HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-09-04 Packet CITY OF UKIAH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
September 4, 2002
6:30 p.m.
RESUME
~5:45-6:15 p.m.- Meet at Gardner Park for Dedication
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PROCLAMATIONS
a. September- 30th Birthday of the Ukiah Library
b. September- United Way Month
M/RC (5-0)
M/RC (5-0)
As Amended
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Joint Meeting of City Council and Planning Commission of August 21,2002
b. Regular Meeting of August 21,2002
Mayor Read 5.
RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION
Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision
by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally
limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially
challenged.
Mayor Read 6. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by
the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a
citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The
motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with
Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations.
M/RC (5-0) Approving items a thouqh o of the Consent Calendar:
a. Notification to Council Regarding Airport's Acquisition of Zero Emissions Vehicle
From Lasher Auto Center of Sacramento in the Amount of $8,891.03
b. Rejection of Claim for Damages Received From John Foster and Referral to
Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund
No. 1038 ........ c. Adoption of Ordinance Amending the City of Ukiah's PERS Contract to Add
Fourth Level 1959 Survivor Benefits- Police Unit
d. Award of Contract to Riley's Striping For Street Striping 2002, Specification No.
02-16 in the Amount of $18,930.56
e. Award of Contract to Granite Construction Company for 2000 STIP
Arterial/Collector Rehabilitation, Specification No. 02-15 in the Amount of
$527,406.20
f. Award of Contract to Granite Construction Company for 2000 STIP Local Street
Rehabilitation, Specification No. 02-14 in the Amount of $367,280.69
g. Award Acquisition of 2-Axle Truck With Dump Body to East Bay Ford Truck
Sales in the Amount of $57,625.43 for the Department of Public Works
h. Award of Bid for Various Pole and Pad Mount Transformers in the Amount of
$55,537.28 to Various Vendors
i. Adoption of Resolution Setting the Limitation on City Expenditures for Fiscal
Year 2002-2003
j,
No.2003-04 ....... k.
No.2003-05 ....... I.
m,
no
o.
Report of the Acquisition of Autocad 2002 Civil Series From DLT Solutions Inc.
In the Amount of $5,139.42
Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of Program
Supplement Nos. 771 and 772 to Administering Agency - State Agreement For
State Funded Projects No. 000049- STIP Rehabilitation Projects
Adoption of Resolution Restoring One On-Street Parking Space at 493 Highland
Avenue
Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement with EBA Engineering in an
Amount Not to Exceed $44,421.50 for Continuing Soil and Groundwater Plume Definition
at the Corporation Yard and Approve Budget Amendment in the Amount of $16,015
Notification of Purchase From the Kaman Co. for One Electronic Bearing Monitor in the
Amount of $6,308.45
Approval of Budget Amendment and Report to Council Regarding Purchase of Platform
Dump Body from River City Truck and Equipment in the Amount of $6,032.81
Mayor Read 7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you
are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a
matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit
your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown
Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the
agenda.
Dotie Copeland addressed Council regarding outdoor drying of clothes to save energy.
8. PUBLIC HEARING (7:00 P.M.)
a. Continuation of Public Hearing for the DANCO Builders/Shapiro General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning Project
M/RC (5-0) to continue the Public Hearing and directing Staff to renotice the project when a
meeting date is selected
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rec'd Report a. Presentation Regarding Pedestrian Safety
b. Approval of Establishment and Participation in the Russian River Watershed
Association
Mayor Ashiku to attend the meeting of the Russian River Watershed Association
10. NEW BUSINESS
a. Consideration of Operation Flags' Request to Display State Street Flags on
September 1 1,2002
M/RC (5-0) to grant permission for Operation Flaqs to dis!31ay American flags on State Street
on September 11, 2002
b. Discussion and Consideration of Proclamation Declaring September 1 1th a
Memorial Day and Funding of Supplies For Memorial Event
AI3!3roved a proclamation in memory of the September 11th traqedy and request for $150 tn_
purchase event items
Discussed c. Discussion and Prioritization of Goals
The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably
accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request.
RESUME
d. Discussion and Selection of Councilmembers for League of California Cities
Redwood Region Policy Committees
Selected Councilmembers Baldwin, Smith, and Larson to various Redwood Reqion Policy
Committees
e. Selection of Members for the Community Based Organization Grants Program
Committee
Appointed Councilmembers Baldwin and Libby to the Committee
11. COUNCIL REPORTS
12. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK/DIRECTOR REPORTS
13. CLOSED SESSION
a. Conference with Labor Negotiator G.C. §54957.6
Employee Negotiations: Misc. PERS Units
Labor Negotiator: Candace Horsley, City Manager
No Action Taken.
b.
No Action Taken.
Conference with Labor Negotiator G.C. §54957.6
Employee Negotiations: Misc. Unit Memorandum of Understanding
Labor Negotiator: Candace Horsley, City Manager
9:20 p.m. 14. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF UKIAH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
September 4, 2002
6:30 p.m.
*'5:45-6:15 p.m. - Meet at Gardner Park for Dedication
RESUME
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OFAI.LEGIANCE
3. PROCLAMATIONS
a. September - 30th Birthday of the Ukiah Library
b. September- United Way Month
As Amended
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Joint Meeting of City Council and Planning Commission of August 21, 2002
b. Regular Meeting of August 21, 2002
RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION
Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the riqht to a review of that decision
by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civi~ Procedure, which generally
limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially
challenged.
No. 1038
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by
the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a
citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The
motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with
Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations.
~ thou h o of the Consent Calendar:
a. Notification to Council Regarding Airport's Acquisition of Zero Emissions Vehicle
From Lasher Auto Center of Sacramento in the Amount of $8,891.03
b. Rejection of Claim for Damages Received From John Foster and Referral to
Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund
........ c. Adoption of Ordinance Amending the City of Ukiah's PERS Contract to Add
Fourth Level 1959 Survivor Benefits - Police Unit
d. Award of Contract to Riley's Striping For Street Striping 2002, Specification No.
02-16 in the Amount of $18,930.56
e. Award of Contract to Granite Construction Company for 2000 STIP
Arterial/Collector Rehabilitation, Specification No. 02-15 in the Amount of
$527,406.20
f. Award of Contract to Granite Construction Company for 2000 STIP Local Street
Rehabilitation, Specification No. 02-14 in the Amount of $367,280.69
g. Award Acquisition of 2-Axle Truck With Dump Body to East Bay Ford Truck
Sales in the Amount of $57,625.43 for the Department of Public Works
h. Award of Bid for Various Pole and Pad Mount Transformers in the Amount of
$55,537.28 to Various Vendors
i. Adoption of Resolution Setting the Limitation on City Expenditures for Fiscal
Year 2002-2003
No.2003-04 ....... k.
No.2003-05 .......
j. Report of the Acquisition of Autocad 2002 Civil Series From DLT Solutions Inc. In the Amount of $5,139.42
Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of Program
Supplement Nos. 771 and 772 to Administering Agency - State Agreement For
State Funded Projects No. 000049- STIP Rehabilitation Projects
I. Adoption of Resolution Restoring One On-Street Parking Space at 493 Highland
Avenue
m. Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement with EBA Engineering in an
Amount Not to Exceed $44,421.50 for Continuing Soil and Groundwater Plume Definition
at the Corporation Yard and Approve Budget Amendment in the Amount of $16,015
n. Notification of Purchase From the Kaman Co. for One Electronic Bearing Monitor in the
Amount of $6,308.45
o. Approval of Budget Amendment and Report to Council Regarding Purchase of Platform
Dump Body from River City Truck and Equipment in the Amount of $6,032.81
Mayor Read 7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you
are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a
matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit
your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown
Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the
agenda.
Dotie Copeland addressed Council reqarding outdoor drying of clothes to save energy.
8. PUBLIC HEARING (7:00 P.M.)
a. Continuation of Public Hearing for the DANCO Builders/Shapiro General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning Project
M/RC (5-0) to continue the Public Hearing and directing Staff to renotice the project when a
meeting date is selected
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rec'd Report a. Presentation Regarding Pedestrian Safety
b. Approval of Establishment and Participation in the Russian River Watershed
Association
Mayor Ashiku to attend the meeting of the Russian River Watershed Association
10. NEW BUSINESS
a. Consideration of Operation Flags' Request to Display State Street Flags on
September 11,2002
M/RC (5-0) to grant permission for Operation Flags to display American flags on State Street
on September 11, 2002
b. Discussion and Consideration of Proclamation Declaring September 11th a
Memorial Day and Funding of Supplies For Memorial Event
Approved a proclamation in memory of the September 11th tragedy and request for $150 to
purchase event items
Discussed c. Discussion and Prioritization of Goals
The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably
accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request.
RESUME
d. Discussion and Selection of Councilmembers for League of California Cities
Redwood Region Policy Committees
Selected Councilmembers Baldwin, Smith, and Larson to various Redwood Region Policy
Committees
e. Selection of Members for the Community Based Organization Grants Program
Committee
Appointed Councilmembers Baldwin and Libby to the Committee
11. COUNCIL REPORTS
12. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK/DIRECTOR REPORTS
13. CLOSED SESSION
a. Conference with Labor Negotiator G.C. §54957.6
Employee Negotiations: Misc. PERS Units
Labor Negotiator: Candace Horsley, City Manager
No Action Taken.
ba
No Action Taken.
Conference with Labor Negotiator G.C. §54957.6
Employee Negotiations: Misc. Unit Memorandum of Understanding
Labor Negotiator: Candace Horsley, City Manager
9:20 p.m. 14. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF UKIAH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
September 4, 2002
6:30 p.m.
*'5:45-6:15 p.m.- Meet at Gardner Park for Dedication
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PROCLAMATIONS
a. September- 30th Birthday of the Ukiah Library
b. September- United Way Month
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Joint Meeting of City Council and Planning Commission of August 21,2002
b. Regular Meeting of August 21,2002
SI
RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION
Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that
decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which
generally limits to ninety days (90) the time.within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be
judicially challenged.
1
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by
the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a
citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The
motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with
Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations.
a. Notification to Council Regarding Airport's Acquisition of Zero Emissions Vehicle
From Lasher Auto Center of Sacramento in the Amount of $8,891.03
b. Rejection of Claim for Damages Received From John Foster and Referral to
Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund
c. Adoption of Ordinance Amending the City of Ukiah's PERS Contract to Add
Fourth Level 1959 Survivor Benefits - Police Unit
d. Award of Contract to Riley's Striping For Street Striping 2002, Specification No.
02-16 in the Amount of $18,930.56
e. Award of Contract to Granite Construction Company for 2000 STIP
Arterial/Collector Rehabilitation, Specification No. 02-15 in the Amount of
$527,406.20
f. Award of Contract to Granite Construction Company for 2000 STIP Local Street
Rehabilitation, Specification No. 02-14 in the Amount of $367,280.69
g. Award Acquisition of 2-Axle Truck With Dump Body to East Bay Ford Truck
Sales in the Amount of $57,625.43 for the Department of Public Works
h. Award of Bid for Various Pole and Pad Mount Transformers in the Amount of
$55,537.28 to Various Vendors
i. Adoption of Resolution Setting the Limitation on City Expenditures for Fiscal
Year 2002-2003
j. Report of the Acquisition of Autocad 2002 Civic Series From DLT Solutions Inc.
In the Amount of $5,139.42
k. Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of Program
Supplement Nos. 771 and 772 to Administering Agency - State Agreement For
State Funded Projects No. 000049- STIP Rehabilitation Projects
I. Adoption of Resolution Restoring One On-Street Parking Space at 493 Highland
Avenue
m. Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement with EBA Engineering in an
Amount Not to Exceed $44,421.50 for Continuing Soil and Groundwater Plume Definition
at the Corporation Yard and Approve Budget Amendment in the Amount of $16,015
n. Notification of Purchase From the Kaman Co. for One Electronic Bearing Monitor in the
Amount of $6,308.45
o. Approval of Budget Amendment and Report to Council Regarding Purchase of Platform
Dump Body from River City Truck and Equipment in the Amount of $6,032.81
7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you
are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a
matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit
your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown
Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the
agenda.
al
PUBLIC HEARING (7:00 P.M.)
a. Continuation of Public Hearing for the DANCO Builders/Shapiro General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning Project
1
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Presentation Regarding Pedestrian Safety
b. Approval of Establishment and Participation in the Russian River Watershed
Association
10. NEW BUSINESS
a. Consideration of Operation Flags' Request to Display State Street Flags on
September 11, 2002
b. Discussion and Consideration of Proclamation Declaring September 11th a
Memorial Day and Funding of Supplies For Memorial Event
c. Discussion and Prioritization of Goals
d. Discussion and Selection of Councilmembers for League of California Cities
Redwood Region Policy Committees
e. Selection of Members for the Community Based Organization Grants Program
Committee
11. COUNCIL REPORTS
12. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK/DIRECTOR REPORT~_
13. CLOSED SESSION
a. Conference with Labor Negotiator G.C. §54957.6 Employee Negotiations: Misc. PERS Units
Labor Negotiator: Candace Horsley, City Manager
b. Conference with Labor Negotiator G.C. §54957.~
Employee Negotiations: Misc. Unit Memorandum of Understanding
Labor Negotiator: Candace Horsley, City Manager
14. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably
accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request.
V~IERF~S, h'braries pro~de unique opportunin'es for educan'on, expansion of one's inner
souI, romantic adventures, mind bending m?steries~ and soothing interIudes~ and serve as
community gathering pIaces~' and
WHERE~tS~ a library has been a s~ni~'cant /~xture in Uln'ah since 190~ operating/rom
only three locao'ons over this long and glorious tenure, t~'rst ln an upstairs room, then for $8 years
in the Carnegqe Foundan'on funded structure~ and most recently in its present locate'on at Perkins
and Main Stree~° and
~VttEREAS, this downtown locan'on has enhanced the quality o/life o/the greater Llkiah
Valley and has served as a stable cornerstone to the community,, and
~VttEREAS, the facillty is the culnzinan'on o/a joint e/fort by the County of Mendocino and
the City of Uklah which began in 1968 u4th the merger of the two libraries and the construcn'on o£
the present structure~, and
Vv~HEREAS, the library conn'n ues as a joint effort u4th the land and groun~ maintenance
pro~fded by the City and stat~'ng/day to day operations supplied by the County,. and
V~IEREA S, ~thyor Ralph Buxton presen ted the building constructed u4th City and Federal
funo~ to County Board of Super~fsor Chairman Ernest Banker at the October 21~ 1972 dedican'on,
after public ser~fces had been initiated on September 11~ 1972.
NO V~, THEREFORE I, Phillip Ashiku, Mayor of the City of U~'ah, on behalf of m? fellow
City Councilmembers, Phil Baldu4n, Kathy Libby, Roy Strdth, andE~c Larson do herebyproclaim
September 14, 2002 as the
30th BIRTHDAY017 THE. UKIAH LIBRARY
and encourage alIresidents of this community to share in the fesn'~'n'es planned for the celebran'on
and congratulate the sta~, volunteem~ and community for their dedican'on to seeing this facility
prosper over these many years.
Date: September 4, 2002
Philh'p Ashiku, Mayor
PROCLAM T][ON
WHEREAS, United Way has now reached its 11 Sth year of caring for those
less fortunate than ourselves and working toward building strong, healthy
communities; and
WHEREAS, United Way, Sonoma-Mendocino-Lake is primarily a group of
volunteers from our own three-County community; and
WHEREAS, a significant effort of United Way is the annual "Day of Caring"
involving volunteers in "hands on" projects to assist the non-profit organizations
within our community; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ukiah wishes to congratulate United
Way, Sonoma-Mendocino-Lake for its past endeavors and wishes it well in the
current drive for funds to continue and even add to those charitable institutions it
assists in our community.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, PhilIip Ashiku, Mayor of the City of Ukiah, on behalf of
my fellow City Councilmembers, Phil Baldwin, Kathy Libby, Roy Smith, and Eric
Larson, do hereby proclaim September 2002, as
UMTED WA Y MONTH IN THE CITY OF UKIAH
WHEREAS, contributions given by Iocal people through United Way, Sonoma-
Mendocino-Lake help local people through organizations such as: The American Red
Cross, Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mendocino County, The Greater Ukiah Senior
Center, Willits Seniors, Inc., People for People Ombudsman, Project Sanctuary, The
Ford Street Project, Mendocino Family and Youth, North Coast Opportunities,
Plowshares, Willits Community Services and Food Bank, Community Care
Management, and The Ukiah Community Center; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah employees continue to generously support United
Way, having contributed nearly $3, 700 in 2001; and
and urge support from every citizen, to the extent possible, for this campaign, its
volunteer workers, agencies, and programs.
Phillip Ashiku, Mayor
Dated: Septem; 2002
MINUTES OF THE UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2002
The Ukiah City Council met at a Special Joint Meeting with the Planning
August 21, 2002, the notice for which had been legally noticed and post~
in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 300 Seminary Avenue, U
was taken and the following Councilmembers were present:
Baldwin, and Mayor Ashiku. Planning Commissioners present:
Wallen, Correll, and Chairman Chiles. Staff present: Assistant
City Manager Horsley, Associate Planner II Lohse, Associat~
Director Stump, and City Clerk Ulvila.
Roll
n,
NEW BUSINESS
1. General Plan Implementation: Annual R~
Director Stump advised the Status Report p~
1999 details the current status of each City
General Plan. The document contains nearly 500 in'
that some of the short-term measures have expired.
and Planning Commission formulate possible priority
last revised in late
implementing the
measures. He noted
the City Council
)n.
2. Housing: Infill and tall~
There was a round-table di
Staff, and audience comm~
use issues facing the community.
frastructure
Commission, City
~ most pressing land
housing included:
* The Housing Element update
the critical items and annexal
order to have future d(
m~
as the City considers
ould also look at annexation in
* En~ affordal develo
within the City of Ukiah.
* Addressing
congestion in high-density residential areas.
th
[he comm~
Taskforce to address housing, water and sewer
acture was noted and that when the City considers
important to look at all services offered by the City. It is important to
from projects on the existing infrastructure, such as streets. There
on mixed-use projects in the City limits.
have a good working relationship with the County when considering
Special Joint Meeting of
City Council and Planning Commission
August 21,2002
Page 1 of 4
* It was noted by staff that more opportunities are available for residential
development in commercial zones for mixed-use projects. It was noted that the new fee
schedule offers reduced fees for affordable housing projects. '"
* It was noted that approximately 200 new housing units have been const
City in recent years and further development and housing objectives
changes in density in order to accomplish the City's objective of in,
base.
,ed majc ..........
g
* There was discussion regarding the City changing its poll
annexation. The current policy is for the City to respond to ests
it could be changed so that the City would pursue ann~ on its
The City should look at what is motivating an annexati that the City
would need to provide. It was noted that very little e to the City would be derive
from annexing residential areas. · .............. ,:.~:~:~
* The Ukiah Valley Area Plan (UVAP)
development. There was a great deal of support for
projects.
housing
* There was discussion concerning the difficulty in
pursue development when opposed to the
~erty owner to
* Concern for traffic conge,,
areas.
* The General Plan should h;
"cluster housing" and the use of the
of using sewage treatment and ho~
encourage hi~ ~, environme~
aesthetically. ~.stered housi~
to find a
encouragement of
". There was a suggestion
system as leverage to
d, 3pments that are designed
increased visibility and the City needs
hillsi~
density for
is a
dation that th, develop a blue line for development on
~wer density at higher elevation and a higher
s the visibility issue.
was di
;ion about setting a realistic cap on the City's resources and
ision in the General Plan.
* Anne
must look:
Influence.
is one
for its
keys to planning for expansion to include housing. The City
ist interest and have direct control over the City's Sphere of
It was ti
sus of most members present that a good working relationship with
necessary, whether or not the City plans to annex. The City should
g with the County with regard to land use issues.
Special Joint Meeting of
City Council and Planning Commission
August 21,2002
Page 2 of 4
* There was discussion concerning building second units.
* Discussion of new units being similar to existing units to allow for consist~
development.
of
* Planning Director Stump referred to a letter received today from
questions concerning annexations and water service.
* There was discussion of how housing is always an issue
come to the area. It was noted that annexation would provide the~
developments.
to
* It was noted that other communities have
recommendation was made that Staff provide
and City Council with regard to what other cities h
these issues. A
of situation.
Ana Araiza, 781 Cindee Drive, noted that th~
freeway exit north of Perkins Street in order to relieve
inquired as to its status.
to add another
on Gobbi Street. She
Staff advised that the concept of
on the west side of the
many at the current time.
Paul Andersen, 309 Jones
and discussed a recent article in
growth.
was discussed
was o
to be located
there were too
g infill development
dealing with increased
Lorie Leaf, the opinion
western hi the
second City should I
witho,
infill is more important than developing the
with regard to development of
the possibility of detached bedrooms
John Laz;
own land cont
with re~
not int~
d( ~t. He nc
h, e long t
opportunit
kiah, advised that he has several clients who
the City's boundaries and they are very interested in the City's
3n and development. One client owns 60-70 acres and if
~r property, they would approach the county with regard to
the property is currently used for agricultural purposes,
would be difficult to farm the land. His client is looking at all
m
Cod, Developing a Philosophy
Di= don of ways to improve the City Council-Planning Commission
relationship
of the members presented voiced their opinion for a daylong workshop with
~ing Commission and City Council so that more issues could be discussed. It
Special Joint Meeting of
City Council and Planning Commission
August 21,2002
Page 3 of 4
was also suggested that another joint meeting be scheduled after the November
election when the new Council would be seated.
* It was noted that some cities have power lunches between a
a couple Councilmembers so that the Councilmembers would
understanding of what is going on with the Planning Commission.
* There was discussion concerning politics entering into
Council, whereas most Planning Commissioners vote according
issues. The matter of the City Council overturning decisions
Commission was also discussed. It was also noted that
Commission decisions have come before Council.
* Mention was made that Council needs to be
it was recommended that they attend the
the
tn
of Plann
more on land use law. And~i~ii ii'i?::=:' .....
* It was the general consensus of those
City Council should continue to meet and develop
General Plan and develop a strategy to address issues.
5. Adjournment to Re,
There being no further
Council Meeting at
,ouncil meeting was
Commission and
philosophy towards the
at 6:30 p.m.
Marie Ulvila, City Clerk
Special Joint Meeting of
City Council and Planning Commission
August 21,2002
Page 4 of 4
MINUTES OF THE UKIAH CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2002
The Ukiah City Council met at a Regular Meeting on August 21, 2002, the
had been legally noticed and posted, at 6:40 p.m. in the Civic Center Co~
300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California. Roll was taken a
Councilmembers were present: Larson, Smith, Libby, Baldwin,
present: Customer Services Supervisor Archibald, Public Utilities
Captain Dewey, Finance Director Elton, Assistant City Manager
Plant Supervisor Jamison, City Attorney Rapport, and City Clerk Ulvi
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Everyone recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
~hich
Staff
Police
3. PRESENTATION
3a. Presentation by Barbara Eversole Re Use
Barbara Eversole, Ukiah, addressed Coun~
train depot on Perkins Street. She proposed that
of Commerce work in conjunction with the Senior
Bridges from the railroad and he is supportive of the propo,,
Building_
a visitor center in the
the Greater Ukiah Chamber
She has contacted Mr. Max
After some discussion concer
proposal, it was the conse~
support for the project to
of the
,r the City Ma
~nd Mrs. Eversole's
to prepare a letter of
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4a. Adjourned Regular Meetin¢
M/S Libby/Lars~
carried by th,
NI :
of August 7, 2002, as presented,
S: Councilmembers Larson, Libby, and Baldwin.
Mayor Ashiku. ABSENT: None.
1
Ma)
6. CON,~
DAR
)roving items a through c of the Consent Calendar as follows:
s for the Month of July 2002;
es Received From Diane Paget and Referred to Joint
Empire Municipal Insurance Fund;
ion to the City Council Regarding the Purchase of An Air
From Air Solutions Group for the Sum of $5,045.96.
by unanimous consensus of Council.
COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
forward to address Council.
Si
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Regular City Council Meeting
August 21,2002
Page 1 of 6
8a. Discussion and Possible Revision to Ukiah C.A.R.E.S. Program
Customer Service Supervisor Archibald advised that the semi-annual update for the
Public Benefit Fund was presented to Council last month. At that time, Council requested
that staff return with projected costs for possible changes in benefits and other ~ses for
Ukiah C.A.R.E.S. The changes to be considered at this meeting include sing
monthly discounts for eligible families from the current credit of $14.45 to
Increasing monthly discounts for eligible senior households from
Increasing the amount devoted to advertising the program from $1 0 per year,
and 4) Increasing the Income Guidelines for program eligibility.
She noted that staff would also like Council to consider and d
toward the Energy Conservation Rebate Incentive
expected to be finalized in the fall.
ling
Discussion followed with regard to the Income
potential costs for implementing changes,
programs. It was noted that a future Council m
difficult to anticipate what would happen
programs was encouraged.
Guidelines, four Scenario
utilization of funds f6~?all
ifficulties and it would be
· Marketing the
M/S Baldwin/Libby to increase the marketing allotment b,
~00 Scenario #3.
Discussion followed with
dealing with these types
community was deemed
bulbs that would provide long-term
resources and provide awareness,
the Photovoltaic Program, there is th
proved popular ~ding
increase fund
ion and the hiring of
need for
'ogram if that
that
all projE
;ned.
ef, and
with expertise in
~mmunication to the
~volved changing out light
programs to conserve
h $50,000 is set-aside for
could be used if the program
There would then be a need to
Councill ibers and Libby
on on a Iow,
in~
benefit the proposed Scenario would have
~ncome, while the cost of living continues to
Motion faile¢
NOES
None.
ss by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Libby and
ncilmembers Larson, Smith, and Mayor Ashiku. ABSTAIN' None.
Scenario #2 and to increase the marketing of the program by
an
000:
concerning the motion and comparing the various scenarios.
by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Larson, Smith,
, and Mayor Ashiku. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None.
Regular City Council Meeting
August 21,2002
Page 2 of 6
City Manager Horsley advised that Staff would report to Council concerning these
programs especially with regard to marketing and conservation programs once they are up
and running.
Councilmember Baldwin thanked staff for the readily understandable report.
9. NEW BUSINESS
9a. Approval of Letter of Response to the Grand Jury
City Manager Horsley advised that the City Council received a
the Grand Jury for their 2001-2002 Report. The response
Mentally III-A New Approach to Crisis Services" and "Domesti~
Orders". Staff is requesting Council approval of the City's ,onse
Staff Report.
~lence
M/S Larson/Baldwin approving the City's
information. Motion carried by unanimous voice
from
"The
,ing
...... ~::::~!~!ii~ii?:?:' 's re ue
to the Grant Jury q
.
NEW BUSINESS
Discussion of Water Issues and Possible
City Manager Horsley advised that due to the com
Russian River water in Mendocino County, a second stat~
is being presented for Council
that following Council direction.
residents to clarify the '
The topics were categorizecl
1. Amount of water available
City Manager Horsley advised of
reduction in flow Lake Pillsbury~'
However, Water Ag
M; n essence, it
on the 7 Section 7
flows Mendoci;
Ru,,
Mend°cino.
finalized.
;tion
the various issues regarding
water topics
recommended
sent to the City's
In.
newspaper noted a current
er is coming into Lake Mendocino.
is continuing to let higher flows leave Lake
indicator of one possible scenario based
are being performed to determine the
If they go back to dry year scenarios for the
;n there would be less water coming out of Lake
to Council as the Section 7 studies are
of of Ukiah has under permitted rights.
er Hors ained that the Russian River Flood Control District has
ts to 8,0! 'e-feet of Lake Mendocino water. The City of Ukiah is entitled to
ht and in addition holds it's own permit for 20 cfs of Russian River
r. Under the current conditions, the City of Ukiah has enough water as far as
In a very dry critical year, the City would be depending more on the Flood
and what's being released out of the lake, as the underflow water may be
a drought year.
h~
Rapport explained that the City has a priority date of 1956 so anyone that
~igher priority date than we do would have a right to take water before us. He noted
Regular City Council Meeting
August 21,2002
Page 3 of 6
that to represent the interest of Ukiah citizens, the City should maximize their rights against
everyone else's.
City Manager Horsley advised the Inland Water and Power Commission an
raising Coyote Dam. Once this process is initiated, it is estimated the
20 years. Another proposal is being made by Redwood Valley Water Distr
Eel River water diversions during the winter and that it be stored for use
She advised that she has asked the consultant to speak to the City
proposal and provide more information in September.
:ussing
)e
larding this
3. City water availability and reserves
City Manager Horsley explained that several weeks ago
and dramatic increase in water usage over an eight-hou
in temperature. In response, we suspended all City
irrigation users to refrain from watering, as well
obtained additional water from Millview Water Di
public responded quickly and the water levels
City
idents.
and asked other
the next day.
She advised that the City has recorded production
determine when additional capacity would be needed.
retained to design additional production capacity that will p
plant during high production Is.
additional storage will be const
level of assurance during th~
obtained Layne Christen~
water availability problem.
for the last 20 years to
ineering specialist has been
for the treatment
'nillion gallons of
to provide a greater
The City has also
possible solutions to the
Councilmember Larson was of
problems than th, ;ues that may
to inform the happens
the City in place
is facing more immediate
9d for 20 years. He felt it important
'the City encounter's a problem, and inquired if
indicate a certain stage of alert.
City
ca
a similar si
capacity of
lem.
lained that th{ ,'s average daily water use is very close to our
other very hot days we could potentially be in
ps to increase the reservoir space, increase the
and drawing more water in because of the river dropping has been a
Dire~
the
they were
off again.
now, they
the Ranney Collector was rehabilitated this year because
rate off considerably. When they did some initial test pumps,
,., about the results but once it was finished, the production fell back
~d to discuss problems with production. Based on what they know
:recommend that the water production portion of the plan be moved forward.
b~
lan
Water Treatment Plant Supervisor, discussed the City's water levels and
at it is a rare occurrence for the City to get water from Millview Water District
we usually supply them with water.
Regular City Council Meeting
August 21,2002
Page 4 of 6
Councilmember Libby discussed the recent water shortage crisis and notifying customers
in the newspaper or on the radio. Large water users within the City limits were discussed.
Councilmember Baldwin inquired if there is any way to determine whetl or not
extraction of water from Gibson Creek during the summer or significant increa on
the hillsides would impact the City's 2 million gallons per day that we 's
wells.
Supervisor Jamison discussed the City's various wells. He fu
City were only able to use three wells during the summer months
that check dams be installed in the river starting a few miles south
and have them brought up a foot or so at a time. This w.
and will bring the water level over the laterals.
bed
if the
~ended
ctor
City Manager Horsley explained that under St
the river without going through the reviews an~
consuming. She explained that the process
temperature, turbidity, or flow. All of these fat
this sort.
e
besides gravel, silt,
in a study of
Mary Lindley, Ukiah, felt more education should be prov
conservation and the possibility uding that information
with regard to
g.
Paul Andersen,
noted that there are a lot of
ote conservati
!rams
reclaiming water. He
could access.
Director Barnes advised that the
for the wastewater treatment plant
water at the treatment
included relat storage, and
,n proje~
was includi
issues.
an evaluation of the proposals
ability to produce reclaimed
in the RFP, however it was not
Council :ommended c~
in tht
sense conservation measures be included
Councilme
there would
;d that footnotes be included in the newsletter so
for those wishing to learn more about specific programs.
of the newsletter related to conservation in a simplified
'red to the previous agenda item concerning the Grand Jury and
in the City's response regarding the domestic violence restraining
protective orders issued by the courts.
Horsley explained that the points Ms. Araiza referenced were contained in
the Grand Jury. The City's response to their letter makes those corrections.
CIL REPORTS
Regular City Council Meeting
August 21,2002
Page 5 of 6
Councilmember Larson reported attended the water forum and the Ukiah Players 25 year
celebration. He also attended the Sunday in the Park sponsor recognition dinner. He's
been very active with the Ukiah Senior Center and there is a pending transaction that would
take the Center out of debt.
Councilmember Smith reported that the Main Street Board had an
California Main Street Program. The report encouraged them to use th~
additional general support from other funding sources. At the Main
Board meeting a notice was sent to recruit people to serve on
which he listed.
le
rt and
ram's last
He explained that he attended the Concert in the Park spon;
NCPA meeting is to be held tonight and tomorrow in Mu~
attend. The NCPA annual conference is scheduled for
He noted provided the City Manager with ph,
reference.
but not be al
in Monterey ..... ::,,~,:~:~,~,,?:??~, ....
park in Washingt°i~!i!i:/i~Or~:':'~:~':~"~:":'~'
Councilmember Libby reported attending the watE
Game, and marine fisheries kept emphasizing how
landowners for permitting of water.
noted that the Fish and
are willing to work with
..
Mayor Ashiku reported that h
skateboard parks, noting the
north and visited m;
MRSU
and a number of
11. CITY MAN
City Manager Horsley inquired if
remembrance of the events that haPl
1, 2001.
in a short service in
Discussion 'egard to
was could work
ocal organizations holding remembrance and it
on the matter.
City ,ided a letter ti
submitted by Mr. William French, Jr.
City Clerk
two seats on ti
sed the ordE
lice will b~
dates are running for Mayor and five candidates for
Council in the November election. The Secretary of State's office has
candidates' names will be listed on the ballot. She will submit a
this information to the public.
12.
None.
13.
There bein
further business, the City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
City Clerk
Regular City Council Meeting
August 21,2002
Page 6 of 6
ITEM NO. 6a
DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT:
NOTIFICATION TO COUNCIL REGARDING AIRPORT'S ACQUISITION OF ZERO
EMISSIONS VEHICLE FROM LASHER AUTO CENTER OF SACRAMENTO IN THE
AMOUNT OF $8,891.03.
Pursuant to Ukiah City Code Section 1522 A3, this notice is provided to the City Council
regarding acquisition of products or services between $5,000 and $10,000.
The Ukiah Regional Airport, in an effort to conserve energy has purchased a Zero Emissions
Vehicle (ZEV) for use on the airport and for in town transportation. Staff issued a Request for
Proposals (RFP) to 12 area vehicle dealers for a ZEV. The successful respondent was Lasher Auto
Center of Sacramento.
The purchase price of the vehicle is $8,891.03. Funding for the purchase is included in the
adopted 2002/2003 budget.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive Report Regarding Airport Acquisition Of Zero Emissions Vehicle
in the amount of $8,891.03.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS:
1. Direct Staff to seek additional proposals.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
Airport Commission
N/A
Don Bua, Airport Manager
Candace Horsley, City Manager and Nora Kennedy, Purchasing
Supervisor.
1. Proposal from responding dealers.
2. Request for Proposals.
m,~:asrcc02 Can--dace Horsley, CitY/Manager
ZEVpurchase
TO:
LASHER AUTO CENTER
Fleet Department
5800 Florin Road
Sacramento, CA 95823
I0c Ser~ ~ ,: ry ,z v,~ ~ e
Phone 7( 7~ 53~! I~ ~ax "0 '~3 6 !34
~X :;OFI~S ~CCEETED
~E'TUEN THIS FO~
~'S IS NOT ~ O~ER
DATE: 7/22/02
'I~_.Q. NO. '"E 2201'2
BIDS WILL BE RE, C~ ~
1:30 p.m. Aupst 5, 2002
AT THE OFFICE OF THE PURCHASING
AGENT, CITY of UIOAH
BY: Nora Kennedy
TO:
F.O.B. UKIAH
)iL. DATE: '/'~,,,~" ~0 C~, J' '
TERMS:
i. Right is reserved to reject any and ali bids.
2. Right is reserved to accept separate items unless specifically denied by bidder.
3. Right is reserved to reject a quote from any bidder who has previously failed to perform
edequatob ~ the Cay of Uk~ah.
4. In CASE OF DEFAULT, the City of Uldah may procure the items quoted on from other
sources and hold the original bidder liable for any increased costs.
5. The price, terms, delivery point, and delivery date may individually or collectively be the
basis of the awarding of the bid.
6. ALL OUOTATIONS MUST BE SIGNED. OPENING DATE and TIME "MUST" be
prominently displayed on submitting envelope.
7. In submitting the above, the vendor agrees that the acceptance of any or all quotations
. by the City of Uktah, within 30 days constitutes a contract.
ii i ii I II
:0:
CITY of UKIAH
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukblh CA. ~5482
Phone 70T-463-6233 Fax 707-463.6234
......... FAX COPIF'~ 'ACCEPTE'D' .....
~rU~N TInS ~0~
THIS IS NOT AN ORDER
SANTA ROSA CHRYSLER JEEP
955 Santa Rosa Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA 95054
IUOTAT[ON$ ARE REQUF~TED FOR THE FOLLOWINO ITEMS:
~ , ...................... ' ' Ill 4LI~ 9UOTAl~O ~T8
~u~Trrv -F .....'" ........................
.i ,, , , ,,~ , D]SSCm~[O~- ' .... ' '~"
· 1' ] our Passenger Zero En-.;-nissions Vehicle as per aruaChed City- ' '
l of Ukiah specifications,
IIfyou have questions, please contact: Don Bua at 707-46%2855
/
..~-'"'",,,' C o ~fZ:.'t' / /~ u m t,, e~
~Cc..
DATE: 7/22/02
R~,Q. NO. ' E 22012 ......
.1 . _ IL. ' i i i , , i .i i.i
m:ae p.~ ~ug~t ~, 2002
IAG~T. CI~ oFUKJAH
JBY: N~
~ i I i ,
Sales Tax:
_ ·
TOTAL:"
IFC/--
2. Right is reserved to accept s~pamte items unless specifically denied by bidder.
3, Right ia reserved to reject a quote from an), bidder who has prevtou~ failed to perform
4. In CASE OF DEFAULT, the City of Ukiah may pn3cure the Items qu~ed on from Differ
Source~ and hold the original bidder liable for any Increased costS.
!$. The price, terms, delivery point, and delivery date ma3, individually or collectively be the
basis of the awarding of the bid.
6. ALL QUOTATIONS MUST BE SIGNED. OPi~NING DATE and TIME 'MUST" be
pr0minently dlsplaye~on submitting envelope.
7. In submitting the above, the vel~lor egress [hat the a~s of any or all quotatioas
by the City of Ukiah, within 30 days constitutes a con~ract.
..... , ~ _ I I I [ i IlL I T I I III I J _ II ii i ·
-I
TO:
tO~ $~nim ry f.v:~ u~
t kiah C, ~. 5 ~.i~ 2
PI on~ 7~ ~7-463~23 ~ ~x 70 ~ 63 ~ ~34
I ' m 3 r' vcr quo
II
, I I I I ~:,~~ I
FAX COPIES AC ,El'TEE
RETURN THIS FORM
IH[S ~ NOT ~
UKIAH DODGE-CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH INC.
2500 North State Street
Ukiah, CA 95482
iiii
DATE: 7/22/02
P. EQ. NO.' _.E_ ..2.2012 ' "
1:30 p.m. Augmt ~, 2002
AT THE 'OFFICE OF ~ ptJR~ING "'
AGENT. CITY of UKIAH
BY: Nora Kennedy
·
qUOTATIONS ARE ,R~Q~ ?0R'~, FOLLOV~NO ITIi,M,S,,: ,, ~LL QUOTA,TIONS, SHukL~ ~ ~0~ ~ ~.
qu~~ DESC~TION I u~
1 Po~ P~ng~ ~o ~iom Ve~cle ~ ~ a~d Ci~ - i~ce:
of~ ~c~o~. ISles T~:
ITOT :
.
~you ~ve question, ple~e conact: Don B~ at 707~67-2855
TOTAL
I I
/o,..g.v p.
_ .eooo,
1. Right is reserved to reject any and all bids.
2. Right is reserved to accept separate Items unless specifically denied by bidder.
3. Right is reserved to reject a quote from any bidder wh~ has previously failed to perform
adequately for Ihe City of Ukish.
4. In CASE OF DEFAULT, the City of Ukiah may procure the items quoted on from oltier
sources and hold the original bidder liable for any increased costs.
5. The pdce, terms, delivery point, and delivery date may Individually or collectively be the
basis of the awarding of the bid.
6. ALL QUOTATIONS MUST BE SIGNED. OPENING DATE and TIME "MUST' be
prominently displayed on submitting envelope.
7. In submitting the above, the vendor agrees that the acceptance of any or all quotations
by, the city of Uldah, wi,thin 30 daYS constitutes, contracL
i i ii I iiii ' i ii i i I i
UkiahDodge Chrysler Plymouth Jeep
..
2500 North State Street · Ukiah, California 9S482
(70'7) 462-2948 ,. 1-800-998-9933 · Fax (707) 4.62-8453
TO:
ill
~0~ Seminl ry .~ v:l
P~one 7( 7-463-623 ~ ?ax 70~63,.62~
~QtJEST FOR QUOTATION
r eturN orm
I'~ IS NOT ~N O~ER
UKIAH DODGE-CHRYSLER. PLYMOUTH INC.
2500 North State Street
Ukiah, CA 95482
DATE: 7/22/02
R~Q. NO. E'22012
' [DS '
!:30 p.m. August 5, 2002
AT ~ O~Fi~ OF ~ P~~~G
AGE~. C~Y of~
BY: Nora K~
C. a.D
)]E~'DA~:
I]DDEI~
IY:
~hOl~:
:ax:
~ATE:
!of Ukiah specifications.
If you have questions, please contact: Don Bua at 707-467-2855
, , ,
F.O.B. UKIAH
TERMS:
Sales Tax:
TO?ALi
i._
1. Right is reserved to reject any and all bids.
2. Right is reserved to aCCept separate items unless spedfically denied by bidder.
3. Right is resm~ed to reject a quote from any bidder who has previously failed to perform
adequately for the City of Ukiah.
4. in CASE OF DEFAULT, the City of Ukiah may procure the items quoted oo from other
sources and hold the original bidder liable for any increased costs.
5. The price, terms, delivery point, and delivery date may individuNly or collectively be the
basis of the awarding of the bid.
6. ALL QUOTATIONS MUST BE SIGNED. OPENING DATE and TIME 'MUST' be
prominently displayed on submitting envelope.
7. In submitting the above, the vendor agrees that the acceptance of any or alt quotations
by the Cit~,, of Uldah. within 30 days constit ,utes a contract.
I i I I
i-
~))C ~.OP~,: ~ ,~CC~
RETURN THIS FORM
Tg~S I$ NOT AN ORDF.~
ALBERA BROS. CHRYSLER JEEP
2860 16th Street
San Francisco, 94103
~TI,,~,_ '.I~OJ. LOWTNO ms:
CITY OF UKIAH
AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
ONE ZERO EMMISSIONS VEHICLE
JULY 2002
The City of Ukiah invites proposals for fumishing one (1) new 2002 or 2003 zero
emissions vehicle.
The following specifications shall be considered minimum. All deviations from
these specifications shall be described in the bid proposal. There will be no trade-
ins involved in this bid.
,4, PAS,S, ENGER,ZE, RO EMMISSlONS VEHICLE
Rating:G.V.W. rating shall be not less than 2,100 lbs. This unit will be used as an
airport service vehicle and utility passenger transport
requiting maximum G.V.W. rating, and ali equipment
which is set out in the manufacturer's printed literature
as being mandatory or which is suggested in order to
meet these operating conditions and comply with the
stated G.V.W.R. shall be furnished.
Motor:
Electric, 72 volt shunt GE motor.
Frame: Wheelbase- 126.5 inch minimum.
Transmission:
Front-wheel ddve, direct coupled Dana Spicer differential.
Pay Load:
820 lbs. capacity minimum.
Tires:
Single front, and rear- 12 inch two ply street rated
minimum.
Cab and Accessories: Standard with vinyl seats, scuff guards, rigid side curtains,
swivel trunk, front bumper, accessory plug.
Brakes: 4 Wheel Hydraulic.
Exterior Color:
White / Yellow
Interior Color:
Standard color
Batteries:
Six industrial 12-voit deep cycle batteries.
Battery Charger:
72 voit on board charger with charge status LED using
110 volt AC current.
Ddving Range:
35 miles
Other:
Owners / operators manual including required
maintenance schedule.
ITEM NO. 6b
DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT:
REJECTION OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES RECEIVED FROM JOHN FOSTER
AND REFERRAL TO JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, REDWOOD EMPIRE
MUNICIPAL INSURANCE FUND
The claim from John R. Foster was received by the City of Ukiah on August 20, 2002
and alleges damages related to a grass fire at 1061 Cunningham on August 7, 2002.
Pursuant to City policy, it is recommended the City Council reject the claim as stated
and refer it to the Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund (REMIF).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Reject Claim For Damages Received From John R. Foster And
Refer It To The Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire
Municipal Insurance Fund.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS:
Alternative action not advised by the City's Risk Manager.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
Yes
Claimant
Michael F. Harris, Risk Manager/Budget Officer~ ,~)~.~,....._
Candace Horsley, City Manager
1. Claim of John Foster, pages 1-2.
APPROVED:
mfh :asrcc02
0807CLAIM
Candace Hor~ley,-City~
Manager
NOTICE OF CLAIM AGAINST
THE CITY OF UKIAH, CALl
This claim must be presented, as prescribed by Parts 3 and 4 of Division 3.6, of
State o£ California, by the claimant or by a person acting on his/her behalf.
RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO:
.
.
.
.
^
CiTY OF UKIAH ~
Attn: City Clerk
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, California 95482
AUG 2 0 2002
CITY OF UKIAH
CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
CLAIMANT'S NAME:
CLAIMANT'S ADDRESS:
Number/Stree~ and/or Post Office Box
c~y
State Zip Code
Home Phone Number
Work Phone Number
PERSON TO WHOM NOTICES REGARDING THIS CLAIM SHOULD BE SENT (if different from above):
Name
Number/Street and/or Pos! Office
.( ).
Telephone
City Slate
DA TE OF THE ACCIOENr OR OCCURRENCE: : ~,'0: O 5S T--
PLACE OF ACODENT OR OCCURRENCE: __/& ~, / ~ U ~'
Zip Code
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE (Attach additional page(s), if more
7. NAME(S), if known, OF ANY PUB&.IC EMPLOYEE(S) ALLEGEDLY CAUSING THE INJURY OR LOSS:
.
WITNESS(ES), ff known (optional):
Name
b~
:le .phong ,
-
.
10.
DOCTOR(S)/HOSPITAL(S), ff any, WHERE CLAIMANT WAS TREA TED:
a. Name ~ I /Yl Address
Telephone
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INDEBTEDNESS, OBUGA TION, INJURY, DAMAGE OR LOSS so far
as if may be known at the time of presentation of the claim:
STATE THE AMOUNT CLAIMED ff it totals less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) as of the date of
presentation of the claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage or loss, insofar as
it may be known at the time of the presentation of the claim, together with the basis of computation of the
amount claimed (for computation use #12 below). However, ff the amount claimed exceeds ten thousand
dollars ($10,000), no dollaramount shall be included in the claim. However, it shall indicate whetherthe claim
would be a limited civil case (CC.P § 85). '
Amount Claimed $ 0~ ~'~--(~ ~' '--~ or Applicable Jurisdiction
12. THE BASIS OF COMPUTING THE TOTAL AMOUNT CLAIMED IS AS FOLLOWS:
a. Damages Incurred to date: $
Expenses for medical/hospital care:
Loss of earnings:
Special damages foc
General damages:
b. Estimated prospective damages as far as known:
Future expenses for medical and hospital care:
Future loss of earnings:
Other prospective special damages:
Prospective general damages:
This claim must be signed by the claimant orby some person on his/her behalf. A claim relating to a cause of action
for death or for injury to the person or to personal property or growing crops shall be presented not later than six (6)
calendar months or 182 days after the accrual of the cause of action, wh~c~ever is longer. Claims relating to any
other causes of action shall be presented not later than one (1) year a~er/accq.~ of th~ cause of action.
x' - /~' ~ ~SIGN~t ~i~E ~0F ~.LAiMANT(S)
IReceived in the Ofl-~'e of the CJty Clerk this ~ day of ~ , 20<:~,~ .
NOTE: This form of claim is for your convenience only. Any o~her type of form may beabsed if desired, as long as it
satisfies the requirements of the Government Code. The use of this form is not intended in any way to advise you of
your legal rfghts or to interpret any law. If you ere in doubt regarch'ng your legal rights or the interpretation of any law,
you should seek legal counsel of your cho/ce at your own expense.
Rev. 2000
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO 6 c.
DATE: Sept. 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT:
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF UKIAH'S PERS
CONTRACT TO ADD FOURTH LEVEL 1959 SURVIVOR BENEFITS - POLICE
UNIT
At its August 7, 2002 meeting, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to
Authorize amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the Public
Employees' Retirement System (PERS) and the City Council of the City of Ukiah to provide
Section 21574- Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits for local police members only.
A first reading (by title only) of the Ordinance authorizing the amendment also took place at
the August 7, 2002 Council meeting. Thirty days after adoption of the Ordinance, the
proposed contract amendment will become operative.
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance authorizing amendment of the PERS
Contract to provide 4th Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits for local police members only.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
,
Adopt Ordinance Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract Between the City.
Council of the City of Ukiah and the Board of Administration of the California
Public Employees' Retirement System.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Do not adopt Ordinance.
2. Refer to Staff for further information.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
N/A
Melody Harris, Personnel Officer
Candace Horsley, City Manager
1. Ordinance Authorizing Amendment to PERS Contract
2. Ameqdm.ent to Contract
APPROVED:~~_.:~/~~~"
Candace Horsley, City Manger
3:MOU~.SP.4thlevelpol
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETVVEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH
AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
The City Council of the City of Ukiah does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1
That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Ukiah and the
Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby authorized,
a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit, and by such reference made
a part hereof as though herein set out in full.
SECTION 2
The Mayor of the City of Ukiah is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to
execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency.
SECTION 3
This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and prior to
the expiration of 10 days from the passage thereof shall be published as required by law in the
Ukiah Daily Journal, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the County
of Mendocino and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
Introduced by title only on August 7, 2002, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Larson, Libby, and Vice-Mayor Baldwin.
None.
None.
Mayor Ashiku and Councilmember Smith.
Passed and adopted on September 4, 2002, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Philip Ashiku, Mayor
Marie Ulvila, City Clerk
CalPERS
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees' Retirement System
and the
City Council
City of Ukiah
The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency,
hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective August
1, 1962, and witnessed June 4, 1962, and as amended effective January 1, 1973,
January 2, 1983 June 30, 1992, May 7, 1999 and November 8, 1999 which provides.for'
participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree
as follows:
· .
A,
Paragraphs 1 through 12 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed
effective November 8, 1999, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs
numbered 1 through 13 inclusive:
.
All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall
mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety
members.
,
Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after August 1, 1962 making its employees as
hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of
the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on
election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all
amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by
express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting
agency.
1
e
.
=
Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
al
b.
co
Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members);
Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members);
Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
local miscellaneous members).
In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become
members of.said Retirement System:
NO ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIONS
The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service for local miscellaneous members shall
be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law,
subject to the reduction provided therein for service prior to December 31,
1982, termination of Social Security, for members whose service has been
included in Federal Social Security (2% at age 55 Full and Modified).
The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be
determined in accordance with Section 21362 of said Retirement Law (2%
at age 50 Full).
Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
ao
bo
c.
de
Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation).
e.
Section 20965 (Credit for Unused Sick Leave).
Section 21573 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local
miscellaneous members and local fire members only.
Sections 21624, 21626 and 21628 (Post-Retirement SurviVor
Allowance).
Section 20516 (Employees Sharing Cost of Additional Benefits):
Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation); Section 20965
(Credit for Unused Sick Leave); and Sections 21624, 21626 and
21628 (Post Retirement Survivor Allowance).
,
.
11.
From and after January 2, 1983 the safety employees of Public
Agency shall be assessed an additional 1% of their compensation
for a total contribution rate of 10% pursuant to Government Code
Section 20516.
Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes
of 1976.
g,
Section 20503 (To Remove the Exclusion of Employees Who Are'
Paid On An Hourly, Per Diem, Or Weekly Basis While Being
Employed On A Temporary Emergency or Seasonal Basis),
Prospectively from November 8, 1999).
h,
Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local
police members only.
Removal of the exclusion of "Employees Who Are Paid On An Hourly, Per
Diem, or Weekly Basis While Being Employed On a Temporary,
Emergency or Season Basis", pursuant to Section 20503, is declarative of
agency's previous interpretation and does not mandate any new classes
of employees into membership.
Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20790,
ceased to be an "employer" for purposes of Section 20834 effective on
January 2, 1983. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be
fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834,
and accumulated contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board 'as
provided in Government Code Section 20834.
Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions
determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with
respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said
Retirement System.
Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
ao
bo
Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21573 of said Retirement
Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and
liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a
single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all
local miscellaneous members and local fire members.
Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement
Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and
liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a
single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all
local police members.
12.
C.
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of
administering said System as it affects the employees of Public
Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the
periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
d.
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
Contributions required of Public AgenCy and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
13.
Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid
by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the
end of the period to which said Contributions refer or as may be prescribed
by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of
contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be.made in
connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of
errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct
payments between the employee and the Board.
a.
This amendment shall be effective on the
_
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
_ day of
CITY COUNCIL
CiTY OF UKIAH
BY
KENNETH W. MARZION, CHIEF
ACTUARIAL & EMPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
BY
PRESIDING OFFICER
Witness Date
Attest:
Clerk
AMENDMENT
PERS-CON-702A (Rev. 8\96)
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO.
6d
DATE: September 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO RILEY'S STRIPING FOR STREET STRIPING
2002, SPECIFICATION NO. 02-16 IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,930.56
SUMMARY: The City distributed specifications to ten builder's exchanges and 11
contractors for the annual street striping contract. The City publicly advertised this project
on August 11,2002 and August 15, 2002 in the Ukiah Daily Journal. Two sealed proposals
were received and opened by the City Clerk on August 27, 2002. The lowest responsive,
responsible bidder is Riley's Striping Service of Benicia, California with a total bid of
$18,930.56. The Engineer's Estimate for the project is $19,007.78. The City budget has
$28,000 for this project.
If the bid is awarded, compensation for the performance of the work will be based on unit
prices bid for contract item quantities actually installed. Bid totals are based on unit prices
bid for contract items at estimated quantities, and therefore, the actual total paid to the
contractor may be lower or higher than the bid total indicated.
As with construction projects there may be cost overruns by reason of unforeseen work or
because actual quantities installed exceed estimated quantities. Policy Resolution No. 13,
authorizes the responsible Department Head with approval of the City Manager to issue
change orders not to exceed 10 percent of the original contract sum or $5,000 whichever is
greater provided that no change, when added to the original contract sum, exceeds the
amount budgeted for the project
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award the contract for Street Striping 2002, Specification No.
02-16, to Riley's Striping in the amount of $18,930.56.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Reject all bids and direct staff to
readvertise for bids. 2. Determine street striping for public safety of City maintained
streets is not necessary and provide direction to staff.
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested by: Diana Steele, Director of Public Works/City Engi_neer~
Prepared by: Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works
Coordinated with' Candace Horsley, City Manager
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Attachments: 1. Bid Tabulation
2. Bid Proposal from Riley's Striping
3. FiscaI,Y-~r 2002/2003 Budget Sheet
APPROVED:L'-~~z~-~-~ /_
Candace Horsley, City ~anager
AGstripe2002.SUM
CITY OF UKIAH
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STREET STRIPING 2002
Specification No. 02-16
Bid Tabulation
Prepared By: Rick Seanor
Fund/Account No. 100-3110-250
BID OPENING: AUGUST 27, 2002
BUDGET AMOUNT = $28,000
- I
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Riley's Striping Central Striping Service, Inc.
j Benicia, CA Rancho Cordova, CA
PRICE
5,376 LF Broken White 4" ~. $0.06 $322.56 $0.07 $376.32 $0.05 $268.80
73,276 LF Broken Yellow 4" $0.06 $4,396.56 $0.07 $5,129.32 $0.05 $3,663.80
4,648 LF Solid White4" I $0.07 $325.36 $0.08 $371.84 $0.101 $464.80
10,978 LF Solid Yellow 4" -- $0.07; $768.46 $0.08 $878.24 $0.10 $1,097.8~-
3,281 , LF Solid White 8" $0~20 $656.20 $0.12 $393.72 $0.20 $656.20
24,971 I LF Double Yellow $0.141 $3,495.94! $0.$0'12 !~12 $2,996.52 $0.3050'20 $154'994'20,754.40
5,848 LF Two Way Left Turn Yellow $0.14 $818.72 $701.76 '
30,975 LF I Bike Lane 4" White I $0.08 $2,478.00 $0.08 $2,478.00 $0.10 i $3,097.50
42,250 LF Bike Lane 6" White $0.09 $3,802.50 $0.10 $4,225.00 $0.15 $6,337.50
882 LF i No Passing Zone, 4" Yellow $0.14 $123.48 $0.12 $105.84 $0.10 ~. _ $88.20
Type D, two-way yellow ' ~ $3.75 $1,365.00
364 EA reflective pavement markers $5.00 $1,820.00 $3.50 $1,274.00
I
I
-- TOTAL $19,007.78 TOTAL $18,930.56i TOTAL $23,788.20
Date and Time Printed: 8/27/2002 at 5:26 PM
Filenarne: BidTab-Stripmg02-16
f~TTFt £ H tFI E IU T :~ ~L
BIDDING SCHEDULE
In case of discrepancy between wOrds and figures, the words shall prevail.
·· ].r !
ITEM NO. QUANTITY DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE BID 'EXTENDED AMOUNT
(in words and in figures) FOR ITEM
(in figures)
Broken White 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for the price
per linear foot of
1 5,376 LF
Broken Yellow 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for the price
per linear foot of
~~ ~~s ($ . o7 ) $ ~'1 Sq. ~ ?_.
2 73,276 LF
Solid White 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for the pdce per
I linear foot of
~-~~- (~~
3 4,648 LF
Solid Yellow 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for the price per
linear foot of
4 10,978 LF
Solid White 8" Painted Traffic Stripe for the price per
linear foot of
5 ~L~e Q~ ($,, .I ~ ) $. ~9~.7~
3,281 LF
Double Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe for the price per
linear foot of
6 24,971 LF
Two Way Left Turn Lane (yellow) Painted Traffic
Stripe for the price per linear foot of
7 5,848
Bike Lane 4" White Painted Traffic Stripe for the price
per linear foot of
8 30,975 LF
Bike Lane 6" White Painted Traffic Stripe for the price
per linear foot of
9 42,250 LF
Yellow No Passing Zone 4-inch Paint~ Traffic Stripe
for the price per linear foot of
10. 882 LF
Two-way yellow reflective pavement maxem for the
pdce per each of
~ c,.c~ ~=~ (, ~.~ ) , I~ 7~,~O
11. 3~ EA
TOTAL BID AMOUNT ==~
Spec. No. 02-16 26 StreetStriping2002 j~ ~¢ j~. ~.~
We, the undersigned, further agree, if this proposal shall be accepted, to sign the agreement and to furnish the
required bonds with satisfactory surety, or sureties, within fifteen (15) calendar days after written notice that the
contract is ready for signature; and, if the undersigned shall fail to contract, as aforesaid, it shall be understood
that he or she has abandoned the contract and that, therefore, this proposal shall be null and void and the
proposal guaranty accompanying this proposal, or the amount of said guaranty, shall be forfeited to and become
the property of the City. Otherwise, the proposal guaranty accompanying this proposal shall be returned to the
undersigned.
Witness our hands this day of .JS.,~.~,_,.~'~'' ~-G ,20~Z..
Licensed in accordance with an, act, providing for the registration of California Contractors License No.
E~ ~,3Z, c~ , expiration date ~,./-~1./~,~ .
THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER AND EXPIRATION DATE STATED HEREIN ARE MADE UNDER
PENALTY OF PERJURY.
Signature of bidder or bidders, with business addresses:
Notice: In the case of a corporation, give below the addresses of the principal office thereof and names and
addresses of the President, Secretary, Treasurer.
StreetStriping2002 ?.'7
Spec. No. 02-16 ~- ~, ~
FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES CERTIFICATION
The undersigned, in submitting a bid for performing the following work by Contract, hereby certifies that he or she
has or will meet the standards of affirmative compliance with the Fair Employment Practices requirements of the
Special Provisions contained herein.
STREET STRIPING 2002
(Signature of Bidder)
Business Mailing Address:
Business Location:
(The bidder shall execute the certification of this page prior to submitting his or her proposal.)
Spec. No. 02-'~6
28
StreetStriping2002
WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured
against liability for Worker's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that
code and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.
Witness my hand this 2 (..~"~day of ~, u..~:3~. 5"J' ,200 ~
Signature of Bidder, with Business Address:
Streetstriping2002 ~- 9 Spec. No. 02-16
CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
The bidder represents that he or she has/has not, participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to
either the equal opportunity clause herein or the clause contained in Section 301 of Executive Order 10925; that
he or she has/has not, filed all required compliance reports; and that representations indicating submission of
required compliance prior to subcontract awards.
Signature and address of Bidder:
Date
(This certification shall be executed by the bidder in accordance with Section 60-1.6 of the Regulations of the
President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity for implementing Executive Orders 10925 and 11114.)
Spec. No. 02-'~6 30
StreetStdping2002
LIST OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS
In compliance with the provisions of Sections 4100-4108 of the State Government Code and any amendments
thereof, each bidder shall set forth (a) the name and location of the place of business of each subcontractor who
will perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction site in an amount in
excess of one-half of I percent of the total bid and (b) the portion of the work to be done by each subcontractor.
StreetStriping2002
31
Spec. No. 02-16
STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE OF BIDDER
The bidder is required to state below what work of similar magnitude or character he or she has done and to give
references that will enable the City Council to judge of his or her experience, skill and business standing and his
or her ability to conduct work as completely and rapidly as required under the terms of the contract.
Spec. No. 02-16 32
StreetStriping2002
BID BOND
The American Institute of Architects,
AIA Document No. A310 (February, 1970 Edition)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we
as Principal hereinafter called the Principal, and MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL)
as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto
as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum ofTEN PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE
BID
Dollars ($10% OF BID ), for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the
said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally,
firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for s'tmm~ 81'IPIl~ 2002 -spllc. 190 0:}-16
NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into
a Contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as
may be specified in the bidding or Contract Documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful
performance of such Contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the
prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give such
bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof
between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good
faith contract with another party to perform the Work covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be
null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect.
Signed and sealed this
26th day of ~to6~r , 2002
Witness
Witness
RILE~ ~S S'~RIPING
Principal (Seal)
- Name/Title
MERCHANTS BON~G COMPANY (MUTUAL)
\~"X \ '"',. Sure. ty k '"- (Seal)
DAVID ~T~ ~ISE, Anomey-in-Fact
ORSC 21328 (5/97)
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California.
County of sa~ ataCxa~
On /~;us'r :~6, 2oo:~ before me, Carlla J. Whitescarver, Notary Public, personally
appeared tam/un'm/u ~zisz , personally known to me (or proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person{~-4, whose name~) is~ to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/~ executed the same in
his/~ authorized capacity0es-~, and that by his,+,cr,'t'ncii- signatur~on the
instrument the person(-~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person¢,.) acted, executed
the instrument.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
~~~A._~'~~ Signaturf of'Notary Public~~
Merchants Bonding Company
(Mutual)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know Ali PersOns By These Presents, that the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL), a corporation duly organized under
the laws of the State of Iowa, and having its principal office in the City of Des Moines, County of Polk, State of Iowa, hath made,
constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint
Steven Joseph Reeves, Sharon Lee Maas, Mark Franklin Freeman, David Arthur V~eise
of Lodi and State of California its true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact. with full power
and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver in its behalf as surety any
and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other wdtten obligations in the nature thereof, subject to the limitation that any such
instrument shall not exceed the amount of:.
ONE MILLION ($1,000,000.00) DOLLARS
and to bind the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bond or
undertaking was signed by the duly authorized officers of the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL), and all the acts of
said Attorney-in-Fact, pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed.
This Power-of-Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following Amended SubStituted and Restated By-
Laws adopted by the Board of Directors of the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) on October 3, 1992.
ARTICLE 11, SECTION 8 - The Chairman of the Board or President or any Vice President or Secretary shall have power and
authority to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the Seal of the
Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature
thereof.
ARTICLE 11, SECTION 9 - The signature of any authorized officer and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile
to any Power of Attorney or Certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking,
recognizance, or other suretyship obligations of the Company, and such signature and seal whert so used shall have the
same force and effect as though manually fixed.
I.n Witness Whereof, MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) has caused these presents to be signed by its President and
ks corporate seal to be hereto affixed, this 18th day of April , 2000
STATE OF IOWA
COUNTY OF POLK ss.
MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL)
By
President
STATE OF IOWA
COUNTY OF POLK ss.
On this 18th day of April , 2000 . before me appeared Larry Taylor, to
me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did say l~at he is President of the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL),
the corporation described in the foregoing instrument, and that the Seal affixed to the said instrument is the Corporate Seal of the said
Corporation and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors.
· .
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal at the City of Des Moines. Iowa, the day and year first
above wdtten.
.-* _ ~.. McO %.
. ~,x,, ._. 4 -
.' .~ .. ......... ... -¢~ ..
· ' { ~OWA~ '-
· ·
· '. ·
".. /
eec ~IAI.. ··
IVotao/ Public. Polk County. Iowa
1. William Warner, Jr.. Secretary of the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL), do hereby certi,~/that the above and foregoing
is a true and correct copy of the POWER-OF-AUi'ORNEY executed by said MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL), which is
still in force and effect.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Company on
this 26t_b. day of
;. -,.,\~G cox:
· <~V.'Qpo;.':~'
· =i- -~- o..'--:
·
'.~'_ er '..
MSC 0814 (2~J8)
Secretary
SIGNATURE(S) OF BIDDER
Accompanying this proposal is -"t'~, .b~, ~43.% ~ ~:~
(insert the words "cash ($)", "cashier's check" or "bidder's bond", as the case may be) in an amount equal to at
least 10 percent of the bid.
The names of all persons interested in the foregoing proposal as principals are as follows:
IMPORTANT NOTICE: If bidder or other interested person is a corporation, provide the legal name of corporation
and also the names of the president, secretary, treasurer and manager thereof. If a co-partnership, provide the
true name of firm and also the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If bidder or other interested
person is an individual, provide the first and last names in full.
Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registration of Contractors:
License No. ~,'~ 'I~ '~ ~' ~ , License Expiration Date ~/:~ I/~ ~
Signature(s) of Bidder.~~~' ~-----..
NOTE: If bidder is a corporation, the legal name of the corporation shall be set forth above together with
the signature of the officer or officers authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the corporation; if bidder is
a co-partnership, the true name of the firm shall be set forth above together with the signature of the
partner or partners authorized to sign contracts in behalf of the co-partnership; and if bidder is an
individual, his or her signature shall be placed above. If a member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney
must be on file with the Department prior to opening bids or submitted with the bid; otherwise, the bid will
be disregarded as irregular and unauthorized.
Business address:
Place of residence:
Dated:
StreetStriping2002
33
Spec. No. 02-16
zP. II
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
Note: Bidder shall execute the affidavit on this page prior to submittinq his or her bid.
To City Council, City of Ukiah:
The undersigned in submitting a bid for performing STREET STRIPING 2002 by contract, being duly sworn,
deposes and says:
that he or she has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any
collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with such
contract.
Signature~
Business Address: ~:)5-0 I.~ ~__J~~~ ~,
Place of Residence:
NOTARIZATION
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
Notary ~blic in and for the County of
My Commission Expires /'~ ~
day of H~2 ,2C)~'.~.
StreetStdping2002
, State of California.
Spec. No. 02-16
'~,
o
t-
O
..-,
>
g°
- 6e
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO.
DATE: September 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR
2000 STIP ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR REHABILITATION, SPECIFICATION NO. 02-15 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $527,406.20
SUMMARY: The City distributed specifications to ten builder's exchanges and 12
contractors for the 2000 STIP Arterial / Collector Rehabilitation project. The City publicly
advertised this project on August 11,2002 and August 15, 2002 in the Ukiah Daily Journal.
Two sealed proposals were received and opened by the City Clerk on August 27, 2002.
The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Granite Construction Company of Ukiah,
California with a total bid of $527,406.20. The Engineer's Estimate for the project is
$536,988.30. Caltrans has funded this project in the amount of $539,000 which should
allow for any potential change orders.
If the bid is awarded, compensation for the performance of the work will be based on unit
prices bid for contract item quantities actually installed. Bid totals are based on unit prices
bid for contract items at estimated quantities, and therefore, the actual total paid to the
contractor may be lower or higher than the bid total indicated.
As with construction projects there may be cost overruns by reason of unforeseen work or
because actual quantities installed exceed estimated quantities. Policy Resolution No. 13,
authorizes the responsible Department Head with approval of the City Manager to issue
change orders not to exceed 10 percent of the original contract sum or $5,000 whichever is
greater provided that no change, when added to the original contract sum, exceeds the
amount budgeted for the project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award the contract for 2000 STIP Arterial / Collector
Rehabilitation, Specification No. 02-15, to Granite Construction Company in the amount of
$527,406.20.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS:
readvertise for bids.
Reject all bids and direct staff to
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works/City Engine, e~4~L.~
Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works~~
Candace Horsley, City Manager
~v
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
1. Bid Tabulation
2. Bid Proposal from Granite Construction Company
3. Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget Sheet
APPROVED: '~~...~ ~~'~ ~
Cand~ce ~omley~ City I~anager
AG-Art-CollRehab02-15,SUM ~
ITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT
3
4
5
6
7
CITY OF UKIAH
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
2000 STIP Arterial / Collector Rehabilitation
SPec_i~cation N0:' 72115
Bid Tabulation
Prepared By: Rick Seanor
Fund/Account No. 330-9801-250-000
BID OPENING: AUGUST 27,-~002
Funded Amount = $539.000
. .
i Engineer;s Estimate i Granite Construction Co. i Argon_aut_C0nstruCt0rs`
Ukiah, CA Santa Rosa, CA
DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL ' UNIT - T(~TAL UNIT - TOTAL
PRICE PRICE PRICE
_
I LS Traffic Control $22.000.00 ' $22,000.00 T $17,850.00 - $17,850.00 ~ $66,138-00`- -$66,138_00
3,887 CY iG_rind Ex]_sting R0_adway $24.00 - $93,288.00 $22.00 $$-~'i~,.0~-'- -$~2.00 --$85,5;1~.00
7,876 . TON _As_@~alt Conc_r._e_te ' $53.00 - $417,428100 ~ $53.00 ' $41-~,~;~-8.00 ' $~2.00 - $488,312.00
320 . LF _._B~r_oken W_hite 4" Pa!.nt.e_d Traffic Stripe $0.25 $80.00 - $0.55 - ~$~76~0~ - $0.55 - $176.00
2,924 . LF . ~Broke~ Yellow 4? painted Traffic Stripe $0.25 $731.00 $0.55 $1,608.20 $0.55 $1,608.20
106 . LF ~S_olid Yellg~4" Painte_d.Traffic Stripe . $0.25 ~ __$26.50 .... .$_1 ._00_.~ $106.00_ $1.00~ _ $106._0_0
. 842 ~ LF ~Solid ._White 8" painted Traffic_.St_riPe $0.40 $336.80 $2.00 $1,684.00 $2.00 $1,684.00
245 . LF ~Double._Yellow pai_nted Traffic Stripe _ $0.40. $98.0_0_ ~ $2.00 ~ $490.00. _ _$_2_.0.0 $490.00
1 . LS ?avementMarking . $3,000.00.. $3,000.00. $2,550.00~ $2,550.00_ $2,550.00_ $2,550.00
.
TOTAL $536988.30 TOTAL $527,406.20 TOTAL $646,578.20
Date and Time Printed: 8/27/2002 at 5:10 PM
Filename: BidTab-02-15-Art-Coll-Rehab
BIDDING SCHEDULE
· .
ITEM NO. QUANTITY DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE BID EXTENDED AMOUNT
in writin~ and in fi~ures FOR ITEM
1. 1 LS Traffic Control for the lump sum price qf . ..
2. 3,887 CY Grind,,ard of EXisting~ Road w._ay, ,~,: a d..o. tO~t~,., a~Lf°r a price per cubic
3. 7,876 TON Asphalt Concrete for a price per ton of
4. 320 LF Broken ~ite 4" Painted Tra~c Stripe for a
price per linear foot of
5. 2,924 ~ Broken Ycllo~ 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for a
pric~ per li~ foot of
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
39
Spec. No. 02-15
· 6. 106 LF Solid Yellow 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for a
·
'~. price per linear foot of
($ I~ °-~'
) $
7. 842 LF Solid White 8" Painted Traffic Stripe for a price
per linear foot of
8. 245 LF Double Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe for the
price per linear foot of
~---~o ~ o~-
Pavement Mar~ng for the lump sum price of
9. 1 LS
TOTAL BID AMOUNT
In case of discrepancy between words and figures, the words shall prevail.
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
Spec. No. 02-15
We, the undersigned, further agree, if this proposal shall be accepted, to sign the agreement and to furnish the required
bonds with satisfactory surety, or sureties, within fifteen (15) calendar days after written notice that the contract is ready
for signature; and, if the undersigned shall fail to contract, as aforesaid, it shall be understood that he or she has
abandoned the contract and that, therefore, this proposal shall be null and void and the proposal guaranty accompanying
this proposal, or the amount of said guaranty, shall be forfeited to and become the property of the City. Otherwise, the
proposal guaranty accompanying this proposal shall be returned to the undersigned.
Witness our hands this day of August 27 ,20 02.
Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registration of Contractor's License No. 89 , expiration
date May 31, 20Q3
THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER AND EXPIRATION DATE STATED HEREIN ARE MADE UNDER
PENALTY OF PERJURY.
Signature of bidder or bidders, with business addresses:
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Michael A. Heddinge~c..gacramento Area M~nag~r
P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
(-- SIGN HERE
Notice: In the case of a corporation, give below the addresses of the Principal office thereof and names and addresses of
the President, Secretary, Treasurer.
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
David H. Watts, President P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
Michael Futch, Secretary P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville. CA 95077-5085
Roxanne C. Albritton.Treasurer P.O. BO× 50085 Wat~nv~l]e, CA 95077'5085
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
42
Spec. No. 02- i 5
FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES CERTIFICATION
TO: City of Ukiah Department of Public Works
300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482
The undersigned, in submitting a bid for performing the following work by Contract, hereby certifies that he or she has
or will meet the standards of affirmative compliance with the Fair Employment Practices requirements of the Special
Provisions contained herein.
2000 STIP ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR REHABILITATION
Specification No. 02-15
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
(Signature
of B"' :- ,x:.:...~ ,,~-- ~-'
laaer) Michae1
A. ~inger, Sacramento Area Manager
Business Mailing Address:
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
P.O. BOX 50085
Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
BusinessLocation:
585 West Beach
Street
Watsonville. CA 95076
(The bidder shall execute the certification of this page prior to submitting his or her proposal.)
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
Spec. No. 02-15
WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against
liability for Worker's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and I will
comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.
Witness my hand this 27 day of August
· 20,,02
Signature of Bidder, with Business Address:
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
46
Spec. No. 02-15
CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
The bidder represents that he or she has/has not, participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to either the
equal opportunity clause herein or the clause contained in Section 301 of Executive Order 10925; that he or she has/has
not, filed all required compliance reports; and that representations indicating submission of required compliance prior to
subcontract awards.
Signature and address of Bidder:
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION cOMpANY Date. August 27, 2002
By:
Michael A. Heddinger, S~amento Area Manager
P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
(This certification shall be executed by the bidder in accordance with Section 60-1.6 of the Regulations of the President's
Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity for implementing Executive Orders 10925 and 11114.)
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
48
Spec. No. 02-15
LIST OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS
In compliance with the provisions of Sections 4100-4108 of the State Government Code and any amendments thereof,
each bidder shall set forth (a) the name and location of the place of business of each subcontractor who will perform
work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction site in an amount in excess of one-half of 1
percent of the total bid and (b) the portion of the work to be done by each subcontractor.
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
50
Spec. No. 02-15
STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE OF BIDDER
The bidder is required to state below what work of similar magnitude or character he or she has done and to give
references that will enable the City Council to judge of his or her experience, skill and business standing and his or her
ability to conduct work as completely and rapidly as required under the terms of the contract.
Please See Attached List of Completed Jobs, 1997-2001.
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
52
Spec. No. 02-15
SIGNATURE(S) OF BIDDER
Accompanying this proposal is "Bidder' s Bond"
(insert the words "cash ($)", "cashier's check" or "bidder's bond", as the case may be) in an amount equal to at least 10
percent of the bid.
The names of all persons interested in the foregoing proposal as principals are as follows:
IMPORTANT NOTICE: If bidder or other interested person is a corporation, provide the legal name of
corporation and also the names of the president, secretary, treasurer and manager thereof. If a co-partnership,
provide the true name of firm and also the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If bidder or
other interested person is an individual, provide the first and last names in full.
Please See Attached List of Officers.
Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registration of Contractors:
License No. 89 _, License Expiration Date May 31, 2003..
Michael A. Heddi-nger, S~ramento Area Manager
NOTE: If bidder is a corporation, the legal name of the corporation shall be set forth above together with the
signature of the officer or officers authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the corporation; if bidder is a co-
partnership, the true name of the ftrm shall be set forth above together with the signature of the partner or
partners authorized to sign contracts in behalf of the co-partnership; and if bidder is an individual, his or her
signature shall be placed above. If a member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney must be on file with the
Departni~nt prior to opening bids or submitted with the bid; otherwise, the bid will be disregarded as irregular
and unauthorized.
Businessaddress:_P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
Place of residence:
Dated _August 27, 2002
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
54
Spec. No. 02-15
i-On,
g) o0
0g)
ogg
I~ LU
0 o
i-on,`
~00
---8
~ m
P, IZ
~' z
z
Z
0
Z
Z 03 IJ.!
0 I--, ~
OO:3
0 i.... r~
CITY OF UKIAH
Mendocino County, California
BIDDER'S BOND
· .
that we,
·
Granite
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
Construction Company
, as PRINCIPAL and
Federal Insurance Company
, as SURETY,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Ukiah in the penal sum of 10 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
THE BID of the Principal above named, submitted by said Principal to the City of Ukiah, as the case may be, for the
work described below, for the payment of which sum in lawful money of the United States, well and truly to be made, to
the City Clerk to which said bid was submitted, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors
jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. In no case shall the liability of the surety hereunder exceed the sum of
gren Percent of the Bid Amount (10%) .....
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH,
that whereas the Principal has submitted the above mentioned bid to the City of Ukiah, as aforesaid, for certain
construction specifically described as follows, for which bids are to be opened at the Office of the City Clerk, Ukiah
Civic Center, Ukiah, California, on August 27, 2002 for 2000 STIP ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR
REHABILITATION, SPECIFICATION NO. 02-15.
NOW, THEREFORE, If the aforesaid Principal is awarded the contract and, within the time and manner required under
the specifications, after the prescribed forms are presented to him or her for signatures, enters into a written contract, in
the prescribed form, in accordance with the bid and files two bonds with the City of Ukiah, one to guarantee faithful
performance and the other to guarantee payment for labor and materials, as required by law, then this obligation shall be
null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and virtue.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals on this 22nd day of August
2002 ..
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Michael A. Heddi~ger, ~cramento Area
Principal
Federal Insurance Company
(Seal)
,,(Seal)
(Seal)
Manager
(Seal)
(Seal)
f~_~_~ 't~. ~ (Seal)
Sure¥ E~_~abeth M. Short, Attorney-In-Fact
Address: Two Embarcadero Center t~1500, San Francisco, CA
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
56.
94111
Spec. No. 02-15
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
Note: Bidder shall execute the affidavit on this page prior to submitting his or her bid.
To City Council, City of Ukiah:
The undersigned in submitting a bid for performing 2000 STIP ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR REHABILITATION,
SPECIFICATION NO. 02-15 by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
that he or she has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or
otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with such contract.
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
By: _ ~
Micha 1 A. Heddinger, mento Area Manager
Signature(s) of Bidder
Business Address: P.O. BOX 50085
Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
585 West Beach Street~
Place of Residence: N/A
Watsonville s CA
95076 /
~ae. utg~d,at.l~.~oast Area
NOTARIZATION
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~day of ~_~~_, 20 Os[.
Notary Public in and for the County of
My Commission Expires
, State of California.
,200{,.
Arterial Collector Rehabilitation
58
Spec. No. 02-15
0
0
o
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO.
DATE: September 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR
2000 STIP LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION, SPECIFICATION NO. 02-14 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $367,280.69
SUMMARY: The City distributed specifications to ten builder's exchanges and 15
contractors for the 2000 STIP Local Street Rehabilitation project. The City publicly
advertised this project on August 11,2002 and August 15, 2002 in the Ukiah Daily Journal.
Two sealed proposals were received and opened by the City Clerk on August 27, 2002.
The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Granite Construction Company of Ukiah,
California with a total bid of $367,280.69. The Engineer's Estimate for the project is
$349,905.35. Caltrans has funded this project in the amount of $372,000 which should
allow for any potential change orders.
If the bid is awarded, compensation for the performance of the work will be based on unit
prices bid for contract item quantities actually installed. Bid totals are based on unit prices
bid for contract items at estimated quantities, and therefore, the actual total paid to the
contractor may be lower or higher than the bid total indicated.
As with construction projects there may be cost overruns by reason of unforeseen work or
because actual quantities installed exceed estimated quantities. Policy Resolution No. 13,
authorizes the responsible Department Head with approval of the City Manager to issue
change orders not to exceed 10 percent of the original contract sum or $5,000 whichever is
greater provided that no change, when added to the original contract sum, exceeds the
amount budgeted for the project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award the contract for 2000 STIP Local Street Rehabilitation,
Specification No. 02-14, to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $367,280.69.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS:
readvertise for bids.
Reject all bids and direct staff to
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested
by:
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works/City Engi.ne,e~,~
Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works
Prepared by:
Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Attachments: 1. Bid Tabulation
2. Bid Proposal from Granite Construction Company
3. Fiscal~ear 2002/2003 Budget Sheet
Candace Horsley, (~t~anager
AG-LocalStreet-Rehab02-15.SUM
CITY OF UKIAH
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
2000 STIP Local Street Rehabilitation
Specification No. 02-14
Bid Tabulation
Prepared By: Rick Seanor
Fund/Account No. 330-9802-250-000
BID OPENING: AUGUST 27, 2002
Funded Amount = $372,000
~ Engineer's Estimate Granite Construction Argonaut Constructors
~ i - : Ukiah, CA Santa Rosa, CA
_I?EM NO.i QUANTITY, UNIT i DESCRIPTION i UNIT i, TOTAL UNIT[TOTAL UNIT I TOTAL
I ' ~ PRICE PRICE ~ PRICE
1i LS iTraffic Control I ~ -
i 1518,000.00~ $18,000.00 $30,570.00 $30,570.00 $43,759.00 $43,759.00
183,920 I SY I Slurry Seal I $0.90 $165,528.00 $~.70 $128,744.00 $0.79 $145,296.80
211 CY Edge Grinding $53.00 $149,884.00 $64.00 $180,992.00 . $183,820.00
$24.00 $5,064.00 $60.00 $12,660.00 $16,880.00
142 ! LF Broken White4" Painted Traffic Stripe i $0.25 $35.50 $0.12 $17.04 $17.04
8,290 I LF Broken Yellow4" Painted Traffic Stripe i $0.25 $2,072.50 $0.12 $994.80 $994.80
1,011 LF !Solid Yellow 4" Painted Traffic Stripe I $0.25 $252.75 $0.25 $252.75 $252.75
544 LF I Solid White 8" Painted Traffic Stripe I
, $0.40 . $217.60 $0.50 $272.00 $272.00
i $631.50 $631.50
1,263 LF ]Double Yellow Painted lraffic Stripe $0.40 $505.20 $0.50
1,396 LF ~Bike Lane 4" White Painted Traffic Stripe ~ $0.25 $349.00 $0.25 I $349.00 $0.25 $349.00
2,848 LF Bike Lane 6" White Painted Traffic Stdpe I -
1 LS i Pavement Marking i $0.35 $996.80 $0.45 $1,281.60 $0.45 $1,281.60
$7,000.00 $7,000.00 $10,516.00 $10,516.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00
-i--- I TOTAL ! $349,905.35t '
i TOTAL 15367,280.69 i TOTAL $404,554.49
i
Date and Time Printed: 8/28/2002 at 11:32 AM
Filename: BidTab-02-14-Local-Rehab
BIDDING SCHEDULE
ITEM NO. QUANTITY DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE BID EXTENDED AMOUNT
in writin~ and in fil~ures FOR ITEM
I.
1 LS Traffic Control for,the lump sum price of , _
2. 183,920 SY Slu~y Seal for a price per squ~e yard of
3. 2,828 TON Asphalt Concrete Overlay for a price per ton of
4. 211 CY Edge Grinding for a price per cubic y~d of
,
.
5. 142 LF Broken White 4" Painted Traffic S~ipe for a
price per linear foot of
02-14spec_Local Street Rchab
40
Spec. No. 02-14
T-
6. 8,290 LF Broken Yellow 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for a
price per linear foot of
($ ~,~, ) $__. qct'-i
7. 1,011 LF Solid Yellow 4" Painted Traffic Stripe for a
price per linear foot of
TW~'N T' Y/~ t vLr C~-'/,4~
·
8. 544 LF Solid White 8" Painted Traffic Stripe for a price
per linear foot of
Ft~TY
9. 1,263 LF Double Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe for the
price per linear foot of
..
O
($
)
10. 1,396 LF Bike Lane 4" Whke P~inted Traffic Stripe for
the pric~ per linear fool of
TW~Y F IV~
02-14spec_Local Street Rehab
41
Spec. No. 02-14
~zP.Z
11:
12.
2,848 LF
ILS
Bike Lane 6" White Painted Traffic Stripe for
the price per linear foot of
Pavement Marking for the lump sum price of
T~q T~oc~AN~ r:~VE
TOTAL BID AMOUNT ~]
$ I0.~ IG o~
In case of discrepancy between words and figures; the words shall prevail.
02-14spec_Local Street Rehab
42
Spec. No. 02-14
We, the undersigned, further agree, if this proposal shall be accepted, to sign the agreement and to furnish the required
bonds with satisfactory surety, or sureties, within fifteen (15) calendar days after written notice that the contract is ready
for signature; and, if the undersigned shall fail to. contract, as aforesaid, it shall be understood that he or she has
abandoned the contract and that, therefore, this proposal shall be null and void and the proposal guaranty accompanying
this proposal, or the amount of said guaranty, shhll be forfeited to and become the property of the City. Otherwise, the
proposal guaranty accompanying this proposal shall be returned to the undersigned.
Witness our hands this day of August 27
,2O 02
Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registration of Contractor's License No. 89
expiration date May 31, 200.3
THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER AND EXPIRATION DATE STATED HEREIN ARE MADE UNDER
PENALTY OF PERJURY. ·
Signature of bidder or bidders, with business addresses:
SIGN HERE
Michael A. Hedd--inger,/-S~ramento Area Manager
P_.O. BOX 50085/585 West Beach Street', Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
Notice: In the case ora corporation, give below the addresses of the principal office thereof and names and addresses of
the President, Secretary, Treasurer.
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville~ CA 95077-5085
D~vid, H.,, Watts, Presiden~P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
M~chael Futch, Secretary/P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
Roxanne C. Albritton, Treasure~Pi:O. BOX 50085 Watsonv~lle, CA 95077-5085
Street Rehab
Spec. No. 02-14
.FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES CERTIFICATION
TO:
City of Ukiah Department of Public Works
300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482
The undersigned, in submitting a bid for performing the following work by Contract, hereby certifies that he or she has
or will meet the standards of affirmative compliance with the Fair Employment Practices requirements of the Special
Provisions contained herein.
2000 STIP LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION
Specification No. 02-14
GRANIT- C,~NST~CTf.0N C{]/~PANY
(Signature of Bidder)'Mi-C-~ael'~7~ddinger,
Business Mailing Address:
Sacramento Area Manager
P.O. BOX 50085
Watsonville, CA 95077-508~
BusinessLocation:
585 West Beach Street
Watsonville, CA 95076
·
..~
(The bidder shall execute the ce~ification of this page prior to submitting his or her proposal.)
02-14spec_Local Street Rehab
46
Spec. No. 02-14
WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against
liability for Worker's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and I will
comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.
Witness my hand this 27 day of August ,20 02
Signature of Bidder, with Business Address:
Michael A. Heddinger, S~Eramento Area
Manager
P.O. BOX 50085-
Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
02-14spec_Local Street Rehab
48
Spec. No. 02-14
CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
The bidder represents that he or she has/has not, participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to either the
equal opportunity clause herein or the clause contained in Section 301 of Executive Order 10925; that he or she has/has
not, filed all required compliance reports; and that representations indicating submission of required compliance prior to
subcontract awards.
Signature and address of Bidder:
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO?~.ANY ~
· Date
~ger
August 27, 2002
P.O. BOX 50085
Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
(This certification shall be executed by the bidder in accordance with Section 60-1.6 of the Regulations of the President's
Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity for implementing Executive Orders 10925 and 11114.)
02-14spec_Local Street Rehab
Spec. No. 02-14
LIST OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS
In compliance with the provisiOns of Sections 4100-4108 of the State Government Code and any amendments thereof,
each bidder shall set forth (a) the name and location of the place of business of each subcontractor who,will perform
work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction site in an amount in excess of one-half of 1
percent of the total bid and (b) the portion of the work to be done by each subcontractor.
V'! A_L- IA j CA
02-14spec_Local Street Rchab
52
Spec. No. 02-14
STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE OF BIDDER
The bidder is required to state below what work of similar magnitude or character he or she has done and to give
references that will enable the City Council to judge of his or her experience, skill and business standing and his or her
ability to conduct work as completely and rapidly as required under the terms of the contract.
Please See Attached List of Projects Completed, 1997-2001.
02-14spec_Local Street Rchab
54
Spec. No. 02-14
i-On,·
WOO
0w
~ = o
m'. E 8 = = = c c~ = ,- ,- ,- = ,-- ,-
"" o o '6.-° o o o m .~ .o .o .o
'- ~ '- ~ .9.o=: ,,,--
~ ,,,o ~ o =oo oo oo o ooo
E .EE~~ c~ ~
o ,- . . ?_
o.=~°o~zo~i o~-.~~:~-~~§~.o~~- _
z~__~ ~ ooo oo ~ m~oozz~
~ ·
0 ~
~ ( ~ o o o o oo0
~ -~ - ~ . g~81>~
>
~ · · 0
~ ~ · o ~~ o~ · 8~o
~ ·
0
o~~8~o ~ =- o
~ C
0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
P. ID
t-on'
---8
F-'O
c000
,_
1
,
~' _ I I '~1~
o ~< /~I</SI~ = o : e e :. < < = = .- ,~l~t~°
0
~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C)I ~1 ~i~ 0
~~ ~/~1~i~1~1: ~ ~ ~ '11T°
ol ~1 ~1 = . , , ~ ~1 ol ol ol ~i ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~! ol ~1 ~! ~1 ~,~ :~ ~
: ~ ,~j-~joj~j~jmjmjmj~j~jmj~j~j~j c~ ~j-j
, r 4: C)l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~lOl~l~l,
o~/~ , ~: :/~/J//~l /
~ ; i ~ · ~ ~/,~/~/~/~///11
!.!.1 !.~! ,...I
0~-~
ww~
ill LU ..J
Z
Z t/) UJ
0 I-- r~
Uj UJ -I
SIGNATURE(S) OF BIDDER
Accompanying this proposal is "Bidder ' s Bond"
(insert the words "cash ($)", "cashier's check" or "bidder's bond", as the case may be) in an amount equal to at least 10
percent of the bid.
The names of all persons interested in the foregoing proposal as principals are as follows:
IMPORTANT NOTICE: If bidder or other interested person is a corporation, provide the legal name of
corporation and also the names of the president, secretary, treasurer and manager thereof. If a co-partnership,
provide the true name of firm and also the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If bidder or
other interested person is an individual, provide the first and last names in full.
See Attached List of Officers.
Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registration of Contractors:
LicenseNo. 89 , LiCense Expiration DateMay 31, 2003
Signature(s) of Bidder: By: ~~/'~-~ .~~~~~
Michael A. ~-~-ddJ~n~~, S~cr~ggt~to Area Manager
NOTE: If bidder is a corporation, the legal name of the corporation shall be set forth above together with the
signature of the officer or officers authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the corporation; if bidder is a co-
partnership, the true name of the firm shall be set forth above together with the signature of the partner 'or
panners authorized to sign contracts in behalf of the co-partnership; and if bidder is an individual, his or her
· signature shall be placed above. If a member of a partnership, a Power of Attorney must be on file with the
Department prior to opening bids or submitted with the bid; otherwise, the bid will be disregarded as irregular
and unauthorized.
Businessaddress:P.O. BOX 50085 Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
Place of residence: N/A
Dated
August 27, 2002
02-14spec_Local Street Rehab
56
Spec. No. 02-14
P.O. BOX 50085
WATSONVILLE, CA 95077-5085
(831) 724-1011
State of Incorporation: California
List of Officers
David H. Watts
President
Chief Executive Officer
William G. Dorey
Executive Vice President
Assistant Secretary
Patrick M. Costanzo
Senior Vice President
Assistant Secretary
Mark E. Boitano
Senior Vice President
Assistant Secretary
William E. Barton
Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
Assistant Secretary
Roxane C. Allbritton
Vice President
Treasurer
Assistant Financial Officer
Assistant Secretary
Michael Futch
Garry M. Higdem
Vice President
Secretary
Vice President
Assistant Secretary
James H. Roberts
Vice President
Assistant Secretary
David R. Grazian
Assistant Secretary
Mary G. McCann-Jenni
Michael F. Donnino
' Henry M. Heilbron
Assistant Secretary
Assistant Secretary
Assistant Secretary
Kenneth M. Smith
Assistant Secretary
James M. Cady
Assistant Secretary
Updated 01/01/02
. r
CITY OF UKIAH
Mendocino County, California
BIDDER'S BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
that we,
Granite Construction Company
Federal Insurance Company
· as PRINCIPAL and
· as SURETY,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Ukiah in the penal sum of 10 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
THE BID of the Principal above named, submitted by said Principal to the City of Ukiah, as the case may be, for the
work described below, for the payment of which sum in lawful money of the United States, well and truly to be made, to
the City Clerk to which said bid was submitted, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors
jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. In no case shall the liability of the surety hereunder exceed the sum of
S Ten Percent of the Bid Amount ($10%) ....
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH~
that whereas the Principal has submitted the above mentioned bid to the City of Ukiah, as aforesaid, for certain
construction specifically described as follows, for which bids are to be opened at the Office of the City Clerk, Ukiah
Civic Center, Ukiah, California, on' August 27, 2002 for 2000 STIP LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION,
SPECIFICATION NO. 02-14.
NOW, THEREFORE, If the aforesaid Principal is awarded the contract and, within the time and manner reqUired under
the specifications, after the prescribed forms are presented to him or her for signatures, enters into a written contract, in
the prescribed form, in accordance with the bid and files two bonds with the City of Ukiah, one to guarantee faithful
performance and the other to guarantee payment for labor and materials, as required by law, then this obligation shall be
null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and virtue.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals on this
20 02
(Seal)
Michael A. Heddinger. Sa~amento Area
Principal Manager
(Seal)
(Seal)
22nddayofAu§ust
(Seal)
Federal Insurance Company (Seal)
~ 1~;~/'h /]')- ' (~--~-~/'" (Seal)
Surety Eli~-e~h M. Short, Attorney-In-Fact
Address: Two Embarcadero center #1500, San Francisco, CA
94111
02-14spec_Local Street Rehab
58
Spec. No. 02-14
AGENDA
SUMMARY
6g
ITEM NO.
DATE: September 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT:
AWARD ACQUISITION Of 2-AXLE TRUCK WITH DUMP BODY TO EAST
BAY FORD TRUCK SALES IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,625.43 FOR THE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SUMMARY: The City Public Works Department worked with the Purchasing Department
to obtain bids for the acquisition of a new 2003, 2-axle truck with dump body as a
replacement for City vehicle number 2331, a 1991 dump truck. Sixteen companies
received requests for quotations including all new truck dealers in the Ukiah Valley. A
notice requesting bids for the 2-axle truck with dump body was published in the Ukiah Daily
Journal on July 14 and 19, 2002. One sealed proposal was received and opened by the
City Clerk on July 29, 2002.
The Iow bidder is East Bay Ford Truck Sales of Oakland, CA, which quoted a price of
$57,625.43 for a 2003 Ford F-750 2-axle truck with dump body. The bid amount of
$57,625.43 is within the City's budget of $60,000 for this truck as shown on Attachment 1.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award acquisition of 2-axle truck with dump body to East Bay
Ford Truck Sales in the amount of $57,625.43 for the Department of Public Works.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: 1. Not award acquisition of 2-axle truck
with dump body. 2. Direct staff to readvertise for bids.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works / City Engineer~r~
Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works~
Candace Horsley, City Manager
T
1. Fiscal Year 2002 / 2003 Budget Sheet
APPROVED:
Candace Horsley, City I~anager
AG-2-axleTruck-durnp-body. SUM
0
0
0
o
i_
6h
ITEM NO.
DATE: September 4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID FOR VARIOUS POLE AND PAD MOUNT TRA~NSFORMERS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,537.28 TO VARIOUS VENDORS
The formal bid process was followed in sending a Request for
Quotation (R.F.Q.) to five suppliers for seven different size
transformers. Five formal bids were opened by the City Clerk on
August 15, 2002, at 2:00 p.m. These bidders were:
1. WESCO
2. Western States Electric (bidding on both Cooper & Pauwels)
3. G.E. Supply Company
4. Wrathall & Krusi
5. Stevens, McCarthy, Landcaster, LLC
Bids were evaluated relative to price, delivery time, load losses,
and availability of circuit protection. The bids are total cost,
including tax and shipping. Based on staff's evaluation, the lowest
compliant bidder for each unit is as summarized in the attached
table. The transformers will be placed in warehouse stock and will
be charged out on a project-by-project basis. The equipment has
been budgeted in the 2002/03 Fiscal Year in Account
800.3646.690.000. Sufficient funds are available.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award bids totaling $55,537.28 as follows:
Three 75 KVA 240V pole mount transformers and one 300 KVA 480Y pad
mount transformer to Western States Electric (Cooper) for
$11,045.68; one 75 KVA 208Y, three 150 KVA, two 225 KVA, and one
300 KVA 208Y pad mount transformers to Wesco for $37,047.38; and
one 500 KVA pad mount transformer to Central Maloney, Inc. c/o
Stevens, McCarthy, Landcaster, LLC for $7,444.22.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Reject all bids and direct
staff to re-advertise and re-solicit bids.
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested by: Stan Bartolomei, Electric Supervisor
Prepared by: Judy Jenney, Purchasing & Warehouse Assistant
Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager
Attachments: Bid Tabulation
APPROVED:~~
Candace Horsley~ City Manager
H ~
0
[-~
U
0
I-I
H
0
·
·
0 ~ ~
Z Z
00
H H
oo
0 0
00
O O
oo 8
ZZZZ
0000
UUUU
o~o~ 8
UUUU ~
H
0 0
oo ~o
DDDDDD~
~) (~ c~
0
0
o~oo
ITEM NO.
DATE:
6i
September 4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SETTING THE LIMITATION ON CITY
EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003
The passage of Proposition 4 in 1979 (Article XIIIB of the California
Constitution), requires local governments to prepare a statement of
appropriations limitation. Also, each of the governing bodies must pass
a resolution setting the appropriations limit for each budget year.
The City's appropriation growth rate is limited to the change in the
County's population and the change in California's per capita personal
income. Exhibit A, attached to the proposed resolution for fiscal year
2002-2003, sets forth the calculations necessary to establish the
appropriations limit for the City of Ukiah's 2002-2003 fiscal year. For
this calculation, each revenue source and General Fund transfer, listed
in the adopted budget, must be allocated as "proceeds from taxes" or
"non-proceeds from taxes."
Adoption of this resolution assures the community and the State of
California that the appropriations approved do not exceed the City's
annual appropriations limit. For fiscal year 2002-2003 the calculations
show a limit of $24.0 million ($23,977,904) and appropriations subject
to the limit of $6.7 million. This provides a large margin of safety
($17.3 million) before compliance with this law would become a concern.
For the first time, since before FY 1988-89, the expenditure limit
actually decreased. The limit for FY 2001-2002 was $139,614 greater
than the new limit for FY 2002-2003. The available funds subject to the
limit are still less than one-third of the limit. Therefore, this
reduction has no effect on the City's budget. The significance is the
fact that state-wide per capita income decreased by 1.27%.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution fixing
limitations on City expenditures for Fiscal Year 2002-2003.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1). Adopt resolution fixing limitation on City
expenditures for Fiscal Year 2002-2003.
ALTERNATE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS:
modifications
Adopt resolution with .
Prepared by: Gordon Elton, Finance Director
Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager
Attachments:
1) FY 2002-2003 Appropriation limitation Resolution, with
attachment.
2) State of California, Department of Finance "PRICE AND
POPULATION INFORMATION" letter dated May 1, 2002.
APPROVED:
GE:GANNLIMT.AGN
Candace Horsley,~City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF UKIAH FIXING LIMITATION ON CITY
EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003
WHEREAS, the provisions of Proposition 4, (Article XIII B of the California Constitution), the
spending initiative, passed by the voters of the State of California, place a limitation on the expenditures of
governmental agencies; and
WHEREAS, the above referenced legislation requires the City of Ukiah to establish its appropriation
limit for the 2002-2003 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Finance of the City of Ukiah has computed the limitation of the City of
Ukiah for the 2002-2003 fiscal year in accordance with the provisions thereof in the amount of $23,977,904;
and
WHEREAS, the appropriation limitation for the 2002-2003 fiscal year was determined by utilizing the
change in California per capita income for the 2002-2003 fiscal year and the percentage of population
change within Mendocino County as estimated by the State of California, Department of Finance estimates
as of January 1, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the budgetary appropriation limitation of the City of
Ukiah for fiscal year 2002-2003 is hereby fixed at $23,977,904, as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and made a part hereof by this reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of September 2002, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip Ashiku, Mayor
Marie Ulvila, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2003-
Page I of 1
CITY OF UKIAH
SCHEDULE TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE
WITH PROPOSITIONS 4 & 111 APPROPRIATION LIMIT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2003
Based on Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Budget
EXHIBIT "A"
A) PROCEEDS OF TAXES
B) LESS: EXCLUSIONS
C) APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMITATION
$6,930,827
$212,740
$6,718,087
D) CURRENT YEAR LIMIT
E)
AMOUNT UNDER THE LIMIT
(MARGIN OF SAFETY)
$23,977,904
$17,259,817
Gann45
Page I of 5
CITY OF UKIAH
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO GANN LIMIT
1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003
LIMIT PRIOR YEAR
$19,829,779 $20,978,877 $22,323,668 $24,117,518
TIMES:
% CHANGE IN CALIFORNIA
PER CAPITA INCOME (a) (b)
OR
% GROWTH IN NON.RESIDENTIAL
ASSESSED VALUATION
1.0453 1.0491 1.0782 0.9873
n/a n/a n/a n/a
AND TIMES:
% POPULATION CHANGE
CITY (a)
OR
% POULATION CHANGE
COUNTY (a) (c)
1.0073 1.0073 0.9978 1.006
1.0121 1.0143 1.002 1.007
NEW LIMIT
$20,978,877 $22,323,668 $24,117,518 $23,977,904
NOTES:
(a) State of California, Department of Finance estimates, May 2002
I(b) Factor Chosen for calculation, by default.
l(c) Factor Chosen for calculation.
Gann45
Page 2 of 5
CITY OF UKIAH
PROPOSITIONS 4 AND 111, APPROPRIATION LIMIT
SCHEDULE TO CATEGORIZE BUDGETED REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003
REVENUE SOURCE
TAXES
PROPERTY TAXES
SALES & USE TAXES
PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX
ROOM OCCUPANCY TAX
BUSINESS LICENSE TAX
FRANCHISE TAX
FRANCHISE IN-LIEU CITY UTILITIES
OTHER TAXES
LICENSES AND PERMITS
BICYCLE LICENSES
BUILDING PERMITS
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
PLUMBING PERMITS
MECHANICAL PERMITS
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
FINES & PENALTIES
I NTERGOVERN MENTAL
MOTOR VEHICLE IN LIEU
TRAILER COACH FEES
OFF HIGHWAY LICENSES
TAX RELIEF
ERAF REFUNDS
P.O.S..T. REIMBURSEMENTS
COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT
MISC. PARTICIPATIONS
STATE MANDATED COST REIMBURSEMENT
USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
INTEREST
RENT
SUN HOUSE REVENUE
CONCESSION INCOME
RECREATION PROGRAM INCOME
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS
PROCEEDS
OF TAXES
$527,800
$3,845,700
$30,000
$390,000
$265,000
$675,000
$867,968
$o
$5o0
$14,000
$314,859
NON-PROCEEDS
OF TAXES
$441,000
$150
$80,000
$1o,ooo
$8,ooo
$5,000
$33,908
$55,575
$0
$25,000
$500
$1,134
$20,000
$111,541
$210,990
$8,60o
$o
$263,500
$267,00O
Gann45
Page 3 of 5
CITY OF UKIAH
PROPOSITIONS 4 AND 111, APPROPRIATION LIMIT
SCHEDULE TO CATEGORIZE BUDGETED REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003
REVENUE SOURCE
PROCEEDS
OF TAXES
NON-PROCEEDS
OF TAXES
CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
SUBD PLANNING FEES
SUBDIVISION FEES
GENERAL PLAN FEES
EMERGENCY RESPONSE REIM
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FI RE DEPT
SALE OF MATERIALS
SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY
AMBULANCE FEES
WEED ABATEMENT
VEHICLE ABATEMENT
PLAN CHECK FEES
SWIMMING POOL
LATE CHARGES/PENALTIES
LABOR OVERHEAD REIMBURSEMENT
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
$23,200
$5,85o
$o
$17,000
$51,5oo
$16,050
$o
$o
$420,000
$o
$10,000
$45,000
$32,000
$o
$o
$4,700
$6,930,827 $2,167,198 $9,098,025
ENTERPRISE & OTHER FUNDS
$35,126,689 $35,126,689
TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES
ADD: TRANSFERS INTO GENERAL FUND
$6,930,827
$37,293,887
$0
$44,224,714
TOTAL PROCEEDS OF TAXES
$6,930,827
TOTAL NON-PROCEEDS OF TAXES
$37,293,887
Gann45
Page 4 of 5
CITY OF UKIAH
SCHEDULE OF EXCLUDED APPROPRIATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 BUDGET
QUALIFIED CAPITAL OUTLAYS
LEASE/PURCHASE PAYMENTS
FIRE TRUCK (lOO.21Ol)
CIVIC CENTER (100.XXXX. 330.O00)
STREET EQUIPMENT (lOO.311o)
AMOUNT
$0
$212,740
$o
$212,740
CITY OF UKIAH
ALLOCATION OF INTEREST- TO TAX & NON-TAX PROCEEDS
FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 BUDGET
A) TAX PROCEEDS LESS INTEREST - GENERAL FUND
B) LESS; EXCLUDED APPROPRIATIONS
C) NET TAX PROCEEDS
D) TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES, LESS INTEREST
E)
NET TAX PROCEEDS, AS PERCENT OF
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
F) TOTAL INTEREST
G) AMOUNT OF INTEREST EARNED FROM TAXES
H)
AMOUNT OF INTEREST EARNED
FROM NON-PROCEEDS OF TAXES
$6,615,968
$212,740
$6,403,228
$8,671,625
74%
$426,400
$314,859
$111,541
Gann45
Page 5 of 5
- Attachment #2
May 1,2002
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
The California Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 2227, mandates the Department of Finance
(Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments.
Each local jurisdiction uses their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2002, in
conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit
for fiscal year 2002-03. Enclosure I provides the change in California's per capita personal
income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to
calculate the 2002-03 appropriations limit. Enclosure II provides city and unincorporated county
population percentage changes, and Enclosure IIA provides county and incorporated areas
population percentage changes. The population percentage change data excludes federal and
state institutionalized populations and military populations, as noted.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and
Taxation Code, Section 2228, for the various population options available to special districts to
assess population change in their district. Article XIII B, Section 9, of the State Constitution
exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. Special
districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part
of their annual audit. No State agency reviews the appropriations limit.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. Revenue and Taxation
Code 11005.6, mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds
the current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify the
higher estimate to the State Controller by June 3, 2002.
Address questions about the price and population data to the Demographic Research Unit at
(916) 323-4086.
Sincerely,
B. TIMOTHY GAGE
Director
Enclosure
Page 1
Attachment #2
May 1, 2002
Enclosure I
A.
Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their
cost-of-living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing
body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the
percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage
change to be used in setting the 2002-2003 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year
(FY)
Percentage change
over prior year
2002-2003 -1.27
B,
Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2002-2003
appropriations limit.
2002-2003:
Per Capita Change = -1.27 percent
Population Change = 1.83 percent
Per Capita converted to a ratio:
- 1.27 + 1 O0
100
= 0.9873
Population converted to a ratio:
1.83 + 1 O0
100
= 1.0183
Calculation of factor for FY 2002-2003: 0.9873 x 1.0183 = 1.0054
Page 2
Attachment #2
Enclosure II
Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change
City/County/State
ICALIFORNIA
January 1, 2001
34,385,O00
January 1, 2002
35,037,00
Pe~ent
Change
2001-2002
1.9%
MENDOCINO
FORT BRAGG
POINT ARENA
UKIAH
WILLITS
UNINCORPORATED
87,100
7,075
48O
15,600
5,100
58,800
87,700
7,100
48O
15,700
5,100
59,40O
0.7%
0.4%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
1.0%
E-1RepoA 2002
Page 3
ITEM NO.
DATE: September4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: REPORT OF THE ACQUISITION OF AUTOCAD 2002 CIVIL SERIES FROM
DLT SOLUTIONS INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,139.42
SUMMARY: In compliance with Section 1522 of the City Code, this report is being
submitted to the City Council for the purpose of reporting the acquisition of supplies costing
more than $5,000 but less than $10,000. The Department of Public Works used DLT
Solutions Inc. to acquire one upgrade of the AutoCAD 2000 software to the AutoCAD 2002
Civil Series. The AutoCAD 2002 Civil Series software is an integral part of our ability to
survey and design Public Works facilities.
DLT Solutions has proprietary rights on this software and there are no other available
vendors. Therefore no other prices were sought by the Department of Public Works or the
Purchasing Department.
The purchase amount of $5,139.42 (tax included)is less than the Public Works AutoCAD
upgrade budget amount of $6,000 in account 100.3001.800.000
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file report of the acquisition of AutoCAD 2002
Civil Series from DLT Solutions Inc in the amount of $5,139.42.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Tim Eriksen, Civil Engineer
Candace Horsley, City Manager
1. Fiscal Year 2002/2003 budget sheet
Candace Horsley, C'I~/Manager
I-
Z
I, LI
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO.
DATE: September 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT:
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NOS. 771 AND 772 TO
ADMINISTERING AGENCY- STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE FUNDED
PROJECTS NO. 000049- STIP REHABILITATION PROJECTS
SUMMARY: The City of Ukiah has been authorized to receive funding for the following
projects: 2000 STIP Local Street Rehabilitation, Specification Number 02-14, Project No.
RPL-5049 (011), EA: 01-280494 and 2000 STIP Arterial/Collector Rehabilitation,
Specification Number 02-15, Project No. RPL-5049 (012), EA: 01-280504. These projects
are expected to be constructed within the next three months. The attached Program
Supplement Nos. 771 and 772 are the mechanisms by which the State transfers funds to
the City for reimbursement of authorized project costs totaling $911,000. Staff
recommends adoption of the attached resolution authorizing the execution of the program
supplements.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of
Program Supplement Nos. 771 and 772 to Administering Agency - State Agreement for
State Funded Projects No. 000049.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Elect not to receive project reimbursement
and do not adopt resolution.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works / City Enginee~_4~.5
Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works~~- "~
Candace Horsley, City Manager
1. Resolution for Adoption
2. Program Supplement No. 771
3. Program Supplement No. 772
Candace Horsley, City M~ager
AGprogSupp771-772.SUM
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NOS. 771 AND 772
TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY- STATE AGREEMENT
FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO. 000049
WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah has been authorized to receive state funding for the following
projects: 2000 STIP Local Street Rehabilitation, Specification Number 02-14, Project No.
RPL-5049 (011), EA: 01-280494 and 2000 STIP Arterial/Collector Rehabilitation, Specification Number
02-15, Project No. RPL-5049 (012), EA: 01-280504; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ukiah has previously executed the Agency-State Agreement (Master
Agreement) with an effective date of May 17, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the Program Supplement must be executed between the Agency and the State prior
to the Agency receiving state funding reimbursement for eligible project costs related to
Project Nos. RPL-5049(011) and RPL-5049(012).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Ukiah
approves the execution of Program Supplement Nos. 771 and 772 and authorizes the Mayor to execute
same.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Phillip Ashiku, Mayor
Marie Ulvila, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2003-
Page 1 of 1
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 771
to
ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO. 000049
Date: July 24, 2002
Location: 01-MEN-0-UK/
Project Number: RPL-5049(011)
E.A. Number : 01_280494
Locode: 5049
This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, effective 04/25/2002, is hereby incorporated into the Administering Agency - State Agreement
No. 000049 for State Funded Projects entered into between the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the STATE with an effective date
of 05/17/99 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is adopted in accordance with
Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the
ADMINISTERING AGENCY on (See copy attached).
The ADMINISTERING AGENCY further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds encumbered to this project, it accepts
and will comply with the Special Covenants and Conditions set forth on the following pages.
PROJECT LOCATION:
Uldah - various city streets - pavement rehabilitation
TX~E OF WORK: Road Rehabilitation
Estimated Cost
$377,000.00
CITY OF UKIAH
State Funds
STATE $372~
LOCAL
$5,000.00
Matching Funds
$0.00
OTHER
$0.00
By
Date
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By
Chief, Office of Project Im~lementatic
Division of Local Assistance
Title
Date
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
~ S t--~tute----~ L Item Year Pr /ram B C Category [ Fund Source
106 2001 2660-101-042 2001-2002 20.30.600.621 N 262040 042-T
$372,000.00
372,000.00
Program Supplement 00-0049-771- SERIAL
Page i of 4
01-MEN.0-UKI
R.~L-5049(011)
07/24/2002
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
1. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse the STATE for the
ADMINISTERING AGENCY share of costs for work requested to be
performed by the STATE.
2. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will advertise, award and administer
this project in accordance with the most current published Local
Assistance Procedures Manual.
3. All project repair, replacement and maintenance involving the
physical condition and the operation of project improvements
referred to in Article III MAINTENANCE, of the aforementioned
Master Agreement will be the responsibility of the ADMINISTERING
AGENCY and shall be performed at regular intervals and as
required for efficient operation of the completed project
improvements.
4. This PROJECT is programmed to receive funding from the 1998 State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), as amended. Funding
may be provided under one or more components. A component(s)
specific fund allocation is required, in addition to other
requirements, before reimbursable work can occur for the
component(s) identified. Each allocation will be assigned an
effective date and identify the amount of funds allocated per'
component(s).
..
This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT has been prepared to allow reimbursement
of eligible PROJECT expenditures for the component(s) allocated.
The start of reimbursable expenditures is restricted to the later
of either 1) the effective date of the Master Agreement, 2)the
effective date of the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, or 3)the effective date
of the component specific allocation.
5. STATE andADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that additional funds made
available by future allocations will be encumbered on this
PROJECT by use of a STATE approved Allocation Letter and Finance
Letter. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that STATE funds available
for reimbursement will be limited to the amount allocated by the
California Transportation Commission (CTC) and/or the STATE.
6. This PROJECT is subject to the timely use of funds provisions
enacted by Senate Bill 45 (SB 45), approved in 1997, and
subsequent CTC guidelines and State procedures approved by the
CTC and STATE, as outlined below:
Program Supplement 00-0049-771- SERIAL
Page 2 of 4
01-MEN:-0-UKI
P(PL-5049(O11)
07/24/2002
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
Funds allocated for the environmental & permits, plan
specifications a estimate, and right-of-way components are
available for expenditure until the end of the second fiscal year
following the year in which the funds were allocated.
Funds allocated for the construction component are subject to an
award deadline and contract completion deadline. ADMINISTERINO
AOENCY agrees to award the contract within 12 months of the
construction fund allocation and complete the construction or
vehicle purchase contract within 36 months of award.
7. Upon ADMINISTERIN~ A~ENCY request, the CTC and/or STATE may
approve supplementary allocations, time extensions, and fund
transfers between components. An approved time extension will
revise the timely use of funds criteria, outlined above, for the
component(s) and allocation(s) requested. Approved supplementary
allocations, time extensions, and fund transfers between
components, made after the execution of this PRO~RAM SUPPLEMENT
will be documented and considered subject to the terms and
conditions thereof.
Documentation for approved supplementary allocations, time
extensions, and fund transfers between components, will be a
STATE approved Allocation Letter, Fund Transfer Letter, Time
Extension Letter, and Finance Letter· as appropriate.
8. This PROJECT will be administered in accordance with the CTC STIP
~uidelines, as adopted or amended, and the STATE Procedures for
Administering Local ~rant Projects in the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), the Local Assistance Program
Ouidelines, and the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. The
submittal of invoices for project costs shall be in accordance
with the above referenced Publications and the following.
9. The ADMINISTERIN~ A~ENCY shall invoice STATE for environmental a
permits plans s ' ' ·
· pecmfxcatxons & estimate, and right-of-way costs
no later than 180 days after the end of last eligible fiscal year
of expenditure. For construction costs, the ADMINISTERIN~ A~ENCY
has 180 days after project completion to make the final payment
to the contractor and prepare the final Report of Expenditures
and final invoice· and submit to STATE for verification and
Program Supplement00-0049_771_ SERIAL Page 3 of 4
01-MEN-0-UKI
1/,.PL-5049(011)
07/24/2002
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
payment.
10. Ail obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are
subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and
the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and
reimbursement are available only upon the passage of the State
Budget Act containing these STATE funds.
11. Award information shall be submitted by the ADMINISTERING AOENCY
to the District Local Assistance Engineer immediately after the
project contract award. Failure to do so will cause a delay in
the State processing invoices for the construction phase. Please
refer to Section 15.7 "Award Package,, of the Local Assistance
Procedures Manual.
12. ADMINISTERING AOENCY agrees that it will only proceed with work
authorized for specific phase(s) with an "Authorization to
Proceed" and will not proceed with future phase(s) of this
project prior to receiving an "Authorization to Proceed" from the
STATE for that phase(s) unless no further State or Federal funds
are needed for those future phase(s).
Program supplement 00- 0049-771- SERIAL
Page 4 of 4
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 772
to
ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO. 000049
Date: July 24, 2002
Location: 01-MEN-0-UK/
Proj eot Number :RPL.5049(012)
E.A. Number:01_280504
Locode: 5049
This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, effective 04/25/2002, is hereby incorporated into the Administering Agency - State Agreement
No. 000049 for State Funded Projects entered into between the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the STATE with an effective date
of 05/17/99 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is adopted in accordance with
Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the
ADMINISTERING AGENCY on (See copy attached).
The ADMINISTERING AGENCY further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds encumbered to this project, it accepts
and will comply with the Special Covenants and Conditions set forth on the following pages.
PROJECT LOCATION:
Uldah - various locations - pavement rehabilitation
TYPE OF WORK: Road Rehabilitation
Estimated Cost
$545,000.00
CITY OF UKIAH
State Funds
STATE $539,000.00
LOCAL
$6,000.00
Matching Funds
$0.00
OTHER
$0.00
By
Date
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
Chief, Office of Project Im~lementatic
Division of Local Assistance
Title
Date
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
Accounting Offie~~_~~~~~~~ Date ~-~q, 0 ~ $539,000.00
Chapter Statutes
-- I __. ------ Fund Source ~UNT
106 2001
042-T 539,000.00
Program Supplement 00-0049-772- SERIAL
Page i of 4
01-MEN~.0-UKI 07/24/2002
RPL-5049(012)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
1. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse the STATE for the
ADMINISTERING AGENCY share of costs for work requested to be
performed by the STATE.
2. The ADMINISTERING AOENCY will advertise, award and administer
this project in accordance with the most current published Local
Assistance Procedures Manual.
3. All project repair, replacement and maintenance involving the
physical condition and the operation of project improvements
referred to in Article III MAINTENANCE, of the aforementioned
Master Agreement will be the responsibility of the ADMINISTERING
AGENCY and shall be performed at regular intervals and as
required for efficient operation of the completed project
improvements.
4. This PROJECT is programmed to receive funding from the 1998 State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), as amended. Funding
may be providedunder one or more components. A component(s)
specific fund allocation is required, in addition to other
requirements, before reimbursable work can occur for the
component(s) identified. Each allocation will be assigned an
effective date and identify the amount of funds allocated per
component(s).
..
This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT has been prepared to allow reimbursement
of eligible PROJECT expenditures for the component(s) allocated.
The start of reimbursable expenditures is restricted to the later
of either 1) the effective date of the Master Agreement, 2)the
effective date of the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, or 3)the effective date
of the component specific allocation.
5. STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that additional funds made
available by future allocations will be encumbered on this
PROJECT by use of a STATE approved Allocation Letter and Finance
Letter. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that STATE funds available
for reimbursement will be limited to the amount allocated by the
California Transportation Commission (CTC) and/or the STATE.
6. This PROJECT is subject to the timely use of funds provisions
enacted by Senate Bill 45 (SB 45), approved in 1997, and
subsequent CTC guidelines and State procedures approved by the
CTC and STATE, as outlined below:
Program Supplement 00-0049-772- SERIAL
Page 2 of 4
¢ 1-MEN-0-UK/
RPL-5049(012)
07/24/2002
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
Funds allocated for the environmental & permits, plan
specifications & estimate, and right-of-way components are
available for expenditure until the end of the second fiscal year
following the year in which the funds were allocated.
Funds allocated for the construction component are subject to an
award deadline and contract completion deadline. ADMINISTERING
AGENCY agrees to award the contract within 12 months of the
construction fund allocation and complete the construction or
vehicle purchase contract within 36 months of award.
7. Upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY request, the CTC and/or STATE may
approve supplementary allocations, time extensions, and fund
transfers between components. An approved time extension will
revise the timely use of funds criteria, outlined above, for the
component(s) and allocation(s) requested. Approved supplementary
allocations, time extensions, and fund transfers between
components, made after the execution of this PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
will be documented and considered subject to the terms and
conditions thereof.
Documentation for approved supplementary allocations, time
extensions, and fund transfers between components, will be a
STATE approved Allocation Letter, Fund Transfer Letter, Time
Extension Letter, and Finance Letter, as appropriate.
8. This PROJECT will be administered in accordance with the CTC STIP
~uidelines, as adopted or amended, and the STATE Procedures for
Administering Local Grant Projects in the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), the Local Assistance Program
Guidelines, and the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. The
submittal of invoices for project costs shall be in accordance
with the above referenced Publications and the following.
9. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall invoice STATE for environmental &
permits, plans specifications & estimate, and right-of-way costs
no later than 180 days after the end of last eligible fiscal year
of expenditure. For construction costs, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY
has 180 days after project completion to make the final payment
to the contractor and prepare the final Report of Expenditures
and final invoice, and submit to STATE for verification and
Program Supplement 00-0049-772- SERIAL
Page 3 of 4
-MEN.0-UKI 07/24/2002
RPL-5049(012)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
payment.
10. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are
subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and
the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and
reimbursement are available only upon the passage of the State
Budget Act containing these STATE funds.
11. Award information shall be submitted by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY
to the District Local Assistance Engineer immediately after the
project contract award. Failure to do so will cause a delay in
the State processing invoices for the construction phase. Please
refer to Section 15.7 "Award Package" of the Local Assistance
Procedures Manual.
12.ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will only proceed with work
authorized for specific phase(s) with an "Authorization to
Proceed" and will not proceed with future phase(s) of this
project prior to receiving an "Authorization to Proceed" from the
STATE for that phase(s) unless no further State or Federal funds
are needed for those future phase(s).
Program supplement 00-0049-772- SERIAL
Page
4 of 4
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO.
6'1
DATE: September 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION RESTORING ONE ON-STREET PARKING
SPACE AT 493 HIGHLAND AVENUE
SUMMARY: Currently there is no parking permitted along both sides of Highland Avenue.
Mr. Paul Zellman, who resides at 493 Highland Avenue, requested permission to restore one
on-street parking space adjacent to his property. At this address there is room to allow one
parking space off the traveled way (in the shoulder area outside the white reflectors which
mark the street edge line) as shown on the map, Attachment 2. Staff contacted both the
Police Department and the Fire Department regarding this request. Neither Department
objected to the request to restore the parking space.
The Traffic Engineering Committee (TEC) considered the request to restore one on-street
parking space at its meeting on February 19, 2002. The TEC approved the request and
recommends that the City Council restore one on-street parking space at 493 Highland
Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution restoring one on-street parking space at
493 Highland Avenue.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Do not adopt resolution and provide direction
to staff.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
Mr. Paul Zellman
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works / City Engineer~L~
Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works
Candace Horsley, City Manager
1. Resolution for Adoption
2. Map of 493 Highland Avenue
APPROVED~.
Candace Horsley, ~it~Manager
RJS: AG-493Highland-RestoreParking
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH
RESTORING ONE ON-STREET PARKING SPACE AT 493 HIGHLAND AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council may by resolution designate portions of streets upon which the
standing, parking, or stopping of vehicles is prohibited or restricted pursuant to Article 11, Chapter 1,
Division 8 of the Ukiah City Code; and
WHEREAS, there are currently no parking zones on both sides of Highland Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Traffic Engineering Committee (Traffic Engineer) considered a request to restore
one on-street parking space at 493 Highland Avenue within the City of Ukiah; and
WHEREAS, the Traffic Engineer recommends the request to restore one on-street parking space
at 493 Highland Avenue;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Ukiah does
restore one on-street parking space, at a location near 493 Highland Avenue. The City Engineer shall
determine the appropriate signage necessary to restore the on-street parking space.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Phillip Ashiku, Mayor
Marie Ulvila, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2003-
Page 1 of I
®
i~T'r'R4H MEAiT ~
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO.
DATE: September 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE AGREEMENT
WITH EBA ENGINEERING IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $44,421.50
FOR CONTINUING SOIL AND GROUNDWATER PLUME DEFINITION AT
THE CORPORATION YARD AND APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $16,015
SUMMARY: In April 2002, EBA Engineering, (EBA) on behalf of the City of Ukiah, submitted
a Work Plan for Continuing Soil and Groundwater Plume Definition at the Corporation Yard to
the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (NCRWQCB). In response to the
anticipated NCRWQCB approval of the work plan, staff obtained a cost estimate from EBA
Engineering for completion of the work plan and related quarterly groundwater monitoring
(Attachment 2). By letter dated August 15, 2002, (Attachment 3) the NCRWQCB directed the
City to proceed with the work identified in the work plan and prepare a report to further
delineate the vertical and horizontal extent of soil and groundwater contamination associated
with the old fueling facility at the Corporation Yard. This report must be submitted to the
NCRWQCB by December 31, 2002.
continued on page 2
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement
with EBA Engineering in an amount not to exceed $44,421.50 for Continuing Soil and
Groundwater Plume Definition at the Corporation Yard.
2. Approve an amendment to the 2002/2003 budget increasing expenditures in account
100.3301.250.000 by $16,015.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: Direct staff to seek proposals from other
firms and report back to Council.
Citizen Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works / City Engineer~,~3
Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works
Candace Horsley, City Manager
1. Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement
2. Cost Estimate from EBA Engineering
3. Letter from NCRWQCB
4. Agreement for Professional Consulting Services
5. Fiscal Year 2002 / 2003 budget sheet
6. Budget Worksheet
~.~~.~.Rr. rc~~ED: Candace-H0rsley,-City'~anager
Page 2
Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement with EBA Engineering in an Amount Not to Exceed $44,421.50 for
Continuing Soil and Groundwater Plume Definition at the Corporation Yard
September 4, 2002
Funds in the amount of $29,750 are available for this work and are identified in the Fiscal
Year 2002 / 2003 budget as shown in Attachment 5. To date, the City has expended
$1,342.88 of these funds for related work at the Corporation Yard. A budget amendment in
the amount of $16,015 from the General Fund reserve is therefore needed to fund the work
mandated by the NCRWQCB.
EBA has confirmed that it will complete the required report by December 31,2002. The City
has been pleased with EBA's performance on past work related to the subsurface
investigation. EBA has proven that it can complete required work products within established
deadlines.
CITY OF UKIAH
AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
DATED AUGUST 26, 1998
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
All terms and conditions of the Agreement for Professional Consulting Services dated
August 26, 1998; the Amendment dated December 15, 1998; the Second Amendment
dated May 5, 1999; the Third Amendment dated July 5, 2000; and the Fourth Amendment
dated August 23, 2001 shall remain in force and effect except as modified by this fifth
amendment.
AUTHORIZATION
Upon execution of this amendment, service provider is authorized to provide the service
described under the Scope of Additional Work identified in this Amendment No. 5.
SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL WORK
Work authorized by this amendment shall include that work described in the
August 15, 2002 letter from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and
described in the letter from EBA Engineering dated July 26, 2002. Copies of said letters
are included in this fifth amendment.
COMPENSATION
Compensation for the performance of the additional work shall be made on a time and
expense basis at Consultant's customary fees. Expenses shall not exceed a maximum
total cost of $44,421.50.
EBA ENGINEERING
CITY OF UKIAH
BY: BY:
PRINT NAME:
TITLE:
CANDACE HORSLEY
City Manager
DATE DATE
Amendment No. 5 to Agreement for
Professional Consulting Services
July 26, 2002
RECEIVED
JUL 2, 9 200
CITY OF UKIAH
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
Mr. Rick Seanor
Department of Public Works
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Ave.
Ukiah, CA 95482
COST ESTIMATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 - 2003
CITY OF UKIAIt CORPORATION YARD UST INVESTIGATION
1320 AIRPORT ROAD, UKIAH, CALIFORNIA
EB,4 Job No. 98-621
Dear Mr. Seanor:
EBA Engineering is pleased to present this cost estimate for ongoing site investigation activities
related to the former underground fuel storage tanks at the Ukiah Corporation Yard during the 2002 -
2003 fiscal year. The scope of work for the upcoming fiscal year will include the implementation of
the April 2002 Work Plan for Continuing Soil and Groundwater Plume Definition prepared for the
project site. The additional investigation will consist of the installation of three additional soil
borings and three additional groundwater monitoring wells. Soil boring and monitoring well
installations will define the lateral and vertical extent of groundwater contamination at the project
site. Prior to the initiation of field activities, all necessary soil boring permits, encroachment permits,
and access agreements will be obtained.
..
Following the implementation of the Work Plan, a report of findings will be prepared and submitted
on behalf of the City of Ukiah to the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. This cost
estimate also includes projected costs for development of the newly installed monitoring wells, an
additional year of quarterly monitoring events, laboratory analytical fees, and costs for disposal of
soil and groundwater generated throughout the investigation. '
Several assumptions were made during the preparation of this cost estimate. EBA personnel will
prepare all necessary permits and access agreements for the project site. It is assumed that all
permitting fees will be paid directly by the City of Ukiah. Laboratory analytical costs and field
supplies were projected with the assumption that two soil samples and one groundwater sample will
be collected from each soil boring during the subsurface investigation activities. Quarterly
monitoring events will be conducted on 10 on-site and proposed monitoring wells for the period of
one additional year. Lastly, this cost estimate assumes that the proposed monitoring wells will be
surveyed to mean sea level and tied into the existing monitoring well network by City of Ukiah
personnel. Monitoring well XYZ locational data and laboratory analytical data generated during this
investigation will be uploaded by EBA personnel to the S~te Department of Water Resources
GeoTracker database as required by Assembly Bill 2886.
825 Sonoma Avenue, Suite C Santa Rosa, Calil:ornia 95404 {707] 544-0784
Also in Southern California
lzo
EBA's estimated cost to provide environmental services at the Ukiah Corporation Yard for fiscal
year 2002 - 2003 is not to exceed $44,421.50. EBA appreciates the opportunity to be of service to
you. Please call (707) 544-0784 if you have any questions or concerns regarding this cost estimate.
Sincerely,
EBA ENG/NEERING
Erik Phenix
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure: Detailed Cost Estimate
L:~w~ust~621uldah~nt estimatesk:ostest2002 cover, doc
Winston H. Hickox
Secretary for
Environmental
Protection
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
North Coast Region
William R. Massey, Chairman
Internet Address: http://www, swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb I/
5550 Skylane Boulevard, Suite A, Santa Rosa, California 95403
Phone: 1 (877) 721-9203 (toll free) · Office: (707) 576-2220 · FAX: (707) 523-0135
August 15, 2002
Gray Davis
GopelTtor
Mr. Rick Seanor
City of Ukiah
Department of Public Works
300 Seminary Drive
Ukiah, CA 95482
Dear Mr. Seanor:
Subject:
File:
Comments on Work Plan for Continued Soil and Groungwater Plum Definition.
Ukiah City Corporation Yard, 1320 Airport Road, Ukiah, California
Case No. 1TMC201
The Work Plan for Continued Soil and Groundwater Plume Definition dated April 2002
prepared by EBA Wastechnologies and the files for the subject site have been reviewed by the
Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board) staff. Regional Water Board
staff concurs with the proposed scope of work presented in the work plan.
Please notify Regional Water Board staff at least five (5) business days prior to starting the
field portion of this work so that the drilling procedure may be observed. Please submit the
report of field findings for the proposed work by December 31, 2002.
If you have any questions, please call 'me at (707) 576-2671.
..
Sincerely,
Daniel L. Warner
Environmental Scientist
DLW:clh\UCCY-7 Worlcplan Comments
cc: Mr. Wayne Briley, Mendocino County Health Dept., 501 Low Gap Road, Room 1326,
Ukiah, CA 95482
Mr. Eriksen Phenix, EBA Wasteclmologies, 825 Sonoma Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95404
California Environmental Protection Agency
ORecycled Paper
AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
This Agreement, made and entered into this ~ day of_~~~:~:~__, 1998, by
and between CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter "City" and EBA
referred as
WASTECHNOLOGIES (EBA), a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
RECITALS
This Agreement is predicated on the following facts:
al
be
City requires consulting services related to the implementation of the approved and amended work
plan for soil and groundwater investigation at the City Corporation Yard.
Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, skills, and experience to provide these
services, and is willing to provide them according to the terms of this Agreement.
City and Consultant agree upon the Scope-of-Work and Work Schedule attached hereto as
Attachment "A", describing contract provisions for the project and setting forth the completion
dates for the various services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement.
1.0
1.1
2.0
2.1
2.2.
3.0
3.1
TERMS OF AGREEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Project is described in detail in the attached Scope-of-Work (Attachment "A").
SCOPE OF SERVICES
As set forth in Attachment "A".
AdditiQnal Serviee~. Additional services, if any, shall only proceed upon written agreement
between City and Consultant. The written Agreement shall be in the form of an Amendment to
this Agreement.
CONDUCT OF WORK
Time of Completion. Consultant shall commence performance of services as required by the
Scope-of-Work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete such services
in accordance with the time requirements set forth in the Work Schedule. Consultant shall
complete the work to. the City's reasonable satisfaction, even if contract disputes arise or
Consultant contends its is entitled to further compensation.
AG~ FOR PROFE~ONAL CON~JLT1NG ~ltViC~
PAGE I OF 7
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
5.0
5.1
5.2
6.0
6.1
COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
Basis for Compensation. For the performance of the professional services of this Agreement,
Consultant shall be compensated on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed
maximum dollar amount of $12,:500. Labor charges shall be based upon Consultant's standard
hourly billing rates for the various classifications of personnel in effect as of the date of this
contract which shall include all indirect costs and expenses of every kind or nature, except direct
expenses. The direct expenses and the fees to be charged for same shall be customary and
reasonable.
Changes. Any changes in compensation warranted by changes in the Scope-of-Work of this
Agreement, must be agreed upon in writing by both parties to the Agreement. "Changes to the
Scope-of-Work" means different activities than those described in Attachment "A" and not
additional time to complete those activities than the parties anticipate on the date they entered this
Agreement.
.Sub-contractor PilymenL The use of sub-consultants or other services to perform a portion of
the work of this Agreement shall be approved by City prior to commencement of work. The cost
of sub-consultants shall be included within the $12,:500 provided in Section 4.1.
Terms of Payment. Payment to Consultant for services rendered in accordance with this contract
shall be based upon submission of monthly invoices for the work satisfactorily performed prior
to the date of invoice less any amount already paid to consultant, which amounts shall be due and
payable upon 30 days after receipt by City. Invoices shall be accompanied by documentation
sufficient to enable City to determine progress made. '
ASSURANCES OF CONSULTANT
Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely responsible for its
acts or omissions. Consultant (including its agents, servants, and employees) is not City's agent,
employee, or representative for any purpose.
'Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibility is solely to City.
Consultant has no interest and will not acquire any direct or indirect interest that would conflict
with its performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall not in the performance of this
Agreement employ a person having such an interest.
INDEMNIFICATION
Insurance Liability. Without limiting Consultant's obligations arising under Paragraph 6.2
Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it procures and maintains for the
duration of this Agreement insurance against claima for injuries to persons or damages to
property, which may arise from or in connection with its performance under this Agreement.
AG~ FOR PROFI~SIONAL CONSULTING ~i~RVICI~
PAGE 2 OF 7
Bo
C.
Minimum Scope of Insurance-
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
le
Insurance Services Office ('I$O) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form
No. CG 00 01 11 85.
.
I$O Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 "any
auto" or Code 8, 9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025.
.
Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers Liability Insurance.
e
Professional Liability Insurance covering damages which may result from errors,
omissions, or acts of professional negligence by Consultant.
Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
.
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work performed under this
Agreement, or the aggregate limit shall be twice the prescribed per occurrence
limit.
,
Automobile Liability_: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
.Worker's Compen~ati0n md Employers Liability: Worker's compensation limits
as required by the Labor Code of the State of C~ifornia and Employers Liability
limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
,
Professional Liability_ Coverage,: $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence.
If the coverage is an aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must apply separately
to the work performed under this Agreement, or the aggregate limit shall be
twice the per occurrence limit.
Deductibles and Self-!~ured Retentio.n~
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City.
At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or
self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and
related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
AG~ FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTIN~ $~RVICI~
PAGE 3 OF 7
De
Other Insurance Provisi~n~
The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1. Gnr Lia iii dAut mo il Li ill vr
a. The City, it officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as additional insureds as respects; liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products and
completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or
used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, hired or borrowed by the
Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the
scope-of-protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees
or volunteers.
be
The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as
respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers.
Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
de
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits
of the insurer's liability.
W rk r' men ati n Em I r Li ilit v ra e
The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from Consultant's
performance of the work, pursuant to this Agreement.
Professiona~ Liability_ Coverage
If written on a claims-made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the effective date
of this Agreement. ;Fhe policy period' shall extend from .June I, 1998 to
.June 1, 1999.
4. All Covera_~e~
Each Insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
AGREEMENT FOR PROFI~IONAL CONSULTING
PAGE 4 OF 7
6.2
7.0
E. Acceptability_ of Insurer~
Fe
Except for professional liability insurance, insurance is to be placed with insurers with
a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and who are admitted insurers in the State of
California. Professional liability insurance may be underwritten by Lloyds of London.
_Verification of Coverage
--
G,
Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of Insurance and with original
Endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates and
Endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that
insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The Certificates and Endorsements are to be on
forms provided or approved by the City. Where by statute, the City's Workers'
Compensation - related forms cannot be used, equivalent forms approved by the
Insurance Commissioner are to be substituted. All Certificates and Endorsements are to
be received and approved by the City before Consultant begins the work of this
Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all
required insurance policies, at any time. If Consultant fails to provide the coverages
required herein, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or
all of them. In that event, the cost of insurance becomes part of the compensation due
the contractor after notice to Consultant that City has paid the premium.
Subcontractors
If Consultant uses subcontractors or sub-consultants, it shall cover them under its polices
or require them to separately comply with the insurance requirements set forth in this
Paragraph 6.1.
Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition thereto,'
Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City officers, agents and employees from
and against any and all claims, demands, liability, costs and expenses, including court costs and
counsel fees, arising out of the injury to or death of any person or loss of or physical damage to
any property resulting from any negligent or wrongful act or omission committed by Consultant
or it's officers, agents or employees while performing services under this Agreement.
Consultant's liability for professional negligence shall be limited to $1,000,000.
As to events which occur during Consultant's performance of this Agreement, City shall hold
Consultant harmless from and defend. Consultant against all claims, liability, damage, or loss
arising out of any injury or death of any person or ~lamage to or destruction of property
attributable to the negligent or willfully wrongful act or omission of City or its officers and
employees, where the injury, death or damage is caused by the sole and active negligence or
willful misconduct of City or City's employees.
CONTRAC'rr PROVISIONS
AG~ FOR PROFE~IONAL CON.VOLTING ~RVICI~
PA6'~ $ OF 7
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
Ownership of W0r.~. All documents furnished to Consultant by City and all reports and
supportive data prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are City's property and shall be
given to City at the completion of Consultant's services at no additional cost to City.
Deliverables are identified in the Scope-of-Work, Attachment ~A*.
Governing Law. Consultant shall comply with the laws and regulations of the United States, the
State of California, and all local governments having jurisdiction over this Agreement. The
interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by California law and any
action arising under or in connection with this Agreement must be filed in a Court of competent
jurisdiction in Mendocino County.
Entire A~eemenI. This Agreement plus its Attachment(s) and executed Amendments set forth
the entire understanding b~tween the parties.
~. If any term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect.
~. No modification of this Agreement is valid unless made with the agreement of
both parties in writing.
i,~..~,_.~..~. Consultant's services are considered unique and personal. Consultant shall not
assign, transfer, or sub-contract its interest or obligation under all or any portion of this
Agreement without City's prior written consent.
Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall be
a waiver of. any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant, term or condition
or a waiver of the covenant, term or condition itself.
~. In the event a suit or action is instituted to enforce any of the terms and conditions'
of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall collect, in addition to the costs and disbursements
alloWed by statutes, such sums as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees in such suit
or action in both trial and appellate courts.
~. This Agreement may only be terminated by either party: 1) for breach of the
Agreement; 2) because funds are no longer available to pay Consultant for services provided
under this Agreement; or 3) City has abandoned and does not wish to complete the project for
which Consultant was retained. A party shall notifij the other party of any alleged breach of the
Agreement and of the action required .to cure the breach.. If the non-breaching fails to cure the
breach within the time specified in the notice, the contract shall be terminated as of that time.
If terminated for lack of funds or abandonment of the project, the contract shall terminate on the
date notice of termination is given to Consultant. City shall pay the Consultant only for services
performed and expenses incurred as of the effective termination date. In such event, as a
condition to payment, Consultant shall provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant
under this Agreement. Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for
any work satisfactorily completed hereunder, subject to off-set for any direct or consequential
damages City may incur as a result of Consultant's breach of'contract.
AG~ FOR PROFI~S~NAL CON~'~JLTING ~t, VK~
PAGE 6 OF 7
'/.!0
{.0
Duplicate Ori_tinal~. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each bearing the
original signature of the parties. When so signed, ca'ch such document shall be admissible in
administrative or,judicial proceedings as proof' of the terms of the Agreement between the parties.
Any notice given under this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed given when personally
delivered or deposited in the mail (ramified or registered) addressed to the patties as follows:
CITY OF UKIAH EBA WASTECHNOLOGIES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 825 SONOMA AVENUE, SUITE C
300 SEMINARY AVENUE SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95404
UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 95482
9.0 SIGNATURES
written: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above
CITY OF UKIAH
CANDACE HORSLEY-
CITY MANAGER
EBA WASTECHNOLOGIES
BY:
ATTEST
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
·
DA
ATTACHMENTS
A. Scope-of-Work and Work Schedule
ATTACHNiT~T "A"
SCOPE-OF-SERVICES
AND
WORK SCHEr~ULE
A. Scope-of-Services
Consultant agrees to provide those services needed to complete, to the reasonable satisfaction
of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region, the work described in the
approved and amended Work Plan for soil and groundwater investigation at the City of Ukiah
Corporation Yard dated April 1998, including those items of work outlined in the letter from
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region, dated June 18, 1998,
attached hereto. In general terms, this work involves the installation and sampling of six (6)
borings, converting two (2) borings into 2" monitoring wells to a depth of 20 feet, development
of the two (2) new monitoring wells, sampling of the two (2) existing, two (2) monitoring wells,
and preparation of a Report of Findings with conclusions and recommendations for additional
work. Consultant has provided a Revised Cost Estimate Summary dated July 10, 1998, which
provides estimated costs for the various phases of work required by the approved and amended
Work Plan. The estimated cost of each item of work is provided for reference only and the
itemized costs are not cost maximums for the indicated work item. Consultant shall be
compensated in accordance with Paragraph 4.0 of the Agreement.
B. Work Schedule
The Consultant shall complete the work of the Agreement to facilitate a submittal of the Report
of Findings to the North Coast Regional Water Control Board no later than October 30, 1998.,
..
A: 1 ~.GREEM ENT.2
EBA
AGR.EIDAENT FOR PROFF...~IONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
PAGE 8 OF 7
O
ETTt~CI-t M EKI T
Z
0
Item No.
Date: September 4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF PURCHASE FROM THE KAMAN CO. FOR ONE
ELECTRONIC BEARING MONITOR IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,308.45
This report is to comply with Section 1522 of the City Code regarding notification to
the Council for acquisition of supplies costing more than $5,000, but less than $10,000.
The Wastewater Treatment plant has over 50 pumps and associated motors ranging
in size from ½ to 65 Horsepower. Some of these run 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
Preventive and predictive maintenance of the pump and motor bearings are crucial to
operation. A Bearing Monitor, through sophisticated electronics, senses vibrations or
pulses given off by the bearings, interprets the readings, and on simple scale tells the
operator the condition of the bearing. Good, Bad or showing signs of wear. This allows
Staff to plan ahead for maintenance and replace equipment prior to catastrophic failure.
Staff determined that the SPM Bearing Monitor was most appropriate for the
treatment plant operation. Through the informal bidding process, in conjunction with the
Purchasing Department, bids were received from three vendors: $6,623.76 from SPM,
$6,623.76 from Torrington Co., and $6,308.45 from Kaman Co. There are no suppliers of
this product located in Mendocino County. The monitor was purchased from Kaman Co.,
the Iow bidder
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file notification.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizen Advised:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Jerry Gall, Wastewater Treatment Supervisor
Darryl L. Barnes, Director of Public Utilities and Candace Horsley,
City Manager
None
APPROVE D: (_.~,~~¢--.~~~..._~_ _
Candace Horsloy, City~anager
AGENDA
SUMMARY
ITEM NO. 6o
DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2002
REPORT
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT AND REPORT TO COUNCIL
REGARDING PURCHASE OF PLATFORM DUMP BODY FROM RIVER CITY
TRUCK AND EQUIPMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,032.81
The Parks Department is in need of a dump truck to improve its operational efficiency,
and in this year's budget $25,000 is authorized to be set aside for the future purchase of such
a vehicle (attachment #2). The Street Maintenance Department is currently surplusing a used
truck which is suitable for Parks, yet the cab and chassis it secured last year requires a new
platform dump body to complete this replacement. However, the purchase of a platform body
by Street Maintenance, was not specifically identified in the current budget. Even though
adequate funds are available in the equipment replacement fund for both departments, an
amendment to the budget authorizing the expenditures is necessary. This project will result in
meeting the needs of both departments and result in substantial cost savings to the City.
The Street Maintenance Department, in conjunction with the Purchasing Department,
has completed an informal bid process to purchase a platform body. Requests For Quotations
(RFQs) were sent to seven vendors and two bids were received. There are no vendors for this
product in the Ukiah valley. River City Truck and Equipment, Sacramento, was the Iow bidder
at a cost of $6,032.81.
If the budget amendment is approved, the purchase will be consummated. This report
will serve as compliance with Section 1522 of the City Code regarding notification to the
Council for acquisition of supplies costing more than $5,000, but less than $10,000.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Approve amendment to the 2002/2003 budget authorizing: a) expenditure of $6,033 in
account 698.3110.800.000 to purchase platform dump truck body by Street Maintenance
Department, and b) expenditure of $6,033 in account 698.6001.800.000 and revenue of
$6,033 in account 698.0900.905.311 to reflect Parks purchase of and payment to Street
Maintenance for surplus dump truck;
2. Receive report regarding acquisition of platform dump body from River City Truck And
Equipment in the amount of $6,032.81.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS:
Determine budget amendment is not appropriate, take no action to approve, and
provide direction to Staff regarding alternative purchase option.
Citizen Advised: N/A
Requested by: Street Maintenance and Parks Departments · "~ f"~ t
Prepared by: Michael F. Harris, Risk ManagedBudget Officer ~ i.-~~
Coordinated with: Larry DeKnoblough, Community Services Director, Jim' Looney, Public
Works Superintendent, and Candace Horsley, City Manager
Attachments: 1. Budget amendment worksheet, page 1;
2. Excerpt from adopted Parks budget, page 2.
APPROVED:(~~..
Candace Horsley, City~lanager
mfh:asrcc02
0904Platform
Eooo
g · .1~
0
I-
Z
U.I
ITEM NO. 8(a)
DATE: September 4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT:
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE DANCO BUILDERS / SHAPIRO
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING PROJECT
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission recently approved the Danco Builders 64-unit affordable
housing project west of the railroad tracks south of Gobbi Street. The project design included the
development of an access road from Gobbi Street rather than using Porzio Lane. To facilitate the
design and construction of this new road, the applicants and an adjoining property owner have
applied for a Boundary Line Adjustment, General Plan Amendment, and Rezoning. The General
Plan Amendment and Rezoning are necessary to designate and zone the land for the road to be
consistent with the designation and zoning of the parcel to be developed with apartments.
Subsequent to the Boundary Line Adjustment, the new access road and apartments will be situated
on the same parcel.
The General Plan Amendment and Rezoning were publicly noticed for consideration by the City
Council at its September 4, 2002 meeting. However, this scheduling was premature, because the
Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) must be approved and finalized before the properties can be
redesignated and rezoned. Accordingly, Staff, with the concurrence of the applicants is requesting
that this item be continued to allow the BLA process to be completed. Once the BLA process is
finalized, Staff will renotice the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for a public hearing and
action by the City Council.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Continue the Danco Builders / Shapiro General Plan Amendment and
Rezoning proposal, and direct Staff to renotice the project when a meeting date is selected.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY ACTION: Do not continue the project, and provide direction to
Staff.
Citizen Advised: Publicly noticed according to the requirements of the Ukiah Municipal Code
Requested by: Danco Builders - Dan Johnson, and Mike Shapiro, Property Owner
Prepared by: Charley Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development
Coordinated with: Candace Horsley, City Manager
Attachments: None
APPROVED: ~.~'~
Candace Horsley, City Manger
AGENDA
ITEM NO:
MEETING DATE:
9a
September 4, 2002
SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: PRESENTATION REGARDING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
The City is aware of the growing concern within our community regarding increased
vehicle traffic and the related safety issues. While the majority of complaints received are
speed related, various other minor traffic violations also seem to be increasing. These
include unsafe lane changes, failure to signal, u-turns in restricted areas and bicycle and
pedestrian violations. If this pattern of behavior by some drivers, bicyclists and
pedestrians continues unchecked, we believe the City will experience an increase of motor
vehicle accidents and injuries. In response, the City IVlanager requested the Police and
Public Works Departments to develop a strategy to improve our pedestrian safety through
enforcement, education, and enhanced road features.
Police
In response to this concern, the Police Department initiated a traffic enforcement program
that should have a positive impact on traffic safety within the city. Since the City does
not have additional officers available to be specifically assigned to full time traffic
enforcement, this program is dependent upon patrol officers and the Community Response
Team (CRT) having available time to focus on violations.
(Continued on page 2)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive presentation.
ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizens Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
N/A
Candace Horsley, City Manager
John Williams, Police Chief
Diana Steele, Director of Public Works and City Engineer
1, Photos of crosswalk markings
Candace Horsley, C~'ty'~nager
CAN/ASR. Crosswalks. 090402
The program consists of data collection, public education and enforcement. The CRT has
been assigned the task of collecting data and overseeing the program. When a particular
area or concern has been identified either by the public or by officers, this information is
relayed to CRT who maintains a list of problem areas. A notification is made to the Ukiah
Daily ,1ournal regarding the area where enforcement will be taken against traffic violators.
The radar trailer is placed in the area for a period of time. After its removal patrol officers
begin enforcement action. While it is not necessary to notify the UD.1 or place the radar
trailer, our intent is to educate the motoring public and solicit their voluntary compliance.
This process will not prevent officers from taking other enforcement action when
witnessing violations or in other well-known high traffic areas.
~[f the identified traffic problem is other than speed, CRT will notify patrol officers of the
specific concern and officers will focus enforcement action at that location. Bicycle and
pedestrian violations are included in this program. The CRT is attempting to re-instate the
bicycle safety classes for juvenile bicycle offenders. Once started, juveniles who are cited
for violating bicycle traffic laws have an opportunity to attend a safety class sponsored by
Ukiah Police. After attending the class the citation is dismissed. Adult violations are
handled in the same manner as vehicle citations and are referred to court.
CRT will continue to plan and implement crosswalk and other pedestrian enforcement
operations. This has been a successful deterrent in the past. We hope to expand the
program by including educational announcements through local news media outlets and
presentations at local schools. Our goal is to not only educate motorists regarding
pedestrian safety but also the pedestrians. With proper technique and awareness even
the busiest streets can be traversed safely.
Although short-term success of this program will be difficult to judge, statistical data
should provide some idea of its value. Whenever the Department is faced with a
shortage of personnel due to vacancies, sickness, training, and vacations, etc. it will be
difficult to maintain consistency, increasing numbers of calls for service impact the time
available for officers to spend in traffic enforcement. This being said, we recognize the
worsening traffic problem as a priority and will continue to seek reasonable solutions to
minimize the negative impact.
Public Works
The Public Works Department has an ongoing program of maintaining the markings which
establish crosswalks throughout the City. At some heavily traveled locations painted
crosswalk markings are being replaced with thermoplastic because it is more durable.
At several locations, identified by staff or by citizens, white or yellow "high visibility"
crosswalks have been installed. These crosswalks are different in that a cross-hatched
pattern covers approximately 1/2 of the walking surface creating increased contrast from
the pavement.
Locations considered for high visibility crosswalks include crossings of arterial streets and
high volume collectors with three or more lanes and speeds of 30 mph and greater, at
higher volume pedestrian crossings, at crossings for schools and other similar facilities,
and at mid-block and non-signalized crossings of high volume streets.
White high-visibility crosswalks are located at:
· East Perkins Street at Mason Street
· East Perkins Street at Leslie Street
· East Perkins Street at Warren Drive
· South State Street at Freitas Avenue
· East Gobbi Street at Leslie Street
· South Dora Street mid-block between Observatory and Washington Avenues near
Ukiah Medical Center
There are also yellow high-visibility mid-block school crossings serving:
· Oak Manor School at Orchard Avenue and Gibson Creek
· Oak Manor School at Oak Manor Drive
· Ukiah High School at Low Gap Road near the cemetery at County General Services
· Nokomis School on Washington Avenue
· Yokayo School at 247 Gardens Avenue
· Senior Center on Leslie Street
The City continues to require the installation and/or repair of sidewalks as conditions of
development when appropriate and has recently implemented its revised Homeowners
Sidewalk Construction Reimbursement program. The City has an ongoing program to
construct ADA accessible ramps along critical routes and actively pursues S'I'~P funding for
these. A continuous and unobstructed sidewalk system contributes to pedestrian safety.
High Visibility Crosswalk on Perkins Street at Warren Drive
City Street Crews routinely enhance crosswalk markings.
AGENDA
1TEM NO: 9b
MEETING DATE: September 4, 2002
SUMMARY REPORT
SUB3ECT: APPROVAL OF ESTABLISHMENT AND PARTIC]:PATION IN THE
RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION
The City was originally contacted by the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) regarding
the organization and formation of a Russian River Watershed Association. The cities and
water districts of the Bay Area formed a North Bay Watershed Association (NBWA) several
years ago, which was created to help local and regional public agencies work cooperatively
on water resources issues that impacted areas beyond traditional boundaries, and to
promote stewardship of the North Bay Watershed. Agencies participated in the NBWA to
discuss issues of common interest, explore ways to work cooperatively on water resources
projects of regional concern, and share information about projects, regulations, and
technical issues. There are 15 member agencies within the NBWA, and it has proven to
be a very successful conduit for water quality, habitat and flood protection, and resource
management.
(Continued on page 2)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discuss and provide direction to staff.
ALTERNATI'VE COUNCIL POLICY OPTIONS: N/A
Citizens Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
N/A
Candace Horsley, City Manager
N/A
1. Russian River Watershed Association:
Executive Summary
Draft Memorandum of Understanding
Supplemental Notes
Approved' '.~~L~~~
Candace Horsley, City)~anager
4:CAN/ASR. RRWatershedAssoc.090402
The goals of the Russian River Watershed Association would be: First, bring together
cities and local agencies to work cooperatively and effectively on issues of common
interest. Second, be proactive on watershed-based regulation, which increasingly affects
areas beyond traditional political boundaries. Third, work cooperatively to increase
eligibility for watershed based funding. Fourth, maximize effective use of resources. Fifth,
enhance the Association's influence on local, state, and federal policies and programs.
And sixth, educate communities about the importance of watershed stewardship.
On August 15, 2002, various Sonoma and Mendocino County city and county
representatives met to discuss the draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding
this Association. Each party of the MOU would be a local government entity functioning
within the watershed of the Russian River. County membership will represent individual
water districts. A draft Memorandum of Understanding creating the Russian River
Watershed Association is attached for your review and comment. Several changes were
made by the committee and are in the underlined, strikeout version that is attached. Also
included is a supplemental note section from the meeting, which describes the types of
members, the Board of Directors, the officers and the annual budget and work plan for the
Association.
Costs associated with being a Board member or an agency member would include a
$5,000 start-up implementation fee. The annual budget beyond the first year would
consist of overhead and programs of general benefit to all member agencies that would be
paid for by dividing half of the costs equally among member agencies and the other half
allocated in proportion to each member agency's operating budget. Programs that are of
specific benefit to one or more member agencies would be paid for by the benefiting
agencies in proportion to the benefit they receive. Annual dues in excess of these
proportion costs may be assessed upon approval by the Board.
Representatives from the County of Mendocino and the City of Ukiah were in attendance
at the initial committee meeting. At my request, the !nland Water and Power Commission
(!WPC) has also been included on the list as a potential Board member, to give three
votes to the Mendocino County area. ! have given all of the materials regarding the
Association to the !WPC and they will be discussing this item at their September meeting.
Staff is requesting Council's review of the enclosed materials and discussion of whether
the City of Ukiah will be a participating public agency of this Association. Staff feels that
there are many benefits to being a participating, voting member of this watershed
partnership, which would assist the City in the many areas of water projects and concern
that we will have in the very near future.
Public Agency Association for the Russian River Watershed
July 11, 2002
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Sonoma County Water Agency is'asking cities, towns and special districts in the
Russian River watershed to consider participating in development of an association of
regulated public agencies with jurisdiction in the Russian River watershed. The
proposed association is needed to address a trend in state and federal agencies toward
a watershed approach to regulatory requirements. Participation in the association
would provide local government agencies an opportunity to work cooperatively with
other agencies in the Russian River watershed on issues of common interest such as
Total Maximum Daily Load regulations (TMDLs), Endangered Species Act compliance
(ESA), habitat restoration, water reuse, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permits and studies, pollution prevention, source water protection, public
education and other required activities. The association would allow local governments
to:
· Work cooperatively and effectively with other agencies on watershed
based regulations and issues.
· Explore coordinated efforts on projects in order to leverage limited
funding and resources; decreasing costs and increasing the impact
of projects.
· Maximize success in securing state and federal grant funding for new
watershed programs.
· Efficiently share information about projects, regulations, and
technical issues.
The association of public agencies in the Russian River watershed would supplement
existing local government programs, allow local governments to respond to regulatory
requirements collectively at reduced cost, increase eligibility for grant funding and
provide a stronger voice to speak for regional priorities with federal and state agencies
and legislative bodies.
In order to form this association and develop and proceed with programs to be
addressed by the association, mayors, council members and city managers are asked
to consider the following actions: 1 ) Schedule an appointment to discuss formation of
this association with your board or council as an informational item, 2) Invite a staff
member and council member to be key contacts for developing the association and
authorize these individuals to start meeting regularly to discuss formation of the
association, 3) Review the draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the
association, obtain legal review if necessary, and provide input on any proposed
revisions to the document, and, 4) Take steps to secure approval from your Council or
Board to sign the MOU, become members of the association and appoint your board
member and alternate board member to the association board of directors.
The Watershed Approach
Regulatory agencies that set requirements for local governments are increasingly
focusing on managing watersheds, which are generally defined as the area draining to
individual surface water bodies such as rivers, creeks and lakes. The U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established guidance for National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting based on a watershed approach. In
addition, the anticipated reauthorization of the Clean Water Act (CWA) may require use
of a watershed approach. The State of California's Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) have
developed a Watershed Management Initiative (WMI) to achieve the goal of
geographically targeted permitting.
Water resource management decisions are best made on a watershed basis that takes
into consideration a variety of environmental, political, institutional, social, technical,
economic, and public positions related to proposed regulatory actions, as well as the
related needs for water and land resource uses in watersheds. Focusing management
decisions on an entire watershed balances efforts to control pollution and protect
drinking water sources and sensitive natural resources. A watershed focus also helps
identify cost-effective pollution control strategies to meet clean water goals.
Benefits of Participating in the Watershed Process
Responding to and complying with watershed-based regulations can be done more
effectively and more efficiently under an organizational structure that spans the
watershed. Though no one local governmental body has jurisdiction over the entire
Russian River watershed, an association of governmental organizations in the
watershed could 1) improve communication between member agencies and regulatory
entities, 2) reduce the time and expense required to comply with regulations through
cost sharing, and, 3) provide a united effort in addressing watershed issues with
regulatory agencies and legislative bodies.
Local government agencies would benefit financially from participation in the
association by sharing the cost incurred to comply with regulations, and avoiding or
reducing the duplicative overhead cost of developing and implementing separate
programs in each city, town or agency. Cost savings could include reduced expenses
for baseline studies and the ability to reduce staff and consultant costs by drawing on
the expertise of staff from participating agencies.
An additional benefit would accrue from the increased eligibility for watershed-based
funding that may be available to the association. Individual cities and agencies will find
it increasingly difficult to compete for grant funding without a regional framework that
supports grant applications based on watershed priorities. Both state and federal
funding sources favor watershed based groups and projects when making funding
decisions. Potential sources of funding include the Clean Water Action Plan, the
California Coastal Salmon Recovery Program, Water Resources Development Act
Section 503, Clean Water Act programs, Safe Drinking Water Act programs, and funds
made available by statewide water and parks bond initiatives. Many of these programs
provide a portion of the total project cost and require local agencies to generate
additional funding from operating budgets or other sources. Association members can
pool resources to provide these required matching funds for grant applications.
Issues Affectinq Local Governments Within the Watershed
Activities of local government agencies, regardless the charge of the agency, are
regulated under many of the same regulations and statutes (see Table 1). A few
examples of issues within the Russian River watershed that affect agencies
participating in the proposed association include:
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs): The RWQCB designates beneficial uses for
the protection of surface and ground water quality based on historic water use.
Beneficial uses of water resources include drinking and irrigation water supplies,
habitat, recreation, transportation, and aesthetics. Water bodies with pollutant levels
high enough to negatively impact a beneficial use are designated as "impaired water
bodies" with respect to those particular pollutants. Section 303(d) of the CWA requires
California to develop a list of impaired surface water bodies throughout the state and to
submit the list to EPA for approval. It further requires that TMDLs be developed for
each of these water bodies to control and limit the discharge of the listed pollutant.
Placement of a water body on the 303(d) list acts as the trigger for developing a
pollution control plan, called a TMDL.
The Russian River was listed as impaired under section 303(d) for sediment in 1998.
Currently proposed 303(d)listings for streams in the Russian River watershed include
pathogens, temperature, nutrients and dissolved oxygen.
NPDES Permit Issues: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits are
required for storm water discharge under EPA rules. New Phase II permit requirements
expand the requirements of the current program to smaller communities than did the
Phase I program. Operators of Phase II regulated facilities are required to apply for
NPDES permit coverage by March 10, 2003 and are required to implement storm water
pollution prevention plans (SWPPPs) or storm water management programs (both using
best management practices (BMPs)) that effectively reduce or prevent the discharge of
pollutants into receiving waters.
Endangered Species Act Compliance: Three salmonid species found in the Russian
River and tributaries are listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species
Act. State and federal agencies are currently working with local agencies to develop a
recovery plan for these species and a federal-local consultation under Section 7 of the
ESA is also in progress. The agencies expect to complete a biological assessment in
the spring of 2003 to be followed by a biological opinion which is expected to be issued
by the National Marine Fisheries Service in September of 2003. The federal biological
opinion and the requirements of the species recovery plans may require important
changes in utility and storm water operations and other activities of local cities and
agencies.
Water Reuse: The disposal and use of treated wastewater is an issue that affedts
nearly all communities within the Russian River watershed. Wastewater treatment
facilities are restricted by seasonal discharge requirements and by restrictions on the
allowable uses for recycled water. At the same time, tightening standards under the
California Toxics Rule and other regulatory programs are making it increasingly
desirable for sanitation agencies to eliminate surface water discharges. Progress in
water reuse is to some extent dependent on the ability of public agencies to develop
cooperative programs to link sources of recycled water with cost effective projects that
use recycled water to offset potable use or reduce extraction of water from natural
streams or limited groundwater basins.
The North Bay Watershed Association as an Example
The North Bay Watershed Association (NBWA) was organized in July of 2000 for
purposes similar to those described for the proposed Russian River association. Fifteen
public agencies are currently members of NBWA including the City of Petaluma, the
City of Sonoma, the County of Sonoma and the Sonoma County Water Agency along
with other agencies and local governments in Marin and Napa counties. The NBWA
Board of Directors meets monthly and manages a fiscal year 2001-02 budget of about
$339,000 with about $268,000 devoted to specific projects including regional water
recycling, mercury source identification and control plans, coordination of non-point
source NPDES efforts, stream erosion prevention and sediment control demonstration
projects and other specific benefit projects. Overhead costs for fiscal year 2001-02
were 12.5%.
Costs for NBWA projects that benefit all members are allocated to member agencies
such that one half of the cost is divided equally among member agencies and one half
is allocated to member agencies in proportion to the member agency's annual operating
budget. Costs for special benefit projects are allocated to member agencies in
proportion to the benefit received by each agency as determined by the NBWA Board of
Directors. NBWA has set fixed dues for the first year of participation and for new
members who join part way through a fiscal year at $5,000.
Next Steps
Staff are asking those considering participation in the proposed association of public
agencies in the Russian River watershed to take the following actions:
1. Schedule an appointment to discuss formation of this association with your board or
council as an ~nformational item.
2. Invite a staff member and council member to be key contacts for developing the
association. Authorize these individuals to start meeting regularly to discuss formation
of the association.
3. Review the draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the association, obtain
legal review if necessary, and give us your input on any proposed revisions to the
document.
4. Take steps to secure approval from your Council or Board to sign the MOU, become
members of the association and appoint your board member and alternate board
member to the association board of directors.
DRAFT
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CREATING
THE ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AGENCIES IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made and entered into by and
between the parties that are signatories to this MOU, listed in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated by reference.
Section A. Recitals:
1. Each of the parties to this MOU is a local government entity functioning
within the watershed of the Russian River.
2. The parties desire to establish a watershed association in order to facilitate
partnerships across political boundaries that promote the ecological vitality of the
Russian River watershed.
3. It is to the parties' mutual advantage and benefit to develop and implement
cooperative restoration and protection efforts throughout the watershed and promote a
regional alliance that supplements local government programs.
4. The parties hereto plan to develop joint proposals for funding and to obtain
public support for local, state, federal, and other funding opportunities for programs that
implement the mission and goals of the Association.
5. The parties hereto recognize the value of using common resources
effectively.
6. The parties hereto desire to be proactive on watershed-based regulatory
issues which affect areas beyond traditional political boundaries.
7. The parties hereto desire to educate the communities in the Russian River
watershed about the importance of watershed stewardship.
8. The parties hereto wish to coordinate on local, state and federal policies and
programs.
9. The parties hereto find that promoting the stewardship of the Russian River
watershed resources is in the public interest and for the common benefit of all within the
Russian River watershed.
10. The parties recognize that there are current and future regulatory
requirements which apply to water resources in the Russian River watershed affecting
one or more of said parties, and that these multiple regulatory requirements may be
conflicting whenever one party's response to a regulatory requirement affects other
requirements and/or parties. The parties agree to share information and coordinate
efforts to comply with said regulatory requirements.
Association of Russian River Public Agencies- Revised
I 08/15/02
DRAFT
Section B.
General Provisions.
1. Definitions. As used in this MOU, the following words and phrases shall
have the meanings set forth below unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(a) "MOU" shall mean this memorandum of understanding establishing the
Association of Public Agencies in the Russian River Watershed.
(b) "Association" shall mean the Association of Public Agencies in the
Russian River Watershed.
(c) "Board of Directors" shall mean the governing board established
pursuant to this MOU.
(d) "Member" or "Members" shall mean the local and/or regional public
agencies regulated under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., the federal
Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq., and/or the state Safe Drinking Water
Act, Health & Safety Code § 116275 et seq., that operate within or have jurisdiction over
any area within the boundaries of the Association, and that are signatories to this MOU.
(e) '~/Vatershed" shall mean the entire Russian River watershed. A map
depicting the boundaries of the Association is attached hereto and incorporated herein
as Exhibit B.
2. Purpose. This MOU is being entered into in order to establish the
Association of,Public Agencies in the Russian River Watershed to carry out the mission,
goals and objectives stated herein and as stated in the mission and goals attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C.
3. Establishment of the Association. There is hereby established the
Association of Public Agencies in the Russian River Watershed ("Association").
Al,h,.,, ,,-,h ,.hC ;,.,;,;~ f,..,,.., ,o ,.,f ,h,-, ~ o~-,-,,-.;~,;,-,,., ,,;m h,~ O"' thc °'"' ,,h.-.,-,., ,-, ,-, m l ,-, ,-, ,.,f thC.
................ m_.l :,,~ geographic boundaries of the Association shall be the entire
Russian River watershed (see Exhibit B).
4. Association Membership. The Association shall have three categories of
members, as follows:
(a) Member. Any local and/or regional public agency regulated under the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, 42
U.S.C. § 300f et seq., and/or the state Safe Drinking Water Act, Health & Safety Code §
116275 et seq., that operates within or has jurisdiction over any area within the
boundaries of the Association may be a Member of the Association. Each Member
must be a signatory to this MOU, and shall be entitled to one vote.
(b) Associate Member. Any association, stakeholder, organization, private
group, or public agency supportive of the purposes of this Association may be an
Associate Member of the Association to serve in an advisory capacity to the
Association. The Board of Directors shall set the conditions and privileges of
membership for Associate Members, and these conditions and privileges shall not be
inconsistent with the terms of this MOU. Associate Members are not entitled to vote,
and their membership is at the will of the Board of Directors.
(c) Ex Officio Member. State and federal agencies with regulatory
authority over or an interest in the Watershed may participate as ex officio members of
Association of Russian River Public Agencies - Revised 2 08/15/02
DRAFT
the Association to serve in an advisory capacity to the Association. The Board of
Directors shall set the conditions and privileges of ex officio membership for state and
federal agencies. Ex officio members are not entitled to vote, and their membership is
at the will of the Board of Directors.
5. Membership of the Board of Directors.
(a) The governing body of the Association shall be a Board of Directors
consisting of a representative from each Member agency. The governing board of each
of the Member agencies shall appoint one representative and one alternate
representative.
(b) If the total number of Member agencies exceeds seventeen (17)
M, ember agencies, the Members may vote to create an Executive Board of Directors
with duties to be specified when the Executive Board of Directors is formed.smaller tha~.
!7 members. The Members may decide the composition, terms of office, method of
appointment and number of representatives on the Executive Board of Directors, but the
Executive Board of Directors shall consist of at least five (5) members. The Members
will strive to reflect on the Executive Board of Directors the variety and diversity of
Member agencies. The vote to create an Executive Board of Directors must be by a
four-fifths majority a una"imous vote of all Members of the Association. If the Members
decide to establish an Executive Board of Directors under this Section, each Member
which is not represented on the Board of Directors shall continue to appoint one
representative and one alternate to be that Member's representative to the Association
and to cast votes on behalf of the Member agency when a vote of the membership is
required. All references herein to "Board of Directors" shall include the Executive Board
of Directors.
6. Voting Requirements.
(a) Each member of the Board of Directors of the Association shall have
one vote.. With the exception of the items set forth in subsections (b) and (c) below and
as otherwise specified herein, if a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the majority
of members of the Board of Directors present is required to approve any item. In
addition to conducting the regular business of the Association and to any authority
outlined in the Association's bylaws, the Board of Directors may award, modify or accept
work under any contract in an amount not to exceed $10,000 by majority vote.
(b) A two-thirds majority vote of all Member agencies shall be required to
adopt or modify the budget, award, modify or accept work under any contract in excess
of $10,000, grant any licenses or permits, accept any interest in land, and adopt or
modify the by-laws of the Association.
(c) A maiority unanimousvote of the governing bodiesy of four-fifths ofeaeh
the Member agenciesy shall be required to modify this MOU.
7. Quorum. A majority of the members of the Board of Directors shall
constitute a quorum for purposes of transacting business, except less than a quorum
may vote to adjourn a meeting.
8. Terms of Office. Each member of the Board of Directors shall serve at the
pleasure of his or her appointing body and may be removed as a member of the Board
of Directors by the appointing body at any time. If at any time a vacancy occurs on the
Association of Russian River Public Agencies - Revised
3 08/15/02
DRAFT
Board of Directors, a replacement shall be appointed by the Member agency to fill the
unexpired term of the previous representative within ninety (90) days of the date that
such position becomes vacant.
9. Alternates. Alternate representatives to the Association shall be
empowered to cast votes in the absence of the regular member or, in the event of a
conflict of interest preventing the regular member from voting, to vote because of such a
conflict of interest.
10. Officers of the Association. The Board of Directors of the Association shall
elect a Chair, a Vice-Chair and such other officers from the Board of Directors, as the
Board of Directors deems appropriate. In electing a Chair and Vice-Chair, the Board of
Directors shall encourage the election of individuals who are elected officials of the
Member agencies. Such officers shall serve for a term of one (1) year unless sooner
terminated at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The duties of the Chair and Vice-
Chair are as follows:
(a) Chair. The Chair shall represent the Board of Directors and, subject to
the approval of the Board of Directors, oversee and carry out the affairs of the
Association and the activities of the officers of the Board of Directors, the staff, and
consultants. The Chair shall perform all duties incident to the office and such other
duties as may be required to carry out this MOU or which may be prescribed from time
to time by the Board of Directors.
(b) Vice-Chair. The Vice-Chair shall serve as the Chair in the absence of
the regularly-elected Chair. In the event both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent from
a meeting which would otherwise constitute a quorum and a temporary Chair was not.
designated by the Chair at the last regular meeting, any Board member may call the
meeting to order, and a temporary chair may be elected by majority vote to serve until
the Chair or Vice-Chair is present..
..
11. Treasurer and Controller. The controller and the Treasurer of the
Association shall be the financial officer or functional equivalent of one of the Member
agencies, with the consent of the Member Agency, and shall be designated Treasurer
and controller of the Association by a two-thirds majority vote of the Association. The
Treasurer of the Association shall be the depositor and shall have custody of all money
of the Association from whatever source. The controller of the Association shall draw
warrants to pay demands against the Association when the demands have been
approved by the Association or by its authorized representative pursuant to any
delegation of authority authorized by the Association. The controller shall cause an
independent annual audit of the Association's finances to be made by a certified public
accountant.
The governing body of the same Member agency as the Treasurer and controller
may determine charges to be made against the Association for the services of the
Treasurer and controller. Payment of these charges shall be subject to the approval of
the Board of Directors.
12. Clerk and Legal Counsel. The Board of Directors of the Association may
appoint a clerk and legal counsel, as it deems appropriate. The clerk and/or legal
counsel may be appointed from the staff of one of the Member agencies, with the
Association of Russian River Public Agencies- Revised
4 08/15/02
DRAFT
consent of the Member agency. If the clerk and/or legal counsel is appointed from the
staff of one of the Member agencies, the governing body of that Member agency may
determine charges to be made against the Association for the services of the clerk
and/or legal counsel. Payment of these charges shall be subject to the approval of the
Board of Directors.
13. Executive Director. The Board of Directors of the Association may appoint
an Executive Director who shall be responsible to the Board of Directors for the proper
and efficient administration of the Association as directed by the Board of Directors
pursuant to the provisions of this MOU or of any resolution or order of the Board of
Directors. The Executive Director may be appointed from the staff of one of the
Member agencies, with the consent of the Member agency. If the Executive Director is
appointed from the staff of one of the Member agencies, the governing body of that
Member agency may determine charges to be made against the Association for the
services of the Executive Director. Payment of these charges shall be subject to the
approval of the Board of Directors.
The Executive Director serves at the will of the Board of Directors, and must give
at least thirty (30) day's notice if he or she chooses to resign from the position.
In addition to any other duties that may be assigned, the Executive Director shall
have the following authority:
(a) to carry out action and direction from the Board of Directors as necessary;
(b) under the policy direction of the Board of Directors, to plan, organize and
supervise Association activities;
(c) to authorize expenditures within the designations and limitations of the
budget approved by the Association; and
(d) to make recommendations to and requests of the Board of Directors
concerning any matter which is to be performed, done or carried out by the Board of '
Directors.
14. Staff and Consultants. Through a Member agency, the Association may
employ or contract for any staff, including Executive Director, or consultants as may be
reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this MOU. If an employee from any
Member agency performs staff or consulting work for the Association, the governing
body of that Member Agency may determine charges to be made against the
Association for the services of that employee. Payment of these charges shall be
subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.
15. Annual Work Plan. Within ninety days after the first meeting of the Board of
Directors, and each year by January 1, the Association shall prepare an annual work
plan describing the work to be done by the Association in the ensuing fiScal year. The
work plan shall segregate all work of the Association into two categories: overhead and
programs. Work falling into the category of programs will be further segregated into
sub-categories: programs of general benefit to all Member agencies and programs of
specific benefit to one or more Member agencies. For each program, the work plan will
set forth information including the following:
(a) the purpose of the program;
(b) the method by which the program will be carried out;
(c) the products to be produced by the program;
Association of Russian River Public Agencies- Revised
5 08/15/02
DRAFT
(d) the schedule for carrying out the program;
(e) the responsibility for carrying out the program; and
(f) the budget for the program.
The work plan will be prepared in three parts. Part A shall consist of the
information on overhead. Part B shall consist of the information on programs of general
benefit to all Member agencies. Part C shall contain the information on the programs of
specific benefit to one or more Member agencies.
16. Annual Budget. Within ninety days after the first meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Association, and thereafter prior to the commencement of each fiscal
year (defined as July 1 through June 30), the Board of Directors shall adopt a budget for
consideration and approval by the Association for the ensuing fiscal year. The budget
shall include, but not be limited to, the following parts, with funding sources identified:
Part A of the budget shall set forth the cost of overhead and the allocation of
overhead cost among Member agencies;
Part B of the budget shall set forth the cost of programs of general benefit and the
allocation of costs of such programs among Member agencies;
Part C of the budget shall set forth the cost of programs of specific benefit to one
or more agencies and the allocation of costs among participating agencies.
17. Allocation of Costs.
(a) Costs for work described in Parts A and B of the annual work plan shall
be allocated equally among each of the Member agencies as follows:
(i) One half of these costs shall be allocated equally among each of
the Member agencies;
(ii) One half of these costs shall be allocated among Member
agencies in proportion to each agency's annual operating budget as defined by the
Board of Directors.
(iii) the allocation of costs to Associate Members for work described in
Parts A and B of the annual work plan shall be determined by the Board of Directors on
a case-by-case basis.
(b) Costs for work described in Part C of the annual work plan shall be
allocated among those agencies participating in the programs in direct proportion to the
benefits received by each agency in a manner established by the Board of Directors at
the time each program of specific benefit is approved or revised.
18. Dues and Allocated Costs. The Board of Directors shall have the authority
to assess initial dues for members and annual dues for associate and ex officio
members --~,-~, ~--,~,--~o~,;,- ,-~,--,,,--,, not to exceed $ 5 000. The Board of
Directors shall also have the authority to assess each Member and Associate Member
for costs set out in the annual budget, adopted pursuant to Section 16, and consistent
with the allocation of costs, adopted pursuant to Section 17. Members who join part
way through a Fiscal year will be assessed dues, not to exceed $ : 5,000, for their
Part A and Part B allocation of costs. For their Part C allocation, for projects of specific
benefit to the Member, in which the Member elects to participate, the Member will be
assessed on a case by case basis.
19. Termination of Membership.
Association of Russian River Public Agencies - Revised
6 08/15/02
DRAFT
(a) Causes. The membership and rights of membership shall terminate on
the occurrence of any of the following causes:
(1) the voluntary resignation of a Member with notice as prescribed
by Section 19(b) below;
(2) the nonpayment of dues or assessments subject to the limitations
set forth in Section 19(¢) below; or
(3) the occurrence of an event which renders an entity no longer
eligible for membership, as determined by the Board of Directors.
(b) Resignation by Giving Notice. The membership of any Member of the
Association shall automatically terminate on such Member's written request for
termination delivered to the Chair of the Board of Directors. 8uoh notice shall be given
at least sixty (60) days before the effective date of such resignation. There shall be no
refund of any dues or assessments upon such resignation.
(0) Nonpayment of Dues or Allocated Costs. Any Member, which fails to
pay its dues or allocated costs when due and within one hundred and twenty (120) days
thereafter shall terminate its membership at the end of such one hundred and twenty
(120) day period. Termination is effective upon the majority vote of the Board of
Directors. Such Member shall be given fifteen (15) day's prior written notice of the
termination stating the reasons therefore. The notice shall be given personally to such
Member or sent by first-class mail to the last address of such Member as shown on the
records of the Association.
(d) Effect of termination. All rights of a Member in the Association shall
cease on the termination of such Member's membership. Termination shall not relieve
the Member from any obligation for charges incurred or service or benefits actually
rendered before the date of termination.
(e) Application of this Section. For purposes of this Section only, the term
"Member" shall include Associate Members and ex officio members.
20... Procedures. The Board of Directors may adopt bylaws, rules of conduct of
meetings, and operating procedures. The administrative procedures and policies of a
Member agency may be adopted by the Association.
21. Meetings. The Association shall provide for regular and special meetings in
accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with section 54950)
of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code) or with any successor
provision.
22. Reports to Member Agencies. Each year the Association shall submit a
written report to the governing body of each of the Member agencies. This report shall
describe the technical and financial activities of the Association during the preceding
year.
23. Offices. For the purposes of forming the Association and for initial
operation, the Board of Directors shall designate a location for the principal office of the
Association and provide notice of the location to all Members, Associate Members, and
ex officio members. The Board of Directors is hereby granted full power and authority
to change said principal office from one location to another. Fifteen days prior to such
Association of Russian River Public Agencies- Revised
7 08/15/02
DRAFT
change, the Chair shall each Member, Associate Member, and ex officio member in
writing of the change.
24. Termination. This MOU shall remain in effect until terminated by a two-
thirds majority vote of all Member agencies.
25. Disposition of Property and Surplus Funds. At the termination of this
MOU, any and all properly, funds, assets, and interests therein of the Association shall
become the property of and be distributed to the Member agencies. Money collected
from Member agencies and held in reserve by the Association for payment of costs of
programs shall be allocated among Member Agencies in proportion to each agency's
contributions to such reserves. Ail other property, funds, assets, and interests shall be
distributed to Member agencies in proportion to each agency's contributions to the
Association for costs set forth in the annual budgets.
26. Minutes. The clerk appointed by the Board of Directors of the Association
shall cause to be kept minutes of all meetings of the Board of Directors, and shall cause
a copy of the minutes to be forwarded to each member of the Board of Directors
27. Effective Date. This MOU shall become effective and the Association shall
be established when at least three agencies have authorized its execution.
Association of Russian River Public Agencies- Revised
8 08/15/02
Memorandum of Understanding Creating
the Association of Public Agencies in the Russian River Watershed
Exhibit A
Memorandum of Understanding Creating
the Association of Public Agencies in the Russian River Watershed
Exhibit B
Memorandum of Understanding Creating
the Association of Public Agencies in the Russian River Watershed
Exhibit C
Mission Statement
Facilitate partnerships across political boundaries that promote stewardship of the
Russian River watershed resources.
Goals & Objective~
Goal #1' Bring together cities and local agencies to work cooperatively and
effectively on issues of common interest.
Objectives_.' 1. Promote the development and implementation of cooperative restoration and
protection efforts throughout the watershed.
2. Promote a regional alliance that supplements local government programs.
Goal #2: Be proactive on watershed-based regulation, which increasingly affects
areas beyond traditional political boundaries.
Objectives:
__
1. Increase the knowledge and experience base of local agencies in responding
to regulatory actions.
2. Develop a unified voice for the Russian River cities and Public agencies
pertinent to existing regulations.
3. Monitor legislation and take positions on behalf of the Russian River cities and
public agencies.
Goal#3: Work cooperatively to increase eligibility for watershed based funding.
Objectives: 1. Develop joint proposals for funding.
2. Leverage the strength of public support for local, state, federal, and other
funding.
3. Support programs that implement the mission & goals of the Russian River
cities and public agencies
Goal#4: Maximize effective use of resources.
_Objectives: 1. Efficiently share expenses by leveraging limited funding on coordinated efforts.
2. Efficiently share information and increase communication among members.
3. Undertake a cooperative education program.
Goal#5: Enhance the Association's influence on local, state, and federal policies
and programs.
Objectives: 1. Speak with a unified voice representing interests of the Russian River area.
2. Develop liaisons and communicate effectively with key officials.
Goal#6' Educate communities about the importance of watershed stewardship.
.Objectives: 1. Increase education on the importance of habitat restoration and protection and
implementation of sustainability concepts.
2. Conduct outreach that attracts volunteers to cooperative programs.
3. Increase public awareness on the values of holistic planning.
4. Serve as an informational clearinghouse - repository of information to provide
collective presentation of ecosystem stewardship values.
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES
PUBLIC AGENCY ASSOCIATION FOR THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED
August 15, 2002, 2:00 P.M.
Windsor Town Hall, Building 400
Goals of the Association
Goal #1: Bring together cities and local agencies to work cooperatively
and effectively on issues of common interest.
Goal #2: Be proactive on watershed-based regulation, which increasingly
affects areas beyond traditional political boundaries.
Goal #3: Work cooperatively to increase eligibility for watershed based
funding.
Goal #4: Maximize effective use of resources.
Goal #5: Enhance the Association's influence on local, state, and federal
policies and programs.
Goal #6: Educate communities about the importance of watershed stewardship.
Terms of the Memorandum of Understandin.q (MOU)
Types of Members
- Members
· Any local or regional public agency regulated under the Clean Water
Act and/or Safe Drinking Water Act
· Must be signatory to the MOU
· One vote per member agency
- Associate Members · Entities supportive of purposes of the Association
· Advisory capacity, non-voting
· Membership is at will of the board of directors
- Ex Officio Members · State and Federal agencies with regulatory authority over or an interest
in the watershed
· Non-voting and serving at the will of the board of directors
Board of Directors - One representative of each member agency
- Board member and alternate board member appointed by member agency
- Each board member has one vote '
- 2/3 majority vote required to adopt or modify the budget or approve contracts in
excess of $10,000
- Unanimous vote required to modify the MOU
- Quorum equals majority of the board members
- On unanimous vote the board may appoint an executive board of 5 or more
members if the total number of member agencies exceeds 17
Officers
- Chair
· Elected by the board of directors
· Oversees association and activities of officers, staff, consultants
· Preferably an elected official from a member agency
-Vice Chair
· Serves as chair in the absence of the chair
-Treasurer / Controller · Financial officer of one of the member agencies
· Appointed by 2/3s vote of the board
· Member agency of the treasurer may charge the association for these
services as approved by the board
-Clerk and Legal Counsel · May be appointed by board if appropriate
· Member agency of the clerk or legal counsel may charge the
association for these services as approved by the board
-Executive Director
· May be appointed by the board to administer the association
· Member agency of the executive director may charge the
association for these services as approved by the board
· Carries out direction from the board, plans and organizes association
activities, authorizes expenditures within limits, makes
recommendations to the board
Annual Budget and Work plan
- Annual Work Plan: Description of the work to be done in the ensuing fiscal year
including the following categories of work:
¢-~ '.~ ·PartA: Overhead
'4:2 · Part B' Programs of general benefit to all member agencies
· Part C: Programs of specific benefit to one or more member agencies ,
· Adopted by the board by. January ,1st each year
- Budget -'
· Fiscal year: July 1 through June 30
· Includes funds and allocatio~ of~"~ts to member agencies for work plan
parts A, B and C.
· Must be adopted before start of the fiscal year
-Dues and Allocated Costs
· Board may assess dues not to exceed
· Costs for parts A and B of the budget will be allocated to member
agencies as follows:
¼ of costs divided equally among member agencies
¼ of costs allocated in proportion to each member agency's
operating budget
· Costs for part C of the budget are allocated to participating member
agencies in proportion to the benefit received as determined by the
board when each program is approved.
AGENDA
ITEM NO:
MEETING DATE:
lOa
September 4, 2002
S U t4 t4 A RY REPORT
SUB.1ECT: CONSZDERATZON OF OPERATI'ON FLAGS' REC~UEST TO DI'SPLAY
STATE STREET FLAGS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2002
In correlation with the September 11th memorial event planned by local Veterans' groups,
Operation Flags has requested permission to display the American flags along State Street
on that day. Attached for your information is a letter from Jerry Erickson, Chairman of
Operation Flags, as well as a list of the regularly scheduled days on which the flags are
displayed. Staff is requesting approval for this one-day exception to the flag schedule.
RECOMMENDED ACTI:ON: Grant permission for Operation Flags to display American
flags on State Street on September 11, 2002.
ALTERNATI'VE COUNCI*L POLI'CY OPTI'ONS: N/A
Citizens Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Operation Flags
Candace Horsley, City Manager
.lerry Erickson, Chairman, Operation Flags
1. August 29, 2002 letter from .~erry Erickson, Operation Flags
2. Operation Flags' State Street flag schedule
Approved:
C-~-~dace I:lorsley, Cit~Manager
4: CAN/ASR.911 Flags. 090402
290 East Gobbi Street
Ukiah, CA 95482
(707) 463-4226
29 August, 2002
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Ave
Ukiah, CA 95482
Dear Sir:
Operation Flags requests permission to put the American Flags out on
State Street September 11, the anniversary of the World Trade Center
Attacks. The Flags would be displayed from approximately 7AM until
6:30PM.
Respectfully,
Je~) Edckson
,~~~peration Flags
Chairman
290 East Gobbi Street
Ukiah, CA 95482
(707) 463-4226
DAYS OF THE YEAR THAT OPERATION FLAGS DISPLAY THE
AMERICAN FLAG ON STATE STREET
Days of the
Street;
year that Operation Flags display the American Flag on State
Martin Luther King Jr. Day
Presidents Day
Memorial Day
Flag Day
July 4th
Labor Day
Veterans Day
1TEM NO: 10b
MEETING DATE: September 4, 2002
AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUB3ECT:
DZSCUSSZON AND CONSZDERATTON OF PROCLAMATZON
DECLARZNG SEPTEMBER 11TH A MEMORTAL DAY AND FUNDZNG OF
SUPPLI'ES FOR MEMORZAL EVENT
We have received a request from the American Legion for a Council-approved
proclamation in memorial of the September 11th tragedy. This request in is conjunction
with the events scheduled for noon at the Alex Thomas Plaza where the various Veterans
associations and the City of Ukiah are joining together to provide a memorial service to
the September 11th victims. This item is being placed on the agenda for discussion, as
there is a draft proclamation submitted by the National Headquarters of the American
Legion and a revised version, as submitted by City staff, for Council's consideration. Staff
is requesting Council's review and discussion of the proclamations and asking for direction
as to revisions and possible approval of a Council proclamation for the September 11th,
2002 memorial event.
Additionally, staff is requesting permission to purchase patriotic items, such as flags or
ribbons, to give the public at this event, not to exceed $150.
RECOMMENDED ACTZONS: 1. Discuss, revise if necessary, and approve a
proclamation in memory of the September 11 th tragedy. 2. Approve request to purchase
event items.
ALTERNATZVE COUNCZL POLZCY OPTZONS: N/A
Citizens Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
American Legion, Post 76
Candace Horsley, City Manager
Commander Harold Maxwell, American Legion, Post 76
1. Draft American Legion Proclamation
2. Draft City Staff Proclamation
Approved:, ~ ~~"'-'~Clty~aHorsley,
nagerCandace
4:CAN/ASR.91102.090402
(City Letterhead)
Proclamation
"A Day To Remember"
WHEREAS, the unprovoked attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, upon America by foreign terrorists have thrust the
United SImtes, and other countries, into a war it never envisioned, militarily or diplomatically; and
WHEREAS, the challenges facing all the dvilized people of the world as they relate to the war on terrorism
will not end until those fanatics responsible are eliminated or brought to justice; and
WHEREAS, America is fully committed through Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Noble Eagle to
ensure our freedoms rem unfettered and sovereign for all generations, now and forever; and
WHEREAS, world opinion needs to remain focused upon the eradication of these inhuman acts perpetrated
around the globe; and
WHEREAS, one way to accomplish this is to N-EVER FORGET that those innocent victims did not die in
vain; and
WHEREAS, America can fight back by reminding the world that the deaths of these people will always be
remembered and they will be forever loved; and
WHEREAS, a noble and appropriate way to accomplish this is through the annual celebration of their living; and
WHEREAS, this commemoration should be held each Sept.. 11 throughout the land to include: · The promotion of global peace and goodwill;
· The demonstration of America's resolve and perseverance to win the war on terrorism;
· The advancement of responsible citizenship;
· The encouragement of patriotism and love of country; and
· The poignant remembrance of those innocent victims that died on Sept. 11, as heroes, one and all;
now therefore be it
RESOLVED, as the mayor (or other official) of the city of (XXXXXX), I am issuing this proclamation to
memorialize those men, women, and children who lost their lives; and be it further
RESOLVED, that this proclamation be publidzed for all to see and know that the citizens of (CITY) remem-
ber with etemal respect those whose lives were suddenly, without cause, and pointlessly taken from them on
Sept. 11, 2001.
May They Forever Rest In Peace and Abide In Our Memories
Respectfully Submitted and Approved, on this xxxxx day of xxx, 2002.
[Signature/Seal can go here.]
RIGHT INTERIOR PAGE OF PROGRAM
Create your own localized version of the proclamation, reduce to fit into the
right-hand interior page of the pre-printed program, provided in the booklet.
VV~tEREAS~ the unprovoked attacks of September 11~ 2001~ upon America by foreign
terrorists have thrust the United States, and other countries, into a position it never envisioned,
miIitarily or ~'plomaticMIy: and
~EREAS, the chaIIenges facing ali the ci~ih'zed people of the worId as they relate to the
war on terrorism may not end until those responsibIe are brought to justice: and
VV~tEREAS~ America is fuIIy involved through Operation Enduring Freedom and
Operation NobIe EagIe to ensure our £reedon~ remain unfetteredandsovereign for aIIgenerations,
now and forever: and
Vv~HEREAS, world opinion must remain focused upon en~'ng these inhuman acts
perpetrated around the globe: and
V~HEREA S, one way to a ccomph'sh this is to IV~ V~R FORGET th a t those innocent ~ictims
didnot die in vain: and
V~HEREA S, America can &'~h t back b y remin ding the world tha t the deaths of these peopIe
~ll Mways be remembere~ and they will be forever love~, and
V(HEREAS, a nobIe andappropriate way to achieve this is through the ceIebration of their
li~in~, and
VV~HEREAS this commemoration shouId be held on September 11, 2002 throughout the
land to incIude: the promotion of globalpeace and goodwiII: the demonstration of America's
resolve an d perse veran ce against terrorism: th e advan cement o£responsible citizenship:
the encouragement of patriotism and love of country: and the poignant remembrance oft hose
innocent ~ictims who died on September 11, as heroes, one andaII.
NO V~, THEREFORE, I, Philh'p Ashiku, Mayor of the City of Ukiah, on behMf of m y feI/ow
City Councilmembers, Phil Baldv~n, Kathy Libby~ Roy Smith, and Eric Larson, do hereby
proclaim September ll~ 2002~ as
DA Y TO REMEMBER " Ih: THE CITY OF UKIA H
to memorialize those men, women, and children who lost their lives, and urge all the citizens of
Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley to remember with eternal respect those whose lives were suddenly,
without cause, and pointlessly taken from them on September 11, 2001.
May They Forever Rest In Peace and Abide In Our Memories.
Date: September 4, 2002
Phillip Ashiku, Mayor
AGENDA
ITEM NO'
MEETING DATE:
10c
September 4, 2002
SUMMARY REPORT
SUB.1ECT: DISCUSSTON AND PRIOR~T~ZATION OF GOALS
The 2002-03 fiscal year budget contains the goals and objectives for each department
within the City organization. Council approved these goals (attachment 1), with the
adoption of the budget in 3une 2002. However, there may be additional goals and
objectives, not delineated specifically by departments that the Council may wish to
designate for the staff in our work plan for the coming year. Some of the projects and
goals that Council discussed in the past and may wish to see included as Council directed
objectives are: development of a skateboard park, increased business recruitment efforts
towards industrial jobs, continued analysis and dialogue with the owner of the Palace
Hotel structure to determine a final outcome, planning for additional bike lane/pedestrian
path development, analysis of traffic congestion problems and solutions, completion of the
process for solving the water and waste water concerns, widening of Talmage Road,
analyzing and developing options for housing, continued encouragement of downtown
renovations, enhancement of revenues, and quality of life issues. Certainly, some of these
projects would be considered long-term goals of five years or more, but Council's listing of
desired outcomes will assist staff to pursue progress on these particular items.
In addition, there was discussion last year of distributing a survey to the community that
would provide feedback to the Council and staff on various issues within the City to
prioritize community needs and desires. Staff will be presenting more information on
possible survey development at the meeting.
There are many other projects and goals that Council may wish to bring forward as
specific items for staff to consider in our work plan this year. Staff is requesting Council's
discussion and direction regarding these items.
RECOMMENDED ACTI:ON: Discuss goals and objectives and provide direction to staff.
Requested by'
Prepared by:
Coordinated with'
Attachments:
N/A
Candace Horsley, Gib/Manager
N/A
Accomplishments and Goals for 2002/2003
Approved :~_~"~~~,
Candace Horsley, Ci~ Manager
4:CAN/ASR.0203Goals.090402 ~
0
0
0
Z
o
o := c-
~ ._o c o. ,-
o t~ t~
O
ok~LU
p,
~--~
0 II -I~
~o~
~.~o
"~0~
Q
o~
ILl
o:~
·
~OoE
o
o~ ~~o
I
,,, 8'0
o g
o ~
~ o
~ 0 '~ 0
o~
Q O O
E ~ ~ .[ ~ ~ 'E
· - .~ ~ ~
'a 'E
O
.- E!8~
~ N
o~>
o Oi_oa~
t--
Ii_
UJ
0 C~
~o
~o~~E~
~~E[E~
O~ ~
~ ~ ~ ,~ 0 0 --
.-- ~
~ o . ~ o ~ · t
o · ~ o'-~ ~ ~
oo~~o~
Z
.c_
I,...
._
._~
~zz
E
0
0
~ 0 CD
.--
0 ~
o~~
0
>,-~ >
~-- 0 CD
~ C__~
~) (~ '--
0
0
.--
~o~
ILl
c
0
0
×
0
0
0
0
'0
c'-
._~
o'~
"'E
'~ 0
>'6
(~ o
~Z
~~Z
o
'-- tO
E~
'~ .--
o~-
zm
E
~ 8 _mc
.~ 'E ~ c
c .~ O~ ~ ~ ~
0
~~ ~ ~ ~o o · x
~ · ~ '--~ ~ 0
~ E~ ~o~
~ ~o ~ ~o oo
_ ._ ~ -~ .~ ~
E~°: ~ E ~~ ~
..... c ~.~ ....
~EE~E8~
0 ~ 0 0 0 0 E'E 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0
0 0
· o
o
E -~ ~-
~8
~o
o 'o
~'~
O0
0
t-- ·
0
°~
0
0
>
4--'
>
--..
c .c_ ~
~ '
~ ~ c om ~._
~'-~
· -
EEE EEo
O O O ~ ~ O O ~ O ~ ~
ooo~oo~o~
0
o
....~ .~ ~ ~ ~ .~
__ ~
2~c
o c~ c E E~'~ ~----
~ 0 0 0 00~ 0 0
oI-
zz
LULU
E '~
E ~ E
0 ~- CD
· -- 0
"-' E
0
-'-' E
~ 0 __
'4--'
t- 0 o
~ ,~_ 0
~- 0
~ E c~
I... "---
E '~
0 ~ -1~ (~
I.- ·
~ ~ 0 '~
~ E ~-
.~: 0
.--
4--'
· ~ : .-
4--'
0
o E .__.
mo o --
E >~ o .o_-~
0 ~ '~
'-- ~
~ 0
o~ ~
EmE E
o~
8 8 ~
~0 ~ '~ c
~ E
~~ ~--
0 0 · 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0
00~00~0 _0
AGENDA
ITEM NO:
MEETING DATE: September 4, 2002
SUMMARY REPORT
SUB.1ECT: DISCUSSION AND SELECTION OF COUNCILMEMBERS FOR LEAGUE OF
CALIFORNIA CITIES REDWOOD REGION POLICY COMMITTEES
The City has been contacted by Karen Oslund, First Vice-President of the Redwood Region
of League of California Cities, requesting an update on which League policy committees
the Councilmembers would like to serve on. Currently, Phil Baldwin is appointed to the
Community Services Committee, Roy Smith to the Employee Relations Committee, and
Eric Larson to the Transportation, Communication and Public Works Committee. Ms.
Oslund is asking whether these Councilmembers would like to continue on these
committees, would like to change to another committee that has vacancies, or whether
other Councilmembers would like to be appointed. The list of policy committees with
vacancies and a description of each committee is attached for your information.
RECOI~II~IENDED ACT]:ON: Discuss and select Councilmembers for various committees.
ALTERNATI'VE COUNC:[L POLI'CY OPTI'ONS: N/A
Citizens Advised:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Coordinated with:
Attachments:
N/A
Karen Oslund, First Vice-President of the Redwood Region of the
League of California Cities
Candace Horsley, City Manager
N/A
League Policy Committee Vacancies and related materials
Approved:
Candace Horsley, City~lanager
4:CAN/ASR. LeaguePolicyComm.090402
VIA FAX: 463-6204
TO:
Candaee Horsley, City Manager, Ukiah
FROM:
Karen Oslund
1st VP, Rodwod Region of League of CA Cities
459-3056
Here are the known and suspected vacancies on policy committees for the
upcoming year. I will need to know whether Roy Smith, Erie Larson and Phil
Baldwin would like to keep their current appointment.
Administrative _Services:
One possible vacancy
Communi~ Services:
One definite vacancy
Phil Baldwin-reappoint?
F. molovee Relations:
Ro~-St-nith--reappoint?
Favimnmenml Oualitv:
No vacancies
Ho-sin~_ Community and Economic Dev¢looment:
-.
No vacancies
Revenue_ and Taxation
One definite vac~cy
Transportation. Communiestlon and Public Works:
Eric Larsow-Reappoint?
I have been contacting everyone who held a policy committee appointmem in the
past year, so additional vacancies may open up. Also, it is possible that a vacancy
listed here could be filled during the next few days. Please consider this a working
~O/IO'd EgsI6S~£OL S±I33I~ ~0 A£I3 8~:~1 EOOE-gE-9~
This document will be included with
policy committee appointment letters.
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNI ES POLICY EES
Subject Area Responsibilities
Administrative Services
This committee is concerned with administrative activities including election law and administration,
insurance, tort reform. The committee's scope of activities also includes efficiency and internal
organizational structure and administration, the Fair Political Practices Act, the Brown Act, Public Records
and tobacco control.
Community Services
This committee is concerned with the administration of parks and recreation programs, human services
and cultural activities, libraries and the planning and coordination of human services.
Empipyee Relations
This committee is concerned with the many facets of personnel administration, including employee
relations, retirement and workers' compensation issues.
Environmental Quality_
This committee is concerned with all aspects of air, the supply and distribution of domestic water, solid
waste, hazardous materials, coastal issues, noise pollution, and CEQA. In addition, the committee is
concerned with the issues related to energy and utilities.
Housin¢l, Community. and Economic Development
This committee is concerned with building regulations and code enforcement, community development,
urban renewal, housing, planning, zoning, incorporation, annexation and redevelopment.
Public Safety_
This committee is concerned with fire protection, law enforcement, disaster preparedness and
communications.
Revenue and Taxation
This committee is concerned with finance administration, taxation reform, revenue needs and revenue
sources at the federal, state and local levels.
Transportation. Communications and Public Works
This committee is concerned with all aspects of public works and transportation including air, bus,
automobile, mass transit and telecommunications.
$±I~IM ~0 A±ID
legisl~oli~\pCmspon..,j
8~:PI ~00C-9~-9R~
Note: This document will be included with
policy committee appointment letters.
Recommended Practices for
Participation in Lea e Policy Committees*
PRA~IC.~. #1: When you assume a committee assignment, set up a discussion
meeting with your predecessor to effect a smooth transition.
Pt~.CTICE~ #2: To familiarize yourself with your committee's current business,
accee~ information from the League Web site ~vww. cacities, orcl, i.e., prior meeting
notices, work programs, Summary of Existing Policy and Guiding Principles, meeting
highlights, etc. If you have any questions, contact the League office: (916) 658-8224.
P .RAC~ICR #3: Assimilate the pertinent information, looking closely for issues that
have a direct bearing on your division or department. After isolating those issues,
establish criteria based on relevance to your division or department interests, then rank
them in terms of importance.
P.,,.RAC?ICR #4: Contact the League staff member on your committee to gain some
insights on the framework and nuances of your specific committee, i.e., identifying the
most sensitive areas and subjects of interest; determining the understood, but often
unstated, protocols, etc. In other words, get up to speed and plot the minefield.
PRACTICE #5: Formulate an initial set of positions that reflect your division or
department's best interests. Make a brief presentaUon to your division/department
membership and make notes of the ensuing discussion.
pRAC?IC~. #6: Formulate a final set of these positions for use at the policy
committee meeting, using notes reflecting the collective judgment of your
divlsion/department membership.
PI~. CTICR # 7: Prepare for policy committee discussion by drafting a succinct,
logical argument for each issue. (Do not try to wing it.) The argument should rest
upon agreed or commonly understood facts. Be simple in its approach (a near-
syllogistic structure is usually the most persuasive in a committee environment); and, to
the extent practical, include carefully selected phrases, references or insights from
earlier meetings. As identified in Practices 2 & 3, include those most compatible with
your own position. This builds an implicit allegiance with more established members of
the committee and builds your effectiveness as an entering member.
-OVER-
SllqqlM ~0 AII9
6a:~I ~00~-ga-gAU
~PRACTICS #8: Take notes on highlights of the committee's deliberations, especially
o'-n those issue-~ that relate most directly to your division/department positions, as
formulated in Practice 3 & 4. Also, with as accurate a vote count as you can obtain,
record any actions taken by the committee. Identify the opinions of other members
that seem most closely aligned with the preferred positions of your division/department.
PI~..~CTIC]~ #9: Using the notes and materials from the committee meeting, prepare a
~rief report for presentation to your division or department for its next meeting. Be
sure to list and/or cite any technical reports, position papers, analyses, etc., that expand
the knowledge of, or provide insight into the final positions taken by the committee.
Identify those representatives of other divisions or departments who seemed most
closely aligned with your preferred positions, the members that seemed farthest from
your preferred positions, and outline the salient points in the arguments of each so that
your division has a sense of context. Summarize what was accomplished and outline
the committee's probable path forward.
pI~,C?ICE # 10: Based on the discussion after your report to the division or
~iepartment, f°r~ulate a revised set of positions and begin preparation for the next
committee meeting, as outlined in Practices 4 through 7 above.
'Several years ago. a member of the East Bay Division, Larry Damon, Mayor Pro Tern, El Cerrito, created
an initial set of recommended practices for his division's representatives on League policy committees.
His goal was to have some written guidelines in order tO establish a better continuity of policy committee
members within his division. This document is derived from Larry's "Practices," but, for purposes of
clarity, includes pertinent updates and minor changes.
G:~LEGlSLTV~OLICY%o ractlces.doc
S1199IN ~0 AIID