Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-02-21 PacketM - Motion CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting PROMPT RC - Roll Call CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 February 21, 1996 6:30 p.m. VV- Voice Vote AD - As Desired o Wattenburger 2. 3. M/RC 4. . Mayor to Read . Mayor to Read All M/RC Roll Call Invocation - Dedication of Meeting to Retired CDF Division Chief, Tom Neilson Pledge of Allegiance Approval/Correction of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 7, 1996 RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Receive and Approve Report of Disbursements for the Month of January 1996 b. Receive and Approve Additional Report of Disbursements for the Month of December 1995 c. Deny Claim Received from Robert Levy, and Refer to City Insurance Carrier REMIF d. Accept Work as Complete by Peabody TecTank, Inc. for Installation of Water Tank and Authorize the City Clerk to File Notice of Completion e. Accept Notification to Council Regarding Purchase of Liquid Polymer Product f. Receive and File Audit Report for June 30, 1995 and 1994 Transportation Development Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds g. Receive and File 1996-97 Goals and Objectives for Personnel/Pdsk Management and Secretarial Pool Divisions h. Authorize Payment for Emergency River Bank Repair to Mendocino Construction in the Amount of $89,243.64 M - Motion RC - Roll Call VV - Voice Vote AD - As Desired . Mayor to Read o M/RC M/RC Announce AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is an item of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Consideration of Request From Evanglical Free Church to Amend Municipal Code Regulating the Use of Trailers and Camp Cars 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Accept the Final Report of Watershed Sanitary Survey for Upper Russian River and Upper Main Eel River Prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. 12. 13. a. Authorize Payment to Spiegel and McDiarmid for Legal Services Rendered Relative to Headwater Benefit Issues, in the Amount of $7,500 and Authorize the Director of Public Utilities to Make Payment from the City of Ukiah's General Operating Reserve Fund at the Northern California Power Agency CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS CLOSED SESSION a. As per Government Code Section 54956.8 - Conference with Real Property Negotiator Regarding 825 North State Street Property, for Right of Way Acquisition from R. Shoemaker Parcel 14. ADJOURNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 February 21, 1996 6:30 p.m. Resume . Wattenburger 2. Mayor 3. 2 corr./Apprvd 4. Roll Call Invocation - Dedication of Meeting to Retired CDF Division Chief, Tom Neilson Pledge of Allegiance Approval/Correction of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 7, 1996 Urgency Item Added to this Agenda under 10c. New Business o RIGHT TO APPEAl. DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. . Mayor to Read Approved Approved Denied c. Accepted/Authorizedd. Accepted RF Pulled to New Bus. g. 10b. Authorized h. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Receive and Approve Report of Disbursements for the Month of January 1996 b. Receive and Approve Additional Report of Disbursements for the Month of December 1995 Deny Claim Received from Robert Levy, and Refer to City Insurance Carrier REMIF Accept Work as Complete by Peabody TecTank, Inc. for Installation of Water Tank and Authorize the City Clerk to File Notice of Completion e. Accept Notification to Council Regarding Purchase of Liquid Polymer Product f. Receive and File Audit Report for June 30, 1995 and 1994 Transportation Development Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds Receive and File 1996-97 Goals and Objectives for Personnel/Risk Management and Secretarial Pool Divisions Authorize Payment for Emergency River Bank Repair to Mendocino Construction in the Amount of $89,243.64 . Eric Sunsweet Discussed/RF . Referred to staff Accepted Authorized Adptd Res. 96-41 11. 12. 1" D. In - 8:53 pm Out - 9:24 pm No action AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is an item of business on the spoke agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 10. NEW BUSINESS - moved up by Council b. Receive and File 1996-97 Goals and Objectives for Personnel/Risk Management and Secretarial Pool Divisions PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Consideration of Request From Evanglical Free Church to Amend Municipal Code Regulating the Use of Trailers and Camp Cars 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Accept the Final Report of Watershed Sanitary Survey for Upper Russian River and Upper Main Eel River Prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 10. NEW BUSINESS a. Authorize Payment to Spiegel and McDiarmid for Legal Services Rendered Relative to Headwater Benefit Issues, in the Amount of $7,500 and Authorize the Director of Public Utilities to Make Payment from the City of Ukiah's General Operating Reserve Fund at the Northern California Power Agency c. Adoption of Resolution Designating Agent for Filing Financial Assistance Application to State of California for December, 1995 Storm Disaster CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS CLOSED SESSION a. As per Government Code Section 54956.8 - Conference with Real Property Negotiator Regarding 825 'North State Street Property, for Right of Way Acquisition from R. Shoemaker Parcel 14. ADJOURNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - February 7, 1996 Page i DRAFT The City Council convened in a regular meeting, of which the agenda was legally noticed and posted, at 6:33 p.m. Roll was taken with the following Councilmembers present: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. Absent at roll call; Councilmember Shoemaker. Staff present: City Clerk McKay, City Attorney Rapport, City Manager Horsley, Senior Planner Stump, Public Works Superintendent Looney, Airport Manager Bua, Finance Director Elton, Assistant to the City Manager Harris, and Public Utility Director Barnes. 2. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance Councilmember Wattenburger requested a moment of thought to the memory of Landfill Equipment Operator, Jim Hamilton and Mayor Fred led Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Special Order of Business - Dedication of Meeting to the Memory of Jim Hamilton Councilmember Wattenburger spoke of the dedication and respect of Jim Hamilton, who passed away on January 27, 1996. APPROVAL/CORRECTION OF MINUTES 4a. Regular Meeting of January 17, 1996 M/S Malone/Wattenburger to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 17, 1996, as submitted. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. Absent: Councilmember Shoemaker. 4b. Regular Adjourned Meeting of January 30, 1996 M/S Malone/Wattenburger to approve the minutes of the regular adjourned meeting of January 30, 1996, as submitted. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. Absent: Councilmember Shoemaker. 4c. Regular Adjourned Meeting of January 30, 1996 M/S Malone/Wattenburger to approve the minutes of the regular adjourned meeting of January 30, 1996, as submitted. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, and Wattenburger. Abstain: Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. Absent: Councilmember Shoemaker. 5. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Mayor Schneiter reviewed Government Code Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedures. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S Malone/Wattenburger to approve the Consent Calendar as follows; 6a. Accepted letter of resignation from Planning CommisSioner Brent Smith and authorized the City Clerk to advertise for applications. 6b. Declared surplus property of 1992 Crown Victoria automobile and approve scrapping of vehicle. 6c. Rejected all bids for 12,000 feet of #2 AWG, 15KV cable received December 12, 1995. 6d. Awarded bid for five 25 KVA and five 37.5 KVA transformers to General Electric Supply Company in the amounts of $4,906.70 and $6,896.20, respectively. 6e. Awarded bid to Cues, Inc. for a Mini-Mainline Sewer Inspection Camera in the amount of $11,250.53. 6f. Awarded bid to Ail Pure Company for annual contract for Chlorine Products in the amount of $36,501.20. Reg. Mtg. February 7, 1996 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - February 7, 1996 Page 2 The motion on the floor was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. Absent: Councilmember Shoemaker. 7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No one came forward. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 9a. Consideration of Letter Received From Mendocino County Requesting Discussions Pertaining to Sales Tax Sharing Mayor Schneiter outlined information provided to Council and discussion with Council ensued. He indicated with the apparent information he cannot support loosing any sales tax. Councilmember Malone commented he understands the County's concerns, but the City also has similar concerns. He suggested we should both get together to stop sales tax leakages and possibly provide public services jointly. He reminded the Council that the City provides recreation for all County residents, and although analysis of who provides what, could be extensive, efforts should be directed to recover 5% and get the State to pay for the services they mandate the County to cover. County Administrator Scannell reported the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors just asked for initial discussions to begin regarding sales tax sharing. He outlined County funding statistics and noted the County and the City had a sales tax sharing agreement in the 1960's. He indicated the Board just wants to commence civil discourse regarding this issue. Mayor Schneiter indicated the Council's staff report reveals that the distribution of sales tax from sales inside our City reflects that the County benefits too, and does receive increased revenue. County Administrator Scannell explained cost allocations of percentage of sales tax dollars that are restricted with only 1% of portion being discretionary. He indicated it is this 1% that they wish to discuss. He noted as our retail sales drop, the County assumes they are going to the City. He recommended a similar Redevelopment mechanism be established to set up a base and then pay each year from growth on the base. Councilmember Malone noted statistics provided by the Friedman Brothers controller indicated $14 million goes down the road out of County. He explained that only one penny on each dollar spent in the City of Ukiah has to fund planning, police and fire services which are greatly impacted by these retail growths. County Administrator Scannell agreed that the issue of sales tax leakage should be addressed. He suggested discussions could include referrals to the City and planning efforts to Cities. The City Manager reported the State has eliminated revenues to cities, and revenues have also been lost, so the City is in the same predicament. Mayor Schneiter volunteered to meet with the Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors and Administrators with one other Councilmember for an ad-hoc committee. It was the consensus of Council to form an Ad-Hoc Committee for discussions. Councilmember Wattenburger volunteered to be on this committee. PUBLIC HEARING - 7:00 p.m. 8a. Review and Conceptual Approval of Uklah Municipal Airport Master Plan and Associated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (Continued from January 17, 1996) I. Adoption of Resolution Reg. Mtg. February 7, 1996 Page 2 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - February 7, 1996 Page 3 The Senior Planner reported on the history of the development of this Airport Master Plan and outlined the recommendations and deliberations of its review by the Planning Commission and Airport Commission. Dave Heal, Hodges and Shutt Airport Master Plan Project Manager, provided an overview for Council, detailed the function of the master plan, identified major issues, outlined the plan's time frame, procedures for future revisions, referred to plan drawings, reported on the Airport's present and future roles and activities, with activity forecasts and capacity analysis. Councilmember Shoemaker arrived and joined the meeting at this time of 7:10 p.m. Dave Heal continued his presentation regarding the recommendation to reduce the width of the Airport runway to a standard 100 foot width from 150 feet. Discussion ensued regarding maintenance costs, FAA funding, airfield improvements, potential development, and a helicopter landing pad. Mr. Heal continued his report for airport washing facilities, CDF Fire Attack base development with three possible sites, and acquisition of additional land to the south. Kenneth Brody, Senior Planner for Hodges and Shutt, reported on the portion of the plan pertaining to compatibility issues, noise, safety, overflights, land use compatibility, and Mendocino County land use compatibility plan. Council queried staff and consultants regarding purchase of air space, limits of height, overflight height regulation, density in B2 zone inconsistencies and density figures concerns of Dr. Light. Discussion ensued regarding a typographical error in table from ALUC plan, possible amendment to B2 zone density wording, and recommendation to re-identify these two zones. Council queried staff and consultants regarding zones; traffic patterns; inconsistences in land zoning; safety issues relating to residences, schools and hospitals noting possible recommendations after ALUC review; limits for flying areas; and how the Airport Master Plan is used as a planning document. Public Hearing Opened - 7:47 p.m. No one came forward. Public Hearing Closed - 7:48 p.m. Council queried the consultants regarding aircraft sizing limits; safety components future recommendations not listed because FAA does not mandate fire or emergency response plans for required level of response; FAA requirements; C130 operations discouraged as this airport's size will barely accommodate one; and other factors surrounding C130's would not meet standards; and wind cone costs. M/S Shoemaker/Wattenburger to amend the proposed resolution to include B3 zone density changes, retain the 150 foot runway and reject the runway length non-expansion recommendation. Councilmember Shoemaker stated he would like to leave the possibility for future extension. The City Attorney questioned how this motion impacts to the Airport Master Plan document. He recommended that this master plan can be amended in the future if expansion is desired at that time. The consultants indicated they received direction and approval from the City Council and the Airport Commission 1.5 years ago, to not pursue expansion of the runway. Reg. Mtg. February 7, 1996 Page 3 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - February 7, 1996 Page 4 Discussion ensued with the City Attorney as to legal process for amendments. The motion on the floor was defeated by the following roll call vote: NOES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, and Mayor Schneiter. AYES: Councilmembers Wattenburger and Shoemaker. Absent: None. M/S Wattenburger/Malone to approve the Airport Master Plan with the amendments of; to leave the width of runway at 150 feet; add a B3 zone classification modification which changes the northern extended approach and departure zone from B2 to B3, and adopted Resolution No. 96-37 conceptually approving the Ukiah Municipal Airport Master Plan and Associated Negative Declaration. The motion passed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmembers Mastin and Shoemaker. Absent: None. Recess - 8:16 p.m. Reconvened - 8:27 p.m. 8b. Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report and Adoption of Appropriate Findings for the City Proposed Modification to its Solid Waste Facilities Permit for the Ukiah Municipal Landfill Located at the Terminus of Vichy Springs Road I. Adoption of Resolution Certifying Final EIR ii. Adoption of Resolution Making CEQA Findings The City Engineer/Public Works Director distributed a letter from Department of General Services and a letter received today from Gilbert Ashoff, owner of Vichy Springs Resort, of which both are to be entered into the record. He reported the City of Ukiah proposes to modify its 1979 Solid Waste Facilities Permit for the Municipal solid waste landfill in order to accommodate an increase in the permitted average disposal rate from 50 tons to per day, 7 days a week, to 190 tons per day, 5 days a week with a maximum daily waste input of 295 tons. He reported on California Environmental Quality Act requirements and the process of preparing a draft EIR, supplemental draft EIR, and EIR appendices, with public review and comment periods, public concerns and final EIR preparation. He reviewed the identified six significant impacts and recommended mitigations, five project alternatives of which four can be implemented immediately, and recommendations. The City Engineer/Public Works Director reiterated that a no project alternative would reduce the daily input to 50 tons a day, seven days per week, and current usage at the City landfill by County residents is 50%. He noted current volume level is at 106 tons per day which the landfill is accepting 5 days a week. Public Hearing Opened - 8:42 p.m. Miles Crail, 1494 Fawnwood Drive, noted he has been active in this process and has read the draft EIR, the supplement and the current EIR, and feels it does not address the issues he has raised plus others concerns. He understands that the dump has generated substantial revenue to City, but to keep this running full speed is immoral. He spoke to additional traffic, and his observations of activity at the landfill since 1978 and different closing dates projected. He noted increased earth moving appears to cause increased sedimentation flows and erosion during storms. He feels the EIR is inadequate and should not be adopted. Judy Pruden, 304 South Hortense; expressed concern for the adequacy of the EIR. She urged Council to not expand the dump capacity to 100 tons per day, because Vichy Springs is a historic site and urged Council to read letter from State; she urged against overriding considerations and noted concerned citizens will file lawsuits. She stated that it appears to her that the letters of public concerns were not adequately addressed in the EIR, and she urged Council to address other alternatives, such as sending garbage out of the County. Phil Snider, AB 939 task force, noted this task force represents people from all over the County and spoke to the tasks of this committee when landfills have closed. He expressed his appreciation Reg. Mtg. February 7, 1996 Page 4 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - February 7, 1996 Page 5 to the City of Ukiah for taking County garbage from these areas. He noted the Ukiah landfill will be the only landfill open to receive garbage until an alternative is activated. He indicated he hopes Ukiah will continue to be concerned for all of the County. Eric Sunswheat, PO Box 363, Potter Valley, he did not see his concerns in this document, but is unsure of what he sent in. He wonders why composting is not included as a mediation. He spoke to economic advantages of composting, referred to articles on recycling plastics, material recycling and transfer stations; and suggested the money spent on mitigations could be used for composting. Marjorie Ashoff, 2606 Vichy Springs, stated when she asked David Evans of the Water Quality Control Board for a layperson's interpretation of just how contaminated the Ukiah landfill is, he told her the Ukiah landfill is many times more contaminated than the Casper landfill is. She feels increasing tonnage in a contaminated dump is unreasonable. Public Hearing Closed - 9:13 p.m. Councilmember Malone questioned leachate at the landfill. The City Engineer/Public Works Director answered leachate is affected by variables such as surface area of the refuse cell, amount of rainfall and the amount of runoff into the refuse cell. He spoke to the need to keep surface area to a minimum for the purpose of reducing the amount of leachate production. He explained the test results. He explained the stipulation agreement requires us to amend this permit, for receipt of over 50 tons 7 days a week. ' Council queried staff regarding options, diversion tonnage, California Integrated Waste Management Board requirements and definitions. Mayor Schneiter questioned staff whether the city has ever been informed or been in communication with Dave Evans as to our contamination level being much greater than the Casper landfill. The City Engineer/Public Works Director stated no document or verbal correspondence from Dave Evans has ever been received which informs us that the City dump is many times more contaminated than the Casper landfill. Councilmember Shoemaker questioned the status of repair to Vichy Springs Road and questioned road standards minus other new developments. The City Engineer/Public Works Director referred to a letter from Budge Campbell to fix Vichy Springs Road with joint in house resources. Bob Parker, Mendocino County Deputy director, answered that accelerated loads will increase loads which is projected to significantly impact this road in the future. He noted both City and County could mutually agree to maintain and one time permanently fix it. He explained that residential use on a road, is not as substantial. Councilmember Shoemaker questioned if this sharing of resources has been approved by the Board of Supervisors. Bob Parker, Mendocino County Deputy director stated from the audience, for the record, that the County Board of Supervisors has approved staff to enter into discussions pertaining to a cost sharing agreement for Vichy Springs Road mitigations with the City. Council queried staff regarding hauling increases related to transfer stations, CEQA issue is increasing daily tonnage and future impacts due to this expansion of use of the landfill, current conditions as the environmental baseline for the proposed project tonnages from other cities, and Willits truck sizes and Reg. Mtg. February 7, 1996 Page 5 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - February 7, 1996 Page 6 trip numbers. Environmental Science Associates EIR Consultants, outlined the criteria used for road and noise projections, and mitigation . Discussion ensued regarding transfer vehicles hauling 20-22 tons, thresholds of significance relative to the EIR, findings, and larger trucks reduce impacts. The EIR Consultants explained CEQA indicates that baseline for an EIR is for existing environmental conditions at 98 tons per day, which was occurring. They explained how analysis and projections were completed. Councilmember Shoemaker stated we know that there are some people that don't like this landfill, but we are not avoiding our liability as we are addressing state mandates, and we are doing what is proper for the land, the citizens, the City and the neighbors. We cannot ignore doing the right thing. We are planning properly with a projected closure date in October 1999, so any impacts will be only for a few years. He noted this EIR was a 24 month process, with expertise from engineers and attorneys,and it prepares the City to move forward and do the right thing. He stated this landfill has been scrutinized and he is very satisfied. M/S Shoemaker/Malone to certify the EIR as complete and in conformance with the requirements set forth in CEQA and adopted Resolution No. 96-38 Certifying Final EIR for Amendment to Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Ukiah Landfill as Adequate and Complete. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. M/S Shoemaker/Malone to adopt Resolution No. 96-39, making findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15091 in connection with the Decision to submit an application to the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) and the California Integrated Waste Management Board to amend the Solid Waste Facilities Permit for the City of Ukiah Solid Waste Disposal Site. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. M/S Shoemaker/Malone to approve the project and direct staff to implement the project by submitting an application to the LEA for modification to the Landfill's Solid Waste Facility Permit. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. Councilmember Malone stated he concurs with Councilmember Shoemaker's statement. Councilmember Wattenburger stated it is his observation that Ukiah's landfill is the best run and cleanest site in Northern California. 8c. Adoption of Resolution Modifying Rental Rates and User Fees at City of Ukiah Regional Airport The Airport Manager reported on the recommendation from the Airport Commission to increase hangar rental rates, aircraft tie down fees, vehicle parking fees and operation fees at the Ukiah Regional Airport. He noted these proposed increases reflect an average of 2% increase per year since the last fee increase in 1990. The City Manager noted that comparisons to other Airports was difficult to complete due to the variables of hangar sizes and age, funding sources, content allowances and private or public ownership. Council queried staff regarding how parking fees are imposed and on what type of vehicle and trailers. Reg. Mtg. February 7, 1996 Page 6 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - February 7, 1996 Page 7 Public Hearing Opened - 9:55 p.m. No one came forward. Public Hearing Closed - 9:56 p.m. M/S Mastin/Wattenburger to adopt Resolution No. 96-40, modifying the rental rates and user fees at the City of Ukiah Regional Airport. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. NEW BUSINESS 10a. Approve Request from Ukiah P.A.L. to Use the Ukiah Regional Airport for an Air Show June 29 and 30, 1996 M/S Malone/Shoemaker to approve the request allowing Ukiah Police activities League (PAL) to use the Ukiah Regional Airport for the 1996 Air Show. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. 11. CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS Councilmember Mastin - Reported the United Way allocation committee needs a volunteer for this upcoming year, as he has resigned. Councilmember Malone - Reported on the Chamber of Commerce meeting and noted a committee has been formed regarding the NCRA railroad depot property. Councilmember Wattenburger - Reported he attended the Ukiah Fire Department volunteer awards dinner; questioned EDFC membership; and noted he would like to dedicate the next meeting to Tom Neilson. Councilmember Shoemaker - Reported he knew Jim Hamilton and noted our loss of a great man; reported that the League of California Cities Redwood Empire Division is the most powerful due to highest membership on committees; and reminded Council of the MSWMA public hearing on Feb 21st here in evening. Mayor Schneiter - Reported last week he attended strategic planning in NCPA: reported on his APPC meetings in Washington DC and warned Council that very serious utility wars that are coming and requested a workshop in March for Council to discuss these issues; and noted a letter from City Treasurer is expected. 12. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS The City Manager reported a new hub is ordered for the IBM AS400 for additional ports so that the Council office will have a personal computer in the next couple of months. CLOSED SESSION 13a. As per Government Code Section 54956.8 - Conference with Real Property Negotiator Regarding 825 North State Street Property, for Right of Way Acquisition from R. Shoemaker Parcel Councilmember Shoemaker left the meeting at this time. Council entered Closed Session at 10:20 p.m. Council came out of Closed Session at 11:00 p.m. The City Attorney noted no action was taken. 14. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:01 p.m. CCMIN.220 Cathy McKay CMC/AAE, City Clerk Reg. Mtg. February 7, 1996 Page 7 CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 February 21, 1996 6:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation - Dedication of Meeting to Retired CDF Division Chief, Tom Neilson 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approval/Correction of Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 7, 1996 o . RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request ora Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff.and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Receive and Approve Report of Disbursements for the Month of January 1996 b. Receive and Approve Additional Report of Disbursements for the Month of December 1995 c. Deny Claim Received from Robert Levy, and Refer to City Insurance Carrier REMIF d. Accept Work as Complete by Peabody TecTank, Inc. for Installation of Water Tank and Authorize the City Clerk to File Notice of Completion Accept Notification to Council Regarding Purchase of Liquid Polymer Product Receive and File Audit Report for June 30, 1995 and 1994 Transportation Development Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds Receive and File 1996-97 Goals and Objectives for Personnel/Risk Management and Secretarial Pool Divisions Authorize Payment for Emergency River Bank Repair to Mendocino Construction in the Amount of $89,243.64 eo g. h. . AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is an item of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 8. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Consideration of Request From Evanglical Free Church to Amend Municipal Code Regulating the Use of Trailers and Camp Cars 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Accept the Final Report of Watershed Sanitary Survey for Upper Russian River and Upper Main Eel River Prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. 12. 13. a. Authorize Payment to Spiegel and McDiarmid for Legal Services Rendered Relative to Headwater Benefit Issues, in the Amount of $7,500 and Authorize the Director of Public Utilities to Make Payment from the City of Ukiah's General Operating Reserve Fund at the Northern California Power Agency CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS CLOSED SESSION a. As per Government Code Section 54956.8 - Conference with Real Property Negotiator Regarding 825 North State Street Property, for Right of Way Acquisition from R. Shoemaker Parcel 14. ADJOURNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH DESIGNATING AGENT FOR FILING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR DECEMBER, 1995 STORM DISASTER WHEREAS, in December, 1995, the City of Ukiah incurred damage during the severe wind storm: and WHEREAS, the City declared a state of emergency due to the amount of damage received by both private and public properties; and WHEREAS, the City is applying to the State of California for financial assistance to cover some of the expenses caused by rescue and cleanup efforts during this disaster. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Ukiah City Council authorizes the Assistant to the City Manager to execute for and in behalf of the City of Ukiah, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under P.L. 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act for December 1995 Storms, which occurred in December 11-13 of 1995. THAT the City of Ukiah, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the State Office of emergency services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of February, 1996 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Fred Schneiter, Mayor Cathy McKay, City Clerk mfh:wrxloc~ STDIAS2211~ Volume 5, Number 3 ATTRA to be funded by revamped USDA in FYg6 ATI2~ in 1996 will be funded by the recently revamped US. Department of Agriculture, but its mission to provide the latest information about sustainable agriculture to professional agriculturists will remain unchanged. Also, ATrRA will continue to operate from offices at the landgrant University of Arkansas at Fayetteville with the ~me toll-free number. Cooperative Services In February, ATTRA will be included in the USDA's Rural Business - Cooperative Service (RBS). More spedfically, ATTRA will work with the Cooperative Services Program of the RBS, which along with two other major programs is part of the USDA's Rural Economic and Community Develop- ment (RECD) program. RECD role The USDA/RECD was created during the 1994 reorganiza- tion of the USDA, as the USDA consolidated rural economic programs which had previously been scattered among various agencies. The Farmers Home Administration, Rural Development Administration, Rural Electrification Adminis- tration and Agriculture Cooperative Service were discontin- ued, with their roles passed to the RECD. To serve the 61 million people living in U,S. rural areas 40% of whom have incomes that dassify them below the 'The fact that both ATTRA and Coopera- five Services serve a farm-oriented clientele that is thirsty for info on how to farm and market more effec- tively certainly makes them a good fit.* -* Randall Torgermn, Deputy Administrator, Cooperative Services federal poverty level -- RECD funds projects and provides tedmical assistance to create quality business opportunities, jobs, services, housing and utilities The RECD recognizes that the federal government cannot by itself solve the problems facing rural America. So, it attempts to influence and motivate others ~ such as state, local and tribal governments, private and non- profit organizations, and user- owned cooperatives ~ to engage RECD programs are administered through three rural development services: the Rural Business - Cooperative Service, the Rural Utilities Service and the Rural Housing . (See USDA page 4) ATTRA survives Congressional cliffhanger: secure program's FY96 funding ATrRA will continue to serve as a national provider of sustainable agriculture information in FY96, thanks in large part to the efforts of its many friends in the agricultural sector, Congress and the Clinton Administration. On September 28 after a /A11RA b~ 0d~u t0 U.S. Fab & Wk~le Ser~k:e funding c]iffhanger and a /01t~ ~~ ~g pmg~m~ funded flurry of activity ~'See ~ imkle by ATmA supporters, the Congressional Joint Conference Agricultural Appropriations Committee approved funding to keep ATTRA alive in FY96. Prospects for ATTRA's survival looked glum last June .when the U.S. House of Representatives tn its markup of the 1996 federal budget offered words of praise for ATrRA but zeroed out FY96 funding. Soon after that development was reported in the September issue of ATTRAnems, ATTRA supporters and sustainable sentatives and senators in key states. Action alerts were issued by the Campaign for Sustainable Agriculture, the National Family Farm Coalition and others. In mid-September, Senators J. Robert Kerrey (NE) and Herb Kohl (WI), with strong support fi.om Senator Dale Bumpers (AR), tntroducecl an amendment to transfer $2.3 million of USDA tm-al development funds to a category which included ATTRA and the Rural Technology and Cooperative Development Grants Program CRTCDGP). The Senate Appropriations Committee approved the amendment containing language recommending "up to $1,3 millio~ for ATTRA." Fmally on Sept. 28, with broad bipartisan suptx~t, the Joint Conference Agricultural Appropriations Committee ap- proved the bill containing the Kerry-Kohl amendment. Other Congressmen backing the bill' were Jay Dickey (AR), Richard Durbin aL), Marcy Kaptur (OH), Frank Riggs (CA), Ray Thornton (AR) and James Wa~sh (NY), and Senators Conrad Burns Thad Cochran (MS), Tom Harkin (IA), Arlen Specter CPA), and others. ATTRA is now working with (See Funding page 4) ATTRA horticulturists create new publications on "hot" '~t Topi~" enable stall, rs fO re~oond quickly to info /fort staff a/so revamps ottmr ATI'P,A's horticulture staff members have created some new publications about topics which are currently receiving a great deal of discussion in tion on the topics has increased sharply at ATYRA. "the new Current Topics publications will enable us to respond quickly with concise, detailed information about the topics which are of growing interest to our users," AITRA Technical Specialist. Rex Dufour says. As with other ATTRA standard U.S. ag topics 'materials, Current Topics will be mailed within 48 hours of a caller's request. In addition to the new publications, ATTRA horticul~ts have also revised several other publications on topics of current interest to the farm sector. ATTRA users may order any of the ~ following new and revised materials, which are: reCurrent Topics Albrecht-Rea~ms Biok~i_'cal Fertility S_vsten~_ Alternative Nematode Control ' Bamm~ Organic Production Citrus: Organic Production Farmscaping Gourd~ Organic Production Organic Sweet Corn Production Organic Tomato Production .Pawpaw Production Sustainable Fireant Management Vnatform~tion Packages Fmld-Grown Cut ami Dried Flowers Herb Production and Marketing Hydroponic Vegetable Production Integrated Pest Management Organic Greenhouse Vegetable Production Organic/Low-Spray Apple Production Sustainable Pecan Production ~'Other Topics Chestnuts Living Mulch~ Luebke Com~stin~ ~ Permacultute - Spec~ty Vegetab~ Wfldflower pmpagatioa Woody OmamemaLs ATTRA plans series of' beef workshops ATTRA is planning a series of workshops around the U..q. to help cattle produc- ers survive the tough times ahead. The first workshop, titled "Complementary Beef Management on Pasture" and scheduled for April 16-18 at Fayetteville, AR, will concern beef production in the fescue belt. Similar workshops featuring regional experts will be held around the U.S., depending on reader interest. Surviving tough markets "The cattle industry has lagged behind other agricultural sectors in hosting programs on sustainablility but producers are hungry for the information," says workshop organizer Dr. Ron Morrow, former professor of animal sciences at the University of Missouri and co-org~ of grnzing schools at the Forage Systems Research Center there. "Several years of diminishing cattle prices are forecast for U.S. producers, and so now more than ever they must adopt sustainable methods to become more competitive economically. The .workshops will show producers how to become much more efficient at producing cattle on pastures with decreased dependence on purchased inputs." Workshop speakers In addition to Morrow, other speakers at the April workshop will be Jim Gerrish, Valerie Tate and Fred Martz, researchers at the Forage Systems Research Center; ATTRA technical spe~allsts Preston Sullivan and Alice Beetz; Dr. Ann Wells, a veterinarian and sheep producer working in complementary animal health; and Stevie Forbes, beef cattle producer from Excolsior Springs, MO. Workshop sessions will center on employing a holistic approach to establish goals for the ranch and evaluate farm resources; soil resource evaluation; intm~sive grazing; pasture field exercises; landscape effects on grazing; plant species selection and pasture improvement;, extending the gm,lng season; livestock nutrition needs on pasture; marketing and value-added products; sustainable health practices; water/fencing systems; and layout and design of grazing systenv~. Fees for the workshop are $250 for people registering before March 25 and $3(X} after that deadline. Readers interested in attending the Northwest Arkansas workshop or a beef production workshop in their area are asked to contact Preston Sullivan at ATFRA, P.O. Box 36S7, Fayetteville, AR 72702, Telephone 1-800-346-9140, FAX (501) 442-9842, Intemet emaH prestons~ncatfyv.uark, edu. Sustainable ag programs receive FY96 gov't funding Following are FY96 levels for federally-backed U.S. sustainable ag programs: Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE): An $8.1 million appropriation, $12,000 less than the FY95 appropriation. Sustainable Agriculture Technology Development and Transfer Program (SATDTP): A $3.4 milh'on appropria- tion, down from last year's $3.5M. Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA): USDA will allocate neces- sary funds to maintain the program. Water Quality Incentive Program:(WQIP): An $11 ll~illion appropriation, a decrease from FY95's $15 million. Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP): A $77 million appropriation, a decrease from FY95's $932 million. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRC, S): A conservation operations appropriations of $629.9 million, an increase from the FY95 appropriation of $586.9 million; overall appropriation is $859.4 million, an increase from FY95's $836.7. ATTRA's work includes I'm looking at a bar chart ~or the number of requests ATTRA has responded to between 1989-1995, and am espe- ~lly interested in the comparison between the 1994 and 1995 ~g years. Our staff c'~tp~d more than 16,000 cases in 1995, a 25% increase over 1994. ATTRA's funding was the same irt both years. I look back to 1989, when we completed a little more than 4000 requests, so that our current level of · requests is quadruple that of the earlier years of the project. I feel proud of our staff who worked together to allow us to respond to this continually increasing interest from the agricultural community. 1995 innovations A few of the tasks that contributed to a successful 1995 include: improving telephone reception, data entry and mailout; designing, writing, editing and pubUcizing new materials and newsletters; organizing and updating our library materials; improving our computer system perfor- mance and Internet access; keeping accounting and office operations working well; leading and guiding others. But requests or "cases" as we call them, are only one indica- tor of the ways in which ATTRA helps others. Our staff are more than answering information requests speakers, exhibitors and organizers of meetings and confer- ences where farmers, extensionists, researchers, agency personnel, information providers, agribusinesses and others benefit ~ learning about our service or about technical topics. We get many more requests for this kind of assistance than we have staff time and resources to respond to. Often we send materials and displays when we ourselves cannot attend. ATTRA is infommfion conduit ATTRA also publicizes and recognizes the innovative work of organizations and farmers, researchers and educators, thereby spreading their impact and influence beyond what they may be able to do on their own. In addition to technical production-related questions, we have provided information to newsletter writers and other media seeking information on sustainable agriculture. My phone might ring at any time, and someone may ask me for contact information for a person, group or project. Another staff member's phone may ring and a researcher or farmer who gave ATTRA informa- tion on their latest work might now need a quick tip in identifying a resource THEY need. These and other linkages that we do as part of our daily work may never show up in the case statistics, but are sf~ll an important part of our con~~ to the agricultural community. ATTRA staffers wo ing on Renew America's 'National Town Meeting' 60 U.S. cities facing environmental problems to be downlinked Several ATTRA staff members are helping to coordinate local host sites for a national video conference scheduled for Feb. 26 by Renew America, a national nonprofit founded in 1979 to help solve the country's most critical environmental problems. Renew America conducts the Environ- mental Success Index, the National Awards for Enviromental Sustainability, and the National Town Meeting. Video conference is Feb. 26 Titled "Environmentally Sustainable Communities: A National Town Meeting," the 90-minute, interactive video conference will downlink opinion makers with over 60 partial- paring U.S. cities which face common environmental problems. The town meeting is sponsored this year by AT&T and the U.S. Department of Energy and moderated by former CBS and CNN correspondent Deborah Potter. The National Center for Appropriate Technol~ ~ which administers the ATrRA project and many programs dealing with sustainable agriculture, low-income energy/housing issues and resource-efficient housing -- is co-sponsoring community panel discussions for the video conference at Butte, MT, and Fayetteville, AR. National panelists National panelists for the video conference will include Henry Cisneros, Secretary of the US. Dept. of Housing; Christine Ervin, Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy; David Brower, chairman of Earth Island Institute; Al Weed, chairman of the Sustainable Economic Development Group, Thomas Jefferson Sustainability Council; and Ernanuel C!~ver, Kansas City mayor. People Wishing to obtain further information or attend conference events at Fayetteville, AR, ahould contact cynthia Arnold, Al'Ill& P.O. Box ~657, Fayetteville, AR ~2702, phone (S01) 442-9824, fax (SOD 442-9842, email address cynthiaaOnc~tfyv.nari~du. Information about the Butte, MT, conference can be obtain~ from Jeff Birkby, National C~nter for Appropri- ate Technology, P.O. Box ~BS, Butte, MT $9702, phone (406) 494-4S~, fax (406) 494-2905, emafl address jbirkby~ncat, org. ATTRA bids adieu to Fish & Wildlife SeMce ATTRA will conclude a fruitful and enjoyable seven-year partnership with the US. Fmh and Wildlife Service in February when it comes under auspices of the USDA. '"We will miss working with the many good friends we made in the Service, but want them to know how much we appreciate the support and guidance they have provided since taking us under their wing in 1989," ATTRA In addition to its work of providing information of benefit to the U.S. environment and wildlife, ATTRA helped the Fmh and Wildlife Service with several specific projects. ATTRA lion at Service workshops and assisted refuge managers as they implemented "We hope that Service personnel and their farmer cooperators will continue to call ATI3~ for sustainable agricul- work of preserving wildlife populations and habitats," Maurer notes. "We have great expec~tions for our new home within USDA, but will always treasure our personable working relationship with Fish and Wildlife." USDA (Continued from page 1) RBS enhances rural life The Rural Business - Cooperative Service works to enhance the q,,~ity of rural life by providing leadership in building competitive businesses and cooperatives that will prosper in the global marketplace. RB$ encompasses the former Agricul- tural Cooperative Service and some of the business and economic programs of %Ve identify strongly with that mis- sion," says Maurer, ~and we look forward to our new relationship with the agency while continuing to serve farmers, ranchers and others involved in Randall Torgersan, deputy administra- tm' for Cooperative Services, also notes, ~rhe fact that both ATTRA and Coopera- tive Services serve a farm-oriented clientele that is thirsty for info~mation on the former Rural Development Adminis- how to farm and market more effectively tration and Rural Electrification Admin- cerminlymakes them a good fit. istration. RECD field offices administer '~rith farm program chanffes resulting . PBS and other USDA rural development in a lower safety net, farmers and programs at the local level, ranchers are pressed to find self-help ATTRA & RBS: Good combo. ~ solutions in marketing and more effec- 'ATTRA's afffiiation with PBS will be rive means of sus~le production. good for us and for the agency,`` says Our joint programs address these critical ATI~A Project Manager Teresa Maurer. needs," he says. One of RBS's mission goals is to: "Assist in the development of strategic, sustainable and environmentaUy ser~- five economic growth that meets the expressed needs of rural communities.`` "There are as ~m_nny visions of the farmin! futura, of course, as there are definitions of gosta/nablillty...What I brought back from the road, from the farm, are some exemplary tales from a few places where sust~inshle agricul- ture has taken hold and i~ promi~in_~ to ~pread throughou~ the United b-~ates." - Author Verlyn Klinkenbo~, "A F~r~in~ Revolutiol~# ~liidOZLB] Geofruphie, December, 1995 ............ Cooperative Services Program The Cooperative Services (CS) Program of the RBS helps rural residents to form new eooperative businesses and improve operations of exiM~g coops. CS services range from an initial feasibility study to devel6pment of a business plan, induding helping to identify sources of ~mancial assistance. It also carries out a program of research, .education and information on the cooperative method of doing business, and has over 100 publications under title. Ag marketing, farm supply and related service coopera- tives are its ~ focus. Readers and cooperatives can obtain more information about CS by contacting USDA/PB$ Cooperative Services, AG Box 3255, Washington, DC 20250-3255, ph~,e ¢202) Funding (Continued from page 1) USDA officials to receive FY96 funding of $1~ million. As ATFRA Project Manager Teresa Maurer notes, ATTRA caseload increased by 25% in FY95 and so the $1~3 million in funding would enable sta~ers to keep pace with antid- AITF n ws ATTRA~.a publication ofAppropriate Tech- ~x)logy Transfer for Rural Areas, is mailed free of charge to ATTRA friends and tmerL ATTRA disseminates information about sus- tainablo agriatltah-e and low-input farming to U.q. farmers, agribusiness. Extension agents, wildlife professionals, and other in- .rested people. ATTRA is funded by a ~rant from the U~. Fish & Wfld~t'e Service and is ~_dmlnlatered by Lhe National C. ent~ for Ap- propriate Technology (NC. AT). a nonprofit org*-i,atlon dedicated to helping communi- ties and individuals find ~ug~linable way~ of improving the quality ofUfe.,,*i-_o ~ and re~xu~e~ at hah& .~:~® Te4:d~:)iow Trc~s~ loc Rural P.O. Box ~667 Fayeflev~, .~ 7~70~ I..IQ0-3~.9140 A prelect c~tt~ gc~x~ ~ fcw Apjxopdato Tocmdow Eric Sunswheat P.O. Box 363 Potter Valley, CA95469 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FOR RURAL AREAS P.O. Box 3657, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72702, (501)442-9824,1-800-346-9140 February 17, 1995 Re: ATTRA 62361 Eric Sunswheat PO Box 363 Potter Valley, CA 95469 Mr. Sunswheat: Thank you for contacting ATTRA for information on Controlled Microbial Composting (C.M.C.) and humus management. C.M.C. compost is a humified compost that has been microbially inoculated, aerated, and monitored to ensure high standards of quality. The C.M.C. method was developed through on-farm and laboratory research by Siegfried and Uta Luebke of Austria. Humus management is a system of soil management the Luebkes use in conjunction with C.M.C. compost. Each of these techniques are described below. The Luebke Family The Luebkes are well known in Europe and rapidly gaining a wider audience in the U.S.,.especially the Mid-Atlantic states, the Midwest, and in California. Siegfried and Uta'Luebke were married some 30 years ago and have managed an organic vegetable and dairy sheep farm for about 25 years. Early on, they realized the importance of soil microorganisms in the management of agricultural soils. They gained insights from several people, including Anne France', a biologist herself but principally wife of Raoul H. France', author of the classic soil microbiology text, Bios: The Laws of the World. They also met directly with co-workers of Dr. Ehrenfried Pfeiffer, late founder of The Pfeiffer Foundation in Spring Valley, NY. Dr. Pfeiffer was a microbiologist and agronomist who studied under Rudolf Steiner, the founder of biodynamic agriculture. The Luebkes obtained Pfeiffer's recipes for B.D. Compost Starter and B.D. Field Starter (green manure inoculant). This material served. as the building block for the microbial inoculant the Luebkes manufacture, known as C.M.C. Compost Starter. The Luebkes also adopted Pfeiffer's method of using the circular chromatogram to evaluate soil health. A'ITRA is operated by the National Center for Appropriate Technology and funded by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dept. of the Interior. Printed on Recycled Paper. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 2 The Luebke humus management system is simple, yet effective. It relies on forage- and covercrop-based rotations, green manures, proper tillage operations, rock dusts, microbial inoculants, and C.M.C. compost to meet all fertility and pest control needs. Several "indicators" that this system really works are provided below. · In a ten year period, the organic matter content of a clay loam soil on their farm was changed from 2% to 15% · Following fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident, root vegetables raised on their farm were uniquely free of radioactive contamination in comparison to other farms in the region · The nitrate-nitrogen content of vegetables raised on their farm was significantly lower than conventionally-grown produce in Austria · Microscopic slides (dyed with Acrodyne Orange) prepared from soils and composts on the Luebke farm "luminesce" in UV light due to the presence of microbes In response to numerous requests for information, the Luebkes began teaching classes. Currently, Uta and Angelika Luebke (her 30-year old daughter)-co-teach classes while Siegfried stays home to manage the farm and conduct soil microbiology research. These classes consist of a 3-day Humus Management Seminar and a 4-day C.M.C. Compost Seminar. The seminars include both classroom instruction taught with slides and hands-on lab activities. Their main focus is in Central Europe, but they've also taught classes in Norway, Finland, the United States, and India. The October 1994 seminar in Pennsylvania that I attended was the third year in a row the Luebkes have conducted seminars in the U.S. Past seminars have been held in California, Missouri, and Pennsylvania. Their first speaking engagement in the U.S. was at the Acres, U.S.A. Conference in 1985. The host for C.M.C. Compost Seminars in the U.S. is George Leidig. Leidig lived and studied with the Luebkes for 3 years in Austria and now runs Autrusa Compost Consulting in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. Leidig coordinates certified C.M.C. activities and product distribution in the U.S. This includes the domestic manufacture of Sandberger Compost Turners, Top Tex compost fleece distribution, and laboratory testing for compost and soil analysis. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 3 Humus Managements Humus Formation & The Role of Soil Microbes Basic to humus management is an appreciation for the role of soil microorganisms in the formation of the clay-humus crumb as well as in the mineralization of humus and release of plant nutrients. Humus is the end result of organic matter decomposition by microbes. When fresh, undecomposed organic matter (green manures, animal manures, crop residues) is added to soils, an extremely rapid multiplication of soil microorganisms takes place. Certain microbes (bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes) break this raw organic matter down into smaller particles (gums, waxes, lignins) resistant to further decay and simple organic compounds (sugars, amino acids) that are water soluble. Following the breakdown phase, a second group of microbes bind together these materials, especially lignins and microbial biomass, into more stable humic substances (fulvic acid, humic acid, humins). The process whereby raw organic matter undergoes biological transformation and winds up complexed as humic substances is known as humification. Friable humus (also known as effective or nutritive humus), which supplies slow-release nutrients over a period of weeks or months, is a short-chain humic compound. Stable humus (also known as permanent humus), which has a half- life of years and may be viewed as the soil humus bank, is a long- chain humic compound.- When conditions are right, microbes attach these long-chain humic compounds to the clay fraction resulting in a clay-humus crumb. The goal of humus management is to arrive at an active, quality humus that is not soluble in water but rather soluble in root secretions from plants. In a healthy soil system, the Luebkes propose that a natural feedback loop exists whereby plants secrete root exudates telling microbes what they need, and in response, soil microbes regulate mineralization of the clay-humus crumb and feeding of the plants. One of Dr. Pfeiffer's theories was that inoculating soils and composts with microbes would help regulate the humification process. He understood there were basic laws at work in soils and that microbes regulated these activities. Using the analogy of building a house with carpenters, masoners, and electricians, Uta Luebke explained that in Nature, different microbes do specialized tasks. Therefore, microbe A cannot do the work of microbe B if it is not in its genes to begin with. Further, Uta explained that when specialists are missing, it takes longer to do the work. For example, when crop residues from last growing season or even 2-3 years ago are still visible, it's an Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 4 indication of a poor, inactive soil. In a good, microbially active soil, residues may be gone in as little time as a few weeks. Based on these ideas and the material provided by Dr. Pfeiffer's lab, Siegfried Luebke spent several years modifying the Pfeiffer recipe. The end result is C.M.C. Compost Starter, a mixture of 55 different types of microbes. Management= CroD Rotations and Green Manuring Early on, the Luebkes learned how to inoculate green manures from Dr. Pfeiffer. They found enhanced formation of the humus crumb in comparison to non-inoculated green manures. They also found inoculated green manures breakdown faster and therefore enable the farmer to plant back sooner. Normally, a 3-4 week delay between green manuring and planting is recommended. The Luebkes often plant a vegetable crop the following day(s) after.green manuring. In April-May, every day is valuable for plant growth. Prior to putting out greenhouse transplants, green manures in the field are growing very nicely and accumulating extra nitrogen. It is important, then, when planting into freshly incorporated green manures, that the soil be capable of digesting the organic matter. The key is a microbially active soil via inoculation of green manures. "Farming is quite different when you work with an active soil," explained Uta. The Luebkes became convinced that microbial inoculation was making a difference when they were able to roto-till in mid-summer and the tiller sank down Snto a loose, friable soil; normally a tiller would just bounce around at that time of year. On the topic of establishing green manures and cover crops, Uta said that soil needs a plant cover at all times. They reseed a cover crop as soon as they take off a cash crop. The basic sequence goes like this: chop or shred green manure, let it lay on the field until the moisture is right for tilling the soil, and then inoculate just before you turn it in. The inoculant is applied via boom spray nozzles (1.2 mm, cone-shaped mist nozzles) on the front of the tractor. A spade plow is attached to the back of the tractor. The tillage implement used is a vital component of the system. Do not use tools that create a hard pan. The spade plow is preferred because it works the soil up and provides good aeration. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 5 The inoculant is applied at 1 unit/ha which costs $50/ha (about $20/acre). A tank is mounted on the side of the tractor. The volume of water required is enough to get the starter prep into solution and spread well. Following incorporation of fresh organic matter, the microbe population builds up rapidly. Young green material decomposes in as little as 5 days. Rain following incorporation is desirable to move organic matter into deeper layers where it gets incorporated into humus. Uta said that you can in fact build humus in deeper soil layers; i.e., beyond 2-3 ft. As an example, she showed a slide of a carrot crop that had roots going way down. The Luebkes grow a variety of cover crops. Faba bean (Horse bean) is popular in Austria. They raise rye, and rye-vetch mixtures. Legumes are important because they are nitrogen fixers. One of their main rotations is an alfalfa-grass mixture that stays in the ground without fertilization or compost for 4 years. The mix is cut to provide feed for their dairy sheep and green chop for their compost. On the last rotation, it is chopped, inoculated, and turned under as a green manure. When asked about the removal of green chop or hay from the alfalfa stand in relation to depletion of soil organic matter (O.M.), Uta said that when O.M. is 5% or above, top removal will not affect the soil'situation; below 5% O.M., removal is too much. A few details on green manuring are very important: · Be sure you have enough moisture for microbes to do their work; otherwise, O.M. will not be attacked properly · Oxygen is the other factor that should not be overlooked Never work deeper than you can guarantee availability of oxygen · If soil is too moist when it's time to green manure, chop it and allow it to dry on the surface prior to incorporation · Always chop first · It's important to cut the tops from the roots · Top removal causes root sloughing, a microbial food source · Microbes work faster due to the greater surface area · The more control during breakdown process, the less likely problems such as putrefaction will occur · For example, when you turn down green manure and it rains 5 days later and washes out real bad...go back and work soil again Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 6 The Luebkes inoculate green manures every time The Luebkes use C.M.C. Compost Starter for green manures · Use B.D. Field Starter as a substitute, since the Luebke starter is not yet available in the U.S. * Incorporation, at least partially, is essential so microbes can work it · When left on the surface, microbes are killed/inhibited by UV light · Heavy residues tend to go anaerobic and putrefy · Green manures provide microbes with food which enables them, in turn, to do their important work in the soil Humus Management: Compost Application The Luebkes found that C.M.C. compost can be applied at about half the rate of compost made by the "old" method. For heavier feeding vegetables, they apply compost at 20 tons/ha, which is about the same as 7 tons/acre. Applications of 10 cu meters/ha/yr are recommended as maintenance rates. This is "as little as" 3 tons/acre. No more is needed with good compost. One problem that was brought to Uta's attention is that manure spreaders in the U.S. are calibrated to a minimum of 5 tons/acre. Uta said that compost spreaders in Europe are made to handle lower rates. The Luebkes apply 6-8 tons compost/acre for greenhouse tomatoes, which is about the same applied to field cultured tomatoes. They use a 1:1 compost to soil mix for transplants. They add 1/3 sand for soil blocks (cubes) . Slugs were a real problem in one bed of onions that a gardener was taking care of. The gardener counted 12,000 slugs in one year. He added C.M.C. compost and they went away. Uta said the task of slugs is to take care of putrefaction. The soil in this bed ~as not digesting organic matter properly and therefore anaerobic conditions prevailed. C.M.C. compost helped correct the imbalance. One lady who took their classes prepared some C.M.C. compost and applied it to her carrots. One weeding for carrots was all that was needed. Before, they required 4-5 weedings. A decrease in weed pressure is a good sign of soil improvement. This is a common observation of organic farmers all across Europe. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 7 Humus Management: Soil Evaluation and Testing Evaluating the humus condition and biological activity of the soil is an important part of the Luebke program. The techniques they've arrived are especially useful in light of the crucial role humus plays in organic farming systems and its formation and regulation by soil microbes. The Luebkes use tests for: percent organic matter; humus; buffered pH; and circular chromatography. The Chroma Test The chroma test is also known as the circular chromatography test. It is done by wicking an alkali extract (sodium hydroxide) from either a soil or compost sample onto circular filter paper treated with silver nitrate. Silver coagulates humic substances. Unless you are well equipped to do lab work on your farm, it is much easier to have a commercial laboratory do the test for you. This test is based on the fact that humus is formed during composting and that as the process progresses the relatively low molecular-weight humic substances produced initially are polymerized into less soluble, macromolecular, mature humus. Chromatograms are interpreted by the shape and color of the central, transitional, and peripheral zones. Various colors are noted: white, pink, brown, violet, and black, as are shapes such as smooth, jagged or irregular (1) . The chroma test provides a visual, qualitative test of soil health. As soil microorganisms are involved in the humification of raw organic matter in soils (or during composting), the chroma test is a good indicator of soil microbial activity. In other words, humic substances travel different distances by capillary action depending on their molecular weight. The degree to which they've been humified indicates the level of microbial activity. Other features that can be learned from chromas include: · Good colloidal humus formation vs. acid humus substances · Various phases of compost fermentation (first, decomposition; second, humus formation; third, mineralization and greatly advanced decomposition) · Aerobic vs. anaerobic condition Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 8 Dr. Pfeiffer of The Pfeiffer Foundation in Spring Valley, New York, used the chroma test extensively. He published a handy, 44- page book, Chromato~raDh¥ Applied to Quality Testinq, containing color plates and descriptive entries for different soils, composts, and grain samples. It is available through: Biodynamic Farming & Gardening Association P.O. Box 550 Kimberton, PA 19442 (215) 935-7797 The Humus Test Organic matter tests, like the Walkly-Black method, are based on extraction with concentrated sulfuric acid. The result is given on a percentage basis. Typical organic matter rates runs around 1.0-2.0% for a sandy loam and 2.0-5.0% for a clay loam. The colorimetric humus test described here was developed in the United States earlier in this century, but apparently fell out of widespread use. The Luebkes teach it in their seminars and several commercial soils labs in the U.S. have started offering it. Apparently, East German agriculturists have been using this test for many years, but this was unknown until the fall of The Berlin Wall. The humus test is an indication of the level to which soil organic matter exists in a humified state. Humified organic matter is in a stable form and therefore nutrients and simple organic compounds associated with decomposing organic matter are less likely to leach away. In evaluating soil health, the Luebkes have found that O.M./humus readings should ideally be in a ratio of 1:2 or 1:3. Briefly, the humus test is a colorimetric comparison test. Soil or compost samples are processed with a weak alkali solution (sodium hydroxide) and then fixed with EDTA chelating agent. The filtered solution, or extract, that results from this procedure will have a distinctive color. The resulting sample is then compared to a standard set of colored vials on a scale of 0 to 100. The vials range from light yellow to dark yellow; light orange to dark orange; and light red to dark red. The darker the color, the greater the presence of humus. The humus test is a relative number, not a percentage. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 9 Buffered pH Test Another test the Luebkes use in conjunction with the chroma and humus test is the buffered pH test. It is based on the difference between a normal pH reading and a buffered pH reading. Potassium chloride (KCL) is used as the buffer. This test provides information on potential and actual pH, and therefore provides an indication of the biological activity in soils. The aim is to achieve a difference less than 0.5 for soils and 0.3 for compost. The Complete Luebke Soil Health Picture To get a complete picture of soil health, it is important to use all of the tests described above. Soil tests should be done by the same lab so that readings are accurate and meaningful in comparison to each other. Using C.M.C. compost and humus management techniques, the Luebkes were able to raise the organic matter of a clay loam soil from 2% O.M. to 15% O.M., with humus readings of 45 to 50. The Luebkes said that 2% soil O.M. is an absolute minimum to support normal biological functioning. Suggested ranges or goals for organic matter in agricultural soils are: Field crops Vegetables, orchards, pastures Gardens 3 -5% 5-8% 10-14% In the U.S., George Leidig of Autrusa Compost Consulting provides a complete testing se.rvice associated with C.M.C. compost and humus management. A chroma-humus-O.M, test costs $45. Contact: Austrusa Compost Consulting P.O. Box 1133 Blue Bell, PA 19422 (610) 825-2973 C.M.C. ComDost PreDaration C.M.C. compost is a high quality compost with the following characteristics: · Aerobically produced · Proper microflora · Nutrients in stable form · A high ratio of humus to total organic matter · No sulfide, nitrite, or other harmful plant compounds Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 10 · Low ammonium levels · Nitrogen fixed into stable humus and microbial biomass C.M.C. compost is built in layers, and laid out in windrows for mechanical turning. The base layer should be a dry, high carbon material like municipal yardwaste (leaves and shredded tree trimmings) or dried hay or straw. A moist, high nitrogen material (animal manure, green chop) is laid down next, and so on, in repeating layers. In preparation of C.M.C. compost, the following general rules are important: . The compost site should have a 3-5% slope in the direction of the windrow. There should be no side slope. These points relate to water drainage; water that collects under the compost pile will result in putrefaction. . Protection from drying winds. Windbreaks are an effective method for modifying the environment in this regard. . Access to water. The source may be a fire hydrant, creek, pond, or well, but it is important that no chlorine is present because chlorine kills microbes. Water is used to regulate moisture at optimum levels during composting. , Electrical power source. A power source is needed for the testing equipment. 5. Storage space for yardwaste and compost material. In addition, other items that are essential to C.M.C. compost include: · Use of Sandberger Compost Turner · Use of Top Tex compost fleece · Addition of 10% by volume clay loam in compost pile · Addition of 10% by volume finished compost in pile · Addition or diabase or basalt rock dust at 10-20 lbs/cu yd · Inoculation with C.M.C. Compost Starter Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 11 · Proper and timely aeration, or turning with compost turner · Monitoring of temperature, pH, 02, C02, NO3-, N02-, S02-, NH3 The Sandberger Turner was designed and tested for use with C.M.C. compost preparation and moves very slowly (900 ft/hr). The drum itself revolves slowly and the tines are designed to roll the material towards the center of the pile and thoroughly mix everything together. The end result is a well-aerated, fluffy pile. Several Sandberger models are available, including self-propelled and tractor-pulled types. Tractors used in combination with the Sandberger should have a minimum of 55 h.p. and either a hydro- static drive or a "creeper gear." For tractors that do not have such a slow-moving feature, a diesel-powered "gear box" on wheels is available to "push" the tractor and attached Sandberger turner at a slow pace. Sandberger models available in the U.S. include: Baby Turner Industrial Turner Tractor pulled Gear box 7 ft wide 10 ft wide 10 ft wide $13,000 (self-propelled) $30,000 (self-propelled) $14,500 $4,500 Top Tex compost fleece is a geotextile.that sheds rainfall but helps retain moisture inside the pile; it als° blocks UV light harmful to microbes working the outer layers of the pile. In Europe, where composting is regulated to control nutrient leaching and runoff, compost fleece is used almost universally. Addition of 10% clay ~oam by volume is important in the formation of clay-humus crumb. Addition of finished compost helps regulate moisture and potential odor in the pile. Rock dust feeds the microorganisms and provides micronutrients. Compost monitoring tests are done on-site using a compost test kit that contains all the instruments required to measure temperature, pH, oxygen (02), carbon dioxide (C02), nitrates (NO3-), nitrites (NO2-), sulfides (SO2-), and ammonia (NH3). While tests for organic matter, colorimetric humus, and circular chromatography (as described in the humus management section above) can be done by a commercial lab, the tests described here must be done on a daily basis by the composter themself. C.M.C. Compost Starter is not yet available in the U.S. It should be available sometime in 1995. In the meantime, I suggest using B.D. Compost Starter from the Pfeiffer Foundation in Monsey, NY. Contact: Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 12 The Pfeiffer Foundation Threefold Farm P.O. Box 524 Monsey, NY 10952 914-356-6522 One of the unique characteristics of C.M.C. compost is the careful and frequent aeration, or turning, of the windrow. C.M.C. compost takes 6-8 weeks to prepare. In a 6-week period, the windrow is turned 17 to 22 times. A typical schedule might go something like this: Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5-6 7 times per week 6 times per week 5 times per week 4 times per week 2 times per week Tmplementing C.M.C. ComDost on Your Farm Finally, information on C.M.C. compost preparation is limited because it is still fairly new to the U.S. This letter summarizes the key points of humus management and how C.M.C. compost fits into the picture. It also summarizes the key procedures used in the preparation of C.M.C. compost. For those interested in trying C.M.C. compost, here are a few suggestions: i · Acquire some finished C.M.C. compost and use it on test plots or as a potting mix ingredient. Observe the results and judge its performance in comparison to current practice~. · Visit a C.M.C. composter, see the methodology, and ask questions. What have Luebke practitioners learned? · Contact George Leidig or one of the regional distributors of C.M.C. technology · Attend the 3-day Humus Management Seminar ($400) or the 4-day C.M.C. Compost Seminar ($600) held each fall in Pennsylvania and California · Implement parts of C.M.C. compost technology as affordable resources and time allows· For example, use your current compost turner, but integrate other C.M.C. concepts and methods such as use of clay loam soil, compost fleece, inoculants, frequent aeration, etc. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995. page 13 Organic farming is based on a healthy soil well supplied with humus. The Luebkes evaluate the humus condition through several innovative soil tests, and manage soils through the use of well- planned crop rotations, green manures, rock dusts, proper tillage, microbial inoculants, and C.M.C. compost. C.M.C. compost requires specialized training and purchase of additional equipment and supplies. While many people will not be able to adopt this technoloqy in its entirety, at least initially, some farmers are choosing to adopt the general concepts and methods outlined by Luebkes, going as far as their current equipment and resource situation allows. On the other hand, the green manuring techniques described herein are easily adopted and will greatly speed up formation of the humus crumb. Whereas some farmers may be hesitant to spend $20 per acre inoculating a green manure, the cost of the inoculant may be viewed as a fertilizer input (since no additional N-P-K fertilizers are applied in the humus management system). I hope these comments and enclosed materials are helpful. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me at ATTRA. Best regards, Steve Diver Technical Specialist References= 1) Mathur, S.P. 1993. Determination of compost biomaturity. I. Literature Review. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. Vol. 10. p. 65-85. Enclosures= Autrusa Compost Consulting: composting supplies price list Autrusa Compost Consulting: lab test price list Autrusa Compost Consulting: "why Compost?" Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 14 Enclosures: (continued) Koch, Erich, and Siegfried Luebke. 1988. Testing the fitness of compost. Unpublished manuscript. 14 p. Leidig, George. 1993. Austrian compost technology comes to the U.S. Northland Berry News. June. p. 10, 17. Leidig, George. 1993. Rock dust and microbial action in soil: The symbiotic relationship between composting and mineral additives. Remineralize the Earth. Spring. p. 12-14. Luebke, Siegfried. No date. Controlled microbial composting. Unpublished manuscript. 4 p. Mulder, Jane. 1991. Windows into worlds unseen. Matters. Fall/Winter. p. 24-27. Organic Food Top Tex product literature Sandberger produc~ literature: compost kit Sandberger product literature: Baby Turner Sandberger product literature: tractor-pulled model Useful Resources: Wass, Gerry. 1993. The Carbon Catcher Program. The Water Foundation, Brainerd, MN. 31 p. Booklet available for $4.95 from: The Water Foundation P.O. Box H20 Brainerd, MN 56401 218-829-3616 This little booklet summarizes the role of humus in ecological farming, outlines the basic principles of ecological agriculture, lists publications and resources, and contains a directory of alternative agricultural consultants and soil fertility labs. ATTRA's Cover Crops and Green Manures and Farm-Scale Compostinq Information Packages provide a good introduction and summary of these important practices and list many useful resources and contacts. Free copies are available from ATTRA at 1-800-346-9140. ATTRA is operated by the National Center for Appropriate Technology under a grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dept. of the Interior. These organizations do not recommend or endorse products companies, or individuals. ' NOR TH COAST RAILROAD A UTHO February 16, 1996 Joyce Beard Clerk of the Board City Selection Committee County of Mendocino 301 S. State Street Ukiah, CA 95482 Dear Ms. Beard: The State Law which provides the basic organization framework for the North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA) provides that one of the seven Board Members shall be selected from among the cities served by the line. The current City representative is Cloverdale Mayor Mark Kinsey. Mr. Kinsey's term expires in April, 1996, and he has reported to the NCRA Board Chairman that he does not plan to seek reappointment. When Mr. Kinsey was appointed in 1994, we attempted to employ'an' election process among all of the relevant cities. This proved to be an unwieldy process, producing a multitude of nominees. At its meeting of February 14, 1996, the NCRA Board adopted a new precedent' for selecting the City representative. At this time, we are inviting the City Selection Committee in each County to provide nomination for appointment to the NCRA Board as the City representative. The basic criteria for appointment is: 1. The individual must be from one of the cities "served on the line". Our definition of this provision of law is that it means any City which has direct access to rail service within the three counties. 2. The individual need not be an elected official. 3. The individual must be able to actively participate in NCRA affairs, including attendance at monthly Board meetings (second Wednesday of each month; 10:00 a.m., location rotates among the three counties), committee meetings and occasional trips to Sacramento. 4. There is no compensation (travel reimbursement only). West 2nd Slreet Eureka. CA 95501 Phone: (707) 44,1 -I 625 Fax: (707} 4.4.'I-I 324. NCRA Board Chairman Allan Hemphill has requested that I coordinate the process of selecting a new City representative. We would like to make the appointment at our meeting of April 10, 1996. Your assistance in convening a City Selection Committee meeting to make a recommendation is appreciated. We request that any nominations be submitted in writing to NCRA Board Chairman Allan Hemphill, North Coast Railroad Authority, Four W. Second Street, Eureka, CA 95501, not later than March 22, 1996. Please contact me should you need additional information. Vice-Chairman Board of Directors (707) 961-2823 GDM:ps cc: Bruce Burton, Mayor of Willits Patti Campbell, Mayor of Fort Bragg Raven Earlygrow, Mayor of Point Arena Fred Schneiter, Mayor of Ukiah B16CITY.SEL/NCRA96 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH DESIGNATING AGENT FOR FILING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR DECEMBER, 1995 STORM DISASTER WHEREAS, in December, 1995, the City of Ukiah incurred damage during the severe wind storm: and WHEREAS, the City declared a state of emergency due to the amount of damage received by both private and public properties; and WHEREAS, the City is applying to the State of California for financial assistance to cover some of the expenses caused by rescue and cleanup efforts during this disaster. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Ukiah City Council authorizes the Assistant to the City Manager to execute for and in behalf of the City of Ukiah, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under P.L. 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act for December 1995 Storms, which occurred in December 11-13 of 1995. THAT the City of Ukiah, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the State Office of emergency services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of February, 1996 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Fred Schneiter, Mayor Cathy McKay, City Clerk STOIAS2219~ ITEM NO. 6a DATE February. 21, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 1996 Payments made during the month of January 1996, are summarized on the attached Report of Disbursements. Further detail is supplied on the attached Schedules of Bills, representing the four (4) individual payment cycles within the month. Accounts Payable check numbers: 75087 to 75510. Payroll check numbers: 63268 to 63658. This report is submitted in accordance with Ukiah City Code Division 1, Chapter 7, Article 1. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Report of Disbursements for the month of January 1996. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS' N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Candace Horsley, City Manager Prepared by: Gordon Elton, Director of Finance,Jj, f... Coordinated with: Kimberly Sechrest, Accountsq~ayable Specialist Attachments: Report of Disbursements APPROVED: Cma~'-ace Hc~rsley, City ~anager AGENDA. WPD/krs CITY OF UKIAH REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS REGISTER OF PAYROLL AND DEMAND PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 1996 Demand Payments approved: Check No. 75087 to 75510 inclusive. FUNDS: 100 120 150 141 142 200 220 230 260 300 312 320 332 335 405 410 550 575 600 618 611 612 620 652 660 General Fund Capital Improvement Civic Center Construction Museum Grants National Science Foundation Asset Seizure Fund Parking Dist. Rev. Fund Parking Dist. #1 Rev. Fund Downtown Business Improv. Gas Tax Airport Master Plan Grant Airport Clear Zone Fund Federal Emergency Grant Comm. Dev. Comm. Fund Youth Services Ukiah Conference Center Fund Lake Mendocino Bond Garage Airport Flood Damages Sewer Construction Fund City/District Sewer Special Sewer Fund (Cap Imp) Redip. Sewer Enterprise Fund Sanit. Disp. Site $116,327.05 $123.75 $1,578.58 $1,176.39 $1,765.00 $7,200.00 $1,350.00 $2,483.00 $114.36 $13,953.94 $13,654.78 $21,156.98 $12,008.64 $306,405.17 $103,512.74 $21,160.51 $53,565.50 662 663 665 670 675 678 680 693 695 696 697 698 8OO 8O5 820 920 910 900 940 950 960 962 965 966 310 JPA/LTF Fund Countywide JPA Refuse/Debris Control U.S.W. Billing & Collections Contracted Dispatch Services Public Safety Dispatch Ambulance Service Clubhouse Renovations Golf Warehouse/Stores Billing Enterprise Fund Fixed Asset Fund Electric Street Lights Water Liability Fund Worker's Comp. Fund Special Deposit Trust Payroll Posting Fund General Service Community Redev. Agency Redev. Housing Fund Redev. Capitol Imprv. Fund Redevelopment Debt Svc. Special Aviation Fund PAYROLL CHECKS NO. 63268 to 63454 PAYROLL PERIOD 12/17/95 to 12/30/95 PAYROLL CHECKS NO. 63455 to 63658 PAYROLL PERIOD 12/31/95 to 1/13/96 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS PAYROLL DED. CHECKS PAYROLL CHECKS TOTALPAYMENTS CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK This register of Payroll and Demand Payments was duly approved by the City Council on $709.51 $123,189.72 $2,682.85 $1,291.67 $3,683.37 $44,657.60 $6,463.51 $43,893.14 $619,377.74 $8,245.70 $37,278.86 $24,224.08 $177,206.98 $786.93 $31,105.14 $1,500.00 $72,189.91 $4,191.72 $1,880,214.82 $148,155.23 $343,784.12 $2,372,154.17 City Clerk APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER I have examined this Register and approve same. City Manager CERTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I have audited this Register and approve same for accuracy and available funds. Director of Finance U ~ 0 ~ Z rq ~00000~0~~0~00~0~0~0~0 ~C~0H~~H~ ~H~ ~QZH Z C~ 0 ~ ~ g ' C~ Z ZGQ U ZCZ UZ< UZU U~ U ~H 0 mz c zm uc z u Od~Z © Z Ux~OQ~' UHQ~ ~Z~QQ~ >. ~CZ~.. mC © ~ZO I ZZ N~U Q~QU ~zmo I U oQ o~ %0 OH O~ Qo > ~ ~ > < on ~ ~ HHHHH ~ ~0 ~ ~ Z " ~H ZZZZN n ~ >~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ z N 0 N ~ ~O O ~ ~ O O O O O ~ · O O O~OO~ OO OOO~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O O O ~ O ~ ~ O O O~O~ Ooooo ~ O O~o~ ~ N N h~ H ~ O H H ~ ~ Z H Z H H ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <<<< ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ H ~ H H~H~ HHHH ~ H ~ ~ ~ C 0 ~ H NNNN ~  H NHQHHH H- OOOOOO ~DD ~ O OOHO C OOOOOO OOOO ~ O OO~O OOOOOO ~ O ~ HH~ ~O~OOO OOOO ~ ~ ~O~ O.O ........... ~o~oo0 ~ ~ D D~D ~ ~ OOOO 0 O OO00 ''' '''' '''' O OOO OOOO 0 O OOO0 O 0oo OOOO O O OOOO O OO0 OO00 O O I I %0 O ~ o~ 0~ ~ o o~ (31 o ..J I O~ O O i"O ...J O ..,I O ',D ,~. O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O ~O O O ~ h~ k~ O ~ O O ~ ~ ~ OOOOOO ~ O ~ OOOO OOOOOO OOOO O O OOOOOO OOOO O O OOOOOO OOOO O O OOHHHO OOOO O O ~ H ~0 oooo ~ C oooo H ~ oooo Z H OOOO ~ ~ O0 On C::~ "~t~ ~0 00000 HHHHH~ N N < oN ONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONO~ ~¢ oZ ~H H~HHHHHHHHHHHHHhHHHHH~H- ~- N~ ~0 N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N~ ~ ~ ~ H HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH H~ ~ ~ N H\ N ~ o ~ ~ o ~0~ ~ ~o ~ o ~ ~ o ~0~ ~ ~o N N NN ~ H ~ ~HH ~ UNNN N ~ C ~ OH~ C O~m~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000 ~ h ~H 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 000 0 O 0 ~W 0 O00 0 000 · . .. ... ... O H 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 OWO  0 0 OO 0 O00 O OOW .. .,. .,~ 0 O O HH 0 000 0 O0 ., .., .. O 0 0 O0 O 000 O ~ 0 0 O O0 0 OOO O ~ H 0 0 OO O O00 O ~ HHHHHHHHHH~HHHHHHHHHH~H ~ ~ H ~ O0000~O0~O00000HOO~ 0 OOOOO~OO~OOOOOOOOOO~ O OOO~OO~OO~OO~ ~ ~ OO0~O0~OOO~OOO000~O00~ ~ HHHOH~OHH~,~HWHHOHH~,O 0 ~ .......... O .......... O. , N 0000000000 0000000000 0 0 ~ ..,.,,..., ...,....., . ~ 0000000000 0000000000 0 0 ~ 0000000000 0000000000 0 0 0000000000 0000000000 0 0 C ~ Z ~ oo ~ ~ 0 ~ 000 ~ ~ O00 ~ ~ OO ~0 O0 ~ ooo 0 0 0 O0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 0 O0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 0 O0 0 000 0 000 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~0~ ~ 00000 00000 00000 00000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 U1 H o t~ o Z ~ Oqq C N~ ~ N 0 ~ ~ < oN 0 ~ ~H ~ ~o~ ~0 ~ HH~ H ~ N~ ~0 ~o >o~ ~ o~ o~ ~0 ~0 ~0 000 oo N ~HHHHH ~ ~H H~ HHH NH 000~ ~ 0 000~ ~ O0 O00mm w O0 00000 H ~0 ..... 0 O, 000~ ~ ~0 00000 0 00000 0 00000 0 Z 00 oo · 0 ow , 0 oo oo oo ZOO oo 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 00000 0 O0 0 O0 O0 00000 0 O0 0 O0 O0 00000 0 O0 0 O0 O0 ~0 Z HHHHH Z 0fl fl 0 ~C H0~ (1 0 0 0 0 ~0 U U ~H H ~ ~ ~H ~0~ Om ~U o~ ~ ~ H~ OH ~ H 0 · HHHHH ~00~ 0 O 0 0 00~ O0 000~ 0 0 0 O OOO O0 ~~ ~ ~ 0 0 0~ ~~ ~ 0 O 0 000 00~00 O ~ ~ ~ ~ .,o., ,o, ooooo o o o ~ o~ oo o,,., . o., ooooo o o o o ooo oo ooooo o o o o ooo oo ooooo o o o o ooo oo 0~ , , o o ©© ©© ©© ©© · o ©o © © © © 0o~I qH ©© ©© ©© ©. © o1o10 · . . o~ ©© o , ©, © o o 0 C ~ Z o ~ oo o%0% o%o% oo oo o~o~ ~oo 01o oo oo 00000 0 0 0 0 000 O0 0 O0 O0 O O0 OO O0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 000 O0 0 O0 O0 O O0 O0 OO 0 00000 0 0 0 0 000 O0 0 O0 O0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 ~~ ~ ~ 0 0 000 O0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ o~] 0 0 H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0< ~ ~ ~0 ~ 00~ H~ ~ H~ ~ ~ ~ HO H ~ ~ H ~H ~ H~ ~H ~ ~ ~ Z Oq 0 ~ 0 0o0o <<<< Cx HHHH ~ HHH~H ~OO00 ~OOOO ~0 ~00 0~ ~0~ OOO~O 00000 OOOOO O000~ 0 O~~~O 0 0 0 ~00~00~0 ~ 0 ooo ooo H · ZZZ' ~ZZZ' ~ H .~. . H . q OOOOOOOOO0 O ~000~000 0 H~OOHH~O0 00~00~ ~ 0000000000 0 ~ 00~00~ 0 0 o o o O o 0 (~ 00 0 ~0~00 HH NN HZ HH oo ~ ~ oo oo oooo .. . .... 0 .. O0 ~ HHH~ oo oo oo HH ~H O0 O0 .. .. .,.. .. O0 O~ 0000 O0 .. ,. .... ., O0 O0 O000 O0 O0 O0 0000 OO HH O0 0000 O0 0~ 0000 0 << NN ~0~ oo O0 , . oo . o. o , o o o 0000o oo0oo 000o0 O OOOOOOOOOO O 0 O O 0 OO O OOOOOOOOOO O O O O O OO O 0OOO00OO00 0 O O O O O0 ~ ~O000OO000 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O0 O0 0000 O0 O0 O0 0000 O0 O0 O0 0000 O0 oo 0101 oo oo O0 ~0 o~0 o~ ~0 H ~ o~ HHH n~ 0 H~0 ~o HN ~t~ N 0¢ HHHHH HHHHH c [~[~ H ~00 H~ ~H 000 0 H H 0 0U ~0 H ~0 ~ ~ ~ H HH 0 ~ H ~ ~ ~N z ,,m I ~ ~ ~ "H 0 0 H ~ H ~ H ~ · o o O~O.J moo ~ ~ z ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ o ~fl ~ 0 ~ o OO .. .. oo ~ o ~ .. .. . ~ ~ ~ ~ o oo ~ ~ ~ ~ O0 oo o 0 ~ .0 . oo 0 o 0 O0 o 0 o oo 0 o 0 0 ~0~ O0 O0 · . . . oo . . oo oo oo 0HHHHH HHHHH 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 ~ ~o o H~ o~ ~ 0o~ o H U~C ~ U~ U~N~N ~ U~ ~ H 0 ccu ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N H ~H ~ ~ H H Z~Z H H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~MM H ~ ~o o O ~ o~0~ 0 ~ ~ C O OOO O ~ OOO0 0 OOO 0 ... .. .... . .0. . ~ ~o ~ ~ o~ ~o ~ ooo ~ ~ oo~ o oo ~o~o ~ ~o~ O~. ~ ~ ,~.~ ~ .... ~ ''~ '' O'O. ~q~ ~ N O ~0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O~O O O ~O ~ ~W ~ ~ WO~ O 0 OO O OO O O O .. .. O~ O OO 0 O O ~ O OO O O O O~ ~ OO 0 O O O~Ul I I O0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O0 ~ O0 0 0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 0 0 O0 O0 ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ o0ooo 0oooo 00ooo ~o~ 0101O1 oo0 o0o o00 oo oooo oo o0oo oo ooo0 ooo 0oo oo0 ~0 ~0 ~0 o < o . ~ ~'-H O~ ~0 C <<< HHH HHH HH ~U 0 00~ ~ N 0 o HHHH ~H ~ ~ HNHHHHHHHHH~ ~N ~ 0 0 ~ · ~ 0~ OH ~ ~ ~H ~.~ o~ ~0 o~ 0~ ©© , o ©© , o · o ©© ~ O0©~O~O00O ~ ~ ~ O~ OOO~O~O00OO O~ 0 ~ ©W ~O000~O~OOH ~ ~ 0 O0 HH ~HH~H~HHO 0000 0 ~ HH ,, ............... '' O0 OOOHOOOHHHO O~ O O OO ,0.,0000,.. 00., OOOOOOOOOOO ~OOO O O OO OOOOOOOOOOO ~OOO O O OO OOWOOOOOOOO OOOO O O oo oo OO ~ H ,..J -..J O0 ~ oo (~ t oo I~ O oo ~Ok~ O0 0 O0 ooooo o O O OO OOOOOOOOOOO ooooo o o o oo ooooooooooo OOOOO O O O OO ooooooooooo 000o ~ ~ ~ ~ o000 ~ ~ ~ II ~ w ~ ~ O0 ~o ~ ~ oo oo ~ ~ oo ~ oooo ~ 0000 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0000 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0000 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0~] ~0 ~ Z~Z~ OH h~ < mmnmnom omm N ~ ~O 0 H0H O~ HHO OOH ~CO i ~H 00~ ~~~ O00H ~ ~ H~HH~HHH~ ~0 ~ O~p~ ~NNNN 0000 NNNN <<~< OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO H ~HHHHH 0 0~~ 0 0000~ ..0... .. ~ 00~0~0 .. ...... O0 ~ ~~ oo 0 000000 0 000000 0 000000 0 000000 · · · · , , Oo~ O0 0 ©© o o ©© ©© · o · o ©© ©© ©© = o o ~ ~XX~O~X~ ~ ~ ~m~~ 000 - ' X ~ ~C ~H ~ X N~ HA o ~ o00~o~o0oo ~00 ~ 0 o 000~00oo00 00o oo ~ o oo~0~oo0~o 00~ o© o o ~O~~OH 0~' ~ ~ ~ 0o0~o©0ooo oo ~o o o oo©0oooooo ©~ oo 0 0 oo00oo~000 ~ oo o 0 00oooo~oo~ o~ O0 onmmm HHHH 0~O0 O000 O~ O~ HO~ · . . . OOOO .... OO00 OOOO 0OOO 0000 0000 0000 0 000000 O0 O OOOOOO OO O HHHH~ OO ~ 000o00 ~ ,.J ,.J..1 ,.J ~,~'- (.n Ln OO o o oo o o oo o o 0000000000 000 O0 0000000000 000 O0 0000000000 000 O0 HHHH ~000 ~0~ 0000 0000 0000 :~0 H ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~ ~ < o~ ~N 0 ~ ~ W ~ N ~' ~ H ~ 0 ~ o , N x. oh] · ,~- H ~0 oo P C ~o Z H o~ ~ ~ ~ o~ q Hm OH 0 $ 0 o 0 0 I o . (~ ~ o~] U ~ Z ~ ~ oooo~©q~o~o~o~oo~o~o o~ mO ~C ZZ n~ ~ o~ ~ ~0 q e0 0 nO0~ ZZ ~ n O0 ~ 0 ~ ~ m HH Z~ ~H O~ ~ Z~H H ~ ~N N ~N mH HH~ ~ H HHHHH < ON ~J ~Z ',.H N~ HZ 0 Z~ ~H om mm ~ ZH 0~00 ~0~ ~00 0~ 0000 0000 0000 0000 o~ ~ ~o~ ~oo~ ZZZC 0 o-~o · 0 . ~oo o~ . , . oo~0 . , . ooo ooo ooo o~o , . , o~o ~o~ · , , · o , , , . ~'o~ Z~C o.~ o01 . . oo , . o~ · . oo oo ~o ooooo ooooo ZZZZZ HHHH NNN~ 0000 O00O OOOO .,0. 0000 0000 0000 mHHHHH DO00~O 0000~0 ~0~0~0 ~0~0~0 0~0~0~ 000000 ~OOO00 ~00000 OOO000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0000 0 0 000 OOO O O0 0 OOO0 0 0 000 OOO 0 O0 0 OOOO 0 0 OOO 000 O O0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 H~O0 0 0 000000 000000 000000 000000 >o C ~ ~ · ~ HHH ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~00~ ~0 ~ ~ ~ 0 H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~00~ ~0~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OH~ ~ ~ 0 0 0000 0 , 0... ... .,, ,.., ~ q q 0 0 q 0000 ~0~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~qq ~ ~ 0 0 0000 Z ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~00~ 000 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0000 ~ ~ Z oo0 ~ a ~ H ~ O0 H DDD H 0 Z ~ a ~ ~ w 0 ~ ~ ooo o ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h 00o I ~ H ~ H~ H ~ o ~ w I o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DI'O H H H ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ..~ 0 ~o 0~ 6,1 gl -.I-~ -.I -.I ..~ q O0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 HH H ~ H 0 0 ~ ~ < o . ~ qqq H ~0 0oo ~ C ooo H ~ 000 Z H ~H H r0 t~ H 0 ~0~0 HH H N HHHHHHHHHHHHHH~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 0 00000000U XXXXXXX~ ~ ~H X ~Z C HHHHHHH~ >~ X HHHHHHH~ H~ Z ZZZZZZ~ OC ~ 0 ~O N ~ ~ 0 H Z>~ ~ 0 Z ZCC 0~ N C ~ 0Hq ~ HH ~0 HH OO ~ ~ q OO 0 ~ ~ OO ~ O ~ O OO '' ~ 0 .. ~ ~ ~ ~ OO OO O OO O OO O OO · ~ O O0 ~ 0 O~o0~oo~o0~o00~O ~ 0 ~00~00~000000~0 H N < © © ~HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~0~0~~~ 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 OO000OO000OOO000 0 ~HHHHHHH < ~~0~ 0oo00ooo ~ 0000 ~ 0~0~ 00000000 ~0000000 ~0000000 00000000 ~0000000 OO~OOO OOOOOOO ~HO00O~ 00~~ ,,.,,,, 0ooo00o ooooooo 0oooooo ~ H H HH ~ ~ O Ln01 (~ I o ~ o O H ~ ~ H ~ 0 0 0 ,~,4 -J -J ,J -J-J -J O0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 I~O ~0 ~O ~0 ~O0 (~ 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 OOO0000 0000000 O00OO00 u1 0 < o . Q ~-H ~0 N O~ <. 00[~ NN~N ~ 00 wO N H ~N 0 ~0 z ~ on ~ ~H HH Z 0 ~0 Z ,, 0 o ~o~ o ~o~o o ~o~ oooo , HHHH HHHHH H × 0 O000O 0 0 0000~ ''''0 O000W 0 OOOO OOO0 0 0000 0 O00o O OOOO 0 0000 0 0000 O0 0 00000 O0 0 00000 O0 0 00000 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0 0 0 000 o < o , N ~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH~ ~ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH~H ~Z O0~O0000000000000Z~ C0~Z ~H~iz ~] HH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~ H C 0 ~ HHH~ ~ 000 H ZZZ N ~m ~0 ~ HO HZ ~ ~0 0 ~ ! " ~0 z zzzzzzzzzzzmzmzmzzz HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH~HHH 00000000000000~0000 ~ ~0~0~00~00~00~ ~ 0000000000000000000 0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OO0 0 000000000000000~000 0 0OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O ~ HH~HHHHHHHHH~HHHH ~ HHH 0~0000000000~00 ~ 0~0000000000~00 0 ~~0000000000 0 ~000000~~~ ~ 00000000000000000 0 00000000000000000 0 00000000000000000 0 000000000000~0000 ~ 0000 0000 0~0 0000 OOOO OOOO OOO0 ~'~ 0 . , ~J~q 0 Om O~ 0 0 0000000000000000000 0 0000000000000000000 0 000~0~0~000000000 0 ~0~00~00~~~ ~ 00000000000000000 0 00000000000000000 0 00000000000000000 0 0000 000 0 0000 000 0 0000 000 0 .J -,,,,I H o~] >0 000000000000000000000000000000000000~ HHHHHHHHHHHHNHHHHHHHHHHHHHH~HHHHHHHH ~ 0 ~ 0 ~C Z HH~ ~ H HHH 0 0 Z Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 000000000000000000000000000000000000 ~O~OOOO~OOO~O~OO~OOOOOO~O~O~O~OO~ O~O0~O000~O0000~O0~O00000OO00~O~OOO O~OOOOO~OOOOO~O~OOOOO~OO~OO~ ~OO~~~~O~OO~~O~OO~O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO (DO) OO OO · , . . OO · . OO OO OO ~ ~ o oo~ o ~ ~ oooo ~OH~ N ~ ~ ~ ~00~ ~ 0 CO0 ~ ~ ~ ~ H~ZZ~ ZC~W> ~ 0 o ~ ~ oooo o o ~ o .... . 0o00 ~ o w ~ o~oo o o ~ ~ .... ~ ~ o ~o~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ o 0 o o 0 0 0 o 0 0 <nnn c ~ ~000 ~ N ZZZZ ~ N NON H q 0 Z mmm <<< ooo o C ooo o ~ . . . ooo o w~ ~ 0 ooo o C ''' Z ooo o ~ ooo o ooo o OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 O0 0 OO o oo o oo o 0000 0000 oooo oooo 0000 .~ .~ .~ ooo ooo 000 u1 o 0 ~ < o~ 000 << HHHHHHIHHHHHHHHHHHHH0~ ~ nnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnn~o HH HHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHH~ ~0 HHHHHH~HHHHHHHHHHHHH ~ CC0 HHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHH~C HHH 000000 0000000000000 n ~m0Z H HHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHH 0 N ~ < oN ~ ~H ~H N~ ~0 oooo ~~ H~ HH ~ 0 ~ ~ Z " NOON HO OOO . . . ooo , , , o0(4 , . , ooo ooo OOO ~nnnn~n~nnnnnnnH~nn~~ ~ ~ HHHHHH HHHHHHHqHHHHH~ O0 , . O0 · , O0 , , oo oo OO 00000~00000000~000000 ~ 0 ~O~HHO~~O~ ~0 0 OOOO~0OOO00000~OO~OO H~ O ~HHOO~HHHHHHHO~O~ '0 ' ..................... O, ~ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOO O ,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. 0OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O OOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000OOO O OOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO O 0~o~ 000UU HZZZCC 0HHHNN CCC~ ZZZ'~ i.~. 00000 ~000 ~00 O0~W~ 00000 00~ ~o~ 0~ C 0000 H ~ooo Z ~0 oao~ ~ , , . , ~ ~ 0 0ooo C 0,,, ~ OOOO H oooo oooo 000 O0 (4(4 000 O0 000 O0 000 O0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 0OOOOOOOO©OOOOOOOOOOO ~~OOOOOOO~~ OO O ~~ O O O OO O O0 0 00000 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 0 00000 0 0 0 O0 0 OO O OOOOO O O 0 OO 0 ~ ~ 00000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OO00 qOOO 0000 0000 0000 0000 , N O~ >o H ~ N ~0 00~ ~0 << ~ 0 ~Z 0 0 < < on ~ ~H HHHHHHHHHH0 ~ \0 NNNNNNNNNN~ ~ ~ CCCCCCCCCC~ ~ HHHHHHHHHH0 ~ ZOO0 Ommm 0 mmm 0 ,,. 000 OOO O O O O 01 ~ 0 0% 0 60 ~ . 0 -~ 0 0 U1 ~ O~ 0 U1 0 0 0 0% 0 ~ 0 0 ~3 Z Z ~ ~'- o ~0 ~ o o O o . ~ o o 0 0 o o o 0 o 0 o o ~0~ 0 00~ o ~o~ 0 Z < < Z Z · 0 N UHH~0HMMXNH 0 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~OOOOOOOOD ~ ~ ~ooooooooo Z ~o0~~o~ ~ oooooooooo ..,... .... ~ ~o~00~0 0 ~DO~OOOO~ ~ ...,...,.. ~ oooo00oo0o ~ ooooooooo0 ooo0oo0~0o I I OO oo O0 I I I 000 o0o U1 Ln U1 ,,,J U1 ,~, 0 ~ D~ ~ O0 0 000 0 0 0 D 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 O0 O0 0 O0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 O0 O0 0 O0 0 OOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 O0 O0 0 O0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 OOOOOOONOO ~ 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 o < 0 . Q o~ ~0 C Zh O0 ~ ~ ~Z ~ 0 < C C ~¢CCCCCCC~CCCCCCCC¢ ~ 0000000000000000000 ~ 0000000000000000000 H C C ~H HH~ ~ ~C 0<~ H ~ ~ ON G) 0 tn 0 [~ U~N~NN~H~NN~HN~ UNHN 0 ~ ' '~H ~ H Z 0 Z~ ~ HHH~HHHHHH~HHH HZ H ZH OOO OOOOO~OO~O~OOOOOOOO OOO ~O~O~DOO~OO~O~OO~ OHH O~O~~OO~OO~ ~O ~O~~~DOO~ OO~ OOO~OOOOOO~OOOOO~O .,.,.,,,.,..,,.0,,. .,, OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~O WOO ~O~~ O ~OOHOOOW O <z ~e ~ ~ < ~ H Z~0~ n H ~ ~ ~ HH~H W Z ~ Z ~ --~-- ~ ~ Q M ZZ~ZZ Z ~ CC~CC HH HH OOO00OO O OOOOO C 0OOOOOO O OOOOO ~ ..,,.,, · o,,., ~ ~OO~OO O OOOOO ' ' ' ~ ........ N OOD 00~ ~ 00000 C ''' ''' ''''' Z OOO 0OO O OOOOO H OOO OOO O O0000 0~0 0~0 0 ~H~ Z O O OOO O O O O O O OOO O O O O O O OOO O O O O ~ ~ ~k;~ %0 O ~O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO OOOOOOO ~ OOOOOOO OOOOOOO O OOOOOOO O OOOOOOO O OOOOOOO O OOOOO OOOOO OOOOO oH :~o C o o Z o N to 0 o o o o ~ H ON o .,j · 0 0 Z 0 o . ~} · ' W W ~ ~UH~ HU~ ~H~ ~ ~Z~O o~ ~0 ~ N 0~11 ~0~ hhHhHhhhhhHhhHhhHhhHhHhhh ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ N h~ ~ ~ ~0 ©0 0 O0 o O~O0~O~O0~O000P~O~O0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 m 00000~0~0~00000000~00000 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 O~~H~~OOhO~~ W ~ O ~ ~ ~ 00000~00000~0000000~0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 ~ · ,J-J ,~1 ,,4.4 ,,4 oo o OO 0 oo 0 00000o0o00o000oo0000o00o0 ~ w 0 N 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 N~~~~~O000 0 0 0 0 0 0 OD ~ N H~ H 0 ~ H H, 0 ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~H~H H h h h N~N N ~ ~ N ~ o ~0000 ~ 0 q 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0000 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 00000 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 00~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~000 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ,.,,. , 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000~0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ <<n ~ ~ HMO ~ ~ X ~0 000 0 0 ~ qO 00o 0 0 ~ ~o~ 0 ~ OO o0o 0 o oo ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ o0~ 0 0 oo 0oo o 0 oo ooo o 0 OO ooo ~ o o · ~l,~ 0 (~ 0 I~1~ 0 -"0 .J I I · .,I -J ,W .,J .J ..,I .,~ -,.I '.J,W -,I ',~ .W .,J ,,.I ,.J O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO ,m ,m H, ~ -~- ~ I m w Ln H 19 tn I a~ 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ O0 O0 O0 · ~ ..,1 · .I ..I OO OO oo H 0 0 o . ~ ~ ~h 0 O0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O0 0 0 0 00000 00000 ~ 0 O0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O0 0 0 0 00000 00000 H 0 O0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 HHHO0 O0 0 0 0 00000 00000 ~ H · HH ~WWW ~ W ~ ~ H IIIII \XXXX 0 0 ~ o00o0 ~~ ~ 00000000 W 0 0 HHHHHHIHHHHHHHHHHHHH0~ NNNNNN NNNNNONNNNNNN~ HHHHHH~HHHHHHHHHHHHH~ HHHHHH~HHHHHHHHHHHHH ~ HHH~HH HHHHH~HH~HHHHW~ 000000 0000000000000 H ZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZ~ZZZ C HHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHH CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC~ UZ x~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~0 ~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~ ~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~ NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNONNNNNNNNNNNNU '. H NNNNNNNNNNNNN~NN C~CCCCCCC CCCCC H HHHHHHHOHHHHHO ~O~~q~O~ ~00OOOOOO~000000 ~OOOOOOOOO~OO~00 OOOOOOOOO~OOOOOO O00OOOO0000OOOOO 0000000000000000 0~00000000000000 OOO00~00000OOO~0OO000 0OO0~O000OOO00~O0~00 00000OO000OOOO~0OOOOO 00OOOO0000OOOOO~O0~00 00000OOO0000000~OO~00 000000~00000000000000 i ~ccccc ~ ~HH~ZOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH O 0HHH~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH C ~O~DOOOO~HHHO~HDO00000000 Q ~0000~O00~~0~000OOOO0000 Z HHHO~OOO~~HHOO~O~H~OO~OOH ~.~~OOO~O~O~OOO~OH~ ~ ooo~ oo0o0oooooooooo0oooooooo C OOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~ oooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo HOOO oooooooooooooooooooooooo OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HHHHHHHO00000000 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO H OOO00000000000000000000000000 Z >o ZO00~ 0qqq ~ ~hHh0 h OO U OO~ ,,~ ~0 ..~ OO~ OO~ OO~Z 0~ n~ 0 ~ U 0 ~H C~ ~ H ~H 0 ~0 ~ 00000~ ~0 ~ HO 0 ~ ~ HZ · O0 ~P H 0 ~ X ~H ~N U ~ ~ 0 H~ ~0 ~ C H ~ ~ H U ~ Om~mm~ ~ HHHH qqqq OH qqqq OO ~ oo 0000 0000 0 0o0o 0 0000 o 00oo O0~ HOOH ~O~ ~OO~ ~ ~O ~OO~ ~ ~ ~ ~OO~ O ~ O H ~ ~HHN ~ 00~ ~ h'. ~ H H HH ~NH UU OOO ~ ~ O O ~00 HHm O 0 0'' O0, . ' ONN OO~ ~ ~ O bO 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 hhhhh 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0HH om~ HHHHH ~ 0 H- ~O~O C a OOOOO Z 00o0~ OOOOO ~ 0.,,, ~ OOOOO ~ ooooo ooooo ~UOU IIII 0~ 0~ I I O0 O0 O0 000 OOOO OO OOO 0OO O O O OOOO OO OOO OOO O O O H~ OO OOO OOO O O O 0000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 00000 00000 00000 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 (4(4 OO ~o I I O0 i~1~ -4.4 O0 O0 O0 0~0 00000 00000 00000 ~0~ 0 < 0 · ~ O~ ~0 H~ mh I ~ c c · ooooooo ~ 0 0000000 ~ h~ 0 0' 00 HH C oo.~ HH~ HH '~"0 C ~H 0 ~H ~N HHH C ~hX~ HOb ZOO~mO0 H~ZZZC~ ~oooo~ ,,0OOO,, O0 .... OO O0~O0 OOOO ~O OOOO ZZmm HHHH ~0~O OOO0 ~O~0 OOOO OOOO 0000 0000 M N H ~NNHHOH Z q q ZZZ o O ~ o ~OOO~O O ~ o OOOO~O . , H H H ~O00~H O D D ~0OOOOO H O O . . , 0 o O OOOOHHD , ,.,,,,. O O O OOO00OO H O O OOOOOOO O O O OOOOOOO N~ZZ Ze~CCC 0 0 HH~ H OOOO ~OOWW OOOO 0OO~ ,,,, ,,o,, OHiO 00~0 00000 OOOO .... OOOO OOOOO OOOO O0000 O~OO OOOOO ~ N 0 N r ON ~ H 0 0~H~ 0HH ~ C 0 0 w w ~ ~ H~ HH H ~ 0000 ~ 0 0 C oo0o OO o 0 Z O~HO OO W 0 ~OO~ ~P ~ 0 ~ .,., ,, , ~ OOO~ OO O ~ C .,,. ,. ~ OOOO OO O ~ ~ OOOO O0 O ~ ~OOO OO 0 ~ 00000000 00000000 0000 0000 0000 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 0000000 ~ 0 ~ 0000000 0 ~ 0 HHHH 0000 0000 0000 00000 00000 00000 0000 OOOO OO oo oo oo o000 OO 0 oo00 oo o oooo OO H · ,,I H O O H O 0 . N aH O~ >o C H 0 H H HH ~ H ~ 0 ~ Z oo O0 oo mO O0 0 0 O0 0 OO o o oo o lUtu I~ 0 lut~ Iu O~ >0 H 0 0 · A ~ '~H ~ O~ H ~ C H Z H (/)H N i 0 0 0 0 H · · '~ . o o ~ O~U~I',)OOOOOO..,IO~U~O~0(.nOI',)t..~oLno~o H ~0~~ ~ o~ ~0 N 000~ 0 N NNNNNN ZO~ 0 X N 0 000~ HHH~ 000~ ~H 0 N ~H ~n 0~ H ~ ~ H ~ ~ 0 HH 0000 0000000 0000 ~ 00~00 000 NNN ooo ooo . . . , o o o~o~ o~oo~o ~00000 OOOOOO OOOOO0 0OOO00 OOOOOO H (J1 (~ 0 (~ 0 ~ ~ , o o ~ ~ o~0~ Z~ Z Z ZZ H~ ~ H H~ ~ ~ ~ ~HH < He: ooo ooo 0HH 0~ Z 0~ OHH ~ ~ ~ Z HH ~ H H H ~ OO O 0 O~ OO O0 ~ O O O ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ o o ~ ~o ~ oo o ~ o ooo ..... 0 ..... N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~0 0 ~ ~ W~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ O0 0 0 000 0 O0 ~ 0 0 0 C 0 O~ 0 0 000 0 O0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0~ 0 0 000 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 000 ~ O0 O0 0 0 0 o~ o~ o~ ooo ooo ooo oooooo ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~H ~ o ~ ooo ~ o~ · OOOOOO O O O O OO O O OOO OOOOOO O O O O OO O O OOO OOOOOO O O O O OO O O OOO ~H~ O ~ ~ ~ OO O O OOO O0 O0 O0 0 0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 0 0 ~0 , m m N N 0 ~ ~~ ~ 0 0  H H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H Z ~ ~ ~ HZ OH ~ ~ H Z ~ H H~ Z Z ~ ~ qN ~ ~ n n H ~ n N N X ~ x x X X ~ ~ H n O ~ ~ H W ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ ~ ~ 0 H O ~ 0~0~ 0 0 0 O0 OH HH ~ 0 C ~ 0 W ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 000~ 0 0 0 O0 O~ O0 0 0 Z 0 ~ ~ O0 0 0 O H ~ O 0 ~0~O O 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ H 0 O ~ ~ ~ ~ O 0 ~ ~ .~.~ 0 ~ ~ O0 O0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ....... O. O ....... ~ N O O O0 ~ ~ 0 0 O ~ ~ 0 0 W 0 O O0 O~ OO 0 C .o , , , .. .o .. ~ 0 0 o0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 O0 o0 O0 0 ~ 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o ~ 0 0 OO o0 o0 0 0 0 ~0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 o0 O0 O0 0 ~ H ~0 n ~ ~ 0 H H H HH H H H H H H H HHHH H H H HH HH NH H ~ 0 0 0 O0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 O0 O 0 O 0 0 O O O000 0 O 0 O0 O0 0 0 O OO O O O O O O O OOOO O O 0 OO OO 0 i ~ < o . N ',. o~] O0 o 0 ~ C oo o 0 H X O0 o O Z H ~ 0 O ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ HHHNNHHHNNNHHHNNNHHHNNHH ~ ~ ~ 0 Z HHHHHNNHHHHH~ H~ H ~ ~0 ZZZZZZ~ZZZZZ Z~ZZ~ ~ 000000000000000000000000 ~ X X ~ 0~0~0000~0000~0000000 0 O~O0~O0000~OOOO~O000000 0 ~~0~0~0~00~~0 ~ ~O0~O000O~O000~O~O0000 0 0~0~~0~~0~0~~ 0 ,,,..,.....,...,.0...,0. , 000000000000000000000000 ~ .....,..0...0....0,...0. 000000000000000000000000 ~ 000000000000000000000000 ~ 000000000000000000000000 ~ 0 ~00000000000 0000 0 0 0 000000000000 0000 0 0 0 ~~00000 ~00 0 0 0 000000000000 0000 0 0 ~ ~00~0~ 0~0 ~ ~ 0 0000~0~0 ~OO~ O 0 .......... ..... . 0 000000000000 0000 0 0 0 000000000000 0000 0 0 0 0~0000000000 0~0 0 0 N o 0 ~ o o 000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 000000000000 0000 0 0 000000000000 0000 0 0 000000000000 0000 0 0 (D(D (DO) O0 O0 O0 O~ 0 < o . Q ~H OH ~o 000000000000000000000000000~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHH' HHHNHHHHHNNH~ 0 <0 N ~ ~ on 000000 ~ ~ <<<<<< n NNNHHH ~ NNNNNN 000000000000000000000000000 00000~00~00000000000~000000 O0000~WO0~O~O~O~O00000 ~M~O00~O000MO~O~O~~ 000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 0 HHHHHHHHHHH~ 0 00~0000000~ ~0~00~ O~O00~WO0~ ~00~00~0 00000000000~ 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 ~ 0 ~ ~0~ ~ ~~ Z M 000000 ~ h ~ Hh H H H ~ OO O OO OO O OO~O C OO O OO OO O ~OOO~O ~ oo ~ o~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ooo~ .. ~ .~ ~ o o~o ~ oo o ......... N o o oo o oooooo C o o oo o oooooo ~ o o oo o oooooo o ~ oo o oooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ~~~~H~ooooooooo ~~oooooooooo~~~ XXXXXXXXXXXX O000000OO000 000000000000 IIIIIIIIIIII 000000000000 000000000000 O0 0 O0 O0 0 000000 O0 0 O0 O0 0 000000 O0 0 O0 O0 0 000000 0 I ~ < o , N ~ o~] ~~o N 0 qZ ~ H ~ ~ o mmmmn ~ < o~ 0000000000000000000000~ ~ C ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~ D 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 c < N ~ o ~o~o~ ~~ ~ ~ o O o ~O~ 0~ ~ o 0 0 o ~ o~ 0~ ~ o 0 Z~~ Z~Z Z Z m ooou~ ~ q ~H~ C C Z ~HHH~H~H~~ 000~' ~ ~ ~ H H ZZZ,~ H H H ~z ~ ~ n . H U 0 ~ ~~ 0000 0 ~ 0 0 0 00000 0000 0 0 0 ,,,,, ,,.. ~ ~ ~000 0~0~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~00 W~ 0 ~ . 00~ 0.©. ' D ~ 00000 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 unmnnnmn HHHHHHH O0~0~ O00OOOO ,,,,... 0~0o~o ~00~ ..,..,, 0ooo000 ..,..,. oooo000 oo00ooo ooooooo 0000000000000000000000 ~ ~ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ 000~00~0000~00000~00~0 ~ ~O0~HO0000~O0000~O~ OW~OO~~~WO~O0 ~ ...... .... .., .... .,..' n o0ooooooo000oooo000ooo C 000OOOO00OOOOOOOOOOOOO ~ OOOOOOOOOO000OOOOOO000 OOOOOOO000OOOOOOOOOOOO 0 0 00000 0000 0 0 0 00000 0000 0 0 0 00000 HHHH ~ W ~ 00000 ~W ~ 0000000 0000000 0000000 0~~ 0000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 , < Z Z 0 oo~ ~ 0 ~0 ~ Z 0 ~. H 0 ~ H~ ~ H~ 0 OZ HZ ~ ~ ~ ~H ~0 ~0 ~ 0 "H 0 0 0 t~ ZOO00 0000 0000 H~ ~C~HZHHHHHHH ~ H~H ~00000~0~0~00 0000000~0000~00 ~00~0~000~~ ~0~~0~00000 00000000~0000000 0~00000000000000 0~00000000000000 000~00~000000000 ~ o 0~ . Ln 0 .3 0 0 I'o N N 0~ 0 HH 0 o Z o ~ Z N ~ 0 H oooo oooo oooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooo o HH I, oo HH I I I.,.11.0 o,~, oo~ I I oo N U m 6o ,~ 0 O~ t~ 0 0 01 0 I b~ 0 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 H O0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ H O0 0 0 i ~ < o . N o~] C 0 ~ ~ "~ U~ H H U000 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ooo ~ H ~ X~ Z z H. ooo C u ooo Z ooo ~ ooo ~ 0 ooo C 0oo ~ ooo OO o o oo o o oo h o ~ ,,~ o 0 ~ ~ < o . ~ \ o~ ~ H ~0 0oo ~ C 000 H X HHH ~ H ITEM NO. 6b DATE February. 21, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS MADE DURING THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 1995 Payments made in the month of December 1995 included a special payroll run for the period of 12/17/95 through 12/30/95. This special run was for final payment to retiring employees and was inadvertently omitted from the regular disbursement report for December 1995, submitted in January 1996. Payroll check numbers: 63260 to 63267 This report is submitted in accordance with Ukiah City Code Division 1, Chapter 7, Article 1. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Additional Report of Disbursements for the month of December 1995. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Candace Horsley, City Manager ,, ~ Prepared by: Gordon Elton, Director of Finance~/~ Coordinated with: Kimberly Sechrest, Accounts Payable Specialist Attachments: Report of Disbursements APPROVED: ~ ~~q'~~ Candace Horsley, C~y Manager AGENDA l.WPD/krs CITY OF UKIAH ADDITIONAL REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS REGISTER OF PAYROLL PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 1995 FUNDS: 100 120 150 141 142 200 220 230 260 300 312 320 332 335 405 410 550 575 600 618 611 612 620 652 660 General Fund Capital Improvement Civic Center Construction Museum Grants National Science Foundation Asset Seizure Fund Parking Dist. Rev. Fund Parking Dist. #1 Rev. Fund Downtown Business Improv. Gas Tax Airport Master Plan Grant Airport Clear Zone Fund Federal Emergency Grant Comm. Dev. Comm. Fund Youth Services Ukiah Conference Center Fund Lake Mendocino Bond Garage Airport Flood Damages Sewer Construction Fund City/District Sewer Special Sewer Fund (Cap Imp) Redip. Sewer Enterprise Fund Sanit. Disp. Site 662 663 665 670 675 678 680 693 695 696 697 698 8OO 8O5 820 920 910 900 940 950 960 962 965 966 310 JPA/LTF Fund Countywide JPA Refuse/Debris Control U.S.W. Billing & Collections Contracted Dispatch Services Public Safety Dispatch Ambulance Service Clubhouse Renovations Golf Warehouse/Stores Billing Enterprise Fund Fixed Asset Fund Electric Street Lights Water Liability Fund Worker's Comp. Fund Special Deposit Trust Payroll Posting Fund General Service Community Redev. Agency Redev. Housing Fund Redev. Capitol Imprv. Fund Redevelopment Debt Svc. Special Aviation Fund PAYROLL CHECKS NO. 63260 through 63267(Special Run) PAYROLL PERIOD 12/17/95 to 12/30/95 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS PAYROLL DED. CHECKS PAYROLL CHECKS TOTALPAYMENTS CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK This register of Payroll and Demand Payments was duly approved by the City Council on $0.00 $7,561.76 $15,510.69 $23,072.45 City Clerk APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER I have examined this Register and approve same. City Manager CERTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I have audited this Register and approve same for accuracy and available funds. Director of Finance ITEM NO. 6c. DATE: February_ 21, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Deny Claim for Damages Received from Robert Levy, and Refer to City Insurance Carrier REMIF The claim from Robert Levy was received on January 29, 1996, for alleged damages to residence VCR and Phone from electrical power outages from December storms. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Deny Claim for Damages Received from Robert Levy, and Refer to City Insurance Carrier REMIF ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Alternative action not advised by City Risk Manager. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted)' N/A Acct. No. N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Claimants _ ,] Prepared by: Cathy McKay, City Clerk (.~.,[~"'Ia,1/~ ~ Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Mana,er Attachments: Claim o~bert Levy Candace Ho~-sley, (~ity ~'lanager NOTICE OF CLAIM AGAINST ~ CITY OF UKiAH~ CALIFO~ This claim must be presented, as prescribed by Parts 3 and 4 of Division 3.6, of Title 1, of the ~overnment Code of the State of California, by the claimant or by a person acting on his/her behalf. RETURN TO: City Clerk's Office City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 i · · Number/Street and Post office Box City State Home Phone Number Zip Code ~6.~- z-?Po Work Phone Number · NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM NOTICES REGARDING THIS CLAIM SHOULD BE .SENT (if different than above): · · · · · · ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE:~//~/,~ ~ ~ ~-~,,//,-~ (/~ -'- P~OE OF THE ACCIDENT OR OOOO~ENOE. GENE~L DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT OR OCC~ENCE (Attach additional pages if more space is needed): ~~_ ~~. NgZ~, IF KNO~, OF ~ }UBLIC EMPLOYEES CAOSINg THE INJURY OR ~oss: NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF WITNESSES (optional): NAME ADDRESS A. TELEPHONE Be NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF DOCTORS/HOSPITALS WHERE TREATED: NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE A. Be 10. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LOSS, INJURY, OR DAMAGE SUFFERED: / / / / 11. 12. TOTAL AMOUNT CLAIMED: THE BASIS OF COMPUTING THE TOTAL AMOUNT CLAIMED IS AS FOLLOWS: Damages incurred to date: E.~penses for medical/hospital care: Loss of earnings: Special damages for: General damages Estimated prospective damages as far as known: Future expenses for medical and hospital care: Future loss of earnings: Other prospective special damages: Prospective. general damages: The claim shall be signed by the claimant or by some person on his/her behalf. A claim relating to a cause of action for death or for injury to the person or to personal property or growing crops shall be presented not later than six (6) calendar months or 182 days after the accrual of the cause of action, whichever is longer. Claims relating to any other causes of action shall be presented not later than one (1) year after accrual of the cause of action. DATED: S i GNATURE~/CLAIMANT (S) Received in city Clerk's Office this ~~ day of 19~. SIGNA~U E // ? This form of claim is for your convenience only, an~ any other type of NOTE: form may be used if desired, so long as it satisfies the requirements of the Government Code. The use of this form is not intended in any way to advise you of your legal rights or to interpret any law. If you are in doubt regarding your legal rights or the interpretation of any law, we suggest that you seek legal counseling of your choice. 3:FORM~CLAIM Rev: 3/10195 CRAWFORD'S VCR r'IE. PAIFt /-- ':~.-- 28 SO U'TH STA TE, TREET .~F,~,, =i ~ L.,/_.,...../:_... UKIAFt, CALIFORNIA 95482 r-.O/llVlR/l~. __.~/ ~ ,~.ImReg.NO. Telephone (707)468,1371 / --,. ~.~ ~-,///% t70765 iL:> c::,' ,, IHf ()lr'(')5~IrD PnoPl~m~' b~ ,% ~. I$ NOT : .... ..:..' ' :'" ~ ': ..... o ~ : ......... /L~tt' y ~.- ' 't ,~, ~ ............. SERVICE CALL, SHOP ~BOR, REMOVAL, CLOSER S~4~P ANAt. YSIS ADDITIONAL REPAIRS ARE NEEDED YOU W~LL BE CONTACTED r:OR 't ..... ' ~-' * % ' ~' J ' C~T~[R S , SIGNATUaE X 30 DAY LABOR. IJ0 DAY PARTS GLJARANTE[;D ON ALL WORK PERFORlYRED Item No. fid Date: February. 21.1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Approval of Notice of Completion, Relative to Contract for Construction of Steel Water Storage Tank. REPORT: Council authorized the award of contract for the construction of a steel water storage tank, to Peabody Tec Tank. The contractor completed the work on January 22, 1996 and the tank was placed in service on January 27, 1996. The total cost of the project was $21,815. The work was completed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department. The system was tested and performed as required by the specifications, RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the work as complete and direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion for Construction of the Steel Water Storage Tank. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Reject Acceptance of Completion of the Steel Water Storage Tank. Acct. No. (If not budgeted): Acct. No. (if budgeted) Appropriation Request: Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities f~,~"/~4~u~..--/ Prepared by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, Acting City Manager Attachment: 1) Construction Photos ITEM NO. 6e MEETING DATE: Feb. 21, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION TO COUNCIL REGARDING PURCHASE OF LIQUID POLYMER PRODUCT Liquid polymer is used to aid the filtering of the water at the water treatment plant. One of the goals of the current budget is to maximize the efficiency of the water treatment process by using the most efficient polymers. For the past few months and with permission from the Department of Health Services, staff has tried several liquid polymers under various conditions with good results. Requests for Quotations through the informal bid process were sent to four suppliers. The bids were opened by the Purchasing Department on January 24, 1996. Two bids were returned and evaluated by staff. The Iow bidder is N.T.U. Technologies with a total bid of $7,132.13. A purchase order has been issued to N.T.U. Technologies. Based on our purchasing policies, we are giving the City Council the required notification of this action. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive report regarding the purchase of liquid polymer product. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Acct. No. (if not budgeted): Acct. No.: 820-3908-520 Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A ~ Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities ~. ~ Prepared by' George Borecky, Water/Sewer Operations Superintendent Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Nora Kennedy, Purchasing and Warehouse Supervisor Attachments: 1. Bid Tabulation 2. Excerpt from adopted budget Candace Horsley,! City Manager E c) C i I i i i I I i ! ! i ! 0 E 0 0 '-- 0 0 o 0 0 .,..; -.~ o~- c-- {D ~ 0 ~' ~ ..-~ 0 '~ CC ~m EOE 0-5 c E oo ~Ecg ~c DE ~o 0 0'--C -- >~ E~E> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ITEM NO. 6f DATE: February 21, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE AUDIT REPORT FOR JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1994 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDS For the City Council's information, we are forwarding for your review the Audit Report relative to the Transportation Development Act Funds and Sudace Transportation Program Funds, as prepared by V. James Sligh, CPA. These monies are administered through the Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG). The report is straightforward, and staff is available to answer any questions Council might have relative to the audit. As stated in the report, staff is implementing separate accounts. Receipt and filing of the report by the Council is requested. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council receive and file Auditor's Report relative to Transportation Development Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds for June 30, 1995 and 1994 ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Review reports in detail and transmit comments to MCOG. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: MCOG Prepared by: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Transmittal letter, dated February 7, Governments 1996, from Mendocino Council of APP ~ ~ Candace Horsier;, ~ty/Manager 4/CM:ASRMCOG men'ooctno council oF c ove ncs m~nbocmo co.tm~y cou~,~ouse uk~xh, CaL~FO~m 954 8 2.. (?0714 6 ~-4 4"10 February 7, 1996 TO: City of Fort Bragg City of Willits C~ of Ukiah City of Point Arena County Department of Public Works ~'~ FM: Mary Hiatt, MCOG Executive Secretary RE: Transmittal of Fiscal Audits Year End Jude 30, 1995 Enclosed, please find, copies of the audit for your particular agency as prepared by James Sligh, CPA. Any questions concerning these reports may be discussed with myself or Mr. James Sligh. Thanks in advance. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROSRAM FUNDS AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1994 CITY OF UKIAH TRANSPORTATION DEVEID~ ACT FUNDS AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROSRAM FUNDS TABLE OF ~ 1 Auditor's Report ............................ Financial Statements . 2 Balance Sheet ..... ~i~, ................ Statement of Revenues, and Changes in Fund Balance ................... 3 Notes to Financial Statements ...................... 4 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with laws and Regulations Based on an Audit of Fim~ncial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditinq Standards ......................... · 5-6 Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Structure Related Matters Noted in a Financial Statement Audit Conducted in Accordance with Gove~t Auditin~ Standards ..................... 7-8 V. James Sligh Certified Public Accountant 215 West Standley St. P.O. Box 333 Ukiah, CA 95482 Tel. & Fax (707) 462-8635 ~ENT AUDITOR' S REPORT city C~il City of Uki~ 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California I have audited the financial statements of the City of Ukiah Transportation Devel~t Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds as of and for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994, as listed in the table of contents. ~nese financial statements are the responsibility of the city's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit. I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditinq Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the anxmants and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion. In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City of Ukiah Transportation DeveloIm~t Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds as of June 30, 1994 and 1995, and the results of those fund's operations for the years then ended in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Govelnnmnt Auditinq Standards, I have also issued a report dated October 13, 1995, on my consideration of the City's internal control structure and a report dated October 13, 1995, on its complian~ with laws and regulations of the Transportation Devel~t Act and the provisions of State of California SB 1435 as it relates to allowed uses of Surface Transportation Vo Ukiah, California October 13, 1995 CITY OF UKIAH TRANSPORTATION DEVELO~ ACT FUNDS AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDS JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1994 1995 1994 Cash ASSETS $ 103,120 $ 103,120 Total Assets $ 103,120 $ 103,120 T,TABI~~ i~qD ~ ~CE FUnd Balance: Reserved for Streets / Roads Reserved for Article 19 Uses Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 60,452 $ 60,452 42,668 42,668 103,120 103,120 $ 103,120 $ 103,120 The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements TRANSPORTATION DEVELO~ ACT FUNDS AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDS STA~ OF ~, EXPEND~ AND CHANGES IN FUND BAIANCE FOR 7~HE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1994 1995 1994 Revenues: Local Transportation Fund - Streets / Roads Surface Transportation Program Fund - Article 19 Uses Total Revenues Expenditures - Pedestrian / Bicycle Streets / Roads Article 19 Uses Excess (Deficit) of Revenues Over Expenditures Fund Balance-Beginning of Year Fund Balance-End of Year -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 103,120 $ 103,120 -0- 42,668 42,668 -0- 42,668 60,452 $ 103,120 The Accompany~ Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements CITY OF UKIAH TRANSPORTATION ~PMENT ACT FUNDS AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ~ FtlNDS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STAT~4ENTS JUNE 30, 1995 AND 1994 Sunmmry of Siqnificant Accountinq Policies General Under Article 8 and Article 3 of the Public Utilities Code, Division 10, Part 88, Chapter 4, the Mendocino Council of Gov~ts may allocate funds to the City for local streets and roads or pedestrian and bicycle expenditures. These funds must be expended according to the Council's instructions. In addition, Surface Transportation Program Funds that arise from federal gas taxes that are passed through the State of California must be allocated to projects nominated by entities (cities, counties, operators) in the County of Mendocino, in accordance with California Streets and Highways Code Section 182.6 (d) (1) (added by SB 1435, C~apter 1177). These financial statements report only the activity of the City of Ukiah that is directly related to Article 8 and Article 3 allocations, and the provisions of SB 1435 as they relate to Surface Transportation Program Funds. Basis of Accountinq Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures or expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. All governmental funds are accounted for using the mcdified accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. V. James Sligh Cp. rlifi~d Public ^ccountanl 215 West Slandley St. P.O. Box 333 Ukieh, CA 95482 Tel. & Fax (707) 462-8635 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRU~ REIATED MA~ NOTED IN A FINANCIAL STA~ AUDIT CONE~~ IN ACOO~CE TO the city Council City of Ukiah, California I have audited the financial statements of the city of Ukiah Transportation Development Act Funds and Surface TransporJ~tion Program Funds as of and for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994, and have issued my report thereon dated October 13, 1995. I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Governments Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Tnose standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The management of the city of Ukiah (City) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate. In planning and performing my audit of the financial statements of the City for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994, I obtained an understanding of the internal control stru~. With respect to the internal control structure, I obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and whether they have been placed in operation, and I assessed control risk for the purpose of expressing my opinion on the financial statements and not to provide an opinion on the internal control structure. Accordingly, I do not express such an opinion. My consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. I noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that I consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. This report is intended for the information of management and the m~mbers of the city Council. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. V. James Sligh, CPA Ukiah, California October 13, 1995 V. James Sligh Codified Public Accounlan! 215 West Standley St. P.O. Box 333 Uklah, CA 95482 Tel. & Fax (707) 462-8635 ~ A33DITOR'S REI4DRr ON OOMPT.TANCE ~ IAWS AND RBGUIATIONS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATBMENTS PERDgD~ED IN ACO0~CE WITH To the City Council City of Ukiah, California I have audited the financial statements of the City of Ukiah Transportation Development Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds as of and for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994, and have issued my report thereon dated October 13, 1995. I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditinq Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reaso_rk~_ble assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Complianc~ with laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to the City of Ukiah Transportation Development Act Funds and Surface Transportation Program Funds is the responsibility of the management of the City of Ukiah. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the firk3r~ial statements are free of material misstatement, I performed tests of the City's compli~ with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the objective of my audit of the financial statements was not to provide an opinion on overall compliance with such provisions. Accordingly, I do not express such an opinion. Material instances of noncompliance consist of failures to follow requirements, or violations of prohibitions, contained in statutes, regulations, contracts, or grants, that cause me to conclude that the aggregation of the misstatements resulting from those failures or violations is material to the financial statements. The results of my tests of compliance disclosed the following material instance of noncompliance. Transportation Development Act Funds comminqled with funds from other sources - As required by Section 6666 (b) of the California Code of Regulations, each claimant for Transportation Development Act FUnds must comply with applicable rules, recjulations, and procedures of the transpo~tion planning agency (Mendocino Council of Governments) and with the allocation instructions. Instructions for prior year allocations of streets and roads funds from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance Fund (STA) indicated that LTF and STA funds must be deposited in, and spent from, a restricted account that is easily identified for the indicated purposes, and is easily auditable. Compliance testing for the current year ended June 30, 1995, revealed that prior year allocations of LTF and STA funds ($60,452) were combined with Surface Transportation ~ funds ($42,668) and funds frc~ other sources ($16,935). In addition, the indicated ~e for these funds in the financial records of the City of Ukiah was entirely different than the original stated purpose. The Director of Finance for the City of Ukiah has indicated that new accounts for the purpose of separating the funds mentioned above will be established, and that revised pu/ixDses for the LTF and STA funds will be communicated to MODG for approval. Except for the material item noted above, the results of my tests of compliance disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Except for the material item noted above, with respect to the items tested, funds allocated to, and received by, the City of Ukiah pursuant to the State of California Transpo~tion Develotm~t Act (Act) and the California SB 1435 for Surface Transportation Program Funds, were expended in conformance with the applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the Act, SB 1435, and the allocation instructions and resolutions of the Mendocino Council of Governments. This report is intended for the information of manag~t and the members of the City Council. However, This report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. V. Ukiah, California October 13, 1995 ITEM NO. 6g DATE: February 21, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE 1996-97 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR PERSONNEL/RISK MANAGEMENT AND SECRETARIAL POOL DIVISIONS Due to time constraints, the Goals and Objectives for the Personnel/Risk Management Division and Secretarial Pool Division were not discussed during the January 30, 1996 Goal Setting Session. Since discussions of these two units are usually very straightforward, we are placing this under Consent Calendar for the Council to receive and file the draft Goals and Objectives. If you have any questions please feel free to pull this item from the Consent Calendar for discussion, or provide your comments to the Budget team prior to completion of the final Draft Budget. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council receive and file draft Goals and Objectives for Personnel/Risk Management Division and Secretarial Pool Division. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Discuss Goals and Objectives in detail and provide direction to staff. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Prepared by: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Goals and Objectives for Personnel/Risk Management 2. Goals and Objectives for Secretarial Pool APPROVED: 4/Ca,:^SR~ C"~h'~dace Horsley, ~it! Manager o.~. '-'- 0 0 i m !11 Z °.8 oO:~ ~. 8 ?~-8 ~~ ~ o~ --I · Item No. 6h Date: February_ 21. 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Authorize Payment for Emergency River Bank Repair to Mendocino Construction in the Amount of $ 89,243.64. REPORT: As a result of water releases from the last storm, the levee banks along the river suffered significant damage in several locations. I was called to the treatment plant on Saturday January 27, 1996. The levee bank holding pond #2 had been washed out to a point half way through the road. Due to the large amount of inflow to the plant two ponds were completely full and the third was half full. It appeared that with the current rate of erosion the levee would breach by that evening. If these levees had failed, treated wastewater would have been spilled uncontrolled into the Russian River. I felt that immediate action was required to stabilize the worst of the areas with city personnel and personnel from Mendocino Construction Services, who were on site to give assistance. On Monday January 29, 1996, facing the possibility of another severe storm, we were granted permission for emergency discharge to the river in order to reduce the level of the ponds. I authorized Mendocino Construction Services to gravel the levee top for a haul road, since the roads were too soft to hold fully loaded trucks without getting stuck, and rip rap the remaining areas of concern. ( Continued page 2 ) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize Payment in the Amount of $89,243.64 to Mendocino Construction Services for Emergency Repairs from Account 612-3980-250. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Deny Authorization and Budget Adjustment and Direct Staff as to Alternatives. Acct. No. (If not budgeted):612-3580-250 Acct. No. (if budgeted) Appropriation Request: Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Prepared by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachment:l) Invoice APPROVED:~ ~~., Candace Hors e'r~', Ci~ty Manager / Page 2 Mendocino Construction was chosen to help on this emergency because they are the contractor on the river repair project and had the necessary equipment and material, some on site, to make the repairs. The Office of Emergency Services and FEMA were notified and were onsite to assess the damages. Work placing rip rap on the worst areas was completed on February 2, 1996. The total cost of this work was $ 89,243.64. This work would be paid from the Treatment Plant operating budget in order to preserve the current Purchase Order to complete the contracted repair work. A Budget adjustment has been authorized by the City Manager. The Sludge Removal in account 612-3580-690 will not be completed during this fiscal year. Representatives of FEMA indicated that this work could be covered under a pollution prevention fund since the work was required to prevent the spill of wastewater into the Russian River. The work done under this emergency will be utilized as a base for the final repairs that are currently contracted for completion. ii MENDOCINO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. P.O. Box 151 7, Willits, California 95490 Con. Lic. #443396 (707) 459-2377 C~ty of Uk~ah 300 Seminary Uk~ah, Ca. 95482 Inv. Dale: 2/~ Dale 1/27/96 1/29/96 1/30/96 1/31/96 2/Ol/96 2/o2/96 9/96 ! , RiverBank Stabilization Emergency Protection Saturday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Amount Due 24,820. 21,648 26,060 13,236. 1,815 TERMS: Net Cash Interest will be charged at 11/2% per month (18% annually) on past due accounts. Contract No. Unit Price Amount 1,661 4~ 6~ $ 89,24:64 CITY/DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION - FUND #612 Budgeted amounts: Beginning fund balance 7/1/95 Revenue budgeted Transfers budgeted In (Out) Expenses budgeted Budgeted ending fund balance 6/30/96 $ 344,893 $ 2,26O,844 $ (147,573) $(1,667,451) $ 790,713 Adjustments made during the fiscal year: Date Approved Account No. lO/18/95 Transfer in for River Bank Repair 612.281.620 lO/18/95 Transfer in for River Bank Repair 612.281.650 lO/18/95 River Bank Repair- Mendocino Construction Services 612.3580.250.000 2/21/96 ProEmergency River Bank Repair- Mendocino Const Svcs 612.3580.250.000 $ 144,520 $ 109,962 $ (254,482) $ (89,244) Revised ending fund balance 6/30/96 $ 701,469 RESERVES.XLS 2/15/96 Page 1 Fund 612 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT AUTHORIZATION TO: Director of Finance DATE: February 15, 1996 Please adjust the budget for the amount(s) as shown below: From To Account No. Amount Account No. Amount 612.3580.690.000 $ 89,244.00 612.3580.250.000 $ 89,244.00 Justification: EmerRenc¥ repair work to the river bank at the ponds because of storm damaqe. Budeeted slud.qe removal not anticipated to be completed this fiscal year. BY: Department Head APPROVED: City Manager Approval of City Manager required for transfers within Department Budgets. APPROVED: Mayor Council approval required between Department or Fund Budgets. ~ 0 o ~ AI-rRA to be funded by revamped USDA in FY96 ATI'RA in 1996 will be funded by the recently revamped U.S. Department of Agriculture, but its mission to provide the latest information about sustainable agriculture to professional agriculturists will remain unchanged. Also, ATTRA will continue to operate from offices at the landgrant University of Arkansas at Fayetteville with the same toll-free Cooperative Services In February, ATTRA will be included in the USDA's Rural Business - Cooperative Service (RBS). More specifically, ATTRA will work with the Cooperative Services Program of the RBS, which along with two other major programs is part of the USDA's Rural Economic and Community Develop- ment (RECD) program. RECD role The USDA/RECD was created during the 1994 reorganiza- tion of the USDA, as the USDA consolidated rural economic programs which had previously been scattered among various agendes. The Farmers Home Administration, Rural Development Administ~tion, Rural Electrification Adminis- tration and Agriculture Cooperative Service were discontin- ued, with their roles passed to the RECD. To serve the 61 million people living in U.S. rural areas 40% of whom have incomes that dassify them below the "The fact that both ATERA and Coopera- tive Services serve a farm-oriented clientele that is thirsty for info on how to farm and market more effec- tively certainly makes them a good fit." -- Randall Torger~on, Deputy Administrator, Cooperative Services in rural revitalization. federal poverty level -- RECD funds projects and provides technical assistance to create quality business opportunities, jobs, services, housing and utilities in rural communities. The RECD recognizes that the federal government cannot by itself solve the problems facing rural America. So, it attempts to influence and motivate others t such as state, local and tribal governments, private and non- profit organizations, and user- owned cooperatives ~ to engage RECD programs are administered through three rural development services: the Rural Business - Cooperative Service, the Rural Utilities Service and the Rural Housing (See USDA page 4) ATTRA survives Congressional ATTRA will continue to serve as a national provider of sustainable agriculture information in FY96, thanks in large part to the efforts of its many friends in the agricultural sector, Congress and the Clinton Administration. On September 28 after a /ATIRA bids ad~u to U.S. F~h & WldlJfe Sewice funci~g cliO'hanger and a J0the susta~able ag programs fundecl flurry of activity ~'~e sf0des inskle by ATrRA supporters, the Congressional Joint Conference Agricultural Appropriations Committee approved funding to keep ATTRA alive in FY96. Prospects for ATTRA's survival looked glum last June when the U.S. House of Representatives in its markup of the 1996 federal budget offered words of praise for ATTRA but zeroed out FY96 funding. Soon after that development was reported in the September issue of ATFRAnews, ATTRA supporters and sustainable agriculture organizations launched a call-in effort to repre- sentatives and senators in key states. Action alerts were issued by the Campaign for Sustainable Agriculture, the National Family Farm Coalition and others. In mid-September, Senators J. Robert Kerrey (NE) and Friends help secure "'~'"' '"'~ program's FY96 funding Herb Kohl (WI), with strong support from Senator Dale Bumpers (AR), introduced an amendment to transfer $2.3 million of USDA rural development funds to a category which included ATTRA and the Rural Technology and Cooperative Development Grants Program (RTCDGP). The Senate Appropriations Committee approved the amendment containing language recommending "up to $1.3 million for ATTRA." ~ Finally on Sept. 28, wi~ broad bipartisan support, the Joint Conference Agricultural Appropriations Committee ap- proved the bill containing the Kerry-Kohl amendment. Other Congressmen backing the bill'were Jay Dickey (AR), Richard Durbin (IL), Marcy Kaptur (OH), Frank Riggs (CA), Ray Thornton (AR) and James Walsh (NY), and Senators Conrad Burns (MT), Thad Cochran (MS), Tom I-larkin (IA), Arlen Specter (PA), and others. ATTRA is now working with (See Funding page 4) New hmlicullure publications ......... 2 ATTRA plans b==: wod(shops. .......... 2 Project manage's notes ................... 3 Renew America conference set .... 3 New ATTRA matedals ....................... ~ ATTRA horticulturists create new publications on "hot" U.S. ag topibs 'Current Topics' enable staffers fo respond quickly to info requests Hort staff also revamps other pubs on topics of current Interest ATFRA's horticulture staff members have created some new publications about topics which are currently receiving a great deal of discussion in U.S. farm cirdes. Requests for informa- tion an the topics has increased sharply at ATTRA. "The new Current Topics publications will enable us to respond quickly with condse, detailed information about the topics which are of growing interest to our users," ATTRA Technical Spedalist Rex Dufour says. As with other ATTRA standard materials, Current Topics will be mailed within 48 hours of a caller's request. In addition to the new publications, ATTRA horticulturists have also revised several other publications on topics ~ current interest to the farm sector. A1TRA users may order any of the following new and revised materials, which are: ~'Current Topics Albrecht-Reams Bio.lo,cai Fertility Systere4 Alternative Nematode Control ~ Bananas: Organic Production Citrus: Organic Production Farmscaping Hard SquashY'Pumpkins, and Gourds: Organic Production Organic Sweet Corn Production Organic Tomato Production Pawpaw Production ' Radionics in Agriculture Sustainable Fireant Management ~2nformation Packages Field-Grown Cut and Dried Flowers Herb Production and Marketing Hydroponic Vegetable Production Integrated Pest Management Organic Greenhouse Vegetable Production Organic/Low-Spray Apple Production Sustainable Pecan Production ~Other Topics Aquaponics Bedding Plants Chestnuts Flare, Weeding Greenhouse Herbs Living Mulches ,Luebke Compostin~ ~ Permaculture Specialty Vegetables Wildtlower propagation Woody Ornamentals AI-rRA plans series of' beef workshops A~ is planning a series of workshops around the U.S. to help cattle produc- ers survive the tough times ahead. The first workshop, titled "Complementary Beef Management an Pasture" and scheduled for April 16-18 at Fayetteville, AR, will concern beef production in the fescue belt. $imil_~r workshops featuring regianal experts will be held around the U.S., depending on reader interest. Surviving tough markets "The cattle industry has lagged behind other agricultural sectors in hosting programs on sustainablility but producers are hungry for the information," says workshop organizer Dr. Ron Morrow, former professor of animal sdences at the University of Missouri and co-organizer of grazing schools at the Forage Systems Research Center there. "Several years of diminishing cattle prices are forecast for U.S. producers, and so now more than ever they must adopt sustainable methods to become more competitive economically. The workshops will show producers how to become much more efficient at produdng cattle on pastures with decreased dependence an purchased inputs." Workshop speakers In addition to Morrow, other speakers at the April workshop will be Jim Gerrish, Valerie Tate and Fred Martz, researchers at the Forage Systems Research Center; A~ technical spedalists Preston Sullivan and Alice Beetz; Dr. Ann Wells, a veterinarian and sheep producer working in complementary animal health; and Stevie Forbes, beef cattle producer from Excelsior Springs, MO. Workshop sessions will center on employing a holistic approach to establish goals for the ranch and evaluate farm resources; soil resource evaluation; intensive grazing; pasture field exercises; landscape effects on grazing; plant species selection and pasture improvement; extending the grazing season; livestock nutrition needs on pasture; marketing and value-added products; sustainable health practices; water/fencing systems; and layout and design of graT. ir~g systems. Fees for the workshop are $250 for people registering before March 25 and $300 after that deadline. Readers interested in attending the Northwest Arkansas workshop or a beef production workshop in their area are asked to contact Preston Sullivan at ATrRA, P.O. Box 3657, Fayetteville, AR 72702, Telephone 1-800-346-9140, FAX (501) 442-9842, Internet email prestons@ncatfyv.~k, edu. 2 Sustainable ag programs receive FY96 gov't funding Following are FY96 levels for federally-backed U.S. sustainable ag programs: Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE): An $8.1 million appropriation, $12,000 less than the FY95 appropriatian. Sustainable Agriculture Technology Development and Transfer Program (SATDTP): A $3.4 million appropria- tion, down from last year's $35M. Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA): USDA will allocate neces- sary funds to maintain the program. Water Quality Incentive Program:(WQIP): An $11 million appropriation, a decrease from FY95's $15 million. Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP): A $77 million appropriation, a decrease from FY95's $93.2 million. Natural Resources Conservation Service GNRCS): A conservation operations appropriations of $629.9 million, an increase from the FY95 appropriation af $586.9 millian; overall appropriation is $859.4 million, an increase from FY95's $836.7. AI-rRA's work includes more than' answering I'm looking at a bar chart for the number of requests ATrRA has responded to between 1989-1995, and am espe- dally interested in the comparison between the 1994 and 1995 reporting years. Our staff completed more than 16,000 cases in 1995, a 25% increase over 1994. ATTRA's funding was the same in both years. I look back to 1989, when we completed a little more than 4000 requests, so that our current level of requests is quadruple that of the earlier years of the project. I feel proud of our staff who .:::i:i:! .... ================================================ worked together to allow us to respond to this continually increasing interest from the agricultural community. 1995 innovations A few of the tasks that contributed to a successful 1995 include: improving telephone reception, data entry and mailout; designing, writing, editing and publicizing new materials and newsletters; organizing and updating our library materials; improving our computer system perfor- mance and Internet access; keeping accounting and office operations working well; leading and guiding others. But requests or "cases" as we call them, are only one indica- tor of the ways in which ATTRA helps others. Our staff are information requests speakers, exhibitors and organizers of meetings and confer- ences where farmers, extensionists, researchers, agency personnel, information providers, agribusinesses and others benefit from learning about our service or about technical topics. We get many more requests for this kind of assistance than we have staff time and resources to respond to. Often we send materials and displays when we ourselves cannot attend. ATrRA is information conduit ATTRA also publicizes and recognizes the innovative work of organizations and farmers, researchers and educators, thereby spreading their impact and influence beyond what they may be able to do on their own. In addition to technical production-related questions, we have provided information to newsletter writers and other media seeking information on sustainable agriculture. My phone might ring at any time, and someone may ask me for contact infarmation for a person, group or project. Another staff member's phone may ring and a researcher or farmer who gave ATTRA infarma- tion on their latest work might now need a quick tip in identifying a resource THEY need. These and other linkages that we do as part of our daily work may never show up in the case statistics, but are still an impartant part of our contribution to the agricultural community. ATTRA staffers working on Renew America's "National Town Meeting" 60 U.S. cities facing environmental problems to be downlinked Several A~ staff members are helping to coordinate local host sites for a national video conference scheduled for Feb. 26 by Renew America, a national nonprofit founded in 1979 to help solve the country's most critical environmental problems. Renew America conducts the Environ- mental Success Index, the National Awards for Enviromental Sustainability, and the National Town Meeting. Video conference is Feb. 26 Titled "Environmentally Sustainable Communities: A National Town Meeting," the 90-minute, interactive video conference will downlink opinion makers with over 60 partici- pating U.S. cities which face common environmental problems. The town meeting is sponsored this year by AT&T and the U.S. Department of Energy and moderated by former CBS and CNN correspondent Deborah Potter. The National Center for Appropriate Technology -- which administers the ATI'RA project and many programs dealing with sustainable agriculture, low-income energy/housing issues and resource-effident housing -- is co-sponsoring community panel discussions for the video conference at Butte, MT, and Fayetteville, AR. National panelists National panelists for the video conference will include Henry Cisneros, Secretary of the U.S. Dept. of Housing; Christine Ervin, Assistant Secretary for Energy Effidency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy; David Brower, chairman of Earth Island Institute; A1 Weed, chairman of the Sustainable Economic Development Group, Thomas Jefferson Sustainability Council; and Emanuel Cleaver, Kansas City mayor. People Wishing to obtain further information or attend conference events at Fayetteville, AR, should contact Cynthia Arnold, ATTRA, P.O. Box 3657, Fayetteville, AR 72702, phone (501) 442-9824, fax ($01) 442-9842, email address cynthiaa@ncatfyv.uark, edu. Information about the Butte, MT, conference can be obtained from Jeff Birkby, National Center for Appropri- ate Technology, P.O. Box 3838, Butte, MT 59702, phone (406) 494-45~, fax (406) 494-2905, email address jbirkby~ncat, org. ATTRA bids adieu to Fish & Wildlife Service ATTRA will conclude a f~ui~ and enjoyable seven-year partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in February when it comes under auspices of the USDA. "We will miss working with the many good friends we made in the Service, but want them to know how much we appreciate the support and guidance they have provided since taking us under their wing in 1989," A~ Project Manager Teresa Maurer says. In addition to its work of providing information of benefit to the U.S. environment and wildlife, A~ helped the Fish and Wildlife Service with several specific projects. ATTRA specialists presented technical informa- tion at Service workshops and assisted refuge managers as they implemented IPM programs on their refuges. "We hope that Service personnel and their farmer cooperators will continue to call ATTRA for sustainable agricul- ture information in their important work of preserving wildlife populations and habitats," Maurer notes. "We have great expectations for our new home within USDA, but will always treasure our personable working relationship with F~sh and Wildlife." USDA (Continued from page 1) RBS enhances rural life The Rural Business - Cooperative Service works to enhance the quality of rural life by providing leadership in building competitive businesses and cooperatives that will prosper in the global marketplace. RBS encompasses the former Agricul- tural Cooperative Service and some of the business and economic programs of the former Rural Development Adminis- tration and Rural Electrification Admin- istration. RECD field offices administer RBS and other USDA rural development programs at the local level. ATTRA & RBS: Good combo. 'ATTRA's affiliation with RBS will be good for us and for the agency," says ATTRA Project Manager Teresa Maurer. One of RBS's mission goals is to: "Assist in the development of strategic, sustainable and environmentally semi- rive economic growth that meets the expressed needs of rural communities." ~nere are as many visions of the farming future, of course, as there are definitions of sustainablility...What I brought back from the mad, from the farm, are some exemplary tales from a few places where sustainable agricul- ture has taken hold and is promising to spread thro~ho~ the United States." - Author Verl~n l~ltnkenborg, "A Fl~tin~ R~volutiox~" National G~graphic, Decamber, 1~1)5 "We identify strongly with that mis- sion," ~ys Maurer, "and we look forward to our new relationship with the agency while continuing to serve farmers, ranchers and others involved in agriculture." Randall Torgerson, deputy administra- tor for Cooperative Services, also notes, "The fact that both ATTRA and Coopera- tive Services serve a farm-oriented clientele that is thirsty for information on how to farm and market more effectively certainly makes them a good fit. 'Aqith farm program changes resulting in a lower safety net, farmers and ranchers are pressed to find self-help solutions in marketing and more effec- tive means of sustainable production. Our joint programs address these critical needs," he says. Cooperative Services Pingram The Cooperative Services (CS) Program of the RBS helps rural residents to form new cooperative businesses and improve operations of existing co-ops. CS services range from an initial feasibility study to development of a business plan, including helping to identify sources of finandal assistance. It also carries out a program of research, .education and information on the cooperative method of doing business, and has over 100 publications under title. Ag marketing, farm supply and related service coopera- tives are its primary focus. Readers and cooperatives can obtain more information about CS by contacting USDA/RBS Cooperative Services, AG Box 3255, Washington, DC 20250-3255, phqn~ (202) 720-7558. Funding (Continued from page 1) USDA offidals to receive FY96 funding of $1.3 million. As ATTRA Project Manager Teresa Maurer notes, ATTRA caseload increased by 25% in FY95 and so the $1,3 million in funding would enable staffers to keep pace with antid- pated information requests in FY96. AITi~, a publication of Appropriate Tech- nology Transfer for Rural Areas, is mailed free of charge to ATI'RA friends and users. ATTRA disseminates information about sus- tainable agriculture and low-input farmin~ to U~q. farmers, agribusiness, Extension agents, wildlife professionals, and other in- terested people. A2'IItA is funded by a grant from the U~. Fish & Wildlife Service and is administered by the National Center for Ap- propriate Technology (NCAT), a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping eommlllli- ties and individuals find sustainable ways of improving the quality of]fie, using skills and resources at hand. Printed on reeyelmt paper Ai:~C~Nt~e Technolo~ TromfM Io( Md Arum P.O. Box ~7 FayM1e~lle, AR 72702 1-~00-~,6-9140 A project o/the Ncdlond CentM fo( Ai:~'o~ote Techn(Mo~y Er ic SunswheaL P.O. Box 363 PoLLer Valley, CA95469 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FOR RURAL AREAS P.O. Box 3657, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72702, (501) 442-9824,1-800-346-9140 February 17, 1995 Re: ATTRA 62361 Eric Sunswheat PO Box 363 Potter Valley, CA 95469 Mr. Sunswheat: Thank you for contacting ATTRA for information on Controlled Microbial Composting (C.M.C.) and humus management. C.M.C. compost is a humified compost that has been microbially inocUlated, aerated, and monitored to ensure high standards of quality. The C.M.C. method was developed through on-farm and laboratory research by Siegfried and Uta Luebke of Austria. Humus management is a system of soil management the Luebkes use in conjunction with C.M.C. compost. Each of these techniques are described below. The Luebke Family The Luebkes are well known in Europe and rapidly gaining a wider audience in the U.S.,.especially the Mid-Atlantic states, the Midwest, and in California. Siegfried and Uta Luebke were married some 30 years ago and have managed an organic vegetable and dairy sheep farm for about 25 years. Early on, they realized the importance of soil microorganisms in the management of agrfcultural soils. They gained insights from several people, including Anne France' , a biologist herself but principally wife of Raoul H. France', author of the classic soil microbiology text, Bios: The Laws of the World. They also met directly with co-workers of Dr. Ehrenfried Pfeiffer, late founder of The Pfeiffer Foundation in Spring Valley, NY. Dr. Pfeiffer was a microbiologist and agronomist who studied under Rudolf Steiner, the founder of biodynamic agriculture. The Luebkes obtained Pfeiffer's recipes for B.D. Compost Starter and B.D. Field Starter (green manure inoculant). This material served. as the building block for the microbial inoculant the Luebkes manufacture, known as C.M.C. Compost Starter. The Luebkes also adopted Pfeiffer's method of using the circular chromatogram to evaluate soil health. ATTRA is operated by the National Center for Appropriate Technology and funded by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dept. of the Interior. Printed on Recycled Paper. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 2 The Luebke humus management system is simple, yet effective. It relies on forage- and covercrop-based rotations, green manures, proper tillage operations, rock dusts, microbial inoculants, and C.M.C. compost to meet all fertility and pest control needs. Several "indicators" that this system really works are provided below. · In a ten year period, the organic matter content of a clay loam soil on their farm was changed from 2% to 15% Following fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident, root vegetables raised on their farm were uniquely free of radioactive contamination in comparison to other farms in the region The nitrate-nitrogen content of vegetables raised on their farm was significantly lower than conventionally-grown produce in Austria Microscopic slides (dyed with Acrodyne Orange) prepared from soils and composts on the Luebke farm "luminesce" in UV light due to the presence of microbes In response to numerous requests for information, the Luebkes began teaching classes. Currently, Uta and Angelika Luebke (her 30-year old daughter), co-teach classes while Siegfried stays home to manage the farm and conduct soil microbiology research. These classes consist of a 3-day Humus Management Seminar and a 4-day C.M.C. Compost Seminar. The seminars include both classroom instruction taught with slides and hands-on lab activities. Their main focus is in Central Europe, but they've also taught classes in Norway, Finland, the United States, and India. The October 1994 seminar in Pennsylvania that I attended was the third year in a row the Luebkes have conducted seminars in the U.S. Past seminars have been held in California, Missouri, and Pennsylvania. Their first speaking engagement in the U.S. was at the Acres, U.S.A. Conference in 1985. The host for C.M.C. Compost Seminars in the U.S. is George Leidig. Leidig lived and studied with the Luebkes for 3 years in Austria and now runs Autrusa Compost Consulting in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. Leidig coordinates certified C.M.C. activities and product distribution in the U.S. This includes the domestic manufacture of Sandberger Compost Turners, Top Tex compost fleece distribution, and laboratory testing for compost and soil analysis. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 3 Humus Management: Humus Formation & The Role of Soil Microbes Basic to humus management is an appreciation for the role of soil microorganisms in the formation of the clay-humus crumb as well as in the mineralization of humus and release of plant nutrients. Humus is the end result of organic matter decomposition by microbes. When fresh, undecomposed organic matter (green manures, animal manures, crop residues) is added to soils, an extremely rapid multiplication of soil microorganisms takes place. Certain microbes (bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes) break this raw organic matter down into smaller particles (gums, waxes, lignins) resistant to further decay and simple organic compounds (sugars, amino acids) that are water soluble. Following the breakdown phase, a second group of microbes bind together these materials, especially lignins and microbial biomass, into more stable humic substances (fulvic acid, humic acid, humins). The process whereby raw organic matter undergoes biological transformation and winds up complexed as humic substances is known as humification. Friable humus (also known as effective or nutritive humus), which supplies slow-release nutrients over a period of weeks or months, is a short-chain humic compound. Stable humus (also known as permanent humus), which has a half- life of years and may be viewed as the soil humus bank, is a long- chain humic compound.. When conditions are right, microbes attach these long-chain humic compounds to the clay fraction resulting in a clay-humus crumb. The goal of humus management is to arrive at an active, quality humus that is not soluble in water but rather soluble in root secretions from plants. In a healthy soil system, the Luebkes propose that a natural feedback loop exists whereby plants secrete root exudates telling microbes what they need, and in response, soil microbes regulate mineralization of the clay-humus crumb and feeding of the plants. One of Dr. Pfeiffer's theories was that inoculating soils and composts with microbes would help regulate the humification process. He understood there were basic laws at work in soils and that microbes regulated these activities. Using the analogy of building a house with carpenters, masoners, and electricians, Uta Luebke explained that in Nature, different microbes do specialized tasks. Therefore, microbe A cannot do the work of microbe B if it is not in its genes to begin with. Further, Uta explained that when specialists are missing, it takes longer to do the work. For example, when crop residues from last growing season or even 2-3 years ago are still visible, it's an Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 4 indication of a poor, inactive soil. In a good, microbially active soil, residues may be gone in as little time as a few weeks. Based on these ideas and the material provided by Dr. Pfeiffer's lab, Siegfried Luebke spent several years modifying the Pfeiffer recipe. The end result is C.M.C. Compost Starter, a mixture of 55 different types of microbes. Humus Management: Crop Rotations and Green Manuring Early on, the Luebkes learned how to inoculate green manures from Dr. Pfeiffer. They found enhanced formation of the humus crumb in comparison to non-inoculated green manures. They also found inoculated green manures breakdown faster and therefore enable the farmer to plant back sooner. Normally, a 3-4 week delay between green manuring and planting is recommended. The Luebkes often plant a vegetable crop the following day(s) after.green manuring. In April-May, every day is valuable for plant growth. Prior to putting out greenhouse transplants, green manures in the field are growing very nicely and accumulating extra nitrogen. It is important, then, when planting into freshly incorporated green manures, that the soil be capable of digesting the organic matter. The key is a microbially active soil via inoculation of green manures. "Farming is quite different when you work with an active soil," explained Uta. The Luebkes became convinced that microbial inoculation was making a difference when they were able to roto-till in mid-summer and the tiller sank down into a loose, friable soil; normally a tiller would just bounce around at that time of year. On the topic of establishing green manures and cover crops, Uta said that soil needs a plant cover at all times. They reseed a cover crop as soon as they take off a cash crop. The basic sequence goes like this: chop or shred green manure, let it lay on the field until the moisture is right for tilling the soil, and then inoculate just before you turn it in. The inoculant is applied via boom spray nozzles (1.2 mm, cone-shaped mist nozzles) on the front of the tractor. A spade plow is attached to the back of the tractor. The tillage implement used is a vital component of the system. Do not use tools that create a hard pan. The spade plow is preferred because it works the soil up and provides good aeration. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 3 Humus Management: Humus Formation & The Role of Soil Microbes Basic to humus management is an appreciation for the role of soil microorganisms in the formation of the clay-humus crumb as well as in the mineralization of humus and release of plant nutrients. Humus is the end result of organic matter decomposition by microbes. When fresh, undecomposed organic matter (green manures, animal manures, crop residues) is added to soils, an extremely rapid multiplication of soil microorganisms takes place. Certain microbes (bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes) break this raw organic matter down into smaller particles (gums, waxes, lignins) resistant to further decay and simple organic compounds (sugars, amino acids) that are water soluble. Following the breakdown phase, a second group of microbes bind together these materials, especially lignins and microbial biomass, into more stable humic substances (fulvic acid, humic acid, humins). The process whereby raw organic matter undergoes biological transformation and winds up complexed as humic substances is known as humification. Friable humus (also known as effective or nutritive humus), which supplies slow-release nutrients over a period of weeks or months, is a short-chain humic compound. Stable humus (also known as permanent humus), which has a half- life of years and may be viewed as the soil humus bank is a long- chain humic compound.. ' When conditions are right, microbes attach these long-chain humic compounds to the clay fraction resulting in a clay-humus crumb. The goal of humus management is to arrive at an active, quality humus that is not soluble in water but rather soluble in root secretions from plants. In a healthy soil system, the Luebkes propose that a natural feedback loop exists whereby plants secrete root exudates telling microbes what they need, and in response, soil microbes regulate mineralization of the clay-humus crumb and feeding of the plants. One of Dr. Pfeiffer's theories was that inoculating soils and composts with microbes would help regulate the humification process. He understood there were basic laws at work in soils and that microbes regulated these activities. Using the analogy of building a house with carpenters, masoners, and electricians, Uta Luebke explained that in Nature, different microbes do specialized tasks. Therefore, microbe A cannot do the work of microbe B if it is not in its genes to begin with. Further, Uta explained that when specialists are missing, it takes longer to do the work. For example, when crop residues from last growing season or even 2-3 years ago are still visible, it's an Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 5 The inoculant is applied at 1 unit/ha which costs $50/ha (about $20/acre). A tank is mounted on the side of the tractor. The volume of water required is enough to get the starter prep into solution and spread well. Following incorporation of fresh organic matter, the microbe population builds up rapidly. Young green material decomposes in as little as 5 days. Rain following incorporation is desirable to move organic matter into deeper layers where it gets incorporated into humus. Uta said that you can in fact build humus in deeper soil layers; i.e., beyond 2-3 ft. As an example, she showed a slide of a carrot crop that had roots going way down. The Luebkes grow a variety of cover crops. Faba bean (Horse bean) is popular in Austria. They raise rye, and rye-vetch mixtures. Legumes are important because they are nitrogen fixers. One of their main rotations is an alfalfa-grass mixture that stays in the ground without fertilization or compost for 4 years. The mix is cut to provide feed for their dairy sheep and green chop for their compost. On the last rotation, it is chopped, inoculated, and turned under as a green manure. When asked about the removal of green chop or hay from the alfalfa stand in relation to depletion of soil organic matter (O.M.), Uta said that when O.M. i-s 5% or above, top removal will not affect the soil'situation; below 5% O.M., removal is too much. A few details on green manuring are very important: · Be sure you have e~ough moisture for microbes to do their work; otherwise, O.M. will not be attacked properly · Oxygen is the other factor that should not be overlooked Never work deeper than you can guarantee availability of oxygen · If soil is too moist when it's time to green manure, chop it and allow it to dry on the surface prior to incorporation · Always chop first · It's important to cut the tops from the roots · Top removal causes root sloughing, a microbial food source · Microbes work faster due to the greater surface area · The more control during breakdown process, the less likely problems such as putrefaction will occur · For example, when you turn down green manure and it rains 5 days later and washes out real bad...go back and work soil again Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 6 · The Luebkes inoculate green manures every time The Luebkes use C.M.C. Compost Starter for green manures · Use B.D. Field Starter as a substitute, since the Luebke starter is not yet available in the U.S. * Incorporation, at least partially, is essential so microbes can work it · When left on the surface, microbes are killed/inhibited by UV light · Heavy residues tend to go anaerobic and putrefy · Green manures provide microbes with food which enables them, in turn, to do their important work in the soil Humus Management: ComDost ADDlication The Luebkes found that C.M.C. compost can be applied at about half the rate of compost made by the "old" method. For heavier feeding vegetables, they apply compost at 20 tons/ha, which is about the same as 7 tons/acre. Applications of 10 cu meters/ha/yr are recommended as maintenance rates. This is "as little as" 3 tons/acre. No more is needed with good compost. One problem that was brought to Uta's attention is that manure spreaders in the U.S. are calibrated to a minimum of 5 tons/acre. Uta said that compost spreaders in Europe are made to handle lower rates. The Luebkes apply 6-8 tons compost/acre for greenhouse tomatoes, which is about the same applied to field cultured tomatoes. They use a 1:1 compost to soil mix for transplants. They add 1/3 sand for soil blocks (cubes). Slugs were a real problem in one bed of onions that a gardener was taking care of. The gardener counted 12,000 slugs in one year. He added C.M.C. compost and they went away. Uta said the task of slugs is to take care of putrefaction. The soil in this bed ~as not digesting organic matter properly and therefore anaerobic conditions prevailed. C.M.C. compost helped correct the imbalance. One lady who took their classes prepared some C.M.C. compost and applied it to her carrots. One weeding for carrots was all that was needed. Before, they required 4-5 weedings. A decrease in weed pressure is a good sign of soil improvement. This is a common observation of organic farmers all across Europe. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 7 Humus Management: Soil Evaluation and Testing Evaluating the humus condition and biological activity of the soil is an important part of the Luebke program. The techniques they've arrived are especially useful in light of the crucial role humus plays in organic farming systems and its formation and regulation by soil microbes. The Luebkes use tests for: percent organic matter; humus; buffered pH; and circular chromatography. The Chroma Test The chroma test is also known as the circular chromatography test. It is done by wicking an alkali extract (sodium hydroxide) from either a soil or compost sample onto circular filter paper treated with silver nitrate. Silver coagulates humic substances. Unless you are well equipped to do lab work on your farm, it is much easier to have a commercial laboratory do the test for you. This test is based on the fact that humus is formed during composting and that as the process progresses the relatively low molecular-weight humic substances produced initially are polymerized into less soluble, macromolecular, mature humus. Chromatograms are interpreted by the shape and color of the central, transitional, and peripheral zones. Various colors are noted: white, pink, brown, violet, and black, as are shapes such as smooth, jagged or irregular (1) . The chroma test provides a visual, qualitative test of soil health. As soil microorganisms are involved in the humification of raw organic matter in soils (or during composting), the chroma test is a good indicator of soil microbial activity. In other words, humic substances travel different distances by capillary action depending on their molecular weight. The degree to which they've been humified indicates the level of microbial activity. Other features that can be learned from chromas include: · Good colloidal humus formation vs. acid humus substances · Various phases of compost fermentation (first, decomposition; second, humus formation; third, mineralization and greatly advanced decomposition) · Aerobic vs. anaerobic condition Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 8 Dr. Pfeiffer of The Pfeiffer Foundation in Spring Valley, New York, used the chroma test extensively. He published a handy, 44- page book, Chromatoqraphy Applied to Quality Testinq, containing color plates and descriptive entries for different soils, composts, and grain samples. It is available through: Biodynamic Farming & Gardening Association P.O. Box 550 Kimberton, PA 19442 (215) 935-7797 The Humus Test Organic matter tests, like the Walkly-Black method, are based on extraction with concentrated sulfuric acid. The result is given on a percentage basis. Typical organic matter rates runs around 1.0-2.0% for a sandy loam and 2.0-5.0% for a clay loam. The colorimetric humus test described here was developed in the United States earlier in this century, but apparently fell out of widespread use. The Luebkes teach it in their seminars and several commercial soils labs in the U.S. have started offering it. Apparently, East German agriculturists have been using this test for many years, but this was unknown until the fall of The Berlin Wall. The humus test is an indication of the level to which soil organic matter exists in a humified state. Humified organic matter is in a stable form and therefore nutrients and simple organic compounds associated with decomposing organic matter are less likely to leach away. In evaluating soil health, the Luebkes have found that O.M./humus readings should ideally be in a ratio of 1:2 or 1:3. Briefly, the humus test is a colorimetric comparison test. Soil or compost samples are processed with a weak alkali solution (sodium hydroxide) and then fixed with EDTA chelating agent. The filtered solution, or extract, that results from this procedure will have a distinctive color. The resulting sample is then compared to a standard set of colored vials on a scale of 0 to 100. The vials range from light yellow to dark yellow; light orange to dark orange; and light red to dark red. The darker the color, the greater the presence of humus. The humus test is a relative number, not a percentage. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 9 Buffered pH Test Another test the Luebkes use in conjunction with the chroma and humus test is the buffered pH test. It is based on the difference between a normal pH reading and a buffered pH reading. Potassium chloride (KCL) is used as the buffer. This test provides information on potential and actual pH, and therefore provides an indication of the biological activity in soils. The aim is to achieve a difference less than 0.5 for soils and 0.3 for compost. The Complete Luebke Soil Health Picture To get a complete picture of soil health, it is important to use all of the tests described above. Soil tests should be done by the same lab so that readings are accurate and meaningful in comparison to each other. Using C.M.C. compost and humus management techniques, the Luebkes were able to raise the organic matter of a clay loam soil from 2% O.M. to 15% O.M., with humus readings of 45 to 50. The Luebkes said that 2% soil O.M. is an absolute minimum to support normal biological functioning. Suggested ranges or goals for organic matter in agricultural soils are: Field crops Vegetables, orchards, pastures Gardens 3-5% 5-8% 10-14% In the U.S., George Leidig of Autrusa Compost Consulting provides a complete testing service associated with C.M.C. compost and humus management. A chroma-humus-O.M, test costs $45. Contact: Austrusa Compost Consulting P.O. Box 1133 Blue Bell, PA 19422 (610) 825-2973 C.M.C. Compost Preparation C.M.C. compost is a high quality compost with the following characteristics: · Aerobically produced · Proper microflora · Nutrients in stable form · A high ratio of humus to total organic matter · No sulfide, nitrite, or other harmful plant compounds Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 10 · Low ammonium levels · Nitrogen fixed into stable humus and microbial biomass C.M.C. compost is built in layers, and laid out in windrows for mechanical turning. The base layer should be a dry, high carbon material like municipal yardwaste (leaves and shredded tree trimmings) or dried hay or straw. A moist, high nitrogen material (animal manure, green chop) is laid down next, and so on, in repeating layers. In preparation of C.M.C. compost, the following general rules are important: i . The compost site should have a 3-5% slope in the direction of the windrow. There should be no side slope. These points relate to water drainage; water that collects under the compost pile will result in putrefaction. , o . Protection from drying winds. Windbreaks are an effective method for modifying the environment in this regard. Access to water. The source may be a fire hydrant, creek, pond, or well, but it is important that no chlorine is present because chlorine kills microbes. Water is used to regulate moisture at optimum levels during composting. Electrical power source. A power source is needed for the testing equipment. 5. Storage space for yardwaste and compost material. In addition, other items that are essential to C.M.C. compost include: · Use of Sandberger Compost Turner · Use of Top Tex compost fleece · Addition of 10% by volume clay loam in compost pile · Addition of 10% by volume finished compost in pile · Addition or diabase or basalt rock dust at 10-20 lbs/cu yd · Inoculation with C.M.C. Compost Starter Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 11 · Proper and timely aeration, or turning with compost turner · Monitoring of temperature, pH, 02, C02, NO3-, N02-, S02-, NH3 The Sandberger Turner was designed and tested for use with C.M.C. compost preparation and moves very slowly (900 ft/hr). The drum itself revolves slowly and the tines are designed to roll the material towards the center of the pile and thoroughly mix everything together. The end result is a well-aerated fluffy pile. ' Several Sandberger models are available, including self-propelled and tractor-pulled types. Tractors used in combination with the Sandberger should have a minimum of 55 h.p. and either a hydro- static drive or a "creeper gear." For tractors that do not have such a slow-moving feature, a diesel-powered "gear box" on wheels is available to "push" the tractor and attached Sandberger turner at a slow pace. Sandberger models available in the U.S. include: Baby Turner Industrial Turner Tractor pulled Gear box 7 ft wide 10 ft wide 10 ft wide $13,000 (self-propelled) $30,000 (self-propelled) $14,500 $4,500 Top Tex compost fleece is a geotextile.that sheds rainfall but helps retain moisture inside the pile; it als° blocks UV light harmful to microbes working the outer layers of the pile. In Europe, where composting is regulated to control nutrient leaching and runoff, compost fleece is used almost universally. Addition of 10% clay ~oam by volume is important in the formation of clay-humus crumb. Addition of finished compost helps regulate moisture and potential odor in the pile. Rock dust feeds the microorganisms and provides micronutrients. Compost monitoring tests are done on-site using a compost test kit that contains all the instruments required to measure temperature, pH, oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (C02), nitrates (NO3-), nitrites (NO2-), sulfides (S02-), and ammonia (NH3). While tests for organic matter, colorimetric humus, and circular chromatography (as described in the humus management section above) can be done by a commercial lab, the tests described here must be done on a daily basis by the composter themself. C.M.C. Compost Starter is not yet available in the U.S. It should be available sometime in 1995. In the meantime, I suggest using B.D. Compost Starter from the Pfeiffer Foundation in Monsey, NY. Contact: Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 12 The Pfeiffer Foundation Threefold Farm P.O. Box 524 Monsey, NY 10952 914-356-6522 One of the unique characteristics of C.M.C. compost is the careful and frequent aeration, or turning, of the windrow. C.M.C. compost takes 6-8 weeks to prepare. In a 6-week period, the windrow is turned 17 to 22 times. A typical schedule might go something like this: Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5-6 7 times per week 6 times per week 5 times per week 4 times per week 2 times per week Implementing C.M.C. Compost on Your Farm Finally, information on C.M.C. compost preparation is limited because it is still fairly new to the U.S. This letter summarizes the key points of humus management and how C.M.C. compost fits into the picture. It also summarizes the key procedures used in the preparation of C.M.C. compost. For those interested in trying C.M.C. compost, here are a few suggestions: . Acquire some finished C.M.C. compost and use it on test plots or as a potting mix ingredient. Observe the results and judge its performance in comparison to current practices. . · · Visit a C.M.C. composter, see the methodology, and ask questions. What have Luebke practitioners learned? Contact George Leidig or one of the regional distributors of C.M.C. technology Attend the 3-day Humus Management Seminar ($400) or the 4-day C.M.C. Compost Seminar ($600) held each fall in Pennsylvania and California . Implement parts of C.M.C. compost technology as affordable resources and time allows. For example, use your current compost turner, but integrate other C.M.C. concepts and methods such as use of clay loam soil, compost fleece, inoculants, frequent aeration, etc. Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995. page 13 Organic farming is based on a healthy soil well supplied with humus. The Luebkes evaluate the humus condition through several innovative soil tests, and manage soils through the use of well- planned crop rotations, green manures, rock dusts, proper tillage, microbial inoculants, and C.M.C. compost. C.M.C. compost requires specialized training and purchase of additional equipment and supplies. While many people will not be able to adopt this technoloqy in its entirety, at least initially, some farmers are choosing to adopt the general concepts and methods outlined by Luebkes, going as far as their current equipment and resource situation allows. On the other hand, the green manuring techniques described herein are easily adopted and will greatly speed up formation of the humus crumb. Whereas some farmers may be hesitant to spend $20 per acre inoculating a green manure, the cost of the inoculant may be viewed as a fertilizer input (since no additional N-P-K fertilizers are applied in the humus management system). I hope these comments and enclosed materials are helpful. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me at ATTRA. Best regards, Steve Diver Technical Specialist References: 1) Mathur, S.P. 1993. Determination of compost biomaturity. I. Literature Review. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. Vol. 10. p. 65-85. Enclosures= Autrusa Compost Consulting: composting supplies price list Autrusa Compost Consulting: lab test price list Autrusa Compost Consulting: "Why Compost?" Eric Sunswheat February 17, 1995 page 14 Enclosures: (continued) Koch, Erich, and Siegfried Luebke. 1988. Testing the fitness of compost. Unpublished manuscript. 14 p. Leidig, George. 1993. Austrian compost technology comes to the U.S. Northland Berry News. June. p. 10, 17. Leidig, George. 1993. Rock dust and microbial action in soil: The symbiotic relationship between composting and mineral additives. Remineralize the Earth. Spring. p. 12-14. Luebke, Siegfried. No date. Controlled microbial composting. Unpublished manuscript. 4 p. Mulder, Jane. 1991. Windows into worlds unseen. Organic Food Matters. Fall/Winter. p. 24-27. Top Tex product literature Sandberger produc~ literature: compost kit Sandberger product literature: Baby Turner Sandberger product literature: tractor-pulled model Useful Resources: Wass, Gerry. 1993. The Carbon Catcher Program. The Water Foundation, Brainerd, MN. 31 p. Booklet available for $4.95 from: The Water Foundation P.O. Box H20 Brainerd, MN 56401 218-829-3616 This little booklet summarizes the role of humus in ecological farming, outlines the basic principles of ecological agriculture, lists publications and resources, and contains a directory of alternative agricultural consultants and soil fertility labs. ATTRA's Cover Crops and Green Manures and Farm-Scale Compostinq Information Packages provide a good introduction and summary of these important practices and list many useful resources and contacts. Free copies are available from ATTRA at 1-800-346-9140. ATTRA is operated by the National Center for Appropriate Technology under a grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dept. of the Interior. These organizations do not recommend or endorse products, companies or individuals. , ITEM NO. 8a DATE: February21. 199R AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING THE USE OF TRAILERS AND CAMP CARS SUMMARY: As the attached letter from the Evangelical Free Church articulates, the church would like to accommodate the temporary assemblage of trailers and/or camp cars on the church grounds for periods of up to three weeks a year. Church representatives have indicated to staff that the total number of trailers or camp cars would typically be from four to eight, and that the church would provide temporary water, sewer, and electrical hook-up for the occupants of the trailers during their three- (Continued on page 2) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer item to Planning Department staff to develop Municipal Code amendments (§§2460-2463) allowing greater flexibility in the use of trailers and camp cars, and return to Council for introduction of ordinance amendments. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Deny request to amend the Municipal Code to allow greater flexibility in the use of trailers and camp cars, thereby affirming the current Code provisions limiting their use to no more than three consecutive days. Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Evangelical Free Church (Mr. Tom Tatum) Prepared by: Robert Sawyer, Planning Director Coordinated with- Candace Horsley, City Manager; David Rapport, City Attorney Attachments: Letter dated 2/14/96 from Evangelical Free Church a dace Horsley, City I~anager Page 2 week stay. The occupants of the trailers in this particular case are a group of retirees who travel around the country donating free labor to help build churches, rehabilitate housing, and staff inner-city soup kitchens. This group has been tentatively scheduled to assist the Evangelical Free Church with their projects in the month of April. Albeit a worthy endeavor, the current Ukiah Municipal Code (§§2460-2463) does not allow the use, occupancy, or maintenance of any trailer or camp car on land within the City as living or sleeping quarters, unless a license is secured from the State of California. This license, however, pertains to the typical trailer park or mobilehome park, which relates to full-time and permanent living accommodations. Nevertheless, the Code does contain an exception ({}2462 - Nonresident Visitor Overnight Sleeping) which allows the use of a trailer or camp car outside of an auto or trailer camp for a period not to exceed three consecutive days. Thus, in order to allow the use of trailers or camp cars for more than 3 days, as requested by the church letter, UMC §2462 would have to be relaxed and amended. Staff has had preliminary discussions with the City Attorney on this matter, and he has opined that the City has the authority to amend the cited Code provisions, and has the authority to relax the subject three-day restriction on the use of trailers or camp cars in the City. Moreover, staff is of the opinion that the limit of three weeks, as requested by the church, seems reasonable, although certainly some such short-term time limitation must be defined in the amended ordinance. Aisc, staff believes that it would be advisable to limit and quantify the maximum number of trailers assembled in any one place, and that the maximum number should be rather restrictive. The City Attorney and Planning staff would also recommend that the ordinance amendment articulate the Zoning Districts wherein the cited trailer/camp car use could and could not occur (for example, prohibiting it in the single-family zone), and establish an administrative, staff-level permit review procedure so as to avoid inherently deleterious situations (for example displacement of required off-street parking). Last, the City Attorney has stated that under no circumstance can the use of land for the cited purpose be associated with a monetary charge or cost to the users. If the City Council decides to move forward on the subject Code amendments, staff will expediently draft the necessary provisions, and return to Council for the required introduction hearing as quickly as possible. Indeed, we would expect to be able to return to Council at the very next regularly scheduled hearing on March 6, 1996. To: Candace Horsley From: Tom Tatum Evangelical Free Church 750 Yosemite Drive, Ukiah February 14, 1996 Dear Candace: We have recently completed a volunteer building project at the church. The project was made feasible with the help of a group of retirees known by the acronym MMAP, which stands for Mobile Missionary Assistance Program. These people travel around the country typically in fifth-wheel trailers. They donate 3 weeks of their time at a location to help build churches, inner- city soup kitchens, and do housing rehabilitation. They do projects much like Habitat for Humanity,- but specifically for churches. We provide temporary water, sewer, and electrical hookup in return for their volunteer labor. We are requesting an amendment to the existing ordinance to allow these'MMAP'ers to stay on the church property for a period of 3 weeks starting April 5, 1996. We would like to have them help landscape the new building and do building maintenance. The existing ordinance, approximately 45 years old, probably did not anticipate organizations like MMAP which came into being in the 1970's. It is a potential "win-win" situation for everyone. Churches can do building or property improvement they couldn't otherwise afford; the retirees stay physically active and get satisfaction from these goodwill projects; and the city benefits from these people who are tourists while they are here, visiting local shops and restaurants. We are most appreciative of the positive attitude and helpfulness the planning department staff has shown us to expedite this issue. Thank you Candace for responding so promptly. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tom Tatum ITEM NO. 9 a DATE: February 21, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE FINAL REPORT OF THE WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY FOR UPPER RUSSIAN RIVER AND UPPER MAIN EEL RIVER PREPARED BY KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS. REPORT: Provision Number 1 on the City's Water Supply Operating Permit requires that a Watershed Sanitary Survey be performed. Redwood Valley County Water District (RVCWD) and Millview County Water District (MCWD) have similar requirements. Since Ukiah, RVCWD and MCWD share the same watershed it was decided to conduct a joint study and share expenses. This joint study was approved at the April 5, 1995 City Council meeting for the amount of $32,132 with each water agency paying their proportionate share. The City of Ukiah acted as the lead agency during this project. The cost sharing breakdown is as follows: City of Ukiah $16,066.00 MCWD $10,710.66 RVCWD 8 5.355.34 Total $32,132.00 Upon your acceptance, this survey will be filed with the State Department of Health Services. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the Watershed Sanitary Survey for the Upper Russian River and Upper Main Eel River. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Deny acceptance of the report and direct staff as to any alternatives. Acct. No. (if not budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities ~/~. ~ Prepared by' George Borecky, Water/Sewer Operations Superintendent Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: Final Report of the Watershed Sanitary Survey for Upper Russian River and Upper Eel River APPROVED: Can~lace Horsley, City I~lanager WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY FOR UPPER RUSSIAN RIVER AND UPPER MAIN EEl.. RIVER January 1996 K/J 950035.00 Prepared for: ,: CITY OF UKIAH, MILLVIEW COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, REDWOOD VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Prepared by: KENNEDY/JENK$ CONSULTANTS 303 Second Street, 10th Floor North San Francisco, Califomia 94107 TABLE OF CONTENTS Kennedy/Jenks Consultants SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. i ......... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 Potential Sources Of Contaminants In The Watershed .................................................. 1 Compliance With Ddnking Water Standards ................................................................... 2 Key Conclusions And Recommendations ....................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Sanitary Survey Requirements .............................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Objectives .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Conduct Of The Study ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Report Content And Organization .......................................................................... 1-2 2 WATERSHEDS AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS ....................................................... 2-1 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Watershed Descriptions ................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Land Use ....................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.3 Natural Setting .............................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.4 Existing Hydrology ........................................................................................ 2-5 2.2 Water Supply ......................................................................................................... 2-5 · - 2.2.1 City Of Ukiah ................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Millview County Water District ....................................................................... 2-8 2.2.3 Redwood Valley County Water District ....................................................... 2-11 3 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES IN THE WATERSHEDS ................................ 3-1 3.1 Survey Methods ..................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Potential Contaminant Sources ............................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Wastewater .................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Reclaimed Water ............................................... '. .......................................... 3-3 3.2.3 Urban Runoff ................................................................................................. 3-4 3.2.4 Agricultural Crop Land Use ........................................................................... 3-5 3.2.5 Grazing Animals ............................................................................................ 3-5 3.2.6 Concentrated Animal Facilities ...................................................................... 3-5 3.2.7 Pesticide/Herbicide Use ................................................................................ 3-5 3.2.8 Wild Animals ................................................................................................. 3-6 3.2.9 Mine Runoff ................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.10 Solid And Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities .......................................... 3-6 3.2.11 Logging ....................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.12 Recreational Use ......................................................................................... 3-7 3.2.13 Unauthorized Activity .................................................................................. 3-8 3.2.14 Underground Fuel Storage Tanks ............................................................... 3-8 3.2.15 Traffic Accidents/Spills ................................................................................ 3-8 3.2.16 Groundwater Which Influences Surface Water Quality ............................... 3-9 3.2.17 Seawater Intrusion ....................................................................................... 3-9 3.2.18 Geologic Hazards ........................................................................................ 3-9 January Kennedy/Jenks Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) 3.2.19 Fires .......................................................................................................... 3-10 3.3 Significance Of Potential Contaminant Sources .................................................. 3-10 3.4 Anticipated Growth Within The Watershed .......................................................... 3-10 3.5 Projected Changes In Sources Of Contaminants ................................................ 3-11 4 WATERSHED CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ...................................... 4-1 4.1 Water Purveyors Management Practices ............................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 City Of Ukiah ................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 Millview County Water District ....................................................................... 4-1 4.1.3 Redwood Valley County Water District ......................................................... 4-1 4.1.4 Watershed Operations .................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.5 Inspection And Surveillance Of The Watershed ........................................... 4-2 4.2 Other Agencies With Watershed Control Authority ................................................ 4-2 4.2.1 National Forest Plans And Policies ............................................................... 4-3 4.2.2 Lake County General Plan Policies ............................................................... 4-4 4.2,3 Mendocino County General Plan Policies ..................................................... 4-4 4.2.4 RWQCB Waste Discharge Requirements ..................................................... 4-5 4.2.5 Mendocino County Water Agency ................................................................. 4-6 4.2.6 City Of Ukiah ................................................................................................. 4-7 4.2.7 Soil Conservation Service ............................................................................. 4-7 4.2.8 Recreational Activities And Policies .............................................................. 4-8 4.2.9 Open Space Policies ..................................................................................... 4-8 4.2.10 Erosion Control/Soil Management Policies ................................................. 4-8 4.2.11 Fire Management ........................................................................................ 4-8 4.2.12 Spill Notification ........................................................................................... 4-8 4.2.13 California Rangeland Water Quality Management Plan .............................. 4-8 4.3 Coordination Measures .......................................................................................... 4-9 5 WATER QUALITY .......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Drinking Water Regulations ................................................................................... 5-1 5.1,1 Summary Of Surface Water Treatment Regulation ....................................... 5-1 5.1.2 Contaminants Of Concern Within The Watershed ........................................ 5-1 5.2 Existing Water Quality ........................................................................................... 5-2 5.2.1 Monitoring Programs ..................................................................................... 5-2 5.2.2 Evaluation Of Monitoring Data ...................................................................... 5-3 5.3 Evaluation Of Ability To Meet Swtr Requirements ................................................. 5-4 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 6-2 7 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 7-1 ii January lgg6 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) Kennedy/Jenks Consultants TABLE 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 3-1 3-2 3-3 4-1 4-2 5-1 5-2 LIST OF TABLES TITLE City Of Ukiah Water Production Data Description Of City Of Ukiah Groundwater Wells RVCWD Water Production Data RVCWD Domestic Water Storage Crop Acreage Significance Of Potential Contaminant Sources Projected Changes In Contaminants USDAFS Policies Related To Watershed Protection USDAFS Recreational Policies Project Name Water Treatment Plant Monitoring Schedule City Of Ukiah Raw Water Bacteriological Monitoring - Comparison Of The Ranney Collector And The Russian River Waters FIGURE 1-1 2-1 2-2 3-1 LIST OF FIGURES TITLE Water Intakes And Potential Contaminant Sources Water District Service Areas Redwood Valley County Water District Service Area Boundary Existing Wastewater Service Area LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX TITLE A Annual Water Quality Reports For The City Of Ukiah B Annual Water Quality Reports For The Miliview County Water District C Annual Water Quality Reports For The Redwood Valley County Water District · i:W~,~'~,(x~s.oo~e~-,~ III January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this watershed sanitary survey was to identify and evaluate potential contaminant sources within the watersheds of the city of Ukiah (City), the Millview County Water Distdct (MCWD), and the Redwood Valley County Water Distdct (RVCWD), (collectively the water purveyors) which may impact the quality of their surface water supplies. The City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD are required to conduct this watershed sanitary survey for compliance with the California Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR). The water purveyors jointly participated in the preparation of this sanitary survey because they have common watersheds and water supply sources. The study area of this sanitary survey is comprised of the Upper Main Eel River Watershed and the Upper Russian River Watershed (Study Area). BACKGROUND The City, MCWD, and the RVCWD have the following sources of water supply for their municipal customers: · Water from the Upper Main Eel River Watershed that is stored in Lake Mendocino and released to the Russian River; · Water from the Upper Russian River Watershed that mixes with Upper Main Eel River water; and Groundwater from the alluvial material in the Ukiah Valley. The City has the most downstream water intake through its Ranney collector system which collects water from the gravels beneath the Russian River. The City also has four groundwater wells located near its Ranney collector. The MCWD water is drawn upstream of the City's Ranney collector system from shallow groundwater wells near the Russian River and, dudng the summer months, from direct intakes from the river. The MCWD also has three groundwater wells that can be used on an emergency basis. The RVCWD draws its water directly from Lake Mendocino. The Upper Main Eel River Watershed consists of about 223,361 acres (349 square miles) of primarily National Forest land located northeast of the water purveyors' service areas. In addition to the forest lands, the watershed includes small pockets of private lands. The Upper Russian River Watershed consists of about 155,000 acres (240 square miles) above the City's Ranney collector which is the most downstream water intake of the three water purveyors. The Upper Russian River Watershed consists pdmadly of pdvate lands, which are used predominately for agricultural purposes. The City of Ukiah is the most developed and urbanized area with the Study Area. POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINANTS IN THE WATERSHED Because of the predominant land uses within the watershed, open space land use and limited populated areas within the watershed, there are relatively few potential contaminant sources within the watershed which are of great significance to water quality. Also, because of the size of the watersheds, and the presence of Lake Pillsbury and Lake January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Mendocino, the potential impacts of these limited contaminant sources are further reduced. In general, the watershed areas provide an excellent water supply source with few potential contaminant sources. The potential contaminant sources which have the most significant potential impact on water quality are: 1. Wastewater treatment facilities 2. Septic systems 3. Grazing animals which have access to the creeks, Lake Pillsbury, and Lake Mendocino within the Study Area 4. Wild animals 5. Non-body and body contact recreation at Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino 6. Spills from traffic or railroad accidents 7. Releases from industrial activities The first five sources are primarily microbiological in nature and the last two sources potentially present chemical hazards to the water supplies. The significance of some of these potential sources (particularly septic systems) may increase in the future as population in the surrounding areas increases and use of the watershed's open space and recreation resources increases. The U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USDAFS), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Mendocino County, as well has other agencies, have numerous policies and control measures in place to monitor and regulate activities within the watershed and protect the water quality and other natural resources within the watersheds. These measures address the pdmary concerns regarding the potential contaminants in the watersheds. COMPLIANCE WITH DRINKING WATER STANDARDS The City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD, have water quality monitoring programs in place to monitor the quality of both the raw and treated water supplies. Treated water quality data are collected and evaluated regularly. Raw water quality data are collected annually and provided to the customers of each water purveyor. The California Department of Health Services (DHS) has evaluated each water purveyor's water treatment plant and water supply system and provided each purveyor with filtration and disinfection requirements. The DHS has required that the City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD each provide a minimum of 3 log (99.9 percent) reduction for Giardia and 4 log (99.99 percent) reduction of virus through their filtration and disinfection treatment processes. Based on relative risks from the contaminant sources and the requirements of 2 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants the SWTR, the DHS requirement for 3 log Giardia and 4 log virus minimum removal remain appropriate for the surface water supplies for each water purveyor. The City achieves the removal rates through a treatment process which is classified as an alternative filtration technology under the SWTR. The MCWD achieves the removal rates through a treatment process which is classified as direct filtration under the SVVTR. The RVCWD achieves removal rates by using conventional filtration treatment technology. All of the water purveyors meet the remainder of the removal through disinfection using chlorine. None of the water purveyors have experienced difficulty in satisfying DHS' removal requirements. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In general, the watershed areas appear to be excellent water supplies with relatively few potential contaminant sources. As described in this sanitary survey report, the USDAFS, the RVVQCB, Mendocino County, and several other agencies have many policies and controls in place to protect the natural resources and water quality of the Upper Main Eel River and Upper Russian River Watersheds. Based on the findings and conclusions of this watershed sanitary survey, the following additional controls are recommended: . The greatest potential threat to drinking water quality is that of a spill of deleterious material (e.g. petroleum products, hazardous or toxic substances) that could enter Lake Mendocino or the Russian River. The threat is potentially great because the water treatment systems used by the City, the RVCWD, and the MCWD were not designed to remove these types of substances. It also appears that the water purveyors may not be notified in a timely manner of spills that may pose a threat to Lake Mendocino or the Russian River. It is recommended that the City, the RVCWD, and the MCWD develop a notification plan so that the water purveyors are notified immediately of any hazardous material spill that could impact Lake Mendocino or the Russian River. The plan should include coordination with and distribution to the 911 dispatcher at the Howard Forest Emergency Command Center, State Office of Emergency Services, California Highway Patrol, Mendocino County Environmental Health Department Hazardous Materials Team, California Department of Transportation, California Northern Railroad, and other entities to ensure notification of a spill. . The recreational use of Lake Mendocino poses some threats to water quality which affects all three water purveyors. However, public recreation is a significant, well- established purpose of Lake Mendocino. The City, RVCWD, and MCWD should work with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to initiate a public information campaign to educate the recreation area's visitors of the multipurpose roles of the lake. Signboards and fliers could be part of an information campaign that would help to discourage activities which could cause adverse impacts to the quality of the lake water. . Many septic tank systems exist within the Russian River Watershed. According to the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department, there have been no major system failures, although some areas have higher than average replacements. The City, RVCWD, and MCWD should request that the Mendocino 3 Janua~ 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants , 0 0 . . County Environmental Health Department notify the water purveyors of any future system failures which may impact water quality within the watershed. Septic tank use in the Upper Main Eel River Watershed is minimal and should not require this notification. The grazing of cattle within the watershed is allowed on much of the private lands. Horses are also grazed on private lands. Cattle grazing on private lands (e.g., ranches) occurs primarily in Potter Valley. Cattle have access to water courses and are a source of Giardia, Cryptosporidium, viruses and bacteria to the rivers and lake. The City, RVCWD, and MCWD should coordinate with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and other agencies such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service and various county agencies implementing the SWRCB's Rangeland Water Quality Management Plan to work with cattle ranchers to encourage cattle grazing away from waterways. The use of the watershed by wild animals is a natural occurrence which adds to the value and beauty of the watershed. However, wild animals within the watershed are also a potential source of Giardia, Cryptosporidium, viruses and bacteria directly into the creeks and lakes. Control of wild animals within the watershed is virtually impossible; therefore, no recommendations for wild animal control are proposed. At present, there are no cooperative multi-agency agreements to protect the watersheds' resources, although the sharing of resources by the City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD to prepare this sanitary survey is a first step. The City, the RVCWD, and the MCWD should consider formalizing cooperative agreements with agencies such as USDAFS, Mendocino County Water Agency, and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) to coordinate watershed activities that enhance water quality in the future for the mutual benefit of the agencies. Coordination activities could include periodic meetings and written procedures with goals and policies, implementation plans, and contact names and telephone numbers. The water purveyors' existing monitoring programs are consistent with DHS' requirements and provide an effective means for monitoring the contaminants of concern within the watersheds. The sampling frequency and locations, and parameters monitored appear appropriate for the contaminant sources identified in the watersheds. No additional monitoring is recommended. The City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD may wish to consider the development of a joint water quality database for maintaining and analyzing watershed water quality data. The database, which could be spreadsheet-based, should include the weekly and monthly bacteriological data for each entity. Such a database would enable the water purveyors to track water quality changes and trends at the sampling points within the watersheds. The database could also be expanded to include other water quality data. January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants I INTRODUCTION 1.1 SANITARY SURVEY REQUIREMENTS The Califomia Surface Water Treatment Regulation (SWTR) requires that all domestic water suppliers using surface water supply sources conduct a sanitary survey of their water supply watersheds by 1 January 1996, and to update that survey every five years thereafter. The survey is required to evaluate potential contaminant sources within the watershed which may impact drinking water quality. 1.2 OBJECTIVES The objectives for the watershed sanitary survey for the City of Ukiah (City), the Millview County Water District (MCWD), and the Redwood Valley County Water District (RVCWD) are: · To meet the SVVTR requirements for a sanitary survey. To identify and evaluate potential contaminant sources within the Upper Main Eel River and the Upper Russian River Watersheds which may impact the quality of the drinking water supplied to the water purveyors' customers. · To evaluate existing controls and management practices which protect drinking water quality within the watersheds. 1.3 CONDUCT OF THE STUDY On 8 May 1995, the City, on behalf of all three water purveyors, authorized Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (Kennedy/Jenks) to prepare this sanitary survey of the watersheds. Kennedy/Jenks conducted this sanitary survey by collecting and reviewing available information from the following agencies: · City of Ukiah · Millview County Water District · Redwood Valley County Water District · City of Ukiah Community Development Department · Mendocino County Environmental Health Department · Mendocino County Planning Department · Mendocino County Agricultural Commissioner · Mendocino County Water Agency · Lake County Planning Department U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service · Sotoyome-Santa Rosa Resource Conservation District · U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service - Mendocino National Forest · U.S. Geological Survey · U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · California Department of Fish and Game · California Department of Forestry 1-1 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants · California Department of Health Services · California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) · California Highway Patrol · California Regional Water Quality Control Board- North Coast Region · Potter Valley Irrigation District · California Northern Railroad · Calpella County Water District Kennedy/Jenks also conducted a field survey of the Upper Main Eel River and Upper Russian River Watersheds on 18 and 19 August 1995 to identify and investigate potential contaminant sources within this Study Area. The field survey consisted of a driving and walking tour of the watershed areas. 1.4 REPORT CONTENT AND ORGANIZATION The content and organization of this sanitary survey report is consistent with the format recommended in the American Water Works Association California-Nevada Section Watershed Sanitary Survey Guidance Manual (1993). The report is divided into the following sections: · Introduction · Watersheds and Water Supply Systems · Potential Contaminant Sources in the Watersheds · Watershed Control and Management Practices · Water Quality · Conclusions and Recommendations A complete list of references, including reports and agency contacts, used in the preparation of this sanitary survey is included at the end of this report. 1-2 996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 2 WATERSHEDS AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS 2.1 WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS The source water of the Russian River near Ukiah are derived from the Upper Eel River Watershed and the Russian River Watershed including Potter Valley, Redwood Valley, Ukiah Valley and the surrounding areas. Since 1908, flow from the Eel River has been diverted from Van Arsdale Reservoir, through an aqueduct tunnel to Pacific Gas and Electric's (PG&E) Potter Valley hydroelectric power generating facility in the Russian River Watershed. The water then flows through Potter Valley where it is used for agriculture before entering Lake Mendocino. The watershed boundaries and main watercourses are shown on Plate 1 and detailed descriptions of the two watersheds are provided below. 2.1.1 Watershed Descriptions Upper Eel River Watershed The majority of the Upper Main Eel Watershed lies within the Mendocino National Forest (National Forest), which is located on the west side of the California Coast Range approximately 25 miles northeast of Ukiah, California. Eighty-four percent of the watershed lies in Lake County, California. The remainder is in Mendocino County (ten percent) and Glenn County (six percent). The watershed includes the headwaters of the Eel River downstream to the Cape Hom Dam which impounds Van Arsdale Reservoir. The eastem boundary of the watershed runs along the backbone of the California Coast Range from Bald Mountain in the north, through Snow Mountain to Goat Mountain in the south. It forms a basin of neady 350 square miles encompassing the entire Eel River drainage above the Cape Hom Dam. The dam is located at the Iow elevation point of the watershed. Above Cape Horn Dam on the Eel River, near the center of the watershed, lies another reservoir, Lake Pillsbury. Lake Pillsbury is impounded by Scott Dam approximately 25 miles northeast of Ukiah. Scott Dam is operated and maintained by PG&E and most land inundated by the lake is owned by PG&E. Lake Pillsbury has three main arms: the Eel River Valley and Canyon form the eastern arm, the Rice Fork Canyon forms the southern arm, and Smokehouse Creek and other streams feed the northern arm. The flow of the Eel River, Rice Fork and other streams above Lake Pillsbury is unregulated, and pdmadly influenced by rainstorms. When full, Lake Pillsbury has a storage capacity of 80,700 acre- feet and covers over 3 square miles. As described above, after leaving Lake Pillsbury, the Eel River is diverted from Van Arsdale reservoir through a tunnel to a PG&E powerhouse located in Potter Valley, from which it flows through Potter and Ukiah Valleys via the East Fork of the Russian River. The diversion has occurred for PG&E power generation, certain water rights to the agricultural users in Potter Valley, and to augment summer flows of the Russian River. The diversion tunnel has a capacity of 345 cubic-feet per second (cfs) and runs at full capacity during the winter and at about two-thirds capacity during August and September. Flow during other times of the year vary with power production needs. The diversions from the Eel River to the Russian River Watershed have benefited agricultural and recreational 2-1 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants water users by providing flows during the summer time and by dampening the effect of drought years. Russian River Watershed The Russian River originates in central Mendocino County, approximately 15 miles north of Ukiah. The Russian River Watershed encompasses about 105 square miles above Lake Mendocino and about 240 square miles above the most downstream water intake in Ukiah. The Russian River Watershed above Ukiah is developed for industrial, agricultural and recreationaJ purposes. The main channel of the Russian River is about 110 miles long from its headwaters near Redwood and Potter Valleys to the Pacific Ocean at Jenner, about 20 miles west of Santa Rosa. Lake Mendocino is impounded by Coyote Dam which is located on the East Fork of the Russian River, 0.8 miles upstream from the confluence of the east and west forks. Lake Mendocino was constructed in 1959 to store the diverted Eel River water. Lake Mendocino has a 122,500 acre-feet storage capacity of which 48,000 acre-feet is for flood storage, 70,000 acre-feet is for conservation pool (i.e. domestic/agricultural supply), and 4,500 acre- feet for sediment storage. Lake Mendocino, the storage impoundment for the Redwood Valley County Water District, is used extensively by recreational users. 2.1.2 Land Use The primary land use in the Upper Main Eel River Watershed, as designated by the Lake County Planning Department, is public lands with some minor portions of rural land, rural residential, and suburban residential lands. The primary uses of the Upper Main Eel Watershed public lands are recreation, water quality enhancement, protection of resources through biodiversity enhancement and ecosystem management with minor production of forest commodities. The percentages of public and private lands are discussed below. The land uses within the Upper Russian River Watershed vary widely from the more urbanized City of Ukiah to the more rural areas of the Ukiah, Redwood, and Potter Valleys. Land uses within the City of Ukiah as designated by the City's Community Development Department are of higher densities than the surrounding areas. Land uses include a maximum density of 29 units/acre for the General Multiple Family designation (R-3) and minimum residential density of I unit/acre for the Single Family-Hillside (H-4) designation. In addition, there are light commercial, industrial, and manufacturing designations for portions of the City. The predominant land uses in the Ukiah Valley outside of the City of Ukiah are designated as agricultural, range land, and remote residential by the Mendocino County Planning Department. Agricultural lands have a minimum parcel size of 40 acres, remote residential lands uses have parcel sizes ranging from 20 to 40 acres, while range lands have a 160-acre minimum parcel size. The balance of the Ukiah Valley consists of small areas of industrial land, rural residential land ranging from 1- to 10-acre minimum parcel sizes, and suburban residential lands that can vary from approximately 0.1- to 1-acre parcels. Range lands dominate the hillsides around the Ukiah Valley. 2-2 January 199~ Kennedy/Jenks Consultants The Redwood Valley area also has a predominantly agricultural land use with small pockets of rural residential lands of 1- to 10-acre parcels and remote residential lands of 40-acre parcels. The Redwood Valley is separated from the Ukiah and the Potter Valleys by range lands of 160-acre minimum parcel size. Similarly, Potter Valley also is dominated by agricultural land uses, suburban residential, remote residential lands of 40-acre parcels, and rural community and public lands. The hillsides surrounding Potter Valley are also predominantly range lands. The majodty of the 223,361 acres (349 square miles ) of the Upper Main Eel Watershed is located within the Mendocino National Forest. Of these lands, 183,838 acres (83 percent) of the watershed is under U.S. Forest Service (USFS) management, 37,484 acres (17 percent) are state or pdvate lands, and the remaining 2,039 acres(<1 percent) are under Bureau of Land Management. The pdvate lands include the area around Lake Pillsbury which are owned by PG&E. The majodty of the approximately 155,000 acres (240 square miles) of the Russian River Watershed upstream of the City's Ranney collector is on pdvate land. There are small areas totaling about 7 percent or about 10,000 acres (15.7 square miles) which are public lands. These public lands include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Lake Mendocino facility, portions of the Bureau of Land Management's Cow Mountain Management Area, and Indian lands. 2.1.3 Natural Setting To~)o~raphy As shown on Plate 1, the Upper Main Eel Watershed above Lake Pillsbury rises to elevations over 6,000 feet above mean sea level (MSL) on the slopes of Bald Mountain. The Rice Fork of the Upper Main Eel River originates on the west side of Goat Mountain dropping from elevations from 5,600 feet to 1,800 feet above MSL along the Bartlett Springs Fault Zone. From Lake Pillsbury, at an elevation of about 1,800 feet above MSL, the Upper Main Eel flows to the diversion at Van Arsdale reservoir which is at an elevation of about 1,600 feet above MSL. The Russian River Watershed rises to a maximum elevation of 3,924 feet above MSL near the headwaters of Cold Creek in the southeast portion of the watershed. At the most upstream end of the Russian River the elevation is about 3,339 feet above MSL to the north and the elevation is about 2,699 feet above MSL at Eagle Peak at the northwest end of Redwood Valley. The Coyote Dam spillway at Lake Mendocino is at an elevation of 765 feet above MSL and the City's Ranney collector at the downstream end of the watershed is at about 600 feet above MSL. In the higher elevations of both watersheds, steep slopes often result in unstable hillsides which are subject to landslides and soil creep. GeoloQv Similar to the rest of the Coast Range mountains, the geology of the Upper Main Eel River Watershed is comprised of relatively recent formations. The watershed is in an area of uplift that began in the Pleistocene over 3 million years ago. The uplift has resulted in 2-3 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants significant faulting, folding, and erosion in the steep slopes of the watershed area. The Bartlett Springs Fault Zone crosses the Upper Main Eel River Watershed in a southeast to northwest direction as seen in the Rice Fork Valley and the Gravelly Valley near Lake Pillsbury. The rock formations of the watershed are of Late Jurassic to Eocene age (120 - 55 million years before present). Sedimentary rocks and metamorphic rocks are found with Jurassic age ultramafic and volcanic rocks such as the Franciscan formation which is described in greater detail below (USFS 1995b). The geology of the Russian River Watershed area is generally of Upper Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous -age shales, graywackes, conglomerates, cherts and schists of the Franciscan Formation. The Franciscan Formation is a heterogeneous mass of sedimentary, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks that have been extensively folded, faulted, and undergone metamorphosis. As a result, the rocks of the Franciscan Formation are highly erodible and unstable. When combined with the high intensity winter rainfalls of the area and steep slopes of much of the area, the unstable geology results in landslides and soil creep that can create high turbidity waters. (SCS 1991) The valley floors of both watershed areas are underlain by quaternary alluvium that have been distributed from the rocks of the surrounding hillsides. The Ukiah area is underlain by the recently discovered Maacama Fault. Estimates of earthquake magnitude on the Maacama Fault range from 6.5 to 8.1 Richter Magnitude (Mendocino County General Plan 1993). .Soils Due to the geologic nature of the area, the soils within the steeper portions of the watershed areas are unstable due to weathering and steep slopes and are prone to erosion, landslides, and slumps. As discussed in Section 3.0 of this report, certain areas of the watershed are prone to rock slides and some erosion does occur during heavy storm events. As noted earlier, the watershed area is underlain by the Franciscan Formation that is known to contain serpentine. Serpentine occurs in three forms, one of which, chrysotile, contains asbestos. According to RWQCB geologists, chrysotile serpentine is likely to be present but its presence cannot be positively confirmed. There is a great variety of vegetation in the Upper Main Eel and Russian River Watersheds. In general, the lower elevations of the watersheds have oak woodlands and grass understories and the higher elevations have fir trees. Southern exposure slopes are often covered with manzanita, chemise and various species of oak, and ridgetops, upper slopes and northern exposure slopes support coniferous forests. The Upper Main Eel River Watershed has several sensitive plant species including Anthony Peak Lupine, Cleveland's Milk Vetch, and Glandular Dwarf Flax. Perennial streams in the watersheds are generally lined with riparian forest including willows, ash, and black cottonwood trees. (SCS 1991, USFS 1995b) January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Wildlife Wildlife in the watershed areas is quite diverse and scattered. Wildlife which has been observed in the area include deer, bobcats, jack rabbits, squirrels and other small rodents. Several species of birds, including bald and golden eagles, have also been observed in the watershed. No beavers or muskrats, which are common carriers of giardia and cryptosporidium, have been observed in the area, because habitats for these types of animals do not typically occur in the area's creeks and rivers. 2.1.4 Existing Hydrology Both watershed areas have similar semi-arid climates with warm, dry summers and cool, wet winters. Temperatures range from 20 degrees F to 110 degrees F. The precipitation in the Upper Main Eel Watershed averages about 44 inches per year, 80 percent of which falls mostly as rain between November and March. The City of Ukiah receives about 35 inches of precipitation per year. Snow does occasionally fall at higher elevations. High intensity storms (5-10 inches in a 72-hour pedod) sometimes occur. Rain-on-snow events occasionally occur dudng the winter months causing high peak flows in the streams. (USFS 1995a) The maximum depth of Lake Mendocino vades from about 101 feet deep at the conservation pool level to 128 feet deep when the lake level is at the top of the spillway. Lake Mendocino experiences a pronounced turnover every year in the fall and experiences algae blooms most years in the late summer. 2.2 WATER SUPPLY As' described above, the watershed supplying the City of Ukiah (City), the Millview County Water Distdct (MCWD), and the Redwood Valley County Water Distdct (RVCWD) has source waters dedving from both the Russian and Eel River Watersheds. The RVCWD relies solely on surface water and takes its water supply from Lake Mendocino. The MCWD withdraws its surface supply from the Russian River about an eighth of a mile downstream of the confluence of the East Fork and West Fork Russian River. The City's Ranney collector withdraws water from the Russian River north of the dver's confluence with Orrs Creek. Both MCWD and the City have groundwater wells in addition to their Russian River supplies. The locations of the intakes and the service areas of all three water purveyors are shown on Plate 1, and Figures 2-1 and 2-2. In addition to the three water purveyors described here, there are other water purveyors in the area that use only groundwater supplies and are not subject to the preparation of a sanitary survey. Descriptions of the three water suppliers and treatment systems are provided below. 2.2.1 City Of Ukiah The City was originally granted a water supply permit in 1939 to supply domestic water to the City of Ukiah and vicinity. The permit was revised and reissued in July 1953, and again in April 1962. In 1987, a temporary permit was issued to the City which expired on 1 December 1989. One of the provisions of this permit required the City to submit a report to the DHS demonstrating that the City's Ranney collector provided effective and reliable treatment for the removal or inactivation of enteric viruses and Giardia Lamblia organisms. 2-5 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants The City agreed to forgo this report and to design a new treatment plant for use on the Ranney Collector. The treatment plant was placed in service in April 1992. The City of Ukiah currently operates under Water Supply Permit No. 09-93-007 issued on 30 April 1993. Service Area As of December 1994, the City served an estimated population of 15,000 through 6,316 service connections. This includes 4,545 individual metered connections and 1,771 fiat rate customers that are served by master meters. The master meter connections serve developments such as apartment complexes and mobile home parks. The City's customers are principally residential and commercial users, and only a few industrial customers. The City is bounded by three other water systems: the MCWD to the north, the Willow County Water District to the south and the Rogina Water Company to the East as shown on Figure 2-1. The City is bounded by steep rugged hills to the west. Consequently, unless there is a consolidation of service areas through annexation or service agreement, there is limited potential for significant growth. Water Production Water production data for 1994 is summarized in Table 2-1. Analysis of water production data for the year 1994 indicates an average daily demand of 3 million gallons per day (mgd). Average demand during the month of maximum use was 830.4 gallons per day per connection. Sources of Supply The source of water for the City is the Russian River and groundwater. The City currently uses five well sources and a Ranney collector that diverts water from the Russian River for routine production purposes. Disinfection treatment is provided for all groundwater well sources and water produced by the Ranney collector is processed through the City's water treatment plant. The City obtained a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board in 1954 for the right to divert up to 20 cfs (30.8 mgd) of water from the Russian River. Streamflow during the rainy season comprises most of the total annual flow of the Russian River. From May through September, most of the flow is imported water from the Eel River as described in Section 2.1.1 above. Intake Facility The City's Ranney collector was constructed on the west bank of the Russian River in 1966 with a design capacity of 13 mgd. It is located approximately 0.25 miles east of Highway 101 and 0.5 miles north of East Perkins Street. The Ranney collector is comprised of a concrete caisson and several lateral collection lines. The caisson is 16 feet in diameter and extends to a depth of 47 feet below ground surface (bgs). There were initially nine horizontal, perforated-screen, 10-inch diameter laterals which extended horizontally from the caisson at two levels beneath the Russian River. However, one of the laterals was plugged and abandoned in April 1981 because poor construction resulted in high levels of turbidity. Two yertical turbine pumps, one variable speed and one constant speed, are used to pump raw water from the collector to the plant for treatment. i:~,,~o~.~.oo,,.~,..,~,,. 2-6 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants In addition, the City uses five groundwater well sources for water as shown on Figure 2-1. Descriptions of the groundwater wells are presented in Table 2-2. As the bottom of the Russian River channel has declined in elevation as a result of natural stream processes, the resulting decline in water table has affected the yield of Wells 2, 3, 5 and 6 during the Iow river flow that occurs in the summer months. During the high-demand summer months, Wells 2 and 6 are pumped at approximately 200 gpm (total combined yield), Well 3 at approximately 600 to 700 gpm and Well 5 at approximately 300 gpm. However, under normal operation, Wells 2 and 6 are on manual stand-by and Wells 3 and 5 are needed only when demand exceeds the water produced by Well 4 and the City's Ranney collector. _Treatment The new treatment plant for water collected in the Ranney collector was constructed and placed into service in April 1992. The treatment plant is located approximately 300 feet west of the City's Ranney Collector. The City's water treatment plant uses the Microfloc Contact Clarification-Filtration technology. This technology is classified as an alternative filtration technology under the State Surface Water Filtration and Disinfection Treatment Regulations (SWFDTR). Facilities include Prechlodnation, adsorption, clarification, mixed- media gravity filtration and disinfection. Wastewater generated from the water treatment plant is discharged to two 216,000-gallon clarification reservoirs for recycling. Treated water is pumped to the underground 135,000-gallon, baffled concrete clearwell for post chlorination. From the clearwell, the water is pumped into the distribution system via two vertical turbine pumps. Operation of the treatment plant is controlled through the use of a float valve in the 2.5 million-gallon distribution tank described below. Wells 2, 3, 4 and 5 are equipped with a gas chlorination facility. Because Well 6 is connected to Well 2, water can be chlorinated at Well 2. In addition, Well 4 is equipped with a continuous reading turbidimeter. Stora,qe And Distribution Five distribution reservoirs, with a combined storage capacity of 2.773 million gallons, provide treated water storage for the City's system. These include a 2.5 million-gallon concrete tank, a 100,000-gallon steel tank, two small redwood tanks (13,000 gallons and 23,000 gallons) and a 135,000-gallon concrete clearwell. The distribution system is divided into four pressure zones. The main zone (approximately 97 percent of the system) is served by gravity from the 2.5 million-gallon storage tank. This tank is supplied by all system sources via the main distribution system. Three other small zones are supplied by booster pump stations via the main distribution zone. Zone 2 is served by gravity from a 100,000-gallon storage tank. This zone is supplied bY the Golf Course booster pump at a rate of 545 gpm. Zone 3 which has three service connections is served by a 13,000-gallon redwobd storage tank. This zone is supplied by the Pamum Drive booster pump. Zone 4 which has four service connections is served by a 23,000-gallon redwood storage tank. 2-7 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Emer.qencv Plane __ The City has a Water Quality Emergency Notification Plan for use when it has been determined that an imminent danger to the health of the water users exists. Within the Notification Plan, City staff are directed to contact local radio and television stations and newspapers. If necessary, City staff are available to make door-to-door notifications during the hours that other media sources are not available to broadcast a waming. The City has also developed a water treatment plant disinfection failure emergency plan which describes the automatic shutdown of the chlorination system in the case of a malfunction. If the chlorination system cannot be rapidly repaired, the City can: 1. Start a manual auxiliary chlorinator, 2. Prechlorinate at the Ranney collector and manually chlorinate at the clear well if the water treatment plant is required, 3. Start groundwater wells with alternative dedicated chlorination system, and/or 4. Purchase water from the MCWD or the Willow Water District through the emergency intertie agreements. Although the City does not have a formal emergency plan in place in the event that water cannot be pumped from the river, the City would initiate either Option 3 or Option 4, described above, to provide water to its customers. 2.2.2 Millview County Water District MCWD was formed on 23 November 1956 to serve an area of approximately 5,000 acres north and northeast of the City of Ukiah. A five member Board of Directors was elected and bonds provided the initial funds to construct the original pump and distribution facilities. MCWD began selling water in January 1961 to 97 service connections. In 1986, MCWD constructed a treatment plant to filter water. As of December 1994, the MCWD provided service to a total of about 1,300 connections, all of which are metered. The population served is approximately 5,600. Most areas of the MCWD are on septic system wastewater disposal, except for the Alexander Estates Subdivision, with 372 water connections. Alexander Estates, which is northwest of downtown Ukiah near Lover's Lane, is provided sewage collection services by the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District. _Service Area The MCWD service area comprises approximately eight square miles north of Ukiah as shown on Figure 2-1. The MCWD service area includes light industrial customers as well as residential customers adjacent to Ukiah. Water Production According to the 1994 Annual Report to the DHS, the system produced 440.53 million gallons of treated water in 1994. The month of maximum production was in July when the ~:~~o~.~.oo~,~.,,,,,~,~ ~ 2-8 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants system produced 55.02 million gallons of water. The maximum daily production was 2.6 million gallons of treated water. Ail service connections are metered. According to the DHS Engineering Report dated January 1993, the needed source capacity for present use is 2 mgd based on the average daily production during the month of maximum production over 6 years. Sources Of Supply Surface Wa~er The MCWD obtains water from 20 shallow groundwater wells installed near the water treatment plant and 6- and 12-inch intake lines from the Russian River during the summer months. All water used is considered surface water or under the influence of surface water. In addition to the 20 active shallow groundwater wells, MCWD has three inactive wells (Wells 1, 2, and 6) which MCWD cannot use without a permit from DHS. The three inactive wells are 40 feet deep, are not equipped with pumps, and are surface sealed. The shallow groundwater wells are a minimum of 160 feet east of the fiver. Of the 20 active wells, two (Wells 4 and 5), are not actual wells but pumps installed inside a cement caisson 9 feet in diameter which extends approximately 28 feet bgs. Water gathers in the caisson from a collection system consisting of 100 feet of perforated pipe forming east and west laterals, which are buried adjacent to the fiver. The groundwater well field is in production all year. Water from the wells and caisson vault is conveyed through a 12-inch diameter PVC (well) manifold to the treatment plant. In addition to the 20 active shallow groundwater wells, 6- and 12-inch diameter intake lines extend into the Russian River. Russian River water is pumped through a new 6-inch intake line with a 15 horsepower (hp) pump to a recharge percolation pond used to recharge the well field during summer months. The recharge percolation pond is approximately 90 feet wide and 220 feet long and is located to the south of the shallow well field. Wells 9 and 11 through 29 are recharged by the pond and Well 3 may also be influenced by the pond. To meet peak demand, raw water is also pumped directly from the Russian River by a 15 hp pump from the new 12-inch raw water intake to the well manifold which serves the treatment plant. The pump and intake line were installed during July 1992 to replace a temporary 7.5 hp pump and 8-inch diameter intake line. All surface water and groundwater from shallow wells receive direct filtration treatment which is described in greater detail below. The river intake structure consists of a concrete structure measuring 8 feet square, located 4 to 5 feet below the surface of the Russian River. The intake line and the pumps are removed during the winter months. The fiver intake is only in operation during the high demand periods, normally from May through October. Treatment The treatment process for surface water is a direct filtration treatment process. All the water produced by the system is treated through the treatment plant. The treatment plant consists of a static mixer; a 60,000-gallon surge/contact tank; three filter pumps in parallel; four 4-cell, dual media, horizontal pressure filters (each 8-feet diameter by 28-feet long); a gas chlorination facility; a 90,000-gallon clearwell; a 170,000-gallon clearwell added in 2-9 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants December 1994; and three finished water booster pumps plumbed in parallel. In May 1992, the fourth filter was placed in service to increase the capacity of the treatment plant. _Stora.qe And Distribution Distribution storage is provided by eight steel tanks with a combined capacity of 2.045 million gallons. In 1996, MCWD is scheduled to replace the 20,000-gallon Upper Deerwood Tank with a tank capacity of approximately 200,000 gallons. All the storage tanks have common inlets/outlets. The water distribution system includes five pressure zones equipped with water pumps, pipelines, storage tanks, and the necessary appurtenances for serving water at proper pressure and volumes. The system consists of 33 miles of 3 to 14-inch pipe consisting of predominantly asbestos cement with a small amount (less than 5 percent) of steel pipe. Most of the line is reportedly in good condition. New pipes are 6-inch or 12-inch diameter PVC. The five pressure zones can be isolated from each other by operating gate valves. Pressure in the system varies between 30 to 125 psi. Zone 1 serves 1,175 connections and is supplied from the water treatment plant by three 50-hp high lift pumps through the distribution system to five storage tanks. Individual homes are then served by gravity from the storage tanks. Zone 2 serves 115 connections from the 53,000-gallon Deerwood Tank which is fed by a booster station in the Deerwood Park Subdivision. The booster station is located approximately 0.5 mile southeast from the treatment plant. Zone 3 serves 26 connections and is supplied by the 20,000-gallon Upper Deerwood Tank. The tank is served from the main distribution system by a 2 hp pump and a 1 hp backup pump. The Upper Deerwood Tank is scheduled to be replaced with an approximately 200,000-gallon tank in 1996. Zone 4 serves 30 connections and is a section of the Lower Deerwood Park Subdivision. Zone 4 receives its water from Zone 1 via a Zone 2 booster pump. The flow then goes through a pressure reducing valve into Zone 4. Zone 5 serves 3 connections and is supplied from the Upper Deerwood Tank in Zone 3. Zone 5 receives water through a pressure reducing valve that was installed on 15 May 1991, on a new main line at the end of the Deerwood Park Subdivision. Emer.qenc¥ Plan In the event of a chlorination failure at the MCWD treatment plant, alarms Will activate shutdown of the plant and operators will be notified via a 24-hour answering service. The MCWD has the four alternate plans to continue providing potable water to its customers: 1. Use an alternative chlorination system. 2. Purchase water from the City of Ukiah through a 600 gpm intertie. ~:~x~s.oo~,~~ ~ 2-10 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Sources Of Supply The sole source of water for the RVCWD is Lake Mendocino, which is considered a surface water source. The Russian River Project, a water diversion and storage project operated by the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA), includes the storage of water at Lake Mendocino on the East Fork of the Russian River. Much of the water appropriated for this use originates in the Eel River Watershed and is diverted to the East Fork PG&E Company through a hydroelectric power tunnel. The diverted water combines with water from the East Fork of the Russian River before entering Lake Mendocino. SCWA shares conservation space in Lake Mendocino with the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District (MCRRFC & WClD or MID). Storage in Lake Mendocino is referred to as Project Water. Together the two agencies have permits to store up to 122,500 acre feet per year (afy). Of this total, MID is entitled to divert up to 8,000 afy for consumptive use. In addition to the Project Water, users in Mendocino County are also entitled to an estimated 8,100 afy of water from flows in the Russian River and its tributaries based on pre-1949 use (i.e. before Lake Mendocino was built). Currently, the RVCWD has two legal rights to draw Project Water from Lake Mendocino. In April 1986, the State Department of Water Resources Control Board granted approval to the RVCWD for the withdrawal of 7,500 afy from the SCWA stored water in Lake Mendocino with the following restrictions: . . The RVCWD cannot withdraw any of the 7,500 acre feet when, as of April 1, Lake Pillsbury (which supplies Lake Mendocino) has not accumulated 50,000 acre feet of water. The RVCWD cannot withdraw any of the 7,500 acre-feet when, as of May 1, Lake Pillsbury has not accumulated 90,000 acre-feet. . If the RVCWD is prevented from withdrawing water based on either of the two foregoing restrictions, it cannot resume withdrawals until it demonstrates to the State Division of Water Rights that Lake Mendocino will not fall below 30,000 acre- feet of water. . If not already prevented from withdrawing water under any of the foregoing restrictions, anytime Lake Mendocino drops below 30,000 acre-feet, the RVCWD can withdraw only 50 percent of the average monthly diversion it made during the same month of the previous three years. During the months of May through October each year, the RVCWD's only effective legal entitlement to water is by a stipulated judgment entered 30 May 1980, in Mendocino County Superior Court between the RVCWD and MID. MID has a permit to consume 8,000 afy of the Russian River Project Water stored in Lake Mendocino. The court- approved judgement entitles RVCWD to purchase up to 4,000 acre-feet excess to the needs of MID from MID any part of the 8,000 acre-feet not used by MID. If there is no surplus water, RVCWD may not withdraw water. 2-12 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants In 1993, the system used approximately 2,020 acre-feet, of which approximately 720 acre feet was domestic use and 1,300 acre feet was used for irrigation. Intake Facilities The raw water intake structure and pump station is located on the west shore of Lake Mendocino at Winery Point at an elevation of 685 feet above MSL. The direct intake from the lake consists of three 500 hp pumps capable of pum~)ing a total of 13,000 gallons per minute. The intake pumps are operated alternately during off-peak hours. Typically, one pump at a time is operated in the winter, and two pumps are operated in July and August to meet the water demand. Water is pumped through a 30-inch diameter pipeline 3,000 feet long to a 70,000-gallon surge tank. From this tank, water flows by gravity through a 30-inch steel pipe for a distance of 4.5 miles to a raw water reservoir at Colony Ddve near the treatment plant. The 68 acre-foot raw water reservoir stores water for both agricultural and domestic purposes. The raw water flows from the raw water reservoir by gravity to the treatment plant. Treatment of raw water consists of prechlorination, a coagulant feeder and a flash mixer, two solids-contact type clarifiers for chemical flocculation, three single cell mixed media pressure filters and disinfection. The flow rate through the treatment plant varies throughout the year and is adjusted for demand, but typically runs continuously for a pedod of approximately 16 hours per day (10:00 am to 2:00 am). The range of plant flows is from a Iow of 450 gpm in the winter to a maximum of 1,000 gpm in the summer. These flow rates are controlled manually according to demand. Stora.qe And Distribution The domestic system has three finished water distribution reservoirs, with a total capacity of 850,000 gallons. Characteristics of these reservoirs are summarized in Table 2-4. As described earlier, the RVCWD has two entirely separate water distribution systems. One provides the raw water for irrigation and the other system provides treated water for domestic use. The untreated water for agricultural uses may be provided from either the raw water reservoir or from a split on the transmission pipe pdor to entedng the holding pond. The treated water distribution system has two pressure zones with the pdmary zone (Zone 1) covedng 96 percent of the total connections. The smaller zone serves 40 connections and is served by a new pump station near Tomki Road which pumps from the pdmary zone. The East Tank feeds the distribution system and the West and North Tanks by gravity. If there is a pressure drop in the system, the West and North tanks also feed directly into the distribution system. There are several large customers in the RVCWD service area, including two wineries, mobile hom. e parks, and several schools. About 85 percent of the piping in the distribution system is 6-inch to 12-inch diameter asbestos cement pipe while the remainder is 6-inch to 12-inch diameter PVC C-900 pipe. There is also some 2-inch PVC pipe. 2-13 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Ememenc¥ Plan The RVCWD has an Emergency Notification Plan whereby a designated employee is on standby duty dudng all non-office hours. In addition, the RVCWD employs a 24-hour answering service so that all emergency calls can be forwarded to the designated employee. Any emergencies requiring customer notification will be done through local radio stations, newspapers, and by telephone of individual customers. In instances of emergency water conservation, service to bulk domestic customers and irrigation customers will be turned off. 2-14 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 3 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES IN THE WATERSHEDS 3.1 SURVEY METHODS This sanitary survey for the Russian River and Upper Main Eel River Watersheds was conducted partially through the review of available information from various agencies including: · City of Ukiah · Millview County Water District · Redwood Valley County Water District · City of Ukiah Community Development Department · Mendocino County Environmental Health Department · Mendocino County Planning Department · Mendocino County Agricultural Commissioner · Mendocino County Water Agency · Lake County Planning Department · U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service · Sotoyome-Santa Rosa Resource Conservation District · U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service - Mendocino National Forest · U.S. Geological Survey · U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · California Department of Fish and Game · California Department of Forestry · California Department of Health Services · California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) · Califomia Highway Patrol · Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board- North Coast Region · Potter Valley Irrigation District · California Northern Railroad · Calpella County Water District Information was obtained from existing reports, maps, public agency file documents, personal interviews and telephone conversations. Also, Kennedy/Jenks conducted a field survey of the Lake Pillsbury and Upper Russian River Watersheds on 18 and 19 August 1995 to further investigate previously identified contaminants and identify additional potential contaminants within the watershed areas. 3.2 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES This section describes the potential contaminants which were identified within the tributary watershed areas. The locations of these potential sources are shown on Plate 1. The relative significance of these potential contaminant sources is discussed in the remainder of this section. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 3.2.1 Wastewater Wastewater Treatment Facilities/Disposal To Land There are severei municipal and industrial wastewater treatment facilities upstream or near the water intakes for the three water purveyors. The municipal wastewater service areas for the Calpella County Water District (CCVVD), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's (USACOE) Lake Mendocino facility, and the City of Ukiah/Ukiah Valley Sanitation District are shown on Figure 3-1. In addition, there are individual industrial wastewater treatment facilities north of the Ukiah city limits at Masonite Corporetion and the Louisiana Pacific (LP)-Ukiah Lumber Mill. Not all of the facilities have discharges that impact the water supply intakes. Each facility is described in greater detail below. The CCWD's wastewater treatment facility is upstream of both the MCWD's and City of Ukiah's intakes. The CCWD's wastewater treatment plant was built in the late 1950s and rebuilt in 1981 and consists of two mechanically aerated lagoons with percolation/evaporation disposal and is opereted and maintained by the CCVVD. The plant serves about 80 connections in the Calpella community and has a capacity of 40,000 gpd with an average dry weather flow of 36,000 gpd. The CCWD also receives domestic wastewater from the LP Calpella Chipping facility. Sludges from the plant are dried and applied as a soil amendment to nearby vineyard lands. According to the CCWD, there are no problems with the plant; effluent limits are achieved and no unauthorized discharges have occurred. The CCVVD is in the process of increasing the hydraulic capacity to about 120,000 gpd. The CCWD's emergency plan includes notification of downstream water purveyors in case of any spills to the Russian River. The USACOE Lake Mendocino recreation facility has a 20,000 gpd package wastewater treatment plant with five oxidation and percolation ponds to serve the picnic and camping areas on the north and west sides of the lake. When Lake Mendocino is at its highest level, the ponds are about 100 feet away from the lake. There have been no reported problems with the treatment plant and no unauthorized discharges have occurred. Other camping and picnic areas are served with either holding tanks or septic tank/leachfield systems. The USACOE facility is upstream of all three water purveyors. The Ukiah Valley Sanitation District and the City of Ukiah operete a wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system for most of the City and adjacent areas including the Lover's Lane area, and the El Doredo Estates and the Vichy Springs areas that are both on the east side of the Russian River. However, the discharge from the City's system is located downstream of its water supply intake as shown on Figure 3-1. Other areas of the Ukiah Valley are served by septic tanldleachfield systems and are described in greater detail below. The Georgia-Pacific Resins facility produces thermosetting resins. Domestic wastewaters are discharged to the City's wastewater system. Industrial wastewaters including boiler blowdown and cooling tower waters are stored in above ground tanks and tested prior to release into the City's system. Stormwater discharges are discussed in Section 3.2.3 (Urban Runoff). The Georgia Pacific facility is upstream of the City of Ukiah's Ranney collector and downstream of MCWD's and RVCWD's intakes. January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants The Masonite Corporation operates a wet process hardboard manufacturing facility under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Domestic and industrial wastewaters and stormwater from the facility are treated in a secondary treatment plant with a 2.22 mgd capacity which was constructed in 1975. Under normal conditions, two-thirds of the treated wastewater is recycled through the industrial process while the excess wastewater is spray irrigated on hayfields near the plant. The treated wastewaters can also be discharged to the Russian River from 1 October to 4 May of each year when there is at least a 100:1 dilution factor of river water to wastewater. January 1995 was the first time in eight years that Masonite Corporation discharged treated wastewater to the Russian River. Stormwater discharges from the Masonite Corporation facility parking lot are discussed in Section 3.2.3 (Urban Runoff). The Masonite Corporation facility is upstream of the City of Ukiah's Ranney collector and downstream of MCWD's and RVCWD's intakes. Septic/Vault Systems With the exception of the areas described above which have wastewater treatment/disposal systems, the remainder of the watershed area uses septic systems or vault systems for wastewater disposal. These systems are scattered throughout the watershed areas. Areas with septic tanks within the study area include Redwood Valley, Potter Valley, and the Lake Pillsbury Watershed. The installation and permitting of the septic systems are regulated by the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department, the Lake County Health Department, and the RWQCB. According to the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department, no major system failures have occurred in the areas upstream of the City's Ranney collector, although the Deerwood area of the Ukiah Valley has had a higher than average number of septic tank/leachfield repairs. The City has a Wastewater Collection and Treatment Services Feasibility Study (Kennedy/Jenks 1994) which has an extended service area that includes wastewater collection service to the Deerwood area. However, the City does not have a projected schedule for expansion into the extended service area. All wastewater treatment within the Lake Pillsbury Watershed occurs through septic tanks and leachfields or vault systems. Many of the National Forest campgrounds use vault systems for wastewater disposal. These systems consist of lined vaults which are regularly pumped out by vacuum trucks. The private Lake Pillsbury Resort has a septic tank and leachfield to treat and dispose of the wastewater generated at its campground and cabins. Refer to Section 3.2.12 for additional information on recreational use of the watershed. The Louisiana Pacific-Ukiah Lumber Mill operates a lumber mill and wood-preserving operation. Its domestic wastewater is treated in an onsite septic tank/leachfield system. Boiler blowdown water for its industrial operation flows to a percolation pit which overflows into Hensley Creek and then into the Russian River. Stormwater discharges are discussed in Section 3.2.3 in the Urban Runoff portion of this section. 3.2.2 Reclaimed Water No water reclamation projects currently exist within the watersheds. 3-3 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 3.2.3 Urban Runoff The urbanized portions of the watershed consist primarily of the areas around the City of Ukiah where there are residential, commercial, and industrial land uses. The RWQCB has issued National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for stormwater discharge to about 20 industrial facilities in the watershed areas including facilities such as vineyards, wood pallet manufacturers, and other wood products facilities, auto repair and dismantling facilities, bulk fuel distributors, and rock crushing and screening plants. Most of the facilities are small and the RWQCB does not regulate all facilities within these categories in the watershed areas. The largest industrial facilities are the LP Ukiah lumber mill, LP Calpella chipping facility, Georgia Pacific Resins, and Masonite Corporation. The LP Ukiah lumber mill generates stormwater runoff from its heavy equipment maintenance shop, sprinkled log deck, and wood preserving facility. Runoff from the maintenance shop and other paved areas drain to a sump, then to a tank, then to a filtration/fiocculation treatment facility, and finally to a percolation pond. Log deck runoff flows to a pond through screens and three skimmers then to Hensley Creek that flows to the Russian River. Log deck runoff is recycled to the keep the logs damp and is also used as a fire pond dudng the summer months. There have been reported instances of bypass of stormwater to Hensley Creek dudng pedods of high precipitation. The RWQCB requires LP Ukiah to monitor potential discharges into Hensley Creek and the Russian River for total copper, hexavalent chromium, and arsenic. The LP Calpella chipping facility has two ponds for its log-deck runoff. Prior to entedng the ponds, the runoff flows through two skimmer/separators to remove bark and other large solids. The ponds have overflows into the Russian River dudng pedods of high precipitation. The RWQCB does not currently have waste discharge requirements or monitoring requirements on the LP Calpella chipping facility. Most of the stormwater from the Georgia Pacific Resins facility flows into a stormwater detention basin. Under normal conditions, the runoff is reused or evaporated. In periods of high precipitation, the detention basin can overflow into a ditch which flows to the Russian River. There is some stormwater from the parking lot and nearby areas which is regulated under a NPDES permit that flows into drainages to the Russian River. Runoff to the Russian River only occurs during periods of high precipitation. Under its RWQCB waste discharge requirements, Georgia-Pacific monitors water quality during these occasions for formaldehyde, pH, total organic carbon, kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate, conductivity and tannin and lignin. In addition, Georgia-Pacific maintains inventories of epichlorohydrin, urea, acetone, ammonia, caustic soda, various amines, aldehydes, alcohols, acids, and aromatic compounds for the manufacture of thermosetting resins. Chemicals at Georgia Pacific are stored with secondary containment, minimizing spill risks. Stormwater runoff from the parking lot at the Masonite Corporation is the only stormwater that is not treated. It is, however, regulated under a NPDES permit and monitored when discharges occur. In accordance with its NPDES permit, the discharge is monitored for biological oxygen demand (BOD), nonfilterable residue (suspended solids), settleable solids, total coliform organisms, chlorine residual, hydrogen ion concentrations, phenols, grease and oil, nickel, tributyltin, and zinc. January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 3.2.4 Agricultural Crop Land Use Agriculture is a major part of the economy of the Russian River portion of the watershed. The potential risks to water quality associated with the agricultural cultivation are increased erosion, loss of topsoil, and use of pesticides and herbicides. The Ukiah, Redwood, and Potter Valleys all have significant acreage in cultivation as delineated in Table 3-1. It should be noted that acreage in the Ukiah Valley include areas downstream of the City's Ranney collector. The information in Table 3-1 for Ukiah and Redwood Valleys is based on discussions With the Mendocino County Agricultural Commissioner. The information for Potter Valley is from the Potter Valley Irrigation District. Agricultural cultivation is not a significant land-use in the Upper Main Eel River Watershed. A discussion of pesticide/herbicide is provided in Section 3.2.7. 3.2.5 Grazing Animals There are several areas within the watersheds where animals (primarily cattle and horses) are allowed to graze. Grazing occurs on both private lands (ranches) and on National Forest lands on Grazing Allotment Areas. There are an estimated 1,300 head of cattle grazing on private lands within Potter Valley (PVID 1995). Quantitative estimates on grazing in Ukiah and Redwood Valleys were not available. There is some grazing in Redwood Valley but to a lesser extent than in Potter Valley. There are no grazing allotments on National Forest lands within the Lake Pillsbury watershed. 3.2.6' Concentrated Animal Facilities No concentrated animal facilities (i.e., daides, feedlots) exist within the watersheds. 3.2.7 Pesticide/Herbicide Use As a result of the agricultural activity in the Russian River portion of the watershed, pesticides and herbicides are used within the watershed. Since 1989, individual farmers submit monthly reports to the Mendoclno County Agricultural Commissioner on the amounts of controlled pesticide and herbicide use. The Agricultural Commissioner indicated that pear cultivation requires the most pesticide use of all the crops grown in the area. Growers generally apply pesticides from the ground with limited aerial applications. Vineyards often use sulfur dust, and to a lesser extent, copper dust for pest control. Banned pesticides and herbicides, included heavy metals such as lead arsenate and mercury; and organochlorides such at DDT, chlordane, lindane, toxaphene, and others. The Agricultural Commissioner's office aggressively enforced the pesticide/herbicide ban by visiting all stores in the county that may market the banned chemicals to ensure they were not available. Currently, pesticide/herbicide use is primarily for the cultivation of grapes and pears. The most common pesticides/herbicides are organophosphates such as Guthion and Imidon; :3-5 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants _ pydthroids such as Pounce and Asana; and bactericides such as streptomycin, copper, and sulfur. Fertilizers in use in the county include urea and lime. Many growers in the upper Russian River Watershed adhere to organic growing practices which limits pesticide, herbicide and fertilizer use. The Agricultural Commissioner estimates that approximately 99 percent of all vegetables, 10 percent of all pears, and 20 percent of all wine grapes are grown organically within Mendocino County. Use of pesticides and herbicides in the National Forest areas is limited to occasional applications of the pesticide Senin to individual sugar pine trees against bark beetle infestation. 3.2.8 Wild Animals Several species of animals live within the watersheds. Animals commonly found in the watersheds include deer, bobcat, fox, coyotes, rabbits, chipmunks, squirrels, mice, raccoons, porcupines and many species of bird, including golden and bald eagles. The California Department of Fish and Game indicated that beavers and muskrats are not expected to inhabit the watershed areas because the habitats for these animals do not typically occur in the area's creeks and rivers. This is most likely due to the seasonal flow characteristics of the creeks in the watersheds. 3.2.9 Mine Runoff According to the RWQCB the only known active mining in the watershed areas is sand and gravel mining in Redwood and Ukiah Valleys. Sand and gravel mining can result in elevated levels of sediments and turbidity. Past mining of mercury appears to have resulted in mercury accumulation in the flesh of fish from Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino according to RWQCB staff and its studies. Although there has been no actual sampling conducted, RWQCB staff suspects that mineral springs in the Lake Pillsbury Watershed and an old mine in the inundated area of Lake Pillsbury may be the source of the mercury. If present, sediments containing mercury could be transported via the Eel/Russian River system to Lake Mendocino. It should be noted that mercury is highly insoluble in water and probably does not pose a problem to drinking water quality. 3.2.10 Solid And Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities No solid waste or hazardous waste disposal facilities currently operate within the watersheds. The Ukiah Landfill, where solid wastes from the watershed areas are disposed of, is downstream of all intakes. 3.2.11 Logging The California Department of Forestry (CDF) monitors logging activities on the state and private lands within the Russian River and Upper Main Eel River Watersheds. Timber harvests of 2 to 1,000 acres are regularly permitted by CDF with most cuts occurring in the Upper Main Eel River Watershed. CDF stipulates conditions under which the timber harvest can occur including mitigation for potential water quality impacts such as providing buffer zones near streams, and implementation of best management practices (BMPs). January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Based on an analysis of CDF maps and records, the approximate acreage logged in the Russian River and Eel River Watersheds during the period of 1990-1994, is 2,400 acres in the Russian River Watershed and 740 acres in the Eel River Watershed. The U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USDAFS) manages logging activities on federal lands within the Upper Main Eel River Watershed. In its Forest Management Plan, the USDAFS indicates that the proposed future logging activities are limited and must adhere to BMPs. 3.2.12 Recreational Use Several recreational areas exist within the watershed areas. These areas are operated by the USDAFS and a private operator near Lake Pillsbury, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at Lake Mendocino. Lake Pillsbury Recreation Facilities The USDAF$ operates several campgrounds and picnic areas within the Lake Pillsbury Watershed including the Sunset, Pogie Point, Fuller Grove, and Oak Flat campgrounds and the Squaw Creek Picnic Area. The number of visitors admitted to National Forest campgrounds and wilderness areas is limited. The campsites and picnic grounds generally have restroom facilities with lined vaults which are regularly pumped out. In addition, there is a boat ramp near the Fuller Grove campground. Lake Pillsbury has both non-body contact and body-contact recreation which can pose threats to water quality. The USDAFS does not maintain records for use of the Lake Pillsbury facilities; instead, its recreational use estimates encompass the entire Mendocino National Forest. Data collected by PG&E in 1986 indicate a peak weekend boat count of about 130 boats in the basin and a 1986 Memorial Day vehicle count found 914 vehicles in the Lake Pillsbury area. The vehicles were distributed with 39 percent at the three USDAFS campgrounds, 11 percent at Lake Pillsbury Resort, 28 percent in the Lake Pillsbury basin, 13 percent along the Eel River, and 9 percent were off-highway vehicles (USDAFS 1995b). The USDAFS also allows what is known as "dispersed use" wherein individuals are allowed to hike and camp in remote areas of the National Forest lands. Most of the dispersed use is on a daily basis. Guidelines for sanitation and trash disposal are provided to dispersed users. The USDAFS also has designated areas for the use of off highway vehicles (OHVs) in the Lake Pillsbury Watershed. These areas are throughout the watershed area near the established OHV trails and roads. Use of these areas is limited to certain types of vehicles with spark arrestors. In addition to the USDAFS recreation area, the Lake Pillsbury Resort operates a private small campground, cabin rental, and marina on the west shore of Lake Pillsbury. The resort has a septic tank and leachfield for wastewater disposal and has three aboveground tanks containing 1,000 gallons and 4,000 gallons of gasoline and 1,000 gallons of diesel. All of the tanks are surrounded by containment berms. The resort does not collect facility use data. 3-7 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants U.S. Army COE Recreation Area_~ The U.S. Army COE Lake Mendocino facility operates several campgrounds and picnic areas within the Russian River Watershed area including Pomo, Ky-En, BuShay, Miff, and Che-ka-ka campgrounds and the Bita and Che-ka-ka picnic areas. These campgrounds and picnic areas have toilet and/or shower facilities. Lake Mendocino also has boat ramps and marina facilities. Wastewater treatment and disposal for these facilities are described above. Similar to Lake Pillsbury, both non-body contact and body contact recreations occur at Lake Mendocino, which can pose threats to water quality. The average number of annual users over the past four years (1991-1994) is 523,775 per year (using data provided by the U.S. Army COE). The average number of user per year has gradually decreased over the period of 1991-1994. 3.2.13 Unauthorized Activity According to the County and National Forest staffs, no known illegal dump sites exist and no known incidents of illegal activities have occurred within the watersheds. 3.2.14 Underground Fuel Storage Tanks There are many underground fuel storage tanks within the watersheds, particularly in and near Ukiah. The tanks are permitted and regulated by the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department. According to Health Department staff, the tanks are in compliance with applicable regulations. In addition, the RWQCB monitors cleanup of leaking underground storage tank sites. According to the RWQCB, there are no known leaking underground tank sites that pose a threat to surface water. 3.2.15 Traffic ACcidents/Spills The Highway 101 corridor, other state highways, and the California Northern Railroad are potential sources of contaminants to the Russian River from spills. For about six miles, Highway 101 is within 1,000 feet of the Russian River at several locations north of Ukiah and near Calpella. Highway 20 crosses the Russian River near Calpeila and continues along the East Fork Russian River upstream of Lake Mendocino for about 4 miles. The railroad runs along the Russian River from Ukiah to Redwood Valley for about 6 miles. In 1986, the RWQCB prepared a report entitled "Storage, Transport and Spills of Hazardous Materials in the Russian River Basin", which documented that five spills that occurred between 1974 to May 1984 upstream of Ukiah. Of the documented spills, the only one known to have entered surface waters was the result of a vandalized rail car in 1982. The RWQCB report has not been updated. However, discussions with County, Caltrans and other officials has not revealed other spills that have entered surface waters. The 1986 RWQCB report also contained the results of a survey conducted by RWQCB staff at the Cloverdale California Highway Patrol Truck Inspection Station for a 5-day period in April 1986. The results of the RWQCB survey indicate that an estimated 500,000 gallons of motor fuel was being transported northbound from Cloverdale during the 5-day period. The motor fuel represented over 80 percent of all liquid hazardous materials being transported northbound in tank cars. Other liquid hazardous materials included fuel oil, l:~job~95'~950035.1:X:Nl~~ doc January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants formaldehyde, caustic soda, spent sulfuric acid, calcium hypochlodte, anhydrous ammonia, and oxidizer which amounted to a total of 117,000 gallons dudng the 5-day period. These quantities do not represent nighttime and weekend traffic but are the best data available. Caltrans traffic counts for 1983 and 1993 indicate that there has been little change in the number of trucks that pass through the Ukiah area. In 19~3, Caltrans estimated that the Truck Annual Average Daily Total (TAADT) was 1,716 and in 1993, the TAADT was 1,689. The RWQCB's report documented transportation by rail of hazardous materials dudng 1982 and 1983 where chemicals used in resin manufacturing and fuel oils represented the largest proportion of hazardous materials. In 1982, 2.48 million gallons of resin-related chemicals and 1.132 million gallons of fuel oils were transported. These amounts decreased in 1983 to 1.75 million gallons of resin-related chemicals and 0.458 million gallons of fuel oils. According to the California Northern Railroad (CNRR) which has operated the rail line since 1993, lumber products represents up to 85 percent of all materials transported by rail. CNRR noted that resin deliveries by railroad to Georgia-Pacific Resins was 450,000 gallons in 1993, 340,000 gallons in 1994, and 450,000 gallons for the first 6 months of 1995. Fuel oil is no longer transported by rail because of a restriction along the Eel River. Masonite Corporation receives about 540,000 gallons/year of linseed oil for its manufacturing process. The CNRR maintains an extensive emergency response plan that includes notification of the appropriate water departments in the event of a spill. There have been no known vandalism-related or other spills from the railroad since 1982. 3.2.16 Groundwater Which Influences Surface Water Quality There are several spdngs in the watershed areas; however, the quantity of the water from these springs is limited and their influence on the surface water quality in the area is not considered significant. In addition, as noted earlier, none of the leaking underground storage tank cases being tracked by the RWQCB appear to be impacting surface water quality. 3.2.17 Seawater Intrusion Seawater intrusion is not a potential contaminant within the watersheds. 3.2.18 Geologic Hazards Several types of geologic hazards may exist within the watersheds, including earthquakes and landslides. As discussed previously, the majodty of the watersheds are quite steep and have encountered changing land uses including cattle grazing which has resulted in potentially high levels of soil erosion. Landslides are particularly common in areas of Franciscan mudstone formations and near areas of road cuts, ponds, reservoirs, land cieadng, and high velocity water flows from the Eel River diversion (SCS 1991). Soil erosion does occur dudng and after large storm events. In these instances, if the resulting turbidity in the creeks is too high, the water treatment plants shut down. It should be noted that previous studies for the City of Ukiah indicated that the Upper Main Eel River Watershed is the source of the fine colloidal size sediment that results in high turbidity in 3-9 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants the Russian River (Kennedy Engineers 1976). There are not historical records of specific earthquakes, landslides, or mudslides that have affected the water supply quality. 3.2.19 Fires Fires in the watershed areas are of two types: wildfires and prescribed (controlled) bums. The areas in which wild fires have occurred are shown on Plate 1. The Cow Mountain fire occurred in the Russian River Watershed in the early 1980s. Sediment loads increase somewhat after these events but turbidity generally cleared quickly. The degree of erosion mitigation response conducted after a wildfire depends on how much vegetation was removed, soil type, steepness of slope, and other factors. California Department of Forestry (CDF) indicated that it did not provide any response to the Cow Mountain fire. CDF can assist with aerial seeding, haying, and other slope stabilization techniques. In order to minimize the risk for wildfires, the USDAFS and the CDF conduct prescribed (controlled) bums in the late spring and early summer. The USDAFS conducts some controlled bums for site preparation and understory fuel control. The areas that are bumed are often scattered and dispersed throughout the watersheds. The acreage can be around 8,000 acres, of which approximately five percent is actually burned. CDF works with the Bureau of Land Management and private landowners to design projects that minimize erosion, reduce the fuel hazard, and increase wildlife and water yields on projects ranging from 2 to 12,000 acres. Of the total acreage, the area burned may be from 25 to 50 percent. 3.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES Based on the limited existence of potential contaminants within the Russian River and Upper Lake Pillsbury Watersheds, the watersheds have relatively few contaminants which are considered significant. It should be noted that Lake Pillsbury offers detention storage for all three water purveyors and Lake Mendocino offers detention storage for the MCWD and the City of Ukiah. Detention storage offers opportunities to react to spills and other contaminants as well as providing dilution to the contaminant concentrations. Table 3-2 provides a summary of the relative significance of each of the potential contaminant sources described above. 3.4 ANTICIPATED GROWTH WITHIN THE WATERSHED Because most of the land within the Lake Pillsbury Watershed is within National Forest land, growth within that watershed is limited and major changes in land use are unlikely. The land within the Russian River Watershed, although primarily under private ownership, is also unlikely to encounter major changes in land use because of the value that residents place on the rural lifestyle and the limitations that the hillsides put on large-scale development. Based on discussions with the Mendocino County Planning Department and the City's Community Development Department, there are some small acreage land-use changes that are being proposed. LP Ukiah is proposing to change 24 acres from agricultural to industrial land-use for a chipping plant. All other industrial facilities will probably be developed in existing industrial areas. 3-10 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 3.5 PROJECTED CHANGES IN SOURCES OF CONTAMINANTS As discussed above, land use within the watersheds is not anticipated to significantly change and the potential for growth is limited. Therefore, there is not expected to be a significant change in the types of contaminants within the watersheds. However, growth in the surrounding areas may cause increased use of the watershed's recreational and open space resources. This could potentially impact the significance of certain contaminants within the watershed as shown in Table 3-3. January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 4 WATERSHED CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 4.1 WATER PURVEYORS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 4.1.1 City Of Ukiah The City provides water service to the service area within its City limits as described in Section 2.0. The City is governed by a five-member elected Council. The management and operation of the water supply system is conducted by the Director of Public Utilities and the Water/Sewer Operations Superintendent. The Water/Sewer Operations Superintendent oversees the day-to-day operations of: · Field Operations - Water treatment plant operation - Water quality monitoring - Plan checking · Office Operations - Administrative - Drafting support services · Water System Construction and Maintenance 4.1.2 Millview County Water District The MCWD is governed by a five-member elected Board of Directors. The management and operation of the MCWD is conducted by the General Manager who oversees the following MCWD operations: · Field Operations - Water treatment plant operation - Water quality monitoring - Meter readings - Plan checking · Office Operations - Administrative - Billing - Public relations · Water System Construction and Maintenance 4.1.3 Redwood Valley County Water District The RVCWD is governed by a five-member elected Board of Directors. The management and operation of the RVCWD is conducted by the General Manager who oversees the following RVCWD operations: Field Operations - Water treatment plant operation - Water quality monitoring - Meter readings - Plan checking 4-1 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants - Irrigation system operations · Office Operations - Administrative - Billing - Public relations · Water System Construction and Maintenance 4.1.4 Watershed Operations As discussed in Section 2.0, the City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD operate and maintain diversion, conveyance and treatment facilities for their respective service areas. The City obtains water from its Ranney collector in the Russian River and from groundwater, the MCWD obtains water from its intakes and shallow wells in and near the Russian River and from groundwater, and the RVCWD obtains water from Lake Mendocino. Ali three water purveyors obtain surface water that originates from both the Upper Main Eel River Watershed and the Russian River Watershed. The water purveyors own none of the watershed areas and therefore have no direct management control over the activities in the watersheds. The majodty of the Upper Main Eel River Watershed is managed by the USDAFS and the majodty of the Russian River Watershed land is privately held. If an accidental release of contaminants occurs within the Upper Main Eel River Watershed, the City and MCWD would have time to be alerted to the emergency because of the storage in Lake Pillsbury and in Lake Mendocino. RVCWD's water quality would be at a higher risk from an accidental release within the Upper Main Eel River Watershed because its intake is from Lake Mendocino. 4.1.5 Inspection~And Surveillance Of The Watershed Within the Upper Main Eel River Watershed, National Forest personnel continually monitor the high use areas of the watershed such as the campgrounds and recreation areas. As discussed in Section 5.0, the MCWD conducts weekly water quality monitoring of its raw water intake from the Russian River for the presence and absence of total and fecal coliform bacteria. In addition, the RVCWD conducts monthly influent monitoring of total coliform bacteria. No other regular monitoring of surface water in the watershed is conducted. 4.2 OTHER AGENCIES WITH WATERSHED CONTROL AUTHORITY Numerous other agencies have management or control authority within the Upper Main Eel and Russian River Watersheds. The agencies are listed below for each watershed. · Upper Main Eel Watershed - Mendocino National Forest - Lake County (various departments and divisions) - RWQCB · Russian River Watershed - Mendocino County (various departments and divisions) - RWQCB 4-2 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants - Mendocino County Water Agency - City of Ukiah (within City limits only) - Soil Conservation Service These agencies have adopted policies, guidelines, and plans for the protection of the resources within the watersheds. A brief description of each agency's policies, guidelines, and plans follows. In addition, summaries of specific subject areas such as recreation and erosion control follow the agency descriptions. 4.2.1 National Forest Plans And Policies The USDAFS has developed the Mendocino National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (MNFLRMP) for the protection of natural resources within the National Forest area. The MNFLRMP contains Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives which are summarized as follows: · Maintain watershed features to ensure protection of the aquatic systems. Maintain and restore water quality to support healthy dpadan, aquatic, and wetland ecosystems. Water quality must remain within the range that maintains the biological, physical, and chemical integrity of the system. · Maintain and restore the sediment regime under which aquatic ecosystems evolve. Maintain and restore the timing, variability, and duration of floodplain inundation and water table elevation in meadows and wetlands. Maintain and restore the species composition and structural diversity of plant communities in riparian areas and wetlands to provide adequate nutrient filtering, and appropriate rates of surface erosion and bank erosion. Table 4-1 summarizes some of the MNFLRMP's other policies associated with watershed protection. The USDAFS has adopted BMPs for several activities for the protection of natural resources within the forest. The BMPs are documented in the USDAFS' Water Quality Management for National Forest System Lands in Califomia. This document describes the practices, objectives, explanations and implementation guidelines for the following activities: · Timber harvesting · Road and building site construction · Mining · Recreation · Vegetative manipulation · Fire suppression and fuels management · Watershed management · Grazing January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants -, 4.2.2 Lake County General Plan Policies Most of the Upper Main Eel Watershed area is located within Lake County. However, because a significant portion of watershed is within the National Forest, Lake County agencies have jurisdiction over only a small portion of the private lands. Most of Lake County's activities within the watershed are related to onsite sanitation systems. There is no specific mention of the Upper Main Eel Watershed or Lake Pillsbury in the Lake County General Plan. 4.2.3 Mendocino County General Plan Policies Portions of the Upper Main Eel River Watershed and all of the Upper Russian River Watershed are located within Mendocino County. The Mendocino County General Plan acknowledges the value of watershed level planning efforts and has divided the County into watersheds. However, the General Plan also notes that the present plan is based on previous planning areas, and political and demographic data that may not be organized on a watershed basis. The Mendocino County General Plan is currently in transition to a watershed-level organization. As described Section 2.1.2, the portions of the watersheds in Mendocino County are predominantly agricultural, range land, or rural residential land uses. The following requirements apply to these land uses: :. · Sewage disposal must meet the standards of the Mendocino County Health Department and the North Coast RWQCB. Intended uses are for residential, agricultural, and processing and development of natural resources for parcels greater than 40 acres and small-scale farming and Iow density agricultural/residential land uses for parcels from 1 to 40 acres. Agricultural lands have a minimum parcel size of 40 acres, range-lands have a minimum parcel size of 160 acres, remote residential land parcels can be 20- or 40- acres, and rural residential parcels can be 40,000 square feet (0.9 acre), 80,000 square feet (1.8 acres), 5 acres or 10 acres. Other land-use classifications that are not within a water or sewer district, have a minimum parcel size of 40,000 square feet. The land-use element of the General Plan also has goals for soil resources and water resources. Among the County's primary soil resources goals are: · Reduce soil loss in order to maintain productivity of the soil resource and reduce sediment pollution. · Minimize erosion from all projects undertaken by the County. · Prevent and stabilize streambank erosion. 4-4 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Similarly, the water quality goals in the County's General Plan are: · Assure that wastewater disposal from development will not contaminate the ground water or surface water, on either a site-specific or cumulative basis. · Seek land management practices which will most effectively reduce water pollution. · Protect ground and surface waters from contamination by industrial wastes, particularly toxic substances. The County intends to implement these goals for soil and water resources by working with existing agencies such as Mendocino County Resource Conservation District, SCS, U.C. Cooperative Extension, and California Department of Forestry for technical assistance and financial resources. The County intends to ensure that the goals are met in any County programs. In addition to the land-use controls that can be used in watershed management, the Mendocino County General Plan has an open space-conservation element which specifically addresses water issues. The objectives of this water element are to: "Identify and conserve dvers, streams, watersheds, coastal areas, harbors, estuaries, reservoirs, potential reservoirs, and lands adjacent thereto which are especially important for water supply, recreation, fish and shellfish production, scientific study or scenic value. The County should be watchful that its potential future water needs not be compromised by short-sighted regional agreements" In addition, this element states: "Identify and conserve all areas necessary for the protection of water quality. Set performance standards for industry.' The Mendocino County General Plan states that implementation of these water and water quality objectives should be through the zoning ordinances and the Mendocino County Comprehensive Soil and Water Plan. Mendocino County also funds the activities of the local Resource Conservation District (RCD) which carries out soil conservation and management activities. The RCD in turn relies on the local SCS office for additional technical assistance. 4.2.4 RWQCB Waste Discharge Requirements Waste discharge requirements within the Upper Main Eel and Russian River Watersheds are regulated by the North Coast RWQCB. The types of facilities within the watersheds that have waste discharge requirements are: industrial facilities such as lumber mills, wood preserving, and hardboard manufacturers; wastewater treatment facilities; and stormwater discharges. 4-5 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants The RWQCB has adopted waste discharge requirements for the following facilities within the watershed: · Louisiana-Pacific Wood Treating and Sawmill- Ukiah · Masonite Corporation Hardboard Manufacturing- Ukiah · Georgia-Pacific Resin Manufacturing - Ukiah · USCOE Lake Mendocino Recreation Facility Wastewater Treatment Plant- Lake Mendocino · Calpella County Water District Wastewater Treatment Plant - Calpella In addition, stormwater discharges from a total of 17 facilities in the Russian River Watershed upstream of the City's Ranney collector are subject to RWQCB waste discharge requirements. It should be noted that not all facilities that have a similar function such as vineyards or gravel quarry have waste discharge requirements. In the Potter Valley, there is one facility that manufactures wood palettes that has stormwater requirements. In the Redwood Valley, there is one quarry and two vineyards that have stormwater requirements. In the Ukiah Valley upstream of the City's Ranney collector, there are 13 facilities that have stormwater requirements including the timber-related industries listed above, some auto repair and wrecking yards, a bulk fueling facility, and other light industrial facilities. Septic systems within the watersheds are permitted and regulated by the Lake and Mendocino County Environmental Health Departments. Septic system siting (vicinity to water sources), and design and construction standards are established by the RWQCB under its "Policy on Control of Water Quality with Respect to Onsite Waste Treatment and Disposal Practices". This policy is contained in the Water Quality Control Plan for the North Coast Region (1994). 4.2.5 Mendocino County Water Agency Originally known as the Mendocino County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the agency name was changed in 1987 to the Mendocino County Water Agency (MCWA). The MCWA is a special district govemed by the Board of Supervisors (Board) and is charged with assuring that adequate water will be available for the present and future uses by residents and lands in the County. The MCWA assists water suppliers in the County and represents the collective interests at the regional, state, and federal levels. The MCWA functions as a planning body, coordinator, and policy advisor to the Board. The Board has requested that the MCWA review and comment on all in-stream gravel mining use permit applications. Among the watershed management goals of the MCWA are: · To protect and enhance the quantity and quality of ground and surface waters within the district. January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants · To protect and enhance the physical and biological integrity of the County's rivers, streams and water ways. · To advise decision makers, at all levels of government, on district water resources issues in a manner that preserves future options and flexibility. · To enhance scientific knowledge and understanding of the water resources of Mendocino County. To date, the MCWA has been monitoring gravel mining activities in the Russian River for the last six years as part of the implementation of the recommendations in the Department of Water Resources' Upper Russian River Gravel and Erosion Study (1984). In addition, the MCWA commenced work on the Russian River Aggregate Resources Management Plan and continued work on the Russian River Enhancement and Public Access Plan. Some of the planning efforts are being conducted with Sonoma County agencies and are being funded by the State Water Resources Control Board and the State Coastal Conservancy. 4.2.6 City Of Ukiah The City of Ukiah Council is expected to adopt a new City General Plan within the next few months. The General Plan addresses the areas within the city limits as well as areas that are in Mendocino County but within the "sphere of influence" of the City. The staff of the City Community Development Department has indicated that most of the downtown area of Ukiah is developed and much of the new development will likely be in residential development projects to the northeast near Lake Mendocino Drive. In addition, new large- scale industrial development is extremely limited because of the lack of available space in the existing developments. Industrial development is focused in the southern part of the City, downstream of the Ranney collector. 4.2.7 Soil Conservation Service The SCS prepared the Potter Valley - Cold Creek Local Implementation Plan (LIP) in June 1991 to address issues relating to the high rates of sedimentation in Lake Mendocino. The LIP was prepared at the request of the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors through the Mendocino County Resource Conservation District. The LIP proposed two components to reduce the sediment loads. The first component was a land treatment program which included fencing, water development, planting improved forage species, fertilization of grassland and pastures, deferred grazing, and modifying range management practices to better meet landowner production and landscape goals. These measures will help reduce soil compaction, improve infiltration, increase stream baseflow and reduce erosion. The second component included structural measures to control stream channel and bank erosion in Potter Valley and sediment storage structures in Potter Valley and on Cold Creek. Recent conversations with SCS staff indicated that neither of the components has been implemented because of a lack of support and sponsors from the landowners. 4-7 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 4.2.8 Recreational Activities And Policies Most of the recreational activities within the watersheds occur at or near Lake Pillsbury. Lake Pillsbury recreational areas are managed by the Mendocino National Forest. The management policies related to watershed protection address sanitation, vehicle use, trash and fire hazards. A summary of some of the USDAFS policies is provided in Table 4-2. Recreational activities at Lake Mendocino are monitored by the U.S. Army COE. The recreation is limited to the lake and the facilities built around the lake. Sanitation and trash disposal are managed by the staff of Lake Mendocino. 4.2.9 Open Space Policies Open space policies within the watershed are regulated primarily by the USDAFS and the Mendocino County General Plan. See previous discussions for policies related to watershed protection. 4.2.10 Erosion Control/Soil Management Policies Erosion control within the watershed is managed and regulated by the USDAFS (through its OHV and facilities construction policies), the local SCS office and its local RCD counterpart, and the Mendocino County General Plan. See previous discussion for erosion control and soil management policies. 4.2.11 Fire Management Fire management within the watershed is under the auspices of the USDAFS and the CDF. As described above, the USDAFS has policies and guidelines for fire prevention, fire detection and fire fighting. Both the USDAFS and the CDF have a prescribed fire program to minimize the risk and extent of potential wildfires. 4.2.12 Spill Notification Discussions with the Emergency Command Center at CDF indicate that hazardous materials spills that are called into 911 are relayed to the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) Warning Center and the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department. The OES Warning Center then calls the RWQCB and the local administrator. As the notification systems is currently established, it is the responsibility of the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department and the RWQCB to notify the local water purveyors of any spills. The California Northern Railroad includes notification of the downstream water purveyors in its Spill Response Plan. 4,2.13 Califomia Rangeland Water Quality Management Plan In July 1995, the Rangeland Water Quality Management Plan (RWQMP) was developed by the State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality Nonpoint Source Program with the California Board of Forestry's Range Management Advisory Committee, the Cooperative Extension Service, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the California Association of Rescue Conservation Districts. The RWQMP represents a t:~,l~'~x~.oo~,/~x~ 4-8 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants voluntary, cooperative approach (Tier 1) to the implementation of BMPs to control non- point source pollutants that can be released from privately owned rangeland. If the voluntary, cooperative approach fails to manage the pollutants, the RWQCB can regulate rangeland in a regulatory-encouraged implementation of BMPs (Tier 2) and regulatory- based implementation of BMPs (Tier 3) through adoption of waste discharge permits and effluent requirements. Although the SWRCB is the lead agency responsible for implementation of the RWQMP, cooperation with many federal, state, and local agencies will be required through memoranda of understanding, management agency agreements, changes in permitting, and cross training of staff. The RWQMP intends to provide adequate education and technical assistance to the landowners and ranch managers. Each rancher will have the resources of the cooperating agencies to develop and implement individual plans for their properties. 4.3 COORDINATION MEASURES There are no formal coordination measures in place between the water purveyors and the management agencies responsible for the protection of the watersheds. However, the Upper Main Eel Watershed is primarily under the control of the USDAFS which has developed an extensive Land and Resource Management Plan that is consistent with the needs of the water purveyors. The Mendocino County General Plan sets goals and policies that control the activities that may impact water quality. Most projects will be reviewed against these goals and policies through the permit process. \ 4-9 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants -, 5 WATER QUALITY 5.1 DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS 5.1.1 Summary Of Surface Water Treatment Regulation In 1989, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the Surface Water Treatment Rule which required by 29 July 1993 the filtration and disinfection treatment of surface water sources, and groundwater under the direct influence of surface water. Pursuant to the federal regulations, all states were to have adopted similar regulations by 29 December 1990. California's SWTR, which implements the federal Surface Water Treatment Rule, became effective in June 1991. The state regulation satisfies three specific requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) amendments of 1986. Establishes cdtefia for determining when filtration is required for surface waters. · Defines minimum levels of disinfection for surface waters. Addresses five contaminants on the list of 83 published in the SDWA (Giardia lamblia, viruses, Legionella, turbidity, and heterotrophic plate count) by setting a treatment technique(s). 5.1,2 Contaminants Of Concem Within The Watershed Contaminants of concern in a domestic water supply are those that either pose a health threat or in some way alter the aesthetic acceptability of the water. These types of contaminants are currently regulated by EPA as primary and secondary maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), respectively. As directed by the SDWA amendments of 1986, EPA is expanding its list of primary MCLs at a rapid rate. In response to the federal changes and specific state concerns, the State of California is also continually evaluating and revising its drinking water regulations. The City, MCWD, and RVCWD all prepare annual water quality monitoring reports for their customers. The annual reports provide a summary of the parameters which are monitored for the surface water and groundwater supplies. Where available, monitoring results are compared with applicable MCLs. The 1994 annual water quality report for Ukiah is provided in Appendix A, for MCWD, in Appendix B, and for RVCWD in Appendix C. Microbiological constituents and turbidity are the primary contaminants of concern. Based on the contaminant sources identified within the watersheds (see Section 3.0). The potential sources of contaminants include: 1, Wastewater treatment facilities 2. Septic systems 3. Grazing animals with access to water courses 5-1 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants -, 4. Wild animals 5. Non-body contact and body contact recreation at Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino 6. Spills from traffic or rail accidents 7. Releases from industrial activities The pdmary sources of microbiological contaminants are grazing and wild animals, wastewater treatments and septic spills, and to a lesser degree, body-contact recreation in the surface water source(s). The primary sources of turbidity are sediment runoff from storm events, and natural erosion. Erosion will increase from OHV recreational use and following any forest fires within the watersheds. The potential sources of deleterious materials are spills that occur on the highway or railroad, and from industrial activities. 5.2 EXISTING WATER QUALITY 5.2.1 Monitoring Programs As discussed in Section 2.0, the Upper Main Eel River and the Russian River provide the surface water supply for the City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD. Both the City and the MCWD also have groundwater supplies. The MCWD collects weekly bacteriological samples of its combined raw water supply at the entry to the treatment plant. The RVCWD collects monthly bacteriological sampling of its raw water. Table 5-1 summarizes the water quality monitoring that is performed by each water purveyor. As described earlier in Section 3.2.3 Urban Runoff, the RWQCB requires monitoring of the industrial discharges in Ukiah. In addition, the RWQCB conducts annual water quality monitoring as part of the Russian River Monitoring Committee. In addition, each water purveyor conducts weekly monitoring in its distribution system. The City collects five distribution samples each week for both bacteriological quality and for chlorine residual. In addition, the City collects one sample each quarter from the 2.5 million gallon storage tank for analysis of total trihalomethanes. The MCWD collects two distribution samples each week for both bacteriological quality and chlorine residual. In some instances, such as when complaints occur, the MCWD will collect more frequent chlorine residual samples. The RVCWD collects one distribution system sample each week for bacteriological quality, chlorine residual, and zinc orthophosphate residual. The zinc orthophosphate is added for corrosion control. Each water purveyor also conducts annual monitoring for State of California Title 22 primary and secondary drinking water standards as described in their annual reports. In March 1995, the DHS developed monitoring freo, uency guidelines specifically for the RVCWD for the following types of contaminants: · Inorganic chemicals · General mineral 5-2 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 3. Obtain water from RVCWD and Calpella County Water Distdct through an intertie or pumper truck. 4. Use three groundwater wells (Wells 1, 2, and 6) that are currently off-line following DHS approval. 2.2.3 Redwood Valley County Water District In August of 1977 a full permit was issued to the RVCWD to construct a domestic water system to serve customers in Redwood Valley and vicinity. The Redwood Valley County Water System was constructed in 1978 and was placed in operation in November 1979. The system consists of an intake structure at Lake Mendocino, three pumps with a combined capacity of 13,000 gallons per minute (gpm), a water transmission line, a 70,000-gallon surge tank, a water storage pond with a total nominal capacity of 68 acre- feet, an irrigation distribution system designed to serve 3,300 acres, and a domestic water system (DWS). The DWS consists of a water treatment plant with a capacity of 2.58 mgd and about 60 miles of distribution mains. Water quality in the DWS is protected from the agricultural system, which uses untreated water, by the use of a totally separate distribution system. In 1986, the treatment facility capacity was increased to 2.58 mgd by the addition of a second clarifier, a third pressure filter, and a third pressurization pump. The customer capacity increased from 1,200 service connections to 1,800 service connections. This water treatment plant expansion was the maximum allowable expansion in RVCWD's original design. Service Area Land use in the RVCWD service area is governed by the Planning Department of Mendocino County and the General Plan for Mendocino County. The service area boundary is shown on Figure 2-2. The service area, comprised of 4,700 acres, is located in the unincorporated area of Redwood Valley about 9 miles north of the City of Ukiah and on both sides of Highway 101. The area is rural in nature and dominated by vineyards and animal grazing. The RVCWD has a dual water system serving 3,330 acres for agriculture use and a separate domestic water system. At the end of 1994, the RVCWD served approximately 2,700 permanent residents through 1,035 service connections, all of which are metered. All of Redwood Valley is served by septic tanks and has no sewage collection system. The RVCWD has capacity for an additional 600 connections after it obtains water rights year-round from Lake Mendocino. Water Production Water production data, connections, and population data for the last seven years are summarized in Table 2-3. In 1994, the RVCWD's water system produced 235 million gallons or approximately 0.6 mgd. In July, the month of maximum production, the system produced a total of 32 million gallons or approximately 1.02 mgd. 2-11 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants · General physical · Radiological · Volatile organic chemicals · Synthetic organic chemicals A table summarizing the monitoring frequency guidelines is provided in Appendix C. 5.2.2 Evaluation Of Monitoring Data As shown in the annual reports presented in Appendices A, B, and C, the quality of the City's (Appendix A), MCWD's (Appendix B) and RVCWD's (Appendix B) surface water supply is excellent. As discussed above, the primary contaminants of concern in the watersheds are microbiological organisms. In 1990-1991, the City analyzed samples from two stations, the Ranney collector and the Russian River and analyzed them for bacteriological data (results are summarized in Table 5-2). The most current organic and inorganic chemical data can be found in the 1994 Annual Water Quality Report for the City (Appendix A). The City's sample for organic and inorganic chemical data was collected at the Ranney collector on 10 July 1994. Bacteriological data collected by the MCWD for its raw water composite sampling are analyzed for the presence of total and fecal coliform bacteria and the results are presented as "present" or "absent". Analytical data for 1995 is summarized in Table 5-3. MCWD's data indicate that its raw water composite often shows the presence of coliform bacteria, but that the coliform are not always present. Monitoring from 1986 to 1992 that quantified bacteriological counts indicated counts were generally Iow and rarely exceeded 16 Most Probable Number (MPN). It should be noted that MCWD's raw water composite, includes both water from the shallow wells has been filtered as well as direct intake from the Russian River. Analytical results for samples collected at the Russian River intake, including organic and inorganic chemicals from 1994 and 1995 are in Appendix B. Results of RVCWD's monthly raw water bacteriological sampling for the last several years from Lake Mendocino indicates similar results to the quantified monitoring of the MCWD. RVCWD's sampling has always had positive total coliform results in the raw water samples (Table 5-4). Organic and inorganic chemical data sheets for samples collected at the pump station caisson, are in Appendix C. The results of the City's, MCWD's, and RVCWD's weekly distribution system bacteriological sampling showed that the water delivered by the water purveyors consistently meets State drinking water standards. Raw water turbidity data for the City, RVCWD, and MCWD are summarized in Table 5-5. The City's Ranney collector turbidity values (average of daily values for each month) range from 0.29 to 5.6 NTU for 1990-1995. MCWD's raw water influent turbidity values range from 0.62 to 6.61 NTU for 1993-1995. RVCWD's raw water turbidity values range from 0,10 to 22.59 NTU for 1991-1995. As would be expected, RVCWD's turbidifies are generally higher that MCWD's or the City's because RVCWD has a direct surface water intake from Lake Mendocino while most of MCWD's surface water and all of the City's surface water is drawn through the river gravels which provides a filtering effect. 5-3 January 1~ Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 5.3 EVALUATION OF ABILITY TO MEET SWTR REQUIREMENTS DHS' April 1995 evaluation of the City's water treatment plant and water supply system provided the City with filtration and disinfection requirements. DHS required that the City provide a minimum reduction of 3 log (99.9 percent) Giardia and 4 log (99.99 percent) virus through the filtration and disinfection treatment processes. The DHS determined that the City's Microfloc Contact Clarification Filtration process has a reliable removal of 2.5 log (99.7 percent) removal of Giardia and 2.0 log (99.0 percent) removal of viruses when operated at finished water turbidity levels of 0.2 NTU or less. The City's chlorine disinfection process can provide the remaining 0.5 log reduction of Giardia and 2 log reduction of viruses. The MCWD also is required to provide a minimum reduction of 3 log (99.9 percent) Giardia and 4 log (99.99 percent) virus through the filtration and disinfection treatment processes. The January 1993 Engineering Report prepared by DHS for MCWD indicated that the disinfection system did not meet the inactivation requirements of the SWTR. However, since that time, the MCWD has installed Clearwell #2 which has a 155,000 gallon working capacity and provides additional detention time for chlorine disinfection. The MCWD is in discussion with the DHS regarding the inactivation that can be credited by the use of Clearwell #2 and may conduct a dye test later this year to provide information regarding the detention time in the clearwell. The RVCWD also must provide a minimum reduction of 3 log (99.9 percent) Giardia and 4 log (99.99 percent) virus through the filtration (2.5 log removal of giardia) and disinfection (0.51 log removal of giardia) treatment processes. In addition, the April 1995 DHS Inspection Report indicated that the RVCWD treatment system is able to meet the requirements of the SWTR by maintaining a chlorine residual of 0.3 mg/L from the clarifiers before post-chlorination and by maintaining a 0.6 mg/L chlorine residual out of the transmission line and contact tank. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants . · 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 CONCLUSIONS Based on the investigation and evaluation of potential contaminant sources within the Upper Main Eel River and Upper Russian River Watersheds, these watersheds produce a high quality water supply and have no contaminants which are considered significant. The Upper Main Eel River Watershed is under the management of the USD^FS which has many programs and policies that govern activities throughout the watershed. The USD^FS' Land and Resource Management Plan for the Mendocino National Forest seems to address the watershed management and control issues of concern to the water purveyors. The Upper Russian River Watershed does not have a single management agency for the watershed; however, policies under the Mendocino County General Plan and the RWOCB's Water Quality Control Plan provide general guidance to protect the watershed. The potential contaminant sources which, on a relative basis, may require monitoring with respect to their potential impact on water quality are: 1. Wastewater treatment facilities 2. Septic systems 3. Grazing animals with access to water courses 4. Wild animals ... o Non-body contact and body contact recreation at Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino 6. Spills from traffic or rail accidents 7. Releases from industrial activities The primary sources of microbiological contaminants are 'grazing and wild animals, wastewater treatment and septic systems, and to a lesser degree, body-contact recreation in the water sources. The primary sources of turbidity are sediment runoff from storm events and natural erosion. Erosion will increase from OHV recreation use and following any forest fires. The potential sources of deleterious materials are spills that occur on the highway or railroad within the watersheds and from industrial activities. As discussed in Section 4.0, the USDAFS, Mendocino County and other agencies, have numerous policies and control measures in place to protect the water quality and other natural resources within the watersheds. These agencies monitor and protect the watershed as well as possible given the limited resources available to the agencies. As discussed in Section 5.0, the water purveyors have water quality monitoring programs in place to monitor the quality of both the raw and treated water. The water treatment plants l:~iob~"~gS4X)3S.00~t~u~ dec 6-1 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants for the City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD have performed in accordance with their design parameters and DH$ requirements. DHS' recommended minimum removal rates for Giardia (3 log) and viruses (4 log) appear appropriate for the surface water supplies for the three water purveyors based on the data available. 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS As described in this report, the USDAFS, Mendocino County, the RWQCB, and several other agencies have many policies and controls in place to protect the natural resources of the watersheds. Based on the findings and conclusions of this watershed sanitary survey, the following additional controls are recommended: . The greatest potential threat to ddnking water quality is that of a spill of deleterious material (e.g., petroleum products, hazardous or toxic substances) that could enter Lake Mendocino or the Russian River. The threat is potentially great because the water treatment systems used by the City, the RVCWD, and the MCWD were not designed to remove these types of substances. It also appears that the water purveyors may not be notified in a timely manner of spills that may pose a threat to Lake Mend(~cino or the Russian River. It is recommended that the City, the RVCWD, and the MCWD develop a notification plan so that the water purveyors are notified immediately of any hazardous matedal spill that could impact Lake Mendocino or the Russian River. The plan should include coordination with and distribution to the 911 dispatcher at the Howard Forest Emergency Command Center, State Office of Emergency Services, California Highway Patrol, Mendocino County Environmental Health Department Hazardous Materials Team, Califomia Department of Transportation, Califomia Northern Railroad, and other entities to ensure notification of a spill. . The recreational use of Lake Mendocino poses some threats to water quality which affects all three water purveyors. However, public recreation is a significant, well- established purpose of Lake Mendocino. The City, RVCWD, and MCWD should work with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to initiate a public information campaign to educate the recreation area's visitors of the multipurpose roles of the lake. Signboards and fliers could be part of an information campaign that would help to discourage activities which could impact the quality of the lake water. . As discussed, many septic tank systems exist within the Russian River Watershed. According to the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department, there have been no major system failures, although some areas have higher than average replacements. The City, RVCWD, and MCWD should request that the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department notify the water purveyors of any future system failures which may impact water quality within the watershed. Septic tank use in the Upper Main Eel River Watershed is minimal and should not require this notification. . The grazing of cattle within the watershed is allowed on much of the private lands. Horses are also grazed on private lands. Cattle grazing on private lands (e.g., ranches) occurs primarily in Potter Valley. Cattle can have access to water courses and are a source of Giardia, Cryptosporidium, viruses and bacteria to the rivers and '\ 6-2 January 1996 , . ¸7. . Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Lake Mendocino. The City, RVCWD, and MCWD should coordinate with the SWRCB, the Mendocino County Agricultural Commissioner, the Natural Resources Conservation Service and other agencies in the implementation of the SWRCB's Rangeland Water Quality Management Plan to work with the cattle ranchers to encourage cattle grazing away from water ways. Treatment of this potential contaminant source is discussed in Section 5.0. The use of the watershed by wild animals is a natural occurrence which adds to the value and beauty of the watershed. However, wild animals within the watershed are also a potential source of Giardia, Cryptosporidium, viruses and bacteria directly into the creeks and lake. Control of wild animals within the watershed is virtually impossible; therefore, no recommendations for wild animal control are proposed. Treatment of this potential contaminant source is discussed in Section 5.0. At present, there are no cooperative multi-agency agreements to protect the watersheds' resources, although the sharing of resources by the City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD to prepare this sanitary survey is a first step. The City, the RVCWD, and the MCWD should consider formalizing cooperative agreements with agencies such as USDAF$, Mendocino County Water Agency, and the Soil Conservation Service to coordinate, watershed activities that enhance water quality in the future for the mutual benefit of the agencies. Coordination activities could include periodic meetings and written procedures with goals and policies, implementation plans, and contact names and telephone numbers. The water purveyors' existing monitoring programs are consistent with DHS' requirements and provide an effective means for monitoring the contaminants of concern within the watersheds. The sampling frequency and locations, and parameters monitored appear appropriate for the contaminant sources identified in the watersheds. No additional monitoring is recommended. The City, the MCWD, and the RVCWD may wish to consider the development of a joint water quality database for maintaining and analyzing watershed water quality data. The database, which could be spreadsheet-based, should include the weekly and monthly bacteriological data for each entity. Such a database would enable the water purveyors to track water quality changes and trends at the sampling points within the watersheds. The database could also be expanded to include other water quality data. 6-3 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants . 7 REFERENCES American Water Works Association, California-Nevada Section, Source Water Quality Committee. December 1993. Watershed Sanitary Survey Guidance Manual. Ontario, Califomia. California Department of Health Services Office of Drinking Water. August 1977. Engineering Report. Santa Rosa, Califomia. California Department of Health Services Office of Drinking Water. 12 April 1995. Annual Inspection Report for Redwood Valley County Water District. California Department of Health Services Office of Drinking Water. January 1993. Engineering Report for Consideration of a Permit Application for Millview County Water Dist#ct. Santa Rosa, California. California Department of Health Services Office of Drinking Water. March 1993. Engineerfng Report for Consideration of a Permit Application for City of Ukiah. Santa Rosa, California Califomia Department of Health Services Office of Drinking Water. 31 March 1993. Water Quality Emergency Notification Plan. Santa Rosa, Califomia. California Department of Health Services Office of Drinking Water. April 1995. Engineering Report for Consideration of a Permit Application for City of Ukiah. Santa Rosa, Califomia. Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board - North Coast Region. August 18, 1994. Water Quality Control Plan - North Coast Region, Region 1. Santa Rosa, California. California Regional Water Quality Control Board - North Coast Region. December 13, 1986. Storage, Transport, and Spills of Hazardous Mate#als in the Russian River Basin. Santa Rosa, California. City of Ukiah. 1994. Water production data. Ukiah, California. City of Ukiah. 27 March 1995. 1994 Annual Report to the Califomia Department of Health Servfces Office of Ddnking Water Dtfnking Water Field Operations Branch for year ending 31 December 1994. Ukiah, California. County of Mendocino. 26 April 1993. Mendocino County General Plan. Ukiah, California. Kennedy Engineers, Inc. November 1976. Report Ranney Well Water Quality and Treatment Investigation for City of Ukiah. San Francisco, California. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants. June 1994. Final Report Wastewater Collection and Treatment Servfces Feasibility Study for City of Ukiah. San Francisco, California. Millview County Water District. May 1995. Operations Plan. Ukiah, California. 7-1 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Millview County Water District. 1994. Annual Surface Water Quality Report. Ukiah, California. ., Personal Communication. California Department of Fish and Game. Mr. Jack Booth. 19 July 1995. Personal Communication. California Department of Forestry. Mr. Jim Wright. 30 August 1995. Personal Communication. California Department of Health Services Office of Drinking Water. Mr. Bruce Burton, Ms. Debra Lambeth, and Mr. Guy Schott. 11 July 1995. Personal Communication. California Department of Transportation. Mr. Larry Look. 23 August 1995. Personal CommUnication. California Department of Transportation. Ms. Cheryl Willis. 19 July 1995. Personal Communication. California Office of Emergency Services. Mr. Lloyd Darrington. 14 September 1995. Personal Communication. Calpella County Water District. Mr. Dave Redding. 28 August 1995. Personal Communication. City of Ukiah Community Development Department. Mr. Dave Lohce. 6 September 1995. Personal Communication. City of Ukiah. Mr. Darryl Bames, Mr. George Borecky. Mr. Terry Eib. 5, 7, and 11 September 1995. Personal Communication. Georgia Pacific Resins. Mr. Steve Herron. 30 August 1995. Personal Communication. Louisiana Pacific Corporation. Mr. Bob Vogt. 30 August 1995 and 11 September 1995. Personal Communication. Masonite Corporation. Mr. Robert Scaglione. 30 August 1995. Personal Communication. Mendocino County Agricultural Commissioner. Mr. Bengston and Mr. Steve Hajik. 19 July 1995 and 30 August 1995. Personal Communication. Mendocino County Environmental Health Department. 7 July 1995. Personal Communication. Mendocino County Farm Bureau. Ms. Carrie Brown. 29 August 1995. . Personal Communication. Mendocino County Public Works. Mr. Bob Parker. 19 July 1995. 7-2 J=nu=ry ~ 99s Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Personal Communication. Mendocino County Vintners Association. Mr. Tom Kinden. 31 August 1995. Personal Communication. Mendocino County Water Agency. Mr. Dennis Slota. 28 August 1995. Personal Communication. Millview County Water District. Mr. Harley Lukenbill. 7 September 1995. August 1995. Personal Communication. Potter Valley Irrigation District. Ms. Janet Pauli. 19 July 1995. Personal Communication. Redwood Valley County Water District. Mr. Keith Tiemann. 8 and 12 September 1995. Personal Communication. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Lake Mendocino. 23 and 31 August 1995 and 7 September 1995. Personal Communication. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Mendocino National Forest. Ms. Melissa Morosy, Ms. Nancy Gard, and Mr. Vic Andresen. 31 August 1995. Personal Communication. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Ms. Louise Hjelming. 7 June 1995 and 30 August 1995. Personal Communication. California Regional Water Quality Control Board - North Coast Region. Mr. Bob Tancreto, Mr. Bob Clamp, Mr. Nathan Corrals, Ms. Sue Warner. 10 July 1995. Personal Communication. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Mendocino National Forest. Ms. Laurie Pacheco. 7 September 1995. Potter Valley Irrigation District. April 1995. Report to the Eel Russian River Commission. Potter Valley, California. Redwood Valley County Water District. 8 March 1995. 1994 Annual Report to the Drfnking Water Field Operations Branch for Year Ending 31 December 1994. Redwood Valley, California. Redwood Valley County Water District. No date. Emergency Notification Plan. Redwood Valley, California. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Mendocino National Forest. February 1995a. Land and Resource Management Plan. Willows, Califomia. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Mendocino National Forest. May 1995b. Watershed Analysis Report for the Upper Main Eel River Watershed. Willows, California. 7-3 January 1996 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Mendocino County, California. June 1991. Potter Valley- Cold Creek Local Implementation Plan. Davis, California. 7-4 January 1996 · . ...: :..-_. ;,,. -~.~ '..-."~ ~...~-- . . -.. . . _ . · ~.~ ~ --:- .........?~' ..... : .?.. ~ - ..-- ..... .-...,... ,?-.?:~" .~' . ...... . :. ' ~ }. ." .,..'. . . ~.. '.' · , ~ :~: . -, .~.-.. ..... . . ... ~ , ._. :: ' 5x ~ . - - ... · -' "' -: '"-.."'::)'"' ;':.:.""-': ' "'TABLES ' i . , . . . .,.. ; · ., . .. . . ., . -: ., _ - . ;. - . ~- ~ .. , . .... . -.. . , ... ~:'..','~.. ~. .'.: ,- ,..:..-..:.-.... }"~ . .,.-' . .~. , .'. . · '~'." ~-' : ~ ' - ~:~ ~,.,- - -'~ 7'.,'..;: ,.~ .,~.:. · . · . ' ': . - . ; ....'" -. -; ,... ~ .--'..., ' :.--;~ ', . . . . . - ~ .,.'..'[ .~.. , .." , :., ;.-. -.. . ~ · ..... ~..~. ·, . ,-~'.:, ..". . .... . ,-.- , . ~ .~ .. . . . . . ?: ..~ ., - - , ~. .. ~ .... ' . -. ~ 7- '. . ;..~-~ . .. -,-, .~. ~". ~.~. ~ ~. ', ' . ~ . ,~ · ' . · -. -. - . ; ~'/.,' · -, . .'- '.. -~r.".. .. . . , . . · . .' . · . , , · r. .. ' '- ~r ~- ~ - · ' - ,- - - --- -'- ' ' '" . ~ · ..,-. . . .. , ...,.,.. ..... ~. . . ...- ...':.. :, . -.:~ ._"/ ,.- . ;,...~ · ....;~:"'-. ,~"~ -. :' ~.,'~'.. . .~ --" :'~"u:?..'.;~ '.~: ~'" _" ' . . ...._- ~,~ .., ~ -. . - .~- ~. -.~..~ ' ' ' '-'.-' '~ ' - ..... "',' ' '" ' ' ;,~','t,.. :' . ',' - .. . ~ . , : ,; '.. .......-.. .~- ,-.:~ -... -, .... ;", ..... ~:.- ..... ~ . · . _.., ...~.._' . ... . .,. . ,,::..'~.';; ...., ........ ,:..., ,..., ,.?.,, ..... ~ .... , .. ........ _ ..... ...',?.. ~. , ..- ... .~ ' .-.. .?.::;..... ,' ,,.:. - ;,. ,:. ,.. -- . .,. · .~ . . ..... ? , .... ..~ .;..:.-.,...~ .::-..; .,....., .~...',".;'~.':-- ~.':.~ · . .; ; '- .:.. - .~ . .~. ,,. .-','.,..'' ~.,'- ~' ~' ,~ .,,' '~ ;~ - ,- '/.. ,; '..7" . ','.' '.. .... . '..5" ' -' · '; · -"-- '. ' " '' . · · '" '. ---'.-~'.' ' -~,. - -''-, .';'-'' '" '. '~.- ' ~' ' ,~[';' - .I,"' , ', . -' "~" ' .,..' '' -'~ ~'- ' '-, - · .- .~ . ,. ., . ~:. ;...:- ..- ;,. ...., , .-.. .. . f.,. , . . . ,,.-,..~ ......,_ . . _,. . . - ., , . · . · . Kennedy/Jenks Consultants _ · TABLE 2-1 CITY OF UKIAH 1994 WATER PRODUCTION DATA Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 . Page I of I Month NumberOf:: '~.:.'. Monthly Water i Monthly Water Use Connections .' ::';::::!!:::!:.:ProdUction'. · .: · January 6,296 55.56 37.17 February 6,296 46.64 44.97 March 6,296 59.37 44.97 April 6,296 109.63 82.00 May 6,296 111.16 59.05 June 6,296 158.95 108.19 July 6,296 188.22 153.02 August 6,296 177.14 162.60 September 6,296 147.58 145.15 October 6,296 105.23 116.65 November 6,296 66.96 75.46 December 6,296 64.13 52.46 ..... ,,, .. Total 6,296 1,290.57 1,081.58 Notes: (a) MG = million gallons i:~job~95'~35. O0~rpttsun~ey~tabll2.1 .doc C C CS) j:: LLI ~ c Kennedy/~lenks Consultants TABLE 2-3 RVCWD WATER PRODUCTION DATA Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page I of 1 Year Max. Max. Ave. No. of Day Month (gdc) Conn. (MG)(b) (MG) , Max. Annual 'Meter "i.: i% loss Month Prod. '. i, Deliv. in (gdc)lb) (MG) ~' (MG) 'System 1988 1.099 27.54 892 199.95 193.9 9.9 550 996 4,500 1989 0.965 24.9i 802 196.34 Unk.(b) Unk.(b) 537 1,002 4,500 1990 1.125 26.98 869 208.14 172.7 Unk.(b) 569 1,002 4,500 1991 1.114 27.46 882 210.72 196.0 1.9 575 1,004 4,500 1992 1.189 30.60 982 214.91 198.3 4.9 586 1,005 2,700 1993 1.302 32.73 1,028 241.54 197.9 11.5 644 1,027 2,700 1994 1.181 31.76 990 234.81 203.3 8.2 622 1,035 2,700 Pop.(.) Notes: (a) The population reported for the period of 1988 to 1991 are the total populations of Redwood Valley based on the number of connections, and not the actual population of people being served. (b) MG = Million Gallons; Unk. = Unknown; gdc = gallon/day/connection i:~job',95~95(X)35. OOVpt~ un~ey~ta ble2.3, doc Kennedy~enks Consultants · · TABLE 2-4 RVCWD DOMESTIC WATER STORAGE Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 1 Tank Zone '*:'~ i':CapacitY::'i~ii:: Base'Elevation Date Of ~.' ~.:: ~::~' ..(gallOn) ~.(feet) ~ ~ ~. Construction East Tank 1 500,000 1,002 1978 (steel) West Tank 1 250,000 980 1982 (steel) North Tank 1 100,000 975 1982 (steel) Total 850,000 i:~job~5~-.~O035 .~un~ey~tlbte2-4. doc Kennedy/Jenks Consultants · TABLE 3-1 CROP ACREAGES Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 1 Total i i Crop Type Ukiah Valley' ::;:.~ Redwood'.:i!i.~:~:: Potter Valley ~ ' 'Valley ~ '~ " ~ Vineyard 4,665 ' 2,000 1,100 7,965 Pears 1,130 93 400 1,623 Irrigated Pasture 10 200 3,500 3,710 Other vegetables, 118 35 1,100+ 1,253 herbs, fruit, trees ,, , ,,, 5,923 Total 2,328 6,100 14,551 I:~job~95~95(X)35. OOVl:~survey~table3-1 .doc Kennedy/Jenks Consultants -, TABLE 3-2 SIGNIFICANCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 2 Potential Contaminant .. Potentialto .'~i:==i~ :: ~i!~*.~!~.i~ ~. Comments · Impact Water Source : Qualit ") ==== =========== ======= Wastewater: Treatment Facilities Low Potential risk of spills/overflows to surface water and seepage from ponds to groundwater in connection to surface water Septic Systems Medium System density Iow in rural areas; systems close to Ukiah may be sewered. Reclaimed Water None Not in watershed. Urban Runoff Medium Some industrial discharges may occur, first flush of road runoff. Agricultural Crop Land Use Low Large acreages include agricultural activities. Grazing Animals Low Direct access to lakes, canals, and waterways is a concern; number of grazing animals is limited. Concentrated Animal Facilities None Not in watershed. Pesticide/Herbicide Use Medium Use within watershed occurs in agricultural areas and on private yards. Wild Animals ~ Low Potential source of microbial pathogenic organisms; no beavers in watershed. Mine Runoff None No active mines exist except for sand and gravel. Solid and Hazardous Waste None No landfills upstream of intakes, disposal of Disposal Facilities toxic and hazardous materials is not permitted. Logging Low Limited logging in watershed. Recreational Use: Campgrounds/Picnic Areas Dispersed Use Non-body Contact Recreation Body Contact Recreation OHV Recreation Low Low Low/Medium Medium/High Low/Medium All have sanitation systems. No sanitation facilities in remote areas; sanitation and waste disposal guidelines are provided to dispersed users. Occurs in Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino. Occurs in Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino. Increased erosion potential; limited to only specified areas where impact is minimal. I:~job~95~950035. ~ urveyU, a ble3-2, doc Kennedy/Jenks Consultants · TABLE 3-2 SIGNIFICANCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 2 of 2 Potential Contaminant Source Unauthorized Activity Potential to ' .: Comments ImpaCt Water ::' Qualitym Low Depends on type of illegal activity and distance from waterways and lakes; no known past incidents. Underground Fuel Storage Low Tanks are being operated in compliance Tanks with County regulations. Traffic Accidents/Spills Medium Several major transportation corridors; Iow record of past accidents/spills; emergency response procedures in place. Groundwater which Influences Low Springs produce limited amount of water. Surface Water Seawater Intrusion None Not in watershed. Geologic Hazards Low Erosion potential increases during and after large storm events. Fires Medium Sediments settle quickly after events. Notes' (a) Relative to other potential contaminants in the watershed. i:~job~95~950035. OOVpt~un~ey~table3-2, doc Kennedy/~Jenks Consultants TABLE 3-3 PROJECTED CHANGES IN CONTAMINANTS Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 1 i Contaminant Wastewater · '~ .: '~,~'~:~J~' Projected Change ' Additional and/or larger capacity wastewater treatment plants in Calpella and Ukiah · Additional septic systems in remote areas Agricultural Activities · Additional conversions to agricultural lands can increase potential for pesticide and herbicide use Recreational Use · Increased use of existing campgrounds/picnic areas; may require additional or larger septic/vault systems Additional campgrounds/picnic areas with additional septic/vault systems Increased use of remote forest areas (dispersed use) Traffic Accidents/Spills · Additional traffic on the area's highways resulting in increased risk of accidents and spills Fires · Increased use of the watershed and increased traffic could increase the risk of wildfires. i:~job~95~950035.00Vpt~,u~eyUable3-3.doc Kennedy/~Jenks Consultants TABLE 4-1 USDA FS POLICIES RELATED TO WATERSHED PROTECTION Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 2 Policy Type Water Quality .... ~ ':; :;~:.: ..~. :Policy Descdption Ensure that USDA FS activities me-~'~state and federal water quality laws and objectives Implement best management practices (BMPs) to meet water quality objectives and maintain and improve the quality of surface water in the forest · Survey all burned areas to determine rehabilitation needs · Manage National Forest lands to meet Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives Facilities · Operate and maintain forest system roads and trails according to Fire Management maintenance levels and objectives appropriate to the planned use, and considering costs and effects on land and resources Meet Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives for each existing or planned road Control by closing public and administrative use on the forest transportation system, particularly in areas where timber harvests have been completed · Develop and maintain cooperative agreements for fire protection and prevention Apply a fire protection philosophy which combines resource values, hazards and risks to focus efforts on prevention of unacceptable resource damage and loss, and minimizing impacts to aquatic habitats Provide a prescribed fire program that responds to multiple resources, fire management and wilderness objectives and contributes to the attainment of Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives i:~job~95~950035,00Vpt~u~vey~table4.1 .doc Kennedy/Jenks Consultants TABLE 4-1 USDA FS POLICIES RELATED TO WATERSHED PROTECTION Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 2 of 2 Policy Type : . Off-Highway Vehicles Administer routes and staging areas open for OHV use to promote the use of vehicles, protect resources and minimize conflicts All off-highway vehicles must use designated routes, after it has been determined, through the environmental process, that the use is appropriate · Close roads and trails immediately when use is causing or is likely to cause unacceptable effects · Design and construct trails and staging areas to minimize adverse impacts on other resources Recreation Manage recreation use in wilderness to discourage heavy concentrations of users, and to minimize impacts on natural systems Adjust dispersed and developed recreation practices that retard or prevent attainment of Aquatic Conservation Strategy Objectives i:~job~35. OOVl:~sun~ey~ta hie4-1 .doc Kennedy/Jenks Consultants TABLE 4-2 USDA FS RECREATIONAL POLICIES PROJECT NAME Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 1 Policy Type Fire Safety Campfires in undeveloped camping areas are restricted dudng certain times of the year, require a permit, and require that the user carry a shovel. All OHVs must have spark arrestors. Sanitation · All human waste is to be buded. Select a spot at least 200 feet from Trash · streams, springs, meadows or campsites and dig a hole at least 8 inches deep. Cover the hole and compact the soil after use. All trash should be carried out of the area. Horses/Pets · Horses must be hobbled or picketed at least 100 feet from streams, EroSion springs, meadows, trails or campsites. · Before leaving camp, scatter manure so it will decompose quickly. · Where dogs are allowed, they must be on a leash. · Do not cut across trail switchbacks as this may cause destructive trail erosion. i:~job~35~95003S. O0~p~u~vey~ta hie4.2, doc Kennedy/Jenks Consultants . · TABLE 5-1 WATER TREATMENT PLANT MONITORING SCHF_.DULI= Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 1 Water Quality Parameter Monitoring Frequency · Ukiah ~ ~ MCWD RVCWD Raw Water (Combined) Bacteriological NM Weekly Monthly Turbidity Continuous Continuous Daily Temperature NM Daily Daily pH Continuous Daily Daily Color and Odor Daily Weekly NM Filtered Water Bacteriological NM Monthly Monthly (summer) Turbidity Continuous Continuous Continuous pH Continuous Daily Continuous Color and Odor Daily . Weekly Monthly (summer) Chlorine residual Continuous Continuous Continuous Temperature Daily Daily Continuous Notes' (a) NM = not monitored (b) Continuous can indicate that while there is continuous readout of the parameter, the data are not necessarily recorded continuously. The data are generally recorded manually by operations staff. ~job~95~950035.00Vpt~un~ey~tableS- 1 .do~ Kennedy/Jenks Consultants -. TABLE 5-2 CITY OF UKIAH RAW WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING COMPARISON OF THE RANNEY COLLECTOR AND THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATERS Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 2 Date Jul-90 Colony'Count Per 100 Mi Sampled {~ Ranney Collector 17.0 Membrane Filter 9 Tube Dilution Method. Sampled ~ Russian River 1 > 1600 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN 5 >2400 MPN Aug-90 <1.0 Membrane Filter 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 10.0 Membrane Filter 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN Sep-90 5.0 Membrane Filter 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN Oct-90 < 1.0 Membrane Filter .:. 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN >2400 MPN Nov-90 < 1.0 Membrane Filter 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN , ~ 3 >2400 MPN Jun-91 15.0 Membrane Filter 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN Jul-91 <1.0 Membrane Filter 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN Aug-91 10.0 Membrane Filter 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN i:~ob~5"~.~u~vey~tableS-2, doc Kennedy,LI enks Consultants TABLE 5-2 CITY OF UKIAH RAW WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING COMPARISON OF THE RANNEY COLLECTOR AND THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATERS Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 2 of 2 Date Colony Count Per 100 MI ' ... · ::Week' ...~ '~ Sampled ~ Ranney Collector Sep-91 2.0 Membrane Filter 9 Tube Dilution Method. Sampled {~ Russian River 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN Oct-91 7.0 Membrane Filter 1 >2400 MPN 2 >2400 MPN 3 >2400 MPN 4 >2400 MPN 5 >2400 MPN Jun-92 68 i:~job~95~950035. ~u~vey~ta hie 5-2. doc Kennedy/Jenks Consultants TABLE 5-3 RAW WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA FOR THE MILLVIEW COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian And Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 1 Sample Date Location Total Coliform ColilFecal Coliform 1/19/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. absent absent 2/16/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. absent absent 3/14/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. present absent 4/27/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. absent absent 5/9/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. absent absent 6/27/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. present present 7/5/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. present present 8/1/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. present present 9/12/95 2850 Redeymer Rd. absent absent 10/26/95 2850 Rede;ymer Rd. present absent i:~jObi35~raO055. O(Npt~suwey~ta bleS-3, doc Kennedl~r~lenks Consultants TABLE 5-4 RAW WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA REDWOOD VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 1 of 2 Sample Date Location ':: ' '.:.. Total Coliform .. .E. ColilFecal ·: . '::.' .... ' ' '.. '' " " Coliform 1/16/91 T.P. Influent 61/100 mi 2/6/91 T.P. Influent 9/100 mi 3/6/91 T.P. Influent 21/100 mi 8/6/91 T.P. Influent TNTC 9/3/91 T.P. Influent 2/100 mi 10/1/91 T.P. Influent TNTC 11/5/91 T.P. Influent TNTC 12/3/91 T.P. Influent <1/100 mi 2/4/92 T.P. Influent 12/100 mi 3/3/92 T.P. Influent 10/100 mi 4/8/92 T.P. Influent TNTC(~) 5/5/92 T.P. Influent TNTC 6/2/92 T.P. Influent TNTC 7/7/92 T.P. Influent TNTC 8/11/92 T.P. Influent TNTC 9/8/95 T.P. Influent TNTC 11/3/92 T.P. Influent TNTC 12/7/92 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 1/12/93 T.P. Influent <1.1/100 mi 2/9/93 T.P. Influent <1.1/100 mi 3/16/93 T.P. Influent <1.1/100 mi 4/6/93 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 5/13/93 T.P. Infiuent present absent 6/7/93 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 7/7/93 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 8/2/93 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 9/7/93 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 10/4/93 T.P. Influent · >23.0/100 mi 12/6/93 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 1/10/94 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 2/7/93 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi i: ~job~95~950035. O0~l:~su~'ey~tableS-4. doc Kenned~Jenks Consultants TABLE 5-4 RAW WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA REDWOOD VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Watershed Sanitary Survey - Upper Russian and Upper Main Eel Rivers K/J 950035.00 Page 2 of 2 Sample Date Location i,. !:~..~. :..Total Coliform ~.. E. ColilFecal .... ~ ~' ~' *'!~:: ~::~i:~ ~' ~ ~ '~ ': Coliform 3/7/94 T.P. Infiuent >23.0/100 mi 4/4/94 T.P. Influent present absent 6/6/94 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 7/5/94 T.P. Influent present absent 8/8/94 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 9/6/94 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 10/3/94 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 11/28/94 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 12/19/94 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 1/17/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 2/6/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 3/6/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 4/10/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 5/1/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 7/3/95 : T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 8/2/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 9/21/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 10/4/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi 11/18/95 T.P. Influent >23.0/100 mi ,Notes: (a) TNTC = Confluent growth without sheen i:~job~95~950035.00Vpt~uwey~ta bleS-4, doc MEMO To: Fro m: Subject: Date: Agenda Packet Subscribers Cathy McKay, City Clerk Council agenda Item 9a. February 21, 1996. . / The map depicting Water Intake and Potential Contaminant Sources dated January 1996, provided in the original Watershed Sanitary Survey for Upper Russian River and Upper Main Eel River, was too large to reproduce to include in this copy. You will find this map in the Public Agenda Packet located on the front counter in front of the City Clerks office in the Ukiah Civic Center, for your reveiw. CALPELLA CWD SERVICE AREA U.S. ARMY CORPS CN:' ENGINEERS LAKE MENDOCINC MENDOCINO PROPOSED LOVER°S CITY OF ut "i IGS N 0 1mi. i Approximate Scale 2mi. 3mi. I CITY OF UKIAH SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY Kennedy/Jenks Consultants City of Ukloh Millview County Woter District Redwood Volley County Woter District · )dotb~9 Wlotow&tor OorvJoo Area ~,..-~ K/J 950035.00 ·. ,. danuory 1996 · :?~ ' ' .... J~lguro 0-1 j- ,J · · 'l :! oo I MENDOCINO -.\ PROPOSED LOVER'S CITY OF UKI^H / BOONVILLE RD MENDOCINO INTAKE ~ FACILITY ... MC~ WEk[S F ACILIT.Y,. ' $ OF UKIAH RANNE Y COLLECTOR 0 lml. 2mi. 3mi. Approximate Scoi® CITY OF UKIAH SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT · ERVlCE AREA BOUNDARY WATER DISTRICT SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES Kennedy/Jenks Consullan t,~ City of Ukioh MIIIvlew County Woter District Redwood Volley County Woter District Water Dletrlot Oervloe Areae '" '~ K/J 95OO35.00 · · '. '-'.' ~. · .,: Jonuory 1996 'i "'~.~ 'i:- ':" ' ,':-.i:,Figure · . · · · _ · ' .. ' "CITY OF UKIAH ~94 ANNUAL. WATER QUALITY REPORT .. ' - ~ ':' ";' ' ' ' '".; ,;'"" '-'t- '..,;. _-. . - .c. ". '" "*-' · · ;;-. -'t . .. · .. : .,~..- ; _~ i '~'- :-" .. ' .... ~-~ ".. ,- . .... "L:.' ' ., . . · _ ' ., .:,. ,', ~ . ' _ . - ,..~ ..4, ,,'.. ,'.'~;,~. ~ .' ',......,....' ~ , .~ , - ~. :,; ~' . · .. . ,~, , -~ ...o .,.,.~- ,. '.,.,....':. -~... · -,~, :..:,,' ,..,.. · · . · - '.··.",,~. ~ '* , · ,. · ~ ,~· -,' . - · ' o. ..'.. .~,...... ..- .. . . , ~. ~.,' ..... ..... - -,~ ,...:.- , ,. .... '..: ,'. . .. .. ~ . ... ..:. .; . ..... ;;~.' ,;,_~ .- :-.._ -~., .. .--. - .. ~ · .... . '. . .,...- . ~.. , ... ; , .~, .... ·:. . · .....,. . : · : . . '..' ._ . ._..:,. · .... ;.~-.' , -~::..,,..'. -. · . . .~".'~ '. ,.' ; ....~--: .,- ..:~.,. - . ,~. - · ,:. ,r .. _ . '~ ~ ,~'..., '..,-~ · : ~ -~o- .... . . . ~....- ' '. " :;', . - '.'~. i . : "'" ' ~ '"' ' "~ '"~ ?:'" :~ ::(';:",":'~ '"~ '-' :i~':'."'.,' · ' :::"'-. :: ; ri.-,.-.;.., .... ...;..'J'-". ' " : : . ' - ~'.- ' '*;,' --o'~ .,,-,:t.:...°' s.: : '.... ..... '..." .. :.-..?" .~ .. · . .... . .-,.". ,../.~. .... ,'...'/::.~. ',...' ... ~.-., ..... :..~...:.-... · . ..... ~:... -,:. .:, .? '' ', ' - .,... ,-.,...; . . , ., ,..,r ,. ,~.. : . ,..'~ .- . . ... ,- - .. . _.: .i'.; : ~ .;.:...~; ..... ..~. ~". ~. ', , .' · _.'.,.} o''.~ ',. . &. . , .~: ~ ".. , . ', , · ....... ,,._ ~ ........ . . .,.. ?.-,*' ... ..- ·...:. : - ?'~' : : ~ .., -....... , ~. ,,~."... ~.,:' ,:~. ,....,.. ..'..,..,:- , .; · , , .. ..;.....'.:.?~ , . . · ,. . ...., -. · . o · .... · ' '. . ' .*.,,. ' -' t, .. · - ': ~. ," ' ' · , · ~., . . :.' .-..:. ~:'. ~'.'~ . ' '...:..:.~;'~., ~::::' ";:;"!"!L~'.:.-.",,.?::; ,~:.:: -'-~-/'? ;';':.: ,; ..'.'...!- ':'-'.. -, i':.': '-.,'-.,;. .- ,.° , - . '." ' -' .' . "..-- ·: ,' "., ~' :".,-:'. ' t - "'. ~ .'",~. :-.' ,t' ;... ' '..-¥ :' ~' '," "~; ,- · " '. · . .. · '~ ' :. ' '. ' ,. -.. ,, · .. ~. , .,.../ :,~.-~. .-; ..;~, '~ .... :.:~ .~ -,'..':: ..- /., . ... ~',,· .... .~ : .:... . . .-: -, · ~ , · .....-,.....· . '...., , ,..(. ~.'~-'~' ~...:.,:':,, ;..:....:.. .- -..-,~ -. _.', .~.- .-.....-, . -':.,, . ~.,~. . , . . . .:.: ., .,-,:.. :-..- :.-, '-~,. o .~...... .. ,..-..~, ., · ;..,:..: .,. ;...... . -. . ,'. 4. . .' .' . .. ~..., · - - '' .' .' · ' , ;~" " /.'~ .... ' ." ~',.' · ' 4 . ' -, :'t .' ' , : ~ . · -'~.', · '.· ' .... ~",. .,', ,. :~.~'.' ~...'., '. ~.t,.,..-.' ,..,..;.. :-.~ .' .... .,..., ;'-,. ~,'L.,~', . ." ' -. ') , . ,. - · · , '. · '. . - .. ~'~ , ' , .,1 * '". ., .... . ~ .. .,., .... · ., . .i °.,. . ..; . ,. o , ~ ~. ,. .,. · · - , . . .:~ ,.. ; '. * , . ' .. / ,' . .. , · . .- '. ~' '.. .-'...:, ' ~. :' . '.'-,'. ' .... ' . , . ~ ' : · . , ,. -,-.. . ..;;,, .:..' ..~ .:,.\ ~.:'-~,' ... ,,-~:,.... .:* -~ ... -. .~...-., : ; ~:,' ., ~. · . . ._,~ { .' · , , . ~, ; · ,.,......., .,,..~ . .~ .... .o ,.- e- . ... .;, . , . , , , . ,. . . . - '',.. , .,, , ~' v~' · ; . .- ; ;'...,... , ~; : . ~- ~. .' %,~ '~;... ,. - ,,.' , ,. : -. .... . ~ >' -., . ,: ~ * . · , - - . · · ' . '' ; ' .... : ~;"' ~·' ' ' "' ," · ' ·. . , -~. . .;-,. ',~'·.-..~.., ., .'? , . ~, . ._. . .- ',~ ,. . ~ - · · , ..% ..'~ .. ° ' .' . . - . . ". · - . · - .. - .,~ . -._, .,¥ . ' *. :...; .--.. .... ..'~,e- .~. -.~..~o .~ .; - -'... ' .' ' . ·. ,o .'-°. · . . .. .,., ~. ; · , ,.. .~,;~ . , ,,.-,., .:.¢.~. .'., , :. o ~. ,?~..~,/~_,...o.,, ,- ° , ~.,, .,o. , ... .:,;. - -~,- , ._ , . -- . · . ...-. ,- -.. ~-.,... , ~.',' .~., -:--., . o_ .- . -',~, ,'-,'.',:--.,. : '..,, .' .... --, - . ~. - _-. ,~'; .' ,.. , . -' ,, . ' . "'":'°,. ~"..' ' ''o:~';'~.'~,~.~ -,_~.,...~,...;.,. ~.,,:..% .~.°.. · ..- ..-. ~.:.--.,~, ..~. -.. - ', . ,,. . . .. . ,, ,;'. ..... -,~, .- --~,~.. · ,- ,..,.~.. .,. , . ,,,.', .. . . -.. . - . , . .... · .. - .~ ~ , ' ~.; ~ ~':-.-., --..~., ..-. , ... . - ,..,.,.·,,., ~ ...- . ; ". '"- 'e' .":. ~ " '' ', ' ' " ~ . · - · ' ' - '"~ .' ':' ~"~t'' '; 4~ ', -. '"~)T '~.~. ~ .~'~ ~.~. . -·~,':" %~,.'.... .'- .... ', '~'. '~ · ., ~ · " · , ,- ' .. : ". ~- ,. . .~ '. ~.' . '; ~ '%,,~..- .. ",.-. -'~4 ',.~-" , ' '. ~: ' ' ' : ,' ' - : ~" . '.' '- .... '. . - , -. " . - *' ~-.: ,."'...~.~-.' .-''~ .i :;'.'~- '':-, '.. '/' .~'- -; ?',;:--~. ' ' "-~ . - : ' , '. .., ' - . .-. -; ,.:'~'~"; '-~'_.,_.'-:' .4- ~,: .,,~"?~,:'.,~'~,,.,.:, ~-.- .... :.'~ '..-. :.'.'- .' · . '.,' -.... .... .-'. · · .. . . .,-' :. - · '-' - ' '~ ' ":' ·" . '- ':' "~." ~'," ':'~:" ') ".' '. ~ "~." , ~'.,' '; - '" "~: '~ *~,~ :. '!"- ' -;7' "~ ' · , · .'. ';. ' :' . "' ' - '.~ , ' · '.' '" .'. " '" -'. ' · ,':~ -, '.' "~' :;, '~ "~' ; · ': ' "' '.-~: ~'". ?.' · "'-'~ ~ .';..".'-. ".. ,.-'.- '." -. c .-;~; , ., ~, '-' -., ' ' · .'. ~ ,. . . .. -. · , .. ,: .. !-,.- ~...:: .~.: .,... ~,. --,);'~,~'?: ..' .;,:-,.~': .-'.-~,~:..',- ,.. ~:. - ~ .~ '-.. :~: . . . ~.. ;: ,.' ~ . · . , ... · - ' ' - e'- ~:' ~": ~ .~ ". '~ '-"'~" ~' .....,.'. ,.. o-~ ,;:' '.4: .~, ".~,. --' ....~ .. ~ ... ~.., .· . . . . . ,, ~. :, t: . , . -, ,.. , , '. : ,' .' .. '. ,'-'4~.:-', '~'.. '.'.'..-~.':,.:'::.~.~;,,.~.~'..~.~, '2'; '.',~'~',.:?..'~.'~:.'~. :.'.:~ -.? '.;~ .*.~.' :-,' :',-~'.-' '' .' · ' '" '": ":...: ..- · ' ~'" '"' '*~.-~: 'L'""~': '~ L"-';,.; ". ::' - ~:.~:";,'*."'~';~'.~,"~'-"L·~t~':'~.~ '~.~, /~;' ,-"-- ,' ;'.'.~':.'" ".; : . -' :.,.' :4.. .:'' · ' "' ' ' ':- '""- :'' "' '""~""'-*'**"'~'I '~'"~' tt,~,., , ·,,-.; .~"~:..v ,. '~ ..~.'~, -."'...',.- ..-,-~-., . .~..- '- ~:. -- .,. ~- . .,.. ...... ... .: ~, . ~.;~.,~.,.,., .~',;~.-' ...- .; .... -.~ .... .,,,..~...~4::..:"..;, ~. ~, ,-,· , ~.: .., %.. · .~ ~.. .~ .. . .... - .- ' '. ' ,' ~ ',',, ' ~' '. .... . .""-,..-~4,',,:~'-.-'~ ~-' . '.;; ~'' ,~ -'~ ·.. f, ' ;'~' ,. '- -- -. ~ '' ' .' ~ ' " 4-';,' *,' ""~ '-~ ~', ~...: "'. ; ' '~ .'~' c'-~ -:: '~ - ";~ -~ ' '~- -" o" °, , . , ' ,' ' .~ ' · .' '- · .". . - : :.. ,'-'~." "' ''- ' '~'- ' ", ? ~'" ~'": ' ''.'~ '~ -~" '~'"'~' ':::. ~'~"'"'::-L'"';.' -;" °'-'" -":' -': '" ."< '," ' ,.--' .' ~ L....: .- . . . ~ ;- . ,,?..,,. . .'. ,- .--.. .. ,.; , .',, ;>..,'..~;- ,.,..~,~ '-,,~-_,~..~.'~,,o .., . . , ,- ,;. -~ ,.- · ,~..:~ ,,--. -.._ -~ . -, . '~-- ':, . .. . .... '-'; ';'" .... "4 ,' ~': "~.'~ ',':'~ :o-"~' '. -i "~';~-~'"--:';'~" - ;'--'-~",;.'~.; ""~':; -~'*' . '"~.' '-'~ ' -~ "" : ? -': "-' "' '-"'. ,';' '.. · .'.. ': ':.'~; ","~' "*:"'.~'.- ,* ~'~- :"c: '.;"?'.;! -:,,'~; :~',:..'-'~" .':~ ;'?',,',"'.-"'; '-:".~ ~ '-,.~-:~',,',-. '-';'',-".': '. -.' ' ' .... ". '- ..(:-:.~, ..-. -' .- -~- "%~:' '~' .',~,,::t",'~ ."'~?;.' :~'"':':' , .... '::';- '.'.': .... ','"'.~ ..... : ' · ', · ~ - . ,. -' .' .'~ ~ ' ',,~ ' ~ ~..'-''~. . .:','r~ - ' ;'- .~ · .'~' ~'-' ~' -:...~ -,. ''. .... -' .... . ' ,' , · . '.t ....'.."*," ' ~' ',' '°:' '- ~"'-'; "*''~'';t,° h -'.'~ ~.*-.-,, '~'~.X'. ' "' ,' - ,4; ·'. , ..,t - '' - . . ' .'- .' '-;--' · ~,;'> .' '-'' .,., ',-'._t ' .-'~"',~.' '~:' '."~' ~ .'/. '."'~ ' ',,~ ' '~ ..', ~.' . ~'- . ' -, . ' . ALpha AnaLyticaL Laboratories 860 Waugh Lane, Uklah CA 95482 (707) 468-0401 Date Invoice 0]/16/95 )9929 INVOICE Page 1 BILL TO: MiL[view County Water Diatrlct 3081 North State Street Uklah, CA 95482 RESULTS TO: Mt[[view County Water District ]081 North State Street Uklah, CA 95~82 Attn: Mark Richardson Attn: Mark Richardson Batch Nmber Receipt Date CLient CLient P.O. Send Via Terms 95-0228-001 02/27/95 11:30 MC~ Mai[ Net 30 days Batch 95-0228-001 consisted of 2 SampLes and 59 Tests SimpLe 1 Russian River Initial Tests Performed: TX-RADIO-W SampLed by: CLient TitLe 2.2/21 Radioactivity Gross ALpha SampLe 2 WeLL #8 SampLed by: CLient 02/27/95 10:30 Water Tests Performed: TI-GENHIN-W TitLe 22 General Mineral TI-GENPHY-W TitLe 22 General Physical TI-INORG-W TitLe 22 Inorganics AA'ANTGFoW Antimony GF AA-BERYFL-W Beryttlua ~U~-#IC3(FL-W Nickel AA-TNALGF-W Tha[tiLKGF VC-#ITRI#-W #ttrlte-Nltrogen ZE-ACALC-W Aggressive Index CaLcuLation WC-AL[H-W ALkaLinity, Hydroxide ZE-OTHER-O Other - EPA 507 ZE-OTHER-O Other - EPA 531.1 OR-EPA5151-W ChLorinated Acld Nerbicldes ZE-OTHER-O Other - E?A 5~9 (Diquat) ZE-OTHER-O Other - EPA 5~8 (~ndol~ha~) OR-EDB-W Ethylene Dibromide VO-5OZ.Z-W VoLatiLe Organic Compounds OR-EPAS08 Chtorinatad Pesticides OR-DIURON-W Diuron Karmex TZ-RADIO-V TitLe 22/21 Radioactivity Gross ALpha OL-ASBESTO-~ Asbestos 02/27/95 10:00 Water Std TAT S50.00 S140.00 $~0.00 S160.00 S18.00 S15.00 S15.00 $18.00 S18.00 ~40.00 $15.00 $125.00 $180.00 S150.00 S160.00 S1ZO.O0 S110.00 S200.00 S135.00 S120.00 S50.00 $245.00 PLEASE PRINT INVOICE NUNBER ON CHEC~I Net Tote[ S2,12~.00 ................................. THAN[ YOU! Misc. Charges SaLes Tax Sending Charges ................................. INVOICE TOTAL S2,124.00 clT~ oP uT~2~ ~ W]S, TER OU]S~TY REPORT - ~9p4 · . FEBRUARY 1995' ...'.i' ,,~, In an e£ffor~ to keep our customers informed, the C£ty of Ukiah issues an Annual Report to our customers de$cr£bing the clual£ty of your d~£nk£ng water. · -. The City of Ukiah £e dedicated to providing you with a eafe and reliable supply of high quality drinking water. We continually test our water ueing not only our own testing equipment, but that of experienced water testing laboratories. We &ak that you take i few minutes to read through this report to learn more about your water quality. · PARAMETER UNITS MAXIMU~ SURFACE GROUND CONTAMINANT WATER WATER LEVEL i , i ~rimary Standards~- Mandatory Health-Related Standards Established by the State of California, Department of Health Services. MICROBIOLOGICAL Coliform E. Coil/Fecal Coliform Presence/Absence Presence/Absence Absent Absent Absent Absent ORGANIC CHEMICALS Total Trihalomethanes Atrazine Benzene' Carbon Tetrachloride 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene 1, 2-Dichloroethane . 1, 1-Dichloroethylene 1, 3-Dichloropropane Ethylbenzene Monochlorobenzene Simazine 1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethylene Vinyl Chloride Xylenes Cia-l, 2-Dichloroethylene Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethylene 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1, 2-Dichloropropane Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) 1, 1, 2-Trichloro-1, 2, 2- Trifluoroethane (Freon 113) Carbofuran mg/1 0.10 mg/1 0.003 mg/1 0.001 mg/1 0.0005 mg/1 0.005 mg/1 0.0005 mg/1 0.006 mg/1 0.0005 mg/1 0.70 mg/1 0.030 mg/1 0.01 mg/1 0.001 mg/1 0.005 mg/1 0.200 mg/1 0.032 mg/1 0.005 mg/1 0.0005 mg/1 1.750 · mg/1 0.006 mg/1 0.01 mg/1 0.005 mg/1 0.005 mg/1 0.15 rog/1 1.20. mg/i o.o18 < - Less Than '* - Sampled in 1992 mg~ = M~ ~ BM (l~rts Her ntilllon) ND = None detected .0062 .024 .0062-.024 ND** ND** ND~* ND** ND** ~D** ND** ND** ND** ND** , ND** ND** · ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ... ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** _ ND** ND** ND** ND** .... ND** ND** , ~D** ND** ~D** ND** ,,, ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** ND** MILLVIEW COUNTY WATER DISTRICT.1994 ANNUAL WATER QUALITY REPORT ~P~ ANALYTIC~ ~BO~TORIES, INC. EDT - 860 WAUGH LANE ~I~, CA 95482 RADIOACTIVITY ~YSIS (8/93) Sample ID No.95-0228-1-1 Signature La~ Employed By:Millvi~w CWD Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Received @ Lab: 95/02/27/1130 Completed: 95/03/03 System System Name= MILLVIEW CWD Nu~er= 2310006 Name or Number of Sample Source~ RUSSI~ RI~R INTAKE ~ate of Report= 03/17/95 Laboratory Name~ TRUESDAIL LABS Name of Sampler:Client Date/Time Sample Collected: 95/02/27/1000 User ID: RXR ~¥ HM DD TTTT Submitted by~ Station Number~ C23/006-RRIVERI * Laboratory Code= 9469 * YYMMDD * Phone #= · I MCL REPORT UNITS CONSTITUENT I STORET i ANALYSES I DLRI CODE RESULTS 15 pCi/1 Total Alpha pCi/1 Total Alpha Counting Error 50 pCi/1 Total Beta poi/1 Total Beta Counting Error ,: 20 pCl/1 Natural Uranium pCi/1 Natural Uranium Counting Error pci/1 Total Radium 226 pCi/1 Total Radium 226 Counting Error pci/1 Total Radium 228 pCi/1 Total Radium 228 Counting Error 5 pCi/1 Ra 226 + Ra 228 pCi/1 Ra 226 + Ra 228 Counting Error pCi/1 Total Radon 222 pCi/1 Total Radon 222 ~ounting Error 20000 pCi/1 Total Tritium pCi/1 Total Tritium Counting Error 8 pCi/1 Total Strontium 90 pCi/1 Total Strontium 90 Counting Error 01501 J 0.00i 01502 1.66 03502 28012 09501 09502 11501 11502 11503 11504 82303 82302 07000 07001 13501 13502 4.0 2.0 .5 100.0 1.0 2.0 ~ PJ~GE 2 OF 2 95-0228-1-1 .aboratory comments and description of any additional compounds found: Comparable to Laboratory Background ,ate of Report:'03/17/95 Laboratory Name: ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABS Name of Sampler~Client Date/Time Sample Collected~ 95/02/27/1030 ALPHA ARALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. EDT 860 WAUGH LANE UKIAH, CA 95482 GENERAL MINERAL & PHYSICAL, & INORGANIC ANALYSIS (8/93) Sample ID No.95-0228-1-2 Signature Employed By~Hillview CWD Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Received @ Labt 95/02/27/1130 Completed= 95/03/10 ! System System ; Name~ MILLVIEW CWD Numbers 2310006 ' Name or Number of Sample Sources WELL 08 * User ID~ RXR * Y~ MM DD TTTT * * * Submitted by= Station Number~ 15N/12W-05M01 M * Laboratory Code: 1610 * * YY MM DD * Phone #t * CONSTITUENT mg/L · Total Hardness (as CaCO3) 00900 mg/L Calcium (Ca) 00916 mg/L Magnesium (Mg) 00927 mg/L Sodium (NA) 00929 mg/L Potassium (K) 00937 Total Cations * * mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L* mg/L* mg/L mg/L Meq/L V&lue~ 2°5 J Total Alkalinity (AS CatO3) Hydroxide (OH) Carbonate (CO3) Bicarbonate (HCO3} Sulfate (SO4) Chloride (Cl) Nitrate (as NO3) Fluoride (F} Temp. De~end. ./ Total Anions Me~/L Value: 2.4 ii i Std. Units PH (LaboratorF) ** umho/cm** Specific Conductance (E.C.) *** mg/L*** Total Filterable Residue at 180C (TDS) Units. AppareNt Color (Unfiltered) TON Odor Threshold at 60 C NT~ Lab Turbidity 0.5 mg/L MBAS 00410 71830 00445 00440 00945 00940 71860 00951 00403 00095 70300 00081 00086 82079 38260 105 24 11 7.4 1.0 77 ND ND 94 15 9.5 16 ND 7.8 216 108 ND ND 0.35 ND 0.5 0.1 250-500-600 ** 900-1600-2200 500-1000-'1500 **** 1.4-2.4 PAGE 2 OF 2 -- ! UNITS INORGANIC CHEMICALS CONSTITUENT 1000 ug/L 50 ug/L 1000 ug/L '***' 10 ug/L 50 ug/L 1000 ug/L 300 ug/L 50 ug/L 50 ug/L 2 ug/L ***** 10 ug/L 50 ug/L 5000 ug/L Aluminum (Al) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Total Ct) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese Mercury (Ng) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Zinc (Zn) 95-0228-1-2 01105 0~002 01007 01027 01034' 01042 01045 01051 01055 71900 01147 01077 01092 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.0 2.0 100.0 1.0 10.0 50.0 100.0 5.0 30.0 1.0 5.0 10.0 50.0 ADDITIONAL ANALYSES ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Agressiveness Index Nitrite as Nitrogen(N) Beryllium Thallium Nickel Antimony 82383 00620 01012 01059 01067 01097 11.5 ND ND ND ND ND 400 1.0 1.0 10.0 6.0 ***** New or revised MCL pending ~tLPHAANALYTICAL LABORATOR/ES~ INC. EDT 860 WAUGH LANE UKIAJI, CA 95482 GENERAL MINERAL & PHYSICAL, & INORGANIC ANALYSIS (8/93) mate of Report= 03/17/95 Sample ID No.95-0228-1-2 Names ASBESTOS TEMLABORATORIES Directors Name of Sampler=Client Employed By=Hillview CWD ' ' ~ Date/Time Sample Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Collected= 95/02/27/1030 Received @ Lab= 95/02/27/1130 Completed= 95/03/09 System System Name= HILLVIEW CWD Numbers 2310006 Name or Number of Sample Source= WELL 08 User ID= RXR YY HH DD TTTT Submitted by~ Station Numbers 15N/12W-05H01 H * Laboratory Code= 1866 * YYF~DD * Phone F= . ******************************************************************************** PAGE i OF I ADDITIONAL ANALYSES UNITS # J RESULTS · ***** HFL Asbestos o.',81 o.: o New or revised HCL pending ,ate of Report: 03/17/95 Laboratory Name= ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABS Name of Sampler:Client Date/Time Sample Collected: 95/02/27/1030 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. EDT 860 WAUGH LANE UKIAH, CA 95482 ORGANIC CHEHICAL ANALYSIS (8[93 Sample ID No.95-0228-1-2 Employed By:H£11v~iew CWD Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Received @ Labs 95/02/27/1130 Completed: 95/03/10 System System Names HILLVIEW CWD Numbers 2310006 Name or Number of Sample Source= WELL 08 * User ID: RXR * D.t./=im. of Sample: 1951o212711o3ol ~ YY MM DD TTTT Submitted bys Station Number: 15N/12W-05H01H Laboratory Code: 1610 I 10 ! 01 Y¥ HM DD Phone ~s PAGE I OF 3 REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS ' I TEST I CONSTITUENT . HETHOD ALL CONSTITUENTS REPORTED ug/L Def. No. 502.2 RESULTS 'MCL DLR ug/Llug/LI 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 5O2.2 502.2 502.2 5O2.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502 · 2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Chloroform (Trichloromethane) Dibromochloromethane Total Trihalomethanes (THH'S/ TTHH) Benzene Carbon Tetrachloride Ethyl Benzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p-DCB) 1,1-Dichloroethane (1,1-DCA) 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) 1,1-Dichloroethylene (1,1-DCE} cis-l,2-Dlchloroethylene (c-i,2-DCE} trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene (t-I,2-DCE) 1,2-Dlchloropropane Total 1,3-Dichloropropene Honochlorobenzene (Chlorobenzene) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (1,1,2-TCA) Trichloroethylene (TCE) Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) Trichlorotrifluoroethane (FREON 113) Vinyl Chloride (VC) m,p-Xylene o-Xylene Total Xylenes (m,p, & o) 32101 32104 32106 32105 82080 ND ND 2.4 ND 2.4 34030 32102 34371 34571 34496 34531 34501 77093 34546 34541 34561 34301 34516 34475 34506 34511 39180 34488 81611 39175 A-014 77135 81551 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 100 0.5 i 0.5 .5 0.5 **680 0.5 5 0.5 5 0.5 .5 0.5 ** 6 0.5 6 O.5 10 0.5 5 0.5 .5 0.5 ** 30 0.5 i 0.5 5 0.5 200 0.5 32 0.5 5 0.5 150 5.0 1200 10.0 .5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1750 0.5 508 Endrin 39390J ND I**-= 0. 0 PAGE 2 OF 3 REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS CONTINUED 95-0228-1-2 "} TEST METHOD CONSTITUENT ALL CONSTITUENTS REPORTED ug/L ANALYsEs RESULTS I MC;. ug/LI' DLR ug/Li 508 5O8 5O8 508 508 515.1 515.1 515.1 Methoxychlor Toxaphene Chlordane Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Bentazon (BASAGRAN) 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) 39480 39400 39350 39410 39420 38710 39730 39045 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND *'100 10.0 ** 5 1.0 .1 0.1 .01 0.01 .01 0.01 18 2.0 *'100 10.0 ** 10 1.0 UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 5O2.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 502.2 Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Chloroethane 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride) 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromomethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m-DCB) Dichlorodifluoromethane Dlchloromethane(Methylene. Chloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane 2,2-Dichloropropane 1,1-Dichloropropene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) p-Isopropyltoluene Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene l,l,l,2-Tetrachloroeth&ne Toluene ~,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Nethyl ethyl ketone (~LEK, Butanone) Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK} 81555 A-012 34413 A-010 77350 77353 34311 34576 34418 A-008 A-009 77596 34536 34566 34668 34423 77173 77170 77168 34391 77223 A-011 34696 77224 77~28 77562 34010 77613 34551 77443 77222 77226 81595 81596 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5.0 5.0 508 508 ~15.1 515.1 5O8 515.1 508 Aldrin Chlorothalonil (DACONIL, BRAVO) Dalapon Dicamba (BANVEL). Dieldrin Dinoseb (DNBP) Hexachlorobenzene 39330 70314 38432 82052 39380 81287 39700 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND O.075 5.0 10.0 0.081 0.02 2.0 0.5 · PJ%GE 3 OF 3 UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEHICALS CONTINUED 95-0228-1-2 TEST J CONSTITUENT HETHOD J ALL CONSTITUENTS REPORTED ug/L # i~sur~TSI ug/r. lug/r./ 515.1 515.1 5O8 508 Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Picloram Polychlorinated BIphenyls (Total PCB's) Propachlor 39032 39720 39516 38533 ND ND ND ND ** 0.2 ** 1.0 ** 0.5 0.5 New or revised ~CL pending ate of Report: 03/17/95 Laboratory Name: NORTH COAST LABS Name of Sampler=Client Date/Time Sample Collected: 95/02/27/1030 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. EDT . 860 WAUGH LANE UKIAH, CA 95482 ORGANIC CHEHICAL ANALYSIS (8/93} Sample ID No.95-0228-1-2/.q Signature La~ Director, Employed By:M£11View CWD w , -~_~ Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Received @ Lab: 95/02/27/1130 Completed= 95/03/13 System System Name: MILLVIEW CWD Number: 2310006 Name or Number of Sample Source: WELL 08 * User ID: RXR * Y¥ MM DD TTTT * * Submitted by: Station Number: 15N/12W-05M01M * Laboratory Code: 3334 * * Date Analysis Completed: 1 1031 31 * YYMMDD * Phone #: · PAGE i OF I REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS Neg Def No.000000 I ENTRY I ANALYSES RESULTS I MCL ug/LI 504 507 507 507 507 531.1 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) Atrazine (AATREX) Molinate (ORDRAM) Simazine (PRINCEP) Thiobencarb (BOLERO) Carbofuran (FURADAN) 77651 39033 82199 39055 A-001 81405 ND ND ND ND ND ND UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS .02 O. 02 3 1.0 20 2.0 ** 10 1.0 70 1.0 18 5.0 531.1 531.1 531.1 507 5O7 531.1 507 S07 549 632 548.1 531.1 507 531.1 507 507 Aldicarb (TEMIK) Aldicarb Sulfone Aldicarb Sulfoxide Bromacil (HYVAR) Butachlor Carbaryl (Sevin) Dlazinon Dimethoate (CYGON) Diquat Dluron Endothall Methomyl Metolachlor Oxamyl (Vydate) Prometryn (CAPAROL) Propachlor 39053 A-020 A-019 82198. 77860 77700 39570 38458 78885 39650 38926 39051 39356 38865 39057 38533 ** New or revised MCL pending ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.0 4.0 3.0 10.0 0.38 5.0 0.25 10.0 4.0 1.0 45.0 2.0 20.0 2.0 0.5 ,ate of Report= 03/17/95 Laboratory Name~ TRUESDAIL LABS Name of Sampler:Client Date/Time Sample Collected~ 95/02/27/1030 ~P~ ~YTIC~ ~BO~TORIES, INC. EDT 860 WAUGH L~E UKI~, CA 95482 RADIOACTIVITY~YSIS (8/93}. Sample ID No.95-0228-1-2 Employed By:Millview C~ Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Received @ Labs 95/02/27/1130 Completed: 95/03/03 System System Name~ MILLVIEW CWD Numbers 2310006 Name or Number of Sample Source: WELL 08 * User ID: RXR * YY ~ DD TTTT * Submitted by: Station Number: ~SN/12W-05M01 M * Laboratory Code: 9469 * * YY MM DD * Phone #: * ']~ MCL REPORT CONSTITUENT UNITS I STORET I ANALYSES I DLR I CODE P, ESULTS 15 pCi/1 Total Alpha pCi/1 Total Alpha Counting Error 50 pCi/l'Total Beta pCi/l Total Beta Counting Error 20 pCi/1 Natural Uranium pCi/1 Natural Uranium Counting Error pCi/1 Total Radium 226 pCi/1 Total Radium 226 Counting Error pCi/1 Total Radium 228 pCi/1 Total Radium 228 Counting Error 5 pCi/1 Ra 226 + Ra 228 pCi/l Ra 226 + Ra 228 Counting Error pCi/f Total Radon 222 pCi/1 Total Radon 222 Counting Error 20000 pCi/1 Total Tritium pCi/1 Total Tritium Counting Error 8 pCi/1 Total Strontium 90 pCi/1 Total Strontium 90 Counting Error 01501I 1'18! 01502 1.96 03501 A-028 09501 09502 11501 11502 11503 11504 82303 82302 · 07000 07001 15501 13502 4.0 2.0 .5 100.0 1.0 2.0 0o Z -r 0 ". , , ' "' "~ ~-. '..~r~ ., , ! '.' ~ '.. '~ """ :' '~ ~ ' ~ ,' . · ' '..' · ." · : .".. ~ . . *.. . ,.~., .,~.. 7> ...... ', ', *'"'' '-' ~ ' ' ' '~ *' ~ ' ' ' '~*'" " '~ " · ,..,:.-/'~ '.,~.. : ". .~.. .:.,-.. .-.. ..... ..-~,. '>. ..... ---...*.**,*_.~.,,,'.~. ¥.'**, ..,....~... ',.: .,. ~; .. *. . . r* ' .... -; ",' ' *,':-~ ';~ -'~". ' ".: .... *** *" .*- · · '"' · '~' *. *~ .;:".,. ~','"' .: '~ · '~ ~ . ' ' · * "*, ' · : .- '*' .... '*'..' *. ','~ :~, ~ ~ .., '~ ........ "a,,*..;~. '*~ ...' **-~' .;* ~. ,,..: ,-..'**~:". .... ', '~.'~ ~..'-.' ' .." . .. . ~. ~ ,:~'. -.,:., ,..~**:..~..,.. ,....,_.;.~..-....,,."~.*,. ',..~:., .,',..~,-:,.~ .... ,~... ~.-,,. ,. - , .. .... ,...; ~_...'....' ~. -*,.. .... . .,~-.. *~. **' *..,~..~....~ ~.~ ,..._*_..*.,.~.- ~. ,- ~ ***. ,., . ..' .'. ". . · '* '~'., *... "' '.' --'.~: * ~.,. ,"'~ '~ 3'' ,~-'' ~ -' .' ;.'*..~ .-"*-' -: '-' ' ' · °: ~'.-. .-' :.~.:.;'.**..~- .~..,~ .',,.>....'..~..... :~.. ~.:.,*..'::':.,,,*.~..~.~ **.~¥. **~,,/.. .:-., ;.......~,._'~ . .:. . . - .~ .:,.., .. . . ~. · ... · . ,.. ,. ~. '.,. *~. ? ~. . . ., . . .. · · '. . .. * - _., - ,~.. . .., ... , .'.,. ~,, - , ,. ~.-,.. .. ,, , :. · ..., *.. ~.. . ,~ .. -. -.. . ~ · , ~ .- · -' .' '.. . ~'~*. ,~ '.'. *' .... '.',*.r,;',,'..* ' , *>..-.~.' :':~ ~' *'.?': r. · *' .*.': '.-:.' · :'~ . .~' ~ ~ - .,., :~ ,, . .· . '. : ~:~' .... ~ ...'; -.~ ;..._,.'. ~,, ~ * :.....::. ~-.. ~.. : ,.. ? '~.- .. ~....- ; ~ ..'. ;',;: .; , ,' ' :': ' " *. -",' .:'"' '*, *: '*-";,"'"*,"'"': ':-*'-:' **""" "* *: 'i :- ' .;.., ,. ;..* .... .. · .- ~ · : , . ~ ;* -; · -.,j ,.. .' . . .".-.. ~ :: ~. ,:~.: ~ .~ ,'. ~ ' 'v.- .'. ~ .. -.,, '.,..".,i_:' · . . ~ ~ *_.:-' ~,**~,' ,.~.~,,q ~. :..:.': ...-. ...... ,~.- ..: .. -.** , , ...,.., .,. · . . , .., .;',_.. ...... ,,. ...... · , ,.. . . ..,...: ,,. .. . .'_~ .... , *"~'..'. .:~., ,'.:-' . : - i',:':;-.. ,':.:,-".'..:.-:'>, .... "' APPENDIX C · , ,.. · . . . . -REDwooD VALLEY' cOU'N' 'Y'WATE ' DIS;i;RICT 1994 ANNUAL '-' . ::..: '" .~.: ,' . . -: .'. . . . ' WATER QUALITYREPORT · . _ · . "i;_ .-:',.i ':" ':.: ';... ".','-.. , "' _ .- '., . ...,,...,;.,... ~ .... ~.~ :...,':'.-~: - ,,:..,.:-.:.,:,.,~:¥".* . ,. · . _ . ' . :'. ,<; ' . ...... .;:.- ' .. - . : . . ,. . .'::..'....:-'. · .. ... ..' -', i'.,.~.",;,.,,:..--..... .,.. _: .... .:... , ~ ,- .~. ,- , , ,- ' f *.~.:; %,'. ~ · - ~, · .. ~; ,.. ., ...;., .. '- . .' '- -;" .... * "' ':': '.;* ~:'i' ":- ~: ':-"?;. ': · ,'-., _.."....:."-' .* ', · .' · :.., - , .. .,~., .... ,.,-: .... ¢ ~. -.;:...'... ,.,': .... ._ ... ; '. -..., .) ':. . .'..," ~, *.. .- *....*... . ,.. -...,. . ..._ _.. : . . · ,..' . ;* ; ........ ~ . ,-~'. .. ,* ,." . ,'~, , :..', '. .*,,* . .. ,- .. , .,; . .... ~ ~: ,..'- ,. -:,.'..- .,.~. : .. -;..,,... . . ;... - . ..... - "-- . _ :i,:-; ;".'.-""' :.,,.. ;-. ",:.'.:'-'...- .""':., '"'-' ' '""' , '""'"'-"':'.'"'"' ' ' :' :'" ':' . .... . .. :.'.. . · .'. . ....:~.~ ,:...~...~...,.: ._ ,.._.. ,.~..;,. . .... ,_ -.,~. ' -' . · :?' ' ' ~. ' ~'.'.--L . ,.: ,~,. ;., .: .~ ...._ ,, . ... - '' ~. :"' .r...' ", '-' · ;: ' , ,. · · ,.... , . ,.',;.~." ~ ,. · ... .','.'. . . :.', ....... .,,,",,;;,..',~:..' :,.,j-, · :..' ...:. . . . , . .,., . .. ,-.,.._... ,'..: ,:'....-,...,,...,.:.*.,~ ... : .. . ... ... ',., ,,',','; .... ;,~;,. ~.~ .,. , ~ . .:' ,.-,'.,.:.:-' .:.'.,..'. .. '. .; '~ -'- ": , . ~.. , . ..... : ~1 - .'.'.. .;..., .. -....., .. ...: ....... ..:,.~ .,:~, .. :..:-.:~,,~ · . ::.,.., , :.:::-::...:;:.:...:, :,-, :, .,.:: . , ,. ., ....: ....... . .... :.... ~ :.. ~::.:'.:.:.'::~ . :_-.: .., ..~ .:¥;::~ ::,:','.':.. ..... :. .-. .., ..,...... ~...,. .. o . ¢-.-.. ,.. · · · ....: ....., .... ..: ...... .-. .... ...... .., ; .. -'.,:...':'.. · .' . :_ - - .. *.,t· .~ , ., . ,.. .~ .· ., ~.-. ., . ... ~-.....,: · . . .... . ....:~..~..; ...... , .... . . : , .!'- ...: :, .',_'. ~' · - :,. · . . .,~ .,.~,~.',~'' · ,~..., ~ .., : . , . ... . . .~ '. . ..'. ~. ..- .,.~, .: ...-., . '. :,, ..~.; ,.',.. :. .,. :-:~ ..... :- :.,, . -. , -~,.~.*: ,~.;.':-. ' ' ; ;.. '.. :, ~ - ::~...'/ '. ...i'... ':'?'~; ,'-"~:: .... -',.*'.r~,. (,;' : ...::.-"-'~ ~ . -..~. - ....- ,. . .· ...: ~ '..~ . ~, '. · .~. ... ~ ':..,..<,'. _*.. ~.~.., ~'.~ ..... . :.' .-¥" ..,,- -'... ~ . . '..:.-.:: : : ~.,.. ..... ~ ',. -.~,. .~'. .. ;,.. ~,-..:,~ ,... ::.-..-~: ,. :~¥. :.-.' ,...,-.'...:-- .... . ::..'. ~,. . ,... ~'-. ',:..~:.~': . :. :..,. ; ~,-' ... ,'.~.:-..'.. ,,. :.., '.;...,*.~* ~ ..':. '..-:~-- ..,,.:..' .., ..~.. ~'..* **~. -.,,~' :.,. : ~. .- - .-..o. . . : . :, :' ,': :.-/......,.~,. -,: .:' . ..~. ,.....,', ,... :.~.:,-.?-:-~ ~'. -.- · .\... ':- . - . : ,... -:: ..... ' ..... --':"~' .,-' *:".;., ":.'. '" -...~ '.~ :'; '~' ."~ :~;- -.r."'.'*' . .'.'~.., - ; . :'' '" .'' "-~..::~ '~ . - .. . ....... · .~, ':,o' ~, . ,~ - .: ~ ,'.~ ,'.. :' ~-' ... ~. · , .,,). ~. ·. , , : ; .'. .' , ': - . : ' . ... '.:.....--~.'': '..... .' .,':..!..;'~....~.:,.-...-~.. *:...- ~...~' ,., .,.-~- -..:- ., -. ..... ;::,. '.. · ,.~- ~. / , - ~.... ~, .. ,~: . ..., ~. .~ ..., , ...-. . . . ~ . :.',.:...- ' .. ~.-.,. :.. · . ~ ' -. ~,: ; ' . . - . ¥',.' .. · ,, , . · ~, ,. . ~, ,-~',; .~..- ,..~ . ,' ;... .:....~ . - .,..., ..~,~ .. ... .....o, .. .... .... . .... · , · ~ .... .;:, ,,., . ,,".,:.'.., .. ::!!:.,', .:.~.':',.,,'~,,'.'.!~ :;,..,.:: . ,~. .~:..,,..,.... :-.:..:.. :-:-:,..... ,: ,~,. ,,,~. ,, . . ,, ......~:.,'..;' . . .' ... ,. . ...... '. . .. : ... ~., .. :' ..,. :"' . .. . , .~.. , .~, . ..;. · .. -, ..~ ... - .... ·. -. -.. :- .'.- : ..~,,.:.'.''~':'.~'.~. ..."~,..,..'..~, , ,.:- -.. :......~..~:'.,,;.',,..-~,..,:;-.:.:.;_ -... ,.. ., , .~.' <. ;,:'; .~-.'~-'-' · ' .. . ',:. '. - ~" . ..':, ~--."..~ . ' ,..?."..,,-',','.,., ;.,, .... ,-.. . .'~.. ,.,. i ' : o..; . . '., · .-,: ....,: ..... ... '.,.~. -.-~. .. · -.; , :. ;_:; .... .:..-. ,,;.: ,. ',,. ', .,.,o/,,-..: :~ .,,.' '. . ,.~. '... .... .;.. ,. · , '....: .... . .. -.: .- .. :...- - , . · , ,~ .:.,'..,.. */ ..._.., ...'...,.. ~., ~>,~;' , ~ ~' ,..:.'~ '." ..... . , . .... . ..... . -. _ ..._~ ._ · '.-, .... . ._ .; ;..," ~,.-.; ~..." ,: ..:, ~, .... . ...... ,:.-.?.~' -..';. ..... . ....., .:,.:,-,-' ~.. : - ,... *~: :, ~ :... ** . . · .... .., -, ........ · ..... :r.. .... ~. · · ... ,' o." .... ; :'"t%', . ~ ' ' "~ . ' ..... ' -' '. ' ':"''. · ', ;- .'~'..,'.:~.-'., . ' .,.~ .. , ,',: .~.'~ ~. :'~' . .;, .,. .. ,.:.*'* ~. . : ' ~' ......., .'. *. ~ .. ...L ' ~, . ,. ,, ~ . . .p ,, , I.,. ~.. : . _. ,,, . ,...., ....~.: ,, ,? ~, . ~ . , .... . ~ ... ... . .. · . · ~' .*, .,.. ,_. ,,.. : ' · ', .~ *~,t ,' , · · ~... ,~ · , . . .. , , ~ ? :.. , . , , .' · . '. ::..'.,. ;:, .' ~.~ :~ '- ..-, ,.>.,. .': .',.. ,'~..':~;=:',.:; ':;..' ., :".:.',"-~ ~.~', ,. ':.....'>* ... . :. ....', ..',., · ' '' ',' . '''-' ~'': : ."- ": :-,* ... - ''.J:~;-~'"t ""'". " ',*. ~' ..; 'r"' ~:~ ' .'' ~'. '. ' 7'*: '_ "' ~,, ' *"- . . · . ~.' ''_', ..... '~,, ..... ......'.:. .' ...~.~. ,~ '. ,,-. ~ .... *.'.., · ... '. .., ' . , . ~ · .~ '. . · . '"".,'.": ' '-:~ ..~. t'..':' ;,'.,,'~': ..::~:~-:.'~ ~'~.,"..- ~,. ~.~:":.,."~ "- .;-'~ '., - .,,', .... : .- ...... ' -. .'' · '-'- "¥._' :.~-": :.,',..:".:"..'.'-".'; :.".~';-,"..':.~;,,"-',.'.'.~' '.;','~. 3~'- :-. ~...,:'..'... " ~'..~;. ,'.: -', '-..~,:::,',..~-f '. .. , ", ", "...- · . ': · .% .,..;-- -._.:~.~.,,- --, .. ;-~.,,~ .~ ~.., . ::.'., ,~. .~:'.. '.',.::~.-.;-. ,.~:.~ .-'... '~.....'... ,:.. .- .' . .. -,: ,. .~ .. .. ... ',: ....,.... : ~-- · ~' ' '..*;'; ':: .; '.: G:, "-'.~: '.. '*.'"' ' *~: .... ' :-~".'" ~ ':~' '~"'~-~'..-' ..... :'*'~' '~'." "'* ' .'-'" ' ' ''"' ' '" · .; :.', ,:;,'.'.'.":'.~'.'"'; ,, ~.,¥',., ~:.-"..',"';' '":.';~,'-'.:..; ..:' '... : ... '~' t '-.' · ':: >- ' ' .;7-:' , , . . :. :".-~ · * · '--. '. :...7 '~ .;.::'. '.'. .:';. h.: .". ". · ~ ~.. ; .: ?' ~.~.. ':.": :. .. ... ,, ,':,, ,:' ,s; _ . .,,. ,-...... .....~ ,':-::*..:..:--~.~.~:~.-,~,: ,,,, ~., '%:,;',..,. ~;,,.,: :?~.-. ::..:~i:~.,:,' :,: ??~.,:': ,<', ,... ,: '-..,. :., :,:. -.' .:..-., .,... : ~.. ',: ,:,.--..~.., - ; . · ,..-~, · . .... . ·. , · .~.,, . . ..~ .A:o ..,. ~.-a .... . .,.... ,;..: . .. - . . ,. · ' , . ._ ..,.. , ....... , . '..'-.., ~, .' .~;~:.: ,. .~:,'.-'. ': ~...;.~, ."".. · .:.. ~..~.~.,>~.~ . ,:..-..:~ -:. '~.,.'..:,'. ~ · .:..' . ....:. , :, . .. . . ,.. , . , , · . '., . , ~ ~.. ~ ~, . . , ~, , · :o.~..:~..._. .;:.-,, ~, ~).-,,.. · .. ' .~ · ~._ ~.~ , ,...,..,~._. .. · . ~,~ , . .. .... .-:' . · ., ... ~ ,. '/~ .. *: .' '- .. '¢ ..~.,:.':-.?~,::'. "~:...~ '.- *' :~'. , · · ' ~ :: &- ,.1' ~.'~. ~',.'r . -. . ·- ,, " . - ,. .~ .'. ' ~. ~ ..... ,.,..', . · . . .*, .. '... , . . ,~-:~. ,f _.* . ... ~..*.~,.,~ ,, · . ...- -. . - , . , _.,.. . -~' , .' ., -- .~ , . .-.. ..~°.. ....: ' :" . .. r~ , '~..: .., . ,~."~'_ -.. ',. ~-.-.., . , '.... ~* ~ , . . ,. ..~ .'.' : ., . . .,. :-. ~,,:, :. :., '~--.~ :'.. : '-~..; '.,~..~,,.~, ;.; o ~: ~"...' ::../.: . . ~:.~,- ...,. ,,.., . .. ~.~ :. . .' ..~:o -.:... .. ~_ · ... .· ·" , ~,' .-:..::"'.'.,'.:.~'.~,-: ... '-:.,',,',..:;':,~,..-.~".:,.:-:~ ..~::..--~ ;'.: ..~_..'::'"';..~:;;',.':'~,,, '. '-~.'.:'.,;: ~:¥:.';",i. ": :.-,.:: - '" '. .; -', · .... , .. ..,... ',.......;.....-...,..,.. . ;-:,,....,..,,,,-~,',~:~:: :~;:.~..,.... : ~.~...-, . .:"'. ..., .':,,.-,~..-...~. , ,"..'.. ...'. -.: , . o 't ..~; . :, ,.... . . . .~ ,~ ~.,~.~.....,.;,~.. ~.~: ; ...~..,... .,,. . ,,..·& ~ -~,'~' _ o.-_.., ~ . ~:.....~ , ~. , ~.~ ..... . . ... . .-.. .~ ..~. ....... ,~..,.., ,,+ ...~4.,~,.~..o + . ~ "~ , '~ ~;~. .".~ ~"/.~ ~ I."~ '' ...*.'." '' .'.,~ ~.* : ' ,...' - " · . . -' ~,., *' ,~. ',. .. -..'- · ..,.. . "...'.:'~*~;,;.~'.' j':,. ....-,-~ ,;.,. : . . .. -~'.... ..... , ..', .. ,..., ~. . .·-.. . . · .,,.:: ,.; ~ -...-.,, -.,,. :.~. ,~: :,-..¥'; ~;.(:',, ;-.~'.,'..**~; :...:.'.,,;~..:;..:..~'.~',~/~.. ,.,'. ..: , '..'.-,.., ,:,-'.,.. ,., ..' : -. ....., · .:. :._ ,.; . .~.. ,. , ...... ~.,~ ~,. , ~.~.~, .~.-~., ~..,, .~ ..~ .. ~ °?~. ~ ..~ .. -.~.- ~-.. .,.~ .~ .. ,.. : ~o. .. _. . ~,. ... . ~.:......, :..-~ , .,. :., ....... ':.'.: ..~..-.....~.-...~.~..:.' ,...,,,," ,.:;' .:o.. ,-, .;.~ ,~-:'... ? .... ~.~-.'; ..~.,' .~'?' .- . : , . *... "..:.. .... ~ ' . -,. ' '~ · - '~* ~ ~" · '.,' *, ~. ' ..... '~r ' · · ~ a.-' : ·'. "~ ~ ° ~: . ~ .-' · . '" .:. . ' · · ' ' · " e." :: .* ~''*. ':( ~,."-, . · ';. - . ~-. '":.,~.~,~': ;. *"'~.-'.:,~ , ''?';"~"~ ~ ~'~'-'*. .~""" : .... ' '4 ' . ' ' ''' - . . . -.;~,. . :.: - _ -~ .. . . :..*. ..<.... ~- .. ,.. ~. .~ . . .. *~,.. o,.~., - . ~.. . '.., ~ ~ .,... ~.~': ..' ~.-... '. . . . . . ,., . ,: . ,·~,.-'. ':.-. :~;.:. _' ,..:, :~,-.>! ...,.~.',~..;-.~,.:.,.;,,..., '~...~' .,....£..,~.'.'.>.,, .~;.::'.? ..,-; ,.. ...,:..',,:.., .,......-.... .. · . ... ;...: .... ~.. .~ : ' . ,:* .~,..' ..- ,",.~: .-*-' ..>"3"' .,..:..'.? "~' ' :.~., *.. ' '. .'.' . .'.',,,. ~- ' , .' ' , · , 'r' . -- ':;'; '* '. ,. '~ :' :'.~" ' "'* ' ~','.,.~ ";.' °"'.;.- ':*; "': ~-." ;.';-" ,":: *.~' ,: ' ' ' ''-' :', '~ '-.. ' '~ " * ' ' '~ - · . . ::. ..,,.- .. ,_. ....~.: .'.~..... :.'~,',;? _%.?" ;." ;~:.~:..;~<. ..,, ':; . - : .. .:':,: ..... ....':...:.: - Primazy Standards - Mandatory Heal'h-Related Stan~ Established by the State o: Cali~orni~ Department of ]lealth services j PARA~E/~ I UNITS J OD~ ! RANGE ' J ! ! T~V~. ~ N~J I 0.5 I o,~o - 0.4'0 I O, IT I I SURFACE WATER I CZA~TY I Turbi~ty I I ~ZC~OBmOLO~IC~L I Coliform Bacteria I ORSANIC c~n~cnr.~ I Total TrJJ~alcm~thanes I ~d:in I Methcxychlor I Toxaphene 12,4-D 1 2,4,5-TP Silvex I Atrazine I Ben~azon I ~enzene I Carbon Tetr~chloride J 1,2-Dibrc~o-3-c2%lor~prc~Dane J l, 4-Dichlorc~enzene l 1,2-Dichlorc~thane I 1,1-Dic-hloroethylene 1,3-Dichlo~~e thylbenzene i ~?chylene Dibromide JMolinate I [~n~orobenzene ISimazine J 1,1,2,2-Tetr~ckloroethane ~ Te trach/oroethyl e_ne J 1,1,1-Trichloroethane I 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ~ Trichloroethylene I Vinyl Ckloride J Xylenes J Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene J Tr~ns-1,2-Dichlorc~thylene ~ 1,1-Dic-hloroethane J 1,2-Dich/oropropane J Trichlorofluo~thane I (Freon ii) J 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2- J Trifluoroethane (Freon I ca:bo~-~n ~ Glyphosate I ~/or~ne I % Tests I 10 Positive I I ~/1 '1 0.i0 ~/i I o. ooo2 m~/1 I o. oo4 ~/1 I ~/~ I o. oo5 ~/~ I m~/~ I o.ol rog/1 I o. 003 m~/1 I o. o18 m~/1 I o. ooi m~/1 I 0.0005 7/1 I o. 0002 m~/z I o. oo5 7/1 I 0.0005 ~/i. I o. 006 m~/1 I o. ooo5 ~/i I o. 68o ma/1 I 0.00002 ~/i I o. 02 ~/i I o. 030 m~/1 I o. oi zn~/1 I o. ooi m~/1 I o. oo5 z~/i I o. 07 ~/i I o.~o0 ~/i I o. 032 ~=j/1 I o. 005 m~/1 I o. ooo5 ~/i I i.750 ~g/1 I o. 006 ~/i I o. oi ~/i I o.oo5 ~./1 I o. 005 ~/i I o.~5 I ~j/i I i.2 I m://1 I o.ois ~/1 I o. ? m~/1 I 0.0001 AVERAGE I I I For m~mb~e filter: I Units~ Colonies pe~ 1oo ml I t.~cz., = i I ] t,~o,,,( ~,.c'r'r~.~ - ] O. I ? '/9 I~ o.ooooz- <ol. ooo ~ 1<o.ooo7-- <ol. oo~ I< o.oo~- <~.o~1 I< c). ooos - <o. ods' I~,o.oo~ - <o.o~1 I <o.oo~ I I~o.,,e .~ ~-'r-~ c.-,-~, c, J<o.oo0s I~ar ~c =~ ~o~1 I < ! I I I INo.~ ~e~c~o- I<o. oos I <o.oooo~ I -4- i PARA~-TER ] ~ MAX~ ~ SURFACE WATER ~ UNITS ~ OONTOLMINANT ~ RANGE ~ AVERAGE krsenic I m:3/1 I 1. I ~o ,oz.-<o, I I I ma/1 I 0.05 I < o. o, - <o.ogl ~ariu~ I ma/1 I ~. I < o, ~ - < ,. o I I~~~' I ~/~ I o. o~o I < o. ~o, - < ~. o~ I I~~ I ~/1 I o.om I<o.o, - <o.os I IFluoride I ~/1 I1.4 - 2.4* I O, O~ - <0, Z I INi~~ (~ No3) I ~/1 I 45. I<o.o~ - ~,z I IS~v~ I ~1 I o.o5 I<o.o,. I I I I I I~zo~ I 1 I I I~iti~ I ~1 I ~o,ooo I ~. o I I S~nti~-9o I ~i/1 I a I ~. o I I~~ 226 & 228 ~~g I ~i/1 I 5 I ,, o I lU~~ I ~~ I ~o I <~ o I i I j ' I I Secondary Standards - Aesthetic Standards Establlshed By the ~tate of Ca/ifornia, Depar~nen of Rea/th Sezvice~ ! I Coior I units I 3.5 I <, - <. t I I Odor-Threshold I Units I C~2oride I m~/1 I I~ I m:~/3. I I I..r~n ISulf,,,te I z~/'~ I I Zine =. I ,,'~/~ I · I ~,~/3. I s.o 1 m~/1 - milligrmms per lit~_r (parts per million) pCi/1 -pico Curies per liter * ~ Maximum Contaminant Level - has not yet been ad~. * Fluoride S~ depends on tempermture. N.D. - None Detected In addition to the above cx~stituents, we have ~cted monitoring for 4~ additional or, afdc chemicals for which the California DeparJnrent of Health Services amd US~A have not yet set a star~ard and all results were below detection levels unless otherwise noted. For add/tional water quality data contact Keith Tiema,n at 48§-0679. ** Methylene Chloride --MEASURED LEVEL _DETECTION LEVEL O. 00085 mg/1 0. 00050 mg/1 =' ualCium (Ca) mg/L Hagneeium (Hg) ~mg/L Sodium (NA) mg/L Potassium ' mg/L Total Alkalinity . / "~=oXide (OH) CO3, mg/L Carbonate (CO3) mg/L Bicarbonate (HCO3) * mg/L, Sulfate (SO4) . .... * . mg/L, Chloride (C1) .... 45 ', mg/L Nitrate (as NO3) mg/L Fluoride (F) Temp. Depend. Total Anions Heq/L Value: umho/cm** Specific Conductance (E C.) o. · e** mg/L*** Total Filterable Residue at 180C (TDS) Units APParent Color (Unfiltered) TON Odor Threshold at 60 C NTU Lab Turbidity 0.5 mg/L NBAS ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. . 860 WAU=H LN. "' UKIAH, CA 95482 GENERAL HINERAL & PHYSICAL, & INORGANIc ANALYsIs (8/93) Date of Report= 03/22/94 Laboratory Sample ZD No-9403070801 NameI'ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABS Signature Lab /'--~ Date/Time Sample J =¥=aeuwood Va11~ =~ -............. @ Lab= 94/03/07/1~= _ n~lyses S¥.t.m '-''''''''''''''''''''''''':~-~ NameI.REDWOOD V~LLF, y_~0 *******e********~, Number= 2310008 ' User ID~ J%Xa Sample= Station Number~ C23/008-~ENDLK! , ~ Laboratory Code= ~6~0 * Submitted by= * ****************~ Phone #= *-*******.****~;,*** i 004~0 71830 00445 00440 00945 00940 71850 0095~ 64 ND 78 17 7.0 0.5 O.1 00403 00095 70300 00081 00086 7.2 141 ?1 2 82079 0.20 250-500-606- ** o~ .... 38260 ND ~uO ~600 2200 *** ~-~u0-2200- *** $00-1000-1500 **** · . _'--- ' - - · ~.4-2.4 INORGANIC CHEMICALS CONSTITUENT · iii . ' .~!.' t . . ~ · ~000 u~/L . ' ' '~'50~'~'ug/L ~ngan..e (~n) r:~,~'.~2~ ~'ug/L . ~e~cu=7 (fig) · **** ~0 ua/L/.... ~000 ug/L Zinc Aluminum (Al) Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Total Ct) Copper (Cu) 9403070801 RESULTS 01105 01002 01007 01027 01034 01042 01045 01051 01055 71900 01147 01077 01092 100 50.0 ND 5.0 75 100.0 ND 1.0 ND 10.0 ND 50.0 ND 100.0 ND 5.0 ND 30.0 ND 1.0 ND 5.0 ND 10.0 450 50.0 · i NTU ADDITIONAL ANALYSES Field Turbidity 82078 C Source Temperature C Langelier Index Source Temp. Langelier Index at 60 C Std. Units Field PM Agreeeiveness Index Silica Phosphate Iodide Sodium Absorption Ratio. Asbestos Boron Nitrate as Nitrogen(N) Nitrate + Nitrite as Nitrogen(N) Nitrite as Nitrogen(N) Beryllium Thallium · Nickel · Antimony Cyanide Ammonia Lithium Bromide Bromate 00010 71814 71813 00400 82383 00955 00650 71865 00931 81855 01020 00618 A-029 00620 01012 01059 01067 01097 01291 00612 01132 82298 A-027 ***** New or revised NCL pending 0.20 400 400 400 1.0 1.0 10.0 6.0 100.0 i ' ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 860 WAUGH LN. · UKIAH, CA 95482 Date of Reports 03/22/94ORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSIS (8/93) Laboratory Sample ID No.9403070801 Names ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABS Director: Name of Sampler~Client Employed BysRedwood Valley CWD Date/TAme Sample Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Collected~ 94/03/07/1010 Received @ Lab: 94/03/07/1045 Completed: 94/03/18 System ' Name~ REDWOOD VALLEY CWD System ' Numbers 2310008 Name or Number of Sample Source~ PUMP STATION CAISSON ******************************************************************************** * Ua ~D~ RXR Station Number: C23/O08-MENDLKI . ' ?'D&~e/Tlme of Samples194lo 1o7lloloI LaboratoryCod., YY MM DD TTTT * : . ' Date Analysis Completed, I' 1o 1 ,1 · YY MM DD * * Submitted by: Phone ~: * PAGE 1 OF 3 REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS O CONSTITUENT NSTITUENTS REPORTED ug/L Bromodichlo~omethane Bromoform · ~. .. ~ .' Chloroform (Trichloromethane) Dlbromochloromethane :" Total Trihalomethanee (THM'S/ TTHM) Benzene . Carbon Tetrachloride '," Ethyl Benzene :. . 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene (p-DCB} 1,1-Dichloroethane (1,/-DCA} · 1,2-Dlchloroethane (1,2-DCA} :..~ .'.:.. :: .,: i~i:.'..;. ~,l-Dlchloroethylene (1,1-DCE) ' ' %~' '" cis-l,2-Dlchloroethylene (c_1, :'z:' : 2-DCE) .', ":'~ ;' trane-l, 2-Dlchloroethylene (t-I,2-DCE) .. .~.. · 1,2-Dlchloropropane Total 1,3-Dlchloropropene , ~onochlorobenzene (Chlorobenzene) ' . .~... 1,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ~" ~... Tetrachloroethylene (PCE} ~ 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA} '.! .. :. l,l,2-Trichloroethane (1,1,2-TCA) · .%~. Trichloroethylene (TCE) Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) Trlchlorotrifluoroethane (FREON 113} Vinyl Chloride (VC) m,p-Xylene o-Xylene Total Xylenes (m,p, & o) NeE Del No.000000 32101 32~04 32106 32105 82080 ND [ 0.5 _ 301 0.5 ND_ [ O. 5 35 [ 100 0.5 34030 32102 34371 34571 34496 34531 34501 77093 34546 34541 34561 34301 34516 34475 34506 34511 39180 34488 81611 39175 A-014 77135 81551 I 0.5 · 5 0.5 · *680 5.0 5 0.5 S 0.5 .5 0.5 · * 6 0.5 6 0.5 10 0.5 5 0.5 .5 0.5 · * 30 1.0 1 0.5 5 0.5 200 1.0 32 1.0 5 0.5 150 5.0 1200 10.0 .5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2750 '10.0 3 MET,HOD I ALL CONS~T~UEN~S REPORTED ug/L ' . .....' D£bromochloropropane (DBCP) 38761 · Ethylene Dlbromide (EDB) · Endrin Llndane (gamma-BHC) Methoxychlor Toxaphene · ~ Chlordane .. %...Dleth~lhexylphthal&te (DEHP) m.;:,~ . Heptachlor · :!:~;2.' 'Neptachlor epoxide ~ .. Slmazine (PRINCEP) ". .. Thiobencarb (BOLERO) Bentazon (BASAGRAN) · , 2,4-D : . :: ... '2,4,5-TP (SILVEX) ~.. ~ Carbofuran (~URADAN) ::.l ' ......' · ..,...'.';.'.'.::' . Glyphoeate .. _ ' '": UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS NUED 9403070801 ENTRYJANALYSES RESULTS 77651 39390 39340 39480 39400 39350 39~00 39410 39420 39O33 82199 39055 A-001 38710 39730 39045 81405 79743 MCL · ug/L J DLR · 02 0.02 · * .2 0.10 · * 4 0.20 · *100 lO.O · * 5 1.0 · 1 0.1 4 3.0 .01 0.01 · 01 0.01 3 1.0 20 2.0 · * 10 1.0 70 1.0 18 2.0 · *100 10.0 · * 10 1.0 18 5.0 700 25.0 8romobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene · Chloroethane 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride) 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dlbromomethane 1,2-Dlchlorobenzene (o-DCB) 'l,3-Dlchlorobenzene (m-DCB) Dlchlorodifluoromethane Dlchloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane 2,2-Dlchloropropane 1,1-Dichloropropene Hexachlorobutadiene Iaopropylbenzene (Cumene) P-Isopropyltoluene Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene l,l,l,2-Tetrach~or~ethane Toluene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 81555 A-O12 34413 A-OIO 77350 77353 34311 34576 34418 A-008 A-009 77596 34536 34566 34668 34423 77173 77170 77168 34391 77223 A-01! 34696 77224 77128 77562 34010 77613 34551 77443 77222 77226 O.S 0.$ 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 O.S 0.5 1.0 3.0 0.5 0.5 0.$ O.S 0.5 0.5 O.S O.S 0.5 0.5 10.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 '0.5 F3 ALL CONSTITUENTS REPORTED ug/L UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEHICALS CONTINUED 9403070801 RESULTSJ Methyl ethyl ketone (HEK, But&none} 81595 Methyl lsobutyl ketone (HIBK) bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether 81596 34273 Alachlor (ALANEX} 77825 Aldicarb (TEMIK) · Aldicarb Sulfone Aldicarb Sulfoxide Aldrin Benzo(a)pyrene Bromacil (HYVAR} Butachlor Carbaryl (Sevin) Chlorothalonil (DACONIL, BRAVO} Dalapon Diszinon Dlcamba (BANVEL} Dieldrin Dlmethoate (CYGON) Dlnoseb (DNBP) Dlquat Dl(2-ethylhexyl} adipate Dluron Endothall Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorocyclopent&diene 3-Hydroxycarbofuran Methomyl Metolachlor Oxamyl (Vydate) Pentachlorophenol (PCP} Plcloram Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Total PCB's} Prometryn (CAPAROL) Propachlor 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dloxin} 39053 A-020 A-019 39330 34247 82198 77860 77700 7O314 38432 39570 82052 3938O 38458 81287 78885 A-026 39650 38926 39700 34386 A-021 39051 39356 38865 39032 39720 39516 39057 38533 34676 5.0 5.0 ** 1.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 0.075 ** 0.1 10.0 0.38 5.0 5.0 ** 10.0 0.25 0.0B1 0.02 10.0 ** 2.0 ** 4.0 ** 5.0 1.0 ** 45.0 ** 0.5 ** 1.0 3.0 2.0 ** 20.0 ** 0.2 ** 1.0 ** 0.5 2.0 0.5 ** 5E-6 ** New or revised MCL pending m i I ."1 e I I Mi~.X22.~.,'M i SURFACE WATER PARA~~ ~ UNITS ~ ODNTAMINANT ~ RANGE I AVERAGE I Turbictity I ~rm I 0.5 I o, I I I I I M/CROBIOIDGI~ I I I I coliform Bacteria I % Tests I 10 I For m~mbrane filter: I Positive I I IORSm~C cma~c~r.q I I I HC~- i I ITotal Trinalomethanes I ~/1 I 0.10 I~o~= =~c~o- 10.~?~9 I~-in I win/1 I O.OOO2 I< o.ooooz- <ol.o o o u'~-~'.~: I ~/1 I 0.004 I< o.ooo Z - < ol. oo~ II~atncxychlor I rog/1 I 0.1 I< o.oo~ - <=.o~l IToxaphene I ~/1 I O.OO5 I< 12,4-D I ~/~ ! 0.1 I<o.oo, - ~.o~1 =, 4,5-TP Silwx I m~/1 I 0.01 I < o. o o t I I Atrazine I m~/1 I 0.003 I~o,~ = ~c~m I IBentazon I rog/1 I 0.0~8 I~ ~-~o ~1 I Benzene I rog/1 I 0.001 I,o~ m~c~m J<o.ooos I Carbon Tetrachloride I m=~/1 I 0.0005 1,2-Dibrcarc~3-chlo~~e [ ;rc3/1 I O. 0002 ! 1,4-DiVorce I ~/1 [ 0.005 I 1,2-Dia~om~e I W/1 I 0.0005 I 1,1-Di~o~~yl~e I ~/1 I 0.006 INo~ ~~- ', 3-DiVorce ~ ~1 ~ 0.0005 .-~y~~e I ~/1 I 0.680 ~ ~yl~e D~~de ~ ~/1 ~ 0.00002 ~Mol~te ~ ~/1 J 0.02 I~n~o~~e : I ~/1 I 0.030 I~o~ o~,~,~o - 14o.oo~ [S~z~e [ ~1 [ 0.01 [NON~ ~e~o I I Te~~o~~yl~e I ~/1 [ 0.005 I~~~ I ~/1 i o.07 I~o~ ~e ~ ~"~1 Ii,l,l~i~o~~e I ~1 I 0.200 I~-~ mt~o-I~o, ool [ 1,1, 2~i~o=~e [ ~1 [ 0.032 I~ ~, ~,,a- 1~o. oo ~ I ~i~o~~yl~e I ~/1 I 0.oo5 I~o-~ IV~yl ~oride I ~/1 I 0.0005 I Cis-1,2-Di~o~~yl~e I ~1 I 0.006 * I~o-~ I ~-1,2-Di~o~~yl~e I ~/1 I 0.01 * 1, 1-DiVorCe [ ~1 ] 0.005 * [No~ o[~[~. ~<o. oooS [~i~o~fluo~~e [ ~1 [ 0.~ * [No-[ ~,_--%:--.c-[<o.oo~ (~n ~) I I I I [1,1,2~i~o~1,2,2- ~ ~ I 1.2 * [No.= .=~=r~.-I<o.oo~ . [~ifluo~~e (~n 1~) ~ ~ IG~o~te I ~/1 I I~=~c =~~ I I~o~e I ~/t I I <o.oooo= I lHe~~or I ~/1 I I<o.o~o, ~ liep~~or e~de I ~/1 I 3i 2-e~ h ~ h~alate N.D. - None Detected 0.018 * 0.7 * · 0.0001 * 0.00001 * 0.00001. * I<b..o~al-~o.c~ll · 004 * . cr~ SURFACE WATER RANGE ~ AVERAGE I IAl~ I I~um I I Fluoride I Lead ~ ~Nitrate (as N03) I I selenium I ISilver I I I RRDIOA~-A'zYA'AY I IGross Alpha Activity I Gross BeUa Activity I I Triti%~ I i Stronti~-90 ~ ~RadzLL~n 226 & 228 ccmgmined I lUranium I I I .... I I I I I ,,w/1 I 1. I ~o.oz.-,<o. ~ I m:3/1 I 0.05 I < o.o, -<o,ogl ~/1 I 1. I <o, ~ - <~.o I ~/1 I 0.010 I~.oo,- <o.o~ I ~/1 I 0.05 I<o.o, - <o,o~l ~/1 I 1.4 - 2.4 * I O,O8 - <O,Z i ~1 I o.o5 I<o,oos ~1 I 0.002 I<o. ooos -<o.oozl ~/~ I 45. I<o:o,- I,~ I ~/~ I o.o~ ~/1 I 0.05 I<o.o~ - <0,o~ I I I I I I I ~i/1 I ~5 I o - < z. o I ~i/1 I 50 I~ ~c,~ ~o~1 ~i/l I ao, ooo I ~. o I ~i/l I 8 I 2. o I ~i/1 I 5 I ,, o I ~i/l I ~o I < 2. o I ! I ! Secondary Standards - ;~-sthetic Stan~w_~ Established By the ~ta~e of C~lifornia, Depar~ of Health Services I I I 1 IColor I ur~t.s I 1~ I ~, - c. 5 I I~oride I ~/1 I 500 I I .~- I Z I G .~ I~ I ~/~ I z.o I <o.o,-o.~: I I~~~~ (~) I ~/~ ' I o.5 I <o.oz-<o.,o ! I~n ' I ~/~ I 0.3 I <o.os - o., I I~~' I ~/~ I o o5 I <~ o,-z o I z~a ~ I ~/~ I s.o I<o.o,- o.~ I li I ~/~ I soo I ~5- 5o I zo I ~~Llooo ~ z s J % ~. ~ L I I I I I I~=s (~co3) I (~) I " I = ~ - %e I IS~= I (~/L) I " I ~.n -~. s I ~.S I~ci= I (~) I " I ~-z5 I '~ ~ I~=i= I (~/~) I " ' m~/1 - milligrams per liter (parts per pCi/1 -pico Curies per liter * ~ Maximum Contaminant Level - has not yet been ack,feed. * Fluoride Star~ard deDends on temperature. N.D. - None Detected In addition to the above oor~tituents, we have ~ mmxitoring for 4~ add/tiona] organic chemicals for which the California Department of Health Service~ ~ USEPA have not yet set a standard ar~ all results were below detection levels unless otherwise noted. For additional water quality data contact Keith Tlemann at 485-0679. ** Methylene Chloride MEASURED LEVEL __DETECTION LEVEL 0.00085 mE/1 0.00050 mE/1 --5-- ALPHA ANALYTICAL LADORATORIES, INC. 860 WAUGH LANE UKIAH, CA 95482 EDT GENERAL HINERAL & PHYSICAL, & INORGANIC ANALYSIS (4/95) Date of Report, 04/10/95 Sample ID No.95-0322-15-1 Laboratory Signature Lab ~~ Name, ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. Director, /~tt~--/' Name of Sampler,Client Employed By,Redwood Valley CWD Date/Time Sample Date/Time Sample Date Analyses Collectedl 95/03/22/1310 Received @ Lab, 95/03/22/1338 Completedl 95/04/05 System System Name, REDWOOD VALL~Y~b · ~ Number, 2310008 Name ~ ~umber or,Sample Source, PUHP STATION CAISSON~ ~ U~___~ Station Number~ C23/008-HENDLKI * ' ~ Sample, 1951031221~31~1~0~ Laboratory Cod., 1610 · ~ ' YY HM DD TTTT ..~ YY HH DD * Phone ~ .  .CHEMICAL ~ mg/L Total Hardness (as CaCO3} 00900 mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L [ Total Cations Calcium (Ca) Hagnesium Sodium (NA) Potassium ~eg/L Value, z.4 ] 00916 00927 00929 00937 mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L+ mg/L+ mg/L mg/L Total Anlo,,s Total Alkalinity (AS CaCO3} Hydroxide {OH) Carbonate (CO3} Bicarbonate (HCO3} Sulfate (SO4) Chloride (el) Nitrate (as NO3) Fluoride (F) Temp. Depend. Heq/L Value, 1.4 J Std. Units+ PH (Laboratory) *** umho/cm+ Specific Conductance (E C.} 0.5 mg/L+ Units TON NTU mg/L+ Total Filterable Residue at 180C (TDS) Apparent Color (Unfiltered} Odor Threshold at 60 C Lab Turbidity ~BAS 00410 71830 00445 00440 00945 00940 71850 00951 00403 00095 70300 00081 00086 82079 38260 14 6.3 4.7 1.11 61 ND ND 74 7.8 ND 1.1 ND 8.2 127 81 15 10 8.6 ND ----~250-500-600 1.4-2.4 900-1600-2200 500-1000-1500 0.5 2.0 0.1 ALP[IA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 860 WAUCH LANE UKIAH, CA 95482 EDT Date of Report: 04/10/95ORcANIc CHEHICAL ANALYsis (4/95) Laboratory Sample ID flo.95-0322-15-! Name: NORTH COAST LABS Signature Lab Nam. of Sampl-r:Client , . Dlr.¢tor,_~J,A~.~ mpioyed BytRe~ Date/TAme Sample Date/TAme Sample Collectedl 95/03/22/~3~0 Rec ' - - . Date Anal -........................._' e~ve~ ~ Lab~ 95/03/22/133a .... ~ ~" _ System . ' ..... """ ...... ----..... _L_ ' ~umpiece~ 95/03/30 Name: ~DWOOD V~LEY CWD System ' Numbec~ 2310008 N~e or Number of Sample Source= PU~P STATION CAISSON ******************************************************************************** * na~e/r~, o~ Sampl., [9sl03[22113~0j sca:ton .umber, C23/00e-.~ND~KZ . * ~ ~ DD TTTT Laboratory Code= 3334 * YY * Submitted bT: Date Analysis Completed,I"io 1 ol· ~ Phone 1: ~AG~ 1 OF 1 ~ULATED O~CANIC C~E~ICAL~ ~eg Del No,000000 HCHEMICAL ~ E~ICAL~ REPORTED ug/L 507 Simazine (PRINCEp) 39033 39055 ~~ I 4 1.0 UNITS CHEHICAL 1000 ug/L Alum£num (Al) 6 ug/L 50 ug/L 1000 vg/L 4 ug/L $ - =g;L · $0 100o 300 50 2 ~00 50 100 2 SO00 Antimony Arsenic (As) Barium (Ba) Beryllium Cadmium (Cd) ug/L Chromium (Total Ct) ug/L+ Copper (Cu) ug/L+ Iron ug/L .Lead ug/L+ Hanganese ug/L Hercu=y (Hg) ug/L Nickel ug/L Selenium (Se} ug/L+ Silver (Ag} ug/L Thallium ug/L Zinc 95-0322-15-1 IENTRY I ANALYSES ' { RESULTS{ DLR{ .. 01105 01097 01002 01007 01012 01027 01034 01042 01045 01051 01055 71900 01067 01147 01077 01059 01092 ND 50.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 150 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.0 2.0 100.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 50.0 100.0 5.0 30.0 1.0 10.0 5.0 10.O 1.0 50.0 ADDITIONAL ANALYSES Agressiveness Index 82383 ~----~.5{ + Indicates Secondary Drinking Water Standards 2310009 Monitoring Requirement~. Redwood Valley CWD - Pump Station Caluon ,. Standard Source Monitoring Schedules Surface Water- CLSA Al~l~m 1~0 MCL , 12 M~ 1994 Ma~h . i Amimonv 8 M~ 12 March 1 60 ' MCL 12 Mmch 1994 Mamh 1996 ~.n~ ~dum , 1~ M~ 12 Ma;ch 1~4 M~e~ 1995 B~ll;um .... 4 ' MCL ' 12 ' ' ' MI;ch Cadm'~m 5 MCL 12 ~ 19~ MM~ 1995 ' ' 60 M~ 12 ~;~ 19~' Mm~ 1895 C~tum , ~a~de 2~ MCL Wa~ - ' 2 M~ 12 ~-~ 10~ ~ 19~ ~c~l ,, , ~l~n~ , EO MCL 12 ~c~ 1~ Mw~ 1~96 RuoHde 1.4~s) MCL 12 M~ch 1, 994 March 1995_ ~"~',~'~ ........... ~ ......................... Dec' 1995 ~be~ot 7 MFL MCL 108 N~r~i (NO3)~ ~ 50~ of McL , 3 , M~h 1994 ~, ~.~ Nk~e IN) .... 1 50~ of MCk ~ . Dec. 1999 ~iuml~m 2~ 12 M~h ~4 March ~o~ 16 Un~e , 1~ Msr~ 1994 Mer~ 1996 ' 1~ 12 March 1994 M~ch Coppm ,, Co.~l~y (Aggre~ index) ,. ~~e .... 12 . March 1996 Fo~i~ Age~e ' , 6~ 12 March 1994 ~n ' ' 300 .... 12 Mar~ 1994 March 1995 ........ 60 ' 12 M~h 1994 M~ch Mlng~e Od~ ' ' 3 TON 12 Meca% 1994 Mar~ 1995 ' 1~ 12 M~h 19~ March 1995 $a~r , . ' T~~ , 5 ~ . 12 M~.~. 1994 Marc~ ~1~:1~i MCL 12 Ma~% 1~4 M~ch 1995 S~e;~c ~n~;~ce " 9~1~; M~ 12 ~m~c~ 1~4 Mar~ !996, ~ ~iom C~dde , ' ' ~6~6~ MCL 12 ~ 1 ~ Mef~ Su~ate ..... 25~5~600 M~ 12 Mif~ 19~ Me;~ 1~95 ' 6.~.5 MCL '"12 ~r~ lg~ W;~ 1995 ~H , . , ~~,te ..... ' ' ' 12 M~% 1~9~ u,.==.,- 1996 ~ ~ ~ ~-- 12 Mgch 1994 March 1996 Alkali ~~~ 12 M~ch1994 ~ar~1995 CIl~m , ~ ~ ~~ ~ M~h 1994 ~h ~~ --~~ ~ 1~ M~ch 1994 Mwch 1996 ugh: micro grema I)M I~r; nt~L.: mliill~nl pl~ ~ ~1~ ~~ W ~ TON: ~e~ ~ N~r . ~ A~ one year ~ qu~ ~~ f~ ~M. ~ ~~ f~~ ~w ~ ~ ~mpb ~ ~. , Page I of ~ Pump Itmtion ~mb,on $ourm ~ Sehe~u~ SN 231~008 · ' i,;rteml~si · ~ MGL ~t ]~uQCIBI ~.OUiJ~Y ~T ~T DA I · I 8~e~ ' 1 ' O~CT ~ JU~v 1993 Ju~y 1999 C~n Tetf~lde 0.6 D'~ECT ',, 72 July 1993 Ju~ 1 gg9 1,2-DI~o~e~ 600 0~ 7~ Ju~ ~gg3 Ju~ 1999_ ~,~ic~oro~e~ ..... 5 D~E~ ,72 July 1993 ~u~ 1 1. l-Dichloro~h~ 5 D~E~ 72 July 1~3 July 1999 i~2-DIc~oroe~.~ ' 0.8 D~ ' 72, July 1~3 July 1989_ 1 ~i .Oi~o~o'e~ ,. 6 ' D~i~ 72 Ju~ 1993 July 1998 c~-1,2-D~lor~h~ " ~ .... D~iCT ' 72 July 1~ July,1999 _ ~.~l.2.Oi~0roet~line 10 DET~ 72 Ju~ 19;3 Ju~ 1999 O~h~r~ha~ ' 5 Ot;~ 72 Ju~ 1993 Ju~ 1~9 ~1,2.Oi~pc~.~ 5 D~E~ 72 Ju~ 1983 Ju~ ~,~Oio~o~o~ . . 0.6 ' D~E~.. ?2" ~ 1983 ~u~ 1999 'E~~ .. 7~ ~,ecl 72 ~ly 1993 Ju~ ;~hlom~ene ' 70 ~ 7Z July 1993 ~ly 1999~ $w~ne ~, ' 1~ .... DE~ 72_ Jdy 1993 ~ 1999 %l,Z,Z-~rachlomot~m' '~ 1 DETECT 12 July 1993 J~y 1999 5 ~E~ 72 J~y 1~93 J~y 1999 ~e~, Noroethylene ... .. To~en~ 150 D~E~ , 7~ ,, J~Y 1~93 J~y 1969 _ 1.2,~Tdchtor~ben~ . 70 O~CT 72 J~y t 993 .. J~y 1999 1.1,1 .T~chlO~t~ne ..... '~00 D~ 7Z July 1993 J~y 1999 ~.~.2-T~lot~T~g~ E D=~CT 7~ J~y 1993 Ju~ 1999 Trlchtomet~l~e 6 ' D=i tCT 72 Ju~ 1993 Juty 1 T~chio~ofluo~~ "' 150 .... D~C~ , , 72 July 1'993 Jul~ 1999 ~. 1.2-~t~r~l .~-THflu~ha~ '" 12~ D~CT 72 July 1993 July 1 V~yI ~l~e '0..~ O~CT . 72 Ju~ 1993' Ju~ 1999_ X~le~; (total) .... '~750 D~ECT ,72, July 1993 July 1999 Ala~l~ 525 2 DET~ W~lw~ Mt~ch 1983 A=~ni ~7 3 0~'~ 3~ , April 1~0 "M~oh Be~oial~ 0-2 D~ I tCT W~d ~r=n 631.1 18 '" DirECT 3~ ' M=~h 1993 M~rch 1996 C~dane 50~ 0.1 DE~ ~ W~d ~b. ~;~D ..... ~,1,5 .... ?0 D~ ~-~CT o,~e ~b. 1993 Complet~ _ D~l.pon 515.1 2~, D~ 36 - ~c. !,995 Dl{2~~yl)~e (DEH~ 525.1 4 ~ W.~ ~W 1989 ~,,b " . .... el'e.~ 7 ..~CT .... ... 3e " - Oec. 1996- Dl=uat - ~ , 2~ ,DE~E~ 36 - Dec. Endot~al~ ' 648 1~ O~ 96 . 0~, 1995 E~n ' ~15~ 2 ..... D~E~ W=ived ~b. 1993] Et~e~ Di~m~ (EDB} 6~ ,,O'06 D~E~ "~ ~=e -' ~rch 1993 , Olypho~e 547 7~ O=i~ Wa~ JuW 1989 Hepta~hlor 8~/50'8 0.01 D~i~ , ~ ~b. 1893 ~mp~m ~ch~r E~e ' " 5~/~08 ~.01 D=~CT . ~ ~. 1993 H~orobe~ene , I Ot ~,~ We~ , - U~ane .... 505/508 0.02 D~CT o~ Feb. 1~3 Me~Xy~. . ~08 ~ D~ Q~= ~b. 1993 ~ll~te '" ~7 ' 20 "" Ot i~ Wl~d - " sJ~.~ z~ O~ .... 3s . D.c. ox.m~ ,, , ,, ' ~'a~lo~phonol (PC~ ~ 15.1 1 DE~'~ 36 , - Doc. 1996 P~Mom 51~.1 EO0 D~E~ , 36 ,,, · Oeo. 1 Polychl~l~ted.. ~n~l (KB) S~ O.S O~E~ W~ - SimaZlne ' ~0~ ~' O~Ti~ 3~ ~ii 1~90 Ma~h 1~95 Thto~nc~ ~07 . 70 D~E~ W~ - To=.ph.~ ' SO~Oe ' 3 " D~ '"onci .. r~. leS3 c~ _ 2,3.7,8.TCDD (Olo~n) , 013 O.~3 D~ECT Welv~ - 2~4,5-TP (Si~x) ~,,, ~,,, ,~I~ ' ~0 ~E~ , ~, ~b. 1993 Piee 2 of 9 MMdl le9S . o SN 2310008 ~_.~..nn,.c.~...~~_-mc~8~.%e.,~;~;.~-:;:::_-_:~-~.. 602.2/624.21 ~CL .... ~iOg~q ~n-~Cy L&~ T~ DA~ ~" aromob~ .... O~ Ju~ t ~83 Brom~t~~e. ~HM) . ~ July 1 ~3 Bromo~rm (THM) ~ Ju~ 1993 ~m~lote Brom~mi~ene ' ' ' ~ Ju~ 1993 Chlomdlbmm~;h~ {THM) " O~ July 1993 ~hl°r°lth~ ' .~I July 1993 Cblorof~ (THM) , . .. ~ July ,t993 ~l~e " Chlordane ~ ~!Y 1993 2-Chlorotol~ "' , ,, ~ ..... Ju~ 1993 ~J~e ~Chl~ro,t~luo~ ..... o~ July 1993 Dibm~th~ ..... ....... O~ ~Jy 1993 ~l~e 1,3~ic~r0~e~ Q~ ~ 19~3 ,, ~e DI~~uo~T~M ..... ~ ~ly J 993 ~lete 1,3~;~orop~pe~ ,,, ~ July 1993 1,2,~brop ~ ~ July 1~S3 Bromo~o~i . 602.~E24.~ =W ' j~y 19e3 ~m~=il ,~O7 ..... ~ · Dec. ;Mc-B~I~a~ 502~ JUly 1~93" ' ~oroth~nff E05/508 " O~e -' De;. '~iuinun ...... 5~7 ~ - O'~. ~ D~et~oto S07 ~ - Doc. 1995 ~u~n 632 ' ' ' ; ,.. M - Dot. 1995 He~ch~mbuc~J~e 602.2 ~uiy 1993 ' ...... ~.,~ , W~PmpY~ 502.~24.2 ~ ~ 1993 ~m~. Ne~t~IMe 60~2 J.~ 1003 '~ome~n 507 M - ~c. 1995 'i,Z,~Tri~ro~ 602.~ ..... .. J.~ 1,2,~Tfl~m~nz~ , , 90~2 "' ~ 1893 1,2~TdmethYi~e~ .... 602.~'~ . _ Ju~.~93 '"- 1,3,$T~th~m 502.2 ~ly 199 ~ ~ ..... We~ . AldJ~a~ S~fono ' ,. Wo~ld - ~di~ ~lfoxlde W~ . Alddn _ : ....... We~d . ' g~i~Nor . ,, Wa~ - ~Carba~l , " -' Wa~ ' Oicam~a ...... ' .... W.~ . Dieldrin . ,, Wo~ - M~homyl ' " , ._ We~ . Mmlac~r ...... ~7 .... Wl~ .... Men--tin W~ . ~p.~h~ ~7 Wl~ ' - , (4 · m~ , ~L ;?. ~. Radi~ Z2~ , , We~ . Urlnlum .... 20 ,, Wa~ M~ch 1983 If gru~u flph. activity exceods 5 pCI/L (meelu~od + IrTMI, miomJrumont of i, rardum arid r4HtJ~m-226 oho# bo made. If redium-228 exo44dt 9 pCJA., mell~lrlmom of rldium-22B ~ bl mldL P~ 3 of 3 ~ lies ~ Stmtlon ~ AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT Item No. lOa Date: February_ 21. 1996 SUBJECT: Authorize Payment to Spiegel and McDiarmid for Legal Services rendered relative to Headwater Benefit Issues, in the amount of $7,500 and Authorize the Director of Public Utilities to make payment from the City of Ukiah's General Operating Reserve Fund at the Northern California Power Agency. REPORT: In September 1994 the City of Ukiah became aware that Pacific Gas and Electric Company was going to request payment of Headwater Benefits relative to energy production from the Lake Mendocino Hydro Project from the beginning of commercial operations. In discussions with management at the Northern California Power Agency, familiar with Federal Energy Regulatory policies, it was recommended that we obtain a legal opinion from Spiegel and McDiarmid, who represent NCPA on Federal Energy Regulatory matters. Roger Fontes of NCPA arranged a meeting between Mayor Schneiter and Frances Francis, NCPA's representative at Spiegel and McDiarmid at the NCPA annual meeting on September 29, 1994. Based on that meeting Spiegel and McDiarmid produced several information papers and suggested preliminary strategies for the negotiations. This work was to be coordinated through Roger Fontes at NCPA, since NCPA had an unrelated interest in the headwaters benefit issue. As work being produced continued, it became clear that a majority of the work billed was related to research and review within Spiegel and McDiarmid and not directly related to work produced and delivered. ( Continued page 2 ) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize Payment to Spiegel and McDiarmid for Legal Services Rendered in the amount of $7,500 and Authorize the Director of Public Utilites to make payment from the City of Ukiah's General Operating Reserve Fund held at the Northern California Power Agency. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Deny Authorization and Direct Staff to Pursue Alternate Method of Payment. Acct. No. ( if not budgeted): Acct. No. (if budgeted) Appropriation Request: Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities ~ ~,~<z~.~' Prepared by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1) April 20,1995 Invoice 2) April 28, 1995 Letter 3) January 10, 1996 Invoice Candace Ho~ey~City~a~ager - ~, Page 2 On April 20, 1995 the City of Ukiah received an invoice that totaled $15,902.92 ( See attachment 1 ). On April 28, 1995, I transmitted the invoice to Roger Fontes and expressed our concern relative to the bill ( See Attachment 2 ). In May, the Mayor and myself meet with Roger Fontes and expressed our concerns about the billing totals, in relationship to the work received. Roger indicated that he would contact Frances Francis regarding their charges for research and work product review. We expressed that we felt that the City of Ukiah owed Spiegel and McDairmid for some work produced, but that we did not want to pay for their research efforts and data gathering relative to this issue. Roger Fontes indicated that he would make arrangements with Frances Francis for the revised invoice. Roger Fontes contacted Mayor Schneiter and indicated that Spiegel and McDiarmid woUld not charge for the work produced, so that the City of Ukiah would not owe Spiegel and McDiarmid. Mayor Schneiter indicated that this was not our intent and that the City of Ukiah owed Spiegel and McDiarmid for certain work, but we wanted the billing to fairly represent that work. The Mayor met with Frances Francis the last week of June to discuss the billing for the work produced by Spiegel and McDiarmid. The Mayor directed staff to review the invoices and to strike all items that were not directly related to the production of a work product relating to the headwaters benefit issue. Staff did as requested, and recommended that the total cost of this effort was approximately $7,500. In discussions between Frances Francis and Roger Fontes it was agreed that Spiegel and McDiarmid would revise the total bill, to $12,500. The City of Ukiah would pay $7,500 and NCPA would pay $5,000 ( Attachment 3 ). Arrangements for payment of this item has been made with the Northern California Power Agency from the City of Ukiah's General Operating Fund. Staff requests authorization to finalize the payment of the invoice. SPIEGEL & McDIARMID 1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-4798 TELEPHONE 1202) 879-4000 TELECOPiER 120;~1 393-2866 April 20, 1995 Mr. Daffy1 Barnes Director of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, C& 95482 Re= Ukiah, CA Our Matter # 05808.002 Dear Mr. Barnes= There is enclosed for your consideration a statement for professional services rendered through March, 1995. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, Frances E. Francis Enclosures FEF:tp Darryl Barnes Director of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID -1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20005'4798 TELEPHONE I-.~0;~) 879-4000 TELECOPIER (;~0~) 393-2866 FEDERAL I.D. #52-097,740 April 20, 1995 Invoice 21014467 Page 1 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH March 31, Our Matter 9 05808.002 Headwater Benefits FERC Project No. 2841 1995 Services printout. included those detailed in attached Be Finkelstein F. Francis C. Avedesian TOTAL Summary of Fees Hours Rate/Hr Dollars 1.00 195.00 195.00 2.00 245.00 490.00 .75 60.00 45.00 3.75 194.67 730.00 Total Fees for Professional Services ......... $ 730.00 Reimbursable Costs Computer Services Printing and Duplicating Local Transportation 11.99 54.45 8.00 Total Reimbursable Costs ..................... $ 74:. 44 Darryl Barnes Director of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID · 1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-4798 TELEPHONE 120E.') 879-4000 tEIECOPIER 1202i 393-2866 fEdERAL i.D. #52-0971740 April 20, 1995 Invoice 21014467 Page 2 Totals for This Matter Current Invoice - Fees for Professional Services ... Current Invoice - ReimbUrsable Costs ............... NET CURRENT BILLING FOR THIS MATTER ............. 730.00 74.44 TOTAL DUE FOR THIS MATTER ................................ $ 804.44 804.44 Totals for Ail Matters on This Previous Balance for Matters Shown.. ................ BALANCE BROUGHT FORWARD - ALL OUTSTANDING BILLS ... NET CURRENT BILLING FOR THIS INVOICE ............ PLEASE REMIT TOTAL INVOICE Invoice 15,098.48 15,098.48 804.44 BALANCE DUE .... · ............... $ 15,902.92 Darryl Barnes Director of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID 3350 NEW YORK AVENUE. U.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20005-4798 TELEPHONE IP02)879-4000 TELECOPIER ~:~02)393-2866 FEDERAL I.D. #5;~-0971740 Apr il 20, 1995 Invoice 21014467 INVOICE SUMMARY Our Matter # 05808.002 Headwater Benefits FERC Project No. 2841 For Services Through March 31, 1995 Current invoice - Fees for Professional Services ... Current invoice - Reimbursable Costs ............... NET CURRENT BILLING FOR THIS MATTER ............. 730.00 74.44 TOTAL DUE FOR THIS MATTER ................................ $ Totals for All Matters on This Invoice Previous Balance for Matters Shown ................. 15,098.48 BALANCE BROUGHT FORWARD - ALL OUTSTANDING BILLS ... NET CURRENT BILLING FOR THIS INVOICE ............ PLEASE REMIT TOTAL INVOICE BALANCE DUE ................... $ 804.44 804.44 15,098.48 804.44 15,902.92 DATE.'PRZHTED 04/20/95 12:11 FE£S BILL-THRU DATE 03/31/95 COST gILL-THRU DATE 03/31/95 BILLZHG PROFESSIOHAL: F. Franc/s DATE TIME- KEEPER HOURS 03/10/95 FEF 1.00 03/13/95 FEF 1.00 03113/95 CXA .75 03/15/95 BF 1.00 TOTAL HOURS.. 3.75 TOTAL DOLLAR UALUE .......... ~ DZLLZHC MEMO # CLZ[HT --- 05808 flATTER --- 0308.002 Headuater Benefits FERC Project Ho. 2841 ,TTflE (Throuqh 03/31,/,95) DOLLARS 245.00 245.(X) 45.00 195.00 #ORK DESCREPTZON read Louisville case and prepared flerm re d/scussion ~th Fred Schneiter; start further inquiry into ~hether Louisville is still pod 1au r~vt~ of Louisville case; follooed up ~th flargo re trac/ng judicial Ms~ory of Louisville case (sent by PG&E) Request 5 documents at FERC, relating to project backqround. research background of headwater case cited by R~E; urite up MeMo to Fran on s/gnificance and subsequent h/story 730.08 PAGE DATE RflOUHT 02/28195 3.98 03/27/95 8.00 03/31/95 8.01 03131195 54.45 TOTAL COSTS ..... $ 74.44 COSTS (Throuqh 03/31/95) CHECK COST DESCRIPTION HUMBER In-house cotq]uter services for 2195 Petty Cash statement dated 3/22/95 In-house computer services for 3/95 Ferc copying charges for March 1995 SUMMARY PHRASE 0 COil SERU[ 22139 TflXT 0 COil SERU[ 0 COPY Darryl Barnes Director of Public U~_ilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID '1350 NEW YORK. AVENUE. N.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. ~.0005-4798 TELEPHONE 120,-~! 879-4000 TELECOPIER {~.0~.1 39.3-~.866 FEDERAL I.D. #5;~-097,740 Apr il 20, 1995 Invoice 2]014467 I NVO I C E Our MaLter # 05808.002 IteadwaLer Ben'efits · FERC Pro3ect No. 284] ~ ..'-... invoice- Fees for Professional ServiceD>'... ,, invoice - Reimbursable Costs . . NET CURREHT BILLI~]G FOR THIS MATTE~ .... ',, ~ ........ TOTAL DUE FOR THIS MATTER ....... ToLals for &ll'"?ia~Lers on This Invoice Previous Balance for ~iaLLers;,~hown' . ................ BALAHCE BROUGHT FORWARD - ALL OUTSTANDIUG ~ILLS ... IIET CURRENT BILLING FoR THIS INVOICE ............ Current Current PLEASE REMI?xTOTAIJ'",~INVOICE BALANCE DUE For Services Through Harc'4~i3], 730.00 74.44 i.5, . . 1995 804.44 804.q4 {)98.48 80q. 4~ ]5,902.~2 300 · ADMIN. 707/463-6200 · PUBLIC SA.rElY 463-6242/6274 · FAX # 707/463-6204 · April 28, 1995 Mr. Roger Fontes Assistant General Manager Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, California 95678 Subject: Spiegel & McDiarmid Invoice Dear Roger; Attached for your information is the latest invoice for services provided by Spiegel & McDiarmid relative to Headwater Benefits. As can be seen, the amount due is beginning to reach a level that is causing us great concerns. Anything you could do to relieve this stress would be greatly appreciated. S~/~erely;, ,~ DarrylW_.: Barnes cc: Fred Schneiter '~/e Are Here To Serve" SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID 1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4798 TELEPHONE (202) 879-4000 FACSIMILE (202) 393-2866 EMAIL SPII:GEL@SPIEGEL.BECLTD.COM DIRECT DIAL (202) 879-4050 EMAIL FRANCISF@SPIEGEL.BECLTD.COM January 10, 1996 Darryl Barnes, Director Department of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 Roger Fontes Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, California 95678 Re: Spiegel & McDiarmid Bills Relating to Headwater Benefits Issue Dear Darryl and Roger: Based on my telephone call with Roger yesterday, I understand that it is agreeable to all parties that the currently outstanding Spiegel & McDiarmid bills be resolved in the following manner. First, a new invoice will be issued to replace Invoices 21013770, 21014115, 21014198 and 21014467, which total $15,902.92. Second, the amount of the new invoice will be $12,500, of which Ukiah agrees to pay $7,500 and NCPA agrees to pay $5,000. Any new work undertaken on behalf of Ukiah will be a separate matter to be agreed to beforehand between the City and Spiegel & McDiarmid. I am glad this matter has been resolved and thank you both for your assistance in bringing the matter to a close. Sincerely, Frances E. Francis cc: Accounting DocK: a7574 SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID 1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 2.0005-4798 TELEPHONE 12.02.) 879-4000 TELECOPIER (::~02.1 393-2.866 Federal I.D #52-0971740 January 10, 1996 Darryl Barnes, Director Department of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 Reolacement Invoice For Professional Services rendered from September 1994 through January 1995: Our Matter # 05808.002 Headwater Benefits FERC Project No. 2841 Replacement Invoice in lieu of Invoices, as referred to in letter of 1/10/96: 21013770 $10,548.04 *_/ (Ukiah) $ 5,274.02 21014115 4,319.05 21014198 231.39 21014467 804.44 $10,628.90 Total Amount Payable $ 7,500.00 *_/ We had divided this bill equally between NCPA and Ukiah. cc: Roger Fontes, NCPA SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID 1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-4798 TELEPHONE (20PI 879-4000 TELECOPIER 120;~1 393-2866 Federal I.D #52-0971740 January 10, 1996 Darryl Barnes, Director Department of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 Replacement Invoice For Professional Services rendered from September 1994 through January 1995: Our Matter # 05808.002 Headwater Benefits FERC Project No. 2841 Replacement Invoice in lieu of Invoices, as referred to in letter of 1/10/96: 21013770 $10,548.04 *_/ 03kiah) $ 5,274.02 21014115 4,319.05 21014198 231.39 21014467 804.44 $10,628.90 Total Amount Payable $ 7,500.00 *_/ We had divided this bill equally between NCPA and Ukiah. cc: Roger Fontes, NCPA SPIEGEL & iViCDIARMID 1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4798 TELEPHONE (202) 879-4000 FACSIMILE (202) 393-2866 EMAIL SPIEGELI~SPIEGEL.BECLTD.COM DIRECT DIAL (202) 879-4050 EMAIL FRANCISFQSPIEGEL.BECLTD.COM January 1 O, 1996 Darryl Barnes, Director Department of Public Utilities City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 Roger Fontes Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, California 95678 Re: Spiegel & McDiarmid Bills Relating to Headwater Benefits Issue Dear Darryl and Roger: Based on my telephone call with Roger yesterday, I understand that it is agreeable to all parties that the currently outstanding Spiegel & McDiarmid bills be resolved in the following manner. First, a new invoice will be issued to replace Invoices 21013770, 21014115, 21014198 and 21014467, which total $15,902.92. Second, the amount of the new invoice will be $12,500, of which Ukiah agrees to pay $7,500 and NCPA aerees to pay $5,000. Any new work undertaken on behalf of Ukiah will be a separate matter to be agreed to beforehand between the City and Spiegel & McDiarmid. I am glad this matter has been resolved and thank you both for your assistance in bringing the matter to a close. cc: Accounting Sincerely, Frances E. Francis Doc# 47574 Federal I.D #52-0971740 SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID 1350 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20005-4?98 TELEPHONE (202) 879-4000 TELECOPIER (202) 393-:~866 January 10, 1996 Roger Fontes Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, California 95678 Replacement Invoice For Professional Services rendered from September 1994 through November 1994: Our Matter # 05808.002 Headwater Benefits FERC Project No. 2841 Replacement Invoice in lieu of Invoice, as referred to in letter of 1/10/96: 21013770 $10,548.04 *_/ (NCPA) $ 5,274.02 Total Amount Payable $ 5,000.00 *_/ We had divided this bill equally between NCPA and Ukiah. CC: Darryl Barnes, City of Ukiah