Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMelton Design Group, Inc. 2019-02-13COU No.1819165 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES This Agreement, made and entered into this 13th day of Februav, 2019 ("Effective Date"), by and between CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Melton Design Group, a corporation, organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of California, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". RECITALS This Agreement is predicated on the following facts: a. City requires consulting services related to landscape architect services for Riverside Park Regeneration Project. b. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, skills, experience and properly licensed to provide these services, and is willing to provide them according to the terms of this Agreement. c. City and Consultant agree upon the Scope -of -Work and Work Schedule attached hereto as Attachment "A", describing contract provisions for the project and setting forth the completion dates for the various services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. TERMS OF AGREEMENT 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1.1 The Project is described in detail in the attached Scope -of -Work (Attachment "A"). 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 As set forth in Attachment "A". 2.2. Additional Services. Additional services, if any, shall only proceed upon written agreement between City and Consultant. The written Agreement shall be in the form of an Amendment to this Agreement. 3.0 CONDUCT OF WORK 3.1 Time of Completion. Consultant shall commence performance of services as required by the Scope -of -Work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete such services within seven months from receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall complete the work to the City's reasonable satisfaction, even if contract disputes arise or Consultant contends it is entitled to further compensation. 4.0 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 4.1 Basis for Compensation. For the performance of the professional services of this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed maximum dollar amount of $231,243. Labor charges shall be based upon hourly billing rates for the various classifications of personnel employed by Consultant to perform the Scope of Work as set forth in the attached Attachment B, which shall include all indirect costs and expenses of every kind or nature, except direct expenses. The direct expenses and the fees to be charged for same shall be as set forth in Attachment B. Consultant shall complete the Scope of Work for the not -to -exceed guaranteed maximum, even if actual time and expenses exceed that amount. 4.2 Changes. Should changes in compensation be required because of changes to the Scope -of - Work of this Agreement, the parties shall agree in writing to any changes in compensation. "Changes to the Scope -of -Work" means different activities than those described in Attachment "A" and not additional time to complete those activities than the parties anticipated on the date they entered this Agreement. 4.3 Sub -contractor Payment. The use of sub -consultants or other services to perform a portion of the work of this Agreement shall be approved by City prior to commencement of work. The cost of sub -consultants shall be included within guaranteed not -to -exceed amount set forth in Section 4.1. 4.4 Terms of Payment. Payment to Consultant for services rendered in accordance with this contract shall be based upon submission of monthly invoices for the work satisfactorily performed prior to the date of invoice less any amount already paid to Consultant, which amounts shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after receipt by City. The invoices shall provide a description of each item of work performed, the time expended to perform each task, the fees charged for that task, and the direct expenses incurred and billed for. Invoices shall be accompanied by documentation sufficient to enable City to determine progress made and the expenses claimed. 5.0 ASSURANCES OF CONSULTANT 5.1 Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely responsible for its acts or omissions. Consultant (including its agents, servants, and employees) is not City's agent, employee, or representative for any purpose. It is the express intention of the parties hereto that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee, joint venturer, or partner of City for any purpose whatsoever. City shall have no right to, and shall not control the manner or prescribe the method of accomplishing those services contracted to and performed by Consultant under this Agreement, and the general public and all governmental agencies regulating such activity shall be so informed. Those provisions of this Agreement that reserve ultimate authority in City have been inserted solely to achieve compliance with federal and state laws, rules, regulations, and interpretations thereof. No such provisions and no other provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between Consultant and City. Consultant shall pay all estimated and actual federal and state income and self-employment taxes that are due the state and federal government and shall furnish and pay worker's compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and any other benefits required by law for himself and his employees, if any. Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold City and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any claims or demands by federal, state or local government agencies for any such taxes or benefits due but not paid by Consultant, including the legal costs associated with defending against any audit, claim, demand or law suit. Consultant warrants and represents that it is a properly licensed professional or professional organization with a substantial investment in its business and that it maintains its own offices and staff which it will use in performing under this Agreement. PAGE 2 OF 7 5.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibility is solely to City. Consultant has no interest and will not acquire any direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall not in the performance of this Agreement employ a person having such an interest. If the City Manager determines that the Consultant has a disclosure obligation under the City's local conflict of interest code, the Consultant shall file the required disclosure form with the City Clerk within 10 days of being notified of the City Manager's determination. 6.0 INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Insurance Liability. Without limiting Consultant's obligations arising under Paragraph 6.2 Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it procures and maintains for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with its performance under this Agreement. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Insurance Services Office ("ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form No. CG 20 10 10 01 and Commercial General Liability Coverage — Completed Operations Form No. CG 20 37 10 01. 2. ISO Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 "any auto" or Code 8, 9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025. 3. Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. 4. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's profession. Architects' and engineers' coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability. B. Minimum Limits of Insurance Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage including operations, products and completed operations. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work performed under this Agreement, or the aggregate limit shall be twice the prescribed per occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker's compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. PAGE 3 OF 7 4. Errors and Omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. D. Other Insurance Provisions The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages a. The City, it officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects; liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, hired or borrowed by the Consultant for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope -of -protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. b. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. d. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 2. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from Consultant's performance of the work, pursuant to this Agreement. 3. Professional Liability Coverage If written on a claims -made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the effective date of this Agreement. The policy period shall extend one year from submission of final invoice for this project. PAGE 4 OF 7 4. All Coverages Each Insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. E. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with admitted California insurers with an A.M. Bests rating of no less than A- for financial strength, AA for long-term credit rating and AMB -1 for short-term credit rating. F. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish the City with Certificates of Insurance and with original Endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates and Endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The Certificates and Endorsements are to be on forms provided or approved by the City. All Certificates and Endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before Consultant begins the work of this Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. If Consultant fails to provide the coverages required herein, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or all of them. In that event, after notice to Consultant that City has paid the premium, the cost of insurance may be deducted from the compensation otherwise due the contractor under the terms of this Contract. G. Subcontractors Consultant shall include all sub -contractors or sub -consultants as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each sub -contractor or sub -consultant. All coverage for sub -contractors or sub -consultants shall be subject to all insurance requirements set forth in this Paragraph 6.1. 6.2 Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition thereto, Consultant agrees, for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement, to indemnify the City for any claim, cost or liability that arises out of, or pertains to, or relates to any negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of Consultant and its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by the City, or arising from the active negligence of the City. "Indemnify," as used herein includes the expenses of defending against a claim and the payment of any settlement or judgment arising out of the claim. Defense costs include all costs associated with defending the claim, including, but not limited to, the fees of attorneys, investigators, consultants, experts and expert witnesses, and litigation expenses. References in this paragraph to City or Consultant, include their officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors. PAGE 5 OF 7 7.0 CONTRACT PROVISIONS 7.1 Documents and Ownership of Work. All documents furnished to Consultant by City and all documents or reports and supportive data prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are owned and become the property of the City upon their creation and shall be given to City immediately upon demand and at the completion of Consultants services at no additional cost to City. Deliverables are identified in the Scope -of -Work, Attachment A. All documents produced by Consultant shall be furnished to City in digital format and hardcopy. Consultant shall produce the digital format, using software and media approved by City. 7.2 Governing Law. Consultant shall comply with the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, and all local governments having jurisdiction over this Agreement. The interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by California law and any action arising under or in connection with this Agreement must be filed in a Court of competent jurisdiction in Mendocino County. 7.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement plus its Attachment(s) and executed Amendments set forth the entire understanding between the parties. 7.4 Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect. 7.5 Modification. No modification of this Agreement is valid unless made with the agreement of both parties in writing. 7.6 Assignment. Consultant's services are considered unique and personal. Consultant shall not assign, transfer, or sub -contract its interest or obligation under all or any portion of this Agreement without City's prior written consent. 7.7 Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant, term or condition or a waiver of the covenant, term or condition itself. 7.8 Termination. This Agreement may only be terminated by either party: 1) for breach of the Agreement; 2) because funds are no longer available to pay Consultant for services provided under this Agreement; or 3) City has abandoned and does not wish to complete the project for which Consultant was retained. A party shall notify the other party of any alleged breach of the Agreement and of the action required to cure the breach. If the breaching party fails to cure the breach within the time specified in the notice, the contract shall be terminated as of that time. If terminated for lack of funds or abandonment of the project, the contract shall terminate on the date notice of termination is given to Consultant. City shall pay the Consultant only for services performed and expenses incurred as of the effective termination date. In such event, as a condition to payment, Consultant shall provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder, subject to off -set for any direct or consequential damages City may incur as a result of Consultant's breach of contract. 7.9 Execution of Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each bearing the original signature of the parties. Alternatively, this Agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission, and in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and PAGE 6 OF 7 the same instrument. When executed using either alternative, the executed agreement shall be deemed an original admissible as evidence in any administrative or judicial proceeding to prove the terms and content of this Agreement. 8.0 NOTICES Any notice given under this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered or deposited in the mail (certified or registered) addressed to the parties as follows: CITY OF UKIAH DEPT. OF COMMUNITY SERVICES 300 SEMINARY AVENUE UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 95482-5400 MELTON DESIGN GROUP, INC. GREG MELTON, PRINCIPAL 820 BROADWAY STREET CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95928 9.0 SIGNATURES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the Effective Date: MELTON P IGN GROUP, INC. BY: G MELTON 81-4: 0004 IRS IDN Number CITY OF UKIAH BY: A SANGIACOMO CIT MANAGER ATTEST CITY CLERK PAGE 7 OF 7 February 14, 2019 Date Date Date ATTACHMENT A- CONTRACT 1819165 The restoration of Riverside Park is a wonderful opportunity for the local youth and residents of Ukiah to experience the great outdoors as it is intertwined within edge of Ukiah, Little League Fields, BMX and the Russian River. Congratulations to the advocates that worked diligently to improve this riparian habitat and to the City in its award of the California Urban Rivers Grant. The site is indeed a fitting location for this purpose. We understand the goals of the City for the Project, the associated grant requirements and with similar project experience, know how to clean up the site and create a floodplain and wetland complex that will further bio -filtration and properly drain the site. The team to complete this important first stage of restoration is one of the most significant factors to consider in the approach to completing the Project. The Team of MDG, ESA and River Partners will provide the City of Ukiah with the range of experience necessary to restore this section of Riverside Park to a functioning ecosystem with educational opportunities through recreation. ESA 4 MDG M ELTOND ES 1GNGPOUP MDG has work with ESA since 2003 and River Partners since it was formed in 1998. This team of recreation and restoration design specialists have proven to be successful in creating natural environments for the public to enjoy. Recent examples include the restoration of the 210 -acre Riverbend Park along the Feather River in Oroville and the Feather River Conceptual Plan. Both projects involved the design of recreational open space along a large river, habitat restoration and interpretive education. An MDG lead carbon sequestration plan is also underway for Riverbend Park with the installation of biochar in a 10 -acre restoration area, plans for another 8 acres this spring and a monitoring system. Feather River A VISION FOR THE LOW -FLOW CHANNEL OF THE FEATHER RIVER" OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA urneeotcr ama,n t, q Supplemental Benefits Fund Seerng Cormnnee r TGA 6 monmental Seance Associates Final Plan /\ 1735 Mw190,.ySheet �7t1 Ganda Arae Suns 203 Unna s, Calicoes 95316 September 5, 2018c°r ,;Galeern,lessrndc„a,nan,s&.t M•Non Damp Gaup 309 Well Sine, dtieo, Whom* 951R6 MOW melMdg.com r Ii'A MDG MELTONDESIGNGROUP„ 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 — 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 — 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM RESTORATION DESIGN APPROACH Our goal is to assist the City with transforming the highly disturbed and degraded portions of Riverside Park into an ecologically rich corridor of wet meadows, floodplain wetlands, and spring pools, that form a central thread of the park visitor's experience. Our approach will center on understanding the hydrologic and hydraulic processes that influence Riverside Park and using this understanding to develop a technical basis of design for the habitat restoration. The hydrologic analysis will examine the sources influencing the site, including precipitation, evapotranspiration, surface water runoff from adjacent lands and the City's storm drainage system, groundwater, and periodic flooding from the Russian River. The hydraulic analysis will be used to inform the project design to reduce potential for erosion and fish entrapment and to ensure there are no increased flooding impacts from the project. Based on our field visit to the site and our understanding of the project's multi -benefit objectives to; restore habitat, improve flooding and storm water drainage, improve groundwater recharge and water quality, and provide an enhanced park experience; our approach to the Riverside Park Regeneration is to create a shallow open depression that drains to the Russian River through a broad swale. This configuration will allow the site to capture storm water runoff, while visually opening area to improve park safety and comfort. Shallow seasonal wetlands will be created within the depression and will provide habitat and improve water quality. The site would be graded to create low gradient ecotone slopes ideal for creating a broad variety of conditions for native vegetation. Creating seasonal wetlands will provide water quality improvement through capture and treatment during the wet winter season, but will remain dry during the summer season, to the benefit of the water management of the adjacent vineyards. The swale will provide access to refuge for fish and improve drainage on the receding limb of the Russian River. The proposed depression, seasonal wetland and swale approach also is well suited for linking to potential future projects such as fish habitat restoration along the Russian River or improved storm drainage from the adjacent ball parks and BMX park. The image below illustrates this approach and includes a preliminary idea of site circulation and interpretive opportunism. xPo pP4-4lw4 TO • 1 C2.-) it poi- c3,A'- s 1 S-'rbr- on o rv.l j acrj' Ft. ou' . FC.Ox.3.S • VIP- - i 4 WSJ 4012M "-NM) FLtX-Brllo^JI }"-.lccgK • W C-'i1.4"1•JP5 Lcwf4 6 hkv F ' FL.O.6.5- ar-10 c' E . FISH • 4A.0; d6t:0 f lG c- 112 5ua> a ac. fcow c„'T r vE-g- Amp GJEFuLC Fc -. p•s14curlw.1-tl4,41 F{.o iJ S ,\ 11 - 5+,'M•E' T 3 /� Drs,lw•1.., �2iwo2AOn- �./ �'�b..a� 61F V'I" t.civE.p. i ea lug Tt-'-iL_'Tv A-t4.ow p514 %AND W, --b12- t.,:Dw MDG MELTON--- ".G 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 9581 1 - 916.754.21 53 MELTONDG.COM NATURE EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES It is unique to find such a preserve next to an urban environment and such is the case that this site is very well suited to show visitors how nature can be found in an urban environment and how restoration projects can improve habitat along riparian corridors. Along with the proposed floodplain and wetland demonstration areas, the existing wildlife and riparian corridor, there are numerous opportunities to explain how important ecosystems are to each other and how they work together. By incorporating interactive educational exhibits, we can create a story line to lead visitors from one exhibit to the next, making the experience an adventure that they will not forget. MDG is excited to provide this approach in joint venture with the Environmental Science Associates (ESA) and River Partners. QUALITY IN DESIGN In creating exhibits and restoring native habitat, special attention must be paid to the quality of design. In this sense, quality means an experienced design team that can deliver project elements that will be durable and sustainable and especially in the case of interactive exhibits; attractive, fun and innovative. NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION Recreating native habitat can often be a difficult process, especially when working with slow growing oak tree seedlings in a hot summer climate. MDG is well versed in the design of native habitats for restoration. One element often overlooked is to design for a complete habitat, by creating an environment (canopy, understory and grasslands) that will function as one with the attraction of native support plant species and wildlife. GRANT REQUIREMENTS An especially important goal for the restoration of Riverside Park is to abide by the directives established in the California Urban Rivers Grant Program. MDG services include a successful history of grant writing and most of our open space design projects are grant funded. Our design team is very familiar with the guidelines established by the Grant Program and will work diligently with the City to ensure the Grant requirements are met. CARBON SEQUESTRATION Cleaning up the site, improving bio -filtration and restoring riparian habitat will all help to remove carbon dioxide from the air. Another way to help is by utilizing soil amendments like Biochar. Biochar is charcoal used as a soil amendment. It's a stable solid, rich in carbon, and can endure in soil for thousands of years. This 2,000 -year-old practice converts agricultural waste into a soil enhancer that can hold carbon and increase soil biodiversity. 5X water storage in volume reducing irrigation needs and improving bio -filtration Capture 3x it's volume in VOC's — phosphates, nitrates, methane Reducing fossil -fuel based fertilizers, enhancing cation exchange capacity increasing mycorrhizal development in soils Primarily used in agriculture, gold course managers have recently incorporated the amendment in the maintenance of their courses and MDG is now pioneering the use of Biochar in city parks and habitat restoration. Riverbend Park in Oroville, CA is a recent example as the amendment has been incorporated MDG MELTONPEP GROUP 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM in both the active sports field areas of the Park and in native plant restoration. See the illustration below for an idea of the application to the Riverbend Park soccer fields along the Feather River. r FORCE or 44 Et 1Ote.:14ii'41?►lt 1.":1' lair; VP . 5X WATER STORAGE IN VOLUME • REDUCE IRRIGATION • REDUCE PUMP COSTS • REDUCE RUNOFF BIOMASS DISPLACED • 500 JEFFER0 PINES • ELIMINATE ORGANIC MATTER USE CAPTURED VOC'S r`•L�Y1 3X ITS VOLUME • PHOSPHATES • NITRATES • METHANE • CAPTURED CO2 • ATMOSPHERIC CARBON CAPTWE THROUGH PHOTOSYNTHESIS REDUCTION IN FERTILIZER • ENHANCED MYCORRHIZAL DEVELOPMENT • ENHANCED CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY • REDUCED LEACHING OF BENEFICIAL NUTRIENTS C4t:i Lira PtIV >occ r v ses oKts C E1VNspiv TRAILS/ PICNIC FIRST CARBON NEGATIVE SOCCER PARK IN THE NATION! ADVENTURE PAINT ACH AREA RIVERBENI Water ront NORTH SOCCER PARK - OROVILLE, CA -'Y Biochar opportunities at Riverside Park include Bio Char as a soil amendment and in the form of biodegradable wattles. The wattles are like straw wattles for erosion control. They can be designed into the landscape so that they're not visible and better help to filter out toxic elements from existing site material and storm water. The rest of this section is a detailed Scope of Services outlined to provide the City of Ukiah with the services necessary to complete the Riverside Park Regeneration Project. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following is an outline of services to be Task 1 — Project Initiation and Site Analysis 1.1 Kick off Meeting — Meet with City Staff to confirm the City's objectives and program for the project, to establish parameters for the design effort, and to confirm interim and final deliverables. A. Review Project Team Coordination for duration of Project. B. Agree upon project schedule C. Refine project program and confirm with City Staff input. 1.2 Topographic Survey Adequacy Review This task includes reviewing the topographic data collected by the City to determine whether there is adequate data for project design. MDG MELTONDEStGNGROUP 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM 1.3 Base Map The topography file(s) will be converted to a base map, 3-dimensional surface, and/or CAD file consisting of "existing condition information" that will be used for hydrodynamic modeling and design drawings. 1.4 Preliminary Site Analysis A. Review Topographic survey relative to potential design options. B. Obtain and review all existing site data, information from City and Stakeholder agencies, 1. Review all appropriate City and County documents that may influence the design of the park and recommend changes necessary to comply with documents. 2. FEMA floodplain maps and data 3. Carbon sequestering restoration plan developed with the Carbon Cycle Institute and the Mendocino RCD. 4. Previous phase evaluations and construction documents. 5. Goals and requirements of the Project in relation to the California Urban Rivers Grant Program. C. Visit site and analyze existing site features, relationships to surrounding environment and outline element features relevant to proposed project design. D. Provide photo documentation of analysis. E. Provide summary of analysis for project records and City review. 1.5 Utility Notifications and Applications A. Prepare and transmit project notification to utilities with a request to identify existing facilities. B. Review existing utility maps and perform utility coordination, identify and submit applications for points of connections and service upgrades, and obtain clearances. Task 2 — Design Development and Final Master Plan 2.1 Basis of Design Plan ESA will participate in development of the project design, specifically as IT relates to hydrologic, flood attenuation, water quality, and ecological criteria and design elements. ESA will conduct the following studies to inform design development and will prepare a Basis of Design (BoD) technical memorandum that will describe the scientific approach to design of these project elements. A. Hydrologic Analysis ESA will prepare a hydrologic analysis of the site and develop a wetland water balance to be used to inform restoration design. The water balance will include analysis of precipitation, evapotranspiration, storm water runoff, and groundwater influence (assuming data is available). The analysis will examine the interaction between the project site and the Russian River and include methods for improving flood drainage. The analysis will also support sizing for the storm water treatment elements of the site improvements. B. Wetland Delineation ESA will prepare a wetland delineation according to the Arid West Regional Supplement to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation guidance. Using sub -meter -accuracy GPS, ESA wetland ecologists will survey the project site and map potentially jurisdictional wetlands and waters and compile a jurisdictional wetlands delineation map and delineation report following the USACE's delineation guidelines. At the same time, ESA will compile a map indicating the assumed limits of waters of the State subject to North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) authority under Clean Water Act Section 401 and the Porter -Cologne Water Pollution Control Act, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife regulation pursuant to Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. A delineation report with mapping and supporting information will be prepared suitable for submittal for USACE verification, and to support regulatory permitting if necessary. C. Habitat Assessment A Habitat Assessment serves two main purposes: first, it facilitates the characterization and analysis of biological/ecological data to inform project design development; secondly, it serves as a direct input to any required permits for the restoration project. The Habitat Assessment will 1.5;1 MDG MELTONDE SIGNGPOUP ... 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM describe the distribution of existing aquatic, wetland and terrestrial habitat types, potential sensitive species considerations, and evaluation of existing habitat to define project ecological opportunities and constraints within the project boundary. It will also describe biological and ecological threats to the system, such as invasive/non-native plants and invertebrates. Literature search Prior to conducting field studies, ESA biologists will perform a background search and literature review of all existing data pertaining to biological resources within the area including the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), available CEQA documents, biological technical reports, local, state, and federal databases, herbaria records, maps, and photographs. A review of available documentation, to generate a list of special -status species and habitats known from the project region and with potential to occur within the project area, will be conducted. The documentation will include but is not limited to the: (1) CNDDB (2) California Native Plant Society Electronic Rare Plant Inventory; (3) sensitive species or species of concern lists; (4) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Website; and (5) and other lists and publications. Site Survey ESA biologists and ecologists will conduct one (1) site survey to document existing conditions. Based on an initial review of materials and our experience with resources in the region, it is anticipated that the following special -status species, among others, will be considered for further analysis based on their potential to occur in the vicinity of the project site: foothill yellow -legged frog (Rana boylii), red -bellied newt (Taricha rivularis), and western pond turtle (Emys marmorata). A single day for a reconnaissance site visit has been budgeted to survey the study area for habitats present on site. Biologists will determine what, if any, special -status plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitats known from the region (and documented during the background literature search) have the potential to occur on the project site. Biologists will document all species and habitats observed within the study area. Sensitive or special -status biological resources include: (1) special -status plant and wildlife species (including rare, threatened, endangered, Migratory Bird Treaty Act species, or unique species); (2) wetland/riparian habitats; (3) sensitive plant communities; and (4) other environmentally sensitive habitat areas. This survey does not include protocol -level botanical surveys to verify presence of special status plants, nor does it include protocol -level surveys to verify presence of any special status species. Technical Report Upon completion of our fieldwork, ESA will prepare a memorandum documenting results of the literature search and site survey. The report will discuss (1) methodologies used for background literature search, biological reconnaissance, and report; (2) results of the background literature search and field reconnaissance; (3) existing biological conditions including plant communities and adjacent land uses; (4) the location, extent, and habitat requirements of any sensitive or special - status biological resources, or wetlands that occur, or will likely occur, on or adjacent to the study area; (5) maps of sensitive or special -status biological resources in the study area, including vegetation types and their acreages, within the study area. C. Basis of Design Technical Memorandum ESA will prepare a Basis of Design Technical Memorandum (BoD) for the restoration project using the information developed under Tasks 2.1. The BoD will include a summary of hydrologic and ecological opportunities and constraints and resulting recommendations for ecological, storm water treatment, and flood attenuation design elements, design rationale and criteria, as well as figures displaying Project design elements. The BoD will document decisions made that affected design, including any permit conditions. Drawings needed to show grading and other Project design elements will be included in 1 1"x17" format. This memorandum will be sent to the City for review and comment prior to being finalized and will be used as a basis for developing the Master Plan and final design drawings and specifications. MDG MELTON 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM Task 2.1 Assumptions • No federal or state -listed species have potential to occur in the project area and take of special status species can be avoided during project construction. No take coverage would be required. • The project will not result in a net loss of sensitive habitats such that compensatory mitigation would be required. • This scope of work does not include CEQA compliance support. However, ESA can provide CEQA compliance services if requested. • This scope does not include support to coordinate with the USACE to review and verify the wetlands delineation survey and mapping. • This scope does not include protocol -level botanical surveys to verify presence of special status plants, nor does it include protocol -level surveys to verify presence of any special status species. • The project will not include direct impacts to the Russian River channel or riparian corridor immediately adjacent to the river. 2.2 Preliminary Master Plan (hand drawn) according to results of the Site Analysis, the Basis of Design Plan and input from City staff. MDG will prepare a master plan, perspective renderings and vignettes for key site elements. Production will include coordination with City Staff and design team to review the concept design and provide input. A. Description of park elements and materials B. Plan view layout of concepts with alternatives C. Preliminary plant species and D. Conceptual Drainage Plan — Review drainage patterns and general grading and drainage as part of developing existing concept for comment and discussion. E. Perspective view sketches of key elements F. Present to Staff and Team in working design sessions to guide and prioritize design. 2.3 Preliminary Cost Estimate — Research and provide estimated cost of construction. A. Coordinate with local contractors to determine "specific area costs" B. Work with Vendors to provide latest play equipment available to us. C. Provide costs for the "HIGH end and the LOW end" of the projects elements. D. Review cost with City staff and adjust project design as needed to be within budget 2.4 Stakeholder Meeting #1 A. Meetings consists of staff coordination prior to meeting, agenda submittal and presentation. Follow up will occur to clarify outcome of meeting. B. Attend and assist the City with facilitating the meeting. Inform stakeholders of project background and goals. Present the Preliminary Master Plan in digital form and hardcopy form. C. Collect and analyze input received from the meeting. Prepare a summary of the comments, noting the level of input per issue. 2.5 Master Plan Refinement Update Master Plan based on feedback received at the Stakeholder Meeting and direction provided by the City. Prepare the graphics in preparation for the Second Stakeholder Meeting. Graphics must be amended and updated to the satisfaction of the City prior to the second meeting. Submittals will be both digital and hard copies. • Conceptual Plan View and Renderings (24 x 36 and 11 x 17) • Preliminary Estimated Cost of Construction • Outline of Technical Specifications 2.6 Stakeholder Meeting #2 - Conduct a second stakeholder meeting, addressing first meeting comments and present refined Master Plan. A. Present Master Plan, communicating the design and estimated cost of construction, with the goal of gaining design input, consensus and direction for final Master Plan and approval. 2.7 Final Master Plan and Council Approval A. Update Master Plan according to input from second Stakeholder Meeting. B. Present updated Master Plan to City Council. C. Update Master Plan per Council input as Final Master Plan. This document will serve as base document for construction document production. MDG MELTONJESlGNGROUP 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM D. Provide the City with digital and hard copies of Master Plan E. Acquire approval from City staff to move forward with Construction Documents. Task 3 — Construction Documents Prepare drawings and specifications which will include all necessary construction and phasing direction to build the park per Council approved Master Plan and available City budget. 3.1 Construction Drawings and Specifications A. Title Sheet — Drawing index, project location maps, contacts, permits and general notes B. Existing Conditions Plan - project site plan excluding any demolition or other improvements and identifies key elements at the existing site. This plan will include site topography. C. Demolition Plan D. Erosion Control Plan E. Construction Plan • Identify all park elements and locations • Describe materials, size, color and finish • Layout and dimension park element details only. Site layout will be provided as points file to the Contractor at time of construction. F. Grading and Drainage Plan — spot elevations and contours for new grades shown over existing topography. G. Construction Details - Typical Details include: • Park access — parking lot expansion and school bus drop off area. • Perimeter and wetland area fence • Decomposed Granite Paths • Concrete flat work • Culvert outfall and headwall Planting Plan and Installation Details Irrigation Plan and Installation Details Technical Specifications - CSI Division 1 through 16 as needed according to project elements, development standards and City standard specifications. H. J. • Site furniture — benches, waste receptacles • Overlook slope protection • Information kiosk and interpretive panels 3.2 Permit Applications A. B. C. City of Ukiah Building Permit • County of Mendocino Building Permit County of Mendocino Flood Hazard Zone Development Permit The Riverside Park Regeneration project will include modifications within a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and will require compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Because this project will remove debris and balance cut and fill on site, we anticipate a "No -Rise" certification will suffice for NFIP compliance. ESA will coordinate with the City and County to identify the exact requirements, data, and analysis to obtain approval. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed a "No -Rise" document and supporting hydraulic analyses will be required including developing the existing and project conditions models. The "No -Rise" analysis and documentation will build off the effective FEMA model which ESA will order from FEMA. The order fee for the effective model ($393) is included in the budget. Assumptions • The design removes debris and balances cut and fill on site and will not generate an increase in the Base Flood Elevation or the floodway elevations. • Hydrology from the effective FEMA FIS will be used for NFIP compliance • ESA will utilize and update the effective FEMA HEC -RAS model. MDG MELTON ,E `:GRCUP 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM D. USACE Clean Water Act 404 Permit - Optional If jurisdictional waters of the U.S. existing on the project site will be impacted, approval under the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 will be required. This scope assumes the project qualifies for coverage under the USACE's Nationwide Permit Program, which provides streamlined CWA Section 404 approval. This scope assumes the proposed project qualifies for coverage under Nationwide Permit Number 27 (Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, and Enhancement Activities). A pre -construction notification (PCN) package will be completed and submitted along with supplemental information on the project, including a brief project description and project maps, a review of potential impacts on jurisdictional waters, and a list of impact avoidance and minimization measures that will be implemented. A cover letter summarizing the project and anticipated construction schedule will also be prepared. The PCN package will also include a copy of the jurisdictional delineation report prepared under Task 2.1, a discussion of species and habitats protected under the federal Endangered Species Act (i.e., results from Task 2.1), and a discussion of cultural and historic resources potentially protected under the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 (i.e., results from Optional Task 3.2-G). Following one round of City review and comment on the draft application package, ESA will revise and prepare a final application package for submittal to the USACE. Assumptions: • No impacts to aquatic resources under the jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would occur and a separate biological assessment report would be needed beyond the report prepared in Task 2.1. E. RWQCB 401- Optional If the project will impact waters of the State, permits from the RWQCB under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act would be required. ESA will prepare an application for Clean Water Act 401 Water Quality Certification and/or a Report of Waste Discharge for submittal to the North Coast RWQCB. The application will describe project activities, construction methods, impacts on jurisdictional waters and proposed on-site mitigation, if applicable. The application package will include the jurisdictional delineation report prepared in Task 2.1. Following one round of City review and comment on the draft application package, ESA will revise and prepare a final application package for submittal to the RWQCB. Assumptions: • The RWQCB will not require additional CEQA compliance documentation. • The City will provide any fee associated with the permit application. F. CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA) - Optional - ESA Projects that will temporarily or permanently obstruct the flow or alter the bed, channel, or bank of a river or stream must obtain a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA) from CDFW. In practice, this requirement also applies to impacts to riparian or wetland habitats adjacent to streams and rivers. If the project is determined to impacts these habitats, MDG MELTONOESIGNGROUR 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM ESA will prepare an application package for a LSAA for impacts to areas under CDFW purview. As required by CDFW, this application will include a memorandum describing the habitats present at the site and special -status species that are either known to occur, or have potential to occur within the project area. The general habitat assessment prepared in Task 2.1 will be submitted with the permit application package. The permit package will disclose impacts to state -protected species and habitats, identify minimization and mitigation measures for impacts (if necessary), and include a copy of the CEQA compliance document prepared for the project. Following one (1) round of City review and comment on the draft application package, ESA will revise and prepare a final application package for submittal to CDFW. Assumptions: • The CDFW will not require additional CEQA compliance documentation. • An incidental take permit under California Endangered Species Act Section 2081 will not be required; all species protected under CESA will be avoided. • The City will provide any fees associated with the permit application. G. Cultural Resources Assessment — Optional ESA will review cultural resources documentation previously gathered in the project study area and evaluate whether additional data gathering is necessary for compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106. This scope includes a search of records filed at the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and Office of Historic Preservation has been conducted in the past year (record searches expire after one year), and contacting the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to obtain the list of sacred lands in the project vicinity. This scope includes contacting federally -recognized tribes in Mendocino County to inform them of the project. A field survey of the study area will be conducted by a qualified archaeologist. Based on our understanding of the land use history, ESA assumes that the Area of Potential Effect (APE) can be surveyed by one archaeologist in a one -day field effort and that no cultural resources will be identified. If cultural resources are identified they will be recorded on Department of Parks and Recreation Primary Forms (Form 523). Under this scope, cultural resources will not be evaluated for potential legal significance; site evaluation can be completed under a separate scope and budget. Data and input received during the research phase will be documented in a report, which will be suitable for submittal to the USACE for compliance with NHPA Section 106. ESA assumes the project finding will be No Historic Properties Affected or No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties and a Memorandum of Agreement/Historic Properties Treatment Plan will not be required. If the finding is that of Adverse Effect to Historic Properties, additional consultation and documentation would be completed under a separate scope and budget. H. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) ESA will use the information developed under Task 2.2 to prepare a draft and final SWPPP for the Project. ESA's Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) or QSD designee will discuss any preferred best management practices (BMPs) with the City. It is ESA's experience that a MDG MELTONDES ,NGROUP 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM discussion regarding the proposed BMPs can help ensure protection of water quality while considering low-cost solutions. Using this information, ESA will prepare a Draft SWPPP in compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Construction General Permit (adopted Order 2009-0009- DWQ, as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-006-DWQ). The Draft SWPPP will be based on both Construction General Permit requirements and guidelines provided by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) to satisfy Construction General Permit requirements. The SWPPP will be designed to control construction site pollutants and their sources through the use of BMPs, and will include information needed to demonstrate compliance with Construction General Permit requirements. The SWPPP will be prepared and certified by ESA's Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). At a minimum, the SWPPP will include the following elements: • Project information; • Risk level determination (calculated from the project site's sediment risk and receiving water risk); • Identification of the potential construction site pollutant sources; • BMPs to be implemented onsite; • Responsible parties and operators; • Monitoring requirements; • Sampling requirements; • Training requirements; and • Permit Registration Documents (PRDs) including a site map. This scope of services includes submittal of the Draft SWPPP prepared by a QSD to the LRP in PDF format. Based on preliminary assessment, the project is anticipated to be a Risk Level 2. We assume one consolidated mark-up of the Draft SWPPP will be provided to ESA. ESA will make necessary changes to the SWPPP following receipt of comments on the Draft SWPPP and submit the Final SWPPP in PDF format. REQUIRED ACTIONS BEYOND THE SCOPE This scope has been prepared to include preparation of the Draft and Final SWPPP and does not include filing of Permit Registration Documents with the State Water Resources Control Board. To obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit, LRPs are required to electronically file the Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), which include a Notice of Intent, annual fee, and signed certification statement, along with the SWPPP, risk assessment, and site map. The PRDs must be submitted through the SWRCB Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS) website. Upon receipt of a complete PRD submittal, the SWRCB will process the application and assign a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) number for the project, allowing for commencement of project construction. 3.3 Cost Estimates — Adjust existing Estimated Cost of Construction as Construction Documents are approved through the Submittal Process. A. Compare project elements with available project budget B. Prepare final estimates r E S 41 MDG MELTONDESIGNGROUP 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM 3.4 Contract Documents — Incorporate Construction Drawings, Specification and Bid Form into the City boiler plate General Conditions and Contract Documents. The Bid Form will include all items from cost estimate and alternate or deductive options for bidders to provide additional services if budget allows. Provide Schedule B form for itemized pricing of elements and materials. 3.5 Submittal Process and Final Construction Documents A. Three copies of Construction Drawings and Technical Specifications will be submitted to the City for comment and approval at 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% completion. B. Each submittal will include a review meeting with the City. C. Adjust Construction Drawing PDF copy and 3 full size copies Task 4 — Bid Administration 4.1 Pre -Bid Meeting — Attend the pre-bid meeting and respond to contractor requests for clarification during the bid process. 4.2 Addendums - After a question and answer period addendums will follow as needed to complete package and clarify bid. 4.3 Award Bid — provide consultation to City in awarding contract according to bids received and contractor qualifications for the Project area. Task 5 — Construction Administration The City has not requested this Task, but it is highly recommended in order to make sure site construction is aligned with the design intent of the Landscape Architect, ESA and Construction Documents. 5.1 Pre -Construction Meeting — facilitate meeting at the City and on site. Confirm roles and Contract requirements of City, Contractor and MDG. 5.2 Submittal Review — review material submittals from Contractor to confirm materials meet the design intent of the Contract Documents. Provide direction for alternate materials if needed. 5.3 Amendments to documents — issue as needed throughout project if necessary, to incorporate changes to Construction Documents. 5.4 RFI (Reauests for Information) — respond to contractor requests 5.5 Memorandum Directives and Field Orders- provide to contractor as needed 5.6 Change Order Reauests — review and provide recommendations to City staff. Issue as needed. 5.7 Field Observations and Inspections per plans and specifications Typical observations include site visits to report layout, rough grade, concrete formwork, concrete finish, plant material, irrigation installation and finished site work. Field reports will follow eadi observation and be submitted to the Construction Manager, City and contractor with confirmation of the work or suggested remedies. 5.8 Reporting administration documents as needed to the City and Contractor. MDG MELTON 820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616 1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153 MELTONDG.COM ATTACHMENT B - CONTRACT #1819165 -ISA!. Time and Materials Estimate Riverside Pork Restoration and Regeneration Project Team Hours Per Task MDG MELTON Tas4 Des cnpbon Director II Ri deal londuape Architect Protect nager MSpecialist Irrigation SPac Ma aging Associate111 Managing Associate 11 Senior Associate li Sento, Associate I Technicians and AssociatesClerlcol Suis Totals Totals Hours 0200 Hours 5165 Haum $132 Hours 5120 Hours 0180 Hours 1170 Hours 5150 Hours $140 Hours 185 Hours 563 Hours Fees $0 1.0 PROJECT INMATION AND SITE ANALYSIS, 0 50 56 58,388 E. RWOCB 40, -(Johann, 4 5800 0 80 8 51,058 0 50 0 50 0 50 28 54,200 0 514,174 1.1 K,ck off Meeting 0 00 4 $662 6 1794 0 50 0 50 6 r $1,020 0 50 0 e SO ...... 0 10 0 50 16 52,475 00 1.2 Topographic Survey Adequacy Reriew 0 SO 2 5331 2 5265 0 50 0 50 7 0340 0 SO 4 0560 0 50 0 SO 10 01,495 10 1.3 B,. Map 0 SO 0 80 1 0132 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 SO 0 50 6 5510 0 50 7 5642 ..4 Site Anolysis 0 SO 4 1662 8 51,058 0 00 8 51,440 8 51,360 20 13,000 0 50 12 11,020 0 80 60 18,540 1.5 Utility Notifications and Applications 0 50 0 50 4 $529 2 8240 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50 4 5252 10 $1,021 20 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL MASTER PLAN -4.` 2 ' Basis of Design Plan , , e .•$89,458 A. Hydro'ogic Analysis 0 00 0 $0 0 50 0 00 0 00 20 53,400 0 50 0 50 40 03,400 0 50 60 $6,800 B. Wetland De ineation 2 5331 0 50 0 SO 0 50 0 50 6 51,020 48 57,200 0 50 20 11,700 0 50 76 510,251 C. Habitat Assessment 8 51,323 0 50 4 5529 0 50 4 0720 0 50 60 09,000 0 $0 8 5680 0 $0 84 112,252 D.80115 of Design Technical Memo 0 10 0 SO 0 SO 0 50 44 07,920 32 $5,440 20 53,000 0 00 0 50 0 S0 96 516,360 2.2 Preliminary Master Plan 0 50 12 01,985 24 53,175 8 1960 12 12,160 16 02,720 0 50 0 50 60 05,100 2 5126 134 116,226 2.3 Pne1,...,0 Cop Estimate 0 SO 2 0331 6 5794 3 0360 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 $O 12 51,020 0 SO 23 12,505 2.4 Stakeholder Meeting 01 0 50 7 51,158 10 51,323 0 50 0 $0 0 10 0 50 0 SO 12 01,020 0 SO 29 53,501 2.5 Master Plan Refinement 0 50 10 $1,654 18 52,381 0 50 8 51,440 8 81,360 0 SO 0 50 30 02,550 0 50 74 09,385 2.6 Stakeholder Meeting 02 0 50 8 51,323 10 01,323 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 00 0 $0 8 5680 0 SO 26 03,326 2.7 find, Moiler Plan and Council Approval 0 50 12 51,985 18 52,381 2 1240 4 0720 4 5680 0 00 0 50 32 52,720 2 5126 74 $8,852 3.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS $85,293 3.1 Construction Drawings and Specification 0 00 24 53,970 64 58,467 32 53,840 20 $3,600 20 13,400 0 SO 0 10 182 $15,470 8 ` $504 350 139,251 3.2 Po, Tit App''kotions - see below for Optional Permits D through G 0 $0 0 00 4 5529 0 $0 0 50 40 56,800 0 $0 0, SO 0 00 0 00 44 87,329 A. C9y of Ukiah 84,.din9 Penni, 0 50 0 50 4 0520 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 00 0 50 8 5680 0 50 12 11,209 B. County of Mendocino Building Permit 0 $0 0 50 4 5529 0 00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 8 5680 0 SO 12 51,209 C. Courcy of Mendocino Flood Husord Zone Development Permit 8 51,323 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 SO 0 50 80 SI 1,200 0 S0 0 SO 88 512,523 H. Storm Water Poilurlon Preventive Pion ISWPPPI 0 50 0 50 0 5O 0 50 0 50 8 $1,360 0 50 40 55,600 0 10 0 SO 48 56,960 3.3 Cop Estimates 0 50 4 5662 8 51,058 3 $360 12 52,160 12 52,040 0 50 0 50 36 03,060 0 50 75 59,340 3.4 Contract Document, 0 50 1 5165 6 5794 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 $0 0 50 20 51,700 0 SO 27 52,659 3.5 Submittal Press and Knal Construction Documents 0 50 4 5662 16 52,117 0 50 0 50 0 $0 0 $0 0 50 18 51,530 8 5504 46 54,812 4.0 MD ADMINISTRATION 6- -4w 1 54.791 4.1 Respond to Bidder Questions 0 f0 2 5331 4 5529 0 SO 0 50 0 50 0 SO 0 50 4 5340 0 SO 10 51,200 4.2 Pre.Bid Meeting 0 f0 4 5662 4 5579 0 50 0 50 0 SO 0 50 0 50 0 SO 0 50 8 51,191 4.3 Addenda 0 50 2 5331 4 5529 0 SO 0 50 0 10 0 50 0 50 4 0340 0 SO 10 11,200 4 4 Bid Review and Evaluation 0 50 2 0331 4 0529 0 $0 0 50 0 10 0 00 0 50 4 5340 0 00 10 51,200 TOTALS 18 $2,977 104 517,202 233 130,826 50 86,000, 112 520,160' 192 030,940 148 522,200 124 517,360 524 $44,540 24 51,512 1519 $193,717 SUBTOTAL 5193,717 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 59,686 TOTAL FEE PROPOSAL (EXCLUDING OPTIONAL TASKS) 1203,403 3.2 OPTIONAL PERMIT TASKS 527,840 O. USACE 404. Opnono 4 v 5800 0 50 12 51,593 0 50 0 $0 0 SD 40 56,000 0 $0 0 SO 0 50 56 58,388 E. RWOCB 40, -(Johann, 4 5800 0 80 8 51,058 0 50 0 50 0 50 28 54,200 0 SO 0 SO 0 50 40 56,058 =. CDFW 1600 - Gonion.;'. 4 5800 0 50 4 5529 0 50 0 S0 0 SO 28 $4,300 0 00 0 SO 0 SO 36 55,529 r. Cultural Resource. Repot• - Option°,, 4 5800 0 SO 2 5205 0 50 0 50 40 56,600 0 50 0 10 0 50 0 50 46 57,865 MELTONDESIGN:.'+.��u�`•. 2019 SCHEDULE OF RATES MDG PERSONNEL Principal Landscape Architect Associate Landscape Architect Project Manager GIS Specialist Irrigation Specialist Irrigation Associate Graphic Designer Drafting Technician I Drafting Technician 8 Administration REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $165.40/hour $143.30/hour $132.30/ hour $110.25/hour $121.30/ hour $ 77.20/ hour $103.95/ hour $ 85.00/ hour $ 73.50/ hour $ 63.00/ hour Black and White Plan Print $ .85 / square foot Color Plan Print $ 4.45 / square foot Premium Color Glossy Plan Print $ 6.60 / square foot Foam Core $12.10 each B & W Copies, 8.5 X 11 $ .28 each B & W Copies, 11 X 17 $ .50 each Color Copies 8.5 x 11 $ 1.25 each Color Copies 11 X 17 $ 2.30 each Binding Covers 8.5 x 11 $ 2.80 each Binding Covers 11 x 17 $ 5.60 each Flash Drive $ 7.75 each Overnight Mail Cost Plus 15% Courier Cost Plus 15% Photography Cost Plus 15% Soils Analysis Cost Plus 15% Travel / Automobile IRS 2019 RATE / mile . Rates subject to change after one year of proposal MDQ 820 BROADWAY 50 CNICO CA 95928 - 570.899.1616 1970 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.756.2157 MELTONOG.COM