Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-12-06 PacketCITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 December 6, 1995 6:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance 3. Proclamation Congratulating the Ukiah Junior Pop Warner Football Team for Winning a Playoff Berth in the Pop Warner National Championship Games in Orlando, Florida 4. Approval/Correction of Minutes of Regular Meeting of November 15, 1995 o . . RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Approve Cancellation of Regular Council Meeting of January 3, 1996 Due to Holidays b. Award of Bid for 4" Portable Sewer Pump to Thomas and Associates in the Amount of $14,988.19 c. Receive and File Report Regarding Purchase of (20) Motorola Minitor Pagers from Masterson Communications in the Amount of $6,021.23 d. Approval of Revised Job Descriptions and Salary Range Adjustments for Maintenance Custodian and Airport Assistant Position e. Adoption of Resolution Declaring Obsolete Items as Surplus AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is an item of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 8. PUBLIC HEARING - 7:00 p.m. a. Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Contained in Article 12, Chapter 2 of the Ukiah Zoning Code b. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision to Deny Appeal of City Engineer Condition of Improvements for a Minor Subdivision No. 95-38 as Filed by James Lohr, to Provide Off Site Street Improvements, for Property Located in R-1 Zone, at 400 Cypress Avenue c. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision to Deny Use Permit Amendment Application No. 95-48, as Filed by Plowshares, to Modify the Special Conditions for Use Permit 92-20 to Permit the Operation of the Dining Room on Specific Weekend Days During the Year, for Property Zoned R-1 Single Family Residential at 150 Luce Avenue As this is a quasi-judicial hearing, Councilmembers are required to view the site prior to Council meeting 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Consideration to Purchase New CAT 627F Self Loading, Auger Scraper for Earthwork Operation at Municipal Landfill Site, Authorize Personnel Modification and Funding Transfer i. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Purchase of CAT 627F Scraper b. Adoption of Resolution Approving Ukiah Valley General Plan 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. 12. 13. a. Presentation of Preliminary DraFt "Nondisposal Facility Element" Prepared by Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority on Behalf of the City of Ukiah b. Adoption of Resolution Electing CALPERS Health Plans for the Management Unit c. Approval of Loan to Ford Street Project for Purchases of Grant Funded Computers and Authorization of Budget Amendment d. Discussion Regarding Compensation of City Manager Position e. Adoption of Resolution Approving MOU for Department Head Unit CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS CLOSED SESSION a. As per Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiator, David Rapport, City Attorney, Regarding City of Ukiah Management Unit b. As per Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiator, Mike Harris, Assistant to the City Manager, Regarding City Manager Position 14. ADJOLmaNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 December 6, 1995 6:30 p.m. Resume Presented Apprd/NoCorr.4. 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance 3. Proclamation Congratulating the Ukiah Junior Pop Warner Football Team for Winning a Playoff Berth in the Pop Warner National Championship Games in Orlando, Florida Approval/Correction of Minutes of Regular Meeting of November 15, 1995 . RIGHT TQ APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. Approved a. Approve Cancellation of Regular Council Meeting of January 3, 1996 Due to Holidays Awarded b. Award of Bid for 4" Portable Sewer Pump to Thomas and Associates in the Amount of $14,988.19 Received c. Receive and File Report Regarding Purchase of (20) Motorola Minitor Pagers from Masterson Communications in the Amount of $6,021.23 Approved d. Approval of Revised Job Descriptions and Salary Range Adjustments for Maintenance Custodian and Airport Assistant Position Adopted Res. 96-28 e. Adoption of Resolution Declaring Obsolete Items as Surplus . AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is an item of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. Introduced . Approved Appeal Approved Appeal . Adptd. Res. 96-29 Adptd. Res. 96-30 Reviewed Adptd.Res. 96-31 Approved Approved Adptd. Res. 96-32 PUBLIC HEAR~G - 7:00 p.m. ' a. Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Contained in Article 12, Chapter 2 of the Ukiah Zoning Code b. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision to Deny Appeal of City Engineer Condition of Improvements for a Minor Subdivision No. 95-38 as Filed by James Lohr, to Provide Off Site Street Improvements, for Property Located in R-1 Zone, at 400 Cypress Avenue c. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision to Deny Use Permit Amendment Application No. 95-48, as Filed by Plowshares, to Modify the Special Conditions for Use Permit 92-20 to Permit the Operation of the Dining Room on Specific Weekend Days During the Year, for Property Zoned R-1 Single Family Residential at 150 Luce Avenue As this is a quasi-judicial hearing, Councilmembers are required to view the site prior to Council meeting UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Consideration to Purchase New CAT 627F Self Loading, Auger Scraper for Earthwork Operation at Municipal Landfill Site, Authorize Personnel Modification and Funding Transfer i. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Purchase of CAT 627F Scraper b. Adoption of Resolution Approving Ukiah Valley General Plan 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. 12. 13. a. Presentation of Preliminary Draft "Nondisposal Facility Element" Prepared by Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority on Behalf of the City of Ukiah b. Adoption of Resolution Electing CALPERS Health Plans for the Management Unit c. Approval of Loan to Ford Street Project for Purchases of Grant Funded Computers and Authorization of Budget Amendment d. Discussion Regarding Compensation of City Manager Position e. Adoption of Resolution Approving MOU for Department Head Unit CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS CLOSED SESSION a. As per Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiator, David Rapport, City Attorney, Regarding City of Ukiah Management Unit b. As per Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiator, Mike Harris, Assistant to the City Manager, Regarding City Manager Position 14. ADJOURNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting Amended Resume CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 December 6, 1995 6:30 p.m. Presented Apprd/NoCorr.4. 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance 3. Proclamation Congratulating the Ukiah Junior Pop Warner Football Team for Winning a Playoff Berth in the Pop Warner National Championship Games in Orlando, Florida Approval/Correction of Minutes of Regular Meeting of November 15, 1995 . RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. Approved a. Approve Cancellation of Regular Council Meeting of January 3, 1996 Due to Holidays Awarded b. Award of Bid for 4" Portable Sewer Pump to Thomas and Associates in the Amount of $14,988.19 Received c. Receive and File Report Regarding Purchase of (20) Motorola Minitor Pagers from Masterson Communications in the Amount of $6,021.23 Approved d. Approval of Revised Job Descriptions and Salary Range Adjustments for Maintenance Custodian and Airport Assistant Position Adopted Res. 96-28 e. Adoption of Resolution Declaring Obsolete Items as Surplus . AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is an item of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 8. PUBLIC HE~G- 7:00 p.m. Approved Neg. Dec a. Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Introduced Contained in Article 12, Chapter 2 of the Ukiah Zoning Code Approved Appeal b. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision to Deny Appeal of City Engineer Condition of w/modifications Improvements for a Minor Subdivision No. 95-38 as Filed by James Lohr, to Provide Off Site Street Improvements, for Property Located in R-1 Zone, at 400 Cypress Avenue Approved Appeal c. Appeal of Planning Commission's Decision to Deny Use Permit Amendment Application No. 95-48, as Filed by Plowshares, to Modify the Special Conditions for Use Permit 92-20 to Permit the Operation of the Dining Room on Specific Weekend Days During the Year, for Property Zoned R-1 Single Family Residential at 150 Luce Avenue As this is a quasi-judicial hearing, Councilmembers are required to view the site prior to Council meeting 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Approved Purchase a. Consideration to Purchase New CAT 627F Self Loading, Auger Scraper for Earthwork Operation at Municipal Landfill Site, Authorize Personnel Modification and Funding Transfer Adptd. Res. 96-29 i. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Purchase of CAT 627F Scraper Adptd. Res. 96-30 b. Adoption of Resolution Approving Ukiah Valley General Plan 10. NEW BUSINESS Reviewed Adptd. Res. 96-31 Approved Approved Adptd. Res. 96-32 a. Presentation of Preliminary Draft "Nondisposal Facility Element" Prepared by Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority on Behalf of the City of Ukiah b. Adoption of Resolution Electing CALPERS Health Plans for the Management Unit c. Approval of Loan to Ford Street Project for Purchases of Grant Funded Computers and Authorization of Budget Amendment d. Discussion Regarding Compensation of City Manager Position e. Adoption of Resolution Approving MOU for Department Head Unit 11. 12. 13. CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT I-lEAD REPORTS CLOSED SESSION 10:55 p.m. a. As per Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiator, David Rapport, City Attorney, Regarding City of Ukiah Management Unit b. As per Government Code Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiator, Mike Harris, Assistant to the City Manager, Regarding City Manager Position 14. ADJOURNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. Susan Brandt-Hawley Rose M. Zola B andt-Hawley & Zola An Association of Attorneys Chauvet House Post Office Box 1659 Glen Ellen, California 95442 (707) 938-3908 · 576-0198 Fax (707) 576-0175 econet: bhz@igc.apc.org Legal Assistant Sara Hews December 6, 1995 By Fax and mail 463-6204 Mayor Fred Schneiter and Councilmembers Ukiah City Council 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA Re: Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Dear Mayor Schneiter and Councilmembers: Citizens for Adequate Review (CFAR) have retained this firm regarding their concern about the significant proposed changes to the air quality sections of the Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program (Plan) to be considered at tonight's City Council meeting. The proposed deletions drastically change the substance of the air quality analysis and mitigations, and should not even be considered without further CEQA analysis and public review. The previously certified EIR concludes that the increase in area population envisioned by the Plan will indirectly result in significant air quality impacts. Mendocino County currently is a non-attainment area for PM-10 (although this information is among the proposed deletions) .and has high levels of other air quality pollutants as well. The Plan therefore appropriately provides for mitigation of cumulative air qualitY impacts. The currently proposed amendments to major portions of the Plan delete not only helpful factual and background information but also important mitigation measures (Implementation Measures OC-33.1(a); 34.1 (a, b, and c); 37.3(a), and 38.1(c)) crafted to protect and improve air quality. Removal of mitigation measures recommended within the EIR process triggers new environmental analysis and recirculation for public comment. Since CEQA Guideline § 15091 requires that all feasible mitigation measures be adopted, removal of these implementation measures will violate CEQA unless there is substantial evidence of infeasibility. It is difficult to understand why mitigations such as development of basin wide air quality significance criteria, consultation with the MCAQMD, development of a program to reduce PM-10 emissions Ukiah City Council Re: Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program December 6, 1995 Page 2 from area roads, or measures to reduce wood stove emissions have now become infeasible. CFAR respectfully requests the City Council's rejection of the proposed deletions to the air quality sections of the Plan, so that mitigation measures are retained for the long-term benefit of the community. If the deletions are to be considered, environmental review and public comment should first occur. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Susan Brandt-Hawley cc: CFAR CFAR\Council. it RECEIVED DEC - 1995 CITY OF UKIAH PUNNING DEPT. Ukiah Mayor, City Council and Planning Staff Ukiah City Hall 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 Re: Christmas Meal at Plowshares , . Dear City Leaders, We believe that the decision to deny the Plowshares December 23rd Christmas meal by the City Plmming Cozmnission was a serious mistake, hi the spirit of the Season, we will not attack either the logic or the character of those members who made the Plowshares decision. We do, however, wish to add our name to the list of Ukiah Families who have serious concerns about this decision, and urge the City Com~cil to 'once again' over-rule the planning cmnmission. We support the City Plamfing Staff in the hmnane way they recmmnended handling the Plowshares request, and believe they should be commended for their professionalism. Thank you for your consideration of this request. We cannot stress enough how strongly we feel about this situation. Respectfully Yours, Tom Montesonti and Cyndi Montesonti 545 Mendocino Drive, Ukiah, CA 95482 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 1995 TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Missing Pages from Agenda Summary for Plowshares Appeal The Planning Department was contacted by Mayor Schneiter this morning to inform us that the Minutes from the November 8, 1995, Planning Commission meeting that were attached to the Agenda Summary for the Plowshares Appeal were not complete. Staff checked the master copy for the packet that was sent to all council members last Friday and found that it was missing Pages 7 and 8 of the Minutes. Copies of these pages have been enclosed for your review and inclusion in your packet. Please accept our apologies for this oversight. If staff can be of further assistance, please contact Associate Planner Dave Lohse at 463-6207. Ms. Sieber stated she feels that every year they are back fighting for the same thing, and she feared the issue will escalate so that the 3 days will extend to the entire year. Alan Sieber, 180 Lute Avenue, brought forth for the Commissioners' perusal a police report listing the calls and years of occurrence for that area. He pointed out that this year 11 of the 15 calls were directly for Plowshares. It appears that as the number of people that Plowshares serves increases, the more trouble the neighborhood has. Chairman Ashiku commented it was the newly adopted policy of the Planning Commission to photocopy items for the audience upon request. No one came forward with a request for the police report. Ms. Emery contradicted Ms. Brodsky's comments, stating there were people unloading laundry and dogs running around her yard all day long. To say no one is there after 1:00 p.m. is untrue. Mr. Sieber submitted photographs of the area taken the previous Monday at 12:15 p.m. There are no cars showing on the weekend, but there are parked cars which interfere with access to his driveway during the week. The previous Minutes show the curb was supposed to be redlined for "No Parking", but nothing has been done. · , Marvin Boesel, 185 Mae Street, stated he does not live in the area, but that he does donate to senior citizens and Plowshares through his employment. He is not in favor of increasing the number of hours Plowshares operates, as it does decrease the property values. He commented that a property owner in the area had a difficult time selling his house, and was forced to drop the value. The amount of traffic is also a problem. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:28 p.m. Commissioner Pruden stated she is a strong supporter of Plowshares both financially and in-kind. She also sat through the entire hearing process in 1993 dealing with the use permit. She took the oppommity to eat lunch there earlier in the day, and noted that across the street there were a number of dogs tied up which the clients were feeding. While she acknowledged the operation is well run, she sees no need to amend the use permit at this point. She further stated she is grateful she does not have this facility next door to her. While she approves of Plowshares, she also realizes it is a great burden to the neighborhood. The previous Planning Commission came to the proper conclusion. Commissioner Larson stated this is a difficult decision for him, since he believes Plowshares is a valuable asset to the community and is doing the best they can under the circumstances. He is sitting on the Planning Commission because he went to bat for his neighborhood and its impacts. He feels strongly about the quality of life in the City's residential areas, and is of the opinion that certain projects threaten that quality of life. While he thinks Plowshares is a wonderful thing, he believes it MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 November 8, 1995 to be in the wrong location. Because of what Plowshares does, they compromised good planning principles to bring the service to the community. He cannot support the project. Chairman Ashiku stated he was disappointed this amendment would not be passed. Three additional days in an entire year is a small price to pay; it is inconsequential compared to the benefit of the services. ON A MOTION by Commissioner Pmden, seconded by Commissioner Larson, it was carried by the following roll call vote, to deny Use Permit Amendment Application No. 95-48, as filed by Plowshares, to allow the modification of Special Condition No. 7 for Use Permit No. 92-20 to permit the operation of the dining room at the Plowshares facility on specific weekend days during the year. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Larson and Pruden Chairman Ashiku None Commissioners Baker and Smith Chairman Ashiku notified the applicant of the denial of the request, and advised they have until November 18, 1995 to f'fle an appeal. 6B. Use Permit Application No. 95-44, as filed by Jamie Williams, dba the Car Company, to allow a used car lot on a portion of a parcel located in the C-2 (,Highway Commercial and Restricted Industrial) Zonine District,. on property located at 1280 and 1290 South State Street (.Assessor P~rcel No. 003-540-30) Associate Planner David Lohse advised approval of this project would allow the establishment of a used car lot on the project site, which is located in the C-2 District. , , This car lot would be located on the southwest portion of an existing commercial site. The design of this project includes: A 3,500 sq. ft. area that will be defined by a 15-foot setback area on the south and east sides and striped parking spaces on the west; Landscaped planter areas along the southern corners of the site; and A srnall office area attached to the nearby commercial structure to the northwest. The use of this area would also require that one of the existing 40-foot wide driveways along State Street be closed. Planning staff analyzed the project design and found that it complies with applicable use and development standards for the C-2 District. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8 November 8, 1995 daphne macneil Ukiah City Council Ukiah City Hall 300 Seminary Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 December 4, 1995 Dear I know you will voting soon on parts of the Ukiah General Plan. I urge you to take a strong stand to protect our air quality. Please be sure that this invaluable resource is given careful consideration and attention in the General Plan and that it is in no way compromised. Thank you, Daphne Macneil 817 north oak street ukish, cs 95482 12-05-1995 ll:29AM 12IB5/1995 ~U:b~ P. 02 DEC-06-199~ ii:~G BRANDT-HAWLEYSZOIA B£a dt-Hawlcy & Zola .~l~ Assoda~ioa of A~orne~s (707) 938.390S · 576.0i98 Fax (707) 576-0175 econet: hhz@ig¢.ap¢.org P.O1 Legml Assistaat Sara Hew~ December 6, 1995 By Fax and mail 463-6204 Mayor Fred Schneiter and Councilmembers Ukiah City Council 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA Re: ukiah valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Dear Mayor Schneiter and Councilmembers: citizens for Adequate Review (CFAR) have retained this firm regarding their concern abdut the significant proposed changes to the air quality sections of the Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program (Plan) to be considered at tonight's City Council meeting. The proposed deletions drastically change the substance of the air quality analysis and mitigations, and should not even be considered without further CEQA analysis and public review. The previously certified EIR concludes that the increase in area population envisioned by the Plan will indirectly result in significant air quality impacts. Mendocino County currently is a non-attainment area for PM-10 (although this information is among the proposed deletions) and has high levels of other air quality pollutants as well. The Plan therefore appropriately provides for mitigation of cumulative air quality impacts. The currently proposed amendments to major portions of the Plan delete not only helpful factual and background information but also important mitigation measures (Implementation Measures OC-33.1(a); 34.1 (a, b, and c); 37.3(a), and 38.1(c)) crafted to protect and improve airlquality. Removal of mitigation measures recommended within the EIR process triggers new environmental analysis and recirculation for public comment. Since CEQA Guideline § 15091 requires that all feasible mitigation measures be adopted, removal of these implementation measures will violate CEQA unless there is substantial evidence of infeasibility. It is difficult to understand why mitigations such as development of basin wide air quality significance criteria, consultation with the MCAQMD, development of a program to reduce PM-lC emissions _OCa t. i 0i:, LUUL ~V DATE' TIME' i..,:)c a t ioi: · '.) (: LUCE !0(? LUi::E 0(.~ LUCE (:'(? Li ire ."._:) 0 (:, '::;: L!j{]:E (-.:, (:, LUCE ,".2;2 LUCE :):) L Ut'X:] i;.)¢ LL!Fj~:Z (i:.;i? i ,Ii"~- (i (.: ~-.:','.3 (%) !.UCE 0 (!:.' ee LUCE ¢¢ LUCE ":'"' UCE ~...,... L i;:J¢ L Ui.-.:E '~.' '-.- .-, L~ , .".:_'":3 O,:i:, LUF;F 4:~ t L!CE 4':.::'. i ijr:L 40 LUrjE · -'V:" ' ~'r.r - ',,: ...... 4¢..} 4.") LUi":E ~ ":..': LUC~ ~ fii:) LU[:i::. I F_i~ LU[:E AV ~v qV ~V AV . ~V &v AY ~V ~¥ AV AY ~¥ ~V · ~¥ . . 4V ~V .. Date /28/':,'5 / '~ -" ¢ .- :...~! / .; '"i -(::/05 05/i 6/% (::,5 / ~ ': t:,'~4 / L ," ," 7 .J (:..' ? 19~ ...',,,., ,~%,! . - /i 6/95 t:, .-" :).q ,' c., 4 ?,... , .... .98 :%/94 ,::) ';'/' i ?/'?4 i:!? /L';O ~,'i! ',.: ,.~..,- 06/i 4/'?4 (:'6/~ ''~ ' ':" '* ()5/2i/94 P, 5 / ~ 94 -'.: ._.: :5/ '"'~ i .... it/24/95 i,.''~, -: i ,/! 7./95 ! ~ ,.:._,? i Class 74()H ASSIST OTHER ii~A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE .~ ~ '-, A :.~:H BATTERY-CITiZEN/tfANDS i i5A CON!'ROLLE~J, SUBSIANCE- .,' j~ ~., .,.,. , L,...'.Ut~. ~^ SUSP PERSONS ~ J~M . , . ilia DUI/DRUNK DRIViN!:-ALC i~SA ABANDONED AUTO 10SA ABANDONED AUTO ii4A CONTROLLE~ SUBSi:~NCE 4i5G PROWLER 4! 5N [:,iLiTURBANCE/OTHER 4! % PROWLER 75(~C SLISF':.CiRC, 750C :?L".':?P~ CIRC.. 75(;i::: 2L!SF', CIF,'.C~ UKP UKF' dKF' UKP UKP UKP UKP U~,'. P UKP Case 95¢0¢¢J2975 Loca t ic,:,~ ' ~ r'FxA~ ~'q>': HtSTOR? T'?T Loc at ior.., Lube_ '~ 50 i. UCE ~ % LUCE ! 5':) LUCE i SO LUCE i 50 . UCE i $(:'. I.. i '.:_, 0 i! 50 i.. i S() LUL':E i 5,:'-:* LiiL':[i i 5() LUCE ~i 5,:) LUCE i 55 LUCE i 55 'i 2A i i'r'E ,, ';.1t?, i ~, ._, LUC[ i 95 LU[:E .Ii 20(., L.!.iCE 2i-?;,L dCE 5' f:',. (:', ; 2 (:' ~:-' LuCE 2<:)-??), · 2 (x:] LUCE pl..,(:) ~. , _.. LL.'.~ ,.r. · T.,('K:) , :iF'F. AV AV AV AY AV AY AV Ay AV AV AV AV AY AV ~V AY ,. AV AV AV AY ~V AV AY AY AV AY ~.V AY :fPa t.s- []lass t i/i 4/95 7%~] SUSF'.: ~'-~'"'uinu, i¢~/':'S/eR 4i~'* 5RUNK l~4 F'UBLi[ ¢,?'/05/95 74~)H ASSZST OTHER AGENCY ()8/22/?'5 75()C SUSP, CikC, 07/27/?5 4i~.I TRESPASSING (>6/23/% ~5t~ D~STURBANCE/O!'HEF~ ~.~.,':'~' "~'~, ..... ~, 74(~H Aeel~"~,~ ~, ~ OI'HE~: AGEi~CY 04/25/'¢5 75(:'C SUSF'~ ~2..'(:,'~194'~'4,?,H ¢~SSIST Oi'HER AGENCY ~i.'2~;'°* 4~5N ~'~iT iRBANF:F/fiTHER ..'no,o4 597F [.ON!ROL ViOLATiON/ANI f?/76/94 4~'9~ 'fHEFT VEHZOLE/&O'rO ...... '"' ,, , u,'.BH,~L.~, (:'7./~¢a:/74 5e?F CONi'ROI ViLOLATION/ANi ,%/97/94 *' IC ...... ,~SD DOMEST 8UARREL %/(::,6/94 46~i:,Z BURGLARY '-60~. UNK. O, ,o=: ,'o..~ 75~)A SijSF' F'FRXfiN~ ~ ..... ~ ,o= :F'or' ~h:M-L, ~KNOW,'~ CAUSE ,:,.~/oo/c,S 5~26 ALARM-UNKNOWN i~..' i . . 08/i f: '7 .' 5 ! / ? 5 O8i(i8/94 'i '-" i--)-i ,; ? ~...,! i · 08/I i/'.94 ~:', '~ /") ~' / C, A w...:..' -; .-,'; (.', ~ ,"~ 5/94 ,:)~/i 4/?4 5(.'..2C ALARN-uNKNOWN {-_'.A;JSE 4::]',5~: THEFT ?:ICYCLE 597C SICK O? I~JURE}) ANITA 49% !HEFT YEHiCLE / ~LL Sc..'4B VAND, F'RiVATE PROPER f 528[) W-PERSONAL WEAFON/(H "75(~A SU;':.;F' F'ERSON.S. 7586 SUSF'~ CIRC~ 597A BARKING DOG ~g7 Case UKF' UKF' UKP ~t.-' , ,.,...' 1'.". F UKP Ui<P iJ!(F' UKP ~ I'-,"F' UKF' t.!KP !jKF' UK F' UKP dK F' ltKF' UKF' UKF' Uk'. F' UKP IJKP Ut<P {J~: F' iii<,' F' U,K P JKP U,kP MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL DRAFT OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - November 15, 1995 The City Council convened in a regular meeting, of which the agenda was legally noticed and posted, at 6:36 p.m. Roll was taken and the following Councilmembers were present: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. Absent at roll: Councilmember Shoemaker. Staff present: City Clerk McKay, City Manager Horsley, City Attorney Rapport, Finance Director Elton, Public Works Administrator Goodrick, Planning Director Sawyer, Assistant to the City Manager Harris, Public Utility Director Barnes, Fire Marshal Sprehn, and Assistant Redevelopment Director DeKnoblough. 2. INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Schneiter delivered the Invocation and Councilmember Mastin led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. APPROVAL/CORRECTION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1, 1995 M/S Malone/Wattenburger to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 1, 1995, as submitted. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Maygr Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Shoemaker. 4. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Mayor Schneiter reviewed Government Code Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedures. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S Mastin/Malone to approve the Consent Calendar as follows; 5a. Received and approved the Report of October 1995 Disbursements. 5b. Denied claims for damages received from Helen Miller; Lori Ann Cashada, and referred them to the City Insurance Carrier, REMIF. 5c. Adopted Ordinance No. 960 adopting 1994 Uniform Fire Code, amending Division 6, Chapter 3, Articles 1 and 2, and Chapter 6 of the Ukiah Municipal Code, entitled, respectively, Fire Prevention Code and Outdoor Burning, and Amending Chapter 4, entitled, Fires. 5d. Awarded the bid for a steel bolted water tank to Peabody TecTank Company in an amount not to exceed $21,815, and authorized expenditure from the Water Department's operating budget from account 820-3850-690. 5e. Authorized continued advertising in the Ukiah Daily Journal for the one vacancy on Airport Commission. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. Absent: Councilmember Shoemaker. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No one came forward. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Sa. Reallocation of Interest Income And Distribution of PERS Surplus The City Attorney advised this item of business should be addressed after Closed Session. Reg. Mtg. November 15, 1995 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - November 15, 1995 Bb. Identify Council Desired Discussion Topics For Joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting of November 29, 1995 The Planning Director reported on Planning Commission discussions and individual requested matters for discussion at this upcoming joint session. Mayor Schneiter noted as the Planning Commission has requested this meeting and reminded Council of the two hour timeframe, additional items from Council may need to be limited. Councilmember Malone requested that questioning of applicants regarding matters not related to land use issues be agendized. Mayor Schneiter requested the issue of residences in business parks and discussion how the Planning Commission views residential use and availability issues, be agendized. Councilmember Shoemaker joined the meeting at this time of 6:45 p.m. Councilmember Shoemaker requ~.sted stricter requirements for attendance for Planning Commissioners and discussion of off-site improvements. NEW BUSINESS 9a. Authorize Transfer of Funds, $9,510.52, from NCPA General Operating Account for Hydroelectric Plant Work The Public Utility Director reported on September 20, 1995 Council authorized the amount of $10,665 for the balance of funds to complete maintenance work at the Hydro Plant and for the development of a maintenance schedule and maintenance check list for the plant. He explained this transfer amount of $9,510.52 is the final payment and completion of the work relative to maintenance on the generating and electrical systems. He explained the work will be completed this week. M/S Malone/Wattenburger to authorize the Public Utilities Director to transfer $9,510.52 from the City of Ukiah's General Operating Reserve Funds at NCPA for payment of work performed by the Northern California Power Agency at the Lake Mendocino Hydro Project. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. 9b. Approval of Amendment to Contract with Municipal Resource Consultants for Revenue Enhancement Services For Business License Information and Transfer Tax, Franchise Fees and Property Tax The Assistant to the City Manager reported on the proposal received from Municipal Resource Consultants to provide the City with business license, property and documentary transfer tax and franchise fee audits. He explained this would be no cost to the City, due to a percentage fee paid, based on new revenue developed. He noted this matter has been a concern of City staff, as the property tax issue is significant and also affects Redevelopment issues. He explained that MRC will assist the City in completing the necessary SB90 State mandate reimbursement forms for reimbursement from the State for costs associated with business tax information. Council queried staff regarding State reimbursement, possibility of having City staff conduct this work instead of a consultant, and recovery of City costs. The Finance Director explained we will be developing a system which we can use in the future which will be integrated. He explained why using expertise in this field is more efficient. He noted there are Reg. Mtg. November 15, 1995 Page 2 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - November 15, 1995 other resources which can be accessed with information sources via computers, and outlined the limitations of in-house hardware and software to access all information sources. Councilmember Wattenburger stated as these costs are reimbursable and our City staff will be trained to take this program over, he sees this as a good situation for us to increase unknown revenues. M/S Wattenburger/Mastin to authorize the Mayor to execute amendment to Consultant Services Agreement with Municipal Resource Consultants (MRC) for revenue enhancement and audit services. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmember Malone. PUBLIC HEARING 7a. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution Adjusting Fees and Charges for Refuse and Recycling Collection in the city of Ukiah I. Approval of Revision to Garbage and Recycling Collection Service Agreement Ii. Authorization of Budget Amendment The City Engineer/Public W~rks Director reported on the recommendation for a 8.21% rate increase for garbage and recycling service. He explained this recommendation provides for 2.60% contracted automatic annual rate increase equal to a net 75% of the CPI increase, for the period March 1994 to March 1995, after deduction for billing and franchise fees; a 1.60% recovery of funds lost in prior year because of franchise and billing fee deduction on gross revenue due to CPI adjustment; a 2.61% CPI adjustment compensation for period July - December 1995, (contractually due July 1); a 1.40% yardwaste processing fee. This proposed increase reflects a portion of the funds necessary for processing for processing yardwaste collected from the curbside program. He reported that the remainder of funds necessary to offset the processing costs of yardwaste collected from the curbside program ($9,700) is proposed to be taken from the revenue generated by the increase in franchise fees to be collected as a result of the recommended increases of 2.60%, 1.60%, and 2.61%). He noted this would be accomplished by transferring $9,700 from the general fund to the Solid Waste Disposal Site Fund. He conducted a slide presentation detailing a comparison of other rate structures, information regarding Solid Wastes Systems Financial Statements, comparison of recycling prices of Solid Waste Systems and Willits Recycling, and various garbage rate calculations with various options. Council queried staff regarding yardwaste curbside pickup costs, hauler pick up of large items, consumer price index adjustment period timeframes, franchise fees, and computation process for recommended CPI figures past and present. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED - 7:37 P.M. Bob Reid, 1141 West Standley St., stated he moved to his current residence in 1986 with one 30 gallon can service which he is charged $20.35 per month, and he read this hearing notice where $10.80 is the rate proposed for a 30 gallon can. He outlined problems he has incurred trying to remedy this overcharging, with no satisfaction from the garbage hauler or City. He requested a reimbursement. He reminded Council that many years ago the franchising of garbage collection was sold to residents with the promise of a free Spring and Fall cleanup, which is no longer, yet the City still collects a franchise fee from the hauler and raises rates. Terry Melvin, 365 Washo Drive, reported he has a concern with a yardwaste irony where he cut down a tree and put it in pickup to take to dump free as curbside pickup was free. He found the dump charges $3.75 per cubic yard due to discourage traffic on road due Reg. Mtg. November 15, 1995 Page 3 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - November 15, 1995 to Vichy Resort and homes, and feels this is not a real issue as he pays taxes to drive roads. He also noted his neighbor's large amount of yardwaste was not picked up by hauler. He urged Council to not discourage yardwaste as landscaping is an asset to the community and yardwaste is a natural by-product. Mike Sweeney, Barbara Street, stated that yardwaste processing was done at landfill previously and now must be hauled away at higher cost due to neighbors complaints, but still could be done at landfill. He encouraged Council to take this time, at the 3 year window for review of the garbage contract and all other factors such as recycling income and enhancement of recycling efforts. He suggested continuing this rate hearing or make it provisional to look into base level of rates, recycling, and recyclable materials sales related companies. He distributed a copy of a Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority Report on Diversion of Solid Waste from Disposal to Council. Jim Salyers, Owner of Solid Waste Systems, commented recycling markets fluctuate which makes it very difficult to forecast and noted he is present to answer questions. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 8:04 p~M. Council queried staff regarding the proposed 1.6% processing fee, part of the last increase was for a new recycling truck which was not received, questioned flow of recyclables through subsidiary companies. Mr. Warren, CPA for Solid Waste Systems, explained his summary of shipments to recycling Reward company, explained deliver and preparation costs of materials at 205 per ton, and explained other costs involved. Discussion ensued regarding recycling programs potential, current recyclable prices are low due to overabundance of materials with not enough demand. Mr. Salyers stated they are always willing to negotiate with the City to discuss services and additional contracts. The City Attorney advised Council as to the contractual wording allowing rate hearings and review CPI every 3 years to prevent intensive investigations from fair rate of returns. Recess - 8:39 p.m. Reconvened - 8:46 p.m. The City Attorney advised the contract should be amended in future Council action, to reflect gate fee increases do not reflect loss of revenue to contractor. Councilmember Mastin questioned the issue of free curbside and charge at dump, in addition to free fall and spring cleanup, whether we could we do a free greenwaste cleanup twice a year. Staff reviewed the problems associated with these past programs. Councilmember Shoemaker suggested Council review the recommendations just received from MSWMA and discuss them at a future meeting. Discussion ensued regarding contract increases versus fees or rate increases and a negotiated contract change possibility. Motion by Mayor Schneiter to adopt the revised schedule of fees and rates for garbage and recycling collection service; authorize the city Manager and City Attorney to revise the contract with Solid Wastes Systems to clarify that the hauler shall receive a net 75% of CPI adjustment; increase General Fund Franchise Fee revenue budget by $9,700, and authorize transfer of $9,700 revenue Reg. Mtg. November 15, 1995 Page 4 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - November 15, 1995 generated by the increase in franchise fees collected) from the General Fund to Solid Waste Disposal Site Fund to offset a portion of the processing costs for yardwaste collected from the curbside program. The motion failed for lack of second. M/S Wattenburger/Shoemaker to adopt Resolution No. 96-26 approving the revised schedule of fees and rates, (to not include the proposed 1.6% recovery of funds lost in prior years) for garbage and recycling collection service; authorized the City Manager and City Attorney to revise the contract with Solid Wastes Systems to clarify that the hauler shall receive a net 75% of CPI adjustment; increase General Fund Franchise Fee revenue budget by $9,700, and authorized transfer of $9,700 (revenue generated by the increase in franchise fees collected) from the General Fund to Solid Waste Disposal Site Fund to offset a portion of the processing costs for yardwaste collected from the curbside program. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. 9c. Approval of 1996-97 Budge~'Schedule and Setting of Date For Council/staff Goal Setting Strategic Planning Session The City Manager distributed a revised handout outlining the upcoming budget schedule. Councilmember Wattenburger requested City staff and Council stay with these proposed final hearing dates of June 24-26, 1996, due to his vacation scheduling constraints. Council received the schedule. 9d. Approval of Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Uklah and Ukiah Redevelopment Agency for Grant Administration of Economic Development Block Grant No. 94-EDBG-333 The Assistant Redevelopment Director reported the MOU was distributed to Council yesterday. He explained in May 1995 the City of Ukiah was awarded a CDBG grant in the amount of $151,519 to establish a small business development revolving loan program. He reported this MOU is between the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Redevelopment Agency to allow the Agency to provide grant administration. M/S Wattenburger/Mastin to approve Memorandum of Understanding with Ukiah Redevelopment Agency to provide Grant administration of Economic Development Block Grant No. 94-EDBG-333 and authorized the City Manager to execute MOU. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYE: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. 9e. Discussion of Formation of Joint Powers Agreement For Mendoclno County Inland Water and Power Commission Mayor Schneiter reported on the meetings he has attended surrounding the Eel River and Russian River water issue. He explained the development process in creating the drafts for a joint powers agreement for Mendocino County Inland Water and Power Commission. He noted he feels Council should discuss this proposal and decide if and how they to participate, as it could be costly in the future. The City Attorney disclosed his potential conflict of interest as he represents the Redwood Valley Water district, and noted this district board has not addressed this JPA matter yet. He reported this proposed agreement does not provide for the City of Ukiah to sit on this JPA governing board, and outlined the advantages to have the City on this board. He clarified potential upcoming issues Reg. Mtg. November 15, 1995 Page 5 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - November 15, 1995 surrounding this water diversion. Councilmember Wattenburger stated he feels we should be involved in this. Councilmember Mastin commented we should be an active member in this and not pass up the current opportunity. Councilmember Shoemaker indicated he feels we should be involved for awhile to see how this develops. Mayor Schneiter indicated he feels City representation should be involved. Councilmember Malone also answered in the affirmative. After Council discussion it was determined that the City representative is to be Mayor Schneiter as he is the most qualified in water and power generation details, and should advocate for a City voting representative. 9f. Approval of Appraisal RepQrt For Right of Way Acquisition at 825 North State Street - Shoemaker Parcel The City Attorney reported Council should address this item of business after Closed Session. 9g. Adoption of Resolution Approving Management Unit Memorandum of Understanding The City Attorney reported Council should address this item of business after Closed Session. 10. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Mastin - Reported on the forum at Mendocino College with Mayor and the City Manager regarding City issues and the role of government; noted he will not be able to attend the December 6th Council meeting. Councilmember Malone - Reported he attended County Supervisor Peterson's sponsored county workshop for the general plan opening; and noted he will be speaking to Leadership Mendocino regarding planning this Friday. Councilmember Wattenburger - None. Councilmember Shoemaker - Reported on request for support for Carolyn Ratto of California for Vice President of National League of Cities; reported on League of California cities reduction of President's appointments effects; and provided Council with a MSWMA update. Mayor Schneiter - Reported on a Mayors/Managers meeting he and the City Manager attended in Ft. Bragg with Ukiah Public Safety Director Keplinger; reported he met in a headwaters benefit meeting with PG&E; noted he will be going to San Francisco for a NCPA finance Committee meeting; and reported he will be attending the meeting tomorrow night RRFC district. 11. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS None. CLOSED SESSION 12a. G.C. Section 54956.8 - Conference with Real Property Negotiator Regarding 825 North State Street Property, for Right of Way Acquisition from R. Shoemaker Parcel Reg. Mtg. November 15, 1995 Page 6 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - November 15, 1995 Councilmember Shoemaker did not enter Closed Session at this time. Into Closed Session - 10:08 p.m. 12b. G.C. Section 54957.6 - Conference with Labor Negotiator, Ukiah City Manager - Management Unit Councilmember Shoemaker entered the meeting at 10:18 p.m. 12c. G.C. Section 54956.9 - Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Anticipated Litigation: One Case Out of Closed Session - 10:55 p.m. Sa. Reallocation of Interest Income and Distribution of PERS Surplus M/S Mastin/Wattenburger to allocate losses by City funds only method and allocate PERS surplus as recommended by City staff. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYE: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. 9f. Approval of Appraisal Report for Right of Way Acquisition at 825 North State Street, Shoemaker Parcel M/S Schneiter/Wattenburger to approve appraisal report and authorized staff to offer appraisal amount. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYE: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: Councilmember Shoemaker. 9g. Adoption of Resolution Approving Management Unit Memorandum of Understanding M/S Wattenburger/Mastin to approve MOU with Management Unit as proposed by City Manager. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYE: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:56 p.m. to November 29, 1995, 6:00 p.m., in Civic Center Council Chambers, 300 Seminary Avenue for Joint Meeting with Planning Commission CCMIN.213 Cathy McKay CMC/AAE, City Clerk Reg. Mtg. November 15, 1995 Page 7 ITEM NO. 6a DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 1996, DUE TO HOLIDAYS In the past, Council has considered and approved the cancellation of the first regular Council meeting in January, due to both the general lack of business and the difficulty of putting together an agenda during the holidays. Staff is requesting that the regular Council meeting of January 3, 1996, be canceled for the reasons stated above. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Cancel the regular Council meeting of January 3, 1996. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Do not cancel the meeting. Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Karen Yoast, Executive Assistant Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: None. Candace Horsley, Cit~y~anager R:I\CM:kk ACOUNCIL.96 ITEM NO. DATE: 6b DECEMBER 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID FOR A 4" PORTABLE SEWER PUMP REPORT Included in the 1995/96 Budget is $15,000 for the replacement of a mid 1940 model pump now in use. Specifications were written and Request for Quotations were sent to pump dealers. Three (3) bids were received on November 14, 1995, (see attached bid tabulation). The low bidder was Thomas and Associates for the sum of $14,988.19. Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Thomas and Associates for the amount of $14,988.19. RECOMMENDED ACTION: $14,988.19. Acct. No.' 612-3580-800 Award the bid to Thomas and Associates for the sum of ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Reject all bids. Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Prepared by: George Borecky, Water/Sewer Operations Superintendent Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Tabulation of Bids APPROVED:~. ~~.~ ~~L~ R:I~;EWER:kk Can'n'n'~ace i&~rsley, City M~nager APUMP ITEM NO. 6c MEETING DATE December 6,1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: RECEIVE REPORT REGARDING PURCHASE OF 20 MOTOROLA PAGERS The Ukiah Fire Department utilizes a paging system to notify off-duty and volunteer personnel of the need to respond to emergencies and for other communications needs. The pagers used in this system require replacement from time to time because repair parts are no longer available, repair and maintenance costs are higher than replacement costs, or the unit is simply consumed. The 20 pagers to be purchased here are for purposes of replacement, and are a budgeted item for the 1995/96 fiscal year. The purchase of these pagers has been deferred in previous budgets, but must be completed at this time to assure effective paging capability for the Fire Department. Old units will be offered at auction or utilized for non-essential communications needs. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file report regarding purchase of 20 Motorola pagers. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Acct. No. (if not budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: 100-2101-800-001 Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Fred W. Keplinger, Director of Public Safety Prepared by: Roe M. Sandelin, Operations Commander Coordinated with: Nora Kennedy, Purchasing Warehouse Supervisor and Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Request for Quotation (2) 2. Excerpt from adopted budget APPROVED: C-an~'~e HorsleY, C~'ty~nager Pursuant to City Code purchasing procedures, budgeted purchases between $5,000 and $10,000 are to be formally reported to the City Council for their receipt and file action. Requests for quotations (RFQ) through the informal bid process were sent to seven suppliers. The bids were opened by the Purchasing Department on November 14, 1995, at 1:00 p.m. Two bids were returned and were evaluated by staff. The apparent Iow bidder is Mastersons Communications, with a total of $6,021.23. The cost is considerably below the budgeted amount of $9,840. A purchase order has been issued. CITY of UKIAH 1320 Airport Road Ukiah CA. 95482 Phone 707-463-6233 Fax 707-462-4281 - REQUEST FOR QUOTATION TO: MASTERSON COMMUNICATIONS 2081 Wellmar Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER QUOTATIONS ARE REQUESTED FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: QU~wrrrY ~ DESCRIPTION 20 Motorola Minitor II Pager, Model: H03UMC1222AN with Charger Model: NLN3045. Pager to include: Battery Installed Frequency Channel 1: 154.010MHz Installed Paging Tone Reeds: Group Call: 617.4/584.8 Individual Call: 553.9/584.8 R97 Dual-Call Installed and Active R521 Delete Second Channel and Jump F2 Eharger to include: Antenna, Call Light and Reset Net 30 Days DEL. T0: _ Ukiah CA DEL. DATE: 2 weeks ARO BmDER: Bruce A. Masterson Master$on Communications TrrLE: President hone. (707) 462-9736 DATE: 11/3/95 _REQ. NO. BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED'UNTIL 1:00 p.m. Nov. 14, 1995 ATTHE OFFICE OFTHE PURCHASING AGENT. CITY of UKIAH BY: Nora Kennedy ALL QUOTATIONS SHALL BE F.O.B. UKIAH, CA. UNIT PRICE TOTAL 280.71 5,614.20 fEI~IVIS: 1. Right Is reserved to reject any and all bids. 2. Right Is reserved to accept separate Items unless specifically denied by bidder. 3. In CASE OF DEFAULT, the City of UkJah may procure the Items quoted on from other sources and hold the original bidder liable for any increased costs. 4. All subs~ltul~ons shaJl show manufacturer's name, catalog number and comparable specs. 5. The pdce, terms, delivery point, and delivery date may indlvlduaJly or collectively be the basis of the awarding of the bid. 8. ALL QUOTATIONS MUST BE SIGNED. OPENING DATE and TIME "MUST" be prominently displayed on subml~ng envelope. 7. In submllzlng ~ above, the vendor agrees l/~at the acceptance of any or all quotations ~by the City of Uklah, within 30 days constRutes a contract. TO: CITY of UKIAH 1320 Airport Road Ukiah CA. 95482 Phone 707-463-6233 Fax 707-462-4281 REQUEST FOR QUOTATION THIS IS NOT AN ORDER WILUAMS COMMUNICATION 795 Farmers Lane, Suite 23 Santa Rosa, CA 95405 DATE: 11/3/95 NO. BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL 1:00 p.m. Nov. 14, 1995 AT THE OFFICE OF THE PURCHASING AGENT. CITY of UKIAH BYe. Nora Kennedy QUOTATION~ · QUANTITY. i 2O ARE REQUESTED FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: DESCRIPTION Motoro~ll Pager, Model: H03UMC1222AN with Charger Pager to fl~ffde: Battery Installed Frequency Channel 1: 154.010MHz Installed Paging Tone Reeds: Group Call: 617.4/584.8 Individual Call: 553.9/584.8 R97 Dual-Call Installed and Active R521 Delete Second Channel and Jump F2 Charger to include: Antenna, Call Light and Reset ALL QUOTATIONS $ItAI.L BE F.O.B. UKIAH, CA. UNIT PRICE I TOTAl. '616 '°°-. -~L U. S ')-A'~ TERMS: DEL. TO: DEL. DATE: BIDDER: TITLE: Phone: DATE/BID: . TERMS: 1. Flight is reserved ~o reject any and all bids. 2. Righ! Is reserved ~o accept sep~'~te Items unless spedflc~l¥ danled by bidder. 3. In CASE OF DEFAULTi the City of Ukiah may procure the Items quoted on from other sources and hold the odglnal bidder liable for any increased costs. 4. All substitutions shall show manufacturers name, catalog number and comparable specs. 5. The pdce, terms, delivery point, and delivery date may Individually or colleclNely be the basis of the awarding of the bid. S. ALL QUOTATIONS MUST BE SIGNED. OPENING DATE and TIME "MUST' be promlnen~ displayed on submitting envelope. 7. In submlrdng the above, the vendor agrees that the acceptance of any or all quotations by the City of Uklah, within 30 days constitutes a contract. 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 00~J 0 0 LO 0 CO LO CO ~-' ~-- LO CO O~J CO O'J O00~OOtO0 ~r o c0 o o oki o c 000 000 000 ~- ~- ~-- ~- ~- oqooqqqq ITEM NO. 6D DATE: December 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REVISED JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND SALARY RANGE ADJUSTMENTS FOR MAINTENANCE CUSTODIAN AND AIRPORT ASSISTANT POSITIONS Maintenance Custodian Attached is a revised job description for the position of Maintenance Custodian for your review and consideration. We feel the revised job description more accurately reflects the duties and responsibilities of the position which have greatly increased over the past few years. The current job description is also attached for comparison purposes. The Maintenance Custodian is currently responsible for the Civic Center, the Grace Hudson Museum, and the Sun House. The current salary range for this position is Range 24 ($1,593 - $1,937 per month). Due to the increased duties and responsibilities, Staff recommends that the salary range be increased to Range 28 ($1,759 - $2,138 per month). This salary range is a 10% increase and is more appropriate for the classification given the increasing expertise required for maintenance duties, such as plumbing, electrical work, installation of furniture and cubicles, and virtually any other maintenance task that is requested by Staff. This position also now encompasses substantial supervisory responsibilities for six to eight months of the year which were not part of the original custodial duties. (Continued on next page) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Revised Job Descriptions and Salary Range Adjustments for the Maintenance Custodian and Airport Assistant positions with funding authorized from Fund Balances of General Fund (#100) and Airport Fund (#600), respectively. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Do Not Approve Revised Job Descriptions and Salary Range Adjustments 2. Refer to Staff for additional information Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Personnel Department Prepared by' Kari Revheim, Acting Personnel Officer Coordinated with- Candace Horsley, City Manager Michael Harris, Assistant to the City Manager Attachments- 1. Proposed Job Description - Maintenance Custodian. 2. Current Job Description - Maintenance Custodian. 3. Proposed Job Description - Airport Assistant. 4. Current Job Description - Airport Attendant. APPROVED: ~'~J' 3: PER\ASR. MAINT SUMMARY (Continued) If approved, the salary would be increased 5% immediately, with an additional 5% increase possible one year thereafter. A 5% salary increase equates to $96.85 per month as the Maintenance Custodian is currently at E Step of Range 24. Associated benefit costs would be $27.51 per month. For the remainder of Fiscal Year 1995-96 or seven months, the additional personnel costs would total approximately $870. We are proposing to fund this increase by utilizing the Fund Balance in the General Fund #100. Staff recommends that the revised job description and salary range adjustment to Range 28 be approved for the Maintenance Custodian classification. Airport Assistant In 1990, Don Bua was promoted from Airport Supervisor to the position of Airport Manager, and assumed administrative duties and responsibilities which had previously been performed by the City Engineer. Due to this shift in responsibilities, the Airport Assistant (formerly titled Airport Attendant) has gradually assumed several of the duties and responsibilities which had been performed by the Airport Supervisor position. Staff has attached a revised job description for the position of Airport Assistant for your review and consideration. We feel the revised job description more accurately reflects the duties and responsibilities of the position which have greatly increased over the past several years. The current job description is also attached for comparison purposes. The current salary range for this position is Range 31 ($1,894 - $2,302 per month). Staff recommends that the salary range be increased to Range 35 ($2,090 - $2,541 per month). This salary range is a 10% increase and is more appropriate for the classification given the increased duties and responsibilities. If approved, the salary would be increased 5% immediately, with an additional 5% increase possible one year thereafter. A 5% salary increase equates to $115.10 per month as the Airport Assistant is currently at E Step of Range 31. Associated benefit costs would be $24.87 per month. For the remainder of Fiscal Year 1995-96 or seven months, the additional personnel costs would total approximately $980. We are proposing to fund this increase by utilizing the Fund Balance in the Airport Fund #600. Staff recommends that the revised job description and salary range adjustment to Range 35 be approved for the Airport Assistant classification. 3: PER\ASR.MAINT 300 SE ~.~VE., UKIAH, CA 95482-5400 · ADMIN. 707/463-6200 · PUBLIC SAFETY 463-6242/6274 · · FAX # 707/463-6204 · JOB DESCRIPTION MAINTENANCE CUSTODIAN DEFINITION Under general supervision to administer and be responsible for the care, upkeep, cleaning, maintenance, and related duties as required of City buildings, related public facilities, and grounds; and to do related work as assigned. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES: (These examples are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work performed. The examples of work performed are neither restricted to nor all-encompassing of the duties to be performed under this job title.) (E=Essential Duty; M=Major Portion of Time) - Maintains floor areas, which includes sweeping, vacuuming, shampooing, mopping, waxing, stripping, and polishing. (E-M) - Performs minor and/or basic carpentry, electrical, plumbing, and building maintenance work. (E-M) - Moves, repairs, assembles, and installs furniture and equipment. (E-M) - Opens and closes the Council Chambers and assists those utilizing the facility. (E) - Performs minor maintenance work, such as replacing light fixtures and ballasts, regulation of ventilation and temperature, and setting alarms. - Operates light duty equipment and machinery and be able to perform minor repairs and adjustments. (E) - Dusts and cleans furniture and fixtures. - Washes windows, walls, doors, and other surfaces. - Cleans and maintains restroom and supplies. (E) - May perform mail delivery and messenger work. - Sweeps sidewalks and removes debris from immediate grounds and parking lots. - Performs maintenance and cleaning of the Civic Center water fountain. - Performs special custodial and maintenance work upon request of Department Heads or supervisory staff. - Inspects facilities continually to assure security of all entrances. - Trains, supervises, and evaluates temporary employees and Summer Youth workers. - Performs other related duties as assigned. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: - Safe working practices. - Effective use of chemicals, cleaning solutions, and equipment used in custodial work. - Basic carpentry, electrical, and plumbing techniques. - Basic methods, materials, tools, and equipment used in minor building maintenance. Ability to: - Understand and carry out oral and written instructions. - Use cleaning materials and equipment with skill and efficiency. - Work independently in the absence of supervision. - Perform all physical aspects of assigned duties, including stooping, lifting, reaching, climbing ladders, and moving furniture and equipment. - Perform semi-skilled tasks in the maintenance of buildings and related facilities. - Perform heavy manual labor and lift up to 50 pounds. .Are Here To Serve" - Establish and maintain cooperative relationships with those contacted in the course of work. - Stand for periods of up to four hours at a time. - Work various shift hours. EXPERIENCE Two years of custodial/maintenance experience. EDUCATION Completion of formal or informal education sufficient to assure the ability to read and write at the level required for successful job performance. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT Possession of a valid Class C California Drivers License. PROBATIONARY PERIOD Employees serve a six-month probationary period. If performance is not satisfactory, an employee may be terminated without cause and recourse during this time. 3:PER/CUST JOB DESCRIPTION CITY OF UKIAH DEFINITION Under general supervision to be responsible for the care, upkeep, cleaning, and related duties as required of City building, related public facilities, .and grou~d~. 'EXAMPLES OF 'DUIXES ~Non-inclusive) -Maintain floor areas - sweep, vacuum, shampoo, mop, wax, strip, and polish .-Dust and clean furniture and fixtures .-Washes windows, walls, doors,' and other surfaces -Clean and maintain restroom and supplies -Move and arrange furniture and equipment -May perform mail delivery and messenger work -Perfom minor maintenance work such as replacing light fixtures, regulation of ventilation 'and temperature, setting alarms -Operate light duty equipment and machinery and be able to perfom minor repairs and adjustments -May perfom or assist in performing minor and/or basic carpentry, electrical, plumbing, and building maintenance work -Sweep sidewalks and remove debris from immediate grounds and parking lot -Perfom special custodial work upon request of Department Heads or Supervisory staff -Perform related duties as assigned QUAT.TFICATIONS Knowledge of: -Safe working practices -Effective use of chemicals,' cleaning solutions, and equitmnent used in custodial work -Basic carpentry, electrical, and plumbing techniques -Basic methods, materials, tools, and equipment used in minor building maintenance Ability ,.to: -Understand and carry out oral and written instructions -Use cleaning materials and equipment with skill and efficiency -Work independently in the absence of supervision -Perfom all physical aspects of assigned duties, including stooping, lifting, reaching, climbing ladders, and moving furniture and equipment -Perfom semi-skilled tasks in the maintenance of buildings and related facilities -Maintain harmonious and cooperative working relations with other City employees and the public Experience: -Tw~ years of custodial experience ~Education: -Completion of formal or informal education sufficient to assure the ability to read and write at the level required for successful job performance -2- 300 UKIAH, CA 95482-5400 · ADMIN. 707/463-6200 · PUBLIC SAFELY 463-6242/6274 · · FAX # 707/463-6204 JOB DESCRIPTION AIRPORT ASS ISTANT DEFINITION Under supervision, to perform a variety of semi-skilled and clerical work in the servicing of aircraft; to assist in the general operation of the airport; and to perform related work as assigned. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES: (These examples are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work performed. The examples of work performed are neither restricted to nor all-encompassing of the duties to be performed under this job title.) (E=Essential Duty; M=Major Portion of Time) - Supervises the use of airport facilities by tenants and transient aircraft. (M-E) - Directs and parks transient aircraft and assists pilots and passengers arriving at and departing from the airport. (M-E) - Supervises the City-operated Avgas facilities and fuels a variety of aircraft. (M-E) - Attends Airport Commission meetings and serves as staff representative. (E) - Assists in the enforcement of Federal and local regulations pertaining to aviation and the safety of the public. (E) - Inspects parked aircraft to ascertain that they have been secured properly. (M-E) - Assists in the negotiation, preparation, and administration of contracts and lease agreements. - Assists in the training and supervision of Airport personnel. - Coordinates airport-related activities with other City departments and outside agencies. - Responds to emergency situations. (E) - Maintains detailed records and prepares reports relative to airport operations. (E) - Provides information pertaining to airport operations, policies, rentals, fees, and field rules. (M-E) - Collects for hangar, tie-down, ground, and office rentals. (M-E) - Accepts payment and issues receipts on gas and oil sales. - Maintains inventories of petroleum products and requisitions products when necessary. (E) - Inspects runways, taxiways, and lighting systems, and makes minor repairs as necessary. - Performs semi-skilled work in a variety of building trades. - Assists in the general maintenance and day-to-day upkeep of the airport. - Operates light equipment. - Works flexible hours, including weekends and holidays. - Performs other related duties as assigned. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledqe of: - General airport operations and safety principles. - Service, maintenance, and storage of aircraft. - Federal Air Regulations relating to general airport operations. - Principles of ground and building maintenance, repair, and modification. - Principles of training and supervision. 'We Are Here To Serve" Ability to: - Assist in the management of a modern airport. - Assist in the training and supervision of part-time employees. - Communicate effectively orally and in writing, and present conclusions before advisory bodies and other staff. - Interpret, apply, and explain regulations, ordinances, and Federal and State legislation. - Keep accurate records and perform simple arithmetical calculations. - Establish and maintain cooperative relationships with those contacted in the course of work. - Prepare reports. - Understand and carry out oral and written instructions. - Work independently in the absence of supervision. - Perform all physical aspects of assigned duties, including stooping, lifting, reaching, and climbing. - Perform semi-skilled work in a variety of building and grounds maintenance work, and lift up to 40 pounds. - Work flexible hours, including weekends and holidays. EXPERIENCE AND EDUCATION Any combination of education and experience equivalent to graduation from high school and two years of experience in servicing or repairing aviation, automotive, or related equipment. Experience in airport operations preferred. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT Possession of a valid Class C California Drivers License. PROBATIONARY PERIOD Employees serve a six-month probationary period. If performance is not satisfactory, an employee may be terminated without cause and recourse during this time. 3: PER/AIR.ASST CITY OF UKIAII AIRPORT ATTENDANT DEFINITION · , .~nder~ ~supervisi. on.,,,~., .to ~.perform,~a ..~'variety.?of ~,sem,i,:ski:l~l:ed~,~and .~:cleri,ca ] work · ~':.~n.,'%he': ~ ervici ng..'of.:'aircraf 1: ~.'and <~t. he.~general :~.,ope ra%.ion i~: of .~:the-~ a ~ rport; and 'to do related ~ork'a$ 'assigned. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES .~ Direct.and park transient-aircraft and assist pilots and passengers arriving at.,. and 'departing. :from :..the ~i,rport. Fuel . .a .variety-- of aircrafts. · Accept cash and issue receipts on gas and .oil sales. · :. Check parked aircraft .to...ascertain,.that they ~.have ..been .secured, properly. :-Mainta in detai led 'records 'of'operations. · Give out information pertaining to air'port operations. Collect for hangar, tie-down, grounci and office rents. Maintain. inventories.,of,,..petro]eum pr,.oducts ,and requ,isition .when .necessary, Inspect runways, taxiways, and'lighting systems and make minor repairs as necessary. Perform semi-skilled work in'a variety of building trades. ' Perform grounds and equipment maintenance as necessary. Operate light equipment. .qUAL I F I CAT IONS Knowledge of: General airport Servicing and operations and safety principles. storing aircraft. Abi 1 i ty to- Ke.ep accurate records and to do simple arithmetic calculations. · Establish and maintain'cooperative relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Prepare reports. · Perform general building and grounds maintenance work. · Experience One year of experience in servicing or repairing aviation, automotive or related equipment. Educati'on Equivalent to'completion of" twelfth grade. Necessa,ry Special ReQuirement Possession of an appropriate California driver's license. ITEM NO. 6e DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION DECLARING OBSOLETE ITEMS AS SURPLUS Pursuant to the adopted procedures for the sale of surplus property, Staff is forwarding the lists of obsolete items for City Council action. Adoption of a resolution declaring these materials and equipment as surplus authorizes the Purchasing Officer to dispose of them in the most advantageous manner. Included in the lists are vehicles, rolling stock equipment, a shredder, and miscellaneous piping/irrigation materials. Staff intends to follow the procedures listed in the "Procedures for Sales of Surplus or Obsolete Materials, Used Equipment, and Supplies" Statement adopted by the City Council on May 20, 1992. Section 5(e) will be utilized for the surplus fire engine which will be handled as described in the November 16, 1995 memorandum from the Fire Department. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution declaring items from the Fire, Golf, Police, and Public Works departments as surplus. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Declaring Obsolete Items as Surplus. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Determine additional items are to be considered, add or delete items from the lists, and adopt amended Resolution. 2. Determine disposition should not take place and do not adopt resolution. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Acct. No.: NA (if budgeted) NA Gordon Elton, Director of Finance Nora Kennedy, Purchasing Warehouse Supervisor Michael F. Harris, Assistant to the City Manager and Candace Horsley, City Manager. 1. Resolution with lists of items as Exhibit A. 2. November 16, 1995 memorandum from Fire Department. 3. "Procedures for Sales of Surplus or Obsolete Materials, Used Equipment, and Supplies" Statement adopted May 20, 1992. APPROVED: ',.~ ~ Candace Horsley, City h~anager mfh:asrcc surplus12695 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH DECLARING ITEMS DETERMINED TO BE SURPLUS OR OBSOLETE AS SURPLUS ITEMS WHEREAS, Ukiah City Code Section 1533 authorizes and requires departments to report surplus property to the Purchasing Officer; and WHEREAS, Ukiah City Code Section 1533 is supplemented by a City Council approved procedure statement for the disposal of surplus property; and WHEREAS, the City Departments have reported to the Purchasing Officer that items listed on Exhibit A, attached hereto, are obsolete or unusable, and are surplus equipment or supplies no longer usable by those departments; and WHEREAS, Section 1533 and the 'Procedures for Sales of Surplus or Obsolete Materials, Used Equipment, and Supplies" Statement (Surplus Property Procedure Statement) Statement authorizes the Purchasing Officer to dispose of such items. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby declare the Items listed in Exhibit A as surplus and further authorizes the City Purchasing Officer to dispose of said surplus items as provided in Ukiah City Code Section 1533 and the Surplus Property Procedure Statement. vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1995, by the following roll call Attest: Cathy McKay, City Clerk R:4:Res Surplus. 1 Fred Schneiter, Mayor [!TY OF UK!RH 300 SEMINARY AVE. UKIAH, CA 95482 COHPLETE Tills FORM AND SUBMIT TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. SALE OF SURPLUS OR OBSOLETE MATERIALS/USED EQUIPMENT AND _SUPPLIES DATE: . REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER: i._OEPARIMENI : l OUANTIIY ON HA~D QUANT I TY SOLD DESCRlPT I0~ ESTIMATED VALUE SALES PRICE OEpARIMEN! SIGNAIURE: DAlE ' r u'~U"RE: ~ DAVE , E: 1' TV OF UKI' RH .. 300 SEMINARY AVE. UKIAH, CA 95482 COMPLETE TH~S F,ORM AND SUBMIT TO SRLE OF SURPLUS OR OBSOLETE MATERIALs/UsED EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES_ DATE:_ QUANTITY ON HAND QUANTITY SOLD FINANCE SIGNA : CITV OF UKIAH 300 SEMINARY AVE. UKIAH, CA 95482 COMPLETE THIS FORM AND SUBMIT TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. QUANTITY ON HAND QUANTITY SOLD SALE OF SURPLUS OR OBSOLETE MATERIALS/USED EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED SALES VALUE PRICE T SIGN, TURE: NANCE SIGNATURE: DATE DATE £ITY OF. UKIFIH 300 SEMINARY" AVE. -UKIAH, CA 9'5482 COMPLETE THIS FORM AND SUBMIT TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. SRLIE OF SURPLUS OR OBSOLETE HATERIALS/USED EQUIPMENT AND _SUPPL IES~- DATE' / /'"' ~O -~,~'"-- REVENUE ACCOUNT* NUMBER: PAR ! HEN "[: ~ QUANTITY ON HAND QUANTITY S~LD DESCRIPTION --., ;NA : SIGNAf~ ,,/ IiATE / /'- I /×/~/?~. ,~. SALES PRICE MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 16, 1995 Nora Kennedy, Purchasing Roe M. Sandelin, Operations Commander SALE OF SURPLUS FIRE ENGINE (ENGINE 5) The Fire Department intends to sell a surplus fire engine. This vehicle became excess with the arrival of our newest engine, a 1995 Pierce triple combination pumper. Normal practice for the sale of used vehicles in the City of Ukiah is to announce the vehicle for sale, state a minimum bid, and then open bids on a specified date. Because fire engines are rather specialized types of equipment it is very difficult to assess what might be the market value at a given point in time. Funding availability, especially for the small rural departments that buy this type of apparatus, may require special handling to complete the sale of such a vehicle. Finding an interested buyer willing to pay a fair price can take time. We want to create a situation that results in securing a sale that maximizes the return to the City. To that end it is requested the Fire Department be allowed to sell the vehicle under the following guidelines: 1. Initially, advertise the vehicle throughout Mendocino County. This would provide an opportunity for fire agencies most likely to provide mutual aid assistance to the City of Ukiah to bid on the vehicle. It is in the City's interests for it's neighbors to have good firefighting equipment. 2. Establish an "asking price" of $12,500 for the vehicle and a limited compliment of equipment. Establish a minimum price of $10,000. 3. Authorize staff to make all reasonable efforts to negotiate the highest possible sale that falls within the established price range. It is the opinion of Fire Department staff that a higher sale price may be achieved utilizing the method outlined herein. The North Fire Station, with it's very high volume of drive-by traffic, offers an excellent location for display of the engine during business hours. The Fire/Police maintenance facility is located there, so the Maintenance Supervisor is available to speak to the mechanical condition of the engine should there be inquiries. And, quite frankly, he is a very capable negotiator when it comes to selling "pre-owned" emergency vehicles. AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. 8a DATE: December 6, 1995 REPORT SUBJECT: Introduction of Proposed Ordinance (Zoning Code Amendment 94-39) - Downtown Parking Improvement Program SUMMARY: On March 15, 1995, the City Council opened and closed a public headng conceming the introduction of proposed Zoning Code amendments intended to implement the provisions of the Downtown Parking Improvement Program. However, the Ordinance was not introduced because eadier that evening, the City Council tabled the Downtown Parking Improvement Program, and directed staff to resolve a number of problems, and make changes to the text. On November 1, 1995, the City Council formally adopted the Downtown Parking Improvement Program. Accordingly, staff is initiating the Zoning Code amendments to implement a number of provisions in the Plan. (continued next page) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. City Council adopt Negative Declaration 94-39, finding no significant environmental impacts 2. Introduce the proposed Ordinance amending the Off-Street Parking and Loading requirements contained in Article 12, Chapter 2 of the Ukiah Zoning Code ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: 1. Do not adopt the Negative Declaration, and do not introduce the proposed Ordinance Acct. No. (if not Budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: (if budgeted) Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: No Requested by: Planning Department Prepared by: Charley Stump, Senior Planner Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager, Bob Sawyer, Planning Director, and David Rapport, City Attomey Attachments: 1. Ordinance amending Sections 9198(B) and 9199 of the Ukiah Municipal Code 2. Planning Commission staff report 3. Minutes to the December 14, 1994 Planning Commission meeting 4. Negative Declaration and Initial Study 5. Letter received from the Air Quality Management District, dated December 14, 1994 6. Minutes to the March 15, 1995 City Council meeting APPROVED: ~¢an~ce Horsley, City~/la!ager Approval of the Zoning Code amendments would essentially relax parking requirements in the downtown parking district. Specifically, three (3) changes are proposed to Section 9199 of the Zoning Code: 1) changing the requirements for new construction projects from providing one (1) parking space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet of gross leasable space, to one space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet of net leasable space; 2) adding language that reduces automobile parking spaces if bicycle parking spaces are included in projects; and 3) new language is proposed that would establish an in-lieu parking fee provision within the parking district to allow property owners of small parcels to propose development with the "purchase" of off-site parking spaces. The collected fees would fund development of new parking spaces or enhancement of existing parking facilities. On December 14, 1994, the City Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the Negative Declaration and adoption of the Zoning Code Amendments. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attachment 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING ARTICLE 12, CHAPTER 2, OF THE UKIAH CITY ZONING CODE - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING The City Council of the City of Ukiah does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION ONE Ukiah City Code Section 9198(B), NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED, is amended to read as follows: B. Retail, Commercial and Service Uses: 1. Retail stores, offices, commercial banks, savings and loan offices, food stores, drug stores, appliance repair shops, and similar uses: one parking space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross leasable space except within the City of Ukiah Parking District #1 boundaries where the requirement is one parking space for each three hundred fifty (350) square feet of net leasable space. (Differential is result of available public parking provided within the district). Similar uses having drive-up windows or drive-through facilities shall have stacking area for five (5) vehicles. SECTION TWO Ukiah City Code Section 9199, EXEMPTIONS FROM OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, is amended to read as follows: A. Existing Commercial Structures: 1. All existing commercial structures as of January 1, 1979 within the area defined as the City of Ukiah Parking District No. 1, shall be exempt from the required off-street parking requirements prescribed in (Section) 9198. This exemption applies to changes in the structure, a sale of the property or business or expansion into existing structure space. New commercial construction including demolition, reconstruction, structural additions and existing or new residential uses within said district are not exempt. The exemption provided in this Section does not require vadance approval by the Planning Commission or the City Council. B. Bicycle Parking Facility Exemption: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. A parking space exemption may be granted to projects involving new construction at a rate of one (1) vehicle space for every three (3) bicycle spaces provided. This exemption shall not exceed two (2) vehicle parking spaces per parcel. A bicycle parking space is a designated area with a facility designed for the parking and securing of bicycles. C. In-Lieu Fees: 1. Owners of property (a single parcel or combination of contiguous parcels) smaller than 7000 square feet in area may pay an in-lieu parking fee rather than providing all the required on-site parking spaces. The increased developable portion of the parcel that would have been used for vehicle parking spaces, shall not be solely used for structure(s) or building expansion. A reasonable amount of the area, as determined by the City Design Review Board, shall be landscaped and/or developed as an outdoor component of the project. 2. Owners who propose to construct, demolish, reconstruct or make structural additions to a commercial structure on a parcel of land consisting of less than 7000 square feet may elect to pay a fee in-lieu of providing on-site parking spaces as provided in Section 9198. The actual amount of the fee per parking space shall be established pursuant to Sections 9542 and 9544 of the Ukiah Municipal Code. 3. All in-lieu fees for parking purposes shall be used by the City of Ukiah for the construction or improvement of automobile or bicycle parking facilities or altemative transportation facilities at an appropriate time which serves the employees and customers of the commercial area within Parking District No. 1. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner shall pay the required in-lieu fee to the City. SECTION THREE This ordinance shall be published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ukiah. SECTION FOUR This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after adoption. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED AND ADOPTED this call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: City Clerk Cathy McKay day of ,1995, by the following roll Mayor Fred Schneiter Attachment 2 CITY OF UKIAH PLANNING REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: December 7, 1994 City of Ukiah Planning Commission City of Ukiah Planning Department SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Code Amendments - Downtown Parking Improvement Program APPLICANT: City of Ukiah Redevelopment Agency PROJECT SUMMARY: Approval of the zoning code amendments would relax parking requirements in the downtown parking district. Specifically, three (3) changes are proposed to Section 9199 of the Zoning Code: 1) changing the requirements for new construction projects from providing one (1) parking space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet of ~ross leasable space, to one space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet of net leasable space; 2) adding language that reduces automobile parking spaces if bicycle parking spaces are included in projects; and 3) new language is proposed that would establish an in-lieu parking fee provision within the parking district to allow property owners of small parcels to propose development with the "purchase" of off-site parking spaces. The collected fees would fund development of new parking spaces or enhancement of existing parking facilities. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed Zoning Code amendments pertain to the area within the Downtown Parking District No.1 (see attached map). DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission 1) approve the Negative Declaration and proposed zoning code amendments; and 2) direct staff to prepare a draft ordinance reflecting the amendments and advance to the City Council for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City of Ukiah as lead agency has determined that no significant environmental effects are associated with the project, and has prepared a Negative Declaration (attached). GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The area within Parking District No. 1 is predominantly designated as commercial in the Ukiah General Plan. ZONING DISTRICT: The majority of the area within Parking District No. 1 is zoned C-1 (Light Commercial). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The actual Zoning Ordinance Amendments proposed are as follows: ,, Section 9198 (B) - Amend language from"~ross leasable area" to "net. leasable area". . Section 9199 - add paragraphs discussing in-lieu fee provision and bike parking exemption. The recommended amendments and language additions are detailed in attachment No. 2. STAFF ANALYSIS: A number of issues were identified during review of the proposed amendments and language additions to the Zoning Code. The following text discusses the issues and provides an analysis of each proposed amendment: Gross Leasable Space vs Net Leasable Space Calculating the number of required parking spaces using net rather than gross square footage of buildings would eliminate non-commercially used spaces, such as mechanical equipment areas and hallways from being factored into the total. The result would be a less number of parking spaces being required than before. This reduction in required parking may or may not be of much consequence, depending upon how much non-commercially used space is proposed in buildings. However, it does seem appropriate to calculate the number of required spaces using the amount of floor space that would be utilized by customers. The reduction, in conjunction with other proposed amendments could also serve to discourage automobile usage, and promote alternative forms of transportation into the downtown. The potential reduction in the required number of parking spaces for a development could result in additional commercially useable floor area that would utilize the space previously dedicated for parking. However, it is not anticipated that an additional one to two hundred square feet of floor area (1 standard parking space = 171 square feet), would have an adverse effect on the function or aesthetics of the downtown area. Staff is able to conclude that this proposed Zoning Code amendment appears practical, would not cause administrative burdens, would not result in a significant increase in density, and would not adversely impact the aesthetics within the downtown area. In-Lieu Fee Provision The proposed amendments include the establishment of in-lieu parking fees provision within the parking district to allow property owners of parcels smaller than 7000 square feet to pay an in-lieu fee rather than providing all the required off-street parking spaces. For properties within one hundred feet of a City owned parking facility or privately owned, publically accessible facility, an attempt shall be made by the applicant of a development project to secure long term lease agreements or other legal mechanisms to provide required parking spaces prior to pursuing the option of paying in-lieu fees. The amount of the in-lieu fee will depend upon the number of spaces being "purchased." The fee will be based upon the costs associated with the acquisition of land, and design and construction of an actual parking space. The total is divided by 2 to reflect a 50% participation by the City. This factor is necessary because the City will eventually own the land funded by the developer, and will gain annual revenue in perpetuity on each space. Accordingly, the following formula would be used to determine the exact fee: Average cost of land (300 square feet) in the Downtown Parking District Estimated cost for constructing I parking space EXAMPLE: 300 sq ft x $12.00 per sq ft + $2944.00 = $6544 divided by 2 = $3272 per space DIVIDED BY 2 = Fee The project developer shall be responsible for funding the necessary appraisal of the land, and securing the required bid for constructing the parking space. The establishment of an in-lieu fee would provide flexibility to both the project developer and City in determining how and where parking facility development will occur. Bicycle Space Exemption It is proposed that a parking space exemption may be granted to projects involving new construction at a rate of one (1) vehicle space for every three (3) bicycle spaces provided. This exemption shall not exceed two (2) vehicle parking spaces per parcel. The purpose of this exemption is to promote and encourage the use of bicycles in the downtown. It is not anticipated that this additional code provision would have adverse effects on the parking scheme in the downtown, because theoretically, by providing bicycle parking, more people would ride bicycles into the downtown, and less automobile parking spaces would be necessary. The exemption could provide a small amount of additional area for building square footage or landscaping treatments. This is not regarded as significant, because the exemption will not exceed two spaces per parcel. CONCLUSIONS: Staff is able to conclude that the proposed Zoning Code amendments are appropriate and necessary to implement the provisions of the Downtown Revitalization Master Plan. The amendments would provide flexibility in how vehicle parking is accommodated in the downtown, and would help to emphasize and encourage the use of bicycles to access the City's commercial core area. ATTACHMENTS: . Draft Revised Chapter 2, Article 17, Ukiah Municipal Code. Negative Declaration ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The following personnel respectively prepared and reviewed this planning report. Charley Stump, Senior Planner Robert Sawyer, Planning Director Attachment 3 ROLL CALL voTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Ashiku, Howland, Menton, Randolph, Smith, and Chairman Hoppe. None. None. None. el Zoninq Code Amendments associated with a proposed Downtown Parkin~n Improvement Proqram. The proposed Zoning Code amendments involve chanQinq Section 9198 (B) of the Ukiah Municipal Code to calculate the number of required parkin.q spaces for retail, commercial and services uses within the City of Ukiah Parkinq District No. 1 for each 350 square feet of net leasable space, rather than .qross leasable space; and to add two new para.qraphs to Section 9199 to provide an in-lieu parkin.q fee provision for parcels smaller than 7,000 square feet in the downtown area, and a reduction in required parkin.q spaces when bicycle parkin.q facilities are incorporated into the desi.qn of projects. A Neqative Declaration of Environmental Impacts has been prepared for the proposed Zoninn Code amendments pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. The Downtown Parkinq Improvement Program is intended to implement the policies and directives identified in the Downtown Revitalization Master Plan, adopted in June of 1992. The pro.qram addresses and provides for the implementation of the followinq Master Plan directives: 1) Provide new and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the downtown; 2) Utilization of existinq lots for desi.qnated downtown employee and jury duty parkin.q, and incentives for use; 3) Adiustment of parkin.q time zones alonq School Street; 4) Elimination of metered parking; 5) Development of handicapped parking facilities; 6) Parking resource improvements; 7) Improvements to public transportation; and 9) Conceptual identification of future improvements. Senior Planner Charley Stump advised the Downtown Parking Improvement Program does not require Planning Commission approval, however, the Ukiah Redevelopment Agency, who are the authors of the program, felt it would be prudent and necessary for the Commission to review and express their comments concerning the Program. The Redevelopment Agency would like to share the Program with the Commission because of their role in the community as policy makers and over-seers of growth and development in the community. He discussed the three minor Zoning Code amendments, which are required as part of this Program. Chairman Hoppe inquired if the Commission could be provided a map showing the various lots, which was not included in the packets. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 9 DECEMBER 14, 1994 Larry DeKnoblough, Assistant Redevelopment Director, left the meeting to obtain maps for the Planning Commission. ' Mr. Stump distributed comments received from the City Attorney pertaining to the Zoning Code. He discussed a letter from the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District and the Ukiah Alternative Transportation Task Force which was distributed to the Commission as well. Staff has consulted with these two agencies concerning the Program and is supportive of the recommendations they made in previous discussions with staff. Chairman Hoppe discussed a letter the Commission received about a month ago from Catherine Houston, Public Defenders Office, concerning the employee requirements in the parking lots. Commissioner Randolph inquired if this Program is intended to be carried through to the General Plan developments in the Land Use Code. Mr. Stump advised that the "Land Use Code", will likely include many revised ordinances (zoning, subdivisions, building) as directed by the General Plan. Commissioner Pruden discussed the historical background of the Parking Program and how a citizens advisory group met, over a four year period, to develop a Downtown Master Plan. The Downtown Master Plan created mechanisms to allow other things to be developed, such as the parking program. Staff was instructed to make the Downtown Master Plan compatible with the new General Plan. The new General Plan, for example, strongly emphasizes alternate modes of transportation. There wasn't enough instruction and compatibility to our new General Plan with this parking program, and staff went back through and made sure it aligned very closely with the General Plan. Theoretically, it appears the two documents will mesh. Neither one will have to be changed because this reflects the new draft General Plan as we are now discussing it." Mr. DeKnoblough noted that the Commission should be aware that other public input has been attained. The Agency has completed a process of soliciting public comments through advertisement in the newspaper and its own newsletters, and forwarding it to the Downtown Merchants in order to obtain as much input as possible. This has been very successful. The Program was also discussed by the Traffic Engineering Committee. He noted there were also informal telephone discussions with citizens. Chairman Hoppe inquired if there was any response to Ms. Houston's comments in her letter to the City. She noted Ms. Houston's concern with the distance which she would need to walk to work. This was based on a newspaper article. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that part of the structure in the Parking Program directives is MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 10 DECEMBER 14, 1994 to try to locate parking facilities and resources as near as possible to the work place without impacting the retail districts. As soon as the Program is set up, they'will be developing a schedule of workshops with various employer groups to make them aware of where parking locations will be available to them. He advised that Ms. Houston's concern has been alleviated through information presented to her office. He noted that the article in the newspaper did not clarify where they would be able to park and the concept of utilizing on street resources for parking permits is to provide parking within 200 feet of any work place. He discussed situations where an employee may have an unique vehicle which is only able to park in certain conditions, and noted customized parking locations would be developed to accommodate various needs. Chairman Hoppe noted that throughout the Program, it refers to pedestrian improvements and the use of bicycles being encouraged. She inquired as to how these would be implemented. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that there would be incentives in the course of development. The Redevelopment Agency will include bike racks and bike paths throughout the downtown as part of the streetscaping and recirculation plans which will be completed after the General Plan is adopted. He discussed enhancing pedestrian walkways through cross walk treatments, and other traffic calming measures, and removing the pedestrian barriers along State Street. He discussed viable parking spaces along Main Street which are not being utilized. These measures are discussed in the Parking Program and will be part of the street improvements and streetscaping efforts. Chairman Hoppe addressed Page 14 of the Negative Declaration concerning housing. She discussed the house located at 351 South Oak Street which is being demolished to allow additional room for a parking lot. She felt housing is being lost but is not being recorded in the Negative Declaration. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that it is not part of the Program, but is referenced in the Program as a project which is being completed. He explained that, since the drafting of this document to the Master Plan Committee, the status of that project has changed. That particular parking lot project went forward as a separate project and has already been reviewed and approved, with environmental review specific to that project. Chairman Hoppe inquired if there was mitigation for the loss of that housing unit. She expressed concern for the loss of housing units in the downtown area. It was her opinion that if we are trying to find ways for people to live in the downtown, and then take down the little housing which is there and not replace it, the City is going backwards rather than forwards. She noted that the project was not brought before the Planning Commission for consideration. Commissioner Pruden express the same concern. She explained that she had MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 11 DECEMBER 14, 1994 considerable discussion with Mr. Stump about this matter. She felt the documents are either misleading or things are not been explained clearly. She was under the impression that this Negative Declaration applied to the Parking Program. She felt that the "NO" check in the housing section of the Negative Declaration was incorrect and expressed concern that the cultural resources box wasn't checked properly either. She felt that the property at 351 South Oak Street was exclusionary to this process. As Chairman of the Demolition Review Committee, she never saw an environmental impact report or Negative Declaration filed on the demolition of that house, nor paper work presented at the Committee level. She found it looking very slippery and was not comfortable with it. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that the family who occupied the home at 351 South Oak Street was relocated and there were no specific mitigation in the Negative Declaration for the loss of the single housing unit. He explained that the project was approved in April 1994. He advised that the demolition permit is a ministerial permit and, therefore, exempt. Therefore, it would not require review beyond the exemption. Notice of Exemptions were filed on that project. The Negative Declaration for the parking lot was adopted by the City Council on April 6, 1994. It was his recollection that it did not address the replacement. The reason why the parking lot was not brought before the Planning Commission is because it is not required to come before the Planning Commission according to the Zoning Code. The project went forward to the City Council. Chairman Hoppe asked why the Planning Commission did not see it and expressed her concern for the loss of housing units in the downtown area. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that it is not a project under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission" because it is construction of a parking lot. There are no permit requirements for construction of parking lots. It is being brought to the Planning Commission because the Redevelopment Agency is seeking the Commission's input, as they did with the Traffic Engineering and any other public bodies which might oversee components of the Program. Basically staff should correct this within the Program itself, that on Page 6, under future improvements, the opening sentence should be changed. It is an outdated statement and it should have been changed "at the time the project was approved" instead of "currently being proposed". Mr. Stump advised that if the Planning Commission wishes to review the design of new parking lots in the future, they should, with City Council support, direct staff that provisions be included in future Zoning Code revisions to provide this. He noted that the Commission's sentiment is probably that they would like to review the parking lots and express their comments, prior to approval by the City Council. Mr. DeKnoblough explained that the current demolition review process does provide that the demolition permit does not go forward to the Planning Commission. That part of the project, regardless of the parking lot, would not have come to the Planning Commission. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 12 DECEMBER 14, 1994 It is entirely conceivable that even if the Agency brought the parking lot to the Planning Commission for review, it would have been at a time after the house was der~olished. The demolition process is being reviewed by staff and the City Council at this time. If the Commission wishes to be involved in the demolition of structures, staff suggested it make a formal request and have it reviewed by the City Council for their approval. He explained that the Agency has not tried to circumvent the Planning Commission in any stage of this demolition or parking lot project, but rather that since it was not in the Commission's jurisdiction, it did not come before the Commission for review. He explained that the parking lot is a separate program and proceeded independently of the demolition process. Discussion followed concerning the Planning Commission's lack of jurisdiction in the demolition permit process, and the loss of housing units through this process. There was also discussion concerning potential parking lots in the community which result in the loss of housing units. Some members of the Commission expressed a desire to review some redevelopment projects at their earliest stages of development. Mr. DeKnoblough explained that the replacement of housing units in the downtown area is encouraged in both the Master Plan and the Redevelopment Plan. There is no specific requirement in those plans for the Redevelopment Agency to replace units. He discussed other Redevelopment Agency housing assistance programs with 20% set-aside funds. He noted that none of the homes are within the downtown area but they re within the City Limits. Discussion followed concerning identifying the Redevelopment .Agency's responsibilities when the Commission reviews the Housing Element of the General Plan, specifically for the downtown area. A note was also made to look at the parking lot situation when the Commission reviews the Housing/Circulation Elements in order to develop policies. Mr. DeKnoblough explained that part of the review process of projects concerns the jurisdiction of various commissions and bodies which make decisions within the City government. There has been some concern with how the Design Review Board interacts with the Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Agency. He has discussed the matter with Planning Director Bob Sawyer and they would like to hold a workshop soon with the Planning Commission to address the Commission's concerns as to how the various jurisdictions overlap or interact. The Commission felt that a workshop would be beneficial. Commissioner Howland felt it is a good idea to educate the Commission concerning the roles of other departments and committees. The Planning Commission can't look at everything that effects us; if we did it would be called a kingdom and not a City. He did MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 13 DECEMBER 14, 1994 not believe anything was sleazy or shaky as was mentioned earlier by a Planning Commissioner. Perhaps there was a communication breakdown on who was responsible. He inquired if a house was going to be removed and if the Agency had to legally replaced the housing unit within the City limits or within the Sphere of Influence. He would like to know how the process works, and the Planning Commission needs to keep its hands off of the things that don't concern it. We need to know its happened but we don't need to try to control it all. Mr. Stump advised that staff is asking the Commission to take action on the Negative Declaration associated with the project. Commissioner Pruden advised that she has some fundamental deep problems with the process. Mr. Stump advised that the Downtown Parking Improvement Program would require three amendments to the existing Zoning Ordinance: 1) change the requirement for new construction projects from providing one new parking space for every 350 square feet of gross leasable area to 350 square feet of net leasable area; 2) adding lanes which reduce automobile parking spaces if bicycle parking spaces are provided in the project; and 3) establish an in-lieu provision for small parcels if they are under a certain threshold of 7,000 square feet, if they would be eligible to pay an in lieu feet rather than construct the required parking on site. He drew attention to the letter received from the City Attorney and its attachment which includes an illustration of the proposed amendments as they would appear in the Zoning Ordinance. This is a revision from the information submitted in the Commission's packets, which reflects the comments and concerns expressed by the City Attorney. The City Attorney suggested simplifying the in lieu fee provisions. The City Council would adopt a resolution which would outline how the fees would be calculated, etc. He explained that there would be a development in the ordinance whereby the developer can provide some, and possibly no parking spaces. He discussed factors such as close proximity to public parking and suggested that the area where mechanical equipment is located not be calculated as useable space. He discussed enhancing bike and pedestrian facilities and encouraging other modes of transportation in the downtown area. Mr. DeKnoblough explained that part of the objective is to create only enough spaces which are needed in the downtown area. They will respond to the demand, but only when the demand occurs. He noted that the downtown needs to function as a pedestrian environment. He explained there is discussion in the Master Plan concerning traffic calming measures and it recognized State Street as a vehicle barrier. He discussed the pedestrian view corridor along State Street. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 8:14 P.M. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 14 DECEMBER 14, 1994 Valerle Lawe, 2581 Twining Road, Talmage, advocated the use of bicycles thr.oughout the community. She noted that she is a member of the Alternative Transportation Task Force. They promote an event called "Bike To Work Day". Their goal is to promote alternative ways of transportation, walking, biking, transit, ride sharing, and telecommuting. She discussed their list of strategies, which were submitted to the Commission at an earlier date. She discussed holding the automobile subservient to pedestrian and bicycling traffic. The ride sharing component of these strategies was discussed. She encouraged the use of bike racks and giving preferential parking spaces to those who carpool. MTA would like to make available bus passes for sale at work places. She explained that in other communities it is cheaper to subsidize employees who commute to work alternatively. This can be done by buying employees walking shoes or a saddle bag for a bike, rather than buying a parking space for them. Her organization has discussed promoting competitive events and other creative activities for the community. They are available to conduct private promotions as well as working with the Ukiah Striders, Ukiah Wheelers, and MTA. She discussed how the Department of Social Services has gone to a four day, 10 hour day, work week. David Morrow, Mendocino Air Quality Control District, discussed their concems, which were identified in their letter submitted to the Commission, and how they have been working with City staff concerning the parking program. He felt the program will help to increase the viability of the downtown. Reducing excessive parking requirements helps to create a pedestrian friendly shopping area by reducing, over time, the total paved area. This helps keep the area cooler in summer, and allows businesses to be closer together. He supported staff's plan to locate employee parking in lots on the periphery of the area. He discussed the supply and demand for parking and the cost of renting parking space in the downtown area. In his traffic counts of the downtown area he noted that approximately 90% of the cars contain only one person and that the carpooling rate is very Iow. One of the reasons why the rate is Iow is because the parking spaces are free. He discussed managing the City's resource, parking, wisely. He recommended staff: . Develop a plan to provide preferred parking for carpoolers as part of an integrated transportation management plan for the City. . Develop an estimate of probable parking revenue, and show how this could be used to increase transit service in the downtown. . Develop a program for increasing parking prices, over three to five years, to levels closer to their true market value. . Develop a rideshare matching program and other employer-based incentives, such as on-site bus pass sales. Commissioner Pruden discussed the parking fees and noted that Mr. Morrow's written MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 15 DECEMBER 14, 1994 3--7 material is high quality and on numerous occasions it has been submitted at, the last moment. She expressed difficulty in reviewing information submitted at meetings and noted it is a chronic problem. Mr. Morrow responded that part of the reason he respond so late was because he did not receive a notice. He advised that he did not receive a copy of the parking program until 9:30 a.m. today and did not know about the hearing until today. He felt the biggest problem his agency has is that they are used to responding to CEQA documents which have a formal time line. In this particular case, it is something he initiated by hearing about the parking plan. Commissioner Pruden explained that the proposals submitted by Mr. Morrow at this meeting probably have not been reviewed by staff and it makes it difficult to factor them in with the discussion and the Planning Commission has not had an adequate time to review the material. Senior Planner Charley Stump advised that the matter has been discussed extensively with Mr. Morrow and it was noted that he was informed at a meeting three weeks ago that the Planning Commission meeting date would be December 14, 1994. He explained that the plan had been discussed previously with Mr. Morrow, Ms. Lawe, Mr. DeKnoblough at the meeting along with their suggestions and comments. Mr. DeKnoblough discussed the parking program and the intent of the Redevelopment Agency to continue discussion with the Alternative Transportation Task Force as the program develops. They have initiated discussions with MTA to begin the downtown shuttle. He discussed the ride sharing program. He noted there may be circulation requirements which will affect how the plan operates, after the General Plan is adopted. He advised that the current proposal has gone through the Downtown Master Plan Committee and, in its final form, will go back to them after adoption by the City Council. It will be an ongoing document. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 8:39 p.m. Commissioner Howland discussed Page 2 of the Downtown Parking Improvement Program, Directive B, Incentives, Enforcement, and Employee Parking, conceming the fines listed at the bottom of the page. He felt the fines listed are very high. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that the fines listed were arrived by consensus of the Master Plan Committee as a way to address the first offense as a warning, only, and to provide information to the violator as to how the parking program works and the ramifications of continued violations. He discussed violations within a 12 month period and how the current code allows for cumulative fines for subsequent violations. It is intended to establish the mandatory nature of employee permit parking. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 16 DECEMBER 14, 1994 Considerable discussion followed concerning the parking fines, how they were derived, and their intent. Commissioner Ashiku explained that a $200 fine imposed on a professional who holds a State license, will be denied their license. On their biannual renewal, if there is a fine over $100, they will be denied renewal of their State license. This relates to dentists, physiologist, and other individuals who hold a State license in Califomia. He stressed the importance of taking this into consideration. Discussion continued conceming proposed parking fines during a 12-month period. The Commission expressed a need for clarification of the 12-month period of time related to the number of parking tickets received by an individual. Commissioner Howland recommended the fines be reduced by 60-70%. He discussed directing the public rather than being punitive. He suggested the fines be $50 per violation. Mr. DeKnoblough discussed the procedure of parking violations being heard before a parking officer, which is the Director of Finance for the City. Commissioner Randolph felt the fines were too high. He inquired of staff if the general public or employees have had an opportunity to review the parking proposals. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that staff has requested input through a number of publications, and noted that the program, in its entirety, was published in the Ukiah Daily Joumal. Staff has taken the program to the Downtown Merchants Association and Main Street Program, and County public employee groups in the downtown area. Discussion followed concerning not using the program as a revenue raising tool, how to enforce and collect the fines (attach wages, small claims court, etc.), having the amount of the fine being negotiable, reporting parking tickets to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and the fines being referred for collection. A MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Randolph, seconded by Commissioner Ashiku, that the parking fines be lowered to $50, and that the Planning Commission is in general support of the Parking Program, with the exception of the fines. Commissioner Pruden felt there is a serious violation problem downtown which is seriously damaging the ability to do business. Employees in the downtown area take the premium parking and disregard the importance of tourist shopping and other people doing short term business downtown. The meter maids will be instructed to provide a great deal of flexibility to people who have just come into town to do business for the day. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 17 DECEMBER 14, 1994 Maybe they parked three and a half hours. They are probably not going to ticket them because they know that they are short time parkers. But they know the long term parkers and they know the people who chronically violate this to the extent that it damages downtown business. One of our chronic problems and misconceptions of the downtown is that there is no downtown parking because the premium parking is hogged by people who don't care about the downtown. Discussion followed concerning the City's enforcement policy concerning parking tickets and the fees charged for parking both for metered and permitted parking. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that one of the things which is occurring in the program is that there are approximately 60 people, who are downtown employees, waiting for parking permits because of the way in which the permit structure has been established. The parking program will alleviate that part of the problem. He discussed the situation with people receiving repeated tickets when parking permits are available upon request. Discussion followed concerning the fines being the same for both shoppers and employees who park in the downtown area and the time zones in which the parking is enforced. Commissioner Howland discussed item "B" concerning incentives and enforcement for employee parking. He recommended the general public be included. Mr. DeKnoblough advised that it should be identified in the time zone parking, as well, when discussing general public parking. Staff will include this in the program tO indicate the same fine will apply to everyone. He discussed the metering process and noted that three hour parking will be available at no cost, however, if an individual plans to be parked for a longer period of time, metered parking is available for up to 10 hours. Commissioner Howland called for the question. ON A MOTION by Commissioner Randolph, seconded by Commissioner Ashiku, it was carried by the following roll call vote, that the parking fines be lowered to $50, and that the Planning Commission is in general support of the Parking Program: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Ashiku, Howland, Menton, Randolph, and Chairman Hoppe. Commissioners Pruden and Smith. None. None. Chairman Hoppe noted that vigorous enforcement should be in order. The plan could also be reviewed after one year. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 18 DECEMBER 14, 1994 Attachment 4 CITY OF UKIAH PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (94-39) DATE: APPLICANT: PROJECT NO.: LOCATION: December 16, 1994 City Of Ukiah Zoning Code Amendment 94-39 Downtown Parking District No. 1 Description of Proposal: A number of amendments to the City Zoning Code are necessary to allow implementation of the Downtown Parking Improvement program. Approval of the Zoning Code amendments would essentially relax parking requirements in the downtown parking district. Specifically, three (3) changes are proposed to Section 9199 of the Zoning Code: 1) changing the requirements for new construction projects from providing one (1) parking space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet of _(]ross leasable space, to one space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet of net leasable space; 2) adding language that reduces automobile parking spaces if bicycle parking spaces are included in projects; and 3) new language is proposed that would establish an in-lieu parking fee provision within the parking distdct to allow property owners of small parcels to propose development with the "purchase" of off-site parking spaces. The collected fees would fund development of new parking spaces or enhancement of existing parking facilities. Environmental Setting: The downtown parking distdct area is densely urban, and is characterized by both old and new structures. Environmental Analysis: The City of Ukiah as lead agency has prepared an initial study of potential environmental impacts, and has concluded that no significant environmental effects would result from the project (attached). Findings Su~3Dortinq a Ne_clative Declaration: . The project area is within the urban core, and the proposed zoning code amendments are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Ukiah General Plan and Downtown Revitalization Master Plan, and no significant environmental impacts have been identified. . The project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the general public, because it will provide flexibility in how vehicle parking is accommodated in the downtown, and will help to emphasize and encourage the use of bicycles to access the City's commercial core area. Statement of Declaration: After appraisal of the possible impacts of this project, the minor amendments to the City Zoning Code, the City of Ukiah has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. This Negative Declaration constitutes compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. This document is available for public review at the City of Ukiah Planning Division, Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Ave., Ukiah, CA. Robert Sawyer Planning Director, City of Ukiah I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION le m o 1 m Se m Se Si Name of Project Proponent Ukiah Redevelopment A.qency Address of Project Proponent 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah Name of Project Downtown Parkinq Improvement Pro.qram - Zoninq Code Amendments Assessors Parcel Number(s) Various Date of Initial Study Preparation ~~--~-2'~',~--- /'~'~'/ /~4~ Name of Lead Agency Ukiah Plannin.q Department Address and Phone Number of Lead Agency 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah (707) 463-6200 Brief Project Description. (see attached) Person Responsible for Preparing Initial Study ~or Planner ~// DOWNTOWN PARKING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BACKG'ROUND In 1987, the City of Ukiah commissioned the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan for a part of the City. The purpose of the plan was to address the City's physical deterioration and loss of economic vitality. In March of 1989, a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the plan. In 1989, a supplemental EIR was prepared to add three (3) projects to the Redevelopment Plan. Both the original EIR and the Supplemental EIR were certified by the City. In 1992, the City Council and City Redevelopment Agency separately adopted the Ukiah Downtown Revitalization Master Plan (UDRMP). The current project is an implementation program for one (1) component of the UDRMP. ENVIRONMENTAL SE'ri'lNG The project area is situated within the City of Ukiah Parking District No. I area boundary (see attached Exhibit "A"). The setting is densely urban, and is characterized by both old and new structures ranging in height from one (1) to five (5) stories. Many structures are attached and form typical downtown commercial strips along Main, State, and School Streets. Predominant uses include retail and wholesale, restaurants, shopping centers, services establishments, professional offices, lodging, and some light processing and machine operations. The area also includes some residential land uses. Gibson Creek enters the northern project area flowing east to west. Even though most of the project area is densely urban, there are hundreds of beautiful mature native and introduced trees. Primary north-south circulation within the project area is provided by State Street, Main Street and School Street. The main east-west streets include Perkins Street, Standley Street, Smith Street, Church Street, and Stephenson Street. DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Downtown Parking Improvement Program is intended to implement the policies and directives identified in the Downtown Revitalization Master Plan, adopted in June of 1992. The program addresses and provides for the implementation of the following Master Plan directives: 1) Provide new and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the downtown; 2) Utilization of existing lots for designated downtown employee and jury duty parking, and incentives for use; 3) Adjustment of parking time zones along School Street; 4) Elimination of metered parking; 5) Development of handicapped parking facilities; 6) Parking resource improvements; 7) Amending the City zoning ordinance to reduce parking requirements in the downtown parking district; 8) Improvements to public transportation; and 9) Conceptual identification of future improvements. Enhancement of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities The Program includes bicycle parking facilities within the planned landscaped and pedestrian design components, and encourages bicycle use along all downtown streets except State Street. It provides for the addition of new bike parking racks strategically placed along downtown streets and within existing automobile parking facilities. Additionally, it provides a 'parking requirement exemption' for new construction projects at the rate of one (1) vehicle space for every three (3) bike spaces. The Program includes improving and developing pedestrian walkways within existing parking facilities. Designated Employee Parking and Use Incentives Specific off-street locations shall be designated as long-term parking for downtown district employees and citizens called to jury duty. Some on-street locations may be designated. If so, they will be outside the identified retail district. Proposed incentives for ensuring employee parking in designated locations includes ongoing public information outreach, and a system of fines for parking outside the facilities. Adjustment of Parking Time Zones The Program will reduce the parking times along School Street to meet specific needs of businesses and create a higher turnover of spaces. Enforcement will be throughout the district, so that a vehicle parking within the district for the maximum allowable time shall be required to vacate the downtown. A three-hour parking time limit will be established within the district except along School Street, which would have a two- hour limit. Additionally, a small number of 24-minute spaces will be established along each block of School Street to create a turnover of spaces for the destination visitor. Elimination of Metered Parking Metered on-street parking would be eliminated throughout the district and the 116 meters removed. This action is intended to enhance the aesthetic value of the streetscape, reduce the administrative costs associated with parking enforcement, and assist in the compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. Development of Handicapped Parking Facilities The Program proposes to install handicapped parking spaces within all municipal parking facilities at a ratio of one (1) space per twenty five (25) standard spaces. On-street handicapped spaces will be installed along School and Main Streets at a ratio of one (1) space per five hundred lineal feet of curb frontage. Parking Resource Improvements The Program proposes new landscaping treatments, decorative security lighting, enhanced and new pedestrian walkways within existing municipal parking facilities. All unnecessary loading and no parking zones will be eliminated to provide additional parking spaces. Zoning Ordinance Amendments: Reduction of Parkinq Requirements The Program directs amendments to the parking standards contained in the City zoning ordinance by requiring new construction projects to provide one (1) parking space for every three hundred fifty (350) square feet of net leasable space, rather than three hundred fifty (350) square feet of gross leasable space. Additionally, the Program proposes the establishment of in-lieu parking fees within the parking district to allow property owners of small parcels to propose development with the 'purchase' of off-site parking spaces. The actual Zoning Ordinance Amendments proposed are as follows: . Section 9198 (B) - Amend language from 'gross leasable area' to 'net leasable area'. Section 9199 - add paragraphs discussing in-lieu fee provision and bike parking exemption. Improvements to Public Transportation The Program proposes to establish, with the assistance of the Mendocino Transit Authority, a public transportation program for the downtown. This program would include a shuttle service between the Redwood Business Park, the Perkins Street shopping district, and the downtown. Development of Future Improvements The acquisition and eventual construction of new municipal parking facilities is envisioned as a possible future need. However, the Program does not include specific proposals for such acquisitions, nor does it include possible sites. Any future aqquisition and construction of new municipal parking facilities would be subject to individual CEQA analysis. NOTE: The text of the Downtown Parking Improvement Plan is included as Exhibit "B." 4--4 Downtown Parking Improvement Program Project Area CITY OF ~IAH .- Ctvtc C£N1'ER ST. WILL THE PROJECT RESULT No Not Significant Significant Cumulative IN THE FOLLOWING $1gnifir. ant Unless No Impacts ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: UlUgated Apparent Mitigation 1, EARTH: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes I~ I~ I~ I~ ~ in geologic structures. b. Disruptions, Displacements, !~ Com~,~,o,. o, ow.ow,~ o, ,o,,.__ ~ Cl ~ Cl ~. Ch~ in topography or ~round ~ surface relief features. I~ I~ !~ I~ I~ d. The destruction, covering, or ~ modification of any unique geologic or~ !~ [:~ I~ I~ physical features. e. Any increase in wind or water erosion I~ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands' °r changes in siltati°n' [~ I~1 [~1 [~1 [~ deposition, or erosion that may modify the channel of a river, stream, inlet, or bay? g. Exposure of people or property to ~ ge°logic hazards such as~ I~ I~ I~ [~ earthquakes. 2. AIR: deterioration of ambient air quality. b. The creation of objectional odors. c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. WATER: a. Changes in the currents, or the course of water movements, in either fresh or marine waters. b. Changes in the absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount of surface runoff. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters. d. ' Change in the amount of surface water in any water body. e. Discharge into surface water, or any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity. f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water. g. Change in the quantity of ground water, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations. h. Change in the quality of ground water. i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water °therwise available '°r public water supplies. j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tsunamis. 4. PLANT LIFE: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers c~f any species of plants including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants. c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, orin a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species. d. ReduclJon in acreage of any $. ANIMAL LIFE: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals including birds, land animals, reptiles, fish, insects, and bethnic organisms. b. Reduction in the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals. d' habitaL Detori°rati°n °' existing fish °r wildlife [~"/' [~ 6. NOISE: a. Increase in existing noise levels. b. Exposure of people to severe noise ,,v,,.. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE: b. Reduction'of solar exposure or collection facilities. 8. LAND USE= a. Sub,tantial alteration of the present or [~ [~ planned land use of a given ama. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: a. Increase in the rote of use of any natural resources. 10. RISK OF UPSET= a. . A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances, (including oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions. b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or evacuation plan. 11. POPULATION: a. Alterations in the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of human populations. 12. HOUSING: a. Will the proposal effect existing housing or create a demand for new housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION: vehicular ~ovement? demand for ~w ~ng fadlifies? t~spo~tion sys~ms? d. N~mtions to pm~nt ~ms of e. N~ations to wa~om.. ~,. or ~r traffic? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES: a. ~11 ~e pm~l have an effect upon. -' or m~lt in a ne~ for new or N~md government ~s in any of follo~ng areas: 1. Rmpmt~fion? 2. Poll. protection? 4. Pa~s & r~ma~on facilit~s? 6. O~er government, .~s? 15. ENERGY: oun, o,,u ,or ~no~ th~ ~volopmont o[ now 16. UTILITIES: a. Will the project result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following: 3. Transmission lines? I~ I~ I~ I~ 17. HUMAN HEALTH: a. Creation of any health hazard or [~ I~1 [~1 [~1 potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to any existing 18. A£$THETIC$: ¥iew open to tho public, or oreet~ ~n ~eethotically offen~ve sit~ open to publio 1~. FIECFIEATION: existing m~ro~t~onal opportunities? ~0. CULTURAL R£$OHFIC~$: prehistoric or historic archaeclogical sito? b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects [~ I~ I~ I~ to a prehistoric or historic building or structure? c. Cause a physical change that would [~ [~1 [~l [~ [~1 offect tho uniquo ,thni¢ cultural valuos? le EARTH: The entire Ukiah Valley is situated within a seismically active region. Three (3) predominant active fault systems have been identified within Mendocino County: the San Andreas, the Healdsburg, and the Mayacama-Talmage, known as the 'Mayacama" fault. The Mayacama fault is located along the eastern Ukiah Valley escarpment near Rogina Heights and extends northwesterly through the Ukiah Valley. According to resoume material maintained by the Ukiah Planning Department, the estimated maximum credible earthquake on this fault would be approximately 7.4 magnitude on the richter scale. The project area is relatively level, and is underlain by a variety of soil types. There are no unique geologic or physical features, and no known areas of severe soil instability. a, Impacts: It is not anticipated that any of the implementation actions contained in the Downtown Implementation Program would have a significant effect on the geologic or soil conditions within the area. The potential future projects involving the acquisition of land and the construction of parking facilities, particularly a multi-level parking garage, could have significant impacts on soils, and could expose people or property to geologic hazards. However, these potential impacts would be evaluated in the environmental documents associated with those individual projects. b. Mitiqation: No mitigations measures recommended. 1 AIR: The concentration of a pollutant in the atmosphere depends on the amount of pollutant emitted and the atmosphere's ability to transport and dilute the pollutant. The major determinants of transport and dilution are wind, atmospheric stability, terrain, and, for photochemical pollutants, sunshine. The project site is within the jurisdiction of the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District (AQMD). With two (2) exceptions, air quality within this district is good. District study conducted in 1980- 1986 and 1988 discovered potential problems/hazards associated with two (2) pollutants - small particulates (PM-10) and ozone. Small particulates are respiratory particulates which increase the risk of chronic respiratory disease. They are generated by construction activities, agricultural operations, wood sloves and fireplaces, and vehicular traffic. The Ukiah Valley has been a non-attainment area for State PM-10 since 1986. Most of the exceedances of the state standard occur during the winter months when there is an increased use of woodburning stoves and fireplaces. The more serious air quality problem/hazard involves ozone pollution. Ozone is not directly emitted from vehicles or other sources, but forms in the atmosphere-through a complex series of photochemical reactions. High levels pose serious health problems such as eye irritation and respiratory illness. b, Impacts: While it could be argued that the project would increase the use of the automobile by enhancing existing, and potentially developing new parking facilities within the downtown, the potential impact is off-set by the project's strong emphasis on promoting bicycle and pedestrian access to the downtown. In addition, the program includes a component to initiate a public mass transportation project with the Mendocino Transit Authority. The initial implementation actions of the program involve 'reshuffling" existing parking spaces, rather than constructing new ones. New parking facilities are considered a "last resort" that would be avoided in favor of increased public transportation into the downtown, as well as enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would promote alternative means for accessing and circulating within the area. The future design and actual construction of any parking facilities will be subject to individual environmental review. Staff is able to conclude that the project would not result in a deterioration of air quality in the Ukiah Valley, because it strongly promotes and incorporates alternative transportation concepts. Miff_clarion: No mitigation measures recommended. 1 WATER: Gibson Creek flows east to west through the northern portion of the project area. This tributary to the Russian River has been restricted by development, and in some areas, enough alluvium has been deposited to reduce its natural capacity. Resource material maintained by the City Planning Department reveals that as a result, localized minor flooding can occur along this creek. Impacts: In terms of flooding, the project will not have a significant adverse effect, except for the potential future construction of parking facilities. These potential impacts were evaluated, and mitigation measures recommended in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Ukiah Redevelopment Plan in 1989. If, in the future, it is determined that new parking facilities are needed, and the facilities discussed in the 1989 EIR are designed and proposed for construction, the required mitigation measures shall be imposed. However, if different facilities are proposed, or if it is determined that the previous EIR is outdated, new environmental documentation will need to be prepared for the new projects. The revised analysis will also discuss potential water quality impacts associated with the runoff of storm water from parking facilities. b. Mitigation: No mitigation measures recommended. PLANT LIFE: Resources maintained by the City Planning Department reveal no known rare, threatened, or endangered plant species within the project area. The area does have a significant number of mature native and introduced tree species, as well as mature landscaping treatments. Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project will have a significant adverse impact upon plant life within the project area because no new construction would occur on vacant lands containing significant vegetation. b. Mitigations: No mitigation measures recommended. So ANIMAL LIFE: The project area is densely urban in character, and no known rare, endangered, or threatened animal species exist within its boundaries. The limited riparian corridor along Gibson Creek supports animal, reptile and bird populations, and the various trees throughout the planning area provide habitat values to a wide variety of birds, insects, and small animals. be Impacts: The primary components of the project will not adversely impact animal populations, because no intense construction is proposed, and the area is densely urbanized. However, the potential future construction of new parking facilities could result in the removal of trees. The 1989 EIR identified a total of fifteen (15) trees that could be impacted. If the future parking facilities are designed and proposed for construction, the mitigation measures contained in the 1989 certified EIR shall be imposed. Altematively, if the specific projects differ, or if it is determined that the EIR is outdated, additional environmental documentation shall be required. Mitigation: No mitigation measures recommended. Sm NOISE: The entire project area is considered 'noisy' because of its dense urban character. However, the small clusters of residential land uses can be considered noise sensitive areas. Impacts: The primary components of the project will not significantly increase noise levels within the project area, because no immediate construction is proposed, and automobile traffic will not increase significantly. However, the potential future construction of new parking facilities could increase noise to a significant level. The 1989 EIR suggested appropriate mitigation measures to off-set the noise associated with construction activities. If in the future, new parking facilities are proposed, the 1989 EIR mitigation measures shall be imposed, or new environmental review for the individual projects shall be conducted. b. Miti~lation: No mitigation measures recommended. a LIGHT AND GLARE: The proposed improvements to existing parking facilities includes the installation of security lighting fixtures. Potential future parking facilities would be similarly illuminated. Impacts: It is not anticipated that the proposed parking facility lighting will produce significant amounts of light and glare because it will be Iow intensity and decorative, and is intended to enhance pedestrian walkways within the facilities. b. Miti_qation: No mitigation measures recommended. am LAND USE: The project represents an implementation program for one (1) component of the adopted Ukiah Downtown Revitalization Master Plan, therefore it is consistent with the planned land use for the area. The proposed Zoning Code amendments that would relax parking reqtlirements could result in an increase in new development and additions to existing buildings that could not have been proposed in the past. Based upon a field review of the project area and a review of resource materials maintained by the Planning Department, it is estimated that approximately 33,500 square feet of vacant land exists that could be developed more intensely than before as a result of the project. However, the increase in building intensity resulting from a reduction in required parking tacility development is not deemed significant in terms of potential environmental impacts, because the area is already urbanized and the potential increased square footage would not exceed 10,000 square feet because of parking facility and landscaping requirements. be Impacts: Based upon a review of the vacant lands within the planning area, and the resource material maintained by the planning Department, it is concluded that the proposed project would not have a significant adverse impact on the planned land use in the area, and would not have significant cumulative effects on the area's environmental setting. Miff_clarion: No mitigation measures recommended. gm NATURAL RESOURCES: The project consists of a implementation program that seeks to improve parking in the downtown area. No specific construction projects are proposed. Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project will increase the use on any natural resources, because no immediate construction is proposed. Any future construction would use common natural resource materials abundantly available in the area. b. Mitigation: No mitigation measures recommended. 10. RISK OF UPSET: There are no unusual or unique sources of hazardous or explosive substances within the project area. Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project will result in an increased risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances, because no significant concentrations of hazardous chemicals, radiation, etc. exist within the project area, and no specific construction is proposed. b. Mitigation: No mitigation measures recommended. 11. POPULATION: The current City population is approximately 15,000 people. The actual population within the planning area is obviously less and predominantly transient, because of the commercial, retail, and business related land uses. Impacts: The project will not alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate in the area, because no specific construction is proposed, and no displacement of existing housing or other structures will result from implementation of the project. b. Miti.qation: No mitigation measures recommended. 12. HOUSING: The downtown area is predominantly developed with commercial services, retail, offices, and other business/commercial land uses and structures. Some enclaves of residential land uses are present along the eastern edge of the project area. Impacts: The project will not have an adverse impact upon existing housing resources, and will not create a demand for new housing, because no specific construction is proposed, no housing developments are proposed for demolition, and no new industry or major job creating developments would result the project. b. Mitigation: No mitigation measures recommended. 13. TRANSPORTATION: Traffic circulation patterns within the project area are well defined, and adequately serve the existing commercial land uses. Public parking facilities are generally, adequate, but the improvements proposed in the project plan would improve the overall parking opportunities throughout the a. rea. bi Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project will result in a significant number of new vehicular movements or adversely alter current traffic patterns, because there will not be a substantial increase in new parking facilities, and alternative modes of transportation will be encouraged and accommodated. Impacts to parking facilities would be beneficial, because parking would be better organized, and more spaces would be available to the retail shopper. Mitiqation: No mitigation measures recommended. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES: City public services are widely available within the project area. a, Impacts: The project will not have a significant adverse impact upon the capacity or delivery of public services, because no specific construction is proposed that would require substantial amounts of electricity, water, police or fire protection, ambulance service, road maintenance, or any other municipal service. b. Mitiqation: No mitigation measures recommended. 15. ENERGY: Standard urban type energy resources are available within the project a~:ea. Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project will require substantial amounts of energy resources, nor would it cause in increase in the demand upon existing sources of energy, because no specific construction is proposed. b. Mitiwation: No mitigation measures recommended. 16. UTILITIES: Public utilities are readily available throughout the project area. am !mpacts: The only component of the project that would involve the use or extension of utilities is the installation of Iow intensity security lighting within existing parking facilities, if new parking facilities are constructed in the future, they similarly would be designed to have security lighting. However, this represents minor usage of existing electrical facilities, and does not constitute a significant adverse impact. b. Miti_qation: No mitigation measures recommended. 17. HUMAN HEALTH: The downtown area is generally a clean and healthful environment devoid of human health hazards. ao !mpacts: The proposed project will not create any health hazards, or expose people to potential health hazards, because no specific construction is proposed, no obvious or significant be health hazards exist in the area, and no dangerous or hazardous materials would be introduced into the area. Miti_qation: No mitigation measures recommended. 18. AESTHETICS: The aesthetics of the project area are characterized by common small city urban forms. However, in recent years, the downtown area has experienced a revitalization that.has enhanced the visual qualities of the area. a, Impacts: It is not anticipated that the proposed parking improvement program will result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, nor will it detract from the existing visual quality of the area. Any future construction of parking facilities would be subject to independent environmental review. b. Mitiqation: No mitigation measures recommended. 19. RECREATION: The City has a wide variety of both active and passive recreational facilities. There are no City owned parks or recreational facilities within the project area. Impacts: The project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the quantity or quality of local recreational facilities or opportunities, because none exist within the project area, and no component of the Downtown Parking Improvement Program will effect off-site City recreational facilities. b. Miti_qation: No mitigation measures recommended. 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Planning Department resources reveal that while there are no known prehistoric archaeological sites within the project area, there are a number of historic buildings. Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project will have a significant impact upon the historic structures within the project area because no actual construction is proposed. If in the future, new parking facilities are proposed for construction, separate environmental review of those projects would evaluate their potential impact upon historic resources. b. Miti_qation: No mitigation measures recommended. 21. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL CUMULATIVE IMPACTS: It is not anticipated that the project will have adverse cumulative impacts on the environmental setting of the project area, because no actual construction is proposed, the components of the program are oriented towards improving and reorganizing existing facilities, and the program seeks to encourage and enhance altemative transportation opportunities. 22. CONCLUSIONS: After careful review and analysis, staff is able to conclude that the proposed Downtown Parking Improvement Program will not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment because no actual construction is proposed, and the improvements are minor and oriented towards enha. ncing existing parking and encouraging alternative transportation. 23. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal species, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? YES [~ NO bw Short Term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environments one which occurs in a relatively, brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future). YES [~ NO Cumulative: Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is significant). YES [~ NO dl Substantially Adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? YES [~ .o 24. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described within the initial study have will be incorporated into the design of the project or required by the City of Ukiah. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT shall be required. Signat Planning Director Title Robert Sawyer Print Name 25, INFORMATION SOURCES: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) City of Ukiah General Plan, 1982. Ukiah Downtown Revitalization Master Plan EIR and Supplemental EIR, 1989. U.S.G.S. Topographic Map, Ukiah Quadrangle, 1975. Discussions with the State Department of Fish and Game, October, 1994. Ukiah Downtown Revitalization Master Plan. Wal-Mart Draft and Final EIR, 1992. Ukiah Amhitectural and Historic Resoumes Inventory Report. DAVID FAULKNER Air Pollution Control Officer PHILIP W. TOWLE Air Pollution Control Inspector December 14, 1994 Planning Commission City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 COUNTY OF MENDOCINO AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COURTHOUSE UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 9§482 RECEIVED DEC 1 199 OF IIKIAH PLANNING DEPT. Attachment 5 OFFICE LOCATION: 306 E,,st Gobbi Street Ukleh, California (707) 463-4354 SUBJECT: Amendments to the zoning code affecting parking requirements, Dear Commissioners- The Air District supports proposed staff changes to the parking code that will increase opportunities for bicycle parking and avoid creating unnecessary parking spaces. The three changes proposed by staff will reduce overall costs to businesses in the downtown, and help to keep this area viable. Reducing excessive parking requirements helps to create a pedestrian friendly shopping area by reducing, over time, the total paved area. This helps keep the area cooler in summer, and allows businesses to be closer together, a key factor for pedestrians. The District also supports staff's plan to locate employee parking in lots on the periphery of the area. This plan may benefit air quality because fewer employees will move their cars between spaces during the day, thus avoiding cold start emissions. However, we recommend that the final parking plan do more to encourage ridesharing. According to the latest census data, about 10% of commuters walk or bicycle to work, 12% carpooled, a few percentage used other means such as transit, but 76 % drove alone. Air quality agencies have sponsored a considerable amount of research in the past few years about the possible effectiveness of using' parking and road pricing to reduce auto emissions. The evidence shows that providing free parking is a very powerful incentive to drive alone. For instance, at the Warner Center, a suburban employment site (with no transit service), charging a $30/month parking fee in formerly free spaces increased Average Vehicle Occupancy from 1.08 to 1.55 while decreasing single occupant vehicles by 46 %. In another case, (Commuter Computer in Los Angeles), eliminating free parking and charging the market rate ($50), decreased solo driving by 83 %. There are many other examples available that show the same trend. Prof. Martin Wachs of UCLA points out that, "Free parking is not, however free in any real sense of the word. A 320 square foot space in a surface lot, financed over a 30-year period at a 10% interest rate (or alternatively, assessed an annual land rent), would cost $20 to $25 per · . ! Ukiah Planning Commission 12/14/94 page 2 month (including costs of pavement, striping, maintenance, etc.) at land prices of only. $5.00 per square foot." According to staff, parking spaces in Ukiah are worth about $30 per square foot ($10,000/space), hence the true rent value of a parking space in Downtown is about $120 to $150 per month. One can see that current "free parking" is a very strong subsidy to the single occupant vehicle, and provides little incentive to rideshare or use alternative transportation, (which do not receive a similar subsidy). Single occupant vehicles represent the greatest source of ozone precursors in the Ukiah Valley, and cause most peak-hour congestion problems. Commute distances have increased over the past decade, with weighted average commute trip lengths growing by about 12% (from 15.8 miles to 17.7 miles). In general, people are unwilling to carpool if they live less than 10 miles from work. As can be seen from the attached graph, about 50% of all commuters live more than 10 minutes from work, but only 12% now carpool. Hence, a large number of potential carpoolers exist. The key to increasing ridesharing is to use a combination of market-based measures (parking pricing) and incentives (rideshare matching, preferential parking, employer support). Recommendation Request staff to: 1. Develop a plan to provide preferred parking for carpoolers as part of an integrated transportation management plan for the City. 2. Develop an estimate of probable parking revenue, and show how this could be used to increase transit service in the Downtown. 3. Develop a program for increasing parking prices (over three to five years) to levels closer to their true market value. 4. Develop a rideshare matching program and other employer-based incentives (e.g., on-site bus pass sales). Local air quality will benefit from these changes. The District believes that a significant ridesharing increase among downtown employees will improve peak-hour congestion on City streets, and would obviate many short trips now made at 'lunch by single occupant vehicles. Reducing overall traffic volumes will also help make Downtown more friendly to cyclists and pedestrians, with those trip modes increasing as a result. Therefore, we strongly urge you to support a parking plan that emphasizes ridesharing to reduce parking demand and protect air quality. Sincerely, ~-~ David Morrow Air Quality Planner d..mendo.con.ukiah.plcompk.doc · ILl LLi O '066 I. '086 I. 'SFISN::::IO '~lOI::II"'IOS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB~i~OO 77~ ~0 % AGENDA SUMMARY DATE: December 6, 1995 REPORT SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE MINOR SUBDIVISION MAP APPLICATION NO. 95-38 (LOHR) SUMMARY: On October 25, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Minor Subdivision Map No. 95-38, as filed by James P. Lohr and Kathy Brigham, subject to (This PROJECT SUMMARY is continued on the next page.) RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council deny the applicant's appeal, and uphold the actions of Planning Commission. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: 1. Approve the appeal and require that Condition No. 5 be modified to require that the developer of the site provide only sixty feet of the public street improvements outlined in the condition. Appropriation requested: N/A Citizen advised: Legal Notice posted and advertised Requested by: James P. Lohr and Kathy Brigham Prepared by: Dave Lohse, Associate Planner Coordinated with: Bob Sawyer, Planning Director, and Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Request for Appeal of Planning Commission action to City Council. 2. Letter of Support for Appeal by Philip Ashiku. 3. City Council Policy Resolution No. 5 4. Minutes of Planning Commission meeting on 10/25/95, including Findings & Conditions of Approval. 5. Planning Report to Planning Commission for appeal of City Engineer' decision, including Letter of Appeal, Planning Report & Minutes for City Engineer Hearing. APPROVED: ~-'~ ~'"' . ,~t~;~~ ~~n age r Ca'hdace Horsley, City PROJECT SUMMARY (continued): the seventeen Conditions of Approval listed on Pages 11-13 of the attached Minutes from the October 25, 1995, meeting of the Planning Commission. The Commission's review of this project was required in response to an appeal by one of the applicants, Mr. James Lohr, of the earlier approval of the project by the City Engineer at a public hearing on October 6, 1995. The approval of this project, which allowed the division of the 0.78 acre parcel into three lots, was subject to twenty Conditions of Approval (see attached Minutes for City Engineer Meeting on 10/6/95). Mr. Lohr's appeal of the Conditions of Approval required by the City Engineer referred specifically to Condition No. 5, which requires that specific improvements be constructed by the applicant or developer of the project site along unimproved portions of Cypress Avenue and Pine Street that are dedicated to the City of Ukiah. Specifically, the condition states that: . Street improvements consisting of curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway aprons, street pavement and base, and the adjustment of the existing manhole and water valves to grade shall be constructed along the frontage on Cypress Avenue and Pine Street. The street improvement shall be designed by a Civil Engineer and submitted on an Improvement Plan (plan and profile) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The curb and gutter alignment shall be circular along the frontage which shall join existing curb and gutter. The applicant shall provide for and construct a common driveway approach for the proposed twenty-foot wide private road and the existing driveway to the east of the project site. Mr. Lohr indicated in his appeal to the Planning Commission that he is willing to accept the responsibility for providing the required improvements along the sixty-foot long portion of unimproved roadway that directly fronts his property. He also expressed his opinion that the requirement to provide improvements along the other forty-foot long section that does not directly front his property is an unfair condition since it is an off-site improvement and would provide improvements for an adjacent property owner. The Planning Department and the City Engineer recommended that Mr. Lohr's appeal be denied by the Planning Commission, due, primarily, to the opinion that the required public street improvements are consistent with City Council Policy Resolution No. 5 (attached). The City Engineer also indicated that the construction of improvements along the entire frontage are necessary to ensure that the most efficient turning radius for this corner is completed, and to eliminate a ponding problem caused by the lack of curb and gutter along the existing roadway. The Planning Commission reviewed the appeal request and voted to deny the appeal, Cathy McKay, Clerk Ukiah City Council 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 November 2, 1995 1022 W. Standley St. Ukiah, CA 95482 re: Minor Subdivision Map Application No. 95-38 Dear Ms. McKay: We are the applicants for the above-referenced subdivision approval. On October 25, 1995, the matter came before the Ukiah Planning Commission and that body approved a staff-imposed condition that we perform off site improvements in order to obtain approval of our application (Condition No. 4). We wish to, and do hereby, appeal this decision to the Ukiah City Council. We object to Condition No. 4 because it requires us to spend several thousand dollars installing sidewalk and gutter on someone else's property. There is ilo good reason why the corner must be rounded. Our planned improvements would correct the drainage and adequately address any other concerns. We do not believe the City has the authority to require these off site improvements as a condition of this minor subdivision. Please place this matter on agenda for the next available meeting. If your require any further information, please call us at 462- 5444. P.S. For staff's information, please note that Condition No. 16 requires that Nos. 5, 15, and 18 be shown on the final parcel map. There is no Condition No. 18. RECE VEP N OV 2 7 1995 CITY OF UKIAI! Novemb~"~?[~995 Fred Schneiter, Mayor City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 9548,~/' ~// Honorable Mayo~r and Members of the City Council: CITY (,'Lf!R'~ DEPARTMENT ,_.FR, .. I ask that you concur that the City's special condition 5 requiring offsite road improvements in connection with a 3 parcel tentative map is excessive, and thereby Uphbld the appeal of the Planning Commission's October 25 decision filed by Jim Lohr. The condition violates personal property rights, in that it is inconsistent with the City code, is not supported by adopted City facility planning, and fails to demonstrate that the need is roughly proportional to tile development impact. As background, the Planning Commission on October 25, 1995 upheld the City Engineer's decision to approve the tentative map witil special condition 5 requiring the construction of offsite improvements (i.e., improved encroachment, sidewalk, curb and gutters) along the neighboring'60+ feet of road frontage at Pine and Cypress Streets. (The frontage adjacent to the subject property is about 40 feet wide.) In my judgment, the evidence in the record does not support this exaction. Condition 5 is contrary to the City Code requirement that road improvements must be constructed along the public road frontage of the property subject to development. There is no requirement for offsite improvements applicable to th~s case. The City Engineer stated that condition 5 advances the City's desire to improve health and safety via facility improvements throughout the City. However, the required offsite improvements are not identified as deficiencies in the City's facility plans. I believe this is a condition of convenience, it is arbitrary and not founded in law or facility planning, and no degradation to public health or safety will result from the elimination of the offsite condition. Last, but most bothersome, the requirement for offsite improvements ignores the City's obligation, vis-a-vis Dolan v. City of Tigard, a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court takings case. The City has not made an individualized determination as to how the development creates the need for offsite public improvements. This determination is the basis for demonstrating that the condition is roughly proportional to the impact caused and does not impose an excessive financial burden compared to the property's profit potential. Sincerely, Phillip Ashiku Chairman, Ukiah Planning Commission POLICY RESOLUTION NO. 5 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH REQUIRING STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF UKIAH WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain street i improvements particularly curb, gutter and sidewalk are necessary to the public convenience and to the welfare of the citizens of i°, 9 il Ukiah and construction of these improvements are the responsibil- J0 ii ity of the property owner. ]] il WHEREAS, the appropriate time for construction of such !; ]2 :~ improvements is when an existing unimproved lot is dev'eloped or a 33 !i division of property is approved or other construction occurs '~4 !: WHEREAS, the City Engineer is charged with the determination 15 :i of appropriate street improvement standards and approval on minor :. i'. subdivisions and the Building Official issues building and site ,; 17 i! improvement permits, pursuant to City codes and regulations. ,, 18 'i NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that street frontage ]9 i and other reiated improvements as determined by the City Engineer !: shall be required to be constructed or installed as a condition of .. 2I approval for: a) minor divisions of property, prior tO the recording of Parcel Maps for such divisions; b) building permits fo~ new residence or main resi'dential/ commercial structure on a parcel upon which the improve- ments do not exist; 22 23 26 27 25 c) building permits where the permit value is equal to 0r greater than ']/3 of the value of the existing structure. ; -- i 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of. September, 1981, by the following roll call vote' AYES' Councilmembers Hickey, Feibusch, Snyder, Riley, Myers ,qOES' None ABSENT- None ATTEST s/Charles G. Myers Mayor s/Hattie Tillotson City C1 erk COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Nolle. APPEAL PROCESS Chairman Ashiku read the Appeal Process to the audience. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ae Appeal of the City Engineer's decision to approve Tentative Minor Subdivision No. 95-38, as filed by James P. Lohr and Kathy Brigham, to allow the division of a 0.78 acre parcel of record into three parcels of record of 15,340 square feet, 12,200 square feet and 12,160 square feet, respectively, on property located in the R-l, Single Family Residential Zoning District, at 400 Cypress Avenue, Assessor Parcel Nos. 002-111-31. Associate Planner Dave Lohse prefaced his report with several modifications to the proposed Conditions. He advised the Commission to strike Condition Nos. 1, 16, and 17, and to note the revisions to Condition No. 6. He further advised that on October 6 of this year, the City Engineer conditionally approved MS #95-38 to allow the division of a 0.78 acre parcel located on Cypress Avenue into 3 separate parcels. This approval was based on Findings, and subject to 19 Conditions of Approval, including Standard Conditions 1-24. , , The applicant for this project, Mr. James Lohr, indicated at the CE hearing that he opposed Special Condition No. 5, and that he would appeal this condition if approved as part of the project. Therefore, Mr. Lohr is the Appellant in this matter. Special Condition No. 5 requires the owner of the project site to complete the following improvements prior to approval of the Parcel Map for the project, or to provide bonding for the completion of the improvements; the improvements are deferred until the application of a building permit. Street improvements consisting of curb and _cutter. sidewalk, driveway aprons, street pavement and base. and the adjustment of the existing manhole and water valves to grade shall be constructed along the frontage on Cypress Avenue and Pine Street. The street improvements shall be designed by a Civil Engineer and submitted on an Improvement Plan (plan and profile) for review and approval by the City_ Engineer, The curb and _gutter alignment shall be circular along the frontage which shall join existing MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 October 25, 1995 curb and gutter. The applicant shall provide for and construct a common driveway approach for the proposed twenty-foot wide private road and the existing driveway to the east of the project site. Cypress Avenue and Pine Street actually intersect at a point 90 feet south of Mr. Lohr's property, but Cypress runs north from this intersection and tums to the west on a radius that is between 10 to 65 feet south of the site. The existing road in this area is bounded on its south and southwest portion of the turn by public improvements, including curb and gutter, but is unimproved along the northeast frontage. · Special Condition No. 5 effectively requires that Mr. Lohr, or future owners, provide improvements along the unimproved section of Cypress Avenue, where it meets Pine Street. These improvements would connect curb and gutter from an existing terminus near the southeast corner of the site with an existing terminus at the point Cypress intersects with Pine. Due to the location and curvilinear design favored by the City Engineer, the length of these improvements would be approximately 101 feet long, and would run across a portion of land currently in City ownership. This is actually the right of way which abuts privately owned parcels. The initial design of the frontage improvement, as done by City Engineering staff, would have a radius designed to reflect the radius of the opposite corner (to the southwest). This curvilinear design is considered to be the most practical and safest design for vehicles using both Pine Street and Cypress Avenue. Mr. Lohr has indicated that he should be responsible for only a portion of the improvements since his property has only 60 feet of frontage and the required improvements would be approximately 41 feet longer. It is also Mr. Lohr's contention that. these improvements serve the Cook property, which is located to the southeast of his site, and that either the' Cooks or the City should be responsible for the improvements. In response, the City Engineer has indicated that: * the entire unimproved portion of Cypress Avenue between the existing street improvements has been determined to be frontage for the project site, since this portion is fronted by the 60 foot wide frontage for proposed Lot 1. * the improvement of the entire unimproved portion is necessary to provide safe and efficient access to the project site, particularly with the proposed radius, which is designed to reflect the curve of the street on its southwest side. * the improvements are necessary to eliminate drainage and ponding problems in this unimproved area, and to effectively move surface water drainage from the site into public streets. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 October 25, 1995 * the requirements for improvements is consistent with the requirements outlined in City Council Policy Resolution No. 5, which invests the City Engineer 'with the authority and responsibility of determining "appropriate street improvement standards" RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department concurs with the Ci_ty Engineer. and recommends that the proposed Appeal be denied, based on the Findings listed on Page 3 of the Planning Report. Planning Director Robert Sawyer introduced City Engineer Rick Kennedy as being present to answer any questions that may arise. Commissioner Pruden asked what the current zoning was at that location. Mr. Lohse responded that it was currently R-l, single family. Commissioner Pruden asked if that was changed in the proposed General Plan to Medium Density, which in the future could possibly become an R-2 designation. Mr. Lohse replied that was correct. .. , Commissioner Baker stated she lives in this neighborhood, and does not see how this project and the requested improvements create any hazard. She disagrees with staff's interpretation of the resolution. She does concur there is a hazard, but it has been there for a long time. The hazard exists because the City has not maintained the road edge on the property that is their responsibility. The creation of three single family homes does not create an additional hazard. She does not think the applicants should have to pay for improving this property and this hazard when it has nothing to do with their development. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 7:14 p.m. Carol Connerton, 906 North Oak, stated her property abuts the proposed project, and asked when the proper time would be to speak regarding the trees along the creek. Chairman Ashiku replied this matter could be addressed at the time development begins on that site. Jim Lohr, applicant, 1022 West Standley, thanked staff for deleting Condition Nos. 16 and 17. He stated he wants to pay for his fair share of frontage improvements, but does not want to improve his neighbor's property. He felt Commissioner Baker addressed the situation quite well. Commissioner Pruden asked the applicant if he owned all three lots. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 October 25, 1995 Mr. Lohr replied he owns one lot which he is proposing to divide into three lots. Commissioner Pruden asked about the name designation "Zimmerman" shown on the map. Mr. Lohr replied that was a previous owner. Commissioner Baker asked the applicant, if he had any problem with the Conditions regarding the deferred improvements, and the fire hydrant. Mr. Lohr replied he did not. Commissioner Baker asked the applicant how many times he saw a car speeding down Pine Street and off the edge of the pavement during the time he was a resident in the neighborhood. Mr. Lohr replied he was uncertain of the number of times he observed the situation, but was certain that it did occur. It has been a bad corner for years. Commissioner Larson asked the applicant if he had any thoughts regarding how the frontage improvements would be completed if the Planning Commission determined the property would be unsafe to develop without the improvements at that corner. Mr. Lohr replied he thought the people who own the frontage should pay their fair share. Commissioner Larson stated that according to City resolution, the City cannot require property owners to pay for improvements that are not improving their property. , o Discussion followed relative to how the improvements could be accomplished, with the notation that developers are frequently required to make off-site improvements of traffic circulation for development of property. The applicant stated he has not contacted the other property owners regarding what the City is requiring of him regarding all of the improvements. Jeff Trouette, 807 Maple Avenue, stated he sees this as a case on the City's part as "laying in wait." There is a street improvement that needs to be done regardless of the curb and gutter work. The asphalt pavement has deteriorated and the drainage has been a problem for many years. He feels in the past the City has taken a role where they have been hot and cold regarding street improvements, and there are projects around town that have been left unfinished because of the lack of enforcement. The dirt area on the project site has been let go because the City owns it; they needs to participate by providing financial assistance for maintenance and repair. The negligence of the City should not delay the subdivision development. He also asked if the Planning Commission would be involved in any of the building process if the lots were created and the parcels did not require any variances or use permits. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5 October 25, 1995 Mr. Sawyer replied it would not. That assumes the development occurs under current zoning, and not that proposed under the new General Plan. Site development permits are not required for single family development, and unless the applicant needed a variance requiring a discretionary review by this body, there would be no review beyond that required for a building permit. Mr. Lohr stated, for clarification, that he is very much interested in paving the street. The issue is the curb and gutter along the frontage. Antonio Androtti, 405 Cypress Avenue, expressed confirmation of Commissioner Baker's comments. He stated that cars go sliding into the gravel there several times a year, and that it is a dangerous problem area that is not marked clearly. He also expressed concern regarding the proposed zoning for a more intensified use of the property as opposed to the expressed intended uses of Mr. Lohr, and asked that staff address the potential buildout of the property. One of his primary concerns is that the property could be developed into 5 lots, and he is grateful that Mr. Lohr is developing only 3 lots. He also expressed concern about the trees, and asked if those issues will be addressed at any time during the building process. Mr. Sawyer stated that unless there is a discretionary action such as a site development or variance permit, those issues will not be addres, sed because there is not a current ordinance at this time that pertains to the preservation of those trees. Matters concerning development near the creek requiring a stream bed alteration agreement must go to California Fish and Game. If this subdivision is approved and there are no discretionary actions involved, the matter will never come to the Planning Commission; there will be no opportunity to place a condition of approval relating to the trees. By law, the building permit review process is ministerial in nature, and no body has an opportunity to review such issues. Chairman Ashiku asked if a discretionary action was required if the map was amended to change the density. Mr. Sawyer responded in the negative. The applicant can build under the existing General Plan without a discretionary review. If the new General Plan is adopted as proposed, the zoning will become R-2, Medium Density Residential, and depending upon their development, a site development permit might be required. Chairman Ashiku confirmed Mr. Androtti's concerns regarding density increase on the basis of the map. Mr. Sawyer responded the proper context for that discussion is the deliberation surrounding the General Plan. He suggested Mr. Androtti address the issue to him by letter. Commissioner Baker indicated that after the adoption of the General Plan, there will be public hearings regarding zoning. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6 October 25, 1995 Mr. Sawyer stated the property owners will be notified of any zoning that will change as a result of the adoption of the new General Plan. Mr. Androtti stated that, unfortunately, this was a situation where there are a number of heritage trees on the creek bank and stream bed which he considers an important resource. Although he agreed that individuals have a right to develop their property as they wish, he expressed his frustration at there being no process by which this issue could be addressed. Kathy Brigham, property owner, gave assurance that they had no intention of cutting down the trees, except to prune them for safety reasons or if they were dead or dying. Mr. Trouette stated he and the applicants have an interest in the future plans of the property, and that they have no desire to or intention of cutting down the trees, covering their roots with dirt, or destroying the creek. The trees enhance the property; none of the individuals involved have a problem with current City policy regarding the trees. Mr. Androtti stated his intention was to demonstrate the concern that the trees are on the side slope of the creek, and their removal will create erosion. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:37 p.m. City Engineer Rick Kennedy stated he wished to revisit Commissioner Baker's comment regarding Policy Resolution No. 5. He called attention to the Provisions listed under the Resolved section of the Resolution, wherein it states that: street frontage and other related improvements, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be required to be constructed or installed as a condition of approval for a) minor subdivisions of property [parcel map]. He read the following section from the Subdivision Map Act as substantiation for his decision: Division 2. Subdivisions Chapter 1. General Provisions and Definitions Article 1. General Provisions 66411.1 Limitation on improvement requirements under a parcel map, provides for delay of improvement completion a) Notwithstanding Section 66428, whenever a local ordinance requires improvements for a division of land which is not a subdivision of five or more lots [parcel map], the regulations shall be limited to the dedication of rights-of-way, easements, and the construction of reasonable offsite and onsite improvements for the parcels being created. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 October 25, 1995 Mr. Kennedy further stated they are only asking that 41 additional feet be improved. This subdivision creates 3 lots. Assuming a min~imum lot width of 60 feet, and if these lots were fronting on a public road, there would be 180 feet. The City Engineer is seeking the correction of an unsatisfactory condition at this corner of Pine and Cypress. Mr. Lohr is correct; the curb and gutter and sidewalk is the responsibility of the property owner. He is not aware of why the curb and gutter was terminated where it was on Mr. Cook's property. Mr. Cook's property is a corner lot. The frontage is improved, but not the sideyard. The sideyard or street that abuts his sideyard does not act like a sideyard; there is a fence and vines there, creating an odd-shaped public right-of-way. The City Engineer feels the request for the additional 41 feet is a reasonable offsite improvement requirement for an unsatisfactory condition. Drainage on the north side of Cypress goes to the east, tries to make it around the corner, goes south on Pine and then east again. The improvement will finish the curb and gutter and enhance the drainage. He agrees with Mrs. Connerton's letter that the area is a mudhole. Commissioner Baker commented it is a mudhole because the pavement edge has fallen apart and a ditch has been created. The Cooks are quite satisfied with not having a sidewalk there. The creation of a sidewalk would necessitate the removal of the fence and vines, which are an effective sight and sound barrier. · . Mr. Kennedy responded by saying the reason why the pavement edge is breaking is because there is no lateral support for the pavement edge; curb and gutter provide the necessary support. Chairman Ashiku asked if the City had identified this area for improvement previous to this map request. Mr. Kennedy replied the entire City is in need of improvements; the condition of the streets is deteriorating. The Public Works Department is putting together a pavement management system, which will identify the street rehabilitation needs. All of the fieldwork for this has been done. The City does not have enough money to repair all of the streets. This specific area has not been designated for any improvements. Commissioner Pruden stated she understands the problem and totally agrees that this area needs a curb and gutter. The only question is who is going to pay for it. Her opinion is that the 41 feet is not a financially onerous condition considering the improvement in pedestrian safety in the area. It is difficult to retrofit in older neighborhoods, since long time residents get accustomed to the conditions, and she understands why the Cooks show no interest. She perhaps would feel differently if this was just a single family lot, but there are going to be 3 lots providing a significant financial potential, and great improvement for the neighborhood for the cost of a few extra feet of paving. She stated she was well aware of the City's economic conditions and lack of money for street improvement, and sees no alternative but to ask the developer to pay for paving an additional 41 feet for the curb and gutter. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8 October 25, 1995 Commissioner Smith concurred with Commissioner Pruden's analysis of the issue. The cost of the additional forty one feet compared to the financial incentive of the 3 lot split would seem to be minimal. He agreed with Mr. Kennedy's statements. Chairman Ashiku asked how much money they were actually talking about for the additional improvements. Mr. Kennedy responded the developer will pay half of what the City would have to pay. The City is currently paying approximately $16 a foot for curb and gutter and $5 per square foot for sidewalk. A private owner can get a better price by hiring a contractor who is not required to pay the prevailing wage. Commissioner Larson asked if he was correct in assuming that none of these improvements had , to be made until the building permits are applied for. Mr. Kennedy replied that was correct. Commissioner Larson inquired regarding the responsibility for payment for the improvements, and what percentage of payment would be required of the first person who applied for a building permit. Mr. Kennedy replied the first applicant would have to pay for the entire street frontage; the others would not have to pay. Commissioner Pruden commented that would be true unless the owner did an infrastructure improvement before the lots went on the market,l.which often happens in small subdivisions. Mr. Kennedy stated that was the developer's option; however, the City cannot require the improvements be done until the building permit is applied for. Commissioner Larson inquired whether there was any means by which the developer could place a lien on the adjacent properties for the improvements. He assumes the Cooks are not willing to pay. Commissioner Baker stated she could assure him they were not. Mr. Kennedy stated he had no discussion with the Cooks. This minor subdivision was submitted for the City Engineer's approval, and considering the situation, he felt it reasonable that this particular subdivision put in the balance of the improvements. Chairman Ashiku asked whether a benefit assessment could be leveled against a future buyer for the Cook's property should they decide to submit some type of improvement. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9 October 25, 1995 Mr. Kennedy replied only if the addition exceeds 1/3 of the value of the property. Chairman Ashiku stated he has a problem with this Condition because the City has failed to make a determination proportional to its responsibility related to the impact of the development and the condition. There is a shared City responsibility in improvements on that site. He cited a Supreme Court decision that stated it is the obligation of a city to make an individual determination with respect to the nature and extent of the relationship of the condition and the impact. He believes the impact is overstated in this case, and that is why he cannot support the Condition. Commissioner Baker asked the applicant what his estimate was of the cost of the constrUction of the sidewalk. Mr. Lohr replied approximately $3,000 to $4,000, although that figure was only an estimate. Commissioner Baker stated there is a safety problem at this corner, and nothing about this improvement addresses this issue. It is her belief that the required Condition enhances the danger, and encourages people to act more recklessly. She believes it necessary for the City to go out and look at what they need to do to take care of the safety problem that is created in the neighborhood by the City's neglect, and not ask property Qwners to pay for it. Asking people to pay for improvements is not a way to encourage the development of housing within the City. She cannot support Condition No. 5. ON A MOTION by Commissioner Pruden, seconded by Commissioner Smith, it was carried by the following roll call vote, to deny the appeal of Special Condition No. 5, based on the following Findings, rescind Conditions 1, 16, and 17 and apply the new wordage in Condition No. 6. Approval of Tentative Minor Subdivision Map No. 95-38, as filed by James P. Lohr and Kathy Brigham, shall be subject to the following modified Conditions: FINDINGS; The Planning Commission's denial of this appeal is based, in part, on the following Findings: o The City Engineer's requirement for public street improvements and their construction by the property owner/developer is consistent with the requirements of City Council Policy Resolution No. 5; and , The improvement of the parcel without the public street improvements required by the City Engineer would be detrimental to the health and safety of persons residing and working in the neighborhood and be harmful to the general welfare of the City because it would not allow the most efficient turning radius for Cypress Avenue and would allow continued ponding of drainage from the site in this area. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 10 October 25, 1995 CONDITIONS OF APPROYAL: The Conditions listed below have been required as part of the Planning Commission's approval of the proposed tentative minor subdivision project on October 25, and shall become effective on November 6, 1995, if no appeal of this action is submitted. The Conditions of Approval shall be made a permanent part of the project proposal, shall remain in force regardless of property ownership, and shall be implemented in order for the entitlement to remain valid: o A Parcel Map will be required pursuant to Local Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval with materials, fees and substantiating documents required by the City Engineer. . All taxes now due, or past due, shall be paid prior to the approval of the Parcel Map. o The Tentative Map will expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of its approval or conditional approval. , Street improvements consisting of curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway aprons, street pavement and base, and the adjustment of the existing manhole and water valves to grade shall be constructed along the frontage on Cypress Avenue and Pine Street. The street improvements shall be designed by a Civil Engineer and submitted on an Improvement Plan (plan and profile) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The curb and gutter alignment shall be circular along the frontage which shall join existing curb and gutter. The appl!qant shall provide for and construct a common driveway approach for the proposed twenty-foot wide private road and the existing driveway to the east of the project site. o A twenty-foot wide easement meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and located within the proposed 40 foot wide private access easement along the east side of proposed Lot 1 shall be dedicated to the City of Ukiah for public utility purposes. The west line of the utility easement shall coincide with the west line of the private access easement. , A twenty-foot wide easement meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and located along the southern property line of proposed Lot 2 and terminating at the eastern property line of proposed Lot 3 shall be dedicated to the City of Ukiah for public utility purposes. . The private road shall be designed and constructed to receive lot drainage and other historic surface drainage at the project site. Surface drainage collected by the MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 11 October 25, 1995 8, private road shall be discharged to the public street via a parkway drainage. The private road shall be located a minimum of fifteen feet from the eastern property line of the site unless it is determined by a certified arborist in a report submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval that the construction and maintenance of the road at a point closer than fifteen feet would not be detrimental to the continued health and survival of the existing trees located north of the road. . 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. The private road shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the requirements of Section 9251 (A-H) of the City of Ukiah's Municipal Code, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for any residemial structure(s) on proposed Lots 2 or 3. All residences constructed on the site that utilize the private road proposed for the project shall have addresses posted in the front of the residence or on the residence, and at the imersection of the private road and Cypress Avenue. The private road shall be poste~d with signs every twenty-five feet that indicate "FIRE LANE- NO PARKING'". No grading shall be allowed on the project site without the review and approval of a Grading Plan by the City Engineer. This Grading Plan shall restrict grading within twenty feet of the top of the bank for Orr Creek unless it is approved as an emergency measure by the City Engineer or a federal or state agency with jurisdiction in this area, and shall include erosion control measures for building pads, road construction or other development that the City Engineer determines would induce erosion on the site. Stockpiled soils and soils exposed by grading or other construction activities shall be watered regularly to ensure that dust resulting from the development of building pads, access roads, driveways, or other construction is contained on the site. The boundary of the 100-year floodplain, as it is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Panel No. 060186 0001 E (revised August 5, 1985), shall be shown on the Parcel Map and labeled as "AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING DURING 100-YEAR FLOOD EVENT". Vertical datum to verify areas subject to 100-year flood events is to be taken from benchmark RM3, as shown on the FIRM. Since the vertical datum used to establish elevations on the Tentative Parcel Map is not shown on the map, a civil engineer or land surveyor shall be required to provide verification or certification to the City Engineer that the datum on the FIRM and the Tentative Parcel Map are equivalent if the elevations on the MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 12 October 25, 1995 Tentative Parcel Map are utilized to establish flood boundaries. 15. 16. 17. All required improvements are deferred until a Building Permit is approved for the development of a residence or other structure on one of the parcels within the minor subdivision, pursuant to Section 66411.1 of the Subdivision Map Act. The measures listed in Special Conditions 5, 15, and 18 shall be shown in a Note on the Final Parcel Map and/or the Map Data Sheet for the Final Parcel Map. A fn'e hydrant shall be installed by the developer(s) of the site at a location subject to the review and approval of the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of any Building Permits for development of the site. Commissioner Larson asked if the appeal can be dismissed without prejudice. Discussion followed relative to the appeal without prejudice process. Commissioner Larson asked if the applicant can come back if this appeal is denied. Mr. Sawyer replied the applicant can appeal the Planning Commission decision to the City Council. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Larson, Pruden, Smith Commissioner Baker, Chairman Ashiku None None Chairman Ashiku declared his NO vote was made'with comment. He is of the opinion that the City should pay their fair share. He notified the applicant that the appeal was denied. RECESS: 7:55 p.m. RECONVENE: 8:05 p.m. Be Site Development Permit No. 95-39, as filed by Albertson's, Inc, to allow the construction of a truck well/loading dock facility and the realignment of existing parking on property located in the C-N (_Commercial Neighborhood) Zoning District, in the Pear Tree Shopping Center along the north side of Perkins Street, Assessor Parcel No. 002-200-29. Associate Planner Dave Lohse advised that on October 12, 1995 the Planning Department received a letter from Mr. Jeffrey Graden, Project Architect, requesting that this project be continued from the Planning Commission's hearing on October 25, 1995 to its hearing on December 13, 1995. The reason given for this request is the lack of a 'finalized lease agreement MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 13 October 25, 1995 DATE: CITY OF UKIAH PLANNING REPORT October 18, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: DATE: TO: FROM: City of Ukiah Planning Commission City of Ukiah Planning Department SUBJECT: Appeal of City Engineer's decision to approve Tentative Minor Subdivision Map (#95-38):Lohr APPELLANT: James P. Lohr PROJECT SUMMARY: The project consists of an appeal of Special Condition No. 5, which is required as a Condition of Approval for a Tentative Minor Subdivision Map (#95- 38). This tentative map was approved on October 6, 1995, by the City Engineer to allow the division of a 0.78 acre parcel into three parcels that would measure 15,340 square feet, 12,200 square feet and 12,160 square feet. The entire list of Conditions approved as part of the project are attached. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed site is located at 400 Cypress Avenue, directly north the intersection of Cypress Avenue with Pine Street (Assessor Parcel No. 002-111-31). DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Appeal on the grounds that Special Condition No. 5 is consistent with City Council Policy Resolution No. 5, and is necessary to eliminate a potentially unsafe road condition. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On October 18, 1995, the City Engineer approved a Tentative Minor Subdivision application (#95-38) to allow the division of a single parcel of record into three separate parcels. This approval was based on Findings recommended by the Planning Department and twenty Conditions of Approval. Included with these conditions is Special Condition No. 5, which requires the following: . Street improvements consisting of curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway aprons, street pavement and base, and the adjustment of the existing manhole and water valves to grade shall be constructed along the frontage on Cypress Avenue and Pine Street. The street improvements shall be designed by a Civil Engineer and submitted on an Improvement Plan (plan and profile) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The curb and gutter a~lignment shall be circular along the frontage which shall join existing curb and gutter. The applicant shall provide for and construct a common driveway approach for the proposed twenty-foot wide private road and the existing driveway to the east of the project site. This condition would require the developers of the project site to provide the improvements listed in the condition for the entire unpaved right-of-way along Cypress Avenue, which as required by the City Engineer, is to have a circular alignment per adopted City standards. The newly constructed improvements would eliminate an unimproved portion of Cypress Avenue frontage located directly south of the project site. The City Engineer has indicated that the preferred design for the improvements along this section of right-of-way would require the construction of a curved curb and gutter across the entire unimproved portion of the right-of-way, which would be approximately 101 feet long. Planning Department staff have attached a drawing of the preliminary design for these improvements that was prepared from information supplied by the Engineering Department staff. The appellant outlined his reasons for the appeal in a letter (attached) that was submitted to the City Engineer on October 6, 1995. In this letter, the appellant indicates that his objections to Special Condition No. 5 are based on his opinion that it requires the developers of the project site to construct "offsite improvements to other properties". The appellant suggests that a portion of these improvements be completed by a neighboring property owner or the City of Ukiah. STAFF ANALYSIS: The requirement for improvements along the unimproved portion of Cypress Avenue is based on the City Engineer's interpretation of the project's compliance with City Council Policy Resolution No. 5 (adopted 9/2/81). This resolution states that certain street improvements shall be installed if it is determined to be necessary to the public convenience and to the welfare of the citizens of Ukiah, and that the responsibility for these improvements shall be the responsibility of the property owner. The resolution also charges the City Engineer with the determination of appropriate street improvements and approval on minor subdivisions. The City Engineer has indicated to the applicant that the entire unimproved right-of-way has been determined to be a projection of the project site's frontage, which is approximately sixty feet long, and that the improvement of this area is necessary to provide safe and efficient access to the parcels that could be developed if this project is permitted. This determination is also based, in part, on the City Engineer's opinion that the improvement of the entire frontage is necessary as a part of this project to eliminate the potential safety hazards that could be generated by the partial completion of the curve. The partial completion of this frontage could confuse drivers using Cypress Avenue, whereas the full completion of improvements would permit a more efficient, curvilinear turning radius. Engineering staff has also indicated that the construction of the required improvements is necessary to complete drainage improvements in the area. This unimproved area is currently subject to ponding in wet periods of the year that is caused, in part, by drainage from the site. CONCLUSIONS: The requirement for public street improvements along the unimproved portion of Cypress Avenue is consistent with the requirements of City Council Resolution No. 5, and is necessary to eliminate a potential road hazard. FINDINGS: The Planning Department's recommendation for the denial of this appeal is based, in part, on the following findings: le The City Engineer's requirement for public street improvements and their construction by the property owner/developer is consistent with the requirements of City Council Policy Resolution No. 5, and . The improvement of the parcel without the public street improvements required by the City Engineer would be detrimental to the health and safety of persons residing and working in the neighborhood and be harmful to the general welfare of the City because it would not allow the most efficient turning radius for Cypress Avenue and the and would allow continued ponding of drainage from the site in this area. ATTACHMENTS: 1 2. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. . Location Map. Site Plan for Tentative Minor Subdivision Map. Letter of Appeal from Mr. James Lohr, dated 10/6/95. Conditions of Approval for approved Tentative Minor Subdivision Map. Preliminary Design for Street Improvements for 400 Cypress Avenue. City Council Policy Resolution No. 5. Planning Report prepared for City Engineer's Hearing on September 27, 1995. Letter from Carol Connerton expressing concerns with project. Project Review Committee Notes from September 18, 1995 meeting. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The following personnel, respectively, have prepared and reviewed this Planning Report. Charles Stump, Senior Planner LOCATION MAP Tentative Minor Subdivision Map #95-38: Lohr/Briqham 400 Cypress (Assessor Parcel No. 002-111-31) POMOUTA SCHOOL 0 500 looo 15oo 2000 2500 Feet --- : I I I ~'oo.~0 .~.r0 (8£-§6) 'ON ~ NOISIAIGSI1S ~ONIH ~btI~t~JJ~t.I. ~tO& ~ October 6, 1995 Rick Kennedy Engineer, City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 re: Tentative Minor Subdivision-Application 95-38 RECEIVED OCT 0 Dear Mr. Kennedy: I measured our property lines yesterday and confirmed that the oak trees at the north end are within our property and not on the City's property. Per our discussion, I assume that proposed Condition 6 will now be eliminated. With reference to the other Conditions, we have the following problems: Condition No. 5: We are more than happy to pave up to our southern property line, install a sidewalk along that line and provide for the Connerton's driveway entrance. But this condition goes much farther and essentially requires us to build a sidewalk for another property owner (Cook). This is an unreasonable condition. We should not be required to make offsite improvemenks to other properties. If the City is intent upon there being a curved as opposed to an angled corner at Cypress and Pine, then the City should pay for half of those improvements. Condition No. 16, 17, 18 and 19: We have no desire to remove or harm the ~rees on the property as they certainly add to its aesthetic appeal. However, we do not believe that the City has any legal basis for attempting to control what we do With the trees on our property. When I asked for the legal basis for this condition, I was given none because there is none. The proposed conditions place unreasonable restrictions on our use of the property and diminish the useable property. The City has neither, the right nor the power to do this. Thank you for considering these objections to. the proposed conditions; we hope that you will agree to amend the conditions accordingly. If you do not so agree, please consider this letter our request for an appeal to the Planning Commission and to have the matter placed on the next Planning Commission agenda. JPL:kb JAMESl CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION NO. 95-38 (LOHR/BRIGHAM) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The following Conditions of Approval shall be made a permanent part of the project proposal for Tentative Minor Subdivision Map #95-38, shall remain in force regardless of the property ownership, and shall be implemented in order for the entitlement to remain valid: 1. Standard Conditions 1-24 (ATTACHMENT A) . A Parcel Map will be required pursuant to Local Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval with materials, fees and substantiating documents required by the City Engineer. o J All taxes now due, or past due, shall be paid prior to the approval of the Parcel Map. The Tentative Map will expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of its approval or conditional approval. . Street improvements consisting of curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway aprons, street pavement and base, and the adjustment of the existing manhole and water valves to grade shall be constructed along the frontage on Cypress Avenue and Pine Street. The street improvements shall be designed by a Civil Engineer and submitted on an Improvement Plan (plan and profile) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The curb and gutter alignment shall be circular along the frontage which shall join existing curb and gutter. The applicant shall provide for and construct a common driveway approach for the proposed twenty-foot wide private road and the existing driveway to the east of the project site. Si A twenty-foot wide easement meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and located along the southern property line of proposed Lot 2 and terminating at the eastern property line of proposed Lot 3 shall be dedicated to the City of Ukiah for public utility purposes. . The private road shall be designed and constructed to receive lot drainage and other historic surface drainage at the project site. Surface drainage collected by the private road shall be discharged to the public street via a parkway drainage. Se ge 10. The private road shall be located a minimum of fifteen feet from the eastem property line of the site unless a it is determined by a certified arborist in a report submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval that the construction and maintenance of the road at a point closer than fifteen feet would not be detrimental to the continued health and survival of the existing trees located north of the road. The private road shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the requirements of Section 9251(A-H) of the City of Ukiah's Municipal Code, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for any residential structure(s) on proposed Lots 2 or 3. All residences constructed on the site that utilize the private road proposed for the project shall have addresses posted in the front of the residence or on the residence, and at the intersection of the private road and Cypress Avenue. 11. 12. 13. 14. The private road shall be posted with signs every twenty-five feet that indicate "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING". No grading shall be allowed on the project site without the review and approval of a Grading Plan by the City Engineer. This Grading Plan shall restrict grading within twenty feet of the top of the bank for Orr Creek unless it is approved as an emergency measure by the City Engineer or a federal or state agency with jurisdiction in this area, and shall include erosion control measures for building pads, road construction or other development that the City Engineer determines would induce erosion on the site. Stockpiled soils and soils exposed by grading or other construction activities shall be watered regularly to ensure that dust resulting from the development of building pads, access roads, driveways, or other construction is contained on the site. The boundary of the 100-year floodplain, as it is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Panel No. 060186 0001 E (revised August 5, 1985), shall be shown on the Parcel Map and labeled as "AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING DURING 100-YEAR FLOOD EVENT". Vertical datum to verify areas subject to 100-year flood events is to be taken from benchmark RM3, as shown on the FIRM. Since the vertical datum used to establish elevations on the Tentative Parcel Map is not shown on the map, a civil engineer or land surveyor shall be required to provide verification or certification to the City Engineer that the datum on the FIRM and the 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Tentative Parcel Map are equivalent if the elevations on the Tentative Parcel Map are utilized to establish flood boundaries. No tree(s) shall be removed from the site unless permitted as part of a Landscape Plan reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning, who shall determine if the tree removal will require the completion of a report by a certified arborist. There shall be no grading, trenching, landscaping or other development within twenty feet of the trunks of the existing Oak trees located on the northern portion of the site unless it is approved by the Director of Planning, who shall determine if such work will require the completion of a report by a certified arborist. All required improvements are deferred until a Building Permit is approved for the development of a residence or other structure on one of the parcels within the minor subdivision, pursuant to Section 66411.1 of the Subdivision Map Act. The measures listed in Special Conditions 5, 15, and 18 shall be shown in a Note on the Final Parcel Map and/or the Map Data Sheet for the Final Parcel Map. o, A fire hydrant shall be installed by the developer(s) of the site at a location subject to the review and approval of the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of any Building Permits for development of the site. CITY OF UKIAH STANDARD CONDITIONS Where the action of the Planning Commission so indicates, any or all of the following Standard Conditions may be incorporated by reference into the Commission's determination on any.matter before it: . All use, construction, or occupancy shall conform to the application and to any supporting documents submitted therewith. . Any constructiOn, and the location thereof, shall conform to any maps, sketches, or plot plans accompanying the application or submitted by applicant in support thereof. . Any construction shall comply with the "Standard Specifications" for such type of construction now existing or which may hereafter be promulgated by the Engineering Department of the City of Ukiah; except where higher standards are imposed by law, rule, or regulation or by action of the Planning Commission such standards shall be met. . . In addition to any particular condition which might be imposed; any construction shall comply with all building, fire, electric, plumbing, occupancy, and structural laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances. / Applicant shall be required to obtain any approval which is required by law, regulation, or ordinance. . . Building permits shall be issued within two year after the effective date of the use permit, variance, or site development permit or same shall be null and void. In the event the building permit cannot be issued within the stipulated pedod from the project approval date, a one year extension may be granted by the Director of Planning if no new circumstances impact the project. If any use permitted shall cease for six (6) consecutive months, then the dght to any variance or use permit permitting such use shall terminate and such variance or use permit shall be revocable by the granting body. . If any condition, special or standard, is violated or if any required approval is not obtained, then the vadance or use permit granted shall be null and void; otherwise to continue in full force and effect indefinitely until otherwise terminated and shall run with the land. . Except as otherwise specifically noted, any variance, use permit, or site development permit shall be granted only for the specific purposes stated in the action approving such variance, use permit, or site development permit and shall not be construed as eliminating or modifying any building, use, or zone requirements except as to such specific purposes. 10. All curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street paving which are broken or damaged or driveways which will not be used are to be removed and replaced as required by the City Engineer. 11. All on-site paving shall be a minimum of 2" of asphalt concrete with a 6" aggregate base, or an approved option. 12. On-site drainage shall be to the approval of the City Engineer. 13. All work within the City right-of-way shall be performed by a properly licensed Contractor with a current City of Ukiah Business License. Contractor must submit copies of proper insurance coverage (Public Liability, $1,000,000; Property Damage, $1,000,000) and current Workman's Compensation Certificate. 14. An encroachment permit from the Public Works Department is required to perform all work within the street right-of-way. 15. Stockpiled soil shall be protected from erosion, and drainage from all disturbed and stockpiled soils shall be directed on site to a disposal location approved by the City Engineer. 16. Sewer, water, and electdc service shall conform to the specifications of the City Department of Public Utility. 17. Street improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street trees shall be as per the City Engineer's recommendations. 18. All signing to conform to the City of Ukiah Sign Code. 19. Any roof-mounted air conditioning, heating, and ventilation apparatus be aesthetically screened from view consistent with the amhitecture of the building on which it is Ioca(ed. 20. Any outdoor refuse/recycle containers be aesthetically screened from view. Garbage shall not be visible outside the enclosure. 21. 22. Landscaping plan be approved by the Director of Planning Prior to placement (single-family dwellings and duplexes are exempt). · Landscaping be irrigated by an automated irrigation system and maintained in a neat, weed-free manner. 23. Hours of construction be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except for owner occupied single family/duplex construction which can also occur from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday provided no heavy construction equipment or vehicles are utilized. 24. All conditions be completed prior to release Of final inspection and issuance of use and occupancy permit. Revised October 27, 1993 STANDARD CONDITIONS MU:REPORTS~EPORT2 0 Cook Exis ~ ~n g dr ~,~ I · -- -"50 SSMH p, Existing cu, gutter ond o fO zo zo ,~ ~ £.f. CITY OF UKIAH PLANNING REPORT DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: FROM: City of Ukiah City Engineer City of Ukiah Planning Department SUBJECT: Tentative Minor Subdivision Map (#95-38) APPLICANTS: James P. Lohr and Kathy Brigham PROJECT SUMMARY: Approval of the proposed Tentative Minor Subdivision would allow the division of a 0.78 acre parcel of record into three parcels of record that would measure 15,340 square feet, 12,200 square feet and 12,160 square feet. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed site is located at 400 Cypress Avenue, directly north the intersection of Cypress Avenue with Pine Street (Assessor Parcel No. 002-111-31). / DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of Tentative Minor Subdivision Map #95-38 on the grounds that the division of this project site is consistent with the goals and policies of the Ukiah General Plan, the requirements of the Municipal Code for Type I subdiviSions and the Zoning Code requirements for the R-1 (Single Family Residential) District. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City of Ukiah as Lead Agency has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15315, which exempts minor land divisions of lands in urban areas where no variances or exceptions are required, all services are available, the parcel(s) have not been previously divided and slopes do not exceed twenty percent. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING DISTRICT: R-1 (Single Family Residential) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed subdivision map would allow the division of a parcel into three parcels that could eventually be developed with single family residences. This parcel is located adjacent to a small parcel owned by the City of Ukiah and Orr Creek to the north, and parcels containing single family residences on the east, south and west. The 39,700 square foot parcel is undeveloped except for a small barn that is being dismantled. There are wood or wood and wire fences between the project site and the parcels to the north, east and west. The site is relatively flat, with a slight decline in grade from the northwest portion of the site to the southeast comer of the site. The interior portions of the site have not been planted with trees or bushes, but there are approximately fifteen mature trees that are planted on the parcel that are within ten feet' of the northern property line. These trees provide a thick screen between the site and parcels to the north, and provide an effective shading of the site from morning sun. The northern portion of the site is partially shaded by seven Live Oak tree clusters that contain trees that measure between twenty to forty inches in diameter at breast height (dbh), and approximately forty to fifty feet in height. These trees are not located on the project site, but are only one to five feet to the north and their limbs extend over the northern areas of two of the proposed lots. Proposed Lot 1 would be approximately 15,340 square feet in gross area, but would only have 9,540 square feet in net area due to a forty-foot wide easement that would extend along the east side of the lot from its southern boundary to proposed Lot 2. This easement would contain a twenty-foot wide access drive. Proposed Lot 2 would be located on the northeast portion of the site, and would be approximately 12,160 square feet in gross area. This lot, however, would also contain a portion of the proposed easement area along its southern boundary, and would only be 9,040 square feet in net area. This easement would contain a portion of the twenty-foot wide access drive and a ten-foot wide driveway for access to proposed Lot 3. Proposed Lot 3 would be approximately 12,200 square feet in area arid contains no proposed easements. STAFF ANALYSIS: Planning Department staff reviewed project plans to ensure that the proposed parcels would in comply with lot size and width requirements for Type I subdivisions, as established in Division 9, Chapter 1 of the Municipal Code, and with the lot development standards contained in the Zoning Code for parcels in R-1 zoning (Sections 9015-9023). Based on this analysis, staff has determined that all three of the proposed parcels contain sufficient lot area and lot width to comply with these standards. Proposed Lots 2 and 3 do not contain frontage on a public street, and are, therefore, not considered to be building sites, as defined in Municipal Code Section 9283. However, these lots can be considered as building sites if the proposed access .easement is approved as part of the proposed division, and the proposed private drive is extended to proposed Lots 2 and 3 with a width of twenty feet. These design modifications would bring the proposed private drive into compliance with the requirements listed in Section 9251. This Code section allows parcels without public street frontage to be considered as building sites if requirements for the provision of a private access drive are complied with. Full compliance with these standards, however, will require the actual development of the drive in accordance with specific requirements, including those for road width, materials, maintenance agreements and posting of the access way. These requirements, which are listed in as A-H in Section 9251, have been attached to this report, and a Special Condition has been included by staff to ensure that future development of the site is done in accordance with these standards. Structures that could be developed on the lots created by the approval of this project are not shown on project plans, and staff could not determine if compliance with development standards for building heights, setbacks, yard areas, parking or additional requirements will be complied with. Planning staff can, however, require compliance with these standards during the review of required building permits, and it is not necessary to determine compliance during review of this project. Planning Department staff also reviewed impacts to trees that might result if this project is approved. The only trees located on the site are located along the north side of the property line, and the applicant has indicated that none of these Oak and Conifer trees will be removed. Planning staff is recommending that a Special Condition be required to ensure that these trees are not removed unless it is determined that they are unhealthy or pose a risk to the health and safety of persons living on or adjacent to the proposed parcels. This condition also requires that the location of the proposed access drive be shifted approximately five feet to the west of its proposed location to provide more suitable living conditions for the trees, unless an arborist determines that this measure is not necessary for the continued health and survival of the trees. Planning staff have also recommended the adoption of Special Conditions to limit development activities on the twenty-foot wide area south of the project site's northern property line since this area is located under the driplines of the mature Valley Oaks located directly the north of the site. These trees are on a narrow lot located between the project site and Orr Creek that is owned by the City of Ukiah, and are close enough to proposed Lots 2 and 3 that their driplines overhang these lots and their root systems are located beneath the lots. Staff is, therefore, concerned that activities associated with residential construction and landscaping could be detrimental to the continued health and survival of these trees, and conditions designed to protect these trees have been recommended. If approved, these conditions would restrict development activities be to areas that are at least twenty feet from the trunks of the trees, and requrire that this area be maintained as an access easement that would allow City tree crews to maintain the trees since the trees. Staff also reviewed the potential for on-site flooding since areas on proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3 would be susceptible to flooding from Orr Creek during 100-year flood events, according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (Community Panel No. 060186 0001 E - revised 8/5/85) for the area. No vertical datum has been provided as part of this division, but it is the opinion of Planning staff that all three of the proposed lots could be developed with residential uses. Such development, however, would require the use of fill to elevate finished floors above the 100-year flood event level, particularly on Lots 2 and 3. Therefore, staff has recommended the inclusion of Special Conditions to ensure that information about the 100-year flood levels is included on the Parcel Map that would be prepared for the project, and that the addition of fill will be subject to review and approval of a Grading Plan by the City Engineer. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed subdivision meets or exceeds all applicable Municipal Code requirements for lot divisions, including those for Type I subdivisions and those in R-1 Zoning, and will generate no potentially significant effects or impacts to the project site and adjacent properties if the proposed Conditions of Approval are adopted. FINDINGS: The Planning Department's recommendation for approval of this project is based, in part, on the following findings: 3 . The proposed lots that would be created by the approval of the division are consistent with the Municipal Code provisions for Type I subdivisions and the Zoning Code standards for permitted uses, building site areas and required parking areas; . The division of the parcel will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort or general, welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, or be detrimental to property or improvements on or around the site, or be harmful to the general welfare of the City because the proposed lots are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and comply with all requirements for permitted uses and lot standards of the underlying R-1 zone. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The following Conditions of Approval shall be made a permanent part of the project proposal for Tentative Minor Subdivision Map #95-38, shall remain in force regardless of the property ownership, and shall be implemented in order for the entitlement to remain valid: 1. Standard Conditions 1-24. 1 A Parcel Map will be required pursuant to Local Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act and shall be submitted to the City Engigeer for review and approval with materials, fees and substantiating documents required by the City Engineer. 3. All taxes now due, or past due, shall be paid prior to the approval of the Parcel Map. e The Tentative Map will expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of its approval or conditional approval. e Street improvements consisting of curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway aprons, street pavement and base, and the adjustment of the existing manhole and water valves to grade shall be constructed along the frontage on Cypress Avenue and Pine Street. The street improvements shall be designed by a Civil Engineer and submitted on an Improvement Plan (plan and profile) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The curb and gutter alignment shall be circular along the frontage which shall join existing curb and gutter. The applicant shall provide for and construct a common driveway approach for the proposed twenty-foot wide private road and the existing driveway to the east of the project site. . A twenty-foot wide easement meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and located along the east side of proposed Lots 1 and 2, and the north sides of proposed Lots 2 and 3, shall be dedicated to the City of Ukiah for public utility and creek maintenance access purposes. ,, ge 10. 11. A twenty-foot wide easement meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and located along the southern property line of proposed Lot 2 and terminating at the eastern property line of proposed Lot 3 shall be dedicated to the City of Ukiah for public utility purposes. The private road shall designed and constructed to receive lot drainage and other historic surface drainage at the project site. Surface drainage collected by the private road shall be discharged to the public street via a parkway drainage. The private road shall be located a minimum of fifteen feet from the eastem property line of the site unless a it is determined by a certified arborist in a report submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval that the construction and maintenance of the road at a point closer than fifteen feet would not be detrimental to the continued health and survival of the existing trees located north of the road. The private road shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the requirements of Section 9251(A-H) of the City of Ukiah's Municipal Code, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for any residential structure(s) on proposed Lots 2 or 3. / All residences constructed on the site that utilize the private road proposed for the project shall have addresses posted in the front of the residence or on the residence, and at the intersection of the private road and Cypress Avenue. 12. 13. 14. 15. The private road shall be posted with signs every twenty-five feet that indicate "FIRE LANE- NO PARKING". No grading shall be allowed on the project site without the review and approval of a Grading Plan by the City Engineer. This Grading Plan shall restrict grading within twenty feet of the top of the bank for Orr Creek unless it is approved as an emergency measure by the City Engineer or a federal or state agency with jurisdiction in this area, and shall include erosion control measures for building pads, road construction or other development that the City Engineer determines would induce erosion on the site. Stockpiled soils and soils exposed by grading or other construction activities shall be watered regularly to ensure that dust resulting from the development of building pads, access roads, driveways, or other construction is contained on the site. The boundary of the 100-year floodplain, as it is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Panel No. 060186 0001 E (revised August 5, 1985), shall be shown on the Parcel Map and labeled as "AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING DURING 100-YEAR FLOOD EVENT". Vertical datum to verify areas subject to 100-year flood events is to be taken from benchmark RM3, as shown on the FIRM. Since the vertical datum used to establish elevations on the Tentative Parcel Map is not shown on the map, a civil engineer or land surveyor shall be required to proVide verification or certification to the City Engineer that the datum on the FIRM and the Tentative Parcel Map are equivalent if the elevations on the Tentative Parcel Map are utilized to establish flood boundaries. 16. No tree(s) shall be removed from the site unless written evidence is submitted by a certified arborist that requires the removal of the tree(s) due to health problems or for safety reasons. 17. There shall be no grading or other construction within twenty feet of the trunks of the existing Oak trees located on the parcel north of the project site unless written evidence, that such work will not adversely impact the tree(s) is submitted by a certified arborist for the review and approval of the Planning Director. 18. Landscaping within twenty feet of the Oak trees located on the parcel north of the project site shall be limited to non-plant materials (e.g. wood chips or bark) unless plants used are tolerant of the natural and seFni-arid growth conditions of the Oak species located on the site. 19. Sprinkler systems for landscaping located within twenty feet of the Oak trees located on the parcel north of the project site shall be installed in a manner that will restrict the irrigation of areas located within the dripline of the oak trees. 20. All required improvements are deferred until a Building Permit is approved for the development of a residence or other structure on one of the parcels within the minor subdivison, pursuant to Section 66411.1 of the Subdivision Map Act. 21. These measures shall be listed in a Note on the Final Parcel Map and/or the Map Data Sheet for the Final Parcel Map. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Project Review Committee Notes for meeting on September 18, 1995 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: reviewed this Planning Report. Dave Lohse, Associate Planner The following personnel, respectively, have prepared and October 2, 1995 To: Planning Department, City of Ukiah Attn: David Lohse, Associate Planner ... Re' Tentative Minor Subdivision Application No. 95-38 Please consider the following opinions, ideas and questions which my husband and I have regarding the proposed subdivision of the property which borders the West side of our lot. 1. We are concerned about our continued access to Cypress and Pines Streets. Our driveway presently accesses Pine and Cypress Streets at their juncture. 2. The edge of Cypress Street, as it zigzags at Pine Street, is erroded and depressed deeply enough that it fills with water during the rainy season and becomes a very big mud t~t~ddle. I~ car-traf['ic from a~ additional three housei~olds enters Cypress Street at this point, I think this area will become a mud pond. / 3. Mr. Lohse, of your department, assured me that the large oak trees at the edge of Orr Creek which borders the North side of the lot will not be cut down or endangered. 4. We have the same concerns about the trees bordering the lot along the East side, and Mr. Lohse has also assured me that they will be spared. 5. We are concerned with the way the division o~ tl~e property is proposed, in that one of the lots wraps around the Scott residence. A house built on this lot would be very close to the Scott house and would encroach on their privacy. Perhaps if the parcel were divided into 2 lots rather than 3 this clumsy arrangement could be avoided. 6. The present fence between our lot and this, is in good shape toward the rear of the property, but is a mess in some areas. We haven't done anything to improve the fence because no one lived on the other side and we didn't feel the need for a screen and barrier. We believe the cost of improving the fence should be the responsibility of the subdivider. ' Thank you for your attention. RECEIVED OCT 0 3 1995 (:ny OF UKIAH PLANNING DEPT. Sincerely, Carol Connerton Mr. Lohse answered no. The Findings can be made in this case. The fire walls are important but the setback is not a critical factor. He would have more trouble making the Findings allowing the applicant to exceed the 11 per cent requirement for the second unit. The second unit square foot area cannot exceed 11 per cent of the lot size. In this case it would, if it is classified as a second unit. It is critical that it would have been established as such prior to annexation. Mr. Tappin stated the property owners on Dora and Washington built a two story unit which is occupying about 80% of their lot. Mr. Lohse indicated his awareness of this situation end has to determine how that was done. el Tentative Minor Subdivision A=[~lication No. 95-38 ~s filed bv James P, Lohr and Kathy Bri.aham, to allow the division of a sinale, 0.78 acre parcel of recold located in the R-1. Sin;le Family Residential, Zonin~ District, into three parcels of record measurin_a 9,340 souare feet. 12,160 square feet and 12,000 square feet. on DroDertv located at 400 CvDress Avenue, Assessor Parcel NO. 002-111-;31. Associate Planner David Lohse advised that the intent is to allow the division of a single parcel of record into three parcels. The lot is currently vacant. There don't appear to be any major problems from the planning aspect at this point. / Jim Lohr, applicant, indicated the figure 9,540 square feet was in error. The correct figure is 9,340 square feet. John Yoast, Electrical Technician, asked Mr. Lohse if the street was going to be continued with a curb and gutter. Mr. Lohse answered yes, he thought so, although no representative from the Engineering Department was present to confirm that. He suggested Engineering be reminded of the meeting. With reference to the map, discussion followed regarding access, the location of the pole, City boundaries, and the extension of the curb and gutter. It was decided that electrical service would be underground. Mr. Yoast stated the applicant could trench from the pole, with secondary services coming out of the pole box to the various lots. The City prefers to hang the service on or near the garage. Mr. Lohr indicated that at this time he had no design for houses. Mr. Yoast stated wherever primary conduit ends, or where the transformer sits, is where an easement would end so they would have access for a' PUE into that point. The City will put in the pole and anchor, the applicant will dig the trench, put in the conduit, pour the pad for the transformer, and the City will put the wire up. PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE Meeting Notes September 18, 1995 Page 4 Larry Woods, Associate Civil Engineer, arrived, representing Engineering. Mr. Lohr inquired if the City was purchasing the transformer. Mr. Yoast answered that in the Code it states the developer purchases residential transformers. The City supplies the transformer if it is designated commercial. - Discussion followed regarding the maintenance of the transformers. Clif Shepard, Building Inspector, had no comments. Larry Woods, Associate Civil Engineer, stated the main problem is that the paved access road would have to go to the front of Lot 3, which extends through the area of the 10 foot driveway. Mr. Lohr asked whether the Fire Department allows 10 or 20 feet. Mr. Woods stated the requirement is for a 20 foot paved access to each lot developed. Mr. Lohse suggested that applied to the 10 foot extension. Mr. Woods agreed. Mr. Lohse inquired whether the City had easements where Mr. Lohr's property starts, on the City maintained right-of-way, the area north of the edge of pavement. Mr. Woods stated he didn't know even though it appears that way from the drawings. Being frontage it would also have to be improved in terms of curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Mr. Lohr stated he would pave so he would have access to his road and put in a curb and gutter to his property line. Mr. Woods observed the applicant does not have full frontage connecting from one lot to another. The proper way to do that would be a curb. Frontage would come around half way and then stop. Mr. Lohse suggested they continue the discussion until after the meeting, since he did not give Engineering adequate preparation time. Carvet Wiles, Water & Sewer Operations, indicated he had no problems with the project, and the applicant knows each lot will have to be independently served by water and sewer. Both the sewer and water main extensions are proposed. Mr. Lohr stated he wanted to bring a 6" sewer down and bring 4" laterals to it. He would leave the three water meters on Cypress. Discussion followed where it was determined the sewer would run up a deeded easement and lateral off into the existing manhole. PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE Meeting Notes September 18, 1995 Page 5 Mr. Wiles asked what Mr. Sprehn wanted. Roger Sprehn, Fire Marshal, left the meeting for an emergency at 10:20 a.m. Mr. Lohse read Mr. Sprehn's written comments. 1. A Fire Lane is required. The access'and utility easement with turn-around shown on the layout will be adequate for this purpose. The Fire Lane will need to be posted as approved by the Fire Department. Parking on this lane will be subject to citation. 2. A fire hydrant is required for this subdivision, a location near the entrance to the fire lane will be adequate. Precise location subject to approval of the Fire Department. Mr. Lohr stated he will put the hydrant near the entrance, depending on where the water pipe is located. Mr. Lohse indicated one issue in terms of setbacks is that they would not be on public street frontage. When the applicant wants to secure building permits for residences they will need to establish front, side, and rear yard setbacks. Another concern is the possibility of construction close to the creek and what impacts that might have. There is no set criteria, but it would be advisable to look at those as being rear yard areas, and that would establish an area for a 20' setback which would keep them out of the flood plain and critical riparian and environmental areas. Mr. Shepard asked if a 20' setback is normal. ., Mr. Lohse answered 15' was the correct setback. Mr. Lohr asked at some time to discuss implications regarding the setback. It was suggested to informally meet after adjournment to answer further questions from the applicant. Mr. Lohse stated that he still needs an environmental determination from the Senior Planner, and then he can define a date for the City Engineer meeting. If appealed then it would go to the Planning Commission. Mr. Lohr stated he is not aware of any complaints. Mr. Woods indicated there appears to be a possibility of lot to lot drainage involved, where the applicant will have to accept water that comes from other lots, and he would like to see a grading plan. Mr. Lohr replied he will not interrupt the contours of the property, end will do a grading plan. He indicated on the map that the property gently slopes and water will go out to the storm drain. Mr. Woods stated the applicant needs to give a drainage easement or possibly a piped drainage so that Lot 3 doesn't get blocked off from drainage by Lot 1. This will be discussed PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE Meeting Notes September 18, 1995 Page 6 at the City Engineer meeting. Frontage improvements probably will require a street tree. Work done within the public right-of-way would be done under an encroachment permit. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:43 a.m. Da~T~w Lohse, As~t"e ~anner ,/ Marge Giuntoli, Recording Secretary b:pr91895.min PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE Meeting Notes September 18, 1995 Page 7 November 21, 1995 Fred Schneiter, Mayor City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 9548,~/ ~/ Honorable Mayc~r and Members of the City Council: I ask that you concur that the City's special condition 5 requiring offsite road improvements in connection with a 3 parcel tentative map is excessive, and thereby uph~ld the appeal of the Planning Commission's October 25 decision filed by Jim Lohr. The condition violates personal property rights, in that it is inconsistent with the City code, is not supported by adopted City facility planning, and fails to demonstrate that the need is roughly proportional to the development impact. As background, the Planning Commission on October 25, 1995 upheld the City Engineer's decision to approve the tentative map with special condition 5 requiring the construction of offsite improvements (i.e., improved encroachment, sidewalk, curb and gutters) along the neighboring 60+ feet of road frontage at Pine and Cypress Streets. (The frontage adjacent to the subject property is about 40 feet wide.) In my judgment, the evidence in the record does not support this exaction. Condition 5 is contrary to the City Code requirement that road improvements must be constructed along the public road frontage of the property subject to development. There is no requirement for offsite improvements applicable to th~s case. The City Engineer stated that condition 5 advances the City's desire to improve health and safety via facility improvements throughout the City. However, the required offsite improvements are not identified as deficiencies in the City's facility plans. I believe this is a condition of convenience, it is arbitrary and not founded in law or facility planning, and no degradation to public health or safety will result from the elimination of the offsite condition. Last, but most bothersome, the requirement for offsite improvements ignores the City's obligation, vis-a-vis Dolan v. City of Tigard, a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court takings case. The City has not made an individualized determination as to how the development creates the need for offsite public improvements. This determination is the basis for demonstrating that the condition is roughly proportional to the impact caused and does not impose an excessive financial burden compared to the property's profit potential. Sincerely, Phillip Ashiku Chairman, Ukiah Planning Commission AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO.: 8c DATE: December 6, 1995 REPORT SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF USE PERMIT AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 95-48 (PLOWSHARES) SUMMARY: On November 8, 1995, the Planning Commission, by a 2-1 vote, denied Use Permit Amendment No. 95-48, based on the determination that the approval of the (Continued on Pages 2-4) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Planning Commission recommends denial of the applicant's appeal, OR 2. Planning Department recommends approval of the applicant's appeal, subject to the modified Conditions of Approval recommended by the Planning Department. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: 1. Determine that additional information is required and remand to staff for further review as may be articulated by Council. Appropriation requested: N/A Citizen advised: Legal Notice posted and advertised Requested by: Carole Brodsky for Plowshares Prepared by: Dave Lohse, Associate Planner Coordinated with: Bob Sawyer, Planning Director, and Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Request for Appeal of Planning Commission action to City Council (dated 11/14/95). 2. Minutes of Planning Commission meeting on 11/8/95 (including Findings). 3. Planning Report prepared for Use Permit Amendment #95-48 (dated 10/27/95). APPROVEd:. ~ /-~~~A ~ace' ho-rsley, Cit~ ~anager PROJECT SUMMARY (continued): amendment would provide substantial nuisance impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood and provide a precedent for approving regular weekend kitchen operation at the Plowshares facility. Potential impacts described by opponents of the project at the Planning Commission hearing include a negative effect on property values, parking problems for the neighborhood, and an increase in police calls to the area. Several residents also indicated they were concerned that approval of this project would provide an incentive and a precedent for approval of regular weekend dining room use. The proposed amendment contains two modifications of a previously approved Use Permit (#92-20) that allows the Plowshares facility to operate at the project site. The conditions of this Use Permit restrict the public use of the dining room facilities at the project site to the hours of 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The applicants have indicated that the primary intent of the proposed amendment application is to allow the kitchen facilities at the project site to be used for a Christmas dinner from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, December 23 of this year. In addition, the applicants have requested a modification of Use Permit conditions that would allow the Director of Planning to allow public use of the dining room on three weekend days during any calendar year, without the requirement for an amendment of the Use Permit. No specific dates are requested as part of this application since the desired weekend operating dates may change from year to year. The required hours of operation for the Plowshares facility were originally established by the approval of Use Permit #85-12. This permit includes Condition No. 2, which restricts public use of the entire facility to 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m, Monday through Friday. These operating hours were established when Plowshares' primary function was to serve meals. The subsequent approval of a second Use Permit (#92-20) permitted the expansion of the Plowshares facility, including the operation of shower and laundry facilities. Condition No. 1 of this permit requires that all applicable conditions of Use Permit No. 85-12 remain in effect as part of the approval for Use Permit No. 92-20, including Condition No. 2, as described above. Separate operating hours for the laundry and shower facilities were established by the inclusion of Condition No. 7, which restricts the use of these facilities to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. Therefore, the proposed modification of Use Permit 92-20 to allow the revision of the operating hours for public use of the dining room will require the modification of Conditions No. 1 and 7 of this permit to clearly establish hours for the varying uses at the facility. These modifications include changing Condition No. 1 to allow the deletion of Cathy McKay City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 PLOWSHARES POST OFFICE BOX 475 150 LUCE AVENUE UKIAH, CA 95482 707.462.8682 , ..... $,, November 14, 1995 Dear Ms. McKay, , . · . . On behalf of the Board of Directors of Plowshares Community Dining Room, please accept this letter as formal appeal of the City of Ukiah Planning Commission's decision to deny amendment of Use Permit No. 94-44 at a public hearing held on November 8, 1995. As per instructions from Mr. Lohse of the Planning Commission, I am informing you of our intentions. Please contact me with any further instructions or information. Sincerely, Carole ~ Director v ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Commissioners Baker and Smith FINDINGS: 1. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the City General Plan, and conforms to all use and development standards contained in the Airport Industrial Park Planned Development Ordinance. e The proposed amendment to the project does not introduce new potential environmental impacts not previously evaluated; does not produce new information that changes the findings and conclusions in the EIR; and the circumstances under which the project is undertaken have not changed; therefore the certified EIR is hereby referenced and serves as the CEQA document for the project. e The proposed relocation of the wastewater treatment facility will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood, or be detrimental to property or improvements around the site, or be harmful to the general welfare of the City, because it represents a minor shift in location to an area better suited for the facility; and will produce beneficial effects in terms of on-site circulation, and emergency vehicle access around the main building. · . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Planning Commission required that the Conditions of Approval required for the approval of SDP 95-19 be required for this project, as well. These conditions are listed in their entirety in Resolution No. 96-12, which was adopted by the City Council on August 16, 1995. (See City Council Meeting Minutes.) PUBLIC HEARINGS 6A. Use Permit Amendment Application No. 95-48, as filed by Plowshares. to allow the modification of Special Condition No. 7 for Use Permit No. 92-20 to permit the operation of the dining room at the Plowshares facility on specific weekend days during the year, on pro.oerty located in the R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District, at 150 Lute Avenue (.Assessor Parcel No. 003-072-05). Associate Planner David Lohse advised of several minor corrections to the staff report. These included: Page 3. 2nd Para~aph. Line 1: Hours should be 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., not 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Page 3.2nd Paragraph. Last line: Six days should be three days Page 5. Condition of Approval No. 1: Should be Condition No. 2, not Condition No. 1 Page 5. Last Para~aph: Hours should be changed as described above MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 November 8, 1995 He further advised that the existing Plowshares facility provides varying services for the portion of the Ukiah population that its staff has defined as "people in need." Included at the facility are offices for staff, shower facilities and laundry facilities (by appt. only), and a community dining room. The use of these facilities is permitted by the approval of previous discretionary permits by the Planning Commission, including Use Permit g85-12, which first allowed the dining room operation and office uses. Use Permit 092-20 was subsequently permitted to allow an addition to the structure that would accommodate additional office spaces and the shower and laundry facilities. A previous Use Permit Amendment to amend Use Permit 092-20 and allow regular weekend operations of the dining room was applied for by Plowshares and denied by the Planning Commission in 1993. The proposed project consists of two requests: The primary request in this amendment is a request to allow the Plowshares staff the opportunity to serve a Christmas dinner on Saturday, December 23 of this year. Planning Department staff have been told by Ms. Carole Brodsky that this date has been selected to allow the maximum number of staff and volunteers to assist. After consulting with Planning staff, the Plowshares staff have also requested that the conditions of the Use Permit be amended to allow the Planning Director the authority to allow other weekend rmal servings at the Plowshares site. The number of such servings would be limited to a maximum of three selected days throughout the calendar year. This request is to allow some flexibility in scheduling for' the larger meals traditionally put on around holidays. The hours of operation for the dining room were established by Condition No. 2 for Use Permit #85- 12, which states that: e Public use of the facility is to be restricted to 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, The first part of the amended condition reads: e The hours of operation for the office,, shower facilities and laundry facilities shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 November 8, 1995 This language clearly distinguishes between the hours of operation for the office, shower and laundry facilities, which previous Planning Commission actions permitted during these hours. There is no armndn~nt of the permitted hours included in this language; it is simply an attempt on staffs part to consolidate permitted hours into one Condition of Approval. The second paragraph of Condition No. 7 reads: Public use of the dining room facility shall be from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, unless weekend use of the dining room is permitted by the Director of Planning as part of a pro_m-am to provide meals during special events or holidays. The number of weekend days that may be permitted by the Planning Director during the calendar year shall not exceed three days. The amended Condition would permit the Planning Director to allow weekend use of the dining room without an Amendment application being reviewed at the Planning Commission on a total of three days during the calendar year. It would not permit the modification of regular hours of operation (11 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.), or regular weekend operation of the facility. Therefore, it is staffs opinion that the amended Condition would: Consolidate and clarify existing' Conditions of Approval for the Plowshares facility; b. Permit greater flexibility of the dining room use by Plowshares staff; and C. Be consistent with previous Planning Corm-fission actions to limit weekend use of the dining room. The Planning Departrmnt, therefore, recorntmnds that the proposed amendments be permitted, based in part on Findings 1-3 listed on Page 5 of the Planning Report, and subject to the amended Conditions of Approval listed on Page 5 of the Planning Report Commissioner Larson, referring to Page 4, Paragraph 4, of the staff report, stated it indicates the request would not generate any substantial impacts to the neighborhood, and asked how staff arrived at that determination. Mr. Lohse replied that based on reading the previous Minutes and considering the neighbors' reactions, staff had the opinion that due to the restricted number of days, there would not be an impact. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 7:11 p.m. Evelyn Emery, 175 Luce Avenue, stated she was of the opinion that Plowshares had a negative MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5 November 8, 1995 effect on the property values of recently sold houses in the area, and that the request for only three weekends a year will escalate into more weekends. She said she observes people there all day long, and regardless of Carole Brodsky's claim that Plowshares isn't open on weekends because they are so considerate of the neighbors, she feels the real reason is that the Planning Commission turned down the request. She indicated that the Christmas dinner can be held at St. Mary's school, as has been the practice, or they could have it on Friday. Carole Brodsky, Director of Plowshares, 1801 Sanford Ranch Road, clarified the intention of Plowshare's request to be a simple one, which is to provide for the needs of both the guests and the volunteers who comprise 95% of the people who serve Plowshares. She cited the difficulty of getting people to volunteer on Christmas Day, and stated they are trying to look at balancing the needs of the volunteers with the needs of the community. It is not economically feasible nor their intention to serve regular weekend meals at this time. During their 1993 planning processes, they instituted a regnlar item on their Board of Directors' agenda relative to neighborhood concerns; the meetings are open to the public and the neighbors are always welcome to attend. Commissioner Larson asked if she had m!ked to the neighbors regarding the proposal. Ms. Brodsky replied she had not. Commissioner Larson asked how much outreach had been made, or if there was a proactive effort to reach out to the neighbors, since the last use permit was instituted. Ms. Brodsky replied she had gone door to door to greet the neighbors on either side of the property, as well as the two business neighbors across the street who are immediately impacted. She stated there are clear policies regarding arrival and departure times for guests; however, a lot of the new people are unaware of the rules about the hours. Once they do know the rules, they follow them. Plowshares is not open on weekends at all; there'~ire no volunteers or paid staff. She is the only person there in the afternoons, with the exception of people coming and going bringing donations, so there is some amount of street traffic. She feels the impact is as minimal as possible. Commissioner Larson asked if there had been any kind of vehicular traffic counts conducted. Ms. Brodsky replied no, not that they had conducted. Sue Sieber, 180 Luce Avenue, commented regarding weekend meals, and that there are not many holidays other than Chrism that change from day to day that would effect this. It is not a question of whether people are going to get something to eat; other agencies will serve the meal. She also asked if there had been a request for permission to do fundraisers on weekends. Mr. Lohse replied there had been no request regarding fundraisers, only the dining room facility. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6 November 8, 1995 Ms. Sieber stated she feels that every year they are back fighting for the same thing, and she feared the issue will escalate so that the 3 days will extend to the entire year. Alan Sieber, 180 Luce Avenue, brought forth for the Commissioners' perusal a police report listing the calls and years of occurrence for that area. He pointed out that this year 11 of the 15 calls were directly for Plowshares. It appears that as the number of people that Plowshares serves increases, the more trouble the neighborhood has. Chairman Ashiku commented it was the newly adopted policy of the Planning Commission to photocopy items for the audience upon request. No one came forward with a request for the police report. Ms. Emery contradicted Ms. Brodsky's comments, stating there were people unloading laundry and dogs running around her yard all day long. To say no one is there after 1:00 p.m. is untrue. Mr. Sieber submitted photographs of the area taken the previous Monday at 12:15 p.m. There are no cars showing on the weekend, but there are parked cars which interfere with access to his driveway during the week. The previous Minutes show the curb was supposed to be redlined for "No Parking", but nothing has been done. · · , Marvin Boesel, 185 Mae Street, stated he does not live in the area, but that he does donate to senior citizens and Plowshares through his employmenC He is not in favor of increasing the number of hours Plowshares operates, as it does decrease the property values. He commented that a property owner in the area had a difficult time selling his house, and was forced to drop the value. The amount of traffic is also a problem. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:28 p.m. Commissioner Pruden stated she is a strong supporter of Plowshares both financially and in-kind. She also sat through the entire hearing process in 1993 dealing with the use permit. She took the opportunity to eat lunch there earlier in the day, and noted that across the street there were a number of dogs tied up which the clients were feeding. While she acknowledged the operation is well run, she sees no need to amend the use permit at this point. She further stated she is grateful she does not have this facility next door to her. While she approves of Plowshares, she also realizes it is a great burden to the neighborhood. The previous Planning Commission came to the proper conclusion. Commissioner Larson stated this is a difficult decision for him, since he believes Plowshares is a valuable asset to the community and is doing the best they can under the circumstances. He is sitting on the Planning Commission because he went to bat for his neighborhood and its impacts. He feels strongly about the quality of life in the City's residential areas, and is of the opinion that certain projects threaten that quality of life. While he thinks Plowshares is a wonderful thing, he believes it MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 November 8, 1995 to be in the wrong location. Because of what Plowshares does, they compromised good planning principles to bring the service to the community. He cannot support the project. Chairman Ashiku stated he was disappointed this amendment would not be passed. Three additional days in an entire year is a small price to pay; it is inconsequential compared to the benefit of the services. ON A MOTION by Cornrrfissioner Pruden, seconded by Commissioner Larson, it was carried by the following roll call vote, to deny Use Permit Amendment Application No. 95-48, as filed by Plowshares, to allow the modification of Special Condition No. 7 for Use Permit No. 92-20 to permit the operation of the dining room at the Plowshares facility on specific weekend days during the year. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Larson and Pruden Chairman Ashiku None Commissioners Baker and Smith Chairman Ashiku notified the applicant of the denial of the request, and advised they have until November 18, 1995 to file an appeal. 6B. Use Permit Application No.' 95-44, as filed by .lamie Williams, dba the Car Company, to allow a used car lot on a portion of a parcel located in the C-2 (-Highway Commercial and Restricted Indn.~trial) Zoning DistricL on property located at 1280 and 1290 South State Street (_Assessor Parcel No. 003-540-30) Associate Planner David Lohse advised approval of this project would allow the establishment of a used car lot on the project site, which is located in the C-2 District. · . This car lot would be located on the southwest, portion of an existing commercial site. The design of this project includes: A 3,500 sq.fi, area that will be defined by a 15-foot setback area on the south and east sides and striped parking spaces on the west; Landscaped planter areas along the southern comers of the site; and A small office area attached to the nearby commercial structure to the northwest. The use of this area would also require that one of the existing 40-foot wide driveways along State Street be closed. Planning staff analyzed the project design and found that it complies with applicable use and development standards for the C-2 District. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8 November 8, 1995 CITY OF UKIAH PLANNING REPORT DATE: October 27, 1995 TO: City of Ukiah Planning Commission FROM: City of Ukiah Planning Department SUBJECT: Use Permit Amendment (#95-48) APPLICANT: Plowshares PROJECT SUMMARY: Approval of the proposed Use Permit Amendment would allow the conditions of Use Permit No. 92-20 to be amended to allow the use of the dining room at the Plowshares facility from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on a limited number of weekend days. The primary request by the applicants is to amend the conditions of the Use Permit to specifically allow the operation of the dining room on Saturday, December 23, 1995, in order that a Christmas holiday dinner may be served. The applicants have also requested, as part of this application, that the conditions be amended to allow weekend use of the dining room on three weekend days throughout the calendar year if approved by the Director of Planning. Specific days have not been included as part of this project since the days requested may vary from year to year. The discretionary action associated with this project is quasi-judicial in nature; therefore each decision-maker must physically and personally visit the site prior to participating in the vote to approve, disapprove, or modify the proposed project. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed site is located at 150 Luce Avenue, along the north side of the street, approximately 300 feet west of State Street (Assessor Parcel No. 003-072-05). DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of Use Permit Amendment No. 95-44 on the grounds that the proposed amendment, as conditioned, is consistent with the intent of the previously approved Use Permit (#92-20) and is compatible with existing and historical uses of the project site. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City of Ukiah as Lead Agency approved a Negative Declaration on April 14, 1992, for the initial Use Permit (#92-20) to allow expansion of the Plowshares facility. Potential environmental impacts associated with the operation of the dining room during weekend hours were studied in this environmental analysis, and determined to be less than significant. Therefore, the changes requested in this amendment have been incorporated into the Negative Declaration by reference. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Low Density Residential ZONING DISTRICT: R-1 (Single Family Residential) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of a Use Permit Amendment to allow the modification of the Conditions of Approval for Use Permit (#92-20). This permit, in conjunction with a Variance application (#92-22) permitted an expansion of the Plowshares facility, which provides hot meals for persons defined by the applicants as "in need". This expansion consisted of an addition that contained shower facilities, laundry facilities and additional office space, and the permit stipulated different operating hours than those required for the dining room. Among the conditions required as part of this permit is Condition No. 1, which requires that all applicable conditions of a previously approved Use Permit (#85-12) for the Plowshares facility remain in effect. The applicable conditions of Use Permit No. 85-12 consist of five conditions, including Condition No. 2. This condition states that: . Public use of the facility is to be restricted to 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A review of this Use Permit application and the minutes of the meeting by staff determined that these hours apply only to the dining room portion of the Plowshares facility since the shower facilities now in use at the facility were approved as part of the subsequent Use Permit (#92-20). The application for Use Permit No. 92-20 requested that the hours that the Plowshares facility could be used for showers and laundry be between 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and weekends. However, Condition No. 7 of this permit requires that: . The hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. Although this condition does not expressly state that the hours listed are for office use, showers and laundry only, staff has determined that it was the Planning Commission's intent to allow expanded hours for these uses, but not the operation of the dining room. This intent was subsequently confirmed the Planning Commission's denial on April 14, 1993, of a Use Permit Amendment application that Plowshares staff had requested to allow weekend dining room operation on a week-to-week basis. Therefore, the proposed changes to these conditions require the approval of a Use Permit Amendment to Use Permit No. 92-20. Specifically, the applicants wish to amend Condition No. 1 from Use Permit No. 92-20 to allow the deletion of Condition No. 2 from the list of required conditions for Use Permit No. 85-12. This deletion would also require the modification of Condition No. 7 of Use Permit No. 92-20, which would be changed to read: . The hours of operation for the office, shower facilities and laundry facilities shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. Public use of the dining room facility shall be from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, unless weekend use of the dining room is permitted by the Director of Planning as part of a program to provide meals during special events or holidays. The maximum number of weekend days that may be permitted by the Planning Director during the calendar year shall not exceed three days. STAFF ANALYSIS: Planning staff reviewed the previously approved projects that have been approved for the Plowshares facility since 1984 to determine if the proposed amendments are in conflict with the uses allowed at the Plowshares site. The Minutes from the hearings at which each discretionary permit was approved or denied have been attached to this report. These Minutes include applicable Conditions of Approval. The Plowshares facility was initially permitted by the Planning Commission's approval of a Use Permit (#85-12) and a Variance (85-15) on September 26, 1994. These discretionary permits allowed a multi-purpose community room for serving free meals to people defined as "in need", a kitchen and pantry facilities to prepare food for on-site and off-site distribution programs, and administrative office space. The Conditions of Approval for this project established 11:30 p.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, as the hours of operation for public use of the facility, including the kitchen and dining room. On May 27, 1992, a subsequent Use Permit (#92-20) and Variance (#92-24) were approved by the Planning Commission to allow the expansion of the existing Plowshares facility by allowing the construction of an addition that included showers, laundry facilities and increased office area. The Use Permit approval permitted the Plowshares facility, with the exception of the dining room, to operate between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. The hours of operation for the dining room use were not amended from those required in the previously approved Use Permit (#85-12). In early 1993, an Amendment to Use Permit Application No. 92-20 was applied for by the staff at Plowshares to allow the serving of meals at the site on Saturdays and Sundays. This amendment was denied by the Planning Commission on April 14, 1993, which expressed concerns with potential impacts that the public use of the dining room would have on the adjacent residential neighborhood. The current application consists of two requests. The applicant's primary concern is to amend the conditions of the existing Use Permits to allow a one-time meal service on Saturday, December 23, 1995. This request would permit the Plowshares dining room to be used to serve a Christmas dinner on a weekend day when a more reliable base of staff and volunteers would be available to assist. The second request is to amend the conditions of the Use Permits to allow the Director of Planning the discretion to allow the operation of the dining room facility on a limited number of weekend days for special events and holidays. The applicants have indicated that this allowance would not be for more than three days in any calendar year, and that it would permit a more flexible and more efficient use of the dining room for holiday meals. Planning Department staff have reviewed the actions taken by the Planning Commission on the previous discretionary permits, and it is obvious that it was the Commission's intent that the operation of the dining room at the Plowshares facility be restricted to weekdays only, between the hours of 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.. There was no discussion during any of these actions, however, to indicate whether the Planning Commission objected to a limited weekend operation schedule for the dining room. Therefore, it is the opinion of Planning Department staff that this project does not conflict with previous Commission actions since it does not request that regular weekend use of the dining room be permitted. It is also the opinion of staff that the proposed amendments to the Conditions of Approval for the permit discussed above would provide the Plowshares staff greater flexibility to serve a portion of the community that previous Planning Commission have conceded is "in need". The particular functions that the Plowshares facility provide can not always be done effectively during a regular weekday schedule. Approval of this Amendment application, as conditioned would also eliminate the requirement to process a Use Permit Amendment each time that such a request was forthcoming. It is staff's opinion that the review and approval of requests can, and should, be done administratively if the Planning Commission determines that a limited number of requests could be accommodated without generating substantial impacts to the neighbors of the Plowshares facility. It is the further opinion of the Department that the proposed amendments, as recommended by staff, would be consistent with previously required conditions since it would restrict the number of days this use would be modified to a defined maximum number, and require review and approval of the use by the Planning Director. CONCLUSIONS: It is the conclusion of the Planning Department that the approval of the proposed amendments, as recommended by staff, would do the following: . Consolidate and clarify the conditions required by previously approved discretionary permits that the existing Plowshares facility is required to comply with; . It would permit the Plowshares staff greater flexibility in serving a portion of the Ukiah community that is recognized to be "in need" by allowing a defined number of weekend days for operation of holiday meals and special events; and . It would be consistent with the previous actions of the Planning Commission that prohibited regular weekend use of the kitchen and dining room portion of the Plowshares facility since it restricts the number of days and requires administrative review and approval by the Planning Director. FINDINGS: The Planning Department's recommendation for the approval of this project is based, in part, on the following findings: o The project conforms to all Conditions of Approval for previously approved discretionary actions required to permit the operation of the Plowshares facility; . A Negative Declaration was prepared for the previous Use Permit (#92-20), and approved by the Planning Commission on April 14, 1992, that reviewed weekend operation of the dining room and determined that no significant adverse impacts would be generated by, or associated with, this operation; and , The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the dining room portion of the Plowshares facility during specified weekend hours will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood, or be detrimental to property or improvements around the site, or be harmful to the general welfare of the City, because it is a minor expansion in the hours of operation of an existing use that has been allowed by previous discretionary review and approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Condition of Approval No. 1 for Use Permit No. 92-20 shall be amended to state: . All applicable conditions of Use Permit No. 85-12 shall remain in effect, with the exception of Condition No. 2, which shall be deleted. Condition of Approval No. 7 for Use Permit No. 92-20 shall be amended to state: . The hours of operation for the office, shower facilities and laundry facilities shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. The public use of the dining room facility shall be from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, unless weekend operation of the dining room facility is permitted by the Director of Planning as part of a program to provide meals during special events or holidays. The number of weekend days permitted by the Planning Director shall be restricted to a maximum of three days during the calendar year. These Conditions of Approval shall be made a permanent part of the project, shall remain in force regardless of property ownership, and shall be implemented in order for the entitlement to remain valid. ATTACHMENTS: . 2. 3. 4. 5. Location Map. Existing Conditions of Approval for Plowshares. Pages 2-5 of the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting on 9/26/84. Pages 3-12 of the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting on 5/27/92. Pages 4-12 of the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting on 4/14/93. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The following personnel prepared and reviewed this Planning Report, respectively: Dave Lohse, Associate Planner Robert Sawyer, Planning Director DL:C:\UP#95-48.PC 0 LOCATION MAP USE PERMIT, AMENDMENT APPUCATION NO, 95-48: PLOWSHARES 150 Luce Avenue (Assessor Parcel No. 003-072-05) YOKAYO SCHOOL ,, ~ 5OO loo0 1500 2OOO 2500' ""Feet; .o EXISTING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE PLOWSHARES FACIUTY Pending approval of the proposed Amendment to change the Conditions of Approval required by the approval of various discretionary actions, the operation of the Plowshares facility is subject to the Conditions of Approval listed below. This list has been prepared as an exhibit for Use Permit Amendment No. 95-48. Use Permit No. 85-12: . e e e Be 150 Luce Avenue shall be used by Plowshares to prepare and serve free meals with office space granted for Plowshares. Public use of facility is to be restricted to 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The entire parcel be landscappd, and irrigated by an automated irrigation system and maintained in a n .~.~weed free manner. All conditions be completed prior to use and occupancy. Parking portion of Vadance No. 85-15 be approved. Use Permit No. 90-20. 1. All applicable conditions of Use Permit No. 85-12 remain in effect. 2. Standard Conditions 1-23 (attached). 3. Use of the laundry and shower facilities be by appointment only with a member of staff present on the premises at all times such operation is functioning. 4. On-site parking spaces be paved and striped to City Code specifications. 5. A new six-foot solid-wood fence be constructed along the west property line, north of the 20-foot setback point to replace the existing three foot fence and provide a visual buffer to the new parking area to the approval of the Director of Planning.. 6. The two trees on the west front portion of the property be retained. 7. The hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. 8. An altemate location for the trash dumpster be found to mitigate impact of odor to adjacent neighbors, and measures be taken to mitigate the odor by cleaning the dumpster more often. STAI~ARD CONDITIONS,, · ~here the action of the Coanission so indicates, any or all of the following Standard Conditions nay be incorporated by reference into the Commission's determination on any matter before it: I · All use, construction, or occupancy shall confore to the application and to any supporting documents submitted therewith· · 3. Any construction, and the location thereof, shall confor~ to any maps, sketches, or plot plans accoepanying the application or submitted by applicant in support thereof. Any construction shall compiy with the "Standard Specifications" for such type of construction now existing or which nay hereafter be promulgated by the Engineering Department of the City of Ukiah; except where higher standards are imposed ~y law, rule, or regulation or by action of the Planning Commission such standards shall be met. In addition to any particular condition which might be imposed; any construction shall comply with all building, fire, electric, plumbing, occupancy, and structural laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances. Applicant shall be required co obtain any approval which is required by · law, regulation, or ordinance· All required building permits shall be issued within one year after the effective dace of the use perlit, variance, or site development permit or same shall be null and void. If any use permitted shall cease for six (6) consecutive months, then the right to any variance or use permit permitting such use shall terminate and such variance or use permit shall be revocable by the granting body· e If any condition, special or standard, is violated or if any required approval is not obtained, then the variance or use permit granted shall be null and void; otherwise to continue in full force and effect indefinitely until otherwise terminated and shall run with the land· . Except aa otherwise specifically noted, any variance, usa permit, or site development permit shall be granted only for the specific purposes stated in the action approving such variance, use permit, or site development permit and shall not be construed as eliminating or modifying any building, use, or zone requirements except as to such specific purposes· 10. All curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street paving which are broken or damaged or driveways which will not be used are to be removed and replaced as required by the City Engineer. 11. All on-site paving shall be a minimum of 2" of asphalt conc.rete with aggregate base, or an approved option. 12. On-site drainage shall be to ch· approval of the City Engineer. 13. All work within the City right-of-way shall b, performed by a properly licensed Contractor with a current City of Ukiah Business License. Contractor must submit copies of proper insurance coverage (Public l, iability~ $1,000,0001 Property Damage, $1,000,000) and current Workman's Compensation Certificate. 14. An encroachment permit from the Public Works Department is required to perform all york within the street right-of-way. 15. Sewer and water service shall be as per City Department of Public Works' recommendations. 16. Electric service shall conform to the specifications of the City Department of Electric Utility. 17. Street improvements shall be as per the City Engineer's recomme,dations. 18. All signing to conform to cbs City of Ukiah Sign Ordinance. 19. Any roof-mounted air conditioning apparatus be aesthetically screened from view consistent with the architecture of the building on which it is located. 20. Any outdoor refuse contai:~er be aesthetically screened from view. · 21. Landscaping plan be approved by the Oirector of Planning prior to placement (single-family dwellings and duplexes are exempt). 22. Landscaping be irrigated by an automated irrigation system and maintained in a neat, weed-free manner. 23. Hours of construction be limited to 7~00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Nonday through Saturday. June 21, 1991 STANDARD CONDI?ION$ FORI~S4 -2-- Chairman Ivey ·dvised th·t V·riance Application No. 85-14, filed by Thomas Brigham, is continued, at applicantVs request, to the meeting of October 10, 1984. PUBLIC H~RINHS Am Use Permit Application No. 85-12, P.!owshares~ to establish uses considered as uses appropriate to a public building, 150 Lute Avenue, zoned Bm Variance Application No. 85-15, as filed b2 Plowshares, 150 Lute Avenue, zoned R-l: 1) for a variance from 22 off-street parking spaces to 8 spaces; 2) variance from Sign Code Section 3227 c) relatin~ to allowed square footage of signing in the R~l Zonin~ District Planning Director stated there are tvs proposals for Plowshares. The first is a Use Permit to alloy: 1) A multi purpose comunity roo~ serving free meals to people in need. 2) Kitchen and pantry facilities to prepare and serve food and to sort and distribute food to off-site programs. 3) Administrative and office space for coemmnity emergency relief programs and counseling and referral projects. and the second is a Variance from: l> 2) 22 off-street parking spaces to 8 spaces. City of Ukiah Sign Code Section 3227 c) relating to allowed square . footage of signing in the R-1 zoning District. The definition of a public building according to City of Ukiah Zoning Ordinance, is · building used for public purposes by ·ny department or branch of the federal, state, county or municipal government. The Planning Comiesion determined that uses proposed by Plowshares may be considered as uses appropriate to a public building and thus ~he appli- cation for a use permit. Staff feels by approving the use permit a precedent may be set to allow other offices in the R-1 zones. The Health Department defines the proposed uae · restaurant ·nd staff feels that though the progra~ is worthwhile this use is not appropriate in the zone, therefore staff recommends denial. The parking requirement aa a restaurant use is one space for each 3 seats (50) and one for each volunteer (5) for · total of 22 spaces. The nice can accommodate 8 vehicles nsc 12, as sho~n on the applicant's site plan due to the configuration of the lot. The 22 space allocation does not include any provision for the administrative/office use proposed. The R-1 sign requirements stipulate · sign not exceeding tvs square feet may be on the building and another sign not exceeding tvs square feet HINUTES OF THE PLANNING COHHISSION PAGE 2 SEPTEI. tBEIt 26, 1984 may be on the mailbox. The proposal is a free-standing sign of 32 ~q. ft., the same siSn utilized at the Ma~n Street location which is zoned C-1 and surrounded by coumercial uses. Staff recommends denial of Variance No. 85-15 as no basis for findings for either the parking or the sign portion of the variance, PUBLIC HEARING OPENED - 7:07 Sister Jane Kelly, liO Mendocino Drive, stated she has counted the number of cars since Plowshares has utilized St. Mary's Church facil- ities and the maximum number, includin~ staff and guests, has never exceeded 16. She also stated that lunch starts at 11:30 a.m., and by 12:15 p.m., zhe doors are closed and the site ia cleared by 1:00 p.m. She added that she feels the buildin$ is unique in chez ic was once a church and school and close to a variezy of commercial uses. Glen Dunn, 2501Eastside Road, quoted a verse from the Bible. Diane Crawford, 10&5 South Avenue, szated she felt the application goes against the zonin~ laws and does not agree with the use in the R-1 zone. Nancy Javore, 271 Luce, stated she has no objection co the use of the facility for Plowshares. Ida Phillips, 140 Luce, stated she has no objection to the use and will give peruission for two cars to be parked on her property. Helen Thompson, 140 Lute, stated she has no objection to the applica- Zion. . Rosalie Warble, IO0-B Waush Lane, scaced she feels this is a project which is needed in the community. Ann Near, Hopland, has worked with Plowshares and has found it to be a quiet and useful operation. There is a gardner on staff who will keep the grounds in seed condition. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 7:17 F.N. Commissioner Reddin$ scared he felt ic ia imperative that there be Control of the hours the buildins is used, Commissioner Schneiter con- curred. Nary Rice advised the Commission Chac staff meetings are held in che evenings and asked chaC che times for use be exceeded co evening meet- inss. Commissioner ReddinS asked if a one year permit would be acceptable. Sister Jane Kelly said the lease is for five years and as kitchen facilities will be installed, which will be costly in money and labor, a one year pemit would nsc be acceptable. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PACE 3 SEPTI!24BER 26, 1984 ON A NOTION by CounissionerNastin, seconded by Commissioner Knutson, it was carried by the following roll call vote to approve Use Permit No. 85-12 with the foil,wing conditions: lo 0 . 150 Luce Avenue shell be used by Plowshares to prepare and serve free meals with office space granted for Plowshares. Public use of facility is to be restricted to 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The entire parcel be landscaped and irrigated by an automated irrigation system and maintained in a neat weed free manner. All conditions be completed prior to use and occupancy. Parking portion of Variance No. 85-15 be approved. AYES: Comissio~ers Geronzin, Knutson, Schneiter and Chairman Ivey. NOES: None ABSENT: None Mason, Mastin, Redding, PUBLIC HEARSt REOPENED - 7:39 P.M. Couuuissioner Hason asked that the parking portion of Variance No. 85-15 be heard first and the sign portion second. The Commission concurred. Martin Bradley, I Lorraine Street, stated he feels that applicants do nsc have a chance for input when the Comm~ssion adds conditions to the use permit or variance application. Commissioner Mastin asked Mrs. Phillips if she would be willing to put in vritin$ the use of two spaces on her property for use by Plowshares scoff. Mrs. Phillips agreed. Planning Director advised that as a residence requires two off-street parking spaces, it viii have to be determined if Mrs. Phillips has two extra spaces available for parking. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 7:&5 P.M. Commissioner Schneiter requested applicant consult with staff to resolve the difference in the amount of spaces proposed in an attempt to improve the parking. ON A MOTION by Commissioner Itastin, seconded by Counission Knutson, it was carried by the foil,wins roll call vote to approve Variance No. 85-15 (parking portion) from 22 parking spaces to 8 with the following findings: 1) 2) 3) The parcel is unique due to the existing layout of the building. It is not a grant of special privilege due to the previous uses of the buildin$ as a church and high school both high traffic producing uses. It is not a danger to public health or safety inasmuch as the previous uses were not so considered, and the limited number of hours of public use. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COl~llSSlON PACE & SEPTEHBER 26, 1984 AYES: Comissioners Ceronzin, Xnutson. Mason. Mascin. Redding. SchneiCer and Chairman Ivey NOES: None ABSENT: None ON A MOTION by Commissioner MasCin, seconded by Commissioner Redding, it wes carried by the following roll call vote to deny the siam portion Variance No, 8~-15. AYES: Commissioners Ceronzin, Xnucson, Hasou, Kastin, Redding, Schneicer and Chairman Ivey NOES: None ABSENT: None 7. MISCELLANEOUS ACTION ITEH~ A. Sign Code interpretation Planning Director seated chat ac the Iasc meeting discussion was had regarding an appeal of scarf's determination regarding signing for the "Vineyard". SCarf discussed chis issue rich the City Attorney and it appears chat precise use of the definitions in the Code is necessary. There are Cwo assessor parcels involved and a strict interpretation would preclude the originally approved free-standing sign since it is nsc on the same "parcel" and the contiguous unica are not under common ownership. If chis is the interpretation of the Commission then staff's approval will be reversed and the permit nsc granted. Application for a variance or use permit for this sign could then be pursued. Commissioner Schneicer asked if applicants were made aware of this . meeting. Planning Director noted that all interested parties were at the meeting of September 12 at which time chis subject was continued to this meeting. Commissioner Reddins asked if a free-standing sign could be placed on each parcel. PlanninS Director said his interpretation of the code is chat the structure, not the parking, is part of the business buc ic is for the Planning Commission to interpret the sign code. Duncan James, said chefs is · weakness in the City Code as the issue here has nsc been addressed in the code and che City Council should cure the defect, if there is one, by an appropriate amendment to the City Code. Mr. James feels the proper procedure is for applicants co go through · variance or use permit application. CommissAoner Mascin discussed "off-premise signs" and "premises" and concluded chac signs'chat are nsc located on the premises of the business the sign ~usC be considered as off-premise and applicant should follow through the variance or use permiC as necessary. Commissioners concurred. A-7 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COHHISSION PACE 5 SEPTEI~ER 26. 198& Commissioner Reid noted that if the 23.5 feet was removed from the parcel which fronts Smith Street and it was sold, a circumstance would possibly be created where a person wanting a two-car garage would need to apply for another variance· Mr. Ford noted that the setback at the rearyard (west) will be 15 feet, allowing for a 20-foot garage without & variance· Discussion followed concerning removing the lot line and making the parcels a single property. The applicant indicated that is not an option for him. Public Hearing Closed: 7:18 p.m. Discussion followed concerning the appropriateness of the findings, and if the variance is not granted the boundary line adjustment is not effective. Co~issioner Fart felt this boundary line adjustment will make one lot less livable as a single family residence. ON & MOTION by Commissioner Burke, seconded by Commissioner Reid, it was carried by the following roll call vote to approve Variance Application No. 92-18, based on the following findings: · · · The property is already developed and no new construction is proposed. The lot lines of the subject property setback and building locations, due to their age, pre-date the Zoning Ordinance, thus the unique property circumstances. It would not be a grant of special privilege since the non- conformity is already existing. It will not be detrimental to the heal~h, safety, or welfare of persons residing.in the area· AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Burke, Long, Randolph, and Reid. Chairman Fart. Commissioner Sand. lin. Commissioner Hoppe. Chairman Fart noted that he is not in agreement with the finding that since the building pre-dates the Zoning Ordinance it is unique. Commissioner Hoppe returned at 7:26 p.m. Be Use Permit Application No. 92-20. as filed by p~ovshares, ~0 expand the existina community dinina room facility ~y CO~- structinq · buildina addition to contain showers~ laundry facilities, an office area. and an expansio~ o~ the hours of operatio~ foF plowshares community dinina ~oom, Subject parcel is located at 150 Luce ~venue and zoned R-l, $inq~e- -- MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 3 MAY 27, 1992 yasllv Residential District, l~ Neoatlv~ Declaration of _ Znvironm~ental Imuact has been _Dre_~ared and is available for public review. Variance Xuoli9%ti°n No. 92-24.'as filed by Plovshareso to Eeduce the re_suite4 ~umher 9f on-s$~Q parking spaces for Plowshares conununitv dinina room. Sub4ect parcel is locate4 at xs0 Luce ~ve~u® and zoned R-I. Sinale-Famil~ Residential District. a Neaa~ve D%c~&ration of Environmental ImDact has been prepared and is available for public review. _ _ Planning Director Harris explained that the proposal is for an expansion of the existing Plowshares use at their current location. In 1984, Plowshares received a use permit to prepare and serve free meals. At that same time a variance was granted relative to the parking. Their proposed expansion includes hours of operation, building operation expansion, and also a parking variance. The current hours of operation are from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The proposal would change those hours from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., seven days a week, to be able to provide showers and laundry services to persons on an appointment-only basis. The building expansion is 670 square feet and will house the laundry and shower facilities and an office area. The addition will be constructed of the same type of material and design as the current structure and will be located adjacent to the northeast of the existing facility. The parking variance is a reduction from 27 to 8 parking spaces as there is no additional land available. Also, since there is no internal circulation it will be necessary for vehicles to back out onto Luce Street. The parking proposal does not meet standard Code requirements for parking area layouts and concerns have been expressed to Staff from the community relative to the parking. He noted a letter which was distributed to the Commission, dated May 25, 1992, from Wendy West. Staff has monitored the parking and there are currently approximately 10 to 13 cars parking on Luce or on-site during the lunch hour. Staff believes tha~ the expansion and the service is very appropriate, however, may be over building at this location. An attempt was made by Staff, as well as the applicant, to find alternative sites for the project without success. Staff believes the need for the facility outweighs any adverse affects and recommends approval of both the use permit and the variance subject to the findings and conditions. He further advised that the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact must be found to be adequate and complete by the Commission. Commissioner Reid explained that he had received a phone call at work from a woman who invited him to see the site and she also had MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 4 MAY 27, 1992 asked him how he was going to vote on the project. He advised her that he had already visited the site and offered no comment on his feelings concerning the project. Commissioner Randolph noted that he works with Families United and has eaten at Plowshares with his clients many times and feels it is a very necessary use. He expressed concern that the expansion exceeds 26% of the existing floor space and is not appropriate when there is insufficient parking, especially in light of the expanded hours. He noted concern over vehicles backing out of the parcel during the evening hours. He questioned whether a driveway around the building could be accommodated. Commissioner Long noted that the hours of operation in the Staff Report and Negative .Declaration of Environmental Impact were inconsistent and clarified that the correct hours would be 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Discussion followed concerning the feasibility of a circular driveway around the building and alternatives for other parking plans. Commissioner Randolph explained that there is a 300 to 400 square foot general activity area included in the proposal. He mentioned that when he toured the facility it was noted that a possible medical-type clinic might be conducted in the room. He noted this could create an intense use. Planning Director Harris advised that he was not aware of that proposal. Commissioner Long noted that he does not feel the parking will be increased by the project because clients will be on the site by appointment only. He explained that the Code does not adequately address this type of need. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 7: 49 p.m. Richard Rockwell, no permanent address, advised that Plowshares has helped him in the past and the shower and laundry facilities will help many persons, especially families with children. He noted that people will be able to get cleaned up, look for a Job, and go to school. Alan Sieber, 180 Luce Avenue, neighbor to the west of Plowshares, advised that he never received notice in the mail of the public hearing and wondered how many other affected persons did not know about the meeting. He noted that he has never had a problem with Plowshares during lunch hour, however, if he or his wife go home for lunch there are no parking spaces available on the street. There was an assurance in 1984 that the hours would not change, and MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 5 MAY 27, 1992 now that they are going to change it makes him leery about accepting the validity of further assurances. He does not want to be awakened at 6:00 a.m.' by persons using the facility on the weekend. He noted that the homeless population is increasing which will increase usage of the facility. He feels that adding the laundry room and showers will bring in additional homeless persons who don't live in the area presently. He noted that backing out onto Luce is dangerous. He does not like the idea of the U-shaped circulation pattern either as it will increase the traffic going by his house. He noted that he has lived in the house approximately one year. He does not like the idea of the facility being used seven days a week. Discussion followed concerning the parking situation. It was noted that Mr. Sieber has not had a problem with cars blocking his driveway. Planning Director Harris determined that Mr. Sieber had only owned the property approximately one month which is why he did not receive a notice. The notices go to the property owner of record using the last assessor's role. Susan Sieber, 180 Luce Avenue, noted that the fact that the applicant and Staff have looked for alternative sites for this use indicates they know the use is not appropriate for this location. She noted that no one knows for sure what will happen with the expansion. Discussion followed concerning the reasons for looking for alternative sites, one being the need to accommodate more parking. Sister Jane Kelly, 991 South Dora, representing Plowshares, explained this project. She explained the current operation and noted that the laundry and shower facilities will be handled by appointment only. They chose the hours they are requesting becaus~ they do not presently know when people will want to take showers and they do not want to get locked into hours that will not work. There will always be a staff member and volunteer at the site so there will be two cars on site, plus maybe one for homeless persons. The request for extended hours is so Plowshares does not need a new variance every time their needs change. They do not anticipate using the facility seven days a week. She noted that she felt the circular driveway would not be appropriate. Discussion followed concerning whether the Buddhist facility would be appropriate for this type of use. Sister Jane advised that there is a corridor for homeless persons in the area taking in Mental Health, the Community Center, Social Services, Plowshares, and the Food Bank. If a facility is too far outside that corridor the needy could not use the services. She MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 6 MAY 27, 1992 explained that they also wish to be. able to provide haircuts for persons on the site. Discussion followed concerning the hours of operation. It was noted that Plowshares may be able to serve four single persons at a time, or a family of five, in the shower and laundry facilities. A family would be allowed I 1/2 hours to shower and do laundry. There will not be a conflict between the showering and luncheon service. The appointments will be made on a referral basis, and only with the Community Center, Social Services, Health Department, Plowshares, Ford Street, or Regional Center. Sister Jane advised that it would not be appropriate to reduce the size of the addition. They are trying to make the showers of such a size that a child may be showered with his/her mother. She does not feel this operation will increase the need for additional parking and Plowshares will be sensitive to the hours of operation and noise generated. Discussion followed concerning controlling the appointments so that there is no loitering or parking problems. It was noted that Plowshares has a long-term five-year lease with first option to buy at this location. The only other facility of this type in town is Ford Street and those showers can only be used at night. Sister Jane advised that she does not feel this will bring additional homeless persons to Ukiah when Santa Rosa has a drop-in center which is much more convenient. Alan Sieber questioned whether Sister Jane gave assurances in 1984 that the dining room would be the end of their project. Sister Jane answered that in 1984 Plowshares needed the dining room and that is what they applied for, and they have complied with all the conditions of that use permit. Alan Sieber noted that he never heard anything about a barber shop or medical facility at this location before the meeting. Sister Jane advised that Plowshares is trying to establish a personal care facility where persons can get cleaned up and look for a Job. A1 Bellon, 195 Calvert Court, advised that he is on the Board of Directors of Plowshares and indicated that he was the person who toured the facility with Commissioner Randolph. He explained that when Mr. Randolph questioned what'the use of the general purpose room would be, he mentioned a few things which the Board had discussed. Concerning the medical idea, it was discussed casually by the Board once or twice that a doctor may come in the noon hour once a month or annually and if any guests had questions or needed MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE ? MAY 27, 1992 medical advise it could be given to them. medical procedures actually performed. There would be no Leland Kraemer, 1990 Vichy Springs Road, advised that he was representing Ina Mae Phillip and Dora Thompson, neighbors to the east of Plowshares. He distributed copies of a letter which explained in detail the items he wished to discuss. He explained it is hard to criticize · plan that is deeply seated in the needs of the community and he is very much in favor of the objectives. However, the rights of all property owners need to be considered. He gave a brief history of the neighborhood and explained that even though the tenants were concerned over the impact this project might have in 1984, they wanted to be sympathetic to the needs and try to be good neighbors. However, there have been problems associated with the project. He distributed pictures taken at Plowshares in the past couple weeks which show loitering and parking problems in the neighborhood. He noted that the decision the Commission makes regarding this use will impact the neighborhood for the next 50 years. The facility is in the wrong location. He advised that when the original use permit was granted in 1984, it was determined to be a "public building," however, Plowshares does not fit the definition of a "public building." The neighbors do not want Plowshares to leave but they do not want further expansion. He further explained that this is an R-1 zone, what condemnation entails and when a property owner loses enough of their property rights their property has been taken away whether or not title still remained in their name. The whole community is benefitting from this service and these neighbors are paying the price. He feels the parking issue has not been adequately addressed in the Negative Declaration. There are odors coming from the trash area, and litter is created by the use. He reiterated that the neighbors are opposed to the addition and extended service hours. Discussion followed concerning the location of the trash dumpster and how it is that the neighbors on the west side can have no problems with Plowshares yet the neighbors on the east do. Susan Sieber explained that she and her husband, the neighbors to the west, work during the day and Plowshares' current hours, unless they are home during lunch, do not affect them. Alan Sieber indicated that the wind blows to the east so they will not. get the odor from the trash dumpster. Anne Molgaard, 1201 West Clay, representing Redwood Legal Assistance, noted that she is a community mediator and an attorney. Redwood Legal Assistance provides legal services to low-income residents in Mendocino County. They applaud Plowshares' innovative personal care project and encourage the Commission to support the project. Regarding the concerns of the neighbors, she recommends MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 8 MAY 27, 1992 mediation to provide ideas to help Plowshares communicate better with their neighbors. There are many ways to solve the parking and trash problems and would encourage the Planning Commission to think about all the different solutions that can be achieved. The personal care facility is an investment in the homeless community and is very much needed. Commissioner Hoppe questioned whether Ms. Nolgaard was offering her assistance and Ms. Molgaard indicated she was willing to work with the applicant and neighbors. Richard Rockwell requested to see the pictures that were distribut- ed. He noted that one of the pictures showing loitering outside of Plowshares was of himself and apologized for any inconvenience caused by his being there. He explained that his hip and back were out that day. Also, some days it is hard to get to the site at Just the right time. He volunteered to clean up any debris left after lunch is served until such a time as he begins school. Martin Bradley, I Lorraine Street, advised that he has been involved with Plowshares since it began and noted Plowshares is willing to work with the neighbors. They need to know what the problems are and they will remedy any situations that erupt. He explained that they have kept their agreements and assurances by not violating their use permit and returning to the Planning Commission whenever they want to deviate from the use permit. Chairman Fart noted that the on-site landscaping is in disrepair. Mr. Bradley advised that the landscaping was discussed at the last Board meeting and they are presently securing bids for a landscape service. Discussion followed concerning the liability involved in having clients help them with landscaping. Richard Ober, 261 Irvington, speaking as Minister of the First Christian Church and President of the Ministerial Association, explained that it seems to be a well thought out project. He felt the lunch is being handled quite successfully and feels that taking appointments for the showers will work to control loitering. He feels this will serve a need in the co~munity. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 9:06 p.m. Recess - 9:06 p.m. Reconvened - 9:16 p.m. Commissioner Reid questioned the appropriateness of continuing the public hearing until such time as the mediator can meet with Plowshares and the neighbors to discuss their concerns. Chairman Fart stated that he hoped the concerns would have been handled prior to the public hearing. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 9 MAY 27, 1992 Commissioner Hoppe noted that since the problems are with the past use permit, postponing a decision on the current application would not be appropriate. Commissioner Long also felt that the project should be voted on. He would also like to see the mediation take place, however, not as a condition of the application but as the community trying to work together. Chairman Fart noted that he feels Plowshares has reached their limitation as far as use at this site. Up to this point all the compromises have been from the surrounding neighbors and it is time for Plowshares to make some compromises. Commissioner Burke did not feel that the problems presented were insurmountable. The two parties can get together and work their problems out. ON ]~ MOTION by Commissioner Burke, seconded by Commissioner Long, it was carried by the following roll call vote to find the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact adequate and complete: Commissioner Reid noted that on Page 2 of the Negative Declaration, under Section 2, the creation of objectionable odors should be marked "yes." Under Item 6 on Page 3, he felt there is a noise concern as people will be at the site longer. Also, in one of the letters received there was a concern over profanity. Chairman Fart noted that the Negative Declaration is not addressing the current use but the proposed pro~ect. Discussion followed. Commissioner Randolph noted that he agreed with Commissioner Reid in that there will be a cumulative effect from the expansion of the use. He feels the light glare will be an issue during the fall and spring months, primarily on the neighbors to the east. There will also be increased noise. Also, regarding items "b" and "f" on page 4, there is going to be increased parking and internal circulation problems with this application. Commissioner Long noted that this is a petition to begin a new program that in reality will have no impact upon the existing program. The most important impact will be noise of persons coming in at 6:00 a.m. AYES: Commissioners Burke, Hoppe, Long, and Chairman Fart. NOES: Commissioners Randolph and Reid. ABSENT: Commissioner Sandelin. ABSTAIN: None. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 10 MAY 27, 1992 ON A MOTION by Commissioner Reid, seconded by Commissioner Long, it was carried by the following roll call vote to approve Variance Application No. 92-24, based on the following findings: · · · The parcel is unique due to the existing layout of the building and relatively small size· It was originally approved for construction of a church and adequate parking was never made available. The proposal is not a grant of special privilege due to the previous uses of the building as a church and then a school, both at given times, high traffic producing uses. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety. Chairman Fart advised that he does not feel that Finding No. i is valid· He also has trouble with the parking arrangement as drawn and feels that it will be a hazard to public health and safety. Commissioner Randolph noted he did not agree with the findings primarily because they are expanding the hours of operation. He also has concerns relative to traffic backing out onto Luce Street. Commissioner Hoppe noted that even though there are problems with the project she feels the use outweighs the potential problems. Chairman Fart added that the Code does not represent what the parking requirement should be for this type of use but he still has trouble ignoring the Codes that are in place. Commissioner Randolph questioned what would happen if this parcel were to change hands and a restaurant went in at this location. Planning Director Harris advised that though the variance runs with the land it would go with the use on that land also. If it were a different use there would be different requirements that would need to be met. A restaurant would not be allowed by right in the R-1 zone. AYES: Commissioners Burke, Hoppe, Long, and Reid. NOES: Commissioner Randolph and Chairman Fart. ABSENT: Commissioner Sandelin. ABSTAIN: None. ON A MOTION by Commissioner Reid, seconded by Commissioner Burke, it was carried by the following roll call vote to approve Use Permit Application No. 92-20, subject to the following conditions: · · All applicable conditions of Use Permit No. 85-12 remain in effect. Standard Conditions 1-23. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 11 MAY 27, 1992 A-lc, · . . 0 . Use of the laundry and shower facilities be by appointment only with a member of staff present on the premises at all times such operation is functioning. On-site parking spaces be paved and striped to City Code specifications· A new six-foot solid-wood fence be constructed along the west property line, nort/l of the 20-foot setback point to replace the existing three foot fence and provide a visual buffer to the new parking area to the approval of the Director of Planning. The two trees on the west front portion of the property be retained. The hours of operation will be 7=00 a.m. to 7=00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9=00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends. An alternate location for the trash dumpster be found to mitigate impact of odor to adjacent neighbors, and measures be taken to mitigate the odor by cleaning the dumpster more often. AYES= Commissioners Burke, Hoppe, Long, Randolph, Reid, and Chairman Fart. NOES= None. ABSENT: Commissioner Sandelin. ABSTAIN= None. FINAL BUBDIVISIONMAP A. Final Subdivision Ma~ No. 90-30. Brookside Estatss Subdivi- Planning Associate Yarbrough advised that this is a 5.5 acre subdivision consisting of 33 lots; 26 single family dwelling lots, 4 duplex lots, i tri-plex lot, and two remaining lots which are not proposed for development. The Tentative Map was approved by the City Council in September, 1990. Both the Engineering Department and Planning Department have reviewed the Map and find it in compliance with the approved Tentative Map. Staff recommends approval of the Brookside Estates Final Subdivision Map. Chairman Fart noted that the lot dimension of Lot 4 on the Tentative Map was 50 feet wide at one end and 50 feet wide at the other; however, on the Final Map it is 50 feet wide on one end and 47.16 feet on the other end. He questioned, for the record, whether this falls within the limits for consistency. Planning Director Harris indicated'that from a Staff perspective it would be considered consistent. Commissioner Reid indicated that the Tentative Map had an access between Lots 30 and 31 to Robinson Lane. At that time, Mr. Mayfield indicated that he was going to incorporate the lots MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 12 MAY 27, 1992 met at that time. Commissioner Long inquired regarding the time limit for finalizing a building permit· Mr. Harris explained that the Building Permit is valid for six months, with a six month extension, for total of one year, if construction is abandoned. Otherwise, the building permit is effective so long as construction continues on the project. He read Condition No. 2 to the Commission, PUBLIC HEARING OPENED- 7:15 P.M. Commissioner Randolph inquired of the applicant if geological studies had been conducted on the subject property. John Lazaro, 624 Joseph Street, applicant, advised geological studies had been conducted and George Rau has engineered the retaining walls. Commissioner Randolph inquired of the applicant if the conditions could be completed for his project. Mr. Lazaro advised he plans to move ahead with the project and felt he would be able to complete his project within the extended time period. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 7:17 P.M. ON A MOTION by Commissioner Reid, seconded by Commissioner Long, it was carried by the following roll call vote, to approve extension of Use Permit Application 91-20, as filed by John L. Lazaro, with the following supplemental conditions: · . The Planning Commission will not grant additional time extensions to Use Permit Application No. 91-20. Working drawings for building permit application be submitted to the Building Division by October 28, 1993. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Chairman Burke. None. None. None. Farr, Hoppe~ Long, · Menton, Randolph, Reid, and Be Amendment to Use Permit Ar)r~llcaflon No. 92-20. 8s filed by Plowshares. to _ . allow the servina of meals on Saturdays and Sundays, located at 150 Luca -- · Street, Assetsor's Parcel No. 003-072-05. in the R-1. Slnale Family Residential -- MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 4 APRIL 14, 1993 zonina district. Associate Planner Noel Ibalio explained Plowshares is requesting to amend Use Permit No 92-20 to include food service on Saturday and Sunday. The applicant originally applied for a Use Permit to allow for a multi-purpose community room serving free meals to people in need, kitchen and pantry facilities to prepare and serve food, and administrative office space for community emergency relief programs and counseling. The application also included a Variance to reduce parking from 22 spaces to eight spaces and to increase the sign area.. On September 26, 1984 the Planning Commission approved the Use Permit and Variance to the parking, but denied the Variance request to increase the sign area. A condition of the Use Permit restricted the service of food to 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. On May 27, 1992, the Planning Commission approved the applicant's request to modify the original Use Permit to include a building addition containing showers, laundry facilities, and an office area. Use of these facilities was allowed each day of the week. The applicant.is now requesting to modify the Use Permit to include food service (lunch only) on Saturday and Sunday from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. He advised that the significant issues of this project are parking and consistency with existing and anticipated uses. Parking in the neighborhood consists of on-street and garage/driveway spaces. An inventory of on-street parking in the neighborhood indicated 11 available on-street parking spaces. He discussed surrounding commercial uses being closed on weekends, thereby making available an ample number of on- street parking spaces. The weekend staff at Plowshares will consist of four volunteers and one staff person. Plowshares will need five parking spaces for volunteers and staff. As indicated in the parking survey, there are on-street parking spaces in the area which can accommodate clients. Staff does not anticipate a change in use of designation in the neighborhood. Staff believes the proposed change to the Use Permit to include food service (lunch only) on Saturday and Sunday is consistent with the existing use and will not increase the current impacts to the neighborhood though the operation will be seven days a week. Commissioner Reid advised that Schuler's Surplus Sales, located at the corner of South State Street and Luce Avenue, is open on Saturday's. Commissioner Randolph inquired if Staff has conducted research of possible other sites in which the proposed use Would be more applicable. He discussed the application last year to allow shower and laundry facilities on site. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 5 APRIL 14, 1993 Discussion followed concerning the existing hours of operation: laundry Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends; serving of meals from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Commissioner Hoppe discussed Plowshares' request heard by the Planning Commission in May 1992. At that time, there were complaints from neighbors concerning the trash facilities and with clients parking in neighbors driveways, and it was agreed that the applicant and neighbors would work together to address their concerns. In addition, Redwood Legal Assistance would provide mediation services to help Plowshares communicate better with their neighbors. Chairman Burke Inquired of staff the number of complaints received by the City concerning the facility since the last Commission meeting in May 1992. Mr. Ibalio responded that no telephone complaints have been received, however, two letters have been received in opposition to the current proposal. Commissioner Farr inquired of the peak parking capacity of the facility on weekends. Mr. Ibalio responded that the capacity would be consistent with the weekday parking capacity. The City does not have control over the number of clients that frequent the facility. Chairman Burke advised that when the Variance was approved in 1984, there were 22 seats required. Mr. Harris noted the parking requirement was increased to 27 with the laundry facility but a variance for the additional five spaces was granted in 1992. Commissioner Farr discussed the parking spaces available and was unsure if they were substantiated in the Staff Report. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED- 7:40 P.M. Sister Jane Kelly, 991 South Dora, advised she represents the Plowshares Board and is requesting to amend their Use Permit to allow the sewing of meals on Saturday and Sunday. The request does not entail any addition to the building site. She explained that Plowshares is the only place where homeless and poor people can receive free a hot meal and fel. t it presents a hardship on the poor when they have to go two days a week without a meal. She noted that on the weekends more children would be attending. The majority of people who participate in the free meals program either walk, use bikes, or are in wheelchairs. Most are too poor to own a car. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 6 APRIL 14, 1993 She anticipated 11:15 a.m. as the earliest time that people would arrive for meals and they would be gone by 1:00 p.m. She did not feel that noise would be a factor in the community dining room. She felt the facility is closer to the commercial buildings on State Street than it is to the residential neighborhood. She advised that Plowshares bull! a fence with their neighbors approval and have not had complaints from neighbors in the aree. They try to be good neighbors and feel they have met all of the conditions of their Use Permit. She explained there is a strong need for meals for families and children on the weekends. She noted churches cannot serve meals because they do not have the facilities and the community should be able to provide food to the poor and homeless. Chairman Burke questioned Sister Jane concerning any complaints they have received since their last appearance before the Planning Commission. Sister Jane explained they have been making an effort to monitor the driveways and inform their clients to keep the driveways clear for their neighbors. The letter received by the City from Susan Seiber, 180 Luce Avenue, addressing problems she has experienced with Plowshares in the neighborhood, came as a surprise to her. Commissioner Randolph explained he is familiar with the Plowshare facility and inquired if Plowshares has looked at other sites to serve meals on the weekends. Sister Jane explained they have inquired with the churches in the area, but they do not have kitchen facilities available. They have explored other options to no avail. Commissioner Randolph questioned Sister Jane concerning the use of school cafeteria facilities on the weekends. Sister Jane explained they did not explore the option of using school facilities because most schools are being used for sports activities on the weekends. Commissioner Reid noted that, although sports activities do occur on weekends at some schools, the kitchen facilities are not always in use. He inquired concerning their area of activity in Uklah and discussed the potential of using church facilities on a rotating basis. Sister Jane explained that every church does not have the facilities to open their doors to the homeless and hungry on the weekends and felt, even if that was feasible, it did not make sense to hop-scotch to other facilities if those in need know Plowshares exists seven days a week. · o Commissioner Long explained he would like to separate the need to take care of the MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 7 APRIL 14, 1993 homeless from religion, and felt it ia the community's social responsibility to address the needs of the homeless. Commissioner Farr inquired as to what organizations make up the Inter-Faith Network. Sister Jane explained there are approximately eight churches in the Ukiah area committed to feeding the homeless and poor on Saturday and Sunday once a month. They have asked Plowshares, as a logical choice, to request an amendment of their Use Permit to serve meals on weekends since they are already established and known by those in need of these services. She explained it would be a hardship on the poor to go to different locations for meals each week and that Plowshares is in a central location. Diane Anastasia, Director of Plowshares, discussed their recent letter to Bob Sawyer of the City of Ukiah Planning Division concerning their suggestion that the Plowshares site be given a new land use designation as well as zoning classification. She noted the Plowshares building has never been a residence but still it is zoned residential. She discussed the surrounding land uses. Plowshares has support of a Community Development Block Grant and they will be included in a grant to fund a weekend meal program. The weekend meal program will help the Inter-Faith Network to fund the new food service which is not just linked to the Plowshares site. With regard to parking problems, she noted that if one curb could be painted red it would solve some of the parking problems. Commissioner Randolph asked Ms. Anastasia whether grant funding, approved in the weekend feedingprogram, would apply to other sites. Ms. Anastasia replied that her understanding was that it would apply to other sites. Mr. Harris explained that the correspondence received from Plowshares will be considered when the General Plan Land Use Element is reviewed. Kevin Murphy, 813 Maple Street, spoke in support of Plowshares' request. He felt the Inter-Faith Network is in a difficult situation and would like to see something done to make the program work for the community. Perhaps if painting a curb red in the neighborhood could be initiated, that would help alleviate some of the 'parking problems. John Durkin, 345 No. Main St., Space #6, spoke in support of the project, noting there is a lot of poverty in Ukiah and it is a relief to not go hungry on Saturday and Sunday. Claude Phillips, homeless, spoke in support of the project. He explained he tried to MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 8 APRIL 14, 1993 go to the Ford Street Project but, because he uses · wheelchair, he could not get up the stairs. RECESS - 8:00 P.M. RECONVENED - 8:08 P.M. Alan Seiber, 180 Luce Avenue, advised he lives directly west of Plowshares. He explained that churches know their schedule weeks in advance and it could be posted at Plowshares so people would know where and when the meals will be served. He discussed the problems he has had with people parking in his driveway and he has called Plowshares to take care of the matter, which they did at the time. The parking problem has been better during the past two weeks, however, prior to that his driveway was blocked quite frequently. He expressed concern that, if Plowshares' request is approved, they will revert back to the previous situation of blocking driveways again. He discussed the need to red curb an area between his driveway and the Plowshares building end discussed driveways in the surrounding area being blocked occasionally. Commissioner Hoppe Inquired if Mr. Seiber had experienced any other problems besides parking. Mr. Seiber explained there has been an Increase in trash on the sidewalk and in neighboring yards. Plowshares has taken care of their trash containers so as not to emit odors, however, some people who frequent Plowshares, litter the area with cigarette butts, discarded cups and wrappers on the sidewalk. He felt it would be better for the neighborhood if Plowshares found an alternate site to expand their services. Commissioner Menton requested clarification on Mr. Seiber's term 'alternative'. Mr. Seiber explained an alternative to Plowshares serving meals seven days a week would be to have the churches participate on weekends. The church schedule could be posted at Plowshares to keep everyone Informed. He felt walking to another site would not be too much to ask. Eveylin Emery, 175 Luce Avenue, advised she lives across the street from Plowshares and parking has been bad in the area. She explained she takes pride in her property and felt her property value is declining with each request Plowshares has made to the Planning Commission~ She felt she is a nice neighbor but is tired of people dropping trash in front of her house. She advised that the Plowshares site is being used to counsel AIDS patients and used as a clinic, noting that frequently people are still in the building at 10:30 p.m. · MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 14, 1993 PAGE 9 Chairman Burke questioned Ms. Emery concerning people leaving the dining hall and littering her yard. In addition, he Inquired about the building being occupied in the evening. Ms. Emery explained that those leaving the dining hall litter her front yard and reiterated that people have stayed until 10:30 p.m. in the building. She noted that she-attended the first meeting when Plowshares applied for the Use Permit. Commissioner Hoppe explained there were various complaints from neighbors at the last meeting concerning Plowshares in 1992. She Inquired if an on going process has been in effect to have the complaints been resolved. Alan Seiber read from the September 26, 1984 Planning Commission meeting, 'ON A MOTION by Commissioner Mastin, seconded by Commissioner Knutson, it was carried by the following roll call vote to approve Use Permit No. 85-12 with the following conditions: 3. The entire parcel be landscaped and irrigated by an automated irrigation system and maintained in a neat weed free manner." He noted Plowshares grounds are not in good condition and they have not installed an irrigation system. Susan Seiber, 180 Luce, advised she is angry that a letter she sent to the City concerning Plowshares was published in the Ukiah Daily Journal without her permission. No one from Plowshares has talked to her since the last meeting in 1992. She expressed concern that Plowshares cooperates with neighbors prior to their requests before the Planning Commission, then after approval activities are back to normal. She was not aware that neighbors could complain to the City about conditions in their neighborhood. She advised that her church has signed up with the Inter-Faith Network to provide services to the homeless and poor, including children, and if these people don't get fed at Plowshares, they will be served somewhere else by another participating facility. Ralph Emery, 950 No. State Street, explained that all schools do not feed children on weekends when they have sporting tournaments. He discussed other facilities that may be available such as the Community Center, Senior Citizens Center, the Club House at the park, and other churches in the area. During the weekdays, most people in the neighborhood work, but during the weekend they want to enjoy their neighborhood and not be impacted by parking congestion. He noted that during the weekend it is difficult for visitors to find on-street parking. He discussed the limited parking spaces in the area and problems with people speeding. He was not opposed to feeding the homeless but felt it was an inappropriate location. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 10 APRIL 14, 1993 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 8:30 P.M. Commissioner Randolph advised that Plowshares contributes a vital service to the community and should be community oriented. However, they should have consideration for their neighbors who lived there prior to their arrival. He stressed the importance of protecting the Integrity of the neighborhood. As noted by audience participation, other alternative facilities are available in the community. A MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Randolph, seconded by Commissioner Farr, to deny amended Use Permit 92-20, as requested by Plowshares, to include serving meals on Saturdays and Sundays. Discussion followed. Commissioner Long discussed the.discomfort of residents in the neighborhood feeling that their rights are being invaded. He discussed street parking. He disagreed that there are alternative sites available, noting that food is provided by local stores and has the community approval. He felt it is not the church's responsibility but rather the community's responsibility to feed the poor. Plowshares is a community effort to feed the hungry. He felt the community has the responsibility to feed the poor, not the churches. He explained that the community resource (Plowshares) infringes on residents comfort but it was society's responsibility to correct the problem. Commissioner Reid agreed that feeding the poor and homeless is important but felt the people residing on Luce Avenue are the ones who are impacted the most. He noted we all care about the homeless situation but do not share the problems of the residents on Luce Avenue. Perhaps Plowshares has reached its capacity for services at this location and felt the residents in the area have reached their capacity for tolerance of the on-going parking problem. Commissioner Farr discussed the Inter-Faith Network desire to have Plowshares perform the meal services tO the homeless, rather than each church participating at their own sites. He felt the services should be spread to the churches as well to share the impacts and use. If the Planning Commission does not approve the Use Permit request, the Commission will not be standing in the way of starving children being fed as other alternatives.to the project are available. Commissioner Menton discussed the community's responsibility to take care of the homeless and poor. He felt there is a facility in place (Plowshares) which is a beacon for the needy. It could be an inconvenience to the homeless and poor to go to another location for meals and felt the existing facility could be used on weekends for a few hours each day. Those in charge of operating the facility need to take the initiative relative to parking, litter control, etc. to ensure their services and clients do not adversely impact the neighborhood. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 11 APRIL 14, 1993 Commissioner Hoppe felt this was a difficult decision for her. Plowshares is a community wide service but is impacting a small number of residents in its vicinity. It is unknown how severe the impacts are to the residents in the area and she felt Plowshares should be working with their neighbors to resolve problems. Plowshares should take the initiative and come to terms with the neighbors. Chairman Burke felt there is a great need for the services of Plowsl~ares and the impact they would have on the surrounding neighborhood would be minimal. ROLL CALL VOTE on the previous mot[on to deny Use Permit 92-20, Plowshares' request to include serving meals on Saturdays and Sundays was as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Farr,.Hoppe, Randolph, and Reid. Commissioners Long, Menton, and Chairman Burke. None. None. Ce Use Permit A;)~)licatlon No 92-70. as filed bv Robert Britton, to allow construction of a second residence on 0rooerty located at 625 Grove Avenue Assessor's Parcel No. 001-112-03. in the R-1. Sinale Family Residential zoning_ Associate Planner Noel Ibalio explained the applicant proposes to utilize an existing unit as a second residence on the property located at 625 Grove Avenue and build a. new larger unit in the front portion of the property. The existing residence is located to the rear of the property with access from an alley. The request was presented to the Planning Commission on December 9, 1992, continued to the January 13, 1993 meeting, and continued to the February 10, 1993, and to the April 14, 1993 meetings. At the February 10, 1993 meeting, the Planning Commission required the applicant to submit elevations, site plans, floor plans, and documentation regarding the property owner or relative on the deed. These items have been submitted for Planning Commission consideration. The policy issue remains whether an existing unit can be considered the second unit, thus allowing construction of a new larger unit on the lot. Staff retains its position that the property is eligible for a second unit since the existing living unit was constructed prior to 1983. Another significant item is the retention of the mature tree on the east side of the property. If the new unit is approved it should be conditioned that the tree be retained and maintained in a healthy condition. It is a design and neighborhood compatibility issue. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 12 APRIL 14, 1993 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 1995 TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Missing Pages from Agenda Summary for Plowshares Appeal The Planning Department was contacted by Mayor Schneiter this morning to inform us that the Minutes from the November 8, 1995, Planning Commission meeting that were attached to the Agenda Summary for the Plowshares Appeal were not complete. Staff checked the master copy for the packet that was sent to all council members last Friday and found that it was missing Pages 7 and 8 of the Minutes. Copies of these pages have been enclosed for your review and inclusion in your packet. Please accept our apologies for this oversight. If staff can be of further assistance, please contact Associate Planner Dave Lohse at 463-6207. Ms. Sieber stated she feels that every year they are back fighting for the same thing, and she feared the issue will escalate so that the 3 days will extend to the entire year. Alan Sieber, 180 Luce Avenue, brought forth for the Commissioners' perusal a police report listing the calls and years of occurrence for that area. He pointed out that this year 11 of the 15 calls were directly for Plowshares. It appears that as the number of people that Plowshares serves increases, the more trouble the neighborhood has. Chairman Ashiku commented it was the newly adopted policy of the Planning Conanission to photocopy items for the audience upon request. No one came forward with a request for the police report. Ms. Emery contradicted Ms. Brodsky's comments, stating there were people unloading laundry and dogs running around her yard all day long. To say no one is there after 1:00 p.m. is untrue. Mr. Sieber submitted photographs of the area taken the previous Monday at 12:15 p.m. There are no cars showing on the weekend, but there are parked cars which interfere with access to his driveway during the week. The previous Minutes show the curb was supposed to be redlined for "No Parking", but nothing has been done. · , Marvin Boesel, 185 Mae Street, stated he does not live in the area, but that he does donate to senior citizens and Plowshares through his employment. He is not in favor of increasing the number of hours Plowshares operates, as it does decrease the property values. He commented that a property owner in the area had a difficult tirm selling his house, and was forced to drop the value. The amount of traffic is also a problem. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:28 p.m. Commissioner Pruden stated she is a strong supporter of Plowshares both financially and in-kind. She also sat through the entire hearing process in 1993 dealing with the use permit. She took the opportunity to eat lunch there earlier in the day, and noted that across the street there were a number of dogs tied up which the clients were feeding. While she acknowledged the operation is well run, she sees no need to amend the use permit at this point. She further stated she is grateful she does not have this facility next door to her. While she approves of Plowshares, she also realizes it is a great burden to the neighborhood. The previous Planning Commission came to the proper conclusion. Commissioner Larson stated this is a difficult decision for him, since he believes Plowshares is a valuable asset to the community and is doing the best they can under the circumstances. He is sitting on the Planning Commission because he went to bat for his neighborhood and its impacts. He feels strongly about the quality of life in the City's residential areas, and is of the opinion that certain projects threaten that quality of life. While he thinks Plowshares is a wonderful thing, he believes it MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 November 8, 1995 to be in the wrong location. Because of what Plowshares does, they compromised good planning principles to bring the service to the community. He cannot support the project. Chairman Ashiku stated he was disappointed this amendment would not be passed. Three additional days in an entire year is a small price to pay; it is inconsequential compared to the benefit of the services. ON A MOTION by Commissioner Pruden, seconded by Commissioner Larson, it was carried by the following roll call vote, to deny Use Permit Amendment Application No. 95-48, as filed by Plowshares, to allow the modification of Special Condition No. 7 for Use Permit No. 92-20 to permit the operation of the dining room at the Plowshares facility on specific weekend days during the year. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Larson and Pruden Chairman Ashiku None Commissioners Baker and Smith Chairman Ashiku notified the applicant of the denial of the request, and advised they have until November 18, 1995 to file an appeal. 6B. Use Permit Application No. 95-44, as filed by Jamie Williams, dba the Car Company, to allow a used car lot on a portion of a narcel located in the C-?~ (.Highway Commercial and Restricted Industrial) Zo~ine District, on property located at 1280 and 1290 South State Street (.Assessor P~rcel No. 003-540-30}, Associate Planner David Lohse advised approval of this project would allow the establishment of a used car lot on the project site, which is located in the C-2 District. This car lot would be located on the southwest portion of an existing commercial site. The design of this project includes: A 3,500 sq.fi, area that will be defined by a 15-foot setback area on the south and east sides and striped parking spaces on the west; Landscaped planter areas along the southern comers of the site; and A small office area attached to the nearby commercial structure to the northwest. The use of this area would also require that one of the existing 40-foot wide driveways along State Street be closed. Planning staff analyzed the project design and found that it complies with applicable use and development standards for the C-2 District. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 8 November 8, 1995 Ukiah City Council Ukiah City Hall 300 Seminary Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 817 N. Oak Street Ukiah, CA 95482 December 4, 1995 Dear City Council Members, Concerning Plowshares Use Application: I am a St. Mary's Catholic Church representative to the Ukiah Interfaith Network. I would like, first, to commend the Planning Commission for their conscientious work and the review process they go through. At their last meeting, they turned down a Plowshares application to serve holiday meals on certain weekends. Two years ago they also turned down an application of the Interfaith Network to use Plowshares facilities to serve lunches on weekends. Both refusals were because of opposition from a couple of neighbors. Both times the commission felt they were acting on behalf of the rights of community members. .. I would like you, as city council members, to look at the other side of the coin. There are people out there who are citizens, who have urgent needs. They or their needs will not go away and their numbers are increasing. Churches and caring individuals are doing what we can to help. But you as representatives of the city also have a responsibility for these people. You can not just refuse our every application for use permits without helping us work out some suitable way to meet the needs. As for the Plowshares application, I feel it's implementation would have minimal impact and should be granted. Thank you. Jim Werner AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. 9a DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1995 REPORT SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO PURCHASE NEW CAT 627F, SELF- LOADING, AUGER SCRAPER FOR EARTHWORK OPERATIONS AT THE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL SYNOPSIS The following is a recommendation to purchase a new CAT 627F, Self-loading, Auger Scraper in-lieu of a used CAT 627 Scraper for earthwork operations at the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill. It has been confirmed that the current service provider will not be available for hire after April 1, 1996 and the available sources with the type of Scraper needed at the unit hourly rate we are accustomed to paying is void. Two (2) bids were received this year with one of the bids being a no bid. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Adopt Resolution authorizing the purchase of a CAT 627F, Self-loading, Auger Scaper and authorizing the Mayor, Director of Finance, and City Attorney to execute the necessary lease and financing documents. 2. Authorize a full-time position of Scraper Operator at Range 38 for the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill. 3. Authorize transfer of $59,074 from the Gas Collection Project line item for Scraper operational expenses. Acct. No.: 660-7301-250 $59,074 Acct. No.: 660-3401-250 $65,697 ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: informatiofi. Return matter to Staff for further Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Rick H. Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Prepared by: Rick H. Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Coordinated with: Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Candace Horsley, City Manager Authorizing Resolution. Hourly Operational Cost for New CAT 627F Scraper with Auger. Life Cycle Cost over Four Year Period. Estimate of Funds needed to Operate City-Owned Scraper for Balance of 1995/96 Fiscal Year. 5. Cost Comparison Report of In-House Ownership and operation vs. Contractural Services for Scraper and Operator. 6. Product Literature. 7. Quotation from Peterson Tractor. 8. Extended Warranty. 9. Amortization Schedule. 10. Governmental Lease Purchase Documents. APPROVE .I~~ ~9~',~o~h~ -~L_, Candace Horsley, City ~,anager Consideration of Recommendation to Purchase New CAT 627F, Self-Loading Auger Scraper for Earthwork Operations at the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill January 6, 1996 Page 2 It is believed that the acquisition of a new CAT 627F Auger Scraper under the terms described in this report with a repair and maintenance service agreement and guaranteed buyback is the best option to ownership with the least amount of risk associated with equipment failure and breakdown. This recommendation is based on the assumption that the landfill will remain open until October 1999 and that project which is necessary to maximize landfill life (raise transmission lines) and those environmental projects required by regulatory agencies will be funded. REPORT On September 6, 1995, the Public Works Department presented its recommendation that the City award a service contract for the furnishing of a scraper and operator for earthwork purposes at the landfill to Wipf Construction Company and presented a cost comparison report of in-house scraper ownership and operation versus the same service provided under a contractual basis. Although the City had received only two bids for providing the scraper services of which one was a no bid, Staff had recommended that the scraper and operator be provided under a contractual basis for reasons of minimizing risk related to unknown repair costs associated with used scrapers. This recommendation was tempered, however, due to recent information that the service provider recommended for selection would not be available for continuing the service for the coming 1996/97 fiscal year and due to the limited number of prospective service providers having a scraper which met the requirements needed at the landfill. Based on these concerns, Staff revised its recommendation regarding the award for the current year scraper services and suggested that equipment dealers be contacted for available used scrapers and financing terms or other acquisition options. The award for furnishing and operating a scraper was made to Wipf Construction with a termination date of April 1, 1996, in-lieu of the original recommended termination date of August 31, 1996. City Council directed Staff to submit for Council's review acquisition options prior to February, 1996. Having discussed various options with Peterson Tractor Company, a local caterpillar dealer, Staff is recommending that the City purchase a new CAT 627F, Self-Loading Auger Scraper for use at the landfill. The proposed purchase would be financed through Caterpillar Financial Services at the current annual interest rate of 5.9%. The purchase price of the scraper with the desired options is $514,284.13 and the total interest cost is $74,835.62 for a total cost of $589,119.75. Annual payments which are to be made at the beginning of the year are $92,203.55 with a balloon payment of $128,102 plus the last annual payment due at the beginning of the fifth year. Staff is also recommending that an extended power train warranty of $12,500 and a maintenance and service agreement at $13.86 per working scraper hour be acquired through Peterson Tractor in order to secure a guaranteed buy-back of $195,000 at the end of fifth year. The final payment of $220,305.55 (balloon plus annual) would be due soon Consideration of Recommendation to Purchase New CAT 627F, Self-Loading Auger Scraper for Earthwork Operations at the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill January 6, 1996 Page 3 after the closure of the landfill. The majority of this payment would be offset by the guaranteed buy-back. The repair and maintenance agreement would not include repairs caused by the lack of daily and weekly service maintenance by the City (lube and checks) or other repairs deemed to be outside normal wear or tear such as abuse, neglect or accident damage. Other items are excluded as indicated in the attached proposal. The CAT 627F Auger Scraper has been recommended because of its ability to load without the aid of a push/pull arrangement. This unit is somewhat new and no used units are available. This unit is currently in use at the Redding landfill, and the Public Works Superintendent and the Garage Supervisor visited the Redding landfill to observe this unit in action. Redding landfill personnel are very satisfied with the CAT 627F Auger Scraper. A video tape of this unit in use is available for review and it may be obtained from the Director of Public Works. Attached to this report is an estimated hourly cost of operation for the CAT 627F Auger Scraper with City provided operator. The equivalent hourly operational cost, assuming a yearly usage of 1100 hours, is $149.01. Since the Auger Scraper will not require the use of the D8 Dozer except for the occasional ripping of hard soil strata, a savings will result from less use of the dozer. The need for a 3/4 time dozer operator will also be eliminated. The hourly savings is estimated at $21.70 which results in an equivalent hourly operational cost of $127.31 for the Scraper. To facilitate the hiring of a qualified and experienced Scraper operator, it is necessary that this position be full-time with paid benefits even though the operator will not be utilized 100% on the Scraper. It is proposed that the operator be utilized for other heavy equipment duties such as operating a D6 to shape slopes and a replacement for other employees who are on vacation or sick leave. It is recommended that the Scraper operator position be assigned the 38 Salary Range with Step A at $2,274 per month and Step E at $2,763 per month. This salary amount includes the 1 percent increase that is effective on January 1, 1996. This Range is one range below that of the Landfill Supervisor and 3 ranges above that of the Heavy Equipment Operator. The hourly rate for Range 38 is $13.12 at Step A to $15.94 at Step E. Hourly cost to the City is approximately $18.57 per hour to $22.56 per hour based on a benefit package at 41.5 % of base salary. For estimation purposes it will be assumed that an experienced operator will start at Step B or $13.78 per hour or $19.50 per hour cost to City. The fixed personnel yearly cost at $19.50 per hour is $40,560 per year. However, the additional cost of labor to the landfill is the above cost minus the eliminated 3/4 part-time employee or $12,233 per year. If this additional labor cost is applied to the annual hourly usage of the Scraper (assumed to be 1100 hours) the equivalent hourly operational cost of $127.31 is increased to an effective hourly cost of $134.69. Consideration of Recommendation to Purchase New CAT 627F, Self-Loading Auger Scraper for Earthwork Operations at the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill January 6, 1996 Page 4 Also attached to this report is an estimated life cycle cost for a four (4) year period. This estimate includes fixed costs such as principal, interest, labor costs and variable items such as fuel and hourly maintenance and repair costs. The variable costs are based on an annual usage of 1100 hours or 4,400 hours over the life cycle period. The life cycle period cost less the anticipated savings from less usage of the D8 Dozer over the same time period is $605,337. The average yearly cost less savings is $151,334. For the fiscal 1995/96 year, $237,000 was budgeted for cover dirt production, miscellaneous slope grading, interim cover, and compaction, berm construction and sedimentation removal. As of December 1, $154,863 has been expended leaving a balance of $82,137. The majority of the cover dirt production and berm construction has ceased for the winter and should resume in March or April, weather permitting. However, an allowance of 120 hours or 15 working days should be set aside for pad construction during dry periods prior to April. The dollar amount of the set aside would be $16,440 leaving a balance of $65,697. Slope grading and sedimentation removal has been completed. As indicated in the attached estimate entitled "Estimate of Funds Needed to Operate City-Owned Scraper for Balance of 1995/96 Fiscal Year" there would be an estimated shortfall of $59,074 between the funds remaining in the landfill account for earthwork and funds needed to operate the Scraper for the balance of the year. This shortfall includes soft costs or allowances for future services and replacement items such as tires and parts subject to wear. As reported in the first quarter Expenditure Report (September 30, 1995), total quarter expenditures represented 20 percent of the budget expenditures and the first quarter revenue guideline reported that 32 percent of the budgeted revenue was received. Both of these positive trends could change drastically because of weather conditions or large expenditures not yet being posted. It may be too optimistic at this time to assume that we could fund the shortfall of $59,074 from a savings in expenditures or from a windfall in revenue. A possible fund source are the funds budgeted for the construction of a isolated gas collection system for that area of the landfill exceeding the maximum amount of methane gas at the landfill perimeter. It is noted that the gas limit is currently below maximum levels allowed, however, this condition could reverse itself during the rain season. Since there are no available funds elsewhere within the landfill budget, it is recommended that the shortfall be funded from monies budgeted for the Gas Collection Project (660-7301-250). It is believed that the acquisition of a new CAT 627F Auger Scraper under the terms described above with a repair and maintenance service agreement and guaranteed buy-back is the best option to ownership with the least amount of risk associated with equipment failure and breakdown. RK:kk R:I ~LANDFILL AAUGER 1 5 ? lO 20 2! 25 ~7 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF UKIAH AUTIIORIZING TIIE LEAS~PURCIIASE OF A CAT 627F SELF-LOADING, AUGER SCRAPER FROM PETERSON TRACTOR AND FINANCING WITH CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City has in the past relied on service providers for furnishing and operating a self-loading Scraper for earihwork purposes at Municipal Solid Waste Landfill; and WHEREAS, the current service provider has provided said Scraper services for the last four (4) years and this service provider will no longer be available to provide this service; and WHEREAS, there appears to be a lack of service providers who can provide an operated Scraper meeting the requirements and having the capabilities required at the landfill at a unit cost which the City is accustomed to paying; and WHEREAS, the Director of Fublic Works/City Engineer has submitted a recommendation that the City purchase a new CAT 627F, self-loading, Auger Scraper which can met the challenges at the landfill and at the same time produce savings in other landfill operations; and WHEREAS, the recommendation includes the acquisition of a Maintenance and Service Agreement with Peterson Tractor and an extended power-train warranty for the purpose of securing a guaranteed buy-back of $195,000; and WHEREAS, the recommendation presents the best option to ownership with the least amount of risk associated with equipment failure and breakdown; and WHEREAS, the recommended Scraper with Auger is from a single source manufacturer, and reasonable financing can be obtained from Caterpillar Financial Services 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Corporation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ukiah City Council that a lease purchase from Peterson Tractor for a CAT 627F, Self-Loading, Auger Scraper with options as presented in the recommendation and report in the amount of $514,284.13, and the purchase of an extended power-train warranty in the amount of $12,500 and the purchase of a Maintenance and Service Agreement from Peterson Tractor in the amount of $13.86 per running Scraper hour are hereby authorized. Financing with Caterpillar Financial Service Corporation for lease purchase with the following terms is authorized: 1. Interest rate at 5.9%, total interest expense of $74,835.62. 2. Amortization over five (5) years with annual principal and interest payments of $92,203.55 due at the beginning of the year and a balloon payment of $128,102 due with the fifth annual payment. The Mayor, Director of Finance and City Attorney are hereby authorized to execute all necessary purchase, financial and insurance documents to consummate the acquisition. PASSED AND ADOPTED this roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: day of , 1995, by the following ATTEST: Fred Schneiter Mayor City Clerk B:I/RESI CAT627F HOURLY OPERATIONAL COST FOR NEW 627F SCRAPER WITH AUGER Principal and Interest Total Cost at $589,119.75 Hours of Use at 1100 per Year for 4 Years = 4,400 Hours Less Buy-Back at $195,000 Extended Power Train Warranty at $12,500 Peterson Maintenance and Repair Program Excluded Maintenance Program Items Allowance Wear Items Insurance (Yearly Payment $3,545 or 1% of Average Equipment Value) Tire Replacement 1 Set $14,000 Tire Repair at 15% Fuel $0.90 per gallon - 13,750 gallon per year $12,375 per year divided by 1,100 hours Operator at $19.50 Equivalent Hourly Operational Cost SAVINGS IN LESS USE OF D8 DOZER Less 3/4 Part-Time Heavy Equipment Operator Less 50% Fuel Usage $80 per day at 2000 hours per Year equals $10 per hour Less Repair and Maintenance Cost to D8 Average yearly cost $11,000 or $7.03 per hour based on 1564 hours per year. Assume 25 % savings in repair costs TOTAL ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER HOUR Equivalent hourly cost CAT 627F Auger Scraper less savings $133.90 ($44.30) $ 2.85 $13.86 $ 5.00 $ 3.25 $ 3.20 $ 0.50 $ 11.25 $ 19.50 $149.01 ($14.95) ($ 5.00) ($1.75) ($21.70) $127.31 ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL COST Cost of Scraper Operator beyond Scraper hours $19.50 per hour x (2080 - 1100) hours $ 19,110.00 Less cost of 3/4 part-time employee beyond 1100 hours $14.95 per hour x $.75 (2080) - 1100 = 460 hours Additional annual personnel costs 877,00) $ 12,233.00 Additional personnel cost per Scraper hour $ 11.12 Ea_uivalent hourly cost less savings $ 127.31 Effective hourly Scraper cost $ 138.43 LIFE CYCLE COST OVER FOUR YEAR PERIOD Principal and Interest Less Buyback Extended Warranty Peterson Maintenance and Program Repair City Maintenance Insurance Tire Replacement Tire Repair Fuel and Oil SUBTOTAL Operator at $40,560 per year x 4 years TOTAL COST SAVINGS IN LESS USE OF D8 DOZER 3/4 Part-time employee $14.95 per hour = $23,322 per year Less fuel $5,500 per year Less repair and maintenance ($2,750 per year) ToT,~L SAVINGS Cost less savings over 4 year period Average yearly cost less savings Average hourly cost $589,120 ($195,000) $ 12,500 $ 60,985 $ 22,000 $14,180 $14,000 $ 2,100 $ 49,500 $569,385 $162,240 $731,625 ($93,288) ($22,000) ($1 ,ooo) ($126,288) $605,337 $151,334 $ 137.58 ESTIMATE OF FUNDS NEEDED TO OPERATE CITY-OWNED SCRAPER FOR BALANCE OF 1995/96 FISCAL YEAR FIXED COSTS First Prinicpal and Interest Payment Extended Power Train Warranty Payment Insurance $92,204 $12,500 VARIABLE COSTS (assume 530 hours of Scraper use from April to June 30, 1996) $10,335 ($ 7,923) $ 5,963 Scraper Operator 530 hours at $19.50 per hour less 3/4 Part-time Heavy Equipment Operator 530 hours at $14.95 per hour Fuel 530 hours at $11.25 per hour $ 7,346 Maintenance and Repair Service Agreement 530 hours at $13.86 per hour $120,425 SUBTOTAL "HARD" COSTS ALLOWANCES Tire Replacement- 530 hours at $3.20 per hour City Service and Wear Items 530 hours at $51.00 per hour SUBTOTAL "SOFT" COSTS TOTAL "HARD" AND "SOFT" COSTS Shortfall between Hard Costs Funds remaining in Account Shortfall between Hard plus Soft Costs Funds remaining in Account $ 1,696 $ 2,650 $ 4,611 $124,771 $120,425 (65.697) $ 54,728 $124,771 (65,697) $ 59,074 REPORT COST COMPARISON OF IN-HOUSE OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION vs. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FOR SCRAPER AND OPERATOR SUMMARY As directed by City Council, Staff has prepared this report for the purpose of comparing the cost of City ownership and operation versus the cost of contracting for the furnishing and operation of a self- propelled, rubber/tired scraper at the Ukiah Landfill. The City currently contracts with Wipf Construction for this service and Staff recommends that the City continue with this contractual service. Attached to this report are assumptions for in-house ownership and operation, estimates, memos, and reference material. Based on the assumptions, it would at least cost the City approximately $88.00 per hour to own and operate with a full-time City employee an equivalent scraper as the one provided by Wipf Construction. Wipf Construction has submitted a bid of $137.00 per hour. The difference of $49.00 represents the difference between City wages and prevailing wages and an allowance of approximately 16 percent for overhead and margin. If the service is contracted out, the service provider must pay prevailing wage. The prevailing wage for a Group 4 Operating Engineer in Area 2 is $38.86 per hour. Allowing a markup of 33 percent for employer paid taxes and other direct expenses the total hourly employee cost to the employer is $51.70. At City wages and direct costs the hourly cost is $20.95, a $30.75 per hour difference. The potential savings to the City should it elect to own and operate the scraper is $53,900 per year based on 1,100 yours of use per year; over a four (4) year use, the savings are projected at $215,600. Based on the anticipated savings, it is tempting to pui'~/ue ownership and operation, however, the risk of ownership is great. Scrapers, particular used ones, are high repair and maintenance items. In most cases, repairs will have to be performed by specialty technicians which will necessitate the need to transport the scraper out of area. Long downtimes of four (4) to six (6) weeks can be expected. Recently, Wipf's scraper was down four (4) weeks for repair, however, the City was provided a replacement unit pursuant to the Service Agreement. Under City ownership, it will be necessary to incur additional costs to contract for a replacement unit during those times the City's scraper is down for repairs. Another disadvantage to City ownership and operation is the need to hire a full-time operator even though the scraper does not run 12 months out of the year. Given our experience with part-time employees and their skill level, full-time employment would be the only way to attract a highly skilled operator to accept the position. During times this employee is sick or on personal leave, the scraper will be down. Under a contractual agreement, the service provider must provide a replacement operator should the primary operator be ill. Although more costly, the contractual arrangement lowers the City's risk for this needed service. Estimated man-hours expended on research, discussion and report for this item is 16 hours. CALCULATIONS OF OPERATIONAL COSTS FOR SCRAPER AT LANDFILL CITY-OWNED AND OPERATED ASSUMPTIONS Cost of used Scraper 8 to 10 years old (Approximately 16,000 hours) $125,000 City borrows money to purchase used Scraper at 6% interest compounded annually for 4 years. Total interest over the 4 year period is $18,750 based on assumptions that first payment of principal is made at end of first year. Principal for loan is repaid in equal installments over 4 years. Yearly principal payment $125,000 + 4 = $31,250 Assume yearly insurance premium at 1% of equipment value or $1,250 per year. Utilization is 1,100 hours per year based on history of use. Total hours of use over 4 years = 4,400 hours Fuel consumption approximately 100 gallons per 8 hours at $0.90 per gallon for diesel --- 1,100 hours per year x 100 gallons per 8 hours = ,$13,750 ~ = $12,375 per year + 1,100/hour = $11.25 per hour New tires at $3,500 each x 4 tires = $14,000 per set - tire life at 3,000 hours Purchase twice = $28,000 + 4,400 hours = $6.35 per hour HOURLY OPERATIONAL COST FOR 627 SCRAPER Interest on Loan ($18,750/4 x 1,100) = Principal Payment ($31,250/1,100) = Insurance ($1,250/1,100 hour) = Tire Replacement = Tire Repairs at 15% = Fuel ($12,375/1,100) = Lubrication at 50% of fuel = Mechanical Repairs/Allowance = Less Salvage ($12,500/1,100) = Heavy Equipment Operator $43,555/2,080 = TOTAL ESTIMATED COST HOURLY COST $ 4.25 $28.40 $ 1.15 $ 6.35 $0.95 $11.25 $ 5.60 $20.00 1,35) _ $66.60 $20.9 5 NOTE Prevailing wage for Group 4 Operating Engineer in Area 2 = $38.86 x 1.33 expenses = $51.68 say $51.70. taxes and other direct Scraper $66.60 Labor 51~ $137 - 118,30 = 15.8 % for OH and margin 118.30 Labor at i~revailing wage Labor cost for City Employee $51.68 per hour $30.73 CUSTOM PRODUCT BY CATERPILLAR Cat® Auger Scraper Attachment Caterpillar designed--meets the same standards as the machine itself. Cat design ensures quality, durability and reliability. 657E, 651E, 637E Series II, 631E Series II, 627F, 621F Wheel Tractor-Scrapers Flywheel Power Weight Capacity kW/HP .kg/LB m~/YD3 Factory installed--subject to the same ~5 3_6 175/79,750 1~. 9_6/21_ .____ _ manufacturing and quality control processes as the ~;i0~; 15'96/21 tractor-scraper. Installation is an in-plant 631E 366~490 45 980/101,370 23.7/31 operation...part of the machine manufacturing schedule. Caterpillar warranty--serviced by your authorized Cat dealer. Support is unmatched in the industry! Dust-free--auger attachment virtually elimnates dust while loading the scraper. Self-loading--results from elevating material in the bowl. Elevating action reduces rimpull required to power the cutting edge through m~terial. Highly productive-in a wide variety of materials.. · Effective in coal partings and stockpiling operations. · Easily handles laminated rock and granular materials. · Breaks up slab materials for easy loading and spreading. Series II 637E 523/700 54 540/120,235 23.7/31 Series II 651E 443~594 66 575/146,770 33.6~44 657E 708/950 75 875/167,270 33.6/44 NOTE: For standard features and specifications, refer to the standard machine specification sheet. Featured machines may include additional equipment applicable only for special application~.: Consult your authorized Calerpillar dealer for available options. ,/ FEATURES Increases productivity · Self-loading capability--results as optional stinger teeth rips materiaL..auger breaks, lifts and distributes the material evenly in the bowl. · Stinger teeth initially break material, eliminating the need for pre-ripping. · Auger's lifting action he]ps fill the scraper without pumping the bowl or spinning the tires...requires shorter cut distance. · Auger's even distribution helps fill voids to ensure maximum loads on each cycle. · System eliminates the need for a push dozer or for tandem, push-pull partner. · Improved hauling--larger loads and less spillage result in more material being transported on each cycle. · Apron closes tightly to drastically reduce spills and maintain large loads on the carry. · Improved spreading--faster dump times with even lifts or in one spot. · Three-step cycle empties the bowl quickly. - Apron raises. - Angled ejector moves forward, dozing material toward the auger. - Auger rotates, casting material from the bowl. · Equally at home in a variety of applications--the auger scraper can load overburden or unshot coal, handle partings, and work coal or topsoil stockpiles equally well. Reduces owning, operating costs · Hitch life improved--improvement results from elimination of pushing and pulling stresses encountered in push dozing or tandem, push-pull operation. Retrofit kits, updates available · Retrofit kits--convert your open bowl scraper to the new Caterpillar auger system...for maximum productivity. Reduced owning and operating costs directly affect your profit picture. · Tire wear drastically reduced--less wear occurs because tire spinning is virtually eliminated. · o Update your open bowl scraper or your WOTCO auger system to the Caterpillar auger scraper. · Update kits--rework your existing WOTCO auger to include the latest Caterpillar design, complete with Cat hydraulics, service and warranty. 2 Auger and wear shoes... configurations and options Auger and Attachments · Standard auger configurationmperforms well in applications in shale, coal or top soil where some rock is encountered. Auger flight manufactured from 19 mm/0.75" T1 steel. · Wear strip, manufactured from 152 mm/6" wide, 12.7 mm/0.5' thick UHMW polymer, mounted on top of the flight surface, next to the auger shaft, to help prevent material from sticking to the auger...increase loading productivity. · Wear plates, manufactured from 12 mm/0.5" thick, 450 to 500 Brinell steel, help protect the top surface of the auger flight. - Wear platesare welded on to the flights so that they can be removed and replaced. · Wear shoes wrap around the edge of the flight protect the auger and extend service life.. - Wear shoe bolt on for easy removal and replacement...shoes can be rotated from bottom to top for maximum service life. · Full UHMW wear cover--available for applications involving extremely coheisve materials such as wet clay or highly abrasive materials such as sand. * Cover enhances loading and unloading in cohevice materials...increases productivity. · Cover reduces auger wear in highly abrasive materials...lengthens service life. · Full cover is not recommended for applications involving heavy or sharp rock. Cat Auger Scrapers These attachments increase both the productivity and service life of the auger system...to improve your bottom line! UHMW polymer cover Wear plates Standard auger configuration. Wear shoe UHMW polymer cover Wear Shoe Options · Standard wear shoe--works well in applications involving top soil containing some rock, shale or coal. · Shoe is manufactured of heat-treated, cast, 450 to 500 Brinell steel for excellent resistance to wear. · Nickel-alloy shoe--designed for moderatley abrasive applications and materials such as large rock and caliche. · Niickel-alloy wrapper provides additional wear surface on the corner of the shoe...extends life over the standard shoe. · Nickel-alloy shoe is not recommended for wet sand applications. · Tungsten-carbide shoe--delivers maximum wear resistance in highly abrasive applications. · Tungsten-carbide wrapper can extend wear life over the standard shoe when working in materials such as wet sand. Auger with full UHMW polymer cover. Wrapper Standard shoe. Nickel-alloy and tungsten- carbide shoes with wrappers. CUSTOM PRODUCT BY CATERPILLAR Cat Auger Scrapers Caterpillar® Auger Scraper A factory-installed, base auger kit converts the standard scraper into a highly productive, self- loading auger scraper. Hydrostatically driven system The auger is powered by a hydraulic motor with a double-reduction, planetary drive box. The package has an integrated hydraulic system with separate filters and cooler. High hydraulic pressure with moderate flow provide optimum auger speed and torque. Electronic controls The system control uses electronic switches. These switches incorporate built-in delays. The delay feature helps protect the shaft and bearings from shock loads that could shorten service life. The control design allows easy access to the switches should repairs be necessary. The iron The auger and drive are installed between upper frame and lower support assemblies. The reduction box is bolted to the upper frame assembly. The auger mounts in the lower support assembly. The lower assembly uses twin, tapered roller bearings, similar to those used in articulation hitches for Cat motor graders and wheel loaders. This bearing arrangement provides excellent reliability and durability. It is lubricated with 30-weight oil and sealed with Caterpillar's Duo-Cone seals. The upper frame assembly mounts across two sidewall extensions. These extensions also maintain bowl design capacity with the auger installed. A stroke reduction sleeve shortens the ejector travel to clear the auger. Two extensions on the ejector face push material past the auger to the cutting edge. The base edge of the bowl can be equipped with a variety of ground engaging tools. These tools include: · Standard, straight cutting edge. · Cutting edge teeth. · Cutting adapters and tips. · Rock kits. The chart and photographs show the auger installation. Key Component Key Component A Lower support assembly E Sidewall extension B Auger F Ejector face extension C Drive box G Cutting edge D Upper frame assembly CATERPILLAR Custom Products Caterpillar Inc. Peoria, IL USA IEHQ0261 (12-93) Replaces AEHQ9334 Printed in U.S.A. Materials and specifications are subject to change without notice © 1993 Caterpillar PETERSON TRACTOR CO. SAN LEANDRO (415) 357-6200 CHICO (916) 343-1911 EUREKA (707) 443-1653 LIVERMORE (415) 455-4800 , NAPA' (707) 258-0550 REDDING (916) 243-5410 SAN JOSE (408) 436-8835 " SANTA ROSA (707) 576-1616 WlLLITS (707) 459-5575 WILLOWS (916) 934-8839 SOLD TO · SHIP TO . ' ? PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS, INC. A SUBS/DIARY OF PETERSON TRACTOR CO. SAN LEANDRO (415) 895-8400 CENTURY LINE MARTINEZ. (4151 674-0425 · .I PLEASE RETURN THIS COPY' WITH REMITTANCE' '¢'., f" ;4 h 4 7 9 !::; :1 9.0 0 ALL NEW CATERPILLAR PARTS UTILIZED IN THIS REPAIR SERVICEARE COVERED BY THE STANDARDI CATERPILLAR WARRANTY TO BE FREE OF DEFECTS FOR A PERIOD OF SIX¢8) MONTHS. LABOR PERFORMED '" PAY THIS BY US IS WARRANTED FOR 90 DAYS. NO OTHER WARRANTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS WARRANTY AMOUNT IS LIMITED TO THE PROVISION AND INSTALLATION OF PARTS AND EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES ALL CLAIMS FOR . OTHER ECONOMIC LOSS OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE. ' ' I AMOUNT ,. + CREDITED I TERMS ON APPROVED CHARGE ACCOUNTS: NET 10TH PROXIMO l~e/e PER MONTH FINANCE THEREAFTER. REMIT TO: PETERSON ' P.O, BOX 5258 ' SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577 CUSTOMER DUPLICATE INVOICE PETERSON TRACTOR CO. SAN LEANDRO (415) 357-6200 CHICO (fi16) 343-1911 EUREKA (707) 443-1653 LIVERMORE (415) 455-4800 NAPA · o (707) 258-0550 REDDING (916) 243-5410 SAN JOSE (408) 436-8835 SANTA ROSA (707) 576-1616 WlLLITS (707) 459-5575 WILLOWS (916) 934-8839 SOLD TO SHIP TO PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS, INC. ,4 SUBSIDIARY OF PETERSON TRACTOR CO. SAN LEANDRO (415) 895-8400 CENTURY LINE MARTINEZ (415) 674-0425 PLEASE RETURN THIS COPY WITH. REMITTANCE · .. 1'. e.~ 1 (.:-:, ~.!~ r: o !:) :i..'fi 9 ,' · ° ALL NEW CATERPILLAR PARTS UTILIZED IN THIS REPAIR SERVICE ARE COVERED BY THE STANDARD CATERPILLAR WARRANTY TO BE FREE OF DEFECTS FOR A PERIOD OF SIX(8) MONTHS. LABOR PERFORMED BY US IS WARRANTED FOR 90 DAYS. NO OTHER WARRANTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS WARRANTY IS LIMITED TO THE PROVISION AND INSTALLATION OF PARTS AND EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES ALL CLAIMS FOR OTHER ECONOMIC LOSS OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE. TERMS ON APPROVED CHARGE ACCOUNTS: NET lOTH PROXIMO 1~% PER MONTH FINANCE THEREAFTER. ' , REMIT TO: PETERSON P.O. BOX 5258 SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577 CUSTOMER DUPLICATE INVOICE PAY THIS AMO~__..~ AMOUNT CREDITED PETERSON TRACTOR CO. SAN LEANDRO (415) 357-6200 CHICO (916) 343-1911 EUREKA (707) 443-1653 NAPA ~ 258-0550 REDDING (916) 243-5410 SAN JOSE /~00~ 436-8835 SANTA ROSA 576-1616 WILLITS (707) 459-5575 WILLOWS (916) 934-8839 SOLD TO ;I. :i,t ;:~ () .,'.".~ 1; R F:' I') I~ "f' R I'l F:I j I:~ ['; I..I ~::'l .?; ;1: t',J (':~, I') I:i; F' "l', SHIP TO · . PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS, INC. A SUBSIDIARY OF PETERSON TRACTOR CO. SAN LEANDRO (415) 895-8400 CENTURY LINE MARTINEZ (415) 674-0425 PLEASE RETURN THIS COPY WITH REMITTANCE ALL NEW CATERPILLAR PARTS UTILIZED IN THIS REPAIR SERVICE ARE COVERED BY THE STANDARD CATERPILLAR WARRANTY TO BE FREE OF DEFECTS FOR A PERIOD OF SIX(8) MONTHS.' LABOR PERFORMED BY US IS WARRANTED FOR 90 DAYS. NO OTHER WARRANTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS WARRANTY IS LIMITED TO THE PROVISION AND INSTALLATION OF PARTS AND EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES ALL CLAIMS FOR OTHER ECONOMIC LOSS OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE, - TERMS ON APPROVED CHARGE ACCOUNTS: NET lOTH PROXIMO 1~% PER MONTH FINANCE THEREAFTER, 'i ° REMIT TO: PETERSON P.O.' BOX 5258 SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577 CUSTOMER DUPLICATE INVOICE PAY THIS AMOUNT ' [ AMOUNT '~ PETERSON TRACTOR CO. · SAN LEANDRO (415) 357-6200 CHICO (916) 343-1911 EUREKA (707) 443-1653 LIVERMORE (415) 455-4800 NAPA (707) 258-0550 REDDING (916) 243-5410 SAN JOSE (408) 436-8835 SANTA ROSA (707) 576-1616 WILLITS (707) 459-5575 WILLOWS (916) 934-8839 PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS;' INC. ,4 SUBSIDI,4RY OF PE-FERSON TRACTOR CO. · SAN LEANDRO (415) 895-8400 CENTURY LINE MARTINEZ (415) 674-0425 SOLD TO , SHIP TO ' PLEASE RETURN THIS COPY WITH REMITTANCE , . ~i~4.76~S ,. ALL NEW CATERPILLAR PARTS UTILIZED IN THIS REPAIR SERVICE ARE ~OVERED.BY .THE STANDARD CATERPILLAR WARRANTY TO BE FREE OF DEFECTS FOR A PERIOD OF SIX(6) MONTHS, LABOR PERFORMED BY US IS WARRANTED FOR 90 DAYS, NO OTHER WARRANTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THIS WARRANTY IS LIMITED TO THE PROVISION AND INSTALLATION OF PARTS AND EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES ALL CLAIMS FOR OTHER ECONOMIC LOSS OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE. TERMS ON APPROVED CHARGE ACCOUNTS: NET lOTH PROXIMO 1Va% PER MONTH FINANCE THEREAFTER. , ,. REMIT TO:' PETERSON P.O. BOX 5258 -SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577 CUSTOMER DUPLICATE INVOICE '1 :, PAY THIS ' AMOUNT i' AMOUNT · CREDITED HOV 06 '95 09:21AP~ PETERSON SAHTA ROSA P.I.."1 NOVEMBER 6, 1995 CITY OF UKfAH 627~ AUGER 1. DELIVERY TIME: 12 - 14 WEEKS 2. GUARANTEE BUYBACK.: $195,000 AS PER LETTER 3. EXTENDED POWER TRAIN WARRANTY: $12,300 AS PER WARRANTY STATEMENT 4. PETERSON TOTAL HAINTENANCE PRICE~ $13.86 PER WORKING HOUR'AS PER LETTER · .. , , i',IOU tB ' g~ ...:J 9:138 7rd? 57S 0741 PAGE.001 PETERSON SINCE 1;13G NOVEMBER 3, 1995 CITY OF UKIAH 1320 AIRPORT RD. UKIAH CA, 95482 ATTN: MR. RICK KENNEDY DEAR RICK, PER OUR QUOTATION PETERSON TRACTOR WILL PROVIDE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR A PERIOD OF 48 MONTHS OR 5000 HOURS WHICHEVER COMES FIRST, FROM THE DATE OF DELIVERY. THIS PROGRAM WILL INCLUDE SCHEDULED SERVICES OUTLINED BY CATERPILLAR THAT ARE DETAILED IN THE MAINTENANCE MANUAL. THOSE ENCOMPASS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT 250, 500, 1000, AND 2000 HOUR INTERVALS, ALSO INCLUDED IN THIS ARE ENTIRE MACHINE INSPECTIONS. IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE SERVICE INTERVALS WE WILL REPAIR, OR REPLACE (AT OUR DISCRETION) FAILED ITEMS OR COMPONENTS THAT MAY OCCUR DURING THE ABOVE PERIOD IN THIS AGREEMENT. SUCH ITEMS AS EXAMPLE MAY INCLUDE TURBOCHARGERS, HYD. PUMPS, HOSES, SEALS, GASKETS, ECT. WE WILL ADDITIONALLY INCLUDE UNDER CATERPILLAR GUIDELINES VALVE ADJUSTMENTS, PRESSURE ADJUSTMENTS, AND OTHER PERFORMANCE RELATED ITEMS. UNDER THESE ABOVE ITEMS AND CRITERIA WE WILL PROVIDE CAT OIL, FILTERS, GENUINE CAT PARTS, LABOR, AND TRAVEL EXPENSES, PLUS ANY APPLICABLE TAXES. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SCHEDULING AND ALL NEEDS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY OF UKIAH. THE CITY OF UKIAH WILL ADDITIONALLY BE LIABLE FOR ANY REPAIRS CAUSED BY THE LACK OF DAILY OR WEEKLY MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY AND OR OTHER REPAIRS DEEMED TO BE OUTSIDE NORMAL WEAR OR TEAR. (I.E. - ABUSE, NEGLECT, OR ACCIDENT DAMAGE) ADDITIONALLY ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS AGREEMENT ARE AS FOLLOWS: 3710 REGIONAL PARKWAY, SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95403 (707) 576-1616 PETERSON SINCE 1936 A) GROUND ENGAGING TOOLS ( CUTTING EDGES, ROUTER BITS, AUGER FLITE, ECT.) B) DAILY AND 50 HOUR FLUID CHECKS AND GREASING, INCLUDING OIL TOP OFFS AND FUEL. C) FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM D) AIR CONDITION SYSTEM E) TIRES AND RIMS F) WHEEL BRAKES G) GLASS AND COSMETIC DAMAGE AGAIN WE ENTER IN THIS AGREEMENT THAT THE CITY OF UKIAH WILL NOTIFY US, AT OR NEAR THE APPROPRIATE TIME AT WHICH SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE IS DUE OR A MECHANICAL DEFECT IS OBSERVED, WE WILL RESERVE THE. RIGHT TO DETERMINE THE SITE OF THE ABOVE REPAIRS. THE COST OF THESE REPAIRS IS TO BE $13.86 PER CLOCKED HOUR. THIS WILL BE RECORDED QUARTERLY BY PETERSON AND THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED BASED ON CLOCKED HOURS DURING THAT QUARTER. THIS MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FIGURE IS BASED ON THE HOURS AND APPLICATION DESCRIBED AT THE TIME OF BID. SHOULD THE APPLICATION CHANGE IN ANY WAY, MORE HOURS, MORE TONNAGE, DIFFERENT JOB SITE, ECT., THE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FIGURE WILL NEED TO BE RENEGOTIATED TO ALLOW FOR THAT CHANGE. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE OF SERVICE. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT (707) 459-9006. MARK GUIN 3710 REGIONAL PARKWAY, SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95403 (707) 576-1616 SINCE 1936 November 2, 1995 CITY OF UKIAH Re: Caterpillar 627F Scraper To Whom It May Concern: Peterson Tractor Co. feels that our guaranteed buy back after four years, 1200 hours, per year with normal wear and tear will be $195,000.00. Thank you, Peterson Tractor Co. Used Equipment Manager RM/bsj 955 Marina Boulevard · PO. Box 5258, San Leandro, California 94577 · Telephone (510) 357-6200 · Fax (510) 352-5952 ~.~ > o 0-~ ~ Oct, 25, 1995 2' iOF'M CFSC-PHOEN!X 6087 P, 2/2 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES 3322 WEST END AVE. NASHVILLE TN 37209 CITY OF UKIAH - 627F Compounding period...: Annual 10-25-1995 16:04:38 pg i Nominal annual rate..: 5.900 % CASH FLOW DATA Event Loan Payment Payment Date Amount # Period End-date 12-01-95 514,284.13 1 12-01-95 92,203.55 5 Annual 12-01-99 12-01-99 128,102.00 i AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE - Normal amortization, 360 day Pmt Date Palrment Interest Loan 12-01-1995 I 12-01-1995 92,203.55 0.00 1995 totals 92,203.55 .',' 0.00 2 12-01-1996 92,203.55 24,902.75 1996 totals 92,203.$5 24,902.75 3 12-01-1997 92,203.55 20,932.01 1997 totals 92,203.55 20,932.01 4 12-01-1998 92,203.55 16,726.99 1998 totals 92,203.55 16,726.99 5 12-01-1999 92,203.55 12,273.87 6 12-01-1999 128,102.00 0.00 1999 totals 220,305.55 12,273.87 Principal 92,203.55 92,203.55 67,300.80 67,300.80 71,271.54 71,271.54 75,476.56 75,476.56 79,929.68 28,102.00 08,031.68 Balance 514,284.13 422,080.58 354,779.78 283,508.24 208,031.68 128,102.00 0.00 Grand totals 589,119.75 74,835.62 514,284.13 wtth Cateroillar Irmancial Sen, k'es Cml~. shoul, d not ~ used for buyout gurpo~. If the intorest fisues aro being 5sed for tax purposes we suggest you contact a tax aaeountnnt. DELIVERY SUPPLEMENT This pertains to the Lea~, dated as of Corporation as Lessor and as Lessee. ,between Caterpillar Financial Services This confirms that the ~ physically _r,~_eived the following Unit on the possession date below. As of the date of signature of this form, (i) the Unit is in aH respects satisfactory to Lessee for leasing under the Lease, and (ii) Lessor has performed all of its obligations under the Lease. Descriotion of Unit: County: Eouioment Located: Inside .. or Outside. City Limits Possession Date: Signature Name (PRINT) Title Date Form No. 0002 4/94 RIDER NO. TO AGREEMENT DATED AS OF ,19°~- BETWEEN CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND CONDITION OF EQUIPMENT UPON RETURN Notwithsumding the provisions of (check ~ppropriate box): I'-'1 Sections 4 and 9 of the M~ter T~x ~ r'-'l Sections 4 and 9 of the M~ter Finance Lease !---! Sections 4 and 9 of the Governmental L~-Purchase Agroement !----I Sections :5 and 12 of the Finance ~ I~1 Sections 5 and 13 of the Long-Term Rental Agreement l---i Sections 4 and 10 of the Oovenunenlal Ag, re~nent ~ ~rees that each Unit, upon its return, shall: 1. be in sound mechanical shape and, if mobile, shall be in good working order under full payload; 2 & have tires in safe and operable condition with a minimum of forty Ire'cent (40%) original tread life remaining; OR b. have a minimum of forty percent (40%) life remaining on ~11 undercarriage components including track ~oes, links, pins and bushings, idlers, bogies, sprockets, carri .er rollers, track rollers and belts for belted drive units with no cuts extending into the belt cords; 3. have no cracked or broken glass; 4. have no missing sheet metal and any damage to sheet metal shall not exceed $1,.500.00; and $. have no slxuctural damage to the frame. The condition of each Unit shall be determined by an inspection report done prior to its return to be provided by Lessor. In lieu of returning a Unit in the condition specified above, Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for the cost to restore the Unit to such condition. ("Lessee") C~lerpillar Financial Services Corpo~on ('Lessor") N~ne (Prin0: Name (Prin0: '['iBc: Title: ,, Date: Date: CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT APPLICATION SURVEY Customer Name: ,, Model: .... Attachments: _ If mac?ne is to be used in a landfill, demolitio.n, transfer station, recycling application, scrap yard, steel mill, salt, chemical, corro~ve, or hazardous waste environment, it ~s not necessary to complete the remaining portions of this application surve~y. Circle the a.p. propriate aforementioned application, complete page 2 and sign at the bottom. You will also need to consult your Caterpdlar Financial Services Corporation regional olT~ce to obtain the necessary quote _d~ta. THE CHART BELOW WILL DETERIVHNE THE APPLICATION FACTOR NECESSARY TO QUOTE THIS TRANSACTION. COMPLETE TH~ FOLLOWINO TI~ STEPS: 1. ~se the appropriate MARKET CATEGORY and circle the BASE number (one category per survey form). 2. Complete only this MARKET CATECK)RY LINE BY CIRCLING ~ number under SECTION A CTOTAL HOURS PER YEAR) and ONE number under SECTION B (U/C, SHEET METAL OR ~ELT CLAUSE). 3. Add or $ublract as necessary the ~ circled numbers starting with BASE and enter in the TOTAL POINTS column. (SEC'I'ION A) (SEC'TION B) TOTAL HOURS PER YEAR U/C, SHEET METAL, OR TOTAL MARKET CATEGORY* BASE 0- 1,201 - 2,201 - 4(X)I -5001 + TIRE/BELTCLAUSE POINTS 1,200 2,200 4,000 5000 YES NO I4F. AVY CONSTRUCTION 4 .2 1 .. -1 -2 -3 +2 -1 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 4 2 I -i -2 -3 +2 - 1 MINING/AGGREGATE 4 2 i -1 -2 -3 +2 -1 AGRICI. R. TURE 4 2 I -1 -2 -3 +2 -1 FORF. ST PRODUCTS 3 2 I -1 -2 -3 +2 -1 PAVING PRODUCTS 3 2 . I -1 -2 -3 +1 -1 INDUSTRIAL 5 I -1 -2 -3 -4 +1 -1 GO~NTAL 7 I -1 -2 -3 -4 +1 -1 eMARKET DEFINITIONS I'IEAVY CONSTRUCTION - All highway/road construction, dams, railroads, airports and large eanhmoving projects, including landfill site preparation. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MINING/AGGREGATE IaOREST PRODUCTS PAVING PRODUCTS - All site development, sewer/water and utilities consm~on relating to building projects. - All metal and non-metal mining including quarries and sand/gravel olm'ations. - All timber harvesting, handling, logging road construct, sawmills and logging yards. - All Caterpillar paving products, including compactors used for soil compacting excluding the 800 INDUSTRIAL - All machines used inside an industrial plant or complex for the purpose of handling raw materials, finished products or any other task requited. (Machines are owned or leased by thc plant itself.) - All machines used by governmental entities for any purpose mher than any application listed in the enclosed block above. 14Iisi of h ~; ~l Lotm~ ~t do orca to h ~ ~ ~ ~ em, why Mol ~ ~iw~ bom b i ~ ~ ~ h~ of ~ ~ "~' ~ be ~ mff~" M. ~ b m~ of ~ 1~ of b ~. of ~ Mb o W b ~ Mk~ e~~ Gm ~mm. Wee M ~ Learner pm~ ~b h~f. ff ~mw m~ melee ~ UM m ~ M~fl m~d by ~c~ 4 ~W. ff ~ U~ ~ml ~ ~ b~ ~, ~ M ~p~ d~ (M m~ ~ ~ Leo~ O. WA~R A~ ~: LESSEE ~IY ~8fl A~ ~N KW H ~ ~ A~T ~ ~ A~ ~. ~ A~ TO ~, LM~ ~ T~ A~ F~ ~QUENT~L OA~I~, L~ES, DEMA~S, ~1, I~l AK ~~. A~ ALL ~ ~ ~ ~ M~ON ~M, ~ A~ORNEY'S FEES A~ E~ES, ~1~ MAY ~S~T ~ ~ AR~E ~ ~ ~ I~l~, ~8E, ~L~RY ~~ ANY DELAY ~ ~ FA[~ ~ DEL~RY). C~DITION, USE, ~KA~ON. OWNE~. MA~NA~ ~T B ~D TO LEHOR ~UANT TO iE~ON 10) ~ LEASE ~ AS TO ~OM ~ ~L ~ ~REIN OR ~OM ~ DE~. MA~A~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~OM A~ ~E, ~N~ ~ MPA~ ~ ANY ~T, MGA~ ~ ~N IU~ ~CT SHALL ~ ~VE~D. ~R ~ ~T ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~M ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B L~. ~ ~~ ~ w~ of Loem ~t~ Mk ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ bM k M ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ M ~; k) bom ~l. ~ ~) m~ Looo~ to mt~ h U~o N ~ ~ ~ 10. ~ h tm of b ~ mdd ff~ ~ meal h doe of bm~m~qt of ~~m; ~, M ~ d~ poM~ M~M ~2 ~f; N ~. B. LESSEE'S FISCAL YEAR: to C. CREDIT UTILIZATION DATE: D. LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: The lesser of five percent (5%) l~r month or the highest charge allowed by law. E. LOCATION OF UNIT(S): F. Without the prior written consent of the Lessor, no assignment of this 'Lease or any right or obligation hereunder may be made by Lessee or any assignee of Lessee. Lessor may not assign its right, title and interest in and to this Lease and the Unit(s) and/or grant or assign a security interest in this Lease and the Unit(s) in whole or in part. G. REPORT TO IRS: Lessee will report this Lease to the Internal Revenue Service by filing either Form 8038-(3, 8038-GC, or 8038 whichever is appropriate. Failure to do so will cause the Lease to lose its tax exempt status. Lessee agrees that if the appropriate form is not filed, the interest rate will be adjusted to an equivalent taxable interest rate. H. PAYMENT PROVISION: Lessee shall pay to Lessor payments (including the principal and interest portion) in on the Delivery Date. consecutive · installments commencing I. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: RIDERS: Form No. 0031-$/93 and interest in and to this Lease and the Units and/or grant or assign a security interest in this Lease and the Units, in whole or in part. Section 11 Title, Security Interest and Further Assurances Provided (a) Lessee has accepted each Unit on its delivery date; (b) the Delivery Date of the Unit is on or prior to the Credit Utilization Date noted on the face hereof; and (c) no Event of Default exists as of the Delivery Date of the Unit, title to each Unit shall vest in Lessee on the Delivery Date of the Unit, provided, however, that in the event (i) this Lease is terminated pursuant to Section 1 hereof, or (ii) an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, title to the Unit shall immediately revest in Lessor, free of any right, title and interest of Lessee, unless Lessor elects otherwise in writing. Lessee hereby grants to Lessor a continuing security interest in the Units, including all attachments, acces- sories and optional features (whether or not installed thereon) and all substitutions, replacements, additions and accessions thereto, and all proceeds of all of the foregoing, to secure the payment of all sums due. Lessee will, at its expense, do any further act and execute, acknowledge, deliver, file, register and record any further documents which Lessor may reasonably request in order to protect Lessor's security interest in the Units and lessor's rights and benefits under this Lease Section 12 Effect of Waiver A delay or omission by Lessor to exercise any right, power or remedy shall not impair the right, power or remedy and shall not be construed to be a waiver of any breach or default. Any waiver or consent by Lessor of or to any breach or default must be in writing. Section 13 Severability and Survival of Covenants If any provision of this Lease shall be invalid under any law, it shall be inapplicable and deemed omitted but the remaining .provisions shall be given effect in accordance with the intent of the Lease. All obligations of Lessee under'Sections 1, 2, 4. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 sl~all s'u~vive'the expiration or termination of this Lease to the extent required for their full observance and performance. Section 14 Applicable Law This lease shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State where the Units are located. Section 1S Effect and Modification of lease This Lease exclusively and completely states the rights of Lessor and Lessee with respect to the leasing of a Unit and supersedes all prior agree- ments, oral or written. No variation or modification of this lease shall be valid unless in writing. Section 18 Financial Information Lessee shall keep its books and records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices and shall deliver to Lessor its annual audited financial statements and those unaudited financial statements reasonably requested by Lessor. Lessee represents and warrants to lessor that all credit, financial and other information submitted to Lessor is and shall be true, correct and complete. Section 17 Notices All demands and notices shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered or received by mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the other party at the address stated above or at any other address as may be furnished in writing by one party to the other. Section 18 Copies Two copies of this Lease have been executed by the parties. One has been marked 'iessor's Copy' and the other has been marked 'Lessee's Copy.' Only the copy marked 'Lessor's Copy' shall evidence a monetary obligation of Lessee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease. (Lessee) CATERPILLAR RNANCIAL SERVICES CORI~RTATION (Lessor) Signature: Name (PRINT): TrUe: Date: Signature: Name (PRINT): T~tle: Date: against payment, whether arising by reason of any past, present or future claims of any nature by Lessee against Lessor or otherwise. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Lease shall not terminate, nor shall the obligations of Lessor or Lessee be otherwise affected by reason of any defect in, damage to, loss of possession or use or destruction of any Unit, however caused, by the attachment of any lien, encumbrance, security interest or other claim of any third party to any Unit, by any restriction of or interference with Lessee's use of any Unit or for any other cause, whether similar or dissimilar to the foregoing, any present or future law to the contrary notwithstanding. 2.4 Lessee reasonably believes that funds can be obtained suffi- cient to make all payments due during the term of this Lease and hereby covenants that it will make provision for such payments in budgets submitted to its governing body for the purpose of obtaining funding and use its bona fide best efforts to have such portion of the budget approved by its governing body. It is Lessee's intent to make all payments due under this Lease for the full term of the Lease if funds are available therefor. In that regard, Lessee represents that the use of the Units is essential to Lessee's proper, efficient and economic operation. In the event no funds or insufficient funds are appropriated and budgeted or funds are otherwise not available in any fiscal year for payments due under this Lease, then the Lessee will immediately notify Lessor of such occurrence and this Lease shall terminate on the last day of the fiscal year for which appropriations were received without penalty or expense to Lessee of any kind whatsoever except as to the portions of the payments herein agreed upon for which funds have been appropriated and budgeted or are otherwise available. Subsequent to a termination of this Lease, Lessee shall have no obligation to make payments becoming due subse- quent to the termination of the Lease. In the event of such termination, Lessee agrees to return the Units to Lessor pursuant to Section 9 hereof and Lessor shall have all legal and equitable rights and remedies to take possession of the Units. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee agrees that, to the extent permitted by law, it will not: (a) cancel this Lease under the provision of this Section 2.4 if any funds are appropriated to it or by it for the acquisition, retention or operation of the Units or other equip- ment performing functions similar to the Units for the fiscal year in which such termination occurs or the next succeeding fiscal year thereafter; (b) give priority in the application of funds to any other functionally similar equipment during the term of this Lease; and (c) terminate this Lease in order to acquire any other equipment or to allocate funds directly or indirectly to perform essentially the same application for which the Units are intended. Section 3 Warranty Disclaimer Lessee acknowledges and agrees that (a) each Unit is of a size, design and make selected by Lessee, (b) each Unit is suitable for Lessee's purposes, (c) each Unit contains all safety features deemed necessary by Lessee, (d) Lessor is not the manufacturer of any Unit, (e) the vendor of any Unit is not an agent of Lessor, and (f) LESSOR HAS NOT MADE, AND DOES NOT HEREBY MAKE, ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE MERCHANTABILITY, CONDITION, QUALITY, DESCRIPTION OR DURABILITY OF A UNIT, OR ITS FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Lessor assigns to lessee, to the extent assignable, any warranties of a Unit by its manufacturer and/ or vendor, provided that any action taken byLessee by reason thereof shall be at the expense of Lessee, Section 4 Possession, Use and Maintenance 4.1 Lessee shall not (a) use, operate, maintain or store a Unit improperly, carelessly, unsafely or in violation of any applicable law or regulation of any governmental authority or for any purpose other than in the conduct of its business; (b) abandon a Unit; (cl except as may be provided in a Rider to this Lease executed by Lessor and Lessee, sublease a Unit or permit its use by anyone other than Lessee withoL3t the prior written consent of Lessor: (d) permit the use of a Unit to be'changed ' from that specified in the Application Survey attached to t,he a,p,olica, ble Schedule without the prior written consent of Lessor; (e) permit the location of a Unit to be changed from that specified in the applicable Schedule without the prior written consent of Lessor; or (f) create, incur or allow to exist any lien, claim, security interest or encumbrance on any of its rights hereunder or a Unit. 4.2 Lessee, at its expense, shall maintain each Unit in good operating order, repair and condition and shall perform maintenance at least as fre- quently as set forth in any applicable operator's guide, service manual, or lubrication and maintenance guide for each Unit. 4.3 Lessee shall not alter a Unit or affix any accessory or equipment to it if doing so will impair its originally intended function or use or reduce its value. Any alteration or addition to a Unit, including the alteration of any safety feature, shall be at the sole risk and responsibility of Lessee. All parts, accessories and equipment affixed to a Unit, excluding temporary replace- ments, shall be subject to the security interest of Lessor. If no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, Lessee may remove at its expense any such parts, accessories and equipment at the expiration of the term of this Lease with respect to the Unit, provided that removal will not impair its originally intended function or use. 4.4 If Lessor supplies Lessee with labels stating that the Unit is leased from Lessor, Lessee shall affix and keep them in a prominent place on the Unit. 4.5 Lessor or its agents shall have the right, at all reasonable times, to inspect a Unit, observe its use, and inspect any maintenance records relating to it. Lessor assumes no responsibility and waives no rights as a result of any inspection or observation. 4.6 Each Unit shall remain the personal property of Lessor regardless of its use or manner or attachment to realty. Section 5 Taxes Lessee agrees to promptly pay or reimburse lessor for all fees and taxes of any nature, together with any penalties, fines or additions to tax, or interest thereon lall of the foregoing hereafter the 'Impositions'). arising at any time prior to, during or subsequent to the Lease term and levied by any taxing authority with respect to or in connection with any Unit, excluding, however, taxes measured by Lessor's net income. Lessee shall prepare and file, in a manner satisfactory to lessor, any reports or returns which may be required with respect to the Units. For purposes of this section, 'Lessor' shall include any affiliated group, within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code, of which lessor is a member for any year in which a consolidated or combined income tax return is filed for the affiliated group. Section 6 Coss or Damage and Waiver and Indemnity 6.1 Lessee assumes all risks and liabilities of loss, damage or Casualty Occurrence (as hereinafter defined) for any cause whatsoever, for condem- nation of any Unit prior to, during or subsequent to (until the Unit is returned to Lessor pursuant to Section 9) the Lease term, and for injury to or death of any person or damage to any property in any manner arising out of or incident to the possession, use, operation, condition or storage of the Unit. If any Unit becomes damaged, from any cause whatsoever, Lessee shall give Lessor prompt notice thereof. If Lessor reasonably determines that such damage is not irreparable, then Lessee shall, at its expense, promptly restore the Unit to the condition required by Section 4 above. If any Unit becomes worn out, lost, stolen, destroyed or irreparably damaged (as reasonably determined by Lessor) from any cause whatsoever, or taken by condemnation or otherwise {any such occurrence hereafter a 'Casualty Occurrence') prior to, during or subsequent to (until the Unit is returned to Lessor pursuant to Section 9) the Lease term, Lessee shall give Lessor prompt notice thereof. In the event of a Casualty Occurrence, lessee shall pay to Lessor, on the earlier of (a) the first payment date following such Casualty Occurrence RENTAL AND CONCLUDING PAYMENT SCHEDULE UCC/ REGISTRATION Shows the b~eakdown of principal and Interest Cat Financial will be excluding from ~ Income for tax purpoael, as well al the balance due In the event of an Ir~urance Io~. For tran~actlorm on a Government Lea~e-Purcha~e, Cat Financial Is con~lderad to be the lender against the equipment and must file UCC/Registration' ~tatementa which show Cat Financlal'l loan Inter. est In the collateral. 713 L3/91 8. The units leased under the Lease are personal property and, when subject to use by Lessee, will not be or become t~xtures under the laws of' the State or' , 9. The authorization, approval and execution of the Lease. the Schedule(s) and all other documents contemplated by the Lease and ali other proceedings of' the Lessee r~lated to the transactions therein and contemplated thereby have been perf'ormed in accordance with all olin me, ting laws, public bidding laws. and all other applicable laws of the State of 10. The Lessor will have a perfected security interest in the Units upon filing with the Secretary of State for the State of' and/or the of at the time of acceptance of the Units of an executed UCC-I or other financing statement. Yours sincerely, Signature: Name (PRIN~: Title: Date: Address: Telephone: Form No. 0005-5/93 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION Reference: We are requesting a copy of the minutes of the appropriation meeting during which the funds for this deal were allocated. A copy of this information is necessary to complete the documentation package and to fund the deal. Your ability to return a complete package will ensure timely payment to you. · . Thank you for your assistance.. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION DOCUMENTATION DEPARTMENT Form No. 0043-2194 'EQUIPMENT: RE: INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR LEASED EQUWMENT Per the Installment or Leaze agreement between and Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation ('Caterpillar Financial"), it is required that we be provided with insurance coverage in accordance with that agreement as indicated below. X Physical Damage Coverage must show that Caterpillar Financial has been named loss payee for the equipment's replacement value. The deductible must be shown. X Liability Coverage of a minimum of $500,000 or combined coverage for bodily injury and property damage per occurrence. Caterpillar ~:immcial must be named as additional insured. Please notify your agent for the proper coverage, and list his name and location below. Our representative will follow up for confirmation of this coverage. INSURANCE AGENT: PHONE NUMBER: ( ). CONTACT PERSON: IF EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED, WHEN WAS IT DELIVERED? PROCESSING OF THIS TRANSACTION WILL BE HELD PENDING RECEIPT OF THIS INFORMATION. PLEASE FORWARD CERTIFICATE TO: Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, 3322 West End Ave., Nashville TN 37203-1071 Form No. 10034-5/93 ·803 8-GC Consolidated Information Return for Small Tax-Exempt - Governmental Bond Issues, Leases and Installment Sales (Rev. DeSpiser t989) OM8 No t'~S 0720 . ~' Under Section 149(e) P- For calendar year ending 19 ...... [,p,res 05/3t/92 OeOartment Of the Treasury I,.e,na, A.,enue Se,~ce (Use Form 8038-G if the issue price of the issue is $ t00,000 or more.) /~.liil Reporting Authority Check box if Amended Return ~, ~] t Issuer's name i2 Issuer $ employer KlentdtCat~on numOer 3 Num0~f'anc$ street 4 C,ty e~ town. state, and ZiP code ~.1ii|i Description of Obligations 5 Total issue price of all small tax*exempt governmental obligations issued during the calendar year. 6 Check the box that most nearly approximates the weighted average maturity of the obligations: a [~ Less than 5 years b ["] From 5 to 10 years c [-'] More than 10 years . 7 Check the box that most nearly approximates the weighted average interest rate on the obligations: a O Less than 5% ' ' * * b ('"]' From 5% to 10% · c ('-I More than 10% ..... 8 Total issue price of the obligations reported on line 5 that are:. * * a Obligations issued in the form of a lease or installment sale ...... ' .... ' ...... I b Obligations designated by the issuer under section 265(bX3XBXiXIII) .......... ! 8b · I I 8c I c Obligations issued to refund prior issues ................... · d Loans made from the proceeds of another tax*exempt obligation , , ,, I 8d Please Sign Here Under penalties of perjury. I declare t~tat I have examined this return and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and Ocher. they are true. correct, and complete. · i ~ Signature of officer · . Date ~)) Type or print name and htle General Instructions " (Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted.) Paperwork Reduction Act Notice We ask for this information to carry out the Internal Revenue laws of the United States. We need it to ensure that you are complying with these laws. You are required to give us this information. The time needed to complete and file this form varies depending on individual circumstances. The estimated average time is: Recordkeeping . Learning about the law or the form . Preparing the form. . Copying, assembling, and sending the form to IRS . 3 hrs., 21 min. · 1 hr., 34 min. 2 hrs., 37 min. .16 min. If you have comments conCerning the accuracy of this time estimate or suggestions for making this form more simple, we would be happy to hear from you. You-can write to either the Internal Revenue Service. Washington. DC 20224, Attention: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, T:FP; or the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1545-O720). Washington. DC 20503. Item You Should Note A governmental unit is required to file this form for all small tax-exempt governmental obligations on which it pays interest. These obligations include bonds, leases and installment sales. Purpose of Form Form 8038-GC is to be used by issuers of tax-exempt governmental obligations to provide IRS with the information required by section 149(e) and to monitor the requirements of sections 14 ]. through 150. Who Must File Each issuer must file Form 8038-GC for all tax-exempt governmental bonds, leases and installment sales issued during the calender year, with an issue price of less than $100.000. Form 8038-G is filed to report each issue of governmental obligations with issue prices of $100.000 or more. When To File File Form 8038-GC on or before February 15th after the close of the calendar year m which the issue is issued. Form 8038-GC must be completed based on the facts as of the close of the calendar year. Late filing.--A Form 8038-GC filed after the due date may be granted an extension of time to file under section 3 of Rev. Proc. 88-10, 1988-I C.8.635, if it is determined that the failure to file in a timely manner ~s not due to willful neglect. A late Form I 1/2/92 Put)lashed by Tax Management Inc.. a Subsidiary of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 8038-CC. I I%,m 803~1-~C '¢~e~v 10.89) 8038.GC should be sent to: Internal Revenue Serv0ce. Phdadelphia Service Center. Statistics of Income Unit. P:OA: Unit F-SOl. Philadelphia. PA t9255. Stop =335. Type or print at the top of the form. 'This Statement Is SubmItted tn Accordance wIth Rev. Proc. 88-10.' Attach to the Form 8038-GC a letter briefly setting forth the reasons why Form 8038-GC was not submitted to the IRS on time. and also indicating whether the obligation in question is under examinabon by the IRS. On not submit copies of any bond documents, leases or installment sale documents. Where To File File Form 8038-GC with the Internal Revenue Service Center. Philadelphia. PA 19255. Definitions · A tax-exempt obligation is not limited to the formal issuance of bonds. It also includes installment purchase agreements and financial leases. · A tax-exempt governmental obligation is a tax-exempt obligation that is not a private activity bond. · A private activity bond is generally an obligation issued as part of an issue of which: (1) More than 10% of the proceeds are to be used for any private business use; and (2) More than 10% of the payment of principal or interest of the issue is either secured by an interest in property to be used for a private business use (or payments in respect of such property), or is to be derived from payments in respect Of property (or borrowed money) used for a private business use. An obligation is also considered a private activity bond if the amount of the proceeds to be used to make or finance loans (other than loans described in section t41(cX2)) to certain persons exceeds the.lesser of 5% of the proceeds, or $5.000.000. Private activity bonds should be reported on Form 8038. Information Return for Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues. · · Issue --Generally. separate obligations should not be treated as part of the same issue if the obligations are not issued by the same issuer, on the same date. and pursuant to a single transaction (or series of related transacbons). With respect to draw-down loans, all amounts reasonably expected to be advanced within :3 years of the date of the first draw may be treated as part of the same issue if the draws are equally and ratably secured by the same loan agreement and are pursuant to a common financing arrangement. All obligations that are issued pursuant to a single finance lease or installment purchase agreement may be treated as part of the same issue if all of the property covered by that agreement is reasonably expected to be delivered within :3 years of the date of issue of the first obligation. Specific Instructions Part I.--Reporting Authority Amended Return.mir you are filing an amended Form 8038-GC. check the amedded return box and complete Part I and only those parts of Form 8038-GC you are amending by entering the correct information. On not file an amended Form 8038-GC'to amend estimated amounts you previously reported once the actual amounts are determined. (See the Part II instruction, below.) ' ' Line 1.--The issuer's name is the name of the entity issuing the obligations, not the name of the entity receiving the benefit of the financing. In the case of a lease or' installment sale. the issuer is the lessee or purchaser. Line 2mlssuer's employer identification number (EIN).--If the issuer does not have an employer identification number, enter 'none' and attach a completed Form SS-4, Application for Employer Identification Number. to Form 8038-GC. If. howeverL the issuer has previously applied for such a number, attach a statement giving the date of the application and the office where it · was submitted. Part II.--Description of Obligations This part may be completed based on information readily available to the issuer at the close of the calendar year, AddtU, o~al If~b'uctlone tO Fm, m ~]3.1,-GC, Co~aolklmted Infm'matkm Return for Small Tax-Exempt G~vemment Bond lalu, el. I.~m W Ifln~lhd"l~ ~ (Rev. O~tober 19,~9) Announoe~t~ent ~-147 Pursuant to T.D. 1428. Information Reporting for Tax- Exempt Bond L~ues. 1992-36 LR.B. 7, [ssue~ of govern- mental be~d i.~ues that have an L~ue price of le~ than $100.000 zed U~t are not private actJvit7 bond~ have an opLioe of meetmg the inforn~aUoo reporting requJrement~ by filing a Form 8038-GC separately for each sruaU issue. ,La ~ muzt file · Form t03a-GC on a coe.~oUdated bash for au sa,aU g~eramental boat. I~ue~ L~ued durLqg the · zme caleod.~r :Fear for whlcfl iaJora~tioo was not reported on · ~parate return. A Forl~ 1031-CC' filed separately mu.~t be filed fin later than ~e 15~ dar o! me ~coad calendar moeU~ after the close of the calendar quarter ia which the L~ue i~ L~ued. A Form 80~8-C,C filed o~ a coe.~oUdated basu mu~t be flied no supplemented by estimates made in food faith. All entries may be based on food ** faith approximations .... *' .', *'~. ,,** . · , Line 5.--Enter the total issue price of all small tax*exempt governmental obligations issued during the calendar year, Sm·Ii governmental obligations means those with an issue price of less than $100,000. If the obligations are reoffered to the public by an intermediary, the issue price is the reoffering price (excluding accrued interest). ' ........ The issue price of an obligation means the principal amount due on the obligation and does not include interest paid or to be paid. Therefore line 5 should include only the principal amount due on obligations sold during the calendar year. For example, only the purchase price of an asset acquired pursuant to a lease should be included on .'Line .5 and only in the year such lease is entered into. A lease or installment Sale is treated as issued on the date interest starts to accrue. Line 6.--The weigfi'ted average maturity is the average maturity on the obligations. With respect to bonds, each bond should be' weighted to its par value. For a lease or" installment sale. enter the total number of years the lease or installment sale will be outstanding. Line 7.~ The weighted average interest · rate is the average interest rate on the obligations. Each bond should be weighted in proportion to its par value and its length of maturity. :' Line 8.~Enter the total issue price of the obligations reported on line 5 that are described on lines ga. 8b. 8c, and 8d. Mbre than one Ii'ne may apply to a particular obligation. For example, obligations issued to refund prior issues which were designated by the issuer under section 265(b)(3)(BXi)(lll) should be reported on line 8b a;qd line 8c. _ Signature Form 8038-GC must be signed by an authorized representative of the issuer. Also" print the name and title of the person signing the Form 8038-GC. " later thin February lSLh of the calendar year foUowing the calendar year in which the issue ts issuecL U the iq:sue of which the bond is a pa.,-t was issued during the tiz~t or Second calenda~ quarters of 1992. however, the de·dUne for filing a Form 8038-GC separately ts extended unril November 18. 1992. For filing a Form 803t-G4~ Mpa* rarely for boftds i~sued during the third quarter of 1992. the filing deadline remains November 16. 1992. i~d [ssuers that choose to file a separate return may adapt and file the 1989 revtsiofl or Form 8038-.GC until a new revtsioa is released. To adap~ the 1989 revisien of Form 8038-C,C for separate filing, the ieauer should (1) strike the word *'¢oo~Uda~-,d" in the clue. and (2) strike ~e $ of the torn and write '*issue price of the small tax-exemp~ govern* mental obUgaUon*' in irs place. Ls:mer~ that desire to file on a consoUdated ba.~s need not alter the 1989 revision of Form 8038-*GC ia any way. U the issue ts · cotuu'uctioa issue ·nd · irrevocable elecOoo to pay · penalty in lieu of arbitrage rebace h,u been made no or before the date ~he bonds were L~. continue to follow the guidel~es cont,·mad in Rev. Proc. 92-22. 1992-12 I.RB. :13. rot amending Form e038--CC. 8O38-CC.2 Published by Tax Management Inc.. a Subsidiary of The Bureau of National Affairs. Inc. !t/2/92 ITEM NO. 9b DATE: December 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE UKIAH VALLEY GENERAL PLAN SUMMARY: On June 10, 1995, the City Council conceptually approved the Draft Ukiah Valley General Plan, and certified its integrated Environmental Impact Report (EIR). These actions came after two months of special Council hearings on the Plan, and after many revisions were directed by Council. Indeed, due to the voluminous nature of the Draft General Plan, and the many changes made to the working document over a period of time, the Council decided to have staff make all the necessary corrections and revisions, then return for a final adoption action. This final action was scheduled for a Council hearing on September 20, 1995, at which time it was concluded that numerous additional revisions (Continued on pages 2 & 3) RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution approving and adopting the Ukiah Valley General Plan. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Further revise the draft Plan, and adopt it with the understanding that staff will make the necessary corrections without returning to Council. 2. Defer adoption of the General Plan, and remand to staff for corrections as may be articulated by City Council. Appropriation requested: N/A Citizen advised: Legal Notice posted and advertised Requested by: City Council Prepared by: Robert Sawyer, Planning Director Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: Draft Council Resolution adopting Plan (Note: The Draft General Plan was distributed to Council on 11/17/95) Candace Horsley, City ~lanager Page 2 needed to be made, and the item was tabled until such time as staff could review and make all the supplemental and necessary corrections. Accordingly, after reviewing the notes and recollections of numerous sources, including most notably Councilman Malone and County Planner Pam Townsend, staff is satisfied that the complete litany of Council-directed corrections have been made, and that the final General Plan, as distributed for the subject hearing, can be adopted. To assist Council in reaching a decision on this subject, various parts of the Plan contain shaded and strike-out text which respectively reflect all of the added and deleted text directed by Council over the course of earlier deliberations. The textual revisions previously directed by Council can be found throughout the Plan, and generally they amount to isolated additions or deletions to the Findings, Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures. No particular theme emerges in reviewing the majority of changes, although some programs got diluted or deleted due to financial considerations and fiscal constraints, and some outdated text had to be revised to reflect current conditions. However, the "Air Quality" sub-chapter contained at the end of the Open Space and Conservation Element does contain rather substantial modifications. Such changes are largely the result of trying to limit the air quality findings and goals to statistics, standards, and information germane to the Ukiah Valley, and to modify or delete the information which was derived from, or relates to State-wide statistics or research material. In so doing, staff believes that the Council's previously expressed concerns over the air quality section will have been addressed, and a more accurate reflection of the area's air quality will have been included for future review and consideration. Once the Council adopts the Plan, staff will ferret out and correct any existing format problems, such as disjointed tables or figures, presented by the strike-out / shaded sections, and then print a "clean" and continuous version of the Plan for future use and distribution. Aisc, the adoption date shown at the bottom of each page of the draft Plan, currently shown as September, 1995, will be updated to the accurate date. It is worthy to note that in the intervening time between the latter Council hearings on the General Plan and the September 20th hearing, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) found our Housing Element to be in legal compliance with State housing law. Moreover, due to time constraints associated with pending Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund applications, it was decided to have the Housing Element independently adopted by Council so as to expedite the State's certification of the Element. Adoption was accomplished at the November 1, 1995, Council meeting, and the Element has been forwarded to the State for certification. Consequently, Council review and adoption of the remaining General Plan would exclude the already-adopted Housing Element. As the Council is aware, a draft Airport Master Plan has been distributed for review, and contained within this Plan is a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP), which proposes compatible land use patterns for properties near the airport and potentially affected by Page 3 airport operations. Staff has compared the draft CLUP patterns with those contained in the draft General Plan, and has found some inconsistencies, although many existing uses surrounding the airport are inherently inconsistent with the CLUP. In any case, the CLUP and the General Plan must be consistent, and it will be incumbent on staff to articulate any inconsistencies presented by the CLUP once the Airport Master Plan is forwarded to Council for adoption, which will likely be in January or February of 1996. In the meantime, it is staff's strong conviction that the General Plan should be adopted as presented, and that any inconsistencies with the CLUP be resolved when the Airport Master Plan is considered. Finally, this last iteration of the General Plan does not contain the previously inserted (11x17- inch) land use maps, although they will be made for, and inserted into the adopted version of the Plan. Unfortunately, staff encountered reproduction difficulties associated with the departed General Plan consultant's computer files, and the decision was made to forgo the smaller maps until such time as a final General Plan is adopted, and only one last set of changes need to be reflected on the smaller maps. It is suggested therefore that Council rely on the large-scale maps, which will be displayed by the staff table, in affirming or revising the various proposed land patterns in the City and Planning Area. Once Council decides on a final land use map, the smaller version will be reproduced and inserted in the adopted version of the Plan. WINWORD/SAWYER/ASRGP.DOC RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH APPROVING AND ADOPTING UKIAH VALLEY GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, 1. The Draft Ukiah Valley General Plan ("Draft General Plan") was developed in accordance with State of California laws pertaining to general plans, and the "State General Plan Guidelines" (published and maintained by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research), and, therefore, is considered to be consistent with all applicable legal requirements and mandates; and 2. The Draft General Plan constitutes a comprehensive revision of, and amendment to the adopted "City of Ukiah General Plan", which was originally adopted in June, 1974, and amended throughout the years; and 3. The Draft General Plan contains an integrated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that satisfies all the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and adequately addresses all the subjects, topics, and issues required of a general plan-level EIR; and 4. The integrated EIR was reviewed throughout the Draft General Plan deliberations, and certified by the City Council on June 10, 1995; and 5. The Draft General Plan contains fourteen elements (including the previously adopted Housing Element; adopted on November 1, 1995), in addition to introductory, explanatory, and definitive text, and each element has equal weight with all others, and all elements reflect internal consistency; and 6. The Draft General Plan is comprised of the seven elements mandated by the State of California (Open Space, Conservation, Noise, Safety, Housing, Transportation & Circulation, Land Use), and these seven elements contain findings, goals, policies, and implementation measures sufficient in quantity and quality to guide the orderly growth, development, and use of the City and the Ukiah Valley for the next 20 years; and 7. The Draft General Plan is also comprised of seven additional and optional elements which are unique to the planning needs of the Ukiah Valley (Parks & Recreation, Energy, Airport, Community Facilities, Historical & Archaeological Resources, Community Design, Economic Development), and these seven elements contain findings, goals, policies, and implementation measures which further qualify, quantify, and organize the orderly growth and development of the City and the Ukiah Valley; and 8. The Draft General Plan was crafted over a four year period by nearly 200 citizens, including the City Council-appointed Growth Management Steering Committee (GMSC) and fourteen individual Element Committees, representing Valley-wide interests, organizations, and constituencies, and therefore reflects to the greatest extent possible, the long term planning goals, values, and expectations of the citizens who work, recreate, and reside in the City and the Ukiah Valley; and 9. The City of Ukiah Planning Commission provided the legally required notice and conducted public hearings and deliberated the contents of the Draft General Plan over a five- month, thirteen-meeting schedule, amended said document in various ways and numerous places, and determined on April 12, 1995, by a unanimous vote (5-0) to recommend that the City Council certify the integrated EIR and adopt the Draft General Plan, as amended; and 10. The City Council provided the legally required notice and conducted public hearings and deliberated the contents of the Draft General Plan over a two-month, eight- meeting schedule, amended said document in various ways and numerous places; and 11. The City Council concluded its hearings on June 10, 1995, having conceptually adopted the entire Draft General Plan, as amended; and 12. The City Council has established land use designations for the City and its adopted Sphere of Influence (also known as "Planning Area") as set forth in two large display maps, respectively marked "Exhibit A - City Land Use" and "Exhibit B - Planning Area Land Use" and dated December 6, 1995, which accurately reflect the land use designations described in the Land Use Element of the subject Draft General Plan; and 13. The findings contained in the Draft General Plan satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby approves and adopts the Ukiah Valley General Plan, including the two "General Plan Maps". PASSED AND ADOPTED on December 6, 1995, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Fred Schneiter, Mayor Cathy McKay, City Clerk WlNWORD/SAWYER/APPR ES .DOC daphne macneil Ukiah City Council Ukiah City Hall 300 Seminary Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 December 4, 1995 Dear I know you will voting soon on parts of the Ukiah General Plan. I urge you to take a strong stand to protect our air quality. Please be sure that this invaluable resource is given careful consideration and attention in the General Plan and that it is in no way compromised. Thank you, Daphne Macneil 817 north oak street ukiah, ca 95482 P. 02 G~~ Pmss , O~ Adopted by the City Council December, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Table of Contents 4, Page a Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................... I. 1-a Figures ...................................................... I.l-d Tables ........................................................ I.l-e Explanations .................................................... I. 1-f Preface ...................................................... I.l-1 1 City's Preface .............................................. I. 1-2 2 Comments from the Chair of the Growth Management Steering Committee ...... I. 1-3 3 The Planning Commission's Preface ................................ I. 1-3 4 The City Council's Preface ...................................... I. 1-5 II. Introduction ................................................... II. 1 What is a General Plan? ........................................ II. 1-1 1-1 1.01 The purpose of the General Plan ............................... II. 1-3 1.02 General Plan legal requirements ............................... II. 1-7 The General Plan Revision and Growth Management Program ............... II.2-9 2.01 Community involvement .................................... II.2-9 2.02 How the General Plan becomes part of the Community ............... II.2-10 The General Plan ........................................... II. 3-12 General plan mandated contents and issues ........................... II.4-13 III. The Vision .................................................... III.0-1 Community workshops ........................................ III.0-1 The Vision Statement .......................................... III. 1-1 Overall General Plan and Growth Management goals and policies ............. III.2-3 3.01 Summary of major £mdings .................................. III.2-3 3.02 Overall General Plan/Growth Management goals and policies ............ III.2-3 The Resource Elements ............................................ IV. 1-1 1 Open space and conservation ..................................... IV. 1-1 1.01 General principles ........................................ IV. 1-1 1.02 Russian River ........................................... IV. 1-4 1.03 Creeks and streams ....................................... IV. 1-7 1.04 Hillside development ..................................... IV. 1-10 1.05 Water resources ....................................... IV.l-12 1.06 Agriculture ........................................... IV. 1-18 1.07 Native plants and animals .................................. IV. 1-22 1.08 Scenic corridors ........................................ IV. 1-26 1.09 Urban open space ....................................... IV. 1-27 1.10 Air quality ............................................ IV. 1-28 2 Noise .................................................... IV. 2-1 2.01 General discussion of noise .................................. IV.2-1 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califoml- Table of Contents 4, Page b 2.02 Transportation noise ....................................... IV. 2-5 2.03 Stationary source noise .................................... IV.2-11 2.04 Community noise levels ................................... IV. 2-20 Safety .................................................... IV. 3-1 3.01 Seismic safety and geologic hazards ............................ IV. 3-1 3.02 Flooding, dam inundation, high groundwater ...................... IV.3-6 3.03 Fire and wildland fire protection and prevention .................... IV.3-9 3.04 Police services and public safety .......................... IV.3-14 Energy ................................................... IV.4-1 4.01 Overview .............................................. IV.4-1 4.02 Land use .............................................. IV.4-1 4.03 Transportation .......................................... IV.4-2 4.04 Site planning and landscape design ............................. IV.4-4 4.05 Building design .......................................... IV.4-5 4.06 Energy Suppliers ......................................... IV.4-6 Vo Infrastructure elements ............................................ V.l-1 1 Airport ................................................... V.I-1 1.01 Introduction ............................................ V. 1-1 1.02 Summary of major findings .................................. V. 1-1 1.03 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs .............. V. 1-9 2 Parks and Recreation ........................................... V.2-2 2.01 Existing parks and recreation facilities ........................... V.2-2 2.02 Valley-wide park and recreation issues .......................... V.2-9 2.03 Park security and maintenance ............................... V.2-10 2.04 South of Washington Street ................................. V.2-11 2.05 Orr Creek-Wagonseller Neighborhood Park ...................... V.2-13 2.06 Orchard Park .......................................... V.2-14 2.07 Riverside park ......................................... V.2-15 2.08 Community gardens ...................................... V.2-17 2.09 Community recreation facilities and activities ..................... V.2-18 2.10 Walking, hiking, and equestrian trails .......................... V.2-19 2.11 Bicycle paths, routes, and lane ............................... V.2-25 Historic and Archaeological Resources .............................. V.3-1 3.01 Governmental decision-making ................................ V.3-1 3.02 Publicly-owned property .................................. '.. V.3-6 3.03 Commercial areas ........................................ V.3-7 3.04 Privately owned historic resources ............................. V.3-9 3.05 Community education ..................................... V.3-13 Community Facilities and Services ................................. V.4-1 4.01 Drinking water supply ..................................... V.4-1 4.02 Sewage disposal and wastewater treatment ........................ V.4-4 4.03 Public health and medical care ................................ V.4-6 4.04 Public facilities for the community ............................. V.4-8 4.05 Public Education ......................................... V.4-9 4.06 Cemetery District ....................................... V.4-11 Circulation and transportation .................................... V.5-1 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI. Table of Contents 4, Page c 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 The role of transportation issues in project review ................... V.5-1 Alternative modes of transportation ............................. V.5-8 Parking .............................................. V. 5-14 Rail transportation ....................................... V. 5-16 Levels of service ........................................ V.5-18 Street classifications ...................................... V.5-25 Neighborhood Traffic Management ............................ V.5-31 Future street and circulation patterns ........................... V. 5-31 Major circulation improvements to the existing street system ........... V.5-39 Development Elements ............................................ VI.l-1 1 Housing ................................................ VI. 1-1 1.01 Introduction ............................................ VI. 1-1 1.02 Population projections and build-out ............................ VI. 1-1 1.03 Public Participation ....................................... VI. 1-4 1.04 Evaluation of previously certified Housing Element .................. VI. 1-4 1.05 Community profile ...................................... VI. 1-11 1.06 Inventory of land suitable for residential development ................ VI. 1-15 1.07 Housing affordability ..................................... VI. 1-22 1.08 Special groups needs assessment .............................. VI. 1-23 1.09 Housing needs plan ...................................... VI. 1-29 1.10 Availability of services and infrastructure-. ....................... VI. 1-35 1.11 Market and inventory conditions .............................. VI. 1-37 1.12 Other governmental constraints and opportunities ................... VI. 1-40 1.13 Non-governmental constraints ............................... VI. 1-42 1.14 Appropriateness of goals, objectives, and policies .................. VI. 1-42 1.15 Wrap-up ............................................. VI. 1-42 1.16 Conservation of affordable housing ............................ VI. 1-46 1.17 Rehabilitation and maintenance of existing housing .................. VI. 1-47 1.18 Housing mix .......................................... VI. 1-50 1.19 Home ownership opportunities ............................... VI. 1-51 1.20 Construction of affordable housing ............................ VI. 1-52 1.21 Meeting special housing needs ............................... VI. 1-56 1.22 Jobs-housing balance ..................................... VI. 1-57 1.23 Non-traditional housing styles ............................... VI. 1-58 1.24 Housing Element review ................................... VI. 1-59 1.25 Fair housing and anti-discrimination ........................... VI. 1-60 2 Community Design ........................................... VI.2-1 2.01 Design guidelines and standards ............................... VI.2-1 2.02 The Ukiah Valley setting .................................... VI.2-4 2.03 The "Gateways'' . ........................................ VI.2-5 2.04 Agricultural and scenic area character ........................... VI.2-7 2.05 A sense of place ......................................... VI.2-7 2.06 Signs ............................................... VI.2-14 2.07 Special design issues ..................................... VI.2-15 3 Economic Development ........................................ VI.3-1 3.01 The Community Vision: Available opportunities and community direction . . . VI.3-1 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California Table of Contents ~, Page d 3.02 The Community's needs: Continued economic growth ................ VI.3-3 3.03 Opportunities for the future: Economic Development Strategy ........... VI.3-5 Land use ................................................. VI.4-1 4.01 Introduction ............................................ VI.4-1 4.02 Legally Existing Non-Conforming Land Uses ...................... VI.4-3 4.03 Land use policies ......................................... VI.4-7 4.04 Resource lands ......................................... VI.4-12 4.05 Residential Land Use ...................................... VI.4-15 4.06 Economic development land uses ............................. VI.4-21 4.07 Recreation and public land uses .............................. VI.4-28 VII. Glossary .................................................... VII.4-44 VIII. Appendices ............................................... VIII.4-1 Wildlife and botanical inventory and supplemental information .............. VIII.4-3 Figures Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure II. l-A: II. l-B: II. 1-C: II. l-D: IV.l-E: IV.2-F: IV.2-G: IV.2-H: IV.2-I: IV.2-J: IV.2-K: Regional location map -- Mendocino County and the City of Ukiah ........ II. 1-2 General Plan Planning Area .................................. II. 1-4 Ukiah City Limits (1994) .................................... II. 1-5 Sphere of Influence proposed by the General Plan for LAFCo approval ...... II. 1-6 Sources of water rights ............ . ........................ IV. 1-15 Noise measurement sites .................................... IV.2-2 Traffic noise contours -- 1990 and 2010 .......................... IV.2-3 Distance to 60 dB L,~ Contour (Arterial Traffic) ..................... IV.2-4 Existing railroad noise contours ................................ IV.2-8 Fixed noise source contours ................................. IV.2-13 Existing average annual day CNEL airport noise contours ............. IV.2-17 IV.2-L: Existing peak day (fire fighting activities) CNEL airport contours ........ IV.2-18 IV.3-M: Location of Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones ..................... IV.3-3 IV. 3-N: Lake Mendocino Dam Innundation Area .......................... IV. 3-7 IV.4-O: Sources of City power supply ................................. IV.4-7 V. l-P: Location of airport combining zones for the Airport Land Use Plan ........ V. 1-10 V.2-Q: County and Federal park and recreation lands ...................... V.2-1 V.2-R: 12t~ District Fairgrounds ..................................... V.2-3 V.2-S: Russian River access points and river-area parks ..................... V.2-4 V.2-T: City of Ukiah's Neighborhood Parks ............................ V.2-5 V.2-U: City park and recreation facilities in the Todd Grove/Golf course area ...... V.2-6 V.2-V: Downtown area park and recreation sites ......................... V.2-7 V.2-W: Ukiah School Sites ........................................ V.2-8 V.2-X: "South of Washington" neighborhood as used in the General Plan ........ V.2-12 V.2-Z: Riverside Park existing facilities .............................. V.2-15 V.2-AA: Location of the Conceptual Trail Routes and connection with County trails.. V.2-24 V.2-BB: City designated bicycle routes ............................... V.2-26 V.2-CC: Planning Area designated bicycle routes ........................ V.2-27 V. 3-DD: Areas of high archaeological sensitivity .......................... V.3-2 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJl, Mendocino County, California Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Table of Contents ~, Page e Figure V.3-EE: Location of Historic buildings, landmarks, and resources in the Planning Area and City of Ukiah ..................................................... V. 3-11 Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure V.5-FF: Future roads and road extensions - City of Ukiah .................. V.5-34 V.5-GG: Future roads and road extensions -- Planning Area ................. V.5-35 V.5-HH: Route concepts in the City and Planning Areas (map does not show alignment or precise route) V.5-36 VI. 1-II: City of Ukiah Population Trends and Projections .................... VI. 1-2 VI.2-JJ: Redevelopment Area ..................................... VI.2-10 VI.2-KK: Downtown Master Plan Area ............................... VI.2-11 VI.2-LL: City of Ukiah Historic Neighborhood boundaries .................. VI.2-13 VI.4-MM: Land Use classifications within the City; North Area (overlaps other maps) .......................................................... VI.4-30 VI.4-NN: Land Use classifications within the City; Central Area (overlaps other maps) .......................................................... VI.4-31 VI.4-OO: Land Use classifications within the City; South Area (overlaps other maps) .......................................................... VI.4-32 VI.4-PP: Land Use classifications within the Planning Area; North Area (overlaps other maps) VI.4-33 VI.4-QQ: Land Use classifications within the Planning Area; Central (overlaps other maps) .......................................................... VI.4-34 VI.4-RR: Land Use classifications within the Planning Area; South (overlaps other maps) ........................................................... VI.4-35 Tables Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table II.4-1: General Plan contents checklist ................................ II.4-13 IV. 1-1: Water storage capacity, Russian River system ...................... IV. 1-15 IV. 1-2: National and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (1994) ........... IV. 1-31 IV.l-3: Ozone Data for the Ukiah Valley 1980-1993 (ppm) .................. IV.1-35 IV. 1-4: Ukiah Valley TSP and PM~0 Data 0~g/rn3) ......................... IV. 1-36 IV. 1-5: Summary Annual Emission Inventory for Mendocino County (1991) ....... IV. 1-38 IV. 1-6: Phase II Motor Vehicle Fuel Specifications ........................ IV. 1-39 IV.2-6: Traffic Noise Contour Data distance (feet) from center of roadway to L,~ contours ........................................................... IV.2-6 IV.2-7: Railroad line operational information and estimated noise levels ........... IV.2-7 IV.2-8: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure Transportation Noise Sources ........ IV.2-9 Table IV.2-9: Noise Level Performance Standards for projects affected by or including non-transportation sources ..................................................... IV.2-10 Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table IV.3-10: Slope Conversions and Development Considerations .................. IV.3-4 IV.4-11: Ukiah sources of electricity .................................. IV.4-7 V.2-12: Park facilities and acreage ................................... V.2-2 V. 3-13: Official historic listings ..................................... V. 3-9 V.4-14: Sampling of Community meeting rooms .......................... V.4-8 V.4-15: Valley Schools ........................................... V.4-9 V.5-16: Segment Level of Service based on Average Daily Traffic ............. V.5-18 V.5-18: City and County Functional Service Classifications .................. V.5-30 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1, Mendocino County, Califoml= Table of Contents ~, Page f Table V.5-19: Table V.5-20: Table VI. 1-21: Table VI. 1-22: Table VI. 1-23: Table VI. 1-24: Table VI. 1-25: Table VI. 1-26: Table VI. 1-27: Table VI. 1-28: Table VI. 1-29: Future roads and road extensions .............................. V.5-32 Planning Area freeway interchanges ............................ V.5-32 Population and Minority Data ................................ VI. 1-1 Ukiah and Planning Area Population Projections .................... VI. 1-3 Population displayed by Household Type ........................ VI. 1-10 Housing Stock Inventory ................................... VI. 1-11 Housing units by type 1970-1990 ............................. VI. 1-12 Reported Value of Owner Occupied Units 1990 .................... VI. 1-12 Household Income City of Ukiah ............................. VI. 1-13 Poverty level by household income and family size ................. VI. 1-14 Summary table of Vacant land within the City limits suitable and zoned for residential use VI.l-15 Table VI. 1-30: Inventory of undeveloped land within the City of Ukiah suitable and zoned for residential use ........................................................ VI. 1-16 Table VI. 1-31: Parcels with residential potential currently designated for commercial use ... VI. 1-20 Table VI. 1-32: Monthly Rent of Housing Units .............................. VI. 1-22 Table VI. 1-33: Assisted units inventory ................................... VI. 1-24 Table VI. 1-34: Approved projects ....................................... VI. 1-29 Table VI.1-35: Affordable housing type, density, and land needs for the City of Ukiah during the short- term planning period ............................................. VI. 1-30 Table VI. 1-36: Regional Share Housing Need Targets for Ukiah by Fiscal Year 1997 ..... VI. 1-31 Table VI. 1-37: Table VI. 1-38: Table VI. 1-39: Table VI. 1-40: Table VI. 1-42: Table VI .4-42: Table VI .4-43: Table VI.4-44: Percent rentals in rent ranges ........ . ........................ VI. 1-32 Major employers in the greater Ukiah area ....................... VI. 1-35 Utility connections fees .................................... VI. 1-39 Development and application fees ............................. VI. 1-40 Quantified Objectives ..................................... VI. 1-43 Urban Residential Land Use Siting ............................. VI.4-11 Land Use/Zoning Criteria in Rural Communities* .................. VI.4-27 Population Density and Building Intensity ........................ VI.4-36 Explanations Explanation IV. 1-I: Definition of Open Space from California law ................... IV. 1-1 Explanation IV. 1-II: Storm water discharge measurements ....................... IV. 1-12 Explanation IV. 1-III: "Right-to-Farm" regulations ............................ IV. 1-19 Explanation IV. 1-IV: Oak woodlands ..................................... IV. 1-23 Explanation IV.2-IV: Noise Element definitions .............................. IV.2-1 Explanation V. 1-V Accidents involving aircraft, 1982-1991 ....................... V. 1-4 Explanation V. 1-VI: Airport closure examples ................................ V. 1-7 Explanation V.2-VII: The "Quimby Act" and "in-lieu" fees ...................... V.2-10 Explanation V.2-VIII: Requiring trail dedications -- the "new" standard .............. V.2-20 Explanation V.5-IX: "Street" vs. "road," a guideline ........................... V.5-2 Explanation V.5-X: Impact fees and the "rational nexus" . ........................ V.5-3 Explanation V.5-XI: Level of service definitions ............................. V.5-19 Explanation VI: 1-1: Example of City Financial Assistance Toward Home Purchase ....... VI. 1-53 Explanation VI.2-XIV: Applicability of this section of the Element .................. VI.2-1 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, California Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Table of Contents 4, Page g Explanation VI.2-XV: Applicability of this section of the Element ................... VI.2-4 Explanation VI.2-XVI: Applicability of this section of the Element .................. VI.2-6 Explanation VI.2-XVII: Applicability of this section of the Element .................. VI.2-7 Explanation VI.2-XVIII: Applicability of this section of the Element ................. VI.2-8 Explanation VI.2-XIX: Applicability of this section of the Element ................. VI.2-12 Explanation VI.2-XX: Applicability of this section of the Element .................. VI.2-14 Explanation VI.2-XXI: Applicability of this section of the Element ................. VI.2-15 Explanation VI.4-XXII: Summary of policies for legally existing, non-conforming land uses ........................................................... VI.4-4 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJl, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 1.1. Preface 4, Page 1 HE GENERAL PLAN for the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley is dedicated to the mem, of Stan Hildreth. Stan's love of the Ukiah Valley is well known to the many whose lives he touched. His long hours of public service, self-sacrifice, and good deds are manifest in many of the aspects of the Valley that today's and tomorrow's families know and will ome to know. As a member of the Open Space and Conservation Citizen Advisory Committee and a regular attendee participant at the meetings of the Growth Management Steering Committee, Stan's knowledge, experience and sage counsel are represented throughout the General Plan. It is a fitting tribute tca man those who knew will sorely miss. The Growth Management Steering Committee, October 10, 1994 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, Califomi~ 1.1. Preface ~, Page 2 I ClTY'$PREFACE THE City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley is an effort born of community GENERAL for the ~energy and desire. It represents a commitment by the Ukiah City Council and the Mendocino l¢ounty Board of Supervisors to prepare a comprehensive and long range planning tool that ~represents the foresight of the people who live and work in the Valley. More than a mere City General Plan, this document provides policy programs that are proposed to be used in coordination with the City and County. The General Plan's foundation came from community meetings in the Fall, 1990, attended by hundreds of people representing all aspects of life in the Ukiah Valley. From these meetings, individuals came to consensus and commitment that this is indeed a fine place to live and work, and that efforts are needed to maintain and enhance those qualities that make the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley a quality place to live. These beliefs are expressed in the "General Plan Vision Statement" upon which the entire General Plan is built. The many members of the volunteer Citizen Advisory Committees and the Growth Management Steering Committee have proven that the people most affected by a General Plan are those best suited to write the concepts that will go into that Plan. The fourteen Citizen Advisory Committees each worked on a different General Plan element -- and one committee worked on two elements. More than one hundred and fifty people participated in the efforts to bring the Vision Statement into policy programs that can be carried out day-in and day-out. These committees worked for nearly a year in developing overall goals and policies to be incorporated into the General Plan. Their concepts and beliefs have generally been held throughout the General Plan process. The effort of bringing all parties in the community together rested with the nearly forty members of the Growth Management Steering Committee. This Committee has developed a Plan that is realistic and is a document that can be proudly presented to the community. While the General Plan is before the Planning Commission and City Council there are going to be new suggestions, recommendations, alternatives, disagreements, and possibly controversy.., that's an essential part of community planning and the democratic process. The General Plan represents the work of nearly 200 people between the Citizen Advisory Committees and the Growth Management Steering Committee. Each volunteer was drawn from a broad cross-section of the entire community -- both in the City and in the Valley. Most important the General Plan is tempered by California law, decisions in the court system, and the "big picture." This City should be proud of the overall efforts of the Growth Management Steering Committee and the "big picture" it has created. The Steering Committee has met the commitment of the hundreds of participants in the Visioning Process by providing a constitution for development and a blueprint for the future. The General Plan ultimately adopted by the Council varies little from the efforts of the citizen volunteers. The Planning Commission invested many meeting fine tuning the General Plan into a tool that provides them with firm direction and effective management tools for project review. The Commission worked with the reccomendations of the Growth Management Steering Committee and considered many Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 1.1. Preface 4, Page 3 other issues in reviewing the Plan. The Planning Commission provided the polish necessary to send a truly citizen-driven citizen-supported document to the City Council. The City Council invested its time in more public sessions to review and consider the recommendations and input of the Growth Management Steering Committee, the Commission, and the public at the hearings. The final General Plan represents a collaborative effort of citizen planning and policy development. The future vision of Ukiah is achievable with this level of commitment. 2 COMMENTS FROM THE CHAIR OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE completed an arduous, yet rewarding task of developing a comprehensive General Plan for the Ukiah Valley, and, as the Chairman for the past two years, I want to extend my personal thanks to each and every member for their dedication, commitment, hard work, and personal sacrifice over these past four years. I sincerely believe that we crafted a meaningful and reasonable guide for the growth, protection, and use of the Valley, and I feel certain that the residents and visitors to our community will be well served by its "vision" for many years to come. Clearly, our General Plan is a result of much dialogue, debate, and discourse, as well as an underlying spirit of compromise and cooperation, and I am hopeful that the Committee is proud, as I am, of the f'mAshed product. In my mind, the late Stan Hildreth symbolizes the Committee's efforts, which were honest, straightforward, laden with integrity, and extended in an unselfish manner for the overall betterment of the Valley and the community. As you recall, Stan attended many, many meetings before his passing, and, along the way, provided the Committee with support, insight, and a patient and friendly voice of reason. I will miss Stan, as I'm sure you will too, and I would like to dedicate our new General Plan to his memory and to his family, all of which hold the people, cultures, and environment of the Valley in the highest regard. Last, I would also like to extend a personal thanks and note of appreciation to our support staff of Bob Sawyer, Eric Toll, Pam Townsend, and especially Kari Revheim. It would seem to me that we were in competent hands throughout the process, and, without Kari's organizational skills and hard work, I doubt that we could have remained on such a straight and steady course. Chair, Growth Management Steering Committee October 10, 1994 3 THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S PREFACE The City Planning Commission spent five months, thirteen special meetings, and nearly fifty hours discussing, deliberating, and revising the Draft Ukiah Valley General Plan. This exercise was sometimes contentious, sometimes tedious, sometimes frustrating, and always challenging. But overall, the Commission feels that it was a wholly worthwhile and meaningful effort, and that the entire Ukiah Valley will be a better place to live, work, and recreate as the vision of the Plan unfolds, and its implementation measures become reality. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, Califomic I. 1. Preface ,e, Page 4 The Planning Commission worked hard on the draft Plan, but, in the end, the Plan was left basically and functionally intact from the Growth Management Steering Committee's final version, many changes were made, but they may be best characterized as refinements of pre-existing goals, policies, and implementation measures, rather than wholesale modifications to the themes and precepts presented in the text, and formulated over nearly four years by so many citizens and committees. The doctunent was, and remains, truly representative of the citizens of this Valley, and the Planning Commission's actions represented the citizen-drive nature of the process. While the document was not changed in an grand or profound way as a result of the Commission's involvement, it would nevertheless be misleading and inaccurate to deduce that the Commission was in full harmony on various issues, or that individual Commissioners did not have viewpoints that substantially deviated from the Steering Committee's recommendations. Indeed, difference of opinion were expressed in regards to such important and recurring matters as private property rights, growth boundaries, design review, historical review, environmental considerations, fiscal considerations, and generally, the Plan's relationship to the community's needs. In the final analysis, however, the Planning Commission takes pride in the final product, and is pleased to have been a part of the review process. We are anxious to see the document adopted so that we can set about working on the many ordinances and guidelines associated with the implementation measures. Estok Menton Chair, City of Ukiah Planning Commission April 12, 1995 Adopted by the City Council: Septen~ber, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJl, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 1.1. Preface 4, Page 5 4 THE CITY COUNCIL'S PREFACE ON BEHALF OF THE UKIAH CITY COUNCIL, I would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the citizens who participated in crafting the new Ukiah Valley General Plan, with a special note of thanks to the members of the Growth Management Steering Committee (GMSC) for their extreme dedication, perseverance, and hard work. The process took over four years to complete, and it is well recognized by a grateful Council how much personal sacrifice by each GMSC member is reflected in the final document. The Council is also mindful and appreciative of the valuable input provided by countless other citizens who participated in the process and contributed constructive ideas at public workshops, GMSC meetings, and Commission and Council hearings. After receiving the revised document from the Planning Commission, the City Council conducted eight special public hearings and deliberated the Plan over a two month period. The Council made numerous revisions along the way to virtually all of the Plan's 14 Elements, but essentially left intact the programs and policies which best seemed to represent the community's long-term needs and goals. Even though the Council exercised its discretion and dismissed certain programs, policies, and measures, especially due to fiscal constraints and realities, we nonetheless remain confident that the prinicipal themes and visions contained in the Plan were respected and accepted for the most part. We therefore believe that the 1995 Ukiah Valley Gen6ral Plan will provide the guidance and vision needed for the orderly growth and development of the City and the Valley. Moreover, we believe that the Plan's comprehensive and farsighted nature will provide such guidance and vision well into the twenty-first century. Honorable Fred Schneiter Mayor, City of Ukiah September 7, 1995 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program I1.1. What is a General Plan? 4, Page I I WHATISAGENERALPLAN? ALIFORNIA LAW REQUmES each City and County to adopt a comprehensive and long-term General Plan to define how the area will develop over the next twenty years. The General Plan has been referred to as the "constitution" or "blueprint" for development. It provides the long-term and comprehensive policy program for all aspects of development, growth, and use in the Ukiah Valley. The City of Ukiah and its location in Mendocino County are shown in Figure II. 1-A on page 2. The law requires that a General Plan address seven broad topics called elements. Each element focuses on a specific set of issues, but at the same time ranks in equal importance with the other elements. The General Plan is the ultimate legal control over issuance of building permits, approval of new subdivisions, use permits, general development, and even the acquisition, construction or expansion of City and County facilities. The General Plan represents the City Council's and Board of Supervisors' policy programs. The Plan provides guidance to the Planning Commission and Staff and is the foundation upon which all development and building regulations are based. The Ukiah General Plan revision and Growth Management program is more comprehensive than just a development program. The Plan is intended to meet the needs of the City Council for the incorporated City and its sphere of influence. It is also intended to[~:~ ~:~ ~: ....~..:.~....~ ~.~:~:~:~:~:~ :....~:~:~ meet the needs of the Board of Supervisors for the Plan addresses the important beliefs about how the[ ~~~!ii]l::::::: : ::: ::: : : :::::: ::: ::: : ::::: ::: : ::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::: : ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::iiii!iiiii~iii~i~i~i~iii!iiiii~i!iii~i~iiii~Ii~i~iiiiiiiii~i!i~iIIiiiiii!i!iIiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iii!i!I~iiI!iiii!!i~!i~iiiiiii!iii~i!ii.i.ii ............................................ area will grow as determined by those who live and work in the Valley. It proposes goals and policies for not only the City proper but the entire unincorporated Valley -- subject to Board of Supervisors concurrence. The General Plan represents a compilation of dreams, aspirations, instructions to the future, and the reasons why each is important to the area. To provide the legal mechanisms of making the General Plan work for the people of the Valley, the dreams are converted to statements called goals. The aspirations become the City Council's -- and potentially Board of Supervisors' -- policies or policy direction to its staff. The instructions for the future will be spelled out as implementation measures. So that in the future people will under~tand why the City and possibly the County took these actions, the reasons are spelled out as summaries of major findings. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program I1.1. What is a General Plan? 4, Page 2 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi- MeN Itoaport Layt~mvHle Weslport 0 Covelo0 Mendocino Count~~, Fort BraSS Mendocino Potter Valley~ Redwood Valley ~" \ Litde River Albion ~b"'°° Ukiah dr Boonville © mige~.~ Hopland Point Azena Gualala REGIONAL MAP No Scale Los Ange Figure II. f-A: Regional location map ~ Mendocino County and the City of Ukiah Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program i1.1. What is a General Plan? 4, Page 3 The General Plan is divided into four major components -- the Overall General Plan Goals and Policies, the Resource Elements, the Infrastructure Elements, and the Development Elements. Each of the fourteen Ukiah elements fall under one of these four components: Overall General Plan Goals and Policies: Not technically an element, this component contains goals and policies that define the Vision Statement (See Chapter III) and form an umbrella over the entire General Plan. Resource Elements: (1) Energy Element, (2) Noise Element*l, (3) Open Space Element*, Conservation Element*, and (4) Safety Element*. Infrastructure Elements: (5) Airport Element, (6) Community Facilities and Services Element, (7) Historic and Archaeological Resources Element, and (8) Parks and Recreation Element. Development Elements: (9) Circulation and Transportation Element*, (10) Community Design Element, (11) Economic Development Element, (12) Housing Element*, (13) Land Use Element*, and the (14) Fiscal Impact Assessment. f. Of The purpose of the General Plan The a policy to used by cities and counties to direct development over General Plan is document be a long-term period in a comprehensive manner. The role of a General Plan differs from a regulatory program -- such as a zoning ordinance or subdivision ordinance -- because its job is to provide the "big picture" of long-range development and 'capital improvement programs. The General Plan describes how the community will appear in twenty years. The zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance implement the goals and policies of the General Plan and directly control development. The process for developing a general plan has evolved since the mid-1950s into a series of requirements guided by a combination of state mandates through legislation, regulatory requirements through the California Code of Regulations, and court decisions, also called case law. To assist local governments in preparing a General Plan, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has developed a document called the General Plan Guidelines to provide all agencies with its interpretations of the various General Plan requirements. In the Guidelines, OPR defines that "[al general plan provides a basis for rational decision making regarding a city's or county's long-term physical development. ,,2 The legislative charter for General Plans states the document's purpose to be to provide for "the physical development of the ... city, and any land outside its boundaries which in [its] judgement bears relation to its planning. ,3 ~Elements marked with a printer's cross (?) are the seven State-mandated elements. 2Office of Planning and Research, State of California General Plan Guidelines (North Highlands, CA: Department of General Services, Publications Service, November, 1990), p. 5. 3California Government Code (GC) §65300. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program I1.1. VVhat is a General Plan? 4, Page 4 Planning Area ! OF I I I City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, Califoml-- Figure II. l-B: General Plan Planning Area Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program I1.1. What is a General Plan?'4, Page 5 CrTY OF U~. ~ General Plan Reviszon [.~~& Growth Management Program KIAH CITY LIMITS I I One Mch · I,eoe Feet Ad.ted September, l~)S Figure II. f-C: Ukiah City Limits (1994) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program II1i. What is a General Plan? ~, Page 6 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, Califoml= Planning Area City Limits SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ! ! I I I Figure II. f-D: Sphere of Influence proposed by the General Plan for LAFCo approval Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Il[Il Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program I1.1. What is a General Plan? 4, Page 7 1.02 General Plan legal requirements The imposed requirements on the contents of a General Plan. It has State has certain minimum identified seven elements that must be addressed. The Legislature has indicated that other elements are optional at local discretion. Most important, the law requires that "...the general plan and elements and parts thereof comprise an integrated, internally consistent and compatible statement of policies for the adopting agency.'4 Internal consistency means that each element and all of its components have equal weight in the eyes of the law. This means that the General Plan cannot skirt areas of controversy in one element by avoiding decisions or making either/or comparisons in another element. The ~' example states "...the land use and open-space elements cannot contain different land use intensity standards rationalized by statements such as 'if in any instance there is a conflict between the land use element and the open-space element, the land use element controls'."5 The General Plan must grasp the issues and provide a distinct and direct resolution. 1.02.01 Mandatory elements The seven mandatory elements are defined in the law as Land Use, Circulation, Open Space, Conservation, Housing, Noise, and Safety. Each has certain requirements for its minimum contents. The State, however, provides some degree of flexibility in element content. The Legislature directed that "...planning agencies and legislative bodies implement this article in ways that accommodate local conditions and circumstances, while meeting its minimum requirements."6 Utilizing this flexibility, elements can be combined. The Ukiah General Plan consolidates the Open Space and Conservation Elements into one element. In addition, some of the requirements for mandatory elements have been separated into independent elements for the City's General Plan. The issues associated with sewer, water, and public infrastructure are separated from the Land Use and Circulation Elements to the Community Facilities Element. Park and recreation issues are separated from Open Space and Land Use element requirements and are discussed in the Parks and Recreation Element. 1.02.02 Optional elements State law permits local government to add any number of optional elements. The law states "[t]he general plan may include any other elements or address any other subjects which, in the judgment of the [City Council] relate to the physical development of the of the city or county. ,7 The Ukiah General Plan revision and Growth Management program adds a number of optional elements. These are: Airport, Community Design, Community Facilities, Economic Development, Fiscal Impact, Historic and Archaeological Resources, and Parks and Recreation. The Ukiah General Plan has a total of fourteen elements. 4GC§65300.5. 5Sierra Club v. Board of Supervisors of Kern County (1981) 126 Cal.App.3d 698. 6GC §65300.7. 7GC §65303. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program I1.1. What is a General Plan? 4, Page 8 City of Uklah l~ M®ndocino County, California 1.02.03 Environmental review California has a requirement that prior to any governmental agency taking action on a General Plan, it must first or concurrently complete an environmental analysis of the project. This requirement is contained within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEO_A).8 The administrative requirements for implementing CEQA are established in Title 14 of the California Code of regulations, known as the State CEQA Guidelines. The City authorized preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) that was integrated into the General Plan during the adoption and hearing process. For final publication, the EIR was removed in order to provide for a complete and comprehensive General Plan. One purpose of an EIR is to provide decision-makers with an understanding of the long-term environmental consequences if they were to adopt and carry out the General Plan. Another purpose is to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on both the General Plan and its environmental impacts. The EIR is a disclosure document. Its preparation, responses to comments, and certification results in the decision-makers furnishing a written record of the reasons supporting their decision. The General Plan was prepared with a consolidated environmental impact report certified by the City Council on July 19, 1995. 1.02.04 The area covered by the General Plan The General Plan covers three differing areas. The primary focus is within the City limits or incorporated area. The other two boundaries are within the unincorporated area. One is the Sphere of Influence, the adoption of which is briefly described on page 9. The third limit is the Planning Area. The City limits cover the lands currently within the City of Ukiah. This incorporated territory is governed by the five person City Council in a Council-Mayor-Manager form of government. This means that the Mayor is elected separately from the City Council members.9 General administration and day-to- day operations are directed by the City Manager who is II::iiiiiiiiii!!iiii'"": ii!iiiiiiii!ili appointed by the Council. The City of Ukiah is a general law municipality, principally governed by the requirements of State ~:"'~;:::":::::::::: law in conjunction with its local ordinances.'° Land use matters within the City are reviewed by a Planning Commission appointed by the City Council to oversee use permits, development permits, variances, and other discretionary permits that are approved by quasi-judicial actions. Development proposals that are considered legislative actions, such as the General Plan and its amendments, the zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and other policy documents, must also be approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning Commission. The Council may also appoint other advisory bodies to make decisions or provide the Council with recommendations. Figure II. 1-C shows the City Limits at the time the General Plan was adopted in 1995. aPublic Resources Code §21000 ET SEQ 9This differs from a Council-Manager government, in which the Mayor is elected from among the members of the City Council. ~Fhe other type of City is a "charter city," in which the laws that govern the City are enacted directly by voters. The City is run with a constitution called a "charter." San Diego and Los Angeles are charter cities. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 11.2. The General Plan Revision and Growth Management Program process ~, Page 9 California law requires that each City have a Sphere oflnfluence to represent the ultimate limits to which the City will extend its services, embrace new territory, and anticipate its growth over the next twenty years. The City proposes a new Sphere of Influence in] ~ the General Plan and submits the selected boundaries to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAF¢o) for approval. The proposed Sphere of Influence map is Figure II. 1-D. State law requires that a Sphere of Influence be adopted if a City wants to consider any annexations. Later policies in the General Plan define territories proposed to be annexed by the City during the short- term planning period (the period from one to five years after adoption of the General Plan). Although the City Council and Board of Supervisors do not have a standardized tax sharing agreement, and the Ukiah City Council has not implemented an "aggressive" annexation policy, the Preliminary General Plan identifies areas in which the City can better serve the businesses and residents. Mendocino County controls land use within the Sphere until it is annexed by the City. The Planning Area (See Figure II. I-B) represents the total area studied for the General Plan. This boundary, which encompasses the Ukiah Valley and includes the City of Ukiah, is entirely within the unincorporated County. The purpose of utilizing such a large lIiii~iiii!~i~iiiii~ii~iii!iiiiii~ii~iii~i~i~i~.....:`~iiiiiii~i~ii~i~i!~ii~i~i!~i~iiii::::::~:~:~iii~iiiii~i~!~?:~i~i~.:..:~i~i~i~!~i~i~iii. Planning Area is to provide a comprehensive and consistentI !] l~ii!i~ii~iI!!~ii!iiiiiiiIi~iiiIiii!i~iiii~iiii~i~!ii!iiii~i~i~!iiiii!iiii~!~[~!i~i policy program for development that can be used by both the City and the County. The County Board of Supervisors has indicated it will consider adopting the General Plan policies related to the Planning Area as an Area Plan to be a part of the Mendocino County General Plan. The Planning Area includes lands which are unlikely to be annexed within the next twenty years, but in which development influences or impacts the City and its residents. The Planning Area is an area in which the City and County are likely to cooperate to provide quality public services and facilities. 2 THE GENERAL PLAN REVISION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM D 2.0 Community involvement URING THE SUMMER and fall of 1990, people who call the Ukiah Valley their home and place of business decided they needed to come together and develop a shared picture of the City's future. To best accomplish this objective, the City Council authorized a revision to its General Plan. While General Plans are required by State law, the City's approach was to use the process to achieve a greater community consensus and participation. In order to include a broad cross-section of people and ideas, the City initiated a process to prepare a citizen-driven General Plan revision and Growth Management program. This process involved nearly 130 people working on Citizen Advisory Committees. To provide the foundation for the General Plan, a series of public workshops were held in late 1990 and early 1991. From these sessions, members of the community created a wish-list for the future. This lengthy list resulted in the draft Vision Statement presented in Volume III of the General Plan. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah · Mendocino County, Califomi=, 11.2. The General Plan Revision and Growth Management Program process ~, Page 10 2.02 How the General Plan becomes part of the Community The work of the separate committees was presented to the 35-member Growth Management Steering Committee (GMSC) for consolidation into a single General Plan document, as well as issue-by-issue review. When the GMSC completed its review -- which included extensive input from the pub- lic -- it sent a complete General Plan, called the Preliminary General Plan, to the Planning Commission. In Spring 1992, three workshops were hosted by the Citizen Advisory Committees to present an opportunity for members of the public to examine the proposed goals and policies, together with the reasons the different Element Committees believed these issues tointerestedbe important.membersTheofWOrkshopsthe communitypr°vided a sessiOnpresented comments,at which interpretations, or suggestions for enhancement directly to the Element Committee members. The Workshops successfully provided opportunities to listen, gather ideas, and rework or polish the elements. The materials presented were recommendations proposed by the various element Committees. The work of the Citizen Advisory Committees was combined with legal requirements, other recommendations, and direction from the Steering Committee to form the Initial Version of the Plan. The Initial Version represented a working version of the General Plan from which the Steering Committee concentrated its review to prepare the Citizen-driven version of the General Plan..The Steering Committee worked on the Initial Version Plan from June, 1992 through August, 1994. The Initial Version provided a "first cut" by the Steering Committee so that the group could take a look at all the work of the Citizen Advisory Committees and incorporate its views into the process. The lengthy debates, discussions, and decisions were completed on July 26, 1994. Over a concentrated period on August 8, 9, and 10, 1994, the Growth Management Steering Committee reviewed its work and sought concurrence to pass its recommendation of the General Plan to the Planning Commission and the public. This document, called the Preliminary Version of the General Plan and Growth Management Program (Preliminary Plan) represents the Steering Committee's work. The Committee seeks adoption of the Plan by the Planning Commission, City Council, and the County. The Preliminary Version of the Plan is the first "official" General Plan document prepared in this process. It is presented to the Planning Commission for its review, hearings, and recommendations. At the Planning Commission stage, the General Plan as proposed by the Growth Management Steering Committee was combined with a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). This provided the Planning Commission with an assessment of the General Plan's impacts on the Ukiah Valley environment was also presented with options and alternatives to the recom-[~lil ] ~.'.Y~:i:~:!: :i:: :::!: :!ill i:! i ! F. i !:! ~: :!~:i:i:~:~:!:::::.: .... mended policy directions in the Preliminary Plan. The ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ==================================================================== alternatives were generated from options which were discussed but not selected through the Growth Management Steering Committee's review. This approach ensured that the Planning Commission had knowledge of the various opportunities and options which were discussed, not only those selected. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 11.2. The General Plan Revision and Growth Management Program process ~, Page 11 The Planning Commission conducted two public hearings and eleven deliberation sessions over a five month period. In the process, the Commission invested nearly fifty hours reviewing and revising the text. This phase began in November, 1994, and ended with the official action adopting the Draft General Plan on April 12, 1995. The Planning Commission made many changes to the text originally submitted by the Growth Management Steering Committee. These changes are identified throughout the document with and a "red-line" highlight through the new or revised text. To gain a view of the GMSC's version without the Planning Commission's changes, one must read the unaltered text plus the stricken text. Following the Commission's action on April 12, 1995, the Draft General Plan and an accompanying Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) were sent to the City Council. The Council held public hearings and deliberation sessions in May, June, and July, 1995 preceding adoption on August 16, 1995. It reviewed the Plan, considered !~iiii~iI~iiii~iiiiiii!iii~i!ii!iiiiii~i~iiiii~i!iiIiiiIii~!~iii~iiii!!i~i!!iiiiIIiiiiIIiiii!iiii~iiii~ii~!iiiIiiIiii~!iiIiiiii~i~!ii comments and alternatives, examined the options selected and ii~i~iii!~i!~i~iiii~iiiiii~iii~!~!~!~iii~iiiii~I~i!i!i!iiiiiii~ig~Ii~~I~ implementation, responses to comments, and the fiscal results of implementing the Plan. The Council balanced all of the administrative record of options and certified the Environmental Impact Report on June 10, 1995, prior to adopting the Final General Plan and Growth Management Program. Following the City's adoption of the General Plan, there are a number of additional steps that must be taken. The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors is committed to reviewing the Plan for consid- eration of its adoption by the County as an area plan or special I I:~:!"'::i:!:i: ::: = ::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :"':':' ' ':';':' ':';':':':':':':':':';';':':':':':':':':':': takePlan thisf°r the unincorporated lands within the Ukiah Valley. To step, the City of Ukiah General Plan, as adopted by the City Council, must tn'st be reviewed and considered with at least one public hearing by the Mendocino County Planning Commission and then considered with at least one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. One of the components of the General Plan is an identification of the Sphere of Influence. The Sphere is a boundary that represents the ultimate City limits for the City of Ukiah. The Sphere of influence is proposed in the General Plan but must be approved by the LAFCo is an independent body created in State law. The Mendocino County Local Agency Formation Commission. Commission has the power to approve or deny annexations, incorporations, or formation of most special districts. LAFCos also must approve spheres of influence for all cities and special districts. A city cannot annex land that is not a part of its sphere. When the 1981 version of the General Plan was adopted, the sphere of influence was basically the entire Ukiah Valley. During the process of preparing the 1992 revision to the General Plan, it was determined that this boundary area was too large for a sphere of influence. The Steering Committee will define a sphere as part of its review of the Initial Plan. There are other participants in the adoption of the General Plan. The California Department of Housing and Community Development must review the Housing Element. The California Division of Mines and Geology must review the mineral resource components of the Open Space, Conservation, and Land Use elements, and it must also review the Safety Element. The :.~: :.:i:~:! i ~:~ ::::::::::::::::::::::: :'"" ":':' ":: ::':':::':'::!:' ' ' "' :::::::::::::::::::::::: :':':::':':'"' '::':::~;::::'::: ::::: ::::: ::':: ::: :~:~ Mendocino County Water Agency, special districts providing :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ...... :~:~:~ ..... ::::::::::::::::::::::: fire protection, sewer, and water service in the Plan area must also consider its implications on the growth and ability of the Districts to serve their existing and future populations. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California 11.3. The General Plan ~, Page 12 In 1990, a joint task force of Valley public agencies was created to provide a comprehensive and consistent program of service to the public. These agencies prepared a task force report that was adopted and released in August, 1992. The Valley Wide Task Force prepared recommendations for the distribution and consolidation of public service delivery in the area. These recommendations are incorporated into the Community Facilities Element. Some of the districts or agencies may need to take an action related to the implementation of the General Plan. 3 THE GENERAL PLAN THE OF adopted first General Plan in 1974. The adoption signified a compilation CITY UKIAH its of separate work on General Plan elements during the early part of the 1970s. Between 1974 and 1981, various amendments -- predominantly to make land use map changes -- were adopted. On November 30, 1981, the City Council adopted a comprehensive and long-term General Plan that has guided the City since that time. The Noise Element was updated in December, 1982. A Community Facilities Element was added in 1983. Recreation and Community Design, Community Facilities, Circulation-Transportation, Scenic Highways, and Land Use elements were amended in 1983. The Housing Element was last updated in 1985, as required by law. The revision program that started in 1990 will result in a comprehensive adoption of a new General Plan replacing the 1981 Plan as it has been amended. The General Plan is organized into nine basic General Plan components and one related to the Environmental Impact Report. These are the (1) Preface, (2) Introduction, (3) The Vision, (4) Resource Elements, (5) Infrastructure Elements, (6) Development Elements, (7) Fiscal Impact Analysis, (8) Appendices, and (9) Glossary, additionally, in the transmitted Draft General Plan/Final Environmental Impact Report, there are (10) Responses to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report. The Preface and Introduction, Chapters I and II, provide information about the role of the General Plan, its adoption and hearing process, and its requirements. Chapter III, The Vision, provides the Vision Statement, its relationship to the overall General Plan goals and policies, and information related to amending and updating the General Plan. The General Plan elements are contained in Chapter IV, Resource Elements, Chapter V, Infrastructure Elements, and Chapter VI, Development Elements. Chapter VII, the Fiscal Impact Analysis provides an assessment of the financial impacts of each applicable implementation measure. Chapter VIII, the Appendices, reproduces supporting data and information that helped the City establish its implementation programs. Chapter IX, the Glossary, defines significant terms used in the General Plan. Within each chapter of the General Plan, the elements are divided into sections by issues addressed within the element. Within the issues, there are two sections: Summary of major findings, and General Plan goals, policies, and implementing program. These two sections contain important information critical to understanding the General Plan's contents. The "Summary of Major Findings" section briefly explains the reasons behind the decisions that make the goals important. Sometimes the Summary contains factual data either because it is required by law or needed to support the reasons. Many times, the information in the summary represents the beliefs of the citizens participating in the process. The "General Plan goals, policies, and implementing program" section contain the programs that will put the General Plan into effect. This section forms the Plan action program and is the direction that the Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 ,City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 11.4. General plan mandated contents and issues 4, page 13 City must follow once the Element is adopted. To understand what is meant by each, the following explanations are used in the General Plan as a consistent de£mition of the words. Findings. Findings are the reasons that a recommendation is being presented as a goal. A finding represents the thought process, the reasoning, and any relevant supporting factual evidence that provide a means for a reader of the General Plan to understand why a particular goal is proposed. Findings are presented as "summaries of major Irmdings'' within the Plan. Goals. Goals are broad statements that provide the blueprint for the future. Each goal establishes what the City desires to accomplish over the life of the Element. Goals are what the community desires to achieve. Policies. Each goal is further defined by City Council policies. The policies provide direction to Staff, the public, and future councils as to how each project is to be reviewed under the provisions of the Element. A policy breaks the goal into achievable segments. Implementation measures. In order to put the Element into day-to-day effect, implementation measures are adopted to provide guidance in reviewing projects and to define standards which are to be achieved. For the most part, implementation measures are time specific or measurable standards. Time specific implementing measures tell the Council that a certain action is to be accomplished at a specific time. This assists in settling budgets for City Deparanents (such as the Roads Department or Planning Department). Measurable implementation measures tell Staff which standards of review are to be used on an ongoing basis when assessing a project for approval. Planning periods. Implementation of the Plan is carried out through a series of planning periods. The short-term planning period covers the time from adoption through the fifth anniversary of the Plan's adoption. The intermediate-term planning period is six to ten years following adoption. The long- term planning period runs from eleven years through the end of the General Plan horizon, its twentieth anniversary. Figures, tables, and explanations. "Figures" are maps and graphics that are used to reflect information in the Plan. "Tables" incorporate data used in the Plan. "Explanations" are notes generated as further explanation of issues. 4 GENERAL PLAN MANDATED CONTENTS AND ISSUES TATE LAW SETS THE MINIMUM SCOPE of issues which the seven mandatory elements of a general plan must address. State law, however, provides flexibility in the method of presenting the required minimum scope of issues. The Ukiah General Plan establishes fourteen elements. Within these fourteen elements, all of the state required issues are addressed. Table II.4-1 provides a matrix that shows each of the required issues from General Plan law and in which element or elements the issue is addressed. Table 11.4-1: General Plan contents checklist Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 11.4. General plan mandated contents and issues ~, Page 14 Mandatory Element Issues Key to Column 1: · k - Applies to City of Ukiah ~, - Applies to the County of Mendocino O - Applies to City and County X - Not applicable to this General Plan Shaded columns are the State-mandated elements Distribution of housing Distribution of business Distribution of industry Distribution of open space Distribution of agricultural land Distribution of significant mineral resources Distribution of recreational facilities and opportunities Location of educational facilities Location of public buildings and grounds Location of future solid waste facilities Location of future liquid waste facilities Identification of areas subject to flooding Identification of existing Timberland Preserve Zones Major thoroughfares Transportation routes Terminals Other local public utilities and facilities Areas for preservation of natural resources vegetation wildlife habitat fish habitat Areas for ecologic and other scientific study City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California Areas for managed production of resources Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 forest lands rangeland agricultural lands commercial fisheries City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Mandatory Element Issues Key to Column 1: ,k - Applies to City of Ukiah '~ - Applies to the County of Mendocino O - Applies to City and County X- Not applicable to this General Plan Shaded columns are the State-mandated elements Areas for recharge of ground water basins Areas containing significant major mineral deposits Areas for outdoor recreation scenic areas historic areas areas of cultural value park and recreation areas links between recreation and open space areas Areas for public health and safety hazardous areas protection of water quality protection of air quality fuel break and reduction zones helispots fire access Demands for trail-oriented recreational use Water and its hydraulic force Forests Soils Rivers and waters Fisheries Wildlife Minerals Mineral Issues Other natural resources Water Program Identification and appraisal of major noise sources Existing and projected levels of noise Existing and projected noise contours Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 11.4. General plan mandated contents and issues ~, Page 15 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 11.4. General plan mandated contents and issues 4, Page 16 Mandatory Element Issues Key to Column 1: · k - Applies to City of Ukiah ~r - Applies to the County of Mendocino O - Applies to City and County X- Not applicable to this General Plan Shaded columns are the State-mandated elements Determination of extent of 'noise problems" Methods of noise attenuation Protection of residences from excessive noise City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, Califomi~, Protecting community from unreasonable risks seismic events slope instability geologic hazards flooding wildland and urban fires Standards for known fire and geologic hazards evacuation routes peakload water supply requirements minimum road widths clearances around structures Existing households and housing units Lower income households overpaying for housing Special housing needs groups Overcrowded households Housing units needing rehabilitation Housing units needing replacement Five-year projected new construction needs Revision of COG regional housing needs justification Employment and population trends Land inventory Housing constraints Quantified objectives Public participation of all economic segments Analysis of opportunities for energy conservation Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJli, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 11.4. General plan mandated contents and issues 4, Page 17 · *, - Applies to City of Ukiah ~) e. ._e o ',,= ~' - Applies to the County of Mendocino ~ me I~. p :~:~.'..':i:~:~:~ i::::::::::::::: :::::.'::::~:. 0 - Applies to City and County n,' c c .- X- Not applicable to this General Plan~' ~ E E ~= := .~ c° ~E Shaded columns are the State-mandated elements ~ Consistency with other general plan elements Evaluation and revision of the previous element _.'::::i:i:i::.;: i:::i:i: :i:i:::i .':~:i:::~:.;:~:::i Coastal Zone localities required information Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 .City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program II1.1. Communiht Workshops ,~ Page I COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS HE GENERAL PLAN PROCESS started in late 1990 with a series of community workshops designed to learn about what is important to the people who live and work in the Ukiah Valley. The workshops were intended to provide enough information from which a statement about life in the Valley could be prepared. The beliefs and important issues were put together to create a "Vision Statement." After the workshops, the City Council-appointed Growth Management Steering Committee developed the "Vision Statement." All of the many hundreds of issues and suggestions raised during the workshop were combined into five "categories" of similar topics. The Steering Committee met for numerous sessions in the Fall of 1990 and Winter of 1991. Words were debated and assessed, concepts considered for importance and relevance. The Committee completed this first set in the process of preparing the General Plan in February, 1991. The consensus draft of the Vision Statement was presented to the community. The topics of importance were further refined and enhanced by community participation and comments during these meetings. At these workshops members of the community signed up for the various Citizen Advisory Committees. Each Citizen Advisory Committee worked with a copy of the Vision Statement. The objective was to ensure that as the entire General Plan was written, the Citizen Committees strove to keep the goals and policies in the Elements within the framework of the Vision Statement. Each Committee -- as well as the Growth Management Steering Committee -- were directed to relate how a particular goal or policy helped achieve one or more components of the Vision Statement. 2 THE VISION STATEMENT UKIAH'S STATEMENT defines quality of life. The Vision Statement was approved in VISION concept by the Steering Committee at the start of the General Plan process with the intent of tel'ming its language and content when the Plan was completed. The following five paragraphs (not listed in any particular order) comprise the Vision Statement for the City of Ukiah General Plan revision and Growth Management program. The Vision Statement was further defined through goals and policies beginning in Section III.3. Although the Vision Statement and its five components had to be placed in an order to be printed, all five of the components that comprise the Vision Statement are of equal weight and importance in defining what the people of the community want to achieve. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program II1.1. The Vision Statement ~, Page 2 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, Califomi=, The Vision Statement WE ENVISION A creative, mixed economy with both large and small employers, jobs that attract and satisfy our citizens, and businesses that retain dollars within the community We envision development that provides a mix of housing types and prices. We envision thatli~iiiiiiiiiiiiii!iiiiiig~~ii~.,*.:~ii!~~i~~ development of adequate water, sewer and utility resources to Iliil~ilii~ii~iiiiiil~~i~~~iii~il~i] support the future of our valley. We envision industries and ~*~*~:~*~*...**~:***~:*~m~I~::~:*:~.~:~:~:~:::~:.::*:~.~:::~:~:*:~:~:~::~::~ businesses that use our resources wisely, and respect the carrying capacity of our valley. We envision businesses that provide remunerative and rewarding work, and that produce quality products through environmentally sound processes. WE ENVISION CULTURAL, political and social institutions that involve as many citizens as possible in community life, and that interact effectively with one another. We envision a public life that builds upon and encourages the caring, warmth, friendliness, and sense belonging that can be found here. We envision better communi- cation to all our citizens about matters affecting the community. We envision a community that brings people together to share thoughts and feelings and to participate actively in the further development of our valley. WE ENVISION THE conservation of'our natural resources, which are the foundation of the financial well-being of our community. We envision the protection and upgrading of our andair qualitY,our freedom our water fromSUpplY'unnecessary our green traffic spaCe,and[' iiii i ~!ii ~..~*5~!~i~!iiiiiiiiiii!~!ii~i~i~i~!~.:~:55i~i5~:i~i~i~i~i~i5i~i5~:~i5i5i~ 51~?."~i~i~i~5:i~i~i~imm~msmms~5~ noise. We envision the protection of our farmland and the wholesome lifestyle derived from our agricultural tradition. We envision the maximum use of renewable energy, and the minimum use of fossil fuels. W E ENVISION DEVELOPMENT that complements rather than compromises the natural beauty of this valley. We envision pleasant places for people to come together: , beautiful public spaces, streets with greenery and good design, and a downtown plaza. We envision outdoor ]Ii~ilii!ililili/iiii!ii!iiiii!!iiii!i~~ili~I~~i] recreational development, including trees and shady spaces for [~!liilii!!llili!!!i!ii!ii!iii!i!!!ii!iiiii!i!!!ii!iiiii!iiii!! i!iiiiiiiii!~i~~~!ii] people to enjoy. We envision a,~sthetically designed, affordable !ii housing, planned to encourage walking, bicycling, and public transit. We envision the a;sthetic enhancement of commercial development along highways and roads, especially through tree planting. We envision agricultural lands and native greenery in the Valley enhancing and conserving the natural beauty woven into places we go everyday. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 111.2. Overall General Plan and Growth Management Goals and Policies ~, Page :3 W E ENVISION A community which is aware of who and what we are, living intelligently within our limits and in harmony with natural processes. We envision a way of life based on recy- cling and reuse rather than throw-away consumption. We envision convenient public transportation. We envision a community that respects cultural diversity, historical places, and valuable traditions. We envision creative human services and effective public safety. We envision intellectually sound educational institutions that inspire citizenship and academic growth. We envision good places for young people to be and constructive things for them to do. We envision responsive government. And at the heart of everything, we envision a community built on a shared concern for the quality of life that has brought us to this special place. 3 OVERALL GENERAL PLAN AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES U 3.01 Summary of major findings KIAH'S GENERAL PLAN must provide policy leadership for the Ukiah Valley. The Plan's major local purpose is to establish a means of achieving the vision of a Future Ukiah that the hundreds of participants, speakers, and organizations have expressed in this process. In order to achieve this, the General Plan must implement the Vision Statement. It must define the Vision with a series of goals and policies designed to create the future Ukiah envisioned. 3.02 Overall General Plan~Growth Management goals and policies 3.02.01 Sound, stable, community-based economy WEenvision a creative, mixed economy with both large and small employers, jobs that attract and satisfy our children and citizens, and businesses that retain ~ bring in lnew dollars within the community. We envision development that provides a mix of housing types and prices. We envision that development of adequate water, sewer and utility resources to support the future of our valley. We envision industries and businesses that use our resources wisely, and respect the carrying capacity of our valley. We envision businesses that provide remunerative and rewarding work, and that produce sound products through environmentally sound processes. Goal GP-I: Goal GP-2: Promote, attract or assist in developing businesses, particularly those that add value to resources already found or processed in the Ukiah Valley. Promote business development, emphasizing local ownership of businesses in order to keep capital and growth within the community. Policy GP-2.1: Establish programs to nurture growth and prosperity of the valley job base. Policy GP-2.2: Maintain and improve the high quality of environmental and community standards as a means of attracting and keeping large and small employers. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah · Mendocino County, California 111.2. Overall General Plan and Growth Management Goals and Policies ~ Page 4 Policy GP-2.3: Goal GP-3: Policy GP-3.1: Policy GP-3.2: Goal GP-4: Identify those characteristics that support local substantiative businesses, and take the steps necessary to maintain and enhance such characteristics over time. Support-the creation of combined public-private facilities in downtown areas for educational, business, civic, and personal growth purposes. Locate public-private facilities so that they enhance existing downtown businesses. Promote the private development of a Downtown to promote a seven day a week economy. Establish specific criteria for project approval and provide better explanation and clarification of the permitting process. Policy GP-4. I' Develop land development codes and regulations that streamline the permitting process. G Policy GP-4.2: oal GP-5: oal GP-6: oal GP-7: oal GP-8: Coordinate permitting requirements with all other regulatory agencies. The City shall have a one-stop permitting process where possible. Encourage housing in a price range to match the income of residen~ ~..~;,~ ~f ----, ......... Encourage housing for local workers and jobs for current res/dents. Coordinate construction of infrastructure with planning for development. Assure a diverse and healthy natural environment. 3.02.02 Community involvement WEenvision cultural, political and social institutions that involve as many citizens as possible in community life, and that interact effectively with one another. We envision a public life that builds upon and encourages the caring, warmth, friendliness, and sense of belonging that can be found here. We envision better communication to all our citizens about matters affecting the community. We envision a community that brings people together to share thoughts and feelings and to actively participate in the further development of our valley. Goal GP-9: Coordinate connecting of community services, resource persons, and programs and activities. Policy GP-9.1: Facilitate community scheduling, calendaring and communication. Goal GP-10: Ensure that there is an ongoing process of community involvement for the purposes of providing input and monitoring the success of the general plan. Policy GP-lO.l:Planning for facilities for community meetings and activities shall be a City priority. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 111.2. Overall General Plan and Growth Management Goals and Policies ~, Page 5 Policy GP-lO. 2:Develop an ongoing evaluation process which incorporates targeted surveys of community groups (surveys, interviews, community meetings, focus groups). Policy GP-IO. 3.'Increase accessibility of community meetings by developing area-specific agendas with meetings held throughout the community. Policy GP-IO. 4.'Increase the level of participation by utilizing modes of communication that are easily accessible by community media. Policy GP-lO. 5:Improve communication about decisions and implications of decisions arising from community meetings by utilizing all forms of communication. Policy GP-lO. 6.'Ensure a City response to all citizen requests related to citizen involvement activities. G oal GP-11: Promote community training in the areas of facilitation, problem-solving and evaluation as to all aspects of the General Plan and other significant public issues. Policy GP-11./.'Lead and model these skills during the ongoing management of city business. Policy GP-11.2:Collaboration shall be modeled by training city employees in cooperative problem solving and planning skills. Policy GP-11.3:Encourage the development of programs within schools that provide skills and experiences in citizen participation and citizen democracy. G oal GP-12: Ensure that policies and decisions on community growth and development respect our all of community and our diversity of cultural heritages in order to enhance overall quality of life. Policy GP-12./:Support celebrations that recognize our community's identity and cultural traditions. Policy GP-12.2:Support commemorative activities which honor past events or individuals which have contributed to the betterment of the community. Goal GP-13: Goal GP-14: Work with interested groups, organizations, and school districts to achieve excellence in education. Goal GP-15: Goal GP-16: Work with interested groups, organizations, and school districts to achieve excellence in providing services and opportunities to youth. Work to reduce cultural and language barriers that prevent citizens from participating in local government and community affairs. Increase voter participation in our democratic process. Policy GP-16./.'Work with organizations which represent diverse non-partisan groups to increase voter turn-out. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, Californi-~ 111.2. Overall General Plan and Growth Management Goals and Policies ~, Page 6 Goal GP-17: oal GP-18: oal GP-19: Work with interested community groups and organizations to help achieve a community free from violence and crime. Plan City facilities for multiple public uses. Encourage public use of City meeting space and other City facilities. 3.02.03 Responsible use of resources WE envision the preservation and conservation of our natural resources which are the foundation of the financial well-being of our community. We envision the protection and upgrading of our air quality, our water supply and quality, our green space, and our freedom from unnecessary traffic and noise. We envision the protection of our farmland and the wholesome lifestyle derived from our agricultural tradition. We envision the maximum use of renewable energy, and the minimum use of fossil fuels. G oal GP-20: Maintain and enhance area natural resources balancing the use of the resources, replenishment, and remaining supply. Policy GP-20./:Create natural resource guidelines for use in future planning and development decisions. Policy GP-20. 2:Protect water supplies from adverse impacts. Policy GP-20. 3:Maintain and enhance air quality. Goal GP-21: Conserve open space, hillsides, stream courses, and natural flora and fauna for the enjoyment of future generations. oal GP-22: oal GP-23: Promote reclamation, additional storage, and conservation of water. Conserve agricultural lands to enhance economic vitality and the sustained identity of Ukiah as a rural agricultural community. 3.02.04 /Esthetics in planning and development WEenvision development that complements rather than compromises the natural beauty of this valley. We envision pleasant places for people to come together:, beautiful public spaces, streets with greenery and good design, and a downtown plaza. We envision outdoor recre- ational development, including trees and shady spaces for people to sit and enjoy. We envision ~esthetically designed, affordable housing, planned to encourage walking, bicycling, and public transit. We envision the ~esthetic enhancement of commercial development along highways and roads, especially through tree planting. We envision a greenbelt surrounding the city, and natural beauty woven into the places we go everyday. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 111.2. Overall General Plan and Growth Management Goals and Policies ~, Page 7 Goal GP-24: Conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the Ukiah Valley. Policy GP-24.1 :Work with the County and other entities to ensure that there are a variety of parks, recreational facilities, and points of river access. GoalGP-25: Ensure a~sthetic qualities in the design and construction of the community. Policy GP-25./:Establish a design review system that incorporates specific a~sthetic quality standards for development. Policy GP-25.2:In areas to be developed or redeveloped, ensure usable open space and common spaces. G G Poffcy GP-25.3:Seek ways to return "neighborhood feel" to older residential areas through street, sidewalk, and landscaping improvements. oal GP-26: Require that landscaping be a significant component of development and redevelopment. oal GP-27: Maintain scenic viewsheds of the Valley. 3.02.05 Ecologically sustainable WE envision a community which is aware of who and what we are, living intelligently within our limits and in harmony with natural processes. We envision a way of life based on recycling and reuse rather than throw-away consumption. We envision convenient public transportation. We envision a community that respects cultural diversity, historical places, and valuable traditions. We envision creative human services and effective public safety. We envision intellectually sound educational institutions that inspire citizenship and academic growth. We envision good places for young people to be and constructive things for them to do. We envision responsive government. And at the heart of everything, we envision a community built on a shared concern for the quality of life that has brought us to this special place. G oal GP-28: Make Ukiah a leader in the development of responsible, resource-conserving ways of living and doing business, giving fullest consideration to the impacts of our actions on future generations. Policy GP-28. l:Make this goal central in the CitY,$ program to solicit businesses for the community. Policy GP-28.2:Provide incentives, wherever possible, to environmentally responsible activities, both business and personal. Policy GP-28.3:Model the sustainable use of resources. This shall include investing in comprehen- sive conservation of energy, minimizing polluting activities, and avoiding needless consumption and waste. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California 111.2. Overall General Plan and Growth Management Goals and Policies 4, Page 8 -- . . ~1. ..... :_ 1~--..i ...... ..$ _~_:__ 4.1.~. ..... ~-~--+:~11.. : ........ :!.1 ..... 1. ~ Goal GP-~9: Conserve nonrenewable resources. Policy GP-29.1:Minimize the use of fossil fuels to the greatest feasible extent in all activities including investment in low and zero emission vehicles. Policy GP-29. 2:Encourage the use of low and zero emission alternatives to fossil fuels for all modes of transportation. Policy GP-29.3:Promote public transportation, services within walking distance in neighborhoods, and any other feasible means of preventing needless vehicle use and pollution. Goal GP-30: Protect existing agriculturally zoned lands in the City's Planning Area. Policy GP-30.1.'Recognizing the irreversibility of conversion from agricultural to other uses, require within city limits and urge within the Planning Area that all such conversions be subject to a citizen review process. Policy GP-30.2:Work cooperatively with citizens and organizations to ensure that the siting and design of schools, and State and Federal facilities minimizes the use of, and impact on, agricultural lands. G oal GP-31: Identify ways to replace wasteful practices that imprudently use resources. Policy GP-31./:Establish programs to reduce motor vehicle dependency. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah J~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space' and Conservation 4, Page 1 HE RESOURCE ELEMENTS are a combination of the mandatory and optional elements related to natural and physical resources in the Ukiah Valley. The Elements in this Chapter are Open Space and Conservation, Safety, Noise, and Energy. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION General principles THE CONSERVATION portion of the Open Space and Conservation Element overlaps provisions found in the Open Space, Land Use, Safety, and Circulation Elements. The conservation portions of the Open Space and Conservation Element differ from other portions of the General Plan in that the emphasis is towards natural resources. The conservation component stresses the conservation, development, and utilization of resources. ~ Open space lands differ from conservation activities. Open space lands are essentially undeveloped lands in public and private ownership that are designated for a land use that allows the land to appear rural or open. Lands that are currently open space may include property that will be developed for a resource use, such as agriculture or mineral resources. 1.01.01 Summary of major findings Human, physical and spiritual health depends upon the understanding of and living within the interrelationship of living systems. The community at large can enjoy the open space effect of private General Plan Guidelines, pp. 117-118. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah/1~ Mendocino County, Califomla IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 2 property but must recognize and respect that it is private property when implementing policies. The City can combine development and open space through incentives for innovative projects to preserve vegetation, make wise/frugal use of resources, and generally enhance the environment. Because of the relationship between the overall Ukiah Valley and the incorporated City area, it is intended that the Open Space and Conservation Element apply to both lands within the City limits and the unincorporated area. While most publicly-owned lands that are designated as open space will remain in a public use or undeveloped state, privately-owned lands that may be shown as open space are not generally available for public access without the property owner's permission. 1.01.02 Goal OC-I: Policy OC-I. 1.' General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Recognize private property rights when designating open space lands. Identify all current privately-owned undeveloped parcels within the City's Planning Area so that the larger public is aware of their locations. Implementation Measure OC-1.1 (a): Ensure that the undeveloped lands inventory is updated each year. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,I, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Planning] Implementation Measure OC-l.I(b): Provide information to people interested in learning about how undeveloped lands can be acquired as a means of preserving open space. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Parks and Recreation] Implementation Measure 0C-1.1 (c): When private organizations or public groups seek to acquire open space, provide staff support to answer questions and supply supporting information as needed. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Policy 0C-1.2: Pdt} New residential, commercial, and industrial development shall include open space as defined in the Land Development Code. Implementation Measure OC-1.2(a): The revised Land Development Code2 shall include standards for maintaining open space and green areas within new developments. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,~ Agency/Department responsible: City and County Planning Agencies] Policy 0C-1.3: Coordinate landscaping of public and private development with preservation and restoration of open space and native vegetation. Implementation Measure OC-1.3(a): In the Land Development Code or design standards,3 incorporate requirements for enhancing native vegetation.,,,otv,,,t- ..... .... :A_ and ,, .... "~,'~'-,,t'"'ts~A-'~ .... : .......... ~,,,.,~,,,,,,o. [Timeframe forcompletion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure 2The "Land Development Code" is an umbrella term that refers to ordinances enacted to specify development, building, and subdivision standards. 3Design review standards will either be included in the Land Development Code or adopted as a separate policy-regulatory program. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah/l~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 3 G oal OC-2: applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Planning Agencies] The City of Ukiah shall support the conservation of agricultural lands through formation of a land trust. Policy 0C-2.1: ~ Support the formation of a non-profit private Land Conservation Trust. Implementation Measure OC-2.1(a): During the short-term planning period, the City shall acquisition open space by ~e ~ , facilitate of ~ ~ Conservat~on Trust. ,, ..... :__ ^c__ ....... : .... ' -'- ~- '"~ PlanrJng.~, ^ --~,,,.. [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: General Services] Goal OC-3: Encourage clustering of residential development wherever possible to preserve continuous, unfr~ented natural habitat. Policy 0C-3.1: Establish incentives which promote clustered development as a means of maintaining natural habitat. G Implementation Measure OC-3.1(a): Amend the Land Development Code to incorporate incentives, such as density bonuses, for cluster housing to conserve critical natural habitat. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Planning Agencies] Implementation Measure 0C-3.1 (b): Ensure that the Land Development Code incorporates subdivision design standards to plan for shared or clustered driveways. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: Planning Agencies] oal OC-4: Encourage continuous public participation to monitor the Open Space and Conservation Elements. Policy 0C-4.1: Encourage participation of organizations established for purposes of open space conservancy. Implementation Measure 0C-4.1 (a): Using community relations programs, provide notice and an oppommity for groups to participate in the annual General Plan report to provide views concerning the implementation of the Open Space and Conservation elements. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Planning Agencies] Goal OC-5: Policy 0C-5.1: Provide a system to catalog natural resources within the Planning Area. Develop a resource inventory by coordinating available sources. Implementation Measure 0C-5. I (a): Evaluate and prepare an inventory of existing natural resources on a periodic and systematic basis during the life of the General Plan. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah llJll, Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 4 G The inventory may include encouraging other trustee or responsible agencies to take the lead in developing an inventory in areas of appropriate responsibility, it may include sponsorship of studies found by the Council to be of immediate importance to the City, or it may include City contributions in kind or monetarily, if appropriate, to assist in funding such studies. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning] Implementan'on Measure 0¢-5. I (o): During the short-term planning period, prepare a list of resources to be included in the inventory. This list shall be utilized to develop the systematic program for preparing the inventory. [Timeframe for completion: Short- term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning] In~lementation Measure 0C-5.1(c): The City shall strive to start an inventory of at least one resource identified on its list or in its program every two fiscal years. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Planning] oal 0C-6: Utilize natural resource guidelines in future planning and development decisions. Policy 0C-6.1: To create a balance between the natural habitat and area development, provide guidelines to encourage development styles and techniques that respect the natural terrain, topography, and habitat. Implementation Measure 0C-6. I (a): The Land Development Code shall include provisions for review of the site terrain and natural characteristics as a part of site design and development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period .1, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Planning Agencies] 1.02 Russian River 1.02.01 Summary of major findings The Russian River is a vital recreation resource for the public as well as critical to agricultural use in the Ukiah Valley. Conflicts between these uses shall not be avoided by preventing public uses. Rather the City of Ukiah, Mendocino County and other public agencies shall simultaneously encourage reasonable public use and access and protection of agricultural and other private uses from trespass and vandalism. The Russian River is a significant fisheries habitat, the major flood control channel, and the major source of water for supply and distribution as well as resupply for the underlying aquifer. Historically and today, the river has been a major source of reeds and willows that were gathered by the native American inhabitants of the area, and fabricated into the unique baskets that are now world- famous. Continued urbanization of the Russian River flood plain may result in impacts to the free flow of flood waters, increase exposure of persons and property to flooding, and cause deterioration or destruction of natural riparian habitats. The development patterns within the Valley have also resulted in the conversion of streams and creeks to channelized and tunneled drainage facilities. This destroyed natural habitat has not been replaced. Additionally, the channelization disrupted natural drainage patterns, which Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 5 can result in increased flooding as more impermeable surfaces are created in the Valley. The implementa- tion program in the Plan provides mitigation that is applied to development proposals. The Russian River is a major identified floodway with expansive floodplains on each side of the river's channel. Its historic course has moved from time to time following major floods. The drainage of the river results in the deposit of gravel into the river bottom and along the floodway which provide opportunities for mineral extraction. Mining the Russian River has impacts in terms of changes to the depth of the river, disruption of river flows, and shifts in the banks or course of the channel. The City of Ukiah has direct interest in the quality and protection of the Russian River. The river provides the City's water supply. It serves as a recreation resource. The river is also critical as a part of the City's wastewater treatment system. Agricultural interests, property owners, and governmental agencies all have claims on portions of the river's stream flows for municipal, agricultural, and industrial uses. The river is regulated by the California Department of Water Resources. The Russian River carries significant volumes of water used outside of the Ukiah Valley. 1.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal OC-7: Ensure the health and viability of the Russian River and its tributaries. Policy OC-7.1: Maintain river bed and banks for flood control, water delivery, and fish habitat. Implementation Measure 0C-7.1 (a): Working cooperatively on an ongoing basis with the affected property owners, the Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District (RRFC&WCID), Mendocino County, and other responsible and trustee agencies, develop and support programs to maintain the riverbed for flood control, fishery habitat, and water delivery. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors, Mendocino County Water Agency] Policy 0C-7. 2: Take measures to prevent further deepening of the channel. Implementation Measure OC-7. 2(a): Working cooperatively on an ongoing basis with affected property owners, the RRFC&WCID, Mendocino County, and other responsible and trustee agencies, establish a program to set a minimum riverbed elevation above mean sea level along its route within the Ukiah Valley and participate in project review to ensure that the channel elevation is maintained. [Timeframe for completion: Short-tern planning period 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agency/Departmentrespon- sible: Board of Supervisors, Mendocino County Water Agency] Policy OC-7. 3: Limit gravel harvesting to levels that do not exceed resupply of river gravel. Implementation Measure 0C-7.3(a): During the short-term planning period, work with the affected property owners, County of Mendocino, Department of Fish and Game, and California Division of Mines and Geology to determine the resupply levels of river gravel. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agency/Department responsible: ~C.r---;'~ cf SUp¢:'.'",:.C. rS Men.no COUnty Water Agency] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 6 Implementation Measure OC-Z 3(b): When reviewing permit applications for mineral resource harvesting from within the river channel, ensure that permit conditions maintain a maximum harvest volume that will not, when combined with other extraction permits, exceed the resupply levels for river gravel. [timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: County ~ Agency/Departrnentresponsible: Planning Department] Policy 0C-7. 4: Take measures to lessen flooding resulting from runoff. ~----,,,,-, ,-,~,-' ......... v,~,,-,," arca~. Implementation Measure 0C-7.4(a): The revised Land Development Code shall incorporate standards for retention or volume reduction of stormwater flows as a means of reducing flood potential from surface runoff from large paved areas. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/De- partment responsible: Public Works Departments and Planning Departments] Policy 0C-7.5: Maintain the Russian River as a natural riparian corridor. G Implementation Measure 0C-7.5(a): Incorporate design standards in the Land Development Code to integrate riparian habitat into project design as a means of avoiding potential impacts of river sedimentation and lessening the effects of erosion. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period ,e Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Departments] Implementation Measure OC-Z5(b): Review project landscaping proposals, working with proponents, to avoid removal or damage to riparian habitat and develop programs to avoid or manage sedimentation and erosion of river channels and tributaries. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Departments] Implementation Measure 0C-7.5(c): The Land Development Code shall include either specified setbacks from the Russian River based on precise criteria or site-specific performance standards for each zoning district. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning and Building Services] oal OC-8: Public or commercial recreational use shall be preferred to residential, general commercial, or industrial development on riverfront property. Policy 0C-8.1' Prohibit conversion of riverfront agricultural land to residential, general commercial, or industrial use. Implementation Measure OC-8. I(a): No lands within the one hundred year flood plain of the Russian River shall be convened from agricultural use to residential, general commercial, or industrial development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning] Implementation Measure 0C-8.1 (b): Establish land development programs that place an emph- asis on public or commercial recreation development of riverfront property, for lands convened from agricultural uses. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: County ~ Agency/Department responsible: Planning] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah tlJll Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 7 '1.03 Creeks and streams 1.03.01 Summary of major findings Creeks and streams provide spiritual, esthetic, and material sustenance to human and other resident species and must be preserved, or where necessary, restored as corridors of riparian vegetation and habitat within both the urban and rural areas. Creekside greenbelts can be used to contain and define city neighborhoods and enhance air quality. The creeks provide drainage channels for groundwater recharge, domestic and agricultural water supply, flood mitigation, fish and other aquatic life. Streams need to operate as natural waterways because the bottoms, edges and banks each serve a specific function. Stream banks and their riparian vegetation serve to filter runoff water as it enters the stream channel. Without these buffer zones, impurities can enter stream waters via storm runoff more directly. The strip of trees such as cottonwood, alder, willow and valley oak which commonly grow along the Russian River and its tributaries is referred to in scientific literature as a riparian woodland, forest or scrub. This riparian strip provides essential habitat for water-related birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles. The strip is an important "filtering zone" for runoff-water approaching the river, and the strip helps hold the river banks in place. As development is proposed within or near stream and creek corridors, site-specific considerations may result in a need to establish an area on a parcel on which construction is limited. The limitations would be to provide protection of riparian vegetation and streambanks. There are many methods of accommodating both the natural riparian habitat and site development requirements. More detailed site plan review within stream and creek corridors can result in attractive projects that serve both the needs of the property owner and provide a benefit to the community as a whole with an attractive stream or creek corridor. This objective can be accomplished in several different ways. In some communities, development codes may specify fixed setback distances from streams as mitigation. The ultimate direction of the Plan is to determine the need for setbacks and precise distances on a project-by-project basis. 1.03.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal OC-9: enhance ~els for creeks and waters flo~ through the Planning Area, Policy 0C-9.1: Establish a Stream and Creek Restoration Master Plan for each creek flowing through the City limits. Implementation Measure 0C-9.1 (a): In the short term planning period, the City shall establish a citizen's task force for the Stream and Creek Restoration Master Plan and provide staff and technical assistance. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-9.1 (b): The task force's final plan shall include recommendations for private and public funding sources and incentives n to property owners to nIncentives are to be addressed in the development code. Appropriate incentives include flexibility (continued...) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah · Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 8 accomplish stream or creek restoration. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Policy 0C-9.2: Develop maintenance programs, ecosystem analysis, and hydrological studies for stream channels for creeks and waters through the Planning Area. Implementation Measure 0C-9.2(a): When maintaining creek and stream channels, the City shall be cognizant of the natural conditions, restoring them whenever possible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~I, Measure applies to: City ~, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Public Works] Implementation Measure 0C-9.2(b): During the short-term planning period, wherever feasible and safe, remove barriers and impediments to fish passage following appropriate study of the channel. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Public Works] Implementation Measure 0C-9.2(c): The City shall maintain information available to the public about the use of riparian plants and vegetation for landscaping, including sources of plant material. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,~ Moa- sure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning] Implementation Measure 0C-9.2(d): Ensure that grading and development codes incorporate measures to protect and enhance fish habitat including riparian vegetation protection and restoration and erosion and sediment control measures. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Public Works, ~unty Department of Planning &BUilding] Implementation Measure 0C-9.2(e): Development plans shall be reviewed to ensure that proposals are coordinated with adjoining development in design to maintain or enhance contiguous riparian corridors. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Public Works, County Department of Planni0g& Building] Implementation Measure 0C-9.209: Support efforts of appropriate agencies to ensure instream water flows adequate to maintain and protect historic fisheries in the streams and creeks within the Planning Area. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Utilities, County Fish and Game Commission] Implementation Measure 0C-9. 2(g): Work with the California Department of Fish and Game and community groups to inventory spawning streams in the Planning Area and establish population counts for important fish species. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: County ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: County Fish and Game Commission] Implementation Measure 0C-9.2(h): During the intermediate and long-term planning period, the Redevelopment Authority shall allc, catc fa.-~da ~nsider among its projectslthe for restoration of creeks within its jurisdiction. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate and long-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Redevelopment Authority] 4(...continued) in setbacks, trade-offs for parking, and similar concepts. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah tl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 11 Implementation Measure OC-lO.I(a): During the short-term planning period, a "Habitat Conservation Plan" shall be developed in cooperation with the California Department of Fish and Game for the purpose of conserving valuable grounds in prime habitat areas. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy OC-IO. 2.'Roads and structures shall be designed and sited to conserve or avoid damage to the natural hillside resources where feasible. Implementation Measure OC-lO. 2(a): Utilize the Land Development Code to establish road and structure siting standards in the area's hills which conform to the Habitat Conservation Plan. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure ap- plies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments, County Depa~nt of Planning & Building] Implementation Measure OC-lO. 2(b): Site and design development to minimize impacts on views from the Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning, County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure OC-IO. 2(c): Clearings for roads, buildings, and fire protection zones shall be sited in the least visible and ecologically damaging locations possible and screened with vegetation where feasible, and ' ........ : ........"-- · ,. ......... ,, .......... ~ dnl~aging. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning, County Department of Planning and Building] Policy OC-lO. 3:Before build-out makes it infeasible within the Planning Area and City, identify appropriate areas for ...... ' trails along the ridge line that can be connected to trails in the valley. Implementation Measure OC-IO. 3(a): Prior to the conclusion of the short-term planning period, establish a citizen committee appointed by the City Council and Board of Supervisors to identify and select locations within the hills which would be appropriate sites for future public acquisition. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure OC-lO. 3(b): The City and County shall work to identify for ridge- line areas found to be suitable for general public use for possible acquisition. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-10.3(c): Provide points of connecting access from the ridge-top trails into the Valley in any plans or programs for trail development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Goal OC-11: Conserve coastal oak woodlands in the hills. Policy OC-11.1:Provide areas for development and areas for conservation in the hills. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ilJl, Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 12 Implementation Measure OC-11.1 (a): Utilize the Nararal Arca R,~c,u,w,~ Ma~ ex'ming natural resource inventory combined with the Habitat Conservation Plan as a basis for allocating areas for development and areas for conservation. [Timetrame for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-11.1 (b): Lands designated for conservation shall be developed with onsite density transfer provisions such as cluster housing. [Timeframe forcomple- tion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure OC-II.I (c): Utilize the provisions of the Land Development Code to allow density transfer within parcels that create cluster development to provide a balance between open space retention and the need to maintain a growing housing stock. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure OC-11.1 (d): Density transfer shall be utilized as part of a project's subdivision review through provisions in the revised Land Development Code. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period e, Measure applies to: City and County · , Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure OC-1I. 1 (e): Residential development density shall be allocated in relation to the availability of services and facilities to serve the property in the land use element. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy 0C-11.2: Development shall incorporate open space reserved for wildlife habitat and hiking. Implementation Measure OC-11.2(a): When new residential development is proposed in the castc.,-~ hills, provide incentives to encourage cluster development as a means of maintaining and enhancing natural areas and public hiking access. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/De- partment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 1.05.01 Summary of major findings *~.i:~~:*~".'"~::::~~:~5~~ 'I.05.01(A) Surface water runoff ~::.::..~!::~~ii~~~..i/i!li!iiiiili~i::!~:...:::: .... ::i!:::~::~..::!:i~i~:~ .... :::,:.:~,::,i: S ~i :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .':!::~'::::' .':~.':::::-.:~!~::::::iii!:::?":'::!:::~i~i~ii!i!i!~!~ urface water runoff is generated by ~. precipitation that annot be into the ground in the period following a storm. The surplus of water I~ili~~ moves downhill into drainage channels, forming creeks, II!gg ii i'..i l i[ ................. ............ streams, and ultimately entering the Russian River. The amount of surface mn-off is a factor generated by the precipitation in the storm, ground saturation, and the Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~li Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 13 available permeable ground surface. When land is developed, ground is compacted or covered with paving. These surfaces are called impermeable surfaces. "Permeability" is the measure of how quickly water can penetrate a surface area. When there is a limited amount of permeable area or high ground saturation, water runoff increases in both voltune and velocity. When an entire drainage system has its capacity exceeded, the water begins rising within the channel and overtops the banks. This is called "flooding." When impermeable surfaces are created, consideration must be given to the control and management of the surface waters generated by new development. In the past, the City managed surface nm-off by "engineering" and "channelizing" creeks passing through the Downtown area. Paved areas with overflow pond areas can be developed to simultaneously provide groundwater recharge, limit flooding, and protect creek habitat. This works by avoiding unnaturally rapid and large nmoff from urban areas. Lands that could be utilized as replacement habitat for the vernal pools and wet- lands may be available within public ownership or available for public acquisition or conservation easements. The use of replacement habitat as a conservation program has become popular in California during the early 1990s. The concept is that in exchange for the ability to develop or use a parcel that may be considered critical resource -- such as a wetland -- another location is selected in which a replacement habitat is created or restored. The California Department of Fish and Game, the Nature Conservancy, and other organizations have prepared standards and criteria that provide a consistent method for seeking replacement habitat and creating a new wetland or vernal pool. As more paved surfaces are developed within the Planning Area, the potential for contamination of surface water increases. With normal use, vehicles in parking lots may have leaks of oil, fuel, or coolant. This material accumulates on the surface of driveways and parking lots during dry weather. Although evaporation causes much of the liquid to aerate, the contaminants remain as a stain or on the surface of the paved area. During storms, the contaminants may be carried from the parking lot into the stormwater. The contaminated water combines with other surface water and drains into streams, creeks, and ultimately the Russian River. The contamination can be reduced through the use of various construction techniques. One common technique is to utilize a trap called a "dry-well." Surface water from a parking area drains into the well before exiting the property. Because petroleum-based contaminants float on water, a gravity system is used to separate oils and fuels from the water before it enters the drainage system. Another surface water quality issue centers on containing the storm surge. The City and County drainage systems can only accommodate a certain volume of water at one time. As construction of impervious surfaces increases, the volume and velocity of water draining in response to storms increases, thereby increasing the storm surge and likelihood of flooding. Risks can be reduced by designing drainage controls which retain major storm waters on-site until peak flows have passed. For many years, the pear orchards and vineyards along the river have served as the de facto detention basis and floodwater storage area for the City's and County's urbanized land uses. Neither agency has appropriately planned or managed stormwater runoff, because the agricultural uses along the river have always been a convenient flood control measure. As the Ukiah Valley continues to grow, it becomes more important for the City and County to manage stormwater run-off and retention so that the agri-industries suffer less from flooding impacts increased by urbanization. Constructed ponds, dry wells, retention basins, and sediment traps are just a few of the techniques that can be used to delay the discharge of stormwater during major storms. In addition to increasing the load on the drainage system, stormwater runoff also can carry sediment and debris that clog and reduce Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah dill Mendocino County, Califomia IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation e Page 14 drainage system capacity. This may result in flooding on tributaries, overflow at culverts and storm sewers, or overflows and discharges into the Russian River from the sewage disposal facility. 1.05.01(B) Points of potential contamination There are two terms that apply to water pollution -- point and non-point sources of pollution. Point sources are those that can be "pinpointed" to a specific location. Non-point sources of pollution originate over broad areas from which no single place of beginning can be identified. Between 1991 and 1993, the California legislature updated many of the State's laws related to clean water. The regulations cover many methods of management, remediation, and enforcement. Some of the regulations assign responsibility to County Health Departments, however, most are assigned to the California Water Quality Control Board. In 1992 and 1993, the Congress updated and renewed the Federal Clean Water Act. Most management, responsibility, and enforcement has been assigned to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Federal regulations address similar standards as California regulations. States are permitted to enact laws with more stringent standards than those applied by the Federal government but not standards which are less stringent. All public and private development in the Ukiah Valley will need to ensure protection of water sources -- the Russian River, its tributaries, and the groundwater system. For many years, treated and untreated water from municipal sewage disposal systems were discharged into water systems. Urban sewer plants were among the earliest targets for clean water actions and improvements. Sewage disposal methods are constantly improving, and reclaimed water can enhance conservation efforts by providing an alternative water source for certain uses, such as landscaping. Additionally, it may be possible to achieve an a~sthetic enhancement of treamaent ponds. The emphasis for preventing surface water contamination is being placed on the individual. rcapc, nalbility. When surface water and stormwater runoff is controlled, the cl,angc$ Yolnme of contamination entering the Russian River system is reduced. Onsite management allows the City and County to cut down on the costs of containment through construction of less complex systems. Stormwater controls to cut down on contamination is a City-wide system that is needed. The City of Ukiah owns a landfill located on Vichy Springs Road east of the Russian River. The landfill is part of the overall waste management system for Mendocino County. At the present time, there have been concerns about the potential for groundwater contamination from the landfill. Landfills must be designed to contain any water that touches the fill area. Surface water is contained through collection ponds designed to trap any excess flow of water so that it cannot leave the landfill site. ..... u --"-t ................................. CRC)' ~, .................. j ......... t-' ......... /. must be r solwxl part Of process i Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I.' Open 'Space and Conservation 4, Page 15 1.05.01(C) Water supply and demand Water supply is not constant in the Ukiah Valley. The amount of water available for use varies with precipitation, dr~,ugh:, and intensity of water use. The right to use the available water is divided into three broad categories. Approximately forty percent of the more than 20,000 acre feet of water rights in the basin is controlled by "Pre-49' Water Rights, considered to be the preeminent water right. Another forty Table IV. 1-1: Waterstorage capacity, Russian Riversystem percent is held in various distribu- tion rights that date after 1949. The remaining twenty percent represent other uses and diversions. At pres- ent, during "normal" rainfall years, about 12,000 acre feet are used dur- ing the year. During a drought year, some of the "Post '49" water rights are suspended. In order for those who held the "younger" rights, the unused portions of the "Pre-'49" water rights are used to offset the drought-reduced volume of water. 1.05.01(D) Regional water data The Ukiah Valley groundwater basin is the northernmost basin in the Russian River water system. The groundwater basin is about twenty-two miles long and averages three miles in width. It underlies an area of over sixty square miles. The groundwater basin was created geologically in a depression formed by faulting. Geologically, the sediments of continental deposits and recent alluvium layers are the strata in which water is contained. This is evident as the gravel in the Russian River. The depth of the gravel impacts the volume of water in the channel. These strata are located on top of the non-waterbearing consolidated rocks. The thickness may range from eight feet in the alluvium to potentially two thousand feet within the deposits. With the building of Coyote Dam, the flow of gravel was interrupted from the East Fork of the Russian River. Consequently, the depth of the gravel zone has been reduced as the river bed depth has decreased. Table IV. 1-1 provides information from the Department of Water Resources about the Ukiah-area aquifer? Figure IV. 1-E shows the distribution of Valley water rights. 40.3% 39.8% 19.9% [] Pre-1949 Rights I Di.trlbution Rights I Other Uae/Diversion Figure IV. l-E: Sources of water rights 6April 6, 1993 California Water Resources Agency--Department of Water Resources, Water Resources and Future Water Reouirements. North Coastal Hydrographic Unit, Volume I: Southern Portion (Sacramento: State of California, 1985), Bulletin 142-1, pp. 318-322. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 16 City of Ukiah ~ll Mendocino County, Califomi~ 1.05.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal OC-12: Protect groundwater recharge. Policy OC-12.1:Establish a program to maintain quality ~ quantity of groundwater in the recharge area. Implementation Measure 0¢-12. I (a): If it is determined that a development proposal may result in a significant reduction in groundwater recharge areas or water quantity, the developer shall be required to analyze the areas of new impermeable surfaces to provide information as to whether the potential impact is significant. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,e, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal OC-13: Protect the Valley's groundwater system. Policy 0C-13.1: Maintaining long-term sustained yield of the Valley's groundwater system shall be the standard for evaluation for groundwater protection programs. Implementation Measure OC-13.1(a): During the intermediate term planning period, assemble available baseline information describing the Valley's groundwater system -- physical and natural characteristics, quality and quantity, and demand and resupply. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period ~, Measure ap- plies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and '"-' .......... ' ~' " ' -' P~ar;.r;.in,3 ---' ~'--"'-':--'Mendocino County Water Agency] comprehensive evaluation of potential impacts and standardize mitigation measures and project conditions related to groundwater protection. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediateplanning period ,~ Measure applies to: City and County ,~ Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Department of Planning and Building and MendoCino icounty Water Agency] Implementation Measure 0C-13.1 (c): When development proposals are received, ensure that there is adequate information from the baseline study, and the standardized impact analysis and mitigation program to determine whether the proposed project will result in a significant change in the Ukiah Valley aquifer. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing (following completion of the groundwater studies) planning period ~, Measure ap- plies to: City and County ~ Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] GoalOC-14: Strive to keep local water resources for local use and avoid water export. Policy 0C-14./:Support actions to retain water in the Ukiah Valley. Implementation Measure 0C-14.1(a): Participate with other area agencies in hearings and petitions before state or federal agencies to oppose transfer of water rights or Ukiah Valley-source water from within the Ukiah Valley to other areas. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~t, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: Mendocino County Water Agency] Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah JlJli, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and Conservation 4, ?age ]7 Policy OC-I5./:Protect water quality from adverse impacts of urban and agricultural runoff. Goal Implementation Measure 0C-15.1 (a): Adopt grading regulations for purposes of reducing erosion and sedimentation. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Public Works and County Building and Planning] Implementation Measure OC-I5.1 (b)' Support public and private land management programs which aim to reduce erosion and agricultural run-off, [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Council and County Board of Supervisors] OC-16: Design parking facilities -'--: .... -'- · ,~,.Sl. -~,~ to reduce runoff and surface water contamination. Policy 0C-16./:Protect surface water supplies from water generated in parking lots. Implementation Measure OC-16.1(a): Parking lot design shall be reviewed by .,.A,~,,. ,~l,yo:'- to ensure that there are adequate containment features to separate contaminated surface water from storm water run-off. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure OC-I6.1(b): Utilize appropriate technology to delay storm surges from running off parking areas and potentially overburdening the drainage system. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Public Works Departments] Policy OC-16.2:Manage stormwater flows to reduce the hazard of flooding from increased stormwater volumes. Implementation Measure 0C-16.2(a): Review all proposed projects to ensure that the calculated volume and locations of surface water discharges do not exceed the capacity of area drainage systems. If the drainage system is exceeded, improvements can be required through Appendix 70 of the Uniform Building Code. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure 0C-16. 2 (b): During the intermediate-term planning period, develop a stormwater management program for urbanized areas in the Valley to prevent Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, CalifornP, IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 18 damage to agricultural areas from --: ..... C~nveyance of its flood ,.,,~, ........ o waters. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Public Works] 1.06 Agriculture 1.06.01 Summary of major findings Agriculture is a basic industry in the Ukiah Valley. Agriculture actually defines the Valley and its overall character and quality of appearance. It makes a valuable contribution to the local economy and to the quality of life. The encroachment of incompatible uses into agricultural areas must be prevented. Although the California Land Conservation Act (Williamson Act)7 (Agricultural Preserves) promotes conservation of agricultural lands, a higher priority must be placed on maintaining the economic health of the agricultural industry in the Ukiah Valley. Ensuring the economic viability of agriculture is the most effective method of conserving agricultural lands. Agricultural land is much more than "open space land." Agricultural land has its own specific needs in order to remain such. A responsible "open space" policy must recognize agricultural land as an active land use and all the needs of agriculture as an operating business. Widespread public interest exists in preserving agricultural uses as economic, visual and environmental resources. Protective programs with public and private financing or facilitation, including land trusts, open-space easements, and transfer of development rights could assist in conserving this valuable resource. 7"Agriculture Preserves" are contracts between the landowner and the County for special tax incentives to retain land for productive agriculture use in ten year periods. The contract renews automatically each year, so that it is a rolling ten year contract. In order to be released from the Agriculture Preserve requirements, a "notice of non-renewal" must be filed. The land then comes out of the preserve at the termination of the ten year period. The provisions for this method of preservation of agricultural land is contained within a state law called the "Williamson Act." Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and Conservation ~' Page ]9 Due to the combination of soils and climate, California agricultural lands are often noted as a natural resource of worldwide significance. In the Ukiah Valley, in addition to the prime soils on the valley floor, many of the bench lands are highly productive for grapes. Residents of the valley hold a position of trust and stewardship for the remaining agriculturally suitable areas within the valley. Absent drastic changes in circumstances, the large, contiguous areas presently zoned for agriculture will not be removed from agricultural use. This includes portions of the area west of Highway 101 north of Ackerman Creek and on the east side of the freeway into the Ukiah Valley. Other productive agricultural parcels should not be converted to urban uses while developable land remains that is unsuited for agriculture. Economic stability and sustainability in any industry is fostered by diversification and experimentation. Mendocino County has one of the largest concentrations in the state of organic farmers. As the Ukiah Valley continues to grow, there will be an increased need for lands to urbanize. Agricultural lands are scattered throughout the Valley. Much of the "prime" agriculture lands are not classified as Agriculture Preserves with Williamson Act contracts. The interest in agricultural preserves waned following enactment of Proposition 13, because property taxes were substantially reduced.8 Some of the lands within the Ukiah Valley designated for agricultural use are too small for viable commercial agriculture. These parcels are scattered throughout the Planning Area. In addition to conserving prime agriculture lands in order to maintain a basic industry in the Ukiah Valley, policies to conserve agricultural lands are an important method of maintaining a rural appearing community and providing a rural quality of life. Policies for these latter two purposes should be subject to exceptions for land use conversions necessary to accommodate future populations and to accommodate existing scattered parcels too small for viable commercial agriculture.9 Long-term, programs to provide protection for existing commercial agriculture from encroaching residential development is important. The use of "right-to-farm" regulations -- combined with the required CEQA assessment of the impact of proposed development on adjoining agriculture uses -- are among the methods that can be used as a means of protecting existing agriculture from incompatible uses. SMendocino County General Plan, page 1-10. 9"Commercial agriculture" means an agricultural enterprise that generates enough net income annually to cover the proprietor's living expenses and the operation's equipment repair and replacement (Source: Steven Taylor, Pacific Coast Farm Credit). Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califoml= IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 20 1.06.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal 0C-17: Recognize agriculture as a basic industry in the Ukiah Valley. Policy OC-1 7. I:The encroachment of incompatible uses into agricultural areas shall be avoided. Implementation Measure OC-I 7. I (a): Land use designations shall avoid conflicts between agricultural uses and adjoining land uses. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy OC-1 7.2:Utilize the Williamson Act as one means to promote conservation of agricultural lands. Implementation Measure OC-17.2(a): Encourage the use and renewal of Williamson Act con- tracts for agriculture lands in the Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure OC-1Z2(b): Encourage the County to approve requests for qualifying lands to enter into Williamson Act contracts. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agency/Deparbnentresponsible: Board of Supervisors] Policy OC-17.3:Enact a right-to-farm ordinance consistent with the County's right-to-farm ordinance. Implementation Measure 0C-17.3(a): Within six months of initial General Plan adoption, enact the County Right-to-Farm ordinance or a more stringent right-to-farm ordinance. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Planning Department] Goal OC-18: In concert with the County, preserve the economic viability of agriculture lands. Policy 0C-18./:Investigate protective programs to conserve agriculture lands. Implementation Measure 0C-18. I (a): Utilizing methods such as public and private purchase of development rights, or other tradeoffs, including land trusts, open-space ease- ments or transfer of development rights, work with the County to implement a program during the short-term planning period designed to remove or reduce development pressures on agricultural lands. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal OC-19: Maintain existing agricultural areas. Policy OC-19.1:The large, contiguous areas presently classified for agriculture are to remain classified as agricultural land. Implementation Measure 0C-19. I (a): Work with the County to provide for zoning that will permit establishment of small-sized, specialized, intensive farming operations or necessary accessory uses. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Mea- Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 2] sure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-19.1 (b): Require parcel sizes created by new subdivisions~° to be sufficient in size to be compatible with adjoining agriculture areas. [Timefreme for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-19.1 (c): A land use classification and overlying zoning district may be changed from an agricultural classification to a non-agricultural classifica- tion only when all of the following have been substantiated: · The application includes either a proposed Specific Plan meeting the requirements of California law, or meets the requirements for a Master Plan Area and land development regulations; · Included in the application is a letter from the source of funding for the project that the funds have been committed and approved for the pro- posed development. This document may be considered confidential and not a part of the public record, however, lead agency officials shall be required to attest to its authenticity; · The development plan shows how infrastructure shall be provided. The project may Shall not result in a need for premature expansion of '"":'=': ....... :";'- infrastructure; · Along with the application, proof must be provided that no other locations within the Planning Area could meet the project's objectives; · The General Plan amendment must achieve the long-range goals of the General Plan as it exists prior to amendment; · The application may Shall not have a significant adverse effect on adjoining agricultural uses; · ~e sUbject landis substantially unuseable for agricultural purposes due to encroaching adjacent nonagricultural uses. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Departmentre- sponsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal OC-20: Allow agriculturally-compatible uses on non-viable agriculture lands, Policy 0C-20./:Ensure that deVelopment parcels on which commercially-viable agriculture is not feasibl ~ .... " ..... "'-" .... ' .... '~-" ..... compatible with agricultu al Implementation Measure 0C-20.1 (a): Permit residential land use on agricultural lands at parcel sizes compatible with commercial agricultural uses on lots that are not feasible for commercial-scale agricultural use. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure OC-20.1(b): Utilize provisions of the Land Development Code to ensure that there is a suitable separation between commercial agriculture uses and non-compatible uses such as residential. The responsibility for providing the ~°For purposes of the General Plan, subdivision means the division of any land into two or more saleable or buildable parcels. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah · Mendocino County, Californi,~ IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 22 separation shall be borne by the non-agricultural use. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period e Measure applies to: Gity and Gounty ,t, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-20.1(c): Ensure that the "right-to-farm" ordinance or Land Development Code includes appropriate performance standards for agricultural- residential separation on agricultural lands. [~metrame torcomplotion: Ongoing plann- ing period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] GoalOC-21: Support diversified farming for local benefits and food supply. Policy 0C-21.1.Organic farming shall be encouraged as an economic and knowledge resource, as well as to promote self-sufficiency of local food supply. Implementation Measure OC-2I. 1 (a): Lend support on an ongoing basis to programs which encourage organic and sustainable farming. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department~.,---',.. "'.....~,, ...... ,,~ Dcpr_.,-t~, ,~nt ..,-' P~a r, r,~ r,..3 ~.,---',.. ~.~.°' ';"~=-,, .,,, ,~, ~ Department of AgricultUre and Fa~ AdViSOr] 1.07 1.07.01 Native plants and animals Summary of major findings V alley oaks are a species of special cohcern to the California Department of Forestry and the California Department of Fish and Game. These trees are common within the climate and habitat of the Ukiah Valley. ~eCity~en, joyedgenerafionsof~auty;::~nprotection,;~ summer cooling from its ever-maturing ~s, The he~th and abili~ ~ grow a~ reprodu~ must ~ protected as more development occurs inthe Ci To the extent S~le ~e "'new-'SUbUrb look w : ~ :: hich can occur When mature treeS are removed emirely and replaced With Young nurse, stockShO~d ~ avoided' As part of a diverse local ecology, there is a need to encourage desired birds and wildlife by landscape design and plantings. The local environment and habitat can be managed, for example, to encourage the population of bats for insect and mosquito control. An emphasis on native or indigenous species in landscaping, especially in public projects and for street trees, can enhance the area's ecosystems. Plant vegetation in interrelated communities can be used to enhance wildlife use. At the same time, consid- eration needs to be given to discourage undesirable species by using vegetation that is unattractive to such species or present nonconducive habitat. Native plant landscaping is an important option available for new development. New growth needs to mature into vegetation matching the City's existing landscape. Much of the Ukiah area is attractively shaded by a variety of stately trees of various maturities including oaks, elms, fruit trees, sycamores, cedars and evergreens. ,~,,,. '":"- '- .... : .... -' ...... : .... c ,. ............... : .. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ll Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and ConservatiOn 4, Page 23 There are three categories of City or developed-area trees for which interest in protection has been expressed through the visioning process of the General Plan.~ The first category deals with "street trees." These are the trees that are located between the edge of pavement and beginning of private property. Trees are defined as street trees because of proximity to streets and roads, although in some situations, the tree may be located on private property that extends to the edge of pavement or the centerline of the street. The second category involves "park trees." These trees are located on public property in the various City- or County-owned parks throughout the Planning Area. Trees located on other publicly-owned lands, such as school playgrounds or Mendocino College, are also classified as "park trees." The third category covers mature or "stately trees", located entirely on private property, such as the proverbial "old oak tree" in the back yard. The vision of the General Plan focuses on conserving or enhancing these trees as part of project design rather than an unmitigated removal for convenient construction. l~Trees used for agricultural production, such as the Valley's pear trees, are expressly exempt from this discussion. This discussion also is not addressing the oak woodlands discussed in Section IV.A.4 on page 11. ~2prepared for the General Plan by Stephanie Hoppe, July 8, 1993. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, ?age 24 City of Ukiah/1~ Mendocino County, Californi= 1.07.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal 0C-22: Conserve and replenish valley oaks in the Valley. Policy OC-22.1:Maintain, protect, and replant stands of Valley Oaks. Implementation Measure 0C-22.1(a): When reviewing proposals for development, require that all valley oaks on the project area be identified, and ensure that all reasonable Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 25 Goal OC-23: efforts have been undertaken to protect the trees. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Native plant landscaping shall be encouraged. Policy 0C-23./.'Define standards that include native plant landscaping. Implementation Measure 0C-23.1 (a): Provide information about native plant landscaping to developers. Implementation Measure 0C-23.1(b): Develop landscaping standards which use native plant landscaping for all new development and redevelopment projects. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-23.1(c): Landscaping standards for new development and redevelopment projects shall be applicable to all but individual single-family residential development. 23 Compliance with landscaping standards shall be required as a condition of discretionary approvals or a condition of issuing a building permit. This implementation measure does apply to single family residences located within planned developments or subdivisions for which landscaping standards were incorporated as conditions of project approval. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure 'applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal OC-24: Replace aging trees with new trees. Policy 0C-24.1 :Develop a program to ensure continued healthy tree propagation. Implementation Measure 0C-24.1(a): Continue the program c,f a~l~JL~.,OL~ZLa~Jaa ~L ~lO~laa~ ~lLy pazks to replace aging trees giving preference to native species. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Parks and Recreation] Goal 0C-25: Maintain and enhance the City's canopy of shade trees. Policy 0C-25.1 :Protect existing healthy mature trees to maintain shade and area attractiveness. Implementation Measure 0C-25.1 (a): During the short-term planning period, utilize the Land Development Code or enact an ordinance identifying important shade tree areas and providing for their long-term management and health. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ar,~ Ccunty ~I, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Planning Department ---' '"-' '-"' "' ........ -' P',ann",r;,,,,,5 --'~ '~' ':"~:-' ~ I~IIITM VVTMIIL~ UI~JUILIII~i~IIL VI tg~ll~i IMUII~4III~:~J 13Applicability of design and landscaping standards are defined in the Community Design Element, Chapter VI.2 of the General Plan. Generally, individual single family homes on individual parcels -- unless part of a planned unit development, Master Plan Area, or Specific Plan -- are exempt from design and landscaping standards identified in the Plan. If a home is part of a planned unit development, Master Plan Area, Specific Plan, or if it was part of a subdivision with landscaping conditions, then individual homes may be subject to design review. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Iv.i. Open Space and Conservation ~, ?a8¢ :26 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomt~ Implementation Measure 0C-25.1 (b): Establish a requirement for public notice and hearing when trees are to be removed from undeveloped public, private, and redeveloped property -- except for recreational purposes or in relation to agriculture -- as part of the design review program. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~ Agency/Department responsible: Redevelopment Agency] Goal OC-26: Restore river fisheries. Policy 0C-26./:Prohibit fishing access to spawning riffles and fishing of newly released fish. Implementation Measure 0C-26.1 (a): Establish restricted or no access points to areas where fish are known to spawn. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Mea- sure applies to: City and County ~1, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning part -- Cc ,'y "' ......... ' ~',a ';;,~ --'~ "'""'~=- and Fish and Game De ment,,,,,.,-' '..'r, ,-,,-F,,,,, ......... r,r,; ~,, ,~., ,.,~.,,,~,,, ,~ ~ Commission] G oal OC-27: Limit public access where necessary to protect important fish habitat. Policy OC-2Zl:Establish preserves for typical or endangered fish species and habitats. Implementation Measure 0C-27.1 (a): During the intermediate-term planning period, identify areas for acquisition or dedication as easements for purposes of wildlife preserves. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and ~ ......... ' ' County F"rSh and Game Commission] '-"..F' ............ ,n~,;-;,r,;7,,~ ---, '~-.:'4:.,- r~l i i'~.~ - I.,.~ 1,~ i i ~.~ i i i ~ 1.08 Scenic corridors 1.08.01 Summary of major findings First impressions of the Valley are important to Valley residents and in attracting visitors. One of the leading contributors to a positive first impression is an attractive series of highway corridors entering and leaving the Valley. Scenic corridors need to be identified and their attractiveness enhanced or preserved. Within the Valley, there are local streets and roads that provide a respite from developing urban views. The roads serve as attractive corridors for residents traveling from home to work or business districts. Local scenic streets and highways are also in need of assurances that the views will remain attractive. Highway 101 through the Ukiah Valley is a local General Plan Scenic Corridor which provides visitors and residents access to the beauty of this valley. It would enhance the environment of the Ukiah Valley if the appearance of the Highway 101 corridor were improved. The Chamber of Commerce developed a beautification program along Highway 101 in 1990, resulting in the planting of trees in an area between Burke Hill Drive and Lake Mendocino Drive. The system is irrigated by an experimental solar-operated drip irrigation system. The trees and other plantings have added to the beautification of the Highway 101 corridor. 1.08.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 27 Goal OC-28: Visually enhance the Highway 10l corridor through the Area. Planning Policy OC-28.1:Upgrade the visual appearance of the corridor along Highway 101. Implementation Measure 0C-28.1 (a): Utilize the Land Development Code to require new construction, permits for remodeling, and replacement of landscaping to meet current landscaping standards to ensure an upgraded appearance through the Ukiah Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-28.1 (b): During the short-term planning period, enhance the appearance of the Highway 101 corridor and Caltrans right-of-way with additions to the recently planted tree and flower plantings. The emphasis shall be to favor native species. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department '" ....... D~pa.-tmcr;.t -' P'.&r;.nlng ---' '"..:'":- ~ 1.09 Urban open space 1.09.01 Summary of major findings OPen space within the City, includil'~g fc, rc~tcd arca~, is very limited. U~ open ~a~ needs to b ' ' ~ ....... " ............... -' '--.---'-~ ? ,,..--'~-~-,,.,~ e defined within the PI~ ~ "~ "'" °~'"': ""~° '~'"' "'"'o"-~"-" -"-"~ ", -,~ '---v o -,,--~,,,,-,,.,,,,,,~. The established residential neighborhoods -- particularly the West Side with its mix of residents and housing types and its extensive mature trees and landscaping -- give the city its character as a pleasant place to live. '~': ....... · .... ~..,~ ..... ,.,, P|anr.';ng Area. Increasing pressure to remove stately trees and preempt yard areas for larger houses and additions should be offset by in lieu fees or off-site substitution of landscaped areas or public gardens in neighborhood park districts, lot coverage limits, and other measures. Community gardens, which are touched on in this section, are addressed in detail with supporting policy programs in the Parks and Recreation Element in Chapter V.2 of the General Plan. 1.09.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs GoalOC-29: Maintain and enhance the "urban forests" which create a sense of urban space. Policy 0C-29.1: The development review process shall incorporate measures to maintain and enhance the urban tree canopy. Implementation Measure 0C-29.1(a): The Land Development Code shall incorporate measures to maintain and enhance the urban tree canopy. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Planning Department ] Implementation Measure 0C-29. I (b): Review construction and landscaping site plans to ensure that healthy trees are not removed unnecessarily. [Timeframe for completion: ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City planning Department and County Planning and Building Services Department] Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 28 Policy OC-29.2.Cultivate an understanding of and appreciation for the social, environment, and aesthetic values of trees. Implementation Measure 0C-29.2(a): Make available information on sound urban forest management practices. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Planning Department ] Goal OC-30: Showcase the Civic Center area as an urban park and gathering place. Policy 0C-30./.Connect the Civic Center to the Courthouse through landscaping. Implementation Measure OC-30.1(a): During the short-term planning period, redesign the Civic Center grounds/Seminary Avenue corridor as an urban park gathering place. Landscape the corridor that connects downtown to the Courthouse area via School Street. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Parks and Recreation] ementation Measure 0C-30.1 : ....... ,, -.,, large ..... ~ ............ / on Maintain Seminary Avenue as a tree-lined boulevard. -'- ..... ~- .... . ..... t ...... ,,~ ~.,,,,~,, rcgular ....and --~: A~, ,t. ...... . [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Parks and Recreation] Policy 0C-30. 2.'Utilize undeveloped City-owned parcels as community gardens. Implementation Measure 0C-30.2(a): Parcels of land that are owned by the City but undevel- oped, shall be made available to interested groups as community gardens as feasible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy/Departrnent responsible: General Services Department] Implementation Measure 0C-30.2(b): During the short-term planning period, promote the location of potential community garden sites. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: C~ 4, Agency/Department responsible: Parks and Recreation] Air quality 1.10.01 Introduction and setting The Valley located in south-central Mendocino county, about 25 miles inland from the Ukiah is Pacific Ocean. The Valley lies at about 39 degrees north latitude and 123 west longitude. With an average elevation of about 630 feet, the Valley has surrounding hills ranging up to about 3000 feet. The Valley runs north-south for about 9 miles, with a maximum width of about 3 miles. The Russian River enters the Valley at the north end, and runs south along the Valley floor. Soils are composed of fertile alluvium, and many pear and grape orchards flourish along the east side of the River. Residential and commercial land uses predominate on the west side of the river. The railroad right-of-way and Highway 101 also parallel the river through the Valley. The roughly 28,000 people inhabiting the Ukiah Valley own about 23,500 on-road motor vehicles, which represent the largest source of air pollution. Mendocino County's climate is considered Mediterranean, with warm, dry summers and cooler wet winters. Along the coast, mild temperatures predominate, moderated by the influence of the Pacific Ocean. This maritime effect diminishes inland by physical distance and intervening mountain ranges. Consequently, inland valleys experience a much wider range of temperatures. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah dlJl, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program iV.I. Open Space and Conservation 4, ?age 29 1.10.02 Summary of major findings 1.10. 02(A) Meteorology A persistent high pressure area off the Humboldt coast, called the East Pacific High, dominates weather over most of California. Seasonal variations in the strength and position of the high pressure cell cause changes in the weather patterns of the Ukiah Valley. The East Pacific High generally remains fixed several hundred miles off the coast from May through September, diverting storms and creating a dry summer climate. In late fall, the high pressure cell dissipates and winter storms can sweep in from the Gulf of Alaska. Warm, dry summers and cool, wet winters typify Ukiah Valley weather. Summer high temperatures average in the 90's, while very warm days can exceed 105 degrees. Summer low temperatures often range between 50 and 60 degrees. Winter high temperatures generally range in the 50's and 60's, and can fall to 12 degrees at night. The average annual temperature is 58 degrees, and the frost-free period is about 220 days annually. Rain falls primarily during the winter months, with a long-term annual average of about 35 inches. Monthly rainfall can reach 8 inches in winter months. Winds disperse air pollution emissions away from their sources, reducing concentration by diluting with cleaner air. Pollution dispersion can occur vertically as well as horizontally. Under "ideal" dispersion conditions, pollution moves away from its source in all directions, unimpeded by physical barriers, rapidly diluting and dissipating so that no health hazard remains. Conversely, still air often allows pollution levels to build up near where emission occur. Frequently in the Ukiah Valley, a phenomenon known as a "temperature inversion" occurs. During inversion conditions, a layer of warm air covers a cooler layer near the ground, trapping air and restricting vertical mixing. The base of these inversions usually occurs at 1500 feet or lower, well below the tops of surrounding hills. Data from the California Air Resources Board (ARB) shows that an inversion is present 98 % of mornings, and it is ground-based 85 % of the timeTM. The result is that pollutants emitted in the Ukiah Valley are effectively trapped, and cannot disperse vertically or laterally. Compounding this trapping effect, calm (near zero mph) surface winds occur about 50% of the time. Two processes form surface-based inversions in the Ukiah Valley. During summer, warmer inland temperatures tend to create a low pressure zone, which pulls cooler marine air inland. This intrusion of cool marine air into the Valley near the ground lifts warmer air, creating an inversion on most summer days. Inversions also form nocturnally as air cooling on surrounding hills flows down canyons, pooling on the Valley floor. ~4personal communication with David Faulkner, Executive Director of the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District (MCAQMD), July 29, 1994. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah dl~ Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 30 Prevailing strong summer winds come from the north-west. However, winds can come from the south and east under several short-lived conditions. First, when a storm front approaches Northern California from the north-west, winds near the surface blow toward the storm front (an area of low pressure). These southerly winds usually last no more than a day, and as soon as the storm passes, winds again are still or blow from the north-west. Very hot weather in the upper Sacramento Valley can also cause cooler marine air to flow up the Russian River, causing weak to moderate south winds along the Valley floor. In early autumn, strong, dry offshore winds may occur for several days in a row. These winds, called "Santa Anas' in southern California, are usually caused by a large mass of cold air aloft subsiding over southern Utah and northern Arizona. As this air mass sinks, it compresses the air below it, causing heating and surface air movement toward the Pacific coast. During either of these regimes, air pollution created in the Sacramento Valley, Santa Rosa Plain, or even San Francisco Bay area may move into the Ukiah Valley. is During winter, strong local inversions form as cold air sinks from surrounding hills. This happens on most nights in stable weather between storms. During these periods, pollution build-up from automobiles and stationary sources is often compounded by significant quantities of PM l0 (smoke) from open burning and wood burning appliances. The Ukiah Valley's strong, persistent winter inversions, coupled with little wind (between storm periods) allows pollution to build for a period of days, with each day's new emissions added to the residual from the day before.. ^.,* ~......~' ,;......~.. ..... ic,.,:c..~ ..."c a..._...........~*"*" PM~ oL~Zl lva~al v~a ~,~l l l tJVb,%~l.~l . 1. I0.02(B) Air Quafity Management me Mendocino Air QUality Management District is gOVe~.by the Mendocino County iBoard of Supervisors. The District issues permits for stationary sources to emit specified quantities of pollution, construction of new emission sources, and open burning. District enforcement staff conduct compliance inspections of stationary sources, respond to odor and nuisance complaints, and enforce open burning regulations. The District also receives repons of toxic emissions from stationary sources, enforces applicable regulations on these emissions, and conducts continuous ambient air monitoring in Ukiah, Willits and Fort Bragg. z,cfl.,az FzGzuzzaz~ a~,~zs~z~.,o ~.v ~v~z~,l., zctsz~a ~o,., aziza t.,~,zLus~ Fzv~Lazzz~ ~,~zs~.ds~.,sas L,o au t.luazzt.,y. Las Lasso ~;---~.3: ~.~ ~--:~:~--~ .......... ,.I .3~ __:.:_..: .... ,.1 ~1.~--~:..~.~ l~Personal communication with Phil Towle, MCAQMD, and Wilson Goddard PhD, Consulting Engineer, July 29, 1994. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 31 Under its CEQA authoritY ~ a commenting Agency, the~:D~Ct reViews proposed large develOPment projects for p°tential ~ quality ~actsi~i~e ~istfi~ evaluates m°tot ~vehicle ~rn~Sions USing principles followed by ~the state ~ other air districts~ applying lOC~ fleet ~ssiOn factorS..!:.~e District ~ reviews ambient ~llUtiOn levels in determining ifa project might cause standard Violations Or other ~eal~l conditions l ~e: DiStriCt ~ also de velt~p~ ~ set of Standard recommendatiOns for preparers Of .Environmental Impact ~Repom~ The Mendocino County Air Quality Management District is pan of the North Coast Air Basin, which includes Del None, Humboldt, Trinity, Mendocino counties and part of northern Sonoma county. The first three counties named are in the North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District, Mendocino County is a separate air district, and Northern Sonoma is a separate air district. Districts of the North Coast Air Basin cooperate to develop rules and regulations, and to share engineering, monitoring and other resources. 1.10.02(C) Air Quality Standards Ambient Air Quality standards consist of three elements: a compound (example, carbon monoxide), a concentration (example, 9.0 pans per million), and an averaging time (example, 8 hours). Hence, the allowable level of carbon monoxide is 9.0 parts per million measured over eight hours. Both the state and federal governments have set ambient air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, PM10 (paniculate matter 10 microns or smaller), and lead. Additional pollutants present a problem in some areas (e.g., near sources of sulfur compound emissions), and the state has set standards for sulfates and hydrogen sulfides. There is also a California ambient air quality standard for visibility reducing paniculate matter. The table below shows standards which air districts must maintain: Table IV. 1-2: National and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (1994) Ozone 1 hour ppm 0.09 0.12 Dioxide I hour ppm 0.25 - - II · :.-.:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:.....:..---:.--. 4.: -:.. :. :.: :.:. ::::: ::: :::::: :::::~:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::: ::: :.:::.: :.:.: ::: :: 4 ~ :::: :::::: ::::: ::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'-:::: :::: :::::.:::::: :::::i: :i:i:i:i:i:!:!:~:~:: 'i.'i:i::"!:!:!:":::::" ":':::: :.': ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.'i:: %' .' .$': -'~.'i-%'i.'i:i:i:~.'!:~:!'[.'i:i Annual ~.g/2 /~g/m3 30.00 50.00 PM10 4 hours /zg/m3 50.00 150.00 - ~6/Letter from David Faulkner, MCAQMD, dated December 29, 1994. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ilJli Mendocino County, Californ?' IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 32 tOzone I hour ppm 0.09,.. ~0.12 i i i iiiii i i l l i ii i iii i iii!i iigg i i :'='=' ....................... Hydrogen I hour ppm 0.03 - Sulfide (HeS) ' Scientists express concentration of ambient air contaminants in the following units: ppm refers to parts per million by volume, and/~g/m~ is micrograms, per cubic meter. The federal government sets National Primary Standards at levels necessary to protect public health. Similarly, National Secondary Standards protect public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effect of a pollutant. National standards, other than for ozone and those based on annual averages or annual geometric means, must not be exceeded more than once a year. The federal ozone standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with maximum hourly average concentrations above the standard is equal to or less than one over a three year period. For respirable particulate matter, the federal annual standard is based on the arithmetic mean and the state annual standard is based on the geometric mean. 1.10.02(D) Ozone The most important air pollutant in urban areas of Calif(~rnia is ozone. Ozone is a secondary pollutant, formed by a reaction of several compounds in the presence of sunlight. The two most important pollutants creating ozone are oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and certain hydrocarbons, called reactive organic gases (ROG). Carbon monoxide (a product of incomplete combustion) and other pollutants may play a secondary roll in ozone formation. The primary sources of ozone precursors in the Ukiah Valley (as .... ~ ................ ; are automobiles 17In sufficient amount to produce an extinction coefficient of 0.23 per kilometer due to particles when the relative humidity is less than 70 percent. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and Conservation 4, ?age 33 1.10.02(E) Respirable Particulate Matter (PMIO) Paniculate matter is composed of small bits of unburned fuel, dust, ash, soot, soft and other material. Secondary paniculate matter forms when gaseous pollutants combine, creating solid material such as nitrates and sulphate. Paniculate matter irritates the human respiratory tract. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that paniculate matter poses a greater threat to human health than ozone. Initial air standards were set for Total Suspended Paniculate (TSP). In 1986, state and federal agencies revised standards to collect samples of paniculate matter. Only paniculate matter smaller than 10 microns in diameter reaches the lung and has significant adverse health impacts. The present ambient air quality standard for particulate matter reflects this, and fipplies only to such panicles, sometimes called PM~o. It is likely the state will require air districts to develop plans to attain the PM~0 standard during the tenure of this General Plan. 1.10.02(F) Air Qua#ty Monitoring In Ukiah, the District operates a PM]0 sampler located on top of the City library, at the comer of Perkins and Main streets· The District conducts continuous measurement of ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and weather data at 306 E. Gobbi Street. Ambient concentrations of carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides remain well below state standards, u ......... , ,-,,, ,, ..... po~c ,, cont~nuin~ Tables IV. 1-3 and IV. 1-4 provide a summary of ozone and PM~0 monitoring to date. PanicUlate matter air monitoring beg~ in~: in 197I; with~ ~ffilafiOfi 0f aTotal ~end~ ParticUlate ~SP) instnmaent in the do.own area. Nat~o~ ambient standards for TSp~ere ~iOl~:m: I~2, ~74, 75 and ~76 (no data ava~ablelfor :1973):: i More :restrictive redu~ emissions SUffiCiently ~ meet the s~ard through :1986, PM~0 monitoring replaC~ TSP ~:I987 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ilJll Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 34 Locally, CO monitoring in~ ~ Willits typi~ly measures,maximum hourly concentrations of 3 to 4 ppm. The maximum hOurly value measUred at either station 'the past five years is about 6 ppm, and this only occurred on a few occasions. :The C~.:4 modelhas'~n:~ to.evaluate potential CO hotspots for three recent projects in the Uldah area (WalmarL K-Mart, iLovers Lane),' and, under worst case conditions, model'runs show a maximum CO. concentration of abOut 9 ppm for one ihour, or less than one half the maximum allowed'(20 ppm ::~::'ithe state standard)? 1.10.02(G) Sources of Emissions WLetter from David Faulkner, MCAQMD, dated December 29, 1994. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, ?age 35 Table IV. 1-3: Ozone Data for the Ukiah Valley 1980-1993 (ppm) Paniculate matter :emissions .'occur. from .a ~iety ::of :mobile and stationary sources. A ~ 0f m0bile emissions ~ards 'adopted by the CalifOrnia Air'ResoUrces Board in :MarCh 1994 ~di~tes: isevcral .:factors -'~ the history of state- m~ted. :~uctioni:of gas-.and diesel engine e~ions 'for nearly all Vehicles and small utility engineS.; Until 1971:? ~.neW-passenger :cars were alloWed to produce-Up to 2:2 grams per mile of Hydrocarbons (2,2g/m 0f HC), 23 grams per mile of Carbon Monoxide (23g/m of CO). and 4.0 grams per mile of Nitr0gen Oxides (4.0g/m of NOx). By thc end of the 1970's, manufacturers were required to ce~.that their passenger:car fleets .produce only 0A1/m OflHC, 9.0g/m of'CO; and.l,Sglm ofNOx. HC. 7,0glm of:CO.-and 0.4g/m of NOx came into place~ but manufacturers :were only .required to cert~ .that a percentage of their fleet productions met those new standards. By 1989 the percentage of compliance was set arS0% of new fleets, but, as of 1994, 100% of ~.new passenger.car fleets were required to meet those standards. automobile populations that have ~n.subjeCt to the same mingent emissions ards, Table IV, 1,3 reflects stable Or lowering me~rements of ozone production in the ~ah :Valley,: ~' has ~c~ed in ~ite of growing vehicle populations. Beginning in 1998~ 2% of all medium idutY Orl 1~ W~cles:~: ~ifomia will ~ :required to be " " " "mi ~ed as ultra-low :or zero: e.:~ ~lon vehicles, That pementage ts :slated tobecome 15 % ~mthe year 2003. Incentives are;~ready inpla~ for both manufacturers and owners of:: these lOw.or:no emi~ion vehicleS, year from June I to:Sep~mber 30, ~ gas0Iinesold duringRei~ Vapor Pressure (RVP)~On limited to7,8 poUnds per square inch at the pump! The California ARB prepares estimates of daily pollution emissions within the state's air basins, as required by state law. 1991 represents the most recent emission inventory for the county, (published in January, 1994). The District provided point source emission estimates, while ARB staff estimated Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California I~/. 1" Open Space and ConservatiOn 4, Page 36 emissions for area sources and motor vehicles. "Area sources" is a term for the many small stationary sources (i.e., water heaters, consumer solvents) that the District does not permit. E. ,.,..oo ..... v ..... w-,---o sur;cy$ vf homca Table IV.l-4: Ukiah Valley TSP and PM, o Data (~g/m9 :- '~ Air ~"~':"' ~ ..... Table W,l~5 ~lr ~ources ~ards . ~sion ~vento~ for m~l. ~e nm~ers represent ~ entire a~ual emissio~ of a given compo~d, but ~ome activities e~bit a s~aso~l nature. ~or ~x~pl~, a~ost all PM~0 ~missio~ from residential ~ood combustion occurs in just a few ~on~s (~inter). These emission, coupled ~i~ adverse meteorology described above, m~a~ ~at almost all U~ Valley PM~0 violatio~ occur in Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 37 VV Gl I Ilgq,.~llk/I Ig IIIII 133/"~t"~ ... ..,~ '. .,. .. .' ...... ;11 :.-.....-.~......... I~.. ~"tO/ &... -)'/'tO/ IlVl'% GIIIIggl~.~llg 11111 IIl~.~l~.~gg~ Iv~.y I~,/ /u LIJ &dim Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah dl~ Mendocino County, California IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 38 Fuel Combustion Table IV. 1-5: Summary Annual Emission Inventory for Mendocino County (1991) 511 6,205 511 Total Stationary Sources Entrained Road Dust Waste Burning 73 1,022 37 - 110 Solvents 1,095 .... Industrial Processes 37 .... Miscellaneous Processes 146 402 - - 1,460 219 7,629 . 548 1,862 2,592 - 9,855 Petroleum Marketing 475 .... On-road Vehicles 2,701 26,280 3,139 219 256 Other Mobile 1,387 7,665 4,015 1,059 219 !Total Mobile Sources 4,563. 33,945 7,154 ,,,h,,,,,,,,,il,2~~1!i~30.~ Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.1. Open Space and Conservation q, Page 39 Table IV. 1-6: Phase II Motor Vehicle Fuel Specifications Phase II specifications are designed to achieve maximum reductions in criteria and toxic pollutants and in the mass and reactivity of emissions from gasoline-fueled vehicles while providing the flexibility for fuel producers to provide the "cleanest" possible gasoline at the least cost to the consumer. Starting April 1, 1996, ARB regulations for phase 2 gasoline (reformulated) take effect. These regulations affect eight major gasoline properties as shown in the table below. ^ two year extension was granted to small refiners to comply with the sulfur, olefin, T50 and T90 specifications. In addition, the Board has adopted regulations which would set the wintertime exygen content of gasoline at 1.8% to 2.2% by weight to limit carbon monoxide levels. The regulation will apply statewide beginning in 1992, however the control periods vary geographically. The control periods range from 3 to 4 months depending on the geographic region of the state. Fuel parameter Flat limit Averaging Cap Notes Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program iV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, ?age 40 City of Ukiah dl~ Mendocino County, Califomia sulfur, ppmw 40 30 80 benzene, vol% 1.0 0.8 1.2 olefins, vo~% 6.0 4.0 10.0 oxygen, wt% 1.8-2.2 .... 1.8 min. 2.7 max T90, (OF) 300 290 330 T50, (°F) 210 200 220 aromatic HC, 25 22 30 vo~% 7.0 .... 7.0 RVP, psi during control periods dudng control periods Diesel exhaust contributes to a multitude of air quality problems. Diesel Nox plays a primary role in ozone formation, and particulate matter (PM) emissions are a health concern. Sulfur contained in diesel fuel results in sulfur dioxide, sulfates and PM emitted in diesel engine exhaust. Many toxic compounds such as benzene, 1,3-butadiene and formaldehyde are found in the hydrocarbon portion of diesel exhaust. To address these concerns, the ARB in 1988 established the following specifications for diesel fuel sold after October 1, 1993. Fuel parameter Limit Notes sulfur, ppmw 500 aromatic HC, 10% vol % Since 1985 diesel fuel sold in the South Coast Air Basin and Ventura County has met a 500 ppm sulfur standard. 1.10.02(H) The Challenge of Growth and Air Qua#ty Policies reco~ended ~ ~is PI~ address new PM~0 e~sion sources, such ~ l~it~g new residential fireplaces, e~anc~g ~ulation requiremenm, and oriem~g new homes to util~e solar space heat~g ~ w~ter mon~. ~e D~ict ~ also recemly adopt~ ~y new pr~edures such ~ restrict~g bum ~ys ~d e~c~g e~orcemem activities. Major ~d~trial sources of respirable paniculate mauer ~ve also r~uc~ e~ssio~, (exmple, all "tee-pee' wood waste burners have shut down pem~emly). ~er ~mlt~g W~ Paffi::~n; ~e ::~~ seiemh~ Who ~o~e C~E 3 ~: C~~' 4 m~els ~ch estate ~mbient ~neen~atio~ 0fCO Ni~ogen DioXide ~O~ ~ r~ble p~effiate ma~er ~M~O, ~e MeM~o ~ir Q~Ii~ Mamgement DiSffiet a~ .~a CO hO~t m~e~g Will not ~ow violation, even ~der worst e~e ~ffic:~nditio~; ~ 0p~on W~ co byDoa Banff, a Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl[& Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.I. Open Space and Conservation 4, ?age 4] vehiCleS Will be COming into the area ~&e next five y~, it ~ be~unnecess~ to r~e cO.modeling for projects forecasting traffic of 4'5~ to 13,000 trips per day ........ =' ~--:. =.:--1-,,.--.1.- a. a. ' .J .J :-- -'L. ~ 1 .... 1- ' ~L~.IIU~/&~I, && LII~,~ ~.~ l~l~xl l · ~Lll~,~.y V I~JI~IL~,~O ~-~: .... ~. T~ ~.J..l:~.:~_ .~ --..1.1:~ I.~--1,F!. .................. ~. : .... · ~.~-..~ .... 1..,1 1. .... ' 'T'i,~. I OQ@ ~,,1;,c,,,.,,1,, /~1~,,,, i 1,- A --~.J--~-.' .... ~ ~. 1~.6 -~. ......... + .......... I ~ ~ ........ ..1 ..... .1. ......... A .... 61. ......='--~.-1 ~ ~a.: ..... 4 I .,w .,~ l .-. .... .-. ... & A .......-.,.,.;,l~.;..~.q .~, ..,.. ,,q ...,.. ,,,.. .I~A ,. .-, ,,,, . . ,--.,I,A&;.,....-..,~* .,~.~...........,~ .,,.14.1-. --'-----&.--.-~&;.'.l &...'~.~q,;I I. IIII~=~I~,,,,III~,IIL g ~,.~f%,,~l IIIILI, III~ ~,,/1%=/~19111 I!,./I II~,,~llf ~=~191,11,,./ I Ig1.1~ g~k/I, Al~,,f~;~g lflflLII ~.,~tu/t,~'l ILIgl I.%~ ~,,~IIIIL ~..11,.~ L~.II I,.~ ~,.~;~al I,.4~;,,,O1~1 1~;~t,.4 1%~,,,I,,~1,JII ~, ,OLI II I~;'11~ ~.~,./I ILl %,/I L~;I,,,~I II A ..,I .~ ...,I, .........,I...,.I .,.....,...,,......---- SA.- .-..-.-.... o.--- A.'~ ~'. .'. .'. .-. ",-. ;...... · &~fGV~.flU~,~ C~ O~df~dfl II~,~LI~,~C;~L~ufM UIIIIO~,,~I~.~I I II ~ r~A. JAIAe,,~ .'..,I.I;.'..--..,J, ,AA&I---- '..'A.'...'..'--.'~ IA PA.J, ,AA Al'ell"Ail gl~Ai ~IapAiiI&4e~IA,----[~.iA&.~AI A! I Al'.'k."l~ '.a.;,,'JA AA, I. IV.Vt,,/ le/tJi l Il l IGII y .... .-I-' .....:--~...--~--6 ='6 :~ ~.1.~. ........... I. --kl~ .~ 1,.--:__~ ~.~*.1,.~-- !~1 ......... .~ .1. ..... 1..1,.~:_ !~--.-i ,...,.,,. .J--: ...... &~. ..... :~ 1:~:~ .... l~t~ ~1..~1 ...... 1.~-- :g ....I..~.J --1 .... ~! ~..~.~-- .~ 1.~: .... 1,1.. ..... :~1~, ~.. .... .A : ~1~-- ~ !. ..1 ~.~ --~1.. 1 ......3--:..:--~ 1,.,~.. ~1~ '~-']nw. tt 1.10.04 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal 0C-31: ~-;cr"~ print aa~r:r, raac, n i~O~nmre of Valley air qual- ity in order to maintain agricultural viability and human health. 22/Letter from David Faulkner, MCAQMD, dated December 29, 1994. 2~Califomia Health and Safety Code §40918 et seq. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and ConserVation 4, Page 42 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County, California Policy 0C-31./.Concentrate development to encourage mass transit and limit automobile use. Implementation Measure 0C-31.1 (a): Utilize the revised Land Development Code as a means of promoting improved siting of development to reduce vehicle emissions. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure OC-3I. I (b): Consider measures to reduce traffic in other parts of the community to offset emissions (or traffic) not mitigated by site-specific measures. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-31.1 (c): Develop traffic management measures that are designed to discourage through-traffic as a means of reducing emissions. [rimetrame for com- pletion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: Public Works departments] Goal OC-32: Develop standardized air quality mitigation measures. Policy OC-32.1:The City and County shall require all air quality mitigation measures to be reasonable, effective, feasible, measurable, and implementable concurrent with project development. Implementation Measure 0C-32.1 (a): The City and County shall consult with the MCAQMD regarding the effectiveness of mitigation measures proposed by the applicant in developing a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure 0C-32.1(b): When using mitigation measures suggested by the MCAQMD, consideration shall be given to site-specific factors which may make a measure unnecessary or infeasible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] ~JgiA ~.~Wh.,--e~e ~.~LCLAA~ACLA~A~.,~, 4~AACLA,~OA~ ~A CLAA t.~LLgLAAL.~ XAAA~TCL~,,~ ~ALAA LAAAA~.~AAA~ -- . -- . W..~JLAAAL.,V OAAGA~ W %/1 A~ W al, a~ LAA~, _t~aA X~.ACXAAL.~ AVACI, AACa~,,AAAT,~AAt. A~AOLA aI~L ~.%/ Ol.a~t~./~A I, ~b, AAJ,~b, AJ4~L A~A I,A~b,i,~,~AAAAAA&AAA~ ~A,~ LAAA~.,OAA~TA~A~ t~t OA~AAAAA~.,gLAAI. ~b, AAVAXVAAAAA~,~AAL4~A ~AA~.,~,LO, ~,~] gL LAALAA~AAAA AAA~,LAA~.~.S ~TA ~,~gLa~.,LAAgLI, AAA~ ~A~J~,,.,~ ~,~AAAAO~>A~AA~, gL&A~.i ~.~',~ gL AAOL OLgLAA~.~C~A~.& AAAAi. A~CLI, A~JAA _~A~.._~ ............ co,'n,p;~tio;; ° .................. - ' ~* ........... ':-- to-' A4 ........ & r'~ & ,,,~1 iii~i i~i~1~11 i~,~i l~ l~f i~,~%1 · L~r&&L.,,,,y %.,r~,./ ../-r' .L I~;LAL~AAAAL gAZA I~&AO~,,,A~.~LA'*~AAg3.A=~ 43,~.~JAA~=,4~I, LA'JAA~ ~,~ LAA~,~ AVA%~,Ar~L%q~AVAA.I ·~JA A~.,VA~,,,~ 4~,AA~.~ ~,~JAAJAAA~,,,AAL. -- . &II~./&~II&~.,I&&L&&&~.~#& &Y~.L443g&l C. ~,~.~ ,.~'T ~L ~L~/. A AA~=' W,./AL.~ CLAA~,.A %./W,~I.AAAL.~ OAAgLA& ~.~AA~.~L&AL ~ALAA LAA~,~ AV&~,A~AVAJ.~' ~.~.AAAA~i~ %..,,A..~W~Z~. AI. vVAq.,W A~.~A (·.AA ~A,.~.~A~,LAW,.~AA~A,A,~' ~JAWJJt.,I.,~.O. L~.~-tr~r.a#~- t~..~ ................................... to ........ ~,Fc,,-;c,~;c "':'-' P:&nn'ng ~ .......... ""' ...... '" ......... ' P',&nn:,ng ---' · ~b,~.,~JAALAAAb=~AA~.AgLLA~.~AA LAIgLL g~AA~.,43.AAL~ AAAI.,~.,I, ~'V ALAA I~Al~.~ ATA~A~A%q~ATAA.~ ~A l'~.TA L~/ OLALTAAAALLLAA~ Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation 4, Page 43 G ...... ' .... ....."--' "' ...... p:ann: g ....................... .......... ~: .....C~unti MCAQMD '~ :~--':~': ...... ~- ---~"-" '~"'-:~ ...... :-~ -~:-- ~- ~o o~ OC-35: Sup~ ~ qu~ ~d tr~mtion mode~g pro~. Poli~ OC-35.1:Work for ~e creation of a Valley-wide Geographic I~omation System for model~g air and traffic ~pac~. l~lementation Me,urn 0C-35.1 (a): ~ ~e shoa-te~ pla~g period, ~e Ci~ and Coun~ shall cooperate wkh '~c AQMD when develop~g tra~poaation, air quali~ and other resource model~g, and when esmblish~g geographic i~omation system (GIS) tec~ology. ~is policy suppo~ data shar~g with Count, Regional, and State agencies and avoids redundant ms~. [Timot~mo ~or completion: planning period ~ Measure applies to: Ci~ and Coun~ ~ Agency~epa~ent responsible: Ci~ Council and Board of Supe~isors] o~ OC-36: Suppo~ ~d p~icipate ~ the ~ qu~ edumtion pro~ of the MCAQ~. Policy OC-36./:Work with the MCAQMD to create public awareness and education programs about air quality issues. Implementation Measure 0C-36.1(a): The City and County shall assist the MCAQMD in educating developers and the public on the benefits of pedestrian and transit friendly development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Department of Planning and Building, and the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District] Implementation Measure 0C-36.1 (b): Jointly develop and promote seminars on planning that enhances air quality and other community values. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Department of Planning and Building, and the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District] Implementation Measure 0C-36.1(c): During the short term planning period, the City and County shall develop employee education programs about the possibilities of reducing air pollution through personal life-style choices. This program may include the importance of using wood burning appliances appropriately, developing employee rideshare matching, and programs to encourage employees to use non- polluting modes for commuting. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County,.... .., ,"' ........ cf ,"",r--nn;r,.3' ---' '" ........ Ad~istrafion, and the Mendocino u 1,1~1~11% gl [',d &i/EkIIIMII l~4 . County Air Quality Management District] Goal OC-37: Support programs to reduce PM]0 emi~ions. Policy OC-37.]:Work with appropriate agencies to create programs to assist thc agri-business community in developing programs to reduce ranch- or farm-generated dust. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 44 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, California , , Implementation Measure 0C-37.1 (a): During the short-term planning period, work with the Farm Bureau, the University of California, the MCAQMD and farm organizations on educational programs designed to share knowledge and techniques of reducing agri-business generated PM~0. [Timeframe tor completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Department of Planning and Building, and the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District] Policy OC-37.2:Work to reduce particulate emissions from construction activities. Implementation Measure OC-3Z2(a): Include paving requirements ca v ........ dc;'clc, pmcnt o,,,,,,,,,,,~"~-"~ ,,,-~ '~.,,. ZorJng '~,.,,,,,,,.,,~,.- ~ :---~- ~ ~eLand DeVelopment COde. [~moframe for ~mpletion:ShOrt,te~ planning pefi~, ::Measure appliesto: andc0anty ~ A~n- Cy/Dep~nt responsib~; ~ end :.i~ ~UbliC Woks] Implementation Measure 0C-$7.2(b): In the Land Development Code, require measures to reduce particulate emissions from road and site construction, grading, and demolition to the maximum extent feasible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure 0C-$7.2(c): The Land Development Code shall require that new access roads and parking areas shall be covered with pavement or other appropriate material to reduce or eliminate dust· [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure 0C-$7.2(d): Utilize recommendations from the MCAQMD on appropriate dust-control activities, suitable for soil, wind, slope, and other site particulars. Provide for regular inspection of the project's dust-suppression measures. Incorporate dust-control enforcement provisions in all construction permits, and consult with District enforcement staff if a nuisance issue arises from project earth-moving or construction-equipment exhaust. [~meffame~completion: 0~oing planning peri~ ~ .Me·Sum aPplieS to: ~rty and count: ~e. Agency/Deparlment responSible:.C~a~ c0un~ Public WorkS] · 1~1 I l~i.~l~,~Ll~,,~l I. ~'"-"-' -~ ............................, ' to,-' ,.,.,; ....... o..,, ,~,,~."' ...... ~/I IMI t LGI I I I I~lC31 II III I~ ~t~;~l I~b/~l y I~ OC3OL~I O Goal OC-38: Reduce air impacts from space heating. Policy 0C-38./:Require "clean air" heat sources in new construction. Implementation Measure 0C-38.1(a): Through local building codes or ordinances, the City and County shall require primary heat sources in all new development, room additions, or remodels involving space heating to utilize low/no air emission heat sources. Examples may include solar, natural gas, propane, butane, fuel oil, or electricity. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Building Departments] Implementation Measure 0C-38.1 (b): The City and County may restrict or prohibit installation of wood burning appliances in new development. [Timehame for completion: Ongoing Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV. 1. Open Space and Conservation ~, Page 45 planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Building Departments] Implementation Measure 0C-38.1 (c): During the short-term planning period, the City and County plan reviews and inspections shall verify that solar access is optimized and primary heat sources come from low-polluting sources. Special exemptions may be made for oil-fired appliances in out-lying areas not served by natural gas. [Time- frame for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,~ Agency/Department responsible: Building Inspection] Implementation Measure OC-38. I(d): Where wood burning appliances are permitted, dwellings may be required by local Ordinance to (a) incorporate increased insulation or reduced window area sufficient to exceed insulation requirements of Title 24 of the state energy code by 25 % or more; (b) install only EPA-certified wood stoves, fireplace inserts and pellet stoves, and (c) provide energy calculations to substantiate that wood-burning is not the primary heat source. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/De- partment responsible: Building Inspection] -- o &i..,FLL&l. 1,.~J. ull,., l~,.?.'J.(3.t,~l,.ZJ.)~lvllL ~lXI. I1..~..0,3. LIIIIwGwic3111G i1~11 I~Vilii~iIGLi~,iiio VII~,,/III~ ~JIC;IIII III1~:~ ~J,~ll~../t,.i T III~IM~L~IG b~(¢~¢m*~ti~ ~¢as.r~ 0¢-$$.1(¢~: Thc City, County, and the ~cndocino County Air Quality Management District shall develop a program to voluntary retrofit existing homes containing older, highly polluting wood stoves, and fireplaces with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified clean burning appliances. Funding may come from the City, the County, the MCAQMD, developer offset fees, fines or settlements, grants, or other mechanisms. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: AQMD, Building Departments] Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 2 NOISE 2.01 GENERAL DISCUSSION OF NOISE IV.2. Noise ~, Page 1 lie NOISE ELEMENT GUIDELINES require that major noise sources be identified and quantified by preparing generalized noise contours for current and projected conditions. Significant noise sources include traffic on major roadways and highways, railroad operations, airports, and representative industrial activities and fixed noise sources. There are many technical terms used in the Noise Element. All are included in the Glossary. The Noise Element is one of the seven mandatory elements required in a General Plan. This Element applies only to the City of Ukiah, and is not applicable in the unincorporated Planning Area. Outside the City limits, the Mendocino County Noise Element applies. Noise modeling techniques and noise measurements were used to develop generalized L~ noise contours for the major roadways, railroads, the City of Ukiah Municipal Airport and fixed noise sources for existing (1990) conditions. See Figure IV.2-F for the location of noise measuring sites. Noise modeling techniques use source-specific data including average levels of activity, hours of operation, seasonal fluctuations, and average levels of noise from source operations. Modeling methods have been developed for a number of environmental noise sources including roadways, railroad line operations, railroad yard operations, industrial plants and airports. Such methods produce reliable results as long as data inputs and assumptions are valid. The modeling methods used in this report closely follow recommendations made by the State Office of Noise Control, and were supplemented where appropriate by field measured noise level data to account for local conditions. The noise exposure contours are based upon annual average conditions. Because local topography, vegetation or intervening structures may significantly affect noise exposure at a particular location, the noise contours should not be considered site-specific. ~The Noise Element is applicable exclusively to the City of Ukiah and does not apply in the Planning Area. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 2 City of Ukiah Jill, Mendocino County, Califomla ~I~ ~4oend°cin° t ! NOISE TYPE MEASURED ~ Short-term Community O 24-Hour Community O Traffic N~ SCALE IN FEET 0 1000 3000 SO00 NOISE DATA SITES Figure IV.2-F: Noise measurement sites Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 3 60 dB Ldn (1990) ~ee eee ~ee eee 60 dB Ldn (2010) SCALE IN FEET ..r==L_l 0 1000 3000 5000 .7' TRAFFIC NOISE Figure IV.2-G: Traffic noise contours- 1990 and 2010 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah · Mendocino County, California IV.2. Noise 4, Page 4 1200 Distance (feet) 1000 8OO 6OO 40O 200 0 10 I I I I I I I i 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 ^verage Daily Traffic (xlO00) lO0 Posted Speed -- 35 mph ~ 40 mph ~- 45 mph ~ 50 mph -'<- 65 mph Figure IV.2-H: Distance to 60 dB Ld. Contour (Arterial Traffic) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 5 A community noise survey was conducted to determine existing noise levels in noise-sensitive areas within the City of Ukiah General Plan Planning Area. The results of the survey were used to develop noise level performance standards in order to maintain an acceptable noise environment. In conjunction with the technical noise analysis and General Plan Guidelines requirements, the community direction associated with noise levels and noise impacts centered on the definition of a "Discomfort Threshold Contour" (DTC). This is defined as the 60 dB contour that is used to separate noise sensitive receptors from noise sources. 2.02 Transportation noise 2.02.01 Summary of major findings Transportation can adversely impact adjacent residential and recreation areas. The Federal Noise Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108) was used to develop L~ contours for U.S. 101 and North and South State streets in the City of Ukiah General Plan Planning Area. The FHWA Model is the analytical method presently favored for traffic noise prediction by most state and local agencies, including Caltrans. The current version of the model is based upon the California Vehicle Noise (CALVENO) noise emission factors for automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks, with consideration given to vehicle volume, speed, roadway configuration, distance to the receiver and the acoustical characteristics of the site. The FHWA Model predicts hourly L~ values for free flowing traffic conditions, and is generally considered to be accurate within 1.5 dB. To predict L,~ values, it is necessary to determine the hourly distribution of traffic for a typical 24-hour day and to adjust the traffic volume input data to yield an equivalent hourly traffic volume. Short-term (15-minute) traffic noise measurements and concurrent traffic counts were conducted for traffic on U.S. 101 (See Figure IV.2-G). The measurements were made to evaluate the noise exposure due to traffic on U.S. 101. The purpose of the traffic noise level measurements was to determine the accuracy of the FHWA model in describing the existing noise environment at the project site. Noise measurement results were compared to the FHWA model results by entering the observed traffic volumes, speed and distance as inputs to the FHWA model. Based upon the modeled versus measured traffic noise levels, the FHWA model was found to accurately predict U.S. 101 noise levels at the measurement site. Traffic data representing annual average traffic volumes for existing conditions were obtained from Caltrans and KD Anderson traffic consultants. Day/night traffic distribution and truck mix were based upon Caltrans and Brown-Buntin Associates (BBA) file data. Using these data and the FHWA methodolo- gy, traffic noise levels as defined by L,~ were calculated for 1990 traffic volumes. Distances from the centerline of selected roadways to the L~a contours are summarized in Table IV.2-1 and shown on Figure IV.2-H. Contours were developed for U.S. 101 for the years 1990 and 2010. The year 2010 traffic noise contours are based upon traffic volumes contained in the Caltrans Highway 101 Route Concept Report. The traffic volumes contained in the Route Concept Report are based upon general historical trends in traffic growth along U.S. 101, and are not based upon buildout of the City of Ukiah General Plan Update. However, the 2010 traffic noise level data contained in Table IV.2-1 is useful in developing the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California IV.2. Noise ~, Page 6 Table IV.2-6: Traffic Noise Contour Data distance (feet) from center of roadway to Ld. contours 1 2 3 4 7 ~0 ~2 ~3 River Road to East Perkins Street East Perkins St. to North State Street North State St. to Lake Mendocino Dr. Central Ave. to Parducci Road Parducci Road to Hensley Creek Road Hensley Creek Rd. to KUKI Lane KUKI Lane to Garrett Dr. Garrett Dr. to Clara Ave. Clara Ave. to Seminary Ave. Seminary Ave. to Freitas Ave Freitas Ave. to Washington Ave. Washington Ave. to Meadow Brook Dr. Meadow Brook Dr. to S.R. 253 451 496 462 ;~:;:;:;:,,~;:;,:;::,;.;:;.;.;.;~ .,-,;.;..;.;,;.;.;.;<.:,;,;.;.;,;.;.;.;,;,;.;,;. 57 ~2~ 113 102 113 145 80 635 635 635 These calculations do not include consideration of shielding caused by local buildings or topographical features, so the distances reported in Table IV.2-1 are worst-case estimates of noise exposure along roadways in the community. Traffic noise contours were not calculated for all roadways within the City of Ukiah plan area. However, Figure IV.2-H, prepared using the FHWA Model, may be used to estimate the distance to the 60 dB L,~ contour for projected volumes of arterial traffic. For arterial traffic, the predicted distance to the 60 dB L~ contour is determined by the Average Daily Traffic Volume (ADT) and the posted speed limit. L~a contours derived from Figure IV.2-H are only indicators of potential noise conflicts. A more detailed analysis is required to determine traffic noise levels at any given location. Railroad activity in the City of Ukiah includes freight activity on the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SPTCo) line which travels north/south through the City of Ukiah. SPTCo officials at San Francisco Operations Office report that one scheduled local freight train operates through Ukiah 6 days per week. The scheduled operation generally occurs during the nighttime hours. According to SPTCo officials, the average speed of the local freight train is 19-20 mph. The operational information was used as inputs to the "Simplified Procedure for Assessment of Noise Emitted by On-Line Railroad Operations", prepared by Wyle Laboratories in 1974. This methodology for predicting railroad noise exposure is recommended by the State Office of Noise Control, and is considered to be reasonably accurate for generalized noise contour development. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 7 To ensure accuracy of the Wyle method for determining railroad operations noise levels, BBA used £fle data for slow moving trains and the above-described number and distribution of daily train operations to calculate noise levels associated with the local freight train operation. The La, contribution from a single nighttime train operation may be calculated with the following formula: Ldn = SEL + 10 log Neq- 49.4 dB, where: SEL + 10 log Neq- 49.4 dB is the mean SEL of the number of events, Neq is the sum of the number of daytime events (7 a.m. to 10 p.m.) per day plus ten times the number of nighttime events (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) per day, and 49.4 is 10 times the logarithm of the number of seconds per day. Based upon the above-described noise level data and methods of calculation, the Ld, for the freight train operations can be determined. Operational information and estimated L~, values are shown in Table IV.2-2. Table IV. 2-7: Railroad line operational information and estimated noise levels The data contained in Table IV.2-2 indicate' that the Wyle Laboratories method for predicting railroad line operations noise levels yields values approximately 9 dB higher than the computed La,, values. The computed Laa values were based upon single event noise level data collected by BBA for slow moving trains, which included the use of warning horns. The difference between the La,, value estimated with the Wyle method and the calculated L~a value is assumed to be due to the fact that actual train speeds in the City of Ukiah are slower than those which are assumed in the Wyle method. As a conservative estimate, the Wyle Laboratories method was used for predicting the distance to the 60 dB L,~ railroad line noise contours. Figure IV.2-I shows the location of the railroad line operations noise contours. Future use of the SPTCo line through the City of Ukiah is not certain. Presently there is discussion regarding promoting commuter and recreational passenger service along the line. The Mendocino Council of Governments (COG) is currently drafting policies which promote increased use of the rail corridor. The North Coast Railroad Authority is in the process of acquiring the rail right-of-way through Ukiah, and will be involved in developing an operations plan for future use of the rail corridor. Based on the state's Cal Rail usage projections, near term future use of the rail corridor is expected to increase. However, the increase is expected to be related to freight activity, and is anticipated to result in an increased number of rail cars, but not an increase in the number of trains. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, California IV.2. Noise 4, Page 8 SCALE IN FEET 0 1000 3000 5000 RAILROAD NOISE Figure IV.2-1: Existing railroad noise contours Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise ~, Page 9 Table IV. 2-8: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure Transportation Noise Sources Residential 603 Transient Lodging 603 Hospitals, Nursing Homes 603 Theaters, Auditoriums, Music Halls Churches, Meeting Halls 603 Office Buildings -- Schools, Libraries m Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks 70 45 m 45 -- 45 -- 35 40 45 45 Discussions with the Mendocino COG, North Coast Railroad Authority and Cal Rail indicate that predicting future use of the rail corridor for passenger trains is premature. A feasibility study for rail traffic along the rail corridor is in the process of being conducted, and estimates of future railroad activity should be based upon the projections which will be contained within that report. 2.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal NZ-I: Stabiliwe or reduce transportation noise impacts on adjacent residential. Policy NZ-1.1: Inventory noise contours for major traffic corridors, the railroad, and the airport. Implementation Measure NZ-I.I(a): The City shall schedule an update to the mobile noise source analysis when the Element is updated. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period ~I, Measure applies to: City ~t, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Planning Department] Policy NZ-I.2: Residential zoned land shall be located as much as possible outside of the Discomfort Threshold Corridor (DTC) of existing transportation corridors. Implementation Measure NZ-1.2(a): When reviewing proposals for new residential or recreational development, ensure that design measures are incorporated to separate the new uses from the existing or projected DTC. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~I, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure NZ-1.2(b): New development of noise-sensitive uses shall not be permitted in areas exposed to existing or projected noise which exceed the levels specified in Table IV.2-4 unless the project design includes effective mitigation measures to reduce noise in outdoor activity areas and interior spaces to the level Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomla IV.2. Noise ~, Page 10 specific in Table IV.2-4. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: City ~t, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] implementation Measure NZ-].2(c): Expansion of existing roads must be designed using ac- cepted acoustical engineering features -- examples include Iow landscaped berms, landscaping, below-grade construction, and speed control -- to minimize expansion of the existing DTC. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ~, Measure ap- plies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Public Works Department] Policy NZ-].3: Use appropriate construction techniques to reduce interior noise exposure for residences built within a DTC. Implementation Measure NZ-1.3 (a) : In the revised Land Develop- ment Code reference the standards of the Uniform Building Code to require construction methods to reduce indoor noise levels to acceptable Building Code standards. [Timeframe tot completion: Intermediate-term planning period ~, Measure ap- plies to: City ~ Agency/De- partment responsible: Planning Department] Policy NZ-1. 4: Encourage programs to reduce impacts from aircraft. Hourly L,q, dB 50 45 Maximum Level, dB 7O 65 Implementation Measure NZ-1.4(a): During the short term planning period, the City airport shall initiate a notification program to notify pilots of the one thousand (1,000) foot ceiling for f'Lxed-wing aircraft over congested areas. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Aviation] Implementation Measure NZ-I.4(b): During the short-term planning period, the airport shall initiate a public education program designed to reach appropriate pilots to request that recreational overflights -- such as ultralight craft and balloon -- avoid hovering, circling, or making repeated passes over the same geographic area as a means of reducing noise nuisance to those on the ground. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period · Measure applies to: City ~ Agency/Department responsible: Department of Aviation] Implementation Measure NZ-1.4(c): At such time that scheduled passenger aircraft begin to use the airport, require that commercial passenger service aircraft comply with the best available noise equipment standards to reduce noise impacts on the ground. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Aviation] Policy NZ-I. 5: Disclose potential airport noise impacts on property transactions in the airport area. Implementation Measure NZ-].5(a): During the short-term planning period, the City shall enact an ordinance requiting that the following statement be included in all property transactions or as a part of the issuance of use permits for property or projects within the airports's area of influence, both core and peripheral. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 11 "This project/residence is in close proximity to the Ukiah Municipal Airport which is a major noise generating source. Development in this area will be subject to overflights of aircraft taldng off from and landing at the airport. These aircraft include privately owned corporate jets and fire fighting air tankers from the California Department of Forestry. It is anticipated that the volume of traffic and resulting noise may increase in future years." [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Department of Aviation] Policy NZ-1.6: Incorporate sound reducing measures in new construction around the airport. Implementation Measure NZ-1.6(a): The City shall enact appropriate code changes to require that interior noise levels conform to requirements of the Uniform Building Code. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] 2.03 Stationary source noise 2.03.01 Summary of major findings Industrial can adversely impact other land uses. Existing residences within the noise contours noise identified in Table IV.2-3 (also known as the Discomfort Threshold Contour or DTC) generated as a result of industry-related noise, may result in becoming the source of complaints about excessive noise if the property changes hands without the new owners understanding that their new residence may be subjected to high noise levels. Many industrial processes result in noise ~ven when the best available noise control technology is applied. Noise exposures within industrial facilities are controlled by Federal and State employee health and safety regulations (Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] and Cai-OSHA). Exterior noise levels are controlled by local standards. Commercial, recreational and public service facility activities can also produce noise which affects adjacent sensitive land uses. From a land use planning perspective, fixed-source~ noise control issues focus upon two goals: to prevent the introduction of new noise-producing uses in noise sensitive areas, and to prevent encroachment of noise sensitive uses upon existing or potential noise-producing facilities. The first goal can be achieved by applying noise performance standards to proposed new noise-producing uses. The second goal can be met by requiring that new noise-sensitive uses in proximity to noise producing facilities include mitigation measures to ensure compliance with noise performance standards. 2.03.01(A) Major fixed noise sources The following descriptions of existing fixed noise sources in the General Plan study area are intended to be representative of the relative noise impacts of such uses, and to identify specific noise sources which should be considered in the review of development proposals. All of these luted noise sources are outside of the City. · The Masonite Plant operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Major noise sources associated with the hardboard plant include industrial processing, stack scrubbers, blowers, conveyor systems, heavy trucks to and from the site, and front end loaders operating on the site. Operational noise level data was collected for the Masonite Plant on October 3, 1991. ~"Fixed-source' noise generator is the term assigned to a specific land use that generates noise from a specific location, such as an industrial facility. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, Califomla IV.2. Noise ~, Page 12 An average noise level of 63 dB and a maximum noise level of 68 dB were measured at a distance of 600 feet from the main plato, and approximately 100 feet from the property boundary. The estimated location of the 50 dB L~ noise contour is shown on Figure IV.2- -J. The Louisiana Pacific Sawmill and Planing Plant operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Major noise sources associated with the plant include truck traffic to and from the site, blowers, large saws and wood planers. Noise level data collected near the plato site indicated an average noise level of 60 dB at a distance of 300 feet from the cemer of the lumber yard, and 50 feet from the entrance to the plant. The estimated location of the 50 dB L~ noise comour is shown on Figure IV.2-J. The Parnum Paving Company is located along North State Street, north of Pomo Lane. The Parnum Paving Company is an asphalt batch plant which operates during the daytime hours. Major noise sources associated with the Parnum Paving Company include heavy trucks to and from the site, from end loaders which move material on the site, and the operation of the batch plant. Noise level data collected at the plant indicated an average noise level of 54 dB at a distance of 250 feet from the asphalt plato. The estimated location of the 50 dB L~ comour is approximately 400 feet from the batch plato, and is located outside of the Plan Area map boundary. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 13 ~Masoni! 50 dB Leq Ford Gravel SCALE IN FEET 0 '1000 3000 5000 FIXED POINT NOISE Figure IV.2-J: Fixed noise source contours Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California IV.2. Noise ~, Page 14 · The Ford Gravel Company is a concrete batch plant which operates during the daytime hours. Typical noise producing operations associated with the Ford Gravel Company include the arrival and departure of heavy trucks, onsite front end loaders which move batch plant materials, loading of concrete tracks with ready-mix at the batch plant, and vibrating shakers on the batch plant. Noise level data collected at the plant indicated an average noise level of 62.5 dB at a distance of 100 feet from the property line. The estimated location of the 50 dB L~q contour is shown on Figure IV.2-J. · Mendocino County Fairgrounds. The Fairgrounds were not being used during the preparation of the Noise Element. The facilities allow a variety of activities that may generate noise. These range from outdoor concerts to vehicle races at the track, as well as anything drawing a large crowd. 2.03.01(B) City of Ukiah Municipal Airport The City of Ukiah Municipal Airport is located at the south end of the City of Ukiah, and is bordered by South State Street to the west, U.S. 101 to the east and Hastings Avenue to the north. The City of Ukiah Municipal Airport is a public use airport which is operated by the City of Ukiah. According to the 1990 California Aviation System Plan (CASP), the airport has one runway with a heading of 15/33, and a runway length of 4,415 feet. The CASP reports that the airport has 103 based aircraft with a total of 50,000 annual operations. According to the CASP, the existing based aircraft include 92 single engine piston, 9 multi-engine piston and 2 rotorcraft. Discussions with the airport manager on October 2, 1991 indicate that the number of based aircraft reported in the CASP is consistent with 1991 estimates. Approximately 65 % of the aircraft depart on runway 15 to the south. However, depending on wind direction, this percent may change on any given day. The majority of residences in the City of Ukiah are located to the north and west of the airport. Approximately 90 % of the aircraft which depart to the north on runway 33 make a 15 degree right turn beginning at approximately Gobbi Street, and then proceed south. This procedure avoids flying over the majority of the residential developments. Some aircraft which depart on runway 33 will continue a straight-out departure, and will fly directly over residential developments. The most recent airport master plan was adopted on March 17, 1971, and the last airport layout plan was adopted in December 1974. The City updated its Airport Master Plan in 1995, and it is scheduled to be adopted by the City Council and the Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission before the end of 1995. There are no Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)2 contours which have been developed for the City of Ukiah Municipal Airport. Based upon discussions with the airport manager regarding flight tracks, aircraft operational procedures and runway usage, CNEL contours were developed for the Ukiah Airport for a peak day, which includes CDF firefighting tankers, and for an annual average day. See Figures IV.2-K and IV.2-L for predicted locations of the City of Ukiah Airport CNEL contours. g} Crop dusting aircraft City of Ukiah staff have expressed concern about the noise associated with crop dusting activities. Aerial application aircraft are frequently used to spray crops or to spread seed or fertilizers. There are many types of fixed or rotary wing aircraft used for aerial application, including aircraft with radial and turbine engines, and 2- or 3-blade propellers. Most of the noise impacts generated by aerial application aircraft occur as the result of propeller noise and the low altitude at which the aircraft are typically flown. One of the most widely used aerial application aircraft in the Ukiah area is the Cessna Ag Wagon. 2CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level means the average equivalent sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of approximately five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and ten decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ifil' Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 15 To characterize noise impacts associated with aerial application aircraft, BBA utilized file data collected for the Cessna Ag Wagon aircraft at the Bettencourt Flying Service air strip near the Town of Delhi, in Merced County, California. Consultation with aerial application aircraft operators, field observations, and noise measurements indicated that it was not practical, nor representative of perceived noise impacts, to prepare CNEL contours for frequent operations by aerial application aircraft. This is because aerial application operations generally follow the shortest possible route to the application site at a minimal altitude, meaning that there are no typical flight tracks. Typical "ferry" altitudes range from 50 to 150 feet based upon information previously collected from crop dusting companies. Noise level data collected at the Bettencourt Flying Service air strip in Merced County for Ag Wagon operations indicate that noise levels produced by aircraft flying directly overhead with an estimated altitude of 150 feet were about 105 dB Lm~ and 106 dB SEL. Crop dusting activities generally occur during the early morning hours, when people may be sleeping. Single event noise levels from aircraft arrivals, departures and overflights may cause sleep disturbance at nearby residences. The noise level at which a sleep stage change or interruption occurs is highly individualized. A persons' level of sleep is dependent on many factors including fatigue, exhaustion, stress, room temperature, bed comfort and noise level in the room. For these reasons, a single number criterion for the evaluation of sleep interference has not been established. According to the Noise Effects Handbook published by the National Association of Noise Control Officials, behavioral awakening will most likely occur with noise levels of 70 dB or above. However, duration of the noise exposure, background noise levels and type of sound generated by the source are all important factors. ~ California Department of Forestry (CDF) Air Tanker Operations The City of Ukiah staff indicated that the majority of noise complaints associated with airport operations are related to the CDF air tanker operations. The airport staff estimated that on a peak day up to 45 air tanker operations may occur. The majority of the CDF air tanker fleet is comprised of Gmmman S-2 aircraft. The CDF also uses Cessna 337/0-2 aircraft for reconnaissance and patrol. The CDF aircraft typically depart from the airport and make a 15 degree turn to the east, and try to avoid flying over residential areas. These aircraft are typically at a low altitude during takeoff because they are fully loaded, and therefore may be considered noisy. The existing Gmmman S-2 aircraft which are used by CDF have a reciprocating propeller engine. However, the CDF is currently retrofitting the S-2 aircraft with a turboprop engine which is expected to be considerably quieter. The Peak Day CNEL contours for the Ukiah Municipal Airport (Figure IV.2-L) are dominated by S-2 flights. By a wide margin, the noisiest airplanes which routinely use this airport are the Deparlment of Forestry air tankers. We may draw an analogy to ambulances or fire tracks which also generate noise, but which citizens willingly tolerate because of the benefit received. Noise levels for the Gmmman S-2 air tankers have not been measured. Suffice it to say, being radial piston engines of Korean War vintage, they roar with all the authority of their two 1525 horse power engines. They are loud and can easily disrupt ordinary conversation at over a mile. Fortunately, their flights are generally restricted to daylight hours from late June until mid October and then usually only when a fire is being fought. ~ Corporate aircraft Corporate jets are also noisy and use the airport throughout the year. It should be noted that newer planes, especially jets, are both more efficient and less noisy than older models, with reductions in noise levels of about 15-20 decibels, a significant decrease (FAA, 1990). As CDF replaces its fire fighting aircraft, citizens can expect the newer equipment to be quieter. The same holds tree for the corporate jets. 3Lm~: Maximum loudness means the maximum sound level recorded during a noise event. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~1, Mendocino County, California IV.2. Noise 4, Page 16 On balance, the annoyance for noise is outweighed by the usefulness of the aircraft involved and their importance to the community. 4, General aviation noise levels General aviation aircraft ordinarily do not pose a noise problem outside the perimeter of the airport boundary. Their noise levels are comparable to large trucks, and are less noisy than some leaf blowers. Noise levels typically are 90-100 decibels or below at 100 feet from the plane. However, a low overflight or a missed approach may result in episodic higher noise levels to those directly below the aircraft. 2.03.01(C) Methods of mitigation California standards have been developed for maximum aircraft noise levels. The California Administrative Code Title 21 states, "The standard for the acceptable level of aircraft noise for persons living in the vicinity of airports is hereby established to be a community noise equivalent level of 65 decibels" (Hodges and Schutt, 1991, Page 5-4). Moreover, the regulations stipulate that certain kinds of land uses are incompatible near airports. These include residences of all types, public and private schools, hospitals and convalescent homes, and places of public worship. These standards are identical to the ones set forth by the FAA. Hodges and Schutt (1991) state, "An important policy implication of overflight annoyance is that of disclosure to owners and prospective buyers of property near an airport of the nature and extent of the airport's activities and the plans for its future. Policies requiring some form of buyer notification for residential uses in an airport's vicinity are recommended. The intent of a buyer awareness or disclosure poffcy is to enable those who are particularly sensitive to overflights to avoid moving into the affected areas" (Page 5-7). Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 17 dB III III III III III a~r~ 0 ~G~t~er~n_LPA~n & Growth Mnn~ EXISTING AIRPO Figure IV.2-K: Existing average annual day CNEL airport noise contours Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California IV.2. Noise 4, Page 18 Figure IV.2-L: I t I I I 6O dB Peak Fi 65 dB CNEL .... °~eak Fire Day FIRE AIRCRAFT Ex/sting peak day (fire fighting activities) CNEL airport contours Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise ,e, Page 19 Compatibility for these uses near an airport can be achieved if the structure can be insulated such that indoor sound levels are no more than 45 decibels. This of course must be specially designed into any project with the help of architects, civil engineers and subsequently overseen by the authorities. The State also has standards for noise mitigation through sound insulation. For residences other than single family detached houses, the interior noise level must not exceed 45 decibels. Any residential structure within a noise level contour of 60 decibels is required to possess additional sound insulation in order to meet the noise standards. Mitigating for noise impact at this airport is difficult given the sporadic flight schedule of the air tankers. When the air tankers are active, the single noise events are widespread and very loud. When the tankers do not fly, only those areas directly under the takeoff paths are likely to exceed noise standards, and then only when jets and certain twin engine planes are within ~/~ mile of the airport. Land use compatibility ordinances can be adopted on the basis of single noise events (Hedges and Schutt, 1991) but at the same time some compromise is reasonable in order to balance the noise of the air tankers against the public good achieved, and to take into account ordinary economic growth and development. This issue is a difficult one to resolve, but notification can ease this potential conflict. Thus, as well as noise measurement and mitigation, there is a clear need for notification and disclosure to buyers of property anywhere near the airport. Such a disclosure should notify potential buyers of the airport's activity, its major noise generating sources, and indicate some idea of future noise. This notification will go a long way in avoiding later conflicts. This area must include both the prescribed region where aircraft activity is common, but also those areas below and around which corporate jets and air tankers operate. 2.03.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal NZ-2: Reduce industrial noise impact through the enforcement of appropriate build- ing and land use codes. Policy NZ-2.1: Maintain an inventory of noise contours for existing and future stationary sources. Implementation Measure NZ-2.1 (a): When the City schedules a General Plan update, include the Noise Element in the program. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term plann- ing period ~, Measure applies to: City ,~ Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Policy NZ-2.2: Ensure adequate analysis of noise impacts when reviewing project permits. Implementation Measure NZ-2.2(a): As a part of an application for any new construction for industrial facilities, the City shall require an estimate of noise levels from stationary sources as measured at the property line. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,e Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Policy NZ-2.3: Land use designations shall follow State of California noise and land use com- patibility guidelines. Implementation Measure NZ-2.3(a): New development of noise-sensitive uses shall not be allowed where the noise level from non-transportation noise sources exceeds the noise level standards of Table IV.2-3 as measured immediately within the property line of the new development, unless effective noise mitigation measures have been incorporated into the development design to achieve the standards specified in the table. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah tl~ Mendocino County, California IV.2. Noise 4, Page 20 Implementation Measure NZ-2.3(b): Noise created by new proposed non-transportation noise sources shall be mitigated to a level at or below the standards of Table IV.2-3, as measured immediately within the property line. This measure does not apply to noise sources associated with agricultural operations on lands zoned for agricultural use. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] .......~. ~.: .... d-L~l~ ~.~ --~.-1 .... :---.1~-- 1 .... 1~ ~.~ All ..... ............ ' ............. A~ t ..... ~ ...... ~ ,,-,, ,-,,*,,,,t-,,~,,,.,,,. ,-,,,~,-,,,,~ ~ ..... ,,,,~ ~,~,,,.,,., ~ ' '-' '":"' Policy NZ-2.4: Protect existing residential areas from future noise impacts. Implementation Measure NZ-2.4(a): When a new industry or an expansion of an existing industry will enlarge the DTC and impact adjacent or nearby non-industrial areas, noise-abating construction techniques or methods, such as berms, below-grade location, sound walls, dense vegetation screens, or similar technically acceptable methods shall be utilized to reduce the noise to levels within the existing DTC. [Timeframe ~o~¢ompletion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Planning Department] 2.04 Community noise levels 2.04.01 Summary of major findings E xcessive amplified sound for personal entertainment or self-expression can adversely impact another citizen's desire for peace and quiet. Short-term noise monitoring was conducted for the preparation of the Noise Element. Each site was monitored three different times during the day and night so that valid estimates of L,~ could be prepared. Two long-term noise monitoring sites were established within the City of Ukiah to record day-night statistical trends. The data collected included the L~ and other statistical descriptors. Measured noise levels and estimated L~ values for each site are summarized in Table IV.2-5. Monitoring sites are shown in Figure IV.2-G. Community noise monitoring systems were calibrated with acoustical calibrators in the field prior to use. The systems comply with all pertinent requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Type I sound level meters. The community noise survey results indicate that typical noise levels in noise sensitive areas (such as residential neighborhoods) of the City of Ukiah General Plan study area are in the range of 48 dB to 53 dB L,~. Noise from traffic on local roadways, distant industrial activities, Ukiah Municipal Airport operations and neighborhood activities are the controlling factor for background noise levels in the majority of the study area. In general, the areas of the City of Ukiah General Plan study area which contain noise sensitive uses are relatively quiet. The Lg0 values shown in Table IV.2-5 represent background noise levels, where there are typically no identifiable local noise sources. The L~0 values represent median noise levels. The Lm values in Table IV.2-5 represent the average noise energy during the sample periods, and show the effects of brief noisy periods. The L~ values were the basis of the estimated I~ values. L,~ values show the maximum noise levels observed during the samples, and were typically due to passing cars, aircraft overflights, or children playing. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.2. Noise 4, Page 21 The 24-hour noise monitoring data in Figure IV.2-G show that ambient noise levels reach a minimum during the hours of 1-5 a.m., increasing during the daytime hours as a function of increased traffic and other human activities. Noise enforcement may be put into place through several different methods. First, enforcement usually rests with the Health Department. Although the Police Department may enforce "noisy vehicles" and "loud activities,' the Health Department usually enforces ongoing or peak noises from business and industry. The City, which does not have a health department, could assign noise enforcement to a code enforcement officer. With proper training and equipment, the officer would respond to calls about ongoing noisy situations, make appropriate measurements and use the normal code enforcement process to abate the noise. 2.04.02 Goal NZ-3: Policy NZ-3.1: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Respect individuals' rights to avoid exposure to excessive or unwanted noise. Enforce noise regulations. Implementation Measure NZ-3.1 (a): Provide for effective enforcement of a Noise ordinance. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Planning Department AND pOLICY DEPARTME~ Implementation Measure NZ-3. I(b): Enforcement shall be supported through appropriate training and budget allowance. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ilJli, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.3. Safety 4, ?age ! 3 SAFETY THE one the seven mandatory General Plan elements. Its content aims at SAFET~ ELEMENT is of protecting people and property from natural hazards. While the Safety Element is required to address fire, flooding, geologic, and seismic hazards, the City and County are permitted to address other locally relevant safety issues. The Safety Element is the primary method connecting safety to city and county land use decisions. The City and the County will establish land use planning programs responsive to safety issues through the Land Use Element Siting Criteria and in the land development code. The Safety Element provides a means of establishing basic hazard mitigation programs. This results in a streamlined development process, because safety related mitigation measures can be designed into project applications prior to environmental review. Decisions related to zoning, subdivisions, and other entitlements 'can be tied to the Element's identification of hazards and hazard abatement provisions. 3.01 Seismic safety and geologic hazards 3.01.01 Summary of major findings Geology is the study of the earth. In a simple model, the Valley's geology can be divided into two basic units -- the bedrock unit and the valley fill unit. The bedrock unit generally follows the topography of the two mountain ranges. The valley fill unit occurs under the relatively fiat areas. On the slopes of the Mayacamas Mountain and Coastal Range, the geologic hazards related to the bedrock units include mass earth movement such'as landslides and complications to grading operations on the slopes. In addition to earthquakes, potential geologic hazards within the Planning Area include slope/mass earth movement, grading, seismic activity, and flooding. Potential geologic problems in the valley fill unit relate to shallow ground water and compressive soils -- which can cause a structure to settle. In addition, during an earthquake, the earth movement generates a vibration that can induce liquefaction. Flooding is also probable in the central portion of the valley fill unit bordering the Russian River. The entire planning area is subject to the potential for a large seismic event. A portion of the eastern part of the Ukiah Valley follows the trace of the active Mayacamas fault. "~-~:~'OW~l~, ~,,,,,,,,,o'~"'":"~ ~quake Fault Zones" (Alquist-Priolo Fault Study Area) have been delineated by the State Division of Mines and Geology. This "zone" identifies areas for which State law requires detailed studies for development to mitigate earthquake damage through site and building design. It may also be prudent to study seismic impacts for projects located near the ~-~:~' ,~,..,~..A~ ~,~,, .... ~,,,,,~,,,o ~ oi0 FaUlt Zones. These are generally identified in Figure IV.3-M on page 3. The planning area presents a wide variety of geotechnically related challenges to development. For the most part, these can be solved through creative design and construction techniques. Grading plans and careful site design are important means of overcoming geologic hazards. Geologic and geotechnical investigations with detailed, site specific information for grading forms the backbone for hazard mitigation in the planning processes. Implementation of the recommendations of a geotechnical team with the project design as well as during construction will greatly reduce the potential for long term geotechnical problems. Earthquake faults identified in the Planning Area trend from the southeast to the northwest, a tendency that occurs in the Mendocino Highlands -- the geologic name for this area of the state. Over millions of years, portions of the Highlands were dropped by fault movement resulting in the main north- northwesterly trending valleys in the County, including the Ukiah Valley. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah/l~ Mendocino County, Califomi=, IV.3. Safety e ?age 2 Both native slopes and those modified by grading require special consideration in the Planning Area. Landslides have occurred in the Ukiah Valley over the years. Although the Ukiah Valley has not experienced landslides dropping houses into ravines or down the hills -- a more common occurrence in the Bay Area and Los Angeles area -- the potential for such incidents does exist. Geologic studies in the Valley have determined that there are several large ancient landslides located in Spanish Canyon, Gibson Canyon, and the Robinson Creek drainage. Steep mountain slopes are susceptible to "colluvial debris slides." These are rapidly moving types of surface landslides that occur during torrential rains. The landslide is eminent when the ground is already saturated by high rainfall and the water becomes trapped or "perched" between the surface soils and bedrock. The excess moisture causes the topsoil to literally lift up and slide off the bedrock by force of gravity. It is similar to hydroplaning in a car. Improper hillside grading practices have resulted in potentially unstable cut slopes and uncompacted fills in the Planning Area. The result of poorly engineered grading may be landslides or foundation failures that can adversely affect hillside residences and access roads. Much of the Valley is located over a rock formation called "serpentine." All areas underlain by serpentine are particularly susceptible to landslides, both debris flow landslides and deeper seated bedrock landslides. A study by the California Division of Mines and Geology in 1993 found that there are improperly compacted or uncompacted fills in the western Ukiah foothills. This may cause problems for foundations of homes built on the fills. The study also found that most of the bedrock units do not hold compacted fills wells. This is a result of over-sized rock fragments and an inadequate percentage of cohesive native material in the mix to ensure that a fill adheres to the side of a hill. When discussions occur about "slopes" and "grades,' the terminology includes both percent of slope and degrees of slopes. Environmental and technical professionals utilize the terminology for different purposes -- even though both are descriptions of slope steepness. Table IV.3-10 provides a conversion of common slope factors. The first column measures the slope in terms of a distance/elevation ratio. For example a horizontal to vertical ratio (horizontal distance:vertical distance) shows the distance on level ground (horizontal) it takes for the ground to rise a certain distance (vertical). This ratio is then shown as degrees of slope in the second column. The third column converts the ratio to a percentage. The fourth column provides very broad and general development considerations and comments describing the slope. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah JI]l, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.3. Safety 4, ?age 3 r* shows location .st-Priolo Figure IV.3-M: Location of Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah/l~ Mendocino County, Califomi~, IV.3. Safety 4, Page 4 Table IV.3-10: Slope Conversions and Development Considerations %:1 =63° 200% Slopes that may be roughly termed 'vertical cliffs" are actually about this steep. There are very few of these steep cliffs in the Ukiah area. 1%:1 --33° 66.6% Debris flows typically originate on slopes of 30 to 35 degrees. The angle of response of many earth materials is usually about 30 to 35 degrees, depending on grain size and angularity of particles. Fill slopes are neady always unstable at this angle and erode by ordinary seasonal rainfall. Roadcuts in hard unjointed bedrock may locally be stable at this slope angle, provided the slope is carefully investigated by a Certified Engineering Geologist. 3:1 -- 18%° 33.3% Unsupported planes of discontinuity (joints, foliation, or bedding planes), which dip out-of-slope at about 18 degrees represent a slope stability concern if they occur on steeper natural slopes (on the order of 30 to 35 degrees). ^ theoretical maximum volume of landslide mass is thereby developed. 6%:1 =9.1° 16% This is the legal maximum design grade for a road which can be negotiated by a fire truck. 50:1 --1 o 2% "Level" pads for homes should be designed for at least 2 percent grade for adequate positive drainage of rainwater away from the perimeter of the home. No house pad should ever be at less than a 2 percent grade. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.3. Safety ~, ?age 5 3.01.02 Goal SF-I: Policy SF-I. 1: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal SF-2: Policy SF-2.1: Regulate new development in fault zones. Avoid urban-scale development within Alquist-Priolo ~qtmke Fault Zones. Implementation Measure SF-1.1 (a): No new construction shall be permitted within Alquist- Priolo Fault Zones without appropriate geotechnical studies which define setbacks and appropriate density or intensity of development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure SF-l.I(b): With the exception of the already-developed Talmage Rural Community, new Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, or Commercial land uses shall not be sited within the Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone. [T/meframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure SF-I.I(c): Geotechnical evaluations prepared by a California licensed engineering geologist (CEG) shall be submitted to the City or County prior to road, infrastructure, or site development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones. If a discretionary permit is required, the geotechnical report shall be submitted with the application for the permit. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Regulate development across or near earthquake faults outside the Alquist- Priolo ~quake Zone. Provide development guidelines for building outside Alquist-Priolo ~e Fault Zones. Implementation Measure SF-2.1(a): Geotechnical evaluations prepared by a California licensed engineering geologist shall be submitted to the City or County prior to site development along or near identified active and potentially active faults. If a discretionary permit is required, the geotechnical report shall be submitted with the application for the permit.[Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure SF-2.1(b): The Land Development Code shall address minimum standards for development near earthquake faults to provide a method for implementing site-specific geotechnical studies. The Land Development Code shall define the distance within which the studies are required based on information and support from the California Division of Mines and Geology. Emphasis of geotechnical analyses shall address seismic reaction of soils -- both saturated and unsaturated conditions -- slope stability under static and seismic loads with implications to roads, utilities, and other infrastructure. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~I, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Policy SF-2.2: Protect people and property from un';,'a~an~ed landslide danger. Implementation Measure SF-2.2(a): Geotechnical evaluations prepared by a California licensed geologist shall be submitted to the City or County prior to site development along identified areas of potential landslide or earth movement activity. If a Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California IV.3. Safety 4, Page 6 discretionary permit is required, the geotechnical report shall be submitted with the application for the permit. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Moa- sure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure SF-2.2(b): The Land Development Code shall contain provisions for development on hillsides in general and for development on hillsides that may be prone to slide or earth movement. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure SF-2.2(c): Provisions of the Hillside Development ordinances shall be incorporated into the Land Development Code. [Timeframe for completion: Short- term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department respon- sible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] 3.02 Flooding, dam inundation, high groundwater 3.02.01 Summary of major findings There are two types of flood hazards in the Ukiah Valley: One, potential inundation if the Coyote Dam at Lake Mendocino were to break; two, flooding which results from heavy rains overloading the drainage system. 3.02.01(A) Coyote Dam inundation The width and elevation of the Ukiah Valley on each side of the Russian River provides a large, wide channel through which water can flow if Coyote Dam were to fail. Because of the volume of water in the lake, the wall of water from a total failure and a full reservoir would travel north up the Russian River channel to a point north of Highway 20, and then south well out of the Planning Area. The topography of the channel would keep the water constrained between the bluffs and North State Street until the Rural Community of Calpella. The dam inundation area shows the potential for the community to be flooded. The greatest damage will likely occur to the south. Inundation is predicted to occur within most creek channels from the river nearly to the base of the foothills on the west side of the Valley. The main channel of flooding would likely follow US 101 or State Street, whichever is further west. The depth of the inundation water is such that it could reach Pinoleville on either side of Ackerman Creek. Within the City of Ukiah, the inundation limits reach Dora Street between Gobbi Street and a line coming west from Talmage Road. Figure IV.3-N shows the projected innundation area. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.3. Safety 4, Page 7 · location ,te Dam .area. I ! I ! Figure IV.3-N: Lake Mendocino Dam Innundation Area Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California IV.3. Safety ~, Page 8 In the southern portions of the Planning Area, the water has a large land area in which to fan both east and west of the Russian River, although the model projects that most segments of US 101 south of Talmage Road will be underwater. The Rural Community of Talmage would have portions of its west side inundated. All of the Valley's water treatment facilities and sewage disposal facilities are within the inundation limits of a Coyote Dam failure. The two hospitals in Ukiah are outside the boundaries, although Adventist Hospital on Hospital Drive is at the edge of the inundation area. The City's police, fire, and Civic Center are outside the inundation limits. The Ukiah Valley Fire Station on South State Street borders the limit line. The Mendocino County Sheriff's Department is also very close to the line. Ukiah's Municipal Airport has portions of the south end of the runway within the limits of the dam inundation area. 3.02.01(B) Flooding as a result of storms Studies by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) with later supplemental studies submitted by the City or County report areas of potential flooding due to severe storms. Because of the size of the basin draining into the Russian River and its historic channels, the width of the Russian River channel through the Planning Area ranges from a narrow point of six hundred feet at the Rural Community of Calpella to a bulge of 7,500 feet just north of Plant Road. In normal years, the river maintains the current channel it has carved through the center of the Valley. During moderately severe storms (called ten year and fifty year storm events), the river can rise within this channel and overtop its current banks. Within flood plains established by FEMA, property owners may be required to obtain flood insurance as a condition of mortgage approval. The areas subject to flooding are shown on maps called the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) that are prepared by FEMA. The City and County participate in the FEMA flood insurance program. This allows property owners to obtain subsidized insurance rates. It also requires the City and County to establish development standards for construction within the One Hundred Year Flood Plain. The "One Hundred Year Flood" refers to the severity of the storm; one hundred year floods have a one percent chance of occurring during any given year. Typically the standards developed by a City or County can range from limits on the intensity of development to requirements to raise the "habitable floor" of the structure to at least one foot above the One Hundred Year Flood peak elevation. Primary areas subject to one hundred year storm-induced flooding include The Forks Rural Community and North State Cc~-r, crclal/Irld"~rlal Complex. Within the City, the one hundred year flood can reach as far west as US 101. Although flood-proofing measures have been used for many years to reduce flood damage in areas of inundation, development in the City and to the north increases the velocity of floodwater and expands the width of the flood zone in the agricultural lands south of the City. When the Russian River overtops its banks, flooding is also likely to occur on the tributary creeks that traverse the canyons into the river. Orr Creek, Doolin Creek, Gibson Creek, and Robinson Creek have flood channels with the potential to inundate significant portions of residential areas near the channels's centerline. Mill Creek and Sulphur Creek have a record of flooding a zone nearly one thousand feet wide through Talmage and the Vichy Springs Road area respectively. 3.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal SF-3: Protect new development from flooding. Policy SF-3.1: Ensure adequate standards for development within the One Hundred Year Flood Plain. Implementation Measure SF-3.1 (a): The Land Development Code shall incorporate standards and restrictions for development within identified floodplains or areas subject to inundation by a one hundred year flood. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jill' Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.3. Safety 4, Page 9 period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] Policy SF-3.2: Avoid development in the Russian River floodway. Implementation Measure SF-3.2(a): Establish site development standards to ensure that new development within the Russian River floodway is kept to the absolute minimum. · ., ,,. ...... ~rc,~,-'zy, The standards shall prohibit development within the floodway except as permitted by Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Program standards and regulations. [Timeframe for compleUon: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Department of Planning, Department of Planning and Building] G oal SF-4: Strive for a flood-safe community. Policy $F-4.1: Avoid critical public facilities in areas subject to flooding. Implementation Measure SF-4.1(a): To the extent feasible, the public agencies shall avoid constructing new critical facilities -- public safety, public health, water and sewer treatment facilities -- within areas subject to one hundred year floods. It is recognized that certain facilities must be sited to meet other development or regulatory criteria, and as such are not precluded from building within a flood plain if the flood-prone location is a feasible site. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] 3.03 Fire and wildland fire protection and prevention 3.03.01 Summary of major findings Fire protection is provided in the Planning Area by three agencies. Thc California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDFFP) has primary responsibility for wildland fire suppression. Within the City limits, the Ukiah Department of Public Safety -- combined police and fire departments -- has primarily responsibility. In most of the unincorporated Planning Area, the Ukiah Valley Fire District has primary responsibility. Within the City limits, the City is also responsible for primary response to wild land fires. 3.03.01(A) Urban fire protection and prevention The City of Ukiah provides fire protection as one of its City services. Prior to 1988, the City also served as the fire department for the Ukiah Valley Fire District. Beginning in 1988, the District implemented its own administration, prevention programs, and suppression responsibility. Both the City and the District utilize a combination of paid firefighters and reserve volunteers. During the period of 1973 through 1994, the number of fire calls have decreased, while the number of medical calls increased significantly to nearly three-quarters of all fire department calls in both the City and the District. The number of emergency responses in the Planning Area has increased significantly over the past 20 years. Combining District and City data, the average annual number of responses have increased from 793 (1973-1977) to 826 (1978-1982) to 1,130 (1983-1987) to 2,706 in 1993. The dollar loss from fire damage has been decreasing as a result of fewer emergency calls for fire suppression. The decrease in fire calls and losses come from a combination of sources. Increased training and more available full time and volunteer staff provide better response to fire calls. The equipment used by fireflghters has improved and been modernized by the City and the District. New fire regulations and new building technology at the local and state level have improved the resistance of structures to fire. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah Jl[ll Mendocino County, California IV.3. Safety 4, Page 10 Development of low cost smoke detectors and requirements for mandatory installation of detectors in residences also has had a significant effect in the reduction of fire damage. There are still opportunities for improvement and enhancement to the fire services. As the Valley increases its role as the center of business and commerce for the Mendocino-Lake County areas, more commercial and industrial buildings will be constructed. Commercial and industrial uses have larger buildings, higher property values, and a greater number of persons exposed to risk. In addition, most commercial and industrial buildings have some hazardous or toxic materials stored or in use. Pre-planning from the permitting through the construction stage ensures that the primary fire responder has information about the design of the building, location of storage, and the types of materials in the building. In addition to pre-planning, a secure "key vault" allowing fire department access to the building can save time and damage when an emergency occurs. Fire control sprinklers greatly decrease risk from fire danger in these buildings. As residential development begins to move higher up the hillside, urban development is encroaching into high fire danger areas. Within the City, the western hills are a high fire danger area, where special development requirements are needed to ensure safe emergency access, appropriate onsite water supplies, and proper structural materials and landscaping to resist fire. Additionally, evacuation routes may be required to move residents out of fire-prone areas and move in fire equipment. In the County, similar conditions also occur within the Ukiah Valley Fire District territory. Some of the private property may be in areas in which the State imposes its "fire safe standards." To provide flexibility between both local needs and State requirements, the Land Use Element requires conformance to "fire safety standards" for all new subdivisions and building permits. ~ In addition, the District has the flexibility to enact its own local ordinance or adopt development requirements. Ongoing development will increase demand for service in both the City and the County Fire Districts. The fire departments will need to accumulate funds for capital equipment or facilities. These funds can be collected through impact fees, special assessments approved by voters, or through the sale of voter- approved bonds. Imposing any special revenue program requires conformance to State laws related to public funding. The City has a ~catastrophic Event :Response:.Plan, :sometimes c~led an ~emergency response plan,' that provides for :emergency .:evacuation mutes and the management of the emergency with other area agencies. This Plan is incorporated into~the ~General Plan by reference so that the General Plan'does not need to be revised every time the City revises the response plan. :The Catastrophic Event ReSponse Plan is periodically updated by the PubliC Safety Department. Thelastupdate'was in 1994 and 1995, which had pot.been presented..to the council at .~.~:tirae the Ge~ral:plan::was: first.~0pted:~ The City is moving towards increasing the technology of fire prevention and "fast response." For many years, commercial and industrial land uses have been required to install sprinkler systems. Recently, home-based sprinkler systems that are acceptable from both an aesthetic and functional basis have begun appearing in residences. The City Fire Department wants to see sprinkler systems required in all new construction -- residential, as well as commercial and industrial. 3.03.01(B) Wildland fires The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection is responsible for wildland fire response and suppression. The Department also provides structure protection services to the County for areas not ~"Fire Safe Standards," 14 CCR 1207, are the minimum requirements established for public and private development by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah/l~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.3. Safety ~, Page 11 within the Ukiah Valley Fire District boundaries. CDFFP has flying tankers based at the Ukiah Municipal Airport during the fire season as well. Wildland fires move quickly through the dry brush on the hillsides. The manzanita and scrub vegetation have high oil and fuel contents that burn quickly with extreme heat. To minimize the impact of fire on residences and other structures, CDFFP imposes the "Fire Safe Regulations" that require minimum standards for access, lengths of dead end roads, slope of roads, and clearance of flammable vegetation around structures. Of the 113 total number of CDFFP fire responses in Fiscal 1993-94, 36 were from careless burning, ten caused by campfires, and eleven were arson. The City also enforces fire code regulations in hillside areas within the incorporated boundaries using the state standards as the model. 3.03.01(C) The Valley-Wide Task Force In 1991, the joint citizen committee called the "Valley-Wide Task Force" was seated with the responsibility of review and recommending changes in the administration and management of public services in the Ukiah Valley. The Task Force completed its work with a series of findings and recommendations, many of which are incorporated into the General Plan. The role of the Task Force was to find a way to provide the citizens of the Ukiah Valley with better and more efficient governmental services. The Committee concluded that fire service in the Ukiah Valley is above average based on the expectations of the area and service in similar communities.2 The City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley Fire District work effectively together to provide the most efficient response possible. Both the City and the District increasingly integrate volunteer firefighters into operations. The volunteers greatly enhance the service level in the Valley, and improve the cost effectiveness of the agencies. As the population grows, the need for cooperation will be even greater. The issues related to jurisdiction and efficient response may, in the long term, lead to the consolidation of the two agencies. The Task Force was concerned that the Valley's current catastrophic emergency response capabilities are at unacceptable levels. Steps must be taken to develop and implement an Action Plan to coordinate the resources of both the public and private sectors in responding to catastrophes. Since the Task Force submitted its recommendations, a Valley-wide "Emergency Response Plan" has been prepared. The Plan was undergoing review at the time the General Plan was being prepared for adoption. The Task Force recommended the formation of a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) to optimize the delivery of fire service in the Ukiah Valley. The JPA is intended to include representatives from the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley Fire District. The goal of the JPA is to provide training, hazardous material response, and coordinated purchasing. 4.1.~& ..... :..,!~ ~'~-- ~--~--~--~.. ........~.:~-- --~..~.~ ~--.3 &l.. .......... · ~,1~ *.1. .............. .'*.1~ ~&l,. 2Ukiah Valley-Wide Task Force, "Report and Recommendations" (Ukiah: City of Ukiah, August, 1991), p. 12+. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California IV.3. Safety ~, Page 12 3.03.02 Goal SF-5: Policy SF-5.1: Goal SF-6: Policy SF-6.1: Goal SF-7: Policy SF- 7.1: Goal SF-8: Policy SF-8.1: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Standardize the delivery of fire protection services. Improve the quality of service throughout the Planning Area. Implementation Measure SF-5.1(a): By the conclusion of the long-term planning period, achieve a maximum response time appropriate to the size of the territory served by the Fire Protection agency. [Timeframe for completion: Long-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and Ukiah Valley Fire District ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Fire Department, Ukiah Valley Fire District] Implementation Measure SF-5.1 (b): Provide coordinated training between the City and District fire fighters. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and Ukiah Valley Fire District ~, Agency/Department responsible: Fire Departments] Improve ln.~urance Service Office (I$O) ratings. Optimize the ISO ratings of the individual fire service organizations, while continuing to balance cost/quality trade-offs. Implementation Measure SF-6.1(a): The City, County, Special Districts, and the State shall work together to implement ISO recommendations and take steps necessary to maintain or improve the areas' ISO ratings.3 [Timeframe forcomple§on: Ongoing plann- ing period ~, Measure applies to: City, County,4 and Ukiah Valley Fire District; State involvement cannot be mandated + Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors, Fire District Board] Improve the fire safety of*new buildings as appropriate to protect life and property Improve fire safety systems as appropriate for residential, and appropriate commercial, and industrial uses. Implementation Measure SF-7.1 (a): Within the land development code or the building code, develop standards when to require the installation of sprinkler systems in a~ residential, and appropriate commercial and industrial uses as prescribed in the Uniform Fire Code as amended locally. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~ Agency/Departmentresponsible: Division of Public Safety Department] Continue to maintain cooperative and mutual aid agreements. Maintain aid agreements between agencies to ensure maximum utilization of Valley resources. Implementation Measure SF-8. I (a): Review resources available to each fire service provider and define the most appropriate agreements to provide Valley residents with maximum fire protection. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Mea- sure applies to: City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire District ~, Agency/Department respon- sible: City Council, Board of Supervisors, Fire District Board] 3It is recognized that based on Insurance Services Office ratings, the City and the District will ultimately reach an ISO level that is the best achievable level for either the City or the District. The intent of this measure is to ensure that the agencies work to maintain ISO levels that are cost effective for the communities. nCounty involvement is through the Development Review process. The County has the ability to enforce fire safety standards needed by the District through its Zoning, Subdivision, and other Development Codes. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah · Mendocino County , Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.3. Safety 4, Page 13 Goal SF-9: Coordinate equipment and inter-agency communications. Policy SF-9.1' Maintain common or inter-linked communications facilities. Implementation Measure SF-9.1 (a): Ensure that all communication equipment is capable of receiving and transmitting to other emergency response agencies in the Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire Distdct 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, County Sheriff and Emergency Services, Fire District Board] Policy SF-9. 2: Coordinate equipment purchases for financial savings and compatibility. Implementation Measure SF-9.2(a): Join together to purchase equipment in order to increase agencies' buying power when feasible and ensure the compatibility of equipment. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire District 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors, Fire District Board] Goal SF-10: Increase public education of fire prevention. Policy SF-IO. 1: Inform property owners and residents of the need to prevent fires and protect people and property from damage. Implementation Measure SF-IO. 1 (a): During the short-term planning period, the District and the City shall work together to prepare an informational brochure that explains how to implement fire safety standards at home, work, and play. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and Ukiah Valley Fire District 4, Agency/Department responsible: Fire Departments] Develop a Valley-Wide Catastrophic Emergency Response Plan. Develop a plan to address immediate-term emergency response in the hours and days following a catastrophic emergency. Implementation Measure SF-11.1(a): Using a mutually empowered group or joint powers authority -- and incorporating private sector expertise -- during the short-term planning period, the City, the Ukiah Valley Fire District, California Highway Patrol, and CDFFP, and the County Emergency Services Office shall work together to prepare a Valley-wide Catastrophic Emergency Response Action Plan. The Plan shall be developed by a committee of representatives from both the public and private sectors. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure ap- plies to: City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire Distdct 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, County Office of Emergency Services, Fire District] Implementation Measure SF-11.1 (b): The Action Plan shall be a practical, working document, which addresses the first seventy-two hours following the catastrophe. The plan shall, at a minimum, define emergency response process, identify available resources and a comprehensive communications strategy. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire District 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, County Office of Emergency Services, Fire District] implementation Measure SF-]].I(c): As part of the Plan's development, the Committee shall conduct a public assessment of local emergency needs and investigate how other areas are handling emergency preparedness. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire District 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Council, County Office of Emergency Services, Fire District] oal SF-12: Establish "Fire Safety Standards." Goal SF-11: Policy SF-11.1: G Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County, Califomi~ IV.3. Safety 4, Page 14 Policy SF-12.1: In coordination with the State Fire Safe Standards (14 CCR §1207), ensure locally- oriented fire safety requirements. Implementation Measure SF-12.1 (a): During the short-term planning period, the City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire District shall prepare and adopt "Ukiah Valley Fire Safety Requirements" that at a minimum address site development standards, structure flammable vegetation clearance5, road access, and provisions for peakload water supply. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City, County, and Ukiah Valley Fire Distdct 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, County Office of Emergency Services, Fire District] 3.04 Police services and public safety The City of Ukiah maintains a 24-officer Police Department, consisting of the Public Safety Director, 2 Captains, 5 Sergeants, and 16 Patrol Officers, in addition to 2 part-time Community Service Officers, and 1 part-time Animal Control Officer. The Department performs all the duties and assignments typically associated with protecting the community, and securing the public's safety, and the Department maintains an exemplary record in performing these functions to the highest standards. In addition to the typical police and public safety functions, the Department maintains the 9-1-1 emergency dispatch service; provides animal control; maintains both a police cadet and police reserve program; provides in-school programs to teach self esteem and drug awareness; contributes one officer to the Mendocino County Drug Task Force; cooperates and coordinates with outlying police agencies (sheriff, highway patrol, etc.) to provide service beyond the City limits; and maintains the Community Oriented Policing program which assists community groups such as Neighborhood Watch in deterring crime in various areas of the community. In order to provide the highest quality police services to the community, the Department functions according to a Mission Statement, which includes the following tenets: Provide the highest possible level of service to our community; · Ensure the safety of those who live and visit here; Protect the lives and property entrusted to our care; Defend the constitutional rights of all people, and; Help create and preserve a safe and secure environment. Beyond the City limits, the Mendocino County Sheriff's Department provides police and public safety services for County residents. The Sheriff's Department also maintains the County jail, and provides bailiffs for Superior Court. Both the County jail and the Sheriff's Department headquarters are located within the City limits on Low Gap Road. 5Fire clearance on hillside lots should be done to hillside development zone standards. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah JlJl, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.4. Energy 4, Page I 4 ENERGY 4.01 Overview THE 1973 OIL EMBARC_,O created a national awareness that energy is an essential resource. Fossil fuels provide for the majority of the nation's energy needs. The quantity of these fuels are finite with the largest reserves located within foreign counties. At one time nuclear power was expected to develop into a replacement energy source. ~St~ public controversy concerning facility safety and the problems associated with the disposal of nuclear wastes, combined with the high cost of building and operating a plant, however, have diminished the attractiveness of nuclear power as a replacement energy source for fossil fuels. Public policy on energy efficiency has, in the past, been dictated by concerns for national security and economic viability. Emerging as an equal concern, however, is the environmental degradation caused by burning fossil fuels. The burning of fossil fuels creates air pollution and increases atmospheric concentrations of infrared-absorbing gases, such as carbon dioxide. These increases have been associated by some scientists with global warming. This has provided the impetus for stronger public policy on energy efficiencies, vehicle fuel economies and emission policies. The U.S. Department of Energy's goals are to improve the efficiency of energy utilization, increase energy production from renewable resources and reduce the United State's dependence on imported energy. Similar goals are now shared by privately- owned utilities. Within the Ukiah Valley, as in most communities within this country, fossil fuels still provide most of the energy consumed. Gasoline, natural gas, propane and part of the Valley's electrical supply are all derived from fossil fuels. The Valley's best opportunity for reducing its dependence upon fossil fuels is to increase the efficiency of energy used within structures and for transportation. The largest use of energy is for automobile transportation, with heating and cooling within structures ranked second. Economic forces, both regional and local, have an effect on the feasibility and availability of alternative transportation systems. Energy savings can be realized by establishing land use patterns to optimize public transit, the use of bicycles, and availability of pedestrian paths. Local governments can lead the Valley in reducing its dependence on fossil fuels by promoting alternative methods of transportation (walking, bicycling, and carpooling), energy efficient mass transit; the use of renewable energy sources (hydro, solar, wind and biomass); and increasing the efficiency of energy used within structures. The benefits of doing so include reducing the amount of money sent outside of the community to buy energy, increasing local employment opportunities, and increasing the environmental and aesthetic qualities of the Valley. 4.02 Land use 4.02.01 Summary of major findings The types amounts energy a community are greatly affected by land use patterns and of within and their associated transportation impacts. For instance, a sprawling, low density urban pattern increases dependency upon automobiles and therefore fossil fuels by limiting oppommities for mass transit use, bicycling and walking. Land use patterns are largely regulated through the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. As a result, both the City of Ukiah and the County of Mendocino can have a dramatic influence on energy use within their own jurisdictions. The efficiency of energy use within the Ukiah Valley can be increased by planning land use patterns to reduce dependence upon automobiles. This can Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California IV.4. Energy 4, Page 2 be accomplished by locating relatively dense residential development, as well as major new employment and retail centers, along public transportation routes. Additionally, single family land uses should have safe bicycle and pedestrian access to shopping, employment and nearby residential neighborhoods. 4.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal EG-I: Create land use patterns which facilitate the conservation of energy. Policy EG-I.I: Locate shopping, employment and recreation opportunities within walking or bicycling distance of proposed and existing housing. Implementation Measure EG-1.1 (a): The Land Development CodeI shall incorporate standards and incentives for new development to provide safe and reasonable access for pedestrians and bicyclists. [Timeframe for completion: Short term planning period 4, Mea- sure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure EG-I.I(b): The Land Development Code shall allow for mixed-use developments. [Timeframe for completion: Short term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 4.03 Transportation 4.03.01 Summary of major findings Transportation activities account for approximately 28 percent of all energy use within the United States. Personal passenger transportation is the largest consumer, accounting for about 58 percent of all transportation energy use. The personal auto is more energy intensive than other forms of passenger transportation, but not by as much as many may think. Average fuel efficiency for cars in use today is approximately 18 miles per gallon (mpg). In comparison, an urban transit bus achieves an average of 36 mpg per passenger. Consequently, an auto with two passengers, or an auto with one passenger but twice the average fuel economy, has roughly the same passenger fuel efficiency as a bus. Mass transit, however, has the added benefit of reducing traffic congestion and associated air pollution. Progress has been made toward raising average vehicle fuel economy. However, these gains have been countered by increases in overall travel. The Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1975 introduced average fuel economy standards; the average fuel economy for new cars is 28 mpg. Various auto manufacturers have developed high fuel efficient prototype vehicles. Fuel economies of these vehicles have ranged from 50 to nearly 100 mpg. The prototype vehicles tend to be smaller with lower acceleration performance than today's cars. Additionally, California has mandated that by 1998, two percent of all cars a manufacturer sells in the state must produce no tailpipe emissions. The requirement increases to five percent by the year 2000 and ten percent by 2003. In response to air quality concerns, alternative fuels have been developed. Mixtures of methanol and gasoline are being used. Natural gas and liquid petroleum gas (LPG) are also being considered as ~Land Development Code refers to a new compilation of ordinances that will replace the zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and associated development ordinances by placing them all within a single code section Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.4. Energy ~, Page 3 alternative vehicle fuels. PG&E is promoting the use of natural gas powered vehicles. It has several natural gas vehicle (NGV) fueling stations in California and is working with Shell Oil Company to install natural gas compressors at selected service stations. Many of the NGV or LPG vehicles operating today are company fleet vehicles. Local governments within the Ukiah Valley can play a role in transportation energy management. They can promote pedestrian and bicycle travel, car-pooling and mass transit. Further, the City and County can set an example for private industry by developing fuel efficient vehicle fleets and developing on-site carpooling programs for their employees. 4.03.02 General Plan goals, policies and implementing programs Goal -2: Improve the efficiency of energy use within the private transportation system. Policy EG-2.1: Encourage the use of alternatively powered vehicles. Implementation Measure EG-2.1(a): The City shall explore a program of offering a range of incentives for alternatively fueled automobiles. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentre- sponsible: Electric Utility Department] Goal EG-3: Improve the efficiency of energy use within the City's and County's vehicle fleet. Policy EG-3./:The City and County shall serve as models for programs to operate fleet vehicles at maximum fuel efficiency. Implementation Measure EG-3. l(a): Perform regular maintenance on fleet vehicles to ensure they are operating at peak fuel efficiencies. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: General Services] Implementation Measure EG-3. l(b): Coordinate work schedules and site visits so that ~ employees and elected officials sham vehicles whenever feasible. [Time- frame for cornpletion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: General Services] Implementation Measure EG-3.1(c): The City and County shall develop a model program for their fleets of vehicles which ensures the following: The most energy efficient vehicles available are brought on line whenever replacement vehicles are needed and to the greatest extent possible. Replacement vehicles are comprised of the least air polluting options available; and Alternative fuels which create the least air pollution shall be used whenever available, practical and fin~cial!yfea$ible. [Timeframe for completion: Long- term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Administration and vehicle fleet managers] Policy EG-3.2: Support car-pooling. Implementation Measure EG-3.2(a): Work with Caltrans and large employers to promote car- pooling.[Timefrarne for completion: Ongoing planning period ,t, Measure applies to: City and County ~t, Agency/Department responsible: Local Transportation Commission through the Mendocino Council of Governments] Implementation Measure EG-3.2(b): Develop incentives, such as preferred parking places at government buildings, for city employees who car-pool. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ,t, Agency/Department re- sponsible: General Services] Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi-t IV.4. Energy 4, Page 4 4.04 Site planning and landscape design 4.04.01 Summary of major findings The layout of streets and lots can play an important role in facilitating long-term energy conservation. Long after individual buildings are demolished and new buildings replace them, the initial layout of streets and lots continue to influence energy use demands and design options available to the community. Most developments in the Ukiah Valley were designed with little or no consideration of energy efficiency. Many of these developments cannot take advantage of solar energy due to their lot or building orientations restricting solar access. As familiarity with the relative low cost and simplicity of solar design increases, more and more people will be imerested in developing solar energy sources for their homes and businesses. In order to facilitate future solar energy use, energy-related planning needs to occur now. In relatively low-density hillside developmem, lots should be laid-out so that the maximum number of building sites have solar access. Housing densities on wooded, north-facing slopes should be low, as these sites are likely to remain relatively cold and damp during the winter, creating,a less comfortable living environment and requiring more energy to heat. On larger sites structures should be clustered to maximize solar opportunities. Energy requirements for heating and cooling buildings are also strongly influenced by local climatic conditions. Large areas of unshaded pavemem, such as wide streets or parking lots, absorb and radiate heat which can significamly increase summer temperatures. This in mm can substantially increase the costs of cooling nearby structures. Trees create shade which can significantly reduce a building's cooling needs while providing a more comfortable outdoor environmem. Trees which are too small, too tall, or too narrow should not be used because they will provide limited or no benefits. The best tree species for micro-climate enhancemem are broad, low, and deciduous, preferably losing their leaves relatively early in the fall. 4.04.02 General Plan goals, policies and implementing programs Goal EG-4: Maximize on-site solar energy use, especially in new developments. Policy EG-4.1: Incorporate solar energy considerations into the design, review and approval of all developmem. Implementation Measure EG-4.1(a): Streets and lots shall be oriemed-in such a way as to maximize design opportunities for passive solar heating and cooling. Streets shall be generally oriented east to west unless topographical, engineering, and other significant visual considerations can be shown to warrant other design characteristics. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Services] Implementation Measure EG-4.1 (b): The Land Development Code shall provide setbacks and height limitations that provide for optimal solar air and water heating and cooling opportunities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Services] Implementation Measure EG-4.1 (c): The Land Development Code shall require structures and landscaping in Planned Unit Developments be located to maximize solar access. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.4. Energy 4, Page 5 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Services] Implementation Measure EG-4. I (d): The Land Development Code shall require hillside lots be configured to maximize solar access through clustering units or building sites on south-facing slopes whenever possible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Services] Implementation Measure EG-4.1 (e): The Land Development Code shall include incentives for project designs in all zoning districts which respond to principles of solar access and design. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Utility Department, C~ Planning Depa~nt; County B~ildi~g a~ Plan~ing Sewi~s] Goal EG-5: Site design shall incorporate shade trees for energy conservation. Policy EG-5.1: Encourage minimum canopy coverage of all paved area on a lot. Implementation Measure EG-5.1(a): the Land Development Code shall include in its design requirements the requiremem that all new developmem shall provide a canopy coverage of 50% at maturity of all paved areas on the lot.2 [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Planning Department and Department of Planning and Building Services] 4.05 Building design 4.05.01 Summary of major findings Building design is a significant factor in energy efficiency. Buildings which fail to respond to site and climatical factors are more difficult and costly to cool in summer and heat in winter. As energy costs continue to climb, energy efficiency and solar design features have increasingly become cost effective. In 1976, Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code was amended to include energy conservation measures, particularly increased insulation standards. In addition to existing codes, local governments can take steps to encourage these features and stimulate more energy efficiem developmem. The City is in a unique position to encourage energy efficiency in building design because of its development review functions and because it owns the local utility agency. Simple passive solar design features which are both cost effective and energy efficient include orienting buildings and placing windows and roof overhangs to receive the winter sun and deflect the summer sun; windows which open; thermal drapes or shutters; increased wall, roof, and floor insulation; double glazing of glass doors and windows; and attached greenhouses or solariums for direct solar heat gain. In addition, there are a variety of active solar design features which can be cost effective under the right circumstances, such as solar water heating. Existing structures can increase their energy efficiency through upgrading their insulation, appliances, equipment and weatherization. They can also be retrofited with solar design features. As an example, lighting retro-fits can greatly increase the energy efficiencies of existing commercial buildings. 4.05.02 General Plan goals, policies and implementing programs :The objective is to try to obtain a fifty percem canopy over parking areas. The Land Developmem Code shall set the performance or other standards for site specific consideration. This footnote is a part of Implementation Measure EG5. l(a). Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califom!= IV.4. Energy ~, Page 6 G oal EG-6: Promote energy efficiency features in the design of all new structures and in the retrofitting of existing structures. Policy EG-6.1: Design new buildings with the maximum feasible energy efficiency. Implementation Measure EG-6.1(a): The Land Development Code shall require energy efficiency standards which adapt State requirements to the Ukiah Valley for all new development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Building Departments] Policy EG-6. 2: Public buildings shall operate at the highest energy efficiency level economically and operationally feasible. Implementation Measure EG-6.2(a): During the short-term planning period, the City and County shall perform an energy survey on all their buildings and create a plan for accomplishing needed upgrades. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ,~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: General Services and Administration] Implementation Measure EG-6.2(b): New buildings constructed for public agencies shall be to the highest energy efficiency level financially feasible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: General Services and Administration] Policy EG-6. 3: Promote retrofitting of privately-owned buildings to increase energy efficiency. Implementation Measure EG-6.3(a): The City, through its utility agency and other programs to conserve non-renewable energy resources, shall offer incentives to individuals and companies willing to'retrofit their buildings to increase energy efficiency and install more energy efficient appliances. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Electric Utility] 4.06 Energy Suppliers 4.06.01 Summary of major findings Energy suppliers can, through maintenance and system design, increase the efficiency with which they supply energy to their customers. Additionally, oppommities exist for suppliers of energy to work with their customers, offering education and incentive programs, to increase the efficiency of energy use on-site. The primary energy supplies used within buildings are electricity, natural gas, oil, propane and wood. Electrical power is supplied to the planning area by either the City of Ukiah or the Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) Company. The City of Ukiah has owned and operated an electrical distribution system since 1897. It provides electrical service to approximately 7,700 customers, 80 percent of which are residential and the remaining of which are commercial or municipal. The City obtains its electrical supply from various sources as summarized in the Table IV.4-11 and Figure IV.4-O. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.4. Energy 4, Page 7 Table IV.4-11: Ukiah sources of electricity Western Firm Power Allocation 5.9 Western Renewable Allocation 2.9 3ke Mendocino Hydro (City) 3.0 Geothermal 11.0 Combustion Turbine 7.0 Calaveras Hydro 4.0 Electric Power by Source Megawatts NCPA Geothermal 11.C Leke Mendoeino Hydro (City) Western Renewable Allocation 2.6 Total 31.8 ~cPA c.,.v.~.. Ukiah purchases 22.0 MW of power from the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA). NCPA co.,.,.o, ru~,., The City of Ukiah was one of the founding members of NCPA, a joint power agency . comprised of various cities and a rural electric cooperatives which own electric utility systems. The primary purpose of NCPA is to efficiently Figure IV.4-O: Sources of City power supply acquire, purchase, generate, transmit, distribute, sell, interchange and pool electric energy and capacity for its members. Ukiah currently participates in three types of generating resources of NCPA. NCPA operates five combustion turbine units to generate peaking capacity for its members. Four geothermal plants are operated by NCPA. Also, a major hydroelectric project has recently been completed in Calaveras County. NCPA also has an Interconnection Agreement with PG&E to allow NCPA power resources to be delivered over PG&E transmission lines and to purchase supplemental power from PG&E. The City of Ukiah's power resources have been sufficient in the past to meet its loads and, therefore, the City has not needed to purchase supplemental power from PG&E. Electrical energy is delivered to the City of Ukiah over PG&E transmission lines under contracts with Westem and NCPA. The City receives power from PG&E's Ukiah Substation. The City then transmits the power over its own transmission line to its main sub-station located at Orchard and Gobbi Streets. The City's distribution system consists of approximately 50 miles of overhead lines and 25 miles of underground lines. Ukiah's peak demand for electricity occurs during the smnmer months. The peak demand for the summer of 1993 reached 25.7 MW while demand in the winter was approximately 16 MW. The summer peak demand is due to hot weather conditions and air-conditioning loads. In 1993, Ukiah had a total of 7,665 electric customers. Residential customers accounted for 80 percent, small commercial 19 percent and the remaining 1 percent were large commercial and municipal Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah Jllli Mendocino County, California IV.4. Energy ~, Page 8 customers. In terms of electrical load, residential customers accounted for 30 percent, commercial customers 68 percent and the remaining 2 percent are industrial and municipal loads. PG&E serves those electric customers in the Ukiah Valley that are not served by the City of Ukiah. PG&E is one of the nation's largest investor-owned gas and electric utilities. PG&E obtains its electrical supply from widely diversified resources. PG&E owns and operates an electrical distribution system throughout northern and central California, serving 11.8 million people, including facilities within the Ukiah Valley. PG&E electric customers within the planning area include residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural and governmental. The largest individual electrical loads within the planning area are industrial. PG&E also provides natural gas service to portions of the Ukiah Valley. These areas include the City of Ukiah northward to Redwood Valley. PG&E's sources of natural gas are derived from Canada, the U.S. Southwest and California. Natural gas customers include residential, commercial, industrial and governmental. Both Masonite and LP Corporations use natural gas at their wood product plants. Other energy supplies used within buildings include propane, fuel oil and wood. Propane is used by residential and commercial customers in the Ukiah Valley, especially where natural gas service is not available. Fuel oil is used by the Masonite Corporation in combination with wood residue to fuel its steam boilers. Wood is used in the area by some residences for space heating. Both the City of Ukiah and PG&E offer energy conservation programs to their customers. The City of Ukiah through its power service contract is required to have an on-going Conservation and Renewable Energy (CR&E) Program. Ukiah's CR&E Program identifies eight activities. Three of the activities are related to renewable energy "supply" and the other five activities are related to "demand-side" management. The renewable energy supply activities include the City's ownership and operation of a small hydroelectric plant at Lake Mendocino's Coyote Dam. This project has an installed capacity of 3.0 MW. Two other renewable energy supply projects have been initiated in conjunction with NCPA. The city, through NCPA, operates two 110 MW geothermal facilities at "The Geysers." Also, the City is a participant in the NCPA North Fork Stanislaus Project located in Calaveras County. This project is a 205 MW hydroelectric project. Demand-side energy management activities include equipment loans from Western to scan the City's distribution lines, pumping stations and buildings for electrical losses. The City also offers energy management programs to its electric customers. These include energy audits, commercial and residential rebates, and a compact fluorescent bulb rental program. In the Fall of 1992, the U.S. Congress passed the "Energy Policy Act of 1992.' Because of this Act, Ukiah will be required to prepare "Integrated Resource Plan" (IRP). An IRP must include both supply-side and demand side resource assessments, analyze environmental impacts, include public participation, and have action plans with quantifiable energy savings. Customer IRPs are due to Western twelve months from adoption of the f'mal program regulations. The regulations were to be finalized by January, 1996. PG&E is required by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to offer its customers energy management programs. PG&E residential customers are eligible for rebates, educational information and direct assistance. Rebates are offered for ceiling insulation, high-efficiency refrigerators and air conditioners, filters, showerheads, water heater blankets and shade trees. Educational information programs include energy audits, design services and time-of-use rates. Direct assistance is available to income-eligible households for such things as appliance replacements and rate discounts. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program IV.4. Energy 4, Page 9 G PG&E also offers energy management programs to its commercial and industrial customers. Electric and natural gas rebates and other financial incentives are available to customers that undertake efficiency improvements for heating, ventilation and air conditioning, lighting, refrigeration and pumping systems. 4.06.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs GoalEG-7: Educate residents and businesses about the importance of energy efficiency. Policy EG-7.1: Promote energy education programs. Implementation Measure EG-7.1 (a): The City shall utilize its utility bill mailings to promote education on energy efficiency and solar energy. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Electric Utility Department] Implementation Measure EG-7. I(b): The City, in conjunction with other groups, shall participate in or offer workshops, seminars, and newsletters on a periodic basis to provide information to utility users about energy efficiency and solar energy. [7~me- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: Electric Utility Department] ............."' ~',--'-:- '": .... Implementation Measure City, in conjunction with other groups, shall participate in or offer workshops, seminars, and newsletters on a periodic basis to provide information to utility users about energy efficiency and solar energy. [Time- ~rame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure app//es to: City 4, Acjency/De- partment respons/b/e: Electric Utility Department] oal EG-8: Manage existing energy resources to meet increased demands and explore the use of new energy efficient technologies. Policy EG-8.1: Develop a load management program whereby existing electrical supplies can accommodate, to the extent feasible, future growth and development. ZmpZementation Measure EG-8./(a)c Investigate thermal energy storage as a means of reducing peak power demands for cooling. [Time.me for complet/oa: Ongoing plann- ing period 4, Measure app//es to: City 4, A~ency/Departmentrespons/b/e: Electric Utility Department] Implementation Measure EG-8.1 (b): Offer f'mancial or other incentives to residential and com- mercial customers to install more efficient heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; lighting systems; and appliances. IT/me.me for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period 4, Measure appl/es to: CiW 4, A~ency/Department respons/ble: Electric UtiliW Department] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ll Mendocino County ,, Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.I. Airport 4, Page 1 '1 AIRPORT f . Of Introduction HE CITY OF Ukiah owns and operates the 165 acre municipal airport. The airport has been in the same location for the last fifty years, and the City has committed to keeping the airport in this location. To support this, the City has initiated an Airport Master Plan effort using funds from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Since 1986, the City has expanded the Airport Runway Protection Zone, placed an emphasis on commercial and industrial development around the airport, and improved facilities at the airport. There are no scheduled air carriers operating from the airport, although there are significant private and charter aircraft activities, delivery services, and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection attack center. The airport and its operations are given a valued place as a major community resource. The Airport Element spells out the needs of the airport and the surrounding lands in order to ensure a viable airport well into the future. Airports are vital in the modern world. Not only do airports provide passenger service and carry packages and mail, but in rural areas airports also play a critical role in emergency response for fires, air ambulance, and search and rescue. Operations through airports save lives and protect property. Airports are good for business and bring in revenues to a community. Ukiah's quality small community landing field was built in 1942 for the military. The runway was reconstructed to a length of five thousand feet in 1955. There are instrument approaches which permit landings in poor weather. The Ukiah Municipal Airport has on the field a Flight Service Station administered by the Federal Aviation Administration which reports current and forecasted weather, accepts flight plans, and assists in emergency search and rescue operations, all functions vital to the flying public. The current adopted Airport Master Plan was adopted in the early 1970s. The City is in the final steps of adopting a new Plan for the airport. Recent State legislation requires each county have an Airport Land Use Commission in order to provide for appropriate land use around all public use airports in California. Mendocino County established an Airport Land Use Commission in 1993. 1.02 Summary of major findings 1.02.01 Operations There are a number of crucial operations at the airport including the California Department of Forestry for fire protection and aerial support; the Mendocino County Sheriff and other law enforcement agencies base their air equipment at the facility; air ambulance services use the field routinely; and there is also substantial commercial activity from cargo carriers including Federal Express and United Parcel Service. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomh V. 1. Airport 4, Page 2 1.02.01(A) Fire Protection operations The effectiveness of aircraft for fire fighting is well understood. Reinforcement of this belief was demonstrated in 1987 in the Mendenhall fires in Mendocino County and in October 1991 in the Oakland hills. Without tankers and spotters, the devastation and cost in both fires would have been far worse. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection maintains an air attack base in Ukiah. Two air tankers and a spotter plane are stationed at the Ukiah airport during the summer and autumn months. They provide an immediate response in case of brush or structure fire in the area. On average, CDF fights over 200 fires each year from this base. CDF also provides some $90,000 in annual revenues to the City due to its presence. The Department contracts with a private pilot to function as a cooperative spotter making flights from the Ukiah Airport over surrounding areas to watch for fires. Positive sightings are relayed back to CDF for fire fighting action. 1.02.01(B) Emergency Services Medical flights are routinely conducted to and from Ukiah by fixed wing aircraft and by helicopter. The helicopters generally travel directly to the hospital but often take on fuel at the airport. There are about 75 such flights each year. Additionally, airplanes routinely deliver medical supplies, blood and plasma for use in hospitals. The Mendocino County Sheriff's Air Squadron has responsibility for nearly four thousand square miles of territory. The squadron serves the public by searching for downed aircraft, lost hikers, and victims of accident or crime. At least two training missions and about six actual search and rescue operations are conducted each year from the airport, using ten aircraft. 1.02.01(C) Law enforcement and public service Air patrols search for marijuana gardens and are used for highway traffic surveillance. Pacific Gas & Electric Company's patrol plane, which checks for gas leaks, routinely uses the airport. The FAA Flight Service Station briefs pilots, takes weather observations, accepts flight plans, and participates in search operations for lost or missing aircraft. The California Air Resources Board contracts with local pilots to perform air quality monitoring flights during burn seasons. 1.02.01(D) Commercial Operations Commercial activity important to the entire community occurs at the airport. United Parcel Service flies in three times each business day to deliver and take out packages. Federal Express has two flights each day as does Ameriflight, another air package service. In addition to packages and important papers, bank checks, property title reports, films for processing, blood, and government documents are all flown in and out of the Ukiah airport. As a whole, commercial companies have more than 1,800 flights each year of service into or from the Ukiah airport. While actual corporate revenues are not made public, it is estimated that over half a million dollars is generated by these three businesses. I Federal Express Corporation is totally dependent on the airport since all of its three thousand packages per week come in and go out by air. The local office employs sixteen people, and without the airport, these jobs would not exist. Other corporate activity is also dependent upon the airport. Louisiana Pacific flies its jet in several times weekly and Retech Corporation hangars a twin engine airplane. Revenues to these companies are increased by their efficient use of airplanes. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and Georgia Pacific Corporation all fly their airplanes to Ukiah regularly. There are four ~Ukiah Airport Manager Don Bua and Growth Management Steering Committee member/Airport Citizen Advisory Committee liaison Rudy Light, 1991. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V. 1. 'Airport 4, Page 3 charter services to carry passengers around. There is one aerial spray operation, critical to agricultural industries, including the pear and grape growers. The Santa Rosa Airporter bus service uses the airport as a pickup and drop off point for its four times daily service to San Francisco International Airport. Hertz and Thrifty rental car companies maintain franchised offices at the airport. Both operations bring in direct sales tax and license revenues to the City. A less tangible but no less important benefit is the role the airport plays in attracting business to locate here. The airport gives the Ukiah valley a competitive edge over many cities. It is also the key to the development of the Airport Industrial Park located adjacent to the airport. As it develops with industry, the tax base is increased and jobs are created. The airport is important to many businesses and is a factor in their locating where they do. 1.02.01(E) Pilots and Planes The needs of the business and recreational pilots are met. About one hundred planes are based here, and the hangar fees alone bring in $107,000 to the city each year. Flight instruction is given by five operators. 1.02.02 Community Role of Airport 1.02.02(A) Fiscal Impact of the Airport There are 48 jobs currently on the airport property with a payroll approaching $700,000. In addition to these, there are about one hundred jobs generated indirectly by the airport's presence. The airport has the potential of attracting business, especially with the offering of a nearby industrial park. The budget for the airport is over four hundred thousand dollars. Revenues are generated from fuel sales ($250,000), hangar rents ($107,000), the Federal Aviation Administration ($14,000), ground rent to businesses ($19,000) and smaller amounts from other sources.2 Airport revenues can increase in the future by providing more hangars. Land is currently rented to a nursery and to a construction firrn and there is still some space available in the airport for further rentals and increased revenues. f. O2.02(B) Recreation and community activities Each year the three area Lions Clubs sponsor the Ukiah Air Show. In 1991 over eight thousand people attended and more than twenty thousand dollars was raised for charitable purposes. This event is by far the most popular and well-attended single event of the year in this community. The Air Show draws people from throughout northern California, including Humboldt, Lake and Sonoma Counties. 2City of Ukiah budget, Fiscal Year 1992, Account 600. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi-t V. 1. Airport 4, Page 4 1.o2.o2(c) Safety Safety is an issue at airports because a crash event can be catastrophic. Over the last decade there have only been four accidents in the vicinity, and none with serious property damage or loss of life to peo- ple on the ground. Three did result in pilot deaths. There has never been a mid-air collision in Ukiah. Aviation accidents do occur. One national study demonstrated that fifty percent of accidents occur on the airport property or below the traffic pattern. The occurrences took place on the inbound or outbound tracks within forty-five degrees off the centerline of the runway. Nearly two-thirds of all accidents occur within one mile of the airport. Gen- erally, accidents occur along the extended runway (the imaginary line along the center of the runway away from the airport) or below the traffic pattern itself. It is very rare to have an accident along side a runway. This is one reason why it is critical that the airport have a zone of safety extending from the ends of the runways and below the volume of space where the airplanes actually travel. The FAA is continually updating its standards to ensure the safety of people and property on the ground as well as to provide safe approaches and departures for aircraft. At the Ukiah airport, twin engine planes fly in literally everyday, and jets come in about one hundred times each year. For each runway, there are two areas to be considered off both ends of the runway. The first is an Object Free Area (OFA). This area is to have no structures on it (except those dedicated for the safe operation of aircraft). The second is a Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). The sizes of the OFA and the RPZ are determined by the size and speed of aircraft using the airport and by the presence or absence of instrument approaches. The actual traffic patterns flown are to the east of the airport, except for instrument approaches which are generally conducted from the north, coming in aligned with Runway 153 and passing just east of State Street near Gobbi Street and onto the runway. Local ordinance requires a turn to the east shortly after takeoff (at an altitude of fifty feet and before the end of the pavement) to avoid either the downtown area with a northbound departure or a group of commercial and residential areas with a southbound departure. Typically, a plane departing Runway 33 to the north will climb aligned with the runway to an altitude of two hundred to four hundred feet and will turn to the east near Talmage Road while still climbing. Once beyond Highway 101, the pilot will be perhaps six to eight hundred feet above the ground and will turn to the desired course. A similar procedure is conducted southbound except there is a twenty degree turn to the left, which turns the aircraft easterly. The FAA Airport Design recommends that strict land use controls be enacted in the RPZ and below the approach zone. With respect to the RPZ, the document states, ~Land uses should be prohibited which might create glare and misleading lights or lead to the construction of residences, fuel handling and storage facilities, smoke generating activities, and 3Airport runways are numbered with the degrees from north. Runway "15' means 150 degrees from north; Runway 33 means 330 degrees. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V. 1. Airport ~, Page 5 places of public assembly. Churches, schools, office buildings, shopping centers, and stadiums typify places of public assembly. "While it is desirable to clear all objects from the RPZ, uses such as agHcultural operations, provided they do not attract birds, and golf courses are normally acceptable outside the object free area. Automobile parking, although discouraged, may be permitted provided it is located outside of the runway object free area and below the approach surface. ,n The FAA acknowledges that some airports are like Ukiah's and that all traffic may be routed to one side of the runway. In recognition of this it says, "Where this turn has been formally established by the airport and FAA, the height restrictions should be applied along the actual turn path as well as along the extended runway centerline. ,5 The State of California also has established some guidelines to ensure public safety. An "Inner Safety Zone" has been designated; it is identical to the federal RPZ and in it no structures are permitted within it. The Inner Safety Zone (ISZ) is marked on Figure V. 1-P on page 10 with a pattern of right angles ("L" shapes) since it corresponds with the RPZ boundary. Beyond this is an "Outer Safety Zone" (OSZ) which extends 3,500 feet for twin engine aircraft and 5,000 feet beyond the runway for jet aircraft. Criteria for the Outer Safety Zone are basically defined as minimal low density development. The Outer Safety Zone is noted on Figure V. 1-P on page 10 in a dashed pattern. To the north, the Outer Safety Zone extends to about one hundred feet north of Gobbi Street. According to these state guidelines, the Inner and Outer Safety Zones can be expanded laterally by local requirements and modified by actual traffic patterns. The more stringent requirement for corporate jets may not fully apply since only about two per week use the airport and thus the line is not shown for jets. Clearly, the City of Ukiah cannot possibly meet these guidelines for the Inner and Outer Safety Zones. Most of the land capable of being developed in these zones is already built upon. However, as mentioned before, there is a local ordinance which stipulates that pilots depart to the northeast or southeast from Runway 33 or Runway 15 respectively to avoid more populated areas. This has worked well over the years to ensure aircraft avoid the downtown areas and those areas most built up. The actual track of a flight depends on the type of plane and pilot technique. In any event, nearly all departing traffic quickly passes east of the railroad tracks. 1.02.03 Airport opportunities 1.02.03(A) Long term issues and opportunities The Ukiah Airport is facing a challenge that is common across the United States. Survival of airports across the country is threatened by pressure from nearby development. Approximately twenty airports close down each year or are forced, usually unwillingly, to relocate (Refer to the examples in Explanation V. 1-VI on page 7). One reason for this pressure on airport facilities is that airport land can be of great development value. The facility grounds and adjoining areas are normally flat. There is invariably good transportation to and from the airport so people like to settle nearby. There is a legitimate land use conflict among competing users, whether residential, commercial, industrial or aviation. As development occurs near an airport and the density of development increases, nAirport design, page 13. ~Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, 1983, Page 114. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Californt', V. 1. Airport e Page 6 citizens become alarmed because of perceived safety issues and irritated due to noise. When the density of development reaches a certain point, inevitably the citizens call for curtailment of operations or outright closure of the airport. There has been discussion in the community suggesting that the present airport close and a new one be built southeast of Ukiah. Relocation of the airport is not advisable due to economic and safety considerations. The cost of planning, engineering, preparing environmental documents, and permitting an airport in the 1990s is substantial. The physical plant would be extraordinarily expensive. About 200 acres of land would have to be purchased at an approximate cost of $1 million. To construct a runway of suitable length and width and accessory taxiway all with the requisite strength would require at least fifteen to twenty million dollars. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V. 1. Airport ,~ Page 7 ......... ~',.;..ny ...... ..... *~:~1 ~.~:1~: ........ 1.1 ~t~1 ~ll~ ll~ ~ ~lll~l~ When the City approved a master plan for the Airport Industrial Park, located east of the airport between Highway 101 and the railroad tracks, a conceptual extension of Airport Park Boulevard to Norgard Lane was shown. No engineering design or plans h_ave ever been prepared for this extension. Should this be developed, the location of the road must be designed to ensure that it will not interfere with any state or federal regulations pertaining to airport operations. It is important to protect the full use of the proposed extension of the runway to the south. The Ukiah airport needs the security of knowing that development around it and in its area of influence will be compatible with its operations and will not jeopardize its future. Once an airport is lost, there is no getting it back. It is far easier for a school, a residential subdivision, a commercial development or any other use involving dense public assembly, to find a new location than it is to move an airport. The three major concerns of land use planning around an airport are as follows, summarized from the above findings: protection of the airspace to ensure safe flight operations; minimizing hazards on the Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah i~ Mendocino County, Califomi? V. 1. Airport 4, Page 8 ground in the event of a crash; and noise considerations (Division of Aeronautics, 1983). Given these factors, we see there is one all important feature, and that is density of development. Density of use is the key to compatibility of land use near an airport. This overrides other factors such as noise generation from other sources, traffic congestion, degree of industrialization, safety and the like. Dense residential and commercial development are not suitable to be located close to an airport. Less dense development such as industrial and limited commercial will not only coexist with the airport, but each will enhance the other's function. The State of California has published guidelines for acceptable densities in and around airports, the RPZ or Inner Safety Zone, and the Outer Safety ~Zone. For the Inner Safety Zone, no structures should be allowed, and a maximum allowed density at any time is 10 people per acre. In the Outer Safety Zone, there should be no more than 150 people in a building and no more than 25 people per acre. For land use not in structures, the maximum recommended limit is 50 people per acre. In order to ensure the airport's long term community value, land use planning must be specific to the airport area. This planning may involve some restrictions to the use of the surrounding land for three reasons. Hodges and Schutt (1991) cite three, similar to those mentioned in the Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (Division of Aeronautics, 1983). The first is to avoid situations conducive to accidents, so there are height restrictions and required amounts of object free ground near the ends of runways. The second is for the protection of property and people on the ground, so control is put on the land use to limit density of people and buildings. The issues to be weighed are both the probability of an accident and the potential damage even if the probability of accident is very low. Finally, the land use is controlled so as to help the aircraft occupants survive a crash. Small airplanes have been successfully landed on an area as small as a football field. 1.02.03(B) Dual Jurisdiction of Land Use An issue facing the Ukiah airport is the,fact that it is owned by the City of Ukiah but is only partly surrounded by land under the city's jurisdiction. The land to the southwest, south and east (once past Airport Industrial Park and Highway 101) is all in the County. Regulations, ordinances and zoning differ to some extent so the land use in the airport's area of influence cannot be adequately planned for at this time without County cooperation. There is a need for common development standards between the City and County zoning codes in the airport area. 1.02.03(C) Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission California counties are required to appoint an Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) to formulate a comprehensive plan for airports called an Airport Land Use Plan. The goal of this plan is to ensure that development in and around an airport is compatible with airport operations and that the public is protected Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V. 1. Airport ~1, Page 9 from airport noise and crash hazards. The ALUC may include building height restrictions, allowable land uses, and determine building standards within the planning area of the airport. The relationship between the Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission and the City of Ukiah is established in State law. The Commission, although funded by the County, is an independent board consisting of seven members (two from cities, two from the County, two persons with aviation expertise, and one member of the general public). Within the parameters established in state law, the decisions of the Commission are final. The Airport Land Use Plan is intended to provide guidance to the ALUC when it reviews land use plans and zoning regulations from cities and counties under its jurisdiction. The Commission has no authority over legally existing uses and no involvement with the operations of any airport. The Commission has review authority over new land uses within the airport area and the expansion of existing uses. The City of Ukiah was awarded a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration in 1993 for the preparation of an Airport Land Use Plan. The Plan -- completed by the City but not adopted as of the date of General Plan adoption -- will be presented to the ALUC for its review. Until the land use plan is adopted, the ALUC has the authority to review projects within two miles of the airport -- unless the Commission designates a differently sized area. The process for review, appeal, and recommendation are established in State law. While the ALUC has substantial review authority, there are procedures by which the City could modify or change a Commission action. G f .03 oal AE-I: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Promote the Ukiah City Airport for the community's benefit both now and in the future. Policy AE-I.I: Recognize that the airport's vitality and growth help achieve the General Plan Vision. Implementation Measure AE-I.1 (a): Ensure that the airport is a part of the City's promotional efforts for economic development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · , Measure applies to: City ~t, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Airport Department] Goal AE-2: Provide for long-term viability of the airport. Policy AE-2.1: Define the long-term growth boundaries for the airport. Implementation Measure AE-2.1 (a): Prior to the conclusion of the short-term planning period, identify parcels that may be of benefit to the airport, and encourage annexation ac- tions to add the airport-realted identified territories to the City's municipal limits. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning pedod ~ Measure applies to: City ~, Agen- cy/Department responsible: City Council] Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, Califomi,~ V. 1. Airport ,I, Page 10 I l Object Free Area Zones ~R~ay Protection ~Outer Safety Overlay .... t I I I I I I I l l I I l I I I t IIIIIIlll~l~ Figure V. l-P: Location of airport combining zones for the Airport Land Use Plan Goal AE-3: Establish uniform ordinances and regulations for land use in the airport's core and peripheral overlay zones. Policy AE-3.1: Work with the County to develop a similar or duplicate implementing code for development in and around the airport. Implementation Measure AE-3.1 (a): The Ukiah City Council shall adopt -- and the Mendo- cino County Board of Supervisors shall be encouraged to adopt -- zoning Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V. 1. 'Airport 4, Page 11 ordinances in conformance with the Airport Land Use Plan which provide for identical classifications and uses in the same zones in those areas around the airport in the Core and Peripheral Overlays as shown in Figure V. 1-P on page 10. [Time- frame for completion: Following adoption of the Airport Land Use plan in the short-term plann- ing period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department] Policy AE-3.2: Promote acceptable land uses for both city and county zones in the core and peripheral zone areas. Implementation Measure AE-3.2(a): Adopt an ordinance creating an Airport Overlay Zone consisting of the Core Overlay and Peripheral Overlay in conformance with the Airport Land Use Planfi [Timeframe for completion: Following adoption of the Airport Land Use Plan in the short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: Planning Department] Goal AE.-4: Policy AE-4.1: Promote a "good neighbor policy" by the airport and its users. Develop a Noise Control program Implementation Measure AE-4.1(a): The City Airport Manager, with the assistance of the Airport Commission and interested members of the aviation community, shall develop a noise control plan. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Airport Department] Implementation Measure AE-4.1(b): During the short-term planning period, a written plan for reducing noise impacts shall be prepared and presented for adoption. [timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Airport Department] Policy AE-4.2: Identify common noise levels in and around the airport to identify "airport-specific" noise. Implementation Measure AE-4.2(a): The City of Ukiah shall identify common noise levels around Ukiah, both near the airport and away from it, to determine the impact of the noise associated with aircraft operations on the community. Implementation Measure AE-4.2(b): Ensure that regulations or noise reduction programs do not interfere with or reduce the effectiveness of the aerial tankers and other fire- fighting aircraft using the Ukiah Airport. 6Core zones would restrict the types and densities of land uses within this overlay zone. The uses and restrictions would be enumerated in the land development code. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County 2 PARKS AND RECREATION Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation ,e Page ! 2.01 2.01.01 Existing parks and recreation facilities Summary of major findings WIDE RANGE of parks and Area. Federal recreation Russian River, Mendo- cino College, and Fair- grounds provide recrea- tional opportunities for residents and visitors. A bicycle route system also exists in parts of the area which connects to most of these recreational facilities. recreational facilities and services exists in the Ukiah Planning areas, County parks, City parks and other facilities such as the Table V.2-12: Park facilities and acreage Lake Mendocino 5110 Cow Mountain 600 Parks are divided into two basic categories: passive and active. Passive parks are those that are designed for generally "subdued" activities, such as walking, reading, and family picnics. Active parks are designed for activities involving groups at play, facilities such as pools, athletic events, or playing field activities. The City has provisions for the dedication of park land or payment of fees in lieu of dedication for new developments. The County has no such requirement for park land dedication or fees. Thus, recent housing occurring in the unincorporated portions of the Planning Area may lack community and neighborhood parks designed to serve the new residents. Continued growth in these unincorporated areas, without park requirements, will place even greater demands upon those park and recreational facilities and activities offered by the City of Ukiah. Mill Creek 60 Low Gap* 80 Todd Grove Anton Stadium Carpenter Park* Civic Center Softball Complex Riverside Park Golf Course McGarvey Park Oak Manor Park Nokomis School Vinewood 16 12 4 7 11 39 87 1 5 1 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 2 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi'~ ! LAKE MENDOCINO (Lake and adjoh~$ l~d! COW MOUN~A1~ MILL CREEK PARK Figure V.2-Q: County and Federal park and recreation lands Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 3 2.Of. Of(A) Federal Recreation Areas There are two Federal recreation areas within the Planning Area: Lake Mendocino and Cow Mountain. A Federal Recreation Area is a regional park. They are intended to attract people who live in the Ukiah Valley, as well as people from throughout the region who travel to the area for day or overnight use, including the San Francisco-Oakland metropolitan area and the North Bay counties. Lake Mendocino occupies 5,110 acres of land in the northeastern portion of the Planning Area and offers a multi-purpose reservoir, day-use, and overnight campground facilities operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The lake's normal surface area covers 1,690 acres. Some of the Cow Mountain Recreation Area borders the eastern boundary of the Planning Area. Approximately six hundred acres of the total 60,000-acre recreation area lie within the Planning Area. Mill Creek Road provides access from Ukiah to the recreation area. The entire Federally-managed recre- ation area is located between Ukiah and Lakeport in the Mayacamas Mountains. Cow Mountain offers "back country" recreation such as hiking and horseback trails, hunting, camping, and off highway vehicle (OHV) use. The recreation area is managed by the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 2.01.01(B) County recreation areas There are two parks within the Planning Area managed by the County of Mendocino: Mill Creek and Low Gap. Mill Creek County Park is located on the eastern boundary of the Planning Area adjacent to Cow Mountain Recreation Area. It is accessible via Mill Creek Road. The recreation area occupies 400 acres of land, of which approximately 60 acres are within the Planning Area. Mill Creek Park has two reservoirs for swimming and fishing, hiking trails, picnic areas, and an equestrian trail. The second County park within the Planning Area is Low Gap Regional Park. This park is located on Low Gap Road west of the County Governmental Complex. The park occupies eighty acres of land, all of which lie within the city limits of Ukiah. Facilities at the park include softball fields, horseshoe pits, a volley ball court, archery ranges, tennis courts, "' playground equipment, a Frisbee course, a parcourse, and an amphitheater. 2.01.01(C) Mendocino Community College Mendocino College is located within the northwestern portion of the - Planning Area. The College has a variety of recreational facilities, some of which are available for public use. Public facilities include an all-weather track, six tennis courts, and two outdoor volleyball courts -- one sand and one grass. The College also has a gym which is used by organized basketball leagues. ~ ~ _~_~o~ ~ ~.~/ 2.Of. Of(D) Twelfth District Fairgrounds limits of Ukiah. Thc Fairgrounds occupy approximately fifty acres of land.. Parr of thc Fairgrounds is within thc City limits and thc remainder is with~ thc Figure V.2-R: f2 unincorporated County. Recreational facilities at thc Fairgrounds include a golf District driving range, horseshoe pits, car race track, and arena. The many buildings Fairgrounds at the Fairgrounds also provide space for educational and social events. The horseshoe pits are operated by the local Horseshoe Club. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation ~, Page 4 City of Ukiah ~1, Mendocino County, California, 2.01.01(E) The Russian River The Russian River traverses the Planning Area from north to south. The river provides various recre- ational opportunities such as swimming, fishing, inner tubing, and picnicking. There are four public access points to the river near the City of Ukiah: The City's Softball Complex in the northeast portion of the City, the Vichy Springs/Perkins Road crossing, at the end of Gobbi Street in Riverside Park, and the Talmage Road crossing. These access points, except for the softball complex, lack improved facilities such as paved parking or restroom facilities. ZOl. Ol(F) City of Ukiah parks and recreation. The City of Ukiah provides a variety of parks and recre- ational facilities and programs to its residents and visitors. There are neighborhood parks, a museum, the Civic Center, athletic fields, and community parks. Figure V. 2-S: Russian River access points and river-area parks Neighborhood parks are intended to serve the basic play and recreation needs of people living within a City neighborhood. McGarvey Park is located just north of the Civic Center. It is a passive park of a little less than one acre. Oak Manor Park serves the Oak Manor neighborhood, which is the only neighborhood park within the city limits located east of Highway 101. The park site is 4.76 acres and offers playground equipment, picnic areas and two tennis courts. Nokomis School Park is adjacent to the Nokomis School in southwestern Ukiah. It is approximately 1.3 acres in size and has two tennis courts. Vinewood Park is located in northern Ukiah and has 4.7 acres with playground equipment, basketball hoops, picnic areas and restrooms. Community parks are major facilities designed to meet active recreation needs for residents of the City as a whole. Todd Grove is located in the northwestern portion of Ukiah. It is 16.17 acres in size and offers two swimming pools, group and individual picnic areas, a playground, and restrooms. Todd Grove has the only public swimming pools in Ukiah. Riverside Park has only seven developed acres within its forty acres of total land area. Its proposed future uses are discussed later in the Element. There is a BMX (bicycle "moto-cross') track and three Little League fields. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County I McOmrvey Park. t Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation ~, ?age 5 II II II # # FAIRC.~OUIVZ~ % Figure V. 2-T: City of Ukiah's Neighborhood Parks Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation ~, Page 6 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, Califomi= Anton Stadium is a community park located just southwest of Todd Grove Park on approximately twelve acres. It is comprised of three facilities: Giorno Park, a ' passive park; The Lion's Club Little League ball field; and a minor league-style baseball stadium with concession stand, and a girl's softball facility. Three facilities located on Main Street in central Ukiah include: Carpenter Park, a passive park; Grace Hudson Mu- seum; and a house museum known as the "Sun House," a registered State Historic Landmark. Combined, these facilities cover 3.89 acres. The Ukiah Civic Center is [~ ~ located downtown on Seminary Figure V.2-U: City park and recreation facilities in the Todd Avenue two blocks west of State Grove~Golf course area Street. The 7.44-acre Civic Center houses the City governmental offices and provides land for passive recreation activities. The City's Softball Complex is located in the northeastern portion of Ukiah adjacent to the Russian River. It occupies an eleven-acre site leased to the Ukiah Men's Softball Association. The facility has two lighted softball fields and includes restrooms and a concession stand. A third softball field has been planned since 1983. Ukiah Municipal Golf Course is located in the northwestern portion of the City. The course comprises 87.11 acres with an eighteen hole course. 2. Of. Of(G) School sites as play areas The various school sites within the City also serve as park and recreational facilities for residents. The schools have playgrounds and playfields. Some of the recreational programs offered by the City are conducted within the school buildings. In the future, with the conversion of many area schools to year- round facilities, schools may affect the availability for recreation use. 2.01.01(H) Bicycle routes A system of bike routes is a part of the 1992 Update to the Regional Transportation Plan as adopted by the Mendocino County Council of Governments (MCOG). Some marked bike lanes consist of painted stripes adjoining or within the paved sections of the roadway. Other routes do not have improvements or identification. The bike route system connects most park and school facilities. Bicycle routes and needed programs are discussed in the last section of this Element. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.21 Parks and Recreation 4, Page 7 2.01.01(1) City recreation activities and demand The City of Ukiah offers the citizens of the Valley many recreational programs. Recreation classes and athletic programs are offered all year long. As the number of programs and participants increases, the demands on existing facilities increase and in some cases exceed existing capacity. limited to a half court. Basketball The 1992-93 basketball season experienced severe facility shortages. The youth program expanded by approximately sixty percent over prior years to include more than six hundred children and young adults. Nearly 60 youths were turned away during the 1992-93 season as there was no possible way to f'md more practice or game times. Teams rep- resented elementary, junior high, and high school students with ten to thirteen players per team. Utilizing Frank Zeek, Oak Manor, Nokomis, Yokayo, Redwood Valley Middle School, Hopland, Pomolita Middle School and Ukiah High School for practice, each team had one 45- minute practice session per week The practice space and times limited involvement and instruction to covering only basic skills. Games could not be scheduled in some school facilities because the basketball courts were too small for safe, competitive games. In the schools where games were played, schedules started at seven on Saturday morning and did not conclude until after eight o'clock in the evening. The City-sponsored Men's Basketball League involved 230 men on twenty-five teams. Play was limited to the Pomolita Middle School facility and the gym at Mendocino Community College. There are also five high school basketball teams, four Pomolita Middle School teams (proposed to increase to six to accommodate school demand), and four teams at Redwood Valley Middle School (which although outside the Planning Area, provide facilities for area residents) and five Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) teams. These teams have priority at the gyms at their schools for practice and competitive games. Basketball involvement at all levels in 1992-93 resulted in a need for facilities for just under 1,100 players. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ M®ndocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 9 Volleyball The City sponsors a co-education Volleyball league which involves more than two hundred players on over twenty teams during the 1992-93 season. League facilities are limited to the Yokayo School. All other schools with gyms have facilities too small for adult volleyball. Although there is an adequately-sized facility at Pomolita Middle School, it is in use during the season by the school's volleyball and basketball teams. Lack of courts is limiting the potential for expanding the league. Church and private indoor facilities Although some of the church groups in the area also have basketball facilities, they are generally not available for City-organized activities. Private and quasi-public organizations are generally unwilling to commit facilities to public recreation activities because of the inability for flexibility in scheduling once the season's games are underway. Occasional use for practice or single-event activities may be informally scheduled at such a facility by a church member who is also a coach or participant in a City-sponsored activity. However, regular dependence on these facilities is not a likely solution to the problem of finding indoor activity sites. Although the 12th District County Fairgrounds offers large facilities and meeting rooms, its rental cost has generally been prohibitive for most community-oriented activities. Recreation classes The City's Community Services Department offers a wide range of recreational classes as well as organized sports. These programs include aerobics, dance, arts and crafts, home skills, yoga, music, poetry, tennis, golf, and basketball, in addition to other activities. While the City would like to offer more classes the lack of suitable facilities limits them. Ukiah High School has been the primary location for classes. Budget cuts in custodial and other services has reduced the number of classrooms that are available for community use. The need for a new indoor recreation facility is discussed later in the Element. 2.02 Valley. wide park and recreation issues 2.02.01 Summary of major findings goweSidents of the Ukiah Valley -- encompassing the entire Planning Area, and populated areas utside of the Planning Area in Redwood and Potter Valleys -- all utilize recreation facilities ithin the City of Ukiah. Over the life of the General Plan, the population of the Valley outside the City limits will likely be greater than the population within the City limits. To share the limited financial and staff resources and meet increasing demand for park and recreation facilities, the City and County need to examine the potential of shepherding the creation of a park and recreation district. The district formation could be an independent, district with its own Board of Directors, a dependent district with the Board of Supervisors and City Council sharing management duties through a joint powers agreement, or a special district, such as a County Service Area or Municipal Improvement District. Formation of the District requires approval by the Local Agency Formation Commission and a simple majority of those voting. Most funding mechanisms would require a two-thirds voter approval. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, CalifomL- V.2. Parks and Recreation ~, ?age 10 The major aspect of any continued regional services in parks and recreation is the amount of discretionary funds that the City and County area able to allocate from General Fund budgets. In many communities, it is only when the voters provide for special i~i~..:..~..:,.i~$i: I ............................. funding sources that parks and recreation facilities can keep pace with population growth and service demands. 2.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, ~ Gal PR-l: Work to form an entity to provideI~i~'"'!i i~i ~t~~~l~~~i!iiii!i!iiiiiilI ........ a City-County public entity for parks and recreation. Implementation Measure PR-I.1 (a): During the short-term planning period, either (1) allocate funding or (2) ask LAFCo to initiate a study for the formation of a public entity that will serve the Planning Area and to-be-defined population areas with parks and recreation services. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ,t, Measure applies to: City and County ~I, Agency/Department responsible: City Parks and Recreation, County Administration] 2.03 Park security and maintenance 2.03.01 Summary of major findings There is a need to ensure maintenance and security of all parks and recreational facilities. The City of Ukiah has a responsibility to its residents to ensure that all parks and recreation facilities are kept safe, in proper repair and under proper security at all times. Property owners adjacent to parks and recreational facilities have the right to expect the City to ensure the safety of their property and improvements from those who use the Ukiah City facilities. The costs of park security and maintenance need to be shared between agencies or the work tends to be deferred. 2.03.02 Goal PR-2: Policy PR-2.1 i' General Plan goals, policies and implementing programs Establish a comprehensive maintenance and security program for all recrea- tional facilities, parkland, and trails in the Ukiah area. Establish a program to share maintenance costs in community parks with the County of Mendocino. Implementation Measure PR-2. I(a): The City shall enter into an agreement as appropriate to share maintenance and security with the County of Mendocino. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Short-term planning period ~I, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Community Services and Public Safety, County Administration and Sheriff] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation ~, Page 11 Policy PR-2.2: Promote the formulation of a City-County agreement for park operations and maintenance. Implementation Measure PR-2.2(a): The City and County shall work together to develop, maintain, and secure all park and recreation facilities, both inside and outside the City limits of Ukiah. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ~ Measure ap- plies to: City and County e Agency/Department responsible: City Community Services and Public Safety, County Administration and Sheriff] Policy PR-2.3: Ensure that all of the facilities and parks are kept in proper repair to lessen the liability and increase their use and enjoyment by residents. Implementation Measure PR-2.3(a): The City shall ensure that the annual budget includes funds for proper ongoing and preventive maintenance. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Community Services] Policy PR-2.4: Ensure that all of the Planning Area recreation facilities and parks are patrolled and secure from crime and misuse. Implementation Measure PR-2.4(a): Establish a program to maintain and secure public park and recreation properties. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Mea- sure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-2.4(b): The park and recreation security program shall include protection of adjoining property owners from activities and actions that take place at park and recreation facilities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-2.4(c): During the short-term planning period, provide for a joint-powers agreement for the police department or a properly deputized private security firm to patrol area parks and recreation facilities. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Community Services, County Administration or Sheriff] 2.04 South of Washington Street 2.04.01 Summary of major findings Flamilies living south of Washington Street need and deserve the same availability to neighborhood park and recreational facilities as residents living elsewhere in the Planning Area. There are few developed parks or recreation facilities south of Washington Street in the City or urbanized unincorporated area south of Washington Street. As more schools go to a year-round schedule, playgrounds can no longer be realistically considered accessible "parkland" for children's play. As the number of homes with two working parents or a single parent increases, so does the number of children who need a place for sheltered and supervised recreation and play. In addition, the number of multiple family residences in this area results in a large concentration of children in need of areas for safe play and recreation. Currently, the children residing south of Washington Street must walk or ride bicycles many blocks to reach parks and play areas. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah · Mendocino County, California V.2. Parks and Recreation ~, Page 12 In order to serve the needs of families and (Figure V.2-X), a "needs assessment" must be prepared. This assessment is a systematic approach to examining which families will be using a proposed park, the land area available for development, existing and anticipated revenues, and other related factors. The assessment can be used to develop a park facility suited to the neighborhood. The types of facilities or activities that should be considered in the South of Washington Neighborhood include a sheltered play area with protection from the elements; playground equipment; grassy fields for running and playing active games; and basketball equipment. This list is by no means all-inclusive, but merely represents a small part of the broad spectrum of facilities that are not present in the neighborhood. children in the South of Washington Street neighborhood 2.04.02 Goal PR-3: Policy PR-3.1: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Develop parks and rec- reation facilities in the area south of Washing- ton Street. Establish new neighbor- Figure V. 2-X: "South of Washington" hood parks and recre- neighborhood as used in the General Plan ation facilities in the area south of Washington Street to serve the needs of residents. Implementation Measure PR-3.1 (a): The parks south of Washington Street shall be designed to serve a wide variety of children's play and recreation opportunities, based on the size of the site and the results of a "needs assessment" prepared prior to f'malizing park plans. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~I, Measure applies to: City ~ Agency/Departmentresponsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-3. I(b): The City and County shall work together to identify suitable properties for acquisition for parks and recreation facilities south of the Washington Street area. [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period ~, Mea- sure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Community Services, County Administration] Implementation Measure PR-3. I (c): The City and County shall seek sources of funding for the purchase of the selected park property. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, ?age 13 period 4, Measure applies to: Cityand County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-3.1 (d): The City ~ Cotmty shall develop the lands south of Washington as parks within five years of acquisition. [Timaframe for completion: Short-term to intermediate-term planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City ~ Coun~ 4, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services,:C0u~ Administrati0n] Policy PR-3.2: Develop a City-County program to collect in-lieu fees to supplement capital facility budgets for the south of Washington street area neighborhood park and recreational facilities. Implementation Measure PR-3.2(a): The City and County shall place in-lieu fees collected from new development in the South of Washington Street area into a park develop- ment trust fund. This fund is to be used expressly in conjunction with other capital funds for property acquisition and development of parks in the south of Washington Street area. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City General Services and Planning Department, County Administration and Planning and Building Department] 2.05 Orr Creek-Wagonseller Neighborhood Park 2.05.01 Summary of major findings Developing a park in this neighborhood needs to follow the same system used in assessing park needs for the south of Washington park discussed earlier in the Element. Community involvement in The area north of the Orchard Plaza with residential development along Clara and Ford Streets is in need of a neighborhood park. Children are generally able to play in undeveloped fields in the area. With numerous townhomes and individual homes in the area, there needs to be an organized public park to serve the area without fear of losing the "perceived park" on undeveloped land to future ~_~i~" i/~u~; tt development. the process will ensure the selection of an appropriate location. Park facilities may need to meet more than just the neighborhood's recreation needs, although it is not necessary to have a park designed to the full standards of regional or city- wide facilities. 2.05.02 General Plan goals, G policies, and implementing programs oal PR--t: Develop parks and recreation facilities in the Orr Creek-Wagonseller neighborhood. Policy PR-4.1: Establish new neighborhood parks and recreation facilities in the Orr Creek- Wagonseller neighborhood area to serve the needs of residents. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califomia_ V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 14 Implementation Measure PR-4.1 (a): The parks shall be designed to serve a wide variety of children's play and recreation opportunities, based on the size of the site and the results of a "needs assessment" prepared prior to finalizing park plans. [7'imoframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-4.1 (b): The City of Ukiah shall work with area residents to identify suitable properties for acquisition for parks and recreation facilities for the Orr Creek-Wagonseller neighborhood. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-4.1 (c): The City shall identify methods to acquire the selected park property for the neighborhood. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term to intermediate-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentre- sponsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-4.1(d): The City shall develop the lands in the Orr Creek-Wagon- seller neighborhood as parks within the five years following acquisition. [Time- frame for completion: Short-term to intermediate-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Community Services] Policy PR-4. 2: Develop a City program to collect in-lieu fees to supplement capital facility budgets for the Orr Creek-Wagonseller neighborhood park and recreational facilities. Implementation Measure PR-4.2(a): The City shall place in-lieu fees collected from new development in the Orr Creek-Wagonseller area into a park development trust fund. This fund is to be used expressly in conjunction with other capital funds for property acquisition and development of parks in the neighborhood. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City General Services and Planning Department] 2.06 Orchard Park 2.06.01 Summary of major findings Orchard Park is a new facility with construction started in 1995 on approximately three-quarters I of an acre in the Marlene Subdivision between Gobbi Street and Talmage Road adjoining Highway 101. Orchard Park is a neighborhood park that will provide grassy areas for passive play and a picnic area. A creek -- including points for limited creek access -- adjoins the park to the south and provides an attractive natural feature. 2.06.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal PR-5: Develop the Orchard Park site with appropriate facilities. Policy PR-5.1: Serve the Marlene Subdivision area with a neighborhood park. Implementation Measure PR-5.1 (a): Develop Orchard Park as a passive park with play and picnic areas, and c~cck acccss [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: General Services] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 15 2.07 Riverside park 2.07.01 Summary of major findings The City of Ukiah owns property located at the east end of Gobbi Street which is bordered by the Russian River on the east. This area is commonly called Riverside Park. This parcel's size, loca- tion, and freeway access make it ideal for development into a City Park/Sports Complex. Since Little League and BMX are already established on this property, any new development should continue these uses. There is a need for two ball fields to accommodate Girls' and Women's Softball, and two ball fields for Pony and Colt Leagues. Additional or multi-use facilities for soccer and football fields should also be considered. Sand lot volleyball, horseshoe pits and outdoor basketball courts could be added. The only outdoor basketball hoops not located at local schools are the two at Vinewood Park. Portions of the park are proposed to be developed into playground area, open space, river beach access, and trails. The remaining land should include sufficient open space to be used as a buffer for wildlife and agriculture uses on the west and southern boundaries. This will lessen the impact of urban encroachment into existing agriculture zones. A walking area along the river with areas to sit and watch the river, would be beneficial. The park may be con- sidered an ideal location to build upon the natural beauty of the river environment. Lilile fields (3) I Figure V. 2-Z: Riverside Park existing facilities The park is located in proximity to active agricultural lands. While this City-owned land area provides unique opportunities for public access to the Russian River and adequate space for active recreation and organized sporting activities, it also presents potential for conflicts with the agribusiness to the west and south. Riverside Park needs to be developed with a conscientious "good neighbor" policy. This means that its ultimate design and use must be sensitive to the ongoing and long-established agricultural businesses. The "right-to-farm" policy of the Open Space and Conservation element is applicable to City development as it is to private development. The design of the park must consider issues such as property damage, noise, and agricultural spraying. Serious consideration needs to be given to the concept that unless security is available, the park should not be expanded. Access to the park is over Gobbi Street, which becomes River Road east of the Freeway. River Road narrows west of the park, with no shoulder, bicycle lanes, or pedestrian pathways. When the Riverside Park is expanded, appropriate improvements to the road should be made to accommodate vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County, Califomi'~ V.2. Parks and Recreation · Page 16 2.07.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs G oal PR--6: Develop Riverside Park into a City Park/Sports Complex. Policy PR-6.1: Collect in-lieu fees for the development of Riverside Park. Implementation Measure PR-6.1(a): Place designated in-lieu fees for Riverside Park into a Park Development Fund with funds used only for property acquisition and development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Departmentresponsible: Community Services] Policy PR-6. 2: Develop Riverside Park as a community park with improved, active park areas, with consideration to adjoining land owners, existing facilities and leases, partic- ularly those of an agricultural nature. Implementation Measure PR-6.2(a): Prepare and adopt a Riverside Park master plan.[rime- frame for completion: short-term planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/De- partment responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-6.2(b): Develop this park within the short- and intermediate-term planning period. [Timeframe for completion: Short- and intermediate-term planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Policy PR-6. 3: Provide protection for park users and owners of adjoining property. Implementation Measure PR-6.3(a): A program of security and patrol shall be prepared and funded prior to the commencement of park expansion to assure adjacent ranchers and property owners that their lands and improvements will be safe from damage. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term or intermediate-term planning period · Measure ap- plies to: City · Agency/Department responsible: Community Services and Public Safety] Implementation Measure PR-6.3(b): Recruit a resident caretaker to be housed at the park to provide park security and general maintenance. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-6.3(c): The security program shall include necessary provisions to ensure that park activities do not interfere with the "right-to-farm.' [Timetrame for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: C~y · Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-6.3(d): Prior to the final approval of any design plans for the development of Riverside Park, the City and its Parks and Recreation Commission shall meet with area residents and landowners to develop site specific criteria to be implemented as a part of the security of the adjoining land from park users. These programs may include limitations on the areas of the park to be generally accessible, control over the hours of park operations, and special day or date restrictions as may be necessary to accommodate adjoining agricultural uses. [Timeframe forcomp/e- tion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Department respon- sible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-6.3(e): During planning processes for Riverside Park, the City shall perform a traffic and circulation analysis to appropriately design Gobbi Street Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and ReCreation 4, Page ]7 for safe access by vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services and Public Works] 2.08 Community gardens 2.08.01 Summary of major findings Community gardens provide an uncommon recreational activity. A community garden allows groups of people to work together to grow herbs, fruits, and vegetables for home use. Further, it provides an opportunity for people whose residences do not have adequate land area to garden. As lot sizes continue to dwindle in cost cutting efforts to build homes for less money, setting aside common ground areas for gardens will become more and more important. For a number of years, the City has allowed operation of a community garden at the "Observatory" property on Observatory Street. Space in the community garden is allocated on a lottery basis. Strict adherence to City gardening rules is also required. In the Open Space and Conservation Element, the General Plan includes a program to allow the use of City-owned undeveloped parcels for community gardens. The opportunities to garden -- for leisure, personal economics, education, and as a place to meet friends and neighbors -- provide an active recreational benefit. More than just allowing interim use of land for community gardens, the City should encourage a long-term commitment to community gardens as a part of the parks and recreation program. Generally garden space should be made available on priority basis to those without personal yard space for a garden. The use of the garden should be open to all ages. If there is more interest in the garden than space available, the City should establish a lottery program to assign garden spaces every year. Although community gardens are "public uses" on public land, visits by non-participants should be limited to times when gardeners are present to protect their efforts. 2.08.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs GoalPR-7: Encourage community gardens as a park program. Policy PR-7.1: Allocate lands for community gardens and facilitate their development. Implementation Measure PR-7.1 (a): The Community Services Department shall identify City- owned or other public lands suitable for community gardens. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department respon- sible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR-7. I(b): Formalize a program for assigning residents to garden plots and creating operation and use rules for community gardens. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Community Services] Implementation Measure PR- 7. I (c): Promote the availability of neighborhood garden sites and establish an ongoing program of support. [Time,me for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 18 City of Ukiah llJli, Mendocino County, CalifomP~ Implementation Measure PR-ZI(d): Continue to allow public use of the existing community garden at the Observatory Site as long as compatible with other uses. [timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Community Services] 2.09 Community recreation facilities and activities 2.09.01 Summary of major findings Asdescribed in the opening section of this element, there is lack of indoor a recreational facilitie, s and meeting rooms within the City of Ukiah. A Recreation Center could improve the City s recreation programs by making available another facility in which activities could be scheduled. A new recreation center could be a site for a City-run "day camp" throughout the year to accommodate students that are "off track" at year-round schools. This is a current need the City is aware of but unable to address due to lack of appropriate facilities. The meeting rooms could be available for City and private functions. Additional gym space would be able to alleviate some of the "space crunch" experienced by the City recreational basketball and volleyball programs. A stage at the facility would allow for the production of community events other than those sponsored or performed at the Ukiah Playhouse. There are facilities with stages at some schools, fraternal organization buildings, and churches in the area. They are available on an intermittent basis for public use when not being used by the sponsoring organization. 2.09.01(A) Ukiah Valley Recreation Center To serve the need for both meeting facilities and indoor recreation, a multi-use facility will be needed. The multi-use facility must have adequate free-span floor space large enough for division into two basket- ball/volleyball courts. It would also be prudent to design the recreation center to include rooms and facilities for group meetings in order to increase its availability and usage. There are a number of different sites within the City that can be considered for this type of use. Consideration should be given first to the property located to the west of City Hall. This location is ideal, as it represents the "center" of Ukiah. By expanding the role of the properties now used as the center of City Government, a feeling of oneness and unity with the community could be achieved. Locating such a facility close to City Government allows its utilization by City Government. As an enhancement to City Hall, a central facility should be utilized as an extension for large meetings, hearings, and City-hosted seminars. These activities are difficult to plan due to the insufficient space and limited group facilities. Other potential sites include the property located on Low Gap Road west of the existing jail facility land near the existing railroad depot on the east side of the tracks, and the property in the vicinity of the old police department on north Main Street. The one critical component to make the recreation center a reality is the need for its fund-raising and development to be a joint public-private effort. The City and the County need to work with community groups and individuals to make the project a success. It is too expensive a capital item to anticipate that either the Board of Supervisors or the City Council would make funds available for its construction. 2.09.01(B) The Downtown Plaza To revitalize the Downtown, the area needs to be made more attractive and conducive to pedestrians. The Redevelopment Plan resulted in the construction of a plaza to replace little-used Stephenson Street Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 19 between South State and South School Streets. Abandoning the street and implementing the Revitalization Plan's Plaza are important to the success of downtown, and provide a gateway to the City's Ukiah Valley Conference Center. 2.09.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal PR-8: The City of Ukiah shall facilitate the public development of a recreation center. Policy PR-8.1: Creation of the recreation center shall require direct participation in the concept, the design, and the funding. Implementation Measure PR-8.1(a): The Parks and Recreation Commission and General Services Department shall provide technical and planning assistance for the development of a recreation center as a public-private venture. The City's commitment shall be: The City shall have final choice on the selection of a site. Ukiah may purchase, trade, or otherwise acquire the site; The City shall serve as a catalyst for the creation of a public non-profit group, which shall be responsible to raise the money for capital construction and completion; The public group shall work with City officials and staff to design a flexible, multi-purpose facility. The City shall be responsible for the ongoing costs of operations and maintenance, ii !![Timefra~ ~r :~e~: LO~erm. p~n~ pefl~,' ~ ~ i ~asure ap- pliesto:C~ :~i*; ~:! a~nt. :C~'COU~I] Policy PR-8.2: Develop programs and activities designed for all ages and all segments of the community. Implementation Measure PR-8.2(a): Continue to support the Parks and Recreation De- partment's efforts to expand its services to the community. [rimetreme tot completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Council] 2. fO Walking, hiking, and equestrian trails 2.10.01 Summary of major findings There is a need for publicly accessible trails in the Ukiah Valley. A network of hiking and equestrian trails would enhance the quality of life in the Ukiah Valley. It is important to begin the process of siting routes for the trail network now, in order to facilitate their development over time. The purpose of identifying routes within the General Plan is to provide guidance for final site selection and acquisition of lands for routes when the properties are proposed for a development change from existing uses. Failure to start this planning process now may result in future lost oppommities. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califomia V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 20 The hills bordering the Valley present scenic vistas for hikers and riders when viewed from a trail that follows the course of the river. The Russian River is an under used recreational resource which should be conserved and developed to promote Ukiah's water resource recreation opportunities. The development of trails, particularly those along the Russian River, must be accompanied by mechanisms to ensure a high level of maintenance, security, and safety. This provides protection for the trail users and those owning property and running agribusinesses along the trail. A hiking trail alongside the Russian River could result in an unacceptable risk of vandalism to the pear orchards and other agricultural lands bordering it in the absence of a high level of maintenance and security along the trail. Although there may be a potential long-term need for public hiking and activity trails throughout the Planning Area and the City, the state of public finance in the mid-1990s makes planning for acquisition and development of new areas difficult. The City, the County, and various other public entities have control over a substantial amount of existing land with the potential for public access. There are under used publicly-owned lands within the Planning Area which could be developed for access and other facilities related to hiking and equestrian trails. This would be preferable to acquiring or purchasing private lands not voluntarily offered for trail use. Existing public ownership reduces the potential development cost by elimi- nating the need to acquire or purchase land. Of course, the focus of the public agencies on already- owned lands is not meant to discourage private or non-profit groups creating a trail network without the use of public funds. It is important to begin visioning and mai~ping such trails now before incompatible developments destroy the possibility of constructing a complete network of trails. Future trails on agricultural lands should be developed after the conclusion of agricul- tural use of the property. The City and County recognize that opening trails along commercial agricultural lands will create conflict: urban populations want to "get away from the hustle of City activities to the peace and quiet of a rural trail" and commercial agricultural is associated with noise, dust, and use of organic and chemical compounds. The approach in the General Plan is to identify "future trail sites~ for purposes of acquiring ease- ments or other access rights at the time the land use is convened from agribusiness. An interim approach to satisfying desired river access is to site and approve an aquatic trail with defined points of ingress and egress to the river. The concept is to provide controlled points of public Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and ReCreation 4, 'Page 2] access with restroom facilities, parking, and safe locations for putting non-motorized canoes, rafts, kayaks, inner tubes, and similar water sports equipment. The aquatic trail needs to be established with rules pro- tecting lands from trespass and vandalism. It's a future concept that may need other limitations imposed to protect not only adjoining property owners, but the City and County from liability. Private property fights are a critical consideration during the interim period between the identification of areas on which trails are desired and the imposition of those requirements. The City, County, or other recreation agency may ultimately acquire trail rights-of-way or easements as lands convert to non-agricul- tural uses. The development of-those rights-of-way must, however, be undertaken in a manner that will ensure that remaining agribusiness is not subject to trespass, vandalism, or other damage from intrusion of urban use into the agricultural area. Trails should not be developed or made accessible until there is adequate security to preclude or prevent trespass or damage to private property. When resource lands are converted from a resource use to a non-resource use through the discretionary project review process (General Plan amendments, changes of zoning district, subdivision and parcel maps, conditional use permits), the City or County may require that a dedication of the identified trail route be made to the agency as a condition of the project's approval. The offer of dedica- tion, however, does not require that the City or County accept the offer now or in the future. The dedication may be held in abeyance until a more logical trail route is acquired or ready to be developed. The agency might then accept the offer at that future date. 2.10.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal PR-9: Establish future routes for public trails *in the Planning Area. Policy PR-9.1: Make use of existing public lands for public access prior to developing or purchasing other private lands for trails. Implementation Measure PR-9.1 (a): Develop hiking trails, river access, or other trails on existing publicly-owned lands, lands voluntarily offered to public agencies, or lands converted from a resource production use to a non-resource production use by way of a discretionary permit approval, prior to purchasing new private lands for trails or developing trails on non-publicly owned lands. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department and Board ~UPervis0rs] Implementation Measure PR-9.1 (b): Route selection shall provide for a network of trails, allowing for unconnected segments due to long-term impediments to the continuous trail -- such as private land ownership, environmentally sensitive areas, existing land uses, and public safety -- including law enforcement issues. [Timeframe forcom- pletion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: Community Services, C, eu~]H:~aN~-, ~a~i~S~rvis0rs] Policy PR-9. 2: Trail development is not to interfere with agribusiness use or the right-to-farm. Implementation Measure PR-9.2(a): The City and County may accept trail rights-of-way offered, but shall not develop such trails if the route will likely result in trespass onto agricultural lands, interference with agricultural operations, or damage to agricultural lands, equipment, or crops. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning Adopted by the City Council: Septei~ber, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation ~, ?age :22. City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califom!= period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure PR-9.2(b): When lands that are used for resource production -- including and not limited to agriculture, cattle ranching, orchards, vineyards, and mining -- are proposed for a change from the current use or zoning district to a non-resource production land use, require an "offer of dedication" of identified trail routes as a condition of approval or note on the parcel or final map provided appropriate findings related to the "rough proportionality" of the dedication requirements can be adopted. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building] Implementation Measure PR-9.2(c): The City or County shall not be required to accept an offer of dedication until a trail is ready for development through an area. If no trails are proposed to be developed in an area, or if the identified trail routes are amended, the City or County may abandon the route and any acquired lands for trail routes. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, Cc:.'nty m,~l-.~~!,eoa~:.:of 8u~som] Implementation Measure PR-9.2(d): Development of the trail systems and opening for public access shall be deferred until the route may be used without interference to agricultural uses. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure ap- plies to: City and County ~ Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, " ...... PI& r, r,:, n,~ ---' ~'' ':"~:-- B~rd of supervisors] VUUI II.J* al IU UUIIUII I~ Goal PR-lO: Coordinate the creation of a hiking and equestrian trail (the dm tra//) to encir- cle the Valley. Policy PR-IO.I: Coordinate the route selection and mapping of a hiking and equestrian trail that encircles the entire Ukiah Valley. Implementation Measure PR-IO.I(a): The City and County shall coordinate to assign staff or a consultant to initiate and coordinate the visioning and mapping of a hillside trail around the Ukiah Valley during the short-term planning period. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Community Services, ~ BOard ~:SupendSors] Implementation Measure PR-IO.I(b): Encourage private or non-profit organizations to acquire, develop, and maintain the rim trail route. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors ] Goal PR-Il: Promote a recreation trail and/or an aquatic trail along the Russian River. Policy PR-II.I: Coordinate the identification of a recreation trail and/or an aquatic trail on the Rus- sian River. Implementation Measure PR-II. I (a): Assess and evaluate existing rights-of-way access to the Russian River and determine if additional access is needed. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Community Services, ,Set~ Boardof SU~Wisors] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, ?age 23 Implementation Measure PR-II.I (b): The Russian River trail shall be routed to include and connect where feasible to the existing trail system around Lake Mendocino. [rime- frame for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Geu~ B~ !of.S. pPe~isors] Policy PR-Il.2: Thc City and County shall take thc lead in coordinating trail development efforts. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, Califomi" V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 24 iI Conceptual for the rim trail an conneclions Io river tr~ Planning Area City Limits Figure V.2-AA: Location of the Conceptual Trail Routes and connection with County trails Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jill, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, ?age 25 Implementation Measure PR-11.2(a): The City and County shall take the lead in coordinating the efforts to identify the routes, public access points, and multiple use potential of the Russian River trail system. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Community Services, ~oard Of SL!~is0rs] Goal PR-12: Ensure trails are planned with community participation. Policy PR-12.1:Establish a Trails Committee to assist in the planning and review of all proposed trail planning, access acquisition, and development. Implementation Measure PR-12.1 (a): Appoint for this purpose a Trails Committee including residents of the Ukiah Valley committed to trails, and owners of agricultural, residential, public, or other lands neighboring the proposed trail routes. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agen- cy/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure PR-12.1 (b): A maintenance and security program shall be established which will reasonably satisfy the owners of lands along the proposed trails that their property interests will be protected. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Public Safety, County Sheriff] Implementation Measure PR-12.1(c): Under advisement of the trails committee, place an initiative on the ballot for the purpose of establishing and funding a special district or other method it deems best suited for the acquisition, development, maintenance, security patrols, and fire management of all trails. This shall occur during the short-term planning period. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure PR-12.1 (d): Encourage a public-private parmership for the purchase of land which is mapped for the above-mentioned trails, including joint powers agreements with other public entities, and including consideration of a land trust to which landowners may make conservation easements and thereby obtain tax benefits. [Timeframe for completion: Short- or intermediate-term planning period 4, Mea- sure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] 2. f I Bicycle paths, routes, and lane 2.11.01 Summary of major findings Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ M®ndocino County, Califom!- V.2. Parks and Recreation 4,. Page 26 ! I I I # # # # Streets Signed routes Striped route BICYCLE ROUTES Figure V.2-BB: City designated bicycle routes Bike Route Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 27 ~lanning Area City Limits Figure V.2-CC: Planning Area designated bicycle routes Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County, California V.2. Parks and Recreation ,t, Page 28 ~e City 0f~is =inClUded in'theMend~ino, =Bi~cle'==~r~Plan~ '~Plan provides for a system of bicycle routes which links the =~ area With Other~mmum~ties in MendoCino CoUnty. It also parks and ReCreation Element.. Currently, bicycle travel in Ukiah :is primarily for.recreation, ~ the bicycle system is consistent'with this type of use. Bicycle routes fall under one of three ClaSSifications: :Class I are paths which Physically separate bicycles from automobile traffic; C~s II. are bicyCle lanes whichhave been striped along streets and highways; and Class HI are routes where no specific fac~flity for bicycles exists, but bicycle travel can be reasonably accommodated along side automobile traffic. Ukiah has 'ClaSs IIand IH bike lanes. As Ukiah develops further, the use of bicycles for commuting as an alternative to the automobiles with one occupant may increase and should be promoted. BicyCle routes currently exist in urb~ areas :of the City, as Well as'ce~ urban areas.just outside the 'City limits and in the CountY. The major routes are striped .and/or signed,.providingone major north, south corridor (most of Dora Street and portions of state StreeO,:and:three.east.west .-routes ~almage. Gobbi and Perkins Streets). HoWever, it is'noted that additionalbike lanes in 'the Valley would provide a greater degree of flexibility.-safety, and access'for bicyclists, and that the planning and installation of more bike lanes likely would foster increased use. of~ alternative mode of:transportation. The connecting network of bikepatl-us must be':.deVelO~ With a :n~r Of priorities :to ensure its success. First, the City and County need to ensure that~there are safe bicycle lanes'on streets accessing schools. The second priority must inClUde streets with bike' lanes to parks:and playgroundS. ~'The third priority is aSsigned to . streets serving shopping areas of :the City, The fourth priority wilI be directed to roads providing access:to.Lake MendOcino. :The -fifth ~ priority :is'seen aS?the streets accessing .the library. Bicycle lanes and routes are included in more detail in the Traffic and Circulation Element of the General Plan. 2.11.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs G oal PR-13: Identify safe bicycle lanes within the Ukiah Valley. Policy PR-13.1: Establish safe bicycle travel lanes. Implementation Measure PR-13. l (a): Establish and maintain safe bicycle lanes on all streets that meet the standards for traffic, parking and bicycle lanes within its jurisdiction. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: City and County · , Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino Council of Govemments as the Local Transportation Commission] Policy PR-13.2: Coordinate a connective network of existing and new bicycle lanes to enhance and enable the safe movement of bicycle traffic within the city and surrounding areas. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.2. Parks and Recreation 4, Page 29 Implementation Measure PR-13.2(a): During the short-term planning period, identify all streets meeting standards for safe bicycle lanes and begin construction or identification of such lanes. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino Council of Governments as the Local Transportation Commission] Implementation Measure PR-13.2(b): Establish an ongoing review program through the Mendocino Council of Governments to ensure that safe bicycle lanes are included in all road improvements or widening projects. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino Council of Governments as the Local Transportation Commission] Policy PR-13.3: All new developments shall incorporate safe bicycle lanes in project street design. Implementation Measure PR-13.3(a): Amend the Land Development Code to require safe bicycle lanes or paths as appropriate in all new subdivision streets and in new projects. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ll~ Mendocino County 3 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources 4, Page I HISTORIC AND ARCH, CEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3. Of Governmental decision-making 3.01.01 Summary of major findings m.TURAL P.r~otmcr~ ~ nonrenewable. Trying to offset an adverse effect on a cultural resource rather than preserving the resource may, at times, be inconsistent with State policy and the objectives of cultural resources management and historic preservation. Mitigation -- the reduction or elimination of impacts to less than significant levels -- as an alternative to protecting and preserving cultural resources can ultimately result in the disappearance of such resources.' A systematic program for the protection or preservation of cultural and historic resources may result in avoiding a cumulative loss of the a~sthetic, educational, and recreational aspects of these resources. A program of governmental decision-making can assist in the offset of cumulative losses of prehistoric and historical sites. The disappearance of these community assets may erode sources of scientific information, educational oppommities, or result in the loss of areas holding special cultural significance to specific eth- nic and other cultural groups. The loss of historical buildings, structures, and landscape can result in per- manent alteration of the appearance of a city or the countryside. Preservation of cultural resources is accomplished through education, cooperation, and a commitment to programs that make sense to the community. The Ukiah commitment is to maintain cultural resources as a link to past populations -- those whose ancestors called this Valley their home from time immemorial and those who adopted the Valley later as part of the growth of the United States. Over the years, the importance of preserving and protecting historic and archaeological resources has been viewed as both a critical means to enhancing quality of life and as a hindrance to achieving future growth. Ukiah's residents recognize that effective cultural resource protection is a balance between preserving the past and accommodating the future. The crucial concept is consideration of cultural resources early in the permitting process. With early planning, cultural resources protection or preservation can usually be incorporated into project designs in such a way that impacts are kept to a minimum. With early planning, an archaeological site may be made part of an open-space requirement or preserved in a riparian corridor setback. Other solutions can also be developed. Experience in California has shown that when consideration of cultural resources is not included in the project planning process, costly archaeological mitigation may then be the only alternative to a project being substantially reduced in scope or denied outright. The objective of this section of the General Plan is to put into place the governmental programs needed to avoid costly delays or impacts to projects from the last-minute discovery of important cultural resources. Cultural resources need active protection and preservation. 'Condensed from City of Ukiah General Plan Revision Resource Directory, "Cultural Resources: Archceological, Architectural, Historical, and Native American Sites' (Stockton: Archaeological Services, Inc., March 11, 1992). Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Histodc and Archaeological Resources 4, Page 2 City of Ukiah ~1, Mendocino County, Califomi; Areas of high cultural sensitivity Areas with the outline only have the potential to be culturally sensitive. ! 1 I ! ! Figure V.3-DD: Areas of high archaeological sensitivity Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County , ,, Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Vi3. Historic and Archaeological Resources 4, Page 3 In order to ensure protection of cultural resources, important sites must be identified. Within the General Plan, Figure V.3-DD identifies areas in which there is a "high" likelihood that important cultural resources2 may be found. This map is not a listing of identified archaeological sites or even an indication that important sites will be found. Rather, the map indicates that terrain, location of already-recorded sites, and other scientific factors indicate a greater-than-typical potential to find important archaeological sites. Connected with the General Plan goals and the need for early planning, this map provides property owners with an opportunity to seek an archceological reconnaissancea prior to submitting an application to the City or County. The early review by a qualified professional or local representative of Native American cultures can provide opportunities and methods of reducing or avoiding impacts to important cultural resources. Maintaining records of the various historic and archaeological studies that have been prepared within the Ukiah area rests with the Northwest Information Center of the California Archaeological Inventory (NWIC) at Sonoma State University in Rohnert Park. The NWIC functions as an area clearinghouse. When a "literature review" is performed, it means that the professional preparing the review perused the records at NWIC. In addition, NWIC provides information to cities and counties about areas where important resources are likely to be found. The NWlC has the resources available to provide a front-line archaeological review. While this step does not replace field reconnaissance, it provides project applicants with an opportunity to determine whether or not there is a high likelihood of a cultural resource discovery on the property in question. Referring project applications -- especially those in the "high sensitivity areas" -- to NWlC early in the review process helps plan for impacts and mitigation. Maintaining a strong historic base in the style and character of older houses is a unique challenge. A legacy of homes of beauty and style has been preserved for the future. Concurrently, a need exists to provide safe, secure housing at prices affordable to those with low and moderate incomes. Occasional funding programs provide monies that can be used for rehabilitation of older homes. Rehabilitation of older homes to serve the needs of low and moderate income families must be tackled with sensitivity to the home's historic character. Historic preservation, however, is not a proper issue to be used as a means of precluding or denying affordable housing assistance programs. The focus fOr preservation efforts Sh0~d be 'p~arily on;~e'Older..l~restside, Downtown, and the ?Wagonsellers [Norton, Clara, and Ford area] residential neighborh~, There..are other neighborhoods ~hich may become .h~torically sig~cant ::.~e..~ture: but:~~t. ~' ~. .at ~is ~lime. i~NeW :~idenees ~ histOriC homes :?~Uld'! ~lem~-~e~'i:~ric.~il~gi::: 'design compati- ~. Replicating or imitating the.styles of the Past, however,' is 'rarelYsu~~;~' ~ design takes into I:onsideration the height.and ::~ale the surrounding :buUd~S,:i.:/Approp~te :~tbacks :need to be ~nsidered. Property' owners of existing structures'~ investin rehabilitali0n when they m'be assured their inves~¢nts. ~ ~'.Areha~ological 2Important cultural resources are those def'med in the California Environmental Quality Act as providing unique or "exceptional quality" representation of a historic or archaeological resource habitation, use, activity, or event. 3An archceological reconnaissance is a limited field and literature review by a qualified professional to determine whether there is a strong likelihood for more detailed work. In many cases, the reconnais- sance -- an inexpensive level of work -- is able to resolve questions of potential cultural resource sites without extensive field work or actual excavation. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County, Califomi'- V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources ~, Page 4 Over the years, as the City and County seats of government have grown, moved, or rebuilt, many of the records of the area's history have been lost. Some pioneer families have donated their records to local organizations to maintain the written links to the past. Neither the City nor the County has a facility for maintaining the archival records of history. Although California law provides methods for disposal of records, some ingredients of the area's official actions and approvals should be retained for future research -- especially records related to development, building permits, or transactions of local government. While maintaining a strong vision of the past, the City must also ensure the quality of new development. The people who live and work in the Ukiah Valley appreciate the charm and patina of historic buildings which have withstood the challenge of time. Just as important is an assurance to future generations that the quality of development design in the life of the General Plan provides our future residents a legacy of homes, offices, stores, and industry in buildings of character and quality. 3.01.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HA-l: Create organizational, regulatory, and incentive programs to facilitate preser- vation. Policy HA-I.I: Create a Historic and Archaeological Resources Committee (HARC). Implementation Measure HA-I.I(a): Within one year of adopting the General Plan, designate a committee with responsibility for Historic and Archaeological Resources. [Time- frame for completion: Short-term planning period ~t, Measure applies to: City ~, Agen- cy~Department responsible: Planning Department] Policy HA-1.2: Establish a preservation program to integrate preservation as a component of government decision-making. Implementation Measure HA-I.2(a): The City shall staff and assist the Committee with the implementation of historic preservation programs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~ Agency/Departmentresponsible: Planning Department] Policy HA-I. 3: Establish clear and efficient procedures for processing applications affecting historic properties. Implementation Measure HA-I.3(a): Amend the Land Development Code to reflect preserva- tion concerns and adopt the State Historic Building Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Section 8). [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Mea- sure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure l-l~-].3(b): The City and County Planning staff shall continue application review procedures with the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Planning Department] Policy HA-1.4: Balance the need to rehabilitate affordable housing with maintaining historic character. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County ,,, Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Historic and ArchaeOlogical Resources ~, Page 5 Implementation Measure HA-I.4(a): Seek public funds for affordable housing to be used for repairs and remodels that maintain the historic fabric of homes, other structures, or sites. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Policy HA-I.5: Maintain and archive public and donated records important to the area's history and pre-history. G Implementation Measure HA-I.5(a): Utilizing the volunteer services or staff services of the Mendocino County Historical Records Commission, develop a program to review the historic and cultural value of records prior to destruction. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City and County Clerks] Implementation Measure HA-1.5(b): Establish a program for the systematic archiving, management, and retention of public records and donated private records that could aid in the research and documentation of historical, architectural, and archaeological resources. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Clerks] oal HA-2: Identify historical, architectural, archaeological, and natural places that give the area its special character and aid its future well-being. Policy HA-2.1: Designate historical, architectural, archaeological, and natural places on State and Federal preservation lists. Implementation Measure HA-2. I (a): During the short-term planning period, prepare a list of cultural and historic resources worthy of nomination to state or national preservation lists. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: HARe and volunteer groups] Policy HA-2.2: Support strong and effective historic and scenic preservation. G Implementation Measure HA-2.2(a): During the short-term planning period, adopt a Historic Archceological Preservation ordinance to review permanent changes to the exterior or setting of designated historic or impacts to archaeological resources. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] oal HA-3: Maintain, protect, and enhance the area's heritage, including and not limited to its cultural, historical, spiritual, social, economic, architectural, agricultural, archaeological, and scenic heritage. Policy HA-3. I: Encourage the highest standards of maintenance for historical resources. Implementation Measure HA-3.1 (a): Pursue funding programs to assist property owners in completing needed repairs to historic properties. Provide information to the public about where to get assistance and advice concerning historic preservation. [Time- frame for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah/I~ Mendocino County, Califomla V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources 4, Page 6 Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County P',ar;r;~,3 ---' ~"';'";"-,, HiSt0~I S~ety] Policy HA-3.2: Encourage adaptive reuse compatible with neighborhoods. Implementation Measure HA-3.2(a): The Land Development Code shall include standards for adaptive reuse of residential structures in residential areas ensuring compatibility with the neighborhood. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy HA-3.3: Require the Redevelopment Agency to integrate preservation as a component of decision-making. Implementation Measure HA-3.3(a): When reviewing proposals for redevelopment, the Redevelopment Authority shall consider effects on historic resources prior to approving actions. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure ap- plies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Redevelopment Authority] Implementation Measure HA-3.3(b): All feasible opportunities to preserve historic resources shall be explored ~ough~ a~redevel a~i~Prior to permitting the or. ..... t. ~ _A.~ .... ~ ......... :..:,_. [Timeframe forcom- destruction of such resources. -,,,,,,~,, ,, ,,,,,~,,,,,~, .............. ~. pletion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal HA-4: Policy HA-4. I' Conserve the character and architecture of neighborhoods. Consider the visual character of surrounding developments when reviewing discretionary project approvals. Implementation Measure HA-4.1(a): The Planning Commission and City Council shall consider the visual character of surrounding developments when reviewing discretionary project approvals. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] 3.02 Publicly. owned property 3.02.01 Summary of major findings The City and County can set an example of historic preservation to private property owners. Public properties include some large buildings and pieces of land that, due to their size, have an impact on the properties surrounding them. Other City and County properties are important because of their location. City and County property often serves as a cornerstone, setting a standard for the surrounding properties. The Ukiah City Hall is an excellent example of quality renovation with sensitivity to historic preservation. Both the City and County own public areas that are highly visible to all citizens. These properties will set the tone for privately-held properties. One aspect of leadership that both the City and County can use is to seek a standard of design that sets an exemplary standard for quality in appearance. The appropriate use of signs, graphics, colors, and detail trim on buildings and other public facilities will create a standard of quality. Quite often, local governments economize on facility appearance. This results in a legacy of architectural "shoeboxes" as public monuments and sets a poor example for private developers. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah tl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources 4, Page 7 Public agencies have the most flexibility when it comes to preserving historic structures or sites. The agencies' development plans may be more visible than similar private projects or there may be a larger community stake in the proposal. The role of the City, County, and other public agencies includes a responsibility to preserve the area's character and architectural and cultural integrity. This includes maintaining the appearance of Ukiah's streets, trees, landscaping, parks and buildings. G 3.02.02 oal ItA-5: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Maintain the character and integrity of historic publicly-owned facilities, struc- tures, and sites. Policy HA-5.1: Maintain and improve publicly-owned historic buildings and sites in an architec- turally and environmentally sensitive manner. Implementation Measure HA-5.1(a): The City and County shall include maintenance and enhancement funds in capital budgets for City- and County-owned historic buildings and sites. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure ap- plies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council] Implementation Measure HA-5.1(b): During development of new public facilities, the City shall avoid impacts to important archaeological resources when feasible or mitigate the impacts to the extent required by environmental review. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department respon- sible: City Council] 3.03 Commercial areas 3.03.01 Summary of major findings The area resplendent outstanding examples of historically or architecturally significant is with commercial buildings. At the same time, older areas of town abound with conflicting design patterns in which nondescript structures of recent vintage have been sited adjoining or between architectural patriarchs. To embellish and take advantage of the economic opportunities that historic preservation in commercial areas provide, the City needs to ensure that new development meshes and complements the older character of the community's downtown core. Downtown Ukiah provides a focal point for the residents of Ukiah. This area gives a sense of community and contact with the past. The downtown is a center that draws together citizens, government and business. Too often, communities grow with no unifying element. Ukiah's downtown can serve as a place where diversity can come together, providing a healthy community spirit. Too often, change means sacrificing whatever is "old" for something "new". This costs valuable ties to the past and would weaken the sense of the uniqueness of Ukiah. Renovation of existing buildings is a cost effective way to create an aesthetic, pleasant place for our citizens to shop, bank, work, and socialize. Clusters of businesses support one another. Shoppers are more likely to go to a location where they can accomplish many errands than to go to several locations spaced apart. Workers appreciate having shops, restaurants, and services near work. Investment in the downtown will be protected if the individual property owner has reasonable assurances that his renovations will be supported and enhanced by other Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, Califomla V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources ~, Page 8 property owners in the area. New structures and renovations must consider the overall style and scale of the area. The Historic and Archaeological Resources Committee (HARC) can work with the downtown business association to assist the merchants and property owners in appropriate decision-making. Cost effective approaches to rehabilitation must be the essence of the work of the HARC. This spirit of cooperation has been successful in many towns. Although many communities mandate compliance, the Ukiah direction is to pursue the spirit of cooperation through education and leadership. Commercial use of historic buildings is not limited to Ukiah's downtown area. Mixed use areas have · commercial and residential buildings side-by-side. Ukiah is in particular danger of losing some of these historic buildings -- such as the houses on Clara Street. If these neighborhoods do become predominately commercial in use, the historic buildings should be preserved and creative reuse encouraged. Other communities have prospered because they have used their historic resources for commercial benefit. Local trade, as well as tourism, will be enhanced when historic buildings are maintained. When older buildings are converted to new uses, the City sometimes runs into a conflict between the "current" Uniform Building Code (UBC) and the historic character of the buildings. At times, the historic integrity of a structure is needlessly damaged when remodeled to meet the current standards of the UBC. When preservation and new codes conflict, the City is able to turn to the Historic Building Code (HBC). The HBC was adopted by the State of California to provide optional methods that permit modern building safety standards to be achieved while retaining the historic integrity and patina of older structures. Ukiah has also adopted use of the HBC. 3.03.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HA-6: Protect the character and architecture of older commercial areas. Policy HA-6.1: Encourage new construction that is compatible with historic neighborhood charac- ter. Implementation Measure HA-6.1 (a): Utilize design standards in the Land Development Code to encourage and provide incentives for historically-sensitive new development when needed to conform to neighborhood character. Policy HA-6.2: Encourage the preservation, maintenance, enhancement, and reuse of existing his- torical buildings. Implementation Measure HA-6.2(a): Develop code provisions during the short-term planning period to ensure that historic buildings are preserved, maintained, or enhanced appropriately with the structure and neighborhood's character. Implementation Measure HA-6.2(b): Encourage the retention and renovation of existing residential structures in commercial zones and the relocation of these residential structures when on-site retention is not feasible. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Historic and ArchaeologiCal Resources '~ Page 9 3.04 Privately owned historic resources 3.04.01 Summary of major findings Throughout the Planning Area, there are examples of important and potentially important historical and archaeological resources. Although located on private lands, these sites have significance for the community in presenting a heritage and cultural history of the Valley. There are instances in which the historic or character value of a building is in its context. To main- tain this value, it may be necessary to evaluate groups of buildings in "districts." Using Federal or State criteria, a district can be defined to provide a specific area of historic or cultural value. ~¢ntly; ~ere ~e three "distri~" ~ ~ conta~glhiStpfi~l!y Si~fieant ~cturesi.,inc!ufi~g th~ dOwntov~n area, necessary research, analySis,~and paperwork ~ acco~l~hefi: Table V.3-13: Official historic listings Held-Poage House* Sun House (~26)* Palace Hotel* Vichy Springs Resort None listed None Ii ' - ] ..... II Sun House* [(~80) [ s~ea [ none dstea il Hofman House* J [ I t il ~ i~::~ii~i~i ~ ~B~!!iiiii!i?:ii!i!ii!!!!!!i!ii!ii!!!!iii i ~~~:~:~::~ ..........~::::.: ............. ': .................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... Situations may occur when an historic structure, or a building with historic value, may need to be demolished for any number of reasons. With many historic resources, it may be appropriate to "mitigate" removal by photographing and recording as much information as is known about the site. However, when the building in question is located within an historic district or neighborhood, removing a building may be inappropriate. Early project design to incorporate the building, thus preserving it, may be the desired approach. The value of other resources, such as archaeological sites, may be in the information contained within the resource. However, new archaeological techniques and new archaeological research questions continue · to be developed. Therefore, mitigation by retrieving information through excavation is not always appropriate, as a certain portion of archaeological sites or whole sites need to be preserved for future exploration and study. When possible, cultural resources need to be actively preserved in situ and protected from damage or disturbance. The General Plan needs to provide a balance between the preservation of historic and archaeological sites for future study and analysis and the demands for current growth and development. Project design and other features of development flexibility can provide the needed protection while still preserving property rights. The purpose of this element is to establish the criteria for this balance. Unlike other elements where conservation of a resource is the emphasis, preservation is the focus for cultural resources. Once destroyed, these resources are irretrievable. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources 4, Page 10 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County, Califomi- In the current economic system, it has been accepted that the willingness to assume the risks and responsibilities of ownership brought with it certain privileges. Private property ownership has traditionally meant the owner makes the major decisions about the use, maintenance, occupancy, and changes to the property. A given owner's decisions regarding his/her property may not have met with the approval of everyone in the community, but the freedom of choice that comes with ownership usually outweighed disapproval. Over time, more and more laws in the form of model codes, local planning ordinances, environmental protection and other regulation began to influence what a private property owner could and could not do with a property. Questions were raised about issues that dealt with the "greater public good." Today, one of those "greater public good" issues is the preservation versus protection of historical resources. There are strongly held opinions on both sides of this issue. It is not too difficult to find places where many old and historic buildings have been lost to demolition. The coming of the "modern age" in the 40s and 50s in communities, defined change as "out with the old and in with the new." Many old buildings were either bulldozed or had their decorative trim removed. Exteriors were "modernized" being remodeled with "newer" looking materials like stucco and asbestos siding. Sometimes whole neighborhoods changed, with little thought given to preserving historical heritage. As time passed, some citizens became aware of the fact that the buildings from the past were becoming fewer. Of those that remained, many had received additions and remodeling which altered the original appearance. Downtown core areas were deteriorating with the shift from traditional downtown and neighborhood business to regional shopping centers and business parks. There was a need to create something unique and interesting in the old downtown areas to attract business. The "re-creation of yesterday" was a popular theme. The General Plan guiding the growth of the Valley for the next twenty years answers important questions regarding historical resources. The General Plan calls for preserving older buildings in a viable condition today so that future generations can enjoy them. The issues center on: VVhat does it mean to be historically significant? Should mandatory rules be passed so that private property owners are required to preserve these older structures? If so, should the laws apply to all old buildings or just those with historical significance? Is it proper to place the full cost of preservation on the property owner? There is significant resistance on the part of private property owners to all encompassing regulation. Can a balance be found to preserve truly historical buildings and that provides a support system of encouragement to private property owners for their efforts to preserve and restore other viable older buildings and structures? 3.04.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HA-7: Participate in preserving privately-owned historical structures. Policy HA-7.1: Actively participate in the conservation and preservation of privately-owned histori- cal structures. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources 4, Page 11 e 1 cn"r' OF' UK~.t I c~c CEN'mR '~~ 4~ e 1. Palace Hotel 2. 272 N. State St. Held-Poage House 603 w. Perkins St. e Hofman House 4. 308 s. School St. Sun House 431 s. Main St. Se Vichy Springs Resort (not shown; located in the eastern hills, at the terminus of Vichy Springs Rd.) Figure V.3-EE: Location 'of Historic buildings, landmarks, and resources in the Planning Area and City of Ukiah Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi- V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources · Page 12 Implementation Measure HA-ZI(a): When projects are proposed to be located in, or affect an area of historic or archaeological significance, utilize the Historic and Archaeological Review Committee for review and comment on proposed projects. [Timeframe tot completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Department responsible: Historic and Archaeological Review Committee] Policy HA-Z2: Seek creative solutions to the problems of preservation and maintenance ofhistoric properties. Implementation Measure HA-Z2(a): During the short-term planning period, require the Historic and Archaeological Resources Committee to prepare a solution-oriented Guidebook for historic preservation and maintenance of historic structures. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/De- partment responsible: Historic and Archaeological Review Committee] Implementation Measure I-L4-7. 2(b): Ensure that energy conservation measures (retrofitting) are compatible with preservation standards. Implementation Measure HA-7.2(c): Utilize the Historic Building Code provisions of the Uniform Building Code to protect the appearance of historic resources. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City and County · Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy HA-7. 3: Encourage appropriate adaptive reuse of historic resources. Implementation Measure HA-7.3(a): HARC shall develop its procedures for City Council action to encourage and focus on adaptive re-use of historic resources. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Department responsible: Historic and Archaeological Review Committee] Policy HA-7. 4: Encourage the use fiscal incentives for preservation. Implementation Measure HA-7.4(a): Establish a City Council policy for the acceptance of preservation easements, facade easements,n and other methods to preserve the exterior appearance of historic stmctures. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Council] Implementation Measure HA-Z 4(b): In the event of unavoidable demolition of a historic re- source, utilize design review procedures to ensure that the replacement use of the site enhances the special character of the area from which the structure is removed. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agen- cy~Department responsible: Historic and Archaeological Review Committee] Implementation Measure HA- 7. 4(c): Require drawings or photographic records be prepared and architectural fixtures be salvaged or preserved from historic structures proposed for demolition. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Departrnentresponsible: Histodc and Archaeological Review Committee] 4A "facade easement' is an easement granted to the City that allows the City to become a participant in the design, remodeling, or change of the exterior appearance of the building. In some cases within historic districts, the City actually takes responsibility for the maintenance of the exterior in order to use public money to protect the historic character. The property owner receives tax breaks for the easement. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah JlJli, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.3. Historic and Archaeological Resources 4, Page 13 Implementation Measure HA-Z4(d): Facilitate the salvage of materials from buildings that are not to be preserved in order to utilize or adapt the materials for new buildings. 3.05 Community education 3.05.01 Summary of major findings One of the important reasons for preserving archaeological and historic resources is for their educational value. Today's children can learn about the lifestyles of those who came before. The community needs to ensure a long-term understanding of the value of historic buildings, neighborhoods and sites. Understanding the past promotes a sense of pride and community spirit, which helps to create a strong sense of place. It is this shared experience that keeps a community viable and healthy. Information concerning historic events, historic architectural elements and the archaeological past will increase our citizens' awareness of the importance of preservation and foster respect for Ukiah's heritage. This allows different factions of society to come together for common goals and promotes appreciation of their diverse contributions. Many programs on Ukiah's history are already successful, such as the Grace Hudson Museum, Sun House Guild, Held-Poage Library, and the public library archives. Continued support for these groups, and others not mentioned, is essential. Promotion of area heritage will attract tourism and business. Education is always the first step toward understanding and implementation of effective programs. More can be done in the Valley to increase appreciation of cultural diversity, thereby lessening conflicts between groups and the cost those conflicts might incur. G 3.05.02 oal HA-8: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Promote community heritage in order to educate citizens of all ages and build civic pride. Policy HA-8. I: Seek to educate the general public about Ukiah's heritage and how to protect sites and structures. Implementation Measure HA-8.1 (a): During the short-term planning period, make available informational brochures explaining the preservation process, renovation techniques, and the economic and cultural benefits of restoration. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Historic and Archaeological Review Committee] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County 4 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.4. Community Facilities'and Services 4, Page 1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES 4.01 Drinking water supply 4.01.01 Summary of major findings HERE ARE FIVE major providers of water services within the Ukiah Valley. The City of Ukiah is full-service and provides water to businesses and residences within the City limits. Outside of the City, water is provided to specific communities through three water districts and one private water company. The primary water source for all water providers in the valley is the Russian River with primary storage in Lake Mendocino. The Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control & Water Conservation Improvement District has the water rights to purchase and collect 21,000 acre feet of water from the river and wholesale it to the five water providers. Property owners without access to the City or one of the District systems obtain water from individual wells or springs. The City of Ukiah maintains its own treatment facility. The facility is regulated by the State of California. It is being improved to meet the 1993 Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Standards established by the U.S. and California Environmental Protection Agencies. Currently the City has the capacity to provide up to ten million gallons per day (mgd) of water to its customers. Peak summer demand is six mgd, 60 % of capacity. Within the Planning Area, three independent special districts -- Willow, Calpella and Millview -- serve the unincorporated areas. The Willow County Water District has a capacity of 4.4 mgd and a peak demand of approximately 2.0 mgd, 45 % of capacity. The Calpella County Water District has a capacity of .2 mgd and a peak demand of .09 mgd, 45 % of capacity. The Millview County Water District has a capacity of 3.4 mgd and a peak demand of 2.4 mgd, 71% of capacity. The Rogina Water Company is not a public agency. It operates under permit authority of the Mendocino County Health Department and the California Public Utilities Commission. The Company must also comply with State and Federal standards for clean and adequate water supplies. Currently this Company has the ability to provide 1.7 mgd and a peak demand of 1.4 mgd, 82% of capacity. Currently, each of the Valley's water providers meets existing demand and has capacity to grow. Eventually, however, the Valley's anticipated growth rate of two to three percent per anum will consume all existing available capacity. The most efficient, inexpensive and environmentally sensitive method of meeting anticipated demand increases is to expand existing water storage capacities and to develop mandatory and voluntary water conservation programs. Conservation through reduced-flow water fixtures, irrigation equipment, and other passive and active systems will reduce water demand. Reducing demand for water frees up capacity for new uses. Agriculture is economically and culturally important to the City and Valley. Agriculture requires large amounts of water for irrigation. In fact, purchasing water may be one of the largest costs related to agricultural production. If water costs become too high, it discourages agriculture and can greatly reduce the amount of land in agricultural production. In 1991, the City, County, and Valley Special Districts formed a task force to look for ways to increase the efficiency and reduce the costs of servicing the residents and businesses of the Ukiah Valley. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomla V.4. Community Facilities and Services ~, Page 2 The Task Force recognized that there are expensive improvements needed within the Valley but that revenues and operating incomes are fragmented. The Task Force proposed three recommendations related to water management in the Ukiah Valley. First, the Task Force recommended a reorganization of the Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District. The Task Force envisioned a seven member board (the current board has five members) elected by districts or zones in the Valley. The Task Force recommended that the RRFCD be given the responsibility of acting as the lead governmental agency for water management. Second, the Task Force recommended that the smaller districts -- Willow, Millview, and Calpella, as well as the Regina Water Company -- retain their separate and distinctive water rights and entitlements. The Task Force envisioned that the separate districts would continue to function as separate entities over the short term. However, the Task Force recommended that as financial constraints tightened, voters should be asked to consolidate the smaller agencies into a larger and more efficient district. The third recommendation of the Task Force called for the formation of an ongoing task force on water issues to meet regularly to coordinate water resource and supply development programs. The Task Force would also coordinate joint powers agreements between agencies for more efficient operations. 4.01.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CF-l: Maintain a safe and adequate water system to meet the needs of existing and projected development. Policy CF-I.I: Protect the "area of origin" and confirm all Russian River tributary water rights to which the Valley may be entitled. Implementation Measure CF-1.1 (a): Define and confirm the "area of origin" of the Russian River's waters. [Timeframe for completion: Immediate planning period e Measure applies to: City and County ,e, Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino County Water Agency, City and County Public Works Department, Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District, State Department of Water Resources] Implementation Measure CF-I.I(b): Determine water needs and demand for the end of the short-term, during the intermediate-term, and for the long-term planning period. [Timeframe for completion: Each identified planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District] Implementation Measure CF-1.1 (c): Coordinate with all land owners and land managers within the "area of origin" of the Russian River's waters to protect and enhance the quality and quantity of water flowing to the Russian River. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino County Water Agency, City and County Public Works Department] Implementation Measure CF-I.I (d): Coordinate with the Mendocino County Water Agency and area water purveyors to actively participate in hearings and actions involving water rights and distribution of area water. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoingplanning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,e, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Utilities, Mendocino County Water Agency, Board of Supervisors] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.4. Community Facilities and Services 4, ?age 3 Implementation Measure CF-I.I(e): Provide technical and political support to the Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District in its negotiations with the Sonoma County Water Agency and permitting to obtain its additional water supply in the Ukiah Valley water subbasin of the Russian River water basin. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning pedod 4~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors, Mendocino County Water Agency] Policy CF-I. 2: Protect and expand existing sources for water storage. Implementation Measure CF-1.2(a): Investigate expanding water storage capacity in Lake Mendocino, Lake Pillsbury, the Russian River, and its tributaries. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Mendocino County Water Agency, City Council, Board of Supervisors] Goal CF-2: Policy CF-2.1: Preserve water supplies for agriculture. Avoid actions and oppose measures which could increase the cost of water for agriculture. Implementation Measure CF-2.1 (a): To the extent possible, work to prevent actions that would reduce water supply or increase cost of water for agriculture. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino County Water Agency, Board of Supervisors] Goal CF-3: Promote water conservation. Policy CF-3.1: Actively develop programs to decrease the need for new water sources. Implementation Measure CF-3.1 (a): Promote water conservation to minimize the need for development of new water sources and to minimize sewer flows. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,t, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Utilities, Mendocino County Department of Building and Planning] Implementation Measure CF-3.1(b): Ensure that all public facilities are upgraded to "low flow" fixtures, timed irrigation systems, and other conservation measures. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Utilities, Mendocino County Administration/Buildings & Grounds] Implementation Measure CF-3.1(c): Require all private development to utilize "low flow" fixtures and other appropriate active and passive conservation programs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agen- cy/Department responsible: City Building Department, County Department of Planning and Building] Goal CF-4: Improve the City water distribution system. Policy CF-4.1: Work to avoid preventable water loss from the distribution system. Implementation Measure CF-4.1 (a): Monitor water flows through the City's water system to identify areas of potential water loss and make improvements in the systems as Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County, California V.4. Community Facilities and Services ~, Page 4 necessary. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ,e, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Utilities] Goal CF-5: Consolidate duplicate public services. Policy CF-5.1: Bring water suppliers together to create a Ukiah Valley Water Service Task Force which will look for areas in which duplicate services are provided and will recommended methods for terminating the duplication. Implementation Measure CF-5.1(a): Maintain and participate in a Ukiah Valley Water Task Force made up of representatives from each water agency in the Valley, including the Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District, the Farm Bureau, and other special districts in the Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Short planning period · Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure CF-5.1(b): To the extent possible, the Ukiah Valley Water Task Force will implement the 1991 Task Force recommendations. Work through the Local Agency Formation Commission to consolidate water providers. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~t, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] 4.02 Sewage disposal and wastewater treatment 4.02.01 Summary of major findings The City and County, as a special district board of director, owns the major sewage disposal system in the Ukiah Valley, the Ukiah Valley Sanitary District (UVSD). The City operates the sewage disposal facility for the district. UVSD services an area which extends into the unincorporated area. An upgrade of the facility which resulted in providing higher quality discharges was initiated in 1994. When completed, the sewage treatment facility will meet all State and Federal requirements for sewage treatment and discharge. Currently the sewer district has the capacity to process 2.8 million gallons per day (mgd) during dry weather and 7 mgd during wet weather. The plant has different capacities for dry and wet weather because the district is allowed to release treated water into the river during wet weather. During dry weather UVSD maintains all treated water in onsite ponds. The District uses approximately 2.3 mgd of their capacity during the dry season and all 7 mgd of their capacity during wet weather. The major reason for this difference in capacity used is due to ground water infiltration into the sewer pipes during wet weather. Many of the City's sewer pipes were installed when the system was first built, before 1900, and ground water seeps into them when the water table rises during the wet season. The District recently completed an engineering plan for an expansion to occur over the next 12 years. It expects to increase dry weather capacity to 3.4 mgpd. This is based on an assumption of the need to serve 1,000 new homes, given an assumed demand of 208 gpd per household. Many homes and businesses outside of the City and the Sanitary District's boundaries dispose of sewage through individual onsite septic systems. Although the technology of onsite systems has improved Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.4. Community Facilities and Services ~, Page 5 in recent years, Mendocino County's Environmental Health Division believes that many of these are older systems may be leaking septage into the groundwater system. Sewage treatment plants are very expensive to expand. Water conservation helps decrease the volume of water going into the facility thereby expanding the facilities' life and capacity. As demand increases for sewer plants to decrease their environmental impacts and expand their capacity, new technologies for sewage treatment and disposal become important. Sewage disposal facilities that release treated water into artificially created wetlands can provide a public service to the community and an enhancement of the environment. The Ukiah Valley, in order to continue growing, must maintain a sewer treatment and disposal facility which has adequate capacity and meets water quality and quantity discharge requirements. This will require maintenance of the existing facilities and planning for future growth. This can be ensured through development of a Capital Improvements Program which reflects these needs. In addition to the UVSD, the Calpella Water District also operates a sewage treatment facility with limited capacity serving the Calpella Rural Community and portions of the surrounding area. The Ukiah Valley Task Force was concerned about the extent of urban growth pressures in the Valley and outside of one of the two sanitation districts. The Task Force recommended that sewage treatment facilities and districts be consolidated into the UVSD. Additionally, the Task Force recommended that the current Ukiah Valley Sanitary District Board, which consist of the Board of Supervisors and City Council, be reorganized into an elected five member board representing various districts or zones within the Valley. Further, the Task Force recommended that the Sanitary District's sphere of influence be defined. Over the years, the UVSD has basically expanded "on demand" creating a boundary that meanders through the Valley and on both sides of the Russian River. The Task Force recommended that the District work with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to prepare a logical Sphere of Influence to include the urban growth areas defined in the General Plan. 4.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CF-6: Maintain quality sewage treatment and disposal services. Policy CF-6.1: Maintain an adequate level of service in the City's sewage collection, treatment and disposal system to meet the needs of existing and projected development and all State and Federal regulations. Implementation Measure CF-6.1 (a): Ensure that the sewage disposal system has adequate funds and programs for maintenance, upgrades when required, and day-to-day operations to properly serve the community now and in the future. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,e, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Utilities, City Council.,,---',., ,..,.,~ Implementation Measure CF-6.1 (o): Comply with all State and Federal regulations relating to treatment and storage methods and the quality of the final product. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Utilities, County Public Works, City Council, ~c,a:~ cf sanitation aoa~ of Directors] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Californi., V.4. Community Facilities and Services e Page 6 Goal CF-7: Protect groundwater quality through modern disposal. sewage Policy CF-7.1: Extend boundaries of the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District. Implementation Measure CF-7.1(a): Extend the boundaries of the Sanitation District and provide services to those urban areas of the Valley which have been documented as in need of sewer service as a means of protecting groundwater. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Intermediate-term planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: Sanitation Distdct ~, Agency/Department responsible: Sanitation Board of Directors (City Council and Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure CF-ZI(b): Development of individual septic systems shall be permitted in rural areas when the Sanitation District cannot feasibly provide sewer service. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedofl ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Planning Commission, Environmental Health] Implementation Measure CF-Z] (c): Work with the Local Agency Formation Commission to prepare a logical service area and sphere of influence for the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District that coincides with the urban development areas identified in the Land Use Element. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County as operators and administrators of the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Policy CF-7. 2: When possible implement new and innovative sewage treatment systems. Implementation Measure CF-7.2(a): Develop a treatment system that uses environmentally sensitive concepts to promote wetlands for bird/wildlife refuge and is accessible to the public. [Timeframe for completion: Long-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: Sanitation District ~ Agency/Department responsible: Sanitation District, City Utilities] 4.03 Public health and medical care 4.03.01 Summary of major findings gcmcoesidents Valley access to a broad variety of medical care including both the Ukiah have nventional and alternative health-care methodologies. It is to the benefit of the community to aintain and enhance this diversity of choice. Also located in the City are two hospitals, owned by Adventist Hospitals. Currently these hospitals operate at around 75 percent of capacity. No sizable increase in demand is expected to occur during the next twenty years. People with an inability to pay for private medical services may receive medical care through the County Health Department. Additionally, several non-profit organizations provide health care support and educational services to specific populations within the County (farmworkers, victims of domestic violence, as examples). The City and a private carrier provide ambulance services and public safety personnel with emergency medical training (EMT) to City residents. Fire districts in the unincorporated area have personnel with EMT certificates. The City's ambulances are used in the Valley for emergency transport through a mutual aid program. The Mendocino County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department and County Health Department provide training, emergency response planning, and other service related to public health Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah tl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.4. Community Facilities and Services 4, Page 7 emergencies. Participation by many of the public safety agencies in the Valley and County is coordinated through EMS. Additional emergency medical training can be coordinated and encouraged by the EMS through the use of local education programs, such as the Mendocino Community College. In 1991, prior to the City's involvement in emergency medical response and transportation, the Ukiah Valley Task Force expressed concern about the different ambulance companies and their varying styles and quality of care. The City's involvement has improved service to the Valley through standardization of the procedures from first response to hospital transfer. G 4.03.02 oal CF-8: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Maintain effective, fast, and dependable emergency medical response in the Valley. Policy CF-8.1: Coordinate emergency medical services between agencies. G Implementation Measure CF-8.1 (a): Achieve a coordinated response to incidents involving multiple agencies by developing a central dispatch for all Emergency Medical Response, Fire and Law Enforcement in the valley. [Timeframe for completion: Short- term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department respon- sible: City Public Safety, County Emergency Medical Services] Implementation Measure CF-8. I (b): Adopt a First Responders Medical Care ordinance to provide for pre-hospital transportation standards. [Timeframe for completion: Short- term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department respon- sible: City Public Safety Department, County Emergency Medical Services] Implementation Measure CF-8.1(c): Develop programs for the training, professional growth, and monitoring of standards for pre-hospital care personnel including EMT II and Paramedics. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Emergency Medical Services] oal CF-9: Promote good personal health. Policy CF-9.1: Help reduce public health costs through education and support programs that encourage personal knowledge of prevention and self-treatment of medical problems. Implementation Measure CF-9.1 (a): Promote and support organizations which are concerned with health issues and that provide information to citizens to educate themselves about these issues. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure ap- plies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] 1..^~.4 .... .4 ~--I. ....... I!..... I..nnl,l~ ........n .-inl:..n.... r't':___g_____ t ...... t-a:----, t'~----_;.. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ilJlr, Mendocino County, California V.4. Community Facilities and Services ~, Page 8 VIL~' V'tm/&dll'fl.,~llI UVUI~,.d VI vJ.,Jj./l~.l lrlg'q, slgj 4.04 Public facilities for the community 4.04.01 Summary of major findings The City has an extensive number of public and private facilities that are available for meetings and general public use. These range from conference rooms in local businesses, to space in educational facilities, to the City's Conference Center that opened in Table V,4-14: Sampling of Community meeting Downtown Ukiah in 1994. rooms The development of this General Plan has highlighted the need for public space as a method of encouraging and facilitating public involvement in community issues. It is more cost effective in terms of capital, operations, and maintenance costs to upgrade current facilities rather than build new competing facilities. As valley agencies expand their facilities opportunities, exist to provide for even more public meeting space. For example, if additional space is added to the airport, consideration could be given to including a meeting room. The majority of the existing meeting facilities are centralized in Downtown and the north end of Ukiah. While facilities are scattered throughout the Planning Area, the UkiahConfemnce center .::~::.' :::. '"::~.; '. ",-: ,up'to '900 .cafi:PurdYHalti:~ :::.~ i :: i:: i;:: !~.i: :i: : · 2;000 800 .: ::.: :: .: ·.... : · :.: :: . Frank Z~k:$O~OOl 380 Ukia h City iHall'' ::;~i.. ::i .: il :.'. :i :~::::~' :;: :.:; :::: :':': ::'. :~ :'" :' :"' ':-''' :'" :.:" :210 Mendocino' Community College up.to 400 MendocinoSavingsBank' ::'~:-':- .:.. : . . -.:-:. :.'.::::~:15,20 south end of the City and the area immediately south of the City limits lack adequate community meeting space. The only meeting room available to these areas is at the Ukiah Valley Fire District building on South State Street. Eventually, a free standing multi-purpose community meeting center for special events and com- munity functions could be an asset to the area. Such a facility could service multiple goals for the valley, including providing a community recreation center. 4.04.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CF-Il: Ensure adequate community meeting facilities. Policy CF-11.1:Develop or identify adequate and appropriate community facilities available for public meetings and cultural activities. Implementation Measure CF-11.I(a): Prepare and make accessible to the public a comprehensive inventory of available facilities in the community which are open for Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.4. CommunitY Facilities and Services 4, Page 9 use by public groups. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: CitY 4, Agency/Department responsible: Parks and Recreation, CommunitY Services] Implementation Measure CF-II.l(b): Develop a County/City/business network within the community to coordinate the use of existing facilities. [rimetrame tot completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: CitY 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Parks and Recreation, CommunitY Services] Policy CF-II. 2: Support the multiple use of facilities. Implementation Measure CF-11.2(a): As the community's needs grow and existing facility use is maximized, design, fund, construct, and develop a multi-purpose community center. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: CitY 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Parks and Recreation] 4.05 Public Education 4.05.01 Summary of major findings The Ukiah Unified School District services the Planning Area, providing classes from kindergarten through 12th grade. The District is made up of six elementary schools, two middle schools, one high school, and one continuation high school. The District is currently operating near capacity. The District's 1994 Developer Fee Justification Study Update states that the District's 1993-1994 student capacity was 6,750 students. During the '93-'94 school year the District had 6,747 students enrolled, three less than capacity. By implementing year-round education in two additional elementary schools (for a total of four year-round schools, the District will increase their total enrollment capacity to 7,000 students for the 1994-1995 school year. Even with this increase in capacity, the District is projecting enrollment will begin to exceed capacity in '94?95. Because the Ukiah Valley is experiencing Table V.4-15: Valley Schools growth and is expected to continue to grow during the life of this General Plan, the discrepancy between enrollment and capacity is expected to worsen every year until additional capacity is added to the District. The Developer Fee Justification Study Update assumes that capacity can only be added through con- stmction of additional structures. The impact cost per square foot of new residential construction within the district is estimated at $5.39. Currently, the State's fee is set at $1.72 per square foot for new residential construction which creates a shortfall of $3.67 for full mitigation. The District may negotiate with the Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California V.4. Community Facilities and Services ~, Page 10 developers of specific projects, on a project-by-project basis, to receive compensation which more accurately reflects the proposed development's impact on District facilities. The City and County governments can help the District to provide the educational facilities necessary to accommodate enrollment growth over the life of the General Plan by supporting the District's efforts to obtain funding. Additionally, the environmental document for any project having the potential to increase student enrollment within the District should be referred to the District for their review and comment. If, as a responsible agency, the District determines that a project has the potential to significantly impact them, they can require appropriate mitigation measures. Also located within the Ukiah Valley is Mendocino College. Mendocino College is part of the State's Community College system. The campus is located outside of both the city limits and sphere of influence of Ukiah. The College offers three semesters of classes each year and services approximately 6,000 students, the majority of whom attend part time. The College benefits the area by sponsoring social and cultural events, helping to train people for work within the local job market, and by providing a local opportunity for higher education. G 4.05.02 oal CF-12: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Ensure adequate public school facilities necessary to sustain a quality learning environment as the population of the Planning Area increases. Poffcy CF-I2.1:Support the efforts of the Ukiah Unified School District to provide adequate educational facilities for the Planning Area's increasing youth population. Implementation Measure CF-12.1(a): The Ukiah City Council and the Mendocino Board of Supervisors shall work with the Ukiah Unified School District to obtain funding to provide additional facilities necessary to accommodate projected enrollment. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period ~t, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Policy CF-12.2: Consider potential impacts on the Ukiah Unified School District during the review of discretionary projects. Implementation Measure CF-12.2(a): The environmental document for all discretionary projects which have the potential to impact the Ukiah Unified School District shall be referred to the District as a Responsible Agency under CEQA for review and comment. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CF-I2.2(b): City and County staff will work with District staff to negotiate appropriate mitigation measures for any project which has the potential to significantly negatively impact the District. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period ,I, Measure applies to: City and County ,l, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementan'on Measure CF-12.2(c): Where a project has a significant negative impact on the District's capacity to accommodate the resulting enrollment growth, the City and County will condition project approval subject to agreed mitigation measures between the developer and the District. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ilJli, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.4. Community Facilities and Services 4, Page ! 1 period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Policy CF-I2.3: Coordinate public schools with community facilities and land uses. Implementation Measure CF-12.3(a): Working with the School Districts, attempt to utilize accepted planning practices to determine appropriate future school sites to be compatible with the character of neighborhoods.. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure CF-12.3(b): Locate schools in coordination with transportation and land use plans, avoid highly trafficked areas and facilitate use of community parks and other public facilities by schools. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] Goal CF-13: Poffcy CF-13.1: Maintain Mendocino College within the Ukiah Valley. Support the presence of Mendocino College within the Ukiah Valley. Implementation Measure CF-13.1(a): Work with staff from the College to keep the State aware of the importance of maintaining Mendocino College within the Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council and Board of Supervisors] 4.06 Cemetery District 4.06.01 Summary of major findings The Russian River Cemetery District operates a 47-acre burial ground on Low Gap Road in Ukiah. Sixty-three percent of the land, 30 of the 47 acres, is in use. The plot density of the cemetery is 1,200 plots per acre. The cemetery has "life span" to meet Valley burial needs for well beyond the long-term planning period. 4.06.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CF-14: Support the growing needs of the cemetery district. Policy CF-14.1: Work with the District to accomplish its long-term goals. Implementation Measure CF-14.1 (a): The City and County shall be responsive to the needs of the Russian River Cemetery District in terms of protecting its lands and future sites from incompatible development. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 1 5 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION HE CIRCULATION ELEMENT IS ONE of the seven mandatory General Plan elements. First required in 1955, the Circulation Element is the oldest of California's planning requirements. The Element is an infrastructure plan that focuses on the "...circulation of people, goods, energy, water, sewage, storm drainage, and communications through the City. ''~ Although all elements of the General Plan have equal weight, the Circulation Ele- ment's relationship to the Land Use Element is one of the most important in terms of General Plan con- sistency standards. The relationship between these two elements has been the subject of some of the most significant General Plan court rulings. The Ukiah Circulation and Transportation Element addresses the street and transportation network with its emphasis on the movement of people and products. The infrastructure related to utilities, communications, and storm drainage is addressed in the Open Space and Conservation Element. Energy issues are addressed in the Energy Element. Dependence upon the automobile contributes to the deterioration of air quality in the Ukiah Valley. Air quality issues must be considered a significant part of transportation planning. For specific policies related to air quality issues, see the Open Space and Conservation Element. The system of streets and roads that is the outcome of the Circulation and Transportation Element influences the patterns of land use in the Ukiah Valley. Settlement patterns throughout the history of the area have been based on movement of people and products. How this network is developed has impacts on air quality, plant and animal habitat, noise, energy consumption, and the locations of future homes and businesses. The economic well-being of the area requires movement of materials, products, ideas, and information from one point to another. The Circulation and Transportation Element -- in conjunction with other General Plan elements -- addresses a comprehensive infrastructure. It deals with the economic backbone of the area in making sure that people and products connect -- whether by vehicle, computer, telephone, power line, or pipeline. The circulation system serves all members of the community. It is an integral part of the Valley's social fabric linking friends to friends, people to jobs, homes to shopping, businesses to supplies, and families to entertainment. The ability to get from one place to the next is a major ingredient of the quality of life in the Ukiah area. 5. Of The role of transportation issues in project review 5.01.01 Summary of major findings Asthe City grows more growth occurs unincorporated Valley, an and the Ukiah the need for efficient transportation system that can carry existing and future traffic is of crucial importance. One means of increasing the capacity of the existing system is to consider all forms of trans- portation when making circulation network-related land use decisions. Planning that respects the small town quality of life in Ukiah will retain the intimacy of streets that attract pedestrian usage. Maintaining a balance between the various options to vehicular access during the planning process ensures that getting from home to work, shop, or play is convenient and easy without the automatic need for a car. ~General Plan Guidelines, p. 82. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, Califomia ,, Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 2 The cost of road improvements that serve both specific projects as well as general traffic needs is one of the most expensive components of development. As the Valley has grown, there has been a tendency to reduce or even avoid road improvement requirements on new subdivisions and other projects because of the cost burden. In a growing California rural community, this is not unusual. Additionally, local Valley government has had a hard time visualizing what type and style of road improvements would be needed in an area that is just beginning to be developed. Very little attention has been paid to the need to include bikeways, pedestrian access, and varieties of public transit in newly developing areas. Many times, local governments assume that when the need occurs, the financing will fall into place. Prior to the adoption of the California Tax Reform Initiative (commonly called "Proposition 13"), it was possible to quickly and easily pass a bond measure, special tax, or other financing mechanism to pay for needed improvements. When Proposition 13 prohibited the public financing flexibility, many local communities were faced with a dual problem. First, some basically "raw land" subdivisions were beginning to develop, only now no means of generating the funds to improve the roads existed. Secondly, it was difficult to anticipate when the need for improvements would take place. Local governments hoped that as time passed, the California legislature would provide opportunities to finance needed infrastructure. In fact, what has occurred since 1978 is fewer opportunities for financing local infrastructure costs. Banking on future improvements has caused, in some por- tions of the Planning Area, street capacities to be reached during certain times of the day. Other neighborhoods have connecting streets in a less than congruous pattern, resulting in through traffic being forced into residential areas. Prior programs of installing traffic signs on a "by request" basis has created traffic flows which are not smooth. Recent road improvements attempt to counterbalance the lack of future capacity through a program of wide streets which may inappropriately encourage higher speeds and remove trees or natural area landscaping that enhance much of the area's rural character. The Circulation and Transportation Element is intended to provide long-term traffic solutions while maintaining the area's friendly, small scale char- acter. The need is to accommodate an ever-increasing volume of traffic without forcing private developers, the City, or the County into expensive road improvements. Non-traditional approaches to increasing capacity should be considered as a part of the planning process prior to undertaking expensive and urban- appearing street improvements. Simply accommodating cars first and looking for alternatives afterwards short changes opportunities for alternate transportation and a more spontaneous, diverse, and lively community. Air quality, land use, and circulation are closely interrelated. A commitment to reducing the primacy of the automobile is a key to effective transportation planning and will make the most of current capacities. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. cirCulation and Transportation 4, Page 3 Methods of improving traffic flows, changing locations and types of stop signs, traffic signals, and other hindrances to free traffic flow can help increase the capacity of intersections and street segments. Routing traffic to avoid conflicts with free flow through con- trolled access, shared driveways, and separation of bicycle lanes from traffic provide opportunities to more safely and efficiently move traffic through the Planning Area. Real alternatives, so that Valley residents and visitors can select from a variety of transportation modes, are needed in the Ukiah Valley. Alternative transportation methods may be selected for health or safety reasons, for convenience or necessity, for social reasons, or for just plain fun. Creative, responsible transportation planning requires the involvement of the community. This Plan envisions that the City and County will be proactive in developing and modeling parallel forms of transportation and fully encourage citizen participation in the process. An appealing, safe, system of connected and direct paths for bicycles and pedestrians are to be developed during the life of the General Plan in order to reduce the negative impacts associated with transportation -- such as the use of non- renewable resources, creation of stormwater and air pollution, and traffic congestion. Developments with cul-de-sacs and greenbelts can include a separate network of bicycle and walking paths avoiding streets and traffic conflicts. The attractiveness, safety, and directness of a separate network encourages people to leave their cars at home and use alternate transportation. G 5.01.02 oal CT-l: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Consider all types of circulation and transportation issues in land use decisions. Policy CT-1.1: Land use entitlements shall be based on the classification2 and capacity of the street or road providing primary access? 2Street classifications: Freeway, arterial, collector, residential, and rural are defined later in the Circulation Element. In addition, the capacity of a road to move a volume of traffic is also defined in that section. 3Primary access means the actual road from which traffic entering a parcel will turn into the driveway or parking lot from a public street or road. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah/1~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and TransPortation e Page 4 Implementation Measure CT-I.1 (a): Population density and building intensity~ entitlements of the Land Use map shall be based on the classification of the street from which access to a parcel shall be derived. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · , Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department] Implementation Measure CT-I. 1 (b): Approval of land use entitlements shall be conditioned upon an integrated circulation system which fully takes into account the efficient use of autos, transit, bicycles, and walking and: (a) an existing capacity which will not be exceeded by the proposed project; or (b) a time specific commitment by the proponent to construct improvements necessary to provide the capacity needed to serve the proposed project; or (c) a time specific commitment by the proponent to contribute the project's fair share to the cost of improving access to provide as a minimum standard the capacity needed to serve the proposed project as a minimum road improvement standard. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~t, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department] Policy CT-I.2: City and County Staff shall include traffic and circulation information in staff reports to their respective Planning Commissions. Implementation Measure C~-I.2(a): Among the environmental issues assessed for all discretionary projects, the City and County Staffs shall include an analysis of a project's traffic and circulation impacts and present recommended findings in written staff reports. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Department responsible: City & County Planning] Policy C~-I.3: All proposed development5 shall be reviewed for its immediate and cumulative transportation impacts. Implementation Measure CT-1.3(a): The City and County shall ensure that any impact fee programs are designed to fairly apportion Development Impact fees. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department] Implementation Measure CT-1.3(b): Impact fees, if charged, may be utilized to fund all types of transportation projects -- including those which n,Population density and building intensity" is a combined term that will be used extensively in the Circulation and Land Use elements. The terms are required as a result of major General Plan litigation. Population density means the number of persons per acre or unit of land area. Building intensity means the number of dwelling units or developed structures per acre or unit of land area. For non-residential projects, the intensity tends to be reflected as "lot coverage" or "floor area ratio." These terms will be defined in the land use element. 5"Development' means the improvement of land for the purposes of accommodating land use. "Proposed development" means the act of approving a land use entitlement such as -- and not limited to -- a building permit for any new construction that generates traffic, tentative subdivision, minor subdivision or parcel map, conditional use permit, planned development permit, or site development permit. The term proposed development does not apply to a building permit for one single family home proposed on an undeveloped existing parcel with a density permitting one single family residence. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ,e, Page 5 Goal CT-2: Policy CT-2. I' reduce the use of vehicles with only one occupant. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Public Works] Maximize the use of existing streets and circulation patterns. Avoid premature widening by seeking other methods of increasing capacity on existing street or road sections segments. Implementation Measure CT-2.1 (a): During the short-term planning period, complete a traffic study to make recommendations ~:~- "- ...... c ..... ~.___:~~., ._A~.~ ~:__~,~ ~ .__ ---' ............ '~"' "'-- ' .... for the purpose of increasing traffic capacity and improving level of service on Planning Area roads. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: C~ and County ,~ Agency/Department re- sponsible: City and County Public Works] Implementation Measure CT-2.1 (b): Prior to allocating capital funds for individual road widening projects, require a traffic study for the area proposed for widening to determine the relative merits of · ,- v ....... alternatives that would increase traffic capacities. If there are one or more alternatives that would increase traffic capacities or improve levels of service without widening the road they shall be implemented. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works] Implementation Measure C~-2. I (c): Consider the use of one-way street couplets6 to improve traffic flows on the existing street system. [T/meframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City and County Public Works] Policy CT-2.2: Encourage development along existing roads with aScqur.:c available capacity and appropriate ~ning prior to locating development in areas which require new transportation facilities. Implementation Measure CT-2.2(a): In assigning population density and building intensity in the Land Use Element, ensure that the higher densities and intensities are located on roads with existing capacity prior to increasing density and intensity on roads that would require new transportation facilities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department] Policy CT-2.3: Encourage new mixed use along High Intensity Development Corridors7 (HIDC). Implementation Measure CT-2.3(a): The following corridors are to be considered HIDCs for purposes of working with the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District, Mendocino Transit, Authority, City, and County for purposes of creating development designed to support alternative transportation and reduce reliance on 6Street couplets are pairs of one-way streets that combined serve as a two-way street. Standley and Perkins are a one-way couplet. 7'HIDC"s are areas within the City where high intensity development -- multi-family, commercial, and industrial development occurs. Primarily it refers to State Street and other major collectors and arterials. HIDCs also comprise most transit corridors. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 6 Goal CT-3: single occupancy vehicles. HIDCs are defined as State Street, Dora Street, Washington Street, Standley Street, Talmage Road, and Perkins Streets in the City and Sphere of Influence, and North State in the Planning Area. [Timeframe forcomple- lion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: Planning Department, County Department of Planning and Building] ~ new development and-in-the redevelopment t~sa'iet-stmtt proj~ to be as accessible by foot, bicycle, and transit as they are by auto. Policy C~-3.1' New development and Redevelopment projects shall specifically include plans for pedestrian facilities, bike lanes, and transit stops. Implementation Measure CT-3.1 (a): Working with the Mendocino Transit Authority and other appropriate agencies, the City and County shall include in the Land Development Code a menu of options to facilitate and encourage alternate modes of travel and transportation. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal CT-4: Provide for needed rights-of-way and resolve other traffic impacts from devel- opment. Policy CT-4.1: Acquire rights-of-way for transportation and circulation as a condition of project entitlements. Implementation Measure CT-4.1(a): Require an offer of rights-of-way dedication as a condition of project approval. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,e Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department. County Planning and Building Department] Implementation Measure CT-4.1 (b): Require that offered right-of-way include adequate width and land area to accommodate all forms of transportation, not merely roadway cross-sections. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,) Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Planning and Building Department] Implementation Measure CT-4.1 (c): Acquisition of rights-of-way shall be directly related to the proposed project. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] 8California law says that when a City or County requires acquisition of right-of-way not under the control of the project proponent -- and if the proponent cannot voluntarily acquire the property in question -- that the City or County will undertake an action of eminent domain to acquire the right-of-way. The proponent is responsible -- by state law -- for the full costs of the condemnation. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Goal CT-5: V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 7 Maintain an ongoing periodic evaluation process to inventory traffic and other circulation needs. Policy CT-5.1: Conduct traffic studies in association with required updates to the Regional Transportation Plan to update the General Plan and appropriately update and amend the Circulation and Transportation Element. Implementation Measure C~-5.1 (a): The traffic studies shall, at a minimum, assess the need to provide additional future roadway width based on the long-term projected traffic, _~A.,. __., ,, ..... ~. ~n- bicycle paths, and pedestrian access ~. [Time- transit, ..,.,.,,o, ,,, ....... ,.~ .... frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-5.1(b): Use the results of the traffic studies to update the Circulation and Transportation Element of the General Plan as appropriate. [T/me- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-5.1(c)' Revise the projected road right-of-way needs upon completion of each review and update of the Circulation and Transportation Ele- ment. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Policy CT-5.2: Develop a system for evaluating other forms of transportation within the Valley. Implementation Measure CT-5.2(a): Revise the projected alternative transportation right-of- way needs upon completion of each element review and update of the Circulation and Transportation Element. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-5.2(b): The periodic studies shall include an analysis of how people are moving from one point to another and by what transportation mode. The results of this analysis will be used by the City and County planners to provide adequate, safe alternative transportation routes. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-5.2(c): During the short-term planning period with cooperation and funding by the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District, help prevent unacceptable pollution levels by developing a system to evaluate alternative transportation infrastructure needs. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Mendocino Air Quality Management District. City and County Planning] Implementation Measure CT-5.2(d): The City and County shall work with the Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG) to develop and prepare an internodal computer travel model. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 8 5.02 Alternative modes of transportation 5.02.01 Summary of major findings Since our society relies almost exclusively on the use of single occupant vehicles for transportation, thirty to forty percent of all land in urban areas must typically be dedicated to autos, streets and parking.9 Acquisition of land for new streets and widening of existing streets is expensive. The proliferation of individual vehicles also creates noise and many forms of pollution. Developing bicycle and pedestrian paths as an attractive, integrated part of the transportation system can enhance the quality of life in the City and County. Easy to use paths, with convenient secured bicycle parking, and safe travel ways will encourage people to use bikes or walk on short trips and errands. A bicycle and pedestrian transportation system can be combined for both transportation and recreational purposes. Recreational bicycle use is addressed in the Parks and Recreation Element. Other transportation alternatives include car pools, ride-sharing, increased use of public transportation, or other methods of multiple persons using the same vehicle. Encouraging alternatives to single-user vehicles delivers a number of benefits to the Valley. First, fewer vehicles on the road reduces the vehicle emissions helps to maintain air quality. Second, the need for road widening or other road imp d by I ning g ":-*" ......... '"-- ~' .... " .... '~ '~' ........ ,:-- rovements may be deferre esse con estion The Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA) provides a local and county-wide bus transit service. Currently, a fixed route service is provided within the City of Ukiah and to other Mendocino County communities. MTA also operates a Dial-a-ride service. The service runs as a "taxi" seven days a week and serves the entire Ukiah area. Other limited regional transit service is offered by such carriers as Greyhound, Santa Rosa Airporter and Amtrak's feeder bus with connections to San Francisco and Eureka. Improving the safety, location, and appearance of pedestrian access can increase and encourage walking for short errands. Sidewalks with shade in the summer cut down the blast of heat off the pavement. Separating pedestrian paths from the street with landscaping or even a bicycle lane or parking provide walkers with a greater sense of safety. Walking can be encouraged through providing a pedestrian 9Steve Nadis and James J. MacKenzie, Car Trouble (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1993), p. 12. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 9 path network connecting residential neighborhoods to each other and commercial areas, as well as providing shortcuts even when not interconnected by streets. The Ukiah Unified School District operates school busses throughout the Planning Area. Although the busses transport students to public schools, the transit mode is not technically considered public transit. However, new residential development, design needs to consider convenient, safe locations for pick-up and drop-off of school children. Although electric or natural gas vehicles are not an alternative mode of transportation, but rather an alternative fuel source, by the year 1998, California will require that the total vehicle sales by each motor vehicle manufacturer include a minimum percentage of zero emission vehicles. Although a minimum of three percent was set in state law, the number may be changed as a result of pending litigation. Policies related to alternative fuels are in the Energy Element, Chapter IV.4 of the General Plan. 5.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CT-6: Increase the use of bicycle transportation. Policy CT-6.1: Work with the Mendocino Council of Governments to develop a safe and integrated circulation system of routes for bicycle transportation. Implementation Measure 6~-6.1(a): Utilize the Land Development Code to ensure that there is secure and safe parking for bicycles in new parking facilities. [timeframe tot com- pletion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure L~-6. I (b): Develop incentives to encourage retrofitting parking lots for bicycle parking. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,t, Measure ap- plies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, '"..,...,,-' '-,,~ " · ~.~,,,~,,'~ · ': "~ :-- ,~ .., --'~ ,.. P',ann~r,~ ~.~..,, ~' ........ ,,, ,~, ,., Me~~ coun~l ~em~nts OtiMendodno ~unty ~r QUal~ Managemem District] Implementation Measure CT-6.1 (c): During routine street cleaning and maintenance, ensure that bicycle lanes -- when developed, signed, or striped -- are maintained for safe usage. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-6.1 (d): During the short-term planning period, work with local civic groups to create an "Adopt-a-Bikelane' program. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~t, Measure applies to: City and County ~l, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Policy C~-6. 2: Promote the use of bicycles as a viable and attractive alternative to cars. Implementation Measure CT-6.2(a): During the short-term planning period for incorporation into the five year update, develop a plan to extend a system of bicycle lanes and ............ ,.A ,-:.. and important locations in the Planning Area. pathways t,, all ......... f .....,j '[Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ,l, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-6.2(b): Provide incentives and technical support to encourage employers to provide convenient, safe, and secure bicycle parking at places of Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 10 employment. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and Cc, unty ~.~,~,,,,,-.,,,~' ......... -,,' ,~',&r;,~,g -.,,,. -.,.,,..,,,~'"' "-- Me0~ Gounca'l 0f Govem~nts or M~no ~OU~'Nr Q~li~ Man~e~nt. Pistri~] Policy CT-6. 3: Provide bicycle lanes or paths along major streets. Implementation Measure CT-6.3(a): Require that streets linking residential areas with school facilities and shopping areas be designed to include bicycle lanes. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-6. 3(b): Consider bicycle operating characteristics in the design of intersections and traffic control systems and include appropriate features in intersection design standards. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Policy CT-6.4: Promote safe bicycle usage. Implementation Measure CT-6.4(a): Through the Public Safety Department, maintain an educational program promoting bicycle use and bicycle safety. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Department of Public Safety and County Sheriff] Implementation Measure CT-6. 4(b): Enforce bicycle safety regulations. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Department of Public Safety and County Sheriff] Goal CT-7: Develop pedestrian access. Policy C~-7.1: Treat pedestrian access as an integrated part of all road improvements within the City and within urbanized development areas of the County. Implementation Measure CT-7.1(a): Utilize incentive programs to encourage attractive pedestrian access to all developed areas. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-ZI(b): Pedestrian walkways shall be integrated and designed to provide direct access between areas. [Timeframe tot completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure C~-7.1 (c): Pedestrian access standards in the Land Development Code shall require sidewalks or paths to be separated from auto travel lanes by an appropriate combination of grade separations, parking lanes, or landscaping. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-ZI(d): Pedestrian access shall be accessible to the handicapped with appropriate curb cuts, grades, and ramps. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 11 Implementation Measure CT-7.1 (e): Pedestrian access design standards shall be included in the Land Development Code. The following will be considered within the Code: landscaped areas, tree shading when appropriate, and consider standards to utilize other streetscape amenities, such as lighting and litter baskets. [Timeframe forcomple- lion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Goal CT-8: Policy C~-8.1: Encourage increased use of public transportation. Make it easier to utilize bus service. Implementation Measure CT-8.1(a): Allow the use of City or County rights-of-way for on-street bus stops and passenger amenities such as benches and shelters. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure C~-8.1 (b): Request the Mendocino Transit Authority to assess the feasibility of new bus routes serving new development areas. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period ,S, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-8.1(c): During the short-term planning period, work with the Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA) to create a program that will provide opportunities for developers to notify buyers/renters of transit routes, plans, and programs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-8. I(d): The City and County shall work with MTA and Caltrans to ensure that project design maximizes potential sources of transit patrc, nag¢ ridersh~ through the use of shelters, passengers amenities, and service schedules. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,~ Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-8.1(e): Encourage the MTA and other public transportation providers to make bus routes connecting Ukiah with other areas bicycle accessible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County · , Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Imple entation Measure CT-8 1 09 Support --- rn . : ,,,,,1,..,,,,,,I,,, ~TA fotf~e~:.fUnds. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · , Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure CT-8.1 (g): Work through Mendocino Council of Governments to develop programs designed to increase MTA rldcr$1,1p. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 12 Goal CT-9: Ongoing ~nning ~riod Measure appliesto: Ci~ and ~Unty Agency~pa~nt re- sponsible:~City council and Boa~ of supervisors] Maximize the use of public transportation through efficient land use patterns and supporting incentive programs. Policy CT-9. I: Include design features in new commercial and residential areas that make public transportation convenient. Implementation Measure C~-9.1 (a): Ensure that design standards include provisions for safe, convenient bus stop locations and pull outs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-9.1 (b): As part of project review for new development, seek comments and recommendations from the Mendocino Transit Authority concerning the agency's needs to better serve the project. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-9.1(c): As part of project review for new development, seek comments and recommendations from the Ukiah Unified School District conceming the District's needs to ensure that project design accommodates school bus needs, if applicable. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-9.1 (d): No mitigation measures or project conditions shall exceed the direct relationship between the economic cost of the requirement measured against the project's actual impact. The rational nexus standard shall be utilized. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Policy CT-9.2: Support a strategy to provide funding and incentives to increase ridership opportunities. Implementation Measure CT-9.2(a): Develop an overall strategy to mitigate traffic and air quality impacts from new development which cannot directly be served by public transit. Consider a range of alternatives designed to encourage people to use alternatives to the automobile. These programs may include, and are not limited to, incentives for public transit ridership, or construction of nearby or convenient bus stops. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 13 Goal CT-10: Maximize opportunities for efficient transportation patterns through devel- opment of integrated Ukiah Valley transportation corridors. Policy ET-10. I: The City shall help to define the Ukiah Valley transportation corridors. Implementation Measure CT-IO.I(a): Work with Mendocino Council of Governments, Mendocino Transit Authority, Northwestern Pacific Railroad, and other agencies to help define and develop integrated transportation corridors. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~I, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Policy ET-10. 2: Facilitate development of Ukiah Valley transportation corridor integrating US 101, major arterials, rail, air, and public transportation.. Implementation Measure ET-IO. 2(a): Working with the North Coast Railroad Authority, the Mendocino Council of Governments, the Mendocino Transit Authority, and other interested agencies or organizations, develop design standards that specifically facilitate transit use and transportation systems along transportation corridor. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ,e, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-IO. 2(b): Using the discretion assigned to the City or County Planning Commission, review large or unique development proposals to ensure that there are measures incorporated in project approvals to support transit corridor concepts. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Policy CT-lO. 3:Maximize the efficient use of transportation facilities within and adjacent to the corridor through the land use planning process. Implementation Measure ET-IO. 3(a): Incorporate into the Land Development code zoning and development standards which locate higher density and intense development proximate to the corridor. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Mea- sure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Policy ET-lO. 4: Fully develop and utilize public and rail transit within the transportation corridor. Implementation Measure ET-IO. 4(a): Working with the Mendocino Council of Governments, ensure that the Regional Transportation Plan reflects the City's public and rail transit needs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County · Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Policy ET-lO. 5: Support creation of a Downtown Transit Center. Implementation Measure ET-IO. 5(a): Work with the MTA and other parties to develop a downtown transit center. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Mea- sure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 14 Goal CT-11: Encourage increased use of car- or van-pooling. Policy CT-II. I: Implement programs to increase car-pooling. Implementation Measure CT-II. 1 (a): Through the Mendocino Transit Authority, Council of Governments (MCOG) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) develop a van- and car-pool parking facilities or programs. [Timeframe for completion: Short- to intermediate-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agen- cy/Department responsible: City ar;,d Cc.,~;~,'y Public Works Departments, MCOG], Implementation Measure CT-11.1 (b): Identify locations for van- or car-pool Park and Ride facilities. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate planning period ,1~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City c.,';d Cc. ur;,'y Public Works Departments, MCOG] Implementation Measure CT-II.I(c)' Work to develop a program of incentives -- such as preferential van- and car-pool parking at employment sites, to increase the use of car- or van-pooling to reduce the number of single occupant vehicles on area roads. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~t, Agency/Department responsible: City &,';d C;u~,'y Public Works Departments, MCOG or AQMD] 5.03 Parking 5.03.01 Summary of major findings Along-recognized toCity's transportation system and economic development is the issue related the perception of a lack of convenient parking downtown -- both in number of spaces and location of parking lots. There are a number of potential solutions. Downtown Ukiah's narrow streets and heavy through traffic results in conflicts among shoppers seeking onstreet parking spaces, delivery vehicles, through traffic, and vehicles moving into or out of parking spaces. Opportunities include the use of dedicated access lanes that would direct traffic to and from off-street parking on one-way streets. Another option that needs examination is the consolidation of parking lots to increase available spaces as was accomplished with the parking facilities on Main Street. While the need for more parking is important, the aesthetics of maintaining the City's tree canopy must be a part of planning any parking facilities. The option of providing trade-offs or incentives for encouraging non-vehicle use against the need for parking can be considered part of the development process. Another issue with Downtown parking is the contest between employee parking and customer parking. With the City parking facilities being located "distant" from major downtown office and retail facilities, employees arriving early tend to select convenient parking spaces for their vehicles -- even though the car will be parked until lunch or even through the entire day. Long-term parking needs to be established at the "furthest most" parking spaces so that Downtown clients and customers can park closer to the places of business. If Downtown parking is more convenient for customers, Downtown businesses could experience improved customer traffic. Parking in areas other than Downtown is less dependent on onstreet spaces. This is a result of the on-site (off-street) parking facilities becoming standard fare for new development. Parking requirements were initially developed utilizing "accepted standards" without regard for local parking demand. Although there are intermittent times during the year when a store's parking lot may be overloaded, most of the time local parking lots have space available. With the preparation of a new land development code, the City Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah/lJli Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 15 and County shall re-evaluate current parking standards. Onsite parking has not been a problem to date, and new regulations should ensure that it does not become a problem in the future. Opportunities for parking lot improvement lie with the design of parking facilities. Most parking lots are designed as a complete overcovering of the ground with asphalt, concrete, or other impervious surface. As development continues in the Valley, the cumulative effect of the impervious surfaces may result in storm water runoff problems, increases in local temperatures, and a loss of natural beauty. While aspects of design are detailed in the Community Design Element in Section VI.B., the Circulation and Transportation Element provides additional policy support by looking how parking lot design and amenities can contribute to better circulation. Parking requirements need to include space for secure bicycle parking. The typical pair of "straight-in/straight-out" parking spaces require nearly six hundred square feet of paved land area. This means that a parking lot with as few as ten parking spaces when combined with the street access results in paving an area the size of a typical single family residential parcel (7,000 square feet). This is the approximate parking requirement for a commercial structure of only 2,500 square feet. Alternative layouts can reduce the required paving area. Large expanses of parking create a hostile setting that may deter people from walking by creating a perception of long distances between buildings. Creative parking lot design will assist in retaining the small town character and people-oriented charm of Ukiah and its downtown. 5.03.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CT-12: Increase the convenience and attractiveness of off-street parking. Policy C~-12.1' Eliminate on-street parking along aplYtOl~a~ segments of City arterial streets where appropriate. Implementation Measure CT-12.1 (a): By the end of the intermediate-term planning period, create adequate off-street parking in order to reduce or eliminate on-street parking from apprc, pr-:at¢ segments of City streets classified as arterials as identified in the Downtown Master Plan. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate planning period 4, Moa- sure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Redevelopment Agency] Policy CT-I2.2: Define alternatives to on-street parking. Implementation Measure CT-12.2(a): Study the potential of increasing parking using the guidance of the Downtown Master Plan. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate plann- ing period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Redevelopment Agency] Goal CT-13: Policy E~-13. I' Design attractive parking facilities. Utilize landscaping and other amenities to improve the appearance and traffic patterns of onsite parking facilities. A .... :A,,.., ....... ,.:__ "AA:~:.:~ Implementation Measure C~-13.1 (a): In the Land Development Code include requirements for parking lot landscaping that encourage the use of landscaping to provide a plant- based separation between parking and parcel lines, and to ensure that there are shade trees in the aisles of large parking lots. The Land Development Code shall define more precise standards designed to implement these guidelines and still Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 16 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California , , ensure developer flexibility. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] GoalCT-14: Minimize employee use of prime downtown customer parking spaces. Policy CT-I4.1: Develop a system for downtown employee parking that ensures convenient customer parking. Implementation Measure CT-I4.1(a): Provide incentives to employers .... '- ....... ':-- ...... ..,. 1.: .... 1~ ~:l:d-: ......d. :· .......... 1 : .... ~ :d.-- ~-- ~" ...... encourage employees to use off-street parking spaces in order to retain convenient spaces for Downtown business' customers and clients. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Redevelopment Agency] Policy CT-14. 2: Minimize the need for and expenses of off-street parking by encouraging alternates to single-occupant vehicles. Implementation Measure C~-14.2(a): To facilitate the shift from on-street to off-street park- ing, encourage employers and businesses to provide incentive for employees and customers to utilize alternate transportation modes. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City ~ Agency/Departmentresponsible: Redevelopment Agency] Policy CT-I4.3: Encourage a program to inform prospective and seated jurors of alternatives to on- street parking. Implementation Measure CT-14.3(a): Work with the Clerk of the Superior Court to provide maps of downtown parking and transit information, to be distributed to prospective jurors, so that on-street parking spaces are not filled with "all-day" jurors. [Time- frame for completion: Intermediate planning period ~, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: Redevelopment Agency] 5.04 Rail transportation 5.04.01 Summary of major findings The train was extended to Ukiah in 1889, which changed the economy of the area by opening markets for the City and the timber industry. Current passenger rail service and freight service are provided by Northwest Pacific and Eureka Southern Railroads. On June 1, 1990, representatives from the Golden Gate Bridge District signed a purchase agreement for the acquisition of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way from its owner, Southern Pacific. This right-of-way will be used as part of a solution to long range transportation problems in the Golden Gate corridor. The 151 miles of track extends from San Rafael to Willits. The total cost of the right-of-way is $37 million, to be purchased in phases. The final miles of track from Healdsburg to Willits will be purchased within four years. Making the rail-transit link an effective part of the transportation corridor between the Ukiah area and the Bay area is important to the success of long-term economic growth of the area. Rail transit offers the potential of providing more comfortable and expedient alternatives for people and products to move between the Bay Area and the Ukiah Valley. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 17 5.04.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs G oal CT-15: Encourage multiple use of the rail lines into and through the valley. Policy CT-15.1: Take an gctive role in development of a rail transit corridor. Implementation Measure CT-15.1 (a): Cooperate with, actively participate in, and influence the planning and evaluation of passenger rail services through the Ukiah Valley. Ensure that City and County interests are.considered in the process. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: City ;,r;,~ Cc,:.',';ty Public Works Departments, BOa~ ~!supe~isors, MCOG] Implementation Measure CT-15.1 (b): In the short-term planning period, work with appropriate agencies to develop a plan of Ukiah Valley rail needs, including potential station location(s), that would enhance the economic vitality of the planning area. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City aKd Cc'..',-;ty Public Works Departments, Board of Supervisors, MCOG ] Implementation Measure CT-15.1 (c): Ensure that project approval actions do not create land use or other conflicts that hamper or preclude passenger rail service in the Ukiah Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure C~-I5.1(d): Work with the Mendocino Council of Governments, Mendocino Transit Authority, and passenger rail planning agencies to develop an integrated transit corridor that ensures a connection from passenger station into the Valley's transportation corridors. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: City ~ Public Works Departments, MGOG, AQMD] Policy CT-I5.2: Encourage continued freight service on the rail lines. Implementation Measure CT-I5.2(a): Work with appropriate agencies and members of the private sector to ensure that freight transportation via rail is not discouraged or eliminated as a use on the track system. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Council, Board of Supervisors] Implementation Measure CT-15.2(b): Work with appropriate agencies and members of the private sector to increase utilization of freight transportation on rail as a regional approach to decreasing truck traffic on area roads and improving air quality. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City c,r;,~ Cc,~;7,,'y Public Works Departments, Board of ~~ors] Implementation Measure CT-15.2(c): Facilitate the use of rail for freight by siting appropriate industries and land uses near the rail line. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah · Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 18 5.05 Levels of service 5.05.01 Summary of major findings Level (LOS) a yardstickmeasures a traffic conditions. LOS of Service that how driver feels about was established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as a means of quantifying the subjective measure of traffic tolerance. Rated in grades from A (best) to F (worst), levels of service are based on increasing amounts of congestion and delay. LOS E represents the full capacity of the road segment with the road unable to carry more traffic. LOS F operating conditions are generally per- ceived as "intolerable." Table V.5-16 shows a simplified method of deter- Table V. 5-16: Segment Level of Service mining level of service for General Plan analysis based on Average Daily Traffic purposes. It identifies that capacity or traffic volume for roads in the General Plan area by level of service grade. Explanation V.5-XI on page 19 provides specific definitions for intersections with and without traffic signals. "Level of service" is used in two different and distinct ways in this General Plan. Segment level of ser- vice, listed in Table V.5-16 is the relationship of average daily traffic to the capacity of a segment of street between two defined points. Intersection level of service def'mes traffic congestion at an intersection. Both types of levels of service are important for determining whether the portion of the road network under scrutiny is capable of handling additional traffic generated by a proposed project. After all, it does not make good sense to increase traffic into an area so that no one can use the intersection or street segment. When drivers become less tolerant of traffic in an area, they avoid the area. This results in reduced property values, distressed businesses, and other negative economic factors. From an environ- mental standpoint, traffic that is idling also generates increased levels of air pollution. To try to prevent roads from reaching a level in which traffic just doesn't move well from point-to- point, cities establish guidelines at which a street or road is considered to have reached the highest service volumes that are tolerable within the community. At this level, it becomes important to either improve the street to acceptable levels or construct another street to relieve the crowded street. The segment level of service ratings in the General Plan are the indicators of this type problem. The Circulation Element objectives are designed to establish programs based on the segment levels of service. One of the issues that is used as an pre-indicator of future traffic problems is the concept of "degradation of level of service."~° For purposes of the General Plan, degradation of level of service is not a potentially significant environmental issue until the approval of a project will result in the existing level of service dropping to an unacceptable level of service, in the case of the Ukiah General Plan to Level of Service "D.' For example, if a road has a current level of service of "B," a project that would result in decreasing level of service from "B' to "C' is not considered a significant environmental effect on its face. ~°Degradation of level of service means an increase in traffic volume on a segment that causes the level of service to drop from one grade (A, B, C, D, E, or F) to the grade below it. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. CircUlation and Transportation 4, Page 19 Dropping the level of service from "B" to "D" may be a potentially significant effect that will require addi- tional information submitted with the application as part of the initial study to determine if the effect is significant. One method of facilitating the construction of road improvements and other circulation improvements needed to preserve or maintain level of service is collection of a fee called an "impact fee." Impact fees are funds placed into a trust account to be combined with other monies in the fund to complete improvements to infrastructure that are needed to accommodate the direct impacts of the project providing the money. An impact fee allows development to defer certain infrastructure improvements for as long as five years. The developer pays the fees, but the money is held by the City to be combined with other new development for more cost efficient improvement work. 5.05.02 Goal CT-16: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Development shall be permitted with- in road capacities. Policy CT-16.1: Level of service shall be the standard to judge whether a road has adequate remaining capacity to service the traffic generated by a pro- posed project. Implementation Measure C- T-16.1(a): The annual average daily traffic volume shown on the following two tables shall define segment level of service: Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 20 City of Ukiah ilJl, Mendocino County, Califomia Two lane streets and roads level of service thresholds LOS ADT A ............................................. ~ 2,700 B .......................................... 2,701-5,500 C .......................................... 5,501-8,700 D ......................................... 8,701-12,100 E ........................................ 12,101-15,000 Four lane streets and highways level of service thresholds LOS ADT A ............................................ ~ 18,300 B ........................................ 18,301-21,000 C ........................................ 21,001-24,000 D ........................................ 24,001-27,000 E ........................................ 27,001-30,000 [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-I6. I(b): For roads in excess of four lanes, traffic segment levels of service shall be adjusted proportionally to the four lane volume. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-I6.1 (c): The volume to capacity ratio (v/c) shown in Explanation V.5-3 shall define the intersection level of service. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Policy CT-16.2:Level of service "D" shall be the minimum acceptable service level for accommodating new development on roads classified as state highways, freeways, expressways, arterials, or collectors. Implementation Measure CT-I6.2(a): The City and County shall work with the Mendocino Council of Governments to monitor traffic volume on roads that presently have levels of service of C or D and report its findings dur-;.ng '~c a,~nual rcv':c'-,' of thc ~,~,,~,~; ,'"~-,,,,, ~: mnjunction ~ith :the Regio~: r~tion Plan updates . [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-16.2(b): If the Monday-Sunday level of service drops below Level of Service D, no discretionary permits shall be issued by the City or County unless a condition for project-related road improvements or traffic reduction programs to maintain LOS D is incorporated as a condition of project approval. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-16.2(c): In the event that approval of a development proposal would raise a road extension or new road priority from "future" to "immediate," Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. CirCUlation and Transportation 4, Page 21 and the direct impact of the proposed new development is insufficient to warrant changing the road's priority from "future" to "immediate," then approval of the project shall be based on one of the following options: (a) the project approval and issuance of any grading or building permits may be deferred until the road improvements have been scheduled and funding allocated; or (b) the project proponent may construct the improvements to City or County standards -- including those improvements not directly related to the project's impact -- and the City or County shall create a zone of benefit assessment in which the non-direct project costs shall be collected from future development and reimbursed to the proponent; or (c) The project may be denied with a finding that the existing circulation and access network is not adequate to accommodate the traffic and circulation needs of the proposed project. Failure to incorporate one of the options of this implementation measure within a project approval results in a project that is not consistent with the General Plan. ~' [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-I6.2(d): When a road segment is found to be approaching Level of Service D -- defined as ADT (Average Daily Trips) being within ten percent of the highest LOS C [as identified in Implementation Measure 16.2(e)], traffic volume threshold, the City shall initiate plans for improvements designed for the intermediate and long-term planning periods to increase capacity. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partrnent responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-I6.2(e): The improvements shall be initiated by the time traffic volume is approaching Level of Service E, which is defined as being within ten percent of the highest traffic volume for Level of Service D. This program may result in the generation of impact fees as a means of accumulating funds for the im- provements caused required by private development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Departmentre- sponsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-16.2(f): The thresholds of maximum traffic volume of segment levels of service C and D for scheduling these measures shall be: Ten Percent Threshold for ADT LOS 2 lane 4 lane C 7,830 21,600 D 10,890 24,300 [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] ~This measure and its components duplicates Implementation Measure 18.2(0 from Section V.5.09 to identify options that are applicable in this section of the General Plan as well as the latter section. Duplication ensures that the Measure applies in both sections of the Plan. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 22 City of Uklah/1~ Mendocino County, Califomia Implementation Measure CT-16.2(g): During the short-term planning period, when a road if found to have a level of service of "E,' the City or County shall prepare a plan of improvements to increase level of service to a "D' or "C' as may be required. The program for upgrade shall include an analysis as to whether impact fees may be required for fund improvements. New development shall not use or occupy new structures until the Plan has been adopted to raise the level of service to the appropriate minimum LOS. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Moa- sure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Deparlrnent responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Policy CT-16.3:Level of service "C' shall be the minimum acceptable service level for accommodating new development on roads classified as residential. Implementation Measure CT-16.3(a): When a new project is proposed on a road classified as "residential," and the development potential on that road allows for more than five additional single family residential equivalent units~2, utilize the ITE Trip Generation Manual to project the traffic count for the residential road to determine that the new development will not cause it to drop below Level of Service "C.' The determination shall be made by multiplying the number of existing dwelling units by ten~3 and adding to that product the average daily traffic from the new develop- ment. If the result of the multiplication is less than ten percent of the difference as shown in Implementation Measure 16.3(e), then the proposed project will not have an impact on the street, unless there are identified projects which may cumulatively combine with the proposed project to significantly impact level of service. If the product is equal to or greater than ten percent of the difference, the project will potentially have a significant effect on the level of service, and a traffic study may need to be completed to determine if capacity mitigation is required. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-16.3(b): If the Monday-Sunday level of service on a residential street drops below Level of Service C, no discretionary permits shall be issued by the City or County unless a condition for project-related road improvements or a traffic reduction program to maintain LOS C is incorporated as a condition of project approval. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County .t, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-I6.3(c): When a road segment is found to be approaching Level of Service C -- defined as ADT being within ten percent of the highest LOS B ~2A residential equivalent unit (REU) is a measure that is used to provide for consistency in the formulae in this measure. A single family residence generates ten vehicle trip ends (ADT) per day. An apartment may generate six to eight. By using REUs as the standard, five apartment units (at 6 ADT) would be the equivalent of five REUs. ~3The accepted standard average daily traffic for a single family residence is ten vehicle trip ends. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 23 traffic volume threshold, the City shall initiate plans for improvements designed for the intermediate and long-term planning periods :c, :~crcA,~c capac':~'. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-I6.3(d): The improvements shall be designed to be initiated by the time traffic volume is approaching Level of Service D, which is defined as being within ten percent of the highest traffic volume for Level of Service C. This program may result in the generation of impact fees as a means of accumulating funds for the improvements cauacd by private development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-I6.3(e): The thresholds of maximum traffic volume of segment levels of service B and C for scheduling these measures shall be: Ten Percent Threshold for AD T LOS 2 lane 4 lane B 4,950 18,900 C 7,830 21,600 [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-16.3(f): Residential streets or roads with a Level of Service of D or E at the time the General Plan is adopted shall be exempt from the "no permit" requirement until mitigation measures are in place to provide for increasing level of service to LOS C within five years of Plan adoption. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Policy CT-I6.4:Balance the --AA~ ~A-- circulation demands ~f new development with methods of accommodating increasing traffic. Implementation Measure CT-16.4(a): Review project traffic generation to ensure level of service remains within the City's thresholds. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-16.4(b): Require that applications for discretionary projects~4 include a generalized traffic study providing an estimate for the proposal's average daily traffic 0ftraffic ~ [Timeframe for com- pletion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department, County Building and Planning Department] Implementation Measure CT-16.4(c): For roads on which the base segment level of service is rated at A, B, or C, the following standards of review shall apply to project propos- als: ~nDiscretionary projects mean an application for an approval that is granted at the discretion of the Planning Commission or City Council. The meaning is the same as 14 CCR {}15357. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 24 (a) The City shall determine if the proposed project will increase the traffic generated by the subject property by more than ten percent over existing site- generate traffic volume :TI',J~ A'.A'' '.A -'A'~--:--~-' --A:---- ,'- ~ ....... .'~':.--A.~ ;i- (c) If the traffic generated is equal ten percent or less of the average daily traffic on the road, the traffic impact shall be deemed not to be significant, and no further traffic analysis is required. Using common sense as the guide to judge, the lead agency shall select one of the following steps as the standard for review: ® If the traffic generated by the proposed project increases the traffic on the road by more than ten percent, or the traffic volume generated by the subject property after development of the proposed project is projected to be greater than ten percent of the parcel's existing traffic volume, the proponent shall provide a traffic assessment prepared using accepted engineering standards to show how the project's traffic will fit into the circulation patterns in the area; or If the project is located on a road for which the level of service is A or B, and the traffic generated by the proposed project will not result in the level of service dropping to a "C" the traffic impact shall be deemed not to be significant, and no further traffic analysis is required; or · If the project is located on a road for which there is no additional development potential -- based on land use intensity and density -- and the traffic generated by the proposed project will not result in a Level of Service below a Level of Service C for residential streets or Level of Service D for all other streets, the traffic impact shall be deemed not to be significant, and no further traffic analysis is required; or · If the project will result in a change in the level of service as defined in the two prior situations, then in all cases the proponent shall provide a traffic assessment prepared using accepted engineering standards to show how the project's traffic will fit into the circulation patterns in the area. · In no case shall a property owner desiring to build one single family residence or a second unit on an existing single family residential parcel be required to prepare a traffic study. (d) If there are known projects proposed for the same street segment with traffic counts that are not included in the existing average daily traffic counts for the street, the traffic from these projects shall be added into the street segment average daily traffic prior to calculating the ten percent threshold. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod + Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Policy CT-I6.5:Work to develop methods of accommodating projects without degrading level of service. Implementation Measure ET-I6.5(a): In the event that the average daily traffic of the proposal places the level of service within ten percent of dropping to Level of Service D as Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~t, Page 25 shown in Implementation Measure CT-16.2(e) or Level of Service C as shown in Implementation Measure CT-16.3(a) for Residential Streets or in the event that the road has a level of service of D, the project proponent shall be required to use the services of a apprc, pr-:at¢ly licensed traffic engineer to prepare a more detailed traffic study, including an assessment of the impacts of the proposed project on the street's future level of service. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County · Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] In~lementation Measure CT-16.5(b): The detailed traffic study shall provide recommendations related to overall improvements -- or use improvements recommended in any traffic improvement program prepared by the City or County -- needed in the area to prevent degradation of level of service and shall also define the proportional share of the improvements that are attributable to the proposed project conditions. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-16.5(c): If the road has an existing level of service of E or F, the proponent shall be required to use the services of a apprc, prlat¢ly licensed traffic engineer to prepare a more detailed traffic study, including an assessment of the im- pacts of the proposed project on the street's future level of service. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County · Agency/De- partment responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-16.5(d): The detailed traffic study shall provide recommendations related to overall improvements -- or use improvements recommended in any traffic improvement program prepared by the City -- needed in the area to increase the segment level of service, or decrease the traffic demand on the segment served by the project to level of service D. The study shall also define the proportional share of the improvements that are attributable to the proposed project conditions. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] 5.06 Street classifications 5.06.01 Summary of major findings TheUkiah is served by a transportation consisting of state and area system highways, county roads, city streets. This section of the Circulation and Transportation Element defines the roads into classifications and purpose. Definition of road classifications can be found in Table V.5-4. U.S. 101 is an important north-south highway which links different areas within the city of Ukiah and also connects the community with northern California. The freeway has four lanes through Ukiah and controlled access which is limited to local street interchanges. State Route 20 (Highway 20) is a two lane mral cxprcaaway connecting the Ukiah area with Interstate 5 (1-5) and the Northern Sacramento Valley. Highway 20, an east-west ronte, is the northern border of the planning area located north of Lake Mendocino and intersecting US 101 near the unincorporated community of Calpella. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, Califomla V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 26 State Route 253, also known as Ukiah-Boonville Road, links Ukiah with Highway 128 and ultimately Highway 1 on the Mendocino Coast. This two lane rural arterial road intersects US 101 at the South State Street Interchange. The City of Ukiah currently maintains nearly fifty-two miles of city streets including arterial, major collector, collector, and residential streets. These road classifications, including County roads within the Planning Area are defined in Table V.5-18. The classifications of individual roads are listed in Table V.5- -18. Mendocino County also maintains paved and unpaved roads which are within the Planning Area but are outside the current city limits. Table V.5-17: Street, highway, and road classifications, land uses, and parking guidelines Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 27 Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and TranSp°rtation' 4,'Page 28 city of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County, California 5.06.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CT-17: Classify roads to meet service needs. Policy CT-17.1: Utilize arterial roads to serve through traffic. Implementation Measure CT-1ZI(a): Roads classified as arterials shall be used for the purpose of moving traffic into, through, and out of the City and the Planning Area. Implementation Measure CT-I7.1(b): For new roads to be classified as arterial roads, the route shall generally originate outside of the City limits (for City arterials) or within the Planning Area (County arterials) and the alignment shall be generally continuous from point of entry to point of exit. Policy CT-17. 2: Arterial roads shall generally be intended to serve commercial and employment center types of land uses. Implementation Measure CT-I7.2(a): Commercial and employment center land uses are consistent with roads classified as arterials. Policy CT-17. 3: Utilize major collector roads to serve as moderate- to high-volume roads connecting minor collectors and neighborhoods to arterial roads. Implementation Measure CT-17.3(a): Roads classified as major collectors shall be used for the purpose of moving traffic between arterial streets and residential neighborhoods or commercial/employment areas of the City. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ilJll Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 29 Implementation Measure L~-IZ3(b): For new roads to be classified as major collector roads, the route and alignment shall generally originate at an arterial road and terminate at another arterial, a collector, or at an entrance to a neighborhood. Policy CT-I 7.4: Major Collector roads shall generally be intended to serve commercial, employ- ment centers, and high density residential types of land uses. Implementation Measure CT-IZ4(a): Multi-family residential, commercial, and employment center land uses are consistent with roads classified as major collectors. Policy CT-17.5: Utilize minor collector roads to move traffic from arterial roads within the City and Planning Area. Implementation Measure CT-I 7.5(a): Roads classified as minor collectors shall be used for the purpose of moving traffic from arterial streets into and out of residential and commercial areas of the City and Planning Area. Implementation Measure CT-1Z5(b): For new roads to be classified as minor collector roads, the route and alignment shall generally originate at an arterial road and shall terminate at another arterial, a collector or at an entrance to a neighborhood. Policy CT-17. 6: MinOr Collector roads shall generally be intended to serve low intensity commercial uses and high density residential types of land uses. Implementation Measure 6~-17.6(a): Multi-family residential, and low intensity commercial uses are consistent with roads classified as minor collectors. Policy CT-17. 7: Utilize residential and rural roads to primarily serve areas where people live. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 30 Table V. 5-18: City and County Functional Service Classifications State Street Perkins Street (State-City Limits) Gobbi Street (Dore-City Limits) Talmage Road (State-City Limits) Low Gap Road Orchard (Perkins-end) Washington/Hastings Avenue Airport Park Boulevard Commerce Drive Main Street Oak Street (Gobbi-Henry) School Street (Mill-Henry) Brush Street Dore Street (City Limits-Grove) Orchard (Talmage-Perkins) Ford Street Standley Street (Dore-Mason) Clay Street (Dore-Peach) Clare Avenue Empire Drive (Bush-State) Perkins Street (Dore-State) Observatory Ave. (Dore-State) Bush Street (Grove-Low Gap) Perkins Street (City Limits-Vichy Springs Rd.) State Street (all areas outside City)Lake Mendocino Drive Talmage Road from City Limits to Sanford Ranch Road (east leg) Redemeyer Road Vichy Springs Road Moore Avenue East Side Road Eastside Capella Road Hensley Creek Road Orr Springs Road Gobbi Street (City Lmt-River Rd.) Low Gap Road Lovers Lane Oak Court Road (Dore-Oak Knoll) Dore Street (City Limits-Oak Court) Implementation Measure CT-1Z 7(a): Roads classified as residential or rural roads shall be used for the purpose of moving people from their homes into the City and Planning Area. Implementation Measure CT-17. 7(b): Single family and other low density residential land uses are consistent with roads classified as residential. Implementation Measure CT-] Z 7(c): On residential roads, multiple family residential land uses are appropriate land uses consistent with other policies of the General Plan, the neighborhood character, the road capacity, and level of service requirements. Implementation Measure CT-I 7. 7(d): Agribusiness, agriculture, single family, and other low density residential land uses are consistent with roads classified as rural. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah II~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~I, Page 31 5.07 Neighborhood Traffic Management 5.07.01 Summary of major findings A t the core of any community's health and well-being is its residential neighborhoods. Ukiah has a vested interest in preserving the small town character and integrity of its neighborhoods. As traffic volumes continue to increase in response to area-wide development, improvements to major arterial and collector streets have not kept pace causing increasing volumes of traffic to diffuse into residential areas. A residential street's function includes not only its place in the transportation system but its role as part of a community's living environment. Many of Ukiah's neighborhoods are at risk of losing their intimacy and identity to excessive traffic impacts. It is imperative that the community act to preserve its residential streets for all their intended functions. Different streets have different functions and need to be designed accordingly. In this respect, blanket standards are inappropriate. There is a need for flexibility in the design or modification of a street to meet the needs of its residents while serving its fair share of the circulation and public safety needs of the community. In some cases, traffic management may be considered a preferable means of enhancing Ukiah's character while ensuring that transportation needs are met. G 5.07.02 oal CT-18: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Preserve and enhance the small town character and integrity of all residential neighborhoods and streets. Policy CT-18.1:Provide for mitigation from traffic volumes and speeds not conducive to neighborhood character. Implementation Measure CT-18.1(a): During the short-term planning period the City and County shall develop a Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. [Z/rr~me for completion: Short-term planning period ,e, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Public Works Departments] 5.08 Future street and circulation patterns 5.08.01 Summary of major findings The existing growth patterns in the Ukiah Valley have followed the main roads and created a pattern in which relatively dense development (commercial uses) are accessible by only one road or one main road with an inconvenient alternative access. To accommodate the future growth of the Valley and improve circulation patterns, a series of new roads or road extensions will need to be constructed over the life of the General Plan. The five-year Circulation and Transportation Element update process discussed under Goal CT-4 in Section V.E. 1 will be used to assign development priority for new roads. Priority will be based on traffic studies, changes in levels of service, and pattern of development. Based on an analysis of current traffic patterns, the City's most critical needs are for an additional north-south arterial road and at least one major east-west arterial road. North-south traffic within the City travels primarily on State Street. Within the older residential areas, an additional north-south route exists Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah i111' Mendocino County, California Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 32 by traveling on Dora Street to Grove Street to Bush Street to Empire Street then back to State Street (the Dora-Bush Route). This ronte, however, is through a residential neighborhood and includes a significant number of stop signs, bike lanes, turns, and school zones. The Dora-Bush Route is inefficient. Its inex- haustible collection of stop signs slows traffic and decreases the level of service. In addition, "stop signs without purpose" -- as defined by drivers -- increase driver frustration which contributes to an increase in safety hazards from frustration-generated poor driving habits. East-west traffic must move through a combination of couplets, traffic lights, stop signs, zig-zags, and conflicting patterns in order to move from US 101 into the residential areas of town. The resulting congestion drops levels of service during peak hours to ratings that add to drivers' tempers and frustrations. The lack of east-west routes places greater traffic volume and pressure on existing road systems. In some cases, this means that the roads are handling more traffic than is appropriate for the road's capacity. The over-use of a road is especially true in the Standley (eastbound) and Perkins (westbound) couplet in the Downtown area. Perkins -- which originates at Redemeyer Road as Vichy Springs Road, features an inconsistent design along its entire route. With two lanes in some areas, four lanes in others, it has a lengthy left-turn lane for eastbound traffic at Orchard Avenue. Traffic flows are further hindered by unregulated driveway access throughout its length. Table V.5-19: Future roads and road exten- sions Within the eastern hills area, several existing and proposed subdivisions derive the only access connections to the Freeway and the City employment, shopping, and resource centers over Vichy Springs-Perkins Street. Alternate access to the Deerwood, El Dorado Hills, and Vichy Springs Subdivisions requires the use of a rural road designed to mostly serv Table V. 5-20: Planning Area free- e way interchanges the larg e - parc e 1 resi- dences along the way. Although it is unlikely that a "brand new" arterial can be established for north-south traffic, a number of road extensions Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 33 may be feasible in order to provide better north-south traffic flows. These routes are shown on Figures V.5-FF and GG and listed in Table V.5-FF. In addition to the street route changes, community sentiment seeks changes to the points of access -- called "interchanges" with US 101. The Freeway has nine interchanges within the Planning Area (Refer to Table V.5-20 the exception of the softball field, all interchanges provide north- and south-bound access. Caltrans has indicated that the interchanges are designed for substantially less traffic than is currently moving on and off the ramps. In 1991, the northbound US 101-North State Street interchange operated at level of service "F' dur- ing peak hours. Nearly two hundred vehicles above capacity used the ramp. ~5 As part of the same 1991 traffic study, US 101/North State Street Southbound, and all US 101-Perkins Street ramps were reported at Level of Service "E". Unless significant changes are made to the interchanges, and new interchanges added, Freeway access in the Valley will be a significant problem for regional traffic. During the vision process, members of the community identified a number of needs associated with US 101 Freeway improvements. General agreement centered on the need to redesign the Gobbi and Perkins interchanges so that they allowed freeway ingress and egress without requiring vehicles to make left turns across traffic. Additionally, the community envisions that a new interchange could be constructed at Brush Street or Ford Road to connect with the extension of Orchard Avenue in order to take pressure off the Perkins and North State interchanges. Improvements to the interchange of US 101 and Talmage are to be constructed as a part of the Airport Industrial Park off Talmage Road, which is a short distance west of the existing interchange. Other desired freeway improvements include the addition of an acceleration l~ine between Gobbi and Perkins (both directions) to allow a safer mix of accelerated and decelerating traffic in the short distance between the two interchanges. Sometimes it becomes necessary or desirable to abandon a street. This is a practice common in redevelopment areas where it is necessary to eliminate little-used streets in order to combine parcels for public purposes or to encourage development in an area. At other times, streets, easements, or rights-of- way are abandoned to make room for new road alignments. It is not uncommon for older subdivisions to have recorded easements, rights-of-way, or "future" roads that will never be developed. Abandonments must be reviewed by the City and County Planning Commissions to make a finding of "General Plan consistency" prior to the City Council or Board of Supervisors taking action to abandon the roads. When abandoning a little-used or undeveloped street or road results in a greater public benefit, the abandonment should proceed. ~SAnderson, Kenneth D., PE, Transportation and Circulation Resource Directory (Roseville, CA: KDAnderson Transportation Engineers, November 15, 1991), Table 4, page 16. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 34 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, California HENSLE~I not ROADS routes, alignment) S. MAIN STUPGRADE RK RD .:xtend to RD FUTURE ROAD ROUTES Figure V. 5-FF: Future roads and'road extensions- City of Ukiah Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation e, Page 35 ~ RIVER CROSSING IN THE C~LPELLA AREA REDEMEYER ROAD EXTENSION OVER THE RUSSIAN RIVER HENSLEY CREEK RD EXTENSION ORR SPRINGS RD UPGRA DF_/IMPRO VE EXTEND TO ORCHARD ORCHARD A VENUE EXT£NSIOH Planning Area City Limits routes within the a rea Figure V.5-GG: Future roads and road extensions -- Planning Area Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 36 to Perld~s St.: Eastside-Calpella Road to ~d then to to Sous Road to the venue £xtension. Orchard across Perkins Street Then on Gobbi to the south to ]"alrnase Road. This to Plant Road and back Street, ! ! ! Figure V. 5-HH: Route concepts in the City and Planning Areas (map does not show alignment or precise route) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ~, Page 37 5.08.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CT-19: Establish alternate North/South and East/West access routes. Policy CT-19.1: Develop a program to extend existing roads or construct new roads to meet existing traffic demands. Implementation Measure CT-19. I(a): During the short-term planning period, the City and County shall identify which road extensions and new roads will be needed in order to maintain or improve existing levels of service based on current traffic patterns. These shall be the "immediate need" new roads or road extensions. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~t, Agen- cy/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-19.1(b): Roads identified as "immediate need" shall have the proposed routes identified and surveyed during the short-term planning period, and shall be incorporated into the City or County Road Improvement Budget as high priorities. Preparation of a budget and cost of improvements shall be a City or County responsibility. [Timeframe forcompletion: Short-term planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-19.1(c): During the latter portion of the short-term planning period and the beginning of the intermediate-term planning period, the City or County shall allocate funds for the "immediate need" road construction. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ,~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-19.1(d): Road improvements shall be required as a condition of project approval related to the extension of any road or construction of a new road in conformance with the requirements of the Land Development Code and City or County Road Standards. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,e Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County '" ......... ' P',ann:,ng --'~ ~" ':'":-- PUbliC iWorks ~pa~ent] I..,a,~.,~j,,./gl I. ill~,,~l i% t,~l gl i,ImJ I,./~,,lll~,,,lll i~ : Policy CT-I9.2: Develop a program to extend existing roads or construct new roads to meet future traffic demands. Implementation Measure C~-19.2(a): During the short-term planning period -- as well as each five year update -- the City and County shall identify which road extensions and new roads will be needed in order to maintain or improve future or projected levels of service based on pending or proposed traffic patterns. These shall be the "future need" new roads or road extensions. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementan'on Measure C~-19.2(b): In the event of an amendment to the General Plan or the proposing of a project that will result in a shift in priorities, roads classified as "future need" may be reclassified as "immediate need" when necessary to mitigate potential traffic impacts. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,I, Measure applies to: City and County · Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, page 38 Implementation Measure CT-Ig. 2(c): Roads identified as "future need" shall have their proposed routes identified and surveyed during the intermediate-term planning period, and shall be incorporated into the City or County Road Improvement Budget as middle to high priorities. [Timeframe tot completion: Intermediate-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-19.2(d): During the intermediate-term planning period and into the long-term planning period, the City or County shall allocate funds for the "future need" road construction. [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-19.2(e): During each five year Circulation and Transportation Element update, review and revise as needed the classification of roads from "future" to "immediate.' [Timeframe for completion: Intermediate-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-19.200: In the event that approval of a development proposal would raise a road extension or new road priority from "future" to "immediate," and the direct impact of the proposed new development is insufficient to warrant changing the road's priority from "future" to "immediate," then approval of the project shall be based on one of the following options: (a) the project approval and issuance of any grading or building permits may be deferred until the road improvements have been scheduled and funding allocated; or (b) the project proponent may construct the improvements to City or County standards -- including those improvements not directly related to the project's impact -- and the City or County shall create a zone of benefit assessment in which the non-direct project costs shall be collected from future development and reimbursed to the proponent; or Failure to ~co~orate one of ~e optio~ of ~is ~plemenmtion me~ure wi~ a project approval resulm M a project ~at is not co~istent wi~ ~e General PI~. [~mo~mo for ~mplo~on: On9oin9 plannino ~fi~ · M, asum applies to: C~ and CounW ~ Agenc~opaamont ~sponsiblo: Ci~ Planning Dapadmont and Coun~ Depeamont of Plannin9 and Buildin9] o~ CT-20: ~o~de for fle~b~ M M~g new road rout~ or route ememiom. Poli~ ~-20.1: Allow PI~ men~enB for additioml routes or m~ification to routes. Implementation Measure CT-20.1 (a): During the annual review of the General Plan, the City or County may propose alternate road extensions or new routes in addition to those identified in the General Plan. The new routes shall be added to the General Plan by amendment. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning pedod 4, Measure applies Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah JlJl, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation 4, Page 39 to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-20.1 (b): During the annual review of the General Plan the City or County may propose to delete identified road routes or road extensions by amendment to the General Plan. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-20. I(c): Once a proposed road extension or new road is constructed, it shall be deemed to be removed from the "proposed road and road extension" list. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Goal CT-21: Improve freeway access. Policy CT-21.1: Work to improve the existing freeway interchanges. Implementation Measure CT-21.1(a): Working through the Mendocino Council of Gov- ernments, seek improvements to allow access in all directions to the interchanges of US 101 at Gobbi, Perkins, and North State Street. [Timetrame tot completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Implementation Measure CT-21. I (b): Work with MCOG and Caltrans to develop an off ramp to Perkins Street via Orchard Avenue. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City and County Public Works Departments] Goal CT-22: Ensure abandonments result in a public benefit. Policy CT-22.1: Provide for abandonment of undeveloped or liMe-used roads when there is a general public benefit to the Valley. Implementation Measure CT-22.1 (a): The Planning Commission and the City Council (for the City) or the Board of Supervisors (for the County) may find that an abandonment is consistent with the General Plan if it also finds that there is a greater public benefit from the abandonment than from maintaining public ownership of the road, easement, or right-of-way. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Moa- sure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 5.09 Major circulation improvements to the existing street system 5.09.01 Summary of major findings WithinPlanning Area, are numerous segments to be the there intersections and road that need improved in order to provide for a better traffic flow. Some improvements may be minor, such as removing a four-way stop from an intersection that does not warrant the traffic control. Other cases may require that a four-way stop be added to increase traffic safety. Additional improvements Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California , , , V.5. Circulation and Transportation · Page 40 can range from replacing four-way stops with traffic signals, synchronizing traffic signals, adding lanes, and realigning intersections. Improvements to existing roads may be classified as "general improvements" or "project-specific im- provements.' Project specific improvements are construction or design activities that take place as a direct result of development. General improvements are related to increasing capacity, improving or maintaining level of service, or increasing safety. During preparation of the General Plan, a number of major intersections were assessed for existing peak hour levels of service. Some of the intersections were reported at Levels of Service at "E" and "F", indicating that improvements are needed in the short-term. Others with Levels of Service "C" and "D", are candidates for intermediate-term improvements. The approach for improving roads is to develop a system that places the greatest priority on intersections and street segments that currently have unacceptable levels of service (E or F). The second level priority is placed upon on intersections or road segments at risk of dropping to a Level of Service "D" or lower. Long-term priorities will be established during the review periods for intersections with current levels of service at "A" or "B". Future streets need not only address the need for new roads, routes, or intersection improvements but also need to encourage pedestrian traffic, especially in the downtown area. A downtown plaza and park is a key component to revitalizing the downtown area. Eliminating Stephenson Street between South State and South School streets is the first step to creating a Downtown Plaza. 5.09.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CT-23: Improve traffic flows with intersection improvements. Policy CT-23.1: Develop a phased program to improve intersections based on existing LOS. Goal CT-24: Policy CT-24.1: Implementation Measure CT-23.1 (a): When roads are identified with levels of service of "E' or "F," plans to decrease demand, to improve flows, or increase capacity shall be prepared and implemented during the short-term planning period. [T~fra~ifor CompletiOn: ShOrt-te~ planning ~riofl ~ Measure applies to~'~C~a~ :C0~hty Agen- cy/Departmentresponsible: Ci~ and Coun~ Publi0 Works] Implementation Measure CT-23. I (b): When roads have levels of service of "C" or "D" traffic reduction measures, intersection improvements, or road segment improvements shall be put into place as soon as the periodically prepared traffic studies indicate that the level of service will drop from a "D' to an "E' or less. ~ngoi~ Plan' ning:~ ~nsibte: 'City a:n~ ~untY PUbr~o~san~ Me~od~ Cou~ of iGovemm~ents] Implementation Measure CT-23. I(c): The periodic traffic studies prepared for each Cir- culation and Transportation Element update shall alert the City and County to roads in which the level of service is in danger of dropping from an "A" or "B" to a "C" or less. ~nd .~.~ ;:i~..~:.i!:i~gency/Deparlmenti~i ?.!~'C~ ..i~ '~-~ntY:~Ubl!C ~!iWO~S. :and Establish policies for the use of traffic control devices. Require substantiation of need prior to installing new four-way stops. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program V.5. Circulation and Transportation ,I, Page 41 Implementation Measure CT-24.1(a): When requested to install a four-way stop, utilize accepted traffic engineering practices to determine whether the intersection warrants the change in traffic control. [~~e:!ot.comp!etton::.~.,,iOngolngplan~g!~~ Measure'"appl~i:~:..,~.~i-:a~i~ty ~:::!!, andCOUn~ ~Ubl!~ :W~] Implementation Measure CT-24.1(b): When intersection levels of service at a four-way stop controlled intersection are at risk of dropping to an "E" or "F", prepare a study to determine if a signal is needed. ~::tor: ?Ongoing plan~lng'.~ 4, ~:. ?!!~::~Pd County pablic:WorkS] Implementation Measure CT-24. I(c): Signal sequencing shall be given a high priority, particularly where lights are numerous. [r/me~metorcomPletion::On~gplanning ~riod : ~ Measure :applies to: C~ and ~u~: ~ rlment : C~and County PUbliC: Works] Policy CT-24. 2: Improve traffic movement when improving intersections. G Implementation Measure CT-24.2(a): When intersections are improved or designed, provide large curb radii at arterial intersections as often as possible. l~>n:, Ongoi~ planni~"~ .':'~":: ~re. ~::to~':~ a)~:'~'!' ~.~. Implementation Measure CT-24.2(b): Bus stops shall be downstream from intersections. [rm~ermme for comp~rn>n: ~~ ~a ~ ~: Agoncy~pa~nt M~nd~ ~ransR Authgfity] oal CT-25: Develop programs to improve traffic flows without requiring publicly-funded improvements. Policy CT-25.1: Seek to establish programs which reduce the amount of traffic on the road during peak hours. Implementation Measure CT-25.1(a): Work with employers to evaluate peak times of em- ployee traffic and evaluate spreading work hours or allowing flexible scheduling. :i::[T/metrame for completion:: OngOing.':Planning .~,: ~.~: :~:. Meesure.::appt!e$10:.i and ~nty::~Agency/Deparlment: : :C~ P~n~ng peP BUilding'Depa~e~ :a~jMe~n~ Cq~of :Governments] Implementation Measure CT-25. I (b): Cooperate with government and cc,.,'-~l-~crcc rs to encourage work-at-home programs. ~meframe:~ ~.:'~.'i::.Measu~ 'to~i~!:i;C~,:~ t ~:::City ~anni~.::Depa~nt;.: CountY:'p!a~n:~gl ilding'~pa ~Overnmnts,: .Boa~Of S~rVisors] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.I. Housing 4, Page 1 HOUSING HE HOUSING ELEMENT is one of the mandatory General Plan elements. It intended by the Legislature to ensure that all local governments contribute to meet state housing goals. The Legislature intends that the Housing Element is to be implemented to the best efforts the City is capable of achieving.~ This element must meet detailed statutory guidelines for content, in addition to ensuring that all policy programs are consistent with the remainder of the General Plan. The Housing Element covers a ten year period -- the General Plan's short and intermediate planning periods -- with emphasis on the first five years. The Housing Element is the only Element that must be reviewed and approved by the State with the responsibility resting with the Department of Housing and Community Development. The Housing Element policies are only applicable within the City limits of Ukiah. 1.Of Introduction The Land Use Element identifies the desired location and density of new housing in the City. The Housing Element focuses on the shelter needs. A primary goal of the Housing Element is to conserve existing stable neighborhoods and Table VI. 1- f: Population and Minority Data Total Population 11,881 Pct. 14,599[Pct. :::::: ::: :::::: ::: ::: :::::: ::::::::: :::: :i:!: :!:~:~:~:~:~:~: :i:~:~:~:: ::: ::: ::::: :i: :::i:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: i:~:!:~:~:~:~::.~:~:~:i:~:~:~:!:¢!: ::::::::::::::::::::: ! ~ ~ ~ ~ : ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::5: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.::::::::::: 5::: ::5:: i:i:i:i:i:!:~:~:!:~:~:i:!:~:i:!:[:~:~:~:~:~:i:!:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:i:~:[:~:~:[:~:~:!:i:~:!:~:i:~:¢~:~ [ ~ i i i iii iii!! [:~:~:~:~:[:i:i:[i~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: Total 778 'l 1709 - encourage housing in areas where new housing needs are identified. In order to calculate the maximum number of new dwelling units that can be constructed on the existing residentially-designated lands, all undeveloped parcels zoned for residential land uses in the City were inventoried. This inventory is produced in Table VI.5-30 on Element page 15 as lands suitable for new housing, undeveloped parcels are assigned maximum density as permitted by the existing zoning district. The Housing Element also addresses the quality of the built environment and promotion of affordable housing. Housing needs of specific groups are addressed where reliable information was available. 1.02 Population projections and build, out ~Government Code §65581. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 2 The proposed General Plan anticipates continued residential and population growth, as well as expansion in economic activity, in the Ukiah Valley over the planning period which extends to the year 24,000 18,000 g16,000 20,000 14,000 ~i 12,000 10,000 ~ i i 1980 lg8s 1990 t99S 2000 200S 2010 2015 Year =igure VI. f-B: City of Ukiah Population Trends and Projections xmprovements. 2015. Economic expansion would be the result of continuing population growth in the area and independent economic development activities. The General Plan will shape the intensity, location and distribution of growth during the planning period. However, the amount of growth which can be expected during the planning period will be regulated primar- ily by the prevailing rate of growth in the area regardless of the provisions of the General Plan. For the purposes of en- vironmental assessment, as- sumptions have been made about expected residential, com- mercial and industrial growth, with related circulation 1.02.01 Current population information The City of Ukiah had a population of 14,599 in 1990, according to the final 1990 US Census Data provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The population was housed in 5,825 housing units (dwellings) covering 5,666 households. Of the dwelling units, 2,850 (48.93%) were owner occupied, 2,812 (48.27%) were renter occupied. The remaining 163 housing units (2.80 %) were vacant. The California Department of Finance Population Research Bureau prepares official estimates of population between census data collection. The Department estimates that the City's 1995 population is 15,783, a growth of 8.11 percent over the five year period. This is lower than the City and Planning Areas' typical 2~ percent annual growth rate. 1.02.02 Population projections The probable maximum annual growth rate for residential development is about two percent per year, which compounds to a simple annual growth rate of about 2lb percent annually. Between 1980 and 1990 the growth rate was just over two percent per year.2 With a 1995 estimate of 6,364 City as a base, residential development over the twenty year planning period may result in about 2,804 new dwelling units 2United States Census Data compiled for the 96067 zip code by CACI, Arlington, Virginia (Beltsville, MD: CompuServe Census Data Forum, June 20, 1992), Screen 1 of 2. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing 4, Page 3 within City. This increment of growth represents an increase of about 44 percent in the total number of units currently existing in the City. Development patterns in the City will generally follow the zoning and development patterns that have occurred over the past twenty years. The 1995 City limits are approaching complete build-out, although there is adequate land area within the City to meet the short-term housing needs allocation. The General Plan provides for a central focus to bring urbanized lands into the City. Although there is a significant level of urban development within the proposed Sphere of Influence (also part of the adopted Sphere of Influence that exists in 1995), most of this is within the unincorporated area. The more focused limitations on urban development are based on a combination of policy programs, including lack of secondary access for fire protection and general access, lack of public facilities, and a desire to maintain rural appearances in the unincorporated Valley. The acreage to be developed during the life of the Plan is likely to be less than the acreage of the areas available for development within the City. The "build-out rate" of acres consumed is based on the rate of demand for housing and economic development. In the fifteen years between 1980 and 1995, the population of the City of Ukiah increased by 49.68%, approximately 3.31 percent per year. This growth rate dropped to less than two percent per year in the past five years. If all parcels were to develop, the City would experience a growth rate in excess of 4~h percent per year a growth rate nearly twice the historic pattern for the City of Ukiah. The credible buildout3 figure is based on the rate of land consumption that is most likely to occur over the life of the General Plan. Credible buildout is the 44 percent growth factor projected over the twenty- year life of the Plan. Population projections -- developed from data prepared by the California Department of Finance, Population Research Bureau -- projects that the City's population will increase from an estimated 15,783 in 1995 to 22,739 in 2015. The population increase includes areas that the City may be petitioned to annex, because at maximum development density within the existing City limits, the maximum incorporated population is 19,900. 3The projected growth and development that is likely to occur during the life of the Plan is called credible buildout. Buildout is the maximum development of the City. The terms are discussed in Section II.5 of the Introduction and defined in Chapter IX, the Glossary to the General Plan. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 4 1.03 Public Participation Incorporating public participation process Plan, the Housing Element intensive for the entire General was also prepared by a Citizen Advisory Committee representing all economic segments of the community in the updating of the entire General Plan, including the Housing Element. The Citizen Advisory Committee, the Growth Management Steering Committee, and the Low-Moderate Income Housing Advisory Committee were all involved in the process. The various committees included representatives from Nuestra Casa--a Mendocino County-funded Hispanic Housing Agency, the Northern Circle Housing Authority--a US Housing and Urban Development-funded Indian Tribal Housing Agency, and local housing advocacy agencies--such as the Community Development Commission and the Rural Community Housing Development Corporation. Ukiah's multi-cultural community members were involved at every level of the process. The following members of the Housing Element Citizen Advisory Committee were responsible for preparing the foundation to the goals and policies that have been expanded and incorporated into the Housing Element: 1.03.01 Housing Element Citizen Advisory Committee To develop the General Plan revision and Growth Management program, the Ukiah City Council appointed fifteen Citizen Advisory Committees, one for each element, including Housing. The work of the Citizen Advisory Committees is detailed in Chapter II to the General Plan. The Housing Element Citizen Advisory Committee worked independently of the other committees to develop its policy recommendations for the Housing Element. The committee met approximately twenty-four times over a period of over two years to discuss housing issues, opportunities, constraints and strategies for Ukiah. The committee reviewed the draft document in May, 1992. The committee prepared the Preliminary Action Program for the Housing Element. Housing Element Citizen Advisory Committee members: Martin Bradley Irene Hardie Susan Crane I nge Dietrich Robert Castellanos Karen Poplawski Ron Cole Lyn Wood Angie Svendsen 1.03.02 Public comments during the scoping process During the process of developing the Housing Element, a number of comments and recommendations were received by the City from various individuals and organizations. 1.04 Evaluation of previously certified Housing Element Unlike other elements of the General Plan, the Housing Element must be reviewed and updated every five years. California law requires that the update include an evaluation of programs approved in the prior Housing Element to report to accomplishments. This section of the Housing Element provides the evaluation of the last certified element. le The City Planning Commission shall continue to review the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision regulations to eliminate those items which decrease housing availability and affordability, but do not effect public health or safety. Annually in March, a complete review of the ordinance will be undertaken. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 5 Status: A complete review of the Zoning Code was completed by the Planning Commission in late 1992. These comprehensive revisions are being held umil the revised General Plan is implememed. Staff has not yet completed an analysis of which modifications would have a significam on availability or affordability of housing. Housing availability and affordability are key issues in the General Plan effort. Because the General Plan revision is currently in progress, a complete review of the ordinance will be conducted once the General Plan is implememed. ' Evaluation: A complete review of the zoning code each year is impractical. Such a review should be scheduled approximately every three years. Implementation of the General Plan will include such a review and possible restructuring of the various code provisions. Individual zoning issues can be addressed at any time on a specific needs or idea basis. The revised General Plan calls for a complete rewrite of the zoning ordinance to create a consolidated land developmem code that will include streamlining provisions to facilitate housing development. e The City will continue to cooperate with aH local housing assistance agencies in pursuing housing funding sources. Each year a Community Development Block Grant application .will be submitted for either rehabilitation activities or new construction. Status: The City continues to cooperate with the Community Developmem Commission of Mendocino County (CDC) and tile Rural Community Housing Developmem Corporation (RCHDC) to provide affordable and available housing. The City assisted in applying for the gram which expanded the Ford Street Guest House facility and also participated in the HOME gram application (not funded). The City is participating in the countywide Mortgage Credit Certificate program administered by CDC and is completing the transfer of the Observatory Property for a parcel on Bush Street which will be developed with all affordable housing units. The Ukiah Redevelopmem Agency assisted RCHDC with a long term $30,000 loan for the senior citizen project on Bush Street which was primarily financed by federal Housing and Urban Developmem funds. A new CDBG application has not been processed each year. Evaluation: Past experience with rehabilitation loans has required an extensive marketing effort to implemem the program with limited results. The requiremem for an annual CDBG application will require additional staff and monetary resources to prepare the applications and administer the grams. Actual grants should be applied for in response to specific documemed needs and a willingness of property owners to participate. 3. Property rezoning to (PD) "Planned Development" shaH be encouraged and expedited to facilitate cost saving development techniques. Status: The most recem Planned Developmem rezoning accommodated approximately 150 units south of Gobbi along the extension of Orchard Ave. The majority of parcels in the two subdivisions are committed to low and moderate income persons through CDC and RCHDC programs. RCHDC is requesting a General Plan Amendment and rezone for approximately three acres east of Main Street to provide low and moderate income "for sale" units. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 6 Evaluation: Planned Developmem zoning is a viable tool in the production of affordable housing. The parcel size requiremem of the Planned Developmem zone limits the application of the district to in fill properties. Modification of this requiremem and continued use of the district regulations is recommended. . The City will continue to implement programs identified to address areas of need documented in the "Mendocino County Housing Needs Plan" (Fair Share Plan). The City will cooperate with the Mendocino Council of Governments in its review of these allocations every three years. Status: The City participated in Mendocino Council of Governmems' 1992 "Housing Needs Plan" and cominues to pursue programs which meet the documemed need for affordable housing. We have continued to work with a firm in Sonoma County to complete approximately 30 housing units on Mulberry Street. The majority of units constructed in the last ten years have been in the affordable range with most being subsidized through a recognized program. Evaluation: The City is required to participate in the Mendocino Council of Government's (MCOG) Fair Share Plan. This action item is appropriate to ensure local input to the regional allocation. . The City will generate on an annual basis appropriate housing related information using, as the basis, the various analyses provided in the Census. City staff shall report progress on implementation of the Housing Element annually in February. Status: The distribution of usable federal Census data has been extremely slow. In addition, State Departmem of Finance estimates since 1990 have not been as extensive or comprehensive as before. The General Plan and Growth Managemem Revision Program should provide the most reliable, updated information available. This evaluation comprises the annual progress report. Evaluation: The City depends upon the State Departmem of Finance for population projections and housing unit information. The new General Plan data can be used, but the resources are not available to provide in-depth analysis on an annual basis. The annual review of progress on the Elemem is an additional administrative activity which does little to increase the actual production of housing units. It would seem more efficient to conduct the review effort in conjunction with the State mandates for updating the Housing Element. . The City of Ukiah shall support the Mendocino County Housing Authority/Community Development Commi.~sion as having primary responsibility for the following activities: application for CDBG funds, administering funds secured under State or Federal housing programs, providing assistance to developers of low and moderate income housing, managing public housing units or rental assistance programs. Local churches will be asked to inventory church holdings suitable for development of low or moderate housing, or a homeless shelter. They will be asked to provide leadership in developing the properties. Service dubs will be asked to assist in these efforts. Status: CDC is the primary resource for CDBG rehabilitation activities. Because of the difficulty in marketing rehabilitation grams and loans, the City has not pursued this activity Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 7 recently. Currently, the City is processing a CDBG Planning Study to analyze the homeless population and prepare funding applications for at least two facilities for the homeless mentally ill and homeless families with children. A large number of Article 34 units remain available. Evaluation: Local churches have not been requested to inventory or assess any vacant land, though they are organizing to address sites to provide weekend meal services to the needy. Similarly, there has been no request of service clubs for special housing projects. Continued support of CDC is very appropriate. CDC will become more involved in actual administration of citywide housing programs. CDC expertise will continue to be called upon to provide assistance to developers and to manage public housing. 7. The City shall educate the public in the need for affordable housing. Status: A comprehensive educational program on affordable housing has not been developed. However, some information has been distributed through the City's bi-annual "Community Newsletter" and Redevelopment informational flyers. Evaluation: The need for affordable housing appears to be well understood throughout the community, though specific projects may cause the "NIMBY" ("not in my backyard") syndrome because of low and moderate income connotations. The priority should be placed on efforts to produce the housing. 8. The City shall implement residential density bonus programs as provided for in State law and controls for resale by June 1986. Status: The City has implemented the density bonus provision of State law. Current policy stipulates that density bonuses will be granted in favor of other incentives. This provision was most recently used in the senior citizen project on Bush Street. Evaluation: This action item has been completed. Bonuses have been granted and the City Council is to adopt an ordinance addressing state law requirements at their December 1, 1993 meeting. 9. The City will support and provide information to agencies charged with implementation of anti-discrimination regulations. Status: All requests for discrimination information are currently referred to Redwood Legal Assistance, the District Attorney's Office, and the Fair EmploYment and Housing Department. Evaluation: The continued referral of such inquiries to the designated agencies is appropriate, as the City does not have the expertise or resources to address, in adequate detail, these matters. 10. The City will encourage attempts to maintain existing housing stock through maintenance and rehabilitation grants. A procedure should be developed by December 1986, in which demolition Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 8 permits are referred to the Mendocino County Community Development Commission for rehabilitation and other available means of maintaining the unit in a residential character. Status: Evaluation: 11. As noted earlier, CDC is the lead agency for rehabilitation grants and none have been applied for in the last two years. CDC has been advised of demolitions with the hope that rehabilitation could occur. CDC is actually not prepared at this time to deal with existing units; their programs are more oriented toward new construction. Demolitions are reviewed by the City Council, with recommendations from a newly constituted Demolition Permit Review Committee, comprised of the Chairman of the Planning Commission, and representatives of the building industry and general public. The Community Development Commission has indicated a preference to work with committed property owners and existing qualified housing. The City will continue to discuss demolitions with interested agencies. Specific reference to CDC should be eliminated and this item should be added to the list of potential implementation measures. The City shall continue to inspect existing rental units upon written request, but at a reasonable cost, with a report presented to the owners and the occupants outlining the health and safety dangers (if any) and requiring compliance with the Housing Code, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 17299 and 24436.5. Status: The City continues to provide building inspections upon request. Though the property owner is notified, the system has been improved to accommodate tenant inspection requests. Evaluation: This procedure is effective and has resulted in some housing upgrades. Continuation is appropriate. 12. City staff will assist the Community Development Commi~ion to prepare a summary of available rehabilitation loan programs and also study the feasibility of marketing.revenue bonds to raise additional monies for this purpose. Status: CDC maintains information regarding rehabilitation; however, as noted earlier, marketing and administration of these programs is difficult. It is not the highest priority for local housing providers or most cost effective projects at this time. Some individual applications for Redevelopment Housing Set-aside Funds have been reviewed by the Low and Moderate Income Housing Advisory Committee but not funded because of the low efficiency factor. Revenue bonds at the local level are not the best method to finance rehabilitation efforts. Rehabilitation of individual single family homes, although important, conserve housing for one family at a time. For more families to be served with limited dollars, the programs focus on rehabilitation of multi-family housing so that more people and housing units are served by available dollars. Evaluation: This matter is still valid. The City has adopted the State Historic Building Code as well as the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. 13. The City will continue to preserve its architectural heritage through the State Historical Building Code and the Marks Historical Rehabilitation Act of 1976. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing 4, Page 9 Status: A proposed historic preservation ordinance was discussed by the Planning Commission with an ad hoc Historic Preservation Committee, but the entire issue was deferred to the General Plan/Growth Management Plan program. Evaluation: This matter is still valid. The City has adopted the State Historic Building Code as well as the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. 14. The City will continue to work with the Community Development Commission to locate and acquire sites for resale to developers or annual builders of housing for low and moderate income persons. Status: A minimal number of housing sites are located within the corporate limits. The City continues to work with CDC and other non-profit housing organizations to secure available sites. The City is reviewing various programs, particularly site acquisition, for continued use of redevelopment funds. Evaluation: With the few sites and minimal financial resources available, this particular item has not been accomplished. Though the City works closely with the Community Development Commission, this action item is too specific. Property purchase and resale is one of many implementation measures which can be pursued. 15. A study of the utilization of performance standards instead of specification standards shall be completed and reviewed by the Planning Commission and Council by June, 1986. Status: A study of "performance standards" in zoning and subdivision regulations has not been performed. This is to be incorporated into the implementation phase of the General Plan in conjunction with the update of the zoning code. Currently, Planned Development zoning comes the closest to performance standards within the City. Evaluation: The Growth Management/General Plan includes provisions to move towards a performance-based zoning ordinance of the recommended implementation of the General Plan. The proposal is valid though the timeframe must be revised. 16. The City shall participate with the County in their assessment of farm worker housing conditions and determine appropriate actions to pursue. This assessment is to be completed by January 1989. Status: The County Housing Task Force, which was to address this issue has been inactive for several years. The County's recently (April 1993) revised Housing Element addresses farm worker housing for permanent and migrant situations, but does not identify locations or specific standards. Evaluation: The County's assessment of farm worker housing is complete and incorporated in their Housing Element adopted in April 1993. This item should be deleted. 17. The City shall continue to support efforts by the existing Emergency Housing Task Force and encourages that body to report to the Planning Commission. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah/1~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 10 Status: The Emergency Housing Task Force is no longer in existence. The City has adopted zoning code provisions for emergency shelters. Ford Street Project and Project Sanctuary provide shelters within the corporate limits accounting for 34 beds. Evaluation: The Emergency Housing Task Force no longer functions. The City participates with the Ford Street Project, Ukiah Community Center, Plowshares, and other appropriate entities to address the emergency shelter issue. This item should be deleted. 18. The City will notify the School District of any major development that may have impact on the local school system. Status: The Ukiah Unified School District is contacted regarding all subdivisions and major commercial projects. Also each building permit with new residential or commercial space requires School District approval of school impact fees. There is an agreement between the Ukiah Unified School District and the Redevelopment Agency relative to impacts caused by increased development. Evaluation: This is standard planning procedure which occurs through public noticing, environmental review, and participation in the Growth Management/General Plan process. Table VI.'I-3: Population displayed by Household Type iHouseholds 4,689 Pct 5,662 Pct. Families 3,129 t67 3,657 t65 Married Couples i2,722 *87 2,646 *72 .... .......... t ..... ........ ...... .... ............................. ..... ........ ........ iPA~;ns Living i1,076 t23 1,648 t29 i Group Quarters 310 t7 557 tlO i lnstitutional I 303 t6 426 t8 Non-Institutional 7 tO 131 t2 I 19. Investigate the feasibility of submitting applications for a mortgage bond allocation from the State Mortgage Allocation Committee or a Mortgage Credit Certificate. September 1987 is the deadline for this activity. Status: Mortgage Revenue Bonds have not been pursued because of their high cost to benefit ratio. The City is participating in the Countywide Mortgage Credit Certificate program administered by CDC. An application for $10 million has just been submitted to the California Debt Limitation Allocation Committee, with the effective date to be late November or early December. Evaluation: Though the deadline was not met, the City is not currently participating with the Community Development Commission in the countywide Mortgage Credit Certificate program. As several other action items, this is very specific and should be listed among several implementation measures to be pursued. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 11 f .05 1.05.01 Community profile Population The City's population is primarily White with limited numbers of Blacks, American Indians, and Pacific Islanders. Whites represent 88% oft he population, down from 92% in 1980. The fastest growing group in Ukiah is Hispanic persons of all races. Population and race data for 1980 and 1990 are shown on Table VI. 5-21. 1.05.02 Housing stock The number of housing units in Ukiah has increased by approximately 20% between 1980 and 1990; the vacancy rate has decreased by three percent as shown in Table VI. 1-4. Ukiah's vacancy rate of three percent is indicative of a very tight and competitive housing market. Over the ten year period, Ukiah has slightly shifted away from owner occupied units, to an even split of renters and owners. This change in the tenure of housing units can be partly attributed to the increase in two-to-four unit multi-family apartments available for rent and also the high cost of housing. Fewer people can afford to buy a home in the community, and so more people are renting. As Table VI.5-25 demonstrates, the fastest growing types of housing in the City are projects with two or more units (multi-family, or single family attached). The traditional single family residence has continued to increase in number; Table V1.1-4: Housing Stocklnventory however, its proportionate share of all 'TotalHousingUnits 4,972 Pct. 5,825 ,,c,.ll For Sale or Rent Only 158 3.2 82 1.4 II Seasonal/Other 129 2.6 81 1.4 I housing units has dropped from 80 % to 64% since 1970. The City's position has been to allow the market to drive the types and number of housing units. Housing types containing two or more units have increased almost three fold since 1970, and projects with five or more units have shown a steady increase. From 1980 to 1990, the entire housing stock increased twenty percent. In real numbers, mobile homes have increased in the City from 423 to 505 units, but the number of units has not increased at the same rate as multi-family development types. 1.05.03 Income characteristics In the Housing Element, two sources of income information are used. The first is the Ukiah Community Profile prepared by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) in 1991. The second source is 1990 Census data. Data also reflects "household" and "family" incomes. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 12 The median household income for households within all parts of Mendocino County in 1990 Census was $31,500 per year.4 Median household income for the City of Ukiah used in Table VI. 1-6 is $24,402. Table VI. 1-5: Housing units by type 1970-1990 I categories: very-low, low, moderate, and above moderate. Median income is the point at which half of the households earn less income each year, half earn more. Median income is useful in assessing the ability of an average family to secure housing; however, it masks issues of critical need and over payment. In addressing affordable housing issues, income brackets are divided by the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) into four main The very low income household earns up to fifty percent of the City's median income. Some studies divide this in household incomes of 0-30 percent and 31-50 percent. For purposes of the housing element, the under fifty percent category is used for very low income families. Within this range are households at or below the poverty level. Low income households earn between 50-80% of the area median. Moderate income households earn 80-120 %, and above moderate income households earn over 120 % of the median income. Table VI.5-27 shows the number of households by income group. The PG & E Profile projects a shift in be the result of salaries increasing with employee tenure or promotions or salary increases due to economic development, or in-migration of households with a higher income than is typical for Ukiah. In- migration of more affluent persons is a possibility given the relatively affordable housing in Ukiah as compared with commu- nities in northern Sonoma County. As the Bay Area continues to grow outward, many households are increasingly willing to commute for longer time periods to be able to afford a home and maintain a high paying job. Traffic patterns on Highway 101 indicate an increase in commute traffic from the Ukiah Valley south to Sonoma County. income distribution for 1995 (see Table VI.5-27). This could Table VI. 1-6: Reported Value of Owner Occupied Units 1990 less than $50,000 $ 51,000 - 99,999 37 $100,000- 149,999 40 $150,000- 199,999 $200,000 + ,;.;.;.;.;..;.;...~ .;.~.;,;.;.;.;.~.- - -.;,.~;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;~.:.;.: -.;.-.;.; - .;.;.;.- - -.;.;.;,;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.; 42 834 913. 315 14 160 7 Another type of income measurement is the "family income."5 Median family income for the City is $29,387, which is nearly $5,300 higher than median household income. Higher family income is often a result of two wage earners. The Ukiah Community Profile provides more income detail for City residents, as shown in Table VI. 1-27. nMendocino Council of Governments, Housing Needs Plan, 1991. "family" includes persons living together who are related by blood or marriage. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJll Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 13 The information presented in Table VI. 1-27 does not take into account the effect of family size. The ability of a household's income to cover basic living and discretionary costs of living is partly determined by the number of persons in the household. An Table VI, I-7: Household Income City of Ukiah income of $30,000 per year for a single person household compared to a six member household is very different in terms of lifestyle and ability to secure appropriate housing. Table VI.5-28 illustrates the effect of family size in determining income groupings in Mendocino County. As part of the 1990 Census, the head of household was asked to indicate whether the residence was owned or rented. Owners were asked to report the value of the residence (See Table VI.5-26); renters were asked the amount of the monthly rental payment. Not all households answered these questions; the response rate was 80 % for owners, 96 % for renters. The profile of the responses has been used to generate rental and 0- $7,499 668 8.8 12.0 $7,500- 9,999 457 6.0 4.2 10,000- 14,999 574 7.6 10.6 15,000 - 24,999 1,009 13.4 15.3 25,000- 34,999 941 12.5 14.3 35,000 -49,999 1,036 13.7 18.1 50,000- 74,000 618 8.2 16.6 value information for all housing units in the City. 75,000 and over 267 3.5 1.1 The median value of all owner occupied [ Total 7,560 ?~iii~!ii~!ii~i~i~iiiiii~i~iiiiii~i~iiii~:~:.:...:::i~ii~i~ii?iii~i~i~i~i]~~ iiiii][ residences in the City is $113,278, up from $75,351 in 1980. The average number of rooms ~~iiiii~i!~i!i~ili~ in an owner occupied structure is 5.4, with an ~iiiiiiiiii!ilili~il}~~ ~ii!ii~iiiiiiiiiiiiii average of 2.5 persons per unit. ! ~i~iiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii!iii!i~~~ii~ii~ii~ii!iiiiiiii!ii!iii Median rent in 1990 was $416, with 25 % of' rental households paying $304 or less and 25% paying $513 or more. The bulk of all renters, 50%, pay between $305 and $514 per month. Rental payments do not include monthly utilities such as power and telephone. The mean number of rooms in a rental unit is 3.9, with an average of 2.46 persons per unit. The values and rents reported in the Census reflect all units, not just those which may be available on the market. 1.05.04 Number of persons overpaying for housing Mendocino County -- and by extension the City of Ukiah -- has a unique combination of high- paying industrial sector positions and lower-paying service sector jobs. This combined with a large number of single parent households result in a number of households paying more than is considered appropriate for housing. Generally, a household paying more than twenty-five percent of its income for housing is considered a household "over-paying" for housing. While homeowners with two incomes within the median or above-median category typically do "overpay" for mortgages, the more income a family has the better its ability to handle more than twenty-five percent of income for shelter. In the low and very-low income categories, high housing costs may be the difference between being able to nutritiously feed a family. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 14 In the 1990 Census Data provided by the HCD, 1,786 lower income households (earning 80% of median income or less) were paying more than a quarter of their income for housing. These households represent more than three-quarters of all lower income households. 1,424 of the households overpaying are renters -- representing 85 % of all lower income renters. The remaining 362 overpaying households are home owners. This latter group is 54 % of all lower income home owners. 1.05.05 Number of Overcrowded Households By definition, a housing unit is "overcrowded" if it has more than one person per room (of all rooms in a home, not just bedrooms). Overcrowding is an indication of high housing costs, low average incomes, limited supply of housing or a combination of all of these factors. The number of units which are over- crowded has varied from 227 in 1970 and 164 in 1980 to 381 units in 1990. Overcrowded units in 1990 represent 6.5 % of all housing units, approximately the same percentage as in 1970. There are substantially Table VI. 1-8: Poverty level by household income and family size Very Low 11,600 Moderate 27,900 31,900 13,300 14,950 16,600 17,950 19,250 20,600 Lower 18,600 21,250 2,390 26,550 28,700 30,800 32,950 Median 23,250 26,550 29,900 33,200 35,850 38,500 41,150 35,850 37,950 43,050 46,250 49,400 more "overcrowded" rental units -- 283 than the 98 owner-occupied overcrowded units.6 1.05.06 Condition of housing In 1985, a formal "Survey of Housing Conditions" was performed. The survey identified housing units as being either structurally sound, in need of minor repair, in need of major repair, or beyond repair. These data were supplemented in early 1995 by estimates and information provided by area insurance agents and builders. The central and northwest portions of the City contain the greatest percentage of housing units in need of rehabilitation or demolition. This area of substandard housing is primarily located within the Redevelopment Area. It may it may qualify for tax increment funding for improvements. According to staff at the Mendocino County Community Development Commission, the 1985 survey results are still valid; housing conditions have not changed markedly since 1985. An informal 1994 windshield inspection of areas in which there was housing in need of improvement during the 1985 survey finds that conditions are generally the same as 1985. This is a result of a combination of some homes being rehabilitated or repaired, other homes being converted to owner- occupancy and being improved by the new owners, and some homes that were "acceptable" in 1985 now falling into a "needs repair category." Based on the sampling of the areas, and allowing for a pending abatement proceeding against four homes, the City has an estimated 750 homes in need of minor repair. 61990 Census Summary Tape File lA. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah l~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.I.' 'Housing ~, Page 15 It is projected that there are less than 350 in need of major repair. These numbers are higher than another method of projecting units in need of repair, which assumes that the 639 units built before 1940 are in need of some form of rehabilitation.7 When the abatement proceedings are completed, there are 11 units in the City. This latter number is based on the nine of demolition permits issued since the 1990 Census, the four potentially abated units, and an estimate of the number of "in need of major repair" structures from 1985 that have drifted into the beyond repair category. The City has applied for a Community Development Block Grant which can be used to update its housing condition survey. The results of the pending application were not available at the time the Draft General Plan was approved by the City of Ukiah Planning Commission. f.06 Inventory of land suitable for residential development providing opportunities for new housing development -- in addition to compiling statistical data available from diverse sources -- is an objective of the Housing Element. The City compiled a complete inventory of all undeveloped parcels within the incorporated limits which have the potential of being developed for residential uses. The following three tables provide this information. Table VI. 1-10 is a summary of the land use inventory in a format that matches the review sheets for the Department of Housing and Community Development. Table VI. 1-11 is an actual inventory of undeveloped residential parcels compiled in 1994. Table VI. 1-12 is an inventory of non-residential properties. Table VI. 1-9: Summary table of Vacant land within the City limits suitable and zoned for residential use Single family Multiple family Mobile homes Emergency shelter and transitional housing Low Med-Low Med High High Low Med-Low Any zone other than Industrial 195.43 66.87 Based on application All available 1-5 6-7 8-14 15-28 1-5 6-7 N/A Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate 2.51 2.51 2.51 N/A 71990 Census, STF 3A. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California ~/I.1. Housing 4, Page 1'6 Sites with residential development potential during the life of the Element All identified lots All available 1-28 Adequate 2.51 Currently non-residential 38.32 1-28 Adequate 2.51 Other 11.08 1-28 Adequate 2.51 Total 311.70 Table VI, 1-10: Inventory of undevelo residential uses 2.51 oed land within the City of Ukiah suitable and zoned for oo 1-490-94 3,000 MLD 001-470-59 6,050 MLD I I duplex ok 001-470-61 9,100 MLD 2 I duplex ok 001-470-62 9,600 MLD 2 2 duplex ok 001-470-63 5,000 MLD 1 1 duplex ok 001-470-64 4,800 MLD 1 1 duplex ok 001-470-66 3,500 MLD 1 1 duplex ok 001-470-67 3,500 MLD 1 I duplex ok 001-470-68 5,000 MLD I 1 duplex ok 001-470-69 4,400 MLD 1 1 duplex ok 001-470-70 5,500 MLD 1 1 duplex ok 001-470-56 4,400 MLD I I duplex ok 001-440-09 30,600 LDR/HS 2 1 001-440-10 9,000 LDR 1 1 001-440-08 7,600 LDR 1 1 001-440-06 8,000 LDR 1 1 001-410-16 82,500 LDR 9 2 001-410-18 75,500 LDR 9 2 001-410-20 68,750 LDR 8 2 001-410-29 11,000 LDR 1 1 001-410-35 15,225 LDR 2 1 001-410-36 17,425 LDR 2 1 001-430-25 56,000 MHD 18 10 multi-family 001-430-24 6,600 MLD 1 1 multi-family 001-060-44 19,375 M LD 3 3 001-060-4,5 0 MLD 0 0 8This list does not include any inventory of lands outside the City limits as of May 6, 1995. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.I. Housing 4, Page 17 001-082-36 3,025 MLD 1 1 001-082-37 5,400 MLD I 1 001-082-42 2,500 MLD I 1 001-071-19 6,300 MLD I 1 001-072-44 4,250 MLD I 1 001-113-22 MLD 2 2 14,000 001-113-25 42,750 MLD 7 6 001-112-26 6,300 MLD I 1 001-030-03 1,193,544 HS 1 I slopes 001-030-05 1,459,600 H$ 1 I slopes 001-040-01 1,562,500 H$ 1 I slopes 001-040-04 1,902,265 HS 1 I 389,962 001-040-14 LDR/HS slopes 1 001-040-29 227,383 HS I I slopes 001-040-55 84,942 LDPJHS 5 1 001-120-34 72,000 OS open space 001-120-02 117,612 HS 1 1 slopes 001-120-29 21,000 HS 1 1 slopes 001-130-29 90,000 LDR 10 2 001-130-36 8,500 LDR 1 1 001-130-37 7,225 LDR 1 1 001-130-38 6,400 LDR I 1 001-130-39 LDR 1 1 001-130-40 LDR 1 1 001-130-41 001-130-42 7,200 3,000 4,500 LDR 15,400 LDR 001-130-43 001-130-44 001-130-45 001-130-46 001-130-47 001-130-48 001-130-49 001-130-50 001-142-27 001-142-28 001-142-18 001-142-39 001-142-40 24,000 j LDRr 13,600 15,000 15,000 36,000 15,000 17,500 9,900 8,400 34,000 7,800 55,350 LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR MLD MLD MLD MLD MLD 001-151-16 5,000 MLD 1 1 001-151-14 6,375 MLD 1 1 001-141-30 34,200 MLD 5 5 AdoRed by the Ci~ Council: Novem~r, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 18 001-160-08 31,050 LDR 4 1 001-171,-02 92,500 MLD 15 13 001-171-06 7,500 MLD 1 1 001-181-17 10,000 MLD 2 2 001-183-10 15,000 MLD 2 2 001-203-31 65,500 MLD 11 9 001-203-34 14,400 MLD 2 2 001-240-08 001-230-08 001-242-18 42,938 341,510 3,600 12,100 001-243-05 LDR LDR/HS MLD MLD 2 2~ 001-252-47 8,000 MLD 2 1 001-253-23 20,250 MLD 3 3 001-271-16 7,150 MLD 1 1 001-271-18 2,000 LDR 1 1 001-275-10 7,125 MLD 1 1 001-283-25 10,000 MLD 2 2 001-291-29 14,000 MLD 2 2 multi-~mily 001-292-14 6,300 MLD 1 1 multi-~mily 001-304-02 9,100 HDR 6 3 001-321-25 39,000 MHD 13 7 001-420-14 363,250 HS 1 1 slopes 001-323-13 7,150 MHD 2 2 002-093-03 7,500 MHD 2 2 duplex 002-080-42 7,200 MLD I 1 002-111-31 20,600 MLD 3 3 002-114-59 5,000 MLD I 1 002-102-03 15,000 HDR 10 5 002-153-14 5,400 HDR 3 2 002-146-37 10,200 MLD duplex 2 2 002-281-02 14,375 HDR 9 5 002-281-14 13,650 HDR 9 5 002-281-15 13,650 HDR 9 5 002-302-37 7,000 MHD 2 2 duplex 002-311-04 2,700 HDR 2 1 002-311-10 72,000 HDR 46 25 multi-family 002-311-15 82,925 HDR 53 29 003-010-36 [Portion] 41,578 HS 0 0 003-010-36 [Portion] 62,375 MLD 10 9 003-010-37 [Portion] 55,250 MLD 9 8 003-010-37 [Portion] 003-021-23 65,000 HS MLD 19,000 Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 19 003-021-24 003-030-47 5,000 6,000 MLD MLD I 1 003-030-48 5,000 MLD I 1 003-030-49 7,000 MLD 1 1 003-030-50 6,000 MLD 1 1 003-030-67 3,000 MHD I I multi-~mily 003-030-68 3,900 MHD I 1 multi-~mily 003-040-30 142,441 HDR 92 49 multi-~mily~f 003-050-33 6,300 HDR 4 2 003-061-25 20,000 MLD 3 3 003-100-22 36,000 MHD 12 7 003-110-56 16,500! MLD 3 2 003-110-59 15,400 MLD 2 2 003-110-63 40,000 MLD 6 6 003-110-64 102,366 MLD 003-130-67 10,500 MHD 003-471-13 22,400 HDR 003-471-22 13,125 MHD 003-471-23 13,125 MHD 16 14 3 2 multi-family 14 8 4 2 4 2 003-471-24 13,125 MHD 4 2 003-471-25 13,125 MHD 4 2 003-260-01 199,940 MLD 32 28 003-520-55 6,000 MLD 1 1 003-520-56 6,600 MLD 1, 1 003-520-19 3,900 MLD I 1 003-530-24 113,256 HDR 73 39 multi-family 003-530-23 803,682 HDR 517 277 multi-family 003-550-71 15,000 MLD 2 2 003-550-72 20,000 MLD 3 3 003-550-73 19,150 MLD 3 3 003-590-01 6,000 MHD 1 1 multi-family 003-590-03 6,000 MHD 1 1 multi-family 003-590-04 6,000 MHD 1 1 multi-family 003-590-05 6,000 MHD 1 1 multi-family 003-590-06 6,000 MHD 1 I multi-family 003-590-07 6,000 MHD I 1 multi-family 003-590-08 6,000 MHD I I multi-family 003-590-10 6,000 MHD I I multi-family 003-590-11 6,000 MHD 1 I multi-family 003-590-12 6,000 MHD 1 1 multi-family 003-582-11 2,000 MHD 1 1 003-582-13 2,000 MHD 1 1 Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program vI.i. Housing ~, Page 20 City of Ukiah ~1, Mendocino County, California Abbreviations: LDR -- Low Density Residential, 1-5 dwellings/acm. MLD -- Medium Density Residential, 6-7 dwellings/acre. MHD- Medium High Density Residential, 8-14 dwellings/acm. HDR -- High Density Residential, 15-28 dwellings/acre. HS ~ Hillside Development, no development assumed. General Plan densities taken as net densities. 'Buildout one assumes maximum density. · bBuildout two assumes minimum density under General Plan. Roads assumed at 15% of gross land area when development would result in 33 or more units. Table VI. 1-11: Parcels with residential potential currently designated for commercial use9 002-040-14 002-01 O-06 002-010-08 002-030-06 002-040-35 48,000 48,000 9,750 60,800 20,000 10 multi-family multi-family 002-040-36 20,000 3 multi-family 002-093-04 9,900 2 multi-family 002-121-08 6,600 1 002-122-01 6,750 1 002-146-15 5,400 I multi-family 002-146-35 6,500 I multi-family 002-153-27 5,000 1 002-153-32 4,500 1 002-146-36 6,000 1 002-193-16 13,500 2 002-200-39 15,000 2 002-200-40 7,500 1 002-175-06 12,500 2 002-182-19 9,600 9This list does not include any inventory of lands outside the City limits as of May 6, 1995. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 002-186-02 7,225 002-186-19 13,300 2 multi-~mily 002-217-06 21,000 3 002-218-02 6,200 1 002-218-07 4,250 1 002-232-03 15,375 2 002-232-04 3,250 1 002-247-06 104,544 17 002-247-04 84,070 14 002-262-05 17,000 3 002-271-01 11,500 002-271-02 5,500 1 002-271-03 12,600 2 multi-family 002-273-11 5,000 1 duplex 002-273-13 7,700 1 duplex 002-282-01 152,024 24 multi-family 002-282-18 16,000 3 002-282-19 28,000 4 002-282-05 5,600 1 duplex 002-290-01 7,500 1 duplex 002-290-43 12,000 2 duplex 002-290-44 12,000 2 duplex 002-290-45 12,000 2 duplex 002-290-46 12,000 2 duplex 002-334-71 14,400 2 002-340-28 24,000 4 multi-family 002-340-29 24,000 4 multi-family 002-340-31 160,300 26 multi-family 002-340-32 96,268 15 multi-family 002-340-33 104,108 17 multi-family 002-340-24 14,300 2 multi-family 003-030-75 18,000 3 multi-family 003-030-76 6,900 I multi-family 003-040-41 50,000 8 multi-family/sf 003-083-06 7,700 1 003-130-11 7,500 I multi-family 003-472-02 7,475 1 multi-family 003-472-05 9,000 I multi-family 003-472-06 33,000 5 multi-family 003-530-14 18,450 3 179-062-26 22,500 4 180-030-08 84,000 13 180-030-18 76,200 12 Adopted by the Ci~ Council: November, 1995 multi-family VI.1. Housing ~, Page 21 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 22 NOTE: Development calculated at 7 dwellings per acre. 001-470-53 41,818 P 001-060-34 9,250 P 001-060-36 11,200 P 002-010-01 307,534 P 002-281-27 112,820 P Although housing and construction needs are discussed more specifically in later sections of this element, the City has adequate infrastructure planned for construction during the next five years to accommodate its regional fair share housing need. Additionally, the City is able to accommodate its fair share without needing to annex new territory. 1.07 Housing affordability Table VI.5-26 identifies the value of owner occupied residences. Information was collected through the Census with individuals reporting what was believed in 1989 to be the value of the home. The value reported may or may not be what could be expected for a sales price if the unit were sold. A high housing value does not necessarily mean that housing costs are high also. Persons who have owned a home for a long period of time, or those who were able to afford a large down payment, will have proportionally lower housing costs. Housing value and housing costs apply to all units in the housing stock. However, households trying to buy a house are limited to those units which are for sale. Units available on the market at any one time may not include any of the more affordable units. The ability to afford a median priced home in Ukiah in 1991 would require an income in excess of $44,000 per year. As noted on Table VI.5-27 less than 18% of the City's households have sufficient Table V1. I-12: Monthly Rent incomes to qualify for this home. California's Department of of Housing Units Housing and Community Development reports that 54 percent of all families are overpaying monthly shelter costs; 85 % of low income families are overpaying. $ <= 250 458 $1,000 + 16.3 $250 - 499 1603 57.0 $500- 749 675 24.0 $750- 999 70 2.5 6 According to guidelines which are prepared by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and used by many mortgage lending institutions nation-wide, households should target to spend a range from 25 to 35 percent of their gross income for rent, utilities, property taxes, and insurance. The percentage of households overpaying for housing can be estimated by comparing the income profile of city residents against the price data from the Mendocino County Board of Realtors and value information of the housing units derived from the Census. Mendocino County estimated in 1985 that approximately 51% of low income and 39 % of moderate income homeowners were spending in excess of 25 % of their income Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah il[I, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 23 for housing. Approximately 59% of low income and 65 % of the moderate income renters were spending in excess of 25 % of their income for housing, l0 The cost of building a typical "suburban" style home is in the $32,000-$36,000 range for "sweat equity" homes and $40,000-$45,000 for a "standard" home. A home with "upgrades" can be constructed in the $50,000-$55,000 range. A sweat equity home is one where the property owner provides the labor and pays for materials and site preparation and some special or complex construction work. A standard home meets FHA minimums with some extras or modest upgrades. A home with upgrades means one where the quality of materials, trim, and amenities are higher than a typical home. These prices do not include the cost of land. 1.07.01 Assisted housing inventory There is a total of 775 units in the assisted housing inventory. Assisted units include those with (1) federally subsidized financing at below market interest rates for construction from sources such as the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Farmer's Home Administration (FmHA); (2) units owned and operated by a non-profit or governmental agency, such as the Ford Street Project or the Community Development Commission of Mendocino County; and (3) units with Section 8 vouchers (Federally subsidized rent vouchers).ll When the federal government participates in the financing of residential construction or subsidizing of rents, it is for a specific period of time established by contract. A contract is drafted which stipulates the number of years the financed project must remain affordable. Once the HUD contracts expire, the property owner may convert the units to market rate, and they will be lost from the assisted inventory and inventory of affordable units. Units for which the term is about to expire are defined as units "at risk.' None of the units in the assisted units inventory are "at risk." Orchard Manor's FmHA financing was renewed in April of 1994. However, it should be noted that Orchard Manor does have units which are under Section 8 contracts which are tied to the project and cannot be moved with the tenants. Such Section 8 contracts are set for a number of years ranging from five to forty. Many of the contracts permit owners to opt out after every five years. If the owners decide to quit the program the tenants living in those units would lose their rental assistance. 1.08 Special groups needs assessment Mendocino County prepared a Housing Assistance Plan in 1985 which was supplemented in the County's 1993 Housing Element. It is estimated that of all lower income households in need of assistance, 31% were elderly or handicapped, 53 % were headed by single women and 16 % were large families. ~2 These are the most recent data available for the City. l°City of Ukiah. Report on the Redevelopment Plan. 1989. p 17. ~Mendocino Community Development Commission. 12City of Ukiah. Report on the Redevelopment Plan. 1989. p 17. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 24 Table V1.1-13: Assisted units inventory 425 E. Gobbi St. (J) (1) 05/29/99 -" 'i n - 92 Ukiah, CA 95482 LMSA/RAPV/ 04/26/201-6~e!~1'~u Total ~ (707) 462-5550 CONV ' assisted ~ units=92 / WalnutVillage - . _ ~88 / 1240 N. Pine Street HUD §202 4/10/99 - Section u Total ~ Ukiah, CA 95482 New Construction 07/20/2019 - HUD . . , ~ (707) 468-9672 as,s. ms[ea ~ units=48 i ~ Orchard Manor , 61 New . 0 N Orchard ..... ' .... Construction FmHA 04/2014 42 uK~an, L;A 954UZ .... /_ '- I (707) 468-5810 Oblb ~ J Orchard Village New 548 Ford , , Construction FmHA 11/18/2001 - Section 8 . 48 uKiah, CA 95482 _ . , -- m (707) 468-0669 §515/8 j Holden Street Apartments Holden at Dora Street HUD §202 02/10/2003 - Section 8 6 ~ Ukiah, CA 95482 New Construction 06/22/2023 (702) 468-9672 Creekside Village 44 237 E. Gobbi St. HUD §202 06/09/2003- Section 8 Tott01 I Ukiah, CA 95482 New Construction 05/13/2023- HUD . . , 4 i90 HUD I TOTAL: 266 Section 8 J Abbreviations: Il HUD: Housing and Urban Development j j FmHA: Farmers Home Administration. J J LMSA/RAPV/CONV: Loan Management 8et Aside, converted from an earlier Rental Assistance Payment Il Contract. . Il Sources: California Coalition for Rural Housing Pro]ecl. Inventory of Federally Subsidized Low-Income Renlal J J Units, 1990 Update". March 1, 1990. Il State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development. Revised Housing Element Amendment Date, Preserving Subsidized Housin~ Projects. 1991 ..................................... !1 1.08.01 Disabled According to 1990 Census data approximately two percent of Ukiah's population, 311 people, between the ages of 16 and 64 are expected to have a mobility or self care limitation. Approximately seven Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Uklah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 25 percent of the population (1,160 people) are estimated to have a work disability or a mobility or self care limitation. Among persons 65 and older, approximately 40% are estimated to have a work disability and/or a mobility or self care limitation. Some of the housing problems experienced by disabled individuals include lack of affordable housing, initial move-in expenses, social stigma, and lack of support services. For disabled persons, the most significant need is affordable housing which is also accessible. Some efforts have been made to address the housing and support needs of disabled individuals through various agencies such as Mendocino County Aids Volunteer Network, Mendocino County Departments of Social Services, Mental Health, and Public Health, Ford Street Project, Ukiah Valley Association for the Handicapped, and Families United.'3 The City has been supportive of many of these groups through both f'mancial and in-kind assistance. The Ukiah Valley Association for the Handicapped (UVAH) has two service programs which are available to developmentally disabled individuals age 18 and older. One program has a vocational orientation, while the other focuses on community integration skills for severely disabled persons. Current enrollment in these programs is 122 persons.TM 1.08.02 Elderly The number of elderly persons~5 in the community has remained constant at 15 % from 1980 to 1990. Elderly persons make up 26 % of all households in the city, and 49 % of all single person households. There are 978 elderly owner-occupied housing units and 447 elderly rental-occupied housing units in the City. The City has several programs in place to assist the elderly. These programs range from rehabilitation assistance and energy conservation programs from the City's redevelopment funds to housing designed for the elderly. The Bush Street apartments provides all of its more than 100 units for the elderly. In addition, Ukiah offers second dwelling units in single family zones, which provide additional rental opportunities for the elderly. 1.08.03 Large households There were 536 households in 1990 with five or more persons representing approximately 10% of all households. Large households are most in need of affordable housing units with four or more bedrooms. 253 of these households were owners and the remaining 283 housing units were renters. The City has no programs designed to match large families with housing units. 1.08.04 Farm workers The total number of farmworkers in Mendocino County fluctuates between 80 in November and 2,450 in August, with the number of seasonal workers fluctuating between zero in November and 2,220 '3Mendocino County Department of Planning and Building Services. Mendocino County General Plan Housing Element Technical Appendix, April, 1993. InRoy Smith, Executive Director of the Ukiah Valley Association for the Handicapped, September, 1993. ~SThe California Department of Housing and Urban Development defines "elderly" as persons age '65 and over. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 26 in August.~6 For the City of Ukiah, Census data reports that 2% of the population are employed in agriculture, forestry, and fisheries. Most of the agricultural activity occurs in the unincorporated areas surrounding the City. Harvest time workers are mostly single men with short term housing needs. The Census reports that there are only 259 persons within the City who are employed in the agriculture, timber, and fisheries industries. Farmworker housing within the City is integrated with other low-income family needs. 1.08.05 Female head of family Single mothers with children represent 566 of the City's 2,100 family households with children. Single mothers with children have a high need for affordable housing. Many work at low wage positions in the service or retail sectors in order to support their families. This results in an allocation of a sizable portion of their income for child care. This leaves less income to be spent for housing. Encouraging higher wage positions or affordable child care facilities would help female-headed households meet their housing needs. Affordable housing options for this target group may include multifamily rental housing, homeownership opportunities, and homesharing programs. There presently are no funds available to produce new low-income family-oriented units to meet this housing need. 1.08.06 Homeless persons A study of homelessness was commissioned by the City of Ukiah to be used as an educational tool, for assessing the housing and related needs of the homeless people in the Ukiah area, and as a tool to be used in planning to address those needs. It was conducted by Kiichli & Associates and was adopted by the City of Ukiah in August of 1994. This study is incorporated into the Housing Element by reference. Section 1.08.06 is extracted from the Kiichli report. The Kiichli study provides: counts of the number of homeless people in the area; an analysis of the issues that cause or contribute to homelessness; an exploration of the immediate and longer term needs of homeless people; an analysis of the services and resources that are available in the Ukiah area to address those needs (Appendix 1 of the Kiichli report provides a detailed listing); an analysis of the availability and accessibility of housing for this population; an examination of the gaps in services and housing opportunities that exist; and recommendations for the role the City might play in addressing the needs. There are many avenues through which the City of Ukiah can work to reduce homelessness in this community, including supporting and encouraging the development of affordable housing, taking a leadership role in encouraging economic development and employment and training opportunities and supporting local service providing agencies in their efforts to develop a comprehensive continuum of care in this community. The task is large, but the need is clear. The information and recommendations in this study provide a basis for a caring and effective City and community response to homelessness in the Ukiah area. The following is a profile of homelessness in the Ukiah Area: There were more than 1,120 homeless households (2,044 people) in the Ukiah area during 1993 (Kiichli report page 11). ~6Mendocino County Department of Planning and Building Services. Mendocino County General Plan Housing Element Technical Appendix, 1993. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 27 There are 12,580 households (34,785 people) residing in the Ukiah area (Ukiah and surrounding area, including Calpella, Redwood Valley, Talmage, Hopland) (Kiichli report page 4). The homeless people represent 5.9 percent of the total population (Kiichli report page 13). An estimated 622 households in the Ukiah area are homeless on any given night (Kiichli report page 13). Twenty-six percent (26%) of the population in the Ukiah area are receiving some form of public assistance (5,381 households with 9,048 people) (Kiichli report page 7). Almost 40% of the households in the Ukiah area are renters as opposed to homeowners (Kiichli report page 66). Eighty percent (80%) of the households in the Ukiah area with incomes below $20,000 are overpaying (paying more than 30 % of their income) for rent (Kiichli report page 72). In 1990, the vacancy rate for rentals in the Ukiah area was 1.6% (Kiichli report page 67). To house the homeless households in the Ukiah area there would need to be at least 535 additional affordable housing units (not counting units needing to be replaced) (Kiichli report page 63). Between 30 and 35 % of the homeless people in the Ukiah area are suffering from mental illness. There are virtually no mental health services (therapy or counseling) available for homeless people (see Kiichli report page 43). Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year in public funds are being spent sheltering and housing people in residential motels which are not connected services (Kiichli report page 81). There is a strong network of emergency services in the Ukiah area, which is supported by the local community (Kiichli report page 33). There is no comprehensive, integrated system of care aimed at addressing the problems underlying the homeless Ness in the Ukiah area (Kiichli report page 61). 1.08.07 Persons at risk of homelessness Persons and households who require public assistance to meet their basic requirements for food and shelter are considered at risk of becoming homeless. These individuals are in a precarious financial situation and are most likely to lose their housing as a result of medical problems, divorce, domestic violence, or inability to pay. The Mendocino County Department of Social Services reports that as of September 1991, there were 925 Ukiah area families receiving aid through the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program (AFDC). Of these, 102 of those families were unemployed, 823 other family groups were employed and earning below the poverty level. Qualification for AFDC is determined by income and family size. The maximum payment for a family of three is $663 per month, $7,956 per year. Persons earning more than the threshold do not qualify for relief. A total of 3,069 AFDC, Food Stamps, and MediCal cases were on the County Welfare rolls for Ukiah area households as of September 1991. These cases do not all represent discrete households, as individuals may receive more than one type of aid. They do, however, paint a picture of need in the Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 28 community. Under HUD guidelines, a family of three receiving $7,956 per year, should not spend more than $198 per month for rent and utilities. The race of persons receiving AFDC has been compared to that race's representation in the popu- lation as a whole to demonstrate whether poverty is "color blind." On the basis of statistical probability, fewer Whites and Asians are living in poverty. Native Americans have a disproportionately high poverty level. 17 Families receiving public assistance are among the most impoverished in the community. If these households were given preferential access to the 448 units of assisted housing in the community, 375 of these households would still require assistance. In other words, a minimum of 375 additional units are needed in the assisted inventory. This does not include elderly, physically disabled persons on Social Security and SSI, the working poor or other low income persons. A second group at risk of becoming homeless are those facing the threat of eviction from their residence. The Mendocino County Municipal Court received an average of 23 unlawful detainer notices (tenants must vacate premises) per month for the Ukiah area in Fiscal Year 1991. A total of 160 notices had been filed between January 1 and July 17, 1991. More than 50 of these notices in 1991 resulted in evictions. 18 · 1.08.08 Siting criteria for homeless facilities Homeless facilities can be grouped into two categories: transitional and emergency. Transitional facilities are those where the program objective is to provide a residential setting for up to six persons residing in the facility. These facilities can be a converted single family residence or have the appearance of a single family residence. Emergency facilities are designed to provide services on an immediate need basis. Some larger facilities may offer support services such as counseling or job placement. Transitional facilities may be appropriate within existing residential neighborhoods, because the use of the facility is the same as a home. The emergency facilities may be sited in areas near services. Housing for the homeless is permitted in all residential zones. The City has no special constraints that would block the use or development of a home as a homeless shelter. The types of units may have restrictions. For example, housing up to six homeless persons would be considered acceptable within a single family district. To provide multiple housing opportunities for families, the homeless shelter may need to locate within a multi-family district. In many cases, a use permit may be sought to allow a shelter in zones where the use is not permitted outright. ~7Mendocino County Welfare Department Case Information. ~SMendocino Municipal Court, Mount San Hedrin District, Case Records. Mike Foss, State of California Judicial Council, telephone interview. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 29 Table VI. 1-14: Approved projects Single family units; variances and relaxed setback standards approved. Priced at Cagle 14 3.20 4.38 Moderate and above (80%+ median income qualifying). 27 single family (5+ units per acre); 113 multi- family units (24± units per acre). Approved Plan- ned Unit Development for relaxed development standards to facilitate affordable development. Mayfield/Harris 140 14.50 9.66 Priced at Iow-moderate and moderate (50-120% !of median income qualifying). There is a mix of apartments at varying rents for varying incomes. The number of units per income group are not available. Park West 26 5.82 4.47 Single family condominium units for above moderate income households Single family for above moderate income Torn Hill 6 3.05 1.97 households. Approved Planned Unit Develop- ment for relaxed development standards. Single family homes. Approved Planned Unit Development for relaxed development standards C/eve/and Lane 15 2.20 6.82 to facilitate affordable development. Priced to be affordable for families earning Iow-moderate incomes 60-80% median income). This is a RCHDC sweat equity project. RCHDC sweat equity single family homes with Marlene Estates 104 9.00 11.56 special reduced development standards. Priced at below moderate. Total 305 37.77 8.08 1.09 Housing needs plan 1.09.01 Building permit activity Building permit activity in the City fluctuates with economic conditions. The annual average number of residential building permits issued in the city between 1970-1990 is 105. Building permits for residences have reached as many as 142 per year. Overall, the period of 1985-1990 showed strong construction growth with an average of 129 permits issued per year. ~9 Ukiah has a number of residential projects which have secured all of the necessary discretionary approvals, but have not yet submitted applications for building permits. These projects are titled the "approved but not built" and are a good indication of future building permit activity. ~9City of Ukiah. Housing Elem~rlt. Commission dated April 2, 1991. 1986 Table V. City of Ukiah. Memorandum to Planning Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 30 1.09.02 Housing production goals Ukiah is unique in that most of the property available for residential use would qualify as "in-fill". The vacant properties are scattered all over town and parcel sizes do not lend themselves to large scale development. The average parcel size of an undeveloped residential parcel is 1.68 acres, suitable for ten dwellings in a single family context or a small multi-family development.2° The Mendocino Council of Governments prepared a Housing Needs Plan in 1991 for all of the cities and unincorporated area of Mendocino County. This assignment of housing units needed is sometimes called the "fair share" allocation. The Housing Needs Plan establishes the number of housing units which need to be constructed in the city to accommodate expected increases in population. A second aspect of the fair share allocation is that it sets goals for the affordability of units and the numbers of units produced which will be affordable to different income groups.2~ Residential housing needs set by the Council of Governments for the incorporated City of Ukiah is 775 units to reflect both the new housing need and an offset for the number which may be converted to a non residential use, demolished, or otherwise removed from the housing stock. Meeting these goals will Table VI. 1-15: Affordable housing type, density, and land needs for the City of Ukiah during the short-term planning period Very Iow Low Moderate Above moderate 394 36,000 394 42,000 473 52,000 571 55,000 866 1,011 945 1,103 100,000 120,000 Greater than m- oderate housing 12-18 units 16 average 7-11 units 9 average 4-6 units 5 average Less than 4 units/acre 2.5 average Multi-family Mfg housing Mobile homes Mobile home pk Mfg housing Multi-family Duplex Single family Duplex to fourplex Mobile home park Condominium or townhome Single family Duplex Condominium or townhome 217 108 140 310 22 28 62 14 acres 12 acres 28 acres 124 acres ........ . .............. :, .:.:.:.:.:.:..,: .............. ....,.........:,:.:.: Table generated in concept and original data by the Mendocino County Department of Planning and Building Services, Mendocino County Housing Element Technical Appendix Table 9.1-3, 1993. This table reflects the population density and building intensity provided for the Ukiah General Plan Revision and Growth Management Program 1995 update. The number of units per acre are based on the typical averages that have been constructed within the City of Ukiah over the past twenty years. 2°Calculation from Table I. 1-1 by dividing total residential acreage by number of parcels. 2~Mendocino Council of Governments. Housing Needs Plan. June, 1991 Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 31 require an average of 155 residential building permits to be issued per year. This level of construction activity is greater than Ukiah has experienced over the last 20 years. and 1,254 dwelling units at "maximum" before all undeveloped land in the existing City limits is consumed.22 This buildout estimate assumes that the status quo will be main- mined in regards to specific land use designations and their associated density ranges. The range given for buildout reflects development at the minimum and maximum General Plan density range for a particular piece of property. The current inventory can meet growth needs through the year 2006, a Every undeveloped parcel with residential zoning in 1991 was assessed on the basis of parcel size to determine the potential number of residences that could be constructed. Buildout of each parcel within the City of Ukiah identified for residential use on the inventory (Tables VI.5-32 and VI.5-31) will generate between 744 at "low" densities Table VI.'~-'~6: Regional Share Housing Need Targets for Ukiah by Fiscal Year 1997 Very-low income 1,560 Low-income Moderate income Above moderate 1,749 780 874 1,215 1,312 2,6O4 2,629 217 140 310 range within the long-term planning period, assuming growth remains constant at approximately 1.8 % annually and development occurs at the maximum permitted density. If development occurs at the lowest density under the General Plan range, undeveloped land now in the City will accommodate growth through the year 2004, which is the end of the intermediate-term planning period. At the high density range, the City will reach full buildout of undeveloped residential land in twelve years. The City can encourage development plans for undeveloped properties to construct dwellings to the highest permitted density. This is accomplished by establishing minimum densities in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Based on surrounding land use patterns, it would appear that 62 parcels now designated for commercial use on the 1986 land use map may be suitable for residential use. Assuming development at seven dwelling units per acre, these 62 parcels could support 268 dwelling units. Meeting housing targets will require new construction and preservation of the existing stock. The Council of Governments has estimated that 370 units will be removed from the housing stock from 1990 to 1997. This is substantially higher than the fewer than one dozen permits per year the City actually issues for demolitions, and seems to be an unrealistic level. If the City limited the number of conversions or demolitions, their new construction needs would be reduced accordingly. Older housing units represent some of the most affordable housing. Not all units should be saved, such as those that are seriously substandard, or damaged from fire. Some units will be lost through legitimate growth needs of downtown and job centers. The City could use its police power to control the number of units approved for demolition. Each of the units demolished can be tied to construction of affordable housing in another location. New housing could be promoted through 22This list does not include any inventory of lands outside the City limits as of May 6, 1995. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 32 paymem of in lieu fees to a housing trust fund, construction of another unit, or comribution to construction of an existing project to make it more affordable. 1.09.03 Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (L&M Fund) Estimated revenues available through the City of Ukiah Redevelopmem Agency's L&M fund through the end of June 1999 have been projected based on a 7.6 percem increase per year over the fiscal year 1996 - $284,025; 1997 - $351,011; 1998 - $423,131 and 1999 - $500,783. Anticipated L&M Fund expenditures can only be described in very general terms. It is estimated that expenditures will fall under one of three broad categories. Each of the three categories is listed as well as estimated percentage of yearly expenditures for each: New Construction Activities (60%): This may include but is not limited to down paymem assistance; SWEAT equity loans; direct contribution to matching funds for nonprofit agencies. Rehabilitation/Grants (20%): This may include but is not limited to activities such as 100% grams and direct assistance. Special Programs (20%): This may include programs including first/last remal deposit assistance; first- time homebuyer down payment assistance. 1.09.04 Relationship of housing production to rents and prices Ukiah's rental market has generally held steady with the construction and developmem of new housing units for affordable markets. Although there is a shortage of rental housing in the low and low- Table VI. 1-17: Percent rentals in rent ranges moderate price ranges, it is not within the critical range. In a 1994 survey of rental units for the City, Kiichli Associates "Study of Homelessness" found the median gross rent in the City was $496 per month. Table VI.5-37 shows distribution of rental units by monthly rents. Mortgage payments are more widely distributed across the income spectrums. Current mortgage paymems in the City vary significamly depending on how long someone has been in their home and the interest rate. Newly constructed units in Ukiah, idemified in Table VI.5-34 are offered at varying prices. The projects identified as "low" or "low moderate" are priced to have either affordable mortgage payments (including taxes and insurances) or affordable rems. The range of affordability is defined within the Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing 4, Page 33 Housing Element as serving the needs of families in the under 80% (low) and 80%-100% (low-moderate) income ranges. In 1992, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development surveyed available housing units in rental ranges. In the HUD survey, 75 % of the one-bedroom units surveyed were priced in the $200- $450 rental range. This compares with 70 % in the Kiichli study in the $200-$500 range. However, HUD found only 12 % were priced at under $200, while the 1994 data show 15 % of the one bedroom units in that range. For two bedroom units, the 1992 HUD survey found that 73 % were in the mid $300-$500 range, compared with 85 % in the 1994 analysis; 13 % were priced at less than $300 per month, compared to 11% in 1994. Generally, the data analysis shows that the City is holding and slightly increasing affordable rental units for the Iow-moderate and moderate income families (80%-120% of median income). The newly approved units under construction will continue this trend. Housing in the Mayfield Project are priced for apartments at market and below. Vouchers and other management techniques are used to bring the actual net-to-tenant dollars into affordable ranges. The apartments have a less than four percent vacancy rate at any time. Other rent-managed apartments that are intended to serve low-income and moderate income families are listed in Table VI.5-33. Vacancy rates in the high density units within the City are less than two percent. Many units maintain waiting lists of people wanting to move in for the quality of the unit as related to the price charged. Based on census block data, the City's highest concentration of low and low-moderate income families are in the neighborhoods of the City with high density zoning and other subsidized housing. It would be fair to conclude that the low vacancies in the high density areas show that the City is providing housing opportunities with its zoning and land use policy. A survey of rental units in the Las Casas Subdivision, constructed within the last ten years, reveals that the detached single family residential units and duplex units have a range of costs for qualifying renters. The detached three bedroom single family homes range from six to eight hundred dollars per month, a level marginally acceptable for lower income families of three and generally available to a lower income family of four. The three bedroom duplex units range from 500 to 650 dollars per month. Based upon the February, 1995, Mendocino County income limits established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, these units are affordable to lower income families of three and four persons. The Sierra Sunset Village apartment complex located in the Las Casas development contains sixty- eight two bedroom units on approximately three acres. The developers had requested and received the maximum number of units permitted for multi-family residential developments in Ukiah. The administrative record indicates that the developers had not requested density bonus units. The prices are reasonable to lower income families with a range from 450 to 500 dollars per month. In addition, the City recently facilitated the acquisition of a vacant parcel for the Community Development Corporation. The site, adjacent to the northern portion of the Las Casas subdivision, was prezoned for high density development and subsequently annexed into the City. The site contains twelve thousand square feet and can accommodate ten units. The City understands that the Community Development Corporation is in the process of designing a development for the site. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 34 1.09.05 Summary Meeting growth needs over the General Plan planning period may require an increase in the land available for housing or increased efficiency on existing land. Annexation of vacam land suitable for residential use increases land available for housing. Conversion of land now designated or used for non- residemial use for residemial purposes would also increase the supply of land without annexation. Other options include controlling the loss of housing through review of demolition permits, encouraging residemial uses above ground floor in commercial districts, or increasing densities on residemial lands throughout the city. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.I. Housing ~, Page 35 Table VI. 1-18: Major employers in the greater Ukiah area Timberland, hard board products Masonite Corporation 444 animal feed Louisiana-Pacific Corporation 420 Sawmill wood moldings RETECH 134 Vacuum metallurgical furnaces flanges Fetzer Vineyards 250/450* VVinery Carousel Carpet Mill 121 Carpet Parducci Wine Cellars 60/85* Winery Weibel Champagne Vineyards 25/300* Winery Mendocino Brewing Company ** 40 Brewery County of Mendocino 1308 County government Ukiah Unified School District 625 Education Ukiah Valley Medical Center 470 Health services Savings Bank of Mendocino 162 Financial services Walmart 135 Retail sales City of Ukiah 135 City government Pacific Bell 129 Utility Pacific Gas and Electric 90 Utility Mervyns's 90 Retail sales J. C. Penney's I 80 Retail sales Friedman Brothers ** 47 Building material sales * Seasonal ** Under Construction 1. Availability of services and infrastructUre The City adequate public provide sewage disposal, water, has facilities and services tO domestic electricity, and solid waste disposal to its current residents. The sewer and water facilities are slated for upgrades and expansions to meet demands during the five-year planning period. The City is in the process of ensuring that there is adequate sewer and water capacity to meet its needs for the intermediate term planning period. The street system is adequate for the proposed density and intensity of residential units proposed in the Housing Element. There are no constraints on the availability of services and infrastructure. Ongoing and funded improvements to the City's water and sewage disposal Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 36 system ensures there is adequate infrastructure to meet long-term growth requirements beyond the year 2000. f.'l'l Market and inventory conditions 1.11.01 Employment trends Ukiah is the commercial hub for Mendocino County and portions of Lake and Sonoma Counties. Approximately 75,000 people are in the Ukiah market area. The City is located along the Highway 101 corridor making it a convenient stop for business travelers. Major manufacturing employers are in the lumber and agricultural products industries. Table VI-22 lists the major employers in the greater Ukiah area. Unemployment rates in Mendocino County have increased from 7.8% in 1989 to around ten percent in 1993, at a time when unemployment nationally was approximately one half that rate. Although the economic forecast and employment rates do not look good in 1994, Ukiah is positioning itself for growth and economic development in the future. 1.11.02 Governmental constraints Governmental constraints have been pointed out as a key deterrent to production of housing in adequate amounts and within affordable price ranges. Many of these "constraints" -- such as park land dedication requirements, infrastructure requirements, development standards, and delays in processing to allow public input -- are actually community demands for quality housing and living environments. Boards and commissions responding to this input will continue to require that housing developments meet community quality of life standards. 1.11.03 General Plan The bulk of the City's vacant land use inventory is designated Medium Low Density. A substantial portion is designated for High Density. Adequate sites have been designated for residential use to meet the growth needs of the regional fair share plan. The general plan is not viewed as a constraint to housing production goals. Without annexation, the General Plan provides for significant opportunities for residential development -- and the use of mixed use residential and commercial development in non- residential zones. 1.11.04 Zoning Densities Zoning districts are in place to allow development of land at one dwelling unit per acre to 28 dwelling units per acre. Residential zones require a 6,000 square foot minimum lot size for interior lots and 7,000 square feet on comer lots. Existing lots with less than the minimum square footage can be developed upon securing a site development permit or use permit. Creation of new lots less than 6000 square feet is accomplished in the Planned Development Zone. The General Plan calls for a revised Land Development Code to be enacted with certain specific performance standards for new construction -- especially related to multi-family dwellings. The requirements include provisions for design review, minimum landscaping standards, and site development designed for energy conservation and alternate methods of transportation. These performance standards Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing 4, Page 37 have the potential of adding to the cost of new construction. These additional costs may reduce the number of people who qualify for home purchases or result in an increase in base rents in the area. The old zoning and subdivision codes for the City are traditional prescriptive ordinances that provide for uniform development standards meeting minimum requirements. This constrains unique or creative development opportunities for newer housing styles and ownership opportunities that have been generated in recent years. The new General Plan provides for changes in the Land Development Code to move towards performance-based zoning -- an activity that will result in more planned developments and opportunities for co-housing, stock cooperative ownership, and better site planning. The proposed design review program must be developed as a part of the City's new Land Development Code. The Community Design Element of the General Plan addresses the range of issues to be incorporated into the design review regulations. Generally, the program involves a streamlined process so that design review occurs while the site development permits are going through the CEQA and project review process. Design review is to focus on siting standards, ensuring adequate onsite open space for play areas or passive recreation. The objective for design review is strive for neighborhood compatibility rather the style dictates. The City's existing zoning code is to be rewritten entirely. At present, it is not meaningful to present the current ordinance. Upon adoption of the General Plan much of the existing ordinance -- especially portions dealing with parcel size, density, and site development standards -- will become performance or project-specific based. The standards that will be used will vary by project. Standards for parking will be flexible based on requirements to improve opportunities for alternate access and the siting of higher densities adjoining transportation corridors. No policies are required in the Housing Element to institute these performance programs, the measures are called out in the Land Use Element. The City of Ukiah Zoning Code is incorporated by reference. The California Department of Housing and Community Development considers excessive regulation or public review to be a constraint to multi-family housing. The City provides no unusual or unique permitting, hearing, or review standards for multi-family housing. It enforces zoning regulations, requires conformance to the Uniform Building Code, and there are connection fees charged for sewer and water service. The General Plan will add provisions for design review and open the potential for the City to collect impact fees for parks and offsite road improvements. The City has evaluated its normal and routine development review process and has concluded that it does not represent excessive constraints to multi-family housing, and does not jeopardize the integrity of the Vision Statement. Lack of design or performance standards would result in the construction of dwelling units that are likely to not reflect the character and appearance of the neighborhood. If the requirements for park fees are never imposed in the future, the City would be unable to provide park and recreation services to its residents at the same level as is currently delivered. If offsite road improvement impact fees are not collected, the street system would be unable to handle increased traffic. This issue alone will result in a denial of housing projects on streets with substandard levels of service (E or F). California law requires that there be a link between transportation and land use. If a street system is incapable of accommodating additional capacity, no development can be approved that would overburden the street system. There are no proposals to remove these "constraints," because the issues are normal costs associated with development. The City's fees are not exorbitant or an exceptional burden. The City already provides offsets or incentives for affordable housing to offset some of these costs. No further action is needed or feasible. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah/I~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 38 1.11.05 Improvement Standards The City is operating under the Uniform Building Code for building conservation applicable to all buildings constructed prior to 1972. This code relaxes building code standards for older structures. New construction must conform to the Uniform Building Code. The City has no additional building code requirements in addition to the UBC (and its associated codes) or State Building Code requirements (Title 25 Energy Standards). Table VI. 1-19: Utility connections fees 1.11.06 Fees and Exactions Ukiah has not taken advantage of the full range of fees and exactions which have been made available to cities and counties. For example, the City has not adopted a comprehensive traffic impact fee program, sales tax increase, or utility fees for flood control or storm drainage. Tax overrides have been approved for school district needs, and sanitation. Total tax overrides amount to 0.154 dollars per $100 of assessed valuation, or an increase of 1.54 % to the average property tax bill. As a result, Ukiah compares favorably against many other jurisdiction in the opportunity for construction of affordable housing. Ukiah does charge standard building permit fees, in lieu park fees, and connection charges for city operated utilities. Fees and charges for these utilities are shown on Table VI.5-39. The per unit cost for connection charges ranges from $1,995 for a detached single family house, to $1,104 per unit in a ten unit apartment building. The current schedule of fees encourages multi-family development and affordable housing. 1.11.07 Processing and Permit Procedures Residential building permits require no public review. Permits are issued as quickly as plan checks are completed, generally two to three weeks. When a discretionary permit is required, changes in state law have increased the amount of time required for environmental review. In addition, recent case law standards result in an increased need for Environmental Impact Reports (which can take 12 to 15 months to complete). Locally, the City has streamlined this process with policies in the General Plan to reduce the need for lengthy environmental review and establish more uniform design and review standards. These Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 39 shorten the local timeline. The City can review and process a subdivision or use permit application -- without an Environmental Impact Report -- in six to nine weeks. Table VI. 1-20: Development and application fees General Plan Amendments Zoning Changes Major subdivisions Minor subdivisions Site Development Permit Variances (Planning Commission) Variances (Zoning Administrator) Use Permit (Planned Development) iii ii i?~iii i~iiii Apartment valuation (average/sq. ft.) iiii iii iiiiiii~ ii Single family valued < $25,000 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: !?~i~!}i~i~iii~iii~i!?~i~i~i!~i?~i~! Single family valued $25,001-35,000 :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:...,....,....... ~iii~!i~i~iii~i~ii~i~i~ii~ii~!ili~} Single family valued $35,000-40,000 ii~iiiii??~??~!iii~ii?~i~i!~il Single family valued $40,001-45,000 i iii?~ii!~iiiii~iii?~i??~i~i~ii?~i Single family valued $50,001-~0,000 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :i:!:i:i:!:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:!:!:i:!:!:i:!:!:!:i:~ :.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: :.:.:.:.:.:.;.:,:.:.:.:,:.:,;,:.:.:,:.:,:.:,:,:.:.:.:, :i:i:i:i:!:!:i:i:!:i:i:i:i:!:i:i:i:i:i:!:i:!:~:!:i:!:i :i:i:i:i:!:i:!:!:!:i:!:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:!:i:i:i:[:i :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.: Other governmental constraints and opportunities 1.12.01 Inadequate infrastructure or services The open space, parks, recreational facilities are inadequate General Plan determined that and other to accommodate additional residential development in the area bounded by Gobbi, U.S. 101, Talmage and the railroad. In addition, open space in the downtown area is at a premium; the only open spaces currently available are McGarvey Park (1 acre) and Carpenter Park (0.8 acre). The new General Plan implements programs to resolve this issue in the Open Space and Conservation Element and the Parks and Recreation elements. 1.12.02 Opportunities for energy conservation The City of operates and administers electrical service to Ukiah residents, while Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) supplies gas services only to Ukiah homes. There are a number of energy-related assistance programs available in the Ukiah area: REACH (Relief for Energy Assistance through Community Help): Available to City and/or PG&E customers, provides monetary assistance in emergencies to pay bills for heating and electricity. ECIP ( Energy Crisis Intervention Program): Available to City and/or PG&E customers, provides limited financial assistance in emergencies to low-income households to pay overdue bills on utility accounts. EP (Energy Partners): A free PG&E program to weatherize eligible low-income households. EGIA Rebates: PG&E customers can receive rebates after the purchase of certain appliances. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah llJlr, Mendocino County, California, VI.1. Housing ~, Page 40 City of Ukiah Rebate Program: City of Ukiah electrical customers can receive rebates after the purchase of certain appliances. HEAP (Home Energy Assistance Program): A state program which provides a "once a year" credit to a utility account for low-income households. LIHEAP(Low-Income Energy Assistance Program: A state-funded program to provide free weatherization to eligible low-income households. CHEERS (California Home Energy Efficiency Rating System): Nonprofit organization which provides inspection of homes and evaluates energy efficiency, makes recommendations, provides standardized ratings. Farmers Home Preservation Grants: These grants fund replacement of windows, and other moderate rehabilitation activities to reduce energy consumption. Energy consumption can be reduced in housing through orientation of lots to the south and alignment of roads east-west. This option, of course, is only available to new development on large parcels, In an infill situation, the road and lot alignment are already f'med. Higher densities can reduce energy consumption, by limiting the wall surface area per unit exposed to the elements. Active solar energy and weatherization are energy conservation options available for both new and existing units. As with many improvements to housing, energy conservation features will increase the initial cost of construction and sales price or rent but will reduce the month operating costs. 1.12.03 Rural Communities Housing Development Corporation (RCHDC) The RCHDC will sometimes act as a developer of state or federally financed housing programs for lower income households. Projects at the Marlene Subdivision and or Cleveland Lane are recent RCHDC projects. The agency also provides rental management capabilities. RCHDC has also sponsored construction and development of housing which can only be handled by a private, non-profit entity. 1.12.04 Planned Development zoning The purpose of the Planned Development zoning district is to absolve certain property from the requirements of conventional zoning. This provides flexibility for site design to permit a coordinated development. The requirement for making application are that the property owner or developer submit a site plan or development map and proposed development standards regulating the height, yard setbacks, lot coverages, etc. for the property. The fees for proposing a Planned Development are $325.00, and have not changed since 1989. The Planned Development zoning district tool can significantly reduce or eliminate the constraints to siting and design of structures. It also provides for proposing a mixture of housing types and densities, and allows for possible flexibility in other requirements, such as onsite parking In the Las Casas subdivision Planned Development, which is completely built-out, most every comer lot is developed with a duplex structure identical in design with surrounding single family residences, except for its larger size. The development also includes a large apartment complex strategically sited adjacent to both single family residences, a church, and an elementary school. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. HouSing 4, Page 41 There are no obvious or significant constraints to multi-family development inherent in the Planned Development process. The tool is design to provide flexibility and creative design and with user-friendly fees and a streamlined process, to encourage a mix of housing types within development projects. f . 13 Non-governmental constraints The cost of land and construction in the Ukiah area is increasing significantly in response to less available land for development and more pressure for new homes. The City has seen land costs increase to an average of $200,000 per unsubdivided and undeveloped acre for a single family home. The reason for this high cost is that there are few undeveloped single family lots available in "affordable" areas of the City. Most individual lot sales within the City take place in custom home neighborhoods. In-fill smaller lots may be purchased at prices ranging from $75,000 to $120,000 depending on the neighborhood, view, and prices of adjoining existing homes. Generally, in-fill lots are not a solution for affordable single family homes. Nearly all multi-family unit construction in the City is within in-fill lots in multi-family zones. Higher densities cannot generally be mixed into established single family neighborhoods due to State General Plan consistency requirements and local property owners concerns over maintaining homogenous housing-style neighborhoods. The price of the median home in the City declined slightly between 1988 and 1991, but has seen modest increases to $130,000 or more (as an average) over the past two years. The reason for this increase is that the City has had an increase in the number of homes available for low and low-moderate income families and then an increase in the number of custom homes in the over $200,000 category. Fewer homes in the mid-ranges (upper $80s and $90s to low $100s) were sold over the past few years than in the extremes. This impacts the median price. Mortgage money for conventional financing has been affected by a combination of a "run" on refinancing to take advantage of lower interest rates and an increase in housing prices for purchasers that would not qualify for subsidized mortgages. FHA loans have been difficult to obtain because the FHA maximum for Mendocino County was near $15,000 less than the amount needed for a typical home. Mortgage money is available to qualified purchasers. Additional money for persons requiring assistance is available in a number of different programs that are described in the Element. 1.14 Appropriateness of goals, objectives, and policies The City has learned that the previous Housing Element provided substantial concepts and policies but no fn-m implementation. It was adequate to state the desire to achieve, but the Element itself provided no firm program to implement its objectives. The updated element, in matching and being consistent with the overall General Plan, establishes a program of goals, policies, and implementation measures. These measures, which follow the discussions on the next series of pages, are designed to specify when programs will be accomplished, which department is responsible for the programs, and how the measures will be carried out. The Housing Element works in concert with the entire General Plan, and is not a stand-alone component. f . f 5 Wrap-up 1. f S. 00(A) Housing needs Housing are a population growth family Population increases over the needs function of and size. planning period have been projected using information provided by the California Department of Finance and the Mendocino Council of Governments. Ukiah's population is expected to Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 42 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California increase by approximately 256 persons per year to a projected population of 17,159 in the year 2002.23 If the number of persons per household remains the same, building starts will need to average 156 units per year during the short-term planning period to keep up with the demand for regional housing projected by the Mendocino Council of Governments? Undeveloped land is available in the City which can be used to meet the growth needs in the near term. 1.15.01 5 Year strategy Table VI. 1-22: Quantified Objectives Very Low-income 217 50 125 Low-income 108 35 100 Moderate-income 140 25 100 Above Moderate 310 10 100 1.15.01(A) Housing concepts Location and density of new development The location and density of new residential development is shown on the Land Use Map. Density is a numeric expression of the number of dwelling units per acre. Density is often a more important consideration in the service demand of a project and its impact on the neighborhood than the distinction between single family and multi-family uses. Zoning establishes whether the property is developed with multi-family or single family uses. Infill development in residential areas is directed by policy to be compatible with the neighborhood. Protection of existing stable residential areas The largest investment many people will make in their lifetime is for their primary residence. To recognize the material and psychological impact of this investment, it is important for the City to minimize land use activity which is perceived by residents as undesirable in the area. Demolition or conversion of housing stock One of the most important tools in promoting affordable housing is to protect what presently exists. One means of preserving affordable housing is through the control of demolition permits. Sound housing may be demolished to make way for a different use of the land, or a more intense development pattern. Housing is also lost when the unit is converted to a non-residential use. There are examples in the city where older homes have been converted to commercial uses and professional offices. Not all houses should be saved. Those which are in serious disrepair, or damaged by fire may not be economically feasible to rehabilitate. 23California Department of Finance, Population Research Unit and Mendocino Council of Governments, 1991 Housing Needs Study. :4Ibid. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 43 Promotion of affordable housing The first step in promoting affordable housingzs is to preserve what presently exists. The second step is to increase the supply of housing. Increasing the supply of all housing types free up units for new people entering the market or those looking for housing better suited to their needs. The City also needs to encourage housing affordable to entry level home buyers and the very low and Iow income households. Accessory units are another means of promoting affordable housing. They serve a unique niche for persons seeking a single family environment without the associated high rents. Accessory units are generally small, which is reflected in the average rents. Affordable housing for seniors, single person households, or the very low income group can be provided by the private sector when densities are adequate to make economic or investment sense. One option for housing these groups are one and two bedroom apartments. These apartments may be constructed above ground floor in retail districts. The addition of residential uses downtown can increase the vitality of downtown, and support local merchants. This type of housing is more common in large urban areas than in rural communities. The City has demonstrated a willingness to grant appropriate rezones and planned development approvals to both increase the supply of housing and increase the availability of affordable housing. City voters approved participation in the financing of up to one hundred public housing units under an "Article 34" referendum in 1982. Article 34 provides authority to "develop, construct or acquire" public housing as required by the State Constitution. There are 15 units of public housing in the City of Ukiah which were acquired by CDC. There are 21 new construction public housing units planned in the Brookside subdivision by CDC for completion in 1995. Therefore, there is a remaining authority for 64 units. The citizens of Mendocino County have passed every request for Article 34 authority placed on the ballots. 1.15.02 A description of how the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the updated element incorporate what has been learned from the results of the prior element 1. f S. 02(A) Summary of major findings The last version of the Housing Element was prepared to meet State regulatory guidelines and the direction of the Ukiah City Council. Programs believed by the Growth Management Steering Committee to be worthy of continuing and that are also consistent with the General Plan Vision Statement are included in the Housing Element as part of the sections of the Housing Element. The discussion of f'mdings preceding each section of the Housing Element and the introductory provisions of the Housing Element identify issues that have been found to be important by the Housing Element Citizen Advisory Committee, the Growth Management Steering Committee, the general public during the visioning process, Housing Element Workshops, and the General Plan hearing process. Issues identified as important and priorities within the community have been incorporated into the Housing Element. Without exception, participants in the process of developing the Housing Element desired to see a policy program that would actually result in construction of housing and creation of programs designed to serve the real needs of people in the City. Most of the participants, including many representing affordable 25The definition of "affordability,' the basis of determining "affordable housing" is found in the Glossary, Chapter IV on page IV-39. Adopted by the City Council: November. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomia VI.1. Housing ~, Page 44 housing advocacy groups, were disturbed that requirements imposed by the State are not designed to reflect the differences between a rural City like Ukiah and major urban centers and metropolitan areas within the State. In reviewing the needs of the community against the requirements for a Housing Element, it is believed by a majority of those participating in the process that the Housing Element imposed by statute and liberally interpreted through State regulations and guidelines is not in conformance with the needs, goals, and aspirations of the people of Ukiah. 1.15.02(B) Hearing and notice The Growth Management Steering Committee conducted final hearings on the Housing Element at its meeting of August 10, 1994. Additional hearings were then conducted before the Planning Commission and City Council between December, 1994 and June, 1995, with the Council reaching conceptual approval of the entire General Plan, including the Housing Element, on June 10, 1995. The Growth Management Steering Committee spent four meetings in February and March, 1994, covering the Housing Element. Public notices were published for all the meetings, representatives of community housing groups were extended personal notices, and notices were posted at City Hall. 1.15.02(C) General Plan consistency The Housing Element was prepared as part of the complete rewrite of the City of Ukiah General Plan. The goals, policies, and implementing programs in the Housing Element proposed by the Growth Management Steering Committee are consistent with the General Plan. Additional policy requirements imposed by State review and regulation have been modified to ensure internal consistency although in many cases the Growth Management Steering Cominittee opposed these goals --although consistent -- as being at variance with the Vision Statement and overall objectives of the Plan. An explanation of General Plan goals, policies and implementing programs, what the measures mean, and the level of General Plan detai?6 The General Plan's overall vision recognizes that there are many priorities within the City of Ukiah. The vision of the people, as reflected in the Vision Statement (Element III of the Plan), is an attempt to acknowledge the broad interest of the community. It provides a cohesive approach to improving the local quality of life. The goals and policies of the Housing Element support the Vision Statement and are compatible with the regulations guiding its structure and content. Goals are the broad objectives of the Plan that help carry out the Vision Statement. The Vision Statement is the overriding foundation from which the entire Plan is written. Each goal must be consistent with the Vision Statement to represent what the hundreds of community participants desire for the City of UIClah. The policies are in effect the direction of the City Council as to how the Plan is to be carried out. Policies further del'me goals into action programs. The implementation measures are the base for making the Plan work. An implementation measure is not an ordinance, nor is it a specific program. Implementation measures provide direction to another action that needs to be carried out by the City. Implementation measures call for the development of a active program within the timeline of the Plan (short-, intermediate-, and long-term planning periods of 0 to 5, 5-10, and over 10 years respectively). 26This section is provided to explain the relationship of goals, policies, and implementation measures to Housing Element reviewers that may not be reading the complete General Plan in context. This section is to be removed upon final adoption of the Plan because it repeats information from the Introduction. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 45 The measures do not define the program. The reason implementation measures do not detail a program is that once the program is initiated, it must have the flexibility to evolve into something that works for the people of Ukiah. If a program is detailed in the General Plan, the Plan would have to be amended in order to change the program. Variances to General Plan standards are not permitted under California law. Other implementation measures define ongoing review standards. These standards are enacted into City processes by resolutions or ordinances that are prepared after the General Plan is adopted. The programs must be consistent with all elements of the General Plan. 1.15.02(E) General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HS-I: Seek State regulations that reflect local housing issue preferences. Policy HS-1.1: Work with other local governments to change the direction of Housing Element legislative requirements and regulatory impositions. Implementation Measure HS-I.I(a): The City Council shall work through the California League of Cities, with Mendocino County, and the Mendocino Council of Governments to seek legislative relief through changes in the Housing Element regulations to change the focus from generating data to meet State formulas to actual housing programs and construction assistance designed to meet real local needs. Implementation Measure HS-I.I(b): Through its memberships and affiliations, the City Council shall work to ensure that the State reimburses in actual dollars the costs of preparing and changing housing elements to meet new or revised State regulations as opposed to meeting local housing needs. 1.15.03 Housing priorities Housing priorities have been identified within the General Plan. In order to conform with the format and organization of the General Plan, the priorities are actually components of other major issues. Each of the housing priorities is appropriately addressed in the Housing Element in one or more of the sections that comprise the element. 1.16 Conservation of affordable housing 1.16.01 Summary of major findings The City is not expected to lose any assisted housing units from the affordable housing inventory during the five-year planning period that governs the Housing Element. However, the Council of Governments has estimated that in a seven year period from 1990 through 1997, as many as one hundred residential units may be removed from the housing stock through demolition, conversion to non- residential use, or other changes in use. Most of the new housing constructed within the City during the past five years has been placed on the market as "affordable" housing. Although market-price subdivisions have been approved during the same period, the state of the economy between 1990 and 1994 has kept new housing starts in the City at lower than normal levels. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomla VI.1. Housing ~, Page 46 G 1.16.02 oal HS-2: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Maintain a balance between the loss of affordable housing and new affordable housing. Policy HS-2.1: Encourage construction of new affordable housing when there are losses of affordable housing due to demolition or other conversion. Implementation Measure HS-2.1(a): During the annual report to the Planning Commission of General Plan achievement, the Planning Department shall identify the number of affordable housing units lost during the year. The Commission shall then consider recommending that the City implement programs to encourage a like number of replacement units to be added into the affordable housing inventory. Programs may include and are not limited to: (a) Redevelopment funds from the twenty percent that must be set aside for housing may be set into a pool that can be used as an incentive for housing stock replacement or rehabilitation; or (b) (c) The City may utilize the State-pass through grants from the HOME program to "buy down" the cost of housing ownership combined with a program to recapture the grants to reinvest in the "buy down" pool; or Seek or create special grants or development incentives to assist with housing affordability programs for renters and first-time owners. (d) (e) Utilize private financial institutions' Community Reinvestment Fund commitments to direct resources into housing affordability programs; or Other programs that may become available over the life of the Housing Element's 5-Year review cycle. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects ~t, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Programs shall be prepared and adopted within the short-term planning period with a target of completion in Fiscal 199727,2s] 1.17 Rehabilitation and maintenance of existing housing 1.17.01 Summary of major findings One way to address housing needs is to ensure that existing housing does not deteriorate. When neighborhoods are well-maintained and homes are in good repair, the quality of life remains higher than areas where housing stock deteriorates. People tend to strive within personal economic means to maintain a level of appearance for their home that is similar to the "best maintained" 2*Housing Elements are certified in five year cycles, which is the entire short-term planning period. For purposes of Element implementation, special timing targets are identified to avoid time-specific actions all being deferred to the last year of the certification cycle. 28"Fiscal 1997" or "Fiscal Year 1997" refers to the City's fiscal management year which runs from July 1 through June 30. "Fiscal 1997" covers July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah Jill, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing 4, Page 47 homes in the neighborhood. This underlying tradition in American life is one of the factors that resulted in the old concept of "keeping up with the Joneses.' A well-maintained neighborhood maintains and enhances property values, encourages a higher quality of life, and results in a common interest to preserve the character and attributes that make the block a comfortable place for living. The 1985 survey of housing conditions found that 812 of the City's 5,643 housing units (14%) were in need of minor repairs and upkeep. A total of 352 (6%) were in need of major repairs. Through the Redevelopmem Agency and other block grant programs, funds can be made available to assist improving or rehabilitating the properties. An informal survey in 1994 found that conditions in terms of the number of units are generally the same as the 1985 survey. Some individual units and neighborhoods have been upgraded as older homes were purchased by families seeking "first home" ownership. Other remer-occupied neighborhoods have deteriorated. The number of homes seriously needing repair is not significant, perhaps less than five percent of the housing stock for major repairs. 1.17.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs G oal HS-3: Repair existing substandard housing to maintain an affordable housing stock. Policy HS-3.1: Idemify means of improving deteriorating housing stock. Implementation Measure HS-3.1 (a): Direct the Low and Moderate Income Housing Advisory Committee (LMIHAC) during the short-term planning period to identify public and private sources of rehabilitation financing available for home owners that are applicable to the Ukiah Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration ~, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: During the summer, the City shall collect data related to available grant programs and other financing programs; in the Fall the LMIHAC shall be convened to review the data and provide the necessary direction for selecting the most feasible or practical program for which the City shall compete or apply for funds ] Implementation Measure HS-3.1(b): Working with area banks and community services agencies, during the short-term planning period, establish a program for housing rehabilitation and repair. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Mea- sure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration under the provisions defined in Implementation Measure 3.1.b, the City shall target to begin the rehabilitation program by the end of Fiscal 1996-97 ] Implementation Measure HS-3.1(c): The City shall develop funding resource programs in order to make funds available for home repairs from appropriate gram, emitlement programs, and private financial institutions. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Special Projects Administration 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: The programs need to be in place and ready for making funds available by July 1, 1997] Implementation Measure HS-3.1(d): During the Housing Element five year period, the City shall provide funds to result in the repair of at least eleven homes based on available of financial resources. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 48 applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration ~, Financing sources: Redevelopment funds; CDBG; or one of the HUD pass-through grants, such as HOPE or HOME] Policy HS-3.2: Identify deteriorating housing stock. Implementation Measure HS-3.2(a): As part of the periodic Housing Element review, the City shall identify the locations and neighborhoods of deteriorating housing. [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period · Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: Special Projects Administration ~, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Prior to preparing the next Housing Element update, prepare a new and comprehensive housing condition study. This should be placed in the budget for Fiscal Year 1998 or 1999] Implementation Measure HS-3.2(b): Provide a mechanism at the City Building Department to record and track reports of deteriorating or substandard housing when reported to the City. [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Special Projects Administration] Policy HS-3.3: Support and enhance area self-help programs. Implementation Measure HS-3.3(a): During the short-term planning period, the Low and Moderate Income Housing Advisory Committee shall work with community service agencies, the area Board of Realtors, area Building Association, and utilize private and public volunteers to create a program of bartering repair and remodeling services as a means of reducing the costs of affordable housing repair and rehabilitation. [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration ~, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Beginning in Fiscal Year 1996, the LMIHAC shall proactively set up meetings with area private groups to serve as a catalyst for a volunteer help program] Implementation Measure HS-3.3(b): The City shall work with public and private community organizations to assist people in becoming skilled and trained for home repair. [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period ~ Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration ~, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: During Fiscal 1997, the City will work with the school district and community college district to develop self-help programs or assist in promoting existing self-help programs offered by the educational institutions. Other options, some of which were suggested by representatives of the Board of Realtors and the Community College District, in- elude City Staff assistance to coordinate a program that uses services provided by the Board of Realtors or local builders to offer in-kind services for the needy for the self-help rehab programs] Implementation Measure HS-3.3(c): Continue to support self-help programs through the Redevelopment Agency as a means of sustaining and improving the downtown area. [Timeframe for completion: Shod-term planning period ~ Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration ~, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: This measure provides another option for the implementation and funding for Implementation Measure 3.3.c] Goal HS-4: Poffcy HS-4.1: Bring homes up to acceptable minimum standards of repair. Substantially reduce substandard homes or homes in need of major repairs. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah Jill, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI. 1. Housing 4, Page 49 Implementation Measure HS-4.1(a): During the short-term planning period provide non- General Fund revenue -- such as Redevelopment Agency 20 percent set aside funds -- each year for the repair and rehabilitation for a five year total of at least 35 homes requiring major repairs. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Beginning in Fiscal 1996, target funding homes for rehab. By Fiscal 1998, the average of the homes for which rehabilitation have been made available should be the equivalent of seven homes per year] 1. Housing mix 1.18.01 Summary of major findings Ukiah residents deserve to have affordable housing options in a decent setting, regardless of income levels. New residential development should address the needs of all income levels. This will strengthen the diversity of the housing stock. More important, economic integration of housing stock provides for a more diverse setting for residents in the City. Integrating families and households in need of affordable housing into the community overall can avoid the problems associated with segregating a single economic group into one area of the community. Economic integration provides unique opportunities for families living in affordable housing to be a part of the overall community. 1.18.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HS-5: Support a mix of housing styles and price ranges in Ukiah. Policy HS-5.1: Establish programs to incorporate affordable housing into new residential development. Implementation Measure HS-5.1 (a): Remove constraints to the housing type mix in new residential development through the Planned Development zoning district or equivalent -- such as potential duplex or triplex units within single family neighborhoods -- when street capacity and public services are adequate to serve the additional units. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure ap- plies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Implemented in the new Land Development Code] Policy HS-5.2: Define the sources of financing for affordable housing. Implementation Measure HS-5.2(a): During the short-term planning period, the Low Income Housing Advisory Committee shall meet with local financial institutions and the California Department of Housing and Community Development to define which financing resources can be made available to the City. The LMIHAC shall follow up the development of the resource program with an action Plan to aggressively seek the funds. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Special Projects Administration 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Further implementation of Implementation Measure 3.1.b] Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing 4, Page 50 1.19 Home ownership opportunities 1.19.01 Summary of major findings promoting ownership one way to meet housing needs and maintain a diversified housing home is stock in the community. The City can assist by taking active steps to help increase the number of people in Ukiah who own their own homes. Providing opportunities for people to achieve a stake in the community is one of the goals of home ownership. Neighborhoods in which there is a substantial number of owner occupied dwellings are more stable, generally in better repair, and offer a higher quality of life than areas in which there is absentee ownership. A variety of housing opportunities is the best method of providing more ownership chances for new and established residents. One factor related to encouraging economic development is to ensure that there is a broad range of housing types and costs. Many communities have discovered that a lack of "executive" housing stock places the area at a competitive disadvantage when trying to attract a facility relocation. Some local employers have complained that it can be difficult to recruit new employees because area housing is not available within the income range of the new household. 1.19.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HS-6: Ensure that home ownership is both obtainable and sustainable. Policy HS-6.1: Take active steps to help increase the number of people in the area who are able own their own home. Implementation Measure HS-6. I(a): Work with the Mendocino Board of Realtors and community services agencies to offer a biennial program explaining how to become a homeowner. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departrnentresponsible: Special Projects Administration 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Target for Fiscal 1997 and Fiscal 1999] Implementation Measure HS-6.1 (b): When approached by tenant organizations, the City shall provide technical assistance and guidance to tenants in apartments, motels, and mobile home parks who desire to purchase their facilities for conversion to ownership or cooperative ownership opportunities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration]29 Implementation Measure HS-6.1 (c): Using community services organization, during the short- term planning period, the City shall develop programs to provide information, referrals, and non-financial assistance to families in danger of losing their homes. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: Special Projects Administration] 29"Ongoing" implementation measures are carried out all the time and generally will not require "special Housing Element timing provisions to be identified. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Ukiah J~' Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.I. Housing ~, Page 51 1.20 Construction of affordable housing 1.20.01 Summary of major findings Based on projected housing needs -- including regional share needs of 112 units per year through 1997 -- Ukiah needs to plan for the construction of new housing units. The projected needs of all income levels must be considered. The major issue to be satisfied is to ensure that there is a diverse set of housing types and within broad price ranges so that all components of the housing market can fred housing ownership oppommities. Affordable housing is not only housing focused on households with low and moderate incomes. Affordable housing also can be an issue with families at and above the median income if there is little or no housing available in their affordability range that meets expectations of the household. The concept of affordable presents a different scale of challenge. For example, a family with a combined income of $44,000 per year (within the "moderate" range) expected to be able to afford a monthly shelter payment of $1,100 per month.3° Depending on the downpayment and interest rate, this converts to a house within the $110,000 to $123,000 range. If there are no homes available for purchase within the price range -- due to market conditions or lack of new housing -- this sample family would be unable to find affordable housing meeting its standards. Density bonus programs are one measure for obtaining affordable housing in conventional residential projects. State law establishes standards for density bonus provisions. A density bonus, as permitted in the City's zoning ordinance, provides for an increase in site density of up to twenty-five percent if the additional units are priced for targeted housing markets. For example, if homes are to typically to be priced at $150,000 per unit in a proposed 10 unit subdivision, the City may permit two additional units (a total of 12) if these additional units are priced to be afforded by families earning less than 80% of the median income or as defined in California Government Code {}65917. The builder might use any of the affordable housing programs to bring down the price of the units based on some of the infrastructure savings. If the building saved $12,000 on infrastructure by spreading the cost over more units, these bonus units might price as $138,000. 3°This is based on a monthly income of $3,667 with 30 % allocated for shelter cost. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Californi=, VI.1. Housing ~, Page 52 What this would mean is that if the price of the units in the subdivision were to rise to $160,000 through appreciation, if the selected family resold the house, the City would recapture the $30,000 to $42,000 extended through grants and discounts, and the family would retain the earned equity in the house -- the same as a family purchasing the unit at the conventional price -- $1o,ooo. Second units attached to existing single family residences in single family residential areas are one method of promoting affordable housing. The efficiency or studio style apartment is built into an existing home. The second unit is conditionally permitted by regulation in Ukiah. The conditional use permit process ensures that neighbors have an opportunity to express a position about the increase in neighborhood density that second units generate. Second units detached or units larger than studios promote infill and may be utilized to increase housing stock within the City, where lot size and infrastructure requirements can be met. The City of Ukiah's General Plan and Growth Management Program does not include any policies that enable the "rationing" or restriction on the issuance of building permits. Permit rationing or other growth control measures have been used by some communities when faced with a severe and unanticipated situation in which it is no longer feasible to allow an unrestricted issuances of building permits. In the late 1970s and through much of the 1980s, for example, the City of Petaluma had a growth management program to ration limited residential land areas. The Lake Tahoe basin limits the number of permits issued each year for environmental reasons. The Ukiah Plan has no proposed policies along this line. The Plan, however, does establish an affordable housing protection program. Goal 9 and its associated policy and implementation measures provide that should some type of permit rationing occur, permits shall be made available to ensure adequate housing for all income levels. The City of Ukiah has an active Redevelopment Area that encompasses a significant portion of the City's central land area. A minimum of twenty percent of Redevelopment funds must be allocated to affordable housing. In addition, the Redevelopment Agency can recommend changes in the land use mix to increase housing opportunities. The Redevelopment Authority has an adopted allocation program that utilizes its funds in a manner that allows non-profit groups to leverage City funds with other funding sources to open more housing opportunities. 1.20.02 Goal HS-7: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Encourage construction of housing units to meet projected housing needs for all income groups. Policy -7.1: Ensure adequate land area for a diverse housing stock. Adopted by the City Council: November. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing 4, Page 53 Implementation Measure HS-7.1 (a): The Land Use Element shall reflect land areas in the City with appropriate locations and densities to meet the City's five year housing need. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure HS-ZI(b): Maintain an updated inventory of buildable housing sites existing within the City limits. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Create a permit tracking system that includes purchase price or rental cost information by Fiscal 1997] Policy HS-7. 2: Create incentives for developers of affordable housing. Implementation Measure HS-7.2(a): The City shall ensure that the Land Development Code is prepared with standards for density bonuses and other affordable housing incentives. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Planning Department 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Latter half of 1996] Goal HS-8: Allow construction or permitting of second residential units. Policy HS-8.1: Maintain the City's established policy program for permitting second units. Implementation Measure HS-8.1(a): Second units within single family zoning may be conditionally permitted if the site is appropriate following a public hearing and consideration of issuance of a use permit. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Goal HS-9: Ensure an adequate low and moderate income housing stock to meet City needs. Poffcy HS-9.1: Dedicate an allocation of building permits each year to be used for housing affordable to low and moderate income families. Implementation Measure HS-9.1 (a): Although the General Plan does not propose or impose any growth management program that creates permit rationing system, should such a growth control program be established, in order to meet the City's fair share of housing, the growth management program shall be designed to make available building permits for a diverse housing stock that meets the following minimum per year allocations of dwelling units: Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 54 Income category ........................ Number of units3~ Very Iow income .................................... 44 Low income ....................................... 22 Moderate income ................................... 28 Above moderate income ............................. 62 These numbers are only put into place if the City institutes a program for growth management that rations the number of permits issued each year. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentrespon- sible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure HS-9.1(b): The City shall work with local housing agencies to encourage the construction of at least three low- or low-moderate housing units per year for owner-occupancy. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,1, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration] Poffcy HS-9. 2: Facilitate the construction of affordable housing. Implementation Measure HS-9.2(a): During the short-term planning period, modify internal application processing systems to fast-track projects providing affordable housing. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department ~I, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: This is a provision to be included in the new Land Development Code] Implementation Measure HS-9.2(b): Include in the Land Development Code a series of standard conditions that would apply to affordable housing in order to allow pre- planning for project conditions. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ,~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department ,1, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: The City's existing zoning ordinance includes a "Planned Development" ordinance that will be carried forward in concept to the revised Land Development Code. The PD ordinance relaxes standards for setbacks, parking, and other development in order to provide the highest levels of flexibility. The Ukiah PD ordinance, a copy which has been filed with the Department Housing and Community Development, allow nearly "negotiated" building and site development standards in exchange for benefits to the community. Standard conditions typically include establishing the number of parking spaces per unit, type and design of landscaping and open space areas, building setbacks, and other special provisions related to the site development. Building design and neighborhood compatible design is likely to be a part of future project reviews following adoption of the new land development code during the certification cycle of the Housing Element] Implementation Measure HS-9.2(c): Continue to utilize the Density Bonus provisions of the Land Development Code to provide opportunities for affordable housing projects by distributing infrastructure costs across more units which reduces the cost per unit 3~Minimum number dwelling units for which building permits are to be made available during the short-term planning period (5 years). A multi-family dwelling has multiple units with only one building permit. Adopted by the City Council: November. 1995 City of Ukiah tl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing 4, Page 55 of infrastructure development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure HS-9.2(d): Utilize the Planned Development zoning district or its equivalent to allow development design flexibility for affordable housing projects. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Planning Department] Goal HS-10: Continue to utilize redevelopment funds for affordable housing. Policy HS-IO. 1: Appropriately utilize the twenty percent redevelopment housing fund allocation to create or leverage affordable housing. Implementation Measure HS-IO.I (a): Coordinate efforts between the Redevelopment Agency and the Low and Moderate Income Advisory Committee to determine and meet affordable housing needs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Mea- sure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure HS-IO. 1 (b): Utilize Redevelopment funds, when feasible, as leverage with private and other funding sources to generate more housing. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: This measure provides further coordination with the requirements in Implementation Measure 3.1.b] Implementation Measure HS-IO.I(c): The Redevelopment Agency housing mix incentives shall include provisions for mixed uses and combinations of residential and commercial development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Mea- sure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration] 1.21 Meeting special housing needs 1.21.01 Summary of major findings Some of the groups in the Ukiah area which have special housing needs include the elderly, disabled, homeless, seasonal workers, and single mothers with children. Although there is a definitive need for support services for special populations, the City's current construction programs have resulted in the addition of new housing stock to meet special population needs. 1.21.02 Goal HS-11: General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs People with special needs shall have access to housing and supportive housing services. G Policy HS-11.1: Maintain a current inventory of housing for persons with special needs. Implementation Measure HS-11.1 (a): Inventory the existing housing that is available. [Time- frame for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: Special Projects Administration 4, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Prepare the special inventory of housing by Fiscal 1997] oal HS-12: Ensure that migratory/seasonal workers have affordable housing options. Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ,e Page 56 Policy HS-12.1: Encourage the provision of appropriate, safe, affordable housing for seasonal labor and families. Implementation Measure HS-12. I(a): Work with the County to continue a program for providing housing for migratory and seasonal works. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Special Projects Administration] Implementation Measure HS-I2. I (b): During the short-term planning period, work with the County to establish a program to assist appropriate agencies or organizations with the acquisition of older motels or other facilities that could be converted to seasonal worker housing. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure ap- plies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration ~, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Begin an inventory in Fiscal 1997, start assistance with acquisition in Fiscal 1998. This program is likely to be targeted to carry over into the intermediate-term planning period because of its undetermined capital costs. A likely source for the funds would be the Redevelopment Agency's 20% set aside funds.] Goal HS-I3: Continue to permit development of group care homes. Policy HS-13.1: Support efforts to integrate group care homes to meet special housing needs. Implementation Measure HS-13.1 (a): Provide staff support or other assistance to organizations seeking to develop group care homes for the elderly, developmentally disabled, or the physically disabled. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ,1, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Special Projects Administration] Implementation Measure HS-13.1(b): Offer permit processing incentives or other assistance for group homes that are proposed to be developed through rehabilitation of existing housing stock or that are designed to enhance or improve neighborhood character or appearances. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ~, Measure ap- plies to: City ,e, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Special Projects Administration] 1.22 Jobs-housing balance 1.22.01 Summary of major findings Balancing employment opportunities with housing availability is an issue that transcends all income groups. One of the critical components of the General Plan is the desire to attract creative, clean, and good-paying industry to the area. While "start-ups" -- a completely new business that starts from scratch in the area -- may make almost exclusive use of the existing labor pool, a business expanding to the area or relocating to the Ukiah Valley would most likely bring key employees with it as part of the relocation. Because of this approach, a relocating business examines not only the available pool of labor, the costs of doing business locally, and the expense of the relocation, the business also looks to ensure that there is quality housing affordable to its relocating staff. Maintaining a balance between available jobs and locations for housing is the issue. In order to maintain this balance, a community must ensure that when it is making land available for employment development opportunities that it also has appropriate land suitable for new housing to accommodate the change in the labor force. The siting of lands for residential purposes is within the Land Use Element in Chapter III. 1 beginning on page VI-1. Encouragement for new job generation is in the Vision Statement and the Economic Development Element in Chapter VI.C beginning on page VI-65. The Adopted by the City Council: November. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 57 focus on the Housing Element is to guide siting and recruitment policies as a means of directing that housing locations be near employment centers. 1.22.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HS-14: Achieve an employment-housing balance. Policy HS-14.1:Ensure that lands for housing are located near designated areas that will serve as employment centers. Implementation Measure HS-I4.1(a): Identify and coordinate housing development with existing and future job(s) so that lands near job centers are designated for appropriate residential development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department ,~ Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: The Land Use Element reflects this in siting new residential areas] Implementation Measure HS-14.1 (b): In reviewing residential development proposals near job centers, the City shall incorporate into staff reports an inventory of the proposed new housing and its purchase price along with an inventory of the number of jobs available in the area by income bracket. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure HS-14.1 (c): Establish land development regulations that encourage subdivisions to offer a diversity of housing stock to match the family affordability index for the Valley. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] 1.23 Non-traditional housing styles 1.23.01 Summary of major findings One way to help alleviate the burden of providing more housing to a given population is to use the existing housing in a more effective way. One way of doing this is to have shared housing. Shared housing often occurs on its own when people have lost all other options and move in with family and/or friends as a way to avoid homelessness. Planned shared housing allows residents to become involved out of choice rather than necessity. Impediments to higher density living that discourage shared housing need to be removed in order to simplify the process. The city needs to develop programs to encourage shared housing, taking the lead from other cities where such programs have been successfully implemented. Some services these programs can provide are counseling for people in shared housing situations, assistance with contract writing for people entering shared housing arrangements, and assistance for matching up parties interested in shared housing arrangements. There are several specific populations that can benefit from shared housing arrangements: elderly people not wanting to live alone or in senior housing, single parents that would like to live with other adults to ease the responsibilities of child raising, any person who would like to live in a house rather than an apartment but could not handle the expense of a house alone or would merely prefer to live with others. Adopted by the City Council: November. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.1. Housing ~, Page 58 The increased possibility of home ownership is certainly a plus. Also, the needs of a differently abled person may be aided by living in a shared housing arrangement. 1.23.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HS-15: Encourage non-traditional housing and ownership styles. Policy HS-15.1: Encourage new flexible housing stock design which may accommodate uses other than traditional single family residence. Implementation Measure HS-15.1 (a): Amend the land development regulations to simplify the approval of planned unit development, shared-facility housing, and non-traditional single family residential housing. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period ,l, Measure applies to: C~y ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department ~, Special timing provisions related to the Housing Element: Identify "co-housing" as a land use and provide for cooperative housing within the subdivision ordinance. Allow for shared housing and shared facilities in the building code. Latter half of 1996] Policy HS-15.2: The City shall encourage alternative living arrangements which maximize the use of the available housing stock and land resources. Implementation Measure HS-15.2(a): The City shall work with community agencies to facilitate shared housing arrangements. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] 1.24 Housing Element review 1.24.01 Summary of major findings California law requires that the Housing Element be updated every five years. In addition, State law also requires an annual review of achievement of the General Plan. The General Plan includes provisions to require that all Elements of the Plan be reviewed each year to measure the success of implementation. The Housing Element is to be part of this review. In addition, the proposed land development code is to be reviewed at the same time. 1.24.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs G oal HS-16: Maintain the viability of the City's housing programs. Policy HS-16.1: Review the Housing Element on an periodic basis. Implementation Measure HS-16.1(a): The Low Income Housing Advisory Committee shall prepare a report with the City's Annual General Plan review to identify the progress in achieving the Housing Element to be a part of the Community Development Department's annual report on the General Plan. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Departmentresponsible: Special Projects Administration] Implementation Measure HS-16.1(b): The Low Income Housing Advisory Committee shall identify in its report fiscally achievable recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council concerning those areas in which the City may not be meeting its goals. Adopted by the City Council: November. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.1. Housing ~, Page 59 [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agen- cy/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration] 1.25 Fair housing and anti-discrimination 1.25.01 Summary of major findings The supported housing opportunities. City makes available booklets City of Ukiah has long fair The providing information about resources to assist those believing that they have been the subject of discrimination related to housing opportunities. Complaints fielded by the City are turned over to the District Attorney for investigation and prosecution, if needed. This has been the system used by the City for the past ten years, and appears to have been successful in resolving the limited number of complaints received. 1.25.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal HS-17: Support fair housing regulations. Policy HS-1ZI: Provide information on enforcement and assistance for housing discrimination complaints. Implementation Measure HS-1 Z 1 (a): Continue to make available information on resources to assist persons believing that they have been denied fair housing opportunities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Special Projects Administration] Adopted by the City Council: November, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County 2 COMMUNITY DESIGN Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. COmmunity Design ~, Page 1 OMMUNITY DESIGN IS an optional element that is not defined in California regulations. It is one of the more popular elective General Plan elements; more than 120 of California's 265 incorporated cities have design elements. Nearly half the State's counties and over half of its cities have Design Review boards. The Community Design Elemem is intended to establish policy parameters for accommodating all views of the area's appearance. The first section of this Elemem is about design guidelines and administration of guidelines. This is followed by a discussion of the componems of design throughout the Valley. Within each section, there is an explanation box idemifying to which land uses the section applies. 2.01 Design guidelines and standards 2.01.01 Summary of major findings During the community visioning process for this element, the need to ensure that buildings are "attractive" and "~esthetically pleasing" was stressed. Additionally, attractive landscaping of new commercial and industrial development was considered important. Recemly, the city has been making efforts to improve its appearance through  :::::::::::::::::::::: Design guidelines provide an oppommity for[ creating districts which provide a "sense of place." For example, Downtown benefits from a relatively high density of architectural and historically signif- icant structures which could be complemented and I ii!ii~~iiiii!i~illliiilliililli~iiiiliiilili!liiii!iii~i!!I!iiiIi~~iill'"! further enhanced by new development. In this area, it is especially critical to ensure that new buildings adjoin directly onto sidewalks rather than be sited behind parking lots to ensure an attractive !i!ilii/iiiiiii~iiiiii:.. "j:i.' ........ ~ .... .~"i'li~i~!iiiii~iiiiliii~iiiiliiiiiii!il'"'i'"'l ........... ~'"~":'l:':'~::I:::i:::l:::: ......... ~:~:: and inviting environment for pedestrian shoppers. need guidelines to ensure that buildings are createarticulated attractivein terms Ofenvironment.Scale and design so that theyl.~.:.:::::::::::.~::~:~:~:~55G .... City as a part of the 1992 Downtown Master Plan. Design guidelines need to be consistem between the City and the County to ensure that, through the application of a uniform set of criteria residents of the Valley as a whole know what to expect in terms of design standards. By providing those wanting to build new structures with similar criteria, "design shopping" for the "cheaper" requirements can be avoided. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. Community Design 4, ?age 2 City of Uklah ~ M®ndocino County, California The visual character of commercial and industrial developments within the City of Ukiah and outlying communities could be improved by developing and enforcing sign and landscaping standards. Such standards are especially important along the Highway 101 and the railroad corridors. Newer residential neighborhoods also present design opportunities during subdivision review. Increasingly narrow lots and ever larger garages are turning many newer neighborhoods into monotonous streetscapes dominated by garage doors and driveways in place of inviting porches and facades which characterize older neighborhoods. Alleyways for accessing garages, roomy front porches, or other tradi- tional small town design characteristics could be encouraged through design standards to ensure that new neighborhoods mimic the positive visual qualities of the City's older neighborhoods. County staff will function as the primary reviewing body for design review once the Guidelines are adopted. Both the City and County staffs have the ability to draw upon technical advisors when needed, much as the City Planning Commission has provided design and technical advice for the Redevelopment design review process. 2.01.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs GoalCD-l: Establish a design review program appropriate for the Ukiah Valley. Policy CD-I.I: Encourage appropriate scale, materials, setbacks, and landscaping to enhance the Valley's beauty and historic fabric. Implementation Measure CD-I.1 (a): Ensure that the design standards in the Land Devel- opment Code include standards for material compatibility with the visual fabric of the area in terms of material, siting, scale, and landscaping. [Timeframe for comple- tion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CD-1. l(b): Develop a resource list showing where design amenities can be acquired by property developers. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-I. 2: Ensure consistent design guidelines throughout the Ukiah Valley. Implementation Measure CD-1.2(a): To streamline and provide consistency to the design review process, create a combined City-County Ukiah Valley Design Review Committee to prepare the Uk/ah Valley Design Guidelines. [Timeframe for completion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CD-1.2(b): The City shall administer the Design Review Guidelines through a Design Review Committee that passes advisory recommendations during the Site Development Review process. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Goal CD-2: Policy CD-2.1: Seek out future designs to become "preservable" structures. Encourage developers to construct new buildings and settings of such quality that Ukiah's future citizens will wish to protect them. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. Community Design ~, Page 3 Implementation Measure CD-2.1 (a): Utilize design standards in the Land Development Code which help to create quality designs which future residents will want to preserve. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: City and County · , Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-2.2: Ensure that developments relate harmoniously with each other within districts. Implementation Measure CD-2.2(a): Include design standards that reflect the land use intensity and the different design needs for separate areas within the Valley. [Timeframe completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/De- partment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal CD-3: Policy CD-3.1: Provide an ~.sthetically pleasing urbanscape. Establish Design Review guidelines tailored to neighborhood character and land uses. G Implementation Measure CD-3.1 (a): The design review guidelines in the Land Development Code shall be reflective of neighborhood character and land use intensity. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] oal CD-4: Seek uniform, attractive landscaping standards for non-single family residential development throughout the Valley. Policy CD-4.1: Establish and enforce landscaping standards in all non-single family residential, multi-family, commercial, and industrial development and all redevelopment pro- jects. Implementation Measure CD-4.1 (a): Create a combined City-County landscape program to ensure uniform standards and requirements for new non-single family residential, multi-family, commercial, industrial development, and all redevelopment projects. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-4.2: Encourage planting of native trees and plants. Implementation Measure CD-4.2(a): Utilize design standards that encourage the planting of native, adaptive, and drought resistant vegetation in all introduced and approved landscaping plans. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~ Measure ap- plies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-4. 3: Require landscaping that will result in the creation of new street canopies. Implementation Measure CD-4.3(a): The landscape standards in the Land Development Code shall include provisions for street canopies and streetscape enhancement. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Californi= VI.2. Community Design ~, Page 4 Implementation Measure CD-4.3(b): The City and County shall cooperate to permit planting of canopy trees within the rights-of-way to improve or enhance the streetscape. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~1, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 2.02 The Ukiah Valley setting 2.02.01 Summary of major findings Thescenic setting of the Ukiah Valley is the city of Ukiah's primary a;sthetic asset. Views of wooded or chaparral cove,red mountains provide a dramatic backdrop for all parts of the City and the Ukiah valley. The City s western neighborhoods abut directly against wooded hillsides, while views of the steep Mayacama Mountains across the valley can be seen to the east down City streets. While most of these ridges are too steep for significant development, pressure to develop the lower flanks will likely increase, with possible adverse a;sthetic impacts due design. The City has recently proposed revisions to its hillside development standards due to ~is con- the east and south. These inte~ive agricultural areas provide a strong ~d ple~t contr~t wi~ ~e developed urban areas of the U~ valley and provide much of its ~ral, aRractive character. roves tree , also proviae a major visual element ows rough unaeve)oped ood plain or agricultural areas, which has helped to preserve some of its natural qualities. Creeks flowing from the western hills flow through parts of the city and contain vestiges of native vegetation. However, because of urban development, some of the natural scenic quality of these creeks has been diminished. Public vantage points in terms of views of the river and area creeks are also somewhat limited. Throughout Ukiah and in scattered areas throughout the valley are surviving groves of valley oak forests which originally carpeted much of the valley's floor. Because of their large size, these remaining trees provide a significant silhouette and add immeasurably to the visual character of the area. Many outstanding large trees of all species, which are significant visual resources and part of the heritage of the community, can be conserved or protected through creative site design. Part of the role of community design in maintaining this panorama and the attractive first impression of the Valley is to ensure that the areas in which "urban scale" development is likely to occur -- Ukiah, Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. Community Design ~, Page 5 Calpella, The Forks, and Talmage -- continue to be separate and distinct areas. These areas are considered likely to develop due to the availability of public services and community facilities. Retaining this requires green space between the communities. 2.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CD-5: Preserve and enhance the scenic setting of the Ukiah valley. Policy CD-5.1: Maintain areas without urban scale development that provide visual separation between the Valley's communities. Implementation Measure CD-5.1(a): Consider the visual effects of density when assigning land use density and building intensity in areas between communities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~t, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agen- cy/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-5.2: Preserve native riparian vegetation on both the Russian River and along tributary creeks in the Ukiah Valley. Implementation Measure CD-5.2(a): Implement provisions of the Open Space Element related to riparian habitat in the Design Review Guidelines. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ,e, Measure applies to: City and County ~ Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-5.3: Encourage an attractive US 101 viewshed. Implementation Measure CD-5.3(a): Ensure that design standards in the Land Development Code incorporate provisions to be responsive to enhancing or complementing views from US 101 through the use of landscaping or other site design characteristics. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal CD-6: Policy CD-6.1: Ensure community separation and identification. Enhance, protect and preserve viewscapes and visually important community separators. Implementation Measure CD-6.1(a): Provide guidelines and design recommendations for property owners which assist in their pre-planning for development when their properties are located in vi~ually ~cr~itlvc highly viS~le areas. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Ongoing planning period ,, Measure applies to: City and County ,e Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 2.03 The "Gateways" 2.03.01 Summary of major findings A"gateway" is a term used to describe the "first impression" that a resident or visitor has of the Ukiah Valley. For the General Plan, there are two levels of gateways. The first level is the gateways into the Valley -- US 101, Highways 20 and 253, and Eastside Road. In general, most Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi'~ VI.2. Community Design 4, Page 6 participants in the visioning process fred that the entry points to the Valley present an attractive panorama of orchards, vineyards, and trees. The natural appearance of the Valley is well-recognized as attractive and beautiful. These beautiful gateway views of the Valley can become cluttered with large scale buildings of "utilitarian" design and a proliferation of signs and billboards. Thus the beauty which could otherwise be both an attraction to visitors and source of pride for residents would be lost. The second gateway level is the entrance into the City itself. There are six main gateways to the City and its environs: North State Street, South State Street, Perkins Street, Gobbi Street, Talmage Road, and Low Gap Road. The City gateways are less of a panorama, in that one sees a more narrow scope of view -- the streetscape and immediately-visible buildings or lots. Much of the discussion about "how Ukiah looks" when one enters the City is based on the impressions of the area's heaviest concentration of commercial development with the Crossroads Shopping Center (which is in the unincorporated County) at the north, Orchard Plaza at Perkins, and the new WalMart at Talmage. Although Gobbi still retains some large mature treecover, the area close to the railroad opens to "satellite" or "strip-style" commercial development. The corridor of commercial development along State Street is a strong, visually dominant element in both Ukiah and other parts of the Ukiah valley. For visitors and residents alike, generally both the initial and most frequent impressions of Ukiah are made while traveling along this thoroughfare. To a lesser extent this is also true of Perkins Street, Gobbi Street, and Talmage Road. Outside the City's immediate downtown area, much of State Street is dominated by a typical strip development type of streetscape. While street trees have been installed along some property frontages, the trees species used for the most part lack the ultimate growth size needed to provide a more significant visual presence in softening or unifying the streetscape. 2.03.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CD-7: Improve the appearance of area gateways. Policy CD-Z l: T~',,,r¢ ad-,'antag¢ c,f ~tablish public policy oppom~,fes to enhance and improve the appearance of area gateways. Implementation Measure CD-7. I (a): Utilize redevelopment powers and other property im- provement incentives to encourage property owners to rebuild, restore, or generally enhance the appearance of gateway areas. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJlr, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. community Design 4, Page 7 Implementation Measure CD-7.1 (b): Utilize volunteer efforts and make available public rights- of-way for planting trees and flowers to improve the gateway streetscape. [Time- frame for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 2.04 Agricultural and scenic area character 2.04.01 Summary of major findings The rural character of the area is a major of its heritage, part are the,a_chieve,,m_ents agriculture, horticulture, and historical and archaeological sites. Because of the nature of plant growth and decline, this issue is often overlooked. Thus it becomes necessary to identify these sites and contributions, seek to preserve the locale, conserve the character, propagate the genetic material, or record the heritage of this part of our history. 2.04.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs G oal CD-8: Recognize that general area appearance -- especially of the orchards and vistas -- is a cultural and visual re- source. Policy CD-8.1: Encourage the preservation of scenic views, vistas, and streetscapes. Implementation Measure CD-8.1(a): Develop City and County design guidelines to assist new development in the rural areas of the Valley to include design and siting features that are intended to preserve the vistas and agrarian appear- ance of the area. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 2,05 A sense of place A"sense of place" is a term that refers to a subjective positive feeling that one is able to experience in a location. While there is no "hard and fast" def'mition as to what constitutes a "sense of place,' effectively it is how a community or area is described, its comfort level, and the positive feelings to return to the area. A sense of place is an important part of the success of a community. If there is no belief or feeling of belonging to a community, the area does not become one's home or place to which there is a desire to return. While much of the General Plan deals with facts and figures proposing policy programs with goals that can be measured in numbers, the Community Design element addresses the subjective issues of a;sthetics. The attractiveness of the Valley -- from its panoramas to individual build- Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Californi,~ VI.2. Community Design ~, Page 8 ings -- is going to be measured be different standards from one person to the next. The purpose of defining a sense of place is to try and provide the parameters within which design standards will ultimately be developed. 2.05.01 Downtown 2.05.01(A) Summary of major findings The most attractive features of the urban environment of Ukiah include the historic buildings, which are mostly found in the downtown area and the tree-lined streets in older neighborhoods. Downtown Ukiah also includes streets dominated by small scale commercial buildings with a pedestrian orientation. Downtown Ukiah has been undergoing the initial stages of a renaissance in its appearance, partially inspired by redevelopment efforts, partially generated by the need to enhance the appearance of buildings for market value, and partially due to the change in the downtown business market. In 1992, the City adopted a Downtown Master Plan with con- cepts for design, plazas, and improved area appear- ance. Maintaining appropriate design standards com- patible with the mix of the existing buildings' design and ages is a formidable task. Final definition is left to the Land Development Code. However, the concepts of the design guidelines are addressed below. 2.05.01(B) General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CD-9: Improve and enhance the appearance of Downtown Ukiah. Policy CD-9.1: Utilize redevelopment powers to improve the appearance of Downtown Ukiah. Implementation Measure CD-9.1(a): TA',,<C advantage of use the Redevelopment Plan and the ability to acquire funds for the Downtown area in order to improve the appearance of the area. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~I, Measure applies to: City ~ Agency/Departmentresponsible: City Council] Implementation Measure CD-9.1(b): Provide incentives and other support to downtown property owners to improve and restore the appearance of buildings. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ,e, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. COmmunity DeSign · Page 9 Implementation Measure CD-9.1(c): Ensure that new and rebuilt downtown properties maintain the character and sense of place for the downtown area. [Timeframe forcom- pletion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Departmentre- sponsible: Planning Department] Policy CD-9. 2: Ensure compatibility of new development in the downtown area. Implementation Measure CD-9.2(a): Require that new building designs be complementary to the overall character of the neighborhood in which a project is located. ['Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Policy CD-9.3: Ensure Downtown design that will enhance the character of the area. Implementation Measure CD-9.3(a): Require signage, lighting, awning, and outdoor furniture in the Downtown to be of a design which will reflect and enhance the character of the area. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period · Measure applies to: City · Agency/Departmentresponsible: Planning Department] 2.05.02 Residential neighborhoods 2.05.02(A) Summary of major findings The City of Ukiah is built around various residential neighborhoods which reflect its growth and annexations since incorporation. Many of these residential neighborhoods contain homes or business buildings of similar age or character. As buildings age, the care and upkeep may differ from structure to structure. When this occurs, some residential neighborhoods may have homes that are in "pristine" condition while others provide opportunities for rehabilitation or restoration, or may even warrant demolition. When older buildings are demolished and replaced by newer buildings, it is important to ensure that the fabric of the neighborhood is not visually overwhelmed by newer construction. Maintaining a neighborhood's residential character is important for its long-term stability. If the comfort or appearance of a neighborhood changes significantly, the existing residents may feel a loss and may wish to move from the area. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County, California VI.2. Community Design 4, Page 10 ../ Figure VI.2-JJ: Redevelopment Area Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Progran, VI.2. Community Design ~, Page I II YOKA YO SCHOOL IIIll I IIII IIIII IIIII I IIII IIIII IIIII IIIII I tlt I 11111 IIIII I Itll IIIII I IIII I IIII IIIII IIIII IIII I IIIII II111 Illll II111 lllll IIIII ~,,, ~ Figure VI. 2-KK: Downtown Master Plan Area Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah l~ Mendocino County, California VI.2. Community Design 4, Page 12 If a neighborhoods' character appears to be in transition from single family to mixed or other higher density uses, the City or County may face pressure from property owners seeking to increase the density or intensity of land uses. This may result in a reduction in owner-occupied single family homes in a neighborhood. Ensuring that a residential character is retained helps hold property values and neigh- borhood desirability at higher levels. Ukiah has residential neighborhoods con- taining many historically significant and a~sthet- ically-pleasing older buildings. A policy directed at the preservation of these neighborhoods will protect the property values of these districts and have a positive impact on the property values of surround- ing areas. Preservation of the best of the past will increase the desirability of living in Ukiah. Historic properties can also be used as a resource to encourage tourism. Years of small changes to existing structures can radically change a, neighborhood.. Changes in architectural style invade the integrity of historic design. Individual property owners who renovate their properties are often alone in deciding many of the elements of the renovation. Few resources are available to facilitate their decision-making. An advocacy or advisory board, working with neighborhood associa- tions, could help the individual owner to accomplish renovation or restoration goals while maintaining or enhancing the integrity of the historic structure. Goal CD-10: 2.0'J. O2(B) General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Preserve and enhance neighborhood character. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ M®ndocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. Community Design 4, Page 13 CITY OF UKIAH CIVIC CENTER YOKA YO SCHOOL Figure VI. 2-LL: City of Ukiah Historic Neighborhood boundaries Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah tl~ Mendocino County, Califomi; VI.2. Community Design 4, Page 14 Policy CD-lO./:Ensure that new construction in established neighborhoods maintains or enhances existing neighborhood character. Implementation Measure CD-lO. 1 (a): Utilize provisions in the Land Development Code to en- sure that there are design guidelines which assist property owners in selecting materials and styles for new construction in established residential neighborhoods. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal CD-11: Conserve the character and architecture of its neighborhoods. Policy CD-II./:Encourage neighborhood groups to be actively involved in the preservation of their neighborhoods. Implementation Measure CD-II. 1 (a): Support efforts of neighborhood groups to become interested and active in neighborhood preservation. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] GoalCD-12: Conserve the character and architecture of Ukiah and Valley neighborhoods. Policy CD-12.1:Maintain and improve Ukiah's streets, lighting, trees, landscaping, and parks in a manner that enhances the City's beauty and historic fabric. Implementation Measure CD-12.1 (a): Establish public design standards for street furniture and landscaping that enhance the streetscape and general fabric of the City. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 2.06 Signs 2.06.01 Summary of major findings The number, sizes, and appearance of signs is a concern within the valley. Sign regula- tions generate significant controversy on all sides of the issue. Somewhere in the debate over sign regulations is a fair balance that meets objectives from all concerned. Design Review regulations can be used to provide a base from which fair sign regulations and appearance standards can be created to serve the community. Sign regulations should focus on creating an environment in which signs can serve marketing needs in an attractive and informative manner. The regulations should not get bogged down in the minute details -- such as the style of letters or color of the placard. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. Community Design 4, Page 15 2.06.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal CD-13: Coordinate City and County sign regulations in the Planning Area. Policy CD-13.1:Reduce visual clutter by developing a consistent signage ordinance for the entire valley, including the freeway, which sets consistent standards. Implementation Measure CD-13.1 (a): The Land Development Code shall include sign size and siting provisions. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CD-13.1(b): Develop uniform City-County design guidelines for attractive, informative signs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CD-13. I (c): Sign regulations shall strive to incorporate a consistent program for new signs to prevent the Valley from becoming overwhelmed by signs of disparate heights, size, and design. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] 2.07 Special design issues 2.07.01 Summary of major findings 2.07.01(A) Sound walls As an area develops and traffic increases, noise from vehicles can become a source of annoyance and potentially a health hazard in older residential areas which were built adjoining major street and highway corridors. A common solution is to construct "sound walls" between the residences and the road generating the noise. Technically, sound walls must be of adequate height to block the line-of-sight between the noise-generating vehicles and the noise receivers. These monolithic walls line many urban freeways. There is significant concern that a con- ventional sound wall would detract significantly from the visual quality of the Ukiah Valley. Some communities -- while surrendering to the simplicity of the sound wall as a solution -- have imposed significant design requirements to prevent the appearance of a monolithic wall. Similar policies have been added to the Ukiah General Plan. ZOT.01(B) Under- ground utilities A basic method of improving the design and appearance of an area, is to place overhead utilities -- electrical power, telecommunications, Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. Community Design 4, ?age 16 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi.- and cable television -- underground. Undergrounding utilities takes the wires from the skyline and places OUt ight. ,..:~.,~ ....." ........ ,.,. ..... : ..... "~" .... :- "-:~ ~' ........ ' them of s u,,. ,..,,~ ......... ~ ....,.,, ........ , ............ "'~ ............. " ........ ,.,,-v,,,~,,~, ,,.,. required to '~'-"~ 2.07.01(C) Public places Public facilities and buildings sometimes leave design considerations out of the budget in order to save funds. This often results in unattractive public buildings. Because public buildings often set the tone for the areas in which they are located they should adhere to quality design standards. Therefore they should be subject to the same design guidelines as private development. Parking lots are often public areas to which little attention is directed during the project design. Changes in the City's approach to parking lot design are apparent in the approved plans for WalMart and K-Mart, both parking areas which required extensive landscaping. As parking areas are built or improved throughout the City, more conscientious design standards are to be incorporated in order to downplay "fields of asphalt." 2.07.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs GoalCD-14: Require design standards for sound walls and other noise barriers. Policy CD-14./.'Utilize sound walls as a last resort for noise mitigation. Require design review when used. Implementation Measure CD-14.1(a): Avoid sound walls for noise mitigation wherever feasible; if unavoidable, require the design be reviewed for a.~sthetics, function and sound reducing capabilities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Mea- sure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Goal CD-15: Work to place overhead utilities underground. Policy CD-15./:Place utilities underground where feasible and safe. Implementation Measure CD-15.1(a): The City shall establish a utility fund for the costs of undergrounding its City-owned power lines. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing plann- ing pedod 4, Measure applies to: City 4, Agency/Department responsible: Electric Utilities Division] Implementation Measure CD-I5.1(b): Coordinate cooperation between utility providers to share costs and responsibilities for undergrounding their services, when feasible. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Electric Utilities, telephone, electric companies] Goal CD-16: Create attractive public places and buildings. Policy CD-16./.'Work to create public places and plazas within the City. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County 'Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.2. Community Design 4, Page :17 Implementation Measure CD-16. I (a): Encourage creation of public places and plazas designed to serve City and neighborhood needs. [Timeframe tot completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CD-I6. I (b): Design public places avaa'-ptazas to be safe and attractive for passive use. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-16. 2:Ensure attractive public buildings. G Implementation Measure CD-16.2(a): New public buildings shall be subject to design review standards. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: C~ and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CD-16.2(b): Design review applied to public development shall be sympathetic to the location and use of the building as well as the standards that would be applied to similar private development. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure CD-I6.2(c): Seek cooperation of the state, school districts, and community college district in using the Design Review Guidelines for new buildings and facilities. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] oal CD-17: Require commercial and industrial parking lots to be designed and sited so as to increase the attractiveness of the areas in which they are located. Policy CD-17.1:Site commercial and industrial parking lots to be designed subservient to the structure it serves. Implementation Measure CD-17.1 (a): When feasible, locate parking facilities to the rear of main structures. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Policy CD-17. 2:Include parking lot design and landscaping standards within the land development code. Implementation Measure -17.2(a): Include within the land use development code a design requirement that parking lots include landscaping to increase attractiveness and to provide shade. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department and County Department of Planning and Building] Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program 3 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT VI.3. Economic Development 4, Page I he Economic Development Element is an optional General Plan element. Its purpose is to bring the vision of improving the area's job climate and market opportunities to a policy level with the City Council. The Economic Development Element incorporates the directives from the City's adopted Economic Development Strategy within its goals, policies, and implementation measures. 3.01 The Community Vision: Available opportunities and community direction 3.01.01 Summary of major findings In 1991, the City of Ukiah authorized a study to be prepared by Delphi Consulting to learn the attitudes and opinions of City voters related to the long-term growth and development of the area. "Bring more jobs to Ukiah" was the prevalent response to the question asking what should be done to improve the quality of life. Other questions showed a split between those supporting growth-oriented concepts and those voters desiring to limit or control growth rates in the Valley. The survey results suggest that the people of Ukiah want more or better jobs, but they want a small town. The economy of Ukiah is completely integrated with the unincorporated areas of the valley, and the goals and policies envisioned for Ukiah have application to the rest of Mendocino County and to a lesser extent much of Northern California. Many of the policies can not be effective without implementation by the county as well. Therefore, in creating an ongoing process of economic development, the creation of a close working relationship between the city and county, and ultimately the cooperation and collaboration between resource based counties, is essential. This will also be important in soliciting needed outside funding resources and in creating regional cooperatives that reflect the regional nature of our resource base. Furthermore, cost savings can be achieved by coordinated efforts with the county and region. Quality of life is a vital factor in attracting new businesses and sustaining existing local businesses. In addition, research indicates that companies throughout the country and specifically within California, are choosing to relocate to smaller rural communities that emphasize quality of life as reflected by lower crime rates, improved education, rural environment, decrease in traffic and community involvement by the residents. For many years, the timber industry had been the largest employer. Recently its role has been reduced as fewer and fewer jobs are available. Government employment has remained steady and private sector jobs have declined slightly. Increased fruit and vineyard/winery operations have resulted in a small increase in agricultural jobs. The greatest increase in employment came from the retail and service sector. In developing a specific marketing strategy to attract new business from outside the area it is important to focus the limited available resources. To provide such focus a proactive marketing approach should be directed towards companies that build upon the existing businesses and services in Ukiah and that are consistent with a resource based economy and the community values, as defined in the Vision Statement. For these same reasons retirees are attracted to quality communities. The largest segment of income in the valley is from retirement income -- more than manufacturing or agriculture. Retirees bring wealth both in pension money and savings. They support service and retail jobs and provide the most stable Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.& Economic Development ~, Page 2 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California income. They are also a source of volunteer labor for many non-profit and social activities. We should continue to attract retirees who are affluent enough to add economic strength to the community. Mendocino County's quality of life and ability to serve business results from a combination of factors: generally abundant water supplies, favorable climate, and available land for industry and agriculture. Capitalizing on these resources can be a positive attraction to improving the area economy rather than trying to compete for businesses needing resources the area must import. The Vision Statement identifies an "ecologically-sustainable community" and "responsible use of resources" among the major goals for the future. To meet these goals the community must maintain a balance between the area's renewable resources and the population that can be supported by sustained use of these available resources. In 1993, Mendocino College, the City, County, private groups, and other public agencies hosted a County-wide Economic Summit. This convocation not only highlighted the need for protecting the environment and enhancing the quality of life, but specifically provided direction to moving toward a sustainable resource-based economy. In concert with the overall intentions of the community driven General Plan process, economic development needs to be focused on the key values of the community as defined in the Vision Statement. From this perspective the enhancement of a "small town" identity becomes a central strategic element of this Plan. The Summit also focussed on the need for higher income producing employment as well. Mendocino County and the City of Ukiah both lag behind the State in per capita income. Of greatest concern is that with the decline of traditional manufacturing jobs and increases in the retail sales field, the gap between the State's per capita income and the Valley's is widening each decade. Building upon the existing resource-based economy (agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and natural environment) in a sustainable manner becomes the central guiding elements of the future economic development of the Valley. Eighty-five percent of business growth in rural Northern California communities is occurring from expansion of existing business. This success is derived from economic development strategies that look at niche marketing based on existing resources rather than expending resources on attracting business expansion from outside the area.5 Looking at long-term trends, the number of full-time jobs filled in Mendocino County has been going up coincident with proportionally smaller employment in the seasonal timber industry. The support for this is four fold: . In surveying the resource based jobs throughout the county and looking at expanding these job opportunities through remanufacturing it is clear that such jobs will provide higher wage and improved benefits to the community. The average wage of manufacturing jobs is 2.2 times the average wage of retail trade jobs. In turn manufacturing jobs will provide for greater tax revenues and support city and county infrastructure. Remanufacturing accomplishes another goal, one of reducing the seasonal cycles of unemployment. 2. Logistically, building upon business sectors with existing resources and services is more economical and feasible than creating entirely new businesses. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah llJll Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.3. Economic Development 4, Page 3 . Some of the area's existing renewable natural resources are unique and provide current and long-term business niche opportunities. These opportunities include products derived from fruit and related processing, winegrapes and viticulture, and a still-available timber industry. 4. A resource-based economy provides long-term viability when managed in a sustainable manner. Looking deeper into the type of business development that is occurring in rural California, research indicates that of the 85 % local development, more than 50 % of this development occurs in business with less than twenty employees. Bearing this in mind, the economic development strategies of the future must identify mechanisms that will allow smaller resource based businesses to compete in a global marketplace. Job growth in the '90s and beyond will come primarily from those business that are overcoming their structural problems in meeting new market demands. The formation and support of cooperatives has proven to be an extremely successful strategy in the wood products industry in Oregon and Washington. Collectively, the small business community is a vital sector of the area's future economic development. It needs help in joining together to create strength in the marketplace. This can be effectively accomplished within a single structure which can communicate the needs of the local economy. This concept needs to be embraced as a successful strategy for communities such as ours and expanded into the other aspects of our resource economy. With the desire of the Community to see more job development in the Valley, there is a need to coordinate training and retraining efforts of existing educational institutions and organizations to provide for these changing employment needs. This need can provide training in a system that coordinates industry need with available educational services and facilities. Providing training within the community can provide job opportunities to those calling the valley "home." The Ukiah Business Enterprise Center formed in 1993 provides a central clearing house that serves to connect existing and prospective businesses with people and educators who can help meet their labor needs. More than matching labor forces, the Business Center also provide assistance in preparing business plans, networking, as well as other ongoing support work. Although the general concept for economic development is to create new employment opportunities through service and manufacturing employment, retail has its place in the community. In the downtown area, small retailers -- provide a combination of values in revitalizing the City's core area. Specialty retailers -- proprietorships and partnerships -- help attract business to the downtown. As activity downtown increases, so will interest in renovation, all-day activities, and the general economic health and value of the area. The City has adopted a Downtown Master Plan to achieve these goals. The City needs to provide support services to help meet the needs of existing local businesses. This is the simplest method of sustaining the local economy -- encouraging expansion and the health of local businesses. The type of support that the City and County can provide includes assisting the Chamber of Commerce, Mendocino College, Ukiah Unified School Districts, and business groups to provide technical assistance and other resources to small businesses. The visioning process preceding preparation of the General Plan shows the interest of the community is to reflect the social and ecological values of the area in future economic development. An objective of area economic development is to complement the available resources and labor market by aiming programs at businesses that are compatible with local values. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.3. ECOnomic Development 4, Page 4 city of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomia .... 3.02 3.02.01 The Community's needs: Continued economic growth Summary of major findings In 1992, the City funded an economic study to provide recommendations and analysis of economic issues. The Study found that industrial and manufacturing employment had declined since 1980 in all fields except food processing. 10 The greatest amount of increased employment opportunities were found in the retail and service sectors. Government employment increased by about twenty percent in the 1980s -- although increases in Federal and City employment have been partially offset by attrition and lay-offs by Mendocino County in the 1990s. Traditionally, retail and service sector jobs pay employees lower wages with fewer benefits than manufacturing jobs. The City's economic study also cited the service sector's lower multiplier effect. This effect is the process by which activity in one industry catalyzes an activity in related industries, resulting in additional locally generated incomes. An example is the winery that purchases wooden gift boxes that are produced by a local woodshop which buys the wood from local timber companies. In this example, the process of selling a wine gift boxes generated income for two additional local businesses. In order to counter the trend towards increased retail employment, the Economic Study recommended that recruitment and attraction efforts focus on businesses paying higher than retail wages and offering year-round employment opportunities. The visioning process identified that these types of businesses were strongly desired by the community at-large. The challenge is to attract businesses that can function in the Valley's environment. Attracting new manufacturing may be difficult for industries that must ship large or heavy products. Although Ukiah is located on US 101 and has a good truck link to the Sacramento Valley, its distance from the Bay Area may make supplying a manufacturer difficult or at least more expensive. However, certain types of industries -- timber-related, food and food processing, mail order, and manufacturers of express shipper sized products -- could find the Valley an attractive setting that does not result in excessive shipping or production costs. While timber-related employment has been declining, other manufacturing-related employment has shown steady increases. The increases, however, have not been adequate to offset the timber industry job losses. In agriculture, the number of new jobs has increased nearly twenty percent since 1985. The largest acreage of agricultural crops are wine grapes and pears. Apple orchard acreage ranks a distant third. Retail employment has increased by nearly sixteen percent since 1985. As Ukiah becomes a regional shopping center for the North Coast, retail employment is expected to continue to grow, eventually producing the largest number of new jobs. The addition of WalMart and other proposed major retail expansion will add hundreds of new retail trade positions. Increased retail sales increase local sales tax dollars -- which is fast-becoming the largest source of unencumbered local government revenue -- but retail sales may not be contributing to the local private economy. The Ukiah Valley needs to achieve a sustainable economic balance. There must be a balance between the dollars generated by creating products within the region which are sold elsewhere and the dollars spent on products produced elsewhere and sold in the Valley. In industry, this concept is called "vertical integration.' Some larger industries use this approach to control the complete development of a product from raw materials through distribution to resellers. For the Ukiah Valley, the concept would be to attempt to bring related industries to the area that would complement each other as suppliers and buyers of related products so that from raw materials to product, as much production, manufacturing, or assembly is complete in the region. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.3. Economic Development 4, Page 5 Ukiah serves the transient visitor with its tourism industry. The Valley has not been successfully promoted or marketed as a visitor destination. For this reason, although there was nearly $2.4 million spent in Ukiah motels (incorporated area only) in 1990, there are no full service hotels, no motels with conference facilities, and few of the properties provide any resort or destination facilities to serve as a central attraction for visitors. Most accommodations are designed for the overnight guest needing a place to sleep or eat before moving on to their final destination. The tourism market has not effectively exploited the concept of "stay and play an extra day" in the Ukiah Valley. 3.03 3.03.01 Opportunities for the future: Economic Development Strategy Summary of major findings In 1993, the City Council and Redevelopment Agency adopted an Overall Economic Development Strategy for the purpose of "...concentrating and coordinating efforts, [City] opportunities, and resources." The strategy is intended to be a framework and strategy to guide three principal economic development activities. When successfully implemented, these activities -- business recruitment, business retention and expansion, and job training -- will enhance the economic climate and quality of life in the Valley. The full economic development strategy is reproduced in Appendix VIII.5. The Strategy centers on an overall goal to "[a]ttract or assist in the expansion of a minimum of three manufacturing based businesses per year over the next five years which results, cumulatively, in the creation of at least 250 new jobs to the Ukiah Valley." The program adopted by the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency includes program goals in three categories: (1) Recruitment and development of new business; (2) Business retention and expansion; and (3) Job training. The recruitment and development of new businesses requires that the City focus its energy on attracting manufacturing businesses that are resource-compatible with the Valley. This would follow the visioning concept of attracting businesses that will take existing area resources -- such as timber and agriculture products -- and add "value" to make a marketable product. The concept of added value is to take a raw material and add or change it through processing or manufacture into a product which is then shipped to a market. Many times, value added businesses can be started with smaller staffs and financial commitments. This approach makes it easier for the City to provide support and for new businesses. In addition, the Strategy seeks to attract the headquarters and corporate offices of target companies. When a business brings its entire operation to the Ukiah Valley, it is more likely to make a stronger commitment to the community in terms of environmental preservation and the development of public facilities. This type of recruitment will add a high-end executive level employment base. As Mendocino's county seat, the City of Ukiah offers an available variety of professional and legal services. The Ukiah Valley also offers an exceptional quality of life. Additionally, compared to many areas in California, the Ukiah Valley's housing stock offers more home for similar dollars. Retaining and expanding existing businesses is the best means of improving the economic climate. An existing business already located within the Valley has a commitment to the community and its employees. Expansion from a proven base is much easier to finance and less expensive to implement than a complete relocation. The Strategy includes goals to assist businesses in achieving success and creating an effective business climate. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California VI.3. Economic Development ~, Page 6 Job training improves the value of one of the area's important resources -- its people. As the timber industry continues to reduce its need for new employees, the focus must be on training people to provide labor for new and expanded local businesses. There are several job training facilitation agencies in the Valley. There are federal assistance programs. The school system needs to be integrated into the process as well. The Strategy calls for coordinated efforts which will educate, apprentice, and train members of the community for skills sought by local businesses. One avenue could be to create a youth-oriented job training or apprenticeship program. Such a program could teach needed skills that would provide employment opportunities for local youth. The components of the program could include: Initiate awareness and outreach programs with the designated job training coordinator and the educational community to orient youth to available job training programs; City, through the Ukiah Business Enterprise Center, would take the lead in establishing youth apprenticeships/mentoring programs within local government and small business; Encourage youth participation in economic development policy setting forums in our community; Under the auspices of the Ukiah Business Enterprise Center, develop plans for youth oriented businesses run by peers. 3.03.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal ED-l: Support a strong local economy. Policy ED-I.I: Take steps to reinforce the Valley's economy. Implementation Measure ED-I. 1 (a): Maintain and keep current the Economic Development Strategy designed to meet the Valley's vision and needs. Implementation Measure ED-I. 1 (b): Continue to carry out the Redevelopment Plan for the City. Implementation Measure ED-1.1 (c): Continue to carry out the Downtown Master Plan for the City. Implementation Measure ED-I.I(d): Continue to carry out the Economic Development Strategy as adopted by the City. Implementation Measure ED-1.1 (e): Provide a City-County coordinated effort to encourage expansion of agricultural opportunitiies to diversify the Valley's economic base. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 1 4 LAND USE HE LANr} USE ELEMENT is one of the seven mandatory elements California law requires to be part of a General Plan. The purpose of the Land Use Element is to identify the locations and types of land uses that are to be designated throughout the City and Planning Area. Land use classifications are intended to show the future use of lands during the life of the Plan. The Land Use Element provides broad classifications for how land can be used. These classifications are the foundations upon which the land development code -- zoning and subdivision regulations -- are developed. These implementing regulations determine the precise land uses that are permitted or condi- tionally permitted on a piece of property. The General Plan is not intended to be as precise in identifying specific land uses. Traditionally, land use designations were first applied by creating a General Plan Land Use Map and then defining why one parcel is "commercial" while another down the same street might be "residential." In contrast, the Ulciah General Plan and Growth Management Program builds a series of layers that identify important resource and infrastructure issues that have an effect on the density and intensity of land use. All policies developed within the General Plan come to fruition with the assignment of land use classifications. A culmination of all General Plan policy programs, the Land Use Element defines what kinds of uses can occur and where they can occur. Decisions on land use designations are based on the goals of the entire general plan. The Land Use Element is organized with an introduction describing the role of the Element. This is followed by policy programs related to "legally existing non-conforming land uses." The future growth of the City limits is next, defining policies related to annexation and land use in the Sphere of Influence. Land use classifications, descriptions of the purposes, typical uses within each classification, and siting policies comprise the balance of the Element. 4.01 Introduction Land use designations broadly define the potential uses of a site. For instance, a site designated within the General Plan for residential use may be developed with a residential use; it may not, however, be developed with a commercial or industrial use. Each of these types of uses carries a different economic value to the property owner. In some cases the use allowed under the General Plan land use designation may be the highest and best use in terms of economic benefit to the property owner but, then again, it may not be. Economic benefit to the property owner is not a criterion for determining the appropriate land use designation. Rather, decision making bodies review the goals, policies and implementation measures contained within the entire General Plan and make land use designations which facilitate the accomplishment of the Plan's goals and implementation of the Plan's policies and implementation measures. The designation of a piece of land for a particular use does not mean that the use will be developed. Many other factors influence the actual development of a site including the desires of the property owner, the presence or absence of infrastructure improvements (roads, water, sewer, etc.) and the marketplace. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 2 If the market does not economically justify developing a parcel into a particular land use, it will remain undeveloped or under-developed until market conditions change. In some situations, a land use may be proposed that the public is willing to "subsidize" because of the overall or long-term benefit delivered to the community. The re-allocation of incremental taxes~ in the Redevelopment Area is an example of the public benefit subsidy of market forces. Other public subsidies to encourage new development or redevelopment in the area include fee waivers, fast-track permit processing, or special tax abatements. In limited situations, the City or County can provide f'mancial support through the sale of bonds or interest reductions. The physical features of the Ukiah Valley make it an attractive place to live. These features also provide development constraints2 such as the flood plains, steep hillsides, prime agricultural lands, and unstable geologic conditions. These development constraints limit the likelihood of Ukiah turning into a sprawling hill-to-hill, developed, urban area. Infrastructureis commonly viewed as roads, water supply, and sewage disposal. It also involves all facets of connecting people to commerce. This includes telecommunications, electric power, police protection, fire protection, local staff personnel, public buildings, parks, and the ability of the City, County, and special districts to maintain or improve those services. Land cannot be relocated nor can it be renewed. Designation of its use will have a long-lasting effect on the particular parcel being evaluated and on other lands in the surrounding area. Although a parcel of land may have a number of potential uses -- some desired by the property owner, some desired by the public, and others directed by Plan policies -- some of these uses may have to be limited to ensure that the parcel's use reflects the goals and policies of the General Plan. The impacts and or requirements of one land use may be in direct conflict with other land uses. For instance, industrial land uses often produce loud noises and require the presence of hazardous materials. Were a residential land use to be located directly adjacent to an industrial use conflicts might exist between the two: the risks associated with the use of hazardous materials may be intolerable given the presence of young children and old people (sensitive populations) nearby, the noise produced by industrial uses may be intolerable given the residential nature of the adjacent land use. When two land uses adjoin that have mutually exclusive requirements, they are considered to be "incompatible." Sometimes incompatible land uses are separated with a "buffer."3 A buffer may take the form of a physical feature--such as the Russian River, US 101, the railroad, streams, or canyons. It may also be other land uses--such as landscaping, greenbelts, or even the nonaccess side of recreational areas. The Land Use Element is organized to identify the broad land use classifications and also the criteria that are used to classify a parcel of land within the classification. The term "land use classification" and "land use designation" both have the same meaning and refer to the written criteria and location on the General Plan Land Use Map. The terms "district" or "zone" refer to how a parcel is categorized in the qncremental taxes are the revenues collected by the Redevelopment Agency to reinvest in its Redevelopment Area. :A constraint is a physical characteristic of a site that limits potential development by increasing the potential cost beyond that of a feasible return or makes site development an unsafe public hazard. aA buffer is a physical separation between developed portions of two adjoining parcels. The buffer may be a natural feature, such as the Russian River, or it may be an undeveloped strip of landscaping or native terrain that provides a physical separation. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use ~, Page 3 land development code and on the zoning map. Although all zoning districts must be consistent with the General Plan classification (residential zones can only be located within residential districts), there may be more zones than General Plan classifications for land. The Land Use Element contains a "Land Use Population Density and Building Intensity" chart to provide a further explanation. 4.02 Legally Existing Non-Conforming Land Uses 4.02.01 Summary of major findings Whena re-written, use may change for all parcels in a General Plan is land classifications neighborhood to reflect the future development pattern desired for that area. When this occurs, there are sometimes land uses which were legally approved and permitted prior to the adoption of the re-written General Plan that no longer conform to the land use classification's requirements. These land uses, which are colloquially called grandfathered land uses, are actually legally existing non- conforming land uses. This term means that the use was legally in place prior to the adoption of the Plan but it no longer conforms to the permitted uses allowed by the revised General Plan. Similarly, there are structures that have been in the same location for many years --such a long time that the structure may even pre-date zoning or planning requirements. These structures may have been used over the years for a variety of uses that are suited to the structure but have never "conformed" to zoning codes. This type of structure is called a legally existing non-conforming structure. It is entitled to similar policy protections as legally existing non-conforming land uses -- provided that continuous use is maintained. It is the objective of the Land Use Element to ensure that all legally existing uses of land shall continue to be allowed regardless of the new land use classification implemented by this Plan. References to "codes" in this section refer to land use and zoning codes; the Uniform Building Code (UBC) is not covered under this reference. This section of the General Plan does not have any policy program that relates to whether a structure was built to the applicable standards of the UBC. California law allows standards to be applied that protect the established property rights and ensure that a use or structure can be reestablished if it is unintentionally destroyed in a fire or other disaster. In the event of a disaster resulting in damage or destruction of a land use, the property owner may be entitled to rebuild the legally existing non-conforming use or structure to the same density or intensity that existed prior to the damage, without being required to obtain a conditional use permit, provided that the rebuilding begins within a twenty-four month period of time following the event. The structure itself, however, would be required to comply with current building code standards and current site development regulations. Within the incorporated City limits, no further development or expansion of a non-conforming land use is permitted, a long-standing City zoning code standard. The goal of this policy is to ensure that legally existing non-conforming land uses do not develop into problem land uses due to expansion or enlargement. The County, because of its historical development patterns, has conditionally permitted the expansion of legally existing non-conforming land uses. In order to expand, a conditional use permit must be approved by the Planning Commission. In reviewing a conditional use permit for enlargement of a Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use ~, Page 4 legal non-conforming land use, the Planning Commission considers the type of expansion and its effects on the surrounding area. The County also considers what type of conforming development has occurred surrounding the non-conforming land use. The expansion may warrant a need to upgrade buildings to meet the County's current building code and site development standards (such as parking, land- scaping, or other site development standards). The County has long maintained a policy that "similar" or "less intensive" uses may replace legally existing non-conforming land uses. Structures and uses which do not conform to land use regulations and cannot demonstrate their legal existence -- having been built (structure) or begun (use) without City or County permits -- shall not be afforded the same rights and protections of legally existing non-conforming structures and uses. California law has long established that a use, structure, or parcel of land that was created in violation of ordinances or regulations cannot be "grandfathered." The City and County development codes may establish an "amnesty" date before which all existing structures and uses are considered to be legally established. Record keeping for older projects in both the City and the County is far from comprehensive. This makes it difficult to determine when some older land uses were initiated or structures built. Uses and structures that are determined to have commenced or been built before the amnesty date will be presumed to be legally existing land uses or structures. 4.02.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs Goal LU-I: Protect legally-existing, non-conforming land uses. Policy LU-I.I: Continued use of legally existing non-conforming land uses is allowed in confor- mance with approved permits. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 5 Implementation Measure LU-I.1 (a): Legally-existing non-conforming land uses may continue operations under original permits following adoption of regulations that make the use non-conforming.4 [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Community Development, County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure LU-I.I(b): As long as the use is continuous c~r ':a ,nat abandc~ncd for A pcrlc, dA~ .....~. .... "-- ' '~ ....... ': ........ --~- "- legally existing conform ,, o, alS,,. ,. u,~,s,, ,.,s,: -.o,,1 ,.o,,..,,,,,~, .,o. l~,~,, - non- - lng land uses shall be permitted to continue operations without conforming to new General Plan or other codes enacted after the establishment of the use. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: City Community Development. County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure LU-1.1 (c): In the event of a complete or partial destruction of a legally existing non-conforming land use, allow reconstruction to the same or lesser density or intensity in conformance with the current General Plan and building codes.5 [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Community Development, County Department of Planning and Building] Impl LU-1 l(d) "':'~':- "- .... : .......... ' " -": .... "'~'~ Planr2ng Arcs ementation Measure . ; ,, sums .lS~ ,,...,,o,},o. a,,,, vo,,sos..- o, ,,s~ The Ci~ or County may conditionally approve an expansion of a legally existing non-conforming land use through the Conditional Use Permit process. This ......... t.~11 ...... 1 .... 1~--.-1 .... :,1..-'--,u~ ,.*,:,.. _t Tnr;,,~. [Tim fra fo completio .s.,..,~,.-,. o,..-., s,o, -l-'t-'-J' lb'-' -~-,,,, --"~' ..s,.. ,..,lb: o. ,.,,,~..,. e me r n: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: County 4, Agency/Departmentresponsible: County Department of Planning and Building] Policy LU-I.2: Allow reestablishment of legally existing non-conforming land uses that have been abandoned for twenty-four months or less. Implementatio Measure LU-1 2(a) '- '~ .... : ..........' '~ -': .... "'~'- Plant. lng '--~ M~,,do~,:-~,~ ~e ::CiW::or Coun~ shall have ~e au~ori~ to make fmdMgs ~at a legally existMg non-co~o~Mg l~d use may be replaced by a subsequem non- co~o~g l~d me if ~e subsequem me ~ "s~ar to' or "less Mteme" ~ ~e me it ~ replacMg. Such a c~ge M l~d me sh~l occur wi~ ~en~-four mon~ of the abandoment of ~e original legally-existMg non-confo~Mg land use. 4In the event that the use or structure was legally established prior to permitting requirements, the standard applied to the use or structure shall be to ensure conformance with basic public health and safety requirements. qf there are specific circumstances unique to the project site that would preclude reconstruction of the use if strict conformance to the site development standards or current zoning standards were applied, a variance may be considered through the normal variance review process. This footnote is a part of Implementation Measure LU-la(3) for purposes of clarification. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 6 G oal LU-2: [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: County Agency/Department responsible: County Department of Planning and Building] Illegally established non-conforming uses and structures cannot become "legally existing." Policy LU-2. I: Enforce current land use and zoning codes and site development standards when uses or structures have never been legally established. Implementation Measure LU-2.1(a): Uses or structures which were never established in conformance with applicable land use or zoning codes, land use or zoning plans, or land use or zoning regulations shall be required to seek appropriate permitting under provisions in effect at the time of discovery of the illegal use or structure. Failure to be able to conform to current regulations shall not be a basis for approval of a variance as a remedy for the use's or structure's inability to conform to current land use or zoning codes. Abatement of an illegal use or structure pursuant to the City or County zoning codes shall be a permitted remedy. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department re- sponsible: City and County Planning] Policy LU-2.2: Consider special circumstances when determining if a use or structure is not legally existing. Implementation Measure LU-2.2(a): City and County zoning codes sections addressing non- conforming uses or structures may, at the option of the agency, include a threshold date -- based on agency building or planning records -- to be used to define that a structure built or use established prior to the date is presumed to be valid. The property owner of a use or structure believed to be illegally existing shall provide tangible proof that the use or structure predates the cut-off date in order for the City or County to make the appropriate finding that the use is valid. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Short-term6planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/De- partment responsible: Planning Departments] 4.03 Land use policies 4.03.01 Summary of major findings Whencomes to use policies, are two significant competing sets of interest. One is it land mere the objectives of a property owner to maximize the financial value or equity of property. The other is local government's the overall vision of the Community, and maintaining an inventory to meet the long-range needs of its citizens. Sometimes the objectives of property owners and local government coincide. Sometimes the two interests diverge. The Land Use Element -- and its policies displayed graphically on the Land Use Map -- represents the balance between interests as defined by the City and the County for the area of the General Plan. Combining the policies from all of the elements provides a comprehensive foundation for assigning land use classifications. Some of the issues considered with land use include (1) constraints such as slopes, 6Although this is assigned to the short-term planning period, the City or County may implement it at any point in time that the agency updates its zoning code or finds it appropriate to add an amendment for this measure. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program , , , VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 7 floodplain, and noise contours; (2) resources -- agricultural lands, the Russian River corridor, riparian corridors, and grazing lands; and (3) infrastructure -- transportation corridors, alternatives to the car, levels of service, sewer, water, fire protection, and other governmental services. Individual land use categories -- residential, commercial, industrial, and resource -- have siting criteria and characteristics that are used to fine tune the allocation of land uses in the General Plan. 4.03.01(A) Agricultural lands. Agricultural lands and urban areas need to be separated by a stable limit to urban expansion. This concept is to prevent the "domino" effect in which one agricultural parcel converts to an urban use followed by the next and the next and so on. Maintaining agricultural lands is an important land use policy within the General Plan. The Policy is built from the "right to farm" provisions in the Open Space and Conservation Element which protects active agricultural lands in the Valley. Agriculturally-viable soil is a fixed resource -- it cannot be replaced. 4.03.01(B) Residential uses. While the Housing Element focuses solely on the City's needs to ensure lands for 775 new residential units over the next five years, the County also has residential land requirements for the Ukiah Valley. The Mendocino Council of Governments -- which is responsible for assigning the "fair share" housing needs -- identifies that the unincorporated County in the Ukiah Valley Area has a five year housing need of 1,431 units.7 Residential land allocations must ensure that (1) there is adequate land area within the County to meet this need over the next five years; and (2) that County residentially-designated lands annexed into the City result in a transfer of the regional housing fair share from the County to the City. Because the Sphere of Influence proposes to be the ultimate City boundaries, the land uses in the Sphere should be at population densities and building intensities compatible with those permitted in the City. New residential land use patterns need to be located in areas where the new populations can be served by local government without placing undue fiscal strains on the new property owners, the City, the County, or various special districts. Urban-scale land uses -- low, medium, and high density residential -- generally need to be located west of U.S. Highway 101 where there are adequate public facilities and services. West of the river there is a generally adequate system of roads, feasible means of providing transit, closer proximity to employment, and fewer conflicts with environmental constraints. The vision to maintain quality of life issues and resource protection is best achieved with urban development locating west of the highway. 7Mendocino County Board of Supervisors, Mendocino County General Plan Housing Element (Ukiah: Mendocino County, April 26, 1993), Table 10.2-5, page 1-61. The data in the Unincorporated Ukiah area includes lands outside of the General Plan Planning Area. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California ~/I.4. Land Use ~, Page 8 4.03.01(C) "Urban" areas within the Ukiah Valley: Calpella, the Forks, North State, and Talmage There are four distinct areas in the General Plan that define where new urban-scale land uses may be sited. These are (1) the City of Ukiah; (2) the Ukiah Sphere of Influence;8 (3) the Rural Communities (Calpella, The Forks, Talmage) and the North State Complex; (4) Master Plan Areas? The City of Ukiah is the central city to the Ukiah Valley -- and much of Mendocino and Lake counties -- serving as a regional center of employment, shopping, and housing. As a full service City, Ukiah is able to provide services to urban development in a fiscally responsible manner. The Ukiah Sphere of Influence represents an area that may be the ultimate City limits during the life of the General Plan (a twenty year period). Virtually all portions of the proposed Sphere are located within range of city services. With the potential for annexation, the Sphere of Influence is a likely area in which urban land uses may be sited. Within the unincorporated Planning Area there are three Rural Communities -- Calpella, Talmage, and The Forks. Calpella is a community developed around a lumber mill which is now closed. The community has a mix of all densities and character of residential uses, commercial, and industrial land uses. Calpella is recognized as an area in which future community land uses may be sited. The Forks is a former train station at the forks of the Russian River branches. The area is a central commercial and industrial community that connects rural residential communities north and east of the Russian River branches with the main highway and the City of Ukiah. Talmage also has a mixture of residential densities, limited commercial uses, and agriculturally-related industries. It also has a private religious institution, the City of Ten Thousand Buddhists. Talmage has served as an agrarian center, and community belief is that this role should continue, and intense commercial or non-agriculturally related industrial uses should not be proposed in this area. The North State Complex is not a Rural Community of residential, commercial, and industrial uses. Rather, it is a central point of business and commerce for portions of the unincorporated County. The area has long been developed with heavy industrial uses, such as the Masonite Mill and the Louisiana Pacific Mill. The intent of the North State Complex is to become an exclusive commercial and industrial area. Master Plan Areas are a new classification in the Ukiah Valley. Master Plan Areas are intended to cover lands proposed for "specific plans," "area plans," or as "planned unit developments, l0 A Specific Plan is called out in California law as an adopted plan that provides precise development standards and policies for an area of land. State law specifies what must be included in a Specific Plan.. Sometimes a private developer, the City, or County would prefer to have a less precise development proposal to be considered for adoption. The role of the Master Plan Area is to permit an area within the Ukiah Valley ~he Sphere of Influence referred to in the General Plan is based on the Sphere of Influence proposed by the Plan and not the current adopted Sphere. The final boundaries of the Sphere are subject to adoption by the Mendocino County Local Agency Formation Commission. 9The Lovers Lane Specific Plan Area, which is an type of Master Plan Area is within the City's Sphere of Influence. ~°While the General Plan was being prepared, a Specific Plan proposal is pending for the Lovers Lane area north of the City. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 9 to be designated for more precise, site specific studies prior to approving subdivisions or other uses. This is to be called a "Master Plan Area." A Master Plan area permits the following: · Amending the General Plan to show an area of one or more ownerships as a location for which a separate planning document has been prepared. · Preparing an area plan for the Master Plan Area that will identify land use and other development and environmental policies applicable to the defined area. · Master Plans need not address all elements of the General Plan, but only those elements and policies applicable to the area. However, General Plan policies not addressed in the Master Plan still apply to the Master Plan area. · Master Plans must be consistent with the General Plan. The Master Plan Area land use classification is to be applied to the parcels contained within a Master Plan or a Specific Plan at the time of adoption by the City or County. If the General Plan is undergoing an update or revision, and a Master Plan or Specific Plan is being prepared, the revised or updated General Plan may show the subject property as a Master Plan Area. G 4.03.02 General Plan goals, policies, and implementing programs oal LU-3: Protect agricultural lands from urban encroachment. Policy L U-3. I: Retain agricultural lands as areas in which urban land uses shall be precluded. Implementation Measure LU-3.1(a): The Land Use Map shall depict locations for urban land uses as the City of Ukiah, the City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, the Rural Communities, and the North State Complex. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Commissions] Implementation Measure LU-3.1 (b): Densities for new parcels within the Agricultural land use classification on the Land Use map shall be limited to one dwelling per forty or more acres. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Department of Planning and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure LU-3.1(c): Densities for new parcels within the Rural Residential land use classification on the Land Use map shall be limited to one dwelling unit per one or more acres. At a minimum, the density shall be based on the siting criteria identified in the Plan, Population Density and Building Intensity. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: City Department of Planning and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure LU-3.1 (d): Densities for new parcels within the Remote Residential land use classification on the Land Use map shall be limited to one dwelling unit per forty or more acres. At a minimum, and depending on the slope of the parcel, the density shall be based on the siting criteria identified in the Plan and on Table VI, VI.4, 4-44, 44, Population Density and Building Intensity. [Timeframe for completion: Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use ~, Page 10 Ongoing planning period .I, Measure applies to: City and County ~. Agency/Department re- sponsible: City Department of Planning and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure LU-3.1 (e): Densities for new parcels within the Range and Resource Land use classification shall be limited to one dwelling unit per one hundred and sixty or more acres. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure ap- plies to: City and County · Agency/Department responsible: City Department of Planning and County Department of Planning and Building] Implementation Measure LU-3. I(D: No commercial or industrial land uses shall be permitted outside of the urban areas (the City of Ukiah, the City of Ukiah's Sphere of Influence, the Rural Communities, and the North State Street Complex) of the General Plan, unless defined as agriculturally related. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning pedod ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Planning Commissions] Implementation Measure LU-3.1 (g): No land uses shall be approved for which a finding can be substantiated that the new use will have an unmitigated adverse impact on existing agricultural land uses and businesses. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Commissions] Goal LU-4: Policy L U-4.1: Balance the housing needs of the City and County. The City shall respect the County's need to provide an adequate inventory of land to accommodate its fair share of housing for the unincorporated Planning Area. Implementation Measure LU-4.1 (a): As a condition of annexation of residential lands from the County, the City's Housing Element shall be amended to increase the City's housing fair share by the number of needed housing units the County is surrendering. The County's Housing Element shall be amended to reflect the reduction in housing "fair share." [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing Measure applies to: City ~. planning period ~. Agency/Department responsible: City Council] Implementation Measure LU-4.1(b): In reviewing applications for development within the unincorporated County submitted to the City for comment, the City shall give consideration to the County's regional "fair share" housing needs. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Planning Department] Goal LU-5: Generally urban residential land uses shall be located west of the Russian River. Policy LU-5.1: Locate Low Density, Medium Density, and High Density Residential Land uses predominantly west of the Russian River and near urban areas. Implementation Measure LU-5.1 (a): The following table shall identify where urban residential land use densities may be located within the Ukiah Valley: [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period ~, Measure applies to: City and County ~, Agency/Department re- sponsible: Planning Departments] Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Uklah ~1, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 11 Table Vl.4--42: Urban Residential Land Use Siting Goal LU-6: Utili~.e Master Plan Areas to meet precise planning needs. Policy LU-6.1: Allow the use of Master Plan Areas to provide for mixed use development, transit- oriented development, and other precise-planning needs for larger ownerships or groups of ownerships. Implementation Measure LU-6.1 (a): Master Plan Areas may be initiated through General Plan Amendments by property owners, the City, or the County as a means of meeting comprehensive planning needs or special and unique circumstances that are best served through a planning document that focuses on a particular area. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agen- cy~Department responsible: Planning Departments] Implementation Measure LU-6.1(b): Master Plan Area policies shall be consistent with the General Plan, although Master Plan Area policies may be more specific and precise than the General Plan, or the policies may address more issues than identified in the General Plan. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Departments] Implementation Measure LU-6. I (c): Policies within the General Plan that are not specifically addressed in a Master Plan shall apply to the Master Plan Area. [Timeframe for com- pletion: Ongoing planning pedod 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Depart- ment responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure LU-6.1(d): When a Master Plan is adopted, the General Plan land use map shall be amended to show the area of the Master Plan as the "[Name of Plan] Master Plan Area,' with the notation to "refer to the [Name of Plan] Master Plan.' Adopting the Master Plan shall be deemed the action that also amends the General Plan land use map. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Moa- sure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure LU-6. I (e): Specific Plans meeting the requirements of California law may be substituted for Master Plans when it is the preferable planning program. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. 'Land Use 4, Page 12 City of Ukiah Jl~ Mendocino County, California [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure LU-6.1 09: Master Plans shall be adopted utilizing the same process as a General Plan amendment. [Timeframe for completion: Ongoing planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: Planning Department] Implementation Measure LU-6.1(g): The area of the Lovers Lane Specific Plan shall be identified on the Land Use Map as the "Lovers Lane Master Plan Area." Any other master plans or specific plans that are in progress shall be identified in the General Plan as the "[Name of Plan] Master Plan Area." [Timeframe forcomplotion: Short-term planning period 4, Measure applies to: City and County 4, Agency/Department responsible: City Planning Department, County Department of Planning and Building] 4.04 Resource lands 4.04.01 Agricultural Land Use (AG) 4.04.01(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: The Agricultural Lands classification applies to lands which are suited for and are used for production of crops, most lands under agricultural preserve contracts, land having present or future potential for agricultural production, and contiguous or intermixed smaller parcels on which non-compatible uses could jeopardize the agricultural use of agricultural lands. Lands within the AG classification are protected from encroachment of incompatible uses by the "Right to Farm" provisions of the Open Space and Conservation Element. Agriculture lands are intended to include both the growing, raising, and harvesting of agricultural produce, fruit, or livestock. In addition, based on performance standards established in the development code, uses related to the production or processing of agricultural products may be permitted or conditionally permitted. 4.04.Of(B) General Plan poficies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Single family dwellings, orchards, row crops, irrigated pasture, grazing land, vineyards, Christmas tree farms, farm and ranch labor housing, agriculturally-related industries, wineries, food processing; mineral resource extraction. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Location: Parcels to be included in the AG land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah, City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Rural Community areas, Master Plan Areas, and the remainder of the Unincorporated Planning Area. Access: No requirements for farming, orchards, or ranching. Processing and production may have limitations based on the proposed use and traffic generation. Access to new structures: New related uses, such as food processing or wineries, may be required to have paved access depending on the type of general traffic, public access, and other issues. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 13 Design review: Exempt for individual single family dwellings, farms, ranches, and orchards. Wineries or processing facilities may be required to be reviewed. Maximum building intensity: No limitation for farms, ranches, and orchards. Agricultural product processing facilities may have limits through the use permit process. Maximum residential density: One dwelling unit per forty acres of land area. Second dwellings: One second dwelling subject to an administrative permit within the unincorporated Planning Area. Labor housing may be permitted with an administrative use permit or conditional use permit review. Special development issues: Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Developmentalternative: Density transfer and cluster development permitted. 4.04.02 Range and Resource Lands (RL) 4.04.02(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: The Range and Resource Lands (RL) classification applies to lands which are suited for and are appropriately retained for the grazing of livestock, timber production, and mineral extraction and production. The classification includes other lands generally in range use, intermixed smaller parcels and other contiguous lands, the inclusion of which is necessary for the protection and efficient management of range lands. The Range and Resource Lands classification includes lands which have been identified and are classified as mineral resource lands, and lands utilized for commercial timber harvest and reforestation. Range and Resource Lands may also include lands which are appropriate for conservation as natural resources, such as steep hillsides. 4.04.02(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Single family dwellings, agricultural uses, forestry, cottage industries, farm and ranch labor housing, uses determined to be related to and compatible with ranching, conservation, processing, and development of natural resources, recreation, utility installations, mineral resource excavation, extraction, and processing. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Location: Parcels to be included in the RL land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, and the remainder of the Unincorporated Planning Area. Access: No requirements for fanning, orchards, or ranching. Processing and production may have limitations based on the proposed use and traffic generation. Access to new structures: New related uses, such as food processing or wineries, may be required to have paved access depending on the type of general traffic, public access, and other issues. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 14 " Design review: Exempt for individual single family dwellings, farms, ranches, and orchards. Wineries or processing facilities may be required to be reviewed. Maximum building intensity: No limitation for farms, ranches, and orchards. Agricultural product processing facilities may have limits through the use permit process. Maximum residential density: One dwelling unit per one hundred and sixty acres of land area. Second dwellings: One second dwelling subject to an administrative permit within the unincorporated Planning Area. Labor housing may be permitted with an administrative use permit or conditional use permit review. Special development issues: Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Development alternative: Density transfer and cluster development permitted. 4.04.03 Remote Residential (RMR) 4.04.03(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: The Remote Residential (RMR) classification applies to lands that might also meet the "Rural Residential" criteria, except that the parcels are on steep slopes or at the top of ridgelines. Generally, RMR parcels do not have direct access to a publicly-maintained paved road. 4.04.03(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zo.e Examples of allowable uses: Single family residences, agricultural uses, cottage industries, public facilities, conservation and development of natural resources, and recreation, utility installations. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Location: Parcels to be included in the RMR land use classification may be located in the remainder of the Unincorporated Planning Area. Access: Paved or gravel, public or private road. Maximum density: One dwelling per forty to eighty or more acres. Second dwellings: One second dwelling subject to an administrative permit within the unincor- porated Planning Area. Special development standards: With the exception of density and parcel size, the standards of the RR classification apply. Developmentaltemative: Density transfer and cluster development permitted. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJlr, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4'. Land Use 4, Page 15 4.05 Residential Land Use 4.05.01 Density, Density transfer, and second units 4.05. Of(A) Density and density transfer. The General Plan is prepared with each land use identified in terms of density. Density is the amount of land area needed for each dwelling unit. Although this is the reverse of how most people think of zoning -- which establishes a minimum size of a parcel -- density allows for more flexibility. By not establishing a minimum parcel size in the General Plan, the City and County Planning Commissions have more flexibility in developing zoning regulations, site development standards, and an ability to review a project based on site specific considerations. The following is an example of this flexibility: Assume a subdivider has a ten acre parcel with a General Plan density which allows up to four units per acre. This translates into an ability to create 40 developable lots. Were a minimum parcel size established, in this case ~A -acre lots, the subdivider would have to create 40 one quarter (0.25) acre parcels. This would allow the subdivider very little flexibility in lot layout and design. If the 10-acre original parcel contained sensitive land areas, such as wetlands, riparian corridors, landslide areas, etc., there would be very little a developer could do to avoid impacting these areas. However, if the General Plan designates a density only, the subdivider can design the subdivision to keep sensitive lands undeveloped and place the forty development sites on smaller parcels. The City and County can make the determination if the project meets General Plan goals. This process is known as a "density transfer;" the density from one portion of the property was transferred to other portions of the same property~. If the subdivision were to be approved with the forty units on eight acres with two acres remaining in open space, the City or County would zone the property into the appropriate base zoning district (Rural Residential (RR) or Single Family Residential (R1)) and combine it with a classification which restricts the property from being further subdivided. This General Plan classification is the Existing Lot Size (X) designation. The "X" nomenclature will be added to the City and County zoning codes as a "combining" or "overlay" district. The "X' serves as a full disclosure to future buyers that the property cannot be further subdivided. 4.05.01(B) Second units California law permits local governments to allow "second units" on property zoned for residential development. Sometimes called "granny flats," "accessory dwellings,' and "cottage units," second units basically increase the density of any residential parcel by one unit. This General Plan allows second units in the Agriculture, Resource, Rural Residential, and Low Density Residential land use classifications. They are not allowed in the Medium and High Density Residential classifications, nor in the Commercial, Industrial, Recreation, or Public classifications. With the exception of Industrial and Public, the other uses in this group allow multiple family residential land uses, which incorporates the ability to build more than one housing unit. The City allows second units with a conditional use permit hearing. The County requires an administrative permit. No changes are proposed in the processes used by the two agencies. ~'Density Transfers can also refer to the ability to transfer the development of one parcel to a completely different parcel. This, however, is not the type of density transfer referred to in this section. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah J~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. 'Land Use 4, Page 16 4.05.01(C) Density bonus and affordable housing incentives The General Plan, as well as California law, encourages construction of housing units that are affordable to all segments of the population. Generally, the focus on affordable housing is to establish the rent or typical mortgage are within the payment ability of a family earning 120 percent or less of the area's median income. To encourage private development of affordable housing, the City and the County provide opportunities for "density bonuses." A density bonus allows a developer to construct up to twenty-five percent or more dwelling units than the General Plan density permits; by State law, the additional density still complies with General Plan consistency requirements. More than twenty-five percent densities may be allowed by local ordinance as a means of achieving Housing Element objectives to provide shelter to special need populations. When a proposed density bonus conforms with the policies of the Housing Element, it is automatically consistent with the Land Use Element, even if the land use densities are exceeded. For example, a parcel with a density of ten units would result in the actual construction of twelve units, if at least two were priced for qualifying families. The number of units targeted for qualifying families and the number of units in the "bonus" are established at the discretion of the City or County during the project review process. Other incentives -- ranging from infrastructure cost assistance, modification of development standards, to outright grants -- may be available for private developers as a means of encouraging affordable housing. The Housing Element discusses some of the available programs and opportunities in more detail. 4.05.02 Rural Density (RR) Residential 4.05.02(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: The RR classification applies to single family residences, residential dwellings on large parcels, and estate residential lands. The RR classification is intended to encourage local small scale food production (farming) in portions of the Planning Area which are not well suited for large scale commercial agriculture as a result of current or potential land uses in the area, slope, soils characteristics, parcel size, or general location. Lands within the RR classification with a density of one unit per ten acres or less are intended to remain as large parcels unless it is infeasible for surrounding lands to be used for agricultural purposes. One of the objectives for retaining a larger parcel size in the Planning Area, even though a specific parcel may not be suitable for agricultural use, is to ensure that nearby or adjoining agricultural lands are not impacted by residential uses. Through the use of policies related to site characteristics, the RR classification is intended to have multiple densities beginning at one dwelling unit per one acre of gross land area. In extreme cases, up to eighty or more acres may be required. 4.05.02(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable land uses: Single family residences, small scale agriculture, businesses in the home or cottage industries, public facilities, conservation and development of natural resources. Although clustering of dwelling units is permitted, residential dwellings in the RR classification are to be detached single family homes. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 17 Location: Parcels to be included in the RR land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah, City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Rural Community areas, Master Plan Areas, and the remainder of the Unincorporated Planning Area, with the exception of the North ...... :~ '-~ .....;~ Complex. State "' Access: Within thc City, new parcels shall be served by roads with a level of service of A, B, or C. Within the unincorporated Planning Area, new parcels of less than five acres shall be served by roads with a level of service of A, B, C, or D. New parcels served by roads with levels of service of E, or F shall be five acres or larger. Access to new structures: Inside City limits, driveways shall be paved; in unincorporated areas, driveways may be gravel or paved. Design review? Not required, except in hillside areas. Planned Unit Developments and Master Plan areas within the RR land use shall include design standards in the Plan. Maximum density: One single family dwelling per one acre of gross land area~3, except as follows: A range of larger parcel sizes based on increasing average parcel slope shall be required on hillsides when the average parcel slope is equal to or greater than the percentage specified in the Hillside Development ordinance enacted to carry out the General Plan. For an interim basis, the percentage shall be 21% or greater; Within the unincorporated Planning Area, parcel sizes may range from one (1) to eighty (80) or more acres. Within areas with severe slopes or other development constraints, new parcels may be precluded and densities established at one single family dwelling per existing parcel. On roads with a gravel surface: One single family dwelling per five acres. Second dwellings: Discretionary upon review and approval of a conditional use permit within the City; discretionary upon review of an administrative permit in the unincorporated Planning Area Special development issues: Access roads or driveways in hillside areas shall be limited to a grade accessible to City or Fire District equipment and within the City, the access roads or driveways shall be paved. Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible f'nrc protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. ~2Design review means the public or agency review of the aesthetics of development: building appearance and character, colors, landscaping, location of parking, siting of the structure on its building site, and other issues related to the appearance characteristics of the development. ~Within the unincorporated area of the County, parcels within the RR-1 or RR-2 classification may be 40,000 or 80,000 square feet of gross land area respectively. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah J~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use ~, Page 18 Density transfer and cluster development permitted, although the City or County may require a one acre minimum parcel size even with clustering. Geotechnical conditions on specific sites may require larger parcel sizes or constrained building envelopes. When parcels are in areas that for environmental or other reasons cannot be further subdivided, the Existing Lot Size (X) classification is combined with the RR classification. A designation of RR-X means that the property cannot be further subdivided. 4.05.03 Low Density (LDR) Residential 4.05.03(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: The Low Density Residential classification is intended to provide lands for detached or attached single family residences. This designation is the traditional suburban style or City neighborhood style development density. The LR classification is for lands within the City, the Sphere of Influence, Master Plan Areas, and within Rural Communities south of~ Sphere of~uence, or large subdivisions or planned unit developments. 4.05.03(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Single family dwellings, in the County the LR classification includes mobile home parks within the maximum permitted density, businesses in the home or cottage industries; public facilities; places of public assembly. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Location: Parcels to be included in the LR land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah, City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Rural Community areas, Master Plan Areas, and fronting North State Street between The Forks and Calpella Rural Communities. Access: New parcels may be located on roads classified as County Rural Collector, Major Collector, Minor Collector, Residential, or on North State Street between The Forks and Calpella Rural Communities, with a level of service of A, B, or C, and on roads with a Level of Service D in the unincorporated Planning Area. Access to new structures: Paved surface required for densities higher than one dwelling unit per acre. Design review: Not required. Planned Unit Developments and Master Plan areas within the LR land use shall include design standards in the Plan. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ilJl, Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4'. Land Use 4, Page "19 Maximum density?4 One to six dwelling units per one acre of gross land area with public water and public sewer; one dwelling unit per 12,000 square feet of gross land area with public water or public sewer; one dwelling unit per one acre of gross land area with well and septic system. On roads with a Level of Service of C and D in the City only, E, or F, the maximum density is one unit per five acres of gross land area. Second dwellings: Discretionary upon review and approval of a conditional use permit within the City; discretionary upon review of an administrative permit in the unincorporated Planning Area. Special development issues: New dwelling units in the LR classification may be attached or de- tached single family units. When parcels are in areas that for environmental or other reasons cannot be further subdivided, the Existing Lot Size O0 classification is combined with the LR classification. A designation of LR-X means that the property cannot be further subdivided. Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Density transfer and cluster development permitted. 4.05.04 Medium Density (MDR) Residential 4.05.04(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: Medium Density Residential lands are intended to provide land area for a range of densities and a variety of housing types and ownerships, including townhomes, multiple family residential development, mobile home parks, and more urban-scale density development. Lands classified for MR densities shall be located within the incorporated City, Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Master Plan areas, or Rural Communities. MR lands are intended to be located in proximity to parks, schools, and public services. 4.05.04(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Single family dwellings, duplex or triplex units, apartments, townhomes, planned unit development, mobile homes parks, places of assembly, public facilities, businesses in the home that generate minimal onsite customer traffic. Three or more units on a single parcel are considered "multiple family residential," even if the units are detached. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Location: Parcels to be included in the MR land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah, City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Rural Community areas, and Master Plan Areas. ~nIn the AG, RMR, RL, LR, and the Medium and High Density Residential classifications, density is used as the standard for number of units per acre rather than parcel size to allow flexibility in development design. The size of parcel is an issue reviewed as a part of the overall project design related to its specific site. The maximum density within the classification cannot be exceeded. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use · Page 20 Access: New parcels may be located on roads classified as Arterial, County Rural Collector, Major Collector, Minor Collector, or County Residential with a level of service of A, B, C, or D. Access to new structures: Paved surface required. Design review: Required; individual single family homes constructed on individual parcels and not as part of a planned unit development or Master Plan Area are exempt. Maximum density: One to fourteen dwelling units per one acre of gross land area with public water and public sewer; one dwelling unit per 12,000 square feet of gross land area with public water or public sewer; one dwelling unit per one acre of gross land area with well and septic. Second dwellings: Not applicable. Two single family dwellings or a duplex are permitted uses. Special development issues: Landscaping and onsite open space or recreation areas are required for projects when design review is required. On roads with a level of service of E or F, the maximum density is one dwelling unit per existing parcel. Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Density transfer and cluster development permitted. 4.05.05 High Density (HDR) Residential 4.05.05(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: High Density (HR) Residential lands are intended to be used to site apartment or townhome projects to meet the diverse needs of the population in terms of mixed types and affordability of housing. The HR classification is permitted within the incorporated City, the Sphere of Influence, and in the Rural Communities of Calpella and The Forks. The HR classification is also permitted as a part of a planned unit development or Master Plan Area. The HR classification is also intended to provide opportunities for limited neighborhood-directed commercial development that is designed to serve the needs of a residential area. 4.05.05(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Single family dwellings, duplex or triplex units, apartments, townhomes, planned unit development, mobile homes parks, places of assembly, public facilities, businesses in the home that do not generate or require onsite customer traffic in order to succeed. Condi- tional uses may include neighborhood-directed commercial uses in high density residential neighborhoods -- a convenience store, video rental, laundromat, hair stylist, or similar types of uses that are sized and intended to serve the needs of the immediate neighborhood area are appropriate uses. Three or more units on a single parcel are considered "multiple family residential," even if the units are detached. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 21 Location: Parcels to be included in the HR land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah, City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Rural Community areas, Master Plan Areas. Access: New parcels may be located on roads classified as Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, or County Rural Collector with a level of service of A, B, C, or D. Access to new structures: Paved access required. Design review: Required; individual single family residences on an existing single family parcel, unless part of a planned development or other project where design review is required, are exempt. Maximum density: One to twenty-eight dwelling units per one acre of gross land area with public sewer and public water; one dwelling unit per 12,000 square feet of gross land area with public water or public sewer; one dwelling unit per one acre with well and septic. Second dwellings: Not applicable. Two single family dwellings or a duplex are permitted uses. Special development issues: Landscaping and onsite open space or recreation areas are required if design review is required. On roads with a level of service of E or F, the maximum density is one dwelling unit per existing parcel. Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Density transfer and cluster development permitted. 4.06 4.06.01 Economic development land uses Commercial (C) 4.06.01(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: The Commercial (C) classification applies to lands appropriate for a variety of commercial uses. Lands classified Commercial shall sited be within the City of Ukiah, Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Master Plan Areas, or Rural Communities. Commercial lands shall be served by the publicly-maintained roads classified as Arterial, County Rural Collector, or Major Collector and in locations where future growth is anticipated. Commercial lands identify those areas of the General Plan where commerce and business may occur. Commercial uses may be managed and more precisely defined through the assignment of individual zoning districts. This ensures land use compatibility reflecting site specific conditions and requirements. 4.06.01(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Primary uses include retail, service businesses, general commercial, shopping centers, shopping malls, public facilities, places of public assembly, parking lots, and residential uses. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program Vl.4.'Land Use 4, Page 22 City of Ukiah ilJlk Mendocino County, California ,, Location: Parcels to be included in the C land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah, City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Rural Community areas, North State Complex, and Master Plan Areas. Zoning discretion: The City and County have the discretion to control the building intensity through the use of different zoning districts within the "C' classification. The City and County may specify zones that manage land uses on the basis of compatibility with adjoining land use or zoning. These controls may include limits to the types of uses -- such as offices, "light" commercial, medical offices, or convenience services -- that are less impactive on the neighboring land uses, particularly as the proposal relates to adjoining residential land uses. Access: Commercial parcels may be located on County Rural Collectors, Arterial or Major Collector roads with a level of service of A, B, C, or D. Access to new structures: Paved surface required. Design review: Required; single family residential dwellings on existing parcels are exempt from design review, except that at the time of conversion to a non-single family residential use, the property is subject to design review prior to the issuance of any permits, including business licenses. Maximum building intensity: With the exception of the Downtown Master Plan area when off- site parking is provided through a parking district, the maximum lot coverage shall be forty percent of the gross land area. Residential densities are up to twenty-eight dwelling units per acre provided that both public water and public sewer are available. On roads with a level of service of E or F, the maximum density is one dwelling unit per existing lot size. Public facilities: Connection to public water supply and public sewage disposal (where available) are required for new commercial development. If public water or public sewer are not available, new commercial development shall comply with the requirements of the Division of Environmental Health. Second dwellings: Not applicable. Special development issues: Landscaping and onsite parking required when design review is required. Exterior lighting shall be shielded from glare onto off-site properties. Conformance to noise standards required. Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. 4.06.02 Industrial (I) 4.06.02(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: Industrial lands are intended to identify those areas of the General Plan where manufacturing and major employment uses may occur. The Industrial classification applies to lands suited for industrial uses where public facilities and services (transportation systems, utilities, fire protection, water, and sewage disposal) exist or can be efficiently provided. Industrial uses may be sited where there Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program , , VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 23 can be the least impact to proximate uses and where the potential for environmental disruption is minimal or can be adequately controlled. Industrial uses may be managed through individual zoning districts to ensure a level of land use compatibility that reflects site specific conditions and requirements. New Industrial lands are intended to be located in the City limits, the Sphere of Influence, Master Plan Areas, or within the Calpella or The Forks Rural Communities or the North State Complex. Industrial uses are not permitted in the Talmage Rural Community. The Pinoleville Rancheria is a mixture of lands owned by the Pomo Indians and some private parcels. The County has long allowed a unique mixture of industrial uses on small parcels as well as property owner residences. Within the Pinoleville Rancheria, single family residences are allowed on lands designated as "I." Otherwise no residential uses, other than a caretaker, are permitted within the I classification. 4.06.02(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Primary uses: Processing and manufacturing, public facilities, places of assembly, fabrication and assembly, business centers, business parks, office parks, mixed commercial, office, and industrial sites. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Location: Parcels to be included in the I land use classification may be located in the City of Ukiah, City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Rural Community areas except Talmage, North State Complex, and Master Plan Areas. Zoning discretion: The City and County have the discretion to control the building intensity through the use of different zoning districts within the "C" classification. The City and County may specify zones that manage land uses on the basis of compatibility with adjoining land use or zoning. These controls may include limits to the types of uses -- such as offices, "light" commercial, medical offices, or convenience services -- that are less impactive on the neighboring land uses, particularly as the proposal relates to adjoining residential land uses. Access: Industrial parcels may be located on County Rural Collectors, Arterial or newly constructed or improved Major Collector roads with a level of service of A, B, C, or D. Access to new structures: Paved surface required. Design review: Required. Maximum building intensity: Maximum lot coverage shall be sixty percent of the gross land area. Public facilities: Connection to public water supply and public sewage disposal are required for new development in the City. Industrial uses in the unincorporated area may be exempt from water or sewer connection if approved by the Division of Environmental Health. Second dwellings: Not permitted. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use ~, Page 24 Special development issues: Lands classified as I shall be located within the incorporated City, Ukiah Sphere of Influence, Master Plan Areas, the Rural Communities of Calpella or The Forks, or the North State Complex. Landscaping and onsite parking required. Exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent glare on off-site properties. Other than a single mobile home for a caretaker, no residential uses are permitted in the I classification. In the Pinoleville Rancheria one single family unit is permitted and a second unit is permitted upon review and approval of an administrative permit. Conformance to noise standards required. Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. 4.06.03 North State '" ...... :-' '--"'-'-:-' Complex gUI 1 I1 I I~'1 ~,,~ I~l l--11 I ~l ~,~ I,I l~ll 4.06.03(A) Summary of major findings Purpose: The North State Cc, n-,ar,,crc~al-ln,5~'aa:r~al Complex identifies a fixed area that serves the long- term commercial and industrial development needs outside of the City. The Complex is not a land use classification, but an area into which commercial and industrial ("C" and "I") land uses may be placed. This area has long been developed with heavy industrial uses, including Masonite Hardboard and Louisiana Pacific. There are also a variety of community facilities and services, places of employment, and limited retail shopping. Although there are some residences and mobile home parks within the area, residential uses are not compatible with the density and intensity of commercial and industrial development in the area. Except for caretakers at industrial sites, new residential uses shall not be permitted, administrative, or conditional land uses regardless of the zoning district applied to a parcel. 4.06.03(B) General Plan policies identifying standards and requirements for the implementing program for this zone Examples of allowable uses: Primary uses: Industrial -- Processing and manufacturing, public facilities, places of assembly, fabrication and assembly, business centers, business parks, office parks, mixed commercial, office, and industrial sites. Commercial -- retail, service businesses, general commercial, shopping centers, shopping malls, public facilities, places of public assembly, parking lots, and residential uses. Siting issues for new parcels or new construction: Location: Along North State Street from US 101 to the south boundary of The Forks Rural Community Area. Access: Industrial and commercial parcels may be located on County Rural Collectors, Arterial or newly constructed or improved Major Collector roads with a level of service of A, B, C, orD. Access to new structures: Paved surface required. Design review: Required. Maximum building intensity: Per the "C" or "I" classification requirements. Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 26 Location: As designated on the General Plan land use map as "Rural Community." Industrial uses are permitted in Talmage. Access: New parcels may be located on any classification of road. Access to new structures: Paved surface required. City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, California No Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 27 Table VI.4-43: Land Use/Zoning Criteria in Rural Communities~ Design review: Required for all uses except single family homes on individual parcels. Maximum building intensity: Maximum lot coverage for commercial uses shall be forty percent and industrial uses shall be thirty percent of the gross land area. Maximum density: Within water and sewer districts - One to twenty-eight dwelling units per acre; Within water or sewer districts -- one unit per twelve thousand square feet; Not in a water or sewer district -- one dwelling per acre. Selection of land use classification for zoning purposes: The following table shows the minimum siting criteria that are used in judging the appropriate zoning district for a parcel of land within a Rural Community. No industrial uses are permitted in Talmage. Public facilities: Connection to public water supply and public sewage disposal are required when available; for new commercial developmem. Fire safety standards per the requirements of the responsible fire protection agency shall be satisfied within both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Second dwellings: Permitted subject to discretionary approval and review of an administrative permit by the County on parcels within single family residemial zoning districts only and within the County's RC zoning district. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 32 Figure Vl.4-O0: Land Use classifications within the City; South Area (overlaps other maps) Adopted by the City Council: September. 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use 4, Page 33 Figure Vl.4-PP: Land Use classifications within the Planning Area; North Area (overlaps other maps) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, California VI.4. Land Use ~, Page 34 Figure Vl.4--QQ: Land Use classifications within the Planning Area; Central (overlaps other maps) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VI.4. Land Use ~, Page 35 Figure Vl.4-RR: Land Use classifications within the Planning Area; South (overlaps other maps) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 0 0 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VII.4. Glossary ~, Page 1 Adaptive reuse. "Adaptive reuse" means the conversion of an existing building of historic, ar- chitectural, or cultural value from the use for which it was constructed to a new use compatible with neighborhood land uses by maintaining exterior integrity and adapting the interior to the new use. Added value. "Added value" means the practice of processing a resource through additional steps in order to generate additional wealth/jobs within the community before the resource is sent outside the community. Adequate. "Adequate" means a threshold meeting minimum standards established by either regula- tion, ordinance, code, policy, or accepted standards. Affordability. "Affordability" (in relation to housing) means the ability of a family to spend less than thirty-five percent of its gross income on the cost of shelter, utilities, taxes, and insurance. Agriculture lands. "Agriculture lands" means lands devoted toward the commercial growing of food and fiber. Agriculture preserve. "Agriculture preserve" means lands under contract in concert with the provisions of the California Land Conservation (VVilliamson) Act. These lands are primarily devoted toward the production of food and fiber, but may also include other lands. Aircraft. "Aircraft" means jets, airplanes, helicopters, hang-gliders, motorized gliders, and any form of aircraft whether or not it is regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Ambient noise level "Ambient noise level" means the composite of noise from all sources near and far. In this context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environ- mental noise at a given location. And/or. "And/or" means "or." If the Plan's direction is to accomplish "A" and "B," the word "and" is used. If the Plan's direction is to accomplish either "A" or "B" the word "or" is used. In certain situations in the Plan, the choice may be to state "and/or." If this is the case, it is used to denote that the Plan's direction is to accomplish any or all of the stated options. Accomplishing one option is as appropriate as accomplishing two or more. Annexation. "Annexation" means the legal steps and actions taken to attach a territory of land to an incorporated City or a special district. Archaeology. "Archaeology" means the scientific study of material remains of past cultures or human life and activities. Area Plan. "Area Plan" means a component of the General Plan that provides more precise planning information for an identified territory covered by the General Plan. An area plan does not need Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Uklah ~ Mendocino County, Califomla VII.4. Glossary ~t, Page 2 to conform to the full requirements of a General Plan or the requirements for contents of a Specific Plan. The Area Plan, however, must be internally consistent with the General Plan. /Esthetic qualities. "/Esthetic qualities" means the selected characteristics that are subjectively used to judge appreciation of the subject.. /Esthetics. "/Esthetics" means the placement of criteria or judgement of the attractiveness of a development, area, or project. Board of Supervisors. "Board of Supervisors" means the five elected officials governing the County of Mendocino. Building coverage. "Building coverage" also means "lot coverage." "Lot coverage" means the percent of lot area covered by a building footprint. "Building coverage" may also mean "density" when related to non-residential development. Building. "Building" means structure. "Structure" means shelter, building, dwelling unit, or other physical development upon the land to house, protect, store, or cover persons or things. Business. "Business" means a definition which includes agriculture but that preserves special distinctions afforded agriculture. California Code of Regulations. "California Code of Regulations" (CCR) means the published official administrative regulations approved by the Office of Administrative Law. The regulations are administered by various state agencies and have the force of law as if the regulations were enacted by the Legislature. The regulations are noted as 14 CCR § 15000, which reads "Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15000." Carrying capacity. "Carrying capacity" means the maximum number of persons, businesses, vehicles, livestock, vines, or other measurable numbers that can physically be accommodated in an area or on a parcel of land at a given time. Case law. "Case law" means an interpretation of a law to give it constitutional meaning by a Court of competent jurisdiction. An interpretation by an appellate court with jurisdiction over Mendocino County effectively modifies the law to mean that interpretation. ^ California Supreme Court decision affects the entire state. Federal Courts also effect case law. Citizen Advisory Committee. "Citizen Advisory Committee" (CAC) means the collected public membership of a group designated by the City Council to be responsible for recommending and preparing the content of individual General Plan elements. CAC may also be used in implementing programs to recommend the formation of an ongoing group to deal with issues after the General Plan is adopted. City limits. "City limits" means the area which is incorporated into the City of Ukiah as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission.~ Clustering. "Clustering" means a means by which lots are grouped rather than spread evenly throughout a parcel as in conventional lot-by-lot development, without increasing overall density permitted by the general plan. ~We were unable to find a "legal' def'mition. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VII.4. Glossary ~, Page 3 CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level. "Community Noise Equivalent Level" means the average equivalent sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of approximately five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and ten decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m.2 Commercial areas. "Commercial areas" means lands where the purchase, sale, or other transac- tions occur involving the handling of articles, substances, or commodities for the purpose of livelihood or profit. Commercial recreation. See "Recreation, commercial." Community development lands. "Community development lands" means lands devoted toward the principal uses of residential, commercial, industrial, or public facilities. Conserve, conservation. "Conservation" means the management of resources, including natural resources, cultural resources (includes archaeological and historic resources), and man-made resources in a manner that avoids waste, destruction, or neglect. Decibel (dB). "Decibel" means a unit for describing the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure, which is 20 micropascals (20 micro- newtons per square meter). Density. "Density" means for residential development, density is the number of residential dwelling units per acre. This tends to be reflected on parcels of one acre or less as "X units per acre of land area." For lands in which more than one acre is required for a residence, the density tends to be reflected as "X acres per dwelling unit." Department of Fish and Game. "Department of Fish and Game" means the California Department of Fish and Game. Design review. "Design review" means the public or agency review of the aesthetics of development: building appearance and character, colors, landscaping, location of parking, siting of the structure on its building site, and other issues related to the appearance characteristics of the development. Designated historic resource. "Designated historic resource" means a structure that is identified as being listed on the National Historic Register, a California Historical Landmark, included in the California Inventory of Historic Resources, or an identified point of interest. A designated histodc resource may also apply to historic buildings within an identified historic district even if the structure is only contributing or is not included on any of the historic lists or registers. Developer. "Developer" means a person, firm, corporation, partnership, or association who proposes to divide, divides or causes to be divided real property into a subdivision or proposes to build, or builds a building or buildings. 2CNEL and L~a represent daily levels of noise exposure averaged on an annual basis, whilgqL represents the average noise exposure for a shorter time period, typically one hour. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah · Mendocino County, California VII.4. Glossary ,e, Page 4 Development Elements. "Development Elements:" means the collection of the Land Use, Fiscal Impact, Economic Development, Community Design, and Housing Elements of the General Plan. Development. "Development" means the improvement of land for the purposes of accommodating land uses. Downtown. "Downtown" means the area identified in the Downtown Master Plan definition of downtown, and shown on the Downtown Map in Figure VI-5 on page VI-55. Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). "Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)" means a document prepared in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code {}21000 et seq. Draft General Plan and Growth Management Program. "Draft General Plan and Growth Manage- ment Program." means the version of the General Plan recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission. Dwelling unit. "Dwelling unit" means a single dwelling for habitation by individuals or families. Ecologically sustainable. "Ecologically sustainable" means a threshold at which the consumption of a renewable resource is equal to its replacement level. Element. "Element" means a component of the General Plan focusing on a development or resource issue. Encourage. "Encourage" means to provide courage, support, or other passive actions designed to ally with another jurisdiction, city, county, or district's active actions to accomplish an action. Energy. "Energy" means the capacity to perform work, most often in the form of electrical, thermal, or mechanical energy. Ensure. "Ensure" means to take specific actions or make financial commitments that are intended to accomplish, achieve, or carry out an action. The word "insure" is commonly used in place of "ensure," but "insure" implies a fiduciary responsibility. Family. "Family" for general purposes in the Plan means a group of individuals with a common bond by means of blood, marriage, or conscientiously established relations living together as a housekeeping unit shadng a dwelling unit. Within the Housing Element or any discussion that refers to "family income, "family"-means persons living together who are related by blood or marriage. Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). "Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)" means a document containing the contents of the Draft Environmental Impact Report, comments about the Draft, and responses to those comments as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. Final General Plan and Growth Management Program. "Final General Plan and Growth Manage- ment Program." means the version of the General Plan adopted by the City Council for the City of Ukiah or the Board of Supervisors for the County of Mendocino. The Final General Plan is also called the "General Plan." Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VII.4. Glossa~ ~, Page 5 Finding. "Finding" means reason that a recommendation is being presented as a goal. A finding represents the thought process, the reasoning, and any supporting factual evidence (optional) that provide a means for a reader of the General Plan to understand why a particular goal is proposed. Firebreak. "Firebreak" means a barder of cleared or plowed land intended to check forest, brush or grass rites. Fiscal Impact Analysis. "Fiscal Impact Analysis." means a component of the General Plan Resource Directory that provides statistical information from which the operational, capital, or personnel costs of the General Plan's implementation may be estimated or understood in general terms. Future Ukiah. "Future Ukiah" means the name that has been used to describe the overall General Plan revision and Growth Management process. General plan consistency. "General plan consistency." means conformance with the legal require- ment that each element of the General Plan has equal weight in the eyes of the law. No one element can contain policy direction that conflicts with the policy direction of other elements. Goal. "Goal" is a broad statements that provide the blueprint for the future. Each goal establishes what the City desires to accomplish over the life of the Element. Goals are what the commu- nity desires to achieve. Grazing lands. "Grazing lands" means lands used for the open ranging of livestock for the production of food or fiber. Greenbelt. "Greenbelt" means publicly owned and maintained common lands in or surrounding specifically defined area of the City. Any greenbelt or similar land use restriction for agricultural land shall include as a prominent part thereof: a. Preservation of the existing irrigation water rights and supplies in full; b. Implementation of an effective right-to-farm ordinance; Co Reimbursement to the property owner for the value of development rights, forfeited or lost; d. Mandatory use valuation assessment for property tax purposes as currently provided on enforceably restricted lands; e. Preservation of the rights for landowners to utilize new technology for farming purposes; and Appropriate mitigation by local planning agencies to facilitate long term agriculture viability of operations adjacent to urban phasing boundaries. Pdvate and public lands that form a network which shall consist of, and is not limited to, open space, agricultural, scenic easements, riparian corridors, voluntary open space ease- ments, parks, wildlife refuges, and Iow density residential uses, to maintain community separation and identity, recognizing the urban/rural nature of the City and its position in the Valley. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County, California VII.4. Glossary ~, Page 6 According to Webster's a belt-like area around a City reserved by official authority for parkland, farms, or similar land uses that normally do not require dense or intense development. Gross land area. "Gross land area" means the area of a parcel lying within property lines, including any areas reserved by easements or dedications for public purposes. "Net land area" is the acreage remaining after the dedicated areas are deducted. Groundwater. "Groundwater" means water stored in the earth which can supply wells and springs. Growth Management Steering Committee. "Growth Management Steering Committee" means the official committee appointed by the City Council and charged with the responsibility of combin- ing all research, all public beliefs, and the work of the Citizen Advisory Committees into the Preliminary Version of the General Plan. Hazardous materials. "Hazardous materials" means any injurious substance, including pesticides, herbicide, toxic metals and chemicals, liquefied natural gas, explosives, and volatile chemicals. Historic fabric. "Historic fabdc" is a term that refers to the visual character, physical materials, siting style of established neighborhoods and historic structures. Household. "Household" means the living arrangements of individual persons, groups of unrelated persons, or groups of related persons. Impervious surface. "Impervious surface" means a portion of ground area which has been overcovered, paved, developed, or otherwise compacted so that the absorption rate of the soil has been reduced from its rate of permeability prior to the activity. Implementation measures. "Implementation measure" means a program, direction, process, and system to put the General Plan into effect. In order to put the Element into day-to-day effect, implementation measures are adopted to provide instructions as to how projects are reviewed and what standards are to be achieved. For the most part, implementation measures are time specific or measurable standards. Time specific implementing measures tell the Council that a certain action is to be accomplished on at a specific time. This assists in planning budgets for the Road Department and Planning Department. Measurable implementation measures tell Staff which standards of review are to be used on an ongoing basis when assessing a project for approval. Incorporated area. "Incorporated area" means lands within the City limits of Ukiah. Industrial areas. "Industrial areas" means lands where the manufacture, fabrication, processing, or reduction occurs of any article, substance, or commodity. "Industrial areas" also means "employment centers." Industrial development. "Industrial development" means improvement of land for purposes of accommodating industries. Infrastructure Elements. "Infrastructure Elements:" means the collected group of elements ad- dressing the facilities and services needed to accommodate existing and future populations. These are the circulation, community facilities, historic and archaeological resources, airport, and parks and recreation elements. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VII.4. Glossary ~ Page 7 Initial Version of the Ukiah General Plan and Growth Management Program. "Initial Version of the Ukiah General Plan and Growth Management Program" (Initial Plan, Initial Version) means the General Plan workbook prepared by City staff and its consulting team for the use of the Growth Management Steering Committee. Intermittent streams. "Intermittent streams" means streams that flow during the wet season, continue to flow after the period of precipitation, and cease to flow during at least part of the dry season. Inundation. "Inundation" means to cover by flooding. Land capability. "Land capability" means the intrinsic ability of natural resource to support particular land uses. See also carrying capacity. Ldn: Day-Night Average Sound Level. "L~n: Day-Night Average Sound Level" means the average equivalent sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00 p.m. and before 7:00 a.m. Legislative actions. "Legislative actions" means an action by the City Council on behalf of the of the City of Ukiah or the Board of Supervisors on behalf of Mendocino County to ordain or enact a law or code. A General Plan adoption, changing a zoning district, and enacting a noise control ordinance is are examples of legislative actions. L,: Equivalent Sound Level. "l.,q: Equivalent Sound Level" means the sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. L,q is typically computed over 1, 8 and 24- hour sample periods. (Also see Footnote 37 on page VII-46). Lin,x: Maximum loudness. "l.~x: Maximum loudness" means the maximum sound level recorded during a noise event. L~: Loudness percentage. "~: Loudness percentage" means the sound level exceeded "n" percent of the time during a sample interval. L~o equals the level exceeded 10 percent of the time (L~o, Lso, etc.) Local Agency Formation Commission. "Local Agency Formation Commission" means the Mendocino County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) appointed pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act. Local business. "Local business" is meant to describe businesses within the sphere of influence of the planning project unless specifically stated otherwise. Lot coverage. "Lot coverage" means the percent of lot area covered by a building footprint. May. "May" means a permissive action that generally will permit a choice between two or more mandatory options. The use of the word "may" without providing defined choices means that the directive or action is optional -- either to be implemented or ignored. Mineral resource lands. "Mineral resource lands" means surface and subsurface lands which naturally contain chemical elements or compounds, or groups of elements and compounds formed from inorganic processes and organic substances but excluding geothermal, natural gas, and petroleum resources. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califomi=~ VII.4. Glossary ~, Page 8 Multiple family residential. "Multiple family residential" means a single lot or parcel upon which more than one dwelling unit is constructed and retained within a single ownership. Native vegetation. "Native vegetation" consists of all the plant, grass and tree species which naturally occur in the Ukiah Valley, and which exist and propagate without human intervention or assistance. Natural Resource Lands. "Natural Resource Lands" means lands devoted principally toward the conservation, preservation, and or development of water or land resources. Natural resources. "Natural resources" means anything in the physical realm (not man made) that can be used or is identified through the human senses of smell, sight, sound, odor, or touch. Net land area. "Net land area" is the acreage remaining after the dedicated areas are deducted. Noise Element Guidelines. "Noise Element Guidelines" means the guidelines for preparing a noise element from the Office of Noise Control. Noise exposure contours. "Noise exposure contours" means lines drawn about a noise source indicating constant levels of noise exposure. CNEL and Ldn contours are frequently utilized to describe community exposure to noise. Office of Planning and Research. "Office of Planning and Research" means the Gubernatorial support agency of the State of California serving the Governor. Open space. "Open space" means as defined in Government Code §65560(b): "Open-space land" means any parcel or area of land or water which is essentially unimproved and devoted to an open-space use as defined in this section, and which is designated on a local, regional or state open-space plan as any of the following: (1) Open space for the preservation of natural resources including, but not limited to, areas required for the preservation of plant and animal life, including habitat for fish and wildlife species; areas required for ecologic and other scientific study purposes; rivers, streams, bays and estuaries; and coastal beaches, lake shores, banks of rivers and streams, and watershed lands. (2) Open space used for the managed production of resources, including but not limited to, forest lands, rang eland, agricultural lands and areas of economic importance for the production of food or fiber; areas required for recharge of ground water basins; bays, estuaries, marshes, avers and streams which are important for the management of commercial fisheries; and areas containing major mineral deposits, including those in short supply. (3) Open space for outdoor recreation, including but not limited to, areas of outstanding scenic, histodc and cultural value; areas particularly suited for park and recreation purposes, including access to lake shores, beaches, and rivers and streams; and areas which serve as links between major recreation and open-space reservations, including utility easements, banks of rivers and streams, trails, and scenic highway corridors. (4) Open space for public health and safety, including, but not limited to, areas which require special management or regulation because of hazardous or special conditions such Adopted by the City Council: Septe~-,ber, 1995 City of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VII.4. Glossary ~, Page 9 as earthquake fault zones, unstable soil areas, flood plains, watersheds, areas presenting high fire risks, areas required for the protection of water quality and water reservoirs and areas required for the protection and enhancement of air quality. Overall General Plan Goals and Policies. "Overall General Plan Goals and Policies" means the pdmary goals and policies establishing the parameters within which all other goals and policies must fall. Park, pocket. "Pocket park" means a public space of greenery and places to sit or relax that is not large enough to provide land area for organized or active recreation activities. Generally pocket parks do not have picnic areas, but may have small playground areas. Perennial stream. "Perennial stream" means streams that flow throughout the year. Planning area (definition in law). "Planning area" means "any land outside of the [City's] boundaries which in the [City's] judgement bears a relation to its planning.''3 (Please refer to the second paragraph in Chapter II.A.1 located on page 11-2) Planning periods. "Planning periods" mean that timeframe in which an activity is to take place. The short-term planning period is from the date of adoption through year five; the intermediate- term planning period is from years five through ten; and the long-term planning period is from years ten to twenty. Policy. "Policy" means a further definition a goal to establish City policies. The policies provide direction to Staff, the public, and future councils as to how each project is to be reviewed under the provisions of the Circulation Element. A policy breaks the goal into achievable segments. Policy document. "policy document" means an adopted written program that is intended to provide direction to the City or County in reaching development-related and capital improvement- related decisions. Potential agriculture uses. "Potential agriculture uses" means unrealized or undeveloped uses of land which are related to the commercial production of food or fiber. Preliminary Version of the Ukiah General Plan and Growth Management Program. "Preliminary Version of the Ukiah General Plan and Growth Management Program (Preliminary Plan)" means the General Plan recommended by the Growth Management Steering Committee for the Planning Commission's action. Preserve, preservation. "Preservation" means the management of resources, including natural resources, cultural resources (includes archaeological and historic resources), and man-made resources in a manner to maintain and protect, preclude destruction, and otherwise keep from harm, spoilage, destruction, or danger. 3"Each planning agency shall prepare and the legislative body of each county and city shall adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency's judgment bears relation to its planning. Chartered cities shall adopt general plans which contain the mandatory elements specified in Section 65302." (Government Code Section 65300) Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VII.4. Glossary ~, Page 10' City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, Califomi= Public-private facilities. "Public-private facilities" means those facilities and/or grounds that are jointly developed, owned or operated by public and private entities. Public sewer. "Public sewer" means a public entity formed under provisions of California law for the purposes of collecting, treating, and disposing of liquid waste, septage, or sewage. Public water. "Public water" means water for domestic or irrigation use which is collected, stored, or delivered to users by a public entity formed under provisions of California law. Quality of life. "Quality of Life" means the term as it is used in the Vision Statement. Quasi-judicial actions. "Quasi-judicial actions." means an action based on the discretionary judgement and interpretation of the local government. Quasi-judicial decisions may be delegated by the City Council or Board of Supervisors to appropriate appointed bodies, such as the Planning Commission, Redevelopment Authority, or a Design Review Committee. Recreation, commercial. "Commercial recreation" means a land use with the primary purposes of providing to the general- or a limited-public a recreation-based or -oriented service by a private entity or proprietorship. Examples include and are not limited to a private fish hatchery with fishing, a privately owned campground, or river-based resort. Regulatory program. "Regulatory program" means an implementation measure that is intended to carry out General Plan policies with the force of law or administrative code. Residential areas. "Residential areas" means lands which are principally used for dwelling units and associated uses, although it may also be used for secondary, nonresidential purposes. Residential development. "Residential development" means the improvement of land for the purpose of accommodating dwelling units. Resource Elements. "Resource Elements" mean the collection of General Plan elements addressing issues related to the natural and human environment. This includes the Open Space and Conservation, Noise, Safety, and Energy elements. Riparian corridor. "Riparian corridor" consists of the aggregate vegetative and associated wildlife areas occurring along the entire length of a natural, freshwater course of water. Riparian vegetation. "Riparian vegetation" means plant material living near or on the banks of watercourses or lakes. SEL (Sound Exposure Level) or SENEL (Single Event Noise Exposure Level). "Sound Exposure Level" or "Single Event Noise Exposure Level" means the level of noise accumulated during a single noise event, such as an aircraft overflight, with reference to a duration of one second. More specifically, it is the time-integrated A-weighted squared sound level for a stated time interval or event, based on a reference pressure of 20 micropascals and a reference duration of one second. Sewage. "Sewage" means any liquid waste containing organic or inorganic matter in suspension or solution. Shall. "Shall" means a mandatory action that is not subject to discretion or variance. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Uklah · Mendocino County Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program VII.4. Glossary 4, Page 11 Should, could, can. "Should," "could," or "can" mean "may." Even though these words are commonly used in everyday written documents and conversations, if used within the General Plan, these words precede permissive actions. "Should" also means that if circumstances permit an action may occur. "Could" also means that if there is support or desire to carry out an action it may occur. "Can" also means "could." Solar access. "Solar access" means direct, unobstructed exposure to the sun's rays. Sound leveL "Sound level" means the sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very Iow and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear and gives good correlation with subjective reactions to noise. Special district. "Special district" means a local governmental entity formed under provisions of California law for purposes of providing a public utility or service. Sphere of influence. "Sphere of Influence" means a "...plan for the probable, ultimate, physical boundaries and service area of the [City] as determined by the [Local Agency Formation] Commission." (Government Code §56076) Structure. "Structure" means shelter, building, dwelling unit, or other physical development upon the land to house, protect, store, or cover persons or things. Subdivision ordinance. "Subdivision ordinance" means the legislative code enacted to regulate the review, process, and action associated with dividing land into more than one saleable parcel. Substantive businesses. "Substantive businesses" means businesses that provide for living wages and have a multiplying effect on business by creating or encouraging spin-off business activity. Suitability. "Suitability" means the ability of certain basic facilities (such as roads, water systems, sewage disposal systems, etc.) to support certain uses of land. Sustainable. "Sustainable" means any process which can maintain production over long time periods without harm to community and depletion of resources. Timber. "Timber" means trees of any species maintained for eventual harvest or forest product purposes, whether planted or of natural growth, including Christmas trees, but not including nursery stock. Traffic Management Plan. "Traffic Management Plan" consists of a plan or strategy for reducing demand on the road system, and a comprehensive strategy to address the problems caused by additional development, increasing trips, and a shortfall in transportation capacity. The "Traffic Management Plan" concept focuses on more efficiently utilizing existing transportation systems rather than expanding them. Unincorporated area. "Unincorporated area." means lands under the jurisdiction of the County of Mendocino. Viability. "Viability" means economic or physical feasibility. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino County, California VII.4. Glossary ~, Page 12 Viewshed. "Viewshed" means the area that can be viewed by a person when looking in a specific direction. Generally, a viewshed means a wide panoramic view that is unobstructed with no visual distractions and identified or preserved/conserved for public enjoyment. A narrow viewshed, such as a tree-lined street, is generally called a "streetscape.' Vision Statement. "Vision Statement" means the five part declaration of what the people of Ukiah in 1992 believe the City should be in twenty years. Week long economy. "Week long economy" means business activity that occurs on weekends and after work hours. Will. "Will" does imply "shall," but in legal terminology "shall"is always defined as mandatory, and "will" is not defined. Zoning ordinance. "Zoning ordinance" means the legislative code enacted by the City or County to regulate the physical development and use of land. Adopted by the City Council: September, 1995 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County ¥111.1. Wildl[Je habitat Inventory ~ Page 1 Adopted by the City Council Uid-h Vnlley General Plnn nnd Growth Mnnngement Progrm Viil. I. Wildlife hnbitnt inventory, ?a§e ~ Cit), of Ukiah dl~ Mendocino Count),, Adopted by the City Council City ,of Ukiah ~ Mendocino Count), Uidah Vnlley C, enernl PI,,.* 'nd Growth M~'.,f,~e----;~t Progra- ViIi. I. Wildlife hnbitat inventory. Page WILDLIFE AND BOTANICAL INVENTORY AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Salamander Newt Ensatina Toad Frog Turtle Lizard Arboreal Black Salamander California Slender Clou( Northwestern Pacific Gian' California Red-bellie~ Ro,.u..~.h-ski nned Western : Bullf.r..o.~ Foothill Ye llow-le~,g....e~,.. Pacific Tree-frog Red-legged Southwestern Pond Western Pond Northern A [!!..g...a..t,.o..r, Sagebrush Adopted by the City Council Ukinh Valley General Pinn and Growth Management Progrnm VilLI. Wildlife hnbitat inventory 4. Page 4 City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino C~-.nty, California Loon Grebe ~o o ----~. o .~. v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v, v, v, Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Southern ^11 i,~...a.!.,o..r, Western Fence Western Skink Snake California K i n.~..s...n..a...k.,~ Common Garter Common Kin Gophe Racer Ringneck ~ubber Boa Sharp-tai Striped Racer Western Aquatic Garter Western Rattlesnake Western Terrestrial Garter Corem{ Jarred Horned Pied-billed Western · Kite Black-shouldered Cormorant ' Adopted by the City Council ,C. ity of Ukiah dl~ Mendocino County Valley General Plan mhd Growth M~n~g~v-~--c~t VlII. I. Wildlife hnbitnt inventory. Page 5 Animals by Habitat Turkey Vulture Bald Moorhen Coot Killdeer Yellowlegs Ukiah Area Double-crested · Common American o, Grea~'~ : Spotted Least Common California Herring Ring-billed Canada : : Buffle-head Canvasback Sandpiper Dunlin Snipe Gull Goose Duck Adopted by the City Council IJIdah Yfflley General Plan amd Growth Manftl~emeni Prollrfum VIII. I. Wildlife habiLM inventory ~ ?a§e ~ Ci~ of Ukiah ~1~ Mendocino Count),, Californ;-, Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Common Goldene.y.,.e. Mallar( Norhthern Pinta il Redhead Ri..n..8. Rud( Shoveler Wood Osprey Heron Black-Crowned N Great Blue Green-backed E~,ret Great Sn, HaWk Coo Northern Gosh, Red-shouh Red-tailed Sharp-shinned American Kestrel Merlin Falcon · Green-winged Teal Hooded Mer · ......................................................................... .,c..,.o.~.~.o..~..~..e.~.~.z.,~ Adopted by the City Council .City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Uklah Valley General Plan and Growth Ma~%~ement Progra,,- VilI.I. Wildlife habitat Inventory 9 Page 7 Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Grouse Pere Turkey Quail Dove Hummingbird Blue · California Mountain Mournin.~ Rock Band-tailed Barn Flammulated Great Horned Northern P, Northern Saw-whet Western 5cree~i~ Common ": Vaux Adopted by the City Council Uldah Valley Genernl Plnn and Growth Mannt~ement Prol~r-... VILLI. WHdl!fe hnbitot inventory. Page 8 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Ca!iforni_. Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Woodpecker Flycatcher Belte~ Martin Swallow Jay Acorn Down~ Hai~ Lewi: Northern Flick~ Nuttall~,s. Pileated Red-breasted Sapsucker Western Kingbird Black Phoebe Olive-si~'~J Pacific Slo, Western Wood Pewee Barn Northern Rough-wi~i~]~ Tree Violet- Scrub Adopted by the City Council C,!t~ of Ukiah ~ Mendocino Count), Ukinh Vnlley General Plnn nnd Growlh Mn_nng~-'-~:lt Pro~rn-- ViII. I. Wildlife hnbitat inventory Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Stellar · American ,, Raven Chickadee Titmouse Bushtit Nuthatch Creeper Wren Di..p. per Kin.8.1et Common Chestnut-backed Plain Red-breasted White-breasted Brown Bewick's, ~.~..n..~..o...n, House Marsh Rock Winter American Golden-crowned Ruby-crowned Adopted by the City Council Uklnh Valley Genernl Pinn nnd Growth Mnnn~lement Progrnm VILLI. Wildlife hnbitnt inventory 4. Page 10 City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Californi-~ Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Bluebird Robin Thrush Western American Pi.,p.!,.t. .................................................................. : Thrasher Waxwin~ Wrentit Mockingbird Shrike Vireo Warbler Hermit Swain~;'~;'~: California Northern L o~ ~..e..r..h..e...a..d.. HuRon's Solitary Warblin~ 81ack-throated Gray Chat Hermit MacGillivay's Common Yellowthroat Nashville Orange-crowned Adopted by the City Council City of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County Uidnh Valley 6enernl P!~,,~ and Growth M-"-~.:---_-~t Prol~rs-- Viil. I, Wildlife 'habitat inventory, ?age 11 Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Townsendq Wilsonq Tanager Towheee Sparrow Blackbird Junco Oriole Finch Yellow Yellow-breasted Yellow-rumped Western California Rufous-sided ; Chippin Fox Golden-crowned Lark Lincoln'~i Rufous-crowned Savannah Son White-crowned B re we r' s R ed - .w..!.n..~..e..d., Dark-eyed Northern Adopted by the City Council .,Uklah Vafley Generni Plan and Growth Manallemen! Program VILLI. Wildlife habitat inventory ~ Pa§e ~2 City Of Ukiah ~ Mendocino County, Califo~b Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Crossbill Siskin Goldfinch Bunting Grosbeak Oposssum Shrew Mole Myotis Bat Hous~ Pu.r.p..!..e, Red Pine American Le ~'~'~i'~ Black-headed Evenin Trowbri( : Broad-footed California F ri.n..~..e.~ Little Brown t°n~z,.e.,a..?...d, Yuma Adopted by the City Council .City of Ukiah il~ Mendocino Coun~ Uklah Valley Gen_ernl Plan and Gro~h Mann~-_.e_-_t ¥111.1. Wildlife hnbitot inventory ,.. .. Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Big brown Hoar Palli Red Silver-haired Townsend'$ .~.!g..,%e..,a. ii~~ Rabbit Brush Hare Black-tailed $onom Squirrel California Groun( Western Gra .y. Gopher Botta'! Kan.g. aroo Rat ~. - California Mouse Brush Deer Hous~ Pi .n...y...o...n. Western Harvest Woodrat Dusky-footed Adopted by the City Council Uklnh Vnlley General PInn nnd Growth Mnn__n~i.~on_~ Pro~---- VIlI.I. ~fldlife habitat inventory. ?age ~4 City of Uki~h dl~ Mcndocino County, Californin Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Vole : Califorr Red Tree .......................................................................... ~';~';;;"'~'~;~i"~';;~'[~;~ Porcupone Coyote Fox Grin Bear B ·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.-%.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ : Raccoon ': : ;: ................... '~'i~'[ ......................... ' .......... ' ......... '"'" ......... "" ..... '"'"'"'"'"'"'" ................... · ~.;~ ............................................................................ ? .... ................... 'i~'i~;~'~"~;'~ ............................................................................ ............................ · ; .......................................................... ,...., .......................... ' Ermine ~;~'i ................................................................ ' ................... Long-tailed Skunk ................ Stri Western ................... '£i~';~' ................................................. : ......................... " Mountain Bobcat i-- ................... '~5'~'~;~: ......................................................... ,, ............ ~ ...... ,, ........... ' Black-ta Schad Adopted by the City Council Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Palli~ Re~ Silver-hair~J Townsend's Bi Rabbit Brush Hare Black-tailed ................... 'i~i~i'~'~'~';~'~ ................................... ,,, ........................................ 'Sonoma California Ground Do.u.~!.,a.?, Western Gra.y. Go~her : i ............................................................................... i~g~:~'"~' Kangaroo Rat ::: California Mouse Brush Deer Hot ............................................................................. · ............................ ,.P.,!~.~..o.~ Western Harvest Woodrat Dusky-footed Cit)' of Ukiah dl~ Mendocino Count), Ukinh Valley Genernl Plnn fund_ Growth MnnM~--=_-.t Progr- Vill. I. Wildlife hnbitat inventory ~ ?a§e ~$ Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Salmon American Threadfin King (Chinook Trout Rainbow (incl. anadromous Steelhead) Roach Squawfish Blacldish Shiner Sucker Bullhead Catfish Silverside Bass Bluegill Crappie California Sacramento Sacramento Sacramento Brown Black Channel White Inland !.~.,e..?..?..,L,.M....°.?..,"..~)...,S..t,~.!..P..~.d.. Adopted by the City Council ino County, California ¥111.1. Wildlile habitat inventory e Page 16 Ukiah Area Animals by Habitat Sunfish Black White Red~'~ !.~..e...n u s Micro Smallmouth Russian River Tule Bass Perch Adopted by the City Council ITEM NO. 10a DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY DRAFT "NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT" PREPARED BY MENDOCINO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF UKIAH Pursuant to AB 939, the City is required to prepare and adopt a "Nondisposal Facility Element" (NDFE) which identifies the nondisposal facilities which shall be used by the city to assist in reaching the diversion mandates of its Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE). A nondisposal facility is defined as a facility which recovers for reuse or recycling at least five percent (5 %) of the total volume of material received by the facility. A joint NDFE has been prepared by the Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority (MSWMA) on behalf of all of the participating jurisdictions. The MSWMA Board has reviewed the document and requested it be forwarded to the participating jurisdictions and AB 939 Local Task Force for review and comment. The AB 939 Local Task Force (LTF) completed a "preliminary" review of the NDFE at its November 16, 1995 meeting. The Task Force recommended identifying the need for additional comp, sting operations on the coast and a South Coast Transfer station in the NDFE, even though there are no known plans for such facilities at the present time. In the attached meeting minutes (Attachment No. 2) represents the Task Force action. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council review and comment on the draft NDFE. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: None. Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority Prepared by: Sue A. Goodrick, Public Works Administrator Coordinated with: Rick H. Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer and Attachments: . Candace Horsley, City Manager Draft Nondisposal Facility Element LTF Meeting Minutes of November 16, 1995 California Integrated Waste Management Board's NDFE regulations APPROVED:', Cand~ce Horsley, City {Vlanager R:I kI_.ANDFILL:kk ANONDISPOSAL.FAC [, Presentation of Preliminary Draft Nondisposal Facility Element Prepared by Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority on Behalf of the City of Ukiah December 6, 1995 Page 2 REVIEW PROCESS After review of the NDFE by the participating jurisdictions, all comments and concerns are to be returned to the MSWMA for incorporation into the final draft document. MSWMA will then send the final draft NDFE to the LTF for review. Within 90 days of receipt of the final draft, the LTF is required to provide written comments to the City. If deficiencies are indicated, the LTF is required to meet with the City to resolve them. Then a public heating, which has had at least ten day's advanced noticing in a newspaper of general circulation, is held to allow comments from the public and members of the governing body. Upon considering all comments regarding the document, the City shall, by resolution, adopt the NDFE. A copy of the resolution will be given to the MSWMA for submittal to the California Integrated Waste Management Board, along with the document and resolutions from the other participating jurisdictions. The specific state regulations for the preparation and review of the NDFE are attached (Attachment No. 3). Staff requests Council review and comment on the draft NDFE. Comments will be returned to the MSWMA for incorporation into the final draft NDFE. Mike Sweeney, the author of the NDFE and General Manager of the MSWMA, will be at the City Council meeting to answer any questions. SAG:kk R: I ~NDFILL ANONDISPOSAL.FAC Nondisposal Facility Element County of Mendocino City of Ukiah City of Fort Bragg City of Willits 1. Introduction California Public Resources Code Sections 41730 et. seq. require every California city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) for all new nondisposal facilities, and any expansions of existing nondisposal facilities, which will be needed to implement local Source Reduction & Recycling Elements (SRREs). A nondisposal facility is defined as any solid waste facility required to obtain a state solid waste facility' permit except a disposal facility or a transformation facility (PRC Section 40151). This multi-jurisdictional NDFE is prepared on behalf of the County of Mendocino and the cities of Ukiah, Fort Bragg and Willits by the Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority, a joint powers agency formed by those jurisdictions in 1990. It identifies transfer stations, recycling processing facilities, and composting facilities as facilities necessary to implement the jurisdictions' waste diversion goals. 2. Mendocino County's waste diversion strategy In the multi-jurisdictional SRRE, a strategy of soUrce separation was adopted to divert solid waste from disposal. This includes curbside recycling, commercial recycling, and drop-off recycling to allow waste generators to'separate out recyclables from trash. In order to implement this strategy, a variety of nondisposal facilities are needed. These include: · Transfer stations with extensive drop-off recycling services. NDFE - PAGE 1 · Composting facilities to process yard waste and wood waste. · Recycling processing facilities to prepare recyclables for shipment to market. 3. Transfer stations As a rural area, Mendocino County has a high proportion of self-haulers who bring their own trash to transfer stations or landfills. Extensive recycling opportunities must be provided at transfer stations. As of November, 1995, there were five small-volume transfer stations operating in Mendocino County: Albion, Caspar, Covelo, Boonville and Potter Valley. Three additional small-volume transfer stations are planned: Laytonville, Willits and South Coast. A large-vOlume transfer station is planned for Ukiah. Albion Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions The Albion Station is a small-volume transfer station using a roll-off container to receive self-haul waste, together with smaller containers for source-separated recyclables. Owned and operated by the County of Mendocino. Albion Ridge Road, Albion Receives approximately 650 tons per year of waste and 222 tons per year of recyclables. 25 percent ~of material received is recycled. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino. NDFE - PAGE 2 · Composting facilities to process yard waste and wood waste. · Recycling processing facilities to prepare recyclables for shipment to market. 3.. Transfer stations As a rural area, Mendocino County has a high proportion of self-haulers who bring their own trash to transfer stations or landfills. Extensive recycling opportunities must be provided at transfer stations. As of November, 1995, there were five small-volume transfer stations operating in Mendocino County: Albion, Caspar, Covelo, Boonville and Potter Valley. Three additional small-volume transfer stations are planned: Laytonville, Willits and South Coast. A large-vOlume transfer station is planned for Ukiah. Albion Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions The Albion Station is a small-volume transfer station using a roll-off container to receive self-haul waste, together with smaller containers for source-separated recyclables. Owned and operated by the County of Mendocino. Albion Ridge Road, Albion Receives approximately 650 tons per year of waste and 222 tons per year of recyclables. 25 percent ,of material received is recycled. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino. NDFE - PAGE 2 Covelo Transfer Statilin Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions The Covelo Transfer Station is a small-volume transfer station using a roll-off container to receive self-haul waste, together with smaller containers and buy-back for source- separated recyclables. Owned by the County of Mendocino and operated by Solid Wastes of Willits. End of Covelo Refuse Road, Covelo Receives approximately 250 tons per year of waste and 265 tons per year of recyclables. 51 percent of material received is recycled. The facility serves the unincorPorated County of Mendocino. Laytonville Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions The Laytonville Transfer Station is planned to open in 1996 as a small-volume transfer station using a rear-load containers to receive self-haul waste, and be integrated with a drop-off and buy-back recycled center. The site will be owned by the County of Mendocino and operated by Solid Wastes of Willits. Branscomb Road, Laytonville Expected to receive approximately 312 tons per year of waste and 480 tons per year of recyclables. 60 percent of material received is recycled. The facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino. NDFE - PAGE 4 Covelo Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expec. ted diversion rate Participating jurisdictions The Covelo Transfer Station is a Small-volume transfer station using a roll-off container to receive self-haul waste, together with smaller containers and buy-back for source- separated recyclables. Owned by the County of Mendocino and operated by Solid Wastes of Willits. End of Covelo Refuse Road, Covelo Receives approximately 250 tons per year of waste and 265 tons per year of rec¥clables. 51 percent, of material received is recycled. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino. Laytonville Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions The Laytonville Transfer Station is planned to open in 1996 as a small-volume transfer station using a rear-load containers to receive Self-haul waste, and be integrated with a drOp-off and buy-back recycled center. The site will be owned by the County of Mendocino and operated by Solid Wastes of Willits. Branscomb Road, Laytonville Expected to receive approximately 312 tons per year of ' waste and 480 tons per year of recyclables. 60 percent of material received is recycled. The facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino. · NDFE - PAGE 4 Ukiah Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility is planned to be a large-volume transfer station receiving both commercial hauler and self-haul waste, together with transfer loads from the small volume transfer stations. It will include a buy-back and drop-off recycling center for self-haulers. Projected opening date is 1998 or 1999. The facility will be owned by the Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority and operated by a private company, not yet determined. 3401 N. State Street, Ukiah The facility is expected to receive approximately 45,000 tons per year of waste and 2,000 tons of recyclables. 4 percent of material received is expected to be recycled, from the self-haul drop-off and buy-back service The facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino, the City of Ukiah, the City of Willits, and, possibly, the City of Fort Bragg. Willits Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility is planned to open upon the closure of the Willits landfill in mid-1997. It will receive self-haul waste in a roll-off box, and will be integrated with a drop-off and buy-back recycling center. It will be owned and operated by Solid Wastes of Willits. Undetermined. Expected to receive 1,500 tons of waste and 675 tons of recyclables. 30 percent of material received recycled. The .facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino and the City of Willits. NDFE - PAGE 6 Ukiah Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility is planned to be a large-volume transfer station receiving both commercial hauler and self-haul waste, together with transfer loads from the small volume transfer stations. It will include a buy-back and drop-off recycling center for self-haulers. Projected opening date is 1998 or 1999. The facility will be owned by the Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority and operated by a private company, not yet determined. 3401 N. State Street, Ukiah The facility is expected to receive approximately 45,000 tons per year of waste and 2,000 tons of recyclables. 4 percent of material received is expected to be recycled, from the self-haul drop-off and buy-back service The facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino, the City of Ukiah, the City of Willits, and, possibly, the City of Fort Bragg. Willits Transfer Station Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility is planned to open upon the closure of the Willits landfill in mid-1997. It will receive self-haul waste in a roll-off box, and will be integrated with a drop-off and buy-back recycling center. It will be owned and operated by Solid Wastes of Willits. Undetermined. Expected to receive 1,500 tons of waste and 675 tons of recyclables. 30 percent of material received recycled. The .facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino and the City of Willits. NDFE - PAGE 6 Reuser, Inc. Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility receives yard waste and wood waste, which it. uses for composting, mulch, boiler fuel, and fiber board ~roduction. 370 Santana Drive, Cloverdale The facility reports receiving 2,000 tons of municipal wood waste and yard waste from Mendocino County. This is a small portion of the facility's overall production. Not available. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino and the City of Ukiah. Grab & Grow Soil Products Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility was used by Empire Waste Management as destination for yard waste collected at its drop-off facility in Fort Bragg in 1995. The material was composted. 2759 Llano Road, Santa Rosa Material sent to the facility from Mendocino County is believed to be less than 15 tons per month. This is a small :)ortion of the facility's overall capacity. Not available. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino and the City of Fort Bragg. 6. Recycling Processing Facilities Recycling Processing F~.cilities (sometimes referred to as materials recovery facilities or MRFs) are an essential part of Mendocino County's recycling strategy. Large quantities of recyclables collected in curbside and commercial pickup need to be further sorted, cleaned and baled prior to shipment to market. These activities are conducted at recycling processing facilities. NDFE - PAGE 8 Reuser, Inc. Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility receives yard waste and wood waste, whiCh it. uses for composting, mulch, boiler fuel, and fiber board :)roduction. 370 Santana Drive, Cloverdale The facility reports receiving 2,000 tons of municipal wood waste and yard waste from Mendocino County. This is a small portion of the facil!ty's overall production. Not available. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino and the City of Ukiah. Type of Facility Grab & Grow Soil Products ,, . This facility was used by Empire Waste Management as destination for yard waste collected at its drop-off facility in Fort Bragg in 1995. The material was composted. Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions 2759 Llano Road, Santa Rosa Material sent to the facility from Mendocino County is believed to be less than 15 tons per month. This is a small :)ortion of the facility's overall ,capacity. Not available. The facility serves the unincorporated County of. Mendocino and the City of Fort Bragg. 6. Recycling Processing Facilities Recycling Processing F~.cilities (sometimes referred to as materials recovery facilities or MRFs) are an essential part of Mendocino County's recycling strategy. Large quantities of recyclables collected in curbside and commercial pickup need to be further sorted, cleaned and baled prior to shipment to market. These activities are conducted at recycling processing facilities. NDFE- PAGE 8 Novato Disposal Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdiction., Service This facility has a sorting line and baler. Recyclables are processed and shipped to market. 2543 Petaluma Boulevard South, Petaluma Not available. Not available. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino, the City of Ukiah, and the City of Willits. Solid Waste Systems Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions ~ , This facility is planned to be recycling processing facility with a sorting line and baler. The Ukiah hauler has announced plans for construction at its existing truck yard. 3151 Taylor Drive, Ukiah Not available. Not available. The facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino, the City of Ukiah, and the City of Willits. NDFE - PAGE 10 Novato Disposal Service Type of Facility Location Facility capacity Expected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility has a sorting line and baler. Recyclables are processed and shipped to market. 2543 Petaluma Boulevard South, Petaluma Not available. Not available. The facility serves the unincorporated County of Mendocino, the City of Ukiah, and the City of Willits. Solid Waste Systems Type of Facility Location Facility capacity ExPected diversion rate Participating jurisdictions This facility is planned to be recycling processing facility with a sorting tine and baler. The Ukiah hauler has announced plans for construction at its existing truck yard. 3151 Taylor Drive, Ukiah Not available. Not available. The facility will serve the unincorporated County of Mendocino, the City of Ukiah, and the City of Willits. NDFE - PAGE 10 Dac. 01 i995 ll:ISAM Me~oci~ Solid Waste Lo~al Task Fo~ MINUTES Thursday, November 16, 1~5 at Brooktrails Community Center 1. Meeting was called to'order at 7:14 p.m. The following members were present: Jerry Ward, Tony Orth, Roy Steffen, Paul Caylep, Dave Beebe, Chair Phil Bmhnei*der, Bob Alturas, Sue Ooodrick. Others present: Mike Sweeney, Bruce McCracken, Karen Bridley. 2. No additions to the agenda were requested. 3. Approval of Minutes. Chair requested that copies of all minutes be mailed to each member prior to the next meeting for consideration and action. 4. Chair opened the LTF review of Willits Solid Waste's permit application for composting operations at Eastside Road Talmage~ as required by Public Resource~ Code 50000. Jerry Ward gave a presentation of the existing operation and described why the State Board now requires LTF review of s~all composting facilities and their permitin~. Loeati~ is on the Sagehorn Ranch east of Talma§e and is limited to 1,000 tons per year, with no more than 1,500 yards on site at any ti~e. No negative comments have been received ~o date in the permit process. LTF members commented that this type of operation would be a ~ood ~odel to use in o~her areas such as the coast and rural areas. Al~uras motion, Steffen ~nd, "Willits Solid Waste's composting opera, ion is consistant with ~o~posting goals in the County SRRE and the Mendocino LTF recommends Talmage site permit approval". All ayes (Ward abstain), motion passed. 5. M.S.W.M.A. staff Mike Sweeney submitted the "Report to Mendocino County on Diversion of Solid Waste from Disposal" for LTF review and comment. Mike gave a full review of the contents of the report. It ~ontains the Non-Disposal Element recently required by the Bta~e Board. LTF members discussed both existing transfer station operations and proposed new transfer station locations and additional services contained in the report. The ability to take up to 15 yards of solid wastes without a full solid waste permit at the transfer stations was commented on as to its benefit to the general public and to ~he haulers. Locating sm-vices on the coast and in rural area~ such as a co,posting operation and a SoUth Coast transfer statio~ were discussed as well. A $3 pep 30-gallon can versus the $15 minumum 1-yard charge was discussed relative to helping prevent illegal dumping when combined with accepting small a~ounts of solid waste at the ~ransfep stations. It was pointed out that the County is able to offer sevi~e~ faster via public/private partnerships in a cost-effective way. The haulers present hoped the County ~ould operate at least one major facility to protec~ the small haulers from lack of local control. Comment ~as ~ade tha~ a~y item not put in this report would have to be added via its o~n review an~ comment process at that future time. Motion by Steffen, ~nd by Beebe: "Bend report to local juristictions for review a~d co~ent by January 18th ~eetin§, with final action by the LTF to adopt and sub, it by Febuary meeting." All ayes, motion passed. 6. LTF members reviewed the listed recommendations in the M.S.W.M.A. report, already adopted by the JPA board. In past meetings it h~d been decided to have M.S.W.M.A. staff prepare and submit these recommendations after extensive research for LTF final comments. The list of ~eeommendations allow for continued data ~ollection to help each responsible agent and agencie~ track AB 9~9 ~ompliance and recognizes our s~ggestions from past ~eetings. LTF ~e~ber~s FROM ' NCD SAT PHONE NO. ' 707 459 3164 D~c. 0i 1995 ll'16AM P3 comments continued to stress the importance of the items in the listing and the need to act with the political will to carry them through to implementation. Motion by Cayler, 2nd by Alturas: ' Send out for comment and review to local jurimictions and notify LTF Chairman of ~ate to be plaeed on a~enda over the next 90 days." All ayes~ motion passed. 7. Chair requested action to remove non-active members. Motion by Steffen, ~nd by Beebe: "Remove Donna Woods." All ~yes, motion passed. Motion by Alt~pas, ~d by Steffen: "Remove Mike Salamone.' All ayes, motions ~aepied~ Chair will ~otify County of openings. 8. Public ~omments. Bruce MaCra~ken reported on Ukiah ~olid Waste's recycling processing facility, which he hopes ~ill be ready ne~t year. Said parent company "Rato" is family owned, includin~ 16 operations with the main office in Santa Rosa, 9. Bob Alturas wants illegal eoad-side dumping on ou~ next agenda. 10. Motion made to adjourn at 9:38. Respectful ly submitted, Tony Orth, Secretary Mendocino Solid Waste Local Tamk Force § 18'757.7 BARCLAYS CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS ~ r';x'~ ~ ~,~ ~e~,V · Title 14 (5) f'mal destination of collected wastes (e.g., landfill, transformation, exportation), by quantity (tons and cubic yards). (b) The Summary Plan shall identify all permitted solid waste facilities located countywide or regionwide. This description shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: (1) Facility name and location; and (2) A map showing existing permitted solid waste facilities county- wide or regionwide. The map should be drawn to scale and the scale and legend included on the map sheet. The map may be a 7.5 or 15 minute USGS quadrangle. (c) The Summary Plan may include a description of waste diversion facilities located countywide or regionwide that are exempt or have re- ceived an exclusion from a solid waste facilities permit to the extent practicable. For each facility this description should include: (1) the reason for exemption or exclusion; (2) the estimated amount and type of material recovered/processed; and, (3) the operator(s) and owner(s). (d) The Summary Plan shah include, for countywide or regionwide programs, a description of Recycling Market Development Zones, and applicable strategies for processing and/or marketing secondary materi- als, including forming regional secondary materials marketing associ- ations and joining associations outside the jurisdictional boundaries. The description shah discuss the county's or regional agency's role in devel- oping markets. NOT~: Aulhority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tion 41751, Public Resources Code. HISTORY 1. New section filed 7-12-94; operative 8-11-94 (Register 94, No. 28). § 18757.7. Summary of Source Reduction and Recycling Elements, Household Hazardous Waste Elements and Nondisposal Facility Elements. The Summary Plan shall: (a) Summarize the types of programs planned in the Source Reduction and Recycling Elements by component from all the jurisdictions. This summary shall include, but is not limited to, the following: (I) a listing and descriplion of the planned and current diversion pro- grams; (2) a listing and identification of all planned contingency programs and measures; and (3) a listing of targeted materials and marketing strategies, by pro- (b) Summarize the types of programs planned in the Household Haz- ardous Waste Elements from all jurisdictions. This summary shah in- clude, but is not limited to, the following: (1) a listing and identification of aH planned and contingency programs and measures; and (2) a listing of targeted materials and marketing strategies, by pro- gram. (c) List the types and numbers of facilities planned in the Nondisposal Facility Elements from all jurisdictions and identify which jurisdictions are served by or use the facility(les). (d) Describe the coordination or consolidation of programs identified in subdivisions (a) and (b) of this section to include the following: (1) identification and description of programs that were coordinated or consolidated and those programs that may be coordinated or consoli- dated in the future into countrywide or regionwide programs; and (A) implementation schedules for the coordinalion or consolidation of individual jurisdiction's programs into countywide or regionwide pro- grams. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tion 41751, Public Resources Code. HISTORY 1. New section filed 7-12-94; operative 8-11-94 (Register 94, No. 28). § 18758. Countywide and Regional Agency Integrated Waste Management Plan Financing. The Summary Plan shall: (a) Provide cost estimations for the countywide or regionwide pro- grams and facilities scheduled for implementation and use. (b) Summarize funding sources and allocation of revenues for aH pro- gram and facility planning and implementation tasks identified in the Summary Plan. NoG Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: See- tion 4175 l, Public Resources Code. H~STO~¥ 1. New section filed 7-12-94; operative 8-11-94 (Register 94, No. 28). Article 7. Procedures for Preparing and Revising City, Regional Agency and County Source Reduction and Recycling Elements, and Household Hazardous Waste Elements and City and County Nondisposal Facility Elements § 18760. Applicability. (a) The procedures for preparing Source Reduction and Recycling Ele- ments (SRREs), Household Hazardous Waste Elements (HHWEs) and Nondisposal Facility Elements (NDFEs) apply to the counties, cities, joint power authorities, regional agencies, special districts, or other agen- cies which are designated by the cities or counties, and axe responsible for preparing these Elements. (1) Cities, counties and cities which are also counties may enter into agreements to prepare and implement the SRREs, HHWES and NDFEs which are specific to each jurisdiction. (2) A city, county or a city and county shall be held accountable for im- plementation of the specified goals and programs of its SRRE and HHWE. (b) For the purposes of this article, a jurisdiction is a city, county, city and county or regional agency. Now: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tions 40002, 40950, 40971 through 40975, 41000, 41300, 41500, 41510, 41730, 41731, 41813, 41850 and 41823, Public Resources Code. ~sxoav 1. New section filed 3-19-90 as an emergency; operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. 2. New section refiled 7--6-90 as an emergency; operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by I 1-14-90 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due date in HISTORY 2 (Regis- ter 91, No. 13). 4. Request for readoption of 7-6-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL 11-6-90 but never filed wilh Secretary of State. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-91 as an emergencjr, operative 2-15-91 (Register 91, No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-15-91 order, including amendment of sub- section (a)(l), Iransmitted to OAL 4-29-91 and filed 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Amendment of article heading filed 4-30-92; operative 4-30-92 pursuant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19). 8. Amendment of article heading, section and No~ filed 1-3-94 as an emergen- cy; operative 1-3-94 (Register 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 9. Editorial correction adding HISTORY 8 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). § 18761. Local Task Force (LTF). (a) Establishment. Each county board of sutx.~rvisors and a majority of the cities within the county which contain a majority of the population in [The next page is 806.143.] Page 806.1420) Regiat~ 94, No. 48; 12-2-94 Title 14 California Integrated Waste Management Board § 18763 the county, shall submit written documentation to the Board approving the membership of their LTF, within 30 days after establishment of the LTF. (1) The documentation submitted to the Board shall denote the identity of the members in the LTF, and whether the members represent the gov- ernmental or the private sectors, or other entities or groups. The docu- mentation shall define the terms of membership for each member. (2) The terms of membership shall be determined by the county board of supervisors and a majority of the cities within the county which contain a majority of the population in the county. (3) After its establishment, each LTF shall inform the Board of how frequently it intends to meet. CO) Role of the LTF.~Ilm~.-~~~ ' fer ~1~ ~'r-n~L~TF~lliall:~ amt~i~ia~tev~w ~ SRRE, HHWE SRRE, ItlIWE andl~tDFE. during preparation of the SRRE, HHWE and NDe. Such informaiion may be presented to the general public at public hearings and upon re- quest by members of local government and community organizations. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- lions 40001, 40950, 41000, 41300, 41500, 41510, 41730 and 41731, Public Re- sources Code. 1. New section filed 3-19-90 as an emergenc~,: operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitled to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. 2. New section retided 7-6-90 as an emergenc~, operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A C~rlificate of Compliance must be tranm~itled to OAL by 11-14-90 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due date in HIstoRY 2 (Regis- ter 91, No. 13). 4. Request for readoplion of 7-6-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL ! 1-6-90 but never filed with Secret~'y of State. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-9 ! as an emergency: operative 2-15-91 (Register 91, No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance musl be transmiUed to OAL by 6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Cerlificale of Compliance as to 2-15-91 order, including amendment of sub- section Co), Iranm~iU~41 to OAL 4-29-91 and filed 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Amendment of subsections Co)-CO)(2) tided I-3-94 as an emergency: operative 1-3-94 (Register 94, No. 45). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmiUed to OAL by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 8. Edilorial oorreclion adding Hls~o,¥ 7 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). § 18762. Element Preparation. (a) A jurisdiction shah prepare the initial SRRE, HHWE and NDFE pursuant to Articles 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 of this chapter, as applicable. (1) Except as provided by Public Resources Code section 41735(a), a jurisdiction shah comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq. Co) A jurisdiction shall submit written documentation to the Board of ic~ designation of an agency responsible for preparation of the SRRE, i[llWE and NDFE wilhin 30 days of said designation. (c) A jurisdiction, in coordination with the LTF, shall prepare and adopt the SRRE, HHWE and NDFE, by the dates specified in Public Re- sources Code sections 41000, 41300 and 41791, as applicable. (d) For the purposes of this article, after a jurisdiction prepares its NDFE it shall be appended to the SRRE by the jurisdiction at the time the SRRE is submitted to the Board. At the time of the five year revision of the SRRE, the NDFE shall be incorporated into the SRRE. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tions 21083, 40900, 40950, 41000, 41003, 41300, 41303, 41500, 41510, 41730, 41731,41732, 41733, 41734, 41735, 41736, 41750, 41780 and 41791, Public Re- sources Code. l-hsmRv 1. New section filed 3-19-90 as an emergency; operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. 2. New section refiled 7-6-90 as an emergency;, operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 11-14-90 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due dale in I-~STO~Y 2 (Regis- · ter 91, No. 13). 4; Request for readoplion of 7-6-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL 11-6-90 but never tided with Secretary ors tale. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-91 as an emergency;, operative 2-15-91 (Register 91, No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance mu st be transmi tied to OAL by 6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-15-91 order transmitted to OAL 4-29-91 and filed 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Change without regulatory effect amending section heading and subsection , (a)(l) filed 7-11-91 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regula- tions (Register 92, No. 12). 8. Amendment of section heading and text filed 4-30-92: operative 4-30-92 pur- suant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19). 9. Amendment of section heading, text and NOTE filed 1-3-94 as an emergency; operative I-3-94 (Register 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by op- eration of law on the following day. 10. Editorial correction adding FhsTo~v 9 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). § 18763. Circulation of a Preliminary Draft 8RR and HHW Elements for Review. (a) A jurisdiction shall prepare a preliminary draft of its SRRE and HHWE. Co) If the jurisdiction is a city, the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE shall be sent to adjoining cities, the county or regional agency responsible for the Countywide or Regional Agency Integrated Waste Management Plan preparation and the LTF. (c) ff the jurisdiction is a county, the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE shall be sent to adjoining cities and the LTF. (d) If the jurisdiction is a regional agency then the following applies: (1) If the regional agency is composed of a single county but does not include all of the cities within the county the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE shah be sent to adjoining cities, th e agency in the county responsi- ble for the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan preparation and to the LTF. (2) If the regional agency is composed ora single county and all of the cities within that county the preliminary draft SRR and HHW Element shall be sent to adjoining cities and the LTF. (3) If the regional agency is composed of two or more counties and all of the cities within the counties, the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE shall be sent to adjoining cities, and the LTF of each affected county. (4) If the regional agency is composed of two or more counties but does not include all of the cities within those counties, the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE shah be sent to adjoining cities, each of the county agencies responsible for the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans and the LTF of each affected county. Each jurisdiction shall also submit three copies of the draft SRRE and HttWE to the Board. No,F_. Authority cited: Section 40502. Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tions 40900, 41000, 41300, 41500, 41510. 4 ! 750. ! and 41790, Public Resources Code. I-hsm,¥ 1. New section filed 3-19-90 as an emergency; operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be lransmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. Page 806.143 Registe~ 95, Nos. 19-20;. 5-19--95 § 18,764 BARCLAYS CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS Title 14 2. New section refiled 7-6-90 as an emergency; operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAt, by 11-14--90 or emergency hnguage will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due date in HISTORY 2 (Regis- ter 91, No. 13). 4. Request for re, adoption of 7-6-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL 11-6-90 but never filed with Secretary of State. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-91 as an emergency; operative 2-15-91 (Register 91, No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-19-91 order, including amendment of first paragraph, transmitted to OAL 4-29-91 and filed 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Amendment of section heading and text filed 4-30-92; operative 4-30-92 pur- suant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19). 8. Amendment of section and NOTE filed 1-3-94 as an emergency; operative 1-3-94 (Register 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 9. Editorial correction adding HISTORY 8 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). to OAL by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repe~led by operation of law on the following day. 10. Editorial correction adding HISTORY 9 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). § 18765. ~ Final Draft 8RRE, HHWE and (a) Thirty (~) days Prior to the public hearing for the adoption of the SRRE and HHWE, the jurisdiction shall send a copy of the f'mal draft of its SRRE and HHWE to the LTF(s) of the affected counties for review. Within 15 days of receipt of the final draft of the SRRE and HHWE, the LTF shall provide written comments to the jurisdiction and the Board re- garding the final draft. § 18764. Review of the Preliminary Draft SRR and HHW Elements. (a) Review Period. In accordance with Government Code section 15376, the review period shall be a minimum of 30 days, commencing upon the date of receipt of the Preliminary Draft SRRE and HHWE by a reviewing agency. The median time for review shall be 38 days. The maximum time for review shah be 45 days. (1) Review by LTF. In reviewing the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE, the LTF shall consider the issues of regional concern pursuant to Public Resources Code section 40950(c) to aid in ensuring that they are addressed. Copies of written comments made by the LTF on the pre- liminary draft SRRE and HHWE shall be sent simultaneously to the Board and to the jurisdiction that prepared the Preliminary draft SRRE and ttHWE. (2) Review by Other Reviewing Agencies. The county, adjacent cities, any association of regional governments and the Board shall review the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE and send written comments to the jurisdiction that Prepared the Preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE. A copy of the Board's written comments shall be sent simultaneously to the LTF. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code; Section 15376, Government Code. Reference: Sections 40950, 41000, 41300, 41500, 41510 and 41790, Public Resources Code. H~sTORY 1. New section filed 3-19-90 as an emergency; operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. 2. New section ret'fled 7-6-90 as an emergency; operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to O AL by 11-1 4-90 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due date in HISTORY 2 (Regis- ter 91, No. 13). 4. Request for readoption of 7-6-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL 11-6-90 but never filed with Secretary of State. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-91 as an emergency; operative 2-15-91 (Register 9 I, No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-15-91 order, including amendment of sub- section (a), transmitted to OAL 4-29-91 and filed 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Change without regulatory effect amending subsection (a) filed 7-11-91 pur- suant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 92, No. 12). 8. Amendment of section heading and text filed 4-30-92; operative 4-30-92 pur- suant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19). 9. ,A~ e,,n,dm~ent.of section and NOTE f'ded 1-3-94 as an emergency; operative ~-.~-~,4 tKeglster 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be Iransmitted 0fli~ rNDI~. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tions 40950, 40971,41000, 41300, 41500, 41510, 41730, 41731 and 41734, Pub- lic Resources Code. }UrrORy 1. New section filed 3-19-90 as an emergency: operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. 2. New section re filed 7-6-90 as an emergency; operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 11-14-90 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due date in HISTORY 2 (Regis- ter 91, No. 13). 4. Request for readoption of 7-6-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL 11-6-90 but never filed with Secretary of State. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-91 as an emergency;, operative 2-15-91 (Register 9 I, No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-15-91 order, including amendment of sub- section (a), transmitted to OAL 4-29-91 and filed 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Amendment of~ection heading and text filed 4-30-92: operative 4-30-92 pur- suant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19). 8. Amen..dment of section heading, text and NOTE f'ded 1-3-94 as an emergency; operauve 1-3-94 (Register 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by op- eration of law on the following day. 9. Editorial correction adding HIsTOI~Y 8 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). § ~;! :~~tion; Notioe; Looal Adoption of SRRE, HHWE al~ ~ (a) The general public, affected governmental entities, and private in- f the SR,~,HHWE .and ND~ (1) Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 41793, at least one pub- lic hearing shall be held to receive testimony regarding the Preliminary Draft of the SRRE and HHWE before a jurisdiction adopts its SRRE and HHWE. (A) To inform the public of the hearing, the jurisdiction shah publish a notice in a local newspaper of general circulation at least 30 days in ad- vance of the scheduled public hearing on the SRRE and HHWE. (2) Jurisdictions may form advisory committees which may review and comment on draft elements, and provide technical guidance and sup- port during the development of the SRRE, HHWE and NDFE. (b) In addition to the hearing or hearings held pursuant to (a)(l) of this section, the governing body of the jurisdiction, slmii-~smi,~ a publb. Page 806.144 Register 95, Nos. 19--20;. 5-19-.95 Title 14 California Integrated Waste Management Board § 18768 ~~~~~e SRRE, HHWE and NDFE. After ~~['~.~:~~f the governing body and the ~,~~mei~~ aao~e SRO, HUW~ and vance of the scheduled public hearing on the Final draft SRRE, HHWE NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tions 40900, 40971, 41000, 41300, 41500, 4151 O, 41730, 41731 and 41793, Pub- lic Resources Code. H~sxoev 1. New section fried 3-19-90 as an emergency; operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. 2. New section refiled 7-6-90 as an emergency;, operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 11-14-90 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due date in HISTORY 2 (Regis- ter 91, No. 13). 4. Request for readoption of 7-6-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL 11-6-90 but never filed with Secretary of State. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-91 as an emergency; operative 2-15-91 (Register 91, No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-15-91 order, including amendment of sub- section (a)(l), transmitted to OAL 4-29-91 and filed 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Change without reguhtory effect amending subsection (a)(2) filed 7-11-91 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 92, No. 12). 8. Amendment of section heading and text filed 4-30-92; operative 4-30-92 pur- suant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19). 9. Amendment of section heading, text and NOTE filed 1-3-94 as an emergency; operative 1-3-94 (Register 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by !-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by op- eration of law on the following day. 10. Editorial correction adding HISTORY 9 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). 11. Editorial correction of subsection (b) (Register 95, No. 19). § 18766.5. Revision of the 8RRE prior to Board Approval. (a) Nothing in this chapter shall require the jurisdiction to revise the SRRE prior to submittal to the Board for review. (b) ifa jurisdiction revises its SRRE prior to its submittal to the Board, or a jurisdiction revises its SRRE in response to Board disapproval or conditional approval of the SRRE, then the following applies: (1) The revised or corrected SRRE shah be adopted, by resolution, at a public hearing. (2) To inform the public of the hearing, the jurisdiction shah publish a notice in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days in ad- vance of the scheduled public hearing on the revised or corrected SRRE. (3) Thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing for the adoption of the revised SRRE, the jurisdiction shall send a copy of the final draft of its revised SRRE to the LTF(s) of the affected counties for review. Within 15 days of receipt of the revised SRRE, the LTF shall provide written comments to the jurisdiction and the Board regarding the revised SRRE. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code; and Section 15376, Government Code. Reference: Sections 40950, 41000, 41300, 41781.2, 41790 and 41793, Public Resources Code. thSTORY 1. New section filed 1-3-94 as an emergency; operative 1-3-94 (Register 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be Iransmitted to OAt, by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 2. Editorial correction adding section and HISTORY 1 (Register 94, No. 48). § 18767. 8ubmlttal of City or Regional Agency SRREs and HHWEs and City NDFEe to County and County NDFEs to the Cities. (a) A city or regional agency which is composed of some cities within a single county shah transmit one (1) copy of its SRRE and three (3) co- pies of its HHWE to the county in which it is located for incorporation into the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (Plan), within 30 days of its adoption by the city or regional agency. (1) A signed resolution and documentation that the jurisdiction has complied with CEQA (Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq.) shall accompany the SRRE and HHWE that are submitted to the county. (b) A city, unless it is a city and county, shah transmit a copy of its NDFE to the County or Regional Agency in which it is located for incor- poration into the Countywide or Regional Agency Integrated Waste Management Plan, within 30 days of its adoption by the city. This submit- tal shall occur no later than the applicable submittal dates in PRC section 41791.5. (c) A county, unless it is a city and county, shall transmit a copy of its NDFE to the cities which are located within the county within 30 days of its adoption by the county. This submittal shah occur no later than the applicable submittal dates specified in PRC 41791.5. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sec- tions 21083, 40971,41000, 41300, 41500, 41510, 41791,41730, 41731,41750.1 and 41793, Public Resources Code. H~s~oRY 1. New section filed 3-19-90 as an emergency: operative 3-19-90 (Register 90, No. 14). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 7-17-90. 2. New section refiled 7-6-90 as an emergency;, operative 7-17-90 (Register 90, No. 37). A Ce~cate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 1 I-14-90 or emergency umguage will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 3. Editorial correction of Certificate of Compliance due date in HISTORY 2 (Regis- ter 91, No. 13). 4. Request for readoption of 7~-90 emergency regulations approved by OAL 11-6-90 but never fried with Secretary of State. Section repealed by operation of Government Code section 11346.1(e) (Register 91, No. 13). 5. New section refiled 2-15-91 as an emergency;, operative 2-15-91 (Register 91. No. 13). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by6-17-91 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-15-91 order, including amendment of sub- section (a), transmitted to OAL 4-29-91 and fried 5-29-91 (Register 91, No. 37). 7. Change without regulatory effect amending subsection (a) and renumbering (a)(1) to (b) filed 7-11-91 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 92, No. 12). 8. Amendment of section heading and text filed 4-30-92; operative 4-30-92 pur- suant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19). 9. Amendment of section heading, text and NoTE filed 1-3-94 as an emergency; operative 1-3-94 (Register 94, No. 48). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 1-3-97 or emergency language will be repealed by op- eration of law on the following day. 10. Editorial correction adding HISTORY 9 and changes noted therein (Register 94, No. 48). § 18768. Submittal of SRREs, HHWEs and NDFEs and Amendments to NDFEs to the Board. (a) A jurisdiction shall, according to the schedule set forth in PRC sec- tion 41791.5, submit to the Board three (3) copies of its SRRE. (1) When submitting the SRRE to the Board, the jurisdiction shah in- clude a copy of the public notice(s) for the public hearings on the SRRE, a copy of the resolution(s) adopting the SRRE, comments on the final draft from the LTF, and a copy of the Notice of Determination which has been filed with the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Re- search as verification of compliance with the CEQA (Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq.). (b) A city or county, or city and county, sh all, according to the schedule set forth in PRC section 41791.5, submit to the Board three copies of its (1) When submitting the NDFE or amendment to the NDFE to the Board, the city or county shaU include a copy of the public notice(s) for Page 806.145 Regret 95, Nos. 19-20:, 5--19-95 ITEM NO. 10b DATE: December 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ELECTING CALPERS HEALTH PLANS FOR THE MANAGEMENT UNIT Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding for the Management Unit approved at your last meeting, the CalPers Health Plans will be made available to Unit members, effective January 1, 1996. We are required to have an original resolution of the City Council provided to CalPers prior to December 10, in order to enroll in the CalPers Health Plans with an effective date of January 1. The CalPers Health Plans are also known as the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act or PEMHCA. A resolution is attached for your review and consideration. In addition to electing CalPers Health Plans for members of the Management Unit, the resolution also establishes the employer rates for employees and retirees. We have restructured the Management Unit's flex plan in order to have the least financial impact on the City. The employer rate for employees will be the minimum allowed by CalPers which is $16.00 per month. The employer rate for retirees will be $1.00 per month, with an annual increase of 5% of the active employee rate per year. Therefore, the monthly employer rate for retirees would increase 80¢ per year until the rate reaches $16.00. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution in order to provide the CalPers Health Plans to the Management Unit, effective January 1, 1996, pursuant to the approved Memorandum of Understanding. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adoption of resolution. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Do Not Adopt Resolution. 2. Refer to Staff for further information. Appropriation Requested- N/A Citizen Advised' N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Kari Revheim, Acting Personnel Officer Coordinated with- Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: Resolution. 3: PER\ASR. PERS ~ - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ELECTING TO BE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT ONLY WITH RESPECT TO MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT UNIT AND FIXING THE EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION FOR EMPLOYEES AND THE EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION FOR ANNUITANTS AT DIFFERENT AMOUNTS WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22850.3 provides that a contracting agency may elect upon proper application to participate under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act with respect to a recognized employee organization only; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22857 provides that a contracting agency may fix the amount of the employer's contribution for employees and the employer's contribution for annuitants at different amounts provided that the monthly contribution for annuitants shall be annually increased by an amount not less than 5 percent of the monthly contribution for employees, until such time as the amounts are equal; and WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, is a local agency contracting with the Public Employees' Retirement System; and WHEREAS, the Public Agency desires to obtain for the members of the Management Unit who are employees and annuitants of the agency, the benefit of the Act and to accept the liabilities and obligations of an employer under the Act and Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Public Agency elects to be subject to the provisions of the Act; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the employer's contribution for each employee shall be $16.00 per month; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the employer's contribution for each annuitant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7~ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall be $1.00 per month; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the employer's contribution for each annuitant shall be increased annually by 5 percent of the monthly contribution for employees, until such time as the contributions are equal; and that the contributions for employees and annuitants shall be in addition to those amounts contributed by the Public Agency for administrative fees and to the Contingency Reserve Fund; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council appoints and directs the City Manager to file with the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System a verified copy of this Resolution, and to perform on behalf of said Public Agency all functions required of it under the Act and Regulations of the Board of Administration; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that coverage under the Act be effective on January 1, 1996. PASSED AND ADOPTED this following roll call vote: AYES' NOES' ABSENT: 6th day of December , 1995, by the ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Fred Schneiter Mayor City Clerk B:I/RESI PERS AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO._ 10c DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1995 REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF LOAN TO FORD STREET PROJECT FOR PURCHASES OF GRANT FUNDED COMPUTERS AND AUTHORIZATION OF BUDGET AMENDMENT The Ford Street Project has requested a loan of $18,500 to assist in implementing the Supportive Housing Program (SHP). Specifically, the funds would be utilized for computers and training to expeditiously begin the project. All of the monies would be repaid by June 30, 1996, with $10,500 received in February, 1996. Repayments are to be made from the federal grant awarded to the County and Ford Street for this project. Though the award has been made, the disbursement system will not be in place in a timely manner to meet a quick commencement of the program. The Fund from which the loan would be made is #335, "Community Development Commission". This fund currently has a positive fund balance, with no liabilities, of approximately $99,000. Revenue to the fund is the repayment of housing rehabilitation loans for Iow and moderate income persons. The loans were originally created through a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) administered for the City by the Mendocino County Community Development Commission. Because of the original source, i.e. CDBG, any reuse must be related to Iow and moderate income persons. Previous use of the fund was a loan to the Ukiah Community Center. Loans, rather than one time, non-replacement expenditures, allow the fund to be available for emer eg.~Q.~y_ or short term financial situations. (Continued on Pa e_,,g.~ RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve $18,500 loan from Fund 335 "Community Development Commission" to the Ford Street Project for purchase of grant funded computers, with repayment completed by June 30, 1996. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Determine loan repayment or interest schedules must be modified, identify desired changes, and approve revised loan. 2. Determine loan is not a~_gpriate and do not approve loan. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.' NA Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised: Mark Rohloff, Executive Director of The Ford Street Project Requested by: The Ford Street Project Prepared by: Michael F. Harris, AICP, Assistant to the City Manager ~~~)~ Coordinated with: Gordon Elton, Director of Finance and Candace Horsley, City Manager. Attachments: 1. November 14, 1995 loan request letter from The Ford Street Project, page 1. 2. Fund 335 Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1995, page 2. 3. Excepted budget illustratin~et amendment,__p__.~.e 3. Cane'S'ce Ho~sley, C~ty~anager FORD STREET PROJECT LOAN AND BUDGET AMENDMENT DECEMBER 6, 1995 PAGE 2 The Budget Amendment is proposed to document both the loan expenditures and the repayment with interest even though the transaction will have almost a zero net affect. Expenditures will be increased by $18,500 with revenue increased by $18,681. Since this is a Special Revenue Fund, no detail is budgeted. The amendment will be registered on page 3 of the adopted budget. Staff believes the requested loan is legitimate and that this source is very appropriate. The funds will be utilized to benefit Iow and moderate income persons and will be repaid within this fiscal year. The proposal is to loan $10,500 at zero interest in light of the two month payback, while the remaining $8,000 will carry a 6% annual interest rate with no early repayment penalty. Staff recommends the City Council approve the loan. mfh:asrcc fsploan 12695 · I Serving Mendocino County Since 1973 Novembe'~ '4.,, ~'2~c,5 . cc,{~t ci' cf-esE ~;",_'"; ~ -'~ ',ese ccc, ts- n our' pn:::,3¢,-t¢C_ ..... i99q--6, budget, an(~ we ?.new that a,-c, pr-,c',;~r~-,s~le:. $IC 500 of t:ner:~ wou~]d be p~cked up :-, r :_~ ~"' ~ e l-i c y' o i: p. '._~ ~ 2: h'i ~ s "; ;-'~ {} ~- h e c c ;Ii p _; t e ?' necessary staff ~ra:nln$ so that t~ - , -funded ¢"~' 'eot ~ , ,~e Tederai ]')' . o~,r proj Street Xs a sub--9;-antee or th.e Mendoc acc:al 'S e ;- ',' ' ~es ar, d ~ ess star~na costs ss s~bject s,~ de ~ays beyond our cont:,-c re r'e p& do not know the present cispos;tion o? the City of Uk:alq spect to interest, but ever, now I cain 9 i ve you a re ! i ab I e imOursement schedule: Fcic: Stree~ F'ro3ect car, repay $10,500 c,f e loan within two months of receipt of the $~8,500, with the iance 3~ $~,":30 pa d of* - ~, . ~ r: monthly :nsta; ~mento not ex.end St I appr'ec '; ate ),our ,co'~s-:me:--at-.cn of tn-is request and hope ~ hat .:~nc ~na~ ::,dc t, ;,::;ha] seeps ~e need to take. Administrative Offices Ford Street Guest House 139 Ford Street · Ukiah, California 95482 · (707) 462-1934 -- EMERGENCY SHELTER FIRST OFFENSE DUI PROGRAM MENDOCINO HOMELESS PROGRAM FAMILY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING OUTPATIENT DRUG & Al COHOL SERVICES FORD STREET CHILDREN'S HOUSE ,I a~ o : Z Z - · ~ I I,=. 0 I o.. <,J I uJ I c3 I I u,,I ~ I i.J ~'l I Z m I .,~ I,,,.. I Z~4'~ I m I ~ 00 ! · ~!~ I I ~-,me I I ~' I I ~ I I m LL t ~ I o . . l 000000 iO0 · · Z I J ! o.0 a~,4~O oo o .,t' .1" oo~00 ~' ~. - ' 000~0000 000~0~00 o o d:~ o d;d o - 0~0~0000 I Z oomooo, oo t Z Z I,...t I,-.I '1 ITEM NO. 10d DATE: December 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: DISCUSSION REGARDING COMPENSATION OF CITY MANAGER This matter has been placed on the agenda due to the relationship of the City Manager's compensation to that of the Department Heads'. If the Department Head Memorandum of Understanding is ratified, this agenda item would provide the opportunity for the City Council to adjust the City Manager's salary respectively should they desire to do so. It is recommended that Council review and discuss the matter of compensation for the City Manager in Closed Session and take any action deemed appropriate in open public session. RECOMMENDED ACTION- Review and take necessary action regarding compensation of City Manager ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Do Not review compensation. 2. Refer to Staff for additional information. Appropriation Requested- N/A Citizen Advised- N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Michael Harris, Assistant to the City Manager Coordinated with- Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: None. APPROVED: 3: PER\ASR. CM Assistant~ to the City Manager ITEM NO. 10e DATE: December 6, 1995 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR DEPARTMENT HEAD UNIT A tentative agreement has been reached between the Employee/Employer Relations Officer and the Department Head Unit for the 1995-96 Memorandum of Understanding. It is recommended that Council review and discuss the Memorandum of Understanding in Closed Session. If the City Council approves the agreement in closed session, then adoption of the attached resolution in open public session would be necessary. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolution. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Do not adopt resolution. 2. Refer to Staff for further information or revisions. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised- N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Kari Revheim, Acting Personnel Officer Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: Resolution for adoption. 3 :PER\ASR.M~ '-- I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ADOPTING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF UKIAHAND DEPARTMENT HEAD UNIT WHEREAS, the Employee/Employer Relations Officer has met and conferred in good faith with representatives of the Department Head Unit; and WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding attached as Exhibit "A" has been arrived at; and WHEREAS, said Memorandum of Understanding has been presented to the City Council for its consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED that the attached Memorandum of Understanding is hereby adopted and the Employee/Employer Relations Officer is authorized to enter into this Agreement for the Fiscal Year 1995-96. PASSED AND ADOPTED this the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: day of , 1995, by ABSENT: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK PER/RES .MOU