Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout74-271 2 $ 4 $ $ ? 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 74-27 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AUTHORIZING CCCJ GRANT APPLICATION (OPERATION I.D.) WHEREAS, the Ukiah City Council desires to undertake a certain project designated Ukiah "Operation I.D." to be funded in part from funds made available through the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, PL 90-355, as amended, PL 91-644, (Hereafter referred to as the Safe Streets Act) administered by the California Council on Criminal Justice (hereafter referred to as CCCJ). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Ukiah is authorized, on its behalf, to submit the attached application for grant for law enforcement purposes to CCCJ and is authorized to execute on behalf of the City Council Council of Ukiah the grant award contract for law enforcement purposes including any extensions or amendments thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to pro- vide all matching funds required for said project (including any extension or amendment thereof) under the Safe Streets Act and the rules and regulations of CCCJ and the Law Enforce- ment Assistance Administration and that cash will be appropriated as required thereby. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received here- under shall not be used to supplant on-going law enforcement expenditures. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of November , 1973, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Weinkauf, Norgard, Buxton, Pearson, Mayor Simpson NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: City Clerk J,~..~~:/ Y (~ ~ ~ I 1. Shor~ Titi'= -,- ~:~c;e::: (Do Not Exceed One 'Typed Line~ 2ppii.-_ation 'is he'r_~by nlade For ~ g'rar:t under S~.-ti,sn 301(~~ .~ ; of the OmnibJs C,'ime Control and S~fe Streets ?,.: -f ~'~q fP:.- on_~:q~t n~ amended, ia the amount anJ for ~he purposes set 'rur~h ~n this application. UKIAH w .~,~ .... ', D 3. Regi on 2. Type of Appiicatie~' E]Previ°usly Letter of Intent No. F~ Original ~,~ Revision E] Continuation of Grant No. A 4. CCCJ Support 5. Grantee 6. Total Project 7. Duration of This 8. Total % 75 Contribution % 25 $ ,$oo $ 9. Applicant or Implementing Agency or Governmental Unit: (Name, address and telephone) City Council City of Ukiah 203 S. School Street Ukiah, California 95482 (707) 462-2971 11. 'Financial Officer' (Name, title, address and telephone) G. Roy Brosig, Finance Director City of Ukiah 203 S. School Street ITkiah, California 95482 Cost Project Period Length of Project $ 9_,000 Dec, l, 197S-June 30, 1974 7 months 10. Project Director: (Name, title, address and telephone) Donn D. Saulsbury Chief of Police City of Ukiah 203 S. School Street Ukiah, California 95482 (707) 462-3838 12. Official Authorized to Sign Application: (Type name, title, address and telephone) Jack Simpson, Mayor City of Ukiah 203 S. School Street Ukiah, CA 95v~82 (707) 462-2971 (707) 462 2971 Signature 'k-~/~<~d i~ ,~/~nr~..~_-~., .~-~-~ .. 13. Project Summary: Summarize, in approximat.qy 200 worc~s,,/ ~"mo~t important Parts Of the statement oT projec~ plan presented in application, bW~efly covering project goals and program methods, impact, scope and evaluation. 14 Index' CCCJ Form 502 (Rev. 9/71) - 1- This is a crime ore'~ention project modelled after the recommendation in the CCCJ booklet, ~'£eiective Crime Prevention Programs in California". The pro- ject is necessizated by an increase in burglaries and decrease in the ratio of property losses to recoveries. Objectives ~{ill be to decrease the total number of burglaries, both residential and business, while at the sa=ne time increasing the rztio of recovery to loss. Evaluation will be based on the statistical data of burglaries committed and property recovered. 0 0 - 2- CALIFORNIA COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL J[I=TICE DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET · MATCHING FUNDS C~.~ ~GORY TOTAL GRANT FUHDS CASH I IN-KIHD BUDGET ..... 16. Personal Services , , A. Salaries Reserves to assist aged, infirm 126 hours @ $4.67 per hour 587 587 B..Employee Benefits , TOTALS 587 587 17. Travel None. TOTALS 18. Consultant Services , ,, None. · IOTALS DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET (CON'T) ~,nC~T SATESORY TOTAL i HATCH lNG FUNDS GRANT I ' ' FUNDS CASH t tN-KIND I t O~e t'nc Expenses 5,000 Residential Burglary booklets 535 535 5,000 "Operation I.D." decals and bumper stickers 640 140 500 20 engravers @ $8.50 ea. 170 170 sales tax (5% of $1,345) 68 68 · _ , , , · TOTALS 1,413 913 5 O0 , ,, , ~ ~men t NOne. ,, · TOTALS , ~ _. 21. TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,000 1,500 500 92 Percent of Tota! Project Cost !00 75 25 m4-- 23. $'~:d]e: ~iarrative' Begin below and add as many continuation pages =,_~ - 5-B etc.~ as ,may be necessary to relate the items b':d~eZ_:,: to project activities and complete the required Justification a~ e'x:ianation of the project budget. Explain the sources the grantee will uZi!ize for its matching contribution. Enumerate those proposed expenciZure items that require prior approval, as specified in Bureau ~t Circular A-87 and in CCCJ Fiscal Affairs Manual, so prior~no~oval. may be considered at the time application, is made. 16 (A) Salaries Reserve officers will be paid for assisting the aged/infirm resident to mark his items in the "Operation I.D." project. The salary is the amount normally paid reservists by the City of Ukiah when they perform special services for the city. The time necessary is estimated by the Ukiah police chief. $4.67 per hour X 126 hours = $ 587 19. Supplies and Operating Expenses Cost of "Residential Burglary" booklets is that quoted to CCCJ by. the State Printing~ Office. Purchase will be made there. 5,000 X $107 per thousand = 535 Cost of "Operation I.D." bumper stickers, and decals was quoted by the maker, Operation Identification, Inc., P. O. Box 767, Monterey Park~ California. Purchase will be made there. 5~000 X $128 per thousand Cost of engravers also was quoted by Operation Identification, Inc. and purchase will be made from them. 20 X $8.50 each 'Sales tax (5% of $1,345) 640 170 68 - 5 - · PROJECT MONTH 1~997 iS5 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 6~n 9th 10th llth 12th 1~600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200- 0 · I00~ 25. Other,Sources of Funding -- None. · FUNDS i. DATE AGENCY REQUESTED REQUESTED STATUS OF REQUES. T , , ,, ' ~,, o. $ . $ · . . $ ........ ... · ~-- ~ ,,, 2 7 · PKOBLE'! _SAC The crime of burglary has steadily increased in the City of Ukiah from 1969 through 1972. Yhe current level of such crimes is unacceptable to the Police Department end the !0,000-plus population of the community. The increase is illustrated as follows: Year Burglaries % Increase 1969 120 -- 1970 159 32.5 1971 167 4.8 1972 173 3.6 The overall increase from 1969 to 1972 was 44.2 per cent over the 1969 figure. Allied to the burglary increase has been a decline in overall losses re- covered, of which burglaries are a significant part. In 1969, Ukiah's re- covery rate was 63 per cent. By 1972, this had declined to 44 per cent. The Ukiah Police Department, prior to this time, has lacked the resources with which to conduct an effective burglary prevention project. 28. PROJECT OBJECTIVES Reduce burglaries in the City of Ukiah during 1974 to 5 per cent less than the 1972 total. B. Increase the recovery rate of property loss to 50 per cent during ¢~lendar 1974. 29. APPROACH FOR ACHIEVING THE OBJECTIVES The Ukiah Police Department will establish an "Operation Identification" program as described in the CCCJ booklet "Selective Crime Prevention Pro- grams in California". Pertinent to the objectives are- Objective A --'Reduce burglaries in the City of Ukiah during 1974 to 5 per cent less than the 1972 total. This objective will be addressed by: 1o Purchase of engravers for use by residents.,to engrave their driver's license number on items of property at no cost to them; dissemination of the CCCJ booklet "Residential Burglary and What to do About It" to all users of the engravers; dissemination of Operation I.D. decal for marking homes participating, and bumper stickers for vehicles in ~hich equipment has been marked; assistance of reserve officers for t~.e aged and infirm; and a publicity campaign designed to inform the public of the program (and hopefully the would-be burglar); and 2. Dissenination of the booklet mentioned in (1) above to businesses, to.gat::er with information urging them to harden the business burglary target through the installation of proper security devices. Objective B -- increase the recovery rate of property loss to 50 per cent during calendar 1974. This objective will be addressed by the property identification engrav- ing described above. 30. STATEMENT OF WORK AND WORK SCHEDULE Tasks to be undertaken will include: A. Purchase engravers, booklets, bumper stickers and decals -- 30 days. B. Delivery of items in (A) -- 30 days. C. Publicity campaign -- 30 days and continuing. '%oan engravers and disseminate materials -- continuing. E. Harden business burglary targets -- continuing. T~sk A Task Task Task D Task E P..roject Task Schedule Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June 31 PROJECT EVALUATION · , ~valuation will be performed by the Ukiah Police Chief, utilizing the follow- ing data by objective: Objective A -- Reduce burglaries in the City of Ukiah during 1974 to 5 per cent less than the 1972 total. Comparison of 1974 calendar year burglary totals compared to the 1972 figure. The 1972 total is 173. A reduction of 5 per cent should show a I~74 total of 164. Objective 5 -- increase the recovery rate of property loss to 50 per cent during calendar 1~7i. Co~.pariscn of losses to recoveries should decrease by 50 per cent. NOTICE OF,Ir*T~-,,T THIS FORq 5F~-'/ES ^$ TH-2 NO1 ~CE O: z:u~LE1:0-1 ~,',DE'. ,E CALIFORNIA E] STATE CLEAFIINGHOU5 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF INTERGC'/FRNM£NTAL ~4 A,';ACE 1'4 EH T 1400 lOTH STREET -ROOM $.~.CR.~P~ENTO, CALiFORnIA 958;4 (916) 445-061 3 (NOTIFY BOTH) r-] ,MET ROPOLITAN CLEARINGHOUSE STATE OF CALIFORNIA iSTAT~ CLEARINGHOUSE. SEE INSTRUCTIONS Oft ~EVEPSE $1CE POHSOR (OR AGENCY RrsPoNSI'3LE FOR R:PORT) (12-4.5) City of Ukiah ',P. OJECT TITLE (12-7I) Ukiah "Operation I.D." TRANSACTION DIVISION Police Department ADD,~C $S (; 2-45) )CITY 203 S. School Street J ITkiah CONTACT FS:P...90.'I (12-35; )TITLe:' (37-65) Dorm. g. Saulsbury J Chief of Police (12-7l) PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, BENEFICIARIES This is a crime prevention pro~ect end is necessitated by an increase 12-71} in burglaries and decrease in the ratio of property losses to recov- (~2-71) ' eries. Objectives will be to decrease the total number of bur~,laries, (12-71) both residential and business~ while at the same time increasin~ the ratio of recovery to loss. (12-71) DATE THIS FOR,',,I .%UO~J.I'FTED (75-80) ~o. 10 ~*. 23 ,7~.~.. 73 AGENCY ACTION DATE (sc.K ltl.ST ) {75-80; COUNTY (61-75) Mendocino IAREA CODE (66-68) Jm~o~F. (69-75) 707 ! 462-3838 ZiP CODE (-?,-}-3 I ) 95482 'EXT. (76-80} ON THESE 6 LINES CAPSULIZE THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO ATTACH ADDITION- AL INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT 'FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE REVIEW- ER. IF YOU DO, ]'HE STATE CLEAR- INGHOUSE WiLL NEED 2.5 COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS. PLEASE CHECK WITH THE METROPOLITAN CLEARINGHOUSE FOR THEIR SUB- MISSION REQUIREMENTS. PROJECT LOCATIO~ COUNTY (46-79) ~endocino PROJECT LOCATION CITY (12-45) Ukiah FEDERAL FUNDS J MATCHING FLJ.HDS j(43-$6) OTHER _C-~t'T, (12-20~ OTHER (21-29) 5!.~TE (30-38) J , LOCAL (39-47) ,NON-FEDERAL FUNDS 2,OOO ,~CE OF OTHER FROg"At FU,D' (12-34)JFEO. CATALOG NO. JSOURCE OF STATE MATCH C35-57) t FUNDING AGENCY PROGRAm4 TITLE (12-80) IFEOERAL CATALOG Enforc~ent Assistance--Improving & StrenAthenin~ Law Enforc~ent '[ 16.502 DiNG AGENCY NAME (12-45) CONGRESSIONAL OtSTR:CT SENATE DISTRICT ASSEMBLY DIST~ICT (57-65) TOTAL FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER NON-FED. FUNDS ,, TYPE OF ACTION: ~j12 NEW r-j I,.R MODIFICATION IN CURRENT GRANT - CUR. SCM. NO. 22 CONTINUATION GRANT SCH. NO. FROM PRE. YR. 31 RESUSMITTAL N~: A PRE APPLICATION - ' ' PRE. SCH. 1%'O. (14-21) (25-30) · (40-45) . 6 mO.I~ONg"'.. -Ay - YEAI~ ~$'0 ND S DURATION MOS. i-. · i EST. PROJECT START (49-.34) ~.-tON - OAf - YEAR EST. PROJECT DURATION 6 ~O. MO5. ;PROJECT SUBJECT TO REVIb~W UNDER: '~'tH'ECK AS 1.4ANY AS APPROPRIATE) ~ U.S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 58 CtRCULAR A-95 59 MODEL CITIES PLANNED VARIATION 60 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT.AL POLICY ACT CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OLIALITY ACT 62 SUBDIVISION REVIEW (SECTION 11550.I OF BUSINESS &. PROFESSIONS COOE) , .. 63 STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (SEC. 0911) HEALTH RELATED, (SEC. 4:37.5 OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE) O 65 LEASE OF STATE LANDS BI66 OTHER: ENVIRONMENTAL OOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIRED? YES [~ 12 biO 0 13 IF CROJECT IS PHYSICAL IN NATURE OR R-ZOuI~ES Aft ENVIEONMCNTAL DOCU,~IENT, LIST TIlE U.S. GEOLOGICAL 'SURVEY QUADRANGLE MAP IN WHICH TIlE PROJECT IS LOCATED. I. 2. 3. 4. 5. DOES YOUR AGEHCY HAVE A CIVIL RIGIiTS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY ArID PLAN? ,'~s Eq ~ NO EI~" · WILL THE PROJECT REQUIRE RELOCATION? IF YES - .~_ 1,$ ENVIPONMEFITAI. ]k~PACT STATEL~--_NT (REPORT) ATTACHED A~P~O ( t~4AI ELY YES 0 69 NO j~ 70 / : IF NO - · [~25 FEDERAL PEOGP. A~4 DOES N~)T REQUIRE AN ENVIRONktENTAL DOCUMEN' [--]25 UHDER STATE CATEGORI, CAL EXEf.lPl ION, PROJECT EXEkaF'T CLASS (27-28) AGENCIES WITH WHIC~ C3.~PUbIAT;O;4 NAS BEEN. ESTAELISHEO. A-1 CITY OF UKIAH POLiCE DE~PAR%:MENT 203 S. School Street Ukiah, California 95482 (707) 462-3838 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISAL For: Ukiah "Operation I.D." To- All Interested Government Agencies and Public Groups The following information is prepared in response to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration's need for environmental impact statements. This appraisal of proposed agency action based upon the project application sum- mary references guidelines contained in LEAA Memorandum to State Planning Agencies No. 31, dated March 2, 1972. Project Summary: This is a crime prevention project modelled after the recommendation in the CCCJ booklet, '~Selective Crime Prevention Programs in California". The pro- j~ct is necessitated by an increase in burglaries and decrease in the ratio of property losses to. recoveries. Objectives will be to decrease the total number of burglaries, both residential and business, while at the same time increasing the ratio of recovery to loss. Evaluation will be based on the · tatistical data of burglaries committed and property recovered. An appraisal of the environmental impact of this project gives the project director reason to believe that there will be positive advantages, if there is to be an impact at all. Considering noise levels, aesthetic, and historic or recreational aspects of this project's impact, there will be negligible effect upon the environment. The ecological balance of land or water areas, or living patterns of non-htnnan species will be unaffected by the activities of this project. gx~ept as this assessment of environmental impact contributes to law enforce- ment awareness, it is concluded that there will be no environmental impact. ~.hief of P~d~lice 10/23/73 B-1 CITY OF UKIAH POLICE D E?ARTMENT 203 S. School Street Ukiah, California 95482 (707) 462-3838 ENVIRONMENTAL I>iPACT STAT~tENT NEGATIVE IMPACT STAT~iENT To: All Interested Government Agencies and Public Groups In accord with the procedures for the preparation of environmental impact statements, an environmental assessment has been performed on the proposed agency action: Title: Ukiah "Operation I.D." Project Surmnary: This is a crime prevention project modelled after the recommendation in the CCCJ booklet, "Selective Crime Prevention Programs in California". The pro- ject is necessitated by an increase in burglaries and decrease in the ratio of property losses to recoveries. Objectives will be to decrease the total number of burglaries, both residential and business, while at the same time increasing the ratio of recovery to loss. Evaluation will be based on the statistical data of burglaries committed and property recovered. The assessment process did not indicate significant environmental impact from the proposed action. The assessment process referenced the guidelines for preparing negative environmental impact statements contained in CCCJ memorandum dated May 19, 1972 from Glenn Walker, Chief, Planning Division, to regional planning directors. Consequently, an. environmental impact state- ment will not be prepared. An environmental impact appraisal, which summarizes the assessment and the reasons why a statement is not required, is on file at the above office and will be available for public scrutiny upon request. ~)/23/73