The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About69-231 Z8 19 20 29 3O RESOLUTION NO. 69-23 RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE ARLO Lo KULLMAN TO RESOL The City Counci 1 of the City VE: of Ukiah does hereby An application for variance having been duly presented and filed, the Planning Commission of the City of Ukiah having duly held a public hearing, taken evidence, and made and fi led its recommendations, and the City Counci 1 of the City of Ukiah, having duly considered the recommendations of the Planning Commission; The City Council hereby finds that the proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Ukiah and meets the conditions thereof; and Does hereby grant Variance to permit a mob i ]e home park on Street, North of East Gobbi Stre,e, those conditions recommended Planning Commission of the City o Application No. 69-2 For Variance attached and incorporated herein No. 69-2 to Arlo L. Kuliman the west si de of Leslie l~ Zoned CMs. ubj~ect to solution ~o 6~-z+ of the f Ukiah Recommending Grantin.?. II , a true copy of which is by reference. If any condition set forth is violated, or if any re- qui red approval is not obtained, then this variance sha]l be null and void, otherwise to continue in full force and effect indefinitely and to run w'i th the land. This va r iance is granted only for the spec'ific purposes set forth above, and shall not L}e construed as e]iminating or modifying any buildin9 use or zone requirements except as to such specific purposes. ted this 2nd day of October , 1968. ATTEST: ACCEPTANCE I, the undersigned applicant, have read the foregoing and to all terms and conditions J~'AYOR (PRO.-I~'EM)~- '(/"/., "' ", do hereby certify that I that I accept such variance subject contained therein. P, ESOLUTION NOo ;~9'~ OF 'THE PLANNING COM, M~SS;ON OF THE C~T¥ OF UK~AH~ RECONICE#DtN~ ~TtN~ APPL ~ CAT~ ON NO~ ~,~2 FOR V~,~I :.~E THE PLANNING CO~,~ ii SS ~ ON OF T~E C~T¥ OF UM,~AH DOES HER, E~Y RESOLVE: ~HEREAS~ Application No~ 6~-~ of A~ L. ~~ has been duly considered~.b~y the Commission at a duly noticed ¢wg~lmr meeting held on Sept~,I~er ~, I~,~ ~ evidence taken and considered, and arguments, if any~ hear:d~ NOW'~ TH E: RE FO RE .~ The Piann~ng Commission does hereby FIND: Th~at the al legat~ons,~ and each of them~ contained in the applicaI tio;~ are '' true.~ except~ ~:'~'~ 2~ That the action requested ]s '" in harmony with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Uk]ah and applicable amendments thereto~ The Planning Commission does hereby ~ETER.~NE: ?hat Application Noo :~):~-:: be subject to the follow~ng: 1o Standard Conditions Nos° i ~' r~ ...~ cont,~ined in the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Planning Commission on file with the Cterk shall apply i'n addition to any special conditions set forth below° 2o The special conditions l~sted below shall apply: PASSED AND ADOPTED by the following vote~ AYES,~ NOES~ ~¢ ne A~SENTo Dated: Clerk Cha i rman Form 6-PC-O765 CERTIFICATION Hary E. Garth I, l~iS~iS~l~Xl~~, Clerk of the City of Ukiah Planning Commission, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true copy of Resolution ,%. 69-/+ adopted by the said Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof on the .19th day of Segtember , 196 8 .... , the same as appears of r~cord in my office. Plafn'ir~g ??(~m'J~sion Clerk City of Ukiah MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 1968 TO: Planning Commission FRON: A. S. Kruth, Director of Public Works Subject: Zone ~Variance Application No. 69-2 to....Construct. Mobile Park in CM .District wi'th Reduced Sidej,,,,yards,, and,,"?ron~ Yards Set Backs __ We have reviewed the application in questionnaire furnished by Applicant and wish to make the following observations and recommendations: 0BSERVATI 0NS: l) The Applicant's proposed plot plan contemplates 55 trailers. No setback is provided from adjacent properties or from Leslie Street. 2) The Variance requested is for the same property for which a previous variance was granted for a convalescent hospital. This Variance has now expired. 3) A variance was '~ alSo~ grmuted to the Elks Club on property across Leslie Street to the east. $) To the south of the proposed Elks Club Development is an apartment complex approximately opposite the proposed entrance to the Park. There are adequate utility facilities available to service the proposed development. Street Improvements are now constructed except for sidewalk. The Applicant does not propose construc- tion of the sidewalk. 6) A "wire fence" is proposed around the property. No special treatment for landscaping or screening is proposed in him application. 7) CM Zoning requires a $0 foot setback in the front area together with special landscaping and fencing. Side and rear yards require 15 foot setbacks. ~ / ~.~- Planning Commission Page two From our review of the application we have made the following con- clusions: l) The dimensions of the property makes its development under the CM Zone difficult, and special consideration may be warranted due tothe setback requirements. In our opinion, mobile home park usage is generally compatible with present uses in the area provided a good development is constructed and would not adversely affect property values in the area. Applicant has proposed a maximum usage of the property with no proposal in his application to screen, landscape or otherwise enhance the appearance of the development from the street or adjacent properties° In view of our studies, we recommend the following: We recommend that if the Planning Commission after public hearing finds the facts to favor granting the requested variance that the following minimum requirements be made a part of any variance which may be granted. b) Standard Conditions 1 through 9 with the exception that additional time may be permitted for stage construction upon approval of the Planning Commission. The 40 foot front setback area be reduced to 10 foot along Leslie Street with sui'table landscaping planted and maintained therein during the life of the vari anc e. c) Six foot high solid fences shall be constructed behind the l0 foot setback area and along all exterior boundaries of the property. Fences are to be of good material and pleasing in appearance. d~) Concrete walk shall be installed along entire Leslie Street frontage. e) No ~obile Home or building shall be located closer than ~ feet from side or rear property lines. f) Roadways and Parking areas within the mobile home concrete paving. ~. / /