HomeMy WebLinkAbout54-01PROPOSED ANNEIA.TION O? .UNINHA~I~D TE~Ri.TORY' T.0 ~E CITY OF' UKIA~
.
WHEREAE~ ~he Cl~ Couneil of ~he Cit~ of 'Uktah bas re,solved a w~it-
ten petition reque.s~ing annexation e.f ee~ta~i.a lands he~e. inafter
particularly described, by whleh .Peti'tie~. it is p~opose$ that eer-
rain territory 'be annexed te ~h'e Cit~ e.f ~ah a~ ~~Ited ter-
rito~y,' which said Petition. ia si~d b~. ~-~vnere ~£ m'~ less than
one-fourth of the land in the te~ri~'". P~-po~ed t~ be a~xed by ' '
a~ea ~d by value, as sho~ on ~ last ~q/~'~'[~ed assessm~ ~o11~...~
the Oo~ty of'Mendoclno', '8~.ate of ~alife'~nia, in which
te~ le sit~te~, ~he Oit7 C~ctl cf.'the C~.ty of ~ah
resolve as follows.:' ~ ~ ...
That a~ the hour of 8 o~'c!cek F:'~ on ~.e ~~-d~
3, 'at ~he Council .~ambe~s of."~he City 0croci1 el. the
City of ~iah, at ~iah~ Ce llfo~la ,. ~he City Co,oil cf the. O~ty.
of' Ukiah will hear and consider .a~y objections or protests to ~he'
proposed anne-xa~i.on to ~h'e OI~y o~ 'Ut~ah, .and ar~ per~.en ewnia~
real property wl~hln such ~e~rlto~r sought to be annexed and ha.V[r~ -
any obJeotiona to. 'the prop~s:e~ ar~exatien may applier be£.e~e said
City 'Council and shOW cause, if ar~ he ha~, why such ter~i~o'~y Should
not be annexed, The ~errlto~'.y so :semgh% %0 Be annexed is situate .~n
the County of .Mendeelne, ~tate of California, particularly .desex~be~
as follows:
BEG~..IN~ at th· tmte.~'"c,,~ion ~f She we'ste~ly line
of ~he. 0alifo.rnla ,a%a,~,e
H.i.~~":W'~th the ~hePly
lin· ef Lot i2.0. off .B:~Ie..y~ .SudsY' and ~p of Yokay~
~ncho~. and r~~.~e~ee ~U~er'12 along.
Ca~fo~la ~.tate. Hl~Y a .d.~.s.~noe of 2~ feet;
the~e We'aterty.~!!e! W~th .~he ~~er!y
of said Lot l~'and-."~XX~wi~ '~a'~d line a distance
of 220 feet more o~ ~eas 'to t'he ~!ty L i~ts of the
City of ~.ah~ amd ~H~'~ ~~ly fcllewi~ aaid
Cit2 L~-l~s l~me a ~!~:'t~e ~f ~0 fee~ mor~ o~