HomeMy WebLinkAbout74-271
2
$
4
$
$
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO. 74-27
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF UKIAH AUTHORIZING CCCJ GRANT
APPLICATION (OPERATION I.D.)
WHEREAS, the Ukiah City Council desires to undertake
a certain project designated Ukiah "Operation I.D." to be
funded in part from funds made available through the Omnibus
Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, PL 90-355, as
amended, PL 91-644, (Hereafter referred to as the Safe
Streets Act) administered by the California Council on Criminal
Justice (hereafter referred to as CCCJ).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City
of Ukiah is authorized, on its behalf, to submit the attached
application for grant for law enforcement purposes to CCCJ and
is authorized to execute on behalf of the City Council Council
of Ukiah the grant award contract for law enforcement purposes
including any extensions or amendments thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to pro-
vide all matching funds required for said project (including
any extension or amendment thereof) under the Safe Streets
Act and the rules and regulations of CCCJ and the Law Enforce-
ment Assistance Administration and that cash will be appropriated
as required thereby.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received here-
under shall not be used to supplant on-going law enforcement
expenditures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of November , 1973,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Weinkauf, Norgard, Buxton, Pearson,
Mayor Simpson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
City Clerk
J,~..~~:/ Y (~ ~ ~ I
1. Shor~ Titi'= -,- ~:~c;e::: (Do Not Exceed One 'Typed Line~
2ppii.-_ation 'is he'r_~by nlade For ~ g'rar:t under
S~.-ti,sn 301(~~
.~ ; of the OmnibJs C,'ime Control
and S~fe Streets ?,.: -f ~'~q fP:.- on_~:q~t n~
amended, ia the amount anJ for ~he purposes
set 'rur~h ~n this application.
UKIAH w .~,~ .... ', D
3. Regi on
2. Type of Appiicatie~' E]Previ°usly Letter of Intent No.
F~ Original ~,~ Revision E] Continuation of Grant No. A
4. CCCJ Support 5. Grantee 6. Total Project 7. Duration of This 8. Total
% 75
Contribution
% 25
$ ,$oo $
9. Applicant or Implementing Agency
or Governmental Unit:
(Name, address and telephone)
City Council
City of Ukiah
203 S. School Street
Ukiah, California 95482
(707) 462-2971
11. 'Financial Officer' (Name, title,
address and telephone)
G. Roy Brosig, Finance Director
City of Ukiah
203 S. School Street
ITkiah, California 95482
Cost Project Period Length of
Project
$ 9_,000 Dec, l, 197S-June 30, 1974
7 months
10. Project Director: (Name, title, address
and telephone)
Donn D. Saulsbury
Chief of Police
City of Ukiah
203 S. School Street
Ukiah, California 95482
(707) 462-3838
12. Official Authorized to Sign Application:
(Type name, title, address and telephone)
Jack Simpson, Mayor
City of Ukiah
203 S. School Street
Ukiah, CA 95v~82 (707) 462-2971
(707) 462 2971 Signature 'k-~/~<~d i~ ,~/~nr~..~_-~., .~-~-~ ..
13. Project Summary: Summarize, in approximat.qy 200 worc~s,,/ ~"mo~t important Parts Of the
statement oT projec~ plan presented in application, bW~efly covering project goals and
program methods, impact, scope and evaluation.
14 Index'
CCCJ Form 502 (Rev. 9/71)
- 1-
This is a crime ore'~ention project modelled after the recommendation in the
CCCJ booklet, ~'£eiective Crime Prevention Programs in California". The pro-
ject is necessizated by an increase in burglaries and decrease in the ratio
of property losses to recoveries. Objectives ~{ill be to decrease the total
number of burglaries, both residential and business, while at the sa=ne time
increasing the rztio of recovery to loss. Evaluation will be based on the
statistical data of burglaries committed and property recovered.
0
0
- 2-
CALIFORNIA COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL J[I=TICE
DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET
· MATCHING FUNDS
C~.~ ~GORY TOTAL GRANT FUHDS CASH I IN-KIHD
BUDGET
.....
16. Personal Services
, ,
A. Salaries
Reserves to assist aged, infirm
126 hours @ $4.67 per hour 587 587
B..Employee Benefits
,
TOTALS 587 587
17. Travel
None.
TOTALS
18. Consultant Services
, ,,
None.
·
IOTALS
DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET (CON'T)
~,nC~T SATESORY
TOTAL
i HATCH lNG FUNDS
GRANT I ' '
FUNDS CASH t tN-KIND
I t
O~e t'nc Expenses
5,000 Residential Burglary booklets 535 535
5,000 "Operation I.D." decals and
bumper stickers 640 140 500
20 engravers @ $8.50 ea. 170 170
sales tax (5% of $1,345) 68 68
·
_
,
, ,
·
TOTALS 1,413 913 5 O0
, ,,
, ~
~men t
NOne. ,,
·
TOTALS
, ~
_. 21. TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,000 1,500 500
92 Percent of Tota! Project Cost !00 75 25
m4--
23. $'~:d]e: ~iarrative' Begin below and add as many continuation pages
=,_~ - 5-B etc.~ as ,may be necessary to relate the items
b':d~eZ_:,: to project activities and complete the required Justification
a~ e'x:ianation of the project budget. Explain the sources the grantee
will uZi!ize for its matching contribution. Enumerate those proposed
expenciZure items that require prior approval, as specified in Bureau
~t Circular A-87 and in CCCJ Fiscal Affairs Manual, so
prior~no~oval. may be considered at the time application, is made.
16 (A) Salaries
Reserve officers will be paid for assisting the aged/infirm resident
to mark his items in the "Operation I.D." project. The salary is
the amount normally paid reservists by the City of Ukiah when they
perform special services for the city. The time necessary is estimated
by the Ukiah police chief.
$4.67 per hour X 126 hours = $ 587
19. Supplies and Operating Expenses
Cost of "Residential Burglary" booklets is that quoted to CCCJ by.
the State Printing~ Office. Purchase will be made there.
5,000 X $107 per thousand
= 535
Cost of "Operation I.D." bumper stickers, and decals was quoted by
the maker, Operation Identification, Inc., P. O. Box 767, Monterey
Park~ California. Purchase will be made there.
5~000 X $128 per thousand
Cost of engravers also was quoted by Operation Identification, Inc.
and purchase will be made from them.
20 X $8.50 each
'Sales tax (5% of $1,345)
640
170
68
- 5 - ·
PROJECT MONTH
1~997 iS5 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 6~n 9th 10th llth 12th
1~600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200-
0
·
I00~
25. Other,Sources of Funding -- None.
· FUNDS
i. DATE AGENCY REQUESTED REQUESTED STATUS OF REQUES. T
,
,
,,
'
~,,
o.
$
.
$
· . .
$
........
... · ~-- ~
,,,
2 7 · PKOBLE'! _SAC
The crime of burglary has steadily increased in the City of Ukiah from 1969
through 1972. Yhe current level of such crimes is unacceptable to the Police
Department end the !0,000-plus population of the community.
The increase is illustrated as follows:
Year Burglaries % Increase
1969 120 --
1970 159 32.5
1971 167 4.8
1972 173 3.6
The overall increase from 1969 to 1972 was 44.2 per cent over the 1969
figure.
Allied to the burglary increase has been a decline in overall losses re-
covered, of which burglaries are a significant part. In 1969, Ukiah's re-
covery rate was 63 per cent. By 1972, this had declined to 44 per cent.
The Ukiah Police Department, prior to this time, has lacked the resources
with which to conduct an effective burglary prevention project.
28. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
Reduce burglaries in the City of Ukiah during 1974 to 5 per cent less
than the 1972 total.
B. Increase the recovery rate of property loss to 50 per cent during
¢~lendar 1974.
29. APPROACH FOR ACHIEVING THE OBJECTIVES
The Ukiah Police Department will establish an "Operation Identification"
program as described in the CCCJ booklet "Selective Crime Prevention Pro-
grams in California". Pertinent to the objectives are-
Objective A --'Reduce burglaries in the City of Ukiah during 1974 to 5 per
cent less than the 1972 total.
This objective will be addressed by:
1o Purchase of engravers for use by residents.,to engrave their driver's
license number on items of property at no cost to them; dissemination
of the CCCJ booklet "Residential Burglary and What to do About It" to
all users of the engravers; dissemination of Operation I.D. decal
for marking homes participating, and bumper stickers for vehicles in
~hich equipment has been marked; assistance of reserve officers for
t~.e aged and infirm; and a publicity campaign designed to inform the
public of the program (and hopefully the would-be burglar); and
2. Dissenination of the booklet mentioned in (1) above to businesses,
to.gat::er with information urging them to harden the business burglary
target through the installation of proper security devices.
Objective B -- increase the recovery rate of property loss to 50 per cent
during calendar 1974.
This objective will be addressed by the property identification engrav-
ing described above.
30. STATEMENT OF WORK AND WORK SCHEDULE
Tasks to be undertaken will include:
A. Purchase engravers, booklets, bumper stickers and decals -- 30 days.
B. Delivery of items in (A) -- 30 days.
C. Publicity campaign -- 30 days and continuing.
'%oan engravers and disseminate materials -- continuing.
E. Harden business burglary targets -- continuing.
T~sk A
Task
Task
Task D
Task E
P..roject Task Schedule
Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June
31 PROJECT EVALUATION
· ,
~valuation will be performed by the Ukiah Police Chief, utilizing the follow-
ing data by objective:
Objective A -- Reduce burglaries in the City of Ukiah during 1974 to 5 per
cent less than the 1972 total.
Comparison of 1974 calendar year burglary totals compared to the 1972
figure. The 1972 total is 173. A reduction of 5 per cent should show
a I~74 total of 164.
Objective 5 -- increase the recovery rate of property loss to 50 per cent during
calendar 1~7i.
Co~.pariscn of losses to recoveries should decrease by 50 per cent.
NOTICE OF,Ir*T~-,,T
THIS FORq 5F~-'/ES ^$ TH-2 NO1 ~CE O: z:u~LE1:0-1 ~,',DE'. ,E CALIFORNIA
E] STATE CLEAFIINGHOU5
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
OFFICE OF INTERGC'/FRNM£NTAL
~4 A,';ACE 1'4 EH T
1400 lOTH STREET -ROOM
$.~.CR.~P~ENTO, CALiFORnIA 958;4
(916) 445-061 3
(NOTIFY BOTH)
r-] ,MET ROPOLITAN CLEARINGHOUSE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
iSTAT~ CLEARINGHOUSE.
SEE INSTRUCTIONS Oft ~EVEPSE $1CE
POHSOR (OR AGENCY RrsPoNSI'3LE FOR R:PORT) (12-4.5)
City of Ukiah
',P. OJECT TITLE (12-7I)
Ukiah "Operation I.D."
TRANSACTION
DIVISION
Police Department
ADD,~C $S (; 2-45) )CITY
203 S. School Street J ITkiah
CONTACT FS:P...90.'I (12-35; )TITLe:' (37-65)
Dorm. g. Saulsbury J Chief of Police
(12-7l) PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, BENEFICIARIES
This is a crime prevention pro~ect end is necessitated by an increase
12-71}
in burglaries and decrease in the ratio of property losses to recov-
(~2-71) '
eries. Objectives will be to decrease the total number of bur~,laries,
(12-71)
both residential and business~ while at the same time increasin~ the
ratio of recovery to loss.
(12-71)
DATE THIS FOR,',,I .%UO~J.I'FTED (75-80)
~o. 10 ~*. 23 ,7~.~.. 73
AGENCY ACTION DATE (sc.K ltl.ST ) {75-80;
COUNTY (61-75)
Mendocino
IAREA CODE (66-68) Jm~o~F. (69-75)
707 ! 462-3838
ZiP CODE (-?,-}-3 I )
95482
'EXT. (76-80}
ON THESE 6 LINES CAPSULIZE THE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION. YOU ARE
ENCOURAGED TO ATTACH ADDITION-
AL INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT
'FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE REVIEW-
ER. IF YOU DO, ]'HE STATE CLEAR-
INGHOUSE WiLL NEED 2.5 COPIES
OF ANY ATTACHMENTS. PLEASE
CHECK WITH THE METROPOLITAN
CLEARINGHOUSE FOR THEIR SUB-
MISSION REQUIREMENTS.
PROJECT LOCATIO~ COUNTY (46-79)
~endocino
PROJECT LOCATION CITY (12-45)
Ukiah
FEDERAL FUNDS J MATCHING FLJ.HDS j(43-$6) OTHER
_C-~t'T, (12-20~ OTHER (21-29) 5!.~TE (30-38) J , LOCAL (39-47) ,NON-FEDERAL FUNDS
2,OOO
,~CE OF OTHER FROg"At FU,D' (12-34)JFEO. CATALOG NO. JSOURCE OF STATE MATCH C35-57)
t
FUNDING AGENCY PROGRAm4 TITLE (12-80) IFEOERAL CATALOG
Enforc~ent Assistance--Improving & StrenAthenin~ Law Enforc~ent '[ 16.502
DiNG AGENCY NAME (12-45)
CONGRESSIONAL OtSTR:CT SENATE DISTRICT ASSEMBLY DIST~ICT
(57-65)
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE OF OTHER NON-FED. FUNDS
,,
TYPE OF ACTION: ~j12 NEW
r-j I,.R MODIFICATION IN CURRENT
GRANT - CUR. SCM. NO.
22 CONTINUATION GRANT
SCH. NO. FROM PRE. YR.
31 RESUSMITTAL N~: A PRE
APPLICATION -
' ' PRE. SCH. 1%'O.
(14-21)
(25-30)
· (40-45) . 6 mO.I~ONg"'.. -Ay - YEAI~
~$'0 ND S DURATION MOS.
i-. ·
i EST. PROJECT START
(49-.34) ~.-tON - OAf - YEAR
EST. PROJECT DURATION 6 ~O. MO5.
;PROJECT SUBJECT TO REVIb~W UNDER:
'~'tH'ECK AS 1.4ANY AS APPROPRIATE)
~ U.S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
58
CtRCULAR A-95
59 MODEL CITIES PLANNED VARIATION
60 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT.AL POLICY ACT
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OLIALITY ACT
62 SUBDIVISION REVIEW (SECTION 11550.I OF
BUSINESS &. PROFESSIONS COOE)
, ..
63 STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (SEC. 0911)
HEALTH RELATED, (SEC. 4:37.5 OF HEALTH
AND SAFETY CODE)
O 65 LEASE OF STATE LANDS
BI66 OTHER:
ENVIRONMENTAL OOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIRED?
YES [~ 12 biO 0 13
IF CROJECT IS PHYSICAL IN NATURE OR R-ZOuI~ES Aft
ENVIEONMCNTAL DOCU,~IENT, LIST TIlE U.S. GEOLOGICAL
'SURVEY QUADRANGLE MAP IN WHICH TIlE PROJECT IS
LOCATED.
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DOES YOUR AGEHCY HAVE A CIVIL RIGIiTS AFFIRMATIVE
ACTION POLICY ArID PLAN?
,'~s Eq ~ NO EI~"
· WILL THE PROJECT REQUIRE RELOCATION?
IF YES -
.~_ 1,$ ENVIPONMEFITAI. ]k~PACT STATEL~--_NT (REPORT) ATTACHED
A~P~O ( t~4AI ELY
YES 0 69 NO j~ 70
/
:
IF NO -
·
[~25 FEDERAL PEOGP. A~4 DOES N~)T REQUIRE AN ENVIRONktENTAL DOCUMEN'
[--]25 UHDER STATE CATEGORI, CAL EXEf.lPl ION,
PROJECT
EXEkaF'T
CLASS
(27-28)
AGENCIES WITH WHIC~ C3.~PUbIAT;O;4 NAS BEEN. ESTAELISHEO.
A-1
CITY OF UKIAH
POLiCE DE~PAR%:MENT
203 S. School Street
Ukiah, California 95482
(707) 462-3838
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISAL
For: Ukiah "Operation I.D."
To- All Interested Government Agencies and Public Groups
The following information is prepared in response to the Law Enforcement
Assistance Administration's need for environmental impact statements. This
appraisal of proposed agency action based upon the project application sum-
mary references guidelines contained in LEAA Memorandum to State Planning
Agencies No. 31, dated March 2, 1972.
Project Summary:
This is a crime prevention project modelled after the recommendation in the
CCCJ booklet, '~Selective Crime Prevention Programs in California". The pro-
j~ct is necessitated by an increase in burglaries and decrease in the ratio
of property losses to. recoveries. Objectives will be to decrease the total
number of burglaries, both residential and business, while at the same time
increasing the ratio of recovery to loss. Evaluation will be based on the
· tatistical data of burglaries committed and property recovered.
An appraisal of the environmental impact of this project gives the project
director reason to believe that there will be positive advantages, if there
is to be an impact at all. Considering noise levels, aesthetic, and historic
or recreational aspects of this project's impact, there will be negligible
effect upon the environment. The ecological balance of land or water areas,
or living patterns of non-htnnan species will be unaffected by the activities
of this project.
gx~ept as this assessment of environmental impact contributes to law enforce-
ment awareness, it is concluded that there will be no environmental impact.
~.hief of P~d~lice
10/23/73
B-1
CITY OF UKIAH
POLICE D E?ARTMENT
203 S. School Street
Ukiah, California 95482
(707) 462-3838
ENVIRONMENTAL I>iPACT STAT~tENT
NEGATIVE IMPACT STAT~iENT
To: All Interested Government Agencies and Public Groups
In accord with the procedures for the preparation of environmental impact
statements, an environmental assessment has been performed on the proposed
agency action:
Title: Ukiah "Operation I.D."
Project Surmnary:
This is a crime prevention project modelled after the recommendation in the
CCCJ booklet, "Selective Crime Prevention Programs in California". The pro-
ject is necessitated by an increase in burglaries and decrease in the ratio
of property losses to recoveries. Objectives will be to decrease the total
number of burglaries, both residential and business, while at the same time
increasing the ratio of recovery to loss. Evaluation will be based on the
statistical data of burglaries committed and property recovered.
The assessment process did not indicate significant environmental impact
from the proposed action. The assessment process referenced the guidelines
for preparing negative environmental impact statements contained in CCCJ
memorandum dated May 19, 1972 from Glenn Walker, Chief, Planning Division,
to regional planning directors. Consequently, an. environmental impact state-
ment will not be prepared.
An environmental impact appraisal, which summarizes the assessment and the
reasons why a statement is not required, is on file at the above office and
will be available for public scrutiny upon request.
~)/23/73