HomeMy WebLinkAboutEnvironmental Science Associates (ESA) 2011-12-14; Amendment 4 2009-12-21Environmental Science Associates ESA Amendment No. 4
Amendment to Professional Services Agreement ESA Project No. 209418
www.esassoc.com
THIS AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is made and entered into this day of December , 2011, by
and between Environmental Science Associates (hereinafter ESA), a California corporation and the City of Ukiah,
a general law municipal corporation ("City") and amends the parties' Agreement, dated the 21St day of December,
2009 (Original Agreement).
RECITALS
1. ESA and City previously entered into an Agreement for professional services.
2. The parties now wish to enter into an Amendment to said Agreement under which ESA will perform
additional services for Client.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Scope of Work
The additional Scope of Work covered by this Amendment is shown in Attachment A, which is attached to
this document and made a part of this Amendment.
2. Price
Payment to ESA under this Amendment shall not exceed $ 13,070. Please see Table 1 of Attachment A
for a detailed cost breakdown.
Total new Contract Amount is $ 458,298.
Effect of Amendment
Except as amended herein, the parties' Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment by their duly authorized agents as of
the day and year first above written.
By:
Environmental Science Associates
225 Bush Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94104
(Date) (Signature) (Date)
~.r
Name: ovlwgwo
(Signature)
e
, SSI
Name:
(Printed Name)
Title:
(Printed Name)
Title: r/
Attachment A
Scope of Work
ESA Community 2600 Capitol Avenue www.esassoc.com
Development Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95816
916.564.4500 phone
916.564.4501 fax
memorandum
date November 29, 2011
to Charley Stump, Planning Director
from Brian Grattidge
subject Scope of Work Amendment 4 - Walmart FEIR Hearing Comments
This memo outlines the additional work to be undertaken to respond to written comments received at the
November 9 hearing on the Walmart Expansion Project FEIR.
ESA will prepare a memorandum to provide the Planning Commission with a response to the substantive
environmental comments contained in the materials submitted by William Kopper. Each such comment and
response will be numbered. In addition, an assessment of the materials provided by Mr. Scalmanini and their
relationship to the urban decay analysis will be provided.
Tasks:
o ESA will respond to all comments not identified below. Specific items include:
o Eestimate transportation fuel usage related to project operation (based on the VMT assumptions
used for GHG analysis).
o ESA will clarify "treated" domestic water supply (comment 41). An estimate of pre- and post-
project landscaping water usage by applicant would be very helpful in this effort.
o Preliminary calculation of additional storm drain run-off amount and required on-site retention
capacity
o Note that an existing photometric plan is not available for responding to comments 19 - 21. ESA
will work with the applicant to identify available data.
o ESA will require the following information from the applicant and staff in order to adequately respond:
o Applicant (landscape architect) to respond to planter/tree suitability issue (page 2, para 1).
o Applicant to provide food product and typical grocery square footage, if known
o Staff to provide information on implementing policies and past Commission interpretations of
general plan consistency re: policies CD-17.1, OC-28.1, EG-5.1. OC-29, OC-25.1, GP-25.2, GP-
26.
o Memo will incorporate staff report information on prior conditions of approval (specifically
transportation improvements including bikeways and parking lot trees).
o ESA will engage its subconsultants to address the tasks below (note that if subconsultants have not
exhausted their FEIR budgets, it will be redirected to this purpose, but a budget augmentation may be
necessary).
o RTMM to review completed document and will take the lead on the following issues:
■ CEQA Baseline and prior conditions of approval (including tree planting, transportation
improvements and carpooling requirements).
■ "Requirement" to identify energy usage itself as a significant impact.
■ Pavley reduction (comment 45) (note that MCAQMD staff stated at the hearing that they
were satisfied with GHG and AQ analysis).
■ Level of detail needed for mitigation measure 4.10-2 and 4 (and inappropriateness of
delaying project approval until preliminary design complete).
o W-Trans will take lead on addressing the following comments:
■ 5. Use of Costco counts (review of Kittleson data, if available).
■ 9. Infeasibility of MM 4.10-2
■ 36. Planned bicycle improvements on Airport Park Blvd.
■ 46. Baseline-ESA to assist
0
0
■ 48. Impact of queue length
■ 49. Queue length (see 48)
■ 50. Explanation of the modeling method
■ 51. follow-up to comment 50
■ 52. Information used to determine feasibility of roundabouts
■ 53. follow-up to 52 re: feasibility
■ 54. mitigation feasibility
■ 56. Queuing issue (see 48)
■ 57. Apparent inconsistencies in modeling results
o ALH will take the lead in addressing:
■ 24. Items in food category
■ 25-26. Vacancies and real estate demand
■ Review of two reports submitted by Scalmanini
ESA also assumes that prior to potential project approval, that an engineer's estimate will be available for
Talmage/101 improvements. This will provide additional support to the FEIR's conclusions regarding
traffic impact mitigation at this interchange.
Hearing Attendance: The project managers from ESA, W-Trans, and ALH will attend an additional
hearing (for a total of 3)
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (916) 231-1276.
V/
C
0
CL
0
m
a
0
Z
U
a
C
T
W .E
J
m N
1- a
O
O
N
O
O
o
m
N
O)
V
d'
h
1~
N
c0
Cl)
M
r
~
`
r
a a
F
°
a
J
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
-
V3
-
V3
-
V3
V3
V3
-
V3
V3
V3
-
-
-
-
V3
V3
V3
69
V3
V3
V3
N
V
W
(O
0
y,
N
V
O
O
o
O
O
F-
S
O
O
O
a
i
n
V3
V3
V3
V3
613
dt
V3
V3
V3
V3
69
69
69
V3
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
V3
69
(Al
w
V3
V3
O
o
0
N
~
~
O
O
O
O
U
64
to
cm
N
o
0
0
O
`
co
V3
h
M
`r
M
a
D
O
V3
t
2
~
O
0
O
0
O
~
r
O
O
~
a
N
E73
V3
O
O
In
Ln
o
o
m
m
't
r
L
O
O
a
~
N
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
69
V3
V3
V3
V}
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
V3
69
V3
69
69
69
0
0
V
O
O
>
^
O
O
C
va
w
V3
ry
V
V
o
0
O o
_O
~
^
OJ
~
M
N
E a
a
V3
N
N
O
o
0
y
Lo
N
N
M
d
c)
Q
V3
N
V3
N
N
O
o
0
p rn
m W
O
0
r
N
O)
r
N
n
V
V3
V)
V
m
o
o
0
H
N
N
Lo
LQ
w
d
Lo
M
m
~
O N
V3
o
N
a
~
-
x
U
N
J
Q
0
N
y
G
~
d
N
E
U
c
~
E
E
chi
E
Z
z
O
U
T
m
v
>
>
N
o
od
3
c
o
r
m
w
aN
N
~
C
N
N
N
J
~
x
°
x
o
0
o
'm
r
o
_
c
a
E
w
m
-
m
o
o
s
o
=
-o
~
f-o
o
o
w
w
O
s
,
c
a
w
~
l
c
, C
N
W
W
~
N
O
O
m
m
o
=
m
O
~
c
o
o
p
N
U
m
U
°
'
x
t
-
~
n
a
a
M)C4
Vi) -l V3 691 64
ld
N N
a ~
o
Q °
c Q
m
E a0i
N r
Q ~
N Q
N ~
0
N
N
a
d
C
=
J
w
a
C
H g O W
ro o
y
0
y
.
LL
r
i
d
a O ca
K W J
-
W
ul N
U) 0
W Z
a
O
C
A a
W
J LU
E
a E
c
J O
U
Z o
0
W M
W U
O
N
64
d
a
O
m
E
t
A
m
d
.y.
O
U
A
3
0
a
N
0
w
0
b
w
r
7
0
M+
m ~ C
a..fS3
= C
(rD
s 'a o
c
a~
E 0
a acn
0
0
o
~
a N
o
o c j
LO
a
in a
0
0
N
N
C
a I
a
LL.
6a
EA
Iq
Cfi
1&
b4
64
fA
64
Qa
613
ca
613
63
6a
EA
fA
63
b
6&
69
fH
ER
EH
O
O
O
O
c
R,
W
cq
m -
o
V
V
O
G U
2
U.
EH
EA
64
fFp,
to
Ufi
64
(g
6a
Ef}
6a
EA
e9l
v;
b3
64
U3
b3
EH
bs
Ef3
6%
fq,
N
O
C
R
C
O
U
L
UI
U
~
m
a
~
~
O
V
m
C
G
H
o rt
ER
EA
O
O
O
O
LQ
LQ
N
N
.1
c.
u)
K3
EH
O
O
-
O
O
Cl
Cl
N
N
F
6s
H3
R
O
F
C
R
c
7
O
N
a
=
O
U
N
~
O
O
N
E
'
z
N
Y
VJ
m
~
ao
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
O O O O
00 0 0 0
N M LQ
b
C4 3
Ef3 E!? cm C4 CA
O O
N O O
H3 LO N
6a EH
U
N O
O n r
L O Lq
.C
N ~
0) 2
N
.O O
C Q
> (n
Y ~
O O
U U
N
a
U)
U) U)
C c
O
0 4
U) U) U)