Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout55-23The Clt~y Council of the City of Ukish does resolve ss follows: 4 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 The receipt of the Affidavit of Publication of the Notice of Intention to Circulate Petition to Secure Annexation of Certain Territory to the City of Ukiah, California, is hereb? acknowledged, and the circulation of said Petitionis hereby approved. Said roper ties are situate in the County of Mendocino, State of ~alifornia, and particularly describe~ as follows, to-wit: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of Ukiah Southw~.st Addition No. 3 as delineated and described on Map fil§d in Nap Case No. 1, ~rawer No. 9, Page 37, in th_e office of the County Recorder, M~udocino Oounty; and running t~ence easterly along the southerly line of said addition to its intersection with the west line of the Lead Addition to the City of Ukish as delineated and describe~.! on }~ap filed in Map Case 1,cD~wer No. 8, Page 81, in the Office of the ounty Recorder of Mendocino County and running thence South along '~est line of the said ~ead Additlon to tae ~outhwest co~oner of said Mead Addition, ~hence easterly along t~e southerly line of said I~ead Addition to the southeast corner thereof and its intersection with the westerly line of the Southwestern Ad.:'~ition as described and deiinested on Map filed in Map Case No. 1, Drawer No. ~, pace 64, in 'the office of the County Recorder of Mendocino County and thence southerly alon~ said westerly line to the southwest corner of the said ?outhwestern Addit'i. on, thence easterly slon~ the southerly line of said~'outhwestern Ad~::ition to the southeast corner of said addition being a point on the easterly line of the right of way of California State Highway No. 101, thence southerly along said highway right of way, to its intersection with the south line of Lot 77, Yok~yo Hancho, thence westerly along said south line to its intersection with the westerly line of the Yokayo Hancho being point lying on the line between monum~nts "Y-AB" and "Y-Ag" as shown on Hoaley~s Map and Survey of ¥oka~o Rancho, thence northerly along said west llne to the ~oint of beginning. EXCEPT ING: 24 25 26 27 28 29 Parcel No, 1: The Cox-Norgard Addit!.~n to the ~['t~' of-~ia~ as delineated and described on Map filed in Map Case No. 1, Drawer No. $, pa~e 1~§, in the office of the County Recorder of Mendocino County, State of California. Parcel No. 2: All lends now or formerly owned b~'~ ~elvina J~nger and described in deed filed in Official Records of Mendocino County in Book 200, page 135. Parcel. NO.e.5: All lands now or formerly owned by ~0 VictOr and Mabel H. B~rgstrom and described in deed $1 filed in Official R~co~'ds of Mendocino ~ounty, Book 258, Page 450 WAYNE P. BURKE I ~,~, ~. , ......... ~ ~t tV C1~ CLERK' S 'RTIFICATE TO ORIGINAL PETITION FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY OF UKIAH TO BE KNOWN AS SOUTHWEST ADDITION NU.~BER & I, W_. J. ;BROADDUS, Clerk of the County of Mendocino, State of California, and J.. M. TURNER, Clerk of the Qi.ty of Ukiah, County of Mendocino, State of California, respectively, hereby certify that the foregoing initiative petition to which this certificate is attached was filed in the office of the City Clerk of sai~f city --..~n the 2Oth day of ~, 1955; that said petition consists of .__~_ sections and that all--6f-said sections were filed at the same time;-~hat each section contains signatures and dates purporting to be respectively the signa- tures of qualified electors of Proposed Southwest Addition No. & and the dates upon which such electors had respectively signed said petition; that attached to said petition at the time the same was filed as afore- said was an affidavit purporting to be the affidavit of the person who solicited the signatures thereon; that the person by whom said affidavit purports to have been taken and verified was at the time thereof an officer authorized to administer oaths; that therein affiant stated his own qualifications, that he had solicited the signatures upon said section, that all of said signatures were made in his presence and that to the best of his knowledge and belief each signature to the said section was the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and was to the best of his knowledge and belief a resident of Proposed Southwest Addition No. &. That after said petition was filed as aforesaid We, as said clerks, examined the affidavits of registration in said county, and the records relating thereto, current and in effect at the respective purported dates of such signing to determine therefrom what number of qualified electors signed said petition and had respectively affixed thereto the purported dates of their signing, and from said examination We, as said clerks, have determined that said petition was and is signed by __ 57 .... qualified electors of said county, and each of whom had affixed to 'said'"petition a date purporting to be the date when such elector had signed such petition and each of whom was a registered qualified elector of said county on said date; and we further certify that to the best of our knowledge and belief that the foregoing petition was signed by no less than _o~ne, fou~h of the qualified electors residing within the territory proposed 'to be ~ annexed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, said~ County Clerk of said County of ~doci. no ..... , State of California, have hereunto set my hand and affixed'my official -seal this _.~22n~ _._ day of July , 1955. Mendocino, State of California IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, said ..... J, M. TURNER .... , . .... : ~- ~ .- ~ ~ ~ ~ _ Clerk of the City of__Ukiah. County of Mend~.cino , State of California, have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this .... 22nd ,.~day of J~~, 1955.