Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-06-15 Packet
CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 June 15, 2011 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PROCLAMATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS 4. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Regular Council Meeting of 6/1/11 6. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Report Of Disbursements For The Month Of May 2011 b. Award Purchase Of 9000 Feet Of 15 kV, AL, 1/0 Cable In The Amount Of $24,263.21. (EUD) C. Award Purchase Of 6 Pole Mount And 3 Pad Mount Transformers In The Amount Of $35,791.41. (EUD) d. Report To The City Council Regarding Purchase For Repairs And Recovering Of The Air - Wall At The Ukiah Valley Conference Center From OMNI Concepts In The Amount Of $9,986.00 e. Report Of Acquisition Of Professional Consulting Services From EBA Engineering For Preparation Of Three Mandated Reports For The Ukiah Landfill f. Notification Of Purchase Of Two Digital Mobile Radios, In The Amount Of $6,559.80, To Motorola, Inc. g. Award Of Bid To Conduct A Russian River Watershed Sanitary Survey To Forsgren Associates Inc. For The Amount Not To Exceed $ 34,915.00 h. Approve Plans And Specifications For Rehabilitation Of Tertiary Treatment Units At The Ukiah Wastewater Treatment Plant And Direct Staff To Advertise For Bids i. Authorization For The City Manager To Negotiate And Execute A Lease Agreement With The Greater Ukiah Chamber Of Commerce For A Portion Of The Ukiah Railroad Depot Located At 309 East Perkins Street And Approval Of Corresponding Budget Amendments For Revenue Collected On The Lease j. Report To The City Council Regarding Payment To City Of Light Sound And Recording For The Sound Equipment And Sound Technician Services For The 2011 Sundays In The Park Concert Series In The Amount Of $8,820. k. Adoption Of Resolution Approving An Application For Proposition 84 Statewide Park Program Competitive Grant Funds For Riverside Park Development. Approve The Purchase Of A Slip -In Style Pre -Mix Asphalt Patcher In The Amount Of $34,632.00 Plus Tax And Corresponding Budget Amendments. 8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS 10. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK REPORTS 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:15 PM) a. Conduct Public Hearing On Urban Water Management Plan Update And Possible Adoption Of Plan 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Authorization Of City Manager To Sign Two Revised Letters Of Intent Regarding Comprehensive Efficiency And Conservation Measures Program With Honeywell International Related To Four Capital Project Components: Letter #1 Includes Replacement Of Water Meters, Installation Of Leak Detection Equipment; Energy Saving Retrofits And Refurbishment To Conference Center; Biogas Cogeneration At Waste Water Treatment Plant. Letter #2 Includes Ukiah Municipal Golf Course Irrigation Improvements, Renovation And Driving Range Creation 13. NEW BUSINESS a. Appointments To Commissions And Committees For Term Expirations And Vacancies Relative To The Airport Commission; Building Code Board Of Appeals; Parks, Recreation, And Golf Commission; And Paths Open Space And Creeks Commission; And Resolution Making The Appointments b. Verbal Report on Status of Sewer Fee Enforcement of Mobilehome Park Metered Multi - Family Sewer Charges 14. CLOSED SESSION — Closed Session may be held at any time during the meeting a. Conference with Labor Negotiator (§ 54957.6) Agency Representative: Jane Chambers, City Manager Employee Organizations: Police, Fire, Electric, Miscellaneous Units b. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (§ 54956.8) Property: 3495 Taylor Drive Negotiator: Jane Chambers, City Manager Negotiating Parties: City of Ukiah and David Koball and Amy Smith Under Negotiation: Price & Terms 15. ADJOURNMENT Please be advised that the City needs to be notified 72 hours in advance of a meeting if any specific accommodations or interpreter services are needed in order for you to attend. The City complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the front counter at the Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482, during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda. Dated this 10th day of June, 2011. JoAnne Currie, City Clerk Item 5a CITY OF UKIAH CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 6/1/2011 Councilmemb6t Baldwin arrived x;08 pm C. Presentation: Ukio Airport Day June 11, 2011 rej Airport Manager, "Wen presented the item. Presentation: "State of the Pavements" by Phil Dow and Nephele Barrett, Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG) Phillip Dow and Nephele Barrett, MCOG, presented the item. Councilmember Baldwin requested an agenda item be added to the August 15 meeting regarding an overview of MCOG's projects and programs including the Blueprint. Page 1 of 6 6/1/2011 4. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Regular Council Meeting of 5/18/11 M/S Baldwin/Thomas to approve minutes of Regular Council Meeting of 5/18/11, as amended. Motion carried by all AYE voice vote. Mayor Rodin Absent. 6. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION 7. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority (MSMWA) Annual Report, Budget Review Of Fiscal 2010/2011, And Proposed Budget For Fiscal 2011/2012 b. Report To Council For The Purchase Of Lasei fiche Maintenance/Support From ECS Imaging For The Period Of 6/20126t-,-4` t 19/2012 In The Amount Of $5,376.00 C. Approval Of Notice Of Completion -,,For � he Riverside. Park Phase One Grading Project, Specification No. 10-13 d. Notification To City Council Of T14"Purchase Of A Laboratory -Refrigerator For The Wastewater Treatment Plant Laboratory From -Helmer, Inc, A n' The Amount Of Daily Journal For Fiscal Year Inch For The First Insertion And is, Of The Same Advertisement, Control Server Appliance g. Report To Council Of Contract To HF;&H Consulting In The Amount Of $5,227.50 For Prep4r6 ion Of Fiscal Information'.,-- Related To Pending Discussions With Ukiah Valley Sanif6#§q DistrCi Rpgarding<©etachment Of Overlapping Service And Au thonze;Additional $600, Pius DMV Fees, Expenditure Towards The Approved Purchase Cif Used Utility„Truck 1nln:Amount Up To $24,000 With Funds Already Budgeted For F=i�s.cal Year„2010/2011 And Corresponding Budget Amendment, Bogging The Tota[ Amount To$24,600 Plus DMV Fees Irrigatien imnreyemeRts ReYl/'1yatinn And Driving Range Creation MOVED to New Business 11.d Authorize The Electric Utility To Issue A Rebate From The City Of Ukiah's Energy Conservation Program For The Ukiah Players Theatre HVAC Upgrade Project And Authorize The City Manager (Or Her Designee) To Negotiate And Execute All Of The Related Agreements Councilmember Thomas pulled T which will become 13d. Page 2 of 6 6/1/2011 MIS Baldwin/Thomas to Approve Item 7a -7h and 7j. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Thomas, Crane, Baldwin, and Vice Mayor Landis. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mayor Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. 8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS Benj Thomas speaking as an individual expressed his concern for the poor. Thomas is not asking for City Council action, but is calling for action from all, governments, citizens, and nonprofits. Thomas encourages a community forum to discuss the issue. Ernie Wipf, requested City Council reconsider decision regarding the use of wood instead of concrete for Anton Stadium. Lisa Mammina spoke about a hit and run at the cantor of Church and State Streets and hopes a flashing cross walk can be used at that `jocation. Mammina expressed her concern for road safety. JR Rose expressed his concern for; pedestrian crossing on Airport Park Blvd. and requested consideration of installation of�:0ross walks in that location.. Peter Good expressed support of reven§if he ,decision of concrete for Anton Stadium.. a. Award Of C Spbcification $344,979x25. ( .-. od instead of are scheduled for Electric Di§tdbutlOrt EFngineer Bauer presented item. Recommended Action(s): Award base brd end additive bid item number 1 for Gobbi Street Electric Substructure Project, Specification No. 11-06, to Valley Utility Services in the amount of $344,979.25. Public Comment opened 6:53 pm. Public speaking to the item: Lisa Mammina Public Comment closed 6:56 pm MIS Crane/Thomas to approve Recommended Action. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Thomas, Crane, Baldwin, and Vice Mayor Landis. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mayor Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. Page 3 of 6 6/1/2011 C. Approve Acquisition Of Professional Consulting Services From Green Valley Consulting Engineers In The Amount Of $20,025 For Design, Construction Management, And Inspection Of A Guard Rail For The Babcock Lane Bridge Approach, Authorize City Manager To Execute Amendment To Contract, And Approve Budget Amendment Deputy Director of Public Works -Engineering and Streets Division Seanor presented the item. Recommended Action(s): 1) Approve acquisition of professional consulting services from Green Valley Consulting Engineers in the amount of $20,025 for design, construction management, and inspection of a guard rail for the Babcock Lane bridge approach, 2) Authorize City Manager to execute amendment to contract, and 3) approve budget amendment: M/S Crane/Thomas to approve AlternatiVe'Counciloption, directed staff to work with the assistance of local engineers to` design a guard rail for the Babcock Lane bridge approach and reject the proposal. Motion carried; by the following roll call votes: AYES: Thomas, Crane,afdwin, and Vice Mayor ,Landis. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mayor Rodin. ABSTAIN one. M/S Bald r in/Thoma-s to approve ddommended Actions. Motion carried by the following roll „fall votes ..AYES: Th ,-'.,AYES: Crane, Baldwin, and Vice Mayor Landis. M/S Baldwin/Thomas to approve Recommended Action. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Thomas, Crane, Baldwin, and Vice Mayor Landis. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mayor Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. b. Adoption Of Resolution In Support Of A 1/8 Cent Sales Tax Measure For The November 2011 Ballot To Support Mendocino County Libraries Page 4 of 6 6/1/2011 Councilmember Thomas presented the item. Recommended Action(s): Adoption of Resolution in support of a 1/8 cent sales tax measure for the November 2011 Ballot to Support Mendocino County Libraries. Public Comment Opened 7:34 pm Public Speaking to the item: John McCowen. Public Comment Closed 7:38 pm M/S Baldwin/Thomas to approve Recommended Action. Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Thomas, Crane, Baldwin, and Vice Mayor Landis. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mayor Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. C. Approve City Council Response To Bullets? No Problem!" Report Titled: "Ricochet City Manager Chambers presented the item. A correction to the Narrative Summary of Required Responses #1, should ,be46.820. Recommended Action(s): Approve City Council Response to Grand . u' Report titled, Ricoch'et'gullets -- No Problem! dated February 19, 2011. M/S Thomas/Baldwin to approve the City Cauricil response to Grand Jury Report Titled: "Ricochet Bullets No.ProblemV It dtion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Thomas ,rarie, Baldwin, and Vice Mayor Landis. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mayor Rodin ABSTAIN `None. Manager Chambers ity Manager fo sign Mayor Rodin arnved 8:01 pm rTo Sign Two Letters Of Intent Regarding id Cartservafton Measures Program With Four Capitai'Project Components: Letter Nater Meters, Installation Of Leak Detection etrof%ts And Refurbishment To Conference At Waaste Water Treatment Plant. Letter #2 oursd Irrigation Improvements, Renovation as Stem 7i) ed the item. Recommended Action(s): Authorize of Intent #1 and #2 with Honeywell International. Public Comrnerit'Opened 8:07 pm Public Speak►ng-,to the Item: Peter Good, JR Rose, Lisa Mammina, and Susan Knopf. Public Comment Closed 8:27 pm Public Comment reopened. Public speaking to the item: Lucas Peaslee. Public Comment closed. M/S Thomas/Rodin to approve the LOI with modifications requesting detailed information regarding how determinations were made as part of their proposal and bring the item back to City Council. Page 5 of 6 6/1/2011 Motion carried by the following roll call votes: AYES: Vice Mayor Landis, Councilmembers Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Rodin. NOES: Councilmember Baldwin. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None Recessed 9:10 pm and Reconvened 9:19 pm. Adjourned to Closed Session at 9:19 pm. Reconvened in Open Session at 9:22 pm. 14. CLOSED SESSION - Closed Session may be held at any time during the meeting a. Conference with Legal Counsel -Existing Litigati art � Government Code Section 54956.9 Name of case: (Ukiah Valley Sanitation Ditrrcf'w. ,City of Ukiah, SCUK1057183 City Attorney Rapport presented the tteirt=which is a lava uit over a 1996 connection fee. The City considered a settlement proposal from the district and has agreed to accept it. The payment of this set'tf Ment will be considered dWring the URA meeting. Recommended Action(s)'aprove the settlement proposal in the amount of $300,000 plus interest. M/S Crane/Landis to approtre,acceptance ofAhe settlement agreement and release and to authorize the City Man ge'r. to sign th agreement on behalf of the City. Motion carried by the foli towroll, call votes: AYES: Vice Mayor Landis, Councilmembers Thomas, ,�d`rane, Baldwin, and Mayor Rodin. NOES: None. ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None;. Adjourned to closedsession arid -convene as_fhib Ukiah Redevelopment Agency at 9:24 pm. Reconvened in Open Session at 10:15 pm with no reportable action for items 14 b and c. 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:15 pm JoAnne M. Currie, City Clerk Page 6 of 6 6/1/2011 ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 'City 0f q-Ikiah, AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 7a June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2011 Payments made during the month of May 2011, are summarized on the attached Report of Disbursements. Further detail is supplied on the attached Schedule of Bills, representing the four (4) individual payment cycles within the month. Accounts Payable check numbers: 107225-107387, 107446-107554, 107556-107654 Accounts Payable Manual check numbers: 107388, 107555 Payroll check numbers: 107179-107224, 107389-107445 Payroll Manual check numbers: none Void check numbers: none This report is submitted in accordance with Ukiah City Code Division 1, Chapter 7, Article 1. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 10/11 1-1NewAppropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addit. Appropriation Requested Continued on Paqe 2 Recommended Action(s): Approve the Report of Disbursements for the month of May 2011 Alternative Council Option(s): N/A Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: City Manager Prepared by: Accounts Payable Specialist II Coordinated with: Finance Director and City Manager Attachments: Reports of Disbursements Approved: . J Chambers, City Manager CITY OF UKIAH REPORT OF DISBURSEMENTS REGISTER OF PAYROLL AND DEMAND PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2011 Demand Payments approved: Check No. 107225-107314, 107315-107388, 107446-107554, 107555-107654 FUNDS: 100 General Fund $175,368.25 600 Airport $56,775.33 105 Measure S General Fund $34,261.97 610 Sewer Service Fund 110 Special General Fund $42,546.69 611 Sewer Construction Fund 140 Park Development $119 840.80 612 City/District Sewer $84,917.09 141 Museum Grants 614 Sewer Capital Projects Fund $91,829.05_ 143 N.E.H.1. Museum Grant 615 City/District Sewer Replace 150 Civic Center Fund 620 Special Sewer Fund (Cap Imp) 200 Asset Seizure Fund $5_,038.38 640 San Dist Revolving Fund 201 Asset Seizure (Drug/Alcohol) 641 Sanitation District Special $33,744.08 203 H&S Education 11489 (B)(2)(A1) $40,000.0.0__ 650 Spec San Dist Fund (Camp Imp) 204 Federal Asset Seizure Grants 652 REDIP Sewer Enterprise Fund 205 Sup Law Enforce. Srv. Fund (SLESF) $2,500.00 660 Sanitary Disposal Site Fund $20,198.57 206 Community Oriented Policing 661 Landfill Corrective Fund 207 Local Law Enforce. Blk Grant 664 Disposal Closure Reserve 220 Parking Dist. #1 Oper & Maint $1 147.84 670 U.S.W. Bill & Collect $28,788.40 230 Parking Dist. #1 Revenue Fund 678 Public Safety Dispatch $1,104.22 250 Special Revenue Fund $42,975.92 679 MESA (Mendocino Emergency Sry Auth) 255 ARC General Operating Fund $2,091.59 695 Golf $47,337.84 260 Downtown Business Improvement $9,814.00 696 Warehouse/Stores $263.70 270 Signalizaton Fund 697 Billing Enterprise Fund $9,011.84 290 Bridge Fund $1,750.00 698 Fixed Asset Fund $130.02 300 2106 Gas Tax Fund 699 Special Projects Reserve $841.20 301 2107 Gas Tax Fund 800 Electric —$2,174,892.01 303 2105 Gas Tax Fund 805 Street Lighting Fund $9,086.50 310 Special Aviation Fund — 806 Public Benefits Charges $3,59836 _ 315 Airport Capital Improvement 820 Water $42,799.16 330 1998 STIP Augmentation Fund 840 Special Water Fund (Cap Imp) $15,000.00 332 Federal Emerg. Shelter Grant 900 Special Deposit Trust $11,797.61 333 Comm. Development Block Grant 910 Worker's Comp. Fund $716.49 334 EDBG 94-333 Revolving Loan 920 Liability Fund 335 Community Dev. Comm. Fund 940 Payroll Posting Fund $193,622.27 336 08 -HOME -4688 950 General Service (Accts Recv) $607.95 337 CDBG Grant 09-STBG-6417 960 Community Redev. Agency $1,734.75 340 SB325 Reimbursement Fund 961 RDA Housing Pass -Through 341 S.T.P. 962 Redevelopment Housing Fund $873.9.1 342 Trans -Traffic Congest Relief 964 RDA Capital Pass -Through 345 Off -System Roads Fund 965 Redevelopment Cap Imprv. Fund $116,957.41 410 Conference Center Fund $12,789.64 966 Redevelopment Debt Svc. 550 Lake Mendocino Bond-Int/Red $1,632,812.50 975 Russian River Watershed Assoc $18,255.80 555 Lake Mendocino Bond -Reserve ($648.22) 976 Mixing Zone Policy JPA 575 Garage $4,636.99 PAYROLL CHECK NUMBERS 107179-107224 TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS-A/P CHECKS $5,091,809.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS 51235-51422 TOTAL DEMAND PAYMENTS -WIRES & EFT's $87.00 PAYROLL PERIOD 4/17/11-4/30/11 TOTAL PAYROLL CHECKS & DIRECT DEPOSITS $674,432.29 PAYROLL CHECK NUMBERS 107389-107445 TOTAL PAYROLL EFT's (TAXES, PERS, VENDORS) $523,325.95 DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS 51423-51625 PAYROLL PERIOD 5/1/11-5/14/11 VOID CHECK NUMBERS: NONE TOTAL PAYMENTS $6,289,655.15 CERTIFICATION OF CITY CLERK This register of Payroll and Demand Payments was duly approved by the City Council on APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER I have examined this Register and approve same. City Manager City Clerk CERTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I have audited this Register and approve for accuracy and available funds. Director of Finance ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEMENTS 100 GENERAL FUND 15,970.51 105 MEASURE S GENERAL FUND 3,222.03 140 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 13,801.65 200 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 4,424.00 205 SUP.LAW ENFORCE.SVC.FD(SLESF 2,500.00 250 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 12,105.26 255 ARC GENERAL OPERATING FUND 114.07 260 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMT 9,814.00 410 CONFERENCE CENTER FUND 388.46 575 GARAGE FUND 575.18 600 AIRPORT FUND 23,442.81 612 CITY/DIST. SEWER FUND 5,141.25 614 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 2,000.00 641 SANITATION DISTRICT SPECIAL 768.25 660 SANITARY DISPOSAL SITE FUND 666.00 678 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCH FUND 431.56 695 GOLF FUND 823.52 697 BILLING ENTERPRISE FUND 3,000.00 800 ELECTRIC FUND 25,560.54 820 WATER FUND 8,961.13 900 SPECIAL DEPOSIT TRUST FUND 86.70 CR 965 REDEVELOPMENT CAP IMPR FUND 19,910.75 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 153,534.27 BANK RECAP: BANK NAME DISBURSEMENTS ---- ---------------------------- UBOC UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 153,534.27 TOTAL ALL BANKS 153,534.27 THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. DATE ............ APPROVED BY CITY OF UKIAH GL060S-V07.12 RECAPPAGE GL540R ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/05/2011 16:34:40 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AIR BP AVIATION SERVICES LOW LEAD FUEL CORE CHARGE REFUND ALHAMBRA NATIONAL WATER BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER BOTTLED WATER ALL -GUARD ALARM SYSTEMS MAY11 ALARM MONITORING ALPINE AWARDS YOUTH SOFTBALL T-SHIRTS YOUTH SOFTBALL T-SHIRTS ALSCO-AMERICAN LINEN DIV LINEN SERVICES ASFOUR/KHADER N CAR WASHES CAR WASHES CAR WASHES AT&T LIVE SCAN 4/19-5/18/11 AT&T MOBILITY WIRELESS SERVICE BAKER/ANN FITZPATRICK CARPENTER -HUDSON DESIGN BAY AREA BARRICADE SERVI RAKE/SIGNS DIST USE TAX BEATTY/JOHN SOUND SERVICES BLUEPRINTS & COPIES COPIES Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 20,748.76 AVIATION FUELS & LUBRICA 600.5001.451.000 135.94CR VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 600.5001.303.000 20,612.82 *VENDOR TOTAL 68.00 MISC SUPPL/EQUIP OFFICE/ 612.3580.690.001 29.84 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6150.690.000 29.84 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6150.690.000 127.68 *VENDOR TOTAL 65.00 BURGLAR ALARM MAINTENANC 612.3580.280.000 14.44 SUPPLIES 100.6112.690.000 1,237.39 SUPPLIES 100.6112.690.000 1,251.83 *VENDOR TOTAL 197.00 LAUNDRY SERVICES 575.5801.250.001 746.10 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 81.00 AUTO REPAIR & MAINTENANC 100.1915.303.000 30.60 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 820.3960.302.000 857.70 *VENDOR TOTAL 1,019.58 TELEPHONE 105.2001.220.000 43.42 TELEPHONE EXPENSE 641.7402.220.001 4,300.75 CARPENTER/HUDSON SECURIT 965.5612.920.002 73.63 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 0.25CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 73.38 *VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 EQUIP RENTAL FOR CLIENTS 410.6190.690.003 57.09 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3001.690.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 1 CLAIM INVOICE 099445 6044315 099446 VPRTV01624 099447 28628785109554 099479 28610756617819 099604 28610756617819 099472 31841 099605 254600 099606 254361 099607 CUST# 14305 099608 STATEMENT 099608 STATEMENT 099608 STATEMENT 099677 600978796 099609 287017917591X 099678 6.2011 099448 0269354 -IN 099448 0269354 -IN 099610 216390 099480 46464 PO# F/P ID LINE P 770 00002 P 770 00001 P 770 00005 P 770 00003 P 770 00004 P 770 00006 040265 P 770 00008 040265 F 770 00007 P 770 00009 P 770 00010 P 770 00011 P 770 00012 P 770 00013 P 770 00014 040307 F 770 00015 P 770 00016 P 770 00017 P 770 00018 P 770 00019 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/05/2011 16:34:40 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION BURPEE/ARLEN PRESSURE TESTERS CHAN FAMILY ENT LP/PAUL MAY11 OFFICE RENT CO/ANNIE SEWER LATERAL GRANT DAVIS/BETTY GREYWATER CLASS REFUND EBA ENGINEERING CORP YARD UST PROJECT EFAX CORPORATE JAN11 EFAXES JAN11 EFAXES JAN11 EFAXES ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE WALMART EXPANSION EIR EVERGREEN JOB &SAFETY TR FEB11 SAFETY MTG MAR11 SAFETY MTG FISHER WIRELESS SERVICES MAY11 RADIO MAINT GENERAL PACIFIC INC. C1SR NET METERS ELEC METERS NET METERS GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COM ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT GRAPHIC CONTROLS LLC CIRCULAR CHARTS GROUNDWATER PUMP & WELL REMOVE/INSTALL PUMP 48 Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 268.18 SMALL TOOLS 575.5801..440.000 1,300.00 PARK OFFICE RENTAL 100.6001.330.001 2,000.00 CITY SEWER LATERAL GRANT 614.3510.250.810 17.00 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOM 100.0700.521.001 12,105.26 UST REIMBURSABLE EXPENSE 250.3301.250.000 90.65 TELEPHONE 100.1915.220.000 25.90 TELEPHONE 100.1601.220.000 12.95 TELEPHONE 612.3510.220.000 129.50 *VENDOR TOTAL 00022 5,755.23 WALMART EIR CONSULT JN 0 100.1501.250.042 939.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.3733.250.000 939.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.3733.250.000 1,878.80 *VENDOR TOTAL 00026 250.00 RADIO EQUIPMENT SERVICE 678.2040.250.002 2,430.08 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3650.690.000 8,410.73 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3650.690.000 1,451.82 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3650.690.000 12,292.63 *VENDOR TOTAL 842.66 BLDG & GROUNDS MAINTENAN 600.5001.305.000 349.79 AGGREGATE BASE 100.3110.690.002 1,192.45 *VENDOR TOTAL 173.58 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 820.3908.302.000 3,750.00 WATER CONSERVATION SERVI 820.3901.250.005 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-VO7.12 PAGE 2 CLAIM INVOICE 099489 15698 099473 LEASE 099685 APPLICATION 099611 REFUND 099612 22523 099613 171478 099613 171478 099613 171478 099490 93167 099614 2920 099615 2943 099474 573 099449 1126111 099503 1126426 099508 1126081 099509 130642 099513 130729 099616 KE2155 099617 11-5121 PO# F/P ID LINE P 770 00020 P 770 00021 P 770 00022 P 770 00023 038696 P 770 00024 P 770 00025 P 770 00026 P 770 00027 039514 P 770 00028 039288 P 770 00029 039288 P 770 00030 P 770 00031 040221 F 770 00033 038523 F 770 00034 040275 F 770 00032 P 770 00035 P 770 00036 P 770 00037 040259 P 770 00038 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 3 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE HAWKINS TRAFFIC SAFETY S SIGNS 415.62 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 099522 12036 P 770 00039 HD SUPPLY UTILITIES LTD TAPE 88.74 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 099450 1713606-00 P 770 00042 POWER METER 6,805.62 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099516 1680629-00 040201 F 770 00041 LUGS/TAPE 197.16 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 099520 1713606-02 P 770 00043 TEST LEAD KIT 344.92 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099619 1679137-00 P 770 00040 7,436.44 *VENDOR TOTAL HD SUPPLY UTILITIES LTD WIREHOLDER 171.28 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 099451 1710274-00 P 770 00045 INSUL CONN 239.79 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 099618 1662838-01 040106 F 770 00044 411.07 *VENDOR TOTAL HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROPANE 22.08 SUPPLIES 100.3301.690.000 099620 25589297-001 P 770 00048 LOADER RENTAL 245.78 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099621 25554510-001 P 770 00047 STORAGE TRLR RENT -APR 70.69 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099622 25388863-004 P 770 00046 338.55 *VENDOR TOTAL HF&H CONSULTANTS LLC FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 290.00 RECRUITMENT & RETENTION 100.1201.250.001 099623 9710443 040122 F 770 00049 REV & EXP ANALYSIS 227.50 RECRUITMENT & RETENTION 100.1201.250.001 099623 9710443 040122 F 770 00050 517.50 *VENDOR TOTAL HI -LINE UTILITY SUPPLY MISC TOOLS 288.64 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3728.690.000 099452 1/614800 P 770 00051 MISC TOOLS 288.65 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3729.690.000 099452 1/614800 P 770 00052 STATE USE TAX 41.41CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099452 1/614800 P 770 00053 DIST USE TAX 2.51CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099452 1/614800 P 770 00054 SHARPENING TOOL 352.91 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3728.690.000 099525 1/614801 P 770 00055 STATE USE TAX 25.75CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099525 1/614801 P 770 00056 DIST USE TAX 1.56CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099525 1/614801 P 770 00057 858.97 *VENDOR TOTAL HIGBEE/JENNIFER GRADE T-3 CERTIFICATION 90.00 TAXES AND FEES 820.3908.630.000 099624 REIMBURSEMENT P 770 00058 HODGE/ALAN TRAVEL 3/20-3/25/11 89.10 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 612.3580.160.000 099679 TRAVEL P 770 00059 JENFITCH LLC METAL PRECIPITANT 4,252.13 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 612.3580.520.000 099625 7372 040250 F 770 00060 DIST USE TAX 9.78CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099625 7372 P 770 00061 4,242.35 *VENDOR TOTAL KELLY/JOAN TRAVEL 5/17/11 144.84 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 612.3580.160.000 099475 ADVANCE P 770 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/05/2011 16:34:40 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION KIRCH/DAVID TRAINING 5/12/11 KLAISNER/CRAIG TRAINING 5/12/11 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC SIGN KIT LAKE COUNTY ELECTRIC ELECTRIC PARTS DIST USE TAX RETURN PANEL DIST USE TAX ON CR LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SVCS LUCCHETTI/DIANN S.W.O.T. MTG SUPPLIES MALDONADO SR/LOUIS J APR11 TRAINING RENT APR11 TRAINING RENT MANNION/SHERI TRAVEL 5/15-5/16/11 MARSOLAN/KATIE STAFF MTG SUPPLIES MENDO MILL & LUMBER CO DEADBOLT MENDOCINO ACCESS TELEVIS BOARD MEETINGS-UVSD MENDOCINO COUNTY VOID CK #107137 VOID CK 4107137 VOID CK 4107137 SERAF PYMT MAR11 PARKING SURCH-CTY MAR11 PARKING SURCH-ST Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 30.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 575.5801.160.000 30.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 575.5801.160.000 141.03 TRAINING MAT & SAFETY SU 612.3580.690.002 1,513.75 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 6.96CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 1,397.44CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 6.43 DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 115.78 *VENDOR TOTAL 666.00 MONITORING& TESTING(PVT 660.3401.250.005 42.72 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3733.690.000 350.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 105.2001.160.000 350.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 105.2101.160.000 700.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 145.77 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.1601.160.000 160.84 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 40.22 VANDALISM REPAIR 100.6001.692.000 592.50 CONSULTANT SERVICES 641.7402.250.001 359,507.00CR ERAF PAYMENT TO STATE OF 965.5603.348.000 795.00CR COUNTY SURCHG, PKG ENFOR 900.205.070 2,385.00CR COUNTY SURCHG, PKG ENFOR 900.205.070 359,507.00 ERAF PAYMENT TO STATE OF 965.5603.348.000 795.00 COUNTY SURCHG, PKG ENFOR 900.205.070 2,385.00 COUNTY SURCHG, PKG ENFOR 900.205.070 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 4 CLAIM INVOICE 099680 ADVANCE 099681 ADVANCE 099531 1017194327 099453 5021716 099453 5021716 099539 5021980 099539 5021980 099626 18265 099682 REIMBURSEMENT 099627 268571 099627 268571 099683 ADVANCE 099684 REIMBURSEMENT 099628 82179 099629 115 099600 LETTER 099601 NONE 099601 NONE 099602 LETTER 099603 NONE 099603 NONE PO# F/P ID LINE P 770 00063 P 770 00064 P 770 00065 040274 F 770 00066 P 770 00067 P 770 00068 P 770 00069 P 770 00070 P 770 00071 P 770 00072 P 770 00073 P 770 00074 P 770 00075 P 770 00076 P 770 00077 P 771 00001 P 771 00002 P 771 00003 P 770 00078 P 770 00079 P 770 00080 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 5 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION MENDOCINO COUNTY GENERAL UVSD MAPPING MICROFLEX CORP #774353 GLOVES MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS INC SPRING MOIRS POOL CHEMICALS MOTION INDUSTRIES INC PACKING KIT DIST USE TAX MUELLER/DOUGLAS REGISTRATION 5/12/11 REGISTRATION 5/12/11 MURPHEY/COLIN TRAVEL 5/17-5/18/11 ONE SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS CONNECTORS CABLE RISERS PACE SUPPLY CORP PIPE LUBE DISCOUNT PIPE DISCOUNT PLUMBING SUPPLIES DISCOUNT FREIGHT PIPE MATERIALS DISCOUNT COUPLING DISCOUNT PIPE MATERIALS DISCOUNT VALVES DISCOUNT PLUMBING SUPPLIES DISCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 132.33 CONSULTANT SERVICES 641.7402.250.001 227.30 PRISIONER EXPENSE 105.2001.500.000 470.53 PLAYGRD MAINT & PARK AME 100.6001.302.005 419.58 POOL CHEMICALS 100.6130.690.001 42.80 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 0.15CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 42.65 *VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 575.5801.160.000 25.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 575.5801.160.000 50.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 210.45 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 800.3733.160.000 26.43 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 537.82 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 564.25 *VENDOR TOTAL 42.22 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 0.84CR SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 163.13 WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 3.26CR WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 76.13 WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 1.52CR WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 12.10 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6130.302.000 41.34 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 820.3908.302.000 0.83CR EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 820.3908.302.000 153.73 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 3.07CR SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 32.60 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 0.65CR INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 246.97 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 4.94CR INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 72.07 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 1.44CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 CLAIM INVOICE 099630 1011-2 099454 IN12066698 099631 9526 099632 22 099543 CA23-464651 099543 CA23-464651 099689 NONE 099690 NONE 099686 ADVANCE 099455 53503125.001 099456 S3503125.002 099457 021174750 099457 021174750 099458 021168713 099458 021168713 099459 021168538 099459 021168538 099460 021148007F 099544 021181187 099544 021181187 099545 021181191 099545 021181191 099546 021180525 099546 021180525 099547 021178200 099547 021178200 099633 021187118 099633 021187118 PO# F/P ID LINE P 770 00081 P 770 00082 P 770 00083 P 770 00084 P 770 00085 P 770 00086 P 770 00087 P 770 00088 P 770 00089 P 770 00090 P 770 00091 P 770 00128 P 770 00129 P 770 00126 P 770 00127 P 770 00124 P 770 00125 P 770 00095 P 770 00134 P 770 00135 P 770 00136 P 770 00137 P 770 00132 P 770 00133 P 770 00130 P 770 00131 P 770 00144 P 770 00145 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 6 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PACE SUPPLY CORP PLUMBING SUPPLIES DISCOUNT BATHROOM PARTITIONS FREIGHT DISCOUNT HANDICAP GRAB BAR HANDICAP GRAB BAR FLUSH VALVE SEAT DRAIN LF LAV SUPPLY CLOSET SUPPLY BRAIDED PTRAP DISCOUNT PTRAP FLUSH VALVE GRID DRAIN FLUSH VALVE HANDICAP GRAB BAR HANDICAP GRAB BAR LF LAV SUPPLY CLOSET SUPPLY DISCOUNT PLUMBING SUPPLIES DISCOUNT RINGS DISCOUNT LIDS, COVERS DISCOUNT PLUMBING SUPPLIES DISCOUNT HAND DRYER DISCOUNT PLUMBING SUPPLIES DISCOUNT VACUUM BREAKERS DISCOUNT DRINKING FOUNTAIN DISCOUNT PLUMBING SUPPLIES DISCOUNT PETERSON TRACTOR CO. BATTERIES BATTERY AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE 68.60 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099634 021187118-1 P 770 00146 1.37CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099634 021187118-1 P 770 00147 3,196.95 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099635 021136448 040133 P 770 00092 243.31 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099635 021136448 P 770 00093 68.81CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099635 021136448 P 770 00094 19.21 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00098 23.42 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00099 271.90 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00100 37.85 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00101 10.88 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00102 27.63 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00103 25.10 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00104 34.06 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 040133 P 770 00105 9.00CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099637 021149517 P 770 00106 34.06 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00107 160.34 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00108 10.88 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00109 122.39 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00110 23.42 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00111 19.21 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00112 27.64 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00113 29.73 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 040133 P 770 00114 8.55CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099638 021150361 P 770 00115 1,686.29 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099639 021150367 P 770 00116 33.73CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099639 021150367 P 770 00117 17.23 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099640 021184532 P 770 00138 0.34CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099640 021184532 P 770 00139 973.49 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099641 021166597 P 770 00120 19.47CR INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099641 021166597 P 770 00121 887.65 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099642 021154765 P 770 00118 17.75CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099642 021154765 P 770 00119 990.37 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099643 021148292 P 770 00096 19.81CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099643 021148292 P 770 00097 200.24 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099644 021185785 P 770 00142 4.00CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099644 021185785 P 770 00143 121.56 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099645 021185086 P 770 00140 2.43CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099645 021185086 P 770 00141 88.64 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099646 021166819 P 770 00122 1.77CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099646 021166819 P 770 00123 20.08 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099647 021188509 P 770 00148 0.40CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099647 021188509 P 770 00149 10,008.44 *VENDOR TOTAL 231.16 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 099461 PC490001315 P 770 00150 111.84 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 099548 PC490001336 P 770 00151 343.00 *VENDOR TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 7 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 31.54 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099648 9482248 P 770 00166 DISCOUNT 0.25CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099648 9482248 P 770 00167 DIST USE TAX 0.15CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099648 9482248 P 770 00168 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 10.19 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099649 9479281 P 770 00163 DISCOUNT 0.19CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099649 9479281 P 770 00164 DIST USE TAX 0.05CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099649 9479281 P 770 00165 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 154.73 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099650 9479269 P 770 00160 DISCOUNT 2.08CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099650 9479269 P 770 00161 DIST USE TAX 0.71CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099650 9479269 P 770 00162 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 42.88 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099651 9439477 P 770 00154 DISCOUNT 0.79CR INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099651 9439477 P 770 00155 DIST USE TAX 0.20CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099651 9439477 P 770 00156 WARNING TAPE 31.05 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099652 9456989 P 770 00157 DISCOUNT 0.29CR INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099652 9456989 P 770 00158 DIST USE TAX 0.14CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099652 9456989 P 770 00159 PUNCH SET 77.96 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099653 9433579 P 770 00152 DIST USE TAX 0.36CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099653 9433579 P 770 00153 343.14 *VENDOR TOTAL POPLAWSKI/KAREN FELDENKRAIS 210.56 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 099654 INSTRUCTOR P 770 00169 PUBLIC SERVICE DEPT. SEWER FOR ARC 81.40 UTILITIES 255.1640.210.000 099655 89690-2 P 770 00170 RELIANCE ENTERPRISES HEATER REPAIR 979.33 BLDG & GROUNDS MAINTENAN 600.5001.305.000 099656 17522 P 770 00171 DIST USE TAX 2.29CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099656 17522 P 770 00172 977.04 *VENDOR TOTAL RODIN/MARI TRAVEL 4/28/11 96.80 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.1001.160.000 099687 REIMBURSEMENT P 770 00173 SAFEWAY INC COUNCIL MTG FOOD 49.01 SPECIAL EVENTS/SUPPLIES 100.1001.690.000 099658 70438 P 770 00174 WCC CLIENT FOOD 138.46 FOOD & BEVERAGE FOR CLIE 410.6190.690.002 099658 70438 P 770 00175 ZIP LOCK BAGS 7.61 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 820.3908.690.000 099658 70438 P 770 00176 195.08 *VENDOR TOTAL SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEG EMC UPDATE-L GOODMAN 6.50 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 105.2101.160.000 099659 APR11-01082 P 770 00177 SHIELDS/AIMEE L APR11 TRANSCRIPTION 2,500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 205.2001.250.000 099476 CONTRACT P 770 00178 SHN CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANTON STADIUM CM SVCS 3,612.60 ANTON STADIUM CONSTRUCTI 140.6050.930.007 099657 74344 039479 P 770 00179 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT SPORTS & CYCLE BASE PEGS/PLUGS 133.51 PLAYGRD MAINT & PARK AME 100.6001.302.005 DIST USE TAX 0.56CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 132.95 *VENDOR TOTAL SPORTS SUPPLY GROUP INC BASEBALL ITEMS 867.61 PLAYGRD MAINT & PARK AME 100.6001.302.005 BASEBALL BASES 528.12 PLAYGRD MAINT & PARK AME 100.6001.302.005 BASEBALL ITEMS 304.49 PLAYGRD MAINT & PARK AME 100.6001.302.005 BASEBALL ITEMS 671.24 SUPPLIES 100.6112.690.000 2,371.46 *VENDOR TOTAL STATE WATER RESOURCES CT ANNUAL PERMIT FEE 1,008.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.5001.250.000 WDID PERMIT 433.00 RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.800.006 1,441.00 *VENDOR TOTAL SWITZER/MERLIN E TEAM BUILDING 4,424.00 CONFERENCE & TRAINING 200.2001.160.000 SYAR INDUSTRIES INC. ROCK/GRAVEL 813.41 ASPHALT CONCRETE 100.3110.690.001 DISCOUNT 10.85CR ASPHALT CONCRETE 100.3110.690.001 ROAD REPAIR 823.43 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 DISCOUNT 10.83CR INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 1,615.16 *VENDOR TOTAL TAYLOR/TRENT N. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 181.56 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE (FD/PD 105.2001.157.000 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 108.94 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 678.2040.157.000 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 72.62 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 678.2050.157.000 363.12 *VENDOR TOTAL TRINITY YOUTH SERVICES UTILITIES -GYM LEASE 215.76 UTILITIES 100.6110.210.000 TURF STAR INC BEDKNIFE 200.99 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 695.6120.302.000 MOTOR/SEAL 622.53 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 695.6120.302.000 823.52 *VENDOR TOTAL U S POST OFFICE POSTAGE 3,000.00 POSTAGE 697.1305.411.000 UKIAH FORD LINCOLN MERCU AUTO PARTS 11.55 AUTO REPAIR & MAINTENANC 100.1915.303.000 AUTO PARTS 302.98 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 AUTO PARTS 8.27 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 612.3580.303.000 AUTO PARTS 103.39 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 AUTO PARTS 313.92 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIRS 820.3948.303.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 8 CLAIM INVOICE 099660 176716 099660 176716 099661 93968958 099662 93966558 099663 93919568 099663 93919568 099664 SW -0032186 099688 SW -0032173 099549 1180 099462 0430539 099462 0430539 099665 431733 099665 431733 099666 REIMBURSEMENT 099666 REIMBURSEMENT 099666 REIMBURSEMENT 099667 013COU 099550 6703874-00 099551 6704571-00 099477 PERMIT #243 099668 21244 099668 21244 099668 21244 099668 21244 099668 21244 PO# F/P ID LINE P 770 00180 P 770 00181 P 770 00185 P 770 00184 P 770 00182 P 770 00183 P 770 00187 P 770 00186 040301 F 770 00188 P 770 00189 P 770 00190 P 770 00191 P 770 00192 P 770 00193 P 770 00194 P 770 00195 P 770 00196 P 770 00197 P 770 00198 P 770 00199 P 770 00200 P 770 00201 P 770 00202 P 770 00203 P 770 00204 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 9 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE UKIAH FORD LINCOLN MERCU 740.11 *VENDOR TOTAL UKIAH LOCK AND SECURITY CORP YARD 20.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3733.690.000 099669 STATEMENT P 770 00205 UKIAH MAIN STREET PROGRA JAN-MAR11 DID FEES 9,814.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 260.3701.250.000 099691 1ST QTR REPORT P 770 00206 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST PUMP REPAIR KIT 53.02 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 099670 92625869-001 P 770 00207 UNIVAR USA INC SODIUM HYDROXIDE 3,102.79 CHEMICALS 820.3908.520.000 099552 SJ -227536 P 770 00208 VEDOLLA JR/EDDIE CLASS/DANCE 128.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 099671 INSTRUCTOR P 770 00209 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERVICE 76.02 TELEPHONE 800.3733.220.000 099672 943130427 P 770 00210 CELL PHONE SERVICE 114.03 TELEPHONE 100.1965.220.000 099672 943130427 P 770 00211 CELL PHONE SERVICE 2.60 EMERGENCY CELL PHONES 100.1965.220.001 099672 943130427 P 770 00212 CELL PHONE SERVICE 38.01 TELEPHONE 105.2001.220.000 099672 943130427 P 770 00213 230.66 *VENDOR TOTAL WALLACE/DREW COVER REPAIRS 325.25 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 099673 1605 P 770 00214 DIST USE TAX 0.30CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099673 1605 P 770 00215 324.95 *VENDOR TOTAL WESTON SOLUTIONS INC SUPLMTL SITE SURVEY 9,230.00 AIRPORT PARK IMPROVEMENT 965.5617.930.001 099553 APR2011-04537 040230 P 770 00217 SUPLMTL SITE SURVEY 6,380.00 AIRPORT PARK IMPROVEMENT 965.5617.930.001 099554 APR2011-04517 040230 P 770 00216 15,610.00 *VENDOR TOTAL WILLOW COUNTY WATER DIST WATER -IRRIGATION ARC 15.00 UTILITIES 255.1640.210.000 099674 40351 1 P 770 00219 WATER -ARC 17.67 UTILITIES 255.1640.210.000 099675 40353 1 P 770 00220 WATER SERVICES 61.03 WATER FROM WILLOW WATER 612.3580.210.001 099676 ACCT 81154 P 770 00218 93.70 *VENDOR TOTAL WYATT IRRIGATION SUPPLY RETURN IRRIG SUPPLIES 81.02CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099463 244050 P 770 00227 IRRIG SUPPLIES 407.74 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099464 243825 P 770 00221 IRRIG SUPPLIES 363.06 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099465 244008 P 770 00224 IRRIG SUPPLIES 119.44 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099466 244051 P 770 00228 IRRIG SUPPLIES 99.66 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099467 244012 P 770 00226 IRRIG SUPPLIES 184.03 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099468 244011 P 770 00225 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/05/2011 16:34:40 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT WYATT IRRIGATION SUPPLY 140.6050.930.005 IRRIG SUPPLIES 18.80 IRRIG SUPPLIES 108.58 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 96.77 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIRS 1,317.06 Z.A.P. MANUFACTURING 612.3510.303.000 WHITE LEGENDS 21.59 WHITE LEGENDS 21.59 244235 43.18 Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 *VENDOR TOTAL P VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIRS 820.3948.303.000 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT 612.3510.303.000 *VENDOR TOTAL 770 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 10 CLAIM INVOICE PO4 F/P ID LINE 099469 243921 P 770 00222 099470 243975 P 770 00223 099555 244235 P 770 00229 099471 39022 P 770 00230 099471 39022 P 770 00231 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/05/2011 16:34:40 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 11 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE REPORT TOTALS: 153,534.27 RECORDS PRINTED - 000234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/12/2011 16:36:07 Schedule of Bills Payable FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEMENTS 100 GENERAL FUND 21,822.46 105 MEASURE S GENERAL FUND 3,874.35 110 STRATEGIC GENERAL FD RESERVE 18,397.50 140 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 100,392.77 250 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 30,870.66 290 BRIDGE FUND 1,750.00 410 CONFERENCE CENTER FUND 3,761.84 575 GARAGE FUND 1,543.20 600 AIRPORT FUND 337.62 612 CITY/DIST. SEWER FUND 15,248.58 641 SANITATION DISTRICT SPECIAL 15,853.88 670 GARBAGE BILLING & COLL. FUND 28,788.40 678 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCH FUND 250.00 695 GOLF FUND 945.96 696 PURCHASING FUND 195.33 697 BILLING ENTERPRISE FUND 1,623.95 800 ELECTRIC FUND 50,911.65 820 WATER FUND 4,490.28 840 SPECIAL WATER FUND (CAP IMP) 15,000.00 900 SPECIAL DEPOSIT TRUST FUND 3,852.91 910 WORKER'S COMP FUND 716.49 940 PAYROLL POSTING FUND 24,527.16 960 COMMUNITY REDEV. AGENCY FUND 1,528.00 965 REDEVELOPMENT CAP IMPR FUND 430.73 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 347,113.72 BANK RECAP: BANK NAME DISBURSEMENTS ---- ---------------------------- UBOC UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 347,113.72 TOTAL ALL BANKS 347,113.72 THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. DATE ............ APPROVED BY ... .. ...... CITY OF UKIAH GL060S-V07.12 RECAPPAGE GL540R ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/12/2011 16:36:07 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ABB INC GASKETS ACME RIGGING & SUPPLY CO MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES DIST USE TAX ACS MAY11 SOFTWARE MAINT MAY11 SOFTWARE MAINT MAY11 SOFTWARE MAINT AFLAC SEC 125 ADMIN FEES AGNEW/MARGARET FELDENKRAIS AIR EXCHANGE INC ELBOWS ALHAMBRA NATIONAL WATER BOTTLED WATER ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC TOOLS ARGONAUT CONSTRUCTORS RETENTION RELEASE RETENTION RELEASE ARROW FENCING TEMP FENCE PANELS FINANCE CHARGES B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY MISC HARDWARE MISC HARDWARE MISC HARDWARE Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 326.27 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3642.690.000 65.73 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 188.72 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 249.85 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 681.54 SMALL TOOLS 612.3510.440.000 5.44CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 1,180.40 *VENDOR TOTAL 195.33 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 696.1390.250.000 878.95 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 697.1305.250.000 878.95 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1301.250.000 1,953.23 *VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES(SEC. 940.200.730 315.84 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 23.93 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.001 37.46 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 600.5001.690.000 908.33 SMALL TOOLS 800.3729.440.000 15,000.00 ACCTS PAYABLE -RETENTION 840.202.001 30,870.66 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE-RETENTI 250.202.001 45,870.66 *VENDOR TOTAL 414.00 RAILROAD DEPOT RENOVATIO 965.5618.930.002 16.73 RAILROAD DEPOT RENOVATIO 965.5618.930.002 430.73 *VENDOR TOTAL 148.73 PLAYGRD MAINT & PARK AME 100.6001.302.005 17.77 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 49.45 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3728.690.000 215.95 *VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 1 CLAIM INVOICE 099737 ACCT#3903 099737 ACCT#3903 099737 ACCT#3903 099737 ACCT#3903 099737 ACCT#3903 099738 659665 099738 659665 099738 659665 099740 664647ER 099739 INSTRUCTOR 099741 28036 099742 50211311055595 099692 9750459 099744 COMPLETION NTC 099744 COMPLETION NTC 099745 71066 099745 71066 099746 CITUK 099746 CITUK 099746 CITUK PO# F/P ID LINE P 808 00001 P 808 00002 P 808 00003 P 808 00004 P 808 00005 P 808 00006 P 808 00007 P 808 00008 P 808 00009 P 808 00010 P 808 00011 P 808 00012 P 808 00013 P 808 00014 P 808 00015 P 808 00016 P 808 00017 P 808 00018 P 808 00019 P 808 00020 P 808 00021 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/12/2011 16:36:07 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION BARTHOLF/GAYLENE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE BAUER/JIM TRAVEL 6/13-6/16/11 BEELER/ROBERT MUFFLER DIST USE TAX PIPE REPAIR BLUE BOOK 2011-12 DIRECTORY CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC RECYCL'D WTR MSTR PLAN 2010 URBAN WATER MGMT PL CHEMSEARCH GREASE CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL SENSORS DIST USE TAX COVELLA/JULIAN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE CUPPLES & SONS CONST INC BENCHES SPEC 10-19 POOL REN. RETENTION 10a CURRIE/JOANNE TRAVEL 4/26-29/2011 DELL MARKETING L.P. OPTIPLEX 980 COMPUTER DELL OPTIPLEX 980 OPTIPLEX COMPUTER ENV FEE STATE ENV FEE Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 65.95 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE (FD/PD 105.2001.157.000 2,137.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 800.3733.160.000 80.14 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 612.3580.302.000 0.37CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 35.00 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 114.77 *VENDOR TOTAL 38.95 MEMBERSHIPS & MEETINGS 105.2001.262.000 8,082.00 REPLC MEDIA AWT FILTR UN 612.3580.250.007 2,018.82 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.3901.250.000 10,100.82 *VENDOR TOTAL 443.08 FUEL PURCHASES 575.5801.450.000 630.25 ELECT EQUIP 612.3580.302.004 2.90CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 627.35 *VENDOR TOTAL 319.65 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE (FD/PD 105.2001.157.000 898.53 FIELD SIGNAGE FEES 900.205.236 103,271.54 SWIMMING POOL CONSTRUCTI 140.6050.930.008 10,327.15CR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE-RETENTI 140.202.001 93,842.92 *VENDOR TOTAL 78.05 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.1101.160.000 1,302.42 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 410.6190.690.000 827.22 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 820.3901.690.000 827.22 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3505.690.000 4.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 820.3901.690.000 4.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3505.690.000 2,964.86 *VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 2 CLAIM INVOICE 099747 REIMBURSEMENT 099748 ADVANCE 099693 4893 099693 4893 099749 4901 099750 ORDER FORM 099694 0115814 099695 0115796 099751 336809 099696 8821-484964 099696 8821-484964 099753 REIMBURSEMENT 099754 CU11-001 099755 APRIL 099755 APRIL 099756 REIMBURSEMENT 099697 XF952XFW8 099757 XF931TRF9 099757 XF931TRF9 099757 XF931TRF9 099757 XF931TRF9 PO# F/P ID LINE P 808 00022 P 808 00023 P 808 00024 P 808 00025 P 808 00026 P 808 00027 040183 P 808 00029 040252 P 808 00028 P 808 00030 P 808 00031 P 808 00032 P 808 00033 P 808 00036 040268 P 808 00034 P 808 00035 P 808 00037 040234 F 808 00042 040287 F 808 00038 040287 F 808 00039 040287 F 808 00040 040287 F 808 00041 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/12/2011 16:36:07 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 3 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APR11 LIVE SCAN FEES 372.00 FINGERPRINT FEES 100.0800.615.001 099759 847026 P 808 00043 DFM CAR STEREO INC BLUETOOTH 304.49 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 099758 155851 P 808 00044 DORSEY'S AUTO REPAIR& BO TOWING-CASE#11-0990 95.45 TOWING 105.2001.250.007 099760 45657 P 808 00045 EEL RIVER FUELS LUBRICANTS/OILS 991.48 FUEL PURCHASES 575.5801.450.000 099761 97815 P 808 00046 NEW BARREL 25.00 BLDG & GROUNDS MAINTENAN 600.5001.305.000 099762 98359 P 808 00047 LUBRICANTS/OILS 70.91 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIRS 820.3948.303.000 099763 99663 P 808 00048 LUBRICANTS/OILS 70.90 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT 612.3510.303.000 099763 99663 P 808 00049 1,158.29 *VENDOR TOTAL FISHER WIRELESS SERVICES RADIO REPAIRS 180.00 R & M RADIO EQUIPMENT 105.2101.302.000 099556 209112 P 808 00050 MAY11 RADIO MAINT 250.00 RADIO EQUIPMENT SERVICE 678.2040.250.002 099764 606 P 808 00051 430.00 *VENDOR TOTAL FITNESS FIXERS TREADMILL SERVICE 112.50 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 105.2101.160.000 099765 1298 P 808 00052 TREADMILL SERVICE 112.50 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 105.2001.160.000 099765 1298 P 808 00053 225.00 *VENDOR TOTAL FOOD EQUIPMENT REPAIR SR SOLENOID VALVE 211.38 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3580.690.000 099698 21164 P 808 00054 FOWLER MOTORS INC./KEN VEHICLE PARTS/SVCS 217.31 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 099766 OUST #7496 P 808 00055 FRIEDMAN BROS HARDWARE HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 146.79 CIVIC CENTER M & R 100.1915.301.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00056 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 217.75 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1915.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00057 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 229.93 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1965.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00058 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 12.78 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00059 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 95.88 SMALL TOOLS 100.3110.440.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00060 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 30.46 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00061 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 676.41 CONCRETE/SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.004 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00062 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 71.43 TRAFFIC PAINT 100.3110.690.005 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00063 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 71.62 SUPPLIES 100.3301.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00064 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 942.84 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00065 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 22.69 SUPPLIES 100.6112.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00066 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 26.72 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00067 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 23.04 R & M NON-AUTO FIRE EQUI 105.2101.302.001 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00068 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 4.59 R & M NON-AUTO EMS EQUIP 105.2101.302.002 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00069 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 26.42 AMBULANCES 105.2101.303.002 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00070 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 132.02 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.001 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00071 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 21.68 SELF CONT'ND BREATHING A 105.2101.690.010 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00072 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/12/2011 16:36:07 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 4 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE FRIEDMAN BROS HARDWARE HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 1,503.57 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00073 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 16.73 BUILDING MAINT & REPAIR 410.6190.301.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00074 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 275.16 BLDG & GROUNDS MAINTENAN 600.5001.305.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00075 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 174.95 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00076 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 144.79 PUMP & MOTOR MAINT/PARTS 612.3580.302.001 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00077 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 188.36 ELECT EQUIP 612.3580.302.004 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00078 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 29.84 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 612.3580.305.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00079 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 137.74 SMALL TOOLS 612.3580.440.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00080 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 432.10 SMALL TOOLS 695.6120.440.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00081 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 96.10 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00082 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 19.20 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3642.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00083 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 171.23 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00084 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 27.18 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3650.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00085 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 432.90 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3728.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00086 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 217.72 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3729.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00087 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 108.74 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3733.690.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00088 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 69.23 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00089 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 92.38 BLDG MAINT & REPAIRS 820.3908.301.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00090 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 3.85 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 820.3908.302.000 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00091 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 85.62 WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00092 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MISC 221.50 FIELD SIGNAGE FEES 900.205.236 099767 CUST#5165 P 808 00093 7,201.94 *VENDOR TOTAL GRAINGER INC/W.W. SIGNS 97.22 TRAINING MAT & SAFETY SU 612.3580.690.002 099557 9511106941 P 808 00094 PUSH BUTTON/CONTCT BLOCK 45.37 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099558 9513812512 P 808 00095 142.59 *VENDOR TOTAL GUILLON INC CONSTRUCTION SOIL GAS BARRIER 18,397.50 CONTRACT SERVICES 110.3301.250.000 099768 1521.3C 040231 P 808 00096 HADLEYS INDUSTRIES SUN/SAFETY GLASSES 87.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.001 099769 3534 P 808 00097 SUN/SAFETY GLASSES 87.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES 820.3948.690.004 099769 3534 P 808 00098 STATE USE TAX 13.32CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099769 3534 P 808 00099 DIST USE TAX 0.82CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099769 3534 P 808 00100 161.46 *VENDOR TOTAL INDUSTRIAL EMERGENCY COU HAZWOPPER TRAINING 280.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 612.3580.160.000 099770 REG FORM P 808 00101 HAZWOPPER TRAINING 80.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.3110.160.000 099770 REG FORM P 808 00102 HAZWOPPER TRAINING 80.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 612.3510.160.000 099770 REG FORM P 808 00103 440.00 *VENDOR TOTAL KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPAN PAINT/SUPPLIES 131.47 BLDG MAINT & REPAIRS 820.3908.301.000 099771 910-UK6233 P 808 00104 PAINT/SUPPLIES 87.44 TRAFFIC PAINT 100.3110.690.005 099771 910-UK6233 P 808 00105 PAINT/SUPPLIES 506.82 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099771 910-UK6233 P 808 00106 PAINT/SUPPLIES 337.94CR SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099771 910-UK6233 P 808 00107 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/12/2011 16:36:07 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPAN PAINT/SUPPLIES PAINT/SUPPLIES PAINT/SUPPLIES KIRCH/LYNN SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND LANDSCAPES UNLIMITED INC PLANTS TAXABLE FREIGHT LEWIS/DAVID R RIGHT -O -WAY SVCS LIFE ASSIST EMS SUPPLIES DIST USE TAX BATTERIES DIST USE TAX EMS SUPPLIES DIST USE TAX EMS SUPPLIES DIST USE TAX STRAPS DIST USE TAX MCCARTY/DARRIN ELECTRIC OVERPAY SETTLE MENDOCINO COUNTY APR11 PARKING -COUNTY APR11 PARKING -STATE MUNI SERVICES LLC 4TH QTR 10 STARS NACHTWEY/KATHRYN A JIN SHIN JYUTSU CLASSES NEWELL/JAN TRAVEL 5/2-5/3/11 NORTH STATE STREET INVES MAY11 OFFICE RENT Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 18.50 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 1,378.58 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 800.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 2,584.87 *VENDOR TOTAL 00117 500.00 RECREATION DEPT. RENTALS 100.0700.520.000 1,075.43 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 130.50 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 1,205.93 *VENDOR TOTAL 00121 1,750.00 PERKINS/ORCHARD INTERSEC 290.9650.930.000 310.70 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.000 1.43CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 70.69 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.000 0.33CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 554.97 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.000 1.56CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 13.05 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.000 0.06CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 6.53 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.000 0.03CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 952.53 *VENDOR TOTAL 45,192.84 UNCOLLECTIBLE BILLS 800.3733.696.000 705.00 COUNTY SURCHG, PKG ENFOR 900.205.070 2,115.00 COUNTY SURCHG, PKG ENFOR 900.205.070 2,820.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 625.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1301.250.000 32.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 745.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 697.1305.160.000 612.00 OFFICE LEASE 641.7402.330.001 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 5 CLAIM INVOICE 099771 910-UK6233 099771 910-UK6233 099771 910-UK6233 099772 REFUND 099699 99190 099699 99190 099773 LETTER 099559 564149 099559 564149 099700 564778 099700 564778 099701 564569 099701 564569 099774 565225 099774 565225 099775 565121 099775 565121 099776 ASR 050411 099752 REPORT 099752 REPORT 099777 IN -0000024803 099778 INSTRUCTOR 099779 REIMBURSEMENT 099780 AGREEMENT PO# F/P ID LINE P 808 00108 P 808 00109 P 808 00110 P 808 00111 040244 F 808 00112 040244 F 808 00113 040316 P 808 00114 P 808 00115 P 808 00116 P 808 00119 P 808 00120 P 808 00117 P 808 00118 P 808 00123 P 808 00124 P 808 00121 P 808 00122 P 808 00125 P 808 00126 P 808 00127 P 808 00128 P 808 00129 P 808 00130 P 808 00131 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/12/2011 16:36:07 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-VO7.12 PAGE 6 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION NORTHERN AGGREGATES INC BASE ROCK OPERATING ENGINEER PUBLI RETIRED OPPERMAN & SON INC. MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS MISC PARTS PENNY'S TROPHIES PLAQUE/ENGRAVING PHILLIPS/JOHN M. ARBORIST SVCS PLEASANT VIEW DAIRY MISC GOODS RAINBOW AGRICULTURAL SER IRRIGATION/MISC SUPPLIES IRRIGATION/MISC SUPPLIES IRRIGATION/MISC SUPPLIES IRRIGATION/MISC SUPPLIES IRRIGATION/MISC SUPPLIES IRRIGATION/MISC SUPPLIES IRRIGATION/MISC SUPPLIES RAPPORT/DAVID J APR11 LEGAL SERVICES APR11 LEGAL SERVICES APR11 LEGAL SERVICES RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING K9 HEAT ALERT STATE USE TAX DIST USE TAX AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 437.44 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 2,568.00 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH INS. 940.200.724 CLAIM INVOICE 099702 37570 099781 86138MAY2011 192.42 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 099782 ACCT 16373 39.58 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099782 ACCT 16373 46.65 FIRE APPARATUS 105.2101.303.001 099782 ACCT 16373 523.74 FIRE APPARATUS 105.2101.303.001 099782 ACCT 16373 108.64 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESA 575.5801.431.000 099782 ACCT 16373 14.93 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT 612.3510.303.000 099782 ACCT 16373 869.88 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 099782 ACCT 16373 13.47 VENDOR LABOR & PARTS 820.3908.303.000 099782 ACCT 16373 80.62 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIRS 820.3948.303.000 099782 ACCT 16373 1,889.93 *VENDOR TOTAL 00152 039928 P 808 00153 38.06 SUPPLIES -CADETS 105.2090.690.002 099783 394937 150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6001.250.000 099784 LETTER 15.26 FOOD & BEVERAGE FOR CLIE 410.6190.690.002 099785 6651434 101.12 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6001.302.000 099786 OUST #2258 135.85 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099786 CUST #2258 106.52 K-9 OPERATIONS 105.2001.690.010 099786 CUST #2258 28.32 SMALL TOOLS 612.3580.440.000 099786 CUST #2258 3.89 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 099786 CUST #2258 7.59 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 099786 CUST 42258 149.42 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIRS 820.3948.303.000 099786 CUST #2258 532.71 *VENDOR TOTAL 11,045.85 MONTHLY RETAINER 100.1401.250.000 099788 4998 2,459.20 MONTHLY RETAINER 100.1401.250.000 099789 4998 1,528.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 960.5601.250.000 099790 4999 15,033.05 *VENDOR TOTAL 785.81 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099743 264772 57.33CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099743 264772 3.48CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099743 264772 725.00 *VENDOR TOTAL PO# F/P ID LINE P 808 00132 P 808 00133 P 808 00134 P 808 00135 P 808 00136 P 808 00137 :P 808 00138 P 808 00139 P 808 00140 P 808 00141 P 808 00142 P 808 00143 P 808 00144 P 808 00145 P 808 00146 P 808 00147 P 808 00148 P 808 00149 P 808 00150 P 808 00151 P 808 00152 039928 P 808 00153 039928 P 808 00154 039928 P 808 00155 P 808 00156 P 808 00157 P 808 00158 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/12/2011 16:36:07 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION REDWOOD EMPIRE MUNICIPAL JUNE 11 REMIF INSURANCE JUNE 11 REMIF INSURANCE JUNE 11 REMIF INSURANCE JUNE 11 REMIF INSURANCE JUNE 11 REMIF INSURANCE RICCIARDI INC/R.J. YE 6/30/09 AUDIT SERVICE RIDELL/MICHAEL PLUMBING EXPENSES RING PACIFIC, INC. 4/16-4/30/11 CARDLOCK 4/16-4/30/11 CARDLOCK ROURKE/PATRICIA POWER BOOST CLASS REFUND SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEG REGISTRATION SCHAT'S BAKERY FOOD/BEVERAGES INTERVIEW BOARD CC MEETING SHN CONSULTING ENGINEERS CM SERVICES ANTON STADIUM CM SVCS SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC SHEAR PINS SOLID WASTE SYSTEMS INC. DISPOSAL SERVICES DISPOSAL SERVICES APR11 GARBAGE FEES TAQUERIA MICHOACAN EMPLOYEE LUNCH Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 13,830.00 CITY CONTRIBUTIONS-DENTA 940.205.601 2,359.95 CITY CONTRIBUTION-INSURA 940.205.602 716.49 WORKER'S COMP. EXPENSE 910.1990.340.007 2,753.21 P/R DEDUCT -LTD 940.200.723 2,966.00 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH INS. 940.200.724 22,625.65 *VENDOR TOTAL 2,897.75 CONSULTANT SERVICES 641.7402.250.001 246.14 WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 1,285.80 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 612.3510.450.000 678.56 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 820.3948.450.000 1,964.36 *VENDOR TOTAL 45.00 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOM 100.0700.521.001 13.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 105.2101.160.000 2,110.48 FOOD & BEVERAGE FOR CLIE 410.6190.690.002 85.63 INTERVIEW SUPPLIES 100.1601.690.003 71.76 SPECIAL EVENTS/SUPPLIES 100.1001.690.000 2,267.87 *VENDOR TOTAL 1,422.50 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 1,028.40 ANTON STADIUM CONSTRUCTI 140.6050.930.007 2,450.90 *VENDOR TOTAL 156.60 TRTMT PROLE EQUIP REPLCM 612.3580.302.003 140.38 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 6.60 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 28,788.40 PMTS TO USW, DOMESTIC 670.4901.270.000 28,935.38 *VENDOR TOTAL 140.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 800.3733.160.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 7 CLAIM INVOICE 099791 MAY11 099791 MAY11 099791 MAY11 099791 MAY11 099791 MAY11 099792 7024 099793 REIMBURSEMENT 099794 C125667 099795 C125869 099796 REFUND 099798 ARII-01215 099799 STATEMENT 099800 STATEMENT 099800 STATEMENT 099797 74485 099797 74485 099560 900133517 099801 123334 099801 123334 099802 NONE 099804 101 PO4 F/P ID LINE P 808 00159 P 808 00160 P 808 00161 P 808 00162 P 808 00163 P 808 00164 P 808 00165 P 808 00166 P 808 00167 P 808 00168 P 808 00169 P 808 00170 P 808 00171 P 808 00172 039479 P 808 00173 039479 P 808 00174 P 808 00175 P 808 00177 P 808 00178 P 808 00176 P 808 00179 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/12/2011 16:36:07 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION THURSTON HONDA CLIP DIST USE TAX UKIAH DAILY JOURNAL LEGAL/PUBLIC NOTICES UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT PAYROLL URBAN TREE FARM NURSERY PLANTS WIPF/ERNEST M. DELIVERY SERVICES Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 12.72 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 0.05CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 12.67 *VENDOR TOTAL 188.93 PUBLISHING LEGAL NOTICES 641.7402.232.001 407.27 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 96.08 TRAINING MAT & SAFETY SU 612.3580.690.002 74.09 STATION CLEANING SUPPLIE 105.2101.690.005 94.84 PRISIONER EXPENSE 105.2001.500.000 134.24 SUPPLIES 100.3301.690.000 316.95 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 410.6190.690.000 1,123.47 *VENDOR TOTAL 12,155.20 SALARIES, REGULAR 641.7402.110.000 722.02 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 1,355.55 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-VO7.12 PAGE 8 CLAIM INVOICE 099803 18661 099803 18661 099811 ACCT #2117913 099805 I376883 099806 377112 099807 377180 099808 I377188 099809 I377410 099810 I377560 099812 P/P #35 099561 25402 099813 29905 PO# F/P ID LINE P 808 00180 P 808 00181 �ZiZ�iZ�II� P 808 00183 P 808 00187 P 808 00188 P 808 00184 P 808 00185 P 808 00186 P 808 00189 040281 F 808 00190 P 808 00191 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/12/2011 16:36:07 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 9 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE REPORT TOTALS: 347,113.72 RECORDS PRINTED - 000191 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEMENTS 100 GENERAL FUND 20,854.50 105 MEASURE S GENERAL FUND 9,888.45 110 STRATEGIC GENERAL FD RESERVE 24,149.19 140 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 1,610.09 200 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 614.38 220 PKG. DIST. #1 OPER & MAINT 710.30 255 ARC GENERAL OPERATING FUND 588.12 410 CONFERENCE CENTER FUND 4,120.59 550 LAKE MENDOCINO BOND INT/RED 1,632,812.50 555 LAKE MENDOCINO BOND RESERVE 648.22 CR 575 GARAGE FUND 210.17 600 AIRPORT FUND 31,108.96 612 CITY/DIST. SEWER FUND 32,557.59 614 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 2,000.00 641 SANITATION DISTRICT SPECIAL 273.50 660 SANITARY DISPOSAL SITE FUND 19,126.36 678 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCH FUND 277.18 695 GOLF FUND 37,075.75 696 PURCHASING FUND 17.95 697 BILLING ENTERPRISE FUND 336.45 698 FIXED ASSET FUND 130.02 800 ELECTRIC FUND 2,041,250.91 806 PUBLIC BENEFITS CHARGES 3,583.03 820 WATER FUND 4,328.22 900 SPECIAL DEPOSIT TRUST FUND 1,511.15 940 PAYROLL POSTING FUND 159,346.97 950 GENERAL SERVICE (ACCTS RECV) 150.93 960 COMMUNITY REDEV. AGENCY FUND 8.36 965 REDEVELOPMENT CAP IMPR FUND 27,725.33 975 RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED ASSC 18,255.80 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 4,073,974.53 BANK RECAP: BANK NAME DISBURSEMENTS ---- ---------------------------- UBOC UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 4,073,974.53 TOTAL ALL BANKS 4,073,974.53 CITY OF UKIAH GL060S-V07.12 RECAPPAGE GL540R ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. DATE ............ APPROVED BY .. .... ..... .... ....... .... —c-'.... CITY OF UKIAH GL060S-V07.12 RECAPPAGE GL540R ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 1 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE AIR BP AVIATION SERVICES JET FUEL 4/25/11 29,406.25 AVIATION FUELS & LUBRICA 600.5001.451.000 099846 6050635 P 836 00001 ALPHA ANALYTICAL TESTING SERVICES 636.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099847 1041423 P 836 00007 TESTING SERVICES 86.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099848 1041538 P 836 00008 TESTING SERVICES 89.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099849 1041540 P 836 00009 TESTING SERVICES 562.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099850 1041553 P 836 00010 TESTING SERVICES 5,214.13 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099851 1041678 P 836 00012 TESTING SERVICES 384.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099852 1041746 P 836 00014 TESTING SERVICES 163.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099853 1041755 P 836 00015 TESTING SERVICES 370.00 CHEMICALS 820.3908.520.000 099854 1041727 P 836 00013 TESTING SERVICES 5,176.50 MONITORING& TESTING(PVT 660.3401.250.005 099855 1041256 P 836 00002 TESTING SERVICES 532.00 MONITORING& TESTING(PVT 660.3401.250.005 099856 1041334 P 836 00003 TESTING SERVICES 5,291.50 MONITORING& TESTING(PVT 660.3401.250.005 099857 1041351 P 836 00004 TESTING SERVICES 619.00 MONITORING& TESTING(PVT 660.3401.250.005 099858 1041417 P 836 00005 TESTING SERVICES 3,285.50 MONITORING& TESTING(PVT 660.3401.250.005 099859 1041418 P 836 00006 TESTING SERVICES 4,213.50 MONITORING& TESTING(PVT 660.3401.250.005 099860 1041664 P 836 00011 26,622.13 *VENDOR TOTAL ANTHEM BLUE CROSS JUN11 INSURANCE PREM 33,360.27 P/R DEDUCT.- MEDICAL INS 940.200.720 099861 001336602A P 836 00016 JUN11 INSURANCE PREM 24,262.84 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH INS. 940.200.724 099861 001336602A P 836 00017 JUN11 INSURANCE PREM 93,993.58 CITY CONTRIBUTION-INSURA 940.205.602 099861 001336602A P 836 00018 151,616.69 *VENDOR TOTAL APONTE/GABRIEL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 223.09 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE (FD/PD 105.2001.157.000 099862 REIMBURSEMENT P 836 00019 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES FLOOR MAT SRV 264.36 CIVIC CENTER M & R 100.1915.301.000 099864 ACCT 37099000 P 836 00020 FLOOR MAT SRV 202.72 GROUND MAINTENANCE 695.6120.305.000 099864 ACCT 37099000 P 836 00021 FLOOR MAT SRV 147.20 BUILDING MAINT & REPAIR 410.6190.301.000 099864 ACCT 37099000 P 836 00022 UNIFORM SRV 212.14 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 600.5001.690.000 099864 ACCT 37099000 P 836 00023 826.42 *VENDOR TOTAL ARAMARK WORK APPAREL & U SHIRTS & EMBROIDERY 241.15 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 600.5001.690.000 099863 14213691 P 836 00024 AT&T 911 SYSTEM 223.51 RADIO EQUIPMENT SERVICE 678.2040.250.002 099868 707 911-7820 P 836 00025 AT&T CALLING CARD CALLS 0.46 TELEPHONE 100.1601.220.000 099865 2274515 P 836 00026 T1 TO INTERNET 8.47 TELEPHONE 100.1101.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00027 T1 TO INTERNET 33.53 TELEPHONE 100.1201.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00028 T1 TO INTERNET 37.76 TELEPHONE 100.1301.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00029 T1 TO INTERNET 33.53 TELEPHONE 100.1501.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00030 T1 TO INTERNET 16.72 TELEPHONE 100.1601.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00031 T1 TO INTERNET 25.17 TELEPHONE 100.1905.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00032 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 2 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AT&T T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET Tl TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET T1 TO INTERNET AT&T TELEPHONE AT&T DATACOMM SUPPORT CISCO A5A5520 AT&T STORE REPLACE PHONE -M RAMIREZ BALLARD/KATRINA CERT FEE -BUILD GREEN BARRERA/RAMON LEMUS FACILITY DEPOSIT BASIC CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS SODIUM BISULFITE BICOASTAL MEDIA LLC RADIO ADVERTISING BOTTLE SHOP/THE TRAINING LUNCHES AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE 33.53 TELEPHONE 100.1965.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00033 209.58 TELEPHONE 105.2001.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00034 92.24 TELEPHONE 105.2101.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00035 8.36 TELEPHONE 100.2201.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00036 33.53 TELEPHONE 100.3001.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00037 8.36 TELEPHONE 100.3110.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00038 4.22 TELEPHONE 100.6001.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00039 25.17 TELEPHONE 100.6110.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00040 25.17 TELEPHONE 100.6150.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00041 8.36 TELEPHONE 220.4601.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00042 16.72 TELEPHONE 410.6190.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00043 16.72 TELEPHONE 600.5001.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00044 8.36 TELEPHONE 612.3580.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00045 8.36 TELEPHONE 660.3401.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00046 25.17 TELEPHONE 678.2040.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00047 4.22 TELEPHONE 695.6120.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00048 8.36 TELEPHONE 696.1390.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00049 79.65 TELEPHONE 697.1305.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00050 58.71 TELEPHONE 800.3733.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00051 25.17 TELEPHONE 820.3901.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00052 16.72 TELEPHONE 820.3908.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00053 8.36 TELEPHONE 960.5601.220.000 099866 2329182 P 836 00054 880.68 *VENDOR TOTAL 113.87 TELEPHONE EXPENSE 641.7402.220.001 099867 707 462-4429 P 836 00055 1,141.55 ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AGRE 100.1965.250.001 099703 329-061656 040298 F 836 00056 515.48 PRISIONER EXPENSE 105.2001.500.000 099953 ON HOLD TRANS P 836 00057 50.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.2201.160.000 099869 REIMBURSEMENT P 836 00058 400.00 SUN HOUSE MEETING RENTAL 100.0700.530.003 099870 REFUND P 836 00059 4,490.27 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 612.3580.520.000 099704 SI5863759 P 836 00060 200.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 965.5616.690.000 099871 1241 P 836 00061 182.01 MEMBERSHIPS & MEETINGS 105.2101.262.000 099705 59338 P 836 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 3 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE BUCKLES-SMITH PROSOFT COMM. MODULE 2,078.18 ELECT EQUIP 612.3580.302.004 099814 1141848-00 040296 F 836 00063 BUSINESS CARD MEM MODULES, DRIVES 454.93 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 105.2001.302.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00064 IMPELLER 1,404.51 TRTMT PROCE EQUIP REPLCM 612.3580.302.003 099872 00451381 P 836 00065 WINDOW KIT 140.60 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00066 BOOKS 182.70 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 100.3001.231.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00067 USB ADAPTER 60.61 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1965.690.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00068 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE 19.95 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3733.690.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00069 BAGS 164.90 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3733.690.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00070 MARKING WHISKERS 127.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3729.690.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00071 SHADE CLOTH 325.14 FIELD SIGNAGE FEES 900.205.236 099872 00451381 P 836 00072 WRIST BANDS 798.33 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6114.690.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00073 VIDEO TUNER CARD 130.49 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1965.690.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00074 FUSES 921.41 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099872 00451381 P 836 00075 LEAD PRIMERS 1,293.34 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.002 099872 00451381 P 836 00076 STATE USE TAX 232.66CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099872 00451381 P 836 00077 DIST USE TAX 25.69CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099872 00451381 P 836 00078 SKYPE CONFERENCE 20.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1965.690.000 099873 37475565 P 836 00091 KVM SWITCHES 404.52 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1965.690.000 099873 37475565 P 836 00092 SERVER MODULES 490.91 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1965.690.000 099873 37475565 P 836 00093 REGIST/S BUTLER 399.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXP 100.1965.160.000 099873 37475565 P 836 00094 MEALS/SOFTWARE TRIP 130.02 EQUIPMENT 698.1301.800.000 099874 01808013 P 836 00086 REGIST/S MANNION 215.98 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.1601.160.000 099875 02082818 P 836 00087 REGIST/M HARRIS 638.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.1601.160.000 099875 02082818 P 836 00088 LODGING/M HARRIS 128.83 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 100.1601.160.000 099875 02082818 P 836 00089 CITY/CO LUNCH MEETING 30.05 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1601.690.000 099875 02082818 P 836 00090 SLINGS 254.96 DEPARTMENT FIREARMS 105.2001.250.006 099876 01776939 P 836 00079 AMMO BLANKS 203.81 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.002 099876 01776939 P 836 00080 AMMO BLANKS 277.04 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.002 099876 01776939 P 836 00081 STORAGE CABINET 338.74 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.002 099876 01776939 P 836 00082 LUNCH-FIRE & CM 46.23 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.001 099876 01776939 P 836 00083 STATE USE TAX 71.50CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099876 01776939 P 836 00084 DIST USE TAX 4.33CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099876 01776939 P 836 00085 9,267.82 *VENDOR TOTAL CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOY JUN11 HEALTH INSUR 1,617.36 PR DEDUCT-PERS INSURANCE 940.200.729 099877 H2001060485000 P 836 00095 JUN11 HEALTH INSUR 3,090.77 CITY CONTRIBUTION-INSURA 940.205.602 099877 H2001060485000 P 836 00096 JUN11 HEALTH INSUR 22.07CR PERS ADMIN EXPENSE 940.200.735 099877 H2001060485000 P 836 00097 JUN11 HEALTH INSUR 210.46 PERS ADMIN EXPENSE 940.200.735 099877 H2001060485000 P 836 00098 4,896.52 *VENDOR TOTAL CENTRAL ELECTRIC MFG CO 15KV SWITCHGEAR/BLDG OSS 1,786,790.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099878 92530002627A 039750 P 836 00099 15KV SWITCHGEAR/BLDG OSS 7,023.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099878 92530002627A 039750 P 836 00100 15KV SWITCHGEAR/BLDG OSS 3,198.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099878 92530002627A 039750 P 836 00101 RETENTION 179,701.1OCR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE-RETENTI 800.202.001 099878 92530002627A P 836 00102 1,617,309.90 *VENDOR TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-VO7.12 PAGE 4 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSIN FUEL 455.21 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 105.2001.450.000 099879 7898197277 P 836 00103 CLARK PEST CONTROL PEST SRV/HYDRO 74.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.5536.250.000 099815 11-737115 P 836 00108 PEST SRVS/CORP YARD 23.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.3728.250.000 099993 11-715335 P 836 00104 PEST SRVS/CORP YARD 23.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.3729.250.000 099993 11-715335 P 836 00105 PEST SRVS/CORP YARD 23.75 WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 099993 11-715335 P 836 00106 PEST SRVS/CORP YARD 23.75 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 099993 11-715335 P 836 00107 169.00 *VENDOR TOTAL COGGINS/JOE MAC SAFE KEY 38.01 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099821 1804 P 836 00110 LOCK/KEY SERVICES 220.00 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099822 1798 P 836 00109 258.01 *VENDOR TOTAL COMMERICAL POOL SYSTEMS REAGENTS, TUBES 91.23 POOL CHEMICALS 100.6130.690.001 099880 1103036 P 836 00111 DIST USE TAX 0.38CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099880 1103036 P 836 00112 90.85 *VENDOR TOTAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CEMENT 16.46 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099562 8821-485381 P 836 00119 DIST USE TAX 0.08CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099562 8821-485381 P 836 00120 6" CONDUIT 513.84 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099563 8821-485312 040286 P 836 00113 4" CONDUIT 374.43 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099563 8821-485312 040286 P 836 00114 4" 90 DEG ELBOW 221.42 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099563 8821-485312 040286 P 836 00115 4" COUPLINGS 23.40 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099563 8821-485312 040286 P 836 00116 4" 45 DEG ELBOWS 70.14 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099563 8821-485312 040286 P 836 00117 DIST USE TAX 5.53CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099563 8821-485312 P 836 00118 150OW LAMPS 582.17 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6115.690.000 099817 8821-485428 P 836 00121 DIST USE TAX 2.68CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099817 8821-485428 P 836 00122 1,793.57 *VENDOR TOTAL CRAWFORD/STEVEN C. REFLECTORS 32.63 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099706 2011147 P 836 00124 REFLECTORS 16.31 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099707 2011145 P 836 00123 48.94 *VENDOR TOTAL CROOK/CEDRIC UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1,000.00 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE (FD/PD 105.2001.157.000 099881 REIMBURSEMENT P 836 00125 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES CHEMICALS 344.74 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099708 203037 P 836 00126 CHEMICALS 163.13 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099709 203175 P 836 00127 CHEMICALS 35.34 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099710 203181 P 836 00128 543.21 *VENDOR TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 5 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE CWEA CERT RENEWAL/G SMITH 76.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 612.3580.260.000 099882 CERT #2076219 P 836 00129 DAVIS HAMMON & CO AUDIT SVCS 2010 2,600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1301.250.000 099818 ACCT#26035 039153 P 836 00130 DEEP VALLEY SECURITY "24 MAY 2011 MONITORING 27.29 BURGLAR ALARM MAINT. 100.3110.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00131 MAY 2011 MONITORING 28.64 BURGLAR ALARM MAINTENANC 820.3901.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00132 MAY 2011 MONITORING 28.64 BURGLAR ALARM MAINTENANC 612.3505.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00133 MAY 2011 MONITORING 24.47 BURGLAR ALARM MAINTENANC 800.3733.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00134 MAY 2011 MONITORING 128.83 BURGLAR ALARM MAINT. 100.6150.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00135 MAY 2011 MONITORING 28.46 BURGLAR ALARM MAINT. 695.6120.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00136 MAY 2011 MONITORING 28.46 SECURITY EXPENSE 100.6001.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00137 MAY 2011 MONITORING 22.95 FIELD ALARM MONITORING 100.6115.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00138 MAY 2011 MONITORING 42.96 CIVIC CENTER ALARMS 100.1915.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00139 MAY 2011 MONITORING 41.88 BURGLAR ALARM MAINT. 410.6190.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00140 MAY 2011 MONITORING 44.92 BURGLAR ALARM MAINTENANC 820.3908.280.000 099728 202765 P 836 00141 447.50 *VENDOR TOTAL EFAX CORPORATE APR11 EFAXES 90.65 TELEPHONE 100.1965.220.000 099883 187961 P 836 00142 APR11 EFAXES 25.90 TELEPHONE 100.1601.220.000 099883 187961 P 836 00143 APR11 EFAXES 12.95 TELEPHONE 612.3510.220.000 099883 187961 P 836 00144 129.50 *VENDOR TOTAL EFFICIENCY SERVICES GROU APR11 ADMIN FEE 3,583.03 PUB BENEFITS PROGR MGMT 806.3765.250.007 099819 1367 P 836 00145 EMPIRE WASTE MANAGEMENT PORTOLET SERVICE 218.99 SUPPLIES 100.6112.690.000 099884 799-1616-25611 P 836 00151 PORTOLET SERVICE 139.00 PORT -O -LETS 100.6001.250.002 099884 799-1616-25611 P 836 00152 APR11 PORTOLET 60.67 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.3642.250.000 099885 799-1633-25616 P 836 00153 MAY11 PORTOLET 60.67 ANNUAL MAINT/PLANT & EQU 800.5536.250.003 099886 799-1004-25610 P 836 00146 APR11 PORTOLETS 120.35 PORT -O -LETS 100.6001.250.002 099887 799-1579-25611 P 836 00150 APR11 PORTOLETS 120.35 PORT -O -LETS 100.6001.250.002 099888 799-1577-25615 P 836 00148 APR11 PORTOLETS 120.41 PORT -O -LETS 100.6001.250.002 099889 799-1578-25613 P 836 00149 APR11 PORTOLETS 123.35 PORT -O -LETS 100.6001.250.002 099890 799-1664-25611 P 836 00154 APR11 PORTOLETS 65.93 PORT -O -LETS 100.6001.250.002 099891 799-157-25617 P 836 00147 APR11 PORTOLETS 116.49 PORT -O -LETS 100.6001.250.002 099892 799-17-25613 P 836 00155 1,146.21 *VENDOR TOTAL FASTENAL FASTENERS 11.11 BLDG & GROUNDS MAINTENAN 600.5001.305.000 099893 CAUKA2152 P 836 00156 FLEETPRIDE PARTS 8.58 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 695.6120.302.000 099894 ACCT 726408 P 836 00157 PARTS 25.76 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 099894 ACCT 726408 P 836 00158 PARTS 6.46 VENDOR LABOR & PARTS 820.3908.303.000 099894 ACCT 726408 P 836 00159 DIST USE TAX 0.19CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099894 ACCT 726408 P 836 00160 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-VO7.12 PAGE 6 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION FLEETPRIDE FULWIDER OUTDOOR POWER E PARTS GARGER/DWIGHT CLASS -AIKIDO GCS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIP CABLE GROENIGER & CO. 3/4 X 2 METER COUPLER 3/4 X 2 1/2 MTR CPLR ANGLE STOP 1 1/2" ANGLE STOP 2" COUPLINGS BALL CORP 2" METER COUPLINGS STOP STR BALL MTR VLV 3/4" CLAMP 1" CLAMP 1" SS CLAMP 1 1/2" CLAMP 2" CLAMP ANGLE STOP 1" X 3/4 HALL/JESSICA CLASSES-BALLET/TAP CLASSES -HIP HOP HARTFORD RETIREE PREMIUM JUN11 HEALTH INSURANCE HD SUPPLY UTILITIES LTD SPLICES HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL SKIDSTEER RENTAL MAY11 STOR TRAILER RENT HOWARD CONSTRUCTION CO/L CORP YD REMED INSTALL CHANGE ORDERS LESS RETENTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE 40.61 *VENDOR TOTAL 356.37 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 099895 8018180 P 836 00161 25.50 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOM 100.0700.521.001 099896 REFUND P 836 00162 118.41 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 099711 4103 P 836 00163 47.63 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099564 2023262-00 040292 P 836 00164 33.41 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099564 2023262-00 040292 P 836 00165 214.09 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099564 2023262-00 040292 P 836 00166 539.97 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099564 2023262-00 040292 P 836 00167 748.31 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099712 5047374-00 P 836 00177 405.94 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099713 3026027-00 040292 P 836 00168 33.41 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099897 5047313-00 040292 F 836 00175 188.41 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099898 5047295-00 040154 P 836 00169 190.20 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099899 5047295-01 040154 F 836 00170 393.46 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099899 5047295-01 040154 F 836 00171 196.73 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099899 5047295-01 040154 F 836 00172 135.50 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099899 5047295-01 040154 F 836 00173 150.29 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099899 5047295-01 040154 F 836 00174 374.97 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 820.131.002 099900 5047314-00 040292 P 836 00176 3,652.32 *VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 099901 INSTRUCTOR P 836 00178 64.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 099901 INSTRUCTOR P 836 00179 128.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 2,648.46 NON-EMPLOYEE HEALTH INS. 940.200.724 099902 5011 -JUNE P 836 00180 8.16 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 099714 1713606-01 P 836 00181 274.06 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099820 25594036-001 P 836 00183 70.69 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099903 25388863-005 P 836 00182 344.75 *VENDOR TOTAL 2,450.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 110.3301.250.000 099904 PROG PAY #3 039999 P 836 00184 24,382.44 CONTRACT SERVICES 110.3301.250.000 099904 PROG PAY #3 039999 P 836 00185 2,683.25CR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE-RETENTI 110.202.001 099904 PROG PAY #3 P 836 00186 24,149.19 *VENDOR TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/20/2011 09:09:59 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INTEGRITY SHRED DOCUMENT SHREDDING DOCUMENT SHREDDING DOCUMENT SHREDDING KENNEDY/RICK POSTAGE KIGHT/BRANDON GRAPHIC DESIGN/PUMPKNFST LMK ENTERPRISES INC SADDLE KIT STATE USE TAX DIST USE TAX LOCAL FLAVOR BAKEHOUSE UTILITY REFUND -210 S STA UTILITY REFUND -210 S STA MAGALLAN/ERIKA UTILITY REFUND MALONE/LINDA SEWER LATERAL GRANT MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO PUMP/GAUGES MENDOCINO WINEGRAPE & PROMO BOOTH MERRY MAIDS UTILITY REFUND MILLVIEW COUNTY WATER DI DATA REQUEST CHARGES MINZ-KAMMER/SARAH CLASSES-GREYWATER GARDEN MISSOURI TURF PAINT MARKING PAINT & MACH STATE USE TAX DIST USE TAX Schedule of Bil1S Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 28.50 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.000 28.50 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 678.2040.690.000 28.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1601.250.000 85.50 *VENDOR TOTAL 62.13 POSTAGE/SHIPPING 641.7402.411.001 400.00 PUMPKINFEST 900.205.219 519.38 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 37.13CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 2.25CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 480.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 2,761.60 COMMERCIAL LIGHTS 800.0830.710.000 6.51 ELECTRIC SURCHARGE TRUST 900.205.009 2,768.11 *VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 UTILITY CREDIT DAL CLEAR 950.115.101 2,000.00 CITY SEWER LATERAL GRANT 614.3510.250.810 185.29 SMALL TOOLS 612.3580.440.000 75.00 CHAMBER CONTR-TOT MEASUR 100.1945.250.001 75.93 UTILITY CREDIT DAL CLEAR 950.115.101 97.50 CONSULTANT SERVICES 641.7402.250.001 56.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 546.72 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 40.47CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 2.45CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 503.80 *VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 7 CLAIM INVOICE 099715 23069 099715 23069 099716 23068 099905 REIMBURSEMENT 099906 107 099907 11719 099907 11719 099907 11719 099908 CUST #58298-1 099908 CUST 458298-1 099955 100820-0 099909 GRANT APPL 099823 84066773 099910 5-1001 099954 100105-6 099911 99999 099912 INSTRUCTOR 099913 92613 099913 92613 099913 92613 PO# F/P ID LINE P 836 00188 P 836 00189 P 836 00187 P 836 00190 P 836 00191 P 836 00192 P 836 00193 P 836 00194 P 837 00001 P 837 00002 P 836 00195 P 836 00196 P 836 00197 P 836 00198 P 836 00199 P 836 00200 P 836 00201 P 836 00202 P 836 00203 P 836 00204 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/20/2011 09:09:59 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQ PARTS PARTS NELSON/TERRY PETTY CASH BOX REIMB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWE MAY11 POWER MAY11 POWER MAY11 POWER MAY11 POWER MAY11 POWER MAY11 POWER OAK VALLEY NURSERY TREES OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MAX PAPER PAPER REBATE OLIN CORPORATION HYPOCHLORITE ONE SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS TAPE INSULATORS ONLINE INFORMATION-SRVS APR11 ONLINE REPORTING Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 275.78 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT 612.3510.303.000 305.47 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT 612.3510.303.000 581.25 *VENDOR TOTAL 37.62 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 410.6190.690.000 54,730.00 NCPA POWER PURCHASES 800.3702.214.004 263,315.00 NCPA PLANT GENERATION 800.3702.214.003 40,378.00 NCPA POWER PURCHASES 800.3702.214.004 148,138.00 NCPA TRANSMISSION 800.3702.214.005 39,508.00 NCPA MGMT SERVICE 800.3702.214.006 147,942.00CR NCPA THIRD PARTY REV (SA 800.3702.214.007 398,127.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 119.59 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690..000 58.94 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1201.690.000 149.95 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1301.690.000 17.20 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1601.690.000 148.35 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1915.690.000 59.46 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3001.690.000 31.07 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6110.690.000 126.94 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2090.690.000 701.94 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 220.4601.690.000 76.81 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3733.690.000 1,370.66 *VENDOR TOTAL 27.38 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.1301.690.000 19.85 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 696.1390.690.000 10.26CR STORES PURCHASES 696.131.002 36.97 *VENDOR TOTAL 3,969.11 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 612.3580.520.000 404.39 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 313.22 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 717.61 *VENDOR TOTAL 256.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 697.1305.250.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 8 CLAIM INVOICE 099565 0066634 -IN 099914 66903 -IN 099915 REIMBURSEMENT 099992 006102-0511017 099992 006102-0511017 099992 006102-0511017 099992 006102-0511017 099992 006102-0511017 099992 006102-0511017 099916 CITUPS 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099917 1668963 099566 718680 099566 718680 099567 500770 099717 1402796 099568 53503125.003 099718 53512571.001 099825 329788 PO4 F/P ID LINE P 836 00205 P 836 00206 P 836 00207 P 836 00208 P 836 00209 P 836 00210 P 836 00211 P 836 00212 P 836 00213 P 836 00214 P 836 00215 P 836 00216 P 836 00217 P 836 00218 P 836 00219 P 836 00220 P 836 00221 P 836 00222 P 836 00223 P 836 00225 P 836 00226 P 836 00224 P 836 00227 P 836 00228 P 836 00229 P 836 00230 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 9 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE P. G. & E. COMPANY ELECTRIC-ARC 588.12 UTILITIES 255.1640.210.000 099918 9858990853-6 P 836 00232 GAS-OBSERVATORY HSE 71.52 UTILITIES 100.6001.210.000 099919 4722717075-1 P 836 00231 659.64 *VENDOR TOTAL PACIFIC ECORISK INC TOXICITY TESTING 525.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099719 7539 P 836 00234 TOXICITY TESTING 525.00 LAB TESTING SERVICES 612.3580.250.001 099720 7515 P 836 00233 1,050.00 *VENDOR TOTAL PEAVEY COMPANY/LYNN TAPE 221.23 PRISIONER EXPENSE 105.2001.500.000 099721 239397 P 836 00235 STATE USE TAX 15.30CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099721 239397 P 836 00236 DIST USE TAX 0.93CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099721 239397 P 836 00237 205.00 *VENDOR TOTAL PERKOWSKI/ROBERT M T-SHIRTS 614.38 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 200.2001.690.000 099920 9327 P 836 00238 PETERSON TRACTOR CO. BATTERIES 97.70 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 099826 6636300 P 836 00239 BATTERIES 168.56 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 099826 6636300 P 836 00240 PARTS ORDER 210.17 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESA 575.5801.431.000 099826 6636300 P 836 00241 476.43 *VENDOR TOTAL PORTER/VIRGINIA APR11 RRWA EXEC DIR 11,315.18 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SERVI 975.4750.250.100 099921 9 P 836 00242 APR11 RRWA EXEC DIR 2,538.43 GENERAL BENEFIT PROJECTS 975.4750.250.200 099921 9 P 836 00243 APR11 RRWA EXEC DIR 4,402.19 SPECIAL BENEFIT PROJECTS 975.4750.250.300 099921 9 P 836 00244 18,255.80 *VENDOR TOTAL PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES MAY11 PPD LEGAL INSUR 185.30 PREPAID LEGAL - AFLAC 940.200.726 099922 38295-MAY11 P 836 00245 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEM FINANCIAL ADVSRY SRVS 27,525.33 RDA CONSULTANTS 965.5603.250.000 099923 118292-188294 P 836 00246 REDWOOD EMPIRE DIVISION MTG REC/DINNER-CHAMBERS 30.00 MEMBERSHIPS & MEETINGS 100.1201.262.000 099924 SFD6926 P 836 00247 MTG REC/DINNER-M RODIN 30.00 SPECIAL EVENTS/PROJECTS 100.1001.690.010 099924 SFD6926 P 836 00248 MTG REC/DINNER-B THOMAS 30.00 SPECIAL EVENTS/PROJECTS 100.1001.690.010 099924 SFD6926 P 836 00249 90.00 *VENDOR TOTAL REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB I TOXICOLOGY SCREENING 196.75 CHEMICAL TESTS FOR DUI'S 105.2001.250.017 099925 169820114 P 836 00250 REESE/JAMES B CLEANING SRVS-4/30/11 315.00 MISC COSTS BILLED TO CLI 410.6190.690.004 099926 30702 P 836 00251 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/20/2011 09:09:59 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION REIDENBACH/THOMAS D EMS SUPPLIES RIDELL/MICHAEL VOID CK #107372 ROCKWELL ENGINEERING & E RIGHT ROTARY LOBE LEFT ROTARY LOBE SHIPPING SANCHEZ/MARGIE DEPOSIT -296 BANKER BLVD LESS JOB COSTS LESS JOB COSTS LESS JOB COSTS LESS LABOR & MATERIALS LESS ADMIN COSTS SCHALLERT/CAROL CATERING -5/11/11 CATERING -5/13/11 CATERING 5/6/11 SCOTT/LORELEI M BANNER DATE CHANGES SEABROOK & ASSOCIATES IN BLDG INSPECTION SRVS SINGLETON/ERIC UNIFORM ALLOWANCE SMATSKY JR/ALBERT MILEAGE 5/13/11 SOURCE CALIFORNIA ENERGY ENG SVCS AT HYDRO STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT APR11 PPD SALES/USE TAX APR11 PPD SALES/USE TAX APR11 PPD SALES/USE TAX Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 119.95 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2101.690.000 246.14CR WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 748.20 TRTMT PROCE EQUIP REPLCM 612.3580.302.003 374.10 TRTMT PROCE EQUIP REPLCM 612.3580.302.003 42.96 TRTMT PROCE EQUIP REPLCM 612.3580.302.003 1,165.26 *VENDOR TOTAL 243.80 REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS TRUS 900.205.200 7.61CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 612.0800.680.050 30.43CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 16.34CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 141.63CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 39.20CR REIMBURSBL JOBS 100.0800.680.050 8.59 *VENDOR TOTAL 00259 280.00 FOOD & BEVERAGE FOR CLIE 410.6190.690.002 500.00 FOOD & BEVERAGE FOR CLIE 410.6190.690.002 375.00 FOOD & BEVERAGE FOR CLIE 410.6190.690.002 1,155.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 48.59 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 600.5001.690.000 1,657.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.2201.250.000 365.18 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE (FD/PD 105.2101.157.000 210.12 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 800.3733.160.000 9,200.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.5536.250.000 899.00 STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 83.00 DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 1,173.00 AVIATION FUELS & LUBRICA 600.5001.451.000 2,155.00 *VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 10 CLAIM INVOICE 099927 562833 099928 REIMBURSEMENT 099929 12140 099929 12140 099929 12140 099930 JBO #11007 099930 JBO #11007 099930 JBO #11007 099930 JBO #11007 099930 JBO #11007 099930 JBO #11007 099931 NONE 5/11/11 099932 NONE 5/17/11 099933 NONE 5/11/11 099934 89 099991 10627 099936 REIMBURSEMENT 099935 REIMBURSEMENT 099722 203080 099937 SRJHE27-028900 099937 SRJHE27-028900 099937 SRJHE27-028900 PO# F/P ID LINE P 836 00252 P 837 00003 040290 F 836 00253 040290 F 836 00254 040290 F 836 00255 P 836 00256 P 836 00257 P 836 00258 P 836 00259 P 836 00260 P 836 00261 P 836 00262 P 836 00264 P 836 00263 P 836 00265 040129 P 836 00266 P 836 00267 P 836 00268 040232 F 836 00269 P 836 00270 P 836 00271 P 836 00272 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/20/2011 09:09:59 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION STEARNS/ANITA CLASSES-KINDERMUSIK TAYMAN PARK GOLF GROUP I APR11 GOLF MGMNT CLASSES -GOLF CLASSES -GOLF THOMPSON/OREN LINENS THORNTON/RICHARD PHONE CHANGES THRIFTY SUPPLY CO. VALVE TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TIRES/TIRE REPAIRS TIRES/TIRE REPAIRS TIRES/TIRE REPAIRS TIRES/TIRE REPAIRS TIRES/TIRE REPAIRS TIRES/TIRE REPAIRS DIST USE TAX TOTAL WASTE SYSTEMS INC APR11 BIOSOLIDS TRACTOR SUPPLY CREDIT PL FUEL FILTER ROUNDUP FUEL FILTER 50 GAL TANK LOCK PINS Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 1,210.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 36,076.49 PRO CONTRACT REIMBURSEME 695.6120.250.001 182.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 500.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 36,758.99 *VENDOR TOTAL 53.29 EQUIP RENTAL FOR CLIENTS 410.6190.690.003 47.50 TELECOM/NETWORK WIRING/C 100.1965.250.002 497.89 TRTMT PROLE EQUIP REPLCM 612.3580.302.003 580.11 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3301.303.000 432.04 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6001.302.000 291.13 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 402.28 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 695.6120.302.000 22.76 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 18.18 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 4.73CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 1,741.77 *VENDOR TOTAL 9,048.66 BIO -SOLIDS DISPOSAL FEES 612.3580.250.008 76.10 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6001.302.000 880.78 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 32.62 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 695.6120.302.000 271.86 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 13.02 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 1,274.38 *VENDOR TOTAL 00279 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-VO7.12 PAGE 11 CLAIM INVOICE 099938 INSTRUCTOR 099939 CONTRACT 099940 INSTRUCTOR 099940 INSTRUCTOR 099724 01-009049-04 099941 5226 099723 2107624-01 099942 ACCT 191658 099942 ACCT 191658 099942 ACCT 191658 099942 ACCT 191658 099942 ACCT 191658 099942 ACCT 191658 099942 ACCT 191658 099943 130461 099944 0285 9664 099944 0285 9664 099944 0285 9664 099944 0285 9664 099944 0285 9664 PO# F/P ID LINE P 836 00273 P 836 00274 P 836 00275 P 836 00276 P 836 00277 P 836 00278 P 836 00279 P 836 00280 P 836 00281 P 836 00282 P 836 00283 P 836 00284 P 836 00285 P 836 00286 P 836 00287 P 836 00288 P 836 00289 P 836 00290 P 836 00291 P 836 00292 U.S. CELLULAR CELL PHONE SRV 29.54 TELEPHONE 612.3580.220.000 099947 956161725 P 836 00293 CELL PHONE SRV 29.54 TELEPHONE 800.3765.220.000 099947 956161725 P 836 00294 CELL PHONE SRV 14.78 TELEPHONE 820.3901.220.000 099947 956161725 P 836 00295 CELL PHONE SRV 14.77 TELEPHONE 612.3505.220.000 099947 956161725 P 836 00296 88.63 *VENDOR TOTAL UKIAH VALLEY ASSOCATION APR11 JANITORIAL SVCS 365.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.3301.250.000 099945 IN09859 039863 P 836 00297 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE 05/20/2011 09:09:59 26575 Schedule of Bills Payable 099946 26575 FOR A/P 00299 VENDOR NAME 26575 P 836 00300 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT UKIAH VALLEY MEDICAL CEN WID2226-COUKIA 039298 P 836 APR11 PHYSICALS 490.45 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 105.2190.690.003 APR11 PHYSICALS 1,858.89 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 105.2101.690.009 APR11 PHYSICALS 1,281.96 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYS. EXA 100.1601.690.001 FLYER 3,631.30 *VENDOR TOTAL 00311 US BANK TRUST NA 712453737 P 836 ELEC BOND PYMNT-INTEREST 392,812.50 BOND INTEREST 550.6903.682.000 ELEC BOND PYMNT-PRINCIPL 1,240,000.00 BOND PRINCIPAL 550.6903.681.000 ELEC BOND PYMNT-CASH TRU 648.22CR CASH & INVEST W/FISCAL A 555.101.004 1,632,164.28 *VENDOR TOTAL USA BLUEBOOK UNIVERSAL SORBENT PADS 127.26 TRAINING MAT & SAFETY SU 612.3580.690.002 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS IN MAY11 PAGER SRV 26.66 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.2080.250.000 VALLEY PAVING PARKING LOT STRIPING 1,230.00 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 VISIT MENDOCINO COUNTY I PROMOTION 600.00 CHAMBER CONTR-TOT MEASUR 100.1945.250.001 WECK LABORATORIES INC WATER SAMPLING 460.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.3908.250.000 WILSON/SUSANA CLASS -TAI CHI 52.06 RECREATION PROGRAM INCOM 100.0700.521.001 WINE COUNTRY WATERWORKS TRAINING REGIST-3 PEOPLE 120.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 612.3510.160.000 TRAINING REGIST-3 PEOPLE 120.00 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 820.3948.160.000 240.00 *VENDOR TOTAL XEROX CORPORATION APR11 COPIER 151.69 LEASE -PURCHASE COSTS 410.6190.255.000 ZACK'S CATERING PG&E CATERING 2,202.19 FOOD & BEVERAGE FOR CLIE 410.6190.690.002 ZGLOBAL INC NERC AND WECC REG COMPL. 10,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.3733.250.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 12 CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE 099946 26575 P 836 00298 099946 26575 P 836 00299 099946 26575 P 836 00300 099478 SA94813127 P 836 00301 099478 SA94813127 P 836 00302 099478 SA94813127 P 836 00303 099725 383172 P 836 00304 099948 U0190493E P 836 00305 099726 11/020 P 836 00306 099949 171 P 836 00307 099727 WID2226-COUKIA 039298 P 836 00308 099950 REFUND P 836 00309 099951 FLYER P 836 00310 099951 FLYER P 836 00311 099729 712453737 P 836 00312 099730 LETTER 040305 IF 836 00313 099952 1312 040245 F 836 00314 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/20/2011 09:09:59 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 13 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE REPORT TOTALS: 4,073,974.53 RECORDS PRINTED - 000317 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEMENTS 100 GENERAL FUND 116,720.78 105 MEASURE S GENERAL FUND 17,277.14 140 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 4,036.29 203 H&S EDUCATION 11489(B)(2)(A1 40,000.00 220 PKG. DIST. #1 OPER & MAINT 437.54 255 ARC GENERAL OPERATING FUND 1,389.40 410 CONFERENCE CENTER FUND 4,518.75 575 GARAGE FUND 2,308.44 600 AIRPORT FUND 1,885.94 612 CITY/DIST. SEWER FUND 31,969.34 614 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 87,829.05 641 SANITATION DISTRICT SPECIAL 16,848.45 660 SANITARY DISPOSAL SITE FUND 406.21 678 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCH FUND 145.48 695 GOLF FUND 8,492.61 696 PURCHASING FUND 50.42 697 BILLING ENTERPRISE FUND 4,051.44 699 SPECIAL PROJECTS RESERVE 841.20 800 ELECTRIC FUND 57,168.91 805 STREET LIGHTING FUND 9,086.50 806 PUBLIC BENEFITS CHARGES 15.33 820 WATER FUND 25,019.20 900 SPECIAL DEPOSIT TRUST FUND 6,520.91 940 PAYROLL POSTING FUND 9,748.14 950 GENERAL SERVICE (ACCTS RECV) 457.02 960 COMMUNITY REDEV. AGENCY FUND 198.39 962 REDEVELOPMENT HOUSING FUND 873.91 965 REDEVELOPMENT CAP IMPR FUND 68,890.60 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 517,187.39 BANK RECAP: BANK NAME DISBURSEMENTS ---- ---------------------------- UBOC UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 517,187.39 TOTAL ALL BANKS 517,187.39 THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. CITY OF UKIAH GL060S-V07.12 RECAPPAGE GL540R ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable s � DATE �"`� l �. APPROVED BY ... ......... 7 .............. . �............................ ............................... CITY OF UKIAH GL060S-V07.12 RECAPPAGE GL540R ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 1 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE AFLAC SEC 125 ADMIN FEES 50.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES(SEC. 940.200.730 099999 716536ER P 853 00001 CANCER/LIFE/ACC INSUR 6,628.10 SECTION 125 (CANCER & LI 940.200.727 100001 951760 P 853 00002 6,678.10 *VENDOR TOTAL AFLAC - FLEX ONE UNREIMBURSED MEDICAL 17.42 MEDICAL & DEPENDANT REIM 940.200.728 100000 FAX P 853 00003 UNREIMBURSED MEDICAL 375.00 MEDICAL & DEPENDANT REIM 940.200.728 100002 FAX P 853 00004 392.42 *VENDOR TOTAL AIRGAS NCN RAINGEAR JACKETS 2,296.80 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3646.690.000 100003 102028572 040283 F 853 00005 WALL MOUNTS 63.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 820.3948.690.004 100004 102088729 P 853 00006 WALL MOUNTS 63.07 SAFETY SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.001 100004 102088729 P 853 00007 2,422.95 *VENDOR TOTAL ALPINE AWARDS T-SHIRTS 20.57 SUPPLIES 100.6112.690.000 100005 256067 P 853 00009 T-SHIRTS 22.10 SUPPLIES 100.6112.690.000 100006 256031 P 853 00008 42.67 *VENDOR TOTAL AT&T LIVE SCAN 1,018.08 TELEPHONE 105.2001.220.000 100007 601003435 P 853 00011 SPAM FILTERING 491.55 ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AGRE 100.1965.250.001 100008 2112805104 P 853 00010 1,509.63 *VENDOR TOTAL AT&T MOBILITY VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 20.88 UTILITIES 612.3510.210.000 100009 875108535 P 853 00021 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 13.92 TELEPHONE 820.3908.220.000 100009 875108535 P 853 00022 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 2.77 TELEPHONE 800.3765.220.000 100009 875108535 P 853 00023 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 58.31 TELEPHONE 100.1965.220.000 100009 875108535 P 853 00024 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 7.16 TELEPHONE 820.3908.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00013 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 32.34 TELEPHONE 800.3733.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00014 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 7.15 TELEPHONE 820.3901.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00015 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 14.11 TELEPHONE 612.3505.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00016 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 15.57 TELEPHONE 600.5001.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00017 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 6.96 TELEPHONE 678.2040.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00018 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 48.60 TELEPHONE 100.6130.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00019 VOICE & DATE CELL PHONES 7.49 TELEPHONE 100.1965.220.000 100010 832118877 P 853 00020 APN MODEMS -POLICE 547.48 TELEPHONE 105.2001.220.000 100011 832056361 P 853 00012 782.74 *VENDOR TOTAL AUTO ENGINUITY SUBSCRIPTION UPDATE 100.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 575.5801.302.000 100012 6073 P 853 00025 B.J.'S EMBROIDERY T-SHIRTS & EMBROIDERY 124.68 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 820.3960.690.000 099956 11152 P 853 00026 T-SHIRTS & EMBROIDERY 157.36 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 820.3960.690.000 099957 11153 P 853 00027 282.04 *VENDOR TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION BAKER/ANN FITZPATRICK CONSULT SRVS/RIVERSIDE BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS BLUE RETURN ENVELOPES BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP LEGAL SRVS-RDA LEGAL SRVS-RDA LEGAL SRVS-RDA LEGAL SRVS-RDA BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 3 NEW MEMBERSHIPS BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF U DRUG & ALCOHOL EDUCTION BREWER III/SPENCER J. CONCERT MGMNT-6/5/11 CARMICHAEL/STEVEN MEALS -SOFTWARE DEMOS OREGON SOFTWARE DEMO CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 2010 URBAN WATER MGMT PL CHASE CARD SERVICES SUPPLIES BANKING SERVICES POSTAGE COPIES CLARK PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL SRVS COMCAST INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 3,317.43 RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.930.006 2,623.46 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 697.1305.690.000 92.04 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 962.5602.250.000 184.08 RDA CONSULTANTS 965.5603.250.000 613.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 962.5602.250.000 153.40 RDA CONSULTANTS 965.5603.250.000 1,043.12 *VENDOR TOTAL 20.40 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2090.690.000 10,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 203.2001.250.000 500.00 CONCERT SERIES 900.205.226 31.73 TRAVEL, TRAINING, CONFER 100.1301.160.000 1,138.94 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EXPE 697.1305.160.000 1,170.67 *VENDOR TOTAL 6,530.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.3901.250.000 93.50 SUPPLIES AND OFFICE EXPE 641.7402.690.001 9.99 CONSULTANT SERVICES 641.7402.250.001 89.78 POSTAGE/SHIPPING 641.7402.411.001 1,257.69 REPRODUCTION EXPENSE 641.7402.231.001 1,450.96 *VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 612.3580.250.009 1.15 TELEPHONE 100.1101.220.000 3.80 TELEPHONE 100.1201.220.000 4.28 TELEPHONE 100.1301.220.000 3.80 TELEPHONE 100.1501.220.000 1.89 TELEPHONE 100.1601.220.000 2.85 TELEPHONE 100.1905.220.000 3.80 TELEPHONE 100.1965.220.000 23.78 TELEPHONE 105.2001.220.000 10.46 TELEPHONE 105.2101.220.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 2 CLAIM INVOICE 100013 3.2011 099828 086914 099958 652076 099959 652079 099960 652078 099961 652077 100015 APPLICATIONS 100014 LETTER 099962 CONTRACT 100016 REIMBURSEMENT 100017 REIMBURSEMENT 099963 116153 100019 7462-7594 100019 7462-7594 100019 7462-7594 100019 7462-7594 100018 11-162897452 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 100020 0144635 PO# F/P ID LINE 040038 P 853 00028 040266 F 853 00029 P 853 00030 P 853 00033 P 853 00032 P 853 00031 P 853 00034 P 853 00035 040069 P 853 00036 P 853 00037 P 853 00038 040252 P 853 00039 P 853 00040 P 853 00041 P 853 00042 P 853 00043 P 853 00044 P 853 00045 P 853 00046 P 853 00047 P 853 00048 P 853 00049 P 853 00050 P 853 00051 P 853 00052 P 853 00053 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bil1S Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 3 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION COMCAST INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE INTERNET SERVICE COOPER POWER SYSTEMS VFI-11 SWITCHGEAR CURTIS & SONS/L. N. FLOW TEST KIT EEL RIVER FUELS BARREL DEPOSIT RETURN LUBRICANTS LUBRICANTS DIST USE TAX ENV ENVIRONMENTAL INT'L APR11 BIN RENTAL FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP EXPRESS MAIL EXPRESS MAIL EXPRESS MAIL GALLO/GARY R. VOID CK #107024 GAUDETTE/KEITH CONCERT SOUND 6/5/11 AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE 0.94 TELEPHONE 100.2201.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00054 3.80 TELEPHONE 100.3001.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00055 0.94 TELEPHONE 100.3110.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00056 0.47 TELEPHONE 100.6001.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00057 2.85 TELEPHONE 100.6110.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00058 2.85 TELEPHONE 100.6150.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00059 0.94 TELEPHONE 220.4601.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00060 1.89 TELEPHONE 410.6190.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00061 1.89 TELEPHONE 600.5001.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00062 0.94 TELEPHONE 612.3580.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00063 0.94 TELEPHONE 660.3401.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00064 2.85 TELEPHONE 678.2040.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00065 0.47 TELEPHONE 695.6120.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00066 0.94 TELEPHONE 696.1390.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00067 9.04 TELEPHONE 697.1305.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00068 6.66 TELEPHONE 800.3733.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00069 2.85 TELEPHONE 820.3901.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00070 1.89 TELEPHONE 820.3908.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00071 0.94 TELEPHONE 960.5601.220.000 100020 0144635 P 853 00072 99.90 *VENDOR TOTAL 24,533.61 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3729.930.000 100021 910487049 040162 P 853 00073 994.95 FIRE APPARATUS 105.2101.303.001 099731 1210344-00 P 853 00074 10.00CR BLDG & GROUNDS MAINTENAN 600.5001.305.000 100022 101679 P 853 00078 804.19 FUEL PURCHASES 575.5801.450.000 100023 101432 P 853 00075 64.65 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 100024 101492 P 853 00076 0.30CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 100024 101492 P 853 00077 858.54 *VENDOR TOTAL 300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.3733.250.000 100025 11770 P 853 00079 20.95 POSTAGE 100.1601.411.000 100026 1026-9259-4 P 853 00080 13.07 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3580.690.000 100026 1026-9259-4 P 853 00081 31.55 POSTAGE COSTS 800.3733.411.000 100026 1026-9259-4 P 853 00082 65.57 *VENDOR TOTAL 61.70CR BLDG & GROUNDS MAINTENAN 600.5001.305.000 100027 2565 P 854 00001 1,470.00 CONCERT SERIES 900.205.226 100028 CONTRACT 040334 P 853 00083 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GAUDETTE/KEITH CONCERT LABOR -6/5/11 GENERAL PACIFIC INC. METERS GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COM ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT ROCK/SAND/ASPHALT GREBIL/LYNNE POOL CONCESSION ITEMS POOL CONCESSION ITEMS GRECO/LINA CLASSES-PILATES HD SUPPLY UTILITIES LTD FAULT WIZARD BRZ CONN BRZ CONN 4/0 CU COND 2/0 CU COND 6 SOL CU COND HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE P CREDIT BAL-C WILSON IBEW, LOCAL 1245 MAY11 UNION DUES INTEGRITY SHRED SHRED DOCUMENTS Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 192.00 CONCERT SERIES 900.205.226 1,662.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 696.00 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3650.690.000 948.90 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 302.75 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 1,571.47 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 134.58 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 960.47 GROUND MAINTENANCE 695.6120.305.000 553.95 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 553.94 WTR SYSTM REPAIR MATERIA 820.3948.690.002 5,026.06 *VENDOR TOTAL 141.00 CONCESSIONS 100.6130.690.002 292.43 CONCESSIONS 100.6130.690.002 433.43 *VENDOR TOTAL 1,227.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6120.250.000 9,226.35 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3729.690.000 217.50 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 464.36 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 2,283.75 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 1,446.38 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 616.61 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 14,254.95 *VENDOR TOTAL 249.46 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 26.03 R & M NON -AUTO FIRE EQUI 105.2101.302.001 21.66 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 119.60 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 416.75 *VENDOR TOTAL 30.71 UTILITY CREDIT BAL CLEAR 950.115.101 1,271.62 P/R DEDUCT. -UNION DUES 940.200.709 525.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1101.250.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 4 CLAIM INVOICE 100029 COL1100332 100030 1126181 099965 130972 099966 139073 099967 131015 099968 130974 099969 131093 099970 131174 099970 131174 100031 REIMBURSEMENT 100032 REIMBURSEMENT 100033 INSTRUCTOR 099829 1706537-00 099830 1724498-01 099830 1724498-01 099831 1723006-00 099831 1723006-00 099832 1724498-00 100034 0266 3150 100034 0266 3150 100034 0266 3150 100034 0266 3150 100035 78253-2 100036 NONE 099971 23315 PO# F/P ID LINE P 853 00084 P 853 00085 P 853 00086 P 853 00092 P 853 00088 P 853 00087 P 853 00089 P 853 00090 P 853 00091 P 853 00093 P 853 00094 P 853 00095 040269 F 853 00096 040303 F 853 00100 040303 F 853 00101 040299 F 853 00097 040299 F 853 00098 040303 F 853 00099 P 853 00102 P 853 00103 P 853 00104 P 853 00105 P 853 00106 P 853 00107 P 853 00110 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INTEGRITY SHRED SHRED DOCUMENTS SHRED DOCUMENTS J -M LOCKSMITH LOCKS/KEYS LOCKS/KEYS JONES/R. EMMETT MGMT ADVISORY SVCS KENNEDY/RICK POSTAGE LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGM APR11 SEARCH SERVICES MATHESON TRI -GAS INC NITROGEN CABLE/LUGS MCGRAW/MARGARET UTILITY REFUND MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO WRENCH, FOAM MENDOCINO COLLEGE DRUG & ALCOHOL EDUCATION MENDOCINO COUNTY ANIMAL ANNUAL SHELTER SVCS MENDOCINO COUNTY COOPERA ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION MENDOCINO COUNTY EMS APR11 AMBUL TRANSPORTS MENDOCINO GLOVE COMPANY GLOVES MOYNAHAN/ALACIA UTILITY REFUND Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 28.50 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 678.2040.690.000 28.50 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.000 582.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 00109 12.72 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 58.78 SUPPLIES 255.1640.690.000 71.50 *VENDOR TOTAL 099974 2,100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1201.250.000 1,061.02 POSTAGE/SHIPPING 641.7402.411.001 80.00 MAJOR CRIMES INVESTIGATI 105.2001.500.002 26.96 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3642.690.000 147.71 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 820.3908.302.000 174.67 *VENDOR TOTAL 853 15.45 UTILITY CREDIT BAL CLEAR 950.115.101 130.67 SMALL TOOLS 612.3580.440.000 10,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 203.2001.250.000 65,468.00 COUNTY SHELTER OPT COSTS 100.6005.250.003 500.00 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 105.2190.690.002 427.50 AMBULANCE PERMIT FEES 105.2101.347.000 241.43 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3646.690.000 24.49 UTILITY CREDIT BAL CLEAR 950.115.101 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 5 CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE 099972 23253 P 853 00108 099972 23253 P 853 00109 100037 STATEMENT P 853 00111 100037 STATEMENT P 853 00112 100038 STATEMENT 039925 P 853 00113 100039 REIMBURSEMENT P 853 00114 099833 1410964-201104 P 853 00115 099973 2425413 P 853 00116 099974 2447618 P 853 00117 099994 78750-7 P 853 00118 100040 83319664 P 853 00119 100041 LETTER P 853 00120 100043 SHELTER 10-11 040324 F 853 00121 100044 RENEWAL P 853 00122 100042 NONE P 853 00123 099834 31026 P 853 00124 099995 101995-9 P 853 00125 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT MUNNELL & SHERRILL INC BROOMS, HANDLES 145.64 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 MYERS/RON D CONSULT SRVS W/CHIEF 1,850.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.2101.250.000 NAPA AUTO PARTS-UKIAH VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 24.54 SMALL TOOLS 100.1915.440.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 20.65 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.3110.303.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 13.04 SMALL TOOLS 100.3110.440.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 15.92 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6001.302.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 45.00 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 100.6001.303.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 35.43 SMALL TOOLS 100.6001.440.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 11.95 GARAGE VEHICLE MAINT COS 105.2001.303.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 330.23 EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR RESA 575.5801.431.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 16.92 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 612.3510.690.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 84.96 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 612.3580.302.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 51.71 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 612.3580.303.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 4.14 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 612.3580.303.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 1.92 SMALL TOOLS 612.3580.440.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 68.35 LUBRICANTS 612.3580.450.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 358.69 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 695.6120.303.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 163.14 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 695.6120.303.000 VEHICLE PARTS/SUPPL 9.74 WTR TREATMT PARTS/MATERI 820.3908.302.001 1,256.33 *VENDOR TOTAL NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EMER CONTINUING ED/J DUSKIN 10.00 TRAVEL, TRAINING & CONF 678.2040.160.000 NELSON/RYAN UNIFORM & PPE 561.67 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 105.2190.690.002 NORTH STATE STREET INVES JUN11 OFFICE RENT 612.00 OFFICE LEASE 641.7402.330.001 NOTEPAGE INC SUPPORT RENEWAL 197.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.2101.250.000 SUPPORT RENEWAL 197.50 RADIO SERVICE 105.2001.250.001 395.00 *VENDOR TOTAL NOUVIR LIGHING CORP REBUILT DRAWER 107.67 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6150.690.000 STATE USE TAX 8.17CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 DIST USE TAX 0.50CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 99.00 *VENDOR TOTAL OCE IMAGISTICS INC MAY11 COPIER LEASE 508.28 COPIER 100.1905.255.001 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.1.2 PAGE 6 CLAIM INVOICE 099975 769217 100045 NONE 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100046 21310124 100047 NONE 100048 REIMBURSEMENT 100050 LEASE 100049 I6222 100049 I6222 100051 26176 100051 26176 100051 26176 099976 979230 PO# F/P ID LINE P 853 00126 040330 F 853 00127 P 853 00128 P 853 00129 P 853 00130 P 853 00131 P 853 00132 P 853 00133 P 853 00134 P 853 00135 P 853 00136 P 853 00137 P 853 00138 P 853 00139 P 853 00140 P 853 00141 P 853 00142 P 853 00143 P 853 00144 P 853 00145 P 853 00146 P 853 00147 P 853 00148 P 853 00149 P 853 00150 P 853 00151 P 853 00152 P 853 00153 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 7 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE ONE SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS ROPE 371.93 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3728.690.000 099835 53515225.001 P 853 00154 BOLT EYES 307.76 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3728.690.000 099836 53518088.001 P 853 00156 BRACE CROSSARM 861.30 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 099837 53515407.001 P 853 00155 HOT TAP CLAMPS 322.99 INVENTORY - PURCHASES 800.131.002 099977 53526090.001 P 853 00157 1,863.98 *VENDOR TOTAL OPERATING ENGINEERS UNIO MAY11 UNION DUES 1,406.00 P/R DEDUCT. -UNION DUES 940.200.709 100052 1105-1 P 853 00158 OSWELL/MARK DEPOSIT -525 DOOLAN CAN 1,633.88 REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS TRUS 900.205.200 100053 JOB# 11009 P 853 00159 LESS JOB COSTS 231.74CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 612.0800.680.050 100053 JOB# 11009 P 853 00160 LESS JOB COSTS 130.36CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 100053 JOB# 11009 P 853 00161 LESS JOB COSTS 337.58CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 612.0800.680.050 100053 JOB# 11009 P 853 00162 LESS JOB COSTS 137.38CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 612.0800.680.050 100053 JOB# 11009 P 853 00163 LESS JOB COSTS 289.89CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 100053 JOB# 11009 P 853 00164 LESS ADMIN COSTS 225.39CR REIMBURSBL JOBS 100.0800.680.050 100053 JOB# 11009 P 853 00165 281.54 *VENDOR TOTAL P. G. & E. COMPANY UTILITIES 37.67 UTILITIES 600.5001.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00166 UTILITIES 8.38 UTILITIES 100.6130.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00167 UTILITIES 227.67 UTILITIES 410.6190.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00168 UTILITIES 49.02 UTILITIES 612.3510.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00169 UTILITIES 791.99 NAT GAS & PROPANE 612.3580.214.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00170 UTILITIES 405.27 UTILITIES 660.3401.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00171 UTILITIES 96.79 UTILITIES 695.6120.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00172 UTILITIES 134.90 UTILITIES 820.3908.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00173 UTILITIES 40.71 UTILITIES 100.6150.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00174 UTILITIES 1,075.05 UTILITIES 100.1915.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00175 UTILITIES 271.30 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 100.3110.450.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00176 UTILITIES 152.03 UTILITIES 960.5601.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00177 UTILITIES 35.22 UTILITIES 100.6001.210.000 100055 689263822-9 P 853 00178 3,326.00 *VENDOR TOTAL PAC -VAN INC MOBILE OFFICE LEASE 135.29 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.3110.250.000 100054 PSI -1254404 P 853 00179 MOBILE OFFICE LEASE 67.64 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.3901.250.000 100054 PSI -1254404 P 853 00180 MOBILE OFFICE LEASE 67.64 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 612.3505.250.000 100054 PSI -1254404 P 853 00181 270.57 *VENDOR TOTAL PENNINGTON/MINDY UTILITY REFUND 34.19 UTILITY CREDIT BAL CLEAR 950.115.101 099996 103387-7 P 853 00182 PENNY'S TROPHIES SIGNS 78.30 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.000 099964 394945 P 853 00183 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 8 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC MAR11 INVESTMENT SRVS 6,840.97 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1910.250.000 099978 PFM -118142 P 853 00184 APR11 INVESTMENT SRVS 6,630.14 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1910.250.000 100057 PFM -118904 P 853 00185 13,471.11 *VENDOR TOTAL PHILBRICK/CHRIS DEPOSIT -1221 W STANDLEY 1,722.73 REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS TRUS 900.205.200 100056 JOB# 11006 P 853 00186 LESS JOB COSTS 275.26CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 612.0800.680.050 100056 JOB# 11006 P 853 00187 LESS JOB COSTS 154.83CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 100056 JOB# 11006 P 853 00188 LESS JOB COSTS 232.49CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 100056 JOB# 11006 P 853 00189 LESS JOB COSTS 588.95CR REIMBURSABLE JOBS 820.0800.680.050 100056 JOB# 11006 P 853 00190 LESS ADMIN COSTS 250.31CR REIMBURSBL JOBS 100.0800.680.050 100056 JOB# 11006 P 853 00191 220.89 *VENDOR TOTAL POSITRON INC AC DATA STANDALONE UNIT 1,790.03 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099979 516091 040300 F 853 00192 FREIGHT 78.24 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 099979 516091 040300 F 853 00193 STATE USE TAX 135.80CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099979 516091 P 853 00194 DIST USE TAX 8.23CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099979 516091 P 853 00195 1,724.24 *VENDOR TOTAL PROPET DISTRIBUTORS INC DISPENSER & BAGS 735.73 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099980 79815 P 853 00196 STATE USE TAX 50.33CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 099980 79815 P 853 00197 DIST USE TAX 3.05CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 099980 79815 P 853 00198 682.35 *VENDOR TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE DEPT. UTILITIES 4,797.73 UTILITIES 100.1915.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00199 UTILITIES 605.35 UTILITIES 100.3110.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00200 UTILITIES 513.37 UTILITIES 100.3150.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00201 UTILITIES 116.79 UTILITIES 100.3301.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00202 UTILITIES 5,230.40 UTILITIES 100.6001.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00203 UTILITIES 209.36 UTILITIES 100.6110.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00204 UTILITIES 1,176.12 UTILITIES 100.6130.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00205 UTILITIES 1,276.54 UTILITIES 100.6150.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00206 UTILITIES 380.00 UTILITIES 220.4601.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00207 UTILITIES 1,552.81 UTILITIES 410.6190.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00208 UTILITIES 1,074.02 UTILITIES 575.5801.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00209 UTILITIES 1,704.17 UTILITIES 600.5001.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00210 UTILITIES 59.19 UTILITIES 612.3510.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00211 UTILITIES 29,063.82 UTILITIES 612.3580.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00212 UTILITIES 40.57 UTILITIES 678.2040.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00213 UTILITIES 4,279.66 UTILITIES 695.6120.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00214 UTILITIES 931.59 UTILITIES 800.3733.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00215 UTILITIES 61.30 UTILITIES 800.3765.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00216 UTILITIES 9,086.50 UTILITIES 805.4001.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00217 UTILITIES 15.33 MONTHLY DISCOUNT PROGRAM 806.3765.250.003 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00218 UTILITIES 500.92 UTILITIES 820.3901.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00219 UTILITIES 14,722.15 UTILITIES 820.3908.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00220 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 9 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE PUBLIC SERVICE DEPT. UTILITIES 45.42 UTILITIES 960.5601.210.000 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00221 UTILITIES 168.27 HOUSING DEVELOP UTILITIE 962.5602.210.001 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00222 UTILITIES 10.40 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONT 965.5616.250.002 099981 VARIOUS P 853 00223 77,621.78 *VENDOR TOTAL RAIN FOREST FANTASY FLOWERS/WILLIS 78.30 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.000 100058 UKI038 P 853 00224 RECREONICS CORPORATION ANCHOR, HOUSING 584.64 SWIMMING POOL CONSTRUCTI 140.6050.930.008 100060 560124 P 853 00225 STATE USE TAX 38.96CR STATE USE TAX LIABILITY 900.205.013 100060 560124 P 853 00226 DIST USE TAX 2.36CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 100060 560124 P 853 00227 543.32 *VENDOR TOTAL REDWOOD COAST FUELS APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 5,141.20 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 105.2001.450.000 100061 9003 P 853 00233 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 1,551.23 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 105.2101.450.000 100062 9004 P 853 00234 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 2,522.91 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 800.3765.450.000 100063 9005 P 853 00235 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 2,364.76 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 100.3110.450.000 100064 9006 P 853 00236 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 49.48 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 696.1390.450.000 100065 9009 P 853 00237 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 354.66 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 100.1915.450.000 100066 9010 P 853 00238 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 509.34 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 105.2080.450.000 100067 9011 P 853 00239 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 41.66 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 100.3001.450.000 100068 9013 P 853 00240 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 1,445.59 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 820.3948.450.000 100069 9014 P 853 00241 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 86.04 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 105.2001.450.000 100070 9016 P 853 00242 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 43.22 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 600.5001.450.000 100071 9017 P 853 00243 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 1,551.78 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 100.6001.450.000 100072 9019 P 853 00244 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 1,688.64 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 695.6120.450.000 100073 9021 P 853 00245 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 113.13 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 612.3510.450.000 100074 9052 P 853 00246 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 228.60 LUBRICANTS 612.3580.450.000 100075 10590 P 853 00228 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 755.13 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 820.3908.450.000 100076 10652 P 853 00229 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 207.47 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 105.2001.450.000 100077 10897 P 853 00230 APR11 CARDLOCK FUEL 61.39 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 820.3960.450.000 100078 10956 P 853 00231 LUBRICANTS 163.67 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 820.3908.450.000 100079 1562147 P 853 00232 18,879.90 *VENDOR TOTAL REDWOOD EMPIRE OFFICIALS UMPIRES/SCOREKEEPERS 374.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6116.250.000 100059 567 P 853 00247 UMPIRES/SCOREKEEPERS 2,453.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.6115.250.000 100059 567 P 853 00248 2,827.75 *VENDOR TOTAL REDWOOD EMPIRE TITLE COM DEPOSIT -3495 TAYLOR DR 500.00 STUDY OF RECYCLING 614.3510.811.001 100080 01302533-OOlDN P 853 00249 DEPOSIT -3495 TAYLOR DR 500.00 STUDY OF RECYCLING 614.3510.810.001 100081 01302533-001DN P 853 00250 1,000.00 *VENDOR TOTAL RINO PACIFIC, INC. CARDLOCK FUEL 5/1-5/15 521.47 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 612.3510.450.000 100082 C125930 P 853 00251 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION RINO PACIFIC, INC. CARDLOCK FUEL 5/1-5/15 SAN DIEGO CO LAW ENFORCE ACADEMY REGIST-5 PEOPLE SANCHEZ/MARGIE K UTILITY REFUND SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING SOFTWARE UPDATE SOFTWARE UPDATE SOFTWARE UPDATE SOFTWARE UPDATE SOFTWARE UPDATE SOFTWARE UPDATE SOFTWARE UPDATE SOFTWARE UPDATE STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES STATE WATER RESOURCES OVERSITE COSTS/LESLIE ST OVERSITE COSTS -UP RR SUBURBAN PROPANE TANK RENTAL T & B SPORTS COLD PACKS TGIF REPAIRS INC PRINTER REPAIRS TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIO QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 619.40 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 820.3948.450.000 1,140.87 *VENDOR TOTAL 2,050.00 TRAVEL & TRAINING CADETS 105.2090.160.002 221.82 UTILITY CREDIT BAL CLEAR 950.115.101 325.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 1,175.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 135.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 1,400.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 350.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 350.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 400.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 400.00 INFRASTRUCTURE 800.3642.930.000 4,535.00 *VENDOR TOTAL 102.20 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3001.690.000 108.71 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 49.99 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 296.37 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6110.690.000 64.46 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6150.690.000 155.12 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 600.5001.690.000 776.85 *VENDOR TOTAL 841.20 LESLIE STREET GAS PLNT M 699.1201.800.032 1,249.72 PERKINS ST RR PROPERTY 965.5618.930.003 2,090.92 *VENDOR TOTAL 60.00 FUELS & LUBRICANTS 820.3908.450.000 88.08 SUPPLIES 100.6111.690.000 280.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 697.1305.302.000 1,564.90 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1915.250.000 1,656.11 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1915.250.000 262.72 CAPITAL LEASE PAYMENT 105.2001.255.000 167.18 COPIER 105.2101.255.005 23.88 LEASE -PURCHASE COSTS 678.2040.255.000 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 10 CLAIM INVOICE 100083 C126137 100084 RESERVE FORM 099997 103289-5 100085 23586-386984 100085 23586-386984 100085 23586-386984 100085 23586-386984 100085 23586-386984 100085 23586-386984 100085 23586-386984 100085 23586-386984 100086 1371137 100086 1371137 100086 1371137 100086 1371137 100086 1371137 100086 1371137 099982 70443 099983 70481 100087 75563 099838 21007 100088 2637 100089 55655061 100089 55655061 100089 55655061 100089 55655061 100089 55655061 PO# F/P ID LINE P 853 00252 P 853 00253 P 853 00254 040272 F 853 00255 040272 F 853 00256 040272 F 853 00257 040272 F 853 00258 040272 F 853 00259 040272 F 853 00260 040272 F 853 00261 040272 F 853 00262 P 853 00263 P 853 00264 P 853 00265 P 853 00266 P 853 00267 P 853 00268 P 853 00269 040227 P 853 00270 P 853 00271 P 853 00272 P 853 00273 P 853 00274 P 853 00275 P 853 00276 P 853 00277 P 853 00278 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 11 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIO QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 23.88 LEASE PURCHASE COSTS 220.4601.255.000 100089 55655061 P 853 00279 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 92.94 CAPITAL LEASE PAYMENT 105.2001.255.000 100089 55655061 P 853 00280 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 59.14 COPIER 105.2101.255.005 100089 55655061 P 853 00281 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 8.45 LEASE -PURCHASE COSTS 678.2040.255.000 100089 55655061 P 853 00282 QTRLY MAINT 1/15-4/15/11 8.45 LEASE PURCHASE COSTS 220.4601.255.000 100089 55655061 P 853 00283 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 297.58 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1915.250.000 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00284 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 297.58 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1915.250.000 100090 55655061 039896 :P 853 00285 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 163.67 CAPITAL LEASE PAYMENT 105.2001.255.000 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00286 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 104.15 COPIER 105.2101.255.005 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00287 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 14.88 LEASE -PURCHASE COSTS 678.2040.255.000 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00288 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 14.88 LEASE PURCHASE COSTS 220.4601.255.000 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00289 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 103.28 CAPITAL LEASE PAYMENT 105.2001.255.000 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00290 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 65.72 COPIER 105.2101.255.005 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00291 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 9.39 LEASE -PURCHASE COSTS 678.2040.255.000 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00292 MAY11 COPIER LEASE 9.39 LEASE PURCHASE COSTS 220.4601.255.000 100090 55655061 039896 P 853 00293 4,948.17 *VENDOR TOTAL U S POST OFFICE POSTAGE-REC GUIDE 2,586.83 COST OF BROCHURES 100.6120.690.001 100092 PERMIT #243 P 853 00294 UKIAH DAILY JOURNAL LEGAL NOTICING 761.79 LEGAL ADVERTISING 100.1101.232.000 100093 ACCT 2117148 039951 P 853 00295 CLASSIFIED ADS 445.14 ADVERTISING 100.1601.690.002 100093 ACCT 2117148 P 853 00296 1,206.93 *VENDOR TOTAL UKIAH HIGH SCHOOL DRUG&ALCOHOL ED -PLANNERS 9,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 203.2001.250.000 100094 LETTER P 853 00297 DRUG&ALCOHOL ED -ATHLETIC 11,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 203.2001.250.000 100094 LETTER P 853 00298 20,000.00 *VENDOR TOTAL UKIAH PAPER SUPPLY JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 368.52 SUPPLIES 255.1640.690.000 100095 I377097 P 853 00299 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 180.73 SUPPLIES 255.1640.690.000 100096 I377098 P 853 00300 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 131.53 SUPPLIES 255.1640.690.000 100097 I377104 P 853 00301 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140.80 BLDG MAINT. 255.1640.301.000 100098 I377218 P 853 00302 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 232.94 BLDG MAINT. 255.1640.301.000 100099 I377219 P 853 00303 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 14.01 SUPPLIES 255.1640.690.000 100100 I377598 P 853 00304 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 262.09 BLDG MAINT. 255.1640.301.000 100101 377514 P 853 00308 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108.73 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6130.690.000 100102 377648 P 853 00309 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 236.38 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 410.6190.690.000 100103 I377947 P 853 00305 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 52.09 STATION CLEANING SUPPLIE 105.2101.690.005 100104 I378084 P 853 00306 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 175.45 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 820.3908.690.000 100105 I378329 P 853 00307 1,903.27 *VENDOR TOTAL UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT PAYROLL 13,724.47 SALARIES, REGULAR 641.7402.110.000 100106 P/P #36 P 853 00310 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 12 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE UNITED STATES POSTAL SER PREPAY POSTAGE 2,500.00 POSTAGE 410.6190.411.000 100091 ACCT 4528829 P 853 00311 VALADOR/LYLE T-3 LICENSE RENEWAL 90.00 TAXES AND FEES 820.3908.630.000 100107 REIMBURSEMENT P 853 00312 WALMART COMMUNITY SUPPLIES 98.80 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.3110.690.000 100108 0091 0258 P 853 00313 OIL 44.23 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6001.302.000 100108 0091 0258 P 853 00314 BEVERAGES 67.73 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 100108 0091 0258 P 853 00315 EVIDENCE SUPPLIES 8.57 PRISIONER EXPENSE 105.2001.500.000 100108 0091 0258 P 853 00316 MAT/MISC SUPPLIES 30.80 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3728.690.000 100108 0091 0258 P 853 00317 SOAP 11.59 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 800.3733.690.000 100108 0091 0258 P 853 00318 261.72 *VENDOR TOTAL WESTON SOLUTIONS INC REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN 23,565.00 PERKINS ST RR PROPERTY 965.5618.930.003 099984 MAY2011-01524 040226 P 853 00320 FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS 2,585.00 PERKINS ST RR PROPERTY 965.5618.930.003 099985 MAY2011-01067 040181 P 853 00319 SUPLMTL SITE SURVEY 11,697.30 PERKINS ST RR PROPERTY 965.5618.930.003 100109 MAY2011-02016 040230 P 853 00321 SUPLMTL SITE SURVEY 14,379.82 PERKINS ST RR PROPERTY 965.5618.930.003 100110 MAY2011-02082 040230 P 853 00322 52,227.12 *VENDOR TOTAL WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTI SSMP PREPARATION 931.75 SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 612.3505.250.002 099988 58191 039468 P 853 00324 RWD BUS PARK IMPROV 8,716.38 REDWD BSNSS PRK IMP DES/ 965.5617.930.002 099989 58258 039614 P 853 00325 PREP OF LOMR-DOOLIN CK 6,349.50 MISC PRJECT AREA INFRAST 965.5616.930.001 100111 58110 040052 P 853 00323 15,997.63 *VENDOR TOTAL WIPF/ERNEST M. PHASE 2B-INLOW/INFILTRN 30,466.33 LINE REPLACEMENTS 614.3510.811.002 100112 29952 P 853 00326 PHASE 2B-INLOW/INFILTRN 30,466.33 MAIN REPLACEMENTS 614.3510.811.003 100112 29952 P 853 00327 PHASE 2B-INLOW/INFILTRN 30,466.34 INFLOW/INFILTRATION 614.3510.811.004 100112 29952 P 853 00328 LESS 5% RETENTION 4,569.95CR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE-RETENTI 614.202.001 100112 29952 P 853 00329 86,829.05 *VENDOR TOTAL WOODS/MITCH CONCERT PERFM-6/5/11 1,250.00 CONCERT SERIES 900.205.226 099990 CONTRACT P 853 00330 WYATT IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 26.97 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099732 244341 P 853 00331 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 18.99 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099733 244343 P 853 00332 PLUGS 5.15 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099734 244344 P 853 00333 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 17.67 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 099735 244423 P 853 00334 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 92.02 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 099839 244568 P 853 00337 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 367.78 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 099840 244695 P 853 00338 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 230.77 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 695.6120.690.000 099841 244560 P 853 00336 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 11.67 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099842 244786 P 853 00340 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 146.48 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 099843 244775 P 853 00339 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/26/2011 16:56:41 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION WYATT IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION SUPPLIES WARRANTY REFUND CHECK VALVES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES XEROX CORPORATION APR11 BASE CHRG COPY CHRG TO 4/30/11 Z.A.P. MANUFACTURING NUMBERS ZUCKER/LILIANNE UTILITY REFUND Schedule of Bills Payable FOR A/P AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT 31.06 SKATE PARK DEVEL 140.6050.930.005 477.88CR SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 37.55 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 116.04 SPECIAL SUPPLIES 100.6001.690.000 40.05 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6130.302.000 664.32 *VENDOR TOTAL 136.76 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6150.302.000 52.94 EQUIPMENT MAINT & REPAIR 100.6150.302.000 189.70 *VENDOR TOTAL 32.63 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTEN 800.3765.303.000 130.36 UTILITY CREDIT DAL CLEAR 950.115.101 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 13 CLAIM INVOICE PO4 F/P ID LINE 099844 244503 P 853 00335 100113 245120 P 853 00343 100114 245124 P 853 00344 100115 245060 P 853 00341 100115 245060 P 853 00342 100116 54997432 P 853 00345 100116 54997432 P 853 00346 099845 39079 P 853 00347 099998 102423-1 P 853 00348 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:56:41 Schedule of Bills Payable GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 14 FOR A/P VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE REPORT TOTALS: 517,187.39 RECORDS PRINTED - 000349 CITY OF UKIAH FINANCE DEPT. CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:57:47 Schedule of Bills GL060S-V07.12 RECAPPAGE GL540R FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION 100 GENERAL FUND 105 MEASURE S GENERAL FUND 140 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 612 CITY/DIST. SEWER FUND 820 WATER FUND 900 SPECIAL DEPOSIT TRUST FUND TOTAL ALL FUNDS BANK RECAP: BANK NAME ---- ---------------------------- UBOC UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TOTAL ALL BANKS DISBURSEMENTS 33 33 66 CR DISBURSEMENTS THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS DATE ............ APPROVED BY R PAYMENT. CITY OF UKIAH FINANCE DEPT. CITY OF UKIAH 05/26/2011 16:57:47 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 1 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE ALPHA ANALYTICAL REVERSE TO 250.000 370.00CR CHEMICALS 820.3908.520.000 1041727 850 00001 CORRECT FM 520.000 370.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.3908.250.000 1041727 850 00002 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL BUSINESS CARD REVERSE TO 2090.690.002 338.74CR SPECIAL SUPPLIES 105.2001.690.002 1776939 850 00003 CORRECT FM 2001.690.002 338.74 SUPPLIES -CADETS 105.2090.690.002 1776939 850 00004 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL EEL RIVER FUELS ADD DIST USE TAX 0.33 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIRS 820.3948.303.000 99663 850 00005 ADD DIST USE TAX 0.33 VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT 612.3510.303.000 99663 850 00006 DIST USE TAX 0.66CR DISTRICT USE TAX LIABILI 900.205.237 99663 850 00007 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL JONES/R. EMMETT MOVE TO 100.1301.250.000 825.00CR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1201.250.000 LETTER 850 00010 MOVE FM 100.1201.250.000 825.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1301.250.000 LETTER 850 00011 MOVE TO 100.1301.250.000 787.00CR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1201.250.000 STATEMENT 850 00008 MOVE FM 100.1201.250.000 787.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1301.250.000 STATEMENT 850 00009 MOVE TO 100.1301.250.000 300.00CR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1201.250.000 STATEMENT 850 00012 MOVE FM 100.1201.250.000 300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1301.250.000 STATEMENT 850 00013 MOVE TO 100.1301.250.000 300.00CR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1201.250.000 STATEMENT 850 00014 MOVE FM 100.1201.250.000 300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.1301.250.000 STATEMENT 850 00015 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL MENDOCINO COUNTY AIR QUA REVERSE TO 930.006 359.24CR RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.800.006 10-108 850 00016 CORRECT FM 800.006 359.24 RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.930.006 10-108 850 00017 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL RRM DESIGN GROUP REVERSE TO 930.006 3,123.53CR RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.800.006 710130504 850 00018 CORRECT FM 800.006 3,123.53 RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.930.006 710130504 850 00019 REVERSE TO 930.006 99.17CR RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.800.006 8101310504 850 00020 CORRECT FM 800.006 99.17 RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.930.006 8101310504 850 00021 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL RUSSIAN RIVER FLOOD CNTR REVERSE TO 213.000 37,600.00CR TELEPHONE 820.3901.220.000 2328 850 00022 CORRECT FM 220.000 37,600.00 RSSN RVR FLD CNTRL WTR P 820.3901.213.000 2328 850 00023 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL STATE WATER RESOURCES CT REVERSE TO 930.006 433.00CR RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.800.006 SW -0032173 850 00024 CORRECT FM 800.006 433.00 RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPME 140.6050.930.006 SW -0032173 850 00025 0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF UKIAH FINANCE DEPT. 05/26/2011 16:57:47 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REPORT TOTALS: 0.00 Schedule of Bills ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT RECORDS PRINTED - 000025 CITY OF UKIAH GL540R-V07.12 PAGE 2 CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE ITEM NO.: 7b MEETING DATE: June 15, 2011 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: AWARD PURCHASE OF 9000 FEET OF 15 KV, AL, 1/0 CABLE IN THE AMOUNT OF $24.263.21. (EUD) The City's Electric Department requests to purchase 9000 feet of 15 kV, Underground Aluminum 1/0 Cable to have for future project needs and back-up stock. Requests for Bids were sent to twenty-two (22) companies. A bid tab is shown below for the four companies that responded. The Okonite Company $24,263.21 WESCO $24,547.05 HD Supply, Benicia $27,551.81 One Source Supply $27,698.63 Staff's recommendation is that the purchase be awarded to The Okonite Company for $24,263.21 which includes tax and freight. Their price will be firm through 6/16/2011. The cable is being purchased to stock and will be charged to the inventory account 800.131.002 and then will be expensed to 800.3729.690.000 as it is used. Inventory is maintained to ensure availability of critical equipment and reliability of the electrical system. This new 1/0 cable size (vs larger 4/0) has resulted in a $9000.00 SAVINGS on this purchase with an estimated savings of $100,000.00 over the next few years. Thanks goes to Jim Bauer, Electrical Distribution Engineer, for making system designs that are effective and help maintain lower electric costs to our rate payers. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 10/11 F-1New Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Add'I Appropriation Req. Funds are available for the purchase to restock inventory and will be expensed from the Materials and Inventory Account (800.3729.690.000) at the time of use. AWARD PURCHASE OF 9000 FEET OF 15 KV, AL, 1/0 CABLE IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,263.21 TO THE OKONITE COMPANY, SAN RAMON, CA. (EUD) Alternative Council Option(s): Reject all bids and provide direction to Staff. Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Colin Murphey, Electric Supervisor Prepared by: Mary Williamson, Buyer Coordinated with: Mary Horger, Purchasing Supervisor, Jim Bauer, Electrical Distribution Engineer Attachments: None Approved: (24� �Z�- - J Chambers, City Manager ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: City of- 171k-ja i AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 7c June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: AWARD PURCHASE OF 6 POLE MOUNT AND 3 PAD MOUNT TRANSFORMERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,791.41. (EUD) The City's Electric Department requests to purchase 6 Pole Mount and 3 Pad Mount Transformers to replenish inventory of back-up transformers and for future project needs. A Request for Quotation was sent out for the purchase of these transformers as outlined in Attachment #1, Transformer Bid Summary, Bid Opening 6/1/2011. The requests were sent to fourteen (14) companies. Six companies responded. To compare each bid, the total bid price of each transformer is added to the unit's cost of losses (load loss and no load loss) over a 20 year life, which results in the total life -cycle cost. Each transformer bid is awarded based upon the lowest life -cycle costs (bid amount + cost of losses) resulting in the lowest cost of the life of the unit. Attachment #1 details the bid results for each transformer. Staff's recommendation is that the purchase of the transformers be awarded to General Pacific, Inc. in the amount of $35,791.41 which represents the combined lowest bid of each transformer. The transformers being purchased are to replenish stock and will be charged to the inventory account 800.131.002, and then expensed to 800.3728.690.000 for pole mount and 800.3729.690.000 for pad mount when used. Inventory is maintained to ensure availability of critical equipment and reliability of the electrical system. Fiscal Impact: ❑X Budgeted FY 10/11 171-1Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Funds are available for the purchase to restock inventory and will be expensed from the Materials and Inventory Accounts (800.3728.690.000 & 800.3729.690.000) at the time of use. AWARD PURCHASE OF 6 POLE MOUNT AND 3 PAD MOUNT TRANSFORMERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,791.41 TO GENERAL PACIFIC, INC., FAIRVIEW OR. (EUD) Alternative Council Option(s): Reject all bids and provide direction to Staff. Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Colin Murphey, Electric Supervisor Prepared by: Mary Williamson, Buyer Coordinated with: Mary Horger, Purchasing Supervisor Attachments: Transformer Bid Summary LZ,;11A1A- Approved: Ja Chambers, City Manager TRANSFORMER BID SUMMARY BID OPENING June 1, 2011 ITEM 1 3,.ea. POLE MOUNT,25 1NA,12 KV,240/120 V,1 PHASE SUPPLIER MFG HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH NIL (WATTS) LL (WATTS) CP BID BID +TAX LIFE CYCLE COST DELIVERY (WEEKS) HD SUPPLY - PORTLAND Cooper 39 19 22 46 367 N $3,066.00 3,334.28 $5,228.03 8-10 wxs GBXPRO GE 25 19 23 60 312 N 3,351.00 $3,644.21 $5,489.21 9-10 wkS GENERAL PACIFIC ErmCo 35 19 22 55 347 N 8 Wks PACIFIC UTILITIES PPI 40 20 25 58 342 N $2,781.00 $3,024.34 $4,959.34 9-11 wks HD SUPPLY - BENICIA 367 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 WRATHALL & KRUSI, INC. Howard IDduStrieS 37 25 29 28 297 N $3,516.00 $3,823.65 $5,252.40 8-10 wks ITEM'2 3,.ea. POLE MOUNT,37.5 KVA112 XV1240/120 V,1 PHASE DELIVERY SUPPLIER MFG HEIGHT DIAMETER WEIGHT NIL (WATTS) LL (WATTS) CP BID BID +TAX LIFE CYCLE COST (WEEKS) HD SUPPLY - PORTLAND Cooper 39 17 453 76 454 n0 3,792.00 $4,123.80 $6,111.30 a -lo wkS GEXPRO GE 26 20 432 81 444 N 4,020.00 $4,371.75 $6,340.50 9-10 wks GENERAL PACIFIC Ermco 35 19 509 86 375 N 8 wks PACIFIC UTILITIES PPI 40 25 511 76 469 N $3,783.00 $4,114.01 $6,157.76 9-11 wkS HD SUPPLY - BENICIA $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 WRATHALL & KRUSI, INC. HI 39 25 600 33 503 No 3,966.00 $4,313.03 $6,323.03 8 -lo wks ITEM :3 1,-: ea. PAX) MOUNT, 50 KVA, 12 KV, 240/120 V, 1 PHASE SUPPLIER MFG HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH NIL (WATTS) LL (WATTS) CP BID BID +TAX LIFE CYCLE COST DELIVERY (WEEKS) HD SUPPLY - PORTLAND Cooper 34 36 32 97 625 Y $2,992.00 $3,253.80 $4,398.80 10-12 wkS GEXPRO GE 33 36 39 103 561 Y 3,168.00 $3,445.20 $4,532.70 9-10 wks GENERAL PACIFIC Ermeo 36 36 20 114 N$2,756.91 $2,998.14 $4, 8 wkS PACIFIC UTILITIES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 HD SUPPLY - BENICIA 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 WRATHALL & KRUSI, INC. HI 40 42 38 48 474 N 3,410.00 $3,708.38 $4,480.88 6-8 wks ITEM 4 1,ea. PAD.. MOUNT, 225. XVA, 12 EV, 208Y/120 V, 3 PHASE DELIVERY SUPPLIER MFG HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH NIL (WATTS) LL (WATTS) CP BID HID +TAX LIPH CYCLE COST (WEEKS) HD SUPPLY - PORTLAND Cooper 398 2274 N $9,148.00 $9,948.45 $14,283.45 8-10 wks GEXPRO GE 64 65 51 399 2270 N $9,074.00 $9,867.98 $14,201.73 12-13 wkS GENERAL PACIFIC ErmCO 57 64 47 386 2149 N$8,199.97 $8, 8 Wks PACIFIC UTILITIES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 HD SUPPLY - BENICIA $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 WRATHALL & KRUSI, INC. HI 65 58 49 166 2520 No 9,326.00 $10,142.03 $13,914.53 6-e wxs ITEM 5 1, ea. PAD MOUNT, 1000 EVA, 12 W. 480Y/277 V, 3 PHASE DELIVERY SUPPLIER MFG HEIGHT WIDTB DEPTH ML (WATTS) LL (WATTS) CP BID BID +TAX LIFE CYCLE COST (WEEKS) HD SUPPLY - PORTLAND Cooper 1344 7701 N $17,343.00 $18,860.51 $33,526.76 8- 10 wxs GEXPRO GE 73 69 74 1306 6880 no $17,403.00 $18,925.76 $32,423.26 12-13 wkS GENERAL PACIFIC E—co 63 67 66 1226 6726 N8 324.09 ' $17,752.45 I wks D PACIFIC UTILITIES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 HD SUPPLY - BENICIA 0.00 5.07 8o•00 WRATHALL & KRUSI, INC. HI 73 77 63 515 7257 No $21,500.00 $23,381.25 $34,383.75 6-8 wkS m Z PT City of 'Z.lkzah ITEM NO.: 7d MEETING DATE: AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING PURCHASE FOR REPAIRS AND RECOVERING OF THE AIR -WALL AT THE UKIAH VALLEY CONFERENCE CENTER FROM OMNI CONCEPTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,986. Summary: Pursuant to the requirements of Section 1522 of the Municipal Code, staff is filing with the City Council this report regarding the purchase for repairs and recovering to the air -wall in the large banquette rooms of the Ukiah Valley Conference Center. The work was performed by Omni Concepts Inc. in the amount of $9,986. Background & Discussion: Community Services staff, in conjunction with the Purchasing Supervisor, researched qualified contractors to perform the needed repairs. There are very few companies that work on movable walls. One company (Omni Concepts Inc.) was located with offices in California that was capable of completing the needed repair and recovering work. The second closest company willing to perform the necessary services was located in New Mexico and the travel costs made the feasibility of working with them unrealistic. It is for this reason that Omni Concepts Inc was chosen as the sole source for performing the work on the air -wall. The air -wall is over eighteen years old which has exceeded the normal lifespan of ten to twelve years and therefore needed critical repairs. The wall is frequently adjusted and utilized and is an essential amenity for the operation of the rentals. The repair was necessary for both functionality and safety. The cost for the purchase is off -set by revenue from Conference Center rental fees. The purchase was charged to the Conference Center Equipment Repair Account 410.6190.302.000. The repair work that was performed is schedule to last another ten to twelve years. Fiscal Impact: MX Budgeted FY 10/11 ❑ New Appropriation ❑ Not Applicable F-1 Budget Transfer Required Amount Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Additional Funds Required $ 9,986 UVCC: Equipment Repair 410.6190.302.000 not applicable Recommended Action(s): Receive report regarding the purchase of repairs and recovering to the air - wall at the Ukiah Valley Conference Center from Omni Concepts Inc. in the amount of $9,989. Alternative Council Option(s): n/a Prepared by: Maya Simerson, Project Analyst, Kerry Randall, UVCC Administrator & Mary Horger, Purchasing Supervisor Coordinated with: Sage Sangiacomo, Assistant City Manager Attachments: n/a Approved: U__ Jane C ambers, City Manager ITEM NO.: 7e MEETING DATE: AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: REPORT OF ACQUISITION OF PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FROM EBA ENGINEERING FOR PREPARATION OF THREE MANDATED REPORTS FOR THE UKIAH LANDFILL Background & Discussion: In compliance with Section 1522 of the City Code, this report is submitted to the City Council for the purpose of reporting the acquisition of professional consulting services costing more than $5,000 but less than $10,000. The Public Works Department obtained a proposal from EBA Engineering for preparation of the 2010-2011 Annual Report for Storm Water Discharges, the second quarter detection monitoring report, the third quarter landfill gas monitoring report and filing respective data with State Geotracker Services for the Ukiah landfill. Staff reviewed the proposal and found the proposed fee of $7,431 to be commensurate with the scope of work. These reports are mandated requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Staff is in the process of developing a request for proposals for an extended contract for environmental compliance monitoring and reporting for the Ukiah landfill. Fiscal Impact: ❑X Budgeted FY 10/11 F New Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Additional Appropriation Requested $105,000 Landfill fund 660 660.3401.250.005 Recommended Action(s): Receive and file report of the acquisition of professional services from EBA Engineering in the amount of $7,431 for preparation of three mandated reports for the Ukiah landfill. Report is submitted pursuant to City Code. Alternative Council Option(s): N/A Citizens advised: None. Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works / City Engineer _ Prepared by: Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works — Engineering & Streets 40-- Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: None. Approved: Jan Chambers, City Manager ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: City a>'T-1k1:0f AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 7f June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF PURCHASE OF TWO DIGITAL MOBILE RADIOS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,559.80, TO MOTOROLA, INC. Background: Included in the fiscal year 2010/2011 budget is the purchase of two patrol vehicles for the Police Department. Our existing radios from retired patrol vehicles are well past their service life, and are no longer supported by the manufacturer. As a result, two new radios will be needed to equip these two new vehicles. Discussion: In May of this year, staff submitted bids to radio vendors, for the purchase of two new radios, which comply with the FCC specifications for police digital radios systems. For consistency in the police department fleet and the safety needs of the officers in the field, the police department staff has selected the Motorola Spectra XTL5000 mobile radio for the patrol vehicles. Bids were opened and Motorola, Inc. submitted the sole bid of $6,559.80, including sales tax. Staff awarded the bid for the two police radios to Motorola, Inc., in the amount of $6,559.80, to be apportioned from the account of 105.2001.800.000. In compliance with Section 1522 of the Ukiah City Code, this report is being submitted to the City Council for the purpose of reporting an acquisition costing $5,000.00 or more, but less than $10,000.00 Fiscal Impact: X❑ Budgeted FY 10/11 F-1 New Appropriation F-1 Not Applicable ❑ Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds title and #) Account Number Addit. Appropriation Requested $6,559.80 Public Safety Police Dept. 105.2001.800.000 N/A Recommended Action(s): No action required, notification of purchase of two police radios from Motorola, Inc. in the amount of $6,559.80 from account 105.2001.800.000 Alternative Council Option(s): Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Darren Wojcieszak, Police Captain Coordinated with: Chris Dewey, Director of Public Safety Attachments: N/A Approved: 0-41 � J Chambers, City Manager ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: `:'ity a-/-21/jah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 7g June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID TO CONDUCT A RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY TO FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC. FOR THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $ 34,915.00 Summary: Section 64665(a), Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations requires the City of Ukiah to conduct a watershed sanitary survey every five years. As required in our operating permit, the city must complete this watershed sanitary survey by December 31, 2011. Background: Since Redwood Valley County Water District (RVCWD) and Millview County Water District (MCWD) have similar requirements, it is prudent to conduct a joint study and share expenses. This same process was successful the last time such a survey was conducted. Requests for Quotations through the formal bid process were sent to eleven firms qualified to perform watershed sanitary surveys. On May 26th 2011, two bids were received, and the selected consultant was FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC. for the sum of $ 34,915.00. The City will act as the lead agency and issue the Purchase Order for the total amount and receive reimbursement from the other water agencies. The cost sharing agreement is as follows: City of Ukiah $17,457.50 (50%) MCWD $11,521.95 (33%) RVCWD $ 5,935.55 (17%) Although only $10,000.00 was budgeted in Account 820.3908.250.008 to conduct this watershed sanitary survey, necessary funds have been transferred to cover this expenditure with 50% of cost to be reimbursed by MCWD and RVCWD to the City Water Fund 820. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 11/12 New Not Applicable Budget Amendment Appropriation Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addtl. Appropriation Requested $ 34,915.00 Water Treatment Plant 820.3908.250.008 Contractural Services Recommended Action(s): Award bid to perform Russian River watershed sanitary survey to FORSGREN ASSOCIATES INC for the amount not to exceed $ 34,915.00. Alternative Council Option(s): Reject bid and refer back to staff. Citizens advised: n/a Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Prepared by: Loren Clifton, Deputy Director of Public Works Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager; Loren Clifton, Deputy Director of Public Works Attachments: None Approved: -e Jan Chambers, City Manager ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: city vf" 41kiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT FI%. June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION OF TERTIARY TREATMENT UNITS AT THE UKIAH WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND DIRECT STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Summary: Per section 22039 of the Public Contracts Code, staff is requesting Council's approval of plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Tertiary Treatment Units at the Ukiah Wastewater Treatment Plant Specification No. 10-18. The total Engineer's Estimate for this project is approximately $200,000. Background: Staff brings this project forward because it is needed maintenance. The tertiary treatment units consist of four 2 -MGD (million gallons per day) Siemens Microfloc Trident filtration units that are a necessary part of the treatment process for effluent disposal to the Russian River between October 1 and May 14. This project has been budgeted in the WWTP account, pending budget approval. The plans and specifications for the project are available for City Council and public review at the Ukiah Civic Center Engineering Department, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California. In addition, the plans and specifications have been posted to the City's website for review at the following web address - http://www.cityofukiah.com/pageserver/?page=purchasing main#395 Fiscal Impact: XBudgeted FY 11/12 F-1New Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addtl. Appropriation Requested $250,000 WWTP 612.3580.800.000 Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Tertiary Treatment Units at the Ukiah Wastewater Treatment Plant Specification No. 10-18. 2. Direct staff to advertise for bids. Alternative Council Option(s): N/A Citizens advised: n/a Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Prepared by: Alan Hasty, Assistant Civil Engineer Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager; Loren Clifton, Deputy Director of Public Works Attachments: 1 — Cover sheet — specifications Approved:-� - Ja Chambers, City Manager ATTACHMENT J CITY OF UKIAH MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR REHABILITATION OF TERTIARY TREATMENT UNITS AT THE UKIAH WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SPECIFICATION NO. 10-18 CITY OF UKIAH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482-5400 Bids Open: Thursday July 21, 2011 2:00 p.m. Office of City Clerk ITEM NO.: 7i MEETING DATE: AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE GREATER UKIAH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR A PORTION OF THE UKIAH RAILROAD DEPOT LOCATED AT 309 EAST PERKINS STREET AND APPROVAL OF CORRESPONDING BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR REVENUE COLLECTED ON THE LEASE. Background: The Greater Ukiah Chamber of Commerce (GUCC) has been a tenant of the Ukiah Valley Conference Center for over eighteen years. In reevaluating and restructuring their organization they have given notice for vacating their office at that location. The GUCC stated in their notice to leave that they plan to move to a new facility and "focus on member services". Additionally they have requested to lease office space in the Ukiah Railroad Depot Building. As you know the Ukiah Railroad Depot Building is recognized as a historically -significant, publicly -owned facility in Downtown Ukiah. The building is owned by the North Coast Rail Authority (NCRA) and is located at 309 East Perkins. The Ukiah Railroad Depot Building was constructed and used as a train depot beginning in 1928. However, Ukiah was last served by passenger rail service in 1971. Over the years, the vacant building has been plagued by trespassing, vandalism, littering, overnight camping, and other illegal activities which adversely impact business activities and property values. Reuse of the building was recognized as the desired method to discourage illegal activities and secure the building from unauthorized entry. Furthermore, rehabilitation of the structure preserves the historical and unique character of the Downtown which has been identified as an important factor for continued economic development. In cooperation with NCRA, the City of Ukiah secured a total of $283,384 in funds from the Transportation Enhancement Grant and Surface Transportation Improvement Program for a renovation project to restore the building to its original condition. In a subsequent agreement with NCRA, the City agreed to utilize redevelopment funds to cover the remaining construction costs for the project. As a result of the City's contribution, the City was granted possession and control over the building for a period not less than 50 years. In accordance with the lease agreement with NCRA, the City has the right to sublease the building for approved purposes designated as transportation related or as otherwise approved by Caltrans. In addition, the City has assumed responsibility for the maintenance of the building until such Recommended Action(s): Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a lease agreement with the Great Ukiah Chamber of Commerce for a portion of the Ukiah Railroad Depot located at 309 East Perkins Street and approval of corresponding budget amendments for revenue collected on the lease. Alternative Council Option(s): Determine the lease is not appropriate and provide direction to Staff Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Great Ukiah Chamber of Commerce Prepared by: Kerry Randall, Conference Center Administrator Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager and Sage Sangiacomo, Assistant City Manager Attachments: 1. Depot Information and Site Map Approved: 7 hambers, City Manager Subject: GUCC Railroad Depot Lease Meeting Date: June 15, 2011 Page 2 of 2 time as NCRA reestablishes regular scheduled passenger rail service to Ukiah and has the need to utilize all or a portion of the building for use as a train depot. Since its restoration and dedication on April 28, 2010, staff at the direction of Council has actively sought potential tenants. Discussion: Staff has worked with the GUCC to identify an appropriate location in the building, specifically the 182 sq. ft. room. A site map of the facility is included as Attachment #1 for reference. At this time, staff is negotiating a final lease agreement with the GUCC for the remainder of 2010. Staff request that Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a lease with the Greater Ukiah Chamber of Commerce for the room at the Railroad Depot referred to as the "Ladies' Lounge" in the amount of $500per month or $0.36 sq. ft. This rental fee includes the cost of utilities. The initial term will be for the remainder of the year and then will be renewed to an annual calendar lease. The lease will be administered by the Conference Center as part of the existing lease management services provided by the Division. A 15% management fee will be assessed at the time of collection and 85% of the revenue will be deposited to a General Fund account. Staff will continue to seek an additional tenant for the remaining one room at the facility. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 10/11 ❑ New Appropriation ❑ Not Applicable F Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Additional Revenue $0 Revenue (General Fund) TBD $5,100 $0 Revenue (Conference Center)TBD $900 UKIAH RR DEPOT LOCATION MAP AOOREST; M6.p8tIONSSrtw UIWH.GtWOMVA'bt@ FEDERAL PROJECT NO. STPLER•504tW3) SPECIFICATION NO, 0&04 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OCSCRVfiClr RE7utC6PA11ON OF 711E UIOUI ttR OEpOT, TNEPROlELTOICLOOEC r.Ia CNEnOY nLCNpEtt@{79; -CWfi LAT"'M TMI; auEOrplS FJCEl4 T RO4T{1LEIlPIF3MY OH17A1LAT10N CFAIIACCESSStEpNN01O -OFACE nCWY1EtlENTO PCR nlOa'RF(9AF'OtOlp INSiOftICALO1tOLE1t6 CODE. SECjLYl19a4 IN3rA •OISTAI2ATIGITxt61Vf10OTL71r1C1E6 WNEl1lIEW AppLWICEOOR ECtIpLE1RM7EA0ttEO. -LEWVACALNRIELECTItL'�11.1MORACES i71M SIWLI4EETWRfIFJit iiflE2{f17ETiGY nE'OWIEA,EIIT6 •nF3twALGF PAOIl NOI CnAFF111GIT06 UITERMANO f7k111O{t WHEREl Tt4NG, 1g F1OWIR,6tCEapiCgNIC. REIU6RlTA71GITOIHECOECJ�RFIICNE� - OlSTRIATIWl Of NIACCE'^Ma. OPENEOOUI71HpTH6CWR9ECFCClMfflLC7Kil NOWNERENEW CGISTfWCTIGIISAWEp,rffiV RES7Ft0041 PlSUTATIGL1W10E AOOEpr$CAILfL FGn PI INE C@IER MtE6 , APH; 037.1OT43 FmEEWCNKL1Ji5i lIOTIIEOUIREO p&T CeC]OOTSEOny{ OURpElO CCAC �IOr CAl1FI11ypAHl.i•To(NCALa1.Qr]pu CGDE .00T OOGCOEA3 aalilal ANEtCALFG10FOaY'TVA NECIIY ONC9Nf W641, A -14M SP>;YICSlllE: aFJxWCOE:iWIG1Ea0RT@ nRUC16RAL- OUOOWO iYP@ Till. tYPEVi 01 PRO M&UtXIWMW az OGWpA1NYU$ anOW OG{E atGnY&rWElO PWYa1Na: OCWAA"=LII.LO: TOTAL OCC MTLOA06TI Pia wMiNG,11 PEME pail E11M. "'Er p6n fAGSllI ::EGIL�1 WCIIAUtCAL; 2 E]f7is Tf4iOvomSt *u EATERpR WALLOPC,ILJ0.T, tlacpam6FntliF.OTRX1 nfiouw6o, tae mat 7An6ra7 . PROJECT DIRECTORY m7NEre Tt><rronn,cq�snLLnROAaANnrcERn PnOPEATYL7A *C1TV GGITACT"VAWCNEENIOR IW SLLWtARTAVENIte UNtNLG am A2% Eu mrattlEy{ Emu ISfana©'3rpNA:alma ARGtOTECr: f2-0 .OAItAYAOILtALA aNiAYAG W Ari 11nFC7URE, PI C CGl7AGT:ANOnOSE YrOrHI OttEEUTTEIi sTnEEl;f]aTE910 SAILPIW/ctECgG W1W T&: a15101a61] pNC �ISap LSWT FJ.Ee �.YtOe�avavaO4cm aTTNlelu,ue ouavElTE EtlOpfaE7R16 tls0.'7fl'Ef1: dtEEEK�B In![EVNiO5W1E.� WIJq'.E.Ga9t5 TEL' aaaalSTm &Aa:.LpLilTra7a] ELL• tTa>a�NepLWm. tlaP: CASAOOtit11E11 @tplEmO CGITACT: 77 fOLLL^ JUrI a]0lanl LTitE6T GU1rECoo OAaWaq GptP1: TR: S l6 rk i= n¢; tpvY>sF.�2apscoamv,A COSTCa7Nu,iwt;LFJAl10 aAYLaI{A:AOATEa CCNTAC[: LYI@ KPo7aGtER 515 4AIIAFT aITiEET StA1Em tW I FIWIGCCgG9at6y FEL• A,a•93•la!) FAR nslgf irol Elu: mua Tu@afbr—n�ey4em 1`114-11 ILtncv AnCIE7EGTURAI_ Aial twat atafit A-tl$ a1EIE1%ALJ107"AOOnEMO,,IOA SYLta^ v A -lm 01Ep%.vI1nwFpWI D=jm PROpOEm MT -01 FLOOR PUu/•EVSTEN:OEL,OTiEpAE1S AAAI fwcnpwi MQpOSWW1 CRAM A.011t ELEVATiGpJFMSiTESpROlggp A•1W igtS.@USrnlOpRCppTEp 4aa1 atiLowC A.Eat CaevAilmslTERM A -14M 501711ULE0 nRUC16RAL- 01 cwmlllu az EluarnlcnooFFl+AlrmrEN1 PWYa1Na: Pia ftLL=,GcOnf1G1MT pail POILWocMWmFLOOI1pW, WCIIAUtCAL; *u WCIWNGL CA.1EEt flail f1ECNitpCLLGiW10FtAOR PLNi VAGTN, baa ELECTArLCOyFI2en SLI, EtECIlOGLG10Wt0itaGlPWr E.M1.I ELECTRICAL Ofi7ALS Y- 1YLCK 4CS�u huKffivir+ m aw�lr� RML -ML (R% F0RTNE CJTY OF MEW LT1C_iTED AT 309 E PERIJNS SMEEi' UKULIL G9 95482 �1 wLun1 4T r� c MEN L am.w1 uNlnrl Y{L•tR aLLY;C Fli 1ur�¢rn i¢� vara LA.uru• m nrsacvw vF.lar41T wr 1' A,TJ LIMIRI+l .¢t tamL 1Lrr � or.c>,r m ua.vui °, aivrucnrLi, as Ukiah Railroad Depot 309 E. Perkins Street, Ukiah, CA Constructed: 1928 Owner: North Coast Railroad Authority Lessee: City of Ukiah for a period of 50 years Dimensions: 59' X 23'11" 1,415.07 square feet Interior: Architecturally designed for office use Permitted Use: Surface Transportation or as approved by Caltrans or the California Transportation Commission in compliance with the TEA Grant and STIP funding that was awarded to rehabilitate the Ukiah Train Depot building. Timeline: The rehabilitation of the Ukiah Train Depot should be completed by the end of March 2010 and ready for occupancy in April 2010. Contact: Kerry Randall City of Ukiah 200 S School Street Ukiah, CA 95482 707/463-6706 krandall `tyofukiah.com Note: The North Coast Railroad Authority may demand the right to use the premises for railroad purposes. ARCHITECTURAL NOTES -PROPOSED UPGRADES OIgfVSa OWu=E)X=nWAIL rmLaugmudmAmmmCm9 WI KVGRLIIVQaawtlAlAr VuwYWLYCLLWISwC="td O CC�nBYCLLCMUMASAM a Oca+awtYAYsrroawc'a ssY� 81vMo A=W t.= O(�f5�� m R 8fm=mi/GLuN]YNsssalJ& =w uMWIDaIaaaWbL YaCL A%p4m"avmmm Nu,= O Ca�ImmamAawamAaotpn; M07.SF71�?IFV."atZtY.CENI ISSwICtt`nt1l AnEum *av".Tu=c Anmuw aLVLprcua:avuecsn fa VtiwfC3LAti%OWi7fNldi[n 0/�11}.a/nim= ama,Zma Il IaYN.t LunwLcnuarwcrLmnauaL masenosa Owsuusssnnsmo tpnaw "Awasme"MMA"" ICaEawASAlmawNAtiAIA mrwtuwalGae6nv+t CVICiCunTtFMMFNMMUT '2EnfCCYJL191t1ULa@V O/CW1ACLfG1/11VR:CKAASSam m CsGOC4'0tOGFIB1ad#siaFLlala6 WCmMM1Wmifl flCOnsn m nvicQHI /alm.waflnatG'Yll. 'MA2 p�anmvmcaravawsc OLLmW�iNL,A UNmQlYAa,a7UnmasrFAJL n7limflnlp'Ma9D�CRN7IGMQGI au,tlL h7i�WEisFG0.uaa revluwLGa�xwaom�;aaaar O CQCMAM On/aIragyL/RIN.si01 Ou wCFYiIKIDIOGWOFAOAaNaWR MEI9 KMLD DX aLNf4OJA1WIp7AQf1EtW111tIR jYAG® n'99®ENfYWLR'atW5ECA73M nt25NRJsrtxwaAtn'rawfCot RAilaIISYRnd'NELifC7I1FOa0'tvil/QMLAt1�miG ° OFwnal3vmsamLmmm�.t� nLNLRmNi2 tRtnRlFLG'Ofi[�IIWt. .. Owrum prtm.MnAawwtrAaw ppENTw. O�C[RnMNfiWII rN110GtlQOIiGH7fimY� r a'.amutm - fIInLLw�WAwflEWG7mf6' oJl'QOGucwALwnaA4L�mlit rnuts�c�aacaasae arsmuz« arar/; A:wam w�Y�Aiarxrma Wim: Onua OFim2iwapl[• m°ax:Asarxuecm. o IMMAg�/aomromeEM Nsaum�WLwomnmum O tmscaivua asvwonv�atteRr�nLnna OfCWWA PRNi16i7gm �FEDi'DIVA1N(a[m.la71A16 7B1a3{CGf17n W/ QLq�FaallSWtAp�a 1N[rEnASfF1InCLOLAGW[ CAILV�Y/.IDatltAID/i4dYA5m OY7[NKTIu�AFf�1f3iI fXM1• awLLLAQCaECG➢;rAra�CWYE1 �aMCtfCiiQlID:wFYE t8it@iTM11/ifCtiCCm� w�rrtAttoi ONWCELunF0.'i$AIdGtN3Eaf Nvtcwe ' rxxveUMMMca[ca�mmo ovnooanmaawru/a�mala�a smasstusr ma•Aaa maxmvee wm ne.aaavmue. �s�LOF+�aY mmrn ' ¢ QsAiAI*M+ t.s.sM _ nRMIMCFW�xrwn. Aa/ =wftuCF=I FllE J@�Y/IW4a'S7A{II. • PTA�sCE •{Iaai�LII- e,.T.i "AIL'• Of1 Carl n- L� Sec n�4eer`b-tea ai sE y�°C• nam�xis nauNLws w-r•y4s REHAWUrAMON MRTHE CCIYOFUKLIH LOCAIM AT 309 Ls PMUMM nuahT UKU" CA 95482 08-01 swg.i+n am -m stun As== CA= WPM, n as g ➢AAA]! an anaan :v ea.wa LCvaia� uAunm arua�sCrtvun�vnrs asAn� sswar wvac� trAeammmwiwrya It.611'34 .rswn•mmsCosm y�p,pt-�1a888 NIa1.TlJa c wnam .w Y.s w w .P- �f r F, t, � r •� d i ,' l `3w Kt' i w , -sr h ;j in '_ y SUFI J 1. ^ ks� �•C� 4 t. I F ice, 9�f F LL j'�' {� L •$L... 6 It `� +."` a `� � . ,,, -..fie§ 4 `�'•+ %� " ", � � • `"4 �k �'^� r a� as , y< 8 3 -. „ .- 9k , ,? ;fes �•. ;. � b _ �' � ,; �;. a 1 A Yt f^ni >•p ,%!� j 61 t ��'".�f '`•`.�',.. r' S< '�' " ray dd �b , 4 �r t wa � , , • S �5 0��`. "� � t } -� � ""' ,,r.•--�, � � ' n�• yes i S'�� �' 44 s.,. � � «•4 ' i'�..a'.1""t-'T�"t &e ,� � � *�'`Q. Y °$ �` .t a v - <a. ���MMM t — �'r i �Ju'ate' ' t.... r <... } n 17, 1 � e.. v . 111111 XX U . r ITEM NO.: 7j MEETING DATE: June 15, 2011 City of T-1ki rfi AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING PAYMENT TO CITY OF LIGHT SOUND AND RECORDING FOR THE SOUND EQUIPMENT AND SOUND TECHNICIAN SERVICES FOR THE 2011 SUNDAYS IN THE PARK CONCERT SERIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,820. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the requirements of Section 1522 of the Municipal Code, staff is filing with the City Council this report regarding payment to City of Light Sound and Recording for the sound equipment and sound technician services for the 2011 Sundays in the Park Concert Series in the amount of $8,820. Contract is attached for review. The pricing is $1,470 per show for equipment and technician. There is a separate fee for loading and unloading at each show in an amount not to exceed $192 per show. That service is billed and paid incrementally as it is scheduled. The Sundays in the Parks Concert Series requires a high level of professional sound equipment and sound management. City of Light continues to provide excellent service and contribute to the success of the series. The event is funded entirely by private sponsorship, and the funds are held in a trust account (900.205.226) that the City manages. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 10/11 ❑ New Appropriation F-1 Not Applicable ❑ Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addtl. Appropriation Requested $8,820* Sundays in the Park 900.205.226 N/A *funded entirely by private sponsorships Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive report regarding payment to City of Light Sound and Recording for the sound equipment and sound technician services for the 2011 Sundays in the Park Concert Series in the amount of $8,820. Alternative Council Option(s): N/A Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Katie Marsolan, Community Services Administrator Coordinated with: N/A Attachments: 2011 Contract for Citv of Light Recording and Sound Approved: �--. Jane ambers, City Manager Attachment #1 This contract is for the services of Keith Gaudette at City of Light Sound (COL) and Recording and The City of Ukiah for the 2011 Ukiah Sundays in the Park Concert Series. City of Light agrees to provide sound reinforcement, monitoring desk, load in and out for the concerts at Todd Grove Park in Ukiah and the appropriate staff to ensure a quality event. COL will also abide by the guidelines set out in each tech rider provided by each band. The City of Ukiah contracts COL for the following concert dates: June 5 Mitch Woods $1,470.00 June 19 Janiva Magness $1,470.00 July 3 Hip Service $1,470.00 July 17 Funky Dozen & Top Shelf $1,470.00 July 31 Pete Escovedo $1,470.00 August 14 Robert Cray $1,470.00 Total: $8,820.00 If requested by the City additional load in / load out services may be provided by COL for the concerts by providing two people, for a maximum of five hours per concert, to be paid by the COL and invoiced separately from the services quoted above to the City of Ukiah. Load in for great is for 12:OOpm each day, or earlier depending on the sound requirements of the act with the band load in at 3:OOpm and the sound check is from 4-5:30pm. ALL SOUND CHECKS ARE TO BE COMPLETED BY 5:30pm AT EACH CONCERT. Concerts will begin at 6:OOpm sharp. COL will possibly act as the second on mixing in case the band comes with their own sound man. Detail will be forthcoming. City of Ukiah will also provide ample electrical requirement for each concert. Payments will be made on the day of each concert. City Manager City of Ukiah Date Keith Gaudette City of Light Date ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: Ci1y ,r,1`zrk,iah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 7k June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR PROPOSITION 84 STATEWIDE PARK PROGRAM COMPETITIVE GRANT FUNDS FOR RIVERSIDE PARK DEVELOPMENT. Background & Discussion: City staff has identified the Proposition 84 Statewide Park Program as a possible source of funding for the continued development of Riverside Park. The grant application is currently being drafted and cost estimates are underway. The components in the application include restoration and public access into the passive open space in the south half of the park. This will include trails, benches, open space, meadow area, riparian habitat and a bioswale which will treat run-off from the access road and parking areas. The grant application requires the attached resolution to be included with the application (Attachment #1). Riverside Park is located at the east end of Gobbi Street. The park location includes Rusty Bowl BMX, Ukiah Youth Baseball and more than 20 acres of open space along the riverfront property. The City was successful in securing grant funds and is currently facilitating the construction of "Phase 1". Phase 1 will include approximately 2,500 linear feet of trail and 1,200 linear feet of river bank riparian restoration. The draft grant application for Proposition 84 Park Programs proposes to develop the trail beyond the phase 1 area connecting park users to the open space elements. Currently a majority of the park space is undeveloped and is difficult to supervise and maintain. If funding and subsequent development is completed, the improvements will be a benefit for future users and a benefit for the long term maintenance and sustainability of the park space. Development of permanent trails and use areas will improve the sight -lines and visibility throughout the park, making the park safer, more enjoyable, and more manageable for the City. The application for funds includes continued design and planning work. If grant funds are awarded, staff will seek direction from Council to continue the design. No matching funds are required for this competitive grant. Fiscal Impact: H Budgeted FY 10/11 ❑ New Appropriation ❑X Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Recommended Action(s): Adopt the resolution authorizing the application to the Proposition 84 Statewide Park Program for the Riverside Park. Alternative Council Option(s): Determine the application to the Proposition 84 Program is inappropriate at this time and do not move to adopt the resolution. Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: N/A Prepared by: Katie Marsolan, Community Services Administrator Coordinated with: Sage Sangiacomo, Assistant City Manager Attachments: 1.Resolution Approving Application for Grant Funds Approved: _ -- Jan Chambers, City Manager Attachment #1 Resolution No. 2011 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR PROPOSITION 84 STATEWIDE PARK PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the Statewide Park Program, setting up necessary procedures governing the Application; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application(s) before submission of said application(s) to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete the grant scope project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby: Approves the filing of an application for Riverside Park and 1. Certifies that said applicant has or will have available, prior to commencement of any work on the project included in this application, the sufficient funds to complete the project; and 2. Certifies that the applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s), and 3. Certifies that the applicant has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the contract shown in the Grant Administration Guide; and 4. Delegates the authority to the City Manager to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the grant scope; and 5. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines. Approved and adopted the 15th day of June 2011 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number 2011-_ was duly adopted by the City Council following a roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Joanne Currie, City Clerk ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: City aJ_'Z-1kiafz AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 71 June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF A SLIP -IN STYLE PRE -MIX ASPHALT PATCHER IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,632.00 PLUS TAX AND CORRESPONDING BUDGET AMENDMENTS. Submitted for the City Council's consideration and action is staff's recommendation to approve the purchase of a slip -in style pre -mix asphalt hot box patcher in the amount of $34,632.00 plus tax. When buying asphalt, minimum purchase quantities are required. This forces the immediate use of the asphalt, with the risk of wasting what asphalt isn't used. By purchasing this equipment, this will allow for greater utilization of the asphalt material, which will result in less waste. Proposals were received from three vendors. Below is a tabulation of the quotes received: Vendor Price (less tax) Pavement Technologies International Corporation $34,632.00 Municipal Maintenance Equipment $39,496.00 Nixon -EI i Equipment Co. $44,830.05 It is staff's recommendation that Council approve the purchase of the slip -in style pre -mix asphalt patcher by Stepp Manufacturing, in the amount of $34,632.00 plus tax. $30,000.00 has been budgeted for this purchase in 100.3110.800.000. Staff is requesting the authorization of two budget transfers to make up the difference for this purchase from the following accounts: $7,000 from 100.3110.690.001 and $1,000 from 100.3110.690.002. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 10/11 1-1 New Appropriation F-1 Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted $30,000.00 Amount Transfer $7,000 $1,000 Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addit. Appropriation Requested Street Machinery & Equip. 100.311.800.000 Source of Funds (title and #) From Account Number To Account Number Street Special Supplies Asphalt 100.3110.690.001 100.3110.800.000 Parks: Port -o -lets 100.3110.690.002 100.3110.800.000 Recommended Action(s): APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF A SLIP -IN STYLE PRE -MIX ASHPALT PATCHER IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,632.00 PLUS TAX AND CORRESPONDING BUDGET AMENDMENTS. Alternative Council Option(s): Do not approve the purchase, and provide alternate direction to staff. Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works and City Engineer Prepared by: Mary Horger, Purchasing Supervisor Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: N/A Approved: a Chambers, City Manager ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: [pity g0Z.1kiafi AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 11a June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING ON URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF PLAN Background: City Council is required to update its Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years. These updates are on the years ending in "5" or "0". Prior to adopting the update, the City Council must provide prior published notice, provide direct notice to Mendocino County dated March 25, 2011, and conduct a public hearing on the plan. The public notice has been published and Mendocino County has been notified all as required by law and the matter is on the agenda to conduct the public hearing and consider the adoption of the plan. This plan is due for adoption prior to July 1, 2011 per the State of California, Department of Water Resources (State). The State had planned to provide the 2010 plan guide book in October of 2010. However, the State did not release the final guide book until April 8, 2011. This has put all agencies in a crunch to complete all the timing requirements and get the plan adopted by the deadline. In September of 2010, staff sent Request for Proposals to 17 engineering firms for the preparation of the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan as required by the Department of Water Resources. Three proposals were received. On February 16, 2011, Council awarded the contract to Carollo Engineers in the amount of $64,200. On June 8, 2011 staff presented the plan for community input. Notice was sent to numerous public agencies and other interested parties on May 26, 2011, requesting comments on the plan. The city has received no written comments to date. It should be noted that this plan is a living document and can be amended at any time. The city does not have to wait for the next five year plan to update. The plan has been available for public inspection as of May 26, 2011 and has also been available on the City's website. Submitted with this ASR is a revised UWMP update (Attachment 1). Continued on Page 2 Recommended Action(s): Conduct a public hearing and adopt the resolution adopting the revised update to the City's Urban Water Management Plan. Alternative Council Option(s): Open the public hearing, receive public comment, and continue the hearing to provide additional information or revisions prior to acting on the plan. Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Jane Chambers, City Manager Prepared by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works and Jarod Thiele, Public Works Administration Coordinated with: David Rapport, City Attorney Attachments: 1 - Revised UWMP — June 9, 2011 2 - Resolution Adoatina UWMP Approved:- JaoyChambers, City Manager The City Council should conduct the public hearing on the proposed plan. A resolution is included, if the City Council decides to approve the plan. (See Attachment 2.) The Council can request additional information and continue the public hearing, if it so chooses. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 10/11 F-1 New Appropriation FX1 Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted ted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addit. Appropriation Requested Estimate of Average Annual Potential Groundwater Recharge Volume Contributing to the City of Ukiah Water Supply Sources Average Estimated Tributary Watershed Volume Total (square miles) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) Potential For Groundwater Recharge Surface Water Sources Russian River East Fork 105 77,000 1 West Fork 100 126,000 2 Eel River Imports -- 102,300 3 Total Surface Water Sources: 305,300 Potential Runnoff from Tributary Area Ukiah Valley Tributary Watershed: 116 146,160 Ukiah Valley 21 26,460 Total Potential Run-off from Tributary Area 172,620 4 NOTES: Estimated flow based on gaged flow at USGS Gage #11461500 East Fork Russian River Near Calpella, CA less Potter Valley Project imports, as recorded at USGS gage # 11471099 Potter Valley Project (tail race only) near Potter Valley, CA. Period of record water year 1976 through 2002. 2 Average annual Gage flow recorded at USGS gage # 11461000 Russian River Near Ukiah, CA. Period of record 1912-2010. 3 Estimated future Eel River imports 4 Total water from preciptation tributary to and falling on the Ukiah Valley. Assumes run- off of 1,260 acre-feet per square mile, as measured at West Fork gage. 6/8/2011 GAUKIAH, CITY OF\Analysis\2110-019P-Unimpaired flow in Ukiah Valley.xlsx ME33matm N.k. P.dy, Uwd-, 0 b— Vx11,, Yorkville, and 11-1— N mom Potter Valley Project Y 5 Miles' .r v ..r....w�mm...mmm. •Sfeo0o0Y.oe.•. •0000• mm0r1o1o.••o••a• •0••.r•r00*0• oer•e*4 aomr4*r4o9rrrowrr se,••p..e•eo 000.0. rr •.oeo.•.4or0 Ne4p• ' ro•0••e.•0f •• 6osorro60rawW e!l.M +ro•lreoa•w . .. "; .•000900000 roerW•re.OSrre6•v*oprefrr••1ao 000awe00eep0 ..... raoamro4r4mormmrmaaorm• 4 ' 00!00 .•00000 9000.• 000•.0 om. . ••9• 000.0. 000.0:, 0000. 000.0 •••••.•0 a 0eo6- _. .*.e ..o00r0ww000e •Nf0 00000...•*0000*........ . 0e 0*.0000000000.•0•*.*0. •• •••* 000*••.•e •0000.00000.00. •*•*..•....f. 00000*•*• •e*0•reee*00po S".l.600-0..• .0.0.0.0000 •000000......• 0.00...•ere.. ..0•.....90000 •00.0.....0... 0ra4.30Sd40. y0u.W.;v.O.•0.0..,,,00.0.0.".�mamYrY,„Yararvu•wm. <•. - .fe*.O.•.••.••OerOr e.re*••0wp 0••*0 0•s0•o0ee•.*e••0pe•.••0pee.ofoee0.00e• 00o.00r00e•••*•• ••.••..r0e0re0rrfe0• 0*r0e• e*00efe•e•e•!re•••w ••.0.0••0•000 m•0.e••ea0000 **0e000e•00•a0•.!*••r•0•e aa.rr*rlpa.o0rre•e0909ererepeopoa*•o0eo0ree00aaP.•o0000•00 0e••O•r0f0eO0r.r.e9ro4*••••e•9®m.a 0e0e0e00*•0••0.000•000e00e00• ••0e0or0o0e*00 e a ..- re 0000.,.. ,, o.•e•.rs.r*•••so.0or00.000••0• .0*0.000e000*ep• 00.0•e•0.0e0e apea6*0oaerrrrae000pP4e•*rs o•e*000o.od�. r00e0se00o0e•0e•p•p••••o•.epee0• •0.0•••.•0•...00000 •••epee!•!.• e1r•e•r0o0ro•rr•••e.e.-.*weer "Bosses, 0!000:0 00*eP•m0.•p0•*oe•.••.e0e*•• ..**.0..••.0.000 00w00*•0.0eee 60.00! •04o•opo6oe..s 0rr0•�-0a •.o;.*.**9r.. '... **ew••0.••a..0•e.0.e000ea*•r0opr• o0.• 0*•00*00•*0.0 •.0*00.0rf 000 o0.4®rla0rer•er***0er*e•*w* •0**•.,r•r�:.1,--11 e0•...••..0•.0.0.0*eer*.•e•*0*pe 00..re0000r*e*•*• *•er.rr••r*0e• aPrOee•a6.rrr190.0e*••t**•• ••0.0.....:. .•..e.0.00e00000*eOfpl.e.......... 0••900.*e.••..••.• •9••Ope••6*• a11_•1•mme•m••re•r0.9••***i a• •..•...*:*'i ••eOefOrd" •0*p•e••rerwr0**•e0p•e0p.•eerp.*••.1.. Oerpe-00*.*.00... 0 '.•00Pw09r*0. •r.W0Yr00•m•0.f m•*••10•••••••*a .•t}+.•R***e9*•.Orr a<.: S: x. ,;. ¢. •e•pr••••e0!••••0.•frr•reer00er ••a •06.••00•.••..r0.w*m00•• •0••••••••.. •r•e6maal*rte*009*000rem•m•0 iia .*.!e•0*e0.•f••a0sre•.•.s0s10•0••.eryee0s•,err9.O.fe0eeeeefOO•re0•0ap••oe.e•e0*eO0pre0.0:•0•.pe*ee.••0. ••o0f0m4.e• See •*1r0.1r••r00mmaowowmee*•i* 0r..6*.**.o9�i,*.*•wOrrF9ras0*0*0.0r, a0.*. 000.0000 1• 0. ra•*.*4.a •:. waP'9"*•„0000 •.o.••oreeo0000*OPepep••me•eop0•.•.0••.•0.0ea00e0efa0•! •r•••e�aoo0• es.r0r.l.woreolrar.m..mgrrsi9 ••0.0•i.••s-w,*,*.,*w,. oyiae� 0 .*a00rp•ep0eee••eeeeo.e.eo..r0000er00*rp0ep0re.•0eo••.• 9u 09•ire0.0r r•er.614arroar • •m**:•••**:9..1rra�•0,.r,ar�r ►0000. r00001P!•..•.•♦Pr•.•000er•••.•f ♦•.e1w06ee••eP0**e•••e.•.l09• 0.9e••pee•P• 1aYm•rr..r4•m,: •e•••0e0.•s000rerw•.•000.*•..0.!*m•0!0.0�•0•*0ees*.•.*.0es*e•o•�.e0•.0•.•0w0fo•oae••�0•0••.*•.•00•ae�*e00*0•e0•e•e000•S.•ere•ee000•0*000o•*••0l*•o0eop00r0•.oee9rre.•*.0fr.efrm0•.0ee0eosa00p!e!.•0•.0r0.•w*••00•000•�ow.0*•0..rre.*•O•r0*0•0•s*re•0090•0e..•0.fr.0ar.•**•.ar•0P0•*a•rsre•.we*•.•e.0.a•r••e.0e•r00.••••.0e••*Peloi0p.e••e0rwfo•0r.re•e••0e.eP•a000e0e.0•ar•e•••00e•0r*w•.••ee•ar•.0•.r•e000•o.e•0!•O.a••f.wp•u0r4*e•009f•e*e*P0ps000e**p•e•e.e0• *we•o.eer0*f0*sp.pee♦p0•.or00s*e•0e.e•oa••wp*•0.rae•*•••0w•w*re•e••11.e*•eee.00w000paeee0••p•00•*•00*•e0ee.•0••*Oes••*0•0..ppo0*w0ie.eaY..0e.000!00pe0•0••0oee0•.•0•o0pe0•up.0se•00•••00••e.ee00.000 upefp.0•e.•00..e0/e••e..e0e•..•0s•00eoe.e0••0•.00•0•ee•.0•..000e•o00•esr♦.0p•00•0•oe.•00•.00.0••0•rp••ee0rO•0e•re0.e•e.0.0*e•0.0•ee•*0eepe*•ee.e0!•e•*es••w•.0o•••l*eeee0pp0eeerer0oe0rew.ewe9.ep0.••f0f•em0.ewm0ere00.p0..•el00•e000s••000•ef0..owr0•e0..e**0re0•00•.0•o.0••e•0••mi .9.•0�0s0• 0••9*0.•erv•0.•er••reereoerrer••o•es•r0••0.1•re.00•••0•0••0p100w0.•1e0004r•r*r.•* **r'*;ri0a*0a•r:Naa•m•r0•.a0r..0e•..a•0•0•0 0'. 0•e.9r0r.90•90.eo:•9*••09*.0�re1*�0a0i0.e.f090s00**r0l.•r•••e10ro,••e•90r9o•'•••*r0o0**oe09.0r1a*!•••0er0o•9.r.e0****oe.010*r•�.0•.•••*••.e�0o9••*aeiW•0••P•0**o9.*aeo0 "o0•0••e 1f0•m.r.ea. 004r.r0e;a.*0o•0oar0o*9oo.s0**s•rrm*0*9.a**...•erm Se*00••o.0•••a0�x.*r•r6r,r•0oore.w»•mr4merr Vsme*rm :.roem„ Srm•oe0,o44� ,rmas .*;a.;e: .,.*a * P1*. a! •00..0..*00**00•000*0r0•0r0... 'i*0e 4a1.0046960.aSt"•• •0**06-6 111 •000000*0** •.001.000000• .61000.000 e0.repo.•.e.w•f0 •• •0.0000000• *ra*r..•.0•a•rm0••6..... • •*epe.0es••0emoa 0•*e•0•ee0•o••0or 090•eq010e•r•oYra.1Y.•6 p••oe•.••••eeo.0..l000seFork •0000•••0spPe0*o•.. e**0.o•000000e00*0 60*0*04' *•ro*ar.0000000000*....•..•.••e...r.a0000.......... rf 0000.............• r**•O:,It *r0.0.0*a*p.0.0.0.0......SOO" 00o1 0* ...........0e•m r•e**.00s• ..........•u 000 Soso}0o4060.e0.. •000000 so 0009 •e ..... SO. 6*rm9e9e•*f*6**•*a•* 0 e000000".0ac : •o0*em6aer*mea•e•.r. ie oe•earraWeeYmr .: •00ee•e0e0s0••0*••0••e•••0•eoa•..e•0•a0po**•f •m0e••••0 9.••fro0 w **0000• e.. o•4�'morragroYr.a,_.. Ymmw4mmr44wmmgv> ,:. 0.0.00000r00e0r00ep0ppoepe••e.0.0e00r000e0er0 ea 000••0• s••0•••0r00o000*e •0.•00000•.000•.00p0e0e*.!e•••e•.•0.0000.0*ee00 r��••. '. •.•0.00.r0eo uae• 0 •eel.••a1!•r•••e0eeeeepw0e *.**00.0•*'**.••••0*f 9000. 00.0.0'me•••p•.••ro• 0*•.r.•.e.•••.0•• 000 . rpe•P.s00p•.e••.oi•rr•.*•• •0•eeep•peeeoee•OmSm,�V:. e.oe.00e.0.000.0000.0e0p.esro*e..e••o..000•eeere e•e.••o.e0r.0e00:oac- •.ep0a•.0..eer.e0.00*0.00e•p••••••0.0e000e0eee•0• .pe*ep••0.a 00.00Yc 0pee0.•e•♦'r0a..o•0ere.es u0f000op•ee.e.•a4s..}9-.•f0oef **e*0se•*.e.-. ee•a0.ee..ee•.eoe.0.10p.rf s0ee00mre.e•..r•1...0' r ue000.*oip•.efeo:, o0eso00o0000000000ee0p.!•••p0•e.r•00fse•♦0N ee•p�r0 •.00100*00oss00pe�,.:. •0.o•.e.0re0os0o000.000•o0!•0erpe.••000e0.000oee 0,, a a ues•0�0o•r0.0 j •00000eee0p.eee!.6•e.•.000•eo0e0e0•m000•p•*a.er0.1Y'•e 400 �_• • r.mmrv.h,gr,y,,-.,ea.a.aaa aa�usaara aa.mmw+vmammcam.......... . 4.........+,�:., 00.000.00pe*0•••r••e•.04•.0•a0r00000**.0•..le•e!•*:••. 0000 00 oor.S•o r4e4.raroaorarwro.ors•or4owa•4o.wr1Y11raeaq•romrrrlr4.+. ..•0O.••ee!•••.•'r•rrrw••r'erlere.•.•e••...•*r••9ermwP0le e•••. r•rW.r- ,a• ♦1*4044 e10WWr04440w4ga4•.1a.r0••149e4r4waWglrr•14.•erWm•�;a ... e0pe•ee0..0•.0.o0o00ee0*sa 000•a!P•4 •.aw4.•e0*ee0•.9e* ape 00.400 r1rr:,r•eia rm.erm4r91orwrerro•ra•*.e i6o64**oPSrrroa•1or•*1.am 0•.re0ee0e*r0ee0p••••e••••..r..•00.ei0e00a.e••eos0;i•;; 0.0 •arra* *e*• a110errr0r6o606a.eeoa•errrirlm90••rwwe•re*e0oeia6mroaa.vr- _ 0000.000000*•0e•e•r•m•0.•r•!a•00.•00a 00000*04••0•*• 0000 040440 roer4orWraee06er•06r6•.•ooa01eW00o6r0a 60ro*o90oorom4ePserai.4 0000•.pe•.lfe•1r..e.00•ere00e0ep.p•P-•e•.0•..r0e0.re•0 'p 0000 "a 0000. 1.••906•m0••m041.[P10e11W1Wi4•rrt•riaereWeWirrr r.0 e06w1r1.1rirer •aa••pe•ewo••0..•0e0or0e000e0esei•osa ueseoe0.e04• 0000. 00000 100.00*pea*o•s.•.•eir/oro*mr•emerroo•o0e6Wmoro6reeeaalrare.•r - - ere.r00f ref r000.•OeOee••OO•.er•...•00•�*e0*P*.pp•*i} !•.f 4mtl1 r*!i00O.09ef00rp♦f•0•*•e0rr••a00ap609.6OPp•ee.0a0eerpre06.0e.• •r*• o0•*.a0 HOer•mmee0wei••s.•0. w 00.00*4rai•s*•eo•sr .f 0•• 0000 *e.:0ro*reo a rei-•ra••0e*eee*o0o0r101•••••*r10r1rera90rree*es*• 090mm 00.00* 00000. 0-00 0.000.0••�f .•••w•••0a0e00� 000.0. 0,40efine**rf*oa4 e:is4ealsoW•Wwr•re0aro.e.er•leair•4o.4o•aororr •r. 9099•••• •pf.epa0•e•o. • .• .•**0004•00.00w00•e 0000 000 e•1r446*a••i�••:i•e9rrewa•rer•4*erea•0em••ae6.0oer0a•eor -s 0,000 •••••••0• 0e00ep*e •*•***•• ••orf*0000,00p••eo0.e 0...w •maw `me***w*N.•'e e0eeal••o•o•e*oer9ra9mrm9e•eo•e•roefr6•i6eorr •*••••aa••!••9 m00•me•u•.•99•0• •e0r00e0erss0 •rf err m*sar0we0•*w*•rmrar•r•6*a•.eel•.♦•e••!9.0raa••46amoe0r9r* ••••.0.9•••0000••e*••••••r••••.•90090009mm00m SO oo0e*•0s wr. aw*aw•rr0er0r•o*ie4lrraa/e*eyes •0a•®losrro0r0re•..soroWowOr .. 0000••009••00*00•m**•e*•••••••••0.0m•0099.0•e0••*009 .r r000oei 0.s• 001 saerra♦4•emm•o9sre6•�o��r.99or0o*9ir•oe►ors0esef es4ererrr•i•r •*•••0•e••••o•••.9.99909990090•*m•*•*•*•9.9900.9e99*• *000� !!!rr ai r wa r*a0arpo.•f0a*0*ire•o*oo•a/s6ew*oeso9*r0iaerr0sao*o4iir0mr9aao ••••r•.0•••0••0 .... 00.0000• e.T.0..p• 00. 64.►rsp•ereoe0r•00,1*604960►a6•0*00*0001 ao00ys00a r+erlrsa•Boor o. - *e••.•9••0••0.•0*00m•**•••*•••9••0••aa900m•�0m•0••ea•** •0.r�' r ai10r►0e6eir•ei4eeese•eas*•f 9,900000 wm•*ese 4*0eeasaor0rr0s •0 e*ecce**!9•••••.r••0*09••me*•ee••••••••••0r990•mm00e•9•m • e •. '•� ®-rofr;r*•oor0o00*6r9,o reoom*•ala.*0wo•600000•se 1.•mrero0orers•s ro .. •r•00.99••m0**00•••••*•••••••909.9.9•m9**0m**•••4*•'••9• ••• 0aarlmeor9•aSr6wi..rwe• u4oaemlaaga••w•r14a06rowaawram•m•o�r •00000000.00090*•••.•e••••••••909f99*m9•**m•*••••••o9•f •9999 e�0* ,®a. iia errma.a4aa•rgrl'ro4worawoa -ram.o.oaooraro4o4a.rrYamomo , •*••a.••••••0.••0•••0rm•••ee0•em••**••••9.9•••9.99••••• ••*r•i.•.9 01.wa*rYmr'"�rmmrmmmmmrmaa4mar• mmmm.mo.maaarmrmmmaammm m.m •000*•1•••••••ae••••0••0.000000rm9•••e0**!*errl0l0ffe0 '006`6.0, m -469.06 a.m. m• rr... 46-0 0••..... ammp.. ' rr••r••.r.0.f •00••000*•0•m•ie.•*•••*•••9•e.•r90•em!•r eer*r`*#60 qra*v> •*eSS00000• ^66.m.uT "' 00!00 0... arra•••m'm 0.1.ASa Spm il'r• •**r•••*•••••.••99••.0mm**0m•*er**rr*e0*o00.ee0•ma •• 00•*00 rw • re aa. •0m••*•r•*•*999• `m' ••••.•** aN m.m..m4mm •dA.4 •0040 m. m.. •. •••.09.000000••00•••••••••.••00••09000.00••••*••9• !••009. •0 0* *• ^"r' •••0.900.00000••••0 •90.0000•• r m0..m.rmmaarmaa0 am . •.0.1.0000.000.0009•••••••0••••••0.9.000.0r9r.••• •••0•• j.r• *•1 0e• •*..••00.000.90►••0•••••9•••99••• abama0m.4mmmrmrm4m 4.m •11111••1••1.11001••••••••*e•9r•*mm!•*m•••e••a•• ••.9me.�0 .• rr*r**}}•..•9..•f0000.9mm9•e••**•99e99m•99mm•••*`ambamam•r4-0-04 0•••90.•••0900.00ee*e!•e*0r000e000mme*o*0***e•fea••ema.al'...*� • u ii••r••0.0.9.0.9.900*e**m*••••..90.0mm••• m4rmammwrmta mrmam •00000e•0•••*.e.••00000000••r•e•••••••9*e.ree•r*0m*1 rr ••1 00•``•00 mee0e***•*er!*ee rfe•••*m**m0*rlefffm•�o o4.00mam•mmmmo •0900900000•a*e•••••r000.000m*•00*0••*e••♦*9 a - See •,9: rot •*e••••090•0••e0m••m*••••••0.0000.0•*m'••••99 •0.00....0 00.0 *00••0.1••••••.9••0000000•r•ee••e!••••0••00 0000•. neer '•• 0009000000*0•*••••.00000090*00000601900000 •0am.040r4m •001000••ee.••••.•9••9.f 4••00000••0••••*11• •0.000 G •a**• • o•ser!!e•••01r0•s0***•9.l990r•m•*m•. 0••••99.0 W0ram4m P. 000000.•••.•••0.0000*r00r•0*0.0*0000*00000* 0000*0 0000* ',• free.0••00m••e••••••9.9000•e4••••0.•r•rm9 •.**aa .r,..... a+" 0.000000.000.0.00.•• 0.... 0000000*0000*.. 000 - •*0e00e0•0e•0**••0*00*•*•0m•••••*•*•••e*0•..*•••..l9•0••e9•.••e*•0.r9.0•9*..9•99r.0••0f••.90e•9•m.r0•••0m•rr*0ff•.••f9••••r0•f•00 •e•0•e*•••*0••.9•-•..•+ 0�e0*.i0+9sy0r:i9;0M00.•*00'•*06*•*•* 0s*•0 e.0}�0 0•9ye •*000.0•** .... 0.0.*ee•o**oe1**•... 0.00090*•0000**1a*.0••••000.•••*a001*•••.0•0•00..66••••0•.*0•0rr0•.*•0••0r.**•9•00*.ea0•••.p.00•*••*9.0.•*•900.009•.e9•9•.�0.•.*9•.••.0•.o.••.fa 00000:000** *00*00.9.0m• ....... r•9••i•0f000fm9*•* Ukiah . *909900 .9*.0a0.••09.•.••0099*•9*.•m0•.••*.m.••i••*.e.9*e0••*.m•9.0•.*.*•9..0*.•**0..0••.•*••e0*.•9m.e099.•••.9e..o!.•...p90.0*0•..e•9*.•.9.f•9*.••0.•0..0••*.0000.•0•.*m0..•..*9•9.•9•.*90•.0.•.*.0•9.*0*.••0.0.••*•0.•99.o•*•.0o..*•.*••*0.r99.•.•9 .0e• SOO* 00 •p• e0 •• • • rm.' " Map Showing Russian River Valley Drainage Areas City of Ukiah Mendocino County, California Warner B nonsiore Cosulting Civil Iingineers, A Corporation Q:\Drawings\Ukiah\ukiah-Petition\dwg\Russian River WS-v2.dwg •••••••••••••• a•99gi,1r..*•4 009•99900.0er•.•*•9i09990••••••••999999•• : ............. Valley .. 6r�9.9*••.1.... •...........................f......... .............. , .r ..1t�R,lX.96**...........009m9••4•••.aa99e99.99m•••••.9.r 000000000*000000000000000000000000 ............. 0000 9.{�:R..9,0*•***•*000000m000000000000000000000eeoo*000• .00000000000• •0. 0.0 N900000 •**0.000000*00100000000*0600000000000• •00000000000• 0000000*00000000000*000000*000000 000* •.f •.e••. .00fvv• r.....000eeo•e•........!•.e..e. . *..0*•00*000000000000*0000*•.•.•9.90•w�♦ }„�,0 *•*0•••0 .•............................ Drainage Areas ..e..a•.•••.••9.0r000000•........... � 0. 0••.00•.? .,...**�....................... ••.•.00••0•••00••••••9.0.900•**•pr•• .r 9.• 0 •00000.000 0a••0009.09••0•..••.00900.990•• 000000.00.9••••.•••••*9000.0009*•0e* _006,.. m••••••9 ** .00009000**•••••099009090.00•• eee•r•r.•9•e000.000**0.0*0.0.09••••0..•9•+ a..•o0*rw 40 o* oeoo*0000e000*e0000...9.•e Tributary 0000.•0000000000009000000**00*00000• 000000,. •*000*000009 000000.000006000000000*0*00 .*000000000••00*000000000000000000000*•9*. 000.000000******0*000009000000600000000 .,.. 000000000 •00000000000*00*00000000000*0000.00. 040000., 00000000* *000000000000000000000000000• Russian River: . 000*0*0*0000000000000*0*0*000000*00000**• •000*000• •.99.999..••••9.90 0000*•00000000000000*000*0000000000.M000.0.000.•....0.•00e99•e••e...to � 0. ' .....•0e••••0••••••.••90090.0e0••••eA•r r 0000000000000000 0000000000*00000000000•w0*00.9••.••00 0099 00.00000 000090000*000000000000000 . Oma• m .._ )0•0*9000090000000*0**00*0.600000000000000*0 000.0000 000000000000000000000000.00 0000000000000000000.000000000099000• 0000•• 0•.90000 •0•••*•••99.099009.0.019• 00000.000*000*000*000000000. 0000*0��:r::::::.::::}}ty}}999::.� aYrma - 100 sq. mi. :000.00000.000000 09 •00000000000000000000*000000000000000000••0 •••.0.000000*00000000000000060000009 .................................. ........ 0000,... 99•*•••.099•l0090*9•••••00r 000.00 .............*..................... ......... 0000.. 9999009.0.9••••••••99••9*m• amarrmmamm 105 sq. mi. •.•9.9.••*ie••9r•99•re990!••**••••• 0000.. 0000. •9.900.9 •.9*••••9.999990m••• .........................*........ .. 0000. .............f..........a.... •...........9....................9G...?:c,.... ...4 ................r.......• omaamam4» p�syrry�a9eR.S�.eg 000*0e00*•00000............................... ... ........................0 r00•*0er0.9000000000000000*00000000000000 0.000.• ••* 000000000*00000000000000• ...0900000••000000000000000000000**•er•00• •0009 90 •00*0000000000000000000• 0009••09r0*m.00000.*00000*00000***•••••9r•9 ......... . 137 sq. mi. •9909 .. ••*..6*000000000666*40• •..•....•....•9.9.9**00000••r•e9.000000.e. 0000• •09 .•r•9rr••o.••r...••00oo ........................................... a,,�........ • ................. ......... . ............................*........... ... x.90. ...r.................... 0.00000.0000*0*000*00*00000000000***00*.•.•• `90 000*0000&00000000900006 Map Showing Russian River Valley Drainage Areas City of Ukiah Mendocino County, California Warner B nonsiore Cosulting Civil Iingineers, A Corporation Q:\Drawings\Ukiah\ukiah-Petition\dwg\Russian River WS-v2.dwg SO 000000000*000000000000000000000000 0** 0000000000000*0 00000L 0000000*00000000000*000000*000000 -,6 0000000006000000000000000*0 00000000000000000 0000 0000000000*000*0000 00000000000000000 000000000 *0.00000000000000*0 0. 00000000000000000 00*000000000000 00000000000 00 00000*0*6 000000000 00.00000 000.00 Map Showing Russian River Valley Drainage Areas City of Ukiah Mendocino County, California Warner B nonsiore Cosulting Civil Iingineers, A Corporation Q:\Drawings\Ukiah\ukiah-Petition\dwg\Russian River WS-v2.dwg '� ��� pllllliuuuu IUllll�u I�V�I�ti��� �� J�'��1�� 11� IIIIIII Illlllliiuuuui� ��, ��� �' � 11116titititi�lu ��n � � (�� u, r�i �� �� ���. i� IIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �r���yn���.,,,,, .. �. ,, ,, �r,�, �,,,,,, ,�,,, �i�� June 9, 2011 86606.00 City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 Attention: Mr. Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works Subject: 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Dear Mr. Eriksen: We are pleased to submit for your use the City of Ukiah 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). The 2010 UWMP document was prepared in accordance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act of 1983 and subsequent amendments, as well as other applicable regulations. The purpose of the UWMP is to maintain efficient use of urban water supplies, continue to promote conservation programs and policies, ensure that sufficient water supplies are available for future beneficial use, and provide a mechanism for response during water drought conditions. The report is organized according to the recommended format established by the California Department of Water Resources as follows: • Chapter 1 — Plan Preparation • Chapter 2 — System Description • Chapter 3 — System Demands • Chapter 4 — System Supplies • Chapter 5 — Water Supply Reliability and Water Shortage Contingency Planning • Chapter 6 — Demand Management Measures • Chapter 7 — Completed UWMP Checklist We would like to extend our thanks to you, Mr. Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works; Mr. Jarod Thiele, Public Works Administrator; Mr. Paul Smith, Water Treatment Plant Supervisor; and other City staff whose courtesy and cooperation were valuable components in completing this study and producing this report. Sincerely, CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC. Tho7AZreci, P.E. Louis J. arella, P.E. Projger Senior ice President TAG/LJC:cjp Enclosures: 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2010 Urban Water Management Plan CONTACT SHEET p p �lilE11, 2011 Date Ian submitted to the Department of Water Resources: ��,I I��la..�a 'A Name of person(s) preparing this plan: Jarod Thiele, Public Works Administration Phone: (707) 463-6755 Fax: (707) 463-6204 Email: ithiele&cityofukiah.com Tommy Greci, Project Manager Carollo Engineers Phone: (559) 436-6616 Fax: (559) 436-1191 Email: tgreci&carollo. com The Water supplier is a: Municipality The Water supplier is a: Retailer Utility services provided by the water supplier include: Water, Sewer Is This Agency a Bureau of Reclamation Contractor? No Is This Agency a State Water Project Contractor? No pw://Carollo/Documents/ClienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Contact Sheet x City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 707.463.6200 2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN June 2011 Prepared By Carollo Engineers, Inc. 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 925.932.1710 �I,d 2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300 • Walnut Creek, California 94598 • PHONE: 925.932.1710 • FAX 925.930.0208 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx City of Ukiah 2010 Urban Water Management Plan IIfe1:3114191;991970k1140k&9 CHAPTER 1 - PLAN PREPARATION 1.1 PURPOSE............................................................................. 1.2 BACKGROUND.................................................................... 1.2.1 Urban Water Management Planning Act .................. 1.2.2 Previous Urban Water Management Plans .............. 1.3 COORDINATION.................................................................. 1.3.1 Data Sources and Previous Reports ........................ 1.4 PLAN ADOPTION, SUBMITTAL, AND IMPLEMENTATION 1.4.1 Plan Adoption............................................................ 1.4.2 Plan Submittal........................................................... 1.4.3 Plan Implementation................................................. 1.5 REPORT ORGANIZATION.................................................. 1.6 CLIMATE CHANGE.............................................................. 1.7 ABBREVIATIONS................................................................. 1.8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................... CHAPTER 2 - SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Page No. ............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................1-2 ...............................1-3 ...............................1-6 ...............................1-7 ...............................1-7 ...............................1-7 ...............................1-8 ...............................1-8 ...............................1-8 ...............................1-8 ...............................1-9 2.1 SERVICE AREA PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION...........................................................2-1 2. 1.1 Service Area Climate....................................................................................2-5 2.2 SERVICE AREA POPULATION...............................................................................2-6 2.3 EXPANSION PROJECTS.........................................................................................2-8 CHAPTER 3 - SYSTEM DEMANDS 3.1 BASELINES AND TARGETS...................................................................................3-1 3.1.1 Baseline Water Use......................................................................................3-1 3.1.2 Target Water Use.........................................................................................3-3 3.1.2.1 Method 1 - Baseline Reduction Method.........................................3-4 3.1.2.2 Method 2 -Efficiency Standard Method.........................................3-5 3.1.2.3 Method 3 - Hydrologic Region Method...........................................3-5 3.1.2.4 Method 4 - BMP Based Method.....................................................3-5 3.1.2.5 Minimum Water Use Reduction Requirement................................3-7 3.1.3 Summary of Baseline and Target Water Use...............................................3-7 3.2 WATER DEMANDS................................................................................................3-10 3.2.1 Historical Water Use...................................................................................3-10 3.2.2 Per Capita Consumption.............................................................................3-12 3.2.3 Water Demand Projections.........................................................................3-15 3.2.3.1 Sales to Other Agencies...............................................................3-16 3.2.3.2 Other Water Demands.................................................................3-18 3.2.3.3 Total Water Demand Projections.................................................3-19 3.2.4 Wholesale Water Demand Projections......................................................3-20 3.2.5 Lower Income Water Demand Projections.................................................3-20 3.3 WATER USE REDUCTION PLAN.........................................................................3-21 June 201 i pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx rel: /e1i9Ell ZE,E&Y&I114T,&*11»1I '? 4.1 WATER SUPPLY SOURCES...................................................................................4-2 4.1.1 Water Supply Facilities.................................................................................4-2 4.1.2 Distribution System and Storage..................................................................4-3 4.1.3 Current and Projected Water Sources.........................................................4-3 4.1.4 Wholesale Supplies......................................................................................4-5 4.2 GROUNDWATER BASIN.........................................................................................4-5 5.1.2.3 Water Quality Factors.....................................................................5-4 4.2.1 Groundwater Basin Description....................................................................4-5 5.1.2.4 Climatic Factors..............................................................................5-4 4.2.2 Groundwater Management Plan...................................................................4-6 4.2.3 Groundwater Levels and Historical Trends..................................................4-6 4.2.4 Groundwater Overdraft.................................................................................4-7 4.3 EXISTING AND PROJECTED GROUNDWATER PUMPING.................................4-7 4.4 TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE OPPORTUNITIES..................................................4-8 4.5 DESALINATED WATER OPPORTUNITIES............................................................4-9 4.6 RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES...............................................................4-10 Consumption Reduction Methods in Most Restrictive Stage .....................5-10 4.6.1 Wastewater Treatment Facilities................................................................4-11 Excessive Use Penalties.............................................................................5-11 4.6.1.1 History of Expansions...................................................................4-12 Revenue and Expenditure Impacts/Measures to Overcome Impacts ........ 5-11 4.6.1.2 Future Expansions.......................................................................4-13 Water Shortage Contingency Ordinance/Resolution.................................5-13 4.6.2 Water Recycling Facilities...........................................................................4-13 Reduction Measuring Mechanism..............................................................5-13 4.6.3 Wastewater Generation..............................................................................4-14 4.6.4 Current Recycled Water Use......................................................................4-15 4.6.5 Projected Recycled Water Use...................................................................4-16 5.4 4.6.6 Encouraging Recycled Water Use..............................................................4-18 5.4.1 4.6.7 Recycled Water Use Optimization Plan......................................................4-19 4.7 FUTURE WATER PROJECTS...............................................................................4-19 CHAPTER 5 - WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY AND WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING 5.1 WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY...............................................................................5-1 5.1.1 Resource Maximization/Import Minimization................................................5-1 5.1.2 Factors Affecting Supply Reliability..............................................................5-2 5.1.2.1 Legal Factors..................................................................................5-3 5.1.2.2 Environmental Factors....................................................................5-3 5.1.2.3 Water Quality Factors.....................................................................5-4 5.1.2.4 Climatic Factors..............................................................................5-4 5.2 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING................................................5-4 5.2.1 Stages of Action and Reduction Objectives.................................................5-5 5.2.1.1 Administration of Water Shortage Program...................................5-7 5.2.2 Actions during a Catastrophic Interruption...................................................5-8 5.2.3 Mandatory Prohibitions on Water Wasting...................................................5-9 5.2.4 Consumption Reduction Methods in Most Restrictive Stage .....................5-10 5.2.5 Excessive Use Penalties.............................................................................5-11 5.2.6 Revenue and Expenditure Impacts/Measures to Overcome Impacts ........ 5-11 5.2.7 Water Shortage Contingency Ordinance/Resolution.................................5-13 5.2.8 Reduction Measuring Mechanism..............................................................5-13 5.3 WATER QUALITY..................................................................................................5-13 5.3.1 Improvement Projects.................................................................................5-13 5.3.2 Water Quality Impacts Summary ................................................................5-13 5.4 DROUGHT PLANNING..........................................................................................5-14 5.4.1 Basis of Water Year Data...........................................................................5-15 5.4.2 Supply Reliability - Historic and Current Conditions...................................5-15 June 2011 ii pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx 5.4.3 Projected Normal Year Supply/Demand.....................................................5-16 5.4.4 Projected Single Dry Year Supply/Demand................................................5-17 5.4.5 Projected Multiple Dry Year Supply/Demand.............................................5-17 CHAPTER 6 - DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES 6.1 DMM 1 - WATER SURVEY PROGRAMS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY June 2011 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS ......................6-2 6.1.1 Implementation Status..................................................................................6-2 6.1.2 Cost Benefit Analysis....................................................................................6-2 6.1.3 Economic/Non-Economic Factors................................................................6-4 6.1.4 Legal Authority..............................................................................................6-4 6.2 DMM 2 - RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING RETROFIT....................................................6-4 6.2.1 Implementation Status..................................................................................6-5 6.2.2 Cost Benefit Analysis....................................................................................6-5 6.2.3 Economic/Non-Economic Factors................................................................6-5 6.2.4 Legal Authority..............................................................................................6-5 6.3 DMM 3 - SYSTEM WATER AUDITS, LEAK DETECTION, AND REPAIR..............6-6 6.3.1 Implementation Status..................................................................................6-6 6.3.2 Steps Necessary to Implement.....................................................................6-6 6.3.3 Implementation Schedule.............................................................................6-6 6.3.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness...............................................6-7 6.4 DMM 4 - METERING WITH COMMODITY RATES FOR ALL NEW CONNECTIONS AND RETROFIT OF EXISTING CONNECTIONS .......................6-7 6.4.1 Implementation Status..................................................................................6-7 6.4.2 Steps Necessary to Implement.....................................................................6-7 6.4.3 Implementation Schedule.............................................................................6-7 6.4.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness...............................................6-7 6.5 DMM 5 - LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION PROGRAMS AND INCENTIVES.............................................................................................................6-8 6.5.1 Implementation Status..................................................................................6-8 6.5.2 Steps Necessary to Implement.....................................................................6-9 6.5.3 Implementation Schedule.............................................................................6-9 6.5.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness...............................................6-9 6.6 DMM 6 - HIGH -EFFICIENCY WASHING MACHINE REBATE PROGRAM ............ 6-9 6.6.1 Implementation Status..................................................................................6-9 6.6.2 Cost Benefit Analysis....................................................................................6-9 6.6.3 Economic/Non-Economic Factors..............................................................6-10 6.6.4 Legal Authority............................................................................................6-10 6.7 DMM 7 - PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAMS....................................................6-10 6.7.1 Implementation Status................................................................................6-10 6.7.2 Steps Necessary to Implement...................................................................6-11 6.7.3 Implementation Schedule...........................................................................6-11 6.7.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness.............................................6-11 6.8 DMM 8 - SCHOOL EDUCATION PROGRAM........................................................6-11 6.8.1 Implementation Status................................................................................6-11 6.8.2 Steps Necessary to Implement...................................................................6-11 6.8.3 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness.............................................6-11 6.9 DMM 9 - CONSERVATION PROGRAMS FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTS.......................................................................6-12 6.9.1 Implementation Status................................................................................6-12 6.9.2 Steps Necessary to Implement...................................................................6-12 June 2011 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx CHAPTER 7 - COMPLETED UWMP CHECKLIST 7.1 UWMP CHECKLIST.................................................................................................7-1 Appendix A Outreach Documents and Coordination with Relevant Agencies Appendix B 6.9.3 Implementation Schedule...........................................................................6-12 Technical Memorandum on Water Supply, Rights, and Reliability 6.9.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness.............................................6-12 Resolution to Adopt the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 6.10 DMM 10 -WHOLESALE AGENCY PROGRAMS..................................................6-12 Water Shortage Emergency Plan 6.11 DMM 11 -CONSERVATION PRICING..................................................................6-12 2009 Annual Water Quality Report Appendix I 6.11.1 Implementation Status................................................................................6-12 6.11.2 Steps Necessary to Implement...................................................................6-13 6.11.3 Implementation Schedule...........................................................................6-13 6.11.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness.............................................6-13 6.12 DMM 12 - WATER CONSERVATION COORDINATOR.......................................6-13 6.12.1 Implementation Status................................................................................6-13 6.12.2 Steps Necessary to Implement...................................................................6-13 6.12.3 Implementation Schedule...........................................................................6-13 6.12.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness.............................................6-14 6.13 DMM 13 - WATER WASTE PROHIBITION...........................................................6-14 6.13.1 Implementation Status................................................................................6-14 6.13.2 Steps Necessary to Implement...................................................................6-14 6.13.3 Implementation Schedule...........................................................................6-14 6.13.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness.............................................6-14 6.14 DMM 14 - RESIDENTIAL ULTRA LOW FLUSH TOILET REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS...........................................................................................................6-14 6.14.1 Implementation Status................................................................................6-14 6.14.2 Steps Necessary to Implement...................................................................6-15 6.14.3 Implementation Schedule...........................................................................6-15 6.14.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness.............................................6-15 6.14.5 Cost Benefit Analysis for Expansion of Program........................................6-15 6.15 EXISTING CONSERVATION SAVINGS................................................................6-16 6.16 PLANNED WATER SUPPLIES..............................................................................6-16 CHAPTER 7 - COMPLETED UWMP CHECKLIST 7.1 UWMP CHECKLIST.................................................................................................7-1 Appendix A Outreach Documents and Coordination with Relevant Agencies Appendix B Notice of Public Review of 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Appendix C Technical Memorandum on Water Supply, Rights, and Reliability (Wagner and Bonsignore) Appendix D Resolution to Adopt the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Appendix E Verification of Plan Submittal Appendix F Water Shortage Emergency Plan Appendix G Resolution No. 2009-17, Stage I Water Emergency Appendix H 2009 Annual Water Quality Report Appendix I Economic Analysis of Demand Management Measures 1, 2, 6, and 14 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Coordination with Appropriate Agencies (Guidebook Table 1) ....................1-4 Table2.1 Climate..........................................................................................................2-5 Table 2.2 Population - Current and Projected (Guidebook Table 2) ............................2-7 June 2011 iv pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx Table 3.1 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use: 10 to 15 -Year Range (Guidebook Table 4.1 Table13).......................................................................................................3-2 Table 3.2 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use: 10 -Year Range (Guidebook Table Table 4.3 Wholesale Supplies - Existing and Planned Sources of Water 14).................................................................................................................3-3 Table 3.3 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use: 5 -Year Range (Guidebook Table 15) ...3-4 Table 4.4 Table 3.4 Method 4 Target Determination Summary ...................................................3-9 Table 4.5 Table 3.5 Baseline and Target Water Use Summary .................................................3-10 Table 4.6 Table 3.6 Historic Monthly Water Production (1995 - 2010) ......................................3-11 Table 4.7 Table 3.7 Water Deliveries - Actual, 2005 (Guidebook Table 3) ...............................3-12 Table 4.8 Table 3.8 Water Deliveries - Actual, 2010 (Guidebook Table 4) ...............................3-13 Table 4.9 Table 3.9 Projected Water Demands.........................................................................3-15 Table 4.10 Table 3.10 Water Deliveries - Projected, 2015 (Guidebook Table 5) ..........................3-17 Water Quality - Current and Projected Water Supply Impacts Table 3.11 Water Deliveries - Projected, 2020 (Guidebook Table 6) ..........................3-17 Table 4.11 Table 3.12 Water Deliveries - Projected 2025, 2030, 2035 (Guidebook Table 7) ......3-18 Table 3.13 Sales to Other Water Agencies (Guidebook Table 9) ................................3-18 Table 4.12 Table 3.14 Additional Water Uses and Losses (Guidebook Table 10) ........................3-19 Table 3.15 Total Water Use (Guidebook Table 11) ......................................................3-20 Table 4.13 Table 3.16 Retail Agency Demand Projections Provided to Wholesale Suppliers Table 4.14 Methods to Encourage Recycled Water Use (Guidebook Table 25) .........4-19 (Guidebook Table 12).................................................................................3-21 Table 4.15 Table 3.17 Low Income Projected Water Demands (Guidebook Table 8) ..................3-21 Table 4.1 Water Supply Sources..................................................................................4-2 Table 4.2 Water Supplies - Current and Projected (Guidebook Table 16) ..................4-4 Table 4.3 Wholesale Supplies - Existing and Planned Sources of Water Catastrophe Actions Discussed in City Municipal Code...............................5-9 (Guidebook Table 17)...................................................................................4-5 Table 4.4 Historic Groundwater Pumping (Guidebook Table 18) ................................4-7 Table 4.5 Projected Groundwater Pumping (Guidebook Table 19) .............................4-8 Table 5.5 Table 4.6 Transfer and Exchange Opportunities (Guidebook Table 20) .....................4-9 Table 4.7 Opportunities for Desalinated Water..........................................................4-10 Table 5.6 Table 4.8 Treatment Capacities for UWWTP.............................................................4-11 Table 4.9 Major Components of UWWTP Facilities...................................................4-12 Table 5.7 Table 4.10 Recycled Water - Wastewater Collection and Treatment (Guidebook Table 5.8 Water Quality - Current and Projected Water Supply Impacts Table21).....................................................................................................4-15 June 2011 Table 4.11 Recycled Water - Non -Recycled Wastewater Disposal (Guidebook pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx Table22).....................................................................................................4-15 Table 4.12 2010 Recycled Water Use Compared to 2005 UWMP Use Projections (Guidebook Table 24).................................................................................4-16 Table 4.13 Recycled Water- Potential Future Use (Guidebook Table 23) .................4-17 Table 4.14 Methods to Encourage Recycled Water Use (Guidebook Table 25) .........4-19 Table 4.15 Future Water Supply Projects (Guidebook Table 26) ................................4-21 Table 5.1 Factors Resulting in Inconsistency of Supply (Guidebook Table 29) ........... 5-2 Table 5.2 Water Shortage Contingency - Rationing Stages (Guidebook Table 35) ....5-6 Table 5.3 Catastrophe Actions Discussed in City Municipal Code...............................5-9 Table 5.4 Water Shortage Contingency - Mandatory Prohibitions (Guidebook Table36).....................................................................................................5-10 Table 5.5 Water Shortage Contingency - Consumption Reduction Methods (Guidebook Table 37).................................................................................5-12 Table 5.6 Water Shortage Contingency - Penalties and Charges (Guidebook Table38).....................................................................................................5-12 Table 5.7 Proposed Measures to Overcome Revenue Impacts................................5-12 Table 5.8 Water Quality - Current and Projected Water Supply Impacts June 2011 v pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx Table 6.1 (Guidebook Table 30).................................................................................5-14 .................................................................6-3 Table 5.9 Basis of Water Year Data (Guidebook Table 27) .......................................5-15 Table 6.3 Table 5.10 Supply Reliability - Historical Conditions (Guidebook Table 28) ................5-16 Proposed Water Rate Schedule...................................................................6-8 Table 5.11 Supply Reliability - Current Water Source (Guidebook Table 31) ..............5-16 Table 6.6 Table 5.12 Supply and Demand Comparison - Normal Year (Guidebook Table 32)...5-17 AWT Table 5.13 Supply and Demand Comparison - Single Dry Year (Guidebook Average Wet Weather Flow Basin Table33).....................................................................................................5-17 Table 5.14 Supply and Demand Comparison - Multiple Dry Year Events (Guidebook Table 34).................................................................................5-18 Table 6.1 Demand Management Measures .................................................................6-3 Table 6.2 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 1......................................................................6-4 Table 6.3 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 2......................................................................6-5 Table 6.4 Proposed Water Rate Schedule...................................................................6-8 Table 6.5 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 6....................................................................6-10 Table 6.6 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 14..................................................................6-15 Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic.......................................7-2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 City of Ukiah..................................................................................................2-2 Figure 2.2 Sphere of Influence.......................................................................................2-4 Figure2.3 Climograph....................................................................................................2-6 Figure 2.4 Historical and Projected Population..............................................................2-7 Figure 3.1 Historical Water Use and Baselines.............................................................3-4 Figure 3.2 Method 4 Target Water Use Calculation Procedure....................................3-8 Figure 3.3 2010 Water Use by Customer Type...........................................................3-13 Figure 3.4 Projected Per Capita Water Use................................................................3-14 Figure 3.5 Projected Water Demands.........................................................................3-16 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation Definition °F Degrees Fahrenheit AB State Assembly Bill Act Urban Water Management Planning Act ADWF Average Dry Weather Flow AF acre-feet AFY acre-feet per year AWT Advanced Wastewater Treatment AWWF Average Wet Weather Flow Basin Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin June 2011 vi pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx Abbreviation Definition BMPs Best Management Practices Bulletin 118 California's Groundwater: Bulletin 118, prepared by the Department of Water Resources CCR California Code of Regulations CFS cubic feet per second CII Commercial, Industrial, Institutional CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System City City of Ukiah Contingency Plan Urban Water Shortage Contingency Plan County Mendocino County CUWCC California Urban Water Conservation Council DMM Demand Management Measure DOF California Department of Finance DPH California Department of Public Health DWR California Department of Water Resources EDU Equivalent Dwelling Unit EIR environmental impact report EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ETo Evapotranspiration gpcd gallons per capita per day GPD gallons per day GPM gallons per minute Guidebook DWR Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan GWMP Groundwater Management Plan GWR Groundwater Rule LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MFR multi -family residential MG million gallons MGD million gallons per day MHI Medium Household Income June 2011 vii pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx Abbreviation Definition MOU Memorandum of Understanding MSL mean sea level Notification Plan Water Quality Emergency Notification Plan NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Plan Urban Water Management Plan PWWF Peak Wet Weather Flow RWMP Recycled Water Master Plan RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SBx7-7 Water Conservation Act of 2009 SFR single-family residential SOI Sphere of Influence State Water Board California State Water Resources Control Board ULFT Ultra Low Flush Toilet USGS U.S. Geological Survey USGS Investigative Report Water Resources Investigation Report 85-4258 on Groundwater Resources in Mendocino County (1986) UVSD Ukiah Valley Sanitation District UWMP Urban Water Management Plan UWMPA Urban Water Management Planning Act UWWTP Ukiah Waste Water Treatment Plant WTP Water Treatment Plant DWR TABLE INDEX 1 Coordination with Appropriate Agencies 2 Population - Current and Projected 3 Water Deliveries - Actual, 2005 4 Water Deliveries - Actual, 2010 5 Water Deliveries - Projected, 2015 6 Water Deliveries - Projected, 2020 7 Water Deliveries - Projected 2025, 2030, and 2035 8 Low -Income Projected Water Demands 9 Sales to Other Water Agencies 10 Additional Water Uses and Losses June 2011 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx IC - e • r&F.17C3k1ra 1.1 2.3 3.7 3.8 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.17 3.13 3.14 viii DWR Table DWR Name Report Table No. 11 Total Water Use 3.15 12 Retail Agency Demand Projections Provided to 3.16 Wholesale Suppliers 13 Base Period Ranges 3.1 14 Base Daily per Capita Water Use, 10- to 15 -Year 3.2 Range 15 Base Daily per Capita Water Use, 5 -Year Range 3.3 16 Water Supplies - Current and Projected 4.2 17 Wholesale Supplies - Existing and Planned Sources 4.3 of Water 18 Groundwater - Volume Pumped 4.4 19 Groundwater - Volume Projected to be Pumped 4.5 20 Transfer and Exchange Opportunities 4.6 21 Recycled Water - Wastewater Collection and 4.10 Treatment 22 Recycled Water - Non -Recycled Wastewater Disposal 4.11 23 Recycled Water - Potential Future Use 4.13 24 Recycled Water - 2005 UWMP Use Projection 4.12 Compared to 2010 Actual 25 Methods to Encourage Recycled Water Use 4.14 26 Future Water Supply Projects 4.15 27 Basis of Water Year Data 5.9 28 Supply Reliability - Historic Conditions 5.10 29 Factors Resulting in Inconsistency of Supply 5.1 30 Water Quality - Current and Projected Water Supply 5.8 Impacts 31 Supply Reliability - Current Water Sources 5.11 32 Supply and Demand Comparison - Normal Year 5.12 33 Supply and Demand Comparison - Single Dry Year 5.13 34 Supply and Demand Comparison - Multiple Dry Year 5.14 Events 35 Water Shortage Contingency - Rationing Stages to 5.2 Address Water Supply Shortages 36 Water Shortage Contingency - Mandatory Prohibitions 5.4 37 Water Shortage Contingency - Consumption 5.5 Reduction Methods 38 Water Shortage Contingency - Penalties and Charges 5.6 June 2011 ix pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/TOC.docx Chapter 1 PLAN PREPARATION 1.1 PURPOSE The California Water Code requires urban water suppliers within the state to prepare and adopt Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) for submission to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The UWMPs, which are required to be filed every five years, must satisfy the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) of 1983 including amendments that have been made to the Act and other applicable regulations. The UWMPA requires urban water suppliers servicing 3,000 or more connections, or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet (AF) of water annually, to prepare an UWMP. The purpose of the UWMP is for water suppliers to evaluate their long-term resource planning and establish management measures to ensure adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future demands. The UWMP provides a framework to help water suppliers maintain efficient use of urban water supplies, continue to promote conservation programs and policies, ensure that sufficient water supplies are available for future beneficial use, and provide a mechanism for response during water drought conditions. This report, which was prepared in compliance with the California Water Code, and as set forth in the 2010 guidelines and format established by the DWR, constitutes the City of Ukiah (City) 2010 UWMP. The City did not participate in an area, regional, watershed, or basin -wide UWMP. e�i11IDi 1.2.1 Urban Water Management Planning Act In 1983, State Assembly Bill (AB) 797 modified the California Water Code Division 6 by creating the UWMPA. Several amendments to the original UWMPA, which were also introduced in 1983, increased the data requirements and planning elements to be included in the 2005 and 2010 UWMPs. Initial amendments to the UWMPA required that total projected water use be compared to water supply sources over the next 20 years, in 5 -year increments. Recent DWR guidelines recommend projecting through a 25 -year planning horizon to maintain a 20 -year timeframe until the next UWMP update has been completed. Other amendments require that UWMPs include provisions for recycled water use, demand management measures, and a water shortage contingency plan. The UWMPA requires inclusion of water supply reliability and water shortage contingency planning, which meets the specifications set forth therein. Analysis of recycled water use was June 2011 1-1 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch01 added in the reporting requirements and figures prominently in the evaluation of future and alternative water supplies. Each water supplier must describe their water demand management measures that are being implemented or that are scheduled for implementation. Each urban water purveyor must coordinate the preparation of the water shortage contingency plan with other urban water purveyors in the area, to the extent practicable. In addition to the UWMPA and its amendments, there are several other regulations that are related to the content of the UWMP. In summary, the relevant regulations are: AB 1420: Requires implementation of demand management measures (DMMs)/best management practices (BMPs) and meeting the 20x2020 targets to qualify for water management grants or loans. AB 1465: Requires water suppliers to describe opportunities related to recycled water use and stormwater recapture to offset potable water use. Amendments Senate Bill (SB) 610 (Costa, 2001), and AB 901 (Daucher, 2001): Effective beginning January 1, 2002, require counties and cities to consider information relating to the availability of water to supply new large developments by mandating the preparation of further water supply planning (Daucher) and Water Supply Assessments (Costa). • SB 1087: Requires water suppliers to report single-family residential (SFR) and multi -family residential (MFR) projected water use for lower income areas separately. • Amendment SB 318 (Alpert, 2004): Requires the UWMP to describe the opportunities for development of desalinated water, including but not limited to, ocean water, brackish water, and groundwater, as long-term supply. • AB 105 (Wiggins, 2004): Requires urban water suppliers to submit their UWMPs to the California State Library. • SBx7-7: Requires development and use of new methodologies for reporting population growth estimates, base per capita use, and water conservation. This water bill also extended the 2010 UWMP submittal deadline for retail agencies to July 1, 2011. As of the date of this report, DWR is still finalizing two of the four new methodologies that an agency can choose from to establish their intermediate (2015) and year 2020 water conservation targets. SB 1478: This bill extends the 2010 UWMP deadline for wholesale agencies to July 1, 2011, as SBx7-7 did for retail agencies. 1.2.2 Previous Urban Water Management Plans Pursuant to the UWMPA, the City previously prepared an UWMP in 2005, which was approved and adopted on November 26, 2007. Following adoption, the 2005 UWMP was June 2011 1-2 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch01 submitted to and considered complete by DWR. The City also prepared an UWMP in 2002, fulfilling the 2000 UWMP requirements. This 2010 UWMP report serves as an update to the 2005 UWMP and draws substantially from that document. 1.3 COORDINATION The UWMPA requires that the UWMP identify the agencies with which the City coordinated in the planning, discussion, and preparation of the UWMP. In addition, documentation is required to provide assurance that appropriate public notification deadlines and submission requirements are met. Law 10620 (d) (2). Each urban water supplier shall coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other water suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable. 10621 (b). Every urban water supplier required to prepare a plan pursuant to this part shall, at least 60 days prior to the public hearing on the plan required by Section 10642, notify any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan. The urban water supplier may consult with, and obtain comments from, any city or county that receives notice pursuant to this subdivision. 10635 (b). The urban water supplier shall provide that portion of its urban water management plan prepared pursuant to this article to any city or county within which it provides water supplies no later than 60 days after the submission of its urban water management plan. 10642. Each urban water supplier shall encourage the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of the plan. 10642. Prior to adopting a plan, the urban water supplier shall make the plan available for public inspection and shall hold a public hearing thereon. Prior to the hearing, notice of the time and place of hearing shall be published within the jurisdiction of the publicly owned water supplier pursuant to Section 6066 of the Government Code. The urban water supplier shall provide notice of the time and place of hearing to any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies. A privately owned water supplier shall provide an equivalent notice within its service area. While preparing the 2010 UWMP, the City coordinated its efforts with relevant agencies to ensure that the data and issues are presented accurately. Table 1.1 summarizes the external outreach conducted during UWMP preparation. Appendix A contains copies of outreach documents. June 2011 1-3 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch01 C- CD N O Table 1.1 Coordination with Appropriate Agencies (Guidebook Table 1) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Participated Was Was Sent a in Attended Contacted Was Sent a Notice of Not Involved Coordinating Developing Commented Public for Copy of the Intention to /No Agencies the Plan on the Draft Meetings Assistance Draft Plan Adopt Information DWR X X X City of Ukiah X X X X X X General Public X X Civic Center Lobby City's Website Mendocino County X X Planning & Building Services Local Agency X X X X Formation Commission Redwood Valley X X County Water District Willow County Water X X District Millview County Water X X District Calpella County Water X X District Rogina Water X X Company Ukiah Chamber of X X Commerce C- CD N O cs Table 1.1 Coordination with Appropriate Agencies (Guidebook Table 1) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Participated Was Was Sent a in Attended Contacted Was Sent a Notice of Not Involved Coordinating Developing Commented Public for Copy of the Intention to /No Agencies the Plan on the Draft Meetings Assistance Draft Plan Adopt Information Mendocino X X Environmental Center Mendocino County X X X X Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District Mendocino County X X Water Agency Sonoma County Water X X Agency California Water Impact X X Network Notes: 1. "Guidebook Table V refers to a specific table in the "Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan" by DWR. The City also provided formal written notification to Mendocino County that the City's UWMP was being updated for 2010. In accordance with the UWMPA, this notification was provided to Mendocino County at least 60 days prior to the public hearing of the plan. Copies of the final UWMP will be provided to Mendocino County no later than 30 days after its submission to DWR. The City is committed to encouraging the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of its citizenry. From June 1 to June 15, 2011, the City placed a notice in the local newspaper stating that its UWMP was being updated and that a public hearing would be conducted to address comments and concerns from members of the community. The notice stated that a public review period would be scheduled from June 1 to June 15, 2011. A copy of this notification is included in Appendix B. The Draft 2010 UWMP was made available for public inspection at the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah. In addition, the City also posted a copy of the public review draft UWMP on its website.' The City held a workshop on June 8, 2010 in the Ukiah Valley Conference Center, located at 200 South School Street; Ukiah, CA 95482. The workshop provided an opportunity for the City's customers, residents, and employees to learn and ask questions about the current and future water supply of the City. 1.3.1 Data Sources and Previous Reports This UWMP was prepared by compiling data from a variety of sources, including federal, state, and local government agencies. In addition, existing documents concerning water management in Ukiah and surrounding areas were used. The following documents were utilized in the development of this UWMP: • Urban Water Management Plan, City of Ukiah, 2005 • General Plan Update, City of Ukiah, 1995 (revised 2004) • General Plan, Mendocino County, 2010 • Regional Housing Needs Plan, Mendocino County, 2008 • Ukiah Valley Area Plan Water Supply Assessment, 2010 • California Water Plan, Bulletin 160-09, Department of Water Resources, Update 2009 This UWMP was prepared by Carollo Engineers, Inc. with assistance from Wagner and Bonsignore, a consulting firm that specializes in water rights issues. The work performed 1 www.cityofukiah.com June 2011 1-6 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch01 by Wagner and Bonsignore has been incorporated in to the various sections of this UWMP, and is included as a technical memorandum in Appendix C. 1.4 PLAN ADOPTION, SUBMITTAL, AND IMPLEMENTATION Pursuant to the requirements of the UWMPA, this section summarizes the adoption, submittal, and implementation of the City's 2010 UWMP. Law 10621 (c). The amendments to, or changes in, the plan shall be adopted and filed in the manner set forth in Article 3 (commencing with Section 10640) 10642. After the hearing, the plan shall be adopted as prepared or as modified after the hearing. 10643. An urban water supplier shall implement its plan adopted pursuant to this chapter in accordance with the schedule set forth in its plan. 10644 (a). An urban water supplier shall submit to the department, the California State Library, and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies a copy of its plan no later than 30 days after adoption. Copies of amendments or changes to the plans shall be submitted to the department, the California State Library, and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies within 30 days after adoption. 10645. Not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its plan with the department, the urban water supplier, and the department shall make the plan available for public review during normal business hours. 1.4.1 Plan Adoption The City prepared the 2010 UWMP during the spring and summer of 2011. The plan was updated after the public workshop and adopted by its City Council on June 15, 1010. A copy of the adopting resolution is provided in Appendix D. 1.4.2 Plan Submittal The City submitted the UWMP to the DWR on [DATE]. Within 30 days of submitting the UWMP to DWR, the adopted UWMP was made available for public review during normal business hours at the locations specified for the viewing of the Draft 2010 UWMP, submitted to the California State Library, and submitted to Mendocino County. Appendix E provides verification that the adopted UWMP was submitted to the agencies listed above within the required timeline. If major changes are made to this 2010 UWMP after adoption by the City, the City will hold an additional public hearing and the City Council will readopt the plan. June 2011 1-7 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch01 1.4.3 Plan Implementation As part of this UWMP, the City intends to implement on-going and future action items. Timelines for the anticipated implementation schedule of specific activities/programs are presented in the body of the report as the activities and programs are discussed. 1.5 REPORT ORGANIZATION This report is organized according to the recommended format by the DWR's Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (Guidebook). The UWMP contains seven chapters, followed by appendices that provide supporting documentation for the information presented herein. The chapters are as follows: • Chapter 1 — Plan Preparation • Chapter 2 — System Description • Chapter 3 — System Demands • Chapter 4 — System Supplies • Chapter 5 — Water Supply Reliability and Water Shortage Contingency Planning • Chapter 6 — Demand Management Measures • Chapter 7 — Completed Urban Water Management Plan Checklist Additionally, the chapters are preceded by an UWMP Contact Sheet. 1.6 CLIMATE CHANGE DWR guidelines suggest that urban water suppliers consider the potential effects related to climate change in their 2010 UWM Ps. However, there are currently no specific climate change requirements in the UWMPA or in the Water Conservation Bill of 2009. Therefore, it is left to each supplier's discretion as to whether or not to account for the potential effects of climate change in their 2010 UWMP. For the purposes of this 2010 UWMP, the City has opted not to include information or analysis related to climate change. If there are specific requirements for addressing climate change in UWMPs in the future, the City will incorporate these in their 2015 IATA81 To conserve space and improve readability, this report includes many abbreviations. The abbreviations are spelled out in the text the first time they are used and are subsequently June 2011 1-8 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch01 identified by abbreviation only. A summary of the abbreviations used in this report is provided in the report Table of Contents. 1.8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Carollo Engineers wishes to acknowledge and thank the following City Staff: Tim Eriksen Public Works Director Jarod Thiele Public Works Administration Paul Smith Water Treatment Plant Supervisor Their cooperation and courtesy in obtaining a variety of necessary information were valuable components in completing and producing this report. The following staff of Carollo Engineers was primarily involved in the preparation of this plan: Lou Carella, P.E. Tommy Greci, P.E. Paul Friedlander, P.E. Ryan Orgill, P.E. Maggie Herzog, E.I.T. Debra Dunn Principal -in -Charge Project Manager Quality Service Manager Project Engineer Staff Engineer GIS/Graphics June 2011 1-9 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch01 Chapter 2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) requires that the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) include a description of the water purveyor's service area and various aspects of the area served including climate, population, and other demographic factors. Law 10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following: 10631. (a). Describe the service area of the supplier, including current and projected population, climate, and other demographic factors affecting the supplier's water management planning. The projected population estimates shall be based upon data from the state, regional, or local service agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier and shall be in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. 2.1 SERVICE AREA PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The City of Ukiah (City) is located in Mendocino County in the northern coastal region of California (Figure 2.1). The City is situated in the Yokayo Valley approximately 60 miles north of Santa Rosa, 20 miles south of Willits, and 5 miles south-west of Lake Mendocino, and is surrounded by coastal ranges in southern Mendocino County. The valley is bordered on the west by the Mendocino Range and on the east by the Mayacamas Mountains. Elevations in the nearby mountains reach over 1,800 feet above mean sea level (MSL), while elevations in the valley range from about 560 feet above MSL in the south near EI Robles Ranch to 670 feet above MSL in the north near Calpella. Interstate Highway 101 runs north to south through the City along its eastern boundary. The Russian River flows from north to south through the Ukiah area. Ukiah is the county seat for Mendocino County. Originally part of a Mexican Land Grant, the City began its history as a valley settlement in 1856. Lumber production became a major industry by the end of the 1940s because of the City's moderate climate and productive soil; currently, agriculture is the largest industry in Ukiah and the rest of Mendocino County'. Ukiah is home to wineries, grape vineyards, pear orchards, and wood production plants, in addition to up-and-coming non-agricultural manufacturers. ' www.cityofukiah.com June 2011 2-1 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch02 stony George Reservoir fort Bragg Willows I I Its Lake Pillsbury Mendocino East Park 101 Reservoir e Me Ukiah U per Lake -° Nice Talmage North L port .Lucerne Williams Pacific Ocean Lakepo ar Lake Clearlake Oaks Kelseyville��� Point Arena learlake Lower Lake ' loverdale Cobb Hidden Valley Lake Mi own iealdsburg Lake Calistoga Berryessa Santa Rosa Legend Figure 2.1 City of Ukiah Urban Areas 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Hydrography City of Ukiah Ukiah; Major Roads State of California 0 Miles 7.5 15 The City's General Plan, adopted in December 1995 and revised in 2004, identifies boundaries associated with two planning areas: the incorporated area within the City limits and the unincorporated area, which is a combination of the Sphere of Influence (SOI) and additional Planning Area. The City limits include the land currently within the City of Ukiah. The City's SOI (Figure 2.2) represents the land limits to which the City may extend its services and project its growth over the next 20 years. The SOI must be adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) if the City wants to consider annexing land area. For comprehensive policy planning, the City's General Plan also incorporates an additional Planning Area study, which encompasses the surrounding Ukiah Valley and includes the City of Ukiah. The Planning Area includes land area which is unlikely to be annexed by the City within the next 20 years.2 Although the City provides water service to a few connections outside the city limits (within the Brush Street Triangle) this UWMP assumes that the City's current and future water system will not extend beyond the boundaries of the SOI described in the General Plan. The City's SOI comprises approximately 9.55 square miles (6,112 acres). Based on the original 1995 General Plan estimates, the City will reach buildout by 2015. As the City annexes land area in the SOI over the next 20 years, the water service area and population of the City will expand. Service area population growth is projected and discussed in Section 2.2 of this report. Three water purveyors surround the City: (1) the Millview County Water District to the north, (2) the Rogina Water Company to the east, and (3) the Willow County Water District to the south. However, the City is the largest public water service provider in the Ukiah Valley, providing roughly half of the valley's public water supply.3 The City provides water to businesses and residences within its City limits. The aforementioned water districts serve the unincorporated areas surrounding the City. Property owners without access to the City or one of the district systems obtain water from individual wells or springs.4 The incorporated area of the City is governed by a five -person City Council in a Council - Mayor -Manager form of government. The Mayor is selected by the City Council each year from the five member Council. General administration and day-to-day operations are directed by the City Manager who is appointed by the Council. The City is a general law municipality, governed by the State of California in conjunction with its local ordinances. 2 City of Ukiah General Plan (1995, revised 2004). 3 Ukiah Valley Area Plan (2010). 4 City of Ukiah General Plan (1995, revised 2004). June 2011 2-3 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch02 so Masonite ruck J i{. erwood Dr De y 101 hovers Ln ¢ r' ,, ay!" d 1 IS �,� F! ,. m...,...�.,...� o ... 1 IoW D p 1 1 �Brh St � rba ..... ,.,.,.... ,� d,�� so15-3 I(' �1 �. jr ..... , �.. �� 1———--- Iil m � 1 10 L has �u .. In Ave 1 �1 4 n � 0 0 m II r � hCL i ....*°...,.. ... 101 1 v Ir ¢p } «r N Figure 2.2 Legend Sphere of Influence 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Streets f �I City Limits City of Ukiah Sphere of Influence Feet 0 2,000 4,000 �� 2.1.1 Service Area Climate The climate in the City can be classified as coastal with average rainfall rates of about 35.2 inches per year. Most of the annual precipitation occurs during the period from November through April. Table 2.1 summarizes monthly average reference evapotranspiration (ETo) rates, rainfall, and temperature. The average monthly precipitation and average monthly temperatures are also shown on Figure 2.3. Table 2.1 Climate 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Avera a Average Average Min. Average Max. Average ETo( Rainfa11(2) Temperature (2) Temperature (2) Temperature (2) Month (inches) (inches) (°F) (°F) (°F) January 0.98 5.38 36.0 56.4 46.2 February 1.58 5.70 37.7 60.1 48.9 March 3.02 3.72 40.0 65.8 52.9 April 4.64 2.97 41.5 66.9 54.2 May 5.98 0.83 47.0 78.9 63.0 June 7.00 0.30 51.6 84.9 68.3 July 7.98 0.02 56.4 93.9 75.2 August 7.03 0.00 54.1 92.2 73.2 September 5.18 0.12 49.6 87.8 68.7 October 3.36 1.14 43.9 77.4 60.7 November 1.42 3.97 40.1 63.6 51.9 December 0.92 11.08 37.2 55.4 46.3 Annual 49.09 35.23 44.6 73.6 59.1 Notes: 1. Source: California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), Station No. 85: Hopland FS (period of record 1989-2010). 2. Source: Western Regional Climate Center, Station: Ukiah Municipal Airport (period of record 2001-2008). The average annual temperature is 59.1 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). The City typically has warm daytime temperatures and cool nighttime temperatures. The City does not experience extreme seasonal temperatures. June 2011 2-5 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch02 The relative humidity in the City averaged 85 percent in January 2010 while the July 2010 relative humidity averaged 56 percent. Wind direction is variable and wind speed averages less than 4 miles per hour. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Average Precipitation Average Min. Temperature ( F) —Average Max. Temperature ( F) 2.2 SERVICE AREA POPULATION 12.0 10.0 8.0 p E c 6.0 R c 4.0 2.0 0.0 Climograph 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah := CPQ , The incorporated City of Ukiah has a population of approximately 15,612 as of January 1, 201 05 , and represents approximately 18 percent of Mendocino County. The median annual growth rate between 1995 and 2010 was approximately 0.4 percent, although the City has experienced a net decrease from its 2003 population of 15,942. The City population increased between 2009 and 2010 by 0.1 percent. Population projections, shown in Table 2.2 and Figure 2.4 were used to forecast water requirements for the City. Historical population statistics shown on Figure 2.4 are from California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates. The General Plan proposes an SOI which represents the ultimate limits to which the City will extend its services over the next 20 years. The most recent population projection for the City of Ukiah was included in the 2010 Mendocino County General Plan, in which the annual population growth for the City is estimated at one percent through 2020. Based on this most recent estimate by the County, recent periods of slow growth, population decline, future annexation plans, and buildout 5 California Department of Finance. June 2011 2-6 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch02 (expected to occur by 2015); an annual population growth rate of one percent was used for the projections between 2015 and 2035. Table 2.2 Population - Current and Projected (Guidebook Table 2) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Data Years 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Source Service Area 15,682 16,482 17,323 18,206 19,135 20,111 Source (3) Population (2) Notes: 1. "Guidebook Table V refers to a specific table in the "Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare of 2010 Urban Water Management Plan" by DWR. 2. Service area population is defined as the population served by the distribution system. 3. Projected estimates based on expected population growth from the Mendocino County General Plan, adopted March 2010. An annual growth rate of one percent was used. Year Figure 2.4 Historical Population Historical and Projected Population 2010 Urban Water Management Plan e ^Projected Population City of Ukiah C According to 2000 Census, the City's Median Household Income (MHI) in year 1999 was $32,707. The State defines a disadvantaged community as a community with an annual MHI that is less than 80 percent of the statewide MHI. Using 2000 U.S. Census data, 80 percent of the statewide annual MHI is $37,540. Therefore, the City can be described as June 2011 2-7 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch02 a "disadvantaged community." The 2000 Census gives the racial demographic distribution of Ukiah as the following: 79.5 percent white, 1.0 percent African American, 3.8 percent American Indian, 1.7 percent Asian, and 9.7 percent other races. 2.3 EXPANSION PROJECTS The UWMPA requires that the UWMP identify major developments within the agency's service area that would require water supply planning. Law 10910. (a) Any city or county that determines that a project, as defined in section 10912, is subject to the California Environmental Quality... 10912. For the purpose of this part, the following terms have the following meanings: 10912 (a) "Project" means any of the following: (1) A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units. (2) A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1, 000 persons or having more than 500, 000 square feet of floor space. (3) A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250, 000 square feet of floor space. (4) A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms. (5) A proposed industrial, manufacturing or processing plant, or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650, 000 square feet of floor area. (6) A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in this subdivision. (7) A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of water required by a 500 dwelling unit project. The City is not currently considering any large expansion projects as defined by the UWMP. June 2011 2-8 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch02 Chapter 3 SYSTEM DEMANDS This chapter describes the City of Ukiah's (City's) baseline (base daily per capita) water use, the interim and urban water use targets, water system demands, water demand projections, and water use reduction plan. 3.1 BASELINES AND TARGETS The Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) requires that the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) identify a baseline water demand, urban water use target, and interim urban water use target for the City. Law 10608.20 (e). An urban retail water supplier shall include in its urban water management plan ... due in 2010 the baseline daily per capita water use, urban water use target, interim urban water use target, and compliance daily per capita water use, along with the bases for determining those estimates, including references to supporting data The baseline daily per capita use is the first step in determining the City's urban water use targets over the planning horizon. The current per capita use sets the baseline for which the urban and interim urban water use targets are determined. These targets are necessary to judge compliance with the 2020 use reductions set forth in the Water Conservation Bill of 2009 (SBx7-7). The baselines and targets summarized in this section apply specifically to the City. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) allows agencies to participate in regional alliances in which water use baselines and targets are determined regionally, provided certain criteria are met. The City has elected not to participate in such an alliance. 3.1.1 Baseline Water Use The first step in developing the baseline water use for the City is determining the applicable range and years for which the baseline average will be calculated. The UWMPA stipulates an agency may use either a 10 or 15 -year average to determine their baseline. If 10 percent of total urban retail water deliveries in 2008 were from recycled water, then the agency can use a 15 -year average baseline if it chooses. The City does recycle a small unmeasured amount of its wastewater effluent for landscape irrigation, process washdown, and spray water at the wastewater treatment plant. The City does not currently use recycled water to offset urban retail water use. For this reason, a 10 -year average was used for baseline determination. In addition to the 10 -year baseline, a 5 -year baseline is also calculated, which is used to establish the minimum criteria for the City's use reduction targets. A summary of the 2008 total and recycled water deliveries, 10 -year baseline range, and 5 -year baseline range is included in Table 3.1. June 2011 3-1 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.1 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use: 10 to 15 -Year Range (Guidebook Table 13) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Base Parameter Value Units 10- to 15 -Year 2008 total water deliveries 3,661 AFY Base Period 2008 total volume of delivered recycled water 0 AFY 2008 recycled water as a percent of total deliveries 0.0 Percent Number of years in base period 10 Years Year beginning base period range 1995 Year ending base period range 2004 -- 5 -Year Base Number of years in base period 5 Years Period Year beginning base period range 2003 Year ending base period range 2007 -- Notes: 1. "Guidebook Table V refers to a specific table in the "Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan" by DWR. The data used to calculate the 10 -year baseline is included in Table 3.2. The UWMPA requires a continuous range with the end of the range ending between December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2010 be used for the baseline determination. As shown in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2, the City's selected 10 -year base period begins in year 1995 and ends in year 2004. DWR allows agencies that meet specific criteria to deduct certain types of water uses from their baseline and target estimates, including recycled water, industrial process water, and agricultural water. At this time, the City has opted not to exclude industrial process water from its gross water use. DWR allows that agencies may revise their per capita water use targets in the 2015 round of UWMPs. The City may reconsider the industrial process water exclusion at that point. June 2011 3-2 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.2 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use: 10 -Year Range (Guidebook Table 14) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Base Period Year Distribution System Daily System Gross Water Annual Daily Per Capita Water Use Calendar Sequence Year Population Use (MGD) (gpcd) 1 1995 14,977 3.46 231 2 1996 15,088 3.59 238 3 1997 15,263 3.49 229 4 1998 15,351 3.36 219 5 1999 15,403 3.77 245 6 2000 15,480 3.65 236 7 2001 15,612 3.65 234 8 2002 15,714 3.72 237 9 2003 15,942 3.45 217 10 2004 15,921 3.68 231 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use 232 The data used to calculate the 5 -year baseline is included in Table 3.3. The UWMPA requires that a continuous range, with the end of the range ending between December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2010, be used for baseline determination. As shown in Table 3.3, the City's selected 5 -year base period begins in year 2003 and ends in year 2007. The City's historical water consumption for the period 1995 through 2010 is shown in Figure 3.1. This figure also depicts the selected 5 -year and 10 -year baseline values. 3.1.2 Target Water Use SBx7-7 is the new law governing water conservation in California that was enacted November 2009. The law requires that all water suppliers increase water use efficiency with the overall goal to decrease per -capita consumption within the state by 20 percent. SBx7-7 required DWR to develop certain criteria, methods, and standard reporting forms through a public process that can be used by water suppliers to establish their baseline water use and determine their water conservation targets (the UWMPA requires urban water suppliers to determine the urban and interim urban water use targets for 2020 and 2015, respectively). DWR provided four different methods to establish water conservation targets. These four methods are summarized in this section. June 2011 3-3 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.3 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use: 5 -Year Range (Guidebook Table 15) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Base Period Year Distribution Daily System System Gross Water Annual Daily Per Capita Water Use Sequence Calendar Year Population Use (MGD) (gpcd) 1 2003 15,942 3.45 217 2 2004 15,921 3.68 231 3 2005 15,981 3.35 210 4 2006 15,804 3.42 217 5 2007 15,742 3.34 212 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use 217 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Figure 3.1 Daily per Capita Water Use Historical Water Use and Baselines Selected 10 -Yr Baseline Water Use 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Selected 5 -Yr Baseline Water Use C` 3.1.2.1 Method 1 - Baseline Reduction Method The Method 1 2020 water conservation target is defined as a 20 percent reduction of average per -capita from the 10 -year continuous baseline period. Based on the baseline daily per capita use of 232 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) determined previously (Table 3.2), the target use for Method 1 is 185 gpcd. The 2015 interim water use target is June 2011 3-4 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 simply the midpoint of the baseline and the 2020 water conservation target, or 208 gpcd for Method 1 in the City's case. 3.1.2.2 Method 2 - Efficiency Standard Method The 2020 water conservation target of this method is determined by calculating efficiency standards for indoor use separately from outdoor use for residential sectors, and an overall reduction of 10 percent for commercial, industrial, and institutional (CII) sectors. The aggregated total of the efficiency standards in each area is then used to create a conservation target. Very few agencies within the State have the data necessary to determine a target water use using Method 2. It is not feasible for the City to use this methodology since the City lacks the detailed landscaped area estimates to calculate the landscaped area water use. 3.1.2.3 Method 3 - Hydrologic Region Method This method uses the ten regional urban water use targets for the state. Based on the water supplier's location within these regions, a static water use conservation target for 2020 is assigned. A map showing the California hydrologic regions and 2020 conservation goals is included in the DWR Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 UWMP (Guidebook). To determine the target using Method 3, 95 percent of the region -specific conservation goal is calculated. Based on a 2020 target of 137 gpcd for the North Coast region, the City's Method 3 target is 130 gpcd for 2020. The City's 2015 interim water use target for Method 3 is then calculated to be 181 gpcd. 3.1.2.4 Method 4 - BMP Based Method Method 4 identifies water savings obtained through identified practices and subtracts them from the baseline daily per capita water use value identified for the water supplier. The water savings identified that can be used to reduce the baseline daily per capita water use value include: • Indoor residential use savings; • Commercial, industrial, and institutional savings; • Landscape and water loss savings; and • Metered savings. The Method 4 per capita water use target was calculated using the City's 10 -year baseline period (1995 to 2004). However, information was not available on the CII metered water deliveries for 2004. Therefore, for the year 2004 only, the amount of water delivered to CII customers was assumed to be an average of the water delivered to CII accounts in 2003 June 2011 3-5 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 and 2005. CII water delivery data was available for all of the other years in the chosen 10 - year Method 4 baseline period. A discussion of each of savings components and the subsequent calculated savings specifically for the City is included below. Indoor Residential Savings. Since indoor and outdoor water use is delivered through a single meter, an assumption of 70 gpcd has been provided by DWR for standard residential indoor water use. To determine indoor residential savings potential, the draft provisional method outlines two methodologies. First, a best management practices (BMP) calculator has been developed to sum the savings for four conservation elements including single and multi -family residential housing toilets, residential washers, and showerheads. Due to insufficient data on the implementation of these water -saving measures, it is not used to assess indoor residential savings for the City. The City will use what has been termed the "default option" to determine these savings. Based on the provisional method, this default value is 15 gpcd. Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Savings. Baseline CII water use can be established for the City based on data provided in the City's DWR Public Water Systems Statistics Sheet for years 1995 to 2004 (the 10 -year baseline period). Based on this data, the baseline per capita CII water use for years 1995 to 2004 is 28 gpcd. The draft provisional method estimates a default value for CII savings of 10 percent. The CII water savings are therefore 3 gpcd. Landscape and Water Loss Savings. The landscape and water loss water use is determined by subtracting the default indoor water use of 70 gpcd and CII water use of 28 gpcd from the calculated year 1995 to 2004 baseline per capita use. Based on a baseline per capita water use of 232 gpcd, the landscape and water loss use is 133 gpcd. The draft provisional method estimates a default value for landscape and water loss savings of 21.6 percent. The landscape and water loss savings are therefore 29 gpcd. Metered Savings. Metered savings are considered in addition to the savings attributed to the three sectors previously discussed. Based on a volume of 145.7 million gallons (MG) of deliveries to unmetered connections in 1999 (which is the methodology established by DWR), the unmetered per capita use was 26 gpcd in 1999. Using the assumed savings outlined in the draft provisional method of 20 percent from full metering of the City's connections, savings from metering is calculated as 5 gpcd. A summary of the Method 4 water use target calculation procedure is shown on Figure 3.2. The City's 2020 target water use is calculated as the baseline water use minus the total savings (residential indoor, CII, landscape, and water loss, and meter savings). In the City's case, the total water savings accounts for 52 gpcd, which equates to a 2020 target water June 2011 3-6 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 use of 180 gpcd in 2020, and a corresponding interim water use target for Method 4 of 206 gpcd in 2015. A summary of baseline water use by sector and individual savings calculated using Method 4 is included in Table 3.4. 3.1.2.5 Minimum Water Use Reduction Requirement The final step in determining the applicability of the water use target for the City is to confirm the water use targets meet the minimum reduction requirements as defined by DWR. To confirm the chosen 2020 per capita target, the 5 -year average baseline previously determined (Table 3.3) is used. The chosen target (calculated using one of the four methods described above) must be less than 95 percent of the 5 -year baseline. In order to meet this minimum criteria, the City's 2020 target per capita water use must be less than or equal to 206 gpcd. 3.1.3 Summary of Baseline and Target Water Use Based on the 2020 water use targets calculated using the four methodologies described previously, the urban water use target for the City is 185 gpcd. Using the 10 -year baseline of 232 gpcd, the 2015 interim water use target is 208 gpcd. This target was determined using Method 1 (Section 3.1.2.3). According to the DWR guidelines, this target is valid since it is less than the minimum 5 -year baseline target confirmation criteria of 206 gpcd (Section 3.1.2.5). The baseline water use, target per capita use determined based on the four methods, and the selected target and interim target are summarized in Table 3.5. June 2011 3-7 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Indoor Metering Savings Residential CII Savings Landscape & Water Loss Savings Savings Base Water Deliveried to Indoor Daily Standard Unmetered Conservation Average Per Indoor Average Connections in Based on Baseline CI Baseline Midpointof X 0.20 + Historic Data + Water Use, X 0.10 + Capita Residential CII Water X 0.216 Water Water UseUse, Baseline Years, gpcd , 70 gpcd Use, gpcd gallons OR gpcd 15 gpcd default savings Service Area Population in 365 X Midpointof Days Baseline Year Figure 3.2 Method 4 Target Water Use Calculation Procedure 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Table 3.4 Method 4 Target Determination Summary 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Per Capita Water Use (gpcd) Baseline Water Use Residential Indoor(') 70 CII 28 Landscape/Water Loss (2) 133 Total 231 Water Savings Residential Indoor (3) 15 C I I (4) 3 Landscape/Water Loss (5) 29 Metered Savings (6) 5 Total 52 Method 4 2020 Target Water Use 180 Method 4 Interim 2015 Target Water Use 206 Notes: 1. Standard value based on guidelines in provisional Method 4. 2. Landscape/Water Loss = Total Baseline Water Use - Residential Indoor Water Use - CII Water Use 3. Standard value based on guidelines in draft provisional Method 4. 4. CII water savings of 10 percent based on guidelines in provisional Method 4. 5. Landscape/water loss savings of 21.6 percent based on guidelines in provisional Method 4. 6. Metered savings of 20 percent based on guidelines in provisional Method 4. June 2011 3-9 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.5 Baseline and Target Water Use Summary 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Target Based on Each Determination Method Minimum Baselines (gpcd) (gpcd) Reduction Interim Requirement(3) Target (4) Target(5) 10-Year(l) 5-Year(2) 1 2 3 4(3) (gpcd) (gpcd) (gpcd) 232 217 185 n/a 130 180 206 185 208 Notes: 1. 10 -Year Baseline Years: 1995 to 2004 2. 5 -Year Baseline Years: 2003 to 2007 3. Minimum criterion for the Urban Water Use Target is defined as the 95 of the 5 -year base daily per capita water use (0.95*217 gpcd). 4. Urban Water Use Target determined using Method 1. 5. Interim Urban Water Use Target defined as the average of the 10 -year baseline per capita water use and Urban Water Use Target. 3.2 WATER DEMANDS The UWMPA requires that the UWMP identify the quantity of water supplied to the agency's customers including a breakdown by user classification. Law 10631 (e) (1). Quantify, to the extent records are available, past and current water use, and projected water use (over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a)), identifying the uses among water use sectors including, but not necessarily limited to, all of the- following uses: (A) Single-family residential; (8) Multifamily; (C) Commercial; (D) Industrial; (E) Institutional and governmental, (F) Landscape; (G) Sales to other agencies; (H) Saline water intrusion barriers, groundwater recharge, or conjunctive use, or any combination thereof; and (I) Agricultural. 10631 (e) (2). The water use projections shall be in the same 5 -year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. 1063 1. 1 (a). The water use projections required by Section 10631 shall include projected water use for single-family and multifamily residential housing needed for lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, as identified in the housing element of any city, county, or city and county in the service area of the supp 3.2.1 Historical Water Use The City provides potable water service to its residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional customers within its service area. In 2010, the City produced 962 million gallons or 2,952 acre-feet (AF), which is equivalent to 2.6 million gallons per day (MGD) of water servicing a population of approximately 15,682. Table 3.6 lists the historical annual water production from 1995 to 2010. June 2011 3-10 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.6 Historic Monthly Water Production (1995 - 2010) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Annual Water Production Population Average Average Per Capita Total Annual Monthly Daily Consumption Year (MG) (MG) (MGD) Population(') (gpcd) 1995 1,264 105.3 3.5 14,977 231 1996 1,315 109.6 3.6 15,088 238 1997 1,274 106.2 3.5 15,263 229 1998 1,226 102.2 3.4 15,351 219 1999 1,376 114.7 3.8 15,403 245 2000 1,335 111.3 3.7 15,480 236 2001 1,332 111.0 3.6 15,612 234 2002 1,357 113.1 3.7 15,714 237 2003 1,261 105.1 3.5 15,942 217 2004 1,346 112.2 3.7 15,921 231 2005 1,223 101.9 3.4 15,981 210 2006 1,249 104.1 3.4 15,804 217 2007 1,220 101.7 3.3 15,742 212 2008 1,193 99.4 3.3 15,690 208 2009 998 83.2 2.7 15,666 175 2010 962 80.2 2.6 15,682 168 Notes: 1. Source: California Department of Finance Population Estimates. Table 3.7 and Table 3.8 summarize the historical number of connections and associated annual water use by customer type for year 2005 and 2010, respectively. Figure 3.3 shows the current year 2010 distribution of user types and the distribution of water use. June 2011 3-11 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.7 Water Deliveries — Actual, 2005 (Guidebook Table 3) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2005 Metered Not Metered Total No. of Deliveries(') No. of Deliveries (2) Deliveries(') Water Use Sectors Accounts(') (AFY) Accounts(') (AFY) (AFY) Single family 3,393 1,253 63 68 1,321 Multi -family 598 1,290 0 0 1,290 Commercial/Institutional 1,454 922 0 0 922 Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 Landscape 71 221 0 0 221 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 Other (Fire Service) 202 0 0 0 0 Total 5,718 3,687 63 68 3,754 Notes: 1. Source: 2005 DWR Public Water System Statistics. 2. Unmetered deliveries are estimated by water use sector using the unit deliveries for metered customers, and then scaled to match the unmetered water deliveries (total deliveries - metered deliveries). System losses cannot be reliably differentiated from unmetered deliveries to paying customers. For this reason, unmetered deliveries include system losses. 3.2.2 Per Capita Consumption The per capita consumption rate, coupled with the population forecasts provided in Chapter 2, is used for estimating the City's future water requirements, evaluating the adequacy of the supply source, and determining storage needs. From 1995 to 2010, the consumption rate in the City ranged between a low of 168 gpcd in 2010 and a high of 245 gpcd in 1999. As noted in Section 3.1.1, the City's selected 10 -year baseline water use was calculated to be 232 gpcd. Figure 3.4 illustrates the projected per capita water use reduction to meet the City's 2020 water use target. June 2011 3-12 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.8 Water Deliveries — Actual, 2010 (Guidebook Table 4) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2010 Metered Not Metered Total No. of Deliveries(') No. of Deliveries Deliveries(') Water Use Sectors Accounts(') (AFY) Accounts (AFY) (AFY) Single family 3,814 738 0 0 738 Multi -family 673 738 0 0 738 Commercial/Institutional 824 707 0 0 707 Industrial 3 51 0 0 51 Landscape 87 192 0 0 192 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 Other (Fire Service) 172 0 0 0 0 Total 5,573 2,427 0 0 2,427 Notes: 1. "Source: 2010 DWR Public Water System Statistics. 2010 Number of Accounts (Fire Service) 3% lily mmercial/ stitutional 15% Industrial 0.1% -andscape 2% :u re u 70 2010 Water Use Industrial 2% .andscape 8% 0% (Fire Service) 0% Figure 3.3 ®Single family ®Multi -family 2010 Water Use by Customer Type ®Commercial/Institutional ®Industrial 2010 Urban Water Management Plan ®Landscape ®AgricultureCity of Ukiah C' ., ®Other (Fire Service) June 2011 3-13 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 1995 2000 2005 2010 Annual Water Use Selected 10 -Yr Baseline Water Use Selected 5 -Yr Baseline Water Use Projected Water Use 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year Figure 3.4 Projected Per Capita Water Use 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah C Since the City's 1999 peak per capita water use, per capita demand has decreased significantly to its current value of 168 gpcd. Because of the City's recent water conservation efforts, the baseline, interim, and target per capita consumption calculated are all above current consumption. Therefore, the per capita water use targets and water demand projections (described in the next section) through 2035 represent relatively conservative values for the City. The recent decline in per capita consumption is likely due to the City having installed water meters on all service connections by 2005 and encouraged water conservation. In combination with the economic recession beginning in 2008, the installation of meters, adoption of a variable water rate structure based on consumption, and water conversation education efforts likely have encouraged residents to conserve water. It is not clear whether the recent declines in per capita consumption can be sustained by the City, and whether the declining water use trend is temporary or permanent. Accordingly, the conservative per capita consumptions and water use projections were used in this UWMP. The City may re-evaluate its target per capita use or its target determination method in its 2015 UWMP. June 2011 3-14 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 3.2.3 Water Demand Projections The projected annual water demands for year 2015 were developed by multiplying the projected 2015 population by the City's 2015 interim water use target of 208 gpcd. The projected annual water demands for year 2020 and beyond were developed by multiplying the projected population by the City's 2020 water use target (185 gpcd). Table 3.9 summarizes the projected water demands based on the City's 2020 water use target. Also included for reference in Table 3.9 is the projected water demand based on the selected 10 -year baseline water use. By meeting its target per capita water use, the City could reduce its year 2035 water use from 4.7 MGD (5,217 AFY) to 3.7 MGD (4,173 AFY). Figure 3.5 provides a graphical representation of the information presented in Table 3.9. Table 3.9 Projected Water Demands 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Projected Water Use (mgd) Distribution Target Demands(') Baseline Demands (2) System Year Population (MGD) (AFY) (MGD) (AFY) 2015 16,482 3.4 3,848 3.8 4,275 2020 17,323 3.2 3,595 4.0 4,493 2025 18,206 3.4 3,778 4.2 4,722 2030 19,135 3.5 3,971 4.4 4,963 2035 20,111 3.7 4,173 4.7 5,217 Notes: 1. Target demand projections are based on the City's per capita water use targets for 2015 and 2020. 2. Baseline demand projections are based on the City's selected 10 -year baseline water use. June 2011 3-15 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 The projected connections and water demands for each sector for years 2015 to 2035 are summarized in Table 3.10, Table 3.11, and Table 3.12. To project the number of connections per sector, it was assumed that the number of connections will grow consistently with the projected water demands. 3.2.3.1 Sales to Other Agencies To date, the City has made no sales to other agencies, nor does the City anticipate any in the future (Table 3.13), but the City is studying the possibility of delivering City water to other agencies either through direct sales or through the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District (Flood Control District). June 2011 3-16 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.10 Water Deliveries — Projected, 2015 (Guidebook Table 5) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2015 Metered Not Metered Total No. of Deliveries No. of Deliveries Deliveries Water Use Sectors Accounts (AFY) Accounts (AFY) (AFY) Single family 4,009 1,014 0 0 1,014 Multi -family 707 1,014 0 0 1,014 Commercial/Institutional 866 972 0 0 972 Industrial 3 70 0 0 70 Landscape 91 264 0 0 264 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 Other (Fire Service) 181 0 0 0 0 Total 5,857 3,333 0 0 3,333 Table 3.11 Water Deliveries — Projected, 2020 (Guidebook Table 6) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2020 Metered Not Metered Total No. of Deliveries No. of Deliveries Deliveries Water Use Sectors Accounts (AFY) Accounts (AFY) (AFY) Single family 4,213 947 0 0 947 Multi -family 743 947 0 0 947 Commercial/Institutional 910 908 0 0 908 Industrial 3 65 0 0 65 Landscape 96 247 0 0 247 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 Other (Fire Service) 190 0 0 0 0 Total 6,156 3,114 0 0 3,114 June 2011 3-17 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.12 Water Deliveries — Projected 2025, 2030, 2035 (Guidebook Table 7) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2025 Metered 2030 Metered 2035 Metered Water Use No. of Deliveries No. of Deliveries No. of Deliveries Sectors Accounts (AFY) Accounts (AFY) Accounts (AFY) Single family 4,428 995 4,654 1,046 4,891 1,099 Multi -family 781 995 821 1,046 863 1,099 Commercial/ 957 954 1,005 1,003 1,057 Institutional 1,054 Industrial 3 69 4 72 4 76 Landscape 101 259 106 272 112 286 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other (Fire 200 0 210 0 221 0 Service) Total 6,470 3,272 6,800 3,439 7,147 3,615 Table 3.13 Sales to Other Water Agencies (Guidebook Table 9) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Use (AFY) Agency 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total, AFY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.2.3.2 Other Water Demands Additional water uses and losses in the City's service area are presented in Table 3.14. Projected system losses are based on the average percent estimated losses incurred in between 2006 and 2010. Unaccounted-for water is calculated as the difference between yearly water production volumes and metered water deliveries. Average system losses between 2006 and 2010 are 13 percent, with water losses in 2010 estimated at 18 percent of total water produced. The estimated system losses for the past five years are higher than typical values. Identification of these losses will provide the City with the opportunity to improve its overall delivery system performance. Because the City still had 63 unmetered connections in 2005, the unaccounted-for water for that year is included in the unmetered delivery volumes in Table 3.7. June 2011 3-18 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.14 Additional Water Uses and Losses (Guidebook Table 10) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Use(') 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Saline Barriers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Groundwater Recharge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conjunctive Use 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Raw Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recycled Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 System Losses (2) N/A 526 515 481 506 531 559 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total, AFY N/A 526 515 481 506 531 559 Notes: 1. Any water accounted for in Guidebook Tables 3 through 7 are not included in this table. 2. System losses for 2005 are included in Table 3.7, in the unmetered delivery volume estimates. 3. System losses for 2015 through 2035 are based on the percentage losses from 2006 through 2010. 3.2.3.3 Total Water Demand Projections The City's total average annual demands are presented in Table 3.15. Water use for 2010 is less than the water use projected for 2015 because the City's current per capita daily use is less than the 2015 interim and 2020 per capita goals on which projected values are based. As discussed in the previous sections, the City does not have any plans for delivering urban water for uses other than municipal type uses (e.g.; residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.). For this reason, there should be no obstacles to the City providing the projected demands presented in Table 3.15 from a technical or economic perspective. June 2011 3-19 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.15 Total Water Use (Guidebook Table 11) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Use (AFY) Water Use 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Total water deliveries 3,754 2,427 3,333 3,114 3,272 3,439 3,615 Sales to other water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 agencies Additional water uses 0 526 515 481 506 531 559 and losses(') Total, AFY 3,754 2,952 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 Notes: 1. System losses for 2005 are included in Table 3.7, in the unmetered delivery volume estimates. 2. System losses for 2015 through 2035 are based on the percentage losses from 2006 through 2010. 3.2.4 Wholesale Water Demand Projections The UWMPA requires retail water agencies that receive wholesale water to report the projected water demand data that was sent to each wholesale agency from which it receives water. Law 10631 (k). Urban water suppliers that rely upon a wholesale agency for a source of water shall provide the wholesale agency with water use projections from that agency for that source of water in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. The wholesale agency shall provide information to the urban water supplier for inclusion in the urban water supplier's plan that identifies and quantifies, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water as required by subdivision (b), available from the wholesale agency to the urban water supplier over the same five-year increments, and during various water -year types in accordance with subdivision (c). An urban water supplier may rely upon water supply information provided by the wholesale agency in fulfilling the plan informational requirements of subdivisions (b) and (c). Flood Control District holds water rights permit 12947B for storage and use of up to 8,000 AF annually of water stored in Lake Mendocino and/or directly diverted from the east fork of the Russian River. The City has a water supply agreement that allows the purchase of up to 800 AF of water annually under the Flood Control District's permit. For purposes of this UWMP, the Flood Control District is considered a wholesale water provider (Table 3.16). 3.2.5 Lower Income Water Demand Projections Section 10631.1 (a) of the California Water Code requires that retail urban water suppliers include projected water use for lower income single family and multifamily households. Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code defines lower income households as 80 percent of the median income, adjusted for family size. Based on these definitions, June 2011 3-20 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Table 3.17 projects water demands associated with lower income water users through year 2035. These estimates are generated based on data from the 2000 Census and income group definitions from the California Health and Safety Code, which is based on percentage of median household income (MHI). Low income and very low income households are defined as making 50 percent and 30 percent, respectively, of the MHI. It was assumed thal income was evenly distributed through the income ranges given in the 2000 Census. It should be noted that the lower income demand projections presented in Table 3.17 are included in the total water use projections provided in Table 3.10 through Table 3.15. Table 3.16 Retail Agency Demand Projections Provided to Wholesale Suppliers 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (Guidebook Table 12) City of Ukiah 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Water Use (AFY) City of Ukiah Low Income Water Demands 2015 2020 2025 Contracted Volume Water Use (AFY) Wholesaler (AFY) 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 None 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Total 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Table 3.17 Low Income Projected Water Demands (Guidebook Table 8) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Use (AFY) Low Income Water Demands 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Single Family Residential 481 450 472 497 522 Multi -Family Residential 481 450 472 497 522 Total, AFY 962 899 945 993 1,044 Notes: 1. Low/moderate income percentages were based on 2000 Census data. 3.3 WATER USE REDUCTION PLAN The UWMPA requires that retail water agencies develop an implementation plan for compliance with the SBx7-7 water use targets. June 2011 3-21 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Law 10608.36. Urban wholesale water suppliers shall include in the urban water management plan... an assessment of their present and proposed future measures, programs, and policies to help achieve the water use reductions required by this part. 10608.26. Urban retail water suppliers are to prepare a plan for implementing the Water Conservation Bill of 2009 requirements and conduct a public meeting which includes consideration of economic impacts. The City determined its 10 -year baseline water use and urban water use targets in accordance with the methods described in the DWR 2010 UWMP Guidebook. After doing so, the interim and target per capita water uses were both higher than the current (2010) per capita water use estimates. If the City can maintain its low water consumption rates, it will meet 2020 conservation goals. However, if consumption rates begin to rise above interim and target water use goals, the City must implement additional conservation measures to meet its 2020 goals. Although the City is currently below its 2020 targets, the City intends to continue and develop its water conservation programs. Primary goals for the City's conservation efforts are described as Demand Management Measures (DMMs) in Chapter 6 of this UWMP. Implementation of appropriate DMMs will help the City reach its water use targets. In particular, the City currently performs the following services to encourage and/or require water conservation from its customers: • Meter audits help to identify water -use problems, recommend repairs, and instruct on efficient landscaping principles and use of irrigation timers when appropriate. • Leak detection, leak repair, and old meter replacement on an ongoing basis, which help identify system losses and provide more accurate readings. • Landscape plan review for new developments. Included in the City's Municipal Code is a requirement for all landscape planting to be appropriate for the City's climate and not require extensive irrigation. • Public awareness campaigns on water conservation issues through bill stuffers, Consumer Confidence Reports, radio broadcasts, and on the City's website. • School educational programs including water treatment plant tours and educational materials. • Water rate pricing schedule that encourages water conservation and varies based on meter size and unit consumption. • Conservation coordination efforts from all City staff members. • Regulations that give the City permission to discontinue water service for customers who waste water. • Ultra low flush toilet replacement incentive and rebate program. June 2011 3-22 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 All of the aforementioned water conservation activities have already been implemented by the City. The City will continue to pursue water conservation efforts as appropriate and make adjustments to available programs when necessary. These conservation efforts, along with the DMMs described in Chapter 6, will be implemented throughout the next 5 years until re-evaluation in the 2015 UWMP. June 2011 3-23 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch03 Chapter 4 SYSTEM SUPPLIES The Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) requires that the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) include a description of the agency's existing and future water supply sources for the next 20 years. The description of water supplies must include detailed information on the groundwater basin such as water rights, determination if the basin is in overdraft, adjudication decree, and other information from the groundwater management plan. Much of the information contained in Chapters 4 and 5 is summarized from the Technical Memorandum (TM) prepared by Wagner and Bonsignore, which describes the water supply sources, rights, and reliability pertaining to the City. The TM is included as Appendix D, which can be referenced for more detailed discussion of these topics. Law 10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following: 10631 (b). Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a) [to 20 years or as far as data is available]. If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water available to the supplier, all of the following information shall be included in the plan: 10631 (b) (1). (Provide a) copy of any groundwater management plan adopted by the urban water supplier... 10631 (b) (2). (Provide a) description of any groundwater basin or basins from which the urban water supplier pumps groundwater. For those basins for which a court or board has adjudicated the rights to pump groundwater, (provide) a copy of the order or decree adopted by the court or by the board... (Provide) a description of the amount of groundwater the urban water supplier has the legal right to pump under the decree ... For basins that have not been adjudicated, information as to whether the department has identified the basin or basins as overdrafted or has projected that the basin will become overdrafted if present management conditions continue, in the most current official departmental bulletin that characterizes the condition of the groundwater basin, and a detailed description of the efforts being undertaken by the urban water supplier to eliminate the long-term overdraft condition. 10631 (b) (3). (Provide a) detailed description and analysis of the location, amount, and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the urban water supplier for the past five years. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonably available, including, but not limited to, historic records. 10631 (b) (4). (Provide a) detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of groundwater that is projected to be pumped by the urban water supplier. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonable available, including, but not limited to, historic use records. June 2011 4-1 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 4.1 WATER SUPPLY SOURCES This section describes the existing and projected water supply sources for the City. The City's water supply sources include groundwater, surface water from the underflow of the Russian River, and project water available from the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District. In addition, the City is in the process of developing a Recycled Water Master Plan (RWMP), prepared by Carollo Engineers. Projected uses of recycled water and a description of RWMP efforts are described in Section 4.6. 4.1.1 Water Supply Facilities The City's water supply facilities include five active wells and a Ranney Collector. Table 4.1 below provides a summary of the water supply sources, including description of the type of supply source for each facility. Table 4.1 Water Supply Sources 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Production Capacity Facility Type of Supply Current Status (GPM) Ranney Collector (2) Surface water Active 3,194 Well #3 Groundwater influenced by Active 600 surface water Well #4 Groundwater Active 799 Well #5 Groundwater influenced by Active 300 surface water Well #7 Groundwater Active 799 Well #8 Groundwater Active 694 Total Active Well Capacity (GPM) 6,386 Total Active Well Capacity (AFY) 10,308 Notes: 1. Source: City staff records. 2. The Ranney Collector can only be used during the dry season when surface water turbidity is low. The City's water supply sources fall into two categories: surface water diversion and groundwater. The City's surface water is obtained from the Ranney Collector and Wells 3 and 5, which draw water from an alluvial zone along the Russian River. Water taken from these sources is considered under the influence of surface water by the California June 2011 4-2 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Department of Public Health (DPH). Accordingly, water diverted from the Ranney Collector and Wells 3 and 5 is classified as surface water. The City also draws groundwater from Wells 4, 7, and 8. 4.1.2 Distribution System and Storage The City's water distribution system consists of: (1) pumping from wells that are either groundwater wells or wells under the influence of surface water, (2) surface water collection, (3) high-capacity pumping station at the water treatment plant, (4) storage reservoirs, and (5) piping to and within the distribution system. After chlorination, surface water Well 3 is pumped directly into the distribution system. Wells 4 and 7, following chlorination, also pump directly into the water distribution system. The high service pumps at the water treatment plant draw stored, treated water and pump it into the water distribution system. The City has eight distribution reservoirs with a combined storage capacity of 6.1 million gallons (MG; 18.7 acre-feet [AF]). The storage reservoirs provide short term treated water storage to be used on a daily basis and for emergency situations such as fire fighting. The reservoirs include a 2.5 MG concrete tank, a 100,000 -gallon steel tank, a 13,000 -gallon redwood tank, a 30,000 -gallon steel tank (constructed in 1996), a 135,000 -gallon concrete clearwell with transfer station, and three new storage tanks completed in 2005 (two 1.5 MG tanks and one 315,000 -gallon tank). The storage facilities are not considered additional water supply sources for the City. The distribution system is divided into four pressure zones. The main zone, Zone 1, (approximately 97 percent of the system) is served by gravity from the 2.5 MG and 1.5 MG storage tanks. These tanks are supplied by all system resources via the main distribution system. There is also a 1.5 MG clearwell and high service pump station in Zone 1. The remaining three smaller zones are supplied by booster pump stations via the main distribution zone. Zone 2 is served by gravity from the 100,000 -gallon and 315,000 -gallon storage tanks. This zone is supplied by the Golf Course Booster Pump Station at a rate of 350 gallons per minute (GPM). Zone 3, which has four service connections, is served by a 30,000 -gallon bolted steel storage tank. This zone is supplied by a 100 -GPM booster pump. Zone 4 with three service connections is served by the 13,000 -gallon redwood storage tank. This zone is supplied by the 40 -GPM Lookout Drive Booster Pump Station. 4.1.3 Current and Projected Water Sources The City's current and projected water supply sources are summarized in Table 4.2. June 2011 4-3 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District holds Water Right Permit 12947B for storage and use of up to 8,000 AF annually. This water supply includes water stored in Lake Mendocino and directly diverted from the East Fork of the Russian River. The City has a water supply agreement that allows the purchase up to 800 AF of water annually under the Permit 129478. The Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District is considered a wholesale provider for purposes of this UWMP. Table 4.2 Water Supplies - Current and Projected (Guidebook Table 16) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Supply Sources Projected Water Supply (AFY) Wholesale Water purchased Supplied from: Volume 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Project Water Yes 800 800 800 800 800 800 (Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District) Supplier -produced No 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 groundwater (2) Supplier -produced No 14,480 14,480 14,480 14,480 14,480 14,480 surface water (3) Supplier -produced No 2,027 2,027 2,027 2,027 2,027 2,027 surface water (pre - 1914 Rights) Transfers In No 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exchanges In No 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recycled Water (4) No 200 428 667 919 1,183 1,462 Desalinated Water No 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 21,212 21,440 21,679 21,931 22,195 22,474 Notes: 1. "Guidebook Table V refers to a specific table in the "Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan" by DWR. 2. Based on groundwater pumping capacities provided by the City. 3. Permit 12952 (Application 15704) authorizes diversion of 20 CFS, with no annual limit. Therefore, the City's potential water right is reported above. 4. Estimated values based on preliminary data for use in the City's Recycled Water Master Plan. Also included in the City's water supply is diversion of Russian River underflow for municipal purposes, under a water right Permit 12952 (Application 15704). Under June 2011 4-4 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Permit 12952, water can be diverted at a rate not to exceed 20 cubic feet per second (CFS; 9,000 GPM) from January 1 through December 31 with no annual limit. Additionally, the City has a pre -1914 appropriative water right for at least 2.8 CFS for diversion from the Russian River for a maximum of 2,027 AF annually. 4.1.4 Wholesale Supplies As indicated on Table 4.3, the City has the opportunity to receive wholesale water from the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District. Table 4.3 Wholesale Supplies — Existing and Planned Sources of Water (Guidebook Table 17) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Contracted Projected Water Supply (AFY) Volume Wholesale Sources (AFY) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Project Water (Mendocino 800 800 800 800 800 800 County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District) Total 800 800 800 800 800 800 4.2 GROUNDWATER BASIN This section describes the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin (Basin). 4.2.1 Groundwater Basin Description For planning purposes, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) has subdivided the State of California into ten separate hydrologic regions, corresponding to the State's major drainage basins. The Basin (Number 1-52 as described in DWR Bulletin 118) is located in southeastern Mendocino County and is the largest basin along the Russian River. The Basin is approximately 22 miles long and 5 miles wide, and underlies Ukiah Valley and Redwood Valley. This basin is not adjudicated. Detailed information and discussion on the geological characteristics of the Basin is included Appendix C. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) published a Water Resources Investigation Report 85-4258 in 1986 on the Groundwater Resources in Mendocino County, California (USGS Investigative Report). Storage capacities and groundwater elevations within the Basin were evaluated in the USGS Investigative Report. USGS concluded that groundwater June 2011 4-5 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 wells in the Basin, monitored over a 30 -year period, show no prominent long term declines. In addition, hydrograph analysis indicates that the Basin is recharged fully each year except when precipitation falls below 60 percent of normal. DWR Bulletin 118 suggests that groundwater in storage is approximately 90,000 AF in the upper 100 feet of the most productive area of the Ukiah Valley, and an additional 45,000 AF within the margins of the Ukiah Valley. Therefore, the volume of water available from pumping from the upper 100 feet of the most productive portion of the aquifer is estimated at 90,000 acre-feet. Groundwater is hydraulically connected to and interacts with surface flows. Plate I in Appendix C shows the estimated boundaries of the groundwater basin consistent with DWR Bulletin 118, and the estimated groundwater availability within the Basin. 4.2.2 Groundwater Management Plan A groundwater management plan has not been prepared for the City, Ukiah Valley, or Mendocino County. In the future, the City may consider coordination with other agencies within the Basin to develop a more comprehensive groundwater management plan. 4.2.3 Groundwater Levels and Historical Trends In general, the Basin experiences seasonal and year-to-year variation in groundwater elevations due to relative rainfall and pumping, as described in Bulletin 118 and the USGS Investigative Report. However, these variations tend to be small and water levels, in general, recover. Groundwater elevations fluctuate seasonally, being the highest level in March or April at the end of the wet season, and lowest in October at the end of the dry season. Seasonal fluctuations range on the order of 5 to 20 feet. Long-term measurements are taken and recorded from several wells within the Ukiah Valley. Plate II in Appendix C shows available groundwater hydrographs within the Ukiah Valley. The USGS Investigative Report found that, from the available hydrographs of the Basin, none of the hydrographs show prominent long-term declines. In fact, water levels measured during the 1980s are similar to those measured during the 1960s and 1970s. DWR Bulletin 118 corresponds with this assessment. According to Bulletin 118, groundwater levels in the Basin have remained relatively stable in the past 30 years. As expected, there is increased drawdown during summer months and less recovery in winter months when the area experiences drought conditions. Post -drought groundwater conditions rebound to approximately the same levels as pre -drought conditions. Based on the historical information available for the Basin, groundwater supplies are expected to adequately meet existing and future demands. June 2011 4-6 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 4.2.4 Groundwater Overdraft The current and historical groundwater trends for this Basin indicate that there is no long-term decline in water levels that suggest water shortage or overdraft. The Basin is not considered to be in a state of overdraft by DWR, and is not projected to be in a state of overdraft in the near future. 4.3 EXISTING AND PROJECTED GROUNDWATER PUMPING This section quantifies the historical and projected groundwater pumping by the City (Table 4.4 and Table 4.5). Table 4.4 Historic Groundwater Pumping (Guidebook Table 18) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Metered or Historic Pumping Rates (AFY) Basin Name Unmetered 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Ukiah Valley Groundwater Metered 1,347 1,185 1,380 1,486 1,990 Basin(') Total Groundwater Pumped (2) 1,347 1,185 1,380 1,486 1,990 Groundwater as Percent of Total Water 6.4 5.6 6.6 7.1 9.5 Supply Notes: 1. Total water supply is provided in Table 4.2 and is 21,012 acre-feet per year (in 2010), including contract water, appropriative rights, and groundwater. All of the City water, whether diverted from groundwater wells or diverted under its appropriative rights, is supplied by groundwater. 2. Groundwater volumes taken from DWR statistic sheets 2006-2010, provided by the City. June 2011 4-7 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Table 4.5 Projected Groundwater Pumping (Guidebook Table 19) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Projected Pumping Rates (AFY) Basin Name 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 Total Groundwater Pumped') 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 Groundwater as Percent of Total 17 17 17 16 16 Water Supply (2) Notes: 2. Groundwater pumped represents the total groundwater pumping capacity of Wells 4, 5, 7, and 8. Actual groundwater pumped will likely be less than the total groundwater pumping capacity. 3. Projected total water supply volumes are listed in Table 4.2 of this UWMP. 4.4 TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE OPPORTUNITIES The UWMPA requires that the UWMP address the opportunities for transfers or exchanges. Law 10631 (d). Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-term or long-term basis. This section quantifies transfer and exchange opportunities for the City (Table 4.6). The City does not transfer or exchange water with its neighboring water suppliers. However, the City has emergency intertie agreements with Millview County Water District and Willow County Water District, which provides that in the event of a water supply emergency, the City will receive water deliveries from the Districts through the interconnected water supply system. However, the City is considering a regional water management plan that may involve other water purveyors within the Ukiah Valley, including: • Calpella County Water District • Hopland Utilities District • Millview County Water District • Redwood Valley County Water District • Rogina Water Company • Sonoma County Water Agency • Willow County Water District June 2011 4-8 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 The regional planning effort is currently in its early development stages. Involved agencies are in the process of identifying priorities and needs prior to moving forward with any potential future transfers or exchanges. Table 4.6 Transfer and Exchange Opportunities (Guidebook Table 20) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Transfer or Short Term or Proposed Transfer Agency Exchange Long Term Volume (AFY) Calpella County Water District N/A N/A 0 Hopland Utility District N/A N/A 0 Millview County Water District Yes Long-term N/A Redwood Valley County Water District N/A N/A 0 Rogina Water Company N/A N/A 0 Sonoma County Water Agency N/A N/A 0 Willow County Water District Yes Long-term N/A Total 0 Note: 1. Millview and Willow County Water Districts have entered into an emergency intertie agreement with the City. Although the agreement does not specify volumes, the signatories agree to provide water supplies during a water supply emergency, as the systems are interconnected. 4.5 DESALINATED WATER OPPORTUNITIES The UWMPA requires that the UWMP address the opportunities for development of desalinated water, including ocean water, brackish water, and groundwater. Law 10631 (i). Describe the opportunities for development of desalinated water, including, but not limited to, ocean water, brackish water, and groundwater, as a long term supply. This section describes the desalinated water opportunities for the City (Table 4.7). The surface water and groundwater supplies currently used by the City do not require desalinization. Saltwater intrusion is not expected to occur in the Basin. The City has no immediate plans to explore desalinization opportunities because its surface and groundwater sources are expected to provide adequate long-term supply. June 2011 4-9 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Table 4.7 Opportunities for Desalinated Water 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Sources of Water Opportunities for Desalinated Water Ocean Water None Brackish Ocean Water None Brackish Groundwater None Other None 4.6 RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES The UWMPA requires that the UWMP address the opportunities for development of recycled water, including the description of existing recycled water applications, quantities of wastewater currently being treated to recycled water standards, limitations on the use of available recycled water, an estimate of projected recycled water use, the feasibility of projected uses, and practices to encourage the use of recycled water. Law 10633. Provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. The preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies that operate within the supplier's service area. 10633 (a). (Describe) the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the supplier's service area, including a quantification of the amount of wastewater collected and treated and the methods of wastewater disposal. 10633 (b). (Describe) the quantity of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, is being discharged, and is otherwise available for use in a recycled water project. 10633 (c). (Describe) the recycled water currently being used in the supplier's service area, including, but not limited to, the type, place, and quantity of use. 10633 (d). (Describe and quantify) the potential uses of recycled water, including, but not limited to, agricultural irrigation, landscape irrigation, wildlife habitat enhancement, wetlands, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, indirect potable reuse, and other appropriate uses, and a determination with regard to the technical and economic feasibility of serving those uses. 10633 (e). (Describe) the projected use of recycled water within the supplier's service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and a description of the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected pursuant to this subdivision. 10633 (f). (Describe the) actions, including financial incentives, which may be taken to encourage the use of recycled water, and the projected results of these actions in terms of acre-feet of recycled water used per year. 10633 (g). (Provide a) plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the supplier's service June 2011 4-10 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual distribution systems, to promote recirculating uses, to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased use. 4.6.1 Wastewater Treatment Facilities The Ukiah Wastewater Treatment Plant (UWWTP) is owned and operated by the City. The UWWTP receives wastewater from the City's wastewater collection system and the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District (UVSD) wastewater collection system, and serves a population of about 20,000 residential, commercial, and industrial customers. The City collection system receives wastewater from about 82 percent of the City's service area and serves about 75 percent of the City's population. The UVSD serves the remaining portion of the City's service area and about 25 percent of the City's population, as well as an additional 5,000 residential customers from the urban areas surrounding the City. The UWWTP includes primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment facilities, as well as solids handling facilities. The tertiary treatment facilities are referred to as the Advanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) System. Table 4.8 summarizes the treatment capacity of the UWWTP and Table 4.9 summarizes the major components of the UWWTP facilities. The UWWTP's effluent discharges are regulated by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit — Order No. R1-2006-0049, NPDES No. CA0022888. The permit was adopted on September 20, 2006 and expires on November 9, 2011. Table 4.8 Treatment Capacities for UWWTP 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Secondary AWT System(') Design Flow Criterion Units Treatment (Tertiary Treatment) Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) MGD 3.01 N/A(2) Average Wet Weather Flow (AWWF) MGD 6.89 4 Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) MGD 24.5 8 Note: 1. The Advanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) Facility produces effluent that meets Title 22 recycled water requirements. 2. The AWT system is not operated during dry weather flows. June 2011 4-11 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Table 4.9 Major Components of UWWTP Facilities 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah AWT System Primary and Secondary (Tertiary Treatment Treatment Facilities Facilities) Solids Handling Facilities • influent pump station • applied water pump • dissolved air flotation • bar screen facility and grit station thickeners removal system • coagulation system • anaerobic digesters • primary clarifiers • multimedia tertiary filters • belt filter press for • trickling filter pump station • chlorine contact basins dewatering and trickling filters • dechlorination system • aeration basins • solids contact tanks • secondary clarifiers • chlorine disinfection system The UWWTP discharges disinfected secondary effluent to three percolation/evaporation ponds located at the UWWTP on a year-round basis, and discharges disinfected tertiary effluent to the Russian River as needed during wet weather months. The UWWTP is only permitted to discharge disinfected, tertiary wastewater to the Russian River from October 1 through May 14 at a discharge rate of up to one percent of the total Russian River flow. The Water Quality Control Plan for the North Coast Region (Basin Plan) prohibits the discharge of treated wastewater from the UWWTP from May 15 through September 30. Discharge of treated wastewater effluent is a critical component of the City's water balance. During dry weather months, wastewater flows to the UWWTP are low enough that the full flow is stored in the percolation ponds. During these months, the AWT System is not in operation. During wet weather flows, the AWT System is operated to provide tertiary treatment of flows in excess of that which can be stored in the ponds. Flows in excess of that which can be stored in the ponds and that which can be discharged to the Russian River must be disposed of by other means including reuse of treated effluent onsite. The UWWTP currently reuses an average of about 0.29 MGD of treated effluent onsite (323 AFY). In recent wet years, the UWWTP has discharged the maximum flow that can be stored in the ponds and discharged to the river. As flows increase in the future, additional pond storage will be needed or an additional discharge alternative, such distribution to recycled water customers, must be developed. 4.6.1.1 History of Expansions The original wastewater treatment facility was constructed in 1958 and provided secondary treatment at an average dry weather flow capacity of 2.5 MGD and a peak wet weather flow capacity of 10.5 MGD. At that time all treated effluent was discharged to the Russian River. June 2011 4-12 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 The UWWTP has been expanded and upgraded several times since then. In 1983 the facility was expanded to increase the treatment capacity to an average dry weather flow capacity of 2.8 MGD and a maximum wet weather capacity of 7.0 MGD. In 1986, the third percolation/evaporation pond was constructed to increase the treated effluent storage capacity and in 1989 an effluent pump station was constructed to convey secondary treated effluent to the third pond. In 1989, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) required tertiary treatment of all river discharges and secondary treatment for all discharges to the evaporation/percolation ponds. To meet this requirement, the plant was upgraded again in 1995. The project included the construction of the fourth secondary clarifier, a new solids handling facility, and the AWT system, as well as upgrades to the headworks. The most recent upgrade to the facility occurred in 2009 to expand the facility to its current treatment capacity and to upgrade the AWT system to meet Title 22 recycled water standards. This upgrade included a new headworks facility, a new bar screen facility and grit removal system, conversion of the existing secondary clarifiers to primary clarifiers, a new trickling filter pump station and upgrades to the trickling filters, conversion of the existing primary clarifiers to solids contact tanks, modifications to the chlorine disinfection facilities, and other miscellaneous upgrades. 4.6.1.2 Future Expansions Although no expansion projects are planned for the near term, the City is expected to grow and the UWWTP will need to be expanded to accommodate this growth. In 2003, the City developed 2025 Design Criteria for the City's wastewater treatment capacity and projected that the total wastewater flows of the service area would increase steadily over the next few decades. The total flow in 2025 was projected to be approximately 6,363 AFY, equivalent to an average annual flow of about 5.7 MGD. 4.6.2 Water Recycling Facilities The UWWTP's AWT system produces disinfected, tertiary treated effluent that meets Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3, California Code of Regulations (CCR) for recycled water. The City is currently developing a RWMP to determine how this effluent can be put to its highest and best use to increase the reliability and maximize the capacity of the City's wastewater treatment facilities. Analysis of the tertiary effluent water quality is underway to determine the various applications the recycled water could be used for, especially with respect to irrigation. The AWT system is currently operated as needed during wet weather months (October through mid May) to treat flows in excess of that which can be stored in the onsite percolation/evaporation ponds. Although this effluent meets recycled water standards, it is not distributed to any recycled water users outside the treatment plant and is discharged by gravity to the Russian River. The UWWTP does not currently have any excess storage on site to store the recycled water or pumping capacity to deliver the recycled water to June 2011 4-13 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 potential customers. At a minimum a new pump station and distribution system would be needed to convey the water to recycled water customers. A significant number of potential recycled water customers have been identified through previous studies and the preliminary efforts of the RWMP. These customers primarily include local farmers and agricultural businesses. Other potential customers include City - owned sites such as the Ukiah Municipal Airport, City parks and schools, Anton Stadium, the City softball complex, the City Civic Center, the City and County Fairgrounds, and the Ukiah Golf Course. Through initial RWMP efforts, about 700 acres of vineyards and orchards have been identified as potential land that could be served with recycled water. At these sites the recycled water would primarily be used for frost protection and irrigation. The 2005 Urban Water Management Plan estimated about 236 acres of publicly -owned land that could be irrigated with recycled water. In developing the RWMP, the City will further identify, quantify, and map the potential recycled water demand in the City and surrounding areas. It will also group potential customers into recycled water service areas based on their location. The groupings will be used to define recycled water project alternatives and potential phasing of a recycled water program. 4.6.3 Wastewater Generation Table 4.10 includes the historical and projected wastewater flows collected and treated within the service area. Projected wastewater flows are based on actual wastewater flow data from 2001 — 2010 and population data and projections presented herein. Table 4.11 summarizes the projected methods of disposal of wastewater flows. Values presented herein are preliminary and for example purposes only. They are to be further developed and finalized in the adopted RWMP. Table 4.12 summarizes the projected methods of disposal of wastewater flows. June 2011 4-14 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Table 4.10 Recycled Water - Wastewater Collection and Treatment (Guidebook Table 21) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Volume (AFY) Type of Wastewater 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Wastewater Collected and 4,592 4,668 4,896 5,135 5,387 5,652 5,930 Treated in Service Area Volume that meets 441 1,686 1,913 2,153 2,405 2,669 2,947 recycled water standard Notes: 1. 2005 and 2010 wastewater flows based on actual plant data. 2. Wastewater flow projections for 2015 - 2035 based on wastewater flows from 2001 - 2010 and population projections presented herein. Table 4.11 Recycled Water - Non -Recycled Wastewater Disposal (Guidebook Table 22) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Treatment Volume (AFY) Method of Disposal Level 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Discharge to Russian Tertiary 1,686 1,686 1,686 1,686 1,686 1,686 River Evaporation/ Secondary 2,782 2,782 2,782 2,782 2,782 2,782 Percolation from Ponds Reuse within Plant Secondary 200 200 200 200 200 200 Recycled water use Tertiary 0 228 467 719 983 1,262 Total 4,668 4,896 5,135 5,387 5,652 5,930 Notes: 1. Assumes that evaporation losses in the UWWTP ponds are negligible. 2. Assumes discharge to the river and to the percolation ponds remains the same because facility is currently near its discharge capacity during wet years. 3. Assumes recycled water program is implemented to make up the difference between projected wastewater volumes and current volumes discharged to the Russian River, discharged to the ponds, and reused onsite. 4.6.4 Current Recycled Water Use Table 4.12 summarizes the recycled water use that was projected in the 2005 Urban Water Management Plan and the actual recycled water use that has occurred. As projected, the only recycled water use that has occurred is on-site reuse of secondary treated effluent for landscape irrigation, process washdown, and spray water. June 2011 4-15 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Table 4.12 2010 Recycled Water Use Compared to 2005 UWMP Use Projections (Guidebook Table 24) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Volume (AFY) User Type 2010 Actual 2005 Projection for 2010 Agricultural Irrigation 0 0 Landscape Irrigation 0 0 Commercial Irrigation 0 0 Golf Course Irrigation 0 0 Wildlife Habitat 0 0 Wetlands 0 0 Industrial Reuse 0 0 Groundwater Recharge 0 0 Seawater Barrier 0 0 Geothermal Energy 0 0 Indirect Potable Reuse 0 0 Consumptive reuse within the plant(') 200 323 Total 200 323 Notes: 1. Use of recycled water within the WWTP property boundaries estimated by City staff. 4.6.5 Projected Recycled Water Use Potential uses for recycled water in the Ukiah Valley include urban irrigation, agricultural irrigation and agricultural frost protection. The City is currently potential recycled water users within the Valley as part of the RWMP. Preliminary estimates have been developed for agricultural applications and urban irrigation and are included in Table 4.13. June 2011 4-16 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 Table 4.13 Recycled Water — Potential Future Use (Guidebook Table 23) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Volume (AFY) User Type Description Feasible? 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Agricultural Irrigation Irrigation and TBD (2) 216 444 683 934 1,198 frost protection for vineyards and orchards Landscape Irrigation City parks, TBD (2) 11 23 36 49 63 schools and recreational facilities Commercial TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Irrigation Golf Course TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Irrigation Wildlife Habitat TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Wetlands TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Industrial Reuse TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Groundwater TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Recharge Seawater Barrier TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Geothermal Energy TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Indirect Potable TBD (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Reuse Other Reuse within Yes 200 200 200 200 200 the wastewater treatment plant Total 428 667 919 1,183 1,462 Notes: 1. All values and descriptions presented herein are preliminary and are to be finalized in the Recycled Water Master Plan. Assumes 95 percent of recycled water use will be for agricultural use and 5 percent will be for landscape irrigation. 2. To be determined in the City's Recycled Water Master Plan. The scope of recycled water use within the City will be determined through the recycled water master planning process and detailed in the RWMP. The master planning effort will yield recycled water customer service area groups and recycled water project alternatives. Potential recycled water customers will be grouped into possible recycled water service area groups based on their location. The alternatives development process will include June 2011 4-17 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 defining the transmission, distribution, and storage required to supply recycled water to each of the service area groups. The alternatives will include sizing and routing of pipelines, sizing, location and elevation of storage and sizing of pump stations. Successful implementation of recycled water use also hinges on public support and acceptance. The City intends to work closely with stakeholders including its customers, farmers and wine growers, associated agencies, and others throughout the master planning process to ensure the benefits and costs of recycled water are fully communicated and understood. Visioning and educational workshops will be held to address the concerns of potential customers, including but not limited to: • Subsidization of the recycled water program; • Correspondence of seasonal water demands to recycled water supply and storage requirements; • Impacts of recycled water on organic certification and marketability of crops; • Impacts of recycled water on water rights; • Improvement of the reliability of existing supplies due to recycled water use, particularly with respect to frost protection needs. To implement recycled water use, the City will need to install a distribution system that will convey the recycled water to existing customers. Depending on the use, customers may also need to develop private storage capacity. For example, growers that will use the water for frost protection during frost events will need to store the recycled water conveyed from the UWWTP for use during frost events. 4.6.6 Encouraging Recycled Water Use To encourage recycled water use, the City plans to: hold educational workshops to inform and involve stakeholders; work closely with stakeholders to evaluate recycled water program alternatives; work to secure funding to offset costs to the City. As part of the RWMP, the City will hold visioning and educational workshops to identify and address stakeholder concerns, to determine stakeholder values and challenges, and to develop public support of recycled water use. The City will also work closely with stakeholders to evaluate the cost and benefits of various recycled water program alternatives. The City will take a triple bottom line approach using financial, social, and environmental criteria, developed from stakeholder input, to holistically assess the impact of each alternative. To minimize financial impacts, the City will work to identify equitable cost recovery methods and capitalize on all available alternative funding options including grant and low-interest loans. June 2011 4-18 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 The City's RWMP will determine the specific methods that the City will use to encourage uses of recycled water. The City's methods to encourage recycled water use (Table 4.14) will be developed and described in the City's RWMP. Table 4.14 Methods to Encourage Recycled Water Use (Guidebook Table 25) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Projected Volume (AFY) Actions 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Financial Incentives TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') Other TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') TBD(') Notes: 1. These values will be determined in the City's Recycled Water Master Plan. 4.6.7 Recycled Water Use Optimization Plan The RWMP will provide the City of Ukiah with short- and long-term alternatives for maximizing their resources through the implementation of recycled water. The RWMP will consider projected water and wastewater supply and demand to identify the City's maximum expansion point for recycled water use. 4.7 FUTURE WATER PROJECTS The UWMPA requires that suppliers describe water supply projects and programs may be undertaken to meet the projected water demands. Law 10631 (h). (Describe) all water supply projects and water supply programs that may be undertaken by the urban water supplier to meet the total projected water use as established pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10635. The urban water supplier shall include a detailed description of expected future projects and programs, other than the demand management programs identified pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (f), that the urban water supplier may implement to increase the amount of the water supply available to the urban water supplier in average, single -dry, and multiple -dry water years. The description shall identify specific projects and include a description of the increase in water supply that is expected to be available from each project. The description shall include an estimate with regard to the implementation timeline for each project or program. The City does not currently have planned future water supply projects. As discussed in previous sections, the City's current supply sources are considered adequate for providing existing and projected water demands. Currently, the City's total supply capacity of its wells and Ranney Collector is 10,308 AFY (6,386 GPM). The City's firm capacity, which is defined as the total capacity minus the capacity of the two largest supply sources, is 6,315 AFY (3,912 GPM). The City's firm June 2011 4-19 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 capacity is approximately 43 percent higher than the maximum projected demand through 2035. The total current supply capacity is 65 percent higher than projected 2035 demands. Therefore, the City has no planned projects to increase its water supply production capacity. Maintenance and well replacement projects may be performed on an as -needed basis. June 2011 4-20 pvflCarollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch04 �C— a cu o N o0 n N Table 4.15 Future Water Supply Projects (Guidebook Table 26) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Projected Annual Supply (AFY) Multiple Dry Projected Multiple Dry Year Multiple Dry Projected Completion Potential Project Single Dry Year First Second Year Third Project Name Start Date Date Constraints Normal Year Year Year Year Year None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Chapter 5 WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY AND WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING This chapter describes the reliability of the City of Ukiah's (City's) water supplies, including a discussion of the City's water shortage contingency plan, as well as potential supply disruptions associated with water quality issues and drought. 5.1 WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY The Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) requires that the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) address the reliability of the agency's water supplies. This includes a description of supplies that are vulnerable to seasonal or climatic variations. Law 10631 (f). An urban water supplier shall describe in the plan water management tools and options used by that entity that will maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions. 10631 (c) (2). For any water source that may not be available at a consistent level of use, given specific legal, environmental, water quality, or climatic factors, describe plans to replace that source with alternative sources or water demand management measures, to the extent practicable. This section describes the water supply reliability of the water supply sources for the City. 5.1.1 Resource Maximization/Import Minimization The City recognizes the importance of maintaining a high quality reliable water supply. Although water is a renewable resource, there is a limit on the amount of water that can be sustainably drawn from a given supply source (e.g., groundwater basins, surface water sources). The main focus for the City is to maximize the efficient use of water and to promote conservation. This will be accomplished through the implementation of demand management measures (DMMs) that have not been implemented by the City, continued implementation of DMMs that are currently being implemented by the City, and other conservation activities. The City is committed to maximizing its use of current supply sources. As described in Chapter 4 of this UWMP, the City has groundwater and surface water resources available within the Ukiah Valley to meet existing and projected demands. In 2008, the City brought Wells 7 and 8 online for continued maximization of its groundwater supply. In addition, the City maintains its existing surface water diversion facilities (the Ranney Collector and Well 3) and has petitioned the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to include additional points of diversion under Permit 12952 (Application 15704). The City does not import water and does not anticipate importing water in the future to augment supply. June 2011 5-1 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 5.1.2 Factors Affecting Supply Reliability There are a variety of factors that can impact water supply reliability. Factors impacting the City's supply sources are indicated as appropriate in Table 5.1. A brief discussion on each of these factors is provided below. Due to the nature of the City's appropriative rights and the volume of storage within the groundwater basin, it is unlikely that the City would experience a reduction in supply reliability. An evaluation of the groundwater and surface water available to satisfy the City's appropriative rights is provided in Appendix C for reference. Table 5.1 Factors Resulting in Inconsistency of Supply (Guidebook Table 29) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Specific Water Supply Source Limitation Environ- Water Sources Name Quantification Legal mental Quality Climatic Surface Water, Russian 14,480 AF Change None None None Permit 12952 River to (Application Underflow Permit 15704)2 Surface Water, Russian 2,027 AF None None None None Pre -1914 rights River Groundwater Ukiah None None None None None Valley Project Water Russian 800 AF Change None None None River to Contract Recycled Water Ukiah TBD None None None None Wastewater Treatment Plant Notes: 1. "Guidebook Table V refers to a specific table in the "Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan" by DWR. 2. Permit 12952 (Al 5704) authorizes diversion of 20 CFS, with no annual limit. As a practical matter, if peak demand is 20 CFS, annual total diversion distributed according to current use patterns would result in a total diversion of approximately 8,700 AF. However, the City's water right is valid for the 14,480 AF as reported above. 3. The City is currently developing a Recycled Water Master Plan, which will include an evaluation of the projected uses and limitations for recycled water use in the City. A fundamental factor that affects water supply reliability is the hydraulic capacity of supply and distribution system facilities (e.g., groundwater wells, treatment facilities, transmission mains). As the City continues to grow, it will construct the additional supply and distribution system facilities necessary to accommodate the increased water demands associated with June 2011 5-2 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 this growth. For this reason, the physical capacity of the City's supply facilities is assumed to not be a limiting factor affecting the reliability of the City's supply in the future, as is not listed in Table 5.1. 5.1.2.1 Legal Factors The legal factors affecting supply reliability can be divided into two categories based on the City's supply sources: legal factors affecting groundwater reliability and legal factors affecting surface water availability. Currently, the legal presumption pertaining to groundwater is that all well water that the City pumps is percolating groundwater. The City will make a determination regarding whether future wells require an appropriative water rights permit using applicable legal standards and the available data. Water rights permits, if appropriate, would be obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) after all applicable requirements are met. Historically, State Division of Water Rights staff has generally accepted that existing Well 4 pumps groundwater. City Wells 7 and 8 are also presumed to pump groundwater; however, in the event of an evidentiary finding, the City has named Wells 7 and 8 as proposed points of diversion in its current petition before the State Water Board. Pertaining to surface water, the City's Water Right Permit 12952 expired on December 31, 2000. The City has filed a Petition for Extension of Time with the State Water Board; the Permit is still valid while the Petition for Extension of Time is processed. The City is preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) in support of its application for an extension of time and the City's pending Petitions to change its points of diversion and place of use. The initial study is complete, and the project description is tentatively approved. The City is currently proceeding with preparation of the administrative draft EIR. The City's existing permit and pre -1914 right to divert from the Russian River provide a reliable supply source, which is unlikely to be interrupted due to legal factors, as illustrated above. More information on the legal factors affecting groundwater and surface water reliability can be found in Appendix C. 5.1.2.2 Environmental Factors Environmental factors affecting water supply reliability typically include concerns over protection of ecosystems, particularly for fish and wildlife resources. To date, the City's groundwater supply has not been impacted by any environmental factors, and the City does not anticipate future disruption of groundwater supply as a result of environmental factors. Similarly, the City does not anticipate disruption of surface water supply as a result of environmental factors due to existing regulation of flow rates in the Russian River. The City's 2005 UWMP included an analysis of water availability under a variety of surface water supply scenarios, including a reduction in Eel River imports. The model, prepared by June 2011 5-3 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Wagner and Bonsignore, was updated in 2010 as part of the City's ongoing El analysis The results of the model indicate that, given the current regulatory parameters, surface water is available for diversion by the City; this report is included within Appendix C. 5.1.2.3 Water Qualitv Factors Water quality issues are not anticipated to have significant impact on water supply reliability. Unforeseen future occurrences of chemical contamination or the lowering of maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for naturally -occurring constituents can be mitigated with proper treatment. If water quality becomes an issue for water supply reliability in the future, the City will evaluate the need for upgrades to its current treatment system or construction of a new water treatment facility. In the future, the City will take the steps necessary to comply with all existing and future groundwater quality regulations and to continue to provide reliable water service to its residents. 5.1.2.4 Climatic Factors Climatic factors affecting the reliability of a given water supply system generally are a function of seasonal precipitation and runoff characteristics. The Ukiah area receives an average of 36.5 inches of precipitation a year, as measured by the DWR "Ukiah" gage near the City. The relatively abundant precipitation contributes runoff to the Russian River system and recharges the groundwater basin. During drought conditions, when surface water supplies are limited or unavailable, water supply is available to the City from the groundwater storage basin. Chapter 4 describes the historical and projected characteristics of the groundwater basin and supply sources underlying the City. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the City's supply reliability would be inhibited by climatic factors, as the groundwater basin can support the City's demand during below-average precipitation periods. 5.2 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING The UWMPA requires that the UWMP include an urban water shortage contingency analysis that addresses specified issues. Law 10632 (a). (Describe) stages of action to be undertaken by the urban water supplier in response to water supply shortages, including up to a 50 percent reduction in water supply, and an outline of specific water supply conditions which are applicable to each stage. 10632 (c). Actions to be undertaken by the urban water supplier to prepare for, and implement during, a catastrophic interruption of water supplies including, but not limited to, a regional power outage, an earthquake, or other disaster. 10632 (d). Additional, mandatory prohibitions against specific water use practices during June 2011 5-4 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 water shortages, including, but not limited to, prohibiting the use of potable water for street cleaning. 10632 (e). Consumption reduction methods in the most restrictive stages. Each urban water supplier may use any type of consumption reduction methods in its water shortage contingency analysis that would reduce water use, are appropriate for its area, and have the ability to achieve a water use reduction consistent with up to a 50 percent reduction in water supply. 10632 (f). Penalties or charges for excessive use, where applicable. 10632 (g). An analysis of the impacts of each of the actions and conditions described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, on the revenues and expenditures of the urban water supplier, and proposed measures to overcome those impacts, such as the development of reserves and rate adjustments. 10632 (h). A draft water shortage contingency resolution or ordinance. 10632 (i). (Provide) a mechanism for determining actual reductions in water use pursuant to the urban water shortage contingency analysis. In 1977, the City of Ukiah adopted a Water Shortage Emergency Plan (see Appendix F), which recognized the possibility of long or short-term water shortages. The ordinance is intended to prohibit all nonessential water uses, and to allocate the available water supply during any water shortage emergency. The City passed a resolution in 2009 which declared a state of local emergency pursuant to the Emergency Services Act and a Stage I water emergency under section 3602 of the City's Municipal Code (Appendix G). The City's declaration of this Stage I water emergency (described in the next section) was initiated in response to the drought of 2009, which occurred as a result of below-average rainfall and reduced storage in Lake Mendocino. Emergency situations have also been declared as a result of problems with water treatment or distribution facilities. The City has been able to manage these emergency situations by restricting the watering of City parks and landscaped areas. Notification of any water shortage emergency condition in the City will follow the guidelines set forth in the City's Water Shortage Emergency Plan. The City will first notify local authorities, radio, newspaper, and television media to inform them of the current status of the emergency. If needed, the City will contact neighboring water districts for mutual aid. If no other means is available, the City will notify customers on a house-to-house basis of the emergency and what voluntary or mandatory measures need to be implemented. 5.2.1 Stages of Action and Reduction Objectives The Water Shortage Emergency Plan adopted by the City describes three stages of rationing that will be invoked during declared water shortages. Each stage includes a water reduction objective, in percent of normal water demands. The rationing plan is dependent on the cause, severity, and anticipated duration of the water supply shortage. A June 2011 5-5 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 combination of voluntary and mandatory water conservation measures would be used to reduce water usage in the event of water shortages. Table 5.2 shows the three stages and their representative shortages. Table 5.2 Water Shortage Contingency - Rationing Stages (Guidebook Table 35) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Stage Condition Reduction Objective I - Minor Shortage • Below average rainfall in the previous 10-20% reduction in total Potential 12-24 months water demands from • 10 percent or more of municipal wells baseline out of service • Warm weather patterns typical of summer months 11 - Moderate • Below average rainfall in the previous 20-35% reduction in total Shortage 24-36 months water demands from Potential • Prolonged periods of low water baseline pressure • 10 percent or more of municipal wells out of service • Warm weather typical of summer months III - Critical • Below average rainfall in the previous 35-50% reduction in total Shortage 36 months water demands from Potential • Prolonged periods of low water baseline pressure • 10 percent or more of municipal wells out of service • Warm weather patterns typical of summer months Emergency response stage actions become effective when the City Manager declares that the City is unable to provide sufficient water supply to meet ordinary demands, to the extent that insufficient supplies would be available for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection. The declaration will be based on his/her judgment as to the degree of the immediate or future supply deficiency. The City is responsible for supplying water for the health and safety needs of the community. If it appears the City may be unable to supply the normal demands and requirements of the water customers, the City Council may, by resolution, declare a water emergency. Based on the severity of the predicted shortage, the City will take the following actions: June 2011 5-6 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Stage I: Voluntary Restrictions. When the City Council declares that a Stage I water shortage exists, the City will issue a proclamation urging citizens to institute water conservation measures on a voluntary basis. Stage II: Nonessential Water Use. When the City Council declares that a Stage II water shortage exists, the City will institute mandatory water conservation measures. The City's Municipal Code includes prohibition on use such as: fire hydrant use restrictions; exterior irrigation restrictions; requirements for correction of leaks, breaks or malfunctions within a user's plumbing system; restrictions on washing cars, boats, buildings, and mobile homes; restrictions on washing of sidewalks, driveways, and other hard surfaced areas; restriction on filling swimming pools; and restrictions of potable water use for dust control purposes. Stage III: Further Nonessential Water Use. All of the mandatory Stage II water use restrictions will continue to be enforced when the City Council declares a Stage III water shortage exists. In addition to the Stage II restrictions, the City will implement the following measures: daily usage allotment of 50 gallons per permanent resident for single family or duplex and 45 gallons per permanent resident for multi -residential units, all other uses will be limited to fifty percent of prior water use for a similar period, restriction on irrigation water, and restrictions for hand -watering. 5.2.1.1 Administration of Water Shortage Program The administration of a water shortage program would involve coordination among a number of City departments. It is anticipated that the Public Works Department would have primary responsibility for managing the program, since it is responsible for the City's water system. An individual in the Public Works Department would be identified as the Program Manager and be the primary coordinator of water shortage activities. An appropriate organizational structure for water shortage management team would be determined based on the actual situation. Specific individuals would be designated to fill the identified roles. The City would probably not have to hire additional staff or outside contractors to implement the program. The major elements to be considered in administering and implementing the program include: Identifying the City staff members to fill the key roles on the water shortage management team. It is anticipated that the Public Works Director would designate the appropriate individuals, including the Program Manager. Intensifying the public information program to provide comprehensive information on the water shortage and necessary actions that must be undertaken by the City and by the public. The scope of the public information program can be developed by reviewing published references, especially those published by the Department of Water Resources (DWR), and researching successful June 2011 5-7 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 aspects of the current programs conducted by neighboring water agencies. A public information hotline may be advisable to answer any questions regarding the program. Monitoring program effectiveness. Ongoing monitoring will be needed to track supply availability and actual water user reductions. This procedure will allow the City to continuously re-evaluate the situation and make informal decisions as to whether another reduction level is needed. Enforcing program requirements. From the 35 to 50 percent reduction programs, enforcement of water use prohibitions and water use allocations will be more important in achieving the program goals. Inspectors and enforcement personnel could be identified among City staff that is in the community on other business, such as police, street maintenance, meter readers, etc. Dealing with equity issues that might arise from the mandatory restrictions or higher water rates. Depending on the level of restriction, there may be a greater need to address specific concerns of individual customers who might have special conditions or extenuating circumstances and are unduly affected by the program. A procedure should be identified for dealing with such special requests and/or for reviewing specific accounts. Coordinating with surrounding water districts. A groundwater shortage supply for the City would likely affect regional groundwater supplies as well. Therefore, if the City is forced to declare a water shortage emergency, surrounding water districts may also be affected. Under the influence of a water shortage situation where the water shortage contingency plan must be implemented, it is critical that the City coordinate its water conservation efforts with surrounding water districts. Adjusting water rates. Revenues from water sales should be reviewed periodically to determine whether an increase in rates might be needed to cover revenue shortfalls due to the decrease in demand. Addressing new development proposals. During periods of severe water shortage, it may be necessary to impose additional requirements on new development to reduce new demand or to temporarily curtail new service connections. 5.2.2 Actions during a Catastrophic Interruption The City has described its emergency response plan in Division 6, Chapter 2 — Emergency Services of the City of Ukiah City Municipal Code. Table 5.3 describes the types of catastrophes considered in the Municipal Code. The City has developed an extensive response plan and has organized its emergency efforts with applicable relief agencies and municipalities in the area. June 2011 5-8 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Table 5.3 Catastrophe Actions Discussed in City Municipal Code 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Type of Catastrophe Discussed in Emergency Services Municipal Code Air pollution Yes Fire Yes Flood Yes Storm Yes Epidemic Yes Earthquake Yes Power Outages No War Yes Hazardous materials Yes Environmental disaster Yes 5.2.3 Mandatory Prohibitions on Water Wasting Mandatory compliance measures enacted during a water shortage are more severe than voluntary measures, produce greater savings, and are less costly to the utility. The principal drawback to these measures is the customer resentment if the measures are not seen as equitable. Therefore, such measures should be accompanied by a good public relations campaign. Mandatory measures may include: • Ordinances making water waste illegal • Ordinances controlling landscape irrigation • Ordinances restricting non -irrigation outdoor water uses • Prohibitions on new connections or the incorporation of new areas • Rationing The City's Municipal Code includes prohibition on various wasteful water uses during a declared water shortage emergency. These mandatory prohibitions are implemented during a Stage II or Stage III water shortage emergency and are listed in Table 5.4. June 2011 5-9 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Table 5.4 Water Shortage Contingency - Mandatory Prohibitions (Guidebook Table 36) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Mandatory Prohibitions Prohibition Stage Use of water from public hydrants for any other purpose than fire 11, 111 protection/prevention Use of water through any meter when the consumer has been given 11, 111 2 days notice to repair any leaks and has failed to complete repairs Use of water by golf course to irrigate any grounds except those 11, 111 designated as tees and greens Use of water to irrigate grass, lawns, ground cover, shrubbery, II, III vegetable gardens, trees, or other outdoor vegetation Use of water for the construction of any structure including such use II, III in dust control Use of water to wash sidewalk , driveway, street, parking lot, tennis II, III court, or other hard surface area by hosing or by other direct use of water from faucets or other outlets Use of water to fill or refill any swimming pool II, III Use of water to add to any swimming pool not equipped with and II, III using a pool cover Use of water to wash any motor vehicle, trailer, airplane, or boat by II, III hosing or otherwise using water directly from a faucet or other outlet. Use of water in excess of the daily usage allotment set forth as: III • Single family or duplex - 50 gallons per permanent resident • Multi -residential units - 45 gallons per permanent resident All other uses not expressed above shall be limited to 50 percent of III prior use for a similar period as determined by the City from its records Water to irrigate III Use of water for hand watering III 5.2.4 Consumption Reduction Methods in Most Restrictive Stage In order to achieve a 50 percent reduction in water use during the most restrictive stage of a water supply emergency, the City will implement and enforce the water prohibitions described in Section 5.2.3. Other mandated restrictions in water use for all reductions stages, including Stage 3, will be determined by the City Council, and may include the actions described in Table 5.5. The reduction methods described in Table 5.5 are potential June 2011 5-10 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 reduction methods that the City could implement if faced with an extreme water shortage situation. It should be noted that the City has never experienced a critical water shortage situation where Stages II or III have imposed required restrictions on water customers. In its 2009 drought resolution, however, the City did direct the City Manager to encourage a voluntary Russian River water conservation goal of 50 percent. According to the City's 2009 Annual Water Quality Report (Appendix H), the water conservation program and community as a whole were able to reduce water consumption by 35 percent over the summer months and 20 percent for the entire year. 5.2.5 Excessive Use Penalties Any customer violating the regulations and restrictions on water use receives a written warning from the City for the first violation. If the violation continues and the Director determines there has been a "willful failure to comply" with the regulations, the City may shut off a customer's water service. Table 5.6 lists the specifics of these charges and in what stages they may occur. 5.2.6 Revenue and Expenditure Impacts/Measures to Overcome Impacts The majority of operating costs for most water agencies are fixed rather than a function of the amount of water sold. As a result, when significant conservation programs are undertaken, it is frequently necessary to raise water rates because the revenue generated is based on lower total consumption while the revenue required is basically fixed. To date, the City has not experienced shortages where it has implemented mandatory restrictions or prohibitions. In the Association of Bay Area Governments 2005 Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series A (2005), a rate stabilization fund was establish to allow the City to use money within this fund during a period of decreased revenue or increased expenditures until the City can implement a rate increase. In this case, the City could increase its rates as a measure to overcome revenue impacts. Table 5.7 describes the measures to overcome revenue impacts that have been discussed by the City. June 2011 5-11 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Table 5.5 Water Shortage Contingency - Consumption Reduction Methods (Guidebook Table 37) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Stage When Projected Method Takes Reduction (2) Reduction Method Description Effect(') M Prohibit or eliminate watering of ornamental turf areas, Stage 1 - 3 Up to 50 actively -used turf areas, trees, and shrubs. Limit number of watering events per week. May include Stage 1 - 3 Up to 50 prescription of hand-held hoses with positive shutoff nozzle or drip irrigation systems. Prohibits or eliminates sprinkler use. Restrict use of potable water for construction purposes. Stage 1 - 3 Up to 50 Require use of reclaimed or non -potable water for application to construction sites. Require certification that a reduction of the projected Stage 1 - 3 Up to 50 average water usage for development of construction projects shall be achieved. Notes: 1. Consumption reduction measures will be implemented by the City as appropriate given the nature of the water supply shortage. 2. Projected reductions, in concept, should be capable of achieving a system -wide reduction of 50 percent. Table 5.6 Water Shortage Contingency - Penalties and Charges (Guidebook Table 38) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Stage When Penalty Penalty/Charge Takes Effect Penalty for use beyond restrictions as described in Stages II II, III and III Penalty for use of water for prohibited (non-essential) uses II, III described in Table 5.4 Table 5.7 Proposed Measures to Overcome Revenue Impacts 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Measures Discussed? Rate adjustment Yes Development of reserves Yes Reserve Fund Yes June 2011 5-12 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 5.2.7 Water Shortage Contingency Ordinance/Resolution The City adopted its water shortage emergency plan in 1977. A copy of the adopted resolution is included in Appendix F. 5.2.8 Reduction Measuring Mechanism The City's primary mechanism of measuring water use and, subsequently, water use reduction, is through the use of water meters. Therefore, to measure actual reductions in water use in the course of carrying out a water supply shortage contingency plan, the City will perform frequent water meter readings for individual connections. 5.3 WATER QUALITY The UWMPA requires that the UWMP include a discussion of the water quality impacts on an agency's supply reliability. Law 10634. The plan shall include information, to the extent practicable, relating to the quality of existing sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments as described in subdivision (a) of Section 10631, and the manner in which water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability. This section describes the impacts of water quality on the City's water supply sources. 5.3.1 Improvement Projects The City's Water Treatment Plant (WTP) was constructed and began operation in April 1992, and treats water collected in the Ranney Collector. The WTP, located about 300 feet from the Ranney Collector, uses a Microfloc contact clarification -filtration technology to treat collected water. Treatment processes include prechlori nation, adsorption, clarification, mixed -media gravity filtration, and disinfection. Treated water is pumped to a 1.5 million gallon (MG) clearwell for post -chlorination. After chlorination, water from the surface water and percolated groundwater well is pumped directly into the distribution system. Improvements to the WTP were completed in September 2006. The improvements included an additional Microfloc contact clarification -filtration unit for reliability and redundancy, new chlorine scrubber, new sodium hydroxide tank and dispensing system, new water distribution SCADA system, and high service pumps. 5.3.2 Water Quality Impacts Summary The quality of the City's water system is regulated by the Department of Public Health (DPH), which requires regular collection and testing of water samples to ensure that the water quality meets regulatory standards and does not exceed MCLs. The City performs water quality testing, which has consistently met or exceeded regulatory standards. June 2011 5-13 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 The quality of existing surface water and percolated groundwater supply sources over the next 25 years is expected to be adequate. Surface water will continue to be treated to drinking water standards, and no surface water or groundwater quality deficiencies are expected. Table 5.8 below summarizes the current and projected water supply changes due to water quality. The City has a Water Quality Emergency Notification Plan (Notification Plan) for use when an imminent danger to the health of the water consumers exists. Within the Notification Plan, City staff is directed to contact local authorities, radio stations, television stations, and newspapers. If necessary, City makes door-to-door notifications during the hours that other media sources are not available to broadcast a warning. Table 5.8 Water Quality - Current and Projected Water Supply Impacts (Guidebook Table 30) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Potential Supply Impacts (AFY) Description of Water Source Condition 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Russian River None 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Water None 0 0 0 0 0 0 Groundwater None 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recycled Water None 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.4 DROUGHT PLANNING The UWMPA requires that an UWMP include water supply and demand projections for normal, single -dry year, and multiple -dry years. Law 10631 (c) (1). Describe the reliability of the water supply and vulnerability to seasonal or climatic shortage, to the extent practicable, and provide data for each of the following: (A) an average water year, (8) a single dry water year, (C) multiple dry water years. 10632 (b). (Provide) an estimate of the minimum water supply available during each of the next three water years based on the driest three-year historic sequence for the agency's water supply. 10635 (a). Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years. This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and multiple dry water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, including available data from state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier. June 2011 5-14 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 This section considers the City's water supply reliability during three climate -related water scenarios: normal water year, single dry water year, and multiple dry water years. These scenarios are defined by DWR as follows: Normal Year: The normal year is a year or an averaged range of years in the historical sequence that most closely represents median runoff levels and patterns. It is defined as the median runoff over the previous 30 years or more. Single Dry Year: This is defined as the year with the minimum useable supply. The supply quantities for this condition are derived from the minimum historical annual yield. Multiple Dry Years: This is defined as the three consecutive years with the minimum useable supply. Water systems are more vulnerable to these droughts of long duration, because they deplete water storage reserves in local and state reservoirs and in groundwater basins. The supply quantities for this condition are derived from the minimum of historical three-year running average yields. 5.4.1 Basis of Water Year Data Historical rainfall data available for Ukiah were examined to establish a basis of water year for normal, single dry, and multiple dry years. As shown in Table 5.9, for the purposes of this report, the year 1962 is classified as a "normal" year, the average of years 1976 and 1977 is classified as a "single dry" year, and the years 1990 to 1992 are classified as "multiple dry" years. Table 5.9 Basis of Water Year Data (Guidebook Table 27) 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Year Type Base Year(s) Average Water Year 1962 Single Dry Water Year 1976-1977 Multiple Dry Water Years 1990-1992 5.4.2 Supply Reliability - Historic and Current Conditions During drought years, water use patterns will typically change. Outdoor water use will typically increase as irrigation is used as a replacement for decreased rainfall. Table 5.10 and Table 5.11 describe the water supply availability in single and multiple dry water years based on available supply during an average water year. The estimated historical water supply conditions are based on the volume of water available on the water year of 2010. The water supply conditions in 2010 reflect current supply conditions, from which future dry year supplies may be estimated. During the dry water years described in Table 5.9, the City did not experience a reduction in supply availability. June 2011 5-15 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Supply availabilities for single and multiple dry years represent a scenario in which supply is reduced up to 50 percent. This is a conservative estimate, which is consistent with the water reduction scenario provided in Section 10632 of the California Water Code. It is unlikely that the City will experience a reduction of this magnitude in groundwater or surface water supply due to legal, environmental, water quality, or climatic changes. The City's appropriative rights and the extensive groundwater storage within the Ukiah Valley groundwater basin ensure water supply reliability for the City. Table 5.10 Supply Reliability - Historical Conditions (Guidebook Table 28) 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Multiple Dry Years Average/Normal Year Single Dry Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 21,012 AF(') 10,506 AF 10,506 AF 10,506 AF 10,506 AF Percent of Average Year 50 50 50 50 Notes: 1. Based on water available in 2010, and does not include potential future supply from recycled water. Table 5.11 Supply Reliability - Current Water Source (Guidebook Table 31) 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Use (AFY) Average/ Single Multiple Dry Years Water Supply Sources Normal Year(') Dry Year 2011 2012 2013 Russian River 16,507 8,254 8,254 8,254 8,254 Project Water 800 400 400 400 400 Groundwater 3,705 1,853 1,853 1,853 1,853 Percent of Average Year 100 50 50 50 50 Notes: 1. Based on available water supply sources for 2010, and does not include future potential recycled water supply. 5.4.3 Projected Normal Year Supply/Demand The projected normal water year water supply and demand projections are provided in Table 5.12. June 2011 5-16 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Table 5.12 Supply and Demand Comparison - Normal Year (Guidebook Table 32) 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Supply/Demand Condition Supply Totals (from Guidebook Table 16) Demand totals (from Guidebook Table 11) Supply and Demand Difference Difference as Percent of Supply Difference as Percent of Demand Projected Supply/Demand (AFY) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 21,615 21,895 22,175 22,735 23,295 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 17,767 18,300 18,397 18,764 19,122 82 84 83 83 82 462 509 487 473 458 5.4.4 Projected Single Dry Year Supply/Demand The projected single dry year water demands through 2035 are estimated based on the normal year demands and a 50 percent supply reduction scenario. The projected single dry water year supplies and demands are presented in Table 5.13. Table 5.13 Supply and Demand Comparison - Single Dry Year (Guidebook Table 33) 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Projected Supply/Demand (AFY) Supply/Demand Condition 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Supply Totals (from Guidebook Table 16) 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 Demand totals (From Guidebook Table 11) 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 Supply and Demand Difference 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 Difference as Percent of Supply 64 67 66 65 64 Difference as Percent of Demand 181 205 193 186 179 Notes: 1. Assumes a maximum 50 percent reduction in available supply during dry years. 5.4.5 Projected Multiple Dry Year Supply/Demand The projected multiple dry year water demands through 2035 are estimated based on the normal year demands and a 50 percent supply reduction scenario. The projected multiple dry water year supplies and demands are presented in Table 5.14. Because maximum 50 percent reduction of supplies is already assumed, supplies and demands are not expected to decrease further between the years of a multiple dry year event. June 2011 5-17 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Table 5.14 Supply and Demand Comparison - Multiple Dry Year Events (Guidebook Table 34) 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Year Supply/Demand Condition >, ISupply Totals 0- 9- Q Demand totals U) Supply and Demand Difference CU a) >- Difference as Percent of Supply Difference as Percent of Demand :1 Supply Totals 0- 0- Q Demand totals Supply and Demand Difference CU a) > Difference as Percent of Supply a Difference as Percent of Demand Supply Totals Demand totals Supply and Demand Difference CU a) > Difference as Percent of Supply a CO Difference as Percent of Demand Projected Supply/Demand (AFY) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 64 67 66 65 64 181 205 193 186 179 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 64 67 66 65 64 181 205 193 186 179 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 64 67 66 65 64 181 205 193 186 179 1. Assumes a maximum 50 percent reduction in available supply during dry years. June 2011 5-18 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch05 Chapter 6 DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) identifies 14 Demand Management Measures (DMMs) for urban water suppliers to address. These measures are derived from the original Best Management Practices (BMPs) established in the UWMPA and the 1991 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Law 10631 (f) (1) and (2). (Describe and provide a schedule of implementation for) each water demand management measure that is currently being implemented, or scheduled for implementation, including the steps necessary to implement any proposed measures, including, but not limited to, all of the following: (A) water survey programs for single-family residential and multifamily residential customers; (8) residential plumbing retrofit; (C) system water audits, leak detection, and repair; (D) metering with commodity rates for all new connections and retrofit of existing connections; (E) large landscape conservation programs and incentives; (F) high -efficiency washing machine rebate programs; (G) public information programs; (H) school education programs; (1) conservation programs for commercial, industrial, and institutional accounts; (J) wholesale agency programs; (K) conservation pricing; (L) water conservation coordinator; (M) water waste prohibition; (N) residential ultra- low flush toilet replacement programs. 10631 (f) (3). (Provide) a description of the methods, if any, that the supplier will use to evaluate the effectiveness of water demand management measures implemented or described under the plan. 10631 (f) (4). (Provide) an estimate, if available, of existing conservation savings on water use within the supplier's service area, and the effect of the savings on the supplier's ability to further reduce demand. 10631 (g). (Provide) an evaluation of each water demand management measure listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) that is not currently being implemented or scheduled for implementation. In the course of the evaluation, first consideration shall be given to water demand management measures, or combination of measures, that offer lower incremental costs than expanded or additional water supplies. This evaluation shall do all of the following: (1) Take into account economic and noneconomic factors, including environmental, social, health, customer impact, and technological factors; (2) Include a cost - benefit analysis, identifying total benefits and total costs; (3) Include a description of funding available to implement any planned water supply project that would provide water at a higher unit cost; (4) Include a description of the water supplier's legal authority to implement the measure and efforts to work with other relevant agencies to ensure the implementation of the measure and to share the cost of implementation. In 1991 (amended September 16, 1999), an MOU regarding urban water conservation in California was made that formalizes an agreement between Department of Water Resources (DWR), water utilities, environmental organizations, and other interested groups to implement DMMs and make a cooperative effort to reduce the consumption of California's water resources. This MOU is administered by the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC). The City of Ukiah (City) is not currently a signatory of the MOU and is therefore not a member of CUWCC. June 2011 6-1 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 However, the City realizes the importance of the BMPs to ensure a reliable future water supply. The City is committed to implementing water conservation and water recycling programs to maximize sustainability in meeting future water needs for its customers. Due to the continued effective water conservation measures implemented by the City, the 2010 per -capita water use has dropped to roughly 168 gallons per capita per day (gpcd), from 208 gpcd in 2008 and 231 gpcd in 2004. The DMMs described hereafter fall into one of four categories (Table 6.1). In the City's case, the 14 DMMs required for discussion by DWR are either implemented, not implemented, or not applicable. The City does not have any upcoming plans to implement new DMMs. For the DMMs that have already been implemented, the City continually assesses the success of its programs and makes changes to the organization and/or operation of the conservation measures as appropriate. 6.1 DMM 1 - WATER SURVEY PROGRAMS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS This program consists of annual water audits, water use surveys, and surveys of past program participants. Audits are conducted by trained auditors and may include low -flow device installation. Audits identify water use problems, recommend improvements, provide instruction in landscape principles and irrigation timer use, and identify indoor and outdoor leaks. 6.1.1 Implementation Status The City does not have an established survey program for single-family and multi -family residences. Establishment of a water survey program is not being considered at this time. 6.1.2 Cost Benefit Analysis The City is not currently implementing this DMM. An economic analysis was performed on this DMM and is included in Appendix I, which is summarized in Table 6.2. The economic analysis performed considered the relative benefits of implementing this DMM from an agency perspective and from a society perspective. The difference in net program costs often results from additional customer program costs, accounted for under the society perspective estimates. June 2011 6-2 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 Table 6.1 Demand Management Measures 2005 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Cost Effective Demand Planning to Analysis Not Management Measure Implemented Implement Completed Applicable DMM 1 - Water Survey [� Programs(l) DMM 2 - Residential Plumbing [� Retrofit(' DMM 3 - Water System Audits [� DMM 4 - Metering with [� Commodity Rates DMM 5 - Landscape Irrigation [� Programs DMM 6 -Washing Machine [� Rebate Program(l) DMM 7 - Public Information [� DMM 8 - School Education [� DMM 9 - Commercial, Industrial [� & Institutional Programs DMM 10 -Wholesale Agency [� Programs DMM 11 - Conservation Pricing [� DMM 12 - Water Conservation [� Coordinator DMM 13 -Water Waste [� Prohibition DMM 14 - Ultra Low Flush Toilet Replacement(2) Notes: 1. These programs have not been implemented by the City. Therefore, a cost/benefit analysis of these DMMs is required. 2. Although this program is being implemented to an extent, there is possibility for the expansion of this program. Therefore, a cost benefit analysis was performed for this DMM. As shown in Table 6.2, the benefit/cost ratios for this DMM from an agency perspective and society perspective are 0.05 and 0.06, respectively. This indicates that this conservation measure is not justified from a cost perspective, and that the City may not consider its implementation in the near future. June 2011 6-3 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienYCAMkiah/8660B00/Del iverables/Ch06 Table 6.2 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 1 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Simple Net Total Net Unit Discounted Program Water Present Supply Unit Supply Cost Saved (2) Value Cost Cost Benefit/Cost Perspective ($) (AF) ($) ($/AF) ($/AF) Ratio Agency 35,264 9.9 (33,329) 3,568 3,827 0.05 Perspective Society 42,164 9.9 (39,764) 4,266 4,515 0.06 Perspective Notes: 1. Numbers in parentheses indicated negative numbers. 2. Total water saved represents the total water savings over a 25 -year period. 6.1.3 Economic/Non-Economic Factors There are certain advantages that could be realized by performing residential water audits, including a reduction in the amount of groundwater pumped by the City and an opportunity to characterize water use practices of the City residents. However, implementation of this DMM would require staff time and resources be allocated to a program that would likely provide little benefit to the City on a cost basis. 6.1.4 Legal Authority This DMM is a survey program that could be implemented by the City. The City has the legal authority to implement this DMM; however, it has chosen not to. 6.2 DMM 2 - RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING RETROFIT This program consists of installing physical devices to reduce the amount of water used or to limit the amount of water, which can be served to the customer. This includes working with local programs and businesses to offer free water conservation information and materials to residents. In accordance with State Law, low -flow fixtures have been required on all new construction since 1978. In addition, State legislation enacted in 1990 requires all new buildings after January 1, 1992 to install Ultra Low Flush Toilets (ULFT). Several studies suggest that savings resulting from miscellaneous interior retrofit fixtures can range between 25 and 65 gpd per housing unit. The studies also suggest that installation of retrofit fixtures in older single-family homes tend to produce more savings, while newer multi -family homes tend to produce fewer saving per housing unit. June 2011 6-4 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 6.2.1 Implementation Status The City has offered water savings kits in the past. However, due to lack of interest by customers, the City has discontinued this program. 6.2.2 Cost Benefit Analysis The City is not currently implementing this DMM. An economic analysis was performed on this DMM and is included in Appendix I, which is summarized in Table 6.3. The economic analysis performed considered the relative benefits of implementing this DMM from an agency perspective and from a society perspective. The difference in net program costs often results from additional customer program costs, accounted for under the society perspective estimates. Table 6.3 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 2 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Simple Net Total Net Unit Discounted Program Water Present Supply Unit Supply Cost Saved (2) Value Cost Cost Benefit/Cost Perspective ($) (AF) ($) ($/AF) ($/AF) Ratio Agency 36,875 8.6 (35,127) 4,272 4,429 0.05 Perspective Society 36,875 8.6 (34,720) 4,272 4,398 0.06 Perspective Notes: 1. Numbers in parentheses indicated negative numbers. 2. Total water saved represents the total water savings over a 25 -year period. As shown in Table 6.3, the benefit/cost ratios for this DMM from an agency perspective and society perspective are 0.05 and 0.06, respectively. This indicates that this conservation measure is not justified from a cost perspective, and that the City may not consider its implementation in the near future. 6.2.3 Economic/Non-Economic Factors There are certain advantages that could be realized by offering residential plumbing retrofit kits to City residents, primarily a reduction in the amount of groundwater pumped by the City. However, implementation of this DMM would require staff time and resources be allocated to a program that would likely provide little benefit to the City on a cost basis. 6.2.4 Legal Authority The City does not have an enforceable ordinance in effect requiring replacement of high-flow showerheads and other water use fixtures with low -flow fixtures; therefore, the June 2011 6-5 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 City does not have the legal authority to require that these water -conserving fixtures be installed. 6.3 DMM 3 - SYSTEM WATER AUDITS, LEAK DETECTION, AND REPAIR A water audit is a process of accounting for water use throughout a water system in order to quantify the unaccounted-for water. Unaccounted-for water is the difference between metered production and metered consumption on a system -wide basis. A leak detection program typically consists of both visual inspection as well as audible inspection. Visual inspection includes the inspection of distribution system appurtenances (e.g., fire hydrants, valves, meters, etc.) to identify obvious signs of leakage. To perform audible leak detection, specialized electronic listening equipment is used to detect the sounds associated with distribution system leakage. This process allows the agency to pinpoint the location of suspected leaks. 6.3.1 Implementation Status The City currently performs leak detection and repair on an ongoing basis. Because the City was fully metered in 2005, its system water audit program is thorough and represents an accurate estimate of water system losses. The City calculates system water losses annually and reports this information to DWR. In addition to calculating system losses, the City is in the process of replacing old meters in the system. New meters will provide a more comprehensive portrayal of water use within the City. 6.3.2 Steps Necessary to Implement To implement this DMM, the City manages an ongoing water system audit program. Steps necessary to implement this DMM include: • Tracking metered production and delivery values over time to evaluate system losses; • Compilation of annual report to DWR with unaccounted-for water losses in the system; • Training staff on system -wide auditing procedures; • Visual and measured inspection of meter and conveyance infrastructure; • Replacement of older meters with new meters; • Ongoing calibration of water meters to ensure accuracy. 6.3.3 Implementation Schedule The water system audits and leak detection activities are performed on an ongoing, year-round basis. June 2011 6-6 pwJ/Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 6.3.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness It is through the City's annual report to the DWR that the system water audit program is evaluated for effectiveness. The annual report monitors the unaccounted-for water losses in the system. Any reductions in water loss due to the replacement of old meters and water leak detection and repairs will be reflected in the annual report. The City does not record the number of miles of distribution lines surveyed, nor the expenditures. 6.4 DMM 4 - METERING WITH COMMODITY RATES FOR ALL NEW CONNECTIONS AND RETROFIT OF EXISTING CONNECTIONS This DMM requires water meters for all new construction and billing by volume of use, as well as establishing a program for retrofitting any existing unmetered connections. 6.4.1 Implementation Status The City has implemented this DMM. The City's water distribution system is fully metered. In addition, the City is in the process of replacing old meters in the system to provide more accurate readings of water use in its service area. 6.4.2 Steps Necessary to Implement To implement this DMM, the City maintains its meter reading program and continually evaluates replacement of old meters in the system. The City provides support for this DMM in the way of staff time and City resources. 6.4.3 Implementation Schedule The City will continue to install and read meters on all new services and will replace aging meters on an ongoing, year-round basis. 6.4.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness Effectiveness of this DMM will be evaluated by comparison of prior water use to future water use. The City does not record number of meter retrofits. However, the City recently restructured its rate schedule in an effort to reduce water use in the future. The City's water rate structure includes both a fixed meter charge and a consumption charge, as shown in Table 6.4. June 2011 6-7 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 Table 6.4 Proposed Water Rate Schedule 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Year Type of Charge 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Meter Size 3/4" Meter $15.24 $22.71 $26.11 $28.46 $31.31 $32.25 1" Meter $25.90 $38.59 $44.38 $48.37 $53.21 $54.81 1 1/2" Meter $50.28 $74.92 $86.15 $93.91 $103.30 $106.40 2" Meter $80.75 $120.32 $138.37 $150.82 $165.90 $170.88 3" Meter $152.36 $227.02 $261.07 $284.57 $313.02 $322.41 4" Meter $254.45 $379.13 $436.00 $475.24 $522.76 $538.45 6" & Up $507.37 $755.98 $869.38 $947.62 $1,042.38 $1,073.66 Fire Service 2" & $16.15 $24.06 $27.67 $30.16 $33.18 $34.18 Under Fire Service 3" $30.47 $45.40 $52.21 $56.91 $62.60 $64.48 Meter Fire Service 4" $50.89 $75.83 $87.20 $95.05 $104.55 $107.69 Meter Fire Service 6" & $101.47 $151.19 $173.87 $189.52 $208.47 $214.72 Up Consumption Rate $/Unit(') $1.29 $1.90 $2.21 $2.41 $2.65 $2.73 Notes: 1. Unit = hundred cubic feet or 748 gallons. 6.5 DMM 5 - LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION PROGRAMS AND INCENTIVES This DMM calls for agencies to commence assigning water budgets to accounts with dedicated irrigation meters and provide water -use large landscape water audits to commercial, industrial, and institutional (CII) customers with mixed-use meters. 6.5.1 Implementation Status The City's Planning Department reviews all landscape plans for proposed new developments. Included in the City's Municipal Code is a requirement for all landscape planting to be "those which grow well in Ukiah's climate without extensive irrigation." It is through this planning review process that the City manages its large landscape water consumers to ensure responsible water use for new developments. June 2011 6-8 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 6.5.2 Steps Necessary to Implement The City's Planning Department reviews all proposed landscaping plans for new developments. During the review process, the City addresses large landscaping concerns with the developer in an effort to create landscapes that do not require extensive irrigation. New developments can only be approved once a landscaping plan that adheres to the City's Municipal Code is proposed. 6.5.3 Implementation Schedule The City evaluates the proposed landscaping plans for all new developments on an ongoing, year-round basis. All new developments are required to adhere to the landscaping ordinances of City's Municipal Code. 6.5.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The City has very few CII accounts and does not track the water use for large landscape consumers. Therefore, the City has not historically tracked the actual water savings associated with the implementation of this DMM. The City has not established other methods of evaluate the effectiveness of this DMM. 6.6 DMM 6 - HIGH -EFFICIENCY WASHING MACHINE REBATE PROGRAM This program generally provides a financial incentive (rebate offer) to qualifying customers who install a high efficiency washing machine in their home. Other regional municipalities that performed an economic analysis on this program concluded that it would have a low benefit -to -cost ratio. 6.6.1 Implementation Status This program is not currently implemented in the City, and the City does not plan to implement it in the future. 6.6.2 Cost Benefit Analysis The City is not currently implementing this DMM. An economic analysis was performed on this DMM and is included in Appendix I, which is summarized in Table 6.5. The economic analysis performed considered the relative benefits of implementing this DMM from an agency perspective and from a society perspective. The difference in net program costs often results from additional customer program costs, accounted for under the society perspective estimates. June 2011 6-9 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 Table 6.5 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 6 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Simple Net Total Net Unit Discounted Program Water Present Supply Unit Supply Cost Saved (2) Value Cost Cost Benefit/Cost Perspective ($) (AF) ($) ($/AF) ($/AF) Ratio Agency 21,110 4.8 (20,364) 4,421 5,172 0.04 Perspective Society 21,110 4.8 (1,949) 4,421 5,017 0.91 Perspective Notes: 1. Numbers in parentheses indicated negative numbers. 2. Total water saved represents the total water savings over a 25 -year period. As shown in Table 6.5, the benefit/cost ratios for this DMM from an agency perspective and society perspective are 0.04 and 0.91, respectively. This indicates that this conservation measure is not justified from a cost perspective, and that the City may not consider its implementation in the near future. However, of the DMMs not yet implemented, this DMM (from a society perspective) has the highest benefit/cost ratio. The City may take this into consideration in the future when evaluating potential water conservation opportunities. 6.6.3 Economic/Non-Economic Factors There are certain advantages that could be realized by offering high efficiency washing machine rebates to City residents, including a reduction in the amount of groundwater pumped by the City and a reduction in the amount of electricity used by City residents. However, implementation of this DMM would require staff time and resources be allocated to a program that would likely provide little benefit to the City on a cost basis. 6.6.4 Legal Authority This DMM is simply a rebate program that could be implemented by the City. The City has the legal authority to implement this DMM; however, it has chosen not to. 6.7 DMM 7 - PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAMS This program consists of distributing information to the public through a variety of methods including brochures, radio and television, school presentations and videos, and web sites. 6.7.1 Implementation Status The City has implemented this DMM. The City understands that public awareness of water conservation issues is an important factor in ensuring a reliable water supply. The activities June 2011 6-10 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 performed in this program fall under the conservation budget for the City; the conservation budget is $2,000 annually. 6.7.2 Steps Necessary to Implement To implement this DMM, the City promotes public awareness of water conservation through occasional bill stuffers, distribution of its Annual Water Quality Report, radio broadcasts, and the City website. In addition, City employees are encouraged to discuss conservation measures with customers. The City continually evaluates its involvement in and development of public education programs. 6.7.3 Implementation Schedule The City provides public information programs on water conservation and other water issues on an ongoing, year-round basis. 6.7.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The City does not directly measure the effectiveness of this DMM. In general, however, more public awareness and education programs give customers increased knowledge of water conservation opportunities. 6.8 DMM 8 - SCHOOL EDUCATION PROGRAM This DMM requires water supplier to implement a school education program that includes providing educational materials and instructional assistance. 6.8.1 Implementation Status The City has implemented this DMM. The cost of this program comes from the City's conservation budget (described in Section 6.7). 6.8.2 Steps Necessary to Implement To implement this DMM, the City offers local school tours of its water treatment plant and provides materials to schools for conservation education. In addition, four science classes on public water supply are offered once a year at the local high school. 6.8.3 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The City does not directly measure the effectiveness of this DMM. In general, however, more public awareness and education programs give customers increased knowledge of water conservation opportunities. It is especially important to teach children water conservation practices and to educate them on the important aspects of safe and sustainable water provision. June 2011 6-11 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 6.9 DMM 9 - CONSERVATION PROGRAMS FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTS With this DMM, the City would develop a conservation program for CII accounts that includes water audits targeted to the top water users. This program would include surveys of past program participants to determine if audit recommendations were implemented. This program would also include incentives related to the use of efficient water -use technologies. 6.9.1 Implementation Status This DMM has been implemented by the City. 6.9.2 Steps Necessary to Implement The City has only three industrial customers, including Mendocino Brewing Company and Maverick Enterprises who make up the majority of the water use in the industrial sector. To implement this DMM, the City surveys the water usage of these industries. Any new commercial, industrial, or institutional developments will be reviewed by the City's Planning Department and must meet all requirements of the City's Municipal Code. 6.9.3 Implementation Schedule This DMM will be performed on an ongoing basis. 6.9.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The City has not historically tracked the actual water savings associated with the implementation of this DMM. The City has not established other methods of evaluate the effectiveness of this DMM. 6.10 DMM 10 -WHOLESALE AGENCY PROGRAMS This DMM applies to wholesale agencies and defines a wholesaler's role in terms of financial, technical, and programmatic assistance to its retail agencies implementing DMMs. The City is not a water wholesaler. 6.11 DMM 11 - CONSERVATION PRICING Conservation pricing requires that water rates encourage conservative water use by all customers. 6.11.1 Implementation Status The City has implemented this DMM through the development of a combination fixed/variable rate schedule which is dependent on meter size and consumption. The City's rate structure incorporates American Water Works Association demand capacity guidelines June 2011 6-12 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 so that price increases across meter size in proportion to the potential demand a customer can place on the water system. 6.11.2 Steps Necessary to Implement In 2005, the City restructured its water rate schedule to include fixed meter charges based on meter size and variable charges based on consumption (Table 6.4). These rates were updated and increased minimally in 2009, primarily to recover costs associated with water treatment and delivery with decreased consumption and subsequent reduced funding. 6.11.3 Implementation Schedule The City will continue its current rate structure through the fiscal year 2014-2015. When appropriate, City will re-evaluate its rate structure and continue to implement water pricing that encourages water conservation. 6.11.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The effectiveness of this DMM will be evaluated by comparison of City water use prior to and following the implementation of conservation pricing. The City's conservation pricing is expected to decrease overall consumption by water customers. 6.12 DMM 12 - WATER CONSERVATION COORDINATOR A conservation coordinator is an ongoing component of a City's water conservation program. The conservation coordinator is responsible for implementing and monitoring the City's water conservation activities. 6.12.1 Implementation Status The City has implemented this DMM. In practice, all City staff encourages implementation of water conservation measures by the City's residents. In particular, the Water and Sewer Division provide indoor and outdoor conservation tips for customers. However, the City intentionally calls upon the support of City staff as a whole to perform the duties that would be assigned to an individual conservation coordinator. In this way, coordination can be handled by specialized departments to achieve optimum water conservation. 6.12.2 Steps Necessary to Implement Water conservation coordination for the City is established by policies determined by the City council and includes answering questions of the public by maintenance and meter reading staff while in the field. 6.12.3 Implementation Schedule This DMM will be performed on an ongoing, year-round basis. June 2011 6-13 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 6.12.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The effectiveness of this DMM will be evaluated in conjunction with the success of the City's water conservation efforts as a whole. 6.13 DMM 13 - WATER WASTE PROHIBITION Water waste prohibition will require the City to adopt its own set of water conservation regulations. 6.13.1 Implementation Status The City has implemented this DMM and will continue to enforce the water waste ordinance in the future. The City's Municipal Code states "Where negligent or wasteful use of water exists on a customer's premises, seriously affecting the general service, the City may discontinue the service if such conditions are not corrected within five (5) days after giving customer written notice of intent to do so" (§4.1.7.3571). 6.13.2 Steps Necessary to Implement If the City determines that a customer is wastefully using water, the City first sends a letter to the customer to call attention to their wasteful practice and ask for correction. If the water waste condition is not corrected within five days after the written notice, service may be discontinued if necessary. 6.13.3 Implementation Schedule This DMM will be performed on an ongoing, year-round basis. 6.13.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The City has not established a method to evaluate the effectiveness of this DMM. 6.14 DMM 14 - RESIDENTIAL ULTRA LOW FLUSH TOILET REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS State legislation requires the installation of efficient plumbing in new construction, and, effective in 1994, requires that only ULFTs be sold in California. ULFTs include toilets that use 1.6 gallons per flush or less. 6.14.1 Implementation Status The City has implemented an ULFT rebate program, but does not record the number of rebates given out nor the expenditures by the City as a result of this program. June 2011 6-14 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 6.14.2 Steps Necessary to Implement The City complies with the applicable State and Federal regulations regarding rebates for the replacement of older toilets with an ULFT and installation of ULFTs in new construction. 6.14.3 Implementation Schedule This DMM is an ongoing, year-round program. 6.14.4 Methods to Evaluate Program Effectiveness The City does not keep track of the number of rebates given or the expenditures associated with this program. Therefore, the City has not developed a method to evaluate the effectiveness of this DMM. 6.14.5 Cost Benefit Analysis for Expansion of Program Although it does have an ULFT rebate program, the City does not keep records of the extent or expenditures related to this program. Therefore, an economic analysis was performed on this DMM and is included in Appendix I, which is summarized in Table 6.6. The economic analysis performed considered the relative benefits of implementing this DMM from an agency perspective and from a society perspective. The difference in net program costs often results from additional customer program costs, accounted for under the society perspective estimates. Table 6.6 Cost Benefit Analysis, DMM 14 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Simple Net Total Net Unit Discounted Program Water Present Supply Unit Supply Cost Saved (2) Value Cost Cost Benefit/Cost Perspective ($) (AF) ($) ($/AF) ($/AF) Ratio Agency Perspective 36,000 49.8 (28,949) 723 933 0.20 Society 44,125 49.8 (36,727) 887 1,090 0.17 Perspective Notes: 1. Numbers in parentheses indicated negative numbers. 2. Total water saved represents the total water savings over a 25 -year period. As shown in Table 6.6, the benefit/cost ratios for this DMM from an agency perspective and society perspective are 0.20 and 0. 17, respectively. This indicates that this conservation measure is not justified from a cost perspective, and that the City may not consider further development of this program in the near future. June 2011 6-15 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 6.15 EXISTING CONSERVATION SAVINGS An estimate of existing conservation savings as a result of the implementation of the above DMMs is not currently available. According to the City's 2005 UWMP, it is likely that previous and ongoing conservation measures have resulted in water savings of approximately 2 to 5 percent of total water production. The water savings already achieved by existing conservation measures will have some impact on the City's ability to reduce water consumption further. However, the City anticipates achieving additional water savings through the future development and implementation of the DMMs described in this chapter. 6.16 PLANNED WATER SUPPLIES The City does not plan to implement any water supply projects that would provide water at a higher unit cost than was accounted for in the cost benefit analyses performed for DMMs 1, 2, 6, and 14. June 2011 6-16 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch06 Chapter 7 COMPLETED UWMP CHECKLIST 7.1 UWMP CHECKLIST In order to expedite the review of the 2010 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs), the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has developed a "Completed UWMP Checklist" that may be completed by urban water suppliers and included in their UWMPs. DWR offers two separate checklists with identical content, but which are organized differently. One version of the checklist is organized according to the Water Code legislative order. The other checklist is organized by topic, similar to the organization of DWR's Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 UWMP. Because the City of Ukiah's (City's) 2010 UWMP is organized according to the recommended guidebook format, the completed UWMP checklist (Table 7.1) presented on the following pages is organized by topic. Values in blue italics represent values input for the City's 2010 UWMP in the standardized DWR table. June 2011 7-1 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/Ch07 N Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah No. UWMP Requirement (1)°(2) 4 Coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other water suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable. 6 Notify, at least 60 days prior to the public hearing on the plan required by Section 10642, any city or county within which the supplier provides water that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan. Any city or county receiving the notice may be consulted and provide comments. 7 Provide supporting documentation that the UWMP or any amendments to, or changes in, have been adopted as described in Section 10640 et seq. 54 Provide supporting documentation that the urban water management plan has been or will be provided to any city or county within which it provides water, no later than 60 days after the submission of this urban water management plan. 55 Provide supporting documentation that the water supplier has encouraged active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of the plan. 56 Provide supporting documentation that the urban water supplier made the plan available for public inspection and held a public hearing about the plan. For public agencies, the hearing notice is to be provided pursuant to Section 6066 of the Government Code. The water supplier is to provide the time and place of the hearing to any city or county within which the supplier provides water. Privately -owned water suppliers shall provide an equivalent notice within its service area. 57 Provide supporting documentation that the plan has been adopted as prepared or modified. 58 Provide supporting documentation as to how the water supplier plans to implement its plan. Calif. Water Code UWMP Reference Additional Clarification Location 10620(d)(2) G. is Sec. 1.3 (pg. 1-3 to 1-6) Table 1.1 10621(b) Ch 1; Sec 1.3 (. 1-7 10621(c) G. is Sec. 1.3.2 (pg. 1=) & App. D 10635(b) Ch. 1; Sec. 1.3.3 (pg. 1- App. E 10642 G. is Sec. 1.3 (. 1-3) & Table 1.1 10642 Ch. 1; Sec. 1.3 (. 1-3) & App. B 10642 G. is Sec. 1.3.2 (pg. 1=) & App. D 10643 Ch. 1; Sec. 1.3.4 (pg- 1- v Co Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Calif. Water Code UWMP No. UWMP Requirement Reference Additional Clarification Location 59 Provide supporting documentation that, in addition to submittal to DWR, 10644(a) Ch. is Sec. 1.3.3 the urban water supplier has submitted this UWMP to the California State (pg. 1=) & App. E Library and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies a copy of its plan no later than 30 days after adoption. This also includes amendments or changes. 60 Provide supporting documentation that, not later than 30 days after filing a 10645 Ch. 1; Sec. 1.3.3 copy of its plan with the department, the urban water supplier has or will (pg- 1 - make the plan available for public review during normal business hours SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 8 Describe the water supplier service area. 10631(a) Ch. 2, Sec. 2.1 2.2 (pg. 2-1 to 2-8) 9 Describe the climate and other demographic factors of the service area of 10631(a) Ch. 2; Sec. 2.1.1 the supplier Sec. 2.2 (. 2.5 to 2_ 10 Indicate the current population of the service area 10631(a) Provide the most recent Ch. 2, Sec. 2.2 population data possible. Use (pg- 2-6) the method described in "Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use." See Section M. 11 Provide population projections for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030, based on 10631(a) 2035 and 2040 can also be Ch. 2; Sec. 2.2 data from State, regional, or local service area population projections. provided to support consistency (. 2_; with Water Supply Assessments and Written Verification of Water Supply documents. 12 Describe other demographic factors affecting the supplier's water 10631(a) Ch. 2, Sec. 2.2 management planning. (. 2_) SYSTEM DEMANDS 1 Provide baseline daily per capita water use, urban water use target, 10608.20(e) Ch. 3. Sec. 3.1 interim urban water use target, and compliance daily per capita water use, (pg- 3-1 to 3-1 along with the bases for determining those estimates, including references to supporting data. Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Calif. Water Code UWMP No. UWMP Requirement Reference Additional Clarification Location 2 Wholesalers: Include an assessment of present and proposed future 10608.36 Retailers and wholesalers have Ch. is Seo. 1.3 (pg. measures, programs, and policies to help achieve the water use 10608.26(a) slightly different requirements 1-7) reductions. Retailers: Conduct at least one public hearing that includes general discussion of the urban retail water supplier's implementation plan for complying with the Water Conservation Bill of 2009. 3 Report progress in meeting urban water use targets using the 10608.40 NotApplicable standardized form. until 2015 UWMP 25 Quantify past, current, and projected water use, identifying the uses 10631(e)(1) Consider'past' to be 2005, Ch. 3, Seo 3.2 (pg. among water use sectors, for the following: (A) single-family residential, present to be 2010, and 3-10 to 3-21) (B) multifamily, (C) commercial, (D) industrial, (E) institutional and projected to be 2015, 2020, governmental, (F) landscape, (G) sales to other agencies, (H) saline 2025, and 2030. Provide water intrusion barriers, groundwater recharge, conjunctive use, and (1) numbers for each category for agriculture. each of these years. 33 Provide documentation that either the retail agency provided the 10631(k) Average year, single dry year, NotApplicable wholesale agency with water use projections for at least 20 years, if the multiple dry years for 2015, UWMP agency is a retail agency, OR, if a wholesale agency, it provided 2020, 2025, and 2030. its urban retail customers with future planned and existing water source available to it from the wholesale agency during the required water -year types 34 Include projected water use for single-family and multifamily residential 10631.1(a) Ch. 3, Seo. 3.2.5 housing needed for lower income households, as identified in the housing (pg- 3-21) element of any city, county, or city and county in the service area of the SYSTEM supplier. SUPPLIES 13 Identify and quantify the existing and planned sources of water available 10631(b) The 'existing' water sources Ch. 4; Section 4.1.3 for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030. should be for the same year as (p g. 4_-5 the "current population" in line 10. 2035 and 2040 can also be provided. v Cn Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Calif. Water Code UWMP No. UWMP Requirement Reference Additional Clarification Location 14 Indicate whether groundwater is an existing or planned source of water 10631(b) available to the supplier. If yes, then complete 15 through 21 of the UWMP Checklist. If no, then indicate "not applicable" in lines 15 through 21 under the UWMP location column. 15 Indicate whether a groundwater management plan been adopted by the 10631(b)(1) water supplier or if there is any other specific authorization for groundwater management. Include a copy of the plan or authorization. 16 Describe the groundwater basin. 10631(b)(2) 17 Indicate whether the groundwater basin is adjudicated? Include a copy of 10631(b)(2) Source classifications are: surface water, groundwater, recycled water, storm water, desalinated sea water, desalinated brackish groundwater, and other. Provide projections for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030. Ch. 4, Sec. 4.1.1 (pg. 4-4) Sec. 4.2 (pg. 4-7 to 4-9) Ch. 4, Sec. 4.2.1 (pg. 4-7 to 4-9) . 4; Sec. 4.2.1 (pg- 4-7) Not.4- ot App/fca/e Ch. 4, Sec. 4.3 (pg. 4=9 to 4-10) . 4; Sec. 4.3 (. 4-9 to 4-1 Ch. 4, Sec. 4.4 (pg. 4=10 to 4-11) the court order or decree. 18 Describe the amount of groundwater the urban water supplier has the 10631(b)(2) legal right to pump under the order or decree. If the basin is not adjudicated, indicate "not applicable" in the UWMP location column. 19 For groundwater basins that are not adjudicated, provide information as to 10631(b)(2) whether DWR has identified the basin or basins as overdrafted or has projected that the basin will become overdrafted if present management conditions continue, in the most current official departmental bulletin that characterizes the condition of the groundwater basin, and a detailed description of the efforts being undertaken by the urban water supplier to eliminate the long-term overdraft condition. If the basin is adjudicated, indicate "not applicable" in the UWMP location column. 20 Provide a detailed description and analysis of the location, amount, and 10631(b)(3) sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the urban water supplier for the past five years 21 Provide a detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of 10631(b)(4) groundwater that is projected to be pumped. 24 Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short- 10631(d) term or long-term basis. Source classifications are: surface water, groundwater, recycled water, storm water, desalinated sea water, desalinated brackish groundwater, and other. Provide projections for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030. Ch. 4, Sec. 4.1.1 (pg. 4-4) Sec. 4.2 (pg. 4-7 to 4-9) Ch. 4, Sec. 4.2.1 (pg. 4-7 to 4-9) . 4; Sec. 4.2.1 (pg- 4-7) Not.4- ot App/fca/e Ch. 4, Sec. 4.3 (pg. 4=9 to 4-10) . 4; Sec. 4.3 (. 4-9 to 4-1 Ch. 4, Sec. 4.4 (pg. 4=10 to 4-11) v rn Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Calif. Water Code UWMP No. UWMP Requirement Reference Additional Clarification Location 30 Include a detailed description of all water supply projects and programs 10631(h) Ch. 4; Sec. 4.7 (. that may be undertaken by the water supplier to address water supply 4-21 to 4-23 reliability in average, single -dry, and multiple -dry years, excluding demand management programs addressed in (f)(1). Include specific projects, describe water supply impacts, and provide a timeline for each project. 31 Describe desalinated water project opportunities for long-term supply, 10631(i) Ch. 4, Sec. 4.5 (pg. including, but not limited to, ocean water, brackish water, and 4=11 to 4-12) groundwater. 44 Provide information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water 10633 Ch. 4; Sec. 4.8 (. source in the service area of the urban water supplier. Coordinate with 4-12 to 4-21 local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies that operate within the supplier's service area. 45 Describe the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the 10633(a) Ch. 4, Sec. 4.6.1 to supplier's service area, including a quantification of the amount of 4.6.4 (pg. 4-13 to 4 - wastewater collected and treated and the methods of wastewater 1) disposal. 46 Describe the quantity of treated wastewater that meets recycled water 10633(b) Ch. 4; Sec. 4.8.3 standards, is being discharged, and is otherwise available for use in a (pg- 4-18 to 4-1 recycled water project. 47 Describe the recycled water currently being used in the supplier's service 10633(c) Ch. 4, Sec. 4.6.4 area, including, but not limited to, the type, place, and quantity of use. (pg- 4-18) 48 Describe and quantify the potential uses of recycled water, including, but 10633(d) Ch. 4; Sec. 4.8.5 not limited to, agricultural irrigation, landscape irrigation, wildlife habitat (pg- 4-19 to 4-2 enhancement, wetlands, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, indirect potable reuse, and other appropriate uses, and a determination with regard to the technical and economic feasibility of serving those uses. 49 The projected use of recycled water within the supplier's service area at 10633(e) Ch. 4, Sec. 4.6.4 the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and a description of the actual use of (pg. 4-1) & Sec. recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected. 4.6.5 (pg. 4-19 to v v Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Calif. Water Code UWMP No. UWMP Requirement Reference Additional Clarification Location 50 Describe the actions, including financial incentives, which may be taken to 10633(f) Ch. 4; Sec. 4.8.8 encourage the use of recycled water, and the projected results of these (pg- 4.20 to 4-21 actions in terms of acre-feet of recycled water used per year. 51 Provide a plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the supplier's 10633(g) Ch. 4, Sec. 4.6.7 service area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual (pg- 4-21) distribution systems, to promote recirculating uses, to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased use. SHORTAGEWATER .:SHORTAGE5 Describe water management tools and options to maximize resources 10620(f) Ch. 5; Sec. 5.1.1 and minimize the need to import water from other regions. (pg- -5=1 to 5.2 22 Describe the reliability of the water supply and vulnerability to seasonal or 10631(c)(1) Ch. 5, Sec. 5.4 (pg. climatic shortage and provide data for (A) an average water year, (B) a 5=14 to 5-19) single dry water year, and (C) multiple dry water years. 23 For any water source that may not be available at a consistent level of 10631(c)(2) Ch. 5; Sec. 5.1.2 use - given specific legal, environmental, water quality, or climatic factors (. -5_2 to 5.4 - describe plans to supplement or replace that source with alternative sources or water demand management measures, to the extent practicable. 35 Provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis that specifies 10632(a) Ch. 5, Sec. 5.2.1 stages of action, including up to a 50 -percent water supply reduction, and (pg. 5-6 to 5-8) an outline of specific water supply conditions at each stage 36 Provide an estimate of the minimum water supply available during each of 10632(b) Ch. 5; Sec. 5.4.2. the next three water years based on the driest three-year historic (pg- -5=18 sequence for the agency's water supply. 37 Identify actions to be undertaken by the urban water supplier to prepare 10632(c) Ch. 5, Sec. 5.2.2 for, and implement during, a catastrophic interruption of water supplies (. 5.9) including, but not limited to, a regional power outage, an earthquake, or other disaster. 38 Identify additional, mandatory prohibitions against specific water use 10632(d) Ch. 5; Sec. 5.2.3 practices during water shortages, including, but not limited to, prohibiting 5.2.4 (. -5_ to 5_ the use of potable water for street cleaning. 11 Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Calif. Water Code UWMP No. UWMP Requirement Reference Additional Clarification Location 39 Specify consumption reduction methods in the most restrictive stages. 10632(e) Ch. 5, Sec. 5.2.4 Each urban water supplier may use any type of consumption reduction (pg- 5-11) methods in its water shortage contingency analysis that would reduce water use, are appropriate for its area, and have the ability to achieve a water use reduction consistent with up to a 50 percent reduction in water supply. 40 Indicated penalties or charges for excessive use, where applicable. 10632(f) Ch. 5; Sec. 5.2.5 (pg- -5=11 to 5-12 41 Provide an analysis of the impacts of each of the actions and conditions 10632(g) Ch. 5, Sec. 5.2.6 described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, on the revenues and (pg. 5-11 to 5-13) expenditures of the urban water supplier, and proposed measures to overcome those impacts, such as the development of reserves and rate adjustments. 42 Provide a draft water shortage contingency resolution or ordinance. 10632(h) Ch. 5; Sec. 5.2.7 (pg- -5=13 & App. F 43 Indicate a mechanism for determining actual reductions in water use 10632(i) Ch. 5, Sec. 5.2.8 pursuant to the urban water shortage contingency analysis. (pg- 5-13) 52 Provide information, to the extent practicable, relating to the quality of 10634 For years 2010, 2015, 2020, Ch. 5. Sec. 5.3 (. existing sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year 2025, and 2030 -5=13 to -5=14 increments, and the manner in which water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability 53 Assess the water supply reliability during normal, dry, and multiple dry 10635(a) Ch. 5, Sec. 5.4.3 to water years by comparing the total water supply sources available to the 5.4.5 (pg. 5-17 to 5_ water supplier with the total projected water use over the next 20 years, in 19) five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and multiple dry water years. Base the assessment on the information compiled under Section 10631, including available data from state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier. Table 7.1 Completed UWMP Checklist, Organized by Topic 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Calif. Water Code UWMP No. UWMP Requirement Reference Additional Clarification Location DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES 26 Describe how each water demand management measures is being 10631(f)(1) Discuss each DMM, even if it is Ch. 6; Sec. 6.1 to implemented or scheduled for implementation. Use the list provided. not currently or planned for 6.14 (pg. 6-1 to 6 - implementation. Provide any 1-5 appropriate schedules. 27 Describe the methods the supplier uses to evaluate the effectiveness of 10631(f)(3) Ch. 6, Sec. 6.1 to DMMs implemented or described in the UWMP. 6.14 (pg. 6-1 to 6- 15) 28 Provide an estimate, if available, of existing conservation savings on 10631(f)(4) Ch. 6; Sec. 6.1 to water use within the supplier's service area, and the effect of the savings 6.14 (pg. 6-1 to b- on the ability to further reduce demand. 1-5 29 Evaluate each water demand management measure that is not currently 10631(g) See 10631(g) for additional Ch. 6, Sec. 6.1 to being implemented or scheduled for implementation. The evaluation wording. 6.14 (pg. 6-1 to 6 - should include economic and non -economic factors, cost -benefit analysis, 15) available funding, and the water suppliers' legal authority to implement the work. 32 Include the annual reports submitted to meet the Section 6.2 106310) Signers of the MOU that submit NotApplicable requirements, if a member of the CUWCC and signer of the December the annual reports are deemed 10, 2008 MOU. compliant with Items 28 and 29. Notes: 1. The UWMP Requirement descriptions are general summaries of what is provided in the legislation. Urban water suppliers should review the exact legislative wording prior to submitting its UWMP. 2. The Subject classification is provided for clarification only. It is aligned with the organization presented in Part I of this guidebook. A water supplier is free to address the UWMP Requirement anywhere with its UWMP, but is urged to provide clarification to DWR to facilitate review. City of Ukiah APPENDIX A - OUTREACH DOCUMENTS AND COORDINATION WITH RELEVANT AGENCIES pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr March 25, 2011 County of Mendocino Attn: Executive Office 501 Low Gap Road #110 Ukiah, CA 95482-3734 Subject: Notice of Preparation of the 2010 City of Ukiah Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) Dear Executive Officer Angelo: Pursuant to the requirements of the California Water Code, Division 6, Part 2.6 Urban Water Management Planning, Section 10621 (b), every urban water supplier required to prepare a plan pursuant to this part shall, at least 60 days prior to the public hearing on the plan required by Section 10642, notify any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan. This letter is intended to notify your agency that the City of Ukiah (City) is in process of preparing the 2010 UWMP. Based on the City's current schedule, we expect to have a public review draft of the 2010 UWMP available for review by June 1, 2011 at which point your agency will receive a notification letter that the draft UWMP is available for public review. If your agency would like to submit comments or provide input to the City in anticipation of the development of the 2010 UWMP, please submit written copies to: Jarod Thiele Public Works Administration City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482-5400 Sincerely, CITY OF UKIAH Jarod Thiele for Tim Eriksen Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: Tommy Greci, Carollo Engineers, Inc. Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 300 SEMINARY AVENUE, UKIAH, CA 95482-5400 Phone# 707/463-6200 Fax# 707/463-6204 Web Address: www.cityofukiah.com City of Ukiah APPENDIX B - NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW OF 2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr Ukiah Daily Journal 590 S. School St PO Box 749 Ukiah, California 95482 (707) 468-3500 udjlegals@pacific.net UKIAH,CITY OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE,300 SEMINARY AVE UKIAH CA 95482 PROOF OF PUBLICATION . (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MENDOCINO I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Ukiah Daily Journal, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the City of Ukiah, County of Mendocino and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Mendocino, State of California, under the date of September 22, 1952, Case Number 9267; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than non-pareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 6/1/2011, 6/8/2011 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Ukiah, California, June 8th, 2011 Signature Legal No. 434-11 City of Ukiah 0004020971 6-1,8/11 Notice of Public Hearing -2010 Urban Water Management Plan NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT Pursuant to California Water Code (CWC) section 10642 and 10608, a public hearing will be held on the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (2010 UWMP. The City of Ukiah (City) will con- duct a public hearing on June 15, 2011, at 6:15 pm in the City Coun- cil Chambers located at 300 Seminary Avenue to receive public comment relative to the proposed 2010 UWMP and the water conservation baseline and targets associated with the Wa- ter Conservation Act of 2009. This will be an update to the Cit - Y's 2005 UWMP. The 2010 UWMP complies with recent amend- ments to the CWC. A copy of the 2010 Final Draft UWMP is available, during nor- mal business hours, at the City Hall. You can also access this document at the City of Ukiah website at www.cityofuklah.com. The final draft will be presented by the consultant at a workshop for the public on June 8, 2011 at 2 p.m.at the Ukiah Valley Confer- ence Center, 200 S. School Street, in the Chenin Blanc Room. For questions concerning the document, please contact Jarod Thiele at 707-463-6755. Written comments are requested by the close of business on June 8, 2011. Send written comments to: Jarod Thiele, Public Works Dept., 300 Seminary Ave, Ukiah, CA 95482. Upon completion of said public hearing, the plan will be adop- ted as prepared or as modified. This notice shall be published once a week for two successive weeks. s/JoAnne M. Currie, City Clerk for City of Ukiah City of Ukiah APPENDIX C - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON WATER SUPPLY, RIGHTS, AND RELIABILITY (WAGNER AND BONSIGNORE) pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr Technical Analysis of Future Water Supply Reliability Supporting Chapters 4 and 5 Of the City of Ukiah 2010 Urban Water Management Plan June, 2011 Wagner&Bonsignore Consulting Civil Engineers, A Corporation 2151 River Plaza Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento CA 95833 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................4 UWMPCHAPTER 4...........................................................................................................................5 4.1 Water Supply Sources.................................................................................................6 4.2 Groundwater Basin.................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Existing And Projected Groundwater Pumping......................................................... 13 4.4 Transfer And Exchange Opportunities......................................................................14 4.5 Desalinated Water Opportunities...............................................................................15 4.6 Recycled Water Opportunities...................................................................................15 4.7 Future Water Projects................................................................................................ 15 UWMPCHAPTER 5.........................................................................................................................16 5.1 Water Supply Reliability............................................................................................17 5.2 Water Shortage Contingency Planning......................................................................23 5.3 Water Quality.............................................................................................................23 5.4 Drought Planning....................................................................................................... 24 EVALUATION OF WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY SUPPORTING CHAPTERS 4 AND 5 OFTHE UWMP................................................................................................................................29 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 30 Assumptions And Supporting Documentation...................................................................... 30 Section 1: Projected Water Use.......................................................................... 30 Section 2: Projected Future Russian River Hydrology .............................................. 32 Evaluation Of Water Supply Reliability................................................................................ 36 2 ATTACHMENTS List of Figures: Figure 1 — City of Ukiah Water Use Figure 2 — City of Ukiah Average Monthly Water Use Figure 3 - City of Ukiah Monthly Pattern of Pumping & Resulting Depletion to Russian River Figure 4 - Lake Pillsbury Target and Maximum Storage Figure 5 - Potter Valley Project Imports to East Fork Russian River Figure 6 - Historical Lake Mendocino Content Figure 7 - Russian River Average Net Loss, Forks to Healdsburg, 1987-2009 Figure 8 - Historical Russian Minimum River Flow in Excess of D-1610 Requirement Attributable to Release from Lake Mendocino, 1988-2006 Figure 9 - Historical Change in Russian River Net Loss, Forks to Healdsburg Figure 10 - Average Modeled Downstream Demand, 1961-2009 Figure 11 - Average Modeled Downstream Demand, 1961-2009 Figure 12 - Lake Mendocino Modeled Outflow Figure 13 - Lake Mendocino Modeled Elevation List of Tables: Table 1 Projected Total Annual Diversion Table 2 Estimated Annual Depletion Table 3 Historical Potter Valley PowerHouse Import to E. Fork of the Russian River Table 4 Lake Mendocino Historical Inflows Plates Plate I - Groundwater Availability in the Ukiah Groundwater Basin Plate 11- Groundwater Wells in Ukiah Valley 9 Executive Summary This report documents analyses conducted to evaluate water supply reliability for the 2010 City of Ukiah Urban Water Management Plan update. The analysis considers the Russian River hydrology in the context of the changing regulatory environment affecting resource management decisions, as well as City of Ukiah projected maximum demand authorized under its existing water right permit. The City holds, among other water rights, a 1954 appropriative water right Permit 12952 (Application 15704) for 20 cfs from Russian River Underflow. To determine the maximum authorized diversion volume under the terms of the permit, we evaluated monthly water use for the 2004 through 2010 period, and found that peak demand occurs in July. Accordingly, we fixed July demand at 20 cfs, and projected demand for the remaining months based on the monthly average use pattern. The projected annual demand is expected to be around 8,700 acre-feet. This demand was used to evaluate depletion from the Russian River, which was estimated to be 37% of the total demand on an annual basis. In addition to projected demand from the City, the analysis evaluated water required to satisfy other demands downstream of Lake Mendocino, including river losses, and all releases required to meet minimum instream flow requirements under both the 2008 Biological Opinion related to salmonids in the Russian River, and State Water Resources Control Board Decision 1610. Inflow to the Russian River system was estimated based on historic gaged flow from the Eel River imports, the East and West Forks of the Russian River and naturally tributary areas. The results of the analysis indicate that water is available from the Russian River to meet the City of Ukiah's projected maximum demand under Permit 12952 (Application 15704) under a regulatory environment dictated by the terms of Decision 1610, or the Biological Opinion. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that the City's maximum demand has an insignificant impact on the Russian River system, as demonstrated by the negligible reduction in water surface elevation of Lake Mendocino. Average unimpaired tributary inflow to the Ukiah Valley as measured at the West Fork Russian River gage is about 126,000 acre feet annually. Average unimpaired inflow as previously calculated for the 1975 through 2003 period of record from the East Fork Russian River is 77,000 acre feet annually. Precipitation falling on the watershed tributary to Ukiah Valley (137 square miles) is 267,000 acre feet annually, based on an average of 36.5 inches of precipitation per year. Although a portion of the precipitation will contribute to runoff, conservatively assuming that 25% recharges, an average of 67,000 acre-feet per year is available. Accordingly, the total recharge opportunity to the Ukiah Valley including the Russian River and precipitation is conservatively estimated at about 270,000 acre-feet per year, on average, and exceeds the City's expected maximum 8,700 acre-foot draft on the groundwater resources by 3,100%. Consequently we do not expect the groundwater resources to experience any meaningful long term decline in the future. Accordingly, the analysis supports the information provided in Chapters 4 and 5 of the Urban Water Management Plan. Specifically, the analysis demonstrates that the City's appropriative rights provide a reliable water supply, and that the City's projected maximum diversion does not measurably impact the underlying groundwater table or the Russian River. rd CHAPTER 4 2010 CITY OF UKIAH URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 4.1 WATER SUPPLY SOURCES The City's water supply sources include groundwater, surface water from the underflow of the Russian River, and 800 acre-feet of project water available from the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District. The City is completing a recycled water management plan, and recycled water may become available as an additional supply. Table 4.2 below below provides a summary of the water supply sources. 4.1.1 Water Supply Facilities The following table provides a list of all groundwater and surface water diversion facilities currently in use by the City. Table 4.1 Water Supply Wells 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Production Facility Type of Supply Current Capacity Status (gpm) Ranney ��� Surface water Active 3194 Collector Well 43 Groundwater influenced by surface water Active 600 Well 44 Groundwater Active 799 Well 45 Groundwater influenced by surface water Active 300 Well 47 Groundwater Active 799 Well 48 Groundwater Active 694 Total Active Well Capacity 100% (gpm) 6,386 Total Active Well Capacity 100% (AFY) 10,308 Total Active Well Capacity 80% (AFY) 8,246 Notes: 1. Source: City staff records. 2. The Ranney Collector can only be used during the dry season when surface water turbidity is low. The supply facilities summarized above are described in more detail in the following sections. 31 Surface Water Diversion The City's surface water supply is obtained from a Ranney collector and Wells 3 and 5, which draw water from an alluvial zone along the Russian River. The supply source has been deemed groundwater under the direct influence of surface water by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) pursuant to 22 CCR §64651.10 of the California Water Works Standards. The determination is based on turbidity of the diverted water, which fluctuates with the turbidity in the Russian River. Accordingly, although the diversion is from Russian River underflow and may also be considered groundwater, water diverted from the Ranney Collector and Wells 3 and 5 is classified as surface water. Well has an estimated pumping capacity of 600 gpm and Well has an estimated pumping capacity of 300 gpm. The Ranney collector was constructed in 1966 along the banks of the Russian River with a design capacity of 13 million gallons per day (mgd). Production has steadily declined from a maximum of 9 mgd to a current capacity of 4.6 mgd. The significant capacity loss may be a result of clay and silt compaction above the Ranney Collector, or may indicate that the Russian River channel is moving away from the Ranney collector. The Ranney collector can only be used when turbidity in the Russian River is low, a condition which occurs during dry weather conditions. During the rainy months, Russian River turbidity increases and the Microfloc contact clarification -filtration units located at the water treatment plant cannot be operated efficiently. Groundwater The City currently diverts groundwater at Wells 4, 7 and 8. Well has a capacity of 799 gpm, Well has a capacity of 799 gpm and Well 8 has a capacity of 694 gpm. Wells 7 and 8 were brought online in 2008. 4.1.2 Distribution System and Storage Intentionally left blank. Current and Projected Water Sources The following is a summary of the City's current and projected water sources, followed by a description of the basis of right for each source. 7 Table 4.2 Water Supplies — Current and Projected (Guidebook Table 16) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water Supply Sources 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 - opt Wholesaler Water purchased from: supplied volume (yes/no) Yes 800 800 800 800 800 800 Project Water (Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District) Supplier-produced No 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 groundwater' Supplier-produced surface No 14,480 14,480 14,480 14,480 14,480 14,480 water Permit 12952 (Application 15704) Supplier-produced surface No 2,027 2,027 2,027 2,027 2,027 2,027 water (pre-1914 Rights) Transfers in No 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exchanges In No 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recycled Water No 0 603 883 1,163 1,723 2,283 Desalinated Water No 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 21,012 21,615 21,895 22,175 1 22,735 23,295 Units: acre-feet per year 'Assumed groundwater pumping capacity based on information from Carollo Engineering is 3,705 acre-feet. Permit 12952 (A15704) is authorizes diversion of 20 cfs, with no annual limit. Asa practical matter, if peak demand is 20 cfs, annual total diversion distributed according to current use patterns would result in a total diversion of approximately 8,700 acre-feet. However, the City's water right is valid for the 14,480 acre-feet as reported above. 3 Estimate of recycled water available provided by Carollo Engineering. The following sections describe the water supply sources itemized in Table 4.2 above. Contract Water/Project Water Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District (District) holds Water Right Permit 12947B for storage and use of up to 8,000 AF annually of water stored in Lake Mendocino and/or directly diverted from the East Fork of the Russian River. The City has a water supply agreement that allows the purchase up to 800 AF of water annually under the District's permit. The District is considered a wholesale provider for purposes of this UWMP, and Table 4.3 in section 4.1.4 provides the projected wholesale amounts of project water. Supplier Produced Groundwater The City assumes Wells 4, 7 and 8 pump groundwater. However, the City has filed petitions with the State Water Resources Control Board to add Wells 5, 7 and 8 to its water right permit, as a precaution in the event there is an evidentiary finding that the water pumped from wells is actually subject to the permitting authority of the Sate Water Board. There is a legal presumption that groundwater pumped from a groundwater basin is not subject to appropriation by permit. The City does not waive this legal presumption regarding groundwater. Appropriative Rights: Supplier Produced Surface Water An evaluation of the groundwater and surface water available to satisfy the City's appropriative rights is provided in Appendix 1 for reference. The following describes the City's appropriative rights. Water Right Permit 12952 (Application 15704) Water Right Permit 12952 (Application 15704) provides for the diversion of Russian River underflow for municipal purposes. Under this Permit, water can be diverted at a rate not to exceed 20.0 cfs (9,000 gpm) from January 1 through December 31 (with no annual limit). The Permit expired on December 31, 2000 and the City filed a Petition for Extension of Time with the State Water Board. The City has also filed a Petition with the State Water Board to add Wells 5, 7 and 8 and expand its place of use under Permit 12952 (Application 15704). The Permit is valid while the Petitions are processed and currently covers Wells 2 (no longer in use) and 3 and the Ranney collector. Pre 1914 Water Right The City has Pre -1914 Appropriative Right for at least 2.8 cfs for diversion from the Russian River for a maximum of 2,027 acre-feet annually. This water right is recognized in State Water Rights Board (predecessor to State Water Resources Control Board) Decision 1030. Recycled Water The City is currently completing a recycled water management plan, and anticipates that recycled water could be available for landscape irrigation and consumptive reuse within the water treatment plant. I Wholesale Supplies Table 4-3 Wholesale Supplies — Existing, Planned Sources of Water (Guidebook Table 17) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Wholesale sources Contracted 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 - opt Volume District 800 800 800 800 800 800 Units: acre-feet per year 'Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District 4.2 GROUNDWATER BASIN This section provides a description of the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin. 4.2.1 Groundwater Basin Description The Ukiah Valley groundwater basin (Number 1-52 as described in California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 118) is located in southeastern Mendocino County and is the largest basin along the Russian River. This basin is not adjudicated. The Ukiah Valley groundwater basin (aquifer) is approximately 22 miles long and 5 miles wide and underlies Ukiah Valley and Redwood Valley. Geologic and groundwater characteristics underlying Sanel Valley are similar, however, bedrock effectively separates the Sanel aquifer from the Ukiah aquifer. The Ukiah Valley is the largest of several interior valleys in Mendocino County that fall along the north- northwest trending Maacama Fault Zone. The basement rock is of the Franciscan Complex, of variable but minor water yielding capacity. The valley is filled up to 2000 feet deep with unconsolidated or loosely cemented gravel, sand, silt, and clay deposited through eons of erosion, transport and sedimentation. The valley fill is categorized as three separate deposits. The oldest and lowest unit is the continental basin deposits. It is estimated to be up to 2000 feet in depth near the axis of the valley. Wells completed in the continental basin deposits produce water slowly because of consolidated, fine-grained material and low permeability. Well yield ranges from 1 — 50 gallons per minute (gpm). The second unit is the continental terrace deposits, situated mostly on the periphery of the valley. These deposits are relatively thin (up to 25 feet), have a low permeability and are not a significant groundwater source. The third valley fill unit is the Holocene alluvium, consisting of uncemented gravel, sand, silt and clay deposited in the last 10,000 years. The Holocene alluvium covers approximately 30 square miles 10 throughout broad areas of the flood plain and more narrow bands along the Russian River north of the Forks and along tributary streams. It is generally less than 100 feet thick but extends up to 200 feet in depth. Consisting of coarse and uncemented sediments, the alluvium exhibits high porosity and permeability, thereby holding a significant quantity of water and transmitting water rapidly. Well yields range from 100 to 1000 gpm. The principal source of groundwater is infiltration of precipitation. Other sources contributing to Ukiah valley groundwater are streamflow leakage, deep percolation from irrigation and treated effluent discharged via the City of Ukiah percolation ponds. Information on the storage capacity and groundwater levels within the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basins is found in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) published Water Resources Investigation Report 85-4258, "Groundwater Resources in Mendocino County, California" which states the following: • Groundwater wells in the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin monitored over a 30 year period show no prominent long-term declines. Hydrograph analysis indicates the Basin is recharged fully each year except when precipitation falls below 60 percent of normal. During the drought of 1976/77 when rainfall was less than 60 percent of normal, the groundwater wells recovered to normal levels by the end of the 1978 rainfall season. Further, California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 118 "California's Groundwater" states the following: • Groundwater in storage in the upper 100 feet of the most productive area of the Ukiah Valley is estimated at 90,000 acre-feet. • Groundwater storage located within the margins of the Ukiah Valley is estimated at an additional 45,000 acre-feet. • Groundwater levels in the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin for the past 30 years have remained relatively stable. • During drought conditions, drawdown of groundwater levels increases, but the levels recover in post -drought conditions. The volume of water available from pumping from upper 100 feet of the most productive portion of the aquifer is estimated at 90,000 acre-feet. Groundwater in the alluvium is hydraulically connected to and interacts with surface flows. The attached Plate I shows the estimated boundaries of the groundwater basin, consistent with DWR Bulletin 118 and estimated groundwater availability within the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin. 4.2.2 Groundwater Management Plan A groundwater management plan has not been prepared for the Ukiah Valley or Mendocino County. The City may coordinate with other affected agencies within the Basin to develop more information about the Ukiah groundwater basin and as a first step toward developing a groundwater study and a groundwater management plan. 11 4.2.3 Groundwater Levels and Historical Trends In general, the Ukiah Valley groundwater basin experiences seasonal and year to year variation in water levels due to climate and pumping stresses, as described in Bulletin 118 and the USGS Investigative Report 85-4258 referenced above. However, these variations tend to be small. Water levels decline in the dry months and some wells may experience declines during successive dry years. But water levels in general have always recovered. The groundwater table (the underground water surface) fluctuates seasonally, being at its highest level in March or April at the end of the wet season, and at its lowest in October, at the end of the dry season. Seasonal fluctuations range on the order of 5 to 20 feet. Measurements have been taken and recorded over a long time period at a few wells in the valley. Measurements were generally taken twice a year, at the end of the wet season and at the end of the dry season. The groundwater measurements show the water table rebounds during the wet season to about the same elevation in all but abnormally dry years such as 1977. The water table rebounded completely in one year of normal precipitation. Water surface measurements over the long-term show no trend in groundwater levels. The attached Plate II shows available groundwater hydrographs within the Ukiah Valley, as described above. A 1986 USGS investigation of groundwater levels in the Ukiah Valley (Ground -water Resources in Mendocino County, California; U.S. Geological Survey Water -Resources Investigations Report 85- 4258; July 1986) found that, "None of the hydrographs show any prominent long-term declines. Water levels measured during the 1980's are remarkably similar to those measured during the 1960's and 1970's." Bulletin 118 of the California Department of Water Resources, updated 2/27/04, in its section on the Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin (referenced below and attached) states, "Based on hydrographs from DWR monitored wells, groundwater levels in the past 30 years have remained relatively stable. During drought conditions there is increased drawdown during summer months and less recovery in winter months. Post -drought conditions rebound to approximately the same levels as pre -drought conditions." (A third reference regarding Ukiah valley groundwater is: Cardwell, G. T.; Geology and Ground Water in Russian River Valley Areas and in Round, Laytonville and Little Lake Valleys Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, California; Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1548; 1965.) When the river stage is high, water moves from the river into bank storage, where it is temporarily held until the river stage falls and water drains back to the river. When the aquifer water table is low, as happens toward the end of the dry season, water moves from the river to the aquifer. This is compounded by the effect of phreatophytes (water -loving plants) drawing water from the aquifer. Finally, pumping of wells may cause a localized drawdown of the water table, which may result in flow moving from the river to the aquifer. Accordingly, as described above, published data indicates the groundwater supplies are adequate to meet existing and future demands. In addition, Plate II contains hydrographs of long-term monitoring wells in 12 Ukiah Valley. The hydrographs show the seasonal fluctuation due to precipitation, the effect of drought in 1977 and the absence of a long-term trend in water surface elevation. 4.2.4 Groundwater Overdraft There does not appear to be a long term decline in water levels that would suggest shortage or overdraft in the Ukiah Valley. The basin is not considered over drafted and is not currently projected to be over drafted. The attached Plate II provides groundwater hydrographs of long-term monitoring wells in Ukiah Valley. The hydrographs show the seasonal fluctuation due to precipitation, the effect of drought in 1977 and the absence of a long-term trend in water surface elevation. 4.3 EXISTING AND PROJECTED GROUNDWATER PUMPING Table 4.4 below provides information on groundwater pumping reported on the Department of Water Resources Statistics Sheets from 2006 through 2010. Table 4.4 Groundwater Volume Pumped (Guidebook Table 18) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Basin name(s) Metered or 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Unmetered Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin Metered 1,347 1,185 1,380 1,486 1,990 Total groundwater pumped 1,347 1,185 1,380 1,486 1,990 Groundwater as a percent of total water supply 6.4% 5.6% 6.6% 7.1% 9.5% Units: acre-feet per year 'Total water supply is provided in Table 4.2 and is 21,012 acre-feet per year, including contract water, appropriative rights and groundwater. We note that all of the City water whether diverted from groundwater wells or diverted under its appropriative rights is supplied by groundwater. 2 Groundwater volume reported above taken rom DWR statistic sheets 2006-2010. Table 4.5 below provides projected groundwater pumping volumes for the 2015 — 2035 period of record. The volume is assumed to be the maximum capacity of the City's existing groundwater pumping facilities, which are itemized in Figure 4-1. 13 Table 4.5 Groundwater — Volume Projected to be Pumped (Guidebook Table 19) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Basin name(s) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Total Water Supply (Table 4.2) 21,615 21,895 22,175 22,735 23,295 Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 Total groundwater pumped 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 3,705 Percent of total water supply 17% 17% 17% 16% 16% Units: acre-feet per year 'Groundwater puniped assumed to be total groundwater puniping capacity of Wells 4, S, 7 and 8. 4.4 TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE OPPORTUNITIES The City does not transfer or exchange water with any of the surrounding water suppliers. However, the City has emergency intertie agreements with Millview County Water District and Redwood Valley County Water District, which provide that in the event of a water supply emergency, the City will receive water deliveries from the Districts through the interconnected supply system. In addition, the City is considering a regional approach to water management involving water purveyors within the Ukiah Valley. Such an approach would involve cooperation and potential transfers and exchanges between the following regional water suppliers: • Millview County Water District • Willow County Water District • Rogina Water Company • Calpella County Water District • Redwood Valley County Water District • Sonoma County Water Agency • Hopland Utilities District The regional planning effort is currently in its early stages, and agencies are identifying priorities and needs prior to moving forward with any potential future transfers or exchanges. 14 Table 4.6 Transfer and Exchange Opportunities (Guidebook Table 20) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Transfer agency Transfer or exchange Short term or long term Proposed Volume Millview County Water Districts Yes Long-term N/A Willow County Water District N/A 0 0 Rogina Water Company N/A 0 0 Calpella County Water District N/A 0 0 Redwood Valley County Water District Yes Long -Term N/A Sonoma County Water Agency N/A 0 0 Hopland Utility District N/A 0 0 Total 0 Notes: Units: acre-feet per year IMillview and Redwood Valley Water District are part of an emergency intertie agreement with the City. Although the agreement does not specify volumes, the signatories have agreed to provide water supplies through the interconnected systems in the event of a water supply emergency. 4.5 DESALINATED WATER OPPORTUNITIES Currently the surface water and groundwater supplies available to the City do not require desalinization. The City has no immediate plans to explore opportunities to desalinate ocean water, due to the plentiful supply of surface and groundwater in the region. 4.6 RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES Intentionally left blank. 4.7 FUTURE WATER PROJECTS Intentionally left blank 15 CHAPTER 5 2010 CITY OF UKIAH URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 16 5.1 WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY The following sections provide a description of the City's water supply reliability. 5.1.1 Resource Maximization/Import Minimization As described in Chapter 4, the City has groundwater and surface water resources available within the Ukiah Valley to meet existing and projected demand. To maximize resources available, the City has continued development of groundwater resources, bringing groundwater Wells 7 and 8 online in 2008. Chapter 4 includes a list of additional water supply development projects the City has planned. In addition, the City maintains its existing surface water diversion facilities (the Ranney Collector and Well 3) and has petitioned the State Water Resources Control Board to include additional points of diversion under Permit 12952 (Application 15704). Currently the City does not import water and does not anticipate importing water in the future to augment supply. 5.1.2 Factors Affecting Supply Reliability The following sections provide a description of the various factors which might impact water supply reliability, including legal, environmental, water quality and climatic factors. As indicated below, due to the nature of the City's appropriative rights and the volume of storage within the groundwater basin, it is unlikely that the City would experience a reduction in supply reliability. An evaluation of the groundwater and surface water available to satisfy the City's appropriative rights is provided in Appendix 1 for reference. 5.1.2.1 Legal Factors Legal Factors Affecting Groundwater Reliability Absent sufficient evidence to the contrary, groundwater is presumed to be percolating groundwater. The 1999 State Water Resources Control Board Decision No. 1639 In the Matter of Garrapata Water Company in Monterey County set forth criteria regarding the legal classification of groundwater. According to the Garrapata decision, for groundwater to be classified as surface water subject to appropriation, the following conditions must exist: 1. A subsurface channel must be present; 2. The channel must have relatively impermeable bed and banks; 3. The course of the channel must be known or capable of being determined by reasonable inference; 4. Groundwater must be flowing in the channel. The Garrapata decision, interpreting section 1200 of the Water Code, was followed and applied in the 2006 opinion of the First District Court of Appeals in the case, North Gualala Water Company v. State Water Resources Board (139 Cal. App. 4th 1577). That decision was left standing by the California Supreme Court. 17 With respect to Ukiah, the State Water Board has not made a finding related to groundwater the City might pump in the future. The legal presumption is that well water is percolating groundwater, and using the applicable legal standards and the available data, the City will make a determination regarding whether future wells require an appropriative water rights permit from the State Water Board. Historically, Division of Water Rights staff have generally accepted that existing Wells 4 pumps groundwater. City Wells 7 and 8 are presumed to pump groundwater, however, in the event of an evidentiary finding, the City has named the wells as proposed points of diversion in its petition before the State Water Board. Future diversions will be from groundwater sources, whether or not these sources are determined to be under the jurisdiction of the State Water Board. Legal Factors Affecting Surface Water Reliability The City's Water Right Permit 12952 expired on December 31, 2000 and the City filed a Petition for Extension of Time with the State Water Board. The Permit is still valid while the Petition for Extension of Time is processed. The City is preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) in support of its application for an extension of time and the City's pending Petitions to change its points of diversion and place of use. The initial study is complete, and the City is currently evaluating its response to comments on the proposed scope of the EIR. The City has steadily increased its use and has been diligent about maintaining its water right. The State Water Board is empowered to grant an extension of time to put water to beneficial use upon a showing to the State Water Board's satisfaction that due diligence has been exercised, that failure to comply with previous time requirements has been occasioned by obstacles that could not reasonably be avoided, and that satisfactory progress will be made if an extension of time is granted. (See 23 CCR §844.) The City should be able to make the required showing of due diligence, since through no fault of the City, the demand for water has not developed as quickly as was anticipated when the City's permit was issued. The State Water Board wrote in WRO 2000-13, In the Matter of the Petition for Extension of Time of the City of San Luis Obispo, Permit 5882 (A10216)... "a municipality such as San Luis Obispo is to be afforded some latitude in putting water to beneficial use, because the municipality must be able to plan for, and meet, the needs of its existing and future citizens (Water Code section 106.5, 1203.)" It is reasonable, although not guaranteed, that similar latitude would be granted to the City of Ukiah to develop full beneficial use of its water rights. Water Board approvals of successive extensions of time for municipalities to allow for gradual development has been the norm. As a matter of statutory policy (Water Code, sec. 106.5), municipal water rights are to be "protected to the fullest extent necessary for existing and future uses..." The greater deference shown a municipality is counter balanced by the allowance of temporary permits for the use of excess municipal water by other parties pending the expansion of the municipality's use (Water Code, sec. 1203). There does not appear to be any obstacles to approval of the changes in points of diversion and place of use, subject to California Environmental Quality Act review. The City's request for an extension of time to make full beneficial use of water under its permit does not require a showing of water availability since such a finding was made by the predecessor to the State Water Board in Decision 1030. IN In order to grant the City's Petition to change points of diversion and place of use, the State Water Board will need to make a finding that "the change will not operate to the injury of any legal user of water involved" (Water Code, sec. 1702). In relation to junior appropriators, the City has a priority right to the beneficial use of water up to the full volume or rate authorized in its appropriative permit. Beneficial use within that volume and rate does not in itself equate to injury to juniors under the "non -injury" rule. The State Water Board has discretion under appropriate circumstances to condition change orders for the protection of other users. The City knows of no reasonable basis for negative action by the State Water Board concerning the Petition change. The City's existing permit and pre 1914 right to divert from the Russian River provide a reliable supply source, which is unlikely to be interrupted due to legal factors, as illustrated above. 5.1.2.2 Environmental Factors Environmental factors affecting water supply reliability include any impediments to supply related to protection of fish and wildlife resources. Groundwater supply has not been impacted by any environmental factors to date, and the City does not anticipate future disruption of groundwater supply as a result of environmental factors. Similarly, the City does not anticipated disruption of surface water supply as a result of environmental factors due to existing regulation of flow rates in the Russian River. Decision 1610 of the State Water Resources Control Board regarding permits for diversion by the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) specified minimum flow rates to be maintained on the Russian River from the Forks (at Ukiah) to Dry Creek (just south of Healdsburg). The Decision also specified minimum flow rates on Dry Creek (below Lake Sonoma) and on the Russian River from Dry Creek to the ocean. SCWA has met these flow requirements by releasing water from Lake Mendocino and Lake Sonoma in the dry season. Because of the rates involved and the location of Lake Sonoma, the requirements below Healdsburg do not affect management of Lake Mendocino. Decision 1610 specified minimum flow rates that differ by season of the year and type of water year. The requirements range from as low as 25 cfs in a critically dry month to as high as 185 cfs in the spring with high reservoir levels. The requirements of D-1610 are conditioned on inflow to and storage in Lake Pillsbury (in the headwaters of the Eel River) and on storage in Lake Mendocino. The Biological Opinion (BO) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act for anadromous salmonids in the Russian River basin issued September 24, 2008 directed the SCWA to file a petition to the State Water Board to amend D-1610 for the purpose of reducing Russian River flows during the dry season. SCWA has filed that petition (as well as an Urgency Petition for the same effect which has been accepted by the State Water Board). The effect of the requirements for the Russian River above Dry Creek is to reduce the minimum flow during the months of June through October in normal years from 150 or 185 cfs (depending on hydrological conditions) to 125 cfs. The 2007 UWMP included an analysis of water available under various surface water supply scenarios, including a reduction in Eel River imports. In addition, the model was updated in 2010 as part of the City's ongoing EIR analysis. The results of the model indicated that given the current regulatory parameters, surface water is available for diversion by the City. The report is included herewith for reference. 19 As described above, water is available for diversion under the regulations currently in place to protect fish and wildlife resources. Accordingly, existing environmental regulations ensure supply reliability for the City. 5.1.2.3 Water Quality Factors Water quality issues are not anticipated to have significant impact on water supply reliability. If applicable in the future, chemical contamination and the lowering of maximum contaminate levels for naturally occurring constituents can be mitigated by construction new treatment facility prior to water delivery into the water distribution system. 5.1.2.4 Climatic Factors The Ukiah area receives an average of 36.5 inches of precipitation a year, as measured by the DWR "Ukiah" gage near the City of Ukiah. Table 5.1 below shows the annual rainfall measured at the Ukiah gage near the City of Ukiah. The relatively abundant precipitation contributes runoff to the Russian River system and recharges the groundwater basin. During average and above average years, supply exceeds the City's demand. To evaluate precipitation during dry periods, we evaluated the 25% driest years of record. Table 5.2 shows that during 19 of the 25 dry years, precipitation was over 20 inches. During the dry years, should surface water be unavailable, water supply is available to the City from the groundwater storage basin. The City's demand is insignificant when compared to the volume of water in the groundwater basin, which DWR Bulletin 118 estimates to contain approximately 90,000 acre-feet in storage. In addition, the hydrographs in Plate II demonstrate that groundwater surface elevations do not show evidence of long term reduction, remaining relatively stable. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the City's supply reliability would be influenced by climatic factors, as the groundwater basin can support the City's demand during below-average precipitation periods. 20 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Chart 5.1 Annual Precipitation Measured at Ukiah Precipitation Station near Ukiah, California (Precipitation measured in inches) 21 60 50 EEC 30 20 10 Chart 5.2 Driest 25% of Years of Record Annual Precipitation Measured at Ukiah Precipitation Station near Ukiah, California (Precipitation measured in inches) 22 The following table summarizes the factors affecting supply reliability for the various sources names in Table 4.2. Table 5.1 Factors Resulting in Inconsistency of Supply (Guidebook Table 29) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water supply sources Specific source Limitation Legal Environ - Water Climatic name, if any quantification mental quality Surface Water, Permit 12952 Russian River 14,480 afa Change to None None None (Application 15704) Underflow Permit Surface Water, Russian River 2,027 afa None None None None Pre -1914 rights Groundwater Ukiah Valley None None None None None Project Water Russian River 800 Change to None None None Contract Recycled Water -- unknown None None None None Units: acre-feet per year 'From Table 4.2. 2Permit 12952 (A15704) is authorizes diversion of 20 cfs, with no annual limit. As a practical matter, if peak demand is 20 cfs, annual total diversion distributed according to current use patterns would result in a total diversion of approximately 8,700 acre- eet. However, the City's water right is valid for the 14,480 acre-feet as reported above. 5.2 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING Intentionally left blank. 5.3 WATER QUALITY 5.3.1 Improvement Projects The Water Treatment Plant (WTP) commenced operation in April 1992 and treats water collected in the Ranney collector. The WTP is located about 300 feet from the Ranney Collector and uses the Microfloc contact clarification -filtration technology. Treatment processes include prechlorination, adsorption, clarification, mixed -media gravity filtration, and disinfection. Filter backwash water generated from the water treatment plant processes is discharged to two 216,000 -gallon clarification reservoirs for recycling. Treated water is pumped to a 1.5 mg clearwell /reservoir for post chlorination. From the clearwell, the water is pumped into the distribution system by vertical turbine high service pumps. Operation of the treatment plant is controlled through the use of a pressure transducer in the City's new 1.5 mg reservoir. Surface water Wells 3 and 5, along with percolated groundwater Well 4, are equipped with gas chlorination facilities. In addition, Well 4 is equipped with a continuous reading turbidimeter. After chlorination, water from the surface water and percolated groundwater well is pumped directly into the distribution system. 23 Improvements to the WTP were completed in September 2006. The improvements include an additional Microfloc contact clarification -filtration unit for reliability and redundancy, new chlorine scrubber, new sodium hydroxide tank and dispensing system, new water distribution SCADA system, and high service pumps. 5.3.2 Water Quality Impacts Summary The quality of the City's water system is regulated by DHS, which requires regular collection and testing of water samples to ensure that the water quality meets regulatory standards and does not exceed MCLs. The City performs water quality testing, which has consistently met or exceeded regulatory standards. The quality of existing surface water and percolated groundwater supply sources over the next 25 years is expected to be adequate. Surface water will continue to be treated to drinking water standards, and no surface water or groundwater quality deficiencies are foreseen to occur in the next 25 years. This plan will be subject to five year updates that can include new information concerning surface or groundwater contamination, if it becomes available. If new information becomes available in less than five years, the plan can be updated at that time to include that information and any revised water plans to address that information. Table 5.2 below summarizes the current and projected water supply changes due to water quality. The City has a Water Quality Emergency Notification Plan (Notification Plan) for use when it is determined that an imminent danger to the health of the water users exists. Within the Notification Plan, City staff is directed to contact local authorities, radio stations, television stations, and newspapers. If necessary, City personnel are available to make door-to-door notifications during the hours that other media sources are not available to broadcast a warning. Table 5.2 Water Quality — Current and Project Water Supply Impacts (Guidebook Table 30) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water source Water Quality Condition 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 - opt Russian River None 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Water None 0 0 0 0 0 0 Groundwater None 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recycled Water None 0 0 0 0 0 0 Units: acre-feet per year 5.4 DROUGHT PLANNING This section considers the City's water supply reliability during three climate -related water scenarios: normal water year, single dry water year, and multiple dry water years. These scenarios are defined in DWR's UWMP guidebook as follows: 24 Average Year (Normal Year) a year or an averaged range of years in the historical sequence that most closely represents median runoff levels and patterns. It is defined as the median runoff over the previous 30 years or more. This median is recalculated every 10 years. Single -dry year generally considered to be the lowest annual runoff for a watershed since the water - year beginning in 1903. Suppliers should determine this for each watershed from which they receive supplies. • Multiple -dry year period generally considered to be the lowest average runoff for a consecutive multiple year period (three years or more) for a watershed since 1903. For example, 1928-1934 and 1987-1992 were the two multi-year periods of lowest average runoff during the 20th century in the Central Valley basin. 5.4.1 Basis of Water Year Data Table 5.3 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Basis of water year data (Guidebook Table 27) Water Year Type Base Year(s) Average Water Year 1962 Single -Dry Water Year 1976-77 Multiple -Dry Water Years 1990-1992 Charts 5.1 and 5.2 provide annual precipitation and the 25% driest years of record for reference. 5.4.2 Supply Reliability - Historic and Current Conditions The following analysis assumes a 50% reduction in supply as a conservative estimate, consistent with the supply reduction scenario provided in Section 10632 of the California Water Code. Note that during the dry water years described in Table 5.3 above, the City did not experience a reduction in supply availability. Tables 5.4 and 5.5 below describe the scenario set forth in the code section, including multiple dry water years and resulting reduction in the City's water supply. 25 Table 5.4 Supply reliability historic conditions (Guidebook Table 28) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water supply sources Average Year z Supply Multiple Dry Water Year Supply Multiple Dry Water Years Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Average Water Year Single Dry Water Year 21,0121 10,506 10,506 10,506 10,506 10,506 Percent of Average Year2: 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Units: Acre feet per Year Notes: 121,012 is based on water available in 2011, and does not include potential future supply from recycled water.2. A 50% reduction of water supply is based on the value California Water Code Section 10632. As described in Section 5.1 above, it is unlikely that the City will experience a reduction in groundwater or surface water supply due to legal, environmental, water quality or climatic changes. The City's appropriative rights and the extensive groundwater storage within the Ukiah Valley groundwater basin ensure water supply reliability for the City. Table 5.5 Supply reliability — current water sources (Guidebook Table 31) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah Water supply sources Average Year z Supply Multiple Dry Water Year Supply Year 2011 Year 2012 Year 2013 Russian River 16,507 8,254 8,254 8,254 Project Water 800 400 400 400 Groundwater 3,705 1,853 1,853 1,853 Percent of normal year: 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Units: acre-feet per year 'From Table 4.2, 2010 available water supply sources. Does not include future potential recycled water supply. 2 The analysis above assumes a 50% reduction in supply, as specified in Code Section 10632. Section 5.1 above describes that, in the unlikely event that the City's surface water supply is interrupted, water is available for diversion from groundwater storage in the extensive Ukiah Valley Groundwater Basin. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the City will be faced with a 50% reduction in supply. 26 5.4.3 Projected Normal Year Supply/Demand Table 5.6 Projected Normal Year Supply/Demand (Guidebook Table 32) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 -opt Supply totals (from Table 4.2) 21,615 21,895 22,175 22,735 23,295 Demand totals (From Table 11) 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 Difference 17,767 18,300 18,397 18,764 19,122 Difference as % of Supply 82% 84% 83% 83% 82% Difference as % of Demand 462% 509% 487% 473% 458% 181% 205% 193% 186% 179% Units are in acre-feet per year. Units are in acre-feet per year. 'Assumes 50% reduction in supply, as directed by California Water Code Section 10632. 2Demand totals provided by Carollo Engineering. 5.4.4 Projected Single Dry Year Supply/Demand Table 5.7 Supply and demand comparison — single dry year (Guidebook Table 33) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 -opt Supply totals 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 Demand totals 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 Difference 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 Difference as % of Supply 64% 67% 66% 65% 64% Difference as % of Demand 181% 205% 193% 186% 179% Units are in acre-feet per year. 'Assumes 50% reduction in supply, as directed by California Water Code Section 10632. 2Demand totals provided by Carollo Engineering. 27 5.4.5 Projected Multiple Dry Year Supply/Demand Table 5.8 Supply and demand comparison - multiple dry -year events (Guidebook Table 34) 2010 Urban Water Management Plan City of Ukiah 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 -opt Supply totals 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 Demand totals 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 Multiple -dry year Difference 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 first year supply Difference as % of Supply 64% 67% 66% 65% 64% Difference as % of 181% 205% 193% 186% 179% Demand Supply totals 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 Demand totals 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 Multiple -dry year second year Difference 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 supply Difference as % of Supply 64% 67% 66% 65% 64% Difference as % of 181% 205% 193% 186% 179% Demand Supply totals 10,808 10,948 11,088 11,368 11,648 Demand totals 3,848 3,595 3,778 3,971 4,173 Multiple -dry year Difference 6,960 7,353 7,310 7,397 7,475 third year supply Difference as % of Supply 64% 67% 66% 65% 64% Difference as % of 181% 205% 193% 186% 179% Demand Units are in acre-feet per year. 'Assumes 50% reduction in supply, as directed in the DWR UWMP Guidelines and Code Section 10632. 2Demand totals provided by Carollo Engineering. EVALUATION OF WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY SUPPORTING CHAPTERS 4 AND 5 OF THE 2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 29 INTRODUCTION The source of the City of Ukiah's (City) water right is Russian River Underflow which has several components including, Russian River (West Fork), ungaged tributary inflow, groundwater accretion, return flow, percolation of direct precipitation and natural flow from the East Fork Russian River and Eel River imports. This analysis evaluates water supply reliability in the Russian River to meet the City's projected demand. The City's projected demand is met in part with water regulated in Lake Mendocino, the southernmost dam on the Russian River. Management of Lake Mendocino changes the volume of water in the Russian River at the City's points of diversion. Accordingly, outflow and water surface elevation of Lake Mendocino is used herein as a marker to evaluate both water supply reliability and the impact of the City's projected increased diversion. The assumptions and supporting documentation used to evaluate water supply are provided below. ASSUMPTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SECTION 1: PROJECTED WATER USE Projected Increased Diversions By The City Of Ukiah City of Ukiah annual treated water production has increased from about 2,200 acre-feet in 1960 to about 4,000 acre-feet in recent years, as shown in the attached Figure 1. Peak water use in the City typically occurs in July, as demonstrated by Figure 2, which provides average monthly water use. The recent (2004 through 2010) monthly water use pattern by the City was used to project annual water use corresponding to 20 cfs in July. 20 cfs is the maximum diversion rate authorized by the City's permit pursuant to Application 15704 issued by the State Water Right's Board (predecessor to the State Water Board). Based on 20 cfs use in July and the average monthly water use pattern, the projected maximum annual use would be 8,700 acre-feet. Although the City has a pre -1914 water right for 2.8 cfs and also pumps percolating groundwater from at least one of its wells, the analysis assumes an ultimate demand of 20 cfs. The attached Table 1 provides a calculation of total annual diversion based on a peak July demand of 20 cfs. To determine the effect the City's increased water use will have on water supply in the Russian River basin, return flow and depletion were estimated, as described below. Estimated Depletion Resulting from City of Ukiah Water Use Ukiah diverts using an infiltration gallery adjacent to the Russian River commonly referred to as the Ranney Collector, and using five wells situated through the City. Water diverted via the Ranney collector has an immediate impact on the Russian River flow. Water diverted via the all wells has an immediate effect on the aquifer, but not necessarily on the river. The following describes the relationship between the river and the Ukiah Valley aquifer during the dry and rainy seasons. During the rainy season, a seasonal rise in the water table occurs as precipitation percolates and recharges the aquifer. Due to the increased water surface elevation in the aquifer, groundwater drains to the river, and the Russian River become an "influent stream." During the dry season, the water surface elevation of the aquifer declines, and water is lost from the river to the aquifer. This seasonal decline in the aquifer level is partly natural and partly accelerated by groundwater pumping. As the water table falls below the bottom of the river, the hydraulic connection is broken, and the river becomes an "effluent stream," losing water to the aquifer. As an effluent stream, the water loss rate from the river is independent of the depth to the aquifer. Rather, river loss is a function of phreatophyte use and the permeability of the clogging layer at the bottom of the streambed. When the Russian River functions as an effluent stream, the lack of hydraulic continuity ensures that depletions to the aquifer do not affect river flows. The impact to the river occurs during the wet season, as the transition from an effluent stream to an influent stream is delayed until the aquifer is recharged. Accordingly, pumping from the groundwater basin does not impact Russian River flows during the dry season. Balance Hydrologics conducted a study for the City of Ukiah that evaluated groundwater flow conditions near the wastewater percolation ponds. Based on observations made near the percolation ponds, the river was an effluent stream during the months of June through October and an influent stream in the other months, however, conditions will differ elsewhere. For example, at the south (downstream) end of Ukiah valley, the bedrock rises to the bottom of the river forcing water from the aquifer to the river, and it may be possible that at that location, the river is an influent stream throughout the year. However, that is several miles from Ukiah's wells. To demonstrate connection between Ukiah's wells and river flow at the south end of the valley, a history of well-positioned monitoring wells and development of a basin -wide groundwater model would be required. For the investigation described herein, it was assumed that the Ukiah valley aquifer was disconnected from the river during the months of May through October and that depletions accumulated in the aquifer during those months would result in an equal volume of depletion to the river during the months of November, December and January. Table 2 illustrates the method and assumptions utilized to estimate Ukiah's impact on Russian river flows, and ultimate depletion. All the units are in terms of percent of annual use. As an example, assume the disposition of 100 acre-feet of annual use. In April, 6.3 acre-feet is pumped from the aquifer (row a). Because the aquifer is flowing to the river, it is assumed to result in an equal amount of reduced river flow (row b). Of the 6.3 acre-feet, 4.9 acre-feet was assumed to be used indoors (row c), corresponding to the observed wintertime usage. The indoor use is treated and (generally) returned directly to the river in the wet season (row d). Outdoor use is determined by subtraction (row e) and it is assumed that 15 percent of that returns to the aquifer by deep percolation (row f). A study of irrigated area in the Ukiah water service area may show a greater rate of municipal irrigation return flow. The depletion to the river (row g) is then 31 calculated as the sum of effects on the river due to pumpage minus return flow from wastewater treatment and irrigation. In the months of June through October, the water removed and returned to the aquifer (pumping, percolation ponds, irrigation percolation) does not affect the river. Those depletions are summed and added to the later depletions felt by the river in November, December and January. Figure 3 illustrates the monthly pattern of water use by Ukiah and resulting depletion to the Russian River. On an annual basis, the depletion is about 37 percent of the amount diverted. The depletion calculated as described above will have effects on water supply in the Russian River basin. The depletion calculation was used in the model in addition to projections of Russian River hydrology to determine the impact of the City of Ukiah's pumping. SECTION 2: PROJECTED FUTURE RUSSIAN RIVER HYDROLOGY The historical hydrology of the Russian River, including Eel River imports from the Potter Valley Project, Lake Mendocino operations and minimum required instream Russian River flows were used to establish a baseline condition. However, historical events will not be repeated because of two significant regulatory changes, which have resulted in changes to management of the Russian River system and Lake Mendocino. In 1986, State Water Resources Control Board Decision 1610 (D-1610) was issued setting forth minimum required streamflows on the Russian River below Lake Mendocino. Operations prior to that time did not need to meet D-1610 requirements. Subsequently, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) amended the hydroelectric license for the Potter Valley Project and in so doing, changed the volume of water imported from the Eel River to the Russian River. Both D-1610 and the FERC relicensing have had a significant impact on management of Lake Mendocino, specifically with respect to releases. Accordingly, the analysis herein incorporates historic data, and applies anticipated management decisions with respect to minimum instream flow in the Russian River and exports from the Eel River. The following describes the assumptions and supporting information used to project Russian River hydrology. Evaluation of Future Eel River Imports The East Fork of the Russian River receives imports from the Eel River via the Potter Valley Project, a tunnel operated by PG&E which joins the Eel River downstream of Lake Pillsbury to the Russian River at Potter Valley, upstream of Lake Mendocino. The Potter Valley Project imports are shown in Table 3, excluding the portion delivered to the East and West canals of the Potter Valley Irrigation District on the Russian River. Historically, about 138,000 acre-feet per year is delivered to the Russian River and detained in regulatory storage in Lake Mendocino. Total Lake Mendocino monthly inflow as reported by the US Army Corps of Engineers 32 (USAGE) averaged about 250,100 acre-feet per year, as shown on Table 4. Accordingly, imports from the Eel River have historically comprised just over half the inflow to Lake Mendocino. However, future imports from the Eel River are not likely to follow historical patterns due to conditions included in the FERC license issued for the Potter Valley Project. In 2004, FERC amended the hydropower license for the Potter Valley Project, specifying new operating criteria for minimum streamflows on the Eel River and allowable exports through the Potter Valley Project tunnel. Minimum allowable exports range from 5 cfs to 75 cfs, depending on the season and water year type. Although the license appears to allow discretionary exports through the tunnel, Condition E5 directs that exports in excess of the minimum flow specified can only be made when the water surface elevation in Lake Pillsbury (at the headwaters of the Eel River) is above target storage curves specified in the FERC license. However, the target water levels in the license exceed the maximum storage allowed by the State Division of Safety of Dams during early March through mid-July. Accordingly, FERC license Condition E5 effectively eliminates the possibility of exporting discretionary flows through the tunnel from March 7 through July 16, and perhaps during the remainder of the year, since it requires that Pillsbury contents be above the FERC target. Figure 4 illustrates the Lake Pillsbury maximum allowable storage and FERC storage targets. For purposes of estimating exports from the Eel River, we have assumed that Potter Valley Project exports will be replicated in the future as they were historically, except for the period of March 7 through July 16, when only the required minimum flow will be exported. This projection shows an average annual Potter Valley Project import to East Fork of the Russian River of about 102,300 acre-feet, or 26 percent less than historical. Accordingly, supply reliability for the City of Ukiah was evaluated assuming average Eel River exports of 102,300 acre-feet per year. Figure 5 shows how the projected Potter Valley Project imports to the East Fork of the Russian River compare to the historical import on an annual basis. Once exported, the water enters Lake Mendocino, and is subject to regulatory and operational constraints as described in the following section. Lake Mendocino Operational Analysis The Lake Mendocino operational analysis incorporates the existing regulations governing minimum instream flow requirements in the Russian River downstream of Lake Mendocino. As instream flow requirements below the confluence with Dry Creek (near Healdsburg), are met using water stored in Lake Sonoma, requirements below Healdsburg do not affect operation of Lake Mendocino. Accordingly, the Lake Mendocino operations model does not incorporate Lake Sonoma and the lower river reaches or the Russian River. Rather, the model evaluates the Lake Mendocino water surface elevation as impacted by minimum instream flow requirements in the Russian River above the confluence with Dry Creek. Minimum StreamfZow Requirements on the Russian River State Water Resources Control Board Decision 1610 (D-1610) specifies minimum instream flows on the Russian River conditioned on inflow to and storage in Lake Pillsbury and on storage 33 in Lake Mendocino. Flow rates in D-1610 range from as low as 25 cfs in a critically dry month to as high as 185 cfs in the spring with high reservoir levels. D-1610 was issued pursuant to permits for diversion held by the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA), and has been in effect since 1986. However, SCWA was directed by the September 24, 2008 Biological Opinion (BO) issued pursuant to the Endangered Species Act for anadromous salmonids in the Russian River to file a petition with the State Water Board to amend D-1610. As a directed in the BO, SCWA has filed a Petition and an Urgency Petition with the State Water Board for the purpose of reducing minimum flows for the Russian River above Dry Creek. The Petition requests that minimum instream flows during the months of June through October of an average water year be reduced from 150 or 185 cfs (depending on hydrological conditions) to 125 cfs. The State Water Board has not yet acted on this Petition, however, with respect to operation of Lake Mendocino and minimum instream flows, SCWA has been directed to operate under the terms of the BO. This analysis uses historical inflow to Lake Pillsbury and historical contents in Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino to calculate required minimum streamflows in the Russian River upstream of Dry Creek under both D-1610 and as requested in the BO. This calculation was applied to the full study period of 1961 through 2009, as if D-1610, signed April, 1986, was in effect for the entire period. Lake Mendocino Flood Control Operations USACE operates Lake Mendocino to reduce flood damages downstream by minimizing the amount and duration of water stored in the reservoir above the top of conservation pool. The top of conservation pool has been defined since 2002 as follows: • 68,400 acre-feet from the first of November through the end of February and • 86,400 acre-feet from the first of April through the middle of October. Figure 6 illustrates the historical content and top of conservation pool in Lake Mendocino since January 2000. Note that occasional encroachment of storage above the top of conservation pool is allowed to ameliorate flooding downstream of the reservoir. Note also the greater conservation storage allowed prior to 2002. For many years prior to 2002, the top of conservation pool was 72,300 acre-feet during the flood season and 91,000 acre-feet outside of the flood season. Finally, note that since the beginning of April 2010, the reservoir content has been far above the 86,400 acre-feet top of conservation pool. This higher summertime storage volume is in response to a request from SCWA, as indicated in Water Control Diagram found in the 2004 USACE Water Control Manual for Coyote Valley Dam. Insufficient information exists to determine whether this deviation from prior operations is a permanent change. In the modeling, the 2002 — 2009 evaluation implements the top of conservation storage rule. Because encroachment of storage into the flood control space is a discretionary action, it was not modeled. This approach does not affect the objectives of this evaluation, since the flood flows cannot be held to bolster supplies in the dry season, but will be passed downstream within days. WE Dry Season Release from Lake Mendocino Water is released from Lake Mendocino to satisfy the following: • senior water right holders, • D-1610 minimum streamflow requirements, • SCWA water intake below Dry Creek, • river losses in meeting the above described objectives. An evaluation of historical releases from Lake Mendocino to cover Russian River losses and required minimum river flow is included below to properly model future dry season releases from Lake Mendocino. Historical River Loss The Russian River flows through the Ukiah Valley, Sanel Valley, and Alexander Valley on its way from the Forks to the confluence with Dry Creek. During the dry season, the water surface elevation of the aquifers beneath the valleys declines, and water is lost from the river to the aquifer. To replace the river water lost to the aquifer and maintain the required minimum instream flow from the Fork to Dry Creek, SCWA releases water from Lake Mendocino. River losses are approximated by comparing USGS gage records at the Fork (the sum of two gages), Hopland, Cloverdale and Healdsburg, and calculating loss between the gages. Figure 7 shows the average daily river loss from the Forks to Healdsburg over the last two decades (since D-1610 was signed). The total average loss (i.e., the summation of the area under the curve) is about 16,000 acre-feet. The analysis uses daily historical river loss to project future river losses. In addition to releases necessary to replace river losses, excess dry season releases are required to meet minimum instream flow requirements as described below. Excess Da Season Release from Lake Mendocino Excess dry season releases from Lake Mendocino are required because the D-1610 minimum instream flow rate is considered an instantaneous rather than running mean requirement. Accordingly, additional water is released to ensure that the instantaneous instream flow meets the D-1610 minimum requirement. The historical excess flow satisfied through Lake Mendocino was evaluated by examining the historical record of gaged river flow and comparing that against the concurrent D-1610 flow requirement. As previously described, SCWA diversions downstream of Dry Creek are met principally from Lake Sonoma releases, and accordingly, this analysis does not consider dry season releases from Lake Mendocino greater than the minimum streamflow requirement above the confluence with Dry Creek plus the river loss. The following describes the results of the evaluation of river flow data. Figure 8 provides exceedence curves for each month, May through November, showing the flow in the Russian River in excess of the D-1610 requirement attributable to Lake Mendocino releases. The highest flow rates corresponded to wet conditions when water needed to be evacuated from the reservoir. The times of zero excess actually represent deficit, i.e., the minimum flow requirement was not met. It can be seen that there are many days of excess release in the 10 to 40 cfs range. Because the D-1610 flow rate requirement is considered an instantaneous requirement rather than a running mean requirement, there is a need to release more than exact requirement. Figure 9 demonstrates the historical consecutive day change in river loss between the Forks and Healdsburg. This is an indication of the rate of change that needs to be anticipated. The higher values correspond to the falling limb of storm hydrographs. The rate of river loss through the bed of the river channel will not change dramatically from day to day. Thus, the dry month curves (August, September) show the least change in net loss from one day to the next. Based on this figure, it was decided that 30 cfs was ample allowance for excess release from Lake Mendocino. Summary of Downstream Demand Used in the Lake Mendocino Operational Analysis The Lake Mendocino operational analysis incorporates the following components into the estimate of downstream demand for the dry season of May through November: 1. The required minimum streamflow, 2. The historical river loss experienced on that day, 3. The historical excess release on that day capped at no more than 30 cfs. A portion of the downstream demand is met by West Fork flows; the balance is met by modeled release from Lake Mendocino. Figures 10 and 11 summarize the modeled average monthly downstream demand. EVALUATION OF WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY The evaluation of water supply reliability incorporates the following assumptions, summarized below: 1. Potter Valley Project imports to the East Fork of the Russian River were incorporated as follows: a. The July 17 through March 6 imports are based on historical import values, as provided in Table 2 b. The March 7 through July 16 imports are based on the minimum rate required by the FERC license during the period 2. The model applied the top of conservation storage from the period 2002 through 2009 at Lake Mendocino. 3. The model applied a downstream demand during the dry season that included the following: a. Minimum required streamflow, b. The historical river loss, and we c. The historical excess release from Lake Mendocino (up to 30 cfs). Available Water: Lake Mendocino Projected Outflow Lake Mendocino projected outflow was estimated based on the components described in Section 2. For the purpose of determining whether sufficient water is available in Lake Mendocino to meet the City's projected increase in demand, the existing demand and the projected demand are compared using anticipated future operations of Lake Mendocino. Scenarios modeled are described below: Scenario Streamflow Requirements A D-1610 B D-1610 C Biological Opinion D Biological Opinion Ukiah Water Use Existing Max (4,200 of/yr) Projected (8,700 of/yr) Existing Max (4,200 af/yr) Projected (8,700 af/yr) The Scenarios are shown on the Figure 12, and indicate that sufficient water is available to the City to meet projected increases in demand regardless of the streamflow requirements. The determine the impact of the increased demand on the Russian River system, as demonstrated by reduction in water surface elevation in Lake Mendocino, as more water is released to satisfy the City, and additional evaluation was conducted, as described below. Impact of Increased City Diversion on the Russian River System As flows in the Russian River system are controlled to some degree by releases from Lake Mendocino, a significant reduction in water surface elevation and storage in Lake Mendocino could result in reduced flows in the Russian River. Accordingly, existing water use and projected water use were evaluated with respect to the Russian River hydrology to determine whether a change in water surface elevation would result from the City's increased diversion. The four Scenarios evaluated are described below: 37 Scenario Streamflow Requirements A D-1610 B D-1610 C Biological Opinion D Biological Opinion Ukiah Water Use Existing Max (4,200 of/yr) Projected (8,700 of/yr) Existing Max (4,200 af/yr) Projected (8,700 af/yr) The results of the evaluation are provided on Figure 13, and indicate no change in water surface elevation, except during the month of November. When comparing Scenarios C and D, a difference of two-tenths of a foot (0.2 ft) occurs in November, as a result of the City's increased water diversion. At the projected Lake elevation, 0.2 ft represents about 0.6 percent of the reservoir volume. Accordingly, the model demonstrates that the impact on lake storage attributable to Ukiah's increased water use is negligible. W S,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 s, 2,000 w 1,500 s, 1,000 500 0 o N't Ic x o N co o N o co o N o co o N o co 0 Calendar Year Figure 1 - City of Uriah Water Use 38 15% 14% 13% 12% 11% 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Figure 3 - City of Ukiah Monthly Pattern of Pumping and Resulting Depletion to Russian River KE 90000 80000 70000 y 60000 w U 50000 0 U 40000 on 0 30000 20000 10000 0 Figure 4 - Lake Pillsbury Target and Maximum Storage 40 250000 200000 150000 w a� U -!� 100000 50000 0 FIGURE 5 - Potter Valley Project Imports to East Fork Russian River N m co o N m co o — N m 11, V) �10 r-- co cl� o — N m 11, V) �10 r-- co o — N m 11, V) �10 r-- co o� 0000000000000000cococ c c c c c c c c c 0000 0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------N N N N N N N N N N Historical (avg = 138 kAF) � Projected (avg = 102 kAF) 41 FIGURE 6 - Historical Lake Mendocino Content 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Hist Content Top Cons Pool 42 43 FIGURE S. Historical Russian Minimum River Flow 1# Excess of D-1610 Requirement Attributable to Release from Lake Mendocino, 1988- 006 0 0% my 20% 30% 40% Soy 60% 7% my my 100% Percent «time 44 May June 2R August -- — Sept Oct Nov 30- \ ` () 150 \ § �! - 7 3 � - � ^ - / 10 - \ /250 - - - - - - - - - - �~\ \- A 50 0 0% my 20% 30% 40% Soy 60% 7% my my 100% Percent «time 44 May June 2R August -- — Sept Oct Nov ` 150 \ - 7 3 � - � ^ - / 10 - � � �- �~\ 50 § � ® - - - _ ®—e '® ; - � 0 0% my 20% 30% 40% Soy 60% 7% my my 100% Percent «time 44 May June 2R August -- — Sept Oct Nov 100 90 80 70 0 a 60 50 U A 40 U 0 30 La 20 10 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 45 May June July X August September October November El 47 FIGURE 13 - Lake Mendocino Modeled Elevation 48 Historical Scen A Scen B Scen C Scen D Table 1 Projected Total Annual Diversion Pursuant to Permit 12952 (Application 15704) 49 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug She Oct Nov Dec Total Avg. Monthly Water Use (%) 4.9% 4.4% 5.1% 6.2% 9.2% 11.5% 13.9% 13.7% 11.6% 9.0% 5.6% 5.0% 100.0% Diversion Rate (cfs) 7.1 6.3 7.4 8.9 13.2 16.5 20 19.6 16.7 12.9 8.1 7.2 -- Diversion Volume (af) 435 349 452 528 811 980 1,230 1,206 994 793 479 444 8,700 49 Table 2 - Estimated Annual Depletion Action Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Note a Pumped from Aquifer (% of annual use) 4.9% 4.4% 5.1% 6.2% 9.2% 11.5% 13.9% 13.7% 11.6% 9.0% 5.6% 5.0% 100.0% b Pumping Effect on River 24.8% 4.4% 5.1% 6.2% 9.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5% 24.9% 100.0% Jun -Oct delayed to Nov -Jan c Indoor Use (% of annual use) 4.9% 4.4% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 58.6% 'a! in January d Indoor Use Return to River (% of annual use) 12.3% 4.4% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3% 12.3% 56.1% Jun -Oct delayed to Nov -Jan; 10% loss in perc ponds e Outdoor Use (% of annual use) 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 1.2% 4.2% 6.5% 9.0% 8.7% 6.7% 4.0% 0.7% 0.1% 41.4% a - c f Outdoor Use Return to Aquifer (% of annual use) 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 1.8% 6.9% 15% return flow; Jun -Oct delayed to Nov -Jan g Depletion to River (% of annual use) 10.7% 0.0% 0.2% 1.1% 3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.7% 10.7% 37.0% b - d - f TABLE 3 Historical Potter Valley PowerHouse Import to East Fork of the Russian River Water Year Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total 1961 15,810 18,001 18,570 18,175 16,336 18,466 17,829 17,504 10,781 6,025 6,130 17,236 180,865 1962 18,543 13,426 18,458 18,871 16,693 18,466 16,645 7,289 8,691 11,764 11,976 9,871 170,694 1963 16,941 18,319 18,415 18,397 16,759 16,066 17,514 17,254 11,563 10,808 11,585 10,959 184,578 1964 12,896 16,176 18,022 18,568 17,102 14,729 3,693 3,064 2,345 6,500 7,233 8,904 129,232 1965 16,498 18,146 15,536 18,496 16,878 9,346 17,291 17,623 10,880 11,726 12,164 15,568 180,154 1966 17,398 10,770 13,613 18,506 16,812 17,794 17,962 13,170 6,189 10,800 11,843 16,040 170,897 1967 18,821 17,317 18,794 18,826 16,907 17,798 17,716 17,859 16,482 16,996 17,272 17,302 212,089 1968 15,723 10,414 17,834 18,621 17,421 18,474 11,057 3,590 5,148 11,230 11,319 11,244 152,076 1969 16,657 17,638 17,907 17,745 16,019 17,770 16,802 17,438 13,471 11,292 11,522 15,838 190,098 1970 17,817 14,901 12,940 17,842 16,362 17,685 5,980 4,700 6,449 6,535 7,130 14,511 142,853 1971 16,850 15,956 18,772 18,687 17,110 18,740 16,556 17,855 13,554 4,558 2,284 6,666 167,587 1972 9,552 10,506 15,182 18,479 13,218 17,970 15,520 13,850 4,182 13,345 9,437 15,733 156,973 1973 16,727 17,787 12,268 16,810 16,796 16,869 18,144 13,713 6,945 7,380 7,273 14,785 165,499 1974 6,254 1,445 18,829 15,700 13,600 17,718 17,849 17,833 14,734 4,708 3,780 13,466 145,917 1975 17,240 17,158 16,318 15,529 14,247 17,100 16,284 16,173 11,469 7,011 6,509 15,870 170,910 1976 18,113 17,627 17,604 8,255 5,588 7,242 6,555 2,339 2,991 4,050 4,685 10,919 105,968 1977 15,945 15,654 7,270 3,285 512 1,436 253 838 1,201 1,583 1,450 577 50,005 1978 804 2,233 9,402 17,147 16,138 17,717 17,752 18,482 16,328 8,896 8,813 11,859 145,572 1979 14,530 17,423 7,186 12,210 16,626 18,240 17,112 18,538 9,418 8,466 8,432 16,415 164,595 1980 16,897 16,763 18,443 18,062 17,379 18,286 17,957 16,009 10,987 6,056 3,348 15,154 175,339 1981 17,421 13,184 14,273 11,379 16,636 17,653 11,703 7,962 7,835 6,700 5,169 11,342 141,257 1982 19,579 16,548 19,117 19,434 18,052 19,698 19,270 19,593 18,456 8,281 8,791 15,039 201,859 1983 9,616 13,018 17,354 19,282 17,649 19,482 18,806 18,667 15,931 15,374 14,876 3,420 183,474 1984 4,439 10,974 16,279 19,206 18,191 19,446 15,256 5,934 3,208 4,843 9,899 7,186 134,861 1985 18,770 18,126 18,437 18,861 17,227 19,414 12,107 2,749 5,809 9,163 7,725 16,705 165,093 1986 18,490 9,667 15,656 14,291 13,946 19,240 10,603 5,658 6,055 6,033 5,678 8,951 134,268 1987 17,933 7,591 5,248 5,383 12,044 17,929 6,952 5,568 4,800 5,578 4,544 4,017 97,586 1988 6,064 5,359 15,759 17,500 17,020 8,392 4,854 5,966 5,891 5,389 5,009 4,883 102,087 1989 4,877 8,333 17,933 17,867 12,758 17,963 17,971 11,964 5,401 6,030 5,893 6,311 133,301 1990 16,144 11,492 9,142 16,390 16,644 16,685 3,193 6,788 13,151 4,594 6,060 16,786 137,068 1991 19,123 14,587 4,897 2,202 2,497 16,203 18,248 15,069 8,382 8,210 5,667 7,363 122,447 1992 15,743 11,681 5,002 8,366 12,879 19,772 15,192 11,193 6,024 7,075 6,284 5,816 125,026 1993 8,406 8,589 13,734 16,806 16,423 19,835 19,055 19,420 17,322 9,812 6,897 14,658 170,958 1994 18,335 12,049 10,885 8,513 11,546 13,990 5,597 5,978 3,513 3,695 7,168 3,949 105,220 1995 5,092 5,568 3,721 3,557 5,308 3,160 5,770 6,460 5,320 5,336 5,135 5,486 59,913 1996 5,439 7,672 12,522 16,070 18,333 19,569 19,295 18,601 11,929 8,571 9,285 17,036 164,323 1997 17,201 11,621 16,465 13,113 11,429 9,969 6,936 6,357 6,676 6,308 8,118 9,648 123,842 1998 9,557 17,338 16,263 18,084 14,737 20,236 19,464 18,157 18,292 8,303 7,293 12,012 179,735 1999 17,746 17,058 17,433 11,586 9,894 18,000 12,072 12,054 7,496 6,601 6,631 8,113 144,683 2000 10,127 12,750 11,711 13,002 16,657 17,877 10,441 10,251 6,867 6,857 6,986 7,807 131,333 2001 9,527 11,054 2,862 3,933 3,293 7,094 11,582 6,250 4,717 3,106 2,916 3,437 69,770 2002 5,486 11,709 18,183 17,128 17,276 18,335 6,990 5,371 4,199 4,227 4,425 4,292 117,622 2003 5,159 6,189 7,917 7,914 13,960 16,225 15,297 17,405 9,318 7,686 7,946 13,331 128,347 2004 10,292 9,352 16,828 18,250 14,620 16,860 10,401 6,454 5,227 5,256 5,540 5,879 124,961 2005 6,292 6,827 11,766 16,092 14,420 14,419 12,972 9,555 8,688 7,337 6,952 6,738 122,058 2006 6,770 5,590 3,464 11,006 12,333 9,156 12,240 13,337 7,045 6,861 6,690 7,097 101,590 2007 10,586 2,646 8,153 9,701 6,605 4,312 3,227 5,026 5,098 5,478 5,133 4,409 70,376 2008 3,160 2,396 2,646 9,116 7,700 4,080 2,495 4,336 6,050 5,935 5,968 5,135 59,017 2009 3,828 2,608 2,555 2,428 1,521 4,796 3,001 5,336 5,693 5,760 5,786 4,518 47,830 Average 12,678 11,821 13,216 14,177 13,676 15,259 12,601 11,073 8,535 7,431 7,319 10,210 137,996 Notes: Source: Water Year 1976-83, 1987-2009 USGS Gage #11471099 Water Year 1961-1975, 1984-86 estimated as USGS #11471000 reduced to reflect portion to Potter Valley Irrigation District 62 TABLE 4 Lake Mendocino Historical Inflows (acre-feet) Water Year Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Air May Jun Jul AugShe Total 1961 15,291 19,353 35,969 21,350 41,842 42,435 22,203 20,265 9,826 4,320 4,985 16,132 253,971 1962 17,572 14,573 26,744 23,752 47,408 43,770 20,896 7,835 7,942 10,217 10,630 8,803 240,140 1963 22,237 19,067 30,506 23,463 37,885 29,104 52,604 21,930 12,282 10,933 10,949 10,332 281,292 1964 12,984 26,918 19,950 37,988 20,182 17,477 5,252 3,437 1,478 4,538 5,865 8,172 164,242 1965 14,775 25,337 96,216 65,525 21,509 12,845 28,620 19,012 10,225 10,374 10,505 12,881 327,823 1966 15,652 15,517 19,055 53,211 32,595 24,258 19,752 12,554 5,106 10,253 11,421 15,894 235,267 1967 17,727 20,591 36,072 57,537 25,587 32,930 38,662 22,011 17,610 15,511 15,628 16,052 315,918 1968 14,920 10,306 19,006 38,010 36,419 29,417 14,027 4,923 3,354 10,824 12,266 11,782 205,255 1969 16,231 17,939 51,030 74,429 59,079 31,016 21,626 17,897 13,859 10,568 10,459 15,021 339,153 1970 17,677 15,279 35,955 110,638 33,783 27,946 9,350 5,778 5,816 5,651 6,651 14,093 288,615 1971 17,617 23,457 60,891 57,085 20,704 39,662 21,479 20,543 14,309 3,981 1,587 6,210 287,526 1972 9,243 11,687 23,838 28,255 23,586 26,599 19,936 14,519 3,677 10,780 9,755 14,694 196,569 1973 17,852 21,680 26,997 64,563 46,509 35,636 21,908 13,198 8,333 7,238 7,404 15,172 286,489 1974 7,525 21,212 51,285 58,690 30,369 58,767 43,072 22,183 16,003 5,960 4,259 15,079 334,404 1975 19,248 18,391 19,371 23,157 65,981 76,351 24,675 19,777 12,974 8,608 9,136 16,429 314,099 1976 18,938 19,262 19,958 10,469 14,061 16,023 11,157 3,586 2,660 3,447 5,709 11,171 136,441 1977 17,312 17,124 8,817 4,697 1,654 3,104 811 1,819 1,412 547 1,222 2,093 60,612 1978 1,785 4,659 25,052 84,933 57,155 44,674 36,534 22,035 16,386 7,625 7,988 11,738 320,563 1979 15,253 17,885 8,303 25,867 54,269 38,585 19,785 20,375 9,247 7,381 7,097 15,505 239,551 1980 19,688 29,925 34,350 67,522 55,677 38,063 24,560 19,200 12,312 7,684 5,417 16,082 330,481 1981 18,147 14,025 16,782 31,528 28,459 29,889 15,959 9,207 7,454 6,028 3,612 10,320 191,412 1982 19,482 47,749 61,721 52,842 50,875 43,841 67,869 20,926 17,913 8,398 8,797 15,781 416,194 1983 10,818 25,510 51,563 53,134 62,724 112,129 44,202 28,049 18,560 15,787 15,144 4,167 441,787 1984 6,042 36,889 64,059 25,595 31,587 30,199 20,140 8,583 8,053 4,637 9,634 6,843 252,262 1985 20,361 35,788 25,143 20,793 28,660 30,308 16,661 3,913 4,126 7,391 7,301 17,423 217,868 1986 19,488 13,266 22,340 33,747 107,186 56,230 15,327 6,968 5,590 5,375 4,871 9,529 299,917 1987 19,393 9,443 6,684 13,301 23,901 37,827 10,622 6,891 4,380 4,810 5,970 6,724 149,947 1988 9,021 7,859 36,899 51,859 20,886 9,503 7,295 8,426 7,260 6,357 5,808 5,314 176,486 1989 4,864 13,831 26,738 28,626 16,102 59,287 24,445 14,864 9,067 9,285 7,849 6,327 221,283 1990 17,756 12,302 10,148 26,232 28,398 23,824 3,719 8,287 13,644 2,860 4,314 16,465 167,949 1991 19,411 15,081 5,377 3,229 3,747 41,665 20,295 15,499 7,565 7,032 4,267 6,008 149,175 1992 15,912 13,387 5,937 10,407 37,181 29,397 17,415 13,091 6,895 8,301 7,099 6,835 171,856 1993 9,352 8,878 32,045 76,972 40,537 31,226 26,325 23,413 22,086 9,852 7,404 14,515 302,607 2of2 52 TABLE 4 Lake Mendocino Historical Inflows (acre-feet) Water Year Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Air May Jun Jul AugShe Total 1994 17,483 11,377 12,708 13,240 24,540 15,761 6,891 6,661 3,382 3,765 7,170 3,642 126,619 1995 4,933 7,730 10,606 87,312 12,325 68,423 19,018 17,959 7,123 5,363 5,709 5,488 251,988 1996 6,672 8,868 27,981 56,439 43,506 38,539 26,529 22,209 13,238 10,419 10,084 16,866 281,352 1997 16,671 12,802 40,755 68,111 19,589 17,147 8,432 7,313 6,496 5,395 8,430 9,689 220,831 1998 9,560 20,743 27,412 77,942 112,566 41,776 38,403 27,251 24,105 12,803 13,117 12,921 418,600 1999 17,941 17,504 23,477 20,987 59,025 48,780 25,165 13,877 8,220 7,724 8,959 11,272 262,931 2000 13,496 13,922 10,929 22,784 56,849 35,179 13,567 12,442 8,575 7,851 8,789 7,115 211,499 2001 9,695 14,023 5,256 9,225 21,251 19,240 13,161 7,488 5,687 4,364 3,939 4,223 117,552 2002 2,231 19,670 53,382 43,203 27,640 25,024 8,957 6,795 5,794 5,209 5,635 5,427 208,968 2003 5,917 5,911 45,152 37,637 23,310 27,872 41,390 31,423 11,318 9,842 8,723 13,990 262,484 2004 11,084 9,069 44,426 38,623 62,514 25,807 12,944 8,715 8,414 8,210 6,200 4,899 240,906 2005 8,737 6,647 28,723 39,394 24,137 34,108 26,164 23,491 14,232 9,209 6,811 7,024 228,678 2006 7,736 8,662 76,141 63,188 35,447 59,848 53,910 20,434 10,261 6,938 6,343 6,803 355,711 Average 13,733 16,980 30,908 42,119 37,591 36,119 22,646 14,501 9,657 7,601 7,628 10,629 250,115 (cfs) 223 285 503 685 677 587 381 236 162 124 124 179 346 Source: USACE. 2of2 53 N 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Groundwater Availability I - Ground water generally abundant. Production rate and supply sufficient for agricultural, industrial, municipal, and domestic uses II - Ground water generally available year-round at low production rates. Generally sufficient supply for domestic use, may provide adequate supply for irrigation or industrial use III - Ground water generally present, but production rates are extremely limited or ground water is only seasonally available; may provide sufficient supply for domestic use Groundwater e� eiletdlty digitized from Plate 2 of Ground -water resources in Mendocino County, CJ, fomie, Water -resources— tig.tion Report 85-4258. Fen'm'. C. D.. USGS. 1986. et a scale of 1"=2000'. Aeiel photograph per USDA-FSAAeriel Photography Field Office, fl.—J-2009. PLATE I City ofUkiah Groundwater Availabilty in the Ukiah Groundwater Basin Mendocino County, California W>�,r�cr ;I3taczsngnaore siii ir-------------------- ii5iiggg➢§ggg3g 45 Pa�a�tl aMxoplam. PLATE II Cityof Ukiah Groundwater Wells in Ukiah Valley M,,,docmo Cowry, Califomia Wa nd Bonsw- .• .. Ma�1011 City of Ukiah APPENDIX D - RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr City of Ukiah APPENDIX E - VERIFICATION OF PLAN SUBMITTAL pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr City of Ukiah APPENDIX F - WATER SHORTAGE EMERGENCY PLAN pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr ARTICLE 11. WATER SHORTAGE EMERGENCY 3600: FINDINGS: The City Council hereby finds and determines that the ordinary demands and requirements for water customers of the City may not, from time to time, be satisfied without depleting the water supply to the extent that there would be insufficient water for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection. This ordinance is intended to prohibit any additional demands on the existing water supply, to prohibit all nonessential uses as defined herein, and to allocate the available water supply during any water shortage emergency to the end that sufficient water will be and remain available for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3601: DEFINITIONS: For the purpose of this Article the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein: The word "shall" is always mandatory and never directory. A.Customer: The person using water supplied by the City. B.Director: The Director of Public Works of the City or his designated representative. C.Department: The Water Utilities Division of the Department of Public Works. D.Hand-Watering: Water supplied to a customer through a hose connected to the customer's piping system while such hose is hand held and such water used for exterior purposes. E.Irrigate: To water land, whether by channels, by flooding, by sprinkling, or any other means whatsoever except hand -watering. F.Water: Only water supplied by the City unless expressly provided otherwise or required by the context. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3602: DECLARATION OF WATER EMERGENCY: When it appears that the City may be unable to supply the normal demands and requirements of water customers, the City Council may, by resolution declare a water emergency. The resolution shall specify the degree of emergency existing and shall place into effect the appropriate provisions of this ordinance. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3603: REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY RESTRICTIONS OF WATER USE STAGE I: Whenever the City Council, by resolution, declares Stage I water emergency to exist, the Mayor shall issue a proclamation urging citizens to institute such water conservation measures on a voluntary basis as may be required to reduce water demand to coincide with available supply. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3604: PROHIBITION OF NONESSENTIAL WATER USE STAGE II: It is unlawful for any person to use water for any nonessential use as hereinafter defined, whenever the City Council determines by resolution that a Stage II water emergency exists. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3605: NONESSENTIAL USES DEFINED: The following uses of water are nonessential: A.Use of water from public hydrants for any purpose other than fire protection and/or prevention. B.Use of water through any meter when the consumer had been given two (2) days notice to repair one or more leaks and has failed to complete such repairs. C.Use of water by a golf course to irrigate any portion of its grounds except those areas designated as tees and greens; except where the Director shall have determined that any such use is nonessential and written notice of such determination shall have been provided. D.Use of water to irrigate grass, lawns, ground cover, shrubbery, vegetable gardens, trees, or other outdoor vegetation. E.Use of water for the construction of any structure, including such use in dust control. F.Use of water to wash any sidewalk, walkways, driveway, street, parking lot, tennis court, or other hard surfaced area by hosing or by otherwise direct use of water from faucets or other outlets. G.Use of water to wash any motor vehicle, trailer, airplane, or boat by hosing or otherwise using water directly from a faucet or other outlet. H.Use of water to fill or refill any swimming pool. I.Use of water to add to any swimming pool not equipped with and using a pool cover. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3606: FURTHER NONESSENTIAL USES DEFINED STAGE III: In addition to the nonessential uses set forth in §3605, the following additional uses are determined to be nonessential when the Council has, by resolution declared a State III emergency. A.Use of water in excess of the daily usage allotment hereinafter set forth: Single family or duplex (100 cu. ft. per month) 50 gallons - per permanent resident Multi -residential units (180 cu. ft. per month) 45 gallons - per permanent resident B.AII other uses not expressly set forth in §3605 shall be limited to fifty percent (50%) of the prior water use for a similar period as determined by the Department from its records. Where no such records exist, prior water use shall be deemed to be the average prior water use of similar existing services as shall be determined by the Department from its records. C.Use of water to irrigate, the provisions of §3605 above to the contrary, notwithstanding. D.Use of water for hand -watering. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3607: NUMBER OF PERMANENT RESIDENTS: Each customer in whose name water is supplied to a residence shall upon request of the Director advise him under penalty of perjury the number of permanent residents using water supplied to that residence. If such a residential customer shall fail to so advise the Director, such residence shall be permitted the water allocation herein provided for one permanent resident. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3608: TAMPERING WITH WATER METERS PROHIBITED: It is unlawful for any person to remove, replace, alter, damage, or otherwise tamper with any water meter or components thereof, including but not limited to the meter face, dials, or other water usage indicators, and any flow -restricting device installed thereon. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3609: VARIANCES: The Director may: A.Grant temporary variances for uses of water otherwise prohibited; or B.Adjust temporarily any or all consumer's allotment if he finds and determines that due to unusual circumstances to fail to grant such a variance would cause an emergency condition affecting health, sanitation, or fire protection of the applicant or the public; further, he may grant such adjustment in the case of a mixed residential/nonresidential use if he finds that such adjustment is necessary to place an equivalent allotment burden on said applicant. The City Council shall ratify or revoke any such variance or adjustment at its next scheduled meeting. No such variance or adjustment shall be retroactive or otherwise justify any violations of this ordinance occurring prior to issuance of said temporary variance or adjustment. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3610: VIOLATION OF WATER USE RESTRICTIONS; PUNISHMENT: It is a misdemeanor for any person to use or apply water received from the City contrary to or in violation of any restriction or prohibition specified in the Article, except both the first and second violations of this ordinance within any one year period shall be infractions. Said punishment may be in lieu of or in addition to any other penalty or method of enforcement provided by law. Any violation of this ordinance permitted to continue after notice, shall be a separate offense and shall be punishable as such hereunder; further, each day such violation continues shall be considered a separate offense. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3611: PURPOSE AND INTENT; STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION: It is the purpose and intent of this ordinance to prohibit an increase in the water demand on the City's water supply, to eliminate all nonessential water usage, and to provide for allocation of existing water resources to insure sufficient water for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection. This ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectuate such purpose and intent. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3612: REPAIR; REPLACEMENT: Notwithstanding any other provisions of this ordinance, no restriction or prohibition is imposed upon the repair or replacement of existing water service facilities in a manner which the Director determines will not materially increase the consumption of water. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3613: ORDINANCE CONTROLLING: The provisions of this ordinance shall prevail and control in the event of any inconsistency between this ordinance and any other rule, regulation, ordinance, or code of the City. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3614: WATER SERVICES TO BE DISCONNECTED: Water may be shut off by the Department with appropriate notice whenever the Director determines there has been a willful failure to comply with the provisions of this ordinance, any other provisions of this code to the contrary, notwithstanding. Charges for reconnection or restoration of service which has been terminated pursuant to this Section shall be at the rates and on the conditions set by resolution. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3615: ENFORCEMENT; DESIGNATED PERSONS: A.Each police officer of the City shall in connection with his duties imposed by law diligently enforce the provisions of this ordinance. B.The Director and his designated employees shall have the duty and are hereby authorized to enforce the provisions of this ordinance. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3616: SEVERABILITY CLAUSE: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more such provisions be declared unconstitutional. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) Urgency Ordinance This ordinance is hereby declared to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety and will take effect and be in force upon its adoption by a fourth -fifths (4/5) vote of the members of the Ukiah City Council. Due to severe drought conditions existing in the area from which the City draws its water supply, it is imperative that this ordinance become effective immediately to protect existing water supplies for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection. The City Council of the City further declares that if normal water usage were permitted to continue, the available water supply would be depleted below the safe level for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection. This ordinance shall be published in accordance with law within ten days after its adoption. (Ord. 691, §2, adopted 1977) City of Ukiah APPENDIX G - RESOLUTION NO. 2009-17, STAGE I WATER EMERGENCY pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr A'ITACHNIENT_ RESOLUTION NO.. 100947 RESOLUTION OF Tires CITY COUNCI OF THE CITY OF UKYAH DECLARING A LOCAL HNMRGENCY PURSUANT TO TIM EMERGENCY -SERVICES ACT AND A STAGE I WATER EMERGENCY UNDER. SECTION 3602 OF THE UXIAH CITY CODE WHEREAS, 1. Lake Mendocino and the Russian River are one current source of water for the .City -of Ukiah and the primary source of water for other domestic and agricultural users of water. in Mendocino and.Sonoma Counties; and ' 2. Average rainfall through March for the area contributing run-off to Lake MendoG— M` o is 42 inches and the rainfall total through March 2009 is 23 inohes;.and. 3. There have been below average rainfall and reduced storage in Lake Mendocino in 2004, 2007 and -2008; and 4. Average rainfall for April — June is 4..8 inches; and • 5. Even average rainfall for the remainder of the rainy season cannot compensate for the extremely lowraiufall this year; and 6. Lake Mendocino held approximately 53,000 acre feet on April 1, 2009, with a Lake level of 727.65 feet; and 7. The average Lake storage in April is 84,448 acre feet, the Lake storage in April 2007 was 66,617 acre feet and the average Lake storage in October is 55,854 acre feet, more water at the and of the dry summer season than is currently stored in the Lake; and 8. The historically low water storage level :in Lake Mendocino this year is part of a statewide water shortage caused by inadequate rainfall. which has prompted Governor Schwarzenegger to declare a statewide emergency under the Emergency Services Act due to these drought conditions; and 9. Mendocino County hasdeclared a local emergency due to drought conditions under the Bmergeucy Services Act; and 10. On April 6, 2009, the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB") has approved an Urgency Change. Petition filed by the Sonoma County Water Agency ("SCWA") to reduce in -stream flows in the Russian River to 75 cfs from April 6 -June 30, 2009 and to as low. as 25 cfs for the period July 1 -October 2, 2009, if cumulative total in#iow to Lake Mendocino is equal to or less than 25,000 acre feet for the period April 1 -June 30,2009; and 'ti. 11. The order approving temporarychanges to the minimum in -stream flows required by the appropriative rights. permits issued to.SCWA. is subject to several. conditions, including a condition requiring the SCWA to submit a plats by May 6, 2009, to the SWRCB to 'obtain the cooperation and participation of agricultm-al. and municipal Russian River water users to reach. a water conservation goal of 25 percent in Sonoma County and 50 percent in Mendocino County for the period of April 6, 2009 until.tbe expiration of this order (October 2.,2009)"-. and 12. A local emergency under the California Emergency .Servioes Act (Government Code §8550 let seq.) is defined in Section 8558(c). as the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety otpersons and property within the territorial limits of the City caused by such conditions as drought which are or are likely to be beyond. the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of individual Iocal governments and which require the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat; and 13. The historically low rainfall and water storage in hake Mendocino qualifies as a local emergency under the statutory definition; and . 14. 1n a declared local emergency, local agencies may provide"mutual aid as needed pursuant to. agreements or resolutions, state agencies may provide mutual aid to local agencies pursuant to agreement or at the direction of the Governor, costs incurred by the City in providing mutual aid pursuant to agreements or resolution constitute a charge against the state, when approved by the Governor in accordance with adopted regulations, and the City Council may promulgate .orders and regulations for the duration of the emergency to provide protection for life and property (see Government Code §§ 8631-86-394); and 15. In a declared local emergency, the City Council must review the state of the emergency not less than every 21 days after first declaring the emergency, and 16. Under Uldah City Code Section 3602, the City Council mayby.resolution declare a water emergency, specify the degree of emergency and place into effect the appropriate provisions of Division 4, Chapter 1., Article 11 of the Ukiah City Code pertaining to a Water Shortage Emergency; and 17. In -a Stage 1.water emergenoy the Mayor" issue a:proclamation urging citizens to institute such water conservation measures on a voluntary basis as may.be rewired to reduce water demand to coincide with available supply; and 18. The City Council has already authorized the development of a groundwater well on an emergency basis to provide the City with an additional water source this summer that does not rely on the Russian River or water stored in Lake.Mendoci no; and 19. Stage 11 and III water emergencies impose various mandatory conservation measures on City residents, including a prohibition on `honessential water use" in a Stage H water emergency and a limit on the daily use of water by different classes of water user in a Stage M emergency; and 20. The City can declare a Stage 11 or Stage II emergency, if voluntary measures or less sever mandatory measures does not achieve an adequate zeduatlon in the use of Russian River water or iri water use generally to meet.the available supply; . NOW, THERMORIE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Ukiah .hereby: L. Declares a local ernergenoy due to drought under the Emergency Service Act. 2. Declares a Stage I Water Storage Emergency under Uldah City Code Section 3602.. 3. Directs the City Manager: a. to identify and encourage.the use as a Russian River water user ofvoluntary measures to: reach a water conservation goal of 50 percent for the; period of April 6, 2009 to Ootober 2, 2009 ("Con arvation Period', and to report back to the City Council at each City Council meeting field during that same time period on the measures identified, the means used to encourage their use, the amount of water use reduction, and .the status of the emergency conditions;. b. to notify the City Council, if the City Manager determines that a Stage I Water Emergency is not reducing water use to match, the available supply and to. recommend a Stage II or M emergency, if necessary to achieve that level of water use; c, at City Council meetings. during, the Conservation Period to recommend temporary rules or orders to supplement or modify mandatory conservation measures in a Stage H or M. Water Storage Emergency to reduce water use to the available supply. and to achieve the conservation goals in Order.WR 2009-0027 DWR issued by the Division of Water Rights of the State Water Resources Control board; c.. to work with other local governments in the County, including the- incorporated cities and county water districts, to preserve as much water as possible for -use during the dry summer months and for the fall return of Chinook Salmon to the.Russian River; and d. to coordinate mutual aid efforts to address the local emergency between and among political subdivisions in Mendocino and Sonoma Counties and state agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED on April 15, 2009, by the following.roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Landis,.Thomas, Crane, Rodin, and Mayor Baldwin NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Philip E. aldwin, Mayor . .ATI"L LiktdQd1ty Clerk City of Ukiah APPENDIX H - 2009 ANNUAL WATER QUALITY REPORT pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ient/CAMkiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr REPORT,"'i.,, Waler leslwg, per lorrnecl in 2009 Presented By: CITY OF UKIAH PWS ID#: CA2310003 2009 Executive Summary The City of Ukiah, Public Works Department, Water Division, is responsible for providing a safe and reliable water supply to its customers. The Water Division consistently meets and exceeds State and Federal standards for drinking water quality. During the drought of 2009, Ukiah's water conservation program and the community as a whole were able to reduce water consumption by 35 percent over the summer and 20 percent for the entire year. We are continuing to see a significant reduction in the unnecessary use of water. Due to the drought and the low water levels in Lake Mendocino, the City of Ukiah believed it prudent to locate and develop new water sources. A new ground water well was added to the water system in 2009, and a second ground water well will be added in 2010. These new wells will enhance Ukiah's water system reliability, flexibility, and redundancy. They will also address new drinking water regulations and environmental concerns regarding the Russian River. The new EPA Ground Water Rule requires increased source water monitoring for fecal coliform bacteria and additional regulations to ensure safe drinking water. The City's ongoing sewer system inspection and repair program is also helping to address and prevent inadvertent contamination of surface and ground water sources. The Long Tenn 2 (LT2) Cryptosporidium and Giardia sampling and the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation 2 (UCMR2) sampling programs were completed in 2009. The test results have shown the City's water to be of excellent quality. We ask that you take a few minutes to read through this report to learn more about the quality of your drinking water. After all, well informed customers are our best allies. Regularly scheduled Ukiah City Council meetings convene on the first and third Wednesday of each month at 6 p.m. at the Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Ave., Ukiah, CA. These meetings provide citizens an opportunity to express concerns regarding the City's drinking water. uestII S ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ For more information about this report, or for any questions relating to your drinking water, please call Paul Smith, Water Treatment Plant Supervisor, at (707) 467-2842. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................s Where Does My Water Come r he City of Ukiah supplies its customers with water that is considered underflow from the Russian River as well as three ground water sources. The percentages delivered from each source, and when they are in use, is dependent on both the demand on the system and the time of year. There:. are times of emergency when the City may have to purchase water from our neighboring water systems. These systems would be Millview County Water District and: Willow County Water District. LT2 Rule The U.S. EPA has created the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2) for the sole purpose of reducing illness linked with the contaminant Cryptosporidium and other disease -causing microorganisms in drinking water. The rule will reinforce existing regulations and provide a higher level of protection of your drinking water supply. Sampling of our water source has shown the following Cryptosporidium: 0-4.3 oocysts Giardia lamblia: None detected E. coli: 0-12.2 colonies It is important to note that these results are from our raw water source only and do not reflect the quality of our treated drinking water supply. For more information, contact the U.S. EPNs Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791. Lead and Dri nki ng Water �f present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. We are responsible for providing high-quality drinking water but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at www. epa.gov/safe-,vater/lead. Source Water Assessment In June of 2001, the City of Ukiah completed a Source Water Assessment. This study considered the toporaphy, type of vegetative cover, soil type, type of animal life, and climate conditions of our watershed. Combined with human related recreation, industry, and life style, several areas were considered to have influence on our raw waters. The influence was considered to be minimal and several areas of concern have been mitigated. These include the closing of the landfill, the replacement of leaking underground storage tanks, and bulk fuel containment. The City is continually upgrading its system and monitors for a variety of possible hazards. The City's water is still considered safe and reliable. The summary from that report is as follows. Vulnerability Summary According to the results of the vulnerability analysis, the surface water source is considered most vulnerable (vulnerability score* of 15) to the following activities not associated with any detected contaminants: Gas stations; Plastic synthetic F Historic gas stations; Historic waste dumps/ landfills; Historic mining operations; Confirmed leaking tanks; Wastewater treatment and disposal facilities; Managed forests; Septic systems—high density (>I/acre); Chemical/petroleum processing/storage. The above list of the PCAs includes several activities that can contaminate the drinking water source by releasing deleterious chemicals. Therefore, this list corroborates the conclusion in the 2001 Update Report of Watershed Sanitary Update (Page 3): "The greatest potential threat of drinking water quality is that of a spill of deleterious material (e.g. petroleum products, hazardous or toxic substances) that could enter Lake Mendocuro or the Russian River. The potential threat is great because the water treatment systems used by the City, the RVCWD, and the MCWD were not designed to remove these types of substances." Further, the comparison of the above list of PCAs and that of "potential contaminant sources" delineated in the 2001 Update Re ort (Page 2) shows that some activities appear in both lists: (1) wastewater treatment and disposal facilities, (2) septic systems—high densiV, and (3) releases from industrial activities. The category of `releases from industrial activities" in the 2001 Update Report list encompasses some specific activities in the PCAs list, including gas stations, historic gas stations, confirmed leaking tanks, plastic synthetic producers, and chemical/petroleum processing/storage. Other activities in the 2001 Update Report list also ranked high in the Vulnerability Score, including septic systems—low density (vulnerability score of 13), grazing animals (13), non -body and body contact recreation (13), spills from traffic or railroad accidents (11), and pesticide/herbicide use in agriculture (11). *The drinking water source is considered Vulnerable to all PCAs with Vulnerability Score greater than or equal to 11 (California Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection Program). The apparent discrepancies between the two lists, such as managed forests, historic mining operations, and historic waste dumps/landfills, may be attributable to the fact that surface protection zones were not established in this assessment. If you would like to view the entire report, a copy is available at HS fi City Hall or through the local CDeld office in Santa Rosa. Substances That Could Be in Water he sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and the State Department of Public Health (Department) prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. Department regulations also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that must provide the same protection for public health. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. Contaminants that may be present in source water include: Microbial Contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife; Inorganic Contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally occurring or can result from urban stornrwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming; Pesticides and Herbicides, that may come from a variety of sources, such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses; Organic Chemical Contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production and which can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, agricultural applications, and septic systems; Radioactive Contaminants, that can be naturally occurring or can be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the U.S. EPAs Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791. Important Health Information ome people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immunocompromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants may be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. The U.S. EPA/CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791 or www.epa.gov/safewater/hotline/. Sampling Results Dwring the past year we have taken hundreds of water samples in order to determine the presence of any radioactive, biological, inorganic, volatile organic, or synthetic organic contaminants. The table below shows only those contaminants that were detected in the water. The state requires us to monitor for certain substances less than once per year because the concentrations of these substances do not change frequently. In these cases, the most recent sample data are included, along with the year in which the sample was taken. Chloride (ppm) 1 2009 _ 2009 i 500 NS - 4.7 120 NA - 7.65' 2004 - 6.6-87 6.4 NA - No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; NA Calcium (ppm) 2009 - 18 NA - 25.5' 22-29' - 19 NA Hardness as CaCO3 (ppm) 2009 - 85 NA - 140' seawater influence Color (Units) NA 2007 1 15 NS - NA 18' NA - ND NA ND -6 NA I NA - No Naturally occurring organic materials Corrosivity (Units) 14 2009 Non -corrosive NS - 10.54 NA - 10.71' 10.46-10.96' 10.93 NA - No Natural or industrially influenced balance of of the filtration system. 'The sample sites used were single family residences that were plumbed with copper pipes and lead solder, installed prior to 1983. 'Sampled in 2008. hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen in the water; affected by temperature and other factors Specific Conductance 1 2009 1 1,600 1 NS - 200 1 NA - 320` 240-330` 230 NA - No Substances that form ions when in water; (micromhos) - - - seawater influence Sulfate (ppm) 2009 1 500 NS - 10 NA - 18' 14-22' 11 NA - No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes Total Dissolved Solids 2009 1,000 NS - 74 NA - 185' 150-210' 130 NA - No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits (ppm) Turbidity (NTU) 2009 5 NS - NA NA - 0.123 0.028-1.0 NA NA - No Soil runoff Bicarbonate Alkalinity (ppm) 1 2009 _ 100 NA - 185' 130-190' - 120 NA Boron (ppb) 2004 - 130 120-140 - 110 110-460 - NA NA Calcium (ppm) 2009 - 18 NA - 25.5' 22-29' - 19 NA Hardness as CaCO3 (ppm) 2009 - 85 NA - 140' 114-148' - 89 NA Magnesium (ppm) 2009 - 9.5 NA - 18' 13-18' - 10 NA Sodium (ppm) 2009 - 8.8 NA - 14' 11-16' - 14 NA Sampled in 2007. 2Turbidity is a measure of the suspended particles in the water. Monitoring is essential to indicate the effectiveness of the filtration system. 'The sample sites used were single family residences that were plumbed with copper pipes and lead solder, installed prior to 1983. 'Sampled in 2008. Er-OffEr-Off e AL (Regulatory Action Level): The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow. pS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter): A unit expressing the amount of electrical conductivity of a solution. MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLS are set as close to the PHGs (or MCI -Gs) as is economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLS (SMCLs) are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water. MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level Goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCI -Gs are set by the U.S. EPA. micromhos: A measure of electrical conductance. MRDL (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. MRDLG (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal): The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. NA. Not applicable ND (Not detected): Indicates that the substance was not found by laboratory analysis. NS: No standard. NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units): Measurement of the clarity, or turbidity, of water. Turbidity in excess of 5 NTU is just noticeable to the average person. PDWS (Primary Drinking Water Standard): MCLS and MRDLs for contaminants that affect health, along with their monitoring and reporting requirements and water treatment requirements. PHG (Public Health Goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California EPA. ppb (parts per billion): One part substance per billion parts water (or micrograms per liter). ppm (parts per million): One part substance per million parts water (or milligrams per liter). TT (Treatment Technique): A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. City of Ukiah APPENDIX I - ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES 1, 2, 6, AND 14 pw://Carollo/Documents/CI ienUCA/Ukiah/8660B00/Deliverables/AppCvr Demand Management Measures Cost -Benefit Analysis ASSUMPTIONS COMMON TO ALL DMMS General Assumptions 1) Each DMM is implemented by itself e.g. not combined with other DMMs 2) When unavailable in the 2005 UWMP, values were derived (as noted) from the BMP Cost and Savings Study, A Guide to Data and Methods for Cost -Effectiveness Analysis of Urban Water Conservation Best Management Practices, Prepared for the California Urban Water Conservation Council, A & N Technical Services, March 2005 Specific Assumptions Values highlighted in orange on the following pages were assumed due to lack of data Value Units Comments Avoidable Supply Acquisition Costs 0 $/AF No Additional Supplies Needed per Cit Avoided Water Capacity Expansion Cost 0 $/AF No Additional Capacity Needed per Cit Avoided Wastewater Capacity Expansion Cost 0 $/AF No Additional Capacity Needed per Cit Annual Water Chemical Costs 42,000 $ Per Cit Annual WW Chemical Costs 120,000 $ Per Cit Annual Energy Costs for Water System 350,000 1 $ I Per Cit Environmental Benefits per AF of water saved 50 $/AF jEstimate Agency Discount Rate 2.5 % Estimate Social Discount Rate 2 % lEstimate Staff Hourly Rate including Overhead 75 $ jEstimate Values highlighted in orange on the following pages were assumed due to lack of data DMM 1 Residential Surveys Step 1 -Annual Costs Administration Costs 1. Staff hours to administer the survey program 200 hrs/yr 2. Staff hourly rate, including overhead $ 75 /hr 3. Administration costs $ 15,000 /yr (Line 1 x Line 2) Single Family Field Labor Costs Surveys 4. Field labor hours 73 hrs/yr 5. Field labor hourly rate, including overhead $ 75.00 /hr 6. Field labor cost $ 5,437.50 /yr (Line 4 x Line 5) Single Family Materials Costs Surveys 7. Unit cost of materials' (e.g., retrofit kits, lawn kits, nozzles) 8. Number of surveys2 9. Total materials cost (Line 7 x Line 8) Publicity Costs 10. Marketing collateral cost (e.g., brochure design, printing, web services) 11. Advertising cost (i.e. newspaper, radio, TV, web) 12. Total publicity costs (Line 10 + Line 11) Evaluation and Followup Costs 13. Labor & Consultant costs 14. Total Costs (Line 3 + Line 6 + Line 9 + Line 12 + Line 13) Program Cost Sharing Multi Family Surveys 14 hrs/yr $ 75.00 /hr $ 1,031.25 /yr Multi Family Surveys $ 55.00 /unit $ 55.00 /unit 58 /yr 11 /yr $ 3,190 /yr $ 605 /yr $ 4,000 /yr $ 1,000 /yr $ 5,000 /yr $ 5,000 /yr $ 35,264 /yr 15. Cost Share from Others $ - /yr (e.g., other agencies, grants, in-kind contrib.) 16. Net Agency Cost $ 35,264 /yr (Line 14 - Line 15) Notes: 1) Per 2005 UW MP 2) Requirement of 1.5% of all residential customers per year; 3,814 SFR accounts and 673 MFR accounts in SFR: 0.015 x 3,814 = 58 surveys MFR: 0.015 x 673 = 11 surveys DMM 1 Residential Surveys steD Z - t;ustomer water savinas Notes: 1) Per 2005 CUWCC BMP Cost Savings Study Update - targeting high users 2) Per 2005 CUWCC BMP Cost Savings Study Update Single Family Multi Family Surveys Surveys 1. Reduction in Avg. Use' 32.00 gpd 32.00 gpd (gallons per day per residential unit) 2. Savings Decay2 25.00 %/yr 25.00 %/yr 3. Number of Surveys 58.00 11.00 (from STEP 2 Line 8) 4. Lifetime Savings 8.31 AF 1.58 AF Notes: 1) Per 2005 CUWCC BMP Cost Savings Study Update - targeting high users 2) Per 2005 CUWCC BMP Cost Savings Study Update DMM 1 Residential Surveys Step 3 - Agency Benefits Avoided Supply Acquisition Costs (include future avoided capital costs as appropriate) 1. Marginal Source of Suppy' None (List name) 2. Avoidable Supply Acquisition Cost2 $ 0 /AF Avoided Treatment & Distribution Capacity Costs 3. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 $ 0 /AF (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) Avoided Wastewater Capacity Costs (if service provided by agency) 4. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 $ 0 /AF (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) Avoided Treatment & Distribution Variable Costs (include wastewater services if provided by agency) Avoided chemical costs 5. Total annual chemical costs2 $ 42,000.00 /yr 6. Annual fixed costs for chemicals $ - /yr 7. Annual chemical costs not related to water production $ - /yr 8. Avoidable chemical costs $ 42,000.00 /yr (Line 5 - Line 6 - Line 7) 9. Average annual treated water use 2952 AF 10. Unit Cost of Chemicals $ 14.23 /AF (Line 8 _ Line 9) Avoided energy costs 11. Annual energy costs2 $ 350,000.00 /yr 12. Annual fixed costs $ - /yr 13. Annual energy costs not related to water production $ - /yr (e.g., lighting, heating/cooling) 14. Avoidable energy costs $ 350,000.00 /yr (Line 11 - Line 12 - Line 13) 15. Average annual water use 2,952.00 AF (from Line 9 above) 16. Unit Cost of Energy $ 118.56 /AF (Line 14 _ Line 15) 17. Avoided Treatment & Distribution Variable Costs2 $ 160.00 /AF 18. Total Supply & Wastewater Benefits $ 160.00 /AF (Line 2 + Line 3 + Line 4 + Line 17) Environmental Benefits 19. Environmental benefit per AF saved $ 50 /AF (e.g. value of instream flow, improved water quality, avoided environmental mitigation for supply development or wastewater disposal) Notes: 1) No new supply sources needed 2) As described in "Assumptions for all DMMs" DMM 1 Residential Surveys Step 4 - Other Benefits & Costs OTHER BENEFITS Avoided Customer Energy Costs Single Family Multi Family Surveys Surveys 1. Hot water use as a percent of meter water savings 2% 2 % 2. Percent of residential hot water heated with gas' 90% 90 % 3. Marginal cost per therm $ 1.5 /therm 4. Marginal cost per KWh $ 0.12 /KWh 5. Customer Energy Benefit $ 47.02 /AF $ 47.02 /AF Avoided Wastewater Utility Variable Costs (IMPORTANT: do not include those listed in STEP 3 Agency Benefits) 6. Avoided energy & chemical costs $ 0 /AF of conserved water Avoided Wastewater Utility Capacity Costs (IMPORTANT: do not include those listed in STEP 3 Agency Benefits) 7. Avoided wastewater capacity expat $ 0 /AF of conserved water OTHER COSTS Single Family Multi Family Customer participation costs Surveys Surveys 8. Average customer expenditures per survey $ 100 /Survey 100 /Survey (e.g., change landscaping, appliances, etc) 9. Number of surveys 58.00 /yr 11.00 /yr (from Line 8 of STEP 1) 10. Total customer costs $ 5,800.00 /yr $ 1,100.00 /yr Line 8 x Line 9 Notes: 1) Source: http://websafe.kemainc.com/RASSWEB/DesktopDefault.aspx; data is for SCE) DMM 1 Residential Surveys Step 5 - Discounting Information Discount Rates (required) 1. Agency Discount Rate 2.5 % 2. Social Discount Rate 2.0 % Annual Escalation Rates (optional) 3. Avoided cost of water and wastewater - %/yr 4. Environmental benefits - %/yr 5. Energy cost - %/ yr DMM 1 Residential Surveys Jteri G - Meview Mebuitb Program Present Value Costs 1. Total surveys 2. Total water savings 3. Agency program costs 4. Customer program costs 5. Cost share 6. Net Program Cost Program Present Value Benefits Agency Perspective 69 9.9 AF $35,264 NA $0 $35,264 7. Agency supply & wastewater benE $1,474 8. Environmental benefits $461 9. Customer program benefits NA 10. Other utility benefits NA 11. Total benefits $1,935 12. Net Present Value (Line 11 - Line 6) 13. Benefit -Cost Ratio (Line 11 _ Line 6) 14. Simple Unit Supply Cost (Line 6 _ Line 2) ($33,329) 0.05 $3,568 /AF Society Perspective 69 9.9 AF $35,264 $6,900 NA $42,164 $1,494 $467 $439 $0 $2,400 ($'9,764) M. $4,266 /AF 15. Discounted Unit Supply Cost $3,827 /AF $4,515 /AF (Line 6 _ discounted water savings) This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Agency Perspective This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Society Perspective DMM 2 Residential Plumbing Retrofit Step 1 -Annual Costs Administration Costs 1. Staff hours to administer the retrofit program 100 hrs/yr 2. Staff hourly rate, including overhead $ 75.00 /hr 3. Administration costs $ 7,500 /yr (Line 1 x Line 2) Single Family Multi Family Field Labor Costs Plumbing Retrofits Plumbing Retrofits 4. Field labor hours' (e.g. kit distribution, direct installation) 5. Field labor hourly rate, including overhead 6. Field labor cost (Line 4 x Line 5) Materials Costs 7. Unit cost of materials (e.g., plumbing retrofit kits, nozzles, etc.) 8. Number of kits distributed 9. Total materials cost (Line 7 x Line 8) Publicity Costs 191 hrs/yr 34 hrs/yr $ 75.00 /hr $ 75.00 /hr $ 14,325 /yr $ 2,550 /yr Single Family Multi Family Plumbing Retrofits Plumbing Retrofits $ 20.00 /unit $ 20.00 /unit 191 /yr 34 /yr $ 3,820 /yr $ 680 /yr 10. Marketing collateral cost $ 2,000 /yr (e.g., brochure design, printing, web services) 11. Advertising cost $ 1,000 /yr (i.e. newspaper, radio, TV, web) 12. Total publicity costs $ 3,000 /yr (Line 10 + Line 11) Evaluation and Followup Costs 13. Labor & Consultant costs $ 5,000 /yr 14. Total Costs $ 36,875 /yr (Line 3 + Line 6 + Line 9 + Line 12 + Line 13) Program Cost Sharing 15. Cost Share from Others $ - /yr (e.g., other agencies, grants, in-kind contrib.) 16. Net Agency Cost $ 36,875 /yr (Line 14 - Line 15) Notes: 1) Assuming 1 hour per kit for assembling materials, delivery, and installation 2) Required 5% of all residences per year for 10 years per 2005 UW MP; 3,814 SFR accounts and 673 MFR accounts in 2010. SFR: 0.05 x 3814 = 191 surveys MFR: 0.05 x 673 = 34 surveys DMM 2 Residential Plumbing Retrofit Step 2 - Customer Water Savings Single Family Multi Family Plumbing Retrofits Plumbing Retrofits 1. Reduction in Avg. Use' 13.70 gpd (gallons per day per residential unit) 40 2. Savings Decay2 40 %/yr 3. Number of Kits Distributed 191 (from STEP 1 Line 8) %/yr 4. Percent of Kits Installed 100 %/yr 5. Lifetime Savings 7.33 AF 13.70 gpd 40 %/yr 34 100 %/yr 1.30 AF Notes: 1) From 2005 UWMP; Similar to results of indoor retrofits in the 2005 CUWCC BMP Cost Savings Study 2) Per 2005 CUWCC BMP Cost Savings Study Update DMM 2 Residential Plumbing Retrofit Step 3 - Agency Benefits Supply Acquisition Costs (include future avoided capital costs as appropriate) 1. Marginal Source of Supply' (List name) 2. Avoidable Supply Acquisition Cost2 sided Treatment & Distribution Capacity Costs 3. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) None $ 0 /AF $ 0 /AF ded Wastewater Capacity Costs (if service provided by agency) 4. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 $ 0 /AF (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) ded Treatment & Distribution Variable Costs (include wastewater services if provided by agency voided chemical costs Annual energy costs2 $ 5. Total annual chemical costs2 $ 42,000.00 /yr 6. Annual fixed costs for chemicals $ - /yr 7. Annual chemical costs not related to water production $ - /yr 8. Avoidable chemical costs $ 42,000.00 /yr (Line 5 - Line 6 - Line 7) 14. Avoidable energy costs 9. Average annual treated water use /yr 2952 AF 10. Unit Cost of Chemicals $ 14.23 /AF 15. (Line 8 _ Line 9) 2,952.00 voided energy costs 11. Annual energy costs2 $ 350,000.00 /yr 12. Annual fixed costs $ - /yr 13. Annual energy costs not related to water production $ - /yr (e.g., lighting, heating/cooling) 14. Avoidable energy costs $ 350,000.00 /yr (Line 11 - Line 12 - Line 13) 15. Average annual water use 2,952.00 AF (from Line 9 above) 16. Unit Cost of Energy $ 118.56 /AF (Line 14 _ Line 15) 5. Avoided Treatment & Distribution Variable Costs2 $ 160.00 /AF (Line 10 + Line 16) 6. Total Supply & Wastewater Benefits $ 160.00 /AF (Line 2 + Line 3 + Line 4 + Line 17) Environmental Benefits 7. Environmental benefit per AF saved $ 50 /AF (e.g. value of instream flow, improved water quality, avoided environmental mitigation for supply development or wastewater disposa Notes: 1) No new supply sources needed 2) As described in "Assumptions for all DMMs" DMM 2 Residential Plumbing Retrofit Step 4 - Other Benefits & Costs OTHER BENEFITS Avoided Customer Energy Costs Single Family Multi Family Plumbing Retrofits Plumbing Retrofits 1. Hot water use as a percent of total plumbing device water savings 2% 2% 2. Percent of residential hot water heated with gas' 90 % 90 % 3. Marginal cost per therm $ 1.50 /therm 4. Marginal cost per KWh $ 0.1204 /KWh 5. Customer Energy Benefit $ 47.05 /AF $ 47.05 /AF )ided Wastewater Utility Variable Costs (IMPORTANT: do not include those listed in STEP 3 Agency Benefits) 6. Avoided energy & chemical costs $ 0 /AF of conserved water )ided Wastewater Utility Capacity Costs (IMPORTANT: do not include those listed in STEP 3 Agency Benefits) 7. Avoided wastewater capacity expansion $ 0 /AF of conserved water OTHER COSTS Customer participation costs 8. Average customer expenditures per kit installed (e.g., change landscaping, appliances, etc) 9. Number of kits distributed (from Line 8 of STEP 1) 10. Percent of Kits Installed (from Line 4 of STEP 2) 11. Total customer costs Single Family Multi Family Plumbing Retrofits Plumbing Retrofits $ 0 /kit 0 /kit 191 /yr 34 /yr 100 %/yr 100 %/yr $ - /yr $ - /yr Notes: 1) Source: http://websafe.kemainc.com/RASSWEB/DesktopDefault.aspx; data is for SCE) DMM 2 Residential Plumbing Retrofit Step 5 - Discounting Information Discount Rates (required) 1. Agency Discount Rate 2.5 % 2. Social Discount Rate 2.0 % Annual Escalation Rates (optional) 3. Avoided cost of water and wastewater - %/yr 4. Environmental benefits - %/yr 5. Energy cost - %/ yr DMM 2 Residential Plumbing Retrofit Step 6 - Review Results Agency Society Program Present Value Costs Perspective Perspective 1. Total devices distributed 225 225 2. Total water savings 8.6 AF 8.6 AF 3. Agency program costs $36,875 $36,875 4. Customer program costs NA $0 5. Cost share $0 NA 6. Net Program Cost $36,875 $36,875 Program Present Value Benefits 7. Agency supply & wastewater benefits $1,332 $1,341 8. Environmental benefits $416 $419 9. Customer program benefits NA $394 10. Other utility benefits NA $0 11. Total benefits $1,748 $2,155 12. Net Present Value ($35,12 7) ($34 720) (Line 11 - Line 6) 13. Benefit -Cost Ratio 0.05 0.06 (Line 11 _ Line 6) 14. Simple Unit Supply Cost $4,272 /AF $4,272 /AF (Line 6 _ Line 2) 15. Discounted Unit Supply Cost $4,429 /AF $4,398 /AF (Line 6 _ discounted water savings) This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Agency Perspective This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Society Perspective DMM 6 High Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs STEP 1 -Annual Program Costs Administration Costs 1. Staff hours to administer the rebate program 100 hrs/yr 2. Staff hourly rate, including overhead $ 75.00 /hr 3. Administration costs $ 7,500 /yr (Line 1 x Line 2) Washing Machine Rebate Costs 4. Rebate (or utility incentive cost)' $ 75 /rebate 5. Number of rebates distributed 38 /yr 6. Total rebate cost $ 2,850 /yr (Line 4 x Line 5) Rebate Processing Costs 7. Average rebate processing cost (if not included in $ 20 /rebate Admin. Costs) 8. Total rebate processing cost $ 760 /yr (Line 5 x Line 7) Publicity Costs 9. Marketing collateral cost $ 4,000 /yr (e.g., brochure design, printing, web services) 10. Advertising cost $ 1,000 /yr (i.e. newspaper, radio, TV, web) 11. Total publicity costs $ 5,000 /yr (Line 9 + Line 10) Evaluation and Followup Costs 12. Labor & Consultant costs $ 5,000 /yr 13. Total Costs $ 21,110 /yr (Line 3 + Line 6 + Line 8 + Line 11 + Line 12) Program Cost Sharing 14. Cost Share from Others $ - /yr (e.g., other agencies, grants, in-kind contrib.) 15. Net Agency Cost $ 21,110 /yr (Line 13 - Line 14) Notes: 1) Per 2005 UW MP 2) Per 2005 UW MP: One percent of all SFR customers DMM 6 High Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs Step 2 - Water Savings Worksheet High -Efficiency Washing Machines 0 Use CUWCC Reliable Savings Estinjat 1. Savings per machine 5,250.00 gpy/machin (gallons per year per machine) O Use Own Estimate 2. Useful Life' 12 yrs 3. Number of Rebates Distributed 38 (from STEP 1 Line 5) 4. Percent Free-riders2 35 %/yr 5. Lifetime Savings 4.77 AF Notes: 1) Per 2005 UWMP 2) Per 2005 CUWCC BMP Cost Savings Study Update DMM 6 High Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs Step 3 - Agency Benefits Avoided Supply Acquisition Costs (include future avoided capital costs as appropriate) 1. Marginal Source of Suppy' None 2. Avoidable Supply Acquisition Cost2 $ 0 /AF Avoided Treatment & Distribution Capacity Costs 3. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 $ 0 /AF (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) Avoided Wastewater Capacity Costs (if service provided by agency) 4. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 $ - /AF (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) Avoided Treatment & Distribution Variable Costs (include wastewater services if provided by agency) Avoided chemical costs Annual energy costs2 $ 5. Total annual chemical costs2 $ 42,000.00 /yr 6. Annual fixed costs for chemicals $ - /yr 7. Annual chemical costs not related to water production $ /yr 8. Avoidable chemical costs $ 42,000.00 /yr (Line 5 - Line 6 - Line 7) 14. Avoidable energy costs 9. Average annual treated water use /yr 2952 AF 10. Unit Cost of Chemicals $ 14.23 /AF 15. (Line 8 _ Line 9) 2,952.00 Avoided energy costs 11. Annual energy costs2 $ 350,000.00 /yr 12. Annual fixed costs $ - /yr 13. Annual energy costs not related to water production $ - /yr (e.g., lighting, heating/cooling) 14. Avoidable energy costs $ 350,000.00 /yr (Line 11 - Line 12 - Line 13) 15. Average annual water use 2,952.00 AF (from Line 9 above) 16. Unit Cost of Energy $ 118.56 /AF (Line 14 _ Line 15) 17. Avoided Treatment & Distribution Variable Costs $ 132.79 /AF (Line 10 + Line 16) 18. Total Supply & Wastewater Benefits $ 132.79 /AF (Line 2 + Line 3 + Line 4 + Line 17) Environmental Benefits 19. Environmental benefit per AF saved $ 50 /AF (e.g. value of instream flow, improved water quality, avoided environmental mitigation for supply development or wastewater disposal) Notes: 1) No new supply sources needed 2) As described in "Assumptions for all DMMs" DMM 6 High Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs Step 4 - Other Benefits and Costs OTHER BENEFITS Avoided Customer Energy Costs High Efficiency Clothes Washer 1. Percent of residential hot water heated with gas' 89.5 % 2. Percent of residential dryers using gas' 61.8% 2. Marginal cost per therm of gas $ 1.50 /therm 3. Marginal cost per KWh of electricity $ 0.12 /KWh 5. Customer Energy Benefit $ 45.77 /Yr Avoided Wastewater Utility Costs (IMPORTANT: do not include those listed in STEP 3 Agency Benefits) 6. Avoided energy & chemical costs 7. Avoided wastewater capacity expansion 8. Total avoided wastewater utility costs (Line 6 + Line 7) $ 0 /AF of conserved water $ 0 /AF of conserved water $ - /AF of conserved water Notes: 1) Source: http://websafe.kemainc.com/RASSWEB/DesktopDefault.aspx; data is for SCE) 2) As described in "Assumptions for all DMMs" DMM 6 High Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Prograi Step 5 - Discounting Information Discount Rates (required) 1. Agency Discount Rate 2.5 % 2. Social Discount Rate 2.0 % Annual Escalation Rates (optional) 3. Avoided cost of water and wastewater - %/yr 4. Environmental benefits - %/yr 5. Energy cost - %/yr DMM 6 High Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs Step 6 - Summary of Costs & Benefits Present Value Costs 1. Total rebates distributed 2. Total water savings 3. Agency program costs 4. Customer program costs 5. Cost share 6. Net Program Cost 7. Agency supply & wastewater benefitE 8. Environmental benefits 9. Customer program benefits 10. Other utility benefits 11. Total benefits 12. Net Present Value (Line 11 - Line 6) 13. Benefit -Cost Ratio (Line 11 _ Line 6) 14. Simple Unit Supply Cost (Line 6 _ Line 2) Agency Perspective 38 4.8 AF $21,110 NA $0 $21,110 $542 $204 NA NA $746 ($20,'64) IiIIiLl $4,421 /AF Society Perspective 38 4.8 AF $21,110 NA NA $559 $210 $18,392 $0 $19,161 $4,421 /AF 15. Discounted Unit Supply Cost $5,172 /AF $5,017 /AF (Line 6 _ discounted water savings) This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Agency Perspective This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Society Perspective DMM 14 ULFT Replacement Programs Step 1 -Annual Costs Administration Costs 1. Staff hours to administer the rebate program $ 200 hrs/yr 8. 2. Staff hourly rate, including overhead $ 75.00 /hr (Line 5 x Line 7) 3. Administration costs $ 15,000 /yr (Line 1 x Line 2) 9. Marketing collateral cost $ 1,000 ULFT Costs (e.g., brochure design, printing, web services) Single -Family Multi -Family 4. ULFT Cost (or incentive cost) $ 100 /ULFT $ 100 /ULFT 5. Number of ULFTs (or incentives) distributed 50 /yr 50 /yr 6. Total ULFT replacement cost $ 5,000 /yr $ 5,000 /yr (Line 4 x Line 5) Incentive Processing Costs 7. Average rebate processing cost (if not included in $ 10 /ULFT 8. Total rebate processing cost $ 1,000 /yr (Line 5 x Line 7) Publicity Costs 9. Marketing collateral cost $ 1,000 /yr (e.g., brochure design, printing, web services) 10. Advertising cost $ 4,000 /yr (i.e. newspaper, radio, TV, web) 11. Total publicity costs $ 5,000 /yr (Line 9 + Line 10) Evaluation and Followup Costs 12. Labor & Consultant costs $ 5,000 /yr 13. Total Costs $ 36,000 /yr (Line 3 + Line 6 + Line 8 + Line 11 + Line 12) Program Cost Sharing 14. Cost Share from Others $ - /yr (e.g., other agencies, grants, in-kind contrib.) 15. Net Agency Cost $ 36,000 /yr (Line 13 - Line 14) DMM 14 ULFT Replacement Programs Step 2 - Customer Water Savings Single -Family Multi -Family 1. Avg. Persons Per Household' 2.5 2.5 O Use CUWCC Reliable Savings Estima 2. Avg. Savings per ULFT' 36.5 gpd 49.0 gpd O Use Own Estimate (gallons per day per ULFT) 3. Toilet Natural Replacement Rate' 4.0 %/yr 4.0 %/yr 4. Number of ULFTs Distributed 50 50 (from STEP 1 Line 5) 5. Percent Free -riders 35 % 35 % 6. 25 -Year Savings 21.2 AF 28.5 AF Notes: 1) Per 2005 UWMP DMM 14 ULFT Replacement Programs Step 3 - Agency Benefits Avoided Supply Acquisition Costs (include future avoided capital costs as appropriate) 1. Marginal Source of Suppy' (List name) 2. Avoidable Supply Acquisition Cost2 Avoided Treatment & Distribution Capacity Costs None $ 0 /AF 3. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 $ 0 /AF (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) Avoided Wastewater Capacity Costs (if service provided by agency) 4. Avoided capacity expansion costs2 $ 0 /AF (dollars per AF of water saved by conservation) Avoided Treatment & Distribution Variable Costs (include wastewater services if provided by agency) Avoided chemical costs Annual energy costs2 $ 5. Total annual chemical costs2 $ 42,000.00 /yr 6. Annual fixed costs for chemicals $ /yr 7. Annual chemical costs not related to water production $ /yr 8. Avoidable chemical costs $ 42,000.00 /yr (Line 5 - Line 6 - Line 7) 14. Avoidable energy costs 9. Average annual treated water use /yr 2,952 AF 10. Unit Cost of Chemicals $ 14.23 /AF 15. (Line 8 _ Line 9) 2,952.00 Avoided energy costs 11. Annual energy costs2 $ 350,000.00 /yr 12. Annual fixed costs $ /yr 13. Annual energy costs not related to water production $ /yr (e.g., lighting, heating/cooling) 14. Avoidable energy costs $ 350,000.00 /yr (Line 11 - Line 12 - Line 13) 15. Average annual water use 2,952.00 AF (from Line 9 above) 16. Unit Cost of Energy $ 118.56 /AF (Line 14 _ Line 15) 17. Avoided Treatment & Distribution Variab $ 132.79 /AF (Line 10 + Line 16) 18. Total Supply & Wastewater Benefits $ 132.79 /AF (Line 2 + Line 3 + Line 4 + Line 17) Environmental Benefits Source: 2005 UWMP 19. Environmental benefit per AF saved $ 50 /AF (e.g. value of instream flow, improved water quality, avoided environmental mitigation for supply development or wastewater disposal) Notes: 1) No new supply sources needed 2) As described in "Assumptions for all DMMs" DMM 14 ULFT Replacement Programs Step 4 - Other Benefits & Costs OTHER BENEFITS Avoided Wastewater Utility Costs (IMPORTANT: do not include those listed in STEP 3 Agency Benefits) 1. Avoided energy & chemical costs $ 0 /AF of conserved water 2. Avoided wastewater capacity expansion 3. Total avoided wastewater utility costs (Line 6 + Line 7) OTHER COSTS Customer Participation Costs 4. Average customer expenditures per ULFT (e.g., installation, disposal of old toilet) 5. Number of ULFTs distributed (from Line 5 of STEP 1) 6. Percent of Freeriders (from Line 5 of STEP 2) 7. Total customer costs (Line 4 x Line 5 x (1 - Line 6)) $ 0 /AF of conserved water $ - /AF of conserved water Single Family Multi Family ULFTs ULFTs $ 125 /ULFT $ 125 /ULFT 50 50 35 % 35 % $ 4,062.50 $ 4,062.50 DMM 14 ULFT Replacement Programs Step 5 - Other Benefits & Costs Discount Rates (required) 1. Agency Discount Rate 2.5 % 2. Social Discount Rate 2.0 % Annual Escalation Rates (optional) 3. Avoided cost of water and wastewater - %/yr 4. Environmental benefits - %/yr 5. Energy cost - %/yr DMM 14 ULFT Replacement Programs JLUL) 0 - MUVIUW MUbU Lb Present Value Benefits 7. Agency supply & wastewater benefit: 8. Environmental benefits 9. Other utility benefits 10. Total benefits $7,051 $5,122 $1,929 NA 11. Net Present Value (Line 10 - Line 6) 12. Benefit -Cost Ratio (Line 10 _ Line 6) 13. Simple Unit Supply Cost (Line 6 _ Line 2) ($28,949) [IMM $723 /AF $5,375 $2,024 $0 $7,398 111aVA $887 /AF 14. Discounted Unit Supply Cost $933 /AF $1,090 /AF (Line 6 _ discounted water savings) This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Agency Perspective This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Society Perspective Agency Society ro_gram Present Value Costs Perspective Perspective 1. Total ULFTs distributed 100 100 2. Total water savings 49.8 AF 49.8 AF 3. Agency program costs $36,000 $36,000 4. Customer program costs NA $8,125 5. Cost share $0 NA 6. Net Program Cost $36,000 $44,125 Present Value Benefits 7. Agency supply & wastewater benefit: 8. Environmental benefits 9. Other utility benefits 10. Total benefits $7,051 $5,122 $1,929 NA 11. Net Present Value (Line 10 - Line 6) 12. Benefit -Cost Ratio (Line 10 _ Line 6) 13. Simple Unit Supply Cost (Line 6 _ Line 2) ($28,949) [IMM $723 /AF $5,375 $2,024 $0 $7,398 111aVA $887 /AF 14. Discounted Unit Supply Cost $933 /AF $1,090 /AF (Line 6 _ discounted water savings) This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Agency Perspective This BMP is not cost-effective to implement from the Society Perspective RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH ADOPTING UPDATED URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, 1. The City last updated its Urban Water Management Plan ("UWMP") on October 17,2007 -and 2. Water Code Section 10621 the City is required to update its plan every five years in years ending in 0 and 5; and 3. The City has circulated the draft among diverse agencies, persons and organizations within and without the City of Ukiah; and 4. The City has considered and responded to all comments received on the draft plan; and 5. The City published in a newspaper of general circulation notice of the hearing and mailed notice of the hearing to Mendocino County all as required by law; and 6. The City Council conducted a hearing on the proposed UWMP update and considered the proposed plan and all comments received prior to and at the hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. the City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby adopts the updated Urban Water Management Plan as proposed and revised prior to the adoption of this resolution, which final document is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and 2. The City Clerk is directed to submit to the Department of Water Resources, the California State Library, and Mendocino County a copy of the UWMP attached hereto as Exhibit A within 30 days of the adoption of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 15th June, 2011, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mari Rodin, Mayor ATTEST: JoAnne Currie, City Clerk Idsm ITEM NO.: Pin MEETING DATE. City of `zlkielh AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 12a June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF CITY MANAGER TO SIGN TWO REVISED LETTERS OF INTENT REGARDING COMPREHENSIVE EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION MEASURES PROGRAM WITH HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL RELATED TO FOUR CAPITAL PROJECT COMPONENTS: LETTER #1 INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF WATER METERS, INSTALLATION OF LEAK DETECTION EQUIPMENT; ENERGY SAVING RETROFITS AND REFURBISHMENT TO CONFERENCE CENTER; BIOGAS COGENERATION AT WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. LETTER #2 INCLUDES UKIAH MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, RENOVATION AND DRIVING RANGE CREATION Background: In late summer 2010, the City Manager initiated exploration with Honeywell regarding financing for various capital improvement projects that could have significant impact on the City's financial future and its ability to generate energy and cost savings for its operations. Honeywell, with city staff support, evaluated the feasibility of several proposed projects and presented that information to Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Ad Hoc committee members Crane and Landis, on December 1, 2010. The Ad Hoc discussed the projects and recommended that the concept and projects be presented to the City Council. At the January 5, 2011, the City Council received a staff report outlining the proposed relationship with Honeywell and the proposed projects, and authorized the City Manager to sign a decision schedule with Honeywell. The time line of the decision schedule has been adhered to by both city staff and Honeywell, so that a preliminary feasibility analysis has been conducted by Honeywell and presented to the City Council members, first at a work shop meeting held April 14, 2011, and then again at a regular City Council meeting held May 4, 2011. At the May 4, 2011 Council meeting, the City Council received as part of the staff report, two draft letters of intent with Honeywell. The first letter covered a scope of services including the replacement of water meters, installation of leak detection equipment; energy saving retrofits and refurbishment to conference Continued on Paae 2 Recommended Action(s): Authorize the City Manager to Sign Letters of Intent # 1 and #2 with Honeywell International Alternative Council Option(s): (A) Authorize the City Manager to Sign Letter of Intent #1 only. (B) Authorize the City Manager to Sign Letter of Intent #2 only. (C) Provide direction to City staff regarding alternative action Citizens advised: Requested by: Prepared by: Jane Chambers, City Manager Coordinated with: Attachments: 1) Letter of Intent #1 2) Letter of Intent #2 Approved: �a�—C:��� a e Chambers, City Manager center; and biogas cogeneration at waste water treatment plant. The second letter included the Ukiah municipal golf course irrigation improvements, renovation, and driving range creation. The staff recommendation, approved by the City Council, was to have the City Attorney and city staff complete review and comment on the draft letters of intent, and to return with final recommended letters of intent on the consent agenda at the May 18, 2011 meeting. Final Letters of Intent were not completed in time for that meeting and have been brought forward for the Council's action on June 1, 2011. At the June 1, 2011 meeting, the City Council directed the City Attorney to revise the LOI agreements further. The City Attorney worked with Honeywell and. attached are LOI agreements acceptable to both the City Attorney and Honeywell for the City Council's consideration. Discussion: The letters of intent have been modified to address the concerns of the City Council with regard to the quality and depth of information to be provided to the Council, prior to consideration of contract documents necessary to implement the project (s). Signed letters of intent will begin the process of developing the detailed analysis and data necessary to determine how or if, a project, and its components, should move forward. The team of persons that Honeywell has proposed for the Ukiah projects also worked with the City of Antioch. The team completed an energy savings project, using the letter of intent as a basis to begin the in depth feasibility study necessary to implement a significant street light replacement project. City staff has confirmed that project was completed by Honeywell and resulted in the promised energy savings projected. The Antioch staff member contacted added that the City of Antioch has had a long and successful relationship with Honeywell on a number of other projects, and the Honeywell team members' performance on those projects has been professional and of high quality. Fiscal Impact: Honeywell uses the letter of intent as a basis on which to go forward and complete the detailed analysis necessary to prepare a project and contract (s) for the City Council's consideration. The letter of intent outlines the conditions Honeywell must meet in order for a contract to come forward. No break fee will be paid to Honeywell if the projects move forward. The City would be required to make payment if Honeywell meets the conditions outlined in the letters of intent, but the City Council chooses not to proceed with the project (s) for reasons other than those covered in the letter of intent. In its May 4, 2011 report, city staff identified that if payment were made to Honeywell for the break fee, funds for that payment would be made from the fund balance in each of the respective enterprise accounts, with the provision that funding from the City, only, portion of the joint sewer fund with UVSD be used. ❑ Budgeted FY 10/11 ❑ New Appropriation a Not Applicable ❑ Budget Amendment Required ATTACHMENT I City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 June 15 , 2011 Robert Falco Energy Services Account Executive Honeywell International Inc. 353 A Vintage Park Drive Foster City, CA 94545 Re: Letter of Intent Regarding Comprehensive Efficiency and Conservation Measures Program Dear Robert, This letter is to confirm that the City of Ukiah ("City") intends to proceed with Honeywell, Inc. toward finalizing a contract for energy efficiency, water conservation, operational and facility improvements of City - owned facilities and equipment. The purpose of the contract is for Honeywell to offer a turn -key program for design, implementation and financing, utilizing 3rd party financing vehicles such as a tax-exempt municipal lease instrument, for capital improvements resulting in improved efficiency, revenue generation from City owned assets, conservation savings, and operational improvements for the City. This Letter of Intent shall be effective for 180 days or until superseded by an executed contract between the parties. During the time this Letter of Intent remains in effect, the City of Ukiah shall not negotiate with any party other than Honeywell concerning the comprehensive efficiency and conservation measures described in this letter. Additionally, Honeywell will undertake certain activities including, but not limited to, an investment grade assessment and Contract documents creation for the following Scope of Services: 1. Comprehensive replacement of water meters with Advanced Meter Reading technology and leak detection equipment 2. Comprehensive Conference Center Equipment and Furnishings Refurbishment and Design including implementation of energy saving retrofits to include HVAC, Controls, Lighting, and Life Safety. 3. Biogas Cogeneration system for Ukiah Waste Water Treatment Plant. "Investment grade assessment," as used herein means the work outlined in the attached Program Development Schedule and any additional work performed by Honeywell to develop a contract proposal to the City. The City of Ukiah intends to enter into a contract with Honeywell International Inc., provided that (1) the City Council determines that the projects and proposed financing are acceptable to the community; (2) can be approved in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act; (3) prior to entering negotiations with the City for a contract to perform a project, Honeywell provides the City in writing all of the information and data developed or considered by Honeywell in determining whether the project is feasible and meets the intent of this letter of intent, including reasonable detail (30% design) for all components of the contract, and program cash flows and the opportunity cost of maintaining the status quo; and (4) Honeywell develops a contract that meets all of the following criteria: • The proposed project savings and/or additional revenue projections allow the project to be paid for in not more than 13 -years out of savings in energy, operational costs and new revenue generation. Page 1 of 2 • The proposed project costs do not increase the total energy and operational expenditures for the facilities above the level spent in 2010 beyond the adjustment for CPI. • Honeywell financially guarantees the proposed annual energy savings under terms mutually negotiated with the City. The City of Ukiah uses the savings to pay the debt instrument. • Honeywell arranges financing for the Projects on terms mutually negotiated with the City. • The proposed project Contract Documents will address the overall intent of this Letter of Intent which is a project consisting of capital improvements paid for through energy savings, operational savings and/or additional revenue generation forecasts. The mutually negotiated contract will provide a detailed scope of work and document energy savings guarantees. • Other mutually agreed contract terms, provided that both Honeywell and the City negotiate in good faith. The project's final scope of work, to include all asset improvement measures, will be co-authored and agreed to by both Honeywell and the City. If Honeywell meets all of the requirements listed above, and the City decides not to enter into a Contract for a final project with Honeywell, then the City shall reimburse Honeywell $85,000. At that time, Honeywell will present an itemized listing of all Assessment Grade Investment Grade Activities associated with the break fee. Sincerely, Jane Chambers City Manager City of Ukiah Page 2 of 2 City of Ukiah Program development Schedule Honeym el Honevy,rell International Task Name April I May June J July J August 1 PEA presentation to board 2 City prepares for Board LOI approval_ 3 Board approves LOI - 4 Roceipt of Signsd LOI 5 Develop detailed schedule for project development 6 Weekly cadence call with City staff 7 ECM 1.0 Water Meter Upgrade 8 Confirm amount, size and location of sample meters fort 9 Develop information notice for sample meter replacemen 10 Meter testing contractor mobilizes to perform work 11 Replace and test sample residential / smaller meters 12 Perform in-situ testing for larger/commercial meters. 13 Analyze & present findings from meter testing`' 14 Capture O&M costs and summarize O&M savings 7� 15 Develop scope of work 16 Procure bids from qualified contractors 17 Project implementation cost calculations 18 ECM 2.0 Conference Center Upgrade 19 Site audit 20 Confirm Tenant Improvements 21 Develop scope of work 22 Procure bids from qualified contractors 23 Project implementation cost calculationsIlk 24 Revenue projection 25 Controls Upgrade 26 Scope development ! 27 Procure bids from qualified contractors 28 Savings calculations 29 Mechanical & Kitchen Upgrade 30 Scope development 31 Procure bids from qualified contractors 32 Revenue projection for commercial kitchen upgrade 33 Project implementation cost calculations 34 ECM 3.0 WWTP Renewable Energy Project 35 Site audit 36 Utility bill and gas production analysis 37 Data collection and trending �y 38 Scope development 39 Savings calculations ----- 40 Procure bids from qualified contractors EM 41 Project implementation cost calculations 42 ECM 4.0 Upgrade Golf Course �I 43 Irrigation System Task pil ""!' " Milestone Critical Task Summary Progress Print Date = v16fZU11 Page 1 of Print Date = ,,i6fZU11 Page 3 4t 4 City of Ukiah Program development Schedule Honey- �, Hone,ryrell International Task Name April May June I July August __..._J 44 --- — --- Site visit: Irrigation system L 45 Inventory of sprinkler heads, control system & equipme i 46 Analysis of system operation 47 Bill analysis 48 Savings and project implementation cost calculations E 49 Flip -Flop Renovation 50 Site visit: Flip-flop renovation 51 Evaluate condition, viability of proposed driving range 52 Evaluate condition, viability of proposed new golf holes 53 Develop concept plan and scope of work 54 Procure bids from qualified contractors 55 Project implementation cost calculations i 56 Revenue projection 57 3rd Party Financing 58 Preparation and issuance of financing RFP 59 Evaluate proposals, prepare for meeting w/ City officials 60 Negotiate w/finance company for rate & closing costs 61 Contracting Items 62 Exchange of Terms and Conditions 63 Scope, savings/revenue and financing workshop with Cit 64 Measurement & Verification - City selects preferred appr 65 3rd party financing agreement finalized 66 Honeywell organizes final contract for City Council revie 67 Submit documents to City in preparation for Council Appr 68 City Council staff reviews docs, prepares for City Council 69 City ("Ouncil meeting Approval Print Date = ,,i6fZU11 Page 3 4t 4 Task l ei, Milestone Critical TaskSummary Progress Nrint Late = tit-12UI I Page 4' of ATTACHMENT City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 June 15, 2011 Robert Falco Energy Services Account Executive Honeywell International Inc. 353 A Vintage Park Drive Foster City, CA 94545 Re: Letter of Intent Regarding Comprehensive Efficiency and Conservation Measures Program Dear Robert, This letter is to confirm that the City of Ukiah ("City") intends to proceed with Honeywell, Inc. toward finalizing a contract for energy efficiency, water conservation, operational and facility improvements of City -owned facilities and equipment. The purpose of the contract is for Honeywell to offer a turn -key program for design, implementation and financing, utilizing 3rd party financing vehicles such as a tax- exempt,municipal lease instrument, for capital improvements resulting in improved efficiency, revenue generation from City owned assets, conservation savings, and operational improvements for the City. This Letter of Intent shall be effective for 180 days or until superseded by an executed contract between the parties. During the time this Letter of Intent remains in effect, the City of Ukiah shall not negotiate with any party other than Honeywell concerning the comprehensive efficiency and conservation measures described in this letter. Additionally, Honeywell will undertake certain activities including, but not limited to, an investment grade assessment and Contract documents creation for the following Scope of Services: 1. Design and implementation of Ukiah Municipal Golf Course irrigation improvements, "Flip-flop" renovation and Driving Range creation. The Investment Grade Assessment of the Ukiah Municipal Golf Course improvements is contingent upon the acquisition of a parcel of land adjacent to the golf course currently owned by the Ukiah Unified School District. Honeywell will proceed with Investment Grade Assessment activities as soon as the referenced parcel of land for this item is in escrow. Should negotiations with the District continue for a period of 180 days beyond the effective date of this Letter of Intent, the City will work with Honeywell to either extend the term of the Letter of Intent or abandon the golf course improvement program. Unless the City is successful in obtaining the property in question, the City will have no financial obligation to Honeywell for this item. "Investment grade assessment," as used herein means the work outlined in the attached Program Development Schedule and any additional work performed by Honeywell to develop a contract proposal to the City. The City of Ukiah intends to enter into a contract with Honeywell International Inc. provideed that (1) the City Council determines that the projects and proposed financing are acceptable to the community; (2) can be approved in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act; and (3) prior to entering negotiations with the City for a contract to perform a project, Honeywell provides the City in writing all of the information and data developed or considered by Honeywell in determining whether the project is feasible and meets the intent of this letter of intent, including reasonable detail (30%design) for all components of the contract, and program cash flows and the opportunity cost of maintaining the status quo; and (4) Honeywell develops a contract that meets the following criteria: City of Ukiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 • The proposed project savings and/or additional revenue projections allow the project to be paid for in not more than 13 -years out of savings in energy, operational costs and new revenue generation. • The proposed project costs do not increase the total energy and operational expenditures for the facilities above the level spent in 2010 beyond the adjustment for CPI. • Honeywell financially guarantees the proposed annual energy savings under terms mutually negotiated with the City. The City of Ukiah uses the savings to pay the debt instrument. • Honeywell arranges financing for the Projects on terms mutually negotiated with the City. • The proposed project Contract Documents will address the overall intent of this Letter of Intent which is a project consisting of capital improvements paid for through energy savings, operational savings and/or additional revenue generation forecasts. The mutually negotiated contract will provide a detailed scope of work and document energy savings guarantees. • Other mutually agreed contract terms, provided that both Honeywell and the City negotiate in good faith. The project's final scope of work, to include all asset improvement measures, will be co-authored and agreed to by both Honeywell and the City. If Honeywell meets all of the requirements listed above, and the City decides not to enter into a Contract for a final project with Honeywell, then the City shall reimburse Honeywell $25,000. At that time, Honeywell will present an itemized listing of all Assessment Grade Investment Grade Activities associated with the break fee. Sincerely, Jane Chambers City Manager City of Ukiah City of Ukiah Program Development Schedule Task Name April 1 PEA presentation to board 2 City prepares for Board LOI approval 3 Board approves LOI —_ 1 4 Receipt of Signed LOI 5 Develop detailed schedule for project development J 6 Weekly cadence call with City staff 7 1 ECM 1.0 Water Meter Upgrade 8 Confirm amount, size and location of sample meters for t 9 Develop information notice for sample meter replacemen I 10; Meter testing contractor mobilizes to perform work 11, Replace and test sample residential / smaller meters 12 Perform in-situ testing for larger/commercial meters — 13 Analyze & present findings from meter testing 14Capture O&M costs and summarize O&M savings ! 15 Develop scope of work i 16 Procure bids from qualified contractors 17 Project implementation cost calculations _ 18i ECM 2.0 Conference Center Upgrade 19' Site audit I 201. Confirm Tenant Improvements 21 Develop scope of work j 22 Procure bids from qualified contractors j 23' Project implementation cost calculations 24. Revenue projection 25' Controls Upgrade 26; Scope development 27 Procure bids from qualified contractors 28; Savings calculations 29, Mechanical & Kitchen Upgrade— - 30 Scope development 31 Procure bids from qualified contractors - 32' Revenue projection for commercial kitchen upgrade 33 Project implementation cost calculations 34 ECM 3.0 WWTP Renewable Energy Project 35' Site audit 36 Utility bill and gas production analysis 37 Data collection and trending 38i Scope development 39 Savings calculations 40' Procure bids from qualified contractors 41; Project implementation cost calculations 42: ECM 4.0 Upgrade Golf Course j 43;_--- Irrigation System _------------- --� Task Progress 141 Milestone June I July k A Print Date = tiWZU11 — Page 1 of City of Ukiah Program Development Schedule Task Name Site visit: Irrigation system Inventory of sprinkler heads, control system & equipme Analysis of system operation Bill analysis Savings and project implementation cost calculations Flip -Flop Renovation Site visit: Flip-flop renovation Evaluate condition, viability of proposed driving range Evaluate condition, viability of proposed new golf holes Develop concept plan and scope of work Procure bids from qualified contractors Project implementation cost calculations Revenue projection 3rd Party Financing Preparation and issuance of financing RFP Evaluate proposals, prepare for meeting w/ City officials Negotiate w/finance company for rate & closing costs Contracting Items Exchange of Terms and Conditions Scope, savings/revenue and financing workshop with Cit Measurement & Verification - City selects preferred appr 3rd party financing agreement finalized Honeywell organizes final contract for City Council revie Submit documents to City in preparation for Council Appr City Council staff reviews docs, prepares for City Council City Council meeting Approval Task Critical Task Progress Milestone Summary June I July August Print Date = 516rZU1 I Paae 3 of 2010 Urban Wat3 Management Plan ..'_ne 2011 Public Hearing June 15, 2011 Engineers... Working Wonders With Water Introductions • City Staff — Tim Eriksen: Public Works Director — Jarod Thiele: Public Works Administration — Paul Smith: Water Treatment Plant Supervisor • Carollo Engineers — Paul Friedlander: Project Director — Tommy Greci: Project Manager • Wagner & Bonsignore — Robert Wagner — Emily MacDonald y 2 Agenda x a Q • UWMP Background • Supplies • Historic and Projected Demands (SBx7-7) • Conservation • Conclusions • Adoption Schedule a UWMP Background • Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) — In 1983, State Assembly Bill 797 modified the California Water Code Division 6, by creating the UWMPA. Several amendments to the original UWMPA have increased data requirements and planning elements to be included in the 2005 and 2010 plans. 4 UWMP Background • 2010 Urban Water Management Plan — Required by California Water Code — Must be updated every 5 years — Must Satisfy the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act and recent amendments. Water Conservation Bill of 2009 (SBx7-7) — Applies to utilities that supply 3,000 acre-feet or 3,000 connections Purpose • Update DWR on local existing and planned water supplies (quantity and quality impacts) • Maintain efficient use of urban water supplies • Continue to promote conservation programs and policies • Ensure that sufficient water supplies are available for future beneficial use • Provide a mechanism for response during water drought conditions 9 [. Components of the 2010 UWMP • Plan Preparation • System Description • System Demands • System Supplies • Water Supply Reliability and Water Shortage Contingency Planning • Demand Management Measures Agenda 0 • Supplies • Historic and Projected Demands (SBx7-7) • Conservation • Conclusions • Adoption Schedule Existing Supply Facilities • Supply Facilities — Five active wells — One Ranney collector ® Supply Capacity — 6,386 gpm — 9.2 mgd Production Current Capacity Facility Type of Supply Status GPM Ranney Surface water Active 3,194 Collector(2) Well #3 Groundwater influenced Active 600 by surface water Well #4 Groundwater Active 799 Well #5 Groundwater influenced Active 300 by surface water Well #7 Groundwater Active 799 Well #8 Groundwater Active 694 Total Active Well Capacity (GPM) 6,386 Total Active Well Capacity (AFY) 10,308 Notes: 1. Source: City staff records. 2. The Ranney Collector can only be used during the dry season when surface water turbidity is low. Surface Water Sources West Fork Uc Russian River T T Diversions • • rG�f "CIO �e`O�, FI Ukiah • V�a� aeeJ • Cloverdale 1 Legend USGS Gaging Station :e! Q�us ods Lake tR`Q Mendocino TTibuta�Y Groundwater Exchange Groundwater Exchange Mendocino Co. Sonoma Co. Rainfall dij Groundwater Basin Projected Supply Sources N Potter Valley Project s� ...... East. West Fork" Fork ,1. . ..r. =: : • :::::::::::::::... . Ukiah r.. #�:.. ►: Valley :::: -:::::: T 9..1•.........I .............. Q 100 sq. mi. 103 sq. �. +!; -;{ 137 sq. mi ............................. ........... i xisShowing Arm A City ofukimb Mmdocmo Couty, CdWm is Agenda 0 0 • Historic &Projected Demands (SBx7-7) • Conservation • Conclusions • Adoption Schedule ........... A 13 Population Projections 21,000 20,000 19,000 18,000 ca c 17,000 a 16,000 15,000 14,000 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year ! Historical Population i —t—Projected Population wo Historical Population and Water Demands 1,500 1,000 0 a 750 c 500 m 0 L 250 X, 2005 Year 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10, 000 ca 8,000 0 CL 6,000 4,000 I 2,000 — 0 2010 Per -Capita Demands 260 240 220 200 180 160 N 140 120 L 100 80 60 40 20 0 1995 x a m 2000 Year 2005 2010 16 2020 Water Conservation Targets ® Four Methods Established by DWR — Method 1 — Baseline Reduction Method — Method 2 — Efficiency Standard Method — Method 3 — Hydrologic Region Method — Method 4 — BMP Based Method Guidebook to Assist Urban Water Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan x a Method 1 - Baseline Reduction Method • 20% Reduction in Baseline Water Use 260 250 �-- 240 1 230 Q. 220 210 I L 200 190 '— i 180 i 170 160 4- 1995 --I*— Daily Per Capita Water Use — Selected 10 -Yr Baseline Water Use 2000 2005 2010 Year — 10 -Year Baseline = 232 gpcd — 2020 Water Use Target = 185 gpcd 18 Preliminary Water Use Target Method 1 208 185 20% -10% Method 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a Method 3 181 130 44% 23% Method 4 206 180 22% Notes: 1) Baseline use is 232 gpcd 2) 2010 use is 168 gpcd - - -- ----------- --I 250 - --- - - 10 -Year Baseline Water Use= 232 gpcd 240 - - -- 230 i — — --- — — -- 2015 Interim Target = 208 gpcd -_ 1 : 220 v 1 210 1 N 200 1 190 d ---------------- 180 Q 170 2020 Water Use Target= 185 gpcd 160 - 150---- 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year a —Fl— Annual Water Use n --- Selected 10 -Yr Baseline Water Use Projected Water Use 19 ,- Agenda VIMP Backgro.une • �K E] • Conservation • Conclusions • Adoption Schedule Conservation 5.0 4.5 __ Baseline Water Use = 232 gpcd 4.0 - --- - 3.5 3.0 - as u) 2.5 m 2.0 - 2015 Water Use = 208 gpcd 3: 1.5 2020 Water Use = 185 gpcd - 1.0 0.5 0.0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year Historic Water Use —+--Target Projected Water Demand �-Baseline Projected Water Demand 21 Conservation= Demand Management Measures 22 Cost Effective Planned for Analysis Not Demand Management Measure Implemented Implementation j Completed Applicable DMM 1 - Water Survey Programs ✓ DMM 2 - Residential Plumbing ✓ Retrofit DMM 3 - Water System Audits ✓ DMM 4 - Metering with Commodity Rates ✓ DMM 5 - Landscape Irrigation Programs ✓ ✓ DMM 6 - Washing Machine Rebate Program DMM 7 - Public Information Pim ✓ 22 Conservation= Demand Management Measures Cost Effective Planned for Analysis Not Demand Management Measure Implemented Implementation Completed Applicable DIVIM 8 - School Education Program IV DIVIM 9 - Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional ✓ Conservation Programs DIVI M 10 - Wholesale Agency Programs DIVIM 11 - Conservation Pricing ✓ DIVIM 12 - Water Conservation ✓ Coordinator DIVIM 13 - Water Waste ✓ Prohibition DIVIM 14 - Ultra Low Flush ✓ Toilet Replacement 23 Agenda . . . • Conclusions • Adoption Schedule Conclusions ® Demand Projections — Year 2010: 4,068 afy (baseline, not actual) — Year 2035: 4,173 afy (with SBx7-7 targets) • Water Conservation — Method 1 selected — Baseline 232 gpcd — Year 2020 Target 185 gpcd — Year 2010 was 168 gpcd (below 2020 target) Q Q wow r 25 u Agenda r Hi o is an rQ J- ' e rid E E7 • Adoption Schedule Preparation of UWMP Public Review Process Workshop & Counci y Meeting PRD 6/30 Draft � Guidebook Release 3/8 Final to DWR 60 -Day Notification Public Review 6/86/15 Public Workshop Public Hearing 4 .. &Adoption 7/15 DWR's Submittal Deadline �r �- 27 2010 UWMP • Ukiah Civic Center • www.cityofukiah.com 28 .................. 2010 Urban Wath" Management Plan June 201 1 Public Hearing June 15t", 2011 IF Caron/ Engineers... Working Wonders With WaterO ITEM NUMBER: 13a DATE: June 15, 2011 AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES FOR TERM EXPIRATIONS AND VACANCIES RELATIVE TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSION; BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS; PARKS, RECREATION, AND GOLF COMMISSION; AND PATHS, OPEN SPACE AND CREEKS COMMISSION; AND RESOLUTION MAKING THE APPOINTMENTS. Background: Vacancy Announcements soliciting applicants to fill expiring and unexpired terms of the Airport Commission (3), Building Board of Appeals (2), Parks, Recreation & Golf Commission (3), and Paths, Open Space & Creeks Commission (2) were posted at various locations and the City's website. News Releases were issued on December 2010, and May 3, 2011. Resolution 2001-61 which sets forth the procedure for filling vacancies on City Commissions and Boards is attached. City Council may choose not to interview incumbents. The right to nominate a candidate from the available pool shall rotate among the Councilmembers based on seniority. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 11/12 1-1NewAppropriation � Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addit. Appropriation Requested Continued on Page 2 Recommended Action(s): 1) Interview three (3) Parks, Recreation, and Golf Commission applicant and one (1) Airport Commission. 2) Make nominations. 3) Adopt a Resolution making appointment to the above Commissions and Committees. Alternative Council Policy Option(s): Direct staff to re -advertise the vacancies and/or reschedule appointments accordingly. Citizens advised: Incumbents and applicants Requested by: Prepared by: JoAnne M. Currie, City Clerk Coordinated with: Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 2001-61 which Established Procedures for Appointment 2. Information on the commissions that received an application 3. Vacancies Announcement 4. Applications and Requests for Reappointment 5. Resolution making appointments Approved:_�--- ne Chambers, City Manager Annual Appointments Page 2 of 2 Discussion: Airport Commission: Three (3) seats are available, two (2) requiring residency within the City Limits and one (1) requiring residency within Mendocino County. One (1) seat has been vacant and expires 2013. There are two (2) incumbents Jeffrey Sloan and Carl Steinmann. Dottie Deerwester is no longer on active duty and has reapplied. One Mendocino county resident application was received. The applicant withdrew the application because the incumbents have reapplied and was only interested if a lack of interest existed. Mr. Sloan and Mr. Steinmann (who moved out of the city limits) are both Mendocino County residents. However, only one county resident seat is available. The last nomination of Eric Crane was made 6/16/2010 by Councilmember Thomas, placing Councilmember Landis as next having the right to place a nomination before the City Council. Consideration of Appointments: Reappoint incumbents, one residing within the City Limits of Ukiah (Ms. Deerwester) to an unexpired term or new three-year term and one residing within Mendocino County (either Mr. Sloan or Mr. Steinmann) to a three-year term. An insufficient number of applications were received to fill all vacancies; with Council's concurrence, staff plans to extend the application deadline and re -advertise the vacancy. Building Code Board of Appeals: Two (2) seats are available; one member and one alternate member., Incumbent Jim Apperson has reapplied and there are no new applicants. The last nomination of Jim Apperson was made 9/1/2010 by Councilmember Landis, placing Councilmember Baldwin as next having the right to place a nomination before the City Council Consideration of Appointments: Reappoint incumbent to a new three-year term. An insufficient number of applications were received to fill all vacancies; with Council's concurrence, staff plans to extend the application deadline and re -advertise the vacancy. Parks, Recreation, and Golf Commission: Three (3) seats are available, one (1) of the seats is to fill women's golf club position, one of the three seats must be a City of Ukiah resident. No incumbents have reapplied. Three applications have been received meeting the residency requirement from Faye Hefte, Henry T. Sadowski, and Kathleen Theresa Selzer. Councilmember Crane nominated Don Rones Sr. at the 6/16/2010 meeting, placing Councilmember Thomas as next having the right to place a nomination before the City Council. Consideration of Appointments: Interview and appoint one applicant (Ms. Selzer or Ms. Hefte) to the women's golf club seat and appoint two to at large seats; for a three-year term. Paths, Open Space and Creeks Commission: Two (2) seats are available. Incumbents James Connerton and Robert Neale III have reapplied and there are no new applicants. Councilmember Baldwin nominated Suzanne Farris at the 12/2/2009 meeting, placing Councilmember Rodin as next having the right to place a nomination before the City Council. Consideration of Appointments: Reappoint incumbents to a three-year term. ATTACHMENT __Lv____ RESOLUTION NO. 2001-61 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AMENDING PROCEDURE FOR FILLING VACANCIES ON CITY COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS. WHEREAS, 1. Ukiah City Code §1151 provides that members of the Planning Commission shall be appointed in accordance with a procedure established by resolution of the City Council; and 2. The City Council adopted a procedure for filling vacancies on the City's boards and commissions, including the Planning Commission; and 3. The City Council has determined that using a uniform procedure will insure fair and consistent treatment of candidates and Councilmembers; 4. The City Council has determined to amend its procedures for appointing commissioners; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following amended procedure for filling vacancies on the City's commissions and boards, including the Planning Commission. PROCEDURE FOR FILLING VACANCIES ON COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS The City Council shall fill vacancies on City boards and commissions, using the following procedure. 1. Applicant pool. The City Council shall develop an available pool of candidates for a vacancy by advertising the vacancy at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in Ukiah not less than thirty (30) days prior to the council meeting at which the vacancy is to be filled. The advertisement shall specify a deadline for submitting applications. All completed applications received prior to the deadline shall be included in the pool of available applicants, provided the applicant; a. meets the minimum qualifications for the position as established in the applicable Ukiah City Code section or resolution, establishing the commission or board; and b. participates in a personal interview, if the City Council conducts personal interviews for the position. The City Council has determined that interviews will be conducted for applicants of the Planning Commission, the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission, and the Airport Commission. An application shall be deemed complete when signed by the applicant. Applications included in an available pool may be used as a source of nominations for a period of one (1) year from the application deadline. 2. Exceptions. The following shall be considered for appointment or reappointment to a commission or board without submitting a written application: a. Incumbents seeking reappointment for an additional term; b. Elected officials seeking appointment in their capacity as elected officials; c. City staff seeking appointment in their capacity as City staff; d. All appointees, except public members, on the Investment Oversight Commission, Traffic Engineering Committee, Cultural Arts Advisory Board and the Disaster Board; e. City Council members, including the Mayor, appointed in their capacity as City Council members; and f. Appointments to the Civil Service Board. Any such exempt applicants shall be considered for appointment, if they submit a written request for consideration within 10 days of the date the appointment is made. 3. Nominations. Each Councilmember, including the Mayor, shall have the right to nominate a candidate from the available pool of candidates. a. The right to place a name before the City Council for consideration shall rotate among the Councilmembers based on seniority with the most senior Councilmember going first. b. The Council shall vote on each nomination as it is made. c. A Councilmember's right to make a nomination shall terminate and the right to nominate candidates shall rotate to the next most senior Councilmember, when a Councilmember's nomination is approved by a majority vote of the Councilmembers present or the Councilmember agrees to pass the nomination to the next most senior Councilmember, whichever occurs first. d. This process for rotating the right to nominate candidates among Councilmembers to fill vacancies shall be followed for each separate commission or board. 1. The City Clerk shall maintain a record of the last Councilmember to make a nomination for each commission or board. 2. When another vacancy must be filled on that commission or board, the next Councilmember in line to make nominations for that commission or board shall make the first nomination to fill the vacancy. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of dune, 2001, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Larson, Smith, Baldwin, and Mayor Ashiku NOES: Councilmember Libby ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None —�14 W/ / Philip Ashiku, Mayor ATTEST: - , "kz I -;, e�' ?t /Z' � -, I e i, � r�' Marie Ulvila, City Clerk CHAPTER 4 M7ACHi ENT 2 COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS ARTICLE 1. PARKS, RECREATION, AND GOLF COMMISSION 1000: CREATION: There is hereby created a parks, recreation, and golf commission. This advisory body shall report to the city council. (Ord. 783, §1, adopted 1982; Ord. 916, §2, adopted 1990; Ord. 1020, adopted 1999) 1001: MEMBERSHIP; APPOINTMENT: The commission shall consist of seven (7) members as follows: A. One member of the Ukiah men's golf club. B. One member of the Ukiah women's golf club. C. One member of either the men's or women's golf club. D. Four (4) at large members who may reside within the city limits or outside the city limits but within Mendocino County; provided that a majority of the seven (7) committee members must reside within the city limits. All members of the commission shall be appointed by the city council. (Ord. 783, §1, adopted 1982; Ord. 890, adopted 1989; Ord. 916, §2, adopted 1990; Ord. 935, §2, adopted 1993; Ord. 1020, adopted 1999; Ord. 1100, §1, adopted 2007) 1002: TERM OF OFFICE; VACANCIES: No members of the parks, recreation, and golf commission will lose their term of office by enactment of this ordinance. All appointments to this commission shall be for a term of three (3) years. Reappointments to the commission shall be pursuant to article 5 of this chapter. (Ord. 783, §1, adopted 1982; Ord. 916, §2, adopted 1990; Ord. 1020, adopted 1999) 1003: DUTIES AND POWERS: The parks, recreation, and golf commission shall have the power and duty to recommend and advise on: A. Policies to be adopted and enforced for the operation, use and management of all recreation activities and facilities, parks and parkways. B. Policies for the planning of recreation and parks programs for the inhabitants of the city, promote and stimulate public interest therein, and to that end, solicit to the fullest extent possible the cooperation of school authorities and other public or private agencies interested therein. C. Policies for the acquisition, development and improvement of parks, playgrounds and facilities for recreation. (Ord. 783, §1, adopted 1982; Ord. 916, §2, adopted 1990; Ord. 1020, adopted 1999) 1004: COMPENSATION: The members of the commission shall receive no compensation, except such traveling expenses as are authorized by law. (Ord. 783, §1, adopted 1982; Ord. 916, §2, adopted 1990) 1005: CHAIRPERSON; OFFICERS: The commission shall elect a chairperson from among its members for a term of one year and may elect such other officers as it may determine. (Ord. 783, §1, adopted 1982; Ord. 916, §2, adopted 1990) ARTICLE 3. AIRPORT COMMISSION 1100: CREATION: There is hereby created an airport commission for the city. (Ord. 512, §1, adopted 1956) 1101: MEMBERS; APPOINTMENT; TERM OF OFFICE: Said commission shall consist of five (5) members. Except as provided herein, three (3) of the members shall be residents of the city and two (2) may reside outside the city limits but within Mendocino County. Members shall be appointed according to procedures established by resolution of the city council. The members shall be appointed for a term of three (3) years which terms shall be staggered. (Ord. 512, §1, adopted 1956; Ord. 633, §1, adopted 1973; Ord. 718, §4, adopted 1978; Ord. 935, §2, adopted 1993; Ord. 972, §1, adopted 1996; Ord. 983, §1, adopted 1996; Ord. 1100, §1, adopted 2007) 1102: COMPENSATION: The members of the commission shall receive no compensation, except such expenses as are authorized by law. (Ord. 512, §1, adopted 1956) 1103: CHAIRMAN; OFFICERS: The commission shall elect a chairman from among the appointed members for a term of one year and, subject to other provisions of law, may elect such other officers as it may determine. (Ord. 512, §2, adopted 1956) 1104: MEETINGS; RULES; RECORD: The commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each month. It shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of its transactions, findings and recommendations, which record shall be a public record. (Ord. 512, §2, adopted 1956) 1105: COMMISSION TO ACT IN ADVISORY CAPACITY: Such commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the city council in all matters pertaining to the operations of the municipal airport. (Ord. 512, §3, adopted 1956) 1106: SELECTION OF PERSONNEL: Such commission shall aid and advise the city manager in the selection of personnel for the operation of the municipal airport in keeping with the provisions of the civil service ordinance. (Ord. 512, §4, adopted 1956) 1107: PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES FOR AIRPORT: Such commission shall recommend and advise regarding the purchase of supplies, materials and service required for the operation and maintenance of the municipal airport. (Ord. 512, §5, adopted 1956) ATTACHMENT ,3 OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE YOUR COMMUNITY Date: December 29, 2010 Good Through: June 3, 2011 For Info Call: JoAnne Currie, City Clerk, 463-6217 Subject: Vacancies on City of Ukiah Commissions, Committees, and Boards UKIAH, CA. - The City of Ukiah announces vacancies occurring on the Airport Commission; Board of Appeals, Parks; Recreation, and Golf Commission; Paths, Open Space, and Creeks Commission; and Design Review Board. Any qualified individual, who would like to make a difference in their community and is interested in serving as a volunteer for the terms as outlined below, may apply. Current commissioners and members are eligible for reappointment. Commission/ Number of Incumbent Date of Residency Requirements Committee/Board Vacancies Appointee Appointment and Term Expiration Airport 3 Carl Steinmann 07/08-6/11 Note: 2 of the 3 vacancies Commission Jeffrey Sloan 07/08-6/1 1 must be filled with a Ukiah resident 3 Year Term Vacancy 06/10-6/13 Board of Appeals 1 Jim Apperson 09/10-06/11 1 .) A registered design 3 Year Term professional in good standing with the applicable licensing board with not less than five years of experience as a registered design professional or 2.) Licensed general or specialty contractor in good standing with the Contractors State Licensing Board with not less than five years of experience as a licensed contractor or 3.) A certified building inspector or fire inspector with not less than five years experience as a certified inspector. Members must be residents of or licensed to conduct business in the Ukiah Valley, Redwood Valley or Potter Valley. Parks, Recreation, 3 Julie Dunn 06/08-06/11 Women's Golf Club Member & Golf Bill Hoover 03/09-06/11 Note: 1 of the 3 vacancies Commission 06/10-06/11 must be filled with a Ukiah 3 Year Term Amanda Hair resident Planning 3 Linda Sanders 07/08-12/14 Registered voter of the City of Commission Linda Helland 02/09-12/14 Ukiah. Term coincides with the term of the councilmember who 4 Year Term Jason Brenner 01/11-12/14 nominates the commissioner. Paths, Open 2 James Connerton 8/05-6/11 2 -Resident within Mendocino Space, & Creeks Commission Robert Neale III 6/08-6/11 County Note: None of the 2 vacancies must be filled with a Ukiah 3 Year Term resident 4 Vacant 06/08-06/11 3- must reside or own real Design Review Board Tom Liden 06/08-06/11 property or business within the 3 Year Term Estok Menton 06/08-06/11 City Limits of Ukiah Ukiah Richard Moser 08/05-06/1 1 1- shall represent the community at large with no Redevelopment ownership or residency Agency requirment All must have design experience and community interest Applications and information can be obtained from the city clerk in the Administrative Wing of the Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue, and at the reception counter of the Ukiah Civic Center Annex located at 411 W. Clay Street; on the City's website, www.cityofukiah.com on the City Clerk's or Boards and Commissions' page; or via mail, email, or fax by contacting the City Clerk's office at 707- 463-6217. The submittal deadline is Friday, June 3, 2011 at 5:00 pm. Interviews will be held and appointments considered at a regular City Council meeting scheduled in June 2011. ATTAC H M E e �1T Request for Reappointment RECEIVED CITY OF UKIAH MAY q 2011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT I Request for Reappointment ?C)7) L"�, �'-'Ap c_ 0 F/ -/(:8j — Z ca j— Z�r /����/�f`�/Nd h?C•'VO RECEIVED CITY OF UKIAH MAY =2011 a CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT CITY OF UKiAH AIRPORT COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT A C.anarallnfnrmntinn B. Please answer the following on a separate sheet(s) of paper and attach. 1. Why are you applying to serve on the City of Ukiah's Airport Commission? Previously appointed. Went on active duty with the military and previous appointment expired. Previously served 2 terms. Would like to offer my services again to the Airport Commission and to the community. 2. What is your understanding of the purpose, role, and responsibility of the Airport Commission? Provide recommendations to City Council, provide guidance to staff re: airport -related issues. 3. What do you believe are the three most important Airport: related issues facing our community and why? (1) Use of airport facilities for non -airport related businesses, (2) airport on residential community, (3) positive impact airport has on Ukiah and Mendocino County. 4. In your opinion, what type of Airport programs or Airport development should the City encourage? Airport - related businesses that promote small business, travel service that brings tours to Ukiah. 5. In your opinion, what type of Airport programs or Airport development should the City discourage? Non -airport related business on airport property; 6. What kind of ideal community do you envision for Ukiah? Multi -faced approach to resolving economic crisis facing our community and'increase our visibility that showcases our strengths. 7. Do you have any known projects or conflict of interest related to this Commission (business and/or personal)? No. 8. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives. will be beneficial to the work of the Airport Commission? Previously appointed and served 2 terms; prior Chair of Airport Commission; leadership and management skills; creative thinker; business leader. 9. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on which you would be yviliin(to serve? Recreatiotl committe%ommission Jun 2D G.D Signature of Applicant Date Thank you for your interest in serving your community and the City of Ukiah. Please return this application and attachments to the City Clerk's office by Friday, June 3, 2011, 5 pm to 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482. If you have any questions, please contact the City Clerk's office at (707) 463-6217. E:\Airport Commission\Airport Commission 20111application_airport commission 10.doc s •-- )eerwester{. firr•�, h .`} r ,� ,.:.>_ l i r N. Oak Street, Ukiah, CA 95482 �7�lglR.�s��f; �.,y•• (" r` fi j1417 ®�titCr?' ,�,,b`�x •�;Ei• �r1'�..� X k r.. 'a•b. v 707 )468-0213 � ;'=Yy. :.;r,.: :M,�:� �e•S-Y"�'ri*hos�; • • • • • • • - ' 0 - • -• ;if�T�'bn =MT .� � r r1 ., •�Z,.--{--'-..-•-^.•,s,-` •..; •yr. � a• � �r } yrW ".:a 3A .". t . ••f��h'? ` a� � z� k 'ivy `mac*. `moi• a i"ic� S Yr i , ^s.'`.e, ✓ . yi\sem` �L F.J-�y'e/•'�.,;�., ry 4 Currently VFW Post 1900,.American Legion •tai: 4,t�i?+ .,;t„sr`�.°x •z:^ui'�}t� r��,tf,�>.� B. Please answer the following on a separate sheet(s) of paper and attach. 1. Why are you applying to serve on the City of Ukiah's Airport Commission? Previously appointed. Went on active duty with the military and previous appointment expired. Previously served 2 terms. Would like to offer my services again to the Airport Commission and to the community. 2. What is your understanding of the purpose, role, and responsibility of the Airport Commission? Provide recommendations to City Council, provide guidance to staff re: airport -related issues. 3. What do you believe are the three most important Airport: related issues facing our community and why? (1) Use of airport facilities for non -airport related businesses, (2) airport on residential community, (3) positive impact airport has on Ukiah and Mendocino County. 4. In your opinion, what type of Airport programs or Airport development should the City encourage? Airport - related businesses that promote small business, travel service that brings tours to Ukiah. 5. In your opinion, what type of Airport programs or Airport development should the City discourage? Non -airport related business on airport property; 6. What kind of ideal community do you envision for Ukiah? Multi -faced approach to resolving economic crisis facing our community and'increase our visibility that showcases our strengths. 7. Do you have any known projects or conflict of interest related to this Commission (business and/or personal)? No. 8. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives. will be beneficial to the work of the Airport Commission? Previously appointed and served 2 terms; prior Chair of Airport Commission; leadership and management skills; creative thinker; business leader. 9. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on which you would be yviliin(to serve? Recreatiotl committe%ommission Jun 2D G.D Signature of Applicant Date Thank you for your interest in serving your community and the City of Ukiah. Please return this application and attachments to the City Clerk's office by Friday, June 3, 2011, 5 pm to 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482. If you have any questions, please contact the City Clerk's office at (707) 463-6217. E:\Airport Commission\Airport Commission 20111application_airport commission 10.doc JoAnne Currie From: Deerwester, Dorothy "Dottie" [Dorothy. Deerwester@va.gov] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 11:42 AM To: JoAnne Currie Subject: Airport Commission Re -Appointment Request Hi Joanne - I understand the application for appointment to the Airport Commission are due today. I am no longer on Active Duty and am submitting my name for re -appointment to the Airport Commission. As I'm no longer on Active Duty status, I expect to be able to attend meetings on a regular basis. My contact information is: Dottie Deerwester P.O. Box 518 Ukiah, CA 95482 W: 707-337-6088 (cell # - phone and text) Email: dorothy.deerwesterOva.gov - which also goes to my cell phone. Is there anything else I need to do at this point? Thank you. Dottie Dottie Deerwester, MA Chief Operations Officer VA Outpatient Clinic Ukiah & Clearlake A division of the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center 707-468-7725 (Ukiah) - 707-995-7238 (Clearlake) Cell: 707-337-6088 dorothy.deerwester@va.gov Request for Reappointment Name of CommissioniCommittee/Board City of Ukiah Building Board of Appeals you are seekiqa reappointment Full Name Jim Apperson Date . 4-24-11 Residence Address (Physical Address, not PQ 700 lone Pine Drive, Redwood Valley, CA 95470 Mailing Address P.O. Box 366, Redwood Valley, CA 95470-0366 if different from above Home Phone 1707 ) 485-0264 Work T07 ) 485-5158 Phone Email Jim@appersonenergymanagement.com Cell Phone ( ) Employer Self- Apperson Energy Management Job Title/Position Owner Employed Since 1975 How long have you resided in: Ukiah? Mendocino County? 30+ years California? 60+ years North Coast Builders Exchange, HERS rater, Title 24 special inspector, Please list community groups or Certified Green Building Professional, BPI certified as an Envelope organizations you are affiliated Professional and a Building Analyst, member CBPCA, member Efficiency with and list any offices held. First, General Building Contractor, Insulation Contractor, Window Contractor. This Board has not yet been called upon to meet in it's official capacity. I would like the opportunity to serve again and, hopefully, actually meet as a board member at a functioning board meeting with an issue to discuss. Additional Comments? RECEIVED CITY of UKIIAH MAY - 3 2011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT CITY OF UKIAH PARKS, RECREATION & GOLF COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT A. General Information a:Cg�/l B. Please answer the following on a separate sheet(s) of paper and attach. 1. Why are you applying to serve on the City of Ukiah's Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 2. What is your understanding of the purpose, role and responsibility of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 3. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives will be beneficial to the work of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 4. What do you believe is the single most important parks, recreation, and golf issue facing our community? And why? 5. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City encourage? 6. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City discourage? 7. What kind of ideal community do you envision for Ukiah? 8. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on which you would be willing to serve? Signature of Date Thank you for your interest in serving your community and the City of Ukiah. Please return this application and attachments to the City Clerk's office by Friday Jun to 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482. If you have any questions, please contact t office at (707) 463-6217. SAAdministration\City Clerk\Boards and Commissions\application_prgc_10.doc JUN 0.3 2011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT Parks, Recreation & Golf Commission Application for Appointment attachment B-1 Why are you applying to serve on the City of Ukiah's Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? I have an interest in what happens to the golf course and because I have grandchildren who use the parks regularly I also care about what happens to the parks. B-2 What is your understanding of the purpose, role and responsibility of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? The responsibility of the Commission is to provide input and advice regarding the use of the parks and golf course facilities. To give input to maintain a level of use for all of the community. B-3 How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives will be beneficial to the work of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? I have previously served on the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission as a member from the Ladies Golf Club and as a member at large prior to 2003. As a member of the community for 50+ years and the golfing community for 25+ years I care what happens to our parks and golf course. I have grandchildren who use and love the park system in Ukiah. When I resigned from my position on the Commission it was because I had taken a position with Pacific Women's Golf Association and time wise there was a conflict. I served as Redwood Area Director for 2 years and our area was from the Oregon border to the Golden Gate Bridge with 36+/- clubs. I then went on to serve 1 year as Vice President and then 1 year as President. Our Association has 10,000+/- members. I have also served in elected offices of our local Ukiah golf club. B-4 What do you believe is the single most important parks, recreation and golf issue facing our community? And why? I believe the most important issue for Parks, Recreation and Golf is to maintain the current level of usage and availability for the community. I would not encourage new programs that would burden the community financially at this time. The reason why is because of the financial climate of our County at the present time. B-5 In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the city encourage? As I stated above, I believe it is the commission's responsibility to maintain the current level of recreation and the parks and golf course maintained so that they can be enjoyed by all of the community. I believe that Ukiah has great recreation programs for all ages of the Community. B-6 In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the city discourage? At this time the City should not think of starting any new programs B-7 What kind of ideal community do you envision for Ukiah? I envision for the community a place where people can have use of the parks and recreation programs at a reasonable fee along with the golf course so that all members of the community are able to participate in whatever activity they choose. B-8 Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on which you would be willing to serve? It would depend on what Committee/Commissions are available. CITY OF UKIAH PARKS. RECREATION & GOLF COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT A. General Information B. Please answer the following on a separate sheet(s) of paper and attach. 1. Why are you applying to serve on the City of Ukiah's Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 2. What is your understanding of the purpose, role and responsibility of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 3. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives will be beneficial to the work of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 4. What do you believe is the single most important parks, recreation, and golf issue facing our community? And why? 5. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City encourage? 6. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City discourage? 7. What kind of ideal community do you envision for Ukiah? 8. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on w ' yo ould be willin to sere . Signature of ApoaX4 Date Thank you for your interest in serving your community and the City of Ukiah. Please return this application and attachments to the City Clerk's office by Friday Jun C4 to 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482. If you have any questions, please contac office at (707) 463-6217. SAAdministration\City Clerk\Boards and Commissions\application_prgc_lo.doc MAY 232011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT Residence Atltlress P`sicaCAdtlress�notPQ - �.!e-We vuot, qL 2 K .0 ,y�j Mai�}g��ddress j �faii�reren�,frot�i at�oue g - t {Qmetone n — G — — Work Phonety ��. ,1►�tiN w -J: ���w r t cM :Gel} Phone �`�-- �z^�� I E"mployer C Business Address ®4-j'B S-� �-e e� " 4 C s- Y L JQb Title/Positions, Em to ed SinceC 2c�C� t 94�..� How Cong ;have you resided m Ukrah� Mendociro County CalFfornFa? rs �� , y3 Please Ilst community groups or V{1 e",O -14- ll !'�tw v C.i,44y s.Ae`,-kt Lt. Iu'IC- 1 ,�,e G h-�- }ey(.fk. Pr, r Organiz�tlonS you are'affil�ated �w�ih�and Itst,anyzoffces held � bt to{} FaY O� �� r O k4fS 7 �JVYe� y� 7^Aralb-seS � :} b wcfiM�`` ��12, lb.eA-+i> a;Viefi, B. Please answer the following on a separate sheet(s) of paper and attach. 1. Why are you applying to serve on the City of Ukiah's Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 2. What is your understanding of the purpose, role and responsibility of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 3. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives will be beneficial to the work of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 4. What do you believe is the single most important parks, recreation, and golf issue facing our community? And why? 5. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City encourage? 6. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City discourage? 7. What kind of ideal community do you envision for Ukiah? 8. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on w ' yo ould be willin to sere . Signature of ApoaX4 Date Thank you for your interest in serving your community and the City of Ukiah. Please return this application and attachments to the City Clerk's office by Friday Jun C4 to 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482. If you have any questions, please contac office at (707) 463-6217. SAAdministration\City Clerk\Boards and Commissions\application_prgc_lo.doc MAY 232011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT Application Questions 1) I'm applying to serve on the commission because I have always been interested in public service and find that I now have the time to do something to give back to the community. I am originally from the Chicago area and moved to Mendocino county a little over 10 years ago. Back in the midwest my family was involved in local government and I had an uncle who served on Chicago's park board. I feel that Ukiah is a wonderful place to live and raise a family and I would like to be a part of maintaining the family friendly small town atmosphere we have here. For the past few years I have been involved with starting a business and that has taken up most of my time. At this point my business is doing well and I can devote some of my time and energy to other pursuits. I have always been a active individual and I believe the park commission would be a good fit for me. 2) In my understanding the purpose of the commission is to oversee the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities for the city of Ukiah. To do so in a fiscally responsible manner that gives the people of the community the best facilities and programs possible while -keeping costs down. 3) 1 believe that anyone who starts and runs a business has to have a skills set that would make them an asset to an agency like the commission. You have to have good people skills to deal with your employees and clients. You have to have good organizational skills. You have to be good with record keeping and a budget. You need to be both knowledgeable about the service you provide and be able to keep up with advances in the field. You also need to be creative and flexible. And finally, you need to be a self-starting and self -motivated individual. I believe I possess this skills set and that I would be a good choice for the commission. 4) 1 feel that the single most important issue facing our community is trying to maintain quality facilities and programs in an era where there is less money for these programs. It is an issue that all local governmental agencies are facing and one that personally see impacting our educational programs as part of my work. I believe this will be the biggest challenge we face and I don't see things getting any better in terms of there being more public monies for these types of programs any time soon. I think it will take a commission that will have to be creative and will have to look to a variety of sources of revenue in the future. 5) 1 think that the city of Ukiah already has a number of wonderful programs and activities. Personally, I would like to see more tennis programs. I have been an avid tennis player and many long years ago played on my college tennis team. If I were to be on the commission I would make one of my top priorities the repair and maintenance of existing tennis courts and the possible construction of new courts. I -think-that_tennisis_a_great_sport__that_gi_ves you -a -good wor_kout-and-in-which you -use— - - - - - a number of muscle groups. I think it's a great activity that people of all ages can participate in. 6) 1 would not say there is any type of program that should be discouraged, but I would say that any new programs or facilities should be sustainable. If we establish new programs or construct new facilities we should consider not only the start up costs but what will be required to keep those programs going or for maintenance costs for facilities, including long-term costs associated with possible remodeVrebuilding as the facility ages. 7) 1 think this is a pretty darn good community right now. If I didn't think so I wouldn't have invested in starting a business in this town. I think my background and choice of business reflects my commitment to keeping this a family friendly town. I think the challenge is to regulate growth so that we can maintain our small town feel into the future. I would like this to continue to be a great small town, where people can raise families in a relatively safe environment. In terms of parks and recreation, I have expressed my thoughts about maintaining quality programs and facilities as funding becomes more scarce. I think this key to maintaining our quality of life. 8) At this time I'm not interested in serving on other committees or commissions. I do have an interest in planning, but I am not interested in taking that on at this time. CITY OF UKIAH PARKS, RECREATION & GOLF COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT A. General Information B. Please answer the following on a separate sheet(s) of paper and attach. 1. Why are you applying to serve on the City of Ukiah's Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 2. What is your understanding of the purpose, role and responsibility of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 3. How do you believe your own skills, experience, expertise and perspectives will be beneficial to the work of the Parks, Recreation and Golf Commission? 4. What do you believe is the single most important parks, recreation, and golf issue facing our community? And why? 5. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City encourage? 6. In your opinion what type or types of parks development or recreational and golf programs should the City discourage? 7. What kind of ideal community do you envision for Ukiah? 8. Are there any other City of Ukiah Committees/Commissions in which you are interested and on which you would be willing to serve? Signatbre of Applicant 7 '-( -- Date Thank you for your interest in serving your community and the City of Ukiah. r% Wo r% Please return this application and attachments to the City Clerk's office by FridayJun" 9 F. % - to 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482. If you have any questions, please contact he City ngrrs office at (707) 463-6217. JUN 0 3 2011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT G�L-�+ U-�� --rct-� i JJ w 4-o Request for Reappointment Name of Commission/Committee/Board Paths, Open Space and Creeks Commission are -see nreappointment --.you Pull Name Bob Neale Date June 1, 2011 Residence Address 200 Rosemary Lane Ukiah CA 95482 Ph sical Address, not PO): Mailing Address if different from above Home Phone - (707 ) 463-3596 Work ( 707 ) 544-5614 x 1 Phone Email bob@sonomalandtrust.org Cell Phone ( 707 ) 391-3732 Employer Sonoma Land Trust Job Title/Position Stewardship Director Employed Since 2004 How long have you resided in: Ukiah? 2002 Mendocino County? 2002 California? 1960 None Please list community groups or organizations you are affiliated with and list any offices held. I look forward to continuing working with POSCC, the City and the community. Thank you for the opportunity. Additional Comments? RECEIVED CITY OF UKIAH JUN 0 3 2011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT RECEIVED CITY OF i1KIAH Request for Reappointment MAY 1 0 2011 CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT Name of Paths, Open Space, and Creeks Commission Commission/Committee/Board you are seekinj _reappointment James : Full Name onne on, r. Date 4/28/11 Residence Address 906 N. Oak St., Ukiah, CA. 95482 (Physical Address, not PO Mailing Address if different from above Home Phone 07) 68-9644 Work ( ) Phone Email jamle-connertomoyanoo.com Cell Phone J707) 534-9677 Employer retired, public school eac er Job Title/Position NA Employed Since NA How long have. you resided in: Ukiah? 30 yr. Mendocino 30 y. r California? yr. Coun ? currently POSCC Commissioner, past chairperson, current scribe (secretary). Please list community groups or Volunteer Ukiah High School Track and Field Coach organizations you are affiliated Mendocino County Veterans for Peace, current V.P. with and list any offices held. look forward to the opportunity to continue serving on POSCC. Additional Comments? ' f x� ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2011 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSION; BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS; PARKS, RECREATION & GOLF COMMISSION; AND PATHS, OPEN SPACE, & CREEKS COMMISSION WHEREAS, the annual expiration of terms for City Commissions occur on June 30, 2011; and WHEREAS, the vacancies were duly advertised until the close of applications on June 3, 2011, with submitted applications timely received and submitted to Council for consideration; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ukiah City Council approved the nominations submitted per procedures outlined in Resolution No. 2001-61, and do hereby appoint the following persons to terms on the following Commissions and Committees: AIRPORT COMMISSION filling an unexpired term of office for a City resident expiring on June 30, 2013; filling the term of office for a City resident expiring on June 30, 2014; filling the term of office for a representative of Mendocino County expiring on June 30, 2014; BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS Jim Apperson filling the term expiring on June 30, 2014; PARKS, RECREATION AND GOLF COMMISSION filling the term of office for a Women's Golf Club representative expiring on June 30, 2014; filling the term of office for a Mendocino County resident expiring on June 30, 2014; filling the term of office for a City (or Mendocino County) resident or expiring on June 30, 2014; PATHS, OPEN SPACE, AND CREEKS COMMISSION James Connerton filling the term of office for a City resident expiring on June 30, 2014; Robert Neale III filling the term of office for a Mendocino County resident or expiring on June 30, 2014; PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 2011, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Mayor Pro tempore ATTEST: JoAnne M. Currie, City Clerk a Law Offices Of RAPPORT AND MARSTON An Association of Sole Practitioners 405 W. Perkins Street P.O. Box 488 Ukiah, California 95482 e-mail: drapport(a)pacbell.net David J. Rapport Lester J. Marston Scott Johnson Darcy C. Vaughn May 24, 2011 RT Enterprises 1475 Eureka Road Roseville, CA 95661 RE: Rancho Del Rey Mobile Home Park, Ukiah, CA 95482 Our File No. 3.25.1.1 A Dear Sir or Madam: (707)462-6846 FAX 462-4235 I am the City Attorney for the City of Ukiah. The City has received a complaint that the Rancho Del Rey Mobile Home Park in Ukiah has not charged tenants for sewer service in accordance with the requirements of Ukiah City Code §§ 3962 and 3963. Those sections prescribe the calculations that are required to charge sewer service, where water is provided to a mobile home park through a master meter and the mobile home park uses submeters installed at each mobile home space. Section 3961 of the Ukiah City Code requires the mobile home park to provide each tenant with certain information when the park sends the monthly bill for sewer service to the tenant. That information includes the master meter reading for that month and the computation used by the mobile home park to calculate each tenant's pro rata share for sewer service. Section 3961 of the City Code gives the City a right of access to these records during regular business hours, including the right to examine, audit, or copy them. In order to respond to this complaint, I need the required records for the months of January through April. I would appreciate receiving copies of the records within ten days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me. S'I IV trs1 I'dt I- hileipnses.sewcr cumI)him wpd Very tr urs, DA RA P RT Ukiah City Attorney 12 (3 Letter to RT Enterprises May 24, 2011 RE: Rancho Del Rey Mobile Home Park cc: Jeb U. Burton, Esq. 555 University Avenue, Suite 275 Sacramento, CA 95825 Harry Swank 660 Leslie Street Ukiah, CA 95482 RT Enterprises 5703 McHenry Avenue Modesto, CA 95356 Jane Chambers, Ukiah City Manager SMXI Irsl I`It I I-nterpIIses.srarr cumplaim.wpd Page 2 Estimate of Average Annual Potential Groundwater Recharge Volume Contributing to the City of Ukiah Water Supply Sources Average Estimated Tributary Watershed Volume Total (square miles) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) Potential For Groundwater Recharge Surface Water Sources Russian River East Fork 105 77,000 I West Fork 100 126,000 2 Eel River Imports -- 102,300 3 Total Surface Water Sources: 305,300 Potential Runnoff from Tributary Area Ukiah Valley Tributary Watershed: 116 146,160 Ukiah Valley 21 26,460 Total Potential Run-off from Tributary Area 172,620 4 NOTES: Estimated flow based on gaged flow at USGS Gage #11461500 East Fork Russian River Near Calpella, CA less Potter Valley Project imports, as recorded at USGS gage # 11471099 Potter Valley Project (tail race only) near Potter Valley, CA. Period of record water year 1976 through 2002. 2 Average annual Gage flow recorded at USGS gage # 11461000 Russian River Near Ukiah, CA. Period of record 1912-2010. 3 Estimated future Eel River imports 4 Total water from preciptation tributary to and falling on the Ukiah Valley. Assumes run- off of 1,260 acre-feet per square mile, as measured at West Fork gage. 6/8/2011 GAUKIAH, CITY OF\Analysis\2110-019P-Unimpaired flow in Ukiah Valley.xlsx