The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-07-10/11/12 Packet CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Adjourned Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue July 10, 1995 Monday, July 10, 1995, Fiscal Year 1995-96 Bud.clet Hearin.cts 9:00 a.m. I. Roll Call Proposed Budget Overview by City Manager A. B. C. D. E. Fi State of City Review of General and Enterprise Fund Summary (p. 3) Review of Authorized Personnel (p. 8) Review of Debt Summary (p. 17) Review of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures (p. 20) Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget Programs Questions and Answers 10:45 a.m. Break 11:00 a.m. III. Review of General Fund/Enterprise Fund Accounts A. City Council (p. 30) B. City Clerk/Elections (p. 35) C. City Treasurer (p. 42) D. City Attorney (p.46) E. City Management and Administration 1. City Manager (p. 49) 2. Personnel/Risk Management (p. 54) 12:00 p.m. Break 12:15 p.m. Working Lunch 4. 5. 6. 7. Secretarial Pool (p. 59) Community Outreach/Public Information (p. 64) Miscellaneous General Government (p.67) Federal Emergency Shelter Grant (p.70) Fixed Asset Replacement Fund (p. 71) 1:15 p.m. F~ Finance , 2. $. 4. 5. Finance (p. 73) Computer Support Services (p. 80) Business Improvement District (p. 84) Purchasing/Warehouse (p. 85) Billing and Collection (p. 92) 2:45 p.m. 3:15 p.m. 3:30 p.m. 5:00 p.m. GJ Planning 1. Community Planning (p. 99) 2. Building Inspection (p. 105) Break H. Public 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Safety Police (p. 109) Narcotic Task Force (p. 117) Police Reserves (p. 119) Fire (p. 121) Fire Volunteers (p. 132) Parking District (p. 134) Dispatch (p. 139) Ambulance (p. 143) Adjourn to Tuesday, July 11, 1995, 9:00 a.m. CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Adjourned Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue July 11, 1995 Tuesday, July 11, 1995, Fiscal Year 1995-96 Bud,qet Hearin,cis 9:00 a.m. I. Roll Call II. Continue Review of General Fund/Enterprise Fund Accounts Ae Public 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Works Engineering and Administration (p. 148) Street Maintenance (p. 154) Corporation Yard (p. 161) Gas Tax Projects (p. 164) SB 325 (p. 172) Municipal Garage (p. 173) 10:30 a.m. Break 7. Solid Waste Disposal Site (p. 180) 12:00 p.m. Break 12:15 p.m. Working Lunch e 9. 10. 11. Refuse/Debris Clean-Up (p. 191) Street Cleaning (p. 192) Leaf and Tree Control (p. 194) Weed Abatement (p. 196) Be Communify Services 1. General Government Buildings (Civic Center) (p. 198) 2. Parks (p. 203) 3. Park Development Fund (p. 210) 4. Recreation (p. 211) 5. Aquatics (p. 219) 6. Grace Hudson/Sun House Museum (p. 22.4) 7. Museum Grant Funds (pe 233) 8. Youth Service Ukiah (p. 236) 9. Municipal Golf Course (p. 242) 3:15 p.m. Break 3:30 p.m. 5:00 p.m. C. Public Utilities 1. Electric (p. 268) Adjourn to July 12, 1995, 9:00 a.m. CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Adjourned Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue July 12, 1995 Wednesday, July 12, 1995, Fiscal Year 1995-96 Bud,clet Hearin,cls 9:00 a.m. I. Roll Call II. Continue Review of General Fund/Enterprise Fund Accounts A. Public Utility (Continue Electric 1. Street Ughting (p. 294) 2. Traffic Signals (p. 297) 3. Water (p. 300) 10:30 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. Bi Ukiah Valley Conference Center (p. 319) Municipal Airport (p. 323) Adjourn to Regular Adjourned City Council meeting, July 12, 1995, 4:00 p.m., for Joint Meeting with Ukiah Valley Sanitation Distdct 12:00 p.m. Break 12:15 p.m. Working Lunch Convene as Ukiah Redevelopment Agency I. Roll Call II. Proposed Budget Overview by Executive Director III. Review of Funds A. Administrative (p. 331) B. Housing (p. 338) C. Capital Improvement (p. 339) IV. Adopt Resolution Approving Fiscal Year 1995-96 Redevelopment Agency Budget (p. 343) Adjourn to August 16, 1995 Regular Meeting 1:30 p.m. Break 4:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. III. Convene in Joint Meeting of the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District and Ukiah City Council for Review and Adoption of 1995-96 District Sewer Service Fund Budget (p. 251) Adjourn Joint Meeting with Ukiah Valley Sanitation District and Reconvene as City Council Adoption of Resolution Approving City of Ukiah Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget (p, 1) IV. Adjournment CITY OF UKIAH PERSONNEL ROSTER JULY, 1995 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY *NOTE: New positions and title changes proposed in 1995-96 Budget identified in CAPIT~ BOLD. Revised: 7/5/95 3 :PBRkROSTER CITY COUNCIL (Elected) Mayor Fred Schneiter Vice-Mayor Richard Shoemaker Councilmembers Sheridan Malone James Wattenburger Jim Mastin CITY CLERK (Elected) Cathy McKay CITY TREASURER (Elected) Patrick Coyne CITY ATTORNEY (Retainer) David Rapport CITY I~N~ER DEP~RTMENT City Manager Charles Rough Assistant City Manager Candace Horsley Assistant to the City Manaqer Michael Harris Executive Assistant Karen Yoast Administrative Secretary/Personnel Assistant Kari Revheim Administrative Secretary Kathy Kinch Marie Ulvila (PART-TIME) (NEW POSITION) Receptionist/Clerk Typist Andrea Bray Service Support Clerk Becky Ross (part-time) Joyce Radcliffe (part-time) Redevelopment Assistant Redevelopment Director Larry DeKnoblough Redevelopment General Services Attendant Karl Davis FINANCE DEPARTMENT Director of Finance Gordon Elton Accounting Supervisor Glenn Thurkow Payroll Officer Shirley Thomas Data Processing Coordinator/Accounts Payable Paulette Klingbeil CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR (NEW POSITION) Customer Service Rep. I Carol Cashada Laurelie Madsen Customer Service Rep. II Kay Snook Customer Service Rep. III Kim Sechrest Erin Tarkhanian Annette Vedolla Utility Clerk Noma VanHousen (part-time) WAREHOUSE Purchasing and Warehouse Supervisor Nora Kennedy Purchasing Assistant Judy Jenney COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES COMPUTER SUPPORT COORDINATOR (NEW POSITION) PUBLIC S~FETY DEPARTMENT - POLICE DIVISION Director of Public Safety Fred Keplinger Police Captain John Williams Kenneth Budrow Police Sergeant Arthur Barclay Charles Durfee Wayne McBride John McCutcheon Daniel Walker (Detective) Police Officer DISPATCH CENTER Thomas Degerstrom Kevin DeVries Chris Dewey Gregory Heitkamp Peter Hoyle Barry Inman Randall Johnson Sean Kaeser Sammy Marsh David McQueary Jonathan Rhodes Trent Taylor Darren Wojcieszak Justin Wyatt Marcus Young Public Safety Dispatcher Donna Boyd Christel Cash Wendy Cromwell (vacant) Stacey Porter David Salisbury Karin Schimka-Ronk Tracey Souza Police Officer/Detective Greg Baarts Karen Baxman Mariano Guzman POLICE GARAGE Equipment Mechanic Mickey DeWaal Public Safety Office Supervisor Shirley Grover Police Records Clerk JoAnne Salisbury Receptionist/Clerk Typist Tereise McCutcheon (part-time) Parking Enforcement Officer Dorothy Gialdini Myrtle Hausauer (part-time) Community Service Officer Tonya Schillinsky (part-time) Susie Stutsman (part-time) ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER (PART-TIME) (NEW POSITION) PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT - FIRE DIVISION Director of Public Safety Fred Keplinger Fire Operations Chief Roe Sandelin Fire Captain Bruce Evans George Hall Dean Hutton Roger Sprehn Fire Engineer Mark Clark Mark Hilliker Bill Woodworth Michael Woskow Norman (Chuck) Yates Firefighter/EMT Peter Bushby Marc Hafner Alex Simi Bill Webster Administrative Secretary Faye McAfee ~MBUL]~NCE ENTERPRISE Firefighter/EMT Michael Hamilton Terry Isreal Sean McGee Floyd (Skip) Williams COI~UN~TY BERV~CES DEP~RT~ENT Director of Community Services Candace Horsley Community Services Coordinator Tammi Weselsky Museum/Cultural Arts Director Margaret Anne Lane Museum Curator Dot Brovarney Museum Assistant Bette Fairbairn Museum Receptionist Elaine Johnson (part-time) LaRee Keller (part-time) Golf and Parks Superintendent Reed Carpenter Park Maintenance Supervisor Bruce Weselsky Park Maintenance Attendant Jason Gibbs Brad Butterfield (part-time) (vacant) (part-time) Golf Maintenance Leadworker Chuck Watson Golf Maintenance Attendant James Hughes Larry Wise Maintenance Custodian Delbert Madsen Youth Service Ukiah Director Kort Pettersen (p-t) Coordinator Michelle Lee (p-t) (vacant) (p-t) Conference Center/Plaza Manager Bruce Jenney Conf. Center Host/Receptionist/Secretary Kristi Bauer (part-time) Susan Greenfield (part-time) Rosa Taylor (part-time) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director of Public Works/City Engineer Rick Kennedy Public Works Administrator Sue Goodrick ENGINEERING SENIOR Civil Engineer Larry Woods ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER (EIT) (NEW POSITION) Engineering Technician I Paul Ammendolia Sharlene Kaye Thomas McArthur TWO POSITIONS TRANSFERRED TO ELECTRIC AND WATER/SEWER STREETS Public Works Superintendent Jim Looney Public Works Maintenance II Joseph Martin Street Sweeper Operator Edward Totten Public Works Maintenance I Jose Castanon Thomas Glazier David Newsome Fred Scott Roy Yates Donald Fox (part-time) PARTTIME POSITION TO BE FULLTIME GARAGE Equipment Maintenance Supervisor Donald Denham Equipment Mechanic David Burnham Gary Smith PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (CONTINUED) SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE Landfill Supervisor (vacant) Landfill Maintenance Attendant Ray Ferguson Heavy Equipment Operator Jim Hamilton Jeff Norton (part-time) Solid Waste Disposal Site Attendant Matt Froneberger Solid Waste Maintenance Aide Philip Francis Solid Waste Loadchecker Louis Hayden (part-time) AIRPORT Airport Manager Don Bua Airport Assistant Paul Richey Airport Attendants (part-time) Dan Hardeman Brandon Harrison PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER/SE~ER DIVISION Director of Public Utilities Darryl Barnes Water & Sewer Operations Superintendent George Borecky Water & Sewer Maintenance Supervisor Carvet Wiles Water & Sewer Leadworker Walter Dunken WATER TREATMENT PLANT SUPERVISOR Terry Eib WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR (NEW POSITION) (NEW POSITION) Water & Sewer Service Attendant Paul Smith Water & Sewer Attendant II Alan Jamison Gary Dogali Water & Sewer Attendant I Gerald Hopper Ross Mayfield Michael Wieling Treatment Plant Supervisor Frank Noyd Senior Treatment Plant Operator (NEW POSITION) (NEW POSITION) WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR/MECHANIC Jacob Brose Treatment Plant Operator Doug Burica Mike Moore TREATEMENT PLANT OPERATOR IN TRAINING (NEW POSITION) ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I (NEW POSITION) TRANSFER FROM ENGINEERING/ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - ELECTRIC DIVISION Director of Public Utilities Darryl Barnes Electrical Distribution Engineer Martin Wobig Electrical Supervisor Stan Bartolomei Electrical Sub-Supervisor Kevin Maxwell Gerald Meyer Electric Engineering Technician John Yoast Line Attendant Duane Humphrey Danny Jones Robert Kiggins Colin Murphey Philip Montefu Line Attendant Helper Steven Beaman Gary Miller Utility Service Attendant David Eby Meter Reader Linda Johnston Kim Mitchell Meter Reader/Conservation Specialist Jill Scott (part-time) ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I (NEW POSITION) TRANSFER FROM ENGINEERING/ADMINISTRATION METER ATTENDANT (NEW POSITION) -A 0 (J~ (J~ 0 0 C~ 0 --~ Cn l~3 0 Cn I~) 0 ,0 0 0 0 ~ --~ 0 --~ Cn 0 0 z m 133 ITl .-I 0 0 00~ ,0 O0 ',40~ tn 4~ 0 O0 Cn --~ 0 0 0 0 ~ l~3 .-~ 0 ~ 133 CZ ITl o o u~ c~bUbb=~bb~ZbbbbZbb0b~ 0 00~ O~ 0 --d ---~ --~ .1~ --,I -,I .I~, ~,~ -,I 0 0 0 --~ J~, ~.~ 0 0 · . O~ m Z '13 -I m 0 C,O 0') -I~. --~. -,~, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -",~ 0 O'~ CI'~ CI'~ 0 O"~ ,-~ -,,~ ,-~ ,,,,.~ -,~,. 0"~ ,-~ ,.-,~ 0 00~ --~ 0 I~0 ~0 0~00 I[ 0 Youth Service Uldah FY 95-96 Budget Review Fact Sheet for the Ukiah City Council MISSION: to provide opportunities for the youth of the Greater Ukiah Area to learn and develop through active participation in thoughtfully organized service experiences that meet actual community needs. ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 1) provided service opportunities for 150 participants; 2) completed three, eight-week service cycles; summer cycle in-progress; 3) conducted community service in: · Environment: Community Pride, Storm Drain Stenciling, Gibson Creek Restoration, Air Show Clean-up, ADA Playground, Oak Manor tree planting and Russian River Run support; · Homeless/Hunger: Plowshares, Community Garden, and Food Bank; · Seniors: Ukiah Convalescent Hospital and Autumn Care; · Tutoring: Frank Zeek Elementary. 4) conducted leadership development through participation in: ·Alliance for Justice seminar; · Mendocino Area ROPES course; · routine reflection training STRATEGIC FINANCIAL PLANNING: currently developing a 5-year plan to achieve financial independence for the program through sponsorship by local business, service clubs and organizations, individual donations, and foundation grants. Fiscal Year 1995-96 focus areas: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) refine marketing plan; establish a citizen advisory committee; develop local business/organization sponsorship (annual, cycle); cultivate potential donors; investigate and apply for national, state, and local grants; ITl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z r~ 0 0 r" ~o Z ITl 0 Z 0 131 ITl ! ! (.no o o 0 ~O 0 .~, .=~ 0 '-,,I 0 ~=n "-,I I~ --a. -a..,I~. I~ -.~ 0 0 00~ 0 0 0 0 0'~ 0 v vv v v v v v 001 ~O ~O (O O0 O0 O00~ C~ O~ C~ C~ C~ C~ O~ I~J I~O !~O O~ 4~ O -A O O '~i '~! O~ C~ O~ (J~ --~ O0 ~O --~ O O O O O~ I~O -A O~ O CO bO I~) -A O00 O O O G3G30 gg >>7 t- t.- 0 (1) ~- ~ (1:) (1:) 0 (1) ~ =~~o ~o~ ooo O =~ EZ (/3 O O ;O ~ ~ 0 m Om;0o~mzm~;0q c ~~ ~o ~. ~' ~., ~'g~~~ ~ ~oci > -- "'"' {"/} "-- -- -- (/3 ~E ~E~ ~~'I ~-i ~} Z ~' ::r! -n oooo~oo~oo~o rtl m O Z ~ 0 Z -~ I'll ~ rn 0 X ITl --I --I '1:1 --,I ~ ITl ~ I-- Z -..t > m __ ~ z x o ~ ~ m r'- -. =mc m =~o 0 0 O0 I~0 --~ 0 I~0 O0 v v 0~1~ 0 0 O00 ~ <0 0 0 0 .1~, O0 I'0 O~ .=.~ 0 0 O00~ O0 ~ 0 00~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ill Z C m -il .-n (/) -~ 0~ --I "n 00~00 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 00~ 0 0 0 0 O10 0 0 0 O0 03 O0 --~ -,10 0 0 0 I',0 0 0 0 0 o'o o ~'o CO0 0 0 0 ~00000 0 O00 ~ 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 <0 0 0 O00 cn 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0~.0 0 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .~:.:.:.:11~¢.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ::::::::::::::::::::::::: i.:.:.:.::i:!: . .:.:.:¢~,¢.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. .................. :.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:, -:.:1.:.:.: ':':':':':':':':':':':':~ :::::::::::: ::::::::::::::~1~::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~-:,~::::: .' .¥: · .......... :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:::::::::: :~ti:i:~:~:~:i~:~ !...:E:i:~Ei:F-:.:: :~:::::~:::i::~*: ~::. ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:~:::::.'.'.'.:: ::::::::::: :..':::::::~::: ::::::::::: ~:~1':::::::~: :E:::::: ~, Z =1'1 330 =================================== : ...:':';1~1<':':':':':':-: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :::::::::: ======================= :.:.;.:.:. :i:i:!:i:i:i:il~i · :.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.;-: :.:t.:.:. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :'J?lS:::::;J~::: :::::::::::: :~:::::::.~.'::: :i:i:i:i:!:!:i:!:i:i:i:~ :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::: :. '::::::::~c::: ~{~:::::::"3~:::: :::::::::: · :::::~:::: ::....: ...~..'::::::~:::~ ::....:::: :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: .-q i'. ::.:...i:i:i:~i.~l~:i:i:::i:i:i:i:i :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i:~:~:i:i:i:~:!:i:i:i:i:!:!:!:i:i:i':: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~:i:i.:~?!:!:!:!:i:i:i: : ...:-:-:1~1~':-:-:':':':':': ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .................. ......... ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::i::::: · :.:+:.:.:.:+:.:.:.: .:.:1~.:.:. ::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: :-::1:::::: :~::::..~..~: :J,!'~:::::~::: ::::::::::: :~l:::::::;i~l~: ::::::::::::::::::::::: :.;.:.:.:.: ::::::::::: :::~.~::::::~:: ::::::::::: ::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :i:i::::::: :.;.:.:.:.;.;.:.:.:.;.; :.;.:.;.:.; :: :::::::::.:.:.:: :~.,.,.,.~: :~:::::~::: :~.~: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :i::::::::: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: :.:.:.:.:.: :.:.:+:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:+:.:.:.. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i:~:E:i:E:i:i:i:!:i:i:!:i:!:i:i:!: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:+:.:.: :::::::::::::::ii. If:: :.:::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .................. ............ .........., ...... ...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: :.:.:.:.:... :::::::::::::::::::::::: :;::::::::.; . ..... -,:,:,:.., ~: ~ z ~ ::~ z zO ~ ~ ... ~ ::~ :::::::::::::::::::::: ...... ............ q _c ..,....... ~0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 00 O0 ~ ~ O0 00 O0 0 ~ 00 ~000~ 00 00 O0 0 000 00000 O0 oo oo o :~oo ~ooo~o~ oo oo o ~oo oooooo~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0~00~ ~~~0~0~0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ O0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~~oo~~o ~b~b ~o~ooooooo ~oo~ooo~oo ~o~ooooooo ooooooooooo ~~bb~m~o ~o~o b~b~' ' ~ ~ 0 ~0~0000000 ~ 00~000~ O0 ~0~ O000000 00000000000 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o. . . .~ ~ ~ ~. q ~ ~ ~ ~ o. . ~~oo~~o ~b~b o~o~o ~ 0 ~ 0000000 ~ 00 ~000 ~ 00 ~ 0 ~ 0000000 O0 O00000 O00 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::iil~:: '":':-:':': ¢::.1::.::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: ................. ::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;,:.:.: ;.:.:.:.:. ::::::::::::::::~:: i~! :::::::::::::::::::::::::: .-....,v, ::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:.:.:.:.: · :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:..,.:,:,:.:. :::::::::::: :.:.:.:,:.: :::::;::::: .v.v... i:i:i:i:i:i:~:i:i:i:i:i: :.:i:i:i:': i~!iiii~ :'::::::::: ?.. '!:!:Et~i: ...... ::::1~::::: · .-.......-.-.,.....-....:.:.:.:.: · .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: :.:.:.:.:.~ '1'1 '1'1 ITlIT1 Z Z -'ri, 21~, ...~ 0 c.n 0'~ o~ 0000 O0 I,O 0 o'~ 0 C~ o'~ .l~ .-~ 00 ':':':':': Z ~ ~ ~ m ':':':':':' ::~ ~:::: m 0 ~ ~ m m -- m m . m - ~m m m ~ ~m ~m ~::~:: ~:: ::~::~ ~ ::~ ~:: ::::~:::: :::~:~:~ ::::~::~ :::::::::::~ :E:~:E ] :.:-:-:<.:. . .... :::::::::::: ::::::::::.: :E:~:~:~:~ :':':':':': · '-'.'-'.? ;.~.:.~.~,.: .,.,.,.,-, , ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 I~O00000~O~O~O ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O00000 0000000000000 O0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~~~ 0 ~OOm~ ~0~~ 0 O0000 ~000000~000000 ~ O00000 ~00000000000000 ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000 0 ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ O0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ b b~ ~ ~ ooo ~m ~o ~ 0 00~0 0~~000~~000~00 ~ 0 0000 0000000000000000 ~ 0~00~0 0~~000~~000~00 ~! O00000 0000000000000000 ~ o b ~ ~ ;~ bbb ~ ~ ~ ~b 0~00~0 ~~000~~000~00 ~ 0 O0000 O00000000000000 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .................. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ................... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Z:!:!:!:E:i:!:!:~:!:!:!:!:!:!:i:i:i:i i:!:i:!:E:i:!i'D!: :,:i:!Si: :.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:,:.;.: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: :.:.~:,:.: :::::::::::::::~: :.:.:.:.:,: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:~ .;.:.:.:.: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:,:.~ i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:!: :::::::::: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.: ........... :::::::::::::~:: :::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: .;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.j .v.v.v.v.v.v.v.v.v ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ;::::::::::. :0:::::::::::...::: :'., .:::::::J~::: ..... :::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: l =~o.~.~ o =..'~ ~ '~ ""4 ~'o~' 0 ~o~ ~ 0 . · 5. o~ , 0 ~ ~ om.-~~ 0 o ~ 0 From: DonaJd Young III To: Fred Keplinger Dale: 7/10/95 Time: 13:48:44 Page 2 ol 2 LLI z 0 0 1,1,1 i- 1,1.1 0 C o o ~1 o -,--, · 0 0 0 0 o 0 I.o o o TABLE I Comparison of Planning Department Fee Schedules APPLICATION UKIAH REDDING PARADISE Parcel Map $225 $545 $985~ Major Subdiv -$700 $2220 $1400 Use Permit $125-$450 $240-$1620 $375-$1070 Variance $125-$225 $310-$465 $590-$750 Site Plan Rev $150 $440-$1470 $330-$750 GP Amendment $600 $1280-$5490 $1340 Rezone : $325 $890-$3550 $1280 Appeal $0 $85-$145 $36-365 APPLICATION UKIAH CLAREMONT CARSON Parcel Map $225 $2500 + Dep $2000 Major Subdiv $700 $4000 + Dep $2000 Use Permit $125-$450 $2500 + Dep $1500 Variance $125-$225 $1000 + Dep $1000 Site Plan Rev $150 $500-$4000 - GP Amendment $600 $4000 + Dep $2500 Rezone $325 $3500 + Dep $2500 Appeal $0 50% of App Fee $300-$1000 APPLICATiON UKIAH HEALDSBURG MENDOCINO COUNTY Parcel Map $225 $1,500 $1,685 Major Sub $700 Consult Fee $3,610 Use Permit $125-$450 $800 + $635-$1,475 Variance $125-$225 $300 $610 Site Plan Rev $150 $600 ~ $620 GP Amendment $600 Consult Fee $2,035 Rezone ' -$325 Cor~sult Fee $800 Appeal $0 $150 $300-$600 Consultant Fee: The City hims, at the expense of the applicant, a consultant to process large project applications. The applicant is required to deposit 120% of the consultant's fee (actual cost plus administrative fee). This fee is for a minOr use permit. Major Use Permits are jobbed out to a consultant at the applicant's expense. ~ T_ABL__E 2_ Planning Permit Fees Percentage Differences: Ukiah, Cloverdale & Willits APPLICATION UKIAH CLOVERDALE Difference Parcel Map $225 $515 56.3% Major Sub $700 $750 + $20/Iot 6.7% Use Permit $125-$400 $400 68.5% / 0% Variance $125-$225 $180 30.5% / -25% site Plan Rev' - $150 $800 ' 81.3% GP Amendment $600 $845 29.0% Rezone $325 $340 4.2% Appeal $0 $75 75.0% AVERAGE: 40.8% Higher APPLICATION Parcel Map Major Sub Use Permit Variance Site Plan Rev UKIAH $225 $7O0 $125-$400 $125-$225 $150 WILLITS $350 + $50/Iot $750 + $50/Iot $160-$500 $160 $125-$250 Difference 35.7% 6.7% 20.5% -8.5% 20.0% GP Amendment $600 $500 - 16.8% Rezone $325 $400 18.8% Appeal :' $0 $100 100.0% AVERAGE: 22.0% Higher CITY OF UKIAH FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 BUDGET CONTROLLER POSITION - FINANCE DEPARTMENT Base Salary $40,000 Position to come on line September 1; Benefits (35% of Sal) $14,000 personnel costs only for 3/4 of a year. Total Pers Costs $54,000 Computer $2,000 Personnel Costs @ .75% $40,500 Office Furniture $800 Miscellaneous Costs $3,100 Misc Support $300 Total Misc Costs $3,100 Estimated total costs $43,600 Total Position Costs $57,100 Reimbursable Credits in Finance Department are 41.5% Amt. to General Fund $25,506 Amt. to Enterprise $18,094 Monies from General Fund accounts to fund new position: Fund/Account :Department Action From To Net 100-1001-160 City Council Delete 3 Monterey Attendance $10,275 $7,815 $2,460 100-1201-160 City Manager Delete Monterey Attendance $4,660 $3,840 $820 100-1301-250 Finance Delete portion of special projects $50,000 $45,100 $4,900 100-1301-255 Finance Reduce Lease Purchase $31,000 $30,476 $524 100-1905-690 Secretarial PI Delete Optical Image Comp Link $2,235 $1,735 $500 100-1945-651 Com Outreach Reduce "Other City Publications" $3,000 $1,500 $1,500 100-1945-651 Com Outreach Reduce "Newspaper advertising" $1,000 $500 $500 100-2101-250 Fire Delete "BRC Software Contract $15,712 $11,612 $4,100 TOTAL of proposed changes in General Fund to fund new postion $15,304 Monies assigned to Enterprise Funds for new position Fund & Account !Department % (Reimbursable Credit) !$ Amount 800-3765-291 Electric 23.5 $10,246 697-1305-291 Billing & Coil 3.6 $1,570 820-3901-291 Water 2.7 $1,1 77 660-3401-291 Solid Waste 2.7 $1,1 77 612-3500-291 Sewer 1.7 $741 678-2040-291 Dispatch 1.3 $567 220-4600-291 Parking Dist 1 $436 680-5201-291 Ambulance I $436 600-5001-291 Airport 1 $436 695-6120-291 Golf 1 $436 696-1390-291 Purch/Ware 1 $436 575-5800-291 Garage I $436 Total from Enterprise Funds $18,094 CONTROL.XLS 7/11/95 8:33 AM mfh m ~;~0 _9_o · -- ~w- .-..= .~ .--, .e p.p o-,,, =--,,e ~ ~" '-' p9,.-o ~ ~- o- =.- - - ~ ~. t'~ t~) · -. = ~..,;e = ~ ~'"-n,-.- (~ '-n '-, c 0 '~ o-o'o e ~-.-, · =__, ~- _, ~- ~, =-~ -% -~ 0 ~(~' ~D (1) ,.-,.~ < ~ .'F ~ 2'o r- o .~ ~ ~. ?m' _~ o,,~ -, ~ ~_~ o (~ B ~ ~-~ _~ o-n ~>~ ~ _o ~ ~ ="~' o o >5.~ ~ ~ ~ ~.'o o - -~ ~-~, 0 ::3 -6~ 0 ,,.~ :3 i 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ -=o DATE: May 23, 1995 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Charles L. Rough, Jr., City Manag~er/? Bob Sawyer, Planning Director ~¢~kt,"~ IN-HOUSE PLAN CHECKING SERVICES'AND RELATED BUDGET ISSUES Pursuant to your request, I have performed a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the in-house plan checking function. As you and the Council are well aware, the City upgraded Carl Tuliback's employment status from half time code enforcement duties to full time code enforcement and in-house building plan checking duties. This change occurred commensurate with Fiscal Year 94/95, and the results are as follows. Quantitative Evaluation As of April 30, 1995, the Building Division took in $18,547 in plan checking fees, and paid out in private consultant services $17,895, resulting in a net "benefit" of $652. (It should be noted that plan checking fees constitute 65% of the total building permit fees collected.) Of the $17,895 paid out in consultant services, $12,056 went to Morton/Phillips Inc. for structural engineering review, and $5,839 went to Don Jamison for standard plan checking. Morton/Phillips Inc. is the City's reviewing authority for structural engineering and energy calculations, both of which are specialties requiring outside support. Don Jamison was the City's standard plan checker until very early in FY 94/95, and is no longer involved in any aspect of the plan check process. During the same period, which represents 83% of an entire fiscal year, our in-house plan checker (Carl Tuliback) took in $6,'927 for plan checking services. It is important to bear in mind that the $5,839 paid to Don Jamison for plan checking services would have been, under current and typical circumstances, credited to Carl Tuliback, since Carl has totally assumed all of the plan checking functions previously performed by Jamison. Thus, the total amount which would have been captured by in-house plan checking amounts to $12,766 for the cited fiscal year period. The $5,839 amount paid to Jamison represents review of early FY 94/95 projects which were large in scope and scale (notably County Admin. Ctr. and K-Mart), and which, at the time, were considered too time- and detail-sensitive to assign to the new in-house plan checker. This condition was unique, short lived, and will not be repeated now that Carl Tuliback is fully acclimated to the plan checking function, and procedurally reviewing all building plans submitted. standard plan checking creates economies of scale which otherwise could not be achieved by two half-time sources, and the result is that more gets accomplished. Having Carl on premises also provides more flexibility for the Building Inspector, as well as increases service to the community. In the past, if Clif Shepard became ill and had to miss work, nobody was available to fill in for him on short notice, and typically Building Division business, both in the office and in the field, ceased until Clif returned. Similarly, when Clif wanted to take a vacation, we had to hire a temporary Building Inspector, which often times interrupted continuity and efficiency in the process. Now, however, Carl can and does fill in for Clif on a moment's notice with no impact or interruption to daily business or scheduled field inspections, and Clif can take Vacation without having to plan months in advance to assure that a replacement is available. Recommendations Regardless of whether plan checking is performed in-house by a City employee, or by a private consultant, the key deficiency in the cost/revenue equation is the City's woefully outdated building permit fee schedule, and its attendant valuation table. As I have stated in the past, the City of Ukiah utilizes the 1982 Uniform Building Code in relation to fees, which is inadequate to cover plan checking and building inspection expenses no matter who performs either service. Indeed, the UBC's 1982 fee schedule is generally 75% to 85% lower than those contained in the 1991 UBC, and the disparity is profoundly greater using the very recently published 1994 UBC, whereby the difference is roughly 150% between the '82 and '94 Codes. By updating the fee schedule, which I strongly recommend, the City can better cover the costs associated with the plan checking and building inspection functions, and avoid having to subsidize these budgets with general funds each and every year. I have attached the fee schedules and valuation tables from the three test years to better establish the overview I have herein provided. I have also included a table which identifies four typical City projects and computes the differences in building permit fees to underscore the dramatic changes in fees from 1982 to 1991 and 1994. For background information, building permit fees are calculated by cross referencing the value of construction to a fee schedule, both of which are established by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). The fee schedule is established and updated every 3 years in ICBO's Uniform Building Code (UBC), which the City must utilize in assessing building plans and projects once it is adopted by the State. The "Building Valuation Data" tables are established, and more frequently updated, in ICBO's professional publication entitled Building Standards. The "valuation" tables contain groups of building types, such as "dwellings", "restaurants", "warehouses", "offices", and so on, and each general category is further refined according to the methods and materials used in construction, all of which are correlated to a cost per square foot. The total valuation is then cross referenced to the fee schedule, wherein a total fee is derived. Once a building permit fee is established on any given construction project, 65% of the total is dedicated to plan checking, and the remaining 35% is dedicated to processing and field inspection costs. By using the outdated valuation tables and fee schedule for the generation of revenue to cover costs, and yet paying plan checkers and building inspectors according to current rates, one can see how the City typically (and needlessly) subsidizes the building inspection function every budget year. For example, referring to the costs and revenues associated with FY 93/94 cited above (last full fiscal year for comparison purposes), the City took in $14,359 in plan check fees, which represents 65% of the total fees collected, and paid out $15,429 in plan checking fees. If we had been using the 1991 fee schedule, we would have collected conservatively 70% more in fees for plan checking or a total of $24,400 compared to the $14,359 actually received based on the 1982 Code. Accordingly, we should either raise the fees, as outlined and recommended, or continue to experience a shortfall of revenues to expenditures, regardless of the source of our plan checking. 0 0 0 · · 0 o 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 · -i~, (D --I CD 0 0 0 rtl 0 rtl ITl ITl ITl 307, 3-A 1982 UBC UNIFORM BUILDING CODE hazard will result from occupancy of any building or portion thereof before the same is completed, he may issue a temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the use of a portion or portions of a building or structure prior to the completion of the entire building or structure. (e) Posting. The Certificate of Occupancy shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises and shall not be removed except by the building official. (f) Revocation. The building official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a Certificate of Occupancy issued under the provisions of this code whenever the certificate is issued in error, or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or when it is determined that the building or structure or portion thereof is in violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this code. TABLE NO. 3-A--BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $10.00 S 1.00 to $500.00 5501.00 to $2,000.00 52,001.00 to $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 5100,001.00 and up $ !0.00 for the first $500.00 plus $1.50 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $32.50 for the first $2,000.00 plus $6.00 for each addi- tional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $170.50 for the first $25,000.00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fractiou thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $283.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $ 1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $433.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $2..50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours ................... $15.00 per hour (minimum charge--two hours) 2. Reinspecti6n fee assessed under provisions of Section 305 (g) ............................................. $15.00 each 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated ............................................... $15.00 per hour (minimum charge--one-half hour) 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans ............................... $15.00 per hour (minimum charge---one-hal f hour) UUIILill I~ 1982 Valuation Data o 32 Building Valuation Data At the request of numerous building officials, Building Standards offers the following building valuation data representing average costs Ior most buildings. Because residential buildings are the most common ior many cities, two general classes are considered for these, one for 'average" construction and the other for 'good." ^diustments should be made for special architectural or structural features and location of the project. Often high- er or lower unit costs may result. The unit costs are intended to comply with the de/inK tion of "valuation" in Section 423 Bt the Uniiorm Build- ing Code and thus include architectural, structural, elec- trical, plumbing; and mechanical work. except as soecifically listed below. It also includes the contractor's profit which should not be omitted. The determination of plan check fees for projects reviewed by Ihe Inlernational Conlerence of Building Officials will be based on valuation computed from these figures. Cost per July, 1982 Square Foot Occupancy and Type Good Average 1. APARTMENT HOUSES: 'Type I or II F.R ........... S62.40 52.10 Type V--Masonry (or Type III) ........... 48.00 39.10 Type V--Wood Frame ... Type I--Basement Garage 2. BANKS: 'type I or II F.R ........... 87.70 Type II1--I .Flour ........ 71.20 Type III--N ............. 67.90 Type V--I-Hour ........ 62.30 Type V--N ............. 59.60 3. BOWLING ALLEYS: Type III--l-Hour ........ 34.50 Type III--N ............ .. 32.90 Type V--1 -Hour ........ 3 ! .20 41.40 34.30_ 22.30 4. CIIURCHES: B, pe I or II F.R ........... 57.40 Type II1--I-Hour ........ 47..50 Type III--N ............. 45.30 Type V--l-Hour ........ 42.90 Type V--",: ............. 40.90 5. CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: 'l'ype I or II F.R ........... 81.30 Type III--i-Hour ........ 65.80 Type V--1-Hour ........ 59.60 6. DWELLINGS: · Type V--~4asonry ....... 55.20 41.00 Type V~Wood Frame ... S1.60 37.50 Basements--. Finished ............. 15.60 11.60 Unfinished ........... 11.30 8.20 7. HOSPITALS: 'Type I or II F.R ........... 97.00 Type II1~1 -Hour ........ ' 90.50 Type V~!-Hour ........ 82.90 8. HOTELS AND MOTELS: 'Type I or II F.R ........... 59.90 ~43e II1--1 -Hour ........ S 1.2'0 Type 111--,'4 ............. 49.30 Type V--l-Hour ........ 44.70 Type V--N ............. 42.80 9. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Type I or II F.R ........... 35.20 Type II~t-Hour ........ 23.00 Type 11--4Stock) ......... 21.90 Type II1~1-Hour ........ 28.40 Type III--N ............. 24.30 Tilt-up ................. 17.80 Type V~l-Hour ........ 22.60 Type V~N ............. 21 .$0 10. MEDICAL OFFICES: 'Type I or II F.R ........... 72.90 Type II1--1-Hour ........ 58.20 Type III~N ............. 55.50 Type V--I-Hour ........ 53.70 Type V--N ............. S 1.60 11. OFFICES: 'Type I or II ER ........... 64.60 Type III--l-Hour ........ 46.70 Type 111--,"4 ............. 44.70 Type V--1-Hour ........ 41.30. Type V--.N ............. - 39.30 12. PRIVATE GARAGES: --' Wood Frame ........... 12.00 Masonry ............... 16.00 Open Carports .......... 7.00 13. PUBLIC GAR.AGES: 'Type I or II F.R ........... 29.00 Type II--N ............. 19.00 Type II1~I-Hour ........ 23.00 Type III~N ............. 19.00 Type V~i -Hour ........ 18.80 14. RESTAURANTS: Type II1~I -Hour ~ ....... 58.90 Type III--N ............. 54.30 Type V--1 -Hour ........ S 1.00 Type V~N .............. 47.60 15. STORES: ' 'Type I or II F.R ........... 48.80 Type Ill--l-Hour ........ 37.10 Type III--N ............. 35.30 Type V~I -Hour .... :... 31 .?0' Type V--N" 29.50: 16. SCtlOOLS: Type I or II F.R ........... 72.60: Type IIl~l-Hour ......... 51.00 Type III--N ............. · 48.70 Type V--l-Hour ......... 45.90 17. SERVICE STATIONS: Type II--N ............. 44.00 Type III--l-Hour ........ 47.90 Type V--l-Hour ........ 30.30 Canopies .............. 15.20 18. THEATERS: Type I or II F.R ............ 67.40 Type II1~1-Flour ........ 49.,10 Type III~N ............. 46.70 Type V--I-Hour ........ ,14.10 K, pe V--N ............. 41.90 19. WAREHOUSES: Type I or II F.R ........... 30.20 Type II or V--l-Hour .... 19.80 Type II or V--N ......... ~ 7.30 Type III--l-Hour ........ 22.00 Type III--N ............. 19.30 EQUIPMENT AIR CONDITIONING: Commercial ............ Res,dential ............. '~ 40 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS .... ~_~... Regional Modifiers The iollowine modifiers are recommended ior use ~n COnlunchon ~,v~th the Building Valuation Data. In a(ldi. t~on. certain local condilions mav require iunher mndil~- cations. To use these modiiiers merely muhiplv Ihe lisled cost per square mot by Ihe appropriale regional modifier. For examole: To adjust cost Bi a Tvpe V-N o/rice buildinl~ Bi avera,~e construcuon lot Ihe ~e,.v Mexico area. selecl Rel~ional Modiiier 0.80 and unit cosl irom Valuation Data. S39. 0.80 x S39.30 = S31.44 {adjusted cost per square iOOtl Eastern Uniled States Modifier Connecticut .................. 0.88 Delaware .................... 0.86 District o/Columbia ........... 0.87 Florida ....................... 0.78 Geor§ia ...................... 0.75 Maine ....................... 0.83 Maryland .................... 0.81 Massachusetts ................ 0.89 New Hampshire .............. 0.81 New Jersey ................... 0.91 New York New York City .......... 1.00 Other .................. 0.89 North Carolina ................ 0.73 Pennsylvania Philadelphia ............ 0.91 Other .................. 0.88 Rhode Island ................. 0.90 South Carolina ................ 0.73 Vermont ..................... 0.81 Virginia ...................... 0.77 West Virginia ................. 0.88 Central United Slates Alabama ..................... 0.7~ Arkansas ..................... 0.76 Illinois ....................... 0.91 Indiana ...................... 0.85 Iowa ........................ 0.8.5 Kansas ....................... 0.81 Kenlucky ...................... 0.84 Louisiana .................... 0.83 Michigan .................... 0.90 ' Minnesola ..................... 0.89 Mississippi ................... 0.74 Missouri ...... : .............. 0,83 Nebraska .................... 0.82 North Dakota ................. 0,87 Ohio ........................ 0,88 Oklahoma ................... 0,8 I Soulh Dakota ................. 0,84 Tennessee .................... 0,78 Texas ........................ 0,;'9 Wisconsin .................... 0.8," Western United Stales Alaska ....................... 1.36 Arizona ...................... 0.9 I California Los Angeles ............ 1.00 Lake.Tahoe ............. 1.03 San Francisco ........... 1.05 'OIher .................. 0.99 Colorado ..................... 0.87 Hawaii ...................... 1.20 Idaho ........................ 0.85 Mon{ana ..................... 0.04 Nevada ...................... 0.95 New Mexico .................. 0.80 Oregon ...................... 0.9 I Utah ........................ 0.81 WasHington .................. 0.96 Wyom.ing .................... 0.88 3-A 1991 UBC 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TABLE NO. 3-A--BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1 .00 to $500.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $ i 00,001.00 to $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $15.00' $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.00 for each'addi- tional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $45.00 for the 'first $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for each addi- tional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $6.50 for each additional $ !,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and includ- ing $50,000.00 $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for each addi- tional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $639.50 for the first $ 100,000.00 plus $3.50 for each ad- ditional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $3,539.50 for the first $ ! ,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fees: !. Inspections outside of normal business hours ............. $30.00 per hour* (minimum charge-two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305 (g) ..................................... $30.00 per hour* 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated ....... $30.00 per hour* (minimum charge--one-half hour) 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans ......................... $30.00 per hour* Oninimum charge---one-half hour) *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equip~nent, h.ourly wages and fringe benefits of the e~npioyees in- volved. ' 20 1991 ULi tCllJ g Yaiuat o laata At the requesl of numerous building officials, Budding Standards offers the following building valuation data representing average costs lot most buildings. Because reg,~ential buildings are the most common lot many cities, two general classes are considered [or these, one for "average" construction and tt'~e other [o~ "good." Adjuslments should be made [or special architectural or structural feattues anti the location of the project. Higher o~ lower unit costs may often resull. The unil costs are intended to comply with the definition of "valuation" in Section 423 of the Uniform Building Code~r~ and thus include architectural, struc- tural, elect~ical~ plumbing and mechanical work, except as specifically listed below. The unit costs also include Ihe contractor°s p~cdit, which should not be omilled. The determination of plan check fees for projecls reviewed by the International Conierence of Building Officials will be based on valuation computed from Ihese figures which were compiled in April '1991. Cosl per Cost per Cost per Cost per Square Fool, Square Foot, Square Foot, Square Foot, Oct-up,,ney ,~ncl Type Average Occupancy and Type Average Occul:~ncy and Type Average Occupancy and Type Aver~,§e 1. APARTMENT HOUSES: Type I or II F.R.' ....... $ 70.40 (Good) $85.80 Type V~Masonry (or Type III) .......... 56.00 (Good) $69.70 Type V--Wood Frame ... 49.80 (Good) $63.00 Type I--Basement Garage 29.50 2. AUDITORIUMS: Type I or II F.R ........... 82.60 Type I1~1-Hour ......... 58.60 Tvpe II~N ............. 55.70 Type IIl~l-Hour ........ 62.70 Type III~N ............. 59.80 Type V~I-Hour ........ 57.50 Type V~N ............. 54.70 3. BANKS: Type I or II F.R.' ........ 118.20 Type I1~1-Hour ......... 84.90 Type II~N ............ 80.90 Type II1~1-Flour ........ 96.30 Type III~N ............. 9 i .90 Type V~I-Hour ........ 84.90 Type V--N ............. 80.80 4. BOWLING ALLEYS: Type I1~I-Hour ......... 39.50 Type II--N ............. 37.70 Type II1~1-Hour ....... 43.30 Type III~N ............. 41.30 Type V~I-Flour ........ 36.90 5. CHURCHES: Type I or II F.R ........... 78.00 Type I1--1-Hour ......... 58.30 Type II--N ............. 55.40 Type III--l-Hour ........ 62.60 Type III~N ............. 59.60 Type V--1-Hour ........ 56.90 Type V--N ............. 54.20 6. CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: Type I or II F.R.' ........ 110.60 Type II1~1-Hour ....... 78.90 Type V~I-Hour ........ 71.00 7. DWELLINGS: Type V--Masonry ....... 59.90 (Good) $76.80 Type V~Wood Frame ... 51.50 (Good) $72.90 Basements-- Semi-Finished ......... 16.00 (Good) $18.20 Unfinished ............. 12.00 (Good) $14.10 8. FIRE STATIONS: Type I or II F.R .......... 90.40 Type I1--1-Hour ........ 58.60 Type II--N ............. 55.70 Type II1~1-Hour ........ 65.20 Type III~N ............ 61.90 Type V~I-Hour ........ 58.30 Type V~N ............. 55.40 9. HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY: Type I or II F.R .......... 81.60 Type I1~1-Hour ........ 65.40 'lype II--N ............. 62.30 lype II1~1-Flour ........ 68.20 Type III--N ............ 6.5.20 Type V~I-Hour ........ 65.00 Type V--N ............. 61.80 10. HOSPITALS: Type I or II F.R.* ....... 129.60 Type II1~1 -Hour ....... 107.80 Type V--1 -Flour ....... 100.00 11. HOTELS AND MOTELS: Type I or II F.R.* ........ 81.00 Type II1~1-Hour ........ 69.90 Type III~N ............ 66.60 Type V--1 -I'lour ........ 61.00 Type V~N ............. 58.20 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Type I or II F.R .......... 44.90 Type I1--1-Flour ........ 30.60 Type II--(Slock) ......... 29.00 Type III--l-Hour ........ 33.80 Type III--N ............ 32.30 Till-up ................. 22.70 Type V~I-Hour ........ 30.50 Type V~N ............. 28.80 13. JAILS: Type I or II F.R .......... 126.70 Type II1--1 -Hour ....... 115.20 Type V~I-Hour ........ 82.80 14. LIBRARIES: Type I or II F.R .......... 92.80 Type I1~1-Hour ........ 64.90 Type II~N ............. 61.60 Type II1~1-Hour ....... 70.60 Type III--N ............ 67.20 Type V~I-Hour ........ 63.30 Type V~N ............ 60.30 15. MEDICAL OFFICES: Type I or II F.R.* ........ 94.80 Type I1~1-Hour ........ 70.50 Type II~N ............. 67.20 Type II1~I -Hour ....... 77.10 Type III~N ............ 73.60 Type V~I-Hour ........ 71 .B0 Type V~N ............ 67.90 16. OFFICES'*: Type I or 11 F.R.' ........ 84.90 Type II~l-I-lour ........ 55.00 Type II--N ............. 52.40 Type II1~1-Hour ....... 60.50 Type III~N ............ 57.70 Type V~I-Hour ........ 56.00 Type V--N ............ 53.40 17. PRIVATE GARAGES: Wood Frame ........... 18.30 Masonry .............. 21.70 Open Carports ......... 13.10 18. PUBLIC BUILDINGS: Tvpe I or II F.R.' ........ 98.90 Type I1~1-Hour ........ 73.80 Type II--N ............. 70.50 Type II1~1-Hour ....... 82.60 Type III~N ............ 78.90 Type V~I-Hour ........ 73.00 Type V--N ............ 7O.00 19. PUBLIC GARAGES: Type I or II F.R.° ........ 39.00 Type I or II Open Parking* 30.50 Type II--N ............. 22.90 Type II1--1-Flour ....... 27.50 Type III-N ............. 26.30 Type V~i-Hour ....... 22.80 20. RESTAURANTS: Type II1~1-Hour ....... 73.70 Type III~N ............ 70.20 Type V~I-Hour ....... 65.30 Type V--N ............ 62.20 21. SCHOOLS: Type I or II F.R .......... 88.70 Type I1--1-Hour ........ 63.20 Type II1~1-Hour ....... 63.70 Type III~N ............ 60.40 Type V--1-Hour ....... 58.30 Type V--N ............ 55.20 22. SERVICE STATIONS: Type II--N ............ 52.60 Type II1--1-Hour ....... 52.80 Type V--1-Flour ....... 46.40 Canopies .............. 20.30 23. STORES: Type I or II F.R.' ........ 66.40 Type II~l-Hour ........ 40.00 Type II--N ............ 39.20 Type II1--1-Hour ....... 48.90 Type III--N ............ 46.10 Type V--1-14our ....... 39.00 Type V--N ............ 36.50 24. THEATERS: Type I or II F.R .......... 86.50 Type II1~1-Hour ....... 62.70 Type III--N ............ 59.70 Type V~I-Hour ....... 56.50 Type V~N ............ 54.00 25. WAREHOUSES'°*:. Type I or II F.R .......... 39.30 TypellorV~1-Hour ... 23.20 Type II or V--N ........ 21.90 Type II1--1-Hour ....... 26.70 Type III~N ............ 25.50 EQUIPMENT AIR CONDITIONING: Commercial .......... 3.40 Residential ........... 2.80 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS .... 1.60 'Add 0.5 percent io Iolal cost for each story over three. **Oed0¢t 20 percent/or shell-only buildings. '"Oeducl I 1 percenl for mini-warehouses. REGIONAL MODIFIERS The following modifiers are recommended for use in conjunction with the I~uilding valuation data. In addition, cerlain local condilions may require further modifications. To use these modifiers, merely multiply Ihe listed cost per square foot by the appropriale regional modifier. For example, lo adjust the cost of a Type II1~1-Flour holel building of average construclion for tl~e Iowa area, select Regional Modifier 0.80 and unit cosl fiom valualion data, $69.90. 0.110 X 69.90 -= S55.90 (adjusted cost per square foot) Eastern U.S. Modifier Connecticut ............. 0.95 Delaware ............... 0.84 Districl of Columbia ...... 0.87 Florida .............. ~., 0.74 Georgia ................. 0.68 Maioe .................. 0.81 Maryland ............... 0.79 Massachusetts ........... 0.94 New Hampshire ......... 0.82 New Jersey .............. 0.9 I New York New York Cily ......... 1.16 Other ................ 0.87 Norlh Carolina ........... 0.70 Eastern U.S. (cont.) Modifier Pennsylvania Philadelphia .......... 0.96 Other ................ 0.83 Rhode Island ............ 0.94 Soulh Carolina .......... 0.70 Vermont ................ 0.80 Virginia ................. 0.73 West Virginia ............ 0.82 Cenlral U.S. Alabama ............... 0.72 Arkansas ............... 0.70 Illinois ................. 0.87 Indiana ................. 0.82 Iowa ................... 0.80 Kansas ................. 0.74 Central U.S. Modifier Kentucky ............... 0.77 Louisiana ............... 0.78 Michigan ............... 0.84 Minnesota .............. 0.86 Mississippi .............. 0.71 Missouri ................ 0.78 Nebraska ............... 0.75 Norlh Dakota ........... 0.80 Ohio .................. 0.80 Oklahoma .............. 0.71 South Dakota ........... 0.78 Tennessee .............. 0.72 Texas .................. 0.74 \Visconsin .............. 0.85 Alaska ................. 1.30 Western U.S. Modifier Arizona ................. 0.82 California Los Angeles ........... 1.00 San Francisco .......... 1.13 Other ................. 0.94 Colorado ................ O.fll Hawaii ................. 1.14 Idaho ................... 0.80 Montana ................ 0.79 Nevada ................. 0.89 New Mexico ............ 0.76 Oregon ................. 0.83 U~ah ................... 0.75 Washington ............. 0.88 Wyoming ............... 0.BO BUILDING STANDARDS/tUtarch-April, 1991 51 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1994 UBC 1-A TABLE 1-A--BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 tO $500.00 $22.00 $501.00 to $2.000.00 $22.00 for the first $500.00 plus S2.75 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $63.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus S!2.50 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,0(10.00 $352.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, lo and including $50.000.00 $50,001.00 to $ I00.0OO.00 $580.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $6.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100.O01.(X) to S500.000.00 $895.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof $500.00 i.00 to $ i .000.000.00 $2.855.00 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1.000.00 $1,000.001.00 and up $4,955.00 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $1,000,000.00, or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fees: !. Inspections outside of normal business hours ................................... $42.00 per hour* (minimum charge--iwo hours) 2. Rein.qpection fees assessed under provisions of Scclion 108.8 ............................................................ $42.00 per hour* 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicmcd ............................. $42.00 per hour* (minimum charge---one-half hour) 4. Additional plan review required by changes, addilions or revisions to plans ....................................................... $42.00 per hour* {minimum charge--one-half hour) 5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both ......................................................... Actual costs** *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is thc greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead. equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits or the c~nployees involved. **Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.