Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-10-19 Packet CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 October 19, 2016 6:00 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PROCLAMATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation of the Ukiah City Council in Recognition of the Centennial Celebration of Mr. Donald Rones Sr. and His Many Years of Service to Our Community. b. Status Report, Discussion and Possible Action Regarding the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District's Litigation Against the City of Ukiah Related to the Operation of the Sanitary Sewer System. 4. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Minutes of October 5, 2016, a Regular Meeting. 6. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally limits to ninety days(90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Report of Disbursements for the Month of September. b. Consideration and Possible Adoption of Resolution Establishing a Uniform Process of Minute Taking and Meeting Recordation for all City Boards and Commissions. c. Approve a Budget Amendment to Account #22020200.80100 in the Amount $8,808.16, and Approve the Purchase of Forty Portable Radios from Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the Amount of $68,808.16. Page 1 of 3 8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS 10. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK REPORTS 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:15 PM) a. Discussion and Possible Adoption of a Negative Declaration and Discussion and Possible Introduction of a Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Amending Chapter 8 in Division 6; Table 3 in Section 9223.1 of Article 18, Chapter 2 in Division 9; and Section 9254 in Article 19, Chapter 2 in Division 9 of the Ukiah City Code, Entitled "Medical Marijuana Dispensaries". 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Approval of Notice of Completion for the Installation of New Well 9 and Replacement Well 4, Specification No. 16-01. b. Approve Plans and Specification for 2016 Sewer & Water Replacement Project, Specification No. 16-10 and Direct Staff to Advertise for Bids. c. Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Development Schedule. 13. NEW BUSINESS a. Update on Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). 14. CLOSED SESSION — Closed Session may be held at any time during the meeting. a. Conference with Legal Counsel —Anticipated Litigation Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Number of potential cases (1) (Landfill) b. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: City of Ukiah v. Questex, LTD, et al, Mendocino County Superior Court, Case No. SCUK- CVPT-15-66036 c. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Ukiah Valley Sanitation District v. City of Ukiah, Sonoma County Superior Court, Case No. SCV 256737 d. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: County of Mendocino v. Solid Waste System, Inc. et al., Mendocino County Superior Page 2 of 3 Court, Case No. SCUK-CVG-11-59459 e. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Ukiah Citizens for Safety First v. City of Ukiah, Mendocino County Superior Court, Case No. SCUKCVPT 14-63579 f. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.8) Property: 429 South Dora St. Ukiah, CA 95482 Negotiator: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Negotiating Parties: City of Ukiah and Ukiah Unified School District Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment 15. ADJOURNMENT Please be advised that the City needs to be notified 72 hours in advance of a meeting if any specific accommodations or interpreter services are needed in order for you to attend. The City complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the front counter at the Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482, during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda. Dated this 13th day of October, 2016. Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Page 3 of 3 ITEM NO.: 3a %. MEETING DATE: October 19, 2016 k • , City ofUkiah. AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: PROCLAMATION OF THE UKIAH CITY COUNCIL IN RECOGNITION OF THE CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION OF MR. DONALD RONES SR. AND HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO OUR COMMUNITY Summary: Council to issue a proclamation in recognition of Mr. Donald Rones Sr. Background and Discussion: The City of Ukiah takes this time to recognize the service of Mr. Donald Rones Sr. to the City of Ukiah in many ways including time as a City Councilmember, Mayor, Airport Commissioner, Chamber of Commerce President, Men's Golf Representative, and as a member of the Parks and Recreation Commission. The City celebrates Mr. Rones for his contributions to our community and wishes him a happy 100th birthday! FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation Budget Previous Contract Amount in Source of Funds Account Number Amendment or Purchase Order 16-17 FY (Title& No.) Required No. N/A N/A N/A Yes ❑ No ® N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Issue a proclamation in recognition of Mr. Donald Rones Sr. ALTERNATIVES: N/A Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Jim O. Brown, Vice Mayor Contact/Prepared by: Ashley Cocco, Deputy City Clerk Coordinated with: Jim O. Brown, Vice Mayor and Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Presenter: Jim O. Brown, Vice Mayor Attachment: 1. Proclamation COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑ Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note:Please write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted. .r°""" •a Approved. S e ngi omo, City Manager Attachment#1 VitO CPROCLAMATION OF THE UKIAH CITY COUNCIL in Recognition of Mr. Donald Rones Sr. WHEREAS, Mr. Rones was elected to Ukiah City Council in 1954 and served as Mayor from 1957-1959; and WHEREAS, Mr. Rones began his career with the City of Ukiah as a Junior Grip for the Parks and Recreation Department and made his way to serving as Mayor; and WHEREAS, Mr. Rones has graciously donated his time to our community as the 1954 President of the Chamber of Commerce, 1957-1958 Coastal Water Board Member, 1960-1968 Airport Commissioner, 1994-1996 Golf Course Committee Representative, 1996-2002 Member of the Parks and Recreation Commission, and the 1992-2016 Men's Golf Club Representative / Member-at-Large; and WHEREAS, much to the pleasure of all kids and adults alike Mr. Rones opened Rones Ice Cream and Candy Shop in 1952; and WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Rones Sr. has given to the community more than he has taken; and WHEREAS, he remains active in promoting meaningful recreation for youth and adults; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 2016, Mr. Donald Rones Sr. will be celebrating his centennial birthday; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, in recognition of Mr. Donald Rones Sr.'s centennial celebration and his many contributions to the citizens of the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley, we, the City Council of the City of Ukiah, hereby extend our gratitude and wish him a happy 100th birthday! Signed and sealed, this 19"day of October, in the year Two Thousand Sixteen. Stephen G.Scalmanini,.Mayor 4. .%.. ITEM NO.: 3b 19, October 2016 MEETING DATE: .... m City of'Ukiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT'S LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF UKIAH RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Summary: Staff will provide the latest status report on the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District's Litigation against the City of Ukiah related to the operation of the sanitary sewer system. The City of Ukiah continues to request that the District consider a change in process outside of litigation to resolve the dispute and restore a working relationship, recognizing there is simply too much at stake for the ratepayers, system operations, and the community. Background: In September 2013, the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District (UVSD) filed a claim for damages with the City, and one month later filed its lawsuit. In its lawsuit, the District seeks damages for alleged breaches of the various agreements between the City and the District related to the operation of the sanitary sewer system, starting with the original 1955 agreement. This lawsuit will have significant adverse financial impacts to both agencies, as well as the ratepayers and the community, and the City is seeking an alternative to litigation to resolve this dispute. Attached is the letter that was sent on September 14, 2016, by the City Council to the District Board, formally requesting that the District drop the lawsuit with terms that would allow the District to refile if agreement cannot be reached (Attachment #1), as well as an informational piece that details the background/impacts (Attachment#2). On September 21, 2016, the City Council received a presentation (Attachment #3) from staff that explained the relationship between the two agencies and provided responses to some of the most frequently asked questions about this matter to better inform the public about the consequences of the litigation. This information along with a video link to the September 21st presentation/discussion are accessible at ciofukiah.com/0 roipcts/uvpl ®vs®cOU/ . Continued on Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Receive status report. If desired, discuss and provide direction to Staff and/or consider any action(s) related to the matter. ALTERNATIVES: N/A Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: City Council (Councilmembers Crane and Doble) Prepared by: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager and Sean White, Director of Water and Sewer Coordinated with: David Rapport, City Attorney and Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works Presenters: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter to UVSD Board, September 14, 2016 2. Points of interest regarding UVSD vs. City of Ukiah 3. City PowerPoint Presentation from September 21, 2016 4. UVSD Letter dated September 20, 2016 5. Supplemental Memo dated October 5, 2016 regarding Item 3b COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑Approved U Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: U Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note:Please write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted, Approved: 5 a San•'-como, City Manager Page 2 of 2 The UVSD submitted a letter dated September 20, 2016 (Attachment#4) which inaccurately asserts that the City's request is for the District to drop the lawsuit until after the recycled water project funding is received. In fact, the City's request is for the District to dismiss its lawsuit and that the City and District devote their time, money and resources to solving the costly issues confronting the sewer system and improving their working relationship. The City's goal is to eliminate the lawsuit altogether. The City has offered to include terms that would allow the District to refile the lawsuit, if the parties fail to reach agreement, but the City never suggested that the District would simply refile the lawsuit once state funding was obtained. Also, the City never suggested that dismissing the lawsuit is all that would be necessary to obtain state funding. In addition to dismissal of the lawsuit, there would have to be an agreement between the City and the District regarding the recycled water project that would satisfy the State Water Resources Control Board. At the conclusion of the September 21st discussion, the Council directed the City Manager to contact the UVSD District Manager to explore possible alternatives. The City Manager attempted to contact the District Manager by email, but due to a reported medical leave, Mr. McMichael was not available to provide a timely/detailed response. On October 5, the City Attorney received an email correspondence from Duncan James (Attorney representing the District) responding to the City Manager's email to Mr. McMichael. Mr. James indicated in the email that the District had accepted the City's request to meet and formed a committee consisting of Frank McMichael, District Manager; Jim Ronco, Board Chair; Bob Page, Board Member; and, legal counsel. The City Manager issued a supplemental memo to the City Council for the October 5 City Council meeting regarding this email exchange and included a recommendation to Council for the formation of a City Council ad hoc committee to meet with the District (Attachment #5). At the City Council meeting, Mr. Doug Losak with the Law Offices of Duncan James delivered and read aloud a letter containing some additional allegations, but in the end, agreed to meet with the City. The City Council did form an ad hoc committee consisting of Councilmembers Crane and Brown. Efforts are currently underway to schedule the first meeting between the District's committee and the City's ad hoc. Discussion: Staff will provide the latest status report on the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District's Litigation against the City of Ukiah related to the operation of the sanitary sewer system. The Council may elect to discuss the matter further and, if desired, provide direction to Staff and/or consider any related action(s). As part of this agenda item, the Council does not intend to consult with legal counsel regarding the litigation itself and does not intend to waive evidentiary privileges for attorney- client communication or attorney work product. n�v,I0Itt 0(YA N emM��Mm�tt��r� ATTACHMENT 1 eM 1{, City of Ukiah 1 a,NM nr .... -s - ,,,,,,,�„„ uan/or,nt4MIV AMAIM 11116YM 116YmddYYm1V MUM,URI,IrNII h luoREM UM MEM Mil,NM VW September 14, 2016 Chairman Ronco and Board Members Board of Directors Ukiah Valley Sanitation District 151 Laws Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 SENT BY EMAIL AND REGULAR U.S. MAIL Re: UVSD v. City of Ukiah Dear Chairman Ronco and Board Members: The lawsuit filed by the District against the City is having immediate and serious adverse consequences affecting the sewer system and the ratepayers in the City and the District. As you know, the City was recently awarded $25,564,000 from the Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund (CWSRF) and $9,996,000 in grants from the Water Recycling Funding Program (WRFP) to construct Phases I- III of the Recycled Water Project. In addition, the City is in the process of applying for up to an additional $13,000,000 from the CWSRF and $7,000,000 from the WRFP for the final phase. For a phone call on April 18, 2016, between the City Attorney and Sergio Rudin, staff attorney with the Office of Chief Counsel, State Water Resources Control Board, Mr. Rudin sent the City Attorney a copy of the standard legal opinion that will be required before the Department of Water Resources will enter a loan agreement with the City. That opinion requires the City's legal counsel to state that"...there is no...suit...pending or threatened against or affecting the City's...wastewater system or the assets, properties or operations of the City relating to its...wastewater system which, if determined adversely to the City or its interests would result in any material change in the assets or financial condition of the City, the City's...wastewater system or the financial condition thereof" In a telephone conference call among City staff and officials in the Department of Water Resources on June 28, 2016, the Department staff raised the issue of the District's lawsuit and specifically advised City staff that the pendency of the lawsuit and the possibility of the District rescinding the Financing Agreement between the City and the District will prevent the Department from entering any loan agreements with the City. The City was advised that these funds will no longer be reserved for the City if the lawsuit is still pending and unresolved at the end of this year. This project is not a frivolous "feel-good" environmental program; it is,by far, the most cost-effective alternative to the State's stricter regulations on discharging to the Russian River. If we lose the loans and grants for the recycled water system, the City and District will need to upgrade the plant to comply with the new standards. Staff estimates compliance with current regulatory requirements will cost up to $30,000,000 in the short term, and will likely increase over time with escalating regulatory requirements if discharge to the river continues. It is important to note the treatment plant was modified less than a decade ago at a cost of$75,000,000 and is already"out of compliance" due to new regulatory requirements that did not exist until after the upgrade project was under construction in 2006. In addition, it is highly likely that no discharge whatsoever into the river will be allowed in the foreseeable IfotiMipitliNiluiR SurmunaMl7,mrvmaruvMruva!ixluvMmrmm�nmummtimVIM uuum„unu„umiMEM Vxr norm ar,�M,,m�smix�n nm r.....1...� vl � Ir tl 1mVMvuu MUPoP”uNrvmtmpmmmlMuximuuMnvmvuMlFWuuiMw'MmuvmuawiMmmMwMMIM rrltitmIMMnmMtWA WV V 10,100,,01,110.0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,V1=011n, 0,,NOM MMmuMrrntlMIfM0rmMmMriAYMiMVMPA PM 001,01=== .X X.000 VuuUluuumuuuuWON V.n N Mn n n06,11,1000021 xNM Mmmmm.....of 300 Seminary Avenue•Ukiah•CA•95452-5400 Phone: (707)463-6200° Fax: (707)463-6204~www,eityofukiah°eo future. These inevitable mandates will result in additional future costs that could be avoided by developing a recycling system now. Councilmembers have discussed the consequences of losing this funding with District board members in the past and we have also discussed the other financial impacts of this litigation on both the City and the District. To avoid these serious adverse financial impacts, the City proposes that the District dismiss its lawsuit and that the City and District devote their time, money and resources to solving the costly issues confronting the sewer system and improving their working relationship. The City Council and staff have been frustrated by the unresolved conflict between the City and the District,but also recognize that the current District Board feels strongly about its grievances. There are new faces at the City, including four new City Council members, a new City Manager, new Director of Water and Sewer and a new Finance Director who are prepared to address the District's concerns with an open mind, a commitment to honest and transparent communication and a desire to establish a productive long-term working relationship with the District. The City is prepared to engage in serious negotiations to address the District's concerns as long as the District Board is prepared to likewise negotiate in good faith and seriously consider the City's concerns. If necessary, the parties could agree on terms that would allow the District to refile its law suit in the future without prejudice, if the parties fail to reach agreement. As the last year has made clear,however, the parties cannot conduct this expensive, disruptive and time consuming litigation and at the same time work to resolve their disagreements, and the pending lawsuit has and threatens to further cost the ratepayers in the District and the City millions of dollars which will ultimately increase their rates for sewer service. Very truly yours, " ? Stephen G. Scalmanini, Mayor Ji 'e 0. Brown, Vice May. Doulas F. ',' ane, Counc'lmember o w e ' Doble, Coucilmember Maureen Mulheren, Councilmember cc: City Manager District General Manager 001011110.1111111IIIIW@,II )IIIIII,1111) ATTACHMENT 2 r IP 4 '1pppppp(((�J�J�J��� City of Ukiah IIII �,....,.,. uuu0,�llll1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111lllllllllllllllli Frequently Asked Questions: Ukiah Valley Sanitation District vs. City of Ukiah Why are there two government agencies for one wastewater treatment plant and collection system? Since 1897, the City of Ukiah has operated the municipal wastewater system. The system has expanded as demand and regulation necessitated collection and treatment upgrades. In 1950's, the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District was formed by the County to work in conjunction with the City of Ukiah to leverage the City's existing system to serve the area outside the city limits and eliminate the '�� y, 10•21,011,0!0R;000.0 0,1 need for duplicated facilities. ii/, f�i,, °oloo, ,n00,4 IIIIIII 1111111111 11101 000000000000000000000000000000000000010''N • ,, 't)10 4"70"-',„„i470,, In 1955,the City and the District entered the first agreement under which the City agreed to build a new 0," / �" sewer plant to serve the City and the District.The District i , 1 IllWrillagreed to construct a trunk sewer line from the treatment "' �I �, ,I w,r� Im+ » %� plant to serve both City and District territory.The City ` a x1 „ ,' ro agreed to operate and maintain the sewer plant, the trunk / ,, sewer and the pipelines and pump stations which collect IG,P sewage in the City and the District and transport it to the ,n 7,,. sewer plant for treatment.The agreement hada term of 40 "` " " ° "'" years. The original 1955 agreement was amended four times between 1955 and 1985. In 1995 the City and the District entered a new 30 year agreement,which has been amended twice. In 2006,the City and the District entered a Financing Agreement which set out the terms under which the City and the District would share the cost of repaying$75 Million the City borrowed to rebuild the sewage treatment plant.That money came from bonds issued for the City by the Association of Bay Area Governments. For roughly 60 years, the City has provided reliable sewer service to both City and District customers. Through a series of participation agreements,the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District utilizes City of Ukiah staff and resources for engineering, compliance, maintenance, administration and operation of the collection system and Wastewater Treatment Plant(WWTP).Throughout this period, the system was operated as a single operation with ratepayers within the City and District paying the same price for all services. The City is able to leverage administrative, labor, and equipment cost savings to the wastewater system fund by sharing costs with other city operations. For example,the City has a single billing and collections department that serves water, sewer, garbage collection and electric. In addition, the City has a consolidated field maintenance crew and fleet that serves both the water distribution system and wastewater collection system. What is the governance structure for the agencies? The City of Ukiah is governed by the City Council. The Ukiah Valley Sanitation District was originally governed by a three-member Board of Directors consisting of two members of the County's Board of Supervisors and one 111111/J/II/J/IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIII II II IIII II II ,,,,, 111111111II II II II II Illlllffllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll UlU11U11U11U11U11U11U11UDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUNNNittpOPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl UlU11U11U11U11U11U11UAlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lllllllllllllllllllllllllll11h11h11h11h11h11h111111011111111111111111111111111WIWIWIWIWIWIWIWIWIWI�I�III10111111111h11h11h11h11h11h1AlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILWIWIWIWIWIWIWIWIWI 300 Seminary Avenue • Ukiah • CA • 95482-5400 Updated: 9/14/16 Phone: (707)463-6200 - Fax: (707)463-6204 -www.cityofukiah.com member of the Ukiah City Council. In 2008,the District modified its governance structure to a directly elected five member Board of Directors. Since the change in governance and the original election for Directors, incumbents have run unopposed and new members have been appointed by the existing board to fill vacated seats without an election. After 2008,the District began to adopt rates and connection fees that are different than the City's and has made a number of other decisions that will ultimately result in increased sewer rates for everyone with no compensating benefits to ratepayers in the City or the District. How have operations changed at the District since the change in governance structure? Since 2008, the District has increased its administrative costs from just under$6,000 in 2008 to more than $290,000 per year. Additionally,the District has elected to impose different rates and connection fees than are charged by the City,to the detriment of business development and new housing. For example, Branches Restaurant, located in the UVSD, paid $75,537 to the District in sewer connection fees. Under the revised fee schedule, adopted in 2011, those fees would be$196,700. A dialysis clinic in the District paid $67,983 in connection fees in 2010; under the new schedule, their fees would be$105,170. An expansion of Star's Restaurant was abandoned because of the increased fees. Their proposed banquet room, which did not include any new plumbing, would have triggered sewer connection fees of$1,224 per seat. Other new developments have also been abandoned because of the prohibitive fee structure. A new laundromat in the District, which would likely serve the lowest income population,would be required to pay$24,540 per washing machine, versus$2,500 in the City. Without new connections, the existing ratepayers pay the burden of under-utilized capacity upgrades. Also, the application of different rates increases the costs of administration. Why is the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District suing the City of Ukiah? In September 2013, the District filed a claim for damages with the City and one month later filed its lawsuit in October 2013. In its lawsuit, the District seeks damages for alleged breaches of the various versions of the agreements between the City and the District, starting with the original 1955 agreement.The District alleges that the City overcharged the District under the 1966 amendment to the 1955 agreement. It claims that the City overcharged the District under the 1985 amendment to the 1955 agreement. It makes similar claims under the 1995 agreement and its two amendments.The District also seeks to get out of the Financing Agreement which obligates the District to pay its share of the cost to rebuild the sewer plant. Bonds were issued by ABAG in 2006 in reliance on that agreement.The bonds were insured and the insurance company likewise relied on the District's commitments in the Financing Agreement, when it insured the bonds in 2006.The bondholders relied on the District's commitment, when they purchased the bonds.The sewer plant reconstruction was completed in 2009, and, of course, serves both the City and the District. The District's decision to allege contract breaches covering more than 50 years and multiple agreements, some of which expired 21 years ago, make the lawsuit a nightmare to litigate.The current City officials and staff believe that the facts alleged by the District establish a course of )0006 dealing over many years between the City and the L1,110,011 , District's Board of Directors during which the District 1111111011111m V111111111�rN '74 11111 I is rwu�� Board knew how the City was performing under the r prnv„ Ho. agreements, because the City provided that information 11 0,1p1001141111111 through staff reports and appearances before the Board, vG;UK " the submission to and approval by the Board of annual budgets for the sewer system, annual audits of the City's financial statements and joint meetings of the Board and the City Council. However, reconstructing those interactions over this extended time period, challenges the memories of the participants who are still alive and who rrr „r„ 1 "'„ can be located and involves hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions of pages of documents and many others that have been destroyed in the regular course of business or can't be located. The City anticipates that if this case goes to trial, expensive accounting and engineering expert witnesses will express conflicting opinions as Monday night quarterbacks rehashing and characterizing the long and complicated history of City/District relations. In addition, in its complaint, the District asks the court to turn over operation of the entire wastewater system, including the City's wastewater treatment plant, to the District to run, in spite of the fact that the City has been operating and maintaining the entire sewer system for nearly 120 years.The District has never operated a sewer system; nor does it have any of the equipment, field attendants, licensed plant operators, engineers or customer service staff necessary to do so.The District has not described to the City how it would take over these functions and perform them in compliance with the stringent and ever-changing regulations enforced by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. Furthermore, no allegations in the District's lawsuit address the City's actual operation of the sewer plant or the collection system or suggest that the City is not doing an effective job of operating the sewer system. How much is the lawsuit costing the ratepayers? The District's lawsuit will cost the District and the City millions of dollars in combined legal fees and related expenses. In the last three and a half years, the District has spent$2,183,634 on litigation-related expenses with $2,112,500 paid to the Law Offices of Duncan James through June 9, 2016. Recent monthly invoices from the law firm have exceeded $80,000 per billing. In the same period of time,the City has expended $318,093 in defense of the lawsuit. Unless the District drops the lawsuit, it will most likely drag on for a year or more with long-standing implications for the Ukiah Valley. Unfortunately,the cost of the lawsuit will be borne by the ratepayers,who will undoubtedly see significant increases on their monthly bills and/or a negitive impact on services. What else is at stake because of the lawsuit? Interest rates are low and financial experts predict that they will be rising soon. It would be most prudent to take advantage of the current low interest rates and refinance the$75 million in bonds that were issued to construct the new wastewater treatment plant in 2006. Refinancing would save up to an estimated $7.48 million dollars (present day value). However, by filing this lawsuit, the District has effectively blocked any possibility of a refinance. Additionally, in its lawsuit, the District is seeking to rescind the Financing Agreement by which the District agreed to pay its share of the debt service on the 2006 wastewater treatment plant bonds. In addition to the lost opportunity to refinance, the impact from seeking this remedy, even if it is ultimately denied, could be seriously damaging to both the District and the City's credit rating, thereby jeopardizing future projects for both agencies. For example, the City was recently awarded $25,564,000 from the Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund (CWSRF) and $9,996,000 in grants from the Water Recycling Funding Program (WRFP) to o �� ,III'HI, ` � � II construct Phases I—Ill of the Recycled Water II, 01,141 oil ir d I 410 4010 v40 0 I Project. In addition,the City is in the process of 440')0411004 applying for up to an additional $13,000,000 from 0, r r �a ,�h the CWSRF and $7,000,000 from the WRFP for the r� t (111 1 ` final phase. ' 10 , ';,rJ,� � i r^ r r�ir � r1( 11011,1 t iW 11 ,11' /`fu � Ai P r� ii ,� 1 �, This project is not a frivolous "feel-good" /A� � , „'/��r , program, �, environmental it is the most cost- effective alternative to the State's stricter regulations on discharging to the Russian River. 4 ; �P gig .� iii However, the State of California has informed CityVii' ; � �I W k1+I� - ���n ����l�� staff that the recycled water project funding is in ° ° ° ° n °r� »r»”, ,r»n,- °° °°°°� jeopardy because the state cannot enter a loan agreement with the City,while the District's lawsuit is pending. If we lose the loans and grants for the recycled water system, the City and District will need to upgrade the plant to comply with the new standards. Staff estimates compliance with current regulatory requirements will cost up to$30,000,000 in the short term, and will likely increase over time with escalating regulatory requirements if discharge continues. It is important to note the treatment plant was modified only a decade ago at a cost of $75,000,000 and is already"out of compliance." In addition, it is highly likely that no discharge whatsoever into the river will be allowed in the foreseeable future. These inevitable mandates will result in additional future costs that could be avoided by developing a recycling system now.This is why our neighbors to the south including Santa Rosa, Windsor, and Healdsburg have already developed recycling programs. From a practical standpoint we have two choices: 1) spend millions to throw away a valuable resource, or 2) spend millions to put it to use in our own community. Finally,the City has expensed a tremendous amount of staff resources responding to the District's Public Record Act (PRA) requests for information dating back to 1955. To date, the City has received 26 PRAs, some of which include multiple demands on a single request. Some examples of these requests include every building permit issued by the City since 1955, payroll records and time cards for each employee whose time was charged to the sewer system from 1984-2016, and all correspondence that at any time refers or relates in any way to the sewer system. In a typical lawsuit,the discovery process is used to obtain documents and is overseen and controlled by the court to prevent burdensome or oppressive requests. However, because the City of Ukiah is a public agency, the District's attorneys have used the Public Records Act to obtain information, which does not require the District to justify its requests by showing how they are relevant to the issues in the case. How does the City propose to resolve this matter? The City proposes that the District dismiss its lawsuit and that the City and District devote their time, money and resources to solving the costly issues confronting the sewer system and improving their working relationship.The City Council and City staff have been frustrated by the unresolved conflict between the City and the District, but also recognize that the current District Board feels strongly about its grievances.The City is prepared to engage in serious negotiations to address the District's concerns as long as the District Board is prepared to likewise negotiate in good faith and seriously consider the City's concerns. If necessary, the parties could agree on terms that would allow the District to refile its lawsuit in the future, if the parties fail to reach agreement. As the last year has made clear, however, the parties cannot simultaneously conduct this litigation and work to resolve their disagreements, and the pending lawsuit has and threatens to further cost the ratepayers in the District and the City millions of dollars which will ultimately impact their rates for sewer service. Summary • The Ukiah Valley Sanitation District has no facility operators, maintenance staff, or billing and collection staff. All of these functions are handled by the City of Ukiah on behalf of the two agencies. • The District and the City charged the same connection fees and rates to their customers until 2011, when the District adopted a new fee schedule. Connection fees in the District are often many times higher in the District than in the City, which has been a barrier to development. • The District's administration costs have gone from $6,000 to over$290,000 per year. • In the last three and a half years, the District has spent $2,183,634 on litigation-related expenses with $2,112,500 paid to the Law Offices of Duncan James through June 9, 2016. Recent monthly invoices from the law firm have exceeded $80,000 per billing. In the same period of time, the City has expended $318,093 in defense of the lawsuit. • With today's low interest rates, the City and the District could save up to an estimated $7.48 million dollars (present day value) by refinancing the $75 million in bonds that were issued to construct the new wastewater treatment plant in 2006. However, by filing this lawsuit, the District has effectively blocked any possibility of a refinance. • With the pending lawsuit from the District, the City stands to lose over$35 million in funds for the recycled water project for Phases I-Ill and will not be eligible to apply for an additional $20 million for Phase IV. If we lose the loans and grants for the recycled water system, the City and District will need to upgrade the plant to comply with the new standards. Staff estimates compliance with current regulatory requirements will cost up $30 million in the short term, and will likely increase over time with escalating regulatory requirements if discharge continues. Additional background and support documents are available at: haps...//coty..c?.uY<iah..k2ax cau.nL Lu.. d.22u.rLaFint .. t 1101h01111iuuwu i V 1 �OOOVMOuuoutWlMluMumum��nmouuumopmiiMumuuuml�piippp0 �, �\i ., r � uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuu uuu „....... 1955: 2006: City and 1897: District City and agree to District agree City build new to share cost develops sewer of new sewer wastewater treatment treatment system plant plant /1111'11'1'1,1111111111,11,11,111,11111:11,11„I it,,,,1,0000001„1„111 ,,,00000001111 /0,1.000011 111111111111111111111 Noppoo 111111,11111 voloo II Ili ilsomploollil 4'10110,111,1111,1 11111111111111111111111111111 1,1100:00111,111,111,111,111,111,1111,11111 1 111 1 0111111 1111111101 �� .e 1950's: 1995: 2013: W W� Ukiah Valley City and District Sanitation District files District enter into lawsuit formed new against the agreement City uui uui jtl......." in....... uui „„, W y a 7 a 7 w 7 a ,,,,, in....... uui i in....... uui uuu uu uuu uum IIIIIrrrr „„, One treatment plant serves customers both inside and outside the city limits City Council / UVSD Board of Directors umi uu uuu um „„, a „„, rr I"I'III I"I'IIIrrrr uum uu uuuuuuuu ▪ Sewer Treatment Plant ▪ Admin oversight ▪ Operators ▪ 2 Part time staff ▪ Maintenance crews ▪ Equipment ▪ Billing ▪ Customer service ▪ Engineers • Permitting • 16 FTEs 111111111111uminnum uminnum uminnum uminnum 00 um „„, „„, 1011 , ns , „„111„1 !y uuuuuum m .uuu Hun All customers paid the same from 1955 until 2011 Some District customers live in the city limits (overlap area) umi uu uuuumu uuu n....... uui uuu uui rr uuuuuuuu' rr uum The District claims that the City breached the various agreements over the last 50 years and owes the District millions of dollars. The District is asking that the City turn over operation of the entire wastewater system , including the treatment plant, to the District. Result in duplicity No staff to execute this demand W 72, 1 ay 7 $2 . 1 million in legal fees paid to the Law Offices of Duncan James by the District $318K in legal fees paid by the City $7.5 million lost to inability to refinance bonds $55 million in grants and low-interest loans for recycled water project $30 million in additional infrastructure Rate increases in both the City and the District uu umi uu uuu uu ly a Put the attorneys on hold and mediate with Staff and Board/Council members Work to resolve issues in an open , transparent manner instead of litigating behind closed doors If all attempts fail , the District can resume with suit later Litigation should be a last resort Wuu uu uu in....... um mIIt:irr uum 72, 1 ay b Existing debt can be refinanced saving $7.5 million Both agencies can benefit from $55 million in grants and low-interest loans for the recycled water project Avoid $30 million in infrastructure Millions in legal fees can be avoided Eliminate opportunity for creating duplicity UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT ATTACHMENT 4 FRANK MCMICHAEL 151 Laws Avenue WEB SITE District Manager/Clerk Ukiah,California 95482 www.uvsd.org TELEPHONE AND FAX:(707)462 4429 EMAIL ADDRESS:DM@UVSD.ORG September 20, 2016 Honorable Mayor Stephen G. Scalmanini and Council Members City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah CA 95482 Re: Ukiah Valley Sanitation District v. City of Ukiah Dear Honorable Mayor Scalmanini and Council Members: In response to your correspondence to this board dated September 14, 2016, we have instructed our attorney to deliver to you the enclosed correspondence of date even herewith. I14111Presi / tit /it A / %re' tiri ' Aest- T es Ronco fir , ,..._ ., 0 t" nir 4. 111 r)14 Robert ge. Vice Chair Theresa cnerlin Director LI ! , Kenneth Marshall Travis F• ester Director Director BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROBERT PAGE JAMES RONCO KENNETH MARSHALL DIRECTOR CHAIR VICE-CHAIR TRAVIS FORRESTER THERESA MCNERLIN DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DUNCAN M.JAMES LAW OFFICE OF DUNCAN M. JAMES DONALD J.MCMULLEN LAMBS INN CHRISTOPHER L.BROOKE P.O.BOX 1381 K.J. FLAVETTA 445 NORTH STATE STREET DOUGLAS L.LOSAK UKIAH,CALIFORNIA 95482 FAX (707)468-0453 GINEVRA K.CHANDLER (707)468-9271 lawoffice@duncanjame&eom OF df0. Received September 20, 2016 SEP 2 16 P 1 ' Honorable Mayor Stephen G. Scalmanini and Council Members Hand Delivered and City of Ukiah by email 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah CA 95482 Re: Ukiah Valley Sanitation District v. City of Ukiah Dear Honorable Mayor Scalmanini and Council Members: Our apologies for the delay in responding to your letter dated September 14, 2016. The Ukiah Valley Sanitation District("District")board needed to review and approve the mailing of this letter since it relates to pending litigation. Let me begin by noting that there is substantial background and other detail in this letter because the City of Ukiah("City") has three (3) relatively new council members who may not be aware of critical details that impact the litigation. Further, since the underlying issues in the lawsuit impact the so-called Purple Water project, it is our belief that the matter cannot be addressed properly absent reference to, and an understanding of,those underlying issues. The City requests the District dismiss the lawsuit, which, it should be noted, includes the City's recent counter-lawsuit against the District. The City states that the District's lawsuit should be dismissed because the state will not issue loans for the Purple Water project with that action pending. In this regard, I note that the request to dismiss the lawsuit so the state's concerns are alleviated, subject to the offered side agreement that would allow the District to simply re-file suit after the City receives loan funds, seems to me to border on fraud. In short,it would condone the City's misrepresentation to the state that a claim or lawsuit against the City does not exist. Consequently,the District will not participate in such activity, which would necessarily include substantial conditions, absent assurances from the state that it fords such conduct acceptable. Background The City and District operate as a joint venture of sorts. Under agreements in place for decades,the City owns the treatment facility and is for the most part charged with operating and maintaining the entire sewer system, including that portion of the system in the District's jurisdiction,which includes a portion of property within the City's city limits known as the Overlap Area. Properties within both parties'jurisdictions place effluent, or waste, into the system, which requires treatment. One central design of the agreements was to allocate, or divide,the operating and maintenance costs for the sewer system between the parties. For simplicity,we'll City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 2 refer to that as O&M'. Basically,the idea is that each party pay O&M in proportion to the amount of effluent that party's properties place into the system. Determining the amount of effluent placed into the system is not an easy task. Of course, properties connected to the system discharge effluent into it. But,there are no (or very few) installed meters that calculate the discharge into the system from each property. Over time,the parties' agreements handled this issue differently. Before 1985,the agreements were designed to allocate O&M based on the number of connections within each party's jurisdiction. In short, if a property was physically hooked into the system, it counted as one connection. Thus, if the District had 45% and the City 55% of the total connections,then O&M would be paid by each party corresponding to that percentage.2 Pretty simple. However, allocating O&M based on connections is problematic; it doesn't come close to measuring the amount of waste a property discharges into the system. For example, the amount of waste a 2 bedroom, 1 bath,house typically places into the system is quite different from the amount placed into the system by a restaurant(think: sinks, dishwashing, bathrooms, and numerous employees and patrons all using its facilities on a daily basis). The issue is exacerbated when considering differences in user type. A brewery, for instance, discharges a far greater amount of solids down its drains than does a typical single-family dwelling;thus,the brewery's discharge requires more treatment. To address these problems, beginning in 1985 the City and District agreed to allocate O&M based on Equivalent Sewer Service Units ("ESSUs"), within each party's jurisdiction. (4th Supp. Agmt., 2/6/1985,pp. 1-2, § 1.) The concept was to establish a central standard by which all connected parcels, irrespective of type, could be fairly measured. Therefore, one ESSU was considered to be the equivalent amount of waste characteristically discharged by a single-family dwelling. But, again, there are no meters currently installed to measure discharge. To handle that problem, formulas were developed (or, at least were supposed to be developed)to approximate a connected-user's discharge by reference to the amount of water--which is metered--consumed by a property.3 Since the concept was to measure this use by reference to a standard--a single- This more broadly includes "annual costs for treatment,including maintenance,operation,administration, repair and replacement,expansion,upgrading, debt service, insurance and financial services of the entire sewer system(treatment plant,trunk sewer, and collection system)." (Amend. 1 to Part.Agmt,p. 1,2nd full¶.)This language deviated somewhat between agreements. (See,4th Supp.Agmt.,2/6/1985,p. 1, § 1;Part.Agmt., 7/19/1995,p. 1, § 1.) 2 For the sake of practicality,the City projected each party's connections from 1967 through 1984. (3rd Supp. Agmt., 12/14/1966,p. 1, §2.) The agreement provided that if the actual ratio deviated from the projected ratio by more than 10%in any given year,then the percentage allocation of O&M would be adjusted accordingly. (Id.,p.2, §2.) As discussed below,that didn't happen. 3 Of course,not all water used by a property enters the sewer system. Again,these are approximations. But, that fact was considered and addressed.For example,property owners use metered water to irrigate. Irrigated water does not discharge from the property into the sewer system. Then again,property owners typically don't irrigate in the winter. Considering that,only metered water use during winter months is applied to determine a property's discharge. City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 3 family dwelling--it was necessary to establish the amount of water typically consumed by such a property. With some deviation,that amount was established at 250 gallons per day(GPD). Of course, establishing that standard did not address the differences in type of user, and thus type of waste, discharged into the system. To address that issue, formulas were developed to equate the standard one ESSU with water consumption or some other methodology depending on the type of connected user(e.g. different methods are applied for restaurants as opposed to office buildings or light industrial). Application -Expense & Revenue Allocation Although technically a separate entity,until 2008/2009 the District's board was comprised of two (2)members of the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors, one of whom was always the supervisor of the district in which the City lies,plus one Ukiah City Council member. In fact,until about 2004,the District had no employees , and today the District only has a part-time manager and staff Historically,there was little need for employees given the City's obligation to provide all system-related personnel. (See Supp. Agmt., 10/20/1958,p. 1, § 11.) This led to problems. The City was and is responsible for actually operating the system and undertaking system maintenance and repair. (See, e.g., Part. Agmt.,p. 2, § 9.) It was and is also charged with allocating system expenditures and, thus, determining the number of connections or ESSUs, as the case may be, within each party's jurisdictional boundaries. The City was and is also tasked with collecting revenue from all system ratepayers--both those within the City and those within District territory. As far back as 1958 the City agreed to "maintain complete records and account relating to [system] costs and expenditures...in connection with [the system] and of all sewer...revenues...." (Supp. Agmt., 10/20/1958,p. 2, § 18; see also,Part. Agmt., 7/19/1995,p. 3, § 13 [same].) Indeed,the City was and is still "the paying and receiving agent for all District operation and maintenance funds." (Part. Agmt., p. 1, § 1.) In theory,payments by ratepayers within the City's jurisdiction(excluding the Over-lap area) are placed into one bucket(for simplicity, "City Bucket") and revenue sourced from the District's jurisdiction(including the Over-lap area) is placed into another bucket("District Bucket"). From there,the City pays the entire sewer system's O&M based on the allocation that it determines. However, as far back as 1966,the City did not properly count and adjust the number of connections within each party's jurisdiction. As noted in footnote two, in 1966 the City projected the proportionate number of connections for the years 1967 through 1984. The projections served as a baseline of sorts. If,in any given year, the actual number of connections deviated from those baseline projections by more than 10%,the City was required to adjust the allocation based on the number of actual connections. For eighteen(18) years (1967-1985) it didn't. Consequently,the District was overcharged. Then,beginning in 1985, the City was responsible for allocating O&M based on ESSUs. This continued with the parties' 1995 Participation Agreement. Again,this annual allocation was based on the ratio of ESSUs each party had within its jurisdiction to the system-wide ESSU City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 4 count. That count was simply the ESSUs "on record as of March 31 each year." (4th Supp. Agmt., 2/6/1985, p. 2, § 1, last¶; Part. Agmt., 7/19/1995,p. 1, § 1, last line.) As was its responsibility,the City kept and determined that record. However,the City's reported ESSUs vary from its annual internal ESSU documentation, which shows the total of all ESSUs added to the system each year. It further differs from the actual ESSUs subscribed to a property in building permits. What's more,the City wrongly charged the District a variety of costs, ostensibly as O&M. By way of illustration,the City improperly charged the District for: depreciation on "District lines and equipment," as well as a City "utility plant charge"; and, a percentage of the City's "General Government Services." In short, the City treated District revenue as a slush fund to supplement its ever-growing institutional overhead. As an aside,these issues must be addressed and corrected now. Not only has the District been damaged historically, but absent correction, the future harm, even in the near term,will be substantial. And,the proposed Purple Water project, discussed below,will only exacerbate the problem if these issues are left unabated. The discussion above in this section relates mainly to system expenses. We now turn to revenue . Here, too,misallocations persist. Remember,the City is the collection agent for the District, and this is a relatively simple issue. The key inquiry is to simply determine the jurisdiction in which a given property is physically situated; revenue sourced from City properties should be placed in the City Bucket and revenue from District properties should be placed in the District Bucket. For whatever reason,that has not happened. A couple examples illustrate the point. The Brookside Retirement Residences are located in the District's jurisdiction. Revenue generated from that property has been collected by the City in accordance with the agreements. However,that revenue has been placed in the City's Bucket. The City admitted the error and promised to correct it. (Newell (City) email, 11/23/2011). According to District records, it appears that didn't happen. Likewise,the City itself admitted that revenue from 44 District parcels were improperly deposited into the City Bucket. (UVSD Min., 6/19/2012,p. 2,middle.) Yet, despite all this and the District's requests to correct the problems,the City has refused to do so. The District has been given no reason for the City's actions and,more importantly, refusal to correct the problems. Rather,the City is steadfastly silent and unwilling to act on the matter. The Capacity and Rehabilitation/Upgrade Projects By the early 2000's the existing treatment plant was dated and exceeded capacity. The City was under a moratorium because it exceeded plant capacity of 9,800 ESSUs. As a temporary fix,the City was allowed to implement a chemical enhancement program(CEPT)to treat effluent until the remodeled plant went on line. During that time, environmental laws tightened regarding allowable nitrate and ammonia levels present in treated water discharged by the plant into the Russian River. The parties entered an agreement to undertake a project to address these problems. City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 5 The 2004 agreement articulates two parts to the "Project": (1)the "Capacity Project"; and, (2)the "Upgrade/Rehabilitation Project". (Amend. 2 to Part. Agmt., 12/15/2004.) As the names imply,the Capacity Project was designed to increase the treatment plant capacity--the ability to treat additional waste--and the Upgrade Project was designed to upgrade and rehabilitate the existing plant. (Id.,p. 2, item 7.) The agreement also broke down responsibility for Project costs. Regarding the Upgrade/Rehabilitation Project,the cost sharing term is straightforward: allocation of these costs is based on the annual ratio of ESSUs between the parties, commencing the year in which the costs are first incurred. The idea here was to track the Participation Agreement. (Amend. 2 to Part. Agmt., 12/15/2004,p. 3, § 2.2.) The agreement for the Capacity Project costs, on the other hand, was not a model of clarity. Obviously, it was necessary to determine the ratio of the anticipated increased capacity that each party would consume. Initially, an estimate was generated by reference to the ratio of ESSUs the City and District would each need through 2020. That ratio was established as 65% District and 35% City (Amend. 2 to Part. Agmt., 12/15/2004,p. 3, § 2.2.). The ratio serves as a baseline of sorts. Actual allocation of Capacity Project costs was to be reviewed annually, commencing 12 months after the Project was completed.4 (Ibid.) Here is where it gets jumbled. The annual adjustment of that baseline ratio--which again, was grounded in ESSUs--is to be based on the "actual proportion of new connections in the City and the District.i5 (Ibid., emphasis added.) As discussed above, connections and ESSUs are not the same. They are more or less the proverbial apples and oranges. Therefore, adjusting an allocation grounded in ESSUs by virtue of changes in connections presents difficulties. In any event,the City's own internal documents demonstrate it has never adjusted the allocation since 2004. This, despite the fact its own records show the need. Even assuming the City has been correctly calculating ESSUs in the first instance, according to the City's own building permits, ESSU reports, and ESSU worksheets,there have been additions and changes to ESSUs and connections that necessitate reallocation. There are other problems with the Project allocation. As noted above,the initial, or baseline,ESSU distributions (65%/35%) were generated based on representations made by the City, as would be expected. Recall that the City was the District's agent, maintaining all books and records and, in that role, was necessarily responsible for calculating connections and ESSUs for the entire system and then allocating costs and revenue. In formulating the agreement,the City represented that historical connections data suggested a divide of 77%District and 23% City. However,based on City documents,the District later learned that the ratio of system ESSUs was never more than 47%. In other words,the underlying basis for the Project cost 4 The Project was not completed until approximately 2009. 5 The agreement goes on to provide that the annual adjustment should take"into account the number of new service connections within each party during the previous twelve months,the total number of new connections within each party's jurisdiction since [12/15/2004],the likely number of new connections in the next one,three and five year time periods, any changes in organization,including annexations and detachments...and any other facts or conditions the Parties consider relevant." (Amend.2 to Part.Agmt., 12/15/2004,p. 3, §2.2.) City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 6 allocation was false and does not reflect reality. Despite that,the City has refused to properly adjust the allocation. Again,these issues must be addressed and corrected now or the District will continue paying more than required or agreed. After all,the City is in control of the District's checkbook, so to speak. In addition to the historical damage caused by over allocation of these expenses to the District,the future harm the District will suffer absent correction is substantial. This includes the Purple Water project. The City Refuses to Give the District Its Own Revenue We discussed above the fact that District revenue has been improperly deposited into the City Bucket. But,there is an additional revenue issue that must be addressed--the District's net revenue currently being held by the City. This is how it breaks down. As noted above,the City collects revenue for the entire system. City property revenue goes into the City Bucket and District property revenue goes to the District Bucket. From there, O&M and Project expenses are paid by the City from each bucket according to the allocation determined by the City.6 The balance left in each bucket constitutes net revenue. The District has sought an accounting of its bucket,but the City has refused. In this vein, it may be recalled that the City is the District's "paying and receiving agent," making the District the principal party. There is no sound legal basis for an agent to deny its principal an accounting under these circumstances. In any event,the District has discovered that the City holds millions of dollars in District revenue. This figure is sourced from the City's own financial statements,namely a statement of what it calls "Fiduciary Funds." According to an independent audit,the amount due to District on June 30, 2014, over two years ago, is $6,999,374. (See, e.g., City of Ukiah Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position, Fiduciary Funds, 6/30/2014, attached as Exhibit# 1.) Despite the District's requests,the City refuses to give the District its own net revenue. The City offered a number of reasons over time,but the central one is simply that it can't. The reasoning is without justification and flies in the face of its own conduct. The City's position is grounded in what are known as the Installment Agreement and Financing Agreement. The Installment Agreement was entered into on March 1,2006,by the City,the Association of Bay Area Governments ("ABAG"), and Wells Fargo bank. The District was not a party to it. In short,the Installment Agreement memorialized the transaction by which the City obtained and agreed to repay$75 million in bond financing for the Project. The document states that the City pledged the entire sewer system's net revenue as security. (Inst. Agmt., 3/1/2006,p. 1, item 4 &p. 12, § 4.5 (a)-(d).) As will later be seen,this becomes important when we address purple water issues. 6 See Financing Agreement,3/2/2006,regarding Project-bond expense obligations. It is also discussed below. City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 7 However,the Installment Agreement also expressly allows use of the net revenue for "any [] lawful purposes," so long as no "Event of Default" has occurred. There has been no Event of Default. In fact,the District specifically asked the City for any information or materials related to such an event, and the City provided none. Additionally,the Installment Agreement allows the City to at any time deposit revenue, including net revenue, in a "rate stabilization" fund for purposes of stabilizing sewer rates imposed by the City. What's more,the City is permitted to "at any time [] withdraw any or all amounts on deposit in the Rate Stabilization Fund...for any [] lawful purposes of the City." (Inst. Agmt.,p. 13, § 4.6) Again,the District was not a party to the Installment Agreement. That said, on March 2, 2006,the District and City entered into the Financing Agreement. At this juncture, it may be recalled that the parties had agreed in 2004 to allocate Project costs; and,the bonds constitute such a cost. (Amend. 2 to Part. Agmt., 12/15/2004; Inst. Agmt, 3/1/2006,p. 5, "Project".) The purpose of the Financing Agreement was to ensure the District established rates sufficient to enable it to pay its share of Project costs and,thus,to secure the financing costs allocated to the District under the Participation Agreement, as amended. The security was given "in the same manner in which the City's allocable share...is secured under the Installment Agreement. (See Fin. Agmt., 3/2/2006,p. 1, items 2-6.) In other words,the District is permitted to handle that portion of its revenue that exceeds expenses and the reserve required by the Finance Agreement; and,most certainly,the its is permitted to use such revenue for any lawful purposes of the District, including establishing its own rate stabilization fund,which would benefit its ratepayers. In October 2013,the City released$2,871,814.49 to the District from a rate stabilization fund. With no further progress over the intervening couple years, in November 2015,the District filed a motion with the court to, in part, force the City to release the funds. Ultimately,the City agreed to give the District$1,500,000 of the funds now, with the District preserving its right to pursue the balance of its net revenues if the matter could not be informally resolved. It remains a looming issue in the case. Despite all that,the City refuses to release the balance of the District's money. As discussed above,this position is not justified. It also belies the City's own conduct. The City holds millions of dollars in District money, including net revenue. As noted above, as of June 2014,the figure was at approximately$7,000,000 according to the City's own statements. These monies are sourced from District properties. All O&M and Project payments allocated to the District(even those improperly allocated),have been paid from District revenues. Indeed, over the last several years, District revenue generated an ample surplus;thus, the millions of dollars of District net revenue that is being held by the City. Pre and Pending Lawsuit Efforts to Resolve Issues As noted above, only since 2009 has the District been independently run. Unlike its predecessors,that independent board did not wear "two hats." Its focus and duty was not divided. The District,in light of the agreements, continued to rely on the City as its agent, but discrepancies with the City's accounting, at first insignificant,began coming to light. When questions were raised, answers were either not forthcoming or simply could not be provided. Promises to correct misallocations were never carried out. Something was off. The District undertook an investigation. And,that investigation revealed much of what is discussed above. The wrongs needed to be addressed. City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 8 From even before the District's lawsuit was filed,the District was willing to make efforts with the City to resolve the issues underlying this litigation on mutually agreeable terms. For example, on September 6, 2013,the District's counsel, Duncan M. James,provided the City's attorney with a draft copy of the District's proposed complaint. In the cover letter accompanying that draft,Mr. James stated in part: "The DISTRICT is willing to meet and confer and reach a resolution of this matter without the formality of the Complaint being filed if the CITY demonstrates a similar willingness. If that is to be agreed upon, one condition of the agreement would be a waiver of any potential statutes of limitations (and similar legal and equitable defenses based on timing)that might run during the course of our attempts to resolve the matter. [If] [...] In the event I do not have an agreement in place on or before October 4, 2013, between the CITY and DISTRICT to attempt to resolve the matter, then I have been instructed by the DISTRICT Board to file the Complaint." Not only did the City fail to agree to the proposal to waive timing defenses "that might run during the course of our attempts to resolve the matter,"there was total silence on the City's part. Therefore, it was necessary for the District to formally take action in the form of a lawsuit. After the lawsuit was filed by the District,mediation was suggested. The City ultimately agreed to mediation in late December 2013. The mediation did not begin until August 13, 2014. In an effort to be as transparent as possible prior to mediation, on June 18, 2014, the District provided the City,through its attorney, a flash drive containing a copy of every related document the District had located up to that point in time. That included approximately 38,000 pages of material, Bates stamped: ESSU 001-0025; UVSD 3000-36,769; and, UKCC0001-4955. It was a one-sided gesture; the City did not similarly respond.? As an aside,the only additional documents the District has been able to obtain is what little material has been disclosed by the City in response to the District's information requests through discovery or Public Records Act Requests processes, some materials sourced from third-party subpoena efforts with which the City was copied, or what is posted online. Even obtaining City responses to formal discovery or Public Record Act Requests has presented a unnecessary battle; for example,the District served requests for documents in March 2016 and has yet to receive complete responses. Even the most basic requests have gone unanswered(e.g. information and material showing how the City determined the ESSU calculations). Absent compliance,the District is left with no choice but to take action to compel compliance. This will only unnecessarily drive up costs, in our view. Mediation took place on August 13-14 and November 12, 2014. During mediation it was the District's belief that significant progress toward settlement had occurred. Eventually,the mediator (Judge Wm. Bettinelli) sent us home with a recommendation that the City put their offer in writing to enable a formal written response by the District. In the meantime,the lawsuit was placed on hold. The City only provided a few documents related to the nitrate issue. City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 9 The District did not receive the City's formal written settlement offer,which was dated January 16, 2015,until January 20, 2015. Further, the offer was amended in part on March 12, 2015. After reviewing the offer,the District concluded that, if it agreed to the proposed terms, it would have been placed in an even worse position. With that,the District was left with no choice but to pursue its claims. Up to this point in time,the City has showed little willingness to address the core issues. It appears--based on all legal maneuvering to date--that the City seeks to escape its wrongs by relying on technical defenses, such as the statute of limitations. As an aside, even if successful, such a defense would only go back so far, leaving open claims spanning the last near decade in the very least,not to mention the future. Further,the court already once rejected the City's efforts in this regard. In our view,this is a poor maneuver in matters involving public trust. Further,the City appealed the trial judge's ruling against it involving the City's effort to detach(basically, swallow),the District's Overlap Area. Detachment, if appropriate,must proceed through Mendocino LAFCO, and as far as the District is aware,there are no such detachment proceedings in process with LAFCO. This begs the question: why is the City pursuing the appeal and pushing up costs? Additionally, as explained above,the City has yet to adjust its ESSU allocations to accurately reflect the actual ratios. What's more, the City for the last several years claimed it was unable to provide the District with its ESSU calculations. Then, during a very recent public City Council meeting,the City's engineer volunteered that the information does exist and goes back for years. (City Council Mtg., 6/1/2016,video at time stamp 1:27:40.) This was news to the District. Based on that public comment, the District again requested the information under a Public Records Act request. In response,the City provided an ESSU summary going back to 2005,but it failed to provide material showing how the calculation was generated--i.e. what was the source of information used to actually generate the summary? After all, in order to assess the accuracy of the summary, it is necessary to evaluate the information on which the summary is based. Notwithstanding that, as noted above, when the City's other internal summary records are compared to the ESSU figures reported by the City on its Sewer Statistics report,there are substantial differences, some of which are discussed above. The point in all of this is that the District is, and has always been,willing and eager to work out these issues with the City. The perception otherwise is not grounded in fact. Finally, the implication that the City is concerned about the effect on District ratepayers of the lawsuit is disingenuous at best. The City, it should be pointed out, charges its customers a base rate that is approximately$11 per month higher than the District's base rates. There should be no difference in base rate. All told, the District estimates the City collects approximately$750,000 annually in additional base rate revenue from its ratepayers. In short,the District's actions seek to redress wrongs committed by the City that have resulted in substantial losses to District ratepayers. Absent abatement now,those losses will grow and continue indefinitely. Finally,the District's efforts here are genuine: funds generated by this lawsuit will, indeed, be for the benefit of District ratepayers. City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 10 Purple Water As discussed above, in the early 2000's the treatment plant was producing treated waste water that was near or beyond standards for, among other things,nitrate and ammonia content. The City,who was charged with overseeing design and construction of the Project, was well aware of these issues and the future environmental water standards. The City secured$75 million in financing to construct the Project. However, it now appears,the Project was deficient and nearing capacity almost as soon as it was finished. Now,the City proposes a$50+million(the numbers vary) fix in the form of the recycled water program, commonly referred to as the Purple Water project. On the other hand, it appears $10-25 million would permit a sufficient plant upgrade for the nitrate and ammonia problem. The City is concerned that such a fix to the plant will be a band aid of sorts, speculating that future environmental restrictions will render any newly-upgraded plant out of compliance in short order. The District does have concerns with the Purple Water project. First, on the City's watch, in 2006, system ratepayers assumed$75 million in debt for the expansion and upgrade of the existing plant,which when completed, was almost immediately rendered obsolete. Now,the City proposes to expend another$50+million to essentially fix the relatively new plant. Second, it is unclear whether the Purple Water project would handle all, or simply a portion of,the plant's discharge capacity. That said, during a presentation given to the District board by the City's Shawn White in April 2016, Mr. White stated that contracts in place to use the recycled water were not sufficient to handle all of the plant's treated water. (UVSD Bd. Mtg., 4/21/2016, video time stamp 11:20.) This is important because if any treated water is discharged into the river,it remains subject to environmental regulations, namely the nitrate and ammonia limits. The District's concern widens when it considers the fact there may be insufficient avenues to discharge the purple water from October through May (i.e. farmers,parks, and and the golf course don't typically use the same volume of water in cooler months as they do in warmer months and storage ponds can only hold so much water). In short, while the project would help the current situation--and may provide benefits in the form of a source of irrigation water--the issues with nitrate and ammonia levels in any remaining water the plant would need to discharge in the river must still be addressed. Lastly on this point,the City's statement in its September 14, 2016, letter that "...it is highly likely that no discharge whatsoever into the river will be allowed in the foreseeable future" appears to be speculation. Third, and significantly,the plant itself is at or near capacity. Absent additional capacity, there is little to no room for development. According to the most recent report prepared by the City and provided to the District,for the time period ending March 31, 2016,there are 12,006.71 ESSUs being used by system customers (Exhibit#2). But, as of March 2004,the City's reported ESSU allocation was as follows: CITY: 6603 (54.8% of total) DISTRICT inside CITY: 2543 (21.1% of total) DISTRICT outside CITY 2898 (24.1% of total) Total ESSUs 12,044 (Exhibit#3) City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 11 It seems rather unlikely that there would be a reduction of ESSUs during this time period. In fact, other City documents recently obtained by the District from the City as a result of a Public Records Request reflect that from April 1, 2005,through March 31, 2016,there were actually 388.57 new ESSUs added to the system. If that statistical information is correct, based on the March 31, 2004,ESSU count of 12,044 ESSUs,then the treatment plant currently has a total of 12,432.57 ESSUs, which puts it significantly over capacity and in a position similar to that which the parties faced in the early 2000's. Other documents show that while in 2002 the reported ESSUs were 13,211, in 2003 they dropped to approximately 11,500, only to increase to 14,400 or so in 2006 and then back down again to under 12,000 in 2007. The District can only scratch its head and say to itself"what is true?" Even by reference to the City's March 31, 2016, ESSU numbers, the plant remains over capacity. The ESSU calculations are therefore unreliable and untrustworthy. Consequently, the District is in a dilemma--they are unable to determine whether there exists sufficient capacity to meet current demand and desired development. The point is, it seems logical and wise to address these issues before there is commitment to another$50+million project. Fourth,the City has made it clear that any water generated by the Purple Water program belongs exclusively to the City and that the District will not share in any revenue generated from the program. (Rodin(City Mayor) letter, 10/13/2011,p. 9, § 14-Exhibit#4.) That said, since the Purple Water project will handle waste generated by District properties too, it appears the City will attempt to allocate the additional infrastructure and O&M costs to the District. Thus, another reason presents itself for fixing the allocation problem now. Moving on,there has been considerable public discussion associated with the effect of the District's lawsuit on City's ability to obtain financing for the Purple Water project. According to the City's September 14, 2016, letter to the District--which was made public-- it appears the City was already awarded approximately$10 million in grants for the project, and it may seek an additional $13 million in grants. The problem apparently arises with regard to loans for the Purple Water project. In any event, according to the letter, on April 18, 2016,the City, through its attorney, communicated telephonically with Sergio Rudin, an attorney representing the State Water Resources Control Board("SWRCB"),the entity who controls the loan funding. During that call,the City was informed that it would be required to confirm,through its counsel, that there is no lawsuit pending affecting the City's sewer system. The letter goes on to say that, during a further telephone call on June 28, 2016, SWRCB raised the issue of the District's lawsuit and stated that it will prevent SWRCB from entering into a loan agreement with the City. Again,the facts shed light on the issue. During a District board meeting on April 21, 2016--three days after the City was apparently initially contacted by the State regarding the issue--the City's Sean White made a presentation to the District board regarding the Purple Water project and handed out a power point packet to aid in the presentation. During his presentation, Mr. White made absolutely no reference to any issues with loan funding, grants, or,for that matter, any issues at all regarding the lawsuit. In fact, his presentation made it quite clear that the City had already received funding for the Purple Water City of Ukiah September 20, 2016 Page 12 project. In particular,the power point packet, which Mr. White orally discussed as well, conveyed the following with respect to the "Project History": a. "Summer 2013 and 2014-Prop 84 Grant Funds awarded in the amount of $2,090,191 to begin Phases 1 and 2"; and, b. "November 14, 2015-City applies for and receives Prop 1A Funds totaling $35,560,000 for Phases 1-3" (Exhibit#5,p. "8") In the portion of the presentation entitled "Project Funding," the following appears: a. "Total Grants received: • $2,090,191-Prop 84 • $9,996,000-Prop 1A b. Financing Received- SRF Loan at 1%Interest • $25,564,000" (Id.,p. "9," emphasis added.) In other words, as far as the District knew, the City had already received needed funding. On Friday, September 16, 2016,two of the District's attorneys, Donald McMullen and Giny Chandler,reached out to Sergio Rudin, counsel for SWRCB. M.r. Rudin's initial statements regarding loan status was that his client and the City were still in the negotiation phase--there had been no funding approval. Mr. Rudin confirmed that it was the City who decided to offer the sewer system revenue as security for the loan and the Department of Water Resources evaluated that offered security. But, as previously noted,the City already pledged all system revenue as security for repayment of the $75 million in bonds. The District presumes there is an explanation for this, but none has been given to it. In any event,Mr. Rudin did state that one of the issues his client has with the proposed security is the lawsuit. The District,through counsel, offered to meet and work with Mr. Rudin,his client, and the City in good faith in order to consider a resolution or workable conditions to allow the loan to fund. This was done without any request by the City to do so. A Final Point on the Issue: The City Itself Filed A Lawsuit Against the District A fact that has received little, or no, attention is that the City has perpetuated the lawsuit; this, in the face of the City's claims that the lawsuit is hamstringing its efforts to obtain Purple Water financing. Here are the facts. On June 30,2016--two days after the City claims it was told by SWRCB for the second time that the lawsuit would prevent loan funding--it filed its own lawsuit against the District. The action was taken in the District's lawsuit and is called a Cross Complaint. It is through this Cross Complaint, in allegations buried deep within it,that the District was told for the first time that the lawsuit might affect the City's loan financing for the Purple Water project. This is significant. On the one hand,the City asserts the lawsuit will preclude City of Ukiah September 20,2016 Page 13 loan funding,yet it perpetuates the suit by filing its own claims--claims that are unmeritorious at best. Further, and again, at no prior point in time did the City inform the District of this funding issue. At no time has it sought to address the issues in this litigation in an effort to secure the loan. Rather,the City simply suggests the District dismiss its lawsuit so funding may occur. As noted,however, doing so will only prolong and exacerbate the underlying problems. The City should take this funding issue as an impetus to sit down with the District, actually work through the underlying issues, and remedy past wrongs. In this, a complete resolution may result as to all issues affecting the parties. Even if the only issue resolved in the discussions is purple water, it will be progress. Summary In sum,the District has been left almost completely out of the loop on the Purple Water project. As expressed above,this is apparently the case because the City claims exclusive rights to the water and revenue to be generated by the project. The District cannot be expected to idly sit by and have another deficient project constructed, its costs improperly increased, and its ratepayers harmed. Therefore,unless the allocation,revenue, and other issues addressed above are not abated, not only will the District continue to see its already-significant losses related to the existing sewer system grow into the future,but the problem will only persist and deepen with the Purple Water project. Very truly yours, ow- DONALD J. McMULLEN Attorney for Ukiah Valley Sanitation District DMJ/kab Ends. cc: Client Leo R. Bartolotta, Esq. by email only Michael E. Chase, Esq. by email only David J. Rapport,Esq. by email only Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager EXHIBIT " 1 " CITY OF UKIAH Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position Fiduciary Funds June 30,2014 Private Purpose Trust Agency Downtown Ukiah Ukiah Valley Payroll Business Successor Total Private Sanitation Russian River Special Deposit Revolving Improvement Agency Purpose Trust District Garbage Billing Watershed Total Agency ,ssets :ash and investments $ 866,727 $ 550,389 $ 503 $ 4,414,059 $ X5,831,678 $ 4,589,293 $ 684,560 $ 140,322 $ 5,414,175 :ash and investments with fiscal agent - - - 5,760,668 5,760,668 - - - - teceivables: Accounts ' 15,220 202 829 - 16,251 355,532 23,567 - 379,099 Unbilled - - - - - 292,288 - - 292,288 Accrued interest - - - 9,947 9,947 15,953 1,517 313 17,783 teal property held for resale - - .. 3,730,238 3,730,238 - - _ - :apitalassets - - - 142295 142,295 2,268,471 - - 2,268,471 'otalassets 881,947 550,591 1,332 14,057,207 15,491,077 $ 7,521,537 $ 709,644 $ 140,635 $ 8,371,816 .iabilities • Lccounts payable 18,495 2,798 - 5,604 26,897 $ 522,163 $ 151,824 $ 26,021 $ 700,008 ,ccmed salaries and benefits - - - 390 390 - - - - ccrued interest - - - 137,240 137,240 - - - _ 'ayroll withholdings and employer contributions - 547,793 - 547,793 - - - :ustomer utility deposits 393,055 - - - 393,055 - - - - )ther deposits 470,397 - - - 470,397 - _ - )ue to other agencies 6,999,374 557,820 114,614 7,671,808 4oncurrent liabilities: • Due within one year - - - 965,000 965,000 - - - - Due in more than one year - - - 9,727,586 9,727,586 - - - Total liabilities 881,947 550,591 - 10,835,820 12,268,358 $ 7,521,537 $ 709,644 $ 140,635 $ 8,371,816 let Position leld in truatfor other purposes $ - $ - $ 1,332 $ 3,221,387 $ 3,222,7191 EXHIBIT "2" CITY OF UK.. .AND UVSD ESSU STATISTICS REPORT APRIL 1,2016 (0410112015-03/31/2016) City Accounts#ESSU Units UVSD#ESSU Units Total All Acct#ESSU Units Report March 2016 6306.64 5700.07 12006.71 March 2016%of Total 52.53% 47.47% 100.00% Percent Use to Date 60.79% 58.37% 59.22% March 2016 New Plant 20 Year Net 510.62 910.55 1421.17 ESSU Used New Plant Total ESSU's Remaining To 329.38 649.45 978.83 Date New Plant Agreement 35.00% 65.00% 100.00% New Plant Capacity 840 1560 2400 CITY.PRR.07-14-16.REQUEST#5 2278 EXHIBIT "3" CITY OF UKIAH and U.V.S.D. SEWER STATISTICS MARCH 2004 SEWER BILLING STATISTICS AS OF MARCH 2004 i � f J ktdal OSS sso 01014atawslds atv Total of all acc2m4 Biting 4 amts 6 units and 0 ands 9 untie jamt 9 scats 6 ante end tams B units amt •e accts Y units rant Code billed Mined Wad billed billed SADO 44 417 $.. 8,859.87 +' / rn 0 r , 'va414t. 2 x+ ^�',, 4 p, �� 44 417$ 8,08461 Sc 564 1584 $ 32,783.98 ?' r'a,: ^N w i«�� r - � � "` ��a�'c` r.�� � .19�" >Pf °��� �� seg, 1984 $ $2,161$68C2 1 1 $ 826° a i" �.�w'"P �.; 8�Mi'C`ts�wr ^""'`n. Nggr.t"t REI"'�W 1 1 $ 8.28 803tE :u; 'd car,w".", A 41104 torgarTo r—'" MOM_1 "E. m':.",+3. o 0$ - SDC ¢s"'."e &g,a '„g p,.,dry 136 1033$17060,88 era "d +`+ .7,,,g41 138 1033 $ 17,080.08 138 1034$ 17960.88 8O03 awl X11 f fM s 0 11;042 d + n-a 0 0$ 0 0 $ - sOc3 7 otr. � ' N'irlar 0 In'ag �.� ,�?5 0 0 4 0 04 8000 " l � 28 248$ 4,094.9@ `: r „ . 70 r`, r” 26 24B 5 4,094.8 20 248 .... 4,094.48 SD ` 1""b, 9't r r,34. 1270 1282 620,829.13 1640 2209 S 98,468.23 2910 9470$ 67,298.88 2910 3470$ 57,299.28 SR 4202 $ 89389.51 n„ a g + ' 7'+,k''`' ,.- 4 RE'01 a"'1w)41 .1 gd gl',,i..'; 4286 4202 S s.369.51 1 6tin 4t gi ti, n.g s '' rt. .,kzal,4 &rl1 r8 x 4 1 ,wr 4,'Velt4' OF TOTAL BO w ++- 0 129 689$ 11 370.53• 129 erg S 11370.69 129 $ 11,370.69 TOTAL S 109,028.40 1431 2543 $41,923.29 1769 2898$ 47,838.78, 9200 6440 8 60,1822.05 8075 t $ 198,848.45.__��...... 54.0% 17.7% 21.1% 21.1% 21.9% 24.1% 24.1% 39.8% 46.2%f 45.2% 100% 100% • f BO@Ing Codes for .on City Customers Codas for District Customers SADO aeweraddl ciaayesSDC Commetolrtsarcharges _........_ .M_..... we SC comresmits Sewer chanata 8002 1/2 ant Cmeme[dal sewer Dhow 8C2 1t2 unit Commercial avow charge 8803 113 ant Cornmsresl eawar wurg0 SC3 1/3 Commalutal sewer ctaspa 9DOD Addl6anal sewer units ''...... Rate 8ched.tieai.__. is 8R Rsoldeitialsawercherges_ SD Reeldsn6slsewercharges_ 1 Canamoroid Rawer charges 100 LCormixacial J easrorcharyoa Data was obtained from`Statistics Report'feature In Cty/1VSD billing system for period beginning 9/1/04 and ending 3131104. City customer count and charges am obtained from Categories"UK'and'COM'in the'total bels'column. The S of unts are obtained by dividing the amount biped by current rate of$18.51. sewer ESSU.XLS March 2004 CITY.PRR.07.14-16.REQUEST#5 2329 EXHIBIT "4" Letter to UVSD Board of Directors Page 9 Subject:Ad hoc committee proposals Dated: October 13,2011 Clarification of these provisions could address the on-going dispute over sharing administrative costs and could afford an opportunity to resolve the dispute over the 2009- 10, 10-11 and 11-12 budget years. Section 14 This proposal should be discussed by the City Council and the District Board. The City Council notes that Water Code Section 1210 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The owner of a waste water treatment plant operated for the purpose of treating wastes from a sanitary sewer system shall hold the exclusive right to the treated waste water as against anyone who has supplied the water discharged into the waste water collection and treatment system, including a person using water under a water service contract,unless otherwise provided by agreement." The current Participation Agreement does not agree to grant the District a right to treated waste water.As stated in the Preliminary General Comments,the City Council would have to be convinced that it is a benefit to the City's residents and sewer system ratepayers to share wash water produced by the WWTP with the District. The City Council looks forward to productive negotiations through the ad hoc committees on the changes to the Participation Agreement discussed by the ad hoc committees and the issues contained in this letter. Very truly yours, Mari Rodin,Mayor cc: City Council City Attorney City Manager UVSD 17974 EXHIBIT " 5" ( ..,,,,I.1111111111 , \ ,.i. II,-7./..r. r,°1111 Ity Of Li it a . , 1 h - . 1 , ,,,:....„. .. ... .. ,_,..,„,l'7,1:—......,.:z--2,—:-;."----..;,;;;:. ..;7—="gzatt,== THI .fl 1 11 S b� E�1TTAL DATE: April 13, 2016 TO: Ukiah Valley Sanitation District Attn: Frank McMichael, District Manager 151 Laws Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 FROM: Sean K. White Director of Water and Sewer 411 West Clay Street, Ukiah, CA 95482 Phone: (707) 467-5712 RE: RECYCLED WATER PRESENTATION Dear Frank, Enclosed you will find the presentation prepared for the April 21, 2016 meeting of the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District Board of Directors. In order to provide consistent information amongst our agencies, I have updated the most recent update given to the Ukiah City Council. The presentation contains all of the material you and your Board should need to prepare for your meeting. Sincerely, i "----- =ean K. White Enclosure Cc: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager David Rapport, City Attorney Tim Eriksen, PE, Director of Public works/City Engineer Jarod Thiele, Public Works Project Analyst W ,!41111ry, ,111mm Ukiah Valley Sanitation District Update April 21, 2016 1,1 II ' of Ukztih fledfill y «:..,11 II 11 � I,wah gora M' H 4 1wm uu• ' • September 1,2010-Council Approved Request for Proposals(RFP)for Engineering Services for the preparation of a Recycled Water Master Plan. • October 2,2010-5 RFPs were received and reviewed. Interviews were held with 2 firms and Carollo Engineers was selected by the review committee. • December 15,2010-City Council awarded the Contract to Carollo Engineers. • February 2011-Staff began working on the Master Plan with Carollo Engineers,Mendocino County Farm Bureau, Ukiah Valley Sanitation District and the Russian River Flood Control District with other stakeholder involvement. • August 12,2011-City received a Facilities Planning Grant from the State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB) which reimbursed 50%of the cost to prepare the Master Plan(hereinafter called"Recycled Water Feasibility Study"). • December 7,2011-City Council received an update on the progress of the Feasibility Study.Once data was gathered, stakeholder workshops were held and the alternatives were developed. • June 21,2012-Contract with Carollo Engineers was amended to include CEQA-Plus Initial Study. • June 5,2013-City Council adopted a resolution approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Recommended Alternative of the Recycled Water Feasibility Study. • Summer 2013 and 2014-Prop 84 Grant Funds awarded in the amount of $2,090,191 to begin Phases 1 and 2 • May 28,2014-City Council Awarded a contract to Carollo Engineers for the design of Phases I and II of the Recommended Alternative. • August 31,2015—SWRCB approves Change Petition WW0082 changing Purpose and Place of Use for Treated Wastewater • November 14,2015-City applies for and receives Prop 1A Funds totaling$35,560,000 for Phases 1-3 • March 16,2016-City amends agreement($697,629)with Carollo to add Design of Phase 3 and to complete a Water Balance Model F If „ 0 s ,s„s • Funds committed to date: • $1,543,531 Design, CEQA and Permitting Costs • Source of Funds: • City Sewer Capital Fund 844 • Total Grants received: • $2,090,191- Prop 84 • $9,996,000- Prop 1A • Financing Received- SRF Loan at 1% Interest • $25,564,000 • Annual Debt Service-$1,157,904 • 1996 AWT Loan paid off April 2016-$425,649 • Net Debt Service- $732,255 (10% of total Wastewater Operating Budget) ""NOMA """"m ATTACHMENT 5 City of Ukiah im GUifIUH/111?' 9A/"ANdJ4a PIUMIyryryymyyrrrreYkeini il,,,Mss+l4'[rR, October 5, 2016 Supplemental Information RE: ITEM 3B; OCTOBER 5, 2016; STATUS REPORT, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT'S LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF UKIAH RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM City Council: At the conclusion of the September 21st discussion regarding the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District's litigation against the City of Ukiah, the Council directed the City Manager to contact the UVSD District Manager to explore possible alternatives to litigation. On September 22, 2016, the City Manager requested a meeting with the District Manager to discuss a change in process outside of litigation to resolve the dispute and restore a working relationship. On September 26th, the District Manager replied indicating that he was out on medical leave and would call when he returns to the office. The full email string is included as Attachment#1. Subsequently on October 5th, the City Attorney received an email from Duncan James (Attorney representing the UVSD) indicating that the UVSD is willing to meet and has appointed a committee to represent it in any such discussion (Attachment#2). Staff recommends the Council consider appointing a committee to meet with the UVSD. Sincerely, 5:7„ , Sage Sangiacomo City Manager (707) 463-6221 r r a m r�.it r.erna...,: .mn.i���i.mmi NwrueuvIuicivurormF✓ um uOt nee. rc.rrrmamuur,uuri maiimxturvnm.WOa MmtnFmrm�smmmMu 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah • CA 95482-5400 Phone: (707)463-6200 Fax: (707)463 6204 th www.cityofukiah.com Ali tint Sage Sangiacomo From: Sage Sangiacomo Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 9:27 PM To: Ukiah Valley SD Subject: Re: Request to Meet Frank, Thanks for the email. I look forward to your call. Thanks, Sage Sent from my iPhone >On Sep 26, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Ukiah Valley SD<dm@uvsd.org>wrote: >Sage, > I have been on medical leave since Sept. 16th. I anticipate that I will be >gone another two weeks but will call you when I return to the office. > Frank > Original Message > From:Sage Sangiacomo [mailto:ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com] >Sent:Thursday,September 22, 2016 10:02 AM >To: FrankMcMichael (dm@uvsd.org) >Subject: Request to Meet >Good Morning Frank, >As you are aware,the City of Ukiah is requesting the District consider a >change in process outside of litigation to resolve the dispute and restore a >working relationship. There is simply too much at stake for the ratepayers, >system operations, and the community to not consider an alternative to >litigation and refocus on cooperation. > I believe you and I have a responsibility to our agencies and the community >to assist with developing a solution based resolution to this issue, and I > hope you would be willing to meet to discuss this topic. > If you are agreeable to this discussion, please forward some dates and times >that are convenient for you. Note: I'm out of the office September 26-28, >but I'm available before and after those dates. >Thank you for considering this request. >Sage Sangiacomo >City Manager >City of Ukiah >300 Seminary Avenue 1 > Ukiah,CA 95482 > P) 707-463-6221 > F) 707-463-6740 >ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com<mailto:ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com> >www.cityofukiah.com<http://www.cityofukiah.com/> >www.visitukiah.com<http://www.visitukiah.com/> A ffachmt)t if Q Sage Sangiacomo From: David Rapport<drapport@pacbell.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:23 AM To: Sage Sangiacomo; Sean White; Tim Eriksen; Doug Crane; Jim O. Brown; Kevin Doble; Maureen Mulheren; Steve Scalmanini Subject: FW: UVSD v. CITY I just received this. David J. Rapport Rapport and Marston 405 W. Perkins Street Ukiah, CA. 95482 Tel: 707-462-6846 Cell: 707-972-4944 Fax: 707-462-4235 Coast: 707-937-0785 Confidentiality Notice: This email may contain material that is confidential,privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient.Any review,reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: Duncan James [mailto:mendolaw@duncanjames.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 11:19 AM To: David Rapport Cc: Frank; 'Jim Ronco'; rvppages@netscape.net Subject: UVSD v. CITY In response to Mr. Sangiacomo's email dated September 22,2016 at 10:02 AM regarding meeting outside the litigation, the District has instructed me to advise you that they are willing to meet and spend whatever time may be necessary to resolve all issues affecting the City and District in the above referenced litigation but is not willing to authorize its District Manager to meet one-on-one with the City Manager to accomplish that objective. As an alternative,the District has appointed a committee to represent it in any such discussions. That committee is made up of Frank McMichael,District Manager; Jim Ronco,Board Chair; Bob Page,Board Member; and, legal counsel. Doug Losak will be at the Council meeting tonight to address the issue. DUNCAN Communication Received for Agenda Item 3b n, �;�wmnumumu°m'r�u°�nmw�u foo fif Op rt r • • City y of Ukiah ff,au,A,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,u,,,a,,,u,,,u,MAJ,u,,,u,,, October 19, 2016 Supplemental Information RE: ITEM 3B; OCTOBER 19, 2016; STATUS REPORT, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT'S LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF UKIAH RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM City Council: On October 5, 2016, the City Council formed an ad hoc consisting of Councilmembers Crane and Doble to engage the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District with the objective to seek a change in process outside of litigation to resolve the dispute and restore a working relationship. Immediately following the Council meeting, the City Manager engaged the District in attempt to confirm a meeting date/time. At the time of this memo, a date/time for the meeting was still pending a response from the District. The full email string is included as Attachment#1. Subsequent to the October 5th City Council meeting and as detailed in the email correspondence, the District has communicated other conditions that would be required including execution of a confidentiality agreement and limitations on City staff attendance. Council may wish to discuss the District's conditions and provide direction to the City's ad hoc. Sincerely, .77 Sage Sangiacomo City Manager I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I•I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIUNIIh11h11h11h11h11NIRlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIl1UUNNNiNMIWIWIWIWI IIUIIUNUNIh11h11h11h1111111011111111111111111111111111111111WIWIWIWIWIWIWIWIWI�IIIIIIIIIIIIWIIWININlIN11N11N11N11N11R111111111111111111111111111111111111UUNNNiNM 300 Seminary Avenue • Ukiah • CA • 95482-5400 Phone: (707)463-6200 Fax: (707)463-6204 -www.cityofukiah.com Atiarhrnef it #r Sage Sangiacomo Subject: FW: Request to Meet From:Sage Sangiacomo Sent:Wednesday,October 19, 2016 3:56 PM To: 'Frank'<dm@uvsd.org> Cc: 'Jim Ronco'<jim@jimroncoconsulting.com>; 'Robert Page' <rvppages@netscape.net>; Kevin Doble <kdobleukiah@gmail.com>; Doug Crane<doug.crane@craneofukiah.com>; 'Duncan James' <mendolaw@duncanjames.com>; David Rapport<drapport@pacbell.net>;Tim Eriksen <teriksen@cityofukiah.com>; Sean White<swhite@cityofukiah.com>; Kristine Lawler<klawler@cityofukiah.com> Subject: RE: Request to Meet Hi Frank Has the District selected one of the proposed meeting dates? Sage Sangiacomo City Manager City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 P) 707-463-6221 F) 707-463-6740 ssangiacomoc cityofukiah.com www.citvofukiah.com www.visitukiah.com From: Frank [mailto:dm@uvsd.gjg] Sent:Wednesday,October 19, 2016 3:01 PM To:Sage Sangiacomo<ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com>; Kevin Doble<kdobleukiah@gmail.com>; Doug Crane <doug.crane@craneofukiah.com> Cc: 'Jim Ronco'<iim@iimroncoconsulting.com>; 'Robert Page' <rvppages@netscape.net>; 'Duncan James' <mendolaw@duncaniames.com> Subject: FW: Request to Meet Sage, First:When I spoke to Duncan yesterday I understood him to say that an agreement for the negotiation process would be sent to Mr. Rapport by today.Apparently in my discussion with him on other matters, I conflated the timing of the two issues. He tells me that he had informed Mr. Rapport that the agreement would be sent by the end of this week and that will still be the case. My apologies for my screw-up. Second:Additionally, over lunch I gave more thought to your interest in having additional staff through our negotiation process. My focus has been on our earliest meeting for purposes of developing our agenda and process and procedures for finding agreement. I still think the initial several meetings have to occur with minimum numbers of people there for the beginning of our meetings. However, after reflection, if our early negotiation processes continues successfully, I can see where there would be value to having additional staff for particular issues or subjects.Therefore, I will recommend to the District's Ad Hoc committee that the District proceed with this understanding. 1 I continue to be hopeful for both agencies to find solutions to our litigation Frank McMichael District Manager From: Frank [mailto:dmtuvsd.orgj Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 10:33 AM To: 'Frank'; 'Sage Sangiacomo'; 'Kevin Doble'; 'Doug Crane (doug.crane@craneofukiah.com)' Cc: 'Jim Ronco'; 'Robert Page'; 'Duncan James' Subject: RE: Request to Meet Sage, Just a bit of clarification,the Ad hoc Committee consists of two board members and two councilmember with you and I as staff as well as the respective attorneys.After re-reading my earlier email it could be interpreted that I was saying that you and I were part of the ad hoc committee. Not so. Frank From: Frank [mailto:dm@uvsd.orcl) Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 10:08 AM To: 'Sage Sangiacomo'; 'Kevin Doble'; 'Doug Crane (doug.crane@craneofukiah.com)' Cc: 'Jim Ronco'; 'Robert Page'; 'Duncan James' Subject: RE: Request to Meet Good Morning Sage, My understanding is that Mr. Rapport will be receiving a c confidentiality agreement from Duncan James'office this morning. The District Board appointed two Board members plus myself and the District's attorneys to be part of a negotiation process for purpose of resolving our litigation issues. It was expected that the City would do the same, e.g.two council members and yourself along with the City's attorneys. It has been jokingly said that three people can keep a secret, if two are dead.This bon mot is a succinct way of saying that the fewer people involved in a confidential process,the less likely the confidentiality will be breached. It is my hope that we will be focused on resolving our litigation issues not discussing operations or management issues. It is also true that the fewer people on a committee the greater the likelihood of progress. Thus,the District for those reasons sees no value for Mr. Eriksen or Mr. White to be part of discussion of our litigation issues and declines to have them present during our litigation negotiations. I will confirm our meeting dates later today. Frank McMichael District Manager From:Sage Sangiacomo Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:41 PM To: 'Frank'<dm@uvsd.org> Cc: 'Jim Ronco' <jim@jimroncoconsulting.com>; 'Duncan James'<mendolaw@duncanjames.com>; Kristine Lawler <klawler@cityofukiah.com>; David Rapport<drapport@pacbell.net>;Tim Eriksen<teriksen@cityofukiah.com>;Sean White<swhite@cityofukiah.com>;Ashley Cocco<acocco@cityofukiah.com>; Doug Crane <doug.crane@craneofukiah.com>; Kevin Doble<kdobleukiah@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Request to Meet 2 Hi Frank, In addition to the previous date/timeI was also able to confirm availability for October 25th from 2:30pm—4:30pm and October 28mfrom 2pmn '3:3Opnn. Hopefully, one of the dates will work for the District's committee. Meeting attendees from the City: In addition to the City's ad hoc of Councilmembers Crane and Doble, staff from the City will include myself,Tim Eriksen, and Sean White along with David Rapport. As previously indicated,feedback from the City on the District's request for a confidentiality agreement will be forthcoming. Please forward the proposed agreement as this condition was not referenced in Mr.James' letter dated October 4, 2016(hand delivered by Mr. Losak on October 5, 2016 to the City Council) and has come up only in subsequent correspondence from the District. Thanks, Sage Sangiacomo City Manager City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 P) 707-463-6221 F) 707-463-6740 SG8OgiaCoDnoRcityofukiah.Co0O www.cityofukiah.com www.visitukiah.com From: Frank [mailto:dm@uvsd.orq] Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:22 AM To:Sage Sangiaconno<ssanRiaconno@cityofuNoh.com> Cc: 'Jim Ronco'<jim@iimroncoconsulting.com>; 'Duncan James'<mendolaw@duncanjames.com> Subject: RE: Request to Meet Sage, Mine concern is similar. Regarding the first meeting:The first meeting will of necessity be the signing of the confidentiality agreements and discussions as to schedules and procedures for future meetings. My understanding is that staff for each agency would be you for the City, me for the District and our respective attorneys. Chair Ronco has indicated that he has a medical appointment that conflicts with suggested date of October 27th which he cannot delay. He will be traveling for that appointment so an earlier time will not work. Are your people available on the 28th after 2:00 p.m.? I am pleased that the WWTP conference room is available,thank you for that. Frank From: Sage Sangiacomo moO Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:26 AM To: Frank Co: Kristine Lawler; Doug Crane; Kevin Doble;Tim Eriksen; Sean White; David Rapport; Ashley Cocco; 'Jim Ronco' Good morning Frank, My primary concern is resolving the dispute and moving forward to rebuild the fractured relationship. Chair Ronco's correspondence below reflects a number of inaccuracies, but I look forwarded to the upcoming meeting(s)to move beyond the rhetoric and litigation. Given the District's unavailability this week and request to meet the week of Oct.24-28,we have confirmed availability of the City's ad hoc(and staff)for Thursday,October 27''from 1:00 to 4:00 p.m. Please let me know if this date and time block works for the District. I have confirmed the availability of both the treatment plant meeting room and the Conference Center. The District can choose from either or provide an alternate location. Thanks, Sage Sangiacomo City Manager City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 P) 707-463-6221 F) 707-463-6740 ssangiacomoAcityofukiah.com www.cityofukiah.com www.visitukiah.com From: Frank [mailto:dm@uvsd.org] Sent:Wednesday, October 12, 2016 11:56 AM To: 'Jim Ronco'<jim@jimroncoconsulting.com>; 'Robert Page'<rvppages@netscape.net>; 'Duncan James' <mendolaw@duncanjames.com>;Sage Sangiacomo<ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com> Subject: First Negotiation Meeting To All, Duncan indicates that he is unavailable for next week, requests that we move to the week of Oct. 24-28. Frank From: Frank [mailto:dm@uvsd.org] Sent:Wednesday,October 12, 2016 9:44 AM To:Sage Sangiacomo<ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com> Cc: 'Jim Ronco'<jim@jimroncoconsulting.com>; 'Duncan James'<mendolaw@duncanjames.com> Subject: First Negotiation Meeting Sage, These are the dates that I am polling the District's ad hoc committee for our possible meeting next week: Oct. 18& 19 after 2:00 p.m. and all day either the 20th or 21st. This is subject to the confidentiality agreements being developed and executed by all parties. Our first meeting can occur at the Conference Center. 4 Frank From: Frank [mailto:dm uvsd.org] Sent:Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:10 AM To:Sage Sangiacomo<ssaniacomo cityofukiah.com> Cc: 'Jim Ronco'<iim jimroncoconsultin .com> Subject: FW: Request to Meet Good Morning Sage, Chair Ronco requested that I forward his below email to you. Frank From: Jim Ronco [mailto:Irma i roncoconsultingcom] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 12:03 PM To: 'Frank' Subject: RE: Request to Meet Please forward, at your discretion,the following comments to Mr.Sangiacomo's statements. It would appear that the selective memory of the City Manager and the "City" continues. I am flabbergasted that Sage would suggest that he initiated the suggestion to "sit down and talk" (from the beginning the District has asked to speak first). The propaganda machine of the city doesn't miss a beat. It is simple to see that the city is more concerned about taking credit for the illusion of cooperation than actually working towards a solution. I am seriously concerned that no progress will occur with the City unless they accept the situation they put themselves into by their deliberate and calculated actions to deceive and discredit the District, breach the public trust and misappropriate the money of the rate payors(District and City using same for non-sewer system City expenses). I am still waiting to receive the ESSU statistics from our July working group (sham, open and cooperative?) meeting that supposedly were being accumulated from existing statistical reports. Last I heard Mr. White was attempting create data to support the reports they had submitted over the years. In the appraisal business they used to have an acronym for a professional classification of appraisals "MAI" (made as instructed). I am assuming we will eventually receive a "FTF" (fabricated to fit) report I am not willing to meet anywhere but the treatment plant, Mr.Sangiacomo evidently has no awareness of the daily operations at the plant. That meeting room appears to be virtually vacant on every visit we have made. From:Sage Sangiacomo Sent: Monday,October 10, 2016 3:44 PM To: 'Frank'<dm@uvsd.org> Cc: Kristine Lawler<klawler@cityofukiah.com>;Sean White<swhite@cityofukiah.com>;Tim Eriksen <teriksen@cityofukiah.com>; Kevin Doble<kdobleukiah@gmail.com>; David Rapport<drapport@pacbell.net>; Doug Crane<doug.crane@craneofukiah.com> Subject: RE: Request to Meet Good Afternoon Frank, 5 In your last reply,you asserted that I don't"remember"the discussion content of our initial meetings. Please noteI did not suggest that I don't remember. I did state that"your recollection of our initial meetings does not match mine." There is a significant distinction. In review of your latest reply, I continue to maintain that your recount of the meetings does not match mine. Regardless, I'm pleased to see that we are now both in agreement that it is in the best interest of all to find a process outside of litigation to resolve the conflict. I also believe continued positioning and posturing is counterproductive and focus needs to be shifted to ending this costly litigation. Regarding the District's request for a confidentiality agreement, City staff will be advising the City's ad hoc of the various options and seeking direction. Feedback on this condition will be forthcoming. I look forward to finalizing a date and location for the first meeting. Outside of the WWTP,the City is completely open to meeting at whatever location the District deems acceptable. I will continue to hold the specified week at the Conference Center as an option. Thank you, Sage Sangiacomo City Manager City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 P) 707-463-6221 F) 707-463-6740 ssandiaco[Ooci1yofukiah.COnl www.cityofukiah.com VVVVVV.VisitUki8h.QorD From: Frank (mai|to:dms)uvsd.o[] Sent: Monday,October 102016 11:14 AM To: 'Jim Ronco'<iinn0Diinnnzncoconsuhing.com:; dnn@uvsd.orR Subject: FW: Request to Meet From: Frank [mailto:dm@uvsd.orci] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 10:41 AM To: 'Jim Ronco'; 'Robert Page'; Theresa y4cNmd|n Honne (tnmcnedin@sbco|oba|.net); 'kennnarahaU707@gmnai|.comn'; 'tnavisnma||.com'' 'Duncan]anles; 'Dona|dMcMu||en'; 'OouoLosak' Subject: FW: Request to Meet FYI. Frank From: Frank [mailto:dm@uvsd.orql Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 10:39 AM To: 'Sage Sangiacomo Subject: RE: Request to Meet 6 Well Sage, I am surprised that you don't remember. My first proposal to you was that you and I with our respective attorneys meet and see if we could "hash out" litigation issues. Not receiving any affirmative response, at the next meeting I suggested an ad hoc committee methodology. Before I made either of these suggestions, I first spoke to the District's attorney as to any possible negative effect on the litigation process. His response was that with the proper safeguards it would not be a problem and it would be good if such meetings could occur and resolution could be found. Unfortunately, it was necessary for me to inform my Board and the District's attorney that you wanted to focus on working together in the future without resolving past history(i.e. litigation issues). I distinctly remember telling you that unless the past history(meaning litigations issues)was dealt with, it would of little value to discuss a future working relationship, other than day-to-day operational issues. I am sorry you don't remember that. Regarding the WWTP conference room, I accept your decision, however, "Wi-Fi and other business services" are not needed for our meetings.Actually, in that the meetings are to be confidential, I think that having such connections would be potentially detrimental, in that assurance of non-broadcast of our discussions is very important if we are to have open and frank discussions.To my mind, along with signing confidentially statements, no audio recording devices, such as phones and notebook computers,should be allowed during our meetings. On Tuesday/Wednesday after conferencing with Chair Ronco,the District will indicate our preferred or acceptable locations for our discussion. Regardless of yours or my memory, I continue to be hopeful of an effective resolution. Frank From: Sage Sangiacomo [ ailto:ssan iac ci ofukiah.com] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 6:24 PM To: Ukiah Valley SD Cc: Kristine Lawler; Sean White; Tim Eriksen; David Rapport; Doug Crane; Kevin Doble Subject: RE: Request to Meet Good Afternoon Frank, Unfortunately,your recollection of our initial meetings does not match mine. From my very first outreach to you and continuing, I have emphasized the importance of resolving the dispute outside of litigation. I have expressed this to you during our meetings and publicly when discussing the issue. Regardless, I am pleased the City and Board have agreed to meet and I look forward to working towards a positive and productive outcome. Regarding meeting location/dates, I'd prefer not to impact the normal operations/workflow and staff at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. In addition,the facility is not equipped with public Wi-Fi and other business services. I have inquired with the Conference Center and have placed a hold on a room for the entire week of Oct. 17—21 as identified in your email as the District's preferred dates. We remain completely open to alternate locations including the use of either the District's or City's administration facilities. In order to expedite the confirmation of a date/time,we will also work to identify the availability of the City's ad hoc members and corresponding City staff within the period specified. Thanks, Sage Sangiacomo City Manager City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 P)707-463-6221 F)707-463-6740 ssangiacorno@cityofukiah.com 7 www.cityofukiah.com www.visitukiah.com Original Message From: Ukiah Valley SD [mailto:dm uvsd.or Sent:Thursday, October 6, 2016 12:25 PM To:Sage Sangiacomo<ssangiacomo cityofukiah.com> Subject: RE: Request to Meet Good Day Sage, I was pleased to see that the Council agreed to my Board's recommendation and appointed Council members Crane and Doble to an ad hoc committee for purposes of finding a "process outside of litigation"to resolve our issues. As I am sure you remember, when we were having one-on-one meetings last August/September, I suggested to you that we do that very thing as an alternative pathway to litigation but you were not at a point that you wanted to do that. But now the City is,so that is very good. I look forward to a rewarding discussion and am hopeful along with my Board that resolution can be had. Given that we are now at that point where we have an ad hoc committee process created, I will make every effort to facilitate our first meeting. I will be back from my medical leave on Tuesday(10-11-16) and will confer with the Board appointed committee members as to possible dates for our first meeting and of course I will need to accomplish a bit of"catch-up". I agree that a "soon" meeting is best, so our first meeting should occur within the next two weeks preferably the week of the Oct. 17th-21st as this will allow me time to bring myself up to speed as to the past three weeks. I suggest that we meet at the Conference Room at the WWTP as this room would not only be adequate for our needs but also has a symbolic value to our efforts to effect an agreement. If you agree to that location,would you send me some dates that the room is available and I will use those dates for purpose of querying my Board members as to their availability? If you do not agree to that location,then we will need to find a suitably neutral location that will work but it seems to me that using this facility provides the earliest opportunity for holding our first meeting.. Frank Original Message From: Sage Sangiacomo [mailto:ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com] Sent:Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:42 PM To: Ukiah Valley SD Cc: Doug Crane; Kevin Doble; David Rapport Subject: RE: Request to Meet 8 Dear Frank, At this evening's City Council meeting,the Council approved an ad hoc consisting of Councilmembers Crane and Doble to meet with the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District's committee. The City of Ukiah continues to request the District consider a change in process outside of litigation to resolve the dispute and restore a working relationship, recognizing there is simply too much at stake for the ratepayers,system operations, and the community. We appreciate that the District has formed a committee and is willing to meet/confer with the City regarding the litigation. The City's ad hoc is ready to meet and believes time is of the essence. Please forward some suggested dates/times for the first meeting. Sage Sangiacomo City Manager City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 P) 707-463-6221 F) 707-463-6740 ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com www.cityofukiah.com www.visitukiah.com Original Message From:Sage Sangiacomo Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 9:27 PM To: Ukiah Valley SD<dm@uvsd.org> Subject: Re: Request to Meet Frank, Thanks for the email. I look forward to your call. Thanks, Sage Sent from my iPhone >On Sep 26, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Ukiah Valley SD<dm@uvsd.org>wrote: >Sage, > I have been on medical leave since Sept. 16th. I anticipate that I >will be gone another two weeks but will call you when I return to the office. > Frank 9 > Original Message > From:Sage Sangiacomo [mailto:ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com] >Sent:Thursday,September 22, 2016 10:02 AM >To: FrankMcMichael (dm@uvsd.org) >Subject: Request to Meet >Good Morning Frank, >As you are aware,the City of Ukiah is requesting the District >consider a change in process outside of litigation to resolve the >dispute and restore a working relationship. There is simply too much >at stake for the ratepayers, system operations, and the community to >not consider an alternative to litigation and refocus on cooperation. > I believe you and I have a responsibility to our agencies and the >community to assist with developing a solution based resolution to >this issue, and I hope you would be willing to meet to discuss this topic. > If you are agreeable to this discussion, please forward some dates and >times that are convenient for you. Note: I'm out of the office >September 26-28, but I'm available before and after those dates. >Thank you for considering this request. >Sage Sangiacomo >City Manager >City of Ukiah >300 Seminary Avenue > Ukiah, CA 95482 > P)707-463-6221 > F)707-463-6740 >ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com<mailto:ssangiacomo@cityofukiah.com> >www.cityofukiah.com<http://www.cityofukiah.com/> >www.visitukiah.com<http://www.visitukiah.com/> Agenda Item 5a CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 October 5, 2016 6:00 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Ukiah City Council met at a Regular Meeting on October 5, 2016, having been legally noticed on September 30, 2016. Mayor Scalmanini called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Roll was taken with the following Councilmembers Present: Douglas F. Crane, Kevin Doble, Jim O. Brown, and Stephen G. Scalmanini. Councilmember Absent by Prearrangement: Maureen Mulheren. Staff Present: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; David Rapport, City Attorney; and Kristine Lawler, City Clerk. 3. PROCLAMATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation for Make A Difference Day, October 22, 2016 — Community Services. Presenter: Mayor Scalmanini. Staff Comment: Tami Bartolomei, Director of Community Services. Proclamation received by Rebecca Enberg, North Coast Opportunities Volunteer Network. b. Status Report, Discussion and Possible Action Regarding the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District's Litigation Against the City of Ukiah Related to the Operation of the Sanitary Sewer System —Administration. Presenter: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager. Public Comment: Doug Losak, UVSD Attorney; John McCowen; and Don Crawford. Nomination by Vice Mayor Brown for Councilmembers Crane and Doble to serve on Ad Hoc. Motion/Second: Crane/Brown to appoint Councilmembers Crane and Doble to serve on an Ad Hoc committee for Ukiah Valley Sanitation District (UVSD) Reconciliation, and to bring with them their designated legal counsel and necessary staff to meet with the UVSD committee. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Doble, Brown, and Scalmanini. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: None. Council Consensus directs staff to continue placing this item on future meeting agendas. 4. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Minutes of September 21, 2016, a Regular Meeting. Motion/Second: Brown/Doble to approve Minutes of September 21, 2016, a Regular Meeting, as submitted. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Doble, Brown, and Scalmanini. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: Crane. Cody u. na 111 IM o n u. dc Ifcb a ()donor , 2016, Condonuod 6. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION 7. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Consideration and Pofible Adoption of Resolution Establishing a Uniform Procccc of Minuto Taking and Meeting Recordation for All City Boards and Commissions City Clerk. Pulled by Councilmember Crane and Vice Mayor Brown and placed as Agenda Item 13c. b. Authorize Reactivation of the Associate Planner Position — Planning and Community Development. ._ .. '.e- -- - - A - - A - ._- Administration. Pulled by Mayor Scalmanini and placed as Agenda Item 13d. d. Approval of Updated 2016 Council Special Assignment List Showing Reassignments to the Economic Development & Financing Corporation (EDFC) and the Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA) Board of Directors — City Clerk. e. Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Agreement(s) (COU No. 1617-132) with the Ukiah Valley Medical Center and Special Ice Rentals LLC for an Outdoor Holiday Ice Rink — Community Services. f. Report of Emergency Repair of Jet A Fuel Pump and Filter Skid for the Bulk Storage Tank in the Amount of $15,905 (Purchase Order No. 44190), and Approve Corresponding Budget Amendment—Airport. Motion/Second: Crane/Doble to approve Consent Calendar Items 7b, and 7d-f, as submitted. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Doble, Brown, and Scalmanini. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: None. 8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Presenter: Peter Barrett. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS Presenter: Councilmember Crane. 10. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK REPORTS 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:15 PM) 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding a Council Position on Measure AF, the Mendocino Heritage Act. Presenter: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Public Comment: Sarah Bodnar, Campaign Manager for Measure AF; Mike Sweeney, No on Measure AF Committee; Tim Blake; Evan Johnson; Kerwin Powell; John McCowen, 2nd District County Supervisor; Phil Baldwin; John McCowen, 2nd District County Supervisor; Sarah Bodnar, Campaign Manager for Measure AF; Mike Sweeney, No on Measure AF Committee; Tim Blake; and Phil Baldwin. Page 2 of 4 Cody u. na 111 IM o n u. dc Ifcb a ()donor , 2016, Condonuod Motion/Second: Brown/Crane to support a No on Measure AF position, per Council discussion. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Doble, and Brown. NOES: Scalmanini. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: None. RECESS: 8:46— 8:58 P.M. b. Approve Plans and Specifications for North State Street Intersection - Low Gap Road / Brush Street Storm Drain and Signalization Improvements, Specification No. 16-06 and Direct Staff to Advertise for Bids. Presenter: Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer. Motion/Second: Crane/Doble to approve plans and specifications for the North State Street Intersection - Low Gap Road / Brush Street, Storm Drain and Signalization Improvements, Specification No. 16-06 and direct staff to advertise for bids. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Doble, Brown, and Scalmanini. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: None. 13. NEW BUSINESS a. Approval of Contract with SHN Consulting Engineers and Geologists, Inc. for the Pressure Zone 2 South Reservoir Rehabilitation/Replacement Project in the Amount of $84,472. Presenters: Sean White, Water/Sewer Director and Jarod Thiele, Public Works Management Analyst. Motion/Second: Crane/Brown to approve contract (COU No. 1617-133) with SHN Consulting Engineers and Geologists, Inc. in the amount of $84,472 for the Pressure Zone 2 South Reservoir Rehabilitation/Replacement Project. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Doble, Brown, and Scalmanini. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: None. b. Consider Appointment of Ad Hoc Committee for Litigation Entitled, "County of Mendocino v. Solid Wastes Systems" — Case No. SCUK-CVG-11-59459. Presenters: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager and David Rapport, City Attorney. Nomination by Councilmember Doble to appoint the Mayor and Vice Mayor to the ad hoc. Motion/Second: Crane/Brown to appoint Mayor Scalmanini and Vice Mayor Brown to a City Council ad hoc committee to work with the County's ad hoc committee for litigation entitled, "County of Mendocino v. Solid Wastes Systems" — Case No. SCUK-CVG-11-59459. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Doble, Brown, and Scalmanini. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: None. c. Consideration and Possible Adoption of Resolution (2016-58) Establishing a Uniform Process of Minute Taking and Meeting Recordation for All City Boards and Commissions— City Clerk. From Consent Calendar Item 7a Presenters: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk and Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager. Council Consensus to bring back this item with modification to the resolution that the minutes will become Action Minutes when the digital recordings are concurrently being created and posted online. Page 3 of 4 Cody u. na 111 IM o n u. dc Ifcb a ()donor , 2016, Condonuod d. Authorization for the City Manager to Accept Mitigation Funding from Pacific Gas & Electric for the Community Pipeline Safety Initiative, and Approve Corresponding Budget Amendment(s) —Administration. From Consent Calendar Item 7c Presenters: Tami Bartolomei, Community Services Administrator and Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager. Motion/Second: Brown/Doble to authorize the City Manager to accept mitigation funding from Pacific Gas & Electric for the community pipeline safety initiative, and approve corresponding budget amendment(s). Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Crane, Doble, Brown, and Scalmanini. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mulheren. ABSTAIN: None. CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 9:35 P.M. 14. CLOSED SESSION a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: City of Ukiah v. Questex, LTD, et al, Mendocino County Superior Court, Case No. SCUK- CVPT-15-66036 b. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Ukiah Valley Sanitation District v. City of Ukiah, Sonoma County Superior Court, Case No. SCV 256737 c. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: County of Mendocino v. Solid Waste System, Inc. et al., Mendocino County Superior Court, Case No. SCUK-CVG-11-59459 d. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation (Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Ukiah Citizens for Safety First v. City of Ukiah, Mendocino County Superior Court, Case No. SCUKCVPT 14-63579 e. Conference with Legal Counsel —Anticipated Litigation Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Number of potential cases (1) 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:36 p.m. Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Page 4 of 4 i .�. ITEM NO.: 7a MEETING DATE: October 19, 2016 City of Vkiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER Summary: Payments made during the month of SEPTEMBER 2016, are summarized on the Report of Disbursements. Further detail is supplied on the Schedule of Bills, representing the five (5) individual payment cycles within the month. Background: Accounts Payable check numbers: 3018333—3018431, 3018432—3018511 3018512—3018608, 3018609—3018709, 3018710 -3018821 Accounts Payable Wire Transfer numbers: Payroll Check numbers: 504231 —504274, 504275—504307, 504308-504333 Payroll Manual check numbers: 504275, 504276, 504277 Void check numbers: 3008926, 3015459, 3015592, 3015799, 3018062, 3018279, 3018407, 3018570, 3017737 Discussion: This report is submitted in accordance with Ukiah City Code Division 1, Chapter 7, Article 1. FISCAL IMPACT: Amount in New Appropriation Budgeted Source of Funds Account Number Budget Amendment 16-17 FY Required (Title&No.) See Attached N/A See Attached Yes 0 No RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Approve the Report of Disbursements for the month of SEPTEMBER 2016 ALTERNATIVES: N/A Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: City Manager Prepared by: Management Analyst—Finance Department Coordinated with: Finance Director and City Manager Presenters: Attachments: Report of Disbursements COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑Approved ❑ Continued to U Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note:Please write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted.. Approved: e Sa gi a •mo, City Manager CITY OF UKIAH REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS REGISTER OF PAYROLL AND DEMAND PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER FUNDS: 100 General Fund 5167.663.14 700 Sanitary Disposal Site Fund 527812.43 105 Measure S General Fund 577,228.83 701 Landfill Corrective Fund 110 Special General Fund 702 Disposal Closure Reserve Fund 201 Worker•sCompFund $478.00 704 Post Closure Fund-Solid Waste 50.00 202 Liability Fund 51,459.00 720 Golf Fund 51.20 203 Garage Fund 56,254.09 730 Confemence Center Fund 56,987.54 204 Purchasing Fund 58,369.59 750 Visit Ukiah sass 205 Billing&Collections Fund $21,732.17 777 Airport Fund 384,515.80 206 Public Safety Dispatch Fund 51,283.02 778 Airport Capital Improvement Fund 207 Payroll Posting Fund 5234,240.63 779 Special Aviation Fund 208 Building Maintenance/Corp Yard Fund $0.00 800 Electric Fund 5761846.63 209 IT Fund $0.00 801 Electric Capital Reserve Fund 55,545.33 220 Equipment Reserve Fund 536,639.18 803 Lake Mendocino Bond Reserve 250 Special Revenue Fund $34,429.81 805 Street Lighting Fund 512,240.29 251 Special Projects Reserve Fund $16,405.50 806 Public Benefits Fund $10,321.26 300 Park Development Fund 820 Water Fund $64,364.09 301 Anton Stadium Fund 30.00 822 Water Capital Improvement Fund $565,079.37 302 Observatory Park Fund 840 City/District Sewer Fund 5333,976.63 304 Swimming Pool Fund $0.00 841 Sewer Contruction Fund 305 Riverside Park Fund $0.00 843 Sewer Capital Fund 306 Skate Park Fund $0.00 900 Special Deposit Trust $20,057.71 310 Museum Grants 5128,821.71 901 General Service(Accts Recv) 51,045.87 311 Alex Rorbaugh Recreation Center Fund 58,837.31 902 U.S.W.Billing&Collection 522,520.74 312 Downtown Business Improvement Fund 903 Public Safety-AB 109 50.00 500 2108 Gas Tax Fund 905 Federal Emergency Sheller Grant 501 2107 Gas Tax Fund 58.090.49 905 Mendocino Emergency Service Authority 503 2105 Gas Tax Fund 911 Russian River Watershed Association $47,367.60 505 Signalization Fund 940 Sanitation District Special Fund 58,413.85 506 Bridge Fund 943 Sanitation District Capital Improvement Fund 507 1998 STIP Augmentation Fund 952 REDIP Sewer Enterprise Fund 508 S8325 Reimbursement Fund 960 Community Redevelopment Agency 508 S.T.P.Fund 981 ROA Housing Pass-Through 510 Trans-Traffic Congest Relief Fund 962 Redevelopment Housing Fund 800 Community Development Block Grant 983 Housing Debt 601 EDBG 94-333 Revolving Loan 964 RDA Capital Pass-Through 602 Community Development Fund 965 Redevelopment Capital Improvement Fund 603 08-HOME-0688 966 Redevelopment Debt Service 604 CDBG Grant 09-STBG-6417 967 Housing Bond Proceeds 605 11-HOME-7654 Fund 50.00 968 Non-Housing Bond Proceeds 606 CDBG Grant 10-EDEF-7261 969 RDA Obligation Retirement Fund $306.00 607 Prop 84 Grant Fund 844/944 Sewer Capital Projects Fund $379,595.27 609 13-CDBG-8940 5126,280.52 Retainage Withheld 525.156.25 630 Asset Seizure Fund 515,427.61 830 Recycled Water Fund 58.50 631 Asset Seizure Fund(Drug/Alcohol) 633 H&S Education 11489(B)(2)(A1) 634 Federal Asset Seizure Grants 635 SUP Law Enforcement Service Fund 51,250.00 637 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 638 Asset Forfeiture 11470.2 H&S 639 Special Revenue-Police 50.00 840 Parking District Fund 5714.73 691 Museum Fund 54,005.73 PAYROLL CHECK NUMBERS:504231-504274 TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS-A/P CHECKS $3,272,871.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS:78216-78420 TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS-WIRES*&EFTs 5508.00 PAYROLL PERIOD:8/14/16-8/27/16 TOTAL PAYROLL CHECKS&DIRECT DEPOSITS 31,139,565.12 PAYROLL CHECK NUMBERS:504275-504307 TOTAL PAYROLL EFTS(TAXES,PERS,VENDORS) 5885,784 35 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS:78421-78809 •vendor name(0 applicable) PAYROLL PERIOD:8/28/16-9/10/16 ._.. ......... ........ PAYROLL CHECK NUMBERS:504308-504333 DIRECT DEPOST NUMBERS:78610-78797 PAYROLL PERIOD:9/11/16-9/24/16 VOID CHECK NUMBERS: TOTAL PAYMENTS $5,298728.79 3008928,3015459,3015592,3015799, 3018062,3018278,3018407,3018570, 3017737 MANUAL CHECK NUMBERS: 504275,504276,504277 WIRE TRANSFER NUMBERS: CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK This register of Payroll end Demand Payments was duly approved by the City Council on City Clerk APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER CERTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I have examined this Register and approve same. I have audited this Register and approve for accuracy and available funds. City Manager Director of Finance Account Code Summary 10000000 General Fund 20526430 Electric Department-Meter Readers 10010000 City Council 20620231 Ukiah Dispatch 10011100 City Clerk 20620232 Ft Bragg Dispatch 10011300 Elections 20700000 Payroll Posting Fund 10012100 City Manager 20822500 Building Maintenance 10012200 Administrative Support 20824300 Corporation Yard 10012400 Miscellaneous General Government 20922900 IT Fund 10013400 Finance Department 22013300 FA Replace-Finance UB 10014000 City Attorney 22020200 FA Replace-Police Operations 10015100 Treasury Management 22021210 FA Replace-Fire Administration 10016100 Human Resources 22022900 FA Replace-Information Technology 10017100 Economic Development 22024100 FA Replace-Garage 10018000 Community Outreach 22024220 FA Replace-Streets 10020217 Animal Control 22024413 FA Replace-Water Distribution Cap 10022100 Parks 22024414 FA Replace-Water Distribution O&M 10022300 Aquatics 22024421 FA Replace-City Wastewater 10022800 Recreation 25024210 Engineering Reserve 10022810 Recreation Administration 25024300 Corporation Yard Reserve 10022821 Adult Basketball 25122900 CIP-IT 10022822 Adult Softball 25123100 CIP-Planning 10022824 Co-Ed Volleyball 25124210 CIP-Engineering 10022831 Youth Basketball 25124220 CIP-Streets 10022832 Youth Softball 25124410 CIP-Water 10022840 Day Camp 25124421 CIP-City Wastewater 10022850 Classes&Clinics 25126410 CIP-Electric 10022860 Special Activities 30022200 Park Development 10023100 Community Planning 30122210 Anton Stadium 10023320 Building Inspection 30222220 Observatory Park 10024210 Engineering 30522250 Riverside Park 10024214 Traffic Signals 30622260 Skate Park 10024220 Streets 30822280 Project Planning 10024224 Storm Drains 31022700 Museum Grant 10514000 Police-City Attorney 31122870 Alex Rorabaugh Recreation Center 10520210 Patrol 31217100 Downtown Business Improvement District 10520214 Police Reserves 50524210 Engineering-Signalization Fund 10520216 COPS Grant 50624210 Capital Engineering 10520218 Police-CSO 50824210 SB325-Engineering 10520224 Police-Major Crimes Task Force 50824220 SB325-Streets 10521210 Fire Administration 50924210 STP-Engineering 10521312 Fire Volunteer Station 50924220 STP-Streets 20112400 Worker's Compensation Fund 51024220 Trans-Traffic Slurry Seal 20212400 Liability Fund 510X9999 Trans-Traffic Project 20324100 Garage Fund 60217441 Grant-CDBG 602 20413500 Purchasing Fund 60317442 Grant-HOME 603 20513300 Billing and Collections 60417441 Grant-CDBG 604 20514000 Billing and Collections-City Attorney 60517442 Grant-HOME 605 20524412 Water Department-Meter Readers 60517461 First Time Homebuyer Program Account Code Summary )517462 FTHB Activity Delivery 80026130 Electric Substation )517467 FTHB-PIR 80026140 Reimbursable Work for Others )600000 CDBG Grant 10-EDEF-7261 Fund 80026200 Electric Metering )617441 Grant-CDBG 606 80026300 Electric Generation )617451 General Administration 80026312 Mendocino Hydro )617452 AD ED Direct Financial Assistance 80026330 Hydro Electric )617453 ED Direct Financial Assistance 80026400 Electric Administration 3717443 Grant Prop 84 80026410 Electric General Administration 3724413 Prop 84 Water Distribution Cap 80026430 Interdepartmental Charges 3900000 13-CDBG-8940 80326330 Hydro Plant 3917458 13-CDBG-8940 80526610 Street Lighting 3020210 Asset Seizure Expenditure 80626500 Public Benefit 3120210 Drug&Alcohol Education 82024410 Water 3320210 H&S Asset Seizure Expenditure 82024411 Water-Production O&M 3420250 Fed Asset Seizure Expenditure 82024413 Water-Distribution Capital 3520210 SLESF 82024414 Water-Distribution O&M 3820210 Asset Forfeiture 11470 82024415 Water-Production Capital 4020213 Parking Enforcement 82224413 Water-Distribution Capital 9122700 Museum 84024420 Wastewater 0024500 Landfill 700 84024421 Wastewater City-O&M 0224500 Landfill Closure 84024422 Wastewater City-Capital 0424500 Landfill Post closure 84024425 Wastewater Treatment-O&M 2022400 Golf 84124426 Wastewater Treatment-Capital 3022600 Conference Center 84224420 Wastewater 5017110 Visit Ukiah 84324422 Wastewater City-Capital 7725200 Airport Operations 84424421 Wastewater City Capital-O&M 7817411 FAA Grant 84424422 Wastewater City-Capital 0026100 Electric Administration 90000000 Special Deposit Trust Fund 0026110 Electric Overhead 91190100 Russian River Watershed Assoc 0026120 Electric Underground 96900000 Successor Agency Object Code Summary 12102 INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 52526 FRAUD INVEST.ASSESSMENT 12103 STORES PURCHASES 52527 A.D.P. PREMIUM &DEDUCTIBLE 12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES 52528 LIABILITY INSURANCE 12105 STORES ISSUES 52529 EARTHQUAKE&FLOOD PREMIUMS 51211 PERS UNFUNDED LIABILITY 52530 POLLUTION-ENVIRON INS PREMIUM 51280 OVERTIME/CALLOUT MEALS 52531 UMEMPLOY. INS EXPENSE 51285 CALLOUT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS 52532 SAFETY&TRAINING SUPPORT 52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES 52600 RENT 52107 CONTRACTED SERVICES-EIR 52841 SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMIN 52108 CONTRACT SERVICES-GPU 54100 SUPPLIES 52110 AMBULANCE BILLING 54101 POSTAGE 52111 MAINT.CONTRCTS-DEFIBRULATOR 54102 SMALL TOOLS 52112 M.S.OVERSIGHT 54105 PHOTOGRAPHIC EXPENSE 52113 PLANNING STUDIES 54106 SPECIALTY SUPPLIES 52114 COMPLIANCE STUDIES 54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES 52120 LABOR CHARGES FROM OTHER DEPAR 54121 PW-ASPHALT CONCRETE 52130 EDUCATIONAL&MARKETING MATL'S 54122 PW-AGGREGATE BASE 52131 ASSISTANCE TO SENIORS 54123 PW-CRACK SEALANT 52132 EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE 54124 PW-CONCRETE/SUPPLIES 52133 MONTHLY DISCOUNT PROGRAM 54125 PW-TRAFFIC PAINT 52134 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 54126 PW-PREMARKS 52135 ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM 54127 PW-SIGN POSTS/SHEETING 52136 PHOTOVOLTAIC RATES/INCENTIVE 54128 PW-COLD PATCH MATERIAL 52137 PUBLIC BENEFITS PROGRAM MGMT 54129 PW-TACK OIL 52138 NCPA PUBLIC BENEFITS PROGRAM 54130 PW-SAFETY 52139 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT& DEMO 54131 PW-BARRICADES&CONES 52140 LITIGATION EXPENSES 54160 HR-CITY LIABILITY&CONTRACT 52145 DETACHMENT-SEWER-UVSD 54161 HR-BACKGROUND&PHYSICALS 52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES 54162 HR-ADVERTISING 52151 AFLAC&PERS INSUR ADMIN FEES 54163 HR-INTERVIEW SUPPLIES 52170 UKIAH WASTE SOLUTIONS 54164 HR-FORMS&OTHER DIV. EXP. 52171 RESIDENTIAL BILLING CHARGE 54165 HR-NEW EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT 52172 COMMERCIAL OVERSIGHT FEE 54166 HR-DOT TESTING PROGRAM 52180 SECURITY SERVICES 54167 HR-EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT 52301 PROPERTY TAX ADMIN FEE 54168 HR-REMIF SAFETY TRNG &SUPPO 52302 AMBULANCE FEES 54201 PRISONER EXPENSE 52303 REHITSUPPORT 54202 MAJOR CRIME INVETIGATIONS 52304 LAFCO FEES AND PROP TAX EXP 54320 SOFTWARE 52500 TRUSTEE FEES 55100 TELEPHONE 52510 ADVERTISING&PROMOTION 55200 PG&E 52515 ADVERTISING &PUBLICATION 55210 UTILITIES 52521 LIABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM 56100 VEHICLE& EQUIPMENT MAINT. &R 52522 LIABILITY INSURANCE DEDUCT 56110 CITY GARAGE-PARTS 52523 BOILER/MACHINERY PREMIUMS 56111 CITY GARAGE-LABOR 52524 PROPERTY INSURANCE 56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE 52525 WORKER'S COMP. EXPENSE 56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE&REPAIR 56121 R& M RADIO EQUIPMENT 80235 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56122 R&M NON-AUTO EMS EQUIPMENT 80236 EMERGENCY/CONTINGENCY 56123 R& M COMPUTERS 90100 LOAN PROCEEDS 56124 MAINT CONTRACT DEFIBULATORS 90101 LOAN PAYMENT RECEIVED 56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES 90301 LOAN REPAYMENT 56210 FUEL&FLUIDS 90410 BOND PROCEEDS 56300 BUILDING MAINT. &REPAIR 56410 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PRIVATE 56504 FACILITY MAINTENANCE& REPAIR 56600 AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE& REPAIR 56700 LANDFILL CLOSURE EXPENSE 57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING 57101 CONF&TRAINING-AQUATICS 57102 CONF&TRAINING-PARKS STAFF 57200 MEETINGS 57300 MEMBERSHIPS&SUBSCRIPTIONS 58101 NCPA PLANT GENERATION 58102 NCPA POWER PURCHASES 58103 NCPA TRANSMISSION 58104 NCPA MANAGEMENT SERVICES 58105 NCPA THIRD PARTY SALES 58106 NCPA PASS THROUGH COSTS 58107 NCPA COMMITMENTS ACTIVITY 58201 WATER PURCHASES 58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT CHEMICAL 58401 AVIATION FUEL 58410 GARAGE LUBRICANTS&PARTS 58510 REIMBRSABLE JOBS 59100 PROPERTY TAXES PAID 59101 FEES 59102 FRANCHISE FEES 59350 PURCHASE DISCOUNTS TAKEN 59400 OTHER EXPENSES 70101 LOAN PAYMENTS MADE 70102 BOND INTEREST PAYMENTS 70110 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 70201 LOAN PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 70202 BOND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 80100 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT 80200 BUILDINGS ACQUISITION 80210 LAND ACQUISITION 80220 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 80230 INFRASTRUCTURE 80231 RECYCLING STUDY 50%GRANT MATC 80232 LINE REPLACEMENTS 80233 MAIN REPLACEMENTS 80234 INFLOW/INFILTRATION List ° 11'1'41111vn, km ..L'HI, un iF „�r lll'„nlo„ „ „1 of „ ; 11 Q The foHowhg I16st of bHIls payable vvas revoe.v°gi d and approved fr o° payment 5(30-4,.....,._ ____ el—a , ii< c'7::::::-''' ')-— ----\?:9,--N-- Inv,1,-, Im.Il8l,qi �m 0000.„1.0,011$110,„:11,1;11.11,,.1,11,11,11#r . 1oml�rl ' f1r�r�, ,iU pioor I; oi i�b ill oNi,r11ii go * IIwuI��p'i1l,u.p���fi�r_- 6Ii.l�� a ,1Ip1 mliq�uU i„Iw` WyU HW i1111 i Hfum HI ii u,111, U1.f.ii ni�u, go.„,,, 11 �i ACCOUNTEMPS 46440133 TEMPORARY SERVICES - $1,080.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $270.00 PURCHASIN 20413500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $810.00 Vendor Total: $1,080.00 AIMEE SHIELDS SEPT-16 TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES FOR $1250.00 63520210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,250.00 POL Vendor Total: $1,250.00 ALPHA ANALYTICAL 6073301- WATER AND WASTEWATER $582.00 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $582.00 LABORATORIES INC UKIAHLF TREATING 60773300— WATER AND WASTEWATER $2,568 95 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,568.95 UKIAHLF TREATING 6073028— WATER AND WASTEWATER $3,905.95 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,905.95 UKIAHLF TREATING 6072986- WATER AND WASTEWATER $3,963.95 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,963.95 UKIAHLF TREATING Vendor Total: $11,020.85 AT&T 0602067171 LIVE SCAN $972.12 10520210-55100 TELEPHONE $972.12 Vendor Total: $972.12 BIO REMEDIATION 08-10-2016-3 CHEM SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $920.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($1.15) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX—MEASURE S ($4.60) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($69.00) List 1,,,,,,,,f hewe '1 Pr „,, � 'II HT .ppm,� 7 „� n 9/�,l . 7111:1446 'Jr.nv ices UII mijpll,rryYYllluuv ,,,..„0,,,,,,,,111, , �,, a I -. IIL, rf'”' �'NwY 1�(a,� l:i@ :�/ uII ��WllP,;,,,i 11,14,I, ,,,,,,,1„-,,yp(,fii,,,, IL,,,, /,N�mf , I mNm 4 p„i�� �.Y',jrem! V�Ill r i ��� R�iupou'H��"r,,,,. �IVr IIIII IMI Illu uol III II01111111 IIIII ���������������������������������������IIII III Illi IIII IIIII tll IN IIIA II011(II III IIII III ISI ,..N , 1111111 I I� � )�i)„unim,�ll 1 'Ili!"'( iml IIII Illlollllllllullllllllllll nu0 ml II Ilo VIII Ilii.III lull',ll I ��01011��000 BIO REMEDIATION 08-10-2016-3 CHEM SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $920.00 84024425-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $74.75 CHEMICAL 84024425-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $920.00 CHEMICAL Vendor Total: $920.00 BURLINGAME ENGINEERS INC BER7072 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $677.40 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 $677.40 '.. REPAIRS REPAIR Vendor Total: $677.40 CA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOC 2231 CMUA GRID REGIONLALIZATION $2,560.00 80026400-57300 MEMBERSHIPS 8 $2,560.00 SPECIAL PROJECT SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $2,560.00 CARTER MOMSEN PC DV083116 JUDGEMENT AGAINST UVSD $6,305.40 94000000-44721 SEWER 1 RESIDENCE(UVSD) $6,305.40 FROM SMALL CLAIMS COURT Vendor Total: $6,305.40 CATHLEEN PANTTAJA DV 082216 INSTRUCTOR $2,660.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,326.50 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,333.50 Vendor Total: $2,660.00 CINDY SAUERS TR 08/16- TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT $600.86 80026400-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $600.86 08/18/16 Vendor Total: $600.86 CLEARS INC DV 082216 TRAINING REGISTRATION $50.00 20620231-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $50.00 Vendor Total: $50.00 COMPUTER OPTIONS INC BILL40834 IT SERVICES $17,100.00 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $17,100.00 Vendor Total: $17,100.00 COUNTY OF MENDOCINO AUG16 SPANISH MTN SUBLEASE MO $50.00 20620231-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $50.00 RENT-N JULY16 SPANISH MTN SUBLEASE MO $50.00 20620231-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $50.00 RENT-N r ° , ��, alp II ,�.��I �� List - � ec11nWrr Iprpr fl 1111. �u r„'',, 1 Ir” ll rii IIh Yi i� 11'�1J1 ,. Inv htices r 1Ju1II1�m IIIII _.ywopAJlk1J,rr„H111111,1;111111111111111111111141pl))irlll ni(/(iipi tltl,����eur�1f))o4 T{��pI IIi�u�7U��puu ul..,r� ,,,rrrppri(/�r(i no.,mmUu IIu41 rmr40/((u�y11.,,nj///�uJ,,.7 li,llpll/ri., I. ullryp��lll 1.�,7„+��(�( ��r((�f((ry�II��II II, Ig IIII IIIII�II�10111 i.10111,1,11111-11111'''' .����'91i1�1� I(IiI VIII IID .Ifmll u 11u11i.i:.'Iiillllilll 111 lllrll�lllllllllll.;,h,Ah�,.11i”luullll �lllllrli NI VIII VIII IrI II 711 I�L�IfIIW �i ull,elf�l1>m”��I Ii��IIII IiI �I IIiyIIINII101111N7rrI!,111ll ill 41 IIIIIIIIIL. COUNTY OF MENDOCINO SEPT16 SPANISH MTN SUBLEASE MO $50.00 20620231-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $50.00 RENT-N Vendor Total: $150.00 CRAWFORD&ASSOC INC 34482 ENGINEERING SERVICES• $1,421.75 80026330-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,421.75 HYDROELE Vendor Total: $1,421.75 CWEA DV 082416 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL-JOANNE $83.00 84024425-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $83.00 WALTS Vendor Total: $83.00 DARLENE R SIMPSON 41178 Contract 1516140 retainage $9,064.00 25100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $90.01 12/01/2015 to 25100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $204.00 25100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $679.50 50100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $448.50 50100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $804.24 50100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $1,484.75 50100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $2,572.27 50100000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $2,780.73 Vendor Total: $9,064.00 DAVID KORNEGAY DV 082216 INSTRUCTOR $770.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $770.00 Vendor Total: $770.00 DAVID WILLOUGHBY DV 082416 TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT $125.00 10023320-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $125.00 TA 09/11- TRAVEL ADVANCE $913.00 10023320-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $913.00 09/15/16 Vendor Total: $1,038.00 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY DV082616 2016 FALL BALL $350.00 10022822-44915 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOME $350.00 _ � � 1,ri:1lid? I° uIL,I�r � P prorl, 471,0 10 ;y 7:11 , 9 ",.�„ ::. �? uu ^ v�N » l�l; ,Y mi1D a»,,� IT'II Ol p iiu r 1,1,,,i0,,,;,,, ,,,,,),,,,1,11 uoo i i um Vm i dVo lm l II iui „111111111„„„„0,,,,,,, ,Io lid Dl of i� i', � f i of iw�,»r�,��rrm��fl i i i uo i IIIU� ����� .'., ���Wl �. Abu ������ { m imioNi�o o mwio i�lllmlmiPmimmi0_imulum61mu a io unu ioi DEEP VALLEY SECURITY 299666 STD INSPECTION PER CALL- $75.00 20824300-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $75.00 GARA Vendor Total: $42500 DELL MARKETING LP XK18DR9K5 COMPUTER ACCESSORIES AND $59.03 80026130-54102 SMALL TOOLS $59.03 SUPPL XK189JJC8 COMPUTER ACCESSORIES AND $565.90 80026130-54102 SMALL TOOLS $565.90 SUPPL XK18W6XR5 COMPUTER ACCESSORIES AND $946.61 80026130-54102 SMALL TOOLS $946.61 SUPPL Vendor Total: $1,571.54 DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES INV080916 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL $415.00 77725200-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $415.00 CONTROL AUDIT SERVICES Vendor Total: $415.00 DIALED IN ATHLETICS 1347 2016 ADULT BASKETBALL $132.55 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.14) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.57) 10022821-54100 SUPPLIES $0.71 10022821-54100 SUPPLIES $132.55 Vendor Total: $132.55 EFFICIENCY SERVICES GROUP 1185 ADMIN OF EUD PUBLIC BENEFITS $3,957.71 80626500-52137 PUBLIC BENEFITS PROGRAM $3,957.71 LLC P MGMT Vendor Total: $3,957.71 EPIC AVIATION LLC 6892263 JET FUEL AS NEEDED $10,150.55 77725200-58401 AVIATION FUEL $10,150.55 6892360 JET FUEL AS NEEDED $13,683.39 77725200-58401 AVIATION FUEL $13,683.39 Vendor Total: $23,833.94 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL L0275684 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $35.00 82024411.52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $35.00 INC ORGANIC,N L0276899 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $680.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $680.00 ORGANIC,N 1.,,ist Iu;Nf 111.'41,nlIks 11PrIll,ashl, u " i"i „ Nall Illn i.1, � I p@11 '� �vvirri ��� i III. I�iII 101 IIIIIIII f�� a aP ✓'lyd� ,rrc o YIp�� rrmY A 1 iiYo p u�u (f u u po�I EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL L02771151 fl WATER TESITINGIIII IITOTAL li Ilwari�afl� "'Il�$685 00 Y�820244111.52100 li Ilm uC`Iu IRA C: V'J^'91S SERVICES �I I CrI�Nf �� I�IIIII Ill�lllllll. lIW a1111111u a Vw Ili 11 a nlilllll llll 11111m 1f,J I1I /� CONTRACTED SERVICES $685.00 INC ORGANIC,N Vendor Total: $1,400.00 FISHER WIRELESS SVCS INC 7705 RADIO COMMUNICATION $3,324.85 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $1,108.27 EQUIPMENT, 80100000-80100 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT $2216.58 Vendor Total: $3,324.85 GCS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIP 14092 PARTS&SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $699.24 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $699.24 SRVS Vendor Total: $699.24 GHD INC 68055 TRANSPORTATION $2,921.50 25024210-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $2921.50 IMPROVEMENTS RE 68178 TRANSPORTATION $22,834.92 25024210-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $22,834.92 IMPROVEMENTS RE Vendor Total: $25,756.42 GREEN VALLEY CONSULTING 7820 SUMMER 2015 STREET $797.50 25124421-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $797.50 ENGINEERS RECONSTRUCT Vendor Total: $797.50 HARRIS COMPUTER SYSTEMS CT030103 CONTRACTED SERVICES $735.00 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $735.00 INC Vendor Total: $735.00 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1180321 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $183.75 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $183.75 NEED REPAIR 2021925 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $28.00 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $28.00 NEED 1042319 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $44.26 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $44.26 NEED 1122900 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $119.61 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $119.61 NEED 8123389 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $12.89 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $12.89 NEED IIImmii t. 111„f irheAs YT;11,;,11;::7.,1' nted f ''''n IPir" a II *n 11 II ''" , 1111 iui ,icies .,„i;mY1f ri f(Il ilmlpi 1�1,�YPI � Yr9/� Ul l�� r '� no �:r7"Ultll�0. 1�rpl I,r,l IVI I��@U rw f�I' ������� ����� ��I��Y,� �w�n������������1 din ��I�� �i�� �u� � �� J�1111111 �1��� �-n« ��, 1�� �. HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 8111833 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $376.06 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $376.06 NEED Vendor Total: $764.57 HOMEMADE PUBLICATIONS 12175 MENDOCINO TRAVELERS GUIDE $2,000.00 75017110-52515 ADVERTISING&PUBLICATION $2,000.00 SUMMER/FALL 2016 Vendor Total: $2,000.00 INFOSEND INC 108171 UB PRINT&MAIL SERVICES $3,461.65 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,461.65 108954 UB PRINT&MAIL SERVICES $4,581.40 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $4,581.40 Vendor Total: $8,043.05 ITS GROUP INC 1111787F STANDARD SERVICE LABOR. $3,500.00 82024411-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $3,500.00 HIGHS REPAIR Vendor Total: $3,500.00 JAVIER F JACINTO 00582 EQUIPMENT SERVICE& $650.00 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $650.00 REPAIRS-RIGHT BUMPER#3001 Vendor Total: $650.00 JENNIFER HIGBEE DV 082416 REGISTRATION $155.00 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $155.00 REIMBURSEMENT Vendor Total: $155.00 JESSE MEUSCHKE DV 082216 CONCERT FOOD VOUCHER $51.00 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $51.00 REIMBURSEMENT Vendor Total: $51.00 JUDY CHAN SEPT-16 SEPT-16 RENT:185 MASON $1,365.00 10022100-52600 RENT $1,365.00 STREET Vendor Total: $1,365.00 JUMPERZ INC DV 082216 EQUIPMENT RENTAL $290.00 10520214-54100 SUPPLIES $290.00 Vendor Total: $290.00 KATHY MCGRADE 8603 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $94.55 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $94.55 REPAIRS List of Checks Presented it Approval on 9/2/2016 Invokes Godo ,/Name hi e , eotte iert Invoke Account KATHY MCGRADE 8562 FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT $421.30 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $421.30 AND 8537 FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT $600.00 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $600.00 AND Vendor Total: $1,115.85 KENNETH RONK TA 09/13- TRAVEL ADVANCE $1,050.00 77725200-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $1,050.00 09/17/16 Vendor Total: $1,050.00 '.. KENWOOD ENERGY UKIAH-PV- SOLAR PARKING CANOPY $740.00 80100000-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $740.00 150801 Vendor Total: $740.00 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 64000254155 MISCELLANEOUS TIRE 5586.99 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $586.99 SERVICES AS 64000253589 MISCELLANEOUS TIRE $972.03 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $972.03 SERVICES AS Vendor Total: $1,559.02 LINDLEY ROBERTSON NEF007 LABOR COMPLIANCE SERVICES $3,000.00 31022700-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,000.00 Vendor Total: $3,000.00 LORELEI SCOTT 3835 MOONLIGHT MOVIE MADNESS $937.95 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $937.95 ADVERTISING Vendor Total: $937.95 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 13898508 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $142.95 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.66) NEED 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $0.66 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $142.95 Vendor Total: $142.95 MATTHEW MICHAEL COUGHLIN DV 082216 INSTRUCTOR $1,540.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,540.00 Vendor Total: $1,540.00 I0„mill,s blls ,1111u1r ,u n11::,1 Si %m1" Ip ��� :III 1111: -u° � r „11H'Ill IIIII"IIII, 1111 lies u li,11„�,U,o6,oil /o11111111",v,.Y.ull401111111111111111111l1 ,1it 1TM1(�lIrwIrII l�II�I1pNW J,hl ryp,ruit U/Iml I»IIIIIIIu",J, lm i'll,I(IG,, r triU/I<truP,fgm.illpI�iiy,',,,m II,I�;IgIm I,II JImln�j �uJi1urIIpuI p�"(v:„1u1i1,i1IIirc1:1 In IIiI��IIa�I,II IIIiiiIp1I ry�.0Ili�, I1na11111"W�1+1111(I(I(1 MENDO MILL&LUMBER CO K31761/I SUPPLIES-DEAD BOLT $35.67 10022100-59400 OTHER EXPENSES $35.67 Vendor Total: $35.67 MENDOCINO COUNTY AIR INV070916 ANNUAL PERMIT RENEWAL FOR $248.10 77725200-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $248.10 QUALITY MANAGEMENT FACILTY#5092 Vendor Total: $248.10 MENDOCINO COUNTY FARM 429421 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $121.15 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $121.15 SUPPLY AS REQ REPAIR 429344 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $29.13 70024500-54100 SUPPLIES $29.13 AS REQ Vendor Total: $150.28 MICROFLEX CORP#774353 IN1683090 XL SUPPLIES-BLACK GLOVES:M-L- $338.97 10520210-54201 PRISONER EXPENSE $338.97 Vendor Total: $338.97 MMANC 05419 MMANC ANNUAL CONFERENCE $450.00 10013400-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $450.00 Vendor Total: $450.00 MUNISERVICES LLC 0000042609 SALES TAX AUDIT REPORTING $625.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $625.00 SERV 0000042550 PRBUSIE OCENGNSSISS LICENSE $972.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $972.00 Vendor Total: $1,597.00 NOR-CAL PUMP&WELL #2 SPEC 16-01 INSTALL WELL 4&9 $3,945.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $3,94500 DRILLING INC 2 SPEC 16-01 INSTALL WELL 4&9 $32,826.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $32,826.00 Vendor Total: $36,771.00 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR DV 082516 DEPOSIT RETURN:ALEX $300.00 10022100-46350 PLAZA RENTAL $300.00 THOMAS PLAZA 09/20/16 DV 082216 RECREATION CLASS REFUND $110.00 10022800-44915 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOME $110.00 114484-9 UTILITIES REFUND $97.12 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $97.12 Lill Ht ilif 4„;h,,:,.,,°i,''''1 r Euii ' forjli prill of va i „,1� '11,11,20111)1.„4 in ll'1rii leu 1Iiri, 1.114(.:.om r�lI �U `�I'��uGl I ImI@ y°I II cufII V f IrIII 7u 1 saufiII 0 "I 111111 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR 114008-6 UTILITIES REFUND $150.13 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $150.131 ;:,',"6,,117.11„1111„ 1000111111111111111 i�I 1� lIOlblS jjllldIIi IIISIlI: IIo�aIIrVendor Total: $657.25 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S5210209.002 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND $37838 80000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $378.38 mIorl SUPPL $5234302.001 PARTS AS NEEDED $136.45 80026110-54100 SUPPLIES $136.45 Vendor Total: $514.83 PACE SUPPLY CORPORATION 023448122 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $98.65 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.15) NEEDED 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.51) 10022100-59400 OTHER EXPENSES $0.66 10022100-59400 OTHER EXPENSES $98.65 023390011-4 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT, $8.11 82000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $8.11 FIXTURES, Vendor Total: $106.76 PAPA DV 082216 QAC SEMINAR REGISTRATION $320.00 10022100-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $80.00 10022100-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $80.00 10022100-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $80.00 10022100-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $80.00 DV 081616 QAC SEMINAR REGISTRATION $80.00 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $80.00 Vendor Total: $400.00 PETERSON TRUCKS INC CM258309P PARTS AS NEEDED ($52.57) 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES ($52.57) 260324P PARTS AS NEEDED $98.76 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $98.76 J h u.1, k Pras I iiu t. ,,L:mor , iii,. , r,"i 11 + 'rJ8 NuPo lu l�, uu .4, ����� °i� `��1�: 106341,0„ uimifii miiou �aV,d�o���AN ��1, :111 PETERSON TRUCKS INC 260792P PARTS A NEEDED $124,79 20324100-58510 REIMBRSABLEJOBS $124.79 Vendor Total: $170.98 PORTOLA SYSTEMS INC 33742 I.T.SERVICES AS NEEDED $761.25 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $761.25 Vendor Total: $761.25 POWER INDUSTRIES INC 715133 PARTS AS NEEDED $79.31 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $79.31 Vendor Total: $79.31 PR BUSHBY SHARPENING INC 914156 SUPPLIES-HEDGE TRIMMER $65.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.07) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.33) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($4.88) 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $5.28 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $65.00 Vendor Total: $65.00 PR DIAMOND PRODUCTS INC 0042096-IN SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $309.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.37) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($1.47) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($22.05) 20324100-54100 SUPPLIES $23.89 20324100-54100 SUPPLIES $309.00 0042276-IN SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $716.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.85) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($3.44) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($51.53) 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $55.82 List 111 etr."11,,.,o41 .17° Pr"3,1 „Imbed 11Fd1'.111r11)1 1,11°1;°n w 111111 11,E 7.:, ";'11016 I,n%tr1IFI 4 rol �� rrn11(I�JId 111111 IIll B011b- rttLy( r�m///,� pG°° Jy( pp y ��� 111,111;11"i1111?VII�( �� �lllllllrrrrrrri����� ip�m�� �uPini,Hi�u iiiiil� 'lf�� li� II� luluuul�rl�mii% 1° �uo�Hiimoii�luiD �liuim�1ol �� 111111JJ1J Ili udi illi of °o hio (dill m ��������� ��J Iii oil1111,1111111111111111111111111111111111 1 11111( PR DIAMOND PRODUCTS INC 0042278-IN SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $716.00 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $716.00 Vendor Total: $1,025.00 PUBLIC FINANCIAL 68598 FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES $5,603.40 10015100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $5,603.40 MANAGEMENT Vendor Total: $5,603.40 R EMMETT JONES JULY2016 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY $4,275.00 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $4,275.00 SERVICES 2 Vendor Total: $4,275.00 RAU&ASSOCIATES INC 201600146 DESIGN&PREP OF PLANS FOR $6,347.50 25124210-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $6,347.50 SMI Vendor Total: $6,347.50 '.. READY SET GO LLC 76402 FINANCE PROJECT ASSISTANCE $3,956.25 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,347.50 84424422-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,608.75 Vendor Total: $3,956.25 REDWOOD EMPIRE TITLE DV 083116 ESCROW DEPOSIT $1,000.00 25100000-39010 RESERVED ADA RAMPS FUND $1,000.00 COMPANY BALANC Vendor Total: $1,000.00 SWINE COUNTRY BBQ& DV 081916 SUMMER CONCERTS 2016 $349.50 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $349.50 GOURMET GRILL Vendor Total: $349.50 SAFEWAY INC 804829-072416-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $10.04 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $10.04 1583 AS REQ 806505-073116-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $30.71 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $30.71 1583 AS REQ 803351-072416-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $64.82 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $64.82 1583 AS REQ 806015-072916-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $78.95 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $78.95 1583 AS REQ 801141-081116-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $227.90 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $227.90 1583 AS REQ ILIA�Wm '�Iir-ri ;l,nn Ana Ilui , , leunifteill 1'',,..1.1 �0.11 pr., riill on 2, ,,, 1011;',',11,..:11 iu iifl i i ii mi dh+�;i ii diiIIii i iui iii a iiliio i l ,„ �i uo a iiI iI11u m u mVii Pk��I0� 1u 1 I@��ii ', mG �lll III IIJII �I�o ������� ���w�N PK ���%H�71�'� 7,.i � iimii'mi�i �„l ui i0oliuu mIIIiI11 ,1,111D1J1 SAFEWAY INC 802178-072116-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $45.98 10016100-54167 HR-EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT $45.98 1583 AS REQ 802771- MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $32.76 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $32.76 0722016-1583 AS REQ 805042-072516-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $108.06 10010000-54100 SUPPLIES $108.06 1583 AS REQ 800669-071816-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $57.66 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $57.66 1583 AS REQ 809413-080816-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $69.12 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $69.12 1583 AS REQ 434239-081116-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $81.81 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $81.81 1583 AS REQ 807099-172816-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $96.63 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $96.63 1583 AS REQ 433737-072216-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $158.27 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $158.27 1583 AS REQ 809957-071116-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $158.37 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $158.37 1583 AS REQ 435779-072616-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $187.46 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $187.46 1583 AS REQ 803630-072516-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $3.49 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $3.49 1583 AS REQ 725357-072816-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $15.11 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $1511 1583 AS REQ 724204-072616-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $17.62 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $17.62 1583 AS REQ 808996-080216-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $28.44 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $28.44 1583 AS REQ 430090-080316-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $50.31 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $50.31 1583 AS REQ 721117-081116-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $75.66 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $75.66 1583 AS REQ 808354-073116-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $290.29 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $290.29 1583 AS REQ 804951-072516-MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $31.18 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $31.18 1583 AS REQ Vendor Total: $1,920.64 6 Lit 41o,0 Ill IIC: r~r„,1n.tim";1111„mor ppr: tri all I ...................._..."Li 2(1 1111,11111t IN.„loaH .,/l I.. 1 I�IIIU10000I�f1Ul�lll e1,i1u� 0I ,Ir p(/pinp�i�Vull �/{i lei ruxY 0m,upWiliii ,l mrulo �nNl.iuWr1111:1!111�ir 1ui ry�Iraiih ipie Yril111111111111111111111 loo1nf1;V;( 7ttyuaYlU.I, T1, low w wdWrruilyyrUm!hF.al nr1Ip:ri il ; li111,1T� 1illll riridmui(viii :1 I IU�I��irin. SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE AR17-00224 EVOC TRAINING $2,838.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $2,838.00 AR17-00218 EVOC TRAINING $3,074.50 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $3,074.50 Vendor Total: $5,912.50 SHARON KATE GOULD DV 082216 INSTRUCTOR $1481.20 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,481.20 Vendor Total: $1,481.20 SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL 2062.R HAZ WASTE BIN RENTAL AND $1,493.40 80026400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,493.40 RESOURCES INC DISPO Vendor Total: $1,493.40 SILVA SEPTIC INC 64690 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL $183.81 10024220-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $183.81 Vendor Total: $183.81 SONOMA MEDIA INVESTMENTS 2752001 EMPLOYMENT AD:CSR I $1,065.00 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $1,065.00 LLC Vendor Total: $1,065.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 183813 CHEM TEST/SUPPORT CRIMINAL $315.00 10520210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $315.00 INV Vendor Total: $315.00 STATE WATER RESOURCES 12982 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT $60.00 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $60.00 CONTROL BOARD OPERATOR CERT RENEWAL Vendor Total: $60.00 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC RG2222751 MOONLIGHT MOVIE MADNESS $578.00 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $578.00 2016 Vendor Total: $578.00 SYAR INDUSTRIES INC 611782 ASPHALT AS NEEDED $660.87 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $660.87 Vendor Total: $660.87 TAPCO 1535825 SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $963.41 10024220-54127 PW-SIGN POSTS/SHEETING $963.41 Vendor Total: $963.41 �l° °� Iclks pr„sen , f�o ,ppr..;,l11II I� � '�, 1 (( Invokes r.,,, ®rr4llilli ir!Y !%u! 11//((((((III�� 1», OUi, r m ��,,,fP� 'IU�„(h ffUrt ri 1 ( (( III,„rlillld ui mreem ((( r.r�,,, u» VO �m�ii lll��l�^' ii�llll�llll m ei filIDu," uuuo iiii �m a iotliii l mwD ii mi til 1,110, llllll�Il���MM 9 1 61111 41111'1 1'lp fi n 0$1101 ���M,R m1 44,a �uU p o of E i ui a AID Hi 1m mum m Vuo 00'hi ioi iii ,,r1'1P TIM POMA DV 082816 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT $47.77 10022810-54100 SUPPLIES $47.77 Vendor Total: $47.77 TMG UTILITY ADVISORY 301605016 CIS IMPLEMENTATION PROJ $18,972.00 22013300-80100 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT $18,972.00 SERVICES INC ASSESS Vendor Total: $18,972.00 UKIAH DAILY JOURNAL 0000987891.0 JULY 2016 ADVERTISING $2,825.99 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $100.00 90000000-23243 FAMILY FUN IN THE SUN $100.00 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $588.85 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $1,106.79 80026400-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $630.35 SUBSCRIPTIONS 90000000-23219 PUMPKINFEST $100.00 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $100.00 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $100.00 0000987891 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATIONS $928.65 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $50.00 FY 1 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $50.00 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $65.28 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $70.83 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $73.61 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $77.78 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $66.67 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $125.00 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $167.10 InID, ,,ii IrImU11�r :l1,NI EA.ilm ^li�'lL VI 1VIIIIIIa.�,;w �� OUilIiry �NJI IL'h91i�1�i� iIIIll �l , 111"11u111lllr 21 ID� � ffuu , UKIAH DAILY JOURNAL 0000987891 GL NOTICE PUBLICATIONS $928.6 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $169.27,,.. 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $13.11 Vendor Total: $3,754.64 UKIAH MAIN STREET PROGRAM DV 082216 MOONLIGHT MOVIE MADNESS $162.00 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $162.00 2016 Vendor Total: $162.00 UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY 460518 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $84.35 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $84.35 N 460595 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $272.42 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $272.42 N 460482 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $131.31 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $131.31 N 1460278 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $67,99 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $67.99 N 14559773 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $252.59 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $252.59 N 460476 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $203.12 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $203.12 N 460039 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $66.99 20822500-54100 SUPPLIES $66.99 N 1460360 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $91.90 20822500-54100 SUPPLIES $91.90 N 1460276 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $94.83 20822500-54100 SUPPLIES $94.83 N 1460141 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $177.11 20822500-54100 SUPPLIES $177.11 N 1460396 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $75.58 20824300-54100 SUPPLIES $75.58 N 1459875 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $80.54 31122870-54100 SUPPLIES $80.54 N 1460464 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $133.21 31122870-54100 SUPPLIES $133.21 N 1460751 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $104.88 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $104.88 N � � .Listch c „; Presui ted 0 1,1ri2 111,46 VIII( 'n»>111rJlii/%%%%/rrrvr,,,,.01111041.''''''''''' ,iilD iJNii00uf uu�r.o. r�m¢oi oIf l,oinill ��rrr Luivh�n'i o rmivo luV I,1,,1" iiN' mii lui� g � 1p11,1 ,iuui UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY 460502 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $229.12 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $229.12 N 1459660 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $483.71 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $483.71 N 1460402 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $254.82 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $254.82 N 1459698 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $54.05 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $54.05 N 1460434 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $114.16 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $114.16 N 1459696 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $316.70 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $316.70 N 460783 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,MISC AS $24.38 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $24.38 N Vendor Total: $3,313.76 UKIAH TROPHIES&GIFTS 259749 SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $40.55 10022821-54100 SUPPLIES $40.55 Vendor Total: $40.55 UKIAH WASTE SOLUTIONS INC 317930 BIOSOLID REMOVAL $4,414.56 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $4,414.56 Vendor Total: $4,414.56 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 994122 TRUSTEE FEES 05101-07/31/16 $1,181.00 10015100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $875.00 96995601-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $153.00 96995669-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $153.00 Vendor Total: $1,181.00 UNITED SITE SERVICES 114-4323983 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL $166.78 10022100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $166.78 114-4323984 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL $166.78 10022100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $166.78 114-4323985 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL $166.78 10022100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $166.78 114-4323986 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL $166.78 10022100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $166.78 List 11,, ° Irests, m in111,7 l 11Nnvoic s " mu ih�l i:u lJgp IW°�1 11y11 111111,111 9I1 uur y UNITED SITE SERVICES 114-4336065 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL $249.19 10022100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $249.19 Vendor Total: $916.31 UPS 0000E19R5434 SHIPPING SERVICES $116.72 10023320-54101 POSTAGE $5.95 6 10023320-54101 POSTAGE $7.05 10023320-54101 POSTAGE $28.01 10023320-54101 POSTAGE $45.77 80026200-54100 SUPPLIES $29.94 Vendor Total: $116.72 US CELLULAR 0149561933 MOBILE PHONES $569.83 80026400-55100 TELEPHONE $16.92 80026400-55100 TELEPHONE $537.95 82024410-55100 TELEPHONE $3.74 84024421-55100 TELEPHONE $3.74 84024425-55100 TELEPHONE $7.48 Vendor Total: $569.83 WALMART COMMUNITY JULY-16 STMT MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $397.62 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $5.63 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $27.30 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $6.58 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $20.16 10022810-54100 SUPPLIES $24.08 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $10.75 20922900-54100 SUPPLIES $96.27 70024500-54100 SUPPLIES $5.22 List of CII11113 i IIIYr F )% n�"aIn 9/2711.10 10..1°� in„1 rill s uIl(I�DppDI�o�(wflD)bi�����Irnu�l u� Ih ,,.��I� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ���� OOOOOOOOOOOO111I1Ir /4/mn,1N11�111 01,411u,DU 1,0I, �rn�lgq�ll�IYIuI�lI�pi�u��lApu i���i�l�V��l.l�.,lluu�lplm�",Ny,,,my��{{�hw��IUllIlL@@ll.11pp-lllr�lul j��NYYL� 10001111I1 WALMART COMMUNITY JULY-16 STMT MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $397.62 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $19.60 80026120-54100 SUPPLIES $123.26 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $0.47 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $31.23 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $12.52 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $14.55 Vendor Total: $397.62 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC 891215 SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $174.64 80000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $174.64 887782 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND $1,030.22 80000000-12104 INVENTORY PURCHASES $1,030.22 SUPPL 878044 CLOTHING ACCESSORIES(SEE $90.46 80026110-54100 SUPPLIES $90.46 CLAS 876752 CLOTHING ACCESSORIES(SEE $361.83 80026110-54100 SUPPLIES $381.83 CLAS 869672 CLOTHING ACCESSORIES(SEE $452.29 80026110-54100 SUPPLIES $452.29 CLAS Vendor Total: $2,109.44 WYVERN RESTAURANTS INC 30375 PIZZA FOR WELL 9 $55.12 82024410-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $55.12 024882 MOONLIGHT MOVIE MADNESS $31.88 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $31.88 2016 02-4797 MOONLIGHT MOVIE MADNESS $37.00 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $37.00 2016 Vendor Total: $124.00 ZAB ENTERPRISES INC STMT071316 PROVIDE MISCELLANOUS FOOD $62.38 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $62.38 DISH Vendor Total: $62.38 INVOICE TOTAL: $263,395.98 List r Checks I�.1°' e sent;1 10 �F p r� � „A ffi :1 gyp „ li6 The fopllowprn host f[lla Ip y blfe was rev e ed and IpIprov d for p yment. JIgnature 'kes 1,111 ;;!'„;„Illii*10:010fiiiiigi100,iicooll,I,4iiii*e.o*fiii„HinolA,011101,'„',',ii0(01#001iiio:00:040,11,04,:,10041t014,§0010411!0 ACCOUNTEMPS 46473814 TEMPORARY SERVICES- $1,080.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $270.00 PURCHASIN 20413500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $810.00 Vendor Total: $1,080.00 ACCURATE AIR ENGINEERING 1-067342 SIGHT GLASS KIT $436.47 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $436.47 INC. REPAIR Vendor Total: $436.47 ALL-GUARD ALARM SYSTEMS A86722 MONTHLY MONITORING OF $74.00 84024425-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $74.00 INC WWTP Vendor Total: $74.00 ALLEN JAMES DV082916 INSTRUCTOR $680.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $680.00 Vendor Total: $680.00 '1DREW PHILLIPS TA 09/27/16 TRAVEL ADVANCE $1,267.07 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $1,267.07 Vendor Total: $1,267.07 ANTONIO MUNOZ CFM092016 EDUCATIONAL/TRAINING $333.33 10521210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $333.33 SERVICES Vendor Total: $333.33 AT&T AUG16 911 SYSTEM $223.51 20620231-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $223.51 Vendor Total: $223.51 f "111,11, f1)1111111. 41:4pprly,1„1,,1-at 4311111 11,'111„ I .Q' es �iPh iIN NII�IIIIIIIIIIIhMII W(a� �NNIYyul�lpl91� lllll��i IIIIW141� uU Yhq( yliVllooP oq(N°N NJ duI �tl'U;�' i 4"uoq'IWpppp�R�(uui I v 4Pk H°11fiV��e) i-iili Vide,„r pi o II uW''u ruu llllllllllu[1111;11u hioA IOuVIIOVII�LI�V�,i��aI �0111�uiulminuflon�u�I�ii����uiiiuiiBuou�io Io�iluMoom iOnl�o�uiuiuuu��H n� ���Hh�oiiiuVuu �������������� AUDREY JACOBSEN DV083016 CONCERT FOOD VOUCHER $60.00 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $60.00 REIMBURSEMENT Vendor Total: $60.00 B&H VIDEO 113817512 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS $191.93 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX—LIBRARIES ($0.24) (NOT OT 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX—MEASURE S ($0.96) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($14.40) 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $0.08 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $0.32 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $4.80 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $91.17 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $0.08 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $0.32 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $4.80 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $9.59 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $0.08 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $0.32 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $4.80 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $91.17 113807625 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS $1,995.76 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX—LIBRARIES ($2.50) (NOT OT 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX—MEASURES ($9.98) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($149.69) 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $0.84 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $3.33 u Lilt�n� y, � ':f 1+�"�"�, 40': . ' iiia° q�u,� ,„:,,„u� ,u�,d, F ,1:r A111,7' .r.iv illi w�u, 115, � ","”" �� � � ,, h pI -"ISI(, IIc: "�"� IIVI� �i olll�!�� I� �������� �� �������iui�i�i �i����l�l�l�� ����������.�i iN.log000 ,111 i����°;lig„1i�,r1 ipm 1m . ,11�������11�������� ���� 8&H VIDEO 113807625 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS $1,995.76 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $49.90 (NOT OT 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $947.83 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $0.84 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $3.33 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $49.90 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $100.10 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $0.82 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $3.32 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $49.89 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $947.83 Vendor Total: $2,187.69 BELKORP AG 285510 PARTS $213.70 10022100-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $213.70 REPAIR Vendor Total: $213.70 BOUTIN JONES INC 95103 LEGAL RETAINER FOR UVSD $6,208.22 84424422-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $6,208.22 LITIGA Vendor Total: $6,208.22 CANTEEN SERVICE 9196 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $77.25 10011100-54100 SUPPLIES $77.25 NEED 9060 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $71.26 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $71.26 NEED Vendor Total: $148.51 CLARK PEST CONTROL STMT 7/31/16 PEST CONTROL SVCS $140.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $140.00 Vendor Total: $140.00 COATINGS 8 SUNDRIES INC N0105994 Paints,Traffic $2,238.19 10024220-54125 PW-.TRAFFIC PAINT $2,238.19 Vendor Total: $2,238.19 Ill 1,11111 es 11,1;i0iiiiiiii 11,10001, N1,P1100Pi1111(I(I� ,�, iiiid 0 ,1,„1,,,10,111, �� ;�o;��������n���' l '��w°���,61111,1,11,U1,1e1,'iii ill,- 1„,!1III1114 COMCAST AUG16 INTERNET SERVICE $152.31 73022600-55100 TELEPHONE $152.31 Vendor Total: $152.31 COMPUTER OPTIONS INC BILL40921 IT SERVICES $12,150.00 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $12,150.00 Vendor Total: $12,150.00 DANIEL STEEL 8,MACHINE INC 13633 DRILL MOTOR REPAIR $75.00 80026330-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $75.00 Vendor Total: $75.00 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY 300275.1 SECURITY SYSTEM AT $39.95 10022100-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $39.95 OBSERVATORY 300275 ALARM SERVICES AS REQUIRED $481.35 10022100-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $56.90 10022822-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $22.95 20822500-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $42.95 20824300-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $27.25 69122700-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $85.90 73022600-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $41.90 73022600-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $74.90 80026400-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $24.50 82024411-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $44.95 82024414-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $29.57 84024421-52180 SECURITY SERVICES $29.58 Vendor Total: $521.30 EDMO DISTRIBUTORS INC 1412662 SUPPLIES $251.84 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $251.84 Vendor Total: $251.84 iiiii �a, r� � �� ,'111,„,;,1,„ Olo IID'r � ���...l � l^o � Ir I � , A,� i 9�rir m /1/"' 1.11,1:,11 In r o i, „s �{ �omii � ��u�u��u o o,VWro,,o, �m�1dm�l,u':o° �IIIIIII"Iml�° � ;,,lh i,o,�i�11;111;111;111;111;111;11111�������,1,la 04"n1u: i',mmmd'ii 7miii111111 iioH ���iui f iiN„ � EPIC AVIATION LLC 6896345 JET FUEL $10,260.86 77725200-58401 AVIATION FUEL $10,260.86 Vendor Total: $10,260.86 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL L0277458 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $105.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $105.00 INC ORGANIC,N L0277469 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $120.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $120.00 ORGANIC,N L0276907 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $150.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $150.00 ORGANIC,N L0277948 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $195.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $195.00 ORGANIC,N Vendor Total: $570.00 FASTENAL CAUKA22444 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $277.79 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $277.79 REPAIR CAUKA22546 SAFETY SUPPLIES $484.81 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $484.81 Vendor Total: $762.60 FEDERAL EXPRESS 5-519-01663 SHIPPING CHARGES $350.96 10013400-54101 POSTAGE $28.61 10013400-54101 POSTAGE $39.20 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $19.96 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $19.96 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $19.96 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $24.39 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $24.51 10520210.54101 POSTAGE $33.40 20513300-54101 POSTAGE $86.67 77725200-54101 POSTAGE $19.96 83024430-54100 SUPPLIES $8.50 List "If Checks V e � r'o or IIID SIC c ° III iintlic,ms 1,14,100'n nigninn, FEDERAL EXPRESS &519-01663 SHIPPING CHARGES $350.96 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $11.42 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $14.42 010:41014010•11.4.1:::111A1 Vendor Total: $350.96 FELIPE CHAVEZ DV082916 INSTURCTOR $840.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $840.00 Vendor Total: $840.00 GHD INC 69149 TRANSPORTATION $1,844.35 25024210-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $1,844.35 IMPROVEMENTS RE Vendor Total: $1,844.35 GINA GRECO DV090216 INSTRUCTOR $2,100.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,100.00 Vendor Total: $2,100.00 GOLDEN STATE EMERGENCY CO004499 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $52.56 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.05) VEHICLE SERVICE INC 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $0.05 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $52.56 CO004530 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $107.57 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.11) 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $0.11 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $107.57 Vendor Total: $180.13 GOVERNMENT FINANCE 2825468 REGISTRATION $70.00 10013400-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $70.00 OFFICERS ASSOC Vendor Total: $70.00 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 1033267 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $102.63 10024220-54121 PW-ASPHALT CONCRETE $102.63 COMPANY MATERIA 1036178 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $64.16 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $64.16 MATERIA Lii:t f lqn7 h exit r .„ r '„ / /21001))16 it11111 A0111101.AollIM0004:40,0,01,1'4(miimm 417,tp#400$41,1111,1ii,01„11„„ood '',,,11,11100,000,110,1r„to GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 1031376 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $96.74 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $96.74 COMPANY MATERIA 1036196 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $229.79 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $229.79 MATERIA 1033286 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $617.00 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $158.54 MATERIA 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $150.21 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $150.95 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $157.30 1035120 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $112.29 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $112.29 MATERIA 1032023 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $641.22 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $641.22 NEEDE Vendor Total: $1,863.83 GREG BLANCETT DV090216 MEMBERSHIP AND CERTIFICATE $300.00 84024425-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $300.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $300.00 GRILL BROS PARTNERSHIP 238310-2 EQUIPMENT&MACHINERY $129.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $129.00 RENTAL A Vendor Total: $129.00 HACH COMPANY 10078043 FLAT RATE ANNUAL REPAIR FEE $843.99 82024411-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $843.99 REPAIR Vendor Total: $843.99 HANSEL FORD CM1087349F MISC PARTS&MATERIALS AS ($38.06) 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES ($38.06) NEED 1087349F MISC PARTS&MATERIALS AS $422.82 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $422.82 NEED Vendor Total: $384.76 IDE)0(DISTRIBUTION INC 3006632372 SUPPLIES $44.35 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $44.35 Vendor Total: $44.35 INTEGRITY SHRED 61614 DOCUMENT SHREDDING $28.50 10016100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $28.50 Lisiiit w" �a. Ihell Ilcs 11Il rii0„ ,^,,,lint,',1:11 'i rir i'iii 1,011.11111, ;1100 iii°rii11 111/ 1 11111: ,1 ;;, 1IIGiii^ °�w �r ° ,11 ,41i1,40,1„:1,1�,1,111 „110! 111111111 � u „l looi II Agi*kji lolliiigo k'�;« , ' , ory 1 INTEGRITY SHRED 61615 DOCUMENT SHREDDING $57.00 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $28.50 20620231-54100 SUPPLIES $28.50 Vendor Total: $85.50 JAROD THIELE DV083116 REIMBURSE MEALS FOR $65.72 82024414-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $65.72 EMERGENCY HYDRANT REPAIR Vendor Total: $65.72 JIM EDDIE DV082216 REIMBURSE FOR BACKFLOW $180.00 82024414-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $180.00 LICENSE Vendor Total: $180.00 JOHN AGUILAR DV082216 REIMBURSE FOR WATER CLASS $99.00 82024414-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $99.00 Vendor Total: $99.00 JOHN HAMNER dv083016 WATER DISTRIBUTION REVIEW $150.00 82024410-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $75.00 REGISTRATION 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $75.00 Vendor Total: $150.00 JOSIE CASTANON TA 09/23/16 TRAVEL ADVANCE $61.56 20620231-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $61.56 Vendor Total: $61.56 LYLE VALADOR DV090116 BOOT ALLOWANCE $129.75 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $129.75 Vendor Total: $129.75 MEL GRANDI DV082916 REIMBURSE FOR TEST LEADS $52.37 80026200-54100 SUPPLIES $52.37 Vendor Total: $52.37 MISAC 200000617 MEMBERSHIP $420.00 20922900-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $420.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $420.00 111.irit gf CI ir xks IF1H oro. iiii 1L„,11,, r AP Pr 101 Inv ices 00Diu1,1,1o,Po' o k0,H,40,:.„04111,71,11.1 411 ; ooly;i11m4^1�IIR1 �0iyvsee Ili MOI RS 131750 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $30.45 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $30.45 SUPPLIES AS 132635 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $86.42 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $86.42 SUPPLIES AS CHEMICAL 132918 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $172.83 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $172.83 SUPPLIES AS CHEMICAL 131533 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $216.04 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $216.04 SUPPLIES AS CHEMICAL 133232 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $302.45 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $302.45 SUPPLIES AS CHEMICAL 133579 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $302.45 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $302.45 SUPPLIES AS CHEMICAL 131936 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $345.66 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $345.66 SUPPLIES AS CHEMICAL 132938 MISCELLANEOUS POOL $345.66 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $345.66 SUPPLIES AS CHEMICAL Vendor Total: $1,801.96 NCPA SEPT-16 SEPT-16 NCPA $720,467.00 80026300-58104 NCPA MANAGEMENT SERVICES $50,298.00 80026300-58101 NCPA PLANT GENERATION $153,477.00 80026300-58102 NCPA POWER PURCHASES $388,260.00 80026300-58105 NCPA THIRD PARTY SALES ($13,296.00) 80026300-58103 NCPA TRANSMISSION $143,728.00 Vendor Total: $720,467.00 NFP NATIONAL ACCOUNT SEPT-16 SEPT16 NFP INSURANCE $2,892.05 20700000-20523 P/R DEDUCT-LTD $2,613.05 SERVICES 20700000-20512 REMIF LIFE $31.00 20700000-20512 REMIF LIFE $248.00 Vendor Total: $2,892.05 NORTHERN TOOL&EQUIPMENT 35992815 PARTS AS NEEDED $656.10 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.70) List n IFCkie ��Iw �l�u II":1 iiiirtt ash „,n. 14�I.iii�� � T�mh��l� on ! ,,o6,�''�� g,p.II ��gBNNuuuu ,t1! ,V 0 ��4 ®:A�ilmti+r�" pti ni mu�-1� �� ���� ��i , ��� �udm�6�„i��w 1up'1R � NORTHERN TOOL&EQUIPMENT 35992815 PARTS AS NEEDED $656.10 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($2.81) 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $45.66 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $656.10 REPAIR 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($42.15) Vendor Total: $656.10 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR DV082516 2016 SWIM LESSONS REFUND $60.00 10022300-44910 SWIMMING POOL $60.00 108980-4 UTILITY REFUND $66.50 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $66.50 Vendor Total: $126.50 OPPERMAN&SON INC 1262290037 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $91.42 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $91.42 NEEDED 1262440086 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $256.88 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $256.88 NEEDED 1262240029 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $241.89 10022500-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $241.89 NEEDED 1262170051 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $9.54 10024210-55130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $4.73 NEEDED 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $4.81 1262170024 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $11.93 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $11.93 NEEDED 1262430017 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $126.54 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $126.54 NEEDED 1262290024 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $137.28 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $3.32 NEEDED 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $5.90 82024414-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $4.12 84024421-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $123.94 1262160061 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $195.38 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $195.38 NEEDED liul�e�ri� ���� °Dew d',,'I � �°��a ���,m � � ,�Idu „1,1 �Ilr �'ra„d1 : 1Bu,IL IN w IIIces I mi�i �� OPPERMAN&SON INC 1262230054 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $3 96.93 �IIII 1052121 0-5613'i 0 EXTE R�Ni; n�Vllhuu�� SERVICES $396.93 NEEDED 1262220017 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $26.83 77725200-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $26.83 NEEDED 1262310032 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $46.82 77725200-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $46.82 NEEDED 1262280011 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $4.60 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $4.60 NEEDED 1262140048 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $514.13 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $514.13 NEEDED 1262140014 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $4.60 82024412-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $4.60 NEEDED 1262280010 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $9.19 82024414-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $9.19 NEEDED 1262390083 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $21.80 84024421-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $21.80 NEEDED 1262290019 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $50.78 20324100-58510 REIMBRSABLE JOBS $50.78 NEEDED 1262220042 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $103.80 20324100-58510 REIMBRSABLE JOBS $103.80 NEEDED Vendor Total: $2,250.34 OREILLY AUTO PARTS 1602727 08/16 AUTO PARTS $1283.62 10022100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $82.23 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $873.03 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $268.59 82024414-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $59.77 Vendor Total: $1,283.62 PETERSON CAT PC001535955 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $115.32 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $115.32 NEE PC060133432 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $120.25 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $120.25 NEE PC060133431 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $93.65 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $93.65 NEE Iliorim l',1,,T ices 6o ��� NIii_ I1l1 11,, fb,m0�nnnnn„�1,11'q4,„opu,,,��1„11ur ��0 ��I� �o lliul ,,,,,uu „,„0„1,1„,11,14,0,011„,a �� pmv„lH,Ji,„,„„,„„, tlll� � � hl � ,wi �,���uugui,1ilii,"n1,Plmi,,,,L,,,,�IIIV, 1,0431u PETERSON CAT PC060124332 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $246.07 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $246.07 NEE Vendor Total: $575.29 PHILLIPS SEABROOK 6568 STRUCT ENGNG/PLAN $750.00 10521210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $750.00 ASSOCIATES CHCK/SUBSTIT Vendor Total: $750.00 QUILL CORPORATION 27995 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $192.98 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $192.98 NEEDE Vendor Total: $192.98 RAU&ASSOCIATES INC 201600147 PHASE 2 ENG FOR RAILROAD $5,963.99 25124210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $5,963.99 CENTE Vendor Total: $5,963.99 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT 8230 INTERIM FINANCE DIR JIM $325.35 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $325.35 SERVICES AUTHORITY MCADLE Vendor Total: $325.35 REMY MOOSE MANLEY LLP 103762 RETAIN TO REP CITY IN $310.00 90000000-21111 PLANNING PERMIT ESCROW $310.00 LAWSUIT Vendor Total: $310.00 REXEL INC J990045 MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AS $109.44 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $109.44 NE REPAIR J961749 MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AS $295.97 20822500-54102 SMALL TOOLS $295.97 NE K025242 SPORTING GOODS,ATHLETIC $1440.02 10022822-54100 SUPPLIES $1,440.02 EQUIP Vendor Total: $1,845.43 RICHARD ANDERSON 2016-0901-1 AGREEMENT FOR PROF.SVC'S $2,000.00 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,000.00 FOR W Vendor Total: $2,000.00 RIVER OAK CLASSIC DV.090216 2016 SUNDAYS IN THE PARK $21.00 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $21.00 ................ Iii f mgNl Oli '� uul'Ea'Ntp l V iKK YDsMey.�iwYj'�r:in, �' �;ryw'V 'd(� miu pri L,I I II 111111 I�I I� ���������� 1101,1,1,0111111111111111111111111141- 1 ����1�q 10 iN�;��4'""(�f ��1;� ufl'Ilfl lull lIn IIID.oiti�� Ill1111 l'61111,,,10,1'110040000111;1„„d I�I�II�IIN lllll�lllll ll �l ll�l �111111 1111 �llll�ll ll �� � RIVER OAK CLASSIC DV 090216 SUMMER MOVIE MADNESS 2016 $30.00 90000000-23235 MOVIES IN THE PLAZA $30.00 Vendor Total: $51.00 ROBERT HILDEBRAND DV 090216 SEWER LATERAL $2,000.00 84424422-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,000.00 REIMBURSEMENT Vendor Total: $2,000.00 SWINE COUNTRY BBQ& 418 SUNDAYS IN THE PARK 2016 $86.50 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $86.50 GOURMET GRILL Vendor Total: $86.50 SANTA ROSA UNIFORM& 111567 SECOND CHANCE BODY $543.75 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $543.75 CAREER APPAREL INC ARMOR—DEPOSIT 193007 SECOND CHANCE ARMOR $935.25 10521210-54100 SUPPLIES $935.25 Vendor Total: $1,479.00 SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT DV 082916 SYMPOSIUM 2017: $1,400.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $1,400.00 UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ACCOUNTABILITY&USE OF FORCE Vendor Total: $1,400.00 SHAPE PRODUCTS 4006098 SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $826.82 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $826.82 Vendor Total: $826.82 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 5620013055 PUBLIC WORKS AND RELATED $2,995.74 10024214-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,995.74 MOBILITY DIV 57419 SERV! Vendor Total: $2,995.74 SIERRA CHEMICAL SLC10012261 DEPOSIT RETURN ($1,000.00) 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT ($1,000.00) CHEMICAL SLS10012261 DEPOSIT RETURN ($1,000.00) 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT ($1,000.00) CHEMICAL SLS10038293 LIQ SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE $3,015.29 84024425-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $3,015.29 CHEMICAL Vendor Total: $1,015.29 Lisp 1 ,1f Pr00„,senibi000001 for @iiia if 1,1n ; 1 201, In 11,oice070 K�Wi�lk' y n �� iI p ipl!Ilr,p-B'��II�IIIIO I�LMN,q- I �1�+�rrn�/ 'I�Yi+xY'� (��IIII�II��`I IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIhIIIII IIII IIIIIIII�''� 0�iI 1IIIIIVpIII�IIII IIIII IIIII6�0l0i0Id ) 1,,'Q o, SKILLPATH/NST SEMINARS 11285729 REGISTRATION $199.00 10013400-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $199.00 Vendor Total: $199.00 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 28187 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $35.13 10018000-52510 ADVERTISING&PROMOTION $35.13 NEEDE 694037 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $14.30 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $14.30 NEEDE 68629 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $67.02 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $67.02 NEEDE 36130 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $38,91 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $38.91 NEEDE 35049 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $162.06 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $162.06 NEEDE 35305 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $24,86 10022810-54100 SUPPLIES $24.86 NEEDE 41618 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $41.60 10022810-54100 SUPPLIES $41.60 NEEDE 37330 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $18.37 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $18.37 NEEDE 27190 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $40.00 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $40.00 NEEDE 37293 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $35.67 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $35.67 NEEDE 67399 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $23.55 20324100-54100 SUPPLIES $23.55 NEEDE 37061 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $29 50 89122700-54100 SUPPLIES $29.50 NEEDE 35542 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $64.62 70024500-54100 SUPPLIES $64.62 NEEDE 66540 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $64.84 70024500-54100 SUPPLIES $64.84 NEEDE 36241 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $13.29 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $13.29 NEEDE 37153 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $19.45 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $19.45 NEEDE I:1,1,h;t "u 10 ` ,' Ii new lIL ",,roll� ul. 11 6�;,.�11 .11R,4" �II nor ri,1„,�u��,01 1'�h �� IIS ti, 2I i , , � I > o N � YwI I r'n sI ism s ” hhhhhhllllhh v�Iyp�U„Ingry tai tlgllU',pgppp�1, pll h�M uo �puu Mh iiV V v�,�,� y{��mo,Vu WIiN 1„ o Nlry Pl'tl i�„�Illllpu m olu� N� i�lll l�l'll�lllla�llll ilillll�lliul�IIIIIIIIIIII�I�I�I���ilil� �� II����a��a1���� #01, ii�li��ml h� �i�CgE4)11v:�WliOppI�i il�uru iW U�Il e��ju�.v.�:l �� ��� STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 68460 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $65.93 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $65,93 NEEDE 39153 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $78.51 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $78.51 NEEDE 33981 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MC AS $351.40 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $351.40 NEEDE 38290 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $68.06 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $68.06 NEEDE 37977 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $112,13 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $112.13 NEEDE Vendor Total: $1,369.20 SURVALENT TECHNOLOGY D29830 DATA PROCESSING,COMPUTER, $6,405.00 80026130-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $6,405.00 CORP PRO Vendor Total: $6,405.00 TRACEY PORTER TA 09/23/16 TRAVEL ADVANCE $61.56 20620231-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $61.56 Vendor Total: $61.56 TROEMNER LLC 00807650 SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $98.90 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $98.90 Vendor Total: $98.90 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORP CI190259 CABLE WRAPS,GUTTER $548.00 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $548.00 BROOMS&M Vendor Total: $548.00 UNITED SITE SERVICES 114-4349156 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL $423.70 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $423.70 Vendor Total: $423.70 USA BLUEBOOK 044554 PARTS AS NEEDED $332.32 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 $33232 REPAIR 039511 PARTS AS NEEDED $396.22 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $396.22 Vendor Total: $728.54 VIEVU 19078 SUPPLIES-SPRING CLIPS $83.50 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.08) List F CheclIcs P uii a .1,111 1111' td, onpd ro a III 1.01111 inv.,ices IIII VIII IalYll ry +IIVI, iI . , IU, 11/%/%aIIIIqIVuIIIq�IIf�III I�LfUI1I1I V-III 1Itl1l IIII 1'191U1�1I1kp1,1Y0�1�VyµII�I aIII V,III,�VI„II rIIpI�01�.IIq�IpIl�VIIIIII 101� , lIiI 4UdII�IuI rlVVPpIII�11 IniN10`1 II�22,/1101011,p�V iIoI VIEVU 19078 SUPPLIES-SPRING CLIPS 11111'11111111111 1I1 I1I1111'1111111'11111111111i1111'''' 1'1'; I�I'IIIpI,III I!M�»IIid,»i1III1YVIhIiIiIiUIuIk. 1411�f�L ��IdI" Jy �% $83.50 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.30��) 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $0.38 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $83.50 Vendor Total: $83.50 WILLOW COUNTY WATER DIST 81154-AUG16 UTILITIES $39.02 84024425-58201 WATER PURCHASES $39.02 Vendor Total: $39.02 WORKMAN GLOVE&SAFETY 35881 SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $372.49 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $372,49 Vendor Total: $372.49 WQI DV 090216 REGISTRATION FOR GRADE 4 $700,00 84024425-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $700.00 REVIEW CLASS Vendor Total: $700.00 XEROX CORP 086065191 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $676.24 20822500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $676.24 DESCRIP 085670301 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $679.54 20822500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $679.54 DESCRIP 085670296 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $729.33 20822500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $729.33 DESCRIP 086065190 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $167.01 69122700-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $167.01 DESCRIP 085670300 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $173.85 69122700-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $173.85 DESCRIP 085670299 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $338.36 73022600-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $338.36 DESCRIP 086065189 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $344.87 73022600-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $344.87 DESCRIP 085670298 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $225.62 10520210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $124.09 DESCRIP 10521210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $78.96 20620231-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $11.28 List „,!,f 1111 1,11 :^^ �o113 r4,�1� 11 ill 1111,1I0 00„111.0,1 ,n0��? y 'f,,,"i I7.11dmmVN��I��dV � �1���� XEROX CORP 085670298 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $225.62 64020213-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $11.29 DESCRIP 086065188 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $246.81 10520210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $135.75 DESCRIP 10521210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $86.38 20620231-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $12.34 64020213-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $12.34 085670297 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $443.33 10520210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $243.83 DESCRIP 10521210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $155.17 20620231-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $22.17 64020213-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $22.16 086065187 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $458.28 10520210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $252.05 DESCRIP 10521210-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $160.40 20620231-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $22.91 64020213-94500 LEASE PAYMENTS $22.92 Vendor Total: $4483.24 INVOICE TOTAL: $817,016.98 List rlif Checks u1;u re..eme forVl pug rt)1 The foHowling Hst of biDs payablle was reviewed and appr ved for payment. /C Signature In 11111;:; '°s ACCOUNTEMPS 46539081 TEMPORARY SERVICES- $1,080.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $270.00 PURCHASIN 20413500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $810.00 Vendor Total: $1,080.00 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS INV222010 PARTS&SUPPLIES $247.28 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.28) 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $0.28 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $247.28 Vendor Total: $247.28 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 0000016130 ELECTRIC INVENTORY $217.66 80000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $217.66 Vendor Total: $217.66 AL SMATSKY 28 DESIGN,ENGINEERNG& $5,214.71 80026400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $5,214.71 CONSULTAN Vendor Total: $5,214.71 ALONZO FRIAS TA 9/16- TRAVEL ADVANCE $168.58 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $168.58 9/17/16 Vendor Total: $168.58 ALPHA ANALYTICAL 6081061- WATER AND WASTEWATER $3,147.95 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,147.95 LABORATORIES INC UKIAHLF TREATING 6081322-UKIAH MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $22.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $22.00 WORK 6082017-UKIAH MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $375.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $375.00 WORK �l 1St Checks Presented for X Iliprovvalon ::„.111/15/ Inv. mIo� M�4 r"i�lt ! !!I Ri ifti illiIIffflfffffffIf' fftRIIIPMPIP PPnmfI�I �1'hAt9 (((O(llllllllllllllllll 9I #7,A55e,Illl„tdl�f III Ault �r1) PfitllllllllllllllllllllllllllI ALPHA ANALYTICAL 6081309- MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $188.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $188.00 LABORATORIES INC UKIAHSTP WORK 6082516- MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $189.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $189.00 UKIAHSTP WORK 6082235- MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $377.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $377.00 UKIAHSTP WORK 6081132-UKIAH MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $54.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $54.00 WORK 6081070-UKIAH MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $60.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $60.00 WORK 6071181-UKIAH MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $65.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $65.00 WORK 6082333-UKIAH WATER AND WASTEWATER $2,575.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $2,575.00 TREATING 6083289- MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $680.00 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $680.00 UKIAHSTP WORK Vendor Total: $7,732.95 ALSCO-AMERICAN LINEN LSR0925659 LINEN&LAUNDRY SERVICES $204.74 20324100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $204.74 DIVISION LSR0928676 LINEN&LAUNDRY SERVICES $204.74 20324100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $204.74 Vendor Total: $409.48 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 702857180 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $93.75 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $93.75 702878027 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $93.75 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $93.75 702857179 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $73.75 73022600-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $73.75 702878026 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $73.75 73022600-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $73.75 702864654 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $60.52 31122870-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $60.52 REPAIR 702885288 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $60.52 31122870-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $60.52 REPAIR 702866535 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $290.80 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $290.80 List . .f Checks 113re..en f 11 , 11r, , I2111.11 is gostil ii,>1,9A5.„„ton�iot ,,,00•11140,N etai mmo *N11111111111111111111111 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 702887211 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $290.80 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $290.80 702854156 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $61.07 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $61.07 702864670 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $61.07 77725200.54100 SUPPLIES $61.07 702874973 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $61.07 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $61.07 702885304 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $93.47 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $93.47 Vendor Total: $1,314.32 B&B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 181351 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $67.78 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $67.78 NEE 180634 ASSIST EUD WITH REGULATORY $32.59 82024411-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $32.59 &M 181292 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $4.14 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $4.14 NEE REPAIR 181056 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $36.85 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $36.85 NEE REPAIR 181149 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $36,.85 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $36.85 NEE REPAIR 181306 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $49.52 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $49.52 NEE REPAIR 181134 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $68.12 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $68.12 NEE 181193 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $150.29 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $150.29 NEE 181205 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $112.31 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $112.31 NEE 180790 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $13.17 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $13.17 NEE 181146 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $75.05 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $75.05 NEE 205684 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS AS $159.38 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $159.38 NEE Vendor Total: $806.05 Pres- fr'l pp ,iiia 77,r */ l 1 List f Art In s 1 ,, oome Illl0%l..�l�..11 pboxt tIIIIIIIIOOIIl� ,0 1 llllllll l�� lllllllllllllllllllll 9#0Ill' X 111` ll ) ,' 00�111111111111111111111111J CA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC 6090 ANNUAL PREMIUM RENEWAL $270.00 10520210-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $270.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $270.00 CA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL 171034 REGISTRATION $150.00 10013400-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $150.00 FINANCE OFFICERS Vendor Total: $150.00 CA STATE UNIVERSITY 719711 OPERATION&MAINTENANCE $117.35 82024414-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $117.35 SACRAMENTO MANUAL Vendor Total: $117.35 CA UTILITIES EMERGENCY 1617080 ANNUAL CUEA MEMBERSHIP $500.00 80026400-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $500.00 ASSOC DUES SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $500.00 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA 4020036920 LEASE AND USAGE ($1,307.76) 10012200-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& ($673.06) INC REPAIR 10012200-54100 SUPPLIES ($634.70) 4020094770 LEASE AND USAGE $1,100.27 10012200-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $673.06 REPAIR 10012200-54100 SUPPLIES $427.21 4020036873 LEASE AND USAGE $1,114.54 10012200-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $673.06 REPAIR 10012200-54100 SUPPLIES $441.48 Vendor Total: $907.05 CANTEEN SERVICE 5975:000184 WATER FILTRATION SERVICE $45.00 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $22.50 POLIC 20620231-54100 SUPPLIES $22.50 Vendor Total: $45.00 CHEVRON AND TEXACO 48390711 FUEL AS NEEDED $378.12 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $378.12 BUSINESS CARD SVCS ii1ChecksIIIc ,I,m ifor p hi„,iiirov iii I�+ '�� I�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>�>1>�>�>�>1>�>�>1>�l>�i"„ ' '�>✓������11><' ' > � '','�llllllllllllll��'° °, `�' 111111111111111111111111111 " ',a'' ' lr `�' �1��1111>1 '1111�" `6���llll`1� ��11111111111111111111111 CHEVRON AND TEXACO 48132486 FUEL AS NEEDED $652.98 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $652.98 BUSINESS CARD SVCS Vendor Total: $1,031.10 CHRISTOPHER DEWEY TA 10/03- TRAVEL ADVANCE $354.70 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $354.70 10/05/16 Vendor Total: $354.70 CLARK PEST CONTROL 18762632 PEST CONTROL SVCS $90.00 80026130-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $90.00 18744709 PEST CONTROL SVCS $74.00 80026330-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $74.00 Vendor Total: $164.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8-2016 PROJECT ADMIN FOR $9,900.00 60917458-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $9,900.00 COMMISSION OF MENDOCINO CREEKSIDE VILLAGE PROJECT Vendor Total: $9,900.00 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL 8821-497137 MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL $23.95 82024411-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $0.12 DISTRIBUTORS INC SUPPI 82024411-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $23.95 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.12) Vendor Total: $23.95 COOPER COMPLIANCE 1439 COMPLIANCE RPT SVCS TO $2,666.67 80026400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,666.67 CORPORATION MEET FE Vendor Total: $2,666.67 COUNTY OF MENDOCINO DV090916 CEQA RIVERSIDE PARK $50.00 25024210-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $50.00 COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER Vendor Total: $50.00 DANIEL STEEL&MACHINE INC 090616-C BOOMTRUCK AND OPERATOR $460.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $460.00 Vendor Total: $460.00 rIL° it ICh. "ks Prim firAdm1111 �fJJ� I11" 15 «r41116 In...Asea verndc)t 410, lll,EYM ill 'M !%%%%%%%%%%%% 9j, l ni o �������������% DAVID RAPPORT 6467 LEGAL SERVICES FOR FY 16/17 $25,361,95 10014000-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $229.22 84424422-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $6,632.56 10014000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $1,348.20 10014000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $4,962.96 10514000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $7,999.98 20414000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $2,155.64 77714000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $157.74 80014000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $465.83 82014000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $224.29 90214000-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $1,015.46 94024423-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $108.45 90214000-52140 LITIGATION EXPENSES $61.62 Vendor Total: $25,361.95 DON WADDINGTON TA 9/16- TRAVEL ADVANCE $168.58 82024414-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $168.58 9/17/06 Vendor Total: $168.58 DONALD KNIGHT 019049 DECALS $146.37 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $146.37 019062 SIGN REPAIR $124.58 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $124.58 Vendor Total: $270.95 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL L0279175 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $90.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $90.00 INC ORGANIC,N L0280580 WATER TESTING:TOTAL $110.00 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $110.00 ORGANIC,N Vendor Total: $200.00 Li 11„ r° rr fo for ARar 4 X111111., lo EVERGREEN JOB&SAFETY 535 EDUCATIONAUTRAINING $927.68 20526430-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $927.68 TRAINING INC SERVICES 534 EDUCATIONAL/TRAINING $2,028.00 80026110-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,014.00 SERVICES 80026120-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,014.00 Vendor Total: $2,955.68 FARWEST LINE SPECIALTIES 216120 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND $1,332.83 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($9.53) SUPPL 80026110-54100 SUPPLIES $1,214.03 80026120-54100 SUPPLIES $1.53 80026120-54100 SUPPLIES $118.80 Vendor Total: $9,332.83 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1206448 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT, $1,414.72 82000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $1,414.72 #1423 FIXTURES, Vendor Total: $1,414.72 FITZGERALD INVESTIGATIONS DV090616 LEGAL SERVICES $45.00 10016100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $45.00 Vendor Total: $45.00 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS 354472 SUPPLIES $698.50 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.75) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($2.98) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($44.63) 63020210-54100 SUPPLIES $48.36 63020210-54100 SUPPLIES 5698.50 Vendor Total: $698.50 GARTON TRACTOR INC CU26017 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $608.53 84024425-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $608.53 Vendor Total: $608.53 GCR 851-33924 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $752.82 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($3.11) LABOR Li „ icks Pres. tP for1 pr,. I .1 +n „11/15/2i.,16 -ic. ,,,, l 1iiII „„,,,,„Illl„„,.L,,,„///%iisi1 /l00000a aLu' s oA.V;lllllllJJ jJiit wi........��JJ&vaj,aJJ . a 111 ,Afi1 GCR 851-33924 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $752.82 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $3.11 LABOR 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $75282 851-34343 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $97.68 10022100-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 $97.68 LABOR REPAIR 851-34277 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $780.16 10022100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $780.16 LABOR 851-33969 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $260.31 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $260.31 LABOR 851-33968 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $63.89 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $63.89 LABOR 851-34201 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $73.08 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $73.08 LABOR 851-33973 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $142.47 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $142.47 LABOR 851-34203 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $540.83 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $540.83 LABOR 851-34425 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $588.34 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $588.34 LABOR 851-34234 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $701.94 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $701.94 LABOR 851-34056 TIRES,TUBES,REPAIRS& $214.12 10520224-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $214.12 LABOR Vendor Total: $4,215.64 GCS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIP 14164 PARTS&SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $65.00 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $65.00 SRVS Vendor Total: $65.00 GRICE INDUSTRIES INC 01836 PULLING CABLE $451.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.53) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($2.10) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($31.50) 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $34.13 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $451.00 Vendor Total: $451.00 List 0f ..cks 1. -n rfc . 111 VrARIT, ,-.�1 � /n H 115/2* % I II vilom1 / lll/IO//e'!,1 ( l llln %ll0:mictiot issloysoc$86m9/OIIIIIIIIIIIIII81,1,1 ; 510 PLES luand J1$1111181)611111JJ1.151191D HI-LINE UTILITY SUPPLY 10020828 MULE/MEASURING PULL TAPE Vendor Total: $861.59 INTEGRITY SHRED 61890 DOCUMENT SHREDDING $28.50 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $28.50 Vendor Total: $28.50 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 380022121 BATTERIES $169.13 10520224-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $169.13 Vendor Total: $169.13 J&M LOCK 32911 DUPLICATE KEYS,REPAIRS& $18.17 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $18.17 MISC 32923 DUPLICATE KEYS,REPAIRS& $28.11 10012200-54100 SUPPLIES $28.11 MISC Vendor Total: $46.28 JAROD THIELE TA 9/16- TRAVEL ADVANCE $168.58 82024410-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $168.58 9/17/16 Vendor Total: $168.58 JASON CHAPMAN TA 10/3- TRAVEL ADVANCE $75.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $75.00 10/7/16 Vendor Total: $75.00 JENNIFER COURSEY 1170 DRUG ED COLUMWPRFM RPT $525.00 63020210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $525.00 CARD Vendor Total: $525.00 JOANNE WALTS DV090716 CWEA CERT TRAINING $35.00 84024425-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $35.00 Vendor Total: $35.00 JOE MAC GOGGINS 7257 MISC LOCK&KEYSERVICES AS $98.66 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $98.66 NEE 7297 MISC LOCK&KEYSERVICES AS $50.73 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $50.73 NEE 7296 MISC LOCK&KEYSERVICES AS $54.73 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $54.73 NEE List IIIA Ilf,r�ir ,,, iii �' rii r 1 royal n /9/15/2,11111 lllllll>lllllllInm90 �llllll1� i 11IDllllll0 lllllllllllllllllllllal, �4,00�l� '0,0,1111110,4111111J V.. JOE MAC COGGINS 7259 MISC LOCK&KEYSERVICES AS $90.00 84024421-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $90.00 NEE 7290 MISC LOCK&KEYSERVICES AS $12.28 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $12.28 NEE Vendor Total: $306.40 JOHN AGUILAR TA9/16- TRAVEL ADVANCE $168.58 82024414-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $168.58 9/17/16 Vendor Total: $168.58 JOSIE CASTANON TA 9/30/16 TRAVEL ADVANCE $86.28 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $86.28 Vendor Total: $86.28 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY 9100000002455 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES ($749.96) 10024220-54125 PW-TRAFFIC PAINT ($749.96) INC 34 AS RED 9100000002454 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $499.97 10024220-54125 PW-TRAFFIC PAINT $499.97 16 AS REQ 9100000024464 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $499.97 10024220-54125 PW-TRAFFIC PAINT $499.97 7 AS REQ 9100000002451 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $624.96 10024220-54125 PW TRAFFIC PAINT $624.96 50 AS REQ 9000000245209 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $19.45 10024220-54102 SMALL TOOLS $19.45 AS REQ 9100000024450 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $98.23 10024220-54102 SMALL TOOLS $98.23 5 AS REQ Vendor Total: $992.62 KENWOOD ENERGY AUGUST-2016 SOLAR PARKING CANOPY $138.75 80100000-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $138.75 Vendor Total: $138.75 KEOUGH'S LANDSCAPING INC 15849 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-ORCHARD $500.00 80026130-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $500.00 SUBST Vendor Total: $500.00 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 13998723 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $30.23 80026120180230 INFRASTRUCTURE $30.23 NEED 14003559 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $30.23 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $30.23 NEED List rf Chec s resntewAppri *n "'415/2ol 111.11 11 ices "AtvgfsNAec--..-------„leoosltssxRsogcoOeaosrsstnogesudsssssiwoiseAsttmnsp000manoAmtapioh,oe4iosmss MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 13932168 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $3293 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $32.93 NEED 13994849 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $32.93 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $32.93 NEED 13958521 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $38.48 80026130-54100 SUPPLIES $38.48 NEED 13921115 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $51.07 80026130-54100 SUPPLIES $51.07 NEED Vendor Total: $215.87 MAX BRAZILL TA 11/3- TRAVEL ADVANCE $30.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $30.00 11/04/16 Vendor Total: $30.00 MEL GRANDI AUGUST 2016 REIMBURSE MILEAGE $214.92 80026400-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $214.92 DV090916 REIMBURSE MEALS FOR $248.90 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $54.01 WORKING LUNCH 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $194.89 Vendor Total: $463.82 MENDOCINO ANIMAL HOSPITAL 143469 VETERNARY SERVICES $219.65 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $219.65 Vendor Total: $219.65 MENDOCINO COUNTY AUDITOR- AUGUST 2016 REVENUE FROM PARKING $237.50 90000000-23070 COUNTY SURCHG,PKG $57.00 CONTROLLER CITATIONS ENFORCE 90000000-23070 COUNTY SURCHG,PKG $180.50 ENFORCE Vendor Total: $237.50 MICHAEL TUFTS 2016-283(A) POLYGRAPH&INVESTIGATION $650.00 10520210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $650.00 SERVICES Vendor Total: $650.00 MJ DONOVAN ENT INC 109700 ELECTRIC UTILITY DECAL $108.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.12) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.45) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($6.75) t r, " CI°I i „IW Hwy Ir f ,j '1fliUUar ,,, '%,l n r::„:115/21'1'1 :. nin'' +;,,»> '"� i���rrrr�����rrr��rrr�,,,,�����111,������r����� 4rrr rr111.1rr r0059,99§50 ,11410SS Crrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr100, rrr 90u�,,RONNSilii01l 01::::" MJ DONOVAN ENT INC 109700 ELECTRIC UTILITY DECAL $108.00 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $7.32 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $108.00 Vendor Total: $108.00 NATIONAL METER& $1075419.001 WATER SUPPLY, $1,794.51 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $1,794.51 AUTOMATION GROUNDWATER,SEW Vendor Total: $1,794.51 NORTHERN AGGREGATES INC 12080 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $665.53 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $665.53 MATERIA Vendor Total: $665.53 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR DV90816 REC CLASS REFUND $17.00 10022800-44915 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOME $17.00 DV090816 REC CLASS REFUND $65.00 10022800-44915 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOME $65.00 55429-5 UTILITY REFUND $7.37 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $7.37 114076-3 UTILITY REFUND $196.80 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $196.80 79274-7 UTILITY REFUND $228.62 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $228.62 Vendor Total: $514.79 OREILLY AUTO PARTS 2707-254651 PARTS $36.75 10520224-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $36.75 Vendor Total: $36.75 PAYMENTUS GROUP INC US16080025 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING $1,961.00 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,961.00 SERVICE Vendor Total: $1,961.00 PETERSON CAT sw270042645 Generators,Portable and Statl $10,760.67 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $10,760.67 Vendor Total: $10,760.67 ListrPresented °r �� ,l;u !/ cif In.Yokes ' 111111111/0011111111/0II11/001/0II11/011111111111 1 //////////////f �1' �� llllllllllll l� �llllllllllllllllllllllllll,i G 41040, ,0030) 0 I00010000000I PETERSON TRUCKS INC 36056P PULLEY AND BELT FAN $352.66 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $352.66 Vendor Total: $352.66 PILON KITCHEN DV082216 CONCERT FOOD VOUCHER $140.00 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $140.00 REIMBURSEMENT Vendor Total: $140.00 POWER INDUSTRIES INC 715822 FITTINGS $55.42 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $55.42 Vendor Total: $55.42 PRECISION GENERAL DV090816 CONTRACTOR PAYMENT FOR $58,190.26 60917458-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $58,190.26 CONTRACTORS,INC. CREEKSIDE PROJECT Vendor Total: $58,190.26 RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL 5338244-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $44..41 82024411-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $44.41 SERVICES NEEDE 5340491-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $9.71 82024411-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $9.71 NEEDE REPAIR 5340846-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $14.26 10022100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $14.26 NEEDE 5342462-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $18.15 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $18.15 NEEDE 5340476-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $14.80 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $14.80 NEEDE 5336406-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $79,97 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $79.97 NEEDE 5336797-11 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $108.13 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $108.13 NEEDE 5341795-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $35.66 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $35.66 NEEDS 5341274-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $5077 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $50.77 NEEDE 5343818-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $54.05 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $54.05 NEEDE Lit . Itl ks Present- d flits *Aral ,-111111 ,,11F/24 1 rgArtio stoti;totiitSiiiii' isit' RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL 5339161-00 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $113.50 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $113.50 SERVICES NEEDE Vendor Total: $543.41 READY SET GO LLC 76417 FINANCE PROJECT ASSISTANCE $3,558.75 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $165.00 84424422-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,393.75 Vendor Total: $3,558.75 REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL DV090616 LEGAL COUNSULTING $600.00 10016100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $600.00 INSURANCE FUND SEPT 16 MEDICAL,DENTAL&VISION $214,433.60 20700000-20524 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH $455.00 INSURANCE PREMIUMS INS.PREM 20700000-20524 NINS.ON-PREMEMPLOYEE HEALTH $2,296.00 20700000-20524 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH $10,706.00 20700000-20520 P/R DEDUCT.-MEDICAL INS $184,495.00 20700000-20510 REMIF DENTAL $13,788.00 20700000-20511 REMIFVISION $2,693.60 DV090616.1 SAFETY CONSULTANT FEES $1,459.00 20212400-52532 SAFETY&TRAINING SUPPORT $1,459.00 Vendor Total: $216,492.60 REOA LTD 1104 OFFICIATING OF ADULT $2,069.00 10022822-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,069.00 SOFTBALL Vendor Total: $2,069.00 RING PACIFIC CL15427 FUEL AS NEEDED $830.28 82024414-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $448.36 84024421-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $381.92 Vendor Total: $830.28 ListCheckc Pr.-, � IIS I P r . ;Ildi 1.r Ill / 4 . .. nfl 11, uo a . 1. (1111 isf ,„,..t�.....i �„11„111„,. �„l 1111''������� »>> ' 1��������������/ �"�1� ,I,»>> JJ � � llb111111; RR DONNELLEY CO 906122253 FORMS,CONTINUOUS: $952.53 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $952.53 COMPUTER PA Vendor Total: $952.53 SACRAMENTO REGIONAL PUBLIC DV090616 TRAINING $121.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $121.00 SAFETY TRAINING CENTER Vendor Total: $121.00 SERVERON CORP 505870 CALIBRATION GAS CYLINDER $389.25 80026130-54100 SUPPLIES $389.25 Vendor Total: $389.25 SHARON WEDEGAERTNER DV082216 INSTRUCTOR $1,481.20 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,481.20 Vendor Total: $1,481.20 SOLID WASTES SYSTEMS INC 320663 MISCELLANEOUS DUMP FEES $15.28 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $15.28 Vendor Total: $15.28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DV090216 BIANNUAL RENEWAL OF DPR $60.00 10022100-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $60.00 CERTIFICATE SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $60.00 THANKSGIVING COFFEE 0376969 MISC COFFEE SUPPLIES AS $50.75 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $50.75 COMPANY NEEDED 0376618 MISC COFFEE SUPPLIES AS $96.50 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $96.50 NEEDED Vendor Total: $147.25 THURSTON AUTO PLAZA 193432 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $34.93 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.17) NEE 10520224-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $0.17 10520224-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $34.93 Vendor Total: $34.93 TRACTOR SUPPLY CREDIT PLAN 304872 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $10.80 10024220-54102 SMALL TOOLS $10.80 NEED ks ..,'ro'li." 11 for APIPr7, DI ;w�° 1HI s ` ,,> >1 091011`',J1I kill y X111111111111111111111111 TRACTOR SUPPLY CREDIT PLAN 197836 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $54.05 80026130-54102 SMALL TOOLS $54.05 NEED 165645 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $32.42 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $32.42 NEED Vendor Total: $97.27 TRI-VALLEY PAINTS 1-72161 PAINT SUPPLIES $49.88 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $0.24 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $49.88 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.24) Vendor Total: $49.88 TRINIDAD ARTEAGA 353046 PARTS $131.86 20324100-54102 SMALL TOOLS $131.86 Vendor Total: $131.86 UKIAH AUTO PARTS 957541 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $54.04 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($3.10) MATERIA 82024412-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $54.04 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $3.10 952951 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $148.78 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 $148.78 MATERIA REPAIR 957379 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $11 66 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $11.66 MATERIA 954671 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $14,.25 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $14.25 MATERIA 954083 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $23.03 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $23.03 MATERIA 954903 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $32.08 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $32.08 MATERIA 955388 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $7.38 10022100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $7.38 MATERIA 954195 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $7.66 10022100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $7.66 MATERIA 952332 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $12.25 10024210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $12.25 MATERIA 955127 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $27.01 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $27.01 MATERIA 1. 11p In�..-l �,, _.. 'N410141#0101JI111I1���... ��IID( J,iJII1N�l/ I lUfJl "17,f1r ,� � lflli,l ��i I�f/ p/ [1 ,.,1,1 ,)4IIJh" Jl� fl ���1 �/l, ;/ lll...l.�, I�� `.. G���A.,����� 1 fJll�fif 1>li 4�lr'"NNI�I'I �l i( '�;, �1 U'I `f Ul "�r � i�l �L+,aml.G�l�ilJl� 'l✓,1 �1 �iJfl�� i 1i i ��( >'17 UKIAH AUTO PARTS 955239 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $160.91 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $160.91 MATERIA 957779 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $51.87 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $51.87 MATERIA 952639 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $123.23 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $123.23 MATERIA 956068 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $12.42 82024411-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $12.42 MATERIA 957228 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $28.59 84024421-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $28.59 MATERIA 956037 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $6.10 10022300-54106 SPECIALTY SUPPLIES $6.10 MATERIA 952826 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $14.24 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $14.24 MATERIA 955991 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $37.83 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $37.83 MATERIA 954959 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $69.16 20824300-54100 SUPPLIES $69.16 MATERIA 956304 AUTO&MACHINE PARTS& $38.80 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $38.80 MATERIA Vendor Total: $881.29 UKIAH OXYGEN U 134079 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $670.83 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $670.83 U 133977 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $1.66 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $1.66 Vendor Total: $672.49 UNITED SITE SERVICES 114-4323987 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL $136.29 80026330-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $136.29 Vendor Total: $136.29 UNIVAR USA INC SJ64778 SODIUM BISULFITE $2,385.26 82024411-58202 WATER TREATMENT PLANT $2,385.26 CHEMICAL Vendor Total: $2,385.26 WESCO GRAPHICS INC 42031 PRODUCTION OF RECREATION $5,188.31 10022850-54100 SUPPLIES $5,188.31 GUIDE Vendor Total: $5,188.31 1List sf Ch"cks Present !!, fir e. 111.9111 .1........1 on 9/15/% i Invokes CESI'f:hlargig„„„„„„,,,,,„„„„„„,.......JOMOjgepft—*ag‘Ji0iiiaPlikganYgoigthtijitNNNNNUIPYWggAggOttht'Petajt'I'andFAMtRaiakietlitMEHH WESTERN WATER 41761 Contract 1516202 retainage $1,125.00 82200000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $562.50 CONSTRUCTORS INC 08/26/2016 to 82200000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $562.50 Vendor Total: $1,125.00 WILLOW COUNTY WATER DIST AUG16 WATER SERVICES $20.00 31122870-55210 UTILITIES $20.00 AUG16.1 WATER SERVICES $31.72 31122870-55210 UTILITIES $31.72 Vendor Total: $51.72 VVYATT IRRIGATION CO 222216 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $83.92 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.39) NEEDE 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $0.39 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $83.92 222043 PARTS&MISC SUPPLIES AS $25.59 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $25.59 NEEDE REPAIR Vendor Total: $109.51 XEROX CORP 086065186 COPIER LEASE-SEE ADD'L $760.57 20822500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $760.57 DESCRIP Vendor Total: $760.57 YOKAYO VETERINARY CLINIC 8/31/16 VETERNARY SERVICES $634.13 10020217-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $634.13 Vendor Total: $634.13 INVOICE TOTAL: $391,036.43 ' * f !r I/ II IIIA 11,,l,f n IJrllll, i IISf,; ii IJir 11 1 i 'H;122/IIIni "The following UISt of bilis payabie payablewas reviewed and approved for payment.. - 7 5:01? Signature q illlllllim�lirylVlllppllli sJ1,fll/IIJI�// „����liI lifIll l �lll Jr k I , Jgi0IM ��lly �iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ACCOUNTEMPS 46571502 TEMPORARY SERVICES- $1,080.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $888.00 PURCHASIN 20413500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $192.00 Vendor Total: $1,080.00 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS INV222551 LED LENS AND FLANGE $247.28 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $247.28 Vendor Total: $247.28 AFLAC 680077 CANCER,LIFE,ACC INS $6,954.66 20700000-20527 SECTION 125(CANCER&LIFE) $6,954.66 Vendor Total: $6,954.66 ALHAMBRA NATIONAL WATER 5109554 DRINKING WATER SERVICES $163.33 69122700-54100 SUPPLIES $27.74 090616 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES ($9.23) 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $144.82 Vendor Total: $163.33 ALPHA ANALYTICAL 6083405-UKIAH MISCELLANEOUS LABORATORY $180.00 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $180.00 LABORATORIES INC WORK Vendor Total: $180.00 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 10622922 PARTS&MATERIALS AS NEEDED $131.44 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $131.44 Vendor Total: $131.44 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 702898532 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $93.75 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $93.75 List of Checks iii fir Appror,,friAl in 91 22/21,11,1 ,!,!,! h Invoices .1"Williiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii§,611149410100MMORMINNWitilligkilitigiitigalllitanitatitiiiAtilennn ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 702919139 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $93.75 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR $9175 702939722 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $93.75 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $93.75 702905822 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $69.61 31122870-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $69.61 702898531 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $73.75 73022600-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $73.75 702919138 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $73.75 73022600-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $73.75 702939721 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $73.75 73022600-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $73.75 702926401 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $69.61 31122870-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $69.61 REPAIR 702928339 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $334.62 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $334.62 702895495 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $65.63 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $65.63 702905838 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $65.63 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $65.63 702926416 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $65.63 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $65.63 702916079 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $84.35 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $84.35 702936631 UNIFORM SVC-AIRPORT $104.51 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $104.51 Vendor Total: $1,362.09 ARROW FENCING 75920 CLAM PS $25.95 69122700-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $25.95 Vendor Total: $25.95 AUTOTECH DESIGN&MFG INC 8133 REPAIR MACHINE SHAFT AND $115.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $115.00 MILL KEYWAY 8142 REPAIR MACHINE PLATE $200.00 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $200.00 REPAIR Vendor Total: $315.00 ist Chl c Ics Pres->! nt, 011 `lt ;.ai u 1 ,,,11 m111 a fl 9 r til 111 11010.® ,i1 mg„„„///0/„„„„„„„„„„„„„0„„„„„/„„„„„%/„„„„„O 1 N ,„„„„„„„„„%J o,pescri o1///0//IO1; > Aro ll�//I ll o // l%/ ill# 1111AtJ n1 ”`t 1111111111111111111)! BAY AREA BARRICADE SERVICE 0339878-IN GLASS BEAD SACKS $398.83 10024220-54125 PW-TRAFFIC PAINT $398.83 INC Vendor Total: $398.83 BLUEPRINTS&COPIES 52467 PAPER,DRAFTING $340.59 20413500-54100 SUPPLIES $340.59 SUPPLIES,PLAN C 52427 PAPER,DRAFTING $395.74 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $197.87 SUPPLIES,PLAN C 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $197.87 Vendor Total: $736.33 BUSINESS CARD sf-d 8700 PURCHASING CREDIT CARD, $362.68 10018000-52510 ADVERTISING&PROMOTION $362.68 MISC. 145888 CITY MGR DEPARTMENT CREDIT $278.88 10010000-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $278.88 CAR UUIBZV CITY MGR DEPARTMENT CREDIT $520.40 10010000-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $520.40 CAR 092216 CITY MGR DEPARTMENT CREDIT $669.11 10011100-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $669.11 CAR sf-d 19680 POLICE CREDIT CARD,MISC. $466.72 10520210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $4.62 PURC 10520210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $466.72 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.93) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($3.69) sf-d 15993 PURCHASING CREDIT CARD, $99.51 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.09) MISC. 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.36) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($5.35) 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $5.80 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $99.51 sf-dl 5999 PURCHASING CREDIT CARD, $100.62 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.10) MISC. I� Pr(Ii eu b lc, ,i� 411„,1„1111k)11.1110111,: (refui rl f i ' 014i-Notrf Noige. NII (( r imcm„„„„„„„„„Illi' rllrllOOO11ffiffi i " i i „ , llllpoNllll`mpo 041111 1'`')1)1 )1 BUSINESS CARD sf-d15999 PURCHASING CREDIT CARD, $100.62 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.40) MISC. 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($6.00) 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $6.50 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $100.62 SF-D 19675 POLICE CREDIT CARD,MISC. $347.50 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.44) PURC 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($1.74) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($26.07) 63020210-54100 SUPPLIES $28.25 63020210-54100 SUPPLIES $347.50 SF-D 19669 FIRE DEPARTMENT CREDIT $463.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.58) CARD,M 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($2.32) 20620231-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $37.63 REPAIR 20620231-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $463.00 REPAIR 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($34.73) 50437 HR/RISK MGMT CREDIT CARD, $74.26 10016100-54163 HR-INTERVIEW SUPPLIES $74.26 MISC 51481 HR/RISK MGMT CREDIT CARD, $88.10 10016100-54163 HR-INTERVIEW SUPPLIES $88.10 MISC SF-D03922 CITY MGR DEPARTMENT CREDIT $95.00 10012100-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $95.00 CAR SUBSCRIPTIONS 65831 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $480.69 10012100-54100 SUPPLIES $480.69 CREDIT CA SF-D 19677 POLICE CREDIT CARD,MISC. $270.30 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $270.30 PURC sf-d 19418 COMPUTER ACCESSORIES AND $1,837.92 20922900-54100 SUPPLIES $1,837.92 SUPPL 092116 PURCHASING CREDIT CARD, $795.08 80026120-54100 SUPPLIES $795.08 MISC. 11„.istf fChJ,,. °f, Pr,-ffi n !err fffi l J n 9/W' u tl In- m uu Ire; (r II I' IM >>>�>�>fili (stirMact iotumm0% v aArnt;00000%llllllTea ' ' o1 % II<<"* 1l 'll ' "ncf BUSINESS CARD sf-d 15997 PURCHASING CREDIT CARD, $75.00 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $75.00 MISC. cm-sf-d 15978 PURCHASING CREDIT CARD, ($189.60) 82024410-54100 SUPPLIES ($189.60) MISC. Vendor Total: $6,835.17 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT DV090716 INCOME WITHHOLDING ORDER $75.00 10000000-20150 AP CONTRACT RETAINAGE $75.00 Vendor Total: $75.00 CDW GOVERNMENT INC DTW9385 OFFICE MACHINES,EQUIPMENT, $2,661.49 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $2,661.49 AN Vendor Total: $2,661.49 CEDRIC CROOK TA 10/5- TRAVEL ADVANCE $829.91 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $829.91 10/8/16 Vendor Total: $829.91 CINDY SAUERS TR 9/6-9/7/16 REIBMURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $417.20 80026400-57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $417.20 Vendor Total: $417.20 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 54296 CODIFICATION SERVICES AS $836.55 10011100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $836.55 PER A Vendor Total: $836.55 COMCAST SEPT16 INTERNET SERVICE $147.24 31122870-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $147.24 SEPT 16 INTERNET SERVICE $252.31 10011100-55100 TELEPHONE $2.40 10012100-55100 TELEPHONE $9.61 10012200-55100 TELEPHONE $7.21 10013400-55100 TELEPHONE $10.81 10016100-55100 TELEPHONE $4.81 10017100-55100 TELEPHONE $2.42 10022100-55100 TELEPHONE $1.20 List Checks11� r°f..�s n Ir! ) frf r >!rll Ol„rl r%d11 J 2 14111:).,111,, u.(1v, ices r�ai lw"'/0 p,ie op pr,r'f`������������������������������I p1�1�� a,t�+i���������:jA7rgr r17 i�r�� ���1 ;( �� p�i f iOF ,� /�ii � i�itpq�r op„��,.,, ��r m �� f ���I IIII IIII III IIIII IIO 1111111 II IIII IIII II III IIII nl W0111(� �(11 IIL ffl�a it' u�i llfllG��f1 IAre 9,19Y'f 111 llPll��9,1E t' t'1t' ;A 41gR� l,10:t': COMCAST SEPT 16 INTERNET SERVICE $252.31 10022810-55100 TELEPHONE $7.21 10023100-55100 TELEPHONE $9.61 10023320-55100 TELEPHONE $2.40 10024210-55100 TELEPHONE $9.61 10024220-55100 TELEPHONE $2.40 10520210-55100 TELEPHONE $60.07 10521210-55100 TELEPHONE $26.43 20413500-55100 TELEPHONE $2.40 20513300-55100 TELEPHONE $22.83 20620231-55100 TELEPHONE $7.21 20922900-55100 TELEPHONE $9.61 64020213-55100 TELEPHONE $2.40 69122700-55100 TELEPHONE $7.21 70024500-55100 TELEPHONE $2.40 72022400-55100 TELEPHONE $1.20 73022600-55100 TELEPHONE $4.81 77725200-55100 TELEPHONE $4.81 80026400-55100 TELEPHONE $16.82 82024410-55100 TELEPHONE $7.21 82024411-55100 TELEPHONE $4.81 84024425-55100 TELEPHONE $2.40 Vendor Total: $399.55 COMPUTER OPTIONS INC 91LL41022 IT SERVICES $10,800.00 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $10,800.00 lost Checks „ t, ,f fr y°” A pp t D°,» IIU 11-11n l I In ice'° !lllYf ot$011 llllllllll00011010011'11'11'11'11'11'11'11'11'11'11'11'11'114 tOm> > llllllllllllllll> 'f( t ' „ fXlllooll(0( l/ l 1 ' `111>t���lllllll COMPUTER OPTIONS INC BILL41125 IT SERVICES $12,375.00 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $12,375.00 Vendor Total: $23,175.00 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC 28580 EMERGENCY REPAIR OF $895.12 10024214-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $895.12 TRAFFIC SIGNAL Vendor Total: $895.12 EFAX CORPORATE C/O J2 611803 EFAX SERVICES $131.80 10012200-55100 TELEPHONE $131.80 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS Vendor Total: $131.80 EFFICIENCY SERVICES GROUP 1215 ADMEN OF EUD PUBLIC BENEFITS $3,552.89 80626500-52137 PUBLIC BENEFITS PROGRAM $3,552.89 LLC P MGMT Vendor Total: $3,552.89 ERNEST WIPF 39051 DELIVERY OF VARIOUS $597.60 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $597.60 MATERIALS Vendor Total: $597.60 FARWEST LINE SPECIALTIES 216552 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $882.27 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($1.00) 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $1.00 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $882.27 Vendor Total: $882.27 FASTENAL CAUKA22843 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $32.56 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $32.56 REPAIR Vendor Total: $32.56 FILETRAIL 2016-0633 HOSTED FILE MANAGMENT $475.00 10011100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $475.00 SYSTEM Vendor Total: $475.00 FISHER WIRELESS SVCS INC 226987 COMMUNICATION EQUIP&MISC $60.00 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $60.00 REP Vendor Total: $60.00 List 3.1f e red dr AP -11.1Yo 9/22/2,1111 In vices 1 1t' Ill/Ill/%%ll/ll/0ll/%II/0%ll/ll/%%%...1 i 0000000// ;61 ptioiOOOOOOOI iT mi%%%%0000........tw 0 1 ll(� '; :Dotba�����11111111�! FRANK ROMANO UPD08312016 ANNUAL K9 TRAINING $500.00 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $500.00 Vendor Total: $500.00 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS INC 15683 AGRI PESTICIDES AND CHEMICALS: $4,107.50 84024421.52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $4,107.50 Vendor Total: $4,107.50 GRANICUS INC 80035 SOFTWARE&SERVICES $2,313.00 20922900-54320 SOFTWARE $2,313.00 AGREEMENT Vendor Total: $2,313.00 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 1041656 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $184.43 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.86) COMPANY MATERIA 84024421.54100 SUPPLIES $0.86 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $184.43 DV082516 REFUND DEPOSIT-ALEX $300.00 10022100-46350 PLAZA RENTAL $300.00 THOMAS PLAZA 1040908 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $105.19 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $105.19 MATERIA 1046272 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $212.33 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $212.33 MATERIA Vendor Total: $801.95 GREG BLANCETT TA 9/25- TRAVEL ADVANCE $564.00 84024425-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $564.00 9/28/16 Vendor Total: $564.00 HACH COMPANY 10075461 TREATMENT SUPPLIES $118.56 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $118.56 10090596 TREATMENT SUPPLIES $572.12 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $572.12 10073747 TREATMENT SUPPLIES $639.83 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $639.83 Vendor Total: $1,330.51 List 11 Yl hecks Present- :rl,r• >> ��(f ill , ru '% 24!!111!. o In �'i l. likimpondotioammovoi �����1/lllll�llllll r gg 1 11andi1g#ii in"',, 11111111111111111111111111111 HOPLAND FIRE PROTECTION 09082016 SERVICES OF FIRE CHIEF JOHN $3,500.00 10521210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,500.00 DIST BA Vendor Total: $3,500.00 IBEW,LOCAL 1245 DV091616 ELECTRIC UNION DUES $1,549.96 20700000-20509 P/R DEDUCT.-UNION DUES $1,549.96 Vendor Total: $1,549.96 INTEGRITY SHRED 62009 DOCUMENT SHREDDING $57.00 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $28.50 20620231-54100 SUPPLIES $28.50 Vendor Total: $57.00 INTERCOUNTY MECHANICAL& 5498 REPAIR SAMPLER $495.74 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $495.74 ELECTRICAL INC Vendor Total: $495.74 JAROD THIELE DV091516 REIMBURSE RECORDING FEE $61.00 82024410-59101 FEES $61.00 Vendor Total: $61.00 JOANNA MONTES TR 8/30- REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $305.26 10013400-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $305.26 8/31/16 Vendor Total: $305.26 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY 9100000024513 MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES $224.97 69122700-54100 SUPPLIES $224.97 INC 3 AS REQ Vendor Total: $224.97 KEN FOWLER 97485 MISC AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AS $496.79 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $496.79 NEEDE 97359 MISC AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AS ($48.66) 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES ($48.66) NEEDE 97368 MISC AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AS $66.67 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $66.67 NEEDE 97351 MISC AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AS $513.89 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $513.89 NEEDE Vendor Total: $1,028.69 Lis Ills l@ f III; F .1x111 iii ,,;l. 'll iiir lllJ;p In /22/2m1 1 , ices ootiilica ( imon5oii otos lllllllllllli lnt> ilitsil J>JJJJJJJIIJJJIIJJJJi 0 ° 1iscmmtiporofmooll� ogmioV 11111111111�m11111 KIMBALL MIDWEST 5125872 STOCK WIRE AND DRAWER $730.49 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $730.49 RACK Vendor Total: $730.49 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA 1410964- LEXIS NEXIS LE PLUS $109.90 10520210-54202 MAJOR CRIME INVETIGATIONS $109.90 MANAGEMENT INC 20160831 SEARCHING Vendor Total: $109.90 LINDLEY ROBERTSON IWD002 LABOR COMPLIANCE $3,000.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $3,000.00 OVERSIGHT WEL Vendor Total: $3,000.00 LN CURTIS&SONS INV50460 FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT $14,061.75 22021210-80100 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT $14,061.75 AND Vendor Total: $14,061.75 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 13940532 OXYGEN&MISCELLANEOUS AS $135.08 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.63) NEED 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $0.63 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $135.08 Vendor Total: $135.08 MAUREEN MULHEREN TR 8/19- REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $205.00 10010000-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $205.00 8/20/16 Vendor Total: $205.00 MEL GRAND] TR 8/24- REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $867.36 80026400-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $867.36 8/25/16 Vendor Total: $867.36 MENDOCINO COUNTY AIR PERMIT#5066 ANNUAL PERMIT RENEWAL FEES $2,344.42 10022100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $332.89 QUALITY MANAGEMENT FY16-17 77725200-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $666.66 84024421-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $707.53 20824300-54100 SUPPLIES $637.34 IIL,..„iiia � III Q,� III Ill iiir,,, ,,,viii ,,, or I L iiir.». I 46 1 ,.1 ,„ 11 G @'� mxll0lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllltlllllll skgmolllllllllll og J l v till n0000 11111111J1111J11111111 X11 gpui t ays111A� »11111llJl111llJllJ: MENDOCINO COUNTY AIR PERMIT#5020 ANNUAL PERMIT RENEWAL FEES $428.62 20822500-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $428.62 QUALITY MANAGEMENT FY16-17 Vendor Total: $2,773.04 MITCHELL S KAY 1609 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, $29,007.67 10024220-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $29,007.67 GENERAL Vendor Total: $29,007.67 MUNISERVICES LLC IN-0000042903 SALES TAX AUDIT REPORTING $5.24 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $5.24 SERV IN-0000042902 SALES TAX AUDIT REPORTING $1,571.83 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,571.83 SERV Vendor Total: $1,577.07 NATHANIEL HAYES dv090716 INSTRUCTOR $65.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $65.00 Vendor Total: $65.00 NATIONAL DOCUMENT 0074038 Offset Printing,General,Smal $548.64 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.64) SOLUTIONS 90000000-23219 PUMPKINFEST $0.64 90000000-23219 PUMPKINFEST $548.64 0074036 Offset Printing,General,Smal $145.98 90000000-23219 PUMPKINFEST $145.98 Vendor Total: $694.62 NOR-CAL RECYCLED ROCK& 12080 MISC ROCK&ROAD PATCH $665.53 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $665.53 AGGREGATES INC MATERIA Vendor Total: $665.53 NORTHERN AGGREGATES INC 50858 MISC ROCK&SAND AS NEEDED $388.31 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $388.31 50860 MISC ROCK&SAND AS NEEDED $611.66 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $611.66 50871 MISC ROCK&SAND AS NEEDED $631.15 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $631.15 Vendor Total: $1,631.12 r al% fJ .. .„ f 9 (. %1 2� ( i.i;�il;, � '� l,� �� r- UV� ��,r>� , `��J��U� ���'''1, 1 ��)YJII `�l � Inv. k 'iso ttirrriirrrrrrrrrrrtllrrttllrrrrllttrralliirlllrrr;nynokg*,ni o�rr, oeioyaaA f111111111111001111111,ly 1,1 , ° »000poq mr nn',''ll��l OFFICE DEPOT 855977961001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $86.48 10016100-54160 HR-CITY LIABILITY& $86.48 MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACT 852027230001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $54.05 10011100-54100 SUPPLIES $54.05 MISCELLANEOUS 855184918001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $304.77 10012200-54100 SUPPLIES $304.77 MISCELLANEOUS 860215060001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $32.59 10023320-54100 SUPPLIES $32.59 MISCELLANEOUS 860216484001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $19.45 10024210-54100 SUPPLIES $19.45 MISCELLANEOUS 860214817001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $26.26 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $26.26 MISCELLANEOUS 858321616001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $36.19 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $36.19 MISCELLANEOUS 859964350001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $58.38 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $58.38 MISCELLANEOUS 861182827001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $80.57 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $80.57 MISCELLANEOUS 858321533001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $116.84 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $116.84 MISCELLANEOUS 656561238001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $154.11 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $154.11 MISCELLANEOUS 855398588001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $225.40 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $225.40 MISCELLANEOUS 860215664001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $486.68 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $486.68 MISCELLANEOUS 856645109001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $472.03 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $472.03 MISCELLANEOUS 856029943001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $324.31 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $324.31 MISCELLANEOUS 856723416001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $292.48 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $292.48 MISCELLANEOUS Vendor Total: $2,770.59 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR dv091616 REFUND REC CLASS $55.00 10022800-44915 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOME $55.00 1111„mist (J (f h irks lire&AWlbnV ""a mon 9/22/21146 s ONE TIME PAY VENDOR 092216 REIMBURSE JOB COSTS $98.68 90000000-23200 REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS TRUST $14,551.10 10000000-44830 REIMBURSABLE JOBS ($1,000.00) 80000000-44830 REIMBURSABLE JOBS ($9,250.13) 80000000-44830 REIMBURSABLE JOBS ($3,579.74) 80000000-44830 REIMBURSABLE JOBS ($622.55) Vendor Total: $153.68 OPERATING ENGINEER PUBLIC& 56138 SEPT 16 HEALTH INSURANCE FOR OCT $3,256.00 20700000-20524 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH $3,256.00 MISC EMPLOYEES 2016 INS.PREM Vendor Total: $3,256.00 OPERATING ENGINEERS UNION SEPT16 PUBLIC WORKS UNION DUES $969.00 20700000-20509 P/R DEDUCT-UNION DUES $969.00 SEPT 16 MISC UNION DUES $1,219.00 20700000-20509 P/R DEDUCT-UNION DUES $1,219.00 Vendor Total: $2,188.00 OPPERMAN&SON INC 1262210061 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $77.90 10024220-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $77.90 NEEDED 1262220004 MISCELLANEOUS PARTS AS $126.56 82024414-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $126.56 NEEDED Vendor Total: $204.46 OREILLY AUTO PARTS 2707-258915 POLICE STOCK $175.45 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $175.45 2707-257409 FRONT ROTORS $656.45 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $656.45 2707-254837 RETURN PARTS ($20.46) 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES ($20.46) Vendor Total: $811.44 OREN THOMPSON 01-021204 MISC PARTY RENTALS& $232.47 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $232.47 SUPPLIES Vendor Total: $232.47 List Irr> I h ticks Nil II seni1„,111111 r Il 11 r( °' "Ait> i ms PACE SUPPLY CORPORATION 023457728-1 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $54.31 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $0.26 NEEDED 82024411-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $54.31 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.26) 023467069 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $11.21 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.06) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.06 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $11.21 REPAIR 023466617 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $14.95 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.07) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.07 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $14.95 REPAIR 023462584 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $21.00 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.10) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.10 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $21.00 REPAIR 023455843 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $22.90 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.11) NEEDED 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $0.11 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $22.90 023464679 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $25.42 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.12) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.12 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $25.42 REPAIR 023465590 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $31.53 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.15) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.15 REPAIR sf d II 111� s Present,minim moor , I � >U 11 1311 ."111 s l iY;;'ognliiiit111111111111111111111111111111111111111111> nymge0> 1D0000mmoome ' >! 1 Ill» l nitilig10%Il 14i 41 ommammT i netag1DJJJJJJJJ111111D111 PACE SUPPLY CORPORATION 023465590 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $31.53 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $31.53 NEEDED REPAIR 023447557 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $41.62 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.20) NEEDED 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $0.20 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $41.62 023475099 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $44.08 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.21) NEEDED 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $0.21 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $44.08 023457728 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $47.89 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.23) NEEDED 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $0.23 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $47.89 023468781 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $50.36 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.24) NEEDED 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $0.24 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $50.36 023455373 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $60.31 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.28) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.28 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $60.31 REPAIR 023467404 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $68.51 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.32) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.32 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $68.51 REPAIR 023462047 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $68.77 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.32) NEEDED 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $0.32 -df ks n'm, :Irr1111 fmF Ap prifi .v..111 f,ff 9/22/211101111,0 ices edrmi,IN �a"�""::::�"""�6 ice DeK/II/Iahm rk, VIIIIII00%llrl iiiiiiai tp001,1nd1 1ata IIIIIIIIIIl�I1 PACE SUPPLY CORPORATION 023462047 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $68.77 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $68.77 NEEDED 023462047-1 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $68.77 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.32) NEEDED 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $0.32 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $68.77 023463161 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $69.10 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.33) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.33 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 $69.10 REPAIR 023464718 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $83.93 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.39) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 $0.39 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $83.93 REPAIR 023456729 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $143.49 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($0.67) NEEDED 10024220-54127 PW-SIGN POSTS/SHEETING $0.67 10024220-54127 PW-SIGN POSTS/SHEETING $143.49 023451044 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $234.08 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($1.09) NEEDED 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $1.09 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $234.08 023476272 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $240.65 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($1.12) NEEDED 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $1.12 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $240.65 023457703 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $258.13 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($1.20) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 $1.20 REPAIR List f Ch-cks )f ,,, %w i� Approval ,122/21111.1 � r.,, PACE SUPPLY CORPORATION 023457703 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $258.13 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $258.13 NEEDED REPAIR 023452641 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $668.31 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($3.11) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $3.11 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $668.31 REPAIR 023447262-1 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT, $14.06 82000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $14.06 FIXTURES, 023451473 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $270.31 82000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $270.31 NEEDED 023447262 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT, $257.01 82000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $257.01 FIXTURES, 023390044-5 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT, $264.91 82000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $264.91 FIXTURES, 023412511 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $325.05 82000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $325.05 NEEDED CM023202689 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS ($9.19) 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES ($9.19) NEEDED 023437503-1 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $17.14 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $17.14 NEEDED 023437503 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $154.24 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $154.24 NEEDED Vendor Total: $3,622.85 PAUL&HING CHAN FAMILY ENT JUNE 16 RENT FOR 185 MASON STREET $1,365.00 10022100-52600 RENT $1,365.00 LP Vendor Total: $1,365.00 PETCARE VETERINARY 091116 EMERGENCY VETERINARY $281.00 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $281.00 HOSPITAL SERVICES Vendor Total: $281.00 PG&E CO SEPT16 GAS AND ELECTRIC SERVICE $2,321.88 31122870-55210 UTILITIES $2,321.88 Vendor Total: $2,321.88 List 4 f ' him ,� Pres, �U ' ' ..val 1EIU1 iii Invmemits .61111011001N0 t° II�I> l rommil(>(>(>(i.111>(>((>1111(>(>(>((>11111(>(>(>(>(1l I�ll.11..���.1 ' � 1 %%%%%%% �' 'I Ifs ' '; J/�� t�t�> .,„,„„„' '� 111> > ;111111101111111119 PLEASANT VIEW DAIRY 5020057411 PROVIDE MISC GOODS AS $45.39 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $45.39 NEEDED Vendor Total: $45.39 POWER INDUSTRIES INC 716702 GARAGE STOCK $25.17 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $25.17 716591 GARAGE STOCK ORDER $45.41 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $45.41 716617 GARAGE STOCK $214.02 20324100-56112 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESALE $214.02 Vendor Total: $284.60 PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT AUG-16 UTILITIES $115,749.55 80626500-52133 MONTHLY DISCOUNT PROGRAM $105.34 10012400-55210 UTILITIES $307.31 10022100-55210 UTILITIES $28,652.17 10022300-55210 UTILITIES $3,379.16 10024214-55210 UTILITIES $614.70 10024220-55210 UTILITIES $405.97 20620231-55210 UTILITIES $67.65 20822500-55210 UTILITIES $8,095.72 20824300-55210 UTILITIES $861.66 25024300-55210 UTILITIES $28.82 64020213-55210 UTILITIES $643.62 69122700-55210 UTILITIES $2,345.50 73022600-55210 UTILITIES $3,509.51 77725200-55210 UTILITIES $2,653.15 80026400-55210 UTILITIES $1,213.58 List c4 Illi ure, -IIII"wn'111, 1 f IIIAAprr.s 1,,;rr,1 HI „rr 11122/1!.11„,i 'r 'oir l i "fi� OllO11111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111� %llllllllllllllll om / lllllllllllllllo %000000II10llll% %gg ;1 111 "o'iuomotl 111111111111111111011111111 PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT AUG-16 UTILITIES $115,749.55 80526610-55210 UTILITIES $12,240.29 82024410-55210 UTILITIES $90.05 82024411-55210 UTILITIES $28,139.52 82024414-55210 UTILITIES $455.35 84024421-55210 UTILITIES $63.62 84024425-55210 UTILITIES $21,876.86 AUG 16 SANITATION SERVICE $106.59 31122870-55210 UTILITIES $106.59 Vendor Total: $115,856.14 R EMMETT JONES AUG 16 MANAGEMENT ADVISORY $3,600.00 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,600.00 SERVICES 2 Vendor Total: $3,600.00 RED CARPET MINI STORAGE 776 Storage Space Rental or Lease $1,140.00 63020210-54100 SUPPLIES $1,140.00 Vendor Total: $1,140.00 REDWOOD COAST FUELS 1799211 CARDLOCK FUEL PURCHASES $5,932.96 10022100-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $720.12 10024220-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $922.45 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $39.69 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $63.86 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $2,087.14 10520224-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $172.01 20324100-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $119.03 20822500-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $82.73 80026400-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $801.08 82024411-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $372.90 82024412-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $20.41 I�w��l re'Ul« V�fcks 11131%.1, ill�9' e � pp r 11111n *IL-„A. In-,11 IIID%'„ r {i'�;�lll �f� lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllif,�%Illllllllllllllll�J�f�"m1ff�1rJ �ff� f��fllllllllllllllli�f";J,,,�1 'fffffffffffffff�� ' ; ��"I` �fllflll� lf '� �lllllllllllllllllllllllllf REDWOOD COAST FUELS 1799211 CARDLOCK FUEL PURCHASES $5,932.96 82024414-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $84.23 82024414-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $156.04 84024421-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $71.75 84024421-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $132.93 84024425-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $86.59 1802001 CARDLOCK FUEL PURCHASES $6,204.63 10022100-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $742.93 10024210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $16.32 10024220-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $1,034.90 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $25.01 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $67.69 10520210-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $2,226.29 10520224-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $135.27 20324100-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $150.98 20524412-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $20.62 20822500-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $58.04 77725200-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $49.82 80026400-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $713.08 82024411-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $286.19 82024414-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $81.49 82024414-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $214.82 84024421-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $69.41 84024421-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $183.00 84024425-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $128.77 i112rst of Checks sen°l iif. ApprI I o09/22/2*16 .................... s r„,,,,p e-v %p%/////////////////Q/%%%///%//%%/p%///// %I/%/%//%Ip y� �1rr( q ! ^/%sry' qp] I�II IIII IIII II'�„ rllI IIII�I%I JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ� �I AI @ I III II� ������III IIIII I I I S II IIO III III IIIA�� ������� � ��� pigo„,1�'!�? nh �iA1111111 ha l ld111/'!f'/J�„cat i iffiDea tl1���11��1 REDWOOD COAST FUELS 1801875 CARDLOCK FUEL PURCHASES $327.88 20324100-58410 GARAGE LUBRICANTS&PARTS $327.88 1801137 CARDLOCK FUEL PURCHASES $685.51 20324100.58410 GARAGE LUBRICANTS&PARTS $685.51 Vendor Total: $13,150.98 REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL SEPT-16 EAP INSURANCE $476.00 20112400-52525 WORKER'S COMP.EXPENSE $476.00 INSURANCE FUND Vendor Total: $476.00 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB INC 00169820168 DRUG SCREENING TESTING $22.00 10520210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $22.00 Vendor Total: $22.00 REOA LTD 1105 OFFICIATING OF ADULT $2,710.00 10022822-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,710.00 SOFTBALL Vendor Total: $2,710.00 RESA POWER SOLUTIONS LLC INV249623 EQUIPMENT MAINT,REPAIR,AND $9,652.73 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $4,800.00 R 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $4,852.73 REPAIR Vendor Total: $9,652.73 RICHARD ANDERSON 2016-0918-1 AGREEMENT FOR PROF.SVC'S $2,250.00 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,250.00 FOR W Vendor Total: $2,250.00 RURAL PIG MANAGEMENT INC 000083116 FURNISH ALL LABOR,MATERIAL $2,500.00 70024500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,500.00 SE Vendor Total: $2,500.00 SBOE SALES&USE TAX AUG 16 PRE-PAID SALES AND USE TAX $1,431.00 77725200-58401 AVIATION FUEL $999.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES $6.00 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S $39.00 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY $387.00 Vendor Total: $1,431.00 List »rrClecks Pr. , Ir"V'VIt 1 r PIP1!! mval J ' 1 i �lUff fJfAl1„,„,,,,,11111,1,1,1,1,1,11,11111131114,13.,111.„g Ifrl «ll",,I1'100 r J,Illpll�Utlr% ��%/%/ �� � 111��1J �f �����11������;,�G„��J, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT USA 814107361 Back-up Systems,Battery Opera $5,680.00 20922900-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $5,680.00 INC REPAIR Vendor Total: $5,680.00 SHAPIRO,GALVIN,SHAPIRO& 22541 LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN $270.00 10016100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $270.00 MORAN PERSON Vendor Total: $270.00 SHOOTING PERFORMANCE UKIAH P.D. 16-HOUR TACTICAL HANDGUN $12,640.00 63020210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $12,640.00 TRAIN Vendor Total: $12,640.00 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/29900780 TOOLS $22.55 8402442154102 SMALL TOOLS $22.55 ARV/29827018 TOOLS $215.14 84024421.54102 SMALL TOOLS $215.14 ARV/29829045 TOOLS $918.27 84024421-54102 SMALL TOOLS $918.27 Vendor Total: $1,155.96 SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 8056 COUNTY WIDE BOMB SQUAD $10,197.00 10520210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $10,197.00 DEPT SERVICE Vendor Total: $10,197.00 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 3313156406 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $41.63 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $41.63 NEEDE 3313156408 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $64.43 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $64.43 NEEDE 3313156409 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $221.10 10013400-54100 SUPPLIES $221.10 NEEDE 3313156410 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $40.34 10022810-54100 SUPPLIES $40.34 NEEDE 3313156405 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $62.92 20513300-54100 SUPPLIES $62.92 NEEDE 3313156407 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $31.35 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $31.35 NEEDE Vendor Total: $461.77 List Illr,, lllryl, IPiurflJr,�� » / 1. I 1ic> Wry nfio 6 11;% List AF chr cksfFr ,,, e 1 IIP 9/22/24,16 Lvokes UKIAH OXYGEN UB 3335 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $338.79 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $338.79 Vendor Total: $413.80 UKIAH VALLEY ASSOCIATION IN18135 JANITORIAL SVCS-WWTP FY $640.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $640.00 FOR HABILITATION INC 16/17 IN18280 JANITORIAL SVCS-WWTP FY $640.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $640.00 16/17 IN18014 JANITORIAL SVCS-WWTP FY $800.00 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $800.00 16/17 Vendor Total: $2,080.00 USA BLUEBOOK 0519166 VALVE AND SALINE $446.48 82024411-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $308.83 REPAIR 82024411.54100 SUPPLIES $137.65 043011 HOSE,ACCESSORIES,AND $1,210.12 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $1,210.12 SUPPLIE REPAIR Vendor Total: $1,656.60 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 8046053424 SULFURIC ACID $58.63 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $58.63 8046053423 SAFETY GLASSES $102.87 84024425.54100 SUPPLIES $102.87 8046059919 EPDXY $276.18 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $276.18 Vendor Total: $437.68 WEST YOST ASSOCIATED 2030531 RRWA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR $47,367.50 91190100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $8,690.50 SERVIC 91190100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $15,052.50 91190100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $23,624.50 Vendor Total: $47,367.50 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES LLC 16080444 AMBULANCE BILLING SERVICES $3.15 10521210-52110 AMBULANCE BILLING $3.15 Vendor Total: $3.15 List .fh cks Pr 11 sr Avr `'%1", I »smin ', ll 16 Mii iiIIU o;i ra lly(Ull ����������������������������� omg iom `rept , ll�ll ""Rigoilloot 1� A ith 4etaitmanduktiOcal''; Xl X1111111111111111111111111JJ) WQI DV090916 REGISTRATION $700.00 84024425-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $700.00 Vendor Total: $700.00 ZAB ENTERPRISES INC STMT 8/31/16 PROVIDE MISCELLANOUS FOOD $652.10 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $204.90 DISH 82024410-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $69.95 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $60.00 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $317.25 Vendor Total: $652.10 INVOICE TOTAL: $415,152.25 List r Jfor Apprv on 1130/2016 The foHIo png push:of bins payablle was reviewed and approved for payment f- -/ 4 Signature s' '�fl���11111111JJ111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111� �'1r1'111111111111111111� �°�'''1�' �� 1�������� '�'�'lllllllllllllllllllllllllll�� ' � ,°�"°Ill ''�J'JJJI��JJ���l�i ''°„'�Ilr��"�l Al JANITORIAL SUPPLY AlS25043P SEWER DRAIN SUPPLIES $546.19 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.63) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($2.50) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($37.47) 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $40.60 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $546.19 Vendor Total: $546.19 ACCOUNTEMPS 46642998 TEMPORARY SERVICES- $1,080.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $810.00 PURCHASIN 20413500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $270.00 46672178 TEMPORARY SERVICES- $1,080.00 10013400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $270.00 PURCHASIN 20413500-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $810.00 Vendor Total: $2160.00 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS INV222698 MICROPHONE STOCK $136.60 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.15) 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $0.15 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $136.60 Vendor Total: $136.60 List 11° t; 1113r r°« " 1.411r imp, 1 ,,vw IIn /'i-/21 :inv.ill ices IIIflr1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111r�"'''' ""aJ"'1�1�1��'��� 'lllllllllllll � � Tlllllllllllll1111111111 ' ,If,1','1 '„lfIIOI��l'” ,,, llll il����������������������� AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE A073227800 CRITICAL CARE INSURANCE $845.07 20700000-20538 AFLAC CRITICAL ILLNSS POLICY $845.07 Vendor Total: $845.07 ALLEN JAMES DV092216 INSTRUCTOR $472.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $472.00 Vendor Total: $472.00 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES 9595 UKIAVAL- ANNUAL SLIP POLICY $2,641.44 84024420-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,641.44 INC 02 Vendor Total: $2,641.44 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 10617572 PARTS&MATERIALS AS NEEDED $246.88 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $246.88 Vendor Total: $246.88 APPERSON ENERGY MGMT dv091516 ENERGY REBATE $1,090.32 80626500-52135 ENERGY CONSERVATION $1,090.32 PROGRAM Vendor Total: $1,090.32 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 702907739 MAT&TOWEL SERVICE $334.62 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $334.62 Vendor Total: $334.62 ARTS COUNCIL OF MENDOCINO DV092616 MEMBERSHIP AND DONATION $1,000.00 10012400-57300 MEMBERSHIPS 8 $1,000.00 COUNTY SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $1,000.00 ASHLEY COCCO TR 9/12- REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $573.22 10011100.57100 CONFERENCE 8 TRAINING $573.22 9/16/16 Vendor Total: $573.22 AT&T 0602078391 LIVE SCAN $1,080.13 10520210.55100 TELEPHONE $1,080.13 Vendor Total: $1,080.13 AT&T MOBILITY 832118877X091 DATA AND VOICE $155.60 10022300-55100 TELEPHONE $49.66 42016 2062023155100 TELEPHONE $12.70 List im resm nted f*r aim16 Ifni 1 ' 11 �1111�111111�11��111�1 � 1°i rdbiarrrrr, m��' 1 � lllioll`, Aimp1111111111r111111mthil o > i ,toorotwirotai llllllllllllli AT&T MOBILITY 832118877X091 DATA AND VOICE $155.60 77725200-55100 TELEPHONE $29.54 42016 82024410-55100 TELEPHONE $12.70 82024411-55100 TELEPHONE $12.70 82024411-55100 TELEPHONE $12.90 84024421-55100 TELEPHONE $25.40 832056361X091 POLICE MODEMS $499.80 10520210-55100 TELEPHONE $499.80 42016 875108535X091 VOICE AND DATA $63.50 82024411-55100 TELEPHONE $25.40 42016 84024421-55100 TELEPHONE $38.10 Vendor Total: $718.90 BAY AREA BARRICADE SERVICE 0340207.1N SIGN&SHEETING SUPPLIES $450.95 10024220-54127 PW-SIGN POSTS/SHEETING $450.95 INC Vendor Total: $450.95 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 092816 POSTAGE DEPOSIT $3,164.00 20513300-54101 POSTAGE $3,164.00 Vendor Total: $3,164.00 BIS EMBROIDERY 12344 UNIFORM SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $47.47 10520214-54100 SUPPLIES $47.47 12331 UNIFORM SUPPLIES AS NEEDED $491.75 82024410-54100 SUPPLIES $491.75 Vendor Total: $539.22 BLUEPRINTS&COPIES 52407 PAPER,DRAFTING $202.41 10023320-54100 SUPPLIES $202.41 SUPPLIES,PLAN C Vendor Total: $202.41 BORIS PROKOP UKIAH-2016-04 ASSIST EUD WITH REGULATORY $5,390.00 80026400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $5,390.00 &M Vendor Total: $5,390.00 List o.t ch. l." hurt f mnt. e. f. ,,,I IIP" ,,„ „,114 rrmin r 1 I '2416 ,,° ;;s �m � mmimm.>..1>(>1 1' llllll�ll�lllllllllllllll � '' »>l� O�11f�1l �' 1'' XDll11111111D1Dl1lll BWS DISTRIBUTORS INC 216060 GAS MONITOR CALIBRATION $304.71 80026410-54100 SUPPLIES $304.71 Vendor Total: $304.71 CA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC 7390 REGISTRATION $1,440.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $1,440.00 Vendor Total: $1,440.00 CA STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSOR CCE CERTIFICATION TRAINING $912.00 82024411.57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $912.00 SACRAMENTO 5240 SPONSOR CCE CERTIFICATION TRAINING $913.00 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $913.00 5163 Vendor Total: $1,825.00 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 0150765 DESIGN PHASES I&II RECYCLED $135,691.74 84424422-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $135,691.74 WA 0151682 DESIGN PHASES I&II RECYCLED $191,571.23 84424422-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $191,571.23 WA Vendor Total: $327,262.97 CLARK PEST CONTROL 18874095 PEST CONTROL SVCS $95.00 80026400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $95.00 Vendor Total: $95.00 COMCAST SEPT-16 INTERNET SERVICE $152.31 73022600-55100 TELEPHONE $152.31 Vendor Total: $152.31 COMPUTER OPTIONS INC BILL41228 IT SERVICES $7,200.00 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $7,200.00 Vendor Total: $7,200.00 CRUSH ITALIAN STEAKHOUSE DV092216 CONCERT FOOD VOUCHER $230.00 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $230.00 Vendor Total: $230.00 CURRY'S DISCOUNT INC 609800 PAPER,FOR OFFICE AND PRINT $1,254.25 10012200-54100 SUPPLIES $1,254.25 SH Vendor Total: $1,254.25 I uu '1lecks 11Pr. ,,sent..,,, f r AIII a. t � w inv ice,,,, 1111 11t 1L rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrENI VAK01;;�>DYMI , llllllll��� ` ��111 1111111111111111111111111111, o" � l' It y � ��' �������������1 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC 26607 STOCK INVENTORY $560.00 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.70) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($2.80) 80000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $45.50 80000000-12104 INVENTORY-PURCHASES $560.00 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($42.00) Vendor Total: $560.00 DC FROST ASSOCIATES INC 10373 PARTS $938.31 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $938.31 REPAIR Vendor Total: $938.31 EPIC AVIATION LLC 6901054 JET FUEL $13,890.37 77725200-58401 AVIATION FUEL $13,890.37 6900712 AVGAS $28,049.35 77725200-58401 AVIATION FUEL $28,049.35 Vendor Total: $41,939.72 FAMILY LIFE MAGAZINE 12-13 02508071 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER $106.00 90000000-23243 FAMILY FUN IN THE SUN $106.00 Vendor Total: $106.00 FASTENAL CAUKA22954 PARTS $24.22 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $24.22 REPAIR Vendor Total: $24.22 FEDERAL EXPRESS 5-548-15458 SHIPPING CHARGES $381.94 10013400-54101 POSTAGE $18.55 10013400-54101 POSTAGE $24.16 10013400-54101 POSTAGE $30.90 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $20.06 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $33.40 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $33.40 List1, � I, � VYW °° I I ' IlJ11�r I�!'Ili 11 d� r. f,% »mi YY r»f Ili i 'l IInv*IIIc'%°",s 11111111111 �' ott iif �����������smis1 �������sYsstRo ,IliP, , llllllllllllllll,'I iivoip,imeggnigJ aiiie oet s/ glifiNi • D ,,�111111lllllllllllllllllllll FEDERAL EXPRESS 5.548-15458 SHIPPING CHARGES $381.94 10520210-54101 POSTAGE $38.09 20922900-54101 POSTAGE $33.20 77725200-54101 POSTAGE $34.50 82024411-54101 POSTAGE $91.35 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $11.45 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $12.88 Vendor Total: $381.94 FRIEDMANS HOME 35638961 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $25.09 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $25.09 IMPROVEMENT 35655660 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $35.80 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $35.80 35631352 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $60.07 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $60.07 35645636 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $92.23 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $92.23 35638106 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $101.99 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $101.99 35647813 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $139.11 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $139.11 35654239 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $156.47 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $156.47 35649057 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $205.20 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.8 REPAIR $205.20 35635594 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $218.33 20822500-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $218.33 35656112 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $10.84 77725200-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $10.84 35645586 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $93.52 77725200-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $93.52 35630282 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $93.82 77725200-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $93.82 List ,,� UUP ° me 1 Q iiii� pr sr,a QJ,�i r � w Inin, es FRIEDMANS HOME 35639191 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $8.11 82024411-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $8.11 IMPROVEMENT 35619775 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $11.09 90000000-23226 CONCERT SERIES $11.09 35633910 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $96.61 82024411-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $96.61 REPAIR 35633051 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $181.74 82024411-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $181.74 REPAIR 35647532 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $12.38 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $12.38 REPAIR 35620927 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $13.59 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $13.59 REPAIR 35636177 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $18.66 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $18.66 REPAIR 35622417 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $59.76 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $59.76 REPAIR 35647507 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $83.65 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $83.65 REPAIR 35623852 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $120.86 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $120.86 REPAIR 35655396 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $52.51 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $52.51 35639789 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $3.67 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $3.67 35639301 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $14.25 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $14.25 35638641 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $15.78 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $15.78 35639637 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $25.94 80026120-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $25.94 35619421 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $10.30 10022100-59400 OTHER EXPENSES $10.30 35631500 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $28.08 10024220-54124 PW-CONCRETE/SUPPLIES $28.08 35630790 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $172.57 10024220-54124 PW-CONCRETE/SUPPLIES $172.57 35646232 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED ($23.42) 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES ($23.42) ,,,,lot of CheIII,. Ifs Pr.,sent,,, rfor Apipu %„. dal , 9,0r"11015/ f,°, tr FRIEDMANS HOME 35645123 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $9.54 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $9.54 IMPROVEMENT 35622014 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $9.69 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $9.69 35646234 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $17.08 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $17.08 35646067 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $27.82 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $27.82 35646199 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $34.65 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $34.65 35638427 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $44.81 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $44.81 35629037 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $60.23 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $60.23 35622678 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $111.41 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $111.41 35655443 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $126.45 10024220-54120 PW-SPECIAL SUPPLIES $126.45 35653823 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $128.67 20324100-54102 SMALL TOOLS $128.67 35655663 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $109.01 80026130-54102 SMALL TOOLS $109.01 35638615 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $78.43 82024414-54102 SMALL TOOLS $78.43 35628095 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $460.43 82024414-54102 SMALL TOOLS $460.43 35648667 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $22.61 84024425-54102 SMALL TOOLS $22.61 35654366 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $27.77 84024425-54102 SMALL TOOLS $27.77 35640561 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $11.19 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $11.19 35627603 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $15.17 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $15.17 35636786 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $16.15 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $16.15 35621765 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $18.22 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $18.22 List 1 '; I; V, res.'„iu„�� I` r App , f,ii »IIIs . sir, u f +a In " ,J.I'''I'' r"ir ///////////////////////////////%///// //D/11'0 '41 emo/////////// owsoologoi % 1 fl °o o IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJi FRIEDMANS HOME 35639554 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $29.64 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $29.84 IMPROVEMENT 35652943 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $33.21 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $33.21 35652846 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $35.36 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $35.36 35639291 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $45.14 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $45.14 35640723 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $47.11 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $47.11 35620536 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $52.93 20324100-54100 SUPPLIES $52.93 35656100 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $7.22 20524412-54100 SUPPLIES $7.22 35636825 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $164.03 20822500-54100 SUPPLIES $164.03 35653309 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $17.51 20824300-54100 SUPPLIES $17.51 35623583 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $39.36 20922900-54100 SUPPLIES $39.36 35645046 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $54.05 70024500-54100 SUPPLIES $54.05 35630581 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $5.95 80026330-54100 SUPPLIES $5.95 35630817 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $9.93 80026330-54100 SUPPLIES $9.93 35653859 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $14.67 80026330-54100 SUPPLIES $14.67 35649687 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $105.69 80026330-54100 SUPPLIES $105.69 35644941 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $16.93 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $16.93 35654175 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $17.65 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $17.65 35620460 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $27.91 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $27.91 35630226 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $38.54 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $38.54 List pf Checks 26 Presented l f r A,ovprH l 1 o.1 w r '1.ivoices ii , Invoice,,Accountbetait and. ,�,�� if FRIEDMANS HOME 35652911 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $59.81 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $59.81 IMPROVEMENT 35647913 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $101.79 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $101.79 35640419 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $61.60 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $61.60 35651636 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $90.27 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $90.27 35638665 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $2.74 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $2.74 35630065 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $4.34 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $4.34 35648514 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $16.26 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $16.26 35621191 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $37.43 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $37.43 35647385 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $45.22 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $45.22 35639602 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $46.55 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $46.55 35627697 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $53.20 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $53.20 35646062 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $60.28 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $60.28 35630166 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $99.48 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $99.48 35652126 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $174.51 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $174.51 35628793 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $268.53 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $268.53 35645732 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $12.30 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $12.30 35648037 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $25.00 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $25.00 35640341 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $31.03 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $31.03 35622641 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $34.77 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $34.77 List ,,, rfor Alprovall s J1111, In-, ices yendor ktinne/%!%/ ice4// 'Invoke es // invoke Alia iiiic , t ,lAl////o/// %7iQ totatiO FRIEDMANS HOME 35639034 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $34.77 64024421-54100 SUPPLIES $34.77 IMPROVEMENT 35619262 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $51.77 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $51.77 35621905 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $74.67 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $74.87 35652997 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $134.12 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $134.12 5639265 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $253.45 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $253.45 35654581 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $399.66 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $399.66 Vendor Total: $6,404.71 GARY L BUFFO SR TRUST DV092216 SEWER LATERAL REPLACEMENT $2,000.00 84424422-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,000.00 Vendor Total: $2,000.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE FY 16117 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $190.D0 10013400-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $190.00 OFFICERS ASSOC SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $190.00 HARTFORD RETIREE PREMIUM OCT 16 RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE $2,069.49 20700000-20524 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH $2,069.49 ACCT 1NS.PREM Vendor Total: $2,069.49 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 6031437 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES AS $33.49 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $33.49 NEED Vendor Total: $33.49 HOPLAND FIRE PROTECTION 09202016 SERVICES OF FIRE CHIEF JOHN $5,925.00 10521210-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $5,925.00 DIST BA Vendor Total: $5,925.00 INFOSEND INC 110318 U8 PRINT&MAIL SERVICES $3,343.62 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,343.62 Vendor Total: $3,343.62 INTERCOUNTY MECHANICAL& DV091916 ENERGY REBATE $1,615.00 80626500-52135 ENERGY CONSERVATION $1,615.00 ELECTRICAL INC PROGRAM Vendor Total: $1,615.00 111.„1111t li 1,J' IIID IIIA,,,, III iiir111...111, ilia l ° I» I iiiw ':*11 01111,» „ „ 31 iiff i n l�n��orf fl bolo/1r1 r11rp1fU%ol «rf ?roo/nUl lirlr rly 6rr11rrrr r r,rlrli p 0//�Irrtrr�l Hlrl,r rl r,l iu l«l�,111 y llu�l f r rr I r r r ,�a IJ I Ilrrr rlr 11� 11n�rr„ ��rrn���/��1J�111ii INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION DV092216 MEMBERSHIP $290.13 10023320-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $150.00 OF SUBSCRIPTIONS 10023320-54100 SUPPLIES $140.13 Vendor Total: $290.13 JAMES O'BRIEN TR 9/12- REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $3,905.57 80026200-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $3,905.57 9/17/16 Vendor Total: $3,905.57 JENNIFER COURSEY 1160 PHOTO FOR EXHIBIT $51.09 69122700-54100 SUPPLIES $51.09 Vendor Total: $51.09 JULIE WEBB DV092016 REIMBURSE SUPPLIES $10.00 10022810-54100 SUPPLIES $10.00 Vendor Total: $10.00 KATRINA BALLARD TR 9/11- REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $776.74 10023320-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $776.74 9/14/16 Vendor Total: $776.74 KENNETH RONK TR 9/13- REIBMURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $57.23 77725200-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $57.23 9/17/16 Vendor Total: $57.23 KOMLINE-SANDERSON 42031781 Motion Components,Linear(Sha $24,590.33 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $24,590.33 REPAIR Vendor Total: $24,590.33 LACO ASSOCIATES 0037845 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION $2,450.00 80100000-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $2,450.00 AT 13 Vendor Total: $2,450.00 LEADERSHIP MENDOCINO DV092216 ANNUAL SPONSORSHIP $1,000.00 10012400-57300 MEMBERSHIPS& $1,000.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS Vendor Total: $1,000.00 lr f.,,„l IIS ,,, fid; `f” or p .vi l In -ices IN CURTIS&SONS INV52098 FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT $3.605.43 22021210-80100 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT $3,605.43 AND Vendor Total: $3,605.43 LORELEI SCOTT 3954 BANNER AND PANELS FOR $103.80 69122700-54100 SUPPLIES $103.80 EXHIBIT 3942 BANNER AND PANELS FOR $252.54 69122700-54100 SUPPLIES $252.54 EXHIBIT Vendor Total: $356.34 LOUIS MALDONADO SR 4TH QTR 4 QTR-DEFENSIVE TACTICAL $2,600.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $2,600.00 TRAIN Vendor Total: $2,600.00 MCCONNELL CHEVROLET 5103158 HANDLE PARTS $59.30 10521210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $59.30 Vendor Total: $59.30 MEL GRANDI 03669D REIMBURSE LUNCH MEETING $46.96 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $46.96 EXPENSE Vendor Total: $46.96 MENDOCINO COUNTY DV092116 FEE FOR FLOOD PLAIN $140.00 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $140.00 DEVLOPMENT PERMIT Vendor Total: $140.00 MENDOCINO COUNTY AIR DV091916.2 PERMIT RENEWAL $343.57 80026330-59101 FEES $343.57 QUALITY MANAGEMENT DV091916 PERMIT RENEWAL $757.75 82024411-59101 FEES $757.75 2805 FY 16/17 PERMIT RENEWAL $888.16 84024425-59101 FEES $888.16 Vendor Total: $1,989.48 MENTON BUILDERS INC 192 STAIN FOR POLES $406.06 69122700-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $33.00 69122700-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $406.06 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($0.51) List Check. 1112 ,11 111 firl°pp .imcv 11 1 41/211111111m� -okes k MENTON BUILDERS INC 192 STAIN FOR POLES $406.06 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($2.03) 90000000-23013 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY ($30.46) Vendor Total: $406.06 NICK KIRBY 308152 BOOT ALLOWANCE $140.55 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $70.27 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $70.28 Vendor Total: $140.55 NOR-CAL PUMP&WELL 3 SPEC 16-01 INSTALL WELL 4&9 $326,804.40 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $15,000.00 DRILLING INC 82224413-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $311,804.40 Vendor Total: $326,804.40 NORCAL ASA DV092016 ADULT SOFTBALL ASA $1,008.00 10022822-54100 SUPPLIES $1,008.00 REGISTRATION FEES Vendor Total: $1,008.00 OFFICE DEPOT 861374886001 OFFICE SUPPLIES, $141.45 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $141.45 MISCELLANEOUS Vendor Total: $141.45 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR DV092016 APPLICATION#2149 REFUND $282.29 10023300-44170 PLAN CHECK FEES $282.29 113171-3 UTILITY REFUND $8.02 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $8.02 15673-7 UTILITY REFUND $114.00 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $114.00 113914-6 UTILITY REFUND $177.31 90100000-10421 UTILITY RECEIVABLES CLEARING $177.31 Vendor Total: $581.62 ONLINE INFORMATION SRVS INC 728286 UTILITY EXCHANGE REPORTING $259.50 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $259.50 FY Checks Presente r fm m1iir .111131pirr l, , millh,„Im$ /3141112c6 Ism Fc s lllll f ' OO//I/OO//OOOO% oie ntIII' II10i tooti 111JJJD1J1J1JJJJJJJJIJJ ONLINE INFORMATION SRVS INC 734170 UTILITY EXCHANGE REPORTING $353.79 20513300-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $353.79 FY Vendor Total: $613.29 OWEN EQUIPMENT SALES 00037183 ROAD AND HIGHWAY $423,110.95 82224413-80100 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT $211,555.47 EQUIPMENT(EX 84024421-80100 MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT $211,555.48 Vendor Total: $423,110.95 PACE SUPPLY CORPORATION 023478962 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $18.02 82024411-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $0.09 NEEDED 82024411-56300 BUILDING MAINT.&REPAIR $18.02 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.09) CM023452641 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS ($224.76) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S $1.22 NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& ($224.76) REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& ($1.22) REPAIR 023496361 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $83.03 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.40) NEEDED 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $0.40 REPAIR 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $83.03 REPAIR 023487384 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $215.93 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($1.03) NEEDED 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $1.03 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $215.93 023447689 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $1,013.43 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURES ($4.81) NEEDED 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $4.81 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $1,013.43 4 h «ri, ,),»l „T PI r „ . +11119/30/2*16 1 k01 ;s PACE SUPPLY CORPORATION 023484933-1 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AS $96.39 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $96.39 NEEDED Vendor Total: $1,202.04 PG&E CO SEPT 16 GAS AND ELECTRIC SERVICES $4,755.96 10024220-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $8.11 84024425-55200 PG&E $663.91 10022100-55210 UTILITIES $12.62 10022300-55210 UTILITIES $41.64 20822500-55210 UTILITIES $101.27 69122700-55210 UTILITIES $7.84 70024500-55210 UTILITIES $449.42 73022600-55210 UTILITIES $15.11 73022600-55210 UTILITIES $43.85 77725200-55210 UTILITIES $43.19 82024411-55210 UTILITIES $3,299.85 84024421-55210 UTILITIES $69.15 Vendor Total: $4,755.96 PHILLIPS SEABROOK 6569 STRUCT ENGNG/PLAN $740.00 10023320-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $740.00 ASSOCIATES CHCK/SUBSTIT Vendor Total: $740.00 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC 516001521 DEFIBRILLATOR SERVICE ($628.08) 10521210-52111 MAINT.CONTRCTS- ($628.08) SUPPORT DEFIBRULATOR 416145853 DEFIBRILLATOR SERVICE $66.28 10521210-52111 MAINT.CONTRCTS- $66.28 SUPPORT DEFIBRULATOR 416130830 DEFIBRILLATOR SERVICE $6,105.96 10521210-52111 MAINT CONTRCTS- $6,105.96 SUPPORT DEFIBRULATOR CC416134914 DEFIBRILLATOR SERVICE ($358.04) 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES ($358.04) SUPPORT IIIA i�J r J I� III c, I mr uu rr !J r �1 �r ' »I JJJf l� l iiia ,» �, 2+16 n,rrrw Jllll 111!1,1/l ,U1111 11 I�I. '� I�I '' lJllllll!III ;N 11J J9 „' J/J Jr 1J l JJ 911"JJIJJP f 9'Jl!"J f'JJ JJl JJJ ,JJ I'1'+1 N' JJJJJ Ji 1Jl 111'j J";JJ1 "JlW Y'� =" r fid'EintnollllllllllllllllllllllllllH it llllllllllllllllll l �1 � 1, �� �,,,,,,, � 1111r111, 111'� t 1111 �I t PHYSIO-CONTROL INC REF416134914 CONTRACT CORRECTION $358.04 80026400-54100 SUPPLIES $358.04 CCC 116130857 DEFIBRILLATOR SERVICE ($2,119.25) 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES ($1,059.63) SUPPORT 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES ($1,059.62) REF116130857 CONTRACT CORRECTION $2,119.25 82024414-54100 SUPPLIES $1,059.63 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $1,059.62 Vendor Total: $5544.16 PITNEY BOWES INC 1001796646 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE& $145.97 73022600-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $145.97 SUPPLI Vendor Total: $145.97 PORTOLA SYSTEMS INC 33803 I.T.SERVICES AS NEEDED $1,583.75 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $1,583.75 33802 I.T.SERVICES AS NEEDED $2,757.50 20922900-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2,757.50 Vendor Total: $4,341.25 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 38295-SEPT PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICE $51.80 20700000-20526 PREPAID LEGAL-AFLAC $51.80 16 Vendor Total: $51.80 PRECISION GENERAL DV 090816 GRANT#13-CDBG-8940 $58,190.26 60917458-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $58,190.26 CONTRACTORS,INC. Vendor Total: $58,190.26 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING 11/9/16 CSO SYMPOSIUM $370.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $370.00 INSTITUTE Vendor Total: $370.00 REDWOOD COAST FUELS 49622 CAROLOCK FUEL PURCHASES $339.81 10024220-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $113.27 77725200-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $113.27 84024421-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $113.27 Usk Checks Pres.1 n J it 1 � r �I24,1,1„1..Jf, l!ilh/ t% Gii iv4i 1 ����tlya/ic'eD /00%,0/tt(((#�! A/n1okg�0/>, lt moq o1�>��? ///om1m' a��m mroc a/'fo�f%�a�, �fffffff REDWOOD COAST FUELS 621490 CARDLOCK FUEL PURCHASES $303.95 82024414-56210 FUEL& FLUIDS $151.97 84024421-56210 FUEL&FLUIDS $151.98 Vendor Total: $643.76 REDWOOD EMPIRE AIKIKAI DV092216 INSTRUCTOR $48.00 10022850-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $48.00 Vendor Total: $48.00 REXEL INC K211228 MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AS $13.56 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($0.07) NE 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $0.07 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $13.56 Vendor Total: $13.56 RICHARD SEANOR TR 9/20/16 REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE $71.16 10024224-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $71.16 Vendor Total: $71.16 ROY DOUGLASS 21019 COMPRESSOR MAINTENANCE $814.17 82024411-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $814.17 REPAIR Vendor Total: $814.17 SACRAMENTO REGIONAL PUBLIC DV092116 FIELD TRAINING $87.00 10520210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $87.00 SAFETY TRAINING CENTER Vendor Total: $87.00 SIRI GRADING&PAVING INC 3 Spec 15-17 GHM Landscape Impro $139,549.41 25024210-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $7,105.50 31022700-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $132,443.91 Vendor Total: $139,549.41 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/29931583 PRYBAR SET $242.18 82024414-54102 SMALL TOOLS $121.09 84024421-54102 SMALL TOOLS $121.09 Vend'orTotal: $242.18 List Pf Checks Presented Approval 130/2016 mm mmmmmmm ._.�............................................................... Invoices o oo o % ce D peon hoop iii, iAmt, p` eCe Aic int t // t'on SOLID WASTES SYSTEMS INC AUG 16 RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE FEES $21,443.66 90200000-52170 UKIAH WASTE SOLUTIONS $21,443.66 Vendor Total: $21,443.66 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 47095 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $47.53 10011100-54100 SUPPLIES $47.53 NEEDS 42657 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $18.37 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $18.37 NEEDS 47043 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $69.19 10024220-54100 SUPPLIES $69.19 NEEDE 40665 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $63.77 69122700-54100 SUPPLIES $63.77 NEEDS 47044 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $32.42 70024500-54100 SUPPLIES $32.42 NEEDE 42671 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $54.03 70024500-54100 SUPPLIES $54.03 NEEDE 70143 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $63.85 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $63.85 NEEDE 46257 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $248.67 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $248.67 NEEDE 43926 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $324.34 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $324.34 NEEDE 44522 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $18.89 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $18.89 NEEDE 49854 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $124.89 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $124.89 NEEDE 44840 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $209.45 84024421-54100 SUPPLIES $209.45 NEEDE 70968 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $34.56 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $34.56 NEEDE 73035 OFFICE SUPPLIES,MISC AS $55.78 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $55.78 NEEDE Vendor Total: $1,365.74 STATE WATER RESOURCES 97993 OLD LESLIE ST GAS PLANT $68.39 10012400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $68.39 CONTROL BOARD List 1111,f cks PrPser r'Ifm Irflivr Ap�,'�; V� o 9/30/2111,116 InvA, V nd&Name// ////MakO����ietrin/ /ate fDOM����� oDetail STATE WATER RESOURCES 98027 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD- $94.25 10012400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $94.25 CONTROL BOARD PERKINS ST Vendor Total: $162.64 STERICYCLE INC 3003535332 "SHARPS"DISPOSAL AS NEEDED $52.41 10520210-54201 PRISONER EXPENSE $52.41 Vendor Total: $52.41 TABITHA OLSEN-PETTY CASH DV092116 PUMPKINFEST-HAUNTED $250.00 73022600-54100 SUPPLIES $250.00 HOUSE Vendor Total: $250.00 TABITHA OLSON DV092316 REIMBURSE PUMPKINFEST $65.23 90000000-23219 PUMPKINFEST $65.23 SUPPLIES Vendor Total: $65.23 TASER INTERNATIONAL INC 911452084 TASER BATTERY PACKS $424.81 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $424.81 Vendor Total: $424.81 TEAM GHILOTTI INC DV092316 N.STATE SEWER MAIN PROJECT $60.00 84.424422-80230 INFRASTRUCTURE $60.00 SP Vendor Total: $60.00 UKIAH CAR CENTER LLC 121074 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $14.58 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $14.58 NEE 121073 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $15.94 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $15.94 NEE 121034 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $56.58 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $56.58 NEE 121373 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $82.72 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $82.72 NEE 121020 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $111.69 10520210-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $111.69 NEE 121196 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $24.81 20324100-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $24.81 NEE 121392 PARTS&SERVICE REPAIRS AS $113.88 80026400-56130 EXTERNAL SERVICES $113.88 NEE Vendor Total: $420.20 List h e, kis Pr ',tf lt'.'n rr�,„4 f li VD �� 111„„,-„,.11111, +stn 110,1/3"111/ X11„I1.1a Puy lsIII »/rr i rI � �I� � Ill��1+1+�� Il It rIr I�I l iiia,,i ,riiiiip /iiiiiiii�/in 1 I,, y�r ����� li Ioo�I�iii Irp� 111 111. poll�lr, .III u �>(��' �� � ��������111�1�i�� UKIAH DAILY JOURNAL 0000996706 AUGUST ADVERTISING $4,068.46 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $572.93 11 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $635.04 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $660.64 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $703.62 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $714.66 10016100-54162 HR-ADVERTISING $781.57 0000996706.1 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATIONS $411.02 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $65.28 FY 1 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $72.22 10011100-52150 LEGAL SERVICES/EXPENSES $83.33 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $177.08 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $13.11 Vendor Total: $4,479.48 UKIAH UNIFIED SCHOOL 170109 ARC SHARE OF UUSD UTILITIES $5,688.07 31122870-55210 UTILITIES $5,688.07 DISTRICT Vendor Total: $5,688.07 UKIAH WASTE SOLUTIONS INC 320559 BIOSOLID REMOVAL $3,589.92 84024425-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $3,589.92 Vendor Total: $3,589.92 US CELLULAR 0154006059 CELL PHONE CHARGES $163.72 80026400-55100 TELEPHONE $43.38 80026400-55100 TELEPHONE $45.45 82024410-55100 TELEPHONE $20.47 84024421-55100 TELEPHONE $20.47 84024425-55100 TELEPHONE $33.95 Vendor Total: $163.72 List. heck- l'I': revives f dr AprrtvalVI -ii9/341/21•114 ices ^i "'a IW, i""-° l 'a",<i/�°' r "n u . ay .,.., ,,i.�, �,' ' "'ml w''i i I ,•� .• 7»lw"" �'r i.i m' a'"m m"i%:: m, r, ,i....i f �, �;, fll�� ,,,,,�Jff�ff����l UTILITY TREE SERVICE INC 72539516 Tree and Shrub Removal Service $700.09 10022100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $700.09 Vendor Total: $700.09 VERIZON WIRELESS 9770627189 MOBILE PHONE SERVICE $1,116.37 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $60.41 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 10024210-55100 TELEPHONE $63.35 10024220-55100 TELEPHONE $25.21 10520210-55100 TELEPHONE $76.02 20922900-55100 TELEPHONE $308.56 77725200-55100 TELEPHONE $38.00 80026400-55100 TELEPHONE $152.04 82024410-55100 TELEPHONE $82.36 82024411-55100 TELEPHONE $38.01 84024420-55100 TELEPHONE $44.35 84024421-55100 TELEPHONE $114.03 9772286728 MOBILE PHONE SERVICE $1,171.50 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 10022300-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 10022840-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 10023100-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $38.01 10024210-55100 TELEPHONE $63.35 11Checks ,lesemt «f n„ imval I 1 » o ��„1� „;„1�"� l00000000000% VERIZON WIRELESS 9772286728 MOBILE PHONE SERVICE $1,171.50 10024220-55100 TELEPHONE $25.21 10520210-55100 TELEPHONE $76.02 20922900-55100 TELEPHONE $386.09 80026400-55100 TELEPHONE $152.04 82024410-55100 TELEPHONE $82.35 82024411-55100 TELEPHONE $38.01 84024420-55100 TELEPHONE $44.35 84024421-55100 TELEPHONE $114.03 Vendor Total: $2,287.87 VIEVU 17669 BODY WORN VIDEO CAMERA $986.45 90000000-23252 DISTRICT USE TAX-LIBRARIES ($1.13) 90000000-23237 DISTRICT USE TAX-MEASURE S ($4.50) 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $5.63 10520210-54100 SUPPLIES $986.45 Vendor Total: $986.45 WAGEWORKS INC 125A10485792 SEC 125 ADMIN FEES $93.20 10016100-52151 AFLAC&PERS 1NSUR ADMIN $93.20 FEES Vendor Total: $93.20 WALMART COMMUNITY 623600055777 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $33.50 10024210-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $5.36 10024220-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $7.37 20324100-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $2.68 82024411-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $3.69 82024414-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $4.02 84024421-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $4.02 84024425-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $6.36 List I, if ti k ms.lrmelte 1J �' i r 61 1 /3411/240HIL Iin 'ices �l/�I�IIII'�01'��.ii°Ilil'�rli°�����aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa��� ���m ii�,(�����, , "il4gr;it llllllllllllll��il �� jjjjjjj111111� � ;;`. � 11,'i i111 11'�l letaitt1111111111111111111N WALMART COMMUNITY 623600243715 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $16.50 10022810-54100 SUPPLIES $16.50 625000339215 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $29.97 77725200-54100 SUPPLIES $29.97 624300236299 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $34.60 82024411-54100 SUPPLIES $34.60 622900456747 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $5.80 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $5.80 625200566639 MISC ITEMS AS NEEDED $12.18 84024425-54100 SUPPLIES $12.18 Vendor Total: $132.55 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 76130209 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES,GENERAL $24.08 20822500-54100 SUPPLIES $24.08 L Vendor Total: $24.08 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC 898761 PUMPING EQUIPMENT AND $2,203.53 84024425-56120 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& $2,203.53 ACCESSOR REPAIR Vendor Total: $2,203.53 WESTERN RENEWABLE ENERGY 28663 WREGIS CERTIFICATE $2.62 80026400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $2.62 GENERATION 28322 WREGIS CERTIFICATE $7.57 80026400-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $7.57 Vendor Total: $10.19 WILLOW COUNTY WATER DIST SEPT 16 WATER SERVICE $20.00 31122870-55210 UTILITIES $20.00 SEPT16 WATER SERVICE $27.80 31122870-55210 UTILITIES $27.80 Vendor Total: $47.80 WORLD OIL ENVIRONMENTAL 1500-00088075 DISPOSAL OF MISC.PRODUCTS $55.00 20324100-52100 CONTRACTED SERVICES $55.00 SERVICES AS Vendor Total: $55.00 WYATT IRRIGATION CO 222576 00 PARTS 8 MISC SUPPLIES AS $858.98 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $858.98 NEEDE Vendor Total: $858.98 List IIIII IIr rit r 11tin 9/311"f2111 111 J mil girlI" fN �11>l>l>l>l>>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l>l111111 0§1110(>EMPAEIA fit 0611lllll ln46* lAffi JJJ111111111111111111111111111110V U 1 O 111 d1111 1 11 a lllllllllllllJ WWERN RESTAURANTS INC 02-4898 PUBLIC WORKS WORKING $45.93 82024410-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $45.93 LUNCH 02-4883 WELL 9 WEEKEND WORK $72.47 82024410-57100 CONFERENCE&TRAINING $72.47 Vendor Total: $118.40 ZERO WASTE USA 119689 DOG WASTE BAGS $533.06 10022100-54100 SUPPLIES $533.06 Vendor Total: $533.06 INVOICE TOTAL: $1,484,650.37 ► _�' ITEM NO.: 7b October 5,. 2016 MEETING DATE: City of Vkiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A UNIFORM PROCESS OF MINUTE TAKING AND MEETING RECORDATION FOR ALL CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. Summary: A proposal and resolution are being presented to Council that will allow all City Boards and Commissions to adopt uniform procedures for meeting recordation including the use of Action Minutes in conjunction with digital and website technology. Background: On April 4, 2007, the City Council made the following motion: M/S Crane/Baldwin to approve the recommended action of keeping "Action Minutes", except for land use decisions such as zoning changes, use permits, and subdivision approvals, which are being considered by the Planning Commission or Zoning Permit Administrator; and that "conditions of approval" be included in the minutes so that changes made during a meeting can be clearly shown in the minutes, with, strikeout and bold underline. Motion carried by an all AYES voice vote. However, many City Boards and Commissions have continued to use a summary style of minutes. Recent public comment regarding possible inclusion/exclusion of subject matter in the minutes, in addition to on-going concerns of staff time has prompted staff to return to Council to re-establish the style of"Action Minutes" in conjunction with a digital recording for all City boards and commissions. The Action Minute style, provides a 'Table of Contents' for the recordings, which are kept permanently. If a detailed assessment of a discussion is needed or desired, either a copy of the recording and/or a transcript of a discussion can be produced. Additionally, if a board or commission member specifically wants a statement included in the written record, then this can be attached to the Action Minutes as part of the record. Action Minutes make it possible to easily review the minute document for what actions were taken and people who contributed to the discussions without these important points being lost in extensive content. They also circumvent any possible objections of what was or wasn't included in the minutes. Continued on Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Adopt the resolution (Attachment 2) that establishes the Action Minute style of taking minutes in conjunction with a digital audio or digital audio-video recording for the official recordation of the City Council and all Cit Boards and Commissions. ALTERNATIVES: Provide alternate direction to Staff. Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Prepared by: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk and Kevin Thompson, Interim Director of Planning Coordinated with: David Rapport, City Attorney and Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Presenters: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk and Kevin Thompson, Interim Director of Planning Attachment: 1. City Attorney Concerns and Staff Responses. 2. Resolution—redline and clean 3. CCAC Guidelines for Preparing Minutes COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑ Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note Pled write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted. Approved. S-,e =n' como, City Manager Page 2 of 2 The previous Council action made an exception for zoning changes, use permits, and subdivision approvals, considered by the Planning Commission or Zoning Permit Administrator, the digital video and audio recordings have proven to be an efficient and adequate form of recordation of the discussions. The 'conditions in the minutes', referenced in the prior motion, are currently not included in the minutes, but are contained in resolutions and/or ordinances as well as a letter sent to the applicants, which are signed and returned. However, the Findings and Conditions of approval can be considered part of the actions and recorded in the action minute style. Furthermore, any corrections, amendments, and requested changes can be reflected in the motion to approve the subsequent minutes. In examining the option of Action Minutes for the Planning Commission, the City Attorney expressed some concerns, which are shown as Attachment 1 along with staff responses. These concerns have now been addressed in the resolution, which has included a hybrid version of Action Minutes for the Planning Commission. However, Staff will continue to monitor the effectiveness and make changes if it is found to be necessary. All Planning Commission recordings are provided for the public on the City's website, and each agenda item is tagged in the recording to make it easy for both officials and the public to isolate a specific discussion. The City Clerk's office is also available to assist anyone with accessing the digital recordings. Council received a presentation on this item on October 5, 2016, at which time they gave direction to Staff to modify the resolution to stipulate that the style of minutes for each Board and Commission would not change from the current practice until a digital audio recording could concurrently be placed online with the minutes. The language in respect to the digital audio and digital audio-video recordings has also been modified. Attachment 2 — redline, shows the changes to the resolution. Attachment 3, the City Clerk's Association of California Guidelines for Preparing Minutes for Governmental Agencies, has also been included to give more clarification and definition regarding the style of minutes, and what the State clerk's association is recommending as a standard practice. Discussion: Staff is pursuing the further use of technology through the Granicus program that could help streamline the way minutes are taken for all public meetings in addition to the Council and Planning Commission. In the meantime, all City boards and commissions would be provided with a digital audio recording device that would record the full content of the meetings and be immediately available to staff and public by request, with the goal to move forwarded with formatting all recordings for electronic access from the City's website. Therefore, Staff asks Council to consider adopting the resolution (Attachment 2) that establishes the Action Minute style in conjunction with digital audio or digital audio-video recordings for the official recordation of the City Council and all City boards and commissions, to go into effect concurrently when the digital audio recordings are placed on the website. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation Budget Previous Contract Amount in Source of Funds Account Number Amendment or Purchase Order 16-17 FY (Title& No.) Required No. N/A N/A N/A Yes ❑ No ® N/A ATTACHMENT 1 CITY ATTORNEY CONCERNS AND STAFF RESPONSES: • still have misgivings about using action minutes for Planning Commission hearings on use and site development permits, variances and zoning ordinance amendments o The findings and conditions can be included with the action minutes as they are part of the action of approval. • Official minutes are those that have been approved at a subsequent meeting of the Planning Commission, which provides the opportunity to correct errors or request changes. o Any corrections, amendments, or requested changes can be included with the motion to approve the minutes at subsequent hearings and with strikeout/underline on the original minutes. • Having a summary of the evidence presented and the public comments can aid the public and city councilmembers in reviewing what happened at the hearing. o The concern is that the evidence and public comments can possibly be filtered through the clerk's understanding of the item. The recording represents the most accurate account of discussion and testimony. • The alternative is to watch the entire meeting (they sometimes go for hours) and take notes o It is easy to bring up the recording for that particular item—as each agenda item is tagged in the recording so that it can be isolated, and it is not necessary to listen to the full meeting. Additionally, the recordings can be edited to a specific discussion on request, which would take a lot less time than writing the summary minutes for each meeting. • In my experience the city council often relies on the minutes to understand the PC decision. o From what I have been told, at least two councilmembers are currently reviewing the Planning Commission items by listening to the recordings instead of the minutes. However, I would be willing to work with councilmembers to show them how to use the technology in regards to the PC items. • The summary minutes provide an additional tool. The Councilmembers can still review the video recording of the meeting. o This is true, but as stated above the reliability of the minutes is in question due to the possibility of the clerk's personal interpretation reflected in the summary. • U will tell you that preparing a transcript from an audio recording is difficult and generally produces many "inaudible" and "unknown speaker" references. You see this fairly often, even in video recordings, but it is much worse from audio only recordings. o With Action Minutes, the names of all speakers are recorded in the order that they were heard, which puts a name to the voice on the recording. However, occasionally there is a speaker who does not give their name and sometimes prefers to remain anonymous. In this case summary minutes written after a meeting will run into the same difficulty. • Minutes are preserved indefinitely and under applicable case law, the minutes are the official record of what happened at the meeting. They are also searchable in Laserfische. Audio recordings are not. Even video recordings for multiple meeting can't be searched by key words. o The digital recordings are currently kept indefinitely, however the resolution can be changed to make that clear. Generally,the key searchable words are in the agenda item title (ie. property locations, names, etc...) and the names of the presenters or public comment persons. These are still searchable in Laserfiche. Once an item is pulled up, then the action minutes and audio can be quickly accessed for further information if needed. ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ADOPTING THE STYLE OF ACTION MINUTES IN CONJUNCTION WITH DIGITAL ........ :.IDII ..........VIDEO AND/OR III; .IIL......IIL.j........:III.............AUDIO.........IIIIII III : . RECORDINGS TO BE THE OFFICIAL RECORDATION USED FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AND ALL CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. WHEREAS, on April 4, 2007, the City Council approved the keeping of "Action Minutes" for the City Council and all City Commissions and Committees, with some exceptions for the Planning Commission; and CityWHEREAS, he makes digital 2.9w�. .!L.......... . video and/or ii2.ii2..IL.. „ii audio „ '2 „ recordings for all meetings of its commissions tand boa d2,; and WHEREAS, the City Council successfully using Action Minutes digital lvid - and/or 22la au io. .22reorrding fornine years, and ActionMinteshave becomethepreferred standard among many cities across the State; and WHEREAS, some City of Ukiah's Boards, Commissions, and Committees have continued to use a narrative, summary style of minutes; and ° WHEREAS, it has since been established that the digital 2..1iw�. ..ii video � 'ii,,2,ii..�2II audio 2ii. ..2.2. recordings for the Planning Commission are efficient and adequate to record the full and detailed content of all Planning Commission discussions and hearings; and WHEREAS, Action Minutes quickly show actions taken, identify individuals who participated in the discussions, are a cost efficient use of staff time, free up staff for other duties, and avoid any possible objections of what was or wasn't included in the minutes; and WHEREAS, if a Board or Commission member wishes to include a written statement with the minutes, and/or if for the Planning Commission adopts findings or conditions of approval in connection with making land use decisions or recommendations, those written statements and findings and conditions shall be included in its action minutes, including showing in "strikethrough/underline" format any changes to proposed findings or conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Ukiah establishes Action Minutes in conjunction with the 'ii2ii fall ai 2ua video and/or digital audio::::2.ii. ..2o recordings, which are to .:.:.....................:...... be kept as permanent City records, as the official recordation of the meetings of the City Council, and all City Boards, Commission, and Committees. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission's action minutes shall include within or officially attached to the minutes all Findings and Conditions of Approval, adopted in connection with making land use decisions. If any corrections, amendments, or other requested changes are made to the proposed minutes by the motion to approve them, those changes shall be shown in strikethrough/underline format together with an unmarked copy of the official minutes. II... III...., IT FURTHER'il"'III IIIII....III III III'; ...0101.... III. (IIID that the current afactllce of takllng nrillnolltes for each (Board or Uau a ussllo ii ll ll stay lln effect untlill a dll iitall ai. 2lia or 20i iitall ai.2lia vli2aa recordllng can concurrently Iia (laced onlIllne wllth the Actllon IlNillln tes for ublI1ia avaiillall ii ll ii . PASSED AND ADOPTED this.51-4-12, day of October, 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Stephen G. Scalmanini, Mayor Kristine Lawler, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ADOPTING THE STYLE OF ACTION MINUTES IN CONJUNCTION WITH DIGITAL AUDIO OR DIGITAL AUDIO-VIDEO RECORDINGS TO BE THE OFFICIAL RECORDATION USED FOR THE CITY COUNCIL AND ALL CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. WHEREAS, on April 4, 2007, the City Council approved the keeping of "Action Minutes" for the City Council and all City Commissions and Committees, with some exceptions for the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City makes digital audio or digital audio-video recordings for all meetings of its commissions and boards; and WHEREAS, the City Council has successfully been using an Action Minutes and a digital audio or digital audio-video recording for nine years, and Action Minutes have become the preferred standard among many cities across the State; and WHEREAS, some City of Ukiah's Boards, Commissions, and Committees have continued to use a narrative, summary style of minutes; and WHEREAS, it has since been established that the digital audio or digital audio-video recordings for the Planning Commission are efficient and adequate to record the full and detailed content of all Planning Commission discussions and hearings; and WHEREAS, Action Minutes quickly show actions taken, identify individuals who participated in the discussions, are a cost efficient use of staff time, free up staff for other duties, and avoid any possible objections of what was or wasn't included in the minutes; and WHEREAS, if a Board or Commission member wishes to include a written statement with the minutes, and/or if for the Planning Commission adopts findings or conditions of approval in connection with making land use decisions or recommendations, those written statements and findings and conditions shall be included in its action minutes, including showing in "strikethrough/underline" format any changes to proposed findings or conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Ukiah establishes Action Minutes in conjunction with the digital audio or digital audio-video recordings, which are to be kept as permanent City records, as the official recordation of the meetings of the City Council, and all City Boards, Commission, and Committees. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission's action minutes shall include within or officially attached to the minutes all Findings and Conditions of Approval, adopted in connection with making land use decisions. If any corrections, amendments, or other requested changes are made to the proposed minutes by the motion to approve them, those changes shall be shown in strikethrough/underline format together with an unmarked copy of the official minutes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the current practice of taking minutes for each Board or Commission will stay in effect until a digital audio or digital audio-video recording can concurrently be placed online with the Action Minutes for public availability. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of October, 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Stephen G. Scalmanini, Mayor Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Attachment#3 CITY CLERKS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING MINUTES FOR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES PURPOSE The City Clerks Association of California issues these guidelines as a tool for government agencies to transition to minutes styles that are efficient, succinct, cost-effective for staff to prepare, and more appropriately aligned with the intent of the Government Code. FINDINGS • Legislative bodies must act, and must be seen to act, within the laws of the State of California and local charters, if applicable. Being seen to act within the law is important, because the legislative body's decisions may be subject to external scrutiny by the public, auditors, or judicial inquiry. Minutes testify that the correct procedures for decision-making were followed. • Legislative body minutes shall be prepared in a manner consistent with the intent of the Government Code. Relevant Government Codes are as follows: • Government Code 40801. The city clerk shall keep an accurate record of the proceeding of the legislative body and the board of equalization in books bearing appropriate titles and devoted exclusively to such purposes, respectively. The books shall have a comprehensive general index. • Government Code 36814. The council shall cause the clerk to keep a correct record of its proceedings. At the request of a member, the city clerk shall enter the ayes and noes in the journal. • Government Code 54953(c)(2). The legislative body of a local agency shall publicly report any action taken and the vote or abstention on that action of each member present for the action. • Government Code 53232.3(d). Members of a legislative body shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency at the next regular meeting of the legislative body. • All components of minutes shall be for the primary purpose of memorializing decisions made by the legislative body. Any minute component that does not serve this primary purpose should be minimized or eliminated; this includes comments made by individual body members and members of the public. GUIDELINES • Minutes should provide a record of a) when and where a meeting took place, and who was present (including member absences, late arrivals, departures, adjournment time); b) type of meeting (Regular/Special/Adjourned Regular); c) what was considered; d) what was decided; and e) agreed upon follow-up action. Pursuant to Government Code 54953(c)(2), minutes shall report any action taken and the vote or abstention on that action of each member present for the action. • Appropriate styles are action minutes or brief summary minutes. Verbatim style minutes should not be used, because verbatim or lengthy summary minutes do not serve the intent of the Government Code, which is to record the proceedings of the legislative body. • Action minutes merely record final decisions made. 9/18/2015 • Brief summary minutes, at a minimum,record the final decisions made; and, at a maximum, may record what advice the body was given to enable it to make its decisions, the body's thought process in making the decision, and the final decisions made. Emphasis is given on the body's thought process, not individual members' thought processes. The minutes should summarize only the main points which arose in discussion if and only if they are relevant to the decision. • Comments made by members such as "for the record" or"for the minutes" have no bearing on the content of minutes and are given no greater and no lesser consideration than other comments made at the public meeting. Members seeking to memorialize comments should incorporate such verbiage into the language of the motion. As an alternative, members may submit written statements to be retained with the agenda item. • Since the main purpose of minutes is to record the legislative body's decision, summary minutes should be brief. By concentrating on the legislative body's decision, brief summary minutes will provide only a select recording of what was discussed at the meeting. Brief summary minutes should not attempt to reproduce, however summarily, what every speaker said. It should only record the essence of the discussion and include the main threads that lead to the body's conclusion. • To the fullest extent possible, brief summary minutes should be impersonal and should not attribute views to individual persons. Only the positions and decisions taken by the whole legislative body are relevant, not those of individual members. The passive voice is favored i.e. "It was suggested that...," "It was generally felt that...," "It was questioned whether...," "During discussion, it was clarified..." • There are reasons for not attributing comments to specific speakers. First, it makes for brevity--a point can be recorded more concisely in impersonal form. Second, a point raised by one speaker will often be further developed by others—in impersonal brief summary minutes, only the fully-developed point is recorded in its final form. Third, points by several speakers can be consolidated into a single paragraph. Fourth, the impersonal style averts future corrections to minutes. • While the primary purpose of minutes is to memorialize decisions made by the legislative body as a whole, under limited circumstances it is necessary and/or appropriate to attribute comments to individual members including: o Individual member's reports pursuant to Government Code 53232.3(d) (enacted by AB 1234, 2005). The minute record shall include the type of meeting attended at the expense of the local agency and the subject matter. o Individual member's reports on intergovernmental agencies. Brief summary minutes should include the type of meeting at a minimum, and, at the maximum, include the subject matter. o Individuals speaking under public comment. Brief summary minutes shall, at a minimum, list the public member's name (if provided); and, at a maximum, include the overall topic and stance/position. Such as Mr. Jones spoke in opposition to the Project X. Being mindful that the minutes are recordings of the legislative body's proceedings, it is not appropriate to include detail of individual comments. There is an exception for public testimony provided during public hearings, for which the minutes shall include the speaker's name (if provided) and a summary position of the speaker (i.e., supported or opposed). • For purposes of meeting Government Code 36814 and/or 54953(c)(2), the city clerk should enter the ayes and noes in the minutes. For informal consensus (i.e. providing staff direction), it is appropriate to note the dissention of one or more members by, at a minimum, stating the dissenting member's name and dissention, such as "Mr. Jones dissented," and at a maximum to also include a brief reason, such as "Mr. Jones dissented citing budget concerns." • While the primary purpose of legislative body meetings is for the legislative body to take legislative action and make decisions to advance agency business, it is acknowledged that agency meetings also Page 2 serve as platforms for ceremonial presentations and reports on social and community events. At a minimum, brief summary minutes should identify that presentations were made and event reports were given; and, at a maximum,report only the subject matter of the presentation or event. • For community workshops and town hall meetings subject to the Brown Act, brief summary minutes, at a maximum, record the overall topic, provided that no legislative actions were taken. It is advisable to note in the minutes that no legislative action was taken. • The guidelines contained herein are applicable to committees and commissions subject to the Brown Act. It is acknowledged that many boards and commissions take few legislative actions, and the tendency is to include more detail in the minutes on event reports and planning. At a maximum, brief summary minutes may include key points of the final reports or determinations, and all comments shall be attributable to the entire body and not attributable to individual members. • Brief summary minutes shall serve to clarify decisions taken and who is expected to execute the decisions. It is not necessary to write down all action points or all tasks identified. Minutes shall not serve as a substitute for task lists, and the focus shall remain on the final decisions made by the legislative body. • The language of brief summary minutes should be relatively restrained and neutral, however impassioned the discussion. Brief summary minutes will record the substance of the point in an intemperate way. • To the fullest extent possible, minutes should be self-contained to be intelligible without reference to other documents. • As a general rule, individual member comments are not identified in the brief summary minutes of discussions, and minutes should concentrate on the collective body's thought process and the collective decisions made by the majority, not individuals. • Brief summary minutes should concentrate on central issues germane to the final decision. The record of the discussion should be presented in a logical sequence, rather than reproduced in the actual order they were made in discussion. • The legislative body may wish to choose more, substantive (summary) minutes if there's no archival audio/video backup recording available of its proceedings. If audio/video recording is available for future reference, minute notations can be more limited (action). Page 3 Correspondence Received for Agenda Item 7b From: Pinky Kushner To: Kristine Lawler Cc: Sage Sangiacomo Subject: Item 7b,October 19,2016--please distribute to Council Members Date: Wednesday,October 19,2016 9:52:27 AM Attachments: action minutes.tiff ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Regarding Item 7b from Consent Calendar,October 19,2016 Greetings City Council Members, I think the Council proposed at the October 5,2016,meeting that Staff's changes to minute taking not go into effect until the City had begun a digital audio-visual access on line. Today's Agenda Item 7b on the Consent Calendar is in essence identical to that proposed on October 5. [See excerpt below.] 1)Surely there is no difference between "...the video and/or digital audio recordings..."and the currently modified"...the digital audio or digital audio-video..." The issue---The problem of audio alone without an accompanying video lies in trying to identify the speaker in the audio,especially during smaller coimnittee meetings. Your discussion on October 5 led one to think the changes to the minutes would not occur until meetings had an audio-video recording.Staff is not proposing this. A small but important modification to the item---include speaker identification in the minutes/guide to the digital audio. 2)The proposal states that minutes will add comments by members if requested for the record,but by implication not comments by the public,even those who so request. For example,if the TEC were to meet and discuss tow trucks,a member of the public objecting to or supporting tow trucks on residential streets could not have his/her comments be included in the record by request. This needs to change. The public should be able to"state for the record." To avoid degrading the City's current standard of open government,item 7b should be modified. Sincerely, Pinky Kushner FROM Item 7b ITEM NO.: 7c MEETING DATE: October 19, 2016 pJki AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT CitySUBJECT: APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ACCOUNT#22020200.80100 IN THE AMOUNT $8,808.16, AND APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF FORTY PORTABLE RADIOS FROM MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $68,808.16 Summary: Staff is seeking approval to purchase forty (40) APX 4000 portable radio systems from Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the amount of$68,808.16. Since February of 2000, the Ukiah Police Department has used Motorola HT 750 portable radio systems. The manufacturer has discontinued this system, the system is more than sixteen (16) years old, and is considered obsolete. In 2015, the Ukiah Police Department tested the Motorola APX 4000 portable radio system and found that this system best meets the department's needs. In the 2016-17 FY Budget, the Council authorized the replacement of these radios and $60,000 was budgeted for this purchase. The department is seeking a budget amendment to account #22020200.80100 in the amount of $8,808.16 and for approval to purchase the portable radios in the amount of$68,808.16. A transfer from the general fund to fund#220 (Equipment Reserve)will be required to complete the budget adjustment. Discussion: In February of 2000, Ukiah Police Department was awarded a California Law Enforcement Technology Equipme YPurchase (CLETEP) Grant. This grant allowed the department to purchase the Motorola HT 750 portable radio system. This grant is no longer available. The department's portable radios have been in constant use since 2000. In September of 2015, Motorola discontinued production of this model. The HT 750 portable radio system is now considered obsolete and parts are difficult to find. In 2015, the Ukiah Police Department tested several portable radio systems and found that the Motorola APX 4000 best met the department's needs. Motorola radio equipment is the most common platform within the County's allied agencies (MCSO, WPD, and FBPD) and the other county agencies have now begun transitioning to the APX 4000 portable radio system. The Ukiah Police Department utilizes the same radio technician as these other law enforcement agencies in Mendocino County, and by selecting the APX 4000 platform we will save costs and down-time in comparison to purchasing a different radio system. Continued on Pia e 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Approve a budget amendment to fund #22020200.80100 in the amount of $8,808.16 and required transfer from the general fund in the same amount, and; 2. Approve the purchase of forty (40) APX 4000 portable radio systems from Motorola Solutions, Inc in the amount of $68,808.16 from account#22020200.80100. ALTERNATIVES: Provide staff with alternate direction. Citizens advised: N/A _.._._. ..........-.-.-......-.-.-.-.-._.._....-.._..u__.... �.._. .... Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Sean Kaeser, Lieutenant Coordinated with: Mary Horger, Purchasing Manager and Dan Buffalo, Finance Director Presenter: Sean Kaeser, Lieutenant Attachment: N/A COUNCIL ACTION DATE: :❑Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: 0 Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note.'Please write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted. Approved: e gia;•- • n. . ..ger Page 2 of 2 The use of portable radio systems is essential to provide officer safety in both day to day operations and high stress incidents in the field. Currently the Ukiah Police Department has thirty-eight (38) members who use portable radio equipment. The purchase of forty (40) new portable radios will allow two radios to be held as reserves for damage, loss, or emergency use. Based on our initial estimated pricing during testing in 2015, staff budgeted $60,000 in fund #22020200.80100, of the FY 16-17 capital replacement budget approved by the City Council. In September of 2016, Motorola Solutions Inc. was requested to provide a quote for forty (40) APX 4000 portable radio systems based on the City's requirements through the HGACBuy Contract. The HGACBuy contract is a competitively procured government-to-government cooperative purchasing program, which the City of Ukiah has utilized on several occasions for capital expenditures since 2007. Using the HGACBuy Contract quote provided by Motorola, the City is receiving a 42% discount from retail cost, for a final purchase amount of$68,808.16. Recommendations: Staff recommends that Council approve: 1. A budget amendment to fund 22020200.80100 in the amount of $8,808.16 for the purchase of new portable radios and transfer from the general fund of the same amount, and; 2. Approve the purchase of forty (40) APX 4000 portable radio systems from Motorola Solutions, Inc in the amount of$68,808.16 from account 22020200.80100. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation Budget Previous Amount in Source of Funds Account Number Amendment Contract or 16-17 FY (Title& No.) Required Purchase Order No. Yes No ❑ $60,000 Capital Equipment #22020200.80100 N/A Replacement Fund *In the amount of $8,808.16 Yes ® No ❑ $0 General Fund #11000000.95100 N/A *In the amount of $8,808.16 ITEM NO.: 11a MEETING DATE: October 19, 2016 'i' . AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT City of Ukiah SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE INTRODUCTION OF A MARIJUANA DISPENSARY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 IN DIVISION 6; TABLE 3 IN SECTION 9223.1 OF ARTICLE 18, CHAPTER 2 IN DIVISION 9; AND SECTION 9254 IN ARTICLE 19, CHAPTER 2 IN DIVISION 9 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE, ENTITLED "MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES" Summary: The City Council will receive and review a proposed Negative Declaration (Attachment 1) and Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance establishing development and operating standards for dispensaries in commercially zoned areas. Background: On October 9, 2015, the Governor signed into law AB 266, AB 243, and SB 643, which together comprise the Medical Marijuana Regulation & Safety Act ("MMRSA"). The MMRSA, which went into effect on January 1, 2016, created a statewide regulatory structure for the medical marijuana industry that also allows local governments to regulate the operation of marijuana businesses within their jurisdiction, pursuant to local ordinances. Specifically, the MMRSA allows the City of Ukiah to issue permits or licenses to operate marijuana businesses or prohibit their operation entirely, to regulate or expressly prohibit the delivery of medical marijuana within its boundaries, and to regulate or expressly prohibit the cultivation of marijuana within its boundaries. Pursuant to the MMRSA, if the City opts not to expressly prohibit or regulate the cultivation, processing, delivery, and/or dispensing of medical marijuana, the State will be the sole licensing authority for any of these activities once the State licensing and regulatory regime goes into effect, no earlier than January 1, 2018. The Ordinance was drafted through an Ad Hoc committee comprised of Councilmember Mulheren and Vice Mayor Brown, the City Manager, Planning Director, City Attorney, Assistant City Attorney, and Chief of Police. The Ad Hoc committee was created by the City Council on July 1, 2015. The Ad Hoc committee was formed in response to (1) the enactment of the MMRSA- specifically, to address any regulatory gaps in the City's current regulation of medical marijuana distribution, delivery, and cultivation that would allow Continued on Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Adopt Negative Declaration and 2. Introduce by title only the proposed an ordinance amending chapter 8 in Division 6; Table 3 in Section 9223.1 of Article 18, Chapter 2 in Division 9; and Section 9254 in Article 19, Chapter 2 in Division 9 of the Ukiah City Code, Entitled "Medical Mari'uana Dispensaries". ALTERNATIVES: Provide direction to Staff. Citizens advised: Publically noticed pursuant to Ukiah City Code Requested by: City Council Contacts/Prepared by: Kevin Thompson, Interim Planning Director and Darcy Vaughn, Assistant City Attorney Coordinated with: Marijuana Legislation and Policy Ad Hoc Presenters Kevin Thompson, Interim Planning Director and Darcy Vaughn, Assistant City Attorney Attachments: 1. Negative Declaration 2. Comments and recommendations from the Planning Commission 3. Redlined version of Ordinance 4. Clean version of Ordinance 5. Map of potential locations COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑ Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑ Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note:Please write Agreement No..in upper right corner of agreement when drafted. Approved: S , a S- gi- omo, City Manager Page 2 of 4 for sole State jurisdiction over these activities; and (2) to consider the City's policy objectives with regard to the medical marijuana industry given the proliferation of medical marijuana businesses within the County's jurisdiction. Though the MMRSA was later amended in order to preserve local authority over medical marijuana-related industry and activities or to give local government entities additional time to adopt ordinances to regulate the operation of marijuana businesses, the City Council thought it prudent to proceed with drafting and adopting an ordinance allowing and regulating medical marijuana dispensaries and the operation of such businesses. A number of local residents have inquired about the possibility of establishing and operating a medical marijuana dispensary within the city limits. Councilmember Mulheren and Vice Mayor Brown believe that the City could benefit from potential revenue derived from operation of dispensaries within the city limits, rather than losing that revenue to dispensaries located immediately outside the city limits, under County jurisdiction. Further, a number of citizens have expressed concerns regarding the lack of dispensary options in Ukiah and the difficulties in obtaining medicinal marijuana for legitimate treatment needs. Conversely, other citizens have expressed safety and siting concerns regarding dispensaries. The proposed Ordinance provides the City with local control to address these concerns. The attached Ordinance establishes a process for the issuance of "Dispensary Use Permits." It outlines, in detail, development and operational standards under which a Dispensary Use Permit will be evaluated and issued. Further, the Ordinance contains several sections pertaining to the operation, maintenance and annual permit renewal process for dispensaries; below is a summary of the key components of the Ordinance: 1. Dispensary Use Permit (§5703) - Anyone seeking to establish a Marijuana Dispensary must first obtain a Dispensary Use Permit approved and issued by the Zoning Administrator. Upon receipt of the application, the Planning Director will evaluate the application using an extensive rigorous set criteria contained in the Ordinance. Once the application is deemed complete, the Zoning Administrator will conduct a noticed public hearing. 2. Application Preparation and Filing 05709) - The Ordinance outlines the submittal requirements needed to be considered for Dispensary Use Permit. Required information includes, but is not limited to: basic information about the applicant, criminal background check, employee information, plans of operation, information about the location, floor plan, site plan, and security plan. 3. Appeals of Zoning Administrator Determinations (0712) —The Planning Commission will hear appeals of any Zoning Administrator determinations. The Planning Commission is the final decision body on appeals. 4. Use Permit Renewal (0704) — Dispensary Use Permit holders are required to renew their permit annually. The renewal process requires the Planning Director to use an extensive set of rigorous criteria to determine if the permit should be extended. The renewal decision will be rendered during a publically noticed meeting. The criteria for renewal requests includes, but is not limited to: number of police calls, inadequate safeguard procedures, failure to pay fees. 5. Limits on Location 05707) - Dispensaries will be allowed to operate upon approval of the Dispensary Use Permit in the following Zoning Districts: Commercial 1 (C1) Commercial 2 (C2), Neighborhood Commercial (CN), Manufacturing (M), Planned Development (PD)(Commercial) General Urban (GU), Urban Center (UC), and Downtown Core (DC). Within these zoning districts, the Ordinance provides citing criteria, including but not limited to: dispensary must be in a visible location with good views of the entrance from the street, cannot be within 250 feet of a youth-oriented facility (as defined in the Ordinance), or 600 feet from a school, and not within or near any residentially zoned areas. Page 3 of 4 6. Operating Requirements 05708) - Operating requirements include, but are not limited to: dispensary applicants cannot have any felony convictions, employees must be 18 or older, size of facility is limited to a size deemed appropriate given character of the neighborhood, controlled entry, restricted admittance and restroom access, medical card or prescription required for entry, no on-site consumption, Building and Fire Code compliance, retail sales is limited to (150 sq.ft.) and cultivation space limited to (500 sq.ft.). 7. Marijuana Delivery (§ 5717) - The delivery of marijuana will be allowed to qualified patients and caregivers at their residence in the City but only from dispensaries lawfully operating within City limits. Other home deliveries of marijuana are prohibited. Discussion: On both September 14 and 28, 2016, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings to gather input, provide comments and recommendations to staff on the proposed Ordinance (see Attachment 2). In response, the Ad Hoc committee met on September 19, and October 3, 2016, to discuss the comments and recommendations provided by the Planning Commission (see Attachment 3 for redlined version and Attachment 4 for a clean version of the Ordinance). In general, the Ad Hoc Committee agreed with a majority of the recommendations. However, they requested Council input on the following Planning Commission recommendations: 1. Section § 5707 Limitation on Location of Dispensary (C)(1) PC Recommendation: Increase the minimum distance a dispensary can locate from a Youth Oriented Facility from 250' to 500'. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc is concerned that the Planning Commission's recommendation of a 500-foot distance limitation from all youth-oriented facilities will unnecessarily limit possible locations of dispensaries. As such, they prefer to retain the 250-foot distance requirement for now. The Ad Hoc wishes to have a full discussion of the City Council on the distance limitation, during which a map showing the result of the distance requirements will be presented(Attachment#5). 2. Section §5710 Criteria for Review Section Zoning Administrator(b) PC Recommendation: Dispensary Use Permits should be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, not the Zoning Administrator. Ad Hoc Comments:At its October 3, 2016 meeting, the Ad Hoc indicated that it did not agree with this recommendation, preferring instead to use more of an administrative procedure to process Dispensary Use Permit applications, this will include a public notice and hearing requirement. As such, the Ad Hoc believes that the authority and duty to conduct hearings and make decisions on initial Dispensary Use Permit applications should remain with the Zoning Administrator. 3. Section §5708 Operating Requirements (f) PC Recommendation: Include in the Operating Standards section hours of operation: 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc indicated that it agreed with the Commission's recommendation to add language specifying allowable hours of operation for dispensaries, but thought it best to give the operators more flexibility to serve the needs of their patients by extending the allowable operation hours to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Implementation of the Ordinance: If adopted, the Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance will be in conflict with Table 3 in Section 9223.1 of Article 18, Chapter 2 in Division 9, allowed uses in the Downtown Zoning Code and Section 9254 in Article 19, Chapter 2 in Division 9 Marijuana Cultivation section of the Municipal Code. In order to remedy these conflicts, two additional zoning ordinance amendments are proposed as follows: Page 4 of 4 1. Table 3 in Section 9223.1 of the Downtown Zoning Code will be amended to allow marijuana dispensaries with a Dispensary Use Permit within the General Urban (GU), Urban Core (UC) and Downtown Core (DC) districts. 2. Subsection (B)(3) of Section 9254 of the City Code will be amended to resolve a conflict with between the City Code's current cultivation regulations, which allows only qualified patients and primary caregivers to cultivate limited numbers of marijuana plants, and Subsection 5708(H) in this Ordinance, which allows limited cultivation of marijuana plants for medical use by Dispensaries, which are not considered patients or primary caregivers under the MMRSA. Considerations: Staffs recommendation is to: (1) adopt the Negative Declaration (2) consider introduction by title only the proposed Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance after discussion and concurrence on the various elements. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation Budget Previous Contract Amount in Source of Funds Account Number Amendment or Purchase Order 16-17 FY (Title&No.) Required No. N/A N/A N/A Yes ❑ No ® N/A Attachment#1 I cit ,' lflkiah 9111 California Environmental Quality Act INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY AND PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROPOSED MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY ORDINANCE 1 Prepared by: City of Ukiah Department of Planning and Community Development 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 CEQA Compliance 1.2 Incorporation by Reference 1.3 Purpose 1.4 Determination of No Significant Impact 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location 2.2 Environmental Setting 2.3 Background and History 2.4 Project Characteristics/Description 2.5 Project Timing 2.6 Project Objectives 2.7 Assumptions 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED AND DETERMINATION 3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 3.2 Environmental Factors Clearly Not Affected 3.3 Environmental Determination 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4.1 Aesthetics 4.2 Utilities and Service Systems 4.3 Biological Resources 4.4 Public Services 4.5 Land Use and Planning 4.6 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 5.1 Mandatory Findings of Significance 5.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6.0 REFERENCES Appendix A. Draft Ordinance 2 CHAPTER 1.0 — INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 CEQA Compliance The City of Ukiah Department of Planning and Community Development is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance (Project) that would be located citywide. In accordance with Section 15070 through Section 15075, Negative Declaration Process, of the CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City of Ukiah. Section 15070 of the CEQA Guidelines states the following with the respect to the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration: "A public agency shall prepare or have prepared a proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration for a project subject to CEQA when: (a) The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, or (b) The initial study identifies potentially significant effects, but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. As prescribed in Section 15070, an Initial Study has been prepared that analyzes the potential project-related impacts anticipated to occur as a result of implementing the Final Closure and Post Closure Maintenance Plan for the Ukiah Landfill as proposed by the City of Ukiah. Pursuant to Section 15071 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration includes: ➢ A description of the proposed project (refer to Section 2.0); ➢ The location of the project (refer to Section 2.1); ➢ A list of the environmental factors potentially affected by project implementation (Refer to Section 3.0); ➢ A comprehensive analysis of each environmental topic included in the County's environmental checklist (refer to Chapter 4.0); ➢ A proposed finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment (refer to Section 5.1); and ➢ Mitigation measures (refer to Section 5.2). 1.2 Incorporation by Reference As allowed under Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study incorporates the Final Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance by reference. The Ordinance was utilized during the preparation of the Initial Study. The relevant information and/or analysis that has been incorporated by reference into this Initial Study has been summarized. The Final marijuana Dispensary Ordinance is available for review at the City of Ukiah Department of Planning and Community Development located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, 95482. 3 1.3 Purpose The Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance for the City of Ukiah prepared by the City of Ukiah Department of Planning and Community Development for submittal to the Ukiah City Council. The environmental document that follows is an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Ukiah Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance project as proposed by the City of Ukiah. An initial study is a preliminary analysis that is completed as part of the project design and assessment to determine whether an environmental impact report or negative declaration must be prepared to assess potential environmental impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15000 et seq.). The initial study is intended to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. A negative declaration is a written statement that briefly describes the reasons why a proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, does not require the preparation of an EIR. As indicated above, the City of Ukiah is proposing to establish and implement regulations for marijuana dispensaries, which will be implemented upon the adoption of this document by the City of Ukiah City Council. This study has been prepared in accordance with the CEQA, Public Resources Code 21000 et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq. This document provides a description of the project setting and characteristics and includes an environmental evaluation and checklist that identifies the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance, and includes a discussion of the checklist responses and findings. 1.4 Determination of No Significant Impacts This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to Section 15070 through Section 15075 of the CEQA Guidelines as prescribed in Section 1.1, above. As indicated in Chapter 5.0 of the document, no significant impacts will occur as a result of project implementation with the incorporation of appropriate mitigation measures into the final Ordinance to establish "self-mitigation." The City of Ukiah City Council will consider the information contained in this document prior to making a final decision on the proposed Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance. 4 CHAPTER 2.0 — PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location The proposed Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance would apply to the following zoning districts: Cl, C2, M, PD (Commercial), GU, UC, and DC. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries would not be allowed within residential zoning districts or within 250 feet of a "Youth-Oriented facility" (school, public park, church and licensed daycare facility). The City is approximately 4.84 square miles and is comprised of 4,997 parcels. 2.2 Environmental Setting The City of Ukiah is the county seat for Mendocino County and serves as the employment, shopping and medical hub for the region. The population is approximately 16,000 and swells to approximately 25,000-30,000 during a typical week day due to the in-migration of workers, shoppers, visitors and those in need of medical and other services. The City is densely urban with three major creeks flowing west to east towards the Russian River. The City is well forested for an urban environment and has an ample number of parks and associated open spaces. 2.3 Background and History In 2007, the City of Ukiah enacted Ordinance 1095, §1 ("Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Ordinance"), which prohibited and declared a public nuisance medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Ukiah. The 2007 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Ordinance also stated the City Council's intention was to prohibit the operation and location of dispensaries in the City "until such time as their legality is clearly established and a proposal can be developed that would sat satisfy the city council that the facility could operate without causing serious adverse impacts". On October 9, 2015, the Governor signed into law AB 266, AB 243, and SB 643, which together comprise the Medical Marijuana Regulation & Safety Act ("MMRSA"). The MMRSA, which went into effect on January 1, 2016 created a statewide regulatory structure for the medical marijuana industry that also allows local governments to regulate the operation of marijuana businesses within their jurisdiction, pursuant to local ordinances. Specifically, the MMRSA allows the City of Ukiah to issue permits or licenses to operate marijuana businesses or prohibit their operation, to regulate or expressly prohibit the delivery of medical marijuana within its boundaries, and to regulate or expressly prohibit the cultivation of marijuana within its boundaries. Pursuant to the MMRSA, if the City opts not to expressly prohibit or regulate the cultivation, processing, delivery, and/or dispensary of medical marijuana, the State will be the sole licensing authority for these activities in the City. To protect the public health, safety, and welfare, it is the desire of the City Council to modify the City Code consistent with the MMP and the MMRSA, regarding the location and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries, delivery of medical marijuana within the boundaries of the City, and cultivation of medical marijuana within the boundaries of the City. 2.4 Project Characteristics/Description The project is an ordinance regulating medical marijuana dispensaries, distribution, and cultivation in order to promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of resident and 5 businesses within the city. The ordinance requires a use permit to operate a dispensary and there are limitations on the location of dispensaries — required distances from youth-oriented facilities, parks, schools, or another dispensary. There are also dispensary operating requirements, application preparation and filing requirements, criteria for the review of dispensary use permits, use permit processing requirements, and other requirements. 2.5 Project Timing The proposed Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance would go into full force and effect 30-days after adoption by the City Council. 2.6 Project Objectives ➢ To provide reasonable regulations for marijuana dispensaries, marijuana distribution, and cultivation that would protect the public's health, safety, morals, and general welfare of residents and businesses in the city. ➢ To provide regulations that are easy to understand, explain to the public, and implement. ➢ To provide regulations that are enforceable. 2.7 Assumptions ➢ Future dispensaries would likely locate within existing commercial buildings similar to other new retail uses. Construction of new buildings to house medical marijuana dispensaries would require discretionary review and separate CEQA review. ➢ Similar to other communities of comparable size such as Sebastopol and Arcata, it is expected that if the proposed ordinance is adopted there would not be a proliferation of dispensaries. Due to market conditions and competition, it is assumed that not more than a maximum of 3 dispensaries would locate within the city limits (Sebastopol and Arcata have 1 dispensary each). ➢ Since growing marijuana in dispensaries is limited to 1,500 square feet, it is assumed that water use would be similar to that of a typical 3-bedroom, 2-bathroom single family residence with two parents and two children/teenagers, lawns, two showers, a washing machine, dishwasher, sinks, and outdoor gardening space. The average water use for a typical single family residence is 200 gallons per day. 6 CHAPTER 3.0 — ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED AND DETERMINATION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED AND DETERMINATION 3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental analysis in Section 4.0 is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, and used by the City of Ukiah in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the development's impacts and to identify mitigation. Chapter 4.0 (Environmental Analysis) analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: Aesthetics X Utilities and Service Systems X Biological Resources X Public Services X Land Use and Planning X Hydrology and Water Quality X Hazards and Hazardous Materials X For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the long term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are four possible responses: ➢ No Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment. ➢ Less Than Significant Impact. The development will have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant ➢ Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The development will have the potential to generate impacts, which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the development's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. ➢ Potentially Significant Impact. The development could have impacts, which may be considered significant, and therefore additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required, such that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels. 3.2 Environmental Factors Clearly Not Affected The Initial Study found that it can be seen with certainty that the following issue areas would not be significantly impacted and therefore no analysis is required: Agriculture and Forestry Resources: There are no prime agricultural lands or forestry lands within the City limits, therefore none would be impacted by the implementation of the proposed Marijuana Dispensary ordinance. Mineral Resources: There are mineral resource extraction facilities and no known mineral resources within the City limits, therefore none would be affected by the implementation of the proposed Marijuana Dispensary ordinance. Noise: Research reveals that the vast majority of existing medical marijuana dispensaries, including all the dispensaries in Mendocino County are operating within existing structures. It is therefore assumed that if the ordinance is enacted, new dispensaries would open in vacant retail commercial or industrial space and no noise ordinance violating construction would occur. The operation of retail medical marijuana dispensaries would be required to comply with the existing City of Ukiah noise ordinance in the same manner as other retail businesses. Population and Housing: The proposed ordinance would regulate medical marijuana dispensaries, distribution, and cultivation of marijuana (within the dispensaries) and would not, in and of itself cause the City's population to increase. Nor would the ordinance affect housing in any way because it would regulate retail businesses not residential properties. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The proposed ordinance would not result in adverse impacts to air quality because it would merely regulate certain retail businesses, and based on the small size of the city and its market area, as well as opportunities to establish outside the city limits, it is anticipated that only a small number of dispensaries would establish within the city limits. This has been the affect in other communities such as Arcata, California. Therefore, delivery vehicles associated with the dispensaries would be limited and would not substantially contribute to air pollutants. Cultural Resources: The City of Ukiah is a dense urban environment where the ground has been significantly disturbed to allow urban development for over 100 years. If medical marijuana dispensaries are established within the city as permitted by the proposed ordinance, it is assumed that they would located within existing retail commercial space and therefore there no prehistoric or historic cultural resources would be adversely impacted by the project. Recreation: The City's formal recreation services and activities are primarily conducted in the local parks and on school grounds. The ordinance specifically prohibits the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries within 250 feet of these areas to preclude impacts. Geology and Soils: Research reveals that the vast majority of existing medical marijuana dispensaries, including all the dispensaries in Mendocino County are operating within existing structures. It is therefore assumed that if the ordinance is enacted, new dispensaries would open in vacant retail commercial space and no impacts to geology and soils would result. If a new building was constructed to provide space for a medical marijuana dispensary, a geotechnical soils investigation would be required with the submittal of a building permit application as required by the California Building Code to ensure the geology and soils are adequate for the development of a foundation and building. 3.3 Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: 8 X I find that the proposed use COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effect (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, pursuant to all applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Kevin Thompson, Interim Director Planning and Community Development City of Ukiah kthompson@cityofukiah.com planning@cityofukiah.com www.cityofukiah.com CHAPTER 4.0— ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 9 The purpose of this Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Ukiah Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance is to provide an analysis of the potential environmental consequences that are anticipated to occur as a result of implementation of the ordinance in accordance with the environmental review process as implemented by the City of Ukiah. The analysis contained in this chapter includes a discussion of the anticipated impacts associated with the implementation of the Ukiah Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance as described in Chapter 2.0 (Project Description). 4.1 Aesthetics - Would the project: Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with Mitigation a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock X outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or X nighttime views in the area? Significance Criteria: A project may be deemed to have a significance adverse aesthetic impact if it results in any of the following: ➢ Changes at the site substantially degrade the character of the site, degrade an existing public viewshed, or alter the character of a public view shed by the introduction of anomalous structures or elements. ➢ Changes at the site would result in changes in the expectations of viewers (measured against the relative importance of those views) and would result in a negative impression of the view shed. (The emphasis of this criterion is on views from public areas, not views from individual lots unless view easements are involved.) ➢ Changes at the site substantially conflict with and/or do not uphold the scenic and visual quality objectives for development, as articulated in the County's General Plan goals, objectives Analysis: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 10 No Impact. There are no officially designated scenic vistas located within or in close proximity to the city limits, therefore none would be adversely impacted by a medical marijuana dispensary retail store opening in an existing retail business or industrial space. Similarly, if a building was constructed within the dense urban city environment to accommodate a medical marijuana dispensary, it would not adversely impact any official scenic vista because none exist in the city or immediate vicinity. b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. There are no officially designated scenic resources or state scenic highways within or in close proximity to the city limits, therefore none would be impacted by the establishment of a medical marijuana dispensary. Even though the western hillside overlooking the City of Ukiah is not designated as an official scenic vista, an argument could be made that the views of these hills are important. The hillside area is zoned for rural residential development and therefore according to the proposed ordinance no medical marijuana dispensary could locate in this area of the community. c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? No Impact. As noted above, it is expected that any proposed medical marijuana dispensary that establishes in the City pursuant to the provisions of the proposed ordinance would locate within the existing building in the densely urban environment of the city and therefore not create new impacts to the visual character or quality in the area. Also, as noted above, if a building was constructed within the dense urban city environment to accommodate a medical marijuana dispensary, it would be subject to design review board and planning commission review, as well as separate CEQA review, which would ensure that no new visual impacts would result from the project. If a medical marijuana dispensary erects signs for its business, they would be required to comply with existing sign regulations designed to protect the visual quality of commercial areas and therefore would not degrade visual character and quality of its surroundings. d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? No Impact. As noted above, it is expected that any proposed medical marijuana dispensary that establishes in the City pursuant to the provisions of the proposed ordinance would locate within the existing building in the densely urban environment of the city and therefore not create light or glare impacts. Nighttime and daytime views of the densely urban environment where medical marijuana dispensary would locate are of buildings, signs, motor vehicles, trees, etc., and the Ukiah City Code prohibits substantial light and glare from businesses from shining into streets. If a building was constructed within the dense urban city environment to accommodate a medical marijuana dispensary, it would be subject to design review board and planning commission review, as well as separate CEQA review, which would ensure that no impacts to daytime and nighttime visual resources would result from the project. Cumulative Impacts Since no visual quality impacts would result from implementation of the ordinance, none would contribute cumulatively to the degradation of visual quality in the City of Ukiah. 11 Mitigation Measures Project implementation will not result in any potentially significant visual impacts. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.2 Utilities and Service Systems —Would the Project: Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with Mitigation a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or X expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or X expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements X and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the X project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid X waste disposal 12 needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? Significance Criteria: The proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts if any of the following occur: ➢ The project-related demand caused an increase in wastewater treatment that reached or exceeded the current capacity of existing or planned treatment facilities or caused a reduction in the level of service, thereby requiring substantial expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new facilities. ➢ The proposed project's use of water resources will substantially and adversely deplete existing sources of domestic water. ➢ The proposed project will require the construction of new water facilities beyond those already planned and the cost of which would not be borne by the applicant. ➢ The project will generate solid waste that exceeds the capacity of the landfill to accept and disposal of the waste. Analysis: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? No Impact. While the ordinance would permit some growing (and watering) of marijuana on-site at a dispensary location, it could not exceed 1,500 square feet of area and must be contained inside of the building. The ordinance also requires cultivation practices to utilize the most water efficient methods available, and the City has the right to require annual reports on cultivation facility practices including water conservation methods. Moreover, the ordinance requires the cultivation methods to fully comply with all applicable stormwater, wastewater and building code requirements. b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. As noted above, dispensary cultivation operations are limited in size and water use and would be reviewed by water and wastewater officials. A proposed dispensary would not be allowed to be developed if water and wastewater facilities could not serve the proposal. Moreover, based on the experiences of other similar sized cities such as Arcata and Sebastopol, it is reasonable to assume that the small market area of Ukiah would not result in a proliferation of medical marijuana dispensaries. Accordingly, it is anticipated that water and wastewater services would be available to the few dispensaries that may be proposed in the City. c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. Similar to above, if the expected maximum amount of water to be used in the cultivation practices associated with a future dispensary was discharged from the sites into the 13 storm drain system, it would be comparable to the runoff from a single family residences. Moreover, it is anticipated that new dispensaries would most likely be proposed in existing buildings and therefore not increase urban stormwater runoff. In all likelihood, the water used, but not absorbed into the soil and plants would not be discharged into the storm drain system, but rather into the wastewater system or drained to landscaping on the site. No impact to the storm drain system is expected. d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? No Impact. Discussions with the City Public Works Department reveal that the City has the water supply to serve the minor demand that would be created by marijuana dispensary cultivation practices resulting from the proposed ordinance. This is based on the reasonable assumption that the small population and existing market area would not support more than a few dispensaries. However, even if more than a few dispensaries were proposed, the Public Works Department would determine if the City had the capacity to serve the proposed dispensary before granting approval just as it does with every proposed development project. e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? No Impact. Discussions with the City Public Works Department reveal that the City has the wastewater treatment capacity to serve the minor demand that would be created by marijuana dispensary cultivation practices resulting from the proposed ordinance. This is based on the reasonable assumption that the small population and existing market area would not support more than a few dispensaries. However, even if more than a few dispensaries were proposed, the Public Works Department would determine if the City had the capacity to serve the proposed dispensary before granting approval just as it does with every proposed development project. f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? No Impact. The solid waste generated from an assumed maximum of three (3) marijuana dispensary businesses is not expected to exceed what a typical retail business generates and therefore would not adversely impact solid waste pick-up and disposal operations. This was confirmed by the City Department of Public Works staff. This is based on the reasonable assumption that medical marijuana dispensaries would not generate an unusual amount of soild waste. g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. The solid waste generated from future marijuana dispensary businesses is not expected to be significant and is required to comply with all federal, state and local laws related to solid waste. Cumulative Impacts It has been concluded that the implementation of the proposed marijuana dispensary ordinance would result in minor water usage, little or no discharge of water into the stormdrain system, and little or no discharge into the wastewater systems, and therefore no impacts to the City's utility and services systems. These minor amounts of water use and discharge would be comparable 14 to approximately a typical single family residences, which according to the Department of Public Works would not result in cumulative impacts, when combined with known or foreseeable future projects. Mitigation Measures Project implementation will not result in any potentially significant impacts to utilities and service systems. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.3 Biological Resources - Would the project: Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with Mitigation a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community X identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of X the Clean Water Act(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife X species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 15 f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural X Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional,or state habitat conservation plan? Significance Criteria: The proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts if one or more of the following conditions occur as a result of implementation of the proposed project: ➢ Direct or indirect loss of individuals of a state- or federal-listed threatened or endangered species. ➢ Substantial adverse effect on a rare plant or animal species. ➢ Substantial adverse effect on a species or native plant or animal community. ➢ Substantial adverse effect on a habitat of concern. ➢ Substantial adverse effect on a critical, yet limited, resource utilized by state or federal listed threatened or endangered species. ➢ Substantial adverse effect on the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. Analysis: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. It is expected that most, if not all future marijuana dispensary businesses would locate in existing retail commercial buildings in the dense urban environment and not involve new construction, and therefore would not adversely impact plant and animal habitats and special species. However, if a new building were proposed in the future, it would be subject to discretionary review and potential impacts to plants and animals and their habitats would be evaluated through separate CEQA review. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. It is expected that most, if not all future marijuana dispensary businesses would locate in existing retail commercial buildings in the dense urban environment and not involve new construction, and therefore would not adversely impact riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities identified in planning policy documents. However, if a new building were proposed in the future, it would be subject to discretionary review and potential impacts to riparian areas. would be evaluated through separate CEQA review. c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal 16 pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. It is expected that most, if not all future marijuana dispensary businesses would locate in existing retail commercial buildings in the dense urban environment and not involve new construction, and therefore would not adversely impact wetland areas. However, if a new building were proposed in the future, it would be subject to discretionary review and potential impacts to wetlands would be evaluated through separate CEQA review. d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact. It is expected that most, if not all future marijuana dispensary businesses would locate in existing retail commercial buildings in the dense urban environment and not involve new construction, and therefore would not adversely impact movements of any native animals or fish species, wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. However, if a new building were proposed in the future, it would be subject to discretionary review and potential impacts to movements of any native animals or fish species, wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites would be evaluated through separate CEQA review. e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The City does not have any ordinances protecting biological resources, but does have tree protection policies. It is expected that most, if not all future marijuana dispensary businesses would locate in existing retail commercial buildings in the dense urban environment and not involve new construction, and therefore would not violate the City's tree protection policies. However, if a new building were proposed in the future, it would be subject to discretionary review and consistency with the City's tree protection policies would be required. f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. Any future marijuana dispensary permitted under the proposed ordinance would be located within the city limits. There is no adopted Habitat Conservation Plan applicable to the City of Ukiah and therefore none would be violated by the establishment of a marijuana dispensary locating within an existing retail commercial building or if it involved new construction. Cumulative Impacts Since no potential biological impacts were identified, none would contribute to possible cumulative impacts to biological resources. Mitigation Measures Project implementation will not result in any potentially significant biological resource impacts. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.4 Public Services —Would the Project: 17 Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with Mitigation a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical X impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1. Fire protection? X 2. Police protection X 3. Schools? X 4. Parks? X 5. Other Facilities? X Significance Criteria: The proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts if any of the following occur: ➢ An increase in the demand for fire protection services to such a degree that accepted service standards (e.g., manpower, equipment, response times, etc.) are not maintained. ➢ The interference with emergency response or evacuation plan(s) in the community or not provide internally consistent analysis or policies to guide future development. ➢ Expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. ➢ Result in response times that exceed the County's adopted maximum emergency response criteria. ➢ An increase in the demand for law enforcement services to such a degree that accepted service standards are not maintained without an increase in manpower and/or equipment. Analysis: 18 a. 1 and 2. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection or police protection? No Impact. Any future marijuana dispensary that includes indoor growing would require an electrical building permit for grow lighting and would be reviewed by the City Building Official and Fire Marshal for compliance with the State Electrical and Fire Codes. No construction would be permitted that did not comply with the State Electrical and Fire Codes. The City Police Department has assisted in the preparation of the proposed ordinance and as a result, police protection concerns related to the location, intensity, operations, land use compatibility, etc. have been fully addressed by the standards and requirements contained in the ordinance. b. 3 and 4. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools and parks? No Impact. The ordinance specifically mandates that future marijuana dispensary facilities be located a minimum of 250 feet from any school or park to eliminate any potential impacts to these facilities. c. 5. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities? No Impact. The City Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the proposed ordinance and have concluded that permitting marijuana dispensaries in commercial and industrial zones within the city, would not adversely impact their abilities to provide adequate service or require new or altered police or fire facilities to maintain acceptable response times or other performance objectives. Cumulative Impacts Since no impacts to public services were identified, none would contribute to possible cumulative impacts. Mitigation Measures Project implementation will not result in any potentially significant public service impacts. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.5 Land Use and Planning —Would the Project: Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with 19 Mitigation a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including, but not X limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Significance Criteria: The proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts if any of the following occur: ➢ Physically divide an established community. ➢ Conflict with the County of Mendocino County General Plan or zoning ordinance. ➢ Conflict with the Habitat Conservation Plan for Mendocino County. ➢ Be incompatible with adjacent land uses. Analysis: a. Physically divide an established community? No Impact. It can be seen with certainty that if marijuana dispensary business establish within an existing retail commercial building or if a new building is constructed to accommodate such businesses, the established community would not become divided. b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The project would result in permitting a new type of retail business in the City where it is currently not listed as a permitted business in the city code. Review of the general plan and other applicable planning documents reveals no conflict or inconsistency with adopted goals and polices, or with other land use regulations. c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. As noted in the Biological resources section above, the City of Ukiah does not have a Habitat Conservation Plan or natural Communities Conservation Plan, so that none would be adversely impacted by the proposed marijuana dispensary ordinance. 20 Cumulative Impacts Since no impacts to land use planning were identified, none would contribute to possible cumulative impacts. Mitigation Measures Project implementation will not result in any potentially significant land use planning impacts. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.6 Hydrology and Water Quality—Would the Project: Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with Mitigation a.Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b.Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? c.Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g., the production rate of pre - existing X nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? d.Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner,which would result in X substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? e.Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or X amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on - or off- site? f.Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing X or planned storm g.water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X 21 h.Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X i.Place housing within a 100 - year flood hazard as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood X hazard delineation map? j.Place structures within a 100 - year flood hazard area which would impede or redirect flood flows? X k.lnundation by seiche, tsunami,or mudflow? X I.Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or X equipment maintenance (including washing),waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage,delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? m.Result in the potential for discharge or stormwater to X affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? n.Create the potential for significant change in the flow X velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? o.Creates insignificant increases in erosion of the project X site or surrounding areas? Significance Criteria: ➢ The proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts if one or more of the following conditions occur as a result of implementation of the proposed project: ➢ Substantial and adverse increased inundation, sedimentation and/or damage from water forces to the subject project and/or other properties are caused by improvements such as grading, construction of barriers or structures. ➢ Development within the 100-year flood plain as delineated by FEMA that would expose people and/or property to potential serious injury and/or damage. ➢ Impervious surfaces increase and/or divert storm water runoff that results in the inability of the existing collection and conveyance facilities to accommodate the increased flows. ➢ Project implementation will cause a violation of water quality objectives for surface and groundwater as established by the Water Quality Control Plan and impede the existing beneficial uses of on-site surface waters or off-site coastal waters as defined in the Water Quality Control Plan. 22 ➢ A usable groundwater aquifer for municipal, private, or agricultural purposes is substantially and adversely affected by depletion or recharge. ➢ Storm water and/or induced runoff mixes with a tidal habitat or pond causing instability to the existing water quality (e.g., reduction of salinity below 16 ppm) which, in turn, substantially and adversely affects the sensitive brackish/saltwater marsh habitat by allowing for the introduction and establishment of invasive fresh water species. ➢ Sediments are increased and/or diverted by proposed improvements and cause sediment deposition in defined sensitive habitat areas (e.g., wetlands, jurisdictional waters) that adversely affect or significantly affect significant habitat and/or sensitive species as recognized by the applicable resource agencies. Analysis: A through o. Impacts to local hydrology and water quality No Impact. The proposed marijuana dispensary ordinance would allow dispensaries to locate within existing buildings and/or construct new buildings with the securing of a use permit. Given the small market area, it is expected that only a few dispensaries would choose to locate within the city limits. Dispensaries that located within existing buildings would not impact factors a through o listed in the Table above because they would not involve site grading or construction, or alterations to drainage patterns, wetlands, or floodplains. Construction of new buildings to house marijuana dispensaries would require discretionary review and would be required to comply with all city code requirements related to hydrology and stormwater management, locating outside floodplains, environmental quality, as well as the state building code. Cumulative Impacts Since no impacts to hydrology and water quality were identified, none would contribute to possible cumulative impacts. Mitigation Measures Project implementation will not result in any potentially significant hydrology or water quality impacts. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 23 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials —Would the Project: Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with Mitigation a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment X through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous X materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site, which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section X 65962.5, and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles X of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard X for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response X plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, X including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 24 Significance Criteria: The proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts if one or more of the following conditions occur as a result of implementation of the proposed project: ➢ Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. ➢ Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. ➢ Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. ➢ Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. ➢ Result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area if located within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. Analysis: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? No Impact. Small indoor marijuana cultivation areas associated with dispensaries could involve the use of fertilizers and insecticides. However, the amount and schedule of use would be comparable to a typical outdoor garden on a single family residential property and therefore not significant. b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? No Impact. As indicated above, the minor use of fertilizers and insecticides may occur in the future dispensaries, but because of limitations on the size of growing areas and the number of dispensaries would not result in significant hazardous conditions. c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. As indicated above, the minor use of fertilizers and insecticides may occur in the cultivation areas of future dispensaries, but because of limitations on the size of growing areas and the number of dispensaries would not result in hazardous emissions. These materials are not considered acutely hazardous. d. Be located on a site, which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. It is expected that future marijuana dispensaries would be located in existing retail commercial buildings and therefore not on any hazardous material site. Any newly proposed building intended to house a dispensary would be subject to discretionary review 25 and CEQA compliance and would be evaluated at that time. Moreover, no hazardous sites included on a list pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 exist within the city limits. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The city has an Airport Master Plan with density, height and open space requirements intended to protect people, as well as the airport. It is expected that future marijuana dispensaries would typically locate in existing buildings or construct small buildings and would not involve large concentrations of people. They would function similar to pharmacies and small retail stores and therefore would not violate the land use compatibility standards contain in the Airport Master Plan. f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. (See Item e above) g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. New marijuana dispensaries would operate similar to pharmacies and small retail stores and therefore would not conflict or interfere with any adopted emergency response plan. h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. Pursuant to the locations requirements contained in the proposed ordinance, no marijuana dispensary could be located in the western hillside area of the city, which is the only Wildland Fire hazard designated area in the City. Cumulative Impacts Since no impacts to hazards and hazardous materials were identified, none would contribute to possible cumulative impacts. Mitigation Measures Project implementation will not result in any potentially significant hazards and hazardous material impacts. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 26 CHAPTER 5.0— CONCLUSIONS 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The analysis contained in this Initial Environmental Study reveals that the proposed medical marijuana dispensary ordinance would not result in potentially significant adverse impacts on the physical environment. 5.1 Mandatory Findings of Significance Would the Project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Impact with Mitigation a. Does the project have the X potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but X cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects, which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 27 Impact Analysis a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No. Based on the findings and conclusions contained in the Initial Environmental Study, the proposed medical marijuana dispensary ordinance would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? No. Based on the findings and conclusions contained in the Initial Environmental Study, the proposed medical marijuana dispensary ordinance would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No. Based on the findings and conclusions contained in the Initial Environmental Study, the proposed medical marijuana dispensary ordinance would not have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 5.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Ukiah Department of Planning and Community Development prepared a Negative Declaration (ND) and Initial Study for the proposed project located citywide. The Initial Environmental Study and ND indicated that no potential adverse environmental impacts would result from the implementation of the proposed medical marijuana dispensary ordinance. Therefore no mitigation measures were required or identified and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program is not required. 28 CHAPTER 6.0— REFERENCES 7.0 REFERENCES 1. California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program — Mendocino County — Important Farmland 2012, Sheet 2 of 2.- ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2012/menI2 so.pdf 2. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology — Special Studies Zone, Ukiah Quadrangle. Dated January 1, 1982. 3. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection —Fire Hazard Severity Zones, Mendocino County. November 2007. http://frap.fire.ca.gov/webdata/maps/mendocino/fhszs_map.23.pdf 4. Department of Transportation - California Scenic Highway Mapping System. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic_highways/index.htm 5. County of Mendocino— The County of Mendocino General Plan. Adopted August 2009. 6. County of Mendocino— Ukiah Valley Area Plan (UVAP). Adopted 2012 7. Federal Highway Administration — Construction Noise Handbook. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/handbook/handbook00. cfm 8. Ukiah General Plan and Growth Management Plan, 1995 (2004/2009 — Housing Element)www.cityofukiah.com 9. Ukiah Municipal Airport Master Plan. Adopted 1996. 10. Ukiah WalMart Expansion EIR. Certified 2010 11. Ukiah Costco EIR. Certified 2012 12. Ukiah City Code — Medical Marijuana Dispensaries 5700-5703. Ordinance 1095 adopted 2007. 13. Ukiah Municipal Service Review, LAFCo, 2012 14. Ukiah Urban Water Management Plan, 2010 15. Ukiah City Code Zoning Regulations, Division 9, Chapter 2. 29 Attachment#2 Planning Commission comments, recommendations and Ad Hoc responses from the September 14, 2016 Public Hearing: 1. Section 5706 Imposition of Fees: The Planning Commission had questions regarding what is an appropriate fee for the processing of Dispensary Use Permit. They stated the fee should cover all the staff processing costs. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc committee agreed with staff's recommendation that a time and material cost recovery fee structure is best suited for processing Dispensary Use Permits. The deposit for a Major Use Permit is $2,000, plus any additional time and materials needed to complete the processing. Dispensary Use Permits will be charged and processed using the cost recovery method. 2. Section 5707 Limitation on Location of Dispensary (A): The Planning Commission had questions regarding conflicts with the Downtown Zoning Ordinance and the proposed Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance. Adoption of the proposed ordinance will require an amendment to the Downtown Zoning Ordinance, which currently prohibits dispensaries within any of the three downtown zoning designations (GU, UC, DC). Ad Hoc Comments: The Ordinance submitted to the Council will include an amendment to the Downtown Zoning Code allowing dispensaries with a Dispensaries Use Permit in the GU, UC and DC zoning districts. 3. Section 5707 Limitation on Location of Dispensary (C)(1): The Planning Commission suggested greater distances for dispensary locations from youth- oriented facilities than the proposed 250 feet. Ad Hoc Comments: Subsequent research revealed that State Health and Safety Code Section 11362.768 stipulates a dispensary shall be a minimum distance of 600 feet from any school, but is silent on a minimum distance from the more general designation of "youth-oriented facilities," which are not mentioned or defined in the applicable sections of the Health and Safety Code. The Ad Hoc Committee suggested two standards specifying minimum distance be incorporated into the Ordinance as follows: 1. 600 feet from a school 2. 250 feet from any youth-oriented facility(as defined in the Ordinance) 4. Section 5708 Operating Requirements (F)(1) Consumption Restrictions: The Planning Commission believes that this provision contradicts the prohibition on consumption of medical marijuana on the premises by patients. Ad Hoc Comments: Remove sections allowing employees or volunteers to smoke or vaporize on-site. 5. Section 5708 Operating Requirements (G)(1) Retail Sales and Cultivation: The Planning Commission requested clarification on the amount of square footage allowed for on-site cultivation and details on the off-site cultivation provisions. Ad Hoc Comments: Reduce the maximum interior square footage that can be devoted to cultivation from 1,500 feet to 500 feet. Cultivation areas can be used for either immature starter plants for sale or for plants intended to produce medical marijuana for sale on-site. References to off-site cultivation facilities were eliminated. 6. Section 5708 Operating Requirements (G)(2) Retail Sales and Cultivation: The Planning Commission requested clarification on provision in the Ordinance requiring 1 Attachment#2 Planning Commission approval for additional retail square footage. Ad Hoc Comments: Remove the section that references Planning Commission approval for increased retail space. The maximum retail space for retail paraphernalia will be limited to 150 square feet. 7. Section 5708 Operating Requirements (5) Retail Sales and Cultivation: The Planning Commission requested clarification on the provision regarding the maximum amount a dispensary can pay for medical marijuana. Ad Hoc Comments: Remove the statement that the dispensary shall not pay supplier(s) of medical marijuana more than the cost incurred for cultivation and preparation. 8. Section 5708 Operating Requirements (J)(K) Patient and Employee Records: The Planning Commission had questions regarding how this provision will be enforced. Ad Hoc Comments: It was discussed that the City wanted to establish a system for annual inspections conducted by the Code Enforcement division of the Police Department. This inspection would include a brief review of the records and will likely occur prior to the dispensary's renewal request. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc amended Section 5708 (v) to allow administrative inspections by City officials. 9. Section 5709 Application Preparation and Filing (12) Statement of Need: The Planning Commission asked how an applicant would demonstrate a statement of need for a dispensary. Ad Hoc Comments: Remove this section. 10. Section 5710 Criteria for Review Section Zoning Administrator: The Planning Commission indicated they wanted Dispensary Use Permits to be reviewed by the Planning Commission with a public hearing. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ordinance is very prescriptive, if an applicant meets all the standards the application should be approved and not subject to a political process. No change is suggested for this section. 11. Section 5713 Effect of Denial: The Planning Commission pointed out that this provision, if the reason for denial of the permit is not due to a criminal background or fraud, could be excessively punitive. Ad Hoc Comments: Remove the word "denial" from the provision. This means only dispensary operators whose permit was not renewed due to violations of the Ordinance would be subject to three year waiting period. Planning Commission comments, recommendations and Ad Hoc responses from the September 28, 2016 Public Hearing: 1. Section 5702 Definitions: The Planning Commission recommended an expanded definition of youth oriented facilities to include: museums and libraries. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc agreed with this recommendation. 2. Section 5707 Limitation on Location of Dispensary(C)(1): The Planning Commission recommended an increase the minimum distance a dispensary can 2 Attachment#2 locate from a youth oriented facility from 250-feet to 500-feet. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc is concerned that the Planning Commission's recommendation of a 500- foot distance limitation from all youth oriented facilities will unnecessarily limit possible locations of dispensaries. As such, they prefer to retain the 250-foot distance requirement for now. The Ad Hoc wishes to have a full discussion of the City Council on the distance limitation, during which a map showing the result of the distance requirements will be presented. 3. Section 5708 Operating Requirements (f): The Planning Commission recommended the inclusion into the Operating Standards section, hours of operation of: 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc indicated that it agreed with the Commission's recommendation to add language specifying allowable hours of operation for dispensaries, but thought it best to give the operators more flexibility to serve the needs of their patients by extending the allowable operation hours to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 4. Section 5703 Dispensary Use Permit Required to Operate (c): The Planning Commission recommended the addition of strong language that indicates approval of a Medical Dispensary does not automatically entitle the permit holder to a recreational retail outlet for a marijuana permit, and that the regulation of medical marijuana dispensaries in the City does not allow or permit recreational marijuana businesses or activities. Ad Hoc Comments:At its October 3, 2016 meeting, the Ad Hoc indicated that it agreed with the Commission's recommendation to add language indicating that this Ordinance does not permit non-medical marijuana businesses or commercial activities. 5. Section 5701 Interpretation and Applicability (b): The Planning Commission recommended the addition of language requiring compliance with the Fire Code. Ad Hoc Comments:At its October 3, 2016 meeting, the Ad Hoc indicated it agreed with the Commission's recommendation to add language requiring compliance with the fire code. 6. Section 5710 Criteria for Review Section Zoning Administrator(b): The Planning Commission recommended that Dispensary Use Permits should be heard by the Planning Commission, not the Zoning Administrator. Ad Hoc Comments:At its October 3, 2016 meeting, the Ad Hoc indicated that it did not agree with this recommendation, preferring instead to use more of an administrative procedure to process Dispensary Use Permit applications, and this will include a public notice and hearing requirement. As such, the Ad Hoc believes that the authority and duty to conduct hearings and make decisions on initial Dispensary Use Permit applications should remain with the Zoning Administrator. 7. 5704 Term of Permits and Renewals Required: The Planning Commission recommended inclusion of a public notice requirement for renewal applications. Ad Hoc Comments:At its October 3, 2016 meeting, the Ad Hoc indicated that it agreed with the Commission's recommendation to include public notice requirements for Dispensary Use Permit renewal applications. The Planning Commission did not 3 Attachment#2 specify whether the notice requirements should mirror the current procedure for a minor use permit or for a major use permit. As the initial application for a Permit is heard by the Zoning Administrator, who is also authorized to hear minor use permit applications, staff recommends modelling the renewal hearing process on the minor use permitting process. In addition, Section 9263 of the City Code, referred to in the Ordinance, does not make any reference to the Planning Director, so this language has been added. 8. The Planning Commission recommended limiting the number of dispensaries allowed within the City limits to five. The Ad Hoc indicated it did not want to limit the number of dispensaries based on the notion that the annual renewal process will weed out the bad dispensaries, and limiting the number could prevent the well- operated dispensary the opportunity to apply for a Dispensary Use Permit. 9. 5703 Dispensary Use Permit Required to Operate: The Planning Commission recommended amending the Ordinance to require that applicants for a Dispensary Use Permit obtain all applicable State licenses and permits prior to applying for a Dispensary Use Permit. Ad Hoc Comments: The Ad Hoc noted that Section 5703, subparagraph (b) already states that anyone operating a Dispensary must obtain all required State licenses and permits under the MMRSA. No change is suggested for this Section. However, in response to the recommendation, the Ad Hoc did amend Section 5709, subparagraph (H)(25) requiring an applicant for a Dispensary Use Permit to submit any information necessary to show compliance with State law. 4 Attachment#3 Attachment#3(Redline) ORDINANCE NO.2016- ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING CHAPTER 8 IN DIVISION 6; TABLE 3 IN SECTION 9223.1 OF ARTICLE 18, CHAPTER 2 IN DIVISION 9; AND SECTION 9254 IN ARTICLE 19, CHAPTER 2 IN DIVISION 9 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE, ENTITLED"MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES" The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows. SECTION 1 Chapter 8 in Division 6 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: §5700 FINDINGS AND PURPOSE The City Council adopts the ordinance codified in this Chapter based upon the following findings: (A) In 1970, congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act ("CSA") which, among other things, makes it illegal to import, manufacture, distribute, possess or use marijuana in the United States. (B) In 1996, the voters of the state of California approved Proposition 215, codified at Health and Safety Code§11362.5 et seq. (the"Act"). (C)The Act creates a limited exception from criminal liability for seriously ill persons who are in need of medical marijuana for specified medical purposes and who obtain and use medical marijuana under limited, specified circumstances. (D) On January 1, 2004, SB 420 went into effect. SB 420, codified as Health and Safety Code §§ 11362.7 — 11362.83 and known as the "Medical Marijuana Program" ("MMP") was enacted by the state legislature to clarify the scope of the act and to allow cities and other governing bodies to adopt and enforce rules and regulations consistent with SB 420. (E)After the enactment of the MMP and in response to the MMP's explicit reservation of local authority to regulate medical marijuana cultivation and distribution, the City Council took legislative notice of the fact that California cities and counties that had permitted the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries had experienced serious adverse impacts associated with and resulting from such dispensaries, including an increase in crime, including burglaries, robberies, violence, illegal sales of marijuana use of marijuana by minors and other persons without medical need in the areas immediately surrounding such medical marijuana dispensaries; and malodorous smells, indoor fire hazards, mold, fungus, and pests caused by indoor cultivation at dispensaries. (F) To address these potential adverse impacts, in 2007, the City Council enacted Ordinance 1095, §1 ("Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Ordinance"), which prohibited and declared a public nuisance medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Ukiah. (G) The 2007 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Ordinance also states that the City Council's intention is to prohibit the operation and location of dispensaries in the City"until such 1 Attachment#3(Redline) time as their legality is clearly established and a proposal can be developed that would satisfy the city council that the facility could operate without causing [serious adverse impacts]". (H) On October 9, 2015, the Governor signed into law AB 266, AB 243, and SB 643, which together comprise the Medical Marijuana Regulation & Safety Act ("MMRSA"). The MMRSA, which went into effect on January 1, 2016, created a statewide regulatory structure for the medical marijuana industry that also allows local governments to regulate the operation of marijuana businesses within their jurisdiction, pursuant to local ordinances. Specifically, the MMRSA allows the City of Ukiah to issue permits or licenses to operate marijuana businesses or prohibit their operation, to regulate or expressly prohibit the delivery of medical marijuana within its boundaries, and to regulate or expressly prohibit the cultivation of marijuana within its boundaries. Pursuant to the MMRSA, if the City opts not to expressly prohibit or regulate the cultivation, processing, delivery, and/or dispensing of medical marijuana, the State will be the sole licensing authority for these activities in the City. (I)To protect the public health, safety, and welfare, it is the desire of the City Council to modify the City Code consistent with the MMP and the MMRSA, regarding the location and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries, delivery of medical marijuana within the boundaries of the City, and cultivation of medical marijuana within the boundaries of the City. (J) There have been a number of marijuana dispensing-related incidents in California, some including acts of violence committed by persons without a legitimate medical need to use marijuana. (K) The City Council finds that medical marijuana dispensing which exceeds the limitations set forth in these regulations will likely result in an unreasonable risk of crime and other adverse impacts and will likely create offensive odors to persons living nearby. (L) It is the City Council's intention that nothing in this Chapter shall be construed to (1) allow persons to engage in conduct that endangers others or causes a public nuisance; (2) allow the use of marijuana for non-medical purposes; or (3) allow any activity relating to the distribution or consumption of marijuana that is otherwise illegal. (M) Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code § 11362.71 et seq., the State Department of Health through the state's counties, is to be responsible for establishing and maintaining a voluntary medical marijuana identification card program for qualified patients and primary caregivers. (N) Health and Safety Code § 11362.71(b) requires every county health department, or its designee, to implement a procedure to accept and process applications from those seeking to join the identification program in the manner set forth in§ 11362.71 et seq. (0) This Chapter is compatible with the general objectives of the general plan, in that a Medical Marijuana Dispensary use will be conditionally permitted in commercial and industrial districts, being similar to other permitted and conditionally permitted uses, such as pharmacies and medical clinics,and in that the use will be subject to strict review and conditions. (P) This Chapter will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or adversely affect the orderly development of property, because the uses permitted under this 2 Attachment#3(Redline) Chapter will be subject to careful review, limited in scope and location, and subject to strict operating requirements, avoiding or limiting potential negative effects. (Q) It is the purpose and intent of this Chapter to regulate medical marijuana dispensaries in order to promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of residents and businesses within the City. §5701 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICABILITY. (A)This Ordinance is not intended to create a positive conflict with the CSA, but rather to implement the MMRSA and related state laws. (B) Nothing in this Ordinance is intended, nor shall it be construed, to exempt any marijuana related activity from any and all applicable local and state construction, electrical, plumbing, land use,or any other building,fire, or land use standards or permitting requirements. Comment[DV1]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it agreed with (C) Nothing is this Ordinance is intended, nor shall it be construed, to make legal any the Commission's recommendation to add language requiring compliance with the fire code. cultivation, transportation, sale, or other use of marijuana that is otherwise prohibited under California law. (D)All processing and distribution of medical marijuana within city limits shall be subject to the provisions of this Chapter, even if the processing, distribution, or cultivation existed or occurred prior to adoption of this Chapter. (E) Nothing in this Ordinance is intended, nor shall it be construed, to allow or permit any "commercial cannabis activity," as defined in Business and Professions Code Section 19319(j) or any commercial or non-commercial activity involving marijuana use for recreational or other non-medical purposes that is not expressly authorized in the Ukiah City Code. Comment[DV2]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it agreed with the Commission's recommendation to add language indicating that this Ordinance does not permit non - §5702 DEFINITIONS. medical marijuana businesses or commercial activities. For the purpose of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the Comment[D3]:revised to expressly include all following meaning: activities licensed under MCRA. (A)"Accessory building"shall have the same meaning as set forth in City Code§9278. (B) "Applicant" means a person who is required to file an application for a permit under this Chapter, including an individual owner, managing partner, officer of a corporation, or any other operator, manager, employee, or agent of a Dispensary. (C)"City"means the City of Ukiah. (D) "Delivery" shall have the same definition as set forth in California Business and Professions Code§ 19300.5 and as it may be amended. (E) "Dispensary Use Permit" means a permit required to operate a Medical Marijuana Dispensary within the City and that is issued pursuant to this Chapter. 3 Attachment#3(Redline) (F)"Drug paraphernalia"or"paraphernalia"shall have the same definition as set forth in City Code§6071. (G)"Identification card"shall have the same definition as in California Health and Safety Code§ 11362.7, and as it may be amended. (H)"Medical Marijuana Dispensary"or"Dispensary"means a"Dispensary"as defined in California Business and Professions Code § 19300.5, as it now reads or may be amended in the future and includes any association, cooperative, affiliation, or collective of persons where multiple qualified patients and/or primary care givers, are organized to provide education, referral, or network services, and facilitation or assistance in the lawful, retail distribution of medical marijuana. A Medical Marijuana Dispensary shall not include the dispensing of marijuana by primary caregivers to qualified patients in the following locations and uses, as long as the location of such uses are otherwise regulated by this Code or applicable law: a clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, a health care facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illness licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, a residential hospice, or a home health agency licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, as long as any such use complies strictly with applicable law including, but not limited to, Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 et seq., or a qualified patient's or caregiver's place of residence. (I) "On-Site" means an activity or accessory use that is related to the primary use— i.e. lawful, retail distribution of medical marijuana — but is located on the same legal parcel as the primary use. (J)"Permittee"means the person (1)to whom a Dispensary Use Permit is issued and (2) who is identified in California Health and Safety Code§ 11362.7, subdivision (c)or(d), or(e)or (f). (K) "Person" means any individual, partnership, co-partnership, firm, association, joint stock company, corporation, limited liability company or combination of the above in whatever form or character. (L) "Person with an identification card" shall have the same definition as set forth in California Health and Safety Code§ 11362.7 , and as it may be amended. (M) "Physician" means a licensed medical doctors (M.D.) and doctors of osteopathic medicine(D.O.)as defined in the California Business and Professions Code. (N) "Planning Director" means the Planning Director of the City of Ukiah or the authorized representative thereof. (0) "Primary caregiver" shall have the same definition as set forth in California Health and Safety Code§ 11362.7, and as it may be amended. (P) "Qualified patient" shall have the same definition as set forth California Health and Safety Code§ 11362.7,and as it may be amended. 4 Attachment#3(Redline) (Q) "School" means an institution of learning for minors, whether public or private, offering a regular course of instruction required by the California Education Code. This definition includes an elementary school, middle or junior high school, senior high school, or any special institution of education, but it does not include a vocational or professional institution of higher education, including any other college or university. (R)"Use Permit"shall have the same definition as set forth in City Code§9261 and as it may be amended. (S) "Youth-oriented facility" means a public park, church, museum, library, and licensed Comment[DV4]:At its October 3,2016 daycare facility. meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it agreed with the Commission's recommendation to expand the definition of"Youth-oriented facility"to include (T) "Zoning Administrator" means the Zoning Administrator of the City of Ukiah or the museums and libraries. authorized representative thereof. §5703 DISPENSARY USE PERMIT REQUIRED TO OPERATE. (A) It is unlawful for any person to engage in, conduct or carry on, or to permit to be engaged in, conducted or carried on, in or upon any premises in the City the operation of a Medical Marijuana Dispensary unless the person first obtains and continues to maintain in full force and effect a Dispensary Use Permit from the City as required in this Chapter. (B)After January 1, 2018, or such time when State implementing regulations are in effect for the MMRSA, whichever is earlier, it shall be unlawful to operate any business or conduct any activity in the City for which a State license is required under the MMRSA without also having a valid State license pursuant to the MMRSA. Prior to implementation of the State license program pursuant to MMRSA, any operation of a Dispensary, cultivation of medical marijuana, or delivery of medical marijuana permitted by the City shall be conducted in accordance with this Chapter, the City's Zoning and Land Use Ordinances, and all laws pertaining to the equivalent license classification under the MMRSA. (C) The grant of a Dispensary Use Permit by the City shall not create an entitlement or vested right in the permitee to any permit or license to operate any commercial, non-medical marijuana businesses or conduct any commercial, non-medical marijuana activities within the City. Comment[DVS]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it agreed with §5704 TERM OF PERMITS AND RENEWALS REQUIRED. the Commission's recommendation to add language indicating that this Ordinance does not permit non- medical marijuana businesses or commercial (A) Dispensary Use Permits issued under this Chapter shall expire one year following activities. the date of their issuance which date shall appear on the face of the permit. (B) Dispensary Use Permits may be renewed by the Planning Director for additional one- year periods upon application by the permittee, unless the permit is suspended or revoked in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. (C)Applications for renewal shall be made at least 45 days before the expiration date of the permit and shall be accompanied by the nonrefundable application fee referenced in Section 5706 and all information necessary for the Planning Director to evaluate the renewal request in light of the criteria listed in (E) below. In acting on an application for renewal the Planning Director shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 5711(B), except that all references 5 Attachment#3(Redline) therein to the Zoning Administrator shall be deemed to refer to the Planning Director. Upon timely application to renew a permit, the permit being renewed shall remain in effect until final action is taken to grant or deny the renewal application. (D)Applications for renewal made less than 45 days before the expiration date shall be processed in the same manner as a timely renewal application but shall not stay the expiration date of the permit. (E) Renewal applications shall be subject to duly noticed public hearings in accordance to the procedures set forth for minor use permit applications in Section 9262 of Division 9, Chapter 2, Article 20 of the City Code, except that all references therein to the Zoning Administrator shall be deemed to refer to the Planning Director. Comment[DV6]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it agreed with (F) In determining whether to renew a Dispensary Use Permit, the Planning Director will the commission s recommendation to include public notice requirements for Dispensary Use consider the following non-exclusive criteria, in addition to those criteria set forth in this Chapter Permit renewal applications.The Planning at§§5709(G)and 5710: Commission did not specify whether the notice requirements should mirror the current procedure for a minor use permit or for a major use permit.As 1. Whether the Dispensary operated by the permittee has generated an excessive the initial application for a Permit is heard by the number of calls for police service compared to similarly situated businesses of Zoning Administrator,who is also authorized to hear the same size as the Dispensary. minor use permit applications,it would probably make the most sense to model the renewal hearing 2. Whether there have been excessive secondary criminal or public nuisance process on the minor use permitting process.In impacts in the surrounding area or neighborhood, including, but not limited to, addition,Section 9263 referred to in the Ordinance disturbances of the peace, illegal drug activity, marijuana use in public, does not make any reference to the Planning harassment of passersby, littering, loitering, illegal parking, loud noises, or lewd Director,501 have added this language. conduct. 3. Whether the Dispensary operated by the permittee has a history of inadequate safeguards or procedures that show it is likely that it will not comply with the operating requirements and standards in this Chapter. 4. Whether the Dispensary has failed to pay fees, penalties, or taxes required by this Code or has failed to comply with the production of records or other reporting requirements of this Chapter. 5. Whether it appears that the permittee has, in its renewal application, provided a false statement of material fact or has knowingly omitted a material fact. 6. Whether the renewal applicant or one or more of its officers, employees, partners, managers or members with management responsibilities ("Managers") has been convicted of a felony, or has engaged in misconduct that is substantially related to the qualifications, functions or duties of a Dispensary operator. A conviction within the meaning of this section means a plea or verdict of guilty, or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere. Notwithstanding the above, an application shall not be denied solely on the basis that the applicant or any Manager has been convicted of a felony, if the person convicted has obtained a certificate of rehabilitation (expungement of felony record) under California law or under a similar federal statute or state law where the expungement was granted. Comment[DV7]:At its October 3,2016 7. Whether the renewal applicant or Dispensary has previously or is currently meeting,the ad hoc discussed its concerns about engaged in unlawful,fraudulent, unfair, or deceptive business acts or practices. whether authorizing the Planning Directortoonly grant or deny renewal applications could be unnecessarily limiting and punitive.As such,the ad (G) The Planning Director shall make findings of fact and either grant, grant hoc determined that the best course of action conditionally, or deny the application for renewal of a Dispensary Use Permit. An applicant would be to allow the Planning Director to grant a aggrieved by the Planning Director's decision to issue or to deny a Dispensary Use Permit renewalapplication,subjecttoconditionsto address concerns with,for example,the permittee's renewal may appeal such decision to the Planning Commission by filing an appeal. All operation of the Dispensary. 6 Attachment#3(Redline) determinations of the Planning Director regarding Dispensary Use Permit renewals shall be final unless a written appeal, stating the reasons for the appeal, and the appeal fee, if any, as established by resolution of the City Council from time to time, are filed with the Planning Department within ten (10) days of the date the decision was made. The appeal fee will be in addition to the nonrefundable renewal application fee.Appeals may be filed by an applicant.. Comment[DVs]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc discussed its concerns about whether allowing an interested party to file an The Planning Commission shall conduct a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal in appeal of the Planning Director's decision on a accordance to the applicable procedures as set forth in Section 9266 of Division 9, Chapter 2, renewal application would lead to abuse of process Article 20 of the City Code, except that all references therein to the City Council shall be and waste of resources.The ad hoc also discussed deemed to refer to the Planning Commission. At the close of the public hearing, the Planning the fact that interested parties do have an opportunity to participate in the process during the Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify the appealed decision of the Planning Director. All initial hearing on the decision to grant,grant Planning Commission decisions on appeals of the Planning Director's decision with regard to an conditionally,or deny the renewal application.As application for a Dispensary Use Permit renewal are final for the City. such,the ad hoc has opted to limit the authority to appeal decisions on renewal application to the applicant. §5705 GENERAL TAX LIABILITY. Comment[DV9]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc noted that Division 9,Chapter As a prerequisite to obtaining a permit pursuant to the terms hereof, an operator of a 2,Article 20 includes notice and hearing procedures Dispensary shall also be required to apply for and obtain a Business License or exemption from for six different types of permitting actions.Section 9266 of Division 9,Chapter 2,Article 20 sets forth the City of Ukiah and obtain a seller's permit or exemption from the State Board of Equalization the procedures for appeals of decisions on pursuant to Division 2, Part 2, Chapter 2, Article 2 of the Cal. Revenue and Taxation Code, permitting actions.As such,Section 9266 would be commencing with Section 6066e. Dispensary sales shall be subject to sales tax consistent with appropriate to apply here,except that the Planning State law. Commission would have the duty and authority to hear appeals rather than the City Council. §5706 IMPOSITION OF FEES. Every application for a Dispensary Use Permit or renewal shall be accompanied by an application fee, as established by resolution of the City Council from time to time. This application or renewal fee shall not include fingerprinting, photographing,and background check costs and shall be in addition to any other business license fee or permit fee imposed by this Code or other governmental agencies. Fingerprinting, photographing, and background check fees will be as established by resolution adopted by the City Council from time to time. §5707 LIMITATION ON LOCATION OF DISPENSARIES. Comment[DV10]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it did not agree '.... (A)A Dispensary may only be located within the Cl, C2, CN, M, and PD (Commercial) with the Planning Commission's l recommendation,henmbe as it is concerned that this may limit the number of zoning districts and in the GU, UC, and DC downtown zoning districts as designated in the quality applicants for Dispensary Use Permits that General Plan,Zoning Map. the City may consider.The ad hoc also believes that, given the demanding process for obtaining and '.... retaining a Dispensary Use Permit,the process may (B) A Dispensary shall be in a visible location that provides good views of the be self-selecting,and that,as such,the City is Dispensary entrance,windows and premises from a public street. unlikely to see more than a couple of applicants complete the process.As such,the ad hoc prefers to omit the limitation on the number of dispensaries (C)A Dispensary shall not be allowed in the following areas at the time of its permitted for now,in anticipation of a discussion of this issue establishment: by the City Council. Comment[DV11]:The ad hoc is concerned that (1) Within 600 feet of a School, with that distance measured as the horizontal the Planning Commission's recommendation of a distance in a straight line from the property line of the School to the closest property line 500 foot distance limitation from all youth-oriented faof the lot on which the Dispensary is to be located without regard to intervening dispensaries. will As such, prefertoretble locations ns0f p Y g dispensaries.As such,they to retain the 250 structures;or foot distance limitation for now.The ad hoc wishes to have a full discussion of the City Council on the (2) Within 250 feet of a Youth-oriented facility other than a School, or another distance limitation during which a map showing the result of the distance limitations will be available for '.. Dispensary,with that distance measured by street frontage and not radial distance; or review. 7 Attachment#3(Redline) (3) Abutting, on any side of the parcel upon which the Dispensary is located, a parcel occupied by a Youth-oriented facility, a School, or another Dispensary; or (4) Within any residential zoned parcel or primary land use, or any property with an underlying residential or mobile homes general plan land use designation. (5) On a parcel having a residential unit, or on a parcel directly abutting a residentially-zoned property, unless there are intervening non-residential uses between the Dispensary and the residential unit or the residentially-zoned property that the Zoning Administrator or, on appeal, the Planning Commission determines sufficient to provide an appropriate separation. (D) The distance between a Dispensary and above listed uses shall be made in a straight line, along street frontage, from the boundary line of the property on which the Dispensary is located to the boundary of the property on which the facility, building or structure, or portion of the building or structure, in which the above listed use occurs or is located. (E) A waiver of the provisions in subsection (C) of this Section may be granted if the applicant demonstrates on plans and materials presented for review and the Zoning Administrator or, on appeal, the Planning Commission determines that a physical barrier or similar condition exists which achieves the same purpose and intent as the distance separation requirements established herein. §5708 OPERATING REQUIREMENTS. Dispensary operations shall be established and managed only in compliance with the following standards: (A) Criminal History. Any applicant, his or her agent or employees, volunteer workers, or any person exercising managerial authority of a Dispensary on behalf of the applicant shall not have been convicted of any of the felony offenses enumerated in Health and Safety Code § 19323(b)(5), or of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, or on probation for a drug offense, or engaged in misconduct related to the qualifications, functions or duties of a permittee. A conviction within the meaning of this Section means a plea or verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere. (B) Minors. (1) It is unlawful for any permittee, operator, or other person in charge of any Dispensary to employ any person who is not at least 18 years of age. (2) Persons under the age of 18 shall not be allowed on the premises of a Dispensary unless they are a qualified patient or a primary caregiver, and they are in the presence of their parent or guardian for the first visit. (3)The entrance to a Dispensary shall be clearly and legibly posted with a notice indicating that persons under the age of 18 are precluded from entering the premises unless they are a qualified patient or a primary caregiver, and they are in the presence of their parent or guardian for the first visit. (4) The burden of proof is on the Dispensary personnel to establish compliance with this subsection (B)by clear and convincing evidence. 8 Attachment#3(Redline) (D) Dispensary Size and Access. (1) Dispensary size shall be limited, as deemed appropriate and necessary, to best serve patient needs within the intent of this Chapter and reduce potential adverse impacts that might otherwise occur on surrounding neighborhoods, businesses and demands on City services. (2) A Dispensary shall not be increased in size (i.e., floor area or number of patients)without a prior approval amending the existing Dispensary Use Permit. (3) The entrance into the Dispensary building shall be locked at all times with entry strictly controlled; e.g., a buzz-in electronic/mechanical entry system with a vestibule is highly encouraged. A viewer shall be installed in the door that allows maximum angle of view of the exterior entrance. (4) Dispensary personnel shall monitor site activity, control loitering and site access. (5) Only Dispensary staff, primary caregivers, qualified patients and persons with bona fide purposes for visiting the site shall be permitted at a Dispensary. (6) Potential patients or caregivers shall not visit a Dispensary without first having obtained a valid written recommendation from their physician recommending use of medical marijuana. (7) Only a primary caregiver and qualified patient shall be permitted in the designated dispensing area with Dispensary personnel.All other authorized visitors shall remain in the designated waiting area in the front entrance/lobby. (8) Restrooms shall remain locked and under the control of management. (E) Dispensing Operations. (1) A Dispensary shall dispense medical marijuana to meet monthly medication needs of qualified patients, similar to typical pharmacy operations. The Dispensary shall strongly discourage and avoid daily or weekly visits by patients as a routine practice. The Dispensary may possess no more dried marijuana or plants per qualified patient or caregiver than permitted in strict accordance with California Health and Safety Code § 11362.77 and any other applicable State law, and as amended. (2)A Dispensary shall only dispense to qualified patients or caregivers with: (a) a currently valid physician's approval or recommendation in compliance with the criteria in California Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 et seq. and valid official identification, such as a Department of Motor Vehicles driver's license or State Identification Card, or (b) a currently valid California Medical Marijuana Identification Card or a Patient ID Center Identification Card. (3) For qualified patients or caregivers without a California Medical Marijuana Identification Card or a Patient ID Center Identification Card, prior to dispensing medical marijuana, the Dispensary shall obtain verbal, online, or signed verification from the recommending physician's office personnel that the individual requesting medical marijuana is a qualified patient. (4) A Dispensary shall not have a physician on-site to evaluate patients and provide a recommendation for medical marijuana. (5) Patient records shall be maintained and verified as needed, and at least annually verified with the qualifying patient's medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy unless the patient has provided a California Medical Marijuana Identification Card or a Patient ID Center Identification Card. (6) Information on prior year's operations shall be provided annually, as required in this Chapter.The operator shall adjust the operations as necessary to address issues. 9 Attachment#3(Redline) (F) Hours of Operation (1) Hours of Operation are limited to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., seven days a week. Comment[DV12]:At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it agreed with (G)Consumption Restrictions, the Commission's recommendation to add language specifying allowable hours of operation for (1) Marijuana shall not be consumed on the premises of the Dispensary. The Dispensaries,but thought it best to give the term "premises" includes the actual building, as well as any accessory structures, operators more flexibility to serve the needs of their parking areas,or other surroundings within 200 feet of the Dispensary's entrance. patience by extending the allowable operation hours. (2) Dispensary operations shall not result in illegal redistribution of medical marijuana obtained from the Dispensary, or use in any manner that violates local, State or City Codes. (3) No person may consume marijuana, by smoking or vaporization, in any public places. Public places shall include, but are not limited to, city owned parks and/or city sponsored events where designated as nonsmoking areas by resolution of the city council, streets, sidewalks, alleys, highways, public parking lots as defined in City Code § 6000 and as amended, enclosed places and places of employment as defined in City Code §§ 4503 and 4505 and as amended, and any other property owned or leased by the City, or in which the City holds a right-of-way easement, and which is open to members of the general public, except while actively passing through on the way to another destination. Nothing in this Section is intended, nor shall it be construed to be inconsistent with the California Indoor Clean Air Act of 1976, Health and Safety Code § 118875 et seq and as amended. (H) Retail Sales and Cultivation. (1) No cannabis shall be cultivated on the premises of the Dispensary, except in compliance with this Chapter and with City Code §§ 6093 and 9254 and Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 et seq. The space devoted to on-site cultivation at a permitted Dispensary shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the total floor area, but in no case more than five hundred square feet. Cultivation shall be limited to interior areas of buildings. (a) Except for immature nursery stock marijuana plants, marijuana plants grown by the Dispensary shall only be utilized for production of processed marijuana to dispense to patients. (b) A security plan for the growing area shall be submitted to the Ukiah Police Chief for review and approval. Such plan shall include: security alarms and surveillance systems; physical measures to prevent access to the area by anyone other than Dispensary staff; and physical measures to prevent vehicle penetration of the growing area. (c) If required by the Building Official, the cultivation area shall include a one-hour firewall assembly and shall not create excessive humidity or mold conditions. The cultivation area shall have an air treatment system that prevents odors generated from the cultivation of marijuana on the Dispensary property from being detected by any reasonable person of normal sensitivity outside the Dispensary property, as set forth in City Code § 5708(H)(4). The medical marijuana cultivation area shall be in compliance with the current, adopted edition of the California Building Code as regards Natural Ventilation or Mechanical Ventilation. (d) Cultivation facilities are strongly encouraged to utilize the most water- efficient and environmentally-responsible cultivation practices available. The City reserves the right to require annual reports on cultivation facility practices, including but not limited to cultivation mediums and water use methods. 10 Attachment#3(Redline) (e) The cultivation use shall comply with applicable stormwater, wastewater, and Building Code requirements and any applicable State or Federal law, including the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.§ 1251 et seq. (2)With the approval of the Zoning Administrator, a Dispensary may conduct or engage in the commercial sale of specific products, goods or services in addition to the provision of medical marijuana and other items permitted by these regulations on terms and conditions consistent with this Chapter and applicable law. (3) Up to 150 square feet may be utilized for display and sales of devices necessary for administering medical marijuana, including but not limited to rolling papers and related materials and devices, pipes, water pipes, and vaporizers. Such devices may only be provided to qualified patients or primary caregivers and only in accordance with Health and Safety Code§ 11364.5 and as amended. (4) Retail sales of medical marijuana that violate California law or this Chapter are expressly prohibited. (5)A Dispensary shall meet all the operating criteria for the dispensing of medical marijuana as is required pursuant to California Health and Safety Code§ 11362.5 et seq and as amended. (6)The provision of locally-grown and organic marijuana is encouraged. (I)Operating Plans. (1) Floor Plan. A Dispensary shall have a lobby waiting area at the entrance to receive clients, and a separate and secure designated area for dispensing medical marijuana to qualified patients or designated caregivers. The primary entrance shall be located and maintained clear of barriers, landscaping and similar obstructions so that it is clearly visible from public streets, sidewalks or site driveways. (2) Storage. A Dispensary shall have suitable locked storage on premises, identified and approved as a part of the security plan, for after-hours storage of medical marijuana. (3) Minimum Staffing Levels. The premises shall be staffed with at least one person during hours of operation who shall not be responsible for dispensing medical marijuana. (4) Odors Control. The Dispensary shall have an air treatment system that prevents odors generated from the storage and cultivation of marijuana on the Dispensary property from being detected by any reasonable person of normal sensitivity outside the Dispensary property. To achieve this, both the storage and cultivation areas shall be, at minimum, mechanically ventilated with a carbon filter or superior method. (5) Security Plans. A Dispensary shall provide adequate security on the premises, as approved by the Chief of Police and reviewed by the Planning Commission, including lighting and alarms, to insure the safety of persons and to protect the premises from theft. (6) Security Cameras. Security surveillance cameras shall be installed to monitor the main entrance and exterior of the premises to discourage loitering, crime, illegal or nuisance activities. (7)Security Video Retention. Security video shall be maintained for 90 days. (8) Alarm System. Professionally monitored robbery alarm and burglary alarm systems shall be installed and maintained in good working condition. (9) Emergency Contact. A Dispensary shall provide the Chief of Police with the name, e-mail address, phone number and facsimile number of an on-site community relations staff person to whom one can provide notice if there are operating problems associated with the Dispensary. The Dispensary shall make every good faith effort to 11 Attachment#3(Redline) encourage neighborhood residents to call this person to try to solve operating problems, if any, before any calls or complaints are made to the City. (J)Signage and Notices. (1) A notice shall be clearly and legibly posted in the Dispensary indicating that smoking, ingesting or consuming marijuana on the premises or in the vicinity of the Dispensary is prohibited. The notice shall be posted in both English and Spanish. (2)Signs on the premises shall not obstruct the entrance or windows. (3) Address identification shall comply with illuminated address signs requirements. (4) Business identification signage shall be limited to that needed for identification only, consisting of a single window sign or wall sign that shall comply with City Code§3227 and any other City Code provisions regulating signage. (K) Employee Records. Each owner or operator of a Dispensary shall maintain a current register of the names of all volunteers and employees currently working at or employed by the Dispensary, and shall disclose such registration for inspection by any City officer or official for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements of this Section. (L) Patient Records. A Dispensary shall maintain records of all patients and primary caregivers using only the identification card number issued by the county, or its agent, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code§ 11362.71 et seq., as a protection of the confidentiality of the cardholders, or a copy of the written recommendation from a physician stating the need for medical marijuana. Such records may be maintained on or off-site, and shall be made available for inspection by any City officer or official for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements of this Chapter. (M) Staff Training. Dispensary staff shall receive appropriate training for their intended duties to ensure understanding of rules and procedures regarding dispensing in compliance with state and local law, and the Dispensary shall employ properly trained or use professionally-hired security personnel in accordance with the conditions of its permit. (N)Site Management. (1) The operator of the establishment shall take all reasonable steps to discourage and correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance in parking areas, sidewalks, alleys and areas surrounding the premises and adjacent properties during business hours if directly related to the patrons of the subject Dispensary. (a)"Reasonable steps"shall include calling the police in a timely manner; and requesting those engaging in objectionable activities to cease those activities, unless personal safety would be threatened in making the request. (b)"Nuisance" includes, but is not limited to, disturbances of peace, open public consumption of marijuana or alcohol, excessive pedestrian or vehicular traffic, illegal drug activity, harassment of passersby, excessive littering, excessive loitering, illegal parking, excessive loud noises, especially late at night or early in the morning hours, lewd conduct or excessive police detentions and arrests. (2) The operator shall take all reasonable steps to reduce loitering in public areas, sidewalks, alleys and areas surrounding the premises and adjacent properties during business hours. 12 Attachment#3(Redline) (3) The operator shall provide patients with a list of the rules and regulations governing medical marijuana use and consumption within the City and recommendations on sensible marijuana etiquette. (0)Trash, Litter, Graffiti. (1) The operator shall keep the sidewalks adjoining the premises plus 10 feet beyond property lines along the street as well as any parking lots under the control of the operator clear of litter,debris and trash. (2)The operator shall remove all graffiti from the premises and parking lots under the control of the operator within 72 hours of its application. (P) Compliance with Other Requirements. The operator shall comply with all applicable provisions of local, state or federal laws, regulations or orders, as well as any condition imposed on any permits issued pursuant to applicable laws, regulations or orders. (Q) Confidentiality. The information provided for purposes of this Section shall be maintained by the City as confidential information, and shall not be disclosed as public records unless pursuant to subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or otherwise compelled by court order. (R) Display of Permit. Every Dispensary shall display at all times during business hours the permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter for such Dispensary in a conspicuous place so that the same may be readily seen by all persons entering the Dispensary. (S) Reporting and Payment of Fees. Each permittee shall file an annual statement with the Planning Department: (1) indicating the number of patients served by the Dispensary within the previous calendar year, (2) the continuing accuracy of the information in the prior year's Dispensary Use Permit application, (3) documenting any changes or additions to that information as of the date for renewal of the Permit, any citizen complaints, City Code violations, and calls for law enforcement during the prior year, the applicant's compliance with applicable City and State law governing the operation of dispensaries, and (4) including any additional information the Planning Department deems necessary to administer this Chapter, and pay all Comment[DV13]:Designating the Planning annual permit fees. Director here is a drafting error;this language is from the Sebastopol ordinance used as a model for this Ordinance and should have been changed to (T) Alcoholic Beverages. No Dispensary shall hold or maintain a license from the State Planning Department. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the sale of alcoholic beverages, or operate a business on the premises that sells alcoholic beverages. No alcoholic beverages shall be allowed or consumed on the premises. (U) Dispensaries shall comply with the parking requirements for medical office uses. (V) Inspections. During normal business hours, Dispensaries permitted under this Chapter shall provide access for administrative inspections by City officials or officers to verify compliance with this Chapter. Any Dispensary's refusal to comply with this Section shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter. §5709 APPLICATION PREPARATION AND FILING. (A) Application Filing. A complete Dispensary Use Permit application submittal packet shall be submitted in accordance with City Code § 9262, including a detailed written statement 13 Attachment#3(Redline) as to how the proposed Dispensary complies with Sections 5707, 5708 and 5710, and any other information or submissions required by this chapter. All applications for Dispensary Use Permits shall be filed with the Planning Department, using forms provided by the City, and accompanied by the applicable filing fee and any other applicable fees or charges. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide information required for approval of the permit. The application shall be made under penalty of perjury. (B) Eligibility for Filing. Applications may only be filed by the owner of the subject property, or person with a lease signed by the owner or duly authorized agent allowing them to occupy the property for the intended use. If the applicant is a lessee, a copy of the duly executed lease currently in effect must accompany the application. (C) Filing Date. The filing date of any application shall be the date when the City receives the last submission of information or materials required in compliance with the submittal requirements specified herein. (D) Effect of Incomplete Filing. Upon notification that an application submittal is incomplete, the applicant shall submit any additional documents or information required to complete the application within thirty (30) days of the date the applicant is notified in writing by the Planning Department that the application is incomplete. If the applicant fails to complete the application within said thirty (30) days, the application shall be deemed withdrawn and a new application submittal that complies with Section 5709(A) shall be required in order to proceed with the application. (E) Effect of Other Permits or Licenses. The fact that an applicant possesses other types of state or City permits or licenses does not exempt the applicant from the requirement of obtaining a Dispensary Use Permit. (F) Submittal Requirements. Any application for a Dispensary Use Permit shall include the following information. (1) Applicant(s) Name. The full name (including any current or prior aliases, or other legal names the applicant is or has been known by, including maiden names), present address, and telephone number of the applicant; (2) Applicant(s) Mailing Address. The address to which notice of action on the application is to be mailed; (3) Previous Addresses. Previous addresses for the past five years immediately prior to the present address of the applicant; (4)Verification of Age. Written proof that the applicant is over the age of 18 years of age; (5) Physical Description.Applicant's height,weight,color of eyes and hair; (6) Photographs. Passport quality photographs for identification purposes; (7) Employment History.All business, occupation,or employment of the applicant for the five years immediately preceding the date of the application; (8) Tax History. The Dispensary business tax history of the applicant, including whether such person, in previously operating in this or another city, county or state under license has had a business license revoked or suspended, the reason therefor, and the business or activity or occupation in which the applicant engaged subsequent to such action of suspension or revocation; (9) Management Information. The name or names and addresses of the person or persons having the management or supervision of applicant's business; 14 Attachment#3(Redline) (10) Criminal Background. A background investigation verifying whether the person or person having the management or supervision of applicant's business has been convicted of a crime(s), the nature of such offense(s), and the sentence(s) received therefor; (11) Employee Information. Number of employees, volunteers, and other persons who will work at the Dispensary; (12) Plan of Operations.A plan of operations describing how the Dispensary will operate consistent with the intent of State law and the provisions of this Chapter, including but not limited to: (a) Ensuring that the Dispensary will not engage in retail sales of medical marijuana that violate California law or this Chapter. (b) Controls that will assure medical marijuana will be dispensed to qualifying patients or caregivers only. (c) Controls that will ensure limitations on numbers of patients is adhered to. (d) Controls that will ensure access to Dispensary premises is adequately monitored and restricted to pre-approved qualified patients and caregivers. (13)Written Project Description. A written description summarizing the proposed Dispensary use size, number of patients, characteristics and intent; (14) Written Response to Dispensary Standards. The applicant shall provide a comprehensive written response identifying how the Dispensary plan complies with the each of the standards for review in this Chapter, specifically the limitation on number and size, limitation on location, and operating requirements sections; (15)Written Response to Criteria for Review Section. The applicant shall provide a written response indicating the method by which each of the criteria for review has been satisfied; (16) Security Plan. A detailed security plan outlining the proposed security arrangements for insuring the safety of persons and to protect the premises from theft. The plan shall include installation of security cameras, a robbery alarm system monitored by a licensed operator, and a security assessment of the site conducted by a qualified professional; (17) Floor Plan. A sketch or diagram showing the interior configuration of the premises, including a statement of the total floor area occupied by the Dispensary. The sketch or diagram need not be professionally prepared, but must be drawn to a designated scale or drawn with marked dimensions of the interior of the premises to an accuracy of plus or minus six inches; (18) Site Plan. A sketch or diagram showing exterior configuration of the premises, including the outline of all structures, parking and landscape areas, and property boundaries. The sketch or diagram need not be professionally prepared, but must be drawn to a designated scale or drawn with marked dimensions to an accuracy of plus or minus six inches; (19) Accessibility Evaluation. A written evaluation of accessibility to and within the building, and identification of any planned accessibility improvements. (20) Neighborhood Context Map. An accurate straight-line drawing depicting the building and the portion thereof to be occupied by the Dispensary, all properties and uses within 600 feet of the boundaries of the property on which the Dispensary Use Permit is requested, and: (a) the property lines of any School within 600 feet of the property line of the Dispensary for which a permit is requested, (b) the property lines of any Dispensary within 250 feet of the primary entrance of the Dispensary for which a permit is requested, and (c)the property lines of any youth-oriented facility or residential zone or use within 250 feet of the primary entrance of the Dispensary; 15 Attachment#3(Redline) (21) Lighting Plan. A lighting plan showing existing and proposed exterior premises and interior lighting levels that would be the minimum necessary to provide adequate security lighting for the use and comply with all City standards regarding lighting design and installation. All lighting shall be fully hooded and downcast, and shall not shine towards the night sky, adjacent property or any street. (22) City Authorization. Written authorization for the City, its agents and employees to seek verification of the information contained within the application; (23) Statement of Owners Consent. A statement in writing by the applicant that he or she certifies under penalty of perjury that the applicant has the consent of the property owner and landlord to operate a Dispensary at the location; (24) Applicant's Certification. A statement in writing by the applicant that he or she certifies under penalty of perjury that all the information contained in the application is true and correct; (25) Other Information. Such other information as deemed necessary by the Planning Department to demonstrate compliance with this Chapter including all City and Comment[DV14]:Designating the Planning State Codes, including operating requirements established in this Chapter. Director here is a drafting error;this language is from the Sebastopol ordinance used as a model for this Ordinance and should have been changed to (G) Renewal. Applications for one-year renewal shall be accompanied by the following Planning Department. minimum information: 'Comment[DV15]:At its October 3,2016 (1) The operator shall report the number of patients served and pay applicable meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it agreed with fees, as required by this Chapter. the Commission's recommendation to add language (2) The operator shall provide a detailed description of any adjustments and indicating that an applicant fora Dispensary Use Permit must show compliance with State law changes proposed or that have occurred in Dispensary operations to address issues, or permitting and licensing requirements when comply with laws. applying for a Permit.Note that Subsection 5307(B) (3) The operator shall identify any problems encountered during operations and of this Ordinance already states that"it shall be how they have been addressed. unlawful to operate any business or conduct any activity in the City for which a State license is (4)The operator shall identify how the Dispensary has managed its operations to required under the MMRSA without also having a comply with the operating requirements of this Chapter and with State law. valid State license pursuant to the MMRSA"once the California regulatory and licensing requirements §5710 CRITERIA FOR REVIEW. go into effect in 2018. In addition to the findings required in City Code § 9262, the Zoning Administrator shall consider the following criteria in determining whether to grant or deny a Dispensary Use Permit, and renewals of a Dispensary Use Permit: (A) That the Dispensary Use Permit is consistent with the intent of Proposition 215 and related State law, the provisions of this Chapter and the City Code, including the application submittal and operating requirements herein. (B)That the Dispensary location is not identified as having significant crime issues (e.g., based upon crime reporting statistics as maintained by the Police Department). (C) That there have not been significant numbers of calls for police service, crimes or arrests in the area or to an existing Dispensary location. (D)That an applicant or employee is not under 18 years of age. (E)That all required application materials have been provided and/or the Dispensary has operated successfully in a manner that shows it would comply with the operating requirements and standards specified in this Chapter. 16 Attachment#3(Redline) (F) That all required application or annual renewal fees have been paid and reporting requirements have been satisfied in a timely manner. (G) That an appropriate limit on size of the Dispensary has been established and the requested permit would not exceed limitations on number of patients and/or permits allowed by this Chapter. (H)That issuance of a Dispensary Use Permit for the size requested is justified to meet needs of residents. (I) That issuance of the Dispensary Use Permit would serve needs of residents at this location. (J) That the location is not prohibited by the provisions of this Chapter or any local or state law, statute, rule or regulation and no significant nuisance issues or problems are anticipated or have resulted from Dispensary operations. (K)That the site plan,floor plan, and security plan have incorporated features necessary to assist in reducing potential crime-related problems and as specified in the operating requirements section. These features may include, but are not limited to, security on-site; procedure for allowing entry; openness to surveillance and control of the premises; the perimeter, and surrounding properties; reduction of opportunities for congregating and obstructing public ways and neighboring property; illumination of exterior areas; and limiting furnishings and features that encourage loitering and nuisance behavior. (L) That no Dispensary use, owner, permittee, agent, or employee has violated any provision of this Chapter including grounds for suspension, modification or revocation of a permit. (M) That all reasonable measures have been incorporated into the plan and/or consistently taken to successfully control the establishment's patrons' conduct resulting in disturbances, vandalism, crowd control inside or outside the premises, traffic control problems, marijuana use in public, or creation of a public or private nuisance, or interference with the operation of another business. (N) That the Dispensary would not adversely affect the health, peace or safety of persons living or working in the surrounding area, overly burden a specific neighborhood with special needs or high impact uses, or contribute to a public nuisance; or that the Dispensary has resulted in repeated nuisance activities including disturbances of the peace, illegal drug activity, marijuana use in public, harassment of passersby, excessive littering, excessive loitering, illegal parking, excessive loud noises, especially late at night or early in the morning hours, lewd conduct, or police detentions or arrests. (0)That any provision of the City Code or condition imposed by a City issued permit, or any provision of any other local, or State law, regulation, or order, or any condition imposed by permits issued in compliance with those laws has not been violated. (P) That the applicant has not violated any local or State law, statute, rule or regulation respecting the distribution, possession,or consumption of marijuana. 17 Attachment#3(Redline) (Q)That the applicant has not knowingly made a false statement of material fact or has knowingly omitted to state a material fact in the application for a permit. (R) That the applicant, his or her agent or employees, or any person who is exercising managerial authority on behalf of the applicant has not been convicted of a felony, or of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, or has engaged in misconduct related to the qualifications,functions or duties of a permittee. A conviction within the meaning of this Section means a plea or verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere. (S) That the applicant has not engaged in unlawful, fraudulent, unfair, or deceptive business acts or practices. (T) That adequate parking will be provided at a rate of one space for every 300 gross square feet of retail space, office space, and similar floor areas. §5711 INVESTIGATION AND ACTION ON APPLICATION. After the making and filing of a complete application for the Dispensary Use Permit and the payment of the fees, the Police Department shall conduct a background check of the applicant and all employees and other persons determined by the Police Department to perform functions in the Medical Marijuana Dispensary that could influence its compliance with this Chapter and conduct an investigation of the application. In processing the application: (A)The Planning Department shall refer the application to any other City departments as necessary to complete the review of the application. (B) Following provision of complete application materials, inter-departmental review, and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Department shall schedule the Dispensary Use Permit for Zoning Administrator review. In making a decision to grant or deny the application the Zoning Administrator shall follow the notice and hearing procedures and make the findings required by City Code§9262(C)-(F)and shall either grant or deny the application in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. Comment[DV16]:The Planning Commission recommended that it be granted the authority and (C) In approving a Dispensary Use Permit, the Zoning Administrator may impose duty to conduct the hearing and render a decision on a Dispensary Use Permit application. conditions, restrictions or require revisions to the proposal to comply with the purpose and intent of this Chapter. At its October 3,2016 meeting,the ad hoc indicated that it did not agree with this recommendation, preferring instead to use more of an administrative (D) The Planning Department shall cause a written notice of the Zoning Administrator procedure on Dispensary Use Permit applications, decision to issue or deny a permit to be mailed to the applicant by U.S. mail. with a public notice and hearing requirement.As such,the ad hoc believes that the authority and §5712 APPEAL FROM ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DETERMINATION. duty to conduct hearings and make decisions on initial Dispensary Use Permit applications should remain with the Zoning Administrator. (A) An applicant aggrieved by the Zoning Administrator decision to issue or to deny a Dispensary Use Permit may appeal such decision to the Planning Commission by filing an appeal. All determinations of the Zoning Administrator regarding Dispensary Use Permits shall be final unless a written appeal, stating the reasons for the appeal, and the appeal fee, if any, as established by resolution of the City Council from time to time, are filed with the Planning Commission within ten (10)days of the date the decision was made.Appeals may be filed by an applicant or any interested party.An interested party may appeal only if he or she appeared and stated his or her position during the hearing on the decision from which the appeal is taken. 18 Attachment#3(Redline) (B)The Planning Commission shall conduct a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal in accordance to the procedures applicable to an appeal of a decision to grant or deny a use permit as set forth in Division 9, Chapter 2, Article 20 of the City Code.At the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify the appealed decision of the Zoning Administrator. All Planning Commission decisions on appeals of the Zoning Administrator's decision with regard to an application for a Dispensary Use Permit are final for the City. §5713 REVOCATION. (A)Any Dispensary Use Permit issued under the terms of this Chapter may be revoked by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, when it shall appear to the Commission that the use for which the Dispensary Use Permit was granted is not being conducted in compliance with the Dispensary Use Permit as conditioned, the permittee has violated any of the requirements of this Chapter or the Dispensary is operated in a manner that violates the provisions of this Chapter, including the criteria for review and operating requirements sections, or conflicts with State law. (B)The Zoning Administrator shall place the matter of Dispensary Use Permit revocation on the Commission agenda at the direction of the City Attorney. Revocation proceedings shall be conducted in compliance with Section 9262(H) of this Code. Notice of the hearing required by said section shall be given in compliance with Section 9262(C). In addition, notice of the revocation hearing, including a description of the facts and violations relied upon in seeking revocation, shall be served on the permit holder by personal service, overnight courier or registered United States Mail, return receipt requested, not later than ten (10) day prior to the hearing. Service shall be deemed complete when received by the permit holder or forty-eight hours after deposit in the United States Mail, whichever occurs first. Notice shall be sent to the address as shown on the permit application or to an address which the permit holder has requested in writing that the City use for official communications. The address shall not be a Post Office box, but must be a physical address. (C) If any person holding a permit or acting under the authority of such permit under this Chapter is convicted of a public offense in any court for any offense that would constitute a violation of their Dispensary Use Permit or this Ordinance , the Zoning Administrator may revoke such permit forthwith without any further action thereof, other than giving notice of revocation to the permittee. §5714 EFFECT OF REVOCATION. When the Zoning Administrator shall have revoked any permit provided for in this Chapter and the time for appeal to the Planning Commission shall have elapsed, or, if after appeal to the Planning Commission, the decision of the Zoning Administrator has been affirmed by the Commission, no new application for a permit shall be accepted from the applicant and no such permit shall be issued to such person or to any corporation or other business entity, including but not limited to, a partnership or limited liability company, in which he or she shall have any direct or indirect beneficial, financial or ownership interest for a period of three years after the action revoking the permit. §5715 TRANSFER OF PERMITS. 19 Attachment#3(Redline) (A)A permittee shall not operate a Dispensary under the authority of a Dispensary Use Permit at any place other than the address of the Dispensary stated in the application for the permit. (B) A permittee shall not transfer ownership or control of a Dispensary, including by transferring a controlling interest in the permittee, or transfer a Dispensary Use Permit to another person or entity unless and until the transferee obtains its own Dispensary Use Permit. Any other assignment of a Dispensary Use Permit is prohibited. (C) No Dispensary Use Permit may be transferred when the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission have notified the permittee that the permit has been or may be revoked. (D) Any attempt to transfer a Dispensary Use Permit either directly or indirectly in violation of this Section is declared void, and the permit shall be deemed revoked. §5716 TIME LIMIT FOR FILING APPLICATIONS UPON ANNEXATION. Any Dispensary that was legally established in Mendocino County ("County") and which is subsequently annexed into the City must apply for and obtain a Dispensary Use Permit in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter within 90 days from the date the annexation becomes effective. Continued operation of a Dispensary without a permit more than 90 days after annexation shall constitute a violation of this Chapter, unless an extension of the 90 day period is approved by the Zoning Administrator upon the applicant's demonstration of Comment[DV17]:Designating the Planning reasonable grounds to do so. Director here is a drafting error;this language is from the Sebastopol ordinance used as a model for this Ordinance and should have been changed to §5717 MARIJUANA DELIVERY. Zoning Administrator to be consistent with the Permit application provisions of this Ordinance. (A)A permitted Dispensary located in the City may deliver marijuana to qualified patients and caregivers at their residence in the City. Such permissible delivery of marijuana to qualified patients shall be limited to delivery by lawfully-operated, permitted dispensaries located within the jurisdictional limits of the City. Any individual engaging in the activity of delivering medical marijuana from a permitted Dispensary to a qualified patient must have a business license in accordance with Division 2, Chapter 1,Article 3 of the City Code. All other marijuana delivery is a prohibited activity in the City, except where the City is preempted by federal or state law from enacting a prohibition on such activity. (B) In conformity with City Code § 6001 it shall be unlawful for any qualified individual engaging in the activity of delivering medical marijuana from a permitted Dispensary to a qualified patient to be in an intoxicated condition or under the influence of narcotic drugs within the corporate City limits of the City in, on, or about any automobile, motorcycle, motor vehicle, street car, railroad car or other vehicle. §5718 VIOLATIONS. (A) It is unlawful for any person, individual, partnership, co-partnership,firm, association, joint stock company, corporation, limited liability company or combination of the above in whatever form or character to violate any provision or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. 20 Attachment#3(Redline) (B)A violation of this Chapter shall be subject to the enforcement and penalties specified in City Code§5723. §5719 REMEDIES. This Chapter shall be subject to enforcement pursuant to Division 8, Article 22 of this Code. §5720 SEPARATE OFFENSE FOR EACH DAY. Any person who violates any provision of this Chapter shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any such person commits, continues, permits, or causes a violation thereof, and shall be penalized accordingly. §5721 HOLD HARMLESS. As a condition of approval of any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter for medical marijuana cultivation, processing, or distribution, the permittee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Ukiah and its agents, officers, elected officials, and employees for any claims, damages, or injuries brought by a permittee's clients or employees, adjacent or nearby property owners or other third parties due to permitted uses or operations, and for any expense incurred by City as a result of or in defense of any such claim.. §5723 PENALTIES. (A) It shall be unlawful and constitute a misdemeanor for any person to violate the provisions of this Chapter, punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than six (6) months or both. This penalty shall not apply, if prohibited by state law. (B)The penalty provided herein is in addition to any other penalty or remedy available at law or in equity, whether civil or criminal,for any violation of this Chapter or engaging in activity requiring a City license or permit, including, without limitation, a business license or building permit,without first obtaining such permit or license. §5724 JUDICIAL REVIEW. Judicial review of a decision made under this Chapter may be had by filing a petition for a writ of mandate with the superior court in accordance with the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure§ 1094.5. Any such petition shall be filed within 90 days after the day the decision becomes final as provided in California Code of Civil Procedure § 1994.6 which shall be applicable for such actions. SECTION 2 Table 3 in Section 9223.1 of Article 18, Chapter 2 in Division 9 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 21 Attachment#3(Redline) Table 3: Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements 22 Attachment#3(Redline) Use Categories and Specific Uses(1) A Use Allowed by Right AC Use Allowed Accessory to a Principal Use DUP Use Allowed with a Dispensary Use Permit MIUP Use Allowed with a Minor Use Permit MAUP Use Allowed with a Major Use Permit Use GeneralUrban Urban Center DowntownCore AdditionalZoningRequirementsby Prohibited GU UC DC Code Section 23 Attachment#3(Redline) Medical DUP DUP DUP Section 5703, Section 5707 marijuana dispensary SECTION 3 Section 9254 in Article 19, Chapter 2 in Division 9 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: §9254 MARIJUANA CULTIVATION B. Cultivation Of Marijuana: 2. Indoor Cultivation In Residential Zoning Districts: Except as permitted in Chapter 8 in Division 6 of this Code, it is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any parcel within any residential zoning district (R-1, R-2, R-3 and CN districts) in the city of Ukiah to cause or allow such parcel to be used for the cultivation of more than twelve (12) mature and twenty four (24) immature marijuana plants within a fully enclosed and secure structure on the parcel. 3. Indoor Cultivation Of Marijuana Restricted To Qualified Patients And Primary Caregivers: It is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any parcel within the city of Ukiah to cause or allow such parcel to be used for the cultivation of marijuana, unless the person is a qualified patient or primary caregiver, growing the amount of marijuana per qualified patient authorized by Health and Safety Code section 11362.77(a) — (b) and (d) — (f), or a Medical Marijuana Dispensary operating with a valid Dispensary Use Permit, not to exceed the per parcel limit in subsection B2 of this section. Comment[DV18]:Amending Subsection(B)(3) of Section 9254 of the City Code will resolve a SECTION 4. conflict with between the City Code's current cultivation regulations,which allows only qualified patients and primary caregivers to cultivate limited 1. SEVERABILITY. numbers of marijuana plants, and Subsection 5708(H)in this Ordinance,which allows limited cultivation of marijuana plants for medical use by If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, Dispensaries,which are not considered patients or or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or primary caregivers under the MM RSA. unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 24 Attachment#3(Redline) This Ordinance shall be published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ukiah,and shall become effective thirty(30)days after its adoption. Introduced by title only on ,2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Adopted on , 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Steven Scalmanini, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk 25 Attachment#4 ORDINANCE NO. 2016- ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING CHAPTER 8 IN DIVISION 6; TABLE 3 IN SECTION 9223.1 OF ARTICLE 18, CHAPTER 2 IN DIVISION 9; AND SECTION 9254 IN ARTICLE 19, CHAPTER 2 IN DIVISION 9 OF THE UKIAH CITY CODE, ENTITLED "MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES" The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby ordains as follows. SECTION 1 Chapter 8 in Division 6 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: § 5700 FINDINGS AND PURPOSE The City Council adopts the ordinance codified in this Chapter based upon the following findings: (A) In 1970, congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act ("CSA") which, among other things, makes it illegal to import, manufacture, distribute, possess or use marijuana in the United States. (B) In 1996, the voters of the state of California approved Proposition 215, codified at Health and Safety Code §11362.5 et seq. (the "Act"). (C) The Act creates a limited exception from criminal liability for seriously ill persons who are in need of medical marijuana for specified medical purposes and who obtain and use medical marijuana under limited, specified circumstances. (D) On January 1, 2004, SB 420 went into effect. SB 420, codified as Health and Safety Code §§ 11362.7 — 11362.83 and known as the "Medical Marijuana Program" ("MMP") was enacted by the state legislature to clarify the scope of the act and to allow cities and other governing bodies to adopt and enforce rules and regulations consistent with SB 420. (E) After the enactment of the MMP and in response to the MMP's explicit reservation of local authority to regulate medical marijuana cultivation and distribution, the City Council took legislative notice of the fact that California cities and counties that had permitted the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries had experienced serious adverse impacts associated with and resulting from such dispensaries, including an increase in crime, including burglaries, robberies, violence, illegal sales of marijuana use of marijuana by minors and other persons without medical need in the areas immediately surrounding such medical marijuana dispensaries; and malodorous smells, indoor fire hazards, mold, fungus, and pests caused by indoor cultivation at dispensaries. (F) To address these potential adverse impacts, in 2007, the City Council enacted Ordinance 1095, §1 ("Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Ordinance"), which prohibited and declared a public nuisance medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Ukiah. (G) The 2007 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Ordinance also states that the City Council's intention is to prohibit the operation and location of dispensaries in the City "until such 1 Attachment#4 time as their legality is clearly established and a proposal can be developed that would satisfy the city council that the facility could operate without causing [serious adverse impacts]". (H) On October 9, 2015, the Governor signed into law AB 266, AB 243, and SB 643, which together comprise the Medical Marijuana Regulation & Safety Act ("MMRSA"). The MMRSA, which went into effect on January 1, 2016, created a statewide regulatory structure for the medical marijuana industry that also allows local governments to regulate the operation of marijuana businesses within their jurisdiction, pursuant to local ordinances. Specifically, the MMRSA allows the City of Ukiah to issue permits or licenses to operate marijuana businesses or prohibit their operation, to regulate or expressly prohibit the delivery of medical marijuana within its boundaries, and to regulate or expressly prohibit the cultivation of marijuana within its boundaries. Pursuant to the MMRSA, if the City opts not to expressly prohibit or regulate the cultivation, processing, delivery, and/or dispensing of medical marijuana, the State will be the sole licensing authority for these activities in the City. (I) To protect the public health, safety, and welfare, it is the desire of the City Council to modify the City Code consistent with the MMP and the MMRSA, regarding the location and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries, delivery of medical marijuana within the boundaries of the City, and cultivation of medical marijuana within the boundaries of the City. (J) There have been a number of marijuana dispensing-related incidents in California, some including acts of violence committed by persons without a legitimate medical need to use marijuana. (K) The City Council finds that medical marijuana dispensing which exceeds the limitations set forth in these regulations will likely result in an unreasonable risk of crime and other adverse impacts and will likely create offensive odors to persons living nearby. (L) It is the City Council's intention that nothing in this Chapter shall be construed to (1) allow persons to engage in conduct that endangers others or causes a public nuisance; (2) allow the use of marijuana for non-medical purposes; or (3) allow any activity relating to the distribution or consumption of marijuana that is otherwise illegal. (M) Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code § 11362.71 et seq., the State Department of Health through the state's counties, is to be responsible for establishing and maintaining a voluntary medical marijuana identification card program for qualified patients and primary caregivers. (N) Health and Safety Code § 11362.71(b) requires every county health department, or its designee, to implement a procedure to accept and process applications from those seeking to join the identification program in the manner set forth in § 11362.71 et seq. (0) This Chapter is compatible with the general objectives of the general plan, in that a Medical Marijuana Dispensary use will be conditionally permitted in commercial and industrial districts, being similar to other permitted and conditionally permitted uses, such as pharmacies and medical clinics, and in that the use will be subject to strict review and conditions. (P) This Chapter will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or adversely affect the orderly development of property, because the uses permitted under this 2 Attachment#4 Chapter will be subject to careful review, limited in scope and location, and subject to strict operating requirements, avoiding or limiting potential negative effects. (Q) It is the purpose and intent of this Chapter to regulate medical marijuana dispensaries in order to promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of residents and businesses within the City. § 5701 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICABILITY. (A) This Ordinance is not intended to create a positive conflict with the CSA, but rather to implement the MMRSA and related state laws. (B) Nothing in this Ordinance is intended, nor shall it be construed, to exempt any marijuana related activity from any and all applicable local and state construction, electrical, plumbing, land use, or any other building, fire, or land use standards or permitting requirements. (C) Nothing is this Ordinance is intended, nor shall it be construed, to make legal any cultivation, transportation, sale, or other use of marijuana that is otherwise prohibited under California law. (D) All processing and distribution of medical marijuana within city limits shall be subject to the provisions of this Chapter, even if the processing, distribution, or cultivation existed or occurred prior to adoption of this Chapter. (E) Nothing in this Ordinance is intended, nor shall it be construed, to allow or permit any "commercial cannabis activity," as defined in Business and Professions Code Section 19319(j) or any commercial or non-commercial activity involving marijuana use for recreational or other non-medical purposes that is not expressly authorized in the Ukiah City Code. § 5702 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meaning: (A) "Accessory building" shall have the same meaning as set forth in City Code § 9278. (B) "Applicant" means a person who is required to file an application for a permit under this Chapter, including an individual owner, managing partner, officer of a corporation, or any other operator, manager, employee, or agent of a Dispensary. (C) "City" means the City of Ukiah. (D) "Delivery" shall have the same definition as set forth in California Business and Professions Code § 19300.5 and as it may be amended. (E) "Dispensary Use Permit" means a permit required to operate a Medical Marijuana Dispensary within the City and that is issued pursuant to this Chapter. (F) "Drug paraphernalia" or "paraphernalia" shall have the same definition as set forth in City Code § 6071. 3 Attachment#4 (G) "Identification card" shall have the same definition as in California Health and Safety Code § 11362.7, and as it may be amended. (H) "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" or "Dispensary" means a "Dispensary" as defined in California Business and Professions Code § 19300.5, as it now reads or may be amended in the future and includes any association, cooperative, affiliation, or collective of persons where multiple qualified patients and/or primary care givers, are organized to provide education, referral, or network services, and facilitation or assistance in the lawful, retail distribution of medical marijuana. A Medical Marijuana Dispensary shall not include the dispensing of marijuana by primary caregivers to qualified patients in the following locations and uses, as long as the location of such uses are otherwise regulated by this Code or applicable law: a clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, a health care facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illness licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, a residential hospice, or a home health agency licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, as long as any such use complies strictly with applicable law including, but not limited to, Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 et seq., or a qualified patient's or caregiver's place of residence. (I) "On-Site" means an activity or accessory use that is related to the primary use — i.e. lawful, retail distribution of medical marijuana — but is located on the same legal parcel as the primary use. (J) "Permittee" means the person (1) to whom a Dispensary Use Permit is issued and (2) who is identified in California Health and Safety Code § 11362.7, subdivision (c) or (d), or (e) or (f). (K) "Person" means any individual, partnership, co-partnership, firm, association, joint stock company, corporation, limited liability company or combination of the above in whatever form or character. (L) "Person with an identification card" shall have the same definition as set forth in California Health and Safety Code § 11362.7, and as it may be amended. (M) "Physician" means a licensed medical doctors (M.D.) and doctors of osteopathic medicine (D.O.) as defined in the California Business and Professions Code. (N) "Planning Director" means the Planning Director of the City of Ukiah or the authorized representative thereof. (0) "Primary caregiver" shall have the same definition as set forth in California Health and Safety Code § 11362.7, and as it may be amended. (P) "Qualified patient" shall have the same definition as set forth California Health and Safety Code § 11362.7, and as it may be amended. (Q) "School" means an institution of learning for minors, whether public or private, offering a regular course of instruction required by the California Education Code. This definition 4 Attachment#4 includes an elementary school, middle or junior high school, senior high school, or any special institution of education, but it does not include a vocational or professional institution of higher education, including any other college or university. (R) "Use Permit" shall have the same definition as set forth in City Code § 9261 and as it may be amended. (S) "Youth-oriented facility" means a public park, church, museum, library, and licensed daycare facility. (T) "Zoning Administrator" means the Zoning Administrator of the City of Ukiah or the authorized representative thereof. § 5703 DISPENSARY USE PERMIT REQUIRED TO OPERATE. (A) It is unlawful for any person to engage in, conduct or carry on, or to permit to be engaged in, conducted or carried on, in or upon any premises in the City the operation of a Medical Marijuana Dispensary unless the person first obtains and continues to maintain in full force and effect a Dispensary Use Permit from the City as required in this Chapter. (B) After January 1, 2018, or such time when State implementing regulations are in effect for the MMRSA, whichever is earlier, it shall be unlawful to operate any business or conduct any activity in the City for which a State license is required under the MMRSA without also having a valid State license pursuant to the MMRSA. Prior to implementation of the State license program pursuant to MMRSA, any operation of a Dispensary, cultivation of medical marijuana, or delivery of medical marijuana permitted by the City shall be conducted in accordance with this Chapter, the City's Zoning and Land Use Ordinances, and all laws pertaining to the equivalent license classification under the MMRSA. (C) The grant of a Dispensary Use Permit by the City shall not create an entitlement or vested right in the permitee to any permit or license to operate any commercial, non-medical marijuana businesses or conduct any commercial, non-medical marijuana activities within the City. § 5704 TERM OF PERMITS AND RENEWALS REQUIRED. (A) Dispensary Use Permits issued under this Chapter shall expire one year following the date of their issuance which date shall appear on the face of the permit. (B) Dispensary Use Permits may be renewed by the Planning Director for additional one- year periods upon application by the permittee, unless the permit is suspended or revoked in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. (C) Applications for renewal shall be made at least 45 days before the expiration date of the permit and shall be accompanied by the nonrefundable application fee referenced in Section 5706 and all information necessary for the Planning Director to evaluate the renewal request in light of the criteria listed in (E) below. In acting on an application for renewal the Planning Director shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 5711(B), except that all references therein to the Zoning Administrator shall be deemed to refer to the Planning Director. Upon timely application to renew a permit, the permit being renewed shall remain in effect until final action is taken to grant or deny the renewal application. 5 Attachment#4 (D) Applications for renewal made less than 45 days before the expiration date shall be processed in the same manner as a timely renewal application but shall not stay the expiration date of the permit. (E) Renewal applications shall be subject to duly noticed public hearings in accordance to the procedures set forth for minor use permit applications in Section 9262 of Division 9, Chapter 2, Article 20 of the City Code, except that all references therein to the Zoning Administrator shall be deemed to refer to the Planning Director. (F) In determining whether to renew a Dispensary Use Permit, the Planning Director will consider the following non-exclusive criteria, in addition to those criteria set forth in this Chapter at §§ 5709(G) and 5710: 1. Whether the Dispensary operated by the permittee has generated an excessive number of calls for police service compared to similarly situated businesses of the same size as the Dispensary. 2. Whether there have been excessive secondary criminal or public nuisance impacts in the surrounding area or neighborhood, including, but not limited to, disturbances of the peace, illegal drug activity, marijuana use in public, harassment of passersby, littering, loitering, illegal parking, loud noises, or lewd conduct. 3. Whether the Dispensary operated by the permittee has a history of inadequate safeguards or procedures that show it is likely that it will not comply with the operating requirements and standards in this Chapter. 4. Whether the Dispensary has failed to pay fees, penalties, or taxes required by this Code or has failed to comply with the production of records or other reporting requirements of this Chapter. 5. Whether it appears that the permittee has, in its renewal application, provided a false statement of material fact or has knowingly omitted a material fact. 6. Whether the renewal applicant or one or more of its officers, employees, partners, managers or members with management responsibilities ("Managers") has been convicted of a felony, or has engaged in misconduct that is substantially related to the qualifications, functions or duties of a Dispensary operator. A conviction within the meaning of this section means a plea or verdict of guilty, or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere. Notwithstanding the above, an application shall not be denied solely on the basis that the applicant or any Manager has been convicted of a felony, if the person convicted has obtained a certificate of rehabilitation (expungement of felony record) under California law or under a similar federal statute or state law where the expungement was granted. 7. Whether the renewal applicant or Dispensary has previously or is currently engaged in unlawful, fraudulent, unfair, or deceptive business acts or practices. (G) The Planning Director shall make findings of fact and either grant, grant conditionally, or deny the application for renewal of a Dispensary Use Permit. An applicant aggrieved by the Planning Director's decision to issue or to deny a Dispensary Use Permit renewal may appeal such decision to the Planning Commission by filing an appeal. All determinations of the Planning Director regarding Dispensary Use Permit renewals shall be final unless a written appeal, stating the reasons for the appeal, and the appeal fee, if any, as established by resolution of the City Council from time to time, are filed with the Planning 6 Attachment#4 Department within ten (10) days of the date the decision was made. The appeal fee will be in addition to the nonrefundable renewal application fee. Appeals may be filed by an applicant. The Planning Commission shall conduct a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal in accordance to the applicable procedures as set forth in Section 9266 of Division 9, Chapter 2, Article 20 of the City Code, except that all references therein to the City Council shall be deemed to refer to the Planning Commission. At the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify the appealed decision of the Planning Director. All Planning Commission decisions on appeals of the Planning Director's decision with regard to an application for a Dispensary Use Permit renewal are final for the City. § 5705 GENERAL TAX LIABILITY. As a prerequisite to obtaining a permit pursuant to the terms hereof, an operator of a Dispensary shall also be required to apply for and obtain a Business License or exemption from the City of Ukiah and obtain a seller's permit or exemption from the State Board of Equalization pursuant to Division 2, Part 2, Chapter 2, Article 2 of the Cal. Revenue and Taxation Code, commencing with Section 6066e. Dispensary sales shall be subject to sales tax consistent with State law. § 5706 IMPOSITION OF FEES. Every application for a Dispensary Use Permit or renewal shall be accompanied by an application fee, as established by resolution of the City Council from time to time. This application or renewal fee shall not include fingerprinting, photographing, and background check costs and shall be in addition to any other business license fee or permit fee imposed by this Code or other governmental agencies. Fingerprinting, photographing, and background check fees will be as established by resolution adopted by the City Council from time to time. § 5707 LIMITATION ON LOCATION OF DISPENSARIES. (A) A Dispensary may only be located within the Cl, C2, CN, M, and PD (Commercial) zoning districts and in the GU, UC, and DC downtown zoning districts as designated in the General Plan, Zoning Map. (B) A Dispensary shall be in a visible location that provides good views of the Dispensary entrance, windows and premises from a public street. (C) A Dispensary shall not be allowed in the following areas at the time of its permitted establishment: (1) Within 600 feet of a School, with that distance measured as the horizontal distance in a straight line from the property line of the School to the closest property line of the lot on which the Dispensary is to be located without regard to intervening structures; or (2) Within 250 feet of a Youth-oriented facility other than a School, or another Dispensary, with that distance measured by street frontage and not radial distance; or 7 Attachment#4 (3) Abutting, on any side of the parcel upon which the Dispensary is located, a parcel occupied by a Youth-oriented facility, a School, or another Dispensary; or (4) Within any residential zoned parcel or primary land use, or any property with an underlying residential or mobile homes general plan land use designation. (5) On a parcel having a residential unit, or on a parcel directly abutting a residentially-zoned property, unless there are intervening non-residential uses between the Dispensary and the residential unit or the residentially-zoned property that the Zoning Administrator or, on appeal, the Planning Commission determines sufficient to provide an appropriate separation. (D) The distance between a Dispensary and above listed uses shall be made in a straight line, along street frontage, from the boundary line of the property on which the Dispensary is located to the boundary of the property on which the facility, building or structure, or portion of the building or structure, in which the above listed use occurs or is located. (E) A waiver of the provisions in subsection (C) of this Section may be granted if the applicant demonstrates on plans and materials presented for review and the Zoning Administrator or, on appeal, the Planning Commission determines that a physical barrier or similar condition exists which achieves the same purpose and intent as the distance separation requirements established herein. § 5708 OPERATING REQUIREMENTS. Dispensary operations shall be established and managed only in compliance with the following standards: (A) Criminal History. Any applicant, his or her agent or employees, volunteer workers, or any person exercising managerial authority of a Dispensary on behalf of the applicant shall not have been convicted of any of the felony offenses enumerated in Health and Safety Code § 19323(b)(5), or of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, or on probation for a drug offense, or engaged in misconduct related to the qualifications, functions or duties of a permittee. A conviction within the meaning of this Section means a plea or verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere. (B) Minors. (1) It is unlawful for any permittee, operator, or other person in charge of any Dispensary to employ any person who is not at least 18 years of age. (2) Persons under the age of 18 shall not be allowed on the premises of a Dispensary unless they are a qualified patient or a primary caregiver, and they are in the presence of their parent or guardian for the first visit. (3) The entrance to a Dispensary shall be clearly and legibly posted with a notice indicating that persons under the age of 18 are precluded from entering the premises unless they are a qualified patient or a primary caregiver, and they are in the presence of their parent or guardian for the first visit. (4) The burden of proof is on the Dispensary personnel to establish compliance with this subsection (B) by clear and convincing evidence. (D) Dispensary Size and Access. 8 Attachment#4 (1) Dispensary size shall be limited, as deemed appropriate and necessary, to best serve patient needs within the intent of this Chapter and reduce potential adverse impacts that might otherwise occur on surrounding neighborhoods, businesses and demands on City services. (2) A Dispensary shall not be increased in size (i.e., floor area or number of patients)without a prior approval amending the existing Dispensary Use Permit. (3) The entrance into the Dispensary building shall be locked at all times with entry strictly controlled; e.g., a buzz-in electronic/mechanical entry system with a vestibule is highly encouraged. A viewer shall be installed in the door that allows maximum angle of view of the exterior entrance. (4) Dispensary personnel shall monitor site activity, control loitering and site access. (5) Only Dispensary staff, primary caregivers, qualified patients and persons with bona fide purposes for visiting the site shall be permitted at a Dispensary. (6) Potential patients or caregivers shall not visit a Dispensary without first having obtained a valid written recommendation from their physician recommending use of medical marijuana. (7) Only a primary caregiver and qualified patient shall be permitted in the designated dispensing area with Dispensary personnel. All other authorized visitors shall remain in the designated waiting area in the front entrance/lobby. (8) Restrooms shall remain locked and under the control of management. (E) Dispensing Operations. (1) A Dispensary shall dispense medical marijuana to meet monthly medication needs of qualified patients, similar to typical pharmacy operations. The Dispensary shall strongly discourage and avoid daily or weekly visits by patients as a routine practice. The Dispensary may possess no more dried marijuana or plants per qualified patient or caregiver than permitted in strict accordance with California Health and Safety Code § 11362.77 and any other applicable State law, and as amended. (2)A Dispensary shall only dispense to qualified patients or caregivers with: (a) a currently valid physician's approval or recommendation in compliance with the criteria in California Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 et seq. and valid official identification, such as a Department of Motor Vehicles driver's license or State Identification Card, or (b) a currently valid California Medical Marijuana Identification Card or a Patient ID Center Identification Card. (3) For qualified patients or caregivers without a California Medical Marijuana Identification Card or a Patient ID Center Identification Card, prior to dispensing medical marijuana, the Dispensary shall obtain verbal, online, or signed verification from the recommending physician's office personnel that the individual requesting medical marijuana is a qualified patient. (4) A Dispensary shall not have a physician on-site to evaluate patients and provide a recommendation for medical marijuana. (5) Patient records shall be maintained and verified as needed, and at least annually verified with the qualifying patient's medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy unless the patient has provided a California Medical Marijuana Identification Card or a Patient ID Center Identification Card. (6) Information on prior year's operations shall be provided annually, as required in this Chapter. The operator shall adjust the operations as necessary to address issues. (F) Hours of Operation 9 Attachment#4 (1) Hours of Operation are limited to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., seven days a week. (G) Consumption Restrictions. (1) Marijuana shall not be consumed on the premises of the Dispensary. The term "premises" includes the actual building, as well as any accessory structures, parking areas, or other surroundings within 200 feet of the Dispensary's entrance. (2) Dispensary operations shall not result in illegal redistribution of medical marijuana obtained from the Dispensary, or use in any manner that violates local, State or City Codes. (3) No person may consume marijuana, by smoking or vaporization, in any public places. Public places shall include, but are not limited to, city owned parks and/or city sponsored events where designated as nonsmoking areas by resolution of the city council, streets, sidewalks, alleys, highways, public parking lots as defined in City Code § 6000 and as amended, enclosed places and places of employment as defined in City Code §§ 4503 and 4505 and as amended, and any other property owned or leased by the City, or in which the City holds a right-of-way easement, and which is open to members of the general public, except while actively passing through on the way to another destination. Nothing in this Section is intended, nor shall it be construed to be inconsistent with the California Indoor Clean Air Act of 1976, Health and Safety Code § 118875 et seq and as amended. (H) Retail Sales and Cultivation. (1) No cannabis shall be cultivated on the premises of the Dispensary, except in compliance with this Chapter and with City Code §§ 6093 and 9254 and Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 et seq. The space devoted to on-site cultivation at a permitted Dispensary shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the total floor area, but in no case more than five hundred square feet. Cultivation shall be limited to interior areas of buildings. (a) Except for immature nursery stock marijuana plants, marijuana plants grown by the Dispensary shall only be utilized for production of processed marijuana to dispense to patients. (b) A security plan for the growing area shall be submitted to the Ukiah Police Chief for review and approval. Such plan shall include: security alarms and surveillance systems; physical measures to prevent access to the area by anyone other than Dispensary staff; and physical measures to prevent vehicle penetration of the growing area. (c) If required by the Building Official, the cultivation area shall include a one-hour firewall assembly and shall not create excessive humidity or mold conditions. The cultivation area shall have an air treatment system that prevents odors generated from the cultivation of marijuana on the Dispensary property from being detected by any reasonable person of normal sensitivity outside the Dispensary property, as set forth in City Code § 5708(H)(4). The medical marijuana cultivation area shall be in compliance with the current, adopted edition of the California Building Code as regards Natural Ventilation or Mechanical Ventilation. (d) Cultivation facilities are strongly encouraged to utilize the most water- efficient and environmentally-responsible cultivation practices available. The City reserves the right to require annual reports on cultivation facility practices, including but not limited to cultivation mediums and water use methods. 10 Attachment#4 (e) The cultivation use shall comply with applicable storm water, wastewater, and Building Code requirements and any applicable State or Federal law, including the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (2) With the approval of the Zoning Administrator, a Dispensary may conduct or engage in the commercial sale of specific products, goods or services in addition to the provision of medical marijuana and other items permitted by these regulations on terms and conditions consistent with this Chapter and applicable law. (3) Up to 150 square feet may be utilized for display and sales of devices necessary for administering medical marijuana, including but not limited to rolling papers and related materials and devices, pipes, water pipes, and vaporizers. Such devices may only be provided to qualified patients or primary caregivers and only in accordance with Health and Safety Code § 11364.5 and as amended. (4) Retail sales of medical marijuana that violate California law or this Chapter are expressly prohibited. (5) A Dispensary shall meet all the operating criteria for the dispensing of medical marijuana as is required pursuant to California Health and Safety Code § 11362.5 et seq and as amended. (6) The provision of locally-grown and organic marijuana is encouraged. (I) Operating Plans. (1) Floor Plan. A Dispensary shall have a lobby waiting area at the entrance to receive clients, and a separate and secure designated area for dispensing medical marijuana to qualified patients or designated caregivers. The primary entrance shall be located and maintained clear of barriers, landscaping and similar obstructions so that it is clearly visible from public streets, sidewalks or site driveways. (2) Storage. A Dispensary shall have suitable locked storage on premises, identified and approved as a part of the security plan, for after-hours storage of medical marijuana. (3) Minimum Staffing Levels. The premises shall be staffed with at least one person during hours of operation who shall not be responsible for dispensing medical marijuana. (4) Odors Control. The Dispensary shall have an air treatment system that prevents odors generated from the storage and cultivation of marijuana on the Dispensary property from being detected by any reasonable person of normal sensitivity outside the Dispensary property. To achieve this, both the storage and cultivation areas shall be, at minimum, mechanically ventilated with a carbon filter or superior method. (5) Security Plans. A Dispensary shall provide adequate security on the premises, as approved by the Chief of Police and reviewed by the Planning Commission, including lighting and alarms, to insure the safety of persons and to protect the premises from theft. (6) Security Cameras. Security surveillance cameras shall be installed to monitor the main entrance and exterior of the premises to discourage loitering, crime, illegal or nuisance activities. (7) Security Video Retention. Security video shall be maintained for 90 days. (8) Alarm System. Professionally monitored robbery alarm and burglary alarm systems shall be installed and maintained in good working condition. (9) Emergency Contact. A Dispensary shall provide the Chief of Police with the name, e-mail address, phone number and facsimile number of an on-site community relations staff person to whom one can provide notice if there are operating problems associated with the Dispensary. The Dispensary shall make every good faith effort to 11 Attachment#4 encourage neighborhood residents to call this person to try to solve operating problems, if any, before any calls or complaints are made to the City. (J) Signage and Notices. (1) A notice shall be clearly and legibly posted in the Dispensary indicating that smoking, ingesting or consuming marijuana on the premises or in the vicinity of the Dispensary is prohibited. The notice shall be posted in both English and Spanish. (2) Signs on the premises shall not obstruct the entrance or windows. (3) Address identification shall comply with illuminated address signs requirements. (4) Business identification signage shall be limited to that needed for identification only, consisting of a single window sign or wall sign that shall comply with City Code § 3227 and any other City Code provisions regulating signage. (K) Employee Records. Each owner or operator of a Dispensary shall maintain a current register of the names of all volunteers and employees currently working at or employed by the Dispensary, and shall disclose such registration for inspection by any City officer or official for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements of this Section. (L) Patient Records. A Dispensary shall maintain records of all patients and primary caregivers using only the identification card number issued by the county, or its agent, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code § 11362.71 et seq., as a protection of the confidentiality of the cardholders, or a copy of the written recommendation from a physician stating the need for medical marijuana. Such records may be maintained on or off-site, and shall be made available for inspection by any City officer or official for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements of this Chapter. (M) Staff Training. Dispensary staff shall receive appropriate training for their intended duties to ensure understanding of rules and procedures regarding dispensing in compliance with state and local law, and the Dispensary shall employ properly trained or use professionally-hired security personnel in accordance with the conditions of its permit. (N) Site Management. (1) The operator of the establishment shall take all reasonable steps to discourage and correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance in parking areas, sidewalks, alleys and areas surrounding the premises and adjacent properties during business hours if directly related to the patrons of the subject Dispensary. (a) "Reasonable steps" shall include calling the police in a timely manner; and requesting those engaging in objectionable activities to cease those activities, unless personal safety would be threatened in making the request. (b) "Nuisance" includes, but is not limited to, disturbances of peace, open public consumption of marijuana or alcohol, excessive pedestrian or vehicular traffic, illegal drug activity, harassment of passersby, excessive littering, excessive loitering, illegal parking, excessive loud noises, especially late at night or early in the morning hours, lewd conduct or excessive police detentions and arrests. (2) The operator shall take all reasonable steps to reduce loitering in public areas, sidewalks, alleys and areas surrounding the premises and adjacent properties during business hours. 12 Attachment#4 (3) The operator shall provide patients with a list of the rules and regulations governing medical marijuana use and consumption within the City and recommendations on sensible marijuana etiquette. (0) Trash, Litter, Graffiti. (1) The operator shall keep the sidewalks adjoining the premises plus 10 feet beyond property lines along the street as well as any parking lots under the control of the operator clear of litter, debris and trash. (2) The operator shall remove all graffiti from the premises and parking lots under the control of the operator within 72 hours of its application. (P) Compliance with Other Requirements. The operator shall comply with all applicable provisions of local, state or federal laws, regulations or orders, as well as any condition imposed on any permits issued pursuant to applicable laws, regulations or orders. (Q) Confidentiality. The information provided for purposes of this Section shall be maintained by the City as confidential information, and shall not be disclosed as public records unless pursuant to subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or otherwise compelled by court order. (R) Display of Permit. Every Dispensary shall display at all times during business hours the permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter for such Dispensary in a conspicuous place so that the same may be readily seen by all persons entering the Dispensary. (S) Reporting and Payment of Fees. Each permittee shall file an annual statement with the Planning Department: (1) indicating the number of patients served by the Dispensary within the previous calendar year, (2) the continuing accuracy of the information in the prior year's Dispensary Use Permit application, (3) documenting any changes or additions to that information as of the date for renewal of the Permit, any citizen complaints, City Code violations, and calls for law enforcement during the prior year, the applicant's compliance with applicable City and State law governing the operation of dispensaries, and (4) including any additional information the Planning Department deems necessary to administer this Chapter, and pay all annual permit fees. (T) Alcoholic Beverages. No Dispensary shall hold or maintain a license from the State Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the sale of alcoholic beverages, or operate a business on the premises that sells alcoholic beverages. No alcoholic beverages shall be allowed or consumed on the premises. (U) Dispensaries shall comply with the parking requirements for medical office uses. (V) Inspections. During normal business hours, Dispensaries permitted under this Chapter shall provide access for administrative inspections by City officials or officers to verify compliance with this Chapter. Any Dispensary's refusal to comply with this Section shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter. § 5709 APPLICATION PREPARATION AND FILING. (A) Application Filing. A complete Dispensary Use Permit application submittal packet shall be submitted in accordance with City Code § 9262, including a detailed written statement 13 Attachment#4 as to how the proposed Dispensary complies with Sections 5707, 5708 and 5710, and any other information or submissions required by this chapter. All applications for Dispensary Use Permits shall be filed with the Planning Department, using forms provided by the City, and accompanied by the applicable filing fee and any other applicable fees or charges. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide information required for approval of the permit. The application shall be made under penalty of perjury. (B) Eligibility for Filing. Applications may only be filed by the owner of the subject property, or person with a lease signed by the owner or duly authorized agent allowing them to occupy the property for the intended use. If the applicant is a lessee, a copy of the duly executed lease currently in effect must accompany the application. (C) Filing Date. The filing date of any application shall be the date when the City receives the last submission of information or materials required in compliance with the submittal requirements specified herein. (D) Effect of Incomplete Filing. Upon notification that an application submittal is incomplete, the applicant shall submit any additional documents or information required to complete the application within thirty (30) days of the date the applicant is notified in writing by the Planning Department that the application is incomplete. If the applicant fails to complete the application within said thirty (30) days, the application shall be deemed withdrawn and a new application submittal that complies with Section 5709(A) shall be required in order to proceed with the application. (E) Effect of Other Permits or Licenses. The fact that an applicant possesses other types of state or City permits or licenses does not exempt the applicant from the requirement of obtaining a Dispensary Use Permit. (F) Submittal Requirements. Any application for a Dispensary Use Permit shall include the following information. (1) Applicant(s) Name. The full name (including any current or prior aliases, or other legal names the applicant is or has been known by, including maiden names), present address, and telephone number of the applicant; (2) Applicant(s) Mailing Address. The address to which notice of action on the application is to be mailed; (3) Previous Addresses. Previous addresses for the past five years immediately prior to the present address of the applicant; (4) Verification of Age. Written proof that the applicant is over the age of 18 years of age; (5) Physical Description. Applicant's height, weight, color of eyes and hair; (6) Photographs. Passport quality photographs for identification purposes; (7) Employment History. All business, occupation, or employment of the applicant for the five years immediately preceding the date of the application; (8) Tax History. The Dispensary business tax history of the applicant, including whether such person, in previously operating in this or another city, county or state under license has had a business license revoked or suspended, the reason therefor, and the business or activity or occupation in which the applicant engaged subsequent to such action of suspension or revocation; (9) Management Information. The name or names and addresses of the person or persons having the management or supervision of applicant's business; 14 Attachment#4 (10) Criminal Background. A background investigation verifying whether the person or person having the management or supervision of applicant's business has been convicted of a crime(s), the nature of such offense(s), and the sentence(s) received therefor; (11) Employee Information. Number of employees, volunteers, and other persons who will work at the Dispensary; (12) Plan of Operations. A plan of operations describing how the Dispensary will operate consistent with the intent of State law and the provisions of this Chapter, including but not limited to: (a) Ensuring that the Dispensary will not engage in retail sales of medical marijuana that violate California law or this Chapter. (b) Controls that will assure medical marijuana will be dispensed to qualifying patients or caregivers only. (c) Controls that will ensure limitations on numbers of patients is adhered to. (d) Controls that will ensure access to Dispensary premises is adequately monitored and restricted to pre-approved qualified patients and caregivers. (13) Written Project Description. A written description summarizing the proposed Dispensary use size, number of patients, characteristics and intent; (14) Written Response to Dispensary Standards. The applicant shall provide a comprehensive written response identifying how the Dispensary plan complies with the each of the standards for review in this Chapter, specifically the limitation on number and size, limitation on location, and operating requirements sections; (15) Written Response to Criteria for Review Section. The applicant shall provide a written response indicating the method by which each of the criteria for review has been satisfied; (16) Security Plan. A detailed security plan outlining the proposed security arrangements for insuring the safety of persons and to protect the premises from theft. The plan shall include installation of security cameras, a robbery alarm system monitored by a licensed operator, and a security assessment of the site conducted by a qualified professional; (17) Floor Plan. A sketch or diagram showing the interior configuration of the premises, including a statement of the total floor area occupied by the Dispensary. The sketch or diagram need not be professionally prepared, but must be drawn to a designated scale or drawn with marked dimensions of the interior of the premises to an accuracy of plus or minus six inches; (18) Site Plan. A sketch or diagram showing exterior configuration of the premises, including the outline of all structures, parking and landscape areas, and property boundaries. The sketch or diagram need not be professionally prepared, but must be drawn to a designated scale or drawn with marked dimensions to an accuracy of plus or minus six inches; (19) Accessibility Evaluation. A written evaluation of accessibility to and within the building, and identification of any planned accessibility improvements. (20) Neighborhood Context Map. An accurate straight-line drawing depicting the building and the portion thereof to be occupied by the Dispensary, all properties and uses within 600 feet of the boundaries of the property on which the Dispensary Use Permit is requested, and: (a) the property lines of any School within 600 feet of the property line of the Dispensary for which a permit is requested, (b) the property lines of any Dispensary within 250 feet of the primary entrance of the Dispensary for which a permit is requested, and (c) the property lines of any youth-oriented facility or residential zone or use within 250 feet of the primary entrance of the Dispensary; 15 Attachment#4 (21) Lighting Plan. A lighting plan showing existing and proposed exterior premises and interior lighting levels that would be the minimum necessary to provide adequate security lighting for the use and comply with all City standards regarding lighting design and installation. All lighting shall be fully hooded and downcast, and shall not shine towards the night sky, adjacent property or any street. (22) City Authorization. Written authorization for the City, its agents and employees to seek verification of the information contained within the application; (23) Statement of Owners Consent. A statement in writing by the applicant that he or she certifies under penalty of perjury that the applicant has the consent of the property owner and landlord to operate a Dispensary at the location; (24) Applicant's Certification. A statement in writing by the applicant that he or she certifies under penalty of perjury that all the information contained in the application is true and correct; (25) Other Information. Such other information as deemed necessary by the Planning Department to demonstrate compliance with this Chapter including all City and State Codes, including operating requirements established in this Chapter. (G) Renewal. Applications for one-year renewal shall be accompanied by the following minimum information: (1) The operator shall report the number of patients served and pay applicable fees, as required by this Chapter. (2) The operator shall provide a detailed description of any adjustments and changes proposed or that have occurred in Dispensary operations to address issues, or comply with laws. (3) The operator shall identify any problems encountered during operations and how they have been addressed. (4) The operator shall identify how the Dispensary has managed its operations to comply with the operating requirements of this Chapter and with State law. § 5710 CRITERIA FOR REVIEW. In addition to the findings required in City Code § 9262, the Zoning Administrator shall consider the following criteria in determining whether to grant or deny a Dispensary Use Permit, and renewals of a Dispensary Use Permit: (A) That the Dispensary Use Permit is consistent with the intent of Proposition 215 and related State law, the provisions of this Chapter and the City Code, including the application submittal and operating requirements herein. (B) That the Dispensary location is not identified as having significant crime issues (e.g., based upon crime reporting statistics as maintained by the Police Department). (C) That there have not been significant numbers of calls for police service, crimes or arrests in the area or to an existing Dispensary location. (D) That an applicant or employee is not under 18 years of age. (E) That all required application materials have been provided and/or the Dispensary has operated successfully in a manner that shows it would comply with the operating requirements and standards specified in this Chapter. 16 Attachment#4 (F) That all required application or annual renewal fees have been paid and reporting requirements have been satisfied in a timely manner. (G) That an appropriate limit on size of the Dispensary has been established and the requested permit would not exceed limitations on number of patients and/or permits allowed by this Chapter. (H) That issuance of a Dispensary Use Permit for the size requested is justified to meet needs of residents. (I) That issuance of the Dispensary Use Permit would serve needs of residents at this location. (J) That the location is not prohibited by the provisions of this Chapter or any local or state law, statute, rule or regulation and no significant nuisance issues or problems are anticipated or have resulted from Dispensary operations. (K) That the site plan, floor plan, and security plan have incorporated features necessary to assist in reducing potential crime-related problems and as specified in the operating requirements section. These features may include, but are not limited to, security on-site; procedure for allowing entry; openness to surveillance and control of the premises; the perimeter, and surrounding properties; reduction of opportunities for congregating and obstructing public ways and neighboring property; illumination of exterior areas; and limiting furnishings and features that encourage loitering and nuisance behavior. (L) That no Dispensary use, owner, permittee, agent, or employee has violated any provision of this Chapter including grounds for suspension, modification or revocation of a permit. (M) That all reasonable measures have been incorporated into the plan and/or consistently taken to successfully control the establishment's patrons' conduct resulting in disturbances, vandalism, crowd control inside or outside the premises, traffic control problems, marijuana use in public, or creation of a public or private nuisance, or interference with the operation of another business. (N) That the Dispensary would not adversely affect the health, peace or safety of persons living or working in the surrounding area, overly burden a specific neighborhood with special needs or high impact uses, or contribute to a public nuisance; or that the Dispensary has resulted in repeated nuisance activities including disturbances of the peace, illegal drug activity, marijuana use in public, harassment of passersby, excessive littering, excessive loitering, illegal parking, excessive loud noises, especially late at night or early in the morning hours, lewd conduct, or police detentions or arrests. (0) That any provision of the City Code or condition imposed by a City issued permit, or any provision of any other local, or State law, regulation, or order, or any condition imposed by permits issued in compliance with those laws has not been violated. (P) That the applicant has not violated any local or State law, statute, rule or regulation respecting the distribution, possession, or consumption of marijuana. 17 Attachment#4 (Q) That the applicant has not knowingly made a false statement of material fact or has knowingly omitted to state a material fact in the application for a permit. (R) That the applicant, his or her agent or employees, or any person who is exercising managerial authority on behalf of the applicant has not been convicted of a felony, or of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, or has engaged in misconduct related to the qualifications, functions or duties of a permittee. A conviction within the meaning of this Section means a plea or verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere. (S) That the applicant has not engaged in unlawful, fraudulent, unfair, or deceptive business acts or practices. (T) That adequate parking will be provided at a rate of one space for every 300 gross square feet of retail space, office space, and similar floor areas. § 5711 INVESTIGATION AND ACTION ON APPLICATION. After the making and filing of a complete application for the Dispensary Use Permit and the payment of the fees, the Police Department shall conduct a background check of the applicant and all employees and other persons determined by the Police Department to perform functions in the Medical Marijuana Dispensary that could influence its compliance with this Chapter and conduct an investigation of the application. In processing the application: (A) The Planning Department shall refer the application to any other City departments as necessary to complete the review of the application. (B) Following provision of complete application materials, inter-departmental review, and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Department shall schedule the Dispensary Use Permit for Zoning Administrator review. In making a decision to grant or deny the application the Zoning Administrator shall follow the notice and hearing procedures and make the findings required by City Code § 9262(C)-(F) and shall either grant or deny the application in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. (C) In approving a Dispensary Use Permit, the Zoning Administrator may impose conditions, restrictions or require revisions to the proposal to comply with the purpose and intent of this Chapter. (D) The Planning Department shall cause a written notice of the Zoning Administrator decision to issue or deny a permit to be mailed to the applicant by U.S. mail. § 5712 APPEAL FROM ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DETERMINATION. (A) An applicant aggrieved by the Zoning Administrator decision to issue or to deny a Dispensary Use Permit may appeal such decision to the Planning Commission by filing an appeal. All determinations of the Zoning Administrator regarding Dispensary Use Permits shall be final unless a written appeal, stating the reasons for the appeal, and the appeal fee, if any, as established by resolution of the City Council from time to time, are filed with the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the date the decision was made. Appeals may be filed by an applicant or any interested party. An interested party may appeal only if he or she appeared and stated his or her position during the hearing on the decision from which the appeal is taken. 18 Attachment#4 (B) The Planning Commission shall conduct a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal in accordance to the procedures applicable to an appeal of a decision to grant or deny a use permit as set forth in Division 9, Chapter 2, Article 20 of the City Code. At the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify the appealed decision of the Zoning Administrator. All Planning Commission decisions on appeals of the Zoning Administrator's decision with regard to an application for a Dispensary Use Permit are final for the City. § 5713 REVOCATION. (A) Any Dispensary Use Permit issued under the terms of this Chapter may be revoked by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, when it shall appear to the Commission that the use for which the Dispensary Use Permit was granted is not being conducted in compliance with the Dispensary Use Permit as conditioned, the permittee has violated any of the requirements of this Chapter or the Dispensary is operated in a manner that violates the provisions of this Chapter, including the criteria for review and operating requirements sections, or conflicts with State law. (B) The Zoning Administrator shall place the matter of Dispensary Use Permit revocation on the Commission agenda at the direction of the City Attorney. Revocation proceedings shall be conducted in compliance with Section 9262(H) of this Code. Notice of the hearing required by said section shall be given in compliance with Section 9262(C). In addition, notice of the revocation hearing, including a description of the facts and violations relied upon in seeking revocation, shall be served on the permit holder by personal service, overnight courier or registered United States Mail, return receipt requested, not later than ten (10) day prior to the hearing. Service shall be deemed complete when received by the permit holder or forty-eight hours after deposit in the United States Mail, whichever occurs first. Notice shall be sent to the address as shown on the permit application or to an address which the permit holder has requested in writing that the City use for official communications. The address shall not be a Post Office box, but must be a physical address. (C) If any person holding a permit or acting under the authority of such permit under this Chapter is convicted of a public offense in any court for any offense that would constitute a violation of their Dispensary Use Permit or this Ordinance, the Zoning Administrator may revoke such permit forthwith without any further action thereof, other than giving notice of revocation to the permittee. § 5714 EFFECT OF REVOCATION. When the Zoning Administrator shall have revoked any permit provided for in this Chapter and the time for appeal to the Planning Commission shall have elapsed, or, if after appeal to the Planning Commission, the decision of the Zoning Administrator has been affirmed by the Commission, no new application for a permit shall be accepted from the applicant and no such permit shall be issued to such person or to any corporation or other business entity, including but not limited to, a partnership or limited liability company, in which he or she shall have any direct or indirect beneficial, financial or ownership interest for a period of three years after the action revoking the permit. § 5715 TRANSFER OF PERMITS. 19 Attachment#4 (A) A permittee shall not operate a Dispensary under the authority of a Dispensary Use Permit at any place other than the address of the Dispensary stated in the application for the permit. (B) A permittee shall not transfer ownership or control of a Dispensary, including by transferring a controlling interest in the permittee, or transfer a Dispensary Use Permit to another person or entity unless and until the transferee obtains its own Dispensary Use Permit. Any other assignment of a Dispensary Use Permit is prohibited. (C) No Dispensary Use Permit may be transferred when the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission have notified the permittee that the permit has been or may be revoked. (D) Any attempt to transfer a Dispensary Use Permit either directly or indirectly in violation of this Section is declared void, and the permit shall be deemed revoked. § 5716 TIME LIMIT FOR FILING APPLICATIONS UPON ANNEXATION. Any Dispensary that was legally established in Mendocino County ("County") and which is subsequently annexed into the City must apply for and obtain a Dispensary Use Permit in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter within 90 days from the date the annexation becomes effective. Continued operation of a Dispensary without a permit more than 90 days after annexation shall constitute a violation of this Chapter, unless an extension of the 90-day period is approved by the Zoning Administrator upon the applicant's demonstration of reasonable grounds to do so. § 5717 MARIJUANA DELIVERY. (A)A permitted Dispensary located in the City may deliver marijuana to qualified patients and caregivers at their residence in the City. Such permissible delivery of marijuana to qualified patients shall be limited to delivery by lawfully-operated, permitted dispensaries located within the jurisdictional limits of the City. Any individual engaging in the activity of delivering medical marijuana from a permitted Dispensary to a qualified patient must have a business license in accordance with Division 2, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the City Code. All other marijuana delivery is a prohibited activity in the City, except where the City is preempted by federal or state law from enacting a prohibition on such activity. (B) In conformity with City Code § 6001 it shall be unlawful for any qualified individual engaging in the activity of delivering medical marijuana from a permitted Dispensary to a qualified patient to be in an intoxicated condition or under the influence of narcotic drugs within the corporate City limits of the City in, on, or about any automobile, motorcycle, motor vehicle, street car, railroad car or other vehicle. § 5718 VIOLATIONS. (A) It is unlawful for any person, individual, partnership, co-partnership, firm, association, joint stock company, corporation, limited liability company or combination of the above in whatever form or character to violate any provision or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. 20 Attachment#4 (B) A violation of this Chapter shall be subject to the enforcement and penalties specified in City Code §5723. § 5719 REMEDIES. This Chapter shall be subject to enforcement pursuant to Division 8, Article 22 of this Code. § 5720 SEPARATE OFFENSE FOR EACH DAY. Any person who violates any provision of this Chapter shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any such person commits, continues, permits, or causes a violation thereof, and shall be penalized accordingly. § 5721 HOLD HARMLESS. As a condition of approval of any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter for medical marijuana cultivation, processing, or distribution, the permittee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Ukiah and its agents, officers, elected officials, and employees for any claims, damages, or injuries brought by a permittee's clients or employees, adjacent or nearby property owners or other third parties due to permitted uses or operations, and for any expense incurred by City as a result of or in defense of any such claim.. § 5723 PENALTIES. (A) It shall be unlawful and constitute a misdemeanor for any person to violate the provisions of this Chapter, punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than six (6) months or both. This penalty shall not apply, if prohibited by state law. (B) The penalty provided herein is in addition to any other penalty or remedy available at law or in equity, whether civil or criminal, for any violation of this Chapter or engaging in activity requiring a City license or permit, including, without limitation, a business license or building permit, without first obtaining such permit or license. § 5724 JUDICIAL REVIEW. Judicial review of a decision made under this Chapter may be had by filing a petition for a writ of mandate with the superior court in accordance with the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5. Any such petition shall be filed within 90 days after the day the decision becomes final as provided in California Code of Civil Procedure § 1994.6 which shall be applicable for such actions. SECTION 2 21 Attachment#4 Table 3 in Section 9223.1 of Article 18, Chapter 2 in Division 9 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Table 3: Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements 22 Attachment#4 Use GeneralUrban Urban Center DowntownCore Add itionalZoningRequirementsby Categories GU UC DC Code Section and Specific Uses (1) A Use Allowed by Right AC Use Allowed Accessory to a Principal Use DUP Use Allowed with a Dispensary Use Permit MIUP Use Allowed with a Minor Use Permit MAUP Use Allowed with a Major Use Permit Use Prohibited 23 Attachment#4 Use GeneralUrban Urban Center DowntownCore Add itionalZoningRequirementsby Categories GU UC DC Code Section and Specific Uses (1) A Use Allowed by Right AC Use Allowed Accessory to a Principal Use DUP Use Allowed with a Dispensary Use Permit MIUP Use Allowed with a Minor Use Permit MAUP Use Allowed with a Major Use Permit Use Prohibited Medical UP DUP DUP Section 5703, Section 5707 24 Attachment#4 Use GeneralUrban Urban Center DowntownCore Add itionalZoningRequirementsby Categories GU UC DC Code Section and Specific Uses (1) A Use Allowed by Right AC Use Allowed Accessory to a Principal Use DUP Use Allowed with a Dispensary Use Permit MIUP Use Allowed with a Minor Use Permit MAUP Use Allowed with a Major Use Permit Use Prohibited marijuana 25 Attachment#4 Use GeneralUrban Urban Center DowntownCore Add itionalZoningRequirementsby Categories GU UC DC Code Section and Specific Uses (1) A Use Allowed by Right AC Use Allowed Accessory to a Principal Use DUP Use Allowed with a Dispensary Use Permit MIUP Use Allowed with a Minor Use Permit MAUP Use Allowed with a Major Use Permit Use Prohibited dispensary 26 Attachment#4 Use GeneralUrban Urban Center DowntownCore Add itionalZoningRequirementsby Categories GU UC DC Code Section and Specific Uses (1) A Use Allowed by Right AC Use Allowed Accessory to a Principal Use DUP Use Allowed with a Dispensary Use Permit MIUP Use Allowed with a Minor Use Permit MAUP Use Allowed with a Major Use Permit Use Prohibited 27 Attachment#4 SECTION 3 Section 9254 in Article 19, Chapter 2 in Division 9 of the Ukiah City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: §9254 MARIJUANA CULTIVATION B. Cultivation Of Marijuana: 2. Indoor Cultivation In Residential Zoning Districts: Except as permitted in Chapter 8 in Division 6 of this Code, it is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any parcel within any residential zoning district (R-1, R-2, R-3 and CN districts) in the city of Ukiah to cause or allow such parcel to be used for the cultivation of more than twelve (12) mature and twenty four (24) immature marijuana plants within a fully enclosed and secure structure on the parcel. 3. Indoor Cultivation Of Marijuana Restricted To Qualified Patients And Primary Caregivers: It is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any parcel within the city of Ukiah to cause or allow such parcel to be used for the cultivation of marijuana, unless the person is a qualified patient or primary caregiver, growing the amount of marijuana per qualified patient authorized by Health and Safety Code section 11362.77(a) — (b) and (d) — (f), or a Medical Marijuana Dispensary operating with a valid Dispensary Use Permit, not to exceed the per parcel limit in subsection B2 of this section. SECTION 4. 1. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable. 28 Attachment#4 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ukiah, and shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Introduced by title only on , 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Adopted on , 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Steven Scalmanini, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk 29 Attachment#5 250 foot from Youth Oriented Facilities Mapli A .,,,,,,-,0,,,, 00 0 11 00 01 0 1 ,M0 1 0 00 04'0,1011111 11 11. C , f I �b'miL 1 ;, Yfii �ryp 4U 1 11111,711 Iluo NiIf llio yore fi I¢.. Pi 1,11i,1,111110011,1 14114' "'1,11 1 1111111111111111u" I,In IIRi 11111 1111001 1 11 III 14t 11 11:,, , 1 42 00,,IlitkiiIlu 'II II ii v111010 yl ' I of 1041 f 10 i x(11 y�y'�) 0 i0'r r rr° f ri,, „ II 01 �riro� mraiw � r �. 6� 11 1$ to$ e rr. 0 rlmvli' YYII 01 r 11 1 eceived -Agenda Item 11 a fi Presentation,11:1,111,111,16,1111.111111111121,1,11illfil,,iiil IiiI!,i'lbj!ii,1101101'1111A(11;1,11001,11".0014 )1,,i)11,i'%//ft) fj// lift'11111,11"1 11111:'11,11,,,11!,"111 1111,s 11 II!'btii;1111011,1,10,141f,(1/t )111 11161011046111,,,,thk11001114'11 %11 0110 6,104J, , 5 , yi iliirlijil;i4$1,1,,,t11;1111,b':1111111;1110,1111,111'1!,,t1hift,,,Iitt,(od 00,44116F1011.1111,111011,1K4k 41' gii,Y/1/1 00,0111091q1;1111,,,Irtliro.010„jl‘ Owiligoll,1119311006J,Y,S,h,,, c/o orl,1 r 4 1' o , v '1,,,,iligotif/illoteo,p.,11,,!#5,,,4/ if Odd o ifhirj ? dimimi ye/ 12)' 441,1011'0i Wit 'goo ,11111111 11111 (4 ( Ing ( 1L,/d / j„))1i ///;/' (//ff'86/ / vhh H rf111,10e1 ' // 111,111 ( 11 ( 11:1144 1110,1, I,cr 1,J.,,,,40/,7,freli f (7,1 , y I IP9 h '11,140;i4114,NO,v'I'VOff'/(6411 „;,„,j1I0,f1Crriii11100 (1 )7/ ',4:10,1100100,0, ,111,0111,10100q, 4.1,§1,11r,INIIitilld' 11'1, fjP/7') hompli4;1114, '9/1/1/#2./1/7/7 111,,,J, , p„ 111111,1147401, r „ '/ 111,1; 111,11111')';41; ,0&) ,,,10!1[1.1,11f11 (4'71 111 , t)/6//11 e'11111,11,,111:11'it 1111 rti I, 11 d'1/. 1:11''''F lid 1'1;1'11 IF:41 /1/1/11/ditil., I 4, 7 0)of Ukiah 1 of 14 Ai 1,,i1 Ih(itl 0 ufli,1141 i'l 0 llif F"' 0)1 q I 011410'dqi;i:ivilig$1111011119191( d ill 141,1010f 1,411 4111,roll,,,,100„1,,,10 fr„4,ly pir r,/7 / '1114,1)1011PII,411111i;,',1,1,11',;jr,11011111/01011 litti, /,op 911,,,,1114016,01,,,roir.11'.41' li kin'1111.)fY Y 0.ry 1111„35,11,1,,,c,101,i.(111,,f(1,11114,/rAP,p,ffilirl, I L,ft i'7p7,, i''7 ( ) i / A 'Ilh'',11,1,,11),1,,11,1111',,,y,A1 jb!l'i,,,'IrifIlii)14,04111,r4,4j4/44 4 4i, , ,011[401,0111,11[,,peop'p,l'o '1I4 lic,1 ,Jf if'f 110,,illq,01'ilo,IC%,,I'll'irVIA,/,'50111?9 w v)Y viliviAlf„IJ Ay,,il'o dw,ph)//(#7/.A/,1 :4111'4,11,1'11,4111"(nq'''hif.V kV A0 '191,111ki c111,0 hrJ1,01100','Jh 1/0 000?°, round IIIIIii Bac kg ,hilin 11,EN,rhth',60 i,"1'"0./ Jf IA Key Components Planning C ommission comments and Ill r,11",,:f1hJ1q 0`?,q; 0 1110 recommendations 11.14:',,'''Illqr'',l''rerg ,taoliiiii////1'ft'/lb Discussion t e M S 41,1h1.011111i,10 lee,,iff://4 ii;; ;; 111116',;11;,11011'", (veii4(i/r/2/7 /II; D me Reco m ndation t ) ,/, , , Ili dir li!I 1 1 Ji 11 i'm lfiiii 0 00 I) i 7 Ji libill,11P1 1 F,11,11111111,)1 011/4)}!////01t!1:1;11/0/f/1 If?liq fifiiii aA i liPpilil ikWiiiiIII'111111111y)/ i 01)1i 67/(0))//4///./S)/i//1(J((f) VA I / f / / / 2 of 14 '114111,111114111151111111111,11111111fillitill1)f14;1;i'::girc,frir;d1110;,;?';1:,Fil;°Cr'IA0'fli:/c/0//1' A 1101AIIV,4191011,14111;01101,00,74 f.4 4'4, It IA,;, likidIONii:141441,40N.M1,1144,i,,,,,,po 1/ ;,/of,,,`,,/,,A 1010,4,101,00111f1,00,141VAPIbilil'I')If'1'I/ ,',OP'P )1e41k1404004gollilikampO,'1,,,i 4, ,1,jo,e0d, 1100111i11004061A44111'4,11 tql:`,116 i ilf ft 4 4 A,JP 4411110011111111 tr it 1411011/41 i i 1,",ii i.A.(1 ',0 "J'.% ,, '' '11'1,,i,411'41,1101001'ilminif,jfirOdteigt,ie 140//0," ",K,:',',1i ( ' j ',,, 1,) k., VIRMirStkifIANINMINC19' lOttrIl I, ''.1,01,410004;0114,110t1',41,fg, ,`7,Old 4 I '45401 Tillillieil'A'1;,0[111;00114.4(IV'''1,"IA'? 101,,,01 oviipic,41,0,114,,,,',,,M#11611",ib);1 , ,,,4 „ /„,,, 04 /„/,,,hi Iii..400,4000,Ningplom;i f',1,4m, 1, , ,,,,,o,f/if 7gicodoroill,,,i11.4.;„!,,,i,q.04/04A0 / i tillr#141:11014:',VVilfl'i/e1p,''CA 1 (10,110.,a141,,,,,,i,,11:11401000,,I,,pe*if,4,, i a 4 A ,,A,,,11,061,,,A,0,04,14 II AAer f IAA A it i 1 ft r , 42"'''',V1SP '(ApAlifficlA/ 4 ( , 1 21„,111g1,„ g 1 ,1,11 . 91(if I mliii6;y4;fii#1/ rtiolooJky:4))v,,, if 1.),»12414i,i40,,,),,,,tf,() , r:// 1 r,,,2„, „,) fridoioyiii,), ),0) j go,§0,,IJJ;,,,Tiy't9i 4 ' iiia ,ff 60 4 1 bio i 04,4 4 4441 ) 1,„,,,,4 „„,, D,,4,,,,,,i' ,., , , _ 4,4,4 , 41,A,14,, .4„,i,;',,?,1q,I,JC,' A pl))1,1ApAp A ii,jj f ,11,, z 1 ,, Orr;X110 ''' ''hll.lir ' ,,, , lig/ r# 0 I ,,g P,,IAAJJ fth,rfA, 4 , p ,,,„ ,„,4 1/d/A , 7/ elN, q 'Knyii1/1/, ( // /ffMtNit fl / .00001111,11,',,,Ai/, /0 , ,,,,i tit/ 0 .,' / / ) d„-, P,c,o4d,ifiii 0.11;11i,011'114101",itgitir ,lig 1,111,0 11,44 teiy lif7 '//i /// 1 Ilf,,,Illial IJI Ilill.t1110101) //),ii.//),VA/% /7/,'' oe ,,1„0111,41110,1,11,111,1414t It /fit 1 / 'III 0144 0411101041101,1 0,4..L., ,,,,,(" //4 jit 9,i 0:f,dt,Oitliekli I ."4 4?74/4.411 fl„,,vid411i1 ill'Ill il 1 iii Ili)1 I{I 1 Ill,111i '747fr '47 4 Ali140,1114111q14101414 101j(116(ifii6ii(41;1410 3 of 14 f,, �IA 1y f �l/f/ "1'11'1'111'1110"161111;r1111111,11111141 ,1(1/1/ Ur 41, ��l/1/ Medical Mari•'uana Regulation Safet Act "MMRSA" 2016 J/'''pi /in�r f�J/ f rf, Created a statewide regulatory structure for the medical l/ marijuana industry ,�f�!i (:// lr , f Allows local overnments to regulate the operation of marijuana ' '°�f��'''' businesses044 11110g ' l/f814 ff f f"f///f Allows the City of Ukiah to issue permits or licenses to operate �f �l /�� marijuana businesses or prohibit their operation entirely ,„,/,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,�� , ,, � /m �)f/ if/Pf f il��ia �!, / ��� fife/f� iii11101,141,,,tilid11)./y/,,,,,,,, 0 '1'11111' 1 I �f0///,,f,/,,,,,, ,,, // / ffr J, v%!%rf PIkI& I a rr',1 ,11,81 1rf1 4 of 14 ,,,,,,,,e,,,lit If illi‘i fi4 ,'y% t f � 1 � //I1 NIT1,1011,,IP41,;YillAf,1„,111il M4Illighi,1 iv I'il Oirgis my/i/ ,ry 11f Or f f;r' ) rj/ ad ff,4) Ad- Hoc Formed 7/ 1 / 1 5411(411(04'1rp4 li %d/1!-;r rl , , � � �y/��jai�1 a To address any regulatory gaps in the City s current regulation °��r ; fi/%//ltD Consider the City s policy objectives with regard to the s � fo d ji rl # 11 medical marijuana industry, Council Member Mulheren �1 {� ���a d irr' r�/17f f Ili RN?? ild Vice Mayor Brownff/ (f �j, City Manager Sangiacomo tiiii,ifil,,y) , 451 411154 ii rri � i A ��: iiiiij �City Attorneys RapportandVaughn / r'fr/� t%ii: Planning DirectorStump s ,� ��% �)'ii� Police Chief Dewe IIII/! ( �I� r Y gift)1 i,l/ adm„tyl ,d ltlla rriiiiii Iii ir,r1 i it nllir c1i 1 illi, I, 5 of 14 "i'm.0,01,011,,i1Mt;t1,11,1,11,i'lli 1,,,,,f,cf,,,,,,10,11111,1111,,,,:05011111itil'ff,1,114,11i i'5,f,./10A 1,'„,),,'114,4411p441N,414404111;/11N1(P1'i1( 1 v 1(ri It/410i011644441e1P 141111'011 tel1A11,1101 IJi/icA liIrcoh,,,pi,64,,!4:;111',0111,11,11,0;1,4114 0 iiii,,!/, ),c / y , , , , / , v,,j,,p. 1 ( ) IA ) ( ) , 0 i , , , , .10,,mbil;,Ailhapsdlic,10011=,N,I41/111,.011 /7/iey4, oi!ii h/(ki 1111,31110010111111017'11411i, 1(1 1 f)",II 6 4411110,111,4k14111411111114410''fC° iiii,/,( 411111,10,11,7.141P0k111111,1',14;1141104 ii 1;11k//e1A,1:111141q1110,,ii,1A'Xii :141,/)/,014 01 Creates Dispensary Use Permit ,, ,, ,;(,),4 'ornolumtio,'1011!0 1 Jii„ , , 0)xp//w Ilhir,:01#1110),,koile 1 o//v 0111 Application Preparation and Filing- information about the applicant and 4,'pg''141'1 4,0111,101V )//li J, employees, background, plans of operation, floor and site plan, security pian :1;;001111,54:„Opt, ,444/0/(0211, litir 114,11q1,1111,1 i j4i'f7/4, 4 0111 Zoning Administrator hearing process .1" ,1? kviii tiniOilikli ,', 4Alif ill / . . '1140114H w file/i2 /,), ,610110,4,,,,t,ii,,,„ (liAlliA, flio 00 Appeals- heard by Planning Commission, final decision maker , ,),ohorri 4,cry7t4 1 cljipp c, Itii,riliqpogsem4 fl 4,,p ff 7/ i 1 4011,1'1,,1,1141140;fiT'llotill it7/711 II 014111,441041,161r4 r;c ,r/117/i ( /11 01" Use Permit Renewal- Planning Director, annually, using extensive, ' r rigorous criteria, public hearing /11,,Jrphr, i ' I”10,110 f, Ifi1DI 41111 dr frfilh rf/my , li 1,11041 di, (4 I,1"4 r((.( ,1 0 I 0 Ottlirl Ill' 411 , / r ,10,11,P1:11AINI'llIlitildiq"111111P1)014c1i111/1/11f/A /14 Aii:ik 1 4 1016' Oh i,h frti°,10, i Pa 41)i fl// beagl r / 6 of 14 voi0 :TJM11,1,41,/,041'1"iii f ,4,(1, .1 411,,,,A I,'„,,,110,1 Yol All,,1111,h,,,tm Eil O 04:4 , 1'1,14,J11,'''',11444111frr,[11111rA'111/''rrill1';.P) I,,,=„d,4,dlidd,',44d44'4dp 40444 4 vid,ikd d 4 d' / ,4 7 y 1 (/) j ! 4;11441/611110P4 Mt Ik',,,liciiiiiii g it46/A , ,,MPONIIII044101,1 Limits on location- Allowed in Commercial 1 (Cl) Commercial 2 (C2), ,111,0,ApAllil!,,f,,,',"'70,',„1h1,44 Neighborhood Commercial (CN), Manufacturing (M), Planned Development (PD)(Commercial) General Urban (GU), Urban Center (UC), and Downtown Core (DC). ,J, 600 feet from school iii 250 feet from youth-oriented facility m Operating Requirements- No felony convictions, employees 18 and older, controlled access, medical card or prescription required for entry, no on- / site consumption, cultivation space limited to (500 sq.ft.) jlp;,0hAll j ' A pi I(IP: ,v4110101' 'hill"I'l /7/ r g',111°00p14111?r,On/if'lii,1//111 ii, Delivery- will be allowed from dispensaries in Town. 1111 JI1i,1,1111,fiVol 2 ,1/91/O/i///) , , 41111,11Iiiiiehltjleo/ ',/iii,777,,O71) ) 04.1010, 11,0),1t1,,,I;Alif/iiA,11,Pi'fri/r/j/ ,,ropolimpiloolo,fr, [;„ O/Of ,/i) 1111‘1„1100401,10,0,111i , // /f 7 of 14 1 1 i A u„0 14,046111w•ril•pwfl,0 (01 '',I fl Mr i 14 cIllr? 0,1,,„m,111,0!, 111)))* ? , ) L 0 ( ? / '',// ) ( ( )1// I h ( ) / / '' ilh // /th ( ( / ' `'/ ' ) / ' / / ' ? 0 0 ' / / ,A 0•11,110,14i111,1141'4111;`;'100,V191 fig vt+, (7 P 'r,,411.41,,,:ji,NP11,411411k,ill'rfwi4 4'4if,' ,i) 1,,,/y//i, 01.110,•my gip41•41v/d1,11,,'4'fill"),/ 0 044400,[kfl r 1.,1411/10,0•f 1 vi 1) ?? • 14411'10.0POP`'?A l'I,,1 i'1011M4 1 IT , A JOY ? Comments and Recommendations 9/14/16: Ad-Hoc Response )11111 nAkir4111111,0,15,1,10'. 44kii it99,2;#09 ,119/,',6±11,h9q,,,,e9i,ii,„c,111$11999'10,04 I Fees for processing: Full cost recovery has been included '1',,I,Alv,11111111`,11,h:'114',,,, Alos,1/4/,/w.0'i q1:1111,r,,ril,l'El,„„[,;Arl,,,,,14911,62k,if i(f , Conflict with Downtown Zoning Code: Conflict with DZC will be amended ie0\11;4/4'A o7, ,'f Irliii/,`,, r 0 or,4 1,•IN, qf/4' (1' Increase distance to 500 feet youth oriented facility: Remains at 250 feet tr,101,41,ii,IIN•Ttloilr iff77,?? ?I ,,10,••[,,of?,6,,11 , olo y//?/0 f /I No on-site consumption: Ordinance was amended ,/ed 'AA , ,„ ,idi,/ff,ip* Square footage devoted to cultivation: Reduced from 1,500 to 500 sq.ft. olk,1,,,,,![PI:,,,,,,j,Tve ,„,,,,, ir 'i:111r 10(jr4'1r",Il '%/lipp/11/‘,/ Am:001;0'1 w fill) 4,J, ( Square footage devoted to retail: Reduced to 150 sq.ft. IIIIIJI:01'101r I,j r9(1/117/ / No limits on what a dispensary can pay for product: Provision removed , (1 Record keeping enforcement: Annual Inspection by Code Enforcement Statement of need: Provision removed 4,441,4,114vaito 1 it ,ill //i in Planning Commission approval: Remains a Zoning',Administrator level decision ii h1Jm,17111001/k)//p/i y tp 7 ig111111101,,11,t,:1441' /1111# I I il ,/ d,b111,,WIA''111'1',i,''1"'k,11 lit 1/g 1 hir111//1 I I/ ' ii Effect of denial: Provision amended allowing applicants the right to reapply qfplii141041,11111k,?..4, 1 12, /Jill 4/117, II 2 IHIII,i10000111.11111401"'i )1 l'f''';'f 91'7/(12Y 6 / /p gil 11 4 ji,I 1 li l'00,4 I, „,/ 11111;ik61101,1116141,14'#Ift//fip i , 11,11,1 0,1,11141'i'tirlf1114*111)V rrl(( '''ffli f1/7/1 11 t11,11 i'l.1,11 1,11111$,I'lliqtfili fil el ft/0116 t //0 1110 1 11 1•11111 Ill'i 11 11144`'hl a i il liThraf 6(tge,fi 8 of 14 'IMv/ 1 0151.1;;Aolo)411114:{0,1141,0 gp,o0i, ill)Wevoi ) 0 ( / / ) o, " i h ( ( / ' /) ( ( QM ( ()I V I ) 0 0 / ''-'1;11E'l Ili 11 li 11 1 11 Iliill 1,ti,',Iiiii 3 illi,"il 1 f,i(1‘,JIJ r III,i,,ili Ill Ill..?('jr A//700 015j'1'1 1 ilqPil r',411111":1 Ill Ii Per 1 1° f 401%15 0.,4 11$1010"10 IP ' Itjjil 411101170 IV,il 11,11PAtill lit"/(Ai 1 00 iii 11 ii1409191 IN 0 g IMP . 1041 00;1411111A1011 I i,1 1'1i it „y Comments, Recommendations 9/28/16 Ad-Hoc Response I Add museums and libraries to youth oriented facility: Definition amended 1141'00,1,41Y1'1',011%;111,1,11,1/ //ool) Increase distance to 500 feet youth oriented facility: Remains at 250 feet* "perJ',"11rimei,,,illirooll[1,(;Alil V,7 A ko41„,,4`;11 Tory,,0,4,1„,Wrol4 Hours of operation: Hours of operation added* '1110,100'h IIMIgIV filifi At+I d Right to operate recreational vs. medical: Language added to address concern 11,14e,',1,11g,',110' '14070i Fire Code: Language added to address concern ( Zoning Administrator approval: Remains a Zoning',Administrator level decision* / Public notice for renewal: Language added to require public notice for renewals 41141i1111;i, (1111.1illri Limit on number of dispensaries: No limit set on the number of dispensaries ,/, ,40811Iliillyi;PI y ifilif/6:1/1 I State licenses required: Language already in Ordinance Section 5/03 Iiiilpi1111101110,01ityi [ ('tit, fif / 111„,i,i,NtIvilliii.mr:1,01//0,mild A / ,11,00,0001,prl„i 0 ljp, , ,pil,,, !I;)1,.Il ///,,,,p .Ad-Hoc Requesting full Council Discussion li11101;1111;10( iMliili/11 00,11110'Ill'Ill'iloilijiiii1411111'11',1'11:1'7,r/11i/firliff3it'l/h4/11/41/iinflikA 9 of 14 lull k ler,lril'iliOilVil VA10101k/Iji,i/ii/1 , ,ki A' I 1 0 1 flowo,'10001,;,1,filidifog y,i,iitilfr,,i(41 t AP 0/Pert ( po 1,0 1111,1,40k,11 1 V11411 111,111 1 11111,41//4,10 0 1 ,4yrre 10 10110,40 ihR41000,114:4111,01i;?0 ''„P 11 ,.14 WO ) H( Y Y Ill ( ) IA /7 1,1' E 'll tJh,I,r,1„1,1,11111411,1",k j 1 i ri/ if 1 11111111tillsrill 411 11V1k111111,11111',11,10,Iii e (!, r r(( Olibillild'Oillifirig,00(10111110[',401 "dir 11 )94 kr 4 111110011,;0,010000000f0h 01,10011#tiy/11 1'il i 4 /ref Jki,E 7,00 111711111411,1114,,,1,11111(11111,i,11, s(1/41 e fie piq 0§11,;,,,ii,l',111,11011,,,phif,,,fig phi 111,1 /,,,fi 6, 14,1111,,1 ,,11, tdi,,K.(4 ,0 411 tlii,,I,.lof,,,,I,,,I,,,,4 ir,,l,I,1, ii ,0 7 5707 Limitation on Location of Dispensary ',11 IP 1'0',i e,11,t.Roil 1011er,,/id„4 ley l,ir IlhA'eil 41ind I re lel i'40 irpy,eityre 100000,00r11,,0,f roe,p,1/rr 4 " ),,,,111),,,11 1011"10 111'1111111 1 lii1 1' /f., 1, 1/, mIlliptip,,,,111:,11111111Ne0111/1101V,A, V 0,i/A iihi,i111,11,i,1,111,,, I,!,711111/';,11,1111111,,',,i1,11111i,r,?ilitt ljfr//,//d)e/i4/1 ''11110%tt 0,PDHAA44111 1141, //),/) /I/I '6'41,0'11',,IlriAlull;',11.,70411,',#14, i r/b),10,, Schools: State Law- 600 foot minimum 7 A/A .i)f//7,::;//::(1:1:/:(1i/1,;;:f):itf/4 )41'11/74.4 ,o,0111,,,,Ehl,foroppvii•/7?yi Youth Oriented Facility- public park, church, museum, library, licensed day care: 10,1,' iqr'ill,1 rim ou y,iry'g Planning Commission: 500 feet i,l,„flio9f,f1,14,,,16 vi'pr if) Ad Hoc: 250 feet 100141 '1,1,'1 6 1111(liA 11 II '644NIAWN, q')11)17 yd Planninq Commission: recommends 500 feet from Youth Oriented Facility "r014114111,if '94/0!//911f 9/, 17 '9i il Iii 111,04,111,,,,001 (7 ) ?ii, 9, 111,1,,,11+,,411111„,1111:011,,,'ir Jilt',/II/V/7 if i Ad Hoc- 500 foot distance limitation unnecessarily limited possible locations of i '111,1er11111410)01,41,e , 1111,, II / , pt4tir,titilil 11171, ,?,, I. dispensaries 1,1? ft,l'Fil 'iIMP119' rr/ li 11 IN 1 IN 1111111 ' Vulill'jf I )jiVt/07,214/ Ilf/iiii ///V, gg4101 lif dlloilili 14111'II 011' .(ef y 8/10 i Ill 11/4 4 7// dial d d 1 li VI i,1.,11'1 4111'1,i 11 VI ir.)1,?Igi'////liffr,/)1111441/An 10 of 14 14,11fiiiip i'Al,.i:iiri4f1.4•4;a1,1,'"'7,if'," ,...10Mii#1010110111h'1,11,,,1 ,,,,I,,i,,A l'4 j ig ,I) ,Off, CI V,',fki,'11V,' ,,,V01 P 41 rifliel'd ',t,0)11 .,.. Ir � Ff�/iii"; C M1,u /f G�f rk %fy� 1 L)we4 ,,:� r flY o I, 11 std j 4 oil Ib b,7 ff/l'% 250 ,rf/tri �,tl,e/ Feet 500 f f''t �' Feet y��� fry f�,,�� E _ ' ' PO, 1,01111dbi'ii';;;;',,:y,(//If 0 ?a C7m� f1rt r,� Yh:J� !�E i, -r; � �V��� A � Aff <a r rJ���(/ l} Y YY 6d .(5r .. :11�" y r � � �/IIS r -0 '' '(jj/Pi 411� I r //: Legend LEGEND q rw �� i. i POTENTIAL! ':MVOn ^ PaaeaCl Lays +' t rr ri ://4//*/, 11 of 14 "II yeA11,1#1411;;NNI(4,10 pliri 0 klgik,,i,ri li,1 )1 1f4,,At///di ,,,11011t:',11:1q:i,:PI,##111(1,11640,lip fli,If/°f qn /? i,,I I 7 / ( ( ( ( , 0 0 (/) ,/ i i . ,$$$ 11$1,11041N4,1441444,44,44; 'f if' /44 . Review Section Zoning Administrator 111414 Criteria for (b) PC 44 47 4 ,, 1)))'IP / / i ,))))IIII, I.)1 ))011 li'l{'e I i// I N',4 0'1,0,1'1019",' ',1 11 t)if I / I 01' 1 /' ''I' ' n- Use Permits o Commission Iiiiii Planning C ' should approved f,& . . by the Planning k, ,,, ..P.,),.10 I / /I. , Commission o Zoning ,,,,,,,„,,, ,,,,,,,,,K , /,p v ' lly noticed, 0114441 ;#10/71i 10 Ad Hoc- Very pre . was Administrator prescriptive, appropriate. , publica 9 „11111,(Ityl 1 ,Ye0 1 1,110101111;hi ieq, I,. ,#I,f ktlf 4104441044 4//4/ 1;11111,114,4;114;44Prfl,Ok4//:///r401/// ) fiiiiiLiotio/olti,144101,1IfIliII/44//)/////4/)//yv4/ I 04 14;44‘40440 o.;4 / 4 4 , 11,, ,I 1,,,11 $ / r / lifkibl,i'll'iii'11111110,i14,11,1t°,,`1,111,,If,,, / ,4vv ),/,';/4/2; ,i 7 / ,r1 Ill'ill 11141/1141111101411"01 IP l'1(40////1'/*//i6/141 i f 1,0 I a, Iiiiiploill111111111.1„dii fifiJ , e,///127(y/2 2/f4,2,' ;7 p/ ,4 , 12 of 14 / / ' w„Ile/ .„w ,,kill,,#,IONI, , I,'),Ay II W[,11,1,[ dill°,II,I,[ii,111,,1 ,f , , I I[in"I[',II [[II 5 ,I',' 'I I' l'1 I,[11[4,0 q p , / ) 1,0 Rh II,o[,) 11,'[ol,11,,,,,),11;' il 1,4iii,,,,,,,?,, , , 1 ,,,, „il„,,„1,0Piil,,I Or,011,1/l'N'll r 0,IHib,[1,1,4 4 1 I'?k1 1 1;411,111)11;111,,t,,,,,I 4i1011,111011)bl;4,,10/11,Ill i 1 ,lf,.ilh,,f 1,,ti,yoOlii1 141„Chwhili(w Itit40,w44WW IN',411 IOW 441 ,fwg 4 , , i/,//w loll,4,:1,44 jpal:1,41,11,1,111,1,1,111,11,1,14,i 1,0,,,,,,,,,plii4q 1101,, ,re I,/,./(If d;1'"11,d'jh,li II,1,10,'I),IIII'fl'ill,rI In9f1 1 4 IN,i 0,yh k ,,I,,,[1 11 l'il III4IIIIIIJ III [1[Yj[III I„,,,„up, Id f/lif i 41,lb 1/P,II,Vir,III?Ijill[VII II'I I I/1''hIP Ok[f 1/ /4V 1 I A ( ) // Il ' 7 ' 'IlliiIIIII,ATIIIIII't:1 'I'IrI AO I''II t I I)/Ir74/77 if 7 ' 'of, / ) 11 / I 111,111,1[1,,,IIIIIII 1 [II[(4,I,V,10,1111,0 hq 5/ / //p ilillirli,4,WI ,10,1,4",1Wi,11',wqo elp/4://(ww Operations Requirements (f) Hours of Operating 111110 5708 Op to 8:00 p.m. 9:00 a.m. p.m. iiiii, Planning Commission: ii, Ad- Hoc: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 I Id, ill(i,0,fl, irtifir iliVii ,,,i lib ArlAdfill pi /i/'pi (i Hili',11,,,v00,!,liOr it"t//4 1,, r,11, ;101,,111,1„milt,,,,,,onpifoi l( 1 (,0 ( 1'4 ih11111111101i#1,4111'hk/1/1'//17 I(1 I 4 ( ,14411j111,1411'1,64011$,4 1,)4,f I pi/?ill/II) 'P1,'f 111,'0411111'I'POI'AlIt,i1 I I '' If)r 1(/(/I/1 flitg'I1J 11'11,10 11,11111fil'I'j11(` 1 ''''''( j I)),111/11) ri 111,111110'14)1,10'1,1i dAIIIII f i V/V I)).,t ),),iii , ip ,y'l liRt 11#0t1141111011,110011#t 1./4 , li %1,1,),Ig/ ,/z /7 I Illigi t,P11,1IIIIIII 11,4/1.11 III IIN IAN i,/[fl, it/4/1,t/ y pi(iN N ' # ill'illi'l i IVIIIII'ild$11 1 II III i ON (110141. 4 zz;.{e()) (// / (fr 13 of 14 IQ iliiillitril'1111,151;1101;'11''1111i1:151#114,1114r'I',M"' 'Pl(fP',1141)109 'lit'llC:1'1:'1111:91,1'ill,'11),Y1,p111,11;6'11F$14:1;1,1?,,t11 rf 0 70'r,y, 0 10;,,111:,,,1'1101511,51'„,0, ,001111,5101,;11:;',1„0k01:00,0 47 7:0,0 /)0y ,i110011„'0,1111011411,1i,,,10,1,,011$11,0,,,;,,0 4,0,0 ,/0///0/ „b,,,th 0111610,00011:01„rA:1,011b;;„/001,,,i'4,,,,,,00 /04i ''''1,11,101'4111,111,0,q,r1li,,,,,41,Wrkoro g lf,'1)' ,i ,,, JV,,,iillyrnAlo 0 l'ililly[5pHlr,Pol5;51,,,1,1),, ,, o//, ,,,wIc4,414,07, //„ ,4, ,, „„,,,,,,,,„,„„1,„„„,,,, „ ,„,„„,i I i I ) 44 1;,iym,,,,01,,,,„,1111,,,,,o,„,,,,,,„,N„I ,4 „),,,, 143111,411,4[, 4,0,,(4 * 1 (4911,11111111111) 4111110 plj411111I 14 li 4 PI //I/ (.1 1 '4;iiiY11;,0111'),ti,d,i',WohlY;(,11,11,1.A 41//ii,i; liy111,15011Y'N'INJSUri:!,1`,,V',1:1,1//7//117, Conduct Public Hearing ,, alive Dectaration a d Marijuana the Negative„, Con . of [ the Propose adoption 'tte onLy Consider a by ti „, tion *der i introduction nce 11111i, Cons Ordinance Dispensary Ai 70111111'"!ki 4/,,/,7tY*,/,,e/ li'41111,10liorkPAir?„0*/74/1(ii,if 2 y1141,011h6,110,1"),,,Vk'/i)„,,f6j/ i ,,101,111 ,1,4,14°0011:1,11111p'ifilvoiiii,)11,Pi ,111111141110 1 IF,ilok140,,01,..,1,//,07 400/400 , A"Wq '.41111111,,, ,f 4,111'f Al 14101 i iu 1 Y 0 ( / 77 7 '77 17/ 14 of 14 ( , ~ ITEM NO.: 12a � October 19, 2016 MEETING DATE: 9, City of'Ukiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW WELL 9 AND REPLACEMENT WELL 4, SPECIFICATION NO. 16-01 Summary: Staff will be requesting the approval of a Notice of Completion for the Installation of New Well 9 and Replacement Well 4. Background & Discussion: The City Council awarded a contract on March 2, 2016, to NorCal Pump and Well Drilling, Inc. of Yuba City, California in the amount of $702,558. Work on the contract was completed by the contractor in substantial conformance with the approved plans and specifications on September 16, 2016. The final contract cost, based on actual quantities* constructed and change orders approved by the City Engineer was $789,109.40. Additional costs included the following items: 1) Additional pump testing on Monitoring Well 9 ($25,371) 2) Drill and construct Monitoring ($7,700) and Production Well 9 deeper than the plans and specifications ($19,722) * 3) Additional work for the destruction and abandonment of old well 4 ($3,945) 4) Additional development of replacement well Upgrading the sounding and gravel tubes from mild steel to stainless steel ($29,813.40) Both wells have met performance expectations and will improve infrastructure and supply reliability significantly. Final payment of the retention will be made to the contractor after thirty-five days from the date the Notice of Completion (Attachment#1) is filed with the County Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation ' Budget Previous Contract Amount in Source of Funds 1 Account Number Amendment or Purchase Order 16-17 FY (Title& No.) Required No. N/A N/A f N/A Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Accept the work as complete; 2. Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder for the Installation of New Well 9 and Replacement Well 4, Specification 16-01. ALTERNATIVES: N/A Citizens advised: Matt Walker, Project Manager, NorCal Pump and Well Drilling, Inc. Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Prepared by: Jarod Thiele, Public Works Management Analyst Coordinated with: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Presenters: Sean White, Director of Water and Sewer and Jarod Thiele, Public Works Management Analyst Attachment: 1. Notice of Completion COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑ Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note:Please write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted, Approved: Sa ' S ngi omo , City Manager ATTACHMENT 1 Please return to: CITY OF UKIAH 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482-5400 (707)463-6200 No fee pursuant to Government Code 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: 1. That the real property described is owned by the following whose address is: City of Ukiah, a Municipal Corporation, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California 95482-5400. 2. That the nature of the title to the Installation of New Well 9 and Replacement Well 4, Specification No. 16-01 of all said owners is that of fee simple. 3. That on the 16th day of September, 2016, the Contract work for this project was actually completed. 4. That the name and address of the Contractor is NorCal Pump and Well Drilling, 1325 Barry Road, Yuba City, CA 95993 5. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the County of Mendocino, State of California, and is described as follows: City-owned property identified as Well 4 located at 56 Lorraine Street and Well 9 located at 501 Brush Street, Ukiah, CA 95482. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct: City Council Approval CITY OF UKIAH, a Municipal Corporation By: Date Kristine Lawler, City Clerk Date State of California County of Mendocino ITEM NO.: 12b MEETING DATE: October 19, 2016 Ci ,f�,F; AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2016 SEWER & WATER REPLACEMENT PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 16-10 AND DIRECT STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Summary: The City Council will consider approving the plans and specifications number 16-10 for the 2016 Sewer & Water Replacement Project. City Council will also consider directing staff to advertise for bids for this project. Background and Discussion: Per section §22039 of the Public Contracts Code, staff is requesting Council's approval of plans and specifications number 16-10 for the 2016 Sewer & Water Replacement Project. The engineer's estimate, for construction contract items only, for this project is $4,283,861. In addition, staff estimates costs in the amount of $857,000 for construction management, inspection, and materials testing. These additional services will be advertised through a request for proposals. The proposed project will construct the following: new water main and new sewer line with corresponding new water service lines and new sewer laterals on Luce Avenue from S. Dora Street to S. State Street and on Observatory Avenue from Helen Avenue to S. State Street; new water main with corresponding new water service lines on Washington Avenue from S. Dora Street to S. State Street. In addition, new pavement and ADA curb ramps will be constructed on Luce Avenue and Observatory Avenue from Helen Avenue to S. State Street. Lastly, new pavement and ADA curb ramps will be constructed on Washington Avenue from S. Dora Street to S. State Street. Per City Council's direction, staff expanded the public notification process for this project. Please refer to Sections 6-24 and 13-28 of the specifications. The plans and specifications for the project are available for City Council and public review at the Ukiah Civic Center Engineering Department, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California. In addition, the plans and specifications are available for review as attachments #1 (At the time of publication, the specifications were under final review and will be uploaded to the following BOX account when complete: https://cityofukiah.box.co /v/1 -1 -1 61tem1 2b) and#2 (plans). Continued on Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Approve plans and specifications for the 2016 Sewer & Water Replacement Project, Specification No. 16-10 and direct staff to advertise for bids. ALTERNATIVES: N/A Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Contact/Prepared by: Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works Coordinated with: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager and Mary Horger, Purchasing Supervisor Presenter: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attachments: 1. specifications—(At the time of publication, the specifications were under final review and will be uploaded to the following BOX account when complete: ttos✓/ci'i ofukiah.box,co /1 -1 - 161tem 12b) 2. plans COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : U Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: U Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note,Please}vrite Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted. Approved: .JrI � f ,, g•,r'•mo, City Manager Page 2 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation Budget Previous Amount in Source of Funds Account Number Amendment Contract or 16-17 FY (Title& No.) Required Purchase Order No. N/A STP d(1) 50924220.80230 Yes ► No ❑ N/A N/A Water 82224413.80230 Yes ►w No ❑ N/A N/A Sewer 84424421.80230 Yes ► No ■ N/A N/A Traffic Congestion Relief Fund 51024220.80230 Yes /1 No ❑ N/A N/A Gas Tax Fund 50324220.80230 Yes ►1 No ❑ N/A l ITEM NO.: 12c MEETING DATE: October 19, 2016 City of Vkiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Development Schedule Summary: Receive and consider the City's operating budget development and adoption schedule for the 2017-18 fiscal year. Background: California law requires that an annually approved appropriation plan be considered for all local governmental entities. Most produce a budget to satisfy that requirement. The City of Ukiah will be implementing a new budget document for the 2017-18 fiscal year built on best practices,focused on clarity, and presented at the highest level of quality per the guidelines of the Government Finance Officers Association. Discussion: Preparation for the 2017-18 budget has already begun. The Budgeting Best Practices Ad Hoc committee held its first introductory meeting on October 6th and is scheduled to meet no less than monthly until the full budget document is ready for full council consideration. Council members appointed to the Ad Hoc include councilors Crane and Doble. Staff assigned to the budget development task force include the City Manager, Sage Sangiacomo; Human Resources and Risk Management Director, Sheri Mannion; the Finance Director, Daniel Buffalo; and the Management Analyst for the Finance Department, Daphine Harris. Ms. Harris will be the principal team member charged with managing the details of this process and will be the primary budget-related contact for all staff and the council. A sound,well-managed budget for a governmental entity is a living document. It is subject to regular review and amendment, is clear and understandable, is scrutinized frequently, and its development thoughtfully planned and executed. The City of Ukiah's 2017-18 budget will exhibit these characteristics, starting with planning. The attached schedule (Attachment #1) outlines the development process, key dates, and milestones. The following are those of note: February 15, 2017. City Council will conduct a priority and goals setting workshop. The purpose of this is to identify the areas of service delivery, operations, capital improvement, and special projects that council considers to be most critical, important, and desirable for the coming year. To engage the public, staff is considering ways to gauge public sentiment parallel to that of council. Continued on Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Move to acce•t the budget devcippluent and adoption schedule for the 2017-18 fiscal ear. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve but provide direction to staff. Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Daniel Buffalo, Finance Director Prepared by/Contact; Daphine Harris, Management Analyst Coordinated with: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Presenters: Daniel Buffalo, Finance Director and Daphine Harris, Management Analyst Attachment: 1. 2017-18 Budget Development Schedule COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑ Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note:Please write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when dralTed. 5.91,0 Approved: g an omo, City Manager Page 2 of 2 March 1. City team members responsible for budget development at the department level will begin training on budget development and input to Munis,the City's enterprise resources and planning software. Finance is working to deploy Munis City-wide to allow direct input of department budgets and will conduct the necessary training of staff. In the past, the budget was built in Excel and input to the financial system. The process is laden with potential pitfalls, such as maintaining consistency and flow of numbers from one area of the budget to another. This year department budgets will be built in Munis and transferred to other applications (such as Excel) later for incorporation into published documents. This will improve efficiency in data entry and mitigate issues of consistency and flow. March 13. Departments will begin meeting with Finance and the City Manager on initial budget requests. Finance will receive those numbers and begin analysis comparing it to revenue forecasts. April 17. Second round meetings with departments and the City Manager will begin. This is when individual departmental budgets are aligned at the fund level to ensure requests are supported by available resources and meet the goals and priorities established by management and the City Council. May 17. Budget 101 and presentation of budget format to Council. Here the budget team will present the budget document in template form for consideration by Council. Final comments on its presentation will be received by staff, and introductory training will be held on budgeting, including how to read the document,the role council plays in its implementation, and to take any general questions on budgeting and its purpose. June 7. The full, complete recommended budget document to Council during its first regular meeting in June. This kicks off the first formal review of the 2017-18 budget with anticipation of adoption by the end of the month. This schedule is formidable yet flexible. Because we are attempting a new approach to the budget, it will require perseverance to stay on track. However, dates may change as unforeseen challenges arise and require time to address. Knowing this going into the process creates the right frame of mind for everyone involved in developing what will be an end product that will be indelibly beneficial to staff, council, and the community. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation Budget Previous Amount in Source of Funds Account Number Amendment Contract or 16-17 FY (Title& No.) Required Purchase Order No. N/A N/A N/A Yes ❑ No ® N/A Attachment#1 Budget Development Schedule Fiscal Year: 2017-18 Completion Activity Tasks Start Date Date • Open planning discussion Budget ad hoc committee • GFOA Better budgeting webinar October 6 May and task force convenes • Discussion of budget format and key elements • Receive counciUcommunity communication City Council budget • Discuss priorities for the fiscal year February 15, priority/goal setting • Discuss capital and special projects 2017 workshop • Discuss goals and objectives • Schedule budget meetings with Departments Department initiation • Distribute budget instructions memo February February 28 • Distribute budget workbooks Budget training—Munis • Week of hands-on budget training Central Budget • Computer Lab—Set up in Conference Room March 1 March 10 3 Preliminary Budget • CM and Finance meet with individual Meetings department heads for initial budget requests March 13 March 24 and discussion • Review appropriation requests City Manager review of • Meet with Finance for discussion/analysis March 27 April 14 budget requests • Finance to conduct preliminary revenue forecasts for all major funds • Department head meetings with CM and Reconciled Budget Finance Meetings with City • Discussion of appropriation requests April 17 April 28 Manager • Finalize initial appropriation requests Receipt of supplemental • Last opportunity for DH to make appropriation requests appropriation request changes prior to May May 31 Council hearings • Finalize revenue estimates Finalize Draft Budget • Complete special revenue funds and Document trust/agency funds May May 31 • Circulate for review/edits • Budget 101 Budget Training w/ • Discussion of format May 17 Council • Presentation First Budget Hearing with • Presentation of budget proposal Council(special • Discussion of changes from prior year June 7 meeting/workshop) • Take questions and requests from Council Finance Department Rev 9/29/16 Attachment#1 Second Budget Hearing • Discussion with Council • Q&A June 14 • Take requests and revisions Public Hearing w Council • Final Q&A —Adoption of either final • Final revisions June 21 or tentative • Adoption—tentative or final • Final Q&A Final Budget workshopJune 28 • Final revisions and hearing,if necessaryAdoption/continuation of 16/17 budget (If necessary) • Finance Department Rev 9/29/16 ITEM NO.: 13a MEETING DATE: October 19, 2016 City of Ukiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ACT (SGMA) Summary: Staff will update the Council on local implementation of Sustainable Groundwater Management Act(SGMA). Background: On May 6, 2015, City Staff provided information to the City Council regarding the new regulations by the State of California to comply with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). This Act, SGMA, requires that groundwater basins of"medium priority" are monitored and have a groundwater management plan. On May 20th of 2015, Council created a SGMA Ad Hoc and appointed Councilmembers Crane and Doble to the committee. On May 18th, 2016, Council approved a contract with UC Davis to conduct a Groundwater Characterization Study. Discussion: SGMA has a number of aggressive timelines that must be met or local control will be abdicated to the State of California. As a "medium priority basin" under SGMA, the Ukiah Valley must have a governance structure in place by June 30, 2017, and a have a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) complete by January 31st of 2020. The County of Mendocino has continued to lead the effort to organize the community in response to SGMA, and the City has remained an active participant in these efforts. The County has recently received several grants to help fund the development of local SGMA governance as well as a GSP. Recent efforts have focused on developing a governance structure for the Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA). A number of alternatives were considered at meetings organized by the County's facilitator, but the formation of a new Joint Powers Authority (JPA) has emerged as the preferred structure for the GSA. The proposed composition, structure, and preliminary policies of the JPA are described in the attachment (Attachment 1) prepared by the County. Annual "dues" are being proposed for funding the JPA, similar to the Inland Water and Power Commission (IWPC). Proposed dues for the GSA are currently $5000 per member per year. Some non- governmental members may not pay, but those members will also have limited voting. Development of a draft agreement for the formation of the JPA is the next step in the governance process. In addition, there has been some discussion regarding future studies necessary to complete the preparation of a compliant GSP. Proposed studies include the impending USGS groundwater/surface water study, as well as other UCD studies being sponsored by the IWPC. The combined cost of these Continued on Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION IS I: Receive u+date and provide direction to staff ALTERNATIVES: N/A Citizens advised: SGMA Ad-Hoc Requested by: Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Contact/Prepared by: Sean White, Director of Water and Sewer Coordinated with: Tim Eriksen Director of Public Works/City Engineer Presenter: Sean White, Director of Water and Sewer Attachment: 1. Proposed Structure of Governance COUNCIL ACTION DATE: : ❑ Approved ❑ Continued to ❑ Other RECORDS APPROVED: ❑Agreement: ❑ Resolution: ❑ Ordinance: Note°Please write Agreement No.in upper right corner of agreement when drafted Approved: - a S i o, City anager Page 2 of 2 approximately$280,000 over the next 5 years. Shared equally amongst IWPC and JPA members, this will be approximately $15,000 per year for 4 years per member. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted New Appropriation 1 Budget Previous Amount in Source of Funds Account Number Amendment Contract or 16-17 FY (Title&No.) Required Purchase Order No. N/A N/A N/A Yes ❑ No ® N/A Attachment#1 Proposed Structure for "Option 2" - New JPA 11,111111111111111111111,1,1,11111,1,1,111111 iiWD1))JAT) 11l1J�� 1 'Hp HEINEN„„„„ u»,0J"IIJII IIJ1�01�fJ�� ii J1����� mil) uN ,,0„11 �1,,,,,,,V 04 uuul gpi » ��%1 � Ip �� i� .i 6� U� .U, pmh . 11111 q pi so,1�4�� 50,d1 � � il�� l�« � � �001111,1„111) hi ill 6'0101001i uuuiuuuui0i6uif0 HO � o � 0\� it � ulo11111111111111 i 0�I00 0I . . 0 Notes: 1. JPA member are Upper Russian River Agency, Russian River Flood Control, Mendocino County,City of Ukiah and Sonoma County Water Agency (MCRCD—TBD). 2. Governing Board Seats: Upper Russian Rivers Water Agency (URRWA), Russian River Flood Control (RRFC), Mendocino County, City of Ukiah, Mendocino County Resource Conservation District(MCRCD), Sonoma County Water Agency(SCWA), an Agricultural Seat(appointment defined in JPA)and a Tribal Seat(appointment defined in JPA). 3.One vote per Governing Board entity. Non-paying members vote on only non-fiscal matters. 4.Governing Board two-year appointment terms. Each member will appoint one representative and one alternate. 5. Majority vote for all decisions. 6. Public meetings will provide a mechanism for stakeholders and public input. 7.Create a mechanism for membership dues for operational cost of JPA. 8. Option for an advisory,ad hoc or technical committee in the bylaws,should the JPA need to utilize it at some point.