HomeMy WebLinkAbout03142013 - packet City of Ukiah
Design Review Board
Agenda
Thursday March 14, 2013 3:00 P.M.
Conference Room # 5
The Design Review Board encourages applicants and/or their representatives to be available at the meeting to
answer questions so that no agenda item need be deferred to a later date due to a lack of pertinent information.
1. CALL TO ORDER: UKIAH CIVIC CENTER, CONFERENCE ROOM #5
300 SEMINARY AVENUE, UKIAH
2. ROLL CALL: Members Liden, Thayer, Hise, Nicholson, Hawkes
3. CORRESPONDENCE: None.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes from February 14, 2013 are included for review and approval.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS: The City of Ukiah Design Review Board welcomes
input from the audience. In order to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person
and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be
taken on audience comments.
6. OLD BUSINESS:
A. Outdoor Dining Structure Program for powntown Ukiah. Continue review and make
recommendations on draft guidelines for the Outdoor Dining Structure Program.
7. MATTERS FROM THE BOARD:
8. MATTERS FROM STAFF:
9 . SET NEXT MEETING: April 11, 2013
10. ADJOURNMENT:
The City of Ukiah complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate
individuals with disabilities upon request. If possible, please contact the City of Ukiah (707) 463-
6200 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting time.
��ty � u�iah City of Ukiah, CA
Design Review Board
1 MINUTES
2
3 Regular Meeting February 14, 2013
4
5 Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue
6 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Hise called the Design Review Board meeting to order at 3:00
7 p.m.
8
9 2. ROLL CALL Present: Tom Liden, Howie Hawkes,
10 Tom Hise, Chair
11 Absent: Alan Nicholson, Nick Thayer
12 Staff Present: Kim Jordan, Senior Planner
13 Jennifer Faso, Associate Planner
14 Cathy Elawadly, Recording Secretary
15 Others present: Charles Ackerley
16 Deborah Ganz
17 Freedom Smith
18
19 3. CORRESPONDENCE: None
20
21 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: - December 8, 2011 &October 11, 2012
22 M/S Liden/Hawkes to approve the December 8, 2011 and October 11, 2012 minutes, as
23 submitted. Motion carried (3-0)with Members Nicholson and Thayer absent.
24
25 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
26
27 6. NEW BUSINESS:
28 6A. Preliminary Review Ukiah Valley Medical Center — Hospital Support Building (File
29 No. 13-03-PRE-DRB) Design review pre-application review of new a Hospital Support
30 Building. 275 Hospital Drive, APN 002-160-08.
31
32 Senior Planner Jordan:
33 • Gave a staff report and noted the Support building is a standalone application. The DRB
34 is being asked to make design comments concerning this project.
35 • Provided the DRB with a copy of project comments from Member Nicholson. These
36 comments will be incorporated into the minutes as attachment 1.
37 • Introduced Charles Ackerley, Jennings Ackerley Architecture and Design.
38
39 Deborah Ganz, Adventist Health: While the Hospital Expansion Project has been approved by
40 the Planning Commission, the hospital is reevaluating the campus for ways to improve and
41 provide for a more uniform/cohesive layout such that the design/color pallete/materials/treatments
42 are well coordinated so the presentation of the buildings/other structures/landscaping provide for
43 a more welcoming/patient/pedestrian friendly environment.
44
45 The Support building is not an OSPD project.
46
47 Charles Ackerley, Architect: referred to the site plan for the proposed new Support building:
48 • The Support building is currently being designed. While there is no formal design at this
49 point, is asking the DRB for comments related only to the Support Building that would be
50 located in the rear of the hospital campus. The intent is to improve the functionality and
51 aesthetics of the other buildings/structures/existing roadway in the same location.
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 1
1 • Acknowledged the hospital is also reevaluating the campus layout and/or master plan as
2 to how the hospital functions and is exploring options to make for a more
3 balanced/harmonious/better functioning/attractive and more engaging environment for
4 hospital patients and their families, visitors and hospital staff.
5 • Likes having a primary service entrance, designated parking areas and connected
6 pedestrian/public corridors from building to building that help unify and more clearly
7 define the campus and the various functions as opposed to a somewhat hodge-podge
8 design layout.
9 • Is of the opinion the hospital complex has more of factory/industrial look. There is a need
10 to make the hospital campus cohesive in a way that the buildings and connections to the
11 buildings, parking area, entrance, and landscaping are more clearly defined, accessible,
12 inviting and friendly. Consideration will be given to overall circulation on the site as it
13 relates to parking and access that may include possible infrastructure improvements.
14 • Preservation of patient privacy and providing comfort are examples of highly important
15 components to consider that can be accomplished with appropriate landscaping and
16 nicely designed buildings with treatments that can provide privacy and comfort.
17 • UVMC would like to have the new Support Building completed by the end of this year.
18 • The Support Building is approximately 12,000 square feet and two-stories.
19 • The new support building is not directly associated with patient care.
20 • Commented on the functions of the buildings at the rear of the site which include
21 receiving, material/product storage, medical equipment storage, repair area and
22 linen/laundry and are essentially the `heartbeaY of the hospital. These uses are currently
23 scattered throughout the rear of the site and could be more efficiently arranged to serve
24 the hospital. Many of these functions could be located in the Support Building. The rear
25 of the site also has containers, an emergency generator and a collage of other things.
26 The intent is to analyze these functions and make improvements as the hospital develops
27 and grows.
28 • The proposed Storage building will feature office space on the second floor.
29 • Understands the building would need to be reconfigured and moved forward because a
30 two-story building is not allowed in the B2 Airport Compatibility Zone without Mendocino
31 County Airport Land Use Commission review and approval.
32
33 Staff: Confirmed that a determination would have to be made by the Mendocino County Airport
34 Land Use Commission that a two-story is consistent with the B2 infill compatibility criteria.
35
36 DRB:
37 • Questioned plans concerning the roadway that dead ends at the back of Home Depot
38 and finds this to be a very odd situation.
39 • Asked if plans include opening up the corridor on the back side of the hospital facility to
40 accommodate trucks and other vehicles where the storage facilities/repair areas are
41 located.
42 • Asked about the modular structures that were located near the physical therapy building.
43 • There was discussion about the parking on the site, particularly plans concerning the
44 temporary/permanent parking lot on the northwest side of the campus.
45 • Questioned if the DRB is being asked to look at the design concept for the Support
46 building whether attention is also to be directed as to how this fits into the grand scheme
47 of plans for the hospital campus.
48 • Likes the concept of the Support building, but is really unable to comment on the design
49 aspects because there is no design being proposed at this time.
50 • Rather than provide direction preference would like to understand the intent of the
51 project.
52
53 Staff:
54 • It just happens to be that Hospital Drive ends at the back side of Home Depot.
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 2
1 • It may very well be the Support building is the beginning of the bigger picture for the
2 hospital campus and while consideration is being given to the overall design of the
3 campus there is only one application and this is for the Support building.
4 • The "overflow" parking lot currently being used by the hospital would be replaced by the
5 permanent parking lot approved as part of the Hospital Expansion project. The overflow
6 parking lot is allowed to be used during construction of the approved Expansion Project
7 and would likely need to be used during construction of the Support Building for parking
8 and construction staging. When the permanent parking lot is built, the overflow lot can no
9 longer be used.
10 • Requests the DRB provide direction to the applicant that can be used for the preparation
11 of the formal application. Design style that is preferred or not, site design concerns, etc.
12 • Need to be clear that the applicant is not required to and provide a "Master Plan" of the
13 hospital campus as part of the Support Building Application.
14
15 Charles Ackerley: There is an access driveway from E. Perkins Street where the physical
16 therapy building is located that goes along the back side of hospital facility where the support
17 buildings are located.
18
19 Freedom Smith, Ukiah Valley Medical Center: The modular structures have been merged into
20 the job site.
21
22 DRB comments related to the design of the new Support building:
23 • Agrees with Member Nicholson's Project comments.
24 • Project should be people centered.
25 • Provide for outdoor space for employees and visitors. People should be able to have a
26 connection with the outdoors. The outdoor space could be covered.
27 • Provide good landscaping.
28 • Provide energy efficient components, possibly green-walls, address heat island effect of
29 west facing windows.
30 • Provide for nice color pallete.
31 • Do not mimic design of hospital/Birth Center. Design for the Support building would not
32 really be meaningful without full concept of the master plan for the hospital campus and
33 how the design of other buildings architecturally ties in with one another.
34 • Recommend relocating the two-story part of the building to be outside of the B2 Airport
35 Compatibility Zone to avoid going to the Airport Land Use Commission. Going to the
36 ALUC is uncertain and would delay the project.
37 • Focus on providing adequate pedestrian and bicycle access to all buildings and provide
38 adequate pedestrian circulation and bicycle parking. Bike and pedestrian issues are
39 important to our community.
40 • Make certain the backside of the hospital has adequate pedestrian and bicycle access.
41 • The generator facility is in an unsuitable location.
42 • The backend of the campus is unorganized and needs to be improved.
43 • Likes the design and welcoming feel of the `Pavilion' building.
44 • Does not need to see the master plan for the site as it relates to the architecture as part
45 of the formal application for the Support building.
46
47 Deborah Ganz: Emergency funding has been received to replace and possibly relocate the
48 emergency generator.
49
50 Charles Ackerley: Will provide colors and materials from the "master palette" for the hospital
51 campus for the formal application for the Support Building. This would be the "palette" that is
52 intended to be used throughout the hospital campus over time which will be based on a design
53 that fits with Ukiah and/or Mendocino County image and the fact that the Project is a hospital. A
54 "Master Plan" for development of the hospital campus will not be provided as part of the Support
55 Building application.
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 3
1 7. MATTERS FROM THE BOARD: None
2
3 8. MATTERS FROM STAFF
4 8A. Outdoor Dining Structure Program for powntown Ukiah. Request for Design Review
5 Board recommendations regarding design and materials for outdoor dining structures.
6
7 Shannon Riley, City Project and Program Analyst:
8 • City Council authorized staff to develop an Outdoor Dining Structure Program for
9 Downtown Ukiah.
10 • The Program is modeled after the successful pilot project at Patrona and will extend to
11 eligible restaurants in the Downtown core.
12 • Program guidelines are being developed.
13 • Intent is to avoid `cookie-cutter' appearance and allow for businesses to personalize their
14 outdoor dining structures as much as possible within the Program guidelines in
15 compliance with City safety and design standards/encroachment regulations, etc.
16 • Would like DRB input regarding fencing, floor surface, furnishing standards
17 (tables/chair/umbrellas and umbrella stands/lighting/portable heaters/trash
18 receptacles/other decorative items).
19 • Provided examples of outdoor dining structures used in San Francisco and Long Beach
20 and asked for the DRB to comment and make recommendations thereof(See attachment
21 2). Noted the difference between the Parklet in San Francisco and the program the City is
22 proposing is that the Parklets are truly public parks even though they are typically located
23 near a restaurant and can be used by anyone.
24 • Also provided are materials/product specifications from Bison (See attachments 3, 4 &5).
25 • The outdoor dining structures in Ukiah will basically be the property of the restaurant
26 which would be responsible for maintenance, providing insurance, and for compliance
27 with all City rules/regulations.
28 • Asked the DRB to review the draft Program and make recommendation.
29 • A number of city jurisdictions limit large tables in outdoor dining. (No bigger than a four-
30 top)
31 • With regard to the Parklet bottom right (see attachment 2), would think there would be
32 some kind of small barrier on the back of the wooden bar/table so food/dishes and the
33 like do not fall into the street.
34 • Related to tables and chairs, plastic or resin chains are prohibited. Such chairs get`grimy'
35 and are light weight so they tend to get blown around. Some cities suggest specific
36 materials for chairs, such as wrought iron, fabricated steel, etc.
37
38 DRB comments regarding Parklet examples from San Francisco and Long Beach
39 (attachment 2):
40 • Questioned the design related to the outdoor dining example with the barrels. The design
41 appears to be `choppy.'
42 • Do not like the row 2, left side example (see attachment 2)which looks like a corral.
43 • Likes the outdoor dining structure on the bottom left of the examples. The materials
44 appear to be `Bison' and the design is pleasing/welcoming and less cluttered than some
45 of the other examples. Likes the use of landscaping in this example provides green space
46 and a barrier between the street and outdoor dining area.
47 • The design and choice of materials/accessory decor relative to the outdoor dining
48 structure example bottom right is interesting. The barrier can act as a table and people
49 sitting on the stool seats can look at traffic while eating. The sidewalk extends outward,
50 the design is simplistic yet very appealing/inviting.
51 • Outdoor dining structures should be level and supported as the floor transitions from
52 sidewalk to structure. Member Liden cited an example in Virginia where brick and sand
53 are used. The transition between the sidewalk and outdoor dining was nicely achieved
54 and highly pleasing aesthetically.
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 4
1 • Member Liden supports allowing florescent colors for umbrellas, rather than prohibiting
2 them. They can be used well.
3 • Height of railing should be no more than 36 inches.
4 • Presentation is important.
5 • Structures should not appear or be cluttered for safety/privacy/aesthetic purposes.
6 • Materials and surfaces used should have the ability to be power-washed.
7 • Use of redwood for the floor of the structure is not a good idea because it can be slippery
8 in the winter.
9 • Important to extend the sidewalk outward.
10 • Provide for some type of railing system for outdoor dining structure.
11 • Landscaping should be encouraged. Planters are okay and can be effective a
12 barrier/separation between the structure and the street.
13 • Make sure there is some way to maintain underside of structures in order to remove
14 debris/garbage which can accumulate under decks and create unpleasant odors/smells.
15 • Likes the brick and sand approach. There is an advantage to having a permeable
16 surface. Also, this would prevent debris from getting under the surface and creating
17 odors.
18 • Likes the concept of having 'patio-type surfaces.' Could be brick, tile, or other types of
19 materials used for patios.
20 • Structures should be ADA accessible and need to have a foundation.
21 • Platform structures are okay provided they are level with the sidewalk with a smooth
22 transition from sidewalk to outdoor dining area.
23
24 There was discussion concerning surfacing using sand and the technique used.
25
26 Chair Hise:
27 • Supports having guidelines with basic concepts because some people will want to do
28 more and others less. Some people may only want tables, others tables with planters,
29 and others may want a well-defined structure and take a more architectural approach.
30 Guidelines are necessary to steer way from `anything goes' kind of design and to prevent
31 clutter.
32 • Has seen patio work done with sand and square pavers that are very effective and
33 provides for a nice appearance. This technique is actually less costly than concrete. Is
34 familiar with mixing sand with cement and this too is an effective technique.
35 • Wood decking and railing is expensive and is not typically durable. There are
36 prefabricated materials available that are longer lasting.
37 • With the right design, benches would be acceptable. Benches function great as boarders.
38 • European Cafe themes are well-known for using small cafe tables. The reason large
39 tables are likely prohibited is to be able to seat a small number of people like European
40 cafe's do. Restaurants that have a sideyard typically have larger tables for outdoor
41 dining.
42
43 DRB: While Patrona's outdoor dining structure looks good, it is not level with the sidewalk. It is a
44 platForm.
45
46 Member Liden:
47 • Referencing Patron, one does not expect to have a `deck' on an asphalt surface where
48 people park their cars. The structure is not level with the sidewalk.
49 • Likes most of the design concepts in the examples of outdoor dining structures featured
50 in attachment 2.
51
52 DRB comments regarding Bison products and material brochure (attachments 3, 4 & 5)
53 • Provides nice examples of patio surfacing. Sees that Bison provides prefabricated
54 concrete and stone surfacing materials of different design and character.
55
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 5
1 DRB comments:
2 • Likes the concept of outdoor dining. Patrona outdoor dining was a nice addition to the
3 Downtown.
4 • Would like to see other outdoor dining establishments in the Downtown.
5 • The design examples would be useful for the Program because the outdoor dining
6 structures need to be attractive. The examples of outdoor dining structures could act as
7 design guidelines that provide ideas and samples of materials that could be used. Do not
8 like the "corral" with trellising or the barrel with tree in attachment 2. Likes the idea of
9 trees and landscaping, but the barrel in the middle of the barrier/railing is odd.
10 • Structure should provide for a happy medium between being able to relate to pedestrian
11 activity on the sidewalk and having the sense of being safe and separated from the street
12 because this represents the fun of eating on the sidewalk.
13 • Inquired about how the Program would work and what would be the boundaries? Could
14 someone do an outdoor dining project on Perkins Street?
15 • While the program should have guidelines and standards for compliance, creativity
16 should be encouraged.
17
18 Staff:
19 • There would be a standard package that people can choose from. If someone wants to
20 do something different than the standard package, the DRB can review the project.
21 • While neon colors would not likely be a good choice and hence prohibited, it could be
22 such colors would be appropriate for a project. The DRB would be able to make this
23 determination.
24 • While the program boundaries have not been determined, they will likely be limited to the
25 Downtown core, primarily because unlike other areas this area does not already have
26 onsite areas to accommodate outdoor dining and can only use the sidewalk or other
27 right-of-way for this.
28 • Perkins Street outside of the downtown would not be included in the Program
29 boundaries.
30
31 Chair Hise asked about the requirements for a barrier.
32
33 Staff:
34 • The matter of barriers is being looked at as they relate to safety, ABC requirements
35 and/or other city/public right-of-way/encroachment requirements.
36 • Does the DRB want to consider planters as fencing?
37
38 DRB: Encourage planters as fencing.
39
40 Floor Surface
41 Open to different techniques; Likes materials from Bison. Most effective if sidewalk is extended
42 and make certain all surfacing is level with the sidewalk.
43
44 Would like to see a variation in surfacing materials. Does not want to necessarily see all brick.
45
46 Furnishinq Standards
47
48 Tables &Chairs
49 • Are necessary provided they are maintained, safe for persons. Plastic chairs should be
50 allowed provided they have some architectural design where the plastic is mixed with
51 stainless steel and/or the like.
52 • Metal tables and chairs look nice. Cautioned though some metal tables and chairs can
53 get too hot in the afternoon sun. Table cloths would be an option.
54
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 6
1 • Likes staff's recommendations concerning materials permitted on page 2 of the staff
2 report.
3 • Agrees all plastic or resin tables and chairs should be prohibited.
4
5 Member Liden: Supports considering florescent colors rather than prohibiting. They can be
6 very attractive if used in the right context. Also okay with stripes and patterns.
7
8 Staff: Design concepts and colors for outdoor dining should not be distracting.
9
10 Umbrellas & Umbrella Stands
11 • Should be encouraged. They also provide shade.
12
13 Lighting
14 Member Liden likes the concept of kerosene lamps.
15
16 Staff:
17 • Kerosene lamps would likely be a fire hazard since portable heaters are allowed.
18 • The City has specific requirements regarding lighting.
19
20 DRB: Likes staff's recommendation regarding lighting as provided for on page 2 of the staff
21 report.
22
23 Portable Heaters
24 • Good idea.
25
26 Trash Receptades
27 • All outdoor dining establishments must be kept clean. City staff is discussing the
28 technical aspects of this.
29
30 Other Decorative Items
31 • Awnings provide for a nice accent provided they do not extend into the public right-of-
32 way.
33
34 9. SET NEXT MEETING/ADJOURNMENT
35 The next meeting will be Thursday, March 14, 2013. The meeting adjourned at 5:11 p.m.
36
37
38 Cathy Elawadly, Recording Secretary
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 7
. �;i;7+;hR73rli�`. � .
kd��entist Health Center,Campus Addition ������
Preliminary Reuiew of�a Llldat�Nalley h,9edical Center Hospliai 9uppart du
Ciry of LJkiah,�esign H�eui Carimi�t�0 �
Februaryl2,2(}13 F�$ � ���ij
CA'I OF�N1
In ravlawing the requeat far design review I have saa7e general thouphts a��e�esFgn��
apprnach,ab xvell ae a few epecific respanses fo the propasal,
J•w an inlroduction I rc#or yau to a lott�r I comp�ad in 2�07 es e rgspphag ta a propoaal for an
addltlon and remadol to Nr�grr,gr�gncy antr�nce area on the Weet eide o-f the e�osting Critical
Cere unik,ANhou�h it was written far a drfTerant building proposal,it is stil relevank ta the eurranP
praposal,
In r�avfawing thls proposal,I cvuldn'f help laaking for eame car�text,as the form and rnassing af
the nen�8:�ppart 6ui�ng has no rela6anship ta the neighborhaod orthe existing campus.So I
laaked at II7e Adveititist Health Cenfer purpaae and meaninp irmn Iheir weloslte:
''I+YC}SrY1vi[ki SylrStua��3ry
Nuspr�a�rza�rc�r.�Ut�rr J�ririy fse�'�gs vlfear,he�pless��ess end v�rh�e�abilrly.lJkrah'dAf+cy iL<edlea!
Center is c�nTmrtted�o carinp fvr�`ac iv��oio person arrrJ emphas+zes car�for�e s}a1.7tr�a�
r�eeds ofpatiorrfs andfamuf�s.Uurgna�7s kt e.�eale a hr�af�ng erru�mnmKrn�,�+s�wfx1 irt aur
r�afsal�r�s[aiement.
PaiJerlt 7�xrrs{f}ur�L4�sslnn Stat�menf)
V�a rriRar�1 Gnd'slnur,s fa oirr ro�nm��r�rty by pmvi:lirrgphysrraJ.merrtal s��d spinhra+1ao�fti�g.
fmpN�yea Fnc�is
V�e scriuE tc prnvkio cvory foam.merr�ber�,v;Nr p�rause+�l,wOrlfirfh,JB krcuk&n(i#q hgJ�#hern
r�cognlze t�re.xntr�rt�.ari�ne}mafra,�,�snn9kf.
[:currniunrty�nc+,u _. _
�e ,
4urRaNyir�Q Cry
A feam That Ca+ss,�4 J44ss1on 7�ia[�+Paftars.'
Doaa the netiv 6uilding respond fo any af ihese goals?
A responsivc heahltcarc campus deslgn oedklpn muat�at pnly addrg5$�he cfia�ler�ges v{
evolwng:ochnalogles arxl s�staln�l�IQ lif��y�le ooe#a,duy alao the human elemer�#al
h�althcara,hlending be�hnica�design innovalionswikh the healing emiironmerrt. Joining
opara#ional e�ficiency and capikal cast�noerns witl�evidanoe-based healthcare design.In a
aucoessful healkh oare plart,:he architectur�of both the sMrvices deli+rered anC the buflding K�rk
in harrnony.
'1 he Adven€ist h�edical Center haa anoth�r opport.�nity h�re and ncwto unify it3 oampus and
become a madel caporate cifizen far Ihe City of Ukiah,
The starting poin'may be a unlflad color palaie.Cclnr can hdve�p�ofaund psychulu�ical and
physlologlcal Impact on humana and�hg Lui�t envirarn���t.C�I�r arxl arch�tecture go hand in
h�nd,Cplc�r is#he lar�guasae vf fwm,and is aiso the language vf emo#ions.7hrough extariar
ovlvr we infl4rance cur tawnscape and interaot wi�o-ur sv�raundings by tvay of cul6ural
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 8
associa�ns�airyd:t��.,emotlunsl ass�clatio-�s af onlor.C,drive down Hospltal�rvE Is an
�xpar�ncaJrti ar�]71t�Jura!confuslon and a�7 incni7erent�7lerarchy of camp�s'plennlny.
Sameane tried(a�do scme[hing ri�ht rrith 9he Oukpatiant Clinio;the 6uilding has a strong
presenea�uiih fhe massing brn;cen up in interesling and understandahle relatiQnships and oolor
harmony.I�.urefeo:nes you and has a dcaflnabl8 franl door.Hativevor It stands alone.The rest of
the car�pu's Is,�yn�ntelllgl6Ea functlonallsm.1'f�e aurrer�t prc�pusal relnfaro3sthe lack af any
coharent ma�ter plannin�.
Falla�ving are some speoific suggestivns for im.proving the proposed 8upport Building,
1.Provide pedestrian dulb-vu�at all crvssmalks 6o enhance p�estrian safaiy and promote�
more v�alka6le ci[y. �
2.Provide real pedestrlan shadiitg and wet weatl�er proieetian af entry arcade ra[her than an
abstraeted menpha�.
3.Tho east elevatlon Is an u�de�eveloped Idea and off�nsh+e frelght�ading doek udth nn
prelpnse nf r.o$pnirx�ifirrugh scal�,masKing;buiking dptalls dr lan�SSCaping.P�th6na the
tivall in fmnt could ha4e some horizontal relafianship tn Ihe north fa�,ade inscead of heing
an ai6erG�ought The entr3r alor�the tvest fa�de vrill be an ine�cient ai7argy drain snd on
the exterlor,a seasanable pedasuian su[faranae.The nonh streatfapad�Is assumed tp
he a singl�dark riunon tiv�r,dovr tftie I�rtigtn a#the b�ildfng with na n�mari�ng�emer,t-
a_ i ne eunding msssing is n�and and mey tit in e eueuroan eusiness park ar nigntvsy
industria!zo-ne.Ik relies on high parto•manae glaaing end has na rela5onship#o ib
ernrironrnent or the ciiy of Ukiah des�n guidelnes ar his6orical character.It has na .
re�ationship to any oF iks neighfoors or na�hborhood,and creates furth�r discord amongst
ks archR�ctural nel�hoors.
5.'ARhough ih�presentstian is very preliminery;thera Is a glaring di�regard fpr Ihe sareening
aFthe wehide serrice areae.A chair link fence along the eaatem bar�er daee nat create a
- -IT�I __....
B.There are dher strategies far 6uilding design beyand Ihe cladding oF a'Stacking and
Program�iagram°.Perhaps the design team cauld move be fand the praprarr�ing and
schoma�c phasa and fnto deslgn development heforfl more prosenta�lons.
7_ Pravldc a praposal for a cohcront colar palata program.
Reapeckfully,
t
Alan Nidioisan,Assaciate AIA
2
1
2
3
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 9
_..._ ...:.. ..:.... ��������
F�6 �S�D'�3
i Goud 6uildings Make[#vod Neightrora
� Cyl'I��
1lAHq��
Novr is tha tima,to conslder!he hdaGng powgr oF architectur�e,Jusl hmv muoh dif`erancc
ean archltact�re maka ta health?
Thare i�nolhing netiv in the idea th�t arohitechare can 6c arrald ta hoaling.Hls�rloal{y,
hospital buildings have played art importarrt talc In daflnlr�g a city,9n gKpfg$alOfl 4I
philarrthmpic ideals,v�lt�y patrons and emplaying arGhikac#ure and design 6o inspira
patients,staff end tho comm�nl�y;to b6 good neighbvra,
Ho:;�,ltals arQ w���G�lebrate oir masC iri#imate and tauching ksut also our mast
ha�rowing and emational maments.They should be arnong the mast Importank and
prvfaundly symboic spacas we I�habk yat Insfaad they are IargeFy the resuli af dirn
dcireauerailc daclslona,penny-pinchinR�u�questioned orihadoxy and,at best,average
� plannin9 snd architecture,
Hox�aan alchi�ecture aanfribufe io healing?-Nnuradays,large hul{�i�7g�gucf,da h�pitals
I 8fB Y£qlllf2d IO flllflll 2 C011Y�I�X 21Y1dIy3ii1[fI pf�y�I4dI:81C5If1�IIC,sooial and symbolic .
fur.ctlons.�Inding w�y�tu vp#irnir�Sheae functions is a major chGllenge lor modem
� a��:hiitcw�ture,9efore ever thinking a�out tix�haL a projeeturlll aven[ually faok Ilke,ihe
� arehiteet has to identiPl the in#anded luncticns af tl�e proJect and Hs farrtprlr�t.
' Too many archRec[s thlnk that great�eslgn onmea fmm�rent programming.The3+thri4�
ion data,slx�s,ecanomlr.�.e.nria5,gnd r,fient rinvQn business models.Then at the end,
thay qulckly dr�oraie their program,treating the artistic skills of our professlon wl�h very
- �iltle-ur^derstandirtg�uf�the�rodcictfiails�r�the-enr�bacaus�th�-das nern��#um� -
everyt mg ey o inro an o �e nra sc ence nas an bu�inQ�g v��ue.Creativiky and
innovatian_an tlre other hand:ar�auqjecki++e placesaes that da�not vperate in this
renuctlonlst manner.
�nuGh da#ailed research hes been dvne an Iha tvorkFlaca arrvironmant;on tha affacls pf
archikeckUre on staff,on pertorinance and oiti praft.In every inetanc�studigs shpvr that
workers res�ond positivaly io Insp�ring archllectura and Ehat as a direct coneequence,
Ihayfaal happler are haalU�lar,ar�ahlsta work hsrder and mare praduc€iuely.As a
� result,profits Inqre9se,
I
The design af hospitals on tl�e other hand,whieh ara unlq�e and complax structures
oompared wi[h euen the most sophls[lea[ad buslness nf�r�,Is tfr.Sng Iz�ta design-huild
corrtrackors,wl[h archltec[s reduce�ta Impotar�t mr.rnbers of a lar�ger priva#e finance
consortlum.�uaIIP�In arr.hllecturaf deaipn ia pi�she�fo the periphery if at all. Where it
appaars,It Is usad Kparinflfy in the design of atria,labbies:or in tha treatment of an
iROlated fa�ade,a pure[y casmetic exercise.
7he argument against decent publle archPEac�urrm Is ar�a of�st.It i6 tr:�e that hvspital
buildings aro hugaly axpgnaive to conatruct,far mare sn than offioes,ho�iitig ot even
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 10
I , �
� . . . ' r::s.��� .
. Illkilly ho[019:.Eiui[Ilc;y�YU dv&r inuld Slayyuiinoly ex}�xnsive{�flJll.HU'!��'��iITIR�ed
with iha da�-�o�iay cobis of�unniny a f�r�bpit�l:#hi�c�pital exNenditure is#rifling,yek ik is
at th�btag�,ard ihis s�ge onl�,that the ap�rtunity erises#a do samething anduringFy
tvaitflvrhil�•rnth the buildirxg itself.Persvnnel and apera5ng coet�ara999fi or mcreaFa
bu:l�irt�s cost.so tha[desipn axoellenca becomes 1he most valuah�e yel Inslgnlibcan[
cost In tha Ilfe of a bu�lding..
If any hull�ings desproa th�kill allerrtim of erchi�cts,prnduct-d�i�ners and�.rtis�.a,
ihFn thn�buildin�y arw hnapitals,w�ich shauld be amnng the finest,mosf thoughtfu[
and mastaffecfinp and haaling sp�ces ure encountar.In hospitals,k�oth�he sickand
their relafi4es�re af their most vulnara�Eo;puttina�tam in�uildings that are at hest
�land anrJ il�considered,at vrorst ugly ar�d actualh�narmful.'i nis is�r�r cn�na7[o get
�f�em rlgrn.
Vnfor#unakely far U�e avmmunities that HBE{Hospi9al 9uilding&Equipment C�npany}
pmvides design r build health eare f�cilities;design�xcallenca and L�a coneap'of
creating a batter eommuniiy Is not parl of the program.The current bulldlnp proposad for
[he Clly of Uklah can�ot he distinguishad hgEwean an auto bpdy repair ehop,a atrip mall
or a Ludgbt rpadeide matel,
As the HBE Missian Statemeirt pro-udP�announ�s,"our onfirc process is strudured t�
dclit�er tho mnst valuc for your das�gn".The essartlal Icay m H,elr mission is prnviding
law enst st�ua[,,res_S❑much ao the#lhe pvesibili�y 4(anduring mativated deeign ar
�ye;ng�go-ad neighbor in building s missing from the cornpany aulkure.
Also unfortuna6e is fhat U�e pmposed building.is che face of the Adue�ist HeaRh Cara in
Uliiah.This is a rare apportunl[y for4he p�llc axpresslon of fhelr bNlsfs and a chahca to
make a statemarrt of�haallhy,heeli�g qualily al lifa in tha cammunity,Gaad buildings
do ma �� rd eooTiEors. �� ��
Alan Wicholson
June 7,2�J11
1 �
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 11
----- - -- 'i'.".. . � . .
i ,
� r ec���' : . ' .
,..� ` � a �: .. . , � �
_.- ��� � . � :.��.
�5.' �.
, I _ 4 ��
- � ..�� �_ �.. .. �I - - � .
- _..r �x--
- r x:�•:..-. .. '- . _�� ' .
�'� ' ��s-�-=• - -__-_ _ • . .�.. � �
--� �N . ..:a..:� :.. . _
i - -
" .°.e�kYi'ryyp'.
r5'�l n .. . . .,
_ :� �,' � _ —
. . i: , _ .... �:�.� _:�'�
ti: � .� ' ' ' � --_
- - t��� S� �'�', :?��.,�4 w _ ' _-_.� "�_,
:,l`� F: _ _ ,
- -. . - , _ ; • , .� -
.�-� -.-- ' • �i ' ---
- .. --, _, - '.:��,
..�
°�§�...� . - �'. . : : +I.,rc�. r
�� :E ��•i����!�^�i. � 4=
� � . � ��s��::` ° `i
.'+ ,3 ,� �.` � k;' . . ��6 f�.
�;;�'y
�� ��.
- �.�::::�� �. :�� w{�����.� ,� .. . �
`�:;- _ � 3;" -,- _ ��_`i�' `i , --
. �- ��.�•. .. ' . . . _ • �
''I.T. �',�. 1" , . . - _� _ -.. _ .
. ��� }:...� . - . . ' '. ' '�... '.
' ' _ r..F,., . ��!��~.•:� -
': - . � :,`�?,� ' � .i-d�'Y �Ji �� 4 .
. -•'�:�i_` . ,.,
� � ���. .���:.��_A�.�.�-:.:
_ �•.� --:: - ,/�'rr ' .:�n _ '.='
: -� " - .��' ' . . - . _ :..:.5,°: :.'.::�.::
' �:� - -',�.k. '.:_ r . � ... - ' '-x
;�...
_ =:y:'�. �'��. _ �`. . • . .-" ,'�'�v''�°.3;.
"s:<. ..;�c ' ;'`L... . . - _� �_: •
x�:�:,:. - :r:s'. • - .a� �` ���
•
1
� - . : . . . - . i
• �, . -
.,�t
� �I� l�I�II � �
, Yx._ �,. _, .-: - .,� -..� � ���` 1 i
-::�_-- - ____.i
� --- ,.
_ �.
P�rklet in Three Di�tgonal
Parking Spaces [San Francisca�
----,o ::�.�
�� -- I � , '��
! � ... ' ..._.._
; �._ — '��1
s � - �°
-�r—
o.��o.,�.cx o.xx.�.wn x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 13
� Rnnitepllccic.6isouip P�g�1 ni 3
f.i�.,.�.�;_17';x
6Lf41q � e �
r�
�.� , .,....,..- .. _
i
Nhnf iif[:K yJpppR15 WOQll1ILE5 1'LA1fTE0.5r9EfH41� P11P-Yp MnkK yREEf7 RPOF lSORE INFO
...�4 .. Sl2r[MCks
eFi. � �al�;:�
-��r+rr -<�'�-
avtize a=rcci
ah'.m,au.i..�.��-_- i 6 ynN POP-lln PARIfC� I
J�n s e�Ji_rs-:::rh�n r'rrs.:��
� h�L]n:a R'.i.li..^.:.on:N hn.i. .
Kr:J'§'n- .��.i�F.<b:s'n.���.�✓...=i
�;.et�"i-ert.':I k^W Ilc^l�x ax �
x.l�.v���s�i niliil.a
_�an:lrrr 1 i-.1.��!t.v'':d�:xa�.�u
't���:J'4'Kai:rr:s:.Gr s1.:c�'.`tit rG.
�_i�:enac r.r�:ea,�-r.r..r.:r rr.�-�m
I -,-i�rn�.,���nrn_.,�.i-.-�..�w�i:�..:.�n -
, rr2;rny�.naxr�ny�
ercs.ein�-�xn ivrn:'e•:..�
I ;�rccr.a.t:..�•r.,i,��n�,-r:�..�:.�i
. . ..•o��,�i
.r��k��r-,ricacnvrrcc_r>src.
' _ _— __}. iy Nf..'L•Et.Sx[rc1.Yrvo..A���i—L:�
I
, a..�+- x�•4xe w•kx[e•'.n
.rcMSS e bc�f.F!I�.rCS•v.r F-i.:r;i:�i!
T�i.:Jfin.l=i�i�a':
- .. u.l���e'f'I���k'si�l�i'c
Iii��J�_c4viieL�'.
�. .� •Yy:m[��['.e1,-I'e:77'.x•:�i1:E[v.i
n.�i��.
� .e'su4ist Encn 5:'x.[-k� iw i�.i-i..ii �i r. .�:�i��i�...r.: .
st Y-fM1'� � �:�Ili ln:x�.t=
I L �.
i �
i
I [arr.,ln�rs,e-n.�rn M.:�ca�Y����,��:�����k.J�.ik eisrn Nx+�e NerE
x i ier�T P[4NS
Ixi�l� .vYef•kl-Vrc'eGYZI�FUI ..
X]'.T.`l�I rl�I[',11Jry:�'i seii I'r�ve':s Ya.exstm�aMs
htc p�t.'wsew.h is�»�ip.w�i7�fst��exi 17r�kr..lr1�1F 4!x[ir2i}i 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 14
Rn�,l'k,p�c:1c.b13011i�7 Pt�gc�oP a
I � �ITE'M� ,riL•:3z4RY IF:•.
� Yil'f+�.+w:LIIY
I :.'?'i i�I yir�l:.:i'.n�o�
�'NI kaSN..
=x iey`.
ra:M'rr.x�-rr n1�.i�n'a�.
w��.^n+:i:• o�vx�r-ami>>n xvcs crse x�{�,ra.-
I
M
I
oiredair�:h.�rcynnrm�rerlc�mxcn�eai,ini.Yee��wr�uN-n
S�u tk I 0 CC R Ik P9 P-U F PARlL xVJ AR65&P RE55
� �R�in
3ttn':.u"iM1'l.l�l.v.i.rJ l.'4.1•;�.�:ain�.:...�yn..i...9u:n a'.�I.�_LUik
Ar,nyr,�x�a�lR.rr_r._Sp.r a fnn.-r.r.�r.�h Ftt7 r.r 1•1:iCmrcc'r-.nY+i Gru�u•
I Gaik
I
1
� Porr o�n�xi�ri.r�ms�^a�•rn-tx o-s�:�::.,�:+:,r.��:rs��:r�i•r.�
maa,:m,e,�iRm,n��M1�,-•rr�r.r.M��:r.•,.•;�:resr-�c�,a.�aa,,.o f5:
• 'k��,4.Yi.: u-kei��Fr'i�.4,n:.iwxl�+: �. nvLV:5�5'l-t...ail:t
' --_ I'�4F�HIr�lx-�L0.'r-�rax-a:�Im�4Y�xA:af�q.�'>..:.��ork'— — — '
I�
II..,��,+.�
,+,� _ .:
_ —..r,s..-�-.-s. 1kL'k'b1'icP�C'�M.^.';.�S:o F a .-�.aAi� -i����i.
'�" x�J�u� 'n�Lcvx"fcy=o'i�,':"iY�i('7eWrc:L'e'A u1�s IixL�e cuii�
ii'h'eu '�h�in.
Jerc16e53]d:iUa-.11t�-.FYOnc_r.Tl._hkk'O4.•�1C.ch0.rc.F a���
�r�n.a_ss.
1.�a:m:w:I�AY.1�. 'lx::�. �!].'.I���-i�� i�fii.�.,��
-�14�m:�s=.�eFr�•r'i:e!I�is a'c V'uA'x:Ix:.��.14?17r..:rt1rG a�aunJ
x_.u:ac��nhd az 91 ai:ic]u�?•'��f tk.r.r:ar.�lah�i'-.
. �
:u lp;{Iw+t�w.bisouip.caiuf vrncctllock:s.ph�t A r2[i{�p 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 15
k��tuip]]eck,hisn�ii� Fu���oE3
, Heleeseai_:"i-+:���4Y�i<x'eel�e:4��•lei�ii��.�.�.e�i•�s
r+��.-�i�e--���-cr--syxr.nnsn:r.k...5-r:.1J'rv.ik�-ff" �il
i�rrc:rr.:�.�i.;:nc.c..� . .vr:.rxna}n:�� -.ir5„
:x,rs nanm m�n�yskP_u1�i5u.,.:w�,.,��.z�ri,��°bun� .
� � uw.��-cY;�rcnc•nr.l�r.'M'�My.�n+�rca�r:Mrn°r i
.� F�i .i:S��x:.ul�F.ix���w.n.rNU�:•��a-w:v'�etV�::4v'
...�.... •�� n.4'Ylx�.r.i'�LL�.u'i�xrq'c:L:c�:i�L:t'sr.i.l�:c_:.rr
• - - cL':w.'litl.e:�.?�'rr.na�lr:.f."!'n.i'r.-::�.r1:uH1'rih.f:ir�l��trl:H,-.'
:�9[u:i::rna'Pili.'n�i:.f�riii�F:INiv nli:: :. �.�i.•iii.��r
;.�.}:^'.f.'r 4 i�lr:_d'.e��.=i I'-:s_��i'Lei•�i.':�I�ela
� .wii F�.���.r.;.'fekes V�ru�a Soeces I>-I��I Skcw�liExxrc�-c
� '-.:Jxi:::Eti.r.al���tnii�cr.ef.:�'.Ih7.r,'�rcrf'�s:::r^f.•-r'
�rc:n„r .:,•�i:.�i:��.�..o.:��.:: .o��.� u�i i�•�.
I --_ Y n .i ft i:i ii 4 r:��rc��:::�.r.�e_I ir�"aJer 5'4a.e-eY:�AY.•rt��-:;�
I "��W�e Y'e��v'{'�Li:i A��i]�waArn"r SiY.:ik�:n.1^i.xa�il Irc�'M1"}k}'
I."t.
�wci�:n3.aga .
i ti:...4/•tlk"TraxL.rv
I
Jlllfl_r�x�w�w_6ihnni�r.cx rci�l�In7::4i31'Cl:.i.;]�l�) 4f2lir`2fJ I 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 16
U�ck Sei�r��r��,.yt��+l>oits tol lloc6:3.]'e�le��a]Su[il?oilcd I7ocLs,l7�xk'1'il�M1.1�'iind f]�xl.Tiir� Y>�y I i�f 3
r:'.-�':�r_�:�?+ -i----.. .
�0�1 • • i .
:�
H9ME �ECILBUM1POR7$ 'N000 ZLFS PEJ4N�613+9EHCHES .uv phRC SRCSM R9pF MORE INFO
4.i�r' �'.. 3ar.k SuPP'�+a�
ii i...� I Va�a.Jji�a
.e 4�I. �'�'.iif..l.l.� � �
ska.�.�
�"~ O150N�CCH 51/PPOGTS
FhoGUGaIICiV'LL'J.lOf.Snfi',�4x;i_�fY:�iii.mx x�uwl4.�i..i wl'lVan'FmJ�
I
— — — _ � —
I :.1:'�q..�r.5Cd':1.'.r'Y���.�'la sl��ax:a.ar.{'r A de:4�x cuixe mek�els..r.�i:cm r.;.z:��.-.rr.���..tc
�-dr.�� �wz:.,,.�,:r::�.v:��.,n i:l .Y r4 r:r�.i.i�i..i:��:i.�.-.'.�::lin.rJ_��
' e:V'e'.r�lrl:•.•N��9�–ox.h]7knl�.�ia'.��a ,�iriix.� .sl.�'1rJ�u.s�r.xra.i�Y-
� r:i*usc�::�-mrri�r�.nn .�<���.i..., ...:tr�• �� �_ .
�
s��rm� I n:w�e=,�ra:r ra.a-.:�:x-r..r,:�.,,_;:.�4,ur.�-�1.�.
— _' ati"rcnJx:j�ar��'.v'I:i'.^:kfnniin��L•�::�r..r ..eit.
I v�7�W L IT� :T.r�r.+.im�os I
� �7T. .�.w.� ."��Rn3cled�wl
F'�nr�irsR}�.:rv�AX yJ i_�I:awii Lti_�+L'faLL}o_r rl]ex: y�E[HYIIG lL9A.
YERSAUJUiia•�li�JW5iA6LCOCCIf5l1'40flT5 .r. �T.YJ'n1,:l��ii'iJl�'L]L=�
nr.ic :4'.`.Ir.e�'�s:: E'e¢:rS�t 9W��Fvarn":��i�vj i�:�i's5'
}i1 i E,:rl u�wu•.Fi.;nnip,c'uiNdc:kS.ippaits.17171} .1l3fir�}l I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 17
U[=t1S S�J�}G}Dl'[5.Soppeits ror lleckt,l'edasnl Supyoited�7ec,ks,Ueck'1'iLs,k�'ood lle�k'1'i[cs 1'nE�2�ri'i
q����� �'�.Yia aaalid:l�L�.'w� SITF.14f iLC.S°al.` n'.sl
�w�! Ku'i�y_9' ' '.u�.�-+uuwae'n1�ia.nievc -'` M171r.5:rM1''IfY
uW�eui�l dmo¢ ').•�.��..
9Jk In b�e I[Melnp iam�a�rx�.••
,���i i.i�uanr.r��:.��
n.r.iw-;,=�c�i r.�i�i.
�..�:i
� VS ��,�y'"'� r��, ax*' � � 1RL1 Vwhr 'i,`��
i . . Y lx p-•�
� ' , �d �ah�N
+'�� �+� � xx�'� S�'
:,�{ 10� �earsr"� ..Ly,. ' �
� . _'� . - ' ' " _" ' � 1�6D � 4�1 ��n.
Y'3 5 hM z W �m9r nntv' ;y' �W
I _ '_ h��i� � ..... �' �nkn I� I
{!! i ''+[n�in �' I
� inn��ir• •
I _�--"_ __ 9��__ r � Rii naars� '4r�r'.
� P91 W-
YL] !�� �.� �azl � LO4 �in+� ur� �ufri�
� � �I+�i� I rbl �RVR��'b '
'�'' . �.
'fflA RP �ev+��N��.^Y�?J�4�!�•L•��
YrJ16 � rlN�-�}n�rc�nluv+pep�a�rwi�•�•:•
.n iv�vr�r�r�+me�x'�v`r.�a'vfi�i.�°�'rm. lt i.ua Jw
�k�a.��rc..
S��g�6 Jsc+�i.���HYWrtf�:.•Y-6Laf...u���2�' 36'
� In0.�f�l m'ex
� � I x w.m.�
� �L a�.�..
I � �'�'� i .�z I� .�.
i I
—� — — —
� � � e� '
� �
��\'EL.ITG:ARl�iT.l1{6'.[PIGIf SI.PP9RiS ,i�k':�I�P._._ S.��q.l..
i
I ��fLi�lw.:�n �� �
i7ttV;1lww tc•.L isonip.comrdackSu P pa�-4�P �1fLCi+sl}i 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 18
1
Lk�ck�5uppnr�s.5uppnrtk for 17c�ks.l'e�ie;ta]Sii�lr�+r�i T�r��kr�,T]ec.k Tilr.ti.[�'nnJ T7�•c�}:'1'ilrE l'aGe:}«i?
IJdir.asiia:Mui�ienv�
� a��iU�� r � x�:�
Inti„�v...�,n.�br «.�.�,.
�
, �� �,�
u��
I lG ��w ♦.�r ��k. � �YT3f6 4n:M 4-n:�I»i�i~
•� I .HelE K i� 'h- nn
_..___—_ __ . � M0.9� �HtlexF :r: ,•t••
� Gi rc � .�n��.r I N679� � ' �P+ ;r.u�
� � _,.. u --,:� _�_ :q��_� ,�T
� ��.. � o., �.
I - I �1
LT78 1M'.+qt � � waWn �i
� 4T919i.n a}�5,x � l.aa n...aN v.,x�p" _
M y�.��'a
� �1 iu�..r�io�us.�..a.
�� � � a.�r�.�•�•�r:.u._
I „p.91�,.'�nauA _
� ..n.rb. ���.°`.":$�a�.A.r�s�r.an
ISCR[W]AC.[��A�]USTA9LE�ECM Sll�vOkis �..':�T�(�5[a:4'vn1�5.'nlPs
r��l� =i�Ls"L1.Tf
� �A1tlY'[bcan+d'�ucu L..:��1 xesvin�x�u�a
1flE'mli� H[iY M'G Y.15"ii�..
•d OommctlG p.iM1
.N9 W e MdIpF 5Ye5tl C . .
' 'A���np� � .Y131fi xn I:rr ifi I x�r
� ES I _4w�r x I � ' w r � I al �
� � ' ' ''_""_" 1.116�FI ..__.._ ._ _ I
r�ii��i..
� +�.���;c y r i 'Hp�-I "", �y',� '
� ___. . . I � IfYl a�Wxsirc_u_�"' '
� � R "��"'� a a.h �� ' ! � P51..!r.�ne. '.Ar ' '
�, �
� se.a
�__'_— i �uf oo..�,,.� � � '
I � �3 "���... "zw'' ' �N: � Fa .�m�.iu-
.sv, : � �Y...:.�„�'.�•
�..---- .FF� ��r��"..�W��x
I � ca m.x, M�,. w.,a�..n��......,.n.mt,,,.. .,�,.aNV.,
I � ae:sm.u.auc�a�W.io-n. w.�
�
' SaFxura++ue �
i ...�ie.i:.4.gR..r�iui�w
}�i4�:liwwu•,hisanip,ocut'cecktiuppnrts.pl�p •=!l[if�C�l l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 19
P'.ii,'.-o-.:+'1:^^! aX' �
Pavemen� t� ParkS
i.
San Franc�sca: a�visad�ra Street
San Francisaa'�Mayor Charnpians Parklet
The'preeiY movemenk i�ndendirg heyrnri imrymwng
the r.nrih4 r.rnimnma�t tn Imprnvin�peoples'
ernlrolli7�1115. 4rer{iine clenxfy puNulnhsl�:Ik1rs Ilkn
S�n Fran[ism 1w•,r_b4.om4 7iadQ?5 of cafSCl�20B whefC - ��I
aufomohlles su+�rm Illoe schods af�sFi_ r f
I
�5ar Pran[ixu's fdayor Gavin Neer9om is tnvikrraeting
ll.s LrcrxJ Ly msi��neing MF,s nf�ncc Fnr pocple hy
�R�fheadlf�]PaNelT1e11t W PBYK3. Ona reG�it p jed is
a°parkie�°h�at.prr a curb-adcdedca.��de the Ma]o
.6lcycle Cafg over v.tiat was mre W�o puhlic pnri'rx� t
� spnn�. Thn rkrkinr��rf�Is E�ort
��*i MaSiaYanil�ba lAtidJ Tilea{FSC
�r4'rfinC1 94�C'UVTS$S}df1Q 5
mnstrucoed uu�m arson5verad]��
��'� p.slcstal,f.sMin9 a�d 6iadnQ aya _..* '�.r�
�.. � ,.. GemB. The naturel�RSanlwoeid fiexk �'{.::'� ��k': -
� � 3. .�;�..
�--�xLSO{�FA�CW�SUf�l[Uh�SbQ-81[�6Wel��y�.�t',-. �._..,.. '
and.ormo the�treet v.tiere[hereaYe planlers,�eekirtig. . ��� �..".�, -
����a�nr��,i�r `.4t4+s•'' i�+
�,��a A�,c i��. �..�:�: '...�
'-� �r�;x, .� ,
Btson Hlyhllphh: . ,�E"'d�r: ,. ��,�'��
ACn7r41ng l4 Andl'eS Ptawc;r,Proiu[[mana9er for . pv dY� �I,'.;. ' '��-.
. L4�vement t�F�rks,t1�ey"get the same effect .�"'i�.��..
as a�YU0.460 Cux��rn�l trul6out at a Fraetion 'cn ?e. ;,�
.x�f�<�fii[[ds,"' . . . . ��. . �
. `�C�]�kt*lnfnma+a+ `� wr,emene�o Fai4s Infannariory�
�
����Y M { ��
r� ��:
��
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 20
Back
� ������nt t� P�rll� "Pnvcrrr�nitnFafi^srsac��llaboraii+�
efiC rt bent�x�tlre MzrY��O�v
.S�an Fran�isc�: Divisadero �treet ��e�������
plafxa;rtg nefrsfrnx4�y and the
Mu�idpa7 Transaxtaticu+��cy."r
Prajeet Infarmatian
r�nln-r�nr.�nnn san Frnnr�xn.[:a � .
��n hnre of rfo�o�wyclr�efe;1+�n yiiir
nf f]i�IryarWn 5[i�h,liah�nan FL�}���ad
Grcnn Strnetr
q�i(niirj fY,al? M1kerh 7�]hifl
Slee�4N x G� .
rT'JIk3�' ClSy9r5dn R3�xrn
Lamds[nPIM melrrtahed hf'Mofo Gefc
' A{Q11L9GC R1Y�1 CM1�myn M FLCa ArcM1IMiTCc
�r,�.ru�rti,�wrr,..���
m,j.,rr M�gar am�rtx„r.r -
San Fwnc�v Plwinlnp!}aWrLirx�M1
rn�ham�r u,e,�[�w:l9�x+�n'
[�eck.SUPa� 6'eanVwdexSuseA�5Wetableqeck����ws �
� tlo=kina a{aepei ��mnMqs:a�nd!�.�s[:Ltiefiiil '.. .. nopartr.�n of PLhli 1h�rks 61recWr Etl fae�kln.Supereimr
� "' ��,+,g�,'�yj-qpZSg��: � .Fhrie MlFlcarinil,antl NU}+or[s+.�n ninrr.om:t�nding lii wiiat
�rr;i�P�e!RPa�c i".S".. — us[Y1 ta be hw pe�klny s��s.Rl�ulu:Maltliew lootf�
i i'. -
I
k
� ' I5
F '__ I�I.
�
7� i,
F i:;
F� S..
T
9 �
A
�� -
�
1
2
Design Review Board February 14, 2013
Page 21
= 1 . - _ = ITEM NQ. 6A__ _.
�.,._ .
.
= — — _ -- _�. ____ r... � __� :.�
°= ��� ` Community`Development and Planning Department -
���r � t
����i��� � � 300 Seminary Avenue
r :�"�� �'�,��.���'� Ukiah, CA 95482
�� �}�:�
� � planning(�a cityofukiah.com
��
(707)463-6203
2
3 DATE: March 14, 2013
4
5 TO: Design Review Board
6 '
7 FROM: Shannon Riley, Praject and Program Analyst
8
9 SUBJECT: Revised Draft of Outdoor Dining Structure Program
10
11
12 REQUEST '
13
14 Review and comment on revised design standards in the draft guidelines for the proposed
15 Qutdoor Dining Structure Program
16
17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ss
19 On February 14, 2013, the Design Review Board reviewed the preliminary design standards for
20 the proposed Outdoor Dining Structure Program and pravided input regarding a number of '
21 items including patio surface, barriers, and furnishings.
22 The draft guidelines, attached, have been revised to include the DRB's recommendatians.
23 Much of the DRB's discussian was regarding various types af patio surFace, and the consensus
24 of the committee was that an installation of sand and brick/paver/stone tile would be relatively
25 easy to construct, cost effective, and cleanable. After reviewing this optian with staff and other
26 industry professionals, this recammendation has been included in the draft program guidelines.
27 Attachment 2 includes images af a sand and brick installation in Charlottesville, Virginia and '
28 Attachments 3 and 4 provide specifications for sand/paver installatian over asphalt.
29 The proposed program is designed to be processed like an encroachment permit, so long as
30 applicants follow the recommended design standards. For applicants seeking exceptions to
31 those standards, the project will be forwarded to the DRB for review. I
32 Ne�steps in developing the program will include a public meeting of the stakeholders and '
33 presentation to the City CounciL
34 Attachments:
35 1. Draft Guidelines for#he Outdoor Dining Structure Program
36 2. Images ofi SandlBrick Installation in Charlottesville, Virginia
37 3. Specs for Sand/Paver over Asphalt, Part 1
38 4. Specs for Sand/Paver over Asphalt, Part 2
1
s�
_ _ r�a�Ee'�.-.��ii77�i1� Yt�' �
�.�� ; — , :
;, , _ ,�; .— _.:. .<.�_ _� ;��
` 1 ss-OUTDOt7R DINI�IG STRUCTURE�PdiC�{E?' - -----` _. _ -= .. °
2
3 ItVSTRUCT'IONS:
4 Please follow these instrucfiions upon submittal of the following appiicatian packet and
5 consistent with the requirements of fihe Downtawn Zoning Code. ,
6
7 Prior to submitting an application, it is advised that the'business owner consult with the
8 City of Uki�h Public Works Department regarding the location of utilities, fire hydrants,
9 etce Due to utility locafiian and emergency vehicle clearance, not a ca�ions may be
10 appropriate for outdoor dining structures.
11
12 Outdoor D�ning Structures shall not obstruet starmwater ru must be readily
13 removable far maintenance of pavement, sidewalk, curb �� tfer a�` ' iiities.
14
15 An appiication fior Outdoor Dining shall include fhe g:
16
17 1, A compfeted and signed general applica ' d en chment per ` pplicatian.
18
19 2. Five (5) capies of a dimensional site plan (dra cale) that`includes the `
20 following (maximum size 24"x 36")
21
22 a. Address '
23 b. The underlying right-of-way a par es a the locatian of items
24 adjacent to the use area.
25 c. An outline of the raposed utdoor ing use and the location of any '
26 existing and c tdoor din uses.
27 d. 1°he propo layout II use furn ' s, including, but not limited to, tables,
28 chairs, u , hea lanters ncing, signage, etc.
29 e. The propose :r' � ' ' to serve the use—if electrical service is -
30 requ ed.
31 f. T circu to and from the outdoor dining use and the associated -
32 usiness, `ral pe' ' circulation, and building ingresslegress. '
33 �cation of ilding nd structures adjacent ta the outde�or dining use, � _
34 uding the ing proposing the use.
35 h. 'on, type d height of-any barriers surrounding the outdoor dining use.
36 i. Lin ight fr indoor dining area, demonstrating the ability to appropriatefy '
37 supe tdoor dining area
38
39 '
40 3. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed use will not black the display '
41 windouvs or signage of the adjacent business(s).
42
43 1. Specifications for the design, colors, and materials:of all propased furnishings
44 including but not limited to tables, chairs, urribrellas, heaters, planters,#encing,
45 trash receptacles, etc., demonstrating thafi all furnishings are of commercial
46 grade and designed far outdaar use and cc�nsistent with the requirements ofi '
1 '
� _ _ �_ �_ _. . � -- - ____._ _��_ _ - - __ �
� r._ __.. _._ ..� . . _ �_ _ .,__ ���� _ ��� � - - - - -
_�__�
---- --- -_- __�,. .. _... .: ---
1 ' fihe Downtawn`Zaning Code. _.__ _.___ _ --- � : .
; 2 2. A lighting plan, including under umbrella, table lighting, and any other lighting
3 proposed, showing fixture and lamp type and locations. (Installation of nevu
4 lighting may reguire a permit.) '
5 3. An operatianal schedule including hours, days, and months {outdoor dining
6 shall be required to operate far a minimum of 8 hours per day, 6 days per
7 week as weather permits),
8 4. Photas of the project area, including adjacent buildings and windows, to
9 demanstrate impact on neighboring businesses.
10 5. Evidence of Comprehensive Liability lnsurance, evide ' - � arkers`
11 Compensation Insurance; and a signed Hold Harm1 � and Indemnification
12 statement (that indemnifies and holds harmless t � Ukiah, its officials,'
13 employees, agents and volunteers, and the un � � `ing � � ' rty awner(s)), in a
14 form appraved by the City's Risk Manager. '
15 6. A copy of the applicant's appraved Gity of' usiness lic
16 7. Fees, Charges and Qeposits
17 1. Outdoor Dining Structure Perrni af$2 due upon ap val of'
18 Outdoor Dining Structure applicati • e- ' e} '
19 2. Usage Fee of 25 cents per square fo month (due upon approval of
20 4utdoor Dining Structu application, to ' vaiced monthly by City)
21 3. Maintenance/Damage ' it of e- ime deposit due upon
22 an applicant's initial ap ` an annua door Dining Permit. If
23 the applicant re=applies an a `rmit e follawing year, the
24 deposit will be carried ove t e it. lf the applicant does not`
25 re-apply fo nual per` r the u ` s discontinued, an inspection af
26 the use determin 'f the deposit, ar a portion thereof, would `
27 be ap d to rep and dam ` reated by the use. If no damages
28 hav ed,t ` osit wo be refunded to the'applicant). '
29 I
30 General
31
32 Appli ns for Out ining cture permits will be handled through the
33 enc ` nt permit p ss when consistent with the design guidelines specified in
34 the Outd 'ning Stru` re Guidelines and Sectian 5.080 of the Downtown Zaning
35 Code.
36
37 An Outdoor Dini mit shall be valid far a period of one year, 6eginning on January
38 1st and ending on ecember 31st.�
39
40 Permits for subsequent years vuill be issued on a first come basis, except that#he
41 holders of a permit for the pri�r year will be given priority over new applicants. Each '
42 year, the applicant shall submit a complete application for an 0utdoor Dining Structure
43 Permit as defined above. If no'changes ta'the project are praposed, plans are nat
44 required for renewaL An inspection may be reguired by the Public Warks Department.
45 If the project is deemed to be out �f cornpliance with the Guidelines, the permit may be
46 denied or conditianally approved.
2
�1 - - -- - - _ _. - ------- - - _-- - - - -
2 Outdoor Dining Structure Permits are not transferable.
3
4 An Outdoor Dining Permit is an interruptible privilege. The City may interrupt the
5 aperation of an outdoor dining use at any time due to anticipated ar actual conflicts.
6 Such conflicts may arise from, but are not limited to, scheduled festivals and similar
7 events, parades or marches, repairs to the public right of way, or demonstrations or
8 emergencies occurring in the area. Outdoar dining uses sha11 be permitted to continue
9 during special events unless the City of Ukiah specifically reguests at the use '
10 temporarily discontinue fior the duratian af the event. Such requ - include the !
11 removal af all use furnishings. '
�.�:,� �
�
3
. ,. .,. ..: . ,: -� ,
; .,; - - -
;
--1 ��`Guidelines ; _ __ --_
2 Purpose
3 The purpose of the Outdoar Dining .Structure Guidelines is ta create an enhanced
4 quality and consistent pattern of outdaor dining areas that reflect the unique character of
5 downtown Ukiah. The Downtown Zoning Code ailows for sidewalk cafes (on public
6 property) and outdoor dining (on public property), and a pilot project starting in 2011
7 demonstrated the feasibilifiy of outdoor dining structures. These gui elines are
8 consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General PI .: ;
9 .
10 Prografn �oundaries: The boundaries of the Outdoor Dini` cture'Program are
11 as followse EastNVest- Main SfireetJOak Street, NorthlSa��•.= — - �. Streefi/Clay Street.
12 (Commercial Core Properties)
13
14 Allocation af the Public Right of Way (Parking ace s)): Allacation ublic
15 right of way for autdoor dining use shall be bas on fron e between th - ended ;
16 property lines af the bui(ding in which the ass front' round filaor torefront
17 restaurant use is an occupant: Where more than o f e total square footage of '
18 a parking space is located between the extended pro lines, an application for
19 allocation af that parking space may de by th� o' r tenant of such use.
20 Where one-half or less of the total sq e of a par ace is located'between
21 the extended property lines, an applica n' tion of t parking space may be
22 made by the owner or tenant of such us ut ' the written agreement of the
23 affected underlying propert wner, at no ensat , and shall be conditionally
24 allocated until such tim ' ted adja t groun loor storefronfi restaurant use
25 requests and is appr d for a ation of t u lic right of way for their use. In such
2b circumstance, the ed pro rty line will ome the dividing mechanism befinreen
27 the twa allocated uses, 15' ' Il be given to vacate any previous
28 conditional allocatian tha side a property line extensions.
29
30 In order nsur ' and stricted use af adjacent parking spaces, there
31 must rninimum " betw the outdoor dining structure,and the adjacent
32 spa
33
34 Restaurant ted on` reef corners may utilize ane side anly. ,
35
3b Allocation of th_ walk Area: Allocation af the sidewalk area sh�ll complywith the
37 Downto�nrn �oning ode, Section 5.080 and may be allawed only where the sidewalk is
38 wide enough to adeguately accammodate the usual pedestrian tra�c in#he area,to
39 comply with California State accessibility standards �nd federal ADA requirements, and
40 the operation of the propased restaurant.
41
42 Permanent Changes to Public F2ight of Way: Permanent changes to the public right
43 of way ar� not permitted. Any street, sidewalk, or City improvements, furnishings, and
44 utilities damaged or destroyed by the outdoor dining use shall be replaced to City ,
45 siar�c�ards�iith i�� ���t'�ar►re by th� �erri�e�.
1
_ � � � � � � � . �
�
� .: ,,
} _ - - -- = - �
1 ° -- _- _ : _.._. ,. - - - -- ----- - ------
; 2 Use�rea: Furnishings and decoratians shall nofi encroach beyand the permifited use ,
3 area or overhang pedestrian or vehicular circulation paths.
4
° 5 Maintenance and Security: All outdoor dining area furnishings shall be maintained in a
6 safe and clean condition.All sidewalk furnishings shall be stored indoars nightly;
7 Furnishings shall be secured within the Outdoor`Dining Structure area or stored indoors
8 nightly.
9
10 All outdoor dining use areas shall be maintained in an attractive ' free from spills,
11 litter and ather debris) and safe manner. '
12 '
13 �=ood and Beverages: Service of faod and beverages s �com ' �' �1:h �ection 5080.G
14 of the Downtawn Zoning Code:
1S
16 G. Food and Beverages: �utdoar dining ' s may only serve foo
17 nanalcaholic beverages prepared or st for s t the adjoinin ndaor
18 restaurant; provided, hawever, that the se of r wine or bc�th solely for
19 on-premise consumption by customers withi ` utdoor dining area may be
20 autharized by the Planning Dir tor and Police rtment if each of the
21 fallowing requirements are rn '
22 1. The outdoor dining oper� ' licensed, rior to the service of any
23 beer or wine will be duly I nse e aut rities to self beer or wine
24 for consurnption within the ''td di a."
25 2. The`authori tdoor dini � ea is i tified in a manner which will
26 clearly s a delineat from the areas of the sidewalk that will
27 ` remai en ta p' strian tra
28 3. Qne sign prove s part af the encroachment permit, are
29 posted d ' alk cafe is in operatian, which shall give
30 'ce to the s custom , that the drinking'of beer or wine or the
31 of an container which contains beer or wine is prohibited
32 and ul outs delineated outdoor dining area.
33
34 or dining a s authorized by the Planning Department and Palice
35 De ent and`i ompliance with the requirements of Section 5.070 are
36 exem UC ection 6000. `
37
38 Closure of Busi` : Outdoor dining use area furnishings shall be removed
39 immediately upon e permanent closure of the assaciated business.
40
41 Signage: No signage shall be allowed in the outdoor dining area except for the'name of
42 the establishment an an umbrella fringe and in compliance with this Section and UCC
43 Division 3, Chapter 7 (Sign Ordinance, UCG Section 9224.8(D8)).
44 Portable Heaters: Outdoor heaters are allowed subject to Fire and Building Code
45 compliance.
2
;. - _ ._ „�- .
., �
'°1 `Trasli`Receptacles. Trash aii{d-refuse-receptacles`forthe sidewalk cafe�s'hall riot be '
Z permitted within the area designated for the sidewalk cafe or on adjacent sidewalk ,
3 areas and the permittee shall remove�rash and litter as they accumulate. Trash and/ar
4 refuse containers may be authorized within the outdoor dining area or adjacent sidewalk
S areas with Zoning Administrator approval of a Minor Use Permit.
6 Food Service: To minimize litter and debris, where table wait service is provided, or
7 f�od is served to the customer on.a tray to be taken and eaten on site in the dining area,
8 plates, glasses, cups and silverware made af permanent {non-disp able) materials '
9 such as glass, ceramic,-and metal, and cloth napkins shall be re " - The use of
10 disposable food containers, utensils, and napkins is permitted y wh re fiood is served
11 to the custorrier"to go"
., .:.
12 MusictEntertainment: Non-live music andlor speakers � be a ized with Zoning '
13 Administratar approval af a Minor.Use Permit.
14 ,
15 Desiqn S�andards:
16
17 All outdoor dining fumishings shall be of commercia e and designed for outdoor
18 use. Due to the proximity of traffic fl ansideration e given to minimizing
19 potential driver distractian.
20
21 All furnishings shall be praperly maintai an 'r gularly.
22
23 Barriers
24 Railings shal design' f wrough treated v�road, cast aluminum or
2S similar mat' shal ceed �n heighte Large planters may also be '
26 used as barriers, f r ' maintained with live, healthy plants year-
27 round. �
28 ectors e plac e corners closest to traffic to improve visibility.
29 oholic bev es are o be served, fencing shall meet the requirements of '
30 th associat icense issued by the State Dep�rtment of Alcoholic Beverage
31 Can BC). ;
32 "Open" nce: Perimeter enclosures with a height of between 36" and
33 48" must b least 50 percent open{see❑through) in order to maintain visibility '
34 of street level activity.
35
36 t'atio Surface
37 Pre-approved patio surfaces include brick/paver/stane tile aver sand base
38 (specifications attached), or prefabricated d�ck-system from an approved or '
39 comparable manufacturer. (�ee attached.)
�r0 �e���r�g
3
# x
.i. .: .. . . '.. .:.,. ...: ... ; ,:. Y • .; . . ., . _• __
�: , �
.. . .; .. , . -. . . '. .., r .. ..i .' ,"',
1 '=----- Tables and chairs shall=be�ofi=commercial grade'and desigried�for outdoor use: =
2 All furnishings shall be properiy maintained and cleaned regularly,
; 3 Benches and/or bar-styla seating may be incorporated inta the design.
4
5 Materials, Colors, and Design — Permitted:
6 ■ Tables and chairs shall be of the same or a similar and compatible
7 design.
` 8 a Framework: Wrought iron,fabricated steel, c uminum, cane ar
9 teak ar similar materiaL
; 10 ■ Chair seat: Wrought iron,fabricated ste �st aluminurn, cane,
11 teak, rattan or similar materiaL '
. ... .
12 ■ Color: All tables and chairs within a area `e of the same
13 �r compatible color.
14 ■ Table top: Solid tops of slate, rb , granite,faux rought
15 iron, embossed aluminum,'° , tem red glass, an h tops of
16 wrought iran and alumin 'milar erial are pe itted. .
17 ■ Table Tap Dimensions: Squ' "' e ngular 36"x 24", round
18 30,,.
19 ■ Tabie Height: St rd cafe heigh 30".
20 Materials, Calors, and Design — Pr 'b
21 • Plasfic, resin, and p I s are prohibited.
22 • Brig ctive, an' ` resc�n ' lors are prohibited.
Z3 Umbrellas a mbre tands
24 Table center a est re are permittedo
25 Umbr hall be ed with a minimum base of not less than 60 pounds and
26 s rtical c nce of seven feet from the patio surface.
27
28 Materials Colars:
29 ■ Um Ilas: All umbrella panels shall be of the same or
30 c ' lementary solid color(s). Fluorescent colors are prohibited.
31 yl or plastic umbrellas are prahibited.
32 ■ Permitted Stands: Cast aluminum, wrought iron, fabricated steel,
33 wood, or similar material.
34 Lighting
35 Under umbrella lighting (directional or tube) and tabletop lighting (candles or
36 other law level light sources) are permitted. Lighting shall create a soft glow
37 directed at the tabietap or cart surFace. Lighting shall not create glare or'fiall ;
4 '
--.- . . _ �.- = -
,.�. . = . -=4 •--
.,..:.
11 ` outside ofi tlie use"area:�'-Bare�bulb'rieon; backlit;=�colored�lights,-blinking or
2 . "chasing" lights are prohibited.
3 Ofher Decorative Items
4 p Padded fabric chair pads are permitted, shall be brought indoors nightly, and
5 shall be clean when plaeed outside each day.
6 � Tabietop flower arrangements, centerpieces, and candles are permitted and
7 shall be brought in nightly. '
8 ■ Sfireamers, balloor�s, and banners are prohibited.
9 8 Other decorative lfiems nat specifically permitted her a rohibited.
10 @ Furnishings and decorations shall not encroach b the permitted use
11 area or overhang pedestrian or vehicular circul , n .. . �.
12 Exception ta fihe Guidelin�s
13
14 Zoning Administr�tor
15
16 Exception(s)to these guidelines may be a 'z Zoning Administrator
17 approval of a Minar tJse Permit.
18
19 Design Review Board
20
21 The Planning Direetor may refer y ap to th Design Review Board for
22 review and recomm�ndation on a ic ns ay be inconsistent with the
23 Design Standards
24
25
26
27
�� '
5
• . ! . o 0 0 ' • i .
• •
z:� �,`�� ��� "�z:�+'�+ � �� f'.
F ��rq��� �z � ���r� ���°� � �ep 4����7 $q '�
�s� � ��°��� �� ' �� �
����r�k� �< � ,r�
���t�a+���K�ad, r� �.�k ��t rt�.�� 6 v��k
t � tVl�,- ,�,g S':i"4`� �r ,y� ��a k t ; �.�tY'...+�' �• �
E` � '� �.�fit��„ �, �� ,�, �. . : „s,, J�
'�_ ' :''�!J�{ Y �+Y � y� ;Y?.
�tA♦t' .. i � � .y �.'����� 1+.�+. . 1 � J� i+
� �� �� �'�� �'� � •�`������ �� s���,4���� �� ����` �� .
��.� !� ; c4 t{ � �,k � ' �� ' �' ""��.. .�
��E�a ��..rA{ ;.*.t,w.,. �� ` +YS� * ��� . �{ � � �' � ��� ; . �:
� t� i €
q }
�t�� ��� ����'�'�"4 � �y� 3" E$��������� �f �� � 4 ��4y�� ��� �c� � i a �
i �
rv �t� �s � �� q7� x� ��� � � �� � � � � �
i� � k r s t t rve��l { .°�`,� 4��� ��. i N�.! ' '", �
�s t �ti"��� � �
�.��°�� ��� ° ��� tr?t"d r� �'� 1
a ¢� as �a� a^„�' �� �*,'�ne�"i � �„ ��
�.; '�� .�r,� _ N c �` ``"���,� .€. -. � ' � �.:e
� t ,�� �ai �� � w'� �� €
.r r ,� �, ,e �`� :' �9 �� il I �"�.�`�€
�M ��„� � �, ' . �. wx_��. ,
.�� � �° '�� �. �-�=,
�
�,�; , � �rnr - : �� � � w� ��a
µ
�.
,
..
��.�-.� • ----a �, , ., a , ..
r� � • ea � a
..��, �. ��''� ��� � r
��
�k�
:�J° ��,� ' �="k��v"�?� � t����� �.,,���:
ta.,°.�: ,'+�.::� 4.'R�,u''.��.
S �?n.,.� � , ..+
;d`:, � � � `'t. � ��,`�`� �� � ���
� y„ a i
# t� ,a °'�.; �. ,�'. S ����.b'��.. ,.
-�. 1� t;{ ,�:"",r� .. ? �,+ � y� . `'
� .,{„ i �4°<!�A �� r b"' `4'�, *� � . ` t ` '�,"`i.+��� { � 'I�
� r . �} �'h.,e` 4i .?r ��F�
�v �'4k„�#��,��� 'gkh �', " `,`� y�������
�� �. ���>�- ��� ,a ' � '!�`� �
,� � ��;r,` : � '�� t. ��� �� ���. ;
� w` � �;4 �I k�"x' ����� ,��e4�_ ��� ��' � �
{ ea."�� �'},�� C% ( a R � ,` C,"� � ?
f{ $, ��w�" ��i P.1w �� 'Vk .p$ .;T t �����'� ��'�( +�� r+�b
:.j ��L�',�`,.��. / �"�fi.� �Y� � E 4���I.M1 ��'�,.��tt' � � �# � ��
f'�w � ' � ,.�,+ / r� �. �
{ t �4 '� ��,' � ��_, � c I<� x � a� ���.`'�t, � � � �t�.l�
� ,. � ��v �y '�$� .t�' �-� ,�# �� F ��
?. +:�� . "`�µ ,i � .� ' f �h ��Y ��. 4
�( � t � �,� 5 �� 4t ��e" � ,�'�*�° +' lI �L: "°rv� �:�.�.t�.i �
� E .t t �� gp "�; -s � xt
� � �t' �� � 9�� .d`,tt l `k �
� � 6�` '"�. +� �-,
a .� � t
. pR k t t _' it� �. ,'. :
�,,; � ,�_ , `i =�e�� °'��"" �.��"�^ �"#� r
� �i, e 4 . "� ,: '* ..�r �. "�6 =�a,�a+,. ; :s".
i� �' t�+ tt �`�'`�# �'t�r.% � �f"�t,�� ��
a �
�.�»�',.� � �""A � � ` ��,as�'r t t� �Y �,.�� N�,w�,.
i rz*�;� �a\ ��'
�1 .
� ,
v. �s �.,K�''ratt t��,'��"� $..,x����' S? 5 � .,�,�ti n��`��.� 8 `� .
P . #�,�a"�l...4�rw3 r� c��`1`}"� �x�Z1.�
�y, �
� .� �� ��. ������� � �
"�.3�.�w��ma '""`,Y a',�.. � k
��xi'"���a.�"v'� . �'� �`�+".�+�,'s i'� 4 �a�'�(;f`'„�`��"+�v���i x�§��„�d��r.. $'Y
r;a�,�i?,v
�� � � � �
� � ° �,� ��"����� �a'����''d�'�F,,,�,.'
��;
""„'�n t s«,� � ���. �„�� � *�� '�
� am�.. g y t ��^�, �`,"`"'P 4�� .'.�"d
� 1�
����:�^ .w"`�� � ,'�� �,�� _,� ,�.t��a�»F
4„ a'y��a' :�«m.. e�z
�. .ea4�` ,', '4y�:..
� �
1
' �j�, �r>> e; ;'� �'
ot,�w,�t�tis��' 7� �
` US-paver overlay.doc
, _
r =_ _ , _, : --. _ _ _
� — _ — — -
4 ,� v
F� .� .- _.,: . �::: .�- -- 'SECTION 321413 - - _ ' - -
.__ . . . . , . . ;.,r_- _ . -.-t .7., ..- .,
' INTERLOCKING CCINCRETE PAVEMENT OVERLAY
(1995 MasterFormat Sectian 02780) '
Note: This guide specificatian for the U.S. is far the construction of a nevu ar rehabilifative overlay of
concrete pavers and bedding sand over existing asphalt,,concrete,or aggregate base. Applicatians inelude '
pedestrian and vehicu/ar areas. The text rrrust be edited ta suit specific project requirements. This Section ,
includes the term`Architect.''Edit this term as necessary to idenfify the design professiona/in the General
Conditions of the Gontract.
PART1 GENERAL -
1.01 SUMMARY '
A. Section Inciudes
1. Concrete paver units.
2. Bedding and joint sand.
3. Geotextiles:
4. Edge restraints.
5. [Cleaners and Sealers]
B. Related Sections
1. Section: [ ]-Curbs and Drains.
2. Section: [ ]-Concrete Base:
'3. Section: [ ]- Pavements,Asphait and Concrete. '
4. Section: [ ]-Geotextiles.
Note:Pavements subject to vehicles shouid be designed in consultafian with a quatified civil engineer, in
accordance with established pavement design procedures,ICPI Lockpave software, and in accordance with
fhe ICPI Tech Spec fechnica/bulietins. Use fhe current year reference. '
1.Q2 REFERENCES
A. American Society of Testing and Materials(ASTM):
1. C 33, Specification for Concrete Aggregates.
2. C 136, Method for Sieve Analysis#or Fine and Caarse Aggregate.
3. C 140, Standard Test Methods for Sampiing and`Testing Concrete Masonry Units
and Related Units.
4. C 144, Standard Specification for Aggregate for Masonry Morkar.
5. C 936, Specification for Solid Interlocking Concrete Paving Units.
6. C 979, Standard Specification for Figments for Integraily Colored Concrete.
7. C 1645, 5tandard Test Method for Freeze=thaw and De-icing Salt Durability af Solid '
Concrete Interlocking Paving Units:
B. Interiocking Concrete Pavement Institute(ICPI) '
1. ICPI Tech Spec Technical Builetins
1.03 SUBMITi'ALS
A. In accordance with Canditions of the Contract and Division 1 Submittal Procedures Section.
B. Manufacturer's drawings and detailse Indicate perimeter conditions, relationship ta adjoining
materials and assemblies, [expansion and control joints,]concrete paver[layout,][patterns,] ',
[color arrangement,]installation[and setting]details.
C. Sieve anafysis per ASTM C 136 for grading of bedding and joint sand.
D. [Bedding sand durability test results.] '
E. Concrete pavers:
1. [Four]representative full-size samples af each paver type,thickness,color,finish that
indicate the range of colar variation and te�ure expected in the finished installation.
Color(s)selected by[Architect][Engineer]jL�ndscape Architect][Owner]from
manufacturer's available colors.
2. Accepted samples b�come the standard�f acceptance for the work.
1
, .
r - ,
US-paver overlay.doc
� -°i-�l . 4. 9 i: ...:. .� �_� .,._.:: .._ .�� r.. _ - ._ .
.,.. .. ,. �..
> _ " ._�._ _ ._ .. . _ _ '_
::S ..:,.: . . . . ... :, . .
�� �" "� "�'3. � � �`� Test resuit's"�'Frori-i��an ande �endenf'te5tin�`'laboratar for�-com lia`n�e of" avm� � �
` _ P . g Y � p p� � unif— .. ..; _ ._:: �
; requirements to ASTM C 936. '
4. Manufacturer's certifieation of concrete pavers by;ICPI as having met"appiicable
= ASTM standards. '
5. ` Manufiacturer's catalog praduct data, instaliation instructions, and material safety
; data sheets for the safe handling of the specified materiais and products.
' F. Paver Installation Subcontractor:
, 1. A copy of Subcontractor"s cutcent certificate from the interiocking Concrete
Pavement Institute Concrete Paver Instalier Certification program. '
2. Jab references fram projects of a similar size and complexity. Provide '
�wner/ClientlGeneral Gontractor names, postal address, phone,fax,and emaii '
address.
1.04 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Paving Subcontractor Qualifications: '
1. Utilize an installer having successfully completed concrete paver instailatic�n similar '
in design, material, and extent indicated on this project.
2. Utilize an instalfer hoiding a current certificate from the Interlocking Concrete
' Pavement institute Concrete Paver Installer Certification pragram. '
B. Regulatory Requirements and Approvals: [Specify applicable licensing, bonding or other
requirements af regulatory agencies.].
C. Mock-Ups:
1. Install a 7 ft x 7 ft{2 x 2 m)paver area.
2. Use this area to determine surcharge of the bedding sand layer,jaint sizes, lines,
laying pattern(s), calor(s), and texture of the job.
3. ' This area wili be used as the stantlard by which the workwill be judged.
4. Subject to acceptance by owner, mock-up'may be retained as part of finished'work.
6. If mock-up is not retained, remove and properly dispose of mock-up. �
1.05 DELIVERY, STORAGE& HANDLING
A. Generai: Comply with Division 1 Product Requirement Section.
B. Comply with manufacturer's'ordering instructions and lead=time requirements to avoid
constructian delays.
C. Delivery: Deliver materials in manufacturer's original, unopened,undamaged containers
paekaging with identification labels intact.
1. Caordinate delivery and paving schedule to minimize inte�ference with n�rmal use
of buildings adjacent to paving.
2. Deliver conCrete pavers ta the site in steel banded, plastic banded or plastic
wrapped packaging capable of transfer by fork lift or clamp lift.
3. Unload pavers at job site in such a rnanner that no damage occurs to th�product.
D. Storage and Protection:Store materials protected`such that they are kept free from mud,
dirt, and other fareign materials. [Store concrete paver cleaners and sealers per '
manufacturer's instructions.] ',
1. Cover`bedding sand and joint sand with waterproof covering if`needed to prevent ',
` exposure to rainfall or removal by wind. Secure the covering in place. '
1.06 PROJECT/SITE CONDITIQNS
A. Environmental Requirements: '
1. Do not install sand or pavers during heavy rain or'snowfalL
2. Do not install sand and pavers over frozen aggregate base materials.
3. Do not install frozen sand or saturated sand.
4. Da not install concrete pavers on frozen'or saturated sand. ` '
1.07 MAINTENANCE
A. Extra Materials: Provide[Specify area][Specify percentage.]additional mat�rial for use by
owner�or maintenance and repair.
2
, .
� US-paver overiay.doc
{ - — :� u._ . - ��:-- ��� - _ _
� � �`� "` LL B: �-�Pavers shall be from tlie sameLLpro�uction=run asinstalled mafenals. f y °.�`�. ' °���.� �
} _ _ ...
PART2 PRQDUCTS
2:01 CONCRETE PAVERS
Note: Cancrete pavers may have spacer bars on each unit. They are highly recommended for mechanically
installed pavers. Manually instatled pavers ir�ay be installed with ar withouf spacer kars.
R. Manufacturer: [Specify ICPI member manufacturer name.).
1. Contact: [Specify ICPI member manufacturer contact information.].
B. Interlocking Concrete Pavers: '
1. Paver Type: [Specify name of product group,family, series,;etc.].
a. Material Standard� Gomplywith material standards in ASTM C 936. ',
b. Color[and finish]: [Specify color.�[Specify finish]. '
c. Color Pigment Material Standard:Comply with ASTM C 979.
d. Size:[Specify.]inches[({Specify.}mm)]x[Specify.� inches[({Specify.}mm)]
x[Specify.]inches[({Specify.}mm)�thick.
Nate:If 3 9/&in (SD mm)thick pavers are specified, their compressive strength fest results per ASTM C 940
should be acljusted by multiplying by?.18#o�quafe the resuits to#haf from 2 3l8 in. (60 mm)thick pavers.
e: Average Compressive Strength (ASTM C 140): 8000 psi(55 MPa)with no
individual unit under 7200 psi(50'MPa) per ASTM C 940.
f. Average Water Absorption (ASTM C 140): 5°to with no unit greater than 7°l0.
g. FreezelThaw Resistance(ASTM C 1645); Provide test results ta 28
freezelthaw cycles with no greater loss than 225 g/m2 af surface area or 49
cycles with na greater loss than 500 g/m2 of surface area.Freeze-thaw
testing requirements shall be waived for applications not exposed to
freezing conditions.
2.02 PRODUCT SUBSTITUTIONS '
A. Substitutions: No substitutions permitted.
2A3 BEDDING AND JOINT SAND
A. Provide bedding and joint sand as follows:
1. Washed, elean, non-plastic,free from deleterious or foreign matter,symmetrically ,
shaped, natural or manufactured from crushed rock. �
2. Do not use limestone sereenings,stone dust, or san�for the bedding sand
material that do not conform to#he grading requirements of ASTM C 33.
3. Do not use mason sand or sand conforming to ASTM C 144 for the 6edding sand.
Note:Bedding sand durabitity is important forcrosswalks and other vehicular pavements exposed fo high
traffic, especiat/y high truck fraffic.lCPl Tech Spec 17 Bedding Sand Selection for Interlocking Concrete
Pavements in Vehicular Applications recornmends durability evaluation using the Micro-aevat degradation '
test per ASTM�7428. The maximum recommended loss is 8%. This ASTM test is recommended when ',
pavers and sand will be p/aced over concrete, or asphalt, and subject to major thoroughfare tratfic(over 1.5 '
million lifetime 98,000 Ib (80 kN)eguiva(ent sing/e axle loads or ESALs or a Caltrans Traffic/ndex of 9.5).If
high tratfic/oads are anticipated and suitab/e bedding sand cannot be specified, the designer may consider
using bitumen-set(sand-asphalt)bedding layer under the pavers. '
4. Where conerete pavers are subject t�vehicular trafific, utilize sands that are as hard '
as practically available. ,
5. Sieve according to ASTM C 136.
3 '
� _
' US-paver overlay.doc
� . ; 4
- . : � �,--� ;_ �. -
: . .� .... - -�` -
., �
---- --=6: Bedding-Sand Mate'rial Requirements. Conform to the grading requireme�nts of '
; � - - ` --
ASTM C 33 with modifications as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
ASTM C 33Grading Requirements for Bedding Sand
Sieve Size Percent Passing
318 in. (9.5'mm) �00
Na 4(4.75 mm) 95 to 100
; No. 8 (2.36 mm) 85 to 100 ,
No. 16{1.18 mm) 5�to 85.
No. 30(0.600 mm)' 25 to 60
Na 50(0.300 mm) 1 Q to 30
Na. 1 Q0 (0.��0 mm) 2`to 10`
Na 20d (0:075 mm) 0 to �
Note: Coarser sand than thaf specified in Tabie 2 below may be used for joint sand including C 33 or A23.�1
material as shown in Table �. Use material where fhe largest sieve size easily enters the smallesf joints. For
exampte, if the smallest paver joints are 2 mm wide, use santl 2 mm and smallerin partiele size. (f C 33
sand is used for joint sand, exfra efforf may be required in sweeping material and compacting fhe pavers in
order to camplete/y fill the joints.
7. Joint Sand Material Requirements: Conform to the grading requirements of ASTM G '
144 as shown with modifications in Table 2 below:
Table 2
ASTM C 144 Grading far JoinfSand
Natural Sand Manufactured Sand
Sieve Size ' Percent Passing Percent Passing
No.4'(4.�5 mm) 100 100
Na 8 (2.36 mm) 95 ta�00 95 to 100
No. 16{1.18 mm) 70 ta 100 70 to 100 ;
No. 30(0.600 mm) 40 to 75 40 to 100
No. 50(0.300 mm) 10 to 35 20 to 40
No. 100(0.150 mm} 2 to 9 5 10 to 25
No. 200(Q.075 mm) 0 to 1 0 to 10 ' '
Nofe: Specify specific components of a system, manufactured unif or fype of equipment. See ICPI Tech '
Spec 3, Edge Restraints for Interlocking Concrete Pavements forguidance on selection and design of edge
restraints.
2.Q4 EDGE RESTRAINTS
A. Pravide edge restraints installed around#he perimeter of all interlacking concrete paving unit
areas as follows:
1. Manufacturer: [Speeify manufacturer.�.
` 2. ' MateriaL• [Plastic][Concrete][Aluminum][Steel] [Pre-cast concrete][Cut stone]
[Conerete]. '
3. Material Standa�d: [Specify material standard.). '
2.05 ACCESSOR(ES"
A. Provide accessary materials as follows: ' '
1. Geotextile Fabric:
a. Material Type and Description:[Specify material type and description.�,
b. Material Standard: [Specify material standard.].
c. Manufacturer. [Acceptable to interlocking concrete paver manufacturer]
[Specify manufacturer.].
4
�_ j
US-paver:overlay.doc
}.. - �" — �` _
. � _..._
Note:De/ete arficle below if cleaners, sea/ers, andlor joint sand stabilizers are not specified. -
2. [Cleaners][Sealers] [Joint sand stabilizers]
a. Material Type and Descriptian:[Specify material type and description.].
b. Material Standard: [Specify material standard.]: '
c, Manufacturer: [Specify manufacturer.].
PART 3 EXECUTIQN
3.01 ACCEPTABLE INSTALLERS
A. [Specify acceptable paving subcontractors.]. '
Note: The elevations and surface tolerance of the base determine the final surface elevations of concrete '
pavers. The paver inst�llatio.n eontracfor cannot correct deficiencies in the base surf�ce with additional
bedding sand or by ofher means. Therefore, the surface elevations of the base should be checked and
accepted by the Genera/Contractor or designated party,with wriften eertificatian to the paving '
subcontractor,prior to piacing bedding sand and concrete pavers:
3.Q2 EXAMWATION
A. Acceptance of Site Verification of Conditions:
�. General Contractor shail inspect,accept and certify in writing to the paver
installation subcontractor that site conditions meet specificatians for the following
items prior to installation af interlocking concrete pavers. '
a. Verify that subgrade preparation,campacted density and elevations
confiorm ta specified requirements.
b. Verify that geotextiles, if applicable, have been placed according to
drawings and specifications.
c. Verify that[Aggregate][Cement-treated][Asphalt-treated][Concrete]
[Asphalt] base materials,thickness,-[compacted density],surface tolerances
and elevations conform to specified requirements.
d. Provide written density test results far soil subgrade, [aggregate]{cement�
treated][asphalt-treated][asphalt]base materials ta the Owner, Gene�al
Contractor and paver installation subcontractor.-
e. Verify location, type,and elevations of edge restraints, [concrete collars
araund] utility structures, and drainage holes and inlets.
2. Do not proceed with installation of bedding sand.and interlocking concrete pavers
until[subgrade soil and]base conditions a�e corrected by the Gen�ral Contractor or
designated subcantractor. '
3.03 PREPARATION
A. Verify base is clean and dry, certified by General Contractor as meeting material,instalfatian
and grade specifications.
B. Verify that base[and geotextile]is ready to support sand, jedge restraints,]and, pavers and
imposed loads. '
C. Edge Restraint Preparation:
1. Install edge restraints,per the drawings[and manufacturer's recommendations�[at
the indicated elevations]:
Nofe:Retain the following two subparagraphs if specifying edge restraints fhat are staked into the base with
spikes.
2. Mount directly to finished bas�. Do not instail an bedding sand.
3. The minimum distance from the outside edge of the base to the spikes shall be '
equal to#he thickness of the base.
5
� _ _ _ _ . . _
US-paver overlay.doe
� _ - _ _ - - -
.v ,r.�� __. .,.r, ., � �: — ;� � : :: — -
u: .�._.
— . , :
,_. � ... � � ����--
� �, .. 3.04 �`'�I NSTALLATI O�N. �.�. w:° .�._�-� � ,._:. :: �. _._..�
A. Spread bedding sand evenly over the base course and screed to a nominal 1 in. (25 mm)
thickness. Spread bedding sand evenly over the base course and screed rails, using the
rails and/or edge restraints to praduce a nominal 1 in. (25 mm}thickness, allowing fior
specified variation in the base surface. '
1. Do not disturb screeded sand.
2, Screeded area shall not substantially axceed that which is covered by pavers in one
day.
3. Do not use bedding sand to fill depressions in the base surface.
Nofe: When initially placed on the bedding sand, manuaily installed pavers often touch each other, or their
spacer bars if present.Jaint widths and(ines(bond tines)are straightened and aligned to specifications with
rubber hammers and pry bars as paving proceeds.
B. �ay pavers in pattern(s)shown an drawings. Place units hand tight without using hammers.
Make horizontal adjustments to placement of laid pavers with rubber hammers as required.
Note: Contact manufacturer of interlocking concrete paver units for recommended joint widths: '
G. Pravide joints between pavers between[1/16 in. and 3116 in. (2 and 5 mm)]wide. No more
than 5%af the joints shall exceed [1/4 in. (6 mm)]wide ta achieve straight bond lines.
D. Joint{band) lines shall not deviate more than±�1C2 in. (±15 mm)over 50 ft.{15 m)from
string lines.-
E. Fiil gaps at the edges of the paved area with cut pavers or edge units.
F. Cut pavers to'be placed along the edge with a[dou6le blade paver splitter or]masonry saw.
Note. Specify requirements for edge treafinent in paragraph belaw. '
� G. {Adjust 6ond pattern at pavement edges such that cutting of edge pavers is minimized.All '
cut pavers exposed to vehicular tires shall be na smaller than one-third of a whvle paver.]
[Cutpavers at edges a5'indicated on the drawings.]
H. Keep skid steer and forklift equipment off newly laid pavers that have nat received initial
`compaction and joint`sand.
I. Use a 1�w-amplitude plate compactor capable of at least minimum of 4,000 lbf(18 kN) at a
frequency of 75 to 1 Q0 Hz ta'vibrate'the pavers inta the sand. Remove any crack�d or
damaged pavers and replace with new units. '
J. Simultaneously spread;sweep and compact dry joint sand into joints cantinuously until fulL '
This will require at least 4 to 6 passes with a plate compactor. Do not compact within 6 ft(2 '
m)of unrestrained edges of paVing units.
K. All work within 6 ft. (2 m)of the laying faee must shall be left fully compacted with sand-filled
joints at the end of each day ar compacted upon acceptance of the work.Cover the laying
face or any incomplete areas'with plastic sheets overnight if nof closed with cut and
compacted pavers with joint sand to preVent exposed bedding sand from becaming '
saturated fr�m rainfalL
L. Remove excess sand from surFace when installation is complete.
Note:Excess jointsand can remain on surface of pavers to aid in protecting their surface especral/y when
additional construction occurs after their installation. lf this is the case, delete the article above and use the '
article below. Designate persan responsibte for directing timing af remova/of excess joint sand. ,
M. Allow excess joint sand to remain on surface ta ptotect pavers from damage from other
trades. Remove excess sand when directed by[Architect].
N. Surface shall be broam clean after removal ofi excess joint sand.
3.05 FIELD QUALITY CC?NTROI
6
- US-paver averiay.dae
< ,, ; , ; , �- ,
�` No�e.�rt'as'e'to�erance"s on flatslopes=shoulc�=be rrieas"ured'wrth�a rig�d straigFi�ec�ge. 7'olerances�on � �
„
�,
_, ..
campiex contoured slopes shouid be meas�red with a flexible straightedge capable of cnnfarming ta the
complex curves on the pavement surface.
A. The final surtace tolerance from grade elevations shall not deviate more than±�3/8 in. (±�(0
mm)under a 10 ft(3 m)straightedge.
B. Check final surface elevations for conformance to drawings.
Note:For instatlations on a compacfed aggregate base and soil subgrade, the top surface of the pavers may
be 9/8 ta 9/4 in. (3 to 6 mm)above the final elevations after compactian. This helps compensate for possible
minor settling normai ta pavements:
C. The surface elevation of pave�s shall be 1/8 in. to 1/4 in. (3 to 6 mm)above adjacent ',
drainage iniets, concrete coilars or channels.
D. Lippage� Na greater than 1/8 in. (3 mm) difference in height between adjacent pavers.
Nate: Cleaning and sea/ing may be reguired for some apptications. See fCPI Tech Spec 5, Gleaning and
Sealing Interioeking Concrete Pavements for guidance on when to clean and seal fhe paver surface, and
when#a stabilize joint sand. Delete article be%w if cleaners, sealers, and ar joint sand stabilizers are not
appiied.
3,06 [CLEANING][SEALIRiG] [JQINT SAND STABILIZATION]_ '
A. (Clean][Seal�[Apply joint sand stabilization materials between]concrete pavers in
accordance with the manufacturer's written recommendations.
3.07 PRQTECTION '
A. After work in this section is compiete,the Gen�ral Cantractor shail be responsible for
protecting work from damage due to subsequent c�nst�uction activity on the site.
END OF SECTION
7
_ . _ __ __ _ _
,
. , _ ,
� __ -� — --- - - -
. _ �, ,. . . . �. � ;�� _
�
,�.,.....� , . _ . , .�,. • -- , ,:.. = _ ,�
. M,
O
._'
�
U �
�
z z t�-
o � � � Z
¢ � -' W z
J
Z � � u1 �" � � a
O � C� W � p � Q � � � `�
p� � Q Q W � OW Z �- �
Q
m � W z J � _ � U � m � Q � �
� ¢ d 0 � �! !n � � i� Cl J H- Ua '�'y
� � � o � F � � W
W_I W tn m J Q Q � C� W Z LLI t1,J =
W U W W � X z S�I�I�//\� Z Z � �� � � � tn IU-� �°°"
�QtLZ � W Q �
�� � c�j � p � .� c~n i °Q� F- u_ z J �
OW 0 = _ W >( " .� o � Z Ot_-
U� U F- � U` W � . •.i �= W W N d W � . � ?',,, F � �
•� "I W � � 0: �
i — � � W W J �
�
O �
'i I = �p � Q =
'r ' °' U' �j � � Z =
' :� W � �
`� . •1 .�I'( O.. � � �= 0 .
.1 . _ _' � O +� W � ��.
�"" LJ,! � �
� III W = � C] > �
,
• �.i — � FU.. I.ZLI '� � '-- �'1�
i 'i' � (dj � U� �- Q z
m
� o zQ � W J �
.lv 1.i � . tn � � �
I!) Z � �R �
, � 0 � tn (jJ � � V
W Z � � Cn � z
y V tn tn J � .�,/. ,�
L :-- D � `� zXO � .3. W
.Q. ' ' ° .��� Wm � W = �
� �'- ZO �
. . '� ' � U � O �
QV � Q �e� �
� � �-/
tnn F- u� u. u1 Ct. +
V � v� � � `+ '�7� .
Z � � � �
O z (/�
°wz � � a °� W —�
moo � � ►� W �
z = > zz � � W
� n °� > o `° � �
od � wn ° Ua �
� N M