Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2009-07-01 Packet
CITY OF COUNCILCITY AGENDA Regular• COUNCILCIVIC CENTER 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 2009July 1, J 1 • 3. PROCLAMATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation Recognizing M. Lee Wachs 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Regular Adjourned Minutes of June 16, 2009 b. Regular Minutes of June 17, 2009 6. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION Persons who are dissatisfied with a decision of the City Council may have the right to a review of that decision by a court. The City has adopted Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which generally limits to ninety days (90) the time within which the decision of the City Boards and Agencies may be judicially challenged. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items listed are considered routine and will be enacted by a single motion and roll call vote by the City Council. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar upon request of a Councilmember or a citizen in which event the item will be considered at the completion of all other items on the agenda. The motion by the City Council on the Consent Calendar will approve and make findings in accordance with Administrative Staff and/or Planning Commission recommendations. a. Notification of Sole Source Purchase of Radio Scanning System and Installation Services from Fisher Wireless in the Amount of $6,488.44. b. Award Purchase of Sodium Hydroxide to Univar USA, Inc. at the Unit Price of $535.00 per Dry Ton for a Total Approximate Amount of $21,400.00. C. Adopt the Dispatch Budget for City of Fort Bragg Contractual Dispatching Services and Approve a Budget Amendment for an Additional Revenue Increase of $293,517.61 and Expense of $293,517.61 d. Update Report Regarding Status of Water Emergency Conditions Necessitating Emergency Resolution to Expedite Construction of Gobbi Street Water Well e. Update Report Regarding Status of Water Emergency Conditions Necessitating Emergency Resolution to Expedite Construction of Oak Manor Drive Water Well The City Council welcomes input from the audience. If there is a matter of business on the agenda that you are interested in, you may address the Council when this matter is considered. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on this agenda, you may do so at this time. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to three (3) minutes per person and not more than ten (10) minutes per subject. The Brown Act regulations do not allow action to be taken on audience comments in which the subject is not listed on the agenda. a. Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution Approving Application and Contract Execution for Funding from the General Allocation of the State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and Authorizing Execution of Grant Agreement and any Amendments thereto with the State of California for the Purposes of this Grant. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Adoption of Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan b. Local Emergency Declaration Regarding Drought Status 11. NEW BUSINESS a. Adopt Plans and Specifications No. 09-08 for the Reconstruction of the Ukiah Airport Storm Drain System and Approve Advertisement for Bids 14. CLOSED SESSION — Closed Session may be held at any time during the meeting 15. ADJOURNMENT Please be advised that the City needs to be notified 72 hours in advance of a meeting if any specific accommodations or interpreter services are needed in order for you to attend. The City complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request. Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the front counter at the Ukiah Civic Center, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482, during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 7:30 am to 5:00 pm. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Ukiah City Hall, located at 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda. Dated this 26th day of June, 2009. Linda C. Brown, City Clerk 3a W11-11161 IW41K Y 1 The City of Ukiah Proclamation is presented this 1st day of July, 2009 to M. Lee Wachs in appreciation for his volunteer efforts that played a key role in the successful return of the Ukiah Airport Day WHEREAS, Mr. Wachs has been involved in more than 13 Ukiah Air Shows in the past; WHEREAS, Mr. Wachs successfully found vendors, performers and advertising for this year's Ukiah Airport Day event that took place on June 20, 2009; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wachs provided 8 hours of commentary during the Ukiah Airport Day telling stories about aviation, speaking about the aircraft on display and keeping the public entertained throughout the event; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Douglas F. Crane, City Councilmember of the City of Ukiah, on behalf of my fellow City Councilmembers, Mari Rodin, Benj Thomas, Mary Anne Landis, and Mayor Phil Baldwin and the people of the City of Ukiah, do hereby express our gratitude to you, M. Lee Wachs, for your wonderful community involvement and your love and commitment to aviation and the Ukiah Airport. Signed and sealed, this 1St day of July, in the year Two Thousand and Nine. CITY OF UKIAH 5a CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Regular Meeting CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, CA 95482 June 16, 2009 5:30 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL Ukiah City Council met at an Adjourned Regular Meeting on June 16, 2009, the notice for which being legally noticed on June 11, 2009. Mayor Baldwin called the meeting to order at 5:40 pm. Roll was taken with the following Councilmembers present: Landis (arriving 5:50 pm), Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. Councilmembers absent: Rodin. Staff present: City Manager Chambers, Director of Finance Elton, Electric Utility Director Grandi, Airport Manager Owen, Director of Community and General Services Sangiacomo, Community Services Supervisor Merz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Eriksen, Director of Public Safety Dewey, Director of Planning and Community Development Stump, Director of Human Resources Harris, and Deputy City Clerk Currie. 2. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS None. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 BUDGET — 5:30 p.m. 5:41:39 PM A. Overview of City Finar 1. Current Fiscal C 2. Future Forecast,, 3. Ongoing Budget Manager - city enditure Comparisons presented the item. B. Review of General Budget Figures — Finance Director 6:03:58 PM Finance Director Elton presented the item. C. Review of Performance Measures and Services Electric Utility 6:57:59 PM Electric Utility Director Grandi presented the item. Airport /: i ym Fm Airport Manager Owen presented the item. Community Services 7:31:18 PM Community Services Director Sangiacomo and Community Services Supervisor Merz presented the item. Public Works 7:49:43 PM Director of Public Works/City Engineer Eriksen presented the item. Public Safety 8:15:43 PM Director of Public Safety Dewey presented the item. ® General Government Director of Planning and Community Development Stump presented the Department's budget item. 8:38:53 PM Mayor Baldwin recommended not increasing the City Council's Conference and Travel budget. M/S Crane/Landis to approve not increasing the City Council's Conference and Travel and leave it at $3500. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Landis, Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. 9:02:57 PM Public Speaking to the item: None. Public Hearing Closed 9:05 pm Recessed to the Ukiah Redevelopment Agency 9:05 pm. 4. ADJOURNMENT: TO MEET AS THE UKIAH F REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A UKIAH 1. ROLL CALL Chairperson Baldwin called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Roll was taken with the following Commissioners present: Landis, Thomas, Crane,, and Chairperson Baldwin. Commissioners absent: Rodin. Staff present: Executive Director Chambers, Finance Director Elton, and Recording SecretaryCurrie. 2. AUDIENCE COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS 9:06:35 PM None. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 BUDGET 9:07:00 PM hambers,presented the item. - Public Hearing Opened 9:21 pn Public Speaking to the [item: Nom Public Hearing Closed 9:21 pm M/S Landis/Thomas to adopt the 2009/2010 Ukiah Redevelopment Agency Budget as submitted. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Landis, Thomas, Crane, and Chairperson Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. There being RECONVENE AS THE CITY COUNCIL 9:21:24 PM business, the meeting adjourned at 9:21 pm. A. Adopt the 2009/2010 General Fund and Other Fund Budgets (except for Wastewater and Water) 9:21:45 PM Finance Director Elton presented the item and provided City Council with an updated resolution to adopt the General Fund and Other Fund Budgets which included the following amendments: Exclude the Park Bonds Fund from the resolution as this budget will be brought back as part of the capital projects budget; Reduce Airport fuel sales revenue by $72,000; and The Debt schedule, page ES -14 only listed one of the two internal loans owed by the Golf Enterprise as the revised page adds the October 2008 equipment loan to the list. MIS Landis/Thomas to adopt the 2009/2010 General Fund and Other Fund Budgets except for Wastewater and Water as amended. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Landis, Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. 9:22:15 PM 6. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UKIAH AUTHORIZING CONTINUED MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER & WATER OPERATIONS PENDING ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 BUDGET 7. M/S Landis/Thomas to adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ukiah Authorizing Continued Municipal Wastewater & Water Operations Pending Adoption of Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Budget. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Landis, Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. 9:24:46 PM ENTERPRISES Director of Finance Elton presented the item. Re Stabilization Funds for the Waste and Wastewater fiscal year 2008/2009. MIS Crane/Landis to approve the recommended action. Moti call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Landis, Thomas, Crane, None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. 8. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:31 pm. Establish Rate ie beginning of by the following roll r Baldwin. NOES: CITY OF COUNCILCITY Regular Meeting 00 Seminary Avenue 2009Ukiah, CA 95482 June 17, 00 . 1. ROLL CALL Ukiah City Council met at a Regular Meeting on June being legally noticed on June 12, 2009. Mayor Baldwir 6:07 pm. Roll was taken with the following Councilmetr Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. Councilmembers absen Manager Chambers, City Attorney Rapport, C6rrienur' Director of Planning and Community Developmen Administrator Mills, Director of Public lltferks/City I Community and General Services Sangiacorno, Direct( Deputy City Clerk Currie. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE City Attorney Rapport brought forth an consideration to be added to the agend M/S Crane/Landis finding; thol and posting of the agericfa,'an Authorizing the City Aft rney to Counties in Litigation Cnallengi of the City's Street Maint4nanc Councilmembers:::La,ndis, Tho Councilmeni, rRodin.°ABSTAI 6. 7. to the Item 5b 17, 2009, the notice for which called the meeting to order at bers',present: Landis, Thomas, Rodin Staff present: City ity Services Supervisor Merz, Stump, Project and Grant :ngineer Eriksen, Director, of r,, -of Electric Utility Grandi, and unci) for emergencyaituation eA§ts'that arose after the preparation add to the agenda the'Urgency Item, "Adopt A Resolution perate with the League of California Cities, Other Cities and ie Con stitutionalityof Any Seizure by the State Government rods.' Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Grane�-acid Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: Ione. as Iterr%-11`d. RIGHT TO APPEAL DECISION 6:10:15 PM ENTATI CONSENT CALENDAR 6:12:17 PM M/S Crane/Thomas to approve the Consent Calendar items 7a-71: a. Report of Disbursements for the Month of May 2009 b. Rejection of Claim for Damages Received from Mendocino County Employees Retirement Association and Referral to Joint Powers Authority, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund CC 6/17/09 Page 1 of 6 C. Notification of Purchase of Cisco Catalyst 3750e Network Switch From AT&T Datacom in the Amount of $7,947.56 d. Report to Council for the Purchase of LaserPiche Software and Maintenance/Support from ECS Imaging for the Period of 6/20/2009 through 6/19/2010 in the Amount of $5,390.36 e. Report to the City Council Regarding Payment to City of Light Sound and Recording for the Sound Equipment and Sound Technician Services for the 2009 Sundays in the Park Concert Series in the Amount of $9,600 f. Report to the City Council Regarding the Purchase of Services for the Printing of the 2009 Summer Recreation Guide in the Amount of $5,764.91 g. Authorize City Manager to Negotiate and Sign a Three -Year Audit Services Contract Extension with Davis Hammon & Co., CPA`s` for a Total First Year Contract Cost not to Exceed $32,910 h. Adopt Plans and Specifications No. 09-11 for the~ Replacement of 120 Electric Utility Poles and Approve Advertisement for Bids i. Update Report on Local Emergency Declaration Regarding ,Drought and Water Shortage Status j. Award the Purchase of 600 Tons of Fractured 3/4" Minus Aggregate to S -Bar -S Quarry in the Amount of $12,294.00 k. Update Report Regarding Status of Water Emergency Conditions Necessitating Emergency Resolution to Expedite Consit' c -tion of Oak Manor Drive Water Well I. Update Report Regarding Status of Water Emergency Conditions Necessitating Emergency Resolution toFpedite Construction of Gobbi Street Water Well Motion carried by the following roll oalir Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None None. 8. AUDIENCE COMM'E'NTS C None. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. .:Review and"Action AYES: Councilrnembers Landis, Thomas, SENT: Couricilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: Site Development Permit — Low Gap Park Director OUPlanning 6tnd"Community Development Stump and Project and Grant Administratdr�Mills presented the item and provided a Memorandum addressing pnuisance and ,'Vandalism. Recommended Action(s): 1. Conduct a public hearing; 2. Consider the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Mitigated Negtve Declaration and Site Development Permit; and 3. Approve the Mitigafed Negative Declaration and Site Development Permit based on the findings anci subject to the conditions of approval listed on pages 2-5 of this Agenda` -,Summary Report. Public Hearing Opened 6: 22 pm Public Speaking in support of the item: Mo Mulheren, Skate Park Committee; Linda Sanders; Janna Ostoyce; and Kjell Akerstrom. Public Hearing Closed 6:29 pm M/S Crane/Landis to approve the mitigated Negative Declaration and Site Development Permit based on the findings and subject to the conditions of approval listed on pages 2-5 of the 6/17/09 Agenda Summary Report and listed memorandum dated 6/17/09. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: CC 6/17/09 Page 2 of 6 AYES: Councilmembers Landis, Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. 6:29:38 PM 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Status Report Regarding Mendocino County's Analysis of Potential Impacts Resulting from the Mendocino Crossings Masonite Specific Plan 6:33:20 PM Director of Planning and Community Development Stump presented the item. Recommended Action: Receive Report. Public Comment Opened 6:35 pm Public Speaking to the item: John Graff, citizen. Public Comment Closed 6:37 pm By Consensus, City Council received th b. City Council to Discuss Support Recommended Action: Discuss Public Comment Opened 6:40 pm Public Speaking to the item: Don Rowe. Public Comment Closest 6:44 pm Mandatary Water Conservation Measures Water Users 6:43:20 PM mandatory restrictions should not result in loss of property or financial p. on., -Utility customers, but prohibit nonessential and unauthorized water use, 1. Use through any meter when the City has notified the customer in writing to repair a broken or defective plumbing, sprinkler, watering or irrigation system and the customer has failed to effect such repairs within five days. 2. Use of water which results in flooding or runoff in gutters or streets (The City encourages the use of commercial car wash facilities). 3. Use of water through a hose for washing cars, buses, boats, trailers or other vehicles in the public right of way or any other location that creates runoff in gutter or streets. CC 6/17/09 Page 3 of 6 4. Use of water through a hose for washing buildings, structures, sidewalks, walkways, driveways, patios, parking lots, tennis courts, or other hard - surfaced areas that creates runoff in gutter or streets. 5. Service of water by any restaurant except upon the request of a patron. 6. Use of water to flush hydrants, except where required for public health or safety. 7. Use for more than minimal landscaping in connection with new construction. Enforcement of these mandatory restrictions would be progressive and could include: 1. Educational letter or visit. 2. Educational visit and warning. 3. Installation of flow restrictor. 4. Shutoff and reconnection fee. M/S Crane/Thomas to approve 7 mandbto%water conservation measures with 4 enforcement measures starting Jul -y; -'I, 2009. Motion carrile by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembors Landis, Thomas, Crane;, -and Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: CouncilmemberRodin. ABSTAIN: None. Public Comm ent,'Qpened 7.10 prn 7:10:39 PM Public Speaking to,the item: John Graff, citizen. Public` Lament' [used 7:12 pm 7:12:06 PM Resurfacing, Specification f and Director of Community the item and provided a Dmmended Action: Award Specification No. 08-08, to bids submitted on June 16, M/S Land istThomas to`"`approve the award of contract for Oak Manor Tennis Courts Resur Seng, Specification No. 08-08, to the lowest bidder, Siri Grading & Paving. Motioq?'carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Lan,dis, Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. NOES: None. ABSENT: Couneilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. b. MCOG Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) Amendment 7:14:02 PM City Manager Chambers and Director of Electric Utility Grandi presented the item. Recommended Action: Council discuss Mendocino Council of Governments' (MCOG) request and provide direction to city staff for further review and analysis of the proposal. Public Comment Opened 7:17 pm Public Speaking to the item: Tony Orth, Renewable Energy and the Mendocino Activists for a Dependable Economy (REMADE). Public Comment Closed 7:26 pm CC 6/17/09 Page 4 of 6 M/S Landis/Thomas to continue the item and directed staff to investigate the implications of the JPA. Motion carried by an all AYE voice vote of the members present. Recessed as City Council and convened as Ukiah Redevelopment Agency at 7:27 pm. Reconvened as City Council at 9:03 pm. i" C. Discussion And Recommended Approval Of The Acquisition Of Real Property In The Redwood Business Park/Airport Industrial Park; Authorization For The City Manager/Executive Director To Execute All Of The Necessary Purchase And Option Agreenibrits, , And Approval Of Corresponding Budget Amendment In The Amount Of $4,193,615 Plus All Associated Costs For Closing 9:03:41 PM City Attorney Rapport, Director of Community and General Services Sangiacomo, and Project and Grant Adml ti5trator Millspresented the item. Recommended Action(s): 1) Approve the Assignment- and Assumption Agreement with RBP and FYHRGC?, 2) Approve the Purchase- A'gre6ment with Legacy Four -Ukiah, and 3) Authori.26 Ahe City,"�.Manager to execute all of the necessary agreements and purchase documents M/S Crane/Landis to appK9ve the Recommenefed Actions 1, 2, and 3. d. .Urgency Item A;Resdluti1on Authorizing the city Attorney to Cooperate with the Loee of California Cities;` other Cities and Counties in Litigation ChalleingMg the C 6nstitutionality of Any Seizure by State Government of the City's beet Mai #ertance Funds 9:12:19 PM Crane/Thomas to adopt the Resolution. Motion carried by the following roll vote: AYES. Councilmembers Landis, Thomas, Crane, and Mayor Baldwin. S: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Rodin. ABSTAIN: None. Councilmemb& Landis requested the biomass feasibility in Mendocino County effort be added to a future Ukiah Redevelopment Agency agenda. 9:12:51 PM Landis reported the Low Gap Park trail is looking nice. 9:17:38 PM Councilmember Thomas reported on a project that the Economic Development & Financing Economic Development Corporation (EDFC) is working on and that Economic Development Manager Moller has been involved with the process. 9:15:31 PM Mayor Baldwin reported that he will have a written report at a future meeting regarding a fact finding trip he recently went on. 9:16:47 PM CC 6/17/09 Page 5 of 6 13. CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK REPORTS None. Adjourned to closed session concurrent with the closed session for Ukiah Redevelopment Agency at 9:18 pm. 14. CLOSED SESSION — Closed Session may be held at any time during the meeting a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (§ 54956.8); Property: APN 002-281-15-00, 002-281-29-00, 002-281-02-00, 002-281-03-00, and 002-281-04-00 Negotiator: Jane Chambers, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: City of Ukiah and Hardy Schmidbauer Reconvened in Open Session with no reportable action 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 JoAnne M. Currie, Deputy City Clerk CC 6/17/09 Page 6 of 6 ITE O.: 7a ITEETIVG R4TE:00• INSTALLATIONSUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF RADIO SCANNING SYSTEM AND • AMOUNTOF ;; .. Background: As authorized by Council at the January 21St, 2009 City Council Meeting, staff has begun the process of upgrading the Dispatch Center 911 telephone system. A new room has been selected for this installation of the upgraded equipment, while continuing 911 operations in the old dispatch area. This approach will allow the new 911 telephone system to be installed and tested to confirm reliability, while ensuring that on-going day-to-day emergency 911 operations would continue without interruption. Discussion: In 2001 the City Council authorized an $80,000 dollar modernization overhaul of the City's Public Safety Radio System, which is expected to have at least a 20 year lifetime. This upgrade included combining large antennas on the communication tower to reduce visual impacts. This complex project was bid on by radio vendors, and the City used an engineering firm to help determine which system to purchase from the multiple proposals. Fisher Wireless was chosen for the project, and has continued to maintain the complex radio system. Included in the proposed Dispatch 911 Improvement Project budget is the installation of a new pubic safety radio scanning system for the new dispatch center, which connects to the Public Safety Radio System. This new scanning system will support the dispatch center's ability to monitor adjoining police and fire departments emergency operations, and communicate vital information to field units. Because of the engineering involved with the complex radio system, and the need to ensure reliability, staff elected to sole source the additional equipment needed for the new dispatch center's radio scanning system. Staff worked extensively with Fisher Wireless engineers and confirmed parts and labor pricing to ensure the lowest possible pricing was obtained. Staff awarded the bid for the radio scanning system to Fisher Wireless, in the amount of $6,488.44, from accounts 678.2040.800.000. In compliance with Section 1522 of the Ukiah City Code, this report is being submitted to the City Council for the purpose of reporting an acquisition costing $5,000 or more, but less than $10,000. Fiscal Impact: ❑X Budgeted FY 08/09 1-1 New Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addtl. Appropriation Requested $6,488.44 Dispatch Fund 678.2040.800.00 None Continued on Page 2 Recommended Action(s): No action required, notification of purchase of radio scanning system from Fisher Wireless, in the amount of $6,488.44, from account 678.2040.800.000. Alternative Council Option(s): N/A Citizens advised: Requested by: Chris Dewey, Director of Public Safety Prepared by: Chris Dewey, Director of Public Safety Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: Approved: /1�-c,✓- Jan Chambers, City Manager ITEM N MEETING DA City q1-,Uki:ah AGENDA SUMMARY -O- w July 1, 2009 SUBJECT: AWARD PURCHASE OF SODIUM HYDROXIDE TO UNIVAR USA, INC. AT THE UNIT PRICE OF 00 PER D. • FOR A TOTAL APPROXIMATE AMOUNTOF ,00 00 Submitted for the City Council's consideration and action is staff's recommendation that the purchase of approximately 40 dry tons of sodium hydroxide be awarded to Univar USA, Inc. in the amount of $535.00 per dry ton of material for a total amount of $21,400.00. Sodium hydroxide is used at the City's Water Treatment Plant for pH adjustment and corrosion control in the City's water distribution system. In response to the City's Request for Bids, four bids were received. The lowest responsible bidder is Univar USA, Inc. at a unit price of $535.00 per dry ton of sodium hydroxide. Please refer to Attachment 1 for the complete bid opening results. Funds for this purchase are included in the proposed budget for FY '09-10 in fund 820.3908.520.000. Since the budget has not been formally adopted by the City Council for this fund, Staff is requesting authorization to proceed with this purchase utilizing this fund number. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 08/09 1-1 New Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Add'I Appropriation Req. Pumping labor & expense, chemicals 820.3908.520.000 N/A Recommended Action(s): Award the purchase of sodium hydroxide to Univar USA, Inc at the unit price of $535 per dry ton, and authorize the use of fund 820.3908.520.000 for FY'09-10. Alternative Council Option(s): Reject bid and provide direction to Staff. Citizens advised: NIA Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director Prepared by: Mary Horger, Purchasing Supervisor Coordinated with: Alan Jamison, Water Treatment Plant Supervisor, and Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: NIA Approved: = , �-- - a - -==:z, J?�Vthambers, City Manager City of Ureiah 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 BID •1 FOR f1'BID OPENING (Approximately 40 Dry Tons) 1. Univar USA Inc. 8201 South 212th Kent, WA 98032-1994 2. Olin Corporation 700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 250 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 3. Brenntag Pacific, Inc. 10747 Patterson Place Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 [1P►i`M LelC $535.00 per dry ton Approx. total: $21,400.00 $559.90 per dry ton Approx. total: $22,396.00 $589.88 per dry ton Approx. total: $23,595.20 4. Basic Chemical Solutions $592.25 per dry ton 12522 Los Nietos Road Approx. total: $23,690.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Please note: these bids were sent to eighteen (18) chemical companies. ITEM NO.- MEETINd DA City cj,',z_tkz:ah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 7c July 1, 2009 SUBJECT: ADOPT THE DISPATCH BUDGET FOR CITY OF FORT BRAGG CONTRACTUAL DISPATCHING SERVICES AND APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL REVENUE INCREASE OF $293,517.61 AND EXPENSE OF $293,517.61 At the May 20th, 2009 City Council meeting, Council approved a dispatching services contract between the City of Ukiah and the City of Fort Bragg. The contract presented is for a 5 year term, which ranges in revenue from $293,517 for year one, to $341,636 for the last year of the contract, and includes startup costs, training of new personnel and technical infrastructure improvements necessary to support dispatching services in Fort Bragg. Discussion: Because of the on-going negotiations during the City's current budget cycle, the additional revenue and costs associated with the Fort Bragg Contract were not included in the budget adopted by Council at the June 16th 2009, City Council meeting. A budget reflecting the additional revenue and expenses has now been developed and is being presented for approval. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 08/09 ❑ New Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addit. Appropriation Requested $ 0 Fort Bragg Dispatch Contract 678.2050 $293,517.61 (revenue) $ 0 Fort Bragg Dispatch Budget 678.2050 $293,517.61 (expense) Continued on Paae 2 Recommended Action(s): Adopt proposed Fort Bragg Dispatch Budget, and a budget amendment for an additional revenue of $293,517.61 and expense of $293,517.61. Alternative Council Option(s): Provide staff with alternative direction. Citizens advised: Requested by: Chris Dewey, Director of Public Safety Prepared by: Chris Dewey, Director of Public Safety Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: FY 09/10 Budqet Approved:... l- J e Chambers, City Manager ol� cl z m U. w x w /_kk ZL < CD W oz � w w W UZI. - < /U� U 00 'IT co To Cl) xf)-: "i C6 ft ca C\l cm co ,It CD cyl xf)-: ,It cm ft ca C\l 0)00 ,It CD cyl xf)-: It 0) ca E X ATTACHMEN1:— / C: 0 0 C: CO cu ca E X ul cn C: x ui .0 co ATTACHMEN1:— / AL.xa C) ce) m ce) r- C\l CD (D 0 m C.0 0 (D LO co C) ce) O(D 00 I- It C14m Ce0) 00 'd'NO- ) 0 m 0) r- LO — (0 N C) LO It It CC) 0 OO OO C.0 0 CD C) Cl 031 0 ce) 0) ce) r- CN 0) (0 C) m C*4 co LO m CD C0 ce) 0) r-: c3i 00 00 .t C,4 r,- qt C,4 Ce) L6 -.:- CO C\f cT C) LO IT It C) r- 00 to 00 C) cq I,: G� 0 ce) m ce) r- C\l 0) co 0) CN CD LO Cl) C) ce) (Y) m Nr 00 00 14T C\l I- qv C14 Cl) 69- 0') r- LO (D N0 V7 U') r- C\l 69- O 60- O 69- (D 9 ) 6pk cu a) 9 a) a) a) cn a) 6c, uci cn Q a) W C cu m t6 O O O wa) CL IM c.u. C : E 0 c ca 0) C E w (D CU . C C nE CU N 0 wzoum)—C:mo > E 0'— ca O cu 0:� " "-n (D =) cc 0 = (D E _ oto _,z .2 > U) 0 cu -a 76 L) a) 0 0 a C: < 6 �: 2 =) =) IW U) w (D Ll� 0 I-- I 00 0 00 0 co C.0 0 00 O(D co 0 00 0 m CC) 0 OO OO C.0 0 CD C) Cl (.0 co LO C) C) C) CO C\F 17 r-: c3i C) (Dcoo0 OO C) ccoo 00 to 00 C) m I,: G� O 69- O 9 69- 1 9 69- (D ) cu a) a) a) a) cn a) uci ;> Q a) W cn CD cuE (n — C: CL a) (D (D C-) .— 0 Ec Cr 21 c m w (D o6 " "-n (D =) 4-- 0 = VJ > U) 0 N cu o C C: 0 .(D 0 ID cu c as c 0a)oa)==)Oo C: 0 CL C 0 I_ () (D < U) () -- CD 0 CD T CDC) co C\l 41) 0) V. m N " N M CO r - ra 611P 2- 8 11 J O H N c (MO ((D Z O cc L OD a00 rt O O U 0 r iJ' rj' r 69- `- 0) M [I- N O O 64 � 63 69- W N c (MO ((D 0: o OD OD OD It W L iJ' rj' r 69- O 0) M [I- N O O r � LO M 0 (`M M O r 50 ItN1l-'IT NM 0 N r O �- O N O W w (f3 E FR 69 Z W ~ OD c M o00 O Lu M CY) I.o OD LC O QWw o. UJ T iJ' rj' r 69- 61. 0) M [I- N O O o � LO M 0 (`M M O cf d ON O p ItN1l-'IT NM 0 N r O �- O N O � Lq E z T'61> 4t} Ef3 (fl� �} fA EA ig D O cc N co vi Q (0 C r OD Lr U m 6-411 (fl Z W ~ O OND $ M o00 O Lu M CY) I.o W O QWw o. UJ r iJ' rj' r `( r z c o � 03 Q CL cf d ON O p (A M II- N O O OL a $ Lo CM O CO c'M O U � _ = N 'IT Nfl- d'NCV) W � (O N O Q V F O = iJ' rj' r `( It Nil- It N M >QN CL � 00 � 03 Q CL cf d ON O p d1 Q' 0 N r O 6 (f} 613. 61k H3 (fl � Lq E z T'61> OV3aW ig D O � o OL a $ U � _ = N W to M O CONM � Q V F O = C N `( It Nil- It N M >QN CL � 00 � 03 Q CL cf d ON O p d1 Q' 0 N r O 6 (f} 613. 61k H3 (fl LL W E z .9 OV3aW ig D O cc N co vi Q r O' V r a_j J Q T U m W U. V z LL 1 64 69- 61.1� ul6 N r (f} (fl O O O 69- I C) 0 N ►?' M O O O N I cn cn 0 U 7 Q 0 EO O U C- O_ N =U U v a) co C O C 'C o° U r d r cm Q rn o m o c U c 0 C U d N C C N C O d �U E Q V cu 0 O w U O O d O O C d t9' O) :V MR OL a $ U � o W = C N `( N O Z E � 00 � 03 Q CL /ma�y/ W C L" O p d1 Q' 0 N r O z o o ami c U E z .9 Wei ig D O cc N co vi Q r O' V r 1 64 69- 61.1� ul6 N r (f} (fl O O O 69- I C) 0 N ►?' M O O O N I cn cn 0 U 7 Q 0 EO O U C- O_ N =U U v a) co C O C 'C o° U r d r cm Q rn o m o c U c 0 C U d N C C N C O d �U E Q V cu 0 O w U O O d O O C d t9' O) :V MR m C N c c = y= E C E C N O = _ j E V �, /ma�y/ W C L" O .h�-e V 03 Y Q .0 E Q lC a-O�:25m o o ami c U E r r N 'd' (o co i Wei LO0cocO0 m w LO O' V T Q T 1 64 69- 61.1� ul6 N r (f} (fl O O O 69- I C) 0 N ►?' M O O O N I cn cn 0 U 7 Q 0 EO O U C- O_ N =U U v a) co C O C 'C o° U r d r cm Q rn o m o c U c 0 C U d N C C N C O d �U E Q V cu 0 O w U O O d O O C d t9' O) :V MR 19M ITEM NO.: PTIR MEETING D. City 7j-,Z-Ikz:ah AGENDA SUMMARY -- Wei July 1, 2009 SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT REGARDING STATUS OF WATER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS NECESSITATING EMERGENCY RESOLUTION TO EXPEDITE CONSTRUCTION OF GOBBI STREET WATER WELL Background: On March 4, 2009, at a regular meeting of the Ukiah City Council, an emergency resolution was adopted to expedite the construction of a water well at the corner of Gobbi Street and Orchard Avenue. Pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 22050(b)(1), the City Council delegated authority to the City Manager to order action pursuant to subparagraph (a)(1) of that section and directed the City Manager to undertake all steps necessary to have the well constructed without going through a formal competitive bidding process. Pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 22050(b)(3), adoption of this resolution requires the City Manager to report back to the City Council at its next regular meeting setting forth the reasons justifying why the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from the formal competitive solicitation for bids for the well and why the action is necessary to respond to the emergency. Discussion: The reasons for the emergency were set forth in Resolution No.2009-12. These reasons continue to exist: 1) the State of Emergency declared by the Governor of California due to drought conditions, 2) recommendation to municipalities from Victoria Whitney, Deputy Director for Water Rights for the State of California Water Resources Control Board, that drought conditions may necessitate suspension of surface water rights this summer and to secure groundwater sources, and 3) the time required to drill, develop, and construct a temporary connection from a new groundwater well into the City's water distribution system is not sufficient to comply with the noticing requirements of the Public Contracts Code formal bidding process. After completion of the constant rate pump test, water samples were taken from the Gobbi Street Well and sent to Alpha Analytical Laboratories for analysis. All of the detected substances were well below the allowable limits set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California State Department of Public Health. Recommended Action(s): Receive the report. Alternative Council Option(s): Reject recommended action(s) and provide staff with alternate direction. Citizens advised: n/a Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Prepared by: Ann Burck, Deputy Director Public Works - Water & Sewer Division Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: 1. Water Quality Analysis Approved: tChambers, City Manager Three bids were received from Stiles Construction Company, Arnold Construction Company and K.G. Walters Construction Company for construction of the pump house and related equipment and connections. The lowest, responsible bidder was K.G. Walters Construction Company with a bid of $332,517, which was $167,483 less than the Engineer's estimate of $500,000. Construction is scheduled to start July 6, 2009 following approval of submittals for piping, concrete and rebar. Gobbi Street Well Water Quality Analysis - ATTACHMENT (Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc.) (Samples submitted for analysis on June 6, 2009) REGULATED SUBSTANCES SUBSTANCE (UNIT OF MEASURE) MCL Aluminum (ppb) 1,000 Arsenic (ppm) 10 Barium (ppm) 1 Nickel (ppb) 100 Nitrate [as nitrate] (ppm) 45 SECONDARY SUBSTANCES SUBSTANCE (UNIT OF MEASURE) MCL Chloride (ppm) 500 Color (units) 15 Odor -Threshold (TON) 3 Specific Conductance (mS/cm) 1,600 Sulfate (ppm) 500 Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) 1,000 OTHER SUBSTANCES SUBSTANCE (UNIT OF MEASURE) MCL Bicarbonate HCO3 (ppm) NA Calcium (ppm) NA Hardness as CaCO3 (ppm)` NA Magnesium (ppm) NA Sodium (ppm) NA Ground Surface Distribution Gobbi Water Water System 11 NA 43 NA ND 0.0028 NA NA 0.089 0.1 0.065 0.065 ND NA 0.0016 1.3 6.0 6.3 1.9 NA Ground Surface Distribution Gobbi Ground Surface Distribution Gobbi Water Water System 9.1 7.5 4.1 5.7 ND 0.06 <5 <5 ND NA <1 <1 310 286 -190 210 12 NA 10 11 190 173 120 110 Ground Surface Distribution Gobbi Water Water System 140 NA 96 110 29 NA NA 17 147 131 83 79 18 NA 9.5 8.7 16 NA 8.5 14 Definitions MS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter): A unit expressing the amount of eletrical conductivity of a solution MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water NA: Not applicable. ND (Not Detected): Indicates the substance was not found by laboratory analysis. ppm (parts per million): milligrams per liter. ppb (parts per billion): micrograms per liter. ITEM NO.: 7e MEETING DATE: July 1, 2009 SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT REGARDING STATUS OF WATER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS NECESSITATING EMERGENCY RESOLUTION TO EXPEDITE CONSTRUCTION OF OAK MANOR DRIVE WATER WELL Background: On March 4, 2009, at a regular meeting of the Ukiah City Council, an emergency resolution was adopted to expedite the construction of a water well at Oak Manor Drive in Oak Manor Park to the east of the tennis courts. Pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 22050(b)(1), the City Council delegated authority to the City Manager to order action pursuant to subparagraph (a)(1) of that section and directed the City Manager to undertake all steps necessary to have the well constructed without going through a formal competitive bidding process. Pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 22050(b)(3), adoption of this resolution requires the City Manager to report back to the City Council at its next regular meeting setting forth the reasons justifying why the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from the formal competitive solicitation for bids for the well and why the action is necessary to respond to the emergency. Discussion: The reasons for the emergency were set forth in Resolution No.2009-12. These reasons continue to exist: 1) the State of Emergency declared by the Governor of California due to drought conditions, 2) recommendation to municipalities from Victoria Whitney, Deputy Director for Water Rights for the State of California Water Resources Control Board, that drought conditions may necessitate suspension of surface water rights this summer and to secure groundwater sources, 3) the time required to drill, develop, and construct a temporary connection from a new groundwater well into the City's water distribution system is not sufficient to comply with the noticing requirements of the Public Contracts Code formal bidding process, and 4) on May 28, 2009, the State Water Resources Control Board amended Order WR 2009-0027-DWR. The amended Order approved the reduction in minimum instream flow requirements for the upper Russian River. The effective date was changed from July 1, 2009 to July 6, 2009. From July 6 through October 2, 2009, minimum instream flow shall remain at or above 25 cfs, if Lake Mendocino Continued on Paae 2 Recommended Action(s): Receive the report. Alternative Council Option(s): Reject recommended action(s) and provide staff with alternate direction. Citizens advised: n/a Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Prepared by: Ann Burck, Deputy Director Public Works — Water & Sewer Division Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: Approved: C�-- �!� Jae hambers, City Manager storage is less than 65,630 acre feet on July 1, 2009. As of June 23, 2009, the storage level of Lake Mendocino was 57,103 acre feet. At two-thirds reduced flow in the river, it is not known how much, if any, water will be available from the Ranney collector well or Well #3. Zim Industries began drilling the 18 -inch diameter pilot hole on June 3, 2009. The pilot hole is scheduled to be completed on June 27tH. Completion of the pilot hole has taken longer than expected due to loose gravel encountered. The pilot hole had to be stabilized with concrete and gravel before the drilling could be completed. The tentative date to complete all drilling and pump testing is July 20tH ITEM NO.: 9a ii N Af Ra 1 - July 1, 2009 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION AND CONTRACT EXECUTION FOR FUNDING FROM THE GENERAL ALLOCATION OF THE STATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT AGREEMENT,AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS GRANT. SUMMARY: Council is requested to submit an application for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds by July 14, 2009 not to exceed $400,000 for a Public Facilities Project grant for replacement of a roof on the Ukiah Community Center & Food Bank building, a not for profit organization providing food aid to the community and services for the homeless. The existing roof is in very poor condition and leaks during the raining season. It will be replaced using green building design techniques and contain energy efficient and water savings improvements, including photovoltaic panels. The Community Development Commission of Mendocino County (the "CDC") will administer the General Allocation component of the State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for the City of Ukiah. The General Allocation component provides funding for projects in support of housing, public works, community facilities, and public services that principally benefit low-income individuals. CDC has prepared the grant application and will manage all aspects of the grant, if selected for funding. State Citizen Participation regulations require a Design Phase Public Hearing to initiate the annual CDBG funding cycle. This Public Hearing was June 11, 2009. Regulations also require a public hearing Continued on Page 2 Recommended Action(s): 1. Conduct a public hearing to solicit public input on a State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) General Allocation Application. 2. Adopt a Resolution approving submittal of a CDBG Application. 3. Execute a contract for funding from the General Allocation for housing rehabilitation within the City of Ukiah not to exceed $400,000. 4. Authorizing the execution of a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the State of California for the purposes of this grant. Alternative Council Option(s): (1) Decline to proceed, or provide direction Citizens advised: Ukiah Community Center & Food Bank Requested by: Community Development Commission Prepared by: Cathleen Moller, Economic Development Manager Coordinated with: Sage Sangiacomo, Director of Community and General Services and Charley Stump, Planning Director Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. CDBG NOFA Information Approved: Ja hambers, City Manager Page 2 of 2 for approval of application submittal to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). That is the purpose of this public hearing. This year's CDBG Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) was issued April 30, 2009 with applications due by July 14, 2009. This year's NOFA has a maximum of $800,000 available per jurisdiction, with the opportunity of doing one of the following: up to a maximum of $400,000 for one program; up to a maximum of $600,000 for a housing combination program, including housing rehabilitation and homeownership assistance; up to a maximum of $800,000 for two programs, one of which is a housing program and one a public service program; up to a maximum of $800,000 for up to two eligible projects; or up to a maximum of $800,000 for a combination of one program and one project. Although city staff capacity for administering grants is very limited, city staff can recommend that this grant application be considered because the CDC is willing and able to administer all aspects of the grant. The City's obligation will be limited to financial transactions receiving and dispersing draw -downs and there is no on-going monitoring of the project after completion. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 09/10 F-1NewAppropriation ® Not Applicable ❑ Budget Amendment Required ATTACHMENT / RESOLUTION NO. 2009 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF UKIAH COUNCIL APPROVING AN APPLICATION AND CONTRACT EXECUTION FOR FUNDING FROM THE GENERAL ALLOCATION OF THE STATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS GRANT. WHEREAS: 1. A Public Hearing was held pursuant to federal Citizen Participation requirements before the City Council on July 1, 2009, to receive public comment and consider an eligible application for a City of Ukiah Public Facilities Project grant 2. The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves an application for up to: Public Facilities Project: Ukiah Community Center & Food Bank $340,400 Activity Delivery $ 29,600 General Administration $ 30,000 Total $400,000 3. The City has determined that federal Citizen Participation requirements were met during the development of this application. 4. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to act on the City's behalf in all matters pertaining to this application. 5. If the application is approved, the City Manager or designee is authorized to enter into and sign the grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the State of California for the purposes of this grant. 6. The Executive Director or designee of the Community Development Commission of Mendocino County is hereby authorized and directed to act on the City's behalf in all matters pertaining to this application. Passed and adopted by the City of Ukiah City Council on July 1, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Philip E. Baldwin, Mayor ATTEST: Linda C. Brown, City Clerk State of California Community Development Block Grant Program Allocation Years: Allocation Type: 2009-10 General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonias Alloc'ation April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1101109-119101"o 1. Available Funding Z Authorizing Legislation and Regulations 3. Changes for this Year 4. Application Timelines 5. Application Workshops FUNDING GUIDELINES 6. Funding Limits 7. Eligible Applicants 8. Eligible Activities 9. Meeting a National Objective 10. Program Administrative Costs APPLICATION REVIEW AND SCORING 11.- Evaluation Criteria and Scoring Points AWARD ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PROCESSING 12. Award Announcements 13. Award Processing and Term of Agreement 14. Grant Management Workshops p ATTACHMENT 2 -- Page Number 1 2 2 3 4 10-12 14 14 15 CDBG PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 15. State and Federal Requirements 16. Public Hearings 17. Public Records Act 18. Procurement 19. Federal Debarment and Suspension APPENDICES See Page 20 for Index Notice of Funding Availability 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation The Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) announces the availability of the following State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funds: 1. Up to approximately $15 million for the 2009-10 General Allocation contingent upon the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) allocation to the Department. 2. Up to approximately $4 million for the 2008-09 and 2009-10 Colon ias Allocation contingent upon HUD's allocation to the Department. This Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) applies to the CDBG General and Colonias Allocations. Typical activities funded under these allocations include: housing rehabilitation programs and projects; homeownership assistance programs; housing acquisition projects; housing new construction projects; public improvements projects; public facility projects; and public services programs. NOTE: The Department reserves the right, at its sale discretion, to suspend or amend the provisions of this NOFA. If such action occurs, the Department will notify all interested parties. The Application is a separate document. An Application can be obtained by doing any of the following: ➢ Fax or mail the Request for Application form (included at the end of this NOFA) to the CDBG Program Secretary. Use of the form is encouraged to assure accuracy of mailing information. > Download the document from the CDBG website: www.hcd.ca.gov/fa/cdb.q/funds > Attend any of the scheduled Application Workshops (see cover memorandum). Please note that CDBG recommends submitting the Application Workshop RSVP form to ensure adequate seating is available. � Contact the CDBG Program Administrative Assistant at (916) 552-9398, Please note that there are separate funding notices for the Economic Development, and Planning/Technical Assistance Allocations. Interested individuals may contact the Program Administrative Assistant at (916) 552-9398 for information about those particular NOFAs. Notice of Funding Availability 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation 2. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS The CDBG Program is authorized by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCDA) as amendedand Subpart 1 of the Federal Community Development Block Grant regulati�nS2 . The requirements of the State CDBG Program are in Health and Safety Code, Section 50825, and Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 7050, et seq. 3. CHANGES FOR THIS YEAR The 2009-10 funding cycle and application process will be significantly different from the previous funding rounds. Changes are highlighted below. For more detailed information on these changes, applicants may contact a CDBG program representative (see Appendix A) and/or attend an Application Workshop that will be conducted in several locations around the state in April 2009. Program Changes: • For this NOFA, the maximum amount awarded per application will be decreased to $800,000 for the General Allocation.- ® Each application will be limited to one of the following scenarios: ✓ Up to a maximum of $400,000 for one of the following programs: housing rehabilitation, OR public services, OR homeownership assistance. V Up to a maximum of $600,000 for a housing combination program consisting of a housing rehabilitation program AND a homeownership assistance program. This option allows grantees to transfer funds easily between the two activities as needed with written approval from the Department. v/ Up to a maximum of $800,000 for two programs, of which one is a housing program (housing rehabilitation OR homeownership assistance), AND the other one is a public service program (up to five public service activities), each program with a limit of up to $400,000. Up to a maximum of $800,000 for up to two eligible projects (public improvements, public improvements in support of housing new construction, public facilities, multi -family rehabilitation, real property acquisition and housing new construction). ✓ Up to a maximum of $800,000 for a combination of one eligible program (up to $400,000) AND one eligible project, or a combination of the housing combo (up to $600,000) AND one eligible project, Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended. 42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq., Federal Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-35). Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 570, Subpart 1. 4 Notice of Funding Availability 9 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation The 10 percent set-aside 3 is limited to only ONE activity per application. This activity will not be rated and ranked. However, the application must include all documents related to the type of activity proposed, Notes: • Any awarded programs/projects that do not clear special conditions within 90 days of the contract execution date may be terminated/disencumbered. • The former First -Time Homebuyer Program is now called "Homeownership Assistance" Program to reconcile with HUD's terminology. ® An application can receive a maximum of 1,000 points. ���IITIIANV_l a. Key dates: NOFA and Application release: April 30, 2009 Application Workshops: May 8 -June 5, 2009 Applications due to HCD by 5 p.m.: July 14, 2009 HCD Compliance of Housing Element: June 26, 2009 Awards Announced October 2009 b. Application Deadline: July 14, 2009. Applications must be received in the Department by 5 p.m. on the due date. Applications that are received after the due date will be returned even if mailed before the due date with a postmark on or prior to the deadline date. c. Number of copies: > One complete original set (with all original signatures and originallcertified authorizing resolutions); and > One complete copy of the entire application (including attachments); and > Include one additional copy of the authorizing resolutions in the front pocket of the original application binder. d. Mail or Deliver to: Department of Housing and Community Development Division of Financial Assistance Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program 1800 Third Street, Room 330 Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 552-9398 March 8, 2000, Management Memorandum. 3 Notice of Funding Availability e. For further information: 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation Please contact a CDBG Representative or the CDBG Administrative Assistant at (916) 552-9398. Please refer to Appendix A for the name and telephone number of the CDBG Representative assigned -to each eligible jurisdiction, The Department will present a one -day application workshop in several locations (to be determined) around the State. The workshops will include a brief overview of the State Program, a discussion of the application evaluation criteria for eligible activities and general information regarding the major federal overlay requirements that may affect funded activities. Eligible applicants attending a workshop are encouraged to review this NOFA prior to attending. Applicants should come prepared with a list of relevant questions regarding their project and proposed application. Information about the workshop dates, times, and locations will be made available soon. Note: Applicants that anticipate attending one of the scheduled workshops are encouraged to send an Application Workshop RSVP form (see cover memorandum) to the CDBG Program. This will help ensure that adequate seating is available for all participants. 0 Notice of Funding Availability FUNDING GUIDELINES a. Maximum award limits. 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation • Maximum total award limit will be $800,000. • Up to a maximum of $400,000 for one of the following programs: housing rehabilitation, OR public services, OR homeownership assistance. • Up to a maximum of $600,000 for a housing combination program consisting of a housing rehabilitation program AND a homeownership assistance program. This option allows grantees to transfer funds easily between the two activities as needed with written approval from the Department. • Up to a maximum of $800,000 for two programs, of which one is a housing program (housing rehabilitation OR homeownership assistance), AND the other one is a public service program (up to five public service activities), each program with a limit of up to $400,000. • Up to a maximum of $800,000 for up to two eligible projects (public improvements, public improvements in support of housing new construction, public facilities, multi -family rehabilitation, real property acquisition and housing new construction). • Up to a maximum of $800,000 for a combination of one eligible program (up to $400,000) AND one eligible project, or a combination of the housing combo (up to $600,000) AND one eligible project. b. Limited number of awards. Applications for funding will be competitively rated and ranked. Funding will be awarded to applicants that score the highest overall, until the available funding is exhausted. Consistent with the nature of a competitive application process, there is no assurance that all applications will be funded. HOLD-OUT THRESHOLD FACTOR: In order to -be eligible to submit a application for funding, an applicant shall have resolved any audit findings or performance problems for prior State CDBG grants award under this program. I Jurisdictions are not eligible to receive CDBG funds if they have received a performance findings letter. Examples of performance findings are, but not limited to, having excessive program income on hand, not submitting required reports as stated in the grant agreement, and having unresolved audit findings. If the applicant has received such a letter or is unsure of its status, the applicant should contact the CDBG Representative (see Appendix A). 5 Notice of Funding Availability 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation The city/county is eligible to apply if it has received a letter from the Department clearing its holdout status prior to submittal of the application. The Department may waive this requirement when such problems or findings result in no obligation to return funds to the Department, arrangements satisfactory to the Department have been made for repayment or performance, or a formal action to resolve the matter has been taken. General Allocation -- Eligible Cities and Counties In general, incorporated cities under 50,000 in population and -counties with an unincorporated area population of under 200,000 persons are eligible to participate in the State CDBG Program. Eligible cities and counties may apply for funds under each Program component. The following exceptions apply: a. If a city under 50,000 in population has entered into a three-year urban county Cooperation Agreement, that city cannot participate in the State CDBG Program until the expiration of the Agreement. b. If a city under 50,000 in population has been declared the central city of a Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, it cannot participate because it is entitled to receive CDBG funds directly from the HUD. C. If a jurisdiction is presently debarred, proposed for debarment, suspended, or declared ineligible pursuant to Title 24 CFR, Part 24, the jurisdiction cannot participate in the CDBG Program. See Appendix A for a listing of the eligible cities and counties for the General Allocation. This Appendix also provides the poverty index for each jurisdiction. Colonias Allocation -- Eligible Applicants All cities and counties eligible under the State CDBG (non -entitlement) Program, which contain Colonias as defined by the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, are eligible applicants for these funds. For the purpoges of this legislation, a "colonia" is any identifiable community that: 1. is located within 150 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico, except within any standard metropolitan statistical area that has a population exceeding 1,000,000; and 2. is designated by the State or county in which it is located as colonia; and 3. is determined to be a colonia on the basis of objective criteria, including the lack of potable water supply, lack of adequate sewage systems, and lack of decent, safe, and sanitary housing; and 4. was in existence and generally recognized as a colonia before the enactment of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. The availability of Colonias Allocation funds pursuant to this NOFA is limited to eligible jurisdictions that propose activities within designated Colonias. Eligible jurisdictions may apply for these funds in addition to any other CDBG application submitted during a given program year without invoking the program funding caps. EV Notice of Funding Availability All 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation See Appendix B for a listing of the eligible cities and counties for the Colonias Allocation. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES Pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCDA Section 105(a)), CDBG funds may be used for the following activities: Housing Related: • Housing Rehabilitation • Homeownership Assistance • Combination of Housing Rehabilitation & Homeownership Assistance Public Services Related: • Child care • Health care ® Crime prevention ® Job training • Recreation programs • Education programs • Fair housing counseling • Credit counseling services ® Public safety services • Services for senior citizens ® Services for homeless persons ® Drug and alcohol abuse counseling and testing • Transportation services - • Nutrition services ® Energy conservation counseling and testing • Emergency assistance payments , Proiects • Public Facilities ® Rehabilitation of Multi -Family Projects • Public Improvements • Public Improvements in Support of Housing New Construction ® Housing New Construction (Very Limited) • Real Property Acquisition Please refer to Appendix C for information about these major activity categories. FA Notice of Funding Availability 2009-10 CDBG General Allocation 2008-09 & 2009-10 Colonia Allocation 9. MEETING A NATIONAL OBJECTIVE According to 24 CFR Section 570.483, in order to be eligible for funding, every CDBG-funded activity must meet one of the three national objectives of the program. The national objectives are: ® Benefiting low- and moderate -income persons; or ® Preventing or eliminating slums or blight; or ® Meeting other community development needs having a particular urgency because of existing conditions that pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. Note: Most activities funded under the CDBG General Allocation will meet the national objective of benefiting low- and moderate -income (LMI) persons. a. General Administrative Expenses. Grantees are allowed up to 7.5 percent of the total grant amount for reasonable general administrative expenses related to carrying out the CDBG Program. General administrative costs include staff and related costs required for overall program management, coordination, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation. b. Activity Delivery Expenses. A portion of the grant award may be used to pay for the actual costs associated with the delivery of the proposed activity. Activity delivery includes costs associated with staff and overhead directly involved with carrying out the activity. Activity delivery costs vary, depending on the activity category. As a general guideline, the cost of activity delivery has been: * Housing Rehabilitation: up to 19 percent • Public facilities or public improvements up to 8 percent (if complex labor standards are justlfled*) up to 12 percent ® All other activities: up to S percent * Complex labor standards means multiple subcontractors and/or numerous trades. Note: Activity delivery costs are calculated as a percentage of the total activity amount. Example: For a $300,000 Homeownership Assistance Program with activity delivery costs of 8 percent, activity delivery would be calculated as follows: $300,000 x 0.08 = $24,000 (activity delivery) E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Of Mendocino Couunfy Main Office: 9076 North State St., Ukiah, CA 95482 707/463-5462 To: City of Ukiah City Council FAX: 707/463-4188 MP:707/463-5697 From: Community Development Commission of Mendocino County/Craig Schlatter, Community Development Manager Subject: 2009 State CDBG NOFA and Application Date: June 24, 2009 The Community Development Commission of Mendocino County (the "CDC") administers the General Allocation component of the State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for the City of Ukiah. The General Allocation component provides funding for projects in support of housing, public works, community facilities, and public services that principally benefit low-income individuals. State Citizen Participation regulations require a Design Phase Public Hearing to initiate the annual CDBG funding cycle. This Public Hearing was held June 11, 2009. Regulations also require a public hearing for approval of application submittal to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). That is the purpose of this public hearing. This year's CDBG NOFA was issued on April 30, 2009 with applications due by July 14, 2009. This year's NOFA has a maximum of $800,000 available per jurisdiction, with the opportunity of doing one of the following: up to a maximum of $400,000 for one -program; up to a maximum of $600,000 for a housing combination program- housing rehabilitation and homeownership assistance; up to a maximum of $800,000 for two programs, one of which is a housing program and one a public service program; up to a maximum of $800,000 for up to two eligible projects; or up to a maximum of $800,000 for a combination of one program and one project. In response to the 2009 CDBG NOFA, the CDC and City were notified of interest from the Ukiah Community Center (UCC) and Food Bank in an application for CDBG funds. During the design phase public hearing, UCC and Food Bank staff were present and described the need for CDBG funding to rehabilitate their roof. Three connected buildings comprise the UCC/Food Bank public facility. There is extensive roof leaking throughout the facility, to the point where it has become a health and safety issue for staff and the clients they serve. UCC/Food Bank attempted to patch the roof in both 2007 and 2008, but did not have adequate funding to complete the necessary repairs. In winter E�UAI HOUSIHR 2008, the Food Bank was forced to close due to flooding caused by leaking throughout the facility. What is proposed by the UCC/Food Bank is to rehabilitate or replace the current roof and repair related structural deficiencies caused by the long-term excessive leaking. UCC/Food Bank also proposes adding photovoltaic panels and a rainwater harvest system, to improve the energy efficiency and water saving features of the facility. Improving the energy efficiency and water saving features is expected to save the agency at least $10,000 each year. The following is requested: Public Facilities Project — Ukiah Community Center & Food Bank $340,400 Activity Delivery $ 29,600 General Administration $ 30,000 Total $400,000 UCC/Food Bank is a non-profit 501(c) 3 organization serving low income and no -income clients in homeless services, food bank, and immediate and emergency needs. The Food Bank assists an average of 3,000 people each month while UCC, through its Day Shelter/Resource Center, reports assisting over 1,000 individuals monthly. ,vi 1:4 July 1, 2009 SUBJECT: APPROVE DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLAN Background: This project is funded in the FY 2008-2009 budget adopted by the City Council, Discussion: A second public workshop was held on May 12, 2009. Based on input provided at that workshop, RRM Design Group completed the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan. Keith Gurnee of RRM Design Group will be in attendance to make a presentation on the plan. Staff recommends that council approve the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted FY 08/09 New Appropriation Not Applicable F� Budget Amendment Required Amount Budgeted Source of Funds (title and #) Account Number Addtl. Appropriation Requested Recommended Action(s): Approve Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan. Alternative Council Option(s): Provide comments and direction to staff. Citizens advised: Phil Dow, Mendocino Council of Governments Requested by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Prepared by: Rick Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: 1. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Approved- it pproved:J n Chambers, City Manager 1) INTRODUCTION 2 A) Purpose B) Existing Conditions 2 2 II) STAKEHOLDER AND INTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETINGS 2s A) Key Stakeholder Interviews 2 B) Internal Review Committee Meetings 3 C) Opportunities and Constraints 3 111) PUBLIC OUTREACH 4 A) Public Workshop #1 B) Public Workshop #2 4 6 IV) DRAFT STREETSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN ELEMENTS 7 V) FINAL DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELEMENTS 9; VI) INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS 29 A) Existing Condition Constraints B) Cost Estimate for Implementation of the Plan VII) IMPLEMENTATION 31 A) Strategies for Implementation 31 B) Funding the Downtown Improvement Plan Program 33 APPENDICES A- Opportunities and Constraints Map B- Workshop Results Summaries C- Traffic Analysis Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 2 1) INTRODUCTION A) Purpose The Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan is Phase 3 of the City of Ukiah's efforts to resolve traffic, circulation, and urban design issues associated with its downtown area. The purpose of this plan is to upgrade State Street and Main Street from Norton Street to Gobbi Street to provide for a cohesive, pedestrian -friendly, attractive, and complete downtown core. This Final Report summarizes the process leading up to the formation of the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan ("the Plan") and incorporates the results of the existing conditions analyses, stakeholder interviews, Internal Review Committee (IRC) meetings, public workshops, and traffic analyses. The report also describes the changes that have occurred since the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan ("the Draft Plan"). B) Existing Conditions 1) Context and Location The City of Ukiah is located in southern Mendocino County, 60 miles from the Mendocino Coast. Situated on the Highway 101 corridor, Ukiah serves as the city center for Mendocino County and neighboring areas. As two primary north/south carriers in the heart of Ukiah, State and Main Streets stretch along eight blocks of Downtown Ukiah. One block west of State Street is School Street, the primary downtown corridor and the biggest attractor of pedestrian foot traffic. 2) Street Character State Street carries heavier traffic than Main Street and contains several distinctive and historic buildings with strong relationships to the street. Main Street, in contrast, provides access to rear -of -business parking areas and a number of vintage craftsman style residences and buildings. Common challenges to both corridors include the lack of pedestrian -friendly, visitor -attracting amenities such as street trees, street furniture, gateway features, and consistent sidewalks; a large number of curb cuts/driveways and overhead utility lines; and heavier and faster traffic in relation to other streets in the downtown. 11) STAKEHOLDER AND INTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETINGS A) Key Stakeholder Interviews RRM Design Group conducted stakeholder interviews on June 13, 2008 at the Ukiah Conference Center. There were 20 participants including: former Mayor Crane, Planning Commissioners, City Council members, commercial developers, Ukiah citizens, property owners, business owners, and representatives from the Chamber of Commerce, Grace Hudson Museum, the Ukiah Main Street, MTA, and Employers Council. The purpose of the interviews was to gather issues and ideas to consider during preparation of the new streetscape designs and traffic study. Many participants said they would like the State Street and Main Street streetscape to tie in with School Street since School Street is also a part of the downtown. The following is a summary of the most frequently noted comments: ® State Street is a barrier from east to west ® Beautify the walkways Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 3 • Underground utilities are a challenge • Showcase history of Ukiah in the streetscape • Move courthouse • Provide more shade • Slow down traffic on State Street • Introduce diagonal parking on State Street • Provide more shade in the plaza, shelter, better businesses adjacent • Create more walkability, safer crossings, and connectivity between east and west on Main Street • Improve aesthetic appearance on Main Street • Create a visual connection from City Hall to Grace Hudson Museum B) Internal Review Committee Meetings In addition to obtaining feedback from key stakeholders, RRM recommended the formation of an Internal Review Committee (IRC) that would meet on an as needed basis to review and provide timely direction on all work products associated with the project. The IRC comprised of Richard Seanor, Deputy Director of Public Works; Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Charles Stump, Director of Planning and Community Development Department; and Sage Sangiacomo, Director of Community Services. The first IRC meeting was held on July 17, 2008, and the Committee discussed future road functions, streetscape improvements, results from the first workshop, alternative streetscape plans, and next steps. The group formulated strategies for improving the circulation along State Street, including preparing a new circulation study, meeting with the Mayor, and preparing a Project Status Report to the City Council. The IRC also revisited diagonal parking and turn pocket options and brainstormed strategies for public outreach. Lastly, the group reviewed and provided feedback on the alternatives table. The second IRC meeting was held on May 26, 2009, and the Committee reviewed the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan, the results of Workshop #2, and the Draft Report. The Committee's comments helped inform the the Plan. C) Opportunities and Constraints Making use of the data gathered and the feedback collected from the key stakeholder interviews, RRM prepared a map depicting all known opportunities and constraints along the State Street and Main Street corridors. See Appendix A for the Opportunities and Constraints Map. The following is a summary of the opportunities and constraints identified: • Numerous existing parking lots along Main Street • Inconsistent street trees • Existing and insufficient/inconsistent landscaping • Existing traffic lights • Existing dirt path in front of the Grace Hudson Museum • Existing east -west one-way streets Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 4 ® Potential road connections from the Grace Hudson Museum to City Hall on Seminary Avenue as well as along Stephenson Street (Stephenson Street is disconnected at Alex R. Thomas Plaza) ® Potential pedestrian street on Church Street between State Street and School Street ® Gateway opportunities at the intersections of Gobbi Street and State Street, Gobbi Street and Main Street, Norton Street and State Street, and Norton Street and Main Street ® Potential landscape improvement at Alex R. Thomas Plaza ® Potential sidewalk improvements on Mill Street between State Street and Main Street, and on Main Street between Mill Street and Seminary Avenue ® Decorative paving opportunities at the intersections of Gobbi Street and State Street, Perkins Street and State Street, and Norton Street and State Street ® Potential bridge element where Gibson Creek crosses under State Street ® Possible street extensions where Stephenson Street and Church Street meet Main Street ® Traffic control opportunities at the intersections of Gobbi Street and Main Street, and Perkins Street and Main Street 111) PUBLIC OUTREACH RRM organized two workshops as forums for members of the public to ask questions, share ideas, and react to the plan concepts. The complete Workshop Results Summaries are included in Appendix B. A) Public Workshop #1 On Thursday, July 11, 2008, the first public workshop was held in the Cabernet Room at the Ukiah Valley Conference Center. The purpose of this initial workshop was to obtain input on the issues and ideas that would need to be addressed in developing a streetscape improvement plan for the Downtown, to have workshop participants prioritize those ideas that were most and least important, and to then conduct a design brainstorming session. Attendance at the workshop was unfortunately very low at only 10 people. 1) Issue Identification and Priority Setting Results The following summarizes the outcome of the Issue Identification and Priority Setting exercise: Strong Support o Bulb -outs to shorten crossings o Provide more shade, more trees throughout o Improve pedestrian crossings on State Street, reduce crossing distance, include bulb - outs o Beautification on State Street o Wider sidewalks with street trees, space for outdoor cafe (seating on sidewalk) on State Street o Vintage lights reflecting late 1800's o Upgrade parking lot lands & paving o Enhance Bridge at Gibson Creek on State Street Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 5 Support o Slow traffic on State Street, provide traffic calming o Introduce sidewalks where there are none o More street trees on State Street o Soften edges of buildings at walkway on State Street o Street -level landscaping o Replenish creeks o Incorporate seating into green areas and with trees o Good lighting at crosswalks o Cohesive signage o Underground utilities on Main Street o Public art o Better landscape and development of private parking on Main Street Neutral Issues o "History Walk" o Bioswale strips as way to reduce pavement o One-way couplet on State Street and Main Street o Traffic calming on Main Street ' o Roundabout at Perkins Street and Orchard Street Opposition o Reduce straight -in parking o Traffic control at Smith Street & State Street o Diagonal parking on State Street o Reduce State Street to 2 lanes o Stormwater cells Issues that were more controversial at the workshop included using bioswale strips as way to reduce pavement, creating one-way couplet on State Street and Main Street, adding traffic calming on Main Street, constructing a roundabout at Perkins Street and Orchard Avenue, and forming a gateway at Highway 101 and Perkins Street. After consulting with W -Trans and the City, RRM determined that it would be infeasible to create a couplet on State Street and Main Street as it would require the reconfiguration of adjacent perpendicular streets and larger alterations to the Downtown that were out of the scope of this plan. 2) Design Charrette Results As part of the design brainstorming exercise, one group looked at all of Downtown Ukiah, identifying opportunities and constraints including current hazard areas and need for landscaping, sidewalks, bulb -outs, one-way streets, and a gateway. The other group decided to focus on the "core area" of Downtown, defined as the sections of State Street and Main Street between Clay Street and Henry Street. The group added benches/seating, street lighting, sidewalks, bulb -outs, trees, a decorative crosswalk, a roundabout, a bridge element, and an opened creek. From the drawings, it was apparent that the safety and comfort of pedestrians was an important issue. The beautification of State Street and Main Street mainly by means of additional trees, landscaping, and gateway elements was also a common theme. In general, the focus was on creating a distinct, pedestrian -friendly Downtown. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 6 3) General Conclusions The following findings and conclusions were derived from this first workshop: o There was overwhelming support for improving the walkability, landscaping, and general aesthetics of the Downtown streetscape to reflect Ukiah's historical character. However, participants were split on whether changes to the existing traffic system were necessary to achieve these goals. o With respect to parking, attendees at the workshop did not give much attention to the issue, in contrast to the key stakeholder interviews in which parking was a main concern. Participants were split on the issue of parking, generally supporting existing parallel parking over diagonal parking. o There was generally support for some type of vegetated landscape treatment along the streets, though exactly what these might look like was undecided. o There appeared to be consensus for restoring the creek or adding some type of creek element, with emphasis on a bridge element. o There was strong support for increasing the vitality of the Downtown streetscapes by encouraging more uses on the sidewalks such as outdoor restaurant seating. B) Public Workshop #2 On Tuesday, May 12, 2009, the second public workshop was held in the Cabernet 2 Room at the Ukiah Valley Conference Center. The purpose of this workshop was to review the traffic and circulation improvements recommended by W -Trans, present the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan, and obtain feedback on the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan through a "Report Card" exercise. Twenty-eight (28) people attended the workshop. 1) Report Card Exercise RRM distributed "Report Cards" to the workshop attendees which asked a series of questions to obtain feedback on the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan. The results of the Report Card exercise indicated that for each of the street section locations, the majority of participants preferred the proposed configuration over the existing street configuration (see Street Sections on page 13 of this document). Also, participants were asked whether they "Support Strongly," Support Moderately," or "Oppose" specific features of the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan. Out of these three options, the "Support Strongly" choice was the most common choice for each of the features listed. 2) General Conclusions The workshop attendees generally supported most elements of the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan. The most controversial new features were: the diagonal parking on State Street; the 1 -way to 2 -way street conversions on Standley Street, Smith Street, and Henry Street; and the traffic signals at Gobbi Street and Main Street and Perkins Street and Main Street. Many comments emphasized the need for more planted medians and pedestrian refuge islands on State Street, especially in front of the Palace Hotel, between Gobbi Street and Seminary Avenue, and at the south side of the Church Street intersection. The general consensus was that medians were preferable to diagonal parking if there was room for only one of these options. Many participants were also interested in installing roundabouts at Gobbi Street and State Street and Gobbi Street and State Street, if the City could explore property acquisitions to create ample right-of- way. Additional elements that were frequently mentioned among participants included: Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 7 o Street furniture that follows existing trends and compliments Ukiah's historic character 0 30 degree instead of 45 degree diagonal parking on State Street to reduce probability of traffic conflicts o Crosswalk paving of a material other than brick (e.g. granite) o Underground utilities on Main Street o Consideration of loading zones and garbage pick-ups for businesses o Consistency with earlier plans, including the City's form -based zoning o A one -block pedestrian mall (e.g. on Perkins Street or Church Street between School Street and State Street) o Larger trees that will shade the sidewalk not conflict with existing aesthetics, signage, and infrastructure o Gobbi Street and Norton Street gateway treatments o Bicycle amenities, including bicycle lanes, sharrows, and racks o Widened sidewalks on Perkins Street between State Street and School Street with no parking on the north side and diagonal parking on the south side o Widened sidewalks surrounding the Courthouse IV) DRAFT STREETSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN ELEMENTS The following summarizes the elements of the Draft Streetscape Concept Plan which was prepared for Workshop #2. The Draft Plan was devised based on the results of a traffic study conducted by W -Trans which examined existing and future traffic operation under current geometrics as well as with several streetscape options for State Street and Main Street. The results of the traffic study are presented in the document titled Traffic Analysis for Downtown. The Draft Plan has since been revised, as discussed in the next section (Section V, Final Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan). A) Traffic Circulation 1) Lane Reconfigurations "Road diets" on State Street would reduce the current two through lanes in each direction to a single travel lane in each direction with a two-way left -turn lane that would operate as a left -turn lane at appropriate intersections. Parallel parking would be maintained on both sides of the street. This lane configuration would allow flexibility for widened sidewalks or buffer zones on State Street between the travel lanes and parking. Main Street would continue to have a single travel lane in each direction with parallel parking, but travel lanes would be reduced to 10 feet wide to accommodate 5 -foot Class II bicycle lanes in each direction. 2) Signals The traffic analysis proposed installing new traffic signals at the Gobbi Street and Main Street and Perkins Street and Main Street intersections. The existing traffic signal controllers at the Standley Street and State Street and Perkins Street and State Street intersections would be reprogrammed to improve traffic movement. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 8 3) Side Streets To increase traffic circulation, Henry Street west of State Street, and Smith Street and Standley Street both west and east of State Street would be converted from one-way streets to two-way. B) Diagonal Parking Diagonal parking on the west side of State Street for the block between Stephenson Street and Clay Street (adjacent to the Alex R. Thomas Plaza) would take the place of existing parallel parking. The east side of State Street would have no parking. The diagonal parking would promote usage of the plaza by providing easier access, increased parking, and a wide buffer from traffic. Diagonal parking would also be added on the east side of State Street between Henry Street and the proposed gateway element at Gibson Creek to signify the entrance into the downtown area and to provide additional parking and easy access to nearby businesses. C) Bicycle Lanes Main Street would contain Class II Bicycle Lanes in both directions between Clay Street and Norton Street. On State Street, a buffer zone between parking lane and the travel lane would provide some space for bicyclists to ride outside of the flow of traffic, though this buffer would not be wide enough to accommodate a dedicated bicycle lane. The traffic analysis recommended that State Street within the downtown corridor between Gobbi Street and Norton Street be identified as a Class III Bicycle Route. D) Bulb -outs and Mid -Block Extensions All of the intersections on State Street within the project area would be retrofitted with bulb -outs except at Mill Street, Scott Street, Gobbi Street, and Norton Street to preserve right turn movements. Bulb -outs would reduce street crossing distances for pedestrians, slow down traffic, and provide additional space for sidewalk improvements. In addition, mid -block extensions where Seminary Avenue, Stephenson Street, and Henry Street dead-end at State Street would serve a similar purpose as bulb -outs and create focal points at the dead -ends. E) Intersection Treatments and Gateways The Draft Plan suggests enhancing the existing paving treatment at Perkins Street and State Street, one of the busiest intersections on State Street. These intersection treatments would help denote the significance of the intersections through Downtown. The intersection at Seminary Avenue and State Street would have a similar paving treatment to highlight its connection to the City Hall. The northern entrance into the downtown on State Street would be marked by a "bridge" gateway element where Gibson Creek currently crosses under State Street. The gateway would include a paved pedestrian crossing, potential flashers (flashing inground lights warning oncoming motorists of crossing pedestrians), bollards or street lights, and a mid - block sidewalk extension to narrow the crossing distance. F) Median Between Smith Street and Henry Street, a new raised median would add greenery and trees to the center of the streetscape. RRM and W -Trans examined the possibility of adding additional center medians on State Street, but turning movements and the large number of curb cuts/driveways along State Street would make this difficult. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report ,June 23, 2009 Page 9 G) Sidewalks In general, State Street would have widened sidewalks that would accommodate new planters, trees, street furniture, outdoor restaurant/cafe seating opportunities, and other street beautification and pedestrian amenities. Sidewalks would range between 8 to 15.5 feet in width depending on the existing right-of-way. Main Street sidewalks would be filled in wherever gaps currently occur to give continuity to the streetscape. A new sidewalk would replace the dirt path fronting the Grace Hudson Museum while retaining the existing granite curb to preserve the path's historic character. H) Trees New trees on both State Street and Main Street would provide additional landscaping where existing trees are not present to create a continuous canopy within the downtown. Additional trees would be added to the Alex R. Thomas Plaza and to the sidewalk on the State Street side of the plaza to provide much-needed shade to the space. Accent trees at sidewalk corners would signify gateways at the Gibson Creek crossing and at the Perkins Street and State Street and Seminary Avenue and State Street intersections. 1) Crosswalks Brick or enhanced paving at all crosswalks within the project area would give the crossings more prominence and increase pedestrian safety. Also, the Draft Plan proposes new crosswalks at the northern and eastern sides of the Cleveland Lane and Main Street intersection. J) Street Furniture Street furniture all along State Street and Main Street such as benches, trash receptacles, bollards, lights, etc. would improve the pedestrian experience of the downtown. The street furniture would have a cohesive style that would reflect Ukiah's historic character. V) FINAL DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELEMENTS After compiling the comments and suggestions from Workshop #2 and the second IRC meeting, RRM completed the Final Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan (referred hereafter as the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan). In general, the Plan retains the majority of the Draft Plan elements, with only minor alterations. The overall approach to traffic circulation and streetscape design remain the same. Please refer to the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan map and corresponding street sections on the following pages. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 10 Back of Page 9 Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 12 Back of Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Map M n' e' to' to' to' 10' 6' irT Sitlewalk Parkin0 Travel Lane Traval Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Parking Sidewalk 56' 78' ROW State Street - South of Clay —, a m 0� 11' 8' 10' 10' 10' 10' --.8. 11, Sidewalk Perking Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Parking I Sidewalk 58' 78'ROW State Street - North of Clay n 14,2 Q aim.'-, a & 12' 1 8' 11' ii' 11' 11' B t2 Sideweik Parking Travel Lana Tra I Lane i Traval Lena � Traval Lanc Perk'nq � Sidewalk 60' _ State Street - South of Perkins �f - la f 12' 8' ( 11' 1 11' 1 1/' 11' it 12 Sidewalk Parking Travel L.. Travel Lane Travel Leve I Travel Lane Parking Sidewalk 80' 84' ROW State Street - North of Perkins State Street - South of Clay State Street North of Clay State Street - South of Perkins State Street - North of Perkins Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 14 Back of Street Sections- Page I I - - - - 8' 8' 12' 1 12' 12' 12' 8' 1 8' Sidewalk Parking Travel Lane Traval Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Parking Sitlewalk 64' 80' ROW State Street - North of Smith a.., 0--m I s• a' 12' 1z'tz' az s' 10' Sidewalk Parking Travel Lana Travel Lane �J, avel Lane I Travel Lane J) Parking Sidewalk 82ROW State Street , North of Henry 44 approx. I approx. g.g' 8' 72' 12' 8' 6'-8' Sidewalk ? Parking Travel Lane Travel Lane Parking Sidewalk aa' ROW varies Main Street - South of Clay (Facing South) 0 a8�8 x. 11' 12' 12' 71' approx Sidewalk ParkinglsaouldeJ Trevel lana Travel Larre JParkinglSnoumer�Sidewalk_I i]LTFQ� State Street - North of Smith State Street - North of Henry IN] B' T 13' 1 13' ' 7' 1 8' Sidewalk Parking Travel Lane" I Travel Lane' I Parking idewal Aw: ____�k,we m vsm 4 56' ROW Main Street - South of Clay (Facing South) "sharrows - shared lane marking for bicycles Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 16 Back of Street Sections- Page 2 1 _ l �g C 10 T10' 8 Parkmg� Ianel__� Lane (Parking ,� 36' Curb to Curb hhX _„_ West of State Sr- l 8' 16 Parking Travel Lane 24' Curb to Curb, East of State St. 0 6 i6 IParking Travel Lane 24' Curb to Curb West of State St. r West of State St. (one-way street converted to two-way) e Travel ane Trave? Lane 2A Curb to Curb East of State St. (one-way street converted to two-way with no parking) • �_ 12' . 12 Lane ,. Travel Lane Travel 24,�E4rb to Curb West of State St. (one-way street converted to two-way with no parking) Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 18 Back of Street Sections- Page 3 Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 19 The following summarizes notable changes from the Draft Plan: A) Traffic Circulation Changes 1) Lane Reconfigurations No changes were made to the lane reconfigurations proposed in the Draft Plan. 2) Signals New traffic signals were added at the intersections of Gobbi Street and Main Street, and Main Street and Perkins Street. This would help improve traffic circulation. 3) Side Streets The traffic modifications to Smith Street were left out, meaning that Smith Street would remain as -is with one-way travel heading west. Retaining Smith Street as a one-way street would ensure that adjacent businesses have ample room for loading zones. B) Diagonal Parking All proposed diagonal parking would be at 30 degree rather than 45 degree angles as originally proposed in the Draft Plan. Diagonal parking was added to the south side of Perkins Street between State Street and School Street. This would remove on -street parallel parking on the north side of Perkins Street, and allow widened sidewalks on both sides. Also, diagonal parking is no longer recommended north of Henry Street on State Street. The resulting added width would allow wider sidewalks on both sides of the street, a widened sidewalk extension, and parallel parking on both sides. C) Bicycle Lanes No changes were made to the bicycle lanes proposed in the Draft Plan. D) Bulb -outs and Mid -Block Extensions No changes were made to the bulb -outs and mid -block extensions proposed in the Draft Plan. E) Intersection Treatments and Gateways Intersection treatments were added to Gobbi Street and State Street, and Gobbi Street and Main Street to delineate the southern gateways to the Downtown. F) Median A raised median was added to State Street between Gobbi Street and Mill Street, removing on -street parallel parking on both sides. A small raised pedestrian refuge island was added on State Street at the south side of the Church Street intersection. Given that one-way travel on Smith Street would be retained, the raised median proposed in the Draft Plan on State Street between Smith Street and Henry Street would be extended further south to the intersection since a left turn lane is no longer necessary. Also, since there would no longer be diagonal parking north of Henry Street on State Street, two raised medians were added between Henry Street and the proposed northern gateway. Space between these two medians would allow left turn movements for traffic heading north on State Street and wanting to enter driveways on the west side of the street. G) Sidewalks No changes were made to the sidewalk widening proposed in the Draft Plan. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 20 H) Trees No changes were made to the street trees proposed in the Draft Plan. Street trees on State Street and Main Street would be consistent with the City's Downtown Perkins and Street Code tree list and would add character to Ukiah's streets without interfering with current utilities, signs, and other infrastructure. Given Ukiah's hot and dry summer weather, RRM proposes native, drought -tolerant street trees that would be carefully selected and spaced depending on their respective planter sizes to encourage growth and long-term survival. See "K," Streetscape Amenities, below for a list of recommended street trees. 1) Crosswalks No changes were made to the paved crosswalks proposed in the Draft Plan. J) Street Furniture No changes were made to the street furniture proposed in the Draft Plan. See "K," Streetscape Amenities, below for a list of recommended street furniture styles. K) Streetscape Amenities The following are recommended street tree species and street furniture/material styles for State Street and Main Street within the downtown. These particular options were chosen because of their distinctiveness and ability to contribute to Ukiah's historic character. See the Downtown and Perkins Street Code for a complete description of the following street trees, including planting information. Recommended Street Trees Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 21 Littleleaf Linden Tilia cordata State Street 'Greenspire' (alternate) Al A R� State Street - Wiz: x' x: Fruitless Olive accent treeszv Olea europea for'Swan s Hill' designated •....� intersections 4 • fAk {* A ry ., Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 22 tv State Street - x. Valley • . _ v, for Gibson .� Quercus lobata }� Creek gateway P a Holly ,ak Main Stree / • w , Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 23 Recommended Street Furniture and Materials Victor Stanley, Inc. Framers Modern Series, Model FM -324 Recycled wood slats with steel frame Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report .June 23, 2009 Page 24 Olympic Foundry Model CB -F Lighted Cast aluminum and ductile cast iron LED lighted bollard (black color) htto://vNww.fairweathersf.com/led/index.php? model=CB-F-LIGHTED (Alternate) Olympic Foundry Model CB -C Removable cast aluminum and ductile cast iron bollard i ' • • • • ' i Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 25 King Luminaire Streetlights should include shields to direct lighting toward the ground and reduce light pollution. Street lights should be approximately 12-16 feet in height and placed approximately 40- 60 feet apart. ® Light poles should include banner attachment and planter arms The Community Millennium Series, Model KM 13 FC One piece tapered cast aluminum pole with octagonal base ! prod !- ..- Luminaire (non -LED option): K56 Tudor and Cleveland Luminaire Historic style in heavy-duty aluminum casting; available in glass, durable polycarbonate or high impact UV resistant acrylic http://www.stresscrete.com/king-luminaire- product/luminaires/luminaire- info.asp?style=2&type=l &product=7&mode l=l 10 Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 26 Madel lnforma=t onExam W I"'nag v„ ���. • � • • � � � � �' qtr ff Secure Site Design, Cycle Sentry Series, Model i Circular steel ! (black• • �t, 4 htti2://www.securesitedesign.com/r)roducts/"""?m ode=prodDetail&id=1 •: I' Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 27 Victor Stanley, Inc. T Series, Model T-32 Vertical steel bars flared at the top (black color) htto://www.victorstanley.com:80/products/pri ntVersion.asox?id=44 Crosswalk Paving Cobblestone paving material at crosswalks bracketed with 2' concrete bands Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 28 (Alternate) Interlocking pavers bracketed by typical crosswalk painting City of Ukiah Tree Grates Tree Grates Material: Cast gray iron ASTM A-48, Class 358 I _ Finish: No paint 3 Sizes: 36" each side Component Nos.: (2) PCS. 8704-XXXX Equipment: D87040010: K87040010 (New Corner Logos) 48" each side Component Nos.: (2) PCS. 8710-XXXX Equipment: D87100001: K87100001 (New Corner Logos) 60" each side Component Nos.: (2) PCS. 8712-XXXX Equipment: D87120001: C87120001 (New Corner Logos) Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 29 VI) Infrastructure In July of 2008, RRM's engineering department performed an assessment of the site. Investigation was performed through interviews with city staff, field inspection, and review of existing utility maps and GIS data. These conditions provided a baseline for improvement plan designs and estimated implementation costs. A) Existing Condition Constraints • High ground water table is only 3 to 4 feet below surface in some places. • Sewer lines date back to 1897 and may require replacement in the near future which if done in conventional methods would require trenching in the street. • Sewer lines are predominantly located along the center of the street which would affect whether trees are planted in a median. • Waterlines run under the sidewalk or just off the curb along both sides of State Street which could affect location of street trees. • Storm Drain projects are planned for Mill Street, Perkins Street and Clay Street in the near future. • Storm Drain inlets are located at intersections which would affect bulb -outs because movement of basins would be costly. • Gas lines appear to run under the sidewalks on the east side of both streets and could affect location of street trees. • According to the GIS data property lines extend into the sidewalks in numerous locations. This should be clarified. • There are basements that extend under the sidewalk on the south side of Perkins Street just west of State Street and on the north east corner of Church Street and State Street. • There is a tunnel under Church Street just west of State Street • There are bridges that need improvement located on State Street between Scott and Henry Streets and on Main Street between Smith Street and Norton Ave. B) Cost Estimate for Implementation of the Plan Implementation of the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan will require relocation of curb and gutter along State Street, construction of intermittent median islands, restriping of all traffic lanes, and undergrounding of all overhead utility lines. Overall cost of improvements is currently estimated at $3.8 million and $4.6 million with contingency. 1) Sidewalk Widening Extension of the existing sidewalk will require saw cutting and removing the existing curb and gutter, removal of several feet of existing asphalt and concrete base, and grinding in of the remainder to match grade. Existing drain inlets on the uphill corner of intersections will need to be relocated to prevent storm water runoff from ponding behind bulb outs. Curb ramps eliminated by sidewalk extension at intersections will need to be replaced. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 30 2) Central Median Construction Construction of central medians will require saw cutting, demolition, and removal of the existing asphalt and underlying concrete followed by construction of new curb and imported fill. The median will lie directly over the sewer which should be slip -lined to reduce the chance of fracture due to tree roots. lm ravement . Gorst ' Cost Quantii ' Relocate Inlets $8,800 ea 10 $88,000 $105,600 Curb & Gutter $30 If 7,000 $210,000 $252,000 Saw cutting $2 If 7,000 $14,000 $16,800 Curb Rams $5,000 ea 30 $150,000 $180,000 Sidewalk $6 sf 30,000 $180,000 $216,000 Relocate street lights $1,500 ea 40 $60,000 $72,000 Sidewalk on Main St $6 sf 5,600 $33,600 $40,320 Demo $3 sf 35,000 $105,000 $126,000 Asphalt grinding $0.50 sf 300,000 $150,000 $180,000 Asphalt overlay $1.50 sf 300,000 $450,000 $540,000 Patch Back $10 sf 7,000 $70,000 $84,000 :..77 $.493,20.0... 8x`'-2, 2) Central Median Construction Construction of central medians will require saw cutting, demolition, and removal of the existing asphalt and underlying concrete followed by construction of new curb and imported fill. The median will lie directly over the sewer which should be slip -lined to reduce the chance of fracture due to tree roots. 3) Traffic Channelization Extension of the sidewalk and addition of the median will reduce the road section and require reconfiguration of the lane striping. Transition to two travel lanes and a turn lane from four travel lanes will involve removal of all existing striping and markers, addition of some pedestrian push button polls, reconfiguration of the traffic signal loop modifiers, and relocation of street signs. All lane striping will need to be replaced including turn arrows and bike lanes. Im' . "rouerent Cost Quantii ' Cost Contin" it»c Curb $20 If 1,600 $32,000 $38,400 Saw cutting $2 If 1 600 $3,200 $3,840 Colored stamped concrete $10 sf 10,000 $100,000 $120,000 Import $30 vd 300 $9,000 $10,800 Demo $3 sf 8,000 $24,000 $28,800 Sewer Slip linin $75 If 3200 $240,000 $288,000 Patch Back $10 sf 1,600 $16,000 $19,200 Traffic Control $75,000 ea 1 $75,000 $90,000 subtotafi = $.493,20.0... $59� USO 3) Traffic Channelization Extension of the sidewalk and addition of the median will reduce the road section and require reconfiguration of the lane striping. Transition to two travel lanes and a turn lane from four travel lanes will involve removal of all existing striping and markers, addition of some pedestrian push button polls, reconfiguration of the traffic signal loop modifiers, and relocation of street signs. All lane striping will need to be replaced including turn arrows and bike lanes. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 31 4) Utility Undergrounding Utility undergrounding will require running conduit the length of Main Street and down most of State Street with the exception of from Clay Street to Henry Street. The process will also include providing underground service to all parcels and buildings currently serviced by the overhead system. =lrr�'iNo eirrent; .�� lm ;rvvetrient !liyit Cvst . Quainttt , Cost .. . , _w Contin Traffic Signal (main) $350,000 ea 2 $700,000 $840,000 Pedestrian push buttons $157000 ea $138,240 28 $420,000 $504,000 Yellow stripin $1 If (main) 12,000 $12,000 $14,400 White striping $1 If $350 18,000 $18,000 $21,600 Pavement marking arrows $40 ea 80 $3,200 $3,840 Signal loop modifiers $60,000 ea 4 $240,000 $288,000 Removal of existing markers $1,500 Is 1 $1,500 $1,800 Relocation of street signs $400 1 ea 1 15 $6,000 $7,200 7,777 7777777777 600 4) Utility Undergrounding Utility undergrounding will require running conduit the length of Main Street and down most of State Street with the exception of from Clay Street to Henry Street. The process will also include providing underground service to all parcels and buildings currently serviced by the overhead system. Implementation of the project in phases may lead to additional costs associated with traffic control and temporary traffic signage. VII) IMPLEMENTATION The approval of the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan will enable the City to position itself to secure state and federal funds for implementation of the plan improvements. A phased approach to implementation will allow the City to tackle the project early and work incrementally toward implementation of the elements described in this plan and supporting illustrations. The conceptual plans provide a long term vision for the State Street and Main Street corridors through downtown Ukiah and provide a guide for the City as it continues to maintain and upgrade infrastructure and provide community services. The following provides a summary of potential phasing and several possible funding sources for construction and maintenance of the proposed improvements. A) Strategies for Implementation This section describes potential actions or next steps toward implementing the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan (the Plan). This includes approval of the roadway =lrr�'iNo eirrent; .�� Unrt Cci3t2t�iant�t ..,Cost : .Cantii'a enc Utility undergrounding (state) $60 If 1,920 $115,200 $138,240 Utility undergrounding (main) $60 If 3,100 $186,000 $223,200 'Utility¢service to buildings $350 ea 90 $31,500 $3/7�,800 subtotri/, . 7777777 133Z1.7�0 .. 399 24D Implementation of the project in phases may lead to additional costs associated with traffic control and temporary traffic signage. VII) IMPLEMENTATION The approval of the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan will enable the City to position itself to secure state and federal funds for implementation of the plan improvements. A phased approach to implementation will allow the City to tackle the project early and work incrementally toward implementation of the elements described in this plan and supporting illustrations. The conceptual plans provide a long term vision for the State Street and Main Street corridors through downtown Ukiah and provide a guide for the City as it continues to maintain and upgrade infrastructure and provide community services. The following provides a summary of potential phasing and several possible funding sources for construction and maintenance of the proposed improvements. A) Strategies for Implementation This section describes potential actions or next steps toward implementing the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan (the Plan). This includes approval of the roadway Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report ,June 23, 2009 Page 32 lane reconfigurations and streetscape design improvements, additional studies, and capital improvement updates. 1) Actions Items The next steps of action are provided in descending order of importance. However, some steps will need to be executed simultaneously and are described as such. Step 1: Approval of the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan The first step to implementing the Plan is for the City Council to approve the Plan and Final Report. Once approved, the City and agencies will have a guiding document to begin applying for funding and grants to help implement the Plan. Step 2: Develop a Funding Strategy Developing a funding strategy requires identification of the funds that would be appropriate for the improvements for the corridor, and to assign or hire a grant administrator to oversee the process as described below. a. Determine Which Funds to Pursue The City should target appropriate funding streams for the capital improvements and maintenance of streetscape improvements. Earmarking funds today will establish a base of matching funds for grants in the near future (refer to Funding section below). b. Appoint a Grant Administrator The City will need to appoint or hire a person or team to begin to actively pursue public grant monies. A grant administrator will need to act on the City's behalf to oversee the application process and to make sure the terms of any grants awarded are fulfilled. The grant team will need to identify specific funding opportunities, coordinate specific grants with the appropriate portions of the project and complete grant applications within the required time frame. Step 3: Apply for Grants to Fund the Streetscape Improvement Plan The City should be prepared to apply for grants to fund the preparation of design development and construction documents for the Streetscape Improvement Plan for State Street and Main Street in the downtown area. This includes the preparation of engineered road and streetscape improvement drawings and specifications in order to construct the new improvements (including road reconfigurations, landscaping, and furniture palette) as delineated in the Streetscape Design Concepts. A phased approach is recommended that allows for staggered funding cycles and coordination with other public improvements projects. Step 4: Prepare the Streetscape Improvement Plan RFP Package Upon obtaining grant funding, proceed with hiring an engineering and landscape architecture firm, and commence with producing engineered construction drawings and specifications for the Streetscape Improvement Plan. Step 5: Environmental Review and Permitting Any publicly -funded project is required by law to comply with the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), another potentially lengthy process, before construction can begin. The City should begin applying for permits and undergoing environmental review during the design and engineering phase as soon as a definite Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 33 scope of improvements has been determined. This will allow a resiliency in both processes: the review will consider all of the potential impacts, and improvement designs will be revised based on Initial Study review. Costs associated with environmental review vary based on the scope of work and permits required. Step 6: Private Property Owners Negotiations As soon as the Development Plan has been approved, negotiations with property owners should begin for any necessary public access and right-of-way negotiations, and to facilitate any shared parking agreements (as a result of potential driveway consolidations). Step 7: Establish a Maintenance Plan Before construction for the streetscape begins, the City should establish a plan for the maintenance of the public improvements. It should include landscaping, lighting, furniture and walkway maintenance. The City will need to examine the alternative methods available and decide on the most affordable and feasible one for the downtown corridor. Alternatives may include: City Public Works Department as lead agency, creating a Landscape & Lighting District, or creating a Business Improvements District. `These programs should be designed to support and complement the efforts currently implemented by the Ukiah Chamber of Commerce and Ukiah Main Street Program. Step 8: Streetscape Construction and Phasing Once construction documents are completed and approved and construction funding is in place the construction documents will be put out to bid and installation of public improvements can begin. Part of this process will require a construction manager to oversee the phasing of installations and coordinate the improvements with agencies such as PGE if any undergrounding of utilities is to take place. A strategic phasing of the improvements may include the following: o An initial step may include restriping the roadways per the prescribed lane and parking widths determined by W -Trans in the Traffic Analysis (see Appendix Q. The restriping could include the reconfiguration of Standley Street and Henry Street from 1 -way to 2 -way streets to improve the efficiency of the traffic flow through the downtown area. o It is anticipated per the Traffic Analysis that the parallel parking in front the plaza downtown will remain parallel until driving behaviors adapt slightly slower speeds consistent with a pedestrian -oriented environment. Once that occurs the parallel parking in that area can be reconfigured to diagonal parking. o The final phase would include integrating the remainder of the improvements described in this report including the widening of sidewalks along State Street and the prescribed landscaping and streetscape amenities throughout the downtown corridor. B) Funding the Downtown Improvement Plan Program In implementing the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan, it will be essential to develop long term funding strategies to design, construct, and maintain the improvements envisioned in this Plan. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report ,June 23, 2009 Page 34 The primary purpose of this section is to identify and briefly describe potential funding sources and financing vehicles for the public costs associated with the Improvement Program recommended by the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan. 1) The Process Overview Keeping track of potential funding sources is a full time job. Many cities retain a full time staff person for this function. There are literally thousands of potential sources. There are also hundreds of publications and web sites that have information on these sources, and each source has different requirements for the activity, matching funds, application procedures, qualifying criteria, and so forth. Many of these funding programs are undergoing constant changes in their rules and guidelines. In some cases this means that even the participating lenders are not familiar with the current rules and must be guided through the process. It will require an ongoing effort to seek out and apply for various, grants and loans as implementation proceeds. There are several important points to be kept in mind with regard to all of these funding sources: o Except where indicated, most of these sources can be used for implementation and construction activities. o Many sources require that a specific number of jobs be created at certain levels of funding and many funding sources are specifically aimed at existing businesses. o Some sources may require a matching contribution from the recipient or from the private sector. o All of these programs are very competitive and generally receive between 5 and 10 applications per grant award. 2) Who Applies for Funding Applications for most grant programs would need to be submitted by the City. Applications that demonstrate a partnership between agencies are viewed favorably. In most cases additional planning would be required to establish assessment district boundaries or conduct a nexus analysis to impose fees to cover ongoing maintenance expenses. The table below presents a summary of the salient characteristics of each funding source and the agencies administering these funds. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES for Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Agency/Program Focus on Bike/Ped Maximum Grant Next Round A. MCOG Programs Overall Work Program (Transportation Planning) State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) varies cyclical (Dec 2009) Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report ,June 23, 2009 Page 35 Regional Surface Transportation Program Funds (RSTP)-s ecial projects $100,000 total annual Transportation Enhancement Program (TE) -Regional X $2 m total 2010 Transportation Development Act (TDA) -bike funds X $50,000 annual STP d(1) varies (average $100,000) annual Prop 42 (Traffic Congestion Relief Pro ram—TCRP)per Average $64,000 year quarterly C. Caltrans Programs State Highway Operations and Protection Plan (SHOPP) fully committed cyclical Transportation Enhancement Program (TE) -inter - Regional X none stated 2008 Safe Routes to School (Hi hwa 2S) X $1 m annual Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) X $1.25 m annual Environmental Enhancement & Mitigations Program (EEM) $350,000 annual Federal Exchange and State Match Programs $100,000 annual D. State Treasurer Programs Sustainable Communities Grant and Loan Program (SCGL) $350,000 annual E. Coastal Trail and Planning Grants Grants -for Coastal Trail X none stated ongoing F. State Housing and Community Development Programs Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)- Economic Development $500,000 on oin G. Federal Programs USDA -Rural Business Enterprise Grants (RBEG) $200,000 annual Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $900,000 m annual Safe Routes to School Program (Hi hwa TS) X $1 m annual Community -Based Transportation Planning and Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grants $300,000 Annual or 2 ears Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Annual (Oct 2009) H. Private Funding Programs Foundations varies ongoing Corporate Sponsors/Fu nd raisin I. Pacific Gas & Electric Company Programs Undergrounding J. Local Financing Vehicles Development Impact Fees (DIF) Benefit Assessments Private Business Improvement District (PBID) Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 36 3) The Programs a. MCOG Programs i) STIP Funds STIP - Bicycle & Pedestrian 5% Program. In 1998, MCOG adopted a modal split funding formula which dedicated 5% of the region's State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding to bicycle and pedestrian projects. A total of $391,000 was awarded to local agencies for bicycle and pedestrian projects in the 2000 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) through a local, competitive process. In the 2002 STIP, bicycle and pedestrian projects received $1,262,000 in funding, which included funding reserved from the 2000 STIP Augmentation. Unfortunately, no new funding was made available to the region in the 2004 or 2006 STIP cycles. The modal split will be reconsidered by MCOG when sufficient STIP funding is once again available to the region. Future cycles of the Bicycle & Pedestrian 5% Program represent an outstanding opportunity to implement improvements indentified in the Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan. ii) RSTP Funds Most shares are passed through to the County and cities on a formula basis. MCOG retains up to $100,000 per year for partnering on important regional projects. iii) Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Funds Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds are generated from State gasoline sales taxes and are returned to the source counties from which they originate to fund transportation projects. Article 3 funds provide a 2 percent set aside of the County TDA funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Eligible projects include right-of-way acquisition; planning, design and engineering; support programs; and construction of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, including retrofitting to meet ADA requirements, and related facilities. MCOG awards approximately $50,000 per year from TDA funds to bike and pedestrian projects. These funds can be used as matching fund requirements for state and federal grants. Administering Agency Project Type: Eligible Projects: Application Deadline: iv) STP d(1) MCOG Construction, Planning, Bicycle, Pedestrian Varies, Contact MCOG Maintenance, Education The: revenue for this funding source varies on a yearly basis. For the last several years the City received an average of $100,000 per year. The primary funding restriction is that these funds may only be utilized on Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 37 streets classified as collector and above. This funding is typically an annual distribution from the Mendocino Council of Governments to the City of Ukiah. Administering Agency: MCOG v) Prop 42 (Traffic Congestion Relief Program—TCRP) These funds may be diverted at the State level due to budget emergencies. However, when funding is distributed, the City receives an average of $64,000 per year. TCRP funds are distributed quarterly. Administering Agency: State c. Caltrans Programs i) Transportation Enhancement (TE) Program TE is a Federal funding source that provides for transportation -related capital improvement projects that enhance quality -of -life, in or around transportation facilities. TE projects must fall within twelve specific categories, including the provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles, the provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists, and preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails). The TE program is authorized by the Federal government in 6 -year cycles under the federal surface transportation bill. Administering Agency: Caltrans / MCOG Project Type: Construction Eligible Projects: Varies Application Deadline: Varies Web Link: http://w-ww.dot.ca.gov/hq/TransEnhAct/ TransEnact. htm Regional TE These funds are awarded by MCOG. The entire recent round of funding has been awarded. The next round of funding is not expected until 2010 Inter -regional TE These funds are awarded by Caltrans for projects on State highways. This is a reimbursable capital -improvement program. Projects must comply with federal environmental requirements and other federal regulations, including those for considering disadvantaged business enterprises in consultant selection and for paying prevailing wages during construction. Transportation Enhancement activities must have a direct relationship - by function, proximity or impact - to the surface transportation system. Activities must be over and above normal projects, including mitigation. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 38 d. State Treasurer Program I) Sustainable Communities Grant and Loan Program (SCGL) This program is sponsored by the State Treasurer's Office in their role as the California Pollution Control financing authority. The grants are intended to encourage sustainable development which includes infill development, proximity to transportation, and promotion of economic development in low income areas, support alternative transportation and so forth. The funds can be used for planning or implementation. The maximum grant amount is $350,000. Total annual amount statewide is $2.5 million. Counties and cities are eligible. Counties can submit one application per round. Application solicitation is currently awaiting funding authorization but is expected by the end of the year. e. State Housing and Community Development Programs I) Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) The CDBG program is a flexible program that provides communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. The program provides money for streetscape revitalization, which may be largely comprised of pedestrian improvements. Federal Community Development Block Grant Grantees may "use CDBG funds for activities that include (but are not limited to): acquisition of property for public purposes; construction or reconstruction of streets, water and sewer facilities, neighborhood centers, recreation facilities, and other public works; demolition; rehabilitation of public and private buildings; public services; planning activities; assistance to nonprofit entities for community development activities; and assistance to private, for profit entities to carry out economic development activities (including assistance to micro -enterprises)." Administering Agency: CA Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Project Type: Construction Eligible Projects: Various Public Works Improvements Application Deadline: On-going Web Link: http://www.hcd.ca.gov/fa/cdbg/about.htmi ii) CDBG Planning & Technical Assistance These Planning and Technical Assistance grants offer up to $35,000 each. Each county is eligible for two grants per year, one for General Allocation projects (housing and infrastructure) and one for Economic Development projects. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 39 f. Federal Programs i) USDA -Rural Business Enterprise Grants (RBEG) These grants are available to cities and non -profits. The primary criterion is the creation of jobs and economic development, with an emphasis on small businesses. They can be used for training, RLFs, technical assistance, capital expenditures, parking, fa4ade improvements and other uses. Not all costs are eligible for Rural Business Enterprise Grant funds. RBEG funds are intended to jump-start new projects to meet the critical needs portion of the project. They typically range from $100,000 to $200,000. Notification of Funding Availability for the next round is expected in December. These grants are generally very competitive. A. Private Funding Programs i) Corporate`Sponsors/Fundraising Corporate sponsorship has become a major source of funding for large- scale projects with substantial public exposure. Corporate sponsors are potential sources of funding for facilities, where they can put their name on the facilities and/or special events they can be identified with. Possible sponsors include tourism -related companies (such as hotels) or local companies seeking goodwill in the community. Some communities have successfully used local fundraising campaigns to fund community amenities such as trails and landscaping. ii) Foundations Foundation giving is governed by specific guidelines that stipulate purposes for which grant money can be used, areas of foundation interest and geographic jurisdiction. Competition for foundation funding has become exceedingly competitive, with many foundations deciding to focus on social problems (housing, poverty, medical care, literacy, education, etc.). In most cases they are guided by some affinity for the project, such as location near a company facility or employee sponsorship. However, there are still foundations that provide funding for community facilities, amenities and beautification. A preliminary search conducted by Action Network identified several examples: American Express; America the Beautiful Fund: Keep America Beautiful, Inc., The Pew Charitable Trusts; PepsiCo Foundation; and State Farm Mutual Contributions. h. Pacific Gas & Electric Company Programs ams i) Undergrounding AT&T, with PG&E, has an ongoing program to underground electrical wires under Rule 21A of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 40 Streetscape improvements should coordinate in every way possible with undergrounding projects. i. Local Financing Vehicles i) Development Impact Fees AB 1600 regulates the way that impact fees are imposed. It requires that a nexus or connection be made between a fee and the type of development on which the fee is imposed. A development fee cannot be imposed to correct an existing problem or pay for improvements needed for existing development. Development Impact Fees do not require a vote of the people. Thus, in the case of Ukiah a nexus study would need to be conducted to demonstrate that future development will require certain improvements. Then assuming that an impact fee is approved, the funds would not be available until the new development occurred. ii) Benefit Assessments These are levies imposed within a designated district to finance a specific maintenance or capital improvements. The improvements must specifically benefit the properties. The levy can vary among properties depending on square ft or property frontage. To form an assessment district, 50% approval is required from the property owners. In some cases there are different tiers within the district which pay different assessments. iii) Private Business Improvement District (PBID) A PBID is financed through special assessments on commercial properties. Passage requires a 50% approval by the property owners in the District. The assessment must be re -approved every five years. Typically these revenues are used for public space maintenance, security, and promotion. iv) Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act The Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act was passed by the Legislature in 1982 in response to reduced funding opportunities brought about by the passage of Proposition 13. The Mello -Roos Act allows any county, city, special district, school district or joint powers of authority to establish a Community Facility Districts (CFD) for the purpose of financing of public improvements and services. The services and improvements that Mello - Roos CFDs can finance include streets, sewer systems and other basic infrastructure, police protection, fire protection, ambulance services, schools, parks, libraries, museums and other cultural facilities. By law, the CFD is also entitled to recover expenses needed to form the CFD and administer the annual special taxes and bonded debt. CFDs must be approved by a two-thirds margin of qualified voters in the district. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Final Report June 23, 2009 Page 41 Property owners within the district are responsible for paying back the bonds. Pedestrian facilities are eligible for funding under CFD bonds. Administering Agency: Local Agency Project Type: Construction/Maintenance Eligible Projects: Various Public Works Improvements Application Deadline: None v) Mitigations/Exactions Mitigations can be imposed whenever a development requires approval by a local entity. Mitigations are imposed as a condition on a tentative map for private development projects. These conditions reflect on and off site mitigations that must be completed in order to be able to develop. Development agreements are another form of mitigation. Mitigations can include providing adequate pedestrian access, setbacks, parking requirements, lighting, signage, sidewalks, landscaping and so forth. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan June 5, 2009 Appendices Appendix A: ••r• and • Map 1 RO�;�t 000, =0.., LU U., E E (U C) o > C;) (M CL u 0 u a xx uuj CL 41 I T 1 RO�;�t 000, =0.., LU U., E E (U > tf CL 2 0 E a E5 2 SO 0 o o- uj Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan June 5, 2009 Appendices •'9 10' RRM Design Group 10 Liberty Ship Way, Ste. 10 „ Sausalito, CA 94965 P:(415)331-8282 F:(415)331-8298 .,i www.rrmdesign.com tv =4 rresingroup creating environments people enjoy" DowntownUkiah ,Improvement Public Workshop #1: Issue Identification, Priority Setting, and Design July 15, /1: Workshop Results 1. Introduction On Thursday, July 11, 2008, the first public workshop for the City of Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan was held in the Cabernet Room at the Ukiah Valley Conference Center. The purpose of this initial workshop was to obtain input on the issues and ideas that will need to be addressed in developing a streetscape improvement plan for the Downtown, to have workshop participants prioritize those ideas that were most and least important, and to then conduct a design brainstorming session to inform the future physical planning of the Downtown sections of Main Street and State Street. Attendance at the workshop was unfortunately very low at only 10 people, the majority of which were City of Ukiah employees. RRM is interested in cooperating with the City to explore other publicity "campaign" options that would ensure better attendance at the next public workshop. As such the results of this workshop are not as meaningful as the input of a better representation from the community. During the Issue Identification period, participant comments on the issues and ideas associated with each of the eight topic areas were recorded on the appropriate banners. Once completed, RRM facilitated a Priority Setting tape dot exercise to gauge participant preferences, after which the results were briefly recapped. Participants were then asked to work together at two tables to utilize what came out of the priority setting exercise and do some design brainstorming for improvements along Main Street and State Street. This report summarizes the outcome of the Issue Identification and Priority Setting exercise, as well as the outcome of the design brainstorming session noting areas of commonalities and differences. The report also recommends alternative improvement programs that would be explored in two Alternative Concept Plans to be presented at the next public workshop tentatively scheduled for July 31, 2008. 11. Issue Identification and Priority Setting Exercise A total of eight (8) topic banners were placed on the walls within the room. The topics were chosen based on the stakeholder interviews to solicit input from workshop attendees regarding any issues, concerns, or ideas associated with that particular topic. The eight topic areas were as follows: • Walkability (Crossings & Walkways) • Landscaping & Stormwater Features COMMUNITY I PUBLIC SAFETY I RECREATION I EDUCATION I URBAN ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS I WWW.RRMDEStGN.COM A CeBomie Corpomtion I Victor Montgomery, Architect#C11090I Jerry Nctmel, PE •36895, LS #62761 Jeff Father, LA#M creating environments people enjoy - Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 2 of 10 • Street Furniture & Lighting • Gateways • Parking • State Street • Main Street • Other RRM Design Group facilitators went through the banners one at a time and participant comments were written on the appropriate banners. Upon completion of all of the banners, participants were then given tape dots to prioritize the issues by indicating their support or lack of support for the ideas. Those tape dots were distributed as follows: • Two (2) large green tape dots indicating the strongest support on a topic area or statement under one of those topics. • Twelve (12) small green dots indicating support for any of the statements. • One (1) large red dot indicating strongest opposition to an idea or concept listed under the topic banners. • Six (6) small red dots also indicating lack of support for a statement made under the banners. The topic banners garnering the most voter activity were "Walkability" and "State Street" both with 27 votes, followed by "Landscaping & Stormwater Features" with 14 votes. These results indicate many of the attendees who participated in the exercise felt strongly about making the Downtown streetscape more pedestrian friendly and incorporating more natural features, especially on State Street. The following is a summary of statements, descending from most active to least active, with votes expressed as percentages of the total votes on that topic banner. The first column states Support for the statement. The second column states Opposition toward the statement. The actual tallies of the tape dot exercise are attached at the back of this report. Walkability (27 total dots) 7 votes- Most important topic Greatest Support (GS), Support Great Opposition (GO) Opposed Bulb -outs to shorten crossings (18.5%) Reduce crossing distance on State (18.5%) More shade (14.8%) "Histo Walk" (7.4%) 3.7% Introduce sidewalks where none (7.4%) Slow traffic on State (7.4%) Enhance ADA on both streets (3.7%) Lighting barrier at crossings (3.7%) Reduce straight -in parking 3.7% GO Separation between traffic & sidewalk (3.7%) rrmdesigngroup III creating environments people enjoy" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 3 of 10 Traffic control at Smith & State 3.7% Widen sidewalks on Main (3.7%) Improve crossing at Smith & State State Street (27 total dots) 2 votes- Second most important topic Greatest Support (GS), Support Great Opposition (GO) Opposed Space for outdoor cafe (seating on sidewalk) (18.5%) Bulb -outs 0 4.8%) -Improve pedestrian crossings (14.8%) Beautification (1 1.1 %) More street trees (7.4%) Reduce to 2 lanes 7.4% Soften edges of buildings at walkway (7.4%) Traffic calming (7.4%) -Diagonal parking 3.7% GO New pavement surface (3.7%) Was to dampen noise (3.7%) Nota pleasant place to walk Landscaping & Stormwater Features (14 total dots) 2 votes- Third most important topic Greatest Support (GS), Support Great Opposition (GO) Opposed More trees (21.4%) Wider sidewalks with street trees (7.1% GS 14.3%) Bioswale strips as way to reduce pavement (7.1 %) 7.1% -Replenish creeks (14.3%) Street -level landscaping (14.3%) Avoid allergenic trees (7.1%) Stormwater cells 7.1% -Diversity of trees to avoid disease Pear trees= heart -Safety considerations (fire rescue access) Street Furniture & Lighting 0 3 total dots) 1 vote- Fourth most important topic Greatest Support (GS), Support Vintage lights reflecting late 1800s (23.1%) Cohesive signage 0 5.4%) Good li htin -at crosswalks (15.4%) -incorporate seating into green areas & with trees Great Opposition (GO) Opposed Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 4 of 10 .(15.4%) Outdoor seating at cafes (15.4%) More public places to sit (7.7%) Natural -looking trash containers (as at School St) (7.7%) Consistent trash & recycling containers Limit light pollution More & safe bike racks Main Street J11 total dots) Fifth most important topic Greatest Support (GS), Support rrmdesigngroup creating environments people enjoy'" Great Opposition (GO) Opposed One-way couplet on State & Main (7.7% GS, 7.7%) 15.4% Traffic calming (15.4%) 7.7% Upgrade parking lot lands & paving (23.1%) Underground utilities (7.7% GS, 7.7%) "Street printing" or special treatment at Main & Perkins (7.7%) Too plain by Norton Gateways (11 total dots) Greatest Support (GS), Support Great Opposition (GO) Opposed Bridge at Gibson Creek (18.2%) Public art 0 8.2 %) Roundabout at Perkins & Orchard (9.1%) 9.1% Coordinate with varying streets (9.1%) Green gateways (9.1%) Intersection at Perkins & State (9.1%) Roundabout or gateway at Gobbi & State (9.1% GS) Ukiah Theater s ig n (9.1%) Overhead banners Roundabout at Gobbi & Main Parkinq (2 total dots) Greatest Support (GS), Support Great Opposition (GO) Opposed Better landscape & development of private parking on Main 0 00%) etter spacing of loading zones Consolidate driveways & parking on Main (reduce curb cuts) Retain diagonal parking Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results .July 15, 2008 Page 5 of 10 Other (2 total dots) rrmdesigngroup III creating environments people enjoy" Greatest Support (GS), Support Great Opposition (GO) Opposed [TGateway at 101 and Perkins (50%) 50% GO The following summarizes the banner statements with the most activity in terms of statement support or opposition. 1) Strong Support • Bulb -outs to shorten crossings • Provide more shade, more trees throughout • Improve pedestrian crossings on State, Reduce crossing distance, include Bulb -outs • Beautification on State Street • Wider sidewalks with street trees, Space for outdoor cafe (seating on sidewalk) on State • Vintage lights reflecting late 1800 • Upgrade parking lot lands & paving • Enhance Bridge at Gibson Creek on State Street 2) Support • Slow traffic on State, provide Traffic calming • Introduce sidewalks where none • More street trees on State • Soften edges of buildings at walkway on State • Street -level landscaping • Replenish creeks • Incorporate seating into green areas & with trees • Good lighting at crosswalks • Cohesive signage • Underground utilities on Main • Public Art • Better landscape & development of private parking on Main 3) Nearly Equal Support and Opposition • "History Walk" • Bioswale strips as way to reduce pavement • One-way couplet on State & Main • Traffic calming on Main • Roundabout at Perkins & Orchard • Gateway at 101 and Perkins creating environments people enjoy'" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 6 of 10 4) Opposition • Reduce straight -in parking • Traffic control at Smith & State • Diagonal parking on State • Reduce State to 2 lanes • Stormwater cells 5) Controversial Issues- these items will require further discussion since there was not agreement on them: • Bioswale strips as way to reduce pavement • One-way couplet on State & Main • Traffic calming on Main • Roundabout at Perkins & Orchard • Gateway at 101 and Perkins III. Design Charrette Exercise Of the two (2) tables participating in the design brainstorming exercise, one table looked at all of Downtown Ukiah, identifying current hazard areas and adding landscaping, sidewalks, bulb -outs, one-way streets, and a gateway. The other table focused more on a "core area" of the Downtown, defined as the sections of State Street and Main Street between Clay Street and Henry Street. This table added benches/seating, street lighting, sidewalks, bulb -outs, trees, a decorative crosswalk, a roundabout, a bridge element, and an opened creek. Of the features drawn on the plan these were the results. A. Gateway Elements Both tables drew gateway elements at the point where the creek crosses State Street, one of which showing a bridge feature. One table added a roundabout at Main Street and Gobbi Street that could be part of a gateway treatment. B. Street Furniture One table added benches/seating on every block, and more street lamps at crosswalks. D. Pedestrian Elements Both tables depicted changes that would make Main Street and State Street more pedestrian -friendly. One showed sidewalk additions all along Perkins Street east of Main Street and also highlighted a decorative crosswalk element at State and Perkins, as well as bulb -outs in the "core area" at the intersections of State and Perkins, State and Standley, State and Smith, Main and Perkins, Main and Standley, and Main and Smith. • • • creating environments people enjoy'" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 7 of 10 The other table had sidewalk additions at the north end of Main Street in front of the trailer park, at the intersection of Main Street and Clay Street, and in front of the Grace Hudson Museum and Sun House. This table showed limited bulb -outs at the intersection of State Street and Gobbi Street on the northern side of State Street, as well as on the west side of State Street at the end of Norton Ave. G. Streetscape Elements Another common theme among both tables was a "greening" of Main Street and State Street. One table added street trees in the "core area" between Church Street and Henry Street. The other table drew landscaping in front of the theater on State Street as well as along both sides of State Street between Mill Street and Smith Street. This table also had landscaping along both sides of Main Street near Clay Street and Stephenson Street. H. Hazards One table noted intersection hazards at Main and Mill, Main and Clay, State and Seminary, State and Clay, State and Stephenson, State and Church, State and Smith, State and Henry, and Mason and Perkins. I. Creek Daylighting One table proposed opening up the creek all through the Downtown. Traffic Changes One table had a one-way couplet on State Street and Main Street between Gobbi Street and Norton Ave, with State going South and Main going North. The other table retained the existing two travel lanes in both directions and no parking changes on State Street, and two travel lanes and parallel parking on Main Street. In terms of what can be learned from these drawings, it is apparent that the safety and comfort of pedestrians was an important issue. The beautification of State Street and Main Street mainly by means of additional trees, landscaping, and gateway elements was also a common theme. In general, the focus was on creating a distinct, pedestrian friendly Downtown. IV. What Does It All Mean? From the results of the tape dot exercise and the design charette, it is evident there was a dominating presence of City of Ukiah employees. Of the 10 people who participated in the exercise, 8 of them or nearly 80% of the attendees were key City players and stakeholders. creating environments people enjoy" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 8 of 10 There are a number of findings and conclusions that can be derived from this first workshop. Among them are the following: 1. There was overwhelming support for improving the walkability, landscaping, and general aesthetics of the Downtown streetscape to reflect Ukiah's historical character. However, participants were split on whether changes to the existing traffic system were necessary to achieve these goals. 2. With respect to parking, attendees at the workshop did not give much attention to the issue, in contrast to the key stakeholder interviews in which parking was a main concern. Participants were split on the issue of parking, generally supporting existing parallel parking over diagonal parking. 3. There was generally support for some type of vegetated landscape treatment along the streets, though exactly what these might look like was undecided. 4. There appeared to be consensus for restoring the creek or adding some type of creek element, with emphasis on a bridge element. 5. There was strong support for increasing the vitality of the Downtown streetscapes by encouraging more uses on the sidewalks such as outdoor restaurant seating. V. Recommended Alternative Improvement Programs Based on the feedback received at the key stakeholder interviews and the findings from the two exercises conducted at the first public workshop, two Alternative Streetscape Plans will be prepared for Main Street and State Street. The two different approaches and their elements suggested below retain the two-way street circulation on both streets, should the City wish to explore the one-way couplet as proposed by the workshop participants this will require further discussion. To achieve the desired traffic calming we suggest converting to three lanes, two travel lanes and one center turn lane, with parallel on -street parking. This allows for wider sidewalks fro more usability and more landscaping to increase shade. 1. Focused Downtown Core Option This option would focus major improvements to the Downtown streetscape within a core area centered around the historic portion of Downtown near the County Courthouse. Improvements outside of the core area but still within the Downtown could also occur but at a lesser degree. This option would concentrate on creating a distinct Center that would emphasize Ukiah's "Old Town." Improvements would include distinctive landscaping, special paving at crosswalks and at bulb -outs, and street furniture in this core area. Gateways would be on the form of a special feature at the north side of the plaza and at the creek crossing on State Street. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 9 of 10 2. Expanded Downtown Option rrmdesigngroup creating environments people enjoy - This option would treat the larger Downtown of the project area with the same theme. Improvements would be throughout the Downtown rather than in the core area, and would include landscaping, special paving at crosswalks only, limited bulb -outs on State Street, and street furniture. Gateway features would be at the corner of State and Gobbi Streets and at Norton Avenue. 3. Common Elements to both Alternatives The following improvements would be common features in both alternatives: Gateway elements that would clearly signal one's entry into the Downtown area. 2. Bridge elements to highlight the creek. 3. A consistent and continuous network of sidewalks. 4. "Green streets" with expanded vegetated landscaping, a continuous canopy of substantial street trees, and other sustainable methods such as swales and permeable paving. 5. Street furniture consistent with a historical aesthetic. 6. Traffic calming measures. 7. Bulb -outs to reduce crosswalk lengths and to slow traffic. 8. An enhanced east -west connection between City Hall and the Grace Hudson Museum and Sun House. 9. Expanded sidewalk spaces for outdoor restaurant seating. 10. Street beautification methods such as decorative paving, public art, etc. 11. Enhancements to the Alex R. Thomas Plaza to increase shade, seating, and community interaction. : IL creating environments people enjoy"" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #1 Report on Results July 15, 2008 Page 10 of 10 * Note: The Green Street treatment on Main Street will result in no bike lanes and no on - street parking. Parking will need to be accommodated on-site and in parking lots. Other ideas: Introduce arcades over the sidewalks for more shade, and may use the fa4ade improvement program for maintenance requirement. Pa:\2008\1 408530-Ukiah-Dotrintov�m-Streetscape-Improvement-Plan\Planning\Tasl;-B.01 Workshop]\Document\Results\WS 1-ResultsReport.doc Features Focused Downtown Core Option Expanded Downtown Option 1. Gateways Place at the core area entrances Place at the Downtown entrances (at Plaza and at the creek (Gobbi Street and Norton Ave) crossing) 2. Travel Lanes Reduce to three lanes Reduce to three lanes 3. Sidewalks State -Expand sidewalks. State- Expand some sidewalks as Main Street - Add sidewalks where pop -outs at restaurants. they are lacking Main - Add sidewalks where they are lacking. 4. Parking Retain parallel parking. Retain parallel parking 5. Bike Lanes Use Main Street Use Rail Trail share the road 6. State St. Add Bulb -outs and ornamental Round about at Gobbi Intersection Traffic crosswalks calming 7. Bulb -outs Focus bulb -outs in the core area Provide bulb -outs at heavily used (both State & Main). introduce pedestrian intersections some sidewalk pop -outs for outdoor dining 8. Alex R. Redesign the plaza to be more Enhance existing plan with more Thomas Plaza inviting. Remove on -street parking shade, seating, etc. Remove at frontage with State St. and pop- diagonal parking out the sidewalk and landscape. 9. East -west Create a pedestrian -only section Strengthen east -west connections connections on Church St between School St on Seminary Ave to Grace Hudson and State Street. park. 10. Street Focus intense landscaping in the Distribute trees throughout the beautification core area, street trees in the entire corridor, some landscaping & public art* remainder. at major intersections and in roundabout * Note: The Green Street treatment on Main Street will result in no bike lanes and no on - street parking. Parking will need to be accommodated on-site and in parking lots. Other ideas: Introduce arcades over the sidewalks for more shade, and may use the fa4ade improvement program for maintenance requirement. Pa:\2008\1 408530-Ukiah-Dotrintov�m-Streetscape-Improvement-Plan\Planning\Tasl;-B.01 Workshop]\Document\Results\WS 1-ResultsReport.doc rrmdengroup III creating environments people enjoy'" NOW -81. 14 d •.,• On Tuesday, May 12, 2009, the second public workshop for the City of Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan was held in the Cabernet 2 Room at the Ukiah Valley Conference Center. The purpose of this workshop was to review the traffic and circulation improvements recommended by W -Trans, present the Preferred Concept Plan, and obtain feedback on the Preferred Concept Plan through a "Report Card" exercise. About 28 people attended the workshop. This report summarizes the outcome of the Report Card exercise, as well as other comments that were gathered at the workshop. Report Card Exercise RRM distributed "Report Cards" to the workshop attendees which asked a series of questions to obtain feedback on the Preferred Concept Plan. The Report Cards were meant to gauge whether attendees generally preferred the existing or proposed street section configurations and whether they supported or opposed specific elements of the Plan. 26 Report Cards were collected. Of those who submitted a Report Card, 1 person indicated that they live in the project area, 9 people indicated that they own a business in the project area, and 5 people indicated that they own property in the project area. Participators also included one or more persons that live near Downtown Ukiah, work in the project area, patronize locally -owned businesses, are former business owner in the project area, are Mendocino Council of Government (MCOG) members, are City staff members, are members of Mendocino County ReLeaf, are members of the Main Street Program Board, are members of the Friends of the Palace, are City Council Members, manage local museums/attractions, and are Design Review Board Members. The following table tallies the results of the first question on the Report Card exercise, which asked if participants preferred the existing or proposed street sections. Shaded cells indicate the majority vote. f' Proposed RRM Design Group Ukiah Downtown 10 Liberty Ship Way, Ste. 10 Comments Public Workshop #2: Sausalito, CA 94965° 24 votes May 12, 2009 P: (415) 331-8282 F: (415) 331-8298 (8%) Workshop Results www.rnndesign.com 10' sidewalks I. Introduction rrmdengroup III creating environments people enjoy'" NOW -81. 14 d •.,• On Tuesday, May 12, 2009, the second public workshop for the City of Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan was held in the Cabernet 2 Room at the Ukiah Valley Conference Center. The purpose of this workshop was to review the traffic and circulation improvements recommended by W -Trans, present the Preferred Concept Plan, and obtain feedback on the Preferred Concept Plan through a "Report Card" exercise. About 28 people attended the workshop. This report summarizes the outcome of the Report Card exercise, as well as other comments that were gathered at the workshop. Report Card Exercise RRM distributed "Report Cards" to the workshop attendees which asked a series of questions to obtain feedback on the Preferred Concept Plan. The Report Cards were meant to gauge whether attendees generally preferred the existing or proposed street section configurations and whether they supported or opposed specific elements of the Plan. 26 Report Cards were collected. Of those who submitted a Report Card, 1 person indicated that they live in the project area, 9 people indicated that they own a business in the project area, and 5 people indicated that they own property in the project area. Participators also included one or more persons that live near Downtown Ukiah, work in the project area, patronize locally -owned businesses, are former business owner in the project area, are Mendocino Council of Government (MCOG) members, are City staff members, are members of Mendocino County ReLeaf, are members of the Main Street Program Board, are members of the Friends of the Palace, are City Council Members, manage local museums/attractions, and are Design Review Board Members. The following table tallies the results of the first question on the Report Card exercise, which asked if participants preferred the existing or proposed street sections. Shaded cells indicate the majority vote. COMMUNITY I PUBLIC SAFETY I RECREATION I EDUCATION I URBAN ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS I WWW.RRMDESIGN.COM A Cdfomia GmpomBon I Victor Montgomery, ArcNtect #010901 Jerry Vldm 1, PE N36895, LS #62761 M Ferber, LAN2844 Existing Proposed Additional Written Comments (A) State Street- South of Clay 2 votes 24 votes • Take out parking on one (8%) (92%) side to add bike lane & 9- 10' sidewalks • Like 3 travel lanes COMMUNITY I PUBLIC SAFETY I RECREATION I EDUCATION I URBAN ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS I WWW.RRMDESIGN.COM A Cdfomia GmpomBon I Victor Montgomery, ArcNtect #010901 Jerry Vldm 1, PE N36895, LS #62761 M Ferber, LAN2844 creating environments people enjoy" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #2 Workshop Results Summary May 12, 2009 Page 2 of 5 (B) State Street- North of Clay 3 votes 23 votes - Use 30 degree parking 1. (12%) (88%) • Add a median & trees (2) 1 votes (4%) 2. Timed traffic signals at the Standley St - No diagonal parking (4) 3 votes 0 votes - Have 3 travel lanes - Crossing State on Church going west to east—need clear view of traffic traveling south on State e 10' travel lanes adequate, keep 9' sidewalks (C) State Street- South of Perkins 2 votes 24 votes e Add bike lane or sharrows, (8%) (92%) could eliminate one side of parking (D) State Street- North of Perkins 2 votes 24 votes a Need room for loading zone (8%) (92%) on east side of State - Add bike lane or sharrows (E) State Street- North of Smith 2 votes 24 votes - Add a signal light timed (8%) (92%) with Perkins and Standley e Like the planter/turn lane (even without bike lane), sharrowspossible? (F) State Street- North of Henry 1 vote 25 votes e Use 30 degree parking (4%) (96%) • Add a median (2) - No diagonal parking (2) - Prefer 11' travel lanes or sharrows (G) Main Street- South of Clay 1 vote 24 votes • Add bike route signage (Facing South) (4%) (96%) • Slightly prefer separate bike lanes to sharrows (H) Main Street- North of Clay 2 votes 24 votes (Facia North) (8%) 1 (92%) (I) -(L) Standley, Smith, and Henry 8 votes 15 votes a Unresolved solution Streets—one-way to two-way (35%) (65%) - No left turn onto Smith conversions The following table tallies the results of the second question on the Report Card exercise, which asked participants to indicate which features of the Preferred Concept Plan they support. Preferred Streetscape Concept PlanFeatures Support strongly Support moderately Oppose State Street 1. Single travel lane in each direction with center turn lane/median 20 votes (83%) 3 votes (13%) 1 votes (4%) 2. Timed traffic signals at the Standley St 23 votes 3 votes 0 votes N:\2008\140853 0-U I<iah-DOwnto4vn-Streetscape-hmproverrment-Plan\Planning\Task-B.06- Worl<shop2\Document\Results\WS 2-ResultsReport.doc ����wm���p�p enjoy"U�hOown�wn��e�cape|mpmvment�m Public Workshop #Z Workshop Results Summary May l2.ZUOQ Page 3 of N:\2008\1zI08530'Ukiahommnmv,,in-Streetscapeimpmxement-Man\Mannmg\|ask-8.06' and Perkins St intersections to increase (88%) (12%) (0%) efficiency 3. Diagonal parking adjacent to Alex R. 13 votes 5 votes 8 votes 4. Diagonal parking north of Henry St 10 votes 6 votes 7 votes S. Sidewalk bulb -outs at most intersections 23 votes 2 votes 0 votes 6. Sidewalk mid -block extensions along 18 votes 3 votes 0 votes State St at Seminary Ave, Stephenson St, (86%) (14%) (0%) and Henry St 7. Raised median between Smith St and 18 votes 4 votes 2 votes Henry St with trees and landscaping (75%) (17%) (8%) 8. "Bridge" gateway element where Gibson 18 votes 6 votes 0 votes Creek crosses under State St �75%) (25%) (0%) 9. Designation of the Perkins St and 17 votes 3 votes 3 votes Seminary Ave intersections as gateways (74%) (13%) (1'3%) with special paving/streetscape enhancements 10.1 Widened sidewalks to accommodate 21 votes 4 votes 0 votes planters, trees, lighting, and street (84%) (16%) (0%) furniture where possible 1111. Brick/enhanced crosswalk paving 19 votes 0 votes 5 votes 12. New street furniture (e.g. benches, trash 17 votes 7 votes 0 votes Main Street 14.1 Retained single travel lane in each 22 votes 2 votes 0 votes 15.1 Retained parallel parking 16 votes 3 votes 2 votes 16. Reduced lane widths to allow for new 17 votes 6 votes 1 votes 17. New traffic signal at Gobbi St and Main St 12 votes 8 votes 4 votes 18. New traffic signal at Perkins St and Main 11 votes 10 votes 2 votes 19. New sidewalks to fill in existing gaps 24 votes I votes 0 votes 20. New crosswalks at the northern and 14 votes 8 votes 0 votes eastern sides of the Cleveland Ln and (58%) (33%) (0%) Main St intersection N:\2008\1zI08530'Ukiahommnmv,,in-Streetscapeimpmxement-Man\Mannmg\|ask-8.06' creating environments people enjoy'" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #2 Workshop Results Summary May 12, 2009 Page 4 of 5 III. Comments Other written comments on the Report Cards indicated support for the following: o Roundabouts at the Gobbi St and State St, and Gobbi St and Main St o Bike lanes over sharrows o Drought -tolerant, native plants o Street furniture that follows existing trends and compliments Ukiah's historic character o Large street tree wells o Planted medians/pedestrian refuge islands in place of the proposed diagonal parking on State St, in front of the Palace Hotel, between Gobbi St and Mill St on State St, between Mill St and Seminary Ave on State St, and on State St just south of Church St 0 30 degree diagonal parking where proposed on State St o Crosswalk paving of a material other than brick (e.g. granite); make crosswalks more distinct/recognizable from the road o Timed traffic signals at Gobbi St and Main St, and Perkins Street and Main St o Timed traffic signal at Smith St and State St in addition to the proposed timed signals at the Standley St and Perkins St intersections o Diagonal parking on Main St o Reduced traffic speeds on Main St o Underground utilities on Main St o Widened sidewalks on Main St o Consideration of loading zones and garbage pick-ups for businesses o No gateway features at Seminary St and State St o Retained granite curbs in front of the Grace Hudson Museum/Sun House o Park with trees at Gobbi St and State St on the corner of the Safeway parking lot o Consistency to the Smart Growth goals of the earlier plan and consistency with the City's form -based zoning o No widening of travel lanes (Main St south of Clay St) since 1 1' lanes are adequate o At least 12' sidewalks downtown o Extended road diets o A one -block pedestrian mall (e.g. on Perkins St or Church St between School St and State St) o Diagonal parking confined to side streets, not State St o Consideration of bus turnouts o Trees that will shade the sidewalk and will not interfere with power lines and sidewalks o Diagonal parking cut into sidewalk width o Gobbi St and Norton St gateway treatments o Electric car charging spots o Bicycle racks o Consideration of street sweeping when designing bulb -outs o Gateway arches across State St o Beautified street furniture N:\2008\1 408530-Ukiah-Do.vntown-5treetscape-Iiriprove mert-Plan\Planning\Task-B.06- Worksl7op2\Document\Results\WS 2-ResultsReport.doc 01 ENIT] ur E • creating environments people enjoy" Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Public Workshop #2 Workshop Results Summary May 12, 2009 Page 5 of 5 o No intersection treatment on Seminary Ave leading to City Hall o Widened sidewalks surrounding the Courthouse o Minimum 4' tree wells o Widened sidewalks on Perkins St between State St and School St with no parking on the north side and diagonal parking on the south side Additional comments heard at the workshop or written on the plans (but not previously noted) included: o Diagonal parking also on School St on the west side of the plaza 0 40' mid -block bulbout on Perkins St between State St and School St o Planted median on State St just south of Smith St o Timed signals at Norton St and Scott St on State St IV. General Conclusions The workshop attendees generally supported most elements of the Preferred Concept Plan. The most controversial new features were the diagonal parking on State Street, the 1 -way to 2 -way street conversions of Standley Street, Smith Street, and Henry Street, and the traffic signals at Gobbi Street and Main Street and Perkins Street and Main Street. Many comments emphasized the need for more planted medians and pedestrian refuge islands on State Street, especially in front of the Palace Hotel, between Gobbi Street and Seminary Avenue, and at the south side of the Church Street intersection. The general consensus was that medians were preferable to diagonal parking if it came down to one or the other. Many participants were also interested in installing roundabouts at Gobbi Street and State Street and Gobbi Street and State Street, if the City can explore property acquisitions to create ample right-of-way. Additional elements that were frequently mentioned among participants included: o Street furniture that follows existing trends and compliments Ukiah's historic character • 30 degree instead of 45 degree diagonal parking on State St to reduce probability of traffic conflicts o Crosswalk paving of a material other than brick (e.g. granite) o Underground utilities on Main St o Consideration of loading zones and garbage pick-ups for businesses o Consistency with earlier plans, including the City's form -based zoning o A one -block pedestrian mall (e.g. on Perkins St or Church St between School St and State St) o Larger trees that will shade the sidewalk not conflict with existing aesthetics, signage, and infrastructure o Gobbi St and Norton St gateway treatments o Bicycle amenities, including bicycle lanes, sharrows, and racks o Widened sidewalks on Perkins St between State St and School St with no parking on the north side and diagonal parking on the south side o Widened sidewalks surrounding the Courthouse H:\2008\1408530 -Ukiah -Dover tovvri-Streetscape-Iniprovernent-Plan\Planning\Task-B.06- Worksf-iop2lDocwnert\Results\WS 2-Restilts Report.doc Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan June 5, 2009 Appendices Appendix C: Traffic Analysis Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. 490 Mendocino Avenue Suite 201 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 voice 707.542.9500 fax 707.542.9590 web www.w-trans.com Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ............................................................ I Study Parameters..............................................................5 Base Traffic Conditions......................................................... 9 CorridorOptions............................................................20 Corridor Alternatives Analysis .................................................. 29 Study Participants and References ................................................ 39 Figures Study Area and Existing Lane Configurations ........................................ 6 2 Existing Cross Sections........................................................ 10 3 Existing Lane Configuration..................................................... 11 4 Existing Traffic Volumes........................................................ 13 5 Future Traffic Volumes......................................................... 18 6 Proposed Cross Sections....................................................... 24 7 Road Diet with Parallel Parking — Modified Alternative with Limited Angled Parking ........ 25 8 Road Diet with Angled Parking with Intersection Paths Shown ......................... 27 9 Future Lane Configurations..................................................... 30 Tables I Intersection Level of Service Criteria .............................................. 7 2 Existing Cross -Section Details for State Street (feet) .................................. 9 3 Summary of Existing Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Calculations ............... 14 4 Summary of Collision Rate Data ................................................. 15 5 Summary of Collision Types .................................................... 16 6 Summary of Future Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Calculations State Street Base Configuration Option ........................................... 19 7 Proposed State Street Road Diet with Parallel Parking Cross -Section Details (feet) ........ 26 8 Proposed State Street Road Diet with Angled Parking Cross -Section Details (feet) ........ 28 9 Summary of Future Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Calculations State Street Road Diet with Parallel Parking Option ................................. 29 10 Summary of Future Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service for Main Street ............. 34 11 Summary of Future PM Peak Hour Level of Service Calculations for Signalized Intersections..................................................... 37 12 State Street Corridor Measures of Effectiveness — Future PM Peak Hour Traffic ........... 38 Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah June 19, 2009 Page i w -truer,$ Appendices A Existing Level of Service Calculations B Collision History C Future Base Conditions Level of Service Calculations D Downtown Road Diet Economic Success E Future Road Diet Level of Service Calculations F Future Road Diet with Signal Improvements Level of Service Calculations G Corridor Performance Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page ii Executive Summary A traffic study was prepared as part of the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan. The traffic analysis addresses existing and future traffic operation under the existing geometrics as well as with various streetscape options for the downtown corridors. The study area for the Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan extends along State and Main Streets from Norton Street to Gobbi Street. The Plan focuses on the feasibility of the streetscape improvements and the analysis on the operating conditions for these streetscape modifications at the following twelve key intersections: I. State Street/Norton Street 2. State Street/Standley Street 3. State Street/Perkins Street 4. State Street/Clay Street 5. State StreetlMill Street 6. State Street/Gobbi Street 7. Main Street/Norton Street 8. Main Street/Standley Street 9. Main Street/Perkins Street 10. Main Street/Clay Street 11. Main Street/Mill Street 12. Main Street/Gobbi Street The intent of the downtown streetscape plan is to transform Downtown Ukiah to a more pedestrian - oriented environment and an active location for business, recreation and shopping while enhancing the downtown area for all users, including motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists. The streetscape options which were evaluated include modifications to the lane geometry and parking configuration along State Street and traffic control options to key intersections on the State Street and Main Street corridors. Existing Conditions Within the study corridor between Norton and Gobbi Streets, State Street consists of two travel lanes in each direction with parallel parking on each side and a total curb -to -curb width of 56 to 64 feet. The lack of separate turn lanes results in turning movements being made from the inside through lane, forcing following through traffic to wait. Buildings on State Street are generally located at the back of the sidewalk, close enough to the street to make widening the street infeasible. Main Street consists of one travel lane in each direction with parallel parking on each side. The curb -to -curb width of Main Street varies between 40 and 46 feet with turn lanes at some intersections. All intersections are side -street stop -controlled with the Main Street approaches being uncontrolled, except that Main Street/Perkins Street and Main Street/Gobbi Street are both all -way stop -controlled. Operations All of the study intersections are currently operating acceptably at LOS C or better during the morning and evening peak periods. Under projected future volumes for the Year 2030 and assuming that the configuration remains constant, all of the study intersections are expected to continue operating acceptably at LOS D or better overall during the morning and evening peak hours, with some increases in average delay. Under existing traffic volumes, queues commonly extend beyond mid -block and occasionally extend past the adjacent intersection. These queuing issues are expected to intensify as volumes increase. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 1 Collision History A review of the collision histories for the study roadways indicates that State Street from Norton Street to Gobbi Street experienced a collision rate of 6.10 collisions per million vehicle miles traveled (c/mvm), which is greater than the statewide average for a four -lane arterial of 4.95 c/mvm. The study segment of Main Street experienced a collision rate of 2.50 c/mvm, which is less than the statewide average for two-lane streets. For State Street, rear -end and broadside collisions accounted for 42.2 percent and 22.0 percent, respectively, of all collisions. Both of these collision types are common on four -lane streets that do not have turn lanes. An additional 4.6 percent of all collisions involved pedestrians. Issues Considered When considering corridor streetscape options, the existing right-of-way widths were maintained for all options to avoid any impact to existing buildings. Issues considered in developing proposed changes included the following. Lane Reconfiguration: A "Road Diet," or conversion from four lanes to three lanes, (one through lane in each direction and a center two-way left -turn lane) in a downtown corridor often results in an environment that is safer and more friend to drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians. The slowing of vehicular traffic also reduces collisions and increases the comfort level for pedestrians and bicyclists. A two-way left turn lane and turn lanes at intersections provide refuge for turning vehicles without obstructing the flow of following vehicles; this also increases the comfort to the driver and decreases collisions. The reduction in lanes can also provide room for bicycle lanes or shoulders adjacent to parking. At signalized intersections, the road diet allows the use of left -turn lanes and traditional left -turn phasing while dispensing with the `split phase' currently used with the four -lane configuration. Parking: Due to the commercial and business nature of the downtown corridor, parking is a necessity. As part of the analysis of the alternatives, parking availability was considered with a desire to maximize the amount of parking available, or at the very least, minimize any reduction in the parking supply. Angled Parking Angled parking was considered for only one side because the existing road width is insufficient to provide acceptable backing space. Pedestrian Infrastructure: The State Street streetscape alternatives may include bulb -outs at intersections for pedestrians crossing State Street and Perkins Street. Balance o f Corridor Progression vs. Downtown Destination Activity: State Street is the only street in Ukiah besides US 101 that runs from the northern to southern City Limits. It is therefore expected to carry through traffic traveling between two distant points in addition to traffic with downtown destinations. A reduction in speed is desired for making the downtown core a desirable destination, but any change must also result in minimal added delay to allow progression of through traffic using State Street as a cross-town arterial. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 2 Preferred Alternative State Street Road Diet with Parallel Parking: The preferred alternative would reduce the two through lanes in each direction to a single travel lane in each direction plus a two-way left -turn lane that would operate as a left -turn lane at intersections where appropriate. Parallel parking would be maintained on both sides of the street. With this option, there is some flexibility to widen sidewalks, install planters or provide a buffer zone between the travel lanes and parking. Additionally, bulb -outs would be installed at major pedestrian crossing points to reduce crossing distance. A modified alternative was identified that would provide angled parking on the west side of State Street between Stephenson and Clay Streets adjacent to the Alex R. Thomas Plaza. Main Street with Modified Intersection Control. The alternative for Main Street includes maintenance of a single travel lane in each direction with parallel parking, but lane widths would be reduced to ten feet to accommodate a five-foot wide Class II Bicycle Lane in each direction. Additionally, the intersection of Main Street/Gobbi Street was studied as either a signalized intersection or with a roundabout, and the intersection of Main Street/Perkins Street was studied as a signalized intersection. A roundabout was previously ruled out at Main Street/Perkins Street because of the lack of necessary right-of-way. Other Alternatives Considered Existing Configuration: To provide a point of comparison for the studied alternatives, both State Street and Main Street were studied using future traffic volumes with the existing lane configurations and traffic control equipment. State Street Road Diet with Angled Parking: This alternative is the same as the road diet option except that within the core downtown area between Smith and Clay Streets parallel parking would be removed along both sides of the street and angled parking installed on one side of the street. The side of the street with angled parking would alternate every one to two blocks. This alternative was ruled out because an alternating pattern of parking results in an offset greater than a lane width at the intersections and this would slow the flow of traffic and create potential safety issues. Additionally, this alternative would result in a net loss of parking spaces within downtown. Conditions with Preferred Alternative Under projected future traffic volumes and with the configurations and controls indicated for the Preferred Alternative, all of the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably at LOS D or better overall during the morning and evening peak hours and with less delay than would generally be expected with the existing configuration. Queuing would continue to be an issue, though queuing would be generally less of a problem with the road diet configuration. Safety Assessment: With left -turn lanes at intersections and a two-way left -turn lane between intersections drivers waiting to turn left would no longer obstruct through traffic, reducing the number of rear -end collisions. This also eliminates the need for drivers to make an unsafe lane change to avoid waiting behind a driver stopped to turn left. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Impacts: The conversion of State Street to three lanes under the Preferred Alternative would be beneficial to pedestrian and bicyclists. For pedestrians, the reduction in travel lanes Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 3 and installation of bulb -outs will reduce the required crossing distance, making it safer and more comfortable for a pedestrian to cross State Street. Slower, but more constant, traffic flows will also help improve the image of the downtown as a pedestrian environment. For bicyclists, the additional buffer zone provided adjacent to the parking will provide some space for riding that is slightly separated from traffic. Also, the slower speeds will increase comfort and safety for bicyclists. Parking Impacts: Impacts to parking within the downtown corridor are expected to be minimal under the Preferred Alternative. The installation of bulb -outs at intersections will result in the loss of some parking spaces on State Street. Corridor Analysis The performance of the corridor as a whole was also evaluated. Data such as delay, fuel consumption and emissions were considered when evaluating the change in operation under future p.m. peak hour volumes with the proposed road diet and parallel parking as well as with the existing lane configuration. Despite a reduction in the number of through lanes, overall the corridor is expected to perform better with less overall delay under the road diet and parallel parking compared to the current configuration. To further improve corridor operation it is recommended that the City consider modernizing traffic signal equipment at select locations to be consistent with equipment used elsewhere and to allow coordination with other intersections while easing maintenance by reducing differences in equipment that staff must understand and use. Air Quality and Emissions The most common source of emissions in a downtown area is vehicle idling and stop -and -go traffic. More fuel is consumed when a vehicle accelerates from a stop than when traveling at a constant speed. The increased efficiency related to the installation of turn lanes and the associated reduction in vehicle queuing and idling time would be expected to reduce fuel consumption and the associated release of pollutants. Further reductions in delay, fuel consumption and pollutants would be expected with the upgrades to traffic signal equipment. The corridor is expected to experience a 6.2 percent decrease in Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions upon implementation of the proposed road diet with parallel parking. Downtown Streetscope Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah W -=trans June 19, 2009 Page 4 Study Parameters Study Area The study area selected for analysis includes all of the intersections along State and Main Streets in the downtown area between Norton Street to the north and Gobbi Street to the south. Traffic impacts were evaluated at 12 key intersections in the study area, as listed below and shown on Figure I along with their lane configurations. I. State StreetlNorton Street 2. State Street/Standley Street 3. State Street/Perkins Street 4. State Street/Clay Street 5. State Street/Mill Street 6. State Street/Gobbi Street 7. Main Street/Norton Street 8. Main Street/Standley Street 9. Main Street/Perkins Street 10. Main Street/Clay Street 11. Main Street/Mill Street 12. Main Street/Gobbi Street The remaining intersections within the downtown corridor segments were initially studied to determine if conditions warranted additional analysis or would affect operation of the selected study intersections. Study Periods Traffic operation during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours was evaluated. The a.m. peak hour is the hour between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. with the highest traffic volumes and the p.m. peak hour is the highest volume hour between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. The a.m. peak generally represents commute traffic to work and school and the p.m. peak occurs during the homebound commute. These are the periods during which traffic conditions are typically most impacted, and for which future traffic projections were created. Level of Service Methodologies Level of Service (LOS) is used to rank traffic operation on various types of facilities based on traffic volumes and roadway capacity using letter designations ranging from A to F. Generally, LOS A represents free flow conditions and LOS F represents forced flow or breakdown conditions. The study intersections were analyzed using methodologies from the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 (HCM). This source contains methodologies for various types of intersection control, all of which are related to a measurement of delay in average number of seconds per vehicle. Two -Way Stop -Controlled Intersections Intersections that are stop -controlled on one or two approaches were analyzed using the HCM two-way stop -controlled intersection capacity method. The methodology determines a level of service for each minor turning movement by estimating the level of average delay in seconds per vehicle. A weighted average for the intersection overall is also determined. All -Way Stop -Controlled Intersections Intersections that are stop -controlled on all approaches were analyzed using the HCM all -way stop - controlled intersection capacity method. The methodology determines a level of service for each movement Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 5 State St W I� L I r L Norton St I State St II _j VI� — Standley St y I 3 State St I Perkins St I 4 State St I 0__ Clay St I 5 ,,,S,tatE!,St i Mill St r6 State St < 7,— y� Norton St Main St J T8 Main St I LO Y" Standley St �j r I:j 0 Main St Icy � Clay St Main St W Mill St w --t r a n js)y North LEGEND Study Intersection Not to Scale w i wnaq ai ainq Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study Figure I City of Ukiah Study Area and Existing Lane Configurations by estimating the average delay in seconds per vehicle. A weighted average for the intersection overall is also determined. Signalized Intersections The signalized methodology is based on factors including traffic volumes, green time for each movement, phasing, whether or not the signals are coordinated, truck traffic, and pedestrian activity. Average stopped delay in seconds per vehicle is used as the basis for evaluation in this LOS methodology. Roundabouts Operating conditions with a roundabout were determined using the SIDRA 3.1 analysis software. SIDRA uses the "gap acceptance" roundabout analysis method and various geometric data and traffic volumes to determine criteria such as vehicle delays and queue lengths, and the associated LOS for each approach. As with the signalized level of service methodologies, LOS is determined using average vehicle delay. The ranges of delay associated with the various levels of service are indicated in Table I. Table I Intersection Level of Service Criteria LOS ( Two -Way Stop -Controlled All -Way Stop -Controlled A IDelay of 0 to 10 seconds. Gaps in traffic I Delay of 0 to 10 seconds. Upon are readily available for drivers exiting stopping, drivers are immediately the minor street. I able to proceed. B C A F Delay of 10 to 15 seconds. Gaps in traffic are somewhat less readily available than with LOS A, but no queuing occurs on the minor street. Delay of 15 to 25 seconds. Acceptable gaps in traffic are less frequent, and drivers may approach while another vehicle is already waiting to exit the side street. Delay of 25 to 35 seconds. There are fewer acceptable gaps in traffic, and drivers may enter a queue of one or two vehicles on the side street. Delay of 35 to 50 seconds. Few acceptable gaps in traffic are available, and longer queues may form on the side street. Delay of more than 50 seconds. Drivers may wait for long periods before there is an acceptable gap in traffic for exiting the side streets, creating long queues. Delay of 10 to 15 seconds. Drivers may wait for one or two vehicles to clear the intersection before proceeding from a stop. Delay of 15 to 25 seconds. Drivers will enter a queue of one or two vehicles on the same approach, and wait for vehicle to clear from one or more approaches prior to entering the intersection. Delay of 25 to 35 seconds. Queues of more than two vehicles are encountered on one or more approaches. Delay of 35 to 50 seconds. Longer queues are encountered on more than one approach to the intersection. Delay of more than 50 seconds. Drivers enter long queues on all approaches. Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Signalized Delay of 0 to 10 seconds. Most vehicles arrive during the green phase, so do not stop at all. Delay of 10 to 20 seconds. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, but many drivers still do not have to stop. Delay of 20 to 35 seconds. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through without stopping. Delay of 35 to 55 seconds. The influence of congestion is noticeable, and most vehicles have to stop. Delay of 55 to 80 seconds. Most, if not all, vehicles must stop and drivers consider the delay excessive. Delay of more than 80 seconds. Vehicles may wait through more than one cycle to clear the intersection. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah vv -trans June 19, 2009 Page 7 Operational Analysis Software and Assumptions The traffic analysis was conducted using the HCM methods described above, as applied in the Trafx software application for unsignalized intersections, Synchro software application for signalized intersections and SIDRA intersection software for roundabouts. Traffic Operation Standards The Ukiah Valley General Plan and Growth Management Program (1995), updated by City Council Resolution Number 2004-30 in 2004 establishes in General Plan Policy CT -16.4 (e) that LOS D is the minimum acceptable operation for signalized and all -way -stop controlled intersection and LOS E is the applicable standard for side street stop -controlled intersections, "except where side streets have very low traffic volumes, in which case LOS F conditions may be acceptable." Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah N w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 8 , Base Traffic Conditions Corridor Descriptions State Street Within the study corridor between Norton and Gobbi Streets, State Street consists of two travel lanes in each direction with parallel parking on each side and a total curb -to -curb width 56 to 64 feet. There are no separate turn lanes, so at intersections turning movements are made from the inside through lane. Buildings along State Street are generally located directly at the back of the sidewalk, close enough to the street to prohibit any widening of the streets. Details of the cross-section of State Street at several key locations are indicated in Table 2 and shown in Figure 2; a plan view of State Street between Smith Street and Clay Street is provided in Figure 3. Table 2 Existing Cross -Section Details for State Street (feet) Street Segment West Side Center East Side Est. ROW Side Park Bike/ Travel Travel Bike/ Park Side walk Shldr Shldr walk South of Henry St � 8 8 - 2x 12 - 2x 12 - 8 10 82 North of Smith St 8 8 - 2x12 - 2x12 - 8 8 80 South of Smith St 11.5 8 - 2x 10 - 2x I 0 - 8 12 79.5 North of Perkins St 12 8 - 2x 10.5 - 2x 10.5 - 8 15 80 South of Perkins St 12 8 - 2x I I - 2x I I - 8 12 84 South of Church St 12 8 - 2x I 0 - 2x I 0 - 8 12 80 South of Clay St 11 8 - 2x 10 - 2x 10 - 8 11 78 South of Seminary Ave 1 7 1 8 - 2x I 0 - 2x I 0 - 8 7 70 Note: Est. = Estimated The images below in Plates 1 and 2 show a view of the existing cross-section configuration of State Street that is typical for the downtown corridor. Plate 1 State Street looking north near Plate 2 State Street looking north near the Alex R. Thomas Plaza. Henry Street Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 9 LEGEND 40 Study Intersection Not to Scale UK1049.ai 6/09 Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study Figure 2 City of Ukiah Existing Cross Sections Signalized intersections within the study corridor vary in controlling equipment and timing plans. The State Street intersections with Norton Street, Mill Street and Gobbi Street are equipped with in -pavement inductive loops that detect the presence of vehicles and adjust the signal timing based on traffic demands within predefined parameters. Vehicle detection equipment is installed at the State Street intersections with Standley Street and Perkins Street; however, the timing is fixed regardless of actual demand. Due to the close proximity of these two intersections, the controllers are connected to each other and the timing of the two intersections is coordinated. Since the current configuration of four travel lanes without a center median does not allow for left -turn lanes at the intersection, the signals are all configured as either split phased, which allows only one direction of traffic to go at a time, or with permitted left turns that result in drivers waiting for an acceptable gap in conflicting traffic to complete a turn movement while blocking following vehicles. Split phasing, which is used at the intersections with Perkins Street and Standley Street, is inherently inefficient since it requires one direction of traffic to always wait during the opposing traffic movements. Main Street Main Street consists of one travel lane in each direction with parallel parking on each side. The curb -to -curb width of Main Street varies between 40 and 46 feet. Turn lanes are provided at the intersections of Main Street with Perkins Street, Mill Street and Gobbi Street; however, all other intersections have shared through -turn lanes. All intersections are side -street stop -controlled, with the Main Street approaches being uncontrolled, with the exception of Main Street/Perkins Street and Main Street/Gobbi Street which are both all -way -stop -controlled. East-West Cross Streets Currently, the followingfour cross streets within the downtown corridor are narrow one-way streets which limit circulation options: • Henry Street — one-way eastbound • Smith Street — one-way westbound • Standley Street — one-way eastbound • Church Street — one-way eastbound Existing 'Traffic Volumes Existing p.m. peak hour traffic volumes were obtained from City staff as reported in the Citywide Circulation Study in addition to new counts conducted in October and November 2008 at key intersections. City staff indicated that the traffic volumes reported in the Citywide Circulation Study were obtained in 2001 with some factoring applied. The traffic volumes obtained in 2008 were consistently five to 20 percent lower than those presented in the Citywide Circulation Study. This is consistent with regional trends observed over the last several years that show decreasing traffic volumes. Because of the decline in volumes and to ensure a conservative analysis, the higher traffic volume counts published in the Ukiah Citywide Circulation Study were used for analysis purposes. The existing traffic volumes at all study intersections used for the analysis are shown on Figure 4. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 12 o� 65(154) 74' co a 0 (0) L, y— 25(52) M uO7 Cl) St/Norton St S 2 1 N o o 10(22) rn a- 48(106) d; ` 6(5) L `) t r (8)31 „ t f (6)12 -t (94)87 `l f (11)90 CZJ, v State St/Standley St t` � CO rn rn rn M � "� 56 (105) 207(207) `J 1, 57 (92) CO � CCD N v ClO tate SUPerkins St r4G 1 N o o 10(22) cwt to o a- 48(106) d; ` 6(5) - M N `) t r (96)85 - 7(14) (101)59 y 8(26) (1)10 `l f (11)90 o ,o (83)41 t` � CO Sin St/Standley St C:) N M v v v `State SUClay St 25(45) (18)10— (57)76 o W M rn 1 N o o 10(22) o M d a- 48(106) `J14� 3 (15) (48)4 `) t r (96)85 - 4 ti "- (101)59 y o (57) 30 ° r Main SUGobbi St v ;tate SUMill St v J 25(45) (18)10— (57)76 o W M rn 1 N o o '� 69 (82) �So � 51 (64) a NM r 231(176) L, 106(226) (75) 49---# `1 (184)211, M - N (57) 30 .- Main SUGobbi St o rn o v : State SUGobbi St v J 25(45) (18)10— (57)76 o W M rn � N o o '� 69 (82) - M M <- 298(338) 00 U 2 (15) L, y- 30(10) (6)13 - [- (0)21 -� M r (32) 9C.0 .- Main SUGobbi St C11 cv Aain SUClay St N Sin St/Standley St 9 � N o o '� 69 (82) - M M <- 298(338) O'° 125(158) . J � L, f- (9)9-11Tf a (289)183— r- oo oo (25) 18 -y o T Main SUGobbi St O t.— LO v CO M Aain SUClay St v N ,_Main St/Perkins St 0 000 < _ 'L: 100(108) M r- rn —362(369) N 3(2) .1 0(0) (25)54 (1) 9-"' o 0 0 (7)27 r Main SUGobbi St 00 O I.n v M v Aain SUClay St 6J O CO N_ O C2 M � aJ (62)40 - (64)61 M o � N 12 19 ~ M v 'L: 100(108) M r- rn —362(369) '' aJ j 1, f- 33 (11) (113) 85 `1 f (279)298 -> (3)10-� ornv Main SUGobbi St North NM to Scale UKI049.ai 6/09 Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study Figure 4 City of Ukiah Existing Traffic Volumes Existing Intersection Levels of Service All twelve study intersections are currently operating acceptably at LOS C or better overall during the morning and evening peak hours. The existing intersection levels of service are summarized in Table 3. Copies of the level of service calculations are provided in Appendix A. Table 3 Summary of Existing Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Calculations Study Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 1. State St/Norton St 7.3 ............................................................... A 7.9 ..................................................... A ................................................................................ 2. State St/Standley St ................................................................................ 15.5 ............................................................... B 20.3 ..................................................... C 3. State St/Perkins St 15.4 ............................................................... B 22.7 ..................................................... C ................................................................................ 4. State St/Clay St 4.3 A 2.1 A Eastbound Clay St Approach 21.9 C 13.7 B Westbound Clay St Approach ................................................................................ 17.6 ............................................................... C 28.8 ..................................................... D 5. State St/Mill St - 9.0 ............................................................... A 10.7 ..................................................... B I ................................................................................ 6. State St/Gobbi St 22.3 ............................................................... C 31.9 ..................................................... C ................................................................................ 7. Main St/Norton St 4.1 A 6.7 A Northbound Main St Approach 9.3 .............................................................. A 10.2 ..................................................... 8 ................................................................................ 8. Main St/Standley St 2.5 A 1.3 A Eastbound Standley St Approach 10.4 8 9.9 A Westbound Standley St Approach /0.7 .............................................................. 8 10.8 8 ............................................................................... 9. Main St/Perkins St 11.6 ............................................................... B ..................................................... 17.3 ..................................................... C ................................................................................. 10. Main St/Clay St 2.5 A 0.9 A Eastbound Clay St Approach 11.3 8 15.2 C Westbound Clay St Approach ................................................................................ 10.8 ............................................................... 8 11.4 ..................................................... B 11. Main St/Mill St 2.9 A 3.0 A Eastbound Mill St Approach ................................................................................ 10.4 ............................................................... B 14.3 ..................................................... 8 12. Main St/Gobbi St 15.2 C 22.4 C Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah vv-tran7. June 19, 2009 Page 14 Queuing of vehicles occurs when there is a backup of vehicles at an intersection caused by intersection controls. While queuing is unavoidable, excessively long queues may cause problems if they restrict access to mid -block driveways or extend beyond adjacent intersections. Vehicle queuing was examined at the study intersections to determine if there are issues along the study corridor related to queuing. Queuing was also calculated for the study intersections based on simulated traffic flows generated by SIM Traffic, a subprogram of Synchro. SIM Traffic simulates the flow of traffic through the downtown corridor and reports the 95`h percentile observed queue for the simulation run. Since the traffic simulated in model runs involves a level of randomness, a total of five model runs was completed and the queuing was averaged. Because the queue data is based upon observed simulated traffic, it is considered more accurate than formulas used by Traffix and Synchro to calculate the expected queue. Queuing was studied for p.m. peak conditions because the p.m. peak is considered to be the worst case conditions. Under existing traffic volumes, queues commonly extend beyond mid -block and occasionally extend past the adjacent intersection. Collision History The collision history for the study area was reviewed to determine any trends or patterns that could indicate a preexisting safety issue. Collision rates were calculated based on records for January I, 2003, through December 31, 2007, obtained through the California Highway Patrol and published in their State Wide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) reports (data for 2008 was not yet available at the time of the analysis). The collision data and average rate calculations are provided in Appendix B. As shown in Table 4, for the five-year study period, State Street from Norton Street to Gobbi Street experienced a total of 109 collisions which equates to an average of 6.08 collisions per million vehicle miles traveled (c/mvm), which is greater than the statewide average of 4.95 c/mvm for similar types of facilities. During the same time period, Main Street from Norton Street to Gobbi Street experienced 23 collisions, or 2.55 c/mvm which is less than the statewide average of 3.05 c/mvm. One-third of all collisions reported on both State Street and Main Street resulted in one or more parties reporting injury, which is less than the statewide average of 39.4 percent for roads like State Street and 40.5 percent for facilities like Main Street. It is important to note that the injury rates do not account for severity of injury or the number of parties injured, only if the collision resulted in one or more injuries. None of the collisions reported on either street resulted in fatalities, compared to the statewide average rate of 0.4 for four -lane streets like State Street and 0.6 percent for two-lane facilities such as Main Street. Table 4 Summary of Collision Rate Data Segment Collision Rates (c/mvm) Injury Rates (%) Actual Average Actual Average State St 4.95 33.3% 39.4% Main St 2.55 3.05 33.3% 40.5% Note: Rates higher than the Statewide average are highlighted Downtown Streetscope Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 15 Since State Street experienced a collision rate higher than the statewide average, it was further examined to determine what, if any, collision trends exist. As shown in Table 5, rear -end collisions and broadside collisions accounted for 42.2 percent and 22.0 percent, respectively, of all collisions. Rear -end collisions are generally associated with vehicles stopped at an intersection, either due to intersection controls or while drivers wait for an acceptable gap in traffic to complete a turn movement. Broadside collisions are generally associated with a driver attempting a turn movement either on to or off of State Street, or a through movement from the side streets to cross State Street when an acceptable gap in traffic is not present. Generally, both rear -end and broadside collisions are common on four -lane streets that do not have turn lanes. An additional 4.6 percent of all collisions involved pedestrians. Table 5 Summary of Collision Types Collision Type Number of Collisions Percent of Total Collisions All Collisions 109 100 Rear -End 46 42.2% Broadside 24 22.0% Vehicle -Pedestrian 5 4.6% Bicycle Facilities Neither State Street nor Main Street are currently identified as bicycle facilities within the study area by the City of Ukiah. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan does propose designating Main Street from Gobbi Street to Norton Street as a Class III Bicycle Route. Additionally, the cross street of Norton Street is proposed for designation as a Class III Bicycle Route. Pedestrian Facilities Many of the land uses within the downtown corridor are pedestrian oriented. Within the downtown corridor State Street has complete sidewalk amenities along both sides of the street and Main Street has sidewalks on both sides along the majority of the corridor except for some discontinuities in sidewalk between Stephenson Street and Cleveland Lane. All signalized intersections have crosswalks with the crossing controlled by a pedestrian phase supported by a pedestrian push button and crossing indicator lights. Most unsignalized intersections have marked crosswalks; however, none of these intersections have advanced warning systems, so pedestrians crossing State Street must cross four lanes of traffic plus two parking lanes without any refuge area or traffic control. Some intersections have an in -street paddle sign reminding drivers to yield to pedestrians. Existing Transit Facilities Ukiah is served by the Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA), which provides fixed route bus service throughout Mendocino County with some connections to Sonoma County to the south. Additional paratransit, or "dial -a -ride" service is provided by MTA for senior citizens and disabled persons. Two fixed Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 16 bus routes, Route 7 — Jitney and Route 9 — Local, both operate in Ukiah and have stops within the downtown corridor; however, none of these stops are designated as transfer points. Busses run for the entire length of State Street within the study area and along Main Street north of Perkins Street. Additionally, busses run on the cross streets of Standley Street, Perkins Street and Gobbi Street. Parking On -street parallel parking is provided on both sides of State Street and Main Street for the majority of the study corridor with most segments having a two-hour limit during the day. On -street parking within the downtown corridor is currently free. Many of the side streets also have on -street parallel parking and there are City -operated parking lots in the vicinity of the downtown corridor. Most City -operated parking lots offer monthly permit parking, but a limited number of these permits are issued and there is often a waiting list of people wishing to purchase a permit. Under existing conditions with parallel parking available on State Street between Clay Street and Smith Street, there are an estimated 57 on -street parking spaces available as indicated by field data collected for the Downtown Ukiah Parking Improvement Study completed by W -Trans in April 2008. Commercial Loading and Unloading Since many businesses located within the downtown corridor require loading and unloading of goods from delivery trucks, marked loading zones are located throughout the downtown corridor. These zones restrict general parking part or all of the day and are marked with yellow curb painting and signs. Side streets may also be used for loading and unloading as it is less disruptive to traffic. Additionally, some stores have parking lots located along the back, which can also be used for loading and unloading purposes. Future Traffic Volumes Future year traffic volumes for analysis of conditions for the year 2030 were based upon the traffic model projections for the Form Based Code that was prepared by Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants. These model projections include traffic volumes based on existing land uses as well as projected future development under existing General Plan policies. The model -generated link volumes for roads within the downtown corridor were converted to turning movements based on a distribution of existing intersection movements. Some of the minor downtown intersections were not included in the traffic model, so for these intersections the volumes were based on existing traffic volumes that were adjusted to be consistent with adjacent intersections. These projected future year traffic volumes are shown on Figure S. Future Intersection Level of Service Based on projected future traffic volumes, and assuming no changes to geometrics or controls, all of the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably at LOS C or better overall as well as on minor movements during the morning and evening peak hours. Table 6 provides a summary of peak hour LOS for all study intersections and copies of the calculations are provided in Appendix C. While some approaches operate with delay indicative of LOS E or F, the City's standard only applies to the overall operation of the intersection. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 17 151(202) CO 0 F 0 (0) 1, 55 (59) � o N M 'cY St/Norton St r L. a LO L v m LO 8(106) LO C 9 (7) `- 1- 7 (15) (8)32 " f (6)12, 1 t r (102)91 cm C\j �=, (85)46 (85)46 C= -v State State St/Standley St o ion v 6) 00M to 'r: M o 67 (105) M *1�44, 07(207) 7 (94) CD �r MM00 cv N M_ tate St/Perkins St /4 a 6) N c0 m MCS 8(106) CD 9 (7) `- 1- 7 (15) *j � 14(37) (1)10 1 t r 12)98-3- (12)98— cm C\j �=, (85)46 (85)46 C° State St/Gobbi St o ion v State St/Clay St 27(48) 12(11) (18)12— (68)92 18)12 (68)92 Nd GO 7 N Main Morton St M a 6) N c0 10(23) M * to(Pi 8(106) tJ LD (15) (51)43(96)85, 106(243) (77) 65---+ `1 (105)60 LO (61) 30---+ O) " `- CO 0 c 27(48) 12(11) (18)12— (68)92 18)12 (68)92 Nd GO 7 N Main Morton St M a N p 1(13) �n '� 66 (66) C:. M d- co `- 231(176) aJ L, 106(243) (77) 65---+ `1 (184)211-> - M (61) 30---+ O) " `- CO 0 c State St/Gobbi St / 27(48) 12(11) (18)12— (68)92 18)12 (68)92 Nd GO 7 N Main Morton St M a N p 1(13) col o 2 r' o � (19) aJ � � 30(11) (8)14 -J' `1 T (0)23- oo .; �r 32)11 �- c `Main St/Perkins St J Main SYStandley St 0 1 v U') 1(13) col o 74 (115) r' o � <- 343(350) aJ � � ,` 125(164) (15) 11 `1 T (372)231 -> oo .; �r (32) 20 CD 00 �vN `Main St/Perkins St J 0 v U') 1(13) col o e- 3(3) o 0(0) (31)54 , t f (1)9-,. (9)27 j- oo r -- (3) 10 --+ (3) ��� M 00 �v CT CO (63)42 `1 (65)61 St/Mill St 12 't7- 103(128) o 362(369) '' .J f- 33 (11) (130) 88 279)298- 3- (279)298— j- oo r -- (3) 10 --+ (3) a �� iZ_ v Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study City of Ukiah r North Not to Scale UKI049.ai 6/09 ZMM Future Traffic Volumes Table 6 Summary of Future Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Calculations State Street Base Configuration Option Study Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 1. State St/Norton St 14.8 B 8.5 A ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2. State St/Standley St 13.8 B 22.2 C ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3. State St/Perkins St 19.2 B 28.1 C ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4. State St/Clay St 7.4 A 3.2 A Eastbound Clay St Approach 52.0 F 17.5 C Westbound Clay St Approach ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35.3 E 57.5 F 5. State St/Mill St 10.6 B 12.8 B ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6. State St/Gobbi St 25.5 C 47.1 D ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7. Main St/Norton St 4.3 A 8.0 A Northbound Main St Approach 9.5 A 11.4 A .............................................................................................................................................................................._................................ 8. Main St/Standley St 2.5 A 1.1 A Eastbound Standley St Approach 10.5 B 10.9 B Westbound Standley St Approach ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10.8 B 12.6 B 9. Main St/Perkins St 12.5 B 21.4 C ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10. Main St/Clay St 2.3 A 1.1 A Eastbound Clay St Approach 11.9 B 18.4 C Westbound Clay St Approach ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ I I.1 B 12.5 B 11. Main St/Mill St 2.8 A 3.0 A Eastbound Mill St Approach 10.7 8 15.3 C 12. Main St/Gobbi St 15.3 C 25.7 D Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah N w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 19 Corridor Options When considering corridor streetscape options, the existing right-of-way widths were maintained for all options to avoid any impact to existing buildings. Revisions to the corridor that were considered included lane reconfigurations and parking modifications with a goal of creating a more comfortable pedestrian environment while still serving the traffic demand. Lane Reconfiguration The term "Road Diet" generally refers to the conversion of streets from four lanes (two through lanes in each direction) to three lanes, (one through lane in each direction and a center two-way left -turn lane). These conversions have been used by communities throughout the country to address traffic safety and accessibility as well as to add bicycle facilities. Road diets in a downtown corridor often result in an environment that is safer and more friendly to drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians. The slowing of vehicular traffic generally results in a reduction of collisions and increases the comfort level for pedestrians and bicyclists. The installation of a two-way left turn lane and turn lanes at intersections provides refuge for turning vehicles without obstructing the flow of following vehicles, which also increases the comfort of the driver and decreases collisions. The reduction in lanes also provides enough room to add bicycle lanes or shoulders adjacent to parking. Despite the decrease in travel lanes, road diets have been seen to increase the capacity of a roadway by making it operate more efficiently. At signalized intersections, the road diet allows the use of left -turn lanes and traditional left -turn phasing while dispensing with the split phasing currently used with the four -lane configuration. At the same time, road diets may increase the availability of on -street parking, and make off-street parking easier to access. The combination of increased safety, efficiency and user comfort has been seen to have a positive impact on businesses located along corridors that have had road diets enacted. Case studies have shown that downtown corridors that undergo a road diet generally experience an increase in sales and property values while experiencing a decrease in vacancy. This is often attributed to the fact that after implementation of a road diet it is easier for drivers and bicyclists to access a business and since pedestrians feel more comfortable, they are more likely to visit multiple businesses during one trip. (Discussion of specific examples is included in Appendix D.) Parking On -street parking provides the following benefits: • supports local economic activity by providing access to uses • increases pedestrian comfort by providing acting as a buffer • slows traffic, making pedestrian crossings safer • enables drivers to become pedestrians conveniently • increases pedestrian activity on the street • increases visibility of storefronts to motorists parking on the street • decreases on-site parking needs • provides space for on -street loading and unloading Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 20 Due to the commercial and business nature of the downtown corridor, parking is a necessity. As part of the analysis of the alternatives, parking availability was considered with a desire to maximize the amount of parking maintained. Parallel Parking Under this alternative the road diet option with three travel lanes would be combined with parallel parking, resulting in additional road width which could be used for wider sidewalks and/or bike lanes. Therefore, parallel parking was included in one of the options. Angled Parking Angled parking at a 45 -degree angle from the curb was considered for either both sides of the street or only one side of the street with parallel parking retained on the other side of the street. If angled parking were to be incorporated into the plan, parking on only one side is recommended for the following reasons: With the width varying between 56 and 64 feet, angled parking on both sides of the street would provide backing space that would be only minimally acceptable for exit by a large vehicle, which may result in a large vehicle entering the second travel lane when backing. With angled parking on only one side of the street, a more appropriate backing space could be provided, thereby decreasing the possibilities of delay in traffic or conflicts with other vehicles while backing, and increasing the comfort of use for the driver. ® With angled parking on only one side of the street extra width is provided on the side without parking in the form of a buffer zone that can be used for parking maneuvers or by bicyclists in the absence of a parking maneuver. The Ukiah Bicycle Master Plan calls for future designation of the downtown corridor as a Class III Bicycle Route along with expanding bicycle parking facilities. Angled parking on both sides of the street would not allow the installation of the center turn lane, which would eliminate the intended benefit of reducing delay at intersections caused by turning movements and may actually worsen this delay. Following is a sample of recommendations and guidelines for the use of angled parking: Angled parking should be used on low -speed commercially -oriented streets, primarily those serving as main streets. Angled parking should be prohibited on major streets with speeds greater than 35 mph due to potential conflicts associated with maneuvering in and out of spaces. Angled parking should be allowed in urban zones where operating speeds are 30 mph or less, and where the community finds the delay produced by parking maneuvers acceptable. On -street angled parking is becoming more common in recent years in downtown areas. Some examples of downtown angled parking includes School Street in Ukiah, one block west of State Street, Old Redwood Highway in downtown Cotati and University Avenue in downtown Palo Alto. University Avenue in Palo Alto, which carries more traffic than State Street, was further examined to determine if safety issues are an Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 21 issues in areas with angled parking. For a five-year period, University Avenue experienced a collision rate lower than the statewide average for similar facilities, therefore not indicating any specific safety concerns for that corridor. Pedestrian Infrastructure The State Street streetscape alternatives may include the installation of bulb -outs at intersections for pedestrians crossing State Street and Perkins Street. Bulb -outs are an extension of a sidewalk into the intersection, essentially eliminating any shoulder at the intersection while maintaining the number of travel lanes. The purpose of bulb -outs is to reduce the perpendicular street width and therefore the time that a pedestrian needs to cross a street, reducing the time that the pedestrian is potentially exposed to moving traffic. This increases both pedestrian safety and comfort. Since bulb -outs would reduce the time pedestrians need to cross State Street and Perkins Street, some time is freed up that can be used for turning vehicles to complete their movement without conflicts with pedestrians. Bulb -outs are shown in the proposed street section diagrams. Side Streets Currently, several cross streets within the downtown corridor are one-way streets; this limits circulation options. Based on an initial review of existing conditions, the following recommendations are made regarding converting one-way streets to allow for two-way traffic with the intent of increasing circulation options. Henry Street — currently one-way eastbound ® West of State Street: It is recommended that the parking which is currently allowed on only one side be eliminated to allow conversion to two-way traffic flow. Smith Street — currently one-way westbound West of State Street: There is insufficient width to convert to bi-directional traffic while maintaining store -front parking, therefore, no changes are recommended. East of State Street: While there is no need for store -front parking, Smith Street is commonly used for commercial loading and unloading, so it is recommend that this segment remains one-way. Standley Street — currently one-way eastbound • West of State Street: There are two eastbound lanes; it is recommend that the lanes be restriped for two-way traffic. Y East of State Street: Since there is no need for store -front parking, it is recommend that the parking on one side be eliminated and the road converted to two-way. Church Street — currently one-way eastbound West and East of State Street: There is not enough room to convert to bi-directional flow while maintaining store -front parking, therefore, no changes are recommended. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 22 Corridor Operation Balance of Corridor Progression vs. Downtown Destination Activity State Street is the only north -south street in Ukiah that runs the entire length of the City, with the exception of US 101. Because State Street operates as an arterial and is expected to carry a large volume of vehicle traffic between two distant points, the corridor needs to progress at a moderate speed with minimal delay. However, since this is also a downtown location that is currently near buildout conditions, it is expected that some drivers will not be using the route as a cut -through to go between two distant locations, but instead as a destination. This dual -use of State Street requires a balance of progression for the drivers using the route as a cross-town arterial as well as those using it for the downtown destination. A reduction in speed is desired for making the downtown core a desirable destination; however, this must be done with minimal delay to allow for progression of through traffic using State Street as a cross-town arterial. This reduction in speed and flow has a secondary benefit of providing a downtown destination that is friendlier to pedestrians and bicyclists. Arterial Corridor Measure of Effectiveness Systems of traffic signals can be evaluated in much the same way as isolated signalized intersections are. As with isolated traffic signals, vehicle delay is an important measure of the performance of the system. The measures of vehicle delay are expanded to include the influences of platoons of vehicles leaving one intersection and arriving at the next and whether or not the platoon is stopped or passes through in progression. Other measures of effectiveness include total vehicle delay in the system, stop delay, and travel speed. From these measures, fuel consumption and vehicle emissions can be calculated. State Street Alternatives State Street Road Diet with Parallel Parking The current configuration of two through lanes in each direction would be reduced to a single travel lane in each direction with a two -way -left -turn lane that would operate as a left -turn lane at intersections where appropriate — a design commonly referred to as a "Road Diet." Parallel parking would be maintained on both sides of the street. With this option, there is some flexibility to widen sidewalks, install planters or provide a buffer zone between the travel lanes and parking. Additionally, bulb -outs would be installed at major pedestrian crossing points to reduce the crossing distance. A summary of proposed cross-sections at several key intersections is provided in Table 7. Additionally, cross-sections at several key locations are shown in Figure 6 with a plan view shown in Figure 7. The summary in Table 7 includes a mix of both widening the sidewalk and the installation of a buffer zone between the travel lanes and parking lane; however, widening of sidewalk and width of buffer zones can be adjusted based upon the needs of the City. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah VV -trans June 19, 2009 Page 23 North LEGEND n Study Intersection Not to Scale UK1049.ai 6/09 Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study Figure 6 City of Ukiah Proposed Cross Sections Table 7 Proposed State Street Road Diet with Parallel Parking Cross -Section Details (feet) Cross Section West Side Center East Side Est. ROW Side Park Bike/ Travel Travel Bike/ Park Side walk Shldr Shldr walk South of Henry St 14.5 8 2 I x l l I x l l I x l l 2 8 14.5 82 North of Smith St 13.5 8 2 1 x I I I x I I I x l 1 2 8 13.5 80 South of Smith St 13.5 8 2 I x l l 1 x I I 1 x l 1 2 8 13.5 79.5 North of Perkins St 14.5 8 2 1xl I Ixl I Ixl 1 2 8 14.5 80 South of Perkins St 15.5 8 2 1 x I I I x l l 1 x 1 1 2 8 15.5 84 South of Church St 14 8 2 Ixl I Ixl I Ixl 1 2 8 14 80 South of Clay St 12.5 8 2 I x l l 1 x I I 1 x 1 1 2 8 12.5 78 South of Seminary Ave 1 8.5 1 8 2 I x l l I1 x 1 1 II x l l 1 2 1 8 8.5 70 Note: Est. = Estimated State Street Road Diet with Angled Parking This alternative is the same as the road diet option, except that within the core downtown area of Smith Street to Clay Street, parallel parking would be eliminated along both sides of the street and angled parking installed on one side of the street. The side of the street with angled parking would alternate every one to two blocks. Outside of the core downtown area, parallel parking would be maintained on both sides of the street and a two -way -left -turn lane installed to be used as a left -turn lane at intersections where appropriate. As with the parallel parking option, there is some flexibility to widen sidewalks, install planters or provide a buffer zone between the travel lanes and shoulder as well as install bulb -outs. To accommodate vehicles backing out of parking spaces, a minimum buffer zone between the parking lane and travel lane of two feet is necessary. A summary of proposed cross-sections at several key intersections is provided in Table 8, and Figure 8 shows the proposed plan view. As with the parallel parking option, the summary in Table 8 includes a mix of both widening the sidewalk and installing a buffer zone between the travel lanes and parking lane; however, widening of the sidewalk and the width of buffer zones can be adjusted based upon the needs of the City. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 26 Table 8 Proposed State Street Road Diet with Angled Parking Cross -Section Details (feet) Cross Section West Side Center East Side Est. ROW Side Park Bike/ Travel Travel Bike/ Park Side walk Shldr Shldr walk South of Henry St 8 7 2 1 x I I 1 x I I 1 x 1 1 2 7 10 82 North of Smith St 13.5 - 2 1 x I I 1 x I I 1 x 1 1 4 16 13.5 80 South of Smith St 13.5 16 4 I x I I 1 x I I 1 x 1 1 2 - 13.5 79.5 North of Perkins St 14.5 - 2 1 x I I 1 x 1 1 1 x 1 1 4 16 14.5 80 South of Perkins St 15.5 16 4 I x l l I x l l 1 x 1 1 2 - 15.5 84 South of Church St 14 - 2 1 x I I 1 x I I 1 x 1 1 4 16 14 80 South of Clay St 12.5 8 2 I x I I l x I I 1 x 1 1 4 16 12.5 78 South of Seminary Ave 1 9.5 1 7 1 2 1 1 x 1 1 I 1 x 1 1 I I x l l 1 2 1 7 9.5 70 Note: Est. = Estimated Main Street Main Street with Modified Intersection Control The alternative for Main Street includes maintenance of a single travel lane in each direction with parallel parking, but reduction of the lane width to ten feet to accommodate a five-foot wide Class II Bicycle Lane in each direction. Additionally, the intersection of Main Street/Gobbi Street was studied as either a signalized intersection or with a roundabout, and the intersection of Main Street/Perkins Street was studied as a signalized intersection. A roundabout at Main Street/Perkins Street was previously ruled out because of the lack of necessary right-of-way. For both intersections, lane adjustments where made to allow for a shared through/right-turn lane and dedicated left -turn lane where appropriate. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 28 Corridor Alternatives Analysis Future traffic conditions along State Street through the downtown corridor were analyzed based on two alternative lane configuration and intersection control options for State Street and one alternative lane configuration and intersection control option for Main Street, as described below. The alternatives for Main Street and State Street were each studied independent of the other street. General recommendations are also provided which should be considered in the implementation of any option. All options were compared to future operation of the intersections under their existing configurations. State Street Road Diet with Parallel Parking This road diet alternative would reduce the current two through lanes in each direction to a single travel lane in each direction plus a two-way left -turn lane that would operate as a left -turn lane at intersections where appropriate, as shown in Figure 9. Parallel parking would be maintained on both sides of the street. With this alternative, there is some flexibility to widen sidewalks or provide a buffer zone between the travel lanes and parking. Additionally, bulb -outs would be installed at major pedestrian crossing points to reduce the crossing distance. Future Traffic Operations Based on projected future traffic volumes and configurations resulting from the road diet implementation, all of the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably at LOS C or better during the morning and evening peak hours. Table 9 provides a summary of these calculations and copies are provided in Appendix E. Summary of Future Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Calculations State Street Road Diet with Parallel Parking Option Study Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS I. State StlNorton St 10.9 B 10.3 B 2. State St/Standley St 6.7 A 5.9 A ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3. State St/Perkins St 22.0 C 27.9 C ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4. State St/Clay St 3.9 A 2.3 A Eastbound Clay St Approach 24.7 C 17.6 C Westbound Clay St Approach ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20.6 C 31.0 D 5. State St/Mill St 19.4 B 18.9 B . ............................................ 6. State StlGobbi St 1 22.7 C 1 33.1 C Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 29 State St w d L Norton St State St I Standley St Ir 3State St _ � L J Perkins St I 4 State St Clay St 5 State St Mill It <7— 7� Norton St --1 �F — Main St 1$ Main St L Standley St Main It Perkins St Main St J+ LO —4 Clay St 61 +F +y w-transp Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study Figure 9 City of Ukiah Future Lane Configurations Proposed Bicycle Facilities A buffer zone designated with a white edgeline stripe between the parking lane and travel lane will provide some space for bicyclists to ride outside of the flow of traffic; however, this buffer zone will not be wide enough to accommodate a Class 11 Bicycle Lane. Because of this additional buffer zone, it is recommended that State Street within the downtown corridor be identified as a Class III Bicycle Route. Safety Assessment While it is impossible to predict future collision rates based upon geometric modifications, general trends can be expected. By creating left -turn lanes at intersections and a two -way -left -turn lane between intersections, a driver waiting to turn left will not be obstructing through traffic. This reduces the likelihood of rear -end collisions caused by another driver not expecting a stopped vehicle in the through lane. Additionally, this reduces the possibilities of a driver making an unsafe lane change to avoid delay associated with another vehicle obstructing the through lane while waiting to turn left. This improvement in safety is evident by the fact that the statewide average collision rate for four -lane roads is more than double that for a three -lane facility. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Impacts Both State Street alternatives result in a reduction of travel lanes that would benefit pedestrian and bicyclist traffic. For pedestrians, the reduction in travel lanes and installation of bulb -outs would reduce the required crossing distance for a pedestrian, making it safer and more comfortable for a pedestrian to cross State Street. Slower, but more constant traffic flows would also help improve the image of the downtown as a pedestrian environment. For bicyclists, the additional buffer zone provided adjacent to the parking would provide some space for riding that is slightly separated from traffic. Also, the slower speeds would increase comfort and safety for bicyclists. Parking Impacts Impacts to parking within the downtown corridor are expected to be minimal under this alternative. The conversion of some one-way cross -streets to two-way streets will result in a loss of some parking spaces. Additionally, the installation of bulb -outs at intersections will result in the loss of some parking spaces along State Street. Queuing As with existing conditions, under projected future volumes queuing is expected to extend beyond mid - block, and in some instances beyond the adjacent intersection. While this is projected for both the existing lane configuration and road diet configuration, queuing is generally less of a problem with the road diet configuration because turning vehicles stack in a turn lane so do not cause delay for vehicles in the through lane while with the current split phase stacking occurs in the through lane and affects through traffic. State Street (toad Diet with Angled Parking This alternative is very similar to the road diet with parallel parking alternative in the sense that the existing four lanes would be reduced to three lanes with a two-way left -turn lane separating the through travel lanes. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 31 This alternative, though, differs in the parking type and location of parking provided. Within the downtown core area between Smith Street and Clay Street parallel parking would be removed from both sides of the street, and angled parking would be installed on one side of the street, with the opposite side of the street having no parking. The side of the street with angled parking would vary every block or two, depending on the characteristics of the land use and any geometric constraints. Considering current levels of service, the difference in calculated LOS for the State Street Road Diet with Angled Parking compared to the parallel parking alternative is expected to be negligible because the LOS methodology does not consider any geometric issues at the intersection associated with alternating which side of the street has angled parking. Despite this negligible difference in calculated LOS, the offset of lane alignments at intersections would have significant impact to traffic flow. Because this impact cannot be easily quantified, the Angled Parking Alternative was assessed qualitatively. Traffic Flow Angled parking maneuvers are less disruptive to the flow of traffic than parallel parking maneuvers because a driver entering a parking space does not need to come to a complete stop, therefore reducing the delay to following drivers. Like with parallel parking, a driver exiting a angled parking must wait for an acceptable gap in traffic to exit the parking space, resulting in no disruption to the flow of traffic. There are negative impacts to the flow of traffic associated with the proposal to alternate the side of the street with angled parking and eliminate parking on the other side of the street. This alternating pattern will result in an offset of lanes at the intersection, which drivers must navigate at a slower speed, resulting in a decrease in capacity at the intersection. Based upon the amount of offset and the size of the intersection, the speed at which a driver could safely maneuver through the intersections would range between 14 mph and 18 mph, which would restrict the flow of traffic through the corridor. Also, eliminating parking on one side of the street may result in an increased number of drivers making a U-turn or circling around neighboring streets to find parking on the opposite side of the street, resulting in a negative impact to the flow of traffic. Proposed Bicycle Facilities A buffer zone between the parking and travel lanes as well as between the travel lane and the curb where parking does not exist will provide some space for bicyclists to ride outside of the flow of traffic; however, this buffer zone will not be wide enough to accommodate a Class II Bicycle Lane. Because of this additional buffer zone, it is recommended that State Street within the downtown corridor be identified as a Class III Bicycle Route. One -Way Side Street Recommendations and impacts to one-way streets are the same as under the road diet with parallel parking alternative. Safety Assessment As with the road diet with parallel parking option, it is impossible to predict future collision rates based upon geometric alterations; however, it is possible to reasonably estimate possible collision trends and Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 32 potential safety issues. Generally, angled parking is considered to be safer than parallel parking because the parking maneuver is less disruptive to the flow of traffic and is more comfortable for the driver. Despite this potential increase of safety due to the angled parking maneuver, this alternative is expected to be less safe than the proposed road diet with parallel parking because of alignment issues at the intersections. Since this alternative includes alternating the side of the street with angled parking every block or two, it will result in lanes being offset by approximately 12 feet to 14 feet at the transition intersections, as shown on Figure 8. This offset will require drivers to make sharp, and therefore less safe, movements through the intersection. Additionally, a driver not familiar with the downtown corridor could be driving too quickly to make the necessary shift, leaving them facing opposing traffic or conflicting with other movements at the intersection. Pedestrian Impacts Since parking will be eliminated on one side of the street, this alternative may result in more people needing to cross State Street after parking to reach their destination. However, installation of bulb -outs at major crossings would increase the safety and comfort of pedestrians crossing State Street. Additionally, this alternative does allow for some flexibility to widen sidewalks, also improving pedestrian comfort. Parking Impacts Generally, one of the key advantages of installing angled parking is that it increases the number of parking spaces available compared to parallel parking; however, since this alternative includes removing parking on one side of the street, it is expected that the installation of angled parking will result in an overall reduction in the parking supply within the core downtown corridor. Additional losses occur due to parking setbacks at intersections and driveways so that adequate sight distance can be maintained for turning vehicles. The loss of parking is estimated to be between 33 to 55 percent per block, with the exception of the block adjacent to the Plaza which would actually experience a 28 percent increase in parking spaces. Overall, for State Street between Clay Street and Smith Street, a projected 35 parking spaces will be available with the angled parking option, which is a loss of 22 spaces, or 38.6 percent compared to existing conditions. Since this alternative results in the removal of parking on one side State Street in the downtown core, it could potentially have negative impacts on businesses located on the side of State Street without parking. Outside of the core downtown corridor where parallel parking will be maintained on both sides of the street, there will be no impacts to parking. Main Street with Modified Intersection Controls This option would maintain a single travel lane in each direction with parallel parking along Main Street, but reduce the lane width to ten feet wide to accommodate a five-foot wide Class II Bicycle Lane in each direction. This reduction in lane width is expected to be manageable due to the low travel speeds along Main Street. Additionally, the intersection of Main Street/Perkins Street was studied as a signalized intersection and the intersection Main Street/Gobbi Street was studied as either a signalized intersection or with a roundabout. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 33 Future Traffic Operation Based on projected future traffic volumes and with the modified controls at two of the study intersections, all of the study intersections on Main Street are expected to operate acceptably at LOS C or better during the morning and evening peak hours. Table 10 provides a summary of these results and copies of the calculations are provided in Appendix E. Summary of Future Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service for Main Street Study Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS 7. Main St/Norton St 4.3 A 8.0 A Northbound Main St Approach 9.5 A 11.4 B .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8. Main St/Standley St 2.5 A 1.1 A Eastbound Standley St Approach 10.5 8 10.9 B Westbound Standley St Approach ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10.8 B 12.6 B 9. Main St/Perkins St (signalized) .............................................................................................................._.................................................................................. 22.2 C 29.2 . C 10. Main St/Clay St 2.3 A 1.1 A Eastbound Clay St Approach 11.9 B 18.4 C Westbound Clay St Approach . 11.1 B 12.5 B .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11. Main St/Mill St 2.8 A 3.0 A Eastbound Mill St Approach ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10.7 B 15.3 C 12. Main St/Gobbi St (signalized) 19.2 1 B 24.7 C Main St/Gobbi St (roundabout) 6.9 A 9.2 A Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service Bicycle Impacts By creating Class II Bicycle Lanes through the downtown corridor, this option is expected to be beneficial to bicyclists. Installation of bicycle lanes generally increases both safety and comfort for bicyclists by providing some separation from vehicular traffic. These bicycle lanes may benefit bicyclists with destinations within the downtown corridor while also providing a cross-town route for bicyclists with destinations beyond the downtown corridor. Pedestrian Impacts Installation of a traffic signal at Main Street/Perkins Street and the installation of either a traffic signal or roundabout at Main Street/Gobbi Street will provide pedestrians with better protection while crossing at Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 34 these intersections. Additionally, it is recommended that any gaps in sidewalk which currently exist along Main Street be filled so that there will be continuous sidewalks within the downtown corridor, further improving pedestrian safety and comfort. Parking Impacts This option does not modify the parking that currently exists along Main Street within the downtown corridor; therefore, no impact to parking is expected. Preferred Alternative A modified alternative identified for the road diet with parallel parking option includes angled parking on the west side of State Street between Stephenson Street and Clay Street adjacent to the Alex R. Thomas Plaza and no parking on the east side of the street. The main reasoning for this modified alternative is to promote usage of the Plaza by providing easier access and increased parking. Since transitions would need to be provided at each adjacent intersection to the parallel parking on adjacent blocks, there would be an offset at the intersections; however, this is not expected to be significant because the offset is considerably smaller than the offset that would be created under the road diet with angled parking on alternating sides option. This option also have the benefit of increasing the parking supply as this is the only block that would have an increase in the parking supply under the angled parking option. Since angled parking may only be appropriate on State Street where speeds are 30 mph or less, it is suggested that this section of angled parking be phased in at a later date after speeds in the corridor come down with the new road diet alignment. Angled parking was also considered on the east side of the street at the north end of the downtown corridor on the block between Henry Street and Scott Street. State Street is wide enough through this block to accommodate this angled parking on the east side of the street while maintaining parallel parking on the west side of the street, which would result in an increase in total parking supply. However, since this parking is located at the departure of the downtown core where speeds may increase and on a section which follows a change in street alignment, angled parking should not be installed. Center Median ORportunities Installation of a raised center median can have both aesthetic and traffic calming benefits making it a desirable treatment within the downtown corridor; however, since raised medians potentially block left -turn access into and out of mid -block driveways, their installation is not possible everywhere. Due to the large amount of mid -block driveways within the downtown corridor along with short blocks that require left -turn pockets for both adjacent intersections using nearly the entire block length, three locations were identified as possible locations for installation of raised medians: ® State Street, roughly between Mill Street and Gobbi Street, but only between the Safeway Driveway and the Theater Driveway with a center two-way left -turn lane available at these driveways for left and U turn movements. State Street, south of Church Street, opening to the south to allow for a left -turn pocket at Stephenson Street. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah v+r-trans June 19, 2009 Page 35 State Street, north of Henry Street, which could act as a gateway treatment in lieu of angled parking at this location. Corridor Analysis In addition to analyzing individual intersections, the operation of the downtown corridor as a whole was considered. This corridor analysis includes the interaction of each study intersection as well as intermediate intersections which were not studied in individual detail. This interaction of the intersections can be important when considering how closely spaced many intersections are within the downtown corridor. Corridor performance can be greatly affected by lane configuration as well as the type and programming of the traffic signal controller equipment. Signal Controller Equipment To further improve corridor operation it is recommended that the City consider modernization of traffic signal equipment at the intersections of State Street/Perkins Street and State Street/Standley Street. These intersections are currently controlled by equipment manufactured by Multisonics. While the Multisonics equipment will likely be able to accommodate the necessary detection equipment, the wiring of such equipment is custom for each intersection, therefore making installation of new equipment to be labor intensive and potentially requiring some expensive additional parts. Because of the potentially high cost of upgrading the current system, it is likely that replacing the equipment with Model 170 controllers would have a similar cost while providing additional benefits. Use of Model 170 controllers would make these intersections compatible and consistent with equipment at other intersections in the downtown corridor, which would allow for coordination with other intersections while easing maintenance by reducing differences in equipment that staff must understand and use. Future p.m. peak hour traffic volumes were used to evaluate operation of the signalized intersections with both the existing signal equipment and with modified signal equipment that includes detection at all intersections and coordination with adjacent intersections. As shown in Table 11, the modified signals would generally be expected to operate better with less delay than would be experienced using the existing equipment. Copies of the LOS calculations with the signal modifications are provided in Appendix F. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 36 Table I 1 Summary of Future PM Peak Hour Level of Service Calculations for Signalized Intersections Study Intersection Existing Equipment Signal Modifications Delay LOS Delay LOS I. State St/Norton St 10.3 B 10.0 B 2. State St/Standley St 5.9 A 4.5 A 3. State St/Perkins St 27.9 C 26.5 C 5. State St/Mill St 18.9 B 16.0 B 6. State St/Gobbi St 33.1 C 30.8 C 9. Main St/Perkins St 29.2 C 20.8 C 12. Main St/Gobbi St 24.7 C 21.8 C Notes: Delay is measured in average seconds per vehicle; LOS = Level of Service Corridor Performance In addition to evaluating the performance of individual intersections, the performance of the corridor as a whole was evaluated. Data such as delay, fuel consumption and emissions were considered when evaluating the change in corridor performance. These measures of effectiveness were considered for future p.m. peak hour conditions on State Street with the proposed road diet with parallel parking with existing signal equipment, and the proposed road diet with parallel parking with signal equipment upgrades, both of which were compared to future traffic volumes with the existing lane configuration. Despite a reduction from four lanes to three, overall the corridor is expected to perform better under the road diet with parallel parking proposal, even without the upgrades to signal equipment. The improvements in corridor performance increase when the signal equipment is upgraded to provide vehicle detection and coordination. Corridor performance results are summarized in Table 12 and full details are provided in Appendix G. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 37 Table 12 State Street Corridor Measures of Effectiveness — Future PM Peak Hour Traffic Measure of Effectiveness Existing Lane Configuration Road Diet with Existing Signal Equipment Change* Road Diet with Signal Equipment Upgrades Change* Total Delay (hours) 59 51 13.6% 46 22.0% Average Speed (mph) 14 15 7.1% 16 14.3% Fuel Consumed (gallon) 141 133 5.7% 130 7.8% Fuel Economy (mpg) 11.5 12.3 7.0% 12.5 8.7% CO Emissions (kg) 9.88 9.27 6.2% 9.10 7.9% NOx Emissions (kg) 1.92 1.80 6.2% 1.77 7.9% VOC Emissions (kg) 2.29 2.15 6.2% 2.11 7.9% Note: * Change reported as a percentage improvement compared to the existing lane configuration Air Oualitv and Emissions The use of personal vehicles is considered to be one of the leading contributors of pollution believed to be causing global climate change, including greenhouse gases. Transportation policy decisions greatly affect the number and character of personal vehicle trips made. Within a downtown corridor with characteristics such as State Street in Ukiah, the common cause of an increase in emissions is vehicle idling and stop -and - go -traffic caused by queuing. When a vehicle accelerates from a complete stop, more fuel is generally consumed than when a vehicle is traveling at a constant speed. Additionally, when a vehicle is idling, fuel is being consumed without the vehicle traveling. In addition to fuel consumption, the Synchro model used to analyze the downtown corridor also reports data on Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Common byproducts of the internal combustion engine used for vehicles, NOx is considered to be a greenhouse gas and CO and VOC are also known to diminish air quality. As a byproduct of combustion, the amount of these pollutants released is directly proportionate to fuel consumption. Due to the increased efficiency related to the installation of turn lanes and the associated reduction in vehicle queuing and idling time, the corridor would be expected to experience an overall reduction in fuel consumption and the associated release in these pollutants. These improvements in corridor performance increase with the upgrades to traffic signal equipment. During the p.m. peak the corridor is expected to experience a 6.2 percent decrease in CO, NOx and VOC emissions under the proposed road diet with parallel parking; this increases to an 7.9 percent decrease if equipment upgrades are completed at all signalized intersections. Details of the fuel consumption and emissions data are available in Appendix G and summary corridor performance data is provided in Table 12. Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 38 Study Participants Principal -in -Charge: Project Engineer: Senior Planner: Graphics: Report Review: References Study Participants and References Steve Weinberger, P.E., PTOE Tony Henderson, E.I.T. Zachary Matley, AICP Deborah Dunn Dalene J. Whitlock, P.E., PTOE Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 City of Ukiah General Plan Growth Management Program, City of Ukiah, 2004 City of Ukiah Citywide Circulation Study, Omni -Means, 2007 Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), California Highway Patrol, 2003-2007 Mendocino Transit Authority, http://www.4mta.org/schedules.htmi Downtown Ukiah Parking Improvement Study, Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc., 2008 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, City of Ukiah, 1999 UK1049 /-VV ESS/�0 W£�41, ,��� w Q_ TR001440 +� CO Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 19, 2009 Page 39 Appendix A Existing Level of Service Calculations Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah June 2009 w -trans .0 �a a „ cn w G r�LCff G Amy rQ�0..0 �0� 0:06CR00� 0> n O�Ln LO :OO VOO W N �[OON N [p N m �j`'� C H'C —n t•5� O'er 0• r r � G ap C �R 1"" �C tG o Q � C O.4� OO � � � (mn mG Trn o O, S c 41 ca N (� o Cis i.y C m .- w• C �.G O O „, G a co C N ✓ ��0..00OT�4L1}t... K>Q CO....��0� O^®OQ^ '�va,g ,�;gLn�rn�rnanOo o cc�vo0 rn C rzts Qs UZ mFM a a � O Ems' ���m 4+�?' EeJ. co � a ga '. Y r ¢ O Q E Lx F, �y �. f p 00o O N' D o 0� C O R �. Lii �- • O O L V O O O O W N O o m N CO £, C J .,% O1 E$ .w Ef, W Op O X11 O 0 O V 7Lp Q� R LV N O O O O a7 ' � Wm— N tp CO Q iV 4 fh R O� tLJ �R}O i O C CO O O o �m< oa N N V6 ti Gt U q/ m'y.Oo.OoTomvN a mosk�+. $gc�Fcr%. , N Ode, �p Cg �€ gtym gyaa c�''cd ga•�gg�. �o i StiE m V- I Hill Lt Ui ¢[6000>SSAOA OOi OHO AO OONOAN NO �[]StryoU 6U t A fn NO C�iN00. U pQ:. � G w. ONY o . to Si Q, A�} ON9Oto OC•lAf tp O)I�N� +q0O .OIN e0�OM Am g O tI� GaS OOO^OT O. OG O � e,a0-. O_ w sh W 4 'O 4. O O• S 6 : � ,�0� OAS m Q� KP O V `: In ' V O O N O• N O O m S ^ � R1 f+ m � �". o c ON'RP. 6� m RS QTc fnC 'F 3T��,�rn�Up. p-gDgy_: a� g.f0 H9 eu d =��� k �% fo � mTv��E ==�Yo a> m L !44 1� 2fV 1:1RM ua�Aura voE-(-L 92 c¢w¢ �>>Hs 92 fCSi. t o S, d S� p pcc! Q%a �NoO �O', GOi 4O SOEWO Oa tN[SO r� �r0^� Q�NUNU CId Is fn 0 O O �� �iSR.:OSOOi :SMOM C�i�.0 N OCa�01�� CONN QNQgg cz; 44 444... a N = y u OO pp �y ttpp c^ HIS IS J. Y _ V� Um �tSLJ LL..�gp.. U 52 �tS m �L pp'NR V L) h OO T OOO. CU•,•` U pm T C ^ s N ¢moi &�„.�`. s O t+ O A O I i+ W Q N e- O N O O 1 O ti n{ W W W O e- A (, j r.. U A— "W A.��GQ.0G���^V'. ppe Q^Q TN N k4 I p �iAi S T f00 O O. cn N 3' rn n Et p ^ OWE (/3 tWQ S IM !2 �O X43 04. y�W s f t p z ^ QY 00 t['f0000 p¢� U d t S o• ct �, CA zEw` oa ... CL vav LR�g. g N U E.tig Qu' �k ..ull U' TO To €.5ega 4> y.. S. g 10i UO ♦ Rl....� mSROO ? pm w a 4 OOOWimm W tOT�Oi W T 1!SO W OONO -� SO u"i^Of Go) �A' tSS t+'f:Of .i' C O.0 C t^+I G M �G fD O W O ;!9! C t+i OT Qt L Ru 6 Ru / N 6— O«} US ^ @@ 4u E S p T ~p O 4 m O Q S pf � fV pp I ®�nS p Of Oni O A S QWi apD N [HD:O O O .. Q c in � � 8 +/ SS �rnooca � g = •g ($N.O@QWi 4~f.OpiN�N OWfN�.... LL9 O.tON 1 R7'Z.O �IAOrOi m O�m �m S> OOii W � 4f#.S N-63' O O. Q ^ o.:S :�000 �noyp u� l6 Q cf) g e ID ID •�• moi.% y CobCO I&S c y nU' m• a V m+ E 2 C) tAt.�c oa �,���5 �m 4vpi�,...t/mi"J CL 3: 6i � 's W' Vitli�n°1. IL -a '¢watg5'9>> a��i � 44 d� u uSdS N N N N C h 3 I I 1n O v1 o UO ur O In I —T i a l O I O I I 1 0 0 N r 0 * b I I i m M I r :1i l m V 1 x x I x x x i * N+m I m• -I-• I rnGCGO cern I 1nG I 1Dm m I % %+ a 1D mm qm q+ * E I UH i HO. -100 H H I I mr�o I x k F m � w 1 c.0 I I IDc I N•-1 1 %% a HOm q+ In I o H I H 3 1 i twi] O I m o m o .... W# 1 I N O NOON N ; G I x x xxx * + r>a w+ W* R I i mMo000 mOM I mm I c c� I x x* x x %+ N* + W+ C I C W+ +O* 711 b+ +Vol I I I x% I%X% w W N,y* # .-1# m I .i-• 1 f10.i00.-� O •-a I vt U I mr•-i t0 I X k# a r rr mr W t Oaa W* E I U, -t I HO lo.,F I I mr�G I x k H U W >+ W 1 dH I I brn 1 NH W W*# « W* I G I F NH I 1 O I k k •� N * 7a W 1 m I o Uo.tio�i I ,n ,n I Mmmo I x x* k x x* + W* 0 0+ U+ —_ —_ — — — k x k J� N# ro + # W# I I m 00NOO NO N I %% I k X x% I x xt X a [Lm+ + N+ •O I H I I X k l x x k k l k x a x x x 0 * * O+ C I N I N x l x k k x x + N t o t a t 7 1 I H b .� I I % k i %%% I x% U+ # O 0 I o 7 I I I I + R O* * m 1 NH 1 �Ou100 01n i k X i % x k x 1 k k* a x x x+ k* * U* 1 1 G m U G IO m i x x i k k X% 1 x x E ✓ U o k k k X x x a U W# # A I C C i 1n 1n I k k l % k % k I x x x x + W+ O N H H N x x x x O# >£* a l l U r+ i I I 1 I x � cG c c c I N 1 m r r N I c WT1+ •-+s +.1 m I G i HO H I I mG I m �H %G� k N* 1 cN I mm o m + m* N+ W I 1 •-+ .iH 1 I °o i a %om «+ 01. R+ R+ + R I 1 m O m O 0 m O m I x x l x k x% I %%+ x x x* H c+ .+ * * W a i 'O O I M O M O O M M I % X I %% x x I x k E%%% * W Wm*u* +mb IW i kx aXXX .0 > -N * x x l x% x % I x x x x x + a� + W tl1 + i1 # •• x 7 1 1 H b H I I % k I + %% % I •• % x I%%% a C+ m+ * O 1 0 7 I I I I W W + * .0 + W I N N I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I x% I .x .x x% I H x x+ a k k x+ X* + -H * W+ W+ E I W U O I O 1n U O 1n 1n I %% I x X x x I X%%% I 1 7 %% % X% k X x H% x x x # b+ # C C I • N m I •• % X b a W+ # W 1 O H 1 H m H H I W%% I k% x x l O x% x x X % W+ S* W t U# N I I U H I I N I I m+ W+ O I C I tnON 0. O U 1 7HN O+rn N* za G Oi NONUON N; OcNI Wusm m0I UOm axOm p,+ O .-1 r+ E i m N+* T# 1 � W —£ 1 O I -> X # H * C* ro* .. 1 1 N .. .. I LL •• I b .. .. I N 1 aWH0..11 ++#+# qqW*++ mN �AN•• W•• III O •• b +�N 0 W HO Rp, •• .p. , iII qWWmW > 0R: 0 W7R gHNW OC,ro•• .q-NWI aUW+ W+ U C 1 Ir O7CaAUAmOUNt+++ waWWW * + +RWI 0 I # WIU O T •O U V 0 R+WH N O O# + Wi O UNCW W I + c, > C C H 0 -. W O > > z-, NWmam;°i U, 4' 1 >,m0Hpii uuw1 v °4Nuaxwiz++t+#+: I 1 + — — 1 I — — — IOOm O I I f I .-• + a l O I b I I O ccO mo 1 i I DI * I •+ C I C W I H Hrl I I %% % I%%% W I I + N+ W I n ti -• I 1 i I m i rOr U U r Ur i mO I rnm N I %+ aID NID UID U# b+l W I I I t U+ I C Ur+ 1 H[L N I 1 00 1 i mo O 1 x k N I IDc I m I X x HO aM Or W I I I + + U+ I # O I x k H I I * •• * * 3 i m 1 momoom om I 1n 1n I Hm me I x x+ X k x* + + I I I * + W+ I + U t L 1 I a I O I G G G I I HI -i0 I %% I r m I m N I x% N x x x I I I ;* I .i+ N+ T — — — — 6 1 k% — — — x — — — % k x a x x I 1 w+ W* R I I o HU O• -IG. -i i mm I O�N I k %* a b k k x+ + I i R t + m a l O I 0 c 0 O c c l I m U I X% i x% H x x x # a% X % * I I 1 W# + O+ i W W# a l I blbO 1 1 I + I R C I C 3 I N..{{ * H+ I + O W m I mH-• i U H I H i 0 I NO I mm DI N I X k+ ��m 00 00 X0m l I m r m l X X a� m m Dl + U U H 1 0 0 i •.i W r i W C I o, # >+ I W W+ + W+ I a EE + a+ W I P.H i 1 O N i l w O 1 I I I { I0 a H I 3 I 7s # + W I m 1 o 0 00000 I In ,n 1 m m m m 1 x %+ xxx+ + v+ •• i •p O I C •-I + + W t a O C+ a N I U W I a1 >+ + U0.+ i I H H H o 1 x k x k X + H+ 1 44 I fTW 1 R y* + R I W + w+ — — I I — — — r1 OOOHorI I C .i - 1 a R+ + U+ a m+ + N+ a l b O I •O I W 1 0 o 1 x k l x x x X 1 X k I x x i k x%% 1 x X E x% X + d+ a x x x + + U I W O O I 1n W O I E—* + O+ 1 0 + 3* C I H W 1 a l I H •O N I H H H I X% I % k X x I k% i x k x X% # VI t N I •N W I U b+ O l 0 a 1 1 I 1 x+ + R+ a x x x+ xt + U+ + U O i A I C H i M m m l x x l x x k k 1 x x a x x Y. x + W N I I T 1 H W Iti W+ •.1 I>£+ W 1 0 7 I I U H i k%%% I k k I I I % k k % + O+ I % C I N ro a R i GG U 1 N + + + I W 'o + * M# W O I C I m 15 I N 00 N U- C O N I H N I m m N U I O O a 0 0 % U U k * N+ h i o a b I x u I m W+ .V+ + m I w.i a 1 O I I rnN I m. -I ,-i I Om a kOm + A* W 1 k.•i I CN+ + C+ 3 1 R W I W W I R+ ro+ + ro I N c+ H+ +✓ a l 0 1 Inc,n GOcmcu7x% I x x+ m O M O x x 1 x x x x x+ E%% x * W+ I d R I N # m I W b1+ \# I> • * + w •o I I H C I W 1 H N ri I x x i k X% x I x x x X x + W I i E I RC W.1 I a1+ ••+ 1 a C+ m+ + a I I .i 'O .-i I O I O 7 I 1 x X i k x k i •• %% I I I W I x x x y+ I I G* + At m I NH 1 OO U U 000 N I x x l X% x k I ti% x+ a% k k+ x+ I I I W+ W+ I£+a.1+>+ H I W U O I A I G C I m 0 uI O O In I M m MI••Xxl %xxxI xk x + + a x x x k I i x* W I O H I #b+ x + W+ 1 1 1 m+ W+ I G+ *N* O I C I 2 Iq I r-10�-100 tiOra I 7HN I ,n ID ID Io I N.i r� rGrCOr rl'OI •• Ncrncl %Nti r.� x + N+ W OCN I W M�� I UO m FX +O+ a xUm a* I I N* * fT I I + O# H+ W 1 1 7 •• W •• •• v 1 R P4-. • # IIlI III #* .W•i +* qv*+ .. .. 1 I 'O I 0 U' i£ o a •. .. •Omm •. v r LD a W> E o 1 a smo+ a yd u aI a Vro Wa gc O1qAa+ W 7bG -N I 1 * N I +W> UCI O •H n u u 3 I ..i u .0 U W I Ift O T aW#++++ W 'a •O U b 0 R+ k l 1 + N+ W+ W O I N w W I .0 .•i r.� > U .-1 I -moi -.i o l U •H C I H m N A E: W W W O O+ •• + m> R ro N R d p,+ a1 # Uaa I >m V Hpwawk�i I UU W 1 UUPr ,}O'y I aNUOa£tail an an y<Q+ Z+ 6 Gam` j n�0 Of E600.0 �:. CO p.U: p •. ej ��43`'000O T O.ONQ�M ��¢3p�.b 119 N 000.: pQ 'N,..09 Qi C���'Nm ■ O m � m N� �NOO.p ^•�.. c �.o in mm. pQm p..cn�o mn Q w,',� 1 J Ip IQ ® w .QM0pO U T S9� O S U 12 cO. QO OOi KiO O.O C Q . CD C Q O Gm 4 d coEs v�"� n$. .momoU�KEO �. �`., c t g• .e rs �i't c co� [ Q'�w�vs3�'Nq.a.a��.FUaa p.s1��•-�' �'�c.� C. L° g i g O 36 Q j ".... 15 G �; iB o.go. m O 'i E m m� gg t"UZi Sui >9tE3WLLint� mam.F�!n¢wIv >>siIgII �¢� =z¢=am U5, ib �.� voig ms.Nipoo � ,y. a)a�m'. cQa�o+w: ci `s�rnaoo m�`i`i :�i,ous .n o00:oy �.N.-crnNu�e °q Qeo4�; U-) —► E&'m r'Q cci...=�o o.n �"�.. VV eo'.- ooai .am 65 • 1„WS e 's c D F o � 110 O po QC ma�yy �, f� t �A pO�00AONi� �Of � t[f pto N. 000.0 eh '�'sFO C; ci"'�. com �'`,�',.. ' Ipa � 8 -.$ o (11 m U o w m m ec ui .- n m o an ao. 0 0 0 0 0 min en m ,� ao .q JS Z,m'C'O¢mY o_ �' �'mo�aoW O p 0 fn m !A m n W 0 to Q 0 0 0 0 �_ n +r• N N £ry U t g,.y�omg,m^ 0— R-0 N r' to l�7 fn i p d aj L r� m; E. NCO co u- CC ff,,1� ° SD a. U a ahaaa -•q^� , U y-� �Of m _ SEs .3 y L Q J U� c2 a s E €�€�—pE Q IU a o °pg mcooa ro �� '�<:T d' C C.:� � e � OO d. A aAw• G � m P O N � N N .,.,y': •FS Ira o4u,2 morn. 2�` �voio<i'a �� °O•�W c OrO� O Q. O � O' CN t -NFD �. mo00 mmoo pp O ^ s� N A� �� ¢ �bo'. m mOCD 09C m NtC KOi.: t[f RL � �N�O•. ap N xm: Op!! U -U ` C OO..�M rt"f OO O C A O GI N-C]MR / X -m 000a8 moanm m: eM aac�®rna mcc am. voR O O^ OO O N +� N tgi r CZ' vm m AU _T '"jg-RD.00a oo Q.rn-mo^^mrnom e^o oVR�im C ON:� c3i�'."-.3 Q Gi �' uAi � msoDo o D'•:tio �� >Cv. 49:0 O 0 C... O CoA m 9 aAOONO�-tD MOf a -RA U0Ih w 'v co•- `R3': :'� '� 0.od tD OO CSC CNOOMUt. r� " az. � Ids - .0 ' s, n r_ FL L" W..0a'Tom g. a,$i U�QEf7.. E U)'fl "'c 3 LL 3 c U2n. p: c... J U -Z J m U �L X14 �!4 .s Q. F_ moi. N•iC '0am €.. �D E.H.i `p tO ¢�.Li 'j.. O� Oi U V` m m ay aT� .l 2 2 gal �' o m 9 'g m•C m To m`Fd miil- m = 2 m.'i Rd .i_.� ,� OL$ UU c. 3Z •- S 6O J> — hJLL'LLNLLN 2QQI�.I:Q, F-dd.Q W QU J > >>D._ ¢¢ 2S¢ ¢ h.� N.g m N O O. �'•c• ,� �d q o 4% �os=m�,:S rOr mN�<of @ OONO �.O tO�IWO^MmtDm �.,� A L "� �A QOORDObO �D T+•O A A 00 AO a00 tD N OONU 7 [(] r O r V� Adx�.00D�i CRDs O MAlO®UOi RROD RD RR) O OONO Os!• u�°OgM^UD'U O M0741.O®.. MOM 6 W 6__ N N x�{{0o00000 RDO ORD. M O O A C O N AEON �Y'`` IL @ "C cR f �g 0cg 00 �f'Z''ga�o m. c�ir4u�mv��i. Rn o oMo �� ARo mvrm�m�77U 4�m. .8� N {P v E O RRppOO ppp �" 2, m<? R R V NU ON OO V {� U i Q t V � � CO N.CY toD R UU 6:2- Ow3 w .- {. AC'd...a o1 N11o."-�uq2j w0cc¢ o € zsR�� \ tna � i' Avg A I V V R R O �'C:f1. TO TC m 10 5 2€ iS.� C m N U L'� W m Gu S3. =io J>t J4t�imimaac�at aeE¢w¢v�>>a�cvlJ¢¢Q u53S c O O a *7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 %% X I x X+ x+ * a l •O o f TJ I a I O 0 I % X I % X%% I % x H % k x * + o+ 0 1 1 0 I x x l x x x x I V. x X 1 k x % X X% x + I X% k # • H+ m I HH 1m GuIG C ut Gut I k k I %% X x I k x+ ax X x+ k+ _ H 1 tr U O I U I C H a O c O O c x X% I k x x I % x % x * * m* N 1 0 3 1 I C H I k k 1 x%% x I %% % x k k + •• 3 I C I I P I H O H O O N O H I H N 1 HGHG G. -I H I I m m m H I mN I O v x O m x # E% a+ U+ m a l O I I m N 1 HHRH 1 O r a lc o r �* >* C I 1 H I I .-Io I % x* % + N * O I� roOIo o h Oh I x k I x x X k l k x* x x x+ ro* * m♦ H q+ + o a 'O i O I b I I N O O N lfl I % k I I # x l x x x x I %%% X I x% X X% a%%# N* * W+ z a* * O+O +� +1 * + c I I I H b H I O l G I I x k l 1 I x% k x l x x x 1 I x% x x x x k I k x% N..yy + H+ Or.�+ + a+ m I NH 1 E I I UO I o .Om Om U I %% 1 %% x x 1 % X* x a k x* k+ s a a+ + a+ a EE + a+ ul I O H I ro l I U O I ,-IOFOOti x x t x% k X l % x k X x a x x x x 7+ C H+ + a+ w I C I 1 0 I .00 0000 o Ix% O 0 o X x X X l %% x k k % C. 0+ + m+ a 1 o f 00000000o I x x l k x% k I k k* x X x* X + a+ i U a * —_ — —_ %% x # x % I % x * 7a+ +vl+ al of 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x k% i % X x x X X + + o+ c I c a 1 H H H I x% I k x X% i k x%% I X X U '0 + + S* O 1 1� •7 0 1 i x% I k% x I x% I x k x + H+ o* m i m H I o 0 0 0 0 O o o I x x I x x x x I x x* a x x %+ x+ + U+ u it * + < .c l a q I I X k l N x x x x I x x x k a x x x x + w+ a+ 9 * * I I O H I I I rJ 0 1 . ti 1 % k I I I %% x k l x x + O+ N * + o O G G c c O G G G I I x% t x x + H+ C H* o c + — — 1 % X X% 1 x %% F k x X * W a x x x •q7E o l. O H + a l O I I I %% m N N 0 I k x+ x% k k% E x x x + a+ b+ al+ -N 'o N* + ro I I a l O 1 m0 m o00mOm I Nm I O m 0 M M I I1.-1 rmm. 1 x k* k% # # x+ F%% X * o+ 2+ W w m I m • -I-• I I m M I 1 I O 1 H o f x k x% a x x x + .0 %% k + .0 N+ •• a c+*O 7 1 1 b+'0 O I 1 -N o 0 0 i••mci mrr ibxx N G+ m+ A+ + + a+ m I m H-• I E I U H I 0 00 Go 000 I ui O 1 O I a Om, I N# x+ U *c+>+ .0 1dc I 1 I••mmI r U i hr #% F x** ro+ U+ N i I N H O I H I H P m1 U%x axx% o x i 1 .1 Oomm 1 'O I ..Nm mN l a x x F x x% + O* o♦ �C *+ >+* I i H . H H H H I i u O I -> x x a x x x + d U* + z.cN ••••I IO••'Om•• I •• i £H OI HI Q, ..'>H i NH a i ?. yN NI U dU i w.0 Og0••Naq O qa+a+ it U O c a.c 7+ * O+ .-I + a +� I 17 1 1v .. a •. .. a I ro a� l O m aH Io -N1 �oa••al H .. I a m••a> H a a .i .. H m+ a* do am ao+p+ * u+ z 1 o .a w l •. I .. v m .. o � 4C - .. > H 1 H H a I >, u a u l w .c a g o o a+ a+ ., u o 0 a 4 X* y* + a+ a+ + ul + + i� ua I,a .. I ro a l 0 rn .• l a o .-1 ro'd 01 rorod 1.�.�al j .c ro r.� '0 0 1� ',� I u U 3 1 -H v-1 oNH u a� : o uo* o TJ u 'O N N+ + H+ ro+ o N* 0-H O I U .i c E I H A E a a a 0 0+ + a+ a N a l al .c a l a 3 a� N ro i yl I .-I I ro H a s l a >O ?i +� a H H 'O H H H+ a+ H* >* pa, O 1 0� N I G a N C ual x x a H 1 H H O I N c o o 1 N 3 O O O A d d* O+ *+ + 4C+ mr.CS. 1 Uaa I pm U' HIS' mesad+ I uufv I uuw z> 1 aNuoxmmmmr.�ry+ .0 ,C .mC z+ *7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 % k+ x x x * a l •O o f TJ I a I O 0 I % X I % x X X I x% %% F%%% a x x% 7 1 1 R7 0 l I x x l x x x x I V. x X 1 k x % X X% x + I X% k m+ m 1 N .-Oi x# k% I x X+ + m x x x+ x+ ++ +� I c c H H H x X% I k x x I % x % x E k k x x a x x x x + + W I I U H I H I k k 1 x%% x I % x x x x % I * a+ .0 3 I C I I P I H O H O O N O H I H N 1 HGHG G. -I H I I m m m H I mN I O v x O m x # E% U+ m a 1 G I I rnN 1 NG H.i 6 o o mOm I k% I %% x% 1 % x* k x k* I� rOrUOr r l X x l %% %% I %#x%I %# x F% X% axxx + H+ + w+ Z a+ + O+ c I a I 0 1 1 H'OH 1 H H H I x x I i %% 1 x%% X I %x x I x x x% x x x 1 %%% + U % x+ a x x x+ X+ + a +a% k l k% F k%% % + k# x + a a+ + a+ a EE + a+ ul I O H I ro l I U O I H H N I x x i I I % x %% I I x x x x x x I x 7+ C H+ + a+ w I C I 1 0 I .00 0000 o Ix% O 0 o k %% I X% F k# x + c+ C. 0+ + m+ a 1 o f 0000 0 1 X x I x # x % I % x * x % x+ + a+ aro + * N+ a m+ + H+ a l 0 1 b I I O O o i X% 1 i % x i x x k% i % X x x X X F x k k + d + + o+ x x i x x x I x x U 'O + * a.c + + + 0 1 •M O I F 1 U o l I i 0 I U c I 0 U o I %% 1 % k x x I %% H# x% % O H I X% X x + O+ H + + H+ O I m i m I I O O G U0o U U O o 0 X k% I % x H% X X + a+ m a+ m+ t� a l 0 1 1 k k i % x x x I x% a x x x C H* o c + — — — — — c ro+ * N c+ H+ + ro vT+O+ +£b a l O I I I NOH O O H H I 1 I mml m N N 0 I k x+ x% k k% E x x x + a+ ?-.i+ z+ a •• + a C+ w* + c I c a I 0 1 '0 O 1 0'101 O i c 1 H I I I I ooaxxx o f I •• % k % k +.G+ k x% + A+ I x x% N+ G+ + .c* m w m I m • -I-• I OOU U OOU O I N O I Nmm U 1 •-i % %+ m m m m m H+ a+ + E I U H 1 1dC I o 0 0 i••mci mrr ibxx + amcm m +b+ yl I D I H HF 0%% + a+ I * + �+ a* Oo+ +�++ O I m I z 1 1 NONOONON I cmm i r r OOr r l b 1 ••mo lnm c I c l a k x+ X% k k k+ N+ F x X k * O+ al Ola HH Immla P m1 U%x axx% + C+ N+ .. i 1 .1 .. .. I d.. 1 •UO .. .. 1 Nx .. .. 7C % .. ..+ H+ O+ N++ + -H+ a+ E I f ro - v.a I l7 u-.� I o a •• a 1 m a> a+ w� a m a o+ p+ U* + z.cN ••••I IO••'Om•• I •• i £H OI HI Q, ..'>H i NH a i ?. yN NI U dU i w.0 Og0••Naq O qa+a+ it U O c a.c 7+ + m+ a+ O+ , u q 1 H .. I N a I o •. l a O H 'o �-, r1 0 1 ro 0 G i L j .0 N Q b o .0 j I U U 3 1 .I .I.1 m t o U .0 U a 1 r, H 0 ?. .C+ q o o u u+ a+ a b b U b ro ro+ + H+ ro+ a + a+ H+ a 0 0 l Nil I lI a l a l� 1� -.I 7 U H I -N •N O I U a H y N l it H I ro -H C E I H H a a 7 1 m H A ?� E a a a 0 0+ •• # * al + a+ N C ,c d? I C b+ c l H ,y 0 -1 m 0 -.1 a W a a� a H H b H H N+ a+ ro H ro aa+ +� + + N+ + Iq 4 I U a 1-ro7 I mro f9 H 5 W w 6 W I U U W I U U W 14 N U N Z m m m m a�+ zo+ ro I G 3 O o I I I a O Out -T m I N m I H O~ N N N N I k x* T7 I I H I m m l N m 0 0 I x% E x % k a x * i 0 m .+m 1 %k a%kk k% x x 0< # * H* m I N H-• ( GGG C G GG G I ulG I HG G0 I % %# aGHm mm m* i a l bt I I I m I m H -• I E 1 UH I O O D U O O D U 1 N O I O 0o I I m N 1 1 0 c i 1% * +#' w3 I m I o 00000 d U I Hut I rutin I X %* 0 x X# # U#m * N; 1 I `� i p 0 0 H I I 1 r'^ I c N 0 1 " 1 xx H axxx # v`+ T < 1 I p 1 x x x x x w* aw * b i I N 00 N O O N O N 1 N m im m y I k x* x x k* + m* # u]* C C# * m•C a i O I I I m mOOm m i 1 I mm l uimo 1 X X .-fm I x x H X%% a x x x .✓ < * O# m o l l tr 0 1 I I I k X I X x x O I +0a* mE* I m U I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I mU I rmm.G 1 x x# a m Nm < Q a`�*#. ># I : 1 aH" 1 I I c 0 0 0 1 % X x F r atom a; a a* a* m a E* * a* l I L O 1 I 1 I I # 7 Wm C H*# v* I m 1 b01000m O m I N* W# .V I o* * O* W I W w* C I C a I 7 1 I, O I O I �.1 C I O O# * v1* a l O I 1 rm i cut N I x x a X x x # ro# I N # * H* m I m. -I-• I HOHO GNOH I NO I NO N N I I cNm I k %* fOcc9 a m Nc my m* U m* + W* I I o o 0 U 0 0 0 0 1 %% I x k% k l x X# x x x# w O m* * m* a l •t7 O I O I % k I % x k x l % x x% x x l % X F x x X # [L # a x x x O # # 3* 7 1 1 'U 0 O? o 1 x x x x k% x I %% i%%% * N# O* * m I i i N H I I i m O m O O m 0 m l %% I I k x x x I x%# # m* 4 I C C 1a x x l H ,� I x x 1 x x k% I x x xxxx 1 x x x x x x mo w# 7 off 1 1 I u o 1 I 1 # m* o* N # m* * O I C I G c G G 0 c c c I k x l 1 k k x k l x x* 1 x * x x x# k * N# v b# * m* m m v* T* w I D I a l O I O 0 I k x l X% k x I x X %% X% I x x x x x k I % x F%% X * a* xxxx 1 x x* xxx* < wz zm I C m i.ti Nkl N l C m* * In # D.m* *N# m* C* # -'1 I I mON00 NON H x x x a a: H C* m* ro a 1 b o f O m o G m m l x x I xxI x x x x I % X xxxx) xx H x x x « a axxx *.e# a w* * •• *« C I I H'O .� I 1 k x 1 x x x x I x x xxx I •• % X x x I x x% G* u) * A* m 10❑ I I N I 1 1 m 0 m 0 o W Oto I %% 1 la x%% k gym* * C# ># I C C I N N N N 1 •• b E % X akxx x ,C O H x X i x x % k I k% O%% a% k % k # b# m* ro* U* N # * a* O I I U O I I C I I H I U O G GOO U U I O% X I I % x x X l� k%# 1%% x* %- * O* * In * z O* m y# I G I a l O I O O o I b%% I •• I O x x l a % k x x 1 v k k I k X k i U k X E% k % * O 0 a k# x * d* �: # ima#T*�*Wmal] I%% I H x%%% I .,i x X %%% # a# 0. ro # .. * O* H* a I I I I C .. .. I C4 •• 1 b •• v .. .. a I ro W� 1 0H .. .. I H .. .. I v H a .. .. .. aH a# #.�# a* E * w* m* m ... 1 Iro 1 I o m aH I�c�Nl •. v in .. o� I H i Ga••a1m••a> > m• ro 1 G m o m o ca a❑aQ4 o* •• m a a# a* * u* z.� *a*a# UCIH•• W l •• 1£ I H r.� ••> H I H O, I T D Hb•nH of mroGl Ww U D.0 I w,C ro�IOwH W U 7 C a.C.C# ❑# C 0 UU*G# *m* O* w m N*m* a O # a* a 1 0 u1 •• I v> I N w ut I .0 m rj b O W> I U U 3 1- it -.i Q> U H I .1 O I U U W V v l G T .ti C E I H m N A a b b U •O m ro Eva a 0 0* •• W> I C m C I H ut O +i a W W b C I .1 .N H I 4L +� W W> H i> m C m> v H H T7 N N N* a mop N m 0. 0, * +� + H* ry>'* m�z i u° 1 ��mu Ht3 W W win' W I UU W 1 UUmi> 1 Nn3i U Oa � t'C!].. 4r.�i�z0. # I I * * T I I al o f N O N o O N O N I N m I O O O I I I I # I * + r* b I I C I C v 1 I mml H H H I m .+m 1 %k a%kk ut I I 1 * Io f 0 a l bt I I I m I m H -• I E 1 UH I O O D U O O D U 1 N O I O 0o I I U m Ul 0 I k k* toc a m N r m r m+ I tOc I O I % x Nl0 m I k x Em a� GG O F4 I 1 I * m I r # #* m v l l W o f 1 I I I < I I I * # ••* W I * # v* N 3 I m I I I 00000000 I Hut I m G m G G m m l I utNr N I x k* m 0 1 k k x x k* H X X k # # U* a l o f I I I r m I .y H H I I N m T m I x x O I a%% k %* k k x* 1 1 C* m x y I I 1 m l % x 1 x E x x x a x x x * * I I i I N* W# .V I o* * O* W I W w* C I C a I 7 1 I, O I O I �.1 C I H H H 1 I I I I I c l % X x I % k I x% x I X x% * * * # I NC 3C I I N # * H* m I m. -I-• I HOHO GNOH I NO I NO N N I I cNm I k %* fOcc9 a m Nc my m* I O O I d * >* W I C.0 I I me I I k% Nm b I x% E O a o2 1 w I a a* * a* In I off I .. �H 1 I o 1 x x •• I • O I G H# * v* I I H O H U G H H I I m U I % k E% X % * C v I C r O N I D D* * Iq# >* a i O I •• I rm I NlO l9 I k% a X% X # m* I U a I W * U* +I+ m i .mu umi« « i.* I i G Go 00000 1 x x i xxxx 1 x x* xxx* < wz zm I C m i.ti Nkl N l C m* * In # D.m* *N# a l b O I b Iv I 0 0 0 1 x x l 1 X%I x x x x I x x X%kxI %X H x x x a a: o i N O 0 1 w G I �- * * D* I o * * 3* C I H a I O 1 1 H a 0 1 H H H I %% I 1 x k l %% k % I k% x x x 1 x x X x% I x X x * In * u# N I •ti I% N W I U •O * * * O I O* o I o❑ I m I N H I I 1 o m O O m O m I x x I I x x% X I X%* a k x X* k* * U+ . I W.i l a.C* * * H 1 W UO I momOOm m l % % I I xx 1 % % X % I % k xxxx I xx E % X akxx x * # # w* O H 1 U H 1 H H H I x k l 1 I %% % x I X X 1 k%% % * D# C I N mU I N * m# O i C i ulOmOU in UfD 1 HN I mccU I Ou7 Q I k xUut rf X * * N* hI O� ima#T*�*Wmal] 01 1 cNI Hcc�I *a* b I U I * a.*K Or axOI v I X .N II O H* z* * C+ 3 i m W l a w I H C* m* x k I k %* k % I k X x x x* H X k X + a xxxx 1 x I x x axxx %% X *.C# # N# I E I a N* * ••* C I I b ti l I O o 1 I k x l I 1 X% X I •• k X I a I% X x m# I I I I p* N* .0 * 1 a# I C* \* m I N .uz i E I W Up 1 .0 I C C I fn 0 N U 0 N O N 1 x x l N utO pin 1 k% I H H H H I .. x% I % x X X i H X x* x X %% I %% x k k x i b x k a X%%* X* H %k k k a x x x x * ..� + b I I u# 1 U *.f * I m# m# U* .0 I O H I N I I U O I H H H i v% x I x k x k i 0% X k I I I * £* a* I O* * m# o I C I z I G I oO0o0 0 00 1 7 k% I o 0 0 I b% k I •• x% x x l X x* % 'KI% x i a X X x x x# k' H X X x * N* # O o * V+ a i 0 i •• H ,�,� 0 x% 1 w F. % X I H x x x I u x x X k % % I •.1 % % a x x x * a* I I * C* ro* .• 1 I ti .. .. I G, .. •• 1 1 # O* * a i I C .. m .... a 1 m a E i off .. I a .-i w w .i .. ;-i m+ a 13 d I * a* 1 * .ao E I * # m# N 1 fro •• •• i I o • i •. v in •• o� 1 -EH I O o, m a > > c+ wo am ao* o* m1 I 1 # u* * z.I w I •• I H r.G .. >H 1 HH a I T m m l G o U GvU i w,q •• ro a ca o m a# a.1 v a# I til 1 * N# a# i *m*Wma10 u g I H .. 1 ••1 a>,Cmr!;'UoW>1 0 Ha.mH o 1 m mG 1 W uu31 w m� I o.uH C G o u u* oamm G* x l W I I * N# m* v I * a* )a # a O E I H .41 I H v l A v l .1 W .. �> U .-1 I ••1 .i O I U a 8 W N U.VUal DTa•Oro .i C I H m N A E a a a 0 0 u I 1 .t� 7 m I W W H I1 m [ G, H a v l a Tit w W> HI> ro C W> a N H b H N N* m Id m a Of a * w 1 # I * H* �* mQz I u, ."4 I }�f7Hpailiaw I u W I u W £> I aN u , mm[ o 6 C O O � U � r4 I O I b I I M V# C I C N I 1 0 N I r o I .ti a I # H W I m ti G I f 0 E I U o f N I O H I W I I Y H 1 + Y 3 I m U I # m 1 1 a i o i I 1 - .N f •• ,C w X I o I 0x f X v # N (x I o f H+ # U * a 1 l m v H I NYt * b N W# p'l I mHU I a FCC •i t Y I a k I O H I O~ I u 5* « m v c a i o N # U b, Y W f .i roN# I 1 wro f # N W ># •05 I O U I 7 1 1 0"0 o f W O f m E I m u O I m Y 1 I 0 O H 1 > W t N a I l Y O I N om# Y t O i m c i W f m# O m 1 1 m LL# t Y a i O 1 w m C* II t m I 1 C mf Y# W ro # W f W3*w<00O* oI IC•m0 of arn# N# O O I 'N a * m* N m I m H o E 1 U O 1 O H x t N f N I I Y # W W * U* N E U* z,C Y I W f m* ri H f U C I H •• N Nf WE E+WOEI NY •• # W# .-I n A f Y f U Y f N W> I C b+C C i a I # « N m W* C I + c a I 1 G i m I E i Y i i N 1 I Y 3 I + W I a I N I Y v: : M W •• # a o l N Y# f m N W* m 1 a m* * N N N t N 1 1 o.�f ❑ a I a o f + H w+ Y > * N W C * - N U b Y Wf •.i mH I aro+ #Yiv>t v`� U # O I 0* @ I U.Ok# U A E I > m# N a l I W # m# o m I W Y # C # II - m om# G G G a l l a f Y f o o I �# mf H fAE U # C # A x # •.a f Y I b # N 1 I O # O # a I * C# N• -If •• I i s W mU< 1 # N f m E r* N 00 1 m u m s H: >,00 a N ao i f uaG# mrt£ i N O N U U N O N O O N I O m N l m G O U N# m O m -99- 1 O N m O H 1 i N t .-I .-� .-t H H 1 ti U i O I- 1 E .-I1 O# N o N i t oO H W 1 M 1 i I m N UN(ANU Nm u] # I M O o I I m cOv W m* I •* c o s ro f 1 0 �-+•�H # H# N # 1I O O o U O* a* 1 O i c � .-I •ti N U 0 arot I # O O o 0 0 0 0 U I •c •+ N * W # I # i �f H6e-I U f C# i W I N I aM m O m Uc v!Jr •.i# I o uJ m O* b I �O N H. -I titin Wt I # Y # I N P m O m U N f I .N O tlt H � m m .. .c m m••r1 Nn•ca+ �: O q >. m b' m, t WA O >i�A b# I W Y N ro q N m N 3# W« I m o •N w .0 m GL .-i G m .-I t 0# u>ou0A4°aanW�4 z4, Z m C m G G mJ m C O m 1 C M H M U M U U M M O O M 1 O r • M I • m m O m O O m O m U O m I mc0 m m O 00 m OtO I H OH I N N .iN HHH HH I r10 � I N I i m i m I N ; 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O 1 HG+-IccN Nc i vG 0 0 ac G GCUcoc l 6 0 0 0 U I ti I H HH HHr1 I N ONO O m O m O U I M M M MOO M I N N N N N I I i •• I r O or G� r o r o o I W OO m m I � m lO B O O I N 1 H •-I H H H E 1 b .-I o i I O moroi oomomoo m � 3 o.N-I� I •• N NN HH I OHO IO••'Om .. WO'> E1 I 0Y m C Y O Y Wbb> i 7 a W 3 Y N a s m 1 a a v N 1 H o� awwvv W w k l Ync k >°mil-kipaax,aaw�w i in°�Nw m ... o m O m o o m l o m N l m O m 0 0 m m m 1 O N M 1 1 I N H H H ti I ti O I m m O m O O m I H H m O O m l O N N N c� N I r H N m O u) 0 0 m O m O O N I O H m H H I N I .-I U Moo Mm 1 O i H i H •+ I i U. U O. O o 0 o 0 1 m 0 0 0 O O m l 1 H N N H H i m c0 m GO GO m G m G O m l N H I i w o c M I a I I D 1 c cc tico 13c.-Im I •• ti HH H1 10-0 T N W 1 0 .. •p W •• W 0 7 E IC Y i 0r b 1 O N b n. -I b •n n O i Y� m I m>.0 b r.�b O Y mb•� > I i m Y •• �v3+�N�>EE4GGm �`;vm I .-I N O .N W W W •0 b W W C I Y n C C G o o m m+ 0 N N O H H N O f I m U m 14 m U m m O I O N I N N• N G+ I O N N N H N N I I M« M o M m r s 1 N U NRI N# • O i ~ o o o < < i # i # I o U O O+ I O N H H H I � 1 c O C m N# W f I O H N I mom W t N + I N • o r;* a* I ti O f I N t Nt I m# m O m m m o m W M+ U I N < U O # i 1 N m U m q M N+ I N O m # 1 O N H C I C# N CO N W M f I N # W # I # O O O♦ .G f I v « # + N I a 0 m U m I 'ON o o f t 1 0 # I£ o H .�+ ,-I f W+ f Y t I NO om F] N* N* -H Nf I W.a•nv :02, r) nm 4 aM Wt Wb>.a •oq># a# I'u, m ro � N TvO I U mA >. 2CA m# ••f I .—Mom M N o N q N N N 3 t W# I N O N W N 't1 O W W p0'i O r1 f 0# I u>uc qm sq�Caq# z# 1 b� a C O O r N N O N C h 3 + I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 —T I T I Ix I o •-• + b I I I W M I M I x k w' C + N+ C I C m I ri ri ri I I m U I % X 0 # * N m I mri I No NG GN G N I vtG I rmNG I k k+ LG X X X* m m# 3 1 1 wn O I U * 00 o Go 0 0 0 0 * m* I I O W+OG r o o r O r I M I m m m N I k k# k x k+ 00 I 1 mmmo I C# + U 'O 1 1 I �a M I N r r 1 X X 0.'i x x x N* + W+ C I CM a* * O+ a l I b+'0 X x% W w# O 1•i a i I i I H•y* * N* m 1 m.i-• i •-i0.+0 c.ti U.i I in0 1 .itimG I k k# a�nmN UN U# + D R R a+ H I Uti 1 O o0 I I tiIONO I k k Em a >+ �, I aH I I mm 1 rmM o• 1 x. x aMOin a# w I m I �oG�oooro 1 X x# xxx* a« m+ I I N N O N N I I rim m I k k F X X x + C+ w N# * i�# I I IOOm 1010 0 �oOm I x % aro + IG I b o f mom O o M m l k x X x l X X CG k k k E—* + O+ C I I a 1 F F F 1 x x l x X x x l k x x X k uv+ # * + ro+ O + a l I b O 1 I 0 l o a I 1 1 I a ro+ H .-1 -• I m o m o 0 0 0 o I x x I xxxx 1 x x+ a x x x+ x++ u+ # F I W u N I G G m I % k I X x% 11 1 % X F x x X k + U w# # # .0 I C C I N N N N I X% I k#% x I k k a x k% % + W# W I O F I 1ri .-1 I % x I % x X x l %% k k k % O N # # O I C I N G G G ri G ri I H N I m m m G I G ab+FBF % % #+ x # w+* mri 1 Om + m* o+ m 1 I ri tiri 1 1 N r -t O I w..�+ x x I — — I ut outo0ut out I % k I X % k % I % %* % % %+ ri C+ ri + + ro uG I b o f O 0 0 I X X I X k x% 1 X X E X X X' + a+ v b# \# #£ b I I I % k I % X% X 1 k k a X X X + A# X X %%% * w+ mN*ai#••# all• -1'001 I %%I kkk 1••k% Ix%% a C+ m* + D I O a I I I I m ut G* .C* m I Hri-• 1 GOO 0006 G 1 X k I X X X k i ^ X %+ C* m+ F I W Uri 1 mOm GOm. +M M M I •• X X I % x k k l b% x a x% k % % X x x 1 0 X X k X x % + a+ U# N+ D I C I mOmUO m U m I ariN i m m to .-1 I O O+�C+v+ zaiG GI O 00 iOmNl mM���I UOr �a%xX*% a# + o+ ri + a .. l a f -i w •: v r1 .. •-+ rn + a •• a 1 m a> d a v m m o* a + ai+ 0* ro •. .. I 1 +++ um+*+ + zF w 1l .. m •• 1IvHS .. ❑>00 N 1 r1 .i d 1 T U d�UEE III wLN.0i 0WC U a 0C 0a.0C .a +1Oa1b1 O 0001 wV > m u u 3 1 .tiWroO00a UU HN rornwm roO a aH r > D u11 Nm H a w -m'o u a mH '0 0 0 + C +++++da•ma• ++++ w+ v+ H P, 1 C ora 11 w 0 •.I a w wT7 a 1 .,1.1.-1 1 aW w p r1 I> ro a zaa i >°m LD t:, aw i cHicNiwO i croicCiw > i NN u°ozv'~iw.'aiz: * + I I rio NOOri Ori I NM N NO I N 1 x X+ OOm m + + o: O O 0 o e M e C I C a k k ri •F -i+ m I mri I mOmUo m O m 1 uto 1 m N. -i I x x* a k x x+ m m s F 1 U o 1 O 0 0 I I m r r 0 1 x X F x x X W I dC i I tom I Mut m I % x a x x x G gy m+ I O F I ti ri ,y I I O I x x X k x ri +3 1 I UWi O I o 0 00000 o f X X I x x% x I X x+ I X x k+ + + m +s 1 I G G G I x x l x x x x I % k H k x X + u* w a l 0 1 I X '* m I I ra Fri 1 X x I k x x X 1 x k x x x rl+ ro+ « m# u a 1 O w < 0. U a 1 I b a o W W* # O 1 •.1 a O rf# + as m F I m Uri a+ m I i o F o + + + W I m C # a o ro a * — W 0 am# H* '0a I W U-0 0 0+ + 1 N N u 1 .0 F 1 q C O m+ W 1 O F H O 1 C m a+ W+ •+ W a 1 0 # m * N * m w 1 W O�# U, Wim+ +.,+..+ a I log I .ibO # C* m H 1 W u 0 1 C C x++ U+ H I I U a + O 1 C ~ GO # G# N+ z a i m O N # n+ O + u« ++ 0, z.0 +� i •• m+ M u g I ti .. w< b* 01°i w 1 .u4 a + y+ m+ H d D I C m I r0 r o o r or 1 NM 1 tori• -IM 1 X x* x x x+ � I N O N U % x H x x X X + I x x W X X + 1 O 00 m Oat I at0 I m m UJ N I X X+ C oIm mm m+ 1 m G m G G I I m r r o l X X F m I I mm I MR1 N I alae NX x 1 F ri .y I I o 1. f x x I I I I I ~ 1 m0 moo mOm I Nut I Nm Mm I X11 x x x+ # a* I NOvtUUm m l I oUU I x x H% k X * C+ I I rM I mloto I X x a x%% + ro+ I F N N I I O I % k X%% + .i x x x+ + a+ k X x X l % k F x k x + a+ 1 1 xxI xxxx) x axxx + I ri rim 1 x x l x x x x l x x xxx �+ X X X# X *+ U i O m U O m I %% I X% x% I x k H x k x % 1 ti l x x I x k x x I x x a xxx x + w+ I 'i r♦ ~ H .i I x x l % k x x l X% x x x % + O x X+ X + H x x x l k X F x x x + m I 1 xxl xxxx) xk axxx 1 r♦ riri I X x 1 xxxx 1 x x x x x —_ x % —_ x x x * C # x x X% I x x+ % X%+ I O k% x x l % x F x x% : m# 1 I x x 1 x x x x I x x a x x x I ri ri 1 xI xxxx) x x x x +W+ 1 O m o 0 ut I X k l X% x k l X x F% x k % + x x I X k x x I b k% a X X x x +m+ %% I x X x% 1 0% k % X X X # a+ m0 10 011, i 7riN i mm me i o mGG 1 xGlo x + u: I c G I b 1•• m l a E%# O+ 01N I mHIM o( UOr .. w .... w i m o. E i o .-i .. i w ri w •: w. .. ;-i 0 1 Iro m,-1 I uur1l oa••am ap mm m0+ a* l 0 •• v w" •• EE o I E I > ro ro I d 0 0 0 0 •• v m o 0 a W U a C + v+ a .0 ,C + a+ ro-Wm I 1 0 o >,amva 0-0 uro U# a vt vum+ E> u ri I•ir1 0 l u .N C I rim H p E a m m 0 0+ .. + N+ v+ I O ro H C a x N N I N N O 1 N C 0 0 0 I N .'i O O O .0 .0 ,HC .0 a pa,+ O x 1 >mc�1-Ipawxw 1 uuw 1 uuaX> 1 aN Ua,'F.mmmmEt 1+ z+ N h 3 G 3 Y Y F' N 0 Cr) C O O H * I I ........ 1 x X l x X x x l k#* % k X. •-.'+ v 1 1 1 xx I x x x x 1 x x x E x X x axxx * 7 I H % X I x k x + r�i+ mG i �i r71 i Gocccccc i X X i x x k x i x x* x x a k x x+ X* F### x + P] + w� I [L H 1 0 1 ti F F i # x l x X%% 1 k x% x i %% x x N k% k % k x x x * 3 l y 1 O o0 O U o o % X k X I x k+ k x X* x + u+ Y a 1 G 1 1 x x 1 x x x x 1x x a x x x v+ * -.�* m i 1 •� ,-IF I x x 1 x x x x l x x x x x Y* W+ .* m+ * m+ H I I a l O I Ocoo oc I Nm I .010 O OBD 10 1 I mm m 1 me c0 I k k* x x x x x F x x x C*'t7 I i 1 l0m I Nr r I % x a x x x k k x H+ s W s ql + * O* Y Y* * C I I C W I 7 I b+'0 O I O I •.1 7 1 F ri F 1 I I 1 I 1 1 x k I k k k Orj+ * N* W E I N Uri I O o00 00000 I lnU 1 Fm O I x x* a U m p1m W+ a S* Y i aH I i �a i rvom`•� i m0 z z Nuri w m* m* a * a* N I O I O I i L O I ri NN I I I I I I x x F I + Cri* W+ W I m I I I 00 NOo�O� I cvt I b 1000 I I rim mm I 0o F I k k* x x % k %* W+ F x x x C* O G+ ,n* Ua+ * U+ a l o f I i 1 l0 m l F FF 1 1 r<+• m I UI % k x## m v+ + _ _ _ _ _ x # x C m s a i v O 1 O m o o m m i k k l k k I x k x x I x X* X# % x %+ * * F% k X Pv.* E O* C I ti v I ri ri .-1 I %% I x x X x l x% x x l x x % x a X x X x x X o * * 3* U'0* * 7 I 1 v 'i I O 1 0 7 1 I x x l 1 I % x x I I #% 1 X x k + N+ * ms O* s w A* + W I H, -I i H 1 Y u 0 i mo c OO C 0 I % x I m G 10 0 010 m I x x I x% x% I x x%% I k k* % x a x% %* k* * U* F% x X x U Y* * A I C C 1 1 0 F Ik%# N N N N 1 x x l x x x x) % k a x x x x * W+ x s 0 S+ C I T U o f I I 1 I x m W+ Y+ m+ Y m a l q o f %# I %% #% I %% a X x % + - X x I = x x_ X# k% I — x x x x x x x x c — k X i x x X% I X x* c+ C* ro a l v O I k% 1 NX XX X%xXX Mx I x) xX X x aH Xx%% + v s xx *.[* S ••1 + * N Ls ••* a C s N* * C I N I C I I,-1'001 O I O C I H ri F I %% 1 I %%i I I x x x x i X%x i ••%X I N % X k% k s Y+ I #x% + N s q+ * .C* C* N s 0] i Hri I F I Y U I c00m OOcp c l k x l X x X x l Y# % k x% I %* k x a k% x* x* *.I* F% k x x * ro* + H I Y 1 0 I N N N I •• % k I ri N ri N I W x x l ## x% I b#% %% x % 1 0 X% N% k% X * v x x x x + N+ x** U+ h H I I U O 1 O I C I N m0vU O mGm I CNN I m mm I N F i X# * Y+ * c0* +'m* za 15 I 'CS i •• 10aNI Wm�N m Ct m 0 I N I UGm ri m�E H%%% O+ axxx fL+ ry+— * >t * — v I E 1 _ — ri O iS — O r x%% * H C* m* .. I I ri .. .. I LL •• I v .. .. I H .-i v •• m •-� •• .-i 0+ v+ * .N * m+ E **+ YUWs* m qm+ I I v •U• •C• II 1i u1 O •-i E I V U' ri I •o• v O 77O Ho II G C4 •• c, l m S m .. v S d❑ O C ON+ o +s •• 0 W g O q W + ,0. -1 •• N(A '•U• n ri 1I b m Y U Y ro� I W CZYU Y ri C a 7 C d 0 U U s d* N* b s Y + H* m* N m N I O N•• I W O E I H Y I ,> A m FG v G Y I U U 3 1 -H Y .1 j Uri I H O U Y U 0 I G T v ro ro s v '0 '0 U'00 m 0 0* •• * N* H* W H N I Y .0 vl C I H m 3 Y H N O .N W W W v C I H •.i ri i LL W Y Sri I S ro C m S m ro H N LL Q, s Y ♦ H* ry'* W Q I Vas I ',S W UICip W W a W I UU W I UU W,' > I NNu14 S, Y m C I/1 m U]VINrj Q+ Z+ U I I0 O O o 0 0 0 0 1 %% 1 % X k X I x k+ xxx + * ` * � . l 0 1 1 1 v a o I x% i I x x 1 x X X X I xxxx 1 x x x x H x X x a x x x + *�+ 7 I H % X I x k x m to I O O U C 01 G U I ## I I % k l X x x x I %% x% I %% F% x x X Y I d C 1 1 x% I x% I x x% x I % k X X k x N x x x % + 3 I m I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % X 1 % X k X I x k+ k x X* x * * N+ * u* Y I I a l 0 1 oG I x x i I x x I X X x x l xxxx I k X x x F x x x a x x x k% I — Y* c* �a a 1 I I lom 1 I xx E% k x + + axxx « H+ s W s ql + * O* Y Y* * C I I C W I 7 I b+'0 O I O I •.1 7 1 F ri F 1 I I 1 I 1 c l I I X X H * N# !A i mN-• I OOOc 0000 I N O 1 G 1 i NFh 0 I 1 k %* x k a my m RI m 0+ F r N O* W* + In I OH 1 I lOc i ri•� I I mmcc ,PN 1 0 i %% x% N rU0 6 + a+ a+ m 1 1 Y o 1 W I m I 0000000 I c,n I Nm O m I % x* I x X X* + W* C N* + W+ 0 0* + ms I I N I U I v o v G O c I I I I r m N U I X x H X X# + G* %% x x I %%+ x x x* + W+ C m s a i v O 1 O m o o m m i k k l % X%% I x x E x x x ax%% OI O C %% I %% x I x x I%# X * H+ o+ + w 1 H.* I E I Y U O 1 mo 0o mo m i x% 1 F o .-1 U U ri F I X x I x% k x i % x x% 1 x x* x x a x x X* x* * u* x x x x U Y s * .0 I C H I Y I O I ri r1 N I x x l F ri ri I x X l % X # x i x x k% i x X % x 14 a%%% % + W s k% X % s 0 m W+ Y+ m+ Y m a l q o f 0 0 1 k% 1 % 1 X k X% I x x x% I % X x 14 %k k * m+ X E % x x x x * k X i x x X% I X x* + C+ X X X+ C* ro a l v O I 0 O o I %% i xx1 k x x x 1 xxxx) x k xx F x x x + v+ axxx *A* 5.1+ * a m s Y+ •• c I v 1 7 1 I ri b o l r; r•i ri I x x 1 I k% I x x x x l k k x 1•• x x k k xxx * Y I x x X N C+ u1+ * O I O C I I I 00.0. I N + u1+ + q+ m s z* * >* H I Y U A 1 cH I X x I •,-+ •ri .-1 1 •• % x 1 x x%% I xxx x 1-0 k k x x H x% x x a x x x x * v+ x+ m* U+ s vs N I I U o f O I C 1 `� i N x x 1 rOroOh Or C, -IN k% k % I O x k x% x X N+ * c0* +'m* za 15 I 1 i mGmcc m m b I •. m lnm I cG I N ri m�E X X %+ x O+ F I 1 OCN I NN 1 U O r a %% k LL* H C+ m + .. I I ri .. .. I C, •• I b 1 .. I H •y .. I v .. .. r1 v .. X % .. .. s + ai .i ...-1 m* v+ v*... q+ 1 1 v •I l o••vw•• y v•y I Uc�.ti 1 :OE o I HI o a•• al m v S C+go••rovgoqa* as vm vo* �* * u* z .c Y 1 .. 1 •i � .. y rl i ri .i a 1 >, 9m ml u cu I w .c $., v+ * Y u o C N ,C .0 p + * v* v+ * In+ v,* Y uCI1.. I 0 1 0 .. I vS.a o .-Iv•nri of 0mglYY mFCv oYS l u U 3 1 .N m-loYri UY U v 1 In o �vvvuv c d0 uu«d+ m m* W* H e w H I Y I U N I •r1ri O I U.1 C I N 0i H A E v m N O O + Y+ m+ H v ,C N 7 O. S i r ITC i N N 3 Y N C m l Y Y ri I ro O rl m W W v C 1 ri .i N i LL ,-i m N I m W Y S N I S S, Y m C I/1 AI N N '0 H H H* m+ S m m H m C4 S'a"a I �✓fAU' Hpawrvtw I u W I u W,E: 1 NNUa: yyyy4�* Z+ U O O iI 0 0 0 0 0 o m l o M 1 c o m es a i 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1991, 1 O N N I O mU+ c i c N i H H.� HHi HOH i o% m•�m + io C 1 1 b v •-� I I 1 m•N * m I mHG I mGO�O G01 G m GG 01 I G rr I lD �T G V� W mGm W N* # O F I U O I m O m m U U m m m U o m 1 c m 1 O r N I O H I I U U 1� 1 CLC 1 m i N H H H H H I H O I O m H m H m v l 1 W c 1 c 3 I m U I 1.1-0-1! �O 0-1 � N o UOU QM o* * * w I I H H H 1 O O 1 O 0 0* I I H H H H H 1 H H i o ti H - -H* ••.c * A t o i m o m oOM oMOG m 1 oH�n 1 mom U 1 0 0 1 00 1 v`r'i« .O C* c I c N t �+ •�H �-+� 1 .-+o I o< .m.1HH # N# u C 1 1 bb H I I 1 �+ +� v* av c 1 .� ❑ 1 I 1 01. + UN U N W* m i m H U I m O m. O G m O m U1 I O m H I m UNUM U H# OH* � # E I U O I rOrOOr rOO rl OC1H I N m 0 O u; l H � N a N* # H N N* N 1 I y U I I I O N* W I Ut O I M-1OmOOm OM 00 � I OOm I m HOHmm N* O H# q * a l H I H I rn l O* b* 7 * W N N# a l O I O NUUifI tflO Ovt i O mH 1 G o-- T7* m i m H O i m m G O M O m O O M I ONO i m G O m m m O m m a• U# N aON�* UA+* 11 G I O O O II G G iI N G O ** WO*s* : cU H 1 * r G r U m* N# N W+ o m i i O U U 00 I �n I m CL # m* * W a 1 H I N N N I m I � W Nt -tip II * m 1 1 H H.-� HH I tiH I o< HH * A* + + -•a I o I ror GGro�oor I ovl .n I N mom m N* H >,# o* a+ * m a 1 o I momoOc ooc I o�nm I •o v< 73 v * C I C N I H HH .-�H I HU I ••o H # W* C# H 1 U H I H0 •-�U GH ti I HO 1 b G # •i * ,C I CLC 1 17 i O N • N N N O* •O x+ N* +� 1 o H I H HH HH I '0Ho I £O H titi HHH * N* *£* u l I w o f I O i * W* O O i m U I U O O G U O O '99" O 0 0 1� 00 M U I N O* m U m m N# H* NO OON OO N I NON* • O # O* a i O I l i 1 N O# (1 N* H .. .. .. I W f ro U* — N I I I -0 .. N .. .. H N I .. .. I q •• •• N H .• N .. w N - N N H O I C w I Q N .. •• .0 > N .. H CLO * 7 #,.+*NVV*.. ..1 v 1o••vm.. Eo>1 oC W1 v.c Noq-nN am#N* # u* E z.c +� I •• v 1 £HQ .. > .. ..H I .N v ro 1 >. ..> vv>£AvgQ o« ❑* 1 0 1•an•=1 vn-nO 1 W E m 1 W.0 FN*wroNI ONt7 ••I N>.0 bQb OW Wbb>I bW .. I -tiro£\ HTb Tl T>.# #N#N#NOEI Nw I 11 .H Q>UUQ QHI NN HI Um TTNA OTQA ro*••* # N* H ..H * N H N I W .0 W I N 3 W N 7 7 ro I O C N ro l ro\ aJ N ro q N ro N 3* N* * w* U. W# N CLQ C I 0,H.1 HH•nm *+ °* cTia°o< �4 i c°�za i >°zp�zaaazaw i z�aw i uycNioA���oQaN�+ zo< I o i ........... I o N N i H r o r U * a l O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 OOOO I O Nv 1 r O �# * rN U* C i c N I H HH HHH 1 HO I O HH ti *# * o O I i trb H i I i m 1 m H U I N O N U U N O N O O N 1 O W N 1 * r G r U o U U H * O H H I U O I 10 O m 0 0 l0 l0 O O #* w3 1 CL1 I O 1 H H H I H I H ff H HH H 1Wm Oof mOMOOMOMOOml OOrl m NONQ H* * t W I I m G m e G m m e 0 m 1 c e r t c c # * m a 1 H I I I o* HH I H H I o H # # A -ti# ••.0* A I U I pOOpp0 900 I OGU I # NUNm N O a I # w# l O O U U HH O O I O N I U P I I I �• � O* C* C I C N I H H H H H I H G I c* H H # N# U C 1 1 b H I I I * # -ti1 y I I 1 1". 1 oom moom 1 OCNLHQ*# * \T>* ul I O H I HG NHH OHH I 1G 1mlv 1 m CG in mr.N1O HUI or maOi O H HH a N< + H ro N# ro l I W o f I I OH W* W I m O I oCH�+*# t« H we 1 1 l OHcU mm UOHU OH m 1991 OOmI 1iI OH0UO �1 III o OtOH T Q oN# N*** -ti o « H# .✓>— ro U N W Nt Cm* NN* AC a1Ii ON iI1 Om•HI NO� mat 0HU mQG O * * *s< WpN * O—U0 1 a< O i . Nb mEIHoO rorUoUororoor GmI mNu*O* I U i *iv W I O H 1 H H H H H I HO 1 O H H H H O* 5 N# ro 7 1 I W G I 1 1 0 HOOO N # 11* O m I I mOOOOm at C� I OOrn i Hk �O * N* m W# m* � W a 1 H I 1 I #� H O o* * m 1 I H H H H H I H H I o f H H O m* .AG* a+ -.C.I I c I rc r ccr crop r l c rH I <' Hoo H m c+ C* T* c* N ro a l o f 0 0 0 0 o I O m I O # N* D 3* \* * C I C N I H H H ,yH I Ho I ••o H HH # W Np* W* # O GGO# 7 1 I U'TJ G I I I W a # mO I -M C I I •• I H * N* * H m I N HU-• I M m 90m Om OOm I N O Pm 1 7<• H U H mHU H mO* .ti* O £* C* E I U H I O o o I H O I b o# o O # I CLC I 1 7 H IC * o p O p# 'O* x** W I O H I H H H H H I b H U I H H H N I I L O I I O I S O# *�* O* O I N o I c G v G G m O c O c l H N* z I 1 1 £G Nm I -•�iG ~G Hm O* OI N* � U •• I I •• H H H H H i 0 •-1 0 I TO � H H W* .N N* — * # * C * .. vl H * .. i { .. .. .. 1 * # O* -- �' U* N 1 .. 17 •• N •• •• H N i .. .. I pp .. .. N H .. N .. * N# * -ti * U T* E 1 C I 'O - N H a I C W 1 4 h •. •• A D v •• H LL d* 7# *w*NNU*ro••••1 N 10.•9 mN •'.. O> IOC W1 N,C 'nN O❑•nNCL C*N * U* ro * 2 A r I .. N I£ H Q > .. •• H 1 -ti N ro i l •• > N TJ >£ .0 b q Q >* p# * N* -.i H* U C i H •• N I O bn H b -n'n O 1 w E m 1 L * N* N r4* N O D I N W N I E 1!•i Q> U U QQH I N N N•-1 I U VI TTNA O Tr.�A IC# * N* H N.i * N N N I a.l .0 N I N W N 7 C N I C 7 N ro i ro\ w ro b q N b N 3* N N # N G x S N N U W O N* O+ * * U a C* m Q£ i U a£ a I> m [� H w W w a a N W I m Q a W I U> U g q Q a Q q Q a 9# z# 6 Appendix Collision History Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah w -trans June 2009 4 for Location: State Street - Norton Street to Gobbi Street ADT: 13100 Number of Collisions: 109 Start Date: January 1, 2003 End Date: December 31, 2007 Number of Years: 5.00 Highway Type: UNDIVIDED 4 LANES Area: Urban Design Speed: <=45 Segment Length: 0.8 miles Direction: NORTH/SOUTH NUMBER OF COLLISIONS x 1 MILLION ADT x 365 DAYS PER YEAR x SEGMENT LENGTH x NUMBER OF YEARS 109 x 1,000,000 13,100 x 365 x 1 x 5 calculated collision rate = 6.08 c/mvm statewide average collision rate* = 4.95 c/mvm ADT = average daily total vehicles entering intersection (adjusted for seasonal & weekday c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles * 2002 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans Location: Main Street - Norton Street to Gobbi Street ADT: 6600 Number of Collisions: 23 Start Date: January 1, 2003 End Date: December 31, 2007 Number of Years: 5 Highway Type: CONVENTIONAL 2 LANES OR LESS Area: Urban Design Speed: <=45 Segment Length: 0.8 miles Direction: NORTH/SOUTH NUMBER OF COLLISIONS x 1 MILLION ADT x 365 DAYS PER YEAR x SEGMENT LENGTH x NUMBER OF YEARS 23 x 1,000,000 6,600 x 365 x 1 x 5 calculated collision rate = 2.55 c/mvm statewide average collision rate* = 105 c/mvm ADT = average daily total vehicles entering intersection (adjusted for seasonal & weekday c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles *. 2002 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans 3/17/2009 Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Appendix C Future Base Conditions Level of Service Calculations Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah N June 2009 w -trans N F C d of o E 3 FM Q CC ccaa 40�O.S mm Oipa0OpO�.�n 5E) OGMQ ti NhtC4�4i¢N�k d pp Cp �y v r O r i-MO N G N9 Ott G r ij O Y wrc-: FF G• 4I J CO Cdi c ' Q � F •U �.O eCC?...Y MGYM CO P9. ��C4 CnOOmI M '"GmOW^r ca C to C Q O ,,.// �O ppr O` S mD.S ei S m 01 P N Oa..�n G 459.0Oy Ca IQ N N '3 OMf U mO- U ete++0�� U ONYX N rs ca ILd =ZS>=��u�.'����a¢���a o cB rL ca y Y �s tv o C Q m ��.. CyfG t!.'C1 NM f.J FSO �.. t[f N OOOO NO OGSTN nQ1+¢ 44NO Uca d o W © Y Y Y Y C�� 44pp 'OeY U �N @S OGihNA 4t®{)GN O O'�Q® OO 4,Q6Nn¢Y¢ � N ca FM9"- 5_ IM 1.1 � 5� p. EtC1 � `� z - N C U EY IN d �® `SS "'@COro���Cm O"•� O :NNC@NQS O..N�ONUMU �� O m •/ w d �i- 0 '�' `� � o c .= eNn •= rNi o g � ^ ' ro r o � � � o..@.� G `e' �° rc oay �000. fr e- N O Mn _ T � � C C C yJ��.'K �OSe Sm.Sm Sm TOmM N @.00NON CC.^a@Ya U. Nf�t'OA:uf C� M C OO N COs M's op pp U SE���OOPQ. OPfW4mf Ofm O@tn OPMONr $OO @ �CrGtn C :m mTp@ em�f¢ OC..N GON N I'd L v �: '!EWpQ3. p5� d�ai.CD O1 " c W w U U StCi Elm -9Eca g �v4�via¢z�aF5�¢g.�aa>o����c¢ a Si N C N_ W m t: d m �f" C �2 Q O�e O 0 TM m N q O0511 = I cs v O v.„. � w U)T44 m � olr3i e o o a oig� " om q p "i ''iU -q ivr' mno �. CL CR OI P tS �:S�O�: CPiOn OPi,r �^O f:vf @ OON BOO. igi0C @�Sme�eppU�U Ck wJ �@ r.O o� O .PPG M Y O�N.r Ofii N o N b x _Ss. vio Z. -Bill� 2fV �u I!' $ ��g ''aI- J! 2,'=.'�i �via¢��'a C gOt[IM1 m YfMm M.O N O P,mO @M N �1 O �tOp pp�� No .s tS lCO.0 {'7CM CN M. mrOO@ M1C,S ON_NN N �� J p J C �2 Q gze m m mov `- Mn � CL VCP C c V) v y _ = S �a _ 2L go 3 p SSC v w Eto o.•, N� v rn�'`g Sci 3>�e-•9LL.t�fnma¢.'3af-a.¢wa7�'"a>�a��ca�s¢�d`s,'°` w w lu ce U _ a � a M O ua ouff �HM1 �� O m OO@ O N iV �N �RAOC t�pp �.M1 tC p ; N 0 Q 4• (gyp... %Z @ ONi �..0 ® Oi w..0 C NNG m4 pN0 N N Y Oi C Stil• ,,,^r 99�� ppff m S T �'pM1p qg O Of CM1I. C�1f N C0 A N ��M.yy �[i m 0 0 �- O �.^ ^ O tfi pMp U pp U Y 47lL 66.g O M C N M.. tom. G Vt �p O N C.R N til M 0 Mill .14 0. G Q t0 � Sci >_�-�u +n v�c4¢ ,rs-S aw 5S,>y n u�LZ # # * # ai O O OO N � * � i*t 7 ' � O i MM •r •• ^ O M � tD 6N O � k iXYC. k R: iYY.S 0 * a unfit _W'00 f-0 N.O.- momoo M0u0 u'10 N�m� k X* aN•�u)Wu1W N* 4M •-� .-� O O O •-� O C O X k H N a » w» mH o�.. mai O 7ikC5 ixYC� a~OM M # x Wit 3 cn i od't0 i �o�0oeroc u�u� Mm oo.. oomm.-i k• kx # u# a o nm a # L# x xx tl 100u0OOi00N i m OMM2i nMM k• k U L# C V7 M H 00 W# C 0 W 3 OQ+*r m -• NO NOONo ti NO # 144 a*t 0+ W N* .� m O m OOm m NCO W V7 EOo�pclwv: m w o 0 x s# « a D o .., •,..• o ie . M 3 yra �# # o v,: W i M -. O.•+00.-�0 10 u1 CNO 0 0o mu1�o yi*i m o: a o nM ,Yk,* 01# •kms# m O LY G.W w tro. i*t Ta N 0 NONOONON � % XT k ky F * 4* O i a+wO 0vx 3* 7 •Op .r i ; � 3* O TO %# Lro. O i U * v0 a 0 0 "u0 00000000 a5 * S N •u 0tCi �.-ice.-�ti� � � w `» ' V ..T lul .� i .y X X i C IOU L * * 0 C C OsPOOd'O�-+ Xxat O 0 C ~ d O T# # N* m N " M O a O .-�0-+00^+ 1010 u�0 C' N n N t0 0 0] .F.1 X a C1 O U d i VJ M x # y .r .- .+ 0 6* 7 3 ww ro# ro* 3 W w mocaoolpoto -i6� ro w m: cu* + in -a w o 1no�ooln 1n * 0<p 09 0cD09 09 0m 00m k % • F • I,- R'a y» N ° .4 i*t i*t vwIr m° 0,0 momoomom 000000 V U�o 0 cao w°. H UO k m x* ro* ui wF i .y CC* a+# U# u tCi L i U ~ W 0 4 fn# 0# a* * v# 0 C Z O u001pO0u00 u0 OWN OCD uOM ice.-iNQ NONOON N T ••d'nn0 : 0 .-tNQ Lat m O mOOmOm i 7 •+N NNn )NtOQ NOQ # L# 4 OCN 0nmm 000 a Om 4# nonoon n T ••wmmo v oaN m<rooa uaw a coo _44 * v# s T o, v 'oo i o4••4�cn v> O.00o=v v. #A#m•••• ioow •• ew 3�� H� >v-•p� ^Q •• O> 4 � Y U H w : W* cAorovAOAa#v# ,'g.C# 7# 7' 0# 0# 01 * U C •-' •• 0 0> O 9 ••�-� 0 ro N 7 ro\ i O 'a 3 i •� U U O i L ro Q T O >. � y C O' O U U# O'# ui O T O T 'OUT ro O# it 0 7 w # L* ro# O 10 0*L# O O fi L u N El L 0 a+ 0 1 ..U� .U. •� Q> U O U •� p g - 0 3 ++ L n ro u u -• ro .-� 0 0 7 O m L L B 0 0 0 0 0 L Q90++>, .Ur ..Ur3 utUOi Q> U O U C fi -� 0# L4> ,C C: c: 00 OW WTC�•+.� i4w > i>ro T+ O L T L L L# 0# CN>ro NLro44# 7m�++++ rJ yN��mT++ m O 0Cy G*J. T C ••� •-� -• 4w > > LCNS 0 LLO'CCo00�03 >* 40 0 N 0 lu L C NT. .'r'. 0 L L O ttl C 0 0 0 03 C0�A44CGw UUW UU4=> aNc_1a.'^c 00 O.0 Ln V) N(nQQ# Z# H U momaamcm7 mm7 N N O## +F N# 00 ' 0 1 m a0 N* 0.l rn .-•- nonoon0n i0O omm, 0 00 01000 x Xit woo nm W M Wi*t w Hey a » w» mH o�.. mai O 7ikC5 ixYC� a~OM M # x Wit 3 cn i od't0 i �o�0oeroc u�u� Mm oo.. oomm.-i k• kx # o cpm � x xx U'tla tOM � Nnn p: k a0+ i*t w O a Q i i tl6 O W 3 OQ+*r m -• 000 W 00000 W u00 u)..O m # 4'.-�u)O W O W k N a*t 0+ W N* H' Ute+ m O m OOm m NCO W V7 W o 0 x s# « a 0 ry roh o W i V1 00000000000 t -v1 00�'J�O [.. x k* +*r 0❑* M i vA �* a O ..n �.a nM m03 ,Yk,* m O LY G.W w tro. i*t Ta N 0 O i a+wO 0vx 3* 7 •Op .r i .-i .+.-i % X X# # : %# Lro. T- o o* v.C# # m L.. H u O0000000 % x �5 m00000m m a5 * S N •u 0tCi �.-ice.-�ti� � � w `» ' V ..T 0i*t • i .y X X i C i roU i>. # # 0 ' C N O NOONoN ' -N i NNNO OtCQ c!c Q L# �* V]M..] ' O 0 i O 00 sNN X000 OW Om 0# [n* .F-1 3 W w O r* 0<p 09 0cD09 09 0m 00m k % • F • to v�o X X 'o 1.4 0 : N » c V � C: #* * 0* 0# cao w°. H UO k NONOON N til 9 Xk a •.�� Y X ro CC* a+# U# u tCi L i U ~ .-i ti .r u0 O % i*t T 0# W 0 (n# 0# O C m O mOOmOm i 7 •+N NNn )NtOQ NOQ # L# 4 0* * v# 00* Z 0 a o nonoon n T ••wmmo v oaN m<rooa uaw a coo _44 * �°a» .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 L i v# it a A* U# zt .T •. o •• i ro v e.vv 04••a�rn••w> ••'OCC •• fi o C H > ro ro i Q •• C>•-' 4 w a�ov)wOi*t v O'A o •• ro OAO 0# ID �+*t U C S •• T U 4U O 'O 0� ro rom � a+a+ m\ a U 7 _5 G d o U U# dx 7 N+06#t+ro0 L# ro# 0 001•• 0>A 0 0 L 0 s tp Q90++>, .Ur ..Ur3 utUOi Q> U O U C fi -� u)OTOTTUTroro# m L A 8 0 0 0 0 0 W� v*L#oLW 0* L aW3++L 4> q 00 C 0 ro�OO 7m�++++ rJ yN��mT++ m O 0Cy G*J. T C ••� •-� -• 4w > > LCNS 0 LLO'CCo00�03 vLLT LLL*vi O C > ro ro 'aro 4 4# u# FC#>*++40 V16m �c1aa>WU�-+O44 M'W -UUW iUU4 A> �aNc_1a�cn o, OO O.CLLt 44#0# rn rn tndd# Z* H U S N O O O ® G 'W O• O GO, e- M C M O' r O` O O C �{e N N Y 0 a D A� �„'�T..O �m S.S �CC6 QlM1@m. tffN N •G tD R:c� Nn O�Q'<��m ES �." T O r •- M O TN OO O �i O r r 5� 4'fC000 .�. •�: o •g y -4 ^` §yO Q OeNM O�N @ am +8 O m[C Qgap0 µ, r Q2.1' N c r own Q � r U a 'Q�0000e�o oaf ;on ��ee �opi mora y c �£ SIX as v d •n r m v�•ri o o. o E �• �, I NN � LL Q 9 '-pCCC om _ ,i ¢�° �� !` U Oi ti J [YJ m. CJ l0 V t0 A t0 W Q I g � O Siri W:r Mwa_c�a doM ami M e o o Q. Q c� ocli a g M o JR C � 0 �� � O �j O � R. � N p � O � r � O tD •y o Qi +� O Q3 C. O O .:" 4�! r r r tpi r r r r S kk w (n A. En g r Q BOO f F�:� Q S O O� O R: O ui � t®ei.0 •tf W �� Q�� Q O� O O C) s[ ^ Q a Q �r00rOa+•. C sm+.�Cp'.S OG�Cr� O �`� O n k r 4a cnEn o Si � � �•Yf C��fL� g �� mA SJ �C U xiii J.>''��`3 u:mv10ia¢�maS S.''w v a> Hit 0 °J'�•-.� u. d �Si gtp 0 0 d + o C C G r l y r M C O C O N S N M W �` r`�iq$Sm �°N'•n w000.'r co,q .m.`8 omongcm W Al 3 j O ONO p , C O U C m o m 10 p m pm to M Mva m p o n o �.r p m m W M 0 0 {. �Im+....O�O�:CnO•n O.m Om �M CW O•'q'r0 ON�N4r'AW ` OOTii b cdi � ,e.` p e1n0 pp G e�Vt 4F� `b td 11 m O VCL M 4 p p p p p T rc C�^: ap•. O flf.0 m0 O tmD O N im�f'.0 N m 26 5 e) t� �'a.Sg.o ri N c _FF,L% LL^c ^ § w cT a w� a, U3J Q•v V S` U J �. I— '+ m •,O w �a C3 tQ TO =H, L) Uic Jo, vE5Q oc¢� CL p tonO : 00f MOO l tn d E+r, QP•OIA m W rt13 t0 Q O.OrO v A fr G Nm(,)e`U r � —► +�-�''v :3i a'mo o....Sm`u•M oP'i .-� .m-•..m-•osi R^+r� c°r Co.. "i� � ey � N Ili s 5Xi 3'�+ 67- M T`- el— a�'f.�gm�'.g eq-'�a•.m-amen �.: In m pgrO mi- ¢mg�v.mm U'qU SA 2 O r to M r m O C N q O f 0 N O N t4IN ? r•„� ����... F�gS .00f•P 00ir a�OP COOq rrp MmNg'-d Q p w en.: Qt a UN'f 0 0. # Lq cpR yq p c :O p p m.0 m p a�vy m tO u'9 N 0 0 0 0 G^ OO to N € C 000 OOC�G 4NOMO F� _ ^ N N 67 T. T ^ its0 oil ��$''S m o '� 2tii Jam_ �W' 1r. 31) ':HI Ilioawac�a�3>a��� F F » 00000000 a v o U to� 01 L 00000 o o Co 000 00 i * _* * �" 7kJt` a CL * » 3 c ..o••�oo.-�o--� -�N WO M- O'< opQ i*t * * U* V) a } 010 NNO F ix( U* a+ U* M 7 C .0 * 01 * C* * M* 0 *.r ro i O w o w0 o w c m tOOtD00t0 0 OD c L * * w y* * o* z a v.. .n .-� k X * qqg 0 * L -'4 Q* .. >* G. F F C O O 0o X X O Ol a O* h 0 o Xx iC % '* WI c 00000000 ,,r5, §5 i X x G 3 06* 4J* OF L U O �Nr O.NrOO.N-�o.N+ a¢5 �¢5 x¢ 00000000 x x x** m cva ' o # c* i s 0* * a* 0 ... iF 3 iF ❑ 7 .-. •• •-� X Ch 0 U * 00'00 O o '* A N 0 0* Cq M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N, o w W* « ✓F Or�O k 0 ro v ♦ O O O o o 0 0 0 0 x O .'G � D.0 * * V * •0 it o o i a+u0..o 7 * OD VJ � X ' � I �* � u* 3 W C Oro* C1 i W W +O+* * G* Lit ro a O vovoo Op NM N.r ..pT C 00000000 x x ..ro. Z* 0 G �C* `I * wi*t v tT+ i aO,. 0* M* W* SF i M U.-. i 00000000 t00 NN l�0 00 * K. �•. h•p SpLO* •.%.rt i L * * o rn u .. VOp '0 0 O 0 .+� ~ aco-0 X 13S* W N ro* U* * �* 0* s+ O 0 M NONOONO N 7et't0 NOOM N k k* t x* L* a � o* v* z COOCO0000 S Tl�hf�M u O to i 0 00 op � kkk X a � d* R. N * � 4; _U _� — 7 O — > iikCC % X ii%CC i%%%C � L v� C * � .. .. .. 0'.9 .. % •. W i+* C]* tfiJ •• t O ••b0. •• 8 0 7 i o" �>A �• 0 Md 1 0 •• t00 Nq OG�* Nit Li 7 U* zSN v* GJ * •• .c^Q U C •• ••7> G.���W� O V 0 ro ro o i ro O V7CaSS*7* C d o U U* d* y IP. Nit W 0 9 a P N B> L N 6 6> U >. •.U. : 0 U- 0 U 8 .. OMl N A 9 W W U N O 0< .. W i 0* L* W t+ * 0* L P i �+ S O CL> t C b0 0) 3✓ 4 a 0 i u s+ i ro �+ . 0 7 O P O :: t Kc V> :> G 0: T+ v L LTJ L L L* 0 ro C M > 0 0 L td 0. 0. * 6L'.-ipu'f QtOQi*t ,�y,x�CC ttl O .c � V C a > ro L Vi S S U L L O i ro C 0 0 0 W V H O R. OL C W i U V W t u u a. � I 3 0 0 0 S S .0 S m 0.* 0 N U a c VJ VJ M V) Q Q* z* F F 00000000 00 i * _* H U O NONOON N k 7kJt` a CL * Q * N U U* a+ U* M 7 .-i0 00 0000 �%JC(C * > * N..>. �+ N * * U* M* O i N ONOONON^ X m Om OOm m' k* i 00 wL C* * 0 * * W * z TJa i N .-� .-� .r X K x S yi4XCC* iG I * * O * N i .� 'O - X i X x G 3 06* 4J* OF L U O �Nr O.NrOO.N-�o.N+ a¢5 �¢5 x¢ �P W J H �kk( M t S 3 i � i s 0* * a* 0 fsd C O O Oo 000000 X X k k �C x* E k �xC jjjkkX�tt��� * �* Ch 0 w 0* N* a' o � � O � 00000000 ' k ♦ O i � 4 .'G � D.0 * * V * •0 O O O o i a+u0..o i ov* it 3n 7 i OCD'GO � X ' � I �* � u* � U O* * u C1 i 0 ..0 0 t O S* * * V) .a. F U O i 00000000 x x 0 x� Y� �C* `I * wi*t tT+ ryk'y x X X* o* u mU i L * * o rn 00000000 xx`x ti U6 1 V3 N* N* Xx '0 aa+ u i w M* C* 3 W w m � w ro*10 c* L* m a� o� N O N O O N O N M Copp s o K -+ •-� o o� mm to F Z "* i bC0 7 O i C .-� .r .-i O X it 7 c o- i r -U7 C* Wu 0 0 i i 0* M* i M OoO0000 O u00 min mo co 6L'.-ipu'f QtOQi*t ,�y,x�CC •.0.* P x C�.1* Cs \** S D'� i 9 ' O XXX* X X .H -i ooi Om m iGC kkk"' * •0* k rd S* ro* U* L t i +.+ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 p u'1 m m 00 Om00 y* 0* 07> x* X X * IOw* .-7 ... O) * q * t0 • • O • • 'p m • • fi o a ;UVF > r-.. : R M CJ' 0 , N U O * N L� U* *ztF+i.. i Q ••�>,�i O.iT U6V iWS qGl L1 • • .E V70a0a**a* �d a ✓ v* v* N* 00* N u c - .. ro 01 O P •• W>S i o v o m ma N ro� o �Q9 0 ++� S U t+U v m O T N TJbG9 110 ro* d* 7 W L* u* 0* 0 0 fi L P li N a+ S 0 .a. 0. > C 00 C NEl 0 3 ++ 4 Q> 7 ro ++ ++ ' o 0 .a+ i 0 P O P W W TJ G i ..+ ...... 0.4. u> > T ++ p U L v 9 4 w ro C Lo > ro ro L 0 m OL 0.* *i* 40 0 M M4< U0.'a >COU ra LC V, A= LLO�roC000�U300 i -+P P. W a W UU W t U V CL s> aNU O SSSS O. a cVJ VJ VJ VJQQ* d*0* Z* F F F _# a O ADM Vo'tN0 tMD� (... 2$x 7Zx C * t0* »�# 7 bGObO 00 m R O o x ' o ❑ 00000000 ' t0O ' mmmoato No Oa* kkkk �mm o • 0 C' Nt0m �t k Jt0O0 O 0R. O 00 V C,mO O M M k toR O X * U+*t V] R O x k k* X* O X .Ni ti * n M N w t0 • rii —o—oo�o.. m w*« M* Mia o nM oommo a R ># ># ��tt kXkkk jkkj * # o— i*r W# i Y*# * c, M o I' m �0 "' ^ O * ' W CC Y 0H Vl tnO .-'00 C' N x # 3 x ooq R# # V]# G a O NONOONONT NM ' MOMOOM M mN m W MOOO k * kk kk kk * ..� M F X X # w y * O• N 7OGD 0 O 3 fA ' M.. 00000000 ' 'nO ' 0000 ' # �j " aC'NO)Ci 0)fA# N OR, Q* * R* F ' U •+ O 00 ma tOm NO toMMo amoo o » oo : w YC , z e* » a: m °gip •• •-'•, NONO0N0 N ' mornoorn m x kkk j4? * 00 u Y# AH M tDOtD0000Otl0 .-i LL) i NC MN X ••�� X �( k # * too tocp 0Ot0 .-'N n.•*.-iO X* OfOQ ' x�(OtOQ %X * Lit town0 ' k' r,* a I X X* k ' G v� .,N.* .R.* N# [n i —_ — .r .-�.r •�yti� � — — — iiiCCCCC * Et*t 7 ..U, * # 'N * 0 N 0 * — — — — — X # # W 1 � R# * y» a � v o 00000000 k # Ol ' G 4 .� t 40.1 # # L # 9 ' ' C G O >* X z* * d* % N iYwW iCOJ 'O# *'• 0'070 s�}f k u X #y# W' 0 Rue * * qF L U� momoo m om x¢ # X x# # u* x¢ k N o >> V U R# * * 1 D o H N .ti N .- .- N N' X X' v iXi M# *# 0 ' C 00000 000 ' X ' 'N ; 4QU ; VRLI -% R 6'GOU 4oa••d'tn••R> �a�.. a>�' a• >R R. 0o i w i o 7' #YRR'Oy••�R>yMQ'p L#R#RO6'L W'6 OY>�U�3' �Yu a) Q>aRi�Y.O.'u G 6'O)LA6 to 0>>R•R 9U'O R R# RR ROO#••* 3 w wm * * * M of *,ca — o momoomottnO— x xg—' *G*m atu C M> 0 tL0 6 d# u o 3 O i # # Q# MQm ' cuaa '>W U' -'O d O.4W ' UUW ' VUW�> '.oN O O A .0 .0 A d 0.# 0# =M M M fnQQ+ Z# s* M*- y# C] i L tOOtOO ONOO i x x' .s: U. C * \ # u i O '� M M .-i M M XX iXC ikC ikG iXC iiikiii iXC Pxi ' N z* 2* N* O C o Y 0 Y W N* >if*F — —R — r d% O ••W ••••RiRd6'O .. .. .. R ..R R.. .. ••tA a*t R* R Ri*FB q* R••.• '00 ' n N R .'E ••b0a •• 607' F' 0 d.• d ' to >R' R .. R > d 7 Rtn R0# 7# dqO RRgO q3** R# L ' U* Z R# R# A Y 1 .. �.+Q u G -0o .. 7> •-� ' 0.' N •-v o u U- U dU w R1 o A A YU R C3 A A* y# G a0 u u# o'* y W# m# * L# R# m row R>A o b L m e mavo >' u�i'•-'u Y Q> u•� cru c gg ..m �n o>,mvvc�vRR. LA 6 R R Roo# W' * R# # R#Ld>'CmG' 0.0 A R'.8 0 3 Y L 7 R' Y Y •-O ' R W0 RWWb C'••+.� '0.w -+ -. > i>RGM>RRLRdd# w : �* ¢* tn¢ ° coxa >°cic5 5wwaw c�ciw° cRic�a°.°>° aNu.4 z* V))Ln0Lci¢a» 0* F # N O N O O N O N N M w wo10 * O W W6 C 00 m R O xxxx X* X ' o0000000 NO ux�t X# a nN00 C1NP7* ' MH O C -� * * �mm o • 0 C' Nt0m �t k Jt0O0 O 0R. fA* o iikCCC X ' * U+*t V] OOOOOo OO -'N Nptp to M OMOOM M O)t0 MO x k k* X* W # a O n M N w t0 • a iX4 iXC ' .. * G NM mn�o ` G R* M* a O * R C w '+OO~ -'0 tD M t7) 0 ��tt kXkkk jkkj * # ' i*r W# i Y*# * c, M o I' m �0 "' ^ O k x iC iitt ' W CC Y 0H Vl tnO .-'00 C' N k# ENNu'1 W tO to f*t 3 x ooq OQ* +*t R+*F u.+ my >* Ocm NONON 9 9 ma Normo x at000 o o a Rs* » m ..� M aA+ 03 M q - i NOON ' W R ' Y W# *cg c 00000000 0 ' Y w ' o * 3 # 7 ' TIO N i y% # i C ••W+ 0 i R.9 NO t0. .-a. * coo NONO0N0 N ' mornoorn m x kkk H x * U* 00 u Y# AH O ' C too tocp 0Ot0 .-'N n.•*.-iO X* OfOQ ' x�(OtOQ %X * Lit V'N � O n .F.1 XOn * ' G v� .,N.* .R.* N# [n i —_ — .r .-�.r •�yti� � — — — iiiCCCCC * Et*t 7 ..U, O •.. # v * ..G. C# # R# NONOONO.Ni O•rOO^' C * # 21i R W**# m i L H N W # N .. i*F 7 'RO ' O t** Io u.'- ' C G O >* N OtpOOtD iD ' �$g AH UH s�}f k u wRo O o c 0000o0000 � * * W O O O O to O **, v N* G# ro# .. v -% R 6'GOU 4oa••d'tn••R> �a�.. a>�' a• >R R. a7 RnRo# R# o•ao••RRgo 9yd R# m ma Y YU m� o N c�ao"'� u u* 7' #YRR'Oy••�R>yMQ'p L#R#RO6'L W'6 OY>�U�3' �Yu a) Q>aRi�Y.O.'u G 6'O)LA6 to 0>>R•R 9U'O R R# RR ROO#••* R' A R' G C R 3 Y L a W W> i> N LR R# L 0.> ' m G ' M# ># Y 0. 0 ' O R' O W 0 R W b C' •.. •...•. .C. R L C Vi N R ' L L o i R C 0 0 0' R C M> 0 tL0 6 d# u o 3 O i # # Q# MQm ' cuaa '>W U' -'O d O.4W ' UUW ' VUW�> '.oN O O A .0 .0 A d 0.# 0# =M M M fnQQ+ Z# F -00.=-.0000.u-O-OOIt'i oM l� COCV lam* oo^ oM� � .o O C V* C CNO N- N x m * + O N of M U 00 19,990OtO000 N NOr Ca 4Oa NC1 tiµ x P. * N 0 rC Rn M .-� M .-. ti M M .-i .ti M ..r .ti to N O itJ u•1 o t['1 N O N .-i N N •-� N ++3 fn a- COCOOCOaooC ON au11 * V) tD O tD O O tD <D O O <D O iO N M t� * O N ✓� x x N a 0 .-I O O* N- N* x ltl •• A * .L' ; a O O NONOONONOON c2P w C OCU 00* �* * vbMOM OOM MOOM O [O C O G L* U 7 Cfi'0 ^ O O C 11 LN N N* Cq V) O NO NO O N ONO O N c w N N I� O I� U tD O w U W* W 3 o-* x U U* H u O NO NOON oo t• � Ol�l` � C •O •O 0.0 M M M M M t` .ni O* W i W C i 94). 5 .. tC t>. IOC i i 0 ^ .-� ..n .-� .-� O - - a x M aA+ 0 C 0* ✓*� CIN * W M O N O N 0 0 t0 O V) cc tO O t• rn* rn O rn U CO * N A 0 0+*t Q Wx a O •-�O•-+00.+ •-X00•-� OOM sM* •O C* a N Z>* m No* — — — .C. A A 0 * ..U. N ++N* ro * OMOMOOMOMO• 9ON 000 W -- N* 0* O � NONOON NOO9N � O••+C � IO 0.* p ..0. w 7 0 x + U 6 aO» C C 'CIO .-i .r r' .-i .r '-i O O N .-� N +*r t9 N a+ W l V * * * O •7 L vO 0 t 9* * * LD I M O- 00000 OO ON 000 am 00* l�•Ol�UhO LUN* U* N D* * * F U •-� o..00•-� o -T I u�* •o •o W C ul >1 : U A * * U * .0 D. .. - - * w � N 0 >>� N t+ 0 ^ ^^ ••+•-� ^O O* N^N N^N O* U t>. .-� .r ... .-� ..r .r C I N U I �# * o I w O C O C O O C O C O O C O C O I W t� O h U N* `Q o �* m o a 000000 0000 ocm I In •o •* 0* 17 O* O µ C o •-� •-+ .+ ^ .-� .-i O O N- N * A� m Www �or�* a a — o o4'o^o^oo^ corn o momU » u ax .. aoCoocr •coov� Doti v1 o N* •• ' 4 > C .. N^N^^ N N^ ^ N ' ^^C O •tD O* A* at 0 * V]* ^ m V) •- O W o 0000000[00000 NO W IO ^rn* COC V NONUM* T* U O I NONoON NOON 919 00 t 'O UC* •O •O A OG FC N N N N N 7 M 0 •-� ^ n -rn * 9* W I N Ox ,c* 0 I' h O^ OOO c 0000000 ::, ON^ I N iPL 0*rn* •• zap O� MOMOOM MOOM�30^N �•N urnY �O,V Mx �* n µ ^s N* 9k ** U ..* .. ... ^.-� .r .w I O.rO i ..TO N.-�N ^* I" w0 * .0. U x N — N .. .... .. .. W .. .. ro .. .... .. **. N W N V ** N•• •• d ' O .. b Oq •• 8 0> 7� 0 'C ++ '� W A N O A u 4dto. N x L UxvB ZAs+ .. 0 �� Q ..» .... 0 0 �..>NL>.EA'ODQ>* y* 7 NO* * U C •• L O b 'O 0 6 M i V O>6\ UQ Q* d* U u- ¢c tro. O ul uv) T>,uL o >>¢.0 Nx W I N* N * W L N *+ A N N 3 4I L y y g Y y N IC : ro\ N ro ti A 4 ro L 3* N C M C C I O o N w W 9 'C lull W C C G 0.^ •� VI o. •-� >>0o.*Vac 0 roION COxxNNa ro9 ro� NOLCI N9O 0.N vol *o* a o* V) Q c Qo 1" Cc a I> x c7 7 P. 0. C w w w w v) <o U> U L0 C1 <.4 Q O <.4 C* Z* * OO CSCc cCcvocv' a I m N Nam= 00* I l��00� L g9oNtO N O 190.a i*t C C N * * W . 00'0 -� ^ ^ .-. .-- .-�O * _ 0 xF I N ^O MOMOOM O MOO M OI�M I t` W Omx 01001 W 00* m CO M I o U 0 H o d'od'o OC CO o C I m o NM C o o 9 M.r M.-. M.r O O (n .rM .rM 3 I o^ tOOIOOONO 1000 tO O wD : M* Now= OOX00 O O.-. 01 x •• C — O ** C.-� -. — — — ** NC i 12 •-� >* ^+* * ••A * X O 00000000000 cmm C MOMM M* M 1 * N L 04 I I'd* O NONOON NOON 0•-.00 N O O O $ O* Q G L* v U * 4L 7 I 1 00'0 ..n FF4 M 3 ! y x *** U u* OD M^ O 0 cc -0-00- O L� C .+ 0 .- 0.1 •-� a'! V* 3 0 `-O' I O i NON OON NOON I 9 VM ' N 0* 0 O i W C 00.� PNS NU tE Ii,x fOCH O .-iO ^ .-�0.-� ^' 1 0 N* W I VI O 7* * > .-. 0= a 0;- C^ 0 0 .+ 000 u'1 I N* N O N LD M N x '0 I 0 M I C N V7 ** O x =0*a .-.O ^-�00^ ^00 ^ I OOC I N* •O O ***_ C* N O µ v u w* .. .-� .-� .... -C 0* - - .-. * C A OC a+ A t ro ^ No* N^* OO — 20000No 0 0^ w C OC W M* 0 a— u M. O Op 00 O -M N NON MO* O 0 0 1 M i C N 0 a* 1 m'o -0 O .-- o OVUO -O^ NOOO000000OOCNCOCDC0Ux 0 N C AN 75 0 D 00 D N NONNN QN0 Ow CO t F - -0 O O*CO 4 V O 1 0*a OM OO MO 0 0 00 97 *LN0•• i 1 VI i ux *C0 O - --.. .. •-SON-� O* .N -N -i A O* •O N 0 w W C* * — IOM* a * C — — — 0 1, 11 v O 0OOC OON Ca yCVI*ix*µ OpN MM aw\o oa O .. ... N x aahao I Ux 0•-. o O10rn0Om Om OOm W � COCP00OO W Ox C* AH 0. o -r x w 00 pN `. O --i - --. .- -^ N W N O x ro I a0+ VC O ^ N O 00 00 N O C C P1 * µ rn O* z a i 0 p i O 9g- -99-3 g w O Ng O* 1W N** — N.N.* —N ^ .-. .-. .. ... —O.rO.^'-r tN.# rn v'ra. c* •.. .. * •0+ * U gNg C .. .. .. '00 N N^ O .*µ n x N •'fix * N N U* ro •• N B C N O •• A > N••^ C, d y µ 0 •• 90.1 •• fi 0> O C N A N O N 0. b0* N L * Ux vfi 2F .. N t.'E Q ..7> .. .. •..N N ..>N9>;$�'0 >* O* w Ni xOlx FOa, 00 Wt OuIU ^t ••� O I u 8 Vl I +•t 0> 6\ U Q Q* d* o.. •• N>y�QbO WV9� ro4+•• row\ D� L*U)"6*NOfit L C00CGt O�fi 6>U UQQ L O O UVI >1NA0AQA b*••* o 3 ++ L y y ro i y y N u ro\ t+ N 0>, A L O L 3* N* L i UO++*L0.>t * N* >> 0 0.*0U OO- 0i '0WWC�N••�CC�0.^•+• ». bO , * Uao* aro A0 0L WN cIC>cL MN AN MroQ'aw <0.aN QO Q••^ * z0 AO P. 00411* F - * * *7 7 Momoom0.mi w i � O O 01 +*r 1 1 0090 YXYX•• m •+* W m m m. * * w rn•-� F uo moMooMOM u�o V' 00 0 00 nwo m 0 0 0 o M M D m � ac<c�r WNN 00000000 O0000000 X X r¢ x* X* a o ¢¢gg •-� Yro* m* N* OT NO NOON N 0 06 r C* * U NM O OO c0 W W % X* OD L W i U C C m .-� .n .-i C] M xX XX iF OQf*r f*t m* m DOQ)00000 NOr NOhN u00.m=: OM i WN YCC3 i Km. fim .- w 3 04* 0 OV W N NO %x Fa+M C; .6 00 C Ovoo V c, u'1 O SOON N r ON�.� XXX N � u 0 0 C m* � Oji a r O � MO MOOM M � tO l�tO f�M r DONN X k* a kYY XY kXXi(' � �* M i mi*r [M .. O O o .. o .v .y .y X * •ry* 3 m Y +*r U • — — — — — F r Y UO Y m N* u * u 04C root rn c Lx O am* L* Ovi*r a ay YX. xX' kk' YX. iXC C 0V m e m y0 ,00 f*t o 0 » * : = i 0 x �w 0 .a .... iG .H.1 A wo �°. — .y " o a o o l o r Xxu kXk kkk kkY, « u * a kkk N i w 0.u1i Mo MOOM M XX `Xk� r U ••+ r>* 7 U O X! •• i F 7 • � 0 C r roU ro r m c r L * r m'o* * 0 r G u7 r a vm C)o o 00 OM¢ eke x La*t kx .0 F � C C ~ � .fir O .nr O O � .n-� it iiCG iiG! w i N hmmo C'N � d'00 � F k X 000 iXC K z Y* 1�0I�OOl�OI`• a 0* o* m* � 7�N NN.-� i A o 0o r 0 •. memo a) x L* 3 W w O A a O r t CCN r 2-2 M i UO t` * �* ~ D * t0* •.1. O 070'000'00(0 O O O * T* * m a A* i N m 010* Uw w•Oa v2'moo i 0 * tC 2 m* m LF 4 r W« m* U C i .. 04 9 •-1�> O � ro roS i a>'+YV Id\ 0 �.- c,* *m*00*Ymm :Om••�m>A v) fi 000 W0000000 W� *m*L*mLm� Am�amaY4 O. > C 00 C ❑m�YY.+i m�mm.�r�m>>Y m4L'CLL *�* m 0 m W trJ. b C ^^ ••+ O. W Y> > m C m> m m L ro o. a* g w vw*** r o c O C. o* of*r v z0 momoowom ro�N ulwfn ., 0 0o r v ..Om�D mom¢ x x* ** L* a N o+r a* ;r a o .. .. ..... OV'N �f+l��O _uoco i2 K m': v 0.r N* —m .. .. —0 .. —> .. .. .. % .. .. L* i * O* m 7 i .. m .... m i m0.0.6 � 0 .. Cl UUF .. m m.� •.+M* m* m L. * u* 9>07 i�>m-•m�mdo cru UC.Uiw� 0 c waoOu. (D v>caAA* �» N� m* m* 0)*00* N uar .. mmrOm�m>t o v• o mm7� Y ro1�0 U Umi mQbO >_�..U. a d0 uu*d* LL00>1mb'CU9 ro m* a (L L* m* m*L* m o fi r LY N r a L m A m i ..U3� ¢> u 0 r u• q e m 3 Y 4 7 m Y Y •+ m •-� m m m LA e m m moo* >> Y m L L 'C L L 4* a: m* La >* Y _7 >: r 2: ao o m o Y mo mcucLvar-..� 0.w > >roCm>romLroaa* m q mxx m r L L o r m a o 0 0 m3 00 o.cAAA 0. 0« P. _c* * ¢* m¢= U04_j >mc��awo.aw r c�c7w r c7vo.r,> aNU7 4 cnV1v1M¢¢* a* F - * * *7 7 .-r0.-X00'+0.+ NM mm w i � O O 01 +*r 1 1 0090 YXYX•• m •+* W m M 0 MOOM OM NO 0110 M.•� a tip0* x kXk� xkx k%k u o 0 0 0 o M M D 00000000 m u* a o •-� Yro* m* N* OT NO NOON N 0 06 r C* * U 47� 7 tpM i N W W '•1+ u# �** O* 0 3 OQf*r f*t m* m DOQ)00000 NOr NOhN u00.m=: OM i WN YCC3 i Km. fim .- ro� c ; OO :.400 .-� 0 0*w * C •+* m* WJ C Ovoo V c, u'1 O SOON N r ON�.� XXX N rn w w .w am ,*r » : •0 x 0 0 [M .. O O o .. o N b l0 C U 0a r m c* F r Y UO C4 X* U 00000000 N i u * u '0"- u 0H % X X k X' X k* N.-� NN N ,Fd f*r w V r m* * YX. xX' kk' YX. iXC C 0V m e m r 4 * * r m '00 * M* m 0 C a 00000000 x x Xa x i 0 r * V1 * N* rn O r .a .... iG .H.1 A 0 7 u N i w i 1M*** d O ~ O~ 0 0 k X X* t m L F m U a*t .m.. >* 9 0 X! •• i F 7 • � 0 i .mi G +*t N*• f*t O* A* 0 i 0 7 0.'1 � L �-. i O0 NOOLL]O N � Cr " * •1n i*r 7 * .0 F � C C ~ � .fir O .nr O O � .n-� it iiCG iiG! w i N xa Na C 0 r r C iXC K z Y* 1�0I�OOl�OI`• a 0* o* m* z a 7�N NN.-� i A o 0o r 0 •. memo a) x L* O r t CCN r 2-2 M i UO t` * �* ~ D * - .. .. 7m.- 'OO .... C .. .. .. .... .... L * T* * m a A* 7 o .. m .... m i m O.8 0 m- ..-a)N* m* 0 8 7 UUF> mdA m * tC 2 .. : ••90.l •• 0 t9 N o •• N Npm0 W+ i � V O Ca.0 �* u � W« m* U C i .. 04 9 •-1�> O � ro roS i a>'+YV Id\ 0 �.- c,* *m*00*Ymm :Om••�m>A v) fi �0¢90Y>i..u. u3� �YUm� 100>>Ob9U9 tutl tu0 gid* Q> u -• ++ O u C fi 0 L A fi m m m 0 0* W� *m*L*mLm� Am�amaY4 O. > C 00 C ❑m�YY.+i m�mm.�r�m>>Y m4L'CLL *�* m 0 m W trJ. b C ^^ ••+ O. W Y> > m C m> m m L ro o. a* g C, 0 0 m O >C7U-+:, m L m 5 ... m L L O m C 0 0 0 m 3 O O O A .0 A A O. U.* 0 WCr AW �UVW �UUDw m> �aNUa�T fn h N co 4¢*.Z* F - U E * - - a o - - - 000"Coo0. * x. _: * c r :01 mvo R** r * M* 0 mvo X RS F uo 000 00000000 * x F0 ro. M P « w 001-0 R it ii it M. 0- 0 �** : v 0 3 N 00000000 O i —_ x ' ro + 0* •� u1 Ou0O0NO u) NM CNNm X* k k t0Of0OOc00 t0 NNNO 0 NM L i e c Gt F i X %* M +t 00 C W * at O x 0 00.0 0 ' 0, e a+ C a0+ L • * Ga ' N ^— 00000000 u'fO n.M NO* C h..M U M U* M o °a.Q* 0 00 �m o OOO OO.•.•O.••. o•,--'� aa i mo M' 3 + W M OMOOMO M Cul x k%kkx xsa m i +'C+q _7* O Ni*i .a O i OOtOOOCD 0 nr�O .F-1 k k* Nx 0 >o* NON00.0N i "* X XXX k O* > 7 �mmo 0. m» e aav10i» w: o momoomom x x x x* �oo�aoom m* E, a,* m Lx o 9a Oi MCR b o. * * o ! 0 m O m 0 0 m o m xXXk kky, kkk xkk kkk X%k kxy, C N i 0'0 0 p i 0 MO �kk( NONOON N i i a%* * U i i U O' YY... X X%%% X %* ' 0 W 0 C 00000000= k♦ * **. Lq,. ' O roC 01 ' * . * O o a O co 4 o ' o�** C roU vim* i O i C 0— 00000000 * ci lo 0.kxxx* O 00000000 x* » al F W ••N+ i N* N* x C%� IICC k k C 7 .0.1 0 — — — O N .T. Oi qi Ni OF a+ U.. M OMOOMO M X* x * kky, N ONOON N ! 00000000T \* u GH 9 fFd 0 X k X ! O * b* k M x i* U* L i U O C 7•.N OON N �NNQ e 7F a ci rn*** Oi***ti� 19�OOt, b .. N.-� ko M. > Li r* roi Ol .. .. .. .. % .. .. .. W. .. '00 .. .. .. .. ..i w� *U*Ga*ro.. .. �O••9N:• ' O a. •• d i N Ol > d 0 O N 807... F' >O'ro� dGa 0••ro01AOGa a) O* 41* ' 0* vi Z U C •• ' . 06 9 0> 0 ro ro� u U N\ O +�-' •-'� CUC7 Oa Ui O'* 2a i`~ ro* 00* L* ro* O) ro 0) O W •• O>.0 0 8' L N g NQ'o 0 > U u 3 M U N i N O Tv•O'OU'0 a+ •.. Q> U -� ••+ •� 0 U C 8'^ m L 8 O 0) 0 N ro* 0 0 . W' O i 0* L M* >* d> ' C _M CC d0 ' o N O .a ++ L 7 ro ++ ✓ .. y U 0' 0 >T +' 0 m 0 0 Oz.U. 9 G' .......o O. w > .. �> p C N> 0 N L 10 O L G h0:A 0 L O.D. * Q* NQ."c ' UGC rI '>P7U�-+5440.'iW O' C C 0 0 0 1 013 00 O.0 .0 .0 .0 UVW ' UU4c,> 1.4 N U.4= N N N N6 44* Oi Q* Z* U E » a0 00000000 * c r :01 mvo R** : * F uo 000 00000000 * x ro. M P « w 001-0 R it ii it a �** : v 0 3 N 00000000 O i 0 NM to O * N* OC O t0O fOOOta t0 NOOO* com -.mm F e tC.* * w* c e v .. .-� .-� o OOO OO.•.•O.••. o•,--'� aa i mo O o xsa o N3 0 NON00.0N O* > O0 �mmo 0. aa.noo �*« ' N N 'C Oi MCR b a , 0 o� o 0 0 p U m ?i W 0 F UO �o.O. U +**i u Wroi 4 o ' o�** C roU vim* i O i C 0— 00000000 * L0. i (% N 1 N .a o O O j$ �F-1 X %* Ait b u U W ••N+ i N* N* k ikkG' YYx.. C%� IICC k k � i 3 i W O ..i i C — — — w ' 0 ro* ... 00000000T * * ..# p o �o .. .... a * + e 7F a ci rn*** o wooM000.00�'o x* % ro Si "%i Ui �* L USO i .. .. i .0. X i k X % i y2 X »CCC W ' O O* 0 C 00000000 OtiN i m.-�.rM i COQ * L* 00*' -'i vi 2a i`~ COCOOC C'9 ••tONNOi0• � OCN 01 ^+�C U Ota «F -t * �� 5 9 — i U a 0— , , yam .. 1>1 • N* 01 0 * Q* '00 UU •• a> L i U* Z.0 i V i •• i �.-�¢W t d i T>U 4U wO, lz 0 •• N 019011-1* 4t C O* C 7 0* 0* U C -. •• O O) 0 N•• 01 O •O O i ro ro5 ++ u ro\ i 0 > Q 9 0 >' 3' N U 0 i -' CUd Oa N 0 T 0 T. b U 9 U u** O'* ro ro L* ro 0 6 L ♦+ m. 8 L v i N ..U. Q> U '. O U N 3 ti 4 7 ro N M .-. i ro ..U. C 6 0 C) ti a m L d 8 Ol 0 0 l ++ C) 4 L 'O 0 0 L 4* * W* v* L 0.> C b0 C' .'i 40 ' O ro Oro m O Ol W W-0 C' •-� ^- d L C 0150 0 L L 0 0 W V> > 0 0 0 0 03 ro C N> ro ro L ro 00 > m m.0 02 0 4NN d 4* N 4d* 0* Q* NQS Uaa ' > W U'•.=1 C4 UU V. � V U4�> � aN .0 NQQ* Z* U E � o 0000000000000000 oWo --� momw m» ,", Q ^ V a. O �O �00� X00 N O N� rn O •* � � M n A * 7 b00 •410 .r .-, .-, ..n .. .-� O O a ^ C � .� U N* * N W i VI ^ W WOwo u O rnOrn0p 'Coo i OCC * MOM W W O W W M m * * h . o H o 00W ooW onm* • Rro, m O.C., N^ M m m m • Co C 9v M• o m 10 + a * * * 3 , M 00 •+0 -X00- 0-00-, OON N -0-MLo �4 O* aro+ * ^000•-� ^00 ••+y. .- _ * * M *•• S * A O M O M O O M O m O O M_ O W 10 * [ O C U 40 00.i O O 00 00 p Va'i 3 0 oa' En MOMOOMOMOorn i Orn.. i W a000000U.» 3 u o nonoon noon orno •o •o •* 0 .C, N w N .-i .� • .ni a0i w ' M 00 ' OOO o000o000 : 00 w Wow= Ci*r Ni*t _ O O O M O O M O O n� N N O O* t0* 8 N* ro » o o WOWooWOWooW owls^ o 00000 0 c w.Y all •�. >* •mom �o,nooln �oovl orn.-, �,* ;•,� N N""w o * * U¢a* �9 * U ••O m O O* * L00 m .0. O M O M o O M O m O O M ONO , O 0 0 0 W V3 O h U C* U* N >1 lul H u o , 0 00 00 00-, , m �O� �o� o* C* m 'o ^0 0 U roU � �** *» m o m oo 00000000000 Oow * momu o* : D0 46 VI r-* m* O ma NONOON MOON..C. V ::1 0 * * C i*t VI — — _ _ .", .-� .-i II ^ — — 3 ..C. — O RS nOnOOn 0n00 n OMn nOnp7 N* C* A •OO COCOOC COOL 010N . ..a ON Nit n 00 ^`•� U* �* ^ SE i , 80^ ' NONOONONcc OON •N+ONO , V N* n0 :21 u i O sr .-� .-� .+ .-, .-1 7 i 0 w �Rvi , O* N* 0 ' 'M 00 ' 00000000000 l,E00 Mn m. -i nOnCO N* 4i*r Su O* * Z._7 p NONOON NOON ONO) .+N •O 0* C ti v , W N * Cir .. m O-.>' C, * y —� 4 * rn W i F 4 i * U N E U * z A " , .. i 0 .. •p R7 . • .. y > > .. .. ' O N ro ' Q S > N • • 6.d * 7 * 7 N* ** U C , .. 0 ' ^Q ^� N OA N C. m* N * ..X. fi* N 0 B i 0 mU N 8> L ro¢6> U UQ6 •>+ L m m UMC >> A N,O 0 >>6 A Ni*t * w W * N* u m N I+ N � NC, _7 N 3 a+ 0 7 0 ro 0 7 N ro, t0 \ a+ ro A u N U 3* u* a» U m * u C> C m C 0 m 0 N W W V 'O W W C •-� [ C, 0.^ •- W U.70*ro C m0C C4 N NU«-) N V ro ro O w N N'00 O.N 0.O * p* CorilQ� � Uce2a � >a7c�—aaaxccR.�w � M¢ai:. � U>UAAQaQA¢a¢* z* o mcmcomomaom7 cNm7 O 0O U N* ^ i*r N m U* F i C NN.-iN ...i Q Nit U 0 C i i*r " M ^O H NONOON O NOON 00000 * h OOOUMOMUN*to O 0. , n O O O nN i MOMOO M MOO M i • N.rO rn •rn •* N* fC m , O.Cy •r0 O O N ** * * w O mom OOm Om00 m 00 W 0 NON¢ moMoom m om oon o •o ••-i* C •* V') C v* 0 M �Oi*t •• * O �' 00 i 000000000000 OMO rn* W O W 07 rn* to v > * U V 00^ ^00 OON C* p z .r O m w O w w00000000w Oom O nM i rn W O W 0700000 U�UN* H U O rnornoorn rnoorn orno , C •O .O N N N .-� .y ' u m gC 7t > W � M 00 0000000000 woo � OOn i W OOOQ N* 'O +S+ 0 0 i*r NII i*r A * .a wowoow 099W OOW •o m � 0 0 eµ 0*** ro* h .Ci m N CoSaro + N* •U. 0 * OO nOnc 0 n 0 n 0 0 n CMN wawQ Ni*r 0* U G 04 wO W o Ow WOOw 00).-i , .ny r. 1430 rn *°» w v m o* E wo.0<000 NuN h * N U A FuO:O 00 00 C 9 O O •* m j N G 0 M O NONOONO NOON 000 , O* C0p7 N* i. it C "7 N 6 �% fL* m i*r O * N m J rn O rn 0 0 rn rn 0 0 rn 0 0 n , N* • O ... Q* C p * ^ 9* �OrT*o*** �+ c — o* A cc nonoononoon- ono- C .-�o-.m 0 o*** 00 00 omn 0 000 0* N* n ma aNe*v*OOC*moo ^ 70. �* C* �+ w M ^O- C 000000000 O coca 00 NON[ OC* .-�O.-, R9 .r 0.+070* .-i O 00 00 i rn Ot •m+i*r ' •� '�' SF O. t O ., 0O* 000 000 :,C .-� .r .. i * O* V f*r v i*r c i*r .r .w V-0 O ' ID 0. 0 , m 00 COCOOCOCOOC Ew O S i * O* N* Za O O 00 00 ONO) +-�O •O OHO O* C N.* qk* U _ O••.O TO amu* _ mn *it M* U V vt4 ** m • • S > N • • -N+ 0.R. dm ** lN ,i N * • • • • i"Wm 08 N Nop uN h O fi w a+ 0>Q\ UQ Q* d* w ir O B i 0 m U m, fi> 1- <> U.< .4 •0 NN A3* U m :+ N S > C m C N, N 3 ++ 4 7 7 0, V 7 N ro a+ t>'0 q R¢ C, v, 0 N W W V V W W C .+ ro ro U 8 C 8'O V 0.N Go•-�i*r Ni*r oi*t H * cUa0o* V)< c°c��a 0 C mmm N NU mb N N90 >wul4=0 aw OU5iw MQaw , U>UAAQaQAQa¢* z* Appendix D Downtown Road Diet Economic Success Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah June 2009 w trans Downtown Road Diet Economic Success Road diets in a downtown corridor often result in an environment that is safer and more friendly to drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians. The slowing of vehicular traffic generally results in a reduction of collisions and increase of comfort level for pedestrians and bicyclists. The installation of a two-way left turn lane and turn lanes at intersections provides refuge for turning vehicles without obstructing the flow of following vehicles which also increases the comfort to the driver and decreases collisions. Despite the decrease in travel lanes, road diets have been seen to increase the average daily traffic of a road way by making it operate more efficiently. At the same time, road diets may increase the availability of on -street parking, and make off- street parking easier to access. The combination of increased safety, efficiency and user comfort has been seen to have a positive impact on businesses located along road diet corridor. Case studies have shown that downtown corridors that undergo a road diet generally experience an increase in sales and property values while experiencing a decrease in vacancy. This is often attributed to the fact that after an implementation of a road diet, it is easier for drivers and bicyclists to access a business and since pedestrians feel more comfortable, they are more likely to visit multiple business during one trip. Case studies shown below give some of the details of the findings. Fourth Plain Boulevard, Vancouver, Washington' Businesses located along Fourth Plain Boulevard were surveyed before and after implementation of road diet. After the implementation of the road diet program, businesses reported an increase in gross receipts of 3.1 percent. This is especially significant considering that comparable commercial zones in the city experienced a decrease in gross receipts ranging from 9.8 percent to 25 percent for the same time period. Atlantic Boulevard, Del Ray Beach, Florida Merchants in this downtown requested the four -lane to two-lane conversion in an effort to revitalize a suffering downtown business district. The road diet program resulted in an increase in business and resulting in Atlantic Boulevard being considered to be one of the more successful downtowns in Florida. The same report notes other communities where road diets have been implemented and it resulted in an increase in average daily traffic as well as increases in pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Lake Avenue Lake Worth Florida After completion of a road diet project in downtown Lake Worth, Florida, the taxable property values increased by 6.5 percent while retail vacancies greatly decreased to "virtually zero." Clematis Street West Palm Beach Florida' After implementation of a road diet in a struggling commercial district, commercial rents have risen and vacancy rates have decreased from 80 percent to 20 percent. Also noted was an increase in pedestrian traffic and private redevelopment investment. Sources ' Road Diet Handbook — Overview, Jennifer A. Rosales, 2006 2 Road Diets — Fixing the Big Roads, Dan Burden and Peter Lanerwey, Walkable Communities, Inc., 1999 www.walkable.org 3 "Lake Worth: Reclaiming a Small Downtown," Cynthia Pollock Shea, Florida Sustainable Communities Network, 1998, compiled by Dom Nozzi, http://www.walkablestreets.com/diet.htm ' "Traffic Calming Reference Materials," Ian Lockwood and Timothy Stillings, City of West Palm Beach, 1998, compiled by Dom Nozzi, http://www.walkablestreets.com/diet.htm Appendix E Future Road Diet Level of Service Calculations Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah 14 w -trans June 2009 a �M u x W` m 0 o �< ua¢s*!¢ -{Br W Oi W ID RD W. h n O N 4 GtO l+l Q� Of SN y ID N Y�f m d N M m 4MY O HMl W O Cr ^ O M a y $_ _ R r p C i+' f� .. W 0i 9O•' O � s s ;mgr W.Kf N A m aQ'. c-:; (j rC.r rC®�rO O. O OOa�r N r rO� V d Y `a'c°go" gems °fNr M..n �porrrN ot2N C r v p ., C r O r r O C c i M O p pp r r r r V •cn z �O„4'f Cf NO{y OO W O V W O1`M1Np W p: 1+ A �O t0'. W m m r 4 N r C �. (6 C r C r fO M-1 1 a C7 m 2 >, ._i clE C7 05 g'ae 4. CY$ � m w.��CflGz.�gs"�r CD a w N N m rn Y cmm m o m —► y W��g�gmg�oo"�i m `�5'�c�'�g o'�i'''a'.N- � c L gyp• @ . O �P e C n.o G � p ax m�NOO pp p pp o 1� -�' 'Y� v'�' ��`,00.0��� mer1+. N'f N ��p 2 Y} -C NeA�'N¢{W�S¢ U ,/ �"tn..CJjCSO�O.OmSm m�;MN:N � W..fpiff�@ P O�^ga:QCi °� ;...�m�g�.m^mR mrWnouWi W .onm�r.+ao rte$ QUNU ki mQ' eWro' �i sg: g � � n. E -M6 u' O t tit - (D - Hill" �i 0.'4 ¢Cy Si O 4cx U C G�e�ly Cy^.1 C AAO N GO L? r. o OCp Q! S@ a1AylN p N OO@O N A�[f pM@Q@ Q t• x ¢S �� Q: O II1 S N^ ttA'i O 10 �: r I+f Rf A Q A 4 Hi t[i N D N N¢ Y e�Oa�T � G AAO � O 0• a• ile T F O r � N N g � lis O....g POOP: 1 S NU �og�mgmgm mom.a'•• "•',RR�o.n o4.aigovl+l•.0 voirO w m @ D d o •� F` g`��. d $ �... CJ e' "' per•.: v •y' r^n y'ECD �y o)—��^OE tI`�. v gni WS•o aam'U��€ a,�y C�0 in c 4 H8 .� VN m:6 1 o�.i~d' t Ir� �0.�'CtK �+ ''•�' g. g RCL U: d pg P p o. rte, u z i ,'g`"' c; tU i 3i o dk !w oQ Si cc ¢ 75 � Y d Q w q t CL 1Q G3 ♦ N O A M 1+30 AN @ 00@O @ �O A AU N U U T Pa� Pr v rma@,.n cl:l$pN lav Q8 @ �9 N iai (%7 tY. � C �3. 0. 1= fill ! $ a $ �nu u t0 ® �• ^ m v o o. Ucu o �Y ¢ l•`•� m v' $ �0 fD S Cep M �.^ W of 0 W CN C N.0 {y U 4' t0 J ��N OI v{'SS.TtiT� AGtO W� OOtV V:...Me� A:1CA V aV O � HT NOOWOO� eA•@c '0'^ oo.��.'• -U ^U. F Q r s++. r G LL'f <'*Y O � O. N c• N N � f m W g O O.OWi• M1 W r tMM1 O M1 F ID �D O C W O 0.. M g N lA•J� G C R" Q �O•. O m O O - r a N.�- �jppCLii IN ONON."' m OMOmt+iUMU g .2 in e poo mMosp.� Q O y y og �000 Fy O y p. t0 E $ in ��� �^'�'� ,$j •$ ffi �� �� a�� �U��U� E u.. $' ��© K o,,$'$t3.� > g d U�€€eco 4 wog�fac�i'�5ffigc"Nsw adN Ro () a CL t0 p .A i t g -o o, ono tom oo Np o AMwm S .+' A.gb �. o�^ a nom.^ :�mNe vi c3 t+i p3U.. N .Y ^^ pp� i^^.G T G C �^p �- r ti OO C N Gt N � C � ��W.$QOpD.$mSW OyiWNUOi C NOO�ON MO QI �p O Mmpp oU p¢ • �«-c '.oma c a o aN.- N ' � V �j W ��SSS SA 1 App O G G C O C A O W n m O O N O N N N i V m A no M co a N U 3 }�• d V FfrG O.g S O O O.O O¢ 3j 0 O U �p C a qj J?.—r JILLL �I�i ilf a « nonoonOonon NM nNN kkN ikk(kkx%� �kkx( xkxk' � Os OLG COO O 00 MNN Xo k X* F X X* ' v tnm nww w' m m* wF m u- �lotnooinoowo� .1G0 vlwMnn nNopopx 4 u 4M ..0- i0o, mv� -:ONO00 n O n O O n 0 0 n O n 0* MOM MOOm M 000]tp�N ggk _01000100010010 NM COM xO kkkuk k%itx ' pp _ * O * � O0'O O %X O ilii%%CGCG ii%ff iXC XX � > 3 i OQx Wx MF i M Uti i ti- O.N.O O.N- oo.N.ON i 100 � ��nnm ' X H W OfDUtD V+*i N. F0 N Ex Wx N Or v-) O -o-oO-X00.+0.+ c' co co* v* 0 00 vsMWoo' ix1i�t O u N .. GI � V x — — •-� •-� •' — — •• O — X % X ilii%XCCCCCC 8 ' 'O L 0' ux it NON OONOONON X X x k X X k i( G1 .. b q L 000W0o WOOWOW v ' it Xt OG t0j F' uo� 000 0000 o' kkk Xk1 kk xk xk kk kk %k kk %�+xk xk 0a'C.r _OOCOC ti c v * m* m ' p -.o-. oo-. m1n v1 o� F � Q lmyxvi* ni*N a � ... ..... wN � nWW oM aid * e xw * m* m x� o momoo�oo0mom x gx k % % x � �n o'n u�oo'n vi � R � •• k ' a � � * * Y i WF i v mx \� ..� � � •00 .. i .. .. .-� Sb2 4 W u= MOMoomooMoM u o; F' ++ U O o 0 0 O O O O O' Mill 9 o.� n..n n....n n . . i2 o * `� k * * v C xx 1. mx Wx 0 l UC o 1n O'0001000u�010 -^'N i OtCO it m : �.-'N4 X k * * + L vx Z ' O NON NOON N ''O ••Cnn XO ' O F % k * 0 %%% k W � VOM a d .8 : .. m *C* m.... O••'Cai->k0. Bol �OVF >m 40�Mago0�000�x Z.0 •• 'g-.6 0T»^' b' • U* N* U C •• O > 0] 'O •-' o' O' 0 U U* d a N•CAit NWON•.�0>y0 LCQ'O--� O++>UO3u++U G) 100 Tv'c 'OU TJ CGI +t * L* t0. x v O 19' L i� N' E 9 v- 6> U -. U ••. C g M L 9` L O O C' T •Y i Gi -. U' N 2 C >4 T N v b'm L* s0+ Uit d>'GDDC' h0 9 OW W'0�' 'dW > i>0CW>00 '"d44* d O i 0 0' 3.L t d 4+t 0 6* M6� 'vaa '>Lq V'-.Qd�-.owo.ac: ' VULu � UUd,�F> ' aNUaiVIM V]N6Q* Z MOOOOOO0000000 OM T Nm0 �tO �t �QX"• kkk* v wx o ^A:3 ' * N+t CCH ' N U� nonoonoonon u00 ' NWCMM i j k* POOCtOUr. Ux _ 0 C! MWnno xk1�kkx 0 i 0- C 3 � 'm wO X00 w00�0� .-i 10 nnM n ' u 0* N* N o0[0001000[OOW NM -Cox.: iC Xit ' e p* x rn* Gk i o wow woow w ' mM xo F N x x CNN O w U 7 b9 a •-• •• •• t0 M qF M U-. i WOW 00 W 00 W O W u]O ' 10 -.n MN i %XXX %Xk if C. iiMCC 4Un V x [-E Nw MOM OOOM O ' NWOWM ' kk1i%%%tt� kkXiiiGGG aFM * CdOx >* 0.�C . NO m m N3 0 uicR t x.xx mmWow: cov v o>x mxNtO�No R* a *.,* O 4 C' t0. 0 0 V'LOj 1.Ci W' y N � 5 jY* * * N i OAC' C NO NOONOONON ' n -'N NNN k0 ' OfDQ kit X U] ' O O o0 WOO kxO 1000 3 o T o •.N. x Tit v — ~ — — — XX lift W • N* iG OOOOOOOoo00' 11tt 1Xt ox ox kk XX jQQX��ff XX iXxt C OF ' Cx Ux x V1 'tla00�0 cOOtO t000t0 N X k X X X* Ox k X* * a+ 0 L> CAx \ x * C v ' d "'1 Cx V). 6 O 0l ' 0.0. NO NOONOONON ?x Ox * H ' U ' NON NOON N ` �♦ ✓x \x 4 :04 �..M I_, 1: 0 XX XX %x � •O i%C a ikC xk kU. N.t O ' C O OO MOO MOOMOM ' b7 -.N ' NN kn 1Nt06 k kit i( * L * vx Z ' O non noon n ' .. MMM o o 0000 ' UOW a x 6 .. .. .. m••o0 v•-E:00C 'mod•• 41m••m> do vm wox m x wx mx z u c o¢� o �r:,.. a>°= . T>v CLOU wsq.^°a u =Qapcacx 0 a 00 m* my oy.. v>,cm>�gLi�avo >° uus �"u U� �o_tnOTv'0U, 0Z*a M. v 0 8' '0 O- Q> u •-i ' 0 U ••. C 8' .0 GI ' J G1 3 u v h N L 7 N Y G) .. u G1 y 7' GI T L G1 L L b L L Lit a0+ C OAC ' N O b N G) b C ' 4 W > '> O C m> 0 6t L 0 6 6* N' o N L C9 m q NS5 O•- ' L 0 O C 0 0 0 0' G13 00 O.Comw dd+ 0 VV W UUO. ."cF> ' aNU aKmrnmWQQ» '{ MI �,�__ C; u 50 `7 —� �c- �^ � � � �.� � ^ tp � � �n mud tD eCa• M O Q4 � � 4 AO_ pj 00 m.� m �.S` .E •= a --loss -los,mRNm R ,^..o- �000�o OTf eaoo,ogmm¢. �; vr�i Si 3 < F 21 m o I O r•G C 4'NfQ YOO. t�Tljj O N �`tiy d O drOQ- O� q O Oi. Qmi ®CO9 N Ouli �.. �[f N O O [V O• O Q.O> O M pTp (i eppi (,) -91 d 01� ems• •• O o w' p � 1 ` q � � Q `4 V 4 i>ggm 'i ata30f cOf NOf QiOQN. �O NQ. i� c10.0' �O K! to _ � O.O vx O^ O� N. s• C M 4 C..e� � N N Cw ID f0 �r a O U J^ N in tn�.n.,r'o d� .c ��j'Udc.sE a'O ggg'''�'06 �'dt�.g�g.. •S . 1€�. �= d Jr Zvi 3a'q S1�.'o ui.�.lnod.aI2na�n�•'¢w.avSF D. M o y u111 --P 1.'1n M f0 f0 ¢ y q�.O ^ O Tj O. eL f>i O N O O 1\ C":; E". 1 O5 m O¢ c pS Oopo00��p @ 04 Arm pp O O pp OCp.O O r N-� O <. a+f 0 �: O !•` O R O M. F�^ 1C tG C � N C G n }+• � 0 �r 1 � .$90g CgC0S4OO1p t�tlO ua m 0000 O Oua tAMO¢O¢ �� � s�Of o o� o mid-oa. '� ooMA e�,*-•oed ., c� S >,o' E m �,� x W ua ci rL :O ♦ g vo b 0 N M Oa W p)tH C• 0000 a ®i�lQ N N¢N¢ c a C}.p Oi T 1+^j q q. p firy ., too o,�StB epi, 8cN,11n ems m �n,�.o a c;omo.o �� ¢m CC CCpO.f FFxx all M N Oi.O IPSO O: Omf n Opf O�iOP :.ice AO a S.Q :SCOP r Si O IL iO C N �U o^ S e eO M C " Gp pp ua � o �, � e•s :o o a ca vv, v O gg N N C i r;z 0� N I' 0 N p ^ O O ui vi^ C^0^ O O 2 x q: p gm f ^ ^ ^ 41% � C}.p Oi T 1+^j q q. p firy ., too o,�StB epi, 8cN,11n ems m �n,�.o a c;omo.o e�pp C� FFxx all M N 3a a S.Q :SCOP r Si O ti iO o^ cp G e eO M C " / M o g nd � o � o ua � o �, � e•s :o o a ca vv, m 1% U 3W1nvi¢c ai- Qwc(�i 9'>a>�O 0.^ OC C fV N N C Y"! e�pp C� FFxx all M N G? a S.Q :SCOP r Si O iO m 1% U 3W1nvi¢c ai- Qwc(�i 9'>a>�O a x v o 00000000 x x x* x CO O W O O m O W X X kky, k kx ikkkkXG Xx kkYkY,, ��xXkx(+ kXkXkk X X # * ••* 3 I C .ti 10-+00-0•+ ^IN tOM M OC'Q I k'xOC'Q WNN �* * M* W a # O a u W O W o o W O W X X %* X k# a mav# L a v o Wo0oo0 m xxx C I Lo .-.# .-.# p7 O W O W OOmO W 1 u X 1 I k at i n 3 I Q* v# F 1 1 Ui o Y 3 l a 0* » a# w l c 0 1 ooao00o0 ... •va o 0* : ma a o o o 0o x X a X >�# c° uro l W# # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I k x rn 1 4 L ,y� 1 "'x # Lir •C � 1 O I O 0 0 X kX ?¢k$ �kC �¢k$� %X t0�t 7 ww V TOa * 3« u I i m 7O i .. .-I .. X % % X jx �I % +.X( ¢r % 5 X 4 u+L+a : * LF aco 00000000 ' I S? ' x* H x x# oi*r o r -i .-i ,� .. x l "a x x *" o c I c mu I ; # o rn 00000000 = r x X* xa % * �* ro l o c v •o # # o* m o 0 0 'RS 'RS 'RS i'S� Q N* r* W# rn 1 0 I �� _ x 3 N W 10 ro# s0+# C — — C o COOCOC Nm P' O I C OCOOC C 1 InNNO x Ir k X X * �* W M. 0. a •o ro m o o W. 77xC{ %kk %x w F N W a a 7 bCD'O o •• •.• •.• a0# tn* �* WO I N ^^ I Oo0o0000 Ino I NN h 0 1 O �e %# x.-InCC7C W # •.0.* 1a * �« N oc nn • 1 aW * O# 0 1 y NO NOONO N I OCu'J N W M N I F u x x# x p* O# V# ,Z WOW 00 W W 19 ••NhnM I O * ixxe' 7C ir�CS I I 1 1 I o» m as o v W w� ••-M 0# v # a � •o W v ko ra I o a • • a � rn m > M.:, C, * c # 0� » a# W .... 1 0 vw •• (1, H I > IO o 1 dw 0 •• W v=O=.4* 0# L I Uir # Z L 1 i •• I =..Q •• 7>.Y I "' I u U = 1U 7 Ca L Lit C# 0 7 1 O# O# U C I •• O 9 O I ro ro o l ro\ 0 C d 0 U U# d 4 a W a N O B i O W N i 0> L ro 6 '0 0 > I M; I .. U U O tfi O >i 0 9 9 U V ro 0# # g Q> U .-� I O I U •� C 8^ rn 4 A e 0 0 0 0 0# w l Cl * L# o L G1 1 1 L o I C O 3 Y L 7 ro 1 1 1 '+ I ro Y> 1 0 >� u N L L b L L L# W v# La> I cm Wo vwWvc l...,. I aw > 1 >Warn>W'd ro �# >* ao I o 0 o W L a v,xx v L o I W c o 0 0 1 v3 00 0 aX: C aa# z» ¢# rilQ� 1 UC 14 I >xco ..Owaxw c�Uw I UUw c> I aNUacn v)WrnQ Q# -— vx0 0 rn � •0 0 v # rn* xo u a * n 0 h O O n 0 n W k�* it m l # # _ir F UO NONOON N x a x LL « a 6 a u # # ••# 3 1 1 C N O NOONO� 1 .rN 1 COO. -I I I x # oCQ oa1Q YXKX. # m# �o * # O# 1 NONOO NON -0O � rnOrnOOrn rn O* #* O* C O0 I u 1 � 0 F I U O 7 # I L.. O i 0 uGG i W 0 a a N a W i 0 03 1 -Ci t+01 i Y i C?a < Gla Wr 11 l i a o f 00000000 I I I a '* o co 1 0>0* # 0* a 1 0 0 1 N N W 0a # 00000000 k k y. y y* a La O 1 7 W# YVi # fY. O o o O �kYjt, ',Y� Ik! * V o Ow0 i 11 3a 7 I 10100 •-I �•• �S gg ,r5 iXC K * la N w0 o 0 oril a W .� 00000000 x x x R# `r X x* * oi*r I O a a H I U O 1 O 0 0 >* a a a l 1 0 tC-1 0 C 1 7 roU I L # # 0 I (n 00000000 I x x X x# 1 a La S4 i m Na Ma Ma Vl a. 0 : O 00 kx xx x Q�j # •p i X i w a C x a# it A a _ O I W 1 0 # Y* * C C a 3 I a w Ca # # O C 0Ni Op ti00NON Nm W C W. -I Xir XX # a u > �* Za a �` F H i .0.7 Ca \* ..* Q I I m a0 ti -.0 1 x i a i*r O# reit ,c# m v�•-- 00000000 Ino minrno = x x# x--�.rinQlnQ+*t Ta O# F I U .-i 1 ''SZ . U# +[i# > 4 I ole O 00 i ~ W'V' 1 hO I p a0iorn rn # of x* 0 U# L 1 1 1 O I # # �# O# O I fn 000000 o 0 1 7CN I mm W 0 I # L# O* x v* ,Z rnOrnOOrn rn 19 ..Orn W.-1 # y Xu I I O# n# a l O W M d# 1 I N# C# b# 1 0 0—". X X% t0.a W a® a•-� •• iN - 71 '• v.+•• "Na Oa -� 04WOBeG�I UUF 0 C. .. "' 1 M .. O > "'1. a)m p00# ro o'Ci C# w� aUa�..Q.. I > W1 0••m OGO.C�*O# > a y OI #O#O# UCI•• 0 b -• 01 WroO Y 10\i0 C d0 UU#d�*# YI #Wit mit 1ro010W•• O>A 01>I�U31 UOI to O>.Ob VU9rob# O I Lit ro# O 0 r I L W e Q> U •.+ O I U C 6 1 rn LA 6 0 0 0 0 0# ••* W I o* 4# O L O I L o 0 3 1 4 0 ro 1 1 Y .+ ro 0 0 z l 0 >� Y y L L •0 L L L# * v# La>I0_mc Wo vww'ocl1>rocrn>roWLW"'a# C* ># 1"' 0 1 0 W I O W L o W x x Gi L L 0 1 (G 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 O L L L L "' Q. 0# 6# .1 "'o IUaa 1>xUl-IOWOi 0.'W 1VVW 1VUM. :m> 1 a N U acn rn M cn Q Q#Zit I- e W•Ormi'a0 k# Fa kif# a• 7 WbO O % X X # V) ^ 00000000 ' t00 ' Nu0 u70 ' k W WNfONNW# Fo m o'er .. .... io<r comm0 X atno� # W Y3 1 : N 0 •-�o•-'oo-+o-+ -+� coOu�M •y��+ k k X X# # W N .-'O--iOO.. u7W NO k k# F % W # ..U. i#t >t a O kk' a iXC Wit 'p NONOONON NM W w wC G# # V]# 9a t O MOMOOM M ' OM NOW ONO kY, Y• XY• Y,# Wit # O* VI a' G 4, Y< •-'# 0.0j i W ?-• 00000000 ' mo: ONif X# CGCNO>0.t O� W W 3 od* W# F ' U.+ 0 00 0,0100 xxif� if Fm, # it toM M X X atOO O O W NOW 00000N ' .. tp ' Na•CI) N •• ••• 0 C •-• # Wit O 00 W W I O ' ki kkk .�. i CQ 0— .M_, N Ni#t * 00000000 X X� XX x `�# F Y, kit i#t U Q) ' U L C,N # V# •p K' O' O O O X 1 RYA ' if t.v0 0 -, 0 N U 0 •+ i' M o.O. WM OO�oO� WM o WO 0 N .U m ' ikXkiff i%iff k`%%�k ik%kxf iiff kkY, k# a �kk• X k #W## 0 ' k x C ' a pU ' V1 # 0 i CU O 00 00000 0 w x ' 6 V) a ' 0 0 ' O 99 W i O..U. WOO OONOW I x 'C.p iWOCD#p# *00.'' O' MOMOOM M' % k aai V)* Li#t m9w9O N N O W OtD k kif k;f %if Xif kk ; 0 # .F.1 X X# i#t 9 i#t Wit F' CMJ i#t ..C, st U Y U O N O N O x J 0 H M ..-i M .+ .-i M M iiKCCC kkXk'' %%k% iiXXCC ii%%fC iiXXCC X kkkk'' Ox Ni#t Z r O ' 00000000 i'a0 o#N# # a t o o i2 il o.i#t X k -a X —> XCW.* 0 » -' # W a .. CI .... W t R C. 6 a -� •. W -+ W W •-i ..-M* # 0 +t 6tU0 > O C. ••M W••W> CLO Wm WO* W i '�: q* p .. o ••bw e o 7 FW- W dq 0 •• W Waoca# m« L U# z A •• ' ¢ •• 7> C' U G U ' w u U 7 C a A A# O# U C' •• 0 -+ 'd O U U t U a) O G d o U U# d* Y i Wit W]* p W' O N .. i W> p Q 'O O >_ ' U U 3 t ..+ „ U W' M 0 >> W 'O 9 U V 0 W# a L# p# 0 2 6 L N 6 Q> U 0 U• c B ^ pl L A 6 W W W 0 0# W' W*L# W 4 W' Y A W' W 3 Y L a p' Y Y p, Y W _a ' W >> Y W L LTJ L L 4# Wit W it L IL> ' C bq C' 0 0 W W'o C' ••+ •+ C• w > > W C 0 > 0 W 1. IC C. 4 it it ># CLO i 0 N O N L C v a'7 W L I. O i tp C 0 0 0 W 3 O O 0 s s c .0 C, C, # 0# 6# W do ' Uaa ' > W U'- 0C4 C. 0.5 W ' UU W ' UUCLt> ' .4mQ—v MWW 0QQ# zit # # #7 7 N O N O O N O N N M W •• # k GDR G W C 110 O i O 00 NM .n-iNNO i # y'. X # # a ya v o � # # o* o a f f W ' _# P7F ' V) U.-, i 00000000 ' t00 ' NM Mo ' fixii(( �kii(( C f�NN W W 00# co ' W i#t N OtCi O 00 to ' Nw to k X# .F.1 tv000 O i#t O # 3 ' m O0000000 ' •-'uY t mvmm i k ai# UI Momoom M wNMo # F u# a o r.M NWN k a # W# 'O -o-cc-c- c- NM N---7 tC.e w Wit p C i c W ,-� .-i .-i NM i OMOO�O Y W i#t + 0 i#t N p i i 00 0 0 ' 0 i#t W 3 Od* w 0> W VI •-,- momoo m O m i t O ' W" ' �f+ # 0401 NiO P7NCi# F ' U •-' ' NONOON N ' W MNO ' �Ii X% x 6i#t i#t .11 i#t 0 ' ' 0 H 0 W T i NNW X X .F-7 t0i000 O ' 7770000 % M t Y 3 a• # # W ' VI COCOO V'O.�r -+t+7 ' NOI�N i kkX' kx# 70%• �kk( W# O �O i V2. i#t tWtlx a O i ,.-iO.r00.� 1�m i N00n00 10 ap+ 0i#e # ft 00000000- U l a p# to P:' 'W O D1 L X i C. W# L# 'O t )X C: lift o y oo e-* of c _ W .. x N O w w U'O# # 3# 0 i 0 :3 N O N O O N O N ' if %; k if i if it F if X X# U W i w N A ' U Y i#t i#t F C C 0 i Oi O 0i O O Oi Oi ' ikXS i?`$ lift iiXff iiXtf %XX ,iiYt( �,�QGj N i L ..� .:. > W * i#t # 7 i i U nr # c ' a ttU ' L V)# # 0 C ~ =O W 00 W ON ,-'N P.-, if iXX2 i#t ^6 rn vi#r » N# W 0 0 Oo �.. .�..0 OWdH 70 ONd .N. i#r ..0. i#t N # VI W N U O •-•# 0* Cit 3 Ci w c +#t pit x p a. 0 0Ni O.N., 0 0 N 0 iXf iXf •ii��f ix%f X it iif( Wit # C .W. W .w O O # it y it 6 F W r iCi O N 00In0 ' kx 1 X 11 1 lift ixf •0 a a i`ti`t aa° ° iiikxf iYf, i�ifff lift lift �F CGO' tOOWOO[0 N W%' X' tiff iXC' ti WI, U# o ' c 00000000 :1# %# o f # w* 0 0 _ o7 7— : zs q�.-. •• '� Q Wy '•o• ..afi>oy7 �I mmmia t'oy .; 'p: p m 11 W AFrt>W> vaaW O�iriL'#:» •W7 u L) &u a ca 1'o a UU#oWoW• * CUW0 OAa'0 00#0W0N0,43U WO fiNW 000# C >t W L 'OW W N a p W W L > WC N O W'0 o##i#t Y > V) *>#YO.oto p'OpL�WCC a7W LLO�pC000� 03010 OAAAA dd#0# d# W d� ' c�aa ' >00 U' -'OP. Cr P4 W t UU W t Q,609=> O.g> ' aNUa�m W W W dd# z# F mNoo. � ® o ni®Qdp SQ N@^Y�S S�@NO D OOM@ Nv{ o f CUOU ppl�C Y Q1 o r eC r r MMC C C.r r N P ME d • d O r � dd •� r'Iil. O p• Of �...� P Of R O� M@..O W p O Ci Q O ^.! f� M G M ` d $ N in S �r m r C r sn fir' p ME a t pp� pO pp y� U Gi M. V'O�f Oi ORSA �ONi lD tO.tn @ ccOOnI4 tC� iD O`W Nte�tettU �1��133.0 C CG'rM x.Nj GM @ NNO b OMO@N N a .� _ 4\ , r mr OO, � C fn NIm 19 s LL 111 yp,a U v (g = E 4+. L A& `'T d N d ✓ �Gv � a 1 .9 S1 11 C.i (L &3 ro{L I at'i. 'S 8 1�0a'C� 26i 3'� 2uE.atri�a¢��an'¢wcS>a»fes s¢ d LL� Q. O •, C. m V) (' epa pp S O f OOf n a^+I C) t p 1 D M O f Lf O O O O G O 00'f O O @MUMU V 1+ C OO :. 0• N N $i C e0 C d Rig, 6 pp �tpp FGF ` i� @ 8 O$ u f 0� •' � S m N p Q€ N 0 0 0 0 N M O_ N S@ O U S� U O@ C pOf t� 1� ((ppONYY N 0000, @@ trNNppM@(,�pU LE Q ®� a ES'•O� O � S O.. Oi �Q� t@H TSn C'at'M@ tb p 140 � OOOfff r.0 r0 r OO NNC O'ONr N N �f C f r.. cs C N • o d �x �� d SSSyyy E to 5 O g O E Ts" _ (75 P- or - +n R' CL C..qq'.hm,o @oU MoNg.woov oNo��m^m ca0 N of r ink6t��msaa J U lLC H V F * * MO�00�0� NM nnN * n.+1nm it * 0 00 1010 �mm� 10 M C' t0 t0 �( V' O 1D C * it m * 7 bOp b .� O •.' 7 •-' ^' •-� O .N. iiXXCC X MOMOOM OM '00 kx X* CG •+mo- 00 ' * _* m O M OOM O M i Omm o 00 OMm C 10 C C t0 t0 i * m # ; 0 00 10C W NN� iiixCCC o-7 i%4 Oro. i*t Uf*t 0F O it it •• * » u* 3 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % X x¢ 0 00 In a O C O n0 nOOnO n NM NM MM k� k* F % ks NO NOON N MM O kkk�� iG iC 10M NmmO X 1C. i*t x Wit G C 110 w' ++ * m* O O m a w c o m c rn N M from O 00 1000000 k* F k k* mF M i MOMOOrnOO) ' 100 ' NO nN i kk Xk C.K ulMrnmrnm* i N 3 0 ' 06* m+ N Wi*t x a x x O 00 10C au'1X* .F.110O•-' y* O * b6.00 0 O ' iiiCCCC YY% •ryxX! •-, * M i 3 0 ^'0O^-�0.� NO ' �(* aONCUCU* C 0�9 0 NASO 0 m m m* 0 ; • ••� 0 ' C -�* m* * 3o- mN MOMOOM M i � I �* � �* * X N 7ww i UT7* 0 0 7� W NN~ iQ� ixC %k O q * m ' .C* * ro N t0ot00oMOM x g* 0 00000 O ' % rA.' N i � SC — O ...O G rn 4 x 0. mro tix 'O� N OT CO COOCC k* F* aFaF o 10 0a 11o 'mOCo f +**� W MO mF* 0 m O0.. vM d0Cv Xk CM 4M OM 77�k77y5CC��( xxX ^' m' * uj*'• � 0 ikG i !' X%% X i % % •• k* % « z o .OO -.i 04UL XkkiXxxC NU 0-0 s0GOO *+ O vm»* * nrniXC rniXxG 0iX7iX(�(, m* Om 7C x 11 * C*N* 0* * m 7 •• d .•.. mT 0'd6 O.. •• i m -� 71 •: m.. Mo- 0* 104 0. U**. Q*.ZNA �+i �•-�6m0>O�UU di �wdta C••tdwpp❑mO p�m NW u i wF ..* i i o p ; ro* U Os 0 • v>A-C'0 O fi' Y t+ N' 6 .4 Cz try* m v 4> C b0 Oro •-�N..m7'mT�'mtA 0 mWw -0 CroL'LAO ORdGL�0 ** o** x* C* * mkkx m — F i U.. i 100100010 WOMOOmom 10; a kkx * wit o xx iYx�* O C O W O MOOM O mmMmmO 00 y O m O *0* 0 i=9 y 0 i —W 1>1 m-'•••+M mfiv Uit Osit Z ¢^'im m..e''Y•• UU O G,•GMW > - d0 mm mo* v*** 7m O''a mL00a*11 y ' m* v* *N*m*+•'0N'ON••i A •• U C ' •• � >0 O •d O CM U U* O'* m>��6V0 >'Uw3' U Umi ¢> U U •� q g .. 100Tm'O'OU'O O ro* m L A B m 0 10 0 0* •* i m it it > L L m' A m' a o 0 10 ❑ i 10 3 �-' L 7 ro' Y N •+ m ••+ m m 7' m V1 0 m W W b ' ......._. ' 4 w > C T ++ m L L b L L 4* m > ro ro (. ro G Q. w .yCi + * Q* NQ,�c N O ' UO4a ' >mU'-'SaOraw ro L .C� m x x m 0 0' m V Uw ' UU4c> ' aNUarm 3 00 0 A A A .0 d d* Z o- V1N M66* H V F •+0.+00.-'O—NM mmMO .. it �01 o 0 00 1010 �mm� 10 i ? i r 1) % m * .-'* m M -O+ MOMOOM OM '00 kx X* CG •+mo- 00 ' * _* H UO Omm o 00 OMm C 10 C C t0 t0 G * m # W O tCi .r .r .r 00000000000 * * m* tE N* * M* •• U C O n0 nOOnO n NM NM MM k� k* F % ks NO NOON N MM O kkk�� iG iC 10M NmmO X 1C. i*t x Wit G C 110 w' bb 7 0 mF M i MOMOOrnOO) ' 100 ' NO nN i kk Xk C.K ulMrnmrnm* i N 3 0 ' 06* m+ N Wi*t U.-' i O 00 10C au'1X* .F.110O•-' ' O m: .4 N OH o ' ' O ' iiiCCCC YY% •ryxX! •-, * M i 3 M COCOOCO C i .*t0 C.-'10 0 k* mit O O GL1 i C * m* > MO V100N H ' 01010.+ 0 Q)x xx y� * a* * 3o- .-m� � I �* � �* * X N 7ww i UT7* 0 0 7� * L* w� O q * m ' .C* * m L- F ' UO t0ot00oMOM x g* 0 00000 O ' % N ' k a w« S42* � SC � h Wo- Clo- G00000000 � } '= t0 1*r Mo- No- M n a O 3 m w ** 'Omit 10 : : 0 ..0, -C-00-0- % * + ^' m' * uj*'• � F ' v ter .. * � a* Mo- CR07 ' '0 0 �?, � X i % % •• k* % « 0-0 O o -N i •. rn10N� 10 7C x * C*N* 0* * m 7 •• d .•.. mT 0'd6 O.. •• i m -� 71 •: m.. Mo- 0* 104 0. U**. Q*.ZNA �+i �•-�6m0>O�UU di �wdta C••tdwpp❑mO p�m NW u i i Nit Wo- 10, i T>1J dU w 0�* 010 a0U9 ro* U Os 0 • v>A-C'0 O fi' Y t+ N' 6 0 uU N i 0 Tv'O t0 0i Q> U ++ o' U C e' O L A e m v 10 0 0* pus+ Q) L 4> C b0 Oro •-�N..m7'mT�'mtA 0 mWw -0 CroL'LAO ORdGL�0 ** V UO AroL*a 1=1 L CNxxL 0 0 C 000300 A C -Ow P. W ' UU W ' UUw=> ' aNQ-4 V)M V]m<<. Z* H V F * AH ^ a p o 00 co o ,0 00000000 X x* a k x* X$Q5 ^* W * 400 mocmou Nm - V) ** MV]* f0O�00000 f0 NNNO X LC.i wi K o C W [OM M nno* a u* O* 0 00'00 C " * ^* 0.l ' Vl •-0• - 00000000 V) O ^ M N o C. n^ M U M U ro 3 o<. W* F U^ 0 0 0 n m o* F n c o Q. >* +� o.� my IMO ac.:� ••+ 0 � C * W* V7 o tDOOt0 u) � nnu9 XX %% O W i+>* i Ui ti U iL+ N ro N+ * t+i moo�oOmo m X X k* X Wi C.* otiN mo¢°c 3 i o 0 o W O 0ro =Oo.. aoo.�o OaNo o rn cooN yH C UO N i C >M00000000WN kXk %xkXfix= kkY, X5 kYk, kXX Xkkk ** +* Wu Cro 0 roU 0 V, 0* roW » o« C X* i i aW poi * s•O� o o o Oo * a O * u ro v x k wF m mi \* 7 '00.. �� X X X X O* q* W* roF a U^ MO MOOMOM i xXxY, kx i 7. xX* kk* > * L C C M0,00 N V �( * 0 0 iC %% xi MR N* 0 C O nO nOOnOn C ^N W NNtD NN6 k x �.* O* .-�* v* z 0 nO noon n b •• u7^.-�O W H % X* O* M 000 o — a YX. kX' C•* O ii w "v ai v vi W* W* a � � a v e � oco � � o c-- G• � fn 'M ro c.cWAOA vvi vo* ❑. v i Ai 0 .. 0 -•vro •• e o c [-� > roro aA o - •• a* v* " o* z.c .. �•.,¢ ..�>•., c v acs wL v c CALL* c* V v* v* u a o v• o m mW O4 We oi"+ L++ mW W +3+•+� 4 ¢> 7 ^0 Y mV^ o•>a" o u u"** a» u-0uMW*ou u q M> •^ W We m " a eWv9v o o* W mo vwwvc �-�-� awu> >mcv>>mv"m o. o.* i >* o. o c W oro , c Vi C17 ol W "" o ro c O o o W 3 0 0 o L .CLL MM* z a * Q* v�¢,s c�za >roU^5c. a.xw L)U UL)C.A> aNUaC In V) V) V)¢Q* i a o 00000000000 i of 0 a 00000000 g¢ u�* a x�* w i m i 0 H 0— oO 0 0 o ikC %x it o2x `a ?�2x$ v* * u* NE, Vl O 00000000 i i Wi D 00 k x ro* i Ni ^ C O OO�OOOt0O tD NM X000 H * "* w* a C v W * < O * 7 5.0 O CC ty. �i i ^i roO ' Vl ••C^- 00000000 L0 c! mom o x c� Winn ron ro* m ° c z W* i > "ro o °o °' " "" x anoo o 55 o x 7* * * W V] N ONOONO N d't0 �h�Mh o c^* * W* aowooc c mcoo o oA>i i mi a o .. .... nom `rmmo `� R W 7 W m a4 '0 O mOMOOM M m " c Y dro* i 6* L � ti X� i � X �* o 11 i ovi i 3i 7 � .8 � ^ ^^ K JJCC R i N C W U b# * * O 0 7 x k x w N O oq*o* * ro " s O s O O " 0 sl' kxk k% kkkXk F i 0 H O i 0 0 0 M^ .Mi ' C i l t0U li.i o C O 00000000 v Y u Wi i C0i*t ++`"a A O Vlo 0o X_ a2 a ^* i N* VI X 3 i Ww � O roi ^i C 00000000 X X iC x k* +t i a5 ❑�** vi roF " o�ooomOm o xi c dou i 0 C O* .*i v* •'� A q'O V'OOC C i m - m• gNNO W F % * O* a no UO n 7 7— ••0. i W i W i '7O N W -. W 0 0. e 0 -+ •• W •-� W W •-� .. •-� V] i e ••O.�V)••W> C.O WV)WO* v i a+* Ai o .. o ••bro •- fi o 7 _F > ro ro aA o •• m WAOAa* - �� Q ••C> GiY UC.0 AWL U7C-a LL* u * Wit W* U C •� •- O b O ro t0 A t 07 \ i 0 u C O' O U u 01*00* roW �ON••�W>L�Q90 �i�U3i uUW� mO TWT. '0U'0c ro* C' i "* ro* N 0 6•u O A U C fi� O( L fi W W W O O W F W .0. W 3 ++ 7 ro u ++ •-. i C •-. W W 7 W >> - W w w •O " c. w ¢ * W* "a> cenc mo vw vc t..•..•.• i C,wu>-• >rocin>mro"roo.o.* ci >* o.o '= m om"amzma000 >I, oLLLLo.Q.* Q* v <n va >roco oP.a� P. i uU uUOw=> .4N,.4=m JV n¢¢* F n k W F FL m Y � O r p' TGrr. r O :NNC MQ L1N N N in f: PIE � T CrOr G � NNC OOCi T.r N Q @ �OOrGr G NNe�r OCl ONT � T €5, O W iN^: Qi S � P O �� Tai —• N p 1 l `$Mg@OO in T m NNG@ ONgQUf?U o { C p k 71 C 1 r; C T G r C n- O G7 i7 M M Q f.;r+` �j P i' N eOC m m T � � S O. 4 V� Om 12 1': (d. C� IP d{ YY �f �'W � O mAy U O � $ �f 0 ma a W g rz K E$c ry� " Ci Sr S>_ �Wtci Rica d¢K �aAl �� �CJ�a>>_.5�� � xx¢�iu uK C vi r tp r O r 0 O O N T N N X } NNO@MO�PN� N C�. e OOiff YC.1 U C . C f+.:S Sf+Op m. P¢ 3 4— '�'m�,vSof. uff�mN mmvf @rw CocOno� �$oo�$o U®U 0 rOO e..,Cr C NNC o"O Cir � N �. G E � C r y 1 po C Y cp1ff O S� [[f' C`� T: cion fn fno@f':B Ci fN+f ,-m nmi S Q f Wa O u9 U OVa r G n VT 4 C+m...8 Q O WO W Of N @ fy' foj Q W r tR M {mil fN•.' f� ¢ m t N Ql O r r G M M O 9 G r O E.?h N g- oNovfo fnMOM Pgrc5 en enr enm m' �mra. onc o c Qi 6 M c M ani � c -a �c S is N c "a!A :ar-� N6 ui hi t�4 4 MA 1 r4 Q.11 Is, SB i H 0 . - pt in , a so . cm nb 0 6 ci CS p O O O p O c; O O j ci o° nnr�n min u! z c o o c a coo c IL dY 7n A pyl U All ul En Vlmm us 0 in 9 li i ai n 'n N pi ci i v m 'c A mason .'i m m.t us 0z pus OooO U9 Li u! . c Li Ui q U0 1 E 6 M Qj I N N 14 Ili i r! 14 i 1 N r." N Z Imn 1 1 . 0 w a rL1. m E Of U ul W En < th c Lis w > a c Is u nP o -ji m ge i g A m cc E mc!c! C) zo IL E " xx =T U9 6n Q > z La, -C III -C i 4. �o N c� cl IR I iq I Ll n N 14 14 M N us N W O I Us P. n u! Lq ima,U1a nmmn I mamm u! o a o p O o G c; O O o c c c; 0 c; c; c; c IL a Is I to i I In I ®° m¢¢ eD < < as < < w mm us Us 'll w us q-, !3 'm tn w tis us R q t sh c! Us T. Ul mm m o m W, 1 us 6 c; d c; c o NA 4 .5 f4 g4 > E' 0 U) J2 0 C 1 W M V E U q- LAJ W C7 O 0 E m f ic Ln E :c z -'2 W Vim S c V c 1w cL I c a j* 1 c oMmm s- cc 2'm > Z m fin, tu =4 LL =9 4 UTI .k 1 m Appendix IF Future Road Diet with Signal Improvements Level of Service Calculations Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah June 2009 w -trans of oyZ �r,00Q. u OL 6v 4% +Z72.�O�OO NTN O�OWip O� O �Nm �.MN N..M .W@WoCi` O Cre�� Ory C® W O C.Or M1 Q k�. y r ti. pOOIliYx C }?Q �OOO. tlf pyo`y $.� Mncc G ,. O Q 0000. fin 2 N� a o. w AAA Cy 6. e p y� C 0 cn r �r. -6 rj N - o G yp� g ul, C5i a- 0) ce =N NLCN 94 4C d. ..IQ d aNi j N o- M1 i ON N t0 OF Y IF vg) S2 C c. fir., cc�d o w E a r r r r C M1 M1 C C C N r d Cl tW+f OO. f` Q �S< ~ ��*�o;$m$mo2r� n N gno�M^Gi o�M1'+oN�am`� ^c� 'te r m x` u �pNp. OS WO®ON C}Nr: off C WOOOOO �i PI^Op off U p< $ r OSt CMOOM y N r d r o ,_ ci ch07 $ v ygLL v� �U.. �g 1 -I'M c4a SOev- O m IL N rd F CQ C p C Os C O M e a cy� Cf M O - M M ®d d 1 m. .�NO�SCO�S� ONd�N N ��G� M tV �- OMCON�N 6 d ��,,.Y C O C ONO N ri d,g mo00 2'i o ?G �,'.. 1 c U v R ® O eC / Ti y �� g I�N;�urnoW,..�+d,$ mN�M�... e`i.'-„g�vo'�oy ,��y. o•o- $amt^ ;, R. faW O p pp�� O tom 00 N:tif N t -r OO.O i+ ��-00 M O N r. N @',� tp aY C SST tD u @ �N N NNO @ Nil CiCNr N : -% MO Taea OO N � O pp � iI � tig0 O 9 mS N S N Chi ett � n.0 W r r OO C n1� p Os tD 07 W m � y��j, c:; Cf @iii W O O A OO N J wd N 71 ( �"Q..g 000 O ^�i MOM f'yM WfJOWf OO.N@@OOOMM(yj uU. c c WorC; c � r r 16 $� � w $ c�, Ecy'4m4 � T E �'•�Q�m va (nY r`1i 5u 4gsd..0 t'�JSCL y�Va� L)�. 76Sc ,�a ''m OcL 61 °�' Edi: =ci 9a=��u R!c'Paccaaawac»>>>�S¢x¢� rp c C _� �'gf`11^Of "'PG O.SNS�OWr W.� NNC@M Op C(Oyor{Nyu N� f�” �yy �pp p WQ� T O' Y � O�ja r.CTCt�,,, Or C O CMrr@ ih c t w;$ mryoo ^ci qu Rik c CO /m �I�.S �Oi. S O. CNf O Ot1fi• O OtHi W O �: S'j M 00 m M1O O O N C t00 � S� W' G3 E Y ro�o� o aL m�vest+i rc oM.=e@-� r 4;e90 o$M.$�^m`oaii, m o®tot c!nR.:2Qam v N N C Mn r �' \�'�iCggrn�mn mu`oio 1Leoi.'- °?zq W qa N� nM°ma,^•f,�' _ `� �`; {V � f•; C1 Y' tP$ OMi tC00 Krq" app^p�tnco. d U C Ot r r fV r r V bN W r^. $ �.$ m m � rn w o® ua ryo o a ari `v+,. , u2 Y rG�Gt`O C O OMr w cn Tar. 0 I: a=�o� p� N C N _ Q E to gcv}9j4S$G $$ �L 2 pa dCi Q ce n N WE, � �M�QO WO�SOfTM'MN_�..N t0 n�N��MO rvoSS�OU OU �"" n 0 N .� .. '.o�o�.oNosNav ��m:^ti-'euro Moo�os"'v IN O 4� E�N�b0`,90MfCl0i m� 00D G�MCy OfN4@'0 N m���0'....M� OM mQm OT�OUIOU .. am, G N 4 C E. R r` �u ai o g C<;' _q. [o Q O C! S p^� S p^� Of � � O m �nj' p��• @ t� t00 N b N p m p m �T {O� U � Q p 2:1N op C fA r. Q, ^ Ir r C O M Q � f` CR V ro Q. R •��C V) a. mm EEffi o �+ C LY }g�� . E1LLmvVE u C Corridor Performance Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan Traffic Study for the City of Ukiah June 2009 w -trans U ti; a� Y' N � d In � i � N Y u O G D ' �w sK may, F �mp tty� N N uU g O m 19 m d CD IS Y � 3 o o ❑ �4 �g C is r R V r N om -x N -00 LI�Y'.r r r Ol r N tOO rall ew nMtO 1O O7 tr1...O M@tl.O OeF 011�O]O M. Of Of LL'f N.O CJ. O� ,- �.r r N •".M N N N. N Cr V' m 1p N M ® R. : t� IN � �% CCpp ppff 1l M n N.O OOH tf} ^NtO 54rnONEOO O.:N r� N� th N N N uA r Ci O' tv N c d � s d S U Ni $ W W ti. Us a MIT— tn � IS C g SNo'..wc�.�z�'.�a'�.' (n S¢t=�c�iz�'='.a We CITY HALL - Proposed diagonal parking Conversion of 1 way on south side, removed street to 2 -way on -street parking on north side, to improve k Proposed gateway and pedestrian and widened sidewalks i circulation 1 crossing at Gibson Creek ,. E; Proposed hhanced existing raised Proposed j s ` COUNTY tersection treatmt K bollards or ouRrHous t medians streetlights I i Proposed bulb outs Propo�e` .diagonal to reduce crossing pamin In front of D distance plaza Enhanced crosswalks t? t ALEXR:THOMAS .pl, Proposed ralse� THEATER t. pedestrian , ; '` _�- Conversio..of 1 -way to highlight ped st t PLAZA - . ' street to 2Y to median ; crossings im roveclrc+vlationz _ € 9 P , Enhanced intersection � � I , � , � , , x �� . ... � � 1 j treatment downtowngateway -- ' Proposed raised , , � } ; signal effici racy �dlan/ edestnan , ; �; • � :_- �-� � �' _ �` }.. ._a P low .._ Sid Ikswidened f easland Enhanced to l w for amenities r on Inte seal _- .: f gr � 5 � , treatment-tr- Existing as gateway G curb -cuts/ to City Hall -- - - ? sAEEwaY Proposed raised med* j driveways : < Enhanced crosswalks and removed on -street ; l t parking at downtown Existing gateway LEGEND bus << pull-out P Existing street tree GRACE HUDSON MUSEUM AND Dedicated bike lanes from J� Proposed street tree SDN HOUSE ClaySt to Norton St Proposed new sidewalk Proposed accent tree (retain existing granite curb Existing traffic signal to preserve character) I Proposed traffic signal , ' Continuous sidewalks to fill in existing gaps Enhanced sidewalk Pro 9SE'd i Enhanced gateway/ ® P intersection treatment s o �.. new Enhanced crosswalks ,EM Enhanced crosswalk intersection 4 w Proposed raised median ; treatment 7/l/2009 Background . • Datc • Stakeholder Interviews • Traffic Analysis • Opportunities and Constraints Analysis • Community Workshop #1 • Internal Review Committee Meetings • Community Workshop #2 Ukiah Downtown 5treetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing07-01-04 nrt aravplCO Opportunities and Constraints Analysis • Missing/incomplete crosswalks • Inconsistent streetscape amenities • Circulation inefficiencies — Signal timing and conflict with existing east -west one-way streets • Pedestrian and bicycle safety • Gateway and landmark opportunities • Potential for parking and landscape improvement at Alex R. Thomas Plaza • Opportunity to improve pedestrian orientation — Enhanced sidewalks — Decorative paving at crosswalks and key intersections r "� gg22 Ukiah Downtown 5treetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-04 rrtn greuilY� 7/1/2009 1 A vr� q W" V I 4W A V-7 % 4 J K 17, gl m-w A .X 'V W, t Suaaeesas Of Wft b.*d P S" -1 4- E, SIVEWAM IN —it U CaSTSSwht f I q ft, LEGEND A Traffic&irculation Analysis Issues Considered ® Traffic Flow ® Pedestrian facilities ® Parking ® Conflicting traffic movements ® Bicycle facilities ® Traffic signal phasing Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 urn giroup in 7/1/2009 4 Existing Conditions • Four travel lanes (two in each direction) — Varies in width between 10 feet —12 feet • No center turn lane • Shared through -turn lanes at intersections • Split phase or permitted phasing at all signalized intersections • Traffic signal inefficiencies at State/Perkins • Parallel parking on both sides of the street $p Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Nearing 07-01-09 MTM gr ;gni d r Traffic/Circulation Analysis Recommendations • Conversion from four lanes to three lanes (one through lane in each direction and a center two-way left -turn lane/median) • Steady vehicular traffic • Safer for pedestrians and bicyclists • Increases corridor efficiency • Center turn lane provides refuge for turning vehicles without blocking through vehicles • Improved traffic light timing with synchronized signals at State St./Standley St. and State St./Perkins St. • Increased efficiency at two intersections by eliminating existing split phase signal operations rimrC�p�� Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 j -inal Ukiah Downtown Streetscapc Improvement Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 -1 • 1 -Isms MIND M's - Sidewalks Main Street: provide consistent sidewalks while retaining existing granite curb in front of the Grace Hudson Museum ® State Street: introduce wider sidewalks to accommodate pedestrian amenities - Crosswalks - Enhanced crosswalk paving at all intersections Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 r i�nig nap Y 7/1/2009 V E • Traffic Signals • New signals at Main St/Gobbi St. and Main St./Perkins St. • Synchronized signals at State St/Standley St. and State St./Perkins St. • Side Streets (1 -Way to 2 -Way Conversions) • Henry St. west of State St. • Standley St. west and east of State St. • 60 degree diagonal parking on south side of Perkins St. between State St. and School St. with wider sidewalks Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 • Bulb -Outs and Mid -Block Extensions • Bulb -outs at most State St. intersections • Mid -block extensions where Seminary Ave., Stephenson St., and Henry St. meet State St. nrn • Intersection Treatments and Gateway Features • Intersection enhancement along State St. at Gobbi St., Seminary Ave., and Perkins St., and at Main St. and Gobbi St. • Gateway feature at Gibson Creek crossing on State St. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 rr- rrtn ..roup Hill 7/1/2009 5 11 • s • Raised Medians —to provide refuge for pedestrians and landscaped to beautify streetscape on State St between: • Gobbi St. and Mill St. • Stephenson St. and Church St. • Smith St. and Henry St. • Henry St. and the Gibson Creek gateway i {Sty In { Ukiah Downtown streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 I'M _.,,-,..... ® Bicycle Lanes • Main Street: Class II Bicycle Lanes (Clay Street and Norton Street) and Sharrows (South of Clay) • State Street: Class III Bicycle Route • Street Trees • New native, drought -tolerant trees to complement existing trees along State St. and Main St. • New trees at Alex R. Thomas Plaza • Accent trees at key intersections and gateways Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-04 Trctrpin 7/1/2009 R i O , 5'0ecra1k PXk"11 iraselteer" lmr,4 - tIw Prur3r11 Ad—alfl 40 ...... ...... ia54,vark-s Main Street -South of Clay (Facing South) art,.x. r .wzx. §W: stialR$ rung ;isrul in,rl l.z�i,. 4t.tdu7 La r. �u}��I 3 iV_t*raft Main Street - North of Clay (Facing North) r IN ME= Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 M , Recommended — Main St. I — t4,v Roof Ulan Sire=ci... South of Clay ira-19 SOUP,? '�vt 'hat�tl3t i aAkif47 ibi $.cbc{€, A2atn Street - Nortt; of =�Iay (Facirgp ;S�irai:i Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 7/1/2009 F Existing Conditions — State St. (South of Clay) ill 8, 10, j 10, i 10, 10, 8' ill Sidewalk ',Parking travel Lane I Travel Lane 1 Travel Lane Travel Lane Parking I Sidewalk 56 78' ROW State Street - South of Clay Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 r Far I group I R-MM97 M =s M91 (South of Clay) State Street - South of Clay Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 "n,group ll!" 7/1/2009 9 Existing Conditions — State St. (South of Perkins) A 12' a, Il. I ll' Sidewalk Parking Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Park2 Parking Sidewalk 6p' 84' ROW State Street - South of Perkins Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 nm wojp in Recommended — State St. (South of Perkins) State Street - South of Perkins Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 om pr,,Lp 7/1/2009 9 Existing Conditions — State St. (North of Perkins) 'I 41, R, el "i 12' Sidevialk Parking Traw,4 I an- Tt.vel Lane 'firovel Lan - Travel L—P Parking SWGwalk 60 BT ROW State Street - North of Perkins - --r & Ukiah Downtown 5treetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07.01-139 ffz���R (North of Perkins) State Street - North of Perkins Ukiah Downtown Stremscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 7/1/2009 im Existing Conditions — State St. (North of Smith) , Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 flu MM= grcup (North of Smith) State Street - North of Smith Ukiah Downtown Street—pe Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 1 up 7/1/2009 11 9' 8 12 1 14 1z 8' a' sicicNalk Pa'W'U3 Travel L.no Trane! Wm, Travel Lwte Travel Lame i Parking Sidenalk 61' 80' ROW State Street - North of Smith , Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 flu MM= grcup (North of Smith) State Street - North of Smith Ukiah Downtown Street—pe Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 1 up 7/1/2009 11 Existing Conditions — State St. (North of Henry) 8, 1 81 i 12' 12' 12' 12' 1 8' 1 10, t Sidewalk:, Parking Travel Lane I Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane i Parking Sidewalk j2' ROW __ State Street - North of Henry —-7Ukiah Downtown Streetecape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 (North of Henry) State Street - North of Henry Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 no, g'cu I P - 7/1/2009 12 Existing Conditions — Standley St. (West of State Street) West of State St. Ukiah Downtown Streatscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 rorn gra'All Recommended — Standley St. (West of State Street) West of State St. (one-way street converted to two-way) Ukiah Downtown Straatscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 rrra, 7/l/2009 13 Existing Conditions — Standley St. (East of State Street) 8' 16, Parking Travel Lane j,_-- 24' Curb to Curb East of State St. Ukiah Downtown Streetscame Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 in, arol"Ju Recommended — Standley St. (East of State Street) 12' 1 12' 1 jTravel Lane I Travel Lane J' 24' Curb to Curb N East of State St (one-way street converted to two-way with no parking) Ukiah Downtown Streatscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 nm g C up 7/1/2009 14 Existing Conditions — Henry St. (West of State Street) 8, 16 Parking I Travel Lane 24' Curb to Curb West of State St. Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan -CC Hearing 07-01-09 r- grc I upeEG I Recommended — Henry St. (West of State Street) 12'12' Travel Lane 1 Travel Lane 1 21 Curb to Curb West of State St. (one-way street converted to two-way with no parking) Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC I -fearing 07-01-09 7/1/2009 ip Ukiah Downtown Streetscape Improvement Plan- CC Hearing 07-01-09 = "In -1-1 - tim I up 7/l/2009 W. ITEM NO.: 10b MEETING DATE: 7/1/2009 Cit -11 al- Ukiah AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT ON LOCAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION REGARDING DROUGHT AND WATER SHORTAGE STATUS Summary: In drought conditions, the City may declare a local emergency under the California Emergency Services Act ("ESA"). In addition, the City Council under the Ukiah City Code may declare a Water Shortage Emergency as a Stage I, II or III emergency. At its meeting of April 15, 2009, the City Council adopted a RESOLUTION DECLARING A LOCAL EMERGENCY UNDER THE STATE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACT AND A STAGE I WATER SHORTAGE EMERGENCY UNDER SECTION 3602 THE UKIAH CITY CODE. (Attachment #1) The resolution contains recitals setting forth the drought conditions and the response to those conditions by the State, Mendocino County, the Sonoma County Water Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board which the resolution seeks to address. Please refer to those recitals for details. Subsequent to adoption of the resolution, City staff has responded further to the water shortage emergency by replying to the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) regarding actions that the City of Ukiah has taken, and will be taking, to address water conservation. Attachment #2 is a'copy of that letter. The letter outlined actions that the City is taking, responded to SCWA's request for water use information, and included an outline of the City of Ukiah's water conservation program for 2009. As a result of the drought, the City Council has considered many different aspects of the water shortage issue. Under Council's direction, staff has implemented a series of water conservation and education measures. In addition, the City has a full time staff position dedicated to implementing these measures. On June 17, 2009, the City Council adopted the mandatory water conservation measures. 1. Use through any meter when the City has notified the customer in writing to repair a broken or defective plumbing, sprinkler, watering or irrigation system and the customer has failed to effect such repairs within five days; 2. Use of water which results in flooding or runoff in gutters or; 3. Use of water through a hose for washing cars, buses, boats, trailers or other vehicles in the public right of way or any other location that creates runoff in gutter or streets; Continued on page 2 Recommended Action: City Council receive the status report on water shortage emergency, and provide further direction on water shortage activities as needed. Alternative Council Option(s): N/A Citizens advised: N/A Requested by: Jane Chambers, City Manager Prepared by: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works and City Engineer Coordinated with: Ann Burck, Deputy Director of Public Works, Water and Sewer Division Attachments: Attachment 1 — Resolution Attachment 2 — Letter to SCWA Approved: Chambers, City Manager 4. Use of water through a hose for washing buildings, structures, sidewalks, walkways, driveways, patios, parking lots, tennis courts, or other hard -surfaced areas that creates runoff in gutter or streets; 5. Service of water by any restaurant except upon the request of a patron; 6. Use of water to flush hydrants, except where required for public health or safety; New Developments from the SWRCB On May 28, 2009, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) issued an amendment to Order WR 2009-0027-DWR, Order WR 2009 -0034 -EXEC. The amended order conditionally approves Sonoma County Water Agency's (SCWA) petition to reduce the flow in the Russian River from July 6 through October 2, 2009 to 25 cubic feet per second (cfs) for the upper Russian River and 35 cfs for the lower Russian River if during the period from April 1 through June 30 total inflow to Lake Mendocino is less than or equal to 25,000 acre- feet. The amended order modified the original order issued on April 6, 2009. From July 6 (instead of July 1) through October 2, 2009, minimum instream flow shall remain at or above 25 cfs, if Lake Mendocino storage is less than 65,630 acre feet on July 1, 2009 (instead of total inflow to Lake Mendocino less than or equal to 25,000 acre-feet). As of June 24, 2009, Lake Mendocino storage was 57,088 acre-feet. Assuming no further reduction in lake storage, 8,542 acre-feet would have to be added to the lake in 11 days for the existing flow of 75 cfs not to be reduced to 25 cfs. The amended order confirms a water conservation goal for Mendocino County of 50% (compared to 2004) from April 6, 2009 until the expiration of this order (October 2, 2009), "By May 6, 2009, SCWA shall submit a plan to the State Water Resources Control Board to obtain the cooperation and participation of agricultural and municipal Russian River water user to reach a water conservation goal of 25 percent in Sonoma County and 50 percent ;in Mendocino County for the period of April 6, 2009 until the expiration of this order (October 2, 2009) . Staff has included this item on unfinished business so that the most current data on our water supply situation can be presented. Staff will also present the most current information regarding State and County actions. RESOLUTION OF E CITY COUNCIL OF OF UKIAH DECLARING LOCALi PURSUANT TO THE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACT AND A STAGE I WATER EMERGENCY i . SECTION 3602 OF i CODE 1. Lake Mendocino and the Russian River are one current source of water for the City of Ukiah and the primary source of water for other domestic and agricultural users of water in Mendocino and Sonoma Counties; and 2. Average rainfall through March for the area contributing run-off to Lake Mendocino is 42 inches and the rainfall total through March 2009 is 23 inches; and 3. There have been below average rainfall and reduced storage in Lake Mendocino in 2004, 2007 and 2008; and 4. Average rainfall for April — June is 4.8 inches; and 5. Even average rainfall for the remainder of the rainy season cannot compensate for the extremely low rainfall this year•, and 6. Lake Mendocino held approximately 53,000 acre feet on April 1, 2009, with a Lake level of 727.63 feet; and 7. The average Lake storage in April is 84,448 acre feet, the Lake storage in April 2007 was 66,617 acre feet and the average Lake storage in October is 55,854 acre feet, more water at the end of the dry summer season than is currently stored in the Lake; and 8. The historically low water storage level in Lake Mendocino this year is part of a statewide water shortage caused by inadequate rainfall which has prompted Governor Schwarzenegger to declare a statewide emergency under the Emergency Services Act due to these drought conditions; and 9. Mendocino County has declared a local emergency due to drought conditions under the Emergency Services Act; and 10. On April 6, 2009, the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB") has approved an Urgency Change Petition filed by the Sonoma County Water Agency ("SCWA") to reduce in -stream flows in the Russian River to 75 cfs from April 6 -June 30, 2009 and to as low as 25 cfs for the period July 1 -October 2, 2009, if cumulative total inflow to Lake Mendocino is equal to or less than 25,000 acre feet for the period April 1 -June 30, 2009; and 11. The order approving temporary changes to the minimum in -stream flows required by the appropriative rights permits issued to SCWA is subject to several conditions, including a condition requiring the SCWA to submit a plan by May 6, 2009, to the SWRCB to 'obtain the cooperation and participation of agricultural and municipal Russian River water users to reach a water conservation goal of 25 percent in Sonoma County and 50 percent in Mendocino County for the period of April 6, 2009 until the expiration of this order (October 2, 2009)"; and 12. A local emergency under the California Emergency Services Act (Government Code §8550 et seq.) is defined in Section 8558(c) as the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of the City caused by such conditions as drought which are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of individual local governments and which require the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat; and 13. The historically low rainfall and water storage in Lake Mendocino qualifies as a local emergency under the statutory definition; and 14. In a declared local emergency, local agencies may provide'mutual aid as needed pursuant to agreements or resolutions, state agencies may provide mutual aid to local agencies pursuant to agreement or at the direction of the Governor, costs incurred by the City in providing mutual aid pursuant to agreements or resolution constitute a charge against the state, when approved by the Governor in accordance with adopted regulations, and the City Council may promulgate orders and regulations for the duration of the emergency to provide protection for life and properly (see Government Code §§ 8631-86-34); and 15. In a declared local emergency, the City Council must review the state of the emergency not less than every 21 days after first declaring the emergency; and 16. Under Ukiah City Code Section 3602, the City Council may by resolution declare a water emergency, specify the degree of emergency and place into effect the appropriate provisions of Division 4, Chapter 1, Article 11 of the Ukiah City Code pertaining to a Water Shortage Emergency; and 17. In a Stage I water emergency the Mayor shall issue a proclamation urging citizens to institute such water conservation measures on a voluntary basis as may be required to reduce water demand to coincide with available supply; and 18. The City Council has already authorized the development of a groundwater well on an emergency basis to provide the City with an additional water source this summer that does not rely on the Russian River or water stored in Lake Mendocino; and 19. Stage II and III water emergencies impose various mandatory conservation measures on City residents, including a prohibition on "nonessential water use" in a Stage II water emergency and a limit on the daily use of water by different classes of water user in a Stage III emergency; and 2 20. The City can declare a Stage II or Stage II emergency, if voluntary measures or less sever mandatory measures does not achieve an adequate reduction in the use of Russian River water or in water use generally to meet the available supply; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Ukiah hereby: 1. Declares a local emergency due to draught under the Emergency Service Act. 2. Declares a Stage I Water Storage Emergency under Ukiah City Code Section 3602. 3. Directs the City Manager: a. to identify and encourage the use as a Russian River water user of voluntary measures to reach a water conservation goal of 50 percent for the period of April 6, 2009 to October 2, 2009 ("Conservation Period"), and to report back to the City Council at each City Council meeting field during that same time period on the measures identified, the means used to encourage their use, the amount of water use reduction, and the status of the emergency conditions; b. to notify the City Council, if the City Manager determines that a Stage I Water Emergency is not reducing water use to match the available supply and to recommend a Stage II or III emergency, if necessary to achieve that level of water use; c. at City Council meetings during the Conservation Period to recommend temporary rules or orders to supplement or modify mandatory conservation measures in a Stage II or III Water Storage Emergency to reduce water use to the available supply and to achieve the conservation goals in Order WR 2009-0027-DWR issued by the Division of Water Rights of the State Water Resources Control Board; c. to work with other local governments in the County, including the incorporated cities and county water districts, to preserve as much water as possible for use during the dry summer months and for the fall return of Chinook Salmon to the Russian River; and d. to coordinate mutual aid efforts to address the local emergency between and among political subdivisions in Mendocino and Sonoma Counties and state agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED on April 15, 2009, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Landis, Thomas, Crane, Rodin, and Mayor Baldwin NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Philip E. aldwin, Mayor ATTEST. Lida ro ity Clerk 3 M April 28, 2009 Lynn Florey Sonoma County Water Agency Principal Program Specialist P.O. Box 11628 Santa Rosa, CA 95406 Dear Ms. Florey; W-1 This letter is written in response to your letter dated April 17, 2009. I do not know when your letter was received by the City of Ukiah, but it arrived at our water treatment plant rather than in my office at City Hall. The letter was just brought to my attention late yesterday. I had been expecting a request to respond to Sonoma County Water Agency for information related to the State Water Resources Control Board's ruling, and, therefore, am making an effort to meet your deadline of today's date. In future, it would be helpful if you could copy and/or address critical dated correspondence about these current drought conditions directly to my office, as that will assist us in making timely replies. Attached, please find the diversion volumes information requested in your letter. You will see that overall annual water use since 2004 has been reduced by 11.4%. Water use in the months of April through October has been reduced since -2004 by 13%. Diversion volume during the months April through October has also been reduced, for some 25% between 2004 and 2007, and 16% between 2004 and 2008 use. Reduced use over the last few years is a result of the City's commitment to institute conservation measures in both the irrigation and domestic use of water in our community. Attached please find the City of Ukiah's Water Conservation Program which outlines current activities the City is taking to address water conservation. With regard to immediate drought related conditions, here are some technical and rate related factors that the City of Ukiah must deal with as the summer and high irrigation use time approaches: The City's water supply is obtained from a Ranney collector well and Wells #3 and #4. The Ramsey and Well #3 draw water from an alluvial zone along the Russian River. The pumping capacity of both the Ranney collector and Well #3 are affected by the amount of flow in the river. If that water is not available during this summer, the only source of water available as of this date will be Well #4, which is percolated groundwater. On February 27, 2009 Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a water shortage. On February 26, 2009, the City received a letter from Victoria A. 300 SEMINARY AVENUE UKIAH, CA 95482-5400 Phone# 707/463-6200 Fax# 707/463-6204 Web Address: www.cityofukiah.com City staff is actively seeking stimulus funding for a system to deliver recycled water from the City's wastewater treatment plant. At the current time, it is anticipated that the wastewater treatment plant could begin to produce recycled water by August of 2009. A distribution system is under design and plans will be developed within the next few months. Funding for this important resource delivery project will be explored from all possible resources, as the City fully recognizes the value of using recycled water to lower the demand for surface water in our area. Although a recycled water distribution system cannot be in place for this suminer, the City will pursue developing this resource. With regard to efforts to identify and prevent water waste and unreasonable use: Typical water waster penalties include, in the order implemented: 1. Educational letter or visit 2. Educational visit and warning 3. Citation 4. Installation of flow restrictor and possible fine 5. Shutoff and reconnection fee The City will identify water wasters through monitoring the water meters and citizen reports. In closing, please review all aspects of the attached conservation measures and water use detail in addressing the four questions of your letter, in addition to the specific issues addressed in the above bullet points. Please call me at 707- 463- 6213 if you have questions regarding this information. Sincerely, :w ane A. Chambers City Manager Attachments: 1. City of Ukiah Water Use 2. City of Ukiah Water Conservation Program 2009 Annual Water Use MG 2008 1192.968 2007 1219.964 2006 1248.424 2005 1223.542 2004 1345.744 April May June July August Sept. Oct. Total MG ac -ft April May June July August Sept. Oct. Total MG ac -ft City of Ukiah Water Use -11.4% 2008/2004 -9.3% 2007/2004 -7.2% 2006/2004 -9.1% 2005/2004 1036.266 Water Use (MG) 901.866 -13% -13% 2004 2007 2008 2009 2007/2004 2008/2004 96.743 87.507 87.865 -10% -9% 145.402 121.506 132.345 -16% -9% 162.897 149.782 143.469 -8% -12% 185.876 164.473 158.899 -12% -15% 179.326 162.859 157.056 -9% -12% 156.798 134.481 130.508 -14% -17% 109.224 83.777 91.724 -23% -16% 1036.266 904.385 901.866 -13% -13% 3180 2775 2768 2008/2004 Diversion Volume (MG) 2004 2007 2008 2009 2007/2004 2008/2004 57.046 27.598 62.754 -52% 10% 112.803 72.833 111.365 -35% -1% 129.493 109.976 102.115 -15% -21% 131.935 105.631 109.09 -20% -17% 126.768 104.658 101.593 -17% -20% 117.755 88.134 85.313 -25% -28% 96.734 72.864 73.465 -25% -24% 772.534 581.694 64S.695 -25% -16% 2371 1785 1982 The City of Ukiah Water Conservation Program 2009 The unpredictability of its water supplies and ever increasing demand on California's complex water resources have resulted in a coordinated effort by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), water utilities, environmental organizations, and other interested groups to develop a list of urban water conservation demand management measures (DMM) for conserving water. This consensus building effort resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California, as amended September 16, 1999, among parties, which formalizes an agreement to implement these DMMs and makes a cooperative effort to reduce the consumption of California's water resources. The MOU is administered by the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC). The DMMs as defined in the MOU are generally recognized as standard definitions of water conservation measures. CUWCC Demand Management Measures Implemented The existing conservation The City of Ukiah has had a water conservation program in place since the late 1970's. During the past five years, the City has expanded its program and public outreach. The City reduced the amount of water it used by over 9.3% in 2007 and 11.4% in 2008 compared to 2004. Currently, the City's conservation program includes the following DMMs: DMM 1. Water survey programs for single-family residential and multi -family residential connections. The City tests customer meters upon request and instructs customers in how to use their water meter to determine if there is a leak on the demand side of the meter. The City provides toilet leak detection tablets to customers. DMM 3. System water audits, leak detection, and repair. The City performs leak detection and repair on an ongoing basis. The City, also, calculates system water losses annually and reports this information to DWR. DMM 4. Metering with commodity rates for all new connections and retrofit of existing connections. The City water distribution system is fully metered. The City is currently replacing old meters in the system. The new meters will provide a more accurate reading of water use within the City. The City recently went through a rate re -structuring that is believed will reduce water uses in the future. DMM 5. Large landscape conservation programs and incentives. The City's Planning Department reviews all landscape plans proposed for new developments. Included in the City's Municipal Code is a requirement for all landscape planting to be "those which grow well in Ukiah's climate without extensive irrigation." City staff reviews the water use of its top 5 water users and holds meetings with them on a regular basis to discuss landscape conservation programs. DMM 7. Public information programs. The City believes public awareness of water conservation issues is an important factor in ensuring a reliable water supply. The City promotes public awareness of water conservation through occasional bill stuffers, distribution of the Consumer Confidence Report, radio broadcasts, newspaper articles, the City of Ukiah's "Activity and Recreation Guide", distribution of brochures and additional information at local expositions and fairs, and on the City website advertised to the community on a banner across a City thoroughfare. The City also provides free of charge water conservation yard signs to encourage minimal use of water for lawn irrigation. Water conservation information and assistance is routinely provided to the public by the water utility maintenance staff and meter readers while in the field. Field staff receives conservation training to better assist customers and promote conservation. Door hangers are used to remind customers of Ukiah's Voluntary Water Conservation Program measures and to provide notice of problems with outdoor water use. DMM 8. School education programs. City staff presents information on water conservation to elementary school children in the classroom. The City offers local schools tours of its water treatment plant and also provides educational materials. Four science classes on public water supply at the high school are offered once a year. DMM 9. Conservation programs for commercial, industrial, and institutional accounts. The City has only two industrial customers: Maverick Industries and Red Tail Ale Brewery. The City surveys the water usage of these industries. Any new commercial, industrial, or institutional developments will be reviewed by the City Planning Department and must meet all requirements of the Municipal Code. DMM 11. Conservation pricing. In 2005, the City increased and re -structured its water rates to encourage more conservation. The City has simplified its rate structure by eliminating rate codes and classifying customers according to their meter size. The new rate structure incorporates the American Water Works Association (AWWA) demand capacity guidelines so that price increases across meter size in proportion to the potential demand a customer can place on the water system. DMM 12. Conservation Coordinator. The City's Conservation Coordinator is essential to sustaining and improving Ukiah's ongoing water conservation program. The conservation coordinator is responsible for implementing and monitoring the City's water conservation activities. In practice, the City's water conservation program includes the efforts of the Conservation Coordinator and all staff. DMM 13. Water waste prohibition. The City has adopted regulations that state in part: "Where negligent or wasteful use of water exists on a customer's premises...the City may discontinue the service..." (City Municipal Code Article 7, Section 3571). The City first sends customers a letter calling their attention to the wasteful practice and asking for correction. If the condition is not corrected within five days after the written notice, service may be discontinued if necessary. DMM 14. Residential ULFT replacement programs. Since October 1992, the sale of toilets using more than 1.6 gallons per flush has been prohibited by State and Federal regulations. These regulations are enforced in the City. If. Additional Water Conservation Measures In addition to the DMMs, the City has also taken the following actions: 1. Installation of five waterless urinals in the Ukiah Civic Center to support and promote the use of waterless urinals in all City facilities and in the public sector. The use of these urinals has received very positive feedback from Facilities staff who would like to install these in the Ukiah Valley Conference Center. 2. Cooperative water conservation programs have been developed between the City and the Mendocino County Water Agency, the Russian River Public Water Agencies, and the Sonoma County Water Agency. 3. The Ukiah City Council adopted the Ahwahnee Water Principles on April 4, 2007. The Principles contain ideas for protecting and enhancing water quality, improving water availability, making more efficient use of water, and conserving water as a scarce resource. The Principles suggest a process for improving decision-making as it impacts water -related issues. The City Council. reviewed the Principles and determined the ideas and suggestions promote the Council's stated goals. III. Future Water Conservation Activities The City has recently undertaken a rate and revenue study of its water utility. A tiered inclining block rate structure and excess use charge are being evaluated to -encourage water conservation. The City has submitted a pre -application to the State Water Resources Control Board State Revolving Fund to construct a recycled water system. The City's Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project is scheduled to be completed by June 2009. After the project is completed, the plant will be capable of producing 2 million gallons per day (MGD) in the summer and up to 7.5 MGD in the winter of Title 22 unrestricted use recycled water. Other immediate and long-term conservation measures include: ® Installation of waterless urinals and dual flush toilets in all City buildings (immediate) ® Sign the California Urban Water Conservation Council's Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation and implement the 14 best management practices (long term) ® Water efficiency standards for new single-family development (long term) ® Water -efficient landscaping (long term) • Water waste ordinance prohibiting: (immediate) 1. gutter flooding 2. carwash fundraisers 3. non -recycling decorative water fountains 4. breaks or leaks in the water delivery system ® Incentives for Retrofits (long term) 1, low flow shower heads 2. toilet displacement devices B. toilet flappers 4. faucet aerators S. high efficiency washing machines 6. ultra-low flow toilets 3. The recommended goal for each water emergency stage is: a. Stage 1— Current voluntary conservation program is sufficient to reduce demand to supply level b. Stage 2 —Need mandatory conservation level of 50% to reduce demand to supply level and ensure reservoirs are full. c. Stage 3— Demand must be restricted to 50 gallons per person per residence, commercial and industrial use reduced to 50% of prior water use, all irrigation prohibited to reduce demand to supply level. 2006 If water was not available from Gobbi St. Well and Oak Manor Well there are some �(~ conditions where the supply will not be sufficient to provide the water supply of a Stage III Emergency. Under those conditions, water demand will have to be reduced to less than that of a Stage III Emergency. Stage III Emergency June July August (gallon (gallon (gallon Residential Total Needed 576,000 576,000 576,000 Commercial Total 147 [, 3 l � 2,324,E l0 w nnr_ Z,O3q,O+15 q Needed 940,226= '�5 Total Needed �� a r31 ^rsrvzzv- ���o �A� , Examples of Water Allotment Under Stage III: 1. Residential Allotment for a 2 -person household 9Vy use - W0 1rric, 50 gallons per day x 2 persons =100 gallons per day x 31 days (July or Aug.) = 3,100 gallons per month or units (1 unit equals gallons). 4.111 %4-$ 2. All Other Uses (Industrial, Commercial, Fire Services, Commercial Hydrant Meters Limited to 50% of the prior (2008) water use for a similar period as determined by the Department from its records. For July, thea otment for Commercial Customers 4.6 Z, 324, -ft o = 50% x 2-951& million gallons = gallons per month / 659 commercial accts. _ 3527 4,454 gallons per month per commercial customer ori units`(1 unit equals gallons). 4.-7(5- Page .-7(u Page 4 of 5 'M City of Ukiah Water System Operations Plan for Summer of 2009 I. Goals 1. Ensure water supply equals water demand. 2. Keep water reservoirs full for fire protection (6 million gallons). 3. Implement and maintain water conservation program in compliah with order from State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 11. What Is Known 1. Per SWRCB Order WR 2009 -0034 -EXEC, if Lake Mendocino Storage is less than 65,630 acre feet on July 1, 2009, then from July 6 through October 2, 2009, minimum instream flow for the upper Russian River shall remain at or above 25 cubic feet per second (cfs). 2. As of June 30, 2009, Lake Mendocino storage was 55,696 acre feet, 9,934 acre feet less than the minimum of 65,630 needed for a minimum instrearn flow of 75 cfs. 3. Per SWRCB Order WR 2009 -0034 -EXEC, by May 6, 2009, SCWA shall submit a plan to the SWCB to obtain the cooperation and participation of agricultural and municipal Russian River water users to reach a water conservation goal of 25 percent in Sonoma County and 50 percent in Mendocino County for the period of April 6, 2009 until the expiration of this order (October 2, 2009). 4. The productivity of the Ranney collector well has been declining since mid-April 2009. Productivity is calculated as the [pumping rate/(water level w/ pump on — water level W/ pump off)]. 5. California is in the third year of a three year drought, which is expected to continue into 2010. There has been no rain measured at the Coyote Station since May 6, 2009. 6. The State of California, the County of Mendocino, and the City of Ukiah have declared a "State of Emergency" due to water shortage as a result of the drought. 7. The City currently has 3 operating wells. The Ranney collector well next to the Russian River, Well #3 one-third of a mile from the river, and Well #4 a mile from the river. In previous years, the amount of water in the Ranney collector and Well #3 varied with the amount of water in the Russian River. Page 1 of 5 III. What Is Not Known 1. The effect on the productivity of Ranney collector well and Well #3 from a reduction in the upper Russian River instream flow from 75 cfs to 25 cfs. 2. The remaining life of the deteriorated casing in Well #4. 3. Long term pumping capacity the Gobbi Street Well. The constant rate test was conducted at 1,000 gpm (1.440 MGD) and is the expected initial pumping capacity. 4. The pumping capacity of the Oak Manor Drive Well. The a -log showed cobbles and gravel down to 200 feet and from 200 feet down 310, the grain size decreased. IV. Water Supplv and Demand Projections Based on AvailahiP Infnrmatinn and tho Chen 1. An analysis was made to determine the effect of the 67% reduction in flow in the Russian River, the 50% water conservation goal set by the SWRCB for Mendocino County, the addition of the Gobbi Street Well and the Oak Manor well on the City's projected water supply and demand for July, August, and September 2009. The following table shows the projected demand based on the demand for May and June 2009 and a 50% water conservation goal: Monthly demand 2009 (MGD) .2004 (MGD) May (64% of 2004) 2.987 May 4.700 June (63% of 2004) 3.395 June 5.430 July (70% of 2004) 4.197. July, 5.996 July (50% of 2004) 2.998 5.996 August (70% of 2004) 4.049 August 5.785 August (50% of 2004) 2.892 5.785 Sept. (70% of 2004) 3.659 Sept 5.227 Sept. (50% of 2004) 2.613 5,227 2. The results of the analysis are shown on the spreadsheet, "Water Supply versus Water Demand from July 6 through September 2009". The results were used to provide guidance under what conditions a Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III water emergency should be declared. Page 2 of 5 O O OC ® O_ O Ln W 3 to et r; m cr) Ln MO - _bN Z ei Cr M to tC .... O O e 4 e4 e-1 d' i19 awl M N � OLoO a � Nn p O O O p t7 a -i m tN m t'a'i 3 N to O -r O cr to M Ln to in %-q m Ln m e-1 m m m .4 a .-+ cr cr r m M to UD M s- r4 f- C c4 e4 a4 ui d' f -I M N cn N � v � Ln O O O 0 'a p Oto O O Co O '�i 3 NQ 0 �r O er e-1 rw M ct N 6'). pbogb 40 ®_ ® gt O 0 . N "O e-1 cr cr M co v O 00 f6 r 2 C a O d a4 a -i e -i Cr ri ea9 d N N O o\ CJ L OA V4 O E y 3 g r G7 to O o o QJ 41 (7 M 'aM m LNn O Oc�r 3 cn LNn � � cn Co M M mr a e-1 tti M 4� O M j �I j v O Ln --=4-0 Lo O 0 L C O O i+ m m O N 3 -l3 C C '30 ami A r4 PS eel '6 � ei d' OSS N � In � �° o O O M 3 3 O to � 0 ei N V N O to 6d9 t\ CO Qy ® a 3 o 'o C7 m dM 3a ` m vq m op @ a 3 � � � ... r• -I � O � e-1 r1 d' P! et' N y'�j 41 >. Ln G 0 3 3 O c 87 � N O p t7 tD C O N U tNn O O O r� 00 N m dM a -i N C a-1 r4 Ln m C1' fV L CL S. O.. 0 Ln M O Ln N GJ > u a o N m E c=a Ecu 1 41 N :o [a In �. o O 'O 'a v p (tun p \ ^ to O 3 3 m W Sl O Ln co 3 v y N c G d 00 p rqrq .-i rq Vi f� m pp w m to d d N M Q1 O at coV 41o O to o O E C3 4i C a Ln _ m L" j O 0 O w Q (07 3. The recommended goal for each water emergency stage is: a. Stage 1— Current voluntary conservation program is sufficient to reduce demand to supply level b. Stage 2 —Need mandatory conservation level of 50% to reduce demand to supply level and ensure reservoirs are full. c. Stage 3 —Demand must be restricted to 50 gallons per person per residence, commercial and industrial use reduced to 50% of prior water use, all irrigation prohibited to reduce demand to supply level. If water was not available from Gobbi St. Well and Oak Manor Well, there are some conditions where the'supply will not be sufficient to provide the water supply of a Stage III Emergency. Under those conditions, water demand will have to be reduced to less than that of a Stage III Emergency. Stage III Emergency June July August (gallons) (gallons) (gallons) Residential Total Needed 576,000 576,000 576,000 Commercial Total Needed 940,226 1,485,385 1,303,208 Total Needed 1,516,226 2,0611385 1,879,028 Examples of Water Allotment Under Stage III: 1. Residential Allotment for a 2 -person household = 50 gallons per day x 2 persons =100 gallons per day x 31 days (July or Aug.) = 3,100 gallons per month or 6.485 units (1 unit equals 478 gallons). All Other Uses (Industrial, Commercial, Fire Services, Commercial Hydrant Meters Limited to 501 of the prior (2008) water use for a similar period as determined by the Department from its records. For July, the allotment for Commercial Customers = 50% x 2.970 million gallons =1,485,385 gallons per month / 659 commercial accts. _ 2,254 gallons per month per commercial customer or 4.715 units (1 unit equals 478 gallons). Page 4 of 5 4. Staff recommendations of when to declare each water emergency stage: a. In July —without Gobbi Welland reduced capacity from Ranney and Well #3, the Council will need to declare either a Stage II or Stage III Emergency b. In August - without Gobbi Well and/or Oak Manor Well and reduced capacity from Ranney and Well #3, the Council will need to declare either a Stage II or Stage III Emergency c. In September - without Gobbi Well and/or Oak Manor Well and reduced capacity from Ranney and Well #3, the Council will need to declare either a Stage II or Stage III Emergency Page 5 of 5 Fi cn cc � tD L rn N T -q »:Il< «t*«»>_< AN INTRODUCTION TO WELL DRAWDOWN SEVERAL ]KEY TERMS ASSOCIATED WITH WELL DRAWDOWN are listed below. Static level Static level is the level of water in a well when no water is being taken from the well by pumps It is usually expressed as the distance in feet or meters from the ground surface to the water level. Pumping level Pumping level is the level of water in the well during pumping. This, too, is usually expressed as the distance in feet or meters from the ground surface to the water level. Drawdown is the drop in level of water in a well when water is being pumped. Drawdown measurements record the difference (in feet or meters) between the static level and the pumping level. Well yield Well yield is the volume of water per unit of time that is produced from the well by pumping. Usually, well yield is measured in terms of gallons per minute (gpm) or gallons per hour (gph). Sometimes, large flows are measured in cubic feet per second (cfs) Specific capacity Specific capacity is expressed as the well yield per unit of drawdown. For example, if the well yield is 100 gpm and the drawdown is 10 ft, the specific capacity of the well is 10 gpm per feet of drawdown. Rural and Small Systems Training Guide ■■ ¥»• ;■ ©? ,■ ©»� > >■ : »d . . d \ ® � �Z \� »: «� � �\ . ®•. a, !■ �: 2: �� a- :. :. : 4 ;■ . � . .....� � . - : a , .■ \% \ - - � ■,� ,■� .■■; .■■• v aa) C N O a) N 0 ro } o L z 'D E � cu o � U V *� A � vs aLL Lb 3:U0.z M ; City of Ukiah U 300 Seminary Ave Ukiah, CA 95482 PWSIU 2310003 ®ISS" ISD ------------------------------------- a w c C� G R T ti N N 0 0 rn d e 0' w U tci � c D � w d E c M N W' a v co Lo N h 04 Lo N to to P N N p r C p = 00 •.fes v E— o c •� 'C o E z M- a M -j U � E CD E a� FO c fA p U c J 0 4 M Y C 8 E Y m p� O_ d� O •V .� Y ® ai r o,•v p E stirM co ami co co _a o E as E N o oQ�o titi ca p,� *� A � vs aLL Lb 3:U0.z M ; City of Ukiah U 300 Seminary Ave Ukiah, CA 95482 PWSIU 2310003 ®ISS" ISD ------------------------------------- a w c C� G R T ti N N 0 0 rn d e 0' w U 3602: DECLARATION OF WATER EMERGENCY: When it appears that the City maybe unable to supply the normal demands and requirements of water customers, the City Council may, by resolution declare a water emergency. The resolution shall specify the degree of emergency existing and shall place into effect the appropriate provisions of this ordinance. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3603: REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY RESTRICTIONS OF WATER USE STAGE 4 Whenever the City Council, by resolution, declares Stage I water emergency to exist, the Mayor shall issue a proclamation urging citizens to institute such water 'conservation measures on a voluntary basis as may be required to reduce water demand to coincide with available supply. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) It is unlawful for any person to use water for any nonessential use as hereinafter defined, whenever the City Council determines by resolution that a Stage 11 water emergency exists. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) 3605: NONESSENTIAL USES DEF F. Use of water to wash any sidewalk, walkways, driveway, street, parking lot, tennis court, or other hard surfaced area by hosing or by otherwise direct use of water from faucets or other outlets. G. Use of water to wash any motor vehicle, trailer, airplane, or boat by hosing or otherwise using water directly from a faucet or other outlet. H. Use of water to fill or refill any swimming pool. I. Use of water to add to any swimming pool not equipped with and using a pool cover. (Ord. 691, §4 _adopted 1977) 3606: FURTHER NONESSENTIAL USES DEFINED STAGE III: In addition to the nonessential uses set forth in §3605, the following additional uses are determined to be nonessential when the Council has, by resolution declared a State III emergency. A. Use of water in excess of the daily usage allotment hereinafter set forth: Single family or duplex (100 cu. ft. per 50 gallons - per permanent month) resident' Multi -residential units (180 cu. ft. per 45 gallons - per permanent month) resident B. All other uses not expressly set forth in §3605 shall be limited to fifty percent (50%) of the prior water use for a similar period as determined by the Department from its records. Where no such records exist, prior water use shall be deemed to be the average prior water use of similar existing services as shall be determined by the Department from its records. C. Use of water to irrigate, the provisions of §3605 above to the contrary, notwithstanding. D. Use of water for hand -watering. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) Each customer in whose name water is supplied to a residence shall upon request of the Director advise him under penalty of perjury the number of permanent residents using water supplied to that residence. If such a residential customer shall fail to so advise the Director, such residence shall be permitted the water allocation herein provided for one permanent resident. (Ord. 691, §1, adopted 1977) E-3 Jim ITEM NO.: rym MEETING 1. DA City aJ-'Ukz:afi AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT I(�F1 July 1, 2009 SUBJECT: ADOPT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS NO. 09-08 FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE UKIAH AIRPORT STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AND APPROVE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Summary: Per section 22039 of the Public Contracts Code, staff is requesting Council's approval of plans and specifications number 09-08 for the phase 1 reconstruction of the Ukiah Airport storm drain system. The architect's estimate for this project is $657,000. Background: Project funding has been approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The proposed project will begin phase1 of the storm drain reconstruction. The bid opening is scheduled for July 31 2009. Project construction is scheduled to be completed by 60 days after notice to proceed. The plans and specifications for the reconstruction of the Ukiah Airport storm drain phase 1 are available for City Council and public review at the Ukiah Civic Center Engineering Department, 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, California. Fiscal Impact: ®Budgeted FY 09/10 1-1F-1Appropriation Not Applicable Budget Amendment Required Recommended Action(s): 1. Adopt plans and specifications for Ukiah Airport storm drain phase 1 Spec. No. 09-08 2. Approve advertisement for bids. Alternative Council Option(s): N/A Citizens advised: n/a Requested by: Greg Owen, Airport Manager Prepared by: Greg Owen, Airport Manager Coordinated with: Jane Chambers, City Manager Attachments: 1 – Cover sheet – specification page 2 – Cover sheet - clans Approved: JChambers, City Manager MAWR IDIOM = to ra IFR on 0 9 1 1 a 1 14 0 � W.11113 UR rslkkl STORM DRAIN AIP No. 0: "0 6: CITY OF UKIAH ENGINEERING DIVISION 300 Seminary Avenue Ukiah, California 95482 CITY COUNCIL: PHIL BALDWIN - MAYOR BENJ THOMAS - VICE MAYOR DOUGLAS F. CRANE MARY ANNE LANDIS MARI RODIN JANE CHAMBERS - CITY MANAGER TIM ERICKSEN - DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER RICHARD J. SEANOR - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LINDA BROWN - CITY CLERK R. ALLEN CARTER - CITY TREASURER CITY OF UKIAH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS I Z r—i a '- pw W O �a zw o X 0 o I N) O O O � 0 .o as C1 > 0 Z 0 a z° l rr� I�1 v �- W J K m 2 Q Q W Y K I a9yHd-.I351fOHd MollyJI'IIHyH3H MlvHQ WHOIS SHOdHIv ZvMolf)9H HvTvn Attachment # —Z CO Z MING0 a '- pw O �a zw o X 0 o= N) O as C1 a z° uUa V Z _Q LL. O U N z 0 T Z 4 a '- pw N �a zw o o= N) O as a z° oQ v �- W J K m 2 Q Q W Y K V Z _Q LL. O U N z 0 T