HomeMy WebLinkAboutCounty of Mendocino 2019-02-20 - geotechCOU #1819-169
PA #_1L14.
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF UKIAH AND THE
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO SHARING THE COST OF
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR COUNTY AIRPORT LAND
USE PLAN UPDATE
This Agreement is made and entered in Ukiah, California on February 20, 2019
("Effective Date"), between the City of Ukiah ("City"), a general law municipal corporation, and
the County of Mendocino ("County"), a political subdivision of the State of California. The City
and County may be referred to herein separately as a "Party" and collectively as "the Parties."
RECITALS:
1. The Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC"), formed pursuant to Public
Utilities Code Section 21670, adopted a countywide Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
("ALUCP"), the Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, on October 21,
1993, which was revised on June 6, 1996.
2. According to the California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Airport
Land Use Planning Handbook, which outlines statutory requirements for ALUCs and ALUCPs
in accordance with Public Utilities Code Sections 21670 — 21679.5, a comprehensive review and
update of the ALUCP is recommended at least every five years.
3. Since last revised, among other changes that have occurred, the Federal Aviation
Administration has modified the Runway Protection Zone ("RPZ") and on May 20, 2015 the
City adopted a revised Airport Layout Plan for the Ukiah Municipal Airport.
4. Due to the passage of time and the above -recited changes affecting the Ukiah Municipal
Airport, the City and the County have agreed to jointly fund updating the ALUCP for the Ukiah
Municipal Airport only.
5. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions under which the City
will contract with Mead and Hunt, Inc. ("Consultant") to provide consulting services to the
ALUC to assist in the development, consideration of and adoption of revisions to the ALUCP.
AGREEMENT:
In consideration and reliance upon the above -recitals, the terms and conditions stated below and
other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties
agree as follows.
1. City to Contract with Consultant. The City will contract with Consultant to perform the
scope of work for the fees and expenses set forth in the attached Exhibit A. County shall not be
considered a party to the Consulting Agreement and shall have no responsibility or liability for
the Consultant's performance or for payment of its fees. County shall provide the staff support
and coordination assigned to it under Exhibit A.
1
COU #1819-169
1.1 City will assign staff to perform the City's responsibilities as described in Exhibit A
and provide County with their names and contact information.
1.2 County will assign staff to perform the County's responsibilities as described in
Exhibit A and provide City and Consultant with their names and contact information.
1.3 Both City and County will strive to diligently perform the tasks assigned to them in
Exhibit A and this Agreement and to complete those tasks within the time estimated for their
completion as set forth in Exhibit A.
2. Payment for Consulting Services. The City will pay Consultant in accordance with Exhibit
A. County shall reimburse the City for up to one third ($43,333.33) of the total cost as its share
of Consultant's fee as detailed in Exhibit A. If the Consultant fee increases in accordance with
the Exhibit A within the existing Scope of Work, the County contribution shall increase in
proportion to its share of the fee quoted in Exhibit A. There shall be no change to the Scope of
Work without the prior written consent of the City and the County. Any cost of any change in the
Scope of Work sought by one party shall be paid by the Party seeking the change, even though
approved by both Parties. If the change in the Scope of Work is sought by both Parties, they shall
pay respective shares of that cost as they shall agree in the writing approving the change. The
City will submit routine invoices to the County for reimbursement during the engagement along
with the corresponding billing detail from the Consultant.
3. Coordination of Consultant Services. The Parties shall perform the coordination functions as
generally described in Exhibit A. County shall be responsible for facilitating communication
between the Consultant and the ALUC, for scheduling meetings of the ALUC to consider
communications from the Consultant and providing staff and clerical support for the ALUC. The
Parties understand and acknowledge that the ALUC is an independent commission established in
accordance with state law and the County is not responsible for and shall have no liability for the
decisions and actions of the ALUC, unless specifically imposed on County by state law.
4. Mutual Defense. In the event an action or proceeding is brought against the ALUC, the
County or any officer or employee thereof to attack, review, set aside, void or annul the ALUC's
adoption of revisions to the ALUCP or the environmental document which accompanies it, the
City and the County shall jointly defend the action or proceeding, sharing costs of the defense
equally. Outside counsel may be used to defend the decision, if both the City and the County
agree to use outside counsel. If jointly funding the defense, both parties shall exercise equal
control over the conduct thereof
If, during the administrative proceedings conducted to revise the ALUCP, the parties agree that
additional costs should be incurred for outside legal counsel or consulting services, they shall
each share those costs equally.
5. Access to County GIS. During the term of this Agreement, County shall provide City and
Consultant with remote access to the County's GIS system for performing tasks identified in
Exhibit A, subject to any reasonable conditions generally applied to similar users of the GIS
system.
2
' COU #1819-169
6. Miscellaneous.
6.1 Choice of Law. This Agreement, and any dispute arising from the relationship
between the parties to this Agreement, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California,
excluding any laws that direct the application of another jurisdiction's laws.
6.2 Venue. All lawsuits relating to this contract must be filed in Mendocino County
Superior Court, Mendocino County, California.
6.3 Waiver. No waiver of a breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy
contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in
writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any
breach, failure, right or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or
remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the
writing so specifies.
6.4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including all attachments, exhibits, and any
other documents specifically incorporated into this Agreement, shall constitute the entire
agreement between County and Contractor relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. As
used herein, Agreement refers to and includes any documents incorporated herein by reference
and any exhibits or attachments. This Agreement supersedes and merges all previous
understandings, and all other agreements, written or oral, between the parties and sets forth the
entire understanding of the parties regarding the subject matter thereof. This Agreement may not
be modified except by a written document signed by both parties.
6.5 Headings. Herein are for convenience of reference only and shall in no way affect
interpretation of this Agreement.
6.6 Modification of Agreement. This Agreement may be supplemented, amended or
modified only by the mutual agreement of the parties. No supplement, amendment or
modification of this Agreement shall be binding unless it is in writing and signed by authorized
representatives of both parties.
6.7 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction holds any provision of this
Agreement to be illegal, unenforceable, or invalid in whole or in part for any reason, the validity
and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions of them, will not be affected, unless
an essential purpose of this Agreement would be defeated by the loss of the illegal,
unenforceable, or invalid provision.
6.8 Notice. Whenever written notice is required or permitted under this Agreement, it
shall be deemed given and received as follows:
a. If given by overnight courier, certified mail, return receipt requested or
personal delivery, it shall be deemed given and received on the date received.
b. If given by fax or email, it shall be deemed given and received, when the
sender receives an acknowledgment of receipt.
3
COU #1819-169
c. When sent by regular first-class mail, it shall be deemed given and received, 48
hours after the notice is deposited in the mail.
The notice shall be deemed given and received as provided above, if sent to the address,
fax number or email address specified below.
City of Ukiah
Craig Schlatter, Community Development
Director
Ukiah Civic Center
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
Email: cschlatter@cityofukiah.com
County of Mendocino
Brent Schultz, Director of Planning
and Building Services
County Administration Offices
501 Low Gap Road, Room 1030
Ukiah, CA 95482
Email: schultzb@mendocinocounty.org
WHEREFORE, the Parties have entered this Agreement on the Effective Date.
CITY OF UKIAH
giacomo, City Manager
ATTEST:
stine Lawler, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
David pport, i • tt. mey
4
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
Offic
el J. Angelo, County Executive
ATTEST:
Karla Van Hagen, Se 'or Deputy Clerk
Katharine L. Elliott, County Coun el
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
DEPARTMENT FISCAL REVIEW: CONTRACTOR/COMPANY NAME
_ iii "61'411
DEPARTM!"% % DATE
Budgeted: ® Yes •
Budget Unit: 2851
Line Item: 862189
Grant: ❑ Yes ® No
Grant No.: N/A
CARMEL J. ANGELO, Chief Executive Officer
PURCHASING AGENT
Date: a • L0•1ci
INSURANCE REVIEW:
By:
/I
Risk Management
Date: °\40���
EXECUTIVE OFFICE/FISCAL REVIEW:
By:
Deputy CEO
Date: 3/ v/1't
By: See Page 4
Date:
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR:
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Ave.
Ukiah, CA 95482
By signing above, signatory warrants and
represents that he/she executed this Agreement in
his/her authorized capacity and that by his/her
signature on this Agreement, he/she or the entity
upon behalf of which he/she acted, executed this
Agreement
COUNTY COUNSEL REVIEW:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHARINE L. ELLIOTT,
County Counsel
By:
Date:
---
Signatory Authority: $0-25,000 Department; $25,001- 50,000 Purchasing Agent; $50,001+ Board of Supervisors
Exception to Bid Process Required/Completed ❑
Mendocino County Business License: Valid ❑
Exempt Pursuant to MCC Section:
5
ATTACHMENT A - CONTRACT 1819164
UKIAH MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN
SCOPE OF SERVICES
2019.01-31
This document outlines the Scope of Services (SCOPE) to be provided by Mead & Hunt, Inc.
(CONTRACTOR) for preparation of a new Ukiah Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
(UKIALUCP) under contract with the City of Ukiah (CITY). Responsibilities of CITY under this agreement
are also listed.
The new UKIALUCP is intended to replace the Ukiah Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan,
which is currently included as part of the Mendocino County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan
(MCACLUP) adopted by the Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) in 1993, and later
amended. The new UKIALUCP will be a complete plan unto itself and separate from policies or other
content contained in the remainder of the MCACLUP.
Although CITY owns the Ukiah Municipal Airport (UKI) and has land use control over most of the
surrounding area, implementation of the new UKIALUCP will first require adoption by ALUC. ALUC
functions under the auspices of the County of Mendocino (COUNTY). Participation of COUNTY/ALUC is
essential to accomplishment of SCOPE. Specific responsibilities of COUNTY/ALUC under this agreement
are listed herein.
The overall endeavor under SCOPE, including responsibilities of CITY and COUNTY/ALUC, is referred to
herein as PROJECT.
Element 1. Project Management and Coordination
1.1 Project Administration
CONTRACTOR shall perform routine administrative duties including regular communication with CITY
staff, processing contract documents, and monthly invoicing for the anticipated twelve (12) month
duration of PROJECT.
1.2 Coordination with County/ALUC
PROJECT will require efficient coordination among CONTRACTOR, CITY, and COUNTY/ALUC. Much of
this coordination will be accomplished via conference calls. In-person meetings, including public
meetings, are also provided. The purposes of some meetings will be to enable CONTRACTOR to obtain
information from CITY and COUNTY/ALUC necessary for preparation of UKIALUCP, as well as feedback
on draft materials to be prepared by CONTRACTOR. Other meetings will be public meetings for
presentation of a draft UKIALUCP or components thereof, for obtaining public input, and ultimately for
adoption of the UKIALUCP by ALUC. The timing and function of individual meetings are identified in
subsequent tasks.
Mead&i-Iunt
• Ukiah Municipal Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan
Scope of Services
SCOPE provides for a total of up to six (6) project trips for staff -level and public meetings to be attended
in person by one (1) CONTRACTOR staff and up to six (6) conference calls involving CONTRACTOR,
CITY, and COUNTY/ALUC representative. Any in-person staff -level and public meetings held on the
same day will be counted as a single meeting.
CONTRACTOR DELIVERABLES
• Final scope, budget, and schedule.
• Monthly communication with C/TY staff for purposes of tracking progress, schedule, and budget.
• Monthly invoices and status reports.
• Participation in meetings with CITY and COUNTY/ALUC as described under Task 1.2 (all meetings
are budgeted under this element).
CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
Identify an individual with whom CONTRACTOR shall maintain coordination and who shall participate
in PROJECT meetings.
• Arrange rooms, noticing PROJECT meetings, distribute deliverables, and maintain overall
coordination with the COUNTY/ALUC.
COUNTY/ALUC RESPONSIBILITIES
identify an individual or individuals with whom CITY staif shall coordinate and who shall participate in
PROJECT meetings.
Schedule and agendize ALUC meetings where PROJECT is to be discussed or acted upon.
Element 2. Data Collection and Compilation
2.1 Kickoff Meeting
CONTRACTOR shall formally begin PROJECT by making a presentation to ALUC. This presentation will
allow CONTRACTOR staff to introduce ourselves and outline the work products, schedule and planned
interaction among CONTRACTOR, CITY, and COUNTY/ALUC.
2.2 Airport and Land Use Data and Mapping
PROJECT will require certain background data and maps regarding UKI and surrounding land uses in
CITY and COUNTY jurisdictions to be made available to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will rely upon
CITY and COUNTY to provide the following data:
Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Drawing: California state law requires that an ALUCP be based on a
current master plan of the airport or, if none exists, a current ALP may be used with the approval of
the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics. The Division typically requests an ALP that has been approved
by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). As CITY has not recently adopted a Master Plan for UKI,
CONTRACTOR will utilize the FM -approved 2015 ALP drawing. The existing and future airfield
configurations depicted in the 2015 ALP will be reflected in new UKIALUCP maps. CONTRACTOR
will submit the UKI ALP to Caltrans for approval as the basis for UKIALUCP.
Meadalunt
Page 2
X121122001190459.O11CFEEkwrkingIUKJ AIUCP.MeadHunl scops.2019.01-31.dooc
Ukiah Municipal Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan
Scope of Services
▪ Airport Activity and Flight Track Data: CONTRACTOR will work with airport management, other
CITY staff, and airport tenants familiar with UKI to estimate the current composition and overall level
of aircraft operations at UKI utilizing readily available data. These sources will also be asked to assist
with mapping of typical flight routes used by various types of aircraft operating at UKI.
• Airspace Plan Drawing: The Airspace Plan drawing shows the critical airspace surfaces established
in accordance with Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use, and Preservation
of the Navigable Airspace. The Airspace Plan will be used to establish height restrictions for the areas
surrounding UKI.
• Land Use Data and Mapping: CONTRACTOR shall rely upon GIS data from CITY and COUNTY
depicting existing land uses and the adopted general plan land use designations within the UKI vicinity.
CONTRACTOR shall also review adopted CITY and COUNTY general plans and other policy
documents for information and policies pertaining to land uses around UKI.
2.3 Activity Forecasts and Noise Contours
By law, ALUCPs must have a time horizon of at least 20 years. The activity data and forecasts are used
to generate projected aircraft noise contours.
▪ Activity Forecasts: Using activity data obtained in Task 2.2, CONTRACTOR shall prepare new UKI
aircraft operations forecasts for the year 2040.
▪ Noise Contours: Using current activity data and forecasts of future operations together with flight
track information from Task 2.2, CONTRACTOR shall prepare Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL) noise contours for current and 2040 aircraft operations at UKI.' Contours will be depicted in 5
dB increments for CNEL 55 dB and above. The FM's AEDT noise model will be used. The 2040
contours will take into account both the current and proposed configurations of the UKI runway as
shown on the 2015 ALP.
2.4 Background Data Chapter
Documentation of facts pertaining to UKI and land uses around it is an essential foundation to
UKIALUCP. It also will form the basis for the environmental impact analysis to be completed in Element 4.
Once the airport and land use information has been gathered and sorted, CONTRACTOR shall prepare
new maps and data tables for inclusion as a Background Data chapter in UKIALUCP. The
CONTRACTOR shall hold a conference call with the CITY and COUNTY/ALUC representatives to obtain
comments on and corrections to the Background Data chapter.
CONTRACTOR DELIVERABLES
• List to be provided to CITY and COUNTY indicating airport and land use data needs for UKIALUCP.
• Letter to Caltrans requesting acceptance of 2015 UKI ALP as basis of UKIALUCP.
▪ Draft UKIALUCP Background Data chapter for review by CITY and COUNTY.
CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
• Assist CONTRACTOR in obtaining or estimating current UKI aircraft activity and flight track data.
Mead lunt
Page 3
X.121122001190459 011CFEEE1worklnq\VKl ALJJCP MeadHwrt scope 2019-01.31.doc,,
• Ukiah Municipal Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan
Scope of Services
• Provide CONTRACTOR with current land use and future land use designation maps in GIS format for
areas in CITY jurisdiction.
• Review draft Background Data chapter and provide corrections to CONTRACTOR.
COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
• Provide CONTRACTOR with current land use and future land use designation maps in GIS format for
areas in COUNTY jurisdiction.
• Review draft Background Data chapter and provide corrections to CONTRACTOR.
Element 3. Draft ALUCP Preparation
3.1 Impact Identification
Consistent with the guidelines in the 2011 California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (Handbook),
the UKIALUCP will continue to address the four types of compatibility concerns in a composite manner:
• Noise is the impact most directly affected by the airport activity forecasts.
• Safety is the compatibility concern associated with the risks that potential aircraft accidents pose to
people and property on the ground. Using data and guidance from the 2011 Handbook,
CONTRACTOR shall delineate locations around UKI where heightened risk levels may warrant
restrictions on future land use development.
Airspace Protection is critical to airport viability in that airspace obstructions can be hazards to flight
and can necessitate changes to aircraft flight procedures. The UKI Airspace Plan will be used to depict
this critical airspace. Additionally, FAA guidelines will be used to map locations where certain types of
land uses can attract birds in a manner that can be hazardous to aircraft in flight.
Overflight pertains to areas beyond the noise contours where aircraft noise can be annoying or
disruptive. For general aviation airports, the area of overflight concern is primarily within and near the
aircraft traffic pattern.
Using the aeronautical and land use data gathered in the preceding tasks, CONTRACTOR shall map and
describe the magnitude and extent of these concerns. The combined geographic extent of the four impact
concerns will constitute the UKI influence area.
CONTRACTOR shall identify the compatibility factors that have changed in a manner that warrant a
change to the 1993 (as amended) UKIALUCP compatibility zones and/or criteria. CONTRACTOR shall
also identify the basic strategies available for addressing the changed conditions. CONTRACTOR shall
summarize this information in a Discussion Paper to be presented to CITY and COUNTY/ALUC and hold
a conference call to obtain feedback.
3.2 Draft Policies Chapter
The centerpiece of an ALUCP is the policy section. There are two types of policies that an ALUCP must
include: compatibility policies and procedural policies. Compatibility policies and associated maps
establish the basis for an ALUC's determination of whether proposed land use plans and projects are
Meadalunt
Page 4
X '21 122001190459,01\CPEEkwrklnpkUKt ALUCP MeadHunt scope.2019-01-31.docx
• Ukiah Municipal Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan
Scope of Services
compatible with the airport involved. Procedural policies define the steps to be followed both by local
agencies in referring actions for ALUC review and by an ALUC in conducting the reviews.
The ALUC's 1993 compatibility and procedural policies for UKI are outdated and do not conform to
guidance in the Caltrans 2011 Handbook. Regardless of this status, because these are the adopted
policies now In effect, CONTRACTOR will consider them as a starting point for preparation of policies for
the new UKIALUCP. Nevertheless, significant clarification, expansion, and potential substantive changes
to the current policies are envisioned. As part of PROJECT, CONTRACTOR shall prepare a complete
new Policies chapter containing both compatibility and procedural policies applicable only to UKI, not the
other airports for which ALUC has responsibility. A composite Compatibility Map, similar in concept to the
one in the 1993 CLUP for UKI, which reflects the combined effects of all four compatibility concerns will
be in the Policies chapter.
The Policies chapter will be presented in draft form to CITY and COUNTY/ALUC for discussion and
feedback. Separately, CONTRACTOR shall prepare a Discussion Paper listing major differences in
compatibility and procedural policies between those currently in effect and the ones contained in the draft
Policies chapter. The CONTRACTOR shall hold a conference call with CITY and COUNTY/ALUC
representatives to seek input to the Discussion Paper.
3.3 General Plan Consistency Review
For CITY and COUNTY/ALUC to understand the implications of the draft UKIALUCP upon their plans and
policies, they will want to know where the conflicts lie. In this task, CONTRACTOR shall conduct a
preliminary review of CITY and COUNTY general plans to assess the extent to which they may be
inconsistent with the draft ALUCP criteria. CONTRACTOR shall emphasize the adopted general plan land
use maps but shall also assess whether other types of essential airport land use compatibility measures,
such as limits on heights of antennas and other structures, are in place. The outcome of this review will
initially be presented to CITY and COUNTY/ALUC but will later become a central component of the CEQA
document for the draft UKIALUCP. The CONTRACTOR shall hold a conference call with the CITY and
COUNTY/ALUC representatives to discuss the results of the consistency analysis.
3.4 Administrative Draft and Public Draft UKIALUCP
The intent of PROJECT is to produce a new, self-contained UKIALUCP. In this task, CONTRACTOR shall
assemble a complete draft document for presentation to CITY and COUNTY/ALUC. CONTRACTOR shall
modify the draft Background Data and Policies chapters (prepared in Tasks 2,4 and 3.3) in response to
comments from CITY and COUNTY/ALUC. Also to be included in the draft document shall be an
Introduction Chapter explaining the purpose of the UKIALUCP and the respective roles of CITY and
COUNTY/ALUC in implementing its policies. Standard appendix material (current state laws regarding
ALUCs, FAA airspace protection regulations, typical avigation easement wording, glossary, etc.) will also
be included.
The UKIALUCP will initially be prepared as an Administrative Draft for review at the staff level by CITY
and COUNTY/ALUC. Following receipt of staff comments, CONTRACTOR shall make essential revisions
and produce a Public Draft to be made available for public review and comment. The CONTRACTOR
Mead&Hunt
Page 5
X t2112200 A 1904 59 01,CFEEVworkl,9\UKl ALUCP.MeadHuri scope. 2019-01.31.doca
Ukiah Municipal Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan
Scope of Services
shall hold a conference call to present the Administrative Draft UKIALUCP to the CITY and
COUNTY/ALUC representatives. COUNTY Director of Planning and Building Services and CITY Director
of Community Development shall provide written approval of the Draft UKIALUCP to CONTRACTOR and
CITY before the Draft UKIALUCP is released for public review or presented to any public commission,
council or board.
CONTRACTOR DELIVERABLES
Draft Policies chapter for CiTY and COUNTY/ALUC review.
General plan consistency review.
Administrative Draft UKIALUCP (pdf format).
• Public Draft UKIALUCP (pdf format).
CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
• Review draft material and provide feedback to CONTRACTOR within one week of receipt.
• Prior to document release, provide written approval of the Draft UKIALUCP to CONTRACTOR.
• Make Public Draft available on CITY website.
COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
▪ Review draft material and provide feedback to CONTRACTOR.
• Prior to document release, provide written approval of the Draft UKIALUCP to CONTRACTOR.
• Make Public Draft available on COUNTY/ALUC website and distribute public noticing of document's
availability.
Element 4. Environmental Impact Documentation
4.1 Displacement Analysis
Adoption and implementation of the Draft UKIALUCP could result in changes to future development
patterns by shifting or displacing the location of future residential and nonresidential land uses in the UKI
influence area. The purpose of the displacement analysis is to identify conflicts with the land use and
growth patterns provided in CITY and COUNTY planning documents and to determine the extent to which
future development would be displaced. With certain exceptions, the displacement analysis will quantify
the potential displacement of residential uses and qualify potential future displacement of nonresidential
uses. This analysis will supplement the initial general plan consistency review conducted as part of the
Element 3 work. CONTRACTOR shall provide the displacement results to CITY and COUNTY/ALUC for
review and comment as it will become the central component of the CEQA documentation. The
CONTRACTOR shall hold an in-person meeting to present the displacement results to CITY and
COUNTY/ALUC staff representatives and invited key stakeholders.
4.2 CEQA Initial Study/Negative Declaration
This task accomplishes preparation of environmental impact documentation necessary for adoption of the
UKIALUCP in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the 2007 California
Supreme Court decision in Muzzy Ranch Company v. Solano County Airport Land Use Commission. An
Mead&l-Iunt
Page 6
X.\21 12200/190459.011CFEE,AorkinplUK1 ALUCPMeadHunl scope 2019.01J1.doca
• Ukiah Municipal Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan
Scope of Services
ALUCP is regulatory in nature and does not involve physical construction but does have indirect impacts.
Accordingly, CONTRACTOR shall analyze the environmental impacts associated with the UKIALUCP and
shall emphasize the issues associated with project implementation; specifically; noise, land use,
population and housing, and cumulative impacts.
CONTRACTOR shall document the results of the above analysis in an Initial Study structured in
accordance with CEQA requirements. Recognizing that the assessment will focus on where the new
UKIALUCP will increase restrictions on underlying land uses, CONTRACTOR anticipates that the
likelihood of significant displaced development to be low. CONTRACTOR expects that a Negative
Declaration incorporating the Initial Study will be sufficient to achieve CEQA compliance. If this should
prove not to be the case, then the Initial Study can serve as the basis for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) under a subsequent or amended contract agreement. CONTRACTOR shall submit
the CEQA document to the State Clearinghouse.
CONTRACTOR DELIVERABLES
▪ Discussion paper outlining the displacement results (pdf format).
• Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration (pdf format).
• State Clearinghouse submittal package.
CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
• Review Discussion Paper and Draft Initial Study and provide comments to CONTRACTOR.
▪ Make CEQA document available on CITY website.
COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
▪ Review Discussion Paper and Draft Initial Study and provide comments to CONTRACTOR.
• Make CEQA document available on COUNTY/ALUC website and distribute public noticing of
document's availability as required by law.
Element 5. Review and Adoption
5.1 Presentation to ALUC
At the outset of the public review period, CONTRACTOR shall make a presentation to ALUC to describe
the draft UKIALUCP, its differences from the current plan, and major findings of the environmental review.
The ALUC meeting should be structured to allow public comment on the draft UKIALUCP and CEQA
document. Two additional trips are provided to present the draft UKIALUCP to joint meetings of 1) the
City Council and Board of Supervisors; and 2) the Ukiah Planning Commission and Mendocino County
Planning Commission..
5.2 Response to Comments
CONTRACTOR shall tabulate comments received on the draft UKIALUCP made during the ALUC
meeting or subsequently received in writing. CONTRACTOR shall include brief responses to each
comment and indicate recommended changes to the draft UKIALUCP. CONTRACTOR shall list
recommended revisions to the draft ALUCP in a formal Addendum.
Mead&Hunt
Page 7
X 12112200\ 190459.011CFEE\ r IngtUKI ALUCP.M. dHunl scop. 201901-31.daca
• Ukiah Municipal Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan
Scope of Services
5.4 Adoption by ALUC
CONTRACTOR shall make a presentation to the ALUC summarizing the comments received and
revisions proposed for the UKIALUCP at an ALUC hearing. Approval of the environmental document and
adoption of the UKIALUCP will require formal actions by ALUC. CONTRACTOR shall assist CITY and
COUNTY staff with preparation of the staff report and adopting documents for the approval of the
environmental document and adoption of the UKIALUCP.
5.5 Final ALUCP
After ALUC adopts the UKIALUCP, CONTRACTOR shall prepare a final version of the UKIALUCP
incorporating all the changes listed in the Addendum. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY and COUNTY
with one hard copy each of the final plan and a CD containing all text, GIS maps, and other final
document material in their original digital file formats.
Element 6. Additional Services
While the deliverables and basic work effort required for the project are known, many times a need arises
for additional services. CONTRACTOR recommends that the work scope include a contingency budget of
at least five thousand dollars ($5,000) to cover unanticipated tasks.
Meadc-lunt
Page 8
X 2l 12200\ 190459.011CFEE\warising 1UKl ALUCP MeadHunl scope 201G-01-31 Poo.*
ATTACHMENT B - CONTRACT #1819164
Attachment 8
Ukiah Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
Mead Hunt Pralect budge
'saucy 10, 1011
W000 PIAN
AepOri Layaad
01YQ
INM
E2tKM7S
TOM.
Pf1C[MM
element 1 endiro Masa6amae4 Cew4a0en. and Weaves
5271&k
Sli 170
SS74
1 Ig
614 f74
24%
zdx
Owner 1 gots C.0.lb.& AM CwrreW lien
laments Orals AIUOPPaWpethe
S13,110
$1170
SK
11%320
&17,104,
21%
IOY.
Idanent4 Oivirenmamel 4.111 Oanbmbaen
T3eM 0 0, leelae len4 Um�alara
1704
Slid!, Is
SIR
117,91O,
Ssss,Doo
117E
1001E
LUMP SUM TOTAL
ent t: AadldeMl Services
5221
Slab
Omens 1: head M066(emen4 raerdt+odery end chi chinless -..:
.<
Llomat h SC
Amcasvng radar fqM trails nal Haddad
CI1Y flab to provide or coorMalr Oblanrtq GS land use and 2onsq dalis from locai agencss
*anal phawgnphs o4 b. provided by 0e [Bans. w usod tom pubicly avabide 110.20100000
CITY ar COUKTYMLUC 1400 rolponlbie for normo Pubic Draft ALUCP and [EGA document
ONy one pubfc cion Won of CEOA documonia b assumed
Only minor mesons wdc"petW to bo noadaa to ALIKP drab lo aodrase agency et pubic comments,
One CONTRACTOR Lad person b .nand malungs and provide technca2 input, &a distinct proles bps pravdaa 16 haw day no ovamghi su71. Ma eings 071 Was a wmbna0on of PowerPonl and PDF Oaf:Ors
CITY stall losponstee 30110010 quq rooms nalair 3 project meetings meant; av07able protect documents and ov$ral 0004411200 *3011 ALUC Ceram. 00000411 ag.rtors indfor 1111. pubic.
Nu4Pb mootngs may bo scheduled on lama day wawa 1aa*4)10 Add4/0041 meeings 061.100 Mania tpa ar avomghi stays to ba rhar100 ago Rat conbq.ncy task
WON HOURS
TEAM
IAUCHIA
1600Y/ .
31 /HopetA
niCliaP1OI0
„_',SSAMT4
0L121
114011.376D
'SNOW
"7AlTEl
-
010302PUi100
Ilricr
K
ov;
3A.aaiir
PlSMRJ
4AlAit3
Y
PUnkta
A��
i
Tial
Mie
.$110
3216
311/a{EI0.
5221
Slab
Omens 1: head M066(emen4 raerdt+odery end chi chinless -..:
.<
0
U
a
S
2
12
204
._
Oen:0i L dab ealerben an% campealiea
- ;
a
12
24
sc
la
1
ewwant 2: o.ah AWP ripiiraiaen
-.
11
%
4
I4
12 3 F 023F114300042032331'3100.,, 2rMact Wavma300N,
I
1
4
Count S 130`11120 dei AMpa1i11
24
3I
22
211
li
22
1401001011 OUA3:
2
03
.030
24
2S4
201
33
P0MSM' Of TOTAL'
.. 6%
1I%
21%
_. .a%
31%
.... ;lax
g11.
;TOTAL NOtiRS.
.°,�. '_. '�A'r . T„+-°._. _ H
t7g1
Attachment B
Ukiah Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
Mead Hunk Project ludlet
llnuary 10 1017
Element 1'. Project Management, Coordlnallon, and MM4t1a
11NA
rAUOR1
M0011 t
mOUE4oCPU
71400M/50N
SLMTH
0u1/
tMGELS0A0
ual/MtTU
SENIOA
1WYeaw
—
'
ASS1STAfrr
CEuslunur,oN
""'
._.
R' T r
M1QLtt
�noserr
�' om
1A
R ,
MT;
Me
" Y•. G.!
�::y13*
$16.S
SW
1141
1181
�Km 111 months}
I I Pre,1nd JmNat
4
L,1 CDeH.N en and aaeeent+wllh Cnunq/sltK IS ant
$3.eet N
A
1
7
SUMO S
10i
UAW AMP..
2
71
1/
MINCT tMOe COST,
$32
S7,1.3Z
11LL1
1A104 SUITOTAL DOLLARS: [ SZS,214
Tavel It that)
5114
TOTAL EXPENSES;
3.37%
0.UCT
14843
COST
MEMO
TOTAL,
ELEME7f11 TOTAL
ULM
SST/
521,110
Attachment B
Ukiah Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
M4ad hunt Project Judie
January 10 2011
Fitment 2 Data CA2kNdn and Compilation
"^"
ISL
° '
23AR/TE a
N
''a_"t
-L4emaui.
aPoAiffl0l A -
VL -21_-.7-9
`htA4M7
- rlaSaflANr,
CUTAPGTON
NATE
-:pia
illi
ice_ .
L144
,#172
WI
9241 .. .:
21l asN MteO.'IIn.Nlabrje•pmen Wegtle4 under Task 121
21 *.pat and Land UM O. and ktapp144
21 4414.444Eatgtn4!d Ndl.Cnnto2n
24 Nrtirnvn40a M ewer
2,124 4
#
4
4
1
-
-_ a
1
2
20
4
?et
2
2
24
40
-" '1 rT e
„,TOT '31,f
-
2
:: ;
4
32
2i
2
._ t$i
it
74
2
..1j
Di1�QWsacasi
}WC..
lea:>.
:}11,692
"TAT
gyp
,T..--.-,m--:•R-•..-.-«-441-.. .WOR annetAL'Odi.Wdstroa .... lec5..`T- $ •...4'.e-r:z ,wtir,n
vertde3f3
Kant
7o TALDV2MglIMOSIIIIMILI44111a-c.:.atiit:3:
oft/CT
won
. COST
13.112411.1
Tivi-,.. ,
'TOTAL”
E2F40ENY 1 TOTAL -
- -.41=411402113141-444,1-11-,,,,"424.1,4.µ,, -7.3 224474
24,694
E4ment 3: Pratt AMP Neparniet
.TyaAt
F y
1{". �
TN=,
M
;PATH
Care
�WiEdF
{1t�el/r_.4f`'E�lE2
r1fN1M-"' i '. q. ,
"*'
S,..v}1ai
RASSW41102a
-Mot
Oita
:1326
*41.41 1
1.3 l 'cffm
11 roper* ldenylkauan
12 0ra2t pol en CMapin
11 General ma, C40w414n47 4Mew
14 N1rryn,fuatM Nah andPt) <Dealt UaUllCv
- 924 `
2
4
It
16
a
24
1E
2
li
24
li
a
4
la
40
4f
tit
R
K
K
-=0.4444. ,,mitAa6RturrnuipliAti:1
1:: 4:44. t::a r.:-> �, ,. -434.ttd
E10EXSE3 :-sst+r a--ezTaF-- .csi= ^*-•
None
TOTAL DeVit Rr..: 401111164111119ratlialtiiiiiIMMU. .
o14LCT
2A404
222ST
1o04144I2!
'TD?AL
tamer'. 3 TOTAL _ . :... '.:SEi>gastaimerilbolgeof -
$33.3.2s
2133,i20
Attachment B
Ukiah Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
Mead Hunt Project tudtet
lanuan 21 NIT
pimento. Enelrnnmena))n,pid Documentation
TEAM
aunrsa11CN
MAUOI4R
PAPOOPRI
THOmPsom
PLUS
SAMVISMSTAIT
t:T
DRU
ST'S
A6►MOC1LLTIVE
Lt:
• 1
04544.me11l Analy5G
• 2 CEM 664 a, Studyfti err. Oecbtaan.,
TOE
QIR(CtUuOS C lt:
14
14
LMOR StilTOTAL COLLARS: r
i4•41
I
fl niant ant p4►4N'11ate Choc mherwe Subm$L.
56G
TOTAL EXPENSES;
546
oval
ERUCT
WOR
TOR
DOEMISS
TOTAL
ELEMENT 4 TOTAL
117,ao
SN
S11.264
Element 1! Revleua and Addptton
5 1 nein uuen to AWT arne! bm.te+pmxt 6414.714 td.,Oa61 2)
5 2 Act ont. 11 C•mmenu
S 3 4depr'.15 61 ALUC i1 0VN tim♦JeWenut 64441104 ynde Tal. 1 2)
54 Final AWE!
SEAM FAUCNIA ortgrA
__. It2SKYAL
THOMPSON
1G
SAWN
out!
oRSTAO
SONOR -S4--'
AbsosstRUMI
jngttfL
D
Luisa
T2al6etg3
►.ea. nt and 044 '15 (On. . tvtops... ILitt and COAMYS
'TOTAL EXPENSES:
5
tX1.211.425
TOTAL
ESEMENT S TOTAL
1142
$17.330