HomeMy WebLinkAboutRau & Associates, Inc. 2013-06-19 . ' ," !� 13 I ti l l��
' AGREEMENTFOR
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
Rau and Associates
This Agreement, made and entered into this ��day of J��. iv� , 2013 ("Effective
Date"), by and between CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
Rau and Associates, Inc., a corporation organized and in good standing under the laws of the
state of California, hereinafter referred to as "ConsultanY'.
RECITALS
This Agreement is predicated on the following facts:
a. City requires consulting services related to the hydraulic study of a storm drain system
within the City of Ukiah to determine capacity and to recommend improvements. This is
part of the City's program to address flooding on Perkins Street between Hospital Drive
and Orchard Avenue. I
b. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, skills, experience and is properly
licensed to provide these services, and is willing to provide them according to the terms
of this Agreement.
c. City and Consultant agree upon the Scope-of-Work and Work Schedule attached hereto
as Attachment "A", describing contract provisions for the project and setting forth the '
completion dates for the various services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement.
TERMS OF AGREEMENT
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
1.1 The Project is described in detail in the attached Scope-of-Work (Attachment "A").
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.1 As set forth in Attachment "A".
2.2. Additional Services. Additional services, if any, shall only proceed upon written
agreement between City and Consultant. The written Agreement shall be in the form of
an Amendment to this Agreement.
3.0 CONDUCT OF WORK
3.1 Time of Completion. Consultant shall commence performance of services as required
by the Scope-of-Work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete
such services within 45 Days from receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Consultant shall
complete the work to the City's reasonable satisfaction, even if contract disputes arise or
Consultant contends it is entitled to further compensation.
oes�gn-Professiona�Sernce Agreement-M11a¢n 25.20'�3 Rt 3G t o
PAGE t OF 12
' 4.0 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
4.1 Basis for Compensation. For the performance of the professional services of this
Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated on a time and expense basis not to
exceed a guaranteed maximum dollar amount of $15,400. Labor charges shall be
based upon hourly billing rates for the various classifications of personnel employed by
Consultant to perform the Scope of Work as set forth in the attached Attachment B,
, which shall include all indirect costs and expenses of every kind or nature, except direct
expenses. The direct expenses and the fees to be charged for same shall be as set
' forth in Attachment B. Consultant shall complete the Scope of Work for the not-to-
exceed guaranteed maximum, even if actual time and expenses exceed that amount.
4.2 Chanqes. Should changes in compensation be required because of changes to the
Scope-of-Work of this Agreement, the parties shall agree in writing to any changes in
compensation. "Changes to the Scope-of-Work" means different activities than those
described in Attachment "A" and not additional time to complete those activities than the
parties anticipated on the date they entered this Agreement.
4.3 Sub-contractor Pavment. The use of sub-consultants or other services to perform a
portion of the work of this Agreement shall be approved by City prior to commencement
of w�rk. The cost of sub-consultants shall be included within guaranteed not-to-exceed
amount set forth in Section 4.1.
4.4 Terms of Pavment. Payment to Consultant for services rendered in accordance with this ,
contract shall be based upon submission of monthly invoices for the work satisfactorily
performed prior to the date of invoice less any amount already paid to Consuttant, which
amounts shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after receipt by City. The invoices
� shall provide a description of each item of work performed, the time expended to perform
each task, the fees charged for that task, and the direct expenses incurred and billed for. '
Invoices shall be accompanied by documentation sufficient to enable City to determine
progress made and the expenses claimed.
5.0 ASSURANCES OF CONSULTANT
5.1 Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely
responsible for its acts or omissions. Consultant (including its agents, servants, and
employees) is not City's agent, employee, or representative for any purpose.
It is the express intention of the parties hereto that Consultant is an independent
contractor and not an employee, joint venturer, or partner of City for any purpose
whatsoever. City shall have no right to, and shall not control the manner or prescribe the
method of accomplishing those services contracted to and performed by Consultant
under this Agreement, and the general public and all governmental agencies regulating
such activity shall be so informed.
Those provisions of this Agreement that reserve ultimate authority in City have been
inserted solely to achieve compliance with federal and state laws, rules, regulations, and
interpretations thereof. No such provisions and no other provisions of this Agreement
shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer
and employee between Consultant and City.
Consultant shall pay all estimated and actual federal and state income and self-
employment taxes that are due the state and federal government and shall furnish and
' pay worker's compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and any other benefits
required by law for himself and his employees, if any. Consultant agrees to indemnify
Desgn-Prolessonai Servire Agreemem-Marcn 25.2013 R i 30t0
PAGE 2 OF i2
i_ .. _.__ .. ._. .
' �
and hold City and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any
' claims or demands by federal, state or local government agencies for any such taxes or
benefits due but not paid by Consultant, including the legal costs associated with �
defending against any audit, claim, demand or law suit. I
Consultant warrants and represents that it is a properly licensed professional or
professional organization with a substantial investment in its business and that it
maintains its own offices and staff which it will use in performing under this Agreement.
52 Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibility is solely
to Ciry. Consultant has no interest and will not acquire any direct or indirect interest that I
would conflict with its performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall not in the
' performance of this Agreement employ a person having such an interest. If the City
Manager determines that the Consultant has a disclosure obligation under the City's
local conflict of interest code, the Consultant shall file the required disclosure form with
the City Clerk within 10 days of being notified of the City Manager's determination. �
6.0 INDEMNIFICATION
6.1 Insurance Liability. Without limiting ConsultanYs obligations arising under Paragraph 62
Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreemert until it procures and maintains for
the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or
damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with its performance under
this Agreement.
I
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance �
, Coverage shall be at least as broad as: �
,�
1. Insurance Services Office ("ISO) Commercial General Liabiliry Coverage
Form No. CG 00 01 11 85. '
2. ISO Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 I
"any auto" or Code 8, 9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025.
3. Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the
State of California and Employers Liability Insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession. Architects' and engineers' coverage is to be endorsed to
include contractual liability.
B. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
1. General Liabilitv: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial
General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
, used, the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work
performed under this Agreement, or the aggregate limit shall be twice the
prescribed per occurrence limit.
D=sign-Prolessionai Serv¢e Agreemem-Marcn 25,20 t 3 R13010
PAGE 3 OF 12
___ _ _ _ __ ._ _
.
' I
2. Automobile Liabilitv: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for '
bodily injury and property damage. I
3. Worker's Compensation and Emplovers Liability: Worker's compensation
limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and
Employers Liability limits of$1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions liabilitv: $500,000 per occurrence.
C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by
the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate
such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
D. Other Insurance Provisions
The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: I
1. General Liabilitv and Automobile Liability Coveraqes I
a. The City, it officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as additional insureds as respects; liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products
and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, hired
or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no
special limitations on the scope-of-protection afforded to the City, '
its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. i
b. The ConsultanYs insurance coverage shall be primary insurance I
as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in '
excess of the ConsultanYs insurance and shall not contribute with
it.
c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
d. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's Iiability.
2. Worker's Compensation and EmploVers Liability Coveraqe
The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from
ConsultanYs performance of the work, pursuant to this Agreement.
3. Professional Liabilitv Coveraqe
Desgn-Pm�essonai Servme Agreemem-�damn 25.20 i 3 R13o 10
I PAGE C OF 12
�
If written on a claims-made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the
effective date of this Agreement. The policy period shall extend from
February 28, 2013 to February 28, 2014.
4. All Coveraqes
, Each Insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state �
that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, I
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written i
notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the
City. '
E. Acceptability of Insurers ',
Insurance is to be placed with admitted California insurers with an A.M. BesYs I
rating of no less than A- for financial strength, AA for long-term credit rating and
AMB-1 for short-term credit rating. '
F. Verification of Coveraqe
Consultant shall furnish the City with Certificates of Insurance and with original
Endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates j
and Endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The Certificates and
Endorsements are to be on forms provided or approved by the City. All
Certificates and Endorsements are to be received and approved by the City
before Consultant begins the work of this Agreement. The City reserves the right
to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any
time. If Consultant fails to provide the coverages required herein, the City shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or all of them. In that
event, after notice to Consultant that City has paid the premium, the cost of
insurance may be deducted from the compensation otherwise due the contractor
under the terms of this Contract.
G. Subcontractors ��
If Consultant uses subcontractors or sub-consultants, it shall cover them under
its policies or require them to separately comply with the insurance requirements
set forth in this Paragraph 6.1.
6.2 Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition
thereto, Consultant agrees to indemnify the City for any claim, cost or liability that arises
out of, or pertains to, or relates to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of
the Consultant and its agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this
indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons,
injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or
defects in design by the City, or arising from the active negligence of the City.
"Indemnify," as used herein includes the expenses of defending against a claim and the
payment of any settlement or judgment arising out of the claim. Defense costs include
all costs associated with defending the claim, including, but not limited to, the fees of
attorneys, investigators, consultants, experts and expert witnesses, and litigation
expenses.
. Design-Pmfessionai5erv¢eAgreement-Marcn25.20t3 R130i0
PAGE 5 OF 12
. ._ __ — _ . _._. __- — __ ._—. . ._
.
References in this paragraph to City or Consultant, indude their officers, employees,
agents, and subcontractors. I
ConsultanYs liability for professional negligence shall be limited to $500,000.
7.0 CONTRACT PROVISIONS
, 7.1 Documents and Ownership of Work. All documents furnished to Consultant by City and
all documents or reports and supportive data prepared by Consultant under this
Agreement are owned and become the property of the City upon their creation and shall
I be given to City immediately upon demand and at the completion of ConsultanYs
services at no additional cost to City. Deliverables are identified in the Scope-of-Work,
Attachment "A". All documents produced by Consultant shali be furnished to City in
digital format and hardcopy. Consultant shall produce the digital format, using software
and media approved by City.
7.2 Governinq Law. Consultant shall comply with the laws and regulations of the United
States, the State of California, and all local governments having jurisdiction over this
Agreement. The interpretation and eniorcement of this Agreement shall be governed by
California law and any action arising under or in connection with this Agreement must be
' filed in a Court of competent jurisdiction in Mendocino County. j
7.3 Entire Aqreement. This Agreement plus its Attachment(s) and executed Amendments
set forth the entire understanding between the parties.
7.4 Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent I
jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect.
7.5 Modification. No modification of this Agreement is valid unless made with the agreement
of both parties in writing. �I
7.6 Assiqnment. ConsultanYs services are considered unique and personaL Consultant
I shall not assign, transfer, or sub-contract its interest or obligation under all or any portion
of this Agreement without City's prior written consent.
7.7 Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement
' shall be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant,
term or condition or a waiver of the covenant, term or condition itself.
7.8 Termination. This Agreement may only be terminated by either party: 1) for breach of
� the Agreement; 2) because funds are no longer available to pay Consultant for services
provided under this Agreement; or 3) City has abandoned and does not wish to complete
the project for which Consultant was retained. A party shall notify the other party of any
alleged breach of the Agreement and of the action required to cure the breach. If the
breaching party fails to cure the breach within the time specified in the notice, the
, contract shall be terminated as of that time. If terminated for lack of funds or
abandonment of the project, the contract shall terminate on the date notice of
termination is given to Consultant. City shall pay the Consultant only for services
performed and expenses incurred as of the effective termination date. In such event, as
a condition to payment, Consultant shall provide to City all finished or unfinished
documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports
prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be entitled to
receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed
' Des-gn—Pro@ss�onei5ervireAgreemeni—March25,20�3 Ri3010
PnGEOOF t2
hereunder, subject to off-set for any direct or consequential damages City may incur as
a result of Consuttant's breach of contract.
7.9 Duplicate Oriqinals. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each
bearing the original signature of the parties. When so signed, each such document shall
be admissible in administrative or judicial proceedings as proof of the terms of the
Agreement between the parties.
8.0 NOTICES
Any notice given under this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed given when
personally delivered or deposited in the mail (certified or registered) addressed to the
parties as follows: '
MR. TIM ERIKSEN RAU AND ASSOCIATES, WC.
CITY OF UKIAH 100 NORTH PINE STREET
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 95482
300 SEMINARY AVENUE
UKIAH, CALIFORNIA 95482-5400
li
I
I
I�I
�II
, �esgn-Pmlessona�SermceAgreement-Marcn25.20t3 Rt3010
PAGE�OF 12
.
9.0 SIGNATURES I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the Effective Date: I�
CONSULTANT II
� � � ' � Z� � �
BY: �:3-C,:��d�L C", i� �tc��. v�� r� / i
' � ate �
PRINT NAME: Georqe C. Rau P.E. C21908 I
PRESIDENT
94-2619557
IRS IDN Number
CITY OF UKIAH
BY: .
V � ; /c� 02 �/l
Janc Chambers e
� CITY MANAGER
I
ATTEST I
BY �� �li� � l`����i �� ���,� u �<<, ��-,3 I
��iZiSTl�6 Li}v�r.ER Date
CITY CLERK
I
il
I
�
Design-Professional Sen¢e Agreement-Ma¢h 25.2013 R13010
PAGE 8 OF t 2
_-
J
i _ . _ _ . ——_ . . _ _ _ _
___ _ __ ___
"ATTACHMENT A, Page 1"
Scope of Work
Rau and Associates, Inc., also referred to herein as 'RAU", will provide the following services for City of
Ukiah herein also referred to as "City". Work wiil include: il
Proiect Description: �
Hydraulic Studv for Perkins Street Drainape Between Hospital Drive and Orchard Avenue
The scope of work includes preparing a hydraulic study to determine the capacity of the existing system
and to make recommendatlon regarding improvements to the drainage system along Perkins Street i
Ibetween Hospital Drive and Orchard Avenue. If feasible, drainage improvements will be tied into the
storm drain along Orchard Avenue that then ties into Orrs Creek.
The preparation of this study would involve the following basic tasks:
L Research
a. Research existing City as-built (Public works and building permit files) and GPS I
information to determine the existing in-ground drainage features. This task assumes that
the city has gathered all available information related to the drainage area for review by I
the consultant, including: city drainage base maps and as-builts; drainage studies;
building permits, use and encroachment permit from development to the project area and
GIS data. The consultant would review the data and determine the applicable extent of
I the information needed. City would provide copies of all requested documents.
2. Base Map Preparation:
� a. Prepare Preliminary Base map for use in the drainage study based on the available city
data overlaid on the City GIS Base maps. Base maps will encompass all areas draining I
to the project area.
b. Field confirm existing drainage storm drain system information and basic grading and
drainage patterns to confirm accuracy of the map.
c. Obtain additional field measurements where discrepancies are evidenL This work would
not be survey grade information, but would be sufficient to perform the drainage study
(depth of baslns/size of culverts). �
I
3. Hydraulic Study:
, a. The Natural Resource Conservation Service (SCS) method will be used so that a
time/flow hydraulic model is developed. This method would more accurately reflect the i
runoff occurring and coincidence of flows within the system. The rainfall data will be
based on the following: �
i. The model will encompass all areas that contribute flows to the Orchard Avenue
storm drain system to Orrs Creek. The flows along Orrs creek will be modeled
based on the hydrograph published in the Report entitled "Potential I
Environmental Impacts to Hydrology and Drainage and Recommendations for
Mitigation for Brush Street Triangle DevelopmenY', April 2006, prepared by Rau
and Associates, Inc.
ii. Rainfall data will be consistent with that used for the Brush Street St�dy noted
above.
Desgn-ProfesAOnal Semre Agreement-Marm 25.2013 Rt JOt 0
PAGE 9 OF R
I
b. The 10- and 100-year storm events will be modeled.
a Improvement Standards will be based on the following criteria:
i. 10 year flows shall not overtop storm drain inlets. All flows in gutter shall not
encroach into the travelled way.
ii. 100 year flows will not overtop the curb heights as it drains to the natural
waterway (Orrs Creek).
Deliverables Include:
I 1. Draft Study: 1 hard copy of the draft study will be submitted to the City Engineer for review. This
submlttal will accompany a meeting with the City Engineer. i
2. Final Study: Comments made by the city will be included in the final study. 1 hard copy of the
final signed study along with a disk of the electronic copy will be submitted.
3. The estimated costs to prepare this study is $15,400 and assumes a maximum of 4 hours of field �
work to verify the existing storm drain system. ,
4. No improvement design or cost estimates are included as part of this scope.
� Exdusions
1. Mapping for this study is solely for the purpose of the drainage study and would not be
appropriate for design purposes.
2. If it is found that the existing drainage system cannot be determined (points of connection, size of '
pipes), with the information provided by the City and supplemented by surface field observation,
the consultant will notify the city and discuss the implications of making assumptions or �
recommend that the city perform subsurface investigations to confirm the assumptions. No
potholing or surveying is included in the scope of this project j
I 3. New Regression formulas have been derived for California in December of 2012. The 2006
Drainage Study for the Brush Street Triangle used flows in Orrs Creek that were developed from I
the 1977 Regression formulas (Waananen and Crippen), which were appropriate at the time of
the study. Since that time the Regression formulas that are used to determine peak flow rates
I have been updated. This study would not reflect these revised flood flows based on updated
Regression formulas. The city should note that it is estimated that the updated Regression
Formulas would increase the flows. The study is available online at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5113/pdf/si2012-5113.pdf. Attachment C is an excerpt from the
study showing the comparative Standard Errors of Estimate using the old (1977) and new (2012)
Regression equations and also the Conclusion of the 2012 study. Revisions or updates to the I
FEMA flows for Orrs Creek which would affect the tailwater of the downstream water surface in
Orrs Creek are not included in the scope of this studv.
i
I
Design-Pmlessonal Serv¢e Agreemem-Marcn 25.2013 R13010
PAGE 10 OF 12
I
"ATTACHMENT A, Page 2"
Work Schedule and Budget
I SCHEDULE OF WORK: '
RAU realizes that the timely performance of the services provided is an important element of this
Agreement. RAU will endeavor to complete the work with due and reasonable diligence consistent with ,
sound professional practice and within the time frame noted below. RAU and the Client agree to
cooperate with each other in every way on the project and to solicit the cooperation of other parties who j
may influence the schedule of the work.
The time of completion noted below is an estimate only and RAU is not responsible for circumstances
beyond its control. It is also possible that as the project proceeds, sound professional practice may I
necessitate additional work being done and hence additional time may be needed for completion.
RAU will begin the work within 10 days of receipt of this signed Agreement. RAU anticipates that work
will be completed within 45 days after commencing work.
, RETAINER:
None Required
PAYMENT:
i Client agrees to pay a Maximum Not-to-Exceed Fee of $ 15,400, based upon time, fee schedule and
direct project costs; also provided that if the work is canceled, terminated or otherwise discontinued
without fault by RAU the work done to the date of termination shall be paid for on an hourly basis in
accordance with "Attachment B", Schedule of Fees.
If additional work is requested or required, which is not covered in the Scope of Work, the Client agrees
to meet with representatives of RAU to discuss changes in the scope, schedule, cost or other Terms of
Agreement. If modifications to the Agreement are required, RAU will prepare an amendment to the
Agreement for Professional Consulting Services for execution by the Client and RAU.
NOTE. Hourly rates on the Schedule of Fees are valid (or one year irom the date o( this
Agreement. Thereafter, if RAU �aises its fees to all Clients, the Schedule of Fees for this project
may be amended accordingly.
II
II
I
il
�es�qn-Pmlessmnal Senice Agreement-Marc�25.2013 R13010
PAGE 11 OF 12
I —. . . _. _ __— _ _
.
�
ATTACHMENT B
SCHEDULE OF FEES - Table 31 '
Effective October 1, 2012 �
Registered Civil Enyineer Principal $162.00/hr. I
Senior Registered Civil Engineer 145.00/hr.
Associate Civil Engineer 120.00/hr.
Project Manager 102.00/hr.
Land Surveyor 96.00/hr. ;
Lab-Survey Manager 112.00/hr. �
Staff EngineedStaff Surveyor 94.00/hr.
Water Pollution Control Manager(PW) �40.00/hr. ',
QSD/QSP Specialist(Non PW) 110.00/hr. '�
Instrument Operator(PW) �04.00/hr. I
Rodman (PW) 92.00/hr.
Materials Tester including PW (nuclear gauge charge may apply) 116.00/hr. .
Construction Inspector (PW) 128.00lhr.
Technician IV 72.00/hr.
Technician III 66.00/hr.
� Technician II 54.00/hr.
- Technician I 38.00/hr. �
Administretion 48.00/hr. i,
Vehicle Use(subject to change due to Intemal Revenue Standards) 0.555/mile I
Outside Services Over$1,000 Cost+5% %
Outside Services Under 51,000 (Aggregate amount) Cost+ 15% '�
Expert WitnesslTestimony at Trial, Deposition, Arbitration $250.00/hr. (4 hour minimum) ��
Laboratory Tests: ;
TexWre Analysis (Mendocino County Health Dept.) $45.00/ea. �
Unil Dry Weight-Moisture Content(Tube Sample or Ped) 35.00/ea �
Sand Equivalent(CTM 217) 110.00/ea.
Sieve Analysis-Coarse Aggregates (CTM 202) 50.00/ea. ,
Sieve Analysis- Fine Aggregate (CTM 202) 90.00/ea �
Maximum Dry Density (ASTM D�557)
4" Mold 205.00/ea.
6" Mold 235.00/ea. '�.
Maximum Dry Density(ASTM D698) 190.00/ea.
Maximum Wet Density (CTM 216) 235.00/ea. I
Unit Weight of Aggregate (CTM 212) '',
Method A or B 55.00/ea. ��
Method C 39.00/ea. I
Crushed Particle Analysis (CTM 205) 67.00/ea. I
Cleanness Value (CTM 227) 67.00/ea .
Durability Index- Coarse (CTM 229) 140.00/ea. i
Durability Index- Fine (CTM 229) 220.00/ea,
Specific Gravity&Absorption (CTM 206) 90.00/ea.
Plasticity Index (ASTM 4318) 162.00/ea. 'I
Expansion Index (UBC Standard 18-2) 190.00/ea. I
Unit Weight of Fresh Concrete (CTM 518) Technician Hourly Rate I
Ball Penetration (CTM 533) Technician Hourly Rate
Air Content of Fresh Concrete (CTM 504) Technician Hourly Rate
Sample Preparetion Times Technician Hourly Ra[e
Special Equipment Rates: Supplemental Billings: �
Computer Aided Design Software S10.00lhr. Engineering Copies 24 X 36 53.00/sheet I
Nuclear Gauge S100/per day` Engineering Copies 18 X 26 $2.00/sheet
All Terrain Vehicle $45.00/per day* Assessor's Map Copies $2.00/sheet
GPS Equipment $600/per day' Survey Monuments $3.00/each
Robotic Total Station $200/per day" Steel Fence Posts $8.00/each
' One Day Minimum Charge
Invoices will be rendered monthly, as a flnal or progress billing. whichever applies, and are payable upon receipt,
unless a mutually acceptable payment schedule has been established. Late Fees at a rate of 1 %z% per month,
computed and charged monthly on the unpaid balances, shall be payable on accounts not paid within 30 days from
invoice date.
IDesign-Prolessonal5ervmeAgree.reni-Ma¢M125,2�13 Rt30ID
I PAGE 12 OF 12
� _ . — _.— _ _. _ —..
, , , , ,
Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency '
Methods for Determining Magnitude and Frequency
of Floods in California, Based on Data through
Water Year 2006 '
� �
, � � �1 "� '`'�
z ����� � , � ,
, �
p� ` `i�' �!S�� `'�i ;�t"'�1' ,y�r ,'�(�/, ", .� I
k�°�+'�' t Y�VK,1� ` :. rJ� 5, �
.
"r ', . y� i ', ' �/�,; ,:_ � � � ,j . ,�.
J -. k,�f�� :ti \+ `ti�t'sr° r' ��1 �,��r'�' � `;
� A� � r
k _.� � � i ��� � V�:. �� ; . I . , .
� jN
Wf � � �A�.�tii�
'�1i...�., : N.+� r � 1 �1�`��t'��� ,��1 l'�t .+� M�m�M'�i��.
�
"^ .�
.• c!i . � i �' �•� . . i
t�S. .��l,�•y� . .� 1 • I
- ,,t
"''',.d�,�� iii. � ��
, � .. .. �
h ":'a�..,�.� , � �'. � � ,
�y. •. , �' . � '
fa���� v4 1 i . .. I
w� �'
1�
:,4� �� . �� � ' 1I '
R T �4 • ti y�,�
'. � ��ip.�, ' q' At .
y . Myn r Y ,.�4�
;} r{t 3}r`�� � � ^�Y'r:��!
� ?-� ���s ,:.�q.� + y. 'S ,S'mi�.,
� � {�y�Y�^.t,`at` - �;' ��Y,
1T s
I
Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5113
U.S. Department of the Interior 'I
U.S. Geological Survey
I
ATTACHMENT C
16 Methods tor Determining Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in California,Based on Data through Water Year 2006 III
Ta61e 6. Average vari2nce of prediction,average standard error of prediction,and Useudo coefficient of detennination for the regional
regression equations.
I fl'P..i.u. � :.n��n.cofn�e.L.uon�.lE -..nuc.r iLnlrn��,r��f���Inine2..,,... .�.rudoc�e0lueNald��envn�n ,i. . i,� ipph:ubWl
Percent Hydrologic region(shown in p1.1)
annual Nohh Coast IReyion 1) Lahonten(Region 2) Sierra Nevada IRegion 3)
exceedance qVP SE R' AVP Sf R' AVP SE R' 'I
probability a.•.. no�ce o...• n.•�ea n,... o..w.
Ilog unitsl Ipercent) (percenq Ilog unitsl Ipercend Ipercentl Ilog unitsl Iperceml (percentl
ju u ncb SN.r, ��;- u �,,, „-.� v,n u.u��; -a J Js�:
?U O.U3R 47.4 ')�.4 U.UJK 8_'7 FS.fi 0.(1.19 i;.q 9?0 �
10 II,Oid a;.? 95) U.OS) 77] NG.( O.U4J 51.5 9�.3 �
4 0.032 4?.7 9C.0 O.OA6 76.1 86J 0.046 52.3 91.G �'
2 0 fli? 1?7 )G.0 20h5 75_7 KC+.0 0_0;9 Sj.(� 9p.R '
I 0.034 443 95.6 0.088 77.2 8G.0 0.055 SR.O 8).6 i
0� lilli} ;Ja Oi.(� U.U91 78.0 K5,2 11.0(0 GI.$ riN.�
11? Ll lli(� }G.0 O].: 01)99 V?0 R.J.O 0.117U b7_i �(�.i
Percent Hydrologic region(shown in pl.1) I
annual Central Coast(Hegion 4) South Coast(flegion 5) Deseh(flegion 6) ,
exceedance qVP SE,n Rpuoeo AVP SE�� Ro��,,,, AVP Sf�� R�
pro6e6ility (�ag units) Ipercent) (percenq pog units) (percenq (percentl (log unitsl (percent) (percent)
:u u'J3 IGI t� 7n.�� u.loJ I3J.3 6t�o 0_;2; �14.'
?U 0.1�5 97.0 SG3 0_09) $i.l 7$.$ p.iq'_ 22G2 -
IU UA9'_ 72J %`)? ILUti2 !,l.0 ShA U.i71 34N.1 -
4 0.075 (9.9 9U.7 0.04J 51.5 91.4 0.432 .97.6 -
? 2Ufi9 GG? 91.1 0.03R d7.(i 9i.1 OA`)3 35(9 -
I 0.070 GG.9 91.0 Q038 47.2 93] 0.572 444.3 -
US 0.071 (7.6 9U.6 0.029 17J �).:9 U.(GS 57J5 _- I
02 0.07R 71.5 R9.8 0.045 52.0 93.i O.R13 856.? -
I
Tahle 1. Standard errors of estimate from this investigation and from Waananen and Cnppen (19771. I
Hydrologic region(shawn in pl.1) �I
Nonh Caast Lahontan Sierra Neveda Central Coasl Soulh Coast '
Percem (Hegion 1) (Hegion 2) (flegion 31 (Region 4) (Hegion 5)
annual Standnrd error ot estimate(SE�)
exceedance (log unitsl
probability '.
This Waananen This Waennne� This Waenanen Thia Weanenen This Wennenen
invesGgation and Crippen investiga6on and Crippen investigetion and Crippen invesligeGon end Crippen invasligation end Crippen '�
120121 (7977) 12012) (1977) (2012) U977) (2012) (19771 12012) U971) I
;u u_°i U?6 0_:1 O.JO u.;; Il3J (i.1k 1�J7 U.J: aJ7 ,
au o-i�� o,za o.sn o.3s o.ao o.ia u.sa o.a�� n.;n n.s� �
III II.IR U.2.1 U.?R 0_:R 11.'_: II.^? II�Y Il.ji 11_?3 U.i?
4 0.17 0.?4 0.27 0.4U 0.22 0.30 0.25 0.35 0.19 0.32 �
� n_i� o.zs n_a� aaz u.�� o.3s o.za n_�x o.v o.,s
I O.IR 0.2G 0.27 0.45 0.23 0.37 0.24 0.4I 0.17 Q3J '
i . I
28 Methods for Determining Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in California,Based on Data through Water Year Z006 �
�U01018f�1 811[� C.OIIC�USI00S rcgional rel�tions developed ti�r�he skew, sta�dard deviaiiun, ��
� and metm mto the LP3 eyuat�on iu Bullehn l7B(eq_ L Imer
Thi.repurt pre�eni.methuds tbr determining fiood a@ency Advi�ory Conunit[ze un Wa�er Daia. 19A2)-The final ��
iu,icniiuAe nnd Irequency at stmamsaue+tmd ungaeed stu m zquations arc lunctirnis uf drainage ama.Average standard �
l aililbrnia- Pur ihis suidy. 771 wreamgaee�s in Calilomia were erzors ol prediction tor dtese regrzssion equations range Gum
run.idcred Inr u,se in ihc region;il regm�sion aualysis. 7he 214.2 w 85G.Z percent While ihe prediction e�rui�.are large �
.iream�.ige.� aved for�hiv vn�dY have IU nr more years uFpcak- m the desert region. they ure c�naller than cumparnble zn�ur. �
tlo�v recurd that are uot sicnif�cnudy nl7ected hy regula�ion or reponed bV Thumas.wd others(1997)li�r�he Suu�hwestern
urboni�auon. I�lond-Geyuencp�catimaic,a�cerc cumpured lix�lie I Inited Statec.
s�reamp.irev hy using the cspected mumcnis algo�idmi io lit� A� l0 st�eamgages m die Sierra Nevndn.the log- ��
Yearsun�l�ype 111 d�stributio���o the Ineanihnu nl annual peak Pearson�Cype 3 (LP3)fit to all recurded penk tluws deviated '�
Ilowv Ibr each vtreamgage(Interetenev Adci.ory Cummiuee vubstantiallV from penk-Fli�w datn in the upper tnil(Inrger
on Water Dau�. I)N2). Low-oudier and hiuoric intumia�ion aunual penk flows).and a mixed-pupulatiun tlnod-Crequency
���cre incuipur:rted in�h��nal��sk.�n�i a �aneraL�cd Gn�bhs- an�lysis«�as cunsidereJ lor ihuce ure�migages Neverdieless.
Beck icv� wa,u.ed to Jwzci multiple puicnunllY inlluenti;J low the triad methods tor tiuing vep;ireue LP; curves to annual li
outlicn.�Che st;uion skew coc�7icients wcre weighted with ll�e pcnks presumablV caused by 6o�h rainfall and snowmelt and i,
gencr:di�ed akzw coe(ticicnts drvelopcd by P.ureu �nd others +i��tisticallY«��»hi��inK the separare wrves wem nut relinble.
(2b11 I li�r thc streamgnges uwside ot thc desen region of �Ilius, the LP3 cwti�es 6nsed on�he use oCall nt-.ite recorded I
Calilornit�. Por ihr streamgagev in the desen region,the station peak-llow datn were considered tu provide the bost 19ood- .,
skew cocfficicnis were weighlcd with the genernlized skew Creyu�ncy infonnn[ion al the 10 gaged sites,given the general .
coet7icicnu developed by Tltomas Und olhers(1997)-Becuuse uncertaintY:�bout mixed popululions and tlteir analysi.with
ol short paak-Ilu�v record Ieneihs and numerous�cro tlowsilow thz limited ai-�i�c data a�•ailablc-
uu�licr.(or many etreamguges iu the desen,diz ,tation nsan Aunual penA-llow da�a through wmer Year?OUG were ,
� aud.tandard dcviatiolrv alsn werc weiph�ed with a generaliud analy�eJ Ibr eigh�strenmgages in Califurnia having 10 0�
meau anel ,tnmderd deviriuon developed aciue wefghmd icast moce years of data cunsidered io be atTected by urbuniuriion.
squures regm..iun [nr the strcamgage.iu�he desert regiun. Flood-I�equency es[imatcs were cumputed ti�r the urhan
Rcziun:il rgrcs,iuu onely"�is.using uener�lized lea�i .[reamgages by Lt[in@ a Pearson�I�YPe IIl Jistri6Wiun to
.yuarc.rrgre�siun_�cas u+zd to de��elop u set uf equatiuns lugaiithms of annuul peak I3ows for each +tremngagc. Regrus-
liir e+umati�ig Ilu�v�s wiih 50-.2U-. lU-.4-.2-. I-.OS-.and sion an+ilYSis could nut be used to develop Hood-Ii�equencV
02-Verccnt annual exceeJanct probabilitios tbr une.iged cstimaiiun equudons fur ur6an streams becnuse ol lhe limited
basins in Culitbrnia ihat are out.ide of the dese�y region. num6er o(siien. Ploud-tieyuency estii�mte+ lor the ei�ht
Plood-Geyucnc��estimate.and hasin characterisiics tiir urbrn.ites wem graphicallY eumpared to fluod-1}eyuency
(„0 nir;d stre:unguges wcre combmed to ibmi ihe �inal Jaia- cstimaies for G;0 non-urban si�es.Addi�ion.I d:itii Irom urb�m
basc uticJ iu the regional regressiun analYsis. I�'ive hydrologic strznmEuges IikclY would provide�better unders�andin�ol
resionv were de��cluped for the arca of C�ilifoi�iia uutsidc uf the etl�ectv of urbnnimtion and more accornte Hi�od-freyuzncv
�he descr� regiun.The tinal zqu�iUuns are lunction,of drainaee estimates for urhan streams in Cali�iirnin.
nma. mcau basin clecauuu.and mean annunl precipitatiun for The regressinn eyueitions developed in t6is study will
the Sicrru Nev.idn�egion and liuutio��s nl drainage aren vnd be incoiporated into the U.S.Geolugicnl tiurvey(USC�S)
maan annual prceipitation li�r thr other liun'regions.Average titreamtitaU prugrum.�Phe Streamtitats p�ogrnm is a Web-
standard errors u�predicuon for ihese regression equa�iuu. based appGcation thnt provides strcaintlo�r stntistics and bn.ain
ran�c Gum d2J tu I(I.9 percem- cha�acterivtics tur(JSCiS streamgages nnd ungaued sites nf
Pur�he de�en rcgiun of Calili�mia,a sei of equn[ions in�erest. StrenmS�ats can ulso compure basin charac�eris�ics ��
tix estimatin� Ilow.with 50-.20-. l0-.4-. 2-. I-. 0.5-.and and provide estitnntes of slrenml9ow statistics li�r ungaged
02-percent�nnuul ezceednnec probabilities li�r un@aged sites when users seleet the locntion of a site aloug any stre.m
hasins was develuped hy dirzctly combining the,eparate m Caliti�rnia.
I
II
I
i
� Fee Schedule 31
,AAU ASVOCIAT4:5. IN('.
��.n�ii waNffns • �nNOSUxvEVOas .
,. ,�.. �.,e.,ra_o �_u,.m w»,c....w..ivm.o.evc«wmi,ons�
Job No. R13010 Job Name: Hospital Drive/Perkins Drainage Study Date: April 2, 2013
I PHASES BP DU -601 AO UH UP
Research Ma in H drolo H draulics
hrs/ hrs/ hrs/ hrsl hrs/
Rate/Cost cost total cost total cost total cost total cost total
Registered Civil Englneer Principal 162 1 $ 162 1 $ 162 1 $ 162 1 $ 162 2 $ 324
Senior Registered Civil Engineer 145 3 $ 435 8 $ 1,160 4 $ 580 24 $ 3,480 24 $ 3,480
Associate Civil Engineer 120 $ $ - 12 $ 1,440 $ - S -
Project Manager 102 $ $ - $ - $ - $ -
Licensed Land Surveyor 96 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Senior Environmental Planner 95 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5
Lab-Survey Manager 112 $ - $ - $ - $ - $
Staff EngineedStaff Surveyor 94 $ $ - $ - $ - $ -
Technician IV 72 $ - $ - $ $ - $ -
Technician III 66 $ $ - $ $ $ -
Technician II 54 $ - $ - S - $ - $ -
Technician I 38 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
' WaterPollutionControlManager(PW) 140 $ - $ $ - $ - $ -
QSD/QSP Specialist(non PW) 110 $ - $ - �u - $ - 5 -
Instrument Operator(PW) 104 $ $ - $ - $ - $ -
Rodman(PW) 92 $ $ - $ - � - $ -
Materials Tester(PW)(Regular) 116 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction Inspector 128 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Administration 48 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Vehicle Use(miles) 0.55 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
RTK GPS Equipment(per day) 600 $ $ - $ - $ - $
Lab Unit Prices 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Computer Hours 10 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Permit Fees 0 $ - $ - $ - $ $
Backhoe and Operator 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - � -
Outside Service Over 1,000 cost+ 5% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Outside Service Under 1,000 cost+ 15% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
BUDGET FOR PHASE O% 4 $ 597 9 $ 1,322 17 $ 2,182 25 $ 3.642 26 $ 3,804
PW= Prevailing Wages
Total Sheet 1 $ 11,547
(1) Title Report= Total Sheet 2 $ 3,804
(2) Map Checking Fees= Total Sheet 3 $ -
(3) Recording Fees= Total Sheet 4 $ -
I (4) Monuments= Reimbursables $ -
Subtotal 0 GRAND TOTAL= $15,351.00
� Worksheet Page 1
Budget Worksheet Continued Fee Schedule 31
I
Job No. R13010 Job Name: City Drainage- Hospital to Perkins Date: April 2, 2013
II PHASES �M 0 � 0 0
Re ort
hrsl hrs/ hrs/ hrs/ hrs/
Rate/Gost cost total cost total cost total cost total cost total
Registered Civil Engineer Principal 162 2 $ 324 $ - $ $ - $
Senior Registered Civil Engineer 145 24 $ 3,480 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Associate Civil Engineer 120 � - � - $ - $ $ -
Projecl Manager ��2 $ ' $ - $ $ $
Licensed Land Surveyor 96 $ - $ $ - $ - $ �
Senior Environmental Planner 95 $ ' $ - $ - $ �
Lab-Survey Manager ��Z $ - � - $ $ $
Staff Engineer/Staff Surveyor 94 $ $ " $ - $ $
Technician IV 7z $ - $ $ $ $
I Technician III 66 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
Technician II 54 $ - $ - $ $ - $
Technician I 38 $ - $ - $ - $ - �
Water Pollution Control Manager(PW) 140 $ - $ $ " $ - $ -
QSDIQSP Specialist(non PW) 110 $ - � $ ' $ - $ �
Instrument Operator(PW) 104 $ - $ - $ ' $ $ "
Rodman(PW) 92 $ - $ - $ $ $
Materials Tester(PW)(Regular) 116 $ � - $ ' $ � -
Construction Inspector 128 $ ' � - $ - $ $
Administration 4$ $ - � - $ $ $
Vehicle Use(miles) 0.55 $ - � - $ $ - $ -
RTK GPS Equipment(per day) 600 $ - $ ' $ ' $ - $ -
I Lab Unit Prices � $ " $ - $ $ $
Computer Hours 10 $ - $ $ - $ $
I Permit Fees �
Other 100 $ - � - $ - $ - $ -
� Outside Service Over 1,000 cost+ 5% $ - $ - $ - $ " $ -
Outside Service Under 1,000 cost+ 15% $ - $ - $ ' $ - $ -
Reimbursables $2,590 0% $ - $ ' $ - $ - $
BUDGET FOR PHASE 26 $ 3,804 0 $ - 0 $ 0 $ 0 $
Total This Sheet $ 3,804
Worksheet Page 2