The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEnvironmental Science Associates (ESA) 2014-02-28; Amendment 1 2011-10-27 - l I�J . ��I I � • ;. - .�� I , � I -- --- _ _ i I Environmental Science Associates esA�,ne�a,,,e,,,r,<,. , Amendment to Professional Services Agreement r:sn��.;��r,�,. z� n�9 Tais'k No. II www.esassoc.com _ ---- - I ��.�,E I 'I'HIS AMENDMF,NT ("Amendment") is made and entercd into this �3' �� day of akl�, 2012, by and be[ween Environmental Science Associates(hereinafter ESA), a California corporation and the City of Ukiah ("ClienY') and amends the parties' Agreement, dated 27th day of October , 20l 1 (Original Agreement). RECIT,4L5 I. ESA and Client previously entered into an Agreement for profcssional seivices. 2. The paities now wish to enter inCO an Amendment fo said Agreement under which ESA will perform additional services for Clieiit. 7'EXM.SAND CONDITIONS L Scope of Work The additional Scope of Work and fee covered by this Amei�dment is shown in Attachment A, which is attached to this document and made a part of this Amendment. 2. Price Paymei�t to F,SA under Yhis Amendment, including expense reimbursement, shall not exceed $ 22.961 . � Total new Contract Amount is $ 308,015 . 3. Effect of Amendment ' Except as amended herein,the pa�ties' Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN W ITNESS TFIEI2GOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment by their duly authorized agents as of I the day and year first above written. � Environmental Science Associates 225 s Street, ute 1700 I S n Francisco, CA 94104 , I � ( � f_ -_ �� ,j� ° � �� — ��/3�2 ��I E3y: �i�' _ �� By: � � I (Signature) ` (Date) Signature) (Daro) � � ;� � � - S�Y�'''f�lc�' Al� (�,��S� Name: �� Name: ! (Printed Name) ^ (Printed Name) � 1 / � �1�1^/�/�f2_ ��1f�C1 � /.�cic.� Title: ( /� "Citle: I Attachment A Scope of Work I � t'��1� � ATTACHMENT A — SCOPE OF WORK City of Ukiah Costco Wholesale Project EIR Amendment 1 Revised Traffic Study The traffic study prepared tbr the Ukiah Costco Wholesale Project shall be revised per the following tasks. These tasks are relatcd to the additional analysis discussed during the May 10'", 2012 meeting with City stafF. The primary purpose of thcse changes is two-fold: I) removal oF the Wahnart expansion as a cumulative project and 2) update of the project description to bring the building size in line with the most recent plans. These changes will most likcly bring traffic volumes down to a level where the signalized off-ramp alternative will operate acceptably. I'herefore, these additional tasks will focus on anatyzing and detcrmining the signal timing needed to accommodate these updated traffic projections. If this approach is successful,the traffic section will drop the roundabout alternativc as a mi[igation option. "1'he scope of work will include the following: I. A memorandum of assumptions (MOA) will then be prepared and submitted to City staff for review and approval. The MOA will include the scope, description of changes to the background traffic volumes(Baseline and Future)and updated trip generation assumptions. 2. I3ackground traffic volumes(Baseline and Future) previously used will bc updated to extract thc vaffic volumes generated by thc Wahnart Expansion project since it will not be moving forward. 3. 'I'he projcct vehicle vip generation will be updated based on the most recent project description. This process will include updates to the pass-by and divcrtcd link traffic as well. Project-generated trips will be distributed to the road network using the previous distribution assumptions. 4. Intersection Level of Scrvicc conditions will be updated for the entire shidy area using I the Synchro sofrware package (similar to the current section) for the following scenarios: • Existing plus Project • E3aseline • Baseline plus Project • Future • Future plus Project I il I Cny o1 Ukiah Cosmo Whaeseie arojec� 1 esn i 2i t isa �. Amenament No.1 May 2ot2 I __— . _ . _ . _ — _ � . � Atlachment A —_. I , 5. Intersec[ion queuing conditions around the'I'ahnage Road intcrchange and the Talmagc Road/Airport Park Boulevard intersection will be updated using thc Synchro and SimTraffic software packages(similar to the currcnt section)for the following scenarios: • Existing plus Project • Baselinc • Baseline plus Project • Future • Future plus Project 6. The mainline US-101 Level of Service conditions for the segments to thc north and south of"Palmage Road will be updated for the following scenarios: ' • F,xisting plus Projcct • I3aseline • t3aseline plus Project • Future • Puture plus Project 7. 'Craffic volumes for all updated scenarios along with project trip generation assumptions will be provided [o ESA for use in the air and noise analyses. 8. For any in[ersection that is forecast to exhibit adverse operation or queuing conditions, mitigation measures will be updated. For this scope of work, it is assumed that the mitigation plan will utilize the signalized alternative with the realigned 101 Sou[hbound Ramp which is currently presented in thc report. The mi[igation will also fine tune the signal timing needs. Each mitigation measure will identify the specific action necessary and expec[ed level of significance after mitigation. (Updatcs to the roundabout alternatives are not included in this scope of work.) 9. The draft traffic and circulation section will be updatcd with these modifications and submitted to tiSA for the Administrative Draft F,IR. The section will include updated exhibits showing lane configurations and Vaffic volumes for various scenarios,tabular summarics of the LOS and operational analyses, and a full tcchnical appendix. 10. Comments received on the draft trafflc and circulation section will be addressed, and the report tinalized for use by ESA in preparing the Draft CIR. W-Trans has assumed up to 6 hours to respond to staff comments on thc draft traf'fic study. 1 l. W=frans attended a meeting on 5/10/12 to discuss these issues. An additional meeting in Ukiah is included to be uscd as needed. Task 6 — DEIR, Amended fask 6 of thc scope of work, the Draft Environmental Impact Report, shall be amended as fol lows: Qty o(Ukiah CostCO VvTaesale Pmject 2 ESA 1211169 AmPn�manl No.1 May I01P � �� __ ._ Scope ol Work ' • 'I'he Noise section of the Draft EIR shall be revised to incorporate the changes in the dircet and cumulativc traffic volumes. • The Air Quality section ofthe DraR BIR shall bc rcvised to incorporate(a)changes in the project-related traffic volumes, and(b)changes in area and indirect sources related to the revised project size of 148,000 SF. • T'he Greenhouse Gas(GHG) section of the Draft E[R shall be revised to incorporate (a) changes in the project-related traffic volumes,and(b)changes in area and indirect sources related to the revised projcct size of 148,000 SF. • The Utilities and Public Services section of the Draft E[R shall bc revised to incorporate changes in utility and services requirements rela[ed to the revised project size of 148,000 SF. • 'fhe Hydrology and Wa[er Qualiry section of the Draft EIR shall be revised to incorporate changes related to thc revised project size of 148,000 SF. Changes to the other sections, including the project description and revisions to the traffic and urban decay sections of the Draft EIR, will be performed under the existing scope of work. I COSt � The total cost of the proposed revisions, including the traffic study, is$22,961. Of this,the I majority of the cost is attributable to traffic modeling.The attached spreadshect includes a brcakdown of the proposcd costs. Schedule Revisions to the traffic study will be completed within three weeks following authorization to proceed. Revisions to the DraCt EIR, including mobile source noise and air/GHG emissions will require one to two additional weeks. I � City of Ukiab Coslco VJnolasale Prolecl 3 ESA/21 H89 Amendment No.1 May]012 I I .. —_ _ _ —_ . _ _ _ _. l I I � TABLE 1: Amendment 1 Cost Proposal ESA Labor Detall and Expense Summary unmm. a,.may. w.i.. aorano xm.. wy.n s.w.i rom toi.i wal um4il0o�trlllon Minqfr $�A�eo[II Slefocl /.uoc] 9u0bbl $r1CMprOM1 [MGrpM1lrl $YOlol�l Mau�a t�porVrl[e '�. Hourl Billin Ralo $1G5 $130 $120 $105 $ 10'v .505 6 �EIPRevlsions 3 10 12 12 $ 4p95 2 2 § 380 41 S <,B>5 S 5 E TolalHours 3 ID 12 12 2 2 �1 Subtolals-LahorHouis $ C95 E 1,300 $ 1,440 § IRfiO S 4.495 5 210 1J0 § 980 $ OB]5 Percenl ol Ellorl�Labor Hours Onl ]3% 99.4Y 29.3Y 29.3% 4.� �9'/e ID0.0 e Pcrcen�olEllart TolalPra'ttlCasl 22e 5]% fi.3% 5,5% 0.9A OJ% 212% ESALeborCaslB S 4,8�5 . 3%COmmunlcelianFeeonLaborCOSI S W6 ESANamLabor Expenses Reimbursable Expenses S - ESA Epuipmem usage E Subla�al ESA Non-4bor Ecpense6 S Subconsultenl Coele�TraXic Study(ue AltacM1ment 91or tlelell) 5 1].840 TOTAL PROJECT PRICE 5 22,9fi1 i H:��sro.wieoi�v,o�a�u�sncai i...,oz�i i es.00.u.�.n con�o�o�r�aM=�Marouo�•�oium.miao:i ama��ne.r.sn i.w,a e,w�e I I II II I . _ : i I Table 1 A I Amendment 1 - Costco Subconsultant Detail . Sub�o�al To�al SubcansWtenit SubconsW�ant Fee@ SuECaneWlenl I Tesk NumbeN Oescrl tlon W-Trens ��s� 15 k Pro�ecl Cos� 'i Budget By Task i 5 ira�ec5tua $ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ 2,340 $ 17,940.00 $ $ $ Subconsultent Total $ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ 2,340 17,940 I I I I I I I I II i H:\\SFO�FILE01\Prolecls\SFC�2t lxxv\�21 H69.00�Ukieh Cosmo\01 Prajecl Managemen�Wmendi\casl_amentll xls�Subconsul�ani pelail II II I I _ — _ _ _ — _ ... . —