Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-11-16 Packet CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 November 16, 2005 6:00 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. INTRODUCTIONS None 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Regular Meeting Minutes of September 21,2005 1 RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. ItemS may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations a. Approval of Disbursements for Month of October 2005 b. Rejection of Claim for Damages Received from Dan Sevier and Referral to Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund c. Rejection of Claim for Damages Received from Marc Tosca and Referral to Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund d. Notification of a Vendor Name Change on a Previously Reported Purchase Awarded to Innoprise Software, Inc. e. Notification of Bid to AIIstar Fire Equipment in the Amount of $5,016 Plus Tax and Shipping for the Purchase of 24 Lengths of Fire Hose f. Approval of Notice of Completion for Pavement Rehabilitation and Traffic Signal Loop Replacement, Specification No. 05-07 g. Adoption of Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Ukiah Amending Section 3707.1 of the Ukiah City Code Requiring Sewer Services to be Charged to the Customer Receiving Water Service h. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Destruction of Certain Records (Public Utilities Department) i. Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Sign City of Ukiah Contracts and other Documents j. Adoption of Resolution Adjusting Junior Fees for the Ukiah Municipal Golf Course w AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Bom Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARING (6:15 P.M.) a. Continuance of Minor Subdivision Map- Subdivision Requirement Exception Variance No. 05-19 Sm a, UNFINISHED BUSINESS Consideration and Possible Approval of Comment Letter Regarding the Hop Kiln/Ryder Homes Project to the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors on the Hop Kiln/Ryder Homes Project b. Discussion and Direction Regarding Hydrology Study of Hopkiln Housing Project Water Use 10. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and Possible Adoption of Resolution Supporting Marriage Equality- Councilmembers McCowen and Rodin b. Award of Contract for Alternate Route Analysis for Orchard Avenue Extension c. Discussion and Direction Concerning the Use of Structural Engineering Consultants to Plan-Check Large and Complex Building Permit Applications 11. COUNCIL REPORTS 12. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK REPORTS 13. CLOSED SESSION a. Conference with Labor Negotiator~ Government Code ~i54957.6 Employee Negotiations: Electric, Miscellaneous, and Direct Units Negotiator: City Manager b. Conference with Real Property Negotiator~ Government Code ~54956.8 Property: 120-A Leslie Street City Negotiator: Candace Horsley Negotiating Parties: City of Ukiah/Vernon Watkins Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 14. ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda. Dated this 10th day of November, 2005. Marie Ulvila, City Clerk The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting Minutes CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 September 21,2005 1. ROLL CALL- Convened at 6:10 PM Present: Councilmembers Crane, McCowen, Baldwin, and Absent: Councilmember Rodin. Staff present: City Manager Horsley, Fire Chief Community/General Services Director Sangiacomo, Clerk Ulvila. iku. :ity Attorney Rapport, Stump, and City 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PROCLAMATIONS/PRES 3a. Proclamation: October as Domestic Vil Mayor Ashiku read the Proclamation proclaiming Awareness Month" in the City of Gary Hudson, Under-Sheriff of Mendi member of the Domestic Violence Proclamation and discussed efforts in education to victims violence. Ana Araiza invite~ Pro 2OO5. Month6: :!8 PM 2005 as "Domestic Violence ', Chairm ect Sanctuary, and County, accepted the to provide assistance and f's activities planned for October 4, 3b. Statu Katri ~ponse and Relief Effort- Fire Chief Fir, Forces the Office assist in Cali effort. He also a relationshi Latipow lergency t'S of California's eight Search and Rescue Task rricane Katrina victims. He explained his work with (OES) in Sacramento over the past several weeks to effort. He noted that this will be a long term recovery donations received and the possibility of the City establishing with a community in Louisiana to provide assistance. Bob Jordan, Reg al Manager of the Mendocino County United Way, discussed ways in which local communities can provide assistance to the families and individuals displaced by the hurricanes. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Re_clular Meetinq Minutes of June 1~ 2005 6:40:03 PM Councilmember McCowen recommended a correction to page 5; that he spelling of the speaker's name in the fourth paragraph should be spelled "Darca Nicholson". He also noted a correction to page 3 that the spelling of the speaker's name in the second to the City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 1 of 9 last paragraph should be spelled "Alea Waters". M/S McCowen/Baldwin approving the Regular Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2005 as corrected, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Crane, McCowen, Baldwin, and Mayor Ashiku. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. b. Re_qular Meetin_cl Minutes of August 177 2005 City Clerk Ulvila noted a correction on page 3; that in the last be spelled "August". the month should M/S McCowen/Crane approving the Regular Meeting corrected, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Ce Baldwin, and Mayor Ashiku. NOES' None. ABSTAI Rodin. e. AB: August 17, 2005 as Crane, McCowen, "Councilmember c. Regular Me 7 City Clerk Ulvila noted that some formatting heading of the minutes needs to be changed t( Minutes". "Councilmembers ;hould be inclu~ to the The the title, "Regular Meeting the second "1. Roll Call". M/S McCowen/Baldwin approving carried by the following roll call .vote: AY and Mayor Ashiku. NOES: None. AB~ Meeting September 7, 2005, McCowen, Baldwin, IT: Councilmember Rodin. d. Sl~ecial Mi a~ Electric We 14 City Clerk Ulvila rec~ ~e minutes Ukiah dley Sanitation District and 6:43:15 PM ued to the next meeting. 1 Mayor Decision". 6. CALEND City Clerl la advised 'M ,s "b" and "c" is the same item, with different titles. Councilmeml: Calendar for furth that items "6d" and "6g" be pulled from the Consent Mayor Ashiku nc that those items would be agendized as items "10h" and "10i" respectively, under New Business on the agenda. M/S McCowen/Baldwin approving the Consent Calendar items "a" through "g" as follows: a. Approved Disbursements for the Month of August 2005; b. Informed the Council of the Purchase of Clarifier Media Retainer Screens from US Filter, a Sole Supplier, in the Amount of $7,822.65; c. Received Notification to Council on the Purchase of Clarifier Media Retainer Screens from US Filter, a Sole Supplier, in the Amount of $7.822.65; City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 2 of 9 ¥ ii~ iii I I i i i ii ¥ I12 ¥I~,~IIii~I I~I I I I ~v ~ I~ ~. ~iv~d ~p~ t~ ~it~ ~n~il ~rdin~ ~q~i~iti~n ~f ~i~ from ~p~n~r Brewer for Management of the 2006 Sundays in the Park Conce~ Series in the Amount of $7,500; f. Awarded Bid to TOMARK Spo~s for the Purchase of Bleachers for the Ukiah So~ball Complex in an Amount of $18,815.94; i I I~I IVl l~V~ I III~I~ Vl ~I~ iVl I I~II~I III I I v~ ~V~ I I II vVV~l V ~I v~$11 I III v~V~Vl I I ~V III II I I II ~ v ~ ~, Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilm~ Baldwin, and Mayor Ashiku. NOES: None. ABSTAIN' None Rodin. Crane, McCowen, Councilmember 7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITl Dane Wilkins discussed the amount of money Orleans. hut victims in New Ana Araiza, spoke regarding hiring bilingual poi Mayor Ashiku stated that the Police, ~partment is to the Police Department. hard to recruit local residents Richard Johnson, spoke regarding hir ;rs. City Manager Horsle~ certified bilingual an, interpreters by that 20% office it is Ukiah Police Department is She also discussed the use of Ukiah Morrison add those the need for marijuana dispensaries for Patri uff spoke marijuana dispensaries in the City. Lacretia org. October 26th. ussed th( managing director of the Martin Luther King Jr. ects their organization has completed and is working on for Michael Toms disc d the possibility of the City of Ukiah partnering with a "sister city" in Louisiana and req the Council select the city of Mandeville which is located south of the city of Coverington, whereas Chief Latipow suggested the city of Bogalusa, Louisiana. Councilmember McCowen stated that Council needs to know what the state of Louisiana wants them to do and Chief Latipow will advise the Council on that matter. 8. PUBLIC HEARING (6:15 P.M.) a. Minor Subdivision Map-Subdivision Requirement Exception No. 05-19(Continued) 7:13:49 PM It was reported that the City's Planning Department, with the concurrence of the applicants, City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 3 of 9 requests this item be continued to the City Council meeting scheduled for October 5, 2005. Council concurred with that request. 9a. Continued Discussion and Direction Reflardin.q Application of LAFCO Policy to Annexation of Property in Brush Street Trian.clle?:14:25 ?M City Attorney Rapport advised that Staff met with Mr. McMichael on September 14, 2005 and a recap of the meeting is contained in the Staff Report. Of particular concern is an interpretation of an existing I_AFCO policy as applied to the proposed annexation into the City of 39 acres located within the Brush Street Triangle. reviewed the options identified in the Staff Report that would satisfy the I_AFCO poi explained that the options are not exclusive and Council may want to pursue a Iion of options. Frank McMichael, Executive Director of LAFCO, a portion of LAFCO's powers and duties and sugg, solution between LAFCO and the City to the vari~ raised He noted that if the City Council is in agreemen :h this §uggestion, make a strong recommendation to the and he felt would be agreeable to this process. Staff with copies of of working on a ing annexation. sure he can )n Considerable discussion followed erning ,olicies and information. Mr. McMichael advised that Section The agreement process is between Ci there is a good possibility that such an thatthe Io through this process. It was his opinion that ched. Public Comment 0 54 PM John Mayfield, develop an annexation and City Council to ce annexati for ann stated he recommended the City the City of Ukiah Planning Commission property into the City. Upon questioning by ed that a C-1 zoning classification would be acceptable Diane Z~ member onseller's neighborhood, expressed her concern with preserving 'agonsell neighborhood and how the Rural Communities Housing Development (RCHDC) proposed housing project would impact the Wagonseller's n td with regard to increased traffic and the lack of open space and parks for its res s and children. She advocated a development plan be submitted for Council's consi~ ~n prior to annexation. Lee Howard, 3900 Parducci Road, expressed concern for the lack of planning for the areas in the Sphere Of Influence. Susan Shurer, member of the Wagonseller's Association, stated it was her opinion that the area is already congested and that the City and County should work together regarding planning issues. Public Comment Closed: 8:23:41 PM City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 4 of 9 Councilmember Baldwin expressed concern that the RCHDC project would impact the City's Police Department, when it is already understaffed. It was the consensus of the City Council to direct City Staff to work with County staff to resolve issues concerning the Sphere of Influence, annexation, and planned developments. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9b. lnterim Urgency Ordinance Imposing a Moratorium Within the Downtown Business District and on Perki .~d from Jul~ 2005 and Councilmember McCowen stated that he has been Commission (FPPC) that he should refrain from has ruled whether he has a conflict of interest. It to continue this item until a response from the C is in thi ~ens~ ~ceived. da Businesses Streets PM Political Practices until the FPPC e City Council 10. NEW BUSINESS 10a. Discussion of Possible Licensure of T~ City Manager Horsley explained ~ City has of citizens involved with the Am~ ~cer Society licensure of tobacco retailers within thl The tobacco use by minors and is recom enforcement mechanism against retailer etailers in the Limits by a concerned group garding a process for ~d in dissuading of an Ordinance as an to minors. 8:56: ! 0 PM Members of the p! enforcement mechar~ Shannon L~ , Cha in support wh' bacco ordinance" that would provide an selling tobacco to minors, included: ns, Tami Jorgensen, and Matt Ferrick. The co disc~ as well a process, as noted in the Staff Report, was .~nt issues. M/S ~1 Council for i at City Staff to bring the "Tobacco Ordinance" back to next meeting. Councilmember ;n provided suggested changes to some the findings that were made, to include: ~st "Whereas" on page one, to read, "Whereas, despite these restrictions, minors ,'ontinue to easily obtain cigarettes and other tobacco products, including through illegal sales." The second "Whereas" on page two, to read, "Whereas, within the City of Ukiah, a youth-buying survey in 2005 showed that 32% of retailers unlawfully sold tobacco products to minors within the City". He also recommended the third "Whereas" on page two be deleted from the Ordinance because there is no citation for it. He provided a recommendation that the second line of the last paragraph beginning with "Now Therefore", read "enacting this ordinance, to monitor progress in restricting youth access", and that the last two lines of that paragraph be reviewed by the City Attorney for clarification. City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 5 of 9 City Attorney Rapport advised that he would like to conduct a legal review of the ordinance so as to advise Council at the next meeting. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Crane, McCowen, Baldwin, and Mayor Ashiku. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. Recessed: 9:40 PM Reconved:9:42:]0 PM 10d. Discussion Re Potential Ban on Certain and Facilities-- Rodin Councilmember McCowen stated he received opposed to banning a specific breed of dog from Cil From City Events from the public Mayor Ashiku voiced is opposition to bannin~ statistics concerning dog biting incidents in )ecific breed of dog 'red as to City Attorney Rapport discussed state legislation have the authority to ban a certain of dog. H prohibit certain animals from certain or events. provide further information to Council ~ration. ~stioned whether the City would the City's authority to by Council, he would Councilmember Baldwin voiced his con; due to the volume of p people Concerts in the Park Series ng close together. Public Comm; ?M Members of .= ti and Loretta Lazar and Karen Seydel ~g training dogs and how to approach them. Publ ,mment cio A brief di within the Ci setting a polic ion fo( ard to obtaining the statistics on dog biting incidents on the situations when dogs can become a problem and issue. Councilmember noted that currently, dogs are prohibited from the Alex Thomas Plaza and recommended that dogs be prohibited from the six Sundays in the Concert park series and at the Sun House Park. It was the consensus of the City Council to continue the matter to the next meeting so that further information could be obtained. 10b. Discussion Regarding the Concept of Form Based Zoninq Ordinance]O:]4:08 Councilmember McCowen stated that per the advice of the Fair Political Practices Commission's (FPPC) letter, he should not participate in discussion of this matter. He City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 6 of 9 provided a synopsis of the FPPC's letter. City Attorney Rapport recommended the matter be continued until such time as he can review the FPPC's letter concerning a possible conflict of interest by Councilmembers and provide a legal opinion to Council. 10c. Discussion and Consideration of Request for Proposals for Playground Ec~uiDment at Todd Grove Park~ Oak Manor Park~ Vinewood Park~ and Orchard Park] 0: ] 9:24 PM Community/General Services Director Sangiacomo advise~ the recent State Resource Bond Acts, the City of Ukiah is Grant Funds which are dispersed statewide on a per-ca receive a minimum per capita allocation of a and $220,000 under Proposition 40. The City appl playground equipment in the current fiscal year b the passage of Allocation The City of Ukiah will Proposition 12 the purchase of Discussion followed regarding the condition safety guidelines, the process for replacing the e: colors for the playground equipment rather than bri ors. ~round ADA and sell ~g "natural" M/S McCowen/Baldwin directing by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Ashiku. NOES: None. ABSTAI ;sue a RFP ~mbers ;ENT: ~round equipment, carried , Baldwin, and Rodin. 10e. Discussion Ri R~ M/S McCowen reimbursement employees, carried by McCowen Council Revision ution Pert; ' ' to 10:.~2:06 Policy ution 34, declaring policy regarding elected and City officials, officers, and vote: AYES: Councilmembers Crane, None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: 1 PM City Manag, resolutions Committee on at the meeting to ~ of California Cities Resolutions Packet] 0:33:] 3 'sley ad' that the City has received the League of California Cities a resolutions that will be voted on by the General Resolutions City voting delegates, Rodin and Baldwin, will be in attendance the City of Ukiah's behalf. It was the consensus of the Council that Councilmember's Rodin and Baldwin, as voting delegates to the League of California Cities, cast their vote in the best interest of the City of Ukiah. Recessed:J0:35:2! P]H Reconvened: 10:48 PM 10g. (6d.)Authorized Award of Bid to Emergency Services Consulting Inc. for Development of a Fire Department Master Plan]0:4g:4] PM City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 7 of 9 At the recommendation of City Manager Horsley, it was the consensus of Council to continue the matter to next meeting. 10h. (6g.)Authorized Award of Bid for Trailer Mounted High Pressure Breathing Air System to Mallory Firel 0:49:22 PM Fire Chief Latipow discussed his request for Council's consideration of an award of bid for one trailer mounted high pressure breathing air system is awarded to Mallory Fire of Santa Rosa. He noted that during the budget hearing process, Council approved Staff's request fur funding of this equipment. He reviewed the bid process an specifications for the system. This equipment is versatile and the City's Fire De )uld be able to utilize the equipment when responding to assistance from other enc~es. Councilmember Crane stated that he would prefer th~ have an opportunity to review long term strategy for ti He felt it important that the City Council have an to revi, so he would equipment needs. )se needs. M/S Baldwin/McCowen to award the bid for system to Mallory Fire. d high ing air Discussion followed between the City~uncil and Fir, Latipow and Captain Hilliker with regard to the compressor equip~ecent fires area, consumption of the oxygen bottles, concern that revenue fl~~!es tax m, uncertain in the next few years, a suggestion that it may be t rchase a unit with lesser capacity, the annual servicing of the be' ~ " . iate gency cooperation COlT . The motion failed roll call AYEI ~ Councilmembers McCowen and Baldwin. NOES: Crane an~ Ashiku. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN 11.COUNl Counci G ,eting today fun~ uested th that he attended a Homeless Services Planning was made of the Homeless Survey that the City endized for the next Council meeting for discussion. Councilme Power Commi on a meeting he attended of the Inland Water and ~ntial FERC and Eel River cutbacks. 12. CITY MAN CLERK REPORTS City Manager explained that the matter of the Ukiah Valley Area Plan (UVAP) will be on the next meeting's agenda for discussion. Adjourned to Closed Session:Il:39:47 PM 13. CLOSED SESSION a. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR~ Government Code ~54957.6 Employee Negotiations: Directors and Miscellaneous Units Negotiator: Candace Horsley City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 8 of 9 Reconvened: 11:50 p.m. No action taken. 14.ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:50 p.m. Marie Ulvila, City Clerk City Council Meeting of September 21,2005 Page 9 of 9 ITEM NO.: 6a DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2005 Payments made during the month of October 2005, are summarized on the attached Report of Disbursements. Further detail is supplied on the attached Schedule of Bills, representing the four (4) individual payment cycles within the month. Accounts Payable check numbers: 65322-65371, 65440-65555, 65557-65663, 65731-65835 Accounts Payable Manual check numbers: 60152-60154 Payroll check numbers: 65372-65439, 65664-65730 Payroll Manual check numbers: 65556 Void check numbers: None This report is submitted in accordance with Ukiah City Code Division 1, Chapter 7, Article 1. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Report of Disbursements for the month of October 2005. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Candace Horsley, City Manager Prepared by: Kim Sechrest, Accounts Payable Specialist Coordinated with:Mike McCann, Director of Finance and Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: Report of Disbursements APPROVED: andace H0rsl~, City Man~er KRS:WORD/AGENDAOCT05 CITY OF UKIAH REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS REGISTER OF PAYROLL AND DEMAND PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2005 Demand Payments approved: Check No. 65322-65371, 65440-65555, 65557-65663, 65731-65835, 60152-60154 FUNDS: 100 General Fund 131 Equipment Reserve Fund 140 Park Development 141 Museum Grants 143 N.E.H.1. Museum Grant 150 Civic Center Fund 200 Asset Seizure Fund 201 Asset Seizure (Drug/Alcohol) 203 H&S Education 11489 (B)(2)(A1) 204 Federal Asset Seizure Grants 205 Sup Law Enforce. Srv. Fund (SLESF) 206 Community Oriented Policing 207 Local Law Enforce. BIk Grant 220 Parking Dist. #10per & Maint 230 Parking Dist. #1 Revenue Fund 250 Special Revenue Fund 260 Downtown Business Improvement 290 Bridge Fund 301 2107 Gas Tax Fund 310 Special Aviation Fund 315 Airport Capital Improvement 330 Revenue Sharing Fund 332 Federal Emerg. Shelter Grant 333 Comm. Development Block Grant 334 EDBG 94-333 Revolving Loan 335 Community Dev. Comm. Fund 340 SB325 Reimbursement Fund 341 S.T.P. 342 Trans-Traffic Congest Relief 345 Off-System Roads Fund 410 Conference Center Fund 550 Lake Mendocino Bond 575 Garage $415,746.04 $18,815.94 $3,722.39 $800.00 $1,550.49 $805178 $527.40 $6,125.23 $3,036.60 $~,992.10 $2,OOO.OO $1,803.78 . PAYROLL PERIOD 9/25/05-10/8/05 PAYROLL CHECK NUMBERS 65372-65439 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS 25653-25794 pAyROLL PERIOD 10/09/05-10/22/05 PAYROLL CHECK NUMBERS: 65664-65730 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS 25795-25935 VOID CHECK NUMBERS: None 600 Airport 611 Sewer Construction Fund 612 City/District Sewer 615 City/District Sewer Replace 620 Special Sewer Fund (Cap Imp) 640 San Dist Revolving Fund 650 Spec San Dist Fund (Cap Imp) 652 REDIP Sewer Enterprise Fund 660 Sanitary Disposal Site Fund 661 Landfill Corrective Fund 664 Disposal Closure Reserve 670 U.S.W. Bill & Collect 678 Public Safety Dispatch 679 MESA (Mendocino Emergency Srv Auth) 695 Golf 696 Warehouse/Stores 697 Billing Enterprise Fund 698 Fixed Asset Fund 699 Special Projects Reserve 800 Electric 805 Street Lighting Fund 806 Public Benefits Charges 820 Water 840 Special Water Fund (Cap Imp) 900 Special Deposit Trust 910 Worker's Comp. Fund 920 Liability Fund 940 Payroll Posting Fund 950 General Service (Accts Recv) 960 Community Redev. Agency 962 Redevelopment Housing Fund 965 Redevelopment Cap Imprv. Fund 966 Redevelopment Debt Svc. 975 Russian River Watershed Assoc 976 Mixing Zone Policy JPA TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS TOTAL PAYROLL VENDOR CHECKS TOTAL PAYROLL CHECKS TOTAL DIRECT DEPOSIT TOTAL PAYMENTS $13,797.79 $33,434.88 $131,935.37 $450.00 $3,937.16 $23,739.37 $340.07 $5,605.88 $7,614.73 $426.69 $3,354149 $38,229.71 $945,779.43 $12,240.29 $16,056.92 $83,221.36 $474,824.73 $4,871.59 $i42,472.41 $254,593.85 $643.86 $215.35 $10,000.00 $21,825.21 $10,058.00 $2,702,594.89 $49,008.84 $127,849.80 $364,150.27 $3,243,603.80 CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK This register of Payroll and Demand Payments was duly approved by the City Council on City Clerk APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER I have examined this Register and approve same. CERTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I have audited this Register and approve for accuracy and available funds. City Manager Director of Finance O~ o o o ~° 0 rJ · o > o o o o o o o o o o 6o c0 O0 c} o 0000 o oo o oo o oo o ~° 0o o 0o 0o 0 0 o o . . o0 · o 0 · o o o o ~r~ O~ ~00 ~00 i H H ~0 ~0 . := 0 H I 0 ~ o O.., 02~m H ~D ~ . > 0 O0 O0 O0 o~oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 > o 0 000000000000000 00 , 0 00 00 , 00 00 0 ~ ~ · 0 0 ~ ~ 0 {Do 0 o~ o o o o o :> ~:>~ o °~°~ o~o o~ o~oo~ ~oo~ooo~oo~ O0 000 O0 00000000000 oo~~~oo oo o,< 0 000000 © o~ oo o o o 8oo88oo8oo8 OO OO OO 00000000000 ~oo~oo~~ ~oo~oo~oo~ HHHHHHHH~ o o r.,r} o Oo O~ ~o O~ i r.,.., o =:: o e-, m 0 ~ 0 ~HHH HH i ~J · > 12) O0 000 0000000 0000000 ~§oo oo oo~ ~ oo oo o~ oo~~oo ~'~ Lo o o o o o o c> o~ o o o 0 0 ooo oo~ O0 NHH~O 0000000 0000000 O0 O0 O0 O0 oo~oo~ o OO ~:~ O~ oo~oo~oo ~0 0 0 o~ H ~0 {J . ~0 0 0 0 0 C) C) 0 0 CO CO 0 oo oo CO 0 O0 O0 000000000000 ~~~~oo o oo o 000000000000 o 0 ~ o o~ · . . . . o o o~ 0 0 000 0 0 000 o o mmm~ ~ ~ oooo ooo~ 0 000 ... 00 ~0 ~ 0 oj 0 00 · . · , 0 mo ~oo~oo~oo~o O0 O0 O0 0 000000000000 ............ ~o~o~~O~o o~ oo ...... ...... O0 O~ O~ O~ ~oooooooooooo 000000000000 ~o i ~J . 0 0 o o O~ :>-, 0 0 OO ~ (J . ~o o > o O0 000000 000000 000000 00 0 O0 0 O0 00 00 00 ~oo~oo~o o oo oo ooooooooo O0 O0 O0 oo~oo~oo o o o 0 0 ~o~o 000000 ~ .... .. o 0~ 0 ~ ~ ~H~HO ooo o o o · 0 o oo o o 00 ~ o~oo~oo§ 0 O0 O0 000000000 ......... o~oo~oo~ ......... ~~~oo 0000000~ ......... 0000000~ ~ ~oo~oo~oo o co ~ · . ~° 0 > 0 Om: H H 0 O0 O0 0000000 00 CO ~ 00 00 00 00 00 ~q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 · 0 · 0 F.-t 0 0 0 C~ · 0 0 . 0 · O0 · 0~ 0 OH o~ ~ Ow O0 0 0 ~ o o o ooooooooooooooo o~°° o o ~ ~H~O00000000000 ~o~o~~~z~~ oo o ~0~ ~ ~o O~ OH O~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 O0 0 000000000000000000000000000~~~ ~oo~oo~oo~oo~oo~oo~oo~o~oo~oo O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 0 O0 O0 00 0 0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 0 O0 ~0 O0 , 000000000000000~000~~0000000000 0000000000000000~00~~000~~0 o ~ o o o o o · o ~ · 0 c> , 0000000000000000000000000000000000 ~0000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 rJ-I O~ rj · {2> o o o o o 120 o 0~ 0~ o o o o oooo oooo o~§o ~0~ 0~00 °~° 0000 o~ o o o · H~:O o L~ o o o ~'q o ,~ o ~0 ~ ~o o~oo o oo oooo 00~0 ~0~ · . · · ~°°~ ~~0 0 0 o~: oo ~0 ~0 ~J · o > o o o oo oo o o o oo o c~ L~ 000 00 00 ~ O0 O0 0 ~HO o ~ o · 0 ~ o 0~ o ~ {2> · o ~o~oo o oo ~ooooo oo~~o ~~o~ooo 00~00000 ~~00~ ~00~~ 0~ 0 0 0 0 O~ H ~ ~J · 0 o o oo ooooo HHNHH0 o o o oo ooo 000000000 000000000 ~00~0~ 00~~00 00000000~ d 0 OH o~ 0 00000 00 00 o o 0000 0000 ~00~ 0~0 0~ °~° ~H~O ~:o o 03 o 0 OC~, f-,4 o 0 E"-, ~0 - U ~0 OH OH o 0 ~J . o o o o o o c~ c~ o o o o o o oooooo ~ (',q o o co co o o 0 0 o o o o o o · ~° · o cq · oo o ~0 mc> o o · o o · ~-I r..q O~ r.j · 0 > 0 O0 O0 O0 000000000 0 O0 O0 0 0 0000 00000000000000000 00 00 00 o 0 O0 O0 0 000000000 ~oo~~oo ~ O0 o~ ~00~~ ,000 ~oo~oo~oo O0 O~ O0 o~o 0 0 0000 0~ O0 o~ oo~oo~§oo§~§~o~§ O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 00000000000000000 00000000000000000 00~0~~0~0 ~0~0~0~00~000~ ~000~000000~0000 NHHHNHN HHHNHHHHN 0 00 · go 00 00 00 · 0 ,-~ 0 0 C~ ~ ~0 · ~N 0 · 00 00 0 ~ 0 0 H 0 H c~ ~00000000000~00000 o o [13 u'3 0 0 o o o o o o · o o · ~ o o 00 o ~ · o o o o o o ~ r.-.t · 120 co 00000 O~ 0 H rO . c} > c> 0 u..4 ~ 0 ¢J . 0 > 0 0 H 0 0 O0 gg° CD 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 0 0 0000 D"' Ln ~ 00 (;0 O0 {'"' l~ Ln 00 CD 0 0 0 0 0 §oo~oo O0 O0 0 u.4 0 oo~ oo ooo , 0 0 · , 0 ~° o o o · o · o o , o o oo~ o o~ o~ §~o o o o Ln 0 ~.n , . o 0000 u~ u~ · ~.D U3 0 H~ o o o~ °° oo~ 0000000 o~~g~oo ~00~0~ 0~~00 000 mO00 [400 400 ON H ~.-] N H I,-I kD r,D , ~o oooo oooo oooo o o o o o o ~ o o o oooo oooo oooo oo oooo oooo oooo o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 oo§ o o o o o o · o o · o o o ~ c~ c~ · o o o o oo~ o o ooo 0 0 , ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 o o t'xl cq C~l 120 o o o o o o oo o 0 0 og o ogo o ~ ~ ogo o o ooo ... · 0 ~oo ~000 o~ O~ ~ ~0 o o o o o o 00 00 o o o o o o 120 O0 o 120 120 ~0 o o o o o o o o o , o o o , ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~0 ~0 O~ Oo ~:~ ~ 0 oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo~~~ oo o o oo 00000000000000000000 00000000000000000000 O0 Lq ~ 00 0 0 oo o 00000 000 0000000 ~o~ oo~ o~ooooo ~0~~0~0000000 00000000000000000000 0 00~ O0 Ot~ OH o oo oo oo oo oooooooooooooooo 000 0 0 oo o o ooooo oo oo~o ~o oo~o~ °°~°~o O0 O~ 0 0 ~~ ~0 O0 O0 O0 O0 0000000000000000 oo~oo~oo~oo~oo ~~0~00~0~ 00~0~~000~00 000000000~0~0000 000000000~0~0000 O~ 0 © ~00000000 0 L~ 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 00000000 0 000000000 O00~00 0 0 0 0 00000000 ~ oo~oo~ o ......... ~o~o~o 000000000 ~~0~ ~~~ oooooooo HNHHHNHH HHHHHHHN i HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH o 0 O0 O0 ~ ~ O0 000 O0 0 O0 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 O0 O0 O0 O0 ~0~0000~~~ ~0~~0000~ 0 0 o oo oo o o~ ooooo~ ooooo~ o~oo~oo 0 O0 ~88~~88oo~oo~8 0 0 O0 O0 ~0~0~00~0~ 00~00~00~000~00~ ~~ o o~~o~~~°oo o~ ~~o~oo~o~ ...0..000....00.. ~HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 0 00000000000000 00000000000000 O0 0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 0 0 00000000000000 o~o~~oo~ ~ O~ O0 ~ 0 .............. ~ ~ ~o ..... ......... ~00~~~0000 oo~oo§~oo~oo~ O0 O0 O0 O0 00000000000000 .............. o~oo~oo~oo .............. O0 O~ 0~~00~0~0 .... .......... o~oo~oo o o 7 ' O~ ~Jo oRRRRR ~o OH o ~ o {2> o o oo o o o o ~N ~n o c) o o o~ o o o o ~r~ ~ g0 o o o oo ~o~ o og ~D ~,~ 00 00 00 oog o o o oo . 0 0 , c'q ~ o o o o o o · o o · o o ~0 ~0 oo§ 0 [z.l ~ o ooo · 0 · 0 ~0 000 o o o o o o · o o IN LA · LA ~,N 00 · · 00 00 O~ O~ O0 O~ t I~ O~ 0 0 O0 O~ 0 ~00 ~00 H 0 00000 0 00 00 [13 00000 00000 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 · · 0 0 o o~~o 00000 o~~ 0~~ °~°~ o o O~ H 0 o o ~o o 0 0 o o ~o {2:> Oh ~ t~ o o~oo~oo oo o oo ~00000000~ O~ ~J · > o o o o o o o °~ ggoog oo ooooo ~°°~ oo oooo~ ooooo o o o ~° 120 o o [13 o o o o o o o o ooooo ooooo 0 0 0~0 · 0 0 o ~ ~ o o~oo~ 0 0 O~ o o o I...q · , o~ o o o · ~ o o L~ · ~ 0 · 0 , 0 0 oh [~ o o · g° c) · o o o · °~ · 0 °~ · O~ 0~ O© · 0 .0 On~ F-I LO ~ . > 0000 0000 ~°°~ o c~ c~ oooooo oooooo oo~oo 000000 00 O0 OOHH 00 00 00 · 00 · 0 00 · o o oooooo oooooo o°~°°~o o - HHHHHH0 o ~ o o o o o o o ~° oo o oo o oo o o oo o o o o oo co oo o o ~° 120 o o r'q ~ 120 O0 o o o °~ o ooo · 0 0 °~ °gg ~0 o~oo o o o o o · 0 cq c~q r~.~ · , o · o o co{Dc> I..q o o o o o ~0 0~ H r-,-] H H H o~ o o · · , · o ~0 o o 00 00 · oo Ix) mm o o 120 o §§oo~oo§~OOoo oo oo ~oo oo oo O0 O0 ~ O0 O0 ~~oo~oo~~ ~ ~ ~~~~oo oo oo o 120 > o o ~oo~oooooo o o o o o o , °~ r--t ~ <2> Cq o o · 0 12) r-q · ~ C~ r-q ,---I 0 0 I--I rj , > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (~ , , 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 ,--I ~-t 0 0 0 0 · · · © o O~ ~r.j OO3 H~ 0 0 ~q H~ ~ 0 o o o o oo~~ 000000000 ~00 ~~°° 0 0 o · , ooo °~ · o ~0 o o o · o o oo · o 0 00 0 ~ 0 ~ ~oooooom ~ O0 O0 000 O0 0 O00 120 o o oo o o 0 0 oo~ooo~oo~oo~ 00000000000000 oo~oo~oo~oo~ O0 ~ O0 ~0 o o o o o o , o o · 0 ,-~ o o ~ · o 0~ U o~oo~oo~ ~A~AAAAAA~AAA g~oo~oo~oo~o~ 0000000000000~ o~°~ ~J · > 0 O0 O0 00000000 o~oo~ooo 00000000 ~~~oo o o ?? O0 00000 °°~° ?? O0 O0 00 0 O0 0 00000000000000000 ooooooooooooooooo oooo~o o~oo~o o o HO ~o 0 00~0~ ~00 °~°°~ H HO H oo~°°~°°~°°~©oo ooooo 00000000000000000 0~~~0~0~0~ 00000 ~00000 r.~ ~HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH RR~RRRRRRRRRR~R H r.,j 8oo88oo8oo88OOoo oo oo oo 00000000000000 00000000000000 00000000000000 00 O0 0000 ~°°~ 0000 0 0 00 ~° ',,D 00 O0 O0 00 00 °g 120 00 0000000000 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 00000000000000 0 · ~° 00 · 0 00 000 O0 O0 0000000000 ooo~oo~o~ oo~oo~~ O0 O0 0 t~ 0 ~0000 ~0000 i ~ HHHHHHHHHH ~0000000000 000000 000000 ~oo~oo o o o o o o 0000 o o o o ~ c~ o o ooooo °°~° o oo o o o o co 00 00 co o o o o <2> {2) 0 0 0 0 oo~ o o o · o · o o . · -~ o · . o o o o ...... o o o · o · 0 }-t ~000000 O~ 0 ~ 0000 o o 0 O0 0 O0 O0 0000000000 0000000000 ~o~ oo oooo ~°° o o · . c~ cq · , g° o oo o o o o o~ O0 0 00000000 ~0000 O~ > <22> 0 0 o o ~ ~J . o > o o o~ o o o o o og ~o o oooo oooo o c~ o o °° · 0 . o o o L~ · 0 C~ , 0 > , o~oo o oo oooo ~°°° 0~0 Ooo ~o~ HO~O~ ~0~0 I 0 o ITEM NO. 6[~ MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REJECTION OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES RECEIVED FROM DAN SEVlER AND REFERRAL TO JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND A claim from Dan Sevier was received by the City of Ukiah on October 26, 2005 alleging property damage to his motorcycle resulting from gravel on the street and sidewalk caused by construction activities in the vicinity of the Rite Aide parking lot. The date of occurrence was July 27, 2005. Pursuant to City policy, it is recommended the City Council reject the claim as stated and refer it to the Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund (REMIF). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Reject claim for Damages Received from Dan Sevier and refer to the Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Alternative action not advised by the City's Risk Manager. Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Yes Claimant Sue Goodrick, Risk Manager/Budget Officer Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Claim of Dan Sevier, pages 1-3. APPROVE~ _ Candace Horsley, City ~anager FAXED TO REUIF - . ..-File-With: C ity~E_.tS_Office City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Ave Ukiah, CA 95482 CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CITY OF UKIAH RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM NO. A claim must be presented, as prescribed by the Government Code of the State of California, by the claimant or a person acting on his/her behalf and shall show the following' If additional space is needed to provide your information, please attach sheets, identifying the paragraph(s) being answered. . Name of Claimant: '~ ~~t¢.,,~- , AddresS: ],--~l ['~ ~"(~.~¢-1¢~. ~_ ~ ~ OCT 2 6 ~0~ ' - fTY OF"UKIAH Address to which the person presenting the claim desires notices to be sent: Name or Addressee:~,.~ Address: /'~ / Telephone: . . The date, place and other circumstances of the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted. Date of Occurrence: '~ "- ~---'~ - O Location: .~-~r_~¢__ ~ ~ Circumstances giving rise to this claim: · Time of Occurrence: /:~. ,~ ,,'/0£ (2/4-1 ueneral description of the indebtedness, obligation, irfjury, damage or loss incurred so far as it may'be known at the time of the presentati~t~ of the claim. 5. The name or names of the public employee or employees causing the injury, damage, or loss, if known. Page 1 of 3 o If amount claimed totals less than $10,000: The amount claimed, if it totals less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) as of the date of presentation of the claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of the claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. Amount Claimed and basis for computation: If amount claimed exceeds $10,000: If the amount claimed exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000), no dollar amount shall be included in the claim. However, it shall indicate whether the claim would be a limited civil case. A limited civil case is one where the recovery sought, exclusive of attorney fees, interest and court costs does not exceed $25,000. An unlimited civil case is one in which the recovery sought is more than $25,000. (See CCP § 86.) r----~ Limited civil Case [-~ Unlimited Civil Case You are required to provide the information requested above in order to comply with Government Codel §910. I 7. Claimant(s) Social Security Number(s):· (optional) . . Claimant(s) Date(s) of Birth: Name, address and telephone number of any witnesses to the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted: 10. If the claim involves medical treatment for a claimed injury, please provide the name, address and telephone number o~f ~7,A~octors or hospitals providing treatment': ~""/'-' 11. If applicable, please attach any medical bills or reports or similar documents supporting your claim. If the claim relates to an automobile accident: Claimant(s) Auto Ins. Co.: Telephone: Address: Insurance Policy No.: Insurance Broker/Agent: Telephone: Address: Claimant's Veh. Lic. No.: Vehicle Make/Year: Claimant's Drivers Lic. No.: Expiration: If applicable, please attach any repair bills, estimates or similar documents supporting your claim. Page 2 of 3 READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims, place on the following diagram the name City of Ukiah vehicle;' location of City of Ukiah vehicle at time of of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place accident by "A-I" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to time of the accident by "B-I" and the point of impact by "X." street corners. If City of Ukiah vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City of Ukiah vehicle when you first saw it, NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a and by "B" location of yourself or your vehicle when you first saw proper diagram signed by claimant. SIDEWALK CURB ' PARKWAY SIDEWALK CURB -- Warning: Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Penal Code §72). Pursuant to California Civil Prodecures §1038, the City/Agency may seek to recover all costs of defense in the event an action is filed which is later determined not ~ve ,een brought in good faith and with reasonable cause. Signature: .~~'~/ Date:. ¢-.~//_ ~~ Page 3 of 3 ITEM NO. 6c MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REJECTION OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES RECEIVED FROM MARC TOSCA AND REFERRAL TO JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND A claim from Marc Tosca was received by the City of Ukiah on October 11, 2005 alleging emotional distress related to the response and treatment of claimant by a Ukiah Police Officer pertaining to a speeding vehicle in the Walmart parking lot on April 11, 2005. Pursuant to City policy, it is recommended the City Council reject the claim as stated and refer it to the Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund (REMIF). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Reject claim for damages received from March Tosca and refer to the Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Alternative action not advised by the City's Risk Manager. Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Claimant Sue Goodrick, Risk Manager/Budget Officer Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Claim of Marc Tosca, pages 1-13. APPROVED: Candace Horsley, City ager File With: City Clerk's Office City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Ave Ukiah, CA 95482 CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CITY OF UKIAH i ,.. 0CT ] ] 2005 L~/ CITY OF UKIAH CITY CE. FRK'S DEPARTMENT A claim must be presented, as prescribed by the Government Code of the State of California, by the claimant or a person. acting on his/her behalf and shall show the following: if additi°nai space is needed to provide your 'information, please, attach sheets, identifying the 'paragraph(s) being answered. Name and address of the Claimant: Name of Claimant: "~-(~' Address: .... ~'6-~---Pine Ridge Road, Ukiah, CA 95482 Address to which the person presenting the claim desires notices to be sent: . Name of Addressee: NARc TOSCA Telephone: Address: 46;8 Pine Rid~--"-~'(~ad'; .... ~iah, ..cA 95'4-8~~ 707 462 8235 .. The date, place and other circumstances of the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted. Date of Occurrence: 4/11/2005 Time of Occurrence: AD~pro×'. '6.30PN Location' Walmart, parking lot, Ukiah, CA 954'82''' Circumstances giving rise to this claim: See my letter dated 7/10/05 to Ukiah's Chief of Police John D. Will'~'~-~-n-'~ ..... a true and correct CoPy Of Which is att~-c-~L~-'heret0'' as o General description of the indebtedness, obligation, injury-., damagle or loss incurred so far as it may be known at the time of the presentation of the claim. · ' Emotional distress and anxiety . The name or names of the public employee or employees causing the injury, damage, or loss, if known. ukiah" p0iic'e~"-de~a'r~ment"'"officer Hoyle . Page 1 of 3 . Jf amount claimed totals less than $10,000: The amount claimed, if it totals less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) as of the Date of presentation of the claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of the claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. AmountClaimedandbasisforcomp~tg~.!og: ........ $5,000.00 for emotional ps'yc'h~[0~'["~'ai"-~au-~a"and, complete disregard for my civil'-'~~-s-0r--'m~- protected by law to be enforced in the State and City of resident and citizen tf amount claimed exceeos ~lu,o00: If the amount claimed exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000), .n° dollar amount shall be included in the claim. However, it .shall indicate whether the claim would be a limited civil case. A limited civil ca§e is one where the recovery sought, exclusive of attorney fees, interest and court costs does not exceed $25,000. An unlimited civil case is one in which the recovery sought is more than $25,000. (See CCP § 86.) I'--'] Limited Civil Case ~-] Unlimited Civil Case IYou are required to provide the information requested above in order to comply with Government Code §9 o: 7. Claimant(s) Social Security Number(s): (optional) o Claimant(s) Date(s) of Bidh: 11/26/43 . Name, address and telephone number of any witnesses to the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted: 10. If the claire'involves medical treatment for a claimed injury, please provide the name, address and telephone number of any doctors or hospitals providing treatment: 11. If applicable, please attach any medical bills or reports or similar documents supporting your claim. If the claim relates to an automobile accident: ' Claimant(s) Auto Ins. Co.: Telephone: Address: Insurance Policy No.: . Insurance Broker/Agent: .. Telephone: Address: Claimant's Veh. Lic. No.: Vehicle Make/Year: Claimant's Drivers Lic. No.: Expiration: If applicable, please attach any re'pair bills, estimates or similar documents supporting your claim. Page 2 of 3 READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims, place on the following diagram the name City of Ukiah vehicle; location of. City of Ukiah vehicle at time of of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place accident by "A-l" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to time of the accident by "B-l" and the point of impact by "X." street comers. If City of Ukiah vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City of Ukiah vehicle when you first saw !t, NOTE: if diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a and by "B" location of yourself or your vehicle when you first saw proper diagram signed by claimant. CURB ,'1' .. SIDEWALK /"'-~/ PAR,KwAY I - CURB '--'4. Warning: Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Penal Code §72). Pursuant to California Civil Prodecures §1038, the City/Agency may seek to recover all costs of defense in the event an action'is filed which is later determined not to have been brought in good faith and with reasonable cause. Signature: ~ Date: Page 3 of 3 To, ca, O ner' July 10, 2005 John D. Williamson Chief of Police of the City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested ~,70042890000456950533 Chief Williams, This OPEN letter to you is with regards to the unlawful, not to mention despicable actions of a Police Officer under your command by the name of "Hoyle". On or about April 11, 2005, I, MARC TOSCA (hereby Tosca) was walking from Staples to Walmart, in the parking lot accompanied (they being to Tosca's right) by two (2) gentlemen. The latter applying for a job at Tosca's ranch and as they were fully aware, our conversation was being recorded. While Tosca was walking in front of Walmart's Garden Shop, a truck drove by.at an extremely h±gh rate of speed, almost hitting Tosca, passing on Tosca's left side. Tosca having lost sight of his left eye at infancy, it would not have been possible for Tosca to see the driver coming On Tosca's left side. The truck being driven at that high rate of speed, it's believed the driver deliberately used his vehicle to evoke fear. Walking up to the front entrance to Walmart (the two gentlemen standing away at the newspaper racks) the driver, accompanied by a women, was encountered by Tosca, who asked: "Excuse me, do you always drive that way" , to which, in a very hostile manner, the driver replied: "Y~e., I do, when people are stupid enough to walk in the road" 12 Needless to mention there was certainly no "road", but in fact a parking lot. Nor had anything been. done to provoke the driver. Further fact remaining, it was not until the truck almost hit Tosca, that its presence was even known to Tosca. As fate would have it the entire incident was caught on tape, the sound of the truck's racing engine very clearly picked up. The driver was advised of such and that upon the arrival of the Police, he could explain his driving to them. Rather then waiting for the Police to arrive, the driver, disregarding the seriousness of the incident, rushed into Walmart. Upon Tosca entering Walmart with the two gentlemen, the call was placed to the Ukiah Police Department. The. responding Ukiah Police Officer was Officer Hoyle. officer Hoyle was advised of what occurred and again as ~ate would have it, it was all on tape. Furthermore, Officer Hoyle ~as advised that the two (2) gentlemen witnessing the incident could verify Tosca's account. Tosca has expressed to Office Hoyle his concern that the driver be held .accountable for his actions so that in future other people would not be subjected to such reckl'ess behavior and endangerment. Officer Hoyle's first response was that the Vehicle Code laws did not apply to the incident because it had occurred on "private property". This seemed odd, because the Walmart parking lot is a commercial area open 'to the public and is very busy with pedestrian and vehicle traffic. Officer Hoyle then corrected himself by saying something to the effect that what was being described to him might be regarded as "reckless driving and endangerment". Tosca reiterated to Officer Hoyle that he wanted to pursue charges on whatever the appropriate 'ground would be, and that if the incident were one of "reckless driving and endangerment", then those were the charges Tosca would and wanted to pursue. About this time the driver emerged from the Walmart store. Me was identified to Officer Hoyle, who approached the driver, and spoke with him briefly. Officer Hoyle then returned and told Tosca that the driver had said Tosca was walking in the middle of the street. TherefOre, according.to Officer Hoyle, there was nothing that he could ~do. Officer Hoyle was again told that the incident had taken place in the parking lot, within the white striped area in front of the Walmart's Garden store and most certainly not on the street as the driver claimed. ATTACHED ~ERETO EXHIBIT "A" IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE EXACT LOCATION WHERE THE DRIVER ALMOST RAN TOSCA DOWN. During the entire conversation the two (2) gentlemen who had witnessed the incident, as Officer Hoyle had been advised, were standing nearby, thus ready, willing, and able to confirm to Officer Hoyle what had happened. However, even though Officer Hoyle knew that these two men could describe what had happened, Officer Hoyle completely ignored both gentlemen and did not even bother to ask them their names and/or any question or discuss the' incident with them.. · ~ The record further reflects that these two (2) gentlemen who witnessed the incident, and who were not interviewed by Officer Hoyle, were HISPANIC, AS IS TOSCA. Officer Hoyle left the scene without investigating·Tosca's complaint, beyond talking briefly with the driver who had come close to running Tosca.down with his truck. Tosca was the victim of a vehicular assault, and there were two (2) witnesses to this incident who could readily have verified the facts, had a reasonable investigation been done. HoWever', no report was issued and nothing was done to prevent the driver from repeating his dangerous behavior and endangerment to pedestrians. Even if TosCa had been walking in the middle of the street - which in fact he was not ·doing - there still wOuld have been no lawful excuse for the driver of a motor vehicle to deliberately evoke fear in a pedestrian by driving at a high rate of speed in close proximity to the pedestrian. It remains Tosca's understanding that the Ukiah Police Department is duty-bound to investigate citizen complaints of criminal 'acts, and to issue a report based on that investigation. In this instance, the investigation was minimal, one-sided and of course biased. Two (2) witnesses, Hispanic citizens, fluent in the English language, were not even asked their names and/or interviewed.' No report was issued. It remains obvious that Officer Hoyle, who is personally known to Tosca from.previous interactions, chose to ignore Tosca's · complaint and to look the other way with respect to the criminal conduct of the driver, as Officer Hoyle has a personal bias against Tosca. ·, Under the circumstances and from past experience, the conclusion is inescapable that if Tosca reports a crime to the local police, Tosca is on his own. Certainly Tosca is not asking for special treatment, but rather simply asking that'the police leave their personal bias at home and fulfill their duty to the general public when it comes to investigating crime. Do bear in mind that Officer Hoyle had initially requested that he and Tosca both walk up in front of Hoyle's vehicle, thus enabling an audio and video taping to take place. There now remains an accOunting "verbatim" of the .interaction between Tosca and Hoyle. In future, via the appropriate forum, Subpoenas shall indeed be issued and served for said audio and video tapes. As stated above there have been other 'interactions with Hoyle: On July 25, 2000 Hoyle issued citation X33485 to Tosca - making claims of Tosca being in violation of vehicle Code section 22500 (h). The fact remains Tosca is disabled and has a California Handicapped. placard and commercial plates, wherein Vehicle Code Sections - 22502 (b) and '22505(2) exempted Tosca. Be that as it may on September 15, 2000, along with his attorney, Tosca appeared before Judge Henry Nelson regarding said X33485 - $25.00 ticket. HERETO ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" YOU SHALL FIND THE COURT DOCKET, #INTRO00009937, REFLECTIVE OF "OFFICER (HOYLE) NOT PRESENT" It was not until the 8/8/01 Deposition of a certain Ryan Duane Parr, that it all came together as to'Hoyle's motive. At about the same point in time as citation X33485, Mr. Parr filed a report, (he ' had been mugged) with Officer~ Hoyle, making mention of Tosca. Needless to mention, as with the now infamous James Allen Mallo complaint' (refer homophobia-mendocino-county, com), unequivocally, there had been no wrong doing Whatsoever by Tosca. Incidentally the record further reflects: Mendocino County Sheriffs Department - "HE (MALLO) WAS SENT TO PRISON ON 4/8/05" Mendocino Superior Court - "3/30/05 OUTSTANDING ARREST WARRANT #BW0032355, FOR RYAN DUANE PARR - CASE NO. MCWLCRNT-05-64224. Subsequent to the 8/8/01 deposition, another incident involving Hoyle occurred. At Raley's Market Tosca reported to management a vehicle which while parked in a. Handicapped Space, did not bear the Handicapped Placard. Management called the Ukiah police, asking that Tosca remain. Hoyle having responded, he was to advise Tosca that given Raley's was out of his (Hoyle's) jurisdiction, he could not issue a citation and that Tosca would have to call. the California Highway Patrol While said advice can be appreciated, what does not compute is why did the Ukiah Police respond to Raley's call in the first place? Furthermore, why did not the Ukiah police advise the Raley's caller to contact the California Highway Patrol instead, since it was out of the Ukiah Police Department' s jurisdiction? Last but not least there is the Tosca vs. Enterprise matter. Tosca had been renting an Enterprise vehicle for well over two and & half years, totaling well over $21,000.00 in payments. Enterprise former agent-and now Mendocino County Deputy Sheriff, Ms. Christine De Los Santos, had written the contract reflective of a discount being offered Tosca by Enterprise. Apparently, ~iven the life of the extended contract, Enterprise was not very happy with the discounted rate over the extended life of' the rental, thus making claim that the vehicle had been stolen by Tosca. Enterprise had Tosca arrested. It ~oes on and on. Needless to mention there, is pending litigation against Enterprise, in which Ms. De Los Santos~apparently shall appear as co-defendant. Ms. De Los Santos' ,,boyfriend" is obviously not at all happy about that fact. Cutting to the chase, once~ Ms. De Los Santos in presenting Tosca with a bright bright red pick-up truck, Tosca (~iven the reputation Officer Hoyle maintains here in Ukiah) amusingly passed commentary as to how "HOYLE" was going to love him. Ms. De Los Santos then responded: "WHY DO YOU SAY THAT. HE'S MY BOYFRIEND" ~Chief Williamson, most respectfully given what goes on here in Ukiah, it being so incestuously corrupt and all, there was a popular song in the 70's called "Harper Valley PTA", which indeed would be most appropriate. Personally, I, Tosca, refer to it all as a very bad Joan Crawford movie. In conclusion, kindly advise the procedure that is followed here in Ukiah to ensure that the matters described in this. letter - failure of Officer Hoyle to investigate Tosca's complaint and to issue a report thereon and the other Hoyle "incidents" - are duly acted upon by the Ukiah Police Department. Tosca is prepared to appear before a review 'panel or participate in whatever citizen complaint forum you may have. Tosca looks forward to your response. Tosca not subjecting his person to the outrageous behavior of the Mendocino County'Sheriffs Department, thus the Federal action against Mendocino County, speaks for itself as to the course of action Tosca shall take against the Ukiah Police Department. HERETO ATTACHED EXHIBIT "C" IS THAT CERTAIN LETTER DATED 10/23/00 ISSUED TO YOU AND SHERIFF CRAVER, EN. TO THIS DAY, REMAINS SELF EXPLANATORY. TRAFFIC DOCKET A~I'D MINUTES NOTICE SENTENCE COMMITMENT FORM ITE' r~'ZpT EIB ER iFENDANT TOSCA. DGE N~SON. HZN~ :ENDANT ADVISED 0F RIGHTS ~E WAIVED ~ Z,OO PM CITATION :z . o o 3 s,~ a 5 DEFENDANT PRESENTJ~ FILE# z Nt' RD O 00 0 9 ~) ~ ? PRO PER [:] WITH ATTY [:] NOT PRESENT [] 'BA~['-I OR'D[-I BTA [] EXON r-I FFTD[~ CITED [] POSTED BY DEFI--I, DEP [] BB[] REIN [] CITATION FACSIMILE/'-- .:..:.., ..<. ,,... CHARGES...* ' PLEA FINE OR PROOF. DUE ' DIS------~ TOSCA. MARC ULN~ .RO70645Z UOB$ 11/Z6/42 VLN~ 5B21940 VEH 'LIC EKP~ 00/00 G~[C 199 5 ~TATE ~ O?/Z5/O0 T;[KE~ ZZ~ 30 LOC: 1OO N OAK ST CA 95482 ZZ5OO ([-[) VC FJ%RK ON SIDE · ',.' '~.. TERMS___OF IT PROBATION GRANTED FOR .......... MONTHs WITH THE :)WING TERMS AND CONDITIONS IE SUSPENDED $ ..................................... DRIVER'S LICENSE SUSPENDED r'-] RESTRICTED [] ........................ DAYS/MONTHS MAY DRIVE TO AND FROM WORK DURING EMPLOYMENT TO AND FROM PROGRAM [--] [] PAY YOUR FEES OF $ .................................. ON OR BEFORE [] TRIAL BY DECLARATION. PICK UP FORMS AT CLERK'S OFFICE TODAY. ,~TURN FORM BY SE DISMISSED ............... ..,..'.i ......... /.i...-.-.,i.~--.,'i'i...i'iii. i'i_~.~_:'i.'i /_i~i'i"ii.'i .......... .-ii'" :' "'i'i' ;::" ......... UR NEXT COURT DATE IS ................................ ::-': ...... ': ........... ....................................... AT ~ YOUR COURT TRIAL DATE IS,. ..... [] COURT LOCATION ........................ ' ......................................................................... AT ......... [] WARRANT TO ISSUE FOR $ ........................................................ ["--] CASH ONLY [--] WARRANT RECALLED [] FTP/FTA RELEASE · , [] OFFICER NOTIFIED. PROBAT~NTENCE ., ,. .... [] ATTEND r'-] ALCOHOL AWARENESS PROGRAM [] TRAFFIC SCHOOL YOU MUST REGISTER IMMEDIATELY AND COMPLETE WITHIN 60 DAYS COURT COST FEEs DUE IMMEDIATELY [~ $ ................... CIVIL ASSESSMENT [] PAY A FINE OF $ ............................................................. TO THE CLERK'S OFFtCE/R&R $ ..................... PER MONTH BEGINNING UNTIL PAID + $30.00 ADMIN. FEE. RESET TO $ .............. WITH PROOF OF CORRECTION [~ JAIL ................... HOURS/DAYS IN LIEU OF $ ............. IN FINES TURN IN TO COUNTY JAIL JUDGE ....... DATE ..... DANT'S SIGNATURE .... .~ ADDRESS Co'pY'0F*TFiESE-'COND. i.T:i~N~.01~ SE'NTi~NC AND NDERST RECEIVED A f U AND AND AGREE TO COMPLY. VIOLATION rlONS OF THIR E 23, 200O ~ol'Polico nt' CITY OF UKT. AI! 300 Semi.fy Aveme .Ulcin~ C^ 9.S4t1:2 crav Sl~;fl'ofMondoeino County 951 I~w O~p ~d l~ah, CA 95482 Re:. )Id), Client: MARC Dear This letter is to ~orve n~ formal nolk~ that pursuant to the harassment of my eJlent. Mar~ Tosea. by empioytx~ of'both Uk]ah Pollce Dapattment and Memdo~no ex,sm,? sh fr, oepartn, en,. nve · · w~h-Idn, AT ALL 1'r''r''' .... . .~ my ehent _to o~rry a }mad I'.dd tape reoordor _ '."."'" "'~e'" ,m;m ur menaocmo UOunl Oe, D~qflm~'., u,.. .... c._~ .~ ..... -'."" ~ ~ m,~ umpz~ Via -r .......--......~u,.-um toaz Mr, 'i'ose~ · · . . cam. a recorder with b~m at all uae4 ' shotdd NCYr be mtr, tak,,,, ~,, ........, ..... - . and st an ofla-~r conm into contaol wJ~h Mr. Tosca, pon gun on h~s IMrS~ should We rcsret Iha/tlds letter has become necessary and that Mr. Tosca cannot Jive peaoeCully ~n h~s community wilbur mduri,8 uadue baras.mem by the porjee agende~ in the atoa. We r~peet~lly requesl that any and MI harassment of my olient, Man: . Tow, a, by agem~ and omployee~ oreach o/'yom Departmen~ ocmse and de~i~t forthwith. f'lC~ ,t two We an: cndosin8 ~ copy of Lbo cmnPl~n~ filed by tide office an Mr. Tosca'$ bch~if'iu tl~ U. S. l)i.qtrlct Court, ~Norl~/)tst~0t of'Cslif'OrT~ a~ir~ the C,(Xlnty of' Mendocino [ShorJfr's l')0partmeat]. It would be unfortunate if'such e comp.l~t wo~ld also b~ noce~ an~in~ tho City or' tndah/'or onoott~ undue hnrassmem by its po~ officer~ ' tryou here efly questioes or com~ we would roq~eot that thc~y bo put in writifl~ and sent ro tny'fsw ofliee at the obOvo addrus. Tlmnk you for your 8ntJc.,i~toA c~urtc~.~: told coope-ntlon evil fmt'ormln~ your officers and each of'll~ timt lvYr. Tosea hes been in~ecl by Idg cmm~l Io carry n ~mpe recon~ [ummlly in bin ddrt pook~] at all titr~ t! i John D. WilliamSon, Chief' of Ukiah - City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue - IJkiah, CA 95482 October 14, 200 OCT ITY OF UK~A~ . Chief Williamson, Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested #7004289000045 6952605 While indeed it would be logical for one to assume that there would be safety in the lobby of a police station, your dispatcher "S.alisbury" prove same to be premature. The audio tape of the conversation that took place at approximately 11-30 today shall prove most concerning to the citizenry of Ukiah. t '..'.' . At the moment the only information available concerning the two threatening individuals are: i - both hispanic 2 - their vehicle a white Honda 3 - license plate 5MUJ~69 Photographs having been taken, the film shall be developed, the shots presented with the formal complaint. closed, In the interim and given the ptolice office was kindly have a staff member call me at tel~4~~ cc: Mayor Markus J~shiku AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. 6,~ DATE: November 16, 2005 REPORT SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF A VENDOR NAME CHANGE ON A PREVIOUSLY REPORTED PURCHASE AWARDED TO INNOPRISE SOFTWARE, INC. SUMMARY: At the March 16, 2005 meeting of the City Council, a report was given identifying the acquisition of the MV-RS utility meter reading software, the direct interface to the City's current utility billing software, and the required installation/set-up services. Purchase Order #035972 was issued to Innoprise Software Inc. for the direct interface portion of the work to be completed. Before work began, Innoprise Software Inc. transferred ownership of the utility billing software to Harris Computer Systems. The City's Purchasing Agent has consequently changed the vendor name on the existing Purchase Order #035972 from Innoprise Software, Inc. to Harris Computer Systems. This report is to serve as notification of this change. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the notification of vendor name change as reported. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: N/A Mary Horger, Purchasing Agent Paulette Klingbeil, Information Technology Supervisor Candace Horsley, City Manager N/A Candace Horsley, City ~anager AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT ITEM NO. 6e DATE: Nov. 16, 2005 SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF BID TO ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $5016.00 PLUS TAX AND SHIPPING FOR THE PURCHASE OF 24 LENGTHS OF FIRE HOSE Submitted for the City Council's notification is the bid award to All Star Fire Equipment in the amount of $5016.00 plus tax and shipping, for the purchase of 24 lengths of fire hose. This purchase is part of the departments continuing program to replace and upgrade fire hose that is no longer serviceable. The Fire Hose will be funded from the approved budget under 100.2101.800.002. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive notification of bid award to All Star Fire Equipment in the amount of $5016.00 plus tax and shipping. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: N/A Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: N/A Kurt Latipow Fire Chief Candace Horsley, City Manager ~;andace Horsley, City ~,nager AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. 6f DATE:November 16, 2005 REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NOTICE OF REHABILITATION AND TRAFFIC SPECIFICATION NO. 05-07 COMPLETION FOR PAVEMENT SIGNAL LOOP REPLACEMENT, SUMMARY: Funding for this project was approved in the fiscal year 2005/2006 budget in the amount of $204,000 in account number 341.9655.250.000. The City Council awarded the contract on August 17, 2005 to Granite Construction Company (contractor) of Ukiah, California in the amount of $198,568. The work of the contract was completed by the contractor in substantial conformance with the approved plans and specifications on October 11,2005. The final contract cost based on actual quantities constructed is $196,265.86. Final payment of the 10 percent retention will be made to the contractor after 35 days from the date the Notice of Completion is filed with the County Recorder. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Accept the work as complete; 2. Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder for Pavement Rehabilitation and Traffic Signal Loop Replacement, Specification No. 05-07. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: None. Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: N/A Diana Steele, Director of Public Works / City Enginee~'J~x~ Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works ~,..~ Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Notice of Completion A PPROVED~~ Candace Horsley, Cit~Manager AG-NOC-Spec-05-07.SUM Please return to: CITY OF UKIAH 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482-5400 (707) 463-6200 Attachment NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: . That the real property described is owned by the following whose address is: City of Ukiah, a Municipal Corporation, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California 95482-5400 . That the nature of the title to the Pavement Rehabilitation and Traffic Signal Loop Replacement, Specification No. 05-07 of all said owners is that of fee simple. . That on the 11th day of October 2005, the Contract work for this project was actually completed. o That the name and address of the Contractor is Granite Construction Company, 1324 South State Street, Ukiah, California, 95482-6414. . That the real property herein referred to is situated in the County of Mendocino, State of California, and is described as follows: City-owned property identified as Empire Drive, Norton Street, Mill Street, and South State Street within the City of Ukiah. City Council Approval CITY OF UKIAH, a Municipal Corporation By: DATE Marie Ulvila, City Clerk DATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF MENDOCINO) I, Marie Ulvila, being duly sworn says: That she is the City Clerk of the City of Ukiah City Council, that she has read the foregoing Notice of Completion and knows the content thereof and the same is true of her own knowledge. Marie Ulvila, City Clerk Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me, Deborah Pollock, Notary Public, on this day of ,2005, by , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Notary Public in and for the County of Mendocino, State of California AGENDA ITEM NO: 6§ MEETING DATE: November t6, 2005 SUMMARY REPORT SUB3ECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING SECTION 3707.1 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE REQUIRING SEWER SERVICES TO BE CHARGED TO CUSTOMERS RECEIVING WATER SERVICES At the November 2, 2005 meeting, the City Council held a public hearing and introduced the Ordinance amending Section 3707.1 of the Ukiah City code requiring sewer services to be charged to customers receiving water services. This Ordinance was intro, duced to clarify/specify who is required to apply and assume financial responsibility for the monthly charges for sewer service. It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Ordinance which would become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adoption of Ordinance amending section 3707.1 of the Ukiah City Code requiring sewer services to be charged to customers receiving water services. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Flake revisions to the current Ordinance. Citizens Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Candace Horsley, City Manager Dave Rapport, City Attorney #1 - Ordinance Amending Section 3707.1 of Ukiah City Code Approved: Candace Horsley, City Manager ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING SECTION 3707.1 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows: SECTION ONE Section 3707.1 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: §3707.1: RATES: The rates set forth hereafter shall be the rates for all premises connected to public sewers within or under the jurisdiction and control of the City. These rates shall be subject to modification and change which may be made by resolution of the Council. These rates, although stated on a monthly basis, may be billed monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly as determined from time to time by the Council. Charges for sewer services to any premises connected with the City Water and/or Electric Systems shall be collected together with, and not separately from, the charges for services to said premises, and shall be billed upon one bill and collected as one item. The Customer who applied for and assumed the obligation to pay for water service to the property is the person liable for sewer charqes to the property served by that water service. In the case of multiple units served by a master water meter, one person or entity, such as the property owner, shall pay for and assume liability for sewer service to that property. This requirement shall not prevent tenants in a multi-unit residential property from exercising their rights under Public Utilities Code Section 10009.1, including their option to become utility customers in accordance with the requirements of that section, to whom the service will then be billed, without being required to pay the amount due on the delinquent account. Each premises or user connected to the public sewage system shall be classified under one of the following user categories and shall be subject to the rates specified for such category. Premises or users which are susceptible to classification under two (2) or more of such user categories shall be specially classified by City and shall be subject to rates established by City which shall allow for a reasonable usage allocation. [Underlined text added.] ORDINANCE NO. 1 SECTION TWO 1. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ukiah, and shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Introduced by title only on November 2, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Crane, McCowen, Rodin, Baldwin, and Mayor Ashiku None None None Adopted on ,2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mark Ashiku, Mayor ATTEST: Marie Ulvila, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2 ITEM NO. 6t~ DATE:November 16, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING RECORDS DESTRUCTION The Public Utilities Department has reviewed Records Destruction Notices encompassing 25 boxes and identified 24 boxes as ready for destruction. There are several files in boxes that the Director of Public Utilities has identified to retain. Staff will create a new archival box for those files. The City's Records Retention Schedule was adopted by City Council in 1999. The City Attorney has reviewed the Records Destruction Notices for each archival box and has approved those boxes designated for destruction. Funds have been allocated in the City Clerkls budget for shredding of documents. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Destruction of Certain Records ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: N/A Marie Ulvila, City Clerk -~'~Z~ ~ City Manager Horsley, City Attorney Rapport, and Public Utilities Director Ziemianek 1. Resolution with attached Records Destruction list Candace Horsley, City Man~,,er ASR: Records Destruction 2005 Public Utilities ATTACHMENTJ~- RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS WHEREAS, the Public Utilities Department has reviewed and approved the list of records that are ready for destruction; and WHEREAS, the attached list of City records represents records which are no longer necessary and may at this time be destroyed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ukiah City Council hereby approves the destruction of certain records, contained in Exhibit A of this Resolution, and authorizes the City Clerk to destroy the records. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Mark Ashiku, Mayor Marie Ulvila, City Clerk Resolution 2006- Page 1 of 1 Records Coordinator: Marie Ulvila, City Clerk June 6, 2005 IDepartment~~~l~~ Current retention schedules show that the records listed are now ready for destruction. Instructions: 1. Review this listing. 2. Obtain Department Head's Signature. 3. Return this notice, signed, no later than July 6, 2005 to City Clerk. Thank you for your coOperation in keeping our records management system working smoothly and legally. Marie Ulvila, City Clerk LOCATION BOX RECORD TITLE DATES RETENTION COMMENTS DATES 261 2136 Misc. Correspondence 9/91-8/00 2005 263 2138 ,, " " 264 2139 " " " - ~- ,~-,'~- ~-~ 267 2141 " " " 268 2140 " " " 269 2142 " " " 275 2.146 " " " ~'~'~.~'~ 281 2t47 " " " 283 2.148 ,, 285 2150 ,, ,, ,, 290 2155 ,6 ,, 293 2151 298 2152 " " " 301 2154. " " " 311 2157 " " " 316 -2160 " " " ,'~'~'~'~ ~-- /' II 318 2.159 " " 327 2163 ,, 6, ,, 331 2164 " " 333 2165 " " " 335 2166 " " " 338 .2167 ,, ' .... / ~339 .2168 " ' .... 340 .2169 341 -2170 Signatures Authorizing DeStruction City Clerk Destroyed By Reports: Destroy-Public Utilities 2005 X 0 -=- 8 C § O o o 0 0 0 o .o_ o o 0 o ~o 0 · o ~D o o 0 c o .o O 0 E E E E E E E E E'E E E E E E E~' E E E E E EEE E EE E 00~ ~000000000000 OO~ ~ ~ 0 .... ~ ~ C ~ C C C C C C C ~ C ~~ ~ooooooooooo~ oo~ cOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ C 0 C 0 0 ~ w~.~ mm 0000(900000.0 zzzzzzzz, zz, z .~ .~ .6_ ._6.6_ ._6 .d, o ~, o 6 LIJ UJ IJJ LL! LIJ LIJ IJJ LLI UJ LLI W Uj C 0 0 X 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 I~. ~L C 0 0 ~ E o 0 o o E (/) o o c o 00 0 0 0 0 LI_ 0 0 .~,.. 0 o ~. rr .~ ~E ~ ~ -.,= E '"" o ~_ ~ I [ ~~ o m ' E '~E~-~ o,- o ._ 0~0~.~ 0 o0_< ,-c~ 66666666666666666666 , , W IJJ W W W W W IJJ W LIJ W W W W W W W W W W W Uj c r X m .o_ .4=== .o_ .c -~ · 0 . o o ~ ~o 0 (D A '0 ._o 0 LL 0 0 0 o 0 0 .co A ~- ~. 8 E g 0 0 · , o o o .0 o (1) (1) ~ oo 0 0 A 0 8 ~~wwwwwwwwwww C 0 0 (D o. 0 0 O. o .. 0 0 D r~ 0 0 0 X 0 C X 0 C - C 0 -0 .~_ · C 0 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0 .-- .% 0 0 0 ' ": '::.':: ':.~.:~!' x ":;~.!?.- -' '"'; :' .' 2 0'..:~!~.: '"' '.W'."': 133 ..'~!~-.... ' 0 ' '... . ~ -. 0 0 0 .. , .'. ~ · .. 0 . ".' ' ~ . · · .~." 0 ~ ...~ .....~ :: ..'~ ...~ .-~ .~ - ...... ~ .~ .. ~ · · :'.:9 0 C 0 ~ . 0 O. ._~ ._6 0 o-~ o '~._m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~_ 0 n". · · ~ g 0 0 0 0 A 0 A "1 X 0 0 0 0 _ 0 X 0 0 .~_ m ._ t-- 0 · . X 0 (.3 CO(Z) ~-'E 8~. ._ ~"~o O0 000066000066606 ~~W~WW~W~W~WWWWWWW 0 o0 c 0 0 0 0 0 (D IJJ L~I W W cr~ IJJ IJJ W W ~J uj LU W C 0 0 C 0 0 .W 0 0 0 ~D 0 0 LI_ c ./ ITEM NO, 6. ± DATE: November 16~ 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUB3ECT: INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO SIGN CONTRACTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Government Code Section 40602 states that the mayor shall sign (a) all warrants drawn on the city treasurer; (b) all written contracts and conveyances made or entered into by the city; and (c) all instruments requiring the city seal. The statute goes on to provide that the City Council may by ordinance authorize any other city official to sign such documents. Case law has held that a contract signed by a city official other than the mayor is unenforceable against a city, unless the city council has adopted an ordinance authorizing that official to sign on behalf of the city. (See South Bay Sen/or/-/ous/ng Corp. v C/b/of/-/awthome(1997, 2nd Dist) 56 Cai App 4th 1231.) The attached ordinance is being proposed to give the City Manager the authority to sign contracts and other documents, if the mayor is unavailable to sign or the City Council in a motion or resolution specifically authorizes the City Manager to sign a particular document. In addition, the City Manager or his or her designee would be authorized to sign contracts that do not require prior City Council approval, such as contracts for goods or services costing less than $10,000. This has been the City's past practice, but the City has not adopted an ordinance as required by Government Code Section 40602. The attached ordinance will provide the necessary legal authority for this long-standing past practice. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to introduce ordinance by title only and motion to introduce ordinance. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Decline to introduce ordinance or request modifications to ordinance. Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: David .1. Rapport, City Attorney David .1. Rapport, City Attorney Candace Horsley, City Manager Proposed ordinance APPROVED:, Candace Horsley,qC~ Manager ATTACHMEN? , I~ ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ADDING SECTION 119.5 TO DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 1 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows. SECTION ONE. Section 119.5 is hereby added to the Ukiah City Code to read as follows: {}119.5: AUTHORITY TO SIGN DOCUMENTS: The City Manager is hereby authorized to shall sign any of the following documents, either when the Mayor is not available to sign or when authorized by motion or resolution of the City Council: (a) All warrants drawn on the City treasurer. (b) All written contracts and conveyances made or entered into by the City. (c) All instruments requiring the City seal. The City Manager or his or her designee is also authorized to sign contracts that do not require prior City Council approval. SECTION TWO 1. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ukiah, and shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. It shall apply to documents signed by the City Manager before or after the effective date of the ordinance. Introduced by title only on ,2005, by the following roll call vote: ORDINANCE NO. 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Adopted on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ,2005 by the following roll call vote: Mark Ashiku, Mayor ATTEST: Marie Ulvila, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. 6.i DATE: November 16, 2005 REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ADJUSTING JUNIOR FEES FOR THE UKIAH MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE. In June of 2005, the City Council adopted a new fee schedule for the Ukiah Municipal Golf Course in an effort to reverse a decreasing fund balance and maintain the course as a self- sufficient enterprise fund. Another goal of the new fee schedule was to eliminate the large and confusing array of rates and offer a simple array of the lowest rates possible. The $12 per round junior weekday rate is the lowest of any of the rates offered at the course. However, under the old rate schedule juniors also received a special rate on weekends after 1:00 p.m. (twilight). The new rate structure does not provide a weekend/holiday rate for juniors and has inadvertently subjected juniors to higher weekend fees. The Park, Recreation, and Golf Commission and City Staff are recommending extending the $12 weekday junior rate to weekends/holidays after 1:00 p.m. This recommendation reflects a similar discount extended to juniors under the old rate structure and should result in increase junior play during non-peak hours of operation. The change is displayed in bold type on the attached draft resolution. Since the new fee schedule has only been in place for a few months, there is not yet enough data to fully analyze the impacts of the adjusted fee schedule. The Parks, Recreation, and Golf Commission and City Staff are closely monitoring the effects of the new fee schedule and will provide recommendations for other adjustments in the future, if necessary. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolution adjusting junior fees for the Ukiah Municipal Golf Course. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Determine adoption of Resolution requires further consideration and provide staff with direction. 2. Determine adoption of Resolution is inappropriate at this time and do not move to approve. Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: N/A Parks, Recreation, and Golf Commission Sage Sangiacomo, Community/General Services Director Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Draft Resolution APPROVEEk~~_~~,% Candace Horsley, City Manager DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ADJUSTING JUNIOR FEES FOR THE UKIAH MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah operates and maintains the Municipal Golf Course for the use. of the Ukiah community and general regional area; and WHEREAS, the City Council may from time to time consider fee adjustments in order to continue operation of the Golf Course in a fiscally responsible manner; and WHEREAS, said fee adjustments have been made available for public review. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following rates are hereby established for the Ukiah Municipal Golf Course: Fee Cate_qorv Daily Fees Weekday Monday -Thursday Daily Fees Weekend Friday- Sunday, and Holidays A.. 18 Holes $20.00 $25.00 Senior $16.00 N/A Junior $12.00 $12.00 (After 1:00 p.m.) B. Twilight $16.00 $18.00 (1:00 p.m.) C. Annual Greens Fees* Unlimited Adult Unlimited Adult Couples Unlimited Junior' 'Limited. Adult** Limited Couple Limited Senior Limited Senior Couple Limited Junior $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $ 500.00 $1,2oo.oo $1,600.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $ 3oo.oo D. Annual Private Cart Permit Fee $ 215.00 *Annual Fees are effective July 1 through June 30 of each year and due and payable prior to July 1. Annuals are non-transferable and non-refundable. **Limited Annuals valid after 1:00 p.m. on weekends. E. Definitions Unlimited Annual: Limited Annual: Couples: Valid seven days per week Valid Monday thrOugh Thursday and after 1:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays Couples is defined as a domestic partnership .in accordance with the California Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003, and Section 297 of the Family Code which states that a domestic partnership is established in California. when both persons Senior: Junior: meet the 'criteria for and file a Declaration of Domestic Partnership with the California Secretary of State. Senior is 60 years and older. Junior is 17 and under. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1._~6th day of November, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Mark Ashiku, Mayor Marie Uivila, City Clerk ITEM NO.: 8. a DATE: November '16, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: CONTINUANCE OF MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP-SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENT EXCEPTION-VARIANCE NO. 05-19 SUMMARY: On October 19th, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the Meaux Minor Subdivision Map-Subdivision Requirement Exception project, and received considerable public testimony from the applicants and members of the public. The Council then continued the project after being informed that that the Planning Commission's decision to approve an associated Variance application had been appealed to the Council. The Council desired to consider and take action on all components of the project at the same meeting. At the request of Staff, the matter was again continued on November 2, 2005. On November 8, 2005, Staff met again with the City Attorney to review all the submitted information, applicable code provisions, opposition statements, and the alternative project design submitted by Mr. Shawn Harmon at the October 19th public hearing. At the conclusion of the meeting, consensus was reached that the alternative project design that did not require a variance or exception, appeared feasible. Accordingly, from a legal perspective, making the findings of fact to support and recommend approval of the variance and exception are now problematic. Staff met with Mr. Meaux on November 9, 2005 to discuss this conclusion. As a result of the discussion, Mr. Meaux is requesting that the matter be continued to the December 7, 2005 meeting. This will allow him to review his options and alternatives with Staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Continue the items to the December 7, 2005 City Council meeting. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: N/A Citizen Advised: Mr. Shawn Harmon Requested by: Mr. Ron Meaux Prepared by: Charley Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development and Dave Lohse, Associate Planner Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager and Diana Steele, Director of Public Works. Attachments: None APPROVED: Candace Horley, City Manager ~,, ]-I'EM NO. 9. a DATE: November 16, 2005 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUB.1ECT: REV]:EW AND DTREC'rLON CONCERNTNG STAFF LETTER TO MENDOCI'NO COUNTY COMMENTZNG ON THE HOP KTLN / RYDER HOMES PRO3ECT SUMMARY: On November 2, 2005, the City Council conducted a public discussion of the Hop Kiln / Ryder Homes development project proposed outside the City limits just east of the old Masonite Plant. The Council heard from Staff, the project proponents, and the general public, and then discussed the land use and environmental issues associated with the project. At the conclusion of the discussion, the Council directed Staff to prepare a comment letter. The Council also decided to form a subcommittee (Rodin and McCowen) to prepare a separate letter reflecting issues and concerns raised by the City Council. The Council directed further that the letters be reviewed at the regularly scheduled meeting on November 16, 2005 before formal submittal to Mendocino County. The Staff letter is attached for review and consideration. RECOMMENDA'I~ON: Review and discuss the draft letter commenting on the Hop Kiln / Ryder Homes project, and provide direction to Staff. ALTERNATI'VE COUNCTL POLTCY OPTZON: Do not review the letter and provide direction to Staff. Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: City Council Prepared by: Charley Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Draft letter commenting on the Hop Kiln / Ryder Homes project APPROVED: Candace Horsley, City Manger November 17, 2005 Frank Lynch, Chief Planner Mendocino County Planning and Building Services 501 Low Gap Road Ukiah, CA 95482 RE: City of Ukiah Comments Concerning the Hop Kiln Ranch Homes Project Dear Frank: The City of Ukiah thanks Mendocino County for transmitting the Hop Kiln Ranch Homes project for our review and comment. On November 2, 2005, the City Council discussed the project and provided an opportunity for the public to participate in the discussion. The following text reflects comments made by the Council, Staff, and the public. It is organized into two components: 1) Application Completeness; and 2) Primary Environmental Issues. Application Completeness We assume the application has been deemed "Complete" because you are embarking on the environmental review process. However, at the City Council meeting, one of the project proponents indicated that the application was not yet "Complete," while another representative indicated that it was "Complete." Both project proponents indicated that they wanted the City's comments on the concept and design of the project inferring that they would modify the project accordingly. While the City has no comments on the "Completeness" of the application, we are concerned that the project description appears to be a "moving target." Regardless, we assume that the project proceeding to the environmental review stage of processing is as described in the October 13, 2005 transmittal. If the project has been modified, please advise us of the changes and the "Completeness" status of the application. Primary Environmental Issues The City Council and participating public expressed concern about the size of the proposal, and the potential significant impacts it could have on the City. While the project is being described by the developers as an "Urban Village Smart Growth Development" it has the potential to significantly alter the character of the valley and impact the City in many ways. Certainly the mix of housing types, parks and open spaces, varied architectural designs, and other components that make up the project are much more desirable than traditional stark subdivision developments, but it's a very large project that could potentially have a population nearly half the size of the City of Willits. This increase in the Valley's population could in turn significantly increase the City's already congested "daytime" population. The resulting traffic, aesthetic, water/hydrology, economic, and all other potential impacts should be thoughtfully and carefully analyzed. There should be an extensive and detailed analysis of all the potential environmental impacts resulting from the proposed project, including an identification of the direct and cumulative impacts the project could have on the City. The City acknowledges that projects occurring within the City contribute to the cumulative environmental impacts affecting the area. Accordingly, we have provided the attached list of City projects to the ETR consultants for use in the discussion of cumulative impacts. Traffic and Circulation: When the Ukiah General Plan was developed in the early 1990% and adopted in 1995, the Masonite Plant was still in operation. The property was outside the City limits, but within the Sphere of ]:nfluence, so the Plan assigned the property an "]? (]:ndustrial) designation. The Plan identified the extension of Orchard Avenue along and adjacent to the Masonite Plant north to Hensley Creek road as a high priority to relieve traffic congestion on North State Street, Today the plant is gone and a large regional shopping mall is being planned for the Masonite property. The 734 residential unit / 50,000 square foot of commercial Hop Kiln/Ryder Homes project adjacent to the east is being proposed on ]:ndustrially designated land. ]:t is understood that the Lovers Lane property recently changed ownership, and a large residential development is foreseeable. The central traffic/circulation related question today, 10-years after adoption of the Ukiah General Plan, and after the major changes to the assumed land uses on and around the Masonite Property, is "Does the extension of Orchard Avenue beyond the Brush Street triangle still make sense for the City?" We already know that build-out of the Triangle will cause one turning movement at Perkins and Orchard to operate at an unmitigatable Level of Service (LOS) "F." How will the regional shopping mall, Hop Kiln/Ryder Homes project, and Lovers Lane development impact this intersection? Will the "benefit" of improved traffic congestion on North State Street out-weigh the impacts to the Orchard Avenue/Perkins Street :Intersection? The Environmental ]:mpact Report should thoroughly analyze the direct and cumulative traffic impacts these projects and other foreseeable projects would have on all applicable City streets and intersections, and the developments must be fully responsible for returning all significantly degraded street and intersection Levels of Service to the levels existing prior to these developments. :In the broad picture, the City acknowledges that infill development projects within the City may add to traffic congestion along streets and intersections in the unincorporated area. Accordingly, the City is prepared to work closely with the County in developing mitigation priorities and comprehensive funding mechanisms for area-wide traffic and circulation improvements. Aesthetics: The potential direct and cumulative aesthetics impacts resulting from the project could be significant. The change from open land to a dense urban environment, particularly on the east side of Highway 101, has the potential to change the aesthetics and character of the Ukiah Valley. Both the Ukiah General Plan and proposed UVAP recognize the importance of the open scenic vistas and agrarian appearance of the Valley. The Ukiah General Plan calls for its preservation, and the UVAP calls for its conservation. The E:IR should thoroughly analyze this potential significant adverse impact, and suggest direct site planning and design related mitigation measures. In the broad picture, the City believes that the recent City/County partnership regarding design issues associated with development in the Brush Street Triangle should evolve to include all areas proposed for urban type development. City Staff is available to work with County Staff on site planning and design issues. Water and Hydrology: The applicants for the project have indicated that they intend to annex into the Millview Water District, and that the property has approximately 250+ acres of water rights to water from Russian River. They propose to transfer these water rights to the District with an additional well (Well #6), which Millview has stated will allow the removal of the current water moratorium. The City questions whether or not the water is physically there to serve the project. Moreover, if it is physically there, the City is concerned that use of this historically unused water could have a significant adverse impact on the City's water sources, particularly the Ranney Collector. The EIR should thoroughly analyze this potentially significant adverse impact. Physical Change and Economic Impact: The proposed commercial development in the project, designed as a traditional mixed-use "downtown" could have a potentially significant adverse impact on the economic health of Ukiah's historic downtown. This creation of an alternative local downtown is a significant physical change caused by the project that could lead to significant economic impacts, and adversely impact the City's current attempts to revitalize its downtown. Therefore, this potentially significant impact should be thoroughly analyzed in the E]:R. Thank you for seeking the City's initial comments on this project. We look forward to participating in the comprehensive environmental review process and formally commenting on the merits of the project. Sincerely, Charley Stump, Director Planning and Community Development Encl. City of Ukiah Projects Recently Approved, Under Review, or Under Construction PROJECT NAME TYPE LOCATION STATUS Menton/RochalRuff 32 apartment units Apple Avenue Approved by PC O'Bergin 44 apartment units S. State Street Approved by PC Mason 10,000 sq. ft Retail/ Airport Park Blvd % occupied 10,500 sq. ft. Office and 10,000 sq, ft. restaurant complex Thomas 1,000 sq. ft. coffee East Perkins St. % occupied shop with drive- through / 5,800 retail/3,200 sq. ft. office complex Raitt/Holmes 5 apartment units Waugh Lane Approved by PC Roberts Coffee shop South Orchard Approved by PC 1,000 sq. ft. Ave Chevron Fueling Station Gas Station remodel Perkins St. and Approved by PC and addition (4 new Orchard Avenue pumps - 12 total)/12- seat restaurant / 3,000 sq. ft. mini-market/ car wash RufflMountanos 30 apartment units Old Talmage Rd. Approved by PC Lazaro 11 apartment units Ford Street Approved by PC Watson/Best 61 room Hotel/2 Airport Park Blvd Approved by PC Commercial bldg's: 7,000 sq. ft. (assume restaurant) and 4,000 sq. ft. (assume general retail) RCHDC 30 apartment units Orchard Avenue Under Review Rufflldarius 8 apartment units Ford Street Under Review UVMC Hospital 30,000 sq. ft. Medical Hospital Drive Approved by PC offices Marin Ventures 15,000 sq. ft. E Perkins and Approved by PC/CC Walgreens Hospital Drive Tractor Supply Co 15,000 sq. ft. retail Airport Park Blvd Under Construction Kreeger 4,000 sq. ft. Medical Washington Approved by PC office Avenue Meaux/Baltins 12,000 sq. ft. Medical South Dora Street Approved by PC offices Plowshares Peace and 4,000 sq. ft. Dining South State Street Approved by PC Justice Center Hall / Admin offices Phillips 4 apartment units Mason Street Approved by PC Shimizo 12 homes Low Gap Road Approved by PC Ruff/Idarius 11 homes Luce Street Under Review Nov 2005 AGENDA ITEM NO: ~--~.,~ MEETING DATE: November 16, 2005 SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION REGARDING HYDROLOGY STUDY OF HOPKILN HOUSING PROJECT WATER USE At the November 2, 2005 City Council meeting, during the presentation and discussion on the Hopkiln (Ryder Homes) project, the developer discussed the current plan for use of onsite wells for water service to 500 - 750 homes. The developer is in negotiations for Millview Water District to purchase the wells and treat the water to serve the development. Concern was expressed by the Council as to the effect the drawdown of this large amount of water, which is currently not being used, would have on the City's Ranney collector's ability to pump water and serve the City's customers. Vice Mayor Baldwin requested that our hydrologist consultants, Wagner and Bonsignore, propose a work plan for studying the possible effects of the Hopkiln Project use of this water. Bob Wagner has responded to our request for a work plan to address possible impacts from the potential increases and withdraws from the Masonite wells on the City's water supply. Since Millview will most likely be required to study the impacts of this purchase, he suggests that the City conduct a "reconnaissance level" hydrologic investigation intended to identify the potential impacts to the City's water supply and water rights. The investigation would entail compiling reports and documents including well logs and hydro-geology information related to Masonite, Millview and others. Also information about the existing water rights of Masonite and water right issues that Millview will be faced with, assuming it moves forward with serving the planned development, would be identified and analyzed. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize staff to proceed with Wagner and Bonsignore to develop an agreement for the Hopkiln water use hydrologic investigation. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Wait until Millview discusses the item in open session. Citizens Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Vice Mayor Baldwin Candace Horsley, City Manager Bob Wagner of Wagner and Bonsignore Candace Horsley, City'~/lanager A brief report would then be prepared summarizing this information and setting forth a course of action for the City to pursue to protect its interests in the water resources of the area. This would also include identifying issues that Millview or others might need to address in its EIR for expansion of service to other areas or developments. Mr. Wagner estimates the budget for this effort at $15,000 or less. Also, as the City moves forward with its own water source development projects, some of this work could overlap and be useful for that effort as well. City staff will keep track of the Millview agendas for an open session discussion of this issue to dialogue directly with the Millview Board on our concerns. If we find out that Millview is not planning on studying the impacts of this project, we would return to the Council to possibly revise the workplan for Wagner and Bonsignore. AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. lO. a DATE: November 16, 2005 REPORT SUB3ECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING MARRIAGE EQUALITY SUMMARY: During the last legislative session, a bill sponsored by Assembly members Mark Leno and Patty Berg that would have legalized same sex marriage was passed by the legislature but vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger. During discussion of the bill the point was made that Registered Domestic Partnerships do not provide the same rights and responsibilities as marriage, particularly with regard to child custody, estate planning, death and retirement benefits and other financial, issues. Council members John McCowen and Marl Rodin have requested that a resolution supporting marriage equality be presented for discussion. A similar resolution was recently discussed by the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors and adopted. Their staff were quoted as saying that "marriage as a vital social institution, is a foundation of a healthy society. That foundation is weakened without full participation by committed partners of any sexual orientation. Civil marriage enhances the welfare of the community, granting many protections and benefits, while, at the same time, requiring many legal, financial and social obligations in return. Any statute or law that grants privileges to a group of citizens, while abridging or denying them to another group, creates second class citizens". This resolution, if adopted, would simply serve as an expression of the City Council's opinion. It will not enact any law, impose any obligation on the part of the City or foreclose any future action that the City would otherwise be able to take. RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of Marriage Equality Resolution and communicate same to the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors and legislative representatives. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: Do not adopt Marriage Equality Resolution or adopt resolution with changes. Citizen Advised: Requested by: Council Members McCowen and Rodin Prepared by: Candace Horsley, City Manager Coordinated with: Attachments: 1. Draft Marriage Equality Resolution APPROVED: Candace Horsley, City Manager ATTACHMENT # 1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ~ SUPPORTING MARRIAGE EQUALITY WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Ukiah ("City") has by local policy shown its commitment to fair and equitable treatment of all persons regardless of race, creed, religion, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation; and, WHEREAS, both the United States Constitution and California Constitution state that each person within their jurisdictions shall be guaranteed equal protection under their laws; and WHEREAS, marriage is a unique civil contract, separate and distinct from any religious, cultural, or other spiritual traditions that may otherwise be associated with marriage; and WHEREAS, equal access to civil marriage will not require religious or spiritual officials or institutions to perform or recognize marriages that conflict with any of their beliefs or traditions; and WHEREAS, the opportunity to publicly and legally commit to share one's life with a person of one's choice is for many people a defining aspect of human experience; and WHEREAS, denying civil marriage to gay and lesbian couples and families deprives them of certain state and federal rights, privileges, immunities, protections and responsibilities granted to others; and WHEREAS, gay and lesbian couples and families deserve, and by right ought to have, the same rights and legal protections as any others under the law, including the protection of their spousal rights and privileges and the protection of their children's familial and economic interests by insuring access to both parents and their resources; and WHEREAS, the inability to benefit from these legal protections perpetuates discrimination and results in significant harm to these couples and families, including separate standards for tax and estate planning purposes, denial of retirement and death benefits, and lack of access to family court for mediation and resolution of disputes, including dissolutions. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Ukiah declares its support for equal marriage rights for same-sex couples. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Ukiah opposes any enactment by the Federal Government and/or State of California, be it by law or Constitutional Amendment, that would ban equal access to marriage for same-sex couples and directs that copies of this resolution be transmitted to Senators Boxer and Feinstein, Congressman Thompson, Assemblywoman Berg, Senator Chesbro, the County of Mendocino, and to the cities of Point Arena, Fort Bragg and Willits. PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day of November, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mark Ashiku, Mayor ATTEST: Marie Ulvila, City Clerk AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. 1 o. b DATE: November 16, 2005 REPORT SUB.1ECT: REVI'EW OF PROPOSALS AND SELECTZON OF CONSULTANT TO PREPARE ALTERNATZVE ROUTE ANALYSTS FOR THE EXTENSTON OF ORCHARD AVENUE AND BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FUND THE PRO.1ECT SUMMARY: The City Of Ukiah recently certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approved a project to extend Orchard Avenue to Orr Creek, construct a bridge over the creek, and extend the street further to Brush Street. The Ford Street/$/dn/e Court Ne/ghborhood Committee filed a lawsuit against the City challenging the E:[R. An agreement was reached to settle the lawsuit, which required the City to consider the alternative location for Orchard Avenue and the bridge developed by the FordStreet/$/dn/e CourtNe/ghborhood Cornm/ttee. The City must fund an analysis of the alternative and determine if it represents a reasonable and feasible project alternative under the standards required by CEQA. A budget amendment is necessary to use General Fund Reserves to finance the analysis. Once the consultant has been selected, Staff will return to the City Council seeking approval of a contract. (continued on page 2) RECOMMENDAT]:ON: 1) Discuss the bid proposals and consider selecting Scheidegger & Associates; and 2) Approve a budget amendment in the amount of the contract to use General Fund Reserves to fund the project ALTERNATE COUNCTL POL?CY OP'I"~ON: Do not review the proposals or select a consultant and provide direction to Staff. Citizen Advised: Rose Zola, Plaintiff Attorney Requested by: Charley Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development Prepared by: Charley Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Bid Proposal from Leonard Charles and Associates 2. Bid Proposal from Padre Associates, :[nc. 3. Bid Proposal from Scheidegger & Associates APPROVED: Candace Horsley, City M ~"~anager Staff requested bid proposals from three environmental consulting firms. All three responded with proposals (Attachments :1 through 3). The following Table lists the firms, their proposed costs, and how much time they would need to produce the analysis: FlrRM PROPOSED COST T~MZNG 8 Weeks Leonard Charles & Associates Padre Associates, Tnc. Scheidegger & Associates $8,510 and $960 per meeting $15,695 (includes 3 meetings) $19, 990 (includes i meetincl) 5 Weeks 4 Weeks DISCUSSION: All three consulting firms are experienced and qualified, and appear to have a basic understanding of the project. Two of the firms included the optional task of preparing a Supplemental Environmental ]:mpact Report if the analysis reveals that the alternative route is within the range of reasonable alternatives which would feasibly attain most of the project objectives and would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project. Leonard Charles and Associates This firm prepared the E]:R and submitted the lowest cost for the alternative route analysis. While the City has used this firm for a variety of environmental planning work in the past, and it is clear that they are quite familiar with the project area, the submitted proposal is short and lacking detail about the approach to the project, assumptions, and proposed tasks. Padre Associates, Inc. This firm prepared a lengthy proposal detailing the history and competency of the firm, work plan, project experience, project management and personnel, and the proposed schedule and budget. While the firm seems to understand the project, the proposal appears geared towards the larger project of a Supplemental E]:R. l~t's almost as though the firm has already determined that the costly Supplemental E]:R should be required. Scheideqqer & Associates This firm has performed work for the City in the past (Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Document) and is generally familiar with the City. The proposal is concisely written and includes a Preliminary Work Program, Project Organization and Key Personnel statement, and a list of related experience. While this proposal is the most expensive, it appears that this firm has the best understanding of the project. Staff recommends that the City Council consider selecting Scheidegger & Associates even though this firm submitted the highest bid. BID PROPOSAL ORCHARD AVENUE EXTENSION ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ANALYSIS September 2005 Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Leonard Charles and Associates 7 Robie Court San Anselmo, CA 94960 415.454.4575 ATTACHMENT~ ..~.... II I Leonard Charles and Associates (LCA) proposes to prepare an analysis of an alternative location for the Orr Creek Bridge and extension of Orchard Avenue The two purposes of this study are to determine whether the alternative is feasible from environmental and traffic circulation perspectives, and whether the altemative is environmentally superior to the proposed bddge and road extension site. We propose to do the following work: Introduction Provide an introduction that summarizes the findings of the existing EI R, describes the alternative, and describes the relationship of this project to the existing El R. Traffic Assess and compare the traffic circulation effects of the proposed alternates with the original bridge/extension plan. Mark Crane of the Crane Transportation.Group will assess the impacts of the alternative on future traffic flows along Orchard Avenue to determine whether either of the proposed alternate routes would result in sufficient driver delay to cause drivers to use Ford Street or other local streets to access North State Street (i.e., by making the route longer and requiring turns, the alternate routes would take longer to drive than the proposed route; at some point, the additional delay can result in some drivers abandoning the extension and using Ford Street, Bush Street, or Ford Road to access North State Street). This assessment will necessarily be qualitative, based on Mr. Crane's experience and knowledge of travel patterns in the area. The potential displacement of traffic cannot be quantified. If he believes that traffic would be displaced from the Orchard Avenue extension, he will discuss the effects that could have on the affected streets. He will assess the alternates' consistency with City and County design guidelines for arterials. He will discuss the consistency of the alternates with the proposed design for diamond ramps connecting Brush Street with Highway 101 (as shown in the 2005 MCOG Route 101 Corridor Interchange Study). The proposed alternate as currently designed would interfere with the preliminary design of the diamond interchange ramp. We will also discuss the consistency of the proposed road 'alignment with other EIR recommendations that concern recommended land uses in the Brush Street Triangle adjacent to Highway 101. On a preliminary basis, Mr. Crane believes that the alternate could be designed with S- curves at both its north and south ends (thereby eliminating 90-degree turn movements) to minimize the loss of travel time resulting from the proposed movement of the street. It could also be possible to alter the alternative so it would not interfere with the potential future southbound Highway 101 on-ramp. We would work with the proponent and the City to identify an optimum travel route using the alternate bridge site to allow the City to determine the cost of that option. This effort ensures that the alternative route is defined in a feasible manner (i.e., does not interfere with future ramps and unnecessarily reduce travel time), thereby allowing an objective analysis of a feasible alternative. Orchard Avenue Extension Analysis - Bid Proposal Leonard Chades and Associates Page 1 Noise Illingworth & Rodkin, the acoustic engineers who prepared the noise analysis for the completed EIR, will recalculate noise impacts generated by traffic on the Orchard Avenue extension on the sensitive receptors at the existing north end of Orchard Avenue. The relocation of the road and bddge would reduce the noise impact at these apartments. Determine whether the reduction is sufficient to make the impact less than significant and eliminate the need for noise mitigation at this locale. Qualitatively discuss the potential noise increases if traffic is diverted to other streets due to the relocation of Orchard Avenue. Biological Resources Charles Patterson, the biologist who prepared the original biological assessment, will assess the biological impacts of constructing the bddge and road in the alternate location. The impacts will be compared to those identified for the odginal location. This will include a discussion of the potential benefits of preserving a longer undisturbed creek section. We will compare the consistency of the two sites with recommendations made in the Orrs Creek Habitat Enhancement and Flood Control Study. If, warranted, new mitigation measures would be recommended for the new location. Alternative Feasibility Determine whether the alternative location is feasible from an environmental perspective. The City will be responsible for assessing engineering and fiscal feasibility. Comparison of Alternatives Compare the alternative bddge site and the three alternative road layouts (i.e., the two proposed and the one to be developed by our team) with the alternatives identified in the completed EIR. Identify the environmentally superior alternative, not considering engineering or fiscal feasibility. Staff and Expertise The same firms who prepared the original EIR would do the work for this report. Statements of qualification and resumes for the people who would prepare this report are attached. LCA and these same subconsultants have prepared numerous EIRs in the project area, including the original EIR for the project. LCA is currently completing the EIR for the Ukiah Valley Area Plan, preparing the EIR for the proposed RCHDC project in the study area, and will be preparing the El R for the Hop Kiln Ranch project just to the northeast of the study area. Orchard Avenue Extension Analysis - Bid Proposal Leonard Chades and Associates Page 2 Products We will submit one camera-ready administrative draft report. After receipt of comments, we will submit one camera-ready draft report. Meetings Leonard Charles will attend one kick-off meeting with City staff. The City may wish to have the parties who prepared the alternative present so that we can discuss whether another alternate road layout should be assessed. Schedule From the time the City authorizes us to start work, we can prepare and submit a draft report within six (6) weeks. The final report would be submitted within two (2) weeks of receipt of all City comments. Cost This report will be prepared for a fixed price of $8,410. The following describes the cost for each tasks: Cost Project Administration/Management $700 Kick-off Meeting 960 Introduction 300 Traffic 1,900 Noise 950 Biological Resources 1,500 Feasibility of Alternative 250 Alternatives Analysis 600 Graphics 250 Report Writing/Editing 1,100 Tota/ $8,510 Optional Costs Work outside the scope of services listed above can be arranged for an additional cost. . The cost for Leonard Chades to attend a public meeting/hearing would be an additional $960 per meeting. Orchard Avenue Extension Analysis - Bid Proposal Leonard Chades and Associates Page 3 Assumptions The scope of work is based on the following assumptions: o The analysis will not revisit the land use assumptions and the trip generation calculations included in the completed Final EIR (FEIR) for the bridge and road extension project. The traffic and noise analyses will solely examine the difference in impacts from moving the bridge and road to the east. . The City will be responsible for determining the engineering and fiscal feasibility of the alternative. . LCA can work with the parties who developed the alternative and the City to develop an alternative that may meet the basic objective of the parties who challenged the EIR (i.e., moving the bridge as far east as feasible) while reducing other potentially significant effects (e.g., potential redistribution of traffic to Ford Street due to two 90-degree turns on the alternate route). The analysis would then assess the two proposed routes plus a third alternative that meets the challengers' objective while maximizing the ability of the Orchard Avenue extension to be a north-south arterial. . The report is not intended to be a CEQA document. The City will use the report to determine what, if any, changes will be made to the previously-approved FEIR Orchard Avenue Extension Analysis - Bid Proposal Leonard Chades and Associates Page 4 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Leonard Charles and Associates 7 Robie Court San Anselmo, California 94960 415.454.4575 415.454.2585 (Fax) Icharlesassociates@comcast. net (email) INTRODUCTION Leonard Chades and Associates (LCA) is an environmental and land use consulting firm providing both specialized and comprehensive environmental services to govemmental, public, and non-profit agencies and groups. Since 1977, our services have included the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), all other CEQA- required and NEPA-required documents, General Plans, Land Management Plans, ResoUrce Management Plans, and Environmental Assessments. Many of the projects we have worked on have been highly controversial and therefore subject to the intense scrutiny of public agencies and the general public. In each case, our work has been praised for its thoroughness, total objectivity, and creative and practical approach to developing altematives and mitigation measures. The following attributes best distinguish LCA: LCA maintains a small permanent staff; most members of the staff have twenty years' experience in preparing EIRs and similar analyses. The advantage of a small, core staff is that the client is assured that reports are prepared only by experienced professionals who are principals in the firm. We augment the skills of our staff with a select group of technical experts. We have worked with this group of subconsultants on dozens of projects over a period ranging from five to twenty years and maintain a coordinated working relationship with them. The use of these subconsultants ensures that, when necessary, we have experts in the appropriate field addressing technical issues. Our staff includes professional writers who ensure' that technical reports are well written and can be easily understood by laypeople. Our twenty years of experience mean that our staff is familiar with the range of impacts that can be expected from most types of projects. We are also well acquainted with most of the geographic regions of Northem California, and we know many of the staff members of pertinent State and County reviewing agencies. The fact that LCA does not seek work in the private sector ensures our objectivity in assessing projects. Over the years, this objectivity has helped us earn a solid reputation for the unbiased nature of our reports. Our approach and reputation are especially beneficial when an agency is confronted with a highly controversial project. LCA is commonly awarded contracts to prepare EIRs on the most controversial projects, often projects where the court has ordered the preparation of an EIR. Given our experience with many controversial projects, we are very familiar with the legal requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Our EIRs are often prepared as the result of lawsuits. Though many of our EIRs have bccn scrutinized for their legal adequacy, we have never had one of our EIRs challenged in the courts. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Using the skills of staff ecologists and planners in conjunction with specialized consultants, Leonard Charles and Associates provides the following services: Environmental Assessment and Impact Report Preparation · Residential projects: residential developments in both urban and rural settings · Industrial development: mineral extraction, geothermal and energy facilities, and all types of industrial development · Commercial projects: shopping centers, office parks, business parks, downtown redevelopment, and all other types of commercial development · General Plans: preparation of general plan and specific plan environmental assessments and EIRs · Public infrastructure: schools, jails, wastewater facilities, potable water systems, roads, pipelines, solid waste facilities, and fire management plans · Natural resources: analysis of dparian ecosystems, development of erosion control programs, watershed rehabilitation, and biotic impacts · Parks and recreation: site design assessment, social and economic impacts, and master plans · Open space: development of open space land use plans · Timber resources: Program Timberland EIP, s (PTEIRs) and vineyard conversion EIRs · Mapping: computer mapping and graphics CECtA Analysis · CEQA reports: 'Initial Studies, constraints analyses, existing conditions reports, Negative Declarations, EIRs, Findings, and all CEQA-required noticing and reporting elements on all public and private projects · NEPA reports: Environmental Assessments, EISs, FONSIs, and E~ preparation · Monitoring: mitigation monitoring programs and on-site monitoring Other Planning Studies Nexus studies: studies required to determine the nexus for development fee collection Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates Resource management plans: fire and vegetation management plans, park and open space master plans, and management plans for specific resources Ecological Investigations Biological resource analysis: wildlife surveys, habitat evaluation, vegetation analysis and mapping, and botanical surveys Ecological baseline studies and monitoring: plant and animal population studies and measurement of vegetation succession and recovery Fire hazard reduction: studies of fire hazards and development of complete vegetation and fire management plans Natural Resource Planning Watershed rehabilitation: erosion control programs, reclamation planning, and revegetation and reforestation analysis and plans Vegetation management: plans to manage vegetation to control critical fire danger and maintain biodiversity and other natural resources of the area Fish and wildlife management: habitat mitigation plans, habitat and species management plans, and habitat rehabilitation Natural resource plans: riparian and waterway management plans, forest management plans, and land capability and constraints analyses Erosion control plans: preparation of plans to meet new TIVlDL requirements for North Coast watersheds Land Use Plannin~ General plans and specific plans: preparation, revision, and evaluation of general and specific plans; preparation of public facilities elements Area studies: analysis of projects in conjunction with area-wide development, public infrastructure analysis for area development, environmental analysis, and development of area plans Implementation programs: development plans, subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and other implementing programs Park and open space planning: planning of local and regional parks, resource planning, and analysis of private proposals Mineral Production · Aggregate management plans: development of gravel management plans Reclamation plans: development of plans to meet SMARA and local reclamation regulations Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates AWARDS In December 1998, the Mount Tamalpais Area Vegetation Management Plan prepared by LCA was awarded the Theodore Roosevelt Environmental Award for Excellence by the California Association of Califomia Water Agencies. CUENTS Past clients have included: · State of Califomia, Department of General Services · County of Sonoma · County of Lake · County of Mendocino · County of Madn · County of Santa Cruz · County of Calaveras · City of Dixon · City of Lafayette · City of Cloverdale · City of Cotati · City of Healdsburg · City of Petaluma · City of Sebastopol · City of Sonoma · City of Lakeport · City of Cleadake · City of Ukiah · City of Willits · City of Fort Bragg · City of Novato · City of San Rafael · Town of Mill Valley · Town of Tiburon · Lake County Special Districts · Mendocino Council of Governments · Marin Municipal Water Distdct · North Matin Water District · Lake County Special Districts · Madn County Open Space District · Harmony Union School Distdct · Monte Rio Union School District · Piner-Olivet Union School Distdct · lu Mien Cultural Association · Ukiah Valley Sanitation Distdct · Mendocino County Water Agency · Calpella County Water Distdct · Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd. · Numerous non-profit and neighborhood groups Any of these past clients may be contacted for references. Specific contacts for references will be supplied upon request. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: RESIDENTIAL LCA prepares EIRs and other environmental analyses on all types of residential developments. This includes typical single-family projects in both urban and rural settings as well as multi-family projects. Some examples of these types of projects are summarized below. Armstrong Heights LCA prepared a full EIR on the proposed subdivision located in the 100-year floodplain of the Russian River, Sonoma County. The F_IR focused on hydrologic, biotic, and neighborhood impacts. Due to community concern, a detailed analysis of project altematives was conducted. The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors eventually approved one of the project alternatives. Palm Terrace and Saddleburr Subdivision LCA prepared a full EIR on two controversial subdivisions located adjacent to the Laguna de Santa Rosa in Sebastopol. This EF{ was ordered by the court. Detailed analyses of project impacts on the sensitive Laguna ecosystem were included. In addition, the EIR included detailed assessments of public services, traffic and noise. A full fiscal analysis was included. Broadmoor Estates Subdivision This full ER focused on the effects of this Sonoma County subdivision on vemal pools. The site included numerous vemal pools and populations of rare plants. Pools and plant population were accurately mapped and described. The ER also focused on traffic, public services, and community impacts. The proposal was abandoned, and the site was eventually purchased for permanent open space. Consani Property, Creekside Meadows, and Hembree Meadows This was a focused ER done for Sonoma County on three contiguous residential developments in the Windsor area. The projects included 174 dwelling units, combining single-family residences with condominiums. In addition to examining the specific impacts relative to the projects, the report examined the impacts that would result from further development of this area, and more generally in all of the Windsor area. This analysis was used to guide growth in the area pending the completion of a new Specific Plan for the community. The ER included detailed analyses of drainage and hydrology, wildlife and vegetation, land use, public services, visual quality, traffic, and community. Ginesi Rentals This was a full EIR on a proposed 70-unit multi-family project in the Sonoma Valley. Particular attention was given to the areas of traffic, hydrology, loss of agricultural land, and public services. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: RESIDENTIAL Thysen Planned United Development LCA was engaged by the City of Cotati to prepare a full EIR on a proposed planned unit development that included 114 apartment units and 24,000 square feet of offices. The EIR focused on traffic, visual, and biotic impacts. Gravenstein Highway North Annexation This EIR assessed a proposed single-family and multi-family residential development in Sebastopol. Particular areas of focus included agricultural, traffic, visual quality, drainage, and public service impacts. Oak Park Estates LCA prepared a full EIR on a proposed subdivision near Lakeport in Lake County. Particular attention was focused on site contamination since the site was once used for the Lakeport Sanitation District's wastewater ponds. Extensive soil testing was conducted. Other areas of focus included hydrology, traffic, fiscal, and public service impacts. Harris Hills Subdivision LCA prepared a focused EIR addressing the traffic and growth-inducing impacts resulting from a 9-lot rural residential subdivision north of Sebastopol. Vichy Sprin._qs Subdivision LCA prepared a full F_IR on a proposed 30-acre subdivision near the City of Ukiah in Mendocino County. The principal issues were wildlife and vegetation, traffic, geology, and hydrology. Crocker Ranch Estates We prepared a full EIR on a proposed 18-1ot rural subdivision located on 277 acres near the Russian River in Sonoma County. The site consisted of steep topography so a thorough geotechnical analysis was conducted. Other important areas of impact included traffic, effects on oaks and other vegetation, water availability, and fire danger. Round Hill Subdivision This was a full ER on a subdivision located in the Town of Tiburon. Particular emphasis was give to geologic constraints, runoff from the site, loss of oak trees, and effects on public services. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Chades and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: RESIDENTIAL Creek View Estates We prepared a full EIR on a proposed 75-unit subdivision on 60 acres in Willits (Mendocino County). The site was a hillside property so emphasis was given to geologic concerns and visual effects. Cherry Avenue Planned Development We prepared a Constraints Analysis for development of a 50-acre site in the Sonoma Valley. The analysis was used to develop a site plan. The project was done for the County of Sonoma. Old Corporation Yard - Senior Housin.q_ Project LCA prepared a complete EIR on a proposed 40-unit Iow income senior housing project, in Healdsburg The site was adjacent to the Russian River and required a full hydrologic analysis for flooding impacts. Other areas of particular concern that were addressed included geology, recreational access, visual effects, and housing impacts. Quietwater Subdivision We prepared a full EIR on a proposed 17-1ot rural subdivision on an 85-acre parcel in Sonorna County. Site access was a principal concern since it required bridging a major stream. Other areas of concern that were addressed included biotic effects, hydrology, traffic, visual quality, and fire hazard. Page Park Estates This was a full EIR prepared on a proposed 24-1ot subdivision in the City of Lakeport. Particular attention was paid to site design alternatives, traffic and impacts on public services. Orchard Park LCA prepared a full EIR on a 48-1ot subdivision in Sebastopol. Particular attention was given to hydrology, vegetation, traffic, visual effects, public services, and proximity to a propane storage facility. Harris Hills Subdivision This was a focused EIR prepared for a proposed 9-lot rural subdivision. focused on traffic impacts and a detailed analysis of project alternatives. The ER Statement of Qualifications Leonard Chades and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: RESIDENTIAL Leth-Nissen Major Subdivision This was a focused F_IR prepared for Sonoma County on a proposed residential lot split in the Dry Creek Valley, a prime viticultural area. The focus of the report was on the project's compatibility with the goals and policies of the County's General Plan, particularly as regards the preservation of agriculture. Major factors addressed included the agricultural capabilities of the site, vineyard management practices, residential/agricultural interface problems, acreage necessary to support full-time farming in the area, economic impacts, and the long-term impacts of residential subdivision on Valley agriculture. Parente Residential Development LCA prepared an EIR for a proposed hillside subdivision in Tiburon for the Town of Tiburon. The project site contained a portion of a Town-designated ddgeline. TI~ EIR focused on traffic, noise, and visual impacts. A lengthy assessment of alternatives was developed to minimize impact to the visual resources of the ddgeline. While the Final EIR has been completed, it has not been certified, as the applicant may alter the site plan to incorporate recommendations of the EIR. Sorokko Residential Development LCA was under contract with the Town of Tiburon to prepare an EIR for a 5-lot subdivision. The project site contained substantial environmental constraints. As w e neared completion of the Draft EIR, the applicant changed the project design team. Once a new design is completed, we will prepare a new Draft EIR. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: MIXED LAND USES LCA prepares EIRs and all other types of environmental reviews for complex projects that may include commercial, industrial, and single-family and multi-family residential development. Some examples of this type of project are summarized below. Parducci's Vintners Village This was a full EIR prepared for Mendocino County on a large motel, restaurant, and shopping 'center complex located on Highway 101 north of Ukiah. The project included a 200-unit motel, a restaurant/convention center, and a 40,000 square foot shopping center. The project was to have bccn the first development in an area traditionally reserved for agricultural use, and the long-term effects on agriculture in the area were a major focus of the report. At the time, there were several planning options for the area prepared by the Planning Department, the City of Uldah, and a Citizens Advisory Committee. The report examined the project relative to the different land use patterns that could result from the implementation of these vadous plans. The report was a full EF{ with detailed investigations of drainage, air quality, traffic, land use, noise, public services, visual quality, and community impacts. The report included a major analysis of the extension of public services, especially sewers, into the area. The base data in the report were used to guide further growth in the area. Dubrava Villape This was a full EIR prepared for the County of Sonoma on a large, mixed-use project on the Russian River west of Guemeville. The project included 91 condominiums, a 20,000 square foot commercial center, and a large resort inn/restaurant complex. Critical areas that were assessed were hydrology (the site was within the 100-year floodplain), geology, biotic resources, noise, visual quality, traffic, and recreation. Land use and public services were assessed in great detail as there was considerable controversy surrounding the project; a new sewer system was being installed, and we had to determine if the project would use up the surplus in the not- yet-completed, system. This necessitated a determination of area demographics; these demographics were a surpdse to the local community and formed the basis for further debate over area development. Much of the data developed in this report w a s later used as base environmental data for the area. Crinella Subdivision This was a full EIR prepared for Sonoma County on a residential/commercial project located in Forestville. The project included 89 single-family residences, 12 multi-family units, and 20,000 square feet of commercial development. The project site was one of the last large acreages in the area, and development of the site was the focus of considerable public controversy. The EIR addressed all areas of impact with special emphasis placed on public services, visual impacts, and impacts on community character. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: MIXED LAND USES London Lake Village LCA first prepared a constraints analysis for the proposed development of a 30,000 square foot shopping center, 160 multi-family units, 50 rental units, and an on-site lake. The project was designed using this analysis. Then, an F_IR was prepared which focused on hydrology, the design of the lake, traffic, noise, land use, retention of landmark oaks, and public services. The County of Sonoma, for whom this report was prepared, was especially concerned that the project be well designed, as it was the last large development in the Boyes Springs area of the Sonoma Valley. The two- stage development of a constraints analysis and EIR was well received by the County, the developer, and the public alike. Hillcrest Ranch LCA prepared a full FIR on a proposed residential (209 units) and commercial development located in Lake County. Given the site's location between two communities, the EIR focused on growth-including impacts and effects on agriculture. The ER included detailed analyses of drainage, traffic, visual quality, and public services. Hillcrest Ranch Fiscal Analysis The Hillcrest Ranch subdivision was downsized from the original proposal after the ER prepared by LCA was presented. The new proposal included 130 single-family residences for senior citizens and 4,000 square feet of commercial space compared to the original 209 residences and 3.6 acres of commercial usage. The Lake County Planning Department requested that LCA prepare a fiscal analysis of the reduced- size subdivision. The report analyzed and compared project revenues, both one-time and ongoing, and costs to the County for public services, such as police and fire protection, education, health and sanitation, etc. West Gravenstein Corridor Specific Plan This was a full ER prepared on a Specific Plan for an area in west Cotati (Sonoma County). This Specific Plan included a mix of commercial development along the Gravenstein Highway and office and residential uses behind the commercial strip. We assessed three alternative land use mixes presented in the Specific Plan. Particular emphasis was given to traffic, visual effects, and wetlands. Orr Creek Bridge and Orchard Avenue Extension LCA prepared an EIR on a bddge and roadway widening project that opened up 100 acres of land adjacent to Highway 101 for development. LCA assessed the cumulative impacts of future commercial development on this 100-acre property. The EIR was prepared for the City of Ukiah. The data presented in the ER will be used by the City and/or the County to guide annexation and development of the study area. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Chades and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: AREA STUDIES LCA prepares specific plans, redevelopment plans, area plans, and EIRs on those plans. Southwest Dixon Specific Plan LCA is completing an EIR on a specific plan that would allow 1,200 new homes, major commerdal development, and a large employment center on 500 acres on the southwest edge of the City of Dixon. The EIR is both a Program EIR on buildout of the plan area and a project-Specific EIR for five development proposals within the plan area. The EIR assesses all areas of impact with particular attention on circulation and public services. Lovers Lane Specific Plan LCA prepared an Environmental Constraints Analysis for a 250-acre area located north of Uldah. Based on this ECA, a Specific Plan to develop the area with 1,000- 1,360 residences was developed. LCA then prepared a full EIR on that Specific Plan. The EIR included detailed analyses of geologic hazards, drainage, air quality, public service improvements, housing, agricultural impacts, noise, and visual quality. This project was the largest residential project ever proposed in Mendocino County. There was extensive public input that we addressed in the Final EIR. South Fitch Mountain Road Corridor Study This study was a master EIR for possible residential development of neady 40 acres of land on the edge of the City of Healdsburg; the acreage was in several different ownerships, and there was no firm development proposal for any of the properties. Our report laid out the environmental impacts that could be expected at a vadety of levels of residential density. The altematives were compared, and the least impacting altemative was determined. In addition, for the traffic analysis, we considered the future development of the entire South Fitch Mountain Road Corridor (an additional 735 undeveloped lots) in determining impacts to the road system. City, of Cotati Specific Plan LCA prepared a full EIR on a Specific Plan to annex approximately 400 acres to the City of Cotati. The EIR particularly focused on the impacts resulting from a proposed 300-unit residential development on 160 acres of the Study Area; this proposed development would expand the City's housing stock by 25 percent. Emphases were the public service infrastructure, drainage, traffic, visual quality, land use, growth- inducement, and alternatives. Based on concerns raised in the Draft EIR, the applicant determined to abandon the project. The development dghts to the site were purchased by the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District. Ukiah Western Hills Study LCA prepared a constraints analysis and recommendations for new development in the hills bordering the west side of the City of Ukiah. The City will use this report to revise its Zoning Ordinance and reduce the allowable new development in this hillside area. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Chades and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: COMMERCIAL LCA prepares EIRs and other environmental assessments for all types of commercial and office development, including office and business parks, shopping 'centers, downtown redevelopment projects, large discount stores, and all other types of development. Some examples of this type of work are summarized below. Clearlake Shopping Center This was a full F_IR prepared on a proposed 250,000 square foot shopping center in the town of Cleadake. The project is the largest commercial center in the county. The Ell:{ focused on hydrologic, traffic, visual, public service, economic, and airport safety impacts. Maxwell Village Sho_D_oing Center This was a full EIR prepared on a proposed 94,000 square foot shopping center located on Highway 12 outside the City of Sonoma. The F. JO, included a full assessment of site biota, drainage, air quality, visual quality, public services, noise, traffic', and community impacts. A fiscal analysis was prepared since the project included annexation to the City. This analysis was extended to included several adjacent developments that the City was also considering annexing. A basic economic assessment of the project's impacts on existing businesses was included. Finally, a detailed assessment of how the project '~t" with an adjacent regional park was prepared. A full range of project alternatives was analyzed. Fort Brago Shopping Center (Kmart) LCA prepared a full EIR on a proposed shopping center in Fort Bragg. The project included over 130,000 square feet of commercial space anchored by a Kmart Store, 33,000 square feet of motel space, and 60 residential units. The EIR included a full fiscal/economic analysis and a visual analysis that incorporated photomontage techniques. All other areas of potential impact were addressed. Unocal Service Station and Car Wash We prepared a full EIR on a proposed remodeling of a gas station to include a car wash. The project was within the City of Mill Valley, Marin County. Particular emphasis was given to traffic and aesthetic effects since the site is adjacent to the City's proposed new Community Center. Hare Creek Inn We prepared a full EIR on a proposed 52 unit motel located off Highway 20 in Fort Bragg. The EIR focused on biotic, traffic, public service, aesthetic, and land use impacts. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: COMMERCIAL Emerald Dolphin Inn We prepared a full I~R on a proposed 42 unit motel on Highway One in Fort Bragg. The BR focused on aesthetics (the site is within the Coastal Zone), traffic, public services, hydrology, and land use impacts. Beachcomber Motel We prepared a full EIR on a proposed 48 unit motel addition on Highway One in Fort Bragg. The EIR focused on archeology, traffic, aesthetics (the site is within the Coastal Zone), water, and effects on an adjacent State park. Wal-Mart Store and Airport Industrial Park Planned Development LCA was engaged to prepare an EIR on a propoSed Wal-Mart Store (130,000 square feet) on a commercial/industrial planned development. This was a very controversial project, and the EIR was prepared as a result of a lawsuit. The EIR included three levels of analysis: a full analysis of the proposed Wal-Mart Store, an analysis of the changes in impacts due to proposed land use changes in the surrounding industrial park, and an analysis of the cumulative impacts of buildout of the 150-acre industrial park. The EIR included a major traffic analysis and assessment of public service problems. On the request of the City, a full economic assessment of the impact of buildout on the existing downtown commercial center was conducted, including community surveys to determine retail "leakage." The site included a rare plant population, and a detailed mitigation plan was proposed. Other areas of focus included flooding, drainage, visual, and air quality impacts. Redwood Business Park This EIR assessed impacts from development of the business park that is adjacent to the Wal-Mart Store in Ukiah described above. The EIR addressed environmental impacts from development of over 800,000 square feet of commercial and industrial development on the 100-acre business park. It was a full EIR that incorporated much of the analysis done for the Wal-Mart Store. Airport Business Park This EIR assessed impacts resulting from development of the proposed Mendocino Brewing Company's new brewing and bottling facility as well as additional industrial development on a 27-acre industrial park in Ukiah. The full range of impacts were analyzed; wetlands and traffic were particularly sensitive areas. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: SCHOOLS LCA works with school districts in selecting potential new school sites, and working with Citizen Advisory Committees in the selection process. We provide constraints analysis of potential sites as well as conducting the full CEQA process, including Initial Studies, Negative Declarations, and EIRs. We can complete the entire CEQA process for districts not familiar with State environmental requirements. Some examples of this type of work are summarized below. Monte Rio School LCA prepared a Negative Declaration for a proposed new school site for the Monte Rio School District, Sonoma County. The Negative Declaration and the expanded In'dial StudY assessed all possible significant impacts and recommended mitigation measures, in addition, LCA guided the distdct through the CEQA review process. Harmony Union School District LCA was hired to assist a Citizens Advisory Committee to identify, rank, and select a new school site for the Harmony School Distdct in Occidental. The search for a new site was very controversial; LCA used 45 different cfiteda to rank 22 different sites. Upon selection of the best site, LCA prepared a full EIR on the proposed new 450- student school on that site. The EIR focused especially on biota (due to the presence of an endangered species), sewage disposal (on-site disposal), water, drainage, traffic, land use, and project alternatives. The investigation of alternatives included an assessment of altemative sites, year-round schooling, expansion of the existing campus, deannexation of a portion of the district, and unification with neighboring districts. After approval of the project, LCA was engaged to monitor project construction to ensure compliance with the mitigation monitoring plan. City of 10,000 Buddhas Training Academy LCA was engaged to prepare a full EIR on a proposal to construct an 850,000 square foot private university on agricultural land in Mendocino County. The project included numerous 5-10 story buildings. The EIR focused on impacts of agriculture, views, public services, geology, and biota. Needless to say, this project was controversial given the size and proposed use of the buildings in a rural, agricultural setting. The initial project was rejected by the County due to visual and other impacts. The applicant submitted a new proposal five years later, and we prepared a full EIR on that second proposal. The applicant again revised the project, and we prepared a third EIR on that project. This final EIR was certified, and a modified project was approved. Jack London Elementary School We assisted the Piner-Olivet Union School Distdct in selecting a new school site. VVe prepared a full EIR for the proposed new elementary and charter school. Our work included preparation of a mitigation monitoring program and preparation of draft Findings for the project. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates · RECENT PROJECTS: JAILS LCA is experienced in assessing the environmental effects of new jails. We are familiar with the unique effects of such projects and the parameters such as bedspace projections and altemative jail designs. Some examples of jail projects w e have worked on are summarized below. San Quentin Prison Correctional Treatment center LCA has prepared an Initial Study for a proposed new medical facility on San Quentin State Prison. The State Board of Corrections is currently revising the plan for this facility. Once the project revision is complete, LCA will prepare either a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR on the revised project. Sonoma County Jail LCA prepared an EIR on. the new Sonoma County Jail - a Court-ordered forty million dollar project. The EIR on this controversial facility focused on a review of bedspace projections for the facility, long-term impacts on land use at the County Administrative Center, future use of the existing jail, visual quality, and traffic. A detailed assessment of alternatives was presented including alternative types of jails and alternative locations. Sonoma County Jail Supplementary EIR Following the certification of the odginal EIR on this project, the building design Was completely changed. LCA prepared an in-depth visual analysis of the new design. In addition, the County requested that we assess the impacts of the project on the adjacent neighborhood - impacts assessed included noise, traffic, dust, and change in neighborhood character. Leke County Sheriff's Department and Jail Complex This EIR was prepared on the proposed jail/sheriff's department complex for the County of Lake. The site was in a rural location outside the City of Lakeport. The report focused on site constraints - geology, drainage, public services, and impacts as regards traffic, visual quality (the site is located in a Scenic Corridor), and community character. Lake County Jail Supplementary EIR Pdor to the certification of the EIR on the Lake County Jail, the County altered the project by acquiring an adjacent parcel and redesigning the project to use that parcel. The Supplementary EIR assessed the same issues assessed in the odginal EIR for the expanded site and new design. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: NATURAL RESOURCES PLANNING LCA prepares resource and land management plans for parks, open space preserves, watersheds, and pdvate properties. We have prepared the model fire management plan for the urban/wildland interface. We also conduct al! types of ecological analyses of wildlife, vegetation, and other natural resources. Some of these types of studies are summarized below. Vegetation and Fire Management Baseline Studies for the Mount Tamalpais Area LCA was the prime contractor for conducting a multi-year study of vegetation and fire management on lands belonging to the Madn Municipal Water District and the Marin County Open Space District in the Mount Tamalpais area. The first phase of this study involved gathering baseline data on vegetation, wildlife, wildfire hazard, and potential impacts of alternative vegetation management scenarios. The studies were conducted by several well-known experts in the fields of chaparral ecology, fire ecology, and wildlife management. LCA, as pdme contractor, directed this research and acted as liaison with public agencies and the community. This study was quite controversial due to the opposition of many segments of the local community to any proposal for controlled burning on Mount Tamalpais. Upon adoption of this study, the 'Districts proceeded to authorize a second phase of the study aimed at developing a specific plan for decreasing fire hazards on the lands. Feral Pig Study This eight-month study was conducted for the Marin Municipal Water District, the Madn Open Space District, and the Audubon Canyon Ranch. These districts manage over 27,000 acres of land in west Matin County. These lands were suffedng rooting damage from feral pigs. To assist the districts in determining what measures should be adopted for controlling the pig population, we conducted some basic research on pig damage. This included setting up plots to measure sedimentation off of rooted and non-rooted areas and establishing vegetation survey plots (where we measured species diversity and spread of vegetative recovery). The study also defined pig ethology in the area and compiled data about where pigs had rooted and where they had been captured in the past five years. Two years after completion of the study, we were hired to resurvey Marin Water District lands to determine the range and numbers of wild pigs in the Mount Tamalpais area. The study included resurveying vegetation plots established in prior years to determine the rate of revegetation. Land Use and Agricultural Proposal for the lu Mien Cultural Association The lu Mien Cultural Association (lu Mien are a group of Laotian refugee people) made a proposal to the San Francisco Foundation to receive a 1,700-acre property owned by the Foundation to use for an agricultural community of 500 people. We were engaged to prepare a land use study, an agricultural feasibility study and a cultural impact study for the proposal. Our studies showed the feasibility of the project and included numerous interviews with the local community to determine social problems that might result from the resettlement. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: NATURAL RESOURCES PLANNING Ve._qetation Management Plan for the Mount Tamalpais Area LCA was hired to prepare a detailed Vegetation Management Plan and the EIR for that Plan on 21,000 acres belonging to the Marin Municipal Water District and the Madn County Open Space District. A primary goal of this Plan was to determine measures required to decrease the fire hazard on the Study Area which includes over seven miles of interface with residential areas. The Districts were extremely concerned about the potential for wildfire starting on or crossing their property and destroying expensive residences in the interface. Additional concems addressed in the Plan include potential wildfire damage to the watershed, water quality, sensitive plant and wildlife species, views, and recreational resources. The Plan was prepared by a team of 16 specialists in the areas of fire ecology, forestry, botany, wildlife biology, geology, hydrology, etc. The Plan includes detailed recommendations (with working maps showing the locations of recommended actions) on ways to decrease the existing fire hazard, remove exotic species like broom, restore native grasslands and oak woodlands, and other vegetation- related concems. The Plan includes a full legal review of liability issues, further development of the GIS installed as part of the Baseline Studies (see above), and preparation of a new digitized orthophoto for the Study Area. A full EIR on the Plan was prepared conterminously with Plan preparation. A full, formal public participation process including interviews, newsletters, press releases, community workshops, and a community survey were included due to the controversial nature of certain fire hazard reduction methods (e.g., prescribed burning). In December, 1998, this plan was awarded the Theodore Roosevelt Environmental Award for Excellence by the California Association of California Water Agencies. Mount Tamalpais Road Study We are currently preparing an Initial Study for a road and trail erosion control plan being prepared for the Madn Municipal Water District. This plan identifies needed erosion-control improvements for about 100 miles of fire roads and 105 miles of trails. It is anticipated that the Initial Study will lead to a Program EIR. Pacific Marine Farms Aquaculture Project LCA is under contract to prepare an EIR for the largest abalone aquaculture project in the U.S. as well as one of the largest in the world. The applicant proposes to produce shdmp, salmon, and abalone on a parcel adjacent to the sea in Fort Bragg. The EIR will include a full assessment of methods of withdrawing and circulating seawater (over 12,000,000 gallons per day will be used), impacts to sea life from water withdrawals and discharges, disease control, pollution control, and impacts to kelp and wild fish stocks, noise, odors, aesthetics, and land use. The EIR will also include assessment of a number of alternatives requested by State reviewing agencies, including the use of Horizontal Directional Ddlling of the pipelines. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: NATURAL RESOURCES PLANNING Dubrava Village Redwoods LCA prepared an earlier full EIR on this mixed-use project; however, at a later stage, the project was altered so that one-third of the large redwood trees on the site were to be removed. This was a very controversial proposal given the area and the previous history of the project. LCA conducted a tree-by-tree analysis to determine which trees had to be removed because of health, crowding, or other natural causes. The site plans were examined to determine what changes could be made to save trees. In addition to mapping those trees that had to be removed, LCA provided a complete, detailed listing of measUres to be taken dudng logging to insure the long- term health of the remaining trees. Cypress Hills Cemetery This study was a biotic resources survey of a portion of a cemetery in the City of Petaluma that was slated for residential development. The City wished to know if there were. significant populations of plants or animals on the site before approving the rezoning of the land. LCA performed a complete biological survey of the site. The report included a complete mapping of all trees on the site. Sycamore Heights LCA was contracted to review a residential development proposal for its impact on site trees. Our recommendation was that trees should and could be preserved. We worked with the project planners and engineers to redesign the project to preserve as many trees as possible. A second phase of this project had us conduct on-site monitoring to insure tree preservation. This included making on-the-spot recommendations regarding grading, drainage systems, and pruning. This monitoring phase lasted for more than three months. Aaron Acres Biotic Survey LCA conducted a biotic survey of the site for a proposed residential subdivision on the western edge of Petaluma. The survey focused on the impacts on rare and unique bird species. Bella Vista Biotic Survey LCA was engaged to conduct a biotic survey for a proposed residential development in Healdsburg. 'the study included making recommendations as to how to preserve ripadan woodlands and habitat for rare and endangered species. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE LCA prepares Land Management Plans for all types of parks and open space preserves. This includes identification of trail routes and trail construction techniques. Cascade Canyon and White Hill Open Space Preserves Land Management Plan LCA has completed a draft land management plan for these two adjacent preserves owned and operated by the Madn County Open Space District. in addition to assessing the condition of natural resources on the preserves, the plan contains a detailed fire management plan, since the preserves border the Town of Fairfax which includes hundreds of homes in the wildland/urban interface. The plan also provides considerable detail on current and future trail use because of the significant controversy over bicycle use on the preserves. The preserves include Repack Road which is considered the birthplace of mountain biking. LCA is currently completing an EIR on the plan. Lafferty Ranch Park LCA was contracted to prepare a Constraints and Opportunities Report for the potential development of a regional park on a 280-acre parcel on the west slope of Sonoma Mountain. We then prepared a Draft Management Plan for the proposed park and completed an EIR on that Draft Plan. This park was an extremely controversial project as a number of the neighboring landowners were opposed to public access to the area. The City hired us with the understanding that legal challenges to the project were likely. As such, we prepared detailed analyses of golden eagle use of the site, other Special Status animals and plants, geologic hazards, water quality impacts, traffic safety, the potential for crimes, fire hazard, and aesthetics. Our plan included development of cost estimates for trail construction and other infrastructure improvements. Terra LindalSlee, py Hollow Divide Open Space Management Plan LCA prepared a comprehensive Master Plan for managing a 1,500-acre open space preserve jointly owned by the City of San Rafael and the Madn County Open Space District. The plan investigated all areas of management and the impacts resulting from several management options. Particular attention was given to fire management (including a Fire Management Plan), grazing (including a Grazing Management Plan), slope stability, and public access and use. A full cost analysis was prepared for all Plan recommendations. The Plan was adopted and is currently being used to guide land uses and implementation of improvements on the property. Mclnnis Park LCA prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for proposed improvements (including a skateboard park) to an existing park in Madn County. The report was prepared for the Madn County Open Space District. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Sonoma Mountain Regional Park Screeninq We surveyed all properties in the Sonoma Mountain area west of the City of Petaluma to identify potential regional park sites. Sites were assessed and ranked for their suitability for a future regional park. Sandbanks Recreational Vehicle Park This was a focused EIR which was prepared for Sonoma County on a recreational park (campground, recreational vehicle park, and day use) located on the Russian River north of Cloverdale. Major factors were sewage treatment and disposal, traffic and internal circulation, geologic stability, and fire management. Re-design recommendations were made based on geologic findings, traffic, and sewage disposal. Polo Grounds Regional Park LCA was engaged by the County of Santa Cruz to prepare an EIR on a proposed regional park in the Aptos area. We conducted detailed analyses of site biotic impacts, drainage, and slope stability. Particular attention was paid to park impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, including traffic, noise, and visual quality. A full assessment of alternatives was provided. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT LCA prepares environmental analyses of al~ types of mineral development, including aggregate resources, gold mines, quarries, and other mining projects. We also prepare analyses of geothermal and other energy-related projects. Blue Rock Quarry We are currently preparing an EIR on the proposed expansion of a hard rock quarry near Forestville, Sonoma County. This is a very controversial project, and the ER was forced by a legal challenge. The EIR contains a full analysis of impacts to on-site and off-site natural resources Particular emphases are sedimentation impacts, to steelhead and salmon, traffic impacts, diesel particulate impacts on Forestville residents, and noise. A full assessment of cumulative impacts is required due to the proposed expansion of another large quarry across Highway 116. Sheep Ranch Mine This mining proposal was to process the tailings from an old mine; the tailings pile was estimated to contain over twenty million dollars worth of gold. As the tailings pile was in the middle of the small town of Sheep Ranch, the proposal was quite controversial. The EIR was ordered by the Court as the Calaveras County Board of Supervisors had originally approved the project without an EIP,. LCA prepared a complete EIR which withstood the scrutiny of the Court and the public. The report detailed site geology, drainage, dam safety (tailings pond), placement of tailings reclamation, erosion control, biotic resources, air quality, noise, visual quality, public services, and land use. Garcia River Gravel Management Plan We worked as a subcontractor to Philip Williams & Associates in preparing a gravel management plan for the Garda River for the County of Mendocino. We were responsible for determining market area, past and present demand, non-stream aggregate sources, and resource conservation. Upper Russian River Gravel Management Plan We worked as a subcontractor to Philip Williams & Associates in preparing this gravel management plan for the County of Mendocino. We were responsible for determining market area, past and present demand, non-stream aggregate sources, and resource conservation. Santa Fe Geothermal, inc. Use Permit We prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration on a proposal to develop a new geothermal ddll pad and a steam transmission line from that ddll pad to the existing power plant. The new ddll pad is located near the top of Cobb Mountain in Lake County in an area previously not used for geothermal wells. We provided a complete environmental review of the consequences of development of this new well site focusing on effects on plants and animals, views, public safety, and land use. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECTS: GENERAL PLANS LCA prepares General Plans and EIRs on those plans. Some examples of General Plans we have worked on are summarized below. City of Lafayette General Plan LCA prepared the EIR on the new General Plan for the City of Lafayette. This included an assessment of growth potential and the effects of projected growth. We originally prepared an Existing Conditions report. This report was used by other consultants to prepare the Draft General Plan. The EIR focused on development of vacant hillside lands around the edges of the city as well as redevelopment of the city's central business area. Because the City revised its Draft General Plan three times over ten years, we prepared three separate EIRs. The plan was adopted in 2002. We are currently working on a follow-up EIR that investigates increasing density in Iow density hillside areas. City of Novato General Plan We prepared the EF{ for the new Novato General Plan. Because there were numerous controversial projects in the City, the City was quite concerned that the General Plan would be challenged by certain parties challenging the adequacy of the EIR. As such, we prepared a full, detailed EIR that assessed cumulative impacts that would result from buildout of the City and its Sphere of Influence. We also prepared all the background work used to develop the Public Facilities Chapter of the Plan. The EIR was not challenged, and the Plan has been adopted. City of Fort Bragg General Plan LCA prepared the City's Draft General Plan update, including preparation of a new Local Coastal Element. preparing the plan required attendance at numerous workshops, meetings, and hearings. We then prepared the Program EIR for the draft plan. The EIR was certified and the plan adopted in late 2002. The plan and ER particularly focused on land use issues, including future uses of the coastal zone, traffic and circulation, provision of public services, and protection of natural and visual resources.. Cloverdale Housing Element LCA prepared the Negative Declaration for the City of Cloverdale's Update of its Housing Element. Ukiah HousinQ Element -- LCA is currently preparing a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Update of the City of Ukiah's Housing Element. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECT: PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE LCA assesses all types of public service projects, including transportation projects, pipeline projects, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities, water storage and treatment facilities, flood control projects, and storm drain systems. We work with public works departments and special districts to assist these agencies in completing the environmental review process, including preparation of site selection cfiteda, feasibility and nexus studies, initial studies, Negative Declarations, and EIRs. Examples of these types of projects are summarized below. Mendocino County Regional Transportation Plan LCA prepared a Program F_IR for the most recent Mendocino County Regional Transportation Plan. The EIR addressed the growth-inducing and cumulative impacts that could result from a range of Projects including two major bypasses on Highway 101, numerous road improvement projects, new road projects, airport improvement projects, mass transit projects, and bicycle and pedestrian projects. Ukiah Solid Waste Transfer Station LCA prepared a full F. IR on a new solid waste transfer station in the City of Ukiah. This solid waste transfer station will replace the existing City landfill which disposes of waste for the City and the remainder of the Ukiah Valley. The transfer station was sized large enough to potentially transfer ali solid waste from the County of Mendocino. As is the case with all solid waste projects, the project was very controversial. We examined the full range of impacts regarding water quality, aesthetics, odors, traffic, land use compatibility, and other areas of impact. Monte Rio Wastewater Pollution Control Program LCA prepared a full F_iR on a new community wastewater system for the community of Monte Rio on the Russian River in Sonoma County. Due to Federal funding, the project was also an Environmental Assessment under NEPA. The new facility includes a community collection system, a treatment plant, and a community leachfield for disposal. The project was very controversial because the proposed disposal site was a scenic meadow adjacent to the river plus some residents' concerns about growth-inducing impacts. The EIR assessed impacts to water quality, biotic resources, aesthetics, air contamination, and the growth-inducing impacts of lifting a growth moratorium once the project is completed. A full range of alternative means of providing public wastewater services was conducted. Lake County Sanitation District Northwest Facility We prepared an EIR on new facilities proposed for this existing wastewater treatment and disposal plant. This included a geotechnical and environmental analysis of a new storage reservoir, expansion of spray irrigation fields, and additions to the treatment system. We assessed a wide range of disposal alternatives as there wa s insufficient sprayfield area to accommodate long-term disposal requirements. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECT: PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE Olema Water Tank Replacement Project LCA is preparing an Initial Study and appropriate CEQA document for the proposed construction of two new water tanks to serve the community of Olema in Madn County. The tank site is located on Point Reyes National Seashore. Throckmorton Pump Station LCA is preparing an Initial Study and appropriate CEQA document on construction of a new water pumping station in Mill Valley. The client is the Marin Municipal Water District. Marin Terrace Water Tank We prepared a Negative Declaration for a new water tank located on a small parcel of land surrounded by residential development. This project was done for the Madn Municipal Water District. Ammo Hill Water Tank LCA prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for a 4.5 million gallon water tank on a site near Novato for the North Madn Water District. The site was very sensitive due to the presence of wetlands, wildlife habitat, and visual resources. Preparation of the Initial Study included our facilitation of scoping meetings with environmental groups and public agencies. Wilson Way Tank Replacement LCA prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for a new 100,000 gallon water tank that will replace an older 50,000 gallon tank adjacent to the City of Larkspur in Madn County. This Negative Declaration was prepared for the Madn Municipal Water District. Andersen Drive Pipeline We prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for a proposed water transmission line crossing of a creek in San Rafaei. The client was the Marin Municipal Water District. · Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates RECENT PROJECT: PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE Calpella Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements LCA prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration on proposed improvements to the Calpella VVastewater Treatment Plant. This study included assessment of potential growth-inducing impacts that might ~esult from the project. The client was the Calpella County Water District. Calpella County Water District Northwest Annexation LCA prepared a Negative Declaration for a proposed annexation of land to the Calpella County Water District. The properties proposed for annexation were being served through an out-of-area service agreement. The client was the Calpella County Water District. Ukiah Valley Sanitation District We prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the addition of Advanced Wastewater Treatment components and other minor treatment components to an existing facility. Foss Creek Flood Control Master Plan The City of Healdsburg was required to construct a flood retention pond next to Foss Creek to withhold peak flows. LCA assessed a vadety of detention pond and channel designs, including channel improvements downstream of the retention pond. The report focused on the impacts on wildlife and vegetation. Detailed analysis determined the best designs. A full reclamation plan was designed for the retention pond area. In addition, LCA assessed the recreational possibilities of the pond and downstream area. A basic ripadan ordinance for the downstream area was designed. Following the completion of this report, LCA was contracted to supervise the revegetation and reclamation of the retention basin and the basin levee. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Chades and Associates LEONARD CHARLES, Ph.D. Mr. Charles is a professional environmental planner and cultural ecologist with more than twenty-five years of experience in environmental and sociocultural consulting. He is a founding partner of Leonard Chades and Associates. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1977 to Present Project Manager, Leonard Charles and Associates Professional Responsibilities: Project management; analysis of public service infrastructure; land use analysis; refugee affairs analyst; community surveying; assessment of agricultural and land use strategy for resource areas in Northern Califomia; environmental planner; reclamation analysis; and park and recreation analyst. 1986 to 1989 Lecturer in Anthropology and History, Cazadero Academy Professional Responsibilities: Taught courses in anthropology and history. 1977 Lecturer in Anthropology, Sonoma State University Professional Responsibilities: Taught course on the ecology of hunting and gathering societies. 1968 to 1976 Researcher, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley Professional Responsibilities: Conducted research on a variety of subjects and projects including: the cultural ecology of the Philippine Islands; intermediation in the Philippines; social organization in the Gilbert Islands; the ecology of home gardens in Southeast Asia; trade patterns in Malaysia; and the sociology of corruption. 1971 to 1982 Sheeprancher, Charles Ranch, Sonoma County Professional Responsibilities: Operation of a sheep ranch on 800 acres in Northern California. 1969 to 1970 Lecturer in Anthropology and Sociology, Santa Rosa Junior College Professional Responsibilities: Taught introductory courses in cultural anthropology and sociology in the Evening College. EDUCATION · Ph.D. Anthropology, University of California at Berkeley, 1976; (field emphases were cultural ecology, demography, and rural American society). · M.A. and B.A., Anthropology, University of California at Berkeley, 1968 and 1969. · Independent Study in Systematics (ten-month course), International Academy for Continuous Education, Sherbome, England, 1974-75. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Chades and Associates ASSOCIATIONS · Full member of the Society of American Foresters. · Full member of the Amedcan Anthropological Association. · Member of the Town of San Anselmo Open Space Committee, 1994 to present. PUBLICATIONS · Author of over 100 EIRs plus numerous other consulting reports. · Rural Life in Northern California: A Study of Communal Life Patterns, 1976. U.C. Berkeley (Ph.D. Thesis, 550 pp.). · "Simple Poisons," 1980. Upriver/Downriver, No. 2 (article on herbicide use in Mendocino County). "Home on the Range," 1981. First pdnted in Upriver/Downdver, No. 4; reprinted in Rain magazine, 1981; reprinted in City/Country Miner, 1982 (an anthology of Northern California walters), (article on problems of coyotes and sheepranching). · "Observations on the Concept of Place," 1982. Impressions, No. 6 (article on ecological implications of the concept of place). "Where You At?" 1981. CoEvolution Quarterly, No. 32; reprinted in over 90 other magazines and journals. Co-written with Jim Dodge, Victoria Stockley, and Lynn Milliman. Recently described as the most reprinted article on bioregionalism ever written. "Social and Environmental. Issues in Developing Vegetation and Fire Management Plans." 1995. The Biswell Symposium; Fire Issues and Solutions in the Urban Interface and Wild/and Ecosystems, David VVeise and Robert Martin (technical coordinators); Gen. Tech. Report BVV-GTR-158, Albany, CA, 199 pp. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates LYNN MILLIMAN Lynn Milliman is a professional environmental planner and anthropologist. She has twenty five years of experience preparing environmental and planning reports. She is a founding partner of Leonard Charles and Associates. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1977 to Present Project Manager, Leonard Charles and Associates. Professional Responsibilities: Project management; community surveying; environmental assessment; public schools analyst; visual quality analyst; computer mapping, and graphics. 1968 to 1970 1964 to 1966 Researcher, University of California, Berkeley. Professional Responsibilities: Conducted research on a variety of projects including social structure in Vietnam. Computer Programmer, Systems Analyst, and Assistant Manager, Glen Slaughter and Associates, Computer Processing Division, Oakland. Professional Responsibilities: In charge of devising computer programs for numerous projects. As assistant manager oversaw work of computer programmers. EDUCATION · M.A., Anthropology, University of California at Berkeley, 1969 (completed doctoral orals but has not submitted thesis). · B.A., Anthropology, University of California at.Berkeley, 1968. · Two years' graphics training, California College of Arts and Crafts, 1957-58. PUBLICATIONS · "Mono Lake Drainage," 1981. Upriver/Downriver, No. 4 (article on ecology of Mono Lake). "VVhere You At?" 1981. CoEvolution Quarterly, No. 32; reprinted in over 90 other magazines and journals. Co-written with Jim Dodge, Victoria Stockley, and Lynn Milliman. Recently described as the most reprinted article on bioregionalism ever written. Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates NATALIE MACRIS Natalie Macds is an urban and environmental planning consultant who specializes in writing and editing. Her 17 years of experience include work in both the public and private sectors. She has prepared numerous community planning documents, including Environmental Impact Reports, General Plan elements, plan summaries, and background reports. She has also wdtten and edited various planning-related books, brochures, and other publications for general audiences. Clients include planning consulting firms, architecture firms, public agencies, publishing houses, and non- profit organizations. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1991 -present Urban and Environmental Planning Consultant, Writer, and Editor Professional Responsibilities: Serve as a project manager, writer, editor, and researcher for planning projects. Wdte and edit planning-related publications, including plans, reports, books, and brochures. 1987-1990 Associate Planner, Duncan & Jones, Berkeley, California Professional Responsibilities: Prepared Environmental Impact Reports on urban development and planning projects. Revised and updated Housing Elements and other portions of city and county General Plans. 1985-1987 Assistant Planner (December 1986 -April 1987) Planning Technician (June 1985 - December 1986) Department of Planning and Development, City of Fairfield, California Professional Responsibilities: Processed development applications, prepared staff reports for the City's Planning Commission and City Council, and provided public information and assistance. Aug. - Nov. 1990 Assistant Editor, Rainforest Database, Living Earth Foundation, London Spring 1984/ Winter 1985 Abstracts and Alumni News Editor, Berkeley Planning Joumal Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California at Berkeley June - Sept. 1984 Research Assistant, Small Business Assistance Project Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley Volunteer Intern, City and County of San Francisco, Department of City Planning Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates EDUCATION Master of City Planning, University of Califomia at Berkeley, 1985 (ProfessionaI Report: "Artists' LiveNVork Space in San Francisco: Strategies for Preservation and Development") · B.A., History (with Honors and Overall Academic Distinction), University of Califomia at Berkeley, 1983 PUBLICATIONS · Author of numerous EIRs and planning studies. · Planning in Plain English: Writing Tips for Urban and Environmental Planners, 2000. American Planning Association. · A Career Worth Planning: Starting Out and Moving Ahead in the Planning Profession (with Warren W. Jones), 2000. American Planning Association. · How Cities Work (Technical Editor), Ziff-Davis Press. · "improving Our Bay-Delta Estuary'' Guidebook, Association of Bay Area Govemments (ABAG). "Improving Our Bay-Delta Estuary Through Local Plans and Programs, ".(Editor). Statement of Qualifications Leonard Charles and Associates ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN Tel: 707-766-7700 www. Illingworth rodkin, corn ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. //11 Acoust/¢s· Air Oua/ity 11// 505 Peta/urna Boulevard South Petalurna, California 94952 Fax: 707-766-7790 i/Iro@illingworthrodkin, corn ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. FIRM DESCRIPTION Founded in 1987, Illingworth and Rodkin, Inc. (I&R) provides a complete range of consulting services in acoustics, vibration and air quality to governmental agencies, private sector clients and other environmental and design professionals. The firm has completed in excess of 2,800 projects in architectural acoustics, community noise and vibration, industrial noise and vibration control, and air quality studies. The firm emphasizes objective and thorough analyses of issues, timeliness, teamwork, and practical solutions. The firm is experienced with both the State and Federal environmental regulatory processes. Noise Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. specializes in the assessment and control of environmental noise. The firm provides its services directly to governmental agencies and private sector clients and acts as a sub-consultant to other environmental and design professionals. I&R has completed more than 2,000 projects involving environmental noise, transportation noise studies, industrial noise control, and building acoustics. The firm is considered one of the leading consulting firms in the West Coast that provide a full range of testing and design services for the abatement of transportation noise and vibration. ^ large number of transportation noise studies ranging from environmental impact assessments to developing comprehensive mitigation measures for residential, commercial and other types of existing and proposed developments have been conducted. While most of the work is conducted in Northern California, the firm has completed projects throughout California and the western United States. I&R combines a strong theoretical and a thorough empirical approach to noise and vibration studies. The firm has extensive experience with the computer models used for transportation noise assessment and staff has been trained in the use of the latest Traffic Noise Model. The firm recognizes the computer models' strengths and weaknesses, and its Principals have consistently emphasized the importance of being "on the ground" in a study area, becoming thoroughly familiar with the various parameters that would affect the noise environment and one's ability to predict future conditions, and conducting thorough and comprehensive measurements to assist in the analysis. Project-level noise measurements are made at least weekly. The firm makes about 200-300 noise measurements per year. Noise and vibration services include: Environmental Studies - Noise assessments for environmental studies (EIR, ElS, EA) - Noise studies for new residential developments - Community noise control plans and ordinances - Noise Ordinance compliance Transportation Noise - Traffic noise studies and noise barrier design - Tire/Pavement noise measurements - Evaluations of roadways noise (source, passby and wayside measurements) Architectural Acoustics - Designs for interiors - Control of noise transmission between spaces - Isolation from exterior noise - Code compliance Noise Control En.qineerin_q - Designs and specifications for mechanical and electrical equipment - Solutions for existing noise and vibration problems in buildings and industry Computer Modelin~ - Traffic noise using TNM, SOUND32 and LEQV2 - Noise sources using Sound Plan and ENM Field Monitorin~ - Environmental noise and vibration - Sound isolation, impact insulation and reverberation time in buildings - Mechanical and electrical equipment noise and vibration - Noise from industrial plants - Meteorological conditions Air Quality In 1995 I&R was expanded to include air quality and meteorological capabilities. The bulk of the firms' air quality work involves environmental air quality studies that are in support of both private and public projects. Air quality studies for land use projects to support Environmental Impact Reports are most common. Types of projects include specific plans for a variety of land use types, office centers, wastewater treatment facilities, waste management facilities, quarries, and other industrial facilities. The firm also assists local communities in developing air quality policies for incorporation into General Plans. Many projects involve the analysis of air quality impacts from both direct and indirect sources of air pollutants. Indirect sources include transportation facilities, which I&R staff has considerable experience evaluating. Through years of conducting environmental noise and air quality studies for local, state and federal agencies, the firm has developed considerable experience in dealing with both the technical and policy issues. While transportation projects can involve considerable air quality technical aspects, the regulatory challenges can be quite complex. This is especially true in the case with federal projects, where plan conformity issues arise. I& R staff has dealt successfully with these issues on a wide variety of projects ranging from reuse of Defense bases, large new freeway projects to simple urban intersection modifications. Air quality services include: Environmental Studies - Assessments for environmental studies (EIR, IS, ElS, EA) - Transportation projects - New Land Use developments - Control plans and ordinances - Conformity determinations - Peer Review Computer Modelinq - Land use developments using UP, BEMIS - Air Pollutant emissions estimation using EMFAC2002, Mobile, AP-42 - Microscale air quality traffic modeling using CALINE4, CAL3QHC - Stationary air pollution source modeling using EPA-approved models (e.g., SCREEN3 and ISCST) - Analysis of meteorological data Tek 707-766-7700 www. Illingworthrodkin. corn ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. I/liB Acoustics · Air Quality 111/ 505 Petalurna Boulevard South Petalurna, California 94952 Fax: 707-766-7790 illro@illingworthrodkin, corn JAMES A. REYFF Mr. Reyff is a Meteorologist with expertise in the areas of air quality and acoustics. His expertise includes meteorology, air quality emissions estimation, transportation/land use air quality studies, air quality field studies, and environmental noise studies. He is familiar with federal, state and local air quality and noise regulations and has developed effective working relationships with many regulatory agencies. During the past 15 years, Mr. Reyff has prepared Air Quality Technical Reports for over 10 major Caltrans highway projects and conducted over 100 air quality analysis for other land use development projects. These projects included carbon monoxide microscale analyses, the calculation of project emissions (e.g., ozone precursor pollutants, fine particulate matter, and diesel particulate matter), seasonal field monitoring, and preparation of air quality conformity determinations. Mr. Reyff advised and influenced decisions of federal and local air quality agencies regarding impact assessment methodologies and air quality conformity issues. He has conducted air quality evaluations for specific plans and General Plan updates. Recently, he prepared the air quality analysis for the NASA Ames Research Park, which included a Federal SIP Conformity analysis. Mr. Reyff has been responsible for a variety of meteorological and air quality field investigations in support of air permitting and compliance determinations. He has conducted air quality analyses of diesel generators in support of regulatory permitting requirements and environmental compliance issues. Mr. Reyff has designed and implemented meteorological and air quality monitoring programs throughout the Western United States including Alaska. Programs include field investigations to characterize baseline levels of air toxics in rural areas, as well as regulatory air quality and meteorological monitoring. He was involved in a long-term monitoring program at the Port of Oakland that evaluated meteorological conditions and fine particulate matter concentrations in neighborhoods adjacent to the Port. Over 15 major noise technical studies for transportation systems have been conducted by Mr. Reyff. He has managed several research studies for Caltrans including a noise study that evaluated long-range diffraction and reflection of traffic noise from sound walls under different meteorological conditions. Mr. Reyff has also evaluated noise from power plants, quarries and other industrial facilities. In a small community in Idaho, he developed noise criteria acceptable to residences, city officials, and project proponents for a new power plant. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1995-Present Project Scientist 1989-1995 Project Meteorologist 1988-1989 Post Voyage Analyst Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. Petaluma, California Woodward-Clyde Consultants (URS) Oakland, California Oceanroutes (Weather News) Sunnyvale, California EDUCATION 1986 B.S., Major: Geoscience (Meteorology) PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES American Meteorological Society Air & Waste Management Association San Francisco State University Institute of Noise Control Engineering ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. //11 Acoustics · ,Air Oua//ty 11// 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petalurna, California 94952 Tek 707-766-7700 7790 www. Illingworthrodkin. corn illro@ illin gwo rth rodkin, com Fax: 707-766- PAUL R. DONAVAN, Sc.D. Dr. Donavan has extensive experience in noise and vibration measurement and analysis. Much of his work has involved motor vehicle noise including tire/pavement noise evaluation, interior noise control, aerodynamic noise generation, and vehicle passby noise and regulation. Dr. Donavan also has worked in the areas of sound propagation around buildings, architectural acoustics, structure-borne noise analysis, and instrumentation development. Some of his major projects have included quantification of the increase in tire noise under vehicle acceleration, evaluation of test pad pavement properties for tire and passby noise, correlation of wind tunnels in the US and Europe for aeroacoustic testing, field studies of residential building fa~:ades for traffic noise insulation, development of representative light vehicle test procedures, and reduction of wind noise on many of General Motors vehicle lines. Dr. Donavan has written and given more than 15 papers at national and international noise conferences, contributed to four ANSI & SAE standards, and co-authored a chapter in the Handbook of Noise Control. Dr. Donavan has also given short courses/seminars on topics in noise and vibration including acoustics fundamentals, sound intensity, mobility measurement, aerodynamic noise generation, and Statistical Energy Analysis. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2001 - Present Acoustical Consultant Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. Petaluma, California 1979-2001 Staff Engineer General Motors Corporation, Milford, Michigan 1977-1979 Senior Project Engineer National Bureau of Standards Gaithersburg, Maryland 1976-1977 Senior Project Engineer VVyle Laboratories Arlington, Virginia EDUCATION 1976 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctor of Science, Mech. Eng., Major: Acoustics 1973 Massachusetts Institute of Technology M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Major: Acoustics 1971 University of California at Berkeley B.S. Mechanical Engineering PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES Institute of Noise Control Engineers, 2001 President Acoustical Society of America, Member Noise Technical Committee Society of Automotive Engineers, Chair, Noise & Vibration Paper Review Committee !LLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. /~lib Acoustics · Air Quality i111/ 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, Califomia 94952 Tek 707- 766- 7700 7790 www. Iliingworthrodkin. com illro@illingworthrodkin, com Fax: 707- 766- RICHARD B. RODKIN, PE Mr. Rodkin has been responsible for a wide range of studies in environmental noise, architectural acoustics, and noise control engineering. He worked with staff of the California Energy Commission assessing noise impacts of power cogeneration projects, a solar project, and a transmission line. A recent research study for Caltrans investigated long-distance diffraction and reflection of noise from sound walls. In another study, he measured underwater sound levels generated by piledriving in San Francisco Bay. Transportation noise and vibration studies include freeways and light-rail systems in the Bay Area and San Diego, and numerous road widening and improvement projects for cities and counties. Other environmental noise studies include port expansions in the Bay Area and Los Angeles; Clean Fuels projects at Bay Area refineries; aircraft noise; new and expanding mines and quarries; power plants and cogeneration projects; geothermal and on-shore oil fields; noise ordinance violations; commercial, institutional, housing and other miscellaneous development projects; Specific Plans, and Noise Elements of the General Plans. He has acted as an expert witness in cases involving traffic noise, construction noise, and a murder case where audibility was an issue. During the past 31 years Mr. Rodkin has worked continuously in all aspects of acoustical design relating to new buildings including architectural acoustics, sound isolation, and the control of noise and vibration from mechanical equipment. Projects include housing, office buildings, hospitals, university buildings, TV studios and teleconferencing facilities, churches, an airport expansion, hotels, small power plants, and cogeneration facilities. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1987-Present Principal Consultant Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. Petaluma, California 1976-1987 Acoustical Consultant Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc., San Francisco, California 1973-1976 Acoustical Consultant Buonaccorsi & Associates San Francisco, California EDUCATION 1978 University of California at Berkeley M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Major: Acoustics 1973 University of California at Davis B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Major: Power/Propulsion PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION AND SOCIETIES California: Mechanical Engineer No. 23900 (1985) Institute of Noise Control Engineers Acoustical Society of America ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. I/liB Acoustics · Air Quality 111/ 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, California 94952 Tek 707- 766- 7700 7790 www. Illingworthrodkin. com illro@ illin gwo rth rodkin, com Fax: 707-766- MICHAEL S. THILL Mr. Thill is a noise specialist with six years of professional experience. Mr. Thill's expertise lies in conducting field research, analyzing data, and noise modeling. He has conducted numerous field surveys in a variety of noise environments and has authored technical noise reports for residential projects, mixed-use projects, commercial projects, transportation projects, educational facilities, redevelopment projects, and office and industrial developments. Mr. Thill has led traffic noise investigations for major transportation projects including the Route 4 Bypass project and the 1-680/Route 4 Interchange project in Contra Costa County, California. Mr. Thill is proficient with use of FHWA's traffic noise prediction model (TNM), and is familiar with the procedures for preparing highway noise impact studies presented in Caltran's Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol and the Technical Noise Supplement (TENS). He received a BS degree in Environmental Science from the University of California at Santa Barbara. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1998 - Present Staff Consultant 1996 - 1998 Planning Intern EDUCATION 1998 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. Petaluma, California City of Carpinteria Carpinteria, California University of California at Santa Barbara B.S., Major: Environmental Science CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS The Crane Transportation Group (CTG), formerly the Goodrich Traffic Group, provides advanced skills in traffic and transportation planning and engineering for the public and private sector. For every study undertaken, our principals provide the expertise of either a registered traffic and civil engineer or a senior transportation planner, obtained through twenty years of professional experience. This allows CTG to provide a comprehensive approach to all facets of transportation planning and engineering. Throughout each study, our principal-in-charge maintains.primary involvement, rather than delegating the majority of ~vork to junior staff members, thereby achieving a consistently superior work product. This approach has been maintained for our 18 years in business, during which more than 600 projects in over 150 California cities and counties and in the western United States have been completed. Crane Transportation Group's extensive background in preparation of traffic studies required by local jurisdictions on behalf of both public and private clients enables the principal-in-charge to provide expert presentations in meetings and hearings. In addition, we have a thorough background in addressing the technical requirements of the permit process, as well as the sensitivities of the concerned community. Our continued long term business relationships attest to our skills in analysis, presentation and responsiveness to client needs. The broad range of studies undertaken by the Crane Transportation Group includes traffic network modeling for cities and counties, working with newly developed Congestion Management Plans, general plan and specific plan circulation elements, EIR circulation sections, impact studies for industrial and commercial areas, housing developments, resorts, hotels, and a wide range of special purpose facilities, as well as parking and transit studies. In summary, the goals of the Crane Transportation Group are threefold: to enthusiastically work with our clients and share our years of expertise, to provide a cost- effective work product, and produce expert technical analyses in a highly readable and usable format. MARK D'. CRANE, P.E., Registered Traffic and Civil Engineer Pr/nc/pa/ Experience Mr. Crane is Principal-in-Charge of Crane Transportation Group operations. He is a registered Traffic Engineer and a registered Civil Engineer in California with over twenty years of experience in traffic engineering and planning at: Crane Transportation Group, San Francisco; Goodrich Traffic Group, San Francisco; JHK & Associates, San Francisco; Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Los Angeles; and Simpson & Curt/n, Philadelphia. He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Mr. Crane has managed over 600 transportation studies throughout California and the western United States. He is thoroughly familiar with all aspects of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for traffic analysis, as well as general plan and specific plan traffic analysis. During his career Mr. Crane has successfully worked directly with jurisdictional staff, private developers and environmental planning firms. A partial list of relevant projects includes: General Plan Circulation Elements/General Plan Traffic Projections/General Plan EIRs: Lathrop, Cotati, Grass Valley, Brentwood, Rohnert Park, Gonzales, Sonoma (1985, 1994) and San Luis Obispo, California; Specific Plan Circulation Elements for major residential, employment, commercial, recreational, amusement park and medical projects in Antioch, Brentwood, Manteca, West Sacramento, Lathrop, Grass Valley, Dixon, Suison City, Napa, Petaluma, Richmond, and Palo Alto, California; Planning Impact Studies and EIR Circulation Elements for: regional shopping centers, conference centers, retail/commercial centers, 3 to 20,000 unit housing developments, outlet malls, schools, churches, industrial developments, movie studios, restaurants, wineries, marinas, banks, offices, resorts, hotels, hospitals, medical offices, recreation areas, senior citizen/congregate care developments, religious facilities, and trucking terminals; University/School Circulation Studies: St. Mary's College Master Plan Circulation/Parking Study--Moraga, U.C. San Francisco Parking Study, College of Marin Expansion Parking Study, San Ramon Middle School, Richmond School District High School; Parks/Recreation Areas Studies: Spanish Bay Resort--Monterey, Rancho San Antonio Park Master Plan--Santa Clara County, Fitzgerald Marine Reserve Expansion--San Mateo County, Richmond Waterfront Park, Polo Fields Park--Santa Cruz County, Island Park Athletic Fields-Belmont, Burton Field--San Carlos; CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE PUBLIC FACILITIF_~ Sonoma County Transit Center Expansion Brisbane Civic Center Stanislaus County Public Safety Center Stanislaus County Social Services Facility Nevada County Administrative Center Relocation Lake County Public Safety Center Matin County Jail Expansion Sonoma County Jail Expansion San Francisco Hall of Justice Expansion Humbolt County Public Safety Center State Archives Building Rehabilitation - Sacramento New Governor's Mansion - Sacramento Rancho Cordoba Cable TV System Installation Grass Valley Post Office Relocation Clovis Post Office Relocation Sausalito Post Office Relocation Concord Pavilion New Post Office - Saratoga Santa Rosa Transit Transfer Facility Fresno County Minimum Security Facility Expansion CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS San Francisco Clean Water Program Bayview/Hunters Point Facilities Construction Sea Cliff Facilities Construction Naval Facilities Closures - Northern CaLifornia River Street Widening - City of Santa Cruz Windsor Central District Road Reconstruction - Sonoma County Blue Rock Road Improvements - Antioch Arnold Drive Improvements - Sonoma County Sermmonte Boulevard Extension - Daly City Deerfield Drive Bypass - Truckee El Camino Widening - Sacramento Bancroft Road Widening - Walnut Creek Oak Road Widening - Walnut Creek Railroad Avenue Grade Separation - Pittsburg Dos Osos Sewer Line Construction - Orinda A Street Widening - Hayward A Street Extension - Antioch Viem Ranch Road -Antioch CHARLES PATTERSON Plant Ecologist. Wetland Specialist Resource Manager. Naturalist Charles A. Patterson 1806 Ivanhoe Avenue Lafayette, CA 94549 Pta: (510) 938 - 5263 ('wetland') FAX: (510) 938 - 7723 Mobile: (510) 414 - 7976 EDUCATION Master of Science, Range Management and Wildland Ecology, 1974, University of California at Davis Bachelor of Science, Renewable Natural Resources, 1972, U.C. Davis Undergraduate coursework (2 years) in Mechanical Engineering, 1968-1970, U.C. Santa Barbara American Graduate University, trained in Proposal Preparation and Source Selection, 1980 Wetland Identification and Delineation, Unified Federal Method, 1989, Wetland Training Institute 1984-1997: 1977-1.984: 1974-1976: 1973-1974: 1981-1985: 1971-1991: WORK HISTORY Self-employed Consulting Ecologist. Conducted or participated in over 500 environmental projects and studies, from biological and environmental assessments and EIRs, to wetland delineations, sensitive species surveys, mitigation, revegetation, and habitat restoration plans. Numerous specialized botanical and wetland related studies. Congressional appointee to the Sonoma County Vernal Pool Task Force Western Ecological Services Company (WESCO), Matin County. Associate and Senior Plant Ecologist. Directed vegetation and wetland studies for over 100 projects, prepared technical and cost proposals for both botanical and interdisciplinary studies, hired and supervised botanical subcontractors, project management, technical The Nature Conservancy, Western Regional Office. San Francisco. Reseaxch Ecologist on special contract. Pretnn~ vegetation invento~es for 10 nature preserves in California and Washington, hired and supervised interdis<riplinary study teams for preparation of inventories and master plans for 15 nature preserves, completed exhaustive natural resources study of Santa Cruz Island, evaluated potential site acquisitiom for biotic significance. U.S. Forest Service, Riverside Fire Lab. Graduate Research Assistant. Conducted study of the effectiveness of Angora goats in utilizing resprouting chaparral shn~s for possible use in fuel break establishment and maintenance. ECHO - The Wilderness Company, Oakland. Professional Whitewater Ri'~ Guide. Part time whitewater guide and naturalist in California, Oregon, Idaho. Northern California Volleyball Officials Association (NCVOA). Worked part time as a professional volleyball referee; covered collegiate and professional leo_gues throughout northern California. PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco California Coastal Conservancy Calif. Dept. of Fish and Game U.S. Forest Service (Inyo, Toyabe, Stanislaus) U.S. National Park Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Indian Affairs Calif. Division of Mines and Geology Calif. Public Utilities Commission Sonoma County Dept. of Public Works Sonoma County. Water Agency Sonoma County. Ag. Preservation and Open Space Dist. Sonoma County Airport Counties of Marin, San Mateo, Yolo Cities of San Rafael, Roseville, Davis, Vista, Cloverdale, Lafayette~ ATandT Pacific Gas and Elec~c Company Browning-Ferris Industries East Bay Municipal Utility District Matin Municipal Wa__~ter District Sacramento Municipal Utility District Chevron Land Company Shell Oil co~y EDAW, San Francisco Dames and Moore, Phoenix LSA Associates, Point Richmond Wagstaff, and Associates, Berkeley QUF, STA F_,ugineers, Point Richmond ECOS, Sacramento Wetlands Research Associates ENTRIX, Walnut Creek Plaaaing C, on~p~ N~va~ City CAPABILITIES AND WORK EXPERIENCE C. Patterson, pg. 2 Plant Taxonomy: Firsthand experience with the flora of most western states, including California, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and Idaho. Working knowledge of the numerous special floras such as Howell (Matin County), Munz and Keck, Abrams, Hitchcock, and the new Jepson Manual for California. Vegetation Mapping: Complete capabilities with respect to plant community and habitat mapping, utilization of topographic maps and air photos, stereoscope interpretation, soil-veg correlation, range sites, wetland delineation, wildlife habitats, community descriptions, and ground surveys. Have mapped the vegetation of the Desolation and Mokelumne Wilderness areas, Matin Municipal Water District (20,000 acres), riparian vegetation of the Sacramento fiver (Redding to Verona), numerous private ranches, and vernal pool/wetland mosaics in Merced County, City of Roseville sphere of influence, and Sonoma County (including the Santa Rosa Plain). Quantitative Sampling: Community documentation using transect, quadrat, and permanent plot methods. Timber and range site (productivity) determinations, range condition and forage production estimates. Wetland data collection, vegetation monitoring, and sensitive species population monitoring. Rare and Endangered Species: Literature and herbaria searches, record and historic mapping research, detai~ed field surveys, expert and agency coordination, management and recovery plans, habitat suitability determinations, rare plant mitigation plans, sensitive species revegetation, and preserve design. Firsthand experience with over 250 of California's rare and endangered plant taxa, familiarity with many of the state's centers of endemism (Mt. Tamalpais, Klamath Mountains, The Geysers, Monterey Peninsula, Central Valley and Sonoma County vernal pool ecosystem, Mt. Hamiltom Mt. Diablo, etc.). Frequent contributor to the California Native Plant Society and Natural Diversity Data Base files; expert reviewer of proposed state listings and status reports. Wetlands: Wetland delineation and mapping, full c.~ordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. habitat evaluations, wetland management :.. ,d restoration. Exp--:':ence with salt and freshwater wetlands, coastal and estuar/ne, r/parian and iioodplW.,'~.:, wet me:~ '~'s, alpine meadows, bogs and hot springs, vernal pools and other seasonal wetlanas, ephemera, and perennial stream systems. Have completed over 200 wetland delineations and surveys on the Santa Rosa Plain, with numerous others throughout the state. Have worked closely with the Corps of Engineers, San Francisco and Sacramento districts. Preparation of wetiand fill (Section 404) permit applications, including Pre-Discharge Notification, Nationwide Permits, and Individual Permits. Wetland mitigation ~..nd monitoring plans. Revegetation and Restoration: Basic revege:.. ~:ion planning and implementation, site eva!uations and revegetation design, planting specifications, sensitive species propagation and r~lanting, range improvement, restoration, and conversion, specialty consignment growing, native grasses (growing and planting), wildlife habitat enhancement through revegetation, riparian re:.~toration. Fire Ecology: Basic wildfire hazard assessment, botanical input for fire management plans, conceptual burning plans for habitat enhancement and fuel reduction. Environmental Regulations: Interpretation and coordination with state and federal environmental regulations, CEQA, NEPA, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, EIR and EIS requirements, FERC and Corps of Engineers (404) permits, coordination with city and county general plans and policies. Have participated on the Sonoma County Vernal Pool Task Force (an interagency wetlands task group) for five years. Other: Considerable experience with energy siting and development facilities (power plants and access roads, smam lines, large transmission tine projects), small hydroelectric projects (over 40 impact assessments and mitigation plans), rare plant photography and propagation, urban landscaping with native plants. REFERENCES Robert F. Holland, PhD. Vernal p,~'.. :,pert and consulting ecologist (previously on staff at the Calif. Natural Diversity Data Base) Auburn (916) 888 - 9180 Jeffrey Peters. Soil Scientist, QLrESTA Engineers, 1220 Brickyard Cove Road, Point Richmond, CA 94807 (510) 236 - 6114 Ti ~'r'~ Mayer. l?.nvironmental Specialist, Sonoma County Dept. of Public Works, 2550 Ventura Ave., Santa Rosa, CA (707) 527- 3612 John Wagstaff. Wagstaff and Associates, 2512 Ninth St, g5, Berkeley, CA 94707 (510) 540- 0303 Dan Mattel. Wetland Specialist, U.S. Army Corps of Engineer~, Regulatory Branch, 333 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 977 - 8435 PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ORCHARD AVENUE EXTENSION ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ANALYSIS Submitted to: City of Ukiah Planning and Community Development Department 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 September 28, 2005 ATTACHMENT. Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route AnalySis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P~ssoclat®s, Inc. ENGINEER~, GEOLOGISTS & [] ~ONMENTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. IDENTIFICATION OF CONSULTANT .............................................................. 2.1 PADRE ASSOCIATES, INC .................................................................. 2.1.1 Firm History ............................................................................... 2.'1.2 Core Compentencies ................................................................. 2.1.3 Contact Information ................................................................... WORK PLAN ..................................................................................................... 3.1 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT ............. ; ................................. 3.1.1 Project Location ......................................................................... 3.1.2 Project Alternative Description ............ ~ ..................................... 3.2 GENERAL APPROACH ........................................................................ 3.2.1 SEIR Structure ........................................................................... 3.2.2 Project Team ............................................................................. 3.3 PROJECT TASKS ...................... : .......................................................... 3.3.1 Phase 1 - Objective Environmental Analysis. ........................... 3.3.2 Phase 2- SEIR Preparation ..................................................... PROJECT EXPERIENCE ................................................................................. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL ............................................... 5.1 PADRE ASSOCIATES CEQA TEAM MANAGEMENT ......................... 5.1.1 Principal/Project Manager/Staff ................................................. 5.1.2 Administrative ............................................................................ 5.1.3 Project Management Methodology ............................................ 5.2 PROJECT MONITORING AND CONTROLLING .................................. 5.2.1 Accounting System .................................................................... 5.2.2 Quality Assurance Plan ............................................................. 5.2.3 Project Files ............................................................................... 5.3 PROJECT COMMUNICATIONS ........................................................... 5.3.1 Issues Resolution ...................................................................... 5.3.2 Change Management Process .................................................. 5.4 CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................... SCHEDULE AND BUDGET .............................................................................. 6.1 SCHEDULE ................................................................................. : ......... 6.2 BUDGET ............................................................................................... Page 1-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-2 2-4 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-2 3-2 3-3 3-3 3-4 3-9 4-1 5-1 5-1 5-1 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-5 5-6 5-6 5-6 6-1 6-1 6-2 -i- Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Altemative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 & ENVIRONMENTAL BCIENTIGTG TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 7.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................. Page 7-1 TABLES 6-1. Project Schedule ................................................................................................... 6-2. Budget Estimate ................................................................................................... 6-1 6-3 APPENDIX APPENDIX A- FEE SCHEDULE APPENDIX B - RESUMES APPENDIX C - INSURANCE CERTIFICATES -ii- Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ENGINEER8, GEOLOGIETE A [] ENVIRONMENTAL ~u~i~rr~T~ 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre), in association with Crane Transportation Group (Crane), is pleased to submit this proposal in response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the City of Ukiah (City). As stated in the RFP, the City has requested proposals for an objective environmental analysis of the alternative location of the proposed bridge over Orr Creek and any associated relocation of Orchard Avenue both south and north of Orr Creek. If, based on this analysis, the alternative is deemed to: (1) be within the range of reasonable alternatives which would feasibly attain most of the project objectives and would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project; and (2) if the relocation satisfies these criteria, an environmental document will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This proposal has been prepared in direct response to the requirements listed in the RFP. Included below is a summary of our understanding of the project, key issues, the Padre Team, and approach. Padre Team The Padre Team, which is comprised of Padre and Crane, is a blending of experienced professionals with a strong commitment to establishing and maintaining positive client relationships and a dedication to the preparation of quality work products to specifications, which are within budget and on schedule. The Padre Team is experienced with the CEQA process, the applicable policy and planning principles, and the technical methodologies for the specific analyses required for this project. Our wide range of expertise and experience affords the Padre Team the ability to fully address the land use planning, socio-cultural, and biological issues related to the proposed project in a manner that is accurate, thorough, legally defensible, and fully adequate under the CEQA requirements of the City and State of California. Because of our responsive approach, dedication to the preparation of quality work products, strong project management skills, diverse technical capabilities, and experience, and acute knowledge of the local resources, we are confident that the Padre Team is highly qualified to assist City staff with this project. The Padre Team will be headquartered in our Sacramento office, but may also be supported with staff and resources from various offices. Primary tasks included in this statement of work are as follows: · Conduct a background documentation review; · Conduct an objective analysis of the alterative location of the bridge and any associated relocation of Orchard Avenue both south and north of Orr Creek; · Develop findings as to whether the alternative is both within the range of reasonable alternatives which would feasibly attain most of the project objectives and would avoid or substantially lessen of the significant effects of the project; · Conduct working session with City to present findings and obtain direction to either discard alternative (conclude project) or proceed with preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR); Page 1-1 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre ENGINEERG, GEOLOGISTS · [] ENVIRONMENTAL ~CIENT~T~ · If proceed further, prepare an Administrative Draft SEIR, including a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); , · Prepare and circulate the Draft SEIR; · Prepare an Administrative Final SEIR, including responses to comments; · Prepare, duplicate, and circulate the Final SEIR; · Prepare CEQA Findings, and, if necessary, a Statement of Overriding Considerations; · Attend a kick-off meeting, work group session, public hearings, an additional meeting and participate in a post-project evaluation; and, · As an optional task, perform field monitoring to ensure compliance with requirements of the MMRP and preparation of a draft and final report. We have made every effort to keep this proposal brief, concise and responsive to the RFP. Specific elements of the proposal include: · Company profiles - Section 2.0; · A description of our method and scope to accomplish this work - Section 3.0; · The team's experience and technical competence - Section 4.0; · Project Organization and Key Personnel - Section 5.0; · Proposed Cost Estimates and Schedule - Section 6.0; and, · References - Section 7.0. Project Understanding The Orchard Avenue Extension project involves extending Orchard Avenue from Ford Street to Brush Street; constructing a bridge on Orchard Avenue over Orr Creek; constructing access improvements from the south side of the new bridge to City-owned property on the south side of Orr Creek; constructing a new waterline across the bridge; replacing existing water lines along Brush Street; and constructing a storm drainage system south of Brush Street with an outfall to Orr Creek. The City recently certified an EIR for this project; however, a lawsuit was subsequently filed challenging that EIR by considering whether an alternative site for the bridge represents a reasonable and feasible project alternative, and if so, to analyze that project alternative under the standards required by CEQA, including CEQA Guidelines 15126.6. There are a number of key issues with this project, including biological, noise, and traffic impacts, and the feasibility of the proposed alternative that either avoids or minimize impacts will while meeting project objectives. Project Approach Padre is proposing to use a two-phase, front-end loading approach to complete the required tasks. The first phase of the work program will focus on completion of an objective analysis of the alterative location of the bridge and any associated relocation of Orchard Avenue both south and north of Orr Creek. Based on this information, a work-group session will be conducted to present the findings of this analysis and recommendations as to whether this is a reasonable alternative that warrants further consideration under CEQA. The Padre Team will then receive direction whether to prepare a SEIR to analyze this alternative pursuant to CEQA. Page 1-2 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre Pa;soclateB, Ino. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & The second phase of the work program includes the actual preparation of the SEIR for the project, including all required public review periods. This will provide the City with a fully adequate and legally defensible CEQA document that allows the timely construction of project components. The SEIR will contain both analyses of potential impacts associated with the' proposed project and the project alternative. -Two types of mitigation measures will be recommended: (1) measures addressing impacts related to the primary impacts, and (2) measures addressing impacts related to the secondary impacts associated with the proposed project. Such an approach has been used successfully by Padre on other project CEQA documentation. A detailed discussion of this proposed approach is provided in Section 3.0 of this proposal. Page 1-3 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P!soclat®~ Inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVI~P.~E,.'~'AL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 1-4 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS [] ENVIRONMENTAL 2.0 IDENTIFICATION OF CONSULTANT 2.1 PADRE ASSOCIATES, INC. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) is a California-certified small business (No. 0025798) multidisciplinary consulting firm with complementary service lines in environmental planning and sciences, geoenvironmental services, water resources, and geotechnical/civil engineering that provides cost-effective consulting and contracting services that meet or exceed our clients' requirements. Our personnel include Environmental Planners, Environmental Scientists, Biologists, Registered Civil Engineers, .Registered Geologists, Certified Engineering Geologists, a Certified Hydrogeologist, a Certified Environmental Manager, Registered Environmental Assessors, Certified Ecologists, and planners, who have extensive training and hands-on experience in their fields of specialty. Additionally, Padre holds a State of California Contractors License, General Engineering A. Padre is headquartered in Ventura, and has additional offices located in San Luis Obispo, Bakersfield, Goleta, Sacramento, and San Leandro. Senior staff and professional staff live close to each of our offices in which they work, which enables Padre staff to meet with client staff in a short notice. Padre is in good standing with the Secretary of State and has never filed for bankruptcy. 2.1.1 Firm History Padre was established formed in late 1996 by four senior professionals with previous extensive experience with another consulting firm with offices in Santa Barbara, Ventura, and throughout California. Padre Principals are committed to the development of a multi-service, mid-sized consulting firm focused on local and regional projects. Although Padre has been in business for approximately 8 years, the principals and key staff of Padre each have more than 17 years of local professional experience, and a minimum of 12 years working together. The four Principals and the employees of Padre have extensive training and hands-on experience in their specialties. At Padre our goal is to provide our clients with high-quality, timely, and cost-effective consulting and contracting services that exceed our clients' requirements. To achieve this goal, Padre is committed to providing customized services to our clients to match their needs. Padre was founded upon the principle of providing "end-point" driven services where successful project completion' and client satisfaction are paramount. We value our professional relationships with our clients, and depend upon providing continued services to our clients to ensure the future success of Padre. Padre understands that the County expects high quality work from its consultants. Commitment to quality and service is at the heart of our business philosophy. As a smaller firm, we must be concerned with the quality of our work to ensure the continuation of our operation. We practice a service-oriented approach that provides our clients with cost-effective solutions to environmental engineering and environmental compliance projects. Satisfied clients are our best testament to our commitment to quality. We encourage our clients to contact the references identified in association with each project profile provided in this Statement of Qualifications. Page 2-1 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre ENGINEER~, GEOLOGI~T~ [] ENVIRONMENTAL 2.1.2 Core Competencies Padre provides balanced, cost-effective, and unique solutions through a blending of complementary technical service areas and capabilities that are tied' together through sound policy, planning, and project management principles, as depicted below: Environmental Planning/Sciences CEQNNEPA Documentation Compliance Monitoring & Reporting Natural Resources Consulting Regulatory Compliance Sensitive Species Compliance Wetland Regulatory Services Local Planning Coastal Facility Permitting Geoenvironmental Services Phase I & II Site Assessments Complete Site Characterization Feasibility Study Reports Corrective Action Plans Underground Storage Tank Risk Mgmt Soil & Groundwater Remediation Risk-based Corrective Action Geotechnical/Civil Engineering Construction Monitoring Construction Management Construction and Materials Testing Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geological Services for Design Construction and Review Water Resources Conjunctive Use Groundwater Banking Water Transfers Planning, Design, and Construction Hydrologic Modeling Padre contends that the following points set us apart from our peers: Key staff. Key staff have a proven track record of successfully completing projects. Such staff are locally-based and have a history of positive working relationships with clients throughout their careers. Pool of Resources. Padre has an extensive pool of qualified professionals offering a wide range of expertise who collaborate internally and are quickly accessible for agile team management and service delivery. Proven Manaqement Approach. Padre utilizes a proven management approach tailored to the client's needs, ensuring quality and timely response and completion of task requests. Continuous feedback loops are utilized to afford internal training of team members. A single point of contact is maintained with client staff to ensure continuity and consistency of project communications. Commitment to our Clients. Meeting our clients' needs regarding quality, costs and timing, as well as ensuring environmental and regulatory compliance is paramount. Padre manages assessment programs with an "end-point" driven approach, where project completion and client satisfaction are an integral part of our goal to provide clients with total solutions to their projects. Involvement of Senior Staff. Experienced senior staff members are actively involved in daily project work and are readily available to address project related issues. These senior staff generally has 15 to 23 years of applied experience in their field of specialty. Providing Customized Services. As a growing small firm, we have the flexibility to customize our services to match client requirements. Our involvement can range from complete Page 2-2 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre R~.o¢late~, Inc. ENGINEEFI$, GEOLOGISTS · management of a complex, multi-disciplined project, to assisting with limited aspects of a client- led project. Strong Relationships with Governmental and Regulatory A.qencies. Padre's staff have strong, well-developed working relationships with local, regional, state, and federal regulatory agencies. Our staff's reputation for quality performance and knowledge of continually changing regulatory requirements enhances our ability to assist in regulatory negotiations on behalf of our clients. Offices. Padre has offices located in San Luis Obispo, Bakersfield, Goleta, Ventura, Sacramento, and San Leandro. Currently our offices are staffed with nineteen professionals; to meet specific client needs, we supplement our staff with a diverse and experienced cadre of support staff and subcontractors. The addresses and phone and fax numbers for our offices are presented below, and all offices have electronic mail (e-mail) capacity. To obtain an e-mail directory, please call any of the following offices: Padre Associates, Inc. 2052 Edison Avenue San Leandro, CA 94578 Telephone: (510) 636-0804 Fax: (510) 636-0804 Padre Associates, Inc. 811 El Capitan Way, Ste 130 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Telephone: (805) 786-2650 Fax: (805) 786-2651 Padre Associates, Inc. 3020 Explorer Drive, Ste 5 Sacramento, CA 95827 Telephone: (916) 857-1601 Fax: (916) 857-1602 Padre Associates, Inc. 5000 California Ave, Ste 203 Bakersfield, CA 93309 Telephone: (661) 634-9825 Fax: (66.1) 634-9867 Padre Associates, Inc. 5951 Encina Ave, Ste 110 Goleta, CA 93117 Telephone: (805)683-1233 Fax: (805) 683-3944 Padre Associates, Inc. 1861 Knoll Drive Ventura, CA 93003 Telephone: (805) 644-2220 Fax: (805) 644-2050 Page 2-3 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P~;~ocllltes, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOCIIST8 · [] L'NY1RO~__'~'~_ AL SCI~.NTI8~8 2.1.3 Contact Information Simon Poulter Manager, Environmental Sciences Group 5951 Encina Road, Suite 110 Goleta, CA 93117 Telephone: (805) 683-1233, ext. 4 Facsimile: (805) 683-3944 Page 2-4 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P;soclates, Inc. ENGINEER~, GEOLO(IIST8 & 3.0 WORK PLAN 3.1 The Padre UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT Team understands that the Orchard Avenue Extension project involves: Extending Orchard Avenue from Ford Street to Brush Street; · Constructing a bridge on Orchard Avenue over Orr Creek; · Constructing access improvements from the south side of the new bridge to City- owned property on the south side of Orr Creek; Constructing a new waterline across the bridge; Replacing existing water lines along Brush Street; Constructing a storm drainage system south of Brush Street with an outfall to Orr Creek; and, · Constructing a 130-foot retaining wall along a portion of the west side of the Orchard Avenue Extension. Padre also understands that the City recently certified an EIR for this project; however, a lawsuit was subsequently filed challenging that EIR by considering whether an alternative site for the bridge represents a reasonable and feasible project alternative, and if so, to analyze that project alternative under the standards required by CEQA, including CEQA Guidelines 15126.6. Finally, Padre understands that the City is seeking a qualified consultant to conduct an objective environmental analysis of the alternative location of the bridge and any associated relocation of Orchard Avenue both south and north of Orr Creek. If, based on this analysis, the alternative is deemed to: (1) be within the range of reasonable alternatives which would feasibly attain most of the project objectives and would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project; and (2) if the relocation satisfies these criteria, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The SEIR will consider noise, traffic, and biological impacts of the project and the project alternative, as well as the relative physical impacts of both the project and the project alternative on existing and proposed future land uses that would be affected by the proposed project or project alternative. 3.1.1 Project Location The project site is located on the west side of Highway 101, north of Orr Creek, east of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, and south of the undercrossing of the railroad and Ford Road beneath Highway 101. 3.1.2 Project Alternative Description At the existing intersection of Orchard Avenue and Ford Street, Orchard Avenue would veer to the east across private property at a 90-degree angle and extend to Highway 101, where it would then extend northly at another 90-degree angle. It would extend north paralleling the Page 3-1 Proposal for Professional Services Omhard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre F~m 48soclatos, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 & [] ENVIRONMENTAL $CIENTIBT9 highway, functioning as a frontage road. A new bridge would be constructed over Orr Creek in close proximity to the existing Highway 101 Bridge. From there, Orchard Avenue would extend north and connect to Brush Street. The width of the Orchard Avenue right-of-way and bridge would not change with the alternative route. The Ukiah General Plan designates the Orchard Avenue road extension as a Major Arterial Street. 3.2 GENERAL APPROACH The Padre Team understands and will comply with the requirements identified in the RFP pertaining to the environmental analysis, content, methodology and format, and attendance at meetings and hearings. The following text expands on our understanding of the issues related to the project and provides an overview of our approach. 3.2.1 SEIR Structure If required, the environmental document will include a description of the proposed project and alternatives, setting information, an evaluation of short-term construction-related impacts, operational impacts, provision of mitigation measures as needed, and other sections pursuant to CEQA. The project will be assessed and described in four subsections: 1) Introduction; 2) Environmental Setting; 3) Impacts and Mitigation Measures; and 4) Cumulative. Impacts. The "Introduction" subsection will present information regarding the issue area discussion. The "Environmental Setting" subsection will describe the existing environmental and regulatory structure affecting the project area. The "Impacts and Mitigation Measures" subsection will evaluate the impacts of the proposed project and propose feasible mitigation measures to lessen or eliminate those impacts. In addition, mitigation measures will be proposed to lessen secondary impacts associated with the proposed project. Residual impacts of the recommended mitigation measures will also be discussed in this section. The "Cumulative Impacts" subsection will discuss the combined impacts of the proposed project in conjunction with other projects proposed in the vicinity. Impacts. Short-term and long-term impacts (and indirect and secondary impacts) will be analyzed for the proposed project. Each impact statement will be classified as to the level of significance, based on significance thresholds and the availability of measures to feasibly mitigate project effects. Impact categories will include: · Class I. Significant unavoidable adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated. A Class I impact is one for which a solution has not been formulated, either because of the limits of technical and/or scientific knowledge, or infeasibility from a technical, economic, and/or political perspective. Under CEQA, a Class I impact would require a "finding of overriding consideration" by the City to approve the project. · Class I1. Adverse environmental impacts that can be mitigated to less than significant levels. Measures have been identified that can feasibly be implemented and will avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; or compensate for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. Page 3-2 Proposal for Professional SerVices Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P;lloclatell, ino. ENGINEERS, GIEOLOGI8T6 & Class III. Adverse environmental impacts that are/ess than significant or have no identified impact. These impacts, while adverse, are not of a sufficient magnitude, intensity, or duration to disrupt the environment, and have no serious consequences. ,As a result, no mitigation is required. · Class IV. Beneficial impacts benefit or improve the environment and no mitigation is required. Mitigation. Mitigation measures will be described in detail and will be specific to the project. Impacts will be assessed and mitigation measures applied with specificity relative to the level of detail available. Cumulative Impacts. The EIR will address all cumulative impacts within each area of the analysis. 3.2.2 Project Team Our EIR team (Padre Team) is comprised of technical experts that have worked together successfully over numerous years on a variety of projects. Mr. Simon Poulter (Padre) will be the Principal-in-Charge and Mr. Kris Vardas (Padre) will serve as the Project Manager for the EIR effort. As part of the EIR team, Crane Transportation Group (Crane) will review traffic and circulation impacts. The Project Manager will be responsible for primary contact with the City and will coordinate the team member efforts as described further in Section 5.0. The Padre Team realizes that close communications will be the key for the smooth and successful completion of the environmental review and are committed to working cooperatively with all parties concerned. 3.3 PROJECT TASKS Phase 1 - Phase 2- The Padre Team understands and will successfully execute the requirements outlined in the RFP pertaining to the preparation of an objective environmental analysis for the proposed alternative. The Padre Team will ensure the highest degree of quality in preparing and completing the project deliverables. Padre is proposing a two-phased approach to completing this project. The phases and associated key tasks include: Objective Environmental Analysis Description of Project Alternative Baseline Review Environmental Analysis Findings and Recommendations Determination whether to Proceed to Phase 2 SEIR Preparation · Administrative Draft/Screen Check SEIR · DraftSEIR · Response to Comments, including coordination with agencies · Administration Final SEIR · FinalSEIR · Findings/Statement of Overriding Considerations (if applicable) Page 3-3 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P;soclates, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 & [] ENYIRONMENTAL Preparation of each deliverable is considered to be a task within the scope of services to be provided to the City, as is attendance at meetings, hearings, and coordination with the parties involved. 3.3.1 Phase 1 - Objective Environmental Analysis The Project Manager will participate in a kickoff meeting with City staff and other parties involved in the project. If necessary, key technical members will also participate in the meeting. The kickoff meeting will provide an opportunity to review the City's requirements, confirm details of our approach to completing all necessary tasks, and review scheduled milestones. An important function of this meeting will be to finalize an understanding of the scope of the environmental analysis. Task 1.1 - Prepare Description of Project Alternative Following the project kick-off meeting, the team will prepare a project description of the project alternative based on available City documentation. This description will provide the initial basis on which to conduct the necessary resource documentation review. · Task 1.2 - Baseline Review The Padre team will conduct a comprehensive review of existing conditions. Based on review of the Final EIR and' Addendum to the Final EIR that were recently prepared, and proposed land uses in the Study Area, Padre will determine the existing conditions of the site. Task 1.3 - Environmental Analysis The Final EIR for the Orchard Ave Extension addressed project-specific impacts from construction and growth-inducing impacts in a 95-acre undeveloped area to the north (Study Area) that could be generated by future development of the area serviced by the roadway and circulation improvements. The Final EIR (and Addendum) analyzed the following project- specific and growth-inducing impacts: · Geologyand Soils · Hydrology · Wildlife and Vegetation · Cultural Resources · Fire Protection · Police Protection · Sewage Treatment and Disposal · Public Water · Traffic and Circulation · Schools · Air Quality · Aesthetics · Energy Use · Recreation · Noise · Land Use Page 3-4 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Altemative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre Pa;soclates, Inc. EHGINEER~, GEOLOGIST~ & Padre will perform an objective environmental analysis (and make a comparative analysis) of all impacts associated with the project and proposed alternative. It is assumed; however, that there would be no major change to the following project-specific impacts: · Geology and Soils o Improper construction of the bridge and the Orchard Avenue Extension could cause landsliding and soil erosion; o Proposed storm drain system could result in soil erosion; o If the roadway and bridge improvements are not properly constructed, they could fail during an earthquake; and, o If the roadway improvements are not properly constructed, they could fail due to soil constraints. · Hydrology o The bridge and roadway improvements could be flooded during a 100-year flood; o The extension of Orchard Avenue and construction of the bridge would increase runoff to Orr Creek; o Runoff from the new streets would transport pollutants to Orr Creek. · Air Quality o Construction of the roadway and bridge improvements would generate dust o The project would change traffic patterns and change air pollutant emissions at congested intersections As mentioned above, Padre will conduct a baseline conditions review to determine whether there are either changes in the environment or in proposed land uses in the Study Area that would change the growth-inducing impacts. Findings from Phase I will be utilized to complete the environmental impact analysis for the ADSEIR, if required. It is assumed that in general, there would be no change in growth-inducing impacts associated with the project alternative in comparison to the proposed project; however, because the extension would be routed adjacent to Highway 101, there may be changes to the following: · Aesthetics · Wildlife and Vegetation · Land Use · Noise · Traffic and Circulation Included below is a discussion of several of the key issue areas: Aesthetics. The bridge and roadway improvements would change views along Highway 101 and from residences located immediately south of Orr Creek near Orchard Avenue. The Final EIR identified this has a less than significant impact. Padre will determine Page 3-5 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre ~la;soclate=, inc. ENQ:~-'?RG, GEOI.OQISTI; & the minor change in visual impacts associated with the alternative bridge location; it is anticipated that visual impacts would be reduced with the project alternative. Biological Resources Task 1 - Data Review. Padre staff will review the existing biological information. Padre staff will create a preliminary list of special-status plant and animal species that have the potential occur in the project area based on documented occurrences and potential habitat, prior to conducting field surveys. Information on species occurrences and potential habitat will be acquired by contact with local CDFG staff, an up-to-date query of the CNDDB, a special-status species list from the USFWS, a review of California Native Plant Society (CNPS's) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California; Audubon Society inventories (Tare 1986); and other pertinent literature (Jennings and Hayes,' 1994; Moyle et al. 1989; Remsen 1978; Williams 1986). Task 2 - Reconnaisnace Field Survey. Based on a complete review of existing information, Padre will conduct a reconnaissance-level field survey of the proposed project and project alternative. Task 3 - Setting. Padre staff will prepare a biological setting section that will describe existing conditions, including vegetation, sensitive habitats (e.g., oak woodland), wetlands, wildlife habitat,, wildlife corridors, and special-status species. The discussion of existing .conditions will be based on the results of previous studies, and will discuss the regional setting and surrounding open space areas. Task 3 - Regulatory Review. A regulatory analysis will be conducted to identify State and Federal laws and regulations that could affect the project. As needed, the analysis will discuss any recent changes to CEQA, particularly mandatory findings of significance; revisions to the federal and state Endangered Species Acts, and other potential constraints imposed by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), Oak Woodlands Protection Act (Senate Bill 1334) and California fully protected species regulations. Task 4 - Impact Analysis. Padre will compile a list of potential significance thresholds for use in evaluating the effects of the project on biological resources. The thresholds will be based on CEQA Guidelines (Appendix G) issued by the California Office of Planning and Research (1999), and 'other locally derived standards established by the City of Ukiah. These specific significance thresholds will be utilized to analyze the significance of potential impacts to biological resources from project implementation. Project impact discussions will include, but will not be limited to the following issue areas: 1. A substantial adverse effect on any listed species or those designated as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status, which would result from either direct impacts (habitat loss due to construction activities) or through indirect habitat modifications (surface water quality degradation, reduction in dry season surface flow due to ground water use, introduction of predators, introduction of invasive species); 2. A substantial adverse effect on any habitat or other sensitive natural community through fragmentation and/or direct loss (e.g., oak woodland, riparian communities, etc.); Page 3-6 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Altemative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre Plso¢llt®B, ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 · . . A substantial interference with the movement of any wildlife species associated with the project site and surrounding areas; and Potential secondary impacts to the water quality, water inputs and habitat quality of known wetlands. Findings from the water resources analysis will be utilized for this effort. Padre will provide a quantified analysis of impacts based on the potential project-related modification of existing bio, logical resources as identified and mapped in the Setting section. The impact analysis will identify acres of each habitat type and plant community to be impacted or removed, estimated number of individuals of special-status species (if found to be present) to be adversely affected, and any adverse effects to wildlife corridors. Direct (primary), indirect (secondary), and cumulative impacts will also be identified. Indirect impacts may include water quality degradation of the various drainages and wetlands due to turbid or contaminated storm water run-off, risk of upset, noise, lighting, dust, and human presence associated with shod-term construction and long-term effects agricultural operations and the proposed future build-out scenario. Task 5 - Mitiqation. In coordination with the City of Ukiah, Padre will develop potential mitigation measures consistent with the goal of avoiding or reducing project impacts on biological resources to less than significant levels. Land Use. The analysis of impacts on land use will be completed by a qualified professional and will include, but not be limited to, the following: Task 1- Settinq/Consistency Determination. Determination of the proposed project's consistency with the City's adopted plans, ordinances, and policies. Task 2 - Impact Analysis. The proposed project will result in the transition in land use from the existing site to the uses proposed. The determination of the project's impact on existing land uses will include thresholds of significance for land use consistency impacts. The impact analysis will focus on whether the proposed project complies with adopted plans, ordinances, and policies that may conflict with adjacent land uses. The impact analysis will also discuss the potential effect on the community, such as whether it would physically divide a community or adversely change the character. . Task 3 - Mitiqation. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce the project's impact on existing land uses. Mitigation may include landscape buffers and setbacks to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses. Any residual or secondary impacts will also be identified and discussed. Noise. Construction of the bridge and roadway improvements would create noise that could affect nearby residents. The Final EIR identified this as a significant impact, but recommended noise reduction mitigation. Padre will determine the minor change in noise impacts associated with the alternative bridge location; because the road and bridge alingment would be located closer to Highway 101 and further away from existing residences, it is anticipated that noise impacts would be reduced with the project alternative. Transportation/Circulation. Crane Transportation Group (CTG) conducted the original traffic analysis for the Orchard Avenue Extension EIR. Based upon September 26, 2005 input Page 3-7 . Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre Pa;soclmtes, inc. ENGINEEI~8, GEOLOGISTS · [] ENVIRONMENTAL ~'IENTIST~ from Charlie Stump, City of Ukiah Planning and Community Development Director, land use designations in the project area have remained similar or become less intense than those evaluated in the EIR. Therefore, traffic projections contained in that document should be conservatively high. Also, base traffic projections contained in the EIR did not assume any freeway ramp connections to Orchard Avenue just north of the Orr Creek Bridge. The proposed realignment of Orchard Avenue adjacent to the east side of the U.S. 101 freeway (from Ford or Clara Streets north to Ford Road) would preclude the possibility of those ramps. Therefore, the base traffic analysis contained in the EIR is still appropriate. Assuming a realigned .Orchard Avenue adjacent to the freeway would not result in any significant difference in travel times along Orchard Avenue; the traffic projections and analysis contained in the original Orchard Avenue Extension EIR should still be usable. CTG will document why the realignment of'Orchard Avenue adjacent to the U.S. 101 freeway should not result in any significant changes to the base traffic analysis contained in the Orchard Avenue Extension EIR. A few sentences will also be provided indicating that the proposed realignment will significantly impact the ability of Caltrans, the City and the County to provide southbound on- and off-ramp connections to the U.S.101 freeway in the area of the realigned Orchard Avenue. Based on the results of this objective environmental analysis, Padre will conduct a review of the proposed alternative to determine whether the alternative is within the range of reasonable alternatives which would feasibly attain most of the project objectives, which include: · Examine the roadway improvements to determine if they can be constructed without significant environmental impacts to reduce traffic congestion; and, · Fulfill the City General Plan which recommends the extension of Orchard Avenue to Ford Road to provide an alternative north-south Major Arterial paralleling Highway 101. Task 1.4- Findings and Recommendations Alternatives are considered in an EIR to assist the public and decision-makers in considering the environmental consequences of a proposed project. The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider reasonable feasible options to reduce or avoid the significant impact of a proposed project. The range of alternatives to the proposed project is governed by the rule of reason. CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.6(a) states: "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." Further, Section 15126.6(b) states: "...the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly." The CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(c) states that "The range of potential alternatives to the project shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of Page 3-8 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Altemative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P!soc:late., Ino. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGI81~ & L~ ENVIRC; ~ -~ ;;~AL, ~K~N T m i u the proposed project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects. The EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the alternatives to be discussed. The EIR should also identify any alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process and briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency's determination." Factors to be used to discard alternatives are "(i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts. Padre will prepare findings of this analysis and will present these to the City in a work group session. As part of this session, Padre will make recommendations as to whether this alternative should be analyzed in a SEIR pursuant to CEQA should be discarded. Based on this review, Padre will determine whether the project alternative (1) meets most of the basic project objectives, (2) is feasible per discussion with City Public Works/Engineering Department (i.e., costs for acquiring the necessary right-of-way and potential redesign of the bridge), and (3) avoids or minimizes any significant environmental impacts. Task 1.5 - Determination to Whether to Proceed to Phase 2 Based on the findings and recommendations presented by Padre, the City will determine whether to proceed with preparation of a SEIR or discard the project alternative pursuant to CEQA. If necessary, Padre will assist in presenting the results of this analysis in a public hearing. 3.3.2 Phase 2- SEIR Preparation Task 2.1 - Administrative Draft SEIR Preparation This project phase includes all of the steps necessary to complete an Administrative Draft SEll=, (ADSEIR) for submittal to the City for the proposed project. The ADSEIR will contain all sections required by CEQA and will evaluate potential impacts associated with the environmental issue areas that were identified from the City's RFP and related materials. Specific tasks and analysis that would be completed to prepare the ADSEIR are descril:Jed below. Subtask 2.1.1 - Project Description and SEIR Outline. The Padre Team will utilize the detailed project description and SEIR outline developed during Phase 1 of the project. All subsequent environmental analysis will be based upon the approved project description. The SEIR outline will provide a structure in which information will be presented within the SEIR. Subtask 2.1.2 - Administrative Draft SEIR (ADSEIR) Preparation. To accelerate the schedule, Padre will begin developing the setting sections for the environmental analyses simultaneously with development of the project description and SEll=, outline. Should the project description be revised later in the SEIR preparation process, it may be necessary to conduct additional analysis not currently included in the project scope of work and cost estimate. Upon City authorization to proceed, we will begin preparation of the impact analysis and other items necessary for the development of the ADSEIR. The preparation of the ADSEIR will use the information contained in the previous area studies to the extent possible. Three (3) Page 3-9 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre Pesoclatel, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 · copies of the ADSEIR will be provided with appendices and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Our proposed scope of work and methodology for assessing potential environmental impacts of the proposed project is detailed in Section 3.4 of this proposal. Each major section of the ^DSEIR is described below. Subtask 2.1.2.1. Introduction. This section will include a narrative on the background of the project proposal and a brief summary of the environmental review and approval process. The SEIR approach will be clearly defined. Lead, responsible, and trustee agencies will be identified and the scope, content, and purpose of the SEIR will also be described. Subtask 2.1.2.2 - Executive Summary. The Executive Summary will include an introduction and purpose, a brief description of the project alternative, and a tabular summary of the environmental effects associated with the proposed project and project alternative. The table will be organized by level of environmental impact, including significant unavoidable adverse impacts (Class I), significant impacts that can be mitigated to a less than significant level (Class II), less than significant impacts (Class III), and beneficial impacts (Class IV). Subtask 2.1.2.3- Project Alternative Description. This section of the ADSEIR would consist of the prepared project alternative description, as described in Subtask 1.1. Subtask 2.1.2.4 - Environmental Setting. This section will provide a brief description of the existing environmental conditions in the project region and in the project area. Subtask 2.1.2.5- Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures. The main body of the ADSEIR will consist of the environmental impact analysis of the proposed project alternative. The analysis of each issue area will comprise a separate chapter that will have four main subsections, including: setting, impact analysis, mitigation measures, and level of significance after mitigation. Subtask 2.1.2.6 - Other Required Sections. Also included in the ADSEIR will be other sections required by CEQA, cumulative effects, table of contents, references, persons contacted, list of preparers, impacts determined to be less than significant, unavoidable impacts, etc. Subtask 2.1.27- Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. This subtask will include the preparation of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to comply with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. The MMRP'will include a brief introduction, project background, description of general components of the MMRP, a table that lists each mitigation measure, agency responsible for each condition, when monitoring must occur, the frequency of monitoring, and criteria to determine compliance within the condition (i.e., method of verification). The MMRP will identify the roles of persons responsible for implementation of the MMRP including a Mitigation Compliance Coordinator, Environmental Monitors, and Environmental Scientists. The purpose of this MMRP will be to verify project compliance with adopted mitigation measures prior to construction, during construction and throughout the life of the project (on a yearly basis) in order to determine the effectiveness of the mitigation. It will also include, where necessary, "post construction" monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation measures. The MMRP will include a dispute resolution procedure in the event the monitoring program generates disputes between the agency and the developer that cannot be Page 3-10 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre Passocl~tes, ino. ENGINEER~, GEOLOGI~T~ & quickly resolved. This will afford assurances to the City, as CEQA Lead Agency, that mitigation is carried out to the full extent. Task 2 - Draft SEIR (DSEIR) Preparation After receiving City comments regarding the ADSEIR, and meeting with City staff and others to review the comments, if desired by the City, Padre will incorporate appropriate changes and produce an intermediate product; a preliminary DSEIR (screen-check), to be provided to the City prior to production and circulation of the public draft. Once the preliminary DSEIR is reviewed for discrepancies and errors, Padre will produce (30) copies of the Draft SEIR with appendices. In addition, the DSEIR will be provided in hypertext markup language (HTML) format to be posted on the City's website (or Padre's website if required). Task 3 - Administrative Final SEIR (AFSEIR) Preparation This task will result in the preparation of the Administrative Final SEIR. As such, Padre will perform the following subtasks: Subtask 3.1 - Respond to Comments. The Padre Team, in conjunction with City staff, will respond to public and agency review comments on the DSEIR. All comments will be responded to in writing in a separate appendix in the AFSEIR. If required, . text changes and revisions will be made in the AFSEIR. For budget purposes we have included a time and materials not-to-exceed budget of 30 hours to prepare and respond to comments to the Draft SEIR. Subtask 3.2 - Prepare Administrative Final SEIR. The AFSEIR will include changes to the DSEIR text in response to comments, and appendices containing comments on the DSEIR and responses to those comments and the proposed MMRP. Three (3) copies of the AFSEIR with appendices and Administrative Response to Comments with appendices will be provided. Subtask 3.3 - Prepare Findings. Padre will prepare findings for the project pursuant to Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines for adoption by the City. Findings will be made for each significant effect. Each finding will be substantiated and appropriate pages in the SEIR referenced where appropriate. In necessary, Statements of Overriding Considerations will be prepared. Two unbound copies of the CEQA Findings will be provided. Task 4 - Prepare Final SEIR (FSEIR) After receiving clearance from the City, we will prepare and deliver the FSEIR, which will incorporate any changes requested by the City during the review of the AFSEIR. An interim product, which is either the proposed FSEIR revised pages or one single-sided copy of the FSEIR with the revisions in response to the review of the AFSEIR, will also be provided. Thirty (30) copies of the FSEIR will be provided. One set of CDs/diskettes (or other electronic medium acceptable to the City) in WordPerfect (current version, properly formatted), with the Draft and Final SEIR, mitigation monitoring program and appendices will be provided. Spreadsheets and/or databases Page 3-11 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Supplemental Environmental Impact Report adre P;soolmteB, Inc:, ENCIINEERS, GEOLOCIIST~ · [] developed' for this SEIR shall also be included on these diskettes using the City's latest spreadsheet software. Any ArcView GIS files will also be included on the CDs consistent with the City's required format. Task 5 - Staff Meetings The Padre Project Manager will be available to meet with City staff and others to discuss the City's comments on any phase of the SEIR process. We have made budget allocations for a minimum of three (3) meetings (in addition to the kickoff meeting). Padre will maintain a close working relationship with the City Project Manager through ~requent communications. Furthermore, Padre will provide regular status reports on all issues related to execution of the project. See Project Communications in Section 5.0 for more detail. Task 6 - Public Hearings As requested by the RFP, attendance at public hearings is presented as an itemized task. At the request of the City, Padre will make presentations, answer questions, and participate in public hearings. Our proposed budget is based on two (2) hearings/meetings and includes staff time and presentation materials. Page 3-12 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P;.oclate~, Inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 · 4.0 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Padre has been involved in a wide variety of significant projects throughout the state of California. The following is a list of CEQA documents and related projects prepared (or-in preparation) by Padre: Moorpark Road Realignment Project EIR Client: Ventura County Public Works Agency, Transportation Department Padre completed a Natural Environment Study, Water Quality Study, Phase I Archaeological Study, Environmental Impact Report, and Environmental Assessment for the realignment of an important transportation link between the cities of Moorpark, Camarillo and Thousand Oaks. Three alternatives were assessed to minimize loss of prime farmland and reduce exposure to flooding. Primary issues analyzed in the EIR include agricultural resources, cultural resources, noise, and flooding. This project was very contrOversial due to the potential for increased traffic within an affluent residential area (Santa Rosa Valley). An Extensive Phase I, and Focused Phase II archaeological studies were conducted, as part of the environmental review process for this project. North Sonoma County Agricultural Reuse Project Client: Sonoma County Water Agency Padre is preparing an Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the North Sonoma County Agricultural Reuse Project, which involves designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining distribution pipelines, lateral lines, several off-stream water storage facilities to distribute recycled water to approximately 21,000 acres of agricultural lands in the Russian River, Dry Creek, and Alexander Valleys. Primary issues being analyzed in the EIR/EIS include agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, land use, etc. Natural Environment Studies (NES), Santa Barbara County, California Client: Santa Barbara County Public Works Department Under a master services agreement with Santa Barbara County Public Works Department, Padre is preparing Natural Environment Studies (NES) for the repair or replacement of 10 bridges throughout Santa Barbara County, including: · Old Coast Highway Bridge (51C-113) over Nojoqui Creek · Bell Street Bridge (51C-157) over San Antonio Creek · Floradale Bridge (51C-006) over Santa Ynez River · Black Road Bridge (51C-031) over Orcutt Creek · Jonata Road Bridges (51C-225 and 226 over Zaca Creek · Jalama Road Bridge (51C-017) over Jalama Creek · Jalama Road Bridge (51C-013) over Salsipuedes Creek · Cathedral Oaks Bridge (51C-001) over San Antonio Creek, and · Rincon Bridge (51C-039) over Rincon Creek The NES are detailed reports used by Caltrans to comply with federal and state biological resource laws and regulations. The detailed NES's provide a basis for determining if Page 4-1' Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P!soclate., Inc. ENGINEERE, GEOLOGISTS · [] ENVIRONMENTAL ECIENTI~TS the bridge repair, rehabilitation, or replacement will result in any significant impacts. These NES reports include waters/wetlands delineation and assessment reports, botanical and wildlife surveys, visual and ultrasonic bat surveys, habitat mapping, regulatory compliance analyzes, essential fish habitat (EFH) evaluation, special-status species surveys and assessments (California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, least Bell's vireo, southwestern flycatcher, southern steelhead, tidewater goby, arroyo chub, and birds protected under federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act), and proposed mitigation measures to reduce adverse impacts to less than significant levels. All draft reports have been submitted to County staff; some of which have been finalized after review and approval by Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Natural Environment Study for the Replacement of the Calle Real Bridge Client: Santa Barbara County Public Works Department Padre conducted a natural environment study and wetlands delineation of the Calle Real Bridge replacement project impact area. The study was to be used in the preparation of environmental documents and permitting activities with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and California Department of Fish and Game. The proposed project involved road widening, stream flow diversion, installation of erosion control, and bridge removal and reconstruction. Biological resources of the area were assessed based field studies, including wildlife/fish and plant surveys, and literature review. Mature trees were also measured and mapped. The wetland delineation was performed per the routine procedures as contained in the Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). The study determined that the project would result in significant impacts to protected trees, sensitive habitat, wetlands and steelhead. Mitigation measures were provided in the study report that would offset these impacts through restoration of the western floodplain of the San Jose Creek. North Jameson Lane Bike Lanes Project, Santa Barbara County, California Client: Santa Barbara County Public Works Department Padre prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration and five special studies in support of a Class I bike path project requiring the replacement of roadway bridges over Oak Creek, San Ysidro Creek and Romero Creek. The special studies were completed in support of a Finding of No Significant Impact as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. These special studies were prepared as per Caltrans guidelines, and included a Floodplain Study, Natural Environment Study, Visual Impact Assessment, Water Quality Study and Lead Assessment (roadside deposition). In addition, an Archeological Study Report and Historic Property Survey Report were prepared by subconsultants under contract to Padre. Important issues included lead contamination of soils adjacent to U.S. 101, aesthetic impacts associated with removal of landscaping and trees, historical significance of the existing bridges, and potential impacts to steelhead and California red-legged frog. Page 4-2 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P;soelatoo, inc. ENGINEERO, GEOLOGIST8 · [] ENVLqONMENTAL ~_sf138T8 On-Call Contracts for Biological Impact Services, Biological Mitigation Projects, and Broad Range Environmental Services Client: Alameda County Public Works Agency Padre is managing a multi-year on-call contract for public works projects for the County of Alameda. Typical projects include bridge repair/replacement, road realignment, and flood control channel repair and improvements. Biological studies include endangered species surveys (San Joaquin kit fox, Central Coast steelhead, tidewater goby, California red-legged frog, Alameda whipsnake, and special-status bat species); biological field studies/constraints analyses, habitat mapping, jurisdictional wetland delineations; wetland functions and values assessments; and liaison with state and federal resource agencies. These data are included in Natural Environment Studies submitted to Caltrans. Padre staff have provided regulatory compliance assistance including permit application packages for Section 404 permits, Section 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreements, and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications for County projects. Padre staff have developed habitat restoration plans, designed and managed implementation of revegetation of construction sites, and performed pre- and post-construction vegetation and endangered species monitoring. Padre staff designed and monitored installation of biotechnical stream protection structure in Crow Creek. Plains Exploration and Production Phase IV Development Plan EIR Client: County of san Luis ObisPo Padre prepared an EIR for the proposed Plains Exploration and Production (PXP) Phase IV Development Plan. The project involved expansion of PXP's existing operations of the Arroyo Grande oil field by adding 125 new production wells, 30 new injection wells, creating 4 new pads, construction 3 stream generators, modifying 18 existing ones, and increasing production from 1,800- 1,900 barrels of per day (BOPD) to 5,000 BOPD. Key issues associated with the project included air quality, biological resources, aesthetics, noise,' hazards/risk of upset, and geology and soils. The EIR was fully endorsed by the County of San Luis Obispo Planning Commission; however, an appeal was made to the County of San Luis Obispo Board of Supervisors. An addendum is currently in preparation. Biorn LUO/LUE Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Draft EIR Client: County of San Luis Obispo Padre prepared a Draft EIR for the proposed Biorn LUO/LUE Amendment and Conditional Use Permit. The project involves an amendment to the South County Area Plan of the Land Use Ordinance and a conditional use permit for the Construction and operation of a portable stand-alone asphaltic concrete plant capable of using recycled asphalt and concrete; periodic operation of a portable lime system; periodic operation of a portable asphaltic concrete recycling facility; periodic operation of a portable rubberized asphaltic blending system that will be brought on-site on an as-needed basis; and, production of a maximum of 400,000 tons of asphaltic concrete per year. Page 4-3 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre Pssoclates, Inc. ENGINEER~;, GEOLOGI~T~ · Potrero Creek Sediment Control Project EIR Client: Ventura County Flood Control District The objective of the Potrero Creek Sediment Control Project was to reduce sediment transport and deposition from Potrero Creek into Westlake Lake and to protect lakeshore residences from erosion. The project included an in-channel sediment basin, three rows of vertical column baffles at the lake inlet, rock rip-rap bottom and bank protection, and an earth and rock dike on the lake bottom. Padre prepared an EIR for the Ventura County Flood Control District which addressed potential adverse impacts to water quality, noise, aesthetics, biological resources and air quality. The most notable significant impacts identified included short-term lake siltation associated with construction, and noise associated with operation of heavy equipment immediately adjacent to residences located along Potrero Creek. Appropriate mitigation measures were proposed by Padre within the EIR which reduced impacts to less than significant levels. Thacher Creek Flood Channel Replacement Project EIR Client: Ventura County Flood Control District The Thatcher Creek Flood Channel Replacement Project involved major channel improvements and instream structures to resolve flooding problems within an established community in Ojai, California. The project included components to facilitate steelhead migration, including widening the channel to remove a velocity barrier and adding a rock weir fish ladder. In general, the project has generated controversy within the community regarding off-site alternatives, and the balance between improved flood control and environmental impacts. As such, Padre prepared an EIR on behalf of the Ventura County Flood Control District, which focused on issues concerning steelhead migration, loss of oak trees and aesthetics, and also proposed mitigation to reduce project-related impacts to less than significant levels. Santa Rosa Creek Flood Mitigation Project EIR Client: County of San Luis Obispo An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared by Padre for the Santa Rosa Creek Flood Mitigation Project, located in the West Village of Cambria. The EIR evaluated environmental impacts associated with six project alternatives including flood bypass structures, supplemental berms, bridge replacement, floodwater detention basins, gravity- pressure storm drains, and auxiliary pumping plants. Primary issues analyzed in the EIR included biological resources, noise, air quality, cultural resources, and recreation. In addition to preparing the EIR, Padre staff conducted jurisdictional wetland Page 4-4 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report ENGINEER~, GEOLOGISTS · [] ENVIRONMENTAL 8CIENTIGTS delineations and surveys for California red-legged frog, two-striped garter snake, and southwestern pond turtle. The final EIR was certified by the Board of Supervisors in fall of 2001, and construction is scheduled for 2004. Padre's technical studies are being used by the County to secure state and federal permits for the project. Franciscan Culvert Initial Study Client: County of Santa Barbara Flood Control Department The preparation of the Franciscan Culvert Initial Study (IS) is one of several environmental services which Padre provides for the Santa Barbara County Public Works Department under our Master Services Agreement. The purpose of the project was the installation of a subsurface storm water culvert within a currently flood-prone area. The culvert would cross U.S. Highway 101 and other surface roads to discharge to a drainage channel north of Carpinteria Marsh and the Union Pacific railroad tracks in the City of Carpinteria. The detailed IS identified several significant impacts, all of which could be feasibly mitigated. The IS provided the basis of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared for the project. Padre completed an IS/MND in accordance with CEQA for the project, for the Montecito Water District. Since an application for a Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan was filed with the DHS, the DHS's NEPA-like process for environmental review was also followed. The environmental issues of the greatest concern were potential downstream flooding impacts due to the introduction of about five acres of impervious surface area and visual impacts associated with the roof structure. However, the IS did not identify any environmental impacts that would be significant after mitigation measures were applied. Therefore, a MND was prepared, and adopted by the lead agency. The final project design included covering the reservoir with a fixed structural roof, separating the reservoir inlet and outlet piping, installing baffles to promote reservoir circulation, and correction of minor sanitary defects in piping and vent systems. Rio Vista Natural Gas Pipeline IS/MND Client: California State Lands Commission Padre, in association with Environmental Stewardship and Planning prepared an IS/MND for the installation of a 10-mile long natural gas pipeline and dehydration facility proposed by Calpine Corporation to connect the Brannan Island gas fields on the east side of the Sacramento River to sales and distribution pipelines on the west side of the river. The project involved a 4,500-foot long horizontal directional bore under the Sacramento River, jack and bore under a number of public roads, and open trenching along the remainder of the pipeline alignment. Padre and ESP analysts developed a number of measures to reduce project impacts to less than significant levels, which facilitated use of an IS/MND. This allowed for an expedited construction start to meet environmental windows. Of particular note was close coordination with two air quality districts to allow use of reformulated diesel fuel, diesel catalytic converters, and purchase of emission credits to minimize construction-related emissions in a non-attainment region. The IS/MND was certified by the California State Lands Commission and the project was completed in 2003. Page 4-5 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre ~a;soclate~, in~. 'ENGINEERS, GEOLOGI8TB · ENVIRONMENTAL OCIENTISTS Carpinteria Creeks Watershed Management Plan Client: City of Carpinteria Padre completed the Carpinteria Creeks Preservation Program (Program) for the City of Carpinteria. The Program is a planning document that characterizes the environmental and regulatory setting associated with creeks that occur within the City, including Carpinteria, Franklin, Santa Monica, and Lagunitas Creeks. The Program also establishes a comprehensive framework of regulations to protect and restore these creeks and their riparian corridors, and to achieve compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations pertaining to habitat protection, flood control, and water quality. As part of the Program effort, Padre biologists completed the following tasks: · Research of baseline environmental conditions associated with local creeks including vegetation, wildlife, water quality, hydrology, geology, and land use history. · Extensive review of Federal, State, and local regulations pertaining to habitat protection, flood control, and water quality. · Evaluation of existing City r. egulations for deficiencies with respect to protecting and restoring local creek habitats, and meeting regulatory requirements. · Development of a framework of Program objectives, policies and implementation measures intended to protect and restore local creeks, and achieve regulatory compliance. As part of the Program, Padre prepared a detailed characterization of local creeks and riparian habitats, including discussions of habitat quality, vegetation communities, and local plant and animal species, with an emphasis on protected species (i.e., endangered, threatened, rare, etc.). Biological data was collected through a review of existing literature, maps, and aerial photographs, and the completion of field surveys. Botanical and wildlife surveys were completed along the creeks and riparian corridors, including Gobernador Creek, a tributary of Carpinteria Creek located upstream of the City limits. The section of Gobernador Creek that was surveyed is upstream of major agricultural and urban areas, and is intended to serve as a relatively undisturbed "reference site" for future creek restoration efforts. Stream bioassessments were conducted along three creek study reaches in the Carpinteria Creek watershed: two along lower Carpinteria Creek within the City limits, and one at the reference site along Gobernador Creek. The bioassessments involved detailed analysis of the physical and biological conditions present at the study reaches. Specific tasks that were completed as part of each bioassessment include a semi-quantitative stream habitat assessment, plant and wildlife surveys (terrestrial and aquatic), collection and identification of benthic macroinvertebrates, water quality sampling, measurement of stream flow and stream channel dimensions and, photo-documentation. Page 4-6 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre ENGINEER8, GEOLOGIIST8 A San Jose Creek Watershed Management Plan Client: County of Santa Barbara, Water Resources Group Padre Associates is currently working with the County Clean Water Project group to develop a management plan for the San Jose Creek watershed. This plan is being designed to serve as a prototype for future County Watershed Management plans. The Padre and County team are working with the stakeholders group to develop a framework for coordinating and prioritizing potential projects designed to protect, enhance, or restore creek water quality and associated habitat value. Tasks completed to date have included a baseline assessment of physical, biological, and socio-cultural resources within the watershed, physical characterization of primary watershed influence zones, and a develOpment of objectives and policies designed to govern coordinating of watershed management issues. Solano Windfarm Project- Biological Resources Inventory and Impact Analysis Client: Environmental Stewardship and Planning Under contract to ESP, Padre conducted biological surveys and impact analyses for the construction and operation of 33 wind turbines for the Solano Windfarm Project proposed by Enron Wind in the Montezuma Hills of Solano County, California. The Padre team assisted in the siting of individual wind turbines to minimize the impacts on raptors and migratory waterfowl, recommended wind turbine designs features such as blade size and length and tower height and configuration to minimize bird strikes. Padre staff identified and mapped biological resources on the 3,300-acre project site including special- status species habitats and jurisdictional waters and wetlands to aid in the siting of individual turbines and access roads. Padre conducted a CEQA-level analysis of turbine construction and operations on biological resources, which included identification of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts based on previous site studies, similar projects in the general area, and weight-of-evidence analyses. Padre prepared a regulatory analysis to determine local, state, and federal permits and authorizations required for project approval. A series of avoidance and impact minimization measures were formulated to offset project impacts. Folsom-Auburn Road Widening Project- Biological Surveys and CEQA Analysis Client: Planning Partners and City of Folsom Padre biologists, under contract to Planning Partners, conducted biological surveys and CEQA analysis of biological resource issues associated with the widening of a 0.75-mile section of Folsom-Auburn Road in the City of Folsom. Padre biologists inventoried all trees within the construction right-of-way, and measured diameter and assessed condition/vigor. Padre conducted surveys for special-status species, including valley elderberry longhorn beetle and Swainson's hawk, and conducted a delineation of jurisdictional waters and wetlands potentially affected Page 4-7 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre ENGINEERS, GEOLOGI~T~ · by construction. Padre planners analyzed the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the project on biological resources, and formulated feasible mitigation measures to reduce project impacts to less than significant levels. Padre staff prepared a Section 404 nationwide permit application, Section 7 biological assessment, Natural Environment Study a regulatory analysis to identify permits and authorizations required for project approval. Copart Site, Martinez, Contra Costa County- Implementation of Peppergrass Management Plan Client: Wickland Corporation Padre biologists headed the implementation of a Peppergrass Management Plan that included mechanical and chemical treatment measures. Padre surveyed the site and assisted the herbicide contractor in identifying application areas. Each peppergrass infestation area was marked with Stakes, numbered, and mapped on an aerial photograph to document the level of infestation for future monitoring purposes. Sensitive habitats or plants in the vicinity of infestations were identified and marked for special care. Chemical treatments will be used with two applications; any plants that survive both treatments will be hand-pulled. Follow-up treatments in subsequent years will be conducted on an as-needed basis consistent with the management plan. Zone 6 Line G Flood Control Channel- Biological Reconnaissance Survey, Wetland Delineation, Preconstruction Surveys, and Annual Vegetation Monitoring Client: Alameda County Public Works Agency The Zone 6 Line G flood control channel project in Fremont, California involved construction activities to widen and reconfigure the former trapezoidal channel to accommodate increased flows, while reducing the amount of erosion resulting from storm flows. To evaluate the biological impacts of the project, Padre, in association with HDR Engineering, conducted a preliminary delineation of waters and wetlands and biological reconnaissance surveys of the proposed reach. HDR/Padre prepared a Biological Reconnaissance Report, which included a habitat characterization and mapping, vegetation and wildlife inventories, and potential regulatory constraints. Prior to channel modifications, Padre conducted pre-construction surveys for California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, western burrowing owls, and nesting birds protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act that may occur onsite. After completion of construction, HDR/Padre prepared a restoration planting plan to increase natural riparian and wetland areas along the project reach. After vegetation installation, HDR/Padre prepared a Mitigation Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the project. HDR/Padre then conducted Year-0 (as-built) monitoring of the plant installations, and mapped each of the 200+ trees and shrubs using GPS unit. HDR/Padre is currently conducting annual vegetation monitoring, tracking the growth, condition, and location of each tree and shrub species installed along the stream bank. Monitoring also involves recording annual percent cover data of herbaceous vegetation installed using transects, and determining the success rate of the project restoration site. Page 4-8 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P;soclat®s, 'Inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGI~;T~ · [] ENVIRONMENTAl. ~C{EMT{~T~ Agua Caliente, Alameda County- Vegetation Monitoring Client: Alameda County Public Works Agency Revegetation of Agua Caliente Creek was conducted as part of an erosion control project in 1998. Padre Associates in association with HDR Engineering has conducted'annual monitoring on the plants installed since completion of the project. As part of the 2002 vegetation monitoring report, HDR/Padre recommended new plantings to compensate for damaged or dead individuals of species that were not meeting established performance criteria. HDR/Padre designed and coordinated the supplemental planting of the channel banks based on the original specifications outline in the Agua Caliente Planting Plan. HDP,/Padre then supervised the replanting efforts and recently conducted the annual vegetation monitoring of growth and survival for the Year-5 monitoring report in 2003. Altamont Pass Road, Livermore- Vegetation Monitoring of Mitigation Sites Client: Alameda County Public Works Agency Padre, in association with HDR Engineering, conducts annual monitoring of four mitigation sites on Altamont Pass Road. Monitoring consists of conducting surveys of tree and wetland plant species planted within a realigned stretch of Altamont Creek, analysis of riparian species planted in Altamont Creek upstream of the creek realignment, and an analysis of wetlands plant species planted at a created seasonal wetland area and California tiger salamander pond. After conducting monitoring activities, a report is prepared documenting the progress of the mitigation sites which is submitted to the regulatory agencies as a condition of the construction permits. Design and Technical Specification for Biotechnical Slope Stabilization of Crow Creek Project Client: LSA Associates, Inc. and Alameda County Public Works Agency Padre prepared biotechnical slope stabilization specifications for the installation of coir mattresses and fascines (rolls) along a reach of Crow Creek where banks have been repaired. The specifications detailed the type and amount of coir material, installation methods including staking and cordage, and rock toe reinforcement. Installation of the biotechnical materials over the re-contoured bank provides protection against stream and overflow scour, and provides substrate for the installation of herbaceous and woody vegetation that will further stabilize the bank, and enhance habitat quality. Padre provided on-site monitoring during the installation phase. Scottsdale Pond Fish Recovery Project Client: Dixon Marine Services and City of Novato Padre Associates was contracted to develop and implement a fish recovery program in association with the Scottsdale Pond Improvement Project. The improvement project was Page 4-9 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report ENQINIEEfl6, OEOLOGIST8 · designed to increase water quality and fish habitat by dredging accreted sediments from the 10- acre pond. The spoils were used to create two habitat islands for birds. The restored pond will be used as part of the urban fishing program. Prior to dredging, the pond was de-watered by pumping. Padre biologists used beach seines and dip nets to recover fish as they became concentrated in swallow pools. Native species (three-spine stickleback and prickly sculpin) and game species (smallmouth bass, green sunfish, channel catfish) were captured and transferred to an upstream holding pond for later release into the pond. Non-native fish, such as carp, goldfish, and mosquitofish were collected, dispatched, and transferred to a sanitary landfill to minimize odors, or frozen to provide food for marine mammal recovery centers. In total, over 600 fish were collected. The project was closely monitored by the California Department of Fish and Game and a detailed summary report was submitted upon completion of recovery efforts. Lake Merritt Channel- Fish Passage Investigation Client: Alameda County Public Works Agency Based on concerns expressed by regulatory agencies concerning potential fish passage constraints, Padre biologists, in association with Dr. Sam McGinnis from California State University Hayward and HDR Engineering, conducted an analysis of the optimal configuration for grate structures for a proposed trash rack between Lake Merritt and the Lake Merritt Channel to the Oakland Estuary. The analysis included field-testing of different grate spacing and orientation using typical San Francisco Bay and Oakland Estuary species including brown smoothhound shark, leopard shark, bat ray, steelhead, and striped bass. The field study was supplemented with literature reviews and analysis, and investigation of similar structures at other locations in the San Francisco Bay area. Based on these results, the County was provided with a series of recommendations for the trash rack design that would permit passage of most size classes of target fish species. Copart Auto Auction Facility- Environmental Monitoring Services Client: Wickland Corporation Padre biologists developed a feral cat and nuisance rodent control plan for the Copart Auto Storage and Auction Facility adjacent to San Francisco Bay. The purpose of the plan was to minimize development impacts on the salt marsh harvest mouse, a federal and state-listed endangered species that inhabits adjacent salt marshes. The plan includes an array of preventative measures to discourage site occupancy by feral cats and non-native rodents, as well as active trapping and disposition plans. The plan was prepared in compliance with project permit approvals from the City of Martinez, and as conditions of no adverse affect findings from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. Padre biologists also monitored and directed implementation of a Peppergrass Management Plan .at the facility to control the non-native invasive peppergrass plant in order to restore native vegetation and salt marsh harvest mouse habitat. Control measures included mechanical and chemical treatment measures. Padre surveyed the site and assisted the Page 4-10 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Altemative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre ENQINEERI, GEOLOGIST8 A herbicide contractor in identifying application areas. Each peppergrass infestation area was marked with stakes, numbered, and mapped on an aerial photograph to document the level of infestation for future monitoring purposes. Sensitive habitats or plants in the vicinity of infestations were identified and marked for special care. Chemical treatments will be used with two applications; any plants that survive both treatments will be hand-pulled. Padre biologists monitored treatment efficacy and recommended follow-up treatments on an as-needed basis. Page 4-11 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P~ssoclate~, Inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST~ A [] ENVtRONMENTAL ~CIENTIS1~ 5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL 5.1 PADRE ASSOCIATES CEQA TEAM MANAGEMENT The Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) CEQA team for the proposed project will be overseen by Padre Principal-in-Charge, Mr. Simon Poulter, who will oversee all aspects of the project and assure the project is completed to the satisfaction of the City staff. Assisting Mr. Poulter will be the Project Manager and Task Leaders selected for their specialized expertise and experience. The Project Manager will serve as the key personnel available to the City throughout the Project. The members of the project team have worked together' successfully on numerous projects and bring extensive experience to the proposed project.' A team organization chart is provided below: City Project Manager Planning and Community Department Charley Stump I Principal-In-Charge Simon Poulter Project Manager Kris Vardas I Project Staff Rick Meredith Donna Hebert Sarah Powell 5.1.1 Principal/Project Manager/Staff Mr. Simon Poulter will serve as the Principal-in-Charge as part of the Padre team. Mr. Poulter is a principal of Padre and has been working as an environmental consultant for over 17 years. He was the Program Manager for Resources Management Services at Fugro West for 6 years prior to establishing Padre Associates, Inc. Mr. Poulter currently manages Padre's Environmental Sciences and Planning Group. In this role he is responsible for supervising the day-to-day operations of the group including marketing, contracts administration, staffing, quality assurance, cost control, and scheduling of ongoing projects. Page 5-1 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre Passoclat®., inc. 'ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS · [] ENVINONMENTA~ 8~IEN'I~S'TS Mr. Poulter's experience includes the preparation of numerous environmental impact reports (EIAJEIR/EIS), resource assessment studies, and environmental training programs for projects within the western United States, as well as several international projects. As Principal- in-Charge Mr. Poulter will have ultimate responsibility over the project and for ensuring satisfactory execution of the contract with the City and agreements with subconsultants. Mr. Kris Vardas will serve as Project Manager for the project. As Project Manager, Mr. Vardas will be responsible for providing guidance to the team members, and reviewing each section to ensure its conformance with the overall document format, CEQA, and scope requirements. Mr. Yardas will also provide final quality control review of work products prior to their release to the City. Mr Vardas will participate in all meetings and hearings for the project. The Project Manager will be available to the City at any time for telephone progress updates on the project. If at any time during the life of the project, any out-of-scope work items appear necessary, the project manager will inform the City and obtain their approval prior to execution of any such work requiring a scope and/or budget modification. Mr. Vardas will also be involved in the preparation of sections of the EIR. He has earned a B.S. in Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning and an MBA and has several years experience as an environmental planner for the preparation of physical, biological, and cultural resource assessments for inland and coastal projects and oversight for the preparation of environmental impact assessments for both inland and coastal projects. His experience includes regulatory compliance, permitting, and mitigation monitoring. Mr. Vardas has been involved in large controversial projects while previously employed with the California State Lands Commission and the California Department of Water Resources. Mr. Vardas is currently preparing an EIR/EIS for the North Sonoma County Agricultural Reuse Project. Mr. Vardas assisted in the preparation of the El Pomar-Estrella Area Plan Update EIR and recently prepared an EIR for the Plains Exploration and Production Phase IV Oil Field Development Plan for the County of San Luis Obispo. Mr. Vardas is currently managing the preparation of an EIR for the County for the Biorn LUO/LUE Amendment and CUP, an EIR/EIS for the Morro Bay State Park Marina Renovation and Enhancement Project, an EIR for the Grant Joint Union High School District New High School/Middle School, an IS/MND for the Burton School District New Middle School Project, and an IS/MND for the Town of Loomis Taylor Road Mixed-Use project. Mr. Vardas has completed several project management courses endorsed by the Project Management Institute and fully understands project budgeting, scheduling, and controlling, and contract administration. He received training in day-to-day project management while previously employed with the California State Lands Commission. Mr. Vardas is currently a Planning Commissioner with the City of Pismo Beach Planning Commission. Mr. Richard Meredith joined Padre Associates in 1999. He has over 24 years of experience as a biologist/project manager on a variety of public and private sector projects with specialized expertise in biological impact analyses for large flood control, military, water resources, and other public works projects. He has managed multidisciplinary teams of scientists, planners, and engineers in the preparation of environmental studies under NEPA, CEQA, and international environmental impact assessment guidelines. Page 5-2 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Altemative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P;Bo~leteB, Jno. ENQINEER8, GEOLOGIST8 · Mr. Meredith has a wide range of experience conducting biological studies in support of CEQA and NEPA environmental assessments including baseline resource evaluations, biological and regulatory constraints analyses, habitat studies, development of significance thresholds, and developing and implementing mitigation strategies, including use of Incremental Cost Analysis. His experience with special-status species includes formal and informal consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game under the federal and California Endangered Species Acts; field evaluations of listed and proposed species using habitat-based and approved survey protocols; pre-construction tailgate orientations for construction crews; construction monitoring and post-construction assessments; and coordination and preparation of habitat conservation plans. Mr. Meredith has over 20 years experience in conducting wetland and jurisdictional waters delineations under Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This includes 10 years of County experience in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' regulatory and environmental planning programs where he was responsible for the assessment and processing of federal permits, conducting jurisdictional wetland delineations, designing and implementing wetland mitigation/restoration projects, performing Section 404 (b)(1) evaluations, and preparing supporting NEPA documents. He has received extensive training in wetland resources, including specialized training the federal wetland delineation methodology, and is a certified wetland scientist. His e-mail address is rmeredith~padreinc.com. Ms. Donna M. Hebert is experienced in all phases of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process from initial studies to the preparation of findings and .mitigation monitoring plans. She has managed the preparation of numerous environmental impact reports. Her primary issue areas of expertise are aesthetics, land use, health and safety, and public service impact assessment. She has also prepared numerous noise, geology, air quality, and agricultural resource evaluations for inclusion in CEQA and NEPA documentation as well as preliminary siting studies. Ms. Hebert's permitting experience involves industrial projects in environmentally sensitive settings. She has facilitated the permitting process for numerous projects with multi-agency involvement. Ms. Hebert also has extensive experience with water and wastewater infrastructure projects. This experience includes open reservoir covering projects in Montecito and Carpinteria and a new service tank for Carpinteria Valley Water District. Ms. Sarah Powell joined Padre Associates, Inc. in 2000 as a botanists and environmental analyst. She is part of the biological team at Padre and is responsible for conducting sensitive plant surveys, wetland delineations, vegetation mapping and monitoring, ecological analysis, and regulatory compliance. She has considerable experience in conducting wetland delineations and preparing biological assessments for special-status species. Ms. Powell has taken coursework in CEQA analysis, California Endangered Species Act and Streambed Alteration Agreements, Wetland Delineation Training, and preparing biological assessments. Ms. Powell has considerable experience in Alameda County conducting long- term monitoring studies for public works projects. Page 5-3 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre Pssoclat®8, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLO(31STS · 5.1.2 Administrative Padre's administrative services group will be included as part of the project team to ensure that project deliverables are formatted and edited per City requirements. Ms. Annette Varner will lead this group. Ms. Varner is a technical writer and editor. She has been with Padre for 5 years and is responsible for performing technical writing/editing services of all Padre client deliverables. 5.1.3 Project Management Methodology Padre will utilize an integrated project management lifec~;cle for this project, whereby the project will be managed using a deliverable-based approach, with specific deliverables and milestones defined for each phase. When Padre receives authorization for the project, the project manager will complete several items to set up the project and allow the work to proceed smoothly. These items will include the following: · Project Set-Up Form; · Project Files; · Budgets and-Schedules; · Project Organization; and, · Task Descriptions for Project Participants. 5.2 PROJECT MONITORING AND CONTROLLING During project execution, the Project Manager is tasked with monitoring and controlling the budget, schedule, conformance to project requirements, and for assembling a permanent record (file) of the project. Project monitoring is an interactive part of tracking and is firmly tied to project planning. It takes the outputs of tracking and uses them to determine planned versus actual. There are several tools available to the Project Manager to assist in these tasks, including the accounting system, and budget/schedule spreadsheets/graphs. 5.2.1 Accounting System During the project setup, the project manager establishes the budget and schedule for each task and the tools required to monitor the progress of the work. The Project Manager reviews this work with the supervising Principal. The accounting system can track time and expenses by task, but the data cannot be manipulated as easily as data in a spreadsheet. Therefore, a budget spreadsheet is prepared for tracking purposes. The scheduling tool chosen for a project matches the complexity of the project. Simple bar chart schedules developed on spreadsheet programs suffice for small projects. Scheduling programs, such as Microsoft Schedule, are used for more complex projects. Clients are given a budget and schedule update on a regular basis. In most cases the update takes the form of a telephone conversation or a fax message with summary spreadsheet data and schedule graphs attached. Page 5-4 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative RoUte Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre F~I$IOC:I~BteI~ Inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS · The Project Manager can access the accounting system to generate reports regarding the financial status of the project. The accounting system details all time and expenses posted to the project to date, the budget authorized by task, and the amounts invoiced and collected. Time and expenses are posted every Friday, so reports can be run on Monday to track time and expenses on a weekly basis. 5.2.2 Quality Assurance Plan A project-specific Quality Assurance Plan will be generated for this project; and will be based upon Padre's general Padre Quality Assurance Plan. This plan is typically reviewed at the start of every project to extract those items that are applicable to the project. On large or complex projects, such as this project, a specific Quality Assurance Plan is developed using the general plan as a guideline. Reviews and assessments will be performed by Padre on an ongoing basis, both scheduled and ad-hoc, to ensure that quality deliverables are being completed on time. The reviews will include a review of the deliverables themselves to ensure their objectives map to overall project objectives, a review of the time to completion, and schedule for the delivery of each deliverable. Finally, the reviews will attempt to identify any critical components that do not appear to be in the deliverable, but were identified in the scope of work. 5.2.3 Project Files The Project Manager will be tasked with monitoring the project files. These files are the permanent record of the work and are kept organized so that the project could be completely reconstructed (including reports) solely on the basis of the file. The following documentation is available in the project files during project execution. · Proposals, contracts, purchase orders, and client authorizations; · Correspondence to and from the client; · Records of verbal communications; · Drawings, specifications, and project-specific procedures; · Photographs; · Laboratory and field data and test results; and, · Documentation of the development of tables, figures, and analyses. 5.3 PROJECT COMMUNICATIONS The Project Manager will serve as the focal point for internal and external communications, both oral and written. The Project Manager will facilitate a close working relationship with the City Project Coordinator and will keep her/him abreast of all issues pertaining to the project. Regular progress reports will be submitted, outlining work completed, planned activities, outstanding issues, work-in-progress, and related information. Of paramount importance to Padre is effective and complete communication. As such, considerable effort will be made to ensure that City staff is frequently and completely briefed on all work in processes. Page 5-5 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Im a~_p_.~.~_~ort adre pssoclates, inc. [] EN~qnONMF. m'~ ~CtEN'ns'rs 5.3.1 Issues Resolution The Project Manager will utilize an issue resolution process to organize, maintain and track the identification and resolution of issues that arise throughout the course of project. The issue resolution process provides for a single point of entry, organization, and categorization of all project issues. Issues may originate from inside and outside of the project. For example, a City policy change in the middle of EIR development may result in one or more issues. It is expected that the majority of issues will be day-to-day issues concerning the internal operations of the project. 5.3.2 Change Management Process Scope and change order processes are essential for managing the factors that can impact project cost, project schedule, and/or project success. Changes in scope may arise from legislative changes, applicant needs, input from project sponsors and external agencies. The ' goal of implementing management mechanisms for scope and change orders is to make sure that the project is delivered on time and on budget with the required scope. If an issue is identified to have a potential scope issue, it is communicated to the Project Manager. At the same time, the Project Manager assigns it to a team member who will assess project impact, schedule impact and cost impact. 5.4 CONFLICT OF INTEREST Padre Associates, Inc. hereby affirms that it has no conflict of interest with the project. Padre has not previously performed work at the project site and Padre is not under any contract for work at the site at this time. All work described under this proposal will be carried out in an objective, unbiased manner to the full requirements of the City of Ukiah. Page 5-6 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P~;soclates, inc. [i~ ENGINEER~;, GEOLOOIST$ · 6.0 SCHEDULE AND BUDGET 6.1 SCHEDULE Table 6-1 provide a comprehensive overview of the anticipated project schedule. This proposed schedule includes a complete review of the project alternatives, completion of necessary fieldwork, preparation and circulation of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and approvals by the City Council. Time has also been included to participate in all required meetings and hearings. Table 6-1. · Project Kickoff · Project Altemative Description/Draft SEIR Outline (3 copies) · Environmental Analysis/Work Group Meeting · Final SEIR Outline (2 copies) · Final Project Description · Coordinate on project with City and parties. Participate in four meetings. Project Schedule Overview Upon Notice to Proceed and as scheduled by the City. Within 7 workings days of kickoff meeting. Within 30 working days of kickoff meeting. Within 7 working days of completion of working group meeting. Within 5 working days of receipt of all comments on the revised project description. Throughout process, but particularly dudng the initial phases of the SEIR preparation. · Administrative Draft SEIR (3 copies) Within 40 working days of receipt of the corrected project description. · Corrected Administrative Draft EIR (1 Within 20 working days of receipt of all comments on the Administrative Draft single-sided copy, may only include SEll:{. revised pages) · Draft SEIR (30 copies) Within 10 working days of receipt of all comments on the corrected Administrative Draft SEIR. · Attend hearings At the end of the 45 day review period or other time proposed by the City. · Mitigation Monitoring Plan To be prepared concurrently with the DSEIR process. · Administrative Final SEIR (3 copies) After the 45-day review period and within an estimated 20 working days after receipt of all comments on the DSEIR. · Proposed Final SEIR (1 single sided Within 10 working days after receipt of comments on the AFSEIR. copy or revised pages only) · Final SEIR (30 copies, unbound, bound Within 10 days after receipt of cOmments on the proposed Final SEIR. and electronic) · Prepare Findings Concurrent with preparation of the FSEIR described above. · Attend Headngs At the discretion of the City. 1 set of CDs with Draft and Final SEIR, mitigation monitoring program, and appendices, and any GIS data developed Two unbound copies of CEQA Findings and an electronic version At the discretion of the City. At the discretion of the City. Page 6-1 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route 'Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre P~soclates, Inc. ENGINEEFIS, ~-~LOGISTB · 6.2 BUDGET Padre will provide the scope of services to complete the SEIR as detailed in this proposal for a cost not to exceed $36,460. Table 6-2 provides the overall budget estimate with costs broken down by task. Assumptions have been made in the preparation of this budget estimate including those identified in the City RFP, others identified throughout this proposal, and the additional assumptions identified below. · Comments from the City on all review documents will be compiled by the City's SEIR Project Coordinator into one comprehensive submittal; and, ° A written transcript of comments made at the public hearings will be provided. This will be the basis for the responses to comments received during the hearings. Should the actual scope of services required exceed the estimates outlined in this proposal, the services/materials in excess of that assumed can be provided, as approved by the City, but may result in a modification to the budget and/or schedule. The proposed scope of services and associated costs are fully negotiable to meet the needs of the City. This offer for professional services will remain in effect for a period of 90 days from the date of this proposal. During this period, questions regarding the proposal may be directed to Mr. Kris Vardas at (805) 786-2650, ext. 3 or Mr. Simon Poulter at (805) 683-1233, ext. 4. Page 6-2 Proposal for Professional Services Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Environmental Impact Report adre Pa!soclat®s, Ino. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & 7.0 REFERENCES The following persons are past and current clients of Padre Associates and are familiar with Padre's capabilities City of Atascadero Community Development Department Mr. Warren Frace, Community Development Director (805) 461-5000 City of Atascadero Community Development Department Mr. Steve McHarris, Deputy Community Development Director (805) 461-5000 City of Morro Bay Harbor Department Mr. Rick Algert, Director (805) 772-6259 City of Pismo Beach Community Development Department Randy Bloom, Community Development Director (805) 773-4658 City of San Luis Obispo Public Works Department Mr. Matt Horn (805) 781-7108 City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department Ms, Para Ricci (805) 781-7168 · County of San Luis Obispo, Mr. James Caruso (805) 781-5702 · Countyof San Luis Obispo, Public Works Department Mr. Eric Wier (805) 781-2766 · County of San Luis Obispo, Environmental Division Mr. Steve McMasters (805) 781-5096 · County of Santa Barbara, Public Works Department Mr. Bill Tracy (805) 681-5694 · Calleguas Municipal Water District Mr. Eric Berg (805) 579-7128 · Sonoma County Water Agency Mr. David Cuneo (707) 547-1935 · Ventura County Public Works Department Mr. John Crowley (805) 654-2075 Page 7-1 APPENDIX A Padre Fee Schedule 2002 FEE SCHEDULE adre Pa;soclate., inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 2002 STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE PR OFESSION~4L SER VICES Senior Principal Professional ................................................................................... $ Principal Professional ............................................................................................... $ Senior Professional .................................................................................................. $ Project Professional .................................................................................................. $ Staff Professional .................................................................. : ................................... $ Senior Technician ..................................................................................................... $ Technician ................................................................................................................ $ Drafting ..................................................................................................................... $ Word Processing ...................................................................................................... $ 140/hr 130/hr 105/hr 90/hr 80/hr 70/hr 60/hr 50/hr 45/hr Fees for expert witness preparation, testimony, court appearances, or depositions will be billed at the rate of $250 per hour. 0 THER DIRECT CHAR GES Subcontracted Services ..................................................................................... Cost Plus 15% Outside Reproduction ......................................................................................... Cost Plus 15% Travel, Subsistence, and Expenses ................................................................... Cost Plus 15% Vehicle ...................................................................................................................... $ 75/day Photoionization Detector .......................................................................................... $ 125/day Nuclear Density Gauge ............................................................................................ $ 65/day Automobile Mileage .................................................................................................. $ 0.37/mile APPENDIX B Padre Resumes Resume adre Pa;soclates, inc. 'ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST8 Richard W. Meredith Senior Principal Biologist EDUCATION: QUALIFICATIONS: M.S. Biology, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri. 1987 B.S. Biological Science, California State University, Hayward, CA. 1977 · Project Manager and Senior Principal Biologist · Certified Wetland Scientist (Society of Wetland Scientists, No. 165) · Certified Associate Ecologist (Ecological Society of America) · 40-Hr. Hazardous Waste Certification (HAZWOPER) · California Wildlife Collection Permit EXPERIENCE: Mr. Meredith joined Padre Associates in 1999~ He has over 24 years of experience as a biologist/project manager on a variety of public and private sector projects with specialized expertise in biological impact analyses for large flood control, public works, military, and water resources projects. He manages multidisciplinary teams of scientists, planners, and engineers in the preparation of environmental impact studies under NEPA, CEQA, and international environmental impact assessment regulations. Mr. Meredith has a wide range of experience conducting biological studies for CEQA and NEPA environmental assessments including baseline resource evaluations, biological and regulatory constraints analyses, habitat studies, formulation of significance thresholds, and development and implementation mitigation strategies. His experience with special-status species includes formal and informal consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game under the federal and California Endangered Species Acts; field evaluations of listed and proposed species using habitat-based and approved survey protocols; pre-construction tailgate orientations for construction crews; construction monitoring and post-construction assessments. He is currently managing preparation of a multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan, including CEQA and NEPA impact assessments. Mr. Meredith has over 20 years experience in conducting wetland and jurisdictional waters delineations under Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This includes 10 years of agency experience in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' regulatory and environmental planning programs where he was responsible for the assessment and processing of federal permits, conducting jurisdictional wetland delineations, designing and implementing wetland mitigation/restoration projects, performing Section 404 (b)(1) evaluations, and preparing supporting NEPA documents. He has received extensive training in wetland resources, including specialized training the federal wetland delineation methodology, and is a certified wetland scientist. Resume adre Pa;sociates, inc. 'ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST8 RELEVANT PROJECTS Examples of Mr. Meredith's experience relevant to the Alameda County PWA on-call biological services contract include: On-Call Contracts for Biological Impact Services,. Biological Mitigation Projects, and Broad Range Environmental Services For the Alameda County Public Works Agency and HDR Engineering Mr. Meredith is project manager and lead biologist for a multi-year on-call contract for public works projects for the County of Alameda. Typical projects include bridge repair/replacement, road realignment, and flood control channel repair and improvements. Biological studies include endangered species surveys (San Joaquin kit fox, Central Coast steelhead, tidewater goby, California red-legged frog, Alameda whipsnake, and special-status bat species); biological field studies/constraints analyses, habitat mapping, jurisdictional wetland delineations; wetland functions and values assessments; and liaison with state and federal resource agencies. Prepared permit application packages for Section 404 permits, Section 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreements, and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications for County projects. Developed habitat restoration plans, designed and managed implementation of revegetation of construction sites, and performed pre- and post-construction vegetation and endangered species monitoring. Mr. Meredith developed scopes of work, budgets, and schedules; managed fieldwork, report preparation, and quality control. He manages numerous concurrent task orders. Projects include: Mission Creek Habitat Restoration Lake Elizabeth Dredging Lake Merritt Trash Screen Repair Agua Caliente Bank Stabilization Zone 6 Line E Erosion Control Alameda Creek (Zone 5 Line A) Zone 6 Line D1 Vasco Road Safety Improvement Crow Canyon Road Improvements Vargas Road Zone 3A Line D Desilting Crow Creek Slope Protection Zone 6 Line G Flood Control Enhancement Crow Creek Slide Restoration Glen Echo Creek Ward Creek (Zone 3A Line E) Zone 3 Line A Altamont Pass Road Realignment Iron Horee Road Happy Valley Road Habitat Conservation Plan Preparation for Altamont Expansion (Waste Management), Alameda County, California For Waste Management of Alameda County and Harding Associates Landfill Lawson Mr. Meredith is managing preparation of a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Altamont Landfill Expansion. The HCP will provide a conservation plan for species that are listed or have the potential to become listed under the federal and California Endangered Species Acts that could be affected by the landfill expansion. The HCP will help facilitate the acquisition of an incidental take permit from the US Fish and Wildlife Service to authorize the take of federally listed species that could occur within the landfill expansion area. The HCP will identify likely project impacts on special-status species, biological goals and objectives of the project, identify measures for minimizing and mitigating impacts, long-term monitoring procedures, and development of an adaptive management plan. The agency draft HCP has been completed. Resume adre Pssociate., inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS EIR Preparation, Cambria Flood Control/Prevention Project, Cambria, San Louis Obispo County, California For County of San Louis Obispo Mr. Meredith managed preparation of the Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Rosa Creek Flood Mitigation Project for the West Village of Cambria. The EIR evaluated environmental impacts associated with six project alternatives including flood bypass structures, supplemental berms, bridge replacement, floodwater detention basins, gravity-pressure storm drains, and auxiliary pumping plants. Primary issues analyzed in the EIR include biological resources, including wetlands and special-status species, noise, air quality, cultural resources, and recreation. The final EIR has been certified by the County, and the project is slated for construction in 2004. The EIR will serve as a basis for permit approvals associated with the proposed project. NEPA and CEQA Studies Mr. Meredith has managed preparation of numerous environmental impact studies from categorical/statutory exclusions and exemptions to comprehensive joint EIS/EIR's. Representative projects include: · Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) for a Proposed Gravel Extraction Operation and Expansion of an Existing Gravel Extraction Operation in the Garcia River. For County of Mendocino, California · Proposed Avocet Tungsten Evaporation Pond Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR), Pine Creek Facility. For U.S. Forest Service-lnyo National Forest and Inyo Co., California · Contract NEPA Assessment Services, California. For Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Region IX · Base Comprehensive Plan Environmental Assessment. For U.S. Air Force, Beale Air Force Base, California Natural Environment Studies (NES), Santa Barbara County, California For Santa Barbara County Public Works Department Under a master services agreement with Santa Barbara County Public Works Department, Mr. Meredith managed the preparation of Natural Environment Studies (NES) for the repair or replacement of 10 bridges throughout Santa Barbara County, including: · Old Coast Highway Bridge (51C-113) over Nojoqui Creek · Bell Street Bridge (51C-157) over San Antonio Creek · Floradale Bridge (51C-006) over Santa Ynez River · Black Road Bridge (51C-031) over Orcutt Creek · Jonata Road Bridges (51C-225 and 226 over Zaca Creek · Jalama Road Bridge (51C-017) over Jalama Creek · Jalama Road Bridge (51C-013) over Salsipuedes Creek · Cathedral Oaks Bridge (51C-001) over San Antonio Creek, and · Rincon Bridge (51C-039) over Rincon Creek The NE$'s are detailed reports used by Caltr. ans to comply with federal and state biological resource laws and regulations. The detailed NES's provide a basis for determining if the bridge rehabilitation will result in any Resume adre Pa;soclates, inc. 'ENGINEERS, GEOLOGIST8 & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST8 significant impacts. These NES reports include jurisdictional wetland delineations, botanical and wildlife surveys, visual and ultrasonic bat surveys, habitat mapping, regulatory compliance analyzes, essential fish habitat (EFH) evaluation, special-status species surveys and assessments (California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, southcoast steelhead, tidewater goby, arroyo chub), and proposed mitigation measures to reduce adverse impacts to less than significant levels. All draft reports have been submitted to County staff; some have been finalized after review and approval by Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Environmental Studies at the Former Fort, Fort Ord, California For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Mr. Meredith managed and conducted a number of biological and planning studies in support of the closure of Fort Ord under the Base Realignment and Closure process: · Baseline Habitat Inventory, Site 3 of Beach Trainfire Ranges. Mr. Meredith managed the baseline habitat inventory of the former firing ranges to characterize plant and animal resources on the site prior to lead remediation activities. Tasks included mapping and quantifying vegetation types using line-intercept transect sampling, quadrat sampling, and walk-over surveys, assessing the condition and extent of habitat for special-status species (Smith's blue butterfly, sand gila, Monterey spineflower, coast wallflower, and black legless lizard), and collecting and storing seeds for future restoration activities. · Additional Ecological Risk Evaluations, Site 3- Beach Trainfire Ranges. Mr. Meredith managed a study of the effects of lead concentrations in the soil at an abandoned firing range on the growth/condition of two species of buckwheat that provide breeding habitat for the federally endangered Smith's blue butterfly. Collected and analyzed morphometric data from plants from 70 plots with varying soil lead concentrations. The results were used to determine appropriate remediation efforts. · Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP). Mr. Meredith managed preparation of INRMP for Presidio of Monterey (POM) and Presidio of Monterey Annex (POM Annex), which guidelines for land use, fish and wildlife, outdoor recreation, cultural resources, and urban forest resources. The INRMP will be used to guide the management of natural resources at the installations and will support the installation master plan. Biological Field Studies and Environmental Impact Studies for Petro- leum Projects, Amazonian Rainforest of Eastern Ecuador. ARCO Oriente Inc., Oryx Ecuador Energy Co., and Texaco Mr, Meredith was field operations manager responsible for reconnaissance teams and report preparation for two pipeline routing studies. He conducted extensive field reconnaissance studies to collect biological, socioeconomic, and archaeological data, map vegetative communities; and delineate critical habitats and significant archaeological sites. Data were used to assess'impacts of alternative routes, identify environmentally preferred alternatives, and develop mitigation management plans, sociological intervention plan for indigenous populations, spill contingency plans, and environmental management plans. Mr. Meredith was lead field Resume PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: adre Passoclates, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS biologist for two environmental audits of Texaco's oil production sites in eastern Ecuador prior to sale and transfer to PetroEcuador. Biological Mitigation Services Contracts U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Mr. Meredith managed and was lead biologist on mitigation planning and restoration projects for the Corps. These included: · Fisheries Impact Analysis, Kings River and Pine Flat Reservoir. Using thermal modeling and incremental instream flow studies (IFIM) to determine flow and temperature constraints, tangible and intangible benefits of the restoration alternatives were arrayed to compare alternatives and identify the most cost-effective restoration method. · Sacramento River Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Plan. Economic and environmental costs/benefits were determined for restoration plans, including setback levees, acquisition of real estate, reconnection of cutoff oxbows, and restoration of salmonid habitat, at five flood control sites. · Impact of Increased Flood Control Storage on Resident and Migratory Wildlife, Lake KaWeah, CA. Project manager for analysis of impacts of reduced inflows to the Tulare Lakebed from flood storage options in Lake Kaweah. Estimated populations of waterfowl and shorebirds inhabiting the Tulare Lakebed; determined habitat requirements/limiting factors for over-wintering and breeding populations; and analyzed use-patterns and bird densities in the lakebed. Habitat impacts were determined using projected decreases in flood duration, area inundated, and depth of flooding in the lakebed. · Member, The Wildlife Society · Member, Society of Wetland Scientists · Member, National Military Fish and Wildlife Associati(~n · Board of Directors, Biological Field Studies Association 5 dre Resume P...a°°~,.,... ,-. Sarah C. Powell Staff Biologist EDUCATION: B.S. Environmental Biology; minor in Computer Information Systems, Humboldt State University, 2000. EXPERIENCE Ms. Powell joined Padre Associates, Inc. in 2000 as an Environmental Analyst. She is part of the biological team at Padre and is responsible for conducting sensitive plant surveys, wetland delineations, vegetation mapping and monitoring, ecological analysis, and regulatory, compliance. RELEVANT PROJECTS I Examples of Ms. Powell's experience include the following projects: Vegetation Monitoring of Mitigation Sites on Altamont Pass Road, Livermore, California For Alameda County Public Works Agency Ms. Powell has conducted annual vegetation monitoring for several years on four mitigation sites at the Altamont Pass Road Realignment Project Site. The monitoring consists of tree surveys, herbaceous plant sampling, and preparing monitoring reports. Ms. Powell has coordinated, and supervised supplemental tree plantings in December of 2002. Vegetation Monitoring of Crow Creek, Alameda County, California For Alameda County Public Works Agency Ms. Powell has conducted the annual vegetation monitoring for several years at a slope stabilization project site on Crow Creek in Castro Valley. This project entails an assessment of the growth and condition of trees and shrubs, and a measurement of percent coverage of native herbaceous vegetation. She recently worked closely with Alameda County 'staff to develop and implement new monitoring methods to account for modifications to the original planting site. Vegetation Monitoring of Agua Caliente, Alameda County, California For Alameda County Public Works Agency Ms. Powell has conducted the annual vegetation monitoring for several years at the Agua Caliente Creek Erosion Control Project in Fremont. The monitoring involves the mapping of trees and shrubs using a GPS unit capable of real-time sub-meter accuracy. Surveys are conducted to determine the location of each plant and to ascertain data concerning survival, growth, and condition (health and vitality) of the plants. This information is used to generate a map that tracks the success of the mitigation plantings and if necessary is analyzed to identify areas where replanting is necessary. Zone 6 Line G Flood Control Channel Improvement Project, Alameda County, California For Alameda County Public Works Agency Ms. Powell prepared the Mitigation Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the Zone 6 Line G Flood Control Project in Fremont. She has since conducted the Year-0 (as-built) monitoring of plant installation and the first year of vegetation monitoring in 2002. Vegetation monitoring consists of mapping each of the trees and shrubs using a GPS unit, and collecting percent cover data along 10 transects throughout the project reach to determine the success of herbaceous vegetation. She is currently conducting the Year-2 (2003) vegetation monitoring on the site. Resume dre Wetland Assessment for the Proposed Zone 3A Line D Desilting Project For Alameda County Public Works Agency Ms. Powell conducted a delineation of wetlands adjacent to the Zone 3A Line D flood control channel. This included a thorough analysis of the local hydrology to make a wetland determination. Wetland areas were flagged in the field, mapped using a GPS unit, and total wetland acreage was calculated. Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project, Livermore, California For Alameda County Public Works Agency Ms. Powell conducted field surveys for the Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project in Alameda County. The surveys included a tree survey in which trees were tagged and the size and health of each species was assessed. Ms. Powell conducted a rare plant survey on the project site in which transects were walked through the project site in search of three rare plant species with recorded occurrences in the area. Ms. pOwell also participated in surveys for listed fairy shrimp species in vernal pools within the project area. Wetland Delineation at Lake Elizabeth, Fremont, California For Alameda County Public Works Agency Ms. Powell conducted a wetland delineation of a dredge spoil disposal site at Lake Elizabeth in Fremont. The delineation verified that the disposal of dredge spoils on the site would not adversely affect wetlands in the area. Upon completion, a report was prepared outlining the boundaries of the disposal site in order to avoid wetlands. Ms. Powell assembled permit applications necessary for regulatory compliance prior to beginning the project. Ms. Powell later conducted an additional delineation and amended the previously prepared report to include additional disposal sites for permanent disposal of dredge spoils. Wetland Delineation and Regulatory Services for the Marin County Airport Levee Reconstruction Project, Novato, California For RC Fuller Associates Ms. Powell conducted a wetland delineation at the Marin County Airport to quantify the impacts for three culvert installationS and a levee reconstruction project. Ms. Powell accompanied the Corps to the site for verification and is currently working on modifications to the delineation. She has compiled a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) in support of the project activities. Once the delineation verification is complete the JARPA will be submitted to the agencies for approval. Biological Characterization Of The Sportsmen Yacht Club Harbor, Antioch, California For Sportsmen Yacht Club Ms. Powell conducted habitat level surveys for the Sportsmen's Yacht Club in the San Joaquin Delta as a condition of the Streambed Alteration Agreement. Surveys included an assessment of the potential for black rail, giant garter snake, delta smelt, Sacramento splittail, and western pond turtle to occur within the proposed dredging project area. She prepared a report detailing the results of the surveys for submittal to CDFG. Resume adre P~;soolite*, Inc. TRAINING PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS California Environmental Quality Act Class, U.C. Davis Extension Program, September 2000. CDFG Programs: California Endangered Species Act and Streambed Alteration Agreements, U.C. Davis Extension Program, November 2000. Wetland Delineation Class, Wetland Training Institute, March 2001. Pine Hill Endemic Plant Species lecture and field trip, California Native Plant Society, May 2001. Member, The California Native Plant Society Member, U.C. Davis Botanical Society Member, Society of Wetland Scientists Resume Simon A. Poulter Principal ~ ¢3 a ~ I1 . ENGINEER~, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAl. SCIENTISTS EDUCATION: EXPERIENCE: M.R.P. Environmental Planning, University of Pennsylvania, 1985 B.A. Marine/Aquatic Biology and Physical Geography, Wittenberg University, 1980 Mr. Poulter has over 20 years of experience as a project manager and environmental scientist responsible for the preparation of physical, biological, and cultural resource assessments for inland, coastal, and outer continental shelf projects. Mr. Poulter has extensive experience with the development of permitting strategies, permit acquisition and permit condition compliance for coastal projects. Mr. Poulter is a Principal of Padre Associates, Inc. and currently manages the firm's Environmental Sciences group. In this role he is responsible for supervising day to day operations of the group including marketing, contract administration, staffing, quality assurance, cost control, and scheduling of ongoing projects. Mr. Poulter's experience includes the preparation of numerous environmental impact reports (EINEIR/EIS), resource assessment studies, and environmental training programs for projects within the western United States, as well as several international projects. Mr. Poulter has extensive experience in the preparation and implementation of permits associated with development and restoration projects. Mr. Poulter has also directed environment assessment documentation mandated under both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). SLich documentation has included environmental assessments for large water and wastewater facilities in southern and central California and expansion of naval facilities throughout California, Washington and Alaska. Mr. Poulter recently supervised the preparation of a comprehensive EIR for the construction of a regional brine disposal pipeline as well as the retrofit and upgrade of water storage and transmission systems. Currently Mr. Poulter is supervising the review of a coastal septic to sewer upgrade project in Santa Barbara County that is designed to reduce septic tank impacts on coastal water quality. His recent experience includes environmental impact assessment and permitting for abandonment of offshore platforms and associated pipeline in California. Permitting efforts include State Lands Commission, Coastal Commission (Coastal Development Permit), Minerals Management Service Army Corps of Engineers (404 Permit), Regional Water Quality Control Board (401 Permit), and California Department of Fish and Game (Explosives Permit and Artificial Reef Permit). Such permitting efforts have included close coordination with other responsible agencies, including Regional Air Quality Control District, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the State Office of Historic Preservation. Resume PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: adre Pa;~o¢iate~, inc. ENGINEERE, GEOLOGISTE & [] ENVIRONMENTAL ~CIF. N'I1ST~ Previously, Mr. Poulter was the Program Manager for Resources management Service at Fugro West for 6 years prior to establishing Padre Associates, Inc. In addition, he worked for 8 years as an environmental coordinator, project manager, and computer mapping coordinator for a firm concentrating on assessment of environmental impacts, oil spill contingency planning and training for programs for offshore and onshore oil and gas exploration and development. Project areas included the Beaufort Sea, North Slope, Bering ,Sea, and Cook Inlet in Alaska, the Santa Maria Basin, and Santa Barbara Channel of California. Mr. Poulter's areas of concentration have included the mapping of physical, biological, and cultural resource areas along much of the California and Alaskan coastline, as well as documentation and assessment of the effects of oil and chemical spills on these resources. Mr. Poulter participated in the preparation of the shoreline cleanup plan for the 1990 oil spill at Huntington Beach, California, as well as documentation of environmental impacts associated with the Valdez oil spill. Mr. Poulter has also designed and implemented oil spill response strategies and training programs for oil spills in remote tropical regions. City of Carpinteria, Former Chairman Planning Commission Former Member Carpinteria Salt Marsh Technical and Steering Committee Former Chairmen, City of Carpinteria General Plan and Local Coastal Plan Update Committee Western States Petroleum Association - Associates Representative National Association of Environmental Professionals - Board Member - 2 - May 04 Resume · adre Psmoclates, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST8 Kris A. Vardas Project Manager/Environmental Planner EDUCATION: QUALIFICATIONS: SKILLS: PADRE ASSOCIATES Present M.B.A. Business Administration, California State University, Sacramento, 1998 B.S. Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning, University of California, Davis, 1990 Project Manager, Planning, and Environmental Specialist Mr. Vardas' work focuses on environmental impact assessment and permitting. As a project manager and environmental planner, Mr. Vardas interfaces with. public agency and applicant representatives, and coordinates project work. He maintains day-to-day involvement with the projects he is involved with by actively preparing reports and applications, and reviewing supporting materials prepared by the team. Mr. Vardas has been involved in several phases of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process from the preparation of initial studies through findings and mitigation monitoring plans. He has assisted in the preparation of several environmental documents. Mr. Vardas' permitting experience includes water, oil and gas and infrastructure Projects in environmentally-sensitive settings. He has been involved in the permitting process for projects with multi-agency involvement including the California Coastal Commission, State Lands Commission, California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Air Pollution Control Districts, and City and County governments. In association with many of the permitting projects he assists in managing, he is also responsible for coordination of environmental monitoring associated with environmental conditions incorporated into project work plans and imposed as permit conditions. Mr. Vardas has assisted in a variety of related biological studies and surveys, including sycamore, kit fox den surveys, giant kangaroo rat, blunt- nosed leopard lizard, and wetland delineations. North Sonoma County Agricultural Reuse Project. Mr. Vardas is serving as project manager for preparation of an EIR/EIS for the North Sonoma County Agricultural Reuse Project. This project involves developing the infrastructure (pipelines, pumping plants, and reservoirs) to store and distribute recycled water to approximately 21,000 acres of agricultural land in the Russian River, Alexander, and Dry Creek Valleys. Primary issues include impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, land use, and other issues. The project also involves coordination with Resume adre P;soclates, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL 8CIENTIST8 various agencies, including the US Bureau of Reclamation. Plains Exploration and Production EIR. Mr. Vardas served as project manager for the preparation of an EIR for the Phase IV Development Plan of the Price Canyon Oil Field. Morro Bay State Park Marina Enhancement Plan EIR/EIS. Mr. Vardas is serving as project manager for preparation of an EIPJEIS for a proposed expansion, and enhancement of the Morro Bay State Park Marina. Primary issues include water quality and biological resource impacts, sediment analysis, dredging, bathymetry, and cultural resources. The project is being executed in three phases: (1) Project Refinement and Alternatives Development; (2) EIPJEIS preparation; and (3) Permitting. The project will requirement numerous federal, State, and local permits. Biorn Asphalt Plant and CUP EIR. Mr. Vardas is serving' as project manager for the preparation of an EIR for a proposed asphalt plant and general plan amendment. The project site is just north of the Santa Maria River, adjacent to Highway 101. Dove Creek Mixed-Use Development IS/MND. Mr. Vardas served as project manager for preparation of an IS/MND for a proposed 282- residential unit and 60,000 sq-ft of commercial use for the City of Atascadero. Primary issues include impacts to biological resources, aesthetics, cultural resources, and traffic/circulation. West Front Villages ISlMND. Mr. Vardas served as project manager for preparation of an IS/MND for a proposed residential homes, 90-room hotel, gasoline station, and commercial space mixed-use development for the City of Atascadero. Primary issues include impacts to air quality, biological resources, aesthetics, historical resources, public services, and traffic/circulation. New Bishop Water Storage Tank ISlMND. Mr. Vardas is preparing an MND for and providing permitting assistance to the City of San Luis Obispo for the construction of a 750,000 gallon water storage tank. The project required preparation of an extensive visual resources analysis involving analysis of alternative tank locations and photo simulations of the new tank. Grant Joint Union High School District EIR. Mr. Vardas is preparing an EIR for a proposed high school/middle school to be constructed in north of downtown Sacramento. The project includes various administrative buildings, classrooms, sport fields, and a stadium. Key issues include aesthetics, biological resources, noise, public services, and transportation/circulation. Burton School District ISIMND. Mr. Vardas is preparing an IS/MND for a proposed middle school to be constructed adjacent to the City of Porterville. Resume adre ~assoclates, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENI'I~T8 California State Lands Commission July 1999 - November 2002 The project includes administrative buildings, classrooms, and sport fields. Key issues include noise, public services, and transportation/circulation. Pixley Union School District IS/MND. Mr. Vardas is preparing an IS/MND for a proposed high school to be constructed in the community of Pixley. The project includes administrative buildings, classrooms, and sport fields. Key issues include noise, public services, and transportation/circulation. San Ardo Produced Water Management System. Mr. Vardas assisted in environmental compliance and permitting services for the San Ardo Produced Water Management System. This project is being sponsored by ChevronTexaco and involves developing a system to enable treatment of produced water for recharge into the Salinas Groundwater Basin. Estero Marine Terminal Desalination Plant Project. Mr. Vardas is providing permitting guidance and assistance for construction of a desalination plant at Estero Bay. El Pomar-Estrella EIR. Mr. Vardas assisted in preparation of several sections of the El Pomar-Estrella Area Plan Update EIR. ABCSD Marine Outfall and Repair Extension Project. Mr. Vardas assisted in the preparation of a Marine Wildlife Contingency Plan for the project. Crystal Energy LNG Facility. Mr. Vardas is providing permitting and environmental compliance to allow an existing oil and gas platform off the coast of Ventura County to be retrofitted as a liquid natural gas terminal. This project involves compliance with federal, State, and local agencies. SCE Catalina Island Power Cable Project. Mr. Vardas is providing assistance in environmental compliance and permitting for the SCE Catalina Island Power Cable Project, which involves installing a power cable from Huntington Beach, across the San Pedro Channel, to Avalon, Catalina Island. This project will enable the island to discontinue power production via diesel generators. Carone Petroleum Oil Field Development Project. Mr. Vardas served as State project manager in preparing a draft CEQA document for horizontal drilling from Platform Hogan (federal waters) into State waters. CSLC Project Management Office. Mr. Vardas helped develop a Project Management Office to ensure the successful execution of internal projects to improve operations. This entailed developing an agency-wide strategiC plan, tactical plan, operations plans, records management plan, feasibility study reports, business case, project management procedures and processes, and detailed requirements documents. Resume adre Pssociates, inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS & [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST8 California Department of Water Resources June 1992 - July 1992 AT&T NEX/CORE Fiber Optic Cable Project. Mr. Vardas served as State project manager for preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for installation of a fiber optic cable in several counties in California, consultations with the California Department of Fish and Game and US Fish and Wildlife Service, and permitting. He also oversaw the preparation and execution of a mitigation monitoring program for the project. Lower Owens River Project. Mr. Vardas represented the California State Lands Commission in an initiative involving multiple agencies and interest groups to restore a 60-mile stretch of the Lower Owens River Project. He helped prepare and review supporting materials for the EIR/EIS and performed associated activities. Lower American River Fish Group. Mr. Vardas represented the California State Lands Commission in developing a plan to restore and improve aquatic habitat for the lower American River. Environmental Review. Mr. Vardas performed review and environmental compliance and monitoring work for a large number of EIRs/EIS, MNDs, NDs and feasibility studies. Kern Fan Element EIR. Mr. Vardas prepared sections of an EIR for a project to develop a groundwater recharge and extraction bank in Kern County. He also assisted in the preparation of a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) to meet additional mitigation bank project goals. Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins Comprehensive Study. Mr. Vardas served as project manager for development of a Geographic Information System to assist in mapping and modeling of hydrologic and hydraulic, riparian, agriculture, infrastructure, and land use of the Central Valley. Merced River Restoration Project. Mr. Vardas oversaw the preparation of a mitigated negative declaration and environmental assessment and subsequent permitting for a project to restore a reach of the Merced River for Chinook Salmon. Delta Land Management. Mr. Vardas performed various land management activities on behalf of the Department for properties owned in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This work involved monitoring encroachments, conducting environmental assessments, and coordinating compliance activities. San Bernardino Intake Tower Reconstruction Project. Mr. Vardas prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a project to reconstruct an intake tower at Silverwood Lake in the San Bernardino Mountains. He also prepared a biological assessment for the project and coordinated with the California Department of Fish & Game and the US Fish & Wildlife Service. Resume adre Pi~sociate., inc. ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS A [] ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTI8TS Coastal Branch Phase-II Pipeline. Mr. Vardas prepared sections of an Environmental Impact Report for the construction of a pipeline to convey water to San Luis Obispo County and Santa Barbara County. Mr. Vardas obtained permits, and assisted in the development and execution of a mitigation monitoring program for the project. Pyramid Lake Dam Emergency Spillway Repair Project. Mr. Vardas prepared the necessary CEQA document and obtain the required permits to allow repair of the emergency spillway of the Pyramid Lake Dam. UC Davis Planning (Volunteer Position) Long Range Development Plan EIR. Mr. Vardas assisted the University in developing a mitigation monitoring program in support of its long-range development plan. He coordinated with various departments within the campus. RV Crago Research Vessel/Program (Volunteer Position) RV Crago Research Vessel. Mr. Vardas conducted various water quality and biological sampling techniques and taught these techniques to students throughout Contra Costa County. SU PPLEM ENTARY IN FORMATION: Mr. Vardas engages in continuing education in the fields of environmental permitting, planning and special environmental topics by attending courses offered through the University of California (U.C.), Los Angeles Public Policy Program, U.C. Davis Extension, and other professional skills enhancement programs. He also continues his service to the community through volunteer work, including as a Planning Commissioner for the City of Pismo Beach and participation on the Pismo Creek Watershed Committee. APPENDIX C Padre Insurance Certificate 83/18/2885 15:45 885-644,2858 'PADRE. ASSOCIATES Fr~m: C~emrino VVeb~t~r At-Dlverm'l~ed ITr~klnaumn~ .Orulmr-a FaxlD: C~,erstlle0 I~s~ In~ To: Annette Vetoer · PAGE '82 O~te:0~/~8~2005 D~.42AM Page: ~ of 2 I. . PAD~ ,..., . . ACORD., CE FICAT OF L iLI~ iNsURANCE .=...u~-- ' :'- ' ' ,, - .. ., ....... . .... .. Div~ified Risk in.utahc~ emk~ (5~0) ~47~20~ - ' THIS C~RTIFlCATE 181~SUF. D'A5 A-MATTER OF INFORMATION , ONLY. AND-CO. !~CERS ,.NO .RIGHTS .UPON THE CERTIFICATE 5900 Christie' Avenue -. ALT'E~R'THE COVERAGE_ AFFORDED BY THE:PDI~3E~ BELOw. Emeryville, CA '94~0~ ' - · tNSUeERsAFFORO;N~COVERA;E 'tUUC~ ~, PaGi-~ A~oc;~'~,,~,,' Inc. ' ' ~U~'A~ Haird Fire Insurance '~:~. · !86t Knoll DriVe . ,,~i~a: .Hadford. C~Ual~.lns.. - . . .: . ... ~ D:_ ' : , ,.. ' ' ,-. '''~'~: 'i ...... 'THE'POUclF-8 OF JNSURANOE. LL~ cu.BELOW~HAVE BL~ ISSUED TOTHE~ISUREDNAMEOABOVEFoR THE POLICY. P£RIOD.t~IGA'~Eo..~ANDING '" ANY REQLI~R EMmeT, TER~ OR.GoHomoI~.OF,~AIY OONTRACT oR.O11~R DoCUYEN'rwr~ RESP~.~.WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE:MAY tU~*I~IUED.OR · ~YPERTN~ THE '~m-a~C~.~R~:~'~S'~~'~e~-~.~'~t~j~rTO ALL~:'r~u~. EXCLuS~oe~s:~ · '--'~"'"~.~ ' .... ~ ~,~-.,.~'~.. ".~' . .. ' ~'~G,d,~-~ Ir-,,,c,,~,,'e*:~).-' · ' ~ ' '"' ' ' . - ~.,~=,/ · ' PRO-" ~." · · · .. .. __ . ~r~y.~ ,., ,,,, '~u,~u'n, ." ' ' ',~o~,r:,~=e,~r'. ~: · : . . , . .... . .-.:...- .~:.~:. $..~.'. .. ., ' . . . .. . , .,~.......O,~L..X.:.: . ...,?. ., · _ . ... . ~ . .: . ' : . ~ ~ ' ,". -. . . . ._ ~ ~ - . · ~ ' .. '-- ~:~~~~ · .. · ,. '"'1, * "~.,~ ff~m~.~- .-: · - ' .... - .... ~ . . . - .. ' . . ~' · . . . .. ~ . . . . . ~ ' . . . . . . . -. ; . . ~ · . . · . · . :. .r · . · , ..-..... ' . · ............. .. Terra Insurance ComPany (A Risk Retention Group) Two-Fifer Avenue, Suite 1 O0 Corte Madera CA 94925 DATE 01/01/05 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ,IL IIIEK ~'TKIITIOI~ GX'GUP NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED Padre Associates, Inc. 101'2 Pacific Street, Suite A san Luis Obispo, CA 9340'1 This certifies that .the insurance' poliCy (described beloW by a policy number) Written on forms in' use by theCOmpany.has been.iSsued.. This certificate is' not a PoliCy-or. a binder of ihSurance and does not alter, amend or extend the"coverage afforded b'Y that policy. NotwithStanding any requirement, term or. condition of any contraCt .or other document to WhiCh this certificate may pe'rtain;, the insurance afforded by'the policy is SUbject to all of its terms, eXclusions and conditions. TYPE O F I N S'U RAN C E Professional/Environmental Liability POLICY NUMBER 205159 EFFECTIVE DATE 01/01/05 EXPIRATION DATE · 12/31/05 LIMITS OF LIABILITY $1,000,000 EACH CLAIM $1,000,000--ANNUAL AGGREGATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION None SpeCified CANCELLATION If the described policy is cancelled,lmaterially alteredor Changed'~bY the C°mpany before its expiration .date, th6C0mpany Wii! imai! .written notice to the... certificate holder 'thirty (30) days in advance, or ten '(10) days in adYancefor non-' i' payment .of Premium; Ift'he deSCri:b'ed ipoliCy is cancelled by the]nsUred before .its expiration date, the Company Will .mail 'written notice tO the'certificate hOlder 'within thirty (30).days of the notice to the company from' the inSured. '- CERTIFICATE HOLDER This is a specimen Certificate of insurance~ If yOu requi~e"a true certificate of insurance, please contact Terra Insurance Company. ISSUI'NG COMPANY: TERM i. NSURANCE COMPANY (A Risk Keten~i°n Group) pres. identl . C~ty of U kiah Or:char venue~Extens~on ' :..i'.'~ i ~-'fi:Alte~ ' e RO na September 27, 2005 Mr. Charley Stump, Director Planning and Community Development 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Subject: Proposal for the Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Study Dear Mr. Stump: Scheidegger & Associates is pleased to provide three copies of our proposal to prepare the Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Study. We understand the importance of the study to the City and have prepared this proposal mindful of the need to provide a solid technical approach with the necessary technical expertise, which will produce a cost-effective Alternative Rome Analysis Study in a timely manner. Our preliminary work program, including schedule and cost estimate, is included in section 1. Section 2 presents our project organization and key personnel, while Section 3 includes our related experience with resumes. A select group of highly qualified subcontractors, experienced in the Ukiah area, has been assembled to address key environmental issues. Our subconsultants include Abrams Associates (traffic), Environmental Collaborative (biology), Illingworth & Rodkin (noise), and Archeo-Tec (archaeology). We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to a favorable review. Please call me at (925) 210-2271 if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Paul Scheidegger PAS:di Enclosures En.viro n t~e nra/Pla n n lng a nd Impact dn al?is P.O. Box 331, Danvil.ie, CA 94526 , (925) 820-9757 · (925)62 ~ C)-7996. (n~'c)° TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Preliminary Work Program Section 2. Project Organization and Key Personnel Section 3. Related Experience 09/26/05,q. Jkiatt/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai SECTION 1 PRELIMINARY WORK PROGRAM The City of Ukiah (City) September 8, 2005, Request for Proposal (RFP) is for preparation of an alternative route analysis study for the Orchard Avenue extension project. This section of our proposal provides an overview of our understanding of the project, key elements of our approach, and a presentation of our preliminary work program, including task descriptions, schedule, and cost estimate. Project Understanding A series of environmental documents has been prepared on the Orchard Avenue extension project. In 1999, a Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared on a project that was similar to that currently envisioned but the EIR was never certified by the City because of uncertainties over how a 95-acre area just to the north would be developed. Later, in 2002, the City had the original EIR revised and updated to reflect the revised scope of project improvements in the context of an updated environmental setting. The 2002 EIR was not certified until 2004 following preparation of an EIR Addendum, which addressed changed development assumptions in the 95-acre area to the north. Following certification by the City of the latest EIR, the EIR was legally challenged. The current California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents support a northerly extension of Orchard Avenue from Ford Street to Brush Street, with a bridge at Orr Creek, various access improvements, new and replaced water lines, and a new storm drainage system south of Brush Street. Stemming from the lawsuit, the City is proposing to evaluate an alternative alignment for extension of Orchard Avenue, which includes a new location for the Orr Creek bridge. The new road alignment would be to the east of the current design alignment, has two options for its southerly segment, and would function as a frontage road bordering Highway 101. 09/26/05/Ukiatv'Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 1-2 As indicated in the RFP, the City desires to have an objective environmental analysis performed of the alternative Orchard Avenue alignment and creek crossing pursuant to the standards of CEQA. Specifically, the purpose of the alternative route analysis study is to determine if the alternative route is environmentally superior to the proposed route or if it would cause impacts that the current project would not. Equally important is a determination of whether the alternative route is a feasible alternative. Based on the findings of the alternative route analysis, the City will determine if another CEQA document (Addendum, Supplemental, or Subsequent EIR) should be prepared. Key Elements of Approach Our approach to the alternative route analysis will be objective and unencumbered by previous association on the project and any outside influences. Our team will focus on the direct impacts of the alternative road alignment with the assumption that the previous assessment of growth-inducing impacts is adequate and would not change due to the alternative alignment. The report that will be produced will be easily adaptable to the appropriate CEQA document the City may choose to have prepared. The basic approach will be to briefly summarize the impact of a given issue associated with the proposed route, provide the analysis associated with the alternative route, and state the conclusion. As discussed in Section 2 of this proposal, our project team has the necessary expertise to address the issues at hand. The 2002 Draft EIR and 2004 Addendum will be important sources of information. Confirmation will be needed on existing land use and any future projects in the area. Supplemental data base searches and biological and cultural resource surveys will be conducted of the alternative road alignment, and some limited noise modeling will be performed. The traffic analysis will focus on roadway geometrics. To assure success of our study efforts, we will work closely with the City's Planning and Community Development and Public Works/Engineering Departments throughout all phases of the work. 09/26/05/UkiahJOrchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 1-3 Task Descriptions Our preliminary work program is composed of nine tasks. Tasks 1 to 7 are associated with preparation of the alternative route analysis study, while Tasks 8 and 9 are optional and would be dependent on whether a CEQA document is prepared, as well as the type of document. The work program is preliminary and we would welcome input from the City to assure your needs and expectations are met. Task 1. Project Management · Work, schedule, and cost control. · Execution of subcontracts. · Invoicing. · Coordination with City. · Distribution of resource materials to project team. · Develop report outline of the alternative alignment analysis study and submit to City for review. Assumption · Level of effort dependent on maintenance of schedule. Task 2. Alternative Description and General Environmental · Verification that the alternative alignment is a reasonable alternative under CEQA. · Obtain and review descriptive and supporting information from the City on the alternative alignment and creek crossing. · Conduct a site visit to review proposed and alternative alignment. · Prepare a description of the alternative alignment for the report. 09/26/05/UkiabdOrchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 1-4 Review the 2002 Draft EIR, summarize impacts of selected issue areas for proposal alignment. Document existing land use and any future projects in vicinity of alternative alignment. Provide a general assessment of impact.s of the alternative alignment and compare to proposed alignment. Assumptions · City to provide information. available alternative alignment des4riptive and supporting City to provide information on future projects. City to provide aerial maps of project area. Permission for site access to be Obtained by City. Task 3. Traffic Obtain and review traffic impact analysis for the proposed alignment. Based on this analysis, assign traffic volume forecasts to the alternative alignment. Evaluate the differences in roadway capacity impacts, traffic safety, operating speeds, and travel time and distance comparisons. Roadway geometrics and curvature will be assessed for the alternative alignment, including the two options for the southerly segment. Assess the compatibility of the alternative alignment with future hook ramps at Brush Street and Highway 101. Assess the potential effects of the alternative alignment on the local street network. 09/26/05t~Ukiah/Orchard Avenuc Extension Study/Iai 1-5 Summarize the findings of the 2002 Draft EIR relative to traffic impacts. Discuss potential impacts of the alternative alignment and compare to the proposed project. Assumptions · Traffic analysis will focus primarily on roadway geometrics. · No new traffic count data or projections to be developed; information in 2002 Draft EIR assumed to be valid. Task 4. Biological Resources · Collect and review existing information on biotic resources in the project vicinity, including the 2002 Draft EIR; the biotic report prepared by Charlie Patterson; other published documents covering the project area and vicinity; the City and County; the California Natural Divei-sity Database and National Wetland Inventory; and the California Department of Fish and Game and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service as appropriate. Sensitive resources in the project area will be identified, particularly with regard to anadromous fish species, northern red- legged frog, foothill yellow-legged frog, and other special-status taxa. · Conduct a field reconnaissance of the alternative alignment. The survey will serve to identify vegetation types, wildlife habitat, and prominent biological features, including the number of trees affected by the Orr Creek crossing. · Prepare a brief technical report as an appendix to the alternative alignment study. The report will identify vegetation types, wildlife habitat, potential for special- status species, and any other important biotic features. · For the alternative alignment analysis report, summarize the findings of the 2002 Draft EIR relative to the biological impacts and mitigation measures of the 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 1-6 proposed alignment, the potential impacts and mitigation measures of the alternative alignment, and a relative comparison of the two alignments. Assumptions · City to provide copy of biotic report prepared by Charlie Patterson. · The alternative alignment encompasses an area of land about IA mile long and 75 feet wide. · Permission for site access to be provided by the City. · Field effort will be limited to a one-day reconnaissance to determine the potential for any sensitive resources and need for any supplemental detailed surveys, which are not included in this scope of work. Based on our preliminary review, detailed field surveys of the alternative alignment should not be necessary. · Detailed mapping or inventory is not included in this scope of work. Task 5. Noise Review noise assessment in 2002 Draft EIR. Using the same approach utilized for the proposed alignment, conduct noise modeling of the alternative alignment using Caltrans traffic noise prediction model CEQV2. Assess noise construction impacts of the alternative alignment. Summarize the findings from the 2002 Draft EIR, identify potential impacts and mitigation measures of the alternative alignment, and compare the two alignments. 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenuc Extension Study/Iai 1-7 Assumption · Use the same assumptions and methodology contained in the 2002 Draft EIR. Task 6. Archaeology · Conduct a focused program of archival research at the Northwest Information Center. · Conduct an archaeological field reconnaissance of the alternative alignment area. · Record previously unidentified cultural resources according to appropriate standards. · Compile an appropriately detailed written report. · For the alternative route analysis report, summarize the findings of the 2002 Draft EIR relative to archaeological resources, the potential impacts and mitigation measures of the alternative alignment, and a comparison of the two alignments. Assumptions · Permission for site access to be obtained by City. · The alternative alignment encompasses an area of land about IA mile long and 75 feet wide. Task 7. Report Preparation Assemble report and submit to City for review. Revise report based on review comments. Assumptions · Three copies of report to be submitted. 09/26/05/TJkiah./Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 1-8 One consolidated set of comments to be provided by the City. No further environmental documentation to be prepared. Task 8. CEQA Document (Optional) · Coordinate with City on preferred CEQA document to be prepared (Addendum, Supplemental, or Subsequent EIR). · Modify report from Task 7 appropriately. · Submit to City for review. · Revise report based on review comments. · Reproduce report and assist City with distribution (Supplemental or Subsequent EIR). Assumptions · No additional surveys or special studies required to create CEQA document. · One consolidated set of comments to be provided by the City. · Thirty copies of CEQA document to be produced (Supplemental or Subsequent EIR). · No distribution if EIR Addendum is prepared. Task 9. Respond to Comments (Optional) · Obtain and review comments with the City. · Prepare draft responses for City review. 09/26/05AJkialv'Orchard Avenue Extension Study/iai 1-9 Finalize responses and submit to City. Attend City Council hearing. Assumptions · Task necessary only if Supplemental or Subsequent EIR prepared. · Few comments are received and responses do not require new studies or . substantial efforts to address. · One City Council hearing. Schedule A draft report for the alternative route analysis study can be submitted to the City for review within 30 days after authorization to proceed. If an EIR addendum was chosen by the City to be the preferred approach, for CEQA compliance, this requires about 1 week to produce. Either a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR would require public notice and review, and the process would require up to 2 months to complete. Cost Estimate The cost estimate for our project team is presented in Table 1-1. As indicated in the table, the estimated cost to complete the alternative route analysis study (Tasks 1-7) is $19,990. If the City chooses to have either a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR prepared, the cost would increase to $27,700. 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai SECTION 2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND KEY PERSONNEL Scheidegger & Associates has assembled an experienced team for the Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis project. Our project team's established working relationships, technical strengths, experience, and commitment will ensure the alternative route analysis will meet the City of Ukiah's needs. Our team's 'organization structure is shown on Figure 2-1. Scheidegger & Associates, based in Danville, will serve as prime contractor and preparation of the alternative route analysis study will be managed by Mr. Paul Scheidegger. Mr. Scheidegger has a long-standing working relationship with our proposed subconsultants, including Abrams Associates for traffic, Environmental Collaborative for biology, Illingworth & Rodkin for noise, and Archeo-Tec for archaeology. Experience overviews of our project team are provided below while further information on related project experience and individual qualifications is included in Section 3. Scheidegger & Associates Mr. Paul Scheidegger formed Scheidegger & Associates in 1997 and has more than 30 years of experience in preparing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation on projects. Scheidegger & Associates provides environmental planning services to private industry and local, state, and federal agencies. Mr. Scheidegger'has prepared and managed numerous studies, including siting studies and CEQA documents (Initial Studies and EIRs) on a wide variety of planning, public works, and waste management projects. He regularly assists agencies on CEQA compliance and integration of environmental planning and permit requirements into project development. Mr. Scheidegger recently completed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the City of Ukiah Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project. 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 2-2 Paul Scheidegger I Alternative Description Scheidegger &Associates General Environmental Traffic Abrams Associates Biology Environmental Collaborative Noise Illingworth & Rodkin Archaeology Archeo-Tec Figure 2-1 Project Team Organization 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 2-3 Abrams Associates Abrams Associates is a Walnut Creek, California based consulting firm specializing in traffic engineering and transportatiOn planning. The firm was founded in 1985 by Charles M. Abrams, and has successfully completed hundreds of traffic and transportation projects--many of them large, complex, and controversial. The firm has become well known for the ability of its professionals to make the traffic engineering and transportation planning process a practical one by using their skills to guide projects through environmental and other regulatory reviews to timely implementation. Abrams Associates is currently conducting traffic impact studies in the northern Ukiah area. The traffic impact analysis for the alternative alignment will be completed by Mr. Stephen Abrams, vice president of Abrams Associates. Mr. Adams has 16 years of experience in the fields of traffic engineering and transportation planning. Environmental Collaborative Environmental Collaborative is a small business enterprise located in Emeryville, California. Established in 1983 by James A. Martin, the firm provides professional environmental consulting and research services to the public and private sectors throughout California. Services provided by the firm include: environmental analyses and field surveys, environmental documentation and report preparation, and natural resource management. Mr. Martin has considerable experience conducting assessments for sites throughout Mendocino and Sonoma counties and the north Bay Area. He is currently working with staff of Sonoma County and Marin County serving as the consulting biologist as they prepare their General Plan updates. Recent development projects he has been involved with in the Ukiah and Sonoma County vicinity include: the Ukiah Water Storage Expansion Project for the Ukiah Utility District; the Cloverdale Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion and the Asti Resort Project in Cloverdale; the Sonoma Country Inn project near Kenwood; the South Sonoma Business Park and the West Sierra Residential project in Cotati; and the Redwood Technology Center and the South Petaluma River Specific Plan projects in Petaluma. 09/26,'05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/lal 2-4 Illingworth & Rodkin Illingworth & Rodkin will be responsible for the noise assessment. The firm prepared the noise assessment for the proposed alignment in the 2002 Draft EIR. Founded in 1987, the firm has completed more than 1,000 projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, other areas of California, and the western states. Mr. Richard Rodkin will conduct the updated noise assessment for the alternative alignment. Mr. Illingworth is a principal with the firm and specializes in environmental noise assessment and has prepared noise sections for more than 500 projects. He has been preparing environmental studies for more than 35 years and is currently managing an on-call consulting services statewide contract with Caltrans using the latest approved FHA traffic noise model. Archeo-Tec Archeo-Tec is a cultural resources management consulting firm based in Oakland, California. Founded in 1977, the company has grown into one of the most experienced and professionally capable firms of its kind in northern California. Archeo-Tec has' extensive expertise in the evaluation of both prehistoric and historic period cultural resources throughout California, with an emphasis on the northern half of the state. To date, Archeo-Tec has successfully completed more than 100 major projects in both urban and rural settings. This work has entailed field investigations, laboratory analysis, detailed library research, significance assessments, and the preparation of complex reports and publications. For this project, the firm's work efforts will be supervised by Allan Pastron, principal of the firm. Archeo-Tec provided the cultural resource assessment for the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project. 09/26/05POkiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai SECTION 3 RELATED EXPERIENCE The scope of the City of Ukiah (City) Orchard Avenue Extension Alternative Route Analysis Study is well defined, stemming from a proposed settlement of a lawsuit challenging the recently certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Based on our review of the September 8 Request for Proposal (RFP), a review of the previous environmental documentation, and conversations with City staff, we believe the following are key considerations for conduct, of the work effort: Ability to conduct an objective environmental analysis Proven ability to work effectively with the City on previous projects Ability to efficiently use the existing database to meet the needs of the study Use of experienced technical specialists to address key issue areas to provide the necessary documentation and credibility of the analysis Ability to utilize and organize the information to meet the needs of the study, as well as any follow-on California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document the City may wish to have prepared As discussed in Section 2, Scheidegger' & Associates has assembled an experienced and highly qualified team for the alternative route analysis study that meet the considerations stated above. Mr. Paul Scheidegger, our project manager, brings more than 30 years of experience in conduct of siting evaluations and analyzing the impacts of new facilities and expansion of existing facilities on the environment. The analysis of roadway impacts has been a common component of these projects. None of Mr. Scheidegger's CEQA documents has ever been challenged. Similarly, the remainder of our project team--consisting of Abrams Associates, Environmental Collaborative, Illingworth & Rodkin, and Archeo-Tec--will all bring a high level 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai 3-2 of experience and professionalism to the City's project. These firms are specialists in their fields and the key individuals have at least 20 years of experience. Several particularly noteworthy projects completed by our project team are briefly described below. Qualification materials of all firms, including resumes and projects, are included at the end of this section. City of Fresno Comparative Environmental Site Assessment (CESA) Scheidegger & Associates and Tetra Tech just completed a CESA for Phase 1 of the City of Fresno Regional Co-Composting Project. The City is evaluating whether to build and operate a composting facility that would accommodate all of the City's biosolids and green waste. The analysis featured a GIS-based site selection process that was used to identify and evaluate more than 700 potential sites for a composting facility. A detailed assessment was'then completed on the three sites that remained. Each of the sites was evaluated against CEQA significance criteria, including the presence of suitable access corridors and the impacts they would create. The CESA recommended one site and the City is now evaluating whether to proceed with Phase 2. Ukiah Water Storage Expansion Project (2002 to 2004) Mr. Martin of Environmental Collaborative provided biological and wetland consulting services to Ukiah Utility District as part of the water storage expansion project. This included conduct of detailed surveys for special-status plants, habitat assessment for special-status animal species, wetland delineations, and preconstruction surveys for raptors. Following the constraints analysis, he prepared the Biological Resource section of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the preferred alternative, and worked with staff in refining the project design to minimize tree removal and loss of jurisdictional waters. Napa Valley College, Facilities Master Plan and Individual Development Projects (2003 to present) Mr. Martin has provided ongoing biological and wetland consulting services to Napa College as they completed their Facilities Master Plan for the 200-acre site in Napa, and are now 09/26/05/UkiabdOrchard Avenuc Extension Study/Iai 3-3 moving forward with a number of individual development projects, including intersection improvements to Highway 229, new access road and creek crossing, and a large photovoltaic field in the historic floodplain of the Napa River. He coordinated and completed mapping of existing wetlands and detailed surveys for special-status species, and prepared the Biological Resources section of the EIR on the Facilities Master Plan. McDowell Boulevard Study - City of Petaluma Abrams Associates has been engaged by the local property owners and the City of Petaluma to evaluate alternative roadway alignments and freeway interchange connections with Highway 101 at McDowell Boulevard and Washington Avenue in the City of Petaluma. The study included an analysis of land use patterns, traffic forecasts, roadway system cost estimates, and preliminary roadway plans. The project is being used to establish a traffic impact fee program for the City of Petaluma. 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai SCHEIDEGGER & ASSOCIATES SCHEIDEGGER & ASSOCIATES · ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POST OFFICE BOX 331 DANVILLE, CA 94526 · CEQA COMPLIANCE (925) 820-9757 FAX: (925 820-7966 PAUL A. SCHEIDEGGER Mr. Scheidegger has 30 years of environmental consulting experience. He formed Scheidegger & Associates in 1997 after 23 years with a national environmental engineering firm as a senior project manager. In that position, he was responsible for business development and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance for a wide variety of site development, infrastructure, and waste management projects. Project experience focuses on the western United States, but also includes Puerto Rico, Hawaii, and Central America. Most of Mr. Scheidegger's experience has focused on evaluating the suitability of a site to acco, mmodate a changed land use. In many instances, he has supervised and directed large multi-discipline teams to address a full array of site development, technical and environmental issues. He regularly advises jurisdictions on CEQA compliance and integration of environmental planning and permit requirements into project development. Because of the nature of his work, Mr. Scheidegger is very experienced at interacting and coordinating with City and County Planning and Public Works Departments, special districts, and state and federal agencies. Frequently, he assists local jurisdictions with the conduct of public meetings and hearings before Planning Commissions, City Councils, and Boards of Supervisors. Professional Experience 1997 - Present Principal Scheidegger & Associates, Danville, California 1974 - 1997 Senior Project Manager Brown and Caldwell, Walnut Creek, California Education 1971 - 1973 M.S., Ecology University of California at Davis, California 1967 - 1971 B.S., Biology University of Pacific at Stockton, California Professional Societies Association of Environmental Professionals SITE DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING EXPERIENCE Proiect Site Development Reports for New Postal Facilities U.S. Postal Service Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Administration Building and Corporation Yard Union Sanitary District, CA Environmental Assessment (EA) for Honduras Airport Improvement Projects San Francisco International Airport, CA Ohiapalo Wetlands Enhancement Project Maui County, Hawaii Constraints/Opportunities Analysis for Treatment Plant Expansion City of Petaluma, CA IS/MND for DaSilva Slaughterhouse Use Permit Santa Clara County, CA Focused Constraints Analysis for Quarry Closure Pleasanton, CA Habitat Conversion Analysis Associated with Increased Wastewater Collection System Capacity Union Sanitary District, CA Description Site development and constraints assessment for new postal facilities throughout California. New administration building and corporation yard location at the District's Alvarado Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements to the four airports in Honduras. EA prepared to meet World Bank requirements. Planning and design of a 20-acre wetland enhancement project on Molokai pursuant to an EPA Consent Order. Identification and analysis of a range of facility options and sites for new treatment and effluent storage facilities. New use permit for existing facility in southern county area. Planning, biological, and cultural resource assessment for altemative quarry closure options. Detailed analysis of general plan consistency, habitat conversion, and effects on federally listed species within Union City and Fremont. WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING EXPERIENCE Project Initial Study/Mitigated Declaration (IS/MND) on Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project City of Hayward, CA IS/ND for Redwood Street Sanitary Sewer Rerouting Project Vallejo Sanitation and Flood Control District, CA Primary Impact Assessment for San Ramon Valley Reclamation Project Dublin San Ramon Services District, CA Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on Newark Subbasin Sewer Correction Program Union Sanitary District, CA IS/ND for Upper Fremont Boulevard Corridor Sewer Project Union Sanitary District, CA Supplemental EIR for Expansion of Monterey Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency, CA IS/MND and Permitting on Ukiah Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project City of Ukiah, CA Description Improvements to existing City treatment plant to improve treatment process reliability and redundancy. Installation of 3,300 feet of new and replacement pipeline in Vallejo to correct capacity limits. Landscape irrigation with highly treated reclaimed water together with year-round discharge to San Ramon Creek for stream flow augmentation. Capital correction program and relief sewer/lift station project in Fremont. Installation of 9,120 feet of sewer in Fremont to alleviate capacity and structural deficiencies. Expansion of existing facility serving the Monterey peninsula communities. Improvements and expansion of existing facility to improve treatment process reliability and redundancy and accommodate planned growth. WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING EXPERIENCE (continued) Project EIR for Wastewater Facilities Plan City of Bakersfield, CA IS/ND for Stevenson Boulevard Corridor Sewer Improvement Project Union Sanitary District, CA IS/MND for Process Water Disposal Project Harter Packing Company, Yuba City, CA IS/MND for Wastewater Facilities Plan City of Oxnard, CA IS/MND for Alvarado Boulevard Trunk Sewer Project Union Sanitary District, CA Environmental Planning Assistance for ConAgra Food Processing Facility Oakdale, CA IS/MND for Lower Warren Avenue Sewer Project Union Sanitary District, CA Description Alternative sites for a new wastewater treatment plant and alignments for new interceptqrs, Maser Plan later redefined negating further CEQA review. Installation of 17,500 feet of sewer pipeline in Fremont to provide additional capacity. Relocation of process water disposal project to meet RWQCB requirements. New wastewater collection pipelines and pump stations for system upgrade and growth accommodation. Installation of 15,600 feet of new sewer within an urban setting and crossing of a flood control channel. Assessment of CEQA compliance for tomato process water disposal options. Installation of 5,140 feet of sewer within Fremont to alleviate capacity and structural deficiencies. WATER INFRASTRUCTURE EXPERIENCE Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for Port Chicago Pipeline Project Contra Costa Water District, CA 48-inch-diameter pipeline to increase the firm capacity of the District's water system. IS/ND for Reservoir 2 Replacement Project Daly City, CA Partially buried concrete replacement reservoir on a hilltop north of San Bruno Mountain. IS/MND for Antioch River Pumping Station Antioch, CA Increased pump station capacity from 6.3 to 8.3 mgd and fish screen enhancement. IS/ND for Camanche Reservoir Hypolimnetic Oxygenation Demonstration Project East Bay Municipal Utility District, CA Installation of an oxygenation system as a means of solving hydrogen sulfide problems in the releases from the reservoir. IS/MND for Reservoir 2B Replacement Project City of Daly City, CA Partially buried concrete replacement reservoir on a hilltop north of San Bruno Mountain. Environmental Assessment (EA) for Siting of a New Water Treatment Plant San Benito County Water Conservation and Flood Control District, CA Analysis of alternative sites for a new water treatment plant. SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPERIENCE Project Environmental Planning for Regional Co-Composting Facility Fresno, CA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for Transfer Station and Material Recovery Facility Pefia's Disposal, Inc. Orosi, CA EIR for Bulk Material Processing Center Land Use Permit Changes Contra Costa County, CA EIR for Class II Landfill, Contra Costa County, CA E[R for Closure of Class I Vine Hill Complex Contra Costa County, CA EIR for Madera County Integrated Solid Waste Management Project, Madera County, CA IS/MND for Z-Best Composting Facility Expansion Santa Clara County, CA ElS for Waste-to-Energy Plant San Juan, Puerto Rico Description Assisting with an alternative siting analysis for the City's composting project involving use of green waste and biosolids from the regional treatment plant. A 500-TPD transfer and materials recovery facility in northern Tulare County which includes green material and construction, demolition, and inert material processing. Expansion of operations at the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill which included facilities for green material composting, concrete/asphalt processing, wet waste/powdery material, wood recovery, soil sedimentation, waste recycling and solid waste transfer (1,200 TPD); and a landfill height increase. A new landfill in central Contra Costa County proposed by a private developer. Closure of a Class I hazardous waste facility which included decommissioning a treatment plant and closure of 170 acres of surface impoundments. Expansion of the County's Fairmead Landfill, including a green material compost facility, materials recovery facility, C&D and green material processing, and a permanent household hazardous waste facility. Expansion from 500 to 1,500 TPD, alternative composting technologies, a 50-acre inert material processing pad, and a material processing building. 1,300-TPD mass-fired waste-to-energy plant serving the metropolitan San Juan area. SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPERIENCE (continued) Project EIR for IT Vine Hill Hazardous Waste Treatment Plant Modernization Contra Costa County, CA IS/ND for Regional Integrated Waste Management Plan West Contra Costa Waste Management Authority, CA EIR for B&J Landfill Master Development Plan Solano County, CA EIR for Closure of Class I West County Landfill Hazardous Waste Management Facility Contra Costa County, CA EIR for Highway 59 Landfill Expansion Merced County, CA EIR for Weldon Canyon Landfill Ventura County, CA Program EIR for Integrated Solid Waste Management System Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, CA ElS for Kalamaula Landfill Closure Maui County, HI EIR for Stanford University Hazardous Waste Management Facility Stanford University, CA Description A new treatment plant and incinerator for processing hazardous and toxic wastes, project withdrawn after 9 months. Plan by Authority for reducing solid waste landfill disposal. Landfill expansion, on-site soil borrow area, revised design and operations, closure of a module, and support facilities. In-place closure of a 28-acre Class I landfill formerly used for disposal of hazardous waste. 200-acre lateral expansion of County' s landfill, project withdrawn after extended deliberation of wetland issue. New Class III canyon landfill between Ventura and Ojai. Countywide recycling.programs, c0mposting, landfill expansions, long distance waste transport, and new landfill sites near the metropolitan area. Landfill closure on Molokai including extended involvement with'EPA's consent order process due to previous filling of wetland areas. On-campus facility for management of infectious, chemical, and low-level radiological waste streams. SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPERIENCE (continued) Project IS/MND for B&J Landfill Modified Master Development Plan Solano County, CA EIR Review of Milliken Waste- to-Energy Project San Bernardino County, CA EIR Review of Stanislaus Waste- to-Energy Project Stanislaus County, CA IS/MND for Landfill Site Remediation Antioch, CA EIR for Solid Waste Management Plan Sonoma County, CA IS/ND for Source Reduction Recycling (SRR) and Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Elements West Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, CA Description Redesignation of landfill from Class III to II, a co- composting facility, and a household hazardous waste facility. Independent review of applicant's EIR for 1,600-TPD waste-to-energy plant focusing on CEQA requirements and technical accuracy. Independent review of applicant's EIR for 1,000-TPD waste-to-energy plant focusing on CEQA requirements and technical accuracy. Cleanup and abatement of old municipal landfill site which threatens water quality of Markley Creek. Plan revision for evaluation of waste reduction and recycling technologies, and analysis of five landfill sites. CEQA documentation for 29 SRR/HHW elements for 17 jurisdictions. SCHEIDEGGER & ASSOCIATES References REFERENCE PROJECT Mr. Charley Stump Director, Planning and Community Development City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California (707) 463-6219 IS/MND for the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project (May 2004) Mr. William Skinner Chief, Solid Waste City of Fresno 1325 E. E1 Dorado Fresno, California (559) 621-1801 Comparative Environmental Site Analysis for City of Fresno Regional Co-Composting Project (August 2005) Report on CEQA Compliance for Beneficial Reuse of Biosolids and Green Waste (August 2005) Mr. Art Pefia Pefia's Disposal, Inc. 12843 Avenue 416 Orosi, CA 93647 (559) 528-6997 IS/MND on Transfer Station and Material Recovery Facility 09/25/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai ABRAMS ASSOCIATES Abrams Associates Transportation · Traffic · Engineering · Planning Stephen C. Abrams Vice President Mr. Abrams' experience is in the fields of traffic engineering and transportation planning. He joined with Abrams Associates in 1995, complementing the firms' capabilities in the area of computer applications and environmental review. During his professional career, Mr. Abrams has directed and worked on a broad range of projects that include: traffic operations; traffic modeling; traffic control studies; speed surveys, accident analyses, development planning; highway and interchange design; transportation planning; transit analysis; parking demand studies; pedestrian and bicycle analysis; environmental review documents; TSM program development; financial analyses and management. Mr. Abrams is highly experienced in the use of computer software for various transportation applications including: capacity analysis, network modeling, trip generation, transit analysis, pedestrian analysis, and travel demand forecasting. He is proficient in the use of many transportation programs including: Highway Capacity Software and most intersection capacity analysis programs, FHWA TRAF models (CORFLO, FREESIM, NETSIM, and ROADSIM), TRAFFIX, SYNCHRO and others. Mr. Abrams has developed numerous detailed spreadsheets for complex traffic and transportation applications. Representative engagements for which he has been responsible are described below. · Traffic Impact Studies San Francisco Central Freeway Areawide Traffic Study (Phases 1 and 2) Phase 1: Responsible for managing the extensive data collection effort involving traffic counts at over 220 intersections and off-ramps, machine traffic counts, travel time and ' delay runs, implementation of a large mail-back origin/destination survey of ramp users, and observation of queuing and effects on transit operations. Phase 2: Managed the large modeling effort required for the detailed analysis of the freeway interchange alternatives. A large CORFLO modeling network covering the entire Central Freeway Area (freeway and surface streets) was developed using origin-destination information obtained from the MTC MINUTP Model. Lower Fillmore Revitalization Project Traffic and Parking Plan - Prepared a highly detailed transportation impact study and traffic circulation and parking plan for a proposed neighborhood revitalization project in San Francisco which included a multiplex cinema, a jazz supper club, and extensive retail development. Detailed person and vehicle trip generation spreadsheets were developed and a survey of theater patrons was implemented to determine their parking and shared trip characteristics. Detailed recommendations for addressing the identified parking shortfall were prepared and a circulation plan to address neighborhood concerns and accommodate project generated and cumulative traffic was included. LAVWMA Export Pipeline - Mr. Abrams managed and reviewed the preparation of traffic control plans and an analysis of traffic impacts for the construction of one of the largest treated wastewater export pipelines in the Bay Area. The proposed 52-inch pipeline would extend from the treatment plant in Pleasanton over the hills through Castro Valley and San Leandro all the way to the edge of the San Francisco Bay. This project impacted many major arterials such as Castro Valley Boulevard, Mission Boulevard, and Lewelling Boulevard and affected several freeway on- and off-ramps. Over 100 different drawings were prepared to detail the plans for traffic control at various locations along the alignment. A thorough analysis of traffic operations was prepared to Page 2 Resume for Stephen C. Abrams Abrams Associates Transportation · Traffic · Engineering · Planning determine where micro-tunneling pits would be located, where night work was required, and how the open-cut sections would be staged in busy commercial areas. College Avenue Pipeline Project - Prepared detailed traffic control plans and a traffic study on the impacts of the proposed construction of a 1 1/2 mile section of 16" EBMUD water pipeline. Several major intersections required multi-stage traffic control plans to maintain adequate traffic flow past the construction area, including SR-13 (Ashby Avenue), Alcatraz Avenue, and Claremont Avenue. · Transportation Planning' Bayshore Corridor System Planning Study - Prepared the alternatives analysis and traffic planning section of the report. The project involved development of technical information on the light rail routes proposed and the associated changes in bus service. Location and planning for proposed stops were completed along with travel time, ridership, and cost estimates for each alternative. San Francisco Comprehensive Bicycle Plan - Participated in the development of a comprehensive bicycle plan for the City of San Francisco's Master Plan. The study involved the designation of commute and recreational bike routes, identification and mitigation of safety hazards, plans for safe parking, integration of bicycles and transit, and identification of sources of funding for bicycle projects. San Luis Obispo Transit Center Study - Responsible for investigating the various alternative sites being considered for a proposed downtown bus transfer center. Investigated existing bus facilities and assessed each site for traffic and environmental impacts. · Other Representative Proiects SFTA LOS Monitoring Update Alameda County LOS Monitoring Program City of E1 Cerrito Traffic Engineering Services Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit DEIR Professional Experience 1995 to Present Abrams Associates 1993 to 1995 Wilbur Smith Associates 1989 to 1993 Environmental Science Associates, Inc. Education San Francisco State University, B.S. in Civil Engineering, 1992 Professional Registration Registered Professional Traffic Engineer in the State of California. License No. TR1852 A~ffiliations American Society of Civil Engineers Institute of Transportation Engineers Abrams Associates Transportation · Traffic · Engineering ° Planning General Qualifications Statement Abrams Associates is a Walnut Creek, California based consulting firm specializing in traffic engineering and transportation planning. The firm was founded in 1985 by Charles M. Abrams, and has successfully completed a broad range of transportation-related projects. Prior to founding Abrams Associates, Mr. Abrams was a Vice President with one of the leading transportation consulting finns in the industry. Since opening its doors over twenty years ago, Abrams Associates has undertaken hundreds of traffic and transportation projects - many of them large, complex and controversial. The firm has become well known for the ability of its professionals to make the traffic engineering and transportation planning process a practical one by using their skills to guide projects through environmental and other regulatory reviews to timely implementation. The firm has provided traffic and transportation consulting services to a wide range of clients, including public agencies at the local, city, county, regional state, and federal levels and various private concerns. The firm emphasizes the high quality of its products, close interaction with clients, and the need for creative, practical solutions to transportation and traffic problems. The technical and project management abilities of the firm cover the full range of traffic engineering and transportation planning skills necessary for a wide variety of projects including: · Traffic Engineering - Geometric design - Traffic signal systems - Traffic calming treatments · Construction Traffic Studies - Traffic controlplans - Construction traffic impact studies · Traffic Circulation Studies - Local - Regional · Highway Design and Interchange/Ramp Analyses · Parking Studies and Surveys · Pedestrian Circulation Plans and Analyses · Traffic Safety Studies · Accident Analysis/Speed Surveys Page 2 Abrams Associates' Qualifications Abrams Associates Transportation · Traffic · Engineering · Planning · Transportation System Management (TSM) - Program development - Monitoring systems · Transportation Master Planning/Site Planning · Environmental Impact Report Preparation and Documentation · Computer Applications to Transportation and Traffic - High way Capacity ,4nalysis programs - FHWA TRAF models - CORFLO, FREESIM, NETSIM, and ROADSIM - MINUTP and the MTC Model - TRAFFIX - and other transit and transportation applications Members of the firm and associated consultants are talented transportation professionals with broad experience and research backgrounds, who have been active in private and public engineering and planning over the last twenty-five years. Abrams Associates has specialized in satisfying its clients on both large and small assignments and possesses a successful track record of completing projects in a timely and high quality manner. Representative technical assignments completed by the firm are annotated in their resumes and in the project description that follow. List of Public Clients Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) Alameda County Department of Public Works Central Contra Costa County Sanitary District City of Alameda City of Berkeley City of Burlingame City of Clayton City of Dublin City of Fairfield City of Livermore City of Orinda City of Palo Alto City of Pittsburg City of San Jose City of San Pablo City of Antioch City of Brentwood Town of Danville City of Concord City of E1 Cerrito City of Hercules City of Martinez City of San Francisco City of Pinole City of Sacramento City of San Leandro City of San Rafael City of Union City City of Walnut Creek Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Contra Costa County Dept of Public Works Contra Costa Water District Dublin-San Ramon Services District East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency Merced County Sacramento County San Francisco Transportation Authority San Francisco Redevelopment Agency San Ramon Unified School District Abrams Associates TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. List of References for Abrams Associates · City of Concord - Traffic Impact Studies, Traffic Signal Designs Mr. John Templeton, Transportation Division City of Concord, 1455 Gasoline Alley Concord, CA 94520 Tel: (925) 671-3129 · City of Clayton - Traffic Engineering Advisory Services, Traffic Signal Design, Construction Traffic Control, Residential Speed Controls Mr. Rick Angrisani, City Engineer City of Clayton, 6251 Center Street Clayton, CA 94517 Tel: (925)'672-4590 · City of Union City - Traffic Engineering Studies, Neighborhood Traffic Control, General Plan Update and Redevelopment Plan Studies Ms Joan Malloy, Planning Director City of Union City, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road Union City, CA 94587, Tel: (510) 675-5327 ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATIVE Consultation Documentation Restoration 1268 64th Street Emeryville, CA 94608 Phone 510/654-4444 ! FAX 510/655-4444 JAMES A. MARTIN SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Education B.S. in Biology, 1981, University of California at Berkeley B.A. in Art Practice, 1981, University of California at Berkeley Experience 1983 - Date ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATIVE, Emeryville, California. Principal. Principal of environmental consulting and natural resource management firm with office located in Emeryville, California. Providing environmental consulting, planning, research, and documentation for both public and private sectors, specializing in biological and wetland resource assessment and management services. Biological and wetland services include assessments for proposed development applications and transportation plans, preparation of habitat conservation and mitigation plans, and consultation with jurisdictional agencies. Involved in preparation of over 200 environmental assessments, mitigation plans, planning studies, and related documentation. These include county and city general plans, specific plans, new community plans, development applications for residential, commercial, and industrial uses, public facility assessments, and open space and natural resource management plans. Mr. Martin has also served as vegetation specialist for two geologic hazard abatement districts in Contra Costa County, collectively overseeing vegetation management of over 3,000 acres of open space. 1983 ENGINEERING-SCIENCE, Berkeley, Responsible for data gathering and assessments and documents. California. analysis, Environmental Scientist. preparation of environmental 1981-1983 LARRY SEEMAN ASSOCIATES, Berkeley, California. Environmental Analyst. Responsible for preparation of environmental documents and supervision of environmental studies for sites located throughout northern California. Experience included research and data collection, field surveys and reconnaissance, report preparation and review, project management and personnel coordination. 1981 U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Pacific Southwest Forest & Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California. Research Technician. Involved in data collection and analysis, related primarily to use of ornamental vegetation in urban settings. 1979 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Los Angeles, Department of Geology. Field Assistant. Conducted vegetation analysis of California north coast sage scrub vegetation type. ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATIVE References REFERENCE PROJECT Ms. Ann Burck City of Ukiah 411 West Clay Street Ukiah, California (707) 463-6286 Ukiah Water Storage Expansion Project Mr. Ken Erickson Project Coordinator 7300 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 203 Sacramento, California (916) 381-9100, Ext. 3011 Napa Valley College Facilities Master Plan And Individual Development Projects Ms. Michele Rodriguez Principal Planner Marin County CDA 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308 San Rafael, CA 94903 (415) 745-5845 Matin Countywide Plan Update and EIR 09/26/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN Tel: 70 7- 766- 7700 www. Illin g, vort h rodkin, com ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. tlllB Acoustics · Air Quality 111/ 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, California 94952 Fax: 707-766-7790 illro~illingworthrodkin, com PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. was founded in 1987 as an Acoustical Engineering firm. In 1995 we expanded our capabilities to include air quality studies. Our goal is to provide our clients with the benefit of our expertise and experience gained from completing over 3,000 studies in acoustics and air quality. Our services include: Environmental Studies · Noise and air quality assessments for environmental studies (EIR, IS, EIS, EA) · Noise and air quality technical studies for transportation projects · Noise studies for new residential developments · Community noise control plans and ordinances · Noise Ordinance compliance · Air quality conformity determinations Architectural Acoustics · Designs for interiors · Control of noise transmission between spaces · Isolation from exterior noise · Code compliance Noise Control Engineering · Designs and specifications for mechanical and electrical equipment · Solutions for existing noise and vibration problems in buildings and industry Computer Modeling · Traffic noise using TNM, SOUND32 and LEQV2 · Stationary noise sources using ENM · Air Pollutant emissions estimation using EMFAC7, Mobile, AP-42 · Microscale air quality traffic modeling using CALINE4, CAL3QHC Stationary air pollution source modeling using EPA-approved models (e.g., SCREEN, CTSCREEN,ISCST, COMPLEXI) Field Monitoring · Environmental noise and vibration · Sound isolation, impact insulation and reverberation time in buildings · Mechanical and electrical equipment noise and vibration · Noise from industrial plants · Meteorological conditions · Aerometrics and Air toxics Expert Testimony · Lawsuits · Presentations to government bodies ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. //11 Acoustics ·A/r Oua//ty 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, California 94952 Tel: 707-766-7700 www. Illingworthrodla'n. corn Fax: 70 7- 766- 7790 illro~illingworthrod]a'n, com RICHARD B. RODKIN~ PE Mr. Rodkin has been responsible for a wide range of studies in environmental noise, architectural acoustics, and noise control engineering. He worked with staff of the California Energy Commission assessing noise impacts of power cogeneration projects, a solar project, and a transmission line. A recent research study for Caltrans investigated long-distance diffraction and reflection of noise from sound walls. In another study, he measured underwater sound levels generated by piledriving in San Francisco Bay. Transportation noise and vibration studies include freeways and light-rail systems in the Bay Area and San Diego, and numerous road widening and improvement projects for cities and counties. Other environmental noise studies include port expansions in the Bay Area and Los Angeles; Clean Fuels projects at Bay Area refineries; aircraft noise; new and expanding mines and quarries; power plants and cogeneration projects; geothermal and on-shore oil fields; noise ordinance violations; commercial, institutional, housing and other miscellaneous development projects; Specific Plans, and Noise Elements of the General Plans. He has acted as an expert witness in cases involving traffic noise, construction noise, and a murder case where audibility was an issue. During the past 31 years Mr. Rodkin has worked continuously in all aspects of acoustical .design relating to new buildings including architectural acoustics, sound isolation, and the control of noise and vibration from mechanical equipment. Projects include housing, office buildings, hospitals, university buildings, TV studios and teleconferencing facilities, churches, an airport expansion, hotels, small power plants, and cogeneration facilities. 1987-Present Principal Consultant PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. Petaluma, California 1976-1987 Acoustical Consultant Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc., San Francisco, California 1973-1976 Acoustical Consultant Buonaccorsi & Associates San Francisco, California EDUCATION 1978 University-of California at Berkeley M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Major: Acoustics 1973 University of California at Davis B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Major: Power/Propulsion PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION AND SOCIETIES California: Mechanical Engineer No. 23900 (1985) Institute of Noise Control Engineers Acoustical Society of America ASHRAE ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN References Mr. Jim Andrews Environmental Program, MS 27 Office of Environmental Engineering 1120 N Street P.O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 (916) 653-9554 Mr. Pete Parkinson Sonoma County Planning Department 2550 Venmra Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 565-1900 09/25/05/Ukiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai ARCHEO-TEC ARCHEO-TEC CONSULTING ARCHAEOLOGISTS ALLEN G. PASTRON, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Years of Experience 28 (with Archeo-Tec) 5 (with Santa Clara University) Education Ph.D. in Anthropology, June 1977, University of California, Berkeley B.A. in Anthropology, June 1968, University of California, Berkeley *Emphasis on California Prehistory and Historical Archaeology of the San Francisco Bay Area Professional Associations Register of Professional Archaeologists and Society for American Archaeology Key Qualifications In his capacity as President of Archeo-Tec Inc., Dr. Pastron has written more than 500 cultural resource reports from research projects throughout Central and Northern California, and Nevada. He has published more than fifty books, articles in professional journals, and popular publications. Has exhibited numerous artifact collections from the Gold Rush Period of the San Francisco Bay Area in several museums and public buildings. Dr. Allen Pastron, is certified by the (ROPA). This register, a national organization, is the only comprehensive certification body for professional archaeological consultants in the United States. Past or Current Related Experience Mission Bay Development Project, San Francisco, California. 1999-Present Principal Archaeological Consultant Sponsored by: Catellus Development Corporation Excavated, interpreted and analyzed historic period archaeological sites situated along the original Mission Bay shoreline. To date, the most important of these sites consists of the well-preserved remnants of a Chinese residence/laundry that existed near the tip of Steamboat Point during the early-to-mid 1860's. 1166-1188 Howard Street, San Francisco, California July 2000 Principal Archaeological Consultant Sponsored by: During and Associates Completed archeological mitigation of the parcel, including test trenching and coordinating on site monitoring. Managed the collection of a prehistoric scatter and historic artifacts ranging from the Gold Rush period to 20th century, including an Asian porcelain contingent. WorldCom's Fiber Optic Proiect, located at 20th Street and Broadway, Oakland, California 2000 Principal Archaeological Consultant Sponsored by: SprinffWorldCom. Research entailed an archival and archaeological assessment of a proposed fiber optic site in downtown Oakland, California. *Additional related experience available upon request. 5283 Broadway, Oakland, California 94618 · (510) 601-6185 · Fax (510) 601-8203" archeo-tec~archeo-tec.com ARCHEO-TEC CONSULTING ARCHAEOLOGISTS ANDREW GOTTSFIELD, B.A. Project Manager Years of Experience 7 1/2 years (with Archeo-Tec) Education B.A. in Anthropology, June 1996, Northern Arizona University Key Qualifications Has a wide range of field and laboratory experience. Has co-written 18 technical reports and has photos and illustrations in 4 published reports. Specializes in surveying, field and laboratory cartography, and field and laboratory photography. Has specific expertise in the photographic documentation of human skeletal remains and pathology, as well as historic and prehistoric artifacts. Demonstrated proficiency in a variety of computer software programs, including Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, PageMaker, AutoCAD, and 3- D modeling programs. Responsible for assemblage of technical reports and illustrations. Past or Current Related Experience Jessie Square Garage Project, San Francisco, California 2004-2005 Project Manager Project Sponsor: Jessie Square Garage Parmers, LLC, and Millenium Parmers Identification, analysis, and write-up of Final Archaeological Report for newly discovered prehistoric sites CA-SFR-147 and CA-SFR-155 in San Francisco. Rich Sorro Commons, San Francisco, Califomia January 2001- August 2003 Staff Archaeologist Conducted analyses and interpretation of recovered faunal. Provided necessary information regarding Chinese butchering, food processing, and cooking methods, which aided in overall interpretations of the site's historical importance. Mission Bay Development Proiect, San Francisco, California. 1999-Present Staff Archaeologist/Photographer Sponsored by: Catellus Development Corporation Aided in excavation historic period archaeological sites situated along the original Mission Bay shoreline and led field cartography team. Managed laboratory photography and technical rendering of all maps. To date, the most important of these sites consists of the .well-preserved remnants of a Chinese residence/laundry that existed near the tip of Steamboat Point during the early-to-mid 1860's. *Additional related experience available upon request. 5283 Broadway, Oakland, California 94618 · (510) 601-6185 · Fax (510) 601-8203 * archeo-tect~archeo-tec.com ARCHEO-TEC References Mr. Steve Patterson and Mr. Mark Farrar Millennium Partners 735 Market Street, Third Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 593-2500 Ms. Stacey Comell, Project Coordinator The Salvation Army, Golden Gate Division 832 Folsom Street San Francisco, CA 94107 (415) 553-3500 Mr. Sm During During Associates 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 2290 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 986-0884 09/25/05Fu'kiah/Orchard Avenue Extension Study/Iai AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. lO. ¢ DATE: November 16, 2005 REPORT SUB3ECT: DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION CONCERNING THE USE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS TO PLAN-CHECK LARGE AND COMPLEX BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS. SUMMARY: For over twenty years, the City has contracted with engineering firms to perform structural engineering review on large and complex Building Permits. The cost of the service is paid by the applicants when they pay their plan-check fee. Small and routine Building Permits not involving detailed structural engineering are plan-checked in-house by the City Building Tnspector/Plans Examiner. In 2000, the City contracted with Coastland Engineering to perform the structural engineering review task and to provide substitute building inspection services. The service has generally been adequate with the exception of the past six months. There have been failures to meet the timeframes for completing the first and second reviews, which have caused delays in construction projects. There has also been a lack of timely response to Staff inquiries, which has caused an inability to provide information to applicants about the status of their projects. This, in turn, has caused undue tension and stress between Staff, the applicants, and Coastland Engineering. (continued on page 2) RECOMMENDATION: Discuss the City's Building Permit structural engineering review program and consider directing Staff to pursue contracting with a second firm to assist with structural engineering review. ALTERNA'i'~/E COUNCTL POLTCY OPTION: Do not have a discussion and provide direction to Staff. Citizens Advised: Coastland Engineering, a number of local architects, contractors, and frequent applicants Requested by: Charley Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development Prepared by: Charley Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Coastland Engineering contract, dated August 30, 2000 APPROVED: Candace Horsley, City Manag~ Discussions with Coastland Engineering leadership during this time revealed staffing issues and problems. However, City Staff was assured that the issues would be quickly resolved and performance would improve. Unfortunately, Coastland's performance continued to be inconsistent and some recent plan-checks have been late. Staff met with Coastland Engineering leadership on November 9, 2005 to discuss their performance and our relationship. They have corrected their staffing problems, and are responding to communication issues. However, at this time, Staff would like to explore and evaluate options for our Building Permit structural engineering review program. Discussions with local architects, contractors, and frequent applicants have revealed a number of suggestions and options. These options include, but are not limited to :L) soliciting Request for Proposa/$ (RFP) from qualified firms and possibly making a change in consultant assistance; 2) evaluating the hiring of two or more firms to share the duties, thereby ensuring timely review; and 3) evaluating the contract to provide disincentives for missed deadlines and lack of performance. Staff has discussed the option of hiring a second firm to ease the load with Coastland Engineering. They are supportive of this concept and have indicated that most jurisdictions now have two or more firms under contract. This provides a measure of security during times of heavy workload and/or staffing problems in terms of meeting deadlines. This option would not result in additional cost to the public or have a financial impact on the City. RECOMMENDA11:ON: Staff recommends that the Council discuss this matter and consider directing Staff to pursue contracting with a second firm to assist with structural engineering review. Attachment AGREEMENT FOR PLAN CHECKING AND SUBSTITUTE BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES This agreement is made this/~O "Sz~ day of 2000, between the City of Ukiah ("CITY"), and COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC., a California corporation with its principle office located at 2292 Notthpoint Parkway, Santa Rosa, CA., 95407, ("CONSULTANT"). RECITALS Ao CITY is mandated to review building plans to determine whether they comply with the City of Ukiah Municipal Code; and S. CITY is mandated to inspect building projects to determine whether the work is consistent with the approved plans and all applicable codes and laws; and C. CITY needs substitute building inspection services from time to time when the City Building Inspector is absent from the office; and Do CONSULTANT represents that they are qualified to provide these services required by CITY, and E. The parties have negotiated upon the terms pursuant to which CONSULTANT will provide such services and have herein reduced such terms to writing. AGREEMENT NOw, THEREFORE, CITY and CONSULTANT do hereby agree as follows: I. Scope of Service: CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with the following services: A. CONSULTANT shall perform the following services as requested from time to time by CITY'S Chief Building Official or assigned designee: . Conduct full service or partial review of plans and documents for building projects in the City of Ukiah to determine whether such plans and documents are in substantial compliance with Building Regulations of the Ukiah City Code and with the California Building Code. A full service review is defined as a non-structural, structural, and energy conservation plan check. A structural review is defined as a structural only plan check. An energy review is defined as an energy only plan check. . When such determination has been made, CONSULTANT shall notify the originator of the documentation as to any lack of compliance found. II. . CONSULTANT will review re-submission of corrected documentation and repeat the process, if necessary, until compliance is obtained. . CONSULTANT will then return all plans and documents, corrected' by the originator as necessary, to CITY'S Chief Building Official with a statement that compliance has been determined. . CONSULTANT agrees to perform plan review services according to the following time table: a, Residential Proiects: Initial plan check, including the issuance of a letter of review, shall be completed within ten (10) working days upon receipt of a complete submittal package. All subsequent plan checks shall be completed within five (50 working days upon receipt. bo Non-Residential Proiects: Initial plan check, including the issuance of a letter of review, shall be completed within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of a complete submittal package. All subsequent plan checks shall be completed within ten (10) working days upon receipt. Bo In addition, CONSULTANT shall be responsible and shall be readily available to CITY'S Chief Building Official for the handling and answering of any and all questions, inquiries, and correspondence referred to CONSULTANT by the Chief Building Official regarding services performed under this agreement. C. CONSULTANT shall provide substitute building inspection services to the CITY if requeSted. Inspections will be performed to verify complianCe with the CITY'S Building Regulations, in accordance with CITY'S policies and procedures. CONSULTANT will provide' appropriate transportation for inspector. If CONSULTANT uses a Coastland Civil Engineering vehicle, the CITY will be charged no more than a $6.00 per hour transportation fee. If CONSULTANT uses a personal vehicle, CITY will be charged no more than a $0.40 per mile transportation fee. Do CONSULTANT shall stand ready to begin to perform services required by this agreement immediately upon execution of this agreement, and shall perform such services diligently until this agreement is terminated according to the procedures herein. Payments: A. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT for plan review services as follows: , Full service review including first re-check: 85% of the City's plan check fee. . Structural only review including first re-check: 50% of the City's plan check fee. , Structural and energy review including first re-check: 75% of the City's plan check fee. o Energy only review including first re-check: 25% of the City's. plan check fee. , Subsequent re-checks and other services shall be paid for on a time and materials basis. The CONSULTANT schedule of hourly rates entitled: "Exhibit A", is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. B. City shall pay CONSULTANT for substitute building Inspection.services on an hourly basis according to the attached Exhibit "A." Co Payments prescribed herein shall constitute all compensation to CONSULTANT for all costs of service, including but not limited to, direct costs of labor of employees engaged by CONSULTANT, travel expenses, telephone charges, typing, duplication, computer time, and any and all other costs, expenses, and charges of CONSULTANT, his agents and employees. Ill. Ownership of Documents A. Ownership of Work and Rights: (1) Work made for hire. The term "Documents" includes, but is not limited to, all designs, drawings, specifications, and other technical data. produced by CONSULTANT in performing under this Agreement. Said Documents constitute a work made for hire, as that term is defined in Section 101 of Title 17 of the United States Code (the Copyright Act). (2) Assignment of Copyrights. If all or part of the Documents is, for any reason, deemed not to be a work made for hire, CONSULTANT agrees to execute all documents necessary to transfer to CITY the ownership of any and all rights, including but not limited to copyrights, that CONSULTANT may have in the documents. (3) Waiver of Moral Rights. To the extent that CONSULTANT has any moral rights (droit moral) Or similar rights in the Documents under the law of any jurisdiction, CONSULTANT expresslY waives those rights. CONSULTANT waives any right to have the documents attributed to CONSULTANT or to prevent the Documents from being modified, edited, transformed, or otherwise adapted as CITY may deem necessary. IV. Mo VI. (4) Ownership of Documents. CITY will own the exclusive rights to and in the documents, including, but not limited to, all United States and International copyrights and other intellectual property rights. In the event that this Agreement is terminated, CITY will own the exclusive rights including, but not limited to, all United States and International copyrights and other intellectual property rights, in the portion of the Documents actually completed. (5) CONSULTANT agrees that CITY shall have access at all reasonable times to inspect and make copies of all notes, designs, drawings, specifications, 'and other technical data pertaining to the work. Upon termination of this agreement for any reason or by either party, and upon completion of this agreement, all notes, designs, drawings, specification and other technical data produced under this agreement shall be transferred to and become property of CITY upon its request without additional compensation. B. CONSULTANT shall maintain the aforementioned records and any other records related to the performance of this agreement, and shall allow CITY access to such records, for a period of three (3) years after termination of the Agreement. Conflict of Interest CONSULTANT covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of his services hereunder. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no persons .having any such interest shall be employed. Indemnity CONSULTANT shall indemnify, and hold .harmless CITY, its officers, employees and agents from all other claims, loss, damages, injuries, and/or liabilities including attorney's fees and all other expenses of defense, arising directly or indirectly out of negligence or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT under this agreement excluding liabilities due to or adsing from the negligence or willful misconduct of CITY, its officers employees, and/or agents. Liability Insurance Without limiting CONSULTANT"S obligations arising under paragraph 6.2, CONSULTANT shall not begin work under this Agreement until it procures and maintains for the duration of this Agreement insurance against' claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with its performance under this Agreement. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall be at least as broad as: , Insurance Services Office ("ISO") Commercial General Liability Coverage Form No. CG 00 01 11 85. , ISO form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" or Code 8,9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025. , Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. o Professional Liability Insurance covering damages which may result from errors, omissions or acts of professional .negligence by CONSULTANT. C, Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: . General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the Agreement premises. . Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. . o Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. Professional Liability coverage: $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence. If the coverage is an aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must apply separately to the Agreement premises. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the option of the CITY, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the CONSULTANT shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. Do Other Insurance Provisions The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages a. The CITY, its officers, officials, employees or designated volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects; liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, products and completed operations of the CONULTANT, premises owned, occupied or used by the CONSULTANT, or automobiles Agreemented, hired or borrowed by the CONSULTANT. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the CITY its officers, officials, or employees. bo The CONSULTANT'S insurance coverage shall be pdmary insurance as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, and employees. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, and employees shall be excess of the CONSULTANT'S insurance and shall not contribute with it. C. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the CITY, its officers, officials, or employees. . d. The' CONSULTANT'S insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Workers' Compensation and EmploYers Liability Coverage The Insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, officials, and employees for losses arising from CONSULTANT'S possession of the Agreemented Premises, pursuant to this Agreement. 3. Professional Liability Coverage If written on a claims-made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the effective date of this Agreement or prior. The policy period shall maintained for two years following the termination of this Agreement. 4. All Coverages Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party except after thirty (30) days prior wdtten by mail has been given to CITY, unless cancelled for non-payment, when ten (10) days written notice shall be given. VII. IX. E. Fo Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating or no less than A:VII and who are admitted insurers in the State of California. Verification of Coverage CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be on forms approved by the CITY. Where by statute, the CITY'S workers' compensation-related forms cannot be used, equivalent forms approved by the Insurance Commissioner are to be substituted. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before CONSULTANT takes possession of the Agreemented Premises. G. Subcontractors If CONSULTANT uses subcontractors or sub-consultants, it shall cover them under its policies or require them to separately comply with the insurance requirements set forth in the Paragraph 6.1. Assignment: CONSULTANT shall not assign any rights or duties under this agreement. Termination: Ao This agreement may be terminated by either party by giving thirty (30) days notice to the other in writing of its intent to terminate the agreement. Bo Upon such termination, CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an itemized statement of services performed to the date of termination, in accordance with Paragraph II of this agreement. Said services may include both completed work and work in process at the time of termination. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT for any such work for which compensation has not previously been made by CITY. Co CITY and CONSULTANT may negotiate and agree upon a fair and equitable method for completing work in progress after termination of the agreement. Compliance with Civil Riqhts: A. Equal Employment Opportunity In connection with the execution of this agreement, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee' or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin. X. B. Co Nondiscrimination Civil Riqhts Act of 1964 CONSULTANT will comply with all federal regulations relative to nondiscrimination to federally-assisted programs. Solicitations for Subcontractors includinq Procurement of Materials and Equipment In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiations, made by CONSULTANT for work to be performed under a subcontract including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor, supplier, or lessor shall be notified by CONSULTANT of CONSULTANT'S obligations under this agreement and the regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin. Notices: Except as otherwise specifically provided in this agreement, any notice submittal or VI I ~1 ~ I IVI VSV1 ~V VVI V V~ b~llllllMIIl~kl~ll IG~II~ VI ~lllllkk~ t~ g~ ~l V~ a by personal delive~ to the person or the offi~ of the person identified below. Se~ice may also be made by mail, by placing the notice, submiEal or communication in an envelope, with the proper first-class postage affixed thereto, and addressed as indicated below, and depositing said envelope into the United States mail to: CITY CONSULTANT City of Ukiah Building Division 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA. 95482 ATTN: Charles Stump Planning Director Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. 2292 Northpoint Parkway Santa Rosa, CA 95407 ATTN: John Wanger Principal Engineer XI. Independent Contractor It is specifically agreed that in providing the serviCes and in rendering its performance under this agreement, CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and is not and shall not be construed to be an officer or employee of the CITY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions above stated, the day and year first above written. .~L_~ENGINEERING, INC. Nam .'~ John Wanger Title: Principal Engineer CITY OF UKIAH ~ Name: Candace Horsily Title: City Manager Address: 2292 Northpoint Parkway Santa Rosa, CA 95407 Address: 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 APPRO/~ TO. FORM:,~ ba~id~a~, City A~ttor~ey ATTEST: Marie Ulvila, City Clerk Date: ,2000 EXHIBIT "A" COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001 SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Principal Engineer Supervising Engineer Senior Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant Engineer Junior Engineer Resident Engineer Principal Designer CAD Designer II CAD Designer I CAD Drafter Construction Manager Public Works Inspector Building Official Building Inspector Plans Examiner Building Technician $96-1061hour $92-100/hour $84-92/hour $72-84/hour $64-72/hour $30-64/hour o $72-92/hour $76-90/hour $62-76/hour $52-62/hour $42-52/hour $72-90/hour $60-76/hour $78-84/hour $58-72/hour $70-84/hour $50-60/hoUr CLERICAL VEHICLE MILEAGE OUTSIDE SERVICES MATERIALS $40-50/hour $6/hour $0.40/mile Cost + 15% Cost + 15%.Handling Charge Computer time is included in the hourly rates used above. Consultation in connection with litigation and court appearances will be quoted separately. Additional billing classifications may be added to the above listing during the year as new positions are created. Professional Building Department Service for the City of CUla'ah Coastland Civil Engineering 16