HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin 04-17-96MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page I
The City Council convened at 6:52 p.m., in a regular meeting, of
which the agenda was legally noticed and posted, in the Ukiah Civic
Center Council Chambers, 300 Seminary Drive, Ukiah, California.
Roll was taken and the following Councilmembers were present:
Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. Staff
present: City Manager Horsley, City Attorney Rapport, Public
Utility Director Barnes, Finance Director Elton, Assistant to the
City Manager Harris, and Assistant Redevelopment Director
DeKnoblough, and Executive Assistant Yoast.
2. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance
Assistant City Manager Harris delivered the Invocation and Mayor
Schneiter led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Proclamation Declaring April 23 as Second Annual Youth Service
Day in Coordination with Natlonal Youth Service Day
Mayor Schneiter read the Proclamation and presented to Tammi
Weselski who expressed appreciation and accepted it for Youth
Service Ukiah.
APPROVAL/CORRECTION OF MINUTES
4a. Regular Adjourned Meeting of April 2, 1996
M/S Shoemaker/Malone to approve the minutes of the regular
adjourned meeting of April 2, 1996, as submitted. The motion was
carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mastin, Malone,
Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None.
4b. Regular Adjourned Meeting of April 3, 1996
Councilmember Shoemaker requested the spelling changed from "Caden"
to Caton. M/S Shoemaker/Malone to approve the corrected minutes of
the regular adjourned meeting of April 3, 1996, as submitted. The
motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mastin,
Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None.
4c. Regular Meeting of April 3, 1996
Councilmember Malone requested a change on Page 4, under
Councilmember Reports, Councilmember Malone, change "Riggs" to
"Hauser", and noted that it was Mayor Schneiter who reported on
the request for sister City, as he was listed twice under COuncil
reports.
5. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION
Mayor Schneiter reviewed Government Code Section 1094.6 of the
California Code of Civil Procedures.
CONSENT CALENDAR
M/S Wattenburger/Mastin to move Item 6d, Adoption of Plans,
Specifications, and Engineer's Cost Estimate for the Extension of
Airport Park Blvd. Within the Airport Industrial Park and Authorize
the Notice Inviting Bids for the Performance of the Work from the
city Council Consent Calendar, and place it on the Redevelopment
Agency meeting agenda; and to adopt the Consent Calendar as
follows:
6a. Received
disbursements.
and approved report regarding March 1996
6b. Denied claim received from Mark Sparso, and referred it to the
City Insurance Carrier, REMIF.
6c. Awarded bid for high voltage line clearing and tree trimming
at various locations within the City, to Marvins Garden in an
amount not to exceed $30,000 as budgeted in Acct. 800-3728-250.
397
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 1
398
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 2
6e. Receive proposed budget and funding request from Mendocino
Transit Authority to Mendocino Council of Governments.
6f. Authorized budget amendment for unanticipated training
expenses of sponsoring two Police recruits through the basic Police
Academy, in the amount of $6,000 to Account 100-2001-640 from the
general fund balance.
6g. Adopted Resolution No. 96-53 abolishing on-street parking
spaces and establishing a no parking zone/bus loading zone on the
south side of mill street along the frontage of 209 Mill Street and
the adjacent parcel to the west.
6h. Waived irregularity in bid not material to cost or performance
and awarded contract to T&T Paving, Inc, DBA Valley Paving of
Redwood Valley, in the amount of $13,088.98 for the construction of
ADA curb ramps (Phase I) near Main Street Library and Low Gap
County Buildings, Spec. No. 95-20; and authorized the use of
unobligated funds within Account No. 300-9631, Curb, Gutter,
Sidewalk Repair, in the amount of $3,789 of which $2,489 is to be
utilized to fund the contract above the funding level approved by
MCOG and $1,300 is to be reserved for cost overruns by reason of
actual quantities exceeding estimated quantities and/or unforeseen
work.
6i. Declared Public Safety Department Vehicles as surplus property
and allowed Department of Public Safety to sell or trade these
vehicles for a newer, serviceable detective vehicle; and if sold,
proceeds to be deposited in Account 698-275-201 until replacement
can be secured.
The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES:
Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES:
None.
7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
No audience came forward.
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
9a. Petition to Reconsider Demolition Permit Application for
Structure at 400 East Perkins Street
The Planning Director reported on the petition received by the
City Manager from Sizzler and the property owner, expressing
concern for the adjacent historical home still unmoved, and
ongoing concern regarding trespassing on the parcel and the
Sizzler's insurance company is concerned regarding a fire hazard.
He explained staff's recommendation to the City Council is to
reconsider its earlier decision at a future council date or refer
back to staff to work with owner to see if it can be moved.
Council queried staff regarding possible options.
Jeff Trouette, Maple Avenue, stated he speaking for property owner
Mr. Quan, and outlined the owners past years efforts to get this
house moved, with no success and asked that Council allow the house
to be demolished, and explained how they planned to reuse the
lumber.
Mayor Schneiter stated the condition of what he has seen is less
than desirable in regards to health and safety. He indicated the
slowness to clean up the adjacent parcel does not show much of an
aggressiveness in cleaning up the area.
Mr. Trouette cited last years large rainfall amounts as the reason,
and indicated this structure would be removed timely.
Mr. Bafia, owner of Sizzler, 404 E. Perkins, explained that his
problem is with the procrastination regarding the building and
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 2
399
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 3
cited incidents where transients have affected his employees and
customers, who have complained to him in addition to his insurance
company's potential fire concern.
Judy Pruden, 304 S.Hortense, Chairman of Demolition Review
Committee, reminded Council this property is on the state
historical list. She requested Council refer direction back to
staff to form a subcommittee and immediately began processing and
find a solution to this problem this week, which will be referred
to the Demolition Review Committee for recommendation to Council.
She indicated that success in making this work is working with the
property owner, as dealing with an agent makes progress very
difficult. Mr. Quan needs to attend the meetings as we can probably
solve his problem if he will come in and work with us. She noted
this issue should be able to come back to Council by May 1 with a
staff report regarding solutions and time frames as well as other
things the Council would like to see done.
Mayor Schneiter stated your premise is based on cooperation by the
property owner. Absent any cooperation when it comes back, Council
will have to make a determination on the matter.
Ms. Pruden indicated there are resources in this community and she
feels if we have the cooperation of the owner they can be
successful, noting people have gone to talk to the owner's agents,
who have discouraged them.
Discussion ensued regarding moving the structure, availability of
buyers, lots, and costs.
M/S Malone/Mastin to refer this matter to staff and bring back to
Council May 1 or May 15. The motion carried with the unanimous
voice vote of all AYE.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:00 p.m.
Sa. Adoption of Resolution Approving The Nondisposal Facility
Element, Dated March 22, 1996, as Prepared by The Mendocino Solid
Waste Management Authority (MSWMA) Pursuant to AB 939 As Mandated
by The State of California, And Accept City's Solid Waste
Management Plan
The Public Works Administrator reported AB 939 requires adoption of
this document by all participating cities, which was prepared by
Mike Sweeney, Manager of Mendocino Solid Waste Management
Authority, and outlined the procedures required for adoption. She
noted changes on page 6 since the draft Non Disposal Facility
Element was previously received by Council. She reported this is
an informational document and datelines are estimated figures.
Council queried Mr. Sweeney regarding listed proposed sites and
surrounding legal issues.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED - 7:14 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 7:15 P.M.
M/S Malone/Wattenburger to approve the Non Disposal Facility
Element, NDFE and adopt the Resolution No. 96-54, adopting the
Non Disposal Facility Element (NDFE) document as submitted, and
establishing it as a part of the City of Ukiah's Solid Waste
Management Plan. The motion was carried by the following roll call
vote; AYES: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor
Schneiter. NOES. None.
Bb. Appeal of Planning Commission,s Denial of Variance Application
No. 96-05, as Filed by Friedman Brother,s Hardware, to Exceed the
Building Height Limit Required for a Structure in the Airport
Industrial Park Planned Development, from 50 to 70 Feet, for the
Purpose of Constructing a 70 Ft. High Flagpole on a Property
Located in the Airport Industrial Park, at 1235 Airport Park Blvd
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 3
4OO
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 4
Mayor Schneiter excused himself from this portion of the meeting as
he is employed by Friedman Brothers, due to conflict of interest
rulings. He explained that Vice-Mayor Shoemaker will conduct the
Public Hearing.
The Associate Planner reported on the history of the project and
the Planning Commission's deliberations. He explained the variance
application was denied by the Planning Commission because it would
be a grant of special privilege; is not required; the lower
flagpole would not deprive the applicants of anything; and their
concern relative to safety matters due to its close proximity to
the airport.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED - 7:17 P.M.
Ed Sohl, 155 Alice Street, Santa Rosa, Project Architect for
Friedman Brothers Hardware Store, distributed a sketch of the
flagpole to show the magnitude of the proposal and the issue of 70
feet. He noted the Business Park currently allows for structures
of 50 feet in height, and explained the area used for the 10 foot
mechanical apparatus that would bring the structure to 60 feet.
Harry Friedman, partner of Friedman Brothers, explained Friedman's
philosophy regarding flying a large American Flag, and the history
of the Santa Rosa Store flag and Friedman's flag procedures and
requested the approval of this request so they are able to install
the flag for everyone to enjoy.
John McCowen, P.O. Box 454, Ukiah, noted he was favorable to
Friedman's project and Mr. Friedman's arguments do not persuade him
that the pole should be over the 50 ft. level.
Mr. Sohl pointed out one of the findings relative to safety and the
airport, is unjustified as the airport has a 7 to 1 slope ratio and
this flag would be not come close to that height, so is not a
concern of the airport or FAA.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 7:26 P.M.
Council questioned the height of the flag at the at the USA Gas
Station on State Street, the other Friedman store's pole height
and flag sizes.
Mr. Friedman explained, there was an existing 15 x 25 foot flag,
and it is not 70 ft. The Santa Rosa store's pole is approximately
70 feet.
Councilmember Mastin stated he supports the project and feels deep
respect for the American flag can be accomplished on a 50 foot
pole.
Councilmember Malone explained he appreciates Friedman Brothers
patriotism, yet there are still no findings to substantiate a
variance. If in the future the property is sold, a new owner
could fly any other kind of flag on it, in addition to establishing
a precedent. He agrees with City staff perspectives.
Councilmembers Shoemaker and Mastin both indicated they cannot make
legal findings.
The Associate Planner indicated there is no safety concern
regarding the adjacent Municipal Airport and advised Council to
drop it as a finding.
M/S Mastin/Malone to uphold the Planning Commission's denial of
Variance Application No. 96-05, with the following findings: 1. The
seventy-foot height of the proposed flagpole would be a grant of
special privilege inconsistent with the limitations required of
other properties in the Industrial Park; and 2. The seventy-foot
height of the proposed flagpole is not required due to any
circumstances applicable to the property and would not deprive the
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 4
401
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 5
applicant of any use enjoyed by other properties in the industrial
park. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote; AYES:
Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Vice-Mayor Shoemaker. NOES.
None. Absent: Mayor Schneiter.
Mayor Schneiter returned to the meeting at 7:31 p.m. and
Councilmember Shoemaker left his chair and joined the audience at
this time.
8c. Appeal of Planning Commission,s Denial of Use Permit 96-02, as
Filed by Buck Ganter, to Allow the Construction of a 1,293 Sq. Ft.
Second Unit on a .38 Acre Parcel Within the R-1 Zoning District,
Located at 725 Walnut Avenue
The Associate Planner reported the Planning Commission considered
this application and voted 2-2 on March 27, 1996 to approve Use
Permit Application No. 96-02, based on findings and subject to
conditions of approval. He indicated the tie vote resulted in a
procedural error and results in a no action on the project. He
provided Council with a summary of the project.
Mayor Schneiter polled the Council if everyone had viewed the site,
as this is a quasi-judicial hearing, and all Councilmembers present
answered in the affirmative.
Council queried staff regarding lot size, the applicant could have
a second unit up to 1,820 square feet based on the 11% overall site
area criteria, code requirements for subdivisions, lot
qualifications for subdivision, Use Permit conditioning regarding
subdivision, allowed setbacks for two story construction in the
rear of the yard, and noted larger structure could be built than
what is proposed.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED - 7:41 P.M.
Craig Emerson, 710 Willow Avenue, stated he is opposed to the
rental unit project because it does not fit into the character of
a single residence neighborhood, the large square footage of the
proposed building, and the view of this project from Willow Avenue
and his back yard. He requested a condition that a restriction be
placed on this property for future subdivision.
Council queried Mr. Emerson regarding his home size, window views,
location of his home and a future planned garage, to this proposed
project.
Neighbor at 727 Grove Avenue, asked that the project be denied to
keep the integrity of the original design of these large lots,
stating that every variance weakens the zoning ordinance and the
single family design. Indicated two stories is unacceptable.
John McCowen, P.O. Box 454, Ukiah, indicated he is sympathetic to
the neighbors, but everyone must follow the codes and regulations.
He noted the overall economic development plan update approved by
Council one year ago indicated the permit process was to be
streamlined, and noted applicants have the right to expect
expedient approval of their project. He indicated the size of the
large lots warrant more use of the lots. '
Lucy Haydons, 780 Walnut Avenue, lives directly across the street
from the proposed project, and feels the project, as proposed,
would change the character of the neighborhood. She suggested
possible mitigation to minimize impacts of the proposed project, as
she does not want to see it denied, yet is concerned about future
lot split.
Bob Hildebrand, 815 Walnut, reported on the history of the
neighborhood, based on family. He stated the Ganter's choice to
make a home for their mother is a commitment to the community and
westside Ukiah is valuable to the neighborhood, because it is a
continuity of family values and indicated he supports what they are
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 5
402
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 6
doing.
Buck Ganter, 705 West Standley Street, represents his mother who
owns 725 Walnut Avenue. He explained the project meets all the
City requirements and explained the details of the project which
addressed neighbors stated concerns. He noted Mr. & Mrs. Stearns
have written that they have no concerns with the project and they
stand to have the greatest impact from the proposed building. He
explained how he addressed neighbor's concerns in the design of
this project, noting the square footage is 70% of what is allowed.
He indicated as the project is in total conformance, the City
should allow us to build this second unit to help his elderly
widowed mother.
Richard Shoemaker, 115 Brush Street, spoke in support of the Ganter
project, although he feels there was not enough discussion at the
Planning Commission regarding this project. He explained he is in
the process of buying a house on Willow Avenue, and an appraiser
told him that a two story residence would impact the value of the
home he was buying. He submitted a letter to Council suggesting two
alternatives to this project for proposed changes.
Council queried Mr. Shoemaker regarding his drawings and if there
was a building permit issued for the 710 Willow property which
allows for a second story structure involving a propsoed garage.
PUBLIC HE&RING CLOSED - 8:07 P.M.
Councilmember Malone stated in his review of the project site with
the applicant, it appears they appeared to have attempted to
minimize the impact to their neighbors.
Councilmember Wattenburger stated when he visited the site, he felt
the existing dense vegetation really covers the view of the two
windows from Dr. Emerson's house; he indicated the removal of the
two Walnut trees seems insignificant with the amount of existing
vegetation; and favors the applicants trying to create a continued
living situation with an in-law or mother and meets all criteria.
M/S Wattenburger/Mastin to grant the appeal as recommended in the
planning report with the findings; 1. The proposed second unit, as
conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and with Municipal
Code standards for second units in the R-1 Zoning District,
including those for permitted uses and occupancy requirements;
building site area; building sizes and height limits; front
setback lines and yard areas; and required parking; 2. The location
of the proposed second unit in the R-1 Zoning District is
complementary to policies and laws of the State of California,
which require local agencies to adopt a second unit ordinance for
the purpose of increasing the stock of affordable housing; 3. The
project generates no significant adverse impacts, pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act, which in fact, exempts such
projects according to categorical Exemption Class 3(b), Section
15303; and, 4. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the
proposed second unit will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working within
the neighborhood, or be detrimental to property or improvements
around the site, or be harmful to the general welfare~of the City,
because the proposed structure would conform with the use and
development standards for second units in the R-1 District; in
addition to the 21 conditions of approval in the Planning
Commission motion resulting in a tie vote at the meeting of March
27, 1996. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote;
AYES: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES.
None. ABSENT: Councilmember Shoemaker.
Recess - 8: 17 p.m.
Reconvened - 8=26 p.m.
Councilmember Shoemaker returned to his Council seat at this time.
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 6
4O3
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 7
Sd. Appeal of Planning Commission,s Denial of Use Permit
Application No. 96-08, as Filed by Axt & Mitchell for Robert
Sandelin, to Allow a 3?9 Square Foot Residence and a 1,208 Square
Foot Residence Located on a Parcel in the R-3 (General Multiple
Residential) Zoning District to Be Converted into Professional
Office Buildings, on Property Located at 311 West Perkins Street.
Mayor Schneiter polled the Council
Councilmembers had visited the site.
and determined all
The Associate Planner reported on the history of this project, and
summarized the Planning Commission'deliberation on March 27, 1996
which resulted in a 2-2 tie vote to deny Use Permit App. No. 96-08.
He reviewed staff recommendations to upholding the applicant's
appeal, and approve the proposed conversion of two residential
units to office buildings, based on the findings including in the
attached planning report, and subject to the conditions of approval
recommended in the report.
Discussion ensued regarding the effect of the Planning Commission
tie vote and classification in the general plan, with determination
that this project would not impact the housing stock in the City.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED - 8:31 P.M.
Robert Sandelin, 318 Jones Street, addressed this particular
location and issues surrounding remodel or demolish and rebuild
new. He explained the project and its benefits.
Granville Poole, Road I, Redwood Valley, noted he has property
across the street from the subject parcel, which they converted to
commercial. He explained if he were looking at that property and
wanted to reconstruct, I would never want to do as a residential
use, as commercial is the right use for this property.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 8:37 P.M.
Councilmember Malone explained when he visited the site he noted it
fronts on a parking lot and is a pretty big corridor coming out of
the downtown and it does not strike him as ideal housing stock.
Mayor Schneiter noted the intersection of Perkins and Oak Street is
very dangerous.
M/S Malone/Mastin to overturn Planning Commission denial of Use
Permit Application 96-08, to establish a commercial office use in
an R-3 zone, with the following findings; 1. It does not pose a
threat to the safety or welfare of the community; 2. It does not
deteriorate the character of the buildings or detract from the
neighborhood, and 3. Most surrounding properties in the area are of
a similar use; and to include the conditions of approval
recommended in the Planning report by City staff.
Se. Introduction of Amended Ordinance for the Airport Industrial
Park (AIP) Planned Development (Pd), as Initiated by City Staff and
Recommended by the City Planning Commission. The Proposed
Amendments Include Describing the Circulation Plan for the
Within the Text; Providing a Circulation Plan Map; Adding Language
to Permit Retail Commercial Land Uses in the Highway Commercial
Designation with the Securing of a Site Development Permit; and
Other Minor Changes
The Senior Planner reported on staff initiated amendments to the
Planned Development Ordinance. He explained Council adopted an
amendment late last year and staff is recommending further
amendments necessary to enhance the future review and development
in the park. He explained the five amendments proposed.
Discussion ensued regarding Class III bike lanes; Norgard Lane
designation for a possible Clear Zone; prevention of landlocking
streets; and wording to prevent loss of access.
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 7
404
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 8
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED - 8~50 P.M.
Gary Akerstrom, 425 Talmage Road, suggested wording regarding
class III bike lanes. He stated traffic in the Redwood Business
Park has been reduced by reducing the density by roughly 20% and
the development of the Airport Business Development Park has put
some of the traffic to the north and since the Wal-Mart EIR. He
described and expressed concern regarding various information not
in the material presented to Council.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED - 8:54 P.M.
Mayor Schneiter questioned the CEQA document that constructs the
EIR is based on a southern access, and does this ordinance change
or modify the EIR.
The Senior Planner answered that the Ordinance does not invalidate
the EIR. He explained and clarified the EIR wording regarding
this subject.
Councilmember Malone questioned what is the negative aspects of
keeping the Ordinance language as it currently is.
The Senior Planner explained the primary concern to the City,
developers and property owners is the cost of designing and
construction of the southern access road, noise and safety
measures, improvements to Norgard Lane, and a State Street
intersection which would be borne by project applicants and
developers.
Council queried staff regarding anticipated future needs and costs
regarding southern access by Public safety, Walmart development
providing secondary access, Norgard access no longer critical; and
concern for wetlands protection pertaining to restricted access.
Mr. Akerstrom explained his historical perspective of the access
issue for the park. He expressed his concern that when you
eliminate the southern access, all southern development to the
south will have to exit through the northern Business Park, and he
does not want to have to mitigate these costs.
Discussion ensued regarding timing issues of future development,
and the ramifications of a new off ramp.
M/S Shoemaker/Malone to read the proposed Ordinance by title only
with the removal of amendment Nos. 4 and 5.
Discussion followed regarding effects of these wording changes to
the proposed Ordinance.
Councilmember Shoemaker withdrew the motion with concurrence of the
seconder to the motion.
M/S Shoemaker/Malone to introduce by title only the proposed
Ordinance amending the AIP ordinance, with the deletion of Item D
of the circulation plan on page 15 and 16, and directed staff to
come back to Council regarding further discussion regarding
development affecting traffic on Norgard. The motion was carried by
a unanimous voice vote of all AYE.
The Executive Assistant read the title only of the Ordinance.
M/S Shoemaker/Malone to introduce Ordinance of the City Council of
the City of Ukiah Amending the Airport Industrial Park Planned
Development. The motion was carried by a unanimous voice vote of
all AYE.
The City Manager and City Attorney discussed capital improvement
fees and assessment district formation to fund future access
development costs.
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 8
405
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 9
It was the consensus of Council for staff to bring back possible
wording regarding a possible southern access.
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS (Cont.)
9b. Discussion Concerning Letter Received from Mendocino Council of
Governments (MCOG) Requesting support for Eel River Pump Project
The Assistant to the city Manager reported on the letter received
from MCOG, with specific direction from Council needed at this time
as whether to continue to support this project or not, considering
unknown future costs, and .county wide commitment required by the
State.
Mayor Schneiter noted the usual manner used to form a county wide
agency is to create a joint powers agreement for all to sign, and
expressed concern that MCOG may not be proper agency to be involved
in pursuing water rights.
Councilmember Wattenburger indicated the application money
requested is only a small portion of the entire future costs.
Councilmember Shoemaker stated he is the City MCOG representative,
noted he will take the message back that the requested application
costs is a pittance of what may be required in the future and if
MCOG forwards a JPA proposal to the City, then the Council will
look at that, before proceeding further. He explained he, as the
city MCOG representative, did not vote for this to come back to
you.
Discussion ensued regarding possible benefits of the proposed
diversion, diversion from the only natural, protected river in
California, MCOG's lack of expertise in water development, large
investment of time and money with little possibility for success,
MCOG's primary function is transportation, and application
processing procedures by the State.
M/S Mastin/Wattenburger to not participate in this Eel River Pump
project through MCOG. The motion was carried by the following roll
call vote: AYES: Mastin, Wattenburger, and Mayor Schneiter. NOES:
Councilmember Malone and Shoemaker.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10a. Adopt Resolution Approving Joint Powers Agreement for
Mendocino Emergency Services Authority, Approve Budget, and
Appointment of City Manager to Board of Commissioners
The City Manager reported on the history of disaster coordination
efforts and attempts to create joint emergency services for public
agencies and the County of Mendocino. She explained the state has
recently put in the standardized emergency management system which
coordinates emergency response in California, and creates one
agency for all cities in Counties, which will ensure
standardization in training and equipment. She explained the
attached agreement details staffing and participation levels with
Ukiah's share of cost $11,617 per year.
Council queried staff regarding current County Emergency Services
staffing, budget, training, cost and benefits to Ukiah, management
responsibility, insurance coverage, equipment and printing costs,
and City funding source.
M/S Wattenburger/Mastin to adopt Resolution No. 96-55 approving the
Joint Powers Agreement establishing Mendocino Emergency Services
Authority (MESA), approving the proposed budget and appointing the
City Manager to Board of Commissioners. The motion was carried by
the following roll call vote: AYES: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger,
Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None.
10b. Nomination to Fill the One Vacancy on the Planning Commission,
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 9
406
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - Aprll 17, 1996 Page 10
and Adoption of Resolution Making Appointment
Councilmember Malone nominated Brian Carter with Councilmember
Wattenburger making the second. The motion failed with the
following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Malone and
Wattenburger. NOES: Councilmembers Mastin, Shoemaker and Mayor
Schneiter.
Councilmember Malone nominated John McCowen from the current
applicant pool with Councilmember Mastin making the second. The
motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mastin,
Malone, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: Councilmember
Wattenburger.
NEW BUSINESS
11a. Adopt Resolution Approving Budget Amendment and Loan for
Ukiah Valley Conference Center
The Ukiah Valley Conference Center Manager reported on the current
financial operations of the Center and the details requiring a loan
to cover unexpected costs of operations for this fiscal year.
Discussion ensued regarding possible cost cutting ideas, service
reduction areas, computer lab use, grant applications for a
communications center, next year budget figures look favorable,
and Chamber of Commerce operations.
M/S Malone/Mastin to adopt Resolution No. 96-56 approving budget
amendment and loan for Ukiah Valley Conference Center. The motion
was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mastin, Malone,
Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None.
11b. Discussion of Proposed Land Purchase by MSWMA for Purpose of
Countywide Transfer Station as per R. Shoemaker
Councilmember Shoemaker explained that MSWMA has gone through the
last process of certifying its EIR for the North State Street site
for the transfer station, and indicated the next step is the
purchase of that property. He reported on the negotiations for that
property site and explained full approval is requested from the
City Council to go forward with that purchase. He explained the
funds to buy the property would come out of the current surcharge
and the annual debt service would be $53,000. He noted they are
looking at certificates of participation and bank financing.
Mike Sweeney, MSWMA Manager explained this project is one of the
more important things this Council will leave as a legacy to the
citizens of the community.
Discussion ensued regarding ownership, future contracted services
renting the site, and funding and operations of the project.
Councilmember Mastin asked whether the legal climate around the
North State Street facility could hold up the project for any
extended period of time.
Mr. Sweeney stated there was an EIR done and there was very little
comment done in the EIR process, noting no substantial challenges
have been made to our review. There have been no demands that the
governmental agencies did not meet, and the courts normally defer
to the discretion of the governmental body. He explained the notice
of determination is completed May 3, and should not cause delay.
Councilmember Shoemaker indicated we have 13 months of leeway.
Discussion followed relative to the clean, quiet nature of this
type of facility.
M/S Malone/Shoemaker to receive the report and send a letter of
support to MSWMA to go forward regarding the property purchase. The
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 10
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF UKIAH - April 17, 1996 Page 11
motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mastin,
Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor Schneiter. NOES: None.
The City Attorney noted Items llc. and lld. will be addressed in
public after consideration in CLosed Session.
19_.
CITY COUNCIL/REPORTS
Councilmember Mastin - Reported he attended a 20th anniversary
block party last Saturday.
Councilmember Malone - Reported on the NCRA meeting he attended,
and noted Mendocino College is doing a musical of "Anything Goes",
in which he will be doing a cameo role.
Councilmember Wattenburger - Reported on the little league opening
day last Saturday that he attended.
Councilmember Shoemaker - Reported he attended the UVSD meeting
that lasted three minutes. He invited everyone to a picnic May 5 at
Todd Grove Park, in a celebration of the March 26 election, which
starts as noon.
Mayor Schneiter - Reported he received a letter from Richmond
Sanitation Service, and requested it be agendized so Council can
receive a report and discuss it, and also agendize the
correspondence he received from Russian River Flood Control
District.
Council recessed to Redevelopment Agency at 10:36 p.m.
Council reconvened and entered Closed Session at 11:05 p.m.
13. CLOSED SESSION - a. Government Code Section 54957 - PUBLIC
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - City Manager
Council came out of Closed Session at 12:05 a.m.
11c. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Mayor to Execute Agreement for
City Manager Services with Candace Horsley
M/S Mastin/Wattenburger to approve the City Manager's contract as
revised and adopt Resolution No. 96-57 authorizing the Mayor to
execute employment agreement with Candace Horsley for City Manager
services. The motion carried with a unanimous voice vote of all
AYE.
11d. Review and Approval of Staff Restructuring Proposal Due to
Vacancy at Assistant City Manager Position
M/S Mastin/Wattenburger to approve the staff restructuring proposal
as submitted. The motion was carried by the following roll call
vote: AYES: Mastin, Malone, Wattenburger, Shoemaker and Mayor
Schneiter. NOES: None.
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 12:07
Karen Yoast, E~cutive Assistant
407
Reg. Mtg.
April 17, 1996
Page 11