HomeMy WebLinkAboutMelton Design Group, Inc. 2019-02-13COU No.1819165
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
This Agreement, made and entered into this 13th day of Februav, 2019 ("Effective Date"), by
and between CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Melton Design
Group, a corporation, organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of California,
hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
RECITALS
This Agreement is predicated on the following facts:
a. City requires consulting services related to landscape architect services for Riverside Park
Regeneration Project.
b. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, skills, experience and properly licensed to
provide these services, and is willing to provide them according to the terms of this
Agreement.
c. City and Consultant agree upon the Scope -of -Work and Work Schedule attached hereto as
Attachment "A", describing contract provisions for the project and setting forth the completion
dates for the various services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement.
TERMS OF AGREEMENT
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
1.1 The Project is described in detail in the attached Scope -of -Work (Attachment "A").
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.1 As set forth in Attachment "A".
2.2. Additional Services. Additional services, if any, shall only proceed upon written agreement
between City and Consultant. The written Agreement shall be in the form of an Amendment to
this Agreement.
3.0 CONDUCT OF WORK
3.1 Time of Completion. Consultant shall commence performance of services as required by the
Scope -of -Work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete such services
within seven months from receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall complete the
work to the City's reasonable satisfaction, even if contract disputes arise or Consultant
contends it is entitled to further compensation.
4.0 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
4.1 Basis for Compensation. For the performance of the professional services of this Agreement,
Consultant shall be compensated on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed
maximum dollar amount of $231,243. Labor charges shall be based upon hourly billing rates
for the various classifications of personnel employed by Consultant to perform the Scope of
Work as set forth in the attached Attachment B, which shall include all indirect costs and
expenses of every kind or nature, except direct expenses. The direct expenses and the fees
to be charged for same shall be as set forth in Attachment B. Consultant shall complete the
Scope of Work for the not -to -exceed guaranteed maximum, even if actual time and expenses
exceed that amount.
4.2 Changes. Should changes in compensation be required because of changes to the Scope -of -
Work of this Agreement, the parties shall agree in writing to any changes in compensation.
"Changes to the Scope -of -Work" means different activities than those described in Attachment
"A" and not additional time to complete those activities than the parties anticipated on the date
they entered this Agreement.
4.3 Sub -contractor Payment. The use of sub -consultants or other services to perform a portion of
the work of this Agreement shall be approved by City prior to commencement of work. The
cost of sub -consultants shall be included within guaranteed not -to -exceed amount set forth in
Section 4.1.
4.4 Terms of Payment. Payment to Consultant for services rendered in accordance with this
contract shall be based upon submission of monthly invoices for the work satisfactorily
performed prior to the date of invoice less any amount already paid to Consultant, which
amounts shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after receipt by City. The invoices shall
provide a description of each item of work performed, the time expended to perform each task,
the fees charged for that task, and the direct expenses incurred and billed for. Invoices shall
be accompanied by documentation sufficient to enable City to determine progress made and
the expenses claimed.
5.0 ASSURANCES OF CONSULTANT
5.1 Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely responsible for
its acts or omissions. Consultant (including its agents, servants, and employees) is not City's
agent, employee, or representative for any purpose.
It is the express intention of the parties hereto that Consultant is an independent contractor
and not an employee, joint venturer, or partner of City for any purpose whatsoever. City shall
have no right to, and shall not control the manner or prescribe the method of accomplishing
those services contracted to and performed by Consultant under this Agreement, and the
general public and all governmental agencies regulating such activity shall be so informed.
Those provisions of this Agreement that reserve ultimate authority in City have been inserted
solely to achieve compliance with federal and state laws, rules, regulations, and interpretations
thereof. No such provisions and no other provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted or
construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between
Consultant and City.
Consultant shall pay all estimated and actual federal and state income and self-employment
taxes that are due the state and federal government and shall furnish and pay worker's
compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and any other benefits required by law for
himself and his employees, if any. Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold City and its
officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any claims or demands by federal,
state or local government agencies for any such taxes or benefits due but not paid by
Consultant, including the legal costs associated with defending against any audit, claim,
demand or law suit.
Consultant warrants and represents that it is a properly licensed professional or professional
organization with a substantial investment in its business and that it maintains its own offices
and staff which it will use in performing under this Agreement.
PAGE 2 OF 7
5.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibility is solely to City.
Consultant has no interest and will not acquire any direct or indirect interest that would conflict
with its performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall not in the performance of this
Agreement employ a person having such an interest. If the City Manager determines that the
Consultant has a disclosure obligation under the City's local conflict of interest code, the
Consultant shall file the required disclosure form with the City Clerk within 10 days of being
notified of the City Manager's determination.
6.0 INDEMNIFICATION
6.1 Insurance Liability. Without limiting Consultant's obligations arising under Paragraph 6.2
Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it procures and maintains for the
full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement insurance
against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in
connection with its performance under this Agreement.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office ("ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form
No. CG 20 10 10 01 and Commercial General Liability Coverage — Completed
Operations Form No. CG 20 37 10 01.
2. ISO Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 "any
auto" or Code 8, 9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025.
3. Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State
of California and Employers Liability Insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession. Architects' and engineers' coverage is to be endorsed to include
contractual liability.
B. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage including operations, products and
completed operations. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form
with a general aggregate limit is used, the general aggregate limit shall apply
separately to the work performed under this Agreement, or the aggregate limit
shall be twice the prescribed per occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
3. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker's compensation limits
as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability
limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
PAGE 3 OF 7
4. Errors and Omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the
City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such
deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
D. Other Insurance Provisions
The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages
a. The City, it officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as additional insureds as respects; liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products and
completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or
used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, hired or borrowed by the
Consultant for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the
termination of this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope -of -protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
b. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as
respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers.
Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
d. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
2. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage
The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from Consultant's
performance of the work, pursuant to this Agreement.
3. Professional Liability Coverage
If written on a claims -made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the effective
date of this Agreement. The policy period shall extend one year from
submission of final invoice for this project.
PAGE 4 OF 7
4. All Coverages
Each Insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
E. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with admitted California insurers with an A.M. Bests rating of
no less than A- for financial strength, AA for long-term credit rating and AMB -1 for
short-term credit rating.
F. Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with Certificates of Insurance and with original
Endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates and
Endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by
that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The Certificates and Endorsements are to
be on forms provided or approved by the City. All Certificates and Endorsements are
to be received and approved by the City before Consultant begins the work of this
Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all
required insurance policies, at any time. If Consultant fails to provide the coverages
required herein, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or
all of them. In that event, after notice to Consultant that City has paid the premium, the
cost of insurance may be deducted from the compensation otherwise due the
contractor under the terms of this Contract.
G. Subcontractors
Consultant shall include all sub -contractors or sub -consultants as insured under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each sub -contractor
or sub -consultant. All coverage for sub -contractors or sub -consultants shall be subject
to all insurance requirements set forth in this Paragraph 6.1.
6.2 Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition
thereto, Consultant agrees, for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination
of this Agreement, to indemnify the City for any claim, cost or liability that arises out of, or
pertains to, or relates to any negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of Consultant
and its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not
apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other
loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by the City, or
arising from the active negligence of the City.
"Indemnify," as used herein includes the expenses of defending against a claim and the
payment of any settlement or judgment arising out of the claim. Defense costs include all
costs associated with defending the claim, including, but not limited to, the fees of attorneys,
investigators, consultants, experts and expert witnesses, and litigation expenses.
References in this paragraph to City or Consultant, include their officers, employees, agents,
and subcontractors.
PAGE 5 OF 7
7.0 CONTRACT PROVISIONS
7.1 Documents and Ownership of Work. All documents furnished to Consultant by City and all
documents or reports and supportive data prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are
owned and become the property of the City upon their creation and shall be given to City
immediately upon demand and at the completion of Consultants services at no additional cost
to City. Deliverables are identified in the Scope -of -Work, Attachment A. All documents
produced by Consultant shall be furnished to City in digital format and hardcopy. Consultant
shall produce the digital format, using software and media approved by City.
7.2 Governing Law. Consultant shall comply with the laws and regulations of the United States,
the State of California, and all local governments having jurisdiction over this Agreement. The
interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by California law and any
action arising under or in connection with this Agreement must be filed in a Court of competent
jurisdiction in Mendocino County.
7.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement plus its Attachment(s) and executed Amendments set
forth the entire understanding between the parties.
7.4 Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect.
7.5 Modification. No modification of this Agreement is valid unless made with the agreement of
both parties in writing.
7.6 Assignment. Consultant's services are considered unique and personal. Consultant shall not
assign, transfer, or sub -contract its interest or obligation under all or any portion of this
Agreement without City's prior written consent.
7.7 Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall be
a waiver of any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant, term or
condition or a waiver of the covenant, term or condition itself.
7.8 Termination. This Agreement may only be terminated by either party: 1) for breach of the
Agreement; 2) because funds are no longer available to pay Consultant for services provided
under this Agreement; or 3) City has abandoned and does not wish to complete the project for
which Consultant was retained. A party shall notify the other party of any alleged breach of
the Agreement and of the action required to cure the breach. If the breaching party fails to
cure the breach within the time specified in the notice, the contract shall be terminated as of
that time. If terminated for lack of funds or abandonment of the project, the contract shall
terminate on the date notice of termination is given to Consultant. City shall pay the
Consultant only for services performed and expenses incurred as of the effective termination
date. In such event, as a condition to payment, Consultant shall provide to City all finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and
reports prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be entitled to
receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder,
subject to off -set for any direct or consequential damages City may incur as a result of
Consultant's breach of contract.
7.9 Execution of Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each
bearing the original signature of the parties. Alternatively, this Agreement may be executed
and delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission, and in more than one counterpart,
each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and
PAGE 6 OF 7
the same instrument. When executed using either alternative, the executed agreement shall
be deemed an original admissible as evidence in any administrative or judicial proceeding to
prove the terms and content of this Agreement.
8.0 NOTICES
Any notice given under this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed given when personally
delivered or deposited in the mail (certified or registered) addressed to the parties as follows:
CITY OF UKIAH
DEPT. OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
300 SEMINARY AVENUE
UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 95482-5400
MELTON DESIGN GROUP, INC.
GREG MELTON, PRINCIPAL
820 BROADWAY STREET
CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95928
9.0 SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the Effective
Date: MELTON P IGN GROUP, INC.
BY:
G MELTON
81-4: 0004
IRS IDN Number
CITY OF UKIAH
BY:
A SANGIACOMO
CIT MANAGER
ATTEST
CITY CLERK
PAGE 7 OF 7
February 14, 2019
Date
Date
Date
ATTACHMENT A- CONTRACT 1819165
The restoration of Riverside Park is a wonderful opportunity for the local youth and residents of Ukiah to
experience the great outdoors as it is intertwined within edge of Ukiah, Little League Fields, BMX and the
Russian River. Congratulations to the advocates that worked diligently to improve this riparian habitat and
to the City in its award of the California Urban Rivers Grant. The site is indeed a fitting location for this
purpose. We understand the goals of the City for the Project, the associated grant requirements and with
similar project experience, know how to clean up the site and create a floodplain and wetland complex that
will further bio -filtration and properly drain the site.
The team to complete this important first stage of restoration is one of the most significant factors to consider
in the approach to completing the Project. The Team of MDG, ESA and River Partners will provide the City
of Ukiah with the range of experience necessary to restore this section of Riverside Park to a functioning
ecosystem with educational opportunities through recreation.
ESA
4
MDG
M ELTOND ES 1GNGPOUP
MDG has work with ESA since 2003 and River Partners since it was formed in 1998. This team of recreation
and restoration design specialists have proven to be successful in creating natural environments for the public
to enjoy. Recent examples include the restoration of the 210 -acre Riverbend Park along the Feather River
in Oroville and the Feather River Conceptual Plan. Both projects involved the design of recreational open
space along a large river, habitat restoration and interpretive education. An MDG lead carbon
sequestration plan is also underway for Riverbend Park with the installation of biochar in a 10 -acre
restoration area, plans for another 8 acres this spring and a monitoring system.
Feather River
A VISION FOR THE LOW -FLOW CHANNEL OF THE FEATHER RIVER"
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA
urneeotcr ama,n t,
q
Supplemental Benefits Fund Seerng Cormnnee r TGA 6 monmental Seance Associates
Final Plan /\ 1735 Mw190,.ySheet �7t1 Ganda Arae
Suns 203
Unna s, Calicoes 95316
September 5, 2018c°r ,;Galeern,lessrndc„a,nan,s&.t
M•Non Damp Gaup
309 Well Sine,
dtieo, Whom* 951R6
MOW melMdg.com
r Ii'A
MDG
MELTONDESIGNGROUP„
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 — 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 — 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
RESTORATION DESIGN APPROACH
Our goal is to assist the City with transforming the highly disturbed and degraded portions of Riverside Park
into an ecologically rich corridor of wet meadows, floodplain wetlands, and spring pools, that form a central
thread of the park visitor's experience. Our approach will center on understanding the hydrologic and
hydraulic processes that influence Riverside Park and using this understanding to develop a technical basis
of design for the habitat restoration. The hydrologic analysis will examine the sources influencing the site,
including precipitation, evapotranspiration, surface water runoff from adjacent lands and the City's storm
drainage system, groundwater, and periodic flooding from the Russian River. The hydraulic analysis will be
used to inform the project design to reduce potential for erosion and fish entrapment and to ensure there
are no increased flooding impacts from the project.
Based on our field visit to the site and our understanding of the project's multi -benefit objectives to; restore
habitat, improve flooding and storm water drainage, improve groundwater recharge and water quality,
and provide an enhanced park experience; our approach to the Riverside Park Regeneration is to create a
shallow open depression that drains to the Russian River through a broad swale. This configuration will allow
the site to capture storm water runoff, while visually opening area to improve park safety and comfort.
Shallow seasonal wetlands will be created within the depression and will provide habitat and improve water
quality. The site would be graded to create low gradient ecotone slopes ideal for creating a broad variety
of conditions for native vegetation. Creating seasonal wetlands will provide water quality improvement
through capture and treatment during the wet winter season, but will remain dry during the summer season,
to the benefit of the water management of the adjacent vineyards. The swale will provide access to refuge
for fish and improve drainage on the receding limb of the Russian River. The proposed depression, seasonal
wetland and swale approach also is well suited for linking to potential future projects such as fish habitat
restoration along the Russian River or improved storm drainage from the adjacent ball parks and BMX park.
The image below illustrates this approach and includes a preliminary idea of site circulation and interpretive
opportunism.
xPo pP4-4lw4
TO • 1 C2.-) it poi-
c3,A'- s
1
S-'rbr- on o rv.l j
acrj' Ft. ou' .
FC.Ox.3.S
•
VIP- - i 4 WSJ 4012M
"-NM) FLtX-Brllo^JI
}"-.lccgK
• W C-'i1.4"1•JP5
Lcwf4 6
hkv F '
FL.O.6.5-
ar-10 c' E
. FISH
• 4A.0;
d6t:0 f lG c-
112
5ua> a ac. fcow c„'T r
vE-g- Amp GJEFuLC
Fc -. p•s14curlw.1-tl4,41
F{.o iJ S
,\ 11
- 5+,'M•E' T 3
/� Drs,lw•1.., �2iwo2AOn-
�./ �'�b..a� 61F V'I"
t.civE.p. i ea lug
Tt-'-iL_'Tv A-t4.ow p514
%AND W, --b12- t.,:Dw
MDG
MELTON--- ".G
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 9581 1 - 916.754.21 53
MELTONDG.COM
NATURE EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES
It is unique to find such a preserve next to an urban environment and
such is the case that this site is very well suited to show visitors how
nature can be found in an urban environment and how restoration
projects can improve habitat along riparian corridors.
Along with the proposed floodplain and wetland demonstration
areas, the existing wildlife and riparian corridor, there are numerous
opportunities to explain how important ecosystems are to each other
and how they work together.
By incorporating interactive educational exhibits, we can create a
story line to lead visitors from one exhibit to the next, making the
experience an adventure that they will not forget. MDG is excited to
provide this approach in joint venture with the Environmental Science
Associates (ESA) and River Partners.
QUALITY IN DESIGN
In creating exhibits and restoring native habitat, special attention must be paid to the quality of design. In
this sense, quality means an experienced design team that can deliver project elements that will be durable
and sustainable and especially in the case of interactive exhibits; attractive, fun and innovative.
NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION
Recreating native habitat can often be a difficult process, especially when working with slow growing oak
tree seedlings in a hot summer climate. MDG is well versed in the design of native habitats for restoration.
One element often overlooked is to design for a complete habitat, by creating an environment (canopy,
understory and grasslands) that will function as one with the attraction of native support plant species and
wildlife.
GRANT REQUIREMENTS
An especially important goal for the restoration of Riverside Park is to abide by the directives established
in the California Urban Rivers Grant Program. MDG services include a successful history of grant writing
and most of our open space design projects are grant funded. Our design team is very familiar with the
guidelines established by the Grant Program and will work diligently with the City to ensure the Grant
requirements are met.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
Cleaning up the site, improving bio -filtration and restoring riparian habitat will all help to remove carbon
dioxide from the air. Another way to help is by utilizing soil amendments like Biochar. Biochar is charcoal
used as a soil amendment. It's a stable solid, rich in carbon, and can endure in soil for thousands of years.
This 2,000 -year-old practice converts agricultural waste into a soil enhancer that can hold carbon and
increase soil biodiversity.
5X water storage in volume reducing irrigation needs and improving bio -filtration
Capture 3x it's volume in VOC's — phosphates, nitrates, methane
Reducing fossil -fuel based fertilizers, enhancing cation exchange capacity increasing
mycorrhizal development in soils
Primarily used in agriculture, gold course managers have recently incorporated the amendment in the
maintenance of their courses and MDG is now pioneering the use of Biochar in city parks and habitat
restoration. Riverbend Park in Oroville, CA is a recent example as the amendment has been incorporated
MDG
MELTONPEP
GROUP
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
in both the active sports field areas of the Park and in native plant restoration. See the illustration below
for an idea of the application to the Riverbend Park soccer fields along the Feather River.
r FORCE or 44
Et 1Ote.:14ii'41?►lt
1.":1' lair; VP
.
5X WATER STORAGE
IN VOLUME
• REDUCE IRRIGATION
• REDUCE PUMP COSTS
• REDUCE RUNOFF
BIOMASS DISPLACED
• 500 JEFFER0 PINES
• ELIMINATE ORGANIC MATTER USE
CAPTURED VOC'S
r`•L�Y1 3X ITS VOLUME
• PHOSPHATES
• NITRATES
• METHANE
• CAPTURED CO2
• ATMOSPHERIC CARBON CAPTWE
THROUGH PHOTOSYNTHESIS
REDUCTION IN FERTILIZER
• ENHANCED MYCORRHIZAL DEVELOPMENT
• ENHANCED CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY
• REDUCED LEACHING OF BENEFICIAL NUTRIENTS
C4t:i
Lira PtIV >occ r
v ses oKts C E1VNspiv
TRAILS/
PICNIC
FIRST
CARBON
NEGATIVE
SOCCER PARK
IN THE
NATION!
ADVENTURE PAINT
ACH AREA
RIVERBENI Water ront
NORTH SOCCER PARK - OROVILLE, CA -'Y
Biochar opportunities at Riverside Park include Bio Char as a soil amendment and in the form of
biodegradable wattles. The wattles are like straw wattles for erosion control. They can be designed into
the landscape so that they're not visible and better help to filter out toxic elements from existing site
material and storm water.
The rest of this section is a detailed Scope of Services outlined to provide the City of Ukiah with the
services necessary to complete the Riverside Park Regeneration Project.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following is an outline of services to be
Task 1 — Project Initiation and Site Analysis
1.1 Kick off Meeting — Meet with City Staff to confirm the City's objectives and program for the
project, to establish parameters for the design effort, and to confirm interim and final deliverables.
A. Review Project Team Coordination for duration of Project.
B. Agree upon project schedule
C. Refine project program and confirm with City Staff input.
1.2 Topographic Survey Adequacy Review
This task includes reviewing the topographic data collected by the City to determine whether there
is adequate data for project design.
MDG
MELTONDEStGNGROUP
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
1.3 Base Map
The topography file(s) will be converted to a base map, 3-dimensional surface, and/or CAD file
consisting of "existing condition information" that will be used for hydrodynamic modeling and design
drawings.
1.4 Preliminary Site Analysis
A. Review Topographic survey relative to potential design options.
B. Obtain and review all existing site data, information from City and Stakeholder agencies,
1. Review all appropriate City and County documents that may influence the design of the
park and recommend changes necessary to comply with documents.
2. FEMA floodplain maps and data
3. Carbon sequestering restoration plan developed with the Carbon Cycle Institute and the
Mendocino RCD.
4. Previous phase evaluations and construction documents.
5. Goals and requirements of the Project in relation to the California Urban Rivers Grant
Program.
C. Visit site and analyze existing site features, relationships to surrounding environment and outline
element features relevant to proposed project design.
D. Provide photo documentation of analysis.
E. Provide summary of analysis for project records and City review.
1.5 Utility Notifications and Applications
A. Prepare and transmit project notification to utilities with a request to identify existing facilities.
B. Review existing utility maps and perform utility coordination, identify and submit applications
for points of connections and service upgrades, and obtain clearances.
Task 2 — Design Development and Final Master Plan
2.1 Basis of Design Plan
ESA will participate in development of the project design, specifically as IT relates to hydrologic,
flood attenuation, water quality, and ecological criteria and design elements. ESA will conduct the
following studies to inform design development and will prepare a Basis of Design (BoD) technical
memorandum that will describe the scientific approach to design of these project elements.
A. Hydrologic Analysis
ESA will prepare a hydrologic analysis of the site and develop a wetland water balance to be
used to inform restoration design. The water balance will include analysis of precipitation,
evapotranspiration, storm water runoff, and groundwater influence (assuming data is available).
The analysis will examine the interaction between the project site and the Russian River and include
methods for improving flood drainage. The analysis will also support sizing for the storm water
treatment elements of the site improvements.
B. Wetland Delineation
ESA will prepare a wetland delineation according to the Arid West Regional Supplement to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation guidance. Using sub -meter -accuracy
GPS, ESA wetland ecologists will survey the project site and map potentially jurisdictional wetlands
and waters and compile a jurisdictional wetlands delineation map and delineation report
following the USACE's delineation guidelines. At the same time, ESA will compile a map indicating
the assumed limits of waters of the State subject to North Coast Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB) authority under Clean Water Act Section 401 and the Porter -Cologne Water
Pollution Control Act, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife regulation pursuant to
Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. A delineation report with mapping and
supporting information will be prepared suitable for submittal for USACE verification, and to
support regulatory permitting if necessary.
C. Habitat Assessment
A Habitat Assessment serves two main purposes: first, it facilitates the characterization and
analysis of biological/ecological data to inform project design development; secondly, it serves as
a direct input to any required permits for the restoration project. The Habitat Assessment will
1.5;1
MDG
MELTONDE SIGNGPOUP ...
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
describe the distribution of existing aquatic, wetland and terrestrial habitat types, potential
sensitive species considerations, and evaluation of existing habitat to define project ecological
opportunities and constraints within the project boundary. It will also describe biological and
ecological threats to the system, such as invasive/non-native plants and invertebrates.
Literature search
Prior to conducting field studies, ESA biologists will perform a background search and literature
review of all existing data pertaining to biological resources within the area including the
California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), available CEQA documents, biological technical
reports, local, state, and federal databases, herbaria records, maps, and photographs. A review
of available documentation, to generate a list of special -status species and habitats known from
the project region and with potential to occur within the project area, will be conducted. The
documentation will include but is not limited to the: (1) CNDDB (2) California Native Plant Society
Electronic Rare Plant Inventory; (3) sensitive species or species of concern lists; (4) U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Website; and (5) and other lists and publications.
Site Survey
ESA biologists and ecologists will conduct one (1) site survey to document existing conditions. Based
on an initial review of materials and our experience with resources in the region, it is anticipated
that the following special -status species, among others, will be considered for further analysis
based on their potential to occur in the vicinity of the project site: foothill yellow -legged frog (Rana
boylii), red -bellied newt (Taricha rivularis), and western pond turtle (Emys marmorata).
A single day for a reconnaissance site visit has been budgeted to survey the study area for
habitats present on site. Biologists will determine what, if any, special -status plant and wildlife
species and sensitive habitats known from the region (and documented during the background
literature search) have the potential to occur on the project site. Biologists will document all species
and habitats observed within the study area. Sensitive or special -status biological resources
include: (1) special -status plant and wildlife species (including rare, threatened, endangered,
Migratory Bird Treaty Act species, or unique species); (2) wetland/riparian habitats; (3) sensitive
plant communities; and (4) other environmentally sensitive habitat areas. This survey does not
include protocol -level botanical surveys to verify presence of special status plants, nor does it
include protocol -level surveys to verify presence of any special status species.
Technical Report
Upon completion of our fieldwork, ESA will prepare a memorandum documenting results of the
literature search and site survey. The report will discuss (1) methodologies used for background
literature search, biological reconnaissance, and report; (2) results of the background literature
search and field reconnaissance; (3) existing biological conditions including plant communities and
adjacent land uses; (4) the location, extent, and habitat requirements of any sensitive or special -
status biological resources, or wetlands that occur, or will likely occur, on or adjacent to the study
area; (5) maps of sensitive or special -status biological resources in the study area, including
vegetation types and their acreages, within the study area.
C. Basis of Design Technical Memorandum
ESA will prepare a Basis of Design Technical Memorandum (BoD) for the restoration project using
the information developed under Tasks 2.1. The BoD will include a summary of hydrologic and
ecological opportunities and constraints and resulting recommendations for ecological, storm water
treatment, and flood attenuation design elements, design rationale and criteria, as well as figures
displaying Project design elements. The BoD will document decisions made that affected design,
including any permit conditions. Drawings needed to show grading and other Project design
elements will be included in 1 1"x17" format. This memorandum will be sent to the City for review
and comment prior to being finalized and will be used as a basis for developing the Master Plan
and final design drawings and specifications.
MDG
MELTON
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
Task 2.1 Assumptions
• No federal or state -listed species have potential to occur in the project area and take of special
status species can be avoided during project construction. No take coverage would be required.
• The project will not result in a net loss of sensitive habitats such that compensatory mitigation would
be required.
• This scope of work does not include CEQA compliance support. However, ESA can provide CEQA
compliance services if requested.
• This scope does not include support to coordinate with the USACE to review and verify the wetlands
delineation survey and mapping.
• This scope does not include protocol -level botanical surveys to verify presence of special status
plants, nor does it include protocol -level surveys to verify presence of any special status species.
• The project will not include direct impacts to the Russian River channel or riparian corridor
immediately adjacent to the river.
2.2 Preliminary Master Plan (hand drawn) according to results of the Site Analysis, the Basis of Design Plan
and input from City staff. MDG will prepare a master plan, perspective renderings and vignettes for
key site elements. Production will include coordination with City Staff and design team to review the
concept design and provide input.
A. Description of park elements and materials
B. Plan view layout of concepts with alternatives
C. Preliminary plant species and
D. Conceptual Drainage Plan — Review drainage patterns and general grading and drainage as
part of developing existing concept for comment and discussion.
E. Perspective view sketches of key elements
F. Present to Staff and Team in working design sessions to guide and prioritize design.
2.3 Preliminary Cost Estimate — Research and provide estimated cost of construction.
A. Coordinate with local contractors to determine "specific area costs"
B. Work with Vendors to provide latest play equipment available to us.
C. Provide costs for the "HIGH end and the LOW end" of the projects elements.
D. Review cost with City staff and adjust project design as needed to be within budget
2.4 Stakeholder Meeting #1
A. Meetings consists of staff coordination prior to meeting, agenda submittal and presentation.
Follow up will occur to clarify outcome of meeting.
B. Attend and assist the City with facilitating the meeting. Inform stakeholders of project
background and goals. Present the Preliminary Master Plan in digital form and hardcopy
form.
C. Collect and analyze input received from the meeting. Prepare a summary of the comments, noting
the level of input per issue.
2.5 Master Plan Refinement
Update Master Plan based on feedback received at the Stakeholder Meeting and direction provided
by the City. Prepare the graphics in preparation for the Second Stakeholder Meeting. Graphics must
be amended and updated to the satisfaction of the City prior to the second meeting. Submittals will
be both digital and hard copies.
• Conceptual Plan View and Renderings (24 x 36 and 11 x 17)
• Preliminary Estimated Cost of Construction
• Outline of Technical Specifications
2.6 Stakeholder Meeting #2 - Conduct a second stakeholder meeting, addressing first meeting
comments and present refined Master Plan.
A. Present Master Plan, communicating the design and estimated cost of construction, with the goal of
gaining design input, consensus and direction for final Master Plan and approval.
2.7 Final Master Plan and Council Approval
A. Update Master Plan according to input from second Stakeholder Meeting.
B. Present updated Master Plan to City Council.
C. Update Master Plan per Council input as Final Master Plan. This document will serve as base
document for construction document production.
MDG
MELTONJESlGNGROUP
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
D. Provide the City with digital and hard copies of Master Plan
E. Acquire approval from City staff to move forward with Construction Documents.
Task 3 — Construction Documents
Prepare drawings and specifications which will include all necessary construction and phasing direction to
build the park per Council approved Master Plan and available City budget.
3.1 Construction Drawings and Specifications
A. Title Sheet — Drawing index, project location maps, contacts, permits and general notes
B. Existing Conditions Plan - project site plan excluding any demolition or other improvements
and identifies key elements at the existing site. This plan will include site topography.
C. Demolition Plan
D. Erosion Control Plan
E. Construction Plan
• Identify all park elements and locations
• Describe materials, size, color and finish
• Layout and dimension park element details only. Site layout will be provided as points file to
the Contractor at time of construction.
F. Grading and Drainage Plan — spot elevations and contours for new grades shown over
existing topography.
G. Construction Details - Typical Details include:
• Park access — parking lot expansion
and school bus drop off area.
• Perimeter and wetland area fence
• Decomposed Granite Paths
• Concrete flat work
• Culvert outfall and headwall
Planting Plan and Installation Details
Irrigation Plan and Installation Details
Technical Specifications - CSI Division 1 through 16 as needed according to project elements,
development standards and City standard specifications.
H.
J.
• Site furniture — benches, waste
receptacles
• Overlook slope protection
• Information kiosk and interpretive panels
3.2 Permit Applications
A.
B.
C.
City of Ukiah Building Permit •
County of Mendocino Building Permit
County of Mendocino Flood Hazard Zone Development Permit
The Riverside Park Regeneration project will include modifications within a FEMA Special Flood
Hazard Area (SFHA) and will require compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP). Because this project will remove debris and balance cut and fill on site, we anticipate a
"No -Rise" certification will suffice for NFIP compliance. ESA will coordinate with the City and
County to identify the exact requirements, data, and analysis to obtain approval.
For budgeting purposes, we have assumed a "No -Rise" document and supporting hydraulic
analyses will be required including developing the existing and project conditions models. The
"No -Rise" analysis and documentation will build off the effective FEMA model which ESA will
order from FEMA. The order fee for the effective model ($393) is included in the budget.
Assumptions
• The design removes debris and balances cut and fill on site and will not generate an increase
in the Base Flood Elevation or the floodway elevations.
• Hydrology from the effective FEMA FIS will be used for NFIP compliance
• ESA will utilize and update the effective FEMA HEC -RAS model.
MDG
MELTON ,E `:GRCUP
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
D. USACE Clean Water Act 404 Permit - Optional
If jurisdictional waters of the U.S. existing on the project site will be impacted, approval under
the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 will be required. This scope assumes the project
qualifies for coverage under the USACE's Nationwide Permit Program, which provides
streamlined CWA Section 404 approval. This scope assumes the proposed project qualifies
for coverage under Nationwide Permit Number 27 (Aquatic Habitat Restoration,
Establishment, and Enhancement Activities). A pre -construction notification (PCN) package will
be completed and submitted along with supplemental information on the project, including a
brief project description and project maps, a review of potential impacts on jurisdictional
waters, and a list of impact avoidance and minimization measures that will be implemented. A
cover letter summarizing the project and anticipated construction schedule will also be
prepared. The PCN package will also include a copy of the jurisdictional delineation report
prepared under Task 2.1, a discussion of species and habitats protected under the federal
Endangered Species Act (i.e., results from Task 2.1), and a discussion of cultural and historic
resources potentially protected under the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 (i.e.,
results from Optional Task 3.2-G).
Following one round of City review and comment on the draft application package, ESA will
revise and prepare a final application package for submittal to the USACE.
Assumptions:
• No impacts to aquatic resources under the jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would occur and a separate biological assessment report
would be needed beyond the report prepared in Task 2.1.
E. RWQCB 401- Optional
If the project will impact waters of the State, permits from the RWQCB under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act and the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act would be required.
ESA will prepare an application for Clean Water Act 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
a Report of Waste Discharge for submittal to the North Coast RWQCB. The application will
describe project activities, construction methods, impacts on jurisdictional waters and proposed
on-site mitigation, if applicable. The application package will include the jurisdictional
delineation report prepared in Task 2.1.
Following one round of City review and comment on the draft application package, ESA will
revise and prepare a final application package for submittal to the RWQCB.
Assumptions:
• The RWQCB will not require additional CEQA compliance documentation.
• The City will provide any fee associated with the permit application.
F. CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA) - Optional - ESA
Projects that will temporarily or permanently obstruct the flow or alter the bed, channel, or
bank of a river or stream must obtain a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA)
from CDFW. In practice, this requirement also applies to impacts to riparian or wetland
habitats adjacent to streams and rivers. If the project is determined to impacts these habitats,
MDG
MELTONOESIGNGROUR
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
ESA will prepare an application package for a LSAA for impacts to areas under CDFW
purview. As required by CDFW, this application will include a memorandum describing the
habitats present at the site and special -status species that are either known to occur, or have
potential to occur within the project area. The general habitat assessment prepared in Task
2.1 will be submitted with the permit application package. The permit package will disclose
impacts to state -protected species and habitats, identify minimization and mitigation measures
for impacts (if necessary), and include a copy of the CEQA compliance document prepared
for the project.
Following one (1) round of City review and comment on the draft application package, ESA
will revise and prepare a final application package for submittal to CDFW.
Assumptions:
• The CDFW will not require additional CEQA compliance documentation.
• An incidental take permit under California Endangered Species Act Section 2081 will not
be required; all species protected under CESA will be avoided.
• The City will provide any fees associated with the permit application.
G. Cultural Resources Assessment — Optional
ESA will review cultural resources documentation previously gathered in the project study area
and evaluate whether additional data gathering is necessary for compliance with the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106. This scope includes a search of records filed at
the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and Office of Historic
Preservation has been conducted in the past year (record searches expire after one year), and
contacting the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to obtain the list of sacred lands
in the project vicinity. This scope includes contacting federally -recognized tribes in Mendocino
County to inform them of the project.
A field survey of the study area will be conducted by a qualified archaeologist. Based on our
understanding of the land use history, ESA assumes that the Area of Potential Effect (APE) can
be surveyed by one archaeologist in a one -day field effort and that no cultural resources will
be identified. If cultural resources are identified they will be recorded on Department of Parks
and Recreation Primary Forms (Form 523). Under this scope, cultural resources will not be
evaluated for potential legal significance; site evaluation can be completed under a separate
scope and budget.
Data and input received during the research phase will be documented in a report, which will
be suitable for submittal to the USACE for compliance with NHPA Section 106. ESA assumes
the project finding will be No Historic Properties Affected or No Adverse Effect to Historic
Properties and a Memorandum of Agreement/Historic Properties Treatment Plan will not be
required. If the finding is that of Adverse Effect to Historic Properties, additional consultation
and documentation would be completed under a separate scope and budget.
H. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
ESA will use the information developed under Task 2.2 to prepare a draft and final SWPPP
for the Project. ESA's Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) or QSD designee will discuss any
preferred best management practices (BMPs) with the City. It is ESA's experience that a
MDG
MELTONDES ,NGROUP
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
discussion regarding the proposed BMPs can help ensure protection of water quality while
considering low-cost solutions.
Using this information, ESA will prepare a Draft SWPPP in compliance with the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Construction General Permit (adopted Order 2009-0009-
DWQ, as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-006-DWQ). The Draft SWPPP will be
based on both Construction General Permit requirements and guidelines provided by the
California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) to satisfy Construction General Permit
requirements. The SWPPP will be designed to control construction site pollutants and their
sources through the use of BMPs, and will include information needed to demonstrate
compliance with Construction General Permit requirements. The SWPPP will be prepared and
certified by ESA's Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). At a minimum, the SWPPP will include
the following elements:
• Project information;
• Risk level determination (calculated from the project site's sediment risk and receiving
water risk);
• Identification of the potential construction site pollutant sources;
• BMPs to be implemented onsite;
• Responsible parties and operators;
• Monitoring requirements;
• Sampling requirements;
• Training requirements; and
• Permit Registration Documents (PRDs) including a site map.
This scope of services includes submittal of the Draft SWPPP prepared by a QSD to the LRP in
PDF format. Based on preliminary assessment, the project is anticipated to be a Risk Level 2.
We assume one consolidated mark-up of the Draft SWPPP will be provided to ESA. ESA will
make necessary changes to the SWPPP following receipt of comments on the Draft SWPPP
and submit the Final SWPPP in PDF format.
REQUIRED ACTIONS BEYOND THE SCOPE
This scope has been prepared to include preparation of the Draft and Final SWPPP and does
not include filing of Permit Registration Documents with the State Water Resources Control
Board. To obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit, LRPs are required to
electronically file the Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), which include a Notice of Intent,
annual fee, and signed certification statement, along with the SWPPP, risk assessment, and site
map. The PRDs must be submitted through the SWRCB Stormwater Multiple Application and
Report Tracking System (SMARTS) website. Upon receipt of a complete PRD submittal, the
SWRCB will process the application and assign a Waste Discharge Identification Number
(WDID) number for the project, allowing for commencement of project construction.
3.3 Cost Estimates — Adjust existing Estimated Cost of Construction as Construction Documents are
approved through the Submittal Process.
A. Compare project elements with available project budget
B. Prepare final estimates
r E S
41
MDG
MELTONDESIGNGROUP
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
3.4 Contract Documents — Incorporate Construction Drawings, Specification and Bid Form into the City
boiler plate General Conditions and Contract Documents. The Bid Form will include all items from
cost estimate and alternate or deductive options for bidders to provide additional services if budget
allows. Provide Schedule B form for itemized pricing of elements and materials.
3.5 Submittal Process and Final Construction Documents
A. Three copies of Construction Drawings and Technical Specifications will be submitted to the
City for comment and approval at 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% completion.
B. Each submittal will include a review meeting with the City.
C. Adjust Construction Drawing PDF copy and 3 full size copies
Task 4 — Bid Administration
4.1 Pre -Bid Meeting — Attend the pre-bid meeting and respond to contractor requests for clarification
during the bid process.
4.2 Addendums - After a question and answer period addendums will follow as needed to complete
package and clarify bid.
4.3 Award Bid — provide consultation to City in awarding contract according to bids received and
contractor qualifications for the Project area.
Task 5 — Construction Administration
The City has not requested this Task, but it is highly recommended in order to make sure site construction
is aligned with the design intent of the Landscape Architect, ESA and Construction Documents.
5.1 Pre -Construction Meeting — facilitate meeting at the City and on site. Confirm roles and Contract
requirements of City, Contractor and MDG.
5.2 Submittal Review — review material submittals from Contractor to confirm materials meet the design
intent of the Contract Documents. Provide direction for alternate materials if needed.
5.3 Amendments to documents — issue as needed throughout project if necessary, to incorporate changes
to Construction Documents.
5.4 RFI (Reauests for Information) — respond to contractor requests
5.5 Memorandum Directives and Field Orders- provide to contractor as needed
5.6 Change Order Reauests — review and provide recommendations to City staff. Issue as needed.
5.7 Field Observations and Inspections per plans and specifications
Typical observations include site visits to report layout, rough grade, concrete formwork, concrete finish,
plant material, irrigation installation and finished site work. Field reports will follow eadi observation and
be submitted to the Construction Manager, City and contractor with confirmation of the work or suggested
remedies.
5.8 Reporting administration documents as needed to the City and Contractor.
MDG
MELTON
820 BROADWAY ST CHICO CA 95928 - 530.899.1616
1930 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.754.2153
MELTONDG.COM
ATTACHMENT B - CONTRACT #1819165
-ISA!.
Time and Materials Estimate
Riverside Pork Restoration and Regeneration
Project Team Hours Per Task
MDG
MELTON
Tas4
Des cnpbon
Director II
Ri deal
londuape
Architect
Protect
nager
MSpecialist
Irrigation
SPac
Ma aging
Associate111
Managing
Associate 11
Senior
Associate li
Sento,
Associate I
Technicians and
AssociatesClerlcol
Suis Totals
Totals
Hours
0200
Hours
5165
Haum
$132
Hours
5120
Hours
0180
Hours
1170
Hours
5150
Hours
$140
Hours
185
Hours
563
Hours
Fees
$0
1.0
PROJECT INMATION AND SITE ANALYSIS,
0
50
56
58,388
E. RWOCB 40, -(Johann,
4
5800
0
80
8
51,058
0
50
0
50
0
50
28
54,200
0
514,174
1.1
K,ck off Meeting
0
00
4
$662
6
1794
0
50
0
50
6
r
$1,020
0
50
0
e
SO
......
0
10
0
50
16
52,475
00
1.2
Topographic Survey Adequacy Reriew
0
SO
2
5331
2
5265
0
50
0
50
7
0340
0
SO
4
0560
0
50
0
SO
10
01,495
10
1.3
B,. Map
0
SO
0
80
1
0132
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
SO
0
50
6
5510
0
50
7
5642
..4
Site Anolysis
0
SO
4
1662
8
51,058
0
00
8
51,440
8
51,360
20
13,000
0
50
12
11,020
0
80
60
18,540
1.5
Utility Notifications and Applications
0
50
0
50
4
$529
2
8240
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
50
4
5252
10
$1,021
20
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL MASTER PLAN
-4.`
2 '
Basis of Design Plan
,
,
e
.•$89,458
A. Hydro'ogic Analysis
0
00
0
$0
0
50
0
00
0
00
20
53,400
0
50
0
50
40
03,400
0
50
60
$6,800
B. Wetland De ineation
2
5331
0
50
0
SO
0
50
0
50
6
51,020
48
57,200
0
50
20
11,700
0
50
76
510,251
C. Habitat Assessment
8
51,323
0
50
4
5529
0
50
4
0720
0
50
60
09,000
0
$0
8
5680
0
$0
84
112,252
D.80115 of Design Technical Memo
0
10
0
SO
0
SO
0
50
44
07,920
32
$5,440
20
53,000
0
00
0
50
0
S0
96
516,360
2.2
Preliminary Master Plan
0
50
12
01,985
24
53,175
8
1960
12
12,160
16
02,720
0
50
0
50
60
05,100
2
5126
134
116,226
2.3
Pne1,...,0 Cop Estimate
0
SO
2
0331
6
5794
3
0360
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
$O
12
51,020
0
SO
23
12,505
2.4
Stakeholder Meeting 01
0
50
7
51,158
10
51,323
0
50
0
$0
0
10
0
50
0
SO
12
01,020
0
SO
29
53,501
2.5
Master Plan Refinement
0
50
10
$1,654
18
52,381
0
50
8
51,440
8
81,360
0
SO
0
50
30
02,550
0
50
74
09,385
2.6
Stakeholder Meeting 02
0
50
8
51,323
10
01,323
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
00
0
$0
8
5680
0
SO
26
03,326
2.7
find, Moiler Plan and Council Approval
0
50
12
51,985
18
52,381
2
1240
4
0720
4
5680
0
00
0
50
32
52,720
2
5126
74
$8,852
3.0
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
$85,293
3.1
Construction Drawings and Specification
0
00
24
53,970
64
58,467
32
53,840
20
$3,600
20
13,400
0
SO
0
10
182
$15,470
8
`
$504
350
139,251
3.2
Po, Tit App''kotions - see below for Optional Permits D through G
0
$0
0
00
4
5529
0
$0
0
50
40
56,800
0
$0
0,
SO
0
00
0
00
44
87,329
A. C9y of Ukiah 84,.din9 Penni,
0
50
0
50
4
0520
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
00
0
50
8
5680
0
50
12
11,209
B. County of Mendocino Building Permit
0
$0
0
50
4
5529
0
00
0
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
$0
8
5680
0
SO
12
51,209
C. Courcy of Mendocino Flood Husord Zone Development Permit
8
51,323
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
SO
0
50
80
SI 1,200
0
S0
0
SO
88
512,523
H. Storm Water Poilurlon Preventive Pion ISWPPPI
0
50
0
50
0
5O
0
50
0
50
8
$1,360
0
50
40
55,600
0
10
0
SO
48
56,960
3.3
Cop Estimates
0
50
4
5662
8
51,058
3
$360
12
52,160
12
52,040
0
50
0
50
36
03,060
0
50
75
59,340
3.4
Contract Document,
0
50
1
5165
6
5794
0
50
0
50
0
50
0
$0
0
50
20
51,700
0
SO
27
52,659
3.5
Submittal Press and Knal Construction Documents
0
50
4
5662
16
52,117
0
50
0
50
0
$0
0
$0
0
50
18
51,530
8
5504
46
54,812
4.0
MD ADMINISTRATION
6- -4w
1
54.791
4.1
Respond to Bidder Questions
0
f0
2
5331
4
5529
0
SO
0
50
0
50
0
SO
0
50
4
5340
0
SO
10
51,200
4.2
Pre.Bid Meeting
0
f0
4
5662
4
5579
0
50
0
50
0
SO
0
50
0
50
0
SO
0
50
8
51,191
4.3
Addenda
0
50
2
5331
4
5529
0
SO
0
50
0
10
0
50
0
50
4
0340
0
SO
10
11,200
4 4
Bid Review and Evaluation
0
50
2
0331
4
0529
0
$0
0
50
0
10
0
00
0
50
4
5340
0
00
10
51,200
TOTALS
18
$2,977
104
517,202
233
130,826
50
86,000,
112
520,160'
192
030,940
148
522,200
124
517,360
524
$44,540
24
51,512
1519
$193,717
SUBTOTAL
5193,717
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
59,686
TOTAL FEE PROPOSAL (EXCLUDING OPTIONAL TASKS)
1203,403
3.2
OPTIONAL PERMIT TASKS
527,840
O. USACE 404. Opnono
4
v
5800
0
50
12
51,593
0
50
0
$0
0
SD
40
56,000
0
$0
0
SO
0
50
56
58,388
E. RWOCB 40, -(Johann,
4
5800
0
80
8
51,058
0
50
0
50
0
50
28
54,200
0
SO
0
SO
0
50
40
56,058
=. CDFW 1600 - Gonion.;'.
4
5800
0
50
4
5529
0
50
0
S0
0
SO
28
$4,300
0
00
0
SO
0
SO
36
55,529
r. Cultural Resource. Repot• - Option°,,
4
5800
0
SO
2
5205
0
50
0
50
40
56,600
0
50
0
10
0
50
0
50
46
57,865
MELTONDESIGN:.'+.��u�`•.
2019 SCHEDULE OF RATES
MDG PERSONNEL
Principal Landscape Architect
Associate Landscape Architect
Project Manager
GIS Specialist
Irrigation Specialist
Irrigation Associate
Graphic Designer
Drafting Technician I
Drafting Technician 8
Administration
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
$165.40/hour
$143.30/hour
$132.30/ hour
$110.25/hour
$121.30/ hour
$ 77.20/ hour
$103.95/ hour
$ 85.00/ hour
$ 73.50/ hour
$ 63.00/ hour
Black and White Plan Print $ .85 / square foot
Color Plan Print $ 4.45 / square foot
Premium Color Glossy Plan Print $ 6.60 / square foot
Foam Core $12.10 each
B & W Copies, 8.5 X 11 $ .28 each
B & W Copies, 11 X 17 $ .50 each
Color Copies 8.5 x 11 $ 1.25 each
Color Copies 11 X 17 $ 2.30 each
Binding Covers 8.5 x 11 $ 2.80 each
Binding Covers 11 x 17 $ 5.60 each
Flash Drive $ 7.75 each
Overnight Mail Cost Plus 15%
Courier Cost Plus 15%
Photography Cost Plus 15%
Soils Analysis Cost Plus 15%
Travel / Automobile IRS 2019 RATE / mile
. Rates subject to change after one year of proposal
MDQ
820 BROADWAY 50 CNICO CA 95928 - 570.899.1616
1970 G ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 - 916.756.2157
MELTONOG.COM