Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-07 Packet CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Uklah, CA 95482 August 7, 1996 6:30 p.m. Mastin/Wattenburger Absent 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance 3. Special Order of Business a. Introduction of Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, Elizabeth Brazil 4. Approval of Minutes ii' -Regular Adjourned Meeting of June 25-27, 1996 (continued) ii. Special Meeting of July 17, 1996 A~proved As Submitted ~ iiL~__Regular Meeting of July 17, 1996 , .RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety (90) days the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. Ordinance No. 967 Ordinance No. 968 Amount Revised to $51,824.38 ApproVed Consent a-k, m-n -- Unanimous of those present 6. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilrnember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. ~ Report of Disbursements for the Month of July 1996 b. Adoption of Ordinance Amending City Treasurer Compensation c. Adoption of Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of Division 8 of the City of Ukiah City Code Regulating Parking in Municipal Parking Lots d. Approve Project Change Orders and Release of Retention to Pacific Mechanical Corporation and Authorize the City Clerk to Publish a Notice of Completion Relative to Work Performed During the Construction of the Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility e. Approval of Budget Amendment for Expenditures Relative to Tree Trimming Services f. Authorization for Pay Freightliner Enterprise Corporation/American LaFrance Fire Apparatus, in the Amount of $51,824.28, for Repair to Fire Department Aerial Ladder Truck g. Declaration of Surplus Property and Authorize the Purchasing Officer to Solicit Bids and Dispose of Property if No Bids are Received h. Receive Report of the Acquisition of Cataphote Powder for Traffic Marking Applications i. Award of Consultant Service Cortract to Lawrence and Associates, in the Amount of $25,764, to Construct Five Gas Monitoring Wells j. Notification to Council Regarding Purchase of Uquid Aluminum Chiorhydroxide The City of Uklah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request Approved - Pulled, became Item No. 9e .. Approved Resolution No. 97-12 _k. Authorize the Mayor to Execute Service Schedule No. One to the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement Relating to the Identified Power Sale to Shelter Cove Resort Improvement District No. One I. Adoption of Policy Resolution Modifying Policy Resolution No. 25 Regarding Reimbursement of Expenses for Elected and/or Appointed City Officials, Officers, and Employees _ m. Approve Legal Publishing Services as Submitted by Ukiah Daily Journal for Fiscal Year 1996/97 n. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Application for Federal Excess Property in _____Accordance with Title IV, Rural Development Act 1972 . AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ordinance No. 969 a. Adoption of Ordinance Rezoning Various Properties in and Around the Wagenseller Unanimous--Absent: Shoe/_ Neighborhood, Pursuant to Implementation of the Adopted General Plan Extended Time for~lb. Approval of Agreements Between the City of Ukiah and Redwood Business Park Negotiations Owners, et al, for Extension of Airport Park Boulevard J 9. NEW BUSINESS introduced_ (Unanimous) -a. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Sections 2580 and 2581 of the Ukiah City Hastin arrived 7: 15 pm Code to Require Drug and Alcohol Testing of Taxi Cab Drivers Received Report, b. Presentation of Final Report for Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Authorized Public C. Adopt Resolution Establishing No Parking Zone on Both Sides of South State Hearing Street from 200 Feet North of Mill Street to 250 Feet South of Hastings Avenue introduced Unanimous d. Introduction of Ordinance Amending §101 of the Ukiah Municipal Code Relative to City Manager Position Adop.tion of Policy Resolution Modifying Pol, i, cy Policy Res. No. 29 _____e. CR~imb]]r~m~ne ~O~"~nsesI~'~0-0~~" ~ for Elected Res. No. 25 Re~ardin~ ana/or Appointed City Officials Vote Unanimous 10. Officers, and Employees 11. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS 12. CLOSED SESSION a. Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Anticipated Litigation - Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 (1 case) 13. ADJOURNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - June 25-27, 1996 The City Council convened in a regular adjourned meeting, which was legally posted and noticed, at 9:01 a.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, with the following Councilmembers PRESENT: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. ABSENT: None. Staff Present: Customer Service Supervisor Archibald, Finance Director Elton, Assistant City Manager Harris, City Manager Horsley, Public Safety Director Keplinger, MIS Coordinator Klingbeil, Planning Director Sawyer, Executive Assistant Yoast, and City Clerk Giuntoli. Mayor Schneiter opened the hearing at 9:05 a.m., gave introductory remarks, and defined the process of conducting the hearing. Overview of Proposed Bud.q_et by City_ Manager City Manager Horsley advised a review of individual goals and objectives given at a recent Council workshop would not be conducted during these meetings; relevant items involving changes/revisions requiring discussion would be highlighted by the Directors. She thanked Finance Director Elton and Assistant Manager Harris for their many hours of work during budget preparation, and stated she felt the information presented is clear and concise. Ms. Horsley presented an overview of the proposed 1996/97 budget, emphasizing that the major challenge will be to review the current operations and programs and develop a plan of operation for future years that will best match available revenues and projected expenses. She stated that in the last five years, the General Fund has spent an average of $225,000 per year over estimated revenue. City reserves and one-time revenues have been steadily depleted to a level that the 1997/98 expenditures must be reduced by $1 million or additional revenue sources must be established. The projected 1995/96 total revenues and expenses indicate a reduction of $1.2 million in the General Fund (#100) fund balance. These reductions were primarily the result of the loan to the Redevelopment Agency, transfers to cover deficits in various funds, and expenses exceeding revenue. During 1996/97, the general fund balance is projected to decrease by $392,500. Expenses are projected to exceed revenue by $849,000. Revenues are projected to remain static. Ms. Horsley summarized by further stating that the total fund balance in the 1995/96 submitted budget showed a decrease in ending fund balance of $2.3 million. The actual balance changed dramatically to a combined fund balance decrease of $4.4 million. This reduction was due primarily to the sale of the derivatives and the set aside for litigation reserves. Loans to the Redevelopment Agency were the other most significant factor in the decrease. The proposed 1996/97 budget includes an additional total fund balance reduction of $2.45 million. The largest portion of this decrease comes from the expenditure of Gas Tax money on various street and road improvements ($1,090,000). Other significant reductions are General Fund ($393,000); Solid Waste Disposal ($386,000); Water ($135,000); and Golf ($108,000). Projected additional revenue generated by rate increases are included in the budget to cover the Electric Utility ($1,365,000) and the Street Light Fund ($37,751) deficits. If rate increases are not adopted to provide this additional revenue and/or expenses are not reduced in a comparable amount, fund balances will decline by an additional $1.4 million. Continuing her summary, Ms. Horsley stated the trend of using reserves to cover declining revenues started several years ago. The City is currently in a position that requires immediate steps to be taken by the next budget year to reverse this direction in spending. Financial planning is imperative to achieve a strategy that will be effective as well as prudent to the long term financial health of the City. Major changes in policy as well as programming need to be considered to lower expenses and eliminate deficit spending. Funds have been included in the budget to hold intensive financial planning sessions in the first five months of the year to analyze alternatives and options for each department. All programs and services will be examined to identify methods for continuing the maximum service levels for the citizens of Ukiah while living within the financial resources available. This proposed budget establishes the base from which to move toward a more economical service delivery plan. Discussion followed relative to the City's financial status, with Ms. Horsley noting staff was desirous of making major decisions and changes well before next year's budget. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 1 Councilmember Shoemaker stated his desire that this Council be accountable for the City's financial situation, and that it take action to remedy the problems rather than delegating the responsibility to a newly elected Council. Councilmember Wattenburger stated he thought it was prudent the three retiring Councilmembers leave the budget with a sound set of management practices; however, he was uncomfortable with establishing budget cuts during these meetings, and would prefer to examine the basis for the cuts within a September/October time frame. Councilmember Mastin concurred with Councilmember Shoemaker's preference to take action prior to the election in November. Councilmember Malone expressed his disappointment at the Council's past lack of understanding regarding the overspending, and voiced his preference for prompt action. Mayor Schneiter stated he was desirous of setting the City's financial future in the right direction prior to the completion of his Council term. Review of General Budget Figure~ Fund Summary Finance Director Elton reported on the Fund Summary, noting the addition of, General Fund Subsidy. He stated that whether the funds in that category were determined as loans or as transfers from the General Fund was a policy decision that could be made by the Council. Discussion followed relative to loans in comparison to transfers, and whether it was realistic to expect that loans to the Conference Center, Solid Waste Disposal, and Golf would be paid back in a reasonable period of time. It was noted there should not be a subsidy to an enterprise fund that is not a loan. MIS Shoemaker/Malone to determine subsidies to the Conference Center, Solid Waste Disposal, and Golf, listed as General Fund Subsidies, shall be considered as loans, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, and Shoemaker. NOES: Councilmembers Wattenburger and Mayor Schneiter. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Mr. Elton continued his review of the Fund Summary. The Council queried staff regarding the electric fund, transfers, debt service, reserve accounts, and revenue projections. Discussion followed regarding electric revenues, cost of services, and reduction of expenses. Schedule of Transfers Mr. Elton reviewed the Schedule of Transfers, and described the three reserve funds of Worker's Compensation Liability, General Liability, and Public Employee Retirement System (PERS). Discussion followed relative to the reserve funds; it was noted the PERS reserves will not be replaced. Debt Summary Mr. Elton reviewed the Debt Summary for fiscal year 1996-97, wherein each individual debt is identified with the amount that is to be paid during the current budget year, the remaining balance, and date final payment will be made. The Council queried staff regarding principal and interest, internal debt, debt payment to outside services, redevelopment, and property tax revenue. General Fund Expenditures and Revenue Mr. Elton reviewed the General Fund expenditures and revenues, noting the Department Request column under Total Expenditures had been reduced from a $7.6 million total to $6.8 million. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 2 The Council queried staff regarding Miscellaneous Revenues for 1994-95; the increase in Charges for Services due to combining the ambulance revenue into the General Fund; rent and insurance charges for individual departments; general government service charges; and City Attorney fees. MIS Wattenburger/Shoemaker to authorize loans to Golf Fund for $17,314; Museum Grant Funds of $2,958 and $2,908; Airport Capital Improvement Fund of $28,316; and Federal Emergency Housing of $31,088; carried by an all AYE voice vote. Authorized Personnel Ms. Horsley reviewed the proposed personnel changes, noting that most of the positions that have been changed are actual trades or exchanges between departments. Overall there has been an increase of approximately one position over last year; since 1992 there have been 20 positions added within the City. The one additional position represents no dollar increase since part-time positions were eliminated to fund the full-time position. Recessed' 10:36 a.m. Reconvened' 10:49 a.m. Review of General Fund/Enterprise Fund Account~ City Council Discussion followed relative to the Travel and Conference Expense; telephone costs, which include an enhanced phone system with voice mail; and group insurance costs. No changes were recommended to the proposed budgeted amounts. City Clerk/Elections Ms. Horsley advised the Travel and Conference and Training Budgets had been left intact with the exception of the California and National City Clerk's Association meetings, which the newly elected City Clerk will have the option to attend. City Treasurer Ms. Horsley advised that due to the establishment of the Investment Oversiqht Committee, staff is recommending a significant reduction in the salary and duties of the City ~reasurer. City Attorney Ms. Horsley advised the City Attorney has had a three-tier rate structure; the last rate increase occurred three years ago. Staff is proposing a fiat $100 per hour rate for all services in lieu of the three-tier rate. Discussion followed relative to the billing of fees and distribution of charges when litigation is involved, and a process which may allow some recouping of costs incurred for lawsuits filed against the City, which the City wins. ,City Management and Administration City Manaper The Council queried staff relative to the Reimbursable Credit and the time allocation of the City Manager's function assigned to the Enterprise Funds. Personnel/Risk Management Ms. Horsley reported on the new Council approved half-time position of Compliance Officer. Recessed: 11:36 a.m. Reconvened' 11:39 a.m. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 3 Secretarial Pool Executive Assistant Yoast reported on the change in salaries caused by the transfer of Kari Revheim to Personnel Officer, and the increase in the hours of the part-time Administrative Secretary from 1,000 hours per year to approximately 1,500 hours. Discussion followed regarding the new copier, the optical scanning system, and the possibility of posting Council agendas on the FreeNet. Community Outreach/Public Information Ms. Horsley reported on the proposed changes, including the elimination of the City newsletter and the attitude survey, Discussion followed regarding support to community activities/economic development. It was noted that although there were many worthy agencies deserving of the funds, the City was proposing budget cuts and could not continue to give away money it did not have. It was the consensus of the Council to discuss the matter post-budget. A verbal tally of the Council indicated Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, and Shoemaker were in favor of leaving No. 690 - Special Supplies in the budget; Councilmember Wattenburger and Mayor Schneiter were in favor of its deletion from the budget. Miscellaneous General Government Assistant City Manager Harris reviewed the report, noting that the City's participation in Mendocino Emergency Services Association JPA was a new item. Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Mr. Harris advised the City is on the tentative list for another two-year round. The $110,000 is for the expenditures for this year; there will be a reciprocal amount next year. The Council queried staff on the negative number shown in 1995-96, which was explained as a matter of cash flow; the bills have not yet been submitted to the State. Fixed Asset Replacement Fund Mr. Harris reviewed the report, and highlighted the Fire Department purchases of the new replacement ambulance and the construction of a new fire tower. Recess: 12:11 p.m. Reconvene: 12:50 p.m. Finance Mr. Elton reported the most significant change in this area is the deletion of the Controller position, which the City was unable to fill after two recruitments. Funds for project work on a contractual basis have been proposed, and some of the training and travel expenses have been reduced. MIS Coordinator Paulette Klingbeil reported IBM advised staff that at this time they were considering the system upgradable and some of the parts transferable into a newer machine; after October 31 they will not consider any of the equipment transferable to any of their other machines. Discussion followed relative to the upgrading/replacement of the current computer system. Computer Support Services Ms. Klingbell reported the computers purchased a year ago had failed to perform as well as some of the more expensive models, although they met the City specifications. Business Improvement District Mr. Elton reported this was the fund wherein the additional Business Tax License from the Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 4 Business Improvement District is recorded. Amounts in the past have been used to fund the Main Street Program, although there appears to be no official or formal document written between the City and Main Street. Councilmember Shoemaker expressed his dissatisfaction with the appearance of the downtown area. Discussion followed relative to maintenance of the downtown areas and the involvement of Main Street and the Downtown Merchants in that endeavor. Purchasing/Warehouse Staff reviewed the reduction in costs due to personnel changes, and advised that the Purchasing Supervisor will move to an office in the Civic Center to allow for better integration within the Finance Department, thus eliminating the need for a remodeling of the warehouse. Council queried staff relative to personnel in attendance at the warehouse and the person responsible for the active inventory. It was determined the Utility Department will have the primary responsibility in that area. Billing and Collection Mr. Elton advised that previously the salary of one of the Customer Service Representatives had been charged directly to the Parking Fund. With the addition of the Customer Service Supervisor, that position has been combined into the Billing and Collection budget and allows for better integration and cross training in staff. The Parking District is then charged under reimbursable charges for the value of the services provided in handling the parking permits and tickets. The result is a net decrease in costs to the Parking District. Council queried staff on the significant amount of charges listed under utilities. Customer Service Supervisor Archibald advised regarding the costs involved in turning the power off for customers due to nonpayment, which averages approximately 40 times per month, trips involved to turn power back on, and staff time involved explaining utility bills. Discussion followed relative to separate billing, hiring a billing service, and the costs involved. It was noted that if the Electric Department contracted for billing, it could be done at a lesser cost but would lack the customer support element. Planning Community Planning Planning Director Sawyer advised staff concurs with the City Manager's recommendations and the budget cuts suggested in various areas. He requested a proposal be brought forth to increase the planning permit fees; presently Planning is only recouping 25% of the costs incurred in issuing planning permits. There are no other substantive increases proposed in the budget. Building Inspection Mr. Sawyer reported there were two requests for an increase in the budget, one being to reclassify the Code Enforcement Officer/Plan Checker, and the other for a $3,000 setaside for training for the Building Inspector and Code Enforcement Officer, as required by law. He further reported the building permit increases have been an overwhelming success with revenues collected up by 63%, whereas the number of permits are virtually identical. The Council queried staff regarding Contractual Services and funds for private-sector plan checking services such as structural engineering and energy conservation. Recessed: 1:46 p.m. Reconvened: 1:52 p.m. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 5 Public Safety Police Public Safety Director Keplinger reported he agreed with the City Manager's recommendations and concurred with the major budget cuts. He outlined the personnel changes, which included the development of the Evidence Technician position through the elimination of three part-time Community Service Officers' positions, and the change in the status of the receptionist and records clerk from part-time to full-time. Mayor Schneiter inquired whether there would be any level of deterioration in service to the community as a result of the budget cuts. Mr. Keplinger replied the response time will be the same. He further reported that drastic reductions were made in Prisoner Expenses, and that the additional K-9 training was eliminated. There will be no new vehicles purchased during this budget year. Council queried staff regarding cellular telephone fees, liability for K-9 dog bites suffered during apprehension of a criminal, booking fees, SWAT calls, the use of bicycles, and capital improvement. Narcotics Task Force Mr. Keplinger reported there were no major changes from last year's budget with the exception of the increased personnel costs. Discussion followed regarding the validity of the program and the cost of the task force versus having the narcotics officer position in-house. It was noted costs for either would be approximately the same; the difference would be in the control staff could exercise over assigned tasks. Further discussion followed relative to county wide drug activity. Police Reserves Mr. Keplinger continued his review of the Police Reserve Fund. He noted that Training Expenses were reduced due to the fact the training conference for the Reserves will be held in Sacramento, thus eliminating the need for air fare. Fire Mr. Keplinger advised the most significant change was the upgrade of one Captain position to Battalion Chief level. He further advised the ladder truck did not pass inspection; the repair will cost $45,000 and there is a $15,000 insurance deductible that has not been calculated into the budget. The department is presently attempting to sell some of the older equipment. Discussion followed relative to bringing homes in the western hills in compliance with weed abatement requirements. Fire Volunteers Mr. Keplinger advised there were five Emergency Medical Technician II's that will take the paramedic upgrade exam, resulting in a total of eleven City paramedics. Parking District There were no significant changes noted. Councilmember Shoemaker commented on the rundown appearance of one of the City's downtown parking lot. Ms. Horsley advised the City may not replace the Parking Enforcement Officers since the current employees are approaching retirement age, and the City is gradually eliminating the parking meters. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 6 Dispatch Mr. Keplinger reported the City is now eligible to have the 9-1-1 system replaced; there are funds available to have it paid for by the State. He further reported that Ukiah Ambulance will be taking their dispatch business to CDF instead of the City. The Council queried staff regarding the ambulance contract, antiquated dispatch equipment, and cramped working space. Council recessed at 2:56 p.m. June 26, 1996 The regular adjourned meeting was called to order at 9:03 a.m. with the following Councilmembers PRESENT: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker (with a 10:45 a.m. arrival), and Mayor Schneiter (with an 11:28 a.m. departure). ABSENT: None. Staff present: Director of Public Utilities Barnes, Water and Sewer Superintendent Borecky, Golf and Parks Superintendent Carpenter, Finance Director Elton, Community Services Director DeKnoblough, Public Works Administrator Goodrick, Assistant City Manager Harris, City Manager Horsley, Public Works Director Kennedy, Public Works Superintendent Looney, Community Services Supervisor Weselsky, Museum Director Wilson, and City Clerk Giuntoli. Continue Review of General Fund/Enterprise Fund Accounts City Manager Horsley reviewed the changes to the budget made as a result of the previous day's discussions. Public Works Engineering and Administration Public Works Director Kennedy reviewed the highlights of the propoSed budget, which reflect a total budget increase of $25,900 from last year. He noted there has been a reduction in revenue received from gas tax monies due primarily to the greater apportionment to growing communities, as compared to a city such as Ukiah, which has a flat population rate. Projected revenues will be $267,000; last year staff projected revenues of $277,000, and the actual figures will be under that projection. Discussion followed regarding the gas tax revenue. Street Maintenance Mr. Kennedy advised the increase in salaries and benefits of $25, 853 is due primarily to the change in the position of Public Works Administrator to Deputy Public Works Director, and the increased allocation of this position from 10% to 20%. The biggest portion of the increase is due to a reallocation of the Street Sweeper's time; staff is proposing an allocation of 40% of the time charged to Street Maintenance, and 60% allocated to Street Sweeping. Council queried staff relative to Waugh Lane and improvement of Perkins Street. It was noted there were no funds allocated for Perkins Street improvements. Discussion followed relative to various traffic projects and the timeline involved for project completion. Corporation Yard Mr. Kennedy advised the large increase in project costs is due to contractual services for removal of the gas pumps and tanks at the Yard. Staff is proposing use of card lock systems, which would result in an increase of 15 cents per gallon, and would force an increase in the surcharge charged to other departments from 13 cents to 24 cents. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 7 Discussion followed regarding underground tanks and the tightening of controls in waste management. Gas Tax Projects Mr. Kennedy reviewed the projects to be completed with gas tax monies, and advocated taking a look at the larger picture prior to funds being allocated. SB 325 Mr. Kennedy advised the expenditure of $50,000 will be allocated towards the final design of the Orchard Avenue bridge at Orr Creek. Municipal Garage Mr. Kennedy advised the Garage Supervisor will not be replaced; a portion of the Deputy Public Works Director's time has been allocated to management of that department; and a new 50% position of Garage Service Clerk is being proposed. He further advised Operation and Maintenance reflected an increase due to the higher cost of fuel and parts. Recessed: 10:14 a.m. Reconvened: 10:24 a.m. Solid Waste Disposal Site Mr. Kennedy advised staff was proposing the conversion of the part.time positions to a full-time position. Originally staff had requested the position of Maintenance Aide; however, they would prefer a Maintenance Attendant, which would result in an additional cost of approximately $11,500. Comparable reductions have been proposed to offset the increase. He further advised staff is projecting $300,000 more in revenue than is indicated in this year's ending. However, the fund will be approximately $270,000 in the red for the year ending 1994/95; the revenue will help offset the deficit from the beginning of the year. The year will end $202,810 in the black due to the fact some of the budgeted projects have not been completed. Mr. Kennedy continued his review of the Solid Waste Disposal Site improvements, including leachate pond operations and maintenance, and groundwater monitoring wells. Council queried staff regarding soil covering and the auger/scraper. Council also queried staff regarding closure reserve funds. Refuse/Debris Clean-Up Enterprise Fund Councilmember Shoemaker arrived at 10:45 a.m. Council queried staff regarding the impact of the severe winter storm. It was noted there were no FEMA funds available for storm clean-up; expenses were absorbed in the salaries for the Street Department. Councilmember Shoemaker inquired whether the tree trimmers receive training and was informed the City arborist will be conducting the training. Councilmember Malone commented on the complaints of the Downtown Merchants relative to tree limbs growing over the tops of the buildings, and thereby increasing the maintenance due to leaves and debris in the gutter. Discussion followed relative to combining sweeping and weed killing in one process, and the need for a spray training program. Further discussion followed regarding Spring Clean-Up Week, with the notation that fewer people participated this year. The program will be evaluated relative to how it may be improved. Public Works Administrator Goodrick advised twice the number of senior citizens from last year were served by the program. Volunteers are continuing to assist the seniors because of the numerous uncompleted projects, even though the dates for clean-up have ended. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 8 Community Services General Government Buildings Community Services Director DeKnoblough advised that repair and renovation of the Civic Center facade had been budgeted for under Machinery and Equipment. During power washing of the building, it was observed that large pieces of stucco were loose and ready to fall due to inadequate cure time at the time of remodeling. In addition, water leaks are causing mold and damage to the walls. Discussion followed related to the condition of the building. It was noted the budgeted amount of $30,000 was for the facade repair only; repair of the entire building will cost approximately $250,000. Parks Ms. Horsley advised Mr. DeKnoblough's salary is now included in the budget; the previous Director's salary was included in the Personnel budget. Mayor Schneiter left the meeting and Vice-Mayor Shoemaker assumed the Chair at 11:28 a.m. Park Development Fund Mr. DeKnoblough advised it may be possible for the County to adopt an in-lieu fee ordinance that will enhance the City parks, since the County population is being served by City parks now. Recreation Tammi Weselsky, Community Services Coordinator, advised the women's basketball group will be eliminated as a City-sponsored program. She further advised the concession stand at the City pool will not open this year, but there will be a snack machine installed next to the soft drink machine. A new position of Activities Assistant for 1000 hours is being proposed to help with the sports programs and special events such as the Concert Series and PumpkinFest. Discussion followed relative to revenues for recreation programs and the use of franchise fees to supplement other City recreational programs. MIS Malone/Wattenburger to explore the possibility of charging a franchise fee to outside groups using City facilities, carried by an all AYE voice vote. Discussion followed relative to the men's softball team contract and use of the third field. It was suggested the current contract be reviewed and guidelines revised to be more specific; it is not stipulated in the current contract that the City can use the facilities out of season. MIS Malone/Wattenburger to review with action the contract with the men's softball program for performance of the third field, carried by an all AYE voice vote. Vice-Mayor Shoemaker suggested a two member committee be formed to consult with the City Manager relative to the issue. Ms. Weselsky requested the contract with Ukiah Unified School District be reviewed also. Aquatics Mr. DeKnoblough advised the aquatics budget deficit will be $65,000, primarily due to the increase in non-regular salaries. Several options will be considered during the year to reduce the deficit. Council queried staff regarding videotaping, age and condition of the swimming pool, and maintenance. It was noted only preventative maintenance to meet the health requiremements had been done to the pool up to this time; no projects have been instituted that will give longevity to the facility. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 9 Kort Peterson, Youth Services Ukiah, gave a short presentation during which he thanked Council for the $80,000 support for the Youth Services Ukiah (YSU) program. He stated he understood the City will not refund the program, and requested that he be allowed to continue to use the YSU logo, name, and program and try and network with other non-profit organizations in the community as long as the program continues to embody its original philosophy as a volunteer youth organization which has contributed to the well-being of the community. He will seek a letter from the other non-profit organizations releasing the City from the liability of the program; the Police Activities League (PAL) organization has demonstrated a willingness to assume that liability. He further requested that all the resources that have been purchased with monies dedicated to YSU be made available to him, such as painting supplies, maintenance supplies, access to a computer, and possible access to a desk and phone. Ms. Horsley stated she had a list of supplies the City can let Mr. Peterson have and others he can use during the transition. Council voiced their support of Youth Services Ukiah, and expressed their disappointment the program would not be funded. Mr. Peterson inquired regarding the van he had been using for transportation, and stated the maintenance had consumed much of his budget. He requested Council consider the possibility of a potential transfer of the vehicle to another non-profit organization that would assume its liability and maintenance. MIS WattenburgerlMastin to approve Mr. Peterson's requests and direct the City Manager to work towards that end, carried by an all AYE voice vote. Recessed: 12:15 p.m. Reconvened: 12:50 p.m. Grace Hudson Museum/Sun House/Museum Grant Funds Rob Wilson, Museum Director, advised the full-time vacant Curator position was filled with two part-time employees, and that they had received a National Science Foundation Grant for $60,000. Council had no questions regarding this project. Municipal Golf Course Reed Carpenter, Golf and Parks Superintendent, noted the increase in Grounds Maintenance, reduction in Travel and Conference Expense, and advised Council that staff was meeting with the Golf Course Committee regarding proposals to offset the $136,000 deficit. Discussion followed relative to golfer's complaints regarding weekend tournaments, membership increases, various fees, and the need for the City's recreation programs to pay a fair share of their operations budget. Conference Center Bruce Jenney, Conference Center Manager, reviewed the budget, defined the differences between conference and convention centers, and stated studies of national conference centers have shown 80% to 90% of total revenue should and will come from corporate entities, less than 1% to2% from social functions, and the balance from associations. Discussion followed regarding the merit of expending funds for a dance floor in the Center since the revenue generated by social functions was projected to be extremely Iow. Councilmember Mastin queried staff regarding the level of support given to the Ukiah Chamber of Commerce by the Conference Center. Mr. Jenney replied that approximately 62% of phone calls and reception desk inquiries were related to the Chamber and tourists/visitors. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 10 Councilmember Mastin stated it was his understanding the Chamber itself would staff the front desk in the Convention Center. Discussion followed regarding secretarial assistance and the Conference Center's relationship with the Chamber. It was noted the City Manager rejected the staffing proposal because the Chamber requested the City pay half the salary. It was suggested there be an accounting of the benefit involved to the Chamber by placing a merit value on items such as phone calls to credit against future funding requests. Mr. DeKnoblough reported the significant salary increase for the General Services Attendant was due to the additional maintenance activities which the Redevelopment Agency is prohibited from funding. Municipal Airport/Special Aviation Don Bua, Airport Manager, reported that little had changed regarding the Airport revenues and expenditures, and noted that the Building and Grounds Maintenance Fund reflected a holdover from 1995/96 budgeted monies for striping the runway if state monies are not available. He further noted the increase in interest expense for the Electric Utility payment. Discussion followed regarding the dollar reduction in the category of Miscellaneous Revenue and the relationship of revenue to the number of fires in the area. Council queried staff regarding Miscellaneous Revenue, cost of fuel and new tanks. It was suggested that, for further clarification, "landing fees" be separated out of the category. Discussion followed relative to lease policies and parking within the Airport. A Motion by Councilmember Malone to prohibit parking on both sides of State Street along the Airport corridor during the annual Ukiah Air Show, charging for on-site parking, and allowing organizations to offer inexpensive seats on the grass along the fence, died for lack of a second. It was the consensus of the Council that the parking issue needed to be addressed, but that there would be insufficient time this year to implement the necessary procedures. Recessed: 2:10 p.m. Reconvened: 2:18 p.m. Public Utilities Electric Darryl Barnes, Director of Public Utilities, reported that the Electric Department will not realize its revenue expectations and will be approximately $1.4 million short of meeting its expenditures. He cited the increase in purchase power, amount required for the bond covenant, and the cool summer and mild winter as being contributory factors. He further reported that a 15% rate increase would be needed to offset the revenue shortfall. Discussion followed relative to the proposed rate increase, possible suggestions for securing revenue through other options, and the impacts which would occur as a result of not implementing the increase in rates. It was noted that one option would be to propose a 6% to 7% rate increase at the present time, together with a plan for cost-cutting measures. Further discussion followed relative to use of the Electric Reserve Funds. Councilmember Malone stated he would support the notion of splitting the rate increase and getting a better picture of the situation in six months. Vice-Mayor Shoemaker stated he concurred with Councilmember Malone, but was concerned regarding the projected effect on the budget if a 7% increase was implemented now, and another 7% increase in six months. Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page '11 Councilmember Wattenburger asked Mr. Barnes for his recommendation relative to Council's action regarding the situation. He stated he did not think the public would accept a 15% rate increase, and that he foresaw the City losing customers to the competition. Mr. Barnes replied he did not like to make promises he knew he could not keep, and stated that even without the issue of deregulation, there was still the problem of not being able to pay the bills. Although he disliked raising rates and being non-competitive, he saw limited options at this point. He voiced his frustration at operating with a "bare bones" budget and having nowhere else to cut expenses. Discussion followed regarding personnel reductions, franchise and utility fees, and the refinancing or possible sale of the hydroelectric plant. Vice-Mayor Shoemaker stated he favored a 7% rate increase and elimination of the $674,000 franchise fee. Councilmember Mastin stated he advocated proposing the entire 15% rate increase. Councilmember Malone stated he was in support of the 7% rate increase and exploration of distribution of the franchise fees. Councilmember Wattenburger stated he was in favor of a maximum 7% rate increase, and that he felt the public would not accept anything higher. Vice-Mayor Shoemaker recommended continuing this item to Thursday afternoon, following the scheduled 1:00 p.m. Redevelopment meeting, when the full Council would be present for discussion. He requested that Mr. Elton prepare a scenario considering the possibility Council would fund only half the increase, define how much was in reserves, and promote in the strategic planning process that the franchise fee be eventually eliminated or severely cut back. Street Lighting Mr. Elton reported that although electric rates have increased significantly, the $1.50 street light charge had not changed since 1988. He recommended the charge be raised to a $2.00 a month fiat rate, reflecting a 33% increase. Traffic Signals There were no comments by the Council. Water Mr. Barnes reported the proposed budget projected a shortfall primarily due to the increase in the cost of operations; there are no extraordinary expenditures. It was noted there had been no increase in water rates since 1992, which amounted to approximately $4 per month per customer, and covered the construction of the water treatment facility. Sewer Mr. Barnes reviewed the budget, and reported that the plant operations and maintenance costs of $1.4 million also contain $280,000 of non-recurring expenses to complete the levee repair and the study to look at the relocations of the levees back into the ponds. General discussion followed relative to the hookup costs involved to the City with the Mendocino Brewing Company. Recessed: 3:47 p.m. Reconvened: 5:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Ukiah Valley Sanitation District and Ukiah City Council for Review and Adoption of 1996-97 City/District Sewer Service Fund Budget The City Council convened at 5:00 p.m. in a Joint Meeting with Ukiah Valley Sanitation District Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 12 Councilmember Malone stated he would support a 10% increase, with a change in the refund number from NCPA. Councilmember Wattenburger stated he would support an 8% increase. Councilmember Shoemaker stated he would support a 15% rate increase and the removal of transfers in the amount of $143,780 in the reserves. Mayor Schneiter stated he would support the 15% rate increase minus the PERS and insurance reserve transfer in the amount of the $143,780. He further stated he supported the reduction of the franchise fee tax. Discussion followed as the Council attempted to reach a consensus. Recessed: 2:58 p.m. Reconvened: 3:09 p.m. Consideration of Any Budget Issues Councilmember Wattenburger reiterated his previous comments, and emphasized the $20,000 designated in the budget as Community Funds should not be distributed if the City is short of revenue. He discussed franchise fees, and stated the departments have grown dependent on the Electric Utility to the point where that dependence is driving the cost of the utilities. Departments subsidized by the Electric Fund need to be reduced, or other revenue sources explored to generate the necessary support. All departments need to be examined, including Fire, Police, and the Golf Course. Councilmember Mastin concurred with Mr. Wattenburger's comments, and stated that the City was obviously headed for some difficult times and could not afford to have any "sacred cows;" sacrifices will have to be made. All departments should be examined, including cuts in personnel. He recommended that next year the Electric Department should be the first budget considered, since it affects numerous other items in the budget. Councilmember Malone concurred with Councilmembers Mastin and Wattenburger, and further stated that when expenses exceed revenue, immediate cuts should be made. He recommended a quarterly report in terms of revenue projections, and agreed with putting the Electric Utility first in the budgeting process. He requested initial projections regarding the reductions be submitted to the Council within 90 days. Ms. Horsley stated she has already notified the Personnel Director not to fill any positions that come open without examining each one carefully, and to start the attrition process immediately. The strategic planning process has already begun. Councilmember Shoemaker stated he preferred the strategic planning information be submitted to the Council within 60 days. The Council must be prepared to take action predicated on the idea there is an absolute necessity for a $1 million reduction by this time next year. He further stated he was uncertain how to conditionally approve a budget in this form, yet say that in the next 12 months cuts would be implemented that would cut $600,000 out of this budget by the end of the fiscal year. Mayor Schneiter stated his desire to adopt the Budget Resolution as modified and adjusted, and allow the planning process to occur so they could make some managed progress towards accomplishing what needs to be done. He further stated his desire that each item be brought to the Council and considered for deletion at that time, and not while the total budget is under consideration. Discussion followed regarding the process involved in determining the budget cuts. The City Manager was charged with the effort to bring back as early as possible those plans that begin to turn the deficit into prosperity. MIS SchneiterlMastin to adopt Resolution No. 96-73 approving the 1996-97 Fiscal Year Budget, with those changes as identified and directed toward the staff during the three days Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 14 of budget hearings, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Mayor Schneiter commended the staff for their presentations. Ms. Horsley advised she will be meeting with all employee units in the near future. She queried Council regarding sending out applications for the $20,000 in community funds. Council suggested waiting until later in the year. Councilmember Shoemaker indicated he wished to reconsider his vote at this time, resulting in the following revised roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmember Shoemaker. ABSENT: None. There being no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 3:42 p.m. a:budget.96 Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk Regular Adjourned Meeting June 25-27, 1996 Page 15 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - Special Meeting July 17, 1996 The City Council convened in a special meeting, of which the agenda was legally noticed and posted, at 6:02 p.m. in Conference Room 3 of the Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California. Roll was taken and the following Councilmembers were present: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. Absent: None. Staff present: City Manager Horsley, Planning Director Sawyer, and City Clerk Giuntoli. 2. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS None. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW I. Paul Eveleth Mayor Schneiter introduced Mr. Eveleth to those present and described the interview process. He indicated there is one vacancy and, in addition to the existing pool of applicants, the incumbent Planning Commissioner has re-applied for the position that is expiring. Council queried the applicant relative to his employment with GTE, his two year elected term on Lomita's City Council, and his opinions regarding that city's Planning Commission. Mr. Eveleth replied the only complaint he had regarding Lomita's Planning Commission was the three month period it took for Planning Commission items to come before the City Council. Council further queried the applicant relative to his reasons for applying for the Planning Commission vacancy, and his observations of the community since his arrival in Ukiah in October, 1995. The applicant replied it was his intention to become an involved citizen, but that he had not followed City Council or Planning Commission actions since he had become a resident of the City. His main observations were the lack of available retail space for his expanding business, and the amount of traffic on State Street. Council continued the interview by asking Mr. Eveleth to explain several of his statements on his application related to growth, development, and design review. Mr. Eveleth responded by stating that if a community wants something done and if the project is legal and does not interfere with commerce and the safety of the community, it would be difficult to legislate against preventing what is inevitably going to happen; however, to go forward with growth irrespective of the past and what was formerly accomplished is irresponsible. He further stated that if there is a no growth issue at the Council level, it should also be a no growth issue to the Planning Commission, and they should follow those guidelines. Development often involves a compromise, with the decision meeting the needs of the community as a whole. Design of commercial projects should remain consistent with the area in which it exists; a "mix and match" policy disturbs the continuity of the area. Council referred to the General Plan as being the underlying document used for current zoning and land use policies, and described the four-year process involved with the community in getting it adopted. The applicant was asked where his loyalties would lie in terms of a contested issue with the public, and whether he would rely on the General Plan, his own opinion, or the loudest negative opposition. Mr. Eveleth stated he did not think it fair to use his personal opinion as a basis for decisions. He would base his actions on the safety and welfare of the community, and on the direction that he was given. He would be frustrated to regularly be in a minority position on the voting on planning issues, but would work to resolve the issues and come to some sort of compromise with everyone. Council concluded the interview and thanked the applicant for his interest. 4. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:21 p.m. Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk mn71796.pc Special Meeting -July 17, 1996 Page I MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - July 17, 1996 The City Council convened in a regular meeting of which the agenda was legally noticed and posted, at 6:35 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California. Roll was taken and the following Councilmembers were PRESENT: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. ABSENT: None. Staff Present: Customer Service Supervisor Archibald, Public Utilities Director Barnes, Assistant City Manager Harris, Public Works Director Kennedy, City Manager Horsley, City Attorney Rapport, Planning Director Sawyer, Senior Planner Stump, Executive Assistant Yoast, and City Clerk Giuntoli. 2. INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Assistant City Manager Harris gave the invocation, and Mayor Schneiter led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Adjourned Meeting of June 25-27, 1996 Mayor Schneiter requested approval of the Minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting of June 25-27, 1996 be continued to the regular meeting of August 7, 1996. Regular Meeting of July 3, 1996 M/S MalonelMastin to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 3, 1996, as submitted, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: CouncilmemberWattenburger. ABSENT: None 4. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Mayor Schneiter explained the appeal process. 5. ~:ONSENT CALENDAR MIS MalonelMastin to approve the consent calendar as follows: Denied Claims for Damages Received from Cindi Schiessl; and Chades Knipping; and Refer to City Insurance Carrier, REMIF. Received Report of Disbursements for the Month of June, 1996. Awarded Bid for Sodium Hydroxide Products, in the Amount of $25,926, to Pressure Vessel Service Adopted Resolution No. 97-4, Authorizing Signatories on Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Accounts The motion carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No one came forward. Mayor Schneiter moved Agenda Item 8a to this time, since it was not yet the 7:00 p.m. scheduled hour for the public headng. MIS Malone/Wattenburger to add Urgency Item regarding implementation of an Accelerated Schedule to the Agenda as Item 8a i, carried by an all AYE voice vote. , UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ado;3fion of Report of Alternative Leachate Containment System for Ukiah Landfill. Prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation. and Authorize Public Works Director to Submit Report t~ Regional Water Quality_ Control Board for Consideratigll 8a i. Authorize advertising for bids to implement the Accelerated Schedule as presented by Boyle Engineering Corporation. Public Works Director Kennedy referenced his staff report, and briefly described the project, using an overhead projector to illustrate the Containment System and reconfigurement of the leachate ponds. He cited the need for an accelerated schedule so that completion of the alternative leachate containment system could be completed prior to the end of 1996. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 1 Council queded staff regarding costs, wherein it was noted the costs were estimated at $331,000, of which $329,000 have been budgeted for the project. Further queries related to local surveyors, geotechnical consultants, and the waiver of the three quote requirement. MIS Shoemaker/Malone to adopt the Report of Alternative Leachate Containment System for Ukiah Landfill, Prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation, and Authorize the Director of Public Works to Submit Report to Regional Water Quality Control Board for Consideration, and implement the accelerated schedule, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. pUBLIC HEARING Consideration of Adjusting Rates for City of Ukiah Electric, Water, and Street Lighting Services. i. Adoption of Resolution Increasing Rates for Electric Service ii. Adoption of Resolution Increasing Rates for Water Service iii. Adoption of Resolution Increasing Rates for Street Lighting Charge City Manager Horsley reviewed the pdmary reasons behind the request for the rate adjustments. Public Utilities Director Barnes reported on the need to make the legal requirements of the bond covenant, and called the Council's attention to the fact there has been only one rate increase of 3 1/2% since 1991. The street light fee has remained constant since 1986, and the City has been covering a negative cash balance in this account every year. Council queried Mr. Barnes relative to the bond payment, and the increased costs of purchase power due partially to the increase in the cost of geothermal power. It was noted the basic issue is covedng the bond with the trustees. Discussion followed relative to a chart distributed to the Council illustrating the impacts of all of the proposed utility rate increases on the consumers. It was noted the City's rates are Iow in comparison to other districts, and that the negatives in the budget had been paid out of reserve funds until this year. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 7:17 p.m. John McCowen, PO Box 454, stated that historically, electric rates have always been below Pacific Gas & Electdc (PG&E). The fact the City has taken some financial setbacks in other areas is not a sufficient justification to raise the electdc rates. With the coming of deregulation, the City is sending a signal to their large commercial accounts to change suppliers; the residential users will bear the brunt of the increase. Judy Pruden, 304 South Hortense, cited the history of her utility bills, and stated she did not support the utility rate increase. She further stated she voted against the dam and hydroelectric plant, and voiced concern for the impact the fee increase would have on the elderly. She urged the Council to implement a lesser increase. Patricia Haley, 408 West Barnes Street, stated that when deregulation occurs, the customers of the City's electric utility will not be allowed to switch; this was upsetting to her. She urged the Council to take into consideration those individuals who are Iow income, senior citizens, or on disability. Phil Baldwin, 627 Willow Avenue, stated he was not blaming the Council, since he understands they inherited the problem. However, he expressed concern over discussions not occudng earlier in the year; now it is after the fact. He observed the fees being used as a form of taxation, with the revenue going into the general fund; taxation should be related to the ability to pay. Franchise fees should be $1 instead of $674,000. Al Beltrami, 145 Mendocino Place, representing the Mendocino County Employer's Council, acknowledged the Council's difficult position and the fact the bond covenant was an issue that nothing could be done about. He commented on new businesses in the City that were allowed to come in and were not charged utilities, and Proposition 13, which came about as a result of people's frustration. He recommended the Council reopen the budget; reconsider some issues, including the franchise fees; and consider reducing the rate increases. Jim Kohn, 110 Norton Street, stated his utility bill is much higher than what is shown on the handout, mentioned the Thomas Plaza and the downtown facade program and asked the Council if the City could afford such costly and nice amenities. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 2 Kathy Libby, 1'181 Bush Street, stated she was strongly opposed to the rate increases, and saw them as tax increases to cover large ill-advised expenditures. She suggested the rate increases be put on the November ballot so voters can say what they think of the proposals. Marcia DePriest, 31,5 Pomo Drive, questioned why the ratepayers should be subsidizing private industry, and stated the financing of the Mendocino Brewing Company was an insult to the businesses in the City of Ukiah. She further stated her concerns that new home builders do not get a break on their utilities; there are no underground utilities being installed; the City's streets need to be improved; and her utility bill is "out of sight." She requested a print-out of businesses who had received incentives, and asked if the same incentives had been offered to everyone. She also requested a comparison of rates with other cities of Ukiah's size, and not adjoining water districts.. She stated that Ukiah is in a cdsis and raising the rates is not the answer. Steve Harmon, 825 Pomo Drive, commended City Manager Horsley in her attempts to reduce costs, and stated it was apparent the public members in attendance believed the public utility has been the City's "golden goose." Warren Sawyers, 221 Helen Avenue, voiced his opinions regarding the previous City Manager, the City's financial decisions, the plight of some of the City's small businesses, its senior citizens, and the debt incurred with the construction of the hydroelectric plant. Ron Fryer, 1109 South State Street, voiced his opinions on power failures, the City's electdc equipment, and business incentives. He stated he felt the City should absorb their losses and get out of the electric business, and that it has a "white elephant" on its hands, with deregulation coming in the near future. He further stated his opinion the City did not need the burden of a conference center. Bob Bafia, 404 East Perkins, voiced his concern regarding the power outages, and stated he does not endorse a rate increase. John Mayfield, Ukiah, suggested eliminating the franchise fees and cutting some of the City's expenditures. He questioned the number of staff necessary in the Finance and Planning Departments, recommended the sale of the ambulance business, exploring whether the City can go on the open market for power, and examing the expenditures relative to their actual necessity. He further recommended the budget be examined thoroughly, and that the Council not just arbitrarily raise the rates. Public Hearing Closed: 8:05 p.m. Discussion followed relative to the City's commercial customers and the debt service. Ms. Horsley reported she met with the department heads and had already found $120,000 in cuts that could be made to the budget. She intends to meet with them again examining the ramifications of reducing personnel. The City is looking at privatization options in at least four different areas. She further commented that Redevelopment is a totally different revenue source that has nothing to do with the electdc utility. Any incentives given through the Redevelopment Agency are paid through the Agency; they don't affect electric, which is an Enterprise Fund. Discussion followed regarding the history of the franchise transfer, billing, and franchise costs. Councilmember Malone stated he appreciated the comments from the audience, and that he is a homeowner and small business owner who will bear the increase in the costs also. He acknowledged the Council's responsibility to make sound decisions, but emphasized that none of the Councilmembers are employed full-time in that capacity. He stressed the need for policies addressing individuals on fixed incomes, and advocated income averaging to spread utility costs over a full year. Councilmember Shoemaker commented on the capital expenditures made for equipment in the past few years, and the fact much of the electric revenue has been expended to the Fire Department, Police Department, and Parks. Discussion followed relative to transfer fees, exploring the alternatives for a three-tiered rate for senior and Iow income individuals, conservation, and a pedodic review of the effectiveness of the proposed cost cutting measures to ascertain whether a rate reduction would be in order. MIS MastinlShoemaker to adopt Resolution No. 97-5 authorizing a 12.1% Rate Increase for Electric Service, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: CouncilmemberWattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 3 MIS MalonelMastin to adopt Resolution No. 97-6 authorizing a 15.0% Rate Increase for Water Service, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmember Wattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS MalonelMastin to adopt Resolution No. 97-7 Authorizing an Increase in the Street Lighting Charge from $1.50 to $2.00 per month, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmember Wattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Recessed: 8:35 p.m. Reconvened: 8:40 p.m. 7b. Adoption of Resolution Updating Planning Permit Fees Senior Planner Charles Stump reviewed highlights from the Planning Staff Report, and advised a study was conducted to determine if the City's planning permit fees were adequate in terms of recovering the actual costs of processing development permit applications. The study indicates that Ukiah's planning fees are approximately 40.8% lower than the City of Cloverdale's fees, 22% lower than the fees charged by the City of Willits, and 74% lower than those charged by Mendocino County. Discussion followed wherein it was determined the percentage of time the Planning Department spent on processing permits versus other planning processes was approximately 40% to 50%, and that the proposed fees would recapture 75% of the cost of processing. Further discussion followed regarding fees for boundary line adjustments and appeals. Public Hearing Opened: 8:54 p.m. Judy Pruden, 304 South Hortense, commended the efforts of the Planning Department and stated she had no objection to the increase in the planning fees. However, she felt the large percentage increase should be implemented on an increment basis, with the increase occuring over a two-year period. Al Beltrami, 145 Mendocino Place, questioned the selection of the surveyed jurisdictions and asked what the basis for comparison was. He suggested the Council consider not increasing the fees. Public Hearing Closed: 9:01 p.m. Discussion followed regarding the appeal process and the attached fees. It was the consensus of the Council that there should be a no fee appeals process. Further discussion followed relative to site deposits, hourly fees, tiered and variable rates, and incremental increases. Mr. Stump advised the maximum $450 fee would be reached with each permit application if an hourly fee were instituted. Councilmember Wattenburger stated he had no concerns with the total amount; he would prefer an incremental increase. MIS SchneiterlMalone to adopt Resolution No. 97-8 Updating Planning Permit Fees Pursuant to City Adopted Ordinance 880, with the elimination of the processing fees for appeals, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: CouncilmemberWattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 7c. Introduction of Ordinance Rezoning Various Properties in and Around the Wagenseller Neighborhood, Pursuant to Implementation of the Adopted General Plan Councilmember Shoemaker left the meeting at 9:23 p.m., stating he was a property owner in that area. Mr. Stump advised that Phase Two of the city-wide General Plan rezoning program involves 51 lots situated in what is generally referred to as the Wagenseller Neighborhood. Most of the area is currently assigned a commercial zoning classification, and the new General Plan has designated these parcels as residential to reflect existing development. He further advised the project involves rezoning 22 parcels from "C-2" (Highway Commercial/Restricted Industrial) to "R-3" (General Multiple Family Residential); 3 parcels from "C-1" (Light Commercial) to "R-3" (General Multiple Family Residential); 15 parcels from "C-2" (Highway Commercial/Restricted Industrial) to "R-1" (Sinjle Family Residential). Along North Main and North Mason Streets, 10 parcels are proposed to be rezoned from "R-3 (General Multiple Family Residential) to "C-1" (Light Commercial). Council queried staff on noise corridors and the historical character of the neighborhood. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 4 Public Hearing Opened: 9:24 p.m. John McCowen, PO Box 454, stated there were no objections from property owners when the issue came before the Planning Commission. Judy Pruden, 304 South Hortense, stated she was in strong support of the zoning proposals; the area functions as a neighborhood and is considered heavy residential. The neighborhood was discussed extensively in land use in the General Plan. She urged approval of staff's recommendation. Public Hearing Closed: 9:27 p.m. MIS MastinlMalone to adopt the Negative Declaration for the Wagenseller Neighborhood Rezoning, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Shoemaker. MIS Masfin/Malone to introduce by title only the Ordinance Amending the City Official Zoning Map for the City of Ukiah, carded by an all AYE voice vote by those members present. City Clerk Giuntoli read the Ordinance by title only. MIS WattenburgerlMastin to introduce the Ordinance Rezoning Vadous Properties in and Around the Wagenseller Neighborhood, Pursuant to Implementation of the Adopted General Plan, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: CouncilmemberShoemaker. Councilmember Malone returned to the meeting at 9:30 p.m. 8b. Annual Nomination and Appointment of Commissioners and Board Members i. Planning Commission (1 vacancy) ii. Golf Course Committee (3 vacancies, 1 Required from Parks and Recreation Commission) iii. Parks and Recreation Commission (4 vacancies) iv. Discussion Regarding Readvertising for Two Airport Commission Vacancies Executive Assistant Yoast reviewed the vacant positions on the various Commissions. MIS Mastin/Wattenburger to nominate Judy Pruden to the Planning Commission carded by the following roll call vote. AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS SchneiterlMalone to nominate Faye Hefte to the Golf Course Committee as the Women's Golf Club Representative carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Councilmember Shoemaker passed on his nomination, stating he did not know Elsie Nielson. MIS WattenburgerlMalone to nominate Elsie Nielson to the Golf Course Committee as the Public Member carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS MalonelSchneitar to nominate Jeffrey Anderson, Susan Johnson, Donald Rones, and Michael Woskow to the Parks and Recreation Commission carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS WattenburgerlMastin to adopt Resolution No. 97-9 Making Appointments to the Planning Commission, Golf Course Committee, and Parks and Recreation Commission carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS Masfln/Malone to authorize the City Clerk to readvertise for two Airport Commission vacancies, with applications received forwarded to the City Council on August 21, 1996, carded by an all AYE voice vote. A Motion by Councilmember Malone to direct staff to include on the application whether the applicant would be willing to serve on another committee died for lack of a second. Staff will add the statement to the application. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 5 8c. Matters Concernin0 City_ Treasurer Position i. Introduction of Ordinance Amendinp City_ Treasurer Comr)ensation Mayor Schneiter noted the incorrect date of July 3, 1996 on the proposed ordinance; the correct date for introduction by title only should be July 17, 1996. Al Beltrami, 146 Mendocino Place, stated he had noticed staff had proposed lowering the treasurer's responsibilities, and asked regarding who gave direction to the elected official. He was informed that as an elected official, the position is directly responsible to the electorate, yet operates within the established policies of the City. MIS Wattenburger/Mastin to introduce by title only the Ordinance Amending Section 251, Treasurer, carded by an all AYE voice vote. City Clerk Giuntoli read the ordinance by title only. MIS Wattenburger/Masfin to introduce the Ordinance Amending Section 251, Treasurer, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. ii. Adoration of Resolution Establishinu_ Duties for City_ Treasurer MIS WattenburgerlMalone to adopt Resolution No. 97-10 Establishing Duties and Responsibilities for the City of Ukiah City Treasurer carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 8d. Matters Concerninp City_ Investment_~ i. Amendment of Investment Policy Reflectinp City_ Treasurer Dutie.-- MIS WattenburgerlMalone to approve the amended Investment Policy carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. A_oDroval of A_D_Dlication Deadline and Recruitment for Investment Oversi_ght Committee Public Member MIS WattenburgerlMalone to approve the application deadline and recruitment for Investment Oversight Committee public member carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSTAIN: None. Ce. Discussion and Ar~_Droval of Expansion of City_ Tele_ohone System, A_Dr)roval of Lease Ae_reement with Siemens Credit Comoration. in the Amount of $62.990. and Author!-_-~_Ucn for City_ Mana_eer to Execute Document_-~ Executive Assistant Yoast reported that dudng Budget deliberations funding was approved for expanding the Rolm telephone system, which is currently housed at the Conference Center, to serve the remainder of the City's facilities. Upgrading the telephone system is becoming more and more necessary as the City's 10 year old system cannot keep up with increasing telecommunication needs. The cost will be $1250 per month for five years in addition to maintenance costs. Council queded staff regarding the effects on the dispatch center, how long the transfer would take, and on the system's dependability, maintenance, expandibility, and flexibility. Ms. Yoast replied the system is separate from the dispatch center, and the transfer would occur over a Friday evening, Saturday, and Sunday, with training taking place on Monday and Tuesday. She stated that Director Jenney at the Conference Center is pleased with the system, but advises a sufficient number of training hours should occur. MIS WattanburgerlMasfin to authorize the expansion of the Rolm telephone system, approve the lease agreement with Siemens Credit Corporation, approve the maintenance agreement with Siemens Rolm Communications, Inc., and authorize the City Manager to execute the documents, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Mayor Schneiter moved Agenda Item 8f to follow Agenda Item 12 (Closed Session) Regular Adjoumed Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 6 . NEW BUSINES~ Award of Contract for the Amendment to the Gas Mipration Corrective Action Plan an.I Approval of Budpet Amendment Public Works Director Kennedy offered a summary of his staff report, and used easel drawings to illustrate the perimeter extraction system, which is being used in other landfills. He recommended Alternate #1, which is the elimination of Task #2, the drilling of two gas wells or bores to facilitate the quantification of methane production in the area of violation. He further recommended the Consultant Service Agreement be awarded to Lawrence and Associates. MIS ShoemakerlMastin to award the contract for the Amendment to the Gas Migration Corrective Action Plan to Lawrence and Associates and approve the budget amendment, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. b. Consideration of Parkinq Reaulations in MuniciPal Parkinq Lot- i, Introduction of Ordinance Amendin_u Char~ter 3 of Division 8 of the City_ of Ukiah City_ Code Repulatinp Parkinp in Munici_oal Parkin_u Lot.- City Attorney Rapport advised recent events made him aware of the deficiences in the City's ordinance; this amendment is intended to correct these regulatory problems. MIS Shoemaker/Malone to introduce the ordinance by title only carded by an all AYE voice vote, City Clerk Giuntole read the ordinance by title only. MIS Shoemaker/Malone to introduce the Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of Division 8 of the City of Ukiah Regulating Parking in Municipal Parking Lots, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Ado_ntion of Resolution Establishinp Parkinp Permit Repulations for Munici_Did MIS Shoemaker/Malone to adopt Resolution No. 97-11 Establishing Parking Permit Regulations for Municipal Parking Lots, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 10. CITY COUNCIL/REPORTR Councilmember Masfin reported he and Richard Shoemaker went to Sacramento on behalf of the permit application for the landfill. The decision was "no recommendation and refer to the full board." The next meeting will be held on on July 30 at the Civic Center. He further reported on August 7 he has a meeting scheduled in Laytonville and may be late to that Council meeting. Councilmember Malone reminded the Council that "Chautauqua" will start next week, and that the Train Station Committee and Chamber of Commerce had met with MTA and staff. Mayor Schneiter reported he and Public Utilities Director Barnes will be meeting with NCPA to see if there is some way to work something to help the City with the issue they are struggling with. 11. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT~ The City Manager had no report. The Council recessed to the Redevelopment Meeting at 10:34 p.m. 12. CLOSED SESSION 8f. AD_Droval of A_ureements Between the City_ of Ukiah and Redwood Business Park Owners et al. for Extension of Air_Dort Park Boulevard The Council reconvened in Closed Session at 10:56 p.m. MIS Wattenburger/Malone to extend the Easement Agreement to August 1, 1996, and to extend the tolling pedod in the Agreement until August 8, 1996, carded by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Chairman Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 7 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:21 p.m. Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk a:71796min.3 Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 8 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH -July 17, 1996 The City Council convened in a regular meeting of which the agenda was legally noticed and posted, at 6:35 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California. Roll was taken and the following Councilmembers were PRESENT: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. ABSENT: None. Staff Present: Customer Service Supervisor Archibald, Public Utilities Director Barnes, Assistant City Manager Harris, Public Works Director Kennedy, City Manager Horsley, City Attorney Rapport, Planning Director Sawyer, Senior Planner Stump, Executive Assistant Yoast, and City Clerk Giuntoli. 2. INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCF Assistant City Manager Harris gave the invocation, and Mayor Schneiter led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Adjourned Meeting of June 25-27, 1996 Mayor Schneiter requested approval of the Minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting of June 25-27, 1996 be continued to the regular meeting of August 7, 1996. Regular Meeting of July 3, 1996 MIS MalonelMastin to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 3, 1996, as submitted, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN' CouncilmemberWattenburger. ABSENT: None 4. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Mayor Schneiter explained the appeal process. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR MIS Malone/Mastin to approve the consent calendar as follows: a, b. d. Denied Claims for Damages Received from Cindi Schiessl; and Charles Knipping; and Refer to City Insurance Carrier, REMIF. Received Report of Disbursements for the Month of June, 1996. Awarded Bid for Sodium Hydroxide Products, in the Amount of $25,926, to Pressure Vessel Service Adopted Resolution No. 97-4, Authorizing Signatories on Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Accounts The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No one came forward. Mayor Schneiter moved Agenda Item 8a to this time, since it was not yet the 7:00 p.m. scheduled hour for the public hearing. MIS Malone/Wattenburger to add Urgency Item regarding implementation of an Accelerated Schedule to the Agenda as Item 8a i, carried by an all AYE voice vote. al UNFINISHED BUSINESS Adoption of Report of Alternative Leachate Containment System for Ukiah Landfill, Prepare,~ by Boyle Engineering Corporation, and Authorize Public Works Director to Submit Repor' to Regional Water Quality Control Board for Consideration 8a i. Authorize advertising for bids to implement the Accelerated Schedule as presented by Boylc Engineering Corporation. Public Works Director Kennedy referenced his staff report, and briefly described the project, using an overhead projector to illustrate the Containment System and reconfigurement of the leachate ponds. He cited the need for an accelerated schedule so that completion of the alternative leachate containment system could be completed prior to the end of 1996. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 1 Council queried staff regarding costs, wherein it was noted the costs were estimated at $331,000, of which $329,000 have been budgeted for the project. Further queries related to local surveyors, geotechnical consultants, and the waiver of the three quote requirement. MIS Shoemaker/Malone to adopt the Report of Alternative Leachate Containment System for Ukiah Landfill, Prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation, and Authorize the Director of Public Works to Submit Report to Regional Water Quality Control Board for Consideration, and implement the accelerated schedule, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. . PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of Adjusting Rates for City of Ukiah Electric, Water, and Street Lighting Services. i. ii. iii. Adoption of Resolution Increasing Rates for Electric Service Adoption of Resolution Increasing Rates for Water Service Adoption of Resolution Increasing Rates for Street Lighting Charge City Manager Horsley reviewed the primary reasons behind the request for the rate adjustments. Public Utilities Director Barnes reported on the need to make the legal requirements of the bond covenant, and called the Council's attention to the fact there has been only one rate increase of 3 1/2% since 1991. The street light fee has remained constant since 1986, and the City has been covering a negative cash balance in this account every year. Council queried Mr. Barnes relative to the bond payment, and the increased costs of purchase power due partially to the increase in the cost of geothermal power. It was noted the basic issue is covering the bond with the trustees. Discussion followed relative to a chart distributed to the Council illustrating the impacts of all of the proposed utility rate increases on the consumers. It was noted the City's rates are Iow in comparison to other districts, and that the negatives in the budget had been paid out of reserve funds until this year. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 7:17 p.m. John McCowen, PO Box 454, stated that historically, electric rates have always been below Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). The fact the City has taken some financial setbacks in other areas is not a sufficient justification to raise the electric rates. With the coming of deregulation, the City is sending a signal to their large commercial accounts to change suppliers; the residential users will bear the brunt of the increase. Judy Pruden, 304 South Hortense, cited the history of her utility bills, and stated she did not support the utility rate increase. She further stated she voted against the dam and hydroelectric plant, and voiced concern for the impact the fee increase would have on the elderly. She urged the Council to implement a lesser increase. Patricia Haley, 408 West Barnes Street, stated that when deregulation occurs, the customers of the City's electric utility will not be allowed to switch; this was upsetting to her. She urged the Council to take into consideration those individuals who are Iow income, senior citizens, or on disability. Phil Baldwin, 627 Willow Avenue, stated he was not blaming the Council, since he understands they inherited the problem. However, he expressed concern over discussions not occuring earlier in the year; now it is after the fact. He observed the fees being used as a form of taxation, with the revenue going into the general fund; taxation should be related to the ability to pay. Franchise fees should be $1 instead of $674,000. Al Beltrami, 145 Mendocino Place, representing the Mendocino County Employer's Council, acknowledged the Council's difficult position and the fact the bond covenant was an issue that nothing could be done about. He commented on new businesses in the City that were allowed to come in and were not charged utilities, and Proposition 13, which came about as a result of people's frustration. He recommended the Council reopen the budget; reconsider some issues, including the franchise fees; and consider reducing the rate increases. Jim Kohn, 110 Norton Street, stated his utility bill is much higher than what is shown on the handout, mentioned the Thomas Plaza and the downtown facade program and asked the Council if the City could afford such costly and nice amenities. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 2 Kathy Libby, 1181 Bush Street, stated she was strongly opposed to the rate increases, and saw them as tax increases to cover large ill-advised expenditures. She suggested the rate increases be put on the November ballot so voters can say what they think of the proposals. Marcia DePriest, 315 Pomo Drive, questioned why the ratepayers should be subsidizing private industry, and stated the financing of the Mendocino Brewing Company was an insult to the businesses in the City of Ukiah. She further stated her concerns that new home builders do not get a break on their utilities; there are no underground utilities being installed; the City's streets need to be improved; and her utility bill is "out of sight." She requested a print-out of businesses who had received incentives, and asked if the same incentives had been offered to everyone. She also requested a comparison of rates with other cities of Ukiah's size, and not adjoining water districts.. She stated that Ukiah is in a crisis and raising the rates is not the answer. Steve Harmon, 825 Pomo Drive, commended City Manager Horsley in her attempts to reduce costs, and stated it was apparent the public members in attendance believed the public utility has been the City's "golden goose." Warren Sawyers, 221 Helen Avenue, voiced his opinions regarding the previous City Manager, the City's financial decisions, the plight of some of the City's small businesses, its senior citizens, and the debt incurred with the construction of the hydroelectric plant. Ron Fryer, 1109 South State Street, voiced his opinions on power failures, the City's electric equipment, and business incentives. He stated he felt the City should absorb their losses and get out of the electric business, and that it has a "white elephant" on its hands, with deregulation coming in the near future. He further stated his opinion the City did not need the burden of a conference center. Bob Bafia, 404 East Perkins, voiced his concern regarding the power outages, and stated he does not endorse a rate increase. John Mayfield, Ukiah, suggested eliminating the franchise fees and cutting some of the City's expenditures. He questioned the number of staff necessary in the Finance and Planning Departments, recommended the sale of the ambulance business, exploring whether the City can go on the open market for power, and examing the expenditures relative to their actual necessity. He further recommended the budget be examined thoroughly, and that the Council not just arbitrarily raise the rates. Public Hearing Closed: 8:05 p.m. Discussion followed relative to the City's commercial customers and the debt service. Ms. Horsley reported she met with the department heads and had already found $120,000 in cuts that could be made to the budget. She intends to meet with them again examining the ramifications of reducing personnel. The City is looking at privatization options in at least four different areas. She further commented that Redevelopment is a totally different revenue source that has nothing to do with the electric utility. Any incentives given through the Redevelopment Agency are paid through the Agency; they don't affect electric, which is an Enterprise Fund. Discussion followed regarding the history of the franchise transfer, billing, and franchise costs. Councilmember Malone stated he appreciated the comments from the audience, and that he is a homeowner and small business owner who will bear the increase in the costs also. He acknowledged the Council's responsibility to make sound decisions, but emphasized that none of the Councilmembers are employed full-time in that capacity. He stressed the need for policies addressing individuals on fixed incomes, and advocated income averaging to spread utility costs over a full year. Councilmember Shoemaker commented on the capital expenditures made for equipment in the past few years, and the fact much of the electric revenue has been expended to the Fire Department, Police Department, and Parks. Discussion followed relative to transfer fees, exploring the alternatives for a three-tiered rate for senior and Iow income individuals, conservation, and a periodic review of the effectiveness of the proposed cost cutting measures to ascertain whether a rate reduction would be in order. MIS MastinlShoemaker to adopt Resolution No. 97-5 authorizing a 12.1% Rate Increase for Electric Service, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: CouncilmemberWattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 3 MIS MalonelMastin to adopt Resolution No. 97-6 authorizing a 15.0% Rate Increase for Water Service, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmember Wattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS MalonelMastin to adopt Resolution No. 97-7 Authorizing an Increase in the Street Lighting Charge from $1.50 to $2.00 per month, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmember Wattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Recessed: 8:35 p.m. Reconvened: 8:40 p.m. 7b. Adoption of Resolution Updating Planning Permit Fees Senior Planner Charles Stump reviewed highlights from the Planning Staff Report, and advised a study was conducted to determine if the City's planning permit fees were adequate in terms of recovering the actual costs of processing development permit applications. The study indicates that Ukiah's planning fees are approximately 40.8% lower than the City of Cloverdale's fees, 22% lower than the fees charged by the City of Willits, and 74% lower than those charged by Mendocino County. Discussion followed wherein it was determined the percentage of time the Planning Department spent on processing permits versus other planning processes was approximately 40% to 50%, and that the proposed fees would recapture 75% of the cost of processing. Further discussion followed regarding fees for boundary line adjustments and appeals. Public Hearing Opened: 8:54 p.m. Judy Pruden, 304 South Hortense, commended the efforts of the Planning Department and stated she had no objection to the increase in the planning fees. However, she felt the large percentage increase should be implemented on an increment basis, with the increase occuring over a two-year period. Al Beltrami, 145 Mendocino Place, questioned the selection of the surveyed jurisdictions and asked what the basis for comparison was. He suggested the Council consider not increasing the fees. Public Hearing Closed: 9:01 p.m. Discussion followed regarding the appeal process and the attached fees. It was the consensus of the Council that there should be a no fee appeals process. Further discussion followed relative to site deposits, hourly fees, tiered and variable rates, and incremental increases. Mr. Stump advised the maximum $450 fee would be reached with each permit application if an hourly fee were instituted. Councilmember Wattenburger stated he had no concerns with the total amount; he would prefer an incremental increase. MIS SchneiterlMalone to adopt Resolution No. 97-8 Updating Planning Permit Fees Pursuant to City Adopted Ordinance 880, with the elimination of the processing fees for appeals, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: CouncilmemberWattenburger. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. ?C. Introduction of Ordinance Rezoning Various Properties in and Around the Wagenseller Neighborhood, Pursuant to Implementation of the Adopted General Plan Councilmember Shoemaker left the meeting at 9:23 p.m., stating he was a property owner in that area. Mr. Stump advised that Phase Two of the city-wide General Plan rezoning program involves 51 lots situated in what is generally referred to as the Wagenseller Neighborhood. Most of the area is currently assigned a commercial zoning classification, and the new General Plan has designated these parcels as residential to reflect existing development. He further advised the project involves rezoning 22 parcels from "C-2" (Highway Commercial/Restricted Industrial) to "R-3" (General Multiple Family Residential); 3 parcels from "C-1" (Light Commercial) to "R-3" (General Multiple Family Residential); 15 parcels from "C-2" (Highway Commercial/Restricted Industrial) to "R-I" (Single Family Residential). Along North Main and North Mason Streets, 10 parcels are proposed to be rezoned from "R-3 (General Multiple Family Residential) to "C-1" (Light Commercial). Council queried staff on noise corridors and the historical character of the neighborhood. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 4 Public Hearing Opened: 9:24 p.m. John McCowen, PO Box 454, stated there were no objections from property owners when the issue came before the Planning Commission. Judy Pruden, 304 South Hortense, stated she was in strong support of the zoning proposals; the area functions as a neighborhood and is considered heavy residential. The neighborhood was discussed extensively in land use in the General Plan. She urged approval of staffs recommendation. Public Hearing Closed' 9:27 p.m. MIS Mastin/Malone to adopt the Negative Declaration for the Wagenseller Neighborhood Rezoning, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Shoemaker. MIS Mastin/Malone to introduce by title only the Ordinance Amending the City Official Zoning Map for the City of Ukiah, carried by an all AYE voice vote by those members present. City Clerk Giuntoli read the Ordinance by title only. MIS Wattenburger/Mastin to introduce the Ordinance Rezoning Various Properties in and Around the Wagenseller Neighborhood, Pursuant to Implementation of the Adopted General Plan, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Shoemaker. Councilmember Malone returned to the meeting at 9:30 p.m. 8b. Annual Nomination and Appointment of Commissioners and Board Members i. Planning Commission (1 vacancy) ii. Golf Course Committee (3 vacancies, 1 Required from Parks and Recreation Commission) iii. Parks and Recreation Commission (4 vacancies) iv. Discussion Regarding Readvertising for Two Airport Commission Vacancies Executive Assistant Yoast reviewed the vacant positions on the various Commissions. MIS Mastin/Wattenburger to nominate Judy Pruden to the Planning Commission carried by the following roll call vote. AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS SchneiterlMalone to nominate Faye Hefte to the Golf Course Committee as the Women's Golf Club Representative carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Councilmember Shoemaker passed on his nomination, stating he did not know Elsie Nielson. MIS WattenburgerlMalone to nominate Elsie Nielson to the Golf Course Committee as the Public Member carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS MalonelSchneiter to nominate Jeffrey Anderson, Susan Johnson, Donald Rones, and Michael Woskow to the Parks and Recreation Commission carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS WattenburgerlMastin to adopt Resolution No. 97-9 Making Appointments to the Planning Commission, Golf Course Committee, and Parks and Recreation Commission carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. MIS MastinlMalone to authorize the City Clerk to readvertise for two Airport Commission vacancies, with applications received forwarded to the City Council on August 21, 1996, carried by an all AYE voice vote. A Motion by Councilmember Malone to direct staff to include on the application whether the applicant would be willing to serve on another committee died for lack of a second. Staff will add the statement to the application. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 5 ac. Matters Concerning City Treasurer Position i_ Introduction of Ordinance Amendin~l City Treasurer Compensation Mayor Schneiter noted the incorrect date of July 3, 1996 on the proposed ordinance; the correct date for introduction by title only should be July 17, 1996. Al Beltrami, 145 Mendocino Place, stated he had noticed staff had proposed lowering the treasurer's responsibilities, and asked regarding who gave direction to the elected official. He was informed that as an elected official, the position is directly responsible to the electorate, yet operates within the established policies of the City. MIS WattenburgerlMastin to introduce by title only the Ordinance Amending Section 251, Treasurer, carried by an all AYE voice vote. City Clerk Giuntoli read the ordinance by title only. MIS Wattenburger/Mastin to introduce the Ordinance Amending Section 251, Treasurer, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES' None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. ii. Adoption of Resolution Establishing Duties for City Treasurer MIS Wattenburger/Malone to adopt Resolution No. 97-10 Establishing Duties and Responsibilities for the City of Ukiah City Treasurer carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 8d. Matters Concerning City Investments i. Amendment of Investment Policy Reflecting City Treasurer Duties MIS WattenburgerlMalone to approve the amended Investment Policy carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. ii. Approval of Application Deadline and Recruitment for Investment Oversioht Committee Public Member MIS Wattenburger/Malone to approve the application deadline and recruitment for Investment Oversight Committee public member carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSTAIN: None. Se. Discussion and Approval of Expansion of City Telephone System, Approval of Leasc Aqreement with Siemens Credit Corporation, in the Amount of $62,990, and Authorization for City Manager to Execute Documents Executive Assistant Yoast reported that during Budget deliberations funding was approved for expanding the Rolm telephone system, which is currently housed at the Conference Center, to serve the remainder of the City's facilities. Upgrading the telephone system is becoming more and more necessary as the City's 10 year old system cannot keep up with increasing telecommunication needs. The cost will be $1250 per month for five years in addition to maintenance costs. Council queried staff regarding the effects on the dispatch center, how long the transfer would take, and on the system's dependability, maintenance, expandibility, and flexibility. Ms. Yoast replied the system is separate from the dispatch center, and the transfer would occur over a Friday evening, Saturday, and Sunday, with training taking place on Monday and Tuesday. She stated that Director Jenney at the Conference Center is pleased with the system, but advises a sufficient number of training hours should occur. MIS WattenburgerlMastin to authorize the expansion of the Rolm telephone system, approve the lease agreement with Siemens Credit Corporation, approve the maintenance agreement with Siemens Rolm Communications, Inc., and authorize the City Manager to execute the documents, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES' None. ABSTAIN' None. ABSENT: None. Mayor Schneiter moved Agenda Item 8f to follow Agenda Item 12 (Closed Session) Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 6 Si NEW BUSINESS Award of Contract for the Amendment to the Gas Migration Corrective Action Plan ant' A_~_~roval of Budget Amendment Public Works Director Kennedy offered a summary of his staff report, and used easel drawings to illustrate the perimeter extraction system, which is being used in other landfills. He recommended Alternate #1, which is the elimination of Task #2, the drilling of two gas wells or bores to facilitate the quantification of methane production in the area of violation. He further recommended the Consultant Service Agreement be awarded to Lawrence and Associates. MIS ShoemakerlMastin to award the contract for the Amendment to the Gas Migration Corrective Action Plan to Lawrence and Associates and approve the budget amendment, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. bi Consideration of Parking Repulations in Municipal Parking Lots i_ Introduction of Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of Division 6 of the City of Ukiah City Code Regulating Parking in Municipal Parking Lot-= City Attorney Rapport advised recent events made him aware of the deficiences in the City's ordinance; this amendment is intended to correct these regulatory problems. MIS Shoemaker/Malone to introduce the ordinance by title only carried by an all AYE voice vote. City Clerk Giuntole read the ordinance by title only. MIS Shoemaker/Malone to introduce the Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of Division 8 of the City of Ukiah Regulating Parking in Municipal Parking Lots, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Adoption of Resolution Establishing Parking Permit Regulations for Municipal Parking Lots MIS Shoemaker/Malone to adopt Resolution No. 97-11 Establishing Parking Permit Regulations for Municipal Parking Lots, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 10. CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS Councilmember Mastin reported he and Richard Shoemaker went to Sacramento on behalf of the permit application for the landfill. The decision was "no recommendation and refer to the full board." The next meeting will be held on on July 30 at the Civic Center. He further reported on August 7 he has a meeting scheduled in Laytonville and may be late to that Council meeting. Councilmember Malone reminded the Council that "Chautauqua" will start next week, and that the Train Station Committee and Chamber of Commerce had met with MTA and staff. Mayor Schneiter reported he and Public Utilities Director Barnes will be meeting with NCPA to see if there is some way to work something to help the City with the issue they are struggling with. 11. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS The City Manager had no report. The Council recessed to the Redevelopment Meeting at 10:34 p.m. 12. 8f. CLOSED SESSION Approval of Agreements Between the City of Ukiah and Redwood Business Park Owners et al, for Extension of Airport Park Boulevar~ The Council reconvened in Closed Session at 10:56 p.m. MIS Wattenburger/Malone to extend the Easement Agreement to August 1, 1996, and to extend the tolling period in the Agreement until August 8, 1996, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Chairman Schneiter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 7 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:21 p.m. Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk a:71796min.3 Regular Adjourned Meeting July 17, 1996 Page 8 CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 August 7, 1996 6:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance 3. Special Order of Business a. Introduction of Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, Elizabeth Brazil 4. Approval of Minutes i. Regular Adjourned Meeting of June 25-27, 1996 (continued) ii. Special Meeting of July 17, 1996 iii. Regular Meeting of July 17, 1996 . RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure which generally limits to ninety (90) days the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 6, CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Report of Disbursements for the Month of July 1996 b. Adoption of Ordinance Amending City Treasurer Compensation c. Adoption of Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of Division 8 of the City of Ukiah City Code Regulating Parking in Municipal Parking Lots d. Approve Project Change Orders and Release of Retention to Pacific Mechanical Corporation and Authorize the City Clerk to Publish a Notice of Completion Relative to Work Performed During the Construction of the Advanced Wast,water Treatment Facility e. Approval of Budget Amendment for Expenditures Relative to Tree Trimming Services f. Authorization for Pay Freightliner Enterprise Corporation/American LaFrance Fire Apparatus, in the Amount of $51,824.28, for Repair to Fire Department Aerial Ladder Truck g. Declaration of Surplus Property and Authorize the Purchasing Officer to Solicit Bids and Dispose of Property if No Bids are Received h. Receive Report of the Acquisition of Cataphote Powder for Traffic Marking Applications i. Award of Consultant Service Contract to Lawrence and Associates, in the Amount of $25,764, to Construct Five Gas Monitoring Wells j. Notification to Council Regarding Purchase of Liquid Aluminum Chlorhydroxide The City of Uklah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate Individuals with disabilities upon request k. Authorize the Mayor to Execute Service Schedule No. One to the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement Relating to the Identified Power Sale to Shelter Cove Resort Improvement District No. One .. I. Adoption of Policy Resolution Modifying Policy Resolution No. 25 Regarding Reimbursement of Expenses for Elected and/or Appointed City Officials, Officers, and Employees m. Approve Legal Publishing Services as Submitted by Ukiah Daily Journal for Fiscal Year 1996/97 n. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Application for Federal Excess Property in Accordance with Title IV, Rural Development Act 1972 . AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEM~ The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. . UNFINISHED BUSINESS_ a. Adoption of Ordinance Rezoning Various Properties in and Around the Wagenseller Neighborhood, Pursuant to Implementation of the Adopted General Plan b. Approval of Agreements Between the City of Ukiah and Redwood Business Park Owners, et al, for Extension of Airport Park Boulevard 9. NEW BUSINESS a. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Sections 2580 and 2581 of the Ukiah City Code to Require Drug and Alcohol Testing of Taxi Cab Drivers b. Presentation of Final Report for Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study c. Adopt Resolution Establishing No Parking Zone on Both Sides of South State Street from 200 Feet North of Mill Street to 250 Feet South of Hastings Avenue d. Introduction of Ordinance Amending §101 of the Ukiah Municipal Code Relative to City Manager Position 10. 11. 12. CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS CLOSED SESSION a. Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Anticipated Litigation - Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 (1 case) 13. ADJOURNMENT The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate Individuals with disabilities upon request ITEM NO. 6a DATE Aueust _7,, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 Payments made during the month of July 1996, are summarized on the attached Report of Disbursements. Further detail is supplied on the attached Schedules of Bills, representing the four (4) individual payment cycles within the month. Accounts Payable check numbers: 89238-89304, 89503-89596, 89783-89956 and 77412-77414 Payroll check numbers: 88974, 88975, 89115, 89116, 89305-89500, 89501, 89502, 89597-89782 Direct Deposit numbers: 75 to 162 This report is submitted in accordance with Ukiah City Code Division 1, Chapter 7, Article 1. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Report of Disbursements for the month of July 1996. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Candace Horsley, City Manager Prepared by: Gordon Elton, Director of Finance Coordinated with: Kim Sechrest, Accounts Payable Specialist Attachments: Report of Disbursements Candace Horsley, City M r AGENDA.WPD/krs CITY OF UKIAH REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS REGISTER OF PAYROLL AND DEMAND PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 Demand Payments approved: Check No. 89238-89304, 89503-89596, 89783-89956, 77412-77414 FUNDS: 100 General Fund $109,293.64 652 120 Capital Improvement 663 150 Civic Center Construction $3,814.12 665 141 Museum Grants 670 142 National Science Foundation $1,200.00 675 200 Asset Seizure Fund $1,402.26 678 220 Parking Dist. Rev. Fund $519.19 680 230 Parking Dist. #1 Rev. Fund 693 260 Downtown Business Improv. 695 300 Gas Tax $1,244.51 696 301 Gas Tax Fund (2107) 697 320 Airport Clear Zone Fund 698 332 Federal Emergency Grant 800 335 Comm. Dev. Comm. Fund 805 405 Youth Services Ukiah $299.96 820 410 Conference Center Fund $6,864.03 920 550 Lake Mendocino Bond $4,951.00 910 575 Garage $10,241.26 900 600 Airport $15,960.33 940 618 Flood Damages $4,644.78 950 611 Sewer Construction Fund $3,700.00 960 612 City/District Sewer $10,624.09 962 610 Sewer Service Fund ($296.97) 965 640 San Dist Revolving Fund 966 660 Sanit. Disp. Site ($36,930.46) 555 ReDip Sewer Enterprise Fund Countywide JPA Refuse/Debris Control U.S.W. Billing & Collections Contracted Dispatch Services Public Safety Dispatch Ambulance Service Clubhouse Renovations Golf Warehouse/Stores Billing Enterprise Fund Fixed Asset Fund Electric Street Lights Water Liability Fund Worker's Comp. Fund Special Deposit Trust Payroll Posting Fund General Service Community Redev. Agency Redev. Housing Fund Redev. Capitol Imprv. Fund Redevelopment Debt Svc. Lake Mendocino Bond Reserve PAYROLL CHECKS NO. 88974-88975, 89115-89116, 89305-89500 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS 75 TO 117 PAYROLL PERIOD 6/16/96 to 6/29/96 PAYROLL CHECKS NO. 89501-89502, 89597-89782 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS 118 TO 162 PAYROLL PERIOD 6/30/96 to 7/13/96 TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS TOTAL PAYROLL DED. CHECKS TOTAL PAYROLL CHECKS TOTAL DIRECT DEPOSIT TOTAL PAYMENTS $12.00 $122,925.52 $3,081.28 $1,517.52 $13,378.67 $36,910.75 $11,677.75 $40,876.12 $10,920.92 $39,194.31 $57.60 $29,423.14 $81,401.57 $1,314.23 $42,557.28 $6,787.12 $1,670.55 $581,238.07 $176,287.65 $302,350.16 $97,596.54 $1,157,472.42 CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK This register of Payroll and Demand Payments was duly approved by the City Council on City Clerk APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER I have examined this Register and approve same. CERTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I have audited this Register and approve for accuracy and available funds. City Manager Director of Finance 0 m ~0000~0~0~0~00~0~000~0 O~ U U 0 0 ~0 ~H © C 0 C ©U ~H 0 U O~ H CCCCC© < ~0 © u'~ u"~ U"l oo o 000 oo ooo · 0 0 oc) o · , 0 · , 0 0 0 · · 0 0 o Oo · , o o o o o o 0000 0000 o o o ~ ,~- · o 1~0 o ~ o o 0'~ o ~-~ o ~00 ~ t~ O00~o~O~ o ooo~o 00~0 ooo~o o000o ooooo ooooo I I I ...,,. ,,,~ ,~,,,. I I I ooo ooo ooo ooo o 00 00 o m:,, .~ -.4 o o i.-~ t.-~ ~I.~ i-~ 1--~ ~ ~.-~ t-~ O'h 0"~ dh ~ 0'1 O~ 0'~ O00 0 0 0 0 00 O00 0 0 0 0 O0 O00 0 0 0 0 O0 oooo o0oo oooo 00000 00000 00000 00000 O~ >0 XX © 0 000~ © o C < 0~0 0 oo -,.1H o~ ~0 tD 0 0~ ~00 ZZ o o · 0 ©o · o o o o o o o o o .,4 o o · · 0 0 o o o o C · · 0~ 0~ H mm H ~ · O0 , 0 0000 0 0000 0 ° o ~oo o ~oo o ooo · o ooo o ooo o ooo o U t~ 0 C~Oh 00 00 00 I I Ch 0"~ O0 00 O0 O0 ~00 OkO~D -4O(4 000 000 ~0 Ua 0'~ CO CDC) C) ~--~ i--~ .r,,...~ 0'~ ~ 00 O0 00 · -40'~ 0 0 © ©© << < [nO 0 0 ~11 oD c0 c0 ooo ooo · , L~O0 . . · , 000 O00 000 ~ o ~ o ~ ~oo ooo ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~0o ~ ~ m ~ 0~~ O~H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ooo oo o ~ o o o oooo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~oo ~ o o o ~ o0~ O0 ,, o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~oo o ~ o ~ ~ ~oo ~ ~ o o O0 oo ,, o o o o o~ oo o o 0 o ~ oo o o o o o~ oo ~o ~o ~o 0~ 000 o~. ~o · , ooo o0o O~H 0~ I--I H 00 · 00 · 00 00 00 O0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 O0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 O0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 O0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0000 ~0 ooo ooo ooo 00o oo oo o o u'~ ~0 0 HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. ~0 0 g° 0 ~-~1 O~ ~<0 < ~0 H 0 oo o~< L~ ~O o © ~222222222~222222~2222 ~~~000~~0~00000000 ~~000~00~~0~0000000000 ~~0000~~~00~0~00~0~ ~~~~000~0~0~000~0~ 0000~0000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 ~0~000000000000000000000000 0~ 0~ u~ Ln Ln 09O0(20 000 · 0 · · , 000 000 000 0 000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 ~~oooo~5o~ooooo ooo ooo ooo hoN.)N) O O H ::1:1::: ¢" '"'" ',D Cn .,,4 1'9 -,4 I .,.q o~ O0 00~ © < ~0 0 o© o~ ~0 0, ~ ~ ~z o 0 ~ 0~ ~ ~ O~ 000 0 ~ 00 0 O0 · .. 0.. ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ O~ 0 ~ O~ 0~ .. ... ~ ~ O0 000 ,. 0.. 0 0 O0 000 0 0 O0 000 0 0 00 0 O0 000 000 ~ ~ 000 ~ 000 ~ 000 ~ 0 0~0 O0  0 ~., O0 ~ O0 O0 O0 .. ~ O0 O0 ~0 · ' 0 . ~0 0 .0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 0 00~0 · . 0~ ,~ ~, O0 · O0 · O0 · O0 00 00 ~-~ I-~ 0 C,nU'~ Cnl~O 000 0 (,4 0 0 O0 000 0 0 O0 000 0 0 O0 000 00 (4(4 CO CO I I 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 O0 0 © o~ C C 00000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 C 000 000 ~0 0 o© o~ ~0 o, ~ 0 ~ 0000 O0 0 0 0000 O0 0 0 0000 O0 ~ ~ 00~ ~0 0 0 0000 0 0 ~ 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 ~ 0 0000 0 0 0 0000 0~~000~~00~00000000 00000000~~00~0000000 ~0~0~~~000~0~00~ ~~0~0~0000~000~0~0 ~0~~00~0~~~0~ 000~00000~00~000000~0 0000~000000000000000000 0000~000000000000000000 0000~00000000000000000~ ~0 o o o o · ~ o O, o O0 0 0 0000 O0 0 0 0000 O0 0 0 0000 ~ ~ ~ ~0~ U'~ GnD"~U'~ Cn(.n C,nC.n(.,nbn U'~ bnU'~ 00000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 (..n c.n co oD o o o o o o OO oo ,r,,..~ O~ ~0 O~ O~ 0 ~-0 0 O~ © < 00~ · . oo o o I,,3 h5 o o oo oo H~HOZ 00o0 oNo Z~ © 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 < ~0 0 o~ >o H < 0 0 © 00 0 C 0 oo ~0 00 i...q © ~ ~ H ¢ c) oo ooo~oo~oo~oo~oo U H ~ U U < U~ ~U H © oo · .4 ~ ~0 0, l-q 0 0 ~ o o o o ~o o o o o oooo · · 0 · 0 , · · ~ ~ o~oo ~ ~ .... o o oooo · · . 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0000 0000 ~000 ~ o~ ~00~ 0000 0000 ~00~ ~00~ 0~ 0~ mm O0 ooo · · · o o 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0000 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ooo0 000 0 CD 0 O00 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 I--~ I--~ I--~ 0 0 0 t-~ 0 l'O ~0 O0 ,.4 ooo ooo ooo ooo ooo o oo ooo ooo o o o o o o ~0c0 o~ ~o ~0 Om <~ 0 0 ~JO O~ 0 000~ ~0 0 © 0 00~ © 0 < ~0 O~ © ~0 ~0~ 0 oo0 0oo · 0 · 0 ooo ~ o~ · . t-~ o ~_~ 000 OZZ o o oo · S~88oo ~ ~ oo§888o8°°oo8 ~00 0~00~0~ H~ H H H~ ~ H o~oo ~ooo o~oooo~oooooo ~oo~~o~o~o ~o~~oo~o~o~ o~ooooooooooooo oo0oo0ooooooooo OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 000000000000000 Cn 0'~ 0 N) O'~ I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 O0 O0 O0 OO0000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000 © 0~] ~0 H~ XXX~ 0 O0 ~0 U ~H> 000000~ ©©~ 000000 O0 o~m~ ~ZHHH ~ 0 < (no 0 0000000 0000000 0000 <~ o © om~m u'l u1 (..n ooo · , ooo · 0 · 0 ooo 00o ooo o o o o o ~ o~0o~ o ~ oo~0o~ <~ ~ ooo >> 0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 0~0~00 ~ O0 0 ~ ~00~ ~ '' ~000 O0 0 o o o ~000 ~000 ~0~ ~00~ '~0 0~ 000 000 000 000 0000000 0000000 0000000 ~~0~ 000 000 000 I ,,4 o ,..4 00 o'1 -,4 o o o o o o IIIIII 000000 0 O0 000000 0 O0 000000 0 O0 000000 0 O0 000000 0000 0000 ~0~ © O~ >0 *0 0 cc O0 0000000000 0000000000~ C O0 ~ ~ O0 ~ 0 4::.-.4,.4 000 · , 000 000 <~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o oo ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ o OO ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~o 0 oo ~ "-- . o~ · '' ~ o0 ~ .. ~ ~ o ~ oo ~ ~ o OO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo .0 .. o oo o oo o oo o oo o oo o oo 0~~ooooo o~o~ooooo ~~oo~ ~o~o0o~ ~o~o~oo~ ~0~o~~ 000~00000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 ~~oooo Z ~~0oo0 ~ ~o~~ C ooooooo OOOOOOO OOOOOOO OOOOOOO I~1-~ 01ol ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo o oo o o oo o OO o oo o o oo o oo o oo o o oo o oo o oo ~ ~ ~ ~ OO HHHHHHHHHH 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000 0000000 0000000 © o~ o I o o'/ o 0 © < u~ ~o o O~ HHHHHH~HHHHHHHHHHH ~~00000000000000 ~0~000000000000000 ~0~~0000000000 0~0000~0~~~~ 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000~00 0 ~D 0 OD 0 ~) 0 ~oo~ ~ ~ o>>~ ~ ~ x ~0 0 ~ 0 ~0 0 ~ 0 0 0.. 0 , ~0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 00" ~ ~ ~ . · . ~ 00~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ .0 O0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0~ 0"~ (.,n 0'~ ooo i~ i.~ i.~ · . · , ooo ooo ooo · , ~)~) oo c000 · o o oo o o o o 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 t,-~ ~,-~ ~--~ O~ O~ 0'~ 000 000 000 000 O0 O0 O0 -4--4 0'~ 0'~ 00 00 00 O0 O~ >o 0 0 ~0~0 00~ ~ 0 ~0 0~ ~0 ~0 0~ ~t~ ~0 ~0 ~0 © © ~ < ~0 ~0 M~O 0 oo ~0 o oo~ o ~oo~ o oo~ o oooo -- ~--~---- ~ ~000 O U0~ C OCO0 ~ mmm Z ~~ H HHH ~ H~ HH ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 ooo o oooo o ooo o oooo ~ o 0~00 ~ 0oo ..... 0 0 ~0~ ~ 0 000 0 000 0 000 0 000 0~0~ 000~ ~0 000~ 0000 0000 0000 ° oo~) oo.,..4 · . 0 · , o 0 0000 0 000 0 0000 0 000 0 0000 0 000 0000 0000 0000 ~0~ 0'~ O~ 0'~ 0'~ 0'~ 0'~ 000 000 000 I',O ~.-~ 0 O~ O0 ~. H 0 ~ ~H ~ ~0 ~ O~ H H 0 ~0000000000~ D"JH H ~0 O~ © Z 0 000~ ©© · · 00000 ...,. ~00 00000 00~ coco oo 0~ oo o o oo o oo o 00 0 0 0 , 00 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 00 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 O0 0~0~0~00~ ~00~0~0 00000000000 ~ o oooooo 00000000000 00~00~0~0 00~00~0~0 00~00~0~0 ooo ooo 0~ 0 · · · 0 o o 0~ · · 0 , 00000 CO CID 00000 O0 0 O0 0 0 00000 O0 0 O0 0 0 00000 O0 0 O0 0 0 00000000000 00000000000 00000000000 ~0~0000~ oo o o oo o o o o o o oo oo L~O ~0 0 (DO ~o~~0oooo oooo~ooooo0 ~~o~oo o~ooooooooo o~o~o~o~o ~oo~oo~o~ 00000000000 00000000000 00000000000 · 0 © H ~) ~ ~ o o o · , o o o o · o o o o o o HHH~HHHH HHHHH~ H 00~0~0~000~0~ 00~00~0000000000 00~~~0~~0~ 00~~0~0~000 ~0~000~~~ 0000~0000000000~ 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ~00000000~000000 o 0 o o -4 o o o o o o 0oooooooooo ooooooooooo ooooooooooo o o o o oo oooo0ooooooooooo oooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooo © o~ I H ~0 ~'0 O0 © < ~0 0 o~n.~ 0~ }..q · · · 0 0~ ~ H mm t-~ I_~ o o o o · o o · . o o · . o o o o o o 0 © oo oo o o IN) 0 0 0 0 0'~ 0'~ (.d 0 I I 0 0 i~ ~-~ ~ i.~ 0'~ 0'~ CO C0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ I.~ I.~ 1~ 0'~ ~ O~ 0'~ 0'~ CO O0 CO ~D CO 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 ',,D CO ~ C.n 0'~ O~ ~ O0 CO CO 000 ooo ooo ooo o o ~-~ ~ 0'~ 0'~ -.4-.4 o o OO oo 0'~ 0~ O0 ~ << o HHHHHHH 0~0 0 HC < © o(3 ~0 (.~ 00 c,n o o (.,n h3 o o oo o ~ ~'~ U H H H ~ o o ~ ~ o oo0 CD 0% · 0 0 0 O00 0 0 000 0 0 O00 H HH~) H H~) H ooo ;;;o 00000000 OOOOOOOO ~0~0~ 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ~00 © (2O CO OO · , O O · 0 ~ 0 O~ ~oo ooooo~ ~oo0~ o~~o 00000~ 000000 000000 0o~o~o oo0oo 00000 00000 00000 0 0 000 0 0 O00 0 0 000 ,r,,. ~ 00000000 00000000 00000000 o o o o o 0 ~.~ ~ o 0ooooo oooooo oo0ooo ooooo oo0oo ooo0o © O~ ~o ~ < OZZ~ ~ m~ 0 ~ ~H O0 0 ©© ooo · , 000 · . c,n f,.,n o · 0 0 ooo ooo ooo ooo oo o ooo O~n < ~o © U O' H OH ~ o© ~0 oo 0 U U i ~-~ O~ U 0 ©0 o> <o ~ ~o > Z < [nO ~d © o© o ,,.4 ,,,4 · 0 · o u.'] u"~ © oo oo · 0 o o · 00 cid (Do o o . cdc) (DO O0 ~o~ · 0 · o o o o · 0 o o o o , · o o · o o o o co cn o -4 o ~ · · , U~ta Om~ ~Q o o o o · . o · o , o o o o 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 ~0 "dO O~ ~© © < eo © oo ~0 OO~U~ 0~ ~ I I ~-~ H H ~d 0 0 · · ~000 00000 O~ 0~00 0000 · , , 0~00 000 · , · ~0~ 0000 0000 o · 0 ooo ©~ << , 0 · O0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 G~ U,) .r,, ~ FO 0 ~ O0 --4 ooo ooo ['ON) FO ~, I o 0h ~ o o o o o © H 0 O0 0 CC oO ~0 0 < *0 < o~ 0 o© ~0 © 0 ~ c) ~ · o o 00 C 0 o C o 0 0 o OOOO · ~ . O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O ~-~ (.4 -4-4-.4 OOO OO O O O O OOO O O O (DOC) O O O ~-~O O O k--~ O t,D 0O -.4 0'~ oooo oooo oooo © oH ~O H HHHHH < ~0 © o© ~0 oo ~.q O0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000 X ~0 ~~ ~~ 00~00~~ ~ ~00 ~~ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 888888ooggg8oooggggggg8oooooggggggggooogg o O0 000 00000 000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O~H~ · , ~-~oo · 0 , qD k.O o , . . ooo ooo oooooooo0ooo0oo00ooo0ooooooo~~~~~ ~ oooooooooooooooo0oooo0ooo0oo~o~o~~~ ~ oo8888°° ooggggggg°° ooggggggggg°°°°ggggggggg°°oooo o oo oo -..40.)O ooo ooo u-~ .r,,.. 0-~ © o~] >0 0 ~0 O0 ~Z OO ~0 O~ OQ ~0 0 O~ ~0 O© 0 0 ~U ~0 I o < 0 Z o 0 <<< 0oo < eO o~ © oo ~] '~0 o ~ ~Z o o cD o o o o , <~a 0~~ 0000 OM~ ~0~0 000~ .... 0000 .... 0000 0000 0000 << XX o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ©000 ~000 oooo oooo oooo o~ ~0 C < ~0 c~m mO mO 000~ 000~ ~]0 ~tO O0 © © ~0 © < ~U ~0 ~U © oo ~0 tom o ~ ~ o o~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o o~ ~ o ~ o H ~ © 0 0 ~ o o ooo ~ o o o o o ooo ~ o o o · · . ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o o · o '~ ~ o o ~ · o . . o o ~ oo o o · . o ~ oo o o o o ~ oo o o o 0 ~ oo o ~ o X ~d 0 o 0 o 0~ H © , 0 · · · 0 0 c0 o o o o o o G0 ,,4-.4.,4 I~ 000 ~ I-~ I I I o o o o I,~ CD 0 ,r,,. 0 ,r,,. ~ 0 (.4 0 ~ ~ 4',,. ~ -,4 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 -,4-,4-4 000 O00 000 k.~O 0 O~)CO CD 0 00 00 0 CD · ,-40'~ © o~ O~ © < ~0 © oo ~0 0~ o rD · · rD 0 , ~C~CC 0 ~0~0 ~0~ 0 ~0~ · . . . ~0 ~ O~ ~ .... 0000 0000 Or.a~ oo o o · . CD 0% ~-~0 · . · 0 ~:~ ,~ o · 0 0 c0 c0o ~(~o 0~ 0~< · , , 0 ~ O0 HHHH 0000 0000 0000 , , , 0000 0000 · . 0 0000 0000 0000 00 00 00 4,,,,. 4~ 0000 0000 0000 -,4,.4 ~0~) O0 00 00 ~.~ ,.~ 00 O0 O0 c~ 0'~ 0'~ ooo ooo o0o ooo ooo 0000 0000 0000 ~0~ © O~ 0 0~< HO U H O~ *0 © ~0 ~0 < [nO ~u ~Z © ~~ ~ o ~ ~ o o o~oo ~ o © o o ~ ~~ ~ o o ~ o ~ 0 ~~ ~ 0 X ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~0~0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 · ... ~ · . oooo o o o o ~ .... oooo o o o o o oooo o o o o o oooo ~ o o o o ~000 0~ 0~ , o · , 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 -.4 -..] 000 000 000 © O~ < ~0 0 oo ~0 o ~ © 0 cD , ~ o~] · o o ~ o~ ~0 OU~ © 0 ~0 ~0 o~ O0 O~D < ~nO O~ © oo ~0 0 0 0 0 0 0'~ ~ 0 I-~ 0 0 0 0 0 1',3 --4 0 ~D 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O~ 0 ~ 0~ o}} ~ H ~-~ ~ o o o o · · , o o · o o o o o o ooo ~H O~ 0 C~C,n O-4 · 0 CO 0 0 · · 0 0 O0 O0 4,,. CO (.,n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO (:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (.4O © O~ ~0 ©©0~ O0 OHO ~0 ~0 O~ H ~0 ~0 0 00~ 0 < MC] ~0 © o© ~0 ~o~ ,0 ooo ooo · 0 ooo · . oo cn · , ooo ooo 0~ ~'~ H H H ~ oo oo . . r,,,. ~. · 0 o o · o o oo o o O~HH ©© 00 ooo ooo · . oo o cno o o 0 o o · o o o o ~0~00~~0~00 000~00~0~00~0000 000~~00000~0~ 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 O~ ooo ooo OOK) ooo o oo o ooo o oo o 0oo o oo o ooo ~ ~ ~ COCO(Z} 0 O00 0 000 0 O00 O~PCO 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 00000000©0000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 O~ ~o H o ~o o 0 · 0 ©© 0 < o~ o oo ~0 0~ ~0 co o o · o 0 · o o · o o o o o o 0~ ~ i F-q I.-I · 0 · · 0000000~ 00~ 00000~0 00~ o ~0~0~00 ~0~0~00 00~0~00 ,,0.,,, 0000000 0000000 ~0 o I ~ooo 0~ 0~ 0'~ 0'~ ooo ooo i-~ t--~ ~-~ · . · . oo0 ooo ooo 0'~ 0'~ o o ~OD I'~ 00 00 00 co c0 0'~ 0~ o o o o o o 0000000 0000000 0000000 00~~ C~O~ 000 000 000 ~C~ I.-.~ k-~ CO CD 0'~ 0'~ 0'~ 000 000 000 000 © o~ >o ~0 O~U O0 0 ~0 0 O© 0 ~ H © © H 0 q< ©. < U~ ~U ~0 0 O~H 0~~ oo~0 o oo~o o ~ooo · . , 0 o~o~ ~o~o o ooo0 o oooo o oooo o oo0 · , ~0'~o U 0'.4 · 0 · 0 0~000 o ooo ooooooo · , , 0 , 0 0 oo~ooo oo~ooo ooooooo ooooooo ooooooo ~ooo~ LC) 0 · . 0 LDOLD O~ , 0000 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000000 0000000 0000000 ~0~~ o o o o 0'~ 0~ o o o o o o o~ 00000000000000000000000000000000~ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~ ~0 0 < r~o O~ © ~0 o"1 o .-.J o 0 ~ o o 0 0 · o ~-~ o (.~ ¢~, Fo 0 I'0 0% Cd o 1,0 o o o o 0 o o 00000000000000000000000000000000 ~ × X X ~000~00~0~000~0000000~0000~0 00~000~00~00000~0000000~00000~0 ~~000~00000~0~00000~00000~00 0~0~~00~~0~0~~0~~0~ 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000©00000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000 om~ co co o o · ~ .r~ · 0 00 0 CD 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 kD 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00 00 00 01 Ln o~] 00000000000000000000000000000~ 0 C O© C~ < ~0 O~ ~0 ~0000000000000000000000000000 ~0000~000~0~00~000000~~00~ ~0000~00000~00~00000000000000 ~0~0~~~0~~0~0~~0~ 0000~00000~0~0~00000~~0~0~ ~~~~0~00~~0000~0~0 ~0000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000 ~HHHHHHHHHHH~ C ~ HHHHHHHHHHH~ ~ ~ © ~ ~ © ~~0~0000~ 00~000000~ ~~0~00~ 0~~000~00~ ~00~~0~0 ooo oooo o~ 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000 XXXXXXXXXXXX 000000000000 000000000000 IIIIIIIIIIII 000000000000 000000000000 ~~~ooo 000000 ~ o~] 0 0 XXX 0 ~ o~ <<<o oc © © 0000 < U~ © o(3 ~0 ,, c0 o L~ 0"~ ~-.~ C,J ~U 0 I.~ O0 O0 CO ~ 0 000 0 0'1 0 000 0 0 000 0 · 0 0 0 000 0 CD O00 0 0 000 0 ~C) ~ o o 0 o · o ~ · o · · 0 0 ~ o ,.1::, · 0 o00 · 0 0 ooo ooo ooo 00000000000000000000 ~0 ~~ ~ ~ ~00 0 00~0000000~00~0~00~00 0~0000000~00~00~0 ~0~~~000~0~00~ 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 co LDLDO cz) COL,JO ~ CO i.-~ i.~ .r,, L.~ .,.,.1 ,,...] 000 00 co co .-4 o ooo o oo o ~.-~ r,0 i~ i,o coOLD 00 co oD 00 Fo co oD oD co -.4 LD ..4 -..1 0 0 00 0 0 00 t-~ 0 ~ ~ ~-~ 0 k'~ 0 ooo ooo ooo ooo 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 o~ ~~ © 000 0000000000000 ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~0 ~-0 L"aO ~X ~ H ~0 0 H eeo 0 © O~ ~0 ~ ~0 < U~ ~U ~0 o~ © Z 000000000000 ~ ~ ~ ~ 000000000000 O0 O0 000 0 0000~0000000 0 ~0~~0~0 ~0~000000 0 000000000000 0 000000000000 000000000000 0 000000000000 0 · , r,,,. ~ O0 · 00 00 00 O~ ~0 H I o o o 01 OFOFO oo o o · o ~ , o o, o O0 O00~U 0~00 000<' ZZZ'~ · ~ . ..... ~00 00~ 00000 00~ 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 ~000000000 o o oo oo oo o o o o o o o o o o oo oo o o ooooo ooooo o~ ~0 © O~ O~ CX oooo$$$8ooo$$o < 0 ~0 ,, ~000 ~000 ~0~000 000000 ~00000 0 ~00 00000 00000 00000 00000 ~0 · o o 1 · O~ · · o ~0000000000000000 CO 0'-I 1',3 00000 0000000000000 ~00~00~0000~00000~ ~00~00000~00000~© 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 -~] ,-4 I I 00 CO OD ~ ~) 00 00 00000 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 00000 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 00000 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 © O~ :~0 0~ c~ ~ 0 H H C C C ~0 C < U~ ~U ~0 © oo ~0 i.~ o o 0 1,3 0'~ o o o 0 ~o~00 ~o~oo ~0~ o0~ ~0~ ~oooo ooooo ooooo 0ooo0 o ~ ....40'~ N) o c~ c,n 00 cn , , · , · · , 0~H · ~HHHH 0~~ 0~~ ~H~ o~0o oooo oooo oooo ooooo o oo o ooooo o oo o ooo0o o oo o ~o~ ~ ~ ~ ooo ooo ooo o o CD 0 O0 0 ~ Cn Cn ~ 0 C0 CO o o o o oo c~) 0ooo oooo oooo © o~ < © ~0 ITEM NO. 6b DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY TREASURER COMPENSATION At the July 17, 1996 City Council meeting the ordinance amending the compensation for the City Treasurer was introduced by a unanimous vote. Adoption of the ordinance is now appropriate. Since the introduction by the Council was unanimous, adoption can be made as a "Consent Calendar" action. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the ordinance. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt ordinance amending Chapter 3, Article 3, Section 251 of the Ukiah City Code relative to City Treasurer compensation. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Determine change to compensation is not appropriate and do not adopt ordinance. 2. Determine ordinance is to be modified and remand to staff for necessary revisions. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: NA Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Acct. No.: N/A Michael F. Harris, AICP, Assistant City Manager Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Ordinance for adoption, page 1. APPROVED' Cand~~ace~av ger mfh:asrcc 8796ADORDTR ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING SECTION 251, TREASURER The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows- SECTION ONE Section 251, of Chapter 3, Article 3, is hereby modified to read as follows- ~251: COMPENSATION; BOND: The Treasurer of the City shall receive as total compensation the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred dollars ($3,600.00) per year payable monthly. The City Treasurer shall be bonded in the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). The bond fee shall be a proper charge against such funds of the City as the City Council shall desiqnate This increase in compensation shall be effective on the dat~ of ~doption of this Ordinance. SECTION TWO This Ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall become effective thirty (30) days after it is adopted. Introduced by title only on July 17, 1996, by the following roll call vote- AYES: NOES' ABSENT' Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schneiter. None. None. Adopted on roll call vote- , 1996, by the following AYES- NOES- ABSENT- ATTEST: Fred Schneiter, Mayor City Clerk ITEM NO. 6c DATE' AUGUST 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF DIVISION 8 OF THE CITY OF UKIAH CITY CODE REGULATING PARKING IN MUNICIPAL PRAKING LOTS At the July 17, 1996 City Council meeting the ordinance amending the regulations in municipal parking lots was introduced by a unanimous vote. Adoption of the ordinance is now appropriate. Since the introduction by the Council was unanimous, adoption can be made as a "Consent Calendar" action. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the ordinance. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt ordinance amending Chapter 3, Division 8 of the Ukiah City Code regulating parking in municipal parking lots. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Determine change in parking regulations is not appropriate and do not adopt ordinance. 2. Determine ordinance is to be modified and remand to staff for necessary revisions. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Acct. No.' N/A NA Michael F. Harris, AICP, Assistant City Manager Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Ordinance for adoption, pages 1-2. APPROVED: 'x~;~ "}.~~%~~~ Candace Horsley, ager rnfh:asrcc 8796PKORAD ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF DIVISION 8 OF THE CITY OF UKIAH MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING PARKING IN MUNICIPAL PARKING LOTS. The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows: SECTION ONE Sections 7351 and 7383 of Chapter 3, Division 8 of the Ukiah City Code are hereby amended to read as follows: [}7351: METHOD OF REGULATION: The method of regulation and control of parking or standing of vehicles in municipal off-street parking lots shall be determined by resolution of the City Council, and may be by parking meters, parking permits, attendants or any other appropriate means. On those municipal parking lots which are to be controlled by parking meters, the Chief of Police shall cause parking meters to be installed and maintained. §7383: PENALTY: It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provisions or fail to comply with any requirements of this Chapter, including any resolutions adopted by the City Council as authorized by this Chapter. Any such violation shall constitute an infraction. Any such violation coming within the terms of Vehicle Code Section 40200, as amended, [violations of regulations governing the parking or standing of vehicles where the prescribed penalty is not a misdemeanor] shall be subject to the civil penalties provided in Article 3 of Chapter 1 of Division 17 of the Vehicle Code. SECTION TWO This Ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall become effective thirty (30) days after it is adopted. INTRODUCED by title only on July 17,1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, and Mayor Schnieter None None ADOPTED on August 7, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Fred Schneiter, Mayor ATTEST: Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk mfh:resord PARKING Item No. 6 d Date: Auaust 7. 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Approve Project Change Orders in the amount of $177,210.36 and Authorize the Payment of Change Orders and Release of Retention to Pacific Mechanical Corporation and Authorize the City Clerk to Publish a Notice of Completion relative to Work Performed During the Construction of the Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility. REPORT: Construction of the Advanced Wastewater Treatment Project as mandated by the State of California has now been Completed. The total construction cost of this project was $6,139,000. As a result of required changes in design and construction due to unknown and unforseen interfacing problems between the AWT and the existing plant it was required to preform change orders in the amount of $177,210.36. $613,900 was budgeted for this additional work. It should be noted, that $86,781 of these change orders is comprised of three items. Items 1 and 2 were funded by the 612 Sewer Operating Fund. These were: 1) Work Surface around AWT $11,021 2) Primary Air Compressor $23,024 3) In-line Grinders for Digesters $52,736 Pacific Mechanical Corporation has completed the construction and Punch-list items requested by City Staff and the Resident Engineer. The Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility has been operating as specified since March 1996. The State of California Project Inspector has released the Project. As a result, staff would request Approval of the change orders and authorization of payment to PMC. In addition, it is requested that all retention currently being held by the City of Ukiah be released to PMC. With the completion of this project, staff would also request that the City Clerk be Authorized to publish a Notice of Completion. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Approve Project Change Orders in the Amount of $177,210.36. 2) Authorize the Payment of Change Orders. 3) Approve Release of Retention to Pacific Mechanical Corp. 4) Authorize the City Clerk to Publish Notice of Completion. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Reject Approval and Direct Staff as to Requested Action. Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachment: 1) Change Order Detail Candace Horsley, FROM: Carl C. Thompson Quality Technical Services 3801 Ridgewood Road Willits, Ca. 95490 May 4, 1996 (Revised) July 29,1996 TO: The City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, Ca. 95482 SUBJECT: Change Order Number 2 for the Ukiah AWT and Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. SRF# C-06-4102-110. Contractor- Pacific Mechanical Corporation, Inc.. ATT: Darryl Barnes, Director of Public Utilities. The following is an additional listing of the Time and Material Work Orders in numerical sequence for the additional work done by the Pacific Mechanical Corporation, Inc., during the Progress of the Construction of the Ukiah AWT and Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. At the beginning of the Project it was decided by all parties to keep Time and Material slips on all extra work whether it was Owner generated or work not shown on the construction plans, or work necessary for the integrity of the plant systems. The following listing includes Credits as well as additional cost changes to the City of Ukiah. l) Brush Hogging the existing wall of the Secondary Sedimentation Tank to receive the Launder equipment versus the elimination of the Fillet along the East and West Walls of the New Secondary Sedimentation Tank. Work Sheets # 12 Through 16, # 18 Through 22 and Sheet #99. The total labor ended up being $4,177.00 and It is felt that it is a push for forming and pouring the Fillets. No additional Cost Change! 2) Cost for the Contractor to furnish startup Polymer for the Clarifier/Filters. Total this Change- $1,920.00. 3) For repair of the Roll-up door in the AWT Building. Total this Change=S445.00. 4) Addition of one 4" cleanout and one l" Coupling at the Sludge Air lift pumps. Total this Change--S430.00. 5)RFQ# 15, Adding an additional sampling line from the Rapid Mix Pump to the Sample Sink in the AWT Building. Total this Change $2,469.00. 6) RFQ#3, Purchase, relocated and install sequentially two Air Compressors like kind for the Sludge Lift Pumps in the Primary Sedimentation Tank. Total this Change=S23,024.00. 7) RFQ# 14, Purchase and install two in line grinders to process the material coming out of the two existing Digesters before the Sludge enters the Heat Exchangers. Total this Change= $52,736.00. 8) Due to the detail on the fabrication of the Weirs for the New Launder being wrong on the plan sheets, they were furnished unusable and had to be remanufactured. Total this Change=S1,949.00. 9) Manufacturing and installing additional supports to be located on both sides of the Motorized Strainer. Total this Change=S559.00. 10) Waterproof splicing on the connections used on RFQ# 18. D&G Electric. Total this change=S428.74. Note: The following is the total of changes billed out by the Electrical Sub-Contractor WSB Electric; 11) RFQ#7 Revised, Dechlorination Conduits Three Reports. Total this change Order = PMC's P-7741-9 & P-7741-13(A) Total =$2,159.52. 12)Intercept conduits at Chlorination Facility and Reroute new Duct Bank, and Installation of Ductbank to De-chlorination facility, WSB Invoices #'s 6035, 6036, and 6041 thru 6048. Total this change=S3,397.50. 13) Relocation of Conduit #400. Total this Change = $1,350.71. 14) Identify and connect control conductors to Blower #2 at Sed. Tanks. Total this change=S505.72. 15)Pull wire at sample pumps at De-chlorination Facility, Relocate Conduit for Aeration Blower at Blower Room, Pull out old signal cable and pull in Blue Hose to existing Mechanical Building, Pull and connect wiring from Disconnects to valves at FCV 142,141,15 l,and 152, and add additional cable and installation time for relocated conduit 400 at redwood trees. Total this Change = $3,294.79. 16) Installation of conduit in existing mechanical trench for reconnection to the transfer pump station, Layout conduit stub ups. cut and thread PVC coated nipples, cut Unistrut, begin conduit installation, Area 2 install PVC coated Risers to De-chlorination Facility. Total this Change Order = $863.97. 17) Raise conduits at Sed.. tank for intercept existing conduits, Verify conduits to existing Sed. tank light, and expose broken condUit on existing Sed.. tank. Total this change=$1,932.78. 18) Relocate conduit 400. Field bend and install 21/2" conduit, place concrete, knock out underground pullbox for conduit entrance. Total this Change OrderS328.41. 19) Extra work was accomplished on the Chlorination Facility, The Invoice which are covered in this change are 6507, 6516, 6518, and 6519. Total this Change Order=$1,245.05. This includes all of the change order work for the AWT and Waste water Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. There will be no additional Change Orders related to this Project. Total for the Time and Material work done on this report is: $ 99,039.19.00. The total for the Change Order Report Number One is $78,171.17. To Date total in Change Orders is equal to $177,210.36. Project Engineer, FROM: Carl C. Thompson Quality Technical Services 3801 Ridgewood Road Willits, Ca. 95490 Revised March 23, 1996 July 29, 1996 TO: The City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, Ca. 95482 SUBJECT: Change Order for the Ukiah AWT and Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. SRF# C-06-4102-110. Contractor Pacific MeChanical Corporation Inc. ATT: Darryl Bames~ Director of Public Utilities The following is a listing of the Time and Material work orders in numerical sequence for the additional work done by the Pacific Mechanical Corporation, Inc. during the Progress of the Construction of the Ukiah AWT and Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. At the beginning of the Project it was decided by all parties to keep T&M slips on all extra work either it was Owner generated or work not shown on the construction plans, or work necessary for the integrity of the plant systems. The following listing includes Credits as well as additional cost changes to the City of Ukiah. 1) Encasement of 42" line Secondary Sedimentation Tank Effluent: Original Bid = $13,393.00 due to realignment. Cost to Encase= $7,873.00. Saving to the City of $5,520.00. 2) Deletion of the Hydro- seeding. Credit back of $1,300.00. 3) Permanently wire up of existing Secondary Sedimentation Tank Skimmers and Scrapers. RFQ#2 Original Price Quote $13,345.00. Due to accomplishing work on a Time and Material basis, Cost $7,459.00. Work was inadvertently left off of the Project Construction Plans 4) Additional grade excavation for the Back Wash Lagoons to eliminate sub- surface water. Original Price Quote $10,000 plus dollars. Work done on a Time and Material basis Cost total =$2,552.00. a savings of approximately $7,500.00 5) Stopple installation due to the problem of not being able to make the Sludge line which routes to the Sludge Lagoons dead without emptying the Lagoon of Sludge. Work done on a Time and Material basis, Total cost-- $7,379.08. 6) Change Air Wash Piping to Schedule 40 Carbon Steel and Add Fittings (Partial). Cost to date $3,256.44. Still outstanding is credit for returning the stainless steel pipe and fittings..As of July 29, 1996 It has been agreed with PMC,Inc. that a trade of equal value would be done. As agreed elimination ofRRQtt 10,10A, and 10B, in exchange for the Credit back for the return of the stainless steel pipe and fittings, was accomplished. 7) Cost of adding additional Spool s at the AWT and Back Wash Pumping Stations. Necessary due to vibrations of the Pumps while they are running, inadvertently left off of the design Contract Drawings. Total cost = $3,824.65. 8) Temporary wiring of the Secondary Sedimentation Tanks which was not shown on the Design Contract Drawings. Total cost = $2,015.00. 9) Owner generated time and material work requested by Frank Noyd. The stream in front of the Sewer Treatment plant was loaded up with gravel silts and needed to be cleaned. Total Cost = $2,033.00. 10) Due to the alignment and placement of the AWT building a 12" existing valve had to be removed so as not to be covered by the building, Total Cost of $2,233.00. 11) Owner generated to remove a valve assembly which at one time was used as a overflow during flooding of the plant grounds. The configuration of the Backwash Lagoons and the Installation of a Storm drain Structure eliminated the need for the overflow and the State wanted it removed. Total cost =$860.00. 12) Additional realignment of temporary electrical service, not shown on.the contract Drawings. Total Cost $377.00. 13) Additional Excavation or Pot Holing required because the location of the existing piping not where shown on Contract Drawings, Total Cost=$1,023.00. 14) Base Platform for the stairs on the Above Ground Fuel Tank not shown on the Contract Drawings, Total Cost =$418.00 15) Owner purchased Contractor installed additional valve for the ease of Operation and Isolation of the Reclaimed water system around the Plant. Total Cost $626.00. 16) This Time and Materials should be charged out to Redevelopment for necessary import of material that was needed to balance the quantities at the Plaza Park Project. Total Cost =$1,188.00. · 17) The sink that was called out to be used in the Sludge De-watering building was incorrect for the fixtures that were called to be installed on the sink. We chose to get the proper sink for this installation. Total Cost=$1,414.00. '18) As requested the Sludge Valves were relocated and differed from the contract drawings for ease of access. Requested by Frank Noyd. Total Cost=$390.00. 19) Necessary to add additional 4"storm drain line to Overflow Storm Drain station due to the fact that a 12" line is feeding the station and Hydraulically the 4"drain line would not handle the influent flow. Total Cost =$459.00. 20) Drain not where shown on the Contract Drawings from Sludge lagoon to the Septage Structure, necessary to relocated and encase the line. Total Cost $351.00. 21) Because of location of existing Sludge lines not shown on the drawings additional rerouting of the new lines had to be done where by additional fittings had to be used to accomplish the task. Total Cost = $ 558.00. 22) Because of the level in the existing sludge ponds the contractor was unable to finish installing the three way valve which was called for on the Contract drawings, The Owner has received a credit back on the three way valve and has been charged for two -two way. valves. Total cost-$594.00 23) Due to the grades on the contract drawings additional drainage was necessary on the North end of the Backwash lagoons. Total Cost =$ 2,707.00. 24)Additional Piping Supports were needed to keep the Piping from possibly twisting due extreme vibration or severe earthquake condition. Total Cost =$955.00. 25) The center panel on the Sink back board was inadvertently left off of the Contract Drawings, The sink is located in the Chemical feed room of the AWT building and all of the transmitters are located on the panel. Total Cost =$493.00. 26) Owner requested for replacement of valve in existing Grit Blower Total Cost=$863.00. 27) Contractor supplied and installed sand on a line that existed but was not part of the contract work. Total Cost $668.00. 28) Rubber stripping was added for sound deadening and corrosion prevention on the grates that are installed on the AWT Filter Tanks. Not shown on Contract Drawings, Total Cost=$326.00. 29) Owner generated. Requested by Frank Noyd for access to the Creek between the Chlorine Contact Basins and the Sedimentation Lagoons at the east side of the AWT Building~ Total Cost =$541.00. 30) Air Flow Meter in the overhead of the Air Scour Blower room has to have access not shown on the Contract Drawings. Total Cost=S210.00. 3 l) At Owners request the Stand pipe and concrete structure was removed and a dresser coupling was installed to keep the line integrity. Requested by Frank Noyd. Total Cost- $1,996.00. 32) Additional Pipe Supports needed at Back Wash Pumping station, which were not shown on the Contract Drawings. Total Cost=$521.00. 33) Owner generated Change for Isolation of the piping system at the Bisulfate feed Pumping station. Total Cost=$624.00. 34) The existing well water piping system had a degenerated Gate Valve Buried and was about to fail. Owner generated change requested by Jack Brose. Total Cost = $1,292.00. 35) A leak appeared on the existing supply piping in the mechanical building Chlorine Analyzer room. Owner requested that the Contractor make repairs because he was doing new work in the area. Total Cost=$153.00. 36) Due to saturated ground conditions Owner requested that some gravel that was taken out of the creek in front of the plant be spread around the site for access. Total Cost=$289.00. 37) Need to add a length of 12" drain line to extend to the toe of fill on the additional parking area East of the AWT Building. Owner generated, total Cost--$333.00. 38) Owner requested the contractor to purchase additional spare parts for a supply stock. Jack Brose requested the acquisition. Total Cost $2,236.00. 39) As a safety precaution additional bollards were installed that were not shown on the Contract Drawings. Total Cost $ 758.00. 40) Needed to rotate the Line that holds the Flow Meter at the Back Wash pmnps due to ~Air entrapment. Total Cost=$1,015.00. 41) Needed to add Redwood Covers at the East side of the New Secondary Sedimentation Tank to protect the Electrical LB's from being damaged by traffic. Total Cost=$382.00. 42) Contractor' repaired sidewalk areas where the Owner removed for replacement of the emergency eye wash stations. Total Cost=$250.00. 43) Owner generated for ease of access around the AWT Building and at the Plant entrance. Not shown on the Contract Drawings. Total Cost of additional Asphalt=$11,021.00. 44) Additional layout and grade alignment work was needed to locate placement of the additional asphalt at the Comers and back of the AWT Building. Total Cost =$472.00. 45) Contractor had to replace and repair existing Hot Water Piping where it'entered the Mechanical Building. Total Cost=$1,953.00. 46) Additional Sidewalk was done on RFQ# 1, which is located at the East side of the Operations Building. Total Cost = $2,530.00. There will be one additional Change Order to finish up the project. It will be submitted at the time of Substantial complete for this Project. The total for the Time and Material work done on this report is: $78,171.17 Carl C. Thompson Item No. 6e Date: August 7. 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Approve a Budget Amendment for Expenditures relative to Tree Trimming Contract. REPORT: The Electric Department Budgeted for Tree Trimming work in its 1995-1996 Fiscal Budget in the amount of $30,000. This contract was awarded to Marvin's Garden of Willits, California, in April 1996. The work performed under this contract has continued into the new fiscal year. However, during the budget hearings this contract was over looked relative to a request for carry-over funding. Therefore, staff would request that carry-over funding be granted for this contract in an amount not to exceed $12,752 into account 800-3728-250. To complete this action a Budget Amendment is required. This reduces the projected actual 1995-1996 expenditures and increases the 1996-1997 approved expenses. The attached worksheets illustrate the amendment. Staff recommends approval of this Budget Amendment. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a Budget Amendment for Expenditures relative to Tree Trimming Contract. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Reject Approval. Acct. No. (If not budgeted): Appropriation Request: Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Prepared by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachment: 1) Budget Amendment Worksheets Acct. No. (if budgeted) ~"~n~ace Horsley, Ci{y'M~nager c: ITl .-I ~> z IT! z .-I -.I 0 ! : :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: :.::: ::: ::::::::::::::::::::: =========================== ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ':.:.:.:.:;.:.... ::::::::::::::::::::: !:!:!:!: ::::::::::::::::::::::: .::::::. :i:i:i:i:i:i:.~l~_;ii :::::::::::::::::::::: CO · :,:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:.:-: :.1:.:. :.' '"'i:i:!?~: iiiii:i:iii!iI::~ :::::::::::::::::::::::: i~iiii:~ii! ~::: :....: .::::::::. r- o --. ""( 0 0 Z Z ! Z -I rtl z z 0 ITEM NO. 6t: MEETING DATE AUGUST 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE PAYMENT TO FREIGHTLINER ENTERPRISE CORPORATION/AMERICAN LaFRANCE FIRE APPARATUS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $51,824.28 FOR REPAIR TO FIRE DEPARTMENT AERIAL LADDER TRUCK In 1987 the City purchased a used 1983 model American LaFrance aerial ladder truck from the City of Piedmont. Annually, the ladder is thoroughly inspected and tested by a licensed testing service to assure structural integrity and overall serviceability and safety of the apparatus. Continued on page 2. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize payment to the Freightliner Enterprise Corporation/American LaFrance Fire Apparatus for repairs to the aerial ladder truck in the amount of $51,824.28. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: None Acct. No.: N/A (if NOT budgeted) Appropriation Requested: Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Acct. No.:100-2101-303-001 N/A Fred W. Keplinger, Director of Public Safety Roe M. Sandelin, Fire Operations Commander Candace Horsley, City Manager American LaFrance invoice dated 7/30/96 Freightliner Enterprise Corporation -letter dated December 14, 1995 -letter dated January 16, 1996 APPROVED BY Candace H~)rsley, City~,anager In December, 1995, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., began the annual inspection and testing of the apparatus. During the course of this process a significant stress crack was discovered in the left base rail of the bed section of the aerial ladder. The Freightliner Enterprise Corporation, parent company of American LaFrance Fire Apparatus, was contacted. It was quickly learned there is only one location in the United States that is authorized to make repairs to American LaFrance aerial ladders and that is the American LaFrance Service Center in the state of Virginia. Because of concerns about product liability, American LaFrance will not authorize outside vendors to repair it's aerial ladders. Given this situation there really were only two options to consider in securing the repairs. The first option was to transport the entire apparatus to the facility for repair. The second option was to have a subcontractor remove the ladder, ship it to Virginia for repair, and then reinstall the refurbished ladder on the apparatus. It was determined the best option would be to ship the entire apparatus to American LaFrance and avoid the complexities and potential complications of having a third party (subcontractor)involved. The need for the repair was presented to the City Council during the 1996-97 budget hearings and funding was provided. Because this apparatus is the only one of it's kind immediately available for emergencies in the city, it was determined the repairs should be moved forward on an "emergency need" basis. On June 27, 1996, the ladder truck was loaded on a transport and hauled to Virginia. The apparatus is presently at the Freightliner Enterprise Corporation/American LaFrance Service Center. Repairs are expected to be completed on July 31, 1996. The apparatus is scheduled for return shipping on August 9, 1996. Terms of the work agreement require that payment, in full, be received at the Service Center before the apparatus is shipped. American LaFrance provides a one year limited parts and labor warranty for repairs and refurbishments. The total cost of repairs is $51,824.28 Contained within this figure are costs for the repairs to the damaged aerial ladder ($48,456.99) and costs for repairs to the main hydraulic swivel and leaking waterways ($3,367.29). AERIAL LADDER materials 15,930.90 tax (7.25%) 1,1 54.99 labor 19,471.10 ce rtificat ion 3,500. O0 transpo rtatio n 8.400. O0 $48,456.99 The city's insurance policy will cover the cost of the repair to the damaged aerial ladder, less a $15,000 deductible. page 2 MAIN HYDRAULIC SWIVEL, WATERWAYS materials 1,467.45 tax (7.25%) 106.39 labor 1.793.45 $3,367.29 The repairs for the hydraulic swivel and leaking waterways will be charged to the fire department automotive repair account (100-2101-303-001). In summary, staff recommends to pay for the work pedormed by the Freightliner Enterprise Corporation/American LaFrance. Timely payment will assure the quickest possible return of the ladder truck. page 3 · '~0 O0 ~..~ <Jo .? 8 8 0 O0 0 II · · · Z .~ ~' · ! ! II 0~0~0 H~T: TO I TRUCKSI FREIGHTLINER ENTERPRISE CORPORATION 600 MOUNTAIN LANE BLUEFIELD, VIRGINIA 24605 PHONE (540) 326-1121 FAX (540) 322-3666 AMERICAN LAI=RANCE December 14, 1995 Capt. George Hall Ukiah Fire Department 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 "Dear Capt. Hall Confirming our telephone conversation, American LaFrance does not approve of anyone other than trained American LaFrance service personnel performing structural repairs or alterations to the aerial ladder, turntable support, chassis, or outrigger system. Structural repairs are defined as ANY repair requiring cutting, welding, drilling, or bending of the ladder sections, turntable, or outriggers as well as their supporting members. These repairs are, by virtue of liability, not approved or authorized to be done outside American LaFrance. Specifically relating to aerial ladder section repairs, American LaFrance insists upon using the original manufacturing fixtures to insure repairs are accomplished to original component tolerances. For this reason ladder sections requiring repairs must be sent to the American LaFrance factory. If your ladder was to be shipped to the factory, the factory ladder shop personnel would perform a close-inspection using the original manufacturing fixtures. The inspection will be conducted as follows: Steam clean and disassemble the ladder. .. Remove all rung covers, cables, sheaves. Sand blast all sections to remove all paint. Sand all base rails to remove surface irregularities. Thickness check rails. Magnetic Particle and/or Dye Penetrant inspect all welds. Inspect all slides (rollers), sheaves, sheave brackets, bearings, rungs, hand rails, cables, and ladder locks. Inspect all cables and cable anchor locations. Inspect all babbitted areas of the ladder. This inspection shall determine which ladder sections are repairable and to identify any sections which, in their opinion, are beyond repair. Assuming the entire ladder is repairable, we would continue to do the following: Rebabbit all slide areas as necessary. Install new aluminum slide blocks. Install new upper brass slide blocks. Repair or replace sheaves, sheave brackets and bearings as necessary. Install all new cables. .~ Repair or replace ladder lock assemblies as required. ~-- Repair or replace damaged ladder rungs as required. Repair any defective welds. ' ~Underwriters~type manufacturing certification of all ladder's~ctions (remanufactured or new). Steam clean, prepare and repaint ladder assembly (to your color requirements)· Tip of top fly sectionwill be painted "Dayglow" red. Install all new ladder rung covers. Assemble ladder and prepare for shipment or installation. The cost for this inspection and refurbishing the ladder is $35,402.00. Should a ladder, section, the intercom/nozzle control wiring, or-side water pipes and seals require repair /replacement you will be notified in writing and no further work will be done until we receive your written approval. The following options are available at the time of refurbishment: i · · · Upgrade the ladder to accept a 15° nozzle manifold. $ 6,500.00 . Install a 15° side sweep nozzle manifold (less the nozzle) . ~ $ 4,800.00 · . Replace side water pipe assemblies. $ 7,418.00 NOTE: This pricing does not include the ladder removal, ladder installation, sales tax (if required), or any freight charges. The removal and installation can be performed by a local fire apparatus repair facility knowledgeable in aerial ladder installation. Should you want to bring the complete truck to the factory; we can remove the ladder, install the completed ladder, perform final adjustments after the installation, and have an independent third party recertification test performed for an additional $3,500.00. It will be the responsibility of the Fire Department to transport the. unit to and from the American LaFrance Factory Service Center located in Bluefield Virginia. We can however, assist you in obtaining flat bed trailer truck transportation if needed. The · estimate transportation'cost is $4,200.00 each way. We must have your purchase order or written authorization before we can accept the ladder, order parts, or proceed with repairs. All repairs will be of quality workmanship according to accepted practices within the Fire Industry. Any alterations, deviations or hidden damage from the attached specifications requiring extra costs will be executed only upon written orders and will become 'an extra charge over.and..above the. quoted or bid price. American LaFrance'provides.a one year limited parts and labor warranty for repairs-and r~furbishments ......... -~-~ Ail parts removed become the property of American LaFrance (unless mutually agreed upon in writing, in advance) and any trade-in value has been taken into consideration and is included in the quoted or bid price. Terms will be net upon completion and acceptance of the unit at the Service Center (or prior to shipment). These terms shall be included on the Purchase Order. This-quotation will be valid for 45 days after which time it will have to be reviewed for any changes .... ~_._ ~ ~ . If you have any questions, please call us at 912-775-2427 or 540-326-1121. , t ly, Donald G. DiStefano Sales/Service Manager · . cc: Heller Jan.'~ '96 14:39 AMERICAN LAFRANCE GA. FAX 912-775-2427 FREIGHTLINER ENTERPRISE CORPORATION 600 MOUNTAIN LANE 8LU£FIELD, VIRGINIA 24605 . PHONE (,540) 326-11:21 FAX (,540) 322-3666 January 16, 1996 Capt. George Hall Ukiah Fire Department 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 Dear Capt. Hall .-_ Post-Il' brand fax transmittal memo 7571 I have reviewed the Underwriters Laboratories test ~95FS428 for your American LaFrance 75' Water Chief reg. #7867. The report indicates that in addition to the ladder repairs we discussed several other items require repair, specifically= 1. The main hydraulic swivel (center'post) requires resealing. 2. There is a leaking hydraulic line located in the torque box area. 3. The auxiliary hydraulic pump interlock valve is leaking. Plus, as you stated there may be leaks in the waterway seals and the rotation bearing may require replacement. Without visually inspecting the unit myself I can only estimate the cost of these additional repairs as follows: 1. Reseal main hydraulic swivel. · 2. Repair or replace leaking hydraulic line. 3. Reseal interlock valve. $ 2,061.00 $ 288.00 $ 445.00 4. Replace (worst case scenario) both waterway pipe assemblies. NO~E: Due to a change in vendors for the special tubes and seals there has been a major price increase since my December 14, 1995 letter for the waterways. $10,094.00 5. Replace rotation bearing, upper and lower turntable bolts. $10,726.00 Jan.~ '96 14:~12 AMERICAN LAFRANCE GA. FAX 912-775-2427 With ~h'e exception of the waterway pricing all other prices, terms, and conditions in my December 14, 1995 letter remain unchanged.' .................... If you have any questions, please call us at 912-775-2427 or 540-326-1121. Donald G. D~- Sales/Service Manager ..... cc: Heller ITEM NO. - 6g DATE: AUgUSt 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Declaration of Surplus Property and authorize the Purchasing Officer to solicit bids and dispose of property if no bids are received. From time to time, various items no longer serve a useful purpose for City operations. It then becomes necessary to dispose of those items. Currently there are several items that are no longer suitable for City use. Staff requests the Council declare the equipment listed on page 2, as surplus and authorize the Purchasing Officer to dispose of the surplus equipment if no bids are received. Some of these items have apparent value. Other items may need to be disposed of as recyclable material or as trash. Bids will be solicited to obtain the best possible value for the surplus items. (Continued on page 2) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Declare listed property surplus and authorize the Purchasing Officer to dispose of any property for which no bids are received. ALTERNATE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Authorize alternate disposal methods 2. Determine the property is not surplus. Prepared by: Attachments: Gordon Elton, Finance Director GE:SURPLUS1.AGN -- ' - ~" '"' Ot¥ Description Electric Dep~ 6 Metal desks 2 Wooden desks 1 Typewriter 1 Paper shredder 1 Shelf 1 Stuffing Machine 1 Chair 1 10hp electric motor Police Debt -- 3 Fiberglass rear prisoner seat for Chevy Caprice 6 Prisoner wire partitions for Ford Crown Victoria & Dodge Diplomat 2 Front push bumpers for Dodge Diplomat 1 1991 Chevrolet Caprice, Unit #4193 S.N.: 1G1BL5375MR149763 2 Rockwell Model 5 parking meters Fire Dept 1 1946 Peter Pirsch Fire Engine S.N.: 1476 750 gallon per minute pump; Engine #6; Unit No. 6586R City Manager 1 3M 905 Overhead projected (Blows lamp) Sewer Debt -- 1 Sunbeam sheep shearing machine 2 Lindsay water softener Finance Debt -- 1 Swingline Model 6385 check signing Machine S.N. 5253 Est. Value Nominal Nominal Nominal Nominal Nomznal Nommnal Nominal Nominal $ 50.00ea $ 75.00ea $ 25.00ea $4,500.00 $ 25.00ea Undetermined Nominal $ 25.00 $400.00 $100.00 GE:SURPLUS1 .AGN Page 2 ITEM NO. 6-H DATE: August 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REPORT OF THE ACQUISITION OF CATAPHOTE POWDER FOR TRAFFIC MARKING APPLICATIONS SUMMARY: In compliance with Section 1522 of the City of Ukiah Municipal Code, this report is being submitted to the City Council for the purpose of reporting the acquisition of supplies costing more than $5,000 but less than $10,000. The City Street Department worked with the Purchasing Department to obtain quotes for the acquisition of cataphote powder. This powder is utilized to "paint" school crosswalks, white crosswalks, and other pavement markings. The powder is utilized since it has a longer survival rate on the streets as compared to conventional traffic paint. This purchase amount of $6,267.69 is less than the street maintenance budget amount of $6,600.00. RECOMMENDED ACTION: None. Report is submitted pursuant to Municipal Code. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: None. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: 100.3110.420.006 Appropriation Requested' N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised: N/A _ ~ Requested by: ~~ Prepared by: Rick Sean6r, ~eputy Director of Public Works Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Rick Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attachments: N/A APPROVED: Candace Ho y, City g RJS:AGCATRFQ.SUM AGENDA SUMMARY ITEM NO. 6 i DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 REPORT SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONSULTANT SERVICE CONTRACT TO LAWRENCE AND ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,764 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FIVE (5) GAS MONITORING WELLS In response to the City's "Request for Cost Proposal to Construct Five (5) Gas Migration Monitoring Wells and the Preparation of the Report of Well Installation and Initial Monitoring" (RFP) six (6) proposals were received by the deadline of July 19, 1996, from a field of 18 consultants who received the RFP. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award Consulting Service Agreement to Lawrence and Associates for the construction of five (5) gas monitoring wells. Compensation to be on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed maximum compensation of $25,764 for the first 560 feet of total well bore drilled. For every foot of well bore drilled exceeding a total of 560 feet, consultant shall be compensated at $19.70 per foot of well bore. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS' If award is not made on or before August 7, 1996, the City will be in violation of the Stipulated Agreement. Make award to another consultant. Appropriation Requested: Citizen Advised' Requested by' Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: N/A N/A Rick H. Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer ~_.~ Rick H. Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Summary of Consultants Proposed Costs. 2. Portion of RFP 3. Portions of Consultants Proposals. a. Lawrence and Associates b. EMCON c. Mark Group d. Kleinfelder e. SHN Consulting f. Dames and Moore 4. Stipulated Order of Compliance and Agreement APPROVED- R:I \LANDFILL:kk ALAWRENCE Candace Horsley, City Manger Award of Consultant Contract to Lawrence and Associates in the Amount of $25,764 for the Construction of Five Gas Monitoring Wells August 7, 1996 Page 2 The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) has directed the City to complete the gas monitoring network for the City's landfill. On June 18, 1996, the City of Ukiah entered into a Stipulated Order of Compliance and Agreement No. 96-01 with the Mendocino County Department of Public Health which requires the City to perform various tasks and to complete two (2) projects relating to gas control and monitoring. The City has completed the first milestone for each project stipulated in this Agreement. The City's second milestone related to gas monitoring is the award of a contract for the construction of the remaining five (5) gas wells of a monitoring system which will include a total of 10 monitoring wells. The first five (5) wells of the monitoring system were constructed along the landfills southern boundary in 1994. It is believed that all six (6) consultants who have responded to the RFP have adequate resources and expertise required and necessary to perform the work within the required time frame identified in the Request for Proposal. Proposed compensation for the performance of the work is the only selection criteria that sets apart the consultants. As required by the RFP, the proposed compensation was to be based on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed maximum amount. The guaranteed maximum compensation was to be made on the premise that the wells would be drilled to the depths indicated in the RFP. Field conditions will dictate well depth and therefore, the consultant was to include in their proposed compensation an additional cost per feet of well bore drilled which would be applied to any additional footage drilled beyond the total sum of footage indicated in the RFP (560 feet). The qualified consultant having the lowest guaranteed maximum compensation based on a total footage of 560 feet to be drilled is Lawrence and Associates. Hourly fees as indicated on their Schedule of Fees are very reasonable. It was noted that the additional unit cost of $14.70 for additional footage drilled beyond 560 feet was too low and it was suspected that this unit cost did not include additional time for the Certified Engineering Geologist who must be present on the job site during drilling operations. Bryan Gartner with Lawrence and Associates was contacted and he confirmed that the unit cost did not include professional time. Mr. Gartner verbally relayed by telephone that an additional $5.00 per foot would need to be added to the unit price of $14.70 for a revised unit cost of $19.70 for each foot exceeding a total of 560 feet of well bore drilled. Since the award of the consultant contract can not be made solely on the basis of cost pursuant to the Government Code, it is not necessary to waive this irregularity. Funds for the work of this Agreement have been budgeted at $80,000 for Fiscal Year 1996/97. R:I \LANDFILL:kk ALAWRENCE SUMMARY OF CONSULTANTS PROPOSED BUDGET COSTS CONSULTANT Lawrence and Associates EMCON (1) Mark Group Kleinfelder (2) SHN Consulting (1) Dames and Moore (1) GUARANTEED MAXIMUM COMPENSATION $25,763.51 $27,265.00 $27,500.00 (3) UNIT COST PER ADDITIONAL FOOT $19.70 ($14.70) (6) $28.00 $28,598.00 $28,848.00 (4) $33,536.00 (5) $35.00 $14.00 (6) Not Provided $31,478.00 $25.00 (3 probe well) $27.00 (4 probe well) NOTES: (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Did not provide Fee Schedule. Identified incorrect wells. Not a guaranteed maximum compensation. Only an estimate. Guaranteed maximum compensation for work performed under the supervision of a Certified Engineering Geologist. Guaranteed maximum compensation for a Certified Engineering Geologist to be on site during drilling operations. Does not include professional time for Certified Engineering Geologist. R: I \LANDFILL ALAWRENCE June 17, 1996 REQUEST FOR COST PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT FIVE GAS MIGRATION MONITORING WELLS AND PREPARE REPORT OF WELL INSTALLATION AND INITIAL MONITORING Dear Consultant: Your cost proposal to construct five (5) gas migration monitoring wells which are to be constructed in accordance with the approved "Landfill Gas Monitoring System Proposal" and the preparation of a Well Installation and Initial Monitoring Report for these five wells is requested. INTRODUCTION Subsequent to the submittal and approval of the City's Gas Perimeter Monitoring Plan, five of a total of 10 proposed wells were constructed along the southern boundary of the landfill. The wells constructed were numbered GAS-1 through GAS-5. Although the City has maintained that the remaining five proposed gas wells which are to be located north of the intermittent creek which separates the north limit of the buffed refuse and the proposed locations of four (4) of the remaining five gas wells are not needed because of the hydraulic barrier, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) has directed the City to install the remaining gas wells for purposes of completing the gas monitoring network. The City will soon enter into a Stipulated Agreement whereby the City will commit to the construction of the five remaining wells no later than October 15, 1996 and the well installation report and results of the initial monitoring to be submitted no later than November 1, 1996. The five gas monitoring wells to be constructed are depicted on Attachment "C" as GAS-6 through GAS-10, inclusive. The terrain north of the intermittent creek is steep and wooded with heavy vegetation. Access to the proposed location from GAS-7 should be considered difficult and access from the north to the proposed location for GAS-8 impossible without heavy grading and vegetation removal. Access to the GAS-9 location can be made over the creek from the south with an all terrain drill fig. Access to GAS-10 and GAS-6 locations can be achieved without difficulty. It was originally envisioned that access to GAS-8 would be accomplished with a temporary bridge (rail car) as was used when groundwater monitoring well No.'s 92-2 and 92-3 were constructed. From a construction cost and post construction monitoring perspective it maybe more advantageous to construct wells GAS-7 and GAS-8 at locations depicted as GAS-7 ALT and GAS-8 ALT even though the wells would be deeper at these alternate locations. It is assumed that alternate locations will be acceptable to the Board Staff as long as the required lateral well spacing will not exceed 1,000 feet and the well depths are below refuse depths. Page 1 of 10 The data obtained from a seismic refraction survey conducted between December 1992 and February 1993 indicate that the bottom elevation of refuse varies from 720 to 790 feet MSL with the lower elevation being applicable 'to the western side of the landfill. From discussions with former landfill employees who were responsible for the supervision of landfill operations from 1972, it was relayed to the current Landfill management that landfill employees were instructed not to bury refuse below five feet in elevation above the bottom of the adjacent creek. In the early days of the landfill, the creek bottom was approximately five feet below the north toe access road. During the last 20 plus years the creek bed has been lowered by natural forces from five to eight feet below its original bottom elevation and the north toe access road has been raised in elevation over the years. Recent exploratory findings indicate that the five foot rule for refuse bottom above creek bottom may have been ignored in some areas. Exploratory work at the northeast comer of the primary leachate pond indicate a refuse bottom of approximately 14 to 15 feet below the existing grade of the north access road. From the construction of leachate extraction Well No. 3 (LW-3) it was learned that the refuse bottom is approximately 10 feet below the surface of the access road. From the construction of the extension of the leachate main on the east side of the landfill, it was discovered that refuse bottom exceeded five feet below the existing road surface which is now approximately five feet higher than when the leachate main extension was constructed. Based on the above, refuse bottom in feet above mean sea level within 1,000 feet of the gas wells to be constructed are estimated as follows: " Proposed Lowest Refuse Point Depth of GAS Well Within 1,000 f~t of Well Refuse -MSL GAS-7 or GAS-7ALT Northeast comer of Primary Leachate Pond 695 GAS 8 Point of Access Road approximately 710 300 feet east of northeast comer of Primary Leachate Pond GAS-8ALT Point on Access Road opposite PP-1 710 GAS-9 Point on Access Road opposite 730 Groundwater Monitoring Well No. 92-3 GAS-10 Point on Access Road opposite 745 Groundwater Monitoring Well No. 90-6 GAS-6 Point on Access Road approximately 775 300 feet southwest of GAS-10 Page 2 of 10 Oas Well GAS-7ALT GAS-8ALT GAS-9 GAS-10 GAS-6 The depth of Gas Monitoring Wells shall be at least the depth to the bottom of refuse within 1,000 feet or to the permanent low seasonal water table whichever is higher. The following elevations in feet above mean sea level represent the lowest water level observed in the indicated groundwater monitoring wells since January 1994. GWM Well Lowest Elevation of Groundwater Observed Since 1994 in Feet above MSL 87-1 90-1 92-1 92-2 92-3 90-6 90-8 92-4 (Unusual behavior of water surface) (Unusual behavior of water surface) 678 (South of creek) 680 (South of creek) 686 (North of creek) Artesian at 721 (North of creek) 723 (North of creek) 743 (South of creek) 713 (South of creek) 684 (South of creek) For the purposes of this proposal, consultant shall assume that the gas wells to be constructed shall be drilled to the following depths: Ground Surface at Gas Well at MSL Lowest Refuse Depth at MSL Assumed Lowest Ground- water Elevation at MSL (Interpolated) Assumed Depth of Gas Well Below Ground Surface in Feet 775 942 760 795 85O 695 ~680 95 710 ~700 245 730 ~. 740 30 745 ~740 55 775 ~715 135 Total Footage to be Drilled 560 Feet NOTE: Landfill operator prefers locations GAS-7ALT and GAS-8ALT over that of GAS- 7 and GAS-8 for access and monitoring purposes. Assumed depth of gas well is the difference between ground surface and either the lowest refuse depth or groundwater elevation, whichever produces the greater depth of well. Page 3 of 10 The contempiated work to be performed by the selected consultant is indicated in Attachment "A", Scope-of-Work. Consultant's proposal must address at a minimum the scope-of-work indicated in this attachment, however, consultant may include in their proposal recommendations to either add or delete tasks that consultant believes are or may not be necessary to accomplish project objectives. Recommended additions or deletions to the Scope-of-Work shall be incorporated into the cost proposal as additive or deductive costs to the proposed fee for the base Scope-of-Work pursuant to Attachment "A". Consultants attention is directed to the following attachments: Attachment "A" - Scope-of-Work Attachment "B" - Project Schedule Attachment "C" - Gas Monitoring Network Attachment "D" - Attachment "E" - Attachment "F" - Relationship of Refuse Footprint with Landfill Property. Groundwater elevation versus time graphs. General Landfill Information Attachment "G" - Typical Gas Well Construction Detail Attachment "H" - Attachment "I" - Excerpts from "Landfill Gas Monitoring System Proposal" Typical Log of Exploratory Boring A. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Due Date and Number of Copies One original of the proposal shall be submitted to the City no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 19, 1996. Proposals, received after this deadline will not be considered. Proposal documents received by the City will become the property of the City and the documents will not be returned to the Proposer. Page 4 of 10 Be e Proposals are to be sealed, labeled and addressed or delivered to: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 PROPOSAL: CONSTRUCTION OF FIVE (5) GAS MONITORING WELLS AND PREPARATION OF REPORTS Proposal Contents The Proposal shall contain the following elements: 1. Firm Qualifications and Resources. A summary of the Consulting Firm's qualifications pertaining to expertise and practice in the construction of gas monitoring Wells, testing of gas monitoring wells, and the preparation of well reports. How long in business and size of firm. Consultant may submit the Firm's "Statement of Qualifications" with the proposal to satisfy this requirement. 2. Name, Background, and Experience of proposed Project Manager. The proposed Project Manager must have an extensive background in and knowledge of the construction of gas monitoring wells; the selected Consultant for the project will offer a Project Manager who has the appropriate experience, a track record of completing projects on time and within budget, has a sense of urgency, strong work ethic and dedication to an assigned project. Provide list of projects completed by the PM which are similar to the proposed work and provide corresponding client references with current telephone numbers who worked closely with the Project Manager. The Consultant will not be allowed to change the assigned Project Manager unless prior approval from the City has been obtained. City will reserve the right to have Consultant assign another Project Manager should execution of the work not proceed in a satisfactory manner. Demonstrate Understanding of Scope-of-Work. Consultants shall demonstrate that they have a full understanding of the Scope-of- Work and the effort needed to complete the project on time and within budget. Prospective and interested Consultants are invited to visit the site and inspect the Landfill records. It will be necessary for the Consultant to check in with the Gate Attendant and show identification prior to site inspection. No one except Page 5 of 10 e . inspectors from the LEA, California Integrated Waste Management Board, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Fish and Game are permitted to tour the Landfill without checking in with the Gate Attendant. The City will make every effort to provide a Staff member to accompany Consultant's staff, however, depending upon Landfill Staff's workload, it maybe necessary for Consultant to review site independently. A list of prospective Consultants will be provided to the Gate Attendant; bring business card as means of identification. A sketch depicting locations of gas monitoring wells, is attached to this RFP for Consultants reference. The Landfill records will be made available to prospective and interested Consultants for inspection at City Hall. Considering the number of Consultants who have shown an interest in this project, it is advisable that Consultant make an appointment by calling Sue Goodrick, Public Works Administrator at (707) 463-6286, or Kathy Kinch, Public Works Secretary at (707) 463-6214. Four (4) hour time periods will be allocated to each Consultant, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. We regret that copies of documents will not be provided due to cost and time. A detailed Scope-of-Work by task has been included in this RFP as Attachment "A". Considerable effort has been made to provide sufficient detail in the Scope- of-Work to permit prospective Consultants to prepare a proposal without the need to consult with the Landfill Operator. Consultants are advised that Landfill Operator may not be available at convenient times to field questions by telephone. Should questions arise during the RFP period, it is advisable that you fax your questions well in advance of the proposal due date. FAX number (707) 463-6204 Work Schedule. Consultants shall include in their Proposal a proposed work schedule which shall indicate duration and completion dates for work tasks and any appropriate sub- tasks or phases. All tasks shall be completed to facilitate the completion of the five gas wells by October 15, 1996 and the report of well installation and initial monitoring results by November 1, 1996, assuming contract award on August 7, 1996. Proposed Compensation Compensation for performing the work of the contract shall be on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed maximum amount. Consultants shall include in their cost proposal a guaranteed maximum amount for compensation and a listing of their standard hourly rates for each profession, position, function or trade involved in the work and standard fees for typical expenses. Consultants shall also provide budget totals for each Task for progress payment purposes. Page 6 of 10 Ce Consultants guaranteed maximum compensation shall be made on the premise that the gas monitoring wells will be drilled to the depths indicated in the "Introduction" section of this Request for Proposal. Consultant shall include in their proposed compensation an additional cost per feet of well bore drilled which will be applied to any additional footage drilled beyond the total sum of footage indicated in the Introduction Section of this Request for Proposal (560 feet). The additive cost per foot of well bore drilled will not be applied to each individual well. Progress payments will be made on a monthly basis and the total of progress payments for each Task will not exceed 110 percent of the budget amount for the respective Task. Final payment for the work will not exceed a guaranteed maximum amount of the contract. Consultants may submit in their proposal budget amounts for other sub-tasks or sub-phases. The total of all progress payments prior to submittal of the Report of Well Installation and Initial Monitoring Results shall not exceed 95 percent of the maximum total compensation. Final payment will be made within 30 calendar days from the completion of the Report. Pursuant to the Government Code, the award of the consulting contract will not be made solely on the basis of cost, however, cost will be an important factor in the consultant selection process. Refer to Consultant Selection Criteria. Consultants are advised that financial resources available for this project are limited. 6. Proposed Sub-consultants and Contractors Consultants shall list in their proposals proposed sub-consultants and/or contractors which will assist consultant in the performance of the work. Provide brief description of work to be performed by each sub-consultant and/or contractor. 7. Other Information At the Consultant's discretion, other information may be included in the proposal that Consultant deems appropriate to highlight the Firm's experience and its ability to perform the work of the contract within the time period allowed. Consultant Selection Criteria Proposals received on or prior to July. 19, 1996, at 5:00 p.m. will' be reviewed and ranked based on the following criteria: Page 7 of 10 1. Adequate resources to perform the work within the time required. , Knowledge of and experience in the construction of gas wells and preparation of reports either by Firm, Project Manager or Project team. Number of projects completed satisfactorily and degree of customer satisfaction. Track record for completing projects on time and within budget. . Proposed Compensation. Are rates and fees reasonable. Is Proposed Guaranteed Maximum Compensation in line with available financial resources. The rating will be performed by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and discussed with the City Manager. Because of time constraints, there will be no formal consultant interviews. A report to City Council recommending consultant selection and contract award will be prepared on July 31, 1996, for action by Council on August 7, 1996. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to City policy, it will be necessary that the successful Consultant obtain the following insurance coverages and limits for this project: .~ . General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. . Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. . Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker's compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. · Professional Liability: Not less than $500,00 and shall remain in force for two (2) years after completion of Consultant's work product and acceptance by City· Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City officers, agents, and employees from and against all claims, demands, liability, costs and expenses, including court costs and counsel fees, arising out of the injury to or death of any person or loss of or physical damage to any property resulting from any negligent or wrongful act or omission committed by Consultant or its officers, agents or Page 8 of 10 employees while performing the services under the contract. Insurers must have a Best's Rating of no less than B+, Class 10 or better and admitted insurers in the State of California, excepting the professional liability insurer. Any questions concerning the City's insurance requirements should be directed to Mike Harris, Assistant City Manager/Risk Manager at (707) 463-6287. Page 9 of 10 · CONSULTANT AGREEMENT The successful Consultant will be required to enter into a written contract with the City prior to performing the proposed work. The contract will be prepared by the City and the contract must be executed by the Consultant on or prior to August 16, 1996 in order to facilitate a start date of August 19, 1996. A sample Professional Consulting Services Agreement is on file at the Department of Public Works and is available for inspection. In recognition of the efforts and resources required to prepare an adequate proposal and the short duration in which the proposal is to be prepared, consultants are encouraged to keep the proposal "basic" and to the point; high quality graphics, etc., and voluminous proposals are not necessary. We look forward in receiving your proposal. ~rel~ _ .,~ Director of Public Works/City'Engineer Landfill Operator B:I~.FP GMMW.RFP Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT "A" SCOPE-OF-WORK PROJECT OBJE(~TIVE The completion of a perimeter, landfill gas migration monitoring network all in accordance with the City's approved "Landfill Gas Monitoring System Proposal" dated August, 1996, and Title 14, CCR. WORK REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PROJECT OBJECTIVES Although required gas well depths and proposed and preferred locations have been provided by the City, it will be necessary for the consultant to review available topographic maps of the landfill, to inspect the site to become familiar with the proposed gas well locations for purposes of ensuring that access to the proposed locations can be achieved by appropriate drilling equipment, and to review the Landfill Gas Monitoring System Proposal, geologic information, measured groundwater levels within applicable groundwater monitoring wells, and other landfill records to ensure that gas wells are constructed in accordance with Title 14, CCR, requirements. It will be necessary for the consultant to provide an Engineering Geologist who shall be present at the job site at all times when drilling of the gas wells are in progress for purposes of making drilling logs, describing soils using the ASTM D2488-84 method, and for providing general instructions to the consultant's driller. Consultant shall hire the services of a licensed drilling contractor who has the proper drilling equipment that can accommodate the rough terrain and that can drill to the required depths. The drilling contractor shall decontaminate the drilling equipment in accordance with accepted standards and practices. Consultant must provide all materials and labor necessary to complete and secure each gas well all in accordance with the approved landfill gas migration well typical detail. Consultant shall apply and secure the required well permits from the County of Mendocino Health Department and City shall pay for the well permit fees directly. After the construction of the gas wells are completed, consultant shall purge, measure and record levels of methane gas and oxygen (both gases in percent by volume) and soil gas pressure for each gas probe. Measurements are to be taken with the use of a Gastech 19390X Landfill gas analyzer or equivalent measuring equipment and probe pressures shall be recorded in inches of water column. Barometric pressure in inches of mercury shall also be recorded as well as ambient air temperature. After the completion of well construction and initial monitoring, the consultant shall prepare a report entitled, "Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring", which shall include descriptions of the work completed including the manner in which it was completed, the boring Page 1 of 2 logs and as-built details and the results of the initial monitoring. Five (5) copies of the final Report are to be submitted to the City. Boring logs shall be presented in a manner and style similar to the typical log included in Attachment "I". SCOPE-OF-WORK BY TASK TASK I: Review phase to gain full understanding and knowledge of landfill conditions prior to the drilling of the gas wells. Secure well permits. TASK II: Drilling and construction of five gas monitoring wells. TASK III' Initial monitoring of all gas probes. TASK IV: Preparation and submittal of the final "Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring." Five (5) copies to the City. B:ILRFP OMMW.RFP Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE The following schedule by Work Task has been assumed by the City. Request for Proposal Proposal Due Date Recommendation for Award Award Consultant Contract Consultant Executes Contract Consultant Begins Works June 17, 1996 July 19, 1996 July 31, 1996 August 7, 1996 August 16, 1996 August 19, 1996 Task I Task II Task III Task IV Weeks of August 19 and 26, 1996 Weeks of September 16, 23, and 30, 1996 Week of October 7, 1996 Weeks of October 14 and 21, 1996 Consultant submits final Report to City October 28, 1996. Page of 1 of 1 LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES Civil Engineering · Engineering Geology · Ground-iVater Hydrology C96.06.08B July 17, 1996 Mr. Rick Kennedy DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 De.ar Mr. Kennedy: SUBJECT: PROPOSAL: CONSTRUCTION/TESTING OF FIVE (5) GAS- MONITORING WELLS AND PREPARATION OF REPORTS, UKIAH SOLID WASTE LANDFILL Enclosed is our proposal to install and test five landfill-gas monitoring wells at the Ukiah Solid Waste Landfill and submit a report of findings. Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this project. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, · Gartner Certified Engineering Geologist 1756 2001 Market Street, Room 523, Redding, California 96001 Phone: (916) 244-9703 Fax: (916) 244-5021 City of Ukiah Five Landfill-Gas Monitoring Wells July 17, 1996 Page 1 of 4 INTRODUCTION This document serves as a technical and cost proposal for installing five landfill-gas monitoring wells at the Ukiah Solid Waste Landfill, and providing a report of findings, as outlined in the Request for Proposal to Construct Five Gas Migration Monitoring Wells and Prepare Report of Well Installation and Initial Monitoring (RFP), issued by the City of Ukiah Department of Public Works, dated June 17, 1996. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND RESOURCES Lawrence & Associates is a firm specializing in environmental engineering, geology, and hydrology. We have been in business since 1976 and have performed landfill-related work since the early 1980's. Our main office is in Redding, California, and a second office is in Medford, Oregon. We have a staff of 14, including the following personnel: 3 Certified Engineering Geologists 1 Registered Geologist 2 Staff Geologists 2 Registered Civil Engineers 1 Engineer-in-training / construction inspector 2 Drilling crew / technical staff 3 Support staff We perform work in several principal areas: Landfill Design Landfill planning, design, construction, and operations Air sampling Landfill gas monitoring and design Ground-water monitoring and treatment Ground Water Hydrology Safe-yield studies Municipal well design Water rights Aquifer development Water quality, monitoring and treatment Hazardous-waste investigation and cleanup Aboveground and underground storage tanks Soil & ground-water remediation Citing of remediation facilities Drilling Contract drilling using a CME-55 hollow-stem auger rig Lawrence & Associates City of Ukiah Five Landfill-Gas Monitoring Wells July 17, 1996 Page 2 of 4 Lawrence & Associates has installed landfill-gas monitoring wells at the following California locations: Anderson Solid Waste Landfill, Anderson Benton Landfill, Redding , Eastern Regional Landfill, Truckee Dersch Road Landfill, Anderson Meadow Vista Landfill, Meadow Vista Western Regional Landfill, Lincoln PROJECT MANAGER Bryan Gartner will serve as the project manager. Mr. Gartner is a California Registered Geologist, Certified Engineering Geologist, and Certified Hydrogeologist. Mr. Gartner has over 12 years of experience as a practicing geologist, of which nearly 8 years have been spent as a project manager with Lawrence & Associates. Mr. Gartner has supervised and/or logged the installation of landfill-gas monitoring wells at numerous landfills, all on schedule and within budget. Landfill-gas monitoring well projects completed by Mr. Gartner include: 1. Anderson Solid Waste Landfill, Mr. Rick Morton, (916) 347-5236 2. Benton Landfill, City of Redding, Mr. Ron Masingale, (916) 225-4090 3. Dersch Road Landfill, Simpson Paper Company, Mr. Ross Bell, (916) 365-2711 4. Eastern Regional Sanitary Landfill, Placer County, Mr. T.D. Martin (916) 889-7563 SCOPE OF WORK Task I - Permits and Preliminary Evaluation As part of the proposal process, Lawrence & Associates staff has already obtained drilling logs of the existing gas-monitoring wells, conducted reconnaissance of drilling locations, and reviewed other related landfill-gas data on file with the City of Ukiah to develop a thorough understanding of site geology and landfill conditions. Therefore, the only necessary portions of this task remaining are obtaining well permits, which will be obtained from the Mendocino Department of Environmental Health, and preparation of an in-house site-safety plan for use during well installation. Task II - Install Wells It is understood that the project consists of installing five landfill-gas monitoring wells at the Ukiah Solid Waste Landfill, in accordance with the RFP. The wells are to be Lawrence & Associates City of Ukiah Five Landfill-Gas Monitoring Wells July 17, 1996 Page 3 of 4 installed within 1,000 feet of each other at the locations shown in Attachment "C" of the RFP: GAS-6, GAS-7ALT, GAS-8ALT, GAS-9, and GAS 10. The wells will be constructed as shown on Attachment "G" of the RFP, except 3/4-inch PVC casing and screen will be substituted for the designated 1/2-inch PVC casing and screen because the existing gas-monitoring wells are 3/4-inch diameter. The well screen will be 0.040-inch slot size, the gravel will consist of 3/8-inch pea gravel, and bentonite chips will be installed as the seal material. The well boring will be 7-7/8-inch diameter, and be drilled using the air-rotary method. The wells will be installed under the supervision of a California Certified Engineering Geologist and Registered Geologist. It is understood that the City of Ukiah will have a "D8" bulldozer available to assist the drilling rig with access to the drilling location, particularly to location GAS-8ALT. Task III - Monitor Wells This task will involve the initial monitoring of all 15 gas probes in five gas-monitoring wells. Sampling of the gas wells will be by a Gas-Tech "Landfill Gas Monitor" Model 1939OX or equivalent that measures methane and oxygen. The detection limit for methane is 1 ppm by volume for this instrument. Personnel conducting the sampling will use the following procedures: 1. Before purging and sampling, soil-gas pressure will be measured with a water manometer (inches or millimeters; measuring in millimeters usually is more sensitive for soil gas). The manometer tubing will be attached to the probe fitting, then the ball valve will be opened. The measurement will be recorded to the nearest 1 mm of water. The ball valve will be closed, and then the manometer tubing removed. 2. The purge pumP tubing will be attached to the probe fitting, and the ball valve opened. The pump will be turned on, and allowed to purge gas out of the probe for the appropriate time period (30 minutes for a 100-foot probe assuming a flow of approximately 4 liters/minute). o After purging, the methane and oxygen content of the soil gas will be measured either (A) by attaching the gas monitor inlet directly to the probe fitting or (B) by collecting a sample in a Tedlar bag (using the purge pump), and then attaching the gas monitor to the Tedlar bag. If there is not too great a vacuum in the probe after purging the gas monitor will be attached directly to the probe. . The methane and oxygen readings will be recorded on the sample-data sheet, along with any pertinent observations. The weather conditions, ambient air temperature, barometric pressure, sampler name, and date will also be recorded. Task IV- Reporting Well logs, as-built details, and results of initial monitoring will be compiled in a written report and submitted to the City of Ukiah. Lawrence & Associates City of Ukiah Five Landfill-Gas Monitoring Wells July 17, 1996 Page 4 of 4 WORK SCHEDULE Contract Award August 16, 1996 ..!.: ...... .................. ...................................................................... II. Installation of Gas WellsOctober 4, 1996 III. Testing of Gas Wells October 11, 1996 IV. Completion of Final Report i October 28, 1996 COST ESTIMATE A not-to-exceed cost estimate based on time and materials is presented in Appendix A. Additional costs per feet of well bore drilled in excess of the maximum specified in the RFP (560 feet) are also shown in Appendix A. A fee schedule of standard rates is provided in Appendix B. PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Lawrence & Associates will utilize Weeks Drilling of Ukiah and Sebastopol, C-57 Drilling Contractor's License No. 177681, to drill and install the gas-monitoring wells. OTHER INFORMATION Lawrence & Associates is itself a licensed well driller (C-57 539447), and is experienced in the business of subcontracting and working with a variety of drilling companies. Lawrence & Associates has the advantage of being a small yet well-staffed firm with the ability to complete tasks within very short time frames. Lawrence & Associates / , COST ESTIMATE City of Ukiah Five Landfill-Gas Monitoring Wells July 17, 1996 Page 1 of 1 Item Unit Qty Task I - Preparation Associate Geologist, obtain permits, prepare Hr 5 in-house site-safety plan Permit fees Ea 5 5% administration on permit fees Task I Subtotal Task II - Install Wells Mobilization Ls 1 Air-rotary rig and crew Hr 38 Overtime for 2-man crew Hr 6 Subsistence for 2-man crew Day 4 Travel for crew and service truck Hr 4 Hot pressure washer and generator Week 1 Grout-pump rental Well 5 Gravel delivery Well 5 Blank 3/4-inch Sch 80 flush-thread PVC Ft 600 casing 0.040-slot 3/4-inch Sch 80 flush-thread PVC Ft 400 screen 3/4-inch slip caps Ea 15 PVC ball valve, nylon nipple Ea 15 Cement Bag 22 Bentonite chips Bag 22 Steel risers with lockable lids Ea 5 3/8-inch pea gravel yd3 9 7.25% sales tax on materials 5% admin, on outside drilling services Associate Geologist, travel, log holes Hr 48 Associate Geologist, per diem Day 4 Mileage Mi 400 Task II Subtotal Task III - Test Wells Assistant Geologist, travel, purge, measure, Hr 16 sample, and test gas probes Assistant Geologist, per diem Day 1 Mileage Mi 350 Stainless-steel/Teflon air pump Day 1 Methane/oxygen instrument rental Ls 1 Task III Subtotal Task IV - Reporting Associate Geologist, prepare logs and report Hr 24 Principal Geologist, review logs and report Hr 1 Clerical, edit and reproduce report Hr 4 Task IV Subtotal NOT-TO-EXCEED TOTAL Cost/foot of well bore drilled (over 560 feet): Item Unit Cost/foot of well bore drilled over 560 feet Ft S/unit Item $ $70.00 $ 350.00 $218.00 $1,090.00 $54.50 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $250.00 $9,500.00 $25.00 $150.00 $125.00 $ 500.00 $50.00 $ 200.00 $250.00 $ 250.00 $60.00 $ 300.00 $80.00 $ 400.00 $1.75 $1,050.00 $2.50 $1,000.00 $1.00' $ 15.00 $20.00 $ 300.00 $8.50 $ 187.00 $10.00 $ 220.00 $85.00 $ 425.00 $35.00 $ 315.00 $ 233.96 $ 788.05 $70.00 $3,500.00 $75.00 $ 300.00 $0.35 $140.00 $65.00 $1,040.00 $75.00 $ 75.00 $0.35 $140.00 $35.00 $ 35.00 $300.00 $ 300.00 $70.00 $1,680.00 $85.00 $ 85.00 $35.00 $ 140.00 Qty S/unit $14.70 $1,494.50 $20,774.01 $1,590.00 $1.905.00 $25,763.51 Lawrence & Associates I LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES Civil Engineering · Engineering Geology · Ground. Water Hydrology SCHEDULE OF FEES Attachment B Professional Services Engineering Geologist/Hydrologist Principal .................. ., ..... ., ......... : ..................................... $85/hour Senior ............................................................................ $75/hour Associate ....................................................................... $70/hour Assistant ........................................................................ $65/hour Engineer Senior registered civil ..................................................... $80/hour Associate civil ................................................................ $70/hour Assistant civil ................................................................. $65/hour AutoCAD operator ..................................................................... $50/hour Technical .................................................................................... $45/hour Clerical ....................................................................................... $35/hour Deposition and Court Appearances Minimum charge ......................................................................... $900 part or full day Preparation at consulting-service rates ......................................... as listed above Drilling Services (CME-55 drilling rig) 7-5/8 and 9-5/8-inch OD augers xvith operator and helper ............ $135/hour Mobilization (plus mileage) ......................................................... $90/hour Other In-House Equipment Test pumps (submersible, through 5 HP) ..................................... quoted/job Campbell 2 IX dataloggers xv/transducers (water and gas) .......... quoted/job Conductivity, oxygen, temperature and dissolved oxygen probes .. quoted/job Meteorological station (wind direction and velocity) .................... quoted/job Gas-extraction and air-monitoring pumps .................................... quoted/job Mileage (other than drilling rig) ................................................... $0.35 Mileage (drilling rig) ................................................................... $0.45 Cellular phone ............................................................................ $0.50/minute Per diem (per person/day) ........................................................... $75/day Level D protection (per person/day) ............................................ $30/day Level C protection (per person/day) ............................................. $50/day Expenses, Materials, Outside Services (All direct-job related expenses: reproduction, rental equipment, materials, subcontracted labor and equipment) ............................ at cost + 15% DL: D:ICORP~EESCHD~rVEES. DOC LAST UPDATE: 7-Mar-96 2001 Market Street, Room 523, Redding, California 96001 Phone: (916) 244-9703 Fax: (916) 244-5021 mcon 1433 North Market Boulevard · Sacramento, California 95834-1943 · (916) 928-3300 · Fax (916) 928-3341 July 16, 1996 Proposal P96-070.24 Mr. Rick Kennedy, P.E Department of Public Works City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 Re: Proposal to Construct Five Gas Migration Monitoring Wells and Prepare Report of Well Installation and Initial Monitoring Dear Mr. K~nnedy: EMCON is pleased to submit this proposal to you for gas well installation, testing, and reporting at the Ukiah Landfill, Ukiah, California. Based upon our understanding of this project, our previous gas monitoring services at other sites, and the information obtained at a June 27, 1995, site visit, we have assembled a project team, designed a work program, and provided a time schedule that we believe is.particularly responsive to your budget. Our scope of work reflects the 'scope of services outlined in your Request for Proposal. We believe EMCON is the most qualified' fh'm for your project for the following reasons: Experience. EMCON has solid waste design and landfill gas experience in 55 of California's 58 counties. As a company, EMCON and the key personnel proposed for your project have taken landfill gas projects from conceptual design through installation and monitoring. This experience has given us the opportunity to work frequently and directly with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), North Coast Region, and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). Project Approach. Our goal is to install the gas wells at a minimal cost. - EMCON has prepared several landfill monitoring plans at landfills with potential gas migration problems. We also have a good working relationship with Bob Anderson of the CIWMB. - EMCON has considerable experience in the installation and testing of landfill gas wells and uses this experience to develop a cost-effective plan. SA(XN :XPROXP96XP9607024.BS-96Xpas: 1 Mr. Rick Kennedy, P.E. July 16, 1996 Page 2 Proposal P96-070.24 - EMCON understands the importance of properly installed gas wells as we monitor several dozen gas probes each quarter. Uniquely Qualified Project Team. We have committed our most qualified key technical and management staff to this project. - J.C. Ishmn, EMCON's Geology Manager for Solid Waste Services in our Sacramento office, will serve as Project Manager. Mr. Isham brings 22 years of experience to this project. He has managed several gas well programs. - Dave Foley, Field Engineering Geologist, will be responsible for the installation of the gas wells. Mr. Foley has installed over 200 monitoring wells and over two dozen gas probes. We believe that with our positive experience and enthusiastic commitment on similar projects, our understanding of the local and regional issues and regulatory constraints, and our service-oriented approach to quality engineering, EMCON is the most qualified team for this assignment. We look forward to the opportunity to direct our efforts towards this project. Please contact me at the number above if you require further information. Sincerely, Attachment: Proposal for the Ukiah Landfill SA C~,N:XPROX/~6xP9607024 .BS-96Xoas: ! EmCOfl 3 SCOPE OF WORK, AND ASSUMPTIONS AND CONTINGENCIES 3.1 Scope of Work The following scope of work is divided into four tasks. Task I consists of costs associated with prefield activities. Task 2 consists of landfill gas (LFG) probe installation activities. Task 3 consists of initial monitoring of all gas probes. Task 4 consists of the preparation and submittal of the final report. 3.1.1 Task 1 - Prefield Activities All EMCON geologist visited the site to assess site conditions at the proposed probe locations. EMCON will obtain the necessary drilling permits from the Mendocino County Division of Environmental Health (MCDEH) and prepare a site-specific health and safety plan before field work begins. E.XlCON will also schedule the drilling contractor (Weeks Drilling & Pump Co., Inc., of Ukiah) and arrange for probe construction materials. 3.1.2 Task 2-Installation of Gas Probes EMCON will use Weeks Drilling and Pump Co., Inc., for drilling of the borings and installation of the LFG probes. Due to access constraints, EMCON proposes to drill at the alternative locations for probes GAS-7 and GAS-8. EMCON proposes to drill five soil borings and convert the borings to triple-level LFG monitoring probes, unless distinct permeable zones identified hi the boring require additional monitoring intervals. The proposed boring depths will range from approximately 30 to 245 feet below ground surface. LFG probe GAS-6 will be located inside the entrance to the landfill. Probes GAS-7 ALT and GAS-8 ALT through GAS-10 will be located north of the intermittent creek. The borings will be drilled using 7 7/8-inch-diameter air rotary drilling equipment and converted to triple-level LFG probes by installing 1/2-inch-diameter schedule 80 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) casing with O.020-inch factory slot. The top of casing will be fitted with a PVC cap with a barbed hose connector. The probe top of casing for each monitoring interval will be staggered in height to correspond with the depth of the probe (top of the SACXN:'XPR~607024.AS-96Xdls:2 Rev. 2, 7/17/96 3-1 .EMCON deepest probe will be lower than the other two probes in the protective monument). The probes will also be color coded (yellow = shallow, red = medium, blue = deep). The screen section of the casing will extend the entire length of the monitoring interval. The probe annulus adjacent to the top of the screen section for each monitoring interval will extend approximately 1 foot above the top of the pert'orations and will be backfilled with pea gravel (see Table 1 at the end of this section for proposed LFG probe installation data). Each monitoring interval will be separated by an approximately 5-foot-thick hydrated bentonite seal. An 8-inch-diameter steel monument will be installed to protect the probe assembly. Drilling equipment will be steam cleaned between boring locations. Probes will be fabricated and installed in conformance with the requirements for perimeter LFG monitoring contained in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 14. An EMCON engineering geologist will log the borings, as required by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). 3.1.3 Task 3 - Initial Monitoring of Gas Well The EMCON geologist will perform one initial monitoring of the probes after installation, prior to leaving the site. The probes will be purged of one annular space volume, using a diaphragm pump, before field measurements are collected. Methane gas and oxygen (in percent by volume) and soil gas pressure for each probe will be measured. Measurements will be collected using a GasTech 1939 OX Landfill gas analyzer, and probe pressure will be recorded in inches of water column. Barometric pressure in inches of mercurs.' will also be measured, as well as ambient air temperature. 3.1.4 Task 4- Report Preparation and Submittal EMCON will prepare a letter report summarizing the probe installation procedures and the initial LFG probe monitoring results. Logs of exploratory borings and well construction information will also be included. The report will be submitted to the CiD' of Ukiah Department of Public Works by the November 1, 1996, deadline. 3.2 Assumptions and Contingencies EMCON will contact Underground Service Alert (USA) for underground utility locations near the entrance of the disposal site. No costs for any additional utility locator services are included in this proposal. Ukiah Solid Waste Disposal Facility (USWDF) will also provide access to the probe drilling sites. Surveying and precise coordinates and elevations for the installed probe locations are not included in this scope of work. SAC N:~PR~607024.A S -06Mis:2 3 -2 Rev. g. 7/17/96 EMCON We assume that the drilling spoils will be uncontaminated and acceptable for on-site disposal at the USWDF Landfill. No costs for disposal of the drilling spoils have been included in the cost estimate for this proposal. Additional costs for unforeseen underground conditions are not included in this cost estimate. S ACXN:XPRO",P96XP9607024.A S -96M15:2 Rev. 2, 7/17196 3-3 'EMCON 4 BUDGET AND PROJECT SCHEDULE 4.1 Budget The estimated cost to perform the proposed work is $27,265 (see Table 2). Additional costs for drilling beyond the assumed depths will be charged at $28.00 per foot. Charges for work that is not part of the proposed scope of work are not included in the budget estimate. Illl Task 1 PrefieM Activities: Task 2 LFG Probe Installation Activities: Task 3 Initial Monitoring of All Gas Probes: Task 4 Report Preparation: Table 2 Estimated Project Budget Description Permits Geologists (prepare permits, contact USA, procure materials) Health & Safety Plan Task 1 Subtotal Drilling contractor (Weeks Drilling) Professional Services Materials Per Diem Task 2 Subtotal Geologist Equipment Task 3 Subtotal Professional Services Total Cost Estimate Cost Estimate $1,250 $430 $195 $1,875 $15,600 $4,200 $2,185 $400 $22,385 $730 $85 $815 $2.190 $27,265 S AC'hN:~PROXtX)6XI9607024.A S .96Mis :2 Rev. 2, 7/17/96 4-1 EMCON THE MARK /,(~ GROUP, INC. .~ ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS ' i?[~lj : July 19, 1996 ~,--, ,,.If 96-11117P3.01 Department of Public Works City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Drive Ukiah, CA 95482 Attention: Mr. Rich Kennedy, Director of Public Works Subject: PROPOSAL - Construction of Five Gas Monitoring Preparation of Reports Wells and Dear Mr. Kennedy: The MARK Group, Inc. (MARK) is pleased to submit one (1) copy of the attached proposal for the construction of five gas monitoring wells and the preparation of a well construction report. MARK has combined resources of over 30 professionals in three offices located in Pleasant Hill, Sacramento, and Santa Ana, California. Our team members are seasoned solid waste professionals with extensive experience in all aspects of contaminate migration from landfills. The MARK Team is particularly well qualified to perform this work for the following reasons: Understanding of the Required Services. The MARK Team's technical approach and scope of work realistically reflects the situation and addresses the requirements in a way that' is both technically proficient and cost-effective. Our approach to this project will be very straightforward. We propose to install five monitoring wells (GAS-6, GAS-7ALT, GAS-8ALT, GAS-9, GAS-10) at the approximate locations and depths provided in the RFP. Weeks Drilling & Pump (Weeks) will install the wells using an all-terrain, air rotary drill rig. Weeks is knowledgeable of the site, having installed the gas migration monitoring wells on the south side of the landfill. Mr. James M. Herbert of our staff, a certified engineering geologist, and will be present at the job site during drilling activities. Design/Build/Operate Experience. MARK has been designing/building/operating active gas collection systems since 1984. This experience lends a level of practicality and cost effectiveness not often available from "design-only" firms. Experienced Personnel. Our Team's proposed Project Manager, Mr. Thomas C. Reilly, P.E., has twenty years of experience as a solid waste engineering professional. His solid waste experience includes work for the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), directing the operations of Acme Fill Corporation, owner and operator of a large California landfill and transfer station, and managing various solid waste projects for consulting firms. He has project experience in solid waste facility evaluations, engineering and permitting. Mr. Reilly 3480 Buskirk Avenue · Suite 120 · Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 ° (510) 946-1055 · FAX (510) 946-9813 July 19, 1996 96-11117P2.01 Department of Public Works City of Ukiah Attention: Subject: Page 2 Mr. Rich Kennedy, Director of Public Works' PROPOSAL - Construction of Five Preparation of Reports Gas Monitoring Wells and is familiar with the suite of regulations which guide the design, operation, and closure of landfills and associated monitoring systems. Mr. Reilly has managed numerous projects which have required the design and installation of monitoring wells. He has proven to be highly responsive and experienced in performing under budgetary and scheduling constraints. To ensure timely completion of this project, Mr. Reilly will be supported by a team of seasoned solid waste professionals. Regulatory Insight. We are intimately familiar with the suite of federal, state, and local regulations which govern solid waste management, and have considerable expertise in a wide spectrum of regulatory matters. Out Team members are well known and respected by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), various'Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) located throughout California, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the local regulatory agencies of California cities and counties. These relationships have proven invaluable in undertaking and completing projects for our clients. The Team has provided similar services to numerous landfill owners and operators, and understands the required goals, needs, and project constraints. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Ukiah, Department of Public Works, and we look forward to working with you and your staff. Also, we encourage you to contact the references listed in our proposal. If you have any questions regarding our proposal Or if there is any other area in which we might be of assistance, please call either Mr. Thomas C. Reilly, P.E., or the undersigned. Sincerely, The MARK Group, Inc. Principal UKIAHP3.LTR DKR:TCR:blm Enclosure: Proposal (1) o o o on'.or- u) o ~-~ ~ o o 'ID ~ o · ,, SECTION FIVE SCOPE OF WORK 5.1 Task 1 Information Review We will review all pertinent data not now in our possession, as identified in Attachment "A" of the RFP. We will also secure the required well permits. 5.2 Task 2 Installation of Five Gas Monitoring Wells We will install five monitoring wells (GAS-6, GAS-7ALT, GAS-8ALT, GAS-9, and GAS- 10) at the approximate locations provided in the RFP and shown in Drawing 1. The wells will be installed with Weeks Drilling and Pump Company using an all-terrain air-rotary drill rig. The wells will be constructed in accordance with Title 14, CCR requirement and as shQwn in Drawing 2. The approximate depths of each well are shown in the table below. 5-1 · COMPANY CONFIDENTLAL · TRADE ~2RET AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF TH~ MARK GROUP. INC.' · Gas Well Ground Surface at Gas Well at MSL GAS-6 850 GAS-7ALT 775 GAS-8ALT 942 Assumed Lowest Assumed Depth Groundwater of Gas Well Lowest Refuse Elevation at MSL Below Ground Depth at MSL (Interpolated) Surface in Feet 775 =715 135 695 ~-680 95 710 ~700 245 GAS-9 760 GAS-10 795 730 =740 30 745 ~740 55 Total Footage to be Drilled 560 Feet Mr. James M. Herbert of our staff is a certified engineering geologist and will be present at the job site during drilling activities. 5.3 Task 3 Initial Monitoring of Gas Probes After the construction of the monitoring wells is completed, we will purge, measure and record levels of methane gas and oxygen (both gases in percent by volume) and soil gas pressure for each gas probe. Measurements will be taken with the use of a GastechTM 19390X Landfill Gas Analyzer or equivalent measuring equipment and probe pressures will be recorded in inches of water column. Barometric pressure in inches of mercury will also be recorded as well as ambient air temperature. All data will be recorded on field logs. 5.4 Task 4 Preparation and Submittal of Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring After the completion of well construction and initial monitoring, we will prepare a report entitled, "Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring," which will include descriptions of the work completed including the manner in which it was completed, the boring logs and "as-built" details and the results of the initial monitoring. Five copies of the final report will be submitted to the City. Boring logs will be presented in a manner and style similar to the typical log included in Attachment "I" of the RFA. 5-2 $ C~OMPANY CONI~DENTIAL · TRADE ~ AND PROPRIEfARY INI:ORMATION OF TH~ MARK GROUP, INC. · SECTION SEVEN PROPOSED COMPENSATION 7.1 Estimated Costs An estimate of the labor costs and expenses required to complete the proposed scope of work by task is presented in Table 1. We have estimated the costs for installing the five wells and submitting a well completion report to be around $27,500. Most of these costs are for the drilling and installation of the wells. 7.2 Cost Management Through our extensive experience providing time-and-expense services to city, county, and other public agencies, MARK is familiar with the fiduciary responsibilities to which the client staff are held accountable. As a consequence of our sensitivity to the importance of balancing expenditures with allocated budgets, MARK will adhere strictly to an expense accounting protocol which is outlined as follows: · Establish a detailed budget for each task of work; · Track expenses by task in a manner consistent with the budget; and · Submit monthly progress reports with each invoice. 7-1 · COMPANY CONFIDi~frIAL · TRADE Sr~RI~ AND PROPRIETARy INFORMATION OF TH~ MARK GROUP, INC. · The progress report will provide, on a monthly basis, the following information: · Allocated budget; · Actual expenses to date; Estimate of expenses required to complete each task; and A summary of the adequacy of the existing budget. As part of our budget monitoring procedure, MARK develops detailed cost estimates for each prospective project. These detailed cost estimates provide the basis by which project/budget status can be monitored on a continuing basis. Where discrepancies occur, they can be quickly and clearly identified. At a minimum, you will be notified of project progress and budget status on a monthly basis. The estimates of time and expenses to complete this project are based on the scope of work and on our understanding of site conditions and program requirements. If changes in the scope are required or warranted, the City will be notified and informed of the impact to the budget. No additional work will be performed nor will additional costs be incurred without your direct authorization. The cost for Task 2 is based on our understanding of the project from a review of the available data and our site visit. The cost for Task 2 included in Table 1 is for the total sum of drilled footage indicated in the RFP (560 feet). The compensation for any additional depth drilled beyond 560 feet will be charged at a discounted rate of $35 per foot. The following assumptions were used in developing the cost for this proposal: We plan on using an all-terrain drill rig to access the proposed gas monitoring well locations. Should the all-terrain drill rig have difficulty in accessing any of the locations, we have assumed that the landfill dozer can tow the drill rig to the desired locations; and · Surveying well locations will be the responsibility of the City. 73 Fees, Payments and Conditions We perform our services in accordance with the schedule of "Fees, Payments & Conditions 96/2.1" which is attached in this section and incorporated herein by reference. The schedule also lists our unit charges for personnel and equipment, and surcharges for subcontractors and materials to support the above cited cost estimates. 7-2 · COMPANY OaNFIO~ · TIL~Dii SI~7.RET AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF TIlE MARK GROUP, INC. · i Mort, Jul 15, 1996 96-11 1 1 7P3.01 TABLE 1: ~TASK 1 TASK 2 TASK 3 t TASK 4 SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATES Engineeringt Services Task-Name Data Comp & Review Probe Installation Initial Monitoring of Probes Report Preparation Labor 13 53 9 41 TOTALS 116 Labor Cost $1,160 $4,680 $81o $2,690 $9,340 MARK Expenses $0 $340 $0 $0 $34O Ou~ick~ Costs $0 $17,710 $70 $5O $17,830 Task Total $1,200 $22,700 $900 $2,700 $27,500 ~I~1~ KLEINFELDE'R An employee owned comp,~ny July 19, 1996 File: 10 Yp6328 Mr. Rick Kennedy Department of Public Works City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 SUBJECT: Proposal to Construct Five Gas Monitoring Wells and Prepare Report of Well Installation and Initial Monitoring, City of City of Ukiah Landfill Ukiah, California Dear Rick Kennedy: Kleinfelder is pleased to submit this proposal to construct five gas monitoring wells and prepare a report of well installation and initial monitoring at the City of Ukiah Landfill. This proposal was developed in response to your request for proposals (RFP) dated June 17, 1996. The attached proposal presents a scope of work that responds to the RFP but also presents Kleinfelder's qualifications and experience in the area of landfill gas assessment work and design. We believe that you will find Kleinfelder to be technically qualified and be able to handle its project effectively; on budget, on time, and in close communication with you. Kleinfelder has been providing quality consulting services for 34 years, focusing on three major markets: environmental, geotechnical and materials testing. Environmental services offered by Kleinfelder include solid waste services, environmental site assessments, site characterization, feasibility studies, remedial design, remediation system construction, site restoration, operation and maintenance, hazardous waste management, environmental compliance, water resources, and air quality services. Presently Kleinfelder is providing geotechnical/geological services at the landfill. In this capacity Mr. William V. McCormick, who is the Certified Engineering Geologist that we proposed for this scope of work, has had the opportunity to become familiar with the landfill. We believe that his experience will be valuable in making sure that the field work is handled appropriately and that potentially costly delays are avoided. In addition his experience will allow us to conduct the site review more efficiently thus reducing costs to the City of Ukiah. 10-YP6-328(SP960449)/kk KLEINFELDER 1362 Ridder Park Drive, San Jose, CA 95131 Copyright 1996 Kleinfelder, Inc. (408) 436-1155 Thank you for this opportunity to respond to your solid waste service needs. Kleinfelder appreciates your consideration and we look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to call me at (408) 436-.1155. Or call our Santa Rosa Office at (707) 585-8608 Sincerely, Senior ClienfM~nager Pau! A. B~r~insk'5"P.E. Regional Environmenta[Manager ! 0-YP6-328(SP960449)/kk KLEINFELDER 1362 Ridder Park Drive, San Jose, CA 95131 (408) 436-1155 Copyright 1996 Kleinfelder, Inc. ~ KLEINFELDER ~' -' ~ '~:' '~.:~::~'~ ".?* .~a~i~'~:~":~i~:~! [~.'. :~ .... ............................... ~ii!~!~!~!i;~':? Tim Crandall, PE MSC, Engineering; 13 Extensive experience in solid Proiect Manager BA, Biology wast.e . engifieering, design and · regulation.. Paul Baginski, PE BSC, Engineering . 12 Solid waste and remediation Task Manager BA Environmental engineering and design. Studies Hamlet MS, Geology 16 Design and construction of waste Hamparsumian, PE BS, Architecture management facilities and landfill gas systems. William V. MS, Geology 10 Experienced engineering geologist. McCormick, RG, BS, Geology CEG Paul Derkos BS~ Geology 10 Experienced engineering geologist. SUBCONSULTANTS Kleinfelder sees the need to use two subconsultants as an integral part of the project team. The first is Clearhart Construction, Inc. who is a drilling subcontractor. I will be necessary to use this subcontractor to install the landfill gas wells. Clearhart was chosen for their expertise in the field, as well as for their responsiveness, reliability and existing relationships with Kleinfelder. SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1 Data Review and Permit Acquisition Kleinfelder will review existing data on landfill gas monitoring well and probe installation (as well as overall landfill conditions and history) to gain an understanding of site conditions. This review is important because the locations and depths of the new probes are based on this information. If field conditions are different than anticipated, the field representative can recognize these differences and make appropriate modifications if he has a good understanding of the site. If Kleinfelder finds that probe depths or locations need to be modified based on the data review or on field conditions, Kleinfelder will make the appropriate modifications after consulting with the City of Ukiah and gaining their approval. In addition to reviewing the data Kleinfelder will acquire well permits from the County of Mendocino Health Department. In addition Kleinfelder will coordinate with the City of Ukiah Fire Department as needed. Permit fees will be paid directly by the City of Ukiah. TASK 2 Installation of Gas Monitoring Wells Kleinfelder will install a total of five gas wells at the site. The wells will be installed to various depths as summarized below. In four of the five wells multiple gas probes will be installed as summarized below: 10-YP6-328(SP960449)/kk Page 4 of 6 Copyright 1996 Kleinfelder, Inc. . ~ KLEINFELDER Kleinfelder will subcontract with Weeks Drilling and Pump Co. to install the gas wells. Well installation and soil logging will be overseen by a Certified Engineering Geologist (William V. McCormick). Mr. McCormick will logs the borings in accordance with ASTM D2488-90. In addition, gas well and probe construction will be as shown in Attachment G of the RFP. TASK 3 Initial Monitoring of All Gas Probes After the new gas monitoring wells are installed, (a minimum of 48 hours after installation to allow the probes to equilibrate) landfill gas will be measured from the new probes. The sampling process is as follows: Measure barometric pressure in inches of mercury Measure ambient air temperature Measure the gas pressure in the probes in inches of water column Purge the probe of 2 to 3 casing volumes. Using a combustible gas meter, (Gastech 19390X or equivalent) measure the concentration of methane, carbon dioxide, and oxygen in the landfill gas. TASK 4 Preparation of Final "Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring" Kleinfelder will prepare a report that includes a description of the data review, gas probe installation, gas monitoring results, a comparison of data to State standards, (i.e. 25% of the LEL for methane), and gas well logs and as-built information. Logs will be prepared in a similar manner as presented in Attachment I of the RFP dated June 17, 1996. Kleinfelder will submit five (5) copies of the final report to the City of Ukiah. WORK SCHEDULE Kleinfelder has reviewed the schedule for the scope of work that the City of Ukiah has presented. This schedule is reasonable and Kleinfelder sees no reason not to meet it. The following GANTT chart shows the schedule for the project. 10-YP6-328(SP960449)/kk Page 5 of 6 Copyright 1996 Kleinfelder, Inc. k~ KLEINFELDER PROPOSED COMPSENSATION (Kleinfelder Fee Schedule attached) TASK 1 TASK 2 TASK 3 TASK 4 Data Review and Permit Acquisition Professional Services Installation of Gas Monitoring Wells Professional Services Equipment and Materials *Drilling Subcontractor Initial Monitoring of All Gas Probes Professional Services Equipment and Materials Preparation of Final "Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring" Professional Services $ 1,800.00 $ 5,240.00 $ 560.00 $1,600.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 160.00 $ 2,300.00 TOTAL COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS AND CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES Adequate work space and timely access will be provided. A total of 5 gas monitoring wells (with 14 probes) will be installed and monitored. If the number of wells or probes to be installed and monitored is increased or decreased the costs will be adjusted accordingly. . Depth of the wells will be 9, 126, 135, 145, and 250 feet deep. If the depth to wells is greater or less than the depths proposed then costs may be adjusted accordingly. · Soil and water generated during well installation and equipment decontamination will be discharged to the ground. · Well installation will be performed continuously. Remobilization will result in additional costs. No laboratory samples will be taken or analyzed. If the City of Ukiah requests these services, additional cost will be incurred. *Weeks estimates an additional cost of $14 per foot if depth exceeds 560 feet. 10-YP6-328(SP960449)/kk Page 6 of 6 Copyright 1996 Kleinfelder, Inc. CONSUl-TING ENGINEERS & Gl_. OI_OC, iS'I'S K Jeff l'Jelson, Roland S. Johnson. J~, C,E.G, Reference: 096000.070 July 18, 1996 Mr. Richard H. Kennedy Department of Public Works City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 812 XA4 ~A/abasln f t,, eka. CA 95501-2138 (707) 441 8855 FAX (707) 441-8877 480 } temsted Drive Redding. CA 96002-0117 (916) 221-5424 FAX (916) 221-0135 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT 5 GAS MIGRATION MONITORING WELLS, A~? PREPAR~:....~ASSOCIATED REPORTS for SHN to Thank yot inviting submit this proposal for this important project for the City of Ukiah. As our proposal shows, we have put together a hand-picked team of experienced professionals who have worked extensively in designing and implementing landfill gas programs. For this project, SHN has teamed with Gas Control Engineering (GCE) of Anaheim, California, a firm that specializes in landfill gas remediation, and will use Weeks Drilling and Pump Co. to drill the wells. I will be SHN's project manager and primary contact. In addition, we have a substantial crew of professionals, all of whom are committed to completing the well installation and associated documentation by October 28, 1996. SHN has the resources, experience, and commitment for this work. The City has requested that Certified Engineering Geologist (CEG) be present at the site during drilling to prepare drilling logs and soil descriptions. SHN has carefully reviewed Title 14 regarding personnel licenses required during drilling. Title 14 states that the drilling crew should be under the supervision of the Design Engineer or Engineering Geologist and that wells be logged during drilling by a Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer. SHN proposes that the wells be installed under the supervision of a CEG to conserve costs. The additional costs for having a CEG present (if the City so desires) are shown in the enclosed cost schedule. Costs for drilling the wells have been based on the City's stated depths for the wells. 096000.070~PROPOSAL CONSUUFING ENGII"-IEEi:~,5 & GEOLOGISTS Richard Kennedy Proposal to Install 5 Gas Wells July 18, 1996 Page 2 As the Project Manager for this project, I hereby formally commit to the City of Ukiah to remain an SHN employee until the Ukiah Landfill project is completed. Additionally, SHN hereby commits my time to this project for its duration. Sincerely, SHN ~ONSULTING ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS, INC. Waste Management Director HAW:Ims Enclosure (1) 096000.070~PROPOSAL Based on the Request for Cost Proposal submitted to SHN by the City, SHN proposes the following scope: Conduct a site review and secure well permits Drill and install 5 gas monitoring well nests. · Conduct an initial gas monitoring event of all gas probes. · Prepare a report of findings discussing the result of the field investigation. TASK 1.0 FILE REVIEW A thorough review of all available site information will be conducted in order to gain a full understanding of landfill conditions prior to the drilling and installation of the gas wells. In addition, all necessary well permits will be secured from the Mendocino County Division of Environmental Health. TASK 2.0 VAPOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION Vapor monitoring well nests GAS-6, GAS-7ALT, GAS-8ALT, GAS-9 and GAS-10 will be installed by a state of California licensed drilling contractor utilizing an air-rotary drill rig. Each boring will be drilled under the supervision of a state of California Certified Engineering Geologist. The subsurface lithology of each boring will be logged using ASTM Method D2488-84. Well construction details will be recorded on appropriate forms. The monitoring well nests are proposed to be drilled to the following depths: Probe Number Total Depth Below Ground Surface (in feet) GAS-6 135 GAS-7ALT 95 GAS-8ALT 245 ' GAS-9 30 GAS-10 55 The SHN/GCE team is experienced in gas migration control, extraction, & mitigation. 096000.070\PROPOSAL 6 ._~ J ~ Each well nest (except well nest GAS-9) will contain a deep, middle and shallow gas probe. The bottom 5 feet of each gas probe will be screened with 0.030 inch slotted casing. For each well nest, the probes will be set as follows: The deep probe will be set at the bottom of the boring, the middle probe will be set at one half the depth of the boring, and the shallow probe will be set at a depth of 10 feet below ground surface (BGS). Well nest GAS-9 will be constructed with a shallow and deep probe only. The shallow probe will be set at a depth of approximately 10 feet BGS, and the deep probe will be set at the bottom of the boring (approximately 30 feet BGS). A five foot bentonite seal will be set above each probe screened interval. Each vapor probe will be labeled at the surface for identification purposes. Each well nest will be secured at the surface with a monument style locking protective casing. TASK 3.0 VAPOR PROBE MONITORING Upon completion of the vapor probe installation, each newly installed gas monitoring vapor probe will be purged and subsequently monitored for methane gas, oxygen, and probe pressure. Both gases will be measured in percent by volume, and probe pressure will be measured in inches of water column. Ambient air temperature and barometric pressure will be measured during the vapor probe monitoring. TASK 4.0 REPORT PREPARATION Upon completion of all field activities, including the installation and monitoring of 5 vapor probe monitoring nests, a report entitled" Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring" will be prepared for submittal to the City. The report will include a discussion of all field activities, results of the field investigation, boring logs of each soil boring and · construction details of each vapor monitoring probe nest. Five copies of the final report will be submitted to the City. The SHN/GCE team is experienced in gas migration control, extraction, & mitigation. 0 I- 0 The SHN/GCE team fees for this project will be on a time and expenses, not to exceed basis. Hourly rates for each team member and other associated fees are included on the cost table on the following page. SHN is willing to negotiate a contract with the City of Ukiah prior to performing the work identified in the "Scope of Work." The SHN/GCE team is experienced in gas migration control, extraction, & mitigation. 096000.070\PROPOSAL 'l 5 VAPOR PROBE MONITORING INSTALLATION COST PROPOSAL Department Of Public Works City Of Ukiah, California Budget Summary By Task TASK 1.0 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION/MANAGEMENT $ 1,335 TASK 2.0 VAPOR PROBE INSTALLATION $23,980 TASK 3.0 VAPOR PROBE SAMPLING $ 745 TASK 4.0 REPORT PREPARATION $ 2,788 PROJECT TOTAL $28,848 As stated in the request for bid, the City of Ukiah will pay for all well permits directly. The project total reflects costs of drilling and installing the vapor monitoring wells by SHN staff under the supervision of a Certified Engineering Geologist. If it is required that a Certified Engineering Geologist be on site for the drilling operation, the project total will increase by $1,688 to a total of $33,536. DAMES & MOORE 8801 FOLSOM BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95826 (916) 387-8800 FAX: (916) 387-0802 Department of Public Works City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Attention: Rick H. Kennedy, P.E. July 17, 1996 Re: Proposal Construction of Five Gas Monitoring Wells and Preparation of Reports for City of Ukiah Dear Mr. Kennedy: Dames & Moore is pleased to present this Proposal for construction of five gas monitoring wells and preparation of reports for the Ukiah Landfill. The specific City of Ukiah's needs addressed in this proposal were developed based upon our review of the June 17, 1996 Request for Proposal (RFP), our review of available information and reports, as well as specific site knowledge gathered through out p.revious work at the City of Ukiah Landfill. The proposed Dames & Moore project team is based entirely in Sacramento, and is the same team of professionals which recently completed the "Engineering Feasibility Study of Corrective Action Measures" for the city of Ukiah Landfill. Our team is experienced in construction of gas monitoring wells, testing of gas monitoring, and preparation of well reports under CCR Title 23, CCR, Title 14, and Federal Subtitle D requirements. A recent example of this experience is developing, and implementing landfill gas controls for Class II and Class III facilities at the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. We believe our proposal illustrates the breadth of Dames & Moore's experience and depth of resources available to complete this project for the City of Ukiah. We are confident that we can provide excellent service completely in accordance with your needs with the time allowed. R:\SAC\044MISC\9607_I2.WPG _3 _3 Department of Public Works City of Ukiah July 17, 1996 Page 3 Thank you for the opportunity to present this Proposal. Should you have any questions, please call either of the undersigned at (916) 387-8800. Attachment Sincerely, DAMES & MOORE Associate Engineering Geologist ~Associate Engineer hn D ~awcett, P E R:\SAC\044MISC\9607_ 12. WPG DAMt~S & MOORE Proposal- Construction of Five Gas A4onitoring Wells 3.0 Scope of Work Task I Data Review and Permit Acquisition Task II Drilling and Constructing Five Gas Monitoring Wells Attachment "A" of the City of Ukiah's RFP includes a scope of work. The scope of work was divided into four tasks: Task I-- Task II- Task III- Task IV- Data Review and Permit Acquisition Drilling and Construction of Five Gas Monitoring Wells Initial Monitoring of All Gas Probes Preparation and Submittal of Final "Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring" Dames & Moore is already familiar with the site through our previous work. Therefore, this task will consist of project coordination and permit procurement. Permits will be acquired from the Mendocino Health Department, and we understand that the City will pay for the permits directly. Dames & Moore will contract with Weeks Drilling of Sebastopol, California, to install the gas monitoring wells. Weeks Drilling has an intimate knowledge of the site, as they have installed the majority of the existing wells. The gas monitoring wells will be located as shown on Attachment "C" of the City of Ukiah's RFP. It is understood that all well locations are easily accessible by a truck-mounted drilling rig. Due to the bedrock conditions at the site, all wells will be installed using air rotary drilling techniques. Nested gas monitoring wells will be installed as presented in Attachment "G" of the City of Ukiah's RFP. Monitoring well total depths and number of monitoring probes per well are shown below. · TOtal Depth well Number :: (feet bgS)No, Probes/welI GAS-6 13 5 3 GAS-71 .. :i: : :. 95 3 : · · Gas-8 245 4 Gas..9 · 30 3 Gas-10 55 3 Dames & Moore will provide an Engineering Geologist to be present at the job site at all times when drilling of the gas wells R:gAO044MISC~9607_12.WPG 5 City of Ukiah DAMES Proposal ~ Construction of Five Gas Monitoring Wells _] Task III Initial Monitoring of All Gas Probes Task IV Preparation and Submittal of Final Report 4.0 Schedule is in progress for purposes of constructing drilling logs, describing soils using the ASTM D2488-84 method, and for providing general instructions to the driller. The field Engineering Geologist will be supervised by a State of California-Certified Engineering Geologist. After the construction of the gas wells is completed, Dames & Moore will purge, measure, and record levels of methane gas and oxygen (both gases in percent by volume) and soil gas pressure for each gas probe. Measurements are to be taken with the use of Gastech 19390X Landfill gas analyzer or equivalent measuring equipment, and probe pressures will be recorded in inches of water column. Barometric pressure in inches of mercury will also be recorded, as well as ambient air temperature. All measurements will be recorded on field logs and entered into a computer database at Dames & Moore's office. After the completion of well construction and initial monitoring, Dames & Moore will prepare a report entitled, "Report of Gas Well Construction and Initial Monitoring," which will include descriptions of the work, including the manner in which it was completed, the boring logs and as-built details, and the results of the initial monitoring. Five copies of the final report will be submitted to the City of Ukiah. Boring logs will be presented in a manner and style similar to the typical log included in Attachment "1". Dames & Moore's proposed schedule is shown below. This schedule is contingent upon a contract award date of August 7, 1996, and contract execution on August 16, 1996 Task l Task II Task III Task IV Weeks of August 19 and 26, 1996 Weeks of September 16, 23, and 30, 1996 Week of October 7, 1996 Weeks of October 14 and 21, 1996 The final report will be delivered to the City of Ukiah on October 28, 1996. R:~SAC~44MISC~9607_ 12.WPG 6 City of Ukiah DAME~ & Proposal- Construction of Five Gas Monitoring Wells 5.0 Cost Estimate 6.0 Proposed Subcontractors and Contractors Dames & Moore proposes to perform the work outlined above on a time-and-expenses basis with a guaranteed maximum price for each task, as requested in the RFP. Costs have been estimated for each of the project tasks, and are summarized in the figure below. Task I - Data Review and Permit Acquisition $ 1,453 Task II - Drilling and Constructing Five Gas Monitoring Wells $ 24,635 Task III - Initial Monitoring of All Gas Probes $ 1,396 [.'~ Task IV - Preparation of Final Report $ 3.994 [...] · Proje~ct Total: * 31,478[] Individual cost tables are provided in Appendix C. The cost tables include information on the hourly rates for each individual involved in the work, and estimated fees for expenses. As requested in the RFP costs for drilled footage in excess of the 560 feet anticipated will be billed by the driller and by Dames & Moore on a cost-per-foot basis, as shown below. I Driller ~ 3-probe well (Gas-6, -7, -9, -10) $15.00/foot [] 4-probe well (Gas-8) $17.00/foot ~ .Dames & Moore $10.00/foot ~] It is understood that any adverse field or weather conditions such as rain delays may have an affect on the total cost of the project. Dames & Moore will use the proprietary JRS job reporting system to track budgets and to prepare progress payments. Dames & Moore has all the resources to complete the tasks outlined in scope of work, with the exception of the drilling subcontractor. Our drilling subcontractor will be Weeks Drilling and Pump Company of Sebastopol, California. R:kSAC~044MISC-~9607_ 12.WPG 7 City of Ukiah DAMES & g'IOORE TASK 1' Proiect Review and Permit Acquisition LABOR t Rate I Hours I Amount [ CJCC I Estimate TOTALS PERSONNEL CHARGES Project Manager - Fawcett $112.00 2 $224 $0 $224 $108.00 4 $432 $0 $432 Associate Geologist - Short Staff Geologist - Thomason $51.00 10 $510 $0 $510 Technical Illustration $60.00 $0 $0 $0 Admin. Assistant $45.00 2 $90 $0 $90 Word Processing $55.00 $0 $0 $0 Support ... $35.00 2 $70 $0 $70 ' Subtotals [ 20] $1,326] $0[ $1,326[ $1,326 EXPENSES [ N°'°f I It I CJCC ~andling Charge Estimated REBILLABLES [Units I Rate I Amoun N/A I 7.5% { 15.0% Costs Vehicle (Hr) $10.00 ! $0 $0 $0 $0.300 $0 ::'==:. :'. '= :.'=' :=.:" $0 Mileagevehicle rental(Mi) $50.00 $0$u$0 $O1 . :=~i:::. ~:::i :.:::. ' $0 Airfare $0.00 $0 $0 .i~i:i::" .':' ::'i.::::ii:: :-:::..' :.' $0 Per Diem . $100 $0 $0 $0 ~.:'?::~:.::i:ii"i ~ $0 Phone/fax '=:i"="!i : i .. ~ ..: $15 $0 $1 ii:" :::'i-i.i: :':'.! $17 Shipping :~ii $25 $0 $2 :.i=I ' I': $27 '. 'i $25 $0 $2 ~':i. ".i. ' $27 MiscellaneOUSother "':~::..'" .(i::....' ~:ii.:::~.' :.: i:i::. $0 $0 $O:i~i '. ~::i~i:: i.:).-' $0 Subtotals $651 $0[ $5] . $01 $70 $70 Word Processing (Hr) $10 $0 $0 ?ili:. i; i;i~!i: .;.ii } i:i $0 Xerox(Copies) 25 $0.10 $3 $0 $3 Computer (Hr) ' $10 $0 $0' $0 CADD $10 $0 $0 $0 PPE (day) Sampling Trailer " $350 $15 $0 $0 $0 $0 iiiiiiii~:: $0 $0 $0 Mobile Phone $40 $0 $0 Bailers/DI Water [ $20 $0 $0 · $0 . Subtotals $3 1 $01 $0] $01 $3 $31 Other OUTSIDE SERVICES/SUBCONSULTANTS Driller $0 $0 $0' . 0 $0 $0 $0 0 Analytical Lab Testing $0 $0 $0 ~¢::. '. ~:i'~ii':i~:.:ii~~': 0.. Itl;., Geophysics $0 $0 $0 .:~. i :...:~:::.i~::ii::::i~ii:~:::.. 0 ! Construction Equipment $0 $0 $0 =.' : :.i?ii iii.:':: 0  Rental $0 $0 $0 .:' ::: ::::::-:'~i'i=:: ~' 0 !l[~ EquipmentReproduction $0 $0 $0 '~i::'.i ~ i ==============?=====' 0 ~'. Miscellaneous Supplies $50 $0 $4'~i :' i::':"" 53.75 ~ Landscape $0 $0 $0:~ ,i':.ii.' 0 ir,- Subtotals *50[ ,01 $41 $01 $541 $54 / TOTAL EXPENSES $127 ii TASK TOTAL [ $1,453 2: Drilling and Construction of Five Gas Monitoring Wells I.TOTALS ,BOR ~SONNEL CHARGES er- Fawcett Associate Geologist - Short .taft Geologist - Thomason ;chnical Illustration Rate $112.00 $108.00 $51.00 Hours 12 80 Amount $224 $35.00 $1,296 $4,080 $0 CJCC $0 $0 $0 Estimate $224 $1,296 $4,O8O $60.00 0 $0 nin. Assistant $45.00 2 $90 $0 $90 Word Processin_~ $55.00 0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotals $0 96 )oft ;ES REBILLABLES (Hr) ~er Diem one/fax Miscellaneous No. of Units Rate $10.00 $0.300 6 $50.00 6 $0.00 $100.00 : Subtotals Amount CJCC N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $300 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0 Handling Charge 7.5% $23 $0 $45 $25 $0 $2 $100 $0 $8 $100 $0 $8 $0 $0 $____~0 $1,125 ~ S0 ]- $84 5.0% Estimated Costs $0 $323 $0 $645 $27 $108 $108 $0 $1,209 PMENT Word Processing (Hr) ~,DD 50 $10 $0.10 $10 $10 $0 $5 $0 $0 6 $15 $90 0 $350 $0 6 $40 $240 Trailer obile Phone :GI $20 $120 - Subtotals $455 ;IDE SERVICES/SUBCONSULTANTS ler $15,975 $0 .er $0 $0 al Lab Testing $0 $0 $0 $5 $0 $0 $90 $0 $240 $120 $455 'sics ',onstruction Equipment Rental ~duction scellaneous Sup_plies Subtotals $0 $0 $0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,075 $0 $1,206] TOTAL EXPENSES $17,173 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108 $0 $455 $0[ $17,281 $17,281 TASK TOTAL $18 .,. Task 3: Initial Monitoring of All Gas Probes LABOR PERSONNEL CHARGES . I Rate I Hours I Amount I CJCC I Estimate TOTALS Project, Manager - Fawcett $112.00 1 $112 $0 $112 iAssociate Geologist - Short $108.00 1 $108 $0 $108 Staff Geologist - Thomason $51.00 10 $510 $0 $510 l~echnical Illustration $60.00 $0 $0 $0 Admin. Assistant $45.00 1 $45 $0 $45 Word Processing $55.00 $0 $0 $0 Support $35.00 $0 $0 $0 Subtotals [ 131 $7751 $01 $7751 $775 EXPENSES No. of ] ] [ CJCC ~andlingCharge tEstimated REBILLABLES Units Rate Amount N/A [ 7.5% I 15.0% Costs Vehicle (Hr) $10.00 $0 $0 :; ~: $0 Mileage (Mi) $0.300 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle (rental/day) I $50.00 $50 $0 $4 ~ :~ ~! $54 Airfare $0.00 $0 $0 $0"~ :: :~ i $0 Per Diem I $100 $100 $0 $8 ' $108 Phone/fax ,i:.~ii:.~ ~ .i .. i:.: $15 $0 $1".~ : iI $17 Shipping/Courier "i~:i ~':~:~:: : ~ ~. ~' : $100 $0 $8 .... :i'~' '~ . ~: $108 Miscellaneous :: ...... '~::~ i~i $100 $0 $8 ~:~i ,~ $108 Other 'i ~:: :: $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotals $3651 $0] $271 $0[ $393 $393 EQUIPMENT Word Processing (Hr) $10 $0 $0: ~ i~ ~ :i::~ ':.:::~':: $0 Xerox (Copies) 50 $0.10 $5 $0 $5 Computer(Hr) $10 $0 $0 :~ :' : i i:: $0 CADD $10 $0 $6'::.~ i: i ' $0 · PPE(day) 1 $15 $15 $0~ ~'i'!:i. : $15 Sampling Trailer $350 $0 $0 $0_ · VlobilePhone 1 $40 $40 $0 ~i,: ' : :~.::i.~:,~ ,. GasTech I $100 $100 $0 $100 f Subtotals $1601 $0l $01 $0[ $120 $120~ OUTSIDE SERVICES/SUBCONSULTANTS ~ 0 ~:Other $0 $0 '~Analytical Lab Testing $0 $0 _ Geophysics $0 $0 0 iConstruction Equipment $0 $0 0 ~ Equipment Rental $0 $0 $0 ~:: 0 Reproduction $0 $0 :ii::' :. i. 0 ~ 107.5 ~ Miscellaneous Supplies $100 $0 $8 ~ii' ::: ~ Landscape $0, $0, $0 .... ' : '. ::,::: : 0 Subtotals $1001 $0 [ $81 $0 1 $108 1 $108 TOTAL EXPENSES $621 i' TASK TOTAL ] $1,396 4 - Report Preparation ABOR 'ERSONNEL CHARGES ect Manager - Fawcett ,ssociate Geologist - Short Staff Geologist - Thomason :chnical Illustration Rate $112.00 $108.00 $51.00 $60.00 .n. Assistant $45.00 Word Processing $55.00 Subtotals $35.00 Hours Amount $224 $540 CJCC $0 Estimate $224 $540 30 $1,530 $0 $1,530 10 $600 $0 $600 2 $9O $0 $90 $275 $70 $0 $0 $3_329. 56 $275 $70 TOTALS EXPENSES LLABLES (Hr) (rental/day) Diem )ne/fax scellaneous Other No. of Units Rate $10.00 $0.300 $50.00 $0.00 100 Subtotals Amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15 $10 $75 $0 $100 CJCC N/A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ~UIPMENT Processing (Hr) (Copies) 2ADD 5 1000 25 5 $10 $50 $0 $0.10 $100 $0 $10 $250 $0 $10 $50 $0 $0 $15 Trailer $350 $0 $0 Mobile Phone $15 $0 $0 ers/DlWater ~ $20 $0 $0- $450 Subtotals $0 DUTSIDE SERVICES/SUBCONSULTANTS ller $0 :her $0 ical Lab Testing $0 $0 tsics ~'onstruction Equipment :nt Rental )roduction ;cellaneous Supplies }e Subtotals ~Iandling Charge 7.5O/o L 15.0% $0 $0 $0 $1 $1 $6 $0 $8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8 $0 $8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $oi- TOTALEXPENSES TASK TOTAL Estimated Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17 $11 $81 $0 $108 _ $50 $100 $250 $50 $0 $0 $108 $__0_o $450 $450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108 $0 $0 $108t $108 $665 UKIAH OFFICE NORTH BUSH gTREET ~. c~ 95482 (?0D463-44~ FAX FORT BRAGG OFFICE ! 2o HI~T FIR 5TIBET COUNTY OF MENDOCINO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STIPULATED ORDER OF COMPLIANCE AND AGREEMENT UKIAH SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE #23-AA-0019 TO: June 18, 1996 FRED SCHNEITER MAYOR CITY OF UKIAH 300 SEMINARY AVENUE UKIAH, CA 95482-5400 CANDACE HORSLEY UKIAH CITY MANAGER 300 SEMINARY AVENUE UKIAH, CA 95482-5400 FROM: JOHN D. ROGERS, DIRECTOR MENDOCINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 880 N. BUSH ST. UKIAH, CA 95482 RE: CITY OF UKIAH SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE 23-AA-0019 SE 1/4 SECTION 10, T15N, R12W, MDB&M Located the end of VICHY SPRINGS RD UKIAH, CA 95482 A) STATE MINIMUM STANDARDS VIOLATION 1. 14CCR Section 17258.23 Explosive Gases Control The City of Ukiah has installed five gas monitoring wells along the southern and western landfill property boundary beginning in July 1994 with construction complete by September 1994. Quarterly monitoring of the gas wells has revealed combustible gas levels above the lower explosive limit in gas monitoring wells number 3 and 4 verified in monitoring conducted on January 25, 1996. B) SPECIFIC ACTION Pursuant to 14 CCR Section 17258.23 the City of Ukiah developed a remediation plan submitted to the Local Enforcement Agency on March 7, 1996 and forwarded to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. On May 9, 1996, the City of Ukiah submitted a schedule for completing the perimeter gas monitoring network and implementing a gas migration corrective action. C) CONDITIONS: The City of Ukiah will meet the following conditions: 1. Revise the November 1994 Gas Migration and Corrective Action Plan. The contract is to be awarded by July 17~ 199~. The revised plan is to be submitted to the LEA by September 13~ 1996. 2. Develop design for gas migration corrective action measure and PS&E preparation. The contract is to be awarded by March 5~ 1997. The design and PS&E are to be completed by May 9~ 1997. 3. Implement corrective action for gas migration. The contract is to be awarded by July 2~ 1997. Construction of corrective action measures is to be completed by October 31~ 1997. 4. Construct the five remaining gas monitoring wells that will serve as points of compliance along the north and eastern perimeter of waste footprint. The public bid process is to be completed by July 19~ 199~. The contract is to be awarded by August 7~ 1996. Construction of the wells is to be completed by October 15~ 1996. Failure to comply with the conditions and deadlines contained in this Stipulated Order of Compliance and Agreement and/or failure to take prompt corrective action when required by the LEA may lead to civil penalties pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 45200. Page 2 of 5 Compliance Date Chart 23- AA-0019 CITY OF UKIAH-June 18, 1996 Action/Condition Award Contract For Revised Gas Migration Corrective Action Plan Submit Revised Gas Migration and Corrective Action Plan Award Contract For Design of Gas Migration Corrective Action Measure and PS&E Preparation Complete Design for Gas Migration Corrective Action Measure And PS&E Award Contract For Construction of Gas Migration Corrective Action Measure Complete Construction of Corrective Action Measure Complete Public Bid Process For Construction of Gas Monitoring Wells Award Contract For Construction of Gas Monitoring Wells Complete Construction of Gas Monitorinl] Wells Duo 7/17196 9/13/96 3/5/97 519/97 7/2/97 10/31/97 7/19/96 8/7/96 10/15/96 Submitted Acc~_pted Page 3 of 5 The parties agree that as long as Owner/Operator complies with the interim operating conditions set forth herein, the Mendocino County Division of Environmental Health shall take no other or further enforcement action against the Owner/Operator or its officers, agents, or employees with respect to the violations described in this Stipulated Agreement. OWNER/OPERATOR: city of Ukiah Fred Schneiter Mayor of Ukiah Date: ~01 /~~ Candace Horsley ~ Ukiah city Manager Date: L "'" '~~! LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY: MENDOCINO COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH John D. Rogers, Director Division of Environmental Health Local Enforcement Agency Date: ITEM NO. 6j MEETING DATE: August 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION TO COUNCIL REGARDING PURCHASE OF LIQUID ALUMINUM CHLORHYDRO×IDE Liquid aluminum chlorhydroxide is a coagulant used to aid the filtering of the water at the water treatment plant. This product has proven to provide the most efficient and cost effective filter process. Requests for Quotations through the informal bid process were sent to three suppliers. The bids were opened by the Purchasing Department on July 24, 1996. Two bids were returned and evaluated by staff. The Iow bidder is NTU Technologies with a total bid of $6,51 5.44. A purchase order has been issued to NTU Technologies. Based on our purchasing policies, we are giving the City Council the required notification of this action. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive report regarding the purchase of liquid aluminum chlorhydroxide. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A Acct. No. (if not budgeted): Acct. No.: 820-3908-520 Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Prepared by: George Borecky, Water/Sewer Operations Superintendent Coordinated with' Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Bid Tabulation APPROVED. [ c-andace ~orsl~y, Ci~-y IV~anager Z Z C C -- -r ..q '< 0 × rtl Item No. 6k Date: Auoust 7. 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Execute Service Schedule No. One to the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement relating to the Identified Power Sale to Shelter Cove Resort Improvement District No. One. REPORT: The purpose of this Service Schedule is to make available Wholesale Electric Power by the Participants for delivery by NCPA to the Shelter Cove Resort. Each Participant will make available to NCPA, Wholesale Electric Power Service to enable NCPA, after transmission losses, to provide Shelter Cove with Wholesale Electric Power. This Agreement will allow the City of Ukiah to sell available Electric Power currently not utilized. This will reduce our stranded investment and our purchased power cost by reducing our fixed costs on the generation. The City of Ukiah's share of any savings through this agreement is 6.025%. Therefore, staff recommends the approval of this Agreement. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to Execute Service Schedule No. One to the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement relating to the Identified Power Sale to Shelter Cove Resort Improvement District No. One. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Reject Authorization and Request Non- Participation. Acct. No. (If not budgeted): Appropriation Request: Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Darryl L Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Prepared by: Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachment: 1) Service Schedule No. One Acct. No. (if budgeted) Can-dac~ Horsier,, City Manager NCPA A Public Agency Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way, Roseville California 95678 MICHAEL W. McDONALD General Manager (916)781-4223 July 16, 1996 TO: Utility Directors Subject: Service Schedule No. One to the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement Enclosed is the final executable version of Service Schedule No. One to the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement relating to Identified Power Sale to Shelter Cove Resort Improvement District No. 1. Please arrange to have the Service Schedule executed in counterpart by August 12, 1996, which is 45 days from Commission approval on June 27, 1996 of the Shelter Cove Power Sale. This is the time frame specified in Section 8.2 of the Marketing Agreement for participant approval for Identified Power Sales with terms of one year to three years. Following execution please return the nine duplicate originals of the executed signature page to Ms. Desiree Rioux. A complete set of conformed signature pages will be returned for your files. Sincerely, THOMAS C. GREEN Power Contracts Enclosure cc w/encl: Desiree Rioux cc w/o encl: Jim Beck Utility Directors July 16, 1996 Page 2 bcc w/o encl: Don Dame SERVICE SCHEDULE No. ONE to MEMBER RESOURCE MARKETING PROJECT AGREEMENT relating to the IDENTIFIED POWER SALE to SHELTER COVE RESORT IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT No. 1 This Service Schedule dated ,1996, is an agreement by and among the Northern California Power Agency, a joint powers agency of the State of California (NCPA) and the members of NCPA having executed this Service Schedule (Participant or Participants), and is entered into on the basis of the following. Recitals: A. NCPA's resource plan shows that it would be economical for NCPA and its participating members to sell Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service to the Shelter Cove Resort Improvement District No. 1 (District). B. NCPA has therefore entered into the Power Sale Agreement between the District and NCPA, dated ,1996 under which it will sell Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service to the District conditioned upon necessary interconnection arrangements between the District and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and the necessary firm transmission service being provided by PG&E to NCPA in accordance with the NCPA-PG&E Interconnection Agreement. C. District is a resort improvement district formed under the provisions of Sections 13000 et. seq., of the Public Resources Code of the State of California, acting by and through its Board of Directors to provide, among other services, retail electric service to its customers. D. NCPA and the Participants wish to enter into this Service Schedule to provide all means necessary for NCPA to fulfill obligations incurred on behalf of NCPA and the Participants pursuant to the Power Sale Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, NCPA and the Participants hereby enter into this Service Schedule. Definitions. The following terms shall, when used in this Service Schedule, have the following meanings: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart t 1.1 "Control Area Services" means those transmission and ancillary services provided by PG&E in accordance with the NCPA-PG&E Interconnection Agreement executed November 26, 1991, as amended, (IA) to NCPA and NCPA Member Customers, as that term is defined in the IA, that facilitate the delivery of power from NCPA to the District. 1.2 "District Load" means the total electric capacity and energy requirements of all District's native retail electric customers (expressed in kW and kWh) during a month. 1.3 "Participant" means an NCPA member which has executed this Service Schedule and a Participant's successor in interest. 1.4 "Participation Percentage" means, with respect to each Participant, the percentage of the Project for which such Participant is obligated pursuant to the terms of this Service Schedule. The Participation Percentage for each Participant shall be the percentage set forth opposite the name of such Participant in Appendix A hereto, as such Appendix A may be amended from time to time in accordance with this Service Schedule. 1.5 "Project" means the sale of Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service pursuant to the Power Sale Agreement and any amendments thereto. 1.6 "Power Sale Agreement" means the agreement between NCPA and the District referred to in the second recital of this Service Schedule. 1.7 "Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service" means the provision of firm capacity, associated energy, firm transmission and Control Area Services necessary to serve District Load. Purpose. The purpose of this Service Schedule is (i) to make available Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service by Participants for delivery by NCPA to District under the Power Sale Agreement, (ii) to authorize NCPA as agent for the Participants to engage in activities related to that basic purpose and (iii) to specify the rights and obligations of NCPA and of the Participants with respect to the Project. Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service. Each Participant will make available to NCPA Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service to enable NCPA, after transmission losses, to provide District, at the Point of Delivery specified in the Power Sale Agreement, with Wholesale Electric Power Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart Requirements Service in amounts equal to the product of the Participation Percentage of that Participant and the total Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service to be provided by NCPA to District under the Power Sale Agreement. To the extent any Participant fails to make available Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service to NCPA for purposes of fulfilling NCPA's obligation to District under the Power Sale Agreement, NCPA shall procure the necessary Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service and bill such Participant to recover all costs attributable to such procurement. Related NCPA Activities. NCPA may engage in other necessary and related activities intended to enable the Participants to make available the Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service provided by NCPA to District as efficiently and economically as possible. NCPA shall exercise the authority granted to it by this section in accordance with the provisions of section 11 of this Service Schedule. NCPA Project Revenues. NCPA shall credit to each Participant in accordance with section 7 an amount equal to total Project revenues net of Project expenses times each Participant's corresponding Participation Percentage. NCPA Project Expenses. The Participants recognize that NCPA will incur certain expenses, including but not limited to charges for transmission services, as the result of administering this Service Schedule and the Power Sale Agreement, and carrying out any related activities in which it may be directed to engage pursuant to Section 4 of this Service Schedule. The Participants agree that NCPA may budget and bill for such expenses pursuant to Section 6 of this Service Schedule. Budget and Monthly Statements. 7.1 Prior to the beginning of each NCPA fiscal year for which no budget has been adopted, the NCPA Commission will adopt a budget for such fiscal year or years for revenues, costs and expenses relating to the Project. The NCPA Commission may adopt budgets for more than one fiscal year. The budget shall include the following categories of revenues, costs and expenses: (a) the revenues that NCPA estimates that it will receive from the District for providing Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service to District, (b) the charges that NCPA estimates that it will incur to provide Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service to District, and (c) all other costs and expenses reasonably related to the Project. NCPA shall promptly give notice to each Participant of its projected share of such categories of revenues, costs and expenses. Shelter Cove Power Sale PartiCipation 'Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart 7.2 Monthly statements prepared by NCPA shall be sent to each Participant showing the Participant's share of revenues, costs and expenses payable pursuant to this Service Schedule for each billing period. Such statements shall separately set forth any credit or debit adjustments. 7.3 Revenues from the Project payable by NCPA to Participants pursuant to section 5 shall be credited monthly to Participants in an amount as recorded in the accompanying monthly statement. 7.4 Amounts owed by Participants as shown on each monthly statement are due and payable thirty (30) days after the date of the monthly statement except that any amount due on a Friday, holiday or weekend may be paid on the closest following workday. 7.5 Any amounts due and not paid by a Participant or NCPA shall bear interest from the due date until paid at the annual rate established by the Commission of NCPA at the time of adoption of the then most recent budget. If a Participant questions or disputes the correctness of any monthly statement by NCPA, it shall pay NCPA, in cases where an amount is owed, the amount claimed when due and shall within thirty (30) days of the receipt of such monthly statement request an explanation from NCPA. If the monthly statement is determined to be incorrect, NCPA will issue a corrected monthly statement and refund any amount which may be due the Participant, which refund shall bear interest from the date NCPA made or received original payment, as the case may be, until the date of the refund at an annual rate to be established by the Commission of NCPA at the time of adoption of the then most recent annual budget. IfNCPA and the Participant fail to agree on the correctness of a monthly statement within thirty (30) days after the Participant has requested an explanation, the parties shall promptly submit the dispute to arbitration under section 1280 et seq. of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Obligations in the Event of Default. 8.1 Upon failure of any Participant to make any payment in full when due under this Service Schedule, NCPA shall make written demand upon such Participant, and if payment is not made within 30 days from the date of such demand, the failure to make payment shall constitute a default. 8.2 Upon the default of any Participant, NCPA (a) may terminate the provisions of this Service Schedule insofar as the ServiCe Schedule entitles the defaulting Participant to its Participation Percentage of Project benefits, and (b) shall use its best efforts to sell and transfer for the Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart Participant's account all or a portion of the Participant's Participation Percentage of the Project. When making such sales and transfers, NCPA shall allow all Participants and then other NCPA member entities the same rights of first refusal that are provided for in section 9 of this Service Schedule. Notwithstanding such sale, transfer or termination, the obligations of the defaulting Participant under this Service Schedule shall continue in full force and effect except that such obligations shall be discharged to the extent that NCPA receives payment from a purchaser or transferee of the defaulting Participant's Participation Percentage in the Project. 8.3 Upon the default of any Participant, and except as transfers are made pursuant to section 9, (i) the Participation Percentage of each nondefaulting Participant shall be automatically increased for the remaining term of this Service Schedule pro rata with those of the other nondefaulting Participants, and (ii) the defaulting Participant's Participation Percentage in the benefits of the Project shall (but only for purposes of computing the respective Participation Percentages of the nondefaulting Participants) be reduced correspondingly The fact that other Participants have increased their obligations to NCPA according to this section shall not relieve the defaulting Participant of its liability under this Service Schedule, and any Participant increasing its obligation shall have a right of recovery from the defaulting Participant to the extent of its increase in obligation. Transfers of Rights by Participants. 9.1 A Participant has the right to make transfers, sales, and assignments (collectively "transfer(s)") of the Project and fights thereto. If a Participant desires to transfer a portion or its entire share of the Project for a specific time interval, or permanently, NCPA will, if requested by such Participant, use its best efforts to transfer that portion of the Participant's share of the Project. 9.2 Before NCPA may transfer a Project share pursuant to section 9.1 to any person or entity other than a Participant, it shall give all Participants the right to purchase the share on the same terms and conditions. Before NCPA may transfer a Project share pursuant to section 9.1 to any person or entity other than an NCPA member, it shall give all NCPA members the right to purchase the share on the same terms and conditions. Such right shall be exercised within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice of said right. Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart 10 11 12 13 9.3 No transfer shall relieve a Participant of any of its obligations under this Service Schedule except to the extent that NCPA receives payment of these obligations from a transferee. Withdrawal by Participants. No Participant may withdraw from this Service Schedule. However, NCPA will use its best efforts to assist any Participant that wishes to transfer all or any portion of its rights pursuant to section 9 above. NCPA Commission Governance of the Project. 11.1 Commission Meetings. Actions of the NCPA Commission relating to this Service Schedule or to the Project shall be taken in accordance with section 12.2 of the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement. 11.2 Quorum. A quorum at NCPA Commission meetings for purposes of acting upon matters relating to this Service Schedule or to the Project shall be established in accordance with section 11.2 of the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement. 11.3 Voting. Voting by representatives of Participants on matters relating to this Service Schedule or to the Project shall be in accordance with section 12.2 of the Member Resource Marketing Project Agreement. Term and Termination. This Service Schedule shall not take effect until it has been executed and delivered to NCPA by Participants, whose Participation Percentages, in the aggregate relative to all Participants' entitlements, shall equal at least 65 percent. The NCPA members listed on Appendix A shall have 45 days following written notice of the effective date to execute and deliver counterparts of this Service Schedule to NCPA. If any NCPA member listed on Appendix A fails to execute and deliver this Service Schedule within such 45 days, unless otherwise provided by the Participants, the Participating Percentages of such member or members shall be spread among the Participants in proportion to their Participation Percentages. The term of this Service Schedule shall continue until the expiration of the Power Sale Agreement. This Service Schedule shall not be subject to termination prior to the expiration of its term by any party under any circumstances, whether based upon the default of any other party under this Service Schedule or otherwise, except as specifically provided herein. Member l~esource Marketing Agreement. This Service Schedule shall be deemed incorporated into the Member Resource Marketing Agreement that each Participant has executed or successor agreement to the Member Resource Marketing Agreement. This Service Schedule shall be construed as constituting Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 the more specific terms governing the general relationship between the parties set out in that Member Resource Marketing Agreement. Several Obligation. No Participant shall be liable under this Service Schedule for the obligations of any other Participant, except as provided in section 8 of this Service Schedule. Each Participant shall be solely responsible and liable for performance of its obligations under this Service Schedule and for the maintenance and operation of its respective properties. The obligation of each Participant to make payments and to make available Wholesale Electric Power Requirements Service under this Service Schedule is a several obligation and not a joint obligation with those of the other Participants, except as provided in section 8 of this Service Schedule. Amendments. This Service Schedule may be amended only by a written instrument executed by NCPA and the Participants or their successors with the same formality as this Service Schedule. Severability. In the event that any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Service Schedule shall be held invalid, NCPA and the Participants intend that all other terms, covenants and conditions and their application shall not be affected thereby, but shall remain in force and effect unless a court holds that such provisions are not severable from all other provisions of this Service Schedule. Governing Law. This Service Schedule shall be interpreted, governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Califomia. Counterparts. This Service Schedule may be executed in several counterparts, all or any of which shall be regarded for all purposes as one original and shall constitute and be but one and the same instrument. Headings. The headings to the sections in this Service Schedule are intended for convenience only and not for the purpose of interpreting the provisions of this Service Schedule. Notices. Any notice, demand or request required or authorized by this Service Schedule to be given to any Participant or to NCPA shall be given in writing and shall either be personally delivered to the Participant or transmitted to the Participant by regular mail at the address designated by the Participant. The designation of such address may be changed at any time by written notice. No Waivers. No waiver of performance under this Service Schedule shall be effective unless given by the Commission. Any such waiver by the Commission Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart in any particular instance shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any subsequent performance. 22 Warranty. of Authority_. Each Participant which has executed and delivered this Service Schedule represents and warrants that it has agreed to be bound by all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Service Schedule and has acted with all of the requisite capacity and authority and the approval of its governing body. In witness whereof, each Participant has, by the signature of its duly autt~rized representatives shown below, executed and delivered a counterpart of this Service Schedule. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY CITY OF ALAMEDA By: Attest: Date: By: Date: CITY OF BIGGS CITY OF GRIDLEY Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart I , CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HE~DSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA R~ ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By' By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart CITY OF HEALDSBURG CITY OF LODI Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF LOMPOC PLUMAS-SIERRA RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF UKIAH Attest: Attest: By: By: Date: Date: Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart ! APPENDIX A SERVICE SCHEDULE No. ONE SHELTER COVE POWER SALE AGREEMENT PARTICIPANT PARTICIPATION PERCENTAGES Alameda 21.486 Biggs 0.572 Gridley 1.878 Healdsburg 3.509 Lodi 22.670 Lompoc 5.668 Plumas-Sierra 4.480 Roseville 33.712 Ukiah 6.025 TOTAL 100.000 A-1 Shelter Cove Power Sale Participation Service Schedule No. 1, Execution Counterpart ITEM NO. 61 DATE: Auqust 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF POLICY RESOLUTION AMENDING POLICY RESOLUTION NO. 25 DECLARING POLICY REGARDING REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES FOR ELECTED AND/OR APPOINTED CITY OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES The Policy Resolution for reimbursement of expenses for City officials and employees was adopted by the Council in January 1991. One of the items under this policy was a daily per diem of $45 to cover expenses for meals, tips, and other related miscellaneous expenses. At this time staff would like to amend the policy on per diem expenses to cover half-day expenses when an employee or official is attending a meeting or conference that is in close proximity to the City of Ukiah and, therefore, a full day is not spent to attend the meeting. The following breakdown of meal expenses is recommended: $10 for breakfast, $15 for lunch, and $20 for dinner. This amendment should alleviate the situations of unnecessary additional expense for half-day conferences. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council adopt Policy Resolution Amending Policy Resolution No. 25 Declaring Policy Regarding Reimbursement of Expenses for Elected and/or Appointed City Officials, Officers, and Employees ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Determine modifications to Policy Resolution No. 25 are not necessary at this time. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Prepared by: Candace Horsley, City Manager Coordinated with: Gordon Elton, Finance Director Attachments: 1. Policy Resolution No. 25 2. Proposed Policy Resolution Amendment APPROVE~, ,WI Candace Horsley, Cit~ 4/CAN:ASR25 " Manager 1 § ? 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 19 90 91 27 POLICY RESOLUTION NO. 25 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH DECLARING POLICY REGARDING REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES FOR ELECTED AND/OR APPOINTED CITY OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine policy regarding reimbursement of elected and/or appointed City officials, officers and employees for expenses incurred that are directly related to conducting their respective City duties and responsibilities; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this policy to establish and define consistent practices to expense reimbursement throughout our municipal organization; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ukiah, State of California, that those allowable expenses for which elected and/or appointed City officials, officers and employees shall be reimbursed by the City of Ukiah shall include the following: · Elected and/or appointed City officials, officers, and employees shall attempt to use City vehicles whenever conducting City business locally, or when travelling to meetings, training seminars and conferences outside of the County of Mendocino. In the event City vehicles are unavailable, and private vehicles are utilized, mileage shall be reimbursed at the rate of twenty-five cents (25¢) per mile. 2. The City shall normally only reimburse the cost of a single room incurred during attendance at regional or state-wide meetings, training seminars,, and conferences outside of the City. City Council spouses shall be covered under this lodging provision as a reimbursable expense. . The City shall reimburse for the lowest cost scheduled air fare feasible for air travel expenses incurred to conferences outside of the North Coast Region. If any 'City official decides to stay beyond the term of the conference or seminar, their expenses for that period shall not be covered by the City. 4. A daily per diem of $45.00 shall be issued to cover expenses for meals, tips and other related miscellaneous expenses. , Parking rental fees shall be considered an allowable reimbursable expense beyond the daily per diem. 6. City Councilmembers and appointed officials shall be reimbursed 1 6 ? 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 21 for the cost of attendance at local community events directly related to their role as elected or appointed City officials. 7. The City shall cover the cost of specialized publication subscriptions directly related to the duties and responsibilities of elected or appointed City officials. . The City shall reimburse travelling, tuition and book expenses incurred by employees for college or special courses directly related to their present career with the City. City approval must precede actual class or course registration. 9. Non-reimbursable expenses shall include but not be limited to the following: a. Any and all associated expenses incurred in attending partisan political functions, meetings or conferences. b. Any and all associated expenses incurred in attending functions, meetings or conferences sponsored by Political Action Groups (PACS). c. Any and all associated expenses incurred in attending religious functions, events, meetings, or conferences. d. Spousal expenses incurred for travel and meals. e. Expenses incurred by City Councilmembers or City appointed officials for local community events or functions they would have ordinarily attended as private citizens irrespective of their official role. f. Training, tuition and book expenses incurred by employees for college or special course unrelated to their present career with the City. 10. The City Manager shall be authorized to review and approve any and all requests for expense reimbursement. Furthermore, the City Council delegates to the City Manager the necessary authority to determine whether expense requests not anticipated or delineated in this Policy Resolution are reimbursable by the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 1991, by the following role call vote: AYES: Councilmembers McMichael, Wattenburger, Shoemaker, Schneiter, and Mayor Henderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. l:lb . £ES2/PO~ICY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 POLICY RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH DECLARING POLICY REGARDING REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES FOR ELECTED AND/OR APPOINTED CITY OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEE~ WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine policy regarding reimbursement of elected and/or appointed City officials, officers, and employees for expenses incurred that are directly related to conducting their respective City duties and responsibilities; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this policy to establish and define consistent practices to expense reimbursement throughout our municipal organization; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ukiah, State of California, that those allowable expenses for which elected and/or appointed City officials, officers, and employees shall be reimbursed by the City of Ukiah shall include the following: 1. Elected and/or appointed City officials, officers, and employees shall attempt to use City vehicles whenever conducting City business locally, or when travelling to meetings, training seminars, and conferences outside of the County of Mendocino. In the event City vehicles are unavailable, and private vehicles are utilized, mileage shall be reimbursed at the rate of twenty-five cents (25¢) per mile. 2. The City shall normally only reimburse the cost of a single room incurred during attendance at regional or state-wide meetings, training seminars, and conferences outside of the City. City Council spouses shall be covered under this lodging provision as a reimbursable expense. The City shall reimburse for the lowest cost scheduled air fare feasible for air travel expenses incurred to conferences outside of the North Coast Region. If any City official decides to stay beyond the term of the conference or seminar, their expenses for that period shall not be covered by the City. A daily per diem of $45.00 shall be issued to cover expenses for meals, tips and other related miscellaneous expenses. For less than full day attendance, the reimbursement for meal expenses will be $10 for breakfast, $15 for lunch, and $20 for dinner. . . . Parking rental fees shall be considered an allowable reimbursable expense beyond the daily per diem. . City Councilmembers and appointed officials shall be reimbursed for the cost of attendance at local community events directly related to their role as elected or appointed City officials. . 8, The City shall cover the cost of specialized publication subscriptions directly related to the duties and responsibilities of elected or appointed City officials. The City shall reimburse travelling, tuition, and book expense incurred by employees for college or special courses directly related to their present career with the City. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 . 10. Non-reimbursable expenses shall include but not be limited to the following: a. Any and all associated expenses incurred in attending partisan political functions, meetings, or conferences. b. Any and all associated expenses incurred in attending functions, meetings, or conferences sponsored by Political Action Groups (PACS). c. Any and all associated expenses incurred in attending religious functions, events, meetings, or conferences. d. Spousal expenses incurred by City Councilmembers or City appointed officials for local community events or functions they would have ordinarily attended as private citizens irrespective of their official role. e. Expenses incurred by City Councilmembers or City appointed officials for local community events or functions they would have ordinarily attended as private citizens irrespective of their official role. f. Training, tuition, and book expenses incurred by employees for college or special course unrelated to their present career with the City. The City Manager shall be authorized to review and approve any and all requests for expense reimbursement. Furthermore, the City Council delegates to the City Manager the necessary authority to determine whether expense requests not anticipated or delineated in this Policy Resolution are reimbursable by the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of August, 1996, by the following role call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Fred Schneiter, Mayor Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk 4:RES/Perdiem.Pol ITEM NO. Om DATE: August 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Approve Legal Publishing Services as Submitted by Ukiah Daily Journal for Fiscal Year 1996/97, in the Amount of $3.70 per Column Inch for First Day and $2.35 per Column Inch for Additional Days. As the Ukiah Daily Journal is the only newspaper which qualifies for the designation as a newspaper having general circulation in Ukiah, a formal process requesting bids for legal publishing services was not used. The City Clerk requested the Ukiah Daily Journal submit a letter which formalized the extension of the 1995/96 fiscal year contract. The attached letter was received on July 29, 1996. There is no change in price from the previous contract amounts. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve legal publishing services as submitted by Ukiah Daily Journal for fiscal year 1996/97, in the amount of $3.70 per column inch for first day and $2.35 per column inch for additional days. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS' N/A Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Prepared by: Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: Legal Rate Contract Letter Acct. No. (if budgeted) 100-1101-232 $8,000 Candace o sley, City~anager c:mg/asrleg.pub 590 South School Street · Post Office Box 749 · Ukiah, California 95482-0749 July 29, 1996 Marge Giuntoli City Clerk City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 Re: Legal rate contract Dear Ms. Giuntoli, As per your request today by phone, following is the information previously required to determine the contractor for legal notices placed by the City of Ukiah: 1) Total paid circulation (ABC Audit 9/30/94*): 8,440 Daily; 8,467 Sunday 2) Paid circulation within the 95482 Zip code: 5,113 Daily; 5,041 Sunday 3) Days of Publication: Monday through Friday, PM; Sunday AM 4) Type and size print and format size used for legal publication: 8 pt. Helvetica, 8 pica wide column, 6 point gutter between columns 5) Cost of publication per column inch: a. First day - $3.70 per column inch b. Additional days - $2.35 per column inch 6) A 5% discount will be given for providing camera-ready material by deadline day and time. 7) Print size and format for camera-ready material same as in item//4. 8) Errors and omissions: The Journal will only be responsible for the cost of the space contain- ing the error, provided the notice was not provided camera-ready, and will run a correction at no charge in the next available issue after being notified of the error. Please note that the rates listed in item//5 reflect no increase since June of 1992. We appreci- ate the opportunity to continue to serve the legal publication needs of the City of Ukiah. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 468-3510. Sincerely, John R. Speck Advertising Director * An audit will be performed this fall by the Audit Bureau of Circulations, with a 9/30/96 effective date. Current figures will be available after the audit is completed. Locally operated member [~ Donrey Media Group ITEM NO. 6n MEETING DATE AUGUST 7. 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL EXCESS PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE IV, RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1972 The Ukiah Fire Department has an opportunity to secure excess firefighting apparatus and equipment from the Federal Government at no cost. This excess apparatus and equipment is in very serviceable condition, is newer than some of the fire department's existing equipment, and would improve it's ability to deliver service, especially in the West hills. Adoption of this resolution will complete the paperwork required to take possession of selected federal excess apparatus and equipment. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the resolution. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Decline to adopt the resolution. Acct. No.: N/A (if NOT budgeted) Appropriation Requested: Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Acct. No.: N/A Fred W. Keplinger, Director of Public Safety Roe M. Sandelin, Fire Operations Commander Candace Horsley, City Manager Proposed Resolution Agreement for Federal Excess Property Property Agreement for Mutual Fire Protection Aid APPROVED BY Can'6~d~ce Horsley, Ci~ Manager 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97 ..... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL EXCESS PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE IV, RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT 1972 (PL 92-419) (FOR INCORPORATED FIRE AGENCIES) WHEREAS, there is a need for Federal Excess Property to help fight wildland, rural, structure or other fires in the County of Mendocino; and WHEREAS, Fred W. Keplinger is the Director of Public Safety of the Ukiah Fire Department; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Ukiah accepts the agreement between the State of California, Department of Forestry, and the Ukiah Fire Department, for the loan of Federal Excess Property, and authorizes the Director of Public Safety, Fred W. Keplinger, to sign agreement for the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of August, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST' Fred Schneiter, Mayor Marge Giuntoli, Deputy City Clerk 4: Res: FAre .. STATE OF CALIFORNIA The Resources Agency Department of Forestry & Fire ProtecTion Agreement ~or Federal Excess P=oUe=tV · Agreement ~or Acquisition, Accountability, Use and disposal o~ FEDERAL EXCESS PROPERTY Under the Rural Community Fire ProTection Program o~ the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act (CFAA) of 1978. BeTween The State of California and Ukiah Fire Department THIS AGREEMENT FOR FEDEHAL EXCESS PROPERTY, made and entered into California acting by and through the Director of the Department of Forestry, hereinafter called the "State", and Ukiah Fire Departmentt hereinafter called the "Local Agency", covenants as ~ollows: A. WHEREA~, the State has been approved as an agent of the U.S. Yores~ Service for ~he purpose of administering the Cooperative Forestz-y Assistance Act of 1978 (PL 9~-~12) Rural Community Fir~ ProTection Program hereinafter re,er=ed to as CFAA, and ~. WHE~S, the CFAA has made Federal Excess Property available fo= use by the Local Agency in developing 'and maintaining equipment and used or useful in upgrading the fire pro,eot!on capability of the Local Agency, and C.. WHEREAS, the Local Agency desires to participate in said CFAA. NOW, THEREFORE, it is muL-aally agreed ~hat, eSfec~ive as the date shown above: 1. The $~ate will loan ~o ~he Local Agency Federal Excess Pruper~y described under =he following terms and cond£=lons: (a) A/1 such Federal Excess Proper~ loaned will be for an lnc~in~e period of (b) The purpose of ~is loan or assignment is =o provide ?ederal Excess Property =o =he Local Agency for ~e primaz~ purpose oS upgrad/ng the flreflgh=lng capablil~ of ~he Local Agency. Use =us~ be restricted ~o ~hls purpose. (c) Ownership shall remain in the Federal Government. The Local Agent! may modify, improve, build-up or repair proper~y acqn~=ed. The Local Agency will mar~ and continuously ma£n=ain such mar~s, signs, decals or emblems on the property Federal ~over~e-=. For any veh~cle/s which requires or is/are =c be licensed, the $~a=e w~ll deliver to The Local Agen=! documentation suitable for r~gtstra=ion. (d) The State and the Local Agency will maintain formal accoun=a~ility records for all Federal Excess Pr~.uerty loaned To ~he Local Agency. Such proper=y will be made available a~ all ~tmes for a physical inven=ory which may be made ~y Federal ~/or S~a=e pe=so~el. (e) The Local A~ency s~iI be responsible for ~he proper care, security, maln~e~ce and u=lliza=ion of ~hls proper=y ~o ass~e irs continued ~e as con=empla=ed herein un=il such =lee as ~he S~a=e issues a formal release from such respo~ibili~y. (f) When any 9roper~y lo~ed or assl~ed ~o ~he Local Agency herein~er is los~, worn ou~, no longer serviceable or ~' longer needed. ~e local Caiifornia Peps=men= of Porms~ry Mendocino Ranger Unit, 17501 N. Highway 101, Willits, CA 95490 shall ~e con=ac~ for ~ro~er=y doc~en=a=lon ~d handling. 2. In =he even= ~hat ail of or ~y one or more pieces of equi~menu ~rovided ~o ~he local agency hereunder is assi~ed, lost, s~olen, worn ou~, destroyed, damaged or otherwise rend~rmd useless or ~available for i~s purposes in=ended her~der and i= is clearly established ~hat such assi~men~ or loss occurred w~ile or as a resul~ of a ~e o~her ~han ~ha~ s~ated in (b) a~ove, then ~he S~a=e shall have the righ~ and the obligation ~o rs~ake such e~ipment and/or ~sess ~he Local Agency ~cr damages uD to the ~lum. established by ~hm Sta~e for each such ~iece o~ equl~men=, Immedla=ely 9riot ~o such assignment. loss, damage or destruction. 3. In the event of any dispute over any equipment loaned to The Local Agency hereunder or. any o~ the terms or conditions cont~ined herein, the'disput~-will be decided by the $~ate and its decision shall be binding and final. 4. The parties hereto agree that the Local Agency, their o~ficers, employees, agents, servants, ¢~n~ractors, volunteers, paid call firemen and others ac~ing on behal~ of ~he Local Agency performing under the ~erms of ~his Agreement, are not ac~ing as of Picers or employees or agents of the S~a~e or of the Federal Government. §. The Local Agency agrees to defend, indemnify, save and hold · harmless the Stare as defined h~re~n, and ~he De~ar~men~ of · Forestry,' their of Picers, agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, causes of ac=lono or l£abili~y of any kind whatsoever arising our of ~he acts of the Local Agent, its agents or employees in the performance of any function provided for under the ~erms of this Agreement. 6. The period of ~hls Agreemen~ is for a period of one year from the date shown a~ove. The agreement will be reviewed annually by ~he Administra~ive Officer or Schedule A Coordinator and automatically extended if no changes (e.g. signature authority} or violations have occurred. Agreements may be terminated by either ~arty after giving notice 180 days. in advance of such termination to the other party. During the term stated in (6), above: this Agreement. a~ ~e oD=ion of the $~ate, may be terminated by the State 9or any · ma=trial breach by r. ocal Agency of any of the terms herein. 8. The mailing address of the parties here=o, for all notices. payments, repayments or any o~her activity required or contemplated under the terms o~ this Agreement except eventual disDositlon of proper~y as provided in No. 1 (f) above, are: ~ocal Agency: City of Ukiah Fire Department Phone: (707) 463-6274 Address: 300 Seminary Avenue~ Ukiah~ CA 95482 S~ate: Sta~e of Cali~orn~a, Depar~men~ o~ Forestry, 14~6 9~ S~=eet, Sacramento, Cali~ornia 95814. 9. This Agreemen~ may be amended a= any time by mu=ual consent to permit the addition or deletion o~ equipment. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as o~ the day and year ~irst written above.. Ukiah Fire Department Herein called Local Agency STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Forestry Fred W. KeDlinger Typed or printed name By Chief, Support Services Date Director of Public Safety By Title/Date Ranger Unit Adminis~ra~or Date FEDSTRIP AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL FIRE PROTECTION AID This AGREEMENT, made this day of ! 19 , by and between the Ukiah. Fire Department and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION, through its duly qualified and acting Director, hereinafter called CDF. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS: Ukiah Fire Department maintains and operates a fire protection organization in the area generally known as City of Ukiah XXX , and . CDF maintains and operates a fire protection organization for the purpose of providing basic wildland fire protection to State Responsibility Area lands which are adjacent or proximate to the area protected by Ukiah Fire Department , and , It is the desire of the parties hereto to render aid, each to the other, to combat the effect of fire, when such aid is necessary as herein set forth; and The parties hereto desire to effect the purpose of this agreement pursuan5 to the provisions of the "Joint Exercise of Power Act" (Gov. Code Section 6500-6547) and Health & Safety Code Section 13059. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: To furnish fire protection personnel and equipment and to render such'.fire protection services to each other as may be necessary to suppress fire of a size beyond the control of either of the parties hereto acting without the assistance of the other and control of which therefore requires assistance from the other. o Such mutual aid shall be provided within the County of Mendocino , provided, however, that neither party shall be required to reduce its own fire protection resources, personnel, services, and facilities to the detriment of its normal fire protection capability. o No response to a mutual aid request provided for in this agreement will be made by the parties hereto unless such request is received through the established communication channels common to each party and made by a responsible fire official of the party requesting such aid. That any mutual aid extended under this agreement will be extended with the express understanding that the fire official in charge (in whose jurisdiction a fire requiring mutual aid occurs) shall remain in charge at such incident including the direction of personnel and equipment provided through the operation of this mutual aid agreement. , Except as may be provided by separate agreement between the parties hereto, the assurance of mutual aid set forth herein shall constitute the sole consideration for the performance hereof and neither party shall be obligated to reimburse the other for any action taken or aid rendered hereunder, or for any use of material, damage to equipment, or liability incurred which may occur in the course of rendering the firefighting assistance herein provided for. That certain specialized types of fire protection resources may not be made available subject to the provisions of this.agreement, and that such resources will be available only on a reimbursement basis. . That all purchases to GSA and federal sources of supply using Fedstrip (activity code), be paid within 45~days upon receipt of invoice. CDF will prepare letter of collection for all unpaid invoices and will terminate Fedstrip for nonpayment. o This agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a period of five (5) years from the date hereinabove written unless sooner terminated by either of the parties giving to the other fifteen (15) days written notice of such termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties' hereto have caused this agreement to be executed as of the day and year first hereinabove written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION By: By: Region Chief/Date Ranger Unit Chief/Date Local Fire DePartment Signature: , ~ Printed Name: Fred W. Keplinger Title: Director of Public Safety ITEM NO. 8a DATE: August 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY ZONING MAP TO REZONE 51 LOTS IN THE WAGENSELLER NEIGHBORHOOD SUMMARY: On July 17, 1996, the City Council voted 4-0 to introduce an ordinance amending the City Zoning Map to rezone 51 lots in and around the Wagenseller neighborhood. Councilman Shoemaker recused himself from the introduction hearing due to a possible conflict of interest, and the ordinance is now before the Council for final adoption. The purpose of the rezoning project is to bring the zoning classifications of a number of privately owned properties into conformance with the Land Use Designation assigned in the New General Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the ordinance amending the City Zoning Map rezoning 51 lots in the Wagenseller Neighborhood. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTION: 1. Do not adopt the ordinance, and provide direction to staff. Citizen Advised: None Requested by: Planning Department Prepared by: Charley Stump, Senior Planner Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager and Bob Sawyer, Planning Director Attachments: 1. Ordinance amending the City Zoning Map APPROVED: au'Ca-~dace Hor-sley, C~y ~anager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA The City Council of the City of Ukiah does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION ONE Pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 9009 of the Ukiah City Code, the Official Zoning Map for the City of Ukiah is amended to change the zoning on a number of parcels in the Wagenseller Neighborhood from "C-2" (Highway Commercial / Restricted Industrial) to "13,-3.' (General Multiple Family Residential); "C-1" (Light Commercial) to "R-3" (General Multiple Family Residential); "C-2" (Highway Commercial / Restricted Industrial) to "R-I" (Single Family Residential); "C-1" (Light Commercial) to "R-I" (Single Family Residential); "C-1" (Light Commercial) to "R-3" (General Multiple Family Residential); and "R-3" (General Multiple Family Residential) to "C-1" (Light Commercial). The listing of the specific parcels involved in this rezoning action, along with detailed rezoning information is attached as Exhibit "A." SECTION TWO This ordinance shall be published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ukiah. SECTION THREE This rezoning action and amendment to the Official Zoning Map of the City of Ukiah is necessary to bring the zoning for the subject properties listed in Exhibit "A" into conformance with the new General Plan adopted on December 6, 1995. SECTION FOUR This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption. Introduced by title only on July 17, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mastin, Malone, Wattenberger, Mayor Schneiter NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Shoemaker ABSTAIN: None 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Passed and adopted on AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk , by the following role call vote: Fred Schneiter, Mayor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT "A" The Wagenseller Neighborhood Rezoning Project (96-24) Assessor's Current General Plan New Parcel No. Zoning Designation Zoning 002-091-07 c2 HDR R3 002-091-08 C2 HDR R3 002-091-09 C2 HDR R3 002-091-10 C2 HDR R3 002-091-11 C2 HDR R3 002-092-15 C2 HDR R3 002-092-18 C2 HDR R3 002-092-25 C2 HDR R3 002-092-26 C2 HDR R3 002-092-27 C2 HDR R3 002-092-28 C2 HDR R3 002-092-29 C2 HDR R3 002-092-30 C2 HDR R3 002-121-02 C2 HDR R3 002-121-04 C1 HDR R3 002-121-05 C1 HDR R3 002-121-08 C2 HDR R3 00:2-121-10 C2 HDR R3 002-121-11 C2 HDR R3 002-122-06 C2 LDR R1 002-122-07 C2 LDR R1 002-122-08 C2 LDR R1 002-122-09 C2 LDR R1 002-122-10 C2 LDR R1 002-122-11 C2 LDR R1 002-122-12 C2 LDR R1 002-122-13 C2 LDR R1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 002-122-14 C1 LDR R1 002-122-15 C2 LDR R1 002-123-04 C2 LDR R1 002-123-05 C2 LDR R1 002-123-06 C2 LDR R1 002-123-07 C2 LDR R1 002-123-08 C2 LDR R1 002-123-09 C2 LDR R1 002-151-04 C2 HDR R3 002-151-05 C2 HDR R3 002-151-06 C2 HDR R3 002-151-07 C2 HDR R3 002-151-08 C2 HDR R3 002-151-12 C1 HDR R3 002-153-07 R3 C C1 002-153-14 R3 C C1 002-153-15 R3 C C1 002-153-16 R3 C C1 002-153-22 R3 C C1 002-153-24 R3 C C1 002-153-29 R3 C C1 002-153-30 R3 C C1 002-153-33 R3 C C1 002-153-34 R3 C C1 ITEM NO. 8b DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF UKIAH AND REDWOOD BUSINESS PARK OWNERS, ET AL, FOR EXTENSION OF AIRPORT PARK BOULEVARD Information regarding this matter will be presented in the closed session scheduled on the City Council agenda. RECOMMENDED ACTION: A recommendation will be presented at the meeting. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Not applicable at this time. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Acct. No.: NA (if budgeted) N/A Michael F. Harris, AICP, Assistant City Manager Candace Horsley, City Manager None mfh:asrcc Candace Horsley, CityCanager 8796rbpagr ITEM NO. 9A DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 2580 AND 2581 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE TO REQUIRE DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING OF TAXI CAB DRIVERS As you are aware, the Director of Public Safety currently has the authority to issue a "driver's badge" to those individuals who are permitted to operate a taxi cab within the City limits. In order to comply with Government Code Section 53075.5, the City of Ukiah must adopt regulations which require drug and alcohol testing of taxi cab drivers. Under these new regulations, an individual applying for a driver's badge would be required to submit to a drug and alcohol test upon application and then annually thereafter on a recertification basis. The taxi cab company or the driver would be responsible for the costs associated with the required tests. Currently, there is only one taxi cab company operating within the City limits. Attached for your consideration is a proposed ordinance for introduction which was prepared by the City Attorney. Appendix B of the City's Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy for its employees with commercial driver's licenses is also attached for your information. Staff recommends that the City Council introduce the ordinance by title only in order to comply with Government Code Section 53075.5. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Introduce ordinance by title only amending Sections 2580 and 2581 of the Ukiah City Code. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Do Not Introduce Ordinance. 2. Amend and Introduce Ordinance. 3. Refer to Staff for further information. Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by- Kari Revheim, Personnel 0fficer~~ Coordinated with: David Rapport, City Attorney Fred Keplinger, Director of Public Safety Candace Horsley, City Manager Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance for introduction. 2. Appendix B. 3:PER~ASR.TAXZ Candace Horsley, %ity Manager ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING ARTICLE 5, CHAPTER 5, DIVISION 2 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE TO REQUIRE DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING OF TAXI CAB DRIVERS In order to comply with the requirements of Government Code Section 53075.5, effective January 1, 1996, the City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows. SECTION ONE. Article 5 of Chapter 5, Division 2 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended by amending section 2580 and 2581 to read as follows: 2580: DRIVERS' BADGES REQUIRED It shall be unlawful for any person to drive any vehicle for hire, taxicab, or sightseeing automobile within the City of Ukiah, except as provided in section 2530, without first having obtained a driver's badge from the Director of Public Safety or his or her designee. 1. Application. Within fifteen (15) days of receiving a completed application on a form approved by resolution of the City Council and all information required to be submitted with the form, the Director of Public Safety shall include the driver on the For Hire Vehicle Permit issued pursuant to section 2533 and issue a drivers' badge as described by resolution of the City Council, unless he or she finds any of the following: a. The applicant is under the age of eighteen (18); b. The applicant does not possess a valid California driver's license of the class required for the vehicle he or she will operate; c. The applicant is an undocumented or illegal alien; d. The applicant tests positive for controlled substances or alcohol, where: (1) "Controlled substance" means marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines and phencyclidine. (2) "Tests positive" means: (a) with respect to alcohol, an alcohol screening test showing a breath alcohol concentration of 0.02 percent or more; and s:\u\ords96\taxi.drg August 1, 1996 i (b) with respect to a controlled substance means the cutoff levels for the initial and confirmatory tests as provided in 49 C.F.R. §40.29 (e) and (f) . (3) Ail tests for alcohol and controlled substances shall be conducted by the applicant's employer in conformity with Appendix B to the City of Ukiah Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy for Employees with Commercial Driver's Licenses and 49 C.F.R. Parts 40 (commencing with Section 40.1) and 382. The employer must certify as part of the application that it has conducted the required tests and must report any positive test results to the Police Department as part of the application. Self- employed independent drivers shall provide a copy of the laboratory report of the test results directly to the Police Department. (4) Ail controlled substance and alcohol test results shall be treated as confidential information and shall not be disclosed without the driver's consent, except as authorized or required by law. No evidence drived from positive test results shall be admissible in a criminal prosecution concerning unlawful possession, sale or distribution of controlled substances. (5) If a driver received a license based on a negative test result from another city or county within the state within a period of one year prior to the date of applicaton, the applicant's employer or self-employed independent driver may submit the license or test result in lieu of a new test; provided, the test from the other jurisdiction was part of a controlled substance and alcohol testing certification program meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 53075.5. (6) If a license application is denied based on this section, requirements for rehabilitation, reapplication, follow-up testing and other requirements shall be as provided in 49 C.F.R. Part 382 (commencing with Section 382.101). In other words, an applicant may be eligible for a driver's badge after referral to a substance abuse professional, compliance with a recommended rehabilitation program, follow-up random drug and/or controlled substance testing, and negative test results. All such conditions shall be set forth in writing by the Police Department as preconditions to obtaining and keeping a driver's badge issued subsequent to a postive test result. (7) The driver and/or his or her employer shall pay all costs of testing and any referrals, rehabilitation counselling and follow-up testing that may be required. e. Within five (5) years of the date of application, the applicant has been convicted by any state or federal court of a crime (whether designated a felony, misdemeanor or infraction) involving serious or persistent and improper s:\u\ords96\taxi.drg August 1, 1996 2 operation or maintenance of a motor vehicle, violence or the threatened use of violence or force, dishonesty, theft, destruction of property, pandering, sexual misconduct or the use, sale or possession of alcohol or controlled substances; f. Within five (5) years of the date of application, the City or another jurisdiction has revoked a drivers' permit required by this Chapter or a similar permit issued to the applicant; g. Within. five (5) years of the date of application, a state or federal court judgment has been rendered against the applicant rendering him or her liable (other than vicariously or strictly liable) in money damages for personal injury or property damage or restraining him or her from acts of personal harassment, assault or battery; or h. Within five (5) years of the date of application, the applicant has violated any provision of this Chapter or committed any other act which the Director of Public Safety determines creates a serious risk of harm to the public health, safety or welfare, if the permit is granted. 2. Appeal of denial. Any person whose application is denied shall have the right to appeal that decision to the City Manager and City Council in accordance with the procedure provided in section 2534. 2581: SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF BADGE 1. Immediate Suspension or revocation. The Director of Public Safety may immediately suspend or revoke a driver's badge on any of the following grounds: a. A suspension or revocation of his or her driver's license; b. The driver caused a motor vehicle accident, causing more than $500 in property damage or bodily injury or death; or c. The Director receives notice that the driver is no longer covered by liability insurance. d. The driver tests positive for alcohol or controlled substances during an annual recertification test. Annual recertification tests for controlled substances and alcohol shall be required on or after the anniversary date for each driver issued a driver's badge. The Police Department will issue a notice to the driver specifying the date, time and place of the annual recertification test. If the driver was subject to a test meeting the requirements of this section within a period of one year from s:\u\ords96\taxi.drg August 1, 1996 3 the date of recertification as part of a driver recertification program in another California city or county, the test from that other jurisdiction will satisfy' the requirements of this subsection, unless the earlier test yielded a positive test result. In the event of an immediate suspension or revocation under this subsection 1 the Director of Public Safety shall immediately provide the notice and opportunity for a hearing provided in subsection 3, except that the suspension or revocation shall remain in effect unless or until reversed by decision of the City Manager or City Council. It shall be unlawful and constitute a violation of this Chapter for any driver to operate a For Hire motor vehicle after notice of the suspension or revocation has been given. 2. Suspension or revocation with opportunity for prior notice and opportunity for a hearing. The Director of Public Safety may suspend or revoke a driver's badge with prior notice and opportunity for a hearing based on any of the following grounds: a. Any misrepresentation or omission of a material fact on the application for the badge; b. Any of the grounds for denying a badge as stated in section 2580; c. Any violation of any provision of this Chapter; or d. Any act which tends to endanger the public health or safety, if the driver is allowed to continue operating a vehicle for which a driver's badge is required. 3. Procedure. Five (5) working .days prior to the effective date of the suspension or revocation under subsection 2, the Director of Public Safety shall serve a copy of a notice of suspension or revocation on the badge holder. The notice shall be personally served or sent by first class mail to the address on file with the Director of Public Safety. The notice shall be deemed served when personally delivered to the badge holder or when deposited in the United States mail. The notice shall state the grounds for the suspension or revocation, the facts supporting the decision and the dates when the suspension will begin and end or the effective date of revocation. The notice shall inform the badge holder that the decision will not become effective, if he or she files with the Director of Public Safety an appeal of the decision prior to the effective date. The badge holder has no right of appeal unless he or she files the request for an appeal prior to the effective date of the suspension or revocation. The City Manager or City Council shall hear the appeal in accordance with section 2534. After hearing the appeal the City Manager or s:\u\ords96\taxi.drg August 1, 1996 4 City Council may suspend, revoke or impose conditions on the use of the badge and shall specify the effective dates of the suspension, revocation or conditions. SECTION TWO. The amendments herein requiring controlled substance and alcohol testing shall apply to all applications for a driver's badge received after the effective date of this Ordinance. Annual recertifications shall be required of all drivers, commencing one year after they were first issued a driver's badge. SECTION THREE. This Ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. Introduced by title only on following roll call vote: , 1996, by the AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Adopted on vote: , 1996, by the following roll call · · AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Fred Schneiter, Mayor Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk s:\u\ords96\taxi.drg August 1, 1996 5 APPENDIX B ALCOHOL AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES TESTING PROCEDURES AND POLICY INTRODUCTION The City of Ukiah shall Implement and enforce the procedures for transportation workplace testing as set forth in 49 CFR Part 40. These procedures include, but are not limited to the following information. In all cases, the requirements of 49 CFR Part 40 shall be followed. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES TESTING APPLICABLE DRUGS 1. Employees subject to controlled substances testing shall be tested for the following substances: Marijuana Opiates Phencyclidine (PCP) Cocaine Amphetamines 2. Although the specimen will not be analyzed specifically for adulterants, the lab may conduct adulteration checks (PH, specific gravity or creatinine). The test may be cancelled if adulterants are detected. The lab is permitted to check for adulterants as per Federal Department of Transportation (DOT) guidelines. SPECIMEN COLLECTION PROCEDURES 1. The collection shall take place in a secure location to prevent unauthorized access during the collection process. 2. The specimen shall be kept in sight of the employee and the collection site person until it is sealed and ready for shipment. 3. Employees shall have Individual privacy when providing a specimen except when: a. The employee presents a specimen that is outside the accepted temperature range and he/she refuses to have an oral body temperature measurement, or the body temperature measurement varies more than loc or 1.8oF from the specimen temperature. b. The collector observes the employee attempting to adulterant or substitute the specimen. c. The employee's last provided specimen was determined to be diluted. d. The employee has previously had a verified positive test. In a and b above, the employee must provide a specimen under direct observation. In c and d above, the Employer may require a direct observation collection. 4. The following specific procedures will be followed during the collection process: a. The employee must submit identification to the collector. The collection shall not proceed until a positive identification is made. b. The employee will not be required to undress, or to change into an examination gown. Only outer garments should be removed, i.e., jackets, etc. c. The donor shall be required to wash his/her hands prior to urination, and shall not have access to any water sources until the specimen has been collected. d. A bluing agent shall be added to the toilet bowl and the donor may flush the toilet only after releasing the specimen to the collector. e. The specimen must be at least 45 mi to be acceptable. f. The collector must measure the specimen temperature within four (4) minutes of urination to determine sample acceptability. 5. If the donor cannot provide a sufficient volume of urine, he/she shall remain at the collection site and be provided not more than twenty-four (24) ounces of fluids to drink. The donor shall have a period of up to two (2) hours to produce an acceptable sample. If the donor is unable to produce a sample without a valid medical reason, the City shall consider the circumstance to be a refusal to test. 6. The specimen shall be divided into two (2) parts. The collector shall pour 30 mi of urine from the specimen bottle into a second bottle, to be used as the pdmary specimen. The remainder of the urine, at least 15 mi, shall be poured into another container to be used as the split sample. 7. Both samples shall be shipped in a single shipping container with the appropriate chain of custody forms. . The collector and donor must be present together to complete the following process: a. Seal and label the specimen bottle. Donor initials the bottle label or seal. The chain of custody forms must be signed and dated. 9. If an employee refuses to cooperate with the collection process, the collector shall notify the employer representative and note the non-cooperation on the custody and control form. SPLIT SAMPLE 1. If the test result of the primary specimen is positive, the employee may, no later than seventy-two (72) hours, request that the MRO direct that the split specimen be analyzed. 2. The split sample analysis will be conducted by a DHHS-certified laboratory who will analyze the sample for presence of the drug(s) for which a positive result was obtained in the primary sample. 3. If the result of the test of the split sample fails to reconfirm the presence of the drug(s) or drug metabolite(s) in the primary specimen, the MRO shall' cancel the test and report the cancellation to the City. 4. All costs associated with the analysis of the split sample shall be the responsibility of the employer, unless the test confirms a positive result, in which case the employee shall pay for the second test. ALCOHOL TESTING TESTING PROCEDURES 1. The test shall take place in a secure location that affords visual and aural privacy to prevent unauthorized persons from seeing or hearing test results. 2. When an employee enters the testing location, the Breath Alcohol Technician (BAT) will require him/her to provide positive Identification. The test shall not proceed until positive identification of the employee is made. 3. An individually-sealed mouthpiece shall be opened in view of the employee and then attached to the testing unit. 4. The employee shall be required to blow forcefully into the mouthpiece for at least six (6) seconds or until an adequate amount of breath has been obtained. 5. The employee shall be shown the result both on the testing unit and the recording forml The employee shall verify both results are the same. If a result printed by the testing unit does not match the displayed result, the BAT shall declare the test invalid. 6. If the result of the screening test is less than 0.02 breath alcohol concentration, no other testing will be conducted. 7. If the result of the screening test reflects an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater, a confirmation test shall be performed. 8. Prior to conducting the confirmation test, the employee may not eat, drink, or place anything in his/her mouth. If possible, the employee should not belch during the waiting period. The confirmation test shall be conducted no less than fifteen (15) minutes and no more than twenty (20) minutes from the screening test. The fifteen (15) minutes waiting period is provided for the employee's benefit. This time period allows for the dissipation of any mouth alcohol, thereby helping to prevent an artificially high reading. 9. In the event the screening and the confirmation test results do not match, the confirmation results will be considered the final results. 10. If the employee refuses to sign the breath alcohol testing form or fails to provide an adequate amount of breath without a valid medical reason, the City shall determine the circumstance to be a refusal to test. INABILITY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE BREATH 1. If the employee fails to provide an adequate amount of breath, he/she shall provide the City with an evaluation from a licensed physician, who is acceptable to the City, concerning the employee's medical ability to provide adequate breath. 2. If the physician determines there is a valid medical reason precluding the employee from providing adequate breath, then the employee's failure shall not be deemed a refusal to test. 3. If the physician is unable to determine a valid medical reason, the employee's failure to provide adequate breath shall be considered a refusal to test. ITEM NO. 9-B DATE: August 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF FINAL REPORT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION FEASIBILITY STUDY SUMMARY: This report prepared by Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation Inc. (W-Trans) of Santa Rosa presents the results of a feasibility study to determine the potential benefits of interconnecting and coordinating eleven signalized intersections along the State Street Corridor. Nine of these intersections are within the City of Ukiah and the remaining two are owned by the County of Mendocino. The County-owned signals are maintained by the City under an agreement with the County. As part of the traffic analysis, operating conditions during the noon and pm peak hours were evaluated at the eleven intersections under existing conditions and with projected coordinated operation. Funding for this project came from two sources. The Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG) provided LTF funds to respond to their 1995/1996 Work Element #19, Signal Coordination Feasibility, which has the stated objective of improving arterial traffic movement in Ukiah. The remaining funds came form the City's Gas Tax allocation in the amount of $10,000. (continued on page 2) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Receive report; and 2. direct staff to consider implementation of Alternative #4 shown on Figure 5 of the report during the 1997-1998 fiscal year and to seek funding from MCOG. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Direct staff to reprogram current project funds to allow construction and implementation of Alternative #4 at an estimated cost of $37,950. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.: Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised' N/A Requested by: Prepared by: Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Rick Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Final Report Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study dated July 8, 1996 Candace H~rsley, Cit~ Ma~nager Page 2 ITEM NO. 9-B DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 Under existing conditions all but one of the study intersections are operating at Level of Service (LOS) C or better during the midday peak hour. South State Street/Perkins Street is operating at LOS E during the midday peak. During the PM peak hour, seven of the study intersections are operating at LOS C or better. South State Street/Hastings Avenue- Washington Avenue, South State Street/Talmage Road, South State Street/Perkins Street, and North State Street/Empire Drive-Ford Road are all at LOS D during the PM peak hour. Under project coordinated conditions with coordinated operation along State Street, ten of the eleven study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the midday peak period. LOS D operation would be expected for the intersection of South State Street/Perkins Street. During the PM peak period, South State Street/Perkins Street and South State Street/Talmage Road would be expected to operate at LOS D. The remaining intersections would be expected to operate at LOS C or better. Travel times and travel speeds would be expected to improve by an average of approximately 24 percent over existing, uncoordinated conditions during the midday period. A minor improvement would be expected during the PM peak period for northbound traffic, but southbound traffic would be expected to experience a decrease in speed and an increase in travel time. A number of alternatives including various geometric improvements were also considered. Five alternatives were evaluated which included combinations of the following geometric improvements. Install a left-turn pocket and protected left-turn phasing southbound at Talmage Road. Install left-turn pockets northbound and southbound at Mill Street. Retain the existing permissive phasing. Install left-turn pockets and protected left-turn phasing northbound and southbound at Perkins Street. Install a left-turn pocket and protected left-turn phasing southbound at Standley Street. Install a left-turn pocket northbound at Scott Street. Retain the existing permissive phasing. Install a left-turn pocket southbound at Norton Street. Retain the existing permissive phasing. The alternative which was determined to have the greatest benefit includes the installation of left-turn pockets and protected left-turn phasing at Talmage Road, Perkins Street, and Standley Street which is described as alternative 4. Page 3 ITEM NO. 9-B DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 Cost/benefit ratios were developed for each of the scenarios evaluated based on planning level cost estimates and projected operational improvements. The installation of hardwire interconnect and implementation of coordinated timing was found to have the highest cost per unit of improvement at $129,400 in cost per mile per hour increase in average travel speed. Installation of a left-turn pocket and protected left-turn phasing southbound at Talmage Road was found to have the lowest cost per unit of improvement at $8,600 in cost per mile per hour increase in average travel speed. Recommendations of the report include the following. The installation of hardwire interconnect is not recommended due to the high cost relative to the anticipated benefit. Although the report recommends that the City implement time-based coordination staff does not concur with this recommendation at this time. However, staff recommends installing left-turn pockets and protected left-turn phasing at Talmage Road, Perkins Street, and Standley Street. Through the next agenda report, staff is proposing to construct a Hazard Elimination Safety project which would construct protected left-turn pockets and protected left-turn phasing at Talmage Road, and Mill Street. Left-turn pockets and protected left-turn phasing at Perkins Street and Standley Street will be considered in the FY 1997/1998 budget. RJS:AGSlGCOR.SUM Final Report Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study for the City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 Printed on Recycled Paper DJW/UKI001.RI WHITLOCK ~-WEINBERGER TRANSPORTATION I NC 2200 Range Avenue, Suite 102, Santa Rosa, California, 95403, (707) 542-9500, FAX (707) 542-9590 Table of Contents Introduction and Summary .............................................................. 1 Study Parameters Existing Conditions ' 6 Coordination Feasibility Analysis ....................................................... 10 Alternatives Analysis .................................................................. 12 Cost/Benefit Analysis .................................................................. 20 Recommendations .................................................................... 2 Study Participants and References Figures I State Street Corridor ............................................. , ................... 2 2 Alternative # 1 - Geometrics and Phasing . .~ .............................................. 13 3 Alternative #2'- Geometrics and Phasing ................................................ 14 4 Alternative #3 - Geometrics and Phasing ................................................ 15 5 Alternative #4 - Geometrics and Phasing ............................ .................... 16 6 Alternative #5 - Geometrics and Phasing ................................................ 17 Tables 1 Intersection Level of Service Criteria .................................................... 5 2 Saturation Flow Rate Summary .................. i ...................................... 7 3 Summary of Intersection Level of Service Calculations ...................................... 8 4 Floating Car Results ........................... , ..................................... 9 5 Travel Time/Travel Speed Comparison ................................................. 10 6 Comparison of Intersection Level of Service Calculations ................................... 11 7 Comparison of Alternatives ........................................................... 18 8 Cost/Benefit Comparison ............................................................ 20 Appendices A Description of Intersection Capacity Analysis Methodologies B Intersection Level of Service Calculations C Planning Level Cost Estimates Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 Introduction and Summary Introduction This report presents the results of a feasibility study to determine the potential benefits of interconnecting and coordinating eleven signalized intersections along the State Street corridor. Nine of these intersections are within the City of Ukiah and the remaining two are owned by the County of Mendocino. The County-owned signals are maintained by the City under an agreement with the County. The study area is shown in Figure 1. As part of the traffic analysis, operating conditions during the noon and p.m. peak hours were evaluated at the ten intersections under existing conditions and with projected coordinated operation. Funding for this' project came from two sources. The Mendocino County of Governments (MCOG) provided LTF funds to respond to their 1995/1996 Work Element # 19, Signal Coordination Feasibility, which has the stated objective of improving arterial traffic movement in Ukiah. The remaining funds came from the City of Ukiah's Gas Tax allocation. Summary Existing Conditions Under Existing conditions all but one of the study intersections are operating at Level of Service (LOS) C or better during the midday peak hour. South State Street/Perkins Street is operating at LOS E during the midday peak. During the p.m. peak hour seven of the study intersections are operating at LOS C or better. South State Street/Hastings Road-Washington Street, South State Street/Talmage Road, South State Street/Perkins Street, and North State Street/Empire Drive-Ford Road are all at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. Coordinated Condition.q Under projected conditions with coordinated operation along State Street, ten of the eleven study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the midday peak period. LOS D operation would be expected for the intersection of South State Street/Perkins Street. During the p.m. peak period, South State Street/Perkins Street and South State Street/Talmage Road would be expected to operate at LOS D. The remaining intersections would be expected to operate at LOS C or better. Travel times and travel speeds would be expected to improve by an average of approximately 24 percent over existing, uncoordinated conditions during the midday period. A minor improvement would be expected during the p.m. peak period for northbound traffic, but southbound traffic would be expected to experience a decrease in speed and an increase in travel time. Alternatives Analysis A number of altematives including various geometric improvements were also considered. Five altematives were evaluated which included combinations of the following geometric improvements. Install a left-turn pocket and protected left-turn phasing southbound at Talmage Road. Install left-mm pockets northbound and southbound at Mill Street. Retain the existing permissive phasing. Install left-mm pockets and protected left-turn phasing northbound and southbound at Perkins Street. Install a left-mm pocket and protected left-mm phasing southbound at Standley Street. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibihty Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 1 July 8, 1996 Em Brush Street Street Noi to Scale LEGEND Signalized Study Intersections Washington Avenue Road Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Figure 1 State Street Corridor ~. ~.,,, Whitlook & Weinberger Transportation Ino. City of Ukiah UICIO0 I.DRW 4/~& Install left-turn pocket northbound at Scott Street. Retain the existing permissive phasing. Install left-turn pocket southbound at Norton Street. Retain the existing permissive phasing. The alternative which was determined to have the greatest benefit includes the installation of left-turn pockets and protected left-turn phasing at Talmage Road, Perkins Street and Standley Street. Cost/Benefit Analysis Cost/Benefit ratios were developed for each of the scenahos evaluated based on planning level cost estimates and projected operational improvements. The installation ofhardwire interconnect and implementation of coordinated timing were found to have the highest cost per unit of improvement at $129,400 in cost per mile per hour increase in average travel speed. Installation of a left-mm pocket and protected left-mm phasing southbound at Talmage Road was found to have the lowest cost per unit of improvement at $8,600 in cost per mile per hour increase in average travel speed. Recommendations The installation of hardwire interconnect is not recommended due to the high cost relative to the anticipated benefit. It is recommended that left-turn pockets be installed and protected left-turn phasing be implemented at Talmage Road, Perkins Street and Standley Street. · Additionally, it is recommended that the City consider implementation of time-based coordination. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Wemberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 3 July 8, 1996 Study Parameters Study Area The study area consists of the State Street comdor beginning at Washington Avenue-Hastings Road on the southern end and extending to KUKI Lane on the north, including the following eleven intersections. . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. South State Street/Washington Avenue-Hastings Road South State Street/Talmage-Road South State Street/Gobbi Street South State Street/Mill Street State Street/Perkins Street State Street/Standley Street State Street/Scott Street State Street/Norton Street North State Street/Low Gap Road-Brash Street North State Street/Ford Road-Empire Drive North State Street/KUKI Lane Study Methodology The focus of this feasibility study was on the potential benefit which could be achieved by interconnecting and coordinating the eleven study intersections along State Street. In order to provide this comparison, fa'st the existing conditions at the study intersections were carefully evaluated. The operating conditions which would exist with coordinated timing were then projected, and the comparison performed. Both the midday and evening peak hours were evaluated. Intersection Level of Service Methodology Level of ServiCe (LOS) is used to rank traffic operation on various types of facilities based on traffic volumes and roadway capacity using a series of letter designations ranging from A to F. Generally, Level of Service A represents free flow conditions and Level of Service F represents forced flow or breakdown conditions. The LOS designation is generally accompanied by a unit of measure which 'indicates a level of delay. The levels of service for the study intersections were analyzed using the signalized intersection capacity method from the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Special Report No. 209, 1985, and volumes for the highest hour during each peak period. This method determines a level of delay for each approach and the intersection as a whole by estimating the level of average delay in seconds per vehicle. The intersection Level of Service criteria are shown in Table 1 on the following page. Arterial Level of Service Methodology The criteria for arterial levels of service found in Chapter 11, "Urbm'~ and Suburban Arterials," of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994, was used for this analysis. This methodology is oriented toward the evaluation of an existing operations situation or a specific design proposal by a level of service determination. This .method does not address the capacity of a facility, but rather determines a level of service based on average Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 4 July 8, 1996 through-vehicle travel speed. The average travel speed is computed from the mnmng time on the arterial segment and the intersection delay for through movements at all intersections. The travel speed is strongly influenced by the number of signals per mile, their specific spacing, and the quality of progressive timing. More complete descriptions of the methodologies and the Level of Service criteria are provided in Appendix A. Table 1 Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Type of Delay Maneuverability Service Flow A Stable Very slight or no delay. No approach phase is Turning movements are easily made, and Flow fully utilized and no driver waits through two nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. red signals. B Stable Slight delay. An occasional approach phase is Vehicle platoons are formed. Many drivers Flow fully utilized, begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C Stable Acceptable delay. A few drivers arriving at Back-ups may develop behind turning Flow the end of a queue may occasionally wait vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat through one cycle, restricted. D Approaching Tolerable delay. Delays may be substantial Maneuverability is severely limited during Unstable during short periods, but excessive back ups short periods due to temporary back ups. Flow do not occur. E Unstable Flow Intolerable delay. Delay may be great--up to There are typically long queues of vehicles several signal cycles, waiting upstream of the intersection. F Forced Flow Excessive delay Jammed conditions. Back ups from one movement may restrict or prevent other movements. Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. 'City of Ukiah Page 5 July 8, 1996 Existing Conditions Data Collection The purpose of the Existing Conditions analysis was to document the existing operation of the study system. This data provides the benchmark for comparison of projected conditions after implementation of coordinated timing. The data collected was used both to ensure the accuracy of input data as well as to substantiate the output data. Existing turning movement counts for both the midday and p.m. peaks were either obtained from the City or manually obtained between May 21-30, 1996. The data which was field vehfied included signal phasing, lane geometrics, saturation flow rates, and travel time. Additionally, each intersection was photographed, videotaped, and an inventory of all existing equipment was obtained. Intersection Inventories Washington Avenue-Hasting Road/South State Street is a four-legged intersection under five phase operation with protected left-tums on the northbound and southbound approaches. The traffic signal is operated by a Multisonics 820A controller located on the northwest comer. The intersection is fully actuated with detector loops on all approaches. The northbound and southbound advance loops on South State Street have the same loop addresses as the head loops. There are audible pedestrian signals for all crossings. Talmage Road/South State Street is a T-intersection under three phase operation, with the northbound and southbound approaches spht phased. The traffic signal is operated by a Multisonics 820A controller located on the west side of the street. The intersection is fully actuated with loops on all approaches. The advance loops on all approaches have the same detector loop addresses as the head loops. All crossings have audible pedestrian signals. Gobbi Street/South State Street is a four legged intersection under eight phase operation with protected left-tums on all approaches. The intersection is operated by a 911 traffic controller located on the northeast comer. The intersection is fully actuated, and the advance loops have the same loop addresses as the head loops. All crossings have audible pedestrian signals. There are audible pedestrian signals for all crossings. Mill Street/South State Street is a four legged intersection under two-phase operation. The intersection is operated by a 911 traffic controller located on the southeast comer. The intersection is fully actuated, and the advance loops have the same loop addresses as the head loops. All crossings have audible pedesthan signals. Perkins Street/State Street is a four-legged intersection under three-phase operation, with the northbound and southbound approaches split-phased. The west leg is a one way street away from the intersection in the westbound direction. The intersection is run by a Multisonics 820A controller located on the west side' of the intersection. Perkins Street/State Street is interconnected with Standley Street/State Street with the controller at Perkins Street/State Street acting as the master controller. The intersection is fully actuated without any advance loops. The intersection has audible pedestrian heads at all the street crossings. Standley Street/State Street is a fully actuated intersection under three-phase operation. The east leg of the intersection is a one way street in the eastbound direction. The intersection is run by a Multisonics 820A controller located on the west side of the intersection. The Standley Street/State Street controller is interconnected with the controller at Perkins Street/State Street and during certain periods of the day it acts as a slave, with the controller at Perkins Street/State Street acting as a master controller. Standley Street/State Street has no advance loops, and has audible pedestrian heads northbound and southbound. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 6 July 8, 1996 Scott Street/North State Street and Norton Street/Noah State Street are actually a single intersection with an offset of appro.,dmately 160 feet between Scott Street and Norton Street. This offset intersection has two-phase operation with a 911 traffic controller located on the west side. The intersection is fully actuated with the advance loops and the head loops having the same loop addresses. The intersection has audible pedestrian heads at street crossings located on outside of the intersection, noah of Norton Street and south Scott Street. Because of the offset at this intersection, it is treated as two intersections for analysis purposes. Low Gap Road-Brush Street/North State Street is a four-legged intersection with two-phase operation and a 170 Controller located on the northwest comer. There are head and advance loops on all approaches, but the loops are not operable, therefore the intersection is currently nmmng in a fixed time mode. Ford Road-Empire Drive/North State Street is a four approach intersection under eight phase operation with protected left-tums on all approaches. The intersection is operated by a 911 traffic controller located on the northwest comer. The intersection is fully actuated, and the advance loops have the same loop addresses as the head loops. During the field review it was observed that westbound vehicles turning left "cut" the turn entering the northbound left turn lane thereby activating the loop. KUKI Lane/~orth State Street is a four apprOach intersection with five-phase operation with protected left-tums northbound and southbound. The westbound approach of the intersection is a shopping center driveway. The intersection is nm by a Multisonics 820A controller located on the northwest comer of the intersection and is fully actuated with the advance and head loops having the same loop addresses. Saturation Flow Rates Because saturation flow rates can have a significant impact on the results output from any computer simulation/ optimization program, saturation flow rates were measured for a number of approach types. The methodology used to determine saturation flow rates is contained in the Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies, First Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1994. For this calculation it is assumed that free flow is attained after the third vehicle which is queued at the beginning of green enters the 'intersection. The average time needed for each remaining vehicle which was queued up at the beginning of the cycl'e then forms the basis for determimng the saturation flow rate. Typically at least six cycles were sampled. It was assumed that the flow rates for each type of approach do not vary substantially by time of day or from intersection to intersection, so some of the flow rates represent an average of data at more than one intersection. The approach types and associated saturation flows are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Saturation Flow Rate Summary Approach Type Saturation Flow Rate Through only lanes with free flow 1525 Left-turn lanes with protected phasing 1113 Through/right-turn lanes with free flow and minimal pedestrian 1207 activity - Through/left-mm lanes with protected phasing and free flow 1267 · Through/left-mm lanes with permissive phasing and free flow 1084 Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. Page 7 City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 It should be noted that the saturation flow rates obtained through fiela measurement are substantially' lower than is typically assumed for ideal conditions. This may be due to the less urbanized nature of the City of Ukiah, and is indicative of a fairly patient and unhurried driver population. Intersection Levels of Service Under Existing conditions all but one of the study intersections are operating at Level of Service (LOS) C or better during the midday peak hour. South State Street/Perkins Street is operating at LOS E during the midday peak. During the p.m peak hour seven of the study intersections are operating at LOS C or better. South State Street/Hastings Road-Washington Street, South State Street/Talmage Road, South State Street/Perkins Street, and North State Street/Empire Drive-Ford Road are all at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. The levels of service are summmzed in Table 3, and copies of the calculations are provided in Appendix B. Table 3 Summary of Intersection Level of Service Calculations Existing Conditions' Intersection Midday Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 1. Washington Avenue-Hastings 11.0 B 26.6 D Road/South State Street 2. Talmage Road/South State Street 24.1 C 35.9 D 3. Gobbi Street/South State Street 18.8 C 19.9 C 4. Mill Street/South State Street 6.9 B 7.5 B 5. Perkins Street/State Street 43.7 E 35.7 D 6. Standley Street/State Street 21.6 C 17.2 C 7. Scott Street/North State Street 2.4 A 3.7 A 8. Norton Street/North State Street 3.1 A 2.0 A · 9. Low Gap Road-Brash Street/ 19.0 C 14.2 B North State Street 10. Ford Road-Empire Drive/North 23.6 C 25.8 D State Street 11. KUKI Lane/North State Street 11.6 B 14.1 B Notes Delay is in average seconds per vehicle Refer to Appendix A for Level of Service Methodology Descriptions Refer to Appendix B for Level of Service Calculations Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. Page 8 City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 The levels of service summarized in Table 3 reflect the average conditions over an entire hour. Due to peaking charactefistcs, there may be higher or lower delays during different parts of the hour. A review of the volumes during 15-minute increments indicates that volumes are fairly even throughout the noon hour, and typically increase slightly during the period from 4:30-5:15 p.m., after which they drop off. Queue Lengths Each of the study intersections was observed during the peak periods to evaluate the maximum queue length for selected movements. Queue lengths generally did not exceed five vehicles, and averaged approximately two vehicles at most intersections. Travel Time Travel time was determined using the methodology contained in the Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies, First Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1994. Four floating car nms were completed in each direction during each of the time periods. Data was averaged for all of the runs during each peak period by direction for the entire segment from Washington Avenue-Hastings Road on the southern end and extending to KUKI Lane on the north end. Table 4 Floating Car Results Direction/Peak Period Average Travel Average Total Average Average Time Stopped Delay Number of Travel Speed (minutes) (minutes) Stops (mph) Northbound/Midday 7:28 2.13 5.75 19.7 SouthbotmWMidday 7:30 1.57 5.25 19.6 Northbound/P.M. Peak 7:34 2.32 6.00 19.4 Southbotmd/P.M. Peak . 6'25 I 37 3 50 . 22 9 It can be seen that travel speeds during the midday and p.m. peak periods average less than 25 mph when stopped delay time is included. Based on the level of service criteria contained in the Highway Capacity Manual, the roadway is operating at LOS B in both. directions'during both peaks if considered a Class III urban arterial. If the roadway is considered a Class II intermediate arterial (someWhere between urban and suburban), it is operating at LOS C during both peaks in both directions. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 9 July 8, 1996 Coordination Feasibility Analysis Results of Coordination Analysis In order to evaluate the potential benefits of interconnecting and coordinating the State Street Corridor, the existing midday and p.m. peak hour volumes were input to two different tinting optimization programs to develop coordinated traffic signal timing. The program PASSER II-90 was used to develop the optimal phasing configuration, then the phasing was input to TRANSYT 7-F to develop green time splits and evaluate measures of effectiveness for the corridor. So that a fair comparison could be'made between existing, uncoordinated conditions and projected coordinated conditions, the feasibility analysis was based on existing traffic volumes and the existing phasing and lane configurations. Planned improvements to provide protected left-mm phasing at Low Gap Road-Brush Road/North State Street were not considered as part of the feasibility analysis. During previous projects, the differences between travel times and speeds obtained through floating car studies and the results obtained by simulating actual signal timing have been evaluated. These previous studies indicate that the computer simulation of actual conditions provides speeds which are up to 25 percent slower than those obtained through field observation. In reviewing the results of computer simulation for both the midday and p.m. peak periods, it appears that the estimated speeds obtained from the computer model are probably low. The speeds were therefore increased by a factor of 25 percent and the travel times decreased by 25 percent. The projected travel times and speeds for coordinated conditions are shown in Table 5 along with the previously reported travel times and speeds for existing, uncoordinated conditions. Table 5 Travel Time/Travel Speed Comparison Direction/Peak Period Existing Conditions Coordinated Conditions Average Travel Average Travel Average Travel Average Travel Time (minutes) Speed (mph) Time (minutes) Speed (mph) Northbound/Midday 7:28 19.7 6:08 24.0 Southbound/Midday 7:30 19.6 5:40 24.6 Northbound/P.M. Peak 7:34 19.4 7:26 21.0 Southbound/P.M. Peak 6:25 22.9 7:16 22.2 As can be seen in Table 5, the average speeds may be expected to increase by approximately 21.8 percent northbound and 25.5 percent southbound during the midday peak period. During the p.m. peak period, the northbound direction may be expected to experience an 8.2 percent increase in speed, but speeds in the southbound direction would be expected to decrease by approximately 3.1 percent. If State Street is considered a Class II arterial, the projected coordinated conditions would translate to LOS B operation during the midday, an improvement from LOS C under existing conditions, and LOS C operation during the p.m. peak, the same as under existing conditions. Using the criteria for a Class III arterial, the roadway is projected to operate at LOS B during both peak periods, the same as under existing conditions. It is not unusual for the implementation of coordinated timing to have 'a deleterious effect on operations at certain intersections. The levels of service at each of the study intersections were therefore evaluated with the projected coordinated timing. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 6 along with the previously reported levels Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transport.ation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 10 July 8, 1996 of service for e.,dsting conditions. Table 6 Comparison of Intersection Level of Service CalCulations Existing Conditions Coordinated Conditions Midday Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Midday Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 1. Washington Avenue-Hastings 11.0 B 26.6 D 9.4 B 10.8 B Road/South State Street 2. Talmage Road/South State Street 24.1 C 35.9 D 17.9 C 27.3 D 3. Gobbi Street/South State Street 18.8 C 19.9 C 16.4 C 18.0 C 4. Mill Street/South State Street 6.9 B 7.5 B 7.7 B 9.2 B 5. Perkins Street/State Street 43.7 E 35.7 D 30.5 D 29.9 D 6. Standley Street/State Street 21.6 C 17.2 C 18.1 C 16.5 C 7. Scott Street/North State Street 2.4 A 3.7 A 4.2 A 6.9 B 8. Norton Street/North State Street 3.1 A 2.0 A 5.3 B 1.4 A 9. Low Gap Road-Brash Street/ 19.0 C 14.2 B 8.4 B 7.5 B North State Street 10. Ford Road-Empire Drive/North 23.6 C 25.8 D 13.5 B 16.2 C State Street 11. KUKI Lane/North State Street 11.6 B 14.1 B 11.4 B 13.5 B Notes Delay is in average seconds per vehicle Refer to Appendix A for Level of Service Methodology Descriptions Refer to Appendix B for Level of Service Calculations As shown in Table 6, eight of the intersections have improved operation during both the midday and p.m. peak periods, two intersections have slightly more delay during both study periods, and one intersection improves during the p.m. peak but experiences increased delay during the midday period. All intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better'during both peak periods with the coordinated timing. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. Page 11 City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 Alternatives Analysis Description of Alternatives Evaluated As part of this study, a number of different improvement altematives were considered to help the City determine what improvements might render the most benefit for the fewest dollars. Five alternatives were evaluated, as described below. Alternative # 1 Alternative # 1 evaluates the potential benefits which could be gained by eliminating the existing split-phasing at Talmage Street. The impacts of prohibiting parking and adding a left-turn lane with protected left-mm phasing on southbound South State Street at Talmage Road were evaluated under this alternative. The proposed geomethcs and phasing for this alternative are shown in Figure 2. Alternative #2 Another improvement with potential for improving operation on State Street is the installation of left-turn pockets southbound at both Perkins and Standley Streets and northbound at Perkins Street in order to implement protected leg-mm phasing in lieu of the existing split-phasing. The parking on one or both sides of State Street would need to be eliminated from approximately 200 feet south of Perkins Street to 300 feet north of Standley Street. Figure 3 contains a graphical representation of the proposed geometric and phasing changes for this altemative. Alternative #3 The anticipated impacts-of prohibiting parking and installing left-mm pockets northbound at Scott Street, southbound at Norton Street and both directions at Mill Street were also evaluated. The potential improvements for these additional left-mm pockets with permissive left-mm phasing were evaluated at Alternative #3. The proposed geometrics for these three intersections are shown in Figure 4. Alternative #4 Under this alternative the impacts of eliminating the split phasing at Talmage, Perkins and Standley Streets are evaluated. Alternative #4 includes installation of left-turn pockets and protected left-rum phasing on the southbound approaches to Talmage and Standley Streets and on both approaches to Perkins Street. Figure 5 indicates the proposed changes to geometfics and phasing. Alternative #5 The final alternative evaluated was a combination of Alternatives # 1, #2 and #3 above, so includes installation of left-mm pockets at Scott, Norton, Standley, Perkins, Mill, and Talmage' Streets and implementation of protected left-mm phasing at Standley, Perkins and Talmage Streets. The improvements evaluated under this alternative are shown graphically in Figure 6. Evaluation of Alternatives The purpose of the Alternatives Evaluation was to determine the potential benefits of each proposed improvement as compared to some baseline condition. Since the installation of leg-mm pockets and protected left-turn phasing is already planned for the intersection of North State Street/Low Gap Road-Brash Road, a baseline scenario was Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. Page 12 City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 Not to Scale LEGEND Signalized Study Intersections Em Brush Street Street Figure 2 Alternative #1 -Geometrics and Phasing Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study VVhiflock & Weinberger Transportation Inc. City of Ukiah UKIOOI.DEW 6/96 · , · '. ,.., i.~ , · ,' : i- · ':-.. W Figure 3 Alternative #2 -Geometries and Phasing Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study . ~ Whifloek & Weinberger Transportation Inc. City of Ukiah UKI00 I.DRW 6/96 KUKI I~ ~,,,~ ~ ~~,ow ~  , ! . ~ S~naliz~ ~,  Study Intem~t~ns  Figure 4 Alternative ~3 - Geometrics and Phasing Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study w. ~. ~ .~ Whiflock & Weinberger Transpo~fion Inc. City of Ukiah UKIOOI.DRW 4/9~ (lO1' Brush Street Sb'ee~ Not to Scale LEGEND Signalized Study Intersections Wa__shington Avenue Figure 5 Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitloek & Weinberger Transportation Inc. Alternative #4 - Geometrics and Phasing City of Ukiah UlCIOO I.DRW ~/9~ LEGEND Signalized Study Intemections Brush Street Street __J I Wa__~ington Avenue Road N th Not to $ccte -- Figure ~ Alternative #5 - Geometri~ and Phasin~ Troffic S~nol ¢oor~not~on Foas~bfl~ty Whiflook & Weinberger Transpomfion Ino. City of Ukiah UKIO0 I.DRW 6/96 developed using existing volumes and including this improvement. The baseline conditions results were obtained in a manner similar to that used to develop the coordinated timing; first optimal phasing and a cycle length were obtained using PASSER II-90, then green time splits and measures of effectiveness were obtained through TRANSYT 7-F. A comparison of the travel times and speeds for the baseline conditions and all five alternatives are contained in Table 7. As with the data shown in Table 5, the travel times have been decreased by a factor of 1.25 and the travel speeds have been increased by a factor of 1.25. Table 7 Comparison of Alternatives Direction/Peak Baseline Conditions Alternative #1 Conditions Period Average Average Travel Average Average Travel Travel Time Speed (mph) / Travel Time Speed (mph) / (minutes) Change from (minutes) Change from Baseline (percent) Baseline (percent) Northbound/Midday 7:10 23.3 7:07 23.5 / +0.9 Southbound/Midday 6:42 24.0 6:21 24.6 / +2.5 Northbound/P.M. Peak 8:07 19.4 7:42 20.2 / +4.1 Southbound/P.M. 'Peak 7:20 22.1 5:47 26.6 / +20.4 Alternative #2 Conditions Alternative #3 Conditions Northbound/Midday 6:31 24.6 / +5.6 7:04 23.2 / -0.4 Southbound/Midday 5:44 27.6 / +15.0 6:20 25.0 / +4.2 Northbound/P.M. Peak 7:30 20.6 / +6.2 7:22 21.2 / +9.3 1 Southbound/P.M. Peak 6:58 23.4 / +5.9 7:22 22.1 / 0.0 Alternative #4 Conditions Alternative #5 Conditions Northbound/Midday 6:28 24.8 / +6.4 6:26 24.8 / +6.4 Southbound/Midday 5:22 28.9 / +20.4 5:26 28.6 / + 19.2 Northbound/P.M. Peak 7:13 21.5 / +10.8 7:19 21.2 / +9.3 Southbound/P.M. Peak 5:26 28.1 / +27.1 5:24 28.4 / +28.5 A review of the reformation in Table 7 indicates that with the exception of Alternative #3, some operational improvements can be attained through the various modifications for each direction during both time periods evaluated. Alternative #3 has a slower travel speed in the northbound direction for the midday period and the southbound direction for the p.m. period. The results of the alternatives analysis were further compared with the operational improvements which are anticipated for implementation of coordinated timing. It is projected that travel speeds will increase by an average Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 18 July 8, 1996 of 21.8 percent for the northbound and 25.5 percent for the southbound direction during the midday period through use of coordinated timing. By contrast, the alternatives evaluated are expected to improve midday speeds by a maximum of 6.4 percent for the northbound and 20.4 percent for the southbound. For the p.m. peak period, coordinated timing is expected to have a minimal impact, with speeds actually projected to decrease by 3.1 percent for the southbound direction. Implementation of improvements evaluated could yield improvements of up to a 28.5 percent increase in southbound travel speeds during the p.m. peak hour. Speeds for northbound traffic are projected to increase a maximum of 10.8 percent. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 19 July 8, 1996 Cost/Benefit Analysis Cost of Improvements Planning level cost estimates were developed for each of the alternatives evaluated. The direct costs include items such as new controllers, interconnect conduit and cable, new detector loops, new signal heads and striping. Additionally, all five of the alternatives evaluated include the indirect cost of the loss of parking in order to install left-turn pockets. This indirect cost is difficult to estimate, and varies substantially from one location to the next. Field reviews indicate that the loss of parking in order to install lefi-tum pockets at Talmage Road, Scott Street, Norton Street and Mill Street may cause little inconvenience, and may therefore have a low indirect cost associated with it. Loss of parking in the vicinity of Perkins and Standley Streets, however, would likely be perceived as creating substantial inconvenience. An informal survey of parking conditions in downtown Ukiah indicates that adequate parking is available within one block to serve all of the vehicles which would be displaced by a parking prohibition. The installation of left-turn pockets at Perkins and Standley Street could be accomplished at a lower indirect cost if the City opted to use reduced lane widths (1 l-foot inside lanes and a 12-foot curb lane) and maintain an 8-foot parking lane on one side of the street. The estimated direct costs for the various improvements evaluated are as follows, with all costs in thousands of dollars. The basis of these cost projections is contained in Appendix C. Installation of interconnect and coordinated timing Left-mm pocket and left-turn phasing at Talmage Road Left-turn pockets and protected phasing at Perkins and Standley Streets Left-mm pockets at Mill, Scott and Norton Streets $330,000 $13,000 $24,000 $31,000 Cost/Benefit Results The ratio of the cost of improvements to the benefit provided was determined for each improvement evaluated. For each alternative the average change in travel speed for the corridor was calculated using the change for both directions during both time periods. This benefit of increase speed was then divided into the cost of improvements to determine the cost per mile per hour of travel speed gained. The results of this analysis are contained in Table 8. Table 8 Cost/Benefit Comparison Improvement Scenario Cost (in 1000s) Average Increase in Cost/Benefit Travel Speeds (mph) (in 1000s) Interconnect and Coordination $330 2.55 $129.4/mph Alternative # 1 $13 1.52 $8.6/mph Alternative #2 $24 1.85 $13.0/mph Alternative #3 $31 0.68 $45.6/mph Alternative #4 $37 3.62 $10.'2/mph Alternative #5 $68 3.55 $19.2/mph Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. Page 20 City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 As can be seen in Table 8, the incremental cost for installing hardwire interconnect and implementing coordinated signal timing is significantly higher than for any of the geometric improvement alternatives. The alternative which is projected to net the highest increase in average travel speeds is Alternative//4, the installation of lett-tum pockets and protected lett-turn phasing at Talmage Road, Perkins Street and Standley Street. The alternative with the lowest cost/benefit ratio is Alternative//1, installation of a left-turn pocket and protected lett-turn phasing southbound at Talmage Road. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 21 July 8, 1996 Recommendations There are a number of different approaches which can be taken to improve operation along State Street through the City of Ukiah. The improvements which are chosen from the menu contained in this report will depend on a number of issues, including available funding, projected benefits and political viability. Based on the analysis and evaluation performed, the following recommendations were developed. Although improvements are planned for the intersection at Low Gap Road-Brush Street, as an interim measure it may be desirable to connect up the existing detector loops so that actuated operation can be attained in lieu of the existing fixed time mode if the City does not anticipate completing the improvements in the near future. Installation ofhardwire interconnect is not recommended due to the high cost. As an altemative, the City may wish to consider using time-based coordination at a cost of approximately $45,000 for new controllers and timing implementation. The cost/benefit ratio for a time-based alternative is $17.6/mph (cost in thousands). The one aspect of existing operation which contributes the most to delay, low operating speeds, and driver frustration along State Street is the split-phase operation at Talmage Road, Perkins Street and Standley Street. Through elimination of some on-street parking and installation of lefMum pockets and protected left-turn phasing, considerable improvements can be attained. It is recommended that the City implement Alternative #4 as this alternative nets the highest gain in average travel speeds and has the second lowest cost/benefit ratio. It is recommended that the City of Ukiah adopt a standard traffic signal controller for installation either during construction of new traffic signals or to replace broken or old equipment. Although no benefits associated with this recommendation were evaluated, use of standard equipment reduces down time when a controller is knocked down or breaks because it is less difficult to keep a single type of spare controller in stock (as opposed to the three different types currently in use) and maintenance personnel can work more quickly with a familiar piece of equipment. Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah Page 22 July 8, 1996 Study Participants and References Study Participants Project Manager: Project Engineer: Project Planner:' Dalene J. Whitlock, P.E. Andrew Wong Cheryl Griffin References Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994 Traffic Manual, Calfforma Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual, California Department of Transportation Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Wemberger Transportation, Inc. Page 23 City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 Appendix A Description of Intersection Capacity Analysis Methodologies Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Wemberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 DESCRIPTION OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 1985 HCM OPERATIONS METHOD Backgi'ound The operations method of intersection capacity analysis found in Chapter 9, "Signalized Intersections," of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985, was used for this study. This method is used in most analyses of existing conditions or of future situations in which traffic, geometric, and control parameters were well established by projections and trial designs. This method addresses the capacity and level of service of intersection approaches, and the level of service of the intersection as a whole. In this method, capacity and level of service are evaluated separately, and are not related to each other in a simple one-to-one fashion. Capacity is evaluated in terms of the ratio of demand flow rate to capacity (volume-to-capacity ratio), while level of service is evaluated on the basis of average stopped delay per vehicle (sec/veh). The capacity of the intersection as a whole is not addressed by this method; the design and signalization of intersections focuses on the accommodation of the major movements and approaches comprising the intersection. Capacity is, therefore, only meaningfid as applied to these major movements and approaches. Capacity analysis results in the Computation of volume-to-capacity ratios for individual movements and a composite volume-to-capacity ratio for the sum of critical movements or lane groups within the intersection. The volume-to-capacity ratio is the actual or projected rate of flow on an approach or designated group of lanes during a peak 15-minute interval divided by the capacity of the approach or designated group of lanes. Level of Service Level of Service is based on the average stopped delay per vehicle for various movements within the intersection. While volume-to-capacity affects delay, there are other parameters that more strongly affect it, such as the quality of progression, length of green phases, cycle lengths, and others. Thus for any given volume-m-capacity ratio, a range of delay values may result, and vice-versa. See the table "Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections" for the relationship between the level of service and stopped delay per vehicle. Because delay is a complex measure, its relationship to capacity is also complex. It is possible, for example, to have delays in the range of Level of Service F while the volume-to-capacity ratios is below 1.00, perhaps as low as 0.75-0.85. Very high delays can occur at such volume-to-capacity ratios when some combination of the following conditions exists: the cycle length is long; the lane group in question has a long red time; and/or the signal progression for the subject movement is poor. The reverse is also possible. A saturated approach or lane group with a volume-to-capacity equal to 1.00 may have low delays if the cycle length is short, and/or the signal progression is favorable for the subject movement. Acceptable delays levels do not automatically ensure that capacity is sufficient. The analysis must consider the results of the capacity analysis module and the level of service module to obtain a complete picture of existing or projected intersection operations. Thus, the designation of Level of Service F does not automatically imply that the intersection, approach, or lane group is overloaded, nor does a level of service in the A to E range automatically imply that there is unused capacity available. The procedures of this methodlogy require the analysis of both cccapacity and level of service conditions to fully evaluate the operation of a signalized intersection. Input Data The input data necessary to use this methodology are: · lane geometrics · traffic volumes · signal timing · vehicle type distribution · percent grade · pedestrians · peak hour factors · parking activity · arrival type per approach LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay (seconds/vehicle) A <5.0 B >5.0 and < 15.0 C >15.0 and <25.0 D >25.0 and <40.0 E >40.0 and <60.0 F >60.0 Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985. DESCRIPTION OF LANE CONFIGURATION FORMAT The number of lanes and the use of the lanes is denoted with a special nomenclature described below: Lane Nomenclature X.Y Where X Denotes the total number of lanes available for a particular movement. Y Denotes how the lanes are used. When Y is ...... The following applies:. I' ! ~ !.0 R 0 ~-. ,.o T A lane used exclusively for a particular movement (i.e. exclusive left-turn lane) ~ 1.o L I: A lane which is shared, that is, either of two different movements can be made 1 ~ 2.~'" TR from a particular lane (i.e. a lane which is shared by through and right-turn ]" .f 1.0 L traf~c). n~- '.' R Denotes two or more through 'lanes in which two lanes are shared, one with 2 .... 2.2 T · ~. ,., L left-mm traffic, the other with right-mm traffic. I' ! · 3 Denotes an expressway through movement. ! · k_ ,.4 ~ Denotes a right-mm movement from a wide outside lane where right-turn 4 ~/~-'- -- 2.1 T t-- ,.0 L vehicles Can bypass through traffic sharing the lane to make a right-turn on red. I: I: K_. i.5 R 5 --~-- 2.0 T Denotes a right-turn movement from an exclusive right-turn lane with a ~-- ~.o L right-mm arrow and prohibition on the conHicting U-tum movement. I' ! ~ ~.6 ~ Denotes a fight-turn movement from a shared lane with a right-turn arrow and ..... 3.1 T ~'-r-- ,.o ,. prohibition on the conflicimg U-turn movement. ! Denotes a turning movement which has a separate lane to turn into, as shown 7,8,9 below: It:t:t_ · ~- 1.7 R Turn lane which is shared with a through lane or left-mm lane and under signal 7 -:~- 2., T control, and which has its own lane to turn into. There must be at least two I~:~ r ,-- ,.o ,~through lanes. · , I~:~ :~ ~ ~.s ~ Exclusive turn lane which is under signal control, and which has its own lane 8 - 2~'- - 2.0 T ~ ,.o ~_ to turn into. It"tr It: tl~ - ,.,~ Exclusive turn 'lane not under signal control and which has an exclusive lane to 9 ~-2.o r turn into, often referred to as a "free" mm. Since the volumes in this lane do not~ ,.o L conflict with other intersection movements, the V/C ratio of the free right-turn I t:t. I movement is not included in the sum of critical V/C ratios. Appendix B Intersection Level of Service Calculations Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Wemberger Transportation, Inc. City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 ~ Softwax~ Lioensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~3er 7~-ans. Inc. by TJKM =================: :======== Cka~ditio~: Mick~ay Pmak Hour: E~/sti~ T~fic Volumes 05/31/96 =============: =================__== INTERSEC%~/ON 1 South State St./Washi~/Hast. City of Ukiah Coquet D~te 5/29/96 ~ 12:00-1:00 PM Peak ~our 12:00-1:00 PM ........................................................................ 85 H(~ O~er~ti~ 114 472 19 64-SEC CYCL~ ^ ^ PHASE GRN Y+R IX)ST .................. f <--- v ---> I 1 NS-L 8 4 0.0 116 ---' 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 19 2 NS-~ 24 4 0.0 3 EW-LTR 20 4 0.0 28 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 28 35 --- 1.1 1.0 1~1 1.1 1.1 --- 29 N W + E 3t ~47 34 S .............. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .... RTOR f~PL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS%HVY ARR PEAK HOUR SAT ......................................................................... 12345678 LT TH RT LEFT THRU'RG~'~ NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 =================================== ====~==== LANE Wn~H ADJ SAT ORDER GROUP ~ODELAY GRO~ (~T.) %K)L VOL FL~ V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C D~Yo a LOS T 12.0 477 2 B R 12.0 34 2 ~ 12.0 511 511 1495 0.342 2 0.438 654 0.781' 13.5 B ........................................................................ + SB L 12.0 19 19 1434 0.013 1 0.188 269 0.071 16.3C 8.7 T 12.0 472 2 B R 12.0 114 2 ~ 12.0 586 615 2931 0.210 2 0.438 1282 0.480 8.5 B T 12.0 28 3 B R 12.0 35 3 L~ 12.0 179 179 881 0.203 3 0.375 330 0.542* 11.3B ~-£-'-H:J-q~ ......................................................... 3 8.9 T 12.0 28 3 B R 12.0 19 3 Lq 12.0 76 76 911 0.083 3 0.375 342 0.222 8.9 B :============= *=(~ql~U/CAL ~ GROUP D~JtY= 11.0 SEC/VEH V/C =0.57 =======~? ................. _-====~.~ .................____ LOS Softwar~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinber~er Trans. Inc. by TJKM ============================================== ......... Ckmditicm: Mi~ay Peak ~: ~xist/ng Traffic ~gi~ .................... 05/31/96 ========================================================================= ~._I~ ~_~C~_O~N ..... 2. South State_. St./Talmage Pz~ad City of ~kiah ~u~u ~ :/z-/~ '~me F;~ (10%] Peak }~D%lr 12:00-1:00 PM ........................................................................ 85 Hf~ Operatic~s ACT~ATED,~-f]~D 0 397 257 79-SEC CY(ILE I ! I PHASE GRN y+R LOST --- ____ 0 __i 0.0 0.0 2.vi i.i> i.oI--- 278 2 S-~.T 24 4 0.0 3 W-LR 20 3 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 --- 0 I 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 --- 260 < ...... >v] W+E 40 98 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RTOR C~ PED W/ MIN P~K % BUS%HVY APR PEAK HOUR SAT ......................................................................... 12345678 LT TH RT LEFT THRU RG~'r NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 S~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ======================== ~-~ ~ ~}~SE ============================== ~L~oU WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER LANE L GROUPO t DELAY UP (FT.) VOL VOL FIXYW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPA~ V/C DELAY Si& LOS ........................................................................ NB T 12.0 450 i i 14 . 9 R 12.0 198 SB L 12.0 257 2 ....................... + ..... T 12.0 397 2 I 14'~ LT 12.0 654 687 2961 0.232 2 0.354 1049 0.654* 14.7 B ~-£---H:j-~_~--~_~j~;~%7~---~ ..................................... R 12.0 278 278 937 0.297 3 0.291 273 1.019' 58. ========================================================================= *=C~/'~ICAL ~ GRfN3P D~Y= 24.1 SEC/~WEH V/C =0.76 LOS=C ========================================================================= LOS Softwax~ Licensed to Whitlock & We/nk~x~er Tk-~ns. Inc. by .......... ===========: ..... Condition: Midday Peak ~our: Existin~ Traffic Volumes 05/31/96 ........ :===========~ INTERSECTION 3 South State St.~ Stx~et . City of Ukiah Count Date 5/21/96 ~ (4%) Peak }Rmlr 12:00-1:00 PM ........................................................................ 85 H(i~! O~eratio~s PHASE GRN Y+R LOST <--- v ---> I i-~--£ .... 56 --- 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.01.1 --- 84 2 NS-~ 24 4 0.0 3 EW-L B 4 0.0 187 ---> 1.1 (NO.OF lJ~) 1.1<--- 174 4 W-LTR 12 0 0.0 5 EW-TR 20 4 0.0 --- 62 { 1.1 1.0 2~1 1.1 1.0 --- 199 W+ E 6 41 28 S ================================================ RTOR CNFL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS%HVY ARR PEAK HOUR SAT APP ~ ~ PHASE ~ II~ GRA ST~ VEH TYP FAC'IDR FLOW 12345678 LT TH RT LEF~ THRU RG~T NB 0 0 0 N 0 . 0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1319 ........... ============================================================== LANE ADJ P~ASE LANE L APR(~ LANE WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER GROUP 0 DELAY GROUP (FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C DELAY S a LOS D 19.1 T 12.0 491 2 C R 12.0 128 2 ~ 12.0 619 650 2926 0.222 2 0.318 931 0.698* 18.4 C ~'£---~%---~-'-~-~;~;-~;~Ji ...................................... 0.136 196 0.476* 28.1 D 18.2 T 12.0 460 2 C R 12.0 25 2 ~ 12.0 485 509 2996 0.170 2 0.318 953 0.534 16.3 C ~'£---H%--'~---~j~;~;-~.'~---~ ...... ~.-i~--i~--~--~_~-G+-~_~ T 12.0 187 5 C R 12.0 62 5 TR 12.0 249 249 1453 0.171 5 0.273 396 0.628* 20.0 C T 12.0 174 45 C R 12.0 84 45 ~ 12.0 258 258 1242 0.208 45 0.409 508 0.508 13.1 B ========================================================================= *:CRi~UICAL LANE GROUP D~Y: 18 .B SEC/VEH V/C :0.62 LOS=C ========================================================================= LOS Software Licensed to Whitlock & We/nbex~sr Trans. Inc. by TJKM ======================================================================== (ka~ditica%: Midday Peak }~Dur: E~stin~ TXaffic Volumes 05/31/96 ======================================================================== INTERSECTION 4 South State St./Mill Street City of Ukiah Count Date 5/21/96 Time FAL~ (4%) Peak }k~/r 12:00-1:00 PM 85 HCl~l Operations ACTt~uTED,NON-CBD ^ PHASE ~ Y+R LOST I <--- ,,---> i-~6:£~ 24--;-;7; 53 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 21 2 EW-LTR 24 4 0.0 96 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LA~) 1.1<--- 112 --- 84 { 1.1 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 12 N v 4 ~ {{12 v W+E 4 54 S ========================================================================= R"IDRC~qFL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS %HVY ;%RR P~ HOUR SAT APP VP~ PEDS PHASE GRN ING G~.A STP VEH TYP FACTOR FLOW 12345678 LT TH RT LEFT THRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 WB 0 0 0 N 0 · 00 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 ================================= ............ u~ wn~m ~ SAT ~ER GR~ 01~ ~o_~ (FT.) vo,. VO,. m~ v/s 1234s678 o/c c~ v/c DsU~¥ s{~. nos NB L 12.0 44 1 R 12.0 12 1 f LTR 12.0 650 682 2111 0.323 1 0.500 1056 0.647* 7.5 BI ~-£---j_7S---~ ................. ~ ................................. , ..... R 12.0 60 1 LTR 12.0 600 630 2222 0.284 1 0.500 1111 0.567 6.8 B ................................... + - .................................... EB L 12.0 53 2 6.B5 T 12.0 96 2 R 12.0 84 2 B LTR 12.0 233 233 954 0.244 2 0.500 477 0.488* 6.5 ~&-£---i~-:;---H .................. ~ ................................ T 12.0 112 2 R 12.0 21 2 B LTR 12.0 145 145 999 0.145 2 0.500 500 0.290 5.4 B ============================ ...................... ~-~oo u=. ~, ~m~oo ~T~i~TT~C_-TTT~E~T~ ...................... LOS Soft~ Li~sed to whitlock & Weinbez~er T~. Inc. by TJKM Gc~ditic~: Midday Peak ~our: Existing Traffic Volua~s 05/31/96 INTERSECTIO~ 5 South State_. St. _/_P~rkins Street City of Oount Date 5/29/96 '~n~ 12:00-1:00 P~ peak Ho~lr 12:00-1:00 85 HCa4 Operation, s AC~TED, C~D 6? 4,96 242 BO-SEC CY~ i I ; ^ PHASE GRN Y+R LOST ___ 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.0 --- 108 2 S-LTR 25 30.0 3 W-LTR 21 3 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO, OF LANF__~) 1.1<--- 226 _._ 0 I 0.0 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 106 W+E 7 34 S ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.001.001.00 n67 s~ 0 0 0 ~ 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 z.o01.00 1267 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 I.~ ~ jndDJ~ ~ (3[~ DEIAY (mcr~ (Dr.) SOL VOL D'~ V/S 12345678 G/c C.~AC V/C DEIAY S & ............................................. ~&-£-'-~3'-'~; ........... i 17.8 T 12.0 384 1 C R 12.0 104 LTR 12.0 560 5BB 2181 0.270 1 0.350 763 0.770* 17.B ~G-£---~[Z--S2; ......................................................... T 12 0 4~6 2 63.5 · 2 F R 12.0 60 2 LTR 12.0 7~B B3B 2199 0.381 2 0.350 770 1.089~ 63.5 F 4&-£---~--i~ ................... S ..................................... T 12.0 226 3 40.9 ~ 12.0 108 108 960 0.113 3 0.300 288 oO.375 14.6~ E LT 12.0 '332 332 1111 0.29~ 3 0.300 333 .996' 49.4 · =CRITICAL LANE GROUP EELAY= 43.7 SEC/VEH V/C =0.95 LOS=E ============================== ................... m~--u~oo =x. m~, vo~u~o o =x. C~V&l ~ U %S~ ...................... LOS Softw~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbez~3er Tk~ms. Inc. by TJ~M os/3s/~s ======================================================= ~~ 6 ~ State St./St~ey St~C~of ~ ............................................. 85 H~ ~ti~s .......................... 124 --i 1.1 0.0 2.1 1.1 0.0 --- 0 2 S-BT 25 3 0.0. 3 E-L~ 21 3 0.0 156 ---> 1.~ (~. OF ~) 0.0<--- 0 -._ 138 { 1.0 0.0 211 1.1 0.0 --- 0 W+ E 2 2 ======================================================================== ............................................................ ~345678 LT ~ ~ ~ ~U ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1Si~ SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 12( ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 12( ================================= ======================================== ~ ~ ~ W~ ~ ~ ~ ~O~ O ~ ~y ~ T 12.0 222 ................................ + ...... 1 R ~.0 260 1 ~ 14. ~ 12.0 %82 506 2498 0.203 1 ................................... 0.350 87~ 0.579* 14.3 B~ T 12.0 323 323 1~9 0 286 2 0'350 395 i'i~I t~'~ ~ ~-~ ............... · · u.~z~ 22.7 C[ D m ~ ~.o ~ ................... S .............. , ................ + ..... R ~.0 BB BB 960 0.144 3 0.300 2BB 0.479 15.6 LT 12.0 280 280 1104 0.2~ 3 0.300 331 0.845' 27.5 ..... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: · :~ ~ ~O~ D~Y= 21.G ~C/~ V/C =0.77 ~C ============================== ................ ~oo~. ~, ~oo ~. ~7~TTT~T~ ...................... LOS Software License~ to Whitlock & Weinbercjer Trans. Inc. by TJKM =========================================== =========== __O~__c~_'t~c~: Micklay Peak Dk~r: Exist/ng ~affic Volumes 05/31/96 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: __ INACTION 7 North State St./Scott Street City of 0kiah Count Date 5/21/96 85 HCM Ope~tiorm .................................... 27 614 0 50-SEC CYCLE <--- ~ ---> I ~-~-£~-- 32-'2 o.o 84 .-! 1.1 1.1 2.1 0.0 0.0--- 0 S-TR 2 E-LR 10 4 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF ~) 0.0<--- 0 28 --- 1.1 1.1 2 0.0 0 0 0 { <--- A1 . --- N W+E 3 55 0 S ....... __= RTOR ~ ~ W/ -~L~-~I~---~--~5~--=;~.I~='' ARR ~ HOUR SAT ~34567~ .................. £%-~&-~ ..... ~-~-~&~-~&~4 ...... NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 '3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ....... :::::::::::::::::::::::::: ========= I.~ WiD'~ ADO' SAT O~ GR(YJP 0 D~AY GROUP (FT.) '4DL '~0L FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAP~ V/C DELAY S & LOS ~&-£---~ ............................................................... .0 34 1 + T 12.0 545 1 I 1.7 ..................... SBT 12.0 614 1 T~ 12.0 641 673 3000 0.224 1 0.720 2160 0.312 1.7 A ................................. + ...................... T 12.0 0 B 10.2 R 12.0 28 2 B LTR 12.0 112 112 920 0.122 2 0.280 258 0.435* 10.2 ========================================================================= *=CRITICAL LANE GROUP DELAY= 2.4 SEC/VEH V/C =0.37 LOS=A =========================== ................. ~r=u~o o ~x. ~, von=ur, zo o i~7~r~l~ 777F_~?:~--. ~ ...................... LOS Softwa~ Li~d to Whitlock & Weinbez~er TY~s. Inc. by TJKM ============================================== .............. Go~ditsm: Midday Peak Hour: Existing Traffic 9~ ................... o5/~1/9~ ===================================== ...................... ~.~5~.~ ~.~c~_~ ..... .~ No=h st~_.s~./_~-.~.~ ..... ~78~=~ ...... . __-r~__._--_~_~_,_~__~,__~_~ ........... I~_~_FACrGR ~4~) ~ ~ 12:oo-1:oo 85 HCI~I Operatic~ ...................................... 0 636 67 SO-SEC CYCLE <--- " --- I i-~:,.2&-- -:;~ --,2 %.-8 0 --! 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.1> 1.0 --- 153 S-LT 2 W-LR 10 4 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF I~2~S) 0.0<--- 0 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 --- 44 W+E 5 8 51 S ========================================================================= ........................... 7kC'IDR PT. DW 12345678 .............................................. LT ~7{ RT LEFT 7~RU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 '3 1.00 1.00 1.00 152~ SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ========================================================================= LANE ADJ P~ASE ~ w~ ~ SAT o~E~ ~ ~__?L__v,?t__v?t_9~___ v/~ 12'345678 ,~/c ~.,~ v/c ~ NB T 12.0 578 ...... ~ ................................. 4 ...... R 12.0 51 ~ t 1.6 ~ 12.0 629 660 2983 0.221 i 0.720 2148 0.308 1.6 A 4£-£---J.~8---~ ................. ~ ................................. + ..... T 12.0 636 1 2.0 ___LT 12.0 703 738 2333 0.316 1 0.720 1680 0.439* 2 0 A A w~ ?-;.; ~8-'-;,;,---2,;-;.8;,~- 8 ~ j,;--~ ....... .... L=:~L.o:=~L:~L:~X:__o__.~3 2 0.280 262 ,~:~. ~:~ ~1 ================= ............... *=CR~o~ u~ GR~ ~Y= 3.1 SE~?~---~?~-;372~:::~: ========================================================================= INT=UDLI001EX. INT, VOL=UKI001EX. ~HV, CAP=-... LOSCA~ .TAB LOS Softw~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbez~3er T~arm. Inc. by TJKM ================================================ ............... Condition: Midday Peak }ka~r: Existing Traffic Vo~ ................... 05/31/96 ======================================================================== INTERSECTION 9 North State St./Low Gap Road . City of Ukiah Count Date 5/29/96 ~ 12:00-1:00 PM Peak Hour 12:00-1:00 PM 85 HC~ Operati~ ........................ 64 710 139 69-SE0 C~CLE ^ I A PHASE GRN Y+R LOST <--- v --- 11f --- 1.0 3..1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 65 2 EW-L~ 25 6 0.0 63 ---> 1.1 (I',]D. OF ~) 1.1<--- 60 --_ 118 { 1.1 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 23 W + E 8~ 7 4 30 S ========================================================================== ................................... ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 ====================================== ~ ~ =================================== LA~E wnn~ ADJ SAT ORDER GROU~ OIDELAY GROUP (FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C DELAY S~& LOS ........................................................................ ~ L 12.0 89 1 28.0 T 12.0 794 1 D R 12.0 30 1 L~ 12.0 913 959 1789 0.536 1 0.551 985 0.973* 28.0 D -~-£---~:~--q4 ................. i ........................................ T 12.0 700 1 14.0 R 12.0 64 1 B L~ 12.0 803 843 1841 0.458 1 0.551 1014 0.832 14.0 B T 12.0 63 2 B R 12.0 118 2 ~ 12.0 181 181 1362 0.133 2 0.449 612 0.296 9.3 B ................................................... ~ .................... WB L 12.0 23 2 9.9 T 12.0 60 2 R 12.0 65 2 B L~ 12.0 148 148 880 0.168 2 0,449 395 0.374* 9.9 B ==================================== :::::::::::::::::::::: *=(]~/TICAL L~ GROUP DELAY= 19.0 SEC/VEH V/C =0.70 LOS=C ================================ .................. ~=~o o~. ~, ~oo~. ~J~--777~7~ ...................... LOS Software Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~3er Trans. Inc. by TJ~M =============================================== ............ o5/31/9~ ========================================================== INTERSECTION 10 North State St./Empi~/Ford . City of ~kiah Count Date 5/21/96 ~£-~-~&~&~ ....................................................... 6 9 63 104-SEC CYCLE ^ ^ PHASE ~ Y+R LOST .................. <--- v ---> I 1 NS-L 20 3 0.0 155 - I 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 59 2 ~IS-~ 32 3 0.0 ._ 3 EW-L 20 3 0.0 43 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF I2~) 1.1<--- 48 4 EW-~ 20 3 0.0 ___ 28 I 1.1 1.0 2~1 1.1 1.0 --- 122 N v W+E 5 57 36 S ========================================================================= ......................... 12345678 LT ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 S~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 k~R 0 0 0 N 0 . 0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1 00 1.00 1113 ============================= · ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: u~P {FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC "~ ..... ?IDELA¥ ..................................... , ~ v/,~ ~ SI& LOS ~ L_ 12.0 50 50 1434 0.035 i ..... ~-~_~i--~;~--i-:~:--~:':--+, ..... T 12.0 597 2 · ~- u.~, Z~.9 Ct 22.~ R 12.0 136 2 ~ 12.0 733 770 2935 0.262 2 0.337 988 0.779* 22.4 C! T 12.0 649 2 C! C R 12.0 63 2 ~ 12.0 712 748 2979 0.251 2 0.337 1003 0.746 21.6 ~-£---H:&--~--~ T 12.0 43 ' a ' - . DI 29 6 ~ 12.0 28 ~ 12.0 71 71 1037 0.068 4 0.221 229 0.310 22.1 C! T ~.0 48 ~ 12.0 107 107 1011 0.106 4 0.221 224 0.479* 23.9 CJ · =~ ~ ~ ~Y= 23.6 SEC/~ V/C =0.56 ~=C =================================== .............. ~oo~. ~, ~oo~.~, ~777~7~ ....................... LOS Software Licensed to Whitlock & We/n~ex~er Trans. Inc. by TJKM (ka~ditic~: =========================================================== Midday Peak ~k~ur: Existing ~raffic Volumes 05/31/96 ========================================================================= I/4TERSECI~ON 11 North State St./KUKI Lane City of Ukiah ................ Time FACTOR (104) Peak }k~u~ 12:00-1:00 PM 85 H(~ Operatio~ ....................................................... 89728 89 73-SEC CYCLE 123 I 1.1%.-6 2.~o '--> I ~.-~i£---H-2 --- 1.0 1.1 --- 74 2 NS-~ 32 4 0.0 3 EW-L~ 18 4 0.0 8 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF I~) 1.1<--- 12 80 --- 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.1 1.1 --- 28 W+E 8 76 9 S ========================================================================== ...... - ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1,00 1.00 1.00 1084 ..... ~ w~ ~ SA~ ~ER GRoUP 0 ~__~___~:)___~_L__VOL ~ v/s 12345678 ~/c ~= v/c D~Y ~ ~ L 12.0 83 -~;-i;;j6:;~;-~ ...................................... T 12.0 776 2 0.205 295 0.282 18.7 C 9.6 R 12.0 9 2 B ~R 12.0 785 824 3014 0.273 2 0.493 1486 0.555* 8.6 B 'r .1_~.0728 764 3020 0.253 2 0'493 1489 0'51~ -~'{ ~] ~'~ ~ 12.0 89 89 1283 0.069 2 0'493 633 0'1~ ~'~ ~1 .......................................... · ........ EB L 12.0 123 ~ ......................... + ..... T 12.0 8 ~ 29.0 R 12.0 80 3 D L~ 12.0 211 211 824 0.256 3 0.301 248 0.850* 29.0 D ...................... ..................... ............................. WB L 12.0 28 3 + 13.9 T 12.0 12 3 B R 12.0 74 3 LTR 12.0 114 114 869 0.131 3 0.301 262 0.435 13 9 B ================================= · ======================================== · =CRi"FICAL LANE GROUP DEI2~Y= 11.6 SEC/VEH V/C =0.59 LOS=B ================================ ................. ~=~oo~. ~, VOodoos. W&i~77755~i~7~/~ ...................... LOS Softw~x~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~3er Trans. Inc. by TJKM oo~ditic~%: P.M. P~ak ~o~r: Ex/stix~ Traffic Vol~$ 05/31/96 ~t ~ ~ %:30-5:30 ~ ~ ~ 4:30-5:30 ~ ........................................................................ 85 H~ ~ti~s ~,~N-~ 142 789 19 ~-~C ~ ~ ~ ~ Y+R ~ , <--- v ---> ~ 1 ~-L 8 4 0.0 124 -- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 18 2 ~-~ 24 4 0.0 3 ~-L~ 20 4 0.0 7 ---> 1.1 (~. OF ~) 1.1<--- 12 49 --- 1.1 1.0 l&l 1.1 1.1 --- 30 W+E 3 G B 15 S R~I)R ~ PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS %HVY ARR PEAK HOUR APP VP~ PEDS P~h%SE GRN ~ GRA STP VEH ~ FACTOR FLOW ......................................................................... 12345678 LT ~{ RT LEFT ~RU RG~T NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 ========================================================================= LANE ADJ PHASE LANE L LANE WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER GROUP 0 DELA~ GROUP (FT.) ~DL %TIL FI/)W V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C D~Y S & LOS T 12.0 688 2 R 12.0 15 2 | TR 12.0 703 703 1505 0.467 2 0.438 658 1.068' 52.9 E! ................................................................... + ..... SB L 12.0 19 19 1434 0.0131 0.188 269 0.071 16.3C 11.5 T 12.0 789 2 B R 12.0 142 2 TR 12.0 931 978 2950 0.3312 0.438 1291 0.757 11.4B ~-£'--i~;--~& ......................................................... 3 11.4 T 12.0 7 3 B R 12.0 49 3 Lq 12.0 180 180 879 0.205 3 0.375 330 0.546* 11.4 B ~-£---HT;--q; ......................................................... 3 8.7 T 12.0 12 3 B R 12.0 18 3 LTR 12.0 60 60 884 0.068 3 0.375 331 0.181 8.7 B *=CR_TTICAL LANE GROOP DELAY= 26.6 SEC/VEH V/C =0.70 LOS=D LOS Softwax~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinberger Trans. Inc. by TJKM ======================================================================== Condition: P.M. Peak ~D%ur: E~/sting T~affic Volu~ss 05/31/96 Count Date ~ime 4:30-5:30 PM Peak ........................................................................ 85 HfS4 Operations 0 461 294 79-SEC C~CL~ ........ <--- 0 ---~ 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.1> 1.0 --- 317 2 S-LT 24 4 0.0 3 W-~/~ 20 3 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (HO. OF LA/~S) 0.0<--- 0 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2~1 1.1 1.0 --- 293 N W+E ~ 52 48 S .... ~6~ .--.-..--..-.---,--..---..---.---.-.. ...... ~% 12345678 LT TH RT LEFT ~RU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ========================================================================= LANE ADJ PH~E I2~NE L I AI~RCH I2tNE WII;~H ADJ SAT ORDER GROUP 0 DELAY GROUP (~.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C D~AYS & LOS NB T 12.0 552 1 18.3 R 12.0 248 1 TR 12.0 800 840 2879 0.292 1 0.354 1020 0.823* 18.3 C SB L 12.0 294 2 16.4 T 12.0 461 2 LT 12.0 755 793 2962 0.268 2 0.354 1050 0.755* 16.4 C WB T. 12.0 293 293 1047 0.280 3 0.291 305 0.961 51.2 E 83.1 R 12.0 317 317 937 0.338 3 0 .291 273 1.162'112.6 *=CRi"FICAL ~ GROUP DEI~kY= 35.9 SEC/V~ V/C =0.90 LOS=D ..................................... ==================================== LOS Softwax~ Licensed to Whitlock & Wei~rger ~-ans. Inc. by TJKM Oo~ditio~: P.M. Peak ~ka~r: EM/sting T~fic Vol%u~es 05/31/96 ...................... INTERSECTION 3 South State St./C~i Street City of Ukiah cxm/nt Date Tim~ 4:30-5:30 PM Peak Ho~r 4:30-5:30 PM ~.~-¢,~-6~2.,;,~ ................................. kr.,K&.~:6;'~¢,:~ ...... ^ PHASE ~RN Y+R LOST i <--- ,, .... I .i-~:£ .... i --2 52 --- 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 92 2 NS-T'R 24 4 0.0 3 EW-L 8 4 0.0 177 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LAI',,~S) 1.1<--- 184 4 W-L'TR 12 0 0.0 5 EW-TR 2O 4 0.0 61 --- 1.1 1.0 2~,1 1.1 1.0 --- 207 I ........ I N W+E 7 56 52 S R~DR C~qFL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS %HVY ~ PEAK HOUR SAT APP VPH PEDS PHASE G~N ING GRA STP VEH TYP FACTOR FLOW ......................................................................... 12345678 LT ~ ~ ~ ~U R~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1319 ~ W~ ~ ~T ~ ~0~ 0 D~Y ~O~ (~.) ~L ~L ~ V/S 12345678 G/C ~ V/C D~Y S & ~ I~3 L 12.0 72 72 1434 0.050 1 0.136 196 0.368 26.8 D 21.9 T 12.0 576 2 C C R 12.0 152 2 TR 12.0 728 764 2925 0.261 2 0.318 931 0.821' 21.5 T 12.0 488 2 I C R 12.0 24 2 | ~ 12.0 512 538 2998 0.179 2 0.318 954 0.564 16.6 C{ ,~-¢.---~Y;---~;.'--~Yi;,~;-;,7~ J--~ ...... ;,Ti:;J T 12.0 177 5 | C R 12.0 61 5 ~ 12.0 238 238 1452 0.164 5 0.273 396 0.601' .19.5 C LOS Softw-~re Lioensed to Whitlock & Weinbexger TYans. Inc. by TJKM Condition: P.M. Peak ~our: Existing Traffic Volumss 05/31/96 INTERSECTTON 4 South State St./Mill Street City of Ukiah Cou~t Date 5/21/96 Time 4:30-5:30 PM Peak }~ 4:30-5:30 PM ........................................................................ 85 H(~4 Operations ACT%IkTED,NON-~D ^ ^ PHASE GRN Y+R LOST { <--- ',, .... { i'~:£~ -~;, --2 -;,:;, 57 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 22 2 EW-LTR 24 4 0.0 103 ---> 1.1 (HO. OF I~) 1.1<--- 121 91 --- 1.1 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 13 N W+ E 4~ ~ 62 13 S ~ CNF5 ~D W/ MI}{ ~ % BUS%HVY ARR PF~AK FK)UR ~AT ......................................................................... 12345678 LT ~ ~ ~ ~U R~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 ====~=~~ .................................................. ~ W~ ~ ~T O~ ~0~ O D~Y ~O~ (~.) ~L ~L ~ V/S 12345678 G/C ~ V/C ~Y S & ~ NB L 12.0 47 1 8. T 12.0 642 1 R 12.0 13 1 LTH 12.0 702 737 2081 0.354 1 0.500 1040 0.708* 8.3 BI ~-£-"~:;---~- ................. -1 ................................. T 12.0 571 1 I B R 12.0 65 1 Lq 12.0 649 681 2205 0.309 1 0.500 1103 0.618 7.2 B ........................................................................+ EB L 12.0 57 2 6.9 T 12.0 103 2 B R 12.0 91 2 LTR 12.0 251 251 950 0.264 2 0.500 475 0.528* 6.9 B i-£-'-ii73--ia~--ia~-iiii-aTii~---i; ..... aTi~i--iii--aTiii:-iiTi-&T-i~Ti ~i-£---iiTa---i~ .................. i ................................ T-Ti 12.0 184 45 ! C T 12.0 121 2 I B 12.0 92 45 { R 12.0 22 2 12.0 276 276 1241 0.222 45 0.409 508 0.544 13.6 B~ Lq 12.0 156 156 999 0.156 2 0.500 500 0.312 5.5 B :~~=~~ ............ ~=~7~=~7~===~7~=~7~===~ .......................................................................... *=CRr~ICAL LANE GROUP DELAY= 7.5 SEC/VE~ V/C =0.62 LOS=B LO~ Softwar~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinberger Trans. Inc. by TJKM ====================================================== .................. __%~,_~Lion: p.M. ~ ~,=~=: ~.i,t~,~ n-a=eZic VOX,.,,, .......... Ilql~E~ON S South State_. St../P~rkins Street City of ~kiah --- Count Date 5/21/96 '&=me 4:30-5:30 PM Peak ~ 4:30-5:30 PM ........................................................................ 85 H~ Operations A~D, 47 595 118 ,o-s~.c ~= .... I .... v .... I i-~:£~- -~4 'q 0.0 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.0 --- 108 2 S-LT~ 25 3 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (~0. OF LJ~S) 1.1<--- 214 3 W-LTR 21 3 0.0 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2&2 1.1 1.1 --- 109 : <--7 7--> v W + E 7 42 84 ================================================= ======== RTOR CNFL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS%HVY ARR PEAK HOUR SAT ......................................................................... 12345678 LT TH RT LEPT THRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 WB 0 0 0 N 0 . 0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 ================================================== ~ W323'1~.{ ADJ SaLT ~ UROUP 0 DELAY Gi~OO'P (N'r.) %K)L VOL } V/S 12345678 O/C CAP.;~d21 V/C DELAY S & ~&-£---~73---:£ ................. i ................................. 1-i4-3 T 12.0 432 1 { 'C R 12.0 84 l LTR 12.0 591 621 2196 0.283 1 0.350 769 0.807* 19.0 C! ................................................................... + ..... SB L 12.0 218 2 T 12.0 505 2 I 48.1 R 12.0 43 2 E L~ 12.0 766 804 2207 0.364 2 0.350 772 1.041- 48.1 E ~-£---~7~--~j ................... S ........... ..................... T 12.0 214 3 D R 12.0 108 108 960 0.113 3 0.300 288 0.375 14.6 B LT 12.0 323 323 1110 0.291 3 0.300 333 0.970* 43.9 E~ ==================================================== ~n~a= ~ UR~m ~Y= 35.7 s~-c/v~ v/c =0.94 ============================ ................... m~-~00~. ~, ~00 ~7W67~7775~=. ~=: ==== LOS Softwmx~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinberger Trans. Inc. by TJKM ============================================= ....... 05/31/9~ ============================================================ INTERSECTION 6 North State St./StancIley _Street City of Ukiah Count Date 5/21/96 Ti~ 4:30-5:30 PM Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 PM 85 H~ Operations ACTT$%TED, 5i2 42 SO-SEC CYCLE ^ ~ P~ASE GRN Y+R LOST 101 i 1.1 0.0 2.1 1.1 0.0 --- 0 2 S-LT 25 3 ___ 78 ~ 1.1 (NO.OF L~} 0.0<--- 0 3 E-LTR 21 3 0.0 ___ 165 I 1.0 0.0 2~1 1.1 0.0 --- 0 v W+E 54 18 S ========================================================================= 12345678 LT TH RT LEFT ~U RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SE 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 ============================== ============================================ LANE L APR~ ~ WID/7{ ADJ SJtT ORDER GROUP 0 DELAY NB T 12.0 514 1 R 12.0 18 1 I 14'~ ~ 12.0 532 559 2704 0.207 1 0.350 946 0.590* 14.4 Bi ............ ~-L---i;:~---~ ............ 2 + ................................ ~T. 12.0 101 ............... ~ ............................... ~' ..... ========================================================================= *=GRITICAL LANE GROUP DELAY= 17.2 SEC/VEH V/C =0.67 LOS=C ===================================== ............. z~-~,z o o ~. z~, ~=ur, zoo =x. ~r~, ~i~ ~:~~ ...................... LOS Softwaxe Licensed to Whitlock & Weinberc3er Trans. Inc. by T~ ======================================== .................. condition: p.~. ~ .~=: ~t~n~ ~i~-~gi~ ..................... os/31/96 Count Date _ .......... ~ 4:00-6:00 PM Peak }k~ur 4:30-5:30 PM .5 .~ ~.~ ....................................................... 94 643 0 50-SEC CYCLE ___ 13B --J 1.1 1.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 --- 0 S-TR 2 E-iR 10 4 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO.OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0. _._ 55 I 1.1 1.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 --- 0 <--- ~ ---> W+E 5 51 0 S ========================================================================= RTOR C~qFL P~D W/ MIN PRK %G~ BUS %HVY ARR PF. AK ~OUR SAT APP VP~ PEDS PHASE ~ ~ STP VEH ~gfP F~fOR FLOW ......................................................................... 12345GTB LT TH RT L~ THRU NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 lll3 ================================================= LANE WIDTH ~ SAT ' OPdDER GROUP O DELAY GROUP (D~.) VOL VOL FIX)W V/S 1234567B O/C CAP;kC V/C DELAY S & LOS ........................................................................ NB L 12.0 56 1 + LT 12.0 607 637 2254 0.2B3 1 0.720 1623 0.393* 1.B A ~G-~---J_TG--~&~ ........................................ ................ 1 R 12.0 94 1 1. B ..................... EB L 12.0 13B 2 ................................ + ..... T 12.0 0 I 17.3 R 12.0 55 2 C L~ 12.0 193 193 917 0.210 2 0.2B0 257 0.752* 17.3 C ========================================================================== *=CRITICAL LANE GROUP DELAY= 3.7 SEC/V~]{ V/C =0.49 LOS--A =========================== .................. ~=~oo=x. m~, vo,~o o ~7W6i~C_-TTT~/~7~ ...................... LOS Softwax~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~er Trans. Inc. by TJKM ======================================================================== Condition: P.M. Peak Hour: Ex/st/n~ 7k-affic Volumes 05/31/96 ======================================================================== I~~ON 8 North State St./Nortc~ St~t City of Ukiah Count Date .................... ~ 4:00-6:00 PM Peak ~km/r 4:30-5:30 PM 85 H(~ Operations .................................................... 0 702 0 50-SEC CYCLE ....... ___ i-4,:..F4'- -~,; --;, -~.-~ o--! o.o <o.o 271 1.1 1.o t o 2 W-LR 10 4 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF ~) 0.0<--- 0 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 --- 35 . I v W + E 5 1 132 S ========================================================================= R~T)R(~qFL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS %HVY A~R PEAK HOUR SAT 12345678 LT TH RT LEb~f THRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ========================================================================= LANE AD3 PHASE LANE WIDI/~ A~J SAT .... LANE L { A~RCH · ~ u~e.~ GRO GROUP (Fr.) VOL VOL ~ V/S 12345678 G/C C/~:~AC V/C ~ NB T 12.0 551 1 ........................ + ..... R 12.0 32 i 1 ~ 12.0 583 612 2995 0.204 1 0.720 2156 0.2841.6 44-L---ij3 .... ~ ................. i ................................. +. ..... ? 12.0 702 1 _~! ..................................................... ~BL 12.0 35 35 1047 0.033 2 0.2~0 293 0.119. 1~0.~ ~ 10.~ R 12.0 0 0 937 0.000 2 0.280 262 0.000 . ===--=========__====~===.==== ..................... ============================= ................... nw--u~o o ~:x. n,r~, vor~ o o ~x7~,~7~C~_- 777B7~_.~7~ ...................... LOS Softw-~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~3er Tra~s. Inc. by TJKM ================================================= I/~TERSECTION 9 North State St./Low Gap Road City of Ukiah (k~unt Date Tim.4:00-6:00 PM Peak ~ 4:30-5:30 PM 85 H(~W Operations NON-f~D 111 619 124 69-SEC CYCLE ^ P~J%~E GRN Y+R LOST ! <--- v .... t [-~-£~ 32-'~ o.o 149 --- 1.0 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 56 2 EW-LTR 25 6 0.0 38 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LARES) 1.1<--- 37 83 --- 1.1 1.i 2A2 1.1 1.1 --- 30 W+ E 7 87 32 S ......................... .......... _-_-:_-_-_-=_-~==_-==:==:=_-~= .... ~-~--~-~?--~--~=----;,: B~ ,,m,v ~,~ ~ HOUR ........................................................................ 12345678 LT '1/-I RT I~ 'I¥1RU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 GROUP (FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 O/C CAPAC V/C DELAY S & LOS ................................................................... + ..... ~ L 12.0 71 1 19 T 12.0 807 1 ' R 12.0 32 LTR 12.0 910 955 1902 0.502 1 0.551 !047 0.912' 19.2 CI ~'£---~:~--~; ................. ~ ................................. T 12.0 629 1 ! 'B R 12.0 114 1 | LTR 12.0 767 805 1957 0.412 1 0.551 1078 0.747 11.0 B! ................................................................... + ..... EB L 12.0 149 149 1210 0.123 2 0.449 544 0.274 9.1 B 9.0 T 12.0 38 2 [ B ~ 12.o 83 2 ~ 12.0 121 121 ]'4F~4:0.089 2 0.449 608 0.199 8.8 BI 44-£'--i~_~3---Z4 .................. ~ ........ = ....................... T 12.0 37 2 | B R 12.0 56 2 __3~_L~:0.:~L:~L:~L=0__.~L:~ ....0.449 390 0.315. ,.4 ~{ *=CRIq~/CAL LA~]~ GROUP D~U~AY= 14.2 SEC/VE~ V/C =0.64 LOS=B INT=UKI00]J~X. INT, VOL=UFdC001EX. 1~, (:lAP=-... LOSC. AP .'lAB -- LOS Softwmx~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbe~ger Trans. Inc. by TJ~M =========================================== .......... Condition: P.M. Peak Dkm~r: Existing Traffi¢-5~i~i ...................... 05/31/9~ ============================================== =========================== INTER~ECTION 10 North State St./Empire/Ford . City of Ukiah Count Date Time 4:00-6:00 PM Peak Hour 4:30-5:30 PM ........................................... 85 H(SW Operations ............................. ^ ^ PHASE GRN ¥+R LOST -__ I <--- ,, ---> 143 --i 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 76 2 X~-TR 32 3 0.0 3 EW-L 20 3 0.0 45 ---> 1.1 (NO.OF I2~NES) 1.1<--- 64 4 EW-TR 20 3 0.0 ___ 25 [ 1.1 1.0 2&l 1.1 1.0 --- 120 W+E 6 6 85 S ======================================================================== 12345678 ......... £~ ~i 44 ~ ~&6 ~4 ...... ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 152 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 152 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 111 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 111 ========================================================================= LANE WIIYIH ADJ SAT ORDER (2~OUP 0 DELAy G~DUP (FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C DELAY + NB L 12.0 66 66 1434 0.046 1 0.221 317 0 208* 25.2 DI 27. T 12.0 654 2 ' R 12.0 185 2 ____~___p_._o__:~_:__:~L~_:Lo_0.302 2 0.337 ,83 0.896-27.7 a~_ 12.0 53 53 1434 T 12.0 645 2 ........ R 12.0 92 2 ~ 12.0 737 774 2963 0.261 2 0.337 997 0.776 22.3 C[ T 12.0 45 a .... ~ ,.,1 ,~o.~ R 12.0 2s TR 12.0 70 70 1043 0.067 4 0.221 231 0.303 22.0 C1 ll:oo 120 1047 0.115 34 0.221 232 0.518 28.7 27.: R 12.0 76 4 ____TI~____l~__._0___140 140 1012 0.138 4 0.221 224 0.626* 26.8 Di *=CRITICAL LA.NE GROUP DELAY= 25.8 SEC/VEH V/C =0.62 LOS=D ===================== ................... n~-~oou=, n~,vo~:~.c~oo=x.W&~_-TT:L~7~ ...................... LOS Software Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~er Trans. Inc. by TJKM =============: =========== ========== Cc~ditic~: P.M. P~ak Hour: Existing TXaffic Volu~s 05/31/96 ===================================== ..... INTERSECTION 11North State St./KUKI Lane City of Ukiah Count Date Time 4:00-6:00 PM Peak ~ 4:30-5:30 PM 85 HCM Operaticm~s AC~TUtTED,NON-f~D 147 676 89 73-SEC CYCLE ^ { ^ ~ G{RN___ Y+R LOST --- v ---> I ~'-~L~:£-- 11--;-~'~) 149 --! 1.1 <1.0 2.0 1.0 1.1 --- 105 2 NS-TR 32 4 0.0 3 EW-LTR 18 4 0.0 13 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 20 67 --- 1.1 1.0 2~1 1.1 1.1 --- 14 W + E 7 72 S ========================================================================= RTOR CNFL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS %HVY ARR PEAK HOUR SAT APP VPH Pi/DS PHASE GRN ING GPJ% STP VEH TYP FACTOR FLOW 12345678 LT ~ RT LEPT THRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.0 1084 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.0 1084 ============================================================= ...... ~ ADJ PHASE LANE L APRf~ LANE WIUTH ADJ ~AT ORDER GROUP (FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAI)AC V/C DELAY S© DELAY&Los ~-£-'-i~7~---~_---~-i;~;-~43-i ........ ~7~4--;.~4--~.-~;,2--i~74-6 .... T 12.0 792 2 B R 12.0 13 2 ~ 12.0 805 845 3012 0.281 2 0.493 1485 0.569* 8.8 B SB L 12.0 89 89 1434 0.062 1 0.205 295 00.302* 18.9 ~ 8.9 T 12.0 676 710 3020 0.235 2 0.493 1489 .477 8.1 B R 12.0 147 147 1283 0.115 2 0.493 633 0.232 6.9 B ............................. T 12.0 13 3E E R 12.0 67 3 LTR 12.0 229 229 773 0.296 3 0.301 233 0.983* 50.9 ,;,i-£---J_ .-j--i;, ................... ~ ............................... T 12.0 20 3 { C R 12.0 105 3 ! LTR 12.0 139 139 856 0.162 3 0.301 258 0.539 15.2 C{ ========================================================================= · =CRI~/CAL LANE GROUP DEL~Y= 14.1 SEC/VEH V/C =0.64 LOS=B ========================================================================= INT=UKI001EX . INT, VOL=UKI001EX . PMV, CAP=-. . . LOSCAP. TAB LOS Softwax~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinberger Trans. Inc. by TJKM Ckmant D~te 5/29/96 Tiras 12:00-1:00 PM P~ak }k~ar 12:00-1:00 PM 85 HCM Operatic~s ~L"T~, NON-CBD 114 472 19 73-SEC CY~ t A PHASE GRN Y+R LOST .................. --- v ---> I 1 N~-L 8 4 0.0 116 ...... 1.1 <1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 19 2 bis - "/~ 37 4 0.0 3 EW-LTR 16 4 0.0 28 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF I2~) 1.1<--- 28 35 --- 1.1 1.0 1Al 1.1 1.1 --- 29 v ~ ~ ) ' 34v N W+E 3 47 S RqDR CNPL PED W/ MIN P~K % BUS %HVY ARR PEAK HOUR ~AT APP VPHPEDS PHASE ~RNIN~ GRASTP VEH TYP FACTOR FLOW ......................................................................... 12345678 LT ~{ RT LEPT ~rn~u P~ NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 LANE WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER ~ROUPODELAY GROO'P (FT.) %~DL %K3L FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C C~ V/C D~ S&LOS T 12.0 477 2 ~ B R ~. 0 34 2 { ~ ~.0 511 511 1495 0.342 2 0.562 840 0.609* 7.7 B{ ................................................................... + ..... ~ L ~.0 19 19 1434 0.013 i 0.1~ 236 0.081 19.6 C 6.2 T ~ .0 472 2 B R ~. 0 114 2 ~ 12.0 586 615 2931 0.210 2 0.562 1~6 0.374 5.8 B ......................................................................... ~ L ~.0 116 3 21.8 T ~.0 28 3 C R .~ .0 35 3 L~ 12.0 179 179 891 0,201 3 0.274 244 0.733* 21.8 C ...................................................................+ ~ .... ~ L 12.0 29 3 13.7 T ~ .0 28 3 B R ~ .0 19 3 L~ ~.0 76 76 917 0.083 3 0.274 251 0.~03 13.7 B *=~ ~ ~ ~= 9.4 ~C/~ V/C =0.56 ~=B LOS Softwar~ Licen~ to Whitlock & Weir~xc3er ~u~s. Inc. by TJKM =========== City of E~ciah 0 --- 0.0 0.0 211 1.1 1.0 --- 260 W+E 0 40 98 S === 12345678 LT TH RT LEFT THRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ==== LA}~ WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER ~ 0 DELAY E~X2tY -~ & LOS GROUP (FT.) ~DL ~K)L FLOW V/S 12345678 ~/C CAPAC V/C ........................................................................+ NB · 12.0 450 t R 12.0 198 1 ~ ~.0 ~8 680 2881 0.236 1 0.329 ~7 0.718' 15.5 C[ _____....__..___ ................................................... + ..... EL ~-0 257 2 I 15.~ T ~ .0 397 2 t LT 12.0 654 687 2961 0.232 2 0.329 973 0.705* ~.2 C ....................... ~ ................................................ + R ~.0 278 278 937 0.297 3 0.342 321 866* 27.0 *=C~_ITICAL ~ G~ D{~%Y= 17.9 S~C/VEH V/C =0.76 LOS=C INT~-UKI1CEMD. INT, VOL=UKI001EX . ~14V, CAP=-... LOSCAP .T~B LOS Softw~x~ Licensed to Whitlock a Weinbev~er Trans. Inc. by TJ~4 Condition: Midday peak F~ur: Ooordinated Existing Vols. 06/18/96 INTERSECTION 3 South State St./Gobbi Street City of UR/ah Count E~ate 5/21/96~'Jane'F~ (4%) Peak }Rmhr 12:00-1:00 PM ........................................................................ 85 HC~ Operatica~s AL~F~A~I~D,NON-C~3D ^ ^ P~ ~ Y+R L~ { <--- v ---> { i-k4--£ .... 4 --; -Z3 · ~ 56 --- 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 84 2 NS-TR 18 4 0.0 3 EW-Y. 6 4 0.0 lB7 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF ,~) 1.1<--- 174 4 W-LTR 8 0 0.0 5 EW-TR 17 4 0.0 62 --- 1.1 1.0 2xl 1.1 1.0 --- 199 W+E 6 41 28 S RTOR C~FL P~D W/ MIN PRK % BUS%HVY ARR PEAK HOUR SAT AI::'P VPH ~ ~ OP.NII~ GRA. ~ ~ T%'P F~X)R FLOW 12345678 LT TH RT LEPT ~/4RLT RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1319 LANE WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER GROUP 0 DELAY GROUP (~'~) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C DELAY S & LOS NB L 12.0 62 62 1434 0.043 1 0.164 236 0.263 20.4 C 17.1 T 12.0 491 2 C C R 12.0 128 2 ~ 12.0 619 650 2926 0.222 2 0.301 882 0.737* 16.7 T 12.0 460 2 | C R 12.0 25 2 | TR 12.0 485 509 2996 0.170 2 0.301 903 0.564 14.4 Bt T 12.0 187 5 [ C R 12.0 62 5 TR 12.0 249 249 1453 0.171 5 0.288 418 0.596* 15.9 C T 12 . 0174 45 { C R 12.0 84 45 ~ 12.o ~, ~s,m~ o.~os ~s o.~ 4,~ o.s~ ~.s,~ *:~ ~ ~ ...........___________________________ LOS Softwaxe Licensed to Whitlock & Wsirdm~r T~ans. Inc. by TJKM Ck~dition: Micktay Psak D~c~r: ~zx~izmt~ Existif~3 Vols. 06/18/96 INTERSECTION 4 south State St./Mill Street . City of Ukiah Cc~a~t Date 5/21/96 ~ F~"rOR (4%) P~ak Hour 12:00-1:00 PM 85 HCM Operatic~ls 6T 5T8 12 73-SEC CYCLE ^ . ^ PHASE G~N Y+R LOST ....... t <--- v ---> I 37--;. o.o s3--- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1--- 21 2~--m 28 4 0.0 96 ---> 1.1 (~. OF I2~) 1.1<--- 112 84 --- 1.1 1.1 2x2 1.1 1.1 --- 12 N W+E 4~ ~ 54 12 S ~ CNFL ~ W/ MIN P$~K % BUS %H1~ ~ PEAK HOUR SAT A~P VPH I~gDS PHASE GRiq Ib]3 G~ STP ~ ~ FD~-~fOR FLOW ......................................................................... 12345678 LT TH RT ~ ~HRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 LANE ADJ PHASE ~ L { I2%NE WID~ ~ SAT O~DER ~ 0 ~ ~ (~.) ~L ~L ~ V/S 12345678 G/C ~ V/C s ................................................................... + ..... ~ L 12.0 44 1B 7. T 12.0 594 1 R 12.0 ~ 1 L~ ~.0 650 682 2076 0.329 1 0.562 1166 0.585* 7.2 44-Z-'iZZ--H ................. i ................................. T 12.0 528 1 / B R 12.0 60 1 L~ 12.0 600 630 2192 0.287 i 0.562 ~31 0.512 6.6 BI T 12.0 96 2 ~ B R 12.0 84 2 L~ 12.0 233 233 934 0.249 2 0.438 409 0.569* 11.1 B ~-J--HTZ--i~ .................. ~ ................................ T 12.0 112 . 2 ~ B R 12.0 21 2 L~ ~.0 145 145 999 0.145 2 0.438 438 0.331 8.8 B~ .................................. *=~ITICAL ~ GROUP DE~2kY= 7.7 SEC/VEH V/C =0.58 LOS=B ~~?~?~C~gg~--.~?~??=. ~?~?~ ...................... LOS Softwmx~ Licensed to Whitlock & We~... z~3er Trans. Inc. by TJEM Cc~ditic~: Mick~ay Pemk ~our: Coordinate~ Existing Vols. 06/18/9~ ======================================= INTERSECTIG~ 5 South State St./Perkins Street City of Ukiah Count Date 5/29/96 Time 12100-1100 PM Peak Hour 12100-1100 PM ........................................................................ 85 H(~40~eratic~s AL~Ft~TED, 3 W-LTR 21 3 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 {NO. OF LA/~S) 1.1<--- 226 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 106 W+ E 7 3 04 S 12345678 LT TH RT LEPT ~RU NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 .............. ====================== GRfFJP (FT.) VOL %~DL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CA~A~ V/C DELAY G:-£'--:::~---:,~ ................. :- 29.8 T 12.0 384 1 D R 12.0 104 1 LTR 12.0 560 588 2181 0.270 1 0.288 627 0.937* 29.8 D ........................................................................+ S~ L 12.0 242 2 33.5 T 12.0 496 2 D R 12.0 60 2 LTR 12.0 798 838 2199 0.381 2 0.38~ 843 0.993* 33.5 D ~&-£---:::~--:~ .................................................... 3 T 12.0 226 3 D R 12.0 108 108 960 0.113 3 0.329 316 0.342 12.2 LT 12.0 332 332 1111 0.299 3 0.329 365 0.909* 30.7 D ========================================= *=CRITICAL LAtZ ~ D~LAY= 30.5 SEC/VEH V/C =0.95 LOS=D ~,~:~,: 1~. ~,~, v~oo=x. ~4~?~???~?~ ...................... LO~ Softw-~x~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbe~jer Trans. Inc. by TO~M =============================================== ......... O6/lS/96 ================================================= ............................... 85 H~ ~ti~s ......................................... --- 2.1 1.1 0.0 --- 0 2 S-LT 2~ 3 0.0 . 3 E-L~ 22 3 0.0 156 ---> 1.1 (~. OF ~) 0.0<--- 0 ___ ~8 ~ 1.0 0.0 2~1 1.1 0.0 --- 0 , < ...... > N W+E 6 22~ ~0 S ~ ~ ~ W/ ................................................... ~ ~ % B~%~ ~ ~ ~ ......................................................................... ~345678 LT ~ ~ ~ ~U ~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 152~ .... ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 126 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 126 ============================================== ~ ~ ~ =========================== ~ (~.) ~L ~L ~ V/S ~34567S G/C ~ V/C D~ S & ~-~---~--~-R ~ .0 260 ....................................................... 11 ~ 16.~ ~ ~.0 482 506 2498 0.203 1 0.288 719 0.704* 16.9C~ T 12.0 323 323 1~9 0.286 2 0.370 418 0.774 1812 C{ ~-~---~--~ ...................~ ..................................... LT 12.0 280 280 1104 0.2~ 3 0.342 378 0.741' 18. ========================================================================= *=~ ~ ~ ~= 1~.1 ~C/~ V/C =0.77 ~=C ...... ~1~. ~, ~00 ~. ~, ~... ~.~ ====================== LOS Softwar~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~jer Trans. Inc. by T0~M .......... ===============: .... Condition: Midc%ay P~mk }k~r: O0oxxtinated Existing Vols. 06/18/96 INTERSECTION 7 North State St./Scott Street City of Ukiah C~t Date 5/21/96 ~ F2~ (4%) Peak Hour 12:00-1:00 PM ........................................................................ 85 HCM Operations 27 614 0 73-S~C CYCLE - Ill - · ...... > I 1 N-LT 45 4 0.0 84---[ 1.1 1.1 271 0.0 0.0 --- 0 S-TR 2 E-LR 20 4 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 28 --- 1.1 1.1 2~1 0.0 0.0 --- 0 W+E 3 5 0 S 12345678 LT TH RI' LEFT THRU RGIHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EM 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ____ ~ ADJ PHASE LANE ~ANE W. IUTH ADJ SAT . ORDER GROUP O I D~LAY 12.0 34 1 LT 12.0 579 608 2386 0.255 1 0.671 1602 0.380* 3.5 A SBT 12.0 614 1 3 ..3 R 12.0 27 1 12.0 641 673 3000 0.224 1 0.671 2014 0.334 3.3 A ................................................................... + ..... EM L 12.0 84 2 [ 12.4 T 12.0 0 B R 12.0 28 2 LTR 12.0 112 112 920 0.122 2 0.329 302 0.370* 12.4 B ============================== *=C~CFI~CAL ~ GROUP DELAY= 4.2 SEC/VEH V/C =0.38 LOS--;% ========================================================================= ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: INTERSECTION 8 North State St./Nortc~ Street City of Ukiah Oou~t Date 5/21/96 T/me FACTOR (44} P~ak ~k~tr 12100-1100 85 HCa4 0peratio~s ACTUATED, NON-C~D 0 636 67 73-SEC CYCLE · ....... I 1-~1%i-- 0-! 0.0 0.0 271 1.1 1.0-- 153 2 W-I~R 22 4 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2Al 1.1 1.0 --- 44 v W+E 58 S ============================================= 12345678 LT TH RT LEPT ~%]RU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113  ==~? ............ ~ ........ ~IASE w. xur4. ADJ SAT . OP. DER GROUP 0 [ DELAY _(~'___O~__.I_PT-}____V?_L___V?_L___FI/~_____V/S 12345678 G/C ~;U~ V/C DELAY SI& LOS NB T 12.0 578 1 A 3 R 12.0 51 1 TR 12.0 629 660 2983 0.221 1 0.644 1921 0.344 3.9 :&-£---:;_:~---j~ ......................................................... 1 T 12.0 636 1 ] 4'i LT 12.0 703 738 2279 0.324 1 0.644 1467 0.503* 4.6 A WB L 12.0 44 44 1047 0.042 2 0.356 373 00.118 12.0BB 12.i R 12.0 153 153 937 0.163 2 0.356 334 .458* 12.3 ........ ============ ============= *=CRITICAL LANE GROUP DELAY= 5.3 SEC/VEH V/C =0.49 LOS=B ==================== ....................... m~-b'r,: 1~. m~, ~:~?~33 :u~-. i~r?: ~_:: 71~. ~ .................. LOS Software Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbexc3er Trans. Inc. by TJKM Co~clitic~: Midday ====================================================== P~ }~ur: Coorc~t~ ~b(/stir~3 Vols. 06/18/96 ======================================================================== INTERSECTI(~N 9 North State St./Low Gap P~)ad City of Ukiah (km/~t Date 5/29/96 ~ 12200-1200 PM P~ak F&m/r 12200-1200 PM 85 Hf/M Operatic%~s NON-C~D 67 7O0 39 73 -SEC CYCLE ' i ! ' PHASE GRN Y+R LOST .... v .... I ~'~:£~ -~£ --~ -676 116 I 1.0 1 1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 65 2 EW-LTR 16 6 0.0 --- . · 63 --- > 1.1(NO. OF LA~.S) 1.1<--- 60 ___ 118 I 1.1 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 23 W + E 8 74 30 ============================================================= ................................... 12345678 LT TH I~P ~ ~6-~ ...... NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 ====================================================== G~O~P (FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C DELJtY S & LOS ...................................... + .................................. NB L 12.0 89 T 12 0 794 1 7.0 ' 1 B R 12.0 30 1 LTR 12.0 913 959 1831 0.524 1 0.699 1279 0.749* 7.0 B ~-£---HTj--~ ................. ~ ........................................ T 12.0 700 1 5.3 R 12.0 64 1 B LTR 12.0 803 843 1890 0.446 1 0.699 1320 0.639 5.3 B ...................................... - ....... T 12.0 63 2 C R 12.0 118 2 TR 12.0 181 181 1362 0.133 2 0.301 410 0.441 16.1C T 12.0 60 2 ! 'C R 12.0 65 2 ! ___L~ 12.0 148 148 870 0.170 2 0.301 262 0.564* 18.4 C/ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: *=~CAL I~ (~ DE~= 8.4 SEC/VEH V/C =0.69 LOS=B ============================================= INT=UKIlCO~D. INT, VOL=UKI001EX. ~4V, CAP=-. . . LOSCAP. T~B .... LOS Softwax~ Licensed to Whitlc~k & W~inh~x~mr 'Prar~. ~c. ~ T~ ----' ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ti~: ~y ~ ~: ~~ ~st~ Vols. 06/18/96 ======================================================================== ~~ 10 ~ Stat~. St./~/Fo~ . City of ~ ~t ~ 5/21/96 '~%~ ~ (10%) ~ ~ ~:00-1200 ~ 85 H~ ~ti~ ............................................ 73-~C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y+R ~ ~--- ~ ---> ~ ~'~L ....~ -q -676 155 --! 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.01.1 --- 59 2 ~-~ 28 3 0.0 3 ~-L 16 3 0.0 43 ---> 1.1 (~. OF ~) 1.1<--- 48 4 ~-~ 10 3 0.0 ___ 28 [ 1.1 1.0 2~1 1.1 1.0 --- N v W + E 5 5 7 6 S ========================================================================= .... __. N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~25 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 .... ========================================================= ............................................ .~_ ~ ~/u ~ SI& ~ ~ L ~.0 50 50 1434 0 035 1 0 ..................... + ..... T ~.0 597 ' 2 .~7 196 0.255 21.6 C 11.8 R ~ .0 ~6 2 B ~ ~.0 733 770 2935 0.262 2 0.425 ~46 0.618' 11.2B+ T ~.0 ~9 2 B R 12.0 63 2 ~ ~.0 712 748 2979 0.251 2 0.425 ~65 0.591 10.9B ~-~---5;;--~--;;;-~-~-~;---; ...... ;-;~;--;;;--~-~::-::-~-? ..... T 12 0 43 ' '4 · ~-~ u.~u~ l~.~ C 19.2 R 12 ]0 =s 4 c ~ 12.0 v~ 7~ ~037 o.o~s 4 o.~7s lss 0.3~ ~v.7 c T ~ .0 48 4 R ~ .0 59 4 ~ ~.0 107 107 1011 0.106 4 0.178 180 0.594* 21.0 C ======================= · =~ ~ ~ ===================== ................. .... ~ ~.S ~C/~ V/C =0.56 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~1~. ~, ~00~.~, ~...~.~ LOS Software Licensed to Whitlock & We/nbercjer T~-~ns. Inc. by TJKM Cc~clit ic~: :::::::::::::::::::::::: .... =============================== ~ak Hca/r: Ck~ox~te~ ~-~cisti~ Vols. 06/18/96 == ..... = ..... = ...... 1211 ~ =~ ..... city of Ukiah _ ............... T/ms FA~T-uR (10%) Peak F&~r 12200-1200 PM 85 ~ o~ti~ ....................................................... 8,9 72~8 89 73-SEC CYCLE ^ I ! I ^ I~{ASE GRN Y+R LOST ___ - .... · I Y~:£-- .-~ -'; 12~ I 1.1 ~120 2.v0 1.0 1.1--- 74 2 ~S-T~ 30 4 0.0 3 EW-LTR 21 4 0.0 8 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 12 -__ 80 I 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.1 1.1 --- 28 <--- ~ ---· ~v W+E 8 76 9 S ...... ======================================================= RTOR f~qFL PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS%HVY ARR ~EAK HOUR SAT ......................................................................... 12345678 LT TH RT LEFT THRU NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.0 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.0,' 1084 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.0~ 1084 ========================================================================== ~ ADJ PHASE LANE L AP~(~I (H~OU~ (moup (FT.) VOL VOL Fr.O~ V/S 12345678 O/C CA~ V/C D~XAY ~ D~XA¥ &LOS T 12.0 776 2 B R 12.0 9 2 TR 12.0 785 824 3014 0.273 2 0.466 1404 0.587* 9.7 B ~ 12'0 89 ,~ i~ll i.!~,] ! _0.4.~_s_ 14070.54~ 9.3 s ......... · ~ ~.~oo ~.v~ ~- 0.466 598 0.149 7.2 B EB L 12.0 123 3 20.0 T 12.0 8 3 C R 12.0 80 3 LTR 12.0 211 211 819 0.258 3 0.342 280 0.752* 20.0 C ~-£---H:J-q~ ........................................................ 3 12.1 T 12.0 12 3 B R 12.0 74 3 LTR 12.0 114 114 863 0.132 3 0.342 296 0.386 12 1 =============================== · =========================================== · =CRi~PICAL ~ ~OUP DEIJkY= 11.4 S~C/VEH V/C =0.59 LOS=B .... ========================================================= IX)S Softwax~ Lic~ to Whitlock & Weinbex~3er Trans. Inc. by TJKM ================================ ...... ==__~ .... ~ 4:30-5:30 ~ ~ ~ 4:30-5:30 ~ ...................................... 85 H~ ~ti~ .................................. ~~, ~N-~D 142789 19 82-~C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Y+R~ ................... --- v ---> [ 1 ~-L 8 · 0.0 124 --~ 1.1 <1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 18 2 ~-~' 47 4 0.0 3 ~-L~ 15 4 0.0 7 ---> 1.1 (~. OF ~) 1.1<--- 12 %9 --- 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 30 . v ~ ~ ~ W+E 39 6 8 15 S ========================================================================== 12~" .................. ~%'~-~ ..... ~-~6-~ ...... ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 10~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 ========================================================================== ~ W~ ~ ~T 0~ .... (~.) ~L ~L ~ V/S ~345678 G/C ~ V/C D~Y ~ & ~ ....................................................... h ....... ~ T ~ .0 688 2 B R ~.0 ~ 2 ~ ~.0 703 703 ~05 0.467 2 0.622 93~ 0.751' 9.1 B T ~ .0 789 2 B R 12.0 142 2 ~ ~.0 931 978 2950 0.331 2 0.622 1835 0.533 5.9 B ~-t---HT~--~ ................... S .................................... T ~ .0 7 3 36.9 R ~.0 49 3 D L~ 12.0 180 180 897 0.201 3 0.232 208 0.866* 36.9 .......................................................... ~ ..... T ~.0 ~ 3 C R 12.0 18 3 L~ ~.0 60 60 886 0.068 3 0.232 205 0.292 17.0 C =================================== · =~ ~ ~ ~= ~0.S ~C/~ V/C =0.69 ~=~- ======================= ................... ~=~- ~, ~5~7~777~7~ .................. ==== LOS Soft~r~x~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~r Trans. Inc. by TJ](M ======================================================================== INTERSECTIO~ 2 South State St./Talmage Road City of Ukiah Co~h~t Date Time 4:30-5:30 PM ~ D~Dur 4:30-5:30 PM ............................................. 85 HCM Operations ........................... ACTUATED, ~ON- C~D 0 461 294 82-SEC CYCLE ___ --- v ---> { y4-~-- -~ --~ 0 I 0.0 <0.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 --- 317 2 S-LT 23 4 0.0 3 W-LR 24 3 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 --- 293 ' iii v W+E 52 48 S ========================================================================= L~ ~ ~-~===-=~===-=~=~==~--:~==~==~=~ = LANE WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER ' ~ L l APR(~I GROUP (PT) %~L VOL F~ V/S 12345 .... ' ....... OUP ......... 2_ ~ "'~ ~/~ ~ ¥/C DEI~y ~ 12.0 800 840 2879 0.292 1 0.341 983 0.854* 20.7 C ........................................ ................................ SB L 12.0 294 2 + T 12.0 461 2 I 19.5 LT 12.0 755 793 2962 0.268 2 0 329 97~ ~ ~1~. ~ = ~1 C ........................................... _' ..... ........ ~ =! WB L 12.0 293 293 1047 0 280 3 0 329 -~~--~-~'--Ii-i'--+' ..... · · ~ u.o~u bl.~ D 45.6 R 12.0 317 317 937 0.338 3 0.329 309 1.027- 58.4 EI E - . /~m v/c =0.90 ios=u ========================================================================= LOS Softwar~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbex~er T~. Inc. by TJKM ====================================== ............ ===== o=,,dition: ~,.~,. ~ ~,~-: o=~i~,2~-~i,r~3-~.. 06118196 INTERSECTION 3 South State St./C~i Street City of Ukiah. -- Oount Date Time 4:30-5:30 PM Peak ....................................... 85 HCM Operations ................................. 21 418 198 82-SEC CYCLE ^ PHASE GRN Y+R LOST 52 --- 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 92 2 NS-TR 24 4 0.0 3 EW-L 6 4 0.0 177 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF i~) 1.1<--- 184 4 W-L~ 10 0 0.0 5 EW-TR 18 4 0.0 ___ 61 I 1.1 1.0 2&l 1.1 1.0 --- 207 W+E 7 56 52 S ....... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RTOR ~ PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS %HVY ARR PEAK HOUR SAT ......................................................................... 12345678 LT 7~I RT LEFT 77{RU RGHT 1~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 k'R 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 W]B 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1319 ========================================================================= LANE AD3 PHASE LA~ WIfn%I ADJ SAT ORDER GROUP I~Y ~ ,. 12.0 72 T 12.0 576 2 C R 12.0 152 2 77~ 12.0 728 764 2925 0.261 2 0.341 999 0.765* 17.7 T 12.0 488 2 C R 12.0 24 2 TR 12.0 512 538 2998 0.179 2 0.341 1024 0.525 14.3 B ................................................................. T 12.0 177 5 C R 12.0 61 5 ~ 12.0 238 238 1452 0.164 5 0.268 390 0.611' 18.7 C {&-£---HT&--~&~--~&~-~i'&7la&---&~ ..... T 12.0 184 45 C R 12.0 92 45 ~ 12.0 276 276 1241 0.222 45 0.390 484 0.570 13.7 B ========================================================================= *=CRITICAL LANE GROUP DELAY= 18.0 SEC/VEH V/C =0.66 LOS=C =============================== ................... mT=~I~PM, mT, VO~00 ~. W6?~3J~-- 777[A~3&7~ ...................... LOS Software Li~$n$~d to Whitlock a Weinberger T~ans. Inc. by TJ~M ======================================================================== Cka~dition: P.M. Peak ~our: Coordinated Existing Vol 06/18/96 ============================== · =========================================== E_C_ON ..... 4. South State_. St../Mill Street City of ~kiah __-_.-__~_:7_~:_~_~ ........... ~_-__:--Lo-_~.-Lt~_____~_____~y_- 4:30-5=30 PM ~ ~rat~on. ~~:~6 ...... ^ ^ PHASE GRN Y+R LOST ___ --- ' ---> I ~-~:£~ -~;_ --~ -676 57 I i.i <l.1 2.v2 i.1 1.1 --- 22 2 E~-LTR 32 4 0.0 103 ---> 1.1 (NO.OF LR~E~) 1.1<--- 121 91 I 1.1 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 13 a I W+~- 4 62 13 ========================================================================= _~__~____~_.__~_______~k~_______~___9~___~ ~ ~ ~ 12345678 ......................................... LT TH RT LEFT THRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 .2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1 00 1.00 1.00 1146 ======================================================= GROUP (PT.} VOL VOL FL~ VIS 12345678 O/C CAPAC V/C ~-£---~:~---;~ ................. ~ ..................... : ........ R 12.0 13 Lq~ 12.0 702 737 2029 0.363 i 0.561 1138 0.648* 8.8 B ................................................................... + ..... SB L 12.0 13 T 12.0 571 1 I 7.~ ' R 12.0 65 1 LTR 12.0 649 681 2162 0.3151 0.561 1213 0.562 7.8 B ~-L---H~---~ ........ 2 .................. + ..... T 12.0 103 2 R 12.0 91 2 B L~ 12.0 251 251 919 0.273 2 0.439 403 0.622* 13.3 ~-£---~.-~---~ ................................................... + ..... 2 T 12 . 0121 2B 10 . R 12.0 22 2 L~ 12.0 156 156 999 0.156 2 0.439 439 0.356 10.1 ========================================================================= · =f~i~CAL [S~ GROUP DEI~Y= 9.2 SEC/VEH V/C =0.64 LOS=B =============================== ................ r,,rr:ur, z lCOpM. ~,rr, VO~0 0~x. Wr;~ ~:g--: 7 :F3~g,$~?~ .... ~ ................. LOS Software Lic~u.~ to Whitlock a Weinbex~er Trans. Inc. by TJ~M Condition: P.M. Pe~ Hour: Coor~ted E~sti~ Vol. 06/18/96 ====================== .... =_=___ ?nm~. _~ ..... s_ so~:g-~gggg~t./~ki~ st~.t city of L.Dunr.. Dare 5/21/96 ~ ~130-5130 ~ ~ ~ 4130-S130 ~-~-~::~ ................................. ~7~ .......... ~ sos ~:a a~-~c 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2.2 ~.1 1.0 --- 10~ 2 S-L~ 2~ 3 0.0 3 W-L~ 23 3 0.0 0 --->0.0 (~. OF ~) 1.1<--- 214 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2A2 1.1 1.1 --- 109 W+E 7 42 S ...... =2====== :2=============== RTOR ~ PED W/ MIN PRK % BUS%HVY ARR P~AK HOUR SAT ......................................................................... 12345678 LT ~d RT I2~ ~/~RU R~HT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1267 :::::::::::::::::::::: LANE WIDTH ADJ ~ ORDER GROUP 0 DEI2tY GRfFJP(~T.) %K)L IK)L FLOW V/S 12345678 O/C C~AC V/C ~-£---H:;---~4 ................. T 12.0 432 1 { D R 12.0 84 1 / L~ 12.0 591 621 2196 0.283 1 0.305 670 0.927* 29.5 D{ ........................................................................+ 12.0 218 ~ ~.0 505 ] I 3°4 R 12.0 43 2 ___?__~:_o___L%~ 804 2207 0.3a 2 0.378 834 0.964- 30.4 ~,. 12.0 109 ................... T 12.0 214 3 ! D R 12.0 108 108 960 0.113 3 0.317 304 0.355 14.2 B LT 12.0 323 323 1110 0.291 3 0.317 352 0.918- 34.5 DI *=(~ITICAL ~ (~RiX;P DELAY= 29.9 SEC/VEH V/C 20.94 LiDS=D ............... c=============_- ___ LOS Softw~r~ Licer~ to Whitlock & Wein~z=jer Trans. ~c. ~ T~ ===================================== ~ti~: P.M. ~ ~: ~~~ ~st~ Vol. 06/18/96 ======================================================================== ~~ 6 ~ Sta~ St./S~ey St~t City of ~ ~t ~ S/21/96 ~ 4:30-5:30 ~ ~ ~ 4:30-5:30 ~ ~-~-~:~ ................................. ~7~ .......... ~ ~ Y+R ~ i .... v .... ~ :-~:~-- ~s--~ o.o :0~--- :.~ 0.0 ~.: ~.~ 0.0--- 0 ~ s-:~ ~ ~ 0.0 3 E-L~ . 19 3 0.0 78 ---> 1.1 (~. OF ~) 0.0<--- 0 165 --- 1.0 0.0 2~1 1.1 0.0 --- 0 v I ~ 7 W+E ~ 54 18 S ========================================================================= ~ ~ ~ W/ M~ ~ % B~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ......................................................................... ~345678 LT ~ ~ ~ ~U R~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~67 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~67 ==================================================== ~ W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~Y ~ (~.) ~L ~L ~ V/S 12345678 G/C ~ V/C ~ S & ~ ~-%---~E&--~; ................. ~ ................................. + ..... 15 2 R ~ .0 lS ~ ~ C ~ 12.0 532 559 2704 0.207 1 0.341 923 0.605* ~.2 C~ ~-t-'-HT&---~ .................. ~ ................................. + ..... T 12.0 582 2 C 16 .~ LT ~.0 624 655 2250 0.291 2 0.390 878 0.746* 16.0 ~-E--~E&--~ ................... ~ ...............................· ..... R ~.0 165 165 960 0.172 3 0.268 258 0.~1' 20.2 LT 12.0 179 179 1098 0.163 3 0.268 295 0.608 19.1 =============================================== · =~ ~ ~ ~= 16.5 ~C/~ V/C =0.67 ~=C ============================================================ ~=~1~. ~, ~00~. ~, ~... ~. ~ LOS Softwmx~ Licensed to Whitlo~ & Weir~berger Trans. Inc. by TJKM ================================= ......... Condition: P.M. P~ }{our: Ooordinated ~bcisti~ Vol. 06/18/96 I~C~0~ 7 North State St./Scott Street City of Ukiah cou~lt Date 85 H~ Operati~m~s 94 643 0 82-SEC 138---~ 1.1 1.1 J1 o.o> o.oI o 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF I.J~_.B} 0.0<--- 0 55 --- 1.1 1.1 2;~1 0.0 0.0 --- 0 ~+!~. 5 51 0 PHASE Gi~N Y+R ~ i-~:£¢-- -;~ '-; S-TR 2 E-IR 29 4 0.0 RTOR C~FL P~D W/ MIN PRK % BUS%RVY ARR P~AK HOUR SAT APP VPH P~DS PHASE ORN INO GRA STP VEH TYP FAC2DR FLOW 12345678 LT ~ RT LEFT ~RU ROHT ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 I~ WIIYrH 2~DJ SAT ORDER (2~OUP O DEIAY GROUP (FT.) VOL VOL FL~ V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C I~Y S & LOS ~-£---117~---4~ .............. i t 6.3 T 12.0 551 1 { B LT 12.0 607 637 2157 0.295 1 0.598 1289 0.494* 6.3 B ........................................................................+ 12.0 643 1 ~ 12.0 737 774 2962 0.261 1 0.598 1770 0.437 5.9 BI ................................................................... + ..... EB L 12.0 138 2 B 12.9 T 12.0 0 B R 12.0 55 2 L~ 12.0 193 193 917 0.210 2 0.402 369 0.523* 12.9 ============================ *=C~i~C;kL LA~ GRfN3P D~¥= 6.9 SEC/V~ V/C =0.51 L~=B ====_-=======: n~=~i~PM, mT, vo~u,<:o o ~. PMv, ~_ ;77~?~ .... LOS Software Lio~n~d to Whitlock & Weinberger ~k-~ns. Inc. by TJKM ============ 2==========: :2======= Ck~mditio~: P.M. Peak ~=ur: ~oord~t~ Ex/sting Vol. 06/18/96 ============================== .............................. ~enoa 8 No~ ~tate-~::l?~gggg-~ggg~ ..... ~l:~-g~=~ ...... Count Date ~ 4100-6100 PM 85 HCa40peratica%s ACT~,~-f]~D 0 702 0 ' 82-SEC 0--! 0.0 0.0 2.Vl 1.1 1.0--- 0 2 W-~ 8 4 0.0 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2&l 1.1 1.0 --- 35 W+~- 51 32 ============================================================= R~ CNPL PED W/ MIN PR]( % BUS %HVY ~ PEAK HOUR SAT 12345678 LT ~H RT LEFT THRU RGHT NB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1305 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 ~ 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1113 ....... ==================================================== ~ SAT O~ GROt~ O J n~-v.~v ?_~?___~_~_:[__?__:__~_:___n:T_____v_/s 12345678 ~/c c~ v/c NB f 12.0 551 1 A 0 A7 R 12.0 32 1 ' TR 12.0 583 612 2995 0.204 1 0.854 2557 0.239 0.7 ................... + ..................................................... SB L 12.0 0 1 A 0.~ T 12.0 702 1 LT 12.0 702 737 2578 0.286 1 0.854 2201 0.335* 0.8 ii-~---ii:i---ii---ii-ia;:,-i:a:i--i ....... R 12.0 0 0 937 0.000 2 0.146 137 0.000 19.3 CI C ============: ............. *=CRrYICAL I~ GROUP D~= 1.4 SEC/VE~ V/C =0.32 LOS=A INT=--UKI1COPM . INT, VOI~=UKI001EX . P~B;, CAP=- . . . LOSCAP .~ ................... === IX)S Softw~x~ Licensed to Whitlock & Weinbexc3er T~ans. Inc. by TJKM ==================================================== (k~ditio~: P.M. ~ F&m/r: ~oox~t~ ~et~ Vol. 06/18/96 ======================================================================== INTERSECTION 9 North State St./L~w C~ap Road City of Ukiah Count Date Time 4:00-6:00 PM ~eak F~ur 4:30-5:30 PM ........................................................................ 85 HCM Operations NON-C~D 11T 679 124 B2-SECCYCLE A ^ PHASE GRN Y+R LOST --- ____ ___ 38 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF I2~) 1.1<--- 37 83 --~ 1.1 1.1 2~2 1.1 1.1 --- 30 ' W + E 7 '8~7 132 S 12345678 ........................................ LT TH RT ~ ~4RU R(H4T ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 SB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1146 EB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 WB 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 .... ~ =================================================== ~ WIDTH ADJ SAT ORDER GROUP O DELAY GROUP (FT.) VOL VOL FLOW V/S 12345678 G/C CAPAC V/C ~ S & LOS ............................. ...................................... + ..... NB L 12.0 71 1 T 12.0 807 1 4 R 12.0 32 1 LTR 12.0 910 955 1924 0.497 1 0.744 1431 0.668* 4.9 A ~-£---~7~---~ ................. ~ ....................................... T 12.0 629 1 3.8 R 12.0 114 1 A LTH 12.0 767 805 1977 0.407 1 0.744 1471 0.5483.8 A T 12.0 38 R 12.0 83 2 C ~ 12.0 121 121 1354 0.089 2 0.256 347 0.349 19.2 C ~&-£--q~:6---&6 ......................................................... 2 22.6 T 12.0 37 2 R 12.0 56 2 C L~ 12.0 123 123 854 0.144 2 0.256 219 0.562* 22.6 C ========================================================================== *=(m/TICAL LANE GROUP DELAY= 7.5 SEC/VEH V/C =0.64 LOS=B ================================= ................ ~=~I~PM. n~, VO~0 0ux. ~W? ~TC~i 7 7 7~7~ ...................... LOS Software Lioensed to Whitlock & ------ ============================================================= Cka~ditio~: ~.M. P~ Dit:mZF: ~X~ ~St~ Vol. 06/18/96 =========================================== ................ ....................................... · ' :3_ _.. 143 --~ 1.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 76 2 ~-~ 32 3 0.0 3 ~-L lB 3 0.0 45 ---> 1.1 (~. OF ~) 1.1<--- ~ % ~-~ 11 3 0.0 ___ 25 ~ 1.1 1.0 211 1.1 1.0 --- ~0 <--- ___> N v W+E 6 6 85 S ========================================================================= ......... ~345678 .............................. LT ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 152~'~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 152~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 111[ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 ======================= =================================================== ~ L~ ~ W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~y ~ (~-) ~ ~L ~ V/S ~345678 1'~ L 12.0 66 66 1434 0.046 i 0.146 210 0.315' 24.1 T 12.0 654 2 R 12.0 lBS 2 TR 12.0 839 8B1 2920 0.302 2 0.427 1246 0.707* 13.6 B! T 12.0 64S 2 R 12.0 92 2 TR 12.0 737 774 2963 0.261 2 0.427 126S 0.612 12.3Bi T 12.0 45 ,. .... CI 21 1 R 12.o 2s ; TR 12.0 70 70 1043 0.067 4 0.171 178 0.393 20.2 C! T 12.0 64 a ' ' ' I 282 ~ 12.0 76 g ~ 12.0 140 140 1012 0.138 4 0.171 173 0.810' 35.0 DI *=~ ~-~a~ ............ ~g=~:~:~=:=.:==~-~ ................ ============================ .......... _--___- / V~ V/C =0.62 LOS=C m~-~l~. ~, VO,~00 ~7W~_-_-777~?~ ...................... LOS Software Licensed to Whitlock & W~ir~mz~3~r Trans. Inc. ~ T~ ================================== ....... ========================================================================= ~~ 11 ~ S~ St./~ ~ City of ~t ~ .................. ~ 4:00-6:00 ~ ~ ~ 4:30-S:30 B5 H~ ~ti~ ...................................................... 147 G~6 ~89 82-~C ~ ~ ~ . ~E ~4~ ~ ~.~ <~ Jo ---> ~ ~-~---H-2-~ --- ~.0 z.~--- ~os ~-~ ~4 4 0.0 3 ~-L~ 25 4 0.0 13 ---> 1.1 (~. OF ~) 1.1<--- 20 67 --- 1.1 1.0 2~1 1.1 1.l --- W+E 7 7 2 S .... ============================================ .... ~345678 ............................................. LT ~ ~ ~ ~U R~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1525 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~25 ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 108~ ~ 0 0 0 N 0.0 0 2 2 2 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1084 ========================================================================== ~_~:~__~__~ ~ v/~ 12~s~, o/c ~= v/c ~ ~ ~.o ~ ~-~;~-3~343-~ ........ ~4~--~--~;-'~-6"-~3 T 12.0 792 2 R 12.0 ~ 2 B ~ 12.0 805 845 30~ 0.281 2 0.463 1396 0.606* 11.1 B ..................................... T .................................. SB L 12.0 89 89 1434 0.062 1 + T 12 0 676 710 3020 0 23S 2 ~'}9] _~ 9']~? 22.S C 11.1 ' · ~.~2 z~uu ~.507 10.2 B B ___R 12.0 1%7 1~7 12S3 0.115 2 0.463 S95 0.247 S.7 B ~ j--~%--~24 ......................................................... T 12.0 13 3D 28.9 3 R 12.0 67 3 D L~ 12.0 229 229 7S9 0.302 3 0.354 26S 0.SS3* 2S.9 T 12.0 20 3 R 12.0 10S 3 L~ 12.0 139 139 SS6 0.162 3 0.354 303 0.4S9 13.9 =============================== =========================================== · =~ ~ ~ ~Y= 13.~ ~C/~ V/C =0.64 ~=B ===================================================== ======= Appendix C Planning Level Cost Estimates Traffic Signal Coordination Feasibility Study Whitlock & Weinberger Tr .ansportation, Inc. City of Ukiah July 8, 1996 Interconnect/Street Improvements Planning Level Cost Estimate  Item t Quantity ~ Comments Interconnect and Coordinate State Street from KUKI Lane to Washington Avenue-Hastings Street Master 1 ea $10,000.00 $ 10,000 , ~Controllers 4 e----~-- $10,000.00 $ 40,000 Replace Modell 3115 ~'Terminal Strips 10 e~ $265.00 $ 2,650 ~'lnterconnect , 13000~ If $14.00 $ 182,000 __ Timing 1 I-~"- $5,000.00 $ 5,000 ~SUB-TOTAL $ 239,650 10% Contingency $ 23,965 ' , i____~_~U_B-TOTAL $ 263,615 25% for Engineering and ~ $ 65,904 t TOTAL - 1996. Dollars $ 329,519t Install left-turn pocket and provide protected left-turn phasing at Talmage Road Striping 550 If $6.00 $ 3,300 Includes cost for red curbing Detector Loops 20 ea $275.00 $ 5,500 'Signal Heads 2 ea $500.00 $ 1,000 SUB-TOTAL $ 9,800 10% Contingency $ 980 JSUB-TOTAL $ 10,780 25% for Engineer. ing and Inspection $ 2,695 I TOTAL - 1996 Dollars $ 13,475 ' I ilnstall left-turn pockets and provide left-turn phasing at Standley and Perkins Streets Striping 7001 If $6.00 $ 4,200 Includes cost for red curbing Detector Loops 44 ea $275.00 $ 12,100 Signal Heads 3 ea $500.00 $ 1,500 SUB-TOTAL $ 17,800 10% Contingency $ i,780 JSUB-TOTAL $ 19,580 25% for Engineering and Inspection $ 4,895 I TOTAL- 1996 Dollars $ 24,475 Install left-turn pockets at Mill, Scott and Norton Streets Striping 800 If $6.00 $ 4,800 Includes cost for red curbing Detector Loops 64 If $275.00 $ 17,600 SUB-TOTAL $ 22,400 10% Contingency $ 2,240 ~SUB-TOTAL $ 24,640 25% for Engineering and Inspection $ 6,160 I TOTAL- 1996 Dollars $ 30,800 I No warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy of the cost estimates as expressed in this document compared to bid or actual costs. W-Trans Page 1 Printed on 7/8/96 AGENDA SUMMARY ...ITEM NO. 9-C DATE: August 7, 1996 REPORT SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON BOTH SIDES OF SOUTH STATE STREET FROM 200 FEET NORTH OF MILL STREET TO 250 FEET SOUTH OF HASTINGS AVENUE SUMMARY: Staff has been notified of a successful application for a Hazard Elimination Safety project with Caltrans. This project is funded 90% by Caltrans and includes funding for engineering design. The matching funds of $5,000 have been approved and included in the fiscal year 1996/1997 budget fund 301.9829. This project would construct a two way left turn lane on South State Street from Mill Street to Hastings Avenue. The project would include short transitions into the two way left turn lanes north of Mill Street and south of Hastings Avenue. The project is tied closely to the W-Trans report on Traffic Signal Coordination. In that report it is recommended that two of the intersections within this project area, Mill Street and Talmage Road, be reconfigured to have a left turn lane with a protected left turn phase on the traffic signal. Due to the restricted time frame for submitting applications for Hazard Elimination Safety projects; staff did not review the project concept with the Traffic Engineering Committee. Through initial project design it has been determined that South State Street has insufficient width to allow both the two way left turn lane and curbside parking. At this time, staff is requesting direction from the City Council, in the form of the attached resolution, to restrict parking as indicated and to proceed with design of the project. The no parking zone would not take effect until the City Council awards a construction contract for this project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the attached resolution and direct staff to proceed with design of project. ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Direct staff to review the project with the Traffic Engineering Committee and return to City Council with the Committee's recommendation, 2. Do not approve resolution and direct staff to inform Caltrans that the City cannot participate in this project. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Acct. No.' 301.9829 Appropriation Requested: N/A (if budgeted) Citizen Advised: N/A Requested by: Prepared by: Rick Sean0r, Deputy Director of Public Works Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager Rick Kennedy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attachments. 1. Notice of project approval; 2. Project application; 3. Resolution RJS:AGNPZONE.SUM Candace Horsley, Cit~Manager STATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY · DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 1, P.O. BOX 3700 EUREKA, CA 95502-3700 TDD PHONE 707/445-6463 (707) 445-6397 PETE WILSON, Governor Febru-ary 27, 1996 Mr. Rick Kennedy Director of Public Works City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Dear Rick: The Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) program for the Federal fiscal year 1995/96 and 1996/97 has been approved. The following project for your agency has been included in this program. Location: 1-Men-0-Uki Project Location: South State Street from Mill Street to .'. south of Hastings Street Type of Work: Signal Detection Loops Federal Project No.: STPLH-5049(002) EA No.: 01-924350 Project Cost: $48,000 Federal Funds: $43,000 You will need to request Project Authorization including the field review forms and Local Programs agreement checklist as outlined in the Local Programs Procedures (PP 95-07 sent to you July 6, 1995). Federal authorization is required prior to any expenditure of funds. If you have questions or need assistance, please call my office. Sincerely, A. B. TOLAND Assistant District Local Assistance Engineer 300 UKI^H, CA 95482-5400 · ADMIN. 707/463-6200 · PUBUC SAFETY 463-6242/6274 · FAX # 707/463-6204 October 27, 1995 A1 Toland Local Assistance Engineer DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT 1 1656 Union Street Eureka, California 95501 · RE: CANDIDATE PROJECTS FOR THE 1995/96 AND 1996/97 HES LIST Dear Al: :. Enclosed are applications for two (2) HFS candidate projects which the City of Ukiah is submitting for consideration and inclusion in the upcoming two year HFS funding cycle. Our projects are listed below in the order of priority we have established: Pavement striping and marking modifications for the establishment of a two-way left turn lane on South State Street from Mill Street to Hastings Avenue. e South State Street and Gobbi Street traffic signalization upgrade and intersection improvement. The pavement stripping and marking modification project is being submitted for consideration under the Safety Index Project category and the traffic' signal upgrade and intersection improvement project under the Work Type Improvement category. The two-way left turn lane on State Street is needed to reduce rear end and right angle collisions involving vehicles making left turns from the inside traffic lane into intersecting streets and commercial driveways along State Street. State Street is a four (4) lane major collector with two (2) lanes of travel for both directions and parking On both sides of the street. Development along State Street is commercial and retail and has the highest ADT of all the streets within the City (above 18,000). _J_lll _1_ - - H II . I I [ I[ ! J.L. J._.J_ · ~,~/e Are Here To Serve" ~ II Mr. Al Toland October 27, 1995 Page 2 The traffic signal at State and Gobbi was installed in 1972 and is the oldest signal in our inventory. Given the width of the turning lanes, the radius of current curb returns are deficient. The signal standard at the northwest corner has been hit by turning truck trailers four (4) times within the most current three-year period. The west leg of the intersection needs widening and additional right-of-way has been acquired for this purpose. Your consideration in placing our projects in the upcoming two year HES funding cycle is appreciated. Sincerely, Director of Public Works/City ~Engineer RllK:kk R:I~m/V LTOLAND.4 *CITY/Cl)I~'~TY OF tK]A 4 · PROJECT LOCATION_ SOt]T~4 STATF AVF'r,IUi]i (~IASH~NGTON AYF'NUF') _ _ C,~, L CI,J L ATIED B Y LA_~R~R~L~ C, HECKED BY ~'. _~~.~ STREEI FROH MILL STREET TO 250 FEEl' SOUTH OF HASTINGS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PROVIDE A TW0-W^Y LEFT TURN L^NE. REMOVE EXISTING STRIPING AND PARKING AND THEN RESI'RIPE TO INSTALL NEW TRAFFIC DETECTION LOOPS TO MATCH THE NEW LANES, PROJECT PURPOSE COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS. PROVIDE SAFER TURNING MOVEMENTS AT INTERSECTION AND MID-BLOCk 'TOTAL COST (in $1OOOs) NUMBER OF LOCATIONS, 48 ADT (exist. all directions, in 1OOOs) 18 OR LENGTH IN MIL'ES ... 0.84..MILEs SAFETY EVALUATION 'coLUMN ® ,, ® .... ® ,, >o ~a. d~m a< o ~o - , , , , ,, , ,FATAL & 'INJURY 52 17.3 25% 4.3 15.1 10 654 , ~ _ ~ PDO 88 29.3 25g 7.3 2.1 10 154 ~, , ~ II TOT~8. 45.6 11.6 808 INITIAL ACCIDENT RATE /~/? = 4s,~® = 6.94' EXPECTED ACCIDENT RATE :REO'U CED REDUCTION FACTOR SAFETY INDEX fii' 808 ~ x/00 1683 ADJUSTED SAFETY ~.5/=-~A~x $/ = INDEX TWO-WAY LEFT-TURN LANES ON SO. STATE STREET FROM MILL STREET TO 250' NORTH OF HASTINGS AVENUE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Removal of existing striping and marking New striping and marking Replace traffic signal loops ConstrUction Cost Total Preliminary Engineering ConstrUction Engineering Total $11,000 $17,000 $14.0QQ $42,000 $ 4,000 $ 2,000 $48,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ESTABLISHING NO PARKING ZONES ON BOTH SIDES OF SOUTH STATE STREET FROM 200 FEET NORTH OF MILL STREET TO 250 FEET SOUTH OF HASTINGS AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council may by resolution designate portions of streets upon which the standing, parking, or stopping of vehicles is prohibited or restricted pursuant to Article 11, Chapter I, Division 8, of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works has received approval for a Hazard Elimination Safety Project from Cal-Trans to construct two-way left turn lanes on South State Street between Mill Street and Hastings Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City has received a report from W-Trans which recommends left turn lanes and protected left-turn traffic signal phasing at several of the intersections within the project area; and WHEREAS, there is insufficient width on South State Street to construct the two-way left turn lanes and to retain parking on South State Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ukiah City Council that a no parking zone be established on both sides of South State Street from 200 feet north of Mill Street to 250 feet south of Hastings Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is directed to remove existing limited parking signs and install "NO PARKING" signs and/or paint red curbs as required. This resolution shall become effective on the date the City Council awards a construction contract for the two-way left turn lane. /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED AND ADOPTED this by the following roll call vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk B :R F_..$ I &~1'ATE.NP day of 1996, Fred Schneiter, Mayor ITEM NO. 9d DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 101 OF THE UKIAH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO CITY MANAGER RESIDENCY Currently the Municipal Code prescribes that the City Manager will reside inside the City Limits within 180 days of appointment. This matter was discussed by the City Council relative to the previous City Manager with the understanding that the Code would be amended to eliminate the requirement. Because of the relatively small geographic area inside the City, housing within the corporate limits is not always viable. Generally, most locations in the valley are considered "Ukiah" and do not result in response time or "community member" concerns if the residence is outside the City's four square miles. Staff concurs with the Council's belief that residency within the City limits should not be mandated and recommends introduction of the ordinance to delete this requirement. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Introduce by title only the ordinance amending Chapter 3, Article 1, Section 101 of the Ukiah City Code relative to City Manager residency provisions ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Determine residency within the City limits is required and do not introduce ordinance. 2. Determine ordinance requires modifications, identify necessary changes, and introduce revised ordinance. Acct. No. (if NOT budgeted): N/A Appropriation Requested: N/A Citizen Advised: NA Requested by: Prepared by: Coordinated with: Attachments: Acct. No.' N/A Michael F. Harris, AICP, Assistant City Manager Candace Horsley, City Manager 1. Ordinance for Introduction, page 1. 2. Current Municipal Code section 101, page 2. Candace Horsley, City M!ager mfh:asrcc 8796crnord ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 1, OF THE UKIAH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO CITY MANAGER RESIDENCY The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows; SECTION ONE Section 101, of Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 1, of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: §101' RESIDENCE' Residence within the corporate city limits of Ukiah shall not be required as a condition of appointment or of continued employment of the City Manager. SECTION TWO This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. INTRODUCED BY TITLE ONLY this 7th day of August, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ADOPTED this day of ,1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Fred Schneiter, Mayor ATTEST: Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk mfh:re$ord CMRESID -t'- §100 §105 §100: OFFICE CREATED: The office of the City Manager of the City be, and the same is hereby created and established. The City Manager shall be appointed by the City Council wholly on the basis of his administrative and executive ability and qualifications and shall hold office for and during the pleasure of the City Council. (Ord. 509, §1, adopted 1956) §101: RESIDENCE: Residence in the City at the time of appointment of a City Manager shall not be required as a condition of the appointment, but within one hundred eighty (180) days thereafter the City Manager must become a resident of the City or the City Council shall declare the office of City Manager to be vacant. (Ord. 509, §2, adopted 1956) §102: ELIGIBILITY: No person elected as a Councilman of the City shall, subsequent to such election, be eligible for appointment as City Manager until one year has elapsed after such Councilmember shall have ceased to be a member of the City Council. (Ord. 509, §3, adopted 1956) §103: BOND: The City Manager shall furnish a corporate surety bond to be approved by the City Council in such sum as may be determined by the said City Council and shall be conditioned upon the faithful performance of the duties imposed upon the City Manager as herein prescribed. Any premiums for such bond shall be a proper charge against the City. (Ord. 509, §4, adopted 1956) §104: TEMPORARY MANAGER: The City Manager shall appoint, subject to the approval of the City Council, one of the other officers or department heads of the City to serve as Manager pro-tempore during any temporary absence or disability of the City Manager. In case of the absence or disability of the City Manager and his failure to so appoint a Manager pro-tempore, the City Council may designate some qualified City employee to perform the duties of the City Manager during the period of absence or disability of said City Manager, subject, however, to said person furnishing an appropriate surety bond conditioned upon faithful performance of the duties required to be performed as set forth in §103 of this Article. (Ord. 509, §5, adopted 1956) §105: COMPENSATION: The City Manager shall receive such compensation and expense allowances as the City Council shall from time to time determine and fix by resolution and said compensation and expenses shall be a proper charge against such funds of the City as the City Council shall designate. (Ord. 509, §6, adopted 1956) 1011 M.E.M.O.R.A.N.D.U.M DATE: TO: FROM: RE: August 5, 1996 Mayor Schneiter Councilmember Shoemaker Councilmember Wattenburger Councilmember Malone Councilmember Mastin Candace Horlsey, City Manager REVISION TO STAFF REPORT 9d - INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 101 OF THE UKIAH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO CITY MANAGER POSITION We have received a legal opinion from David Rapport that while imposing a time limit on City limit boundary for residence requirement on the City Manager is illegal, a milage limit is legally acceptable. Therefore, the attached proposed change to the Ordinance concerning the residency requirements for City Manager requires that the City Manager must reside within 15 road miles of the City limits of the City of Ukiah. This would allow residency in Redwood Valley or Hopland, but restrict residency in Willits or past Hopland. R: I \CM MRESIDENCY ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING SECTION 101 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE CONCERNING THE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT FOR CITY MANAGER. The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows: Findings: The City Council finds as follows: 1. The City Manager is the chief administrative officer of the City. 2. The City Manager is responsible for the effective performance of City employees, including in emergencies. 3. The City Manager represents the City after regular business hours and on week ends through his or her participation in community organizations and events. 4. In order to effectively perform these duties and carry out these responsiblities the City Manager must be in constant contact with the City and available on short notice in the event of emergencies. 5. The residency requirement set forth herein is intended to insure that the City Manager lives in sufficient proximity to the City that he or she can respond to emergencies, maintain sufficient personal contact with City staff and community members and organizations, and maintain familiarity with the physical circumstances and conditions in the City and its immediate surroundings. SECTION ONE Section 101 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: §101: RESIDENCE: The City Manager must reside within fifteen road miles of the city limits of the City of Ukiah. The City Manager must establish such residence within ninety days of his or her first appointment to the position by the City Council. SECTION TWO This Ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall become effective thirty (30) days after it is adopted. s:~u\ords96~manager.res August 2, 1996 Introduced by title only on following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Adopted on roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: , 1996, by the , 1996, by the following ATTEST: Fred Schneiter, Mayor Marge Giuntoli, City Clerk s:\u\ords961mana~er.res August 2, 1996 2