHD will prepare a 90% level estimated probable construction cost. GHD will perform a constructability review utiliz- Page 499 of 585 5. S C O P E OF W O R K GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 39 ing in-house construction management staff inspec- tors or engineers. Deliverables • 90% PS&E (four full size hard copy sets) Services Provided by City • City will distribute PS&E and gather comments and will provide one comment package to GHD • City will provide boilerplate specifications to use for “front end” and special provisions format in electronic (Microsoft Word) format • City will provide example project technical spec- ifications from a previous project for reference and format 7.4 - Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (Bid Set) GHD will update the PS&E based on comments received and finalize the PS&E to be ready for ad- vertisement. In addition to updated project specifi- cations and estimate, GHD anticipates that the fi- nal plan set will include the following updated plan sheets: Sheet Description • Title Sheet & General Notes • Survey Control, Abbreviations, Legend • Typical Sections • Construction Details • LID Plans and Details • Layout Sheets (Demo, Utility, Surface Improvements with Grading/Profile) • Rule 20 Undergrounding Layout and Details • Cross Sections • Electrical Plans (Lighting) • Electrical Details • Landscape Plans • Landscape Details • Irrigation Plans • Irrigation Details • Traffic Signal Plans and Schedules • Traffic Signal Details • Traffic Striping and Signage • Traffic Constraints/Handling Plans • Erosion Control Plans • Erosion Control Details GHD will prepare Final plans using AutoCAD C3D 2018 or newer version. GHD will prepare Final spec- ifications in City format. GHD will prepare a final level probable construction cost. Deliverables • Final PS&E (one hard copy - mylar, PDF print- able files, Special Provisions in MS Word) • Electronic Autocad drawing files will be transmit- ted within 10 working days of final PS&E Task 8 - Project Advertisement and Bid Support 8.1- Bid Support GHD will provide design support during project ad- vertisement by answering contractor inquiries and preparing any addendums that may be required. GHD will attend a pre-bid meeting if requested by City. GHD will review and respond to technical ques- tions forwarded from the City during bid phase. GHD will prepare and keep records of necessary addendum and modifications for City issuance. For purpose of the Fee Estimate, it is estimated that two (2) addenda will be prepared. Deliverables • Responses to RFIs • Addenda Services Provided by City • Questions from bidders will be directed to City • Technical questions will be directed to GHD from City • Reproduction of Contract Documents for Plan Holders during bid phase • Advertisement and bid opening • Scheduling of pre-bid meeting, if any • Distribution of addenda to all plan holders Task 9 - Construction Phase Support & Construction Management (Optional) GHD can provide construction engineering support, construction management and construction obser- vation as needed by the City. We can work in a staff augmentation arrangement and provide as much or as little as needed. GHD is also available to assist with Caltrans payment processing and related ad- ministrative tasks. Page 500 of 585 40 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 6. S C H E D U L E OF W O R K Schedule of Work ID Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish 1 Submit Proposal 1 day Thu 2/4/21 Thu 2/4/21 2 City Coucil awards professional service agreement 1 day Wed 2/17/21 Wed 2/17/21 3 Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 2/17/21 Wed 2/17/21 4 Task 1: Project Management and QA/QC 257 days Thu 2/18/21 Fri 2/11/22 5 1.1 Project Management and Internal Coordination 250 days Thu 2/18/21 Wed 2/2/22 6 1.2 Project Schedule 147 days Thu 2/18/21 Fri 9/10/21 7 1.3 Agency Coordination 147 days Thu 2/18/21 Fri 9/10/21 8 1.4 Caltrans Local Assistance Coordination 250 days Thu 2/18/21 Wed 2/2/22 9 1.5 Project Meetings 250 days Thu 2/18/21 Wed 2/2/22 10 1.6 Design Workshop 1 day Tue 3/9/21 Tue 3/9/21 11 1.7 Progress Reporting and Invoicing 250 days Mon 3/1/21 Fri 2/11/22 24 1.8 Quality Assurance / Quality Control 147 days Thu 2/18/21 Fri 9/10/21 25 Task 2: Surveys, Mapping and Site Data 40 days Mon 2/22/21 Fri 4/16/21 26 2.1 Background Research 5 days Mon 2/22/21 Fri 2/26/21 27 2.2 Surveys and Mapping 5 days Tue 2/23/21 Mon 3/1/21 28 2.3 Kick Off Meeting and Site Visit (with City)1 day Thu 2/25/21 Thu 2/25/21 29 2.4 Utility Potholing 5 days Mon 4/12/21 Fri 4/16/21 30 2.5 Geotechnical Investigation (Optional)10 days Tue 2/23/21 Mon 3/8/21 31 Task 3: Outreach and Coordination with Adjacent Properties 45 days Thu 2/25/21 Wed 4/28/21 32 3.1 Community Outreach 45 days Thu 2/25/21 Wed 4/28/21 33 3.2 Adjacent Property Owner Coordination 45 days Thu 2/25/21 Wed 4/28/21 34 Task 4: Utility Coordination 141 days Fri 2/26/21 Fri 9/10/21 35 4.1 Water, Sewer and Storm Drain Coordination 30 days Tue 3/2/21 Mon 4/12/21 36 4.2 City Electric Utility Coordination and Design 141 days Fri 2/26/21 Fri 9/10/21 37 4.3 Utility Relocation of City and non‐City Owned Facilities 103 days Tue 3/2/21 Thu 7/22/21 38 Task 5: Environmental Compliance & Support 60 days Mon 4/12/21 Fri 7/2/21 39 5.1 Environmental Clearance 60 days Mon 4/12/21 Fri 7/2/21 40 5.2 Hazardous Materials Assessment and Support (Optional)20 days Mon 4/12/21 Fri 5/7/21 41 Task 6: Right of Way Engineering 111 days Fri 4/9/21 Fri 9/10/21 42 6.1 ROW Consulting 25 days Fri 4/9/21 Thu 5/13/21 43 Permits to Enter 46 days Fri 5/14/21 Fri 7/16/21 44 6.2 Record of Survey 20 days Mon 8/16/21 Fri 9/10/21 45 Task 7: Design 147 days Thu 2/18/21 Fri 9/10/21 46 7.1 30% PS&E Submittal 37 days Thu 2/18/21 Fri 4/9/21 47 Design 16 days Thu 2/18/21 Thu 3/11/21 48 QC Review 5 days Fri 3/12/21 Thu 3/18/21 49 City Review 30% PS&E 15 days Fri 3/19/21 Thu 4/8/21 50 30% Design Review Meeting 1 day Fri 4/9/21 Fri 4/9/21 51 7.2 60% PS&E Submittal 46 days Fri 4/9/21 Fri 6/11/21 52 Design 25 days Fri 4/9/21 Thu 5/13/21 53 QC Review 5 days Fri 5/14/21 Thu 5/20/21 54 City Review 60% PS&E 15 days Fri 5/21/21 Thu 6/10/21 55 60% Design Review Meeting 1 day Fri 6/11/21 Fri 6/11/21 56 7.3 90% PS&E Submittal 45 days Mon 6/14/21 Fri 8/13/21 57 Design 25 days Mon 6/14/21 Fri 7/16/21 58 QC Review 4 days Mon 7/19/21 Thu 7/22/21 59 City Review 90% PS&E 15 days Fri 7/23/21 Thu 8/12/21 60 90% Design Review Meeting 1 day Fri 8/13/21 Fri 8/13/21 61 7.4 Final PS&E (Bid Set)20 days Mon 8/16/21 Fri 9/10/21 62 Task 8: Project Advertisement and Bid Support 109 days Mon 9/13/21 Thu 2/10/22 63 Submit final contract documents, ROW certification, request for allocation, and request for authorization to Caltrans Local Assistance 10 days Mon 9/13/21 Fri 9/24/21 64 Authorization to Proceed with Construction 60 days Mon 9/27/21 Fri 12/17/21 65 Project Bid Advertisement 1 day Mon 1/10/22 Mon 1/10/22 66 8.1 Bid Support 24 days Mon 1/10/22 Thu 2/10/22 67 Task 9: Construction Phase Support & Construction Management (Optional)150 days Fri 3/18/22 Thu 10/13/22 68 9.1 Construction Engineering Support 150 days Fri 3/18/22 Thu 10/13/22 69 9.2 Construction Management 150 days Fri 3/18/22 Thu 10/13/22 2/17 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovQtr 1, 2021 Qtr 2, 2021 Qtr 3, 2021 Qtr 4, 2021 Qtr 1, 2022 Qtr 2, 2022 Qtr 3, 2022 Qtr 4, 20 City of UkiahDowntown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities ProjectRFP Schedule 6. Page 501 of 585 7. C O N F L I C T O F I N T E R E S T ST A T E M E N T | 8. L I T I G A T I O N GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 41 Conflict of Interest Statement7. To the best of our knowledge, GHD Inc. does not have any past, present, or future Conflicts of Interest of any kind (financial, business, or other relationship) that would result from performing work under this contract for the City of Ukiah as outlined in this RFP. GHD Inc. does not have any current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this contract or the construction projects that will follow. GHD Inc. does not have any financial interest or relationship with any construction company that might sub- mit a bid on construction projects under this contract. To eliminate or avoid any actual or perceived conflicts of interest in the future, GHD commits that no person having any such interest shall be employed or retained by us under this Agreement. We will not hire the City’s employees to perform any portion of the work or services specified, including secretarial, clerical and similar incidental services except upon the written approval of the City. Litigation8. GHD trusts the City will appreciate that due to the commercial sensitivity and confidentiality of any litigation in which GHD may be presently involved, GHD is not at liberty to disclose the information sought. However, we point out that as a component of its prudent risk management practices, GHD obtains high-quality pro- fessional liability insurance in the world market and domestically in the US to provide cover in the industries in which it operates. As a consequence of engaging in business, there are sometimes claims asserted which may or may not give rise to litigation. The details and progress of any such claims are by necessity commercially sensitive and re- main in confidence. We are able to inform you that there have been claims notified in the normal course of business, none of which we believe are material to the services which are the subject of your RFP. There are however presently no significant ongoing contract failures, no criminal matters, and there have been no judgments against GHD Inc. within the last five years. Page 502 of 585 42 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 9. P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S AG R E E M E N T Professional Services Agreement9. Contract Acceptance GHD has reviewed the proposed contract agreement and does not have any issues nor need any changes. Proposal Terms GHD affirms that the terms of this proposal shall remain in effect for 90 days from the date this proposal is submitted. BST Accounting/Management Software GHD utilizes BST accounting/project management software. The BST software is specifically designed for A&E firms/contracts and is designed to meet 48 CFR Part 16.301-3, 49 CFR Part 18, and CFR Part 31 re- quirements and guidelines. This system has been proven on many federal projects in the past few years. BST conforms to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GHD followed the set up instructions that pro- vides for the segregation of direct costs/indirect costs, identification and accumulation of direct costs by con- tract, and accumulation of costs under general ledger control. Our system provides a consistent method for allocation of indirect costs to intermediate and final cost objectives. The GHD accounting system includes a labor distribution system. This is accomplished by assigning a proj- ect account number, billing group, task numbers, and subtask numbers. Also a labor distribution system that charges direct and indirect labor to the appropriate cost objectives. Page 503 of 585 10 . F E D E R A L - A I D PR O V I S I O N S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 43 Federal-Aid Provisions10. Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O1 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment EXHIBIT 10-O1CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal: 3. Project Description: 4. Project Location: 5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE: 8. DBE 7. Description of Work, Service, or Materials Certification Supplied Number 17. Local Agency Contract Number: 18. Federal-Aid Project Number: 19. Proposed Contract Execution Date: 20. Consultant’s Ranking after Evaluation: __________________________ Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate. 21. Local Agency Representative's Signature 22. Date 23. Local Agency Representative's Name 24. Phone 25. Local Agency Representative's Title 9. DBE Contact Information 10. DBE % Local Agency to Complete this Section 11. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION % IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required. 12. Preparer's Signature 13. Date 14. Preparer's Name 15. Phone 16. Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: Original – Included with consultant’s proposal to local agency. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. LPP 18-01 Page 1 of 2 January 2019 City of Ukiah Traffic Advisory, Traffic QA/QC 32117 02/04/2021 1 707 540 9687Matt Kennedy, PE, TE Principal 2.4% 2.4% CHS Consulting Group, 1617 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612, 1 510 707 6347 Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 City of UkiahCity of Ukiah GHD Inc. 2% Page 504 of 585 44 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 10 . F E D E R A L - A I D PR O V I S I O N S Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information Page 1 of 3 LPP 13-01 January, 2018 EXHIBIT 10-I NOTICE TO PROPOSERS DBE INFORMATION The Agency has established a DBE goal for this Contract of ____________% OR The Agency has not established a goal for this Contract. However, proposers are encouraged to obtain DBE participation for this contract. 1. TERMS AS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT • The term “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise” or “DBE” means a for-profit small business concern owned and controlled by a socially and economically disadvantaged person(s) as defined in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 26.5. • The term “Agreement” also means “Contract.” • Agency also means the local entity entering into this contract with the Contractor or Consultant. • The term “Small Business” or “SB” is as defined in 49 CFR 26.65. 2. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY A. DBEs and other small businesses are strongly encouraged to participate in the performance of Contracts financed in whole or in part with federal funds (See 49 CFR 26, “Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs”). The Consultant must ensure that DBEs and other small businesses have the opportunity to participate in the performance of the work that is the subject of this solicitation and should take all necessary and reasonable steps for this assurance. The proposer must not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of subcontracts. B. Proposers are encouraged to use services offered by financial institutions owned and controlled by DBEs. 3. SUBMISSION OF DBE INFORMATION If there is a DBE goal on the contract, Exhibit 10-O1 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment must be included in the Request for Proposal. In order for a proposer to be considered responsible and responsive, the proposer must make good faith efforts to meet the goal established for the contract. If the goal is not met, the proposer must document adequate good faith efforts. All DBE participation will be counted towards the contract goal; therefore, all DBE participation shall be collected and reported. Exhibit 10-O2 Consultant Contract DBE Information must be included with the Request for Proposal. Even if no DBE participation will be reported, the successful proposer must execute and return the form. 4. DBE PARTICIPATION GENERAL INFORMATION It is the proposer’s responsibility to be fully informed regarding the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26, and the Department’s DBE program developed pursuant to the regulations. Particular attention is directed to the following: A. A DBE must be a small business firm defined pursuant to 13 CFR 121 and be certified through the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP). 2% Page 505 of 585 10 . F E D E R A L - A I D PR O V I S I O N S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 45 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Page 1 LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013 EXHIBIT 10-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352 1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type: a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial b. grant b. initial award b. material change c. cooperative agreement c. post-award d. loan For Material Change Only: e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________ f. loan insurance date of last report __________ 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: Prime Subawardee Tier _______ , if known Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known 6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description: CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________ 8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known: 10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary) 12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer b. one-time fee 13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee b. in-kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________ 15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 11: 16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No (attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary) 17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to Congress semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Signature: ________________________________________ Print Name: _______________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________ Telephone No.: ____________________ Date: ___________ Authorized for Local Reproduction Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06 Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files (If individual, last name, first name, MI) including address if different from No. 10a (If individual, last name, first name, MI) 02/04/20211 707 540 9687 Matt Kennedy, PE, TE Principal N/A Page 506 of 585 46 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD 11 . C O S T PR O P O S A L GHD’s cost proposal is provided in separately sealed envelope. Page 507 of 585 AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 47 Jeremy Schmal has over 14 years of experience in civil engineering working with the public sector. He has performed project management and project engineer duties on numerous multi million dollar public works transportation improvement projects, including roundabouts, roadway widening, utility relocation, intersection improvements and traf- fic signals, and pedestrian improvement projects. Jeremy also has expe- rience in construction management, where he has acted as Resident Engineer and Lead Inspector. Other experience includes traffic engineer- ing, analysis and planning, federal aid funding, high visibility pedestrian projects, and construction and bid support. Project Experience • Deputy Project Manager | Ukiah Streetscape and Road Diet | Ukiah, CA | This federally, state and locally funded project includes a road diet through downtown Ukiah reducing the travel lanes, improv- ing parking and pedestrian improvements, adding landscaping and rebuilding the roadway, which includes sections of old concrete Highway 101 for a half mile of State Street. The project also includes modification of three traffic signals and sewer and water main replacements. • Project Engineer | Healdsburg Five Way Intersection | Healdsburg, CA | The project included constructing a five way roundabout, as well as extensive utility improvements. The proj- ect replaced the existing five legged signalized intersection with a single lane modern roundabout with an at grade heavy rail cross- ing traversing through the center of the intersection. The project also replaced the sanitary sewer trunk main, water mains, storm drain and reconstructed a box culvert through the intersection. Responsible for finalizing the plans and specifications and assist- ing through the bid process through to contract award. Once in construction he assisted the construction manager handling design changes and clarifications, RFIs and submittals. • Project Manager | Devlin Road Segment H and Vine Trail Extension Project | American Canyon, CA | Managed all aspects of design of this roadway project through a greenfield in the City of American Canyon. The nearly 1-mile long new roadway included design of the extension of the Vine Trail, which is a multi-use master planned trail through Napa County. It also included right-of-way acquisition, design of a new box culvert, utility design and coordina- tion, and LID storm water solutions, such as bio-retention. The road- way cuts through areas of wetlands which required mitigations and coordination with multiple government agencies. • Project Manager | City Hall Campus Sidewalk Reconstruction | Santa Rosa, CA | Managed pedestrian facility improvement and reconstruction project located within a built out portion of down- town Santa Rosa. All ramps and driveways within the project area were non-ADA compliant, as well as most of the sidewalks. There were an extensive number of utility boxes and structures within the improvement areas, many of which required nonstandard designs and coordination with the utility owners. The project also included reconstruction of a portion of a parking garage to allow for compliant pedestrian facilities into the garage and across the driveway. • Project Engineer | Fulton Road Widening PA/ED (Guerneville Road to Piner Road) | Santa Rosa, CA | Responsible for utilities engineering, including coordination, identification, location and relo- cation planning for the design phase of the widening of this major arterial roadway. Jeremy Schmal, PE Project Manager Education • Caltrans Local Assistance Training, Resident Engineers Academy • Construction Inspection of Traffic Signals, ITS Berkeley • Caltrans Local Assistance Training, Federal Aid • ArcGIS Certification, CSU Fresno Extension Licenses/Registration Civil Engineer, CA #87192 Memberships/Affiliations • American Society of Civil Engineers • Association of Environmental Professionals, Central California Section, Past Vice-President • Institute of Traffic Engineers Page 508 of 585 48 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S Matt Kennedy is a licensed civil and traffic engineer with 17 years of experience in traffic/transportation, utility systems and sustainable civil engineering. He is adept in the design and management of a broad range of civil infrastructure projects, including roadways, storm drainage and Low Impact Development (LID), traffic signals, pedestrian and bicy- cle facilities, striping and signing, retaining walls, water and wastewater conveyance systems, civil site design, and traffic control. Matt’s experi- ence also includes a broad range of planning, modeling, and analysis capabilities, including utility master planning, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, water and wastewater process design, traffic and parking studies, circulation studies, and analysis and timing of signals. He is also experienced in land surveying and construction management. Project Experience • Project Manager | Ukiah Streetscape and Road Diet | Ukiah, CA | Managed the federally, state and locally funded project reduced the travel lanes, improving parking and pedestrian improvements, adding landscaping and rebuilding the roadway, which includes sections of old concrete Highway 101 for a half mile of State Street. The project also includes modification of three traffic signals and sewer and water main replacements. • Project Manager/Construction Manager | Redwood Business Park Transportation Improvements | Ukiah, CA | The project involved the reconstruction of an existing roadway system in a developing business park and retail area of the City. The purpose of the project is to repair a large section of under-designed and failed pavement, widen and improve roadways to accommodate increases in traffic and heavy trucks associated with planned future commer- cial and retail developments, and other associated improvements. Elements of the project include pavement design and roadway reconstruction for additional heavy truck traffic, new and modified traffic signals to accommodate current and future increases in traffic volumes, the addition of lanes and changes in roadway geometry to efficiently handle higher volumes of traffic and larger vehicles, extensions of roadways and utilities to serve new commercial devel- opment areas, and the addition of innovative LID storm water quality systems using Tire Derived Aggregate (TDA). The use of TDA in the project diverted over 35,000 used tires from landfills. The project was recognized by ACEC and ASCE with numerous awards for client service and design innovation. • Traffic and Civil Engineer | East Washington Pedestrian Crossing | Petaluma, CA | The purpose of the project is to enhance pedestrian visibility, crossing safety and ADA accessibility at East Washington Street on the Petaluma Ring Trail. The project includes a high-visibility overhead warning system (flashing yellow beacons and LED blankout sign), a pedestrian corral at the mid-point of the crossing, new sidewalks along East Washington Street, utility trench- ing, a new PG&E service, ADA curb ramps with truncated dome detectable warning panels, and striping and singing. GHD designed the new overhead warning system using standard details and equip- ment from Caltrans, including foundations, poles, mast arms, and one luminaire for safety lighting. New sidewalks provide connectivity for bicyclists and pedestrians between the Ring Trail on Skyranch Road and East Washington Street. The project was completed on-schedule and under budget. In additional to full design services, GHD provided construction support services during construction and worked with City staff and the contractor. Matt Kennedy, PE, TE Principal-in-Charge Education • MS, Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 2003 • BS, Environmental Resources Engineering, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 2001 Licenses/Registration • Civil Engineer, CA #68304, OR #83450, NV #24172, NM #23032, HI #18171, GU #1337, CNMI #528 • Traffic Engineer, CA #2385 • Envision™ Sustainability Professional (ENV SP); Control Manager, USACE/ NAVFAC Certified Design and Construction Quality • Certificate, Resident Engineer, California Department of Transportation • Technologist, Construction Documents, Construction Specifications Institute Memberships/Affiliations • American Society of Civil Engineers • American Water Works Association • Society of American Military Engineers Page 509 of 585 AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 49 Matt Wargula is a licensed civil engineer with over 18 years of profes- sional experience. He has planning, design and construction experience in traffic/transportation, site development, hydrology, hydraulics, and water resources projects. Matt is proficient in the design and construc- tion of a variety of civil infrastructure projects, including traffic signals, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, striping and signing plans, site develop- ment, storm water management plans, underground utilities, water pipe- lines and pump stations, and traffic control systems for construction. He regularly provides internal QA/QC review for GHD’s Transportation Team. Matt is engaged in the design of civil engineering infrastructure and has prepared planning level studies and reports, design reports, technical memoranda and construction documents, including plans, specifica- tions and construction estimates, for various projects. Project Experience • Traffic Engineer | Healdsburg Five-Way Intersection | Healdsburg, CA | Provided design for the project, which is a vital component of the Central Healdsburg Avenue Plan, a comprehen- sive gateway, streetscape, and utility improvement project. The Five- Way Roundabout Design was comprised of the reconstruction of the existing five-legged signalized intersection with a single-lane modern roundabout. Increasing the design complexity, an at-grade heavy rail crossing traverses through the center of the intersection. • Project Engineer | Willits Main Street Corridor Enhancement Plan | Willits, CA | GHD supported the plan for the relinquishment of former US 101 from Caltrans to the City, in preparation of the open- ing of the “Willits Bypass.” GHD participated in the public outreach process that included a week long design charrette, open house, focus group/stakeholder meetings, walking tours, and vetting of potential design solutions to improve the Main Street corridor envi- ronment. These enhancements included buffered bike lane linkages, traffic calming treatments, intersection geometric safety enhance- ments, enhanced crosswalks, bulb-outs and landscaping, lighting, gateway treatments, streetscape finishes and wayfinding signage. • Project Manager | Petaluma Complete Streets Project | Petaluma, CA | Managed this federally funded complete streets project which included approximately 4,500 linear feet of Lakeville Street and East D Street. Within the existing right-of-way, the travel lane widths were reduced to incorporate either 5- to 6-foot enhanced green bike lanes or shared lane facilities throughout the project limits, along with several pedestrian enhancements, including sidewalk gap closures, widened sidewalks, upgraded curb ramps, high visibility crossings with advanced warning signage and a rect- angular rapid flashing beacon system installation at the Copeland Street/D Street intersection (near transit center). • Project Manager |Jaguar Way/Windsor Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project | Town of Windsor, CA | Managed this federally funded project that included street widening at the approach to the intersection of Windsor Road and Jaguar Way, installation of a new traffic signal system, connection of Class II bike lanes, Class II bike lane enhancements (green lanes), side- walk gap closure, new street lighting and retrofit of existing lighting for LED luminaires, street widening for on-street parking and right- turn pocket into Windsor High School, upgrade of pedestrian curb ramps, pavement rehabilitation, striping and signage. Project also included coordination with Sonoma Transit for bus stop enhance- ments and permanent relocations. Matt Wargula, PE, TE, QSD/QSP, LEED AP Quality Assurance / Quality Control Education BS, Civil Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 2003 Licenses/Registration • Civil Engineer, CA #76103 • Traffic Engineer, CA #2749 • Qualified SWPPP Developer/ Practitioner #01146 • LEED® AP Memberships/Affiliations • American Society of Civil Engineers, Past President, Redwood Empire Branch • Institute of Transportation Engineers • Order of the Engineer Page 510 of 585 50 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S Pat Tortora has 25 years of experience in providing planning, design, and construction engineering solutions to public and private clients with an emphasis on K 12 schools, commercial, and industrial site design in collaboration with multi disciplinary teams. For school districts, municipal entities, and governmental organizations throughout the Portland Metro Area, SE Washington, California, and Guam, Pat has overseen civil site infrastructure improvements that attend to stormwater quality concerns, utility infrastructure, pedestrian and vehicular safety measures, and sustainably minded, comprehensive sewer, water, and civil site work. Project Experience • Engineering Lead | Ukiah Streetscape and Road Diet | Ukiah, CA | Served as Civil Engineer for this project, currently under construction, which included the design of new streetscape and util- ity improvements along State Street from Mill Street to Henry Street, approximately 9 city blocks. The project also includes improvements on Perkins Street and Standley Street from School Street to Main Street. Specific components of the project include the following: sidewalk-widening, construction of curb ramps and bulb outs, relocation of drain inlets and pipes, construction of LID stormwater enhancement features, installation of new streetlights, enhanced pedestrian crossings with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and stamped asphalt crosswalks, and installation of street furniture. A new traffic control signal will be installed at Mill Street, Perkins Street and Standley Street. • Project Manager | The Great Redwood Trail (Ukiah Rail-Trail Phases 1, 2, and 3) | Ukiah, CA | Responsible for the delivery of construction ready PS&Es for three phases of the Great Redwood Trail. GHD is the design engineer for this Class I trail along North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA) Railroad Corridor. The trail provides pedestrians and cyclists with safe access to amenities such as parks, a museum, and a hospital. In 2015, the first phase was the first Rail-with-Trail project to be designed and constructed in NCRA ROW in Mendocino County. The second two phases were constructed the winter of 2019. GHD provided a full suite of envi- ronmental, engineering, and permitting services, as well as SWPPP preparation. Phase 2 and 3 contains two bridges, one over Doolin Creek and one over Orr Creek to allow emergency vehicles to access all portions of the trail from a single direction. • Project Engineer | Downtown Revitalization | Independence, OR | Led the production of the construction documents and specifica- tions for the reconstruction of 1,100 feet of South Main Street from B Street to D Street. Work was completed as part of a historic resto- ration and included streetscape and urban design. Design included the replacement of water and stormwater pipelines. Storm water design required drainage basin analysis, downstream system analy- sis, and hydraulic design of the piping system. • Lead Civil Engineer | Main Street/SR1 Realignment | Fort Bragg, CA | Responsible for the design on the Main Street Realignment Project (between Oak Street and Pine Street). Improvements included the relocation of the existing merge/drop lanes; the addition of a bike lane; the addition of medians; the replacement of the exist- ing cobra-head style street lights with new decorative street lights; the addition of right and left hand turn lanes at various intersections; decorative bulb outs, curb ramps, and crosswalks; and accessibility improvements to driveways and sidewalks. Patrick Tortora, PE, LEED AP Engineering Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2013 Licenses/Registration • Civil Engineer, CA #80067, WA #42517, OR #50400, ID #17342, GU #1873 • LEED Accredited Professional Memberships/Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers Page 511 of 585 AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 51 Frank Penry has 25 years of experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering design. He has managed numerous transportation studies and design projects over the years, from small development impact studies to major roadway improvements. Frank has served as the City Traffic Engineer for the Cities of Petaluma, Cotati, Sonoma, and Fortuna, providing the administration and development of Municipal Traffic Engineering Programs. He is well-versed in a wide range of traffic engineering design standards and encroachment requirements, traffic signals, roundabouts, traffic calming and streetscapes, construction traf- fic handling, detour, and control plans for a variety of civil engineering projects. Project Experience • Traffic Engineering Lead | Ukiah Streetscape and Road Diet | Ukiah, CA | Responsible for traffic engineering for this federally, state and locally funded project includes a road diet through downtown. The project reduced travel lanes, improving parking and pedestrian improvements, added landscaping and rebuilding the roadway. • Senior Traffic Engineer | Five-Way Intersection Improvements | Healdsburg, CA | Responsible for public outreach, design devel- opment, and project approval for the downtown five-way intersec- tion roundabout. While the project included significant investment in public utility infrastructure throughout the Central Healdsburg Redevelopment Area, the plan to include a roundabout had been developed over several years. The City of Healdsburg had been considering a roundabout at the five-leg intersection of Healdsburg Avenue/Mill Street-Vine Street, along with the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit/Northwestern Pacific Rail at-grade crossing for several years prior to the redevelopment plan. Improvements at the inter- section were pursued because of issues related to traffic congestion and inadequate signal timing with respect to pedestrian crossings. • Project Traffic Engineer | Petaluma Blvd TLC/Streetscape and Pedestrian Improvement Project | Petaluma, CA | Responsible for the project study and feasibility analysis, which were critical to iden- tifying the Road Diet as a viable project alternative. Also responsible for conceptual layout and design of roadway geometric reconfigu- ration (road-diet), streetscape, and pedestrian elements, including striping, signing, parking, landscaping, in-roadway warning lights, traffic signal modifications, street lighting, bulb-outs, ADA improve- ments, concrete sidewalk, bikeways, roadway striping, and traffic control. The success of the initial project phase resulted in secur- ing additional funds to extend the Road Diet through the Historic Downtown with Transportation for Livable Communities. • Senior Traffic Engineer | Stony Point Road Improvement | Santa Rosa, CA | Responsible for the design of four traffic signals along the 1.25-mile roadway widening of Stony Point Road. The project consisted of utility and drainage improvements, Rule 20A utility undergrounding, landscaping, and electrical improvements. This is a fully funded redevelopment project to help revive the southwest entry into the City while creating local jobs and stimulating the economy. • Senior Traffic Engineer | Snyder Lane Roadway Widening | Rohnert Park, CA | Responsible for traffic analysis, signal, signing and striping, and coordination of street lighting luminaires layout for a roadway widening and utility undergrounding project adjacent to commercial, residential, and park area. Also developed new and modified signalized improvements along the corridor, including improved access to Rancho Cotati High School. Frank Penry, PE, TE, PTOE Traffic Signals/Signing, Striping/Traffic Engineer Education BS, Civil Engineering, Chico State University, Chico, CA Licenses/Registration • Civil Engineer, CA #62785, OR #84632 • Traffic Engineer, CA #2304 • Professional Traffic Operations Engineer, CA #1603 Memberships/Affiliations • American Society of Civil Engineers, Redwood Empire Section • Institute of Transportation Engineers, San Francisco Bay Area Section, Vice President • Registered Traffic Engineers of America • American Public Works Association Page 512 of 585 52 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S Dillon Morra has more than 12 years of experience working on diverse civil design and remediation projects. His project experience ranges from site grading and drainage, erosion and sediment control, sewer, storm water, to water/waste water system design. He has prepared and reviewed construction document packages, fee estimates, as well as developed scopes of work for surveying, geotechnical, and environmen- tal sampling and analysis. Dillon has applied codes and regulations to his work and is familiar with California storm water permits, International Building Code, California Code of Regulations, ASCE 7, and ASTM standards. Project Experience • Civil Utilities Lead | P-1910 Magazine and Inert Storage Facility | Ridgecrest, CA | Managed the design of site utilities for this design build project. Coordinated all work with other disciplines. Ensured the design met NAVFAC design standards. • Project Manager | Pescadero High School Water Main Extension | Pescadero, CA | Design for the extension of an existing water system to serve an existing high school and new fire station. Project includes survey, geotechnical investigation, hydraulic analy- sis, and design of 1.3-miles of new water main. Construction cost estimated at $2M and paid for by the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). Project was managed by University Enterprises, Inc., designed in accordance with San Mateo County requirements, and coordinated and reviewed by multiple stakeholders. • Project Manager | Transit Hub Utilities Project | Berkeley, CA | Design for the extension of an existing water system to serve an existing high school and new fire station. Project includes survey, geotechnical investigation, hydraulic analysis, and design of 1.3-miles of new water main. Construction cost estimated at $2M and paid for by the DWSRF. Project was managed by University Enterprises, Inc., designed in accordance with San Mateo County requirements, and coordinated and reviewed by multiple stakeholders. • Design Lead | Southeast Outfall Islais Creek Crossing Replacement | San Francisco, CA | Dual 54-inch HDPE treated effluent pipelines under San Francisco Bay. Performing QA/QC review of construction phasing, construction sequencing, and construction schedules. Assisting the PM with the review process, meetings with stakeholders, and technical portions of CEQA permitting. • Project Engineer | El Camino Real and Malcolm Avenue Improvements| Belmont, CA | Project Engineer for the replacement of 3,600 linear feet of 8-inch water main along Caltrans right-of-way. Developed and delivered exemption request, developed and deliv- ered Encroachment Permit application, and developed bid items, estimate, and bid package. *Work performed with other firm. • Construction Manager | Treated Water Pump Station and Transmission Pipeline | Half Moon Bay, CA | Construction Manager for 3,300-feet of 12-inch ductile iron force main and asso- ciated pump station. Coordinated submittals between the Engineer and Contractor. Other responsibilities included directing field inspector, communicating schedule updates with the client, leading progress meetings, and reviewing partial payment requests. *Work performed with other firm. Dillon Morra, PE, QSD Utility Engineering Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Long Beach, CA Licenses/Registration Civil Engineer, CA #79186 Trainings Neutral Evaluator, Florida, 2008 Page 513 of 585 AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 53 Kat Harvey’s attention to detail and organizational skills give clients confidence that their project will stay on track for schedule and budget. She has 10 years of experience in transportation design, land develop- ment, stormwater permitting and design, and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) development. Kat has acted as project manager and project engineer on numerous large public works improve- ment and private projects. She enjoys finding innovative solutions utiliz- ing the latest technological advances for clients to keep up with ever-changing regulations. Project Experience • Project Engineer | Ukiah Streetscape and Road Diet | Ukiah, CA | Responsible for design support of this roadway project, design of the LID and drainage features. As part of the LID design, respon- sible for ensuring compliance with the State MS4 Phase I permit. The project included a road diet through Downtown Ukiah, reducing the travel lanes, improving parking and pedestrian improvements, adding landscaping, and rebuilding the roadway, which includes sections of old concrete Highway 101 for a half mile of State Street. The project also included modification of three traffic signals and sewer and water main replacements. • Assistant Project Manager/Lead Civil Engineer | Fulton Road Widening | Santa Rosa, CA | Responsible for managing all aspects of this road widening project, including leading team members through design and coordinating deliverables with City staff. Also responsible for the production of construction documents, including PS&E and the design of the LID improvements. This project incor- porated road widening for approximately one mile of Fulton Road through partially built-out areas, utilizing as much existing infrastruc- ture as possible, and the addition of ADA compliant sidewalks and pedestrian ramps. The project also included the extension of a box culvert, several retaining walls and right of way acquisition. • Project Engineer/Lead Designer | Devlin Road Segment H and Vine Trail Extension | American Canyon, CA | Responsible for design of the roadway project through a greenfield in the City of American Canyon. The nearly one-mile-long new roadway included design of the extension of the Vine Trail, which is a multi-use, master planned trail through Napa County. It also included right of way acquisition, design of a new box culvert, utility design and coordina- tion, and LID stormwater solutions, such as bioretention. The road- way cuts through areas of wetlands which required mitigations and coordination with multiple government agencies. • Project Engineer | Windsor River Road/Windsor Road Intersection Improvements and Multi-Use Path Connector | Windsor, CA | Responsible for design of the LID improvements and coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to estab- lish criteria for design exceptions and offset measures for stormwater compliance. Project involves redesign of an existing signalized inter- section to a four-leg roundabout, as well as improvements to wet and dry utilities. The project will be required to comply with current stormwater regulations under the State’s MS4 Phase I permit. • Project Engineer | Stockrest Springs Roundabout | Truckee, CA | Responsible for the design of the storm drain and LID features and preparation of the associated calculations for the PS&E, which includes modifying the intersection into a roundabout with pedes- trian and bicycle facilities, water quality features, underground drain- age facilities, and utility coordination. Kat Harvey, PE, QSD/QSP LID Design Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA Licenses/Registration • Civil Engineer, CA #84798 • Qualified SWPPP Developer/ Practitioner #25793 Memberships/Affiliations • Construction Specification Institute • American Society of Civil Engineers • American Public Works Association • National Society of Professional Engineers • South & West Area Business Association • LSR XXV, Leadership, Santa Rosa Page 514 of 585 54 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S Brian Bacciarini has 18 years of experience with GHD specializing in environmental planning, CEQA/NEPA compliance, natural resource agency permitting, stormwater management, and hazardous materials sampling and reporting. He has played a primary role in the planning, research, development, and implementation of numerous environmental reviews for a wide spectrum of municipal, federal and regional clients. He has extensive experience and relationships with regulators and federal funding program managers, including compliance with Caltrans’ Local Assistance Procedures for transport projects. Brian’s roadway project experience includes roadway rehabilitations, roundabouts, inter- section signalization, bridges, transit stations, pedestrian facilities, utility undergrounding, and overall complete street improvements. Project Experience • Project Planner | Healdsburg Five-Way Roundabout and Culvert Improvements | Healdsburg, CA | Assisting with the resource agency permitting (US Army Corps, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Fish & Wildlife), CEQA documentation (within the scope of the Programmatic Document), and construction management support for the project. • CEQA Project Manager | Fulton Road Widening Improvement | Santa Rosa, CA | Served as the CEQA Project Manager for the preliminary engineering design phase of the project. The project includes roadway widening, new vehicle travel lanes, bicycle lanes, sidewalks, bioretention areas, bus stops, landscaping, utility relo- cations, stormwater facilities, and property acquisitions and ease- ments. Managed the completion of a CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project, which included technical studies for traffic, wetlands, cultural resources, and roadway traffic noise. Also managing permitting services for the project, which will include obtainment of a Section 404 Nationwide Permit; 401 Water Quality Certification; and Section 2081 Incidental Take Permit. • NEPA Project Manager | East Cotati Avenue Road Rehab Project | Cotati, CA | Managed the CEQA and NEPA review of this federally funded street rehabilitation project. The project includes pavement rehabilitation, new ADA accessible concrete curb ramps, sidewalks, curb and gutter, low impact development bioretention areas for storm water, electrical conduit extensions, traffic signal detector loop replacement, bicycle striping, and tree planting. Oversaw the completion of the Preliminary Environmental Study and project-specific technical studies in support of a categorical exclusion finding. This included completion of technical studies for biological resources, hazardous materials, right-of-way take, traffic, water quality, Section 4f concurrence, and equipment staging. Brian also assisted the City with preparing the CEQA documentation for the project, including coordination with the City and California Native American tribes on the Assembly Bill 52 consultation process. • NEPA Project Manager | City of Sonoma Various Streets and Roads | Sonoma, CA | Assisted with the NEPA review of this feder- ally funded street rehabilitation project. The project included roadway restriping, repairing localized pavement failures, pavement overlay, Class II bike lanes, adjusting utility structures to grade, upgrad- ing curb ramps for ADA compliance, and installation of guardrails. Oversaw the completion of technical studies in support of a cate- gorical exclusion finding. Caltrans environmental clearance was provided for the project in October 2016. Brian Bacciarini NEPA/CEQA Compliance Lead Education BS, Environmental Studies, Sonoma State University, Sonoma, CA, 2001 Certifications • Certified, Construction Document Technician (CSI) • Certified, OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER • Certificate of Completion • OSHA 8-Hour Annual HAZWOPER, Certified, Construction Site Planning and Management Relevant Experience • Interchange Projects • Roadway/Corridor Projects • Grant/Funding Assistance • Public Relations/Outreach Page 515 of 585 AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 55 As Project Manager, Jake Tobias will be the main point of contact for the prime consultant and coordinate the day-to-day needs of the project. He is a landscape architect and urban designer in WRT’s San Francisco office. With over 20 years of experience, his work includes design at the full range of scales from master planning to detail design. He is inter- ested in incorporating green infrastructure, ecological design principles and community participation in the design process. Jake’s expertise in streetscape design and familiarity with the City and project area will provide a firm base of knowledge for the management and design of this project. Project Experience • Ukiah Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet, & Utilities Project – Phase 1 | Ukiah, CA • Napa Downtown Pedestrian Corridors | Napa, CA • Windsor River Road/Windsor Road Improvements | Windsor, CA • Farmers Lane Extension | Santa Rosa, CA • Miller Avenue Streetscape Implementation | Mill Valley, CA* • Golf Club Road/Old Quarry Road Improvements & Roundabout | Pleasant Hill, CA • Cloverdale Boulevard Streetscape | Cloverdale, CA • Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Corridor Rehabilitation | Greenbrae, CA • Wilson Avenue Corridor Study & Detail Design | Vallejo, CA • Contra Costa Boulevard Streetscape Design | Pleasant Hill, CA • San Pablo Avenue Complete Street Project | Richmond and San Pablo, CA • UC Davis South Entry Road | Davis, CA • Richmond Memorial Civic Center Plaza | Richmond, CA* *Project Award Engagement • ASLA Northern California Chapter Executive Committee Director, 2014-2016 • UC Berkeley Extension, Advanced Landscape Design Studio Instructor, 2007-2014 • California Landscape Architect Registration Exam Preparation Instructor, 2003-2013 • UC Berkeley, Landscape Architectural Graphics Guest Instructor, 2000 • Bay Friendly Landscape Course and Conference Jake Tobias, ASLA, LEED AP Landscape Architecture Lead Education • Master of Landscape Architecture, University of California, Berkeley • Bachelor of Arts, Macalester College, Saint Paul, MN Licenses/Registration • Landscape Architect, CA #4890 • American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) • US Green Building Council LEED Accredited Professional Awards • Richmond Memorial Civic Center, CPFS Preservation Design Award, 2010 • Richmond Memorial Civic Center, ABAG Building a Better Bay Area: Urban Design, 2010 • San Francisco State University Master Plan; ASLA Northern California Chapter Merit Award (Planning), 2009 Page 516 of 585 56 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S Tony Cinquini, Chief Financial Officer at Cinquini & Passarino, Inc. is a licensed Professional Engineer and licensed Professional Land Surveyor with the State of California with over 20 years of experience in the professions of civil engineering and land surveying. His experience in project management, topographic surveys, right of way surveys, legal description and plat preparation, construction surveys, and land survey technology including laser scanning and unmanned aerial systems enhances his ability to effectively work on infrastructure improvements, redevelopment and development projects, roadway realignments, and utility rehabilitation projects. Project Experience • Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager | Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Project | Ukiah, CA | Overseeing the detailed topographic and right-of-way mapping of over 4,500 feet of downtown streets for the complex utility improvement and streetscape improvement project. • Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager | Keiser Avenue Reconstruction Project | Rohnert Park, CA | Overseeing the detailed topographic mapping and right of way engineering for the reconstruction of approximately 4,300 feet of Keiser Avenue from Snyder Lane to Petaluma Hill Road. Project includes right of way determination, identification of right of way needs and preparation of legal descriptions and plats for right of way acquisition. • Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager | Snyder Lane Rehabilitation | Rohnert Park, CA | Overseeing the detailed topo- graphic mapping and right of way engineering for the reconstruction of approximately 4,300 feet of Snyder Lane from Keiser Avenue to Moura Lane. Project included retracement of historic mapping to compile the project’s right of way. • Principal-in-Charge/Chief Remote Pilot | Mirabel Flood Damage sUAS Imagery | Sonoma County, CA | Responsible for planning the preflight, executing the drone flight and post processing the aerial imager for the recently complete Mirabel Fish Screen and Fish Ladder Replacement for the Westside Water Education Center. We also mapped portions of the Russian River. Imagery was tiled for ease of use and deliverables included georeferenced images and point clouds files. • Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager | City of Santa Rosa Parks ADA Upgrade | Santa Rosa, CA | Overseeing the detailed topographic mapping for ADA upgrades to Tanglewood Park and Skyhawk Park. Existing pathways were cross sectioned at interval’s ranging from 10 to 25 feet to accurately depict the existing longitudi- nal slopes and cross slopes of the existing path of travel. • Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager | Right of Way Acquisition Documents, Steele Lane to Jennings Avenue | Santa Rosa, CA | Coordinated with City Staff for the preparation of a sanitary sewer easement over a portion of Sonoma County Water Agency property for the City’s new sewer. Project included topographic mapping, boundary line determination and record research. Tony Cinquini, PLS Topographic & Right of Way Survey Lead Education BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico, 1998 Licenses/Registration • Civil Engineer, CA #62341 • Professional Land Surveyor, CA #8614 • FAA Remote Pilot for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems • Cert, #3906702 • Construction Documents Technologist, Construction Specifications Institute Memberships/Affiliations • American Society of Civil Engineers, San Francisco Section Past-President • American Council of Engineering Companies California (ACEC-CA), North Coast Chapter • California Land Surveyors Association Page 517 of 585 AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S GHD | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | 57 Marc Ceccarelli joined Associated Right of Way Services, Inc., in 2017. As an Acquisition Consultant, Marc’s responsibilities include communi- cations and negotiations with property owners, preparation of first writ- ten offer documents, administrative settlements, escrow instructions and project correspondence. He actively negotiates with property owners and prepares condemnation documents and provides the review of title documents. Prior to joining AR/WS, Marc served as an Associate Right of Way Agent with the California Department of Transportation. He was responsible for the appraisal and acquisition of property required for transportation purposes and clearance of improvements prior to construction and disposition of property. He oversaw airspace rights to ensure conformity, appraisals, negotiations, and contract conception. Prior to his position with the California Department of Transportation, Marc worked as an Environmental Planner with the Delta Project Commission. He reviewed real estate development plans to ensure compliance within state and local regulations and created economic sustainability plans through focus on various opportunities in the area. Project Experience • Acquisition | Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Project | Ukiah, CA | This project included streetscape improve- ments in downtown Ukiah including improvements to sidewalks, crossings, and traffic circulation. The project also consists of a road diet between Henry Street and Mill Street, reducing State Street from two travel lanes to one in each direction, and adding a two-way left-turn lane. AR/WS obtained Permits to Enter and Construct (PTECs) on 71 parcels on an expedited schedule. Marc served as the primary right of way agent for the project, acquiring the vast majority of the PTECs. He also attended a project community infor- mational meeting. After the initial outreach consisting of primarily mail, email and phone contacts, Marc went door-to-door to the remaining properties to solicit PTECs which resulted in numerous additional signed agreements. • Valuation & Acquisition | Silverado Trail Road MOM 18.02 Slope Repairs | Napa County, CA | Prepared a waiver valuation for an easement needed for internal support of an embankment slope. He also acquired the easement utilizing the single agent approach to acquisition. • Acquisition | SR 84 Widening and SR 84/I-680 Interchange Improvements Project | Alameda County, CA | AR/WS is provid- ing full-service right of way services for this project, which intends to alleviate traffic congestion, and improve operations, safety and bicy- cle access on SR-84 and the SR-84/I-680 interchange. The project includes acquisition from 11 owners. To date agreements have been reached with 10 owners. • Acquisition | Corral Hollow Widening Project | Tracy, CA | The Corral Hollow Road widening project includes partial acquisitions along the frontages of over 50 parcels. Marc prepared written offer packages and provided acquisition services on 33 properties. Marc also prepared Waiver Valuations for 14 parcels on this proj- ect, acquiring property rights utilizing the single-agent approach to acquisition. The right of way acquisition for this project is near- ing completion, with 90% of the parcels having been successfully acquired through negotiation. Marc Ceccarell Right of Way Appraisal/ Acquisition Lead Education • MBA, Finance and Accounting, University of California, Davis • BA, Philosophy, University of California, Davis Licenses/Registration • Department Real Estate Salesperson’s License, CA #01900617 • Notary Public Commission, CA #2248498 Memberships/Affiliations International Right of Way Association Page 518 of 585 58 | Proposal for City of Ukiah: Downtown Streetscape, Road Diet & Utilities Project - Phase 2 | GHD AP P E N D I X : RE S U M E S Kevin Stankiewicz is a senior traffic engineer with 21 years of experience involving traffic operation analyses, traffic simulations, traffic forecasting, coordinated signal timing, signal design, signing and striping plans, construction traffic control and intelligent transportation systems design. He has been the traffic lead on corridor studies and large development traffic impact studies. Kevin has successfully managed projects to be completed on time, on budget and meeting quality standards. He also has a track record of preparing PA/ED documents, microscopic traffic simulation calibration reports, traffic sections for the Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Reports, and traffic impact studies that have been accepted by the client. Project Experience • Traffic Engineer | 20th Street SE BAT Lane | Lake Stevens, WA | Led the traffic operations microscopic simulation analysis in SimTraffic and the writing of the Traffic Analysis Report for the addi- tion of a westbound High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV), and Business Access and Transit (BAT) lane. Met calibration targets by correct replication of the long westbound queue. Also determined queue storage lengths needed for left turns to guide the design. The proj- ect goal was to provide an uncongested westbound lane so that transit vehicles and high occupancy vehicles can bypass the long westbound queues in the AM peak period. • Traffic Engineer | I-405 Express Toll Lanes Between Bellevue and Lynnwood | Bothell, WA | Prepared the Intersection Control Evaluation report for the I-405/SR 522 interchange improvements. The ICE evaluated standard intersections and a diverging diamond interchange design. The proposed designs added three traffic signals in order to provide SR 522 access to the I-405 median Express Lane ramps, posing a challenge to coordinate the closely spaced signals to maximize the intersection throughput capacity. Successfully coordinated the interchange signals for both alternative designs, performing the analysis in VISSIM to more accurately model the operations of a diverging diamond configuration. The standard intersection design has been incorporated into the corridor project. • Traffic Engineer | Highway 99 Sea-to-Sky Corridor Study | Squamish & Whistler, BC, Canada | Led the traffic operations analysis and directed the coding of a VISSIM model of the entire Highway 99 corridor from West Vancouver to Whistler to accu- rately reflect the conditions of combined ski and commute traf- fic. A VISSIM model was developed to address both signals and interchanges in the corridor, passing sections, and multiple hours of analysis need for the 83-mile-long corridor. Also calibrated the simulation model to FHWA targets and modified the corridor traffic simulation model with three year traffic projections. Developed and tested an increased transit use scenario that eliminated the queuing by diverting enough person trips from auto to bus. • Traffic Engineer | Patullo Bridge Replacement | New Westminster & Surrey, BC, Canada | Performed Synchro inter- section analysis for new and modified signals on both approaches to the Patullo Bridge. Developed and tested several alternative intersection configurations using Synchro and examined alternate access to the Scott Road Skytrain Station, including new signal warrant analysis. Translink and the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation are planning to replace the old Patullo Bridge, poten- tially including improving the bridge approach structures. *All work listed performed with other firm. Kevin Stankiewicz, PE Traffic Advisory/Traffic QA/QC Education • BS, Civil Engineering, San Jose State University Licenses/Registration • Civil Engineer, CA #69878 Page 519 of 585 GHD is one of the world’s leading professional services companies operating in the global markets of water, energy and resources, environment, property and buildings, and transportation. We provide engineering, environmental, and construction services to private and public sector clients. Jeremy Schmal, PE jeremy.schmal@ghd.com T: +1 707 540 9612 www.ghd.com About GHD Page 520 of 585 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 521 of 585 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item No: 13.b. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2021-746 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Disposition Agreement with Danco Communities, a California Corporation, for a Mixed-Use Project to Include Commercial and Affordable Housing Units on Three City-Owned Parcels on 210 East Gobbi Street. DEPARTMENT: Economic Development PREPARED BY: Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager PRESENTER: Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. ENA COU No. 1819-195 Danco - 2019 2. Attachment 2_Draft DA Placeholder_030321 3. 13b Correspondence Received - Shannon Riley Summary: The City Council is asked to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Disposition Agreement with Danco Communities, a California corporation, for a mixed-use project to include commercial and affordable housing units on three City-owned parcels at 210 East Gobbi Street. Background: The City of Ukiah is one of only 29 jurisdictions (cities and counties) in the State of California that is meeting the State's housing mandates. This is primarily due to the City Council and Staff taking a proactive approach to sourcing housing in the city, often creating out-of-the-box solutions to address challenging situations. In 2019, the City of Ukiah purchased three parcels at 210 East Gobbi Street at Village Circle with the intention of soliciting development of a mixed-use project on the site. At the same time, the City entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (Attachment 1) with Danco Communities, the same developer responsible for the existing Summercreek Village affordable housing project on Village Circle. Staff and Danco Communities have been working through the predevelopment stages of this project and now have a draft Disposition Agreement for consideration. Discussion: Given the complexity of undertaking low and moderate-income developments and the unique features of the site, Staff believes the agreement with Danco Communities presents the best opportunity to achieve the City’s mixed-use development objective for the property. The draft Disposition Agreement includes language that, among other things, preserves the property for affordable housing and ensures the ongoing maintenance of the property. The project is proposed to include 17 studios, 17 one-bedroom apartments, 19 two-bedroom apartments, and 18 three-bedroom apartments, plus a community room and commercial units fronting Gobbi Street. The site is ideal for this project, as it is on a primary business corridor, conveniently located to services (grocery, drug stores, medical facilities, and major employment centers) and public transportation. Danco Communities proposes to purchase the property from the City at fair-market value with terms over 55 years, thereby preserving the project for affordable housing for the entire term. The affordable units shall be allocated at between 30-80% of area median income. Revenue from that purchase shall be placed back into Page 522 of 585 Page 2 of 2 Ukiah's Housing Trust Fund in order to further benefit future affordable housing projects. Danco Communities is working to meet nearing deadlines for the application for tax credits, an important financing tool for affordable housing projects. Staff is working with the developer on financing options and other details of the Disposition Agreement. Therefore, in the interest of meeting tax credit financing deadlines and expediting the further development of housing in Ukiah, Staff recommends the authorization for the City Manager to negotiate and execute the Disposition Agreement between Danco Communities and the City of Ukiah. At the time of agenda publication, the draft Disposition Agreement was not available (see Attachment 2, a placeholder); it will be provided in advance of the City Council meeting. Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Disposition Agreement with Danco Communities, a California corporation, for a mixed-use project to include commercial and affordable housing units on three City-owned parcels at 210 East Gobbi Street. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: 201819-195 COORDINATED WITH: Craig Schlatter, Director of Community Development and David Rapport, City Attorney Page 523 of 585 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 524 of 585 Page 525 of 585 Page 526 of 585 Page 527 of 585 Attachment 2 Draft Disposition Agreement This document was not available at the time of publication; it will be provided prior to the March 3, 2021 City Council meeting. Page 528 of 585 1 Kristine Lawler Subject:Attachment 2 for 13b (Disposition Agreement with Danco for Mixed-Use Project on East Gobbi) Attachments:Attachment 2_Disposition Agrmt Danco-City of Ukiah-2021_Draft.pdf From: Shannon Riley <sriley@cityofukiah.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:13 PM To: Doug Crane <dcrane@cityofukiah.com>; Jim Brown <jbrown@cityofukiah.com>; Juan Orozco <jorozco@cityofukiah.com>; Josefina Duenas <jduenas@cityofukiah.com>; Mari Rodin <mrodin@cityofukiah.com> Cc: Kristine Lawler <klawler@cityofukiah.com>; David Rapport <drapport@cityofukiah.com>; Sage Sangiacomo <ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com> Subject: Attachment 2 for 13b (Disposition Agreement with Danco for Mixed‐Use Project on East Gobbi) Hello, Attached, please find the draft disposition agreement associated with agenda item 13b. Please note that this is still a working document; recommended action on this item is to authorize the City Manager to execute and negotiate the final agreement. Thank you, Shannon Shannon Riley Deputy City Manager City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 w: (707) 467‐5793 Page 529 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 1 DISPOSITION AGREEMENT This Disposition Agreement (the “Agreement”), is entered into as of _______________, 2021 (“Effective Date”) by and between the City of Ukiah, a municipal corporation (the “City”), and Danco Communities, a California corporation (“Danco Communities” or the “Developer”) with reference to the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties: RECITALS A. These Recitals refer to and utilize certain capitalized terms defined in Article 1. The parties intend to refer to those definitions in connection with the use of capitalized terms in these Recitals. B. The City is the fee owner of certain unimproved real property located in the City, as more particularly described in the legal description in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Site”). The City selected Developer to be the developer of the Site. The parcels are designated with the following APNs:003-040-77; 003-040-78; 003-040-79. C. The City desires to convey the Site to Developer, together with rights, privileges, easements, servitudes and appurtenances thereto (the “Property” as further defined in Article 1) for development of approximately 70 dwelling units for lease to qualifying lower income tenants including one market rate manager’s unit and approximately 1,932 square feet of commercial space and associated onsite infrastructure such as, but not limited to, roads, driveways, parking areas, drainage facilities, and necessary facilities for the provision of utility services, including water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and solid waste collection (collectively, the “Improvements”, and together with the Property, the “Project”). D. The attached Exhibit B is a conceptual site plan for development of the Site (the “Conceptual Site Plan”) showing the general design and layout of the Project on the Site, and also showing the general location and boundaries of the Property. E. To facilitate the development of the Project, as reflected in this Agreement, the City has agreed to sell the Property to Developer as described in Article 2 below. As a condition of the sale, the Developer will maintain and operate the Development in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 33334.2 et seq., 33413(a) and 33413(b)(2)(A)(ii). Developer and the City will enter into a regulatory agreement (the “City Regulatory Agreement”) that will restrict one hundred percent (100%) of the units (except the manager’s unit) to lower-income households earning no more than eighty percent (80%) of area median income. F. The Developer intends to finance the remainder of the costs of development from certain loans, grants and investor capital contributions. In connection with such financing, the Developer will form a limited partnership (the “Partnership”) that has Developer or its affiliate as the administrative general partner. Upon or before the transfer of the Property to the Developer in accordance with this Agreement, the Developer intends to assign all of its rights, title, interest and obligations under this Agreement and its accompanying exhibits to the Partnership. Upon such assignment, all references to the Developer hereunder shall be a reference to the Partnership. Attachment 2 Page 530 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 2 G. The City has determined that the Developer has the necessary expertise, skill and ability to carry out the commitments set forth in this Agreement and that this Agreement is in the best interests of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Developer agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS Section 1.1 Definitions. In addition to the terms defined elsewhere in this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply throughout this Agreement. (a) “Actually known to the City” or “actual knowledge” means information possessed by a City officer or employee which has been reduced to writing and retained as a permanent record of the City. (b) “City Council” means the governing body of the City. (c) “City Deed of Trust” means the deed of trust in favor of the City by the Partnership, substantially in the form of Exhibit G attached hereto, to be recorded against the Property. (d) “City Grant Deed” means the grant deed of the Property to the Developer, substantially in the form of Exhibit D. (e) “City Note” means the promissory note issued by the Partnership to the City, substantially in the form of Exhibit F attached hereto. (f) “City Regulatory Agreement” means the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, substantially in the form of Exhibit C, to be recorded against the Property pursuant to Section 4.3, which shall impose income limitations on the tenants of the residential units in the Project. (g) “City” means the City of Ukiah. (h) “Construction Plans” means all construction documentation upon which the Developer and the Developer’s contractors shall rely in building each and every part of the Project (including landscaping, parking, and common areas) and a time schedule for construction. (i) “Developer” means Danco Communities, and its successors and assigns as permitted by this Agreement. (j) “Escrow” means the escrow established with the Escrow Company for the purpose of conveying the Property from the City to the Developer. (k) “Escrow Company” means Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. Page 531 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 3 (l) “Event of Default” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.3 or 6.4 as applicable. (m) “Hazardous Materials” means: (i) any “hazardous substance” as defined in Section 101(14) of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 1980 (“CERCLA”) (42 U.S.C. Section 9601(14)) or Section 25281(d) or 25316 of the California Health and Safety Code at such time; (ii) any “hazardous waste,” “infectious waste” or “hazardous material” as defined in Section 25117, 25117.5 or 25501(j) of the California Health and Safety Code at such time; (iii) any other waste, substance or material designated or regulated in any way as “toxic” or “hazardous” in the RCRA (42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.), CERCLA Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1521 et seq.), Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. Section 3000 (f) et seq.), Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. Section 2601 et seq.), Clear Air Act (42 U.S.C. Section 7401 et seq.), California Health and Safety Code (Section 25100 et seq., Section 3900 et seq.), or California Water Code (Section 1300 et seq.) at such time; and (iv) any additional wastes, substances or material which at such time are classified, considered or regulated as hazardous or toxic under any other present or future environmental or other similar laws relating to the Project. The term “Hazardous Materials” shall not include: (i) construction materials, gardening materials, household products, office supply products or janitorial supply products customarily used in the construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, or management of residential property or associated buildings and grounds, or typically used in household activities, or (ii) certain substances which may contain chemicals listed by the State of California pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sections 25249.8 et seq., which substances are commonly used by a significant portion of the population living within the region of the Project, including, but not limited to, alcoholic beverages, aspirin, and tobacco products. (n) “Hazardous Materials Laws” means all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and directives pertaining to Hazardous Materials in, on or under the Project or any portion thereof. (o) “Improvements” has the meaning in Recital C, to be managed in accordance with Exhibit C. (p) “Loan” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4 hereof. (q) “Management Agent” means Danco Communities or other management agent retained by Developer and approved by the City in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.14 to manage the Improvements. Page 532 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 4 (r) “Outside Date” means December 31, 2022[1]. (s) “Partnership” means the limited partnership formed to own the Project that will have Developer or its affiliate, as approved by the City Manager or his/her designee, as the administrative general partner. (t) “Project” has the meaning given in Recital C. (u) “Property” means the real property described in Paragraph C in the Recitals to be transferred to and developed by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement. (v) “Site” has the meaning defined in Recital B. (w) “Term” means the term of this Agreement, which shall consist of the period commencing on the date of executionEffective Date of this Agreement and continuing until the Outside Date or such longer term expressly set forth in Sections 4.1 and 5.1 hereof. (x) “Title Company” means Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. (y) “Transfer” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.1. Section 1.2 Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to and incorporated in the Agreement: Exhibit A: Legal Description of the Site Exhibit B: Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit C: Form of City Regulatory Agreement Exhibit D: Form of Grant Deed Exhibit E: Public Utilities Easement Exhibit F: Form of City Note Exhibit G: Form of City Deed of Trust ARTICLE 2 PREDISPOSITION REQUIREMENTS Section 2.1 Conditions Precedent to Disposition of Property. The requirements set forth in this Article 2 are conditions precedent to the City’s obligations to convey the Property to the Developer and make the Loan. Except as such date may be extended pursuant to Section 10.3, the City’s obligation to convey the Property to the Developer shall be subject to the satisfaction of all such conditions precedent prior to the Outside Date, unless a later date is mutually agreed upon by the City’s City Manager and the Developer. Additional conditions precedent to the City’s obligation to convey the Property are set forth in Sections 3.4 and 3.5. Section 2.2 Right of Entry to Perform Studies. (a) Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). At Developer’s expense, the City has certified the appropriate environmental review documents Page 533 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 5 required by CEQA and the certification has become final and not subject to judicial review. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to limit in any way the exercise of the City’s discretion in reviewing and certifying environmental documents or in exercising its authority to adopt or amend zoning ordinances, land use and subdivision approvals or other exercises of its local police powers. The Developer shall execute and comply with the City’s standard agreement requiring the Developer to indemnify and defend the City in any action to review, set aside or annul decisions made by the City to comply with CEQA or other land use or subdivision approvals made by the City in connection with the Developer’s pursuit of the Project. (b) Temporary Right of Entry. The City hereby grants a right of entry to the Property to the Developer and its agents, contractors and subcontractors for the sole purposes of performing a land survey, and conducting soils and other testing which require access to the Property (the “Temporary Right of Entry”). The Developer agrees at all times to keep the Property free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and clouds upon title that could result from the exercise of the Temporary Right of Entry. (c) Indemnity. Without limiting the generality of the indemnification set forth in Section 10.7, the Developer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless against all claims, including but not limited to mechanics liens and personal or property damage, arising from the entry of the Developer or its agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors onto the Property, or created as a result of the exercise of this Temporary Right of Entry. The Developer further agrees that all survey and testing work performed pursuant to this Temporary Right of Entry shall be made at the Developer’s sole cost. If Developer fails to purchase the Property from the City and this Agreement is terminated, Developer shall restore the Property to the condition it was in before the Developer performed any soils or other testing pursuant to Section 2.2(a). ARTICLE 3 DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY Section 3.1 Sale and Purchase of Property. Provided the pre-disposition requirements set forth in Article 2, and the additional closing conditions set forth in Section 3.4 and Article 4 have been satisfied, the City shall sell the Property to the Developer,, the Developer shall purchase the Property from the City, and the City shall make the Loan pursuant to the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement. Section 3.2 Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property shall be the fair market value of the Property (“Purchase Price”). Within 30 days of the execution of this Agreement Developer shall procure an appraisal of the Property by an MAI appraiser experienced in the valuation of real property for low-income multifamily use, and the Purchase Price hereunder shall equal such appraised value. The City shall loan the Purchase Price to the Developer (the “Loan”), which Loan shall be evidenced by a promissory note from the Partnership in favor of the City substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F (the “City Note”) having a term of 55 years and bearing simple interest at 3% which shall be repayable solely from, and to the extent of, Project net cash flow in the priority to be set forth in the Partnership’s Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Page 534 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 6 Agreement”). The Loan shall be secured by a subordinate deed of trust encumbering the Project substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G. . Section 3.3 Opening Escrow. To accomplish the purchase and sale of the Property from the City to the Developer, the parties shall establish the Escrow with the Escrow Company. The parties shall execute and deliver all written instructions to the Escrow Company to accomplish the terms hereof, which instructions shall be consistent with this Agreement. Section 3.4 Close of Escrow for the Property. Escrow for the conveyance of the Property shall close on a date mutually acceptable to the parties, prior to the Outside Date. The City shall convey the Property to the Developer by executing and delivering the City Grant Deed to the Developer, substantially in the form of Exhibit D. In addition to the conditions precedent to conveyance set forth in Article 2, the following conditions shall be satisfied prior to or concurrently with, and as conditions of, conveyance of the Property by the City to the Developer: (a) The Developer shall provide the City with certified copies of corporate authorizing resolutions authorizing the purchase of the Property. (b) The Developer shall have furnished the City with evidence of the insurance coverage meeting the general insurance requirements set forth in Section 6.8. (c) The City Regulatory Agreement and City Deed of Trust shall have been recorded against the Property, as liens subject only to the exceptions authorized by this Agreement. (d) The Developer shall have provided documentation to the City that Developer has commitments for all loans needed to construct the Project and a reservation of low income housing credits from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. (e) There shall exist no condition, event or act which would constitute a material breach or default under this Agreement or which, upon the giving of notice or the passage of time, or both, would constitute such a material breach or default. (f) All representations and warranties of the Developer contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the close of Escrow. Section 3.5 Condition of Title. (a) Upon the close of Escrow on the Property, the Developer or its permitted assignee hereunder shall have insurable fee title to the Property which shall be free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, clouds and conditions, rights of occupancy or possession, except: (i) applicable building and zoning laws and regulations; (ii) the provisions of this Agreement; Page 535 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 7 (iii) the provisions of the City Regulatory Agreement and City Deed of Trust; (iv) any lien for current taxes and assessments or taxes and assessments accruing subsequent to recordation of the City Grant Deed; (v) a public utility easement as described in the attached Exhibit E; and (vi) conditions, covenants, restrictions or easements shown as exceptions in the preliminary title reports for the Property approved by the Developer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Section 3.6 Condition of Property. (a) The City hereby represents and warrants that without any obligation to investigate and without having undertaken any such investigation, other than as reported in the Report of Findings for the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at 210 East Gobbi Street (APN 003-040-78-00), Ukiah, Mendocino County, dated July 19, 2019, a copy of which has been provided to Developer, it has no actual knowledge, that any release of hazardous substances has come to be located on or beneath the Property. (b) The City and the Developer understand and agree that the Property shall be accepted “as is” by the Developer and that the City shall in no way be responsible for demolition, site preparation or any other removal or replacement of improvements thereon. The Developer agrees to accept conveyance of the Property in its present condition “as is” and without representation or warranty from the City except as set forth in subsection (a) above, with respect to the condition of the Property including, but not limited to, the condition of the soil, presence of hazardous materials or contaminants, and all other physical characteristics. The Developer has performed and relies solely upon its own independent investigation concerning the physical condition of the Property or compliance of the Property with any statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations. (c) If after conveyance of the Property, the conditions of the Property are not in all respects entirely suitable for the use or uses to which the Property will be put as described in this Agreement, then it is the sole responsibility and obligation of the Developer to correct any soil conditions, correct any subsurface condition, correct any structural condition, demolish any improvements and otherwise put the Property in a condition suitable for the Project to be constructed pursuant to this Agreement. The Developer hereby waives any right to seek reimbursement or indemnification from the City of the Developer costs related to correction of any physical conditions on the Property except to the extent such costs are related to hazardous materials conditions actually known to the City but not disclosed pursuant to subsection (a) above. Section 3.7 Costs of Escrow and Closing. Ad valorem taxes, if any, shall be prorated as of the date of conveyance. All costs of closing the conveyance of the Property, Page 536 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 8 including but not limited to, the cost of title insurance, transfer tax, Title Company document preparation, recordation fees and the escrow fees of the Title Company and Escrow Company shall be paid by the Developer. ARTICLE 4 PREDEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS Section 4.1 Applicability. The conditions and obligations set forth in this Article 4 shall apply after conveyance of the Property until the date that the Project receives a final certificate of occupancy. Section 4.1Section 4.2 Final Development Plans. The Developer has applied or intends to apply for approval by the City of the development plans for the Project (the approved development plans shall be referred to as the “Final Development Plans”). Developer shall provide a copy of the Final Development Plans to the City. Section 4.2Section 4.3 Other Governmental Approvals. Promptly following City approval of the Final Development Plans, the Developer shall apply for and exercise diligent good faith efforts to obtain all other governmental approvals, including but not limited to any applicable use or site development and building permits necessary for development and operation of the Project.. Section 4.3Section 4.4 Construction Pursuant to Laws. The Developer shall cause all work performed in connection with the Project to be performed in compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of federal, state, county or municipal governments or agencies, including, if applicable, the prevailing wage provisions set forth in Section 5.11. Each element of the work shall proceed only after procurement of each permit, license, or other authorization that may be required for such element by any governmental agency having jurisdiction, and the Developer shall be responsible to the City for the procurement and maintenance thereof, as may be required of the Developer and all entities engaged in work on the Project. Section 4.4Section 4.5 Equal Opportunity. During the construction of the Project there shall be no discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, age, national origin or ancestry in the hiring, firing, promoting or demoting of any person engaged in the construction work. Section 4.5Section 4.6 Prevailing Wages. As material consideration to the City for entering into this Agreement, Developer agrees that, to the extent state law requires prevailing wages to be paid on the Project, Developer’s construction contract with its general contractor for the initial Improvements and any replacement improvements or any material alterations or new construction on the Premises shall require the general contractor (and all subcontractors) to pay the then general prevailing rate of per diem wages, in the locality where said work is being performed, as ascertained by the California Department of Industrial Relations for each craft, classification or type of worker employed to perform the work. The City acknowledges that the Page 537 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 9 Developer has determined that the payment of prevailing wages is not necessary for the construction of the Project. Section 4.6Section 4.7 Developer Fee. Developer shall be entitled to a developer fee in an amount not exceeding the maximum amount allowed by California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. Section 4.7Section 4.8 Management Agreement. Developer is hereby approved as the initial Management Agent for the Project. Upon request, Developer shall provide the City with a copy of the management agreement. ARTICLE 5 ONGOING DEVELOPER OBLIGATIONS Section 5.1 Applicability. The conditions and obligations set forth in this Article 5 shall apply after conveyance of the Property to the Developer throughout the term of the Regulatory Agreement, unless a shorter period of applicability is specified for a particular condition or obligation. Section 5.2 Use. The Developer hereby agrees that, for the entire term of the Regulatory Agreement, the Project will be used only for residential use consistent with the City Regulatory Agreement and the Final Development Plans. Section 5.3 Mandatory Language in All Subsequent Deeds, Leases and Contracts. (a) Basic Requirement. The Developer covenants by and for itself, its successors and assigns that, there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of a person or of a group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, age, national origin, ancestry or disability in the sale, lease, sublease transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Project nor shall the Developer or any person claiming under or through the Developer establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the Project. The foregoing covenant shall run with the land. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, with respect to familial status, Section 6.6(a) shall not be construed to apply to housing for older persons, as defined in Section 12955.9 of the California Government Code and shall not be construed to affect Sections 51.2, 51.3, 51.4, 51.10, 51.11 and 799.5 of the California Civil Code relating to housing for senior citizens. (b) Provisions In Conveyance Documents. All deeds, leases or contracts made or entered into by the Developer, its successors or assigns, as to any portion of the Property shall contain therein the following language: Page 538 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 10 (i) In Deeds: “Grantee herein covenants by and for itself, its successors and assigns that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of a person or of a group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, age, national origin, ancestry or disability in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the property herein conveyed nor shall the grantee or any person claiming under or through the grantee establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the property herein conveyed. The foregoing covenant shall run with the land.” (ii) In Leases: “The lessee herein covenants by and for the lessee and lessee’s heirs, personal representatives and assigns and all persons claiming under the lessee or through the lessee that this lease is made subject to the condition that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or of a group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, age, national origin, ancestry or disability in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein leased nor shall the lessee or any person claiming under or through the lessee establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the land herein leased.” (iii) In Contracts: “There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, age, national origin or ancestry or disability in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the property nor shall the transferee or any person claiming under or through the transferee establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the land.” Section 5.4 Hazardous Materials. (a) Certain Covenants and Agreements. The Developer hereby covenants and agrees that: (i) The Developer shall not knowingly permit the Project or any portion thereof to be a site for the use, generation, treatment, manufacture, storage, disposal or transportation of Hazardous Materials or otherwise knowingly permit the presence of Hazardous Materials in, on or under the Project. Page 539 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 11 (ii) The Developer shall keep and maintain the Project and each portion thereof in compliance with, and shall not cause or permit the Project or any portion thereof to be in violation of, any Hazardous Materials Laws. (iii) Upon receiving actual knowledge of the same, the Developer shall immediately advise the City in writing of: (A) any and all enforcement, cleanup, removal or other governmental or regulatory actions instituted, completed or threatened against the Developer or the Project pursuant to any applicable Hazardous Materials Laws; (B) any and all claims made or threatened by any third party against the Developer or the Project relating to damage, contribution, cost recovery, compensation, loss or injury resulting from any Hazardous Materials (the matters set forth in the foregoing clause (A) and this clause (B) are hereinafter referred to as “Hazardous Materials Claims”); (C) the presence of any Hazardous Materials in, on or under the Project; or (D) the Developer discovery of any occurrence or condition on any real property adjoining or in the vicinity of the Project classified as “borderzone property” under the provisions of California Health and Safety Code, Sections 25220 et seq., or any regulation adopted in accordance therewith, or to be otherwise subject to any restrictions on the ownership, occupancy, transferability or use of the Project under any Hazardous Materials Laws. The City shall have the right to join and participate in, as a party if it so elects, any legal proceedings or actions initiated in connection with any Hazardous Materials Claims, and to have its reasonable attorney’s fees in connection therewith paid by the Developer. (iv) Without the City’s prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and which the City shall promptly grant or deny, the Developer shall not take any remedial action in response to the presence of any Hazardous Materials on, under, or about the Project (other than in emergency situations or as required by governmental agencies having jurisdiction in which case the City agrees to provide its consent), nor enter into any settlement agreement, consent decree, or other compromise in respect to any Hazardous Materials Claims. (b) Indemnity. Without limiting the generality of the indemnification set forth in Section 7.4, the Developer hereby agrees to indemnify, protect, hold harmless and defend (by counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City), the City, its City Council members, officers, and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, liabilities, fines, penalties, charges, administrative and judicial proceedings and orders, judgments, remedial action requirements, enforcement actions of any kind, and all costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith (including, but not limited to, the fees and expenses of attorneys, experts, consultants or investigators), arising directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, out of: (1) the failure of the Developer or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors to comply with any Hazardous Materials Law relating in any way whatsoever to the handling, treatment, presence, removal, storage, decontamination, cleanup, transportation or disposal of Hazardous Materials into, on, under or from the Project; (2) the presence in, on or under the Project of any Hazardous Materials or any releases or discharges of any Hazardous Materials into, on, under or from the Project occurring from and after Developer’s acquisition of the Property; or (3) except to the extent such costs are related to hazardous materials conditions actually known to the City but not disclosed pursuant to Section 3.6(a), any activity carried on or undertaken on or off the Property by the Developer or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, prior or subsequent to the conveyance of the Property to the Developer, and whether by the Developer or any Page 540 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 12 employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Developer, in connection with the handling, treatment, removal, storage, decontamination, cleanup, transport or disposal of any Hazardous Materials at any time located or present on or under the ProjectProperty; provided, however, that the indemnification for activities undertaken off the Property shall only apply to activities undertaken by the Developer or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors. The foregoing indemnity shall further apply to any residual contamination on or under the Project, or affecting any natural resources, and to any contamination of any property or natural resources arising in connection with the generation, use, handling, treatment, storage, transport or disposal of any such Hazardous Materials, and irrespective of whether any of such activities were or will be undertaken in accordance with Hazardous Materials Laws. (c) No Limitation. The Developer hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Developer’s duties, obligations and liabilities under this Agreement, including, without limitation, under subsection (b) above, are in no way limited or otherwise affected by any information the City may have concerning the Project and/or the presence within the Project of any Hazardous Materials, whether the City obtained such information from the Developer or from its own investigations, unless such information was actually known to the City at the time of execution of this Agreement and/or the time of the close of escrow for the conveyance of the Property to the Developer but not disclosed pursuant to Section 3.6(a). Section 5.5 Insurance Requirements. (a) Required Coverage. The Developer and its successors and assigns to the Property pursuant to this Agreement shall maintain and keep in force, at the Developer (or its successors’) sole cost and expense, the following insurance applicable to the Project: (i) Worker’s Compensation insurance, including Employer’s Liability coverage, with limits not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each accident, to the extent required by law, which must be increased if required by California Workers’ Compensation Laws; provided, however, that if the Developer does not have employees, then no such insurance shall be required. (ii) Comprehensive General Liability insurance with limits not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, including coverages for Contractual Liability, Personal Injury, Broad Form Property Damage, Products and Completed Operations (this requirement may be satisfied by Comprehensive General Liability insurance with limits not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence and umbrella coverage providing the remaining One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) of coverage). (iii) Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance with limits not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, including coverages for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, as; provided, however, that if the Developer does not own or lease vehicles for purposes of this Agreement, then no automobile insurance shall be required. Page 541 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 13 (iv) After completion of construction, property insurance covering the Project covering all risks of loss (other than earthquake), including flood (if required), for one hundred percent (100%) of the replacement value, with deductible, if any, acceptable to the City, naming the City as Loss Payees, as its interest may appear. (v) During construction of the Improvements, Builder’s Risk insurance in an amount required by the Construction Lender. (vi) Insurance policy limits shall be subject to an increase, whenever the CPI increases by more than 10% over the base year or over the year of the most recent adjustment in the policy limit. “CPI” means the Consumer Price Index For San Francisco- Oakland-San JoseHayward, CA, All Items (base year 1982-1984 = 100), published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Base year” means the first full year after the Effective Date. “Year of the most recent adjustment” means the year in which the policy limit was most recently increased based on the CPI. The CPI in any year shall be the average monthly CPI for that year. (b) Contractor’s Insurance. The Developer shall cause any general contractor or agent working on the Improvements under direct contract with the Developer to maintain insurance of the types and in at least the minimum amounts described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii), and (a)(iii) above, and shall require that such insurance shall meet all of the general requirements of subsection (c) below. Subcontractors working on the Project under indirect contract with the Developer shall be required to maintain the insurance described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii) and (a)(iii) above, except that the Comprehensive General Liability insurance limits shall not be less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence combined single limit. Liability and Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance to be maintained by such contractors and agents pursuant to this subsection shall name as additional insureds the City, the City Council, and their officers, agents, and employees. (c) General Requirements. The required insurance shall be provided under an occurrence form, and the Developer shall maintain such coverage continuously throughout the term of the Regulatory Agreement. Should any of the required insurance be provided under a form of coverage that includes an annual aggregate limit or provides that claims investigation or legal defense costs be included in such annual aggregate limit, such annual aggregate limit shall be three times the occurrence limits specified above. Comprehensive General Liability, Comprehensive Automobile Liability and Property insurance policies shall be endorsed to name as additional insureds the City and its City Council members, officers, agents, and employees. All policies and bonds shall be endorsed to provide thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation, reduction in coverage, or intent not to renew to the address established for notices to the City pursuant to Section 7.1. (d) Certificates of Insurance. Upon the City’s request at any time during the term of the Regulatory Agreement, the Developer shall provide certificates of insurance and Page 542 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 14 policy endorsements or complete insurance policies, in form and with insurers reasonably acceptable to the City, evidencing compliance with the requirements of this Section. ARTICLE 6 DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section 6.1 General Applicability. The provisions of this Article 6 shall govern the parties’ remedies for breach or failure of this Agreement. Section 6.2 No Fault of Parties. The following events constitute a basis for a party to terminate this Agreement without the fault of the other: (a) The Developer, despite good faith and diligent efforts, is unable to satisfy all of the conditions precedent to the City’s obligation to convey the Property to the Developer, set forth in Article 2 by the Outside Date or if Developer determines in its sole discretion that (i) the Property is not suitable for the development of the Project or (ii) it will be unable to obtain the financing and/or land-use approvals needed to construct the Project, by not later than the Outside Date or such later date mutually agreed upon by the City and the Developer; or Upon the happening of any of the above-described events, and at the election of any party, this Agreement may be terminated by written notice to the other party. After termination, neither party shall have any rights against nor liability to the other party under this Agreement, except that the indemnification provisions of Sections 2.2(c), 5.4)(b) and 7.4 shall survive such termination and remain in full force and effect. Section 6.3 Fault of City. The following events each constitute an Event of Default by the City and a basis for the Developer to take action against the City: (a) The City, without good cause, fails to convey the Property to the Developer within the time and in the manner set forth in Article 3, and the Developer is otherwise entitled by this Agreement to such conveyance; or (b)(a) The City breaches any other material provision of this Agreement. Upon the happening of any of the above-described events, the Developer shall first notify the City in writing of its purported breach or failure, giving the City sixty (60) days from receipt of such notice to cure or, if cure cannot be accomplished within sixty (60) days, to commence to cure such breach, failure, or act. In the event the City does not then so cure within said sixty (60) days, or if the breach or failure is of such a nature that it cannot be cured within sixty (60) days, the City fails to commence to cure within such sixty (60) days and thereafter diligently complete such cure within a reasonable time thereafter but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120) days, then the Developer shall be afforded all rights and remedies available at law or in equity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that an event of default by the City occurs after the receipt by Developer of a tax credit reservation, the cure periods herein shall not apply, and Developer shall have the immediate right to compel the City’s specific performance hereunder. Section 6.4 Fault of the Developer. Except as to events constituting a basis for termination under Section 6.2, and except with respect to the exercise of the City’s police Page 543 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 15 powers, and provided further that the City has satisfied its obligations hereunder with respect to conveying title to the Property and exercising its power to givegiving consents and approvals under the terms of this Agreement as reasonably requested by Developer, the following events in subsections (a) through (d) below, shall each constitute an Event of Default by the Developer and a basis for the City to take action against the Developer: (a) The Developer fails to exercise good faith and diligent efforts to satisfy one or more of the conditions precedent to the City’s obligation to convey the Property to the Developer; or (b) The Developer refuses to accept conveyance from the City of the Property; or (c) Any representation or warranty contained in this Agreement or in any application, financial statement, certificate or report submitted to the City in connection with this Agreement proves to have been incorrect in any material and adverse respect when made and continues to be materially adverse to the City; or (d) Developer is in material breach of any other provision of this Agreement; or (e) A court having jurisdiction shall have made or entered any decree or order (1) adjudging the Developer to be bankrupt or insolvent, (2) approving as properly filed a petition seeking reorganization of the Developer or seeking any arrangement for either of the Developer under the bankruptcy law or any other applicable debtor’s relief law or statute of the United States or any state or other jurisdiction, (3) appointing a receiver, trustee, liquidator, or assignee of the Developer in bankruptcy or insolvency or for any of its properties, or (4) directing the winding up or liquidation of the Developer. The occurrence of any of the Events of Default in this subsection (e) shall not be subject to the cure rights set forth below. (f) Remedies. Upon the happening of any of the above-described events, the City shall first notify the Developer in writing of its purported breach, failure or act above described, giving the Developer sixty (60) days from receipt of such notice to cure, or, if cure cannot be accomplished within said sixty (60) days, to commence to cure such breach, failure, or act. In the event the Developer fails to cure within said sixty (60) days, or if such breach is of a nature that it cannot be cured within sixty (60) days, the Developer fails to commence to cure within said sixty (60) days and diligently complete such cure within a reasonable time thereafter but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120) days, then, the City shall be afforded all of the rights and remedies available under law or in equity. ARTICLE 7 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 7.1 Notices, Demands and Communications. Formal notices, demands, and communications between the City and the Developer shall be sufficiently given if and shall not be deemed given unless dispatched in writing and (a) addressed as follows and (b) delivered Page 544 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 16 in one of the following ways, and shall be deemed to have been delivered or received (i) five (5) days after the date when deposited in the United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid (except in the event of a postal disruption, by strike or otherwise, in the United States), or (ii) when personally delivered, (iii) when sent by email, provided a read receipt was promptly confirmed in writing by another means of notice allowed in this Section 7.1, or (iv) one business day after the date deposited with the courier when sent by personal delivery by a nationally recognized courier service (e.g., Federal Express) for next day delivery. The current addresses and email addresses of the City and the Developer are as follows: City: City of Ukiah Ukiah Civic Center 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Fax 707-463-6204 Attn: _______________ Developer: Danco Communities 5251 Ericson Way Arcata, CA 95521 Attn: Chris Dart (cdart@danco-group.com) When the Agreement is assigned to a Partnership pursuant to Section 7.14, then the City shall send to the limited partner of the Partnership a copy of all notices of default and all other notices that City sends to Developer and/or the Partnership, at the address provided by any such limited partner. The City shall accept a cure by such limited partner as a cure by the Developer and/or the Partnership. Section 7.2 Non-Liability of City Officials, Employees and Agents. No member, official, employee or agent of the City shall be personally liable to the Developer, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Developer or successor or on any obligation under the terms of this Agreement. Section 7.3 Forced Delay. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are due directly or indirectly to war; insurrection; strikes or other labor unrest; lock-outs; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; governmental restrictions or priority; litigation (including suits filed by third parties concerning or arising out of this Agreement); unseasonable weather or soils conditions which, in the opinion of the Developer’ s contractors, will necessitate delays; acts of the other party; acts or failure to act of any public or governmental agency or entity (other than the acts or failure to act of the City) despite the diligent and good faith efforts Page 545 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 17 of the party claiming the delay; or any other causes (other than the Developer’s inability to obtain financing for the Project) beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform. An extension of time for any cause will be deemed granted if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other within thirty (30) days from the date the party seeking the extension first discovered the cause and such extension of time is not rejected in writing by the other party within ten (10) days of the date the notice is deemed received under Section 7.1. Section 7.4 General Indemnification. The Developer agrees to indemnify, protect, hold harmless and defend (by counsel acceptable to the City) the City, the City Council members, and their officers and employees, from all suits, actions, claims, causes of action, costs (including attorney’s fees), demands, judgments and liens arising out of the Developer’s performance or non-performance under any of the City Regulatory Agreement or this Agreement, or any other agreement executed pursuant to the City Regulatory Agreement, except as caused by the City’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. Section 7.5 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California. Section 7.6 No Brokers. All parties represent to the other parties that it has not had any contact or dealings regarding the Property, or any communication in connection with the subject matter of this transaction, through any real estate broker or other person who can claim a right to a commission or finder’s fee. If any broker or finder makes a claim for a commission or finder’s fee based upon a contact, dealings, or communications, the party through whom the broker or finder makes this claim shall indemnify, defend with counsel of the indemnified party’s choice, and hold the indemnified party harmless from all expense, loss, damage and claims, including the indemnified party’s attorneys’ fees, if necessary, arising out of the broker’s or finder’s claim. The provisions of this section shall survive expiration of the Term or other termination of this Agreement, and shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7.7 Binding Upon Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest and assigns of each of the parties hereto except that there shall be no Transfer of any interest by any of the parties hereto except pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Any reference in this Agreement to a specifically named party shall be deemed to apply to any successor, heir, administrator, executor or assign of such party who has acquired an interest in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, or under law. Section 7.8 Parties Not Co-Venturers. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or does establish the City and the Developer as partners, co-venturers, or principal and agent with one another. Section 7.9 Warranties. The City expresses no warranty or representation to the Developer as to fitness or condition of the Property the subject of this Agreement for the building or construction to be conducted thereon. Section 7.10 Representations and Warranties. Page 546 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 18 (a) The City hereby covenants and warrants that it has full right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out all actions on its part contemplated by this Agreement; that the execution and delivery of this Agreement were duly authorized by proper action of the City and no consent, authorization or approval of the City Council or any board, commission or person is necessary in connection with such execution and delivery or to carry out all actions on the City’s part contemplated by this Agreement, except as have been obtained and are in full force and effect or are not required to be obtained until a later date; that the person executing this Agreement on behalf of the City has full corporate authority to do so; and that this Agreement constitutes the valid, binding and enforceable obligation of the City. (b) The Developer hereby covenants and warrants: that the Developer is an entity duly authorized and existing under California law; that the Developer is and shall remain in good standing and qualified to do business in the State of California; that the Developer has full right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out all actions on its part contemplated by this Agreement; that the execution and delivery of this Agreement were duly authorized by proper action of the Developer and no consent, authorization or approval of any person is necessary in connection with such execution and delivery or to carry out all actions on the Developer’s part contemplated by this Agreement, except as have been obtained and are in full force and effect or are not required to be obtained until a later date; that the person executing this Agreement on behalf of the Developer has full corporate authority to do so; and that this Agreement constitutes the valid, binding and enforceable obligation of the Developer. Section 7.11 Complete Understanding of the Parties. This Agreement may be executed in one or more duplicate originals, each of which shall be deemed to be an original. This Agreement and the attached exhibits constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to the matters set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement has been jointly negotiated and drafted. The language of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Section 7.12 Conflict With City Regulatory Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the City Regulatory Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control to the extent of such conflict. Section 7.14 Assignment. Developer shall be permitted to assign its interest in this Agreement to the Partnership. Page 547 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, and the Developer have executed this Agreement in triplicate on or as of the date first above written. DEVELOPER: DANCO COMMUNITIES, a California corporation By: _________________________ Chris Dart President CITY OF UKIAH, a municipal corporation By: Print Name: Title : Page 548 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 20 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Site All that certain real property situated in the County of Mendocino, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Tract One: Parcel One: Commencing at a 1 ¼ inch iron pipe on the westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad at the southerly terminus of the course " South 09°47'26" East, 225.30 feet" as shown on a Parcel Map filed in Map Case2, Drawer 48, Page 25, Mendocino County Records, the said iron pipe also marking the northeast corner of that4.68 acre parcel as shown on a Record of Survey map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 22, Page 71, Mendocino County Records; thence South 82°25'02" West (Record South 82°15'08" West along the north line of the said 4.68acre parcel 226.87 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continuing along the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel South 82°25'02" West, 71.18 feet; thence leaving the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel North 08°00'59"West, 126.94 feet ( Record North 08° 16'08" West 127.00 feet) to the southwest corner of Parcel 1 as shown on the said Parcel Map; thence along the west line of the said Parcel 1, North 07°51' 10" West (Record North08°04'42" West), 271.13 feet to the southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street as shown on the said Parcel Map; thence North 72°49'02" East (Record North 72°39'31" East), 102.29 feet; thence leaving the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street South 62°06'11" East, 15.95 feet; thence from a tangent that bears South 14°10'15" East, along the arc of a curve to the right with a radius of 375.00 feet, a central angle of 21°57'17" and an arc length of143.69 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 825.00 feet, a central angle of 15°22"00" and an arc length of 221.26 feet; thence South 07°34'58" East, 44.85 feet to the point of beginning. APN: 003-040-77 Parcel Two: TOGETHER with, as an appurtenance to the above described parcel of land, a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and public utility purposes more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 1 ¼ inch iron pipe on the westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad at the southerly terminus of the course "South 09°47'26" East, 225.30 feet as shown on a Parcel Map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 48, Page 25,Mendocino County Records, the said iron pipe also marking the northeast corner of that 4.68 acre parcel as shown on a Record of Survey map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 22, Page 71, Mendocino County Records; thence South 82°25'02" West (Record South 82°15'08" West) along the north line of the said 4.68 acre parcel 176.87 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continuing along the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel South 82°25'02"West, 50.00 feet; thence leaving the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel North 07°34'58" West, 44.85 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 825.00 feet, a central angle of 15°22'00" and an arc length of221.26 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 375.00 feet, a central angle of 21°57' 17" and an arc length of 143.69 feet; thence North 62°06'11" West, 15.95 feet to the southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street; thence along the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street North 72°49'02" East ( Record North72°39'31" East ), 72.79 feet; thence leaving the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street South 28°51 '04"West, 15.92 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 425.00 feet, a central angle of 22°20'30" and an arc length of 165.72 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 775.00 feet, a central angle of15°22'00" and an arc length of 207.86 feet; thence South 07°34'58" East, 44.85 feet to the point of beginning. Tract Two: Parcel One: Commencing at a 1 ¼ inch iron pipe on the westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad at the southerly terminus of the course "South 09°47'26" East, 225.30 feet" as shown on a Parcel Map filed in Map Case2, Drawer 48, Page 25, Mendocino County Records, the said iron pipe also marking the northeast corner of that4.68 acre parcel as shown on a Record of Survey map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 22, Page 71, Mendocino County Records; thence North 09°37'32" West (Record North 09°47'26" West along the said westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, 225.30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence leaving the said westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad South 82°25'02" West, 147.57 feet; thence from a tangent that bears North 05°52'15" East along the arc of a curve to the right with a radius of 775.00 feet, a central angle of 01°54'47" and an arc length of 25.88 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 425.00feet, a central angle of 22°20'30" and an arc length of 165.72 feet; thence North 28°51 '04" East, 15.92 feet to the southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street; thence along the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street North72°49'02" East (Record North 72°39'31" East), 113.33 feet to the said westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad; thence leaving the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street and along the said westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, South 09°37'32" East ( Record South09°47'26" East), 221.14 feet to the point of beginning. APN: 003-040-78 Parcel Two: TOGETHER with, as an appurtenance to the above described parcel of land, a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and public utility purposes more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 1 ¼ inch iron pipe on the westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad at the southerly terminus of the course "South 09°47'26" East, 225.30 feet as shown on a Parcel Map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 48, Page 25,Mendocino County Records, the said iron pipe also marking the northeast corner of that 4.68 acre parcel as shown on a Record of Survey map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 22, Page 71, Mendocino County Records; thence South 82°25'02" West (Record South 82°15'08" West) along the north line of the said 4.68 acre parcel 176.87 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continuing along the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel South 82°25'02"West, 50.00 feet; thence leaving the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel North 07°34'58" Page 549 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 21 West, 44.85 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 825.00 feet, a central angle of 15°22'00" and an arc length of221.26 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 375.00 feet, a central angle of 21°57' 17" and an arc length of 143.69 feet; thence North 62°06'11" West, 15.95 feet to the southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street; thence along the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street North 72°49'02" East ( Record North72°39'31" East ), 72.79 feet; thence leaving the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street South 28°51 '04"West, 15.92 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 425.00 feet, a central angle of 22°20'30" and an arc length of 165.72 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 775.00 feet, a central angle of15°22'00" and an arc length of 207.86 feet; thence South 07°34'58" East, 44.85 feet to the point of beginning. Tract Three: Parcel One: Beginning at a 1 ¼ inch iron pipe on the westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad at the southerly terminus of the course "South 09°47'26" East, 225.30 feet" as shown on a Parcel Map filed in Map Case2, Drawer 48, Page 25, Mendocino County Records, the said iron pipe also marking the northeast corner of that4.68 acre parcel as shown on a Record of Survey map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 22, Page 71, Mendocino County Records; thence leaving the said westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad South82°25'02" West ( Record South 82°15'08" West) along the north line of the said 4.68 acre parcel, 176.87 feet; thence leaving the said north line North 07°34'58" West, 44.85 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 775.00 feet, a central angle of 13°27' 13" and an arc length of 181.98 feet; thence North 82°25'02" East, 147.57feet to the said westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad; thence South 09°37'32" East(Record South 09°47'26" East) along the said westerly right of way line, 225.30 feet to the point of beginning. APN: 003-040-79 Parcel Two: TOGETHER with, as an appurtenance to the above described parcel of land, a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and public utility purposes more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 1 ¼ inch ironpipe on the westerly right of way line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad at the southerly terminus of the course "South 09°47'26" East, 225.30 feet as shown on a Parcel Map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 48, Page 25,Mendocino County Records, the said iron pipe also marking the northeast corner of that 4.68 acre parcel as shown on a Record of Survey map filed in Map Case 2, Drawer 22, Page 71, Mendocino County Records; thence 82°25'02" West (Record South 82°15'08" West) along the north line of the said 4.68 acre parcel 176.87 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continuing along the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel South 82°25'02"West, 50.00 feet; thence leaving the said north line of the 4.68 acre parcel North 07°34'58" West, 44.85 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 825.00 feet, a central angle of 15°22'00" and an arc length of221.26 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 375.00 feet, a central angle of 21°57' 17" and an arc length of 143.69 feet; thence North 62°06'11" West, 15.95 feet to the southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street; thence along the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street North 72°49'02" East ( Record North72°39'31" East ), 72.79 feet; thence leaving the said southerly right of way line of Gobbi Street South 28°51 '04"West, 15.92 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 425.00 feet, a central angle of 22°20'30" and an arc length of 165.72 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left with a radius of 775.00 feet, a central angle of15°22'00" and an arc length of 207.86 feet; thence South 07°34'58" East, 44.85 feet to the point of beginning Page 550 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 22 EXHIBIT B Conceptual Site Plan Page 551 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 23 EXHIBIT C Form of City Regulatory Agreement RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Ukiah as Housing Successor 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Attn: Executive Director No fee document pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 ____________________________________________________________________________ REGULATORY AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS This Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of __________, 2021, by and between the City of Ukiah (“City”), a general law city, acting in its capacity as the City’s Housing Successor (the "Housing Successor") and [Partnership] (the "Developer"). The Housing Successor and the Developer are sometimes referred to in this Agreement individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties". RECITALS 1. The Housing Successor has entered into a Disposition Agreement (the “Agreement") with Developer under which the Housing Successor agrees to convey for fair market value undeveloped land to Developer located in the City of Ukiah, County of Mendocino, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached to and incorporated in this Agreement (the "Property"). The Property will be used for construction and development of a mixed-use affordable housing and commercial project. 2. The City acquired the Property using funds set aside for low-income housing and the Developer financed the acquisition of the Property with a seller carryback loan from the City (the “Loan”). The City has determined that the terms of the Loan assure the recovery of the City’s investment and a reasonable interest rate to allow City to use the full value of its investment for low income housing in compliance with legal requirements. Page 552 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 24 . 3. In accordance with the Redevelopment, the expenditure of monies to acquire the Property and convey it to the Developer will serve the purposes of Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2, by improving and increasing the community's supply of affordable housing. 4. The Housing Successor has agreed to convey the Property to Developer on the condition that the Development be maintained and operated in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 33334.2 et seq., 33413(a) and 33413(b)(2)(A)(ii), and in accordance with additional restrictions concerning affordability, operation, and maintenance of the Development, as specified in this Agreement. 5. As an inducement to the City to transfer the Property and make the Loan to Developer, Developer has further agreed to observe all the terms and conditions set forth below. 6. In order to ensure that the entire Development will be used and operated in accordance with these conditions and restrictions, the Housing Successor and Developer wish to enter into this Agreement. THEREFORE, the Housing Successor and Developer agree as follows. ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. When used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in this Article 1. (a) "Actual Household Size" shall mean the actual number of persons in the applicable household. (b) "Adjusted Income" shall mean the total anticipated annual income of all persons in a household, as calculated in accordance with 25 California Code of Regulations Section 6914 or pursuant to a successor State housing program that utilizes a reasonably similar method of calculation of adjusted income. In the event that no such program exists, the Housing Successor shall provide the Developer with a reasonably similar method of calculation of adjusted income as provided in said Section 6914. (c) (c) "Agreement" shall mean this Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants. (d) (e)(c) "Assumed Household Size" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(c). Page 553 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 25 (f)(d) "Housing Successor” means the City of Ukiah, acting in the capacity of the Housing Successor in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 34176 and 34176. "City" shall mean the City of Ukiah, a municipal corporation. (g)(e) "Developer" shall mean Danco Communities, a California corporation, and its successors and assigns as permitted by this Agreement. (h)(f) "Development" shall mean the Property and the Improvements. (i) "Improvements" shall mean the improvements to be constructed by the Developer on the Property, including the Units, and appurtenant landscaping and improvements. (g) “Income Limit” is the maximum amount of income a household can earn to qualify for a restricted Unit as described pursuant to Section 2.1 upon initial occupancy of a given Unit. (j)(h) "Median Income" shall mean the median gross yearly income adjusted for Actual Household Size or Assumed Household Size, as specified in this Agreement, in the County of Mendocino, California, as published from time to time by HUD and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”). In the event that such income determinations are no longer published, or are not updated for a period of at least eighteen (18) months, the Housing Successor shall provide the Developer with other income determinations which are reasonably similar with respect to methods of calculation to those previously published by HUD and HCD. (k)(i) " (l)(j) (m)(k) "Property" shall mean the real property described in Exhibit A attached o and incorporated in this Agreement. (n)(l) "Rent" shall mean the total of monthly payments by the tenants of a Unit for the following: use and occupancy of the Unit and land and associated facilities, including parking; other than security deposits; and the cost of an adequate level of service for utilities paid by the tenant, including garbage collection, sewer, water, electricity, and gas, but not cable or telephone service. (o)(m) "Tenant" shall mean a household occupying a Unit. (p)(n) "Term" shall mean the term of this Agreement which shall commence on the date of recordation of this Agreement and shall continue until the date that is 55 years thereafter. (q)(o) "Units" shall mean the rental units to be constructed by the Developer on the Property. Page 554 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 26 ARTICLE 2. OCCUPANCY AND AFFORDABILITY 2.1 Occupancy Requirements. Except for the manager’s unit, Developer shall ensure that all Units are occupied as follows: 8 of the Units will be occupied by households at or below 30% of Median Income, 21 of the Units will be occupied by households at or below 40% of Median Income, 25 of the Units will be occupied by households at or below 50% of Median Income, _8 of the Units will be occupied by households at or below 60% of Median Income, and 7 of the Units will be occupied by households at or below 80% of Median Income. One Unit shall be an unrestricted manager’s unit[2]. 2.2 Allowable Rent. (a) Low Income Rent. Subject to Section 2.3 below, the Rent charged to Tenants of the Units shall not exceed one-twelfth (1/12th) of thirty percent (30%) of the applicable Median Income, adjusted for Assumed Household Size[3]. (b) In calculating the allowable Rent for the Units, the following Assumed Household Sizes shall be utilized, provided, however, that if the Project is financed with low income housing tax credits, the assumed household size required by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee shall control: Number of Bedrooms Assumed Household Size Studio 1 One 2 Two 3 Three 4 (c) Rent Increases. Annual rent increases, if any, shall be limited to: (i) the percentage of increase in Median Income since the last rent increase; (ii) the percentage increase, allowed by any other regulatory agreement applicable to the Development, whichever is lower. 2.3 Increased Income of Tenants. (a) Increase Above Low Income Limit. In the event, upon recertification of a Tenant's household's income, the Developer determines that the income of a household exceeds the income levelIncome Limit applicable to the Unit, such household's Unit shall be redesignated as a higher Median Income level and such household’s rent shall be increased to a level applicable to the Units at such income level, and the Developer shall rent the next available Unit at the income level originally applicable to the household until the unit mix required by this Agreement is achieved.. (b) Termination of Occupancy. Upon termination of occupancy of a Unit by a Tenant, such Unit shall be deemed to be continuously occupied by a household of the same Page 555 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 27 Median Income level as the initial income level of the vacating Tenant, until such Unit is reoccupied, at which time the Median Income level of the Unit shall be redetermined. 2.4 Tenant Selection. All of the Units shall be available for occupancy on a continuous basis to members of the general public who are income eligible. Developer shall not give preference to any particular class or group of persons in renting the Units, except to the extent that the Units are required to be leased to Low Income Households. There shall be no other discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, source of income, disability, or ancestry, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of any Unit. 2.5 Lease Provisions. Developer shall include in leases for all Units provisions which authorize Developer to terminate the tenancy of any household only for “good cause” in accordance with the rules and regulations of the low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) program.. Each lease or rental agreement shall also provide that the household is subject to annual income recertification, and that, if the household's income increases above the applicable limits for applicable Median Income, such household's Rent may be subject to increase. 2.6 Income Certification. The Developer will obtain, complete and maintain on file, immediately prior to initial occupancy and annually thereafter, income and household size certifications from each Tenant renting any of the Units in accordance with the rules and procedures of the LIHTC program. Copies of tenant income certifications shall be available to the Housing Successor upon request. 2.7 Annual Reports to Housing Successor. Developer shall submit to the Housing Successor not later than the ninetieth (90th) day after the close of each calendar year during the Term, a statistical report, including income and rent data for all Units. 2.8 Records. Developer shall maintain complete, accurate and current records pertaining to the Development, and shall permit any duly authorized representative of the Housing Successor to inspect records, including records pertaining to income and household size of Tenants upon no less than 48 hours written notice to Developer. The Developer shall retain copies of all materials obtained or produced with respect to occupancy of the Units for a period of at least five (5) years. 2.9 On-site Inspection. The Housing Successor shall have the right to perform an on- site inspection of the Development at least one time per year upon no less than 48 hours written notice to Developer. The Developer agrees to cooperate in such inspection. ARTICLE 3. OPERATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT 3.1 Mixed Use. The Development shall be used only for rental residential use for lower income households, related amenities and commercial space. Page 556 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 28 3.2 Taxes and Assessments. Developer shall pay all real and personal property taxes, assessments, if any, and charges and all franchise, income, employment, old age benefit, withholding, sales, and other taxes assessed against it, or payable by it, at such times and in such manner as to prevent any penalty from accruing, or any line or charge from attaching to the Property; provided, however, that Developer shall have the right to contest in good faith, any such taxes, assessments, or charges. In the event Developer exercises its right to contest any tax, assessment, or charge against it, Developer, on final determination of the proceeding or contest, shall immediately pay or discharge any decision or judgment rendered against it, together with all costs, charges and interest. ARTICLE 4. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE 4.1 Management Responsibilities. The Developer is responsible for all management functions with respect to the Development, including without limitation the selection of tenants, certification and recertification of household size and income, evictions, collection of rents and deposits, maintenance, landscaping, routine and extraordinary repairs, replacement of capital items, and security. The Housing Successor shall have no direct responsibility over management of the Development. The Developer shall retain a professional property management company approved by the Housing Successor in its reasonable discretion to perform its management duties under this Agreement. A resident manager shall also be required. 4.2 Management Agent. The Development shall at all times be managed by an experienced management agent reasonably acceptable to the Housing Successor (as approved, the "Management Agent"), with demonstrated ability to operate residential facilities like the Development in a manner that will provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing. The Housing Successor agrees that Danco Communities is approved as the initial Management Agent of the Development. The Developer shall submit for the Housing Successor's approval the identity of any proposed substitute Management Agent. The Developer shall also submit such additional information about the background, experience and financial condition of any proposed substitute Management Agent as is reasonably necessary for the Housing Successor to determine whether the proposed Management Agent meets the standard for a qualified Management Agent set forth above. If the proposed substitute Management Agent meets the standard for a qualified Management Agent set forth above, the Housing Successor shall approve the proposed Management Agent by notifying the Developer in writing. Unless the proposed Management Agent is disapproved by the Housing Successor within thirty (30) days, which disapproval shall state with reasonable specificity the basis for disapproval, it shall be deemed approved. If the proposed Management Agent is disapproved by the Housing Successor for failing to meet the standard for a qualified Management Agent set forth above, the Housing Successor shall provide the specific reasons for such disapproval, and the Developer shall submit for the Housing Successor's approval a new proposed Management Agent within thirty (30) days following the Housing Successor's disapproval. The Developer shall continue to submit proposed Management Agents for Housing Successor approval until the Housing Successor approves a proposed Management Agent. 4.3 Property Maintenance. The Developer agrees, for the entire Term of this Agreement, to maintain all interior and exterior improvements, including landscaping, on the Page 557 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 29 Property in good condition and repair (and, as to landscaping, in a healthy condition) and in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, orders and regulations of all federal, state, county, municipal, and other governmental agencies and bodies having or claiming jurisdiction and all their respective departments, bureaus, and officials. The Housing Successor places prime importance on quality maintenance to protect its investment and to ensure that all Housing Successor assisted affordable housing projects within the City are not allowed to deteriorate due to poor maintenance. Normal wear and tear of the Development will be acceptable to the Housing Successor assuming the Developer agrees to provide all necessary improvements to assure the Development is maintained in good condition. The Developer shall make all repairs and replacements necessary to keep the improvements in good condition and repair. ARTICLE 5. ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFERS 5.1 Definitions. As used in this Article, the term "Transfer" means: (a) Any total or partial sale, assignment or conveyance, or any trust or power, or any transfer in any other mode or form, of or with respect to this Agreement or of the Development or any part of the Developer or any interest in the Developer or any contract or agreement to do any of the same; or (b) Any total or partial sale, assignment or conveyance, of any trust or power, or any transfer in any other mode or form, of or with respect to any ownership interest in Developer; or (c) Any merger, consolidation, sale or lease of all or substantially all of the assets of Developer; or (d) The leasing of part or all of the Property or the Improvements on the Property; provided, however, that leases of the units included within the Development to tenant occupants, in accordance with the Regulatory Agreement, shall not be deemed a "Transfer" for purposes of this Article. 5.2 Purpose of Restrictions on Transfer. This Agreement is entered into solely for the purpose of the development and operation of the Development and its subsequent use in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Developer recognizes that the qualifications and identity of Developer are of particular concern to the Housing Successor, in view of: (a) The importance of the redevelopment of the Property to the general welfare of the community; and Page 558 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 30 (b) The land acquisition assistance and other public aids that have been made available by law and by the government for the purpose of making such redevelopment possible; and (c) The reliance by the Housing Successor upon the unique qualifications and ability of the Developer to serve as the catalyst for development of the Property and upon the continuing interest which the Developer will have in the Property to assure the quality of the use, operation and maintenance deemed critical by the Housing Successor in the development of the Property; and (d) The fact that a change in ownership or control of the Developer as owner of the Property, or of a substantial part of the Property, or any other act or transaction involving or resulting in a significant change in ownership or with respect to the identity of the parties in control of the Developer or the degree those parties' control of the Developer is for practical purposes a transfer or disposition of the Property; and (e) The fact that the Property is not to be acquired or used for speculation, but only for development and operation by the Developer in accordance with the Agreement; and (f) The importance to the Housing Successor and the community of the standards of use, operation and maintenance of the Property. The Developer further recognizes that it is because of such qualifications and identity that the Housing Successor is entering into this Agreement with the Developer and that Transfers are permitted only as provided in this Agreement. 5.3 Prohibited Transfers. The limitations on Transfers set forth in this Article shall apply throughout the Term. Except as expressly permitted in this Agreement, the Developer represents and agrees that the Developer has not made or created, and will not make or create or suffer to be made or created, any Transfer, either voluntarily or by operation of law without the prior written approval of the Housing Successor. Any Transfer made in contravention of this Section shall be void and shall be deemed to be a default under this Agreement whether or not the Developer knew of or participated in such Transfer. 5.4 Permitted Transfers. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5.3, the following Transfers shall be permitted and by execution of this Agreement are approved by the Housing Successor, subject to satisfaction of the requirements of Section 5.5: Page 559 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 31 (a) Any Transfer creating a mortgage, deed of trust, or other method of security to finance acquisition, development, rehabilitation of repair of the Development (a "Secured Financing"); (b) Any Transfer directly resulting from the foreclosure of a Secured Financing or the granting of a deed in lieu of foreclosure of a Secured Financing; and (c) The admission of an investor as a limited partner of the Developer for the purposes of syndicating the tax credits to an investor to obtain funds for acquisition, development, rehabilitation or repair of the Development, and any subsequent transfers by the investor limited partner. The Housing Successor, by execution of this Agreement, approves the sale of limited partnership interests in the Developer to investors. (d) Any transfer to an affiliate of Developer or a limited partnership in which Developer or an entity controlled by Developer or Danco Communities is the general partner or to a limited liability company of which Developer or an entity controlled by Developer or Danco Communities is the managing member. (e) The removal by the investor limited partner of a general partner of the Developer and its replacement pursuant to the terms of the Developer’s Partnership Agreement. 5.5 Effectiveness of Certain Permitted Transfers. No Transfer of this Agreement permitted pursuant to Section 5.4 (other than a Transfer pursuant to a Secured Financing under Section 5.4(a) or (b)) or Section 5.6 shall be effective unless, at the time of the Transfer, the person or entity to which such Transfer is made, by an instrument in writing reasonably satisfactory to the Housing Successor and in form recordable among the land records of Mendocino County, shall expressly assume the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement and agree to be subject to the conditions and restrictions to which the Developer is subject arising during this Agreement, to the fullest extent that such obligations are applicable to the particular portion of or interest in the Development conveyed in such Transfer. Anything to the contrary notwithstanding, the holder of a Secured Financing whose interest shall have been acquired by, through or under a Secured Financing or shall have been derived immediately from any holder of a Secured Financing shall not be required to give to Housing Successor such written assumption until such holder or other person is in possession of the Property or entitled to possession of the Property pursuant to enforcement of the Secured Financing. In the absence of specific written agreement by the Housing Successor, no such Transfer, assignment or approval by the Housing Successor shall be deemed to relieve the Developer or any other party from any obligations under this Agreement. 5.6 Other Transfers with Housing Successor Consent. The Housing Successor may, in its sole discretion, approve in writing other Transfers as requested by the Developer. In connection with such request, there shall be submitted to the Housing Successor for review all instruments and other legal documents proposed to effect any Page 560 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 32 such Transfer. If a requested Transfer is approved by the Housing Successor such approval shall be indicated to the Developer in writing. Such approval shall be granted or denied by the Housing Successor within thirty (30) days of receipt by the Housing Successor of Developer's request for approval of a Transfer. ARTICLE 6. MISCELLANEOUS 6.1 Term. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the Property for the entire Term even if the entire Loan is paid in full prior to the end of the Term. 6.2 Compliance with Program Requirements. The Developer's actions with respect to the Property shall at all times be in full conformity with the requirements imposed on projects assisted with Redevelopment Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund monies under California Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2 et seq. 6.3 Covenants to Run With the Land. The Housing Successor and Developer declare their express intent that the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Agreement shall run with the land, and shall bind all successors in title to the Property, provided, however, that on the expiration of the Term of this Agreement said covenants and restrictions shall expire. 6.4 Developer Default; Enforcement by the Housing Successor. If Developer fails to cure a default under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after the Housing Successor has notified the Developer in writing of the default or, if the default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days, failed to commence to cure within thirty (30) days and thereafter diligently pursue such cure, the Housing Successor shall have the right to enforce this Agreement by bringing an action at law or in equity, including, but not limited to, an action to compel Developer's performance of its obligations under this Agreement. 6.5 Attorneys Fees and Costs. In any action brought to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to all costs and expenses of suit, including attorneys' fees. 6.6 Recording and Filing. The Housing Successor and Developer shall cause this Agreement, and all amendments and supplements to it, to be recorded against the Property in the Official Records of the County of Mendocino. 6.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 6.8 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument executed by all the Parties or their successors in title, and duly recorded in the real property records of the County of Mendocino, California. 6.9 Notice. Formal notices, demands, and communications between the Housing Successor and the Developer shall be sufficiently given if and shall not be deemed given unless dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered Page 561 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 (DevRevisions030121) 33 by reputable overnight delivery service, return receipt requested, or delivered personally with a delivery receipt, to the principal office of the Housing Successor and the Developer as follows: Housing Successor: Ukiah Redevelopment Housing Successor 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Attn: Executive Director Developer: [___________________] c/o Danco Communities 5251 Ericson Way Arcata, CA 95521 Attn: President Such written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as the affected Party may from time to time designate by mail as provided in this Section. Receipt shall be deemed to have occurred on the date shown on a written receipt as the date of delivery or refusal of delivery (or attempted delivery if undeliverable). 6.10 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired by such invalidity, illegality or uneforceability. 6.11 Multiple Originals; Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original. 6.12 Estoppel Certificates. The City agrees, from time to time, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of written notice from Developer, to execute and deliver to Developer a written statement certifying that, to the knowledge of the City, (a) this Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the Parties (if such be the case); (b) this Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing, and if so amended, identifying the amendments; (c) Developer is not in default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or if in default, to describe therein the nature and amount of any such defaults; and (d) such other matters reasonably required by any lender or the tax credit investor. Page 562 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Housing Successor and Developer have executed this Agreement by duly authorized representatives, all on the date first written above. HOUSING SUCCESSOR: City of Ukiah By: Its: ___________________________________ DEVELOPER: [PARTNERSHIP] APPROVED AS TO FORM Housing Successor Counsel By: _________________ _________________ A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF ) On ___________________, 20__ before me, _____________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared __________________________________________, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Page 563 of 585 Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ____________________________________ (Seal) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF ) On ___________________, 20__ before me, _____________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared __________________________________________, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ____________________________________ (Seal) Page 564 of 585 Page 36 EXHIBIT D Form of City Grant Deed Page 565 of 585 Page 37 EXHIBIT E Public Utilities Easement (To be completed; info below from preliminary title report) Easement(s) for the purposes stated herein and incidental purposes as provided in the document(s): Recorded: April 24, 1968 in Book 762, Page 746 of Official Records For: public utilities, ingress and egress In favor of: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Easements, terms and provisions as contained in an instrument, Entitled : Agreement and Grant of Easement Recorded: April 13, 1989 in Book 1745, Page 82 of Official Records6.Easements, building setback lines, notations and/or recitals as shown or provided for on the map recorded April 27, 1989 in Map Case 2, Drawer 48, Page 24 Mendocino County Records. Page 566 of 585 Page 38 EXHIBIT F Form of City Note PROMISSORY NOTE (City Loan) $[_________] __________ __, 202__ For value received, [______________], a California limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as “Maker”), promises to pay to the order of The City of Ukiah, a municipal corporation (together with any future holders of this Note, “Holder”), at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482, or as directed otherwise in writing by Holder, the principal sum of [______________ ($___________)]. This Note is secured by the Deed of Trust (as defined below) on real property upon which Maker intends to construct a 70-unit multifamily apartment complex and related improvements (the “Project”). All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Maker’s Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of _______, 202___ (“Partnership Agreement”). [Capitalized terms to be revised based upon the selection of the Tax Credit Investor.] 1. The Loan. This Promissory Note (the “Note”) evidences the obligation of the Maker to the Holder for the repayment of funds loaned to the Holder by the Maker (the "Loan") as a seller carryback to pay Project property acquisitions costs. 2. Interest. This Promissory Note (“Note”) shall bear simple interest at 3% annually. 3. Payments. Annually each year during the term of this Note commencing on the first Payment Date following the Final Closing, Maker shall pay to Holder the Net Cash Flow remaining after payment of items noted as clauses (__) through (__) of Section [_____] of the Partnership Agreement. Accompanying each payment of Net Cash Flow, Maker shall provide Holder with a detailed accounting of all revenue sources and expenses used to calculate Net Cash Flow. Maker shall maintain accurate financial records in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (“GAAP”) which are auditable and available to the Holder to review, copy and audited during regular business hours. If any audit or review of such revenues and expenses establishes that Net Cash Flow was greater than reported to Maker, Holder shall pay all costs incurred by Maker to conduct the Audit in addition to liquidated damages of __% of the understated amount. 4. Maturity Date. The principal amount of this Note along with all accrued and unpaid interest and/or other amounts due shall be due and payable on the fifty-fifth (55) anniversary of the date of issuance of certificates of occupancy for the Project (the “Maturity Date”); provided, Page 567 of 585 Page 39 however, that the Maturity Date may be accelerated in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Note. 5. Security. Payment of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note is secured by that certain Subordinated Deed of Trust (the “Deed of Trust”), of even date herewith, and made by Maker, as trustor, to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, as trustee, for the benefit of Holder, as beneficiary, which encumbers real property in the County of Mendocino, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit A to the Deed of Trust, together with the improvements located thereon. 6. Default. If any of the following events (“Events of Default”) shall occur: (a) a default in the payment when due of any amount hereunder and such payment is not made within 10 business days after Maker received written notice thereof; (b) failure to pay all outstanding principal and accrued interest on the indebtedness evidenced by this Note on the Maturity Date; or (c) any breach or default under the Deed of Trust past any applicable notice and cure period, then, subject to the provisions of the Deed of Trust, all sums of interest and principal remaining outstanding under this Note shall be deemed automatically and immediately due and payable, without any declaration or other determination by Holder and without notice of default, presentment, demand, protest, or further notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by Maker. The rights of Holder under this Section 6 are in addition to other rights and remedies which Holder may have. 7. Notice and Cure. [_____________] (the “Limited Partner”) or any other successor entity in such entity’s capacity as a limited partner of the Maker, shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any defaults hereunder following 10 business days notice (with respect to monetary defaults) and 30 business days notice (with respect to non-monetary defaults). In the event such default requires the removal of the general partner of Maker, the Limited Partner shall have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to effectuate such removal and cause such cure. Any default cure tendered by the Maker’s Limited Partner shall be accepted or rejected as if tendered by the Maker. In the event Maker is provided notice by Holder under the Loan Documents, Holder shall provide the Limited Partner with simultaneous written notice at the following address: [_______________] 8. Prepayment. The principal amount of this Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty. 9. Interest Rate After Acceleration or Maturity. When this Note becomes due in full, whether by acceleration (upon an Event of Default or otherwise), by the occurrence of the Maturity Date, or in any other manner, if Maker fails to pay all amounts due the unpaid principal Page 568 of 585 Page 40 and interest (if any) balance and costs incurred (and any judgment or decree with respect thereto) shall, from and after the date due, bear interest until paid at an annual rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. 10. Waivers by Holder. Holder shall not by any act of omission or commission be deemed to waive any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver be in writing and signed by Holder, and then only to the extent specifically set forth therein. A waiver as to any one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waiver of such right or remedy as to the same event on any other occasion or as to a different event on the same or any other occasion. 11. Waivers by Maker. Maker waives presentment for payment, demand, notice of non- payment, notice of protest, and protest of this Note and all of the notices in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of the payment of this Note. Maker consents to any and all extensions of time, renewals, waivers, or modifications that may be granted by Holder with respect to the payment or other provisions of this Note, and to the release of the collateral or any part thereof with or without substitution and agree that additional makers, endorsers, guarantors, or sureties may become parties hereto without notice to them and without affecting their liability hereunder. 12. Application of Payments. All payments under this Note shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America. Payments shall be credited first against any costs or expenses due under this Note, then to any accrued interest (if any), and finally to principal. 13. Interest Rate Limitation. In no event shall the interest rate charged under this Note exceed the maximum rate permitted under applicable law. In calculating whether any interest exceeds the lawful maximum, all such interest shall be amortized, prorated, allocated and spread over the full amount and term of all principal indebtedness of Maker to Holder, and if through any contingency or event, Holder receives or is deemed to receive interest in excess of the lawful maximum, any such excess shall be deemed to have been applied toward payment of the principal of any and all then outstanding indebtedness of Maker to Holder, or if there is no such indebtedness, shall immediately be returned to Maker. 14. No Acceleration Upon Transfer or Refinancing. The Maker shall be permitted to sell or refinance the Project or any interest therein, and, provided such transferee agrees to assume Maker’s obligations under this Note, the Note shall not become due and payable. 15. Non-Recourse. This Note shall be non-recourse to the Maker, the partners of Maker, and its or their successors or assigns, and Holder shall look solely to the Property (as such term is defined in the Deed of Trust) and other collateral granted to the Holder under and pursuant to the Deed of Trust for satisfaction of its obligations under this Note. 16. Enforcement Costs. Should suit on this Note or foreclosure of the Deed of Trust be commenced, Maker agrees to pay the costs of foreclosure and such additional sums as a court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys fees in any suit. 17. Governing Law. Maker hereby agrees and acknowledges that this Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any alteration, change or Page 569 of 585 Page 41 modification of or to this Note, in order to become effective, shall be made by written instrument executed by both Maker and Holder. [Signature Page Follows] Page 570 of 585 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has executed this Note as of the date first written above. MAKER: [_______________], a California limited partnership Page 571 of 585 -2- EXHIBIT G Form of City Deed of Trust Recording Requested by and After Recording Return to: [___________________] c/o Danco Communities 5251 Ericson Way Arcata, CA 95521 DEED OF TRUST (CITY LOAN) NOTE: This deed of trust contains a subordination clause which may result in your security interest in the property becoming subject to and of lower priority than the lien of some other or later security instrument. THIS DEED OF TRUST is made as of ____________ by [____________], a California limited partnership (“Trustor”), in favor of COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (“Trustee”), for the benefit of THE CITY OF UKIAH (together with any successor to its rights, duties and obligations), a municipal corporation and existing under the laws of the State of California (“Beneficiary”). TRUSTOR, in consideration of the indebtedness herein recited and the trust herein created, irrevocably grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, that real property located in the County of Mendocino, State of California as more fully described in Attachment A (“Real Property”). TOGETHER with all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the Real Property, and all easements, rights, appurtenances and rents (subject however to the rights and authorities given herein to Beneficiary to collect and apply such rents), all of which shall be deemed to be and remain a part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust; and all of the foregoing, together with said property and the Real Property are hereinafter referred to as the “Property”. TO SECURE to Beneficiary the payment of the indebtedness evidenced by a Promissory Note, of even date herewith, and extensions and renewals thereof (herein “Note”), in the principal sum of $_____________. Trustor covenants that it is lawfully seized of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right to grant and convey the Property, and that, to the best of Trustor’s knowledge, the Property is unencumbered except for encumbrances of record. Trustor warrants and will defend generally the title to the Property against all claims and demands, subject to encumbrances of record. Page 572 of 585 -3- A. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Trustor agrees as follows: 1. Preservation and Maintenance of Property. Trustor agrees to keep the Property in good condition and repair to the extent of available funds; not to remove or demolish any building thereon; to the extent of available insurance proceeds to complete or restore promptly and in good and workmanlike manner any building which may be constructed, damaged, or destroyed thereon and to pay when due all claims for labor performed and materials furnished therefore; to intentionally comply with all laws affecting the Property or requiring any alterations or improvements to be made thereon; not to commit or permit waste thereof; not to commit, suffer, or knowingly permit any act upon the Property in violation of law or which constitutes a nuisance under applicable law. 2. Charges; Liens. Trustor shall pay at least ten days before delinquency all taxes and assessments affecting the Property, including assessments on appurtenant water stock; when due, all encumbrances, charges, and liens, with interest, on the Property or any part thereof, which appear to be prior or superior hereto; all costs, fees, and expenses of this Deed of Trust. Trustor shall give prompt sufficient notice to Beneficiary of any default under any mortgage, deed of trust or other security agreement with a lien on the Property to provide Beneficiary with adequate time to protect its legal interests. 3. Hazard Insurance. Trustor shall keep the improvements and personal property now existing or hereafter erected on the Property insured against loss by fire, vandalism and malicious mischief by a policy of standard fire and extended all-risk insurance with sufficient policy limits to cover the full costs of repair or replacement. Subject to the rights of senior mortgagees, the insurance policy shall be issued in the name of the Trustor and the Beneficiary, as their interests appear. The insurance policy shall contain an endorsement which provides that any proceeds shall be disbursed and used to repair or rebuild any such improvements so damaged or destroyed. The full replacement value of the improvements to be insured hereunder shall be determined by the company issuing the policy at the time the policy is initially obtained. 4. Defense of Security. Trustor agrees to appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee; and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of evidence of title and attorneys’ fees in a reasonable sum, in any such action or proceeding in which Beneficiary or Trustee may appear. 5. Reimbursement of Costs. Trustor agrees to pay immediately and without demand all reasonable sums expended by Beneficiary or Trustee pursuant to the provisions hereof, with interest from date of expenditure at the maximum amount allowed by law in effect at the date hereof. Page 573 of 585 -4- 6. Right to Cure. Should Trustor fail to make any payment or to do any act as herein provided, then Beneficiary or Trustee, but without obligation so to do and with 10 business days (for payment defaults) and 30 days (for non payment defaults) notice to or demand upon Trustor and without releasing Trustor from any obligation hereof, may make or do the same in such manner and to such extent as either may deem necessary to protect the security hereof, Beneficiary or Trustee being authorized to enter upon said Property for such purposes; appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee; pay, purchase, contest, or compromise any encumbrance, charge, or lien which in the judgment of either appears to be prior or superior hereto; and, in exercising any such powers, or in enforcing this Deed of Trust by judicial foreclosure, pay necessary expenses, employ counsel, and pay reasonable attorneys’ fees. Beneficiary may make or cause to be made reasonable entries upon and inspections of the Property, subject to tenant leases, provided that Beneficiary shall give Trustor notice prior to any such inspection specifying reasonable cause therefor related to Beneficiary’s interest in the Property, provided, however, that Beneficiary and Trustee will provide Trustor’s limited partners with written notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure upon receipt of such written notice. In the event the limited partner tenders a cure for Trustor’s default, such cure shall be accepted or rejected on the same basis as if made or tendered by Trustor. B. It is mutually agreed that: 1. Condemnation Award. Subject to the rights of senior mortgagees, any proceeds of any insurance on the Property or award of damages in connection with any condemnation for public use of or injury to the Property or any part thereof is hereby assigned and shall be paid to Beneficiary who may apply such moneys received by it to any indebtedness secured hereby and in such order as Beneficiary may determine, or at option of Beneficiary the entire amount so collected or any part thereof may be released to Trustor. Such application or release shall not cure or waive any default or notice of default hereunder or invalidate any act done pursuant to such notice. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if the Trustor is not then in default and proceeds are sufficient therefor, or additional funds are made available to be sufficient therefor, such proceeds shall be applied to the restoration of the Property. 2. Late Payment. By accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive its right either to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure so to pay. 3. Release and Subordination. At any time or from time to time, without liability therefor and without notice, upon written request of Beneficiary and presentation of this Deed of Trust and Note for endorsement, Trustee may reconvey all or any part of said property; consent to the making of any map or plat thereof; join in granting any easement thereon; or join in any extension agreement or any agreement subordinating the lien or charge hereof. 4. Reconveyance. Upon written request of Beneficiary stating that all sums secured hereby have been paid, upon surrender of this Deed of Trust and the Note to Trustee for cancellation, and upon payment of its fees, Trustee shall reconvey, without warranty, the Page 574 of 585 -5- Property. The recitals in any reconveyance executed under this Deed of Trust of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. 5. Rents, Issues, and Profits. As additional security, Trustor hereby gives to and confers upon Beneficiary the right, power, and authority, during the continuance of these Trusts, to collect the rents, issues, and profits of the Property, reserving unto Trustor the right, prior to any default by Trustor in payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in performance of any agreement hereunder, to collect and retain such rents, issues, and profits as they become due and payable. Upon any such default, Beneficiary may at any time without notice, either in person, by agent, or by a receiver to be appointed by a court, and without regard to the adequacy of any security for the indebtedness hereby secured, enter upon and take possession of said property or any part thereof, in its own name sue for or otherwise collect such rents, issues, and profits, including those past due and unpaid, and apply the same, less costs and expenses of operation and collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, upon any indebtedness secured hereby, and in such order as Beneficiary may determine. The entering upon and taking possession of said Property, the collection of such rents, issues, and profits, and the application thereof as aforesaid, shall not cure or waive any default or notice of default hereunder or invalidate any act done pursuant to such notice. 6. Notice. Except for any notice required under applicable law to be given in another manner, (a) any notice to Trustor provided for in this Deed of Trust shall be given by delivering it or by mailing such notice by certified mail return receipt requested addressed to Trustor at [___________], c/o Danco Communities, 5251 Ericson Way, Arcata, CA 95521 Attn: President, with copies to: [_______INVESTOR____________] Attention: [________________], or at such other address as Trustor may designate by notice to Beneficiary as provided herein, and (b) any notice to Beneficiary shall be given by certified mail return receipt requested to Beneficiary’s address stated herein or to such other address as Beneficiary may designate by notice to Trustor as provided herein. Any notice provided for in this Deed of Trust shall be deemed to have been given to Trustor or Beneficiary when given in the manner designated herein two (2) days after deposit into the United States Mail, or on the date when personally served on the Trustor or Beneficiary. 7. Assignment. Trustor shall be permitted to assign the Note and this Deed of Trust and provided such transferee agrees to assume Trustor’s obligations under the Note and this Deed of Trust, the Note shall not become due and payable. 8. Powers of Sale. Upon default by Trustor in payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in performance of any agreement hereunder, after the expiration of applicable notice and cure periods, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. In the event of default, Beneficiary may employ counsel to enforce payment of the obligations secured hereby, and shall execute or cause the Trustee to execute a written notice of such default and of its election to cause to be sold the Property to satisfy the obligations hereof, and shall cause such notice to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of each county wherein the Property or some part thereof is situated. Page 575 of 585 -6- Prior to publication of the notice of sale, Beneficiary shall deliver to Trustee this Deed of Trust and the Note or other evidence of indebtedness which is secured hereby, together with a written request for the Trustee to proceed with a sale of the Property described herein, pursuant to the provisions of law and this Deed of Trust. Notice of sale having been given as then required by law, and not less than the time then required by law having elapsed after recordation of such notice of default, Trustee, without demand on Trustor, shall sell the Property at the time and place fixed by it in said notice of sale, either as a whole or in separate parcels and in such order as it may determine, at public auction to the highest bidder for cash in lawful money of the United States, payable at time of sale. Trustee may postpone sale of all or any portion of the Property by public announcement at such time and place of sale, and from time to time thereafter may postpone such sale by public announcement at the time and place fixed by the preceding postponement. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser its deed conveying the property so sold, but without any covenant or warranty, express or implied. The recitals in such deed of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. Any person, including Trustor, Trustee, or Beneficiary, may purchase at such sale. After deducting all costs, fees, and expenses of Trustee and of this Deed of Trust, including cost of evidence of title and reasonable attorneys’ fees in connection with sale, Trustee shall apply the proceeds of sale to payment of all sums expended under the terms hereof, not then repaid; all other sums then secured hereby; and the remainder, if any, to the person or persons legally entitled thereto. 9. Trustor’s Right to Reinstate. Notwithstanding Beneficiary’s acceleration of the sums secured by this Deed of Trust due to Trustor’s breach, Trustor shall have the right to have any proceedings begun by Beneficiary to enforce this Deed of Trust discontinued at any time prior to five days before sale of the Property pursuant to the power of sale contained in this Deed of Trust or at any time prior to entry of a judgment enforcing this Deed of Trust if: (a) Trustor pays Beneficiary all sums which would be then due under this Deed of Trust if the Note had no acceleration provision; (b) Trustor cures all breaches of any other covenants or agreements of Trustor contained in this Deed of Trust; (c) Trustor pays all reasonable expenses incurred by Beneficiary and Trustee in enforcing the covenants and agreements of Trustor contained in this Deed of Trust, and in enforcing Beneficiary’s and Trustee’s remedies as provided herein, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees; and (d) Trustor takes such action as Beneficiary may reasonably require to assure that the lien of this Deed of Trust, Beneficiary’s interest in the Property and Trustor’s obligation to pay the sums secured by this Deed of Trust shall continue unimpaired. Upon such payment and cure by Trustor, this Deed of Trust and the obligations secured hereby shall remain in full force and effect as if no acceleration had occurred. 10. Successors and Assigns. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and binds all parties hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors, successors, and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the Note secured hereby; or, if the Note has been pledged, the pledgee thereof. In this Deed of Trust, whenever the context so requires, the singular number includes the plural. Page 576 of 585 -7- 11. Other Sales, Actions, or Proceedings. Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other deed of trust or of any action or proceeding in which Trustor, Beneficiary, or Trustee shall be a party unless brought by Trustee. 12. Substitution of Trustee. Beneficiary may from time to time or at any time substitute a Trustee or Trustees to execute the trust hereby created, and when any such substitution has been filed for record in the office of the Recorder of the county in which the Property is situated, it shall be conclusive evidence of the appointment of such Trustee or Trustees, and such new Trustee or Trustees shall succeed to all of the powers and duties of the Trustee or Trustees named herein. 15. Subordination. Trustor’s indebtedness evidenced by the Note is and shall be subordinate in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all amounts then due and payable (including, but not limited to, all amounts due and payable by virtue of any default or acceleration or upon maturity) with respect to: (i) [senior construction loan TBD]. 16. Extended Use Agreement. In order to receive an allocation of federal low-income housing tax credits, Trustor will be required to record against the Real Property in the real property records of the County in which the Property is located, an “extended low-income housing commitment” (as defined in Section 42(h)(6)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”)) (“Extended Use Agreement”). Beneficiary acknowledges and agrees that, in the event of a foreclosure of its interest under this Deed of Trust or delivery by the Trustor of a deed in lieu thereof (collectively, a “Foreclosure”), Beneficiary agrees to comply with the following rule contained in Section 42(h)(6)(E)(ii) of the Code: For a period of three (3) years from the date of Foreclosure, with respect to any unit that had been regulated by the Extended Use Agreement, (i) none of the eligible tenants occupying those units at the time of Foreclosure may be evicted or their tenancy terminated (other than for good cause, including but not limited to, the tenants’ ineligibility pursuant to regulations of Section 42 of the Code), (ii) nor may any rent be increased except as otherwise permitted under Section 42 of the Code. [Signatures appear on next page] Page 577 of 585 -8- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Trustor has executed this Deed of Trust as of the date set forth above. TRUSTOR: Page 578 of 585 -9- NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ____________ On _________________, 201__, before me, ____________________________________, a notary public, personally appeared __________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. _______________________________________ [Seal] Notary Public Page 579 of 585 ATTACHMENT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Page 580 of 585 Attachment 2_Disposition Agrmt Danco-City of Ukiah-2021_Draft.docxDraft Disposition Agreement Danco-City of Ukiah.2021 Page 581 of 585 Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item No: 13.c. MEETING DATE/TIME: 3/3/2021 ITEM NO: 2019-62 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Receive Updates on City Council Committee and Ad Hoc Assignments, and, if Necessary, Consider Modifications to Assignments and/or the Creation/Elimination of Ad Hoc(s). DEPARTMENT: City Clerk PREPARED BY: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk PRESENTER: Mayor Crane and Various Councilmembers ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2021 City Council Special Assignments Summary: City Council members will provide reports and updates on their committee and ad hoc assignments. If necessary, the Council may consider modifications. Background: City Council members are assigned to a number of committees and ad hoc activities. These assignments are included as Attachment 1. Discussion: Previously, the City Council discussed having more time allocated to reporting on committee and ad hoc activities. Often, the Council Reports section of the regular agenda is rushed due to impending business (i.e., public hearings), and not enough time is afforded for reports beyond community activities. In an effort to foster regular updates on committee and ad hoc assignments, this item is being placed on the agenda to provide the City Council members an expanded opportunity to report on assignments and modify assignments as necessary. Recommended Action: Receive report(s). The Council will consider modifications to committee and ad hoc assignments along with the creation/elimination ad hoc(s). BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: No CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A FINANCING SOURCE: N/A PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A COORDINATED WITH: N/A Page 582 of 585 2021 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY/REGIONAL OnGoing One + Alternate MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Disaster Council Shall meet a minimum of once a year at a time and place designated upon call of the chair Place designated upon call of the chair or, if she/he is unavailable or unable to call such meeting, the first vice chair and then the City Manager or her/his designee. Office of Emergency Management 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 467-5765 - Tami Bartolomei Develop any necessary emergency and mutual aid plans, agreements, ordinances, resolutions, rules, and regulations. Orozco Duenas- Alternate Tami Bartolomei, Office of Emergency Management Coordinator; 467-5765 tbartolomei@cityofukiah.com Greater Ukiah Business & Tourism Alliance 3rd Tuesday of month, 11:30 a.m. 200 S School St. Ukiah, CA 95482 200 S School St. Ukiah, CA 95482 Promotes tourism and works to strengthen and promote the historic downtown and businesses within the greater Ukiah area Duenas Rodin - Alternate Shannon Riley,Deputy City Manager; 467-5793 sriley@cityofukiah.com Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG) 1st Monday of month, 1:30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers 501 Low Gap Road Ukiah, CA Executive Director 367 N. State Street, Ste. 206 Ukiah, CA 95482 463-1859 Plan and allocate State funding, transportation, infrastructure and project County wide Brown Rodin- Alternate Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 teriksen@cityofukiah.com Mendocino County Inland Water and Power Commission (IWPC) 2nd Thursday of month, 6:00 p.m. Civic Center 300 Seminary Avenue conference room 5 IWPC Staff P.O. Box 1247 Ukiah, CA 95482 391-7574 - Candace Horsley Develops coordination for water resources and current water rights: Potter Valley project - Eel River Diversion Orozco Brown- Alternate Sean White,Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 swhite@cityofukiah.com Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority (MSWMA) 3rd Thursday of every other month (varies), 10:00 a.m. Willits Council Chambers Solid Waste Director 3200 Taylor Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 468-9710 County-wide Solid Waste JPA Brown Duenas- Alternate Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 teriksen@cityofukiah.com Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA) Board of Directors Last Wednesday of month, 1:30 p.m. Alternating locations - Ukiah Conference Center or Fort Bragg, or Point Arena Executive Director 241 Plant Road Ukiah, CA 95482 462-1422 County-wide bus transportation issues and funding Duenas Orozco - Alternate Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 teriksen@cityofukiah.com North Coast Opportunities (NCO)4th Wednesday of month, 2 p.m. Alternating locations - Ukiah and Lakeport Ross Walker, Governing Board Chair North Coast Opportunities 413 North State Street Ukiah, CA 95482 Assist low income and disadvantaged people to become self reliant Bartolomei (appointed 12/19/18) Tami Bartolomei, Community Services Administrator; 467-5765 tbartolomei@cityofukiah.com North Coast Rail Authority (NCRA)2nd Wednesday of month, 10:30 a.m.Various Locations - announced 419 Talmage Road, Suite M Ukiah, CA 95482 463-3280 Provides a unified and revitalized rail infrastructure meeting the freight and passenger needs of the region Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager Shannon Riley,Deputy City Manager; 467-5793 sriley@cityofukiah.com Russian River Watershed Association (RRWA) 4th Thursday of month, 9:00 a.m. (only 5 times a year) Windsor Town Hall Russian River Watershed Association Attn: Daria Isupov 425 South Main St., Sebastopol, CA 95472 666-4857 Consider issues related to Russian river - plans projects and funding requests Rodin Brown- Alternate Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 teriksen@cityofukiah.com Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) 2nd Thursday of month, 1:30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers; 501 Low Gap Road Ukiah, CA County Executive Office Nicole French 501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1010 Ukiah, CA 95482 463-4441 GSA serves as the Groundwater Sustainability Agency in the Ukiah Valley basin Crane Orozco- Alternate Sean White, Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 swhite@cityofukiah.com COUNTY/REGIONAL One + Staff Alternate MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Economic Development & Financing Corporation (EDFC) 2nd Thursday of month, 2:00 p.m. Primarily 631 S. Orchard Street (location varies) Executive Director 631 South Orchard Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 467-5953 Multi-agency co-op for economic development and business loan program Riley (appointed 12/19/18) Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager; 467-5793 sriley@cityofukiah.com Sun House Guild ex officio 2nd Tuesday of month, 4:30 p.m. Sun House 431 S. Main St. Ukiah, CA 431 S. Main Street Ukiah, CA 95482 467-2836 Support and expand Grace Hudson Museum Orozco Neil Davis- Alternate David Burton, Museum Director; 467-2836 dburton@cityofukiah.com Continued - COUNTY/REGIONAL One + Staff Alternate MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Mendocino Youth Project JPA Board of Directors 3rd Wednesday of month, 7:45 a.m. 776 S. State Street Conference Room Mendocino Co. Youth Project 776 S. State Street, Ste. 107 Ukiah, CA 95482 707-463-4915 Targets all youth with a focus on drug and alcohol prevention, healthy alternatives and empowering youth to make healthy choices Cedric Crook, Patrol Lieutenant Cedric Crook, Patrol Lieutenant Nob; 463- 6771; ccrook@cityofukiah.com Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) 4th Thursday of month, 9:00 a.m. (see NCPA calendar) Roseville, CA and other locations 651 Commerce Drive Roseville, CA 95678 916-781-4202 Pool of public utilities for electric generation and dispatch Crane Grandi - Alternate Mel Grandi, Electric Utility Director; 463-6295 mgrandi@cityofukiah.com 1 2/18/2021 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 583 of 585 2021 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL ASSIGNMENTS LOCAL/COUNTY/REGIONAL/LIASONS OnGoing One or Two Council and/or Staff MTG DATE/TIME LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Adventist Health Community Advisory Council Quarterly: Aug. 27, 6:45 a.m. Nov 5, 6:45 a.m. 275 Hospital Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 275 Hospital Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 707-463-7623 Allyne Brown - Allyne.Brown@ah.org Provides the Adventist Health Ukiah Valley (AHUV) Governing Board and Administration with advice, support, and suggestions on matter of importance to Mendocino, Lake and Sonoma Counties. Brown Rodin - Alternate Kristine Lawler, City Clerk, 463-6217 klawler@cityofukiah.com League of California Cities Redwood Empire Legislative Committee Prior to Division Meetings, meets 3x in person and then via conference call Various locations that are announced Redwood Empire League President; Public Affairs Program Manager (916) 658-8243 Elected city officials and professional city staff attend division meetings throughout the year to share what they are doing and advocate for their interests in Sacramento Rodin Orozco-Alternate Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221 ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com City Selection Committee Called as required by the Clerk of the Board BOS Conference Room 501 Low Gap Rd. Rm. 1090 Ukiah, CA C/O: BOS 501 Low Gap Rd., Rm 1090 Ukiah, CA 95482 463-4441 Makes appointments to LAFCO and Airport Land Use Commission Mayor Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217 klawler@cityofukiah.com Investment Oversight Committee Varies Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 Reviews City investments, policies, and strategies Crane Orozco, Alternate Alan Carter, Treasurer Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463-6220 dbuffalo@cityofukiah.com Library Advisory Board 3rd Wednesdays of alternate months; 1:00 p.m. Various Mendocino County Libraries Ukiah County Library 463-4491 Review library policy and activities Supervisor Mulheren Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217; klawler@cityofukiah.com Ukiah Players Theater Board of Directors 3rd Tuesday of month, 6:00 p.m 1041 Low Gap Rd Ukiah, CA 95482 462-1210 1041 Low Gap Rd Ukiah, CA 95482 462-1210 To oversee the activities, organization and purpose of the Ukiah Players Theater Greg Owen, Airport Manager (appointed 12/19/18) Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217 klawler@cityofukiah.com Ukiah Unified School District (UUSD) Committee Quarterly 511 S. Orchard, Ste. D Ukiah, CA 95482 511 S. Orchard Ukiah, CA 95482 Information exchange with UUSD Board Chair, Mayor, Superintendent, and City Manager Mayor, City Manager and Police Chief Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221 ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com Russian River Flood Control District (RRFCD) Liaison 1st Monday of month, 5:30 p.m. 151 Laws Ave.,Suite D Ukiah, CA 151 Laws Ave., Ukiah, CA 95482; rrfc@pacific.net; 462-5278 Proactively manage the water resources of the upper Russian River for the benefit of the people and environment of Mendocino County White/Orozco Sean White, Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 swhite@cityofukiah.com HHSA Advisory Board 2nd Wednesday of month; 9:00 a.m. Big Sur Room County Department of Social Services Executive Director Jackie Williams - 462-1934 c/o Ford St. Project 139 Ford St. Ukiah CA 95482 Discussions and possible work on health and human service issues Brown - Liaison Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager; 467- 5793 sriley@cityofukiah.com Mendocino County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) 1st Monday of month, 9:00 a.m.Board of Supervisors Chambers Executive Director 200 S. School Street, Ste. 2 Ukiah, CA 95482 463-4470 Required by legislation - planning spheres of influence, annexation, service areas, and special districts (positions not active) Crane Rodin Craig Schlatter, Director of Community Development; 463-6219; cschlatter@cityofukiah.com Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission As needed BOS Conference Room 501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1090, Ukiah, CA Mendocino County Executive Office 501 Low Gap Rd. Rm. 1010 Ukiah, CA 95482 To formulate a land use compatibility plan, provide for the orderly growth of the airport and the surrounding area, and safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity Owen/Schlatter Greg Owen, Airport Manager; 467-2855; gowen@cityofukiah.com Craig Schlatter, Director of Community Development; 463-6219; cschlatter@cityofukiah.com Mendocino County 1st District Liaison 1st Wednesdays of month, 8:00 a.m. Civic Center Annex conference room #5 411 West Clay St. Ukiah, CA 95482 Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 To coordinate activities and policy development with the City's 1st District Supervisor Brown Crane- Alternate Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221; ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com LOCAL/COUNTY/REGIONAL/LIASONS OnGoing One or Two Council and/or Staff MTG DATE/TIME LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Fire Executive Committee 2nd Wednesdays of month, 3:45 p.m. Ukiah Valley Conference Center, 200 S. School Street Ukiah, CA Stephanie Abba Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 sabba@cityofukiah.com Per the recently adopted agreement between the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley Fire Protection District Orozco/Brown Doug Hutchison, Fire Chief; 463-6263; dhutchison@cityofukiah.com Mendocino County 2nd District Liaison Monthly; TBD Civic Center Annex conference room #5 411 West Clay St. Ukiah, CA 95482 Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 To coordinate activities and policy development with the County's 2nd District Supervisor Brown Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221; ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com STANDING COMMITTEES MTG DATE/TIME LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Equity and Diversity TBD Virtual Meeting Room (link to be created) Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 Improve diversity and equity in the City’s workforce and municipal services Orozco/Duenas Traci Boyl, City Manager's Office Management Analyst; 467-5720 tboyl@cityofukiah.com 2 2/18/2021 Page 584 of 585 COMMITTEE ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Electric Grid Operational Improvements Crane/Orozco Mel Grandi, Electric Utility Director; 463-6295 mgrandi@cityofukiah.com Trench Cut Policy Development Crane/Brown Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 teriksen@cityofukiah.com Budget Development Best Practices and Financial Policy For FY 21/22 Budget Crane/Brown Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463-6220 dbuffalo@cityofukiah.com Sheri Mannion, Human Resource Director/Risk Manager; 463-6272, smannion@cityofukiah.com Advance Planning & Policy for Sphere of Influence (SOI), Municipal Service Review (MSR), Annexation, Tax Sharing, Detachment, and Out of Area Service Agreements Crane/Rodin Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager 463-6221 ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467-5793 sriley@cityofukiah.com Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director 463-6219 cschlatter@cityofukiah.com Sean White, Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 swhite@cityofukiah.com Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 teriksen@cityofukiah.com Mel Grandi, Electric Utility Director; 463-6295 mgrandi@cityofukiah.com Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463-6220 dbuffalo@cityofukiah.com 2021 Electric Rate Study Crane/Duenas Mel Grandi, Electric Utility Director; 463‐6295 mgrandi@cityofukiah.com Housing Element and Implementation Review Rodin/Orozco Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director 463-6219 cschlatter@cityofukiah.com Planning Commissioner Appointment Process Crane/Rodin Craig Schlatter,Community Development Director 463‐6219 cschlatter@cityofukiah.com Darcy Vaughn, Assistant City Attorney 462‐6846 dvaughn@cityofukiah.onmicrosoft.com UVSD/ City Relations Ad hoc committee to address specific issues with the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District, including discussion of overall sewer system service delivery policies, operating policy revisions, potential revisions to the current Operating Agreement, and cost sharing Crane/Brown Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463‐6220 dbuffalo@cityofukiah.com Sean White, Water Resources Director 463‐5712 swhite@cityofukiah.com 2021 AD HOC COMMITTEES 3 2/18/2021 Page 585 of 585